Chino City Council
April 4, 2023

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 586
CHINO LRSP 2023

21 Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Monte Vista Ave. & C St 9 0.55 43 0 0 3 1 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 0 Oaks Ave. & Chino Ave. 8 0.26 23 0 0 1 1 6 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 587
CHINO LRSP 2023

22 Table 3: Analysis Rankings – Segments (Top 10 Locations Per Type)

Facility Limits
Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Major
Central Ave. EB 60 On Ramp - WB 60 On
Ramp 65 5.10 214 0 0 7 16 42 30 10 16 3 3 1 0 2 3 17 0 3 18 2 Euclid Ave. (SR-83) Pine Ave. - NB 71 Ramp 48 -0.12 341 1 0 7 12 28 3 6 24 2 9 2 1 0 0 24 0 3 18 3 Pine Ave. Euclid Ave. (SR-83) -
Meadowhouse Ave. 37 1.25 286 0 1 2 13 21 0 2 34 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 0 4 0 Central Ave. WB 60 On Ramp - Philadelphia
St 34 1.56 297 1 0 5 10 18 18 7 7 1 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 1 8 2 Mountain Ave. WB 60 On Ramp - EB 60 On
Ramp 23 2.73 68 0 0 1 7 15 5 3 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 2 9 0 Euclid Ave. (Sr-83) Merrill Ave - Kimball Ave 17 -0.35 216 1 0 1 5 10 3 4 7 1 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 9 3 Central Ave. Carson St - Country Fair 15 0.18 74 0 0 4 4 7 5 2 4 1 1 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 2 2 Mountain Ave. Eb 60 On - Walnut Ave. 15 1.43 51 0 0 0 7 8 7 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 4 3 Riverside Dr. Monte Vista Ave. - Central Ave 13 7.67 211 0 1 2 3 7 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 2 Pine Ave. Meadowhouse Ave. - Rincon
Meadows Ave. 12 -0.12 37 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 7 1 2 1 0 0 0 9 1 1 4 1 Primary
Ramona Ave. Walnut Ave. - Riverside Dr. 16 1.35 214 0 1 2 3 10 3 4 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 9 0 Chino Hills Pkwy. Ramona Ave. - Monte Vista
Ave. 13 -0.03 13 0 0 0 0 13 1 3 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 Ramona Ave. Walnut Ave. - Roosevelt St 12 1.35 47 0 0 1 5 6 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 3 0 Ramona Ave. Roosevelt St - Wilson St 11 1.04 36 0 0 1 3 7 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 0 Ramona Ave. Schaefer Ave. - Edison Ave. 9 0.11 198 0 1 1 3 4 1 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6 4

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 588
CHINO LRSP 2023

23 Facility Limits
Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Kimball Ave. Euclid Ave. (SR-83) - Mayhew
Ave 9 -0.01 520 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 1 4 2
Ramona Ave. Philadelphia St. - Eb 60 On 7 0.26 22 0 0 1 1 5 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 Schaefer Ave. Monte Vista Ave. - Central Ave. 6 -0.07 26 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 Kimball Ave. Main St - Flight Ave 6 0.12 30 0 0 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 Kimball Ave. Flight Ave - Meadow Valley Ave 6 0.14 21 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 Secondary
Kimball Ave. El Prado Rd. - Mountain Ave. 21 -0.01 75 0 0 4 3 14 0 3 15 0 1 1 1 0 0 16 0 0 5 0 Pipeline Ave. Edison Ave - Eucalyptus Ave 19 0.20 257 0 1 5 5 8 7 3 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 4 0 1 3 0 El Prado Rd. Alton St - Kimball Ave. 19 0.56 213 0 1 0 6 12 8 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 8 4 Kimball Ave. San Antonio Ave. - Euclid Ave.
(SR-83) 14 0.87 39 0 0 1 3 10 3 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 2 4 2 Philadelphia St. Bridger Ave - Central Ave 13 2.23 53 0 0 2 4 7 8 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 6 2 Pipeline Ave. Spectrum - Edison Ave 13 0.02 211 0 1 2 3 7 3 2 3 3 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 1 2 El Prado Rd. Gates St - Kimball Ave. 11 0.56 51 0 0 2 4 5 4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 2 1 Philadelphia St. Ford Dr - Ramona Ave. 9 1.34 44 0 0 2 3 4 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 1 1 Walnut Ave. Telephone Ave - Marshall Ave 9 1.47 14 0 0 0 1 8 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 Monte Vista Ave. Park St - Riverside Dr 8 1.76 52 0 0 3 3 2 1 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 Collector
Roswell Ave. Schaefer Ave - Grand Ave. 12 0.33 57 0 0 2 5 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 Ramona Ave. Riverside Dr. - Chino Ave. 9 0.27 48 0 0 3 2 4 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Yorba Ave. Walnut Ave - Davis St 6 5.24 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Eucalyptus Ave. Pipeline Ave - Appian Way 6 0.24 30 0 0 2 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Mountain Ave. Bickmore Ave. - Flowers St 6 7.19 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 1

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 589
CHINO LRSP 2023

24 Facility Limits
Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Euclid Ave. (SR-83) Pomona Rincon Rd - Nb 71 On 6 -0.52 179 1 0 1 0 4 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 Yorba Ave. Wilson St - Park St 5 3.59 20 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Yorba Ave. Murrieta St - Schaefer Ave. 5 1.27 15 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Norton Ave. Schaefer Ave. - Edison Ave 5 0.92 15 0 0 1 0 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Telephone Ave. Edison Ave - Lindsay Ct 5 2.45 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 Local
Park Pl. 13th - Benson Ave 10 7.13 45 0 0 2 3 5 2 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 Fern Ave. Kimball Ave - Bickmore Ave. 9 1.33 187 0 1 1 1 6 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 6 0 Jefferson Ave. Catalpa Pl - Benson St 6 23.64 16 0 0 1 0 5 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 G St Monte Vista Ave - 3rd St 6 14.98 16 0 0 1 0 5 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Revere St Telephone Ave - Telephone Ave 5 6.13 15 0 0 1 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 7th St Park St - Riverside Dr 5 9.93 10 0 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Park Pl. Tenth St. - 12th St 4 1.70 9 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tenth St. Riverside Dr. - B St 4 8.12 14 0 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4th St Riverside Dr - B St 4 7.46 173 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Vinita Ct Yorba Ave - End 4 4.52 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 590
CHINO LRSP 2023

25 7.8 Statewide Comparison
A comparison of fatal & severe injury collision data to the State averages were conducted for data from 2015-2018 (the most recent statewide data available). These numbers may vary slightly from those mentioned previously, due to the differences in the years of the study period.

The following are areas where Chino’s collision rates are higher or lower than those of the State. These numbers specifically compare the proportion of fatal and serious injury crashes that have the characteristics listed in Table 4.

Table 4: Comparison of Statewide and Chino Fatal & Severe Injury Crashes (2015-2018) Challenge Area Statewide % Chino % Percentage
Difference
Chino has a Higher Percentage of F&SI Crashes
Aggressive Driving 33.3% 49.0% 15.7%
Motorcyclists 21.8% 31.6% 9.8%
Young Drivers 12.3% 17.2% 4.9%
Commercial Vehicles 6.5% 10.2% 3.7%
Improper Use of Occupant
Protection 13.8% 16.1% 2.3%
Distracted Driving 4.7% 6.5% 1.8%
Aging Drivers (65+) 13.1% 14.3% 1.2%
Chino has a Lower Percentage of F&SI Crashes
Work Zones 1.4% 1.1% -0.3%
Bicyclists 7.5% 5.1% -2.4%
Pedestrians 19.3% 15.3% -4.0%
Impaired Driving 23.8% 19.4% -4.4%
Intersections 23.9% 15.3% -8.6%
Lane Departure 42.1% 32.3% -9.8%

Emphasis Areas
Emphasis Areas are behavioral, road user, or road condition characteristics that the City of Chino can strategically focus efforts on to have a large impact on transportation safety.

Emphasis areas were developed by revisiting the Vision and Goals developed at the onset of this planning process and comparing them with the trends and patterns identified in the crash analysis. Where these areas aligned, or major challenges were observed, Emphasis Areas and strategies were developed.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 591
CHINO LRSP 2023

26 Emphasis Area #1: Commercial Vehicles
Description: Collisions which involve a truck, truck tractor, school bus or other buses. The City has a significant number of collisions involving commercial vehicles that needs to be addressed.

8.6% of fatal and severe injuries in the City involved commercial vehicles, compared to 6.5% statewide.

Goal for Emphasis Area #1:
 Reduce the number of collisions involving commercial vehicles.  Identify hot spots and priority corridors to address collisions involving commercial vehicles.  Apply for funding and implement countermeasures to improve commercial vehicles collisions.

Strategies for Emphasis Area #1
 Engineering improvement may include truck route designation, and wider turning radii at intersections.
 Raise awareness of work/rest implementation to reduce driver fatigue.

Emphasis Area #2: Aggressive Driving
Description: Behaviors that involve driving too fast, tailgating, and additional reckless driving maneuvers. About 30% of total collisions in Chino involved aggressive driving. 47% of the fatal and severe injury collisions involved aggressive driving behaviors, compared to 33.3% statewide.

Goals for Emphasis Area #2:
 Reduce the number of collisions of aggressive driving.  Identify hot spots to implement improvement to address aggressive driving.  Apply for funding and implement countermeasures to help decrease aggressive driving in the City.

Strategies for Emphasis Area #2:
 Engineering improvements such as speed safety cameras, dynamic speed signage, roadway design changes and appropriate speed limits for all road users.  Educational campaigns to improve behaviors of aggressive driving such as youth traffic safety education, and community-based programs.

Emphasis Area #3: Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
Description: Collisions where a motor-vehicles is involved with either a pedestrian and/or bicyclist. About 4% of total collisions in Chino involved a pedestrian or bicyclist. 12.9% of the fatal and severe injury collisions involved pedestrians in Chino, compared to 19.3% statewide.

3.2% of the fatal and severe injury collisions involved bicyclists in Chino, compared to 7.5%.

Goal for Emphasis Area #3:
 Reduce the number of collisions involving vulnerable road users.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 592
CHINO LRSP 2023

27  Identify hot spots to implement improvements for vulnerable road users.  Apply for funding and implement countermeasures for pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Strategies for Emphasis Area #3:
 Identify priority corridors for intersections collisions and implement countermeasures on these corridors
 Engineering improvements for pedestrian safety include crosswalk visibility enhancement such as high-visibility crosswalks, lighting, leading pedestrian interval, and signing and pavement markings.
 Engineering improvements for bicycle safety include bike lanes with different classifications, and bicycle signal.

Emphasis Area #4: Intersection Improvements
Description: Collisions involved at intersections, interchanges, and other roadway access.

About 60% of total of collisions took place at or near intersections. 12.9% of the fatal and severe injury collisions in Chino involved intersections, compared to 23.9% statewide.

Goal for Emphasis Area #4
 Reduce the number of crashes at intersections, interchanges, and other roadway access.  Identify hot spots and prioritize locations for intersection improvements.  Apply for funding and implement countermeasures to address collisions at intersections for improvement.

Strategies for Emphasis Area #4:
 Engineering improvement are not limited but could include backplates with reflective borders, left-and right turn lanes at two-way controlled intersections, and improvements to left turn conflict, such as protected left-turn movements.

Emphasis Area #5: Impaired Driving
Description: Collision with evidence of drugs or alcohol use by the driver, even if the driver is not over the legal limit. About 3% of total collisions involved impaired driving. 17.2% of the fatal and severe injury collisions in Chino involved impaired driving, compared to 23.8% statewide.

Goal for Emphasis Area #5
 Reduce the number of crashes attributed to impaired driving.  Identify hot spots and priority corridors for countermeasures to reduce impaired driving.  Apply for funding to implement countermeasures to reduce impaired driving.

Strategies for Emphasis Area #5:
 Increased enforcement near impaired driving hot spots such as a routine patrol, task force operations, and sobriety checkpoints.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 593
CHINO LRSP 2023

28  Implement educational programs and awareness efforts for all ages. Programs can include driver’s education in local schools and with community organizations.

Opportunities
The following provides more information on general identified issues, crash modification factors, improvements, and countermeasures identified for the City of Chino, as well as for specific project locations identified as part of this analysis.

9.1 Infrastructure Improvements

9.1.1 Countermeasure Selection Process
Part D of the HSM provides information on Crash Modification Factors (CMF) for roadway segments, intersections, interchanges, special facilities, and road networks. CMFs are used to estimate the safety effects of highway improvements and apply CMFs to compare and select highway safety improvements. A CMF less than 1.0 indicates that a treatment has the potential to reduce collisions. A CMF greater than 1.0 indicates that a treatment has the potential to increase collisions. The application of an appropriate CMF can influence the decision to implement a particular project, and the misapplication of CMFs can lead to misinformed decisions. Key factors to consider when applying CMFs include:

1. Selection of an appropriate CMF,

2. Estimation of collisions without treatment,

3. Application of CMFs by type and severity, and

4. Estimation of the combined effect for multiple treatments Examples of Safety Countermeasures can be found through several sources. This Report utilizes the countermeasures found in the California LRSM (https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot- media/programs/local-assistance/documents/hsip/2020/lrsm2020.pdf) and the CMF Clearinghouse (CMF CH) website (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/).

Countermeasures for each of the Safety Project Case Studies are based on the data analysis and site visits. Additional countermeasures were identified for the high-level issues on a citywide level and are discussed in Section 9.3 of this Report.

9.1.2 Safety Project Case Studies
From the citywide analysis, 11 project case study locations were selected for further analysis and opportunity identification. For each of these locations, Safety Project Case Studies were developed to provide a case study to organize projects when applying for funding. These locations were identified through the analysis process based on their collision histories, the observed crash patterns, and their differing characteristics to provide the most insight into potential systemic safety countermeasures that the City can employ to achieve the most cost- effective safety benefits.

A Safety Project Case Study was developed for these locations:

1. Segment: Riverside Drive (4th St to Telephone Ave)

2. Segment: Ramona Avenue (Walnut St to Riverside Dr)

3. Segment: Philadelphia Street (Telephone Ave to Central Ave)

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 594
CHINO LRSP 2023

29 4. Segment: Central Ave (Francis Ave to Philadelphia St)

5. Segment: Pipeline Ave (Edison Ave to Eucalyptus Ave)

6. Segment: Roswell Avenue (Schaefer Ave to Grand Ave)

7. Segment: Mountain Avenue (EB SR-60 Ramp to Walnut Ave)

8. Signalized Intersection: Central Ave & Riverside Dr

9. Signalized Intersection: Pipeline Ave & Edison Ave

10. Unsignalized Intersection: Central Ave & Jefferson Ave

11. Unsignalized Intersection: East End Ave & Schaefer Ave

Appendix A contains the Case Study pages which summarize conditions at each location, and potentially beneficial countermeasures. Countermeasures were subjected to a benefit/cost assessment and scored according to their potential return on investment. These case studies can be used to select the most appropriate countermeasure, and to potentially phase improvements over the longer-term. The potential benefit of these countermeasures at locations with similar design characteristics can then be extrapolated regardless of crash history. These case study sheets can also be used to position the City for future grant funding opportunities.

9.2 Non-Infrastructure Improvements
Non-Infrastructure improvements have also been proven to impact safety conditions of the transportation network. These education and enforcement measure opportunities are developed to target specific behavior types and populations. Based on a review of the existing plans, policies, and programs within the City, the following topics have been reviewed to identify areas where the City can implement or enhance safety efforts.

Table 5: Summary of Programs, Policies, and Practices for the City of Chino Topic Initiatives/ Current Status Opportunities for Implementation or Enhancement

COMMITTEES / ROLES
Does the City have an
Active Transportation
Coordinator?
Not officially, role falls under the
Transportation Manager
Continue to house this role with
Transportation Manager; formalize within
job description
Does the City have a
Safety or Active
Advisory Committee?
City has a Traffic Advisory Committee -
Meets monthly on traffic safety related
concerns.

Continue regular TAC meetings
Does the City have an
Active Transportation
Safety Education
Program?
Not officially, educational information
pushed through Public Information Office
Monitor current impacts, modify and
expand current efforts as needed

POLICY / PLANS
Does the City have a
Complete Streets Plan? No Consider implementing a complete streets plan

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 595
CHINO LRSP 2023

30 Does the City assess
Traffic Impact Fees? Yes Monitor current impacts, modify and expand current efforts as needed
Does the City have a
Safe Routes to School
program?
No
Consider implementing a Safe Routes to
School program; seek funding
opportunities to fund this program
Does the City implement
Traffic Calming
Policies?
Yes, but no official policy
Formalize traffic calming policies so
measures can be applied throughout City
where feasible
Does the City regularly
conduct Speed
Surveys?
Yes, recently completed in 2021
Continue to update as required by
California Vehicle Code; review new
guidance from Assembly Bill 43
Does the City utilized
Warrants for Stop Signs
and Signals?
Yes
Continue to use CA MUTCD warrants;
identify areas where additional warrants
can be used (such as flashing stop signs)
Is the City planning for
Density and Walkable
Areas?
Yes Monitor current impacts; modify policies
where necessary
Does the City have
Transportation Demand
Management (TDM)
policies?
Yes Monitor current impacts; modify policies
where necessary
Does the City perform
Traffic Crash
Monitoring?
Crossroads database integration between
PD & Engineering is underway
Monitor progress of integration, once
complete develop monitor program
Does the City have an
Active Transportation
Master Plan?
No
Consider implementing
active transportation
master plan to improve
bike/pedestrian safety and
reduce conflicts with
vehicles
Does the City have
MUTCD-compliant
Pedestrian Signal
Timing?
Yes Continue to implement pedestrian signal
timing where necessary
Does the City implement
Crosswalks at high
pedestrian locations?
Yes Continue to implement where necessary
in new developments
What type of traffic
enforcement does the
City conduct?
Chino has a dedicated Traffic
Enforcement team that regularly conducts
traffic enforcement.

Continue with current
enforcement programs and
continually monitor the
effectiveness of these
programs
What is the City's
Bicycle Policy?
City has a Bicycle & Pedestrian Master
Plan
Monitor impact of current policies; monitor
where needed

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 596
CHINO LRSP 2023

31 What types of transit
does the City have?
OmniTrans, run by San Bernardino
County
Continue to work with OmniTrans to
provide high-quality transit service and
amenities such as shelters, wayfinding
signage, etc.

What types of
wayfinding does the City
have?
Kiosk signage, traffic guide signage
Monitor effectiveness of
wayfinding, expand to
popular locations as needed

DATA COLLECTION / INVENTORY
Does the City have an
Inventory of Pedestrian
Signs and Signals?
City has inventory of traffic signals
Continue to maintain and
update inventory; include pedestrian
infrastructure; digitize in
GIS database if not done so
already
Does the City have an
Inventory/Mapping of
Active Transportation
Routes?
City has maps of pedestrian facilities, bike
facilities and transit facilities
Continue to maintain and update maps as
needed
Does the City utilize
Crossroads Database
for collisions?
Yes, working to integrate PD &
Engineering
Continue to integrate; regularly monitor as
necessary
Does the City have
Active Transportation
Volume Counting?
Only at select locations
Continue traffic & active
transportation volume
collection; utilize this data
in collision analysis

COORDINATION / FEEDBACK
What ways can citizens
give feedback about
roadway safety?
Direct contact, social media, public
meetings
Continue to seek out
resident feedback and
incorporate into policies
and implementations;
expand opportunities for easy feedback
from citizens
What types of
Coordination with other
City organization does
your department
perform?
Coordination across other City
Departments occurs regularly.

Maintain formal
coordination between city
departments; involve in
collision analysis and
planning process.

What types of School
Engagement does the
City perform?
Limited, there is a school district presence
at TAC, other isolated groups do
coordinate with City on various topics of
shared interest.

Continue to coordinate
with schools and district,
involve in collision analysis
and planning process
What types of Law
Enforcement/Emergency
Service Engagement
does the City perform?
City works regularly with Police Dept, is
present at Traffic Advisory Council
meetings
Continue to coordinate
with City police and fire dept; involve in
collision
analysis and planning
process. Engage health
agencies as stakeholder.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 597
CHINO LRSP 2023

32 9.3 General Citywide Countermeasure Toolbox
This evaluation considered citywide trends to identify countermeasures that would likely provide the most benefit with widespread implementation. Countermeasures for each of the 5Es of Safety (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies) were identified. These include both infrastructure opportunities, non-infrastructure opportunities. Table 6 outlines the citywide safety project opportunities, which is also referred to as the “Countermeasure Toolbox”. Within the toolbox, the description of the countermeasure along with its LRSM ID number is listed. The next column, Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) also known as Crash Modification Factor (CMF), are “multiplicative factors used to estimate the expected number of crashes after implementing a given countermeasure at a specific site (the lower the CMF, the greater the expected reduction in crashes)4.” For each of these countermeasures, a planning level benefit/cost analysis was completed.

Applying the benefit/cost at the citywide level was estimated assuming some randomness in crash distribution. The location characteristics, such as whether there is a traffic signal, and the type of crashes, were used at the citywide level to calculate an average cost of crashes that the countermeasure might reduce. The benefit per location was then factored out to a 20-year life- cycle savings, with an Opinion of Project Probable Cost (OPCC) for the initial installation costs and a per-year maintenance cost estimate. The cost shown in Table 6 should be considered initial planning costs using 2022 dollars and not assumed final.

Table 7 describes additional opportunities for the remaining categories of traffic safety which includes Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technology.

4 LRSM Version 1.5 (2020), Page 27

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 598
CHINO LRSP 2023

33 Table 6: Citywide Safety Project Opportunities (Countermeasure Toolbox)

LRSM/CMF
ID Potential Countermeasures
Crash
Reduction
Factor
Per Unit Cost Unit
NS03 Install signals 30% $270,000 per
intersection
NS05 Convert intersection to roundabout (from stop or yield control on minor road) 35% $750,000 per
intersection
NS07 Upgrade intersection pavement markings (NS.I.) 25% $22,000 per intersection
NS09 Install flashing beacons as advance warning (NS.I.) 30% $20,000 per beacon NS14 Install raised median on approaches (NS.I.) 25% $30,000 per approach
NS15 Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (NS.I.) 50% $45,000 per
structure
NS17 Install right-turn lane (NS.I.) 20% $55,000 per location R01 Add segment lighting 35% $50,000 per mile
R04 Install Guardrail 25% $50,000 per location
R26 Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs 30% $16,000 per sign R28 Install edge-lines and centerlines 15% $60,000 per linear mile
R32PB Install bike lanes 35% $45,000 per mile
R33PB Install Separated Bike Lanes 45% $250,000 per mile S02 Improve signal hardware; lenses, back plate with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number 15% $24,000 per
intersection
S03 Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) 15% $8,000 per intersection
S04 Provide Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection for high-speed approaches 40% $34,000 per intersection
S09 Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through intersection) 10% $7,667 per intersection

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 599
CHINO LRSP 2023

34 LRSM/CMF
ID Potential Countermeasures
Crash
Reduction
Factor
Per Unit Cost Unit
S18PB Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) 25% $50,000 per intersection
S18PB Install pedestrian crossing/crosswalk (S.I.) 25% $50,000 per intersection
S21PB Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 60% $7,667 per intersection

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 600
CHINO LRSP 2023

35 Non-Engineering Safety Strategy Countermeasures:

These potential countermeasures were derived from the collision analysis and build on the actions identified in Section 9.2. These relate to the additional Es of Traffic Safety outside of Engineering. This includes Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services and Emerging Technologies.

Table 7: Non-Engineering Safety Strategy Countermeasures

PROPOSED COUNTERMEASURE POTENTIAL PARTNERS EXAMPLES OF COUNTERMEASURE

ENFORCEMENT
Police traffic services to enhance enforcement and
compliance with impaired driving and other traffic
laws
Local law enforcement

Selective enforcement which includes
DUI check points and monitor hot spot
locations. Grant funding OTS California
Office of Traffic Safety
Safe routes to school for a safe and accessible
commute to walk/bike to school for students and
parents.

SCAG, local law enforcement, local school
districts
Active Transportation Programs (ATP),
educational programs, SRTS Action
Plans

EDUCATION
Educational programs for all ages to enhance their
skills on traffic regulations and behavior impacts
Local school districts, Local law
enforcement, CHP, Office of Traffic Safety
Interactive programs at local schools
and involvement from parents,
teachers, and community to mentor
traffic safety, OTS California Office of
Traffic Safety.

Safety campaigns to raise awareness and eliminate
traffic fatalities and injuries (aggressive driving,
distracted driving, impaired driving, ped/bike safety)
Local law enforcement, SCAG
Series of campaigns on multiple
platforms with efforts to improve
behaviors and safety on the roads, OTS
California Office of Traffic Safety.

Safety programs targeted to reduce bike and
pedestrians’ collisions
SCAG, local school districts, local law
enforcement
SCAG Kit of Parts implementations,
testing temporary safety improvements
and receive feedback from participants

EMERGENCY SERVICES
Traffic Management Plans/Temporary Traffic
Control to move motorist through work zone
effectively and safety.

Local law enforcement, Caltrans, and fire
department
Timely project-related information
through multiple platforms and
scheduled passages through roadway
construction zones, Caltrans

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 601
CHINO LRSP 2023

36 PROPOSED COUNTERMEASURE POTENTIAL PARTNERS EXAMPLES OF COUNTERMEASURE Involvement of emergency services as actives roles
in projects and interdepartmental communication
among city and emergency services.

Local law enforcement, public health
agencies, and fire departments
Incorporate emergency services
agencies as stakeholders in projects.

EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Emergence of new technology to ensure safety, and
accessibility
City Public Works, City Engineering
Department, Caltrans
Using data as benefit for digital maps,
safety analysis, signals, and micro-
mobility
Implementing new and best possible
countermeasures for safety improvement for
motorist, bicyclist, and pedestrians
City Public Works, City Engineering
Department, Caltrans
Utilization of advanced technology to
improve safety

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 602
CHINO LRSP 2023

37 Evaluation & Implementation

10.1 Evaluation
The success of the LRSP will be evaluated using the preliminary process outlined below. This process will be useful to ensure proper implementation of goals and to determine when updates are needed.
 Quarterly progress meetings will be conducted to track the implementation of the plan. In addition, the success of the plan will be evaluated on an annual basis.  An update to the plan should be considered within five years.  Continued monitoring and recording of traffic incidents on local roadways by law enforcement.
 Maintain a list of focus areas where there are transportation safety concerns.

10.2 Implementation
Implementation of the LRSP can be accomplished through several avenues including development of projects, the establishment of new policies and programs, and development/strengthening of relationships with stakeholders.

Regarding projects, the following identifies potential focus areas for the City in the near-to-mid- term.

Near- & Mid-Term Focus Areas
The opportunities identified in this report provide more of the systemic countermeasures that can be applied within the City. Over the next three to five years, the City can concentrate its efforts on the emphasis areas:

1. Commercial Vehicles

2. Aggressive Driving

3. Vulnerable Road Users (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)

4. Intersection Improvements

5. Impaired Driving
Analysis conducted at the citywide level indicated that these factors were some of the most frequent influences contributing to collisions within the City. The countermeasure opportunities previously discussed in this report for both systemic and project-specific improvements can be used as a basis for developing projects at locations where addressing these focus areas would be of the most benefit. Projects that address these focused areas can be developed with a high benefit-to-cost ratio (by applying Citywide collision rates), allowing projects to be developed even at sites with little to no direct collision history, but with conditions that might contribute to future collisions.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 603
CHINO LRSP 2023

38 10.3 Funding
Competitive funding resources are available to assist in the development and implementation of safety projects in Chino. The City should continue to seek available funding and grant opportunities from local, state, and federal resources to accelerate their ability to implement safety improvements throughout Chino. The following is a high-level introduction into some of the main funding programs and grants for which the City can apply. The City should also work with regional agencies such as SBCTA and SCAG to identify and apply for safety improvement funding.

10.3.1 Highway Safety Improvement Program
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a Federal program housed under Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. This program apportions funding as a lump sum for each state, which is then divided among apportioned programs. These flexible funds can be used for projects to preserve or improve safety conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, facilities for non-motorized transportation, and other project types. Example safety improvement projects eligible for this funding include:
 New or upgraded traffic signals
 Upgraded guard rails
 Pedestrian warning flashing beacons
 Marked crosswalks
California’s local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with national recognized crash reduction factors. Normally HSIP call-for-projects is made at an interval of one to two years. The applicant must be a city, a county, or a tribal government federally recognized within the State of California.

Additional information regarding this program at the Federal level can be found online at:
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/. California specific HSIP information – including dates for upcoming call for projects - can be found at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.html.

10.3.2 Caltrans Active Transportation Program
Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a statewide funding program, created in 2013, consolidating several federal and state programs. The ATP funds projects that encourage increased mode share for walking and bicycling, improve mobility and safety for non-motorized users, enhance public health, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Projects eligible for this funding include:
 Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects
 Bicycle and pedestrian planning projects (e.g. safe routes to school)  Non-infrastructure programs (education and enforcement) This program funding is provided annually. The ATP call for projects typically comes out in the spring. Information on this program and cycles can be found online at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 604
CHINO LRSP 2023

39 10.3.3 State Transportation Improvement Program
The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) provides state and federal gas tax money for improvements both on and off the state highway system. STIP programming occurs every two years. The programming cycle begins with the release of a proposed fund estimate, followed by California Transportation Commission (CTC) adoption of the fund estimate. The fund estimate serves to identify the amount of new funds available for the programming of transportation projects. Once the fund estimate is adopted, Caltrans and the regional planning agencies prepare transportation improvement plans for submittal. Caltrans prepares the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) using Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds, and regional agencies prepare Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIPs) using Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. The STIP is then adopted by the CTC.

10.3.4 California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)
SB 1 is a landmark transportation investment to rebuild California by fixing neighborhood streets, freeways and bridges in communities across California and targeting funds toward transit and congested trade and commute corridor improvements.

California’s state-maintained transportation infrastructure will receive roughly half of SB 1 revenue: $26 billion. The other half will go to local roads, transit agencies and an expansion of the state’s growing network of pedestrian and cycle routes. Each year, this new funding will be used to tackle deferred maintenance needs both on the state highway system and the local road system, including:
 Bike and Pedestrian Projects: $100 million
o This will go to cities, counties and regional transportation agencies to build or convert more bike paths, crosswalks and sidewalks. It is a significant increase in funding for these projects through the Active Transportation Program (ATP).  Local Planning Grants: $25 million

10.3.5 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grants This program has funding for projects related to traffic safety, including transportation safety education and encouragement activities. Grants applications must be supported by local crash data (such as the data analyzed in this report) and must relate to the following priority program areas:
 Alcohol Impaired Driving
 Distracted Driving
 Drug-Impaired Emergency Medical Services
 Motorcycle Safety
 Occupant Protection
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
 Police Traffic Services
 Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program
 Roadway Safety and Traffic Records

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 605
CHINO LRSP 2023

40 10.3.6 SCAG Sustainable Communities Program (SCP)
This program is an innovative vehicle for promoting local jurisdictional efforts to test local planning tools. The SCP provides direct technical assistance to SCAG member jurisdictions to complete planning and policy efforts to implement the regional Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS). Grants are available in the following three categories:
 Integrated Land Use
o Sustainable Land Use Planning
o Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
o Land Use & Transportation Integration
 Active Transportation
o Bicycle Planning
o Pedestrian Planning
o Safe Routes to School Plans
 Green Region
o Natural Resource Plans
o Climate Action Plans (CAPs)
o Green House Gas (GHG) Reduction programs

10.4 Next Steps
The City of Chino has completed this LRSP to guide the process of future transportation safety improvements for years to come. The data-driven analysis process identified collision types, related primary collision factors, and locations of many collisions. Based on this process, Emphasis Areas were developed. These Emphasis Areas will guide corridor improvements, education programs, and capital improvements for the City.

Using the analyzed data and outputs from this LRSP, the City can complete the following tasks:
 Actively seek other funding opportunities to improve safety for all modal users  Collaborate with established safety partners & neighboring municipalities as improvements are made to create a cohesive transportation network  Iteratively evaluate existing and proposed transportation safety programs and capital improvements to design a safer transportation network in Chino  Continually review collision data and update the analysis performed in this report  Monitor collision activity at locations where improvements were made to determine their impacts
Based on current Caltrans guidelines, the LRSP is valid for 5 years from date of completion for eligibility for HSIP grant funding.

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 606
CHINO LRSP 2023

Appendix A: Case Study Sheets

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 607
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Case Study Sheet: Location # 1
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Central Ave + Jefferson Avenue
Examples of Similar Intersections: Central Ave & Park St ; Benson Ave & Monroe St Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 3
Total Entering Vehicles 18,800
Crosswalk Condition No
Control Type Unsignalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Median Yes: north/south
direction
Collision Data
Total Collisions 14
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
3 Top 3 Collision Types Broadside: 4
Rear-end: 6
Sideswipe:4
Total Nighttime Collisions 1
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
14 0 0
N
N
Additional Notes:
• High number of broadsides, rear-ends, and sideswipes
• Many near miss collisions in this area for left-turning vehicles

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 608
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash
Modification
Factor (LRSM/

CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety
Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs Safety Related B/C
All Restrict left-turn from Central
Ave & Jefferson Ave NS15 $1,416,800 $15,000 94.45

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 609
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Case Study Sheet: Location # 2
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Central Avenue + Riverside Drive
Examples of Similar Intersections: Schaefer Ave + Ramona Ave; Central Ave + Schaefer Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 11,100
Crosswalk Condition Yes
Control Type Signalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Median Yes: north and south
directions
Collision Data
Total Collisions 57
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
5 Top 3 Collision Types Rear-end: 16
Sideswipe: 13
Broadside:11
Total Nighttime Collisions 11
Wet Surface Collisions 3
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 2

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
53 3 1
N
N
Additional Notes:
• Heavy volumes on left-turn movements
• Lane change on Central Ave south of intersection

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 610
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash
Modification
Factor (LRSM/

CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety
Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs Safety Related B/C
Ped/bike Leading Pedestrian Interval S21PB $6,133,200 $7,667 799.95 All Advanced dilemma zone
detection S04 $9,554,720 $34,000 281.02
All Traffic signal coordination S03 $3,583,020 $15,334 233.67 All Retroreflective backplates S02 $3,583,020 $24,000 149.29 Ped/bike High visibility crosswalks S18PB $5,971,700 $50,000 119.43

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 611
Project Template: Location # 3
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Central Avenue: Francis Avenue to Philadelphia Street Similar Segments: S Grove Ave: Philadelphia St & Francis St; Benson Ave: Francis Ave to Philadelphia St Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 32,100
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 33
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
6 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-end: 6
Sideswipe: 3
Broadside: 3
Total Nighttime Collisions 3
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
28 3 2

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• High number of broadside, rear-end, and sideswipe collisions N
N

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 612
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All
Reconfigure left-turn pocket
at senior center north of
Country Fair
NS15 $1,177,400 $15,000 78.49
County Fair Intersection
All Leading Pedestrian Interval
(LPI) S21PB $1,412,880 $7,667 184.28
All Retroreflective backplates S02 $1,011,660 $12,000 84.31 All Advanced dilemma zone
detection S04 $2,697,760 $34,000 79.35
Ped/
bike Complete crosswalk S18PB $588,700 $50,000 11.77

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 613
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Case Study Sheet: Location # 4
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: East End Avenue + Schaefer Avenue
Examples of Similar Intersections: Roswell Ave & Grand Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 2
Total Entering Vehicles 12,050
Crosswalk Condition No
Control Type Unsignalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 15 mph
Median Yes
Collision Data
Total Collisions 7
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
1 Top 3 Collision Types Hit-Object: 5
Head-On: 2
Total Nighttime Collisions 6
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 2

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
7 0 0
N
N
Additional Notes:
• High speeds
• Crashes occuring during weekend days
• Drivers approaching curve at high speeds

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 614
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash
Modification
Factor (LRSM/

CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety
Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs Safety Related B/C
All Flashing beacon on curve
warning signage
30%
(NS09) $347,640 $40,000 8.69
All Increased lighting 35%
(R01) $405,580 $50,000 8.11
All Install guardrail on curve 25%
(R04) $289,700 $50,000 5.79
All Narrow lanes going into curve 5% $57,940 $20,000 2.90 All Merge WB Schaefer to one lane
before signal 5% $57,940 $50,000 1.16
All Install roundabout 35%
(NS05) $405,580 $750,000 0.54
All Protected bike lane 45%
(R33PB) - $80,000 -

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 615
Project Template: Location # 5
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Mountain Avenue: EB SR-60 to Walnut Avenue
Similar Segments: Central Ave: Walnut Ave to EB SR- 60; Ramona Ave: Walnut Ave to EB SR-60 Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 29,000
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 15
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
0 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-end: 7
Broadside: 6
Sideswipe: 1
Total Nighttime Collisions 4
Wet Surface Collisions 3
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
14 1 0

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• Four collisions at night
• NB traffic backs up in the afternoon
• Wide curb lane on NB Mountain Ave
NN

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 616
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Install bike lanes along
Mountain Ave
R32PB $1,057,840 $30,000 18.97
All
Left-turn restrictions at
Fillmore St and shopping
center driveway
NS15 $569,200 $30,000 35.26
All Possible traffic signal at
Fillmore St NS03 $906,720 $810,000 1.12

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 617
Project Template: Location # 6
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Philadelphia Street: Telephone Avenue to Central Avenue Similar Segments: Philadelphia St: Ramona Ave to Yorba Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,200
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 14
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
2 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Broadside: 6
Rear-end: 3
Sideswipe: 3
Total Nighttime Collisions 6
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
11 2 1

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• High number of broadsides and sideswipe collisions
• Left-turn collisions at driveways
N
N

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 618
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Refresh lane markings and
striping (thermoplastic) S09 $312,880 $30,668 10.20 All
Install bollards or raised
median to address left-turn
collisions at driveways
NS14 $782,200 $30,000 26.07

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 619
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Case Study Sheet: Location # 7
Project Location Description & Maps:

Intersection: Pipeline Ave + Edison Avenue
Examples of Similar Intersections: Euclid Ave & Edison Ave; Ramona Ave & Edison Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Number of Approaches 4
Total Entering Vehicles 81,000
Crosswalk Condition Yes
Control Type Signalized
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 45 mph
Median Yes all directions
Collision Data
Total Collisions 34
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
5 Top 3 Collision Types Broadside: 12
Sideswipe: 10
Rear-end: 5
Total Nighttime Collisions 11
Wet Surface Collisions 3
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 3

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
31 1 2
N
N
Additional Notes:
• Pipeline Ave changes from 2 lanes to 3 lanes
• Construction ongoing on ADA ramps
• Heavy truck traffic
• SBR sight distance issues
• Red lighting running common
• Yellow/ All red clearance is not enough for the left-turn vehicles that make the yellow

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 620
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash
Modification
Factor (LRSM/

CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety
Benefit
Total 20-Year
Costs Safety Related B/C
Ped/Bike Install Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) S21PB 729,840 $7,667 95.19
All Install retroreflective backplates S02 901,680 $12,000 75.14 All Install advanced dilemma zone
detection S04 2,404,480 $34,000 70.72
All Update yellow/red times S03 901,680 $30,668 29.40
All Install guidance signage and
markings S09 601,120 $30,668 19.60
All Add signal head to mast arm S02 12,000 $48,000 18.79 Ped/Bike Install shared path for bicycles
and pedestrians R33PB 547,380 $100,000 5.47

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 621
Project Template: Location # 8
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Pipeline Avenue: Edison Avenue to Eucalyptus Avenue Similar Segments: Walnut Ave: S Reservoir St to East End Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21,200
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 19
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
5 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Broadside: 6
Rear-end: 6
Sideswipe: 4
Total Nighttime Collisions 3
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
18 1 0

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• Traffic backs up at Spectrum and Eucalyptus signals
• Space available for right-turn pockets before driveways • Best Buy regional warehouse along Pipeline
• Very large church congregation that uses a lot of parking nearby; high number of collisions on Sunday N
N

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 622
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All
Restripe SB Pipeline curb
lane as right-turn pocket at
driveways
NS17 $2,572,640 $55,000 46.78
Ped/
Bike
Leading Pedestrian Interval
(LPI) S21PB $341,520 $7,667 44.54
All Retroreflective backplates S02 $1,929,480 $24,000 80.40 All Right out only signage and
striping at driveways NS15 $6,431,600 $45,000 142.92
All Implement coordinate
timing to enforce speeds S03 $1,929,480 $8,000 241.19
All Advanced dilemma zone
detection S04 $5,145,280 $68,000 75.67

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 623
Project Template: Location # 9
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Riverside Drive: 4th Street to Telephone Ave
Similar Segments: Walnut Ave: Cedar Ave to Chestnut Pl
Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,000
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 13
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
3 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-end: 6
Broadside: 5
Sideswipe:1
Total Nighttime Collisions 3
Wet Surface Collisions 2
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 1

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
13 0 0

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• High number of broadsides and rear-ends
NN

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 624
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Install ‘Keep Clear’
markings at intersections NS07 $2,810,400 $22,000 127.75 All
Prohibit left-turns from
Telephone Ave and 4th
Street (using flexible
delineators)
NS15 $5,620,800 $60,000 93.68

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 625
Project Template: Location # 10
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Ramona Avenue: Walnut Avenue to Riverside Dr
Similar Segments: Benson Ave: Walnut Ave to Riverside Dr Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,000
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 36
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
5 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Rear-end: 25
Broadside: 5
Sideswipe: 5
Total Nighttime Collisions 9
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 3

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
36 0 0

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• High number of rear-ends
• 22% of collisions during school hours (7am to 2:30pm) • Freeway entrance to the north
• Flashing beacon at school
• Wide lanes
• High number of unlicensed drivers in this corridor
• Heavily congested in peak direction during AM and PM peaks NN

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 626
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All Speed feedback signage R26 $4,698,120 $32,000 146.82 All
Install edgeline striping to
delineate between travel
lanes and parking lanes
R28 $2,349,060 $60,000 39.15
All Install bicycle lanes (replace
parking lanes) R32PB $5,481,140 $45,000 121.80

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 627
Project Template: Location # 11
Project Name: Chino LRSP
Agency Name: Chino
Contact Name: Dennis Ralls, T.E.

Email: [email protected]
Prepared by: Kimley-Horn
Checked by: Jean Fares, P .E.

Date: March 2022
Project Location Description & Maps:

Segment: Roswell Avenue: Schaefer Avenue to Grand Avenue Similar Segments: Monte Vista Ave: Schaefer Ave to Edison Ave Traffic and Geometric Data:

Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 15,400
Lighting Yes
Highest Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
Collision Data
Total Collisions 12
Fatal and Injury
Collisions
2 Top 3 Collision Types
(percentage)
Broadside: 9
Rear-end: 1
Sideswipe: 1
Total Nighttime Collisions 5
Wet Surface Collisions 0
Drug and Alcohol Related
Collisions 0

INTERSECTION
Collision Breakdown
Veh vs. Veh Veh vs. Ped Veh vs. Bike
10 1 1

SEGMENT
Additional Notes:
• Heavy volumes from Kaiser office
• Roswell is a major bypass and is frequently congested • Left-turn restriction on driveways often ignored
• Issues with sight distance at 2nd driveway on NB Roswell • No crosswalk at Schaefer across Roswell Ave
NN

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 628
Countermeasure Evaluation
Primary
Issues
Potential
Countermeasures
Crash Modification
Factor
(LRSM/CMF ID)
20 Year
Safety Benefit
Total
20-Year
Costs
Safety
Related
B/C
All
Install freeway guidance
signage at Roswell and
Grand Ave
S09 $302,240 $30,668 9.86
All Extend stop bar at
driveways NS07 $755,600 $22,000 34.35
All Complete crosswalk at
Roswell/Schaefer S18PB $284,600 $50,000 5.69
All Targeted enforcement on
left-turn restrictions - Varies Varies Varies

12.16.a
Adopt the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Packet Pg. 629

Revenue: Expenditure: 3227190-TR152, 3227190 -TR214, 3227190 - 40010-TR211 ,

Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023

TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER

FROM: AMER JAKHER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT - TR152, TR211, & TR214 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET AND WIRING UPGRADES.

RECOMMENDATION
1) Appropriate $156,146 from the unappropriated reserves of the Road Maintenance Rehab Account Fund 327, with a corresponding increase to the Traffic Signal Modification Project (TR211) for a revised project budget of $419,476.67; 2) award a construction contract in the amount of $613,571 to International Line Builders, Inc. dba ILB Electric, Corona, CA, for Projects TR152, TR211, and TR214 - Traffic Signal Cabinet and Wiring Upgrades at Various Locations; 3) authorize expenditures of up to $92,035 for construction contingency for a total construction contract amount not-to-exceed $705,606; 4) authorize expenditures of $61,360 for construction management and $30,681 for inspection costs; and 4) authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
Requires an appropriation in the amount of $156,146 from the unappropriated reserves of the Road Maintenance Rehab Account Fund 327,with a corresponding increase to the Traffic Signal Modification Project (TR211). There are sufficient funds in the FY2022-23 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Projects,TR152 and TR214.

CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:

The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Responsible Long-Range Planning
• Effective Technology

12.17 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 630
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT - TR152, TR211, & TR214 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET

AND WIRING UPGRADES
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
Project Nos. TR152, TR211, and TR214 - Traffic Signal Cabinet and Wiring Upgrades at Various Locations is part of the Fiscal Year 2021 -2022 Capital Improvement Program Budget and includes upgrading and re -wiring new Econolit e ‘P’ traffic signal cabinets at intersections Philadelphia and Telephone Avenues, Riverside Drive and Magnolia Avenue, Riverside and Mountain Avenue, and Philadelphia and Town Square.

The project’s scope was prepared by the City’s Transportation Division and consists of the replacement of existing traffic signal cabinets with new Econolite ‘P’ traffic signal cabinets , bringing them up to current City of Chino Standards. The project also includes full rewiring of the intersection, including new detector loop cables, installation of new pull boxes in intersections with Tier 22 #6 and vaults, and installation of new 4” conduit crossing the intersection to address worsening maintenance issues.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
On June 15, 2022, staff published a formal Notice In viting Bids (IFB 2022 -7024) via the City’s PlanetBids website and locally on the Chino Champion Newspaper on June 15 and June 25, 2022, for Project Nos. TR152, TR211, and TR214 - Traffic Signal Cabinet and Wiring Upgrades at Various Locations. On July 13, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., ten (10) bids were received and opened with the following results:

Company Name City Base Bid Amount
International Line Builders, Inc. Corona, CA $613,571.00 California Professional Engineering, Inc. La Puente, CA $696,000.00 Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. Chino, CA $723,460.00
Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc. Irwindale, CA $756,365.00 Select Electric, Inc. Vista, CA $887,075.00
Servitek Electric, Inc. Walnut, CA $924,639.00
Asplundh Construction, LLC Buena Park, CA $958,908.50
PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. Riverside, CA $995,059.00 KDC Inc. Los Alamitos, CA $1,023,000.00
Calpromax Engineering, Inc. Placentia, CA $1,126,000.00

The estimated project costs are itemized by project below:

TR152
Project Task Budget Amount
Construction $154,758.00
Construction Management (10%) $15,476.00
Inspection (5%) $7,738.00
SUBTOTAL COST $177,972.00
Construction Contingency (15%) $23,214.00
EST. PROJECT COST TOTAL $201,186.00

12.17 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 631
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT - TR152, TR211, & TR214 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET

AND WIRING UPGRADES
PAGE 3

TR211
Project Task Budget Amount
Construction $322,672.00
Construction Management (10%) $32,269.00
Inspection (5%) $16,135.00
SUBTOTAL COST $371,076.00
Construction Contingency (15%) $48,400.00
EST. PROJECT COST TOTAL $419,476.00

TR214
Project Task Budget Amount
Construction $136,141.00
Construction Management (10%) $13,615.00
Inspection (5%) $6,808.00
SUBTOTAL COST $156,564.00
Construction Contingency (15%) $20,421.00
EST. PROJECT COST TOTAL $176,985.00

The low bidder, International Line Builders, Inc., Corona, CA , is properly licensed and deemed the lowest responsible bidder with a base bid in the amount of $ 613,571. Staff will not be including the additive alternative bid item that was included in the RFP.

Therefore, staff recommends that City Council approve an appropriation of $156, 146.00 from the unappropriated Road Maintenance Rehab Account with a corresponding increase to the project budget of the Traffic Signal Modification Project (TR211). Staff also recommends that the City Council award a construction contract to International Line Builders, Inc. dba ILB Electric, Corona, CA , for Project Nos. TR152, TR211, and TR214 - Traffic Signal Cabinet and Wiring Upgrades at Various Locations in the amount of $613,571 and $92,035 for construction contingency for a total contract amount not -to-exceed $705,606 . In addition, staff is also requesting authorization to spend up to $6 1,360 for construction management costs and $30,681 for inspection costs.

Attachment: Agreement - International Line Builders, Inc. dba ILB Electric

12.17 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 632

12.17.a
Award of Contract - TR152, TR211, & TR214 Traffic Signal Packet Pg. 633

12.17.a
Award of Contract - TR152, TR211, & TR214 Traffic Signal Packet Pg. 634

12.17.a
Award of Contract - TR152, TR211, & TR214 Traffic Signal Packet Pg. 635

12.17.a
Award of Contract - TR152, TR211, & TR214 Traffic Signal Packet Pg. 636

12.17.a
Award of Contract - TR152, TR211, & TR214 Traffic Signal Packet Pg. 637

Revenue: Expenditure: 3207100 | 3227190 - 48005 | 48007 | 48009 - MS202 3277102 - 48005 | 48007 | 48009 -
ST221.

Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023

TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER

FROM: AMER JAKHER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION - MS202/ST221 SIDEWALK/CROSSING ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS AND NORTON CUL-DE-SAC.

RECOMMENDATION
1) Accept Chino Avenue and Norton Avenue Cul -De-Sac Accessibility Improvement Project (MS202 and ST221) by EBS General Engineering, Inc., Corona, CA, Contract 2022 -311, as complete; 2) release the retention fund s following the 35 -day lien period; and 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to file the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was completed within the two established CIP project budgets MS202 and ST221 .

The remaining funds will be returned to the proper fund balance.

CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:

The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Responsible Long-Range Planning

12.18 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 638
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION - MS202/ST221 SIDEWALK/CROSSING ACCESS

IMPROVEMENTS AND NORTON CUL-DE-SAC
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
On May 17, 2021, City Council awarded a construction contract to EBS General Engineering, Inc., Coro na, CA, in the amount of $446,249.00. Additionally, City Council authorized expenditures of up to $44,624.90 for construction management, $44,624.90 for project contingencies, and $22,312.45 for inspection costs.

The scope of work for the Chino Avenue (MS202) and Norton Avenue Cul-de-sac Project (ST221) includes reconstruction of the curb ramps along Chino Avenue between Benson Avenue and Oaks Avenue as well as the construction of sidewalk and curb ramps at the Norton Avenue Cul-de-sac just north of the State Route 60 freeway. Completing these improvements will provide safe and compliant crosswalks, sidewalks, and curb ramps.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
All work has been completed per the terms of the construction contract 2022-311. The following is a summary of the final accounting of costs for construction:

Project # MS 202 Contract Contingency
Original Contract & Contingency $314,647.00 $31,464.70
Change Order #1 $4,955.16 -$4,955.16
Change Order #2 $17,984.50 -17,984.50
Final Contract & Contingency $337,586.66 $8,525.04

Project # ST221 Contract Contingency
Original Contract & Contingency $131,602.00 $13,160.20
Change Order #1 $6,027.51 -$6,027.51
Change Order #2 $4,743.60 -4,743.60
Final Contract & Contingency $142,373.11 $2,389.09

It should be noted Proj ect No. MS202 Sidewalk/Crossing Access Improvements shall remain open for the remainder of FY2022/23; this project number assists in identifying all funding for Accessibility related projects in the City’s Capital Improvement Program.

EBS General Engineeri ng, Inc., Corona, CA, has complied with the terms of the contract. A Notice of Completion has been prepared for filing with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. The retention funds will be released following the 35-day lien period.

Attachments: Notice of Completion - EBS General Engineering, Inc. (MS202 & ST221)

12.18 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 639

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Chino
Public Works Department
P.O. Box 667
Chino, CA 91708

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

City Clerk
City of Chino
P.O. Box 667
Chino, CA 91708-0667
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

CITY OF CHINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Notice is hereby given that:

1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.

2. The full name of the undersigned is City of Chino

3. The full address of the undersigned is 13220 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 91710

4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee (If other than fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase” or “lessee”)

5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned are:

Names Addresses

N/A

N/A

6. The names of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to:

Names Addresses

N/A

N/A
(If no transfer made, insert “none”)

7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on March 7, 2023

8. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was:

EBS General Engineering, Inc.
(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “none”)

9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Chino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows:

Chino Avenue and Norton Avenue Accessibility & Curb Ramp Improvement Project (MS202 & ST221)

10. The street address of said property is None
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”)

SIGNATURE OF OWNER NAMED IN PARAGRAPH 2: DATE: 3/7/2023 Amer Jakher, Director of Public Works

CERTIFICATION FOR NOTICE OF COMPLETION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )ss

CITY OF CHINO )

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Director of Public Works for the City of Chino. I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; and I certify that the same is true of my own knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 7, 2023 , at City of Chino, California

Amer Jakher
Director of Public Works

12.18.a
Notice of Completion - MS202/ST221 Sidewalk/Crossing
Packet Pg. 640

Revenue: Expenditure: 3207100 - 40010 - ST182 .

Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023

TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER

FROM: AMER JAKHER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CHINO HIGH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

RECOMMENDATION
1) Approve increases to applicable costs associated with the City's share of the Reimbursement Agreement 2021202, with Chino Valley Unified School District for the Chino High School Reconstruction Project ST182 by $414,291.77, for a revised not-to-exceed agreement amount of $1,541,291.77 and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute necessary documents on behalf of the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is sufficient project balance in ST182 for the increase to the reimbursement agreement.

There was an internal project budget transfer processed to move $250,000 from project ST231 Local Street Rehabilitation FY2023 to ST182 Chino High School Reconstruction Project to cover the budget shortfall for this agreement. The FY2022 -23 revised starting project balance for ST182 is $1,344,249.52.

CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:

The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues tha t serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Responsible Long-Range Planning
• Public Service Excellence through Internal and External Partnerships

12.19 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 641
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CHINO HIGH SCHOOL

RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
On January 5, 2021, the City Council approved a Reimbursement Agreement between the City and the Chino Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) for the design and construction of certain off-site street, pedestrian, and utility improvements associated with the Chino High Scho ol reconstruction project. The required improvements include, but are not limited to, street and curb ramp improvements, driveways, streetlights, sidewalks, curb, gutter, and crosswalks along the perimeter of Chino High School. In collaboration with CVUSD , the City entered into the Reimbursement Agreement such that some of the public improvements would be the financial responsibility of the City due to the location and/or scope of the improvements.

The table below outlines the anticipated estimated costs to each participating agency at the time the City entered into the Reimbursement Agreement. The total estimated City share for the project was $1,127,000.

Task Description City Share District Share Total Est. Project Cost Engineering Cost Estimate f or
Construction of Offsite improvements
$857,000 $5,061,368 $5,918,368
Estimated Design Costs $90,000 $445,000 $535,000
Estimated Construction Management $180,000 $852,918 $1,032,918 Estimated Total $1,127,000 $6,359,286 $7,486,286

At the January 5, 2 021 City Council Meeting, the City’s contribution to CVUSD for design, construction, construction management, and inspection costs under terms of the Reimbursement Agreement was appropriated to project ST182, which increased the overall project budget for the Chino High School Reconstruction Project to $1,468,960.05. This project budget includes the City’s estimated share of $1,127,000 and additional smaller project costs such as permitting, plan check, and associated utility fees that will be shared betwee n the City and CVUSD proportionally as they occur.

At the November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting, additional funds were appropriated to project ST 182 in the amount of $170,339.54 for anticipated design costs, increasing the City's share of design costs to $260,339.54.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
In May 2021, CVUSD awarded contracts to the lowest responsive, responsible bidders on four separate bid packages to construct the offsite improvements for sewer line, street lighting, storm drain, fire services, and street i mprovements. The City’s share of these improvements primarily consists of construction of directional accessible curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement rehabilitation, and signing and striping along the outer edge of the high school perimeter frontage, as shown on the Comprehensive Off -Site Street Improvement Scope Exhibit. These facilities have been designed in accordance with the City’s Policy on Accessible Pedestrian Facilities and the California Building Code.

During construction of the street improvements in July 2022, the paving contractor encountered the existing cross slope of the perimeter roadways, Jefferson Street and Tenth Street, to be between 5 and 8-percent in several locations where the design did not account for re-grading of

12.19 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 642
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CHINO HIGH SCHOOL

RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
PAGE 3

the road. In order to construct compliant crosswalks, the running slope (or roadway cross slope) is required to be less than 5 -percent. Additional site survey concluded that a larger area of roadway reconstruction is necessary in order to meet the accessibility standards and maintain a smooth driving surface. The additional work triggered potential extensive project change orders under the existing contracts affecting both the CVUSD and City budgets. CVUSD and City staff agreed to de-scope the pavement and corresponding curb ramp work from the contracted work in order to re-design and re-bid the work for estimated completion in the summer of 2023. The decision was made to properly allow time for the redesign effort and undergo a compet itive bid process for the remaining street improvement work. Only a portion of the offsite street improvement work was completed under the original bid work.

Civil design costs related to the re -design and additional survey were allocated per City Coun cil approval on November 1, 2022. CVUSD published the notice inviting bids for the remaining work in December 2022 and has awarded construction contracts to the lowest responsive, responsible bidders for the demolition and asphalt, and concrete packages a t their March 2, 2023 Board Meeting. City staff has reviewed the summary of bids and schedule of values for the City’s share of work. City staff has requested CVUSD remove certain ramps that require acquisition of right of way from the City’s share of wor k. Ramps prioritized to be constructed with this project are in locations where they are currently missing and where they will best provide improved access for students. The City will complete construction of the deferred ramps through a Capital Improvement Project when the right of way has been acquired.

The City’s share of construction costs to complete this project are itemized below:

Estimated Construction Costs for Construction of Off -site Improvements (certain ramps removed from scope)
Construction Expenses Through February 2023 (original bid work) $127,432.76 Estimated Construction Expenses through project completion (re-bid work) $752,727.00 Total Estimated Construction Costs (no contingency) $880,159.76 Construction Contingency $88,015.97
Total Estimated Construction Costs (with contingency) $968,175.73

The associated Construction Management costs for the project are also anticipated to exceed the original estimate. Per the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement, Construction Management c osts are a pro -rated share of the CVUSD’s construction management costs arising in connection with CVUSD’s Construction Management Services Agreement. The allocation is determined based on the actual construction costs for the project, therefore the increase in construction costs and extended duration of work will incrementally increase the City’s share of the Construction Management costs.

The City’s share of Construction Management Costs is itemized below:

Estimated Construction Management Costs
Construction Management Expenses Through February, 2023 $230,688.50 Estimated New Construction Management through project completion $82,088.00 Total Estimated Construction Management Costs $312,776.50

12.19 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 643
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CHINO HIGH SCHOOL

RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
PAGE 4

The City’s revised estimated share for the project is summarized below:

Task Description Original Estimate Revised Estimate
Design Costs $90,000 $260,339.54
Construction Management $180,000 $312,776.50
Construction of Offsite Improvements $857,000 $968,175.73 Total Project Estimate $1,127,000 $1,541,291.77

Staff is therefore requesting an increase of the City's share of the Reimbursement Agreement with CVUSD by $414,291.77 for a revised amount of $1,541,291.77 which includes a 10 - percent contingency for the construction costs.

Attachments: Reimbursement Agreement (reference only)
Comprehensive Offsite Street Improvement Scope Exhibit

12.19 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 644

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CITY OF CHINO

AND THE CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
FOR CERTAIN CHINO HIGH SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT .:) FF- SITE

STREET, PEDESTRIAN, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
This Agreement (" AGREEMENT") is made and entered as of this Z. ( 4T day of 2021, by and between the CITY OF CHINO, a California general law city, hereinafter referred to as " CITY," and the CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public school district, hereinafter referred to as " DISTRICT." The DISTRICT and CITY may be referred to herein individually as " party," or collectively as " pantie:_'

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to complete off- site street, pedestrian. and utility improvements (" CITY PROJECT") adjacent to the DISTRICT' s Chino High School. located at or near 5472 Park Place, Chino, California 91710, on real property identified as San Bernardino County Assessor Parcel Nos. 1015- 401- 01- 0000, 1015- 581- 01- 0000, 1015- 59 ') 1- 0000, and 1015- 591- 02- 0000 (" CHINO HIGH SCHOOL"); and
WHEREAS, the CITY PROJECT more specifically includes, but may nor necessarily be limited to, the construction or installation of directional accessiblecurb ramps. pedestriancrossing accessat driveways, high visibility cross walks, curb, gutter, and sidewalk replacement, street lights, pavement rehabilitation, and signing and striping, as more specif icall} Highlighted in Exhibit 1, which is attachedhereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is in the processof performing its construction of the Chino High School Reconstruction Project(" DISTRICT PROJECT") at CHINO HIGH SCHOOL, which will include the reconstruction of the academiccore of the Chino High School campus, including, but not necessarily limited to, the phaseddemolition of old and construction of ne‘v nuildings and sports facilities, aswell as the addition of a new main campusentry and drop-off/ nick-up zone on the north side of the campus along Jefferson Avenue; and WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it would be more efficient for me DISTRICT, rather than the CITY, to carry out the design and construction of the CITY PROJECT due to the nature of that project as compared to comparable work that will be performed for Me DISTRICT PROJECT; and

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 645

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 646

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 647

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 648

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 649

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 650

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 651

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 652

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 653
ign Envelope ID: F70D82EC- BE17- 430A- A3F2 A47D1e3C330C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to the AGREEMEN have executed this , z,:_:

HE.tEEIVIENT
on the date hereinabove written.

CITY OF CHINO
By_ Dated
Ma B Ian v
City M nage
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DocuSigned by!
By_ Dated 1/6/ 2021

CITY OF CHINO

CHIN() VALLEY UNIFI D SCHOOL DESTRIC
By Dated / 7-

2./ 07
Gregory J. achura
Assistant perintendent
Facilities, Planning. and Operations
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dated If7-
17---
L' 1. Counsel
i) 225 0006, 1-387& 48 I

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 654

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 655

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 656

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 657

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 658

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 659

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 660

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 661

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 662

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 663

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 664

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 665

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 666

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 667

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 668

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 669

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 670

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 671

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 672

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 673

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 674

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 675

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 676

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 677

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 678

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 679

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 680

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 681

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 682

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 683

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 684

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 685

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 686

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 687

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 688

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 689

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 690

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 691

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 692

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 693

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 694

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 695

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 696

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 697

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 698

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 699

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 700

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 701

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 702

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 703

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 704

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 705

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 706

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 707

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 708

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 709

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 710

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 711

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 712

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 713

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 714

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 715

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 716

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 717

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 718

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 719

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 720

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 721

12.19.a
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 722

12.19.b
Amendment to Increase - Reimbursement Agreement for
Packet Pg. 723
Revenue: Expenditure:

Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY OF CHINO

LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
CITY LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS.

RECOMMENDATION
Consider, discuss, and if deemed appropriate, approve the proposed City positions on pending legislation and authorize that letters be sent promoting these official stances.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:

The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Public Service Excellence through Internal and External Partnerships

13.20 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Packet Pg. 724
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: CITY LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
On February 22, 2023 and March 28, 2023, the Legislative Policy Committee (“LPC”) reviewed legislation consequential to the City of Chino in collaboration with City staff, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son (“Gonsalves”), as well as staff members from State Senator Rubio’s Office and Assembly Member Rodriguez’ Office. In general, those pieces of legislation focused on matters relating to public safety, emergency services, and housing.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
After reviewing these pieces of legislation, the LPC recommends the following positions. Draft letters reflecting the proposed stances are attached as Exhibit A. Should the City C ouncil approve these positions, staff will move forward distributing letters and setting up meetings to promote the City’s position on these pieces of legislation.

Bill
Number
Title Proposed
Position
Author
SB 316 Shoplifting: Increased Penalties
for prior crimes
Support State Senators Niello and
Ochoa Bogh
SB 4 Planning and zoning: housing
development: higher education
institutions and religious
institutions
Oppose State Senator Wiener
SB 423 Land use: streamlined housing
approvals: multifamily housing
developments:

Oppose State Senator Wiener
AB 257 Encampments: penalties Support if
amended
Assembly Member Hoover
AB 367 Controlled Substances:

Enhancements
Support Assembly Member
Maienschein
AB 797 Local Government: Police
Boards
Oppose Assembly Member Weber
SB 31 Encampments: Sensitive
Areas: Penalties
Support if
amended
State Senator Jones
SB 55 Vehicles: Catalytic Converters Support State Senators Umberg and Portantino
AB 1708 Theft Support Assembly Member
Muratsuchi
SB 536 Surplus State Real Property:

Heman G. Stark Youth
Correctional Facility
Support State Senator Rubio
SB 20 Joint Powers Agreements:

Regional Housing Trust
Support State Senator Rubio

13.20 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Packet Pg. 725
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: CITY LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS
PAGE 3
SB 459 Domestic Violence: Restraining
Orders
Support State Senator Rubio
SB 690 Domestic Violence Support State Senator Rubio
AB 40 Emergency Medical Services Support Assembly Member Rodriguez
AB 55 Emergency Medical Services Support Assembly Member Rodriguez
AB 97 Firearms: Unserialized
Firearms
Support
(acknowledge
disappointment
with
amendment)
Assembly Member
Rodriguez
AB 250 State Route 83: Reduction Support Assembly Member Rodriguez
AB 474 State Threat Assessment
Center: Transnational Criminal
Organizations
Support Assembly Member
Rodriguez
AB 1505 Seismic Retrofitting: Soft Story
Multifamily Housing
Support Assembly Member
Rodriguez
AB 1303 California Emergency Services
Act: Disaster Preparedness
Support Assembly Member
Rodriguez
Attachment: Exhibit A: Proposed Letters
Exhibit B: Tracked Bills

13.20 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Packet Pg. 726
April 4, 2023
California State Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
1021 O Street, Room 7220
Sacramento, CA 95814
California State Senator Roger Niello
1021 O Street, Room 7110
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Support of Senate Bill (“SB”) 316.

To the Honorable California Assembly Member Gil Alanis:

The City of Chino (“City”) takes prides in being home to one of the best police agencies in the State of California. The Chino Police Department is undeniably one of the most professional and proactive local police departments and the Chino City Council will continue to not only support the Chino Police Department, but other law enforcement agencies as well.

Previous legislation like AB 109 allowed potentially dangerous individuals to be released from prison earlier than what existing law allowed. Additionally, state ballot measures have compounded the problem by either downgrading felonies to misdemeanors (Proposition 47) or enabling early -release of individuals who committed “non-violent” crimes (Proposition 57). The result has been an increase of unrehabilitated criminals coming into our communities. From 2021 to 2022, Chino had a 20% and 16% increase in burglaries and theft, respectively. Moreover, throughout the past year, the Chino Police Department has arrested over 500 people multiple times with some individuals being arrested close to a dozen times.

With repeat offenders continuously coming back into our community, it has encumbered Chino Police Department resources, and like many c ommunities, has certainly impacted the quality of life of Chino residents. Your proposed bill will provide local law enforcement agencies the support needed to protect communities and build accountability back into the criminal justice system.

It is for these reasons that the City of Chino supports Senate Bill 316 to give voters the opportunity to reevaluate the impacts of previous state ballot measures like Proposition 47. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.a
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 727 Exhibit A
April 4, 2023
California State Senator Scott Weiner
1021 O Street, STE 8620
Sacramento, CA 95814-4900
Re: Opposition to Senate Bills (“SB”) 4 and 423.

To the Honorable California State Senator Scott Weiner:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter of opposition to Senate Bill 4 and Senate Bill 423. Although well intended to address the housing crisis, the City’s overall concern is that these bills apply a “one size fits all” approach and assumes the City is not responding to the housing crisis in a responsible manner. In contrary to this perspective, the City is very aware that affordable housing is a preeminent statewide issue, and the City is committed to doing its fair share. In fact, through the next decade, the City will be taking all concerted efforts to build 4,600 housing units affordable to low- and moderate-income families. Moreover, as the City moves to update its General Plan, one key addition will be an inclusionary housing ordinance, which will create a reliable source of new affordable housing and will provide regulatory tools necessary to help meet the goals and requirements of the City’s Housing Element.

As currently written, both pieces of legislation intend to streamline development to the detriment of local oversight and environmental review. It is the City’s position that these bills favor expediency over substance. The City is charged to work in favor of the public’s interest. This means that the City will work to develop affordable housing within the purview of sound environmental, safety, and zoning regulations.

As previously mentioned, the City is making si gnificant efforts to build affordable housing, and t he City does not agree with the notion that it should neglect its local policy and safeguards to further streamline development. As you can certainly appreciate, there is more nuance and balance to local governance that recognizes local leaders in collaboration with their constituents are best suited to meet challenges facing our communities.

Therefore, in consideration of the above, the City respectfully opposes SB 4 and 423. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Administration Department at (909) 334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.b
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 728 April 4, 2023
California Assembly Member Reginald Jones-Sawyer
Chair of the Assembly Public Safety Committee
1020 N Street, Room 111
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Qualified Support of Assembly Bill (“AB”) 257.

To the Honorable Chairperson Reginald Jones-Sawyer:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter in support of AB 257 with the qualification that the bill’s original language be restored to include the actions of “sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property…”. With the recent amendments, this bill has been limited in scope to prohibit the act of “camping” as defined. The definition of camping pursuant to the proposed bill appears to limit the City’s ability to take remedial action when a person is occupying a space within 500 feet of sensitive areas (i.e., daycares, schools, youth centers, etc.). Please understand this is not to suggest that the City is attempting to criminalize homelessness.

The City recognizes that addressing homelessness requires a compassionate response that balances the need to help those who are unsheltered while also ensuring the quality of life for others. The City believes these can be mutually reinforcing principles. This proposed legislation could potentially provide the Chino Police Department the tools necessary to humanely encourage individuals experiencing homelessness to accept assistance while ensuring the safety of all our community members. However, as currently amended, the bill will not adequately support the City’s efforts to connect unsheltered individuals with resources while safeguarding the Chino community.

The City requests that you please restore the bill’s original language, and City thanks you for your consideration on this matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,
cc: California Assembly Member Josh Hoover

13.20.c
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 729

April 4, 2023

California State Assembly Member Brian Maienschein
12396 World Trade Drive, Suite 118
San Diego, CA 92128

Re: Support of Assembly Bill (“AB”) 367.

To the Honorable California Assembly Member Brian Maienschein:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter of support for AB 367. As felt by many communities across the State of California, drug overdoses are certainly on the rise and have had a devastating impact on families and the cities they reside . In Chino, after seeing significant increases in overdose calls, it was ultimately determined that the lifesaving emergency pharmaceutical known as a NARCAN kit would need to be made available to every Chino Police Officer so they may save the lives of those experiencing an overdose. On top of these emergency intervention s, the Chino Police Department also has highly trained personnel dedicated to supporting those struggling with mental health and substance abuse issues. They are specifically trained to offer resources and assistance to prevent a major crisis. They collaborate with hospitals and programs that treat mental health and substance abuse problems.

Additionally, the Chino Police Department’s Quality of Life Team is a full-time assignment comprised of a Police Sergeant, a Corporal, and three Officers. This team handles quality of life concerns such as homelessness, panhandling, and blight. A vast majority of the homeless population they service have either a drug addiction, mental health issue or a combination of both. The Quality-of-Life Team collaborates with the City of Chino Community Services Department and San Bernardino County Behavioral Health to develop treatment plans to obtain sobriety as well as housing assistance.

With all the efforts made locally by the City of Chino to combat this epidemic and curb overdoses, the City is appreciative of your efforts to shift accountability back to the sellers of harmful substances. Although the City would have like to see the original language of “contr olled substance” remain, the City is in support AB 367. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at (909) 334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.d
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 730
April 4, 2023
California Assembly Member Dr. Akilah Weber
4700 Spring Street, STE. 131
La Mesa, CA 91941
Re: Opposition to Assembly Bill (“AB”) 797.

To the Honorable California Assembly Member Dr. Akilah Weber:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter of opposition to AB 797. The Chino Police Department has taken significant efforts to work collaboratively with the Chino community. The Chino Police Department believes it cannot effectively police and protect Chino residents with out the trust and understanding of the community. To that end, the Chino Police Department commits time and resources to build valuable programs that support collaborative, community policing. Some of thes e events include an annual Community Open House at the Chino Police Department, a Community Academy where Chino residents can learn about the Chino Police Department, and the Summer Youth Academy where attendees participate in activities, presentations, demonstrations, and field trips highlighting the various aspects of the law enforcement profession.

Beyond public outreach programs, the Chino Police Department takes pride in holding its personnel to the highest standards of professionalism and integrity. In the rare moments where the Chino Police Department has been made aware of its employees falling below this standard, the response has been swift, transparent, and decisive. Although the bill intends to increase transparency, it does not consider the trus t that may already exist between a community and its police department. Rather, it appears to unfortunately be a wholesale reaction to the decisions other police departments that has no bearing on the Chino Police Department and its commitment to the Chino community.

It is for these reasons that the City of Chino opposes AB 797. Should you have any questions, please feel to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at (909) 334-3338 Sincerely,

13.20.e
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 731 April 4, 2023
California State Senator Aisha Wahab
Chair of the Senate Public Safety Committee
1020 N Street, Room 545
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Qualified Support of Senate Bill (“SB”) 31.

To the Honorable Chairperson Aisha Wahab:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter in support of SB 31 with one qualification relating to the issue of noticing and timing. The City recognizes the inherent challenges with helping those experiencing chronic homelessness. There is no single cause or solution, and in many cases, those experiencing homelessness have found themselves in these disheartening circumstances resulting from a combination of financial hardship, severe substance abuse/addiction, and/or struggles with their mental health – this is not mention other potential underlying factors as well.

The City recognizes that addressing homelessness requires a compassionate response that balances the need to help those who are unsheltered while also ensuring the quality of life for others. The City believes these can be mutually reinforcing principles. This proposed legislation will provide the Chino Police Department and Code Enforcement Division the tools necessary to remove encampments safely and humanely.

However, the City objects to the current language requiring 72 hours’ notice before any remedial action can be taken. Currently, the City can address these matters more efficiently, providing the City’s Quality of Life Team and the City’s Homeless Outreach Coordinator the opportunity to connect these individuals with resources necessary to provide sustainable support and services. The City will support this legislation if the noticing requirement is lessened to 24 hours.

The City thanks you for your efforts to provide the legal recourse necessary to protect the health and safety of our community, and we ask that you please consider the aforementioned amendment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,
cc: California State Senator Brian Jones

13.20.f
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 732 April 4, 2023
California State Senator Tom Umberg
1021 O Street, STE. 6530
Sacramento, CA 95814
California State Senator Anthony J. Portantino
1021 O Street, Suite 7630
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Support of Senate Bill (“SB”) 55.

To the Honorable California State Senator Tom Umberg and California State Senator Anthony J.

Portantino:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully writes to support SB 55. The City has seen the number and frequency of catalytic converter thefts rise dramati cally over the past few years. In response, the Chino Police Department has worked to adopt a local ordinance making it unlawful to possess a catalytic converter that is not attached to a vehicle without valid documentation or proof of lawful possession.

Your proposed bill will support the City’s efforts to curb catalytic converter thefts by, among others, prohibiting a dealer or retailer from selling a new or used motor vehicle equipped with a catalytic converter unless is has been permanently marked. Th e issue of catalytic converter thefts has certainly been an important matter to the Chino community and the Chino Police Department , and any regulatory tool to support these efforts will be welcomed by the Chino community.

Your proposed bill supports the City’s ongoing efforts to curtail these thefts, and for those reasons, the City is in support of SB 55. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.g
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 733 April 4, 2023
California State Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi
1021 O Street, STE. 5610
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Support of Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1708.

To the Honorable California Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi:

The City of Chino (“City”) writes to support AB 1708. As you can assuredly attest, p revious legislation like AB 109 allowed potentially dangerous individuals to be released from prison earlier than what existing law allowed. Additionally, state ballot measures have compounded the problem by either downgrading felonies to misdemeanors (Proposition 47) or enabling early -release of individuals who committed “non - violent” crimes (Proposition 57). The result has been an increase of unrehabilitated criminals c oming into our communities. From 2021 to 2022, Chino had a 20% and 16% increase in burglaries and theft, respectively. Moreover, throughout the past year, the Chino Police Department has arrested over 500 people multiple times with some individuals being arrested close to a dozen times.

AB 1708 intends to provide California voters the opportunity to undo Proposition 47 provisions that seemingly removed accountability in the criminal justice system. As demonstrated above, the City has experienced repeat offenders coming back into our community, encumber ing Chino Police Department resources, and impacting the quality of life of Chino residents. Your proposed bill will enable the State of California to correct these failed reform attempts, which in turn, will support local communities and law enforcement agencies.

The City applauds you for your efforts, and it is for these reasons that the City of Chino supports AB 1708.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the City of Chino Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.h
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 734 April 4, 2023
California State Senator Susan Rubio
100 S. Vincent Avenue, STE. 401
West Covina, CA 91790
California Assembly Member Freddie Rodriguez
13160 7th Street
Chino, CA 91710
Re: Proposed Housing and Development Legislation – California Senate Bills (“SB”) 4, 20, and 423.

To the Honorable California State Senator Susan Rubio and the Honorable Assembly Member Freddie Rodriguez:

The City of Chino (“City”) respectfully submits this letter detailing our support or opposition to a series of Senate Bills that have been introduced for the 2023-2024 Legislative Session. The City certainly recognizes that affordable housing is a preeminent statewide issue, and the City is committed to doing its fair share. In fact, through the next decade, the City will be taking all concerted efforts to build 4,600 housing units affordable to low and moderate income families. Moreover, as the City moves to update its General Plan, one key addition will be an inclusionary housing ordinance, which will create a reliable source of new affordable housing,, and will provide regulatory tools necessary to help meet the goals and requirements of the City’s Housing Element.

The City’s overall concern is that many of these bills apply a “one size fits all” approach. Often, specified findings are made that the proposed changes(s) in law address matters of statewide concern. This seems to provide authorization to make unilateral amendments in local land development procedures regardle ss of community composition or location. As representatives of diverse communities across the greater Los Angeles area, coupled with your respective backgrounds in local government as City Council Members, the City is fully aware you recognize that while o ne policy may work in a given community, it does not mean it will be successful in another city. The City believes in the same philosophy and is hopeful our community can retain its self-determination to advance the logical development of our community.

The City does, however, appreciate State Senator Rubio’s proposed bill SB 20. While the other pieces of legislation tend to focus on wholesale changes, State Senator Rubio’s bill focuses on giving cities tools necessary to meet affordable housing demands. It is not a forced program. Rather, it takes a structure that has proven to be successful in the San Gabriel Valley and offers cities the chance to replicate that process

13.20.i
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 735 while retaining their own voice. It recognizes that local leaders in collaboration with their constituents are best suited to meet the challenges facing our communities.

Therefore, in consideration of the above, the City is in support of SB 20, but respectfully requests that you vote “NO” on SB 4 and SB 423.

Sincerely,

13.20.i
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 736 April 4, 2023
California State Senator Susan Rubio
100 S. Vincent Avenue, STE. 401
West Covina, CA 91790
California Assembly Member Freddie Rodriguez
13160 7th Street
Chino, CA 91710
Re: Proposed Public Safety Legislation – California Assembly Bills (“AB”) 40, 55, 97, 474, 1505, 1303, 316, 257, 367, 797, 1708 and California Senate Bills (“SB”) 31, 55, 459, and 690.

To the Honorable California State Senator Susan Rubio and the Honorable Assembly Member Freddie Rodriguez:

The City of Chino (“City”) takes prides in being home to one of the best police agencies in the State of California. The Chino Police Department is undeniably one of the most professional and proactive local police departments and the Chino City Council will continue to not only support the Chino Police Department, but other law enforcement agencies as well.

While the City was not fortunate enough to have your representation at the time, previous legislation like AB 109 allowed potentially dangerous individuals to be released from prison earlier than what existing law allowed. Additionally, state ballot measures have compounded the problem by either downgrading felonies to misdemeanors (Proposition 47) or enabling early- release of individuals who committed “non - violent” crimes (Proposition 57). The result has been an increase of unrehabilitated criminals coming into our communities. From 2021 to 2022, Chino had a 20% and 16% increase in burglaries and theft, respectively. Moreover, throughout the past year, the Chino Police Department has arrested over 500 people multiple times with some individuals being arrested close to a dozen times.

As reflected above, in recent years, there has been a tendency to take a passive approach to crime. This has directly impacted the Chino Community and has encumbered the Chino Police Department’s resources. As conveyed in the City’s February 7 letter, the Chino Community would like to partner with your respective offices to support legislation that gives the Chino Police Department (and other law enforcement agencies), the tools necessary to perform their jobs and keep them safe.

However, first the City would like to reiterate its appreciation of your representation. The bills you have introduced are pragmatic and directly benefit public safety, emergency preparedness, and services (AB 474, AB 1505, and AB 1303), they focus on increasing emergency service access and efficiency (AB 40 and AB

13.20.j
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 737

55), and they seek to protect victim’s rights (SB 459 and SB 690). While the City is disappointed that AB 97 has been amended in committee to remove provisions that would ma ke possession of an unserialized firearm punishable as a felony, the City is nevertheless supportive of these pieces of legislation and appreciates your respective efforts to make the Chino Community safer. With regard to the other pieces of legislation, the City requests that you please consider the following positions:

Bill
Number
Title Position and General Comments
SB 316 Shoplifting:

Increased
Penalties for
Prior Crimes
Support – Although a statewide election is required, this bill will provide the tools necessary for the Chino Police Department to end the cycle of criminals being arrested and released into the Chino Community.

AB 257 Encampments:

Penalties
Support if amended - The City takes considered efforts to support those experiencing homelessness; however, regulatory tools need to be in place to ensure the quality of life for others as well. As amended, this bill only narrowly describes what can be prohibited (i.e., camping). The City has requested that the bill’s original language be restored.

AB 367 Controlled
Substances:

Enhancements
Support – This bill places more accountability on those who sell fentanyl to individuals.

AB 797 Local
Government:

Police Boards
Oppose – The Chino City Council, Chino Community, and Chino Police Department have always worked collaboratively. This bill applies a “one size fits all” approach that is not helpful or useful to Chino residents.

SB 31 Encampments:

Sensitive
Areas:

Penalties
Support if amended – This bill could provide the regulatory tools necessary to ensure the quality of life for others while connecting the unsheltered with services . However, the City believes that the noticing timeframe of 72 hours is excessive . The City has requested that this be revised to 24 hours.

SB 55 Vehicles:

Catalytic
Converters
Support – This bill will support the Chino Police Department’s ongoing efforts to curb the catalytic converter thefts experienced in the Chino Community.

AB
1708
Theft Support – Like SB 316, pending approval through a statewide election, will bring accountability back into the criminal justice system and will help end the cycle of criminals being arrested and released into the Chino Community.

Once again, on behalf of the Chino Community, thank you for your support and representation. The City is excited to work with your respective offices on these important matters. The City also appreciates that you both bring a unique perspective with your distinguished careers in education and emergency services as well as both serving as City Council Members. Should your offices have any questions, please feel free to contact the Administration Department at 909-334-3338.

Sincerely,

13.20.j
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 738
Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

Assembly
Bill (AB) |
Senate
Bill (SB)
Number
Author Title and Proposed Change to Law Committee Location AB 40 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez
Emergency medical services:

Existing law, the Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act, creates the Eme rgency Medical Services Authority, which is responsible for the coordination of various state activities concerning emergency medical services. Among other duties, existing law requires the authority to develop planning and implementation guidelines for EMS systems, provide technical assistance to existing agencies, counties, and cities for the purpose of developing the components of EMS systems, and receive plans for the implementation of EMS and trauma care systems from local EMS agencies. Existing law makes a violation of the act or regulatio ns adopted pursuant to the act punishable as a misdemeanor.

This bill would require the auth ority to develop an electronic signature for use between the emergency department medical personnel at a receiving facility and the transporting emergency medical personnel that captures the points in time when the hospital receiv es notification of ambulance arrival and when transfer of care is executed for documentation of ambulance patient offload time, as defined. The bill would require the authority to develop a statewide standard of 20 minutes, 90% of the time, for ambulance patient offload time. The b ill would also require the authority to develop an audit tool to improve data accuracy regarding transfer of care, as specified, and to provide technical assistance and funding as needed, subject to an appropriation, for small rural hospitals and volunteer EMS providers to implement these provisions. The bill would require the authority to adopt emergency regulations to implement these provisions on or before March 1, 2024.

The bill would require the authority, on or before March 1, 2024, to establish a working group of various stakeholders to review, update, and publish a toolkit to reduce patient offload delays in the emergency department.

The bill would require a general acute care hospital with an emergency department to develop, in consultation with its emergency department staff, an ambulance patient offload time reduction protocol by June 1, 2024, that addresses specified factors, including, among other things, mechanisms to improve hospital operations to reduce ambulance patient offload time. The bill would require the hospital to file its protocol with the authority and to report annually any revisions to its protocol. The bill would require the authority, on or after March 1, 2024, to monitor monthly ambulance patient offload time data for each facility. The bill would require the authority to, among other things, report ambulance patient offload time exceedance to the relevant local EMS agency and the Commission on Emergency Medical Services if, on or after July 1, 2024, the general acute care hospital with an emergency department has an ambulance patient offload time that exceeds the statewide standard of 20 minutes, 90% of the time.

The bill would additionally require local EMS agencies to create, in collaboration with local hospitals, a joint plan to respond to surges in demand for medical services and to submit the joint plans to the authority on or before March 1, 2024.

Because the bill would create new requirements within the act, thereby expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program.

Existing law, the Warren-911-Emergency Assistance Act, requires each local public agency within its respective jurisdiction to establish a basic system that automatically connects a person dialing 911 to an established public safety answering point through normal telephone service facilities.

Assembly Emergency
Management

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 739 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

This bill would require the Emergency Services Medical Authority, on or before March 1, 2024, to develop a public education campaign related to the use of the 911 service and other tools for access to care.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

AB 55 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez
Emergency Medical Services:
(1) Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including emergency medical transportation services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires, with exceptions, that the reimbursement to emergency medical transport providers for emergency medical transports, as defined, be increased by application of an add-on to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule. Existing law requires that the add-on increase be calculated on or before June 15, 2018, and remain the same for later state fiscal years, to the extent the department determines federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized. Under existing law, the resulting fee-for-service payment schedule amounts are equal to the sum of the Medi- Cal fee-for-service payment schedule amount for the 2015–16 state fiscal year and the add-on increase.

This bill would set the Medi-Cal fee-for-service reimbursement rate for emergency medical transports at $350 per transport. Under the bill, the resulting fee-for-service payment schedule amounts would instead be equal to the sum of the Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule amount, based on the $350 rate, and the add-on increase. Under existing law, the increased payments under the add-on provisions are funded solely from a quality assurance fee (QAF), which emergency medical transport providers are required to pay based on a specified formula, and from federal reimbursement and any other related federal funds.

This bill would specify that the $350 reimbursement rate would not affect the calculation of the QAF rate, and that the calculation of the QAF rate would be based on the methodology and reimbursement rate in effect as of January 1, 2023.

Existing law authorizes the Director of Health Care Services to modify or make adjustments to any methodology or fee amount under these provisions to the extent necessary to meet federal requirements or to obtain federal approval.

If a modification or adjustment is needed to meet federal requirements or to obtain federal approval, this bill would require the director to recalculate and reduce the add-on amount as necessary, and would prohibit the director from reducing the $350 reimbursement rate. (2) Existing law, the Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act (act), establishes the Emergency Medical Services Authority, which is responsible for the coordination of various state activities concerning emergency medical services (EMS). The act authorizes a county to develop an EMS program by designating a local EMS agency. The act requires the medical director of a local EMS agency to issue a certificate to, or recertify, an individual as an Emergency Medical Technician-I (EMT-I) or Emergency Medical Technician-II (EMT-II), upon proof that the individual has met specified training and other requirements. The act sets forth various provisions relating to public or private EMS providers that employ an EMT-I, EMT-II, or other EMS personnel. Existing law makes a violation of the act a misdemeanor.

This bill would, for the compensation of an EMT-I or EMT-II employed by an EMS provider, as defined, require the EMS provider to set the compensation in an amount that is no lower than the prevailing wage for an EMT-I or EMT-II, respectively, within the corresponding EMS area, defined as the geographical area within the jurisdiction of the designated local EMS agency. The bill would define “prevailing wage” as Assembly Committee
on Health

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 740 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve. the basic hourly rate of wages and benefits paid to a majority of EMT-I, or EMT-II, as applicable, employed within an EMS area of a local EMS agency.

The bill would require each local EMS agency to determine the prevailing wage of an EMT-I or EMT-II within the agency’s EMS area, and to annually update its calculation, pursuant to guidance on the methodology and formula that the authority would be required to develop for these purposes.

By creating new duties for public EMS providers, and by expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

AB 97 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez
Firearms: unserialized firearms:

Existing law requires a person that is manufacturing a firearm or assembling a firearm from unserialized components, to apply to the Department of Justice for a unique mark of identification and to affix that mark to the firearm, as specified. Existing law prohibits a person, corporation, or firm from knowingly manufacturing or assembling, or to knowingly cause, allow, facilitate, aid, or abet the manufacture or assembling of, a firearm that is not imprinted with a valid state or federal serial number or mark of identification. Under existing law, a person who knowingly possesses a firearm that does not have a valid state or federal serial number or mark of identification is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would, until January 1, 2033, require the Department of Justice to collect and report specified information, including, among other things, the number of arrests pursuant to the provisions mentioned above. The bill would require the department to issue a report to the Legislature, as specified, on or before January 1, 2025, and annually thereafter, that includes the data collected.

Existing federal law requires a commercially produced firearm to be etched or otherwise inscribed by the manufacturer with a unique serial number. Existing state law prohibits the alteration, removal, or obliteration of that serial number. A violation of this prohibition is punishable as a felony. Existing law also prohibits the transfer or possession of a firearm with a serial number that has been altered, removed, or obliterated. A violation of this prohibition is punishable as a misdemeanor.

Existing law requires a person, other than a licensed manufacturer, who assembles or manufactures a firearm, or any person who possesses an unserialized firearm, to obtain a unique serial number from the Department of Justice and to inscribe that serial number on the firearm, as specified. A violation of this requirement is punishable as a misdemeanor.

This bill would make the possession of an unserialized firearm or possession of a firearm with an altered, removed, or obliterated serial number punishable as a felony. By increasing the punishment for these crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Assembly
Appropriations
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 741 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

AB 250 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez
State Route 83: reduction:

Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system and establishes a process for adoption of a highway on an authorized route by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish to local agencies state highway segments that have been deleted from the state highway system by legislative enactment or have been superseded by relocation, and in certain other cases. Existing law designates State Route 83 from Route 71 to Route 10 near the City of Upland. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish to the City of Ontario all or a portion of State Route 83 within the city’s jurisdiction and prescribes conditions that apply upon relinquishment.

This bill would authorize the commission to additionally relinquish to the City of Chino all or a portion of State Route 83 within the city’s jurisdiction and prescribe conditions that apply upon relinquishment.

Assembly
Appropriations
Committee
AB 474 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez,
(Coauthor:

Assembly
Member
Waldron)
State Threat Assessment Center: transnational criminal organizations:

Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, creates, within the office of the Governor, the Office of Emergency Services, which is responsible for addressing natural, technological, or human-caused disasters and emergencies, including responsibility for activities necessary to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of emergencies and disasters to people and property.

This bill would find and declare that the State Threat Assessment Center (STAC) serves as California’s information-sharing clearinghouse of strategic threat analysis and situational awareness reporting for statewide leadership and the public safety community, as specified, and that the STAC is California’s state primary fusion center, as designated by the Governor, and is operated by the Department of the California Highway Patrol, the Office of Emergency Services, and the Department of Justice. The bill would make other findings and declarations related to drug trafficking and transnational criminal organizations. The bill would require the STAC and the Office of Emergency Services to prioritize, to the greatest extent possible, cooperation with state and local efforts to illuminate, disrupt, degrade, and dismantle criminal networks trafficking opioid drugs that pose a threat to California. The bill would require the STAC to support state and local interagency task forces to combat illegal opioid trafficking in California, as specified, including preparing and disseminating intelligence products for public safety entities.

Assembly Public
Safety Committee
AB 1505 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez,
(Coauthors:

Assembly
Members Juan
Carrillo, Holden,
Schiavo, and
Wood)
Seismic retrofitting: soft story multifamily housing:

Existing law establishes the California Earthquake Authority, administered under the authority of the Insurance Commissioner and governed by a 3-member board, to transact insurance in this state as necessary to sell policies of basic residential earthquake insurance. Under existing law, the California Residential Mitigation Program, also known as the CRMP, is a joint powers authority created in 2012 by agreement between the California Earthquake Authority and the Office of Emergency Services. Existing law establishes the Seismic Retrofitting Program for Soft Story Multifamily Housing for the purposes of providing financial assistance to owners of soft story multifamily housing for seismic retrofitting to protect individuals living in multifamily housing that have been determined to be at risk of collapse in earthquakes, as specified. Existing law also establishes the Seismic Retrofitting Program for Soft Story Multifamily Housing Fund, and its subsidiary account, the Seismic Retrofitting Account, within the State Treasury. Existing law provides that the Legislature will appropriate $250,000,000 from the General Fund in the 2023–24 Budget Act to the Seismic Retrofitting Program for Soft Story Multifamily Housing Fund for the purposes of carrying out the program. Existing law requires the CRMP to develop and administer the program, as specified. Existing law makes these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2042, and repeals them as of January 1, 2043. This bill would, instead, appropriate $250,000,000 from the General Fund to the CRMP for the purpose of implementing the Seismic Retrofitting Program for Soft Story Multifamily Housing. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Assembly Emergency
Management
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 742 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

AB 1303 Assembly
Member
Rodriguez
California Emergency Services Act: disaster preparedness:

Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, establishes the Office of Emergency Services, which is responsible for the state’s emergency and disaster response services for natural, technological, or human-induced disasters and emergencies, including responsibility for activities necessary to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of emergencies and disasters on people and property.

Under existing law, the Office of Emergency Services, in coordination with all interested state agencies with designated response roles in the state emergency plan and interested local emergency management agencies, is required to jointly establish by regulation a standardized emergency management system for use by all emergency response agencies.

This bill would require the California State Warning Center, within the Office of Emergency Services, to develop a process for private-sector fuel transporters to voluntarily share information, as specified, for the purpose of providing fuel to local and state public-safety agencies actively involved in responding to or recovering from a disaster.

Assembly Emergency
Management
Committee
SB 316 State Senators
Niello and
Ochoa Bogh,
(Coauthors:

Senators Jones,
Nguyen,
Seyarto, and
Wilk)
Shoplifting: increased penalties for prior crimes:

Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors in the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, makes the theft of property that does not exceed $950 in value petty theft and makes that crime punishable as a misdemeanor, with certain exceptions. The initiative statute defines shoplifting as entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny while that establishment is open during regular hours, where the value of the property that is taken or intended to be taken does not exceed $950. The initiative statute requires that shoplifting be punished as a misdemeanor. Existing law, as amended by Proposition 47, provides that a registered sex offender or a person with a prior conviction for certain serious or violent felonies, such as a sexually violent offense, who commits petty theft is subject to imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year or in the state prison for 16 months or 2 or 3 years. This bill would reinstate a provision of law that was repealed by Proposition 47 that provides that a person who has been convicted 3 or more times of petty theft, grand theft, or other specified crimes and who is subsequently convicted of petty theft is subject to imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in a county jail for 18 months or 2 or 3 years. The bill would also make this provision and the provision relating to a person with serious, violent, or sexual prior offenses applicable to a person whose prior or current conviction is for shoplifting. This bill would require the Secretary of State to place the provisions of the bill that amend the initiative statute on the ballot for the November 5, 2024, statewide general election.

Senate Public Safety
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 743 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

SB 4 State Senator
Wiener,
(Principal
coauthors:

Assembly
Members
McKinnor and
Wicks),
(Coauthors:

Senators
Becker, Cortese,
Eggman,
Gonzalez,
Menjivar, and
Skinner),
(Coauthors:

Assembly
Members
Alvarez,
Friedman,
Gabriel, Quirk-
Silva, and Ward)
Planning and zoning: housing development: higher education institutions and religious institutions:

The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long -term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing e lement. That law allows a development proponent to submit an application for a development that is subject to a specified streamlined, ministe rial approval process not subject to a conditional use permit, if the development satisfies certain objective planning standards.

Existing law, the Zenovich-Moscone-Chacon Housing and Home Finance Act, establishes the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee within the Department of Housing and Community Development. Existing law requires the committee to allocate state low-income housing tax credits in conformity with state and federal law that establishes a maximum rent that may be charged to a tenant for a project unit c onstructed using low-income housing tax credits.

This bill would require that a housing development project be a use by right upon the request of an applicant who submits an application for streamlined approval, on any land owned by an independent institution of higher education or religious institution on or before January 1, 2024, if the development satisfies specified criteria, including that the development is not adjoined to any site where more than one-third of the square footage on the site is dedicated to industrial use. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. Among oth er things, the bill would require that 100% of the units, exclusive of manager units, in a housing development project eligible for approval as a use by right under these provisions be affordable to lower income households, except that 20% of the units may be for moderate-income households, and 5% of the units may be for staff of the independent institution of higher education or the religions religious institution that owns the land, provided that the units affordable to lower income households are offered at affordable rent, as set in an amount consistent with the rent limits established by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, or affordable housing cost, as specified. The bill would authorize the develo pment to include ancillary uses on the ground floor of the development, as specified.

This bill would specify that a housing development project that is eligible for approval as a use by right under the bill is also eligible for a density bonus or other incentives or concessions, bonus, incentives, or concessions, or waivers or reductions of development and parking standards, except as specified. The bill would require a development subject to these provisions to provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit, unless a state law or local ordinance provides for a lower standard of parking, in which case the law or ordinance applies. The bill would prohibit a local government from imposing any parking requirement on a development subject to these provisions if the development is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, either a high -quality transit corridor or a major transit stop, as those terms are defined, or it is within one block of a car share vehicle.

This bill would require a local government that determines a pro posed development is in conflict with any objective planning standards, as specified, to provide the developer with written documentation explaining those conflicts under a specified timeframe. The bi ll would provide that the development shall be deemed to satisfy the required objective planning standards if the local government fails to provide the requisite documentation explaining any conflicts. The bill would authorize a local government to conduct a design review, as described, only if the design review focuses on compliance with the requisite criteria of a streamlined, ministerial review process. The bill would prohibit a local government from using a design review, as specified, from inhibiting, chilling, or precluding a streamlined, ministerial approval. The bill would require a local government to issue a subsequent permit for developments approved under the provisions of this act.

The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a m unicipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

Senate Governance
and Finance
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 744 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact r eport on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA does not apply to the ministerial approval of projects.

This bill, by requiring approval of certain development projects as a use by right, would expand the exemption for ministerial approval of projects under CEQA.

By adding to the duties of local planning officials with respect to approving certain development projects, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 745 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

SB 423 State Senator
Wiener,
(Principal
coauthor:

Assembly
Member Wicks),
(Coauthor:

Assembly
Member
Grayson)
Land use: streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments:

Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for a multifamily housing development that is subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process, as provided, and not subject to a conditional use permit, if the d evelopment satisfies specified objective planning standards, including, among others, that the development proponent has committed to record, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, a land use restriction or covenant providing that any lower or moderate-income housing units required, as specified, remain available at affordable housing costs, as defined, or rent to person s and families of lower or moderate -income for no less than specified periods of time. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2026.

This bill would authorize the Department of General Services to act in the place of a locality or local governm ent, at the discretion of that department, for purposes of the ministerial, streamlined review for development on property owned by or leased to the state. The bill would delete the January 1, 2026, repeal date, thereby making these provisions operative indefinitely.

This bill would modify the above-described objective planning standards, including by deleting the standard that prohibits a multifamily housing development from being subject to the streamlined, ministerial approval process if the development is located in a coastal zone, and by providing an alternative definition for “affordable housing costs” for a development that dedicates 100% of units, exclusive of a manager’s unit or units, to lower income households. The bill would, among other modifications, delete the objective planning standards requiring development proponents to pay at least the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and utilize a skilled and trained workforce and would instead require a development proponent to certify to the local government that certain wage and labor standards will be met, including a requirement that all construction workers be paid at least the general prevailing rate of wages, as specified. The bill would require the Labor Co mmissioner to enforce the obligation to pay prevailing wages. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would specify that the requirements to pay prevailing wages, use a workforce participating in an apprenticeship, or prov ide health care expenditures do not apply to a project that consists of 10 or fewer units and is not otherwise a public work.

This bill would define “objective planning standards” to exclude specified standards, including local building codes, fire codes, other codes requiring detailed technical specifications, and standards that are not reasonably ascertainable by the local government within specified time limits, as described.

Existing law requires a local government to approve a development if the local government determines the development is consistent with the objective planning standards. Existing law requires, if the local government determines a submitted development is i n conflict with any of the objective planning standards, the local government to provide the development proponent written documentation of the standard s the development conflicts with and an explanation for the conflict within certain timelines depending on the size of the development. Existing law, the Housing Accountability Act, prohibits a local agency from disapproving a housing development project, as described, unles s it makes specified written findings.

This bill would instead require approval if a local government’s planning director or any equivalent local government staff, including all relevant planning and permitting departments, equivalent position determines the development is consistent with the objective planning standards. The bill would make conforming changes. The bill would require all departments of the local government that are required to issue an approval of the development prior to the granting of an entitlement to also comply with the above-described streamlined approval requirements within specified time periods. The bill would prohibit a local government from requiring a development proponent to provide consultant studies, as described, or other studies requiring, prior to approving a development that meets the requirements of the above-described streamlining provisions, compliance with any standards necessary to receive a postentitlement permit or studies, information, or other materials that are Senate Governance
and Finance
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 746 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve. unnecessary to ascertain consistency do not pertain directly to determining whether the development is consistent with the objective planning standards. standards applicable to the development.

The bill would, for purposes of these provisions, establish that the total number of units in a development includes (1) all projects developed on a site, regardless of when those developments occur, and (2) all projects developed on sites adjacent to a site developed pursuant to these provisions if, after January 1, 2023, the adjacent site had been subdivided from the site developed pursuant to these provisions.

Existing law authorizes the local government’s planning commission or any equivalent board or commission responsible for review and approval of development projects, or as otherwise specified, to conduct any design review or public oversight of the development.

This bill would remove the above -described authorization to conduct public oversight of the development and would only authorize design review to be conducted by the local government’s planning commission or any equivalent board or commission responsible for design review.

By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide conc ern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

AB 257 Assembly
Member Hoover,
(Coauthors:

Assembly
Members Flora,
Gallagher, and
Sanchez)
Encampments: penalties:

Under existing law, a person who lodges in a public or private place without permission is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. Existing law also provides that a person who willfully and maliciously obstructs the free movement of any person on any street, sidewalk, or other public place is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would prohibit a person from sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property in any camping, as defined, in a street, sidewalk, or other public property within 500 feet of a school, daycare center , park, or library. playground, or youth center. The bill would make a violation of the prohibition an infraction or a misdemeanor. The bill would also make willfully resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer, public officer, or public employee in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty to enforce the prohibition a misdemeanor. By imposing criminal penalties for a violation of these provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law establishes procedures of diversion for specified defendants through which the court is authorized to grant pretrial diversion which, contingent on successful completion of specified terms and conditions imposed by the court, results in the dismissal of charges prior to adjudication. This bill would authorize a defendant who is being prosecuted for a misdemeanor for camping in a street, sidewalk, or other public property within 500 feet of a school, daycare center, playground, or youth center to be eligible for a diversion program, including, but not limited to, the Diversion of Individuals with Mental Disorders and the Court Initiated Misdemeanor Diversion, as specified.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Assembly
Appropriations
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 747 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

AB 367 Assembly
Member
Maienschein
Controlled substances: enhancements:

Existing law imposes an additional and consecutive 3- or 5-year term in the state prison on a person who personally inflicts great bodily injury on a person in the commission of a felony, as specified.

This bill bill, until January 1, 2029, would state that, for purposes of the this enhancement, a person inflicts great bodily injury when they sell, furnish, administer, or give away a controlled substance fentanyl or an analog of fentanyl and the person to whom the substance was sold, furnished, administered, or given suffers a significant or substantial physical injury from usi ng the substance. The bill would specify that this provision does not apply to juvenile offenders. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state -mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Assembly Public
Safety Committee
AB 797 Assembly
Member Weber
Local government: police review boards:

Existing law requires each department or agency in this state that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investi gate complaints by members of the public against the personnel of these departments or agencies, and to make a written description of this procedure available to the public. Existing law also requires each department or agency to keep and maintain records of complaints and investigations, as specified.

This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation requiring the governing body of each city and county to create and maintain independent, community-based boards to conduct independent investigations of citizen complaints against peace officers.

This bill would require the governing body of each city and county to, by January 15, 2025, create an independent community-based commission on law enforcement officer practices. The bill would authorize each commission to, among other things, conduct independent investigations of complaints against a police officer or sheriff alleging physical injury to a person, including injuries resulting in a person’s death. The bill would require the commission to prepare a report after an investigation and include the results of the investigation and a recommended course of action, if any, to be taken by the governing body regarding the law enforcement officer investigated by the commission. By increasing the duties of local officials, this would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Assembly Public
Safety Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 748 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

SB 31 State Senator
Jones, (Principal
coauthor:

Senator Grove),
(Coauthors:

Senators Dahle,
Nguyen, Niello,
Ochoa Bogh,
Seyarto, and
Wilk)
Encampments: sensitive areas: penalties:

Under existing law, a person who lodges in a public or private place without permission is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor.

Existing law also provides that a person who willfully and maliciously obstructs the free movement of any person on any street, sidewalk, or other public place is guilty of a misdemeanor.

Under existing law, a public nuisance is anything that is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property by an entire community, neighborhood, or considerable number of persons. Existing law provides various remedies against a public nuisance, including abatement by any public body or officer authorized by law.

This bill would prohibit a person from sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property upon any street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way within 1000 feet of a sensitive area, as defined. The bill would specify that a violation of this prohibition is a public nuisance that can be abated and prevented, as provided. The bill would also provide that a violation of the prohibition may be charged as a misdemeanor or an infraction, at the discretion of the prosecutor. The bill would prohibit a person from being found in violation of the bill’s provisions unless provided notice, at least 72 hours before commencement of any enforcement action, as provided. By imposing criminal penalties for a violation of these provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Senate Public Safety
Committee
SB 55 State Senator
Umberg
Vehicles: catalytic converters:

Existing law requires a core recycler that accepts, ships, or sells used catalytic converters to maintain specified information regarding the purchase and sale of the catalytic converters. Existing law prohibits a core recycler from providing payment for a catalytic converter unless, among other requirements, the payment is made by check, as specified.

This bill, in addition to payment by check, would allow for payment by credit card or any other form of traceable payment other than cash.

Existing law licenses and regulates motor vehicle dealers and retailers. Existing law prohibits a motor vehicle dealer or retailer from selling any motor vehicle that is not in compliance with the requirements enumerated in the Vehicle Code.

This bill would prohibit a dealer or retailer from selling a new or used motor vehicle equipped with a catalytic converter unless the catalytic converter has been engraved or etched permanently marked, as defined, with the vehicle identification number of the vehicle to which it is attached. A violation of this provision would be punishable as an infraction.

By creating a new infraction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason Senate Transportation
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 749 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

SB 536 State Senator
Rubio
Surplus state real property: Heman G. Stark Youth Correctional Facility:

Existing law requires a state agency to review all proprietary state lands under its jurisdiction, as specified, to determine what land is in excess of its needs, and to report on these lands to the Department of General Services . Existing law prescribes a process for the disposition of surplus state property.

This bill would authorize the Director of General Services to sell or lease property, of an unspecified acreage, known as the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Heman G. Stark Youth Correctional Facility, located in the City of Chino, in the County of San Bernardino, to the City of Chino at fair market value upon terms and conditions the director determines are in the best interests of the state.

This bill would require that the proceeds of the sale or lease be expended on bond payments, as specified, and other costs, including costs for the review of the sale of the property and bond counsel. The bill would authorize the director, notwithstanding those provisions, to sell the property below fair market value for purposes of providing housing to persons and families of low or moderate income, subject to reporting specified information 30 days before the sale to the chairpersons of the fiscal committees of the Legislature. This bill would exempt the sale of the property from the California Environmental Quality Act. The bill would require the net proceeds of the sale to be deposited into the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties, a continuously appropriated fund. By authorizing the deposit of proceeds into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.

Senate Governmental
Organization
Committee
SB 20 State Senator
Rubio
Joint Power Agreements: Regional Housing Trusts:

The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to form a joint powers authority to exercise any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law auth orizes the agreement to set forth the manner by which the joint powers authority will be governed. That act specifically authorizes the creation of the Orange County Housing Finance Trust and the San Gabriel Valley Regional Housing Trust, both joint powers authorities, for the purposes of funding housing to assist the homeless population and persons and families of extremely low, very low, and low income within their respective regions, as specified.

This bill would authorize 2 or more cities, by entering into a joint powers agreement pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Power s Act, to create a regional housing trust for the purposes of funding housing to assist the homeless population and persons and fam ilies of extremely low, very low, and low income within their jurisdictions. The bill would require a regional housing trust created pursuant to these provisions to be governed by a board of directors consisting of a minimum of 9 directors, as specified. The bill would authorize a regional housing trust to fund the planning and construction of housing, receive public and private financing and funds, and authorize and issue bonds, as specified. The bill would require the joint powers agreement establishing the regional housing trust to incorporate specified annual financial reporting and auditing requirements.

Senate Governance
and Finance
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 750 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

SB 459 State Senator
Rubio
Domestic Violence: Restraining Orders:

Existing law allows a criminal court to issue a protective order restraining a defendant from any contact with the victim if the defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence, human trafficking, a crime in furtherance of a criminal street gang, or a registerable sex offense. Under existing law, the protective order may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court.

Existing law allows a civil court, after notice and a hearing, to issue an order to enjoin a person from, among other things, attacking, stalking, or threatening another person. Under existing law, the protective order may be valid for up to 5 years, as determined by the court, and may be renewed for 5 or more years, or permanently, at the discretion of the court.

This bill would clarify that a protective order may be modified by the court throughout the duration of the order if the court is convinced that the modification is in the best interest of the victim.

Senate Judiciary
Committee
SB 690 State Senator
Rubio
Domestic Violence:

Existing law makes the infliction of corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition upon specified victims, including the offender’s spouse or former spouse, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or a fine of up to $6,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Existing law authorizes prosecution for that criminal act to be commenced within 5 years, and applies this provision to criminal acts that are committed on or after January 1, 2020, and to criminal acts for which the statute of limitations that was in effect prior to January 1, 2020, has not run as of January 1, 2020.

This bill would authorize prosecution for that crime to be commenced within 15 years. The bill would apply to crimes that are committed on or after January 1, 2024, and to crimes for which the statute of limitations that was in effect prior to January 1, 2024, has not run as of January 1, 2024. By extending the statute of limitations for a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

Senate Public Safety
Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 751 Exhibit B: Blue denotes additions, cross out denotes deletions, and red/italicized text denotes what the bill intends to achieve.

AB 1708 Assembly
Member
Muratsuchi
Corrections: rehabilitative programing. Theft.
(1) Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted by Proposition 47, as approved by the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, defines and prohibits an act of shoplifting and prohibits prosecution for an act of shoplifting under any other law.

This bill would refine the definition of shoplifting and would specifically exclude certain offenses from prosecution as shoplifting, including, among others, the theft of a firearm or vehicle, identity theft, and credit card fraud. (2) Existing law requires, except as excluded, the theft of any property valued below $950 to be charged as petty theft, a misdemeanor.

This bill would similarly exclude certain offenses from this provision, including, among others, the theft of a vehicle, identity theft, and credit card fraud.
(3) Existing law provides that a person with a prior conviction for specified sex offenses may be charged with a felony for shoplifting or for theft of property not exceeding $950 in value.

This bill would require a person convicted of petty theft or shoplifting, if the person has 2 or more prior convictions for specified theft-related offenses, to be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years. (4) Existing law, until January 1, 2026, authorizes a city or county prosecuting authority or county probation department to create a diversion or deferred entry of judgment program pursuant to this section for persons who commit a theft offense or repeat theft offenses, as specified.

This bill would authorize a city or county prosecuting authority or county probation department to create a diversion program for persons who commit theft or repeat theft offenses, as specified.
(5) This bill would provide that the provisions of the bill that amend Proposition 47 would become effective only upon approval of the voters, and would provide for the submission of those provisions to the voters for approval at the next statewide general election.

Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to conduct rehabilitative programming in a manner that meets specified requirements, including minimizing program wait times and offering a variety of program opportunities to inmates regardless of security level or sentence length.

This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would increase accountability for repeat offenders through participation in rehabilitative services.

Assembly Public
Safety Committee

13.20.k
City Legislative Positions - 2023-2024 - Legislative Session Packet Pg. 752 Revenue: Expenditure: 1002000-43300-N2034
Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY OF CHINO
FROM: CURTIS BURTON, COUNCIL MEMBER
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve community support fund contributions to: UCHOOZ ($500) and the Chino Valley YMCA for its Sustaining Campaign ($500).

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget.

CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:

The recommendation detailed above furthers the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Public Service Excellence through Internal and External Partnerships

13.21 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Packet Pg. 753
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
The City of Chino is fortunate to have multiple non -profits and community groups dedicated to serving the public and preserving Chino’s unique history. To assist in their ongoing efforts, the City Council from time to time, authorizes expenditures from the City’s community support fund.

These expenditures serve a valid public purpose by helping to continue the outstanding services that these organizations provide to our community.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
To continue this tra dition, Council Member Burton recommends that the City Council approve the following contributions:
· UCHOOZ Positive Youth: Provides positive activities and support for youth in and around the Downtown Chino area.
· Chino Valley YMCA: Provides a safe environment for the Chino community to engage in numerous educational and physical activities. The proposed contribution will go towards Chino Valley YMCA’s Sustaining Campaign to ensure continuity of services.

By approving these contributions, these groups will be better equipped to provide services to our community and our youth. Therefore, as proposed by Council Member Burton, staff recommends that the City Council approve the community support contributions to the UCHOOZ Positive Youth and the Chino Valley YMCA Sustaining Campaign.

13.21 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
Packet Pg. 754

Revenue: Expenditure: 1002000-43300-N2032

Transfer In: Transfer Out:

M E M O R A N D U M

CITY OF CHINO

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023

TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY OF CHINO

FROM: CHRISTOPHER FLORES, COUNCIL MEMBER

SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve community support fund contributions in the amount of $500 each to Chino High School Band - 77th Calvary and Chino Pumas Track Club.

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget.

13.22 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
Packet Pg. 755
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 4, 2023
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION
PAGE 2

BACKGROUND
The City of Chino is fortunate to have multiple non -profits and community groups dedicated to serving the public and preserving Chino’s unique history. To assist in their ongoing efforts, the City Council from time to time, authorizes expenditures from the City’s community support fund.

These expenditures serve a valid public purpose by helping to continue the outstanding services that these organizations provide to our community.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
To continue this tradition, Council Member Flores recommends that the City Council app rove the following contributions:
• Chino High School Band – 77th Calvary: An award -winning field competition band that has proudly represented Chino High School and the Chino Community at renowned events that include the 113th annual Rose Parade in Pasadena. • Chino Pumas Track Club – Dedicated to providing a fun training environment whil e teaching life skills such as the importance of self-discipline and self-belief.

By approving th ese contributions, these groups will be better equippe d to provide services to our community. Therefore, as proposed by Council Member Flores, staff recommends that the City Council approve the community support contributions to the Chino High School Band – 77th Calvary and the Chino Pumas Track Club.

13.22 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
Packet Pg. 756