10.12.a
Approve Change Order: 3-System Storm Drain Project
Packet Pg. 172
E U N I C E M . U L L O A C U R T I S B U R T O N Mayor CHRISTOPHER FLORES
MARC LUCIO
Council Members
KAREN C. COMSTOCK DR. LINDA REICH
Mayor Pro Tem City Manager
CITY of CHINO
13220 Central Avenue, Chino, California 91710
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 667, Chino, California 91708-0667 (909) 334-3250 • (909) 334-3720 Fax
Web Site: www.cityofchino.org
DATE: CONTRACT NO.:
ACCEPTED BY:
RECOMMENDED BY: James Pagani
APPROVED BY: Maria Fraser, PE
APPROVED BY: Amer Jakher, PE
Director of Public Works
APPROVED BY: Dr. Linda Reich
ATTEST:
Date
CITY OF CHINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Contractor
03/01/23
City Clerk
CIP Manager
Date
Date
Date
Project Engineer
NOTE: All workmanship and materials called for by this Change Order shall be fully in accordance with the original Contract Document insofar as the same may be applied without conflict to the conditions set forth by this Change Order. The time for completing the Contract will not be extended unless expressly provided for in the Change Order. This Change Order shall not be considered as such until it has been signed by authorized representatives of the Contractor and the City. Upon final approval, distribution of copies will be made as required.
CHANGE ORDER NO: 5
Date
SD-153
City Manager Date
Richard Beltran
Digitally signed by Richard
Beltran
DN: C=US,
[email protected],
O="James McMinn, Inc.",
OU=Engineering, CN=Richard
Beltran
Date: 2023.03.02 13:14:45-08'00'
03/02/2023
Natalie Gonzaga
10.12.a
Approve Change Order: 3-System Storm Drain Project
Packet Pg. 173
EUNICE M. ULLOA CURTIS BURTON
Mayor CHRISTOPHER FLORES
MARC LUCIO
Council Members
KAREN C. COMSTOCK DR. LINDA REICH
Mayor Pro Tem City Manager
CITY of CHINO
13220 Central Avenue, Chino, California 91710
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 667, Chino, California 91708-0667 (909) 334-3250 • (909) 334-3720 Fax
Web Site: www.cityofchino.org
DATE: CONTRACT NO.:
1. Necessity for change:
2. Is proposed change an alternate bid?
3. Will proposed change alter the project scope?
4. Effect of this change on project contractors? None
5. Has consent of surety been obtained?
6. If Yes, will the policies be extended?
7. Effect on operation and maintenance costs: None.
DISTRIBUTION:
Original: Contract File/City Clerk
Copy: Project Engineer for Contractor
Management Analyst (2)
Project File
PW CO File
CITY OF CHINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
03/01/23 CHANGE ORDER NO: 5
Will this change effect expiration or extent of insurance coverage? See page 1.
REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE
SD-153
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Not Necessary
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
10.12.a
Approve Change Order: 3-System Storm Drain Project
Packet Pg. 174
Revenue: Expenditure:
Transfer In: Transfer Out:
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF CHINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER
FROM: NICHOLAS S. LIGUORI, AICP, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023 -008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT,
MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021 -2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE
DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -016, IN-LIEU FEES.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing; 2) adopt Resolution No. 2023 -015 approving an addendum to the 2021-2029 Housing Element Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND); 3) adopt Resolution No. 2023 -014 approving General Plan Amendment PL22 -0076; 4) approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 2023 -008 Zoning Ordinance Ame ndment PL22-0078 and Zone Change PL22 -0077; 5) approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 2023 -009 approving Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan Amendment PL22 -0089, Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan Amendment PL22 -0090, and East Chino Specific Plan Amendm ent PL22 -0091; and 6) adopt Resolution No. 2023 -016 approving a Mixed Use and Affordable Housing District In -Lieu fee.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact resulting from this item. This item consists of amendments to the map and text of the City’s Gen eral Plan, Zoning Code, and various Specific Plans to implement affordable housing as outlined in the 2021 -2029 Housing Element and does not involve any future expenditures. There are potential future revenues for affordable housing that could be realized from developers paying the affordable housing in-lieu fee.
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 175
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 2
CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:
The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
· Positive City Image
· Responsible Long-Range Planning
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 176
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 3
BACKGROUND
The City of Chino's 2021 -2029 Housing Element (“Housing Element”) articulates a strategy for meeting its Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) obligations by the creation of two new zoning overlay districts that permit housing at densities deemed affordable to low and very low income households in Chino (defined as earning less than 80% and less than 50% of the area median income (AMI ), respectively). The new overlays created are an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) and a Mixed Use Overlay (MUO). The AHO and MUO would apply to sites identified in Attachment A. Additionally, to help ensure that RHNA requirements for lower income households are met, the Housing Element calls for completion of a study to assess the feasibility of adopting inclusionary zoning requirements. Inclusionary requirements would require the mandatory construction of a certain percentage of affordable housing units or payment of an equivalent in-lieu fee or other alternative compliance method as part of each new residential development in the overlays.
The AHO and MUO sites currently have non -residential zoning, or a zoning designation of less than 30 dwelling units (“du/ac”) per acre, and as such, the approval of Chino voters was required to either allow residential uses or increase residential densities on the sites consistent with Measure M, the City's residential growth control measure adopted in 1988. Accordingl y, Measure Y (Ordinance No. 2022 -001) was placed on the ballot in June 2022 requesting voter approval to allow residential uses of up to 30 du/ac in the AHO and MUO to accommodate affordable housing to meet the City’s RHNA obligations. Measure Y passed wit h 73.3 percent voter approval, and staff and the General Plan Update consultant (“consultant”) have prepared draft zoning ordinance amendments (“zoning amendments”) to Chapter 20 (Zoning Code) of the Chino Municipal Code to implement the overlay districts and associated development standards. Adoption of the overlays would also require targeted amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, as well as to the East Chino, Majestic Spectrum, and Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plans for consistency with the proposed zoning amendments and related development standards. The proposed amendments provide a positive City image by providing additional housing development opportunities in the City that help to meet the housing needs of residents of all incom e levels as outlined in the General Plan. The amendments also promote responsible long range planning by creating AHO and MUO districts and associated development standards to implement the 2021 -2029 Housing Element. The California Department of Housing an d Community Development (HCD) has made certification of the updated Housing Element contingent on adoption of the overlays.
On January 17, 2023, the City Council held a workshop to review and provide feedback on several key policy questions related to the AHO and MUO and associated development standards. The Council provided direction on the following key points:
· Use of the overlays should be voluntary, providing property owners the option of constructing higher density and affordable housing if they wish. · Projects in the overlays should have a base density of 20 du/ac and be eligible for
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 177
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 4
increases in allowable density up to 30 du/ac in exchange for a greater share of affordable units. Council requested a sliding scale be incorporated to clearly illustrate the percentage of affordable units required for an increase in density. · Small projects of 20 units or less should be allowed to pay an affordable housing fee instead of constructing the units onsite to help with financial feasibility; however, to the extent permitted under State law, larger residential projects in the overlays should be required to build affordable units onsite.
· The number of parking spaces required to be covered should be reduced in high density residential projects in the overlays to help with financial feasibility, but the overall number of off-street parking spaces required should be consistent with the existing standards in Chapter 20.18 (Parking) of the Zoning Code for multi-family dwellings. · Additional building height (up to one additional story) should be permitted where necessary to allow for projects to achieve higher density while also providing adequate onsite open space and recreational amenities. Taller buildings should be clustered on the site. The Council was unanimou s in emphasizing that open space and recreational amenities are important for the quality of life of future residents of projects in the overlays.
· The Planning Commission should stay involved in the development review process via a checklist type of desi gn review using the City’s Site Approval procedures to confirm compliance with the established objective standards.
Additionally, the Council requested that staff and the consultant provide some reference projects from other communities in the region to he lp visualize what high density projects built to the standards comparable to those proposed would look like. Several representative projects have been included as shown in Attachment B.
Based on City Council direction received at the January workshop, staf f and the consultant finalized a draft of the zoning amendments and completed a financial evaluation/nexus study to assess whether inclusionary housing requirements, along with the proposed development standards and affordability requirements, would ensure the development of affordable housing in the City, while also making economic sense in our local real estate market. On February 9, 2023, a draft of the revised zoning amendments was posted to the City's website and made available for public review and comment ahead of the public hearings. During the public review, staff was contacted by two property owners/representatives of potential developers that identified some concerns regarding a few of the proposed overlay development standards, as well as the high percentage of affordable inclusionary requirements proposed by the City.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments on March 6, 2023. Following the posting of the Planning Commission agenda, staff received two letters from the same property owners/representatives regarding the overlay standards and inclusionary requirements. The Planning Commission discussed the concerns outlined in the letters and continued the hearing to the March 20, 2023 Planning Commission meeting base d on staff’s
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 178
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 5
recommendation to allow additional time to review the concerns. The concerns identified were related to the parking location for certain types of developments, building height and upper story offsets, open space requirements, and the inclusion ary housing requirement analysis not being consistent with current construction costs and City fees. During the time between Planning Commission meetings, staff meet with the consultant team and the parties that provided the letters to discuss their commen ts on the proposed Zoning Amendments and worked with the consultant team to incorporate modifications to the standards to address developers’ concerns.
Overall, the modifications incorporated provided developers more options for meeting the standards and will thus help to generate financially feasible projects. Additionally, staff and the consultant reviewed the economic analysis of the proposed inclusionary requirements in light of current and future construction costs and City fees. The analysis was previ ously based on City fees that did not include the latest increases to Development Impact and Park Fees. These costs have bearing on the financial feasibility of development projects and accordingly, the economic analysis of the inclusionary requirements ha s been updated to reflect the 2024 estimated public permit and fee costs.
Additionally, Staff received two letters related to the SB 330 preliminary application that was submitted to the City in September 2022. The application is for the development of 300 apartments at 4700 Chino Hills Parkway, east of Ramona Avenue. An SB 330 preliminary application locks in the applicable development standards at the time the preliminary application is submitted.
In consultation with the City Attorney following the Marc h 6, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, and consistent with direction from the City Council, staff was directed to allow for a “carveout” for the SB 330 project since it was submitted prior to the AHO and MUO standards being finalized and adopted. With the “carveout” provision, the SB 330 applicant will be able to move forward with their project, but as a courtesy, the applicant is working with the City to be more in compliance with the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments to create consistency for p rojects that will be submitted in the overlays in the future. The “carveout” language is outlined in the Draft Zoning Ordinance for City Council consideration.
At the March 20, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the updated zoning amendments and inclusionary requirements to the City Council by a 6 -0 (1 abstention) vote. The attached Draft Zoning Ordinance and Specific Plan Amendment Ordinance reflect the Commission recommendations. The Planning Commission made no changes to the Draft General Plan resolution that is also included for City Council approval.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments
In order to fully implement the Housing Element for the creation of two new zoning overlay districts, amendments to the City’s General Plan and Zoning Map are required. These amendments revise the General Plan Map and Zoning Map to identify the location of the AHO and MUO sites (Attachment A). Additionally, amendments to the text of the Land Use Element
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 179
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 6
of the General Plan are also being proposed to establish the overlay districts as a specific land use in the General Plan. Similar revisions to the City’s Zoning Ordinance (“Zoning Code”) are proposed as outlined below. As part of the zoning amendments, farm employee housing provisions are being added to the Zoning Code as required by State law and the adopted Housing Element.
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
The AHO and MUO would permit residential development at up to 30 du/ac on voter approved sites to help the City meet its RHNA obligations, prior to the application of any State density bonus allowance. The majority of the AHO and MUO sites do not currently have zoning that allows for housing, so the overlays introduce development and design standards to integra te new residential development and ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. The proposed standards for multi -family housing govern permitted uses; site design (lot size, dimensions, coverage, internal circulation); building design (height, setbacks, ent rances, massing); parking; and landscaping. The proposed standards are based on the requirements identified in the City’s existing RD20 (20 du/ac) and mixed -use districts, with some modifications to accommodate increased density above 20 du/ac to help make an affordable housing project financially viable for property owners.
An overview of the overlay standards is provided below with an emphasis of the aspects of the RD20 and mixed-use district standards that have been modified to accommodate the 30 du/ac allowance provided in the AHO and MUO.
Density and Affordability
The proposed zoning amendments establish a voluntary program for inclusionary housing in the overlay districts, with no specific requirements that any affordable housing be built. If a propert y owner simply wanted to build retail or office space, add commercial uses, or renovate and enlarge existing buildings on a site consistent with the base zoning, that could be done under the current land use regulations and development standards already es tablished for the site.
However, if the potential financial returns make sense for an affordable housing project or mixed-use development with affordable housing, either on vacant land or with redevelopment of an underutilized site, then the proposed AHO a nd MUO standards establish minimum requirements, including the amount of housing that would have to be affordable to low or very low income renters or owners. The financial evaluation/nexus study has confirmed that allowing residential uses and offering an increase in density to get additional affordable housing for lower income residents is justifiable. The reduction in profitability can be offset by:
· Increases in density, lowering land costs per unit;
· Reductions in development costs with adjustments in standards; and · Modest increases in market rents offset the cost increase and still provide a fair and reasonable return on money invested in a project.
A financial evaluation/nexus study and policy recommendations were completed to establish the
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 180
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 7
financial viability of an inclusionary requirement. In the letters provided to the Planning Commission, one of the developers questioned the assumptions of the economic analysis, including the development impact fees assumed in the financial modeling. Upon review by staff, it was confirmed that the economic analysis was based on fees cited in the City's previous 2021-2029 Housing Element draft and did not fully account for current 2023 fees and projected increases, as well a recent construction cost and interest rate increases. Staff deems it appropriate to base the economic analysis on the permits fees and costs likely to be in place in 2024, as this will likely be when development in the overlay areas will start. Accordingly, the economic analysis has been updat ed and the results are presented in an addendum to the Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) Study (see Attachment A to Resolution No. 2023-016).
The initial KMA study had determined that the following levels of affordability could be supported in rental apartme nt projects: 10% low income at 20 up to 20% low income at 30 du/ac on a sliding scale. Additionally, the study determined that 5% moderate income (defined as earning less than 120% AMI) requirement can be supported by ownership housing development projects, but that it is not feasible to impose a low income inclusionary housing obligation on ownership projects. This sliding scale inclusionary requirement was presented to the City Council at the January 17, 2023 workshop.
However, based on review of the updated fee estimates, the revised KMA study has determined that the following levels of affordability could be supported in rental apartment projects: 9% low income at 26 du/ac and 13% low income at 30 du/ac. This essentially shifts the base zoning from 20 du /acre as previously analyzed to 26 du/acre. Additionally, the revised analysis determined that a 3% moderate income requirement can be supported by ownership housing development projects at all densities above 26 du/ac and reaffirmed that it is not feasibl e to impose a low income inclusionary housing obligation on ownership projects. The proposed affordability requirements for the overlays have been adjusted to reflect the findings of the revised KMA study, as shown below in Table 1.
The revised sliding scale still only allows for increased density up to a maximum of 30 units per acre if the developer increases the share of affordable housing units built. For example, a rental apartment project proposed at 26 du/ac would be required to make 9% of the units a vailable to lower income households, while a rental project proposed at 30 du/ac would be required to make 13% of the units available to lower income households. The increases in density would be “by right” and would not have to be negotiated on a case -by-case basis, so developers would know up front what density they could expect if they provided a certain number of affordable housing units in the City for low income or very low -income residents. It should be noted that developers may also be eligible for a density bonus, development incentives, and/or concessions under existing State Density Bonus Law, the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, and other applicable State laws. In such cases, depending on the percentage of affordable units proposed, the allowable density may exceed 30 du/ac based on State law.
Table 1 - Additional Density for Qualifying Affordable Rental Housing Projects
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 181
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 8
Maximum Allowable Density (Units per Adjusted Gross Acre) 26 27 28 29 30
Percent Affordable Units Required in Rental Projects:
Low Income units 9% 10% 11% 12% 13%
In view of financial feasibility challenges, small projects proposing up to 20 units total would have the option to pay an affordable housing fee in lieu of providing affordable units on site as identified in Attachment A to Resolution No. 2023 -016. As directed by the City Council, projects of more than 20 units proposed within the AHO and MUO will be required to construct units on site; however, payment of an in-lieu fee is allowed for larger projects if the Planning Commission makes a finding that providing affordable units on -site would result in an extreme financial hardship to the developer and make the proposed project financially infeasible.
The zoning amendments also allow for land dedication in lieu of onsite construction, provided the land to be dedicated is suitable for the construction of the required number of affordable units identified in Table 1, is located within one mile of the project site, and has a fair market value equivalent to or greater than the amount of in-lieu fees required. Development and design standards applicable in this case would require consistency with the for -sale product. This option is advantageous for the following reasons:
· Affordable housing developers have s pecific expertise in the development and operation of affordable housing projects; and
· Dedicated affordable housing projects have access to State and federal funding sources that are not available to market rate projects. These funding sources provide a more cost-efficient way to achieve deeper affordability than can be supported by an inclusionary housing requirement that is imposed on individual projects with market rate housing on a case-by-case basis.
Parking
Initially, as expressed to the City Council at the January 17, 2023 workshop, the AHO and MUO standards required that off -street parking for all projects be provided in the rear of buildings in the back half of the lot, not between the building and primary street frontage. The intent of the requirement is to enhance walkability and screen parking areas from public view. Based on discussion with developers and the consultant team, the proposed parking requirements have been revised to restrict surface parking for projects that are located along the frontage of Riverside Drive and Central Avenue south of Highway 60. These developments will incorporate landscaping and building designs that engage pedestrians, and are desired to foster walkable, pedestrian-oriented environments. Many peer cities have si milar rules, and the development community has been able to work with such requirements. Further, in the MUO district some accommodation for drop -off spaces, used for retail shopping, and limited guest parking with valet service could be provided with Plan ning Commission approval. For projects located on
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 182
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 9
streets that are likely to remain auto orientated, these standards would not apply and parking would be allowed adjacent to the streets, as currently outlined in the Zoning Code.
It is important to note, that the total amount of parking identified in the proposed overlays will not change and is the same as required in Chapter 20.18 (Parking) of the Zoning Code for multi - family dwellings, consistent with City Council direction received at the January 17, 2023 workshop. However, to assist with the financial feasibility of projects in the overlays, a reduction in the number of parking spaces required to be covered for higher density projects is proposed, as shown in red below in Table 2. For clarification, words shown in black within the table reflect the existing parking requirement language in the City’s Zoning Code. Red language identifies proposed changes to the existing parking requirement language.
Table 2 - Parking Standards for Multi-Family Development Uses, Activities and
Facilities
Number of Required Parking Spaces (all spaces are uncovered unless otherwise noted)
Multiple-Family Dwellings
(Less than 16 units/acre)
Studio Units: 1 covered space per dwelling, 1 Bedroom Units: 1.5 covered spaces per dwelling, 2 or more Bedroom Units: 2 covered spaces, Guest Parking: 1 space for every 10 dwelling units Multiple-Family Dwellings
(16-19 units/acre)
Studio Units: 1 covered space per dwelling 1 Bedroom Units: 1 covered and 0.5 uncovered space per dwelling 2 or more Bedroom Units: 1 covered and 1 uncovered space per dwelling Guest Parking:
1 space for every 10 dwelling units
Multiple-Family Dwellings
(20 units/acre or greater)
Studio Units: 1 covered or uncovered space per dwelling, 1 Bedroom Units: 1.5 covered or uncovered spaces per dwelling, 2 or more Bedroom Units: 2 covered or uncovered spaces Guest Parking: 1 space for every 10 dwelling units
On-Site Open Space and Recreational Amenities
As emphasized by the City Council at the January 17, 202 3 workshop, the provision of adequate common open space and recreational amenities on site is important for ensuring that projects in the AHO and MUO provide a quality of life comparable to that for residents in other parts of the City. The RD20 open space standards were analyzed on typical overlay sites to assess whether the requirements could be met at higher densities; however, it was determined that it would not be possible to accommodate density above 20 du/ac within a three -story building envelope whi le also providing the parking and front setbacks required in the RD20 district. Therefore, certain modifications to the open space standards are proposed to permit higher density development on the overlay sites while also ensuring adequate parking is available.
Whereas RD20 standards require a minimum of 35% of net lot area devoted to permanent open space, that requirement is reduced to 20% in the overlays, and the minimum area to be devoted
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 183
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 10
to outdoor living area (private or common open space) must be 400 square feet per unit. To allow for flexibility in site planning, the staff is proposing a revision to the proposed standards that would specifically allow landscaped areas that are contiguous to common open space, or connected to such space by walkways, t o be counted in this percentage. The spaces would have to be substantial in size (a minimum dimension of five feet, down from eight feet originally proposed), so slivers of planting strips in the parking lot, for example, would not count as common open space.
Additionally, if necessary to enable provision of common open space for recreational facilities, building height of up to 45 feet in the AHO and up to 55 feet in the MUO is allowed, provided the buildings are clustered on the site. Further, the RD20 requirement for front setbacks of 25 feet is reduced to 15 feet in the overlays, given that parking is to be provided in the rear of the buildings This modification also encourages walkable site design within the overlays.
Section 20.17.050.C of the Zoning C ode requires the development of major and minor recreational facilities in proposed multi -family developments. These requirements will necessitate the use of more land than may be available in a high -density project. As such, the AHO and MUO standards allo w for the development of "essential recreational facilities" in high density multi-family or mixed -use developments with a minimum of 25 du/ac. These essential recreational facilities may include: 1) a gym or fitness room, 2) space for yoga, dance, or othe r instruction, 3) enclosed or outdoor space for playing courts or games, 4) children's play area, 5) picnic and barbeque area, or 6) children’s daycare space. At least 250 square feet per unit must be provided for these recreational facilities, and there m ust be a minimum of two of these facilities in projects with 10 -50 units, three of these facilities in projects with 51 -100 units, and four or more of these facilities in projects with more than 100 units. No essential recreational facilities are required in a small project, with less than 10 dwelling units. In the interest of providing additional flexibility to meet this requirement, the amount of space that could be in a building used for recreational purposes is 15% of the total amount required and also allow the space to be within a mixed use building.
Site and Building Design
The site design standards proposed for the AHO and MUO cover lot area, lot dimensions, lot coverage, landscaping, setbacks and internal circulation. An important emphasis in both overlays is on creating pedestrian -oriented development that provides a safe, walkable environment. For that reason, site design standards promote the inclusion of plazas, interior walkways, canopies, arcades, outdoor living areas, and recreational faciliti es in high density projects.
The building design standards proposed for the AHO and MUO cover height, upper story setbacks, entrances, building articulation, and massing. The standards are intended to prevent “boxy” buildings and produce visually engaging designs. Long walls are required to incorporate recesses or offsets as well as variations in roof height to prevent “boxy” shapes. Additionally, for projects that are adjacent to a residential district, the standards require additional upper story setbacks above three stories or utilize architectural articulation such as popouts, changes in
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 184
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 11
vertical wall planes, or balconies.
To help illustrate the type of residential and mixed-use projects likely to result from the proposed design standards, representative projects from other communities in the surrounding region are presented in Attachment B.
Project Approval Process
Under State law, a conditional use permit procedure cannot be used for affordable housing, and cities cannot impose a public hearing requirem ent or grant the City Council discretionary decision-making responsibilities for density bonuses for affordable housing on commercial sites as the City Council currently has under the City’s residential density bonus program if certain development incentiv es are requested. Therefore, approval of residential development and mixed-use development with residential units in the AHO and MUO would be done in accordance with the Site Approval process outlined under Section 20.23.090 of the Zoning Code. This reflects direction received from the City Council at the January 17 workshop.
A preliminary review process would be conducted at the staff level to determine whether the proposed development is in substantial compliance with the applicable planning regulations, including the objective development and design standards incorporated into the Zoning Code with the adoption of the AHO and MUO. To facilitate this review, the City's existing Preliminary Review Checklist would be updated to reflect the AHO and MUO require ments. Design review by the Planning Commission would involve a checklist style review to confirm compliance with the objective development and design standards using the City’s Site Approval procedures. The Planning Commission would have the authority to impose reasonable conditions to ensure that the provisions of the General Plan or any applicable specific plan are met, including requirements for needed off -site public improvements. This process would ensure compliance with State law, reducing the time a nd costs required for development approvals for projects in the AHO and MUO areas and helping to ensure that new development contributes to the character of the community. Certain smaller affordable projects in the overlays may also be exempt from CEQA if they meet the criteria stipulated in Section 15194 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Allowable Uses: Public Storage Facility in MUO Overlay
At the workshop with the City Council on January 17, 2023, the proposal to incorporate public storage into mixed use facilitie s was not discussed. Subsequently, developer comments noted that self -storage accessibility is an amenity increasingly necessary for cities experiencing growth of medium to high density units, allowing residents to store goods such as mountain bikes, kayak s, furniture, collectibles, business items, and out -of-season clothing that might otherwise be in garages. Comments recommended that the City should permit such uses in mixed use projects.
Staff believes this is a reasonable proposal. Public/Mini Storage i s currently only allowed in the Business Park (BP), Light Industrial (M1), and General Industrial (M2) zoning districts with approval of a special conditional use permit. Development standards for public storage are set forth in Section 20.21.220. This use could be allowed in the MUO district on large sites, subject
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 185
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 12
to some additional standards to ensure land use compatibility. The full requirements for incorporating a public storage facility in a mixed use project are outlined in the draft ordinance.
These provisions include that the site must be a minimum of 5 acres, the storage facility can’t exceed the height of the residential development and the building must be setback from neighboring streets and include architectural elements that match the resident ial and commercial buildings on-site.
Specific Plan Amendments
As mentioned, the AHO and MUO sites are spread throughout the City. Some of the sites are located within three of the City’s existing specific plan areas: the Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan, the Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan, and the East Chino Specific Plan.
Amendments to these specific plans are required to provide for consistency with the proposed General Plan and Zoning Code changes. The specific plans are being amended primarily to refer back to Chapter 20.09 (Overlay Districts) of the Zoning Code to allow for projects to be developed under standards that are located within one of the three specific plan areas. The amendments also include other minor amendments to the specific pla ns as outlined in the draft City Council Ordinance No. 2023-009.
AHO and MUO District In-Lieu Fee
In Section 20.09.090 (Overlay Districts for Affordable Housing) of Ordinance No. 2023 -008, in- lieu fee payment options are established for projects that are b etween 10 and 20 units, recognizing that the construction of affordable housing has a disproportionate impact on smaller projects. The draft ordinance also outlines that the funds submitted to the City for affordable housing are to be deposited into an newly created Overlay District Affordable Housing Fund that provides provisions on how the funds are to be implemented. The in -lieu fee payment amounts have been developed based on the Financial Evaluation/Nexus Study, as outlined in Attachment A to Resolutio n No. 2023 -016. The established in -lieu fee payment amounts are based upon a per inclusionary unit cost and per square foot of leasable/saleable area within a 100% market rate project. Approval of Resolution No. 2023 -016 by the City Council is required to formally establish affordable housing in -lieu fees in the AHO and MUO districts. A fund account number for the Overlay District Affordable Housing Fund will be created and adopted at a later date. The fee will be increased on an annual basis as outlined in the resolution.
Farm Employee Housing
As part of the zoning amendments, farm employee housing provisions are being added to the Zoning Code as required by California Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6 and Program Action 2G of the adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element.
PUBLIC NOTICE
A one-quarter page notice was published in the Chino Champion on March 25, 2023 and the City sent information out on the City’s social media platforms. Notices were also mailed to all the Overlay District Site property owners. The notice exceeds the legal noticing requirements and is adequate in scope for this project.
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 186
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE; INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2023-009, EUCALYPTUS
BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND EAST CHINO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015, ADDENDUM TO THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 2023-016, IN-LIEU FEES
PAGE 13
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Addendum to the Housing Element Update Environmental Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND), dated February 8, 2023 ha s been prepared for this project by RECON Environmental. As outlined in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum is the appropriate environmental document if only minor technical additions are needed and if there wo uld be no substantial changes to the project as previously proposed or to the circumstances under which the project was undertaken. The Addendum concluded that the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or impacts that are significan tly different than those identified in the original ND. In addition, the project would not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified significant impacts.
Therefore, the proposed project is within the scope of the Housing Element Upda te ND. As noted in the background section, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the project as amended and approve the Addendum.
Attachment A - Map of AHO and MUO and Associated Parcels Attachment B - Representative Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Project Profiles
11.13 PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 187
11.13.a
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 188
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
101403103 11488 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 4.54
101465201 11700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.24
101439302 11700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.44
101403132 11436 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.70
101551127 6210 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 8.19
101551103 6132 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 2.31
102103122 13700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.00
102103116 5319 SCHAEFER AVE AFF-OV 1.45
102103126 13779 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.97
102011101 6033 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 3.83
102010146 5993 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.19
101557211 5559 PARK PL AFF-OV 2.38
101437138 11740 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.09
101437137 11712 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.74
101438102 11769 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.38
101438103 11761 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.38
101438101 11791 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.80
101551129 6180 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.10
101551128 6160 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.12
102004425 13001 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.58
102519106 4500 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 5.38
102548201 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 0.47
102515108 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 2.43
102549101 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 0.37
101465101 11817 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.80
102103117 5345 SCHAEFER AVE AFF-OV 0.77
105205121 13078 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.34
105205122 12900 BLOCK EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.34
105205123 13102 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.69
105205124 13134 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 3.15
105325102 6622 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 4.76
105325103 6566 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 4.68
105325104 6522 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 3.36
105327109 6950 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 12.77
101403101 11436 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 2.29
102521129 4300 BLOCK CORPORATE CENTER DR AFF-OV 4.14
101945117 13375 RAMONA AVE AFF-OV 4.62
101951105 13555 RAMONA AVE AFF-OV 4.39
102029427 5088 CHINO AVE AFF-OV 0.45
11.13.a
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 189
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
102029410 13100 BLOCK 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.16
102029411 13100 BLOCK 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.16
102029412 13286 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.14
101562221 5130 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 8.98
102606105 14700 BLOCK EUCLID AVE AFF-OV Partial 113.29
101462151 11900 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.21
101507108 5501 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 4.65
101910105 4117 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 4.93
101529202 12404 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 3.45
101529206 12454 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.56
101537102 12516 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 3.01
101537103 12526 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.41
101537105 12550 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.93
101555301 5832 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 2.88
102045112 13300 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.41
101462150 11980 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.08
102520106 14700 BLOCK RAMONA AVE MU-OV 4.08
102519107 4500 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY MU-OV 8.41
101506107 5459 PHILADELPHIA AVE MU-OV 6.20
101506108 5463 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 7.52
102033111 5300 BLOCK G ST MU-OV 0.39
102033112 13399 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 0.78
102033113 13339 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.38
102033114 13309 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.76
102033116 5300 BLOCK CHINO AVE MU-OV 0.52
105205106 7041 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.68
105205107 7049 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.66
105205108 6900 BLOCK RIVERSIDE AVE MU-OV 0.33
105205109 7063 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.49
105205110 7075 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.11
105205112 12956 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.49
105205113 12962 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.64
105205114 12976 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.62
105205115 12986 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.98
105205116 13012 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 1.23
105205117 13024 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.82
105205118 13046 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.34
105205120 12900 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.96
105205125 13062 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.34
11.13.a
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 190
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
105258103 13500 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 10.36
105258104 13500 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 3.20
102513206 14659 RAMONA AVE MU-OV 8.67
102257109 4093 GRAND AVE MU-OV 8.07
101530116 12356 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.00
101460119 5402 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 6.09
101460120 5440 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 3.10
101459116 5536 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 3.40
101557827 5650 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.47
101557828 5664 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.43
101557829 5684 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.24
101504107 12266 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.79
101504106 12206 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 0.60
11.13.a
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 191
Chino
Precedent: Affordable and Mixed UseProjects
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 192
MONTCLAIR
Address: 4868 Cypress Street
Prior Use: Manufacturing
Units Developed: 211
Status: Completed
Site Area (Acres) 6.27 acre
Height of Buildings: 40’ (4 stories)
Zone: Corridor Residential (CR) District
With Transition Overlay
Maximum Permitted Density: 50 du/ac
Project Density: 34 du/ac
Open Space: Approx. 8,500 SF
Parking: 314
Project Description: Part of North Montclair Downtown Specific Plan Update, Alexan Kendry apartments is a medium density development utilizing 3-4 story buildings that sit on a 6 acre site. In addition to the 211 market-rate units, the development also consist of an 8,500 SF amenities.
Onsite Amenities: Club lounge with gourmet kitchen, lounge and dining area; billiard table, shuffleboard and poker tables; community co-work space and work niches; fitness studio and yoga studio; art/creative studio; amazon package lockers; outdoor pool with spa, courtyards with BBQ grills; dog park Site Location Site Plan of Proposed Project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 193
MONTCLAIR (continued)
Alexan Kendry Apartment Project view from Street
Indoor Amenities Outdoor Amenities Outdoor Amenities & Open Space
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 194
CLAREMONT
Address: 117 S Indian Hill Blvd
Prior Use: Commercial
Units Developed: 109
Live/work 7
Status: Approved
Site Area (Acres) 2.8 acre
Height of Buildings: 45’ (3-4 stories)
Zone: Mixed-Use
Maximum Permitted Density: 60 du/ac
Project Density: 39 du/ac
Open Space: 4,200 SF
Parking: 107
Project Description: A mixed use development proposed as the second phase of the South Village Development Project. The building sits on block D, totaling around 2.8 acres of land. The building will include 12,000 SF of retail space, 8,000 SF of “flex” office and service space as well as 14,000 SF residential space. Open spaces include a courtyard, roof deck and private residential patios.
Onsite Amenities
: Central courtyard, common room and lobby, roof deck
Site Location Site Plan of Proposed Project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 195
CLAREMONT (continued)
Rendering of proposed project Rendering of proposed project Elevation of proposed project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 196
POMONA
Address: 675 E. Mission Blvd.
Prior Use: Vacant
Units Developed: 36
Status: Approved
Site Area (Acres) 1.46 acre
Height of Buildings: 35’ (3 stories)
Zone: MU-I / Downtown Pomona Specific
Plan Area (DT-SP) / Transect Zone 5
Maximum Permitted Density: 80 du/ac
Project Density: 24.7 du/ac
Project Description: A development proposal to develop a three-story, 36 market-rate unit residential development, including seven units reserved for moderate income households.
Onsite Amenities: Private landscaped sidewalks, onsite parking, landscaped planters, private patios
Site Location Site Plan of Proposed Project
Parking: 113
Covered: 72
Tandem/On-Site: 41
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 197
POMONA (continued)
Rendering of proposed project
Elevation of proposed project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 198
ONTARIO
Address: 220 S. Fern Ave.
Prior Use: Vacant Lot
Units Developed: 75
Status: Completed
Site Area (Acres) 2.95 acre
Height of Buildings: 55’ (2-4 stories)
Zone: MU-1 (Downtown Mixed-Use)
Maximum Permitted Density: 25-75 du/ac
Project Density: 25 du/ac
Open Space: ~4,000 SF
Parking: 170
Project Description: Emporia Place is an affordable community of 75 apartments for low and very low income families that earn 60% below AMI for San Bernardino County. 24 units are for low income; 42, very low income; and 8, for extremely low income units. Moreover, there is 4,000 SF community building with services.
Onsite Amenities
: Playground, laundry facility, landscaped open space,
balconies and patios, community room, computer lab, on-site management as well as adult wellness classes and after school programs for children.
Site Location Site Plan of Proposed Project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 199
ONTARIO (continued)
Rendering of proposed project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 200
CLAREMONT
Address: 1030 West Foothill Blvd.
Prior Use: Commercial (restaurant)
Units Developed: 56
Live/work 12
Low Income 5-6
Status: Under Review
Site Area (Acres) 3.05 acre
Height of Buildings: 33’-9” (3 stories)
Zone: Mixed-use
Maximum Permitted Density: 18.3 du/ac
Project Density: 18.3 du/ac
Open Space: 18,700 SF
Public Open Space: 15,034 SF
Private Residential: 3,666 SF
Parking: 126
Covered 112
Uncovered 45
Project Description: Development of residential development that includes live/work component on a 3 acre site. The development is comprised of 10 separate buildings, six of which are three-stories and the remaining four, two stories. The development also includes 10 percent low income housing, which qualified the project for a density bonus under state law.
Onsite Amenities
: Central community open space, BBQ Island, Fire pit, lawn area with tables and chairs
Site Plan of Proposed Project
* 10% affordable housing component qualified for density bonus Site Location
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 201
CLAREMONT (continued)
Front Elevation of Proposed Project
Street Elevation of Proposed Project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 202
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Address: 12939 Foothill Blvd
Prior Use: Vacant Lot
Units Developed: 260
Status: Under Construction
Site Area (Acres) 5.2 acre
Height of Buildings: 46’ (2-4 stories)
Zone: Urban Corridor
Maximum Permitted Density: 60 du/ac
Project Density: 50 du/ac
Open Space: 5,500 SF
Parking: 528
Below-grade: 328
Surface Parking 200
Project Description: The proposed project would construct a market-rate apartment complex with 260 units in two to four-story buildings on 5.2 acres of land. The building includes one live-work unit, 3,339 SF of commercial space and 5,500 SF of indoor amenity space.
Onsite Amenities: Leasing office, fitness center, club room, business center, landscaped courtyard with a pool and spa, fireplace, cook center, open lawn, children’s tot lot and landscaped paseo, dog run, etc.
Site Location Site Plan of Proposed Project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 203
RANCHO CUCAMONGA (continued)
Rendering of proposed project
Rendering of proposed project Rendering of proposed project
11.13.b
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 204
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHINO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE 2021 -2029 HOUSING ELEMENT NEGATIVE DECLA RATION FOR PL22-0076 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT), PL22 -0077 (ZONE CHANGE), PL22 -0078 (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT) , PL22-0089 (EUCALYPTUS BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT), PL22 -0090 (MAJESTIC SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) , AND PL22 -0091 (EAST CHINO SPE CIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT.
WHEREAS, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Recon Environmental, Inc. has prepared an Addendum to the 2021 -2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND) for this Project pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Addendu m has determined the project is within the scope of the ND, which adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA. As outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum is the appropriate environmental document if the proposed project does not constitute significant new information or chang e the assumptions, ana lysis, conclusions, o r mitigation measures of the previously prepared ND to a significant degree. The analysis concluded that the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or impacts that are s ignificantly differen t tha n those identified in the original ND. In addition, the project would not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified significant impacts. Therefore, the proposed project is within the scope of the previous ND. The Addendum satisfies the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and the CEQA Guid elines (California Public Resources Code §§21000 et seq.; 14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et seq.); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was asked to consider a proposed amendment to the City’s General Plan Land Use Element, Land Use Map and Zoning Map to identify the location of the Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Overlay District sites to be consistent with the City’s 2 021-2029 Housing Element (PL22-0076 and PL22 -0077); a proposed amendment to Title 20 (Zoning) of the Chino Municipal Code to update the following chapters in accordance with the Affordable Housing a nd Mixed Use Ov erlay Districts: Chapter 20.03 (Zoning Dist ricts and Zoning Map), Chapter 20.08 (Agricultural, Open Space and Public Zoning Districts), Chapter 20.09 (Overlay Districts), Chapter 20.18 (Par king), Chapter 20.21 (Standards for Specific Land Uses), Chapter 20.23 (Administration), and Chapter 20.24 (Glossary). PL22-0078 (Zoning Ordinance Amendment); and proposed amendments to the Eucalyptus Business Park, Majestic Spectrum and East Chino Specifi c Plans revising the text of various sections within these Specific Plans related to the addition of the Affor dable Housing and Mixed Use Overlay Districts PL22-0089 (Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan Amendment), PL22 -0090 (Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan Amendment) and PL22 -0091 (East Chino Specific Plan Amendment), which together constitute the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the 2021-2029 Housing Element Negat ive Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) serves as the foundation document for the Addendum; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chino has made the proposed Addendum available for public review; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2023, and again on March 20, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the proposed General Plan Amendment (PL2 2-0076),
11.13.c
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 205
RESOLUTION NO. PC2023-015
Zone Change (PL2 2-0077), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (PL2 2-0078), Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan Amend ment (PL22-0089), Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0090) and East Chino Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0091) and the related Addendum to the 2021 -2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND) and adopted Resolution Nos. PC2023-008, PC2023-009, PC2023-011 recommending the City Council to approve General Plan Amendment (PL2 2-0076), Zone Change (PL2 2-0077), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (PL2 2-0078), Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0089), Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0090) and East Chino Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0091), and Resolution No. PC2023-010, recommending the City Council adopt the Addendum to the 2021 -2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND); and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, the City Council held a d uly noticed public hearing for the proposed Addendum to the 2021 -2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND) in compliance with law, entert ained the written and oral report of staff, and took public testimony on the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chino, California, does hereby FIND, DETERMINE, and RESOLVE as follows:
A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
B. Based on substantial evidence, both written and oral, from the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings and takes the following actions with respec t to the 2019 ND:
1. The Draft Addendum has been compl eted in compliance with CEQA, and is adequate for this proposed project.
2. The Draft Addendum was presented to the City Council , and the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the documents.
3. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
4. Based on the above, the City Council hereby further finds and determin es that the Project will have no significant impact on the environment as outlined in the Addendum to the 2021-2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declara tion (SCH No. 2021100569) (ND) , attached hereto as Exhibit A.
5. The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which adoption of this resolution is based are in the custody of the Cit y of Chino, Development Services De partment, Planning Division, 13220 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 91710.
6. Based upon the independent judgment of the City Council, the City Council adopts th e Addendum to the 2021 -2029 Housing Elemen t Negative Declaration ( SCH No. 2021100569) (ND) , dated February 8, 2023, prepared by Recon Environmental, Inc ., for General Plan Amendment (PL2 2-0076), Zone Change (PL2 2-0077), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (PL2 2-0078), Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan Amend ment (PL22-0089),
11.13.c
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 206
RESOLUTION NO. PC2023-015
Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan Ame ndment (PL22-0090) and East Chino Specific Plan Amendment (PL22-0091).
7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify as to the adoption of this Resolution as of the date set forth below and forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to the Applicant at the address of record set forth in the Application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2023.
EUNICE M. ULLOA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
NATALIE GONZAGA, CITY CLERK
State of California )
County of San Bernardino ) §
City of Chino )
I, Natalie Gonzaga, City Clerk of the City of Chino, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Chino City Council at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of April, by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NATALIE GONZAGA, CITY CLERK
Attachment: Exhibit A – Addendum to the City of Chino Housi ng Elem ent Update Ini tial Study/Negative Declaration for the Zoning, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
11.13.c
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 207
Addendum to the City of Chino Housing
Element Update Initial Study/Negative
Declaration for the Zoning, General Plan,
and Specific Plan Amendments for the
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
Implementation Project
Chino, California
Prepared for
City of Chino
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
Prepared by
RECON Environmental, Inc.
3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600
San Diego, CA 92108
P 619.308.9333
RECON Number 10105
February 8, 2023
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 208
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Title ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....1
2. Lead Agency Name and Address ................................ ................................ ............................. 1
3. Contact Person and Phone Number ................................ ................................ ........................ 1
4. Project Location ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 1
5. Project Applicant/Sponsor’s Name and Address ................................ ................................ . 2
6. General Plan Designation ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2
7. Zoning ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 2
8. Statement of Environmental Findings ................................ ................................ ..................... 2
9. Previous Environmental Document ................................ ................................ ......................... 2
10. Summary of Original Project ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 2
11. Project Site Existing Conditions ................................ ................................ ................................ 3
12. Project Description ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 4
13. Other Required Agency Approvals or Permits Required ................................ ................. 14
14. New Significant Environmental Effects or Substantially More Severe Environmental Effects Compared to Those Identified in the Previous CEQA Document ..................... 14
15. Determination ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 15
15.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................................ 16
15.2 Agriculture Resources ..................................................................................................................... 18
15.3 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................................... 20
15.4 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................................... 22
15.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................... 25
15.6 Energy .................................................................................................................................................. 27
15.7 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................................ 28
15.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................... 32
15.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................. 33
15.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ...................................................................................................... 37
15.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................................. 40
15.12 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................ 41
15.13 Noise .................................................................................................................................................... 41
15.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................................ 43
15.15 Public Services .................................................................................................................................. 44
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 209
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
15.16 Recreation ........................................................................................................................................... 47
15.17 Transportation ................................................................................................................................... 48
15.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................... 51
15.19 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................................ 51
15.20 Wildfire ................................................................................................................................................ 56
15.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................... 58
FIGURES
1: Regional Location ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2: Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 3: Candidate Housing Sites and Overlay Zones .......................................................................................... 7 TABLES
1: Summary of RHNA Status and Sites Inventory ....................................................................................... 3 2: Development Standards for the AHO District ......................................................................................... 8 3: Development Standards for the MUO District ...................................................................................... 10
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 210
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
CITY OF CHINO
ADDENDUM TO ADOPTED INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION
This document is an Addendum to the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) (State Clearinghouse No. 2021100569) that was adopted by the City Council in January 2022, hereafter referred to as “ 2022 IS/ND”). The Addendum analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project in light of the 2022 IS/ND, which analyzed potential environmental impacts associated with the development of candidate housing sites identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The Addendum has been prepared in accordance with relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines.
According to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a previously certifi ed Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) or Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document in instances when “only minor technical changes or additions are necessary” and when the new information does not involve new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the previous EIR. The analysis herein demonstrates that the proposed addendum involves only minor technical changes to the 2022 IS/ND and would not result in any new or increased severity significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the 2022 IS/ND. As such, an addendum is the appropriate environmental document under CEQA.
1. Project Title
Zoning, General Plan , and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
2. Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Chino
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
3. Contact Person and Phone Number
Michael Hitz, AICP
Principal Planner
City of Chino
Development Services Department
(909) 334-3448
[email protected]
4. Project Location
The project site consists of the entire City of Chino (City).
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 211
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
5. Project Applicant/Sponsor’s Name and Address
City of Chino
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
6. General Plan Designation
Existing: Numerous
Proposed: Numerous
7. Zoning
Existing: Numerous
Proposed: Numerous
All reports and documents referenced in this Addendum are on file with the City of Chino, Development Services Department, 13220 Central Avenue , Chino, C alifornia 91710. Telephone Number: (909) 334 -3314. A digital copy is available from the City website :
https://www.cityofchino.org/503/Environmental-Documents.
8. Statement of Environmental Findings
An Addendum to the IS/ND for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update was prepared by the City , Development Services Department to evaluate whether the proposed Zoning , General Plan , and Specific Plan Amendments for 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project (project) would result in any new significant impacts or increased severity of impacts beyond those identified in the 2022 IS/ND for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. As Lead Agency under CEQA, and based on the findings contained in the attached Addendum, the City has determined that the project would not have any new or more severe impacts that were not previously identified in the 2022 IS/ND for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The City also finds that the Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment.
The location and custodian of the documents and any other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City bases its determination to adopt this Addendum are as follows:
City of Chino, Development Services Department, 13220 Central Avenue , Chino, California, 91710.
Custodian: Michael Hitz, AICP, Principal Planner.
9. Previous Environmental Document
The 2022 IS/ND determined that implementation of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not result in any significant impacts on the environment.
10. Summary of Original Project
The City prepared the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update to identify the City’s housing needs and outline goals, policies, and programs to address them. The Housing Element evaluated ways to
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 212
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) of 6,978 new housing units allocated to the City by the Southern California Association of Governments. Table 1 presents the City’s RHNA allocation by income category. To this end, the City completed a parcel-specific land inventory that identified an inventory of candidate housing sites that could accommodate the City’s RHNA allocation. Through this process, the City demonstrated the capacity to accommodate up to a total of 8,528 candidate housing units on a total of approximately 738.46 acres comprised of 122 parcels throughout the City, as follows: existing capacity within The Preserve Specific Plan (The Preserve) and Rancho Miramonte area; application of the proposed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) and Mixed Use Overlay (MUO) ; and development of future Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update anticipated that T he Preserve and Rancho Miramonte would have the potential capacity to accommodate up to 3,773 housing units, the AHO and MUO would have the potential to accommodate up to 4,435 units, and that approximately 320 ADUs would be constructed during the 2021 -2029 planning period. Overall, the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update identified candidate sites that would yield 8,528 potential housing units within the City, which represents a buffer of 1,550 housing units , or 22 percent over and above the total required RHNA allocation of 6,978 housing units . The buffer allows the City to navigate the "no net loss” provisions of State Housing Element law in the event that sites on the inventory do not develop as projected in the Housing Element.
Table 1
Summary of RHNA Status and Sites Inventory
(Housing Units)
Extremely Low/
Very Low Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income Total
2021-2029 RHNA Allocation 2,113 1,284 1,203 2,378 6,978 RHNA Credit (Units Built) -- -- -- -- --
Adequate Sites Preservation -- -- -- -- --
Total RHNA Obligations 2,113 1,284 1,203 2,378 6,978
In addition to identifying an inventory of housing, adoption of the Housing Element required future action by the City to implement identified programs intended to assist in meeting the goals and policies of the Housing Element.
The 2022 IS/ND evaluated whether the Housing Element Update would result in a significant impact as defined by CEQA. The 2022 IS/ND included an analysis of all Housing Element component parts including future implementation of overlay zones that would establish the AHO and MUO. The 2022 IS/ND noted that the City would complete these overlay zoning actions through implementation of Programs 3B and 3C , which would include detailed development standards, permitted uses, and other development characteristics for the overlay zones.
11. Project Site Existing Conditions
The City is located within the west end of San Bernardino County (County), bordered by Los Angeles County to the northwest, Riverside County to the southeast, and is located two miles north of the Orange County border. The City is specifically located within the Chino Valley, and is surrounded by the cities of Pomona and Montclair to the north, the City of Ontario to the northeast and east, City
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 213
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
of Eastvale to the southeast, City of Corona to the south, and City of Chino Hills to the west. Regional access to the City is provided primarily via State Route (SR) 60 and SR-71. SR-60, or Pomona Freeway, runs east-west and bisects the northern portion of the City , while SR-71, or Chino Valley Freeway, runs north-south along the City’s western border. Figure 1 presents the City’s location in a regional context and Figure 2 presents the City in a local context.
The City covers approximately 18,938 acres of land area, or 29.6 square miles. The City’s topography is relatively flat with elevations ranging from approximately 700 to 800 above mean sea level. As described above, the City is constrained for the most part by neighboring municipalities. Additionally, the Chino Creek, a major stream, runs diagonally in a north-south direction along the City’s western border.
The City is predominantly comprised of residential land uses, with other major land uses including the California Institution for Men and the California Institution for Women, the Chino Airport, as well as industrial and manufacturing uses. Most of the City’s residential development is located north of Schaefer Avenue, though some is located in The Preserve, College Park, and East Chino.
12. Project Description
The project implements Programs 3B, 3C, and 2G identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, which require the City to adopt regulations creating a set of zoning amendments for an AHO, a MUO, and F armworker Housing. The project also inclu des zoning amendments to create an inclusionary housing fee program as a companion action , as well as amendments to three Specific Plans for consistency with overlay standards . Details of each project component are described in greater detail below. Figure 3 presents the location of the candidate housing sites and overlay zones.
Subsequent to adoption of the 2022 IS/ND by the City Council in January 2022, the California State Department of Housing and Community Development has reviewed and commented on upda ted versions of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. During this iterative review process, it was determined that the candidate housing sites would have the potential to yield an additional 184 units beyond what was anticipated in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND.
Based on this iterative review process with the California State Department of Housing and Community Development, the development assumptions for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update have been revised as follows:
• The total number of residential units with in The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte has decreased from 3,773 to 3,772 (-1).
• The number of ADU residential units has decreased from 320 to 160 (-160). • The number of AHO residential units has increased from 2,193 to 2,233 (+40). • The number of MUO residential units has increased from 2,242 to 2,547 (+305).
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 214
Chino
UV73
UV19
UV142
UV241
UV210
UV133
UV206
UV66
UV261
UV60
UV138
UV22
UV91
UV1
UV72
UV189
UV31
UV39
UV39
UV55
UV42
UV90
UV2
UV57
UV83
UV30
UV66
UV259
UV74
UV71
UV173
UV18
£¤395
£¤173
Cucamonga
Wilderness
Pleasant View
Ridge Wilderness
Sheep
Mountain
Wilderness
San Gabriel
Wilderness
San Mateo
Canyon
Wilderness
Angeles
National Forest
Cleveland
National
Forest
San Bernardino
National Forest
§¨¦105
§¨¦210
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
§¨¦605
§¨¦405
§¨¦10 §¨¦10
§¨¦15
§¨¦15
§¨¦15
§¨¦215
Glendora
Baldwin ParkLos Angeles
Paramount
Rancho
Cucamonga
Colton
Riverside Moreno
Valley
Corona
Lake Elsinore
Pomona
Diamond Bar
Arcadia
Monterey
Park
West
Covina
Azusa
Long
Beach
Alhambra
Rosemead
Montebello
Lakewood
Norwalk
Downey
Whitti erPico Rivera
South Gate
MenifeeIrvine
La
Habra
Temecula
Mission Viejo
Hunti ngton Beach
Tustin
Buena
Park
Fountain
Valley Lake Forest
Jurupa Valley
Anaheim
Costa
Mesa
Cypress
Fullerton
Garden
Grove
Laguna Niguel
Orange
Placenti a
Santa
Ana
Westminster
Yorba
Linda
San
Bernardino
Hesperia
Victorville
Chino Hills
Highland
Perris
Ontario
Upland
Redlands
Fontana
Rialto
Eastvale
Murrieta
Bellflower
El Monte
Pasadena
Newport
Beach
Cerritos
City of Chino
Sphere of Influence
FIGURE 1
Regional Location
0 10 Miles [
M:\JOBS6\10105\common_gis\MXD\EIR\OverlayZone_addendum\Fig1_Region.mxd 01/12/2023 bma Data Source: City of Chino GIS, 2022; San Bernardin o County GIS, 2022; Dyett & Bhatia, 2022.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 215
Chino
Chino Hills
Ontario
Montclair
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y
SA N B ER N A R D IN O C O U N T Y
R D I
N O
C O U N
T Y
E C O U N T Y
LO
S
A
N
G
ELES
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R I V E R S I D E C O
U N T Y
Chino Airport
A«
Kimball Ave
Chino Ave
Riverside Dr
Pine Ave
Walnut Ave
Schaefer Ave
Edison Ave
Ra
mona Av
e
East
End Av
e
Kimball Ave
Cent
ral
Ave
El Pr
ado Rd
Mountai
n Ave
Chino Hills Pkwy
Pipe
line Av
e
East
End Av
e
Cent
ral Ave
Riverside Dr
Schaefer Ave
Ramona A
ve
Ramona A
ve
Pine Ave
GrandAve
Euc
lid Av
e
Euclid Av
e
Phillips Blvd
Francis Ave
Edison Ave
Chino Corona Rd
Bickmore Ave
Prado
Regional
Park
Prado
Air Park
Ruben S
Ayala Park
Villa
Park
Heritage
Park
Liberty
Park
Founders
Park
Mountain
View Park
Cypress
Trails Park
Walnut
Park-
Shady
Grove
Park
Monte
Vista Park
Forest Park
Meridian
Park
Garden
Park
Mcleod
Park
Constellation
Park
10th St
Park
Oak Tree
Square Park
Little Chino Creek
Ch ino Hills
State Par k
Ch
ino
Creek
Chino Creek
Chino Creek
CALIFORNIA
INSTITUTION
FOR MEN
Santa AnaRiver
Chino Creek
Chino Creek
Ch
ino
Creek
ChinoCreek
Cucamonga
Creek
Cucamonga
Creek
Mill Cree k
Mill Creek
City of Chino
Sphere of Influence
FIGURE 2
Vicinity Map
0 7,500 Feet [
M:\JOBS6\10105\common_gis\MXD\EIR\OverlayZone_addendum\Fig2_Vicinity.mxd 01/12/2023 bma Data Source: City of Chino GIS, 2022; San Bernardin o County GIS, 2022; Dyett & Bhatia, 2022.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 216
Data Source:City of Chino GIS,2022;San Bernardino County GIS,2022;Kimley Horn FIGURE 3
Candidate Housing Sites and Overlay Zones
M:\JOBS6\10105\env\graphics\Fig3_CandidateHousing.afdesign 01/12/23 bma 0 1.5 Miles
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 217
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Overall, the updated version of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would potentially allow for the development of an additional 184 units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND, increasing the total potential yield to 8,712 candidate housing units. It should be noted that number of candidate housing sites has not changed, nor has the acreage available for development within the candidate housing sites changed. The candidate housing sites inventory still consists of 122 parcels totaling approximately 738.46 acres of land. Similarly, the maximum density standards that would be applied to the candidate housing sites has remained the same compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Consequently, the project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the additional 184 units that have been identified in the updated 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would be subj ect to the same regulatory and mitigation requirements identified in the 2022 IS/ND.
Affordable Housing Overlay
Implementation of Program 3B of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would apply the AHO to 166.5 acres of land as shown in Figure 3 and allow for development of housing at up to 30 dwelling units per ac (du/ac) to help the City meet its RHNA obligations. The AHO would be voluntary, and property owners of sites to which it applies would still be able to develop or redevelop their properties consistent with the base zoning, which is largely non -residential. However, in the event that owners elect to develop higher density housing, compliance with the standards shown on Table 2 would be required.
Table 2
Development Standards for the AHO District
Feature Standard
Site Requirements
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 65 percent
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (non-residential space) 0.751
Building Requirements
Maximum Building Height 35 feet2
Minimum Setbacks:
Front 15 feet3,4,5
Rear 15 feet
Interior Side 5 feet; 10 feet adjacent to a residential district Street Side 10 feet3,4,5
Minimum Building Separations 15 feet
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 218
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Table 2
Development Standards for the AHO District
Feature Standard
Other Requirements
Street Curb Cuts See Note 6
1Additional floor area ratio is allowed up to 1.25 for projects with affordable rental units. The amount of additional floor area ratio shall be calculated based on the same proportional increase in density allowed for qualifying projects meeting affordable housing criteria. For example, if a project receives a 25 percent increase in density, then it receives a 25 percent increase in allowable floor area ratio.
2Additional height is allowed up to 45 feet for lots with at least 100 feet of primary street frontage to enable provision of common open space for recreational facilities. The upper story above 35 feet shall be setback back an additional seven feet from the interior property line if the project is adjacent to a Residential zoning district. 3The front setback may be reduced to 10 feet on the following streets: Riverside, Central, and Euclid. 4A minimum 20-foot setback must be provided for garages and carports facing a street. 5Open or covered porches may be constructed in the front and street side setbacks to encroach no closer than 12 feet to the front property line and 5 feet to the street side property line. 6New street curb cuts are not allowed on lots with alley access unless approved by the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer to accommodate affordable housing units.
The proposed standards are based on the standards of the City's existing Residential (RD20) zoning district, with the following modifications intended to incentivize and support the financial feasibility of affordable housing projects:
• Covered Parking: In multi-family developments of 20 du/ac or more, parking may be either covered or uncovered and on-site parking shall be in the rear of buildings in the back half of the lot or development site.
• Building Heights: Additional height up to a maximum of 45 feet is available to projects if needed to ensure the adequate provision of the required common open space and on- site recreational amenities.
• Common Open Space: A minimum of 65 percent of the required outdoor living area shall be provided as common open space accessible to the living units on the lot with a minimum horizontal dimension of 20 feet.
• On-site Recreational Amenities: In lieu of the requirements of major and minor facilities in Section 20.17.050 (C) of the Chino Municipal Code (CMC), which require more land than may be available in a high -density project, developments with a minimum of 25 dwelling units per gross adjusted acre may construct fewer on -site facilities provided they are of higher quality. Recreational faciliti es may include gyms; fitness rooms; space for yoga, dance, or other instruction; playing courts; children's play areas; picnic and barbeque areas; or children’s daycare space. At least 250 square feet per unit shall be provided for these recreational facilities, and there shall be a minimum of two of these facilities in projects with 10-50 units, three of these facilities in projects with 51- 100 units, and four or more of these facilities in projects with more than 100 units. No essential recreational facilities are required in a small project, with less than ten dwelling units.
The proposed standards would not create any new capacity over and above that previously analyzed in the 2022 IS/ND, nor would they require or guarantee that development projects within the AHO
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 219
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
be developed at 30 du/ac, the maximum permitted prior to the application of any State density bonus. The proposed AHO would provide a streamlined permit approval process from what is now required for projects seeking a density bonus under the City’s residential density bonus program in Chapter 20.14 of the Zoning Ordinance, but would still allow for a checklist type of design review by the Planning Commission using the City’s Site Approval procedures.
Mixed Use Overlay
Implementation of Program 3C of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would apply the MUO to 173.2 acres of land as shown in Figure 3 and allow for development of housing at up to 30 du/ac to help the City meet its RHNA obligations. As with the AHO, use of the MUO would be voluntary, and property owners of sites to which it applies would still be able to develop or redevelop their properties consistent with the base zoning, which is largely non -residential. However, in the event that owners elect to develop higher density housing, compliance with the standards shown on Table 3 would be required.
Table 3
Development Standards for the MUO District
Feature Standard
Site Requirements
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 80 percent
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (non-residential space) 1.01
Building Requirements
Maximum Building Height 45 feet2
Minimum Setbacks (feet):
Front 10 feet; 15 feet if ground floor is residential3,5 Rear 10 feet; 15 feet adjacent to a Residential District Interior Side Zero feet; 10 feet adjacent to a Residential District
Street Side 10 feet3,4,5
Minimum Building Separations 15 feet
Other Requirements
Street curb cuts See Note 6
1Additional floor area ratio is allowed up to 1.25 in mixed use development with affordable rental units. The amount of additional floor area ratio shall be calculated based on the same proportional increase in density allowed for qualifying projects meeting affordable housing criteria. For example, if a project receives a 25 percent increase in density, then it receives a 25 percent increase in allowable floor area ratio. 2Additional height is allowed up to 55 feet for lots with 100 feet of street frontage to enable provision of common open space for recreational facilities. The upper story above 35 feet shall be setback back an additional seven feet from the interior property line if the project is adjacent to a Residential zoning district. 3A minimum 15 feet of front and street side setback shall be provided along primary and secondary arterial streets. A reduced front setback may be allowed on the following streets: Riverside, Central, and Euclid. 4A minimum 20-foot setback must be provided for garages and carports facing a street. 5Open or covered porches may be constructed in the front and street side setbacks to encroach no closer than 12 feet to the front property line and 5 feet to the street side property line. 6New street curb cuts are not allowed on lots with alley access unless approved by the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer to accommodate for affordable housing units.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 220
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
The proposed standards are based on the standards of the City's existing Mixed Use zoning district, with the following modifications intended to incentivize and support the financial feasibility of affordable housing projects:
• Covered Parking: In multi-family developments of 20 du/ac or more, parking may be either covered or uncovered and on-site parking shall be in the rear of buildings in the back half of the lot or development site.
• Building Heights: Additional height up to a maximum of 55 feet is available to projects if needed to ensure the adequate provision of the required common open spac e and on-site recreational amenities.
• Common Open Space: A minimum of 65 percent of the required outdoor living area shall be provided as common open space accessible to the living units on the lot with a minimum horizontal dimension of 20 feet.
• On-site Recreational Amenities: In lieu of the requirements of major and minor facilities in Section 20.17.050 (C) of the CMC which require more land than may be available in a high - density project, developments with a minimum of 25 dwelling units per gross adjusted acre may construct fewer on -site facilities provided they are of higher quality. Recreational facilities may include gyms; fitness rooms; space for yoga, dance, or other instruction; playing courts; children's play areas; picnic and barbeque areas; or children’s daycare space. At least 250 square feet per unit shall be provided for these recreational facilities, and there shall be a minimum of two of these facilities in projects with 10 -50 units, three of these facilities in projects with 51-100 units, and four or more of these facilities in projects with more than 100 units. No essential recreational facilities are required in a small project, with less than 10 dwelling units.
The proposed standards would not create any new capacity over and above that previously analyzed in the 2022 IS/ND, nor would they require or guarantee that development projects within the MUO be developed at 30 du/ac, the maximum permitted prior to the application of any State density bonus. The proposed MUO would provide a streamlined permit approval process from what is now required for projects seeking a density bonus under the City’s residential density bonus program in Chapter 20.14 of the Zoning Ordinance but would still allow for a checklist type of design review by the Planning Commission using the City’s Site Approval procedures.
Farmworker Housing
To implement state law and Housing Element policies regarding F armworker Housing, the project proposes zoning amendments that would permit Farmworker Housing with no more than 12 units or 36 beds by -right in agricultural zones without a Special Conditional Use Permit or any other discretionary review, such as a site approval. Th ese particular zoning amendments would support the City’s agricultural economy by providing housing for the labor force that works in the dairies, the fields, and in related agricultural businesses.
These zoning amendments would expand housing opportunities for farmworkers, as required by Assembly Bill (AB) 1783 (2019) and as envisioned in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 221
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
zoning amendments would establish a streamlined review process, with “b y-right” approvals, for qualifying projects (no more than 36 beds in group quarters or 12 single -family units). They also would require the City to treat a single- family dwelling housing six or fewer employees as a residential structure and single-family use, which would only need to meet the standards that apply to other single-family homes in the zoning district where it is located.
Qualifying projects would be exempt for environmental review and CEQA clearance. Large projects would have to be approved wi thin specified time limits and site approval by the Planning Commission would be required.
The proposed zoning amendments would set limits on where Farmworker Housing could be located (e.g., not in hazardous locations or in open space areas subject to a ha bitat conservation plan) and on the fees that can be charged (they cannot be different from those that would apply to other agricultural activities). The zoning amendments would include standards for setbacks, maximum height, minimum sleeping area in group quarters, outdoor living area and recreational facilities, exterior lighting, off-street parking setbacks, water and wastewater disposal, and minimum periods of occupancy.
Inclusionary Housing Program
The proposed Inclusionary Housing Program would ensure that a minimum amount of affordable housing units be built in new development, with an option for certain projects below a minimum size to pay a fee in lieu of producing the affordable units on-site. The program does not change the City’s land use regulat ions or the density set by base district zones or overlay zones. Therefore, the Inclusionary Housing Program would not have an impact on buildout under the General Pla n (GP) or the Zoning Ordinance as amended by the proposed AHO, MUO, or Farmworker Housing amendments.
Specific Plan Amendments
Some of the overlay sites are located within the boundaries of the East Chino, Majestic Spectrum, and Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan areas. Accordingly, these specific plans would be amended for consistency with the land use and development standards proposed for the overlays.
A summary of the amendments needed to each Specific Plan is provided below.
East Chino Specific Plan (ECSP)
• The following would be identified as a residential objective of the ECSP:
(a) Provide sites for affordable housing with an AHO and a MUO as established on the City’s Zoning Ordinance on land identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update; • Definitions for the AHO and MUO would be added to the list of overlay districts; • The table of Land Use Categories and Designations would be updated to incorporate the AHO and MUO;
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 222
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
• The description of site planning concepts would be updated to clarify that mixed use development in either a horizontal or vertical format is permitted in areas subject to the MUO and to stipulate standards for active ground floor frontages in those areas; and • Provisions establishing purpose, boundaries, permitted uses, site development standards, design guidelines, and affordability in both the AHO and MUO would be added to the section on Overlay District Regulations.
Eucalyptus Business Park Specific Plan (EBPSP)
• The Project Description would be amended to identify the AHO and MUO Overlay Designations among the major land use categories permitted; • The following would be identified among the primary goals of the EBPSP:
4. Provide opportunities for the development of affordable housing at appropriate locations, consistent with the General Plan Housing Element and Measure Y (2022); • Residential land uses consistent with th e 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would be identified as Land Use Objectives and Concepts;
• Figure IV-2 illustrating the location of overlay sites within the EBPSP would be added; and • Section of the EBPSP containing design guidelines and development regulations would be updated to clarify that Chapter 20.09 of the City of Chino Zoning Ordinance shall apply to housing projects proposed within the AHO and MUO.
Majestic Spectrum Specific Plan
• Amendment #16 would be added to the table of amend ments for the MUO, including date and ordinance number, and a description of the amendments would be added on page 45; • The section on Development Standards would be updated to clarify that Chapter 20.09 of the City of Chino Zoning Ordinance shall apply to housing projects proposed within the MUO;
• The section on Parking Standards would be updated to clarify that the standards of City of Chino Zoning Ordinance apply to residential -only and mixed -use development with residential units in the area subject to the MUO, and that no covered parking is required for residential and mixed-use development; and
• Text would be added to clarify that residential and mixed -use development in the MUO designated area are only subject to the development and design standards esta blished in Chapter 20.09 for the MUO, and that only these design standards shall be considered by the Planning Commission in the site approval process for projects in this area.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 223
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
General Plan Amendments
To ensure the internal consistency of the General Plan as required under State law, the following targeted amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan would be made:
• Figure LU-2 General Plan Land Use would be amended to show the location of the overlay sites.
• Figure LU-3 Future Growth Plan would be amended to remove overlay sites shown on this map, given that the process for development of Focused Growth Plan parcels outlined in the General Plan has been completed with the adoption of the zoning amendments for the overlays.
• Under Objective LU-1.1, add Policy P4:
Allow for high density residential development at up to 30 du/ac within the Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Zoning Overlays consistent with Measure Y, approved by Chino voters in June 2022.
13. Other Required Agency Approvals or Permits Required California State Department of Housing and Community Development
14. New Significant Environmental Effects or Substantially More Severe Environmental Effects Compared to Those Identified in the Previous CEQA Document The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or to be previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change in project, change in circumstances or new information of substantial impo rtance, as indicated by the checklist and discussion on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 224
RECON Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update
15. Determination
Based on all available information in light of the entire record, the analysis in this Addendum, and pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City has determined the following:
• There are no substantial changes proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
• Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or • There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous environmental document was certified as complete or was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous environmental document;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous environmental document;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different frorn those analyzed in the previous environmental would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Based upon a review of the current project, none of the situations described in Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines apply. No changes in circumstances have occurred, and no new information of substantial importance has manifested, which would result in new significant or substantially increased adverse impacts as a result of the project. Therefore, this Addendum has been prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update IS/ND has been incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. Public review of this Addendum is n t required per CEQA.
Date
Michael Hitz, AICP, Principal Planner City of Chino
Printed Name and Title For
Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 225
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
15.1 Aesthetics
Scenic Vistas
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that all future development projects would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and would be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as specific plan design guidelines to ensure that any proposed building heights would be consistent with the scale of surrounding and existing development. Therefore, future housing development would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Although the project would increase the allowable density at certain sites, which could increase development intensity, all future housing development would be subject to applicable City GP policies, CMC standards, and Specific Plan design guidelines that ensure future building designs would be compatible with the surrounding environment , as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Although the project would allow for increased building heights within the AHO and MUO, buildings allowed an additional floor would be subject to clustering requirements that would reduce the potential of blocking views. Furthermore, buildings allowed an additional floor would be located in areas surrounded by existing development that do not afford views. Therefore, the project would not have a new or substantially greater adverse effect on a scenic vista than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Scenic Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that there are no eligible or officially designated scenic highways within the boundaries of the City. The nearest eligible state scenic highway is a segment of SR -91 located approximately 0.25 miles south of the City’s southern boundary. The nearest officially designated highway is a segment of SR-55 approximately four miles southwest of the City’s southern boundary.
The 2022 IS/ ND determined that adherence to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, including those intended to protect scenic resources, would ensure that future housing development would not substantially damage scenic resources, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, all future housing development would be subject to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, including those intended to protect scenic resources, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore,
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 226
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
the project would not result in new or substantial ly greater damage to any scenic resources than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Visual Character and Quality
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that adherence to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards that would be verified through the City’s development review process, would ensure that future housing development would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Additionally, all future housing developmen t would be subject to the applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, including those that protect against degradation of visual resources by requiring project modifications, as needed, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. While the project changes could allow for more intense development at certain housing sites, adherence to the applicable City GP policies and CMC standards would continue to regulate setbacks, height, bulk, and design in the same manner as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, t he project would not result in new or substantially greater impacts relating to the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Light and Glare
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that adherence to applicable requirements concerning light and glare as required in the California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) Code (Title 24 Part 11) and the City GP, as well as applicable design guidelines listed in The Preserve EIR for relevant projects , would ensure that future housing development would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. While there could be an increase in density at some locations consistent with the latest version of the Housing Element Update, all future housing development would be subject to the applicable requirements concerning light and glare as required in the CALGreen Code (Title 24 Part 11) and the City GP, as well as applicable design guidelines listed in The Preserve EIR for relevant projects, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not create a new or substantially greater source of light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 227
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
15.2 Agriculture Resources
Important Farmland
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be located in areas tha t were evaluated for impacts to important farmland in the City GP EIR, The Preserve EIR , Edgewater Communities Specific Plan (Edgewater) EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum . The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update did not include any sites that were not evaluated in these previous environmental documents. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts related to the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non -agricultural use beyond what was evaluated in the previous environmental documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in greater impacts related to the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Agricultural Zoning and Williamson Act
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that none of the candidate housing sites would be located on properties currently zoned for agricultural uses. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that while candidate housing sites would not be located on properties protected by active Williamson Act contracts, some housing would be located on properties with contracts in non -renewal within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas. However, contracts in non-renewal have already been planned for urban uses, and associated impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable under The Preserve EIR and Edgewater EIR. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts related to conflicts with Williamson Act contracts beyond what was evaluated in the City GP EIR, Preserve EIR, or Edgewater EIR, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in greater impacts related to conflicts with existing agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contracts than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 228
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Forest Land Zoning
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined there is no forest land or timberland located within the City. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as de fined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)). No impact would occur.
Project
There is no change to the analysis provided in the 2022 IS/ND. No forest land or timberland, or land zoned as forest land are located within the City. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would occur.
Forest Land
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined there is no forest land or timberland located within the City. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not r esult in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur.
Project
There is no change to the analysis provided in the 2022 IS/ND. No forest land or timberland are located within the City. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would occur.
Indirect Conversion
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be located in areas that were evaluated for impacts to important farmland in the City GP EIR, Preserve EIR , Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that future development would be required to comply with right-to-farm provisions and use compatibility findings that would promote continued agricultural use on areas specifically designated for long-term agricultural use. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts related to indirect conversion of farmland beyond what was evaluated in the City GP EIR, Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore,
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 229
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
the project would not result in greater impacts related to indirect conversion of farmland than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.3 Air Quality
Consistency with Air Quality Plans
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Additionally, future housing development would also be subject the City’s development review process , which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as required to adhere to all federal, state, and local regulations for minimizing construction and oper ational pollutant emissions, including applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not c onflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2016 AQMP, and impa cts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Although the project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites , all future housing development would be subject to the applicable City GP policies and CMC standards , as well as required to adhere to all federal , state, and local regulations for minimizing construct ion and operational pollutant emissions, including applicable SCAQMD Rules, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in greater conflicts or obstructions with the 2016 AQMP than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Cumulative Net Increases of Criteria Pollutants
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Additionally, future housing development would also be subject the City’s development review process and would be required to demonstrate compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations in effect at the time of development, including applicable City GP policies and CMC standards . Furthermore, future housing development would be required to demonstrate that volatile organ ic compounds (VOC), oxides of nitrogen ( NOX), carbon monoxide ( CO), oxides of sulfur ( SOX), particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter ( PM10), and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter ( PM2.5) emissions would be below the significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 230
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
for which the Southern California Air Basin is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process and required to demonstrate compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations in effect at the time of development, including applicable City GP policies and CMC standards. Furthermore, future housing development would be required to demonstrate that VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions would be below the significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities.
Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project re gion is non- attainment, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Sensitive Receptors
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ ND determined that c ompliance with various measures (e.g., 13 California Code of Regulations [CCR] 2449 and 13 CCR 2485) required by state law would reduce diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions to below acceptable thresholds. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that future housing development would require further evaluation through the City’s development review process to demonstrate that both daily construction emissions and operations would not exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds for any criteria air pollutant. Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 202 2 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to comply with various measures (e.g., 1 3 CCR 2449 and 13 CCR 2485) required by s tate law that would reduce DPM emissions to below acceptable thresholds.
Similarly, future housing development would require further evaluation through the City’s development review process to demonstrate that both daily construction emissions and operations would not exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds for any criteria air pollutant. Furthermore,
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 231
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
candidate Housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Ed gewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the project would not e xpose sensitive receptors to new or substantial ly greater pollutant concentrations than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Odors
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that while construction of future housing development could result in odors generated from vehicles and/or equipment exhaust emissions , such odors would be temporary and disperse rapidly. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update did not propose any development, nor include any land uses, which have been identified by the SCAQMD as operational odor sources. Therefore, the 202 2 IS/ND determined that the future housing development would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the project would not introduce any odor generating land uses that were not considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not generate a greater amount of emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.4 Biological Resources
Sensitive Species
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be located in areas that were previously evaluated in the City GP EIR, Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts on sensitive species beyond what was evaluated in the previous environmental documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not have a new or substantially greater adverse effect on any sensitive species than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 232
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Riparian Habitat and other Sensitive Natural Communities 2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development located in areas that were previously evaluated in the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Furthermore, a ll future housing development would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local requirements, including applicable City GP policies. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts on riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities beyond what was evaluated in the previous environmental documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not have a new or substantial ly greater adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less th an significant. No new impact would occur.
Wetlands
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that most development would occur above the 566-foot elevation line where wetlands and jurisdictional waters are extremely limited and w ould not have an impact on these sensitive biological resources. Future housing development located in areas that were previously evaluated in the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts on wetlands beyond what was evaluated in the previous environmental documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not have a new or substantially greater adverse effect on state o r federally protected wetlands than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant . No new impact would occur.
Wildlife Movement and Nursery Sites
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that wildlife movement in the City is generally constrained by traffic on major roadways such as SR -71, SR-60, SR-83 (Euclid Avenue), and Central Avenue. Furthermore, buildout of the City would not allow expanded development in the southern portion of the City,
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 233
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
allowing existing wildlife c onnects to remain. Per the City GP EIR, the Resource Management Plan (RMP) for The Preserve provides the framework for coordinating the City’s actions with other agencies, including the County, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife , the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , and associated water districts. It is intended to protect biological resources identified in The Preserve EIR, including burrowing owl habitat, raptor foraging habitat, migratory bird and waterfowl ha bitat, federally and state listed species, waters of the U.S., waters of California and other water resources available to wildlife. As such, candidate housing site that are located within The Preserve would adhere to measures identified in the RMP to protect biological resources identified in The Preserve EIR. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts on wildlife movement or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. No impact would occur.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not have a new or substantially greater adverse effect on wildlife movement or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites than previously analyzed. No new impact would occur.
Policies and Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources 2022 IS/ND
CMC Chapter 12.16 protects important street trees in the City. Future development allowed in the City are subject to these regulations. Candidate h ousing sites located within areas evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Add endum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts related to conflicts with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources beyond w hat was evaluated in the previous environmental documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that w ere not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater conflict with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Habitat Conservation Planning
2022 IS/ND
The County Riparian Plan Conservation Ordinance and the RMP are plans related to biological resources. The County Riparian Plan Conservation Ordinance prohibits the removal of any vegetation within two hundred feet of the bank of a stream or in an area indicated as a protected riparian area.
Candidate housing sites located within areas evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 234
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework .
Furthermore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and would be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local regulations regarding biological resources. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in impacts related to conflicts with habitat conservation planning beyond what was evaluated in the previous environme ntal documents, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater conflict with habitat conservation planning than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.5 Cultural Resources
Historic Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that n one of the candidate housing sites within the future AHO and MUO overlay zones were classified as an existing historical and cultural resources. Candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Furthermore, all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local regulations for avoiding impacts to historical resource s, including the National Historic Preservation Act. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a n historical resource pursuant to §15064.5 , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause a new or substantially greater adverse change in the significance of an historical resource pursuant to §15064.5 than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 235
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Archaeological Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that all future housing development on the candidate housing sites in the City would be reviewed to confirm compliance with all applicable requirements, including the City’s development review process, and required to adhere to all f ederal, state, and local requirements for avoiding impacts to archeological resources. This includes compliance with the City GP, which includes goals aimed at reducing archeological impacts. Candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not cause an advers e change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not cause a new or substantially greater substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Human Remains
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that i n the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, the provisions set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would be implemented in consultation with the assigned Most Likely Descendant (MLD) as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). In the event human remains are encountered , no further con struction activities would be permitted until the coroner is contacted, as well as any applicable Native American tribes. The City would be required to comply with the California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (2001) and the Federal Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1990). Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that adherence to these provisions would ensure that impacts related to human remains would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make an y changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater impacts on human remains than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 236
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
15.6 Energy
Wasteful, Inefficient, or Unnecessary Consumption of Energy 2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that there are no unusual characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or s tate. Design and materials used for future housing sites would be subject to compliance with the most current building energy efficiency standards. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the City would review and verify that p roject plans comply with the current version of the building and e nergy efficiency standards. The p roject would also be required to adhere to the provisions of CALGreen, which establishes planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be subject to the most current b uilding energy efficiency standards and CALGreen energy efficiency standards , as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Conflict with State or Local Energy Plans
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be required to obtain permits and comply with federal, state, and local regulations aimed at reducing energy consumption. Federal and state energy regulations, such as the California Energy Code Building Energy Efficiency Standards (CCR Title 24, Part 6), the CALGreen Code (CCR Title 24, Part 11), and Senate Bill (SB) 743 transportation-related impact analysis requirements would also be imposed through future development permit review to minimize future energy consumption. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 237
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to obtain permits and comply with f ederal, state, and local regulations aimed at reducing energy consumption, and adhere to other applicable requirements, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater conflicts with or obstructions of a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.7 Geology and Soils
Seismic Hazards
2022 IS/ND
Fault Rupture
The 2022 IS/ND determined that there is only one active fault ( Chino-Central Avenue Fault) that crosses the City, with two segments that run roughly south-east to north-west and are found on the western edge of the City and just to the west in the City of Chino Hills. This fault is not expected to rupture and therefore is not mapped according t o the Alquist-Priolo Act. Candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Furthermore, all future housing development would be required to demonstrate compliance with f ederal, state, and local regulations in effect at the time of development, including applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as seismic design guidelines and requirements contained in the current Title 24 –California Standards Building Code (CBC). Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people or structures to rupture of a known earthquake fault, and impacts would be less than significant.
Seismic Ground Shaking
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City is located in the seismically active southern California region. Candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte are as were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Furthermore, all future housing development would be required to comply with the seismic design guidelines and requirements contained in the current CBC. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people or structures to strong seismic ground shaking, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 238
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Seismic-R elated Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction The 2022 IS/ND determined that the areas within the City most susceptible to liquefaction are located in the southern portion of The Preserve, near the Prado Dam. Candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Furthermore, all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local requirements. The City requires the inclusion of a Soils Engineering Report ( per CMC Chapter
19.08) in the grading plans. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people or structures to seismic-r
elated ground failure, including liquefaction, and
impacts would be less than significant.
Landslides
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City is relatively flat, and the candidate housing sites would be located within urbanized areas that are relatively f lat. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people or structures to landslides , and no impact would occur.
Project
Fault Rupture
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater adverse effects involving fault rupture than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Seismic Ground Shaking
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater adverse effects involving seismic ground shaking than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Seismic-R elated Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially gr eater adverse effects involving s eismic -r
elated
ground failure, including liquefaction, than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 239
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Landslides
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater adverse effects involving landslides than previously analyzed. No new impact would occur.
Soil Erosion
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process , which may include review pursuant to CEQA , and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local requirements for avoiding and minimizing impacts concerning soil erosion or loss of topsoil.
Prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities, future project applicants would be required to demonstrate compliance with the CMC including requirements pertaining to erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Short -term construction -related erosion would be addressed through compliance with the National Pollution Discharge and Elimination Syste m program, which requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and best management practices (BMPs) intended to reduce soil erosion. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater soil erosion or loss of topsoil than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Unstable Geology and Expansive Soils
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to adhere to all f ederal, state, and local requirements, including the City’s building and c onstruction codes (CMC Title 15). Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in on - or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction , o r collapse or create substantial direct or indirect risks associated with expansive soils, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 240
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not create new or substantially greater impacts related to on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse , or direct or ind irect risks associated with expansive soils than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Septic Systems
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that all future housing development would be located in urbanized areas served by the City’s existing sanitary sewer system. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people or structures to landslides , and no impact would occur. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not utilize septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems, and no impact would occur.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause new or substantially greater adverse effects involving septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems than previously analyzed. No new impact would occur.
Paleontological Resources and Unique Geology
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that earthwork activities associated with future housing development would have the potential to encounter pale ontological resource s. However, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal and state regulations regarding paleontological resources. Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not cause a new or substantially greater adverse change in the significance of a
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 241
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development could potentially result in an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, CEQA evaluation, and plan check process, which may require future applicants prepare air quality and GHG emission studies using the California Emissions Estimator Model. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that candidate housing sites, including projected ADUs and future AHO and MUO sites, would be located in urbanized areas of the City in either existing residential or non -residential land use designation and zoning that were evaluated in the City GP EIR. As discussed in the Chino GP EIR, Chino GP objectives AQ-1.1 and AQ-1.2 aim to preserve and improve air quality in the City and the region by reducing emissions through VMT reduction.
The Chino GP EIR analyzed the VMTs in the City boundary for the Chino GP, which included the candidate housing site areas. Therefore, the City GP EIR considered potential VMT associated with development of the candidate housing site areas , which would offset VMT from future residential development facilitated by the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update.
Future housing development would also be required to meet the mandatory energy requirements of CALGreen and the California Energy Code (CCR Title 24, Part 6) in effect at the time of development. These regulations require that new development incorporate design features to capture energy efficiencies associated with building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning mechanical systems, water heating systems, and lighting. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not g enerate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to th e candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND,. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to meet the mandatory energy requirements of CALGreen and the California Energy Code (CCR Title 24, Part 6) in effect at the time of development, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not generate new or substantially greater GHG emissions than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 242
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Policies, Plans and Regulations to Reduce GHG Emissions 2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND documented that the City adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in 2013, consistent with an identified objective in the City’s GP for the City to achieve a reduction in GHG emissions. In November 2020, the City adopted the Climate Action Update 2020 -2030, which includes the new GHG inventory emissions for the City, forecast and target setting through 2030, reduction measures to m eet the GHG reduction goals for 2030, adaptation, and implementation. Future housing development would adhere to the Climate Action Update 2020 -2030 GHG reduction measures.
Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and theref ore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to adhere to the Climate Action Update 2020-2030 GHG reduction measures. Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater conflicts with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
15.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that d emolition and construction activities associated with future housing development would require transport of hazar dous materials (e.g., asbestos containing materials, lead-based paint, and/or contaminated soils). However, this transport would be limited in duration, and construction activities would be subject to City and Department of Toxic Substances Control standards and regulations regarding the storage, handling, and use of hazardous materials.
Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Future housing development would not involve ongoing or routine use of substantial quantities of hazardous materials during operations (occupancy of future housing). Only s mall quantities of hazardous materials would be anticipated
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 243
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
including cleaning solvents, fertilizers, pesticides, and other materials used in regular maintenance.
Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the project would not introduce any land uses that generate or use hazardous materials that were not considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the pr oject would not result in new or substantially greater significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Accidental Release
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that excavation and grading activities associated with future housing development could expose construction workers and the general public to unknown hazardous materials present in soil or groundwater. However, future housing development would be reviewed to confirm compliance with all applicable requirements, including the City’s development review process, and be subject to compliance with the established regulatory framework for minimizing upset associated with hazardous materials. Additionally, development of candidate housing sites would generate less hazardous materials compared to what would be generated under more intensive commercial, industrial, and mixed use s. Furthermore, future housing development within The Preserve would adhere to The Preserve EIR mitigation measure HM-3, which requires preparation of a project-specific Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for any property currently or historically involving hazardous materials or waste . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the project would not introduce any land uses that generate or use hazardous materials that were not considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably fo reseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 244
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Emissions Near a School
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development could potentially be located within
0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school . However, future housing development would not typically emit hazardous materials, substances, and wastes that are more hazardous than that of more intense uses such as commercial, ind ustrial, and mixed uses. Furthermore, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable regulations related to the emissions or handling of hazardous materials, substances, or wastes near schools. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not e mit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Hazardous Materials Sites
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND documented that the City GP EIR four contaminated sites in the City, most of which had subsequently been cleaned and their cases are closed . None of the hazardous materials sites documented within The Preserve EIR were found to pose an immediate threat to human or environmental health, and The Edgewater EIR did not identify any hazardous materials sites within the Rancho Miramonte area. As such, none of the candidate housing sites are included on the hazardous sites list compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not be located on a site which is included in a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact would occur.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential impact related to sites included in a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 245
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Airport Hazards
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards to ensure consistency with the required setback and height restrictions for the Chino Airport as determin ed by the Federal Aviation Administration , Chino Airport Master Plan, and the Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the area, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be subject to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards to ensure consistency with the required setback and height restrictions for the Chino Airport as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration , Chino Airport Master Plan , and the Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential impact related to a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the area than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Emergency Response
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update did not anticipate any changes to the City’s existing circulation network. Furthermore, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Section 19.06, which requires developers to include suitabl e site access for emergency vehicles. Furthermore, the City would continue to implement the Standardized Emergency System Management Plan (Emergency Operations Plan) and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to improve accessibility for emergency response personnel and vehicles and reduce and/or eliminate risk in the City . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not i mpair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Section 19.06, which requires developers to include suitable site access for emergency vehicles.
Furthermore, the City would continue to implement the Standardized Emergency System Management Plan (Emergency Operations Plan) and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to improve accessibility for emergency response personnel and vehicles and reduce and/or eliminate risk in the
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 246
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
City. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to i mpair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Wildland Fires
2022 IS/ND
See Section 15.20 Wildfire below.
Project
See Section 15.20 Wildfire below.
15.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Water Quality
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as adhere to the established regulatory f ramework pertaining to water quality . Construction activities would be required to comply with a project-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies erosion-control and sediment -control BMPs that would meet or exceed measures required by the construction activity general permit to control potential construction-related pollutants. Erosion-control BMPs are designed to prevent erosion, whereas sediment controls are designed to trap sediment once it has been mobilized. Additionally, future housing development would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 13.25 (Part III – Residential Requirements) pertaining to residential stormwater discharge prohibitions and existing water quality standards and waste discharge regulations set forth by the State Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality , and impac ts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impact on water quality than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 247
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Groundwater
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that development of vacant candidate housing sites would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin . Additionally, c andidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined tha t future housing development would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that they may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially grea ter impact on groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Drainage Patterns/Storm Water Runoff
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that fut ure housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local requirements for avoiding impacts that could substantially alter the existing drainage pattern or alter the course of a stream or river. Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not substantially alter the existing drainage patterns or increase storm water runoff, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impact related to drainage patterns or storm water runoff than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 248
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Flood Hazard, Tsunami, and Seiche
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City is located approximately 42 miles inland eastward from the Pacific Ocean, and that the potential to be inundated by a large, catastrophic tsunami is extremely low. No ste ep slopes are in the vicinity of the City, and the risk of mudflow is insignificant.
Additionally, the Federal Emergency Management Agency classifies most of the City as Flood Hazard Zone X, which is identified as 500-year floodplain, an area of minimal flood hazard. Furthermore, all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local requirements for avoiding and minimizing impacts related to flood hazards, tsunami, or seiches. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in inundation from flood hazards, tsunamis, or seiches, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impact related to inundation from flood hazards, tsunamis, or seiches than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant .
No new impact would occur.
Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan 2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development is City is unlikely to impact groundwater, as groundwater resources are managed and monitored by the Chino Basin Optimum Basin Management P rogram. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local requirements for avoiding and minimizing conflicts with or obstruction of implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Further more, future housing development Housing Element Update would not prevent the City’s Clean Water Program from ensuring that Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System p ermit and Optimum Basin Management Program Chino Basin Plan requirements are met. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing s ite inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater c onflicts with or obstruct ion of
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 249
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
implementation a water quality contr ol plan or sustainable groundwater management plan , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.11 Land Use and Planning
Physically Divide an Established Community
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would largely occur in urbanized areas and in areas currently zoned with allowed residential uses. The 2022 IS/ND also determined that future housing development would not require substantial road-widenings or other features which could potentially divide the established community. Additionally, candidate housing sites were identified throughout the City rather than concentrated in a single area. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not physically divide an established community, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the project would not introduce any new land uses whose nature could divide an established community that were not considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not physically divide an established community greater than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Conflicts with Plans and Policies
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update was developed consistent with s tate housing law, and therefore was consistent with applicable land use and planning policies in the state, regional, and local context. Additionally, future housing development would be reviewed for consistency with all applicable land use and planning policies and regulations intended to minimize environmental effects . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND . Therefore, the project would not result in greater conflicts with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 250
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
15.12 Mineral Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the only potentially mineral resources located in the City are aggregate materials that may be found in areas designated as MRZ-3, land for which the significance of mineral resources cannot be determined , which is not considered a significant mineral resource.
Additionally, the 2022 IS/ND did not identify properties delineated as a mineral resource recovery site within the City. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or impact any mineral resource recovery sites. No impact would occur.
Project
There is no change to the analysis provided in the 2022 IS/ND. No significant mineral resources or mineral resource recovery sites are located within the City. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would occur.
15.13 Noise
Noise Standards
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that construction of future housing development is anticipated to occur in incremental phases over time based on market demand, economic, and planning considerations and would not be concentrated in any one particular area of the City . Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Chapter
9.40 (Noise). Once constructed, future housing development would not be expected to significantly increase traffic volume on local roadways g iven the City’s largely developed nature. Most of the identified candidate housing sites in future overlay zones are within urbanized portions of the City already generating traffic volumes and mobile noises. Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within areas evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of established standards, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Chapter
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 251
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
9.40 (Noise), as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within areas evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of established standards than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Groundborne Noise and Vibration
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to the City’s standard discretionary review process, including compliance with the City’s GP, C MC, and site-specific CEQA review. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, the project would not introduce any land uses that generate groundborne noise or vibration that were not considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Aircraft Noise
2022 IS/ND
The Chino Airport is a public airport owned by the County and is located within the City, just northwest of The Preserve area. The next closest public airport to the City is the Ontario International Airport, which is located approximately 2.8 miles east o f the City’s eastern boundary. There are no private airstrips located in the City. As described in Section 15.9 above, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with any existing airport land use plan.
Furthermore, candidate housing sites located within areas evaluated under the Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential impact related to exposure of
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 252
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
15.14 Population and Housing
Induce Unplanned Population Growth
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update was a component of statewide housing legislation. Therefore, housing and population growth associated with the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would be in accordance with state-level regulation and would not be considered unplanned. Additionally, future housing development would occur in urbanized locations near existing u tilities and service systems, and areas already served by public services (e.g., police and fire protection, and other emergency responders). Furthermore, future housing developments would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may incl ude review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as an assessment on a project -by-project basis for potential effects concerning population growth.
Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units, compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional units would add to the existing buffer that allows the City to navigate the "no net loss” provisions of the State Housing Element law in the event that sites on the inventory do not develop as projected in the Housing Element. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the increased development potential of the project would induce population growth beyond what is anticipated by regional growth projections for the City that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update was developed to accommodate. Therefore, the project would not induce new or substantially greater impacts related to unplanned population growth than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Displace People or Housing
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City would comply with the requirements of SB 166 that a jurisdiction maintain an inventory at all times that can accommodate its share of the regional housing need throughout the planning period . Additionally, the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update’s candidate housing site inventory would be sufficient to accommodate the City’s RHNA allocation.
The candidate housing site inventory included 3,397 unit low and very-low income RHNA need, as well as a 39 percent buffer for those income categories. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 253
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any ch anges to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not result in redevelopment of any existing housing sites beyond what was considered in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impacts relating to the displacement of existing people or housing than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.15 Public Services
Fire Protection
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that f uture housing development would increase demand for fire protection services over time. However, vacant candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas near infrastructure that are already served by the Chino Valley Independent Fire District. Additionally, c andidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR and the Edgewater EIR and 2016 Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. All future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with City GP policies, CMC Chapter 15.32 (Fire Code), and the 2019 California Fire Code. Future projects would also be subject t o Development Impact Fees (DIF). Tax revenue generated from their development would support public goods, such as fire protection services .
Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because vacant candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas near infrastructure that are already served by the Chino Valley Independent Fire District. Additionally, c andidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR and the Edgewater EIR and 2016 Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND . Furthermore, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with City GP policies, CMC Chapter 15.32 (Fire Code), and the 2019 California Fire Code.
Future projects would also be subject to DIFs. Tax revenue generated from their development would support public goods, such as fire protection services, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for new or altered fire protection service facilities than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 254
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Police Protection
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that f uture housing development would increase demand for police protection services over time. However, vacant candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas near infrastructure that are already served by the Chino Police Department.
Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR , the Edgewater EIR , and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. All future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process under CEQA and DIFs. Tax revenue generated from their development would support public goods, such as police protection services. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because vacant candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas near infrastructure that are already served by the Chino Police Department. Additionally, c andidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR , the Edgewater EIR , and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Furthermore, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process under CEQA and DIF s. Tax revenue generated from their development would support public goods, such as police protection services, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for new or altered police protection facilities than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Schools
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would generate student population growth in Chino Valley Unified School District that would increase demand for school services and facilities over time . However, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR , the Edgewater EIR , and the 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework.
Additionally, all future housing development would be subject to school impact fees imposed through the Education Code, pursuant to Government Code Section 65996, that are deemed to be full mitigation for new development projects . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 255
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make a ny changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, the Edgewater EIR, and the 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Additionally, all future housing development would be subject to school impact fees imposed through the Education Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65996, that are deemed to be full mitigati on for new development projects, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for new or altered school facilities than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Parks
2022 IS/ND
See Section 15.16 Recreation below.
Project
See Section 15.16 Recreation below.
Other Public Facilities
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would generate demand for public services and facilities over time. However, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, the Edgewater EIR, and the 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mi tigation framework.
Additionally, demand would be at least partially offset by funding generated by development fees and by tax revenue of higher numbers of residents. Therefore, the PEIR determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not resul t in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered public facilities than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 256
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, the Edgewater EIR, and the 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Additionally, demand would be at least partially offset by funding gene rated by development fees and by tax revenue of higher numbers of residents, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for new or altered public facilities, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.16 Recreation
Increased Use of Parks and Recreation Facilities
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that f uture housing development would increase demand and use of City park resources. However, future housing d evelopment would be subject to DIF s that would provide funds to build new parks or make capital improvements to existing parks, and/or extend the existing park system. Additionally, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR and the Edgewater EIR and 2016 Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all fut ure housing development would be subject to DIFs that would provide funds to build new parks or make capital improvements to existing parks, and/or extend the existing park system, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Additionally, c andidate housing sites loca ted within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR and the Edgewater EIR and 2016 Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND.
Therefore, the project would not cause a new or substantially greater increase in the deterioration of recreational facilities than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 257
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Recreation Facilities
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would increase demand for park and recreation facilities over time. However, candidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR and the Edgewater EIR and 2016 Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework. Additionally, future expansion of existing recreation facilities or construction of new recreation facilities would be subject to environmental review under CEQA requirements and would be required to comply with any applicable development review actions related to the expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because c andidate housing sites located within The Preserve and Rancho Miramonte areas were previously evaluated in The Preserve EIR, Edgewater EIR, and 2016 Edgewater EIR Addendum and would be subject to the applicable mitigation framework as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Additionally, future expansion of existing recreation facilities or construction of new recreation facilities would be subject to environmental review under CEQA requirements and would be required to comply with any applicable development review actions related to the expansion of recreational facilities , as documented in the 2022 IS/ND.
Therefore, the project would not cause a new or substantially greater increase in the amount of recreational facilities that may have an adverse physical effect on the environment than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.17 Transportation
Circulation System
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that f uture housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards concerning public transit and pedestrian facilities. This includes policies and regulations to improve public access and safety for people who walk and bike, and improve the transportation system, as applicable. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 258
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not ch ange the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards concerning public transit and pedestrian facilities, including policies and regulation s to improve public access, safety for people who walk and bike, and improve the transportation system, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater conflicts with a plan, ordinance, or policy add ressing the circulation system than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Vehicle Miles Traveled
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that most candidate housing sites were located within urban and developed areas, and therefore would be expected to reduce VMT . Additionally, future housing development would be required to adhere to all state and local requirements for avoiding significant impacts related to VMT, as well as the City’s VMT guidelines, in accordance with SB 743. Any traffic demand measures required for mitigation would be required to comply with City GP Goal TRA -1, which encourages the development and maintenance of efficient street network and roadway capacities and minimization of traffic hazards near residential uses. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because all future housing development would be required to adhere to all state and local requirements for avoiding significant impacts related to VMT , as well as the City’s VMT guidelines, in accordance with SB 743 , as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result i n new or substantially greater conflicts or inconsistencies with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Hazards Due to a Design Feature
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined tha t f uture housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA , comply with applicable
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 259
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
City GP policies and CMC standards , and be evaluated at the p roject-level for the potential to increase hazards due to a geometric design feature. Future housing development would also be required to comply with applicable building and fire safety regulations for the design of new housing and emergency access, as well as applicable state and local requirements for avoiding construction and operations impacts related to design and incompatible uses. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be subject to
the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA , comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards , and be evaluated at the project-level for the potential to increase hazards due to a geometric design feature, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Future housing development would also be required to comply with applicable building and fire safety regulations for the design of new housing and emergency access, as well as applicable state and local requirements for avoiding construction and operations impacts related to design and incompatible uses, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Emergency Access
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City has adopted the California Fire Code in compliance with Government Code Section 65850.7, under CMC Chapter 15.32. The California Fire Code sets standards for fire safety features. Additionally, more stringent CBC standards also apply regarding new construction and development of emergency access issues associated with ea rthquakes, flooding, climate/strong winds, and water shortages. A ccording to the City GP, the City has established emergency preparedness procedures to anticipate and respond to potential natural and manmade disasters in its Emergency Operations Plan adopted in September 2008 . The City also updated the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2018, whose intent is to reduce and/or eliminate loss of life and property. Furthermore, f uture housing development would be required to comply with applicable building and fir e safety regulations requiring the new housing development to be designed and constructed to provide adequate roadway access emergency access and evacuation route access. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not result in inadequate emergency access, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not ev aluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be required to comply with applicable building and fire safety regulations requiring the new housing development to be designed and constructed to provide adequate roadway access emergency acc ess and evacuation route access , as documented in the
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 260
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impact related to inadequate emergency access than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
15.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as well as applicable federal, state, and local regulations for avoiding impacts to tribal cultural resources . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not c ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The City initiated consultation with the Native American tribes who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project consistent with the requirements of SB 18. The City received responses from five tribes. The Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California , Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe , and Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians did not request additional consultation. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians: Kizh Nation requested consultation for future housing to be developed under the project. The City will comply with this request by notifying the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians: Kizh Nation and other tribes who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project as future housing is developed.
Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Utility Infrastructure
2022 IS/ND
Water
The 2022 IS/ND determined that unplanned proposed candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas of the City with existing residential or non -residential land use designation and zoning where water infrastructure already exists. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to adhere to City GP policies and the CMC standards. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities that could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 261
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Wastewater
The 2022 IS/ND determined that unplanned proposed candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas of the City with existing residential or non -residential land use designation and zoning where wastewater infrastructure already exists. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to adhere to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not require or result in the relocation or construct ion of new or expanded wastewater facilities that could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
Dry Utilities
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be located in urbanized areas of the City are already served by electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. Most of the candidate housing sites are developed and connect to existing dry utility infrastructure.
Additionally, housing and population growth associated with the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update would be consistent with regional and local plans used to guide infrastructure development.
Furthermore, future housing development would be required to meet the mandatory requirements under the City’s various programs aimed at ensuring adequate supplies and service infrastructure are available to serve the development. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or exp anded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities that could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
Water
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas of the City with existing residential or non-residential land use designation and zoning where water infrastructure already exists. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to adhere to City GP policies a nd the CMC standards , as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities that could cause significant environmental effects than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Wastewater
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 262
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because candidate housing sites would be located in urbanized areas of the City with existing residential or non-residential land use designation and zoning where wastewater infrastructure already exists. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to adhere to applicable City GP policies and CMC standards, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities that could cause significant environmental effects than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Dry Utilities
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND beca use future housing development would be located in urbanized areas of the City are already served by electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. M ost of the candidate housing sites are developed and connect to existing dry utility infrastructure. Furthermore, future housing development would be required to meet the mandatory requirements under the City’s various programs aimed at ensuring adequate supplies and service infrastructure are available to serve the development, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater need for relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities that could cause significant environmental effe cts than previously analyzed , and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Water Supply
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, adequate water supplies are projected to be available to meet the City’s estimated water demand for normal, dry, and multiply dry weather years through the year 2045. Additional supplies beyond those identified in the City ’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan would also be available, as the City has the flexibility to increase groundwater production from the Chino Basin. All future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and would be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Title 13 (Water, Sewers, and Utilities) regulations. Future housing development satisfying certain criteria would be required to prepare a Water Supply Assessment in order to verify sufficient water supply is available to meet project demand. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would have sufficient water supplies during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 263
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because the City ’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan projected that adequate water supplies would be available to meet the City’s estimated water demand for normal, dry, and multiply dry weather years through the year 2045. Additional supplies beyond those identified in the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan would also be available as the City has the flexibility to increase groundwater production from the Chino Basin. All future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and would be required to comply with applicable City GP policies and CMC Title 13 (Water, Sewers, and Utilities) regulations, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater impact related to sufficient water supplies during normal, dry and multiple dry years, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Wastewater Treatment
2022 IS/ND
The City is served by three wastewater treatment plants: Regional Plant 1 in the City of Ontario, Carbon Canyon Wastewater Facility in the City, and Regional Plant 5 in the City . All three facilities have a combined capacity of 71.7 million gallons per day. The Chino Basin Regional Sewer Service Contract requires a capacity of 270 gallons per day per ho using unit. The 2022 IS/ND determined that previously unplanned housing units would generate a demand of 1.3 million gallons per day over the span of 2021-2029 planning period, which would be well within the existing capacity of the combined treatment plan ts. Additionally, f uture housing development would be subject to discretionary permits and be required to adhere to all federal, state, and local requirements related to wastewater treatment during construction and operations, including the Sewer System Management Plan, City GP Objective PFS- 9.1 Policy P2, CMC Title 13 , and required construction permits. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not increase demand for wastewater treatment beyond what has been planned and is anticipated by the City’s service providers, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because the up to 184 additional units would not exceed the combined wastewater treatment capacity of 71.7 million gallons per day provided by the three wastewater treatment plants serving the City. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater impact related to demand for wastewater treatment, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 264
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Solid Waste Generation
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that construction activities would be subject to compliance with the 50 percent diversion of solid waste requirement pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Additionally, construction activities would be required to comply with the most recent Green Building Code, which implements design and construction measures that act to reduce construction -related waste through material conservation measures and other construction-related efficiency measures. The 2022 IS/ND determined that previously unplanned proposed candidate sites are located in already urbanized areas of the City in either existing residential or non-residential land use designations and zoning. Additionally, it is not expected that development of unplanned housing unit s would lead to inadequate landfill capacity at the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill, which has a daily capacity of 16,054 tons per day, a remaining capacity for 383.4 million cubic yards, and a projected operational life through 2047. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. The project would allow for increased development intensity at certain sites, up to a total of 184 additional units compared to what was evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. However, the additional development potential would not change the significance conclusions of the 2022 IS/ND because the up t o 184 additional units would not exceed the existing capacity of El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill, which has a daily capacity of 16,054 tons per day, a remaining capacity for 383.4 million cubic yards, and a projected operational life through 2047. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater generation of solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
Solid Waste Regulations
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would comply with applicable solid waste regulations, including the California Integrated Waste Ma nagement Act of 1989 (AB 939), Section 4.408 of the CALGreen Code, and SB 341, which requires multi -family residential development and commercial uses to implement recycling programs . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development wou ld c omply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 265
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory , and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Future housing development would comply with applicable solid waste regulations, including the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) ; Section 4.408 of the CALGreen Code; and SB 341, which requires multi -family residential development and commercial uses to implement recycling programs. Therefore, the project would not result in a new or substantially greater conflict with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and impacts would be less than significant. No new impact would occur.
15.20 Wildfire
Emergency Response Plans
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing de velopment would not be located in areas identified on the CalFire Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map as a State Responsibility Area or a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Additionally, conditions of approval for new development include a number of actions to reduce fire danger to new structures and the community in general would apply as documented in the City GP EIR. Furthermore, the potential to impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis, and conditions of approval and/or mitigation would be placed on proposed projects to address any potential impacts, consistent with City GP policies. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not substantially impai r an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be evaluated for the potential to impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis and conditions of approval and/or mitigation would be placed on proposed projects to address any potential impacts, consistent with City GP policies, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan than previously analyzed, and impacts would be less than significant.
Wildfire
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would be required to adhere to all applicable fire prevention requirements and regulations, including California Fire Code requirements.
Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not expose project
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 266
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. All future housing development would be required to adhere to all applicable fire prevention requirements and regulations, including C alifornia Fire Code requirements, as documented in the 2022 IS/ND.
Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, and impacts would be less than significant.
Infrastructure
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the need for installation and maintenance of new infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water resources, power lines, or other utilities) would be evaluated as part of the development review process. The 2022 IS/ND anticipated that future housing development would be served by the extension of existing utility infrastructure located primarily in existing rights -of-way consistent with applicable development regulations . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. It is anticipated that future housing development would be served by the extension of existing utility infrastructure located primarily in existing rights -of-way consistent with applicable development regulations. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially g reater impacts related to infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment, and impacts would be less than significant.
Flooding and Landslides
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND determined that the City does not co ntain any areas identified as having a severe potential for landslides, and the candidate housing sites would be located within urbanized areas that are r elatively flat. The 2022 IS/ND determined that a dherence to s tate and City codes, and emergency and evacuation plans set by the City and the County would prevent impacts to people or structures from risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or land slides, as a result of
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 267
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined future housing development would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. Adherence to state and City codes and emergency and evacuation plans set by the City and the County would prevent impacts to people or structures from risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes, and impacts would be less than significant.
15.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Biological and Historical Resources
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND did not identify any impacts to the types of resources listed under this threshold .
Future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process and required to adhere to all f ederal, state, and local requirements . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would no t develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. This addendum did not identify any new significant impacts in Sections 15.4 Biological Resources or 15.5 Cultural Resources above that had not previously been identified in the 2 022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal , or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory , and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 268
Addendum to the 2022 IS/ND for the Housing Element Update Zoning, General Plan, and Specific Plan Amendments for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Implementation Project
Cumulative Impacts
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND did not identify any significant impacts in Sections 15.1 through 15.20 above. Future housing development would be subject to the City’s development review process and required to adhere to all federal, state, and local requirements . Future housing development would occur as market conditions allow, at the discretion of the individual property owners , and would be subject to the City’s development review process and environmental review under CEQA . Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not h ave impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. This addendum did not identify any significant impacts in Sections 15.1 through 15.20 above that had not previously been identified in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and impacts would be less than significant.
Human Beings
2022 IS/ND
The 2022 IS/ND did not identify any substantial adverse effects on human beings in Sections 15.1 through 15.20 above . The candidate housing sites are dispersed throughout the community to minimize the potential for adverse environmental impacts. The provision of additional housing in the City is intended to create adequate housing availability at all income levels. The creation of more economically and socially diversified housing choices is a goal of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update and is intended to provide new housing opportunities for low-income households. Therefore, the 2022 IS/ND determined that future housing development would not have substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant.
Project
The project would not make any changes to the candidate housing site inventory, and therefore would not develop housing in any locations that were not evaluated in the 2022 IS/ND. This addendum did not identify any new significant impacts in Sections 15.1 through 15.20 above that had not previously been identified in the 2022 IS/ND. Therefore, the project would not result in new or substantially greater adverse effects on human beings, and impacts would be less than significant.
11.13.d
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 269
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHINO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CITY’S GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE MAP TO IDENTIFY THE
LOCATION OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED USE
OVERLAY DISTRICT SITES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
INCLUDES TEXT CHA NGES TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
ELEMENT UPDATING LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS AS OUTLINED IN
THE 2021 -2029 HOUSING ELEMENT, AND AS APPROVED WITH
MEASURE Y BY THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF CHINO ON JUNE 7, 2022. PL22-0076 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Measure M, passed by the voters of the City of Chino on November 8, 1988, the City has established maximum residential densities for lands in Chino; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Measure M, voter authorization is required to increase the maximum density of any land designated for a residential use within the city established by the zoning map and the zoning ordinance of the city, or any development agreements in effect on November 8, 1988, excepting senior housing projects; and voter authorization is required to permit development of residential uses on any land designated for a nonresidential use within the city, excepting school sites designated in the general plan or a specific plan, or development agreements approved by the city prior to November 8, 1988; and
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2010 -26, adopting the Chino Envision 2025 General Plan (General Plan); and WHEREAS, the City of Chino Municipal Code establishes procedures on how to amend the General Plan as described in Section 20.23.040; and WHEREAS, the City received a mandate from the State of California and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Housing Element of the General Plan in order to set forth the City’s strategy to preserve and enhance the community’s residential character, expand housing opportunities for all economic sectors consistent with Chino's share of the Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA), and provide guidance and direction for local government officials in all matters related to housing for the 2021-2029 planning period; and WHEREAS, amendments to land use designations that permit residential uses on lands that were designated for a nonresidential use within the city on November 8, 1988 are required to satisfy State mandates for the 2021 -2029 Housing Element and avoid penalties under State law; and
11.13.e
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 270
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014
WHEREAS, in order to satisfy State requirements, the City prepared a Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element that proposed the establishment of two residential overlays (an affordable housing overlay and a mixed use overlay) that would permit high density residential uses on lands that have a residential designation where the maximum residential density will be increased and on lands designated for nonresidential use and identified the specific sites listed in Exhibit A to receive the overlay designations; and WHEREAS, the City duly adopted the 2021-2029 Housing Element on January 4, 2022; and
WHEREAS, in June 2022, Chino voters passed Measure Y, authorizing the addition of Section 20.15.170, entitled "Voter Authorization to Redesignate Specified Land," to the Chino Municipal Code, which will permit the use of the overlay designations as described in the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, and WHEREAS, Figure LU-2, Table LU -1, and Section D. Land Use Designations of the Land Use Element of General Plan do not reflect the establishment of the two residential overlays; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Element of General Plan includes a Focused Growth Plan, shown in Figure LU -3, which does not reflect that certain parcels have received voter authorization for redesignation pursuant to Measure Y; and WHEREAS, State law requires that General Plan Elements be internally consistent with each other and the amendments to the Land Use Element shown in Exhibit B is required to ensure internal consistency; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2023 and March 20, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for PL22 -0076 (General Plan Amendment) in compliance with law, entertained the written and oral report of staff, and took public testimony on the Project and by a vote of 6-0 with one abstention recommended to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment PL22-0076; and
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing for PL22-0076 (General Plan Amendment) in compliance with law, considered the Planning Commission’s recommendation, entertained the written and oral report of staff, and entertained written and public testimony on the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chino, California, does hereby FIND, DETERMINE, and RESOLVE as follows:
A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
B. Based on substantial evidence, both written and oral, from the public hearing, the City Council makes the following findings and takes the following actions on PL22-0076 (General Plan Amendment):
11.13.e
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 271
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014
1. PL22-0076 (General Plan Amendment)
a. The proposed General Plan amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan, including objectives, goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan in that the amendments implement General Plan Housing Element Programs 3B, 3C, and 2G, which require the City to adopt regulations for an affordable housing overlay, a mixed use overlay, and Farmworker H ousing, and is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Objective LU -1.1, which establishes direction for the City to provide a variety of housing types that meet the housing needs of residents of all income levels in Chino; and
b. The proposed General P lan amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, as it will allow the City to facilitate the development of housing affordable to all segments of the community, and impacts associated with f uture projects developed pursuant to the amended General Plan will be mitigated; and c. The proposed General Plan amendment will maintain an appropriate balance of land uses within the City because the amendment is consistent with Measure M and because the overlays would promote residential development in areas of Chino with good access to transportation, retail shopping, and public services; and
d. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendm ent is appropriate in that the sites receiving the overlay designations to facilitate affordable housing development are located in areas of Chino with good access to transportation, retail shopping, and public services and meet the suitability criteria fo r affordable housing sites established in State law.
Consequently, the subject sites are physically suitable, including, but not limited to, parcel size, shape, access, availability of utilities and compatibility with adjoining land uses, for the requested land use designation and anticipated development.
2. CEQA Findings. The City has prepared and adopted an Addendum to the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update (2021-2029) Project Negative Declaration that includes an explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, supported by substantial evidence that there is no potential for a significant effect on the environment attributable to PL22 -076 (General Plan Amendment). The Addendum satisfies the requirements of the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (California Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.; 14 CCR 15000 et seq.).
3. Approval of PL22-0076 (General Plan Amendment). The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and hereby approves PL2 2-0076 (General Plan Amendment), amending the Land Use Element as outlined in the attached Exhibit “B”.
11.13.e
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 272
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014
4. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective on the effective date of Ordinance No. 2023-008.
11.13.e
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 273
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-014
5. Actions by the City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to attest as to the adoption of this Resolution as of the date set forth below.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2023.
EUNICE M. ULLOA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
NATALIE GONZAGA, CITY CLERK
State of California )
County of San Bernardino ) §
City of Chino )
I, Natalie Gonzaga , City Clerk of the City of Chino, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Chino City Council at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of April 2023, by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NATALIE GONZAGA, CITY CLERK
Attachments:
Exhibit “A” – Map and List of Sites Receiving the AHO and MUO Designations Exhibit “B” – Amendments to the General Plan 2025 Land Use Element
11.13.e
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 274
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 275
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
101403103 11488 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 4.54
101465201 11700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.24
101439302 11700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.44
101403132 11436 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.70
101551127 6210 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 8.19
101551103 6132 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 2.31
102103122 13700 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.00
102103116 5319 SCHAEFER AVE AFF-OV 1.45
102103126 13779 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.97
102011101 6033 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 3.83
102010146 5993 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.19
101557211 5559 PARK PL AFF-OV 2.38
101437138 11740 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.09
101437137 11712 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.74
101438102 11769 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.38
101438103 11761 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.38
101438101 11791 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 1.80
101551129 6180 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.10
101551128 6160 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 1.12
102004425 13001 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.58
102519106 4500 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 5.38
102548201 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 0.47
102515108 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 2.43
102549101 4700 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY AFF-OV 0.37
101465101 11817 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 0.80
102103117 5345 SCHAEFER AVE AFF-OV 0.77
105205121 13078 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.34
105205122 12900 BLOCK EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.34
105205123 13102 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 0.69
105205124 13134 EUCLID AVE AFF-OV 3.15
105325102 6622 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 4.76
105325103 6566 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 4.68
105325104 6522 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 3.36
105327109 6950 EDISON AVE AFF-OV 12.77
101403101 11436 CENTRAL AVE AFF-OV 2.29
102521129 4300 BLOCK CORPORATE CENTER DR AFF-OV 4.14
101945117 13375 RAMONA AVE AFF-OV 4.62
101951105 13555 RAMONA AVE AFF-OV 4.39
102029427 5088 CHINO AVE AFF-OV 0.45
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 276
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
102029410 13100 BLOCK 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.16
102029411 13100 BLOCK 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.16
102029412 13286 5TH ST AFF-OV 0.14
101562221 5130 RIVERSIDE DR AFF-OV 8.98
102606105 14700 BLOCK EUCLID AVE AFF-OV Partial 113.29
101462151 11900 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.21
101507108 5501 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 4.65
101910105 4117 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 4.93
101529202 12404 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 3.45
101529206 12454 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.56
101537102 12516 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 3.01
101537103 12526 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.41
101537105 12550 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.93
101555301 5832 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 2.88
102045112 13300 BLOCK CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.41
101462150 11980 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.08
102520106 14700 BLOCK RAMONA AVE MU-OV 4.08
102519107 4500 BLOCK CHINO HILLS PKWY MU-OV 8.41
101506107 5459 PHILADELPHIA AVE MU-OV 6.20
101506108 5463 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 7.52
102033111 5300 BLOCK G ST MU-OV 0.39
102033112 13399 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 0.78
102033113 13339 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.38
102033114 13309 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.76
102033116 5300 BLOCK CHINO AVE MU-OV 0.52
105205106 7041 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.68
105205107 7049 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.66
105205108 6900 BLOCK RIVERSIDE AVE MU-OV 0.33
105205109 7063 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.49
105205110 7075 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.11
105205112 12956 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.49
105205113 12962 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.64
105205114 12976 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.62
105205115 12986 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.98
105205116 13012 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 1.23
105205117 13024 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.82
105205118 13046 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.34
105205120 12900 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.96
105205125 13062 EUCLID AVE MU-OV 0.34
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 277
APN Address OVERLAY ACRES
105258103 13500 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 10.36
105258104 13500 BLOCK EUCLID AVE MU-OV 3.20
102513206 14659 RAMONA AVE MU-OV 8.67
102257109 4093 GRAND AVE MU-OV 8.07
101530116 12356 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 2.00
101460119 5402 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 6.09
101460120 5440 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 3.10
101459116 5536 PHILADELPHIA ST MU-OV 3.40
101557827 5650 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.47
101557828 5664 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.43
101557829 5684 RIVERSIDE DR MU-OV 0.24
101504107 12266 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 1.79
101504106 12206 CENTRAL AVE MU-OV 0.60
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 278
Exhibit B – General Plan 2025 Land Use Element Amendment
THE CHINO GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOL- LOWS. ADDITIONS ARE SHOWN IN REDLINE FORMAT; DELETIONS ARE IN
STRIKETHROUGH FORMAT AND EXISTING TEXT THAT IS NOT SHOWN AND WILL NOT BE AMENDED IS DENOTED BY ELLIPSIS (“…”).
Page LU-7
TABLE LU-1: LAND USE DESIGNATION ACREAGES
Land Use Acres in City Limit Acres in SOI Total Acres
Residential
RD 1 (1du/ac) 153 17 170
RD 2 (2du/ac) 517 999 1,516
RD 4.5 (4.5 du/ac) 2,174 207 2,381
Low Density Residential 452 - 452
RD 8 (8 du/ac) 187 13 200
Medium Density Residential 708 - 708
RD 12 (12 du/ac) 126 2 127
RD 14 (14 du/ac) 35 - 35
High Density Residential 139 - 139
RD 20 (20 du/ac) 178 11 189
RD 30 (30 du/ac) 31 - 31
Open Space
Agriculture 900 - 900
Recreation / Open Space 3,455 - 3,455
Urban Reserve 1,779 - 1,7779
Commercial
Office Commercial 101 2 103
Neighborhood Commercial 32 17 49
General Commercial 396 15 411
Regional Commercial 320 - 320
Industrial
Business Park 111 - 111
Service Commercial 53 - 53
Manufacturing Research - - -
General Industrial 2,055 5 2,060
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 279
Exhibit B – General Plan 2025 Land Use Element Amendment 2 Light Industrial 795 63 858
Other
Public 1,306 4 1,310
Public Schools 332 10 341
Mixed-Use Medium Density (20
du/ac)
- 31 31
Mixed-Use – High Density (30
du/ac)
28 - 28
Mixed Use – College Park 43 - 43
Community Core (16 du/ac) 104 - 104
Airport Related 170 - 170
Overlays
Affordable Housing Overlay 114* - 114*
Mixed Use Overlay 119* - 119*
Total 16,680 1,395 18,075
*Overlay acreage not added to total
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 280
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 281
Exhibit B – General Plan 2025 Land Use Element Amendment 4 Pg. LU-19
r. Public Facilities
The Public Facilities designation accommodates local and regional-serving public and quasi-public facilities and services, such as schools, libraries, places of wor- ship, police and fire stations, and utility stations.
9. Overlay Designations
a. Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO)
This designation is intended to promote the development of affordable housing for low, very low, and moderate income households in specific areas identified in Fig- ure LU-2 where high density residential uses would not otherwise be allowed. The AHO is intended for standalone housing projects at densities of up to 30 dwelling units per acre, but only if the development satisfies the affordable housing require- ments in Section 20.09.090 of the Chino Municipal Code. b. Mixed Use Overlay (MUO)
This designation is intended to promote the development of affordable housing for low, very low, and moderate income households in specific areas identified in Fig- ure LU-2 where high density residential uses would not otherwise be allowed. The MUO provides for mixed use development with housing either on upper floors or in separate buildings at densities of up to 30 dwelling units per acre, but only if the development satisfies the affordable housing requirements in Section 20.09.090 of the Chino Municipal Code.
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 282
Exhibit B – General Plan 2025 Land Use Element Amendment 5 Pg. 22 The following map shall replace the existing Figure LU-3:
FIGURE LU-3
FOCUSED GROWTH PLAN
11.13.f
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 283
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHINO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 20 (ZONING) OF THE CHINO
MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED USE
OVERLAY DISTRICTS: CHAPTER 20.03 (ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING MAPS), CHAPTER 20.08 (AGRICULTURAL, OPEN SPACE
AND PUBLIC ZONING DISTRICTS), CHAPTER 20.09 (OVERLAY
DISTRICTS), CHAPTER 20.18 (PARKING), CHAPTER 20.21
(STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES), CHAPTER 20.23
(ADMINISTRATION), AND CHAPTER 20.24 (GLOSSARY) AND
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED USE OVERLAY DISTRICT SITES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT
The City Council of the City of Chino, California, does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1 . Chapter 20.03 (Zoning Districts and Zoning Maps) is hereby amended as follows (additions in Red):
CHAPTER 20.03 ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP
…
20.03.020 – Zoning Districts and Zoning Map
A. Base Zoning Districts. The City of Chino shall be divided into zoning districts that implement the City of Chino General Plan.
…
B. Overlay Zoning Districts. The City of Chino establishes the overlay zoning districts set out in Table 20.03-2. These impose additional requirements on certain properties within one or more underlying base zoning districts.
TABLE 20.03-2 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Overlay Zoning District Symbol Name of Zoning District
AHO Affordable Housing Overlay District
AO Agricultural Overlay District
A Airport Overlay District
DO Downtown Overlay
MUO Mixed Use Overlay District
Section 2. Chapter 20.08 (Agricultural, Open Space, and Public Zoning Districts) is hereby amended as follows (additions in Red):
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 284
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
CHAPTER 20.08 - AGRICULTURAL, OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC ZONING
DISTRICTS
20.08.030 - Use regulations.
A. Permitted uses. Table 20.08-1 identifies land uses in the agricultural, open space and public zoning districts.
TABLE 20.08-1 LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL, OPEN SPACE,
AND PUBLIC ZONING DISTRICTS
Uses
Zoning District
Additional Regulations
AG OS 1 OS 2 P PS
Residential Uses
Single-Family Dwellings P ■ ■ ■ ■
Accessory Dwelling Units P ■ ■ ■ ■ Section 20.11.020 Junior Accessory Dwelling
Units P ■ ■ ■ ■ Section 20.11.020
Caretaker Quarters P ■ ■ ■ ■ Section 20.21.110
Farm Employee Housing,
Large C C C ■ ■ Section 20.21.490
Farm Employee Housing,
Small P P P ■ ■ Section 20.21.490
…
Section 3. Chapter 20.09 (Overlay Districts) is hereby amended as follows ( additions in Red):
CHAPTER 20.09 OVERLAY DISTRICTS
…
20.09.090 Overlay districts for affordable housing
A. Purpose and intent. The purpose of the overlay districts for affordable housing – the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) district and the Mixed Use Overlay (MUO) district – is to promote the development of affordable housing for low and very low income
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 285
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
households in specific areas identified in the General Plan at densities of up to 30 dwelling units per acre if affordability requirements established in this section are met. More specifically, the AHO and MUO allow residential uses where they wou ld not otherwise be allowed and provi de for additional density in return for projects providing more affordable housing. The AHO is intended for standalone affordable housing projects, while the MUO provides for mixed use development with affordable housing either on upper floors or in separate buildings. This section also provides the residential development community t wo alternatives for construction of affordable housing within market-rate development and offers a streamlined process for administrative review of qualifying projects with affordable housing using checklists and objective standards as required by State law.
B. Relation to base zoning. The AHO and MUO district regulations shall apply in the case of a conflict with the base zoning district regulations when a housing project is proposed. However, when an applicant proposes only non-residential uses, then only the base zoning district land use regulations and development standards apply. The AHO and MUO regulations and development standards only apply to proposed housing projects.
C. Permitted uses. Table 20.09-4 identifies residential land uses permitted in the AHO and MUO districts in addition to the uses that are permitted within the existing base zoning district.
TABLE 20.09-4: ADDITIONAL LAND USES PERMITTED
IN AHO AND MUO DISTRICTS
Uses District Additional Regulations AHO and MUO
Residential Uses
Accessory
Dwelling Units P Section 20.11.020
Multiple-Family
Dwellings P
Senior Housing
Projects P
Section 20.21.340 with
additional density
allowed for affordable
housing under criteria
established in this
section
Warehousing and Storage
Public Storage C – MUO only Sections 20.21.210 and
20.09.090(E)(4)
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 286
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
D. Required density and increased density for affordable housing.
1. Minimum and maximum density.
a. Rental projects. The maximum density for residential development with rental units in the AHO and MUO districts shall be 26 units per adjusted gross acre unless a project qualifies for additional density by providing more affordable housing pursuant to subsection (2) below or qualifies for additional density under state law under subsection (3) below , or both .
The minimum density shall be 26 units per adjusted gross acre. b. For sale projects. The maximum density for residential development with for-sale units in the AHO and MUO districts shall be 30 units per adjusted gross acre provided that at least 3 percent of the units are available for purchase by moderate income households at an affordable purchase price. The minimum density shall be 26 units per adjusted gross acre.
2. Additional density for affordable rental housing. An increase in the maximum density is allowed, as shown in Table 20.09 -5, for qualifying residential development with rental units if the percentage of low income units meets or exceeds the percentages shown, provided that the maximum density shall not exceed 30 units per adjusted gross acre.
TABLE 20.09-5: ADDITIONAL DENSITY FOR QUALIFYING AFFORDABLE
RENTAL HOUSING PROJECTS IN AHO AND MUO DISTRICTS
Maximum Allowable Density (Units per Adjusted Gross Acre) 26 27 28 29 30
Percent Affordable Units Required in Rental Projects:
Low Income Units 9 10 11 12 13
3. Additional density under state law. Applicants also may be eligible for a density bonus, incentives, and/or concessions under the State Density Bonus Law, the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, and other applicable State laws.
E. Additional land use regulations for MUO district.
1. Types of mixed use allowed. Both horizontal and vertical mixed use development shall be allowed in the MUO district.
a. Horizontal mixed use development allows a range of uses adjacent to one another, either in separate buildings or parcels. Individual buildings
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 287
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
may share project components, such as parking, serving, loading, and utility areas.
b. Vertical mixed use allows for a mix of uses within a single building where non-residential uses occupy the ground floor and residential uses are on the upper levels. A vertical mixed use project may have surface parking, subterranean parking decks, and/or at grade and above grade par king decks.
2. Minimum amount of retail and service uses required in a mixed-use project. In a mixed use project, at least 10 percent of the gross floor area shall be reserved for and occupied by retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, retail banks, financial and business services, or businesses offering personal services. If the project is within or adjacent to a shopping center or regional retail complex, this requirement for on -site retail uses shall be reduced to 5 percent.
3. Active and pedestrian-oriented frontages required. Along the primary building frontage, active ground floor uses are required in mixed use building s with residential uses above commercial uses for at least 60 percent of street-facing spacing. These may include retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, retail banks, financial and business services, personal services, and offices for walk-in clientele, such as employment agencies, insurance offices, real estate offices, travel agencies, and offices for elected of ficials. For residential only buildings along a primary building frontage, an active frontage with a pedestrian orientation can include windows and glass doors, stoops and steps, covered entries, and windows providing views into active space within the building, such as lobbies and gyms. The Director of Development Services also may allow these active and pedestrian-oriented frontages to be provided along private streets, interior walkways, and around plazas and courtyards
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 288
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
within the interior of a mixed use project rather than on exterior frontages facing arterial streets.
4. Public Storage Facilities. In addition to the requirements of Section 20.21.210, public storage shall comply with the following standards:
a. Minimum site size. Public storage facilities are only allowed within mixed use development on sites with of five acres or more.
b. Setbacks. Public storage facilities shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet from front and street side property lines.
c. Maximum building height. If freestanding, the maximum buil ding height for a public storage facility shall not exceed the building height of an adjacent residential only or mixed us building.
d. Maximum floor area. The maximum floor area for public storage facilities on a site shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area for all residential and non-residential uses.
e. Exterior building materials. The exterior building materials, colors, and finishes of the public storage facility shall be the same as those used for residential and mixed use buildings on the project site to create a unified appearance
f. Building articulation. The building facades of public storage facilities that face streets or residential and mixed use buildings in a project shall include building projections or recesses, doorways or window trim, a nd other details that provide architectural articulation and visual interest. g. On-site management. On-site, 24-hour management shall be provided, and the Planning Commission may establish specific hours of operation as a condition of approval of a conditional use permit for a public storage facility.
F. Development standards for the AHO district . All residential development in the AHO district shall comply with the development standards in Table 20.09 -6 and the supplemental design standards following the table; and with the Multiple -Family Residential Design Standards in Section 20.17.050 to the e xtent these are not superseded by the supplemental design standards following the table . If no housing is proposed, then non-residential development must comply only with the standards
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 289
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
of the base zoning district with which the AHO district is combined and the Commercial Design Standards in Section 20.17.070.
TABLE 20.09-6: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN THE AHO DISTRICT
Feature Standard Additional Regulations
Site Requirements
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft.
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 65%
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (non-
residential space) 0.85 Note 1
Minimum Landscape Coverage 15% See Chapter 20.19
Refuse Storage and Recycling See Chapter 20.10.060
Building Form and Location
Maximum Building Height 40 feet Note 2
Minimum Setbacks:
Front 15 feet Notes 3, 4, and 5
Rear 10 feet; 15 feet if
adjacent to a
Residential or
Industrial district See also Subsection
(F)(1). Interior Side 5 feet; 10 feet if
adjacent to a
Residential district
Street Side 10 feet Chapter 20.18 and Notes
3, 4, and 5
Minimum Building Separations 15 feet
Other Requirements
Off-street parking and loading for
non-residential uses
See Chapter 20.18 (Parking)
Street curb cuts Note 6
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 290
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
TABLE 20.09-6: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN THE AHO DISTRICT
Feature Standard Additional Regulations
Notes:
[1] Additional FAR is allowed up to 1.25 for projects with affordable rental units . The amount of additional FAR shall be calculated based on the increase in density allowed for qualifying projects meeting affordable housing criteria. For example, i f a project receives a one unit per acre increase in density, then it receives a 0.125 increase in allowable FAR.
[2] Additional height is allowed up to 45 feet for lots with at least 100 feet of primary street frontage to enable provision of sloped roofs and common open space for recreational facilities. The upper story above 40 feet shall be setback back an additional seven feet from the interior property line if the project is adjacent to a Residential zoning district. [3] The front setback may be reduced to 10 feet on the following streets: Riverside Drive and Central Avenue.
[4] A minimum 20-foot setback must be provided for garages and carports facing a street. [5] Open or covered porches may be constructed in the front and street side setbacks to encroach no closer than 12 feet to the front property line and 5 feet to the street sid e property line.
[6] New street curb cuts are not allowed on lots with alley access unless approved by the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer to accommodate affordable housing units.
1. Required side and rear yards for residential uses. In order to provide light and air for residential units and additional separation for rooms that contain areas that require additional privacy considerations, the following minimum setbacks shall apply to any building wall containing windows and facing an interior side or rear yard. The required setbacks apply to that portion of the building wall containing and extending 3 feet on either side of any window. a. For any wall containing living room or other primary room windows, a setback of at least 15 feet shall be provided.
b. For any wall containing sleeping room windows, a setback of at least 10 feet shall be provided.
c. For all other walls containing windows, a setback of at least 5 feet shall be provided.
2. Required building wall on designated s treets. Along Riverside Drive and Central Avenue south of Highway 60, building walls shall be constructed along or within 10 feet of the front property line for a minimum of 70 percent of the primary street frontage and 40 percent on secondary street frontages. This
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 291
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
requirement may be waived by the Director of Development Services upon finding that:
a. Ground-floor residential uses are proposed, a minimum 15 -foot setback is proposed, and substantial landscaping will be located between the build-to and ground-floor residential units as a buffer; b. Entry courtyards, plazas, entries, or outdoor eating areas are located between the build-to line and the building and buildings are constructed at the edge of the courtyard, plaza, or dining area;
c. The building incorporates an alternative entrance design that creates a welcoming entry facing the street.
3. Building entrances.
a. Principal building entries shall front upon the primary street or be in a visually-prominent location as determined by the Director of Development Services.
b. Building entries shall be accented with features such as moldings, lighting, overhangs, or awnings.
4. Building mass and scale.
a. To reduce upper -story building mass, floorplates for the third story and above shall not exceed 80 percent of the ground -floor floorplate. The Director of Development Services may waive this requirement upon finding the architectural articulation of exterior walls and a sloped roof modulates the visual mass of the top of the building and avoids the appearance of a box-like structure.
b. Buildings that are more than 150 feet in length shall include a minimum 2-foot vertical variation in height for at least 50 feet.
5. Pedestrian orientation and accessible pedestrian facilities on designated streets.
a. Along Riverside Drive and Central Avenue south of Highway 60, all development on sites over two acres in size shall incorporate such features as plazas, interior walkways, canopies, arcades, paseos, ornamental gates, trellises, lighting, plant materials, seating, fountains,
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 292
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
or other similar features, as appropriate, to support and enhance pedestrian spaces.
b. Outdoor pedestrian space shall be l andscaped and shall include appropriate street furniture to encourage pedestrian activity. c. Clearly marked pedestrian connections shall be provided between parking areas and buildings.
d. All sidewalks, crosswalks, courts, plazas and residential buildings shall be designed to be safe, accessible, and convenient for individuals of all abilities, whether travelling by foot, wheelchair, or other mobility aid, consistent with the City’s adopted Policy on Accessible Pedestrian Facilities.
6. Parking.
a. Parking areas are prohibited between the building and primary street edge. On -site parking shall be in the rear half of the site or within a parking structure.
b. Multi-story parking structures within 25 feet of a street frontage shall be lined with foundation landscaping at the ground floor.
c. Building siting and parking design shall maximize opportunities for shared parking, access entries, and driveways in order to minimize the number of curb cuts and thus limit possible conflict between pedestrians and automobiles.
d. Whenever possible, vehicle access sh all be provided from side streets and alleys to limit the number of driveways along arterial streets.
7. Landscaping.
a. Street trees shall be included along all street frontages with multi -family housing development. T rees shall be selected from a list of City- approved trees and shall be approved by the Director of Development Services prior to installation.
b. Where pedestrian paths or walkways cross parking areas or driveways, the paths shall incorporate landscaping and decorative paving to define the pedestrian space.
G. Development standards for the MUO district . All residential -only buildings and mixed use development with residential units in the MUO district shall comply with the development standards in Table 20.09-7 and the supplemental design standards following the table , and with the Multiple -Family Residential Design Standards in Section 20.17.050 and the Mixed Use Design Standards in Section 20.17.060 to the
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 293
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
extent these are not superseded by the supplemental design standards following the table. Non -residential development shall comply with the standards of the base zoning district with which the MUO district is combined and the Commercial Design Standards in Section 20.17.070.
TABLE 20.09-7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN MUO DISTRICT
Feature Standard Additional Regulations
Site Requirements
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft.
Minimum Lot Width 100 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 80%
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
(non-residential space)
1.0 Note 1
Minimum Landscape
Coverage
15% See Chapter 20.19
Refuse Storage and
Recycling
See Chapter
20.10.060
Building Form and Location
Maximum Building Height 50 feet Note 2
Minimum Setbacks (ft.):
Front 10 feet; 15 feet
if ground floor is
residential
Notes 3 and 5
Rear 10 feet; 15 feet
adjacent to a
Residential
District
See also Subsection
(G)(1).
Interior Side 0 feet; 10 feet
adjacent to a
Residential
district
Street Side 10 feet Notes 3, 4, and 5
Minimum Building
Separations
15 feet
Other Requirements
Off-street parking and loading
for non-residential uses
See Chapter 20.18
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 294
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008
TABLE 20.09-7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN MUO DISTRICT
Feature Standard Additional Regulations
Street curb cuts Note 6
Notes:
[1] Additional FAR is allowed up to 1.25 in mixed use development with affordable rental units. The amount of additional FAR shall be calculated based on the increase in density allowed for qualifying projects meeting affordable housing criteria. For example, if a project receives a one unit per acre increase in density, then it receives a 0.0625 increase in allowable FAR. [2] Additional height is allowed up to 55 feet for lots with 100 feet of street frontage to enable provision of sloped roofs and common open space for recreational facilities. The upper story above 40 feet shall be setback back an additional seven feet from the interior property line if the project is adjacent to a Residential zoning district.
[3] A minimum 15 feet of front and street side setback shall be provided along primary and secondary arterial streets. A reduced front setback may be allowed on the following streets: Riverside, Central, and Euclid. [4] A minimum 20-foot setback must be provided for garages and carports facing a street.
[5] Open or covered porches may be constructed in the front and street side setbacks to encroach no closer
than 12 feet to the front property line and 5 feet to the street side property line.
[6] New street curb cuts are not allowed on lots with alley access unless approved by the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer to accommodate for affordable housing units.
1. Required side and rear yards for residential uses. In order to provide light and air for residential units and additional separation for rooms that contain areas that require additional privacy considerations, the following minimum setbacks shall apply to any building wall containing windows and facing an interior side
11.13.g
Mixed Use and Affordable Housing Overlay District
Packet Pg. 295
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-008