I I I I I I I I I
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: X Yes No Satisfied: Yes X No
Signalization shall be considered if a point lies above the appropriate line or the Delay criteria is met. * Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane. * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
X
XX X
Scenario: OY 2026 w/Proj AM Peak
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Minor Street: Proj Dwy
Major Street: H St
# Lanes on Minor Street: 2 Peak Hour Data
# Lanes on Major Street: 2 Peak Major Minor
7 AM 1,398 104
Hour Route Route
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level
(Community less-than 10,000 population or speeds greater-than 70 km/hr [40 mph] on Major Street) DELAY
CRITERIA
1. Delay on Minor Approach (vehicle-
hours) 2. Volume on Minor Approach (veh/hr)
3. Total Entering Volume (veh/hr)
Number of Approaches
3 4 or more
Approaches Lanes: 1 2 Approaches Lanes 1 4
Volume Criteria 650 800150
Volume : 104
2 No. of Approaches 3
Delay Criteria: 4.0 5.0 Volume Criteria 100
NO
1,502
Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes 104 Volume :Delay: 0.5 0.6
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
100% Volume Level
150vph lower
threshold
100vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
0 100
200
300
400
500
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
70% Volume Level
100vph lower
threshold
75vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
Based on CA MUTCD 2014
NOTE: The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Date Printed: 2/21/2024 □ □
□ □
•
-
-, r
I I I I I I I I I
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: X Yes No Satisfied: X Yes No
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Minor Street: Proj Dwy
Major Street: H St
Scenario: OY 2026 w/Proj PM Peak
Signalization shall be considered if a point lies above the appropriate line or the Delay criteria is met. # Lanes on Minor Street: 2 Peak Hour Data
# Lanes on Major Street: 2 Peak Major Minor
4 PM 1,694 418
Hour Route Route
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level
(Community less-than 10,000 population or speeds greater-than 70 km/hr [40 mph] on Major Street) * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
X
XXX
DELAY
CRITERIA
1. Delay on Minor Approach (vehicle-
hours) 2. Volume on Minor Approach (veh/hr)
3. Total Entering Volume (veh/hr)
Number of Approaches
3 4 or more
Approaches Lanes: 1 2 Approaches Lanes 1 4
Volume Criteria 650 800150
Volume : 418
2 No. of Approaches 3
Delay Criteria: 4.0 5.0 Volume Criteria 100
NO
2,112
Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes 418 Volume :Delay: 1.4 39.1
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
100% Volume Level
150vph lower
threshold
100vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
0 100
200
300
400
500
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
70% Volume Level
100vph lower
threshold
75vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
Based on CA MUTCD 2014
NOTE: The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Date Printed: 2/21/2024 -,
I I I I I I
□
□
•
-
r
I I
□
□
I
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: X Yes No Satisfied: Yes X No
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Minor Street: Proj Dwy
Major Street: H St
Scenario: OY 2026 w/Total Proj AM Peak
Signalization shall be considered if a point lies above the appropriate line or the Delay criteria is met.
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level
Hour Route Route
7 AM 1,622 146
# Lanes on Minor Street: 2 Peak Hour Data
# Lanes on Major Street: 2 Peak Major Minor
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level
(Community less-than 10,000 population or speeds greater-than 70 km/hr [40 mph] on Major Street) * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
X
XX X NO
1,768
Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes 146 Volume :Delay: 1.4 1.4
Delay Criteria: 4.0 5.0 Volume Criteria 100
Volume : 146
2 No. of Approaches 3 4
Volume Criteria 650 800150
DELAY
CRITERIA
1. Delay on Minor Approach (vehicle-
hours) 2 . Volume on Minor Approach (veh/hr)
3. Total Entering Volume (veh/hr)
Number of Approaches
3 4 or more
Approaches Lanes: 1 2 Approaches Lanes 1
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
100% Volume
Level
150vph lower
threshold
100vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
0 100
200
300
400
500
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
70% Volume Level
100vph lower
threshold
75vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
Based on CA MUTCD 2014
NOTE: The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Date Printed: 2/21/2024 □ □
□ □
•
-
r, r
I I I I I I I I I
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: X Yes No Satisfied: X Yes No
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Minor Street: Proj Dwy
Major Street: H St
Scenario: OY 2026 w/Total Proj PM Peak
Signalization shall be considered if a point lies above the appropriate line or the Delay criteria is met.
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level
Hour Route Route
4 PM 2,576 562
# Lanes on Minor Street: 2 Peak Hour Data
# Lanes on Major Street: 2 Peak Major Minor
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
FIGURE W-3: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level
(Community less-than 10,000 population or speeds greater-than 70 km/hr [40 mph] on Major Street) * Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor route approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor route approach with one lane.
X
XXX NO
3,138
Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes NO Fulfilled? Yes 562 Volume :Delay: 1.9 224.4
Delay Criteria: 4.0 5.0 Volume Criteria 100
Volume : 562
2 No. of Approaches 3 4
Volume Criteria 650 800150
DELAY
CRITERIA
1. Delay on Minor Approach (vehicle-
hours) 2 . Volume on Minor Approach (veh/hr)
3. Total Entering Volume (veh/hr)
Number of Approaches
3 4 or more
Approaches Lanes: 1 2 Approaches Lanes 1
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
100% Volume
Level
150vph lower
threshold
100vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
0 100
200
300
400
500
MINOR ROUTE - HIGHER
VOLUME APPROACH [VPH]
MAJOR ROUTE - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES [VPH]
70% Volume Level
100vph lower
threshold
75vph lower
threshold
Active Curve
2+ Major & 2+
Minor
2+ Major & 1
Minor
1 Major & 2+
Minor
1 Major & 1 Minor
Based on CA MUTCD 2014
NOTE: The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Date Printed: 2/21/2024 □ □
□ □
•
-
-----
r, r
I I I I I I I I I
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Appendix L
Queuing Worksheets
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 11: Bay Blvd & G St Timing Plan: AM PEAK
OYWPAM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 58 166 397 392
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.17 0.46 0.32 0.48
Control Delay 19.0 7.6 21.7 4.9 10.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 19.0 7.6 21.7 4.9 10.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 0 35 37 51
Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 23 96 85 127
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1976 1218 1266
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 798 745 421 1484 965
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.08 0.39 0.27 0.41
Intersection Summary
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: AM PEAK
OYWPAM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 574 1142 147 12
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.31 0.68 0.38 0.03
Control Delay 22.9 5.6 9.4 18.7 9.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 22.9 5.6 9.4 18.7 9.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 31 48 27 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 63 175 79 10
Internal Link Dist (ft) 511 704 245
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 228 2689 1950 890 802
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.59 0.17 0.01
Intersection Summary
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/Proj (w/Improvements) 11: Bay Blvd & G St Timing Plan: PM PEAK
OYWPPM_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 134 56 88 781
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.30 0.33 0.08 0.84
Control Delay 27.4 6.6 35.1 5.1 24.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.4 6.6 35.1 5.1 24.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 0 22 10 242
Queue Length 95th (ft) 136 38 #62 29 #525
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1976 1218 1266
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250
Base Capacity (vph) 601 625 169 1410 1153
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.21 0.33 0.06 0.68
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: PM PEAK
OYWPPM_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 772 1057 408 47
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.48 0.71 0.71 0.09
Control Delay 23.8 10.0 15.9 22.8 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 23.8 10.0 15.9 22.8 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 70 105 92 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 118 #285 #246 19
Internal Link Dist (ft) 425 831 147
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 191 2394 1655 753 700
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.32 0.64 0.54 0.07
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Wohl Bayfront SP Existing Plus 100% Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: AM PEAK
EXWPAM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 182 713 147 12
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.13 0.53 0.32 0.03
Control Delay 17.7 5.4 5.2 14.3 8.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.7 5.4 5.2 14.3 8.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 7 10 14 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 21 56 73 9
Internal Link Dist (ft) 215 704 245
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 330 2910 2125 1082 973
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.06 0.34 0.14 0.01
Intersection Summary
Wohl Bayfront SP Existing Plus 100% Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: PM PEAK
EXWPPM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 727 1016 564 47
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.53 0.77 0.79 0.07
Control Delay 24.4 13.1 18.0 24.5 4.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.4 13.1 18.0 24.5 4.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 85 106 125 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 127 #266 #350 17
Internal Link Dist (ft) 173 831 147
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 179 2004 1379 823 761
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.36 0.74 0.69 0.06
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 11: Bay Blvd & G St Timing Plan: AM PEAK
OYWPAM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 58 166 397 392
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.17 0.46 0.32 0.48
Control Delay 19.0 7.6 21.7 4.9 10.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 19.0 7.6 21.7 4.9 10.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 0 35 37 51
Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 23 96 85 127
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1976 1218 1266
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 798 745 421 1484 965
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.08 0.39 0.27 0.41
Intersection Summary
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: AM PEAK
OYWPAM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 574 1142 147 12
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.31 0.68 0.38 0.03
Control Delay 22.9 5.6 9.4 18.7 9.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 22.9 5.6 9.4 18.7 9.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 31 48 27 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 63 175 79 10
Internal Link Dist (ft) 511 704 245
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 228 2689 1950 890 802
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.59 0.17 0.01
Intersection Summary
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 11: Bay Blvd & G St Timing Plan: PM PEAK
OYWPPM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 197 160 88 822
v/c Ratio 0.79 0.42 0.74 0.07 0.91
Control Delay 50.4 7.9 59.5 4.6 33.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 50.4 7.9 59.5 4.6 33.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 0 90 14 381
Queue Length 95th (ft) #266 55 #194 27 #637
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1976 1218 1266
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 400 509 227 1406 1069
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.39 0.70 0.06 0.77
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Wohl Bayfront SP Opening Year 2026 w/100% Proj (w/Improvements) 31: H St & Proj Dwy Timing Plan: PM PEAK
OYWPPM_100_IMP.syn Synchro 11 Report
02/14/2024
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1120 1668 564 47
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.59 0.93 0.91 0.08
Control Delay 52.0 17.0 33.0 50.9 7.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.0 17.3 33.0 50.9 7.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 248 485 329 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 310 #788 #604 26
Internal Link Dist (ft) 425 831 147
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100
Base Capacity (vph) 85 2156 1791 650 610
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 451 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.66 0.93 0.87 0.08
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Appendix M
SANDAG 2050 Series 13 ABM2+ Plots
ffi
D
CHlAA,..,!iTA
WU,.D1.IFR
P~LSEJilVE
\_
1916
-------------
\
\ \ \ - ,~ ~
-0
!.
t .. l
c;:!'>'
\
\__----
\
\
-;.
l VNWOOD 1-llllS
200
./ = Leaflet I @ OpenStree!.Map. oontnbutocs © C a'100 3_ C ari.oDB atl.nbulton s. +
D
C.RA.N0Ci\R 8
SMORUIN Pt,TII(
\.._-..---
\
\ l
LYNWOOD HILLS
200
\ --·~
+
0 \.. 25 50 100 200
\
_,-/\
__,.-, ~ Leafle t J © Ope nStreElM 3p contnbutOfS © Caru::iDB. arto06 attributi.Ons Chula Vista BayfTont Master Plan
J111"'7-H K"rnley•Hom
111.J-LJ and Associates, Inc.
•
1 • \
5-159
• XX% = Project Trip Distribution
tJ·. *I.
s: Zftj/.
e: i,·1.
lfOTltlOOALE
FIGURE 5-58
Proposed Project: Phase IV Trip Distribution