Attachment 3.11 - Appendix K Local Mobility Analysis.pdf — Chula Vista City Council, November 18, 2025 (part 1 of 7)

Appendix K
Local Mobility Analysis

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Planning Area B-1
Planning Areas A & B-2
Local Mobility Analysis

Prepared for:

PSIP Wohl Bay Boulevard, LLC
2251 San Diego Avenue, Suite A-247
San Diego, CA 92110

PW G Street, LLC
2251 San Diego Avenue, Suite A-247
San Diego, CA 92110

Prepared by:

Marc Mizuta, PE, TE, PTOE

5694 Mission Center Road, #602-121
San Diego, CA 92108

April 2024

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan i
Local Mobility Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ E1 1 INTRODUC TION .............................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 P ROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1.2 P ROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 4

2.1 S TUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 A NALYSIS SCENARIOS .......................................................................................................................................... 4

2.3 M ETHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................... 7

2.3.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 7

2.4 I MPROVEMENT THRESHOLDS ............................................................................................................................ 8 3 EXISTING CONDITIO NS .............................................................................................................................. 10

3.1 R OADWAY NETWORK ...................................................................................................................................... 10

3.2 M ULTI-MODAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 11

3.2.1 Pedestrian Access ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11

3.2.2 Bicycle Access ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14

3.2.3 Transit Service ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14

3.3 T RAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................................................................................ 15

3.4 I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 15 4 PROJECT-LEVEL PR OJECT TRAFFIC ..................................................................................................... 21

4.1 T RIP GENERATION ............................................................................................................................................. 21

4.2 T RIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT ........................................................................................................ 23 5 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 30

5.1 R OADWAY NETWORK ......................................................................................................................................30

5.2 T RAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................................... 34

5.3 I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 34

5.4 P ROJECT FAIR SHARE ....................................................................................................................................... 40

5.5 I MPROVEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 40 6 OPENING YEAR TRAF FIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 45

6.1 R OADWAY NETWORK ..................................................................................................................................... 45

6.2 B ACKGROUND TRAFFIC................................................................................................................................... 49

6.3 C UMULATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................. 49

6.4 T RAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................................... 49

6.5 I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 61

6.6 P ROJECT FAIR SHARE ....................................................................................................................................... 64

6.7 I MPROVEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 65

6.8 S IGNAL WARRANTS .......................................................................................................................................... 70

6.9 Q UEUING ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................................... 71

6.10 M ULTI-MODAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 72

6.10.1 Pedestrian Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 74

6.10.2 Bicycle Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 75

6.10.3 Transit Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 7 PROGRAMMATIC-LEVEL PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................. 76

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan ii
Local Mobility Analysis

7.1 T RIP GENERATION ............................................................................................................................................. 76

7.2 T RIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT ........................................................................................................ 76 8 EXISTING PLUS TOTAL PROJEC T TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................ 98

8.1 R OADWAY NETWORK ..................................................................................................................................... 99

8.2 T RAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................................... 99

8.3 I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 119

8.4 P ROJECT FAIR SHARE ...................................................................................................................................... 123

8.5 I MPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 123

8.6 Q UEUING ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 130 9 OPENING YEAR PLUS TOTAL PROJ ECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................... 131

9.1 R OADWAY NETWORK ..................................................................................................................................... 131

9.2 T RAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................................... 131

9.3 I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 140

9.4 P ROJECT FAIR SHARE ...................................................................................................................................... 143

9.5 I MPROVEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 144

9.6 S IGNAL WARRANTS ......................................................................................................................................... 151

9.7 Q UEUING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................................... 151 10 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 153

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan iii
Local Mobility Analysis

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure E-1 Existing Intersection Improvements ......................................................................................................... E5 Figure E-2 Opening Year 2026 Intersection Improvements .................................................................................... E6 Figure 1-1 Planning Areas ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1-2 Project Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2-1 Study Intersections ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 3-1 Existing Intersection Geometrics ................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 3-2 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................ 18 Figure 4-1 Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 4-2 Project Trip Assignment ............................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 5-1 Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics ........................................................................................ 31 Figure 5-2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 35 Figure 5-3 Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements .............................................. 42 Figure 6-1 Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics .......................................................................................... 46 Figure 6-2 Location of Cumulative Projects ................................................................................................................. 51 Figure 6-3 Cumulative Project Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................................... 52 Figure 6-4 Opening Year 2026 Without Project Traffic Volumes .......................................................................... 55 Figure 6-5 Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes ................................................................................58 Figure 6-6 Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics With Improvements .................................................. 67 Figure 6-7 Multi-Modal Analysis Study Area .............................................................................................................. 73 Figure 7-1 Planning Level A Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 78 Figure 7-2 Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Distribution ......................................................................................... 82 Figure 7-3 Planning Level A Project Trip Assignment .............................................................................................. 86 Figure 7-4 Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Assignment .......................................................................................... 90 Figure 7-5 Total Project Trip Assignment .................................................................................................................... 94 Figure 8-1 Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics ........................................................................... 100 Figure 8-2 Existing Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................... 103 Figure 8-3 Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 107 Figure 8-4 Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 111 Figure 8-5 Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 115 Figure 8-6 Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements .................................. 127 Figure 9-1 Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics ...................................................... 132 Figure 9-2 Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes ..................................................................... 136 Figure 9-3 Opening Year Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements ........................ 147

LIST OF TABLES
Table E-1 Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................. E3 Table E-2 Summary of Peak-Hour Intersection LOS ................................................................................................ E8 Table E-3 Summary of Existing Plus Project Improvements ................................................................................ E12 Table E-4 Summary of Opening Year Project Improvements ................................................................................ E13 Table E-5 Summary of Total Net Project Trip Generation Budget ..................................................................... E14 Table E-6 Summary of Project Fair Share ....................................................................................................................E15 Table E-7 Summary of Total Project Improvements and Responsibility ........................................................... E16 Table E-8 Summary of Signal Warrant Analysis ....................................................................................................... E17 Table E-9 Summary of Queuing Analysis ....................................................................................................................E18 Table 2-1 Study Intersections ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Table 2-2 LOS Criteria for Intersections ......................................................................................................................... 7 Table 2-3 Transportation Improvement Thresholds .................................................................................................... 8 Table 2-4 Recommended Improvements......................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3-1 Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary ....................................................................................... 16

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan iv
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 4-1 Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................. 22 Table 5-1 Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary ............................................................... 38 Table 5-2 Existing Plus Project Fair Share ................................................................................................................... 40 Table 5-3 Project Improvements ...................................................................................................................................... 41 Table 6-1 Cumulative Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................... 50 Table 6-2 Opening Year Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary ........................................................................... 62 Table 6-3 Opening Year Project Fair Share .................................................................................................................. 65 Table 6-4 Project Improvements .................................................................................................................................... 66 Table 6-5 Project Traffic Peak-Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary .............................................. 71 Table 6-6 Opening Year Queuing Analysis Summary ................................................................................................ 71 Table 6-7 Potential Improvements to Accommodate the Project’s Active Transportation Needs ................74 Table 7-1 Total Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................ 77 Table 8-1 Total Net Project Trip Generation Budget Summary ............................................................................. 98 Table 8-2 Existing Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary ................................................. 120 Table 8-3 Existing Plus Total Project Fair Share ....................................................................................................... 124 Table 8-4 Existing Plus Total Project Improvements .............................................................................................. 125 Table 8-5 Existing Plus Total Project Queuing Analysis Summary ..................................................................... 130 Table 9-1 Opening Year Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary ........................................ 141 Table 9-2 Opening Year Plus Total Project Fair Share ........................................................................................... 144 Table 9-3 Opening Year Plus Total Project Improvements .................................................................................... 145 Table 9-4 Total Project Traffic Peak-Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary .................................. 151 Table 9-5 Opening Year Plus Total Project Queuing Analysis Summary ........................................................... 152

APPENDICES
Appendix A Project Information Form (PIF)
Appendix B Proposed Near-Term Study Area Memo
Appendix C Signal Timing Sheets
Appendix D Excerpts for Multi-Modal Analysis
Appendix E Existing Traffic Volume Data
Appendix F Intersection LOS Worksheets
Appendix G Trip Assignment Figures (No PCE Adjustments) Appendix H Population Data
Appendix I Cumulative Projects
Appendix J Intersection LOS Worksheets with Improvements Appendix K Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets
Appendix L Queuing Worksheets
Appendix M SANDAG 2050 Series 13 ABM2+ Plots

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Local Mobility Analysis (LMA) evaluates the traffic conditions associated with the proposed Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan project located in the City of Chula Vista. The traffic analyses have been prepared in accordance with the City of Chula Vista Transportation Study Guidelines (TSG), January 2022 (City’s TSG) and coordination with the City’s Development Services Department.

Project Description
This LMA consists of a combination of a project- and programmatic-level analyses. The project-level analysis would be completed for the uses in Planning Area B-1. The programmatic-level analysis would be completed for the uses in Planning Areas A and B-2. Due to the uncertainty of the specific uses for Planning Areas A and B-2, the most probable and maximum intensity land uses were assumed for those areas (i.e., industrial uses that include commercial land us es). It should be noted that “the Project” refers to the project-level analysis of Planning Area B-1 a nd “the Total Project” refers to the programmatic-level analysis of Planning Areas A and B-2 and includes traffic from Planning Area B-1.

A Project Information Form (PIF) has been prepared and approved on April 4, 2024 for Planning Area B-1 and documents that the Project will be screened out from any CEQA VMT analysis based on satisfying the criteria of the Project being located in a VMT-e fficient area and is presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. The Project is estimated to be constructed and in operation by 2026.

Study Area
The Project is forecasted to genera te more than 200 daily trips a nd consistent with relevant City planning documents. As a result, the Project is required to complete a LMA. There are 27 existing intersections located within the st udy area. With the addition of the Project, there would be an additional three intersections and five project driveways. With the addition of the Total Project, two additional project driveways would be added to the stud y area for a total of 30 intersections and 7 project driveways. The specific intersections within the st udy area were developed by coordination with City staff and considered key intersections based on the projected traffic generation and distribution.

Project Traffic
Trip generation rates published by the SANDAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffi c Generation Rates for the San Diego Region , April 2002 were applied to the existing and proposed uses on site to estimate the traffic generation characteristics of the site. It should be noted that the trips associated with the industrial use have been separated into passenger cars and trucks and converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE) for analysis purposes only. Table E-1 summarizes the weekday trip generation calculations.

As shown in the table, the Project is estimated to generate a subtotal of 7,52 0 daily trips with 903 AM peak-hour trips and 903 PM peak-hour trips for the Pr oject-Level Analyses. The Project is estimated to generate a subtotal of 8,168 daily trips with 487 AM peak-hour trips and 767 PM peak-hour trips for the Programmatic Level Analyses. After applying the existing trip credits, the Project-Level Analysis is E1

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
estimated to generate a net total of 5,115 daily trips with 446 AM peak-hour trips and 442 PM peak-hour trips. The Programmatic-Level Analys is is estimated to generate a net total of 6,349 daily trips with 210 AM peak-hour trips and 460 PM peak-hour trips. The net sum of the Total Project is estimated to generate a net total of 11,464 daily trips with 888 AM peak-hour trips and 882 PM peak-hour trips.

The following summarizes the trip generation for the Project with the PCE adjustments. These values are only used for analysis purposes only and should not be used for fair share calculations.

 Project-Level subtotal: 8,501 ADT, 1,065 AM peak-hour, 1,065 PM peak-hour  Programmatic-Level subtotal: 8,581 ADT, 557 AM peak-hour, 837 PM peak-hour  Net Project-Level: 6.096 ADT, 608 AM peak-hour, 584 PM peak-hour  Net Programmatic-Level: 6,762 ADT, 280 AM peak-hour, 530 PM peak-hour  Net Sum Total Project: 12,858 ADT, 888 AM peak-hour, 1,114 PM peak-hour

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-1
Project Trip Generation
Land Use
Planning
Area Amount ADT1

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Uses
Warehousing A 231.174 ksf 1,156 106 45 151 70 104 174
Manufacturing/Assembly B-1 601.225 ksf 2,405 412 45 457 97 384 481 Manufacturing/Assembly B-2 165.612 ksf 663 114 12 126 27 106 133 Existing Trips 4,224 632 102 734 194 594 788
Proposed Uses
Project-Level Analysis
Industrial/Business Park
(w/commercial) B-1 470.000 ksf 7,520 723 180 903 181 722 903 Passenger Cars (83.1% Daily, 88.2% AM, 88.2% PM): 6,884 638 159 797 160 637 797 Trucks (16.9% Daily, 11.8% AM, 11.8% PM)2: 636 85 21 106 21 85 106 Subtotal (Trucks with PCE): 1,617 215 53 268 53 215 268 Subtotal: Project-Level Analysis
Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars & Trucks) 7,520 723 180 903 181 722 903 Trip Generation (Passenger Cars & Trucks w/PCE) 8,501 853 212 1,065 213 852 1,065 Net: Project-Level Analysis
Net Sum Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars &
Trucks) 5,115 311 135 446 84 338 422
Net Sum Trip Generation (Passenger Cars & Trucks
w/PCE) 6,096 441 167 608 116 468 584
Programmatic-Level Analysis
Industrial/Business Park
(w/commercial) A 198.000 ksf 3,168 305 76 381 77 304 381 Passenger Cars (83.1% Daily, 88.2% AM, 88.2% PM): 2,900 269 67 336 68 268 336 Trucks (16.9% Daily, 11.8% AM, 11.8% PM)2: 268 36 9 45 9 36 45 Subtotal (Trucks with PCE): 681 92 23 115 23 92 115
Resort Hotel B-2 175 rm 1,400 42 28 70 40 58 98
Quality Restaurant B-2 36.000 ksf 3,600 22 14 36 202 86 288 Subtotal: Programmatic-Level Analysis
Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars & Trucks) 8,168 369 118 487 319 448 767 Trip Generation (Passenger Cars & Trucks w/PCE) 8,581 425 132 557 333 504 837 Net: Programmatic-Level Analysis
Net Sum Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars &
Trucks) 6,349 149 61 210 222 238 460
Net Sum Trip Generation (Passenger Cars & Trucks
w/PCE) 6,762 205 75 280 236 294 530

NET SUM TOTAL PROJECT (PASSENGER CARS &
TRUCKS) 11,464 460 196 656 306 576 882

NET SUM TOTAL PROJECT (PASSENGER CARS &
TRUCKS W/PCE) 12,858 646 242 888 352 762 1,114
Notes:
ksf: 1,000 sf, rm: rooms
Highlighted rows in blue show values with PCE adjustments.

1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002.

2. The truck trip rates for the project’s land uses are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition for the Industrial Park land use (LUC 130).

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Analysis Results
Intersection Operation Analysis
Based on the analysis conducted in this study, all in tersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D under all scenarios with the exception of 11 and 18 intersections under the Opening Year 2026 With Project and Horizon Year 2050 With Project scenarios, respectively, which would operate at LOS E/F during one of the peak periods.

To isolate the Project’s effects on the study area intersections, the Existing Plus Project scenario resulted in two intersections that would operate at LOS E/F during one of the peak periods. With the addition of the entire project, the Existing Plus Total project scenario resulted in five intersections that would operate at LOS E/F during one of the peak periods.

Table E-2 summarizes the results under each scenario.

Project Improvements
Improvements were identified and analyzed at the af fected intersections that would operate at LOS E/F with the Project. To isolate the Project’s effects, re sults from the Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Total Project scenarios were refere nced. Based on the Project’s fa ir share contribution at each intersection, the Project would be fully responsi ble for improvements at one location and would contribute its fair share at the other location un der the Existing Plus Project scenario. Under the Existing Plus Total Project scenar io, the Project would be fully responsible for improvements at three locations and would contribute its fair share at the other two locations.

Table E-3 summarizes the proposed improvements at the a ffected intersections under the Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Total Project scenarios. Figure E-1 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections under the Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Total Project scenarios.

The Project would be fully responsible for improvements at seven locations and would contribute its fair share at three locations under the Opening Year With Project scenario. Under the Opening Year Plus Total Project scenario, the Project would be responsi ble for improvements at nine locations and would contribute its fair share at the other three locations.

Table E-4 summarizes the proposed improvements at the affected intersections under the Opening Year With Project and Opening Year Wi th Total Project scenarios. Figure E-2 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections under the Opening Year With Project and Opening Year With Total Project scenarios.

E4
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Oaklawn AveWoodlawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
Figure E-1
Existing Intersection Improvements
LEGEND
Note:

Project responsibility: 100% if both pie pieces filled in; fair share if only one pie piece filled in
චචචච
2121 2222
1212
2626
3131
3030
2828
2929
3636
3232
3737
2020
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2323
2424
2525
2727
1111
1515
Existing Plus Proj
Existing Plus Total Proj
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
E5
ZUTA

IC CONSUL
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Oaklawn AveWoodlawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
Figure E-2
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Improvements
LEGEND
Note:

Project responsibility: 100% if both pie pieces filled in; fair share if only one pie piece filled in
චචචච
2121 2222
1212
2626
3131
3030
2828
2929
3636
3232
3737
2020
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2323
2424
2525
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
Opening Year Plus Proj
Opening Year Plus Total Proj
3333
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
E6
ZUTA

IC CONSUL

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Trip Generation Budget
In order to provide more flexibility for the developm ent within Planning Areas A and B-2 or the potential to accommodate at least a partial development of Pla nning Areas A and B-2 before the completion of the Year 2050 roadway network, an Existing Plus Total Project (Planning Areas B-1 Plus Planning Areas A & B-2) was evaluated. Additionally, three scenarios that reflected a perc entage of the Total Project were evaluated and summarized below:

 Scenario 1: 85 percent of Total Project
 Scenario 2: 70 percent of Total Project
 Scenario 3: 55 percent of Total Project

Table E-5 summarizes the trip generation for the Total Project and the three scenarios ranging from 55 percent to 85 percent of the Total Project.

Project Fair Share
Table E-6 summarizes the project’s fair share percentage at the affected intersecti ons for all scenarios.

With the addition of the Project, the fair share percentage would range betw een 1.0 percent and 38.5 percent. With the addition of the Total Project, the fair share percentage would range between 1.5 percent and 86.9 percent.

Table E-7 summarizes the project’s responsibility at the affected intersections for all scenarios. The Existing Plus Total Project scenario resulted in five affected intersections with the number of affected intersections decreasing to four affected intersections under Scenario 3.

Signal Warrant Analysis
Table E-8 summarizes the signal warrant analysis at the fi ve intersections where a traffic signal is being proposed. It should be noted that a roundabout was considered at all locations, but was dismissed at all except for the Bay Boulevard & F Street intersection due to a combination of design constraints, right-of- way, larger turning radius required to accommodate larger trucks, and shifting of roadways. The peak- hour signal warrant analysis was satisfied at all lo cations under the Opening Year 2026 with Project and Total Project scenarios. Under the Existing Plus Project scenario, only th e J Street and L Street intersections with Bay Boulevard would satisfy the peak-hour signal warrant. With the addition of the Total Project traffic under Existing Conditions, the Project Driveway & H Street intersection would also satisfy the peak-hour signal warrant.

Project Driveway Queuing
Table E-8 summarizes the queuing analysis at the two project driveways off G Street and H Street where a traffic signal is being proposed. As shown in the ta ble, all queues would be contained in the respective turn pockets under the Opening Year 2026 with Projec t scenario. With the addition of the traffic from Planning Areas A and B-2, there would be one moveme nt under the Existing Plus Total Project scenario and two movements under the Opening Year 2026 With Total project scenario where the queue length would exceed the available storage length. However, the queues that extend past the turn pocket can either be accommodated in the adjacent lane and/or along the internal side streets.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-2
Summary of Peak-Hour Intersection LOS
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS
Existing
Conditions
Existing
Plus Proj
Existing
Plus Total
Project
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year
2026 w/Proj
Opening Year
2026 w/Total
Proj
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St AM B B B B C C

PM C C C D D D
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St AM D D D E E E

PM B B B B B B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St AM B B B B B B

PM B B B B B B
4 Broadway & E St AM D D D D D D

PM D D D D D D
5 Fifth Ave & E St AM B B B B B B

PM B B B B B B
6 Fourth Ave & E St AM D D D D D D

PM D D D D D D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM A B B C C C

PM C C C D E E
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AM A A A A A A

PM B B B B B B
9 Broadway & F St AM D D D D D D

PM D D D D D D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St AM n/a1 PM
Notes:

1. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

2. The intersection will be constructed as part of the Project.

3. The intersection will be constructed by others.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-2
Summary of Peak-Hour Intersection LOS (cont.)
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS
Existing
Conditions
Existing
Plus Proj
Existing
Plus Total
Project
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year
2026 w/Proj
Opening Year
2026 w/Total
Proj
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM B B B C C D

PM A C D C F F
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM C C B C C D

PM C D F D F F
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St AM C C C C C C

PM D D D C C C
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St AM B B B B B B

PM B B C C D F
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St AM B B B B B B

PM B B B B B B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St AM C C C C C C

PM C C C C C C
17 Broadway & H St AM C C C C C C

PM C C C C C C
18 Fifth Ave & H St AM D D D D D D

PM B B B B B B
19 Fourth Ave & H St AM D D D D D D

PM D D D D D D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy AM A A A A A A

PM A A A A B B
Notes:

1. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

2. The intersection will be constructed as part of the Project.

3. The intersection will be constructed by others.

PM B B B F F F
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM D D D D D D

PM F F F C F F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St AM C C C F F F

PM B B B C D D
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AM C C C D D D

PM C C C C D D
25 Broadway & J St AM D D D D D D

PM D D D D E E
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM B B B B B B

PM F F F F F F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St AM B B B B B B

PM D D D D D D
28 W Proj Dwy & G St AM n/a2 A A n/a2 A A

PM A A A A
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St AM n/a2 A A n/a2 A A

PM A A A A
30 E Proj Dwy & G St AM n/a2 A A n/a2 A A

PM A A A A
Notes:

1. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

2. The intersection will be constructed as part of the Project.

3. The intersection will be constructed by others.

E10

PM D F F F
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St AM n/a2 B B n/a2 B B

PM B B C D
33 Marina Pkwy & H St AM n/a2 n/a 2 A B B B

PM A B C C
34 Marina Pkwy & Street C AM n/a2 n/a 2 A A A A

PM A A A A
35 Street A & J St AM n/a2 n/a 2 A A A A

PM A A A A
36 PA-A Proj Dwy & G St AM n/a2 n/a 2 A n/a2 n/a 2 A
PM B C
37 PA-A Proj Dwy & H St AM n/a2 n/a 2 B n/a2 n/a 2 B
PM C B
Notes:

1. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

2. The intersection will be constructed as part of the Project.

3. The intersection will be constructed by others.

E11

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-3
Summary of Existing Plus Project Improvements
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS
Improvement
Project
Responsibility2
Existing Plus
Project
With
Improvements
Existing Plus
Total Project
With
Improvements
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM n/a1 n/a 1 B C Signal retiming n/a / 100% PM F D 21 Bay Blvd & J St AM E C E C Signalize
intersection3
Fair Share / Fair
Share PM B C B B
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM D B D B Signal retiming 100% / 100% PM F C F C 26 Bay Blvd & L St AM B A B B Signalize
intersection4
Fair Share / Fair
Share PM F C F B
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM n/a1 n/a 1 C B Signalize intersection n/a / 100% PM F C Notes:

1. Improvements are not required since intersection would operate at LOS D or better.

2. The first value represents the project’s responsibility for the Existing Plus Project scenario. The second value represents the project’s responsibility for the Existing Plus Total Project scenario.

3. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

E12
I I~ I

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-4
Summary of Opening Year Project Improvements
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS
Improvement
Project
Responsibility2
Opening
Year 2026
w/Proj
With
Improvements
Opening
Year 2026
w/Total Proj
With
Improvements
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St AM E D E D Signal retiming 100% / 100% PM B B B B 7 Bay Blvd & F St
AM C B C A Signalize intersection Fair Share / Fair
Share PM E C E C
AM C B C C Construct roundabout5 Fair Share / Fair
Share PM E F E F
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM C A D A Signalize intersection 100% / 100% PM F B F C 12 Bay Blvd & H St AM C C D C Restripe SB approach
Signal retiming6 100% / 100% PM F C F D
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St AM n/a1 n/a 1 B B Signal retiming n/a / 100% PM F C 21 Bay Blvd & J St AM F D F D Signalize intersection3 Fair Share / Fair Share PM F C F C
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM D C D C Signal retiming 100% / 100% PM F C F C 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St AM F D F D Signal retiming 100% / 100% PM D C D C 25 Broadway & J St AM D D D D Signal retiming 100% / 100% PM E D E D 26 Bay Blvd & L St AM B B B B Signalize intersection4 Fair Share / Fair Share PM F C F C

E13

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-4
Summary of Opening Year Project Improvements (cont.)
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS
Improvement
Project
Responsibility2
Opening
Year 2026
w/Proj
With
Improvements
Opening
Year 2026
w/Total Proj
With
Improvements
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM C A E A Signalize intersection 100% / 100% PM F B F D Notes:

1. Improvements are not required since intersection would operate at LOS D or better.

2. The first value represents the project’s responsibility for the Opening Year with Project scenario. The second value represents the project’s responsibility for the Opening Year with Total Project scenario.

3. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

5. Improvement is based on the 30% concep tual design and includes 1-lane approaches on all legs. The feasibility of expanding the roundabout and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.

6. Improvement is considered a conceptual design whose feasibility, including adequacy of turn bay storage and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.

Table E-5
Summary of Total Net Project Trip Generation Budget
Development Scenario ADT

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In Out Total In Out Total
Net Project-Level Analysis (PA B-1)1 6,096 441 167 608 116 468 584 Net Programmatic-Level Analysis (PA A & B-2)1 6,762 205 75 280 236 294 530 Total Net Project2 12,858 646 242 888 352 762 1,114
Scenario 1 Total Net Project (85%)3 11,844 615 231 846 317 718 1,035 Scenario 2 Total Net Project (70%)3 10,829 585 220 805 281 674 955 Scenario 3 Total Net Project (55%)3 9,815 554 208 762 246 630 876 Notes:

All trip generation estimates include PCEs.

1. The trip generation was referenced from Table E-1.

2. The Total Net Project is the sum of the Net Project-Level Analysis + Net Programmatic-Level Analysis.

3. The various Total Net Project scenarios with the respective perc ent reduction is the sum of the Net Project-Level Analysis + th e Net Programmatic-Level Analysis multiplied by the respective percent reduction.

E14

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-6
Summary of Project Fair Share
# Intersection
Fair Share (% Proj)
Peak
Hour
Existing
Plus Proj
Existing
Plus Total
Proj
Existing
Plus
Scenario 1
Total Proj
Existing
Plus
Scenario 2
Total Proj
Existing
Plus
Scenario 3
Total Proj
Opening
Year Plus
Proj
Opening
Year Plus
Total Proj
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St AM 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.2% 2.3% PM 2.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.2%
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM 7.4% 9.9% 9.0% 8.2% 7.3% 4.4% 6.0% PM 4.9% 9.0% 8.0% 6.8% 5.9% 3.3% 6.1%
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM 39.3% 50.2% 39.4% 37.4% 35.1% 20.1% 28.1% PM 26.4% 45.9% 37.4% 34.3% 31.0% 15.5% 30.2%
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM 44.3% 55.4% 51.9% 47.9% 42.8% 18.2% 25.8% PM 29.6% 50.4% 46.5% 42.1% 36.5% 13.4% 27.2%
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St AM 9.0% 12.6% 11.4% 10.2% 9.0% 6.5% 9.2% PM 8.0% 15.5% 13.7% 11.8% 9.8% 6.1% 12.0%
21 Bay Blvd & J St AM 10.3% 13.5% 12.4% 11.2% 10.2% 5.6% 7.5% PM 11.3% 19.1% 17.4% 15.3% 13.6% 5.3% 9.3%
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM 3.0% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 3.0% 2.1% 2.5% PM 2.9% 4.2% 3.9% 3.5% 3.3% 1.9% 2.7%
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St AM 2.1% 2.5% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 1.7% 2.0% PM 2.0% 2.9% 2.7% 2.4% 2.2% 1.5% 2.3%
25 Broadway & J St AM 1.4% 1.7% 1.6% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.5% PM 1.2% 1.8% 1.7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.0% 1.6%
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM 8.2% 11.4% 10.4% 9.4% 8.1% 6.2% 8.7% PM 4.7% 9.1% 8.1% 7.1% 5.8% 3.8% 7.4%
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM 80.1% 85.5% 84.8% 84.1% 83.4% 37.1% 46.3% PM 75.0% 86.9% 85.9% 84.7% 83.3% 38.5% 58.2%
33 Marina Pkwy & H St AM 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4.0% 6.4% PM 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2.9% 13.6%
Notes:

Only intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the Project are shown in the table.

The fair share calculations are based on actual traffic volumes and do not include PCE adjustments.

Shaded cells represent intersections that would operate at LOS E/F.

E15

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-7
Summary of Total Project Improvements and Responsibility # Intersection
Peak
Hour
LOS with Improvements / Project Responsiblilty2
Existing Plus Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 3 Total
Project
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM C / 100% C / 100% C / 100% n/a 1 PM D D D 21 Bay Blvd & J St AM C / FS C / FS C / FS C / FS PM B B B B 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM B / 100% B / 100% B / 100% B / 100% PM C C C C 26 Bay Blvd & L St AM B / FS A / FS A / FS B / FS PM B B B B 31 Proj Dwy & H St AM B / 100% B / 100% B / 100% A / 100% PM C B B B Notes:

1. Improvements are not required since intersection would operate at LOS D or better.

2. FS: Fair Share. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

E16

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-8
Summary of Signal Warrant Analysis
# Intersection
Warrant 3 Met?1
Existing Plus Proj
Existing Plus Total
Proj
Opening Year 2026
w/Proj
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
7 Bay Blvd & F St n/a2 n/a 2 Yes Yes
11 Bay Blvd & G St n/a2 n/a 2 Yes Yes
21 Bay Blvd & J St Yes Yes Yes Yes
26 Bay Blvd & L St Yes Yes Yes Yes
31 Proj Dwy & H St n/a2 Yes Yes Yes
Notes:

1. The signal warrant analysis was performed using the criteria outlined in Chapter 4C of the CA MUTCD 2014 for Warrant 3, Peak-Hour.

2. The intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS.

E17
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table E-9
Summary of Queuing Analysis
Intersection Peak Hour Movement
Storage
Length (ft)1
Queue Length (ft)2
Opening Year 2026
w/Proj
Existing Plus Total
Proj
Opening Year Plus
Total Proj
11 Bay Blvd & G St
AM NB LT3 280 96 0 96
PM 62 0 194
AM EB LT3 150 53 0 53
PM 136 0 266
AM EB RT 150 23 0 23
PM 38 0 55
31 Proj Dwy & H St
AM EB LT 170 40 37 40
PM 18 18 29
AM SB LT3 325 79 73 79
PM 246 350 604
AM SB RT 325 10 9 10
PM 19 17 26
Notes:

Values shown in bold indicate movements where the queue length exceeds the available storage length.

1. The storage length was based on the latest site plan prepar ed for the project and/or conceptual plans for the traffic signal.

2. The queue length shown represents the 95th percentile queue length for each respective movement and is reported from Synchro 11.

3. The queues that extend past the turn pocket can either be accommodated in the adjacent lane and/or along the internal side streets.

E18
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
1 INTRODUCTION
This Local Mobility Analysis (LMA) evaluates the traffic conditions associated with the proposed Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan project located in the City of Chula Vista. The traffic analyses have been prepared in accordance with the City of Chula Vista Transportation Study Guidelines (TSG), January 2022 (City’s TSG) and coordination with the City’s Development Services Department. The Project Information Form (PIF) approved on April 4, 2014 is included in Appendix A.

1.1 Project Location
The Project’s area is generally bounded by G Street to the north, H Street to the south, Bay Boulevard to the east, and Marina Parkway to the west. The Project has been further separated into three planning areas in the following list:
 Planning Area A
 Planning Area B-1
 Planning Area B-2
Figure 1-1 shows the location of the planning areas within the Specific Plan boundaries.

1.2 Project Description
The Project consists of a combination of a project- and programmatic-level analyses. The project-level analysis would be completed for the uses in Planning Area B-1. The programmatic-level analysis would be completed for the uses in Planning Areas A and B-2. Due to the uncertainty of the specific uses for Planning Areas A and B-2, the most probable and maximum intensity land uses were assumed for those areas (i.e., industrial uses that include commercial land uses). Additional details are provided in the Trip Generation section below. It should be noted that “t he Project” refers to the project-level analysis of Planning Area B-1 and “the Total Pr oject” refers to the programmatic-l evel analysis of Planning Areas A and B-2 and includes traffic from Planning Area B-1.

According to the City’s General Plan, the Project is in an Industrial zone and located within the Bayfront Local Coastal Program. The City’s Bayfront Loca l Coastal Program land use maps confirm that the Project’s land use is Industrial – General, which pr ovides for large-scale and more intensive industrial uses. As a result, the Project is consistent with th e latest City planning documents and the study area would be limited to a 1-mile radius of the Project, subject to City concurrence.

Access for Planning Area B-1 will be provided off G Str eet. Access for Planning Area B-2 will be provided off H Street. Access for Planning Area A will be provided off G Street and H Street. The Project of Planning Area B-1 is estimated to be constructed and in operation by 2026. No timeline has been developed for the construction of the Project of Planning Areas A and B-2 at this time. Figure 1-2 illustrates the Project site plan.
1 EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV

EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV
H ST

PRIVATE

LAGOON DR

MARINA PKWY
G ST

BAY BLVD
RIDA
INTERSTATE 5
SDG&E
NOT A
PART
MARINA
PKWY
G ST
SHEET OF 1

ROHR/WOHL BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN

PLANNING AREAS
AUGUST 9, 2022
1 PLANNING AREA B-1
PLANNING AREA B-2

PLANNING AREA A
COLLINS - "PARCEL C"

NOT A PART
SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY ~

44.78 ACRES
PA A 9.29 AC.

PA B-1 26.13 AC.

PA B-2 9.36 AC.
* * * CLOSING ESCROW FROM
COLLINS TO PW WOHL 10/31/22

NOT A PART
Figure 1-1
Planning Areas
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
2 s
:..-~~ _. -L PSI

PSIPWOHL
~ :::;
PWWOHL cl (.)
s
ZUTA

IC CONSUL
Figure 1-2
Project Site Plan
/g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54/g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54 /g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54/g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54 /g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54/g39/g58/g58 /g43/g51/g54 T
T
T
T
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
EV
CS
103
TYP.
112
107
TYP.
107
109
106
106
106
106
111
26'-0"
26'-0"
109
109109
TYP.
110
CLEAR HEIGHT: 32'-0"
FOOTPRINT: 80,317 SF
OFFICE: 5,202 SF
MEZZANINE: 5,202 SF

INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING 1

H STREET

G STREET
125'-0"
185'-0"
60'-0"
130'-0"
60'-0"26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"26'-0"26'-0"
26'-0"
130'-0"
60'-0" 60'-0"
TYP.
19'-0"

CITY PUMP STATION

SDG&E SUBSTATION
35'-9"
60'-0"60'-0"
39'-0"
TYP.
54'-0"
60'-0"60'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0"
65'-0" 60'-0" 49'-0"
40'-0"
35'-9" 39'-0" 39'-0" 39'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 39'-0" 39'-0" 39'-0" 39'-0" 35'-9" 35'-9" 50'-0" 50'-0" 25'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 45'-0" TYP.
52'-0"
TYP.
52'-0"
CLEAR HEIGHT: 32'-0"
FOOTPRINT: 103,871 SF
OFFICE: 8,320 SF
MEZZANINE: 8,320 SF

INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING 2
CLEAR HEIGHT: 32'-0"
FOOTPRINT: 108,917 SF
OFFICE: 5,196 SF
MEZZANINE: 5,196 SF

INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING 3
CLEAR HEIGHT: 32'-0"
FOOTPRINT: 173,384 SF
OFFICE: 8,114 SF
MEZZANINE: 8,114 SF

INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING 4
105
TYP.
120
TYP.
121
TYP.
122
125
TYP.
124
125125
125
127
127
127
127
127 128128 128
OFFICE: 2,601 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,601 SF
OFFICE: 2,601 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,601 SF
OFFICE: 2,080 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,080 SF
OFFICE: 2,080 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,080 SF
OFFICE: 2,080 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,080 SF
OFFICE: 2,080 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,080 SF
OFFICE: 2,598 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,598 SF
OFFICE: 2,598 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,598 SF
OFFICE: 2,028 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,028 SF
OFFICE: 2,029 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,029 SF
OFFICE: 2,029 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,029 SF
OFFICE: 2,028 SF
MEZZANINE: 2,028 SF
101
101
101
101
101101
101 101
101
101
101
101

C A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC AV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CAV CA VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A VC A V 37,618 SF37,497 SF
25,136 SF
22,640 SF
22,639 SF
25,136 SF51,772 SF 51,949 SF
39,491 SF 39,819 SF 33,660 SF 52,300 SF
6 103
159 191
247 279
315 341
347
351
358
TYP.
123
362
372
382
392
402
412
422
432
442
447
TYP.
108
455
465
475
485
493
502512522532542552562572582
592
602
610
620
630
639
644 654 662 669 677 687 697 699707 717 727 737 744 754 764 772 109
1,257' - 4"
27' - 4"
923' - 3"
169' - 11"
150' - 0"
278' - 3"
30' - 0"
19' - 11"
20' - 0"
1,270' - 9"
1,274' - 1"
129
129
129129

3.28 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

3.39 ACRES
.40 ACRES
TYP.
107107

FIRE LANE (HATCHED)
POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE.

WALLPACK LIGHT FIXTURE.
1 PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL

DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR

GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR

FIRE HYDRANT
P.I.V. WITH TAMPER
TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION

BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE.

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREA.

PROPERTY LINE.

FUTURE USE PARKING STALLS - NOT INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT PA-B2 PARCELS
/g22/g28/g20/g20/g3/g54/g82/g85/g85/g72/g81/g87/g82/g3/g57/g68/g79/g79/g72/g92/g3/g37/g79/g89/g71/g15/g3/g54/g88/g76/g87/g72/g3/g6/g20/g21/g19 /g54/g68/g81/g3/g39/g76/g72/g74/g82/g15/g3/g38/g36/g15/g3/g28/g21/g20/g21/g20 /g51/g3/g27/g24/g27/g17/g25/g22/g27/g17/g26/g21/g26/g26/g3/g3/g3 JOB NO.:

DRAWN BY.:

PA/PM:

SHEET
/g58/g46/g43/g57/g43/g176/g42/g56/g39/g61/g47/g52/g45/g57/g176/g39/g52/g42/g176/g57/g54/g43/g41/g47/g44/g47/g41/g39/g58/g47/g53/g52/g57/g176/g39/g56/g43/g176/g58/g46/g43/g176/g54/g56/g53/g54/g43/g56/g58/g63/g176/g39/g52/g42/g176/g41/g53/g54/g63/g56/g47/g45/g46/g58/g176/g53/g44/g176/g61/g39/g56/g43/g176/g51/g39/g50/g41/g53/g51/g40/g176/g39/g52/g42/g176/g57/g46/g39/g50/g50/g176/g52/g53/g58/g176/g40/g43/g176/g59/g57/g43/g42/g176/g53/g52/g176/g39/g52/g63/g176/g53/g58/g46/g43/g56/g176/g61/g53/g56/g49/g176/g43/g62/g41/g43/g54/g58/g176/g40/g63/g176/g39/g45/g56/g43/g43/g51/g43/g52/g58/g176/g61/g47/g58/g46/g176/g61/g39/g56/g43/g176/g51/g39/g50/g41/g53/g51/g40/g20/g176/g61/g56/g47/g58/g58/g43/g52/g176/g42/g47/g51/g43/g52/g57/g47/g53/g52/g57/g176/g57/g46/g39/g50/g50/g176/g58/g39/g49/g43/g176/g54/g56/g43/g41/g43/g42/g43/g52/g41/g43/g176/g53/g60/g43/g56/g176/g57/g41/g39/g50/g43/g42/g176/g42/g47/g51/g43/g52/g57/g47/g53/g52/g57/g176/g39/g52/g42/g176/g57/g46/g39/g50/g50/g176/g40/g43/g176/g60/g43/g56/g47/g44/g47/g43/g42/g176/g53/g52/g176/g58/g46/g43/g176/g48/g53/g40/g176/g57/g47/g58/g43/g20/g176/g39/g52/g63/g176/g42/g47/g57/g41/g56/g43/g54/g39/g52/g41/g63/g176/g57/g46/g39/g50/g50/g176/g40/g43/g176/g40/g56/g53/g59/g45/g46/g58/g176/g58/g53/g176/g58/g46/g43/g176/g52/g53/g58/g47/g41/g43/g176/g53/g44/g176/g61/g39/g56/g43/g176/g51/g39/g50/g41/g53/g51/g40/g176/g54/g56/g47/g53/g56/g176/g58/g53/g176/g58/g46/g43/g176/g41/g53/g51/g51/g43/g52/g41/g43/g51/g43/g52/g58/g176/g53/g44/g176/g39/g52/g63/g176/g61/g53/g56/g49 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT Autodesk Docs://SDG23-0036-00_Yards at the Bay - Parcel B/0036_A.rvt 6/30/2023 12:55:22 PM
M. CABRERA
N.R.

SDG23-0036-00

SITE PLAN
A100YARDS AT THE BAY

MARINA PARKWAY & H STREET, CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
30/06/2023 - ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
/g19 /g22/g19/g10 /g25/g19/g10/g20/g24/g19/g10 /g22/g19/g19/g10 /g20/g5/g32/g25/g19/g10
NOTE: IF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DETERMINES NON-COMPLIANCE WITH ANY

ACCESSIBILITY PROVISIONS, HE/SHE SHALL REQUIRE COMPLETE, DETAILED PLANS

CLEARLY SHOWING ALL EXISTING, NON COMPLYING CONDITIONS AND THE PROPSED

MODIFICATIONS TO MEET CURRENT ACCESSIBILITY PROVISIONS AFFECTED BY THE REMODEL (INCLUDING SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLANS, DETAILS, ETC.). THE PLANS MUST BE

STAMPED BY THE FIELD INSPECTOR AND RE-SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION.
"I AM THE DESIGNER/OWNER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THIS TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; I HAVE INSPECTED THE SITE/PREMISES AND DETERMINED

THAT EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT SITE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY LAW" SIGNATURE:____________________________________
PRINT NAME:____________________________________
DATE:__________________________________________

DATEREMARKS
06/30/2023DESIGNREVIEWSUBMITTAL
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" 1SITE PLAN N
101 LINE DENOTES EXISTING PROPERTY LINE.
103 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL.1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. 105 ACCESSIBLE ENTRY SIGNAGE.
106 FIRE LANE ENTRY SIGNAGE.
107 PAINTED PARKING STALL STRIPING PER CITY STANDARDS.
108 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH SIGNAGE. MAXIMUM SLOPE OF PARKING

SURFACE AT ACCESSIBLE SPACE AND ADJACENT ACCESS AISLE, IN ANY DIRECTION, TO BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1:48. PER SECTION 11B-502.7.2. 109 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH SIGNAGE. MAXIMUM SLOPE OF

PARKING SURFACE AT ACCESSIBLE SPACE AND ADJACENT ACCESS AISLE, IN ANY DIRECTION, TO BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1:48. PER SECTION 11B-502.7.2.
110 ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED BY A

REFLECTORIZED SIGN, PERMANENTLY POSTED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM EACH SPACE.
111 FIRE LANE (MINIMUM OF 26'-0" IN WIDTH AND WITH UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 13'-6" THROUGHOUT).
112 FULLY ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE WITH ACCESSIBLE ENTRY SIGNAGE.
120 TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY STANDARDS, REFER TO SHEET A810. 121 AMENITY AREA.
122 CANOPY ABOVE.
123 EVCS PARKING STALL PER CAL GREEN TABLE 5.106.5.3.3 AND PER TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1 REQUIREMENTS.
124 A CCESSIBLE EVCS PARKING STALL PER CAL GREEN TABLE 5.106.5.3.3 AND PER TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1 REQUIREMENTS.
125 VAN ACCESSIBLE EVCS PARKING ST ALL PER CAL GREEN TABLE 5.106.5.3.3 AND PER TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1 REQUIREMENTS.
127 PROPOSED GATE LOCATION.
128 SDG&E EASEMENT (NOTHING IS CONSTRUCTED EAST OF THIS EASEMENT - PARKING LAYOUT EAST OF THIS EASEMENT IS ONLY PAINTED STRIPING). 129 TRANSFORMER LOCATION.

SEE SHEET A010 FOR GENERAL NOTES
KEYNOTES:

LEGEND
Approximate location of proposed Bayshore Bikeway Segment 6B Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
3 EB

IC CONSUL
D
D
~
0 ►
0 • -
D
□

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
2 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
This section summarizes the analysis approach and methodology used to evaluate the study intersections associated with the Project. It should be noted that the approach was based on the guidelines outlined in the City’s TSG.

2.1 Study Area
This LMA addresses potential operational deficiencies that could result from the addition of the project traffic to the local circulation system. According to the City’s TSG, a LMA should be prepared for projects generating more than 200 daily trips provided it is consistent with relevant City planning documents.

Table 2-1 summarizes the intersections that were identifi ed for evaluation. The specific intersections within the study area were developed by coordination with City staff and considered key intersections based on the projected traffic generation and distribu tion. Additional details on the development of the study are contained in the proposed near-term study area technical memorandum, which can be found in Appendix B. It should be noted that after the approval of the key study area intersections, the Marina Parkway & G Street intersection (Int. #10) was remove d from the analysis. This location fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis per the City’s TSG.

Figure 2-1 illustrates the study intersections located within the study area for the Project.

2.2 Analysis Scenarios
The following scenarios were evaluated as part of the project:

 Existing Conditions: This scenario represents the conditions on the ground at the time the traffic volume data was obtained (January/February 2023).  Existing Plus Project Conditions: This scenar io represents the conditions of the study area intersections with the Project traffic. The purpos e of this scenario is to isolate the Project’s effects and does not rely on other capacity improvements by other projects.  Existing Plus Total Project Conditions: This scen ario represents the conditions of the study area with the addition of the Total Project traffic. The purpose of this scenario is to provide more flexibility for the development within Planning Areas A and B-2 or the potential to accommodate at least a partial development of Planning Areas A and B-2 before the completion of the Year 2050 roadway network.
 Opening Year 2026 No Project Conditions: This scenario represents the opening day conditions in 2026 with the addition of an ambient growth and cumulative projects added to Existing Conditions.
 Opening Year 2026 With Project Conditions: This scenario represents the expected 2026 conditions with the addition of Project traffic.
 Opening Year 2026 With Total Project Conditions: This scenario represents the expected 2026 conditions with the addition of the Total Project traffic. 4 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

The traditional weekday peak-hour coinciding with the highest volume of traffic between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM was evaluated for each analysis scenario.

Table 2-1
Study Intersections
# Intersection Traffic Control1
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal
4 Broadway & E St Signal
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC
9 Broadway & F St Signal
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC2
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal
17 Broadway & H St Signal
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy OWSC
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AWSC
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC
25 Broadway & J St Signal
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal
Notes:

1. AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

2. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5 H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Oaklawn AveWoodlawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
Figure 2-1
Study Intersections
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
6 ZUTA

IC CONSUL

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

2.3 Methodology

2.3.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Signalized and unsignalized intersection operat ions were analyzed with Synchro 11 software (Trafficware), using the methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition (HCM6) . The HCM methodology calculates delay, which corresponds to a particular LOS, to describe the overall operation of an intersection. Delay is a measure of driver and/or passenger discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time.

Signal timing data and parameters such as cycle leng ths, splits, clearance interv als, etc. were based on existing City of Chula Vista and Caltrans timing plans that are currently implemented in the field and were calibrated into the Synchro model. Appendix C contains a copy of the signal timing plans.

LOS for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. At a one-way or two-way stop control intersection, the delay reported represents the worst movement, which is typically th e left-turns from the minor street approach. The criteria for the LOS grade designations are provided in Table 2-2.

Within the City of Chula Vista, the threshold for acceptable operating conditions for signalized and unsignalized intersections is LOS D or better.

Table 2-2
LOS Criteria for Intersections
LOS
LOS Criteria (sec/veh)
Description
Signalized
Intersections
Unsignalized
Intersections
A <10 <10 EXCELLENT. Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop.

B >10 and <20 >10 and <15 VERY GOOD. Operations with good progression but with some restricted movements.

C >20 and <35 >15 and <25
GOOD. Operations where a significant number of
vehicles are stopping with some backup and light
congestion.

D >35 and <55 >25 and <35
FAIR. Operations where congestion is noticeable,
longer delays occur, and many vehicles stop. The
proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.

E >55 and <80 >35 and <50 POOR. Operations where there is significant delay, extensive queuing, and poor progression.

F >80 >50
FAILURE. Operations that are unacceptable to
most drivers, when the arrival rates exceed the
capacity of the intersection.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition
7 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

2.4 Improvement Thresholds
Table 2-3 indicates the thresholds for determining a proj ect’s substantial traffic effect on vehicular intersections. A project should consider feasible improvements to accommodate the addition of the proposed project’s vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycl e traffic, and both the tr ansit access and increased demand for transit services and facilities.

Table 2-3
Transportation Improvement Thresholds
Facility Facility Type Substantial Traffic Effect
Signal
Whole intersection
Proposed project contributes to an intersection
that currently operates or is projected to operate at
LOS E or below.

Proposed project causes an intersection’s
operations to degrade to LOS E or below.

Turning Movement
Proposed project traffic either contributes to or is
responsible for the 95
th percentile queue length
exceeding available storage length.

Freeway Interchange Freeway Off-Ramp
Proposed project traffic either contributes to or is
responsible for the 95
th percentile queue length
exceeding available off-ramp storage length and
extending onto the freeway mainline
All-Way Stop
Control Whole intersection
Proposed project contributes to an intersection
that currently operates, or is projected to operate,
at LOS E or below.

Proposed project causes the intersection’s
operations to LOS E or below during one or more
peak hours.

Side-Street Stop
Control Critical Movement
Proposed project contributes to a critical
movement of an intersection that currently
operates, or is projected to operate at LOS E, or
below.

Proposed project causes the intersections critical
movement to degrade to LOS E or below.

Pedestrian All facilities within a project study area.

Bicycle All facilities within a project study area.

Transit All facilities within a project study area.

Source: City of Chula Vista Transportation Study Guidelines, Table 3

8 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 2-4 summarizes the recommended improvements that a project could implement if a project is considered to have a substantial vehicular traffic effect.

Table 2-4
Recommended Improvements
Intersection
Type
Location
Type Potential Improvements (Project Responsibility)1, 2 Project Added peak-hour
trips8 0% - 4% 5% - 19%3 20%+4
Signal
Whole
Intersection
Signal Retiming
(100%)5
Signal
Retiming
(Fair share)5
Signal
Upgrade/ITS
(Fair share)6
Signal
Retiming
(100%)5
Signal
Upgrade/ITS
(100%)6
Turning
Movement None
Add
additional
turn lane
(Fair share)
7 Extend
existing turn
pocket
(Fair share)7
Add
additional
turn lane
(100%)7
Extend
existing turn
pocket
(100%)7
All-Way Stop Control None Coordinate with City staff to evaluate alternative control, including signalization, roundabout, turn restriction,
additional turn lanes Side-Street Stop Control None
Notes:

Source: City of Chula Vista Transportation Study Guidelines, Table 4

1. All projects are expected to pay applicable impact fees in addition to implementing the project specific improvements.

2. Certain improvements may not be feasible due to constraints; alternative improvements can be considered with the approval of the City Engineer.

3. Project that contributes between 5% and 19% of the overall intersection peak hour traffic volumes can make fair share contributions toward the costs of the improvement, in addition to paying applicable impact fees.

4. Project that contributes 20% or more peak hour traffic volumes to an intersection is required to pay 100% of the improvement costs.

5. Project is expected to pay 100% of all signal retiming cost.

6. Signal upgrade/Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements should be consistent with the City of Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan and recommendations from City staff. Project’s applicant should coordinate with City staff to identify feasible signal upgrade/ITS improvements.

7. Coordinate with City staff to determine the appropriate improvement measure. Refer to the City of Chula Vista Design and Construction Standard Drawings for turn pocket requirements.

8. Project added peak hour trips is relative to pre-existing pre-project peak hour trips.

9 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
3 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes the existing roadway network, peak hour traffic volumes, and operations at the study area intersections.

3.1 Roadway Network
E Street is classified as an east-west 4-lane Class I Colle ctor roadway west of I-5, a 4-lane gateway street between I-5 and Broadway, and a 4-lane urban arterial east of Broadway. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. On-street pa rking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph).

F Street is classified as an east-west 4-lane Downto wn Promenade between I-5 and Broadway and a 2- Downtown Promenade east of Broadway. Sidewalks ar e provided on both sides of the roadway. On- street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

G Street is currently functioning as an east-west 2-lane roadway from Marina Parkway to approximately 350 feet west of Bay Boulevard, which widens to a 4-lane roadway to Bay Boulevard. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway on the 4-lane section. There are no posted speed limits in the area.

H Street i s c l a s s i f i e d a s a n e a s t - w e s t 4 - l a n e m a j o r street between Marina Parkway and Street A and transitions to a 5-lane major street until the I-5 interchange. However, the road way is currently not built to its ultimate classification and functions as a 3-lane roadway with two travel lanes in the westbound direction, one travel lane in the eastbound direction, and a center two-way left-turn lane. urban arterial in the immediate vicinity of the Proj ect with two travel lanes provided in each direction. Sidewalks are provided on the north side of the roadway. On-street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway.

There are no posted speed limits in the area.

J Street is classified as an east-west 4-lane major ro adway east of the I-5 interchange. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. On-street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway.

The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

L Street is classified as an east-west 4-lane gateway street between the I-5 interchange and Broadway and a 4-lane Class I Collector roadway east of Broa dway. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. On-street parking is prohibited on both si des of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph.

Marina Parkway is classified as a north-south 4-lane major street between the I-5 interchange and H Street. Marina Parkway transitions into J Street east of the I-5 interchange. There are intermittent sidewalks provided on both sides of the roadway. On -street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph.

10 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Bay Boulevard is classified as a 2-lane Class II Collector from E Street to F Street and transitions to a 2- lane Class III Collector from F Street to J Street. Side walks are provided on the west side of the roadway.

On-street parking is prohibited on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph.

Figure 3-1 illustrates the existing geometrics at the study area intersections.

3.2 Multi-Modal Analysis
In addition to the vehicular roadway network, alternat ive modes of travel such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit are provided within the study area and descri bed in more detail below. References were made with the City’s Active Transportation Plan, May 12, 2020 (City’s ATP). Appendix D contains excerpts for the multi-modal analysis.

3.2.1 Pedestrian Access
The pedestrian analysis consists of documenting the existing pedestrian facilities and/or deficiencies in the study area. Deficiencies could include missing sidewalk sections, curb ramps, major obstructions, and slopes.

The roadway segments in the immediate study area a nd located west of I-5 gene rally have sidewalks on one or both sides of the roadway except for the following locations:

 Lagoon Drive: Last 600 feet prior to turning into Marina Parkway  Marina Parkway: Between Lagoon Drive and H Street
 G Street: Between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard

Pedestrians can walk along the west side of Bay Bo ulevard and cross the respective cross streets of F Street and H Street within the marked crosswalks. North of F Street, pedestrians would walk along the east side of Bay Boulevard until E Street. All curb ramps at the Bay Boulevard & H Street intersection have detectible warning strips. The other intersections along Bay Bo ulevard do not have detectible warning strips.

11 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

North / South & East / West
1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 7 Bay Blvd & F St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 3-1
Existing Intersection Geometrics
OVL
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
OVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
12 • • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., oy +-
e • 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 0 • 4 • --+- --+- ~ ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ ~
~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr 4 .J. 0
~
--+-
~tr --+- ~ y ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-y --+---+-
• • ~-
N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

ANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woo
dlawn Ave
Br
oadway
5th Ave
4t
h Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woo
dlawn Ave
Oa
klawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder
Point Dr
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 3-1a
Existing Intersection Geometrics
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
13 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~
~~
~
~~
~
'f" 'f" • 'f" 'f" e
.J. ~tt,,- • .J. 0 • _.
~t.-
_.
.J. T ~~ _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f" e •
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

3.2.2 Bicycle Access
The bicycle analysis consists of do cumenting the existing bicycle facili ties and/or deficiencies in the study area. Deficiencies could incl ude bike lane gaps or obstructions from the project access along the study roadways.

Within the study area, there is a Class I bicycle path along the south side of H Street between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard and connects with the exis ting Bayshore Bikeway. Within the study area, there is a Class II bicycle lane on both sides of Bay Boulevard between E Street and L Street, both sides of F Street between Marina Parkway and I-5, and both sides of Marina Parkway between F Street and J Street.

According to the City’s ATP, there are three bicycle projects that are shown in the top 10 bicycle projects list within the study area. These projects include the following:

 H Street between Bay Boulevard and Third Avenue (Rank 1): Construct a multi-use path on both sides of the roadway.
 Bay Boulevard between E Street and H Street (Rank 6): Construct a multi-use path.  F Street between Bay Boulevard and Third Avenue (Rank 7): Construct a multi-use path.

The Bayshore Bikeway segment between Lagoon Drive and H Street (referenced as Segment 6B in the City’s ATP) is proposed to be located along the abandoned rail line between Planning Area A and B-1/B-2.

The proposed cross section for this segment is 14-feet in width that includes a 5-foot shared use path and a 2-foot shoulder in each direction. It should be noted that project construction, including subsequent phases of the project, will not obstruct the future construction of the proposed Bayshore Bikeway segment.

3.2.3 Transit Service
The transit analysis consists of identifying the closest transit routes and stops to the project.

There are no transit stops located west of I-5. Th e Metropolitan Transit Serv ice (MTS) provides transit service to the E Street and H Street trolley stops with R o u t e s 7 0 1 , 7 0 4 , 7 0 5 , 7 0 9 , a n d 9 3 2 . R o u t e 7 0 1 provides daily service between the H Street Tran sit Center and Palomar Street Transit Center.

Headways are approximately 20 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

Route 704 provides daily service between the E Street Transit Center and Palomar Street Transit Center.

Headways are approximately 30 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

Route 705 provides service on Monday through Saturday between the E Street Transit Center and Southwestern College. Headways are approximately 30 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

Route 709 provides daily service between the H Str eet Transit Center and Eastlake. Headways are approximately 30 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

14 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Route 932 provides daily service between the 8 th Street Transit Center and Iris Avenue Transit Center with stops at the E Street Transit Center. Headways are approximately 20 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

The nearest transit stops (Routes 701 and 709) to the Project are located at the H Street Transit Center and approximately a 1,000-foot walk to/from the Project.

The immediate intersections near the E and H Street Transit Centers would be affected by the at-grade trolley crossings. According to the analysis contained in the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Traffic Study , delays at the intersections affected by the trolle y crossings would be increased between 17 and 40 seconds per vehicle and result in a drop in LOS grade.

3.3 Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes were obtained on January 25, 2023 and February 23, 2023. Figure 3-2 illustrates the study area traffic volumes.

Appendix E contains a copy of the traffic volume data sheets.

3.4 Intersection Analysis
Table 3-2 summarizes the LOS analysis results for the study area intersections under Existing Conditions.

As shown in the table, all intersections operate at LOS D or better during the weekday peak-hours except for the following:

 I-5 Southbound Ramps & E Street (LOS F – PM Peak)
 I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)
 Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

Appendix F contains the intersection LOS worksheets.

15 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 3-1
Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Conditions
Delay1 LOS2
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal AM 10.2 B
PM 25.3 C
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 51.5 D
PM 14.8 B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal AM 11.4 B
PM 13.3 B
4 Broadway & E St Signal AM 42.0 D
PM 46.7 D
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal AM 17.6 B
PM 15.4 B
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal AM 39.3 D
PM 39.9 D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 9.9 A
PM 15.5 C
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC AM 9.0 A
PM 10.2 B
9 Broadway & F St Signal AM 41.3 D
PM 43.2 D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC AM n/a4 PM
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 10.2 B
PM 0.0 A
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 24.1 C
PM 30.1 C
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal AM 30.2 C
PM 47.9 D
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 10.4 B
PM 11.8 B
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal AM 18.5 B
PM 15.7 B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal AM 30.4 C
PM 26.6 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis. 16 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 3-1
Existing Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.)
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Conditions
Delay1 LOS2
17 Broadway & H St Signal AM 31.2 C
PM 32.9 C
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal AM 42.6 D
PM 19.0 B
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.4 D
PM 37.9 D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy OWSC AM 9.6 A
PM 10.8 B
21 Bay Blvd & J St3 AWSC AM 25.6 D
PM 11.1 B
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.5 D
PM 93.1 F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 27.2 C
PM 17.4 B
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC AM 16.7 C
PM 15.1 C
25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 45.0 D
PM 46.9 D
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 10.9 B
PM 139.3 F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal AM 11.9 B
PM 42.6 D
Notes:

OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. The intersection could not be analyzed since the intersection was completely blocked off on the day of the counts.

17 xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U XS T UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb bbb
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
/
/
/
303 / 369
31 / 36 / 64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
18 / 20 329 / 409 665 / 677 395 / 315
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
234 / 276
318 / 423
54 / 60
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 244 / 255
8 / 47
4 / 11
/
172 / 322
302 / 678
12 / 15
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 / 41 / 86 82 / 244
365 / 3
459 / 346
643 / 907
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
72 / 50
62 / 81
17 / 11
72 / 72
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
353 / 433
139 / 145
20 / 34 120 / 108 63 / 83 /
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
404 / 425 384 / 351 18 / 5 141 / 145
206 / 10
39 / 284
149 / 301
22 / 19
/
85 / 102
73 / 33 78 / 84 9 / 187 28 / 31
344 / 493
34 / 21
93 / 81
29 / 39
260 / 398
121 / 108
/
/
30 / 35 67 / 87 9 / 32 /
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
80 / 24
50 / 34
47 / 45
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
/
1 / 1
41 / 34
189 / 344
/
53 / 83 / / 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
1 / 1 / 67 / 17
113 / 156 1 / 1 / 61 / 51
0 / 0
110 / 417
/
28 / 40
46 / 224
35 / 156
48 / 49 1 / 1 1 / 0 /
123 / 155
37 / 89
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 3-2
Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
38 / 158
1 / 1
72 / 25
21 / 32136 / 190 / 0 / 0 2 / 4
/
/ /
1 / 0
152 / 62
/
n/a
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
18 xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
51 / 35
3 / 1
295 / 376
/
/
/
/
257 / 367 / 17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
110 / 51 302 / 397 477 / 770 450 / 698
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
/ 35 / 135 65 / 90 19 / 31
61 / 221
/
/
/ 322 / 467
67 / 15
12 / 3
21 / 1333 / 130 / 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
640 / 652
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
79 / 109
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
681 / 704
20 / 10
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 /
324 / 516 560 / 706 490 / 618 31 / 45
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
/
/
/
124 / 119 77 / 39 164 / 136 /
437 / 422
115 / 219
524 / 453
157 / 164
536 / 529
20 / 60
/
37 / 3586 / 185 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
406 / 531
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
7 / 14
62 / 157
10 / 118
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
37 / 28
36 / 98
4 / 13
362 / 70 222 / 274 / 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
/ 447 / 360 7 / 15
96 / 123 284 / 144 415 / 351 514 / 531
/
/
/
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
4 / 9 / 101 / 130 42 / 29
74 / 187
21 / 21
82 / 30
288 / 101
356 / 307
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 3-2a
Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
579 / 663
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1415 / 33 35 / 121 / 14 / 34
/
/ 531 / 658
102 / 64
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
19 xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY da Z Yc c ccb b b b
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 3-2b
Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/ / / /
33 34 35 36
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
50 / 180
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ 50 / 180
/
/
/
/ / / /
1 / 0
/
/
/ 1 / 0
/
/ / / /
29 30 31 32
/ / /
1 / 0 1 / 0 90 / 92 90 / 92
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1 / 0
/
/
/
252 / 184 / 119 / 321 /
122 / 39
183 / 783
74 / 549
157 / 67
16 / 5
168 / 232
113 / 125 / 34 / 4 /
407 / 382
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
/
/
88 / 255 /
25 26 27 28
151 / 53 2 / 8 /
272 / 327 / 162 / 339 1 / 0
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
/
/
/
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
/
121 / 134
87 / 91
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357
Does not exist
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
Does not exist Does not exist Does not exist Does not exist 20 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
4 PROJECT-LEVEL PROJECT TRAFFIC
This section describes the estimated trip generation, trip distribution, and assignment of trips associated with the Project-Level analysis to the adjacent roadway network.

4.1 Trip Generation
Trip generation rates published by the SANDAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Tr affic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 were applied to the existing and proposed uses on site to estimate the traffic generation characteristics of the site. The trip ge neration was estimated for the AM and PM peak-hour and daily traffic. It should be noted that the trips associated with the industri al use have been separated into passenger cars and trucks and converted to pass enger car equivalents (PCE) for analysis purposes.

Passby and internal capture trips were not accounted for as a conservative estimate.

The trip generation was also estimated for the existing uses on site. The existing trips were subtracted from the proposed trips to determine the net trip generation for the Project. Table 4-1 summarizes the proposed trip generation for the Project located in Planning Area B-2.

As shown in the table, the Project is estimated to generate a subtotal of 7,52 0 daily trips with 903 AM peak-hour trips and 903 PM peak-hour trips and a total of 8,501 daily trips with 1,065 AM peak-hour trips and 1,065 PM peak-hour trips with the PCE adjust ments. After applying the existing trip credits, the Project is estimated to generate a net total of 5,115 daily trips with 446 AM peak-hour trips and 442 PM peak-hour trips and a net total of 6,096 daily trips with 608 AM peak-hour trips and 584 PM peak- hour trips with the PCE adjustments.

21 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 4-1
Project Trip Generation
TRIP GENERATION RATES1
Land Use Weekday Daily

AM PEAK PM PEAK
% ADT In:Out Ratio % ADT In:Out Ratio
Industrial/Business Park (w/commercial) 16 trips / ksf 12% 0.80 : 0.20 12% 0.20 : 0.80 Manufacturing/Assembly 4 trips / ks f 19% 0.90 : 0.10 20% 0.20 : 0.80 Quality Restaurant 100 tri ps / ks f 1% 0.60 : 0.40 8% 0.70 : 0.30

TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
Land Use
Planning
Area Amount ADT

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Uses
Manufacturing/Assembly B-1 601.225 ksf 2,405 412 45 457 97 384 481 Existing Trips 2,405 412 45 45 7 9 7 384 481
Proposed Uses
Project-Level Analysis
Industrial/Business Park (w/commercial) B-1 470.000 ksf 7,520 723 180 903 181 722 903 Passenger Cars (83.1% Daily, 88.2% AM, 88.2% PM): 6,884 638 159 797 160 637 797 Trucks (16.9% Daily, 11.8% AM, 11.8% PM)2: 636 85 21 106 21 85 106 2-axle (16.7%, PCE = 1.5)3, 4: 160 21 5 26 5 21 26
3-axle (20.7%, PCE = 2)3, 4: 264 35 9 44 9 35 44
4+ axle (62.6%, PCE = 3)3, 4: 1,193 159 39 198 39 159 198 Subtotal (Trucks with PCE): 1,617 215 53 268 53 215 268 Subtotal: Project-Level Analysis
Total Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars and Trucks) 7,520 723 180 903 181 722 903 Total Trip Generation (Passenger Cars and Trucks with PCE) 8,501 853 212 1,065 213 852 1,065 Net: Project-Level Analysis
Total Vehicle Trip Generated (Passenger Cars and Trucks) 5,115 311 135 446 84 338 422 Total Trip Generation (Passenger Cars and Trucks with PCE) 6,096 441 167 608 116 468 584 Notes:
ksf: 1,000 sf

1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002.

2. The truck trip rates for the project’s land uses are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition for the Industrial Park land use (LUC 130).

3. The recommended truck mix percentages are based on the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage.

4. The PCE factors are based on the County of Riverside Transportation Analysis Guidelines, December 2020.

22 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment
The project trip distribution for the Project Level An alyses was primarily based on information contained in the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, March 2008 (Bayfront TIA) . This distribution was obtained through coordination with SANDAG and based on the SANDAG Series 10 Select Zone model plots of zones within the Bayfront Redevelopment Area. The SANDAG select zone distribution used on the 2008 Bayfront traffic analysis was based on an earlier generation of the four-step model, which has been superseded by the current activity-based model.

A screenline analysis was performed to determine the overall trip distribution for the Project. The following list summarizes the trip distribution:

 26 percent to/from the north
 26 percent to/from the south
 48 percent to/from the east

It should be noted that approximately 21 percent of the traffic was internal to the Bayfront development.

However, as a conservative estimate, the percentage s were proportionally adjusted to add up to 100 percent.

Figure 4-1 displays the assumed Project trip distribution through the study intersections and project driveways. Based on the Project trip generation and distribution, the Project trips were assigned to the study area. Figure 4-2 illustrates the Project trip assignment.

Appendix G contains the trip assignment figures without the PCE adjustments. 23 xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da ZYccccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWW WS TU X S TU X S T U X STU X
da ZY da ZY d a ZY da Z Yccc cbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

V V V VW WWWSTU X ST U X S TU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da ZY d aZ Yc cccbbbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
7% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
1234
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5% / (0%) 12% / (0%) 12% / (0%) 10% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (12%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (12%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (10%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 6% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5678
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
8% / (0%) 6% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 6% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
7% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%) 0% / (1%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%) 0% / (1%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (6%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
91 0 1 11 2
0% / (5%) 0% / (0%) 3% / (0%)
6% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 52% / (0%)
13% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (13%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (6%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-1
Opening Year Project Trip Distribution
0% / (52%)
14% / (0%)
3% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (6%) 0% / (14%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
6% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVWWWWS TU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d aZ Yd a Z Yd a ZY d aZYccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-1a
Opening Year Project Trip Distribution
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (5%) 0% / (2%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
2% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (5%)
5% / (0%)
12% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
21 22 23 24
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5% / (0%) 10% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 8% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (12%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
8% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
17 18 19 20
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%)
3% / (0%) 3% / (0%) 3% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (10%)
3% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (14%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (15%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (14%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (26%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (40%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (14%)
15% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
13 14 15 16
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
29% / (0%) 14% / (0%) 14% / (0%) 14% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
26% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V V VVW W WWSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a ZY d a Z Yc c ccbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (13%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 6% / (0%)
25 26 27 28
13% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
8% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 0% / (10%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (5%) 5% / (0%)
4% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
10% / (0%)
0% / (5%)
6% / (0%) 7% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
29 30 31 32
0% / (0%) 44% / (0%) 22% / (0%)
12% / (5%) 12% / (0%) 0% / (22%) 44% / (0%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (44%)
0% / (22%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 5% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5% / (12%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%)
0% / (12%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
5% / (0%) 5% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (22%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (5%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (22%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (5%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
33 34 35 36
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%) 19% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
5% / (0%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-1b
Opening Year Project Trip Distribution
0% / (19%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (10%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da ZYccccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWW WS TU X S TU X S T U X STU X
da ZY da ZY d a ZY da Z Yccc cbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

V V V VW WWWSTU X ST U X S TU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da ZY d aZ Yc cccbbbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 8 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1234
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
22 / 6 53 / 14 53 / 14 44 / 12
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 2 / 5
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
12 / 33
20 / 56
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 2 / 5
0 / 0
0 / 0
20 / 56
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
4 / 1
0 / 0 0 / 0 26 / 7 0 / 0
5678
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 9 26 / 7 0 / 0 26 / 7
0 / 0
31 / 8
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 5 2 / 5 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 / 37
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
10 / 28
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 02 / 5 2 / 5 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
12 / 33
10 / 28
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
0 / 0
10 / 28
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
91 0 1 11 2
8 / 23 0 / 0 13 / 3
26 / 7 0 / 0 0 / 0 229 / 60
111 / 28
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14
5 / 14
0 / 0 0 / 0 28 / 111 0 / 0
10 / 28
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-2
Project Trip Assignment
87 / 243
62 / 16
13 / 3
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 13 / 51 23 / 66
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
51 / 13
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVWWWWS TU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d aZ Yd a Z Yd a ZY d aZYccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-2a
Project Trip Assignment
13 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 08 / 23 3 / 9 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
13 / 37
9 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
8 / 23
22 / 6
53 / 14
0 / 0
13 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
22 / 6 44 / 12 35 / 9 35 / 9
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
20 / 56
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 013 / 37 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
5 / 14
35 / 9
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
0 / 0 0 / 0 44 / 12
13 / 3 13 / 3 13 / 3 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
13 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 66
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 025 / 70 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 66
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 43 / 122 0 / 0 0 / 0
67 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 66
66 / 17
0 / 0 0 / 0
13 14 15 16
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
128 / 34 62 / 16 62 / 16 62 / 16
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
115 / 30
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V V VVW W WWSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a ZY d a Z Yc c ccbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
7 / 19
22 / 61
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
57 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 9 0 / 0 35 / 9 21 / 85
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
13 / 510 / 0 0 / 0 8 / 23 43 / 11
18 / 5
0 / 0
13 / 37
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
85 / 21
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 375 / 94 188 / 47
113 / 69 102 / 26 47 / 187 375 / 94
11 / 43
0 / 0
93 / 375
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
68 / 113
11 / 43
0 / 0
13 / 51
25 / 102
11 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
15 / 60
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
47 / 187
0 / 0
8 / 23 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 44 / 12 162 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 4-2b
Project Trip Assignment
40 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

5.1 Roadway Network
The lane configuration and traffic controls for the Existing Plus Project conditions are consistent with Existing Conditions as shown in Figure 3-3 with the following exceptions:

 West Project Driveway & G Street (Int #28) : Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Middle Project Driveway & G Street (Int #29) : Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 East Project Driveway & G Street (Int #30): Construct south leg and stop controlled. Associated with Project.
 Main Project Driveway & H Street (Int #31): Construct north leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Employee Project Driveway & H Street (Int #32) : Construct north leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.

It should be noted that all project driveways along G Street and H Street would be full access driveways except for the Employee Project Driveway along H Str eet, which would be restricted to right-in, right- out movements only. Figure 5-1 illustrates the intersection geometri cs at the study area intersections and includes the project driveways.

30 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

North / South & East / West
1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 7 Bay Blvd & F St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 5-1
Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics
OVL
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
OVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
31 • • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., oy +-
e • 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 0 • 4 • --+- --+- ~ ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ ~
~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr 4 .J. 0
~
--+-
~tr --+- ~ y ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-y --+---+-
• • ~-
N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

ANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woo
dlawn Ave
Br
oadway
5th Ave
4t
h Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woo
dlawn Ave
Oa
klawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder
Point Dr
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 5-1a
Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
32 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~
~~
~
~~
~
'f" 'f" • 'f" 'f" e
.J. ~tt,,- • .J. 0 • _.
~t.-
_.
.J. T ~~ _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f" e •
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 5-1b
Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St
28 29
30 31
32 LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

IC CONSU

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

5.2 Traffic Volumes
The Existing Plus Project traffic volumes were determined by adding the Project traffic volumes to the existing traffic volumes. Figure 5-2 illustrates the Existing Plus Project traffic volumes.

5.3 Intersection Analysis
Table 5-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersection under Existing Plus Project conditions.

As shown in the table, all intersec tions, including the project driveway s, are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday peak-hours with th e addition of the Project traffic except for the following:

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

Appendix F contains the intersection LOS worksheets.

34 xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 5-2
Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes
125 / 401
63 / 17
85 / 28
21 / 32136 / 190 0 / 0 13 / 51 25 / 70
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
52 / 13
152 / 62
0 / 0
48 / 49 1 / 1 29 / 111 0 / 0
133 / 183
37 / 89
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
0 / 0
53 / 83 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
9 / 24 0 / 0 80 / 20
139 / 163 1 / 1 0 / 0 290 / 111
111 / 28
110 / 417
0 / 0
28 / 40
51 / 238
40 / 170
47 / 45
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
0 / 0
23 / 7
41 / 34
199 / 372
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 032 / 40 69 / 92 9 / 32 0 / 0
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
92 / 57
60 / 62
75 / 38 80 / 89 9 / 187 28 / 31
357 / 530
38 / 22
93 / 81
29 / 39
270 / 426
125 / 109
20 / 34 120 / 108 89 / 90 0 / 0
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
439 / 434 410 / 358 18 / 5 167 / 152
206 / 10
70 / 292
149 / 301
22 / 19
0 / 0
85 / 102
76 / 51
62 / 81
17 / 11
76 / 73
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
370 / 480
143 / 146
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 0 / 0 41 / 86 84 / 249
365 / 3
459 / 346
663 / 963
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 246 / 260
16 / 70
4 / 11
0 / 0
184 / 355
322 / 734
12 / 15
64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
40 / 26 382 / 423 718 / 691 439 / 327
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
238 / 277
318 / 423
54 / 60
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
62 / 44 0 / 0
28 29
30 31
32 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
n/a
35 xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 5-2a
Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes
592 / 700
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1423 / 56 38 / 130 0 / 0 14 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
544 / 695
111 / 66
3 / 2
351 / 245
4 / 9 0 / 0 101 / 130 42 / 29
82 / 210
43 / 27
135 / 44
288 / 101
369 / 344
0 / 0
362 / 70 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 447 / 360 7 / 15
118 / 129 328 / 156 450 / 360 549 / 540
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
7 / 14
82 / 213
18 / 141
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
59 / 34
53 / 145
4 / 13
0 / 0
37 / 3599 / 222 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
411 / 545
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
129 / 133 77 / 39 164 / 136 0 / 0
442 / 436
150 / 228
524 / 453
157 / 164
541 / 543
20 / 60
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 0 / 0
337 / 519 573 / 709 503 / 621 75 / 57
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
92 / 112
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
704 / 770
20 / 10
12 / 3
21 / 1358 / 200 0 / 0 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
663 / 718
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
0 / 0 78 / 257 65 / 90 19 / 31
128 / 408
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
345 / 533
133 / 32
17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
238 / 85 364 / 413 539 / 786 512 / 714
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
166 / 65
3 / 1
295 / 376
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 5-2b
Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/ / / /
33 34 35 36
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
87 / 349
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
15 / 60
87 / 349
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
69 / 113
11 / 43
0 / 0
13 / 51
26 / 102
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 375 / 94 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 137 / 279 465 / 186
11 / 43
0 / 0
93 / 375
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
0 / 0
13 / 51252 / 184 0 / 0 127 / 344 43 / 11
140 / 44
183 / 783
87 / 586
179 / 73
16 / 5
168 / 232
113 / 125 0 / 0 34 / 4 0 / 0
420 / 419
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
0 / 0
0 / 0
88 / 255 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
208 / 68 2 / 8 0 / 0
307 / 336 0 / 0 197 / 348 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
0 / 0
128 / 153
109 / 152
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
35 34
33 28
29 30
31 32
37 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 5-1
Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Conditions Existing Plus Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal AM 10.2 B 12.9 B
PM 25.3 C 29.7 C
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 51.5 D 50.5 D
PM 14.8 B 14.7 B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal AM 11.4 B 11.2 B
PM 13.3 B 13.4 B
4 Broadway & E St Signal AM 42.0 D 42.2 D
PM 46.7 D 47.3 D
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal AM 17.6 B 17.1 B
PM 15.4 B 15.0 B
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal AM 39.3 D 39.1 D
PM 39.9 D 40.0 D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 9.9 A 10.6 B
PM 15.5 C 16.4 C
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC AM 9.0 A 9.1 A
PM 10.2 B 10.5 B
9 Broadway & F St Signal AM 41.3 D 40.7 D
PM 43.2 D 42.8 D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC AM n/a4 PM
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 10.2 B 12.3 B
PM 0.0 A 15.3 C
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 24.1 C 22.8 C
PM 30.1 C 40.9 D
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal AM 30.2 C 25.6 C
PM 47.9 D 40.1 D
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 10.4 B 11.6 B
PM 11.8 B 13.6 B
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal AM 18.5 B 17.7 B
PM 15.7 B 15.4 B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal AM 30.4 C 29.8 C
PM 26.6 C 26.0 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

38 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 5-1
Existing Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Conditions Existing Plus Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
17 Broadway & H St Signal AM 31.2 C 31.7 C
PM 32.9 C 33.0 C
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal AM 42.6 D 43.6 D
PM 19.0 B 18.8 B
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.4 D 44.4 D
PM 37.9 D 37.8 D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy OWSC AM 9.6 A 9.9 A
PM 10.8 B 11.3 B
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AWSC AM 25.6 D 36.9 E
PM 11.1 B 12.6 B
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.5 D 39.2 D
PM 93.1 F 94.7 F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 27.2 C 27.5 C
PM 17.4 B 17.3 B
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC AM 16.7 C 17.7 C
PM 15.1 C 15.9 C
25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 45.0 D 45.5 D
PM 46.9 D 47.7 D
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 10.9 B 11.4 B
PM 139.3 F 148.7 F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal AM 11.9 B 12.2 B
PM 42.6 D 44.5 D
28 W Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.6 A
PM 9.3 A
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.8 A
PM 9.9 A
30 E Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.5 A
PM 9.7 A
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 13.1 B
PM 30.1 D
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 11.1 B
PM 10.2 B
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the en tire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst move ment at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

39 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

5.4 Project Fair Share
Table 5-2 summarizes the Project’s fair share of new tr affic added to the intersections that would operate at LOS E or F under the Existing Plus Project scenario. As shown in the table, the Project would contribute between 2.9 percent and 11.3 percent at the affected intersections.

Table 5-2
Existing Plus Project Fair Share
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
Traffic Volumes1
% Proj Proj Total
21 Bay Blvd & J St AM 122 1,180 10.3%
PM 114 1,005 11.3%
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM 45 1,479 3.0%
PM 42 1,440 2.9%
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM 75 916 8.2%
PM 72 1,529 4.7%
Notes:

Only intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the Project are shown in the table.

The fair share calculations are based on actual traffic volumes and do not include PCE adjustments.

5.5 Improvements
Table 5-3 summarizes the proposed improvements at the affected intersections and Figure 5-3 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections.

As shown in the table, the Project would be fully resp onsible for signal retiming at the I-5 SB Ramps & J Street intersection. The Project would contribute it s fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal at the Bay Boulevard & J Street and Bay Boulev ard & L Street intersections. It should be noted that both signal installations correspond with th e Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (BAY-28 #5 and #6). All proposed improvements would achieve LOS C or better conditions during both peak periods.

Appendix J contains the intersection LOS worksheets with the improvements.

40 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 5-3
Project Improvements
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus Proj
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
21 Bay Blvd & J St Signal AM 36.9 E 29.2 C -7.7 Signalize intersection4 Fair Share PM 12.6 B 21.5 C 8.9 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.2 D 17.0 B -22.2 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.7 F 28.8 C -65.9 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 11.4 B 6.3 A -5.1 Signalize intersection5 Fair Share PM 148.7 F 31.5 C -117.2 Notes:

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

5. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

41 111~1 I
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

Optimize Signal Timings
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
42 • • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., oy +-
e • 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 0 • 4 • --+- --+- ~ ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ ~
~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr 4 .J. 0
~
--+-
~tr --+- ~ y ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-y --+---+-
• • ~-
@ N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

ANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woo
dlawn Ave
Br
oadway
5th Ave
4t
h Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woo
dlawn Ave
Oa
klawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder
Point Dr
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 5-3a
Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Optimize Signal Timings
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
43 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~
~~
~
~~ 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~tt,,- • .J. _.
~t.-
_.
.J. T ~~ _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f"
•
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 5-3b
Existing Plus Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements 29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

Optimize Signal Timings
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
44 • • • •
•
s

IC CONSU

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
6 OPENING YEAR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section provides a summary of operations at the study area intersections anticipated with the anticipated opening of the project in the Year 2026.

6.1 Roadway Network
The lane configuration and traffic controls for the Opening Year 2026 conditions are consistent with Existing Conditions as shown in Figure 3-3 with the following exceptions:

 E Street (S) between G Street and H Street: Construct as a Class III Collector with turn lanes.

Associated with Chula Vista Bayfront Phase 1A Improvements.  G Street between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard: Improve to a 2-lane Collector. Associated with Chula Vista Bayfront Phase 1A Improvements.
 H Street between Marina Parkway and E Street (S ): Construct as a Class II Collector with turn lane. Associated with Chula Vista Bayfront Phase 1A Improvements.  F Street between Lagoon Drive and Gunpowder Point Drive: Remove this link. Associated with Sun Communities RV Park, Phase 2 development.
 Marina Way & Marina Parkway (Int #20): Reconfigure intersection and add a traffic signal.

Associated with Gaylord Hotel development.
 West Project Driveway & G Street (Int #28) : Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Middle Project Driveway & G Street (Int #29) : Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Employee Project Driveway & H Street (Int #32) : Construct north leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Marina Parkway & H Street (Int #33): Construct as a traffic signal. Associated with Gaylord Hotel development.
 Marina Parkway & Street C (Int #34): Construct as a traffic signal. Associated with Amara Bay development.
 Street A & J Street (Int #35): Construct as a traffic signal. Associated with Amara Bay development.

It should be noted that all project driveways along G Street and H Street would be full access driveways except for the Employee Project Driveway along H Str eet, which would be restricted to right-in, right- out movements only. Figure 6-1 illustrates the intersection geometric s at the study area intersections, which includes the project driveways under the Opening Year 2026 conditions.

45 1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 6-1
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics
7 Bay Blvd & F St
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

OVL
OVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
46 • • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., ey +-
• • e
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr -4• • -4• --+- --+- y ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ +-~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr -4 .J. •
~
--+-
~tr --+- y
T ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-
T --+---+-
• • ~-
N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 6-1a
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
47 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~ ~~
~
~~
~
'f" A~ • 'f" 'f" e
.J. ~tt,,- -4 .J. 0 • ~t.-
_.
.J. _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f" e •
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 6-1b
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St 33 Marina Pkwy & H St 34 Marina Pkwy & Street C 35 Street A & J St PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
48 • • • •
~ ~
~ 44-~ +-
.. ~
~
JK f'" f'" JK~~ +-
•
+- +-
_. ~
~~ t~
~ _. _. _.
~
_.
• • • •

TRAFFIC CONSULTING

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

6.2 Background Traffic
An ambient growth rate was calculated to account fo r area-wide growth not reflected by the cumulative development projects. An ambient annual growth rate of 1 percent per year was utilized for intersections east of I-5 and movements to and from the east of the interchanges. This growth rate was based on the population data compiled by the California Departme nt of Finance for Chula Vista. Historical traffic volumes were also reviewed, but indicated a negative growth. As a result, the ambient annual growth rate of 1 percent per year would be considered conservative.

Appendix H contains excerpts of the population data used to estimate the ambient annual growth rate.

6.3 Cumulative Projects
A list of reasonably foreseeable development projects that are either approved or being processed were provided by the City. Each project was mapped and revi ewed and resulted in a total of six projects that would contribute traffic to the study area network. It should be noted that the 390 Bay Blvd and 795 H St projects were under renovation at the time that ex isting counts were obtained. As such, the estimated traffic volumes for both projects were included as a cumulative project. The Collins Campus project was not at full capacity due to reductions in on-campus staffing and the additional traffic has been accounted for as a cumulative project. Table 6-1 summarizes the trip generation of each cumulative project. Figure 6-2 illustrates the locations of the cumulative projects.

As shown in the table, the total trip generation fo r the cumulative projects results in approximately 28,067 daily trips with 2,251 AM peak-hour trips and 2,699 PM peak-hour trips. The trip distribution for the cumulative projects were based on the re gional trip distribution contained in the Bayfront TIA and localized distribution based on the location of access driveways and the anticipated roadway network.

Figure 6-3 illustrates the traffic volumes of the cumulative projects in the study area.

Appendix I contains excerpts of each cumulative project.

6.4 Traffic Volumes
The Opening Year 2026 traffic volumes were estima ted by applying the ambient growth factor of 1 percent for three years to the existing traffic volu mes and adding the cumulative traffic volumes. Figure 6-4 illustrates the Opening Year 2026 Without Project traffic volumes. Figure 6-5 illustrates the Opening Year 2026 With Project traffic volumes.
49 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-1
Cumulative Project Trip Generation
TRIP GENERATION RATES1
Land Use Weekday Daily

AM PEAK PM PEAK
% ADT In:Out Ratio % ADT In:Out Ratio
Hotel 10 trips / rm 6% 0.60 : 0.40 8% 0.60 : 0.40
Mobile Home 5 tri ps / s p 8% 0.30 : 0.70 11% 0.60 : 0.40 Apartments 6 trips / du 8% 0.20 : 0.80 9% 0.70 : 0.30
Industrial Park (no commercial) 8 tri ps / ks f 11% 0.90 : 0.10 12% 0.20 : 0.80 Warehousing 5 trips / ks f 13% 0.70 : 0.30 15% 0.40 : 0.60

TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
Cumulative Projects2 Amount ADT

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In Out Total In Out Total
1 Gaylord Hotel 1,600 rm 16,000 576 384 960 768 512 1,280 2 Sun Communities RV Park, Phase II 90 s p 450 11 25 36 30 20 50 3 Amara Bay 1,500 du 9,000 144 576 720 567 243 810
4 390 Bay Blvd 60 ksf 480 48 5 53 12 46 58
5 795 H St 194.227 ks f 972 89 38 127 59 87 146
6 Collins Campus 1,165 355 0 355 0 355 355
CUMULATIVE TOTAL 28,067 1,223 1,028 2,251 1,436 1,263 2,699 Notes:
rm: rooms, sp: spaces, du: dwelling units, ksf: 1,000 square feet

1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002.

2. The cumulative projects were provided by the City of Chula Vista and located within the study area.

50 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Oaklawn AveWoodlawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
LEGEND
No changes to road
network
Network improvements
completed by Phase 1
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Figure 6-2
Location of Cumulative Projects
LEGEND
Amara Bay
390 Bay Blvd
Gaylord Hotel
Sun Communities RV Park,
Phase II
Collins Campus
795 H St
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
51 *
* * * * ZUTA

IC CONSUL
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes Cumulative Projects The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

V VVVWWWWST U X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Yd a Z Yd aZY da ZYccccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X ST U X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

V V V VW WWWSTU X S T U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y d aZY da Z Yd a Z Yc cccbbb b
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-3
Cumulative Project Traffic Volumes
360 / 356
0 / 0
118 / 17
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 23 / 70 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
72 / 37
200 / 15
0 / 0
0 / 0 16 / 20 32 / 78 0 / 0
29 / 61
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
91 0 1 11 2
16 / 20 0 / 0 143 / 20
65 / 53 0 / 0 0 / 0 375 / 574
65 / 34
17 / 211
0 / 0
17 / 23
10 / 117
12 / 141
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 31
0 / 0
23 / 31
0 / 0
29 / 61
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 188 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
14 / 37
188 / 0
18 / 55
14 / 23
0 / 0 0 / 0 8 / 156 0 / 0
31 / 38
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 38
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 25 / 28 0 / 0
5678
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
36 / 43 36 / 43 39 / 25 65 / 53
158 / 15
56 / 29
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 38
12 / 15
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 10 / 12
0 / 0
29 / 12
52 / 63
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 9 / 7 16 / 176 10 / 12
36 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
26 / 211
39 / 228
6 / 16
0 / 0 0 / 0
1234
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
23 / 40 61 / 72 61 / 72 36 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
12 / 15
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 11
177 / 25
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
7 / 28
36 / 19 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V V VVWWWWS T U XS T U XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X S TU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V V VWWWWS TU X S T U XS T U XS T U X
d aZY da Z Y da ZY d a ZYccccbbb b
214 / 304
0 / 0
2 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 14 15 16
1 / 3 0 / 0 0 / 0
303 / 289 118 / 160 119 / 163 119 / 163
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 176 / 196 0 / 0 0 / 0
216 / 216
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
128 / 128
185 / 129
0 / 0
0 / 070 / 174 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
128 / 128
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
25 / 28
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
128 / 128
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
0 / 0 0 / 0 254 / 462
57 / 91 57 / 91 49 / 57 0 / 0
9 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
356 / 273
22 / 25 0 / 0 35 / 15 0 / 0
77 / 64
36 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 0
77 / 64
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 031 / 38 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
42 / 50
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
6 / 63
5 / 54
53 / 205
0 / 0
5 / 4
54 / 7
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 2 / 6 0 / 0
188 / 503 191 / 306 133 / 153 134 / 156
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 207 / 88 0 / 0
451 / 245
94 / 174
64 / 10
0 / 1
257 / 198
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-3a
Cumulative Project Traffic Volumes
116 / 139
1 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0128 / 99 135 / 75 0 / 0 2 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
118 / 141
58 / 151
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V V VVW W W WSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc c c cbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Marina Pkwy & H St Marina Pkwy & Street C Street A & J St &

VVVVW W W WSTU X S TU X S T U XS T U X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYc c c cb bbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
42 / 50
92 / 112
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
25 26 27 28
109 / 126 0 / 0 0 / 0
134 / 156 0 / 0 109 / 126 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
116 / 139
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
49 / 57
0 / 0
92 / 112
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 392 / 597 392 / 597
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
360 / 356
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 31
57 / 72
127 / 159
0 / 0
126 / 176
22 / 85
179 / 238
360 / 356
0 / 0
29 / 113 230 / 97 0 / 0 0 / 0
33 34 35 36
86 / 36 58 / 227 0 / 0
184 / 246 0 / 0 225 / 450 0 / 0
29 / 12
0 / 0
230 / 97
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 36 0 / 0 7 / 28 0 / 0
119 / 148
86 / 115
81 / 108
115 / 49
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-3b
Cumulative Project Traffic Volumes
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 061 / 77 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
196 / 235
58 / 227
349 / 245
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
29 / 24
547 / 607
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
7 / 28
67 / 55 0 / 0 66 / 49 55 / 76
1234
568 / 403 7 / 19 92 / 91
41 / 60 390 / 481 685 / 698 407 / 325
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
241 / 284
328 / 436
56 / 62
0 / 0 159 / 320 9 / 15 251 / 263
44 / 81
4 / 11
0 / 0
198 / 533
341 / 906
18 / 31
545 / 386
48 / 675 / 16 0 / 0 42 / 89 84 / 251
365 / 3
488 / 358 662 / 934
143 / 106
4 / 2
42 / 32
74 / 52
64 / 83
18 / 11
74 / 74
626 / 615
146 / 128
116 / 50
364 / 446
143 / 149
21 / 35 124 / 111 88 / 111 0 / 0
5678
78 / 122 72 / 81 98 / 117
416 / 438 396 / 362 57 / 30 210 / 202
364 / 25
95 / 313
149 / 301
23 / 20
0 / 0
88 / 105
75 / 34 80 / 87 17 / 343 29 / 32
354 / 508
35 / 22
96 / 83
30 / 40
268 / 410
125 / 111
0 / 0
0 / 031 / 36 69 / 90 9 / 220 0 / 0
712 / 603
66 / 83
22 / 65
214 / 6
98 / 79
64 / 57
48 / 46
388 / 584
24 / 41
24 / 32
0 / 0
24 / 32
42 / 35
224 / 415
0 / 0
55 / 86 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
17 / 21 0 / 0 210 / 37
181 / 214 1 / 1 0 / 0 436 / 625
65 / 34
130 / 641
0 / 0
45 / 63
56 / 341
47 / 297
49 / 50 17 / 21 33 / 78 0 / 0
156 / 221
38 / 92
588 / 477
65 / 89
1 / 1
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-4
Opening Year 2026 Without Project Traffic Volumes
398 / 514
1 / 1
190 / 42
21 / 32140 / 196 0 / 0 23 / 70 2 / 4
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
73 / 37
357 / 79
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
265 / 339
3 / 1
297 / 378
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 18 / 20 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
326 / 454 62 / 49 34 / 48
416 / 342 429 / 569 491 / 793 464 / 719
135 / 132
7 / 8
68 / 70
36 / 31
20 / 5
22 / 24
0 / 0 211 / 331 67 / 93 20 / 32
279 / 444
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
460 / 609
252 / 144
12 / 3
22 / 13103 / 304 0 / 0 4 / 11 19 / 29
28 / 1
391 / 366
659 / 672
23 / 24
7 / 4
12 / 22
81 / 112
445 / 579
81 / 135
77 / 89
40 / 48
120 / 109
101 / 82
702 / 725
21 / 10
149 / 230 16 / 97 80 / 100 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
128 / 64 130 / 143 285 / 507
334 / 532 577 / 727 505 / 637 45 / 72
127 / 179
608 / 701
133 / 139
10 / 16
0 / 0
392 / 371
128 / 123 79 / 40 169 / 140 4 / 13
450 / 435
118 / 226
540 / 467
162 / 169
552 / 545
21 / 62
0 / 0
0 / 089 / 191 11 / 44 90 / 112 0 / 0
40 / 36
27 / 110
418 / 547
136 / 105
682 / 453
55 / 64
7 / 14
68 / 220
15 / 172
274 / 268
0 / 2
321 / 491
91 / 35
37 / 35
0 / 0
363 / 71 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 21
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 449 / 366 7 / 15
284 / 626 484 / 454 561 / 515 664 / 703
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 44
14 / 10
19 / 9
4 / 9 0 / 0 308 / 218 43 / 30
525 / 432
115 / 195
146 / 40
288 / 102
624 / 514
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-4a
Opening Year 2026 Without Project Traffic Volumes
713 / 822
123 / 50
24 / 6
9 / 14143 / 132 170 / 196 0 / 0 16 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0
665 / 819
160 / 215
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY da Z Yc c ccb b b b
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X S T U XS T U X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYc c ccb bbb
83 / 159
551 / 730
45 / 53
0 / 0
163 / 184
179 / 203
41 / 47
47 / 73 177 / 357 91 / 263 0 / 0
25 26 27 28
260 / 179 2 / 8 0 / 0
414 / 493 0 / 0 276 / 475 1 / 0
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
116 / 129 0 / 0 35 / 4 0 / 0
535 / 533
150 / 118
614 / 606
56 / 77
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0260 / 190 0 / 0 123 / 331 0 / 0
171 / 96
183 / 783
168 / 678
162 / 69
16 / 5
173 / 239
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1 / 0 1 / 0 485 / 692 485 / 692
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
401 / 523
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 31
57 / 72
127 / 159
0 / 0
173 / 293
22 / 85
179 / 238
401 / 523
0 / 0
29 / 113 230 / 97 0 / 0 0 / 0
33 34 35 36
86 / 36 58 / 227 0 / 0
184 / 246 0 / 0 353 / 613 1 / 0
29 / 12
0 / 0
230 / 97
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 36 0 / 0 7 / 28 0 / 0
119 / 148
86 / 115
81 / 108
115 / 49
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-4b
Opening Year 2026 Without Project Traffic Volumes
1 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 061 / 77 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
232 / 295
58 / 227
445 / 481
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Does not exist
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
29 / 24
547 / 607
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
7 / 28
98 / 63 0 / 0 66 / 49 55 / 76
1234
568 / 403 7 / 19 92 / 91
63 / 66 443 / 495 738 / 712 451 / 337
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
245 / 285
328 / 436
56 / 62
0 / 0 159 / 320 9 / 15 253 / 268
52 / 104
4 / 11
0 / 0
210 / 566
361 / 962
18 / 31
545 / 386
48 / 675 / 16 0 / 0 42 / 89 86 / 256
365 / 3
488 / 358 682 / 990
143 / 106
4 / 2
42 / 32
78 / 53
64 / 83
18 / 11
78 / 75
626 / 615
146 / 128
116 / 50
381 / 493
147 / 150
21 / 35 124 / 111 114 / 118 0 / 0
5678
78 / 122 72 / 81 98 / 117
451 / 447 422 / 369 57 / 30 236 / 209
364 / 25
126 / 321
149 / 301
23 / 20
0 / 0
88 / 105
77 / 39 82 / 92 17 / 343 29 / 32
367 / 545
39 / 23
96 / 83
30 / 40
278 / 438
129 / 112
0 / 0
0 / 033 / 41 71 / 95 9 / 220 0 / 0
712 / 603
66 / 83
22 / 65
214 / 6
110 / 112
74 / 85
48 / 46
388 / 584
24 / 41
24 / 32
0 / 0
46 / 38
42 / 35
234 / 443
0 / 0
55 / 86 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
25 / 44 0 / 0 223 / 40
207 / 221 1 / 1 0 / 0 665 / 685
176 / 62
130 / 641
0 / 0
45 / 63
61 / 355
52 / 311
49 / 50 17 / 21 61 / 189 0 / 0
166 / 249
38 / 92
588 / 477
65 / 89
1 / 1
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-5
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
485 / 757
63 / 17
203 / 45
21 / 32140 / 196 0 / 0 36 / 121 25 / 70
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
124 / 50
357 / 79
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
380 / 369
3 / 1
297 / 378
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 18 / 20 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
326 / 454 62 / 49 34 / 48
544 / 376 491 / 585 553 / 809 526 / 735
135 / 132
7 / 8
68 / 70
36 / 31
20 / 5
22 / 24
0 / 0 254 / 453 67 / 93 20 / 32
346 / 631
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
483 / 675
318 / 161
12 / 3
22 / 13128 / 374 0 / 0 4 / 11 19 / 29
28 / 1
391 / 366
682 / 738
23 / 24
7 / 4
12 / 22
94 / 115
445 / 579
81 / 135
77 / 89
40 / 48
120 / 109
101 / 82
725 / 791
21 / 10
149 / 230 16 / 97 80 / 100 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
128 / 64 130 / 143 329 / 519
347 / 535 590 / 730 518 / 640 45 / 72
127 / 179
608 / 701
133 / 139
10 / 16
0 / 0
409 / 418
133 / 137 79 / 40 169 / 140 4 / 13
455 / 449
153 / 235
540 / 467
162 / 169
557 / 559
21 / 62
0 / 0
0 / 0102 / 228 11 / 44 90 / 112 0 / 0
40 / 36
27 / 110
423 / 561
136 / 105
682 / 453
55 / 64
7 / 14
88 / 276
23 / 195
274 / 268
0 / 2
321 / 491
113 / 41
37 / 35
0 / 0
363 / 71 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 21
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 449 / 366 7 / 15
306 / 632 528 / 466 596 / 524 699 / 712
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 44
14 / 10
19 / 9
4 / 9 0 / 0 308 / 218 43 / 30
533 / 455
137 / 201
199 / 54
288 / 102
637 / 551
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-5a
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
726 / 859
123 / 50
24 / 6
9 / 14151 / 155 173 / 205 0 / 0 16 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0
678 / 856
169 / 217
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W W WSTU X S TU X S T U XS T U X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYc c c cb bbb
83 / 159
551 / 730
45 / 53
0 / 0
170 / 203
201 / 264
41 / 47
47 / 73 177 / 357 91 / 263 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
317 / 194 2 / 8 0 / 0
449 / 502 0 / 0 311 / 484 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
116 / 129 0 / 0 35 / 4 0 / 0
548 / 570
150 / 118
614 / 606
56 / 77
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
13 / 51260 / 190 0 / 0 131 / 354 43 / 11
189 / 101
183 / 783
181 / 715
184 / 75
16 / 5
173 / 239
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 375 / 94 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 532 / 879 860 / 786
11 / 43
0 / 0
93 / 375
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
69 / 113
11 / 43
0 / 0
13 / 51
26 / 102
11 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
15 / 60
448 / 710
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 31
65 / 95
127 / 159
0 / 0
173 / 293
22 / 85
179 / 238
448 / 710
0 / 0
37 / 136 230 / 97 0 / 0 /
33 34 35 36
86 / 36 58 / 227 /
184 / 246 0 / 0 397 / 625 /
29 / 12
0 / 0
230 / 97
/
/
/
29 / 36 0 / 0 7 / 28 /
119 / 148
86 / 115
103 / 114
137 / 55
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 6-5b
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
61 / 77 0 / 0 0 / 0 /
232 / 295
58 / 227
462 / 528
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

6.5 Intersection Analysis
Table 6-2 displays the LOS analysis results for the st udy intersection under Opening Year with and without Project conditions.

2. I-5 Northbound Ramps & E Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

7. Bay Boulevard & F Street (LOS E – PM Peak)

11. Bay Boulevard & G Street (LOS E – PM Peak)

12. Bay Boulevard & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS F – AM & PM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

23. I-5 Northbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – AM Peak)

25. Broadway & J Street (LOS E – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

Appendix F contains the intersection LOS worksheets.

61 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-2
Opening Year Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year 2026
w/Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal AM 18.7 B 20.7 C
PM 35.7 D 38.3 D
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 57.1 E 56.5 E
PM 15.4 B 15.5 B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal AM 11.7 B 11.4 B
PM 13.7 B 13.9 B
4 Broadway & E St Signal AM 42.8 D 43.2 D
PM 48.1 D 48.7 D
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal AM 17.5 B 17.0 B
PM 15.3 B 14.9 B
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal AM 40.1 D 40.0 D
PM 40.4 D 40.4 D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 17.9 C 22.2 C
PM 31.6 D 36.4 E
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC AM 9.5 A 9.7 A
PM 11.2 B 11.6 B
9 Broadway & F St Signal AM 40.0 D 39.5 D
PM 42.0 D 41.7 D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC AM n/a4 PM
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 16.3 C 23.8 C
PM 22.3 C 53.0 F
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 22.1 C 29.3 C
PM 38.0 D 111.6 F
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal AM 21.9 C 21.7 C
PM 34.1 C 32.1 C
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 13.5 B 15.0 B
PM 22.3 C 50.3 D
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal AM 19.1 B 18.4 B
PM 15.8 B 15.6 B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal AM 30.6 C 30.0 C
PM 26.3 C 25.8 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the en tire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst move ment at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

62 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-2
Opening Year Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year 2026
w/Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
17 Broadway & H St Signal AM 31.1 C 31.5 C
PM 32.9 C 33.1 C
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.3 D 46.0 D
PM 19.0 B 18.8 B
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.9 D 44.9 D
PM 38.5 D 38.4 D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy Signal AM 7.5 A 7.9 A
PM 10.0 A 11.4 B
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AWSC AM 107.2 F 145.0 F
PM 65.5 F 91.3 F
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 50.2 D 49.7 D
PM 30.9 C 87.6 F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 111.9 F 111.9 F
PM 20.2 C 42.7 D
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC AM 25.9 D 28.2 D
PM 23.3 C 25.5 D
25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 50.6 D 52.2 D
PM 51.8 D 55.3 E
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 12.9 B 14.0 B
PM 154.8 F 162.9 F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal AM 12.2 B 12.6 B
PM 45.1 D 47.7 D
28 W Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.6 A
PM 9.3 A
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.8 A
PM 9.9 A
30 E Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.5 A
PM 9.7 A
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 23.1 C
PM >300 F
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 13.7 B
PM 15.2 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the en tire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst move ment at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

63 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-2
Opening Year Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year
2026 w/Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
33 Marina Pkwy & H St Signal AM 17.5 B 19.1 B
PM 19.2 B 23.2 C
34 Marina Pkwy & Street C Signal AM 8.9 A 8.9 A
PM 8.4 A 8.4 A
35 Street A & J St Signal AM 7.0 A 7.1 A
PM 7.0 A 7.1 A
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

6.6 Project Fair Share
Table 6-3 summarizes the Project’s fair share of new tr affic added to the intersections that would operate at LOS E or F. As shown in the table, the Project would contribute between 1.0 percent and 38.5 percent at the affected intersections.

64 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-3
Opening Year Project Fair Share
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
Traffic Volumes1
% Proj Proj Total
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St AM 53 2,382 2.2%
PM 51 2,553 2.0%
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM 58 1,307 4.4%
PM 55 1,686 3.3%
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM 171 852 20.1%
PM 172 1,111 15.5%
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM 321 1,759 18.2%
PM 305 2,279 13.4%
21 Bay Blvd & J St AM 122 2,171 5.6%
PM 114 2,162 5.3%
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM 45 2,140 2.1%
PM 42 2,241 1.9%
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St AM 42 2,539 1.7%
PM 36 2,416 1.5%
25 Broadway & J St AM 36 2,948 1.2%
PM 34 3,242 1.0%
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM 75 1,208 6.2%
PM 72 1,874 3.8%
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM 522 1,408 37.1%
PM 761 1,976 38.5%
Notes:

Only intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the Project are shown in the table.

The fair share calculations are based on actual traffic volumes and do not include PCE adjustments.

6.7 Improvements
Table 6-4 summarizes the proposed improvements at the affected intersections and Figure 6-6 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections.

As shown in the table, the Project would be fully resp onsible for signal retiming at the I-5 NB Ramps & E Street, Bay Boulevard & H Street, I-5 NB and SB Ra mps & J Street, and at the Broadway & J Street intersections and constructing a traffic signal at th e Bay Boulevard & G Street and Project Driveway & H Street intersections. The Project would contribute its fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal or roundabout at the Bay Boulevard & F Street. The Project would contribute its fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal at the Bay Boulevard & J Street and Bay Boulevard & L Street intersections. It should be noted that Intersections #21 and #26 correspond with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5 and BAY-28 #6, respectively.

All proposed improvements would achieve LOS D or better conditions during both peak periods.

The improvements identified in this LMA are re commendations and the final improvement plan and project funding responsibility will be defined and documented in a separate Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan Transportation Conditions of Approval memo. Appendix J contains the intersection LOS worksheets with the improvements.
65 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-4
Project Improvements
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year
2026 w/Proj
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3

Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E
St Signal AM 56.5 E 45.4 D -11.1 Signal retiming 100%

PM 15.5 B 15.5 B 0.0
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC
AM 22.2 C 19.5 B -2.7 Signalize intersection Fair Share

PM 36.4 E 22.0 C -14.4
AM 22.2 C 14.7 B -7.5 Construct
roundabout6 Fair Share

PM 36.4 E 53.2 F 16.8
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 23.8 C 8.6 A -15.2 Signalize intersection 100%

PM 53.0 F 17.2 B -35.8
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 29.3 C 24.1 C -5.2 Restripe SB approach Signal retiming7 100%

PM 111.6 F 33.6 C -78.0
21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 145.0 F 37.7 D -107.3 Signalize intersection4 Fair Share

PM 91.3 F 22.4 C -68.9
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 49.7 D 22.3 C -27.4 Signal retiming 100%

PM 87.6 F 31.5 C -56.1
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 111.9 F 53.1 D -58.8 Signal retiming 100%

PM 42.7 D 24.7 C -18.0
25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 52.2 D 51.5 D -0.7 Signal retiming 100%

PM 55.3 E 45.3 D -10.0
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 14.0 B 11.6 B -2.4 Signalize intersection5 Fair Share

PM 162.9 F 24.5 C -138.4
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 23.1 C 8.3 A -14.8 Signalize intersection 100%

PM >300 F 13.1 B ->300
Notes:

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

5. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

6. Improvement is based on the 30% conceptual design and includ es 1-lane approaches on all legs. The feasibility of expanding the roundabout and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.

7. Improvement is considered a conceptual design whose feasibility, including adequacy of turn bay storage and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.

66 1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 6-6
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics With Improvements 7 Bay Blvd & F St
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

OVL
OVL
Signal Retiming
Note:

This intersection contains 2
proposed improvements
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
67 ~ ~ ~
+~ +- ~
+
+- _.) ++ ~ +-., +- ., .,
-+
1 ♦,.- .J. ~,..
.J.
~ttr -+ ~,.. -+ -+
~ -+ T T -+
• • • • +
~ ~ ~ ~
+
+- _.)++ ~ +-
4 A ., ., +-
• 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 • -+ -+
+ y T -+
• • • + •
~
~.~ +- A ~ ~ +~ ., • .J.
~ttr 4 .J. ~t
-+
~tr -+ T y ~
• • • •
+-+-
_.)~
., ~ ., +-
-+ 1 ~+,.--+ y -+ -+
• • ~-
~ N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 6-6a
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics With Improvements PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Improvements are shown in green.

Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Signal Retiming
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
68 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~ ~~
~
~~ 'f" A~ 'f"
.J. ~tt,,- -4 .J.
~t.-
_.
.J. _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
_.,. 'f" 'f"
•
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 6-6b
Opening Year 2026 Intersection Geometrics With Improvements 29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St 33 Marina Pkwy & H St 34 Marina Pkwy & Street C 35 Street A & J St PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Improvements are shown in green.

Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Signal Retiming
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
69 • • • •
~ ~
~ ~~ +-
.. ~
~
~ f'" f'" ~~~ +-
•
+- +-
_. ~
~~ t~
~ _. _. _.
~
_.
• • • •

TRAFFIC CONSULTING

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

6.8 Signal Warrants
The latest California Manual on Uniform Traffic Cont rol Devices (CA MUTCD) 2014, Revision 8 states that a roundabout should be considered at locations where a traffic signal is proposed if it is determined to provide a viable and practical solution. The followin g list summarizes the consideration of a roundabout at the locations where a traffic signal is proposed.

 Bay Boulevard & F Street: A 30 percent conceptual design of a roundabout was prepared for this location as part of the F Street Promenade project. As part of the design, it was assumed that the roundabout would be a 1-lane roundabout with one lane on each approach. A roundabout and a traffic signal were considered for this location.
 Bay Boulevard & G Street: This intersection is th e main access for the north side of the site and would encounter a lot of larger trucks. The Caltrans right-of-way is also located immediately to the east of Bay Boulevard. With the larger turning radius required to accommodate the large trucks, a roundabout was dismissed.
 Bay Boulevard & J Street: The Bayfront Transp ortation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (BAY-28 #5) assumes the construction of a traffic signal at this location. Since this is an approved City document, the analysis of a roundabout was dismissed.  Bay Boulevard & L Street: The Bayfront Transp ortation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (BAY-28 #6) assumes the construction of a traffic signal at this location. Since this is an approved City document, the analysis of a roundabout was dismissed.  Project Driveway & H Street: This intersection is the main access fo r the south side of the site. A traffic signal is being constructed at the Marina Parkway & H Street intersection to the west.

The proposed Street A & H Street intersection was assumed to include a traffic signal to the east.

A potential roundabout at this location would al so require additional right-of-way to the south, which is controlled by the Port and would shift the existing bike path. Based on these reasons, a roundabout was dismissed.

The signal warrant analysis was performed at the locations where a traffic signal is proposed using the criteria outlined in Chapter 4C of the CA MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 for Warrant 3, Peak-Hour. It should be noted that the signal warrant analysis was not perf ormed where the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 6-5 summarizes the results of the peak-hour signal warrant analyses.

As shown in the table, the traffic signal warrant was satisfied using the peak-hour traffic volume criteria under the Existing Plus Project Traffic scenario at tw o of the five intersections for a minimum of one of the peak-hours. Under the Opening Year With Projec t scenario, all intersections would satisfy the peak- hour signal warrant for a minimum of one of the peak-hours.

Appendix K contains the signal warrant analyses worksheets and supporting data.

70 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-5
Project Traffic Peak-Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary # Intersection
Peak
Hour
Warrant 3 Met?1
Existing Plus Proj
Opening Year 2026
w/Proj
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM n/a2 No
PM Yes
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM n/a2 No
PM Yes
21 Bay Blvd & J St AM Yes Yes
PM No Yes
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM Yes Yes
PM Yes Yes
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM n/a2 No
PM Yes
Notes:

1. The signal warrant analysis was performed using the criteria outlined in Chapter 4C of the CA MUTCD 2014 for Warrant 3, Peak-Hour.

2. The intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS.

6.9 Queuing Analysis
A queuing analysis was performed at the two project driveways where a traffic signal is being proposed to determine the appropriate turn pocket leng ths. The queue length reported is the 95 th percentile queue length, which represents the queue length where 95 pe rcent of the queue lengths fall and only would be exceeded 5 percent of the time. Table 6-6 summarizes the results of the queuing analyses.

Table 6-6
Opening Year Queuing Analysis Summary
Intersection
Peak
Hour Movement
Storage Length
(ft)1
Queue Length (ft)2
Opening Year 2026 w/Proj
11 Bay Blvd & G St
AM NB LT 280 96
PM 62
AM EB LT 150 53
PM 136
AM EB RT 150 23
PM 38
31 Proj Dwy & H St
AM EB LT 170 40
PM 18
AM SB LT 325 79
PM 246
AM SB RT 325 10
PM 19
Notes:

Values shown in bold indicate movements where the queue length exceeds the available storage length.

1. The storage length was based on the latest site plan prepared for the project and/or conceptual plans for the traffic signal.

2. The queue length shown represents the 95th percentile queue length for each respective movement and reported from Synchro 11.

71 I I I ~

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
As shown in the table, the 95 th percentile queue lengths at both in tersections would be contained within the respective turn pockets.

Appendix L contains the queuing analyses worksheets.

6.10 Multi-Modal Analysis
The alternative modes of travel such as pedestrian, bi cycle, and transit were evaluated with the Project.

As described within the City’s TSG, the pedestrian and bicycle analysis are focused along the project’s frontage and for locations within 0.25 miles of the Proj ect. The transit analysis is focused on the transit amenities and connectivity to transit within a 0.50-mil e walkshed from a high-quality transit corridor.

Figure 6-7 illustrates the study are for the multi-modal analyses. Table 6-7 summarizes the potential improvements to accommodate the Project’s active transportation needs.

72 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Oaklawn AveWoodlawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
LEGEND

0.25 mile radius for
pedestrian/bicycle analysis

0.50 mile walkshed for
transit analysis
H St Transit Station
Figure 6-7
Multi-Modal Analysis Study Area
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
73 ZUTA

IC CONSUL

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 6-7
Potential Improvements to Accommodate the Project’s Active Transportation Needs Proximity
Facility Type
Pedestrian Bicycle Transit
Project Frontage &
Adjacent Facilities1
 Close sidewalk
gaps
 Upgrade
substandard bike
facilities
 Add missing transit
amenities
according to MTS
Designing for
Transit Guidelines.

High-quality
transit amenities
(shelter, trash cans,
benches, street
trees) are
encouraged.
 Remove pathway
obstructions
 Fill gaps in the
Planned Bikeway
Network
 Construct curb
ramps per current
ADA standards

 Implement
identified traffic
calming measures

Within ¼ of Project
 Close sidewalk
gaps
 Upgrade
substandard bike
facilities
 Remove pathway
obstructions
 Coordinate with
City staff to pay fair
share towards
Planned Bikeways
 Implement
identified traffic
calming measures

Notes:

Referenced from Table 5 of the City’s TSG.

1. Adjacent facilities are defined as intersections immediately adjacent to the projec t site. Location of adjacent facilities should be identified in coordination with City’s staff prior to conducting a LMA.

6.10.1 Pedestrian Analysis
The pedestrian analysis is focused along the Project’ s frontage of G Street between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard and also along H Street between Mari na Parkway and I-5. Additionally, Bay Boulevard between G Street and H Street is included in the pedestrian analysis.

As part of the Project, sidewalks will be constructed along the Project’s frontage of G Street. All Project driveways would be constructed to City standards a nd include warning detectible strips at the curb returns. Additionally, all Project driveways along H Street would be constructed to City standards and include warning detectible strips at the curb returns.

The Chula Vista Bayfront Phase 1A Improvements consist of new 24-inch white thermoplastic ladder style crosswalks on the north, south, and west legs of the Bay Boulevard & H Street intersection. At the Marina Parkway & H Street intersection, a new tra ffic signal will be constructed and will include all 74 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
new curb returns with warning detectible strips and a 24-inch white thermoplastic ladder style crosswalk on all legs of the intersection.

Within the Project site, all internal roadways would have sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. There are no sidewalk gaps that would exist with the Pr oject and pedestrians would have a continuous path from the Project to the H Street Transit Station.

6.10.2 Bicycle Analysis
The bicycle analysis is focused along the Project’s frontage of G Street between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard and also along H Street between Marina Parkway and I-5. Additionally, Bay Boulevard between G Street and H Street is included in the bicycle analysis.

Within the study area, there is a Class I bicycle path along the south side of H Street between Marina Parkway and Bay Boulevard and connects with the exis t i n g B a y s h o r e B i k e w a y . A s p a r t o f t h e C h u l a Vista Bayfront Phase 1A Improvements Project, bicycle detectors will be added at the approach to the Bay Boulevard & H Street intersection. There is also a Class II bicycle lane on both sides of Bay Boulevard between G Street and H Street.

The proposed cross section for this segment is 14-feet in width that includes a 5-foot shared use path and a 2-foot shoulder in each direction.

6.10.3 Transit Analysis
The transit analysis focused on the transit amenities and connectivity to transit within a 0.50-mile walkshed of a high-quality transit corridor, which happe ns to be located at the H Street Transit Station.

There are no planned improvements for additional tran sit service on the west of I-5. As discussed in Section 6.9.1 above, there are no sidewalk gaps in the study area and pedestrians would have a direct connection between the Project and the H Street Transi t Station via the existing sidewalks. The current headway for the transit service is approximately 20 minutes during the weekday peak-hours.

75 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
7 PROGRAMMATIC-LEVEL PROJECT TRAFFIC
This section describes the estimated trip generation, trip distribution , and assignment of trips of the entire Specific Plan area to the adjacent roadway network.

7.1 Trip Generation
Trip generation rates published by the SANDAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Tr affic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 were applied to the existing and proposed uses on site to estimate the traffic generation characteristics of the site. The trip ge neration was estimated for the AM and PM peak-hour and daily traffic. Passby and internal capture trips were not accounted for as a conservative estimate.

Table 7-1 summarizes the proposed trip generation for the Programmatic-Level portion of the Project (Planning Areas A and B-2).

As shown in the table, the Programmatic-Level portion of the Project is forecasted to generate a subtotal of 8,168 daily trips with 487 AM peak-hour trips and 767 PM peak-hour trips. After applying the existing trip credits, the Programmatic-Level portion of the Project is forecasted to generate a net total of 6,349 daily trips with 210 AM peak-hour trips and 460 PM peak-hour trips.

7.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment
The project trip distribution for the Programmatic Level Analyses was based on SANDAG’s 2050 Series 13 Activity-Based Model Version 2+ (ABM2+) select zone forecast. The entire project site is in TAZ 4653, which includes two micro-analysis zones 8013 and 8014. The ABM2+ wa s updated to reflect the current project. Centroid connectors and roadway networks within the study area were reviewed and verified.

A screenline analysis was performed to determine the overall trip distribution for the Project. The following list summarizes the trip distribution:

 44 percent to/from the north
 26 percent to/from the south
 31 percent to/from the east

Figures 7-1 and 7-2 display the assumed Project trip distribu tion through the study intersections and project driveways for Planning Areas A and B-2, resp ectively. Based on the Programmatic-Level Project trip generation and distribution, the Programmatic-Leve l Project trips were assign ed to the study area.

Figures 7-3 and 7-4 illustrate the Programmatic-Level Project trip assignment for Planning Areas A and B-2, respectively. Figure 7-5 illustrates the total project trip assignment of the entire Project.

Appendix M contains the SANDAG 2050 Series 13 ABM2+ plots.

76 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 7-1
Total Project Trip Generation
TRIP GENERATION RATES1
Land Use Weekday Daily

AM PEAK PM PEAK
% ADT In:Out Ratio % ADT In:Out Ratio
Warehousing 5 trips / ksf 13% 0.70 : 0.30 15% 0.40 : 0.60 Resort Hotel 8 trips / rm 5% 0.60 : 0.40 7% 0.40 : 0.60 Industrial/Business Park (w/commercial) 16 tr ips / ksf 12% 0.80 : 0.20 12% 0.20 : 0.80 Manufacturing/Assembly 4 trips / ksf 19% 0.90 : 0.10 20% 0.20 : 0.80 Quality Restaurant 100 trips / ksf 1% 0.60 : 0.40 8% 0.70 : 0.30

TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
Land Use
Planning
Area Amount ADT

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Uses
Warehousing A 231.174 ksf 1,156 106 45 151 70 104 174
Manufacturing/Assembly B-2 165.612 ksf 663 114 12 126 27 106 133 Existing Trips 4,224 632 102 734 194 594 788
Proposed Uses
Programmatic-Level Analysis
Industrial/Business Park (w/commercial) A 198.000 ksf 3,168 305 76 381 77 304 381 Resort Hotel B-2 175 rm 1,400 42 28 70 40 58 98
Quality Restaurant B-2 36.000 ksf 3,600 22 14 36 202 86 288 Subtotal: Programmatic-Level Analysis 8,168 369 118 487 319 448 767 Net Programmatic-Level Analysis 6,349 149 61 210 222 238 460 Notes:
ksf: 1,000 sf, rm: rooms

1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002.

77 xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d aZYc cccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X ST U X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da ZY da Z Yccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVVVW WWWS TU X STU X S TU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d a ZYc cccb bbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
1234
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 1% / (0%) 1% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5678
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (10%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (10%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
91 0 1 11 2
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
2% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 68% / (0%)
11% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (5%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (11%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (2%)
3% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-1
Planning Level A Project Trip Distribution
0% / (68%)
21% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (21%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 78
~
~ \ ,',\
'I\ .\i t '!, ;\i
.%_ \'-l ~};, i -. •1\ '\i •\\ ·~\ i· >
~\ " ~ -. .--:::; .
. .
\
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVW WWWSTU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc cccbbbb
44% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
13 14 15 16
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
24% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 8% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (44%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (52%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
16% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (16%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
6% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
17 18 19 20
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
2% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (2%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (16%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
4% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
21 22 23 24
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 4% / (0%) 4% / (0%) 4% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
16% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-1a
Planning Level A Project Trip Distribution
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 79
~
~ \ ,',\
'I\ .\i t '!, ;\i
.%_ \'-l ~};, i -. •1\ '\i •\\ ·~\ i· >
~\ " ~ -. .--:::; .
. .
\
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

V V VVW W W WSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc c c cbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (9%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
25 26 27 28
7% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
4% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 7% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
9% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
29 30 31 32
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (89%) 0% / (89%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (89%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (89%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (89%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%) 50% / (0%)
33 34 35 36
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-1b
Planning Level A Project Trip Distribution
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (50%
)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 80
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

V VVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & PA-A Proj Dwy & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0% / (89%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
/
/
/
89% / (0%)
0% / (0%) / / /
37 000
/ / /
0% / (0%) / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0% / (0%) / / /
0% / (89%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
/
/
/
/
0% / (0%) / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-1c
Planning Level A Project Trip Distribution
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 81
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d aZYc cccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X ST U X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da ZY da Z Yccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVVVW WWWS TU X STU X S T UX S TU X
da ZY d aZY da ZY d a ZYc cccb b bb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
1234
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 1% / (0%) 1% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
5678
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 10% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (10%)
5% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (10%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
91 0 1 11 2
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
2% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 68% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
11% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
11% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (5%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (11%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (2%)
3% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-2
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Distribution
0% / (68%)
21% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (39%) 0% / (21%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
39% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 82
~
~ \ f\ ,., ·\i • •h
0 , \\ \:r- \ 'i ·,t-;,
<!>'l. \l';. ,\i %1. 'i_
\\ ~,\ '~ -~
. - .
\ \
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVW WWWSTU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc cccbbbb
44% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
13 14 15 16
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
24% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 8% / (0%) 8% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (44%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (52%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
16% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (16%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
6% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (8%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
17 18 19 20
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (6%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
2% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (2%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (1%)
0% / (16%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
4% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
21 22 23 24
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 4% / (0%) 4% / (0%) 4% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
16% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-2a
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Distribution
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 83
~
~ \ f\ I\ ,\i \ "}_i
0 1;\-i i":"f. ~i "~t
~~ \t, ';. ~\i 1 ";. -e:.
\\ ~,\ '~ ~
- .
\ \
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

V V VVW W W WSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc c c cbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVV VWWWWSTU X STU X ST U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccc cbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (9%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
25 26 27 28
7% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
4% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 7% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
9% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
29 30 31 32
0% / (0%) 100% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 100% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (100%
)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (3%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (7%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (4%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (100%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (1%) 0% / (0%)
33 34 35 36
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-2b
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Distribution
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%) 0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
1% / (0%)
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 84
xx% / (yy%) = Enter % / (Exit %) Trip Distribution Percentage The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
/
/
/
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%) / / /
37 000
/ / /
100% / (0%) / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0% / (0%) / / /
0% / (100%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
0% / (0%)
/
/
/
/
0% / (0%) / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-2c
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Distribution
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
xx%
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
9%
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 85
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d aZYc cccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X ST U X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da ZY da Z Yccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVVVW WWWS TU X STU X S TU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d a ZYc cccb bbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1234
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 3 / 0 3 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 3
0 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 26 / 2 0 / 0
5678
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 26 / 2
0 / 0
3 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 3
5 / 26
13 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 26
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
91 0 1 11 2
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
5 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 173 / 14
40 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 13 0 / 0 10 / 40 0 / 0
1 / 5
8 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-3
Planning Level A Project Trip Assignment
31 / 174
54 / 4
0 / 0
0 / 01 / 8 0 / 0 0 / 0 9 / 54
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 86
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVW WWWSTU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc cccbbbb
112 / 9
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 14 15 16
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
61 / 5 20 / 2 20 / 2 20 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 20 / 113 0 / 0 0 / 0
23 / 133
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 20
41 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 07 / 41 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 20
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
15 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 20
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 01 / 5 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 3
7 / 41
2 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
10 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 10 / 1 10 / 1 10 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
41 / 3
0 / 0
2 / 10
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-3a
Planning Level A Project Trip Assignment
2 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 87
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

V V VVW W W WSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc c c cbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 23
3 / 18
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
25 26 27 28
18 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0
10 / 1 0 / 0 18 / 1 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
2 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
23 / 2
0 / 0
3 / 18
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 80 / 320 80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
80 / 320
0 / 0
40 / 228 0 / 0 0 / 3 181 / 46
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-3b
Planning Level A Project Trip Assignment
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
45 / 180
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 88
~
- 1 i
,\ {'I-, ', i "' ~\1 t ~\t
i;_\~ b~ ~ ~ \ \'<I& ~
~~ ;:i,i~ tt\t 1~ ~
!)"! 'i ... 0 ,:.
~, . ... ~ .
~
\
. \ •
\\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

V VVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
321 / 81
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
0 / 0 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-3c
Planning Level A Project Trip Assignment
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 89
~
- 1 i
,\ {'I-, ', i "' ~\1 t ~\t
i;_\~ b~ ~ ~ \ \'<I& ~
~~ ;:i,i~ tt\t 1~ ~
!)"! 'i ... 0 ,:.
~, . ... ~ .
~
\
. \ •
\\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X ST U X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVVVW WWWS TU X STU X S T UX S TU X
da ZY d aZY da ZY d a ZYc cccb b bb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-1 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1234
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 -1 / 2 -1 / 2 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 -5 / 22 0 / 0
5678
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 -5 / 22
0 / 0
-1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 4
-3 / 11
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 4
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
91 0 1 11 2
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
-1 / 4 0 / 0 0 / 0 -34 / 146
0 / 0
7 / 27
0 / 0
-6 / 24
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2 0 / 0 5 / 16 0 / 0
1 / 1
-2 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-4
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Assignment
20 / 26
-11 / 45
0 / 0
0 / 01 / 1 0 / 0 16 / 56 6 / 8
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
25 / 94
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 90
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVW WWWS TU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc cccbbbb
-22 / 95
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 14 15 16
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
-12 / 52 -4 / 17 -4 / 17 -4 / 17
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 13 / 17 0 / 0 0 / 0
16 / 20
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 3
-8 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 05 / 6 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-3 / 13
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
-1 / 4
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 01 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 6
1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-2 / 9
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 -2 / 9 -2 / 9 -2 / 9
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-1 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-8 / 34
0 / 0
1 / 2
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-4a
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Assignment
1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 91
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

V V VVW W W WSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yc c c cbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVV VWWWWSTU X STU X ST U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccc cbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
3 / 3
2 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
25 26 27 28
-4 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
-2 / 9 0 / 0 -4 / 15 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 40 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
-5 / 19
0 / 0
2 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 64 / 242 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 64 / 242
0 / 0
0 / 0
42 / 144
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
1 / 4
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 6
3 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
42 / 144
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-4b
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Assignment
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
-1 / 2
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 92
~
- 1 i
,\ {'I-, ', i "' ~\1 t ~\t
i;_\~ b~ ~ ~ \ \'<I& ~
~~ ;:i,i~ tt\t 1~ ~
!)"! 'i ... 0 ,:.
~, . ... ~ .
~
\
. \ •
\\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

VVVVW WWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
0 / 0
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
64 / 242 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
42 / 144
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-4c
Planning Level B-2 Project Trip Assignment
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 36
37 93
~
- 1 i
,\ {'I-, ', i "' ~\1 t ~\t
i;_\~ b~ ~ ~ \ \'<I& ~
~~ ;:i,i~ tt\t 1~ ~
!)"! 'i ... 0 ,:.
~, . ... ~ .
~
\
. \ •
\\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X S TU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da ZYccccbbbb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWW WS TU X S TU X S T U X STU X
da ZY da ZY d a ZY da Z Yccc cbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

V V V VW WWWS TU X STU X ST UX STU X
da ZY d aZY da ZY d aZ Yc cccb b bb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-5
Total Project Trip Assignment
138 / 443
105 / 65
13 / 3
0 / 02 / 9 0 / 0 29 / 107 38 / 128
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
76 / 107
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 15 0 / 0 43 / 167 0 / 0
12 / 34
6 / 7
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
91 0 1 11 2
8 / 23 0 / 0 13 / 3
30 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0 368 / 220
151 / 38
7 / 27
0 / 0
-6 / 24
5 / 14
5 / 14
10 / 12
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
0 / 0
18 / 58
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 02 / 5 2 / 5 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
12 / 36
18 / 58
2 / 5 2 / 5 0 / 0 0 / 0
13 / 37
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
10 / 28
4 / 1
0 / 0 0 / 0 47 / 31 0 / 0
5678
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 9 26 / 7 0 / 0 47 / 31
0 / 0
33 / 10
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
4 / 1
0 / 0
0 / 00 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 2 / 5
0 / 0
0 / 0
20 / 59
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 2 / 8
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
12 / 36
20 / 59
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0
1234
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
22 / 6 55 / 16 55 / 16 44 / 12
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
6 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
33 / 10 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 94
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY d aZY d aZY d aZYccccb bbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V VVVWWWWSTU XS T U XS T U XS T U X
da Z Yd a Z Yd a ZY d aZYccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-5a
Total Project Trip Assignment
16 / 49
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 08 / 23 3 / 9 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
16 / 49
9 / 2
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
8 / 23
22 / 6
86 / 51
0 / 0
16 / 49
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
22 / 6 52 / 22 43 / 19 43 / 19
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 3
32 / 103
11 / 35
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 16
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 015 / 43 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
10 / 31 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
5 / 14
39 / 13
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 14
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
0 / 0 0 / 0 44 / 12
13 / 3 13 / 3 13 / 3 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
25 / 17
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 89
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 037 / 117 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 89
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 76 / 252 0 / 0 0 / 0
106 / 340
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 89
99 / 54
0 / 0 0 / 0
13 14 15 16
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
177 / 91 78 / 35 78 / 35 78 / 35
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
205 / 134
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 95
~ /\
i:~ ,\\ t \i\ ~ •\' ,\f- ;\ ,\\
~.'1. ~,.-;. t.~t i ~ .,. i~ ~,~ ... ~ -z,
.~ -. .---:::. .
\~ ~-
\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

V V VVW W WWSTU X STU XS T U XS T U X
da Z Y da Z Yd a ZY d a Z Yc c ccbbbb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X STU X STU X STU X
da ZY da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-5b
Total Project Trip Assignment
40 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
45 / 180
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 47
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
48 / 251 0 / 0 0 / 3 181 / 46
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 44 / 12 162 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
169 / 651
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 66
127 / 507
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
69 / 117
11 / 43
0 / 0
15 / 57
28 / 112
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 439 / 336 188 / 47
113 / 69 102 / 26 127 / 507 519 / 656
11 / 43
0 / 0
135 / 519
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
85 / 21
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 550 / 0 0 / 0 8 / 23 43 / 11
36 / 26
0 / 0
18 / 58
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
16 / 49
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
71 / 31 0 / 0 0 / 0
43 / 19 0 / 0 49 / 25 21 / 85
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
14 / 45
27 / 82
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 96
~ /\
i:~ ,\\ t \i\ ~ •\' ,\f- ;\ ,\\
~.'1. ~,.-;. t.~t i ~ .,. i~ ~,~ ... ~ -z,
.~ -. .---:::. .
\~ ~-
\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
321 / 81
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
627 / 383 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
262 / 1026
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 7-5c
Total Project Trip Assignment
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
8 EXISTING PLUS TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section summarizes the operations at the study area intersections with the Total Project traffic (Project-Level and Programmatic-Level) added to the existing street network.

In order to provide more flexibility for the developm ent within Planning Areas A and B-2 or the potential to accommodate at least a partial development of Pla nning Areas A and B-2 before the completion of the Year 2050 roadway network, an Existing Plus Total Project (Planning Areas B-1 Plus Planning Areas A & B-2) would be evaluated. This an alysis would identify the level of development in Planning Areas A and B-2 that can be accommodated by the existing transp ortation network and identify any improvements that may be required to support this development. It should be noted that this analysis does not assume any development or improvements by others (i.e., Ga ylord Hotel) and that the development of Planning Area B-1 will precede the other two planning areas.

For the purposes of this analysis, the following three scenarios would be evaluated in addition to the Total Project. These scenarios would be considered trip budgets since there are a wide range of land use possibilities for the development of Planning Area B-2 and the various thresholds would allow the flexibility of development.

 Scenario 1: 85 percent of Total Project
 Scenario 2: 70 percent of Total Project
 Scenario 3: 55 percent of Total Project

Table 8-1 summarizes the trip generation of each scenario associated with the respective trip reduction.

The various Total Net Project scenarios with the respective percent reduction is the sum of the Net Project-Level Analysis and the Net Programmatic-Level Analysis multip lied by the respective percent reduction.

Table 8-1
Total Net Project Trip Generation Budget Summary
Development Scenario ADT

1. The trip generation was referenced from Table 4-1 and include PCE’s.

2. The Total Net Project is the sum of the Net Project-Level Analysis + Net Programmatic-Level Analysis.

3. The various Total Net Project scenarios with the respective percent reduction is the sum of the Net Project-Level Analysis + the Net Programmatic-Level Analysis multiplied by the respective percent reduction.

As shown in the table, the Total Project is forecasted to generate a total of 12,858 daily trips with 888 AM peak-hour trips and 1.114 PM peak-hour trips. Scenario 1 would result in a total of 11,844 daily trips with 846 AM peak-hour trips and 1,035 PM peak-hour trips. Scenario 2 would result in a total of 10,829 daily 98 Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
trips with 805 AM peak-hour trips and 955 PM peak-hou r trips. Scenario 3 would result in a total of 9,815 daily trips with 762 AM peak-hour trips and 876 PM peak-hour trips.

8.1 Roadway Network
The lane configuration and traffic controls for the Existing Plus Total Project conditions are consistent with the Existing Plus Project Conditions as shown in Figure 5-1 with the following exceptions:

 Planning Area A Project Driveway & G Street (Int #36): Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Associated with Project.
 Planning Area A Project Driveway & H Street (Int #37): Construct north leg, stop controlled, and restricted to right-in, right-out movements only. Associated with Project.

Figure 8-1 illustrates the intersection geometrics at the study area intersections and includes the project driveways.

8.2 Traffic Volumes
The Existing Plus Total Project traffic volumes along with the three scenarios were determined by adding the Total Project traffic volumes to the existing traffic volumes.

Figures 8-2 to 8-5 illustrate the Existing Plus Total Project, Sc enario 1, Scenario 2, and Scenario 3 traffic volumes, respectively.

99 PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

North / South & East / West
1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 7 Bay Blvd & F St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 8-1
Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics
OVL
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
OVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
100
• • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., oy +-
e • 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 0 • 4 • --+- --+- ~ ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ ~
~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr 4 .J. 0
~
--+-
~tr --+- ~ y ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-y --+---+-
• • ~-
N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

ANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woo
dlawn Ave
Br
oadway
5th Ave
4t
h Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woo
dlawn Ave
Oa
klawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder
Point Dr
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 8-1a
Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
101
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~
~~
~
~~
~
'f" 'f" • 'f" 'f" e
.J. ~tt,,- • .J. 0 • _.
~t.-
_.
.J. T ~~ _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f" e •
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 8-1b
Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St
28 29
30 31
32 LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
102
• • • •
JK ~
• +-
y JK ~
• +-
_. _. T • V _. _.
•
s

IC CONSU
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-2
Existing Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes
176 / 601
106 / 66
85 / 28
21 / 32138 / 199 0 / 0 29 / 107 40 / 132
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
77 / 107
152 / 62
0 / 0
52 / 64 1 / 1 44 / 167 0 / 0
135 / 189
43 / 96
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
0 / 0
53 / 83 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
9 / 24 0 / 0 80 / 20
143 / 167 1 / 1 0 / 0 429 / 271
151 / 38
117 / 444
0 / 0
22 / 64
51 / 238
40 / 170
57 / 57
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
0 / 0
23 / 7
41 / 34
207 / 402
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 032 / 40 69 / 92 9 / 32 0 / 0
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
92 / 60
68 / 92
75 / 38 80 / 89 9 / 187 28 / 31
357 / 530
38 / 22
93 / 81
29 / 39
270 / 426
125 / 109
20 / 34 120 / 108 110 / 114 0 / 0
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
439 / 434 410 / 358 18 / 5 188 / 176
206 / 10
72 / 294
149 / 301
22 / 19
0 / 0
85 / 102
76 / 51
62 / 81
17 / 11
76 / 73
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
370 / 480
143 / 146
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 0 / 0 41 / 86 84 / 249
365 / 3
459 / 346
663 / 966
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 246 / 263
16 / 70
4 / 11
0 / 0
184 / 358
322 / 737
12 / 15
64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
40 / 26 384 / 425 720 / 693 439 / 327
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
240 / 279
318 / 423
54 / 60
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
64 / 46 0 / 0
n/a
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
103
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
256 / 169
3 / 1
295 / 376
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
287 / 142 380 / 432 555 / 805 528 / 733
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
0 / 0 111 / 387 65 / 90 19 / 31
167 / 561
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
351 / 556
166 / 69
12 / 3
21 / 1370 / 247 0 / 0 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
669 / 741
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
104 / 126
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
710 / 793
20 / 10
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 /
337 / 519 573 / 709 503 / 621 75 / 57
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
134 / 150 77 / 39 164 / 136 0 / 0
442 / 436
154 / 232
524 / 453
157 / 164
541 / 543
20 / 60
0 / 0
37 / 35101 / 228 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
411 / 545
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
7 / 17
94 / 260
21 / 153
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
67 / 44
53 / 145
4 / 13
362 / 70 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 447 / 360 7 / 15
118 / 129 336 / 166 458 / 370 557 / 550
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
6 / 11 0 / 0 101 / 130 42 / 29
82 / 210
43 / 27
168 / 81
288 / 101
372 / 356
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-2a
Existing Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes
595 / 712
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1423 / 56 38 / 130 0 / 0 14 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
547 / 707
111 / 66
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
104
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X S T UX S T UX STU X
da ZY da Z Yd a Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-2b
Existing Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes
41 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
45 / 180
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 58
0 / 0
110 / 276
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
48 / 251 0 / 0 0 / 3 181 / 46
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 168 / 170 163 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
46 / 114
0 / 0
0 / 0
209 / 813
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 66
167 / 669
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
70 / 117
11 / 43
0 / 0
15 / 57
29 / 112
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 439 / 336 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 217 / 599 609 / 748
11 / 43
0 / 0
135 / 519
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 55252 / 184 0 / 0 127 / 344 43 / 11
158 / 65
183 / 783
92 / 607
179 / 73
16 / 5
168 / 232
113 / 125 0 / 0 34 / 4 0 / 0
423 / 431
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
0 / 0
0 / 0
88 / 255 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
222 / 84 2 / 8 0 / 0
315 / 346 0 / 0 211 / 364 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
0 / 0
135 / 179
114 / 173
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
321 / 81
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
717 / 475 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
302 / 1188
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-2c
Existing Plus Total Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-3
Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project Traffic Volumes
163 / 570
92 / 58
85 / 28
21 / 32138 / 197 0 / 0 22 / 57 37 / 122
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 83
152 / 62
0 / 0
51 / 62 1 / 1 36 / 139 0 / 0
134 / 188
41 / 94
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
0 / 0
53 / 83 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
9 / 24 0 / 0 80 / 20
142 / 167 1 / 1 0 / 0 386 / 243
133 / 30
103 / 437
0 / 0
21 / 60
51 / 238
40 / 170
54 / 55
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
0 / 0
23 / 7
41 / 34
204 / 397
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 032 / 40 69 / 92 9 / 32 0 / 0
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
92 / 59
65 / 87
75 / 38 80 / 89 9 / 187 28 / 31
357 / 530
38 / 22
93 / 81
29 / 39
270 / 426
125 / 109
20 / 34 120 / 108 103 / 110 0 / 0
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
439 / 434 410 / 358 18 / 5 181 / 172
206 / 10
71 / 294
149 / 301
22 / 19
0 / 0
85 / 102
76 / 51
62 / 81
17 / 11
76 / 73
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
370 / 480
143 / 146
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 0 / 0 41 / 86 84 / 249
365 / 3
459 / 346
663 / 965
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 246 / 262
16 / 70
4 / 11
0 / 0
184 / 357
322 / 736
12 / 15
64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
40 / 26 383 / 425 719 / 693 439 / 327
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
239 / 279
318 / 423
54 / 60
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
63 / 46 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
n/a
107
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
228 / 151
3 / 1
295 / 376
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
272 / 132 375 / 428 550 / 801 523 / 729
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
0 / 0 103 / 367 65 / 90 19 / 31
157 / 537
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
350 / 553
155 / 63
12 / 3
21 / 1367 / 240 0 / 0 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
668 / 738
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
100 / 124
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
709 / 790
20 / 10
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 /
337 / 519 573 / 709 503 / 621 75 / 57
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
132 / 148 77 / 39 164 / 136 0 / 0
442 / 436
153 / 232
524 / 453
157 / 164
541 / 543
20 / 60
0 / 0
37 / 35100 / 227 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
411 / 545
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
7 / 16
91 / 253
20 / 151
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
65 / 42
53 / 145
4 / 13
362 / 70 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 447 / 360 7 / 15
118 / 129 334 / 164 456 / 368 555 / 548
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
5 / 11 0 / 0 101 / 130 42 / 29
82 / 210
43 / 27
157 / 75
288 / 101
371 / 354
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-3a
Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project Traffic Volumes
594 / 710
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1423 / 56 38 / 130 0 / 0 14 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
546 / 705
111 / 66
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X S T UX S T UX STU X
da ZY da Z Yd a Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-3b
Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project Traffic Volumes
41 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
39 / 169
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 58
0 / 0
110 / 276
0 / 0
0 / 0
1 / 2
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
36 / 230 0 / 0 0 / 2 154 / 43
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 168 / 170 163 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
46 / 114
0 / 0
0 / 0
192 / 771
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
16 / 65
156 / 649
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
70 / 117
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 56
29 / 111
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 429 / 300 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 206 / 579 588 / 692
11 / 43
0 / 0
129 / 497
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 55252 / 184 0 / 0 127 / 344 43 / 11
153 / 61
183 / 783
91 / 603
179 / 73
16 / 5
168 / 232
113 / 125 0 / 0 34 / 4 0 / 0
422 / 429
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
0 / 0
0 / 0
88 / 255 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
218 / 82 2 / 8 0 / 0
313 / 344 0 / 0 207 / 362 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
0 / 0
133 / 175
113 / 169
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
69 / 300
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
273 / 76
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
707 / 439 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
285 / 1146
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-3c
Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-4
Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project Traffic Volumes
149 / 516
80 / 47
85 / 28
21 / 32138 / 195 0 / 0 20 / 49 33 / 105
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
25 / 68
152 / 62
0 / 0
50 / 58 1 / 1 33 / 129 0 / 0
133 / 186
39 / 93
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
0 / 0
53 / 83 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
9 / 24 0 / 0 80 / 20
141 / 166 1 / 1 0 / 0 343 / 208
127 / 28
102 / 433
0 / 0
20 / 56
51 / 238
40 / 170
51 / 52
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
0 / 0
23 / 7
41 / 34
203 / 388
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 032 / 40 69 / 92 9 / 32 0 / 0
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
92 / 59
64 / 78
75 / 38 80 / 89 9 / 187 28 / 31
357 / 530
38 / 22
93 / 81
29 / 39
270 / 426
125 / 109
20 / 34 120 / 108 97 / 104 0 / 0
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
439 / 434 410 / 358 18 / 5 175 / 166
206 / 10
70 / 293
149 / 301
22 / 19
0 / 0
85 / 102
76 / 51
62 / 81
17 / 11
76 / 73
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
370 / 480
143 / 146
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 0 / 0 41 / 86 84 / 249
365 / 3
459 / 346
663 / 965
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 246 / 262
16 / 70
4 / 11
0 / 0
184 / 357
322 / 736
12 / 15
64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
40 / 26 382 / 424 718 / 692 439 / 327
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
238 / 278
318 / 423
54 / 60
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
62 / 45 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
n/a
111
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
201 / 127
3 / 1
295 / 376
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
256 / 119 370 / 424 545 / 797 518 / 725
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
0 / 0 93 / 331 65 / 90 19 / 31
146 / 495
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
347 / 547
146 / 55
12 / 3
21 / 1364 / 227 0 / 0 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
665 / 732
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
97 / 121
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
706 / 784
20 / 10
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 /
337 / 519 573 / 709 503 / 621 75 / 57
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
131 / 143 77 / 39 164 / 136 0 / 0
442 / 436
152 / 231
524 / 453
157 / 164
541 / 543
20 / 60
0 / 0
37 / 3599 / 225 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
411 / 545
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
7 / 16
88 / 240
20 / 148
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
62 / 40
53 / 145
4 / 13
362 / 70 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 447 / 360 7 / 15
118 / 129 331 / 162 453 / 366 552 / 546
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
4 / 10 0 / 0 101 / 130 42 / 29
82 / 210
43 / 27
148 / 67
288 / 101
371 / 351
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-4a
Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project Traffic Volumes
594 / 707
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1423 / 56 38 / 130 0 / 0 14 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
546 / 702
111 / 66
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X S T UX S T UX STU X
da ZY da Z Yd a Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-4b
Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project Traffic Volumes
41 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
32 / 139
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 58
0 / 0
110 / 276
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 1
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
24 / 177 0 / 0 0 / 2 127 / 35
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 168 / 170 163 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
46 / 114
0 / 0
0 / 0
172 / 697
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
16 / 64
143 / 596
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
70 / 116
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 55
28 / 109
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 420 / 263 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 193 / 526 566 / 602
11 / 43
0 / 0
122 / 476
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 54252 / 184 0 / 0 127 / 344 43 / 11
147 / 57
183 / 783
89 / 598
179 / 73
16 / 5
168 / 232
113 / 125 0 / 0 34 / 4 0 / 0
422 / 426
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
0 / 0
0 / 0
88 / 255 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
213 / 78 2 / 8 0 / 0
310 / 342 0 / 0 202 / 358 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
0 / 0
132 / 169
111 / 164
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
56 / 247
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
225 / 62
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
698 / 402 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
265 / 1072
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-4c
Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
25 / 13
370 / 582
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
62 / 45 0 / 0 64 / 48 53 / 74
1234
568 / 403 7 / 18 89 / 88
40 / 26 382 / 424 718 / 692 439 / 327
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
238 / 278
318 / 423
54 / 60
0 / 0 150 / 313 9 / 15 246 / 261
16 / 70
4 / 11
0 / 0
184 / 356
322 / 735
12 / 15
529 / 375
47 / 655 / 16 0 / 0 41 / 86 84 / 249
365 / 3
459 / 346
663 / 964
139 / 103
4 / 2
41 / 31
76 / 51
62 / 81
17 / 11
76 / 73
608 / 597
142 / 124
113 / 49
370 / 480
143 / 146
20 / 34 120 / 108 90 / 99 0 / 0
5678
76 / 118 72 / 81 95 / 114
439 / 434 410 / 358 18 / 5 168 / 161
206 / 10
70 / 293
149 / 301
22 / 19
0 / 0
85 / 102
75 / 38 80 / 89 9 / 187 28 / 31
357 / 530
38 / 22
93 / 81
29 / 39
270 / 426
125 / 109
0 / 0
0 / 032 / 40 69 / 92 9 / 32 0 / 0
691 / 585
64 / 81
8 / 28
26 / 6
92 / 58
62 / 70
48 / 49
377 / 567
23 / 40
1 / 1
0 / 0
23 / 7
41 / 34
201 / 380
0 / 0
53 / 83 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
9 / 24 0 / 0 80 / 20
139 / 165 1 / 1 0 / 0 299 / 173
121 / 26
101 / 429
0 / 0
19 / 52
51 / 238
40 / 170
49 / 54 1 / 1 31 / 121 0 / 0
133 / 184
38 / 92
571 / 463
63 / 86
1 / 1
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-5
Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project Traffic Volumes
135 / 461
66 / 36
85 / 28
21 / 32136 / 192 0 / 0 17 / 40 28 / 88
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
21 / 54
152 / 62
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
12 13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21 22 23
24 25
26 27
11 15
n/a
115
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y d a Z Yccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-5a
Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project Traffic Volumes
592 / 704
118 / 46
23 / 6
9 / 1423 / 56 38 / 130 0 / 0 14 / 34
0 / 0
0 / 0
544 / 699
111 / 66
3 / 2
351 / 245
4 / 10 0 / 0 101 / 130 42 / 29
82 / 210
43 / 27
137 / 59
288 / 101
369 / 348
0 / 0
362 / 70 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 20
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 447 / 360 7 / 15
118 / 129 329 / 159 451 / 363 550 / 543
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
30 / 43
14 / 10
18 / 9
7 / 15
85 / 227
18 / 145
221 / 63
0 / 2
316 / 487
60 / 37
53 / 145
4 / 13
0 / 0
37 / 3599 / 223 11 / 43 87 / 109 10 / 16
39 / 35
26 / 107
411 / 545
132 / 102
662 / 440
53 / 62
130 / 138 77 / 39 164 / 136 0 / 0
442 / 436
150 / 230
524 / 453
157 / 164
541 / 543
20 / 60
145 / 223 16 / 94 78 / 97 45 / 72
17 18 19 20
124 / 62 126 / 139 /
337 / 519 573 / 709 503 / 621 75 / 57
123 / 174
590 / 680
129 / 135
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
93 / 117
432 / 562
79 / 131
75 / 86
39 / 47
116 / 106
98 / 80
705 / 777
20 / 10
12 / 3
21 / 1361 / 214 0 / 0 4 / 11 18 / 28
28 / 1
391 / 366
664 / 725
22 / 23
7 / 4
12 / 21
0 / 0 85 / 295 65 / 90 19 / 31
137 / 453
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
346 / 540
135 / 47
17 / 19 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
325 / 451 60 / 48 33 / 47
241 / 106 365 / 420 540 / 793 513 / 721
131 / 128
7 / 8
66 / 68
35 / 30
19 / 5
21 / 23
172 / 105
3 / 1
295 / 376
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVWWWWS T U X S T UX S T UX STU X
da ZY da Z Yd a Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
81 / 154
535 / 709
44 / 51
0 / 0
129 / 161
110 / 158
40 / 46
46 / 71 177 / 357 88 / 255 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
209 / 74 2 / 8 0 / 0
308 / 339 0 / 0 198 / 354 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
113 / 125 0 / 0 34 / 4 0 / 0
420 / 423
146 / 115
596 / 588
54 / 75
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
14 / 53252 / 184 0 / 0 127 / 344 43 / 11
141 / 53
183 / 783
88 / 592
179 / 73
16 / 5
168 / 232
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 410 / 227 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 182 / 473 545 / 513
11 / 43
0 / 0
116 / 454
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
70 / 115
11 / 43
0 / 0
14 / 54
28 / 108
11 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
16 / 63
132 / 543
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
8 / 23
0 / 0
0 / 0
46 / 114
0 / 0
0 / 0
155 / 622
0 / 0
12 / 124 0 / 0 0 / 1 100 / 28
33 34 35 36
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 168 / 170 163 / 40
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
22 / 6
22 / 6
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-5b
Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project Traffic Volumes
41 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
25 / 109
0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
35 / 58
0 / 0
110 / 276
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 1
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
45 / 194
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
177 / 49
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
688 / 366 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
248 / 997
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 8-5c
Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

8.3 Intersection Analysis
Table 8-2 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Existing Plus Total Project conditions as well as the three scenarios.

As shown in the table, all intersec tions, including the project driveway s, are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday peak-hours with the addition of the Total Project traffic except for the following:

12. Bay Boulevard & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

With a 15 percent reduction in total project traffic in Scenario 1, one of the affected intersections would improve to LOS D or better. The following intersections would still operate at LOS E/F:

12. Bay Boulevard & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

With another 15 percent reduction in total project traffic in Scenario 2, an additional affected intersection would improve to LOS D or better. Th e following intersections wo uld still operate at LOS E/F:

12. Bay Boulevard & H Street (LOS E – PM Peak)

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

With the final 15 percent reduction in total projec t traffic in Scenario 3, an additional affected intersection would improve to LOS D or better. Th e following intersections wo uld still operate at LOS E/F:

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

Appendix F contains the intersection LOS worksheets.
119

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-2
Existing Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing
Conditions
Existing Plus
Total Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 3 Total
Project
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal AM 10.2 B 12.9 B 12.9 B 12.9 B 12.9 B PM 25.3 C 29.9 C 29.9 C 29.8 C 29.8 C
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 51.5 D 50.5 D 50.5 D 50.5 D 50.5 D PM 14.8 B 14.7 B 14.7 B 14.7 B 14.7 B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal AM 11.4 B 11.2 B 11.2 B 11.2 B 11.2 B PM 13.3 B 13.5 B 13.5 B 13.5 B 13.5 B
4 Broadway & E St Signal AM 42.0 D 42.2 D 42.2 D 42.2 D 42.2 D PM 46.7 D 47.7 D 47.6 D 47.6 D 47.4 D
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal AM 17.6 B 17.1 B 17.1 B 17.1 B 17.1 B PM 15.4 B 15.0 B 15.0 B 15.0 B 15.0 B
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal AM 39.3 D 39.1 D 39.1 D 39.1 D 39.1 D PM 39.9 D 40.0 D 40.0 D 40.0 D 40.0 D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 9.9 A 10.9 B 10.8 B 10.7 B 10.5 B PM 15.5 C 17.6 C 17.5 C 17.1 C 16.7 C
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC AM 9.0 A 9.3 A 9.2 A 9.2 A 9.2 A PM 10.2 B 10.9 B 10 .8 B 10.7 B 10.6 B
9 Broadway & F St Signal AM 41.3 D 40.9 D 40.9 D 40.8 D 40.8 D PM 43.2 D 42.8 D 42.8 D 42.9 D 42.8 D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC AM n/a4

PM
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 10.2 B 12.1 B 10.9 B 10.7 B 10.7 B PM 0.0 A 25.9 D 20.5 C 18.5 C 17.2 C
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 24.1 C 17.4 B 17.3 B 17.3 B 17.3 B PM 30.1 C 108.4 F 94.1 F 71.3 E 53.0 D
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology. 120
I I I

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-2
Existing Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing
Conditions
Existing Plus
Total Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 3 Total
Project
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal AM 30.2 C 24.9 C 25.1 C 25.3 C 25.4 C PM 45.2 D 35.7 D 36.3 D 37.3 D 38.4 D
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 10.4 B 12.3 B 12.1 B 11.9 B 11.7 B PM 11.8 B 28.5 C 24.5 C 18.8 B 15.4 B
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal AM 18.5 B 17.6 B 17 .6 B 17.7 B 17.7 B PM 15.7 B 15.3 B 15.3 B 15.3 B 15.4 B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal AM 30.4 C 29.6 C 29.7 C 29.7 C 29.8 C PM 26.6 C 25.7 C 25.8 C 25.9 C 25.9 C
17 Broadway & H St Signal AM 31.2 C 31.7 C 31.7 C 31.7 C 31.7 C PM 32.9 C 33.3 C 33.2 C 33.2 C 33.1 C
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal AM 42.6 D 43.6 D 43.6 D 43.6 D 43.6 D PM 19.0 B 18.8 B 18.8 B 18.8 B 18.8 B
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.4 D 44.4 D 44.4 D 44.4 D 44.4 D PM 37.9 D 37.8 D 37.8 D 37.8 D 37.8 D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina
Wy OWSC AM 9.6 A 9.9 A 9.9 A 9.9 A 9.9 A
PM 10.8 B 11.3 B 11.3 B 11.3 B 11.3 B
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AWSC AM 25.6 D 46.7 E 43.9 E 40.8 E 37.6 E PM 11.1 B 14.3 B 13.9 B 13.5 B 13.1 B
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.5 D 39.2 D 39.2 D 39.2 D 39.2 D PM 93.1 F 94.7 F 94.7 F 94.7 F 94.7 F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 27.2 C 27.6 C 27.6 C 27.5 C 27.5 C PM 17.4 B 17.3 B 17.3 B 17.3 B 17.3 B
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC AM 16.7 C 17.9 C 17.8 C 17.7 C 17.7 C PM 15.1 C 16.3 C 16.3 C 16.2 C 16.0 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis. 121

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-2
Existing Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing
Conditions
Existing Plus
Total Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total
Project
Existing Plus
Scenario 3
Total Project
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2 25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 45.0 D 45.6 D 45.5 D 45.5 D 45.5 D PM 46.9 D 48.1 D 48.0 D 47.9 D 47.8 D
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 10.9 B 11.6 B 11.5 B 11.4 B 11.4 B PM 139.3 F 152.3 F 151.8 F 150.7 F 149.6 F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal AM 11.9 B 12.2 B 12.2 B 12.2 B 12.2 B PM 42.6 D 44.1 D 44.2 D 44.3 D 44.4 D
28 W Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM A 9.5 A 9.5 A 9.5 A 9.5 A PM A 9.3 A 9.3 A 9.3 A 9.3 A
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM A 9.7 A 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.8 A PM A 10.0 A 10.0 A 10.0 A 9.9 A
30 E Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM A 9.5 A 9.5 A 9.5 A 9.5 A PM A 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.8 A
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM A 15.9 C 15.4 C 14.8 B 14.3 B PM A >300 F >300 F 265.3 F 182.3 F
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM A 11.9 B 11.8 B 11.7 B 11.5 B PM A 14.7 B 14.1 B 13.2 B 12.4 B
36 PA-A Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM A 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.6 A 8.6 A PM A 10.4 B 10.3 B 10.0 A 9.8 A
37 H St & PA-A Proj Dwy OWSC AM A 14.4 B 13.6 B 12.9 B 12.3 B PM A 15.3 C 14.1 B 12.5 B 11.4 B
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. This intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

122

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

8.4 Project Fair Share
Table 8-3 summarizes the Project’s fair share of new tr affic added to the intersections that would operate at LOS E or F under the Existing Plus Total Project conditions as well as the three scenarios.

Shaded cells would indicate the scenario where the respective intersection would operate at LOS E/F.

As shown in the table, the Project would contribute between 3.6 percent and 61.6 percent at the affected intersections under the Existing Plus Total Project scenario. Scenario 1 would result in the Project contributing between 3.4 percent and 54.9 percent at th e affected intersections. Scenario 2 would result in the Project contributing between 3.2 percent and 51.6 percent at the affected intersections. Scenario 3 would result in the Project contributing between 3.0 percent and 9.3 percent at the affected intersections.

8.5 Improvements
Table 8-4 summarizes the proposed improvements at the a ffected intersections under the Existing Plus Total Project conditions as well as the three scenarios. Figure 8-6 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections.

As shown in the table, the Project would be fully responsible for signal retiming at the Bay Boulevard & H Street and I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street inters ections and constructing a traffic signal at the Project Driveway & H Street intersection. The Pr oject would contribute its fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal at the Bay Boulevard & J Street and Bay Boulevard & L Street i n t e r s e c t i o n s . I t s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t b o t h signal installations correspond with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (BAY-28 #5 and #6). All proposed improvements would achieve LOS D or better conditions during both peak periods.

Scenarios 1 and 2 would result in the same improvements and responsibility as the Total Project scenario.

Scenario 3 would result in the same improvements and responsibility as the previous scenarios, but with the removal of the Bay Boulevard & H Street intersection.

Appendix J contains the intersection LOS worksheets with the improvements.

123

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-3
Existing Plus Total Project Fair Share
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus Total
Proj
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total Proj
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total Proj
Existing Plus
Scenario 3 Total Proj
Traffic
Volumes
% Proj
Traffic
Volumes
% Proj
Traffic
Volumes
% Proj
Traffic
Volumes
% Proj Proj Total Proj Total Proj Total Proj Total
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM 501 904 55.4% 435 838 51.9% 371 774 47.9% 302 705 42.8% PM 738 1,464 50.4% 632 1,358 46.5% 527 1,253 42.1% 418 1,144 36.5% 21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AM 165 1,223 13.5% 150 1,208 12.4% 134 1,192 11.2% 120 1,178 10.2% PM 210 1,101 19.1% 188 1,079 17.4% 161 1,052 15.3% 140 1,031 13.6% 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM 53 1,487 3.6% 51 1,485 3.4% 47 1,481 3.2% 44 1,478 3.0% PM 61 1,459 4.2% 56 1,454 3.9% 51 1,449 3.5% 47 1,445 3.3% 26 Bay Blvd & L St AM 108 949 11.4% 98 939 10.4% 87 928 9.4% 74 915 8.1% PM 145 1,602 9.1% 128 1,585 8.1% 111 1,568 7.1% 90 1,547 5.8% 31 Proj Dwy & H St AM 764 894 85.5% 728 858 84.8% 690 820 84.1% 654 784 83.4% PM 1,689 1,943 86.9% 1,549 1,803 85.9% 1,411 1,665 84.7% 1,271 1,525 83.3% Notes:

Only intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the Project are shown in the table.

The fair share calculations are based on actual traffic volumes and do not include PCE adjustments.

Shaded cells represent intersections that would operate at LOS E/F.

124

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-4
Existing Plus Total Project Improvements
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus
Total Project
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 17.4 B 33.3 C 15.9 Signal retiming 100% PM 108.4 F 44.1 D -64.3 21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 46.7 E 29.6 C -17.1 Signalize Intersection4 Fair Share PM 14.3 B 17.5 B 3.2 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.2 D 17.0 B -22.2 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.7 F 29.0 C -65.7 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 11.6 B 10.9 B -0.7 Signalize Intersection5 Fair Share PM 152.3 F 19.3 B -133.0 31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 16.3 C 10.3 B -6.0 Signalize Intersection 100% PM >300 F 21.3 C ->300 # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus
Scenario 1 Total
Project
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 17.3 B 33.0 C 15.7 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.1 F 42.9 D -51.2 21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 43.9 E 28.6 C -15.3 Signalize Intersection4 Fair Share PM 13.9 B 16.9 B 3.0 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.2 D 17.0 B -22.2 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.7 F 28.9 C -65.8 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 11.5 B 9.6 A -1.9 Signalize Intersection5 Fair Share PM 151.8 F 19.1 B -132.7 31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 15.8 C 10.2 B -5.6 Signalize Intersection 100% PM >300 F 18.9 B ->300 Notes:

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

125
111~1 I

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 8-4
Existing Plus Total Project Improvements (cont.)
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus
Scenario 2 Total
Project
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 17.3 B 32.9 C 15.6 Signal retiming 100% PM 71.3 E 49.8 D -21.5 21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 40.8 E 28.0 C -10.7 Signalize Intersection4 Fair Share PM 13.5 B 16.7 B 3.5 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.2 D 17.0 B -22.3 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.7 F 28.9 C -65.7 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 11.4 B 9.5 A -1.9 Signalize Intersection5 Fair Share PM 150.7 F 18.8 B -131.1 31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 15.2 C 10.1 B -5.1 Signalize Intersection 100% PM 288.2 F 15.1 B -273.1 # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus
Scenario 3 Total
Project
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 37.6 E 27.2 C -9.2 Signalize Intersection4 Fair Share PM 13.1 B 16.2 B 3.3 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 39.2 D 17.0 B -22.3 Signal retiming 100% PM 94.7 F 28.9 C -65.7 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 11.4 B 14.0 B 2.7 Signalize Intersection5 Fair Share PM 149.6 F 18.5 B -130.6 31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 14.7 B 9.9 A -4.8 Signalize Intersection 100% PM 198.5 F 12.9 B -185.6 Notes:

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

5. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

126
111~11
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

Signal Retiming
Scenario Applicable[#, #, #]
[Total, 1, 2]
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
127
• • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., oy +-
e • 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 0 • 4 • --+- --+- ~ ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~
~.~ +- A ~ ~ ~~ ., • .J.
~ttr 4 .J. 0
~
--+-
~tr --+- ~ y ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-y --+---+-
• • ~-
~ N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

ANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woo
dlawn Ave
Br
oadway
5th Ave
4t
h Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woo
dlawn Ave
Oa
klawn Ave
Bay
Blvd
Marina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Sandpiper Wy
Gunpowder
Point Dr
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 8-6a
Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Signal Retiming
Scenario Applicable[#, #, #]
[Total, 1, 2, 3]
[Total, 1, 2, 3]
[Total, 1, 2, 3]
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
128
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~
~~
~
~~ 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~tt,,- • .J. _.
~t.-
_.
.J. T ~~ _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f"
•
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 8-6b
Existing Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements 29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St
28 29
30 31
32 33
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLAN
NING AREA B-1
PL

North / South & East / West
Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Signal Retiming
Scenario Applicable[#, #, #]
[Total, 1, 2, 3]
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
129
y y ~ ..... ~ +-
T
G
V T
G
V
~
---. ---.
• • • •
~ ~
• +-
y ~ ~
• +-
---. ---. T
G
V ---.
---.
•
s

IC CONSU

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

8.6 Queuing Analysis
A queuing analysis was performed at the Project Drivew ay & H Street intersections where a traffic signal is being proposed to determine the appropriate turn pocket lengths. The queue length reported is the 95th percentile queue length, which represents the qu eue length where 95 percent of the queue lengths fall and only would be exceeded 5 percent of the time. Table 8-5 summarizes the results of the queuing analyses.

As shown in the table, the 95
th percentile queue lengths would be co ntained within the respective turn pockets except for the following movement:

 Project Driveway & H Street: Southbound left-turn lane

The 95
th percentile queue length is estimated to surpa ss the allocated storage space by 25 feet. The allocated storage length, set at 325 feet, denotes th e distance between the stop bar and the upstream internal intersection. However, th ere is sufficient extra capacity on the internal streets to handle the increased queue lengths.

Appendix L contains the queuing analyses worksheets.

Table 8-5
Existing Plus Total Project Queuing Analysis Summary
Intersection
Peak
Hour Movement
Storage Length
(ft)1
Queue Length (ft)2
Existing Plus Total Proj
31 Proj Dwy & H St
AM EB LT 170 37
PM 18
AM SB LT 325 73
PM 350
AM SB RT 325 9
PM 17
Notes:

Values shown in bold indicate movements where the queue length exceeds the available storage length.

1. The storage length was based on the latest site plan prepared for the project and/or conceptual plans for the traffic signal.

2. The queue length shown represents the 95th percentile queue length for each respective movement and reported from Synchro 11.

130

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
9 OPENING YEAR PLUS TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
This section summarizes the operations at the study area intersections with the Total Project traffic (Project-Level and Programmatic-Level) added to the Opening Year 2026 street network.

9.1 Roadway Network
The lane configuration and traffic controls for th e Opening Year Plus Total Project conditions are consistent with the Opening Year Conditions as shown in Figure 6-1 with the following exceptions:

 Planning Area A Project Driveway & G Street (Int #36): Construct south leg and stop controlled.

Figure 9-1 illustrates the intersection geometrics at the study area intersections and includes the project driveways.

9.2 Traffic Volumes
The Opening Year Plus Total Project traffic volumes we re determined by adding the Total Project traffic volumes to the Opening Year traffic volumes.

Figure 9-2 illustrates the Opening Year Plus Total Project traffic volumes.

131
1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 9-1
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics 7 Bay Blvd & F St
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

OVL
OVL
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
132
• • • •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+- ~ .. ~ +- ~~ A ., ., ey +-
• • e
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr -4• • -4• --+- --+- y ~~ y T --+-
• • • •
~ +-~.~ +-
~ ~~ ., A ~ y
• .J.
~ttr -4 .J. •
~
--+-
~tr --+- y
T ~
• • • •
+-+-
~~ ., ~ ., +-
--+- 1 ~·~
--+-
T --+---+-
• • ~-
N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 9-1a
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
133
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~ ~~
~
~~
~
'f" A~ • 'f" 'f" e
.J. ~tt,,- -4 .J. 0 • ~t.-
_.
.J. _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
~ _.,. 'f" 'f" e •
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 9-1b
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics 29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St 33 Marina Pkwy & H St 34 Marina Pkwy & Street C 35 Street A & J St PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
134
• • • •
~ ~
~ 44-~ +-
.. ~
~
JK f'" f'" JK~~ +-
•
+- +-
_. ~
~~ t~
~ _. _. _.
~
_.
• • • •

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
36 PA-A Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 9-1c
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
37 PA-A Proj Dwy & H St
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.
37 36
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
135
• •
s
ZUTA

IC CONSUL
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps / Bay Blvd & E St I-5 NB Ramps & E St Woodlawn Ave & E St Broadway & E St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
d a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yd a Z Yccccb b bb
5th Ave & E St 4th Ave & E St Bay Blvd & F St Woodlawn Ave & F St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Broadw ay & F St Marina Pkw y & G St Bay Blvd & G St Bay Blvd & H St

VVV VWWW WSTU X ST U X ST UX STU X
da Z Y daZY da Z Yd aZYccc cb b bb
29 / 24
547 / 607
278 / 795
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
7 / 28
100 / 65 0 / 0 66 / 49 55 / 76
1234
568 / 403 7 / 19 92 / 91
63 / 66 445 / 497 740 / 714 451 / 337
8 / 7
6 / 8
15 / 12
247 / 287
328 / 436
56 / 62
0 / 0 159 / 320 9 / 15 253 / 271
52 / 104
4 / 11
0 / 0
210 / 569
361 / 965
18 / 31
545 / 386
48 / 675 / 16 0 / 0 42 / 89 86 / 256
365 / 3
488 / 358 682 / 993
143 / 106
4 / 2
42 / 32
78 / 53
64 / 83
18 / 11
78 / 75
626 / 615
146 / 128
116 / 50
381 / 493
147 / 150
21 / 35 124 / 111 135 / 142 0 / 0
5678
78 / 122 72 / 81 98 / 117
451 / 447 422 / 369 57 / 30 257 / 233
364 / 25
128 / 323
149 / 301
23 / 20
0 / 0
88 / 105
77 / 39 82 / 92 17 / 343 29 / 32
367 / 545
39 / 23
96 / 83
30 / 40
278 / 438
129 / 112
0 / 0
0 / 033 / 41 71 / 95 9 / 220 0 / 0
712 / 603
66 / 83
22 / 65
214 / 6
110 / 115
82 / 115
58 / 58
388 / 584
24 / 41
24 / 32
0 / 0
46 / 38
42 / 35
242 / 473
0 / 0
55 / 86 0 / 0 0 / 0 32 / 18
91 0 1 11 2
25 / 44 0 / 0 223 / 40
211 / 225 1 / 1 0 / 0 804 / 845
216 / 72
137 / 668
0 / 0
39 / 87
61 / 355
52 / 311
53 / 65 17 / 21 76 / 245 0 / 0
168 / 255
44 / 99
588 / 477
65 / 89
1 / 1
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 9-2
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
536 / 957
106 / 66
203 / 45
21 / 32142 / 205 0 / 0 52 / 177 40 / 132
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
149 / 144
357 / 79
0 / 0
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
136
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est I-5 SB Ramps & H St I-5 NB Ramps & H St Woodlawn Ave & H St Oaklawn Ave & H St

V VVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccb b bb
Broadway & H St 5th Ave & H St 4th Ave & H St Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X ST U X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y daZYccccbbbb
Bay Blvd & J St I-5 SB Ramps & J St I-5 NB Ramps & J St Oaklawn Ave & J St

V V VVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbb b
470 / 473
3 / 1
297 / 378
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
257 / 367 0 / 0 18 / 20 6 / 12
13 14 15 16
326 / 454 62 / 49 34 / 48
593 / 433 507 / 604 569 / 828 542 / 754
135 / 132
7 / 8
68 / 70
36 / 31
20 / 5
22 / 24
0 / 0 287 / 583 67 / 93 20 / 32
385 / 784
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
489 / 698
351 / 198
12 / 3
22 / 13140 / 421 0 / 0 4 / 11 19 / 29
28 / 1
391 / 366
688 / 761
23 / 24
7 / 4
12 / 22
106 / 129
445 / 579
81 / 135
77 / 89
40 / 48
120 / 109
101 / 82
731 / 814
21 / 10
149 / 230 16 / 97 80 / 100 0 / 0
17 18 19 20
128 / 64 130 / 143 329 / 519
347 / 535 590 / 730 518 / 640 45 / 72
127 / 179
608 / 701
133 / 139
10 / 16
0 / 0
409 / 418
138 / 154 79 / 40 169 / 140 4 / 13
455 / 449
157 / 239
540 / 467
162 / 169
557 / 559
21 / 62
0 / 0
0 / 0104 / 234 11 / 44 90 / 112 0 / 0
40 / 36
27 / 110
423 / 561
136 / 105
682 / 453
55 / 64
7 / 17
100 / 323
26 / 207
274 / 268
0 / 2
321 / 491
121 / 51
37 / 35
0 / 0
363 / 71 222 / 274 0 / 0 11 / 21
21 22 23 24
0 / 0 449 / 366 7 / 15
306 / 632 536 / 476 604 / 534 707 / 722
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
31 / 44
14 / 10
19 / 9
6 / 11 0 / 0 308 / 218 43 / 30
533 / 455
137 / 201
232 / 91
288 / 102
640 / 563
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 9-2a
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
729 / 871
123 / 50
24 / 6
9 / 14151 / 155 173 / 205 0 / 0 16 / 37
0 / 0
0 / 0
681 / 868
169 / 217
3 / 2
351 / 245
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
137
I
N
:Di
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est Broadw ay & J St Bay Blvd & L St Industrial Blvd & L St W Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZY d a Z Yc c ccb b bb
Mid Proj Dw y & G St E Proj Dw y & G St Proj Dw y & H St Emp Proj Dw y & H St

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU XS T U X S TU X
d a Z Y d a Z Yd aZY d aZYccccbbbb
Marina Pkw y & H St Marina Pkw y & Street C Street A & J St PA-A Proj Dw y & G St

VVVVW W WWSTU X S TU X S T UX STU X
da Z Y da ZY d aZ Y da Z Yc c ccb bbb
83 / 159
551 / 730
45 / 53
0 / 0
177 / 229
206 / 285
41 / 47
47 / 73 177 / 357 91 / 263 51 / 13
25 26 27 28
331 / 210 2 / 8 0 / 0
457 / 512 0 / 0 325 / 500 22 / 85
7 / 6
14 / 7
4 / 3
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
116 / 129 0 / 0 35 / 4 0 / 0
551 / 582
150 / 118
614 / 606
56 / 77
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
14 / 55260 / 190 0 / 0 131 / 354 43 / 11
207 / 122
183 / 783
186 / 736
184 / 75
16 / 5
173 / 239
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
86 / 21
11 / 43
51 / 13 60 / 15 0 / 0 0 / 0
29 30 31 32
0 / 0 439 / 336 188 / 47
114 / 69 103 / 26 612 / 1199 1004 / 1348
11 / 43
0 / 0
135 / 519
47 / 187
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0 0 / 0 43 / 11 0 / 0
70 / 117
11 / 43
0 / 0
15 / 57
29 / 112
11 / 43
0 / 0
0 / 043 / 11 43 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0
0 / 0
17 / 66
528 / 1030
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
23 / 31
65 / 95
127 / 159
0 / 0
173 / 293
22 / 85
179 / 238
570 / 1174
0 / 0
77 / 364 230 / 97 0 / 3 181 / 46
33 34 35 36
86 / 36 58 / 227 0 / 0
184 / 246 0 / 0 397 / 625 163 / 40
29 / 12
0 / 0
230 / 97
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
29 / 36 0 / 0 7 / 28 0 / 0
119 / 148
86 / 115
103 / 114
137 / 55
0 / 0
0 / 0
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 9-2b
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
41 / 162
0 / 0
0 / 0
45 / 180
61 / 77 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0
232 / 295
58 / 227
462 / 528
0 / 0
0 / 0
2 / 2
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
W
oodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
W
oodlawn Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
M
arina Pkwy
Marina Wy
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
Street B
28 29
30 31
32 138
~ /\
i:~ ,\\ t \i\ ~ •\' ,\f- ;\ ,\\
~.'1. ~,.-;. t.~t i ~ .,. i~ ~,~ ... ~ -z,
.~ -. .---:::. .
\~ ~-
\
xx / yy = AM / PM Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
The naming convention for intersections is North / South & East / W est PA-A Proj Dwy & H St & & &

V VVVW WWWS TU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yc cccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
& & & &

VVVVWWWWSTU X STU X STU X STU X
da Z Y da Z Y da Z Y da Z Yccccbbbb
80 / 320
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
321 / 81
0 / 0 / / /
37 000
/ / /
720 / 478 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
303 / 1193
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
/
/
/
/
0 / 0 / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
0000
/ / /
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/ /
/
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Figure 9-2c
Opening Year 2026 With Project Traffic Volumes
/
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/ /
/
/
/
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

9.3 Intersection Analysis
Table 9-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Opening Year Plus Total Project conditions.

2. I-5 Northbound Ramps & E Street (LOS E – AM Peak)

7. Bay Boulevard & F Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

11. Bay Boulevard & G Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

12. Bay Boulevard & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

14. I-5 Northbound Ramps & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

21. Bay Boulevard & J Street (LOS F – AM & PM Peak)

22. I-5 Southbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

23. I-5 Northbound Ramps & J Street (LOS F – AM Peak)

25. Broadway & J Street (LOS E – PM Peak)

26. Bay Boulevard & L Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

31. Project Driveway & H Street (LOS F – PM Peak)

Appendix F contains the intersection LOS worksheets.
140

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-1
Opening Year Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year 2026
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
1 I-5 SB Ramps & E St Signal AM 18.7 B 20.7 C
PM 35.7 D 38.3 D
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 57.1 E 56.5 E
PM 15.4 B 15.5 B
3 Woodlawn Ave & E St Signal AM 11.7 B 11.4 B
PM 13.7 B 13.9 B
4 Broadway & E St Signal AM 42.8 D 43.2 D
PM 48.1 D 49.2 D
5 Fifth Ave & E St Signal AM 17.5 B 17.0 B
PM 15.3 B 14.9 B
6 Fourth Ave & E St Signal AM 40.1 D 40.0 D
PM 40.4 D 40.4 D
7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 17.9 C 25.0 C
PM 31.6 D 40.8 E
8 Woodlawn Ave & F St AWSC AM 9.5 A 9.9 A
PM 11.2 B 12.3 B
9 Broadway & F St Signal AM 40.0 D 39.7 D
PM 42.0 D 41.9 D
10 Marina Pkwy & G St OWSC AM n/a4 PM
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 16.3 C 31.2 D
PM 22.3 C >300 F
12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 22.1 C 38.5 D
PM 38.0 D 203.6 F
13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St Signal AM 21.9 C 23.0 C
PM 34.1 C 32.1 C
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 13.5 B 16.9 B
PM 22.3 C 97.0 F
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St Signal AM 19.1 B 18.2 B
PM 15.8 B 15.5 B
16 Oaklawn Ave & H St Signal AM 30.6 C 29.9 C
PM 26.3 C 25.5 C
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average co ntrol delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst move ment at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

141
I I I ~

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-1
Opening Year Plus Total Project Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary (cont.) # Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year
2026
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
17 Broadway & H St Signal AM 31.1 C 31.5 C
PM 32.9 C 33.4 C
18 Fifth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.3 D 46.0 D
PM 19.0 B 18.8 B
19 Fourth Ave & H St Signal AM 44.9 D 44.9 D
PM 38.5 D 38.4 D
20 Marina Pkwy & Marina Wy Signal AM 7.5 A 7.9 A
PM 10.0 A 11.4 B
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AWSC AM 107.2 F 164.5 F
PM 65.5 F 105.7 F
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 50.2 D 49.7 D
PM 30.9 C 87.7 F
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 111.9 F 112.0 F
PM 20.2 C 42.8 D
24 Oaklawn Ave & J St AWSC AM 25.9 D 28.8 D
PM 23.3 C 26.6 D
25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 50.6 D 52.5 D
PM 51.8 D 56.7 E
26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 12.9 B 14.7 B
PM 154.8 F 166.1 F
27 Industrial Blvd & L St Signal AM 12.2 B 12.6 B
PM 45.1 D 48.0 D
28 W Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.5 A
PM 9.3 A
29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.7 A
PM 10.0 A
30 E Proj Dwy & G St OWSC AM n/a5 9.5 A
PM 9.8 A
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 36.6 E
PM >300 F
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM n/a5 14.9 B
PM 28.6 D
Notes:

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes in order to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

142

AWSC: All-Way Stopped Control, OWSC: One-Way Stopped Control, Signal: Traffic Signal

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. The westbound approach was modified with a maximum of three approach lanes to comply with HCM6 methodology.

4. This intersection was removed from the analysis since it fell below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold warranting analysis.

5. The intersection will be constructed as part of the project.

9.4 Project Fair Share
Table 9-2 summarizes the Project’s fair share of new tr affic added to the intersections that would operate at LOS E or F under the Opening Year Plus To tal Project conditions. As shown in the table, the Project would contribute between 2.1 percent and 58.2 percent at the affected intersections under the Opening Year Plus Total Project scenario.

143

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-2
Opening Year Plus Total Project Fair Share
# Intersection
Peak
Hour
Opening Year Plus Total Proj
Traffic Volumes1
% Proj Proj Total
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St AM 54 2,396 2.3%
PM 55 2,568 2.1%
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM 80 1,329 6.0%
PM 106 1,737 6.1%
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM 266 947 28.1%
PM 406 1,345 30.2%
12 Bay Blvd & H St AM 501 1,939 25.8%
PM 738 2,712 27.2%
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St AM 212 2,309 9.2%
PM 337 2,811 12.0%
21 Bay Blvd & J St 3 AM 165 2,214 7.5%
PM 210 2,258 9.3%
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St AM 53 2,148 2.5%
PM 61 2,260 2.7%
23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St AM 50 2,547 2.0%
PM 55 2,435 2.3%
25 Broadway & J St AM 44 2,956 1.5%
PM 53 3,261 1.6%
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM 108 1,241 8.7%
PM 145 1,947 7.4%
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM 764 1,650 46.3%
PM 1,689 2,904 58.2%
Notes:

Only intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the Project are shown in the table.

The fair share calculations are based on actual traffic volumes and do not include PCE adjustments.

9.5 Improvements
Table 9-3 summarizes the proposed improvements at the affected intersections under the Opening Year Plus Total Project conditions. Figure 9-3 illustrates the proposed improvements at the affected intersections.

As shown in the table, the Project would be fully responsible for signalizing the Bay Boulevard & G Street and Project Driveway & H Street intersection s and retiming the signals at the I-5 Northbound Ramps & E Street, Bay Boulevard & H Street, I-5 Northbound Ramps & H Street, and I-5 Northbound and Southbound Ramps & J Street intersections. The Project would contribute its fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal or roundabout at the Bay Boulevard & F Street. The Project would contribute its fair share towards the construction of a traffic signal at the J Street and L Street intersections with Bay Boulevard. All proposed improvements would achieve LOS D or better conditions during both peak periods except for the roundabout at Bay Boulevard & F Street. Appendix J contains the intersection LOS worksheets with the improvements.
144

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-3
Opening Year Plus Total Project Improvements
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St Signal AM 56.5 E 45.3 D -11.0 Signal retiming 100% PM 15.5 B 15.5 B 0.0 7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 25.0 C 8.6 A -16.4 Signalize intersection Fair Share PM 40.8 E 30.7 C -10.1 7 Bay Blvd & F St AWSC AM 25.0 C 15.7 C -9.3 Construct
roundabout6 Fair Share PM 40.8 E 57.3 F 16.5
11 Bay Blvd & G St OWSC AM 31.2 D 9.9 A -21.3 Signalize intersection 100% PM >300 F 28.5 C ->300 12 Bay Blvd & H St Signal AM 38.5 D 22.5 C -16.0 Restripe SB approach Signal retiming
7 100% PM 203.6 F 36.2 D -167.4
14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St Signal AM 16.9 B 15.7 B -1.2 Signal retiming 100% PM 97.0 F 25.1 C -71.9 21 Bay Blvd & J St AWSC AM 164.5 F 36.3 D -128.2 Signalize intersection4 Fair Share PM 105.7 F 24.4 C -81.3
22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St Signal AM 49.7 D 22.3 C -27.4 Signal retiming 100% PM 87.7 F 31.6 C -56.1 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St Signal AM 112.0 F 53.5 D -58.5 Signal retiming 100% PM 42.8 D 25.0 C -17.8 25 Broadway & J St Signal AM 52.5 D 52.5 D 0.0 Signal retiming 100% PM 56.7 E 39.7 D -17.0 26 Bay Blvd & L St AWSC AM 14.7 B 11.9 B -2.8 Signalize intersection5 Fair Share PM 166.1 F 25.8 C -140.3

145
111~11

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-3
Opening Year Plus Total Project Improvements (cont.)
# Intersection
Traffic
Control
Peak
Hour
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
With
Improvements
 Improvement
Project
Responsibility3 Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
31 Proj Dwy & H St OWSC AM 36.6 E 9.8 A -26.8 Signalize intersection 100% PM >300 F 36.0 D ->300 Notes:

1. Delays are reported as the average control delay for the entire intersection at signalized intersections and the worst movement at unsignalized intersections.

2. LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM6) and performed using Synchro 11.

3. Based on the criteria shown in Table 2-4.

4. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #5.

5. The signal installation corresponds with the Bayfront Transportation Development Impact Fee Nexus Study projects BAY-28 #6.

6. Improvement is based on the 30% conceptual design and includes 1-lane approaches on all legs. The feasibility of expanding the roundabout and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.

7. Improvement is considered a conceptual design whose feasibility, including adequacy of turn bay storage and other operational issues is subject to City review and confirmation.
146
1 I-5 SB Ramps/Bay Blvd & E St 2 I-5 NB Ramps & E St 3 Woodlawn Ave & E St 4 Broadway & E St 5 5th Ave & E St 6 4th Ave & E St 8 Woodlawn Ave & F St 9 Broadway & F St 10 Marina Pkwy & G St 11 Bay Blvd & G St 12 Bay Blvd & H St 13 I-5 SB Ramps & H St 14 I-5 NB Ramps & H St
Figure 9-3
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Intersection Control
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Improvements are shown in green.

OVL
OVL
Signal Retiming
7 Bay Blvd & F St
Note:

This intersection contains 2
proposed improvements
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
147
~ ~ ~
+~ +- ~
+
+- _.) ++ ~ +-., +- ., .,
-+
1 ♦,.- .J. ~,..
.J.
~ttr -+ ~,.. -+ -+
~ -+ T T -+
• • • • +
~ ~ ~ ~
+
+- _.)++ ~ +-
4 A ., ., +-
• 0
.J.
4 .J.
~ttr 4 • -+ -+
+ y T -+
• • •
♦
•
~
~.~ +- A ~ ~ +~ ., • .J.
~ttr 4 .J. ~t
-+
~tr -+ T y ~
• • • •
+-+-
_.)~
., .,
-+ 1 ~•,.--+ y -+ -+
• • ~-
~ N
W+E
s
M ZUTA

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
15 Woodlawn Ave & H St 16 Oaklawn Ave & H St 17 Broadway & H St 18 5th Ave & H St 19 4th Ave & H St 20 Marina Wy & Marina Pkwy 21 Bay Blvd & J St 22 I-5 SB Ramps & J St 23 I-5 NB Ramps & J St 24 Oaklawn Ave & J St 25 Broadway & J St 26 Bay Blvd & L St 27 Industrial Blvd & L St
Figure 9-3a
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Improvements are shown in green.

Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Signal Retiming
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
148
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~
~
~ .. ~~ 'f" ~.~
~
'f" 'f" 'f" 'f"
.J. ~t.-
.J. ♦ 1 ~~tt~
.J.
~t~ _. _. _. _.
~ ~
_.
~ _.
~
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~
~ .. ~ 'f" ~ ~~
~
~~ 'f" A~ 'f"
.J. ~tt,,- -4 .J.
~t.-
_.
.J. _. _. _. ~ ~
~
• • • •
~
~ ~ .. ~
~
.~ ~ ~
_.,. 'f" 'f"
•
.J.
~~ 4 • • .J. ~t~ t~ _.
~ ♦ _. _.
~
• • • •
•

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
28 W Proj Dwy & G St
Figure 9-3b
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements 29 Mid Proj Dwy & G St 30 E Proj Dwy & G St

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
31 Proj Dwy & H St
32 Emp Proj Dwy & H St 33 Marina Pkwy & H St 34 Marina Pkwy & Street C 35 Street A & J St PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Improvements are shown in green.

Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Signal Retiming
37 36
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
149
• • • •
~ ~
~ ~~ +-
.. ~
~
~ f'" f'" ~~~ +-
•
+- +-
_. ~
~~ t~
~ _. _. _.
~
_.
• • • •

TRAFFIC CONSULTING
Figure 9-3c
Opening Year 2026 Plus Total Project Intersection Geometrics With Improvements

H STREET

G STREET

G&ETATION

SDG&E EASEMENT

MARINA PARKWAY
G 1SFTRIAL BLDG 3PRINT: 108,400 SFCLR. HGT: 32'
320'
185'
26' 26'
40'
26'
60' 50'
468'
265'
132'
46'
125'
52'TYP.
15'
16'
15'

CITY PUMP

STATION
INDUSTRIAL BLDG 4
FOOTPRINT: 172,800 SF
CLR. HGT: 32'
54'TYP.
50'
220'
756'
60' 60'
130'
364'
60'
50'
TYP.
25'
245'
60'
50'
50'45'
52'TYP.
54'TYP.

AL BLDG 2
: 102,730 SFHGT: 32'
575'
214'

SUITE B
24,452 SF

SUITE A
26,913 SF

SUITE C
24,452 SF

SUITE D
26,913 SF

3.39 ACRES

0.40 ACRES

1.22 ACRES

4.35 ACRES
Conceptual Site P
PLANNING AREA B-2
PLANNING AREA B-1

PLANNING AREA A
H St
G St
F St
E St
Woodlawn Ave
Broadway
5th
Ave
4th
Ave
3rd Ave
J St
LSt
Woodlawn
Ave
Oaklawn Ave
Bay Blvd
Marina P
kwy
Marina Wy
Lagoon Dr
Gunpowder Point Dr
E St S
Sandpiper Wy
H St
G St
E St N
Street C
Street A
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1010
1212
1313 1414
1616
1717
1818
1919
2020
2121 2222 2323
2424 2525
2626
2727
1111
1515
3535
3434
3333
28 29
30 31
32 33
LEGEND
Naming Convention:

North / South & East / West
Improvements are shown in green.

Intersection Control
Free MovementF
Right-Turn OverlapOVL
Signal Retiming
37 36
36 PA-A Proj Dwy & G St 37 PA-A Proj Dwy & H St
Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
150
• •
s
ZUTA

IC CONSUL

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis

9.6 Signal Warrants
The signal warrant analysis was performed at the locations where a traffic signal is proposed using the criteria outlined in Chapter 4C of the California Manual on Uniform Tra ffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2014, Revision 7 for Warrant 3, Peak-Hour. It should be no ted that the signal warrant analysis was not performed where the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 9-4 summarizes the results of the peak-hour signal warrant analyses under the Total Project traffic scenarios.

As shown in the table, the traffic signal warrant was satisfied using the peak-hour traffic volume criteria under the Existing Plus Total Project Traffic scenario at three of the five intersections for a minimum of one of the peak-hours. Under the Opening Year With Total Project scenario, all intersections would satisfy the peak-hour signal warrant for a minimum of one of the peak-hours.

Appendix K contains the signal warrant analyses worksheets and supporting data.

Table 9-4
Total Project Traffic Peak-Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary # Intersection
Peak
Hour
Warrant 3 Met?1
Existing Plus Total
Proj
Opening Year 2026
w/Total Proj
7 Bay Blvd & F St AM n/a2 No
PM Yes
11 Bay Blvd & G St AM n/a2 No
PM Yes
21 Bay Blvd & J St AM Yes Yes
PM No Yes
26 Bay Blvd & L St AM Yes Yes
PM Yes Yes
31 Proj Dwy & H St AM No No
PM Yes Yes
Notes:

1. The signal warrant analysis was performed using the criteria outlined in Chapter 4C of the CA MUTCD 2014 for Warrant 3, Peak-Hour.

2. The intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS.

9.7 Queuing Analysis
A queuing analysis was performed at the Bay Boulev ard & G Street and Project Driveway & H Street intersections where a traffic signal is being proposed to determine the appropriate turn pocket lengths.

The queue length reported is the 95 th percentile queue length, which re presents the queue length where 95 percent of the queue lengths fall and only would be exceeded 5 percent of the time. Table 9-5 summarizes the results of the queuing analyses.

151

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
Table 9-5
Opening Year Plus Total Project Queuing Analysis Summary Intersection
Peak
Hour Movement
Storage Length
(ft)1
Queue Length (ft)2
Opening Year Plus Total Proj
11 Bay Blvd & G St
AM NB LT 280 96
PM 194
AM EB LT 150 53
PM 266
AM EB RT 150 23
PM 55
31 Proj Dwy & H St
AM EB LT 170 40
PM 29
AM SB LT 325 79
PM 604
AM SB RT 325 10
PM 26
Notes:

Values shown in bold indicate movements where the queue length exceeds the available storage length.

1. The storage length was based on the latest site plan prepared for the project and/or conceptual plans for the traffic signal.

2. The queue length shown represents the 95th percentile queue length for each respective movement and reported from Synchro 11.

As shown in the table, the 95
th percentile queue lengths would be co ntained within the respective turn pockets except for the following movement:

 Bay Boulevard & G Street: Eastbound left-turn lane
 Project Driveway & H Street: Southbound left-turn lane

The 95
th percentile queue length is estimated to surpa ss the allocated storage space by 116 feet along G Street and 279 feet along the Project Driveway. At the Bay Boulevard & G Street intersection, the queues extending past the turn pocket could be accommodated in the adjacent lane as queues are only 55 feet.

At the Project Driveway & H Street intersection, th e queues extending past the upstream intersection could be accommodated along the side streets. No qu eues are expected to extend back onto the public right-of-way.

Appendix L contains the queuing analyses worksheets.

152

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
10 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following list summarizes the key findings for the Project:

 The Project is a Specific Plan and consists of 3 planning areas:
o Planning Area A
o Planning Area B-1
o Planning Area B-2
 The LMA focuses on the project-level analysis of Planning Area B-1 (Project) and programmatic- level analysis of Planning Areas A and B-2 (Total Project).  The study area consists of 30 intersections a nd 5 project driveways with the addition of the Project. The study area is expanded to 30 intersections and 7 project driveways with the addition of the Total Project.
 The Project is estimated to generate 7,520 dail y trips with 903 AM peak-hour trips and 903 PM peak-hour trips. After applying the existing trip credits, the project is estimated to generate a net total of 5,115 daily trips with 446 AM peak-hour trips and 442 PM peak-hour trips.  The Project is estimated to generate a total of 8,501 daily trips with 1,065 AM peak-hour trips and 1,065 PM peak-hour trips with the PCE adjustments. After applying the existing trip credits, the project is estimated to generate a net total of 6,096 daily trips with 608 AM peak-hour trips and 584 PM peak-hour trips.
 The Total Project is estimated to generate a net total of 11,464 daily trips with 656 AM peak-hour trips and 882 PM peak-hour trips.
 The Total Project is estimated to generate a total of 12,858 daily trips with 888 AM peak-hour trips and 1,114 PM peak-hour trips with the PCE adjustments.  Six cumulative projects were identified and included in the Opening Year scenario.  The Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Tota l Project scenarios were evaluated to isolate the Project’s effects and does not rely on other capacity improvements by other projects.  All intersections and project driveways in the study area are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better under the Opening Year with Project scenario except at 10 locations.  All intersections and project driveways in the study area are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better under the Opening Year with Total Project scenario except at 11 locations.  With the addition of the Project, the fair shar e percentage would range between 1.0 percent and

38.5 percent. With the addition of the Total Project, the fair share percentage would range between 1.5 percent and 86.9 percent. To allow th e most flexibility for the Project, the Existing Plus Project and Existing Plus Total Project scenarios were used to determine the project improvements and responsibility.
 The Existing Plus Project scenario resulted in two intersections where improvements were required to achieve an acceptable LOS.
o I-5 SB Ramps & J Street: Signal retiming (100%)
o Bay Boulevard & L Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share)  The Existing Plus Total Project scenario resulted in five intersections where improvements were required to achieve an acceptable LOS.
o Bay Boulevard & H Street: Signal retiming (100%)
153

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
o Bay Boulevard & J Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o I-5 SB Ramps & J Street: Signal retiming (100%)
o Bay Boulevard & L Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o Project Driveway & H Street: Signalize intersection (100%)  Three additional scenarios were evaluated, whic h were a percentage of the Total Project to establish trip generation budgets for various levels of development for Planning Areas A and B-2.  The Scenario 1 Net Total Project is estimated to ge nerate a net total of 11,844 daily trips with 846 AM peak-hour trips and 1,035 PM peak-hour trips.
 The Scenario 2 Net Total Project is estimated to generate a net total of 10,829 daily trips with 805 AM peak-hour trips and 955 PM peak-hour trips.
 The Scenario 3 Net Total Project is estimated to generate a net total of 9,815 daily trips with 762 AM peak-hour trips and 876 PM peak-hour trips.
 The Existing Plus Scenario 1 Total Project sc enario resulted in fi ve intersections where improvements were required to achieve an acceptable LOS. o Bay Boulevard & H Street: Signal retiming (100%)
o Bay Boulevard & J Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o I-5 SB Ramps & J Street: Signal retiming (Fair Share) o Bay Boulevard & L Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o Project Driveway & H Street: Signalize intersection (100%)  The Existing Plus Scenario 2 Total Project scenario resulted in five intersections where improvements were required to achieve an acceptable LOS. o Bay Boulevard & H Street: Signal retiming (100%)
o Bay Boulevard & J Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o I-5 SB Ramps & J Street: Signal retiming (Fair Share) o Bay Boulevard & L Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o Project Driveway & H Street: Signalize intersection (100%)  The Existing Plus Scenario 3 Total Project scenario resulted in four intersections where improvements were required to achieve an acceptable LOS. o Bay Boulevard & J Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o I-5 SB Ramps & J Street: Signal retiming (Fair Share) o Bay Boulevard & L Street: Signalize intersection (Fair Share) o Project Driveway & H Street: Signalize intersection (100%)  The Bay Boulevard intersections at F Street, G Street, J Street, and L Street and the Project Driveway & H Street intersection all met the peak-hour signal warrant analysis under the Opening Year 2026 With Project and Total Project scenarios.  The 95
th percentile queue lengths at the two project driveways off G Street and H Street where a traffic signal is being proposed were all contai ned in the respective turn pockets and/or are accommodated in the adjacent lanes/internal side streets.  The improvements identified in this LMA are recommendations and the final improvement plan and project funding responsibility will be defi ned and documented in a separate Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan Transportation Conditions of Approval memo.

154

Rohr/Wohl Specific Plan
Local Mobility Analysis
This LMA has been prepared in accordance with the City’s TSG. The proposed Project will not result in any deficient facilities in the study area after the implementation of various improvements shown above and no additional improvements are required or recommended of the proposed Project. 155

Appendix A
Project Information Form (PIF)

APPENDIX A
Project Information Form for Transportation Studies

Page 1 of 3 ends

Chula Vista City CouncilNovember 18, 2025

Chula Vista City Council
November 18, 2025