Site Assessment (LESA) Model that was utilized to determine the proposed Project’s potential impact on agricultural resources. As noted, the proposed Project has a final LESA score of 50.50, which is a significant impact only if the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment sub scores are each greater than or equal to 20 points. The proposed Project has a sub score of 32.50 for the Land Evaluation (LE) and a sub score of 18.0 for the Site Assessment (SA), which means the conversion of the land on the Project site is not considered significant according to the California Department of Conservation’s established thresholds.
Response L-5-9a: This comment states that “The EIR acknowledges the significant increase in average daily trips generated by the Project and, correctly, concludes the Project will have a 3554
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-94 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North significant vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact. (See Draft EIR, pp. 3.13-18 through
3.13-23.) The air quality analysis, however, downplays the significance of mobile source pollution generated by the Project and completely fails to analyze the potential for project generated traffic to have significant toxic air contaminant (TAC) impacts from ultrafine particles (UFPs) emitted by vehicle emissions, braking, and tire wear.” • Neither the DEIR nor the Air Quality Analysis downplay the significance of mobile source emissions that would be generated because of the Project. Rather, the DEIR explains that the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) was used to estimate emissions for the proposed Project. Page 3.3-25 describes that the Project buildout was assumed to be completed in 2028 and that “This may prove to be a conservative estimate because criteria pollutant emission rates are reduced over time (due to state and federal mandates) and would be expected to be even lower than reported in this analysis, should the Project buildout be completed after 2028.” Pages 3.3-27 through 3.3-28 presents the thresholds of significance by which the Project emissions are compared against to determine the level of significance. The emissions estimates, which were based on conservative assumptions, were found to not exceed any of the SJVACPD operational thresholds of significance.
The Project would also not result in significant environmental effects associated with the release of ultrafine particles (UFPs) associated with vehicle emissions, braking, and tire wear.
UFPs (defined as fine particles of less than 0.1 microns in size, or PM0.1) are a subset of PM, which is regulated under PM10 and PM2.5 rules, however, there are no adopted rules or regulations for PM0.1 by the U.S. EPA or California air districts.
Moreover, attainment status related to UFPs is not monitored by the U.S. EPA or California air districts, and the SJVAPCD does not provide any guidance for assessment, thresholds, or mitigation associated with UFPs.
Different sources of PM generate differing levels of UFPs. Precisely estimating PM0.1 can be difficult, given that UFPs are not incorporated into the modeling software recommended by the CARB and the California air districts (i.e.
CalEEMod). UFPs are primarily generated by motor vehicle emissions (especially from diesel engines), braking, and tire wear. Specifically, UFPs are comprised mostly of metals that are known constituents of brake pads and drums, as well as additives in motor oil. Generally, all engines can create UFPs, but especially diesel 3555
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-95 engines, and any vehicle's braking system; traffic, particularly start-and-stop, generates UFPs.2
UFPs are a type of particulate matter, and like other particulate matters, they have the potential to generate chronic risks associated with cardiovascular disease, potential long-term loss of long-function, and cancer. According to a recent study prepared for the European Geosciences Union, UFPs vary widely as a proportion of PM overall, depending on location; specifically, the PM0.1 to PM2.5 ratio analyzed in approximately 39 cities in the United States varied from approximately 1% to 16%.3 These factors vary so widely because the sources of PM0.1 vary substantially from city to city. For example, cities that are located close to substantial sources of natural gas combustion have higher PM0.1 to PM2.5 ratios, since almost all the PM emitted by natural gas combustion is in the PM0.1 size fraction, whereas this is only true for less than half of the PM emitted by gasoline and diesel fuel combustion. Taken together, these facts support the potential importance of natural gas combustion for ambient PM0.1 concentrations. The city analyzed in the study with the greatest similarity to the City of Clovis (i.e. where the Project is located) was the City of Bakersfield, given its similarity in location within the Central Valley region. The ratio of PM0.1 to PM2.5 for Bakersfield was found to be approximately 11%. Absent precise data specific to the City of Clovis, this data is presumed to be the best available data for use in developing a reasonable estimate of PM0.1 levels for the proposed Project. Given the Project’s estimated 1.2 tons per year of PM2.5 (see Table 3.3-6 on page 3.3-27), the total PM0.1 generated by the Project is estimated to be approximately 0.132 tons per year (263 lbs/year). This is equivalent to 0.72 lbs/day of PM0.1. While there is not specifically a quantitative threshold of significance established by the SJVAPCD for PM0.1, the quantity estimated (0.72 lbs/day) is considered small relative to thresholds that the SJVAPCD has established for other particulate matter (i.e. 82 lbs/day). From an incremental health perspective, this level of UFPs generated by the Project would not result in any significant environmental effect. 2 Aerosol Science and Technology. 2011. Thomas A. Cahill, David E. Barnes, Nicholas J. Spada, Jonathan A. Lawton, and Thomas M. Cahill. Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the California Central Valley 1:
2003-2007. July 13, 2011.
3 Venecek, M. A., Yu, X., and Kleeman, M. J.: Predicted ultrafine particulate matter source contribution across the continental United States during summertime air pollution events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9399–9412, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9399-2019, 2019.
3556
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-96 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response L-5-9b: This comment states that “The EIR also fails to analyze cumulative TAC emissions from project traffic combined with traffic levels presumed from buildout under the General Plan.”
• The proposed Project does not include any industrial or commercial uses that would present a significant source of diesel exhaust particulate matter (diesel PM), benzene, and 1,3-butadiene, all of which are emitted by motor vehicles.
These mobile source air toxics are largely associated with freeways and high traffic roads which are not part of the proposed Project. The DEIR discusses the fact that a 2007 U.S. EPA rule requires controls that has, and will continue, to dramatically decreases Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) emissions through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines. The DEIR notes that an FHWA analysis using EPA’s MOBILE6.2 model, even if vehicle activity (VMT) increases by 145 percent, a combined reduction of 72 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT is projected from 1999 to 2050. The DEIR also notes that California maintains stricter standards for clean fuels and emissions compared to the national standards. Therefore, the evidence shows MSAT trends in California will decrease consistent with or more than the U.S. EPA's national projections. These facts are on a cumulative basis extending out to an estimated year 2050-time horizon. As a result, the Project would not result in any cumulatively considerable TAC emissions.
Response L-5-9c: This comment states that “The EIR acknowledges the Supreme Court’s decision in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502 (Friant Ranch), which requires EIRs to analyze and disclose the human health effects of a project’s air quality emissions or explain why doing so is infeasible. (Id. at pp. 519-520.) The EIR claims to perform the required analysis, albeit in “qualitative” fashion. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.3-25 through 3.3-
26.) Like the EIR in Friant Ranch, however, the Project’s EIR “generally outlines some of the unhealthy symptoms associated with exposure to various pollutants” but “does not give any sense of the nature and magnitude of the ‘health and safety problems caused by the physical changes’ resulting from the Project.” (Friant Ranch, at p. 522; see Draft EIR, pp. 3.3-28 through 3.3-30.) Instead, the EIR analyzes the Project’s contribution to air pollution (Ozone and particulate matter (PM), specifically) and while the cumulative levels of those pollutants “would affect people[,]” the Project’s emissions would be less than the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) thresholds of significance. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.3-29 through 3.3-30.) The EIR’s conclusory statement that pollution “would affect people” does not come close to the analysis required by Friant Ranch. The EIR must be revised to either analyze whether 3557
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-97 the Project’s air quality emissions would have significant human health effects or explain why doing so is infeasible.”
• The lead agency (City of Clovis) evaluated the Project to determine the appropriate approach and methodology to analyzing the health effects from the air quality emissions. Page 3.3-25 notes that the lead agency determined that, given the nature and size of the Project, a qualitative approach to correlating the expected air quality emissions of Projects to the likely health consequences of the increased emissions is appropriate. This statement does not, however, mean the DEIR did not include any quantitative analysis of air emissions, but rather, it is indicative of a two-step process to analyzing health effects from air emissions.
The first step in the analysis determines the path warranted in the second step.
If the air emissions exceed the human protective thresholds established by the SJVAPCD for the purpose of protecting human health, then there is a “potential” for a significant impact and more quantitative modeling is warranted to adequately explain the nature and magnitude of the “significant” health effects.
However, if the human protective thresholds are not exceeded, then there is not a potential for a significant impact and more detailed quantitative modeling is not warranted as a second step. Under this scenario, the nature and magnitude of the impact is “less than significant” and a qualitative explanation of the health effects of the less then significant impact is all that is warranted.
Central to the determination of approach and methodology described above is understanding of the Friant Ranch Decision and the SJVAPCD guidance, including their thresholds of significance. First, the City evaluated the pollution levels associated with the Project through quantitative modeling, and compared the quantitative outputs from the model to the quantitative thresholds of significance that are established by the SJVAPCD (see Table 3.3-6 on page 3.3-27).
The SJVAPCD thresholds are established to be protective of human health, and the quantitative modeling for the Project shows that the emission levels are below the human protective thresholds established by the SJVAPCD. This is an important factor when considering the California Supreme Court ruling in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, known as the Friant Ranch Decision.
The EIR at issue in that case concluded that criteria air pollutants would “exceed” the SJVAPCD-issued human protective thresholds of significance and impacts would be “significant and unavoidable.” The Court found the EIR’s conclusion to be insufficient because the air quality analysis did not adequately explain the nature and magnitude of the “significant and unavoidable” health effects from 3558
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-98 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North long-term emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors that exceeded district thresholds.
Here, in contrast, the DEIR concluded that the Project’s criteria air pollutant emissions would be below the SJVAPCD thresholds, which are specifically set to be protective of human health. Emissions below the SJVAPCD’s health-protective thresholds indicate that there would not be significant health effects from the Project’s air emissions. Under this conclusion, there is not a warrant for more quantitative analysis than was already performed in the first step of quantitative modeling because additional analysis will still lead to the conclusion that the Project emissions are below the human health protective measures. As a result, the Project was not required to proceed to the second step of the analysis or perform a full Health Risk Assessment.
Further, the SJVAPCD is the agency responsible for evaluating projects and regulating air emissions in the region. In their regulatory capacity, the SJVAPCD defines guidelines for an analysis and establishes thresholds of significance. The SJVAPCD received the Draft EIR and did not raise any concerns that were asserted by the commenter. In fact, on December 6, 2023 the SJVAPCD issued a letter to the City of Clovis approving the Air Impact Assessment for the proposed Project.
Response L-5-9d: This comment states that “Additionally, the EIR only considers the health effects of the Project’s contribution to ozone and PM (PM10 and PM2.5, specifically). (See Draft EIR, pp. 3.3-28 through 3.3-30.) The EIR does not consider potential impacts from the Project generated traffic emissions of UFPs (including emissions from tailpipe emissions, braking, and tire wear), and does not analyze the potential human health effects of Project UFP emissions. UFPs are another air quality impact not discussed in the EIR. UFPs, particles with diameters less than 0.1 micrometers, are comprised mostly of metals that are known constituents of brake pads and drums, as well as additives in motor oil. (Exhibit 2, Cahill, Ch. 8, p. 80.) Generally, all engines can create UFPs, but especially diesel engines, and any vehicle's braking system. (Exhibit 3, Cahill, Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the California Central Valley 1: 2003-2007, p. 1130.) Traffic, particularly start-and-stop, generates UFPs. (See Exhibit 3, Cahill, Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the California Central Valley 1: 2003- 2007, p. 1131.) Recent research suggests that UFPs pose considerable health risks, such as increased risk of cardio-vascular disease and ischemic heart disease death rates, and loss of lung function. (Exhibit 4, Cahill, Artificial ultra-fine aerosol tracers for highway transect studies, pp. 31-32; see also Exhibit 5, Cahill, Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the 3559
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-99 California Central Valley 2: 1974-1991; Exhibit 3, Cahill, Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the California Central Valley 1: 2003-2007.) "The strongest correlations to [ischemic heart disease] mortality were found in very fine ... to ultrafine metals, with most tied to vehicular sources." (Exhibit 3, Cahill, Very Fine and Ultrafine Metals and Ischemic Heart Disease in the California Central Valley 1:
2003 - 2007, p. 1133.) Prenatal proximity to freeways and exposure to UFPs may be causally linked to increased autism rates in children. (Exhibit 6, Volk, Residential Proximity to Freeways and Autism in the CHARGE Study, p. 875.) Unlike diesel exhaust or other larger TAC emissions, UFPs are more persistent and do not dissipate easily over distances. (Exhibit 7, Cahill, Transition metals in coarse, fine, very fine and ultrafine particles from an interstate highway transect near Detroit, pp. 340-341.) Moreover, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has acknowledged that the transition to zero emissions vehicles (ZEVs) will not eliminate all traffic emissions. (Exhibit 8, CARB Technical Advisory, p. 17 [“Non-tailpipe particulate matter emissions—like road dust, tire wear, and brake wear” are roughly equivalent in ZEVs and internal combustion engine vehicles, due to the higher weight of ZEVs].)…The EIR does not ever mention UFPs as a potentially significant air quality impact and therefore fails as an informational document. In addition to acknowledging these TAC emissions that will be exacerbated by the Project, the recirculated EIR will need to measure those emissions and correlate those emission levels to identified health risks, if feasible. If not feasible, the recirculated EIR will need to explain why so. As discussed above, the EIR correctly acknowledges the relevance of Friant Ranch, which explains the “EIR must provide an adequate analysis to inform the public how its bare numbers translate to create potential adverse impacts or it must adequately explain what the agency does know and why, given existing scientific constraints, it cannot translate potential health impacts further.” Here, the EIR has not even attempted to inform the public of the “bare numbers” with respect to mobile UFP emissions, let alone translate those numbers into quantifiable adverse impacts. The failure to do so is inexcusable given that recent scientific studies demonstrate that it is feasible to correlate TACs and UFP emissions levels to resulting human health risks. The EIR must make a good-faith effort to consider and analyze whether mobile source emissions (including UFPs) created by the Project would pose a potential health risk to future Project occupants.” • The commenter is referred to Response L-5-9a.
Response L-5-10: This comment states that “Lastly, the EIR’s analysis of the Project’s consistency with the Air Quality element of the City’s General Plan is based on the false promise of compliance with mitigation measures that do not exist. The Land Use, Population, and 3560
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-100 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Housing chapter of the EIR analyzes the Project’s consistency with various goals and policies of the City’s General Plan. (See, generally, Draft EIR, ch. 3.10.) With respect to Air Quality, the EIR claims that the Project is “consistent” with Air-Policy 1.1 in the Air Quality element of the City’s General Plan, which directs the City to “[r]educe greenhouse gas and other local pollutant emissions through mixed use and transitoriented development and well- designed transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems.” (Draft EIR, p. 3.10-19.) As stated above, the EIR finds the Project “consistent” with this policy because the Project would, allegedly, reduce VMT through pedestrian and bicycle systems and as required by Mitigation Measure 3.13-1 in Section 3.13 of the Draft EIR, the applicant would be required to implement measures, which are identified in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) Draft Handbook for Analyzing GHG Emission Reductions, assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (GHG Handbook). Many of the strategies listed in this mitigation measure pertain to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems. (Draft EIR, p. 3.10-19.)…Contrary to the discussion of consistency with Air-Policy 1.1, however, there is no Mitigation Measure 3.13-1. (Cf. Draft EIR, ch. 3.13 [Transportation and Circulation].) Accordingly, because there are no measures that “the applicant would be required to implement” regarding “transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems” the EIR’s conclusion that the Project is consistent with Air-Policy 1.1 is unsupported. The EIR must be revised to analyze the Project’s consistency with the Air Quality element of the General Plan without relying on phantom mitigation measures. • The commenter notes a clerical error in Section 3.10’s policy consistency analysis; specifically, and that Mitigation Measure 3.13-1 does not exist in the DEIR, and that the presence of Mitigation Measure 3.13-1 is relied upon to show consistency with Air-Policy 1.1. This comment warrants text revisions to correct and clarify the conclusions in the DEIR. The edits are made to Section 3.10 of the DEIR starting on page 3.10-19. This text revision is intended to clarify that the mitigating features of the Project are presented in the text as Project Design Features, and not as “Mitigation Measure 3.13-1.” It is acknowledged that Mitigation Measure 3.13-1 does not exist in the Draft EIR. Additional text was also added to amplify the discussion regarding relevant CAPCOA measures incorporated into the Project to mitigate, or reduce, VMT. Also added, is a discussion of the EV measures that also are incorporated into the Project to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other local pollutant emissions.
Response L-5-11a: This comment states that “The EIR includes a cursory analysis of potential energy impacts and assumes that the Project’s consistency with state and local laws, including building codes, supports determining that the Project’s energy impacts 3561
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-101 would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.7-27 through 3.7-30.) For example, the EIR claim the Project “would be responsible for conserving energy, to the extent feasible, and relies heavily on reducing per capital energy consumption to achieve this goal, including through statewide and local measures.” (Id. at p. 3.7-29.) The final EIR merely repeats this unsupported conclusion. (Final EIR, p. 2.0-27.) The EIR, however, contains no description of any specific measures the project would implement, and no commitment by the Project to do anything specific to conserve energy. (See id.) Instead, the EIR relies on regulated entities complying with laws and regulations to conclude that the Project would not have a significant energy impact. (Id.) Whether or not Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) complies with the law in general, however, says nothing about this Project’s potential energy impacts. In other words, there is no substantial evidence connecting PG&E’s compliance with the Statewide Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) with the efficiency and energy conservation efforts of the Project. (See Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 225.) The EIR must be revised to actually analyze the Project’s consumption and conservation of energy to determine whether there will be a potentially significant impact or not.”
• The commenter contends that there is no description of any specific measures the Project would implement, and no commitment by the Project to do anything specific to conserve energy. What is under consideration in the EIR for the CEQA analysis threshold, is not whether the Project includes specific measures to conserve energy, but rather “would the project result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources.” There is no component of the Project that would have inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy sources. The Project is a typical residential project, which is not a type of project that is characterized as an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary user of energy resources.
Furthermore, and as a matter of law, the State legislature has established standards and regulations to ensure that residential uses incorporate specific measures to prevent inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy. A residential project that does not comply with these standards would be deemed inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources.
The DEIR discusses elements of the Project that incorporate renewable energy resources into the design and construction of the project. While in years past, incorporating solar panels on residential buildings was often considered a mitigation measure that would be introduced into an EIR to ensure renewable energy sources are part of a project, today, such solar panels on residential buildings are mandated by CALGreen (Part 11 of Title 24). As such, the proposed 3562
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-102 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Project will install solar panels on all new residential buildings. In other words, the installation of solar panels on all residential buildings is evidence that it will incorporate renewable energy sources into the proposed Project. Other energy saving elements would include: the use of water saving shower heads, faucets, and toilets, installation of energy efficient appliances, and other standards outlined in the State Title 24 building energy efficiency standards (“part 6”). These are specific measures that would be implemented by the proposed Project by virtue of the legal requirement to do so (i.e. the State law). The fact that that the Project will install solar panels, and other energy saving elements of a residential home, in compliance with the requirements of the CALGreen mandates is evidence that the Project does not conflict with standards that are in place to prevent inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy. The Project would comply with these standards as a condition of project approval.
In addition to the building construction standards mentioned above that will specifically require each home to install solar panels to generate solar energy at each home, the Project also will utilize an energy provider (PG&E) that has shifted their mix of energy portfolio toward a higher mix of renewable energy resources.
The California Energy Commission (CEC) has established an RPS target mix of renewable energy within PG&Es portfolio dating back to 2011 and extending through 2030. The CEC performs a periodic verification to ensure that PG&E is achieving the target established. So far, PG&E has met the RPS verification by the CEC in 2011-2013 4, 2014-2016
5 , and 2017-20206. The target established for the
most recent verification was a 33 percent mix of renewables, which was surpassed by PG&E with a 35 percent mix. PG&E provided a press release in 20217 indicating that they are on track to meet the states RPS targets, which will include a 60 percent mix of renewable energy by the end of 2030. This shift toward renewable energy resources is mandated by the State as part of the Renewable 4 California Energy Commission, Renewables Portfolio Standard 2011-2013 Retail Sellers Procurement VerificationCommission Final Report 5 California Energy Commission, Renewables Portfolio Standard 2014-2016 Retail Sellers Procurement Verification - Commission Final Report
6 California Energy Commission, Renewables Portfolio Standard 2017-202 Retail Sellers Procurement Verification - Commission Final Report
7 PG&E Corporation - PG&E Surpasses California’s 2020 Renewable Energy Goal; Electricity Delivered to Customers is More than 88% Greenhouse Gas-Free and Among the Cleanest in the Nation (pgecorp.com) 3563
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-103 Portfolio Standard (RPS)8 and PG&E has shown a history of achieving the targets.
While each home will generate solar energy from the solar panels on each home, any excess energy would be from a PG&E’s high mix of renewable energy which shows that the Project is placing a high reliance on renewable energy. The Project does not conflict with the RPS, or any directive toward the use or generation of renewable energy. Rather, the Project generates its own renewable energy, and will also rely on a utility provider to provide verified renewable energy. The Project does not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources.
Other Statewide measures are also applicable, including those intended to improve the energy efficiency of the statewide passenger and heavy-duty truck vehicle fleet (e.g., the Pavley Bill and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard). These measures would improve vehicle fuel economies, thereby conserving gasoline and diesel fuel. These energy savings would continue to accrue over time and are designed to reduce energy consumption.
What is at question in the DEIR impact analysis, is not whether the Project will require the use of energy, but rather, will the project’s energy use be “inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary.” The proposed Project relies on renewable energy to supply the energy demand, both from onsite capture (solar panels) and from purchase of energy with a high mix of renewables (PG&E renewable portfolio). As a result, no component of the Project’s energy use would be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary.
Response L-5-11b: This comment states that “Moreover, the EIR’s cursory energy analysis fails to consider renewable energy use in determining whether the Project could have a significant energy impact. CEQA requires the “EIR’s analysis of a project's impacts on energy resources must include a discussion of whether the project could increase its reliance on renewable energy sources to meet its energy demand as part of determining whether the project's energy impacts are significant.” (League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain etc. v. County of Placer (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 63, 164 (League to Save Lake Tahoe etc.).) As discussed above, the EIR concludes that the Project’s energy impacts would be less than significant based solely on regulated entities (i.e., PG&E) complying with the law and does not discuss renewable energy options for the Project itself. “Because the EIR did not address whether any renewable energy 8 California Energy Commission, Renewables Portfolio Standard Eligibility Guidebook, Ninth Edition, adopted at the April 27, 2017, Business Meeting
3564
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-104 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North features could be incorporated into the project as part of determining whether the project's impacts on energy resources were significant, it did not comply with CEQA’s procedural requirements, a prejudicial error.” (League to Save Lake Tahoe etc., at p. 168.) The EIR must be revised to analyze renewable energy use as a component of the Project’s potential energy impacts and recirculated to allow the public to comment on this important issue.”
• The commenter states the DEIR does not discuss renewable energy options for the Project itself. The DEIR, however, does discuss the fact that the Project will fully rely on a combination of solar panels (a form of renewable energy) on the residential roofs of all new buildings in compliance with State law. It also discusses the reliance on an energy provider (PG&E) to bridge any additional energy needs, and that PG&E specifically has established a mix of energy resources, which includes renewables to meet the Statewide Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). The DEIR also notes that PG&E is expected to achieve at least a 40% mix of renewable energy resources by 2030. These specific design elements are discussed in the Draft EIR, not as a mitigation, but being incorporated into the Project as a matter of law. Because the Draft EIR clearly identifies that the Project will increase its reliance on renewable energy sources to meet is energy demand through solar panels and the use of PG&E as its energy provider, the document adequately addresses the Project’s potential to increase reliance on renewable energy sources.
Response L-5-12a: This comment states that “The regulatory setting in the EIR’s noise analysis describes noise standards in the City’s General Plan and ordinances. (Draft EIR, p. 3.11-7.) The EIR, however, does not discuss the County’s General Plan policies and ordinances governing noise. (Id. but see Draft EIR p. 3.8-1 [analyzing hazards and hazardous materials impacts based, in part, on information from the Fresno County General Plan and Fresno County Zoning Ordinance].) Because the existing sensitive receptors surrounding the Project site are and would remain part of unincorporated Fresno County, the EIR should analyze noise impacts based on the County’s noise policies and ordinances as well. (See United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 1074, 1096 (UNLA) [“No such deference is warranted, however, with respect to the City’s determination of which policies apply to the Project. The principle that the City is uniquely positioned to weigh the priority of competing policies does not extend to the question of which policies are to be placed on the scales”].)4 • The commenter correctly indicates that the DEIR presents an analysis based on the City of Clovis noise standards as thresholds. These standards are provided on 3565
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-105 page 3.11-9 of the DEIR. These standards are appropriate for suburban areas that interface with agricultural uses, such as the project site, as there are numerous such properties within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. Moreover, when the County’s noise standards are applied, the result is likewise that there would not be a significant impact. This is consistent with the conclusion in the DEIR when the City’s standards are applied. For instance, County Policy HS-H.7 indicates where existing noise levels are between 60 and 65 dB Ldn at outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a 3 dB Ldn increase in noise levels will be considered significant. Table 3.11-9 shows the existing plus project scenario to result in a noise level change that ranges from 0.0 dB to 1.3 dB at a 50’ distance from centerline on roadways that would remain in the County. Following the County’s criteria established in Policy HS-H.7, the noise change resulting with the Project would be below the County standard of 3 dB. There is only one location that would exceed that standard (Sunnyside Avenue – Project Driveway 1 to Shepherd Avenue) but that location would be within the City of Clovis. However, the DEIR includes a mitigation measure that reduces noise levels in that location to an acceptable level. As a result of the application of the mitigation measure there would be no areas that would exceed the noise standards resulting in a less than significant impact. Regardless, the City has determined that its existing thresholds of significance for traffic noise are appropriate for City projects, regardless of whether an adjacent jurisdiction has different noise thresholds.
Regarding construction noise, it is also notable that the Fresno County Noise Control Ordinance (Section 8.40.060) establishes activities that are exempted from the provisions of the County’s Noise Control Ordinance. This specifically includes noise sources associated with construction, provided such activities do not take place before 6:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. on any day except Saturday or Sunday, or before 7:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday. Here, the County has established a timing threshold like the City’s noise ordinance (Section
5.27.604), however, the City’s standard is stricter than the County’s. Regardless, the City has determined that its existing thresholds of significance for noise are appropriate for City projects, regardless of whether an adjacent jurisdiction has different noise thresholds.
Response L-5-12b: This comment states that “The EIR acknowledges that Project generated traffic on Sunnyside Avenue between Shepard Avenue and “Project Intersection 1” will have a significant impact on the environment. (Draft EIR, p. 3.11-16.) The EIR, however, fails to measure, model, or analyze the potential noise impacts of Project generated traffic on Sunnyside Avenue north of “Project Intersection 1.” (Cf. id.)” 3566
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-106 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North • The Draft EIR indicates that the existing noise level on Sunnyside Avenue from Shepherd Avenue to Project Intersection 1 is 54.4dBA at 50’ from the centerline of the roadway, and would increase to 60.5 dBA with project traffic which is below the City’s standards and thresholds established for the analysis. Under the cumulative year, the noise level would reach 69.9 dBA CNEL and would require a 6’ soundwall placed at 47 feet from the centerline to reduce noise levels down to of 63.7 dBA CNEL, which is required under Mitigation Measure 3.11-2. This is below the 65 dBA CNEL noise standards with the 6’ soundwall.
The Project would not result in any potentially significant impacts for the portions of Sunnyside south of Shepherd Avenue. The project peak traffic volumes along Sunnyside under the existing conditions is 58 trips. These are trips that originate from the north of the Development Area, and specifically north of the Intersection 1 (i.e. Lexington, Perrin, etc.). Almost all trips generated by the Project are anticipated to be southbound on Sunnyside toward Shepherd Avenue from the Intersections on Sunnyside. This means any Project-related noise increases on Sunnyside would be concentrated in the zone between Shepherd Avenue and Intersection 1, as the new traffic is generated from the Development Area and not the area to the north. The traffic noise levels north of the intersection 1 would remain largely the same as the existing condition because the traffic levels are not anticipated to change.
Response L-5-12c: This comment states that “Moreover, nowhere in the EIR is there any Project entryway identified as “Project Intersection 1.” (See, e.g., Draft EIR, ch. 11 [Noise], ch
3.13 [Transportation].) The Transportation analysis identifies Study Intersection 23 as “Sunnyside Avenue/Project Driveway 1.” (Draft EIR, Appendix I, Figure 4-2.) Assuming “Project Intersection 1” and “Project Driveway 1” are the same thing, then the EIR also fails to analyze the noise impacts of project generated traffic to off-site receptors along Lexington Avenue that will abut the public street identified as “Project Driveway 1” in the Transportation analysis.”
• The terminology used by the noise engineer in their reporting for the access point into the Development Area was “Intersection,” whereas the traffic engineer used the term “driveway” to describe the same access points. These terms describe the same points of access. Nevertheless, edits are made to DEIR pages 3.11-16 through 3.11-17 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR to change the term “Intersection” to “Driveway” to clarify for the commenter. This text is reflected in the Errata and the change does not affect the analysis. As described under Response L-5-12b, the project peak traffic volumes along Sunnyside under the existing conditions is 58 trips. These are trips that originate from the north of the Development Area, 3567
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-107 and specifically north of the Intersection 1 (i.e. Lexington, Perrin, etc.). Almost all trips generated by the Project are anticipated to be southbound on Sunnyside toward Shepherd Avenue from the Intersections on Sunnyside. The implication of this fact is that the noise increases on Sunnyside are concentrated in the zone between Shepherd Avenue and Driveway 1 because the new traffic is generated from the Development Area and not the area to the north. The traffic noise levels north of Driveway 1 will remain largely the same as the existing condition because the traffic levels are not anticipated to change. This fact is based on the Nondevelopment Area not having any new development, and the area to the north of the Development Area not having any significant destinations from residents of the Development Area.
Response L-5-12d: This comment states that “Moreover, the Noise Mitigation Measures in the EIR only address noise impacts to residences within the Project site and do nothing for existing off-site receptors. (See Draft EIR, p. 3.11-19 [Mitigation Measures 3.11-1 and 3.11-2].) Moreover, the final EIR does not remedy this deficiency. (Final EIR, p. 2.0-20.) The EIR must be revised and recirculated to analyze and mitigate noise impacts to existing offsite receptors from project generated traffic along “Project Driveway 1” and/or “Project Intersection 1.”
• The Project would not result in any potentially significant impacts for the portions of Sunnyside south of Shepherd Avenue. As described under Response L-5-12b, the project peak traffic volumes along Sunnyside under the existing conditions is 58 trips. These are trips that originate from the north of the Development Area, and specifically north of the Driveway (i.e. Intersection) 1 (i.e. Lexington, Perrin, etc.). Almost all trips generated by the Project are anticipated to be southbound on Sunnyside toward Shepherd Avenue from the Intersections on Sunnyside. This means any Project-related noise increases on Sunnyside would be concentrated in the zone between Shepherd Avenue and Driveway (i.e. Intersection) 1, as the new traffic is generated from the Development Area and not the area to the north. The traffic noise levels north of the Driveway (i.e. Intersection) 1 will remain largely the same as the existing condition because the traffic levels are not anticipated to change in that direction. Edits are made to DEIR pages 3.11-19 in Section 3.11 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR. This text is reflected in the Errata and the change does not affect the analysis.
Response L-5-12e: This comment states that “The EIR admits that Project construction will generate noise levels exceeding the standards in the City’s General Plan for residential land use (see Draft EIR, 3.11-9 [Table 3.11-6: Maximum Exterior Noise Standards, “allowable exterior noise level (15-Minute Leq)” 55 dba from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.]), and that the 3568
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-108 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North existing homes in the non-development areas will be subject to construction noise levels that are more than double the baseline measured in the technical noise analysis. (Draft EIR, p. 3.11-19 [“This would be a 13 dB Leq daytime increase in the ambient noise level at the residents along Perrin Rd., Purdue Ave., and East Lexington Ave”]; see Draft EIR, p. 3.11-4 [“A 10-db change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and can cause an adverse response”].) Rather than proposing and analyzing feasible means of reducing these significant noise impacts, the EIR points to a handful of largely meaningless “strategies” including a prohibition on equipment idling and the use of already installed vehicle mufflers, and concludes, without any analysis, that these measures will reduce noise to less than significant levels. (Draft EIR, p. 3.11-20 [Mitigation Measure 3.11-4.)5 The EIR, however, contains no explanation, analysis, or substantial evidence to support this conclusion. (Cf. id.) The EIR must be revised to analyze whether this mitigation would actually reduce noise levels below the City’s threshold or include additional feasible measures to do so. For example, temporary noise barriers, combined with regular monitoring and reporting of construction noise levels are a few of the many feasible noise mitigation measures available for the City’s consideration. (See Exhibit 9.)” • An analysis of construction noise associated with the Project is presented on page
3.11-19 through 3.11-20. As mentioned by the commenter, the DEIR indicates that unmitigated noise levels at 550 feet have the potential to reach 60 dBA Leq and 92 dBA Lmax at the nearest sensitive receptors during grading. Noise levels for the other construction phases would be lower, approximately from 46 to 59 dBA Leq and 86 to 93 dBA Lmax. This would be a 13 dB Leq daytime increase in the ambient noise level at the residents along Perrin Rd., Purdue Ave., and East Lexington Ave. The modeling assumes construction equipment as close as 25 feet from the adjacent residences and an average of 550 feet away from the adjacent residences.
The DEIR also notes that construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction activities are performed outside the allowable times as described in the City of Clovis Municipal Code Section
5.27.604. In effect, this limits construction to the less sensitive daytime hours.
The reasoning for establishing the allowable times as a threshold of significance for construction noise is because the sensitivity of noise to a resident is greater during the nighttime hours when people are trying to rest, as opposed to the day time hours when more noise is anticipated because activity levels are greater. The City established permissible hours for construction in their Municipal Code, and these are appropriate for use as a threshold of significance. 3569
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-109 The DEIR presents Mitigation Measure 3.11-3, presented on page 3.11-20 of the DEIR. This measure embodies a preexisting legal requirement from City of Clovis Municipal Code Section 5.27.604 that ensures that construction activities are performed within specific hours, and ensures that construction noise does not exceed the timing threshold established. The timing threshold is intended to concentrate construction noise to the least noise sensitive time, which has been established by the City as during normal daytime hours. To the contrary, the timing threshold places a much higher weighted value, which is effectively a prohibition by the City of noise generating activities during nighttime hours.
Simply put, the City has established that nighttime noise is significant, and daytime noise is insignificant. The timing threshold described is used in a qualitative analysis that considers the threshold relative to the expected time for construction activities. A project that would require nighttime construction would have a potentially significant impact, whereas a project constructed during daytime hours would have a less than significant impact. DEIR presents Mitigation Measure 3.11-3 to embody the threshold that the City finds effective as ensuring construction noise is not a significant impact.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4, also presented on page 3.11-20 of the DEIR, provides specific requirements for attenuating noise during construction. These measures are supplemental to the requirement provided under Mitigation Measure 3.11-3, and are intended to further minimize the impact of construction noise during the time periods that are already determined to be the least noise sensitive time periods. The first bullet calls for all construction equipment to be equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. Such devices are commonly known as mufflers, which are effective at reducing noise associated with an exhaust system by up to 5 decibels. For clarification, the term “devices” is revised to “mufflers” in the Errata. The second bullet calls for turning off equipment when not in use.
Equipment on construction sites is often left idling when not in use; however, idling equipment exert noise. The requirement to turn off idling equipment is effective at reducing noise generated from construction sites. The third bullet calls for maintaining equipment such that loads are secure and do not unnecessarily generate noise from rattling and banging that can be caused from unsecure equipment or materials moving around in a vehicle while in motion. This requirement is effective at reducing noise generated from construction sites.
While these three measures are supplemental to the requirement provided under Mitigation Measure 3.11-3, they are effective at minimizing the impact of construction noise although the impact has already been determined to be less than significant.
3570
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-110 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Mitigation Measure 3.11-3 and 3.11-4 are appropriate mitigation measures for the project, and will ensure that construction noise does not exceed the timing threshold. The commenter has suggested the use of a temporary sound barrier during construction to reduce noise levels. While the measure is not required per the City’s Municipal Code, Mitigation Measure 3.11-3 is modified to incorporate a requirement for installation of sound barriers along the boundary of the Development Area to minimize construction related impacts on neighbors. The addition of this as a mitigation will not change the requirement to also limit construction activities to daytime hours in alignment with the Municipal Code.
Response L-5-13a: This comment states that “The EIR admits that “impervious surfaces such as pavement, significantly reduce infiltration capacity and increase surface water runoff.” (Draft EIR, p. 3.9-24, emphasis added.) As discussed above, however, the draft EIR presumes, without providing any analysis, that the presence of “hardpan” soils in fewer than half of the bore samples taken as part of the geotechnical analysis established that converting a 77-acre orchard to impervious surfaces would not significantly impact groundwater recharge. (Draft EIR, p. 3.9-25.) Several commenters pointed out the serious flaws in this conclusory claim, which is contradicted by the fifty-plus years of successful agriculture at the Project site. The final EIR retains the unsupported conclusion that hardpan makes the Project’s impacts on groundwater recharge less than significant, but also purports to adopt the conclusions in a supplemental hydrological analysis prepared for the applicant. (Final EIR, p. 2.0-8.) The supplemental hydrological analysis, however, acknowledges that deep percolation does occur at the orchard, despite the few areas of cemented and/or “clayey” soils found in the geological study. (Final EIR, Appendix L, pp. 9-10.) Moreover, the supplemental analysis admits that irrigation and deep percolation in the northern area of the orchard does affect groundwater levels in the Quail Run neighborhood. (Id., p. 10.).
• The presence of hardpan soils in some of the geotechnical bore samples at the Project site was provided in the DEIR for appropriate context. However, the presence of hardpan was not the basis for the DEIR’s conclusion that the Project would have a less than significant impact on groundwater recharge. The DEIR reached that conclusion based on several factors, most notably the fact that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions. At full build-out, total water demand for the Project would be approximately 255.8 AFY.
Since at least 2020, less than half of the City’s water supplies have derived from groundwater pumping; instead, most of the City’s supplies come from the City’s surface water rights or stored water. In other words, actual groundwater usage 3571
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-111 following the completion of the Project will be less than half (i.e., less than 127.9 AFY, and decreasing over time) of the Project’s total consumptive water use. As such, the Project’s groundwater usage will be less than historic groundwater usage at the site as estimated in either the Schmidt Report or the WSA. Moreover, the proportion of the City’s water supply needs that will be served by groundwater extractions will continue to decrease through at least 2030. In addition, unlike the historic agricultural uses on the Property, the City’s water supplies do not draw from onsite wells, but rather from wells located in other locations within and around the City of Clovis. Further, a significant amount of the site will remain pervious (i.e. landscaping front and backyards, parks, open space, etc.). To the extent that runoff occurs offsite because of impervious surfaces, groundwater recharge associated with runoff would occur in nearby FMFCD stormwater facilities. Because the project’s groundwater usage is less than the status quo (i.e., the pecan orchard), the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management under the applicable GSA or result in any potentially significant impacts related to groundwater resources.
Response L-5-13b: This comment states that “The EIR must be revised and recirculated to actually analyze the effects that replacing the orchard with 70+ acres of impervious surfaces will have on groundwater recharge rates. Even with the supplemental hydrological analysis, the EIR provides no comparison of groundwater recharge rates with or without the Project. (Final EIR, p. 2.0-8 [“it can be presumed that the Project site generally does not allow for a high level of groundwater recharge in its existing condition[,]” emphasis added].)6 The Supreme Court has “made clear, and recently reiterated, that “ ‘[i]nformation “scattered here and there in EIR appendices” or a report “buried in an appendix,” is not a substitute for “a good faith reasoned analysis.” ’ ” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.5th 497, 516.) The EIR fails as an informational document because it leaves the public and those affected by the Project to “guess” at what the potential groundwater recharge impacts would be.”
• The agricultural operation demands are currently extracted from wells onsite.
Ceasing the agricultural operation will result in a net improvement in the aquifer on an annual basis when compared to the existing condition. This is a beneficial impact to the aquifer immediately under the Project site.
The DEIR’s conclusion that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions, is based on several factors, most notably the fact that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions. At full build-out, total water demand for the Project would be approximately 255.8 3572
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-112 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North AFY. Since at least 2020, less than half of the City’s water supplies have derived from groundwater pumping; instead, most of the City’s supplies come from the City’s surface water rights or stored water. In other words, actual groundwater usage following the completion of the Project will be less than half (i.e., less than 127.9 AFY, and decreasing over time) of the Project’s total consumptive water use. As such, the Project’s groundwater usage will be less than historic groundwater usage at the site as estimated in either the Schmidt Report or the WSA. Moreover, the proportion of the City’s water supply needs that will be served by groundwater extractions will continue to decrease through at least 2030. In addition, unlike the historic agricultural uses on the Property, the City’s water supplies do not draw from onsite wells, but rather from wells located in other locations within and around the City of Clovis. Further, a significant amount of the site will remain pervious (i.e. landscaping front and backyards, parks, open space, etc.). To the extent that runoff occurs offsite because of impervious surfaces, groundwater recharge associated with runoff would occur in nearby FMFCD stormwater facilities. Because the project’s groundwater usage is less than the status quo (i.e., the pecan orchard), the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management under the applicable GSA or result in any potentially significant impacts related to groundwater resources.
Response L-5-13c: This comment states that “The supplemental hydrological analysis concludes that the net effect of ceasing all groundwater pumping at the Project site, originally used for irrigation, would result in a benefit to local groundwater levels because more water would remain in the ground. (Final EIR, Appendix L, p. 13.) While this conclusion has superficial appeal, it is ultimately mistaken and unsupported by the evidence.” • The extraction of water from the groundwater table for the orchard irrigation has historically resulted in a net loss of water to the groundwater table. The reduction of pumping water from the groundwater table at the Project site for use in irrigating orchard trees would cease to exist. This would leave more water within the groundwater table in this location. The DEIR indicates that the proposed project would use water from the City of Clovis distribution system as opposed to on-site wells. In terms of groundwater, there would be an overall reduction in groundwater pumpage. The water supply from the City that will serve the Project site is not from water directly below the Project site, but instead, it will be from offsite City wells. The net change will be less water demand from the water table immediately under the Project site that is shared with the surrounding neighborhoods. The amount of storm drainage percolation from the project site is very limited given that the precipitation levels are very low, and the soil 3573
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-113 composition is such that the Project site does not serve as a significant recharge area for the groundwater.
The DEIR’s conclusion that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions, is based on several factors, most notably the fact that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions. At full build-out, total water demand for the Project would be approximately 255.8 AFY. Since at least 2020, less than half of the City’s water supplies have derived from groundwater pumping; instead, most of the City’s supplies come from the City’s surface water rights or stored water. In other words, actual groundwater usage following the completion of the Project will be less than half (i.e., less than 127.9 AFY, and decreasing over time) of the Project’s total consumptive water use. As such, the Project’s groundwater usage will be less than historic groundwater usage at the site as estimated in either the Schmidt Report or the WSA. Moreover, the proportion of the City’s water supply needs that will be served by groundwater extractions will continue to decrease through at least 2030. In addition, unlike the historic agricultural uses on the Property, the City’s water supplies do not draw from onsite wells, but rather from wells located in other locations within and around the City of Clovis. Further, a significant amount of the site will remain pervious (i.e. landscaping front and backyards, parks, open space, etc.). To the extent that runoff occurs offsite because of impervious surfaces, groundwater recharge associated with runoff would occur in nearby FMFCD stormwater facilities. Because the project’s groundwater usage is less than the status quo (i.e., the pecan orchard), the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management under the applicable GSA or result in any potentially significant impacts related to groundwater resources.
Response L-5-13d: This comment states that “First, the assumptions in the supplemental hydrological analysis conflict with the Water Supply Analysis (WSA). For example, the WSA states that current water use at the project site is 186.4 acre-feet per year (AFY) for irrigation and that the proposed 605 homes would require 255.8 AFY. (Draft EIR, Exhibit J, pp. 2- 1, 3-1.) The supplemental hydrological analysis, however, claims that approximately 400 AFY will remain in the ground because irrigation of the orchard has ceased. (Final EIR, Appendix L, p. 9.) The supplemental hydrological analysis provides no explanation for its claim that more than twice the amount of water is used for irrigation than what is disclosed in the WSA. (Cf. id.) More importantly, there is no requirement or commitment in the EIR or WSA that the wells at the project site will be retired, nor any guarantee that the claimed 400 AFY will actually remain in the ground to benefit local groundwater levels. “Argument, speculation, [and] unsubstantiated opinion or 3574
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-114 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North narrative” do not constitute substantial evidence. (Guidelines, § 15384, subd. (a).) Accordingly, the EIR’s conclusion that groundwater recharge will not be negatively impacted by converting 77 acres of orchard to impervious surfaces is not supported by substantial evidence.”
The DEIR’s conclusion that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions, is based on several factors, most notably the fact that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions. At full build-out, total water demand for the Project would be approximately 255.8 AFY. Since at least 2020, less than half of the City’s water supplies have derived from groundwater pumping; instead, most of the City’s supplies come from the City’s surface water rights or stored water. In other words, actual groundwater usage following the completion of the Project will be less than half (i.e., less than 127.9 AFY, and decreasing over time) of the Project’s total consumptive water use. As such, the Project’s groundwater usage will be less than historic groundwater usage at the site as estimated in either the Schmidt Report or the WSA. Moreover, the proportion of the City’s water supply needs that will be served by groundwater extractions will continue to decrease through at least 2030. In addition, unlike the historic agricultural uses on the Property, the City’s water supplies do not draw from onsite wells, but rather from wells located in other locations within and around the City of Clovis. Further, a significant amount of the site will remain pervious (i.e. landscaping front and backyards, parks, open space, etc.). To the extent that runoff occurs offsite because of impervious surfaces, groundwater recharge associated with runoff would occur in nearby FMFCD stormwater facilities. Because the project’s groundwater usage is less than the status quo (i.e., the pecan orchard), the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management under the applicable GSA or result in any potentially significant impacts related to groundwater resources.
The commenter also claims that there is no guarantee that the wells at the project site will be retired, nor any guarantee that the estimated water will remain in the ground to benefit local groundwater levels. The commenter is directed to Mitigation Measure 3.8-1 (provided below), which is a mitigation measure, and functionally a guarantee that the existing wells will be properly abandoned. The fact that the existing wells will be abandoned is evidence that the estimated water will remain in the ground to benefit groundwater levels because there be no wells available for extraction. The DEIR explains that water used for the new homes/residents would come from the City of Clovis infrastructure and water supplies, which come from wells located in a different location than the project site.
3575
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-115 Mitigation Measure 3.8-1: Prior to the acceptance of improvements, the Project proponent shall hire a licensed well contractor to obtain a well abandonment permit from Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division, and properly abandon the on-site wells, pursuant to review and approval of the City Engineer and the Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division.
Response L-5-13e: This comment states that “Lastly, the supplemental hydrological analysis explains that “Rural residential areas should have a net zero water balance, meaning that recharge of storm runoff should equal or exceed the consumptive use.” (Final EIR, Appendix L, p. 11.) The EIR, however, admits that storm runoff from the 77-acre project site would be collected and transported off-site into the City’s stormwater infrastructure, making the “net zero water balance” impossible to achieve for this rural residential area. (See Draft EIR, pp. 3.9-22 through 3.9-23.) The EIR fails to analyze the impacts of upsetting the existing groundwater balance caused by the Project. The EIR must be revised and recirculated to address the Project’s potentially significant groundwater recharge impacts.”
• The DEIR’s conclusion that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions, is based on several factors, most notably the fact that the Project’s onsite groundwater usage would be less than existing conditions. At full build-out, total water demand for the Project would be approximately 255.8 AFY. Since at least 2020, less than half of the City’s water supplies have derived from groundwater pumping; instead, most of the City’s supplies come from the City’s surface water rights or stored water. In other words, actual groundwater usage following the completion of the Project will be less than half (i.e., less than 127.9 AFY, and decreasing over time) of the Project’s total consumptive water use. As such, the Project’s groundwater usage will be less than historic groundwater usage at the site as estimated in either the Schmidt Report or the WSA. Moreover, the proportion of the City’s water supply needs that will be served by groundwater extractions will continue to decrease through at least 2030. In addition, unlike the historic agricultural uses on the Property, the City’s water supplies do not draw from onsite wells, but rather from wells located in other locations within and around the City of Clovis. Further, a significant amount of the site will remain pervious (i.e. landscaping front and backyards, parks, open space, etc.). To the extent that runoff occurs offsite because of impervious surfaces, groundwater recharge associated with runoff would occur in nearby FMFCD stormwater facilities. Because the project’s groundwater usage is less than the status quo (i.e., the pecan orchard), the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management under the applicable GSA or result in any potentially significant impacts related to groundwater resources. 3576
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-116 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response L-5-14a: This comment states that “As stated above, the EIR admits that the Project would have a significant VMT impact. (Draft EIR, p. 3.13-23.) The EIR, however, incorrectly presumes that there are no feasible mitigation measures that could reduce this significant impact. CEQA case law is clear that an EIR cannot conclude an impact is significant and unavoidable without first exhausting all feasible mitigation measures. (Friant Ranch, supra, 6 Cal.5th at pp. 524-525 [“Even when a project's benefits outweigh its unmitigated effects, agencies are still required to implement all mitigation measures unless those measures are truly infeasible.” Emphasis added].) Here, the EIR includes a perfunctory analysis of a handful of “Project design features” and fails to truly grapple with the issue. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.13-19 through 3.13-22.) As at least one commenter pointed out, however, the EIR fails to analyze the feasibility of public transit options to mitigate significant VMT impacts. (See Final EIR, p. 2.0- 135.) The final EIR impermissibly dismisses this comment by pointing to the general discussion of transit in the environmental setting and concludes, without explanation, that transit was addressed in the EIR. (Id. at p. 2.0-136; see Draft EIR, p. 3.13-8.)”. • Project VMT can only be reduced by changes in residents’ behavioral pattern.
Project VMT, or in general average VMT for project residents is a function of regional and project location, neighborhood and surrounding land uses, local access to amenities, availability of different modes of transportation, among others. As such, projects that are near complementary land uses and transportation mode choices tend to exhibit low VMT trends. Given the location of the project, the project has limited options of surrounding land uses and transportation modes. As such, VMT cannot be reduced to any reasonable degree through the adoption of specific mitigation measures.
Within the state of California, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) “Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity – Designed for Local Governments, Communities, and Project Developers” dated December 2021 is recognized as a compliant source of VMT reduction measures.
The implementation of these measures was considered as project design features. All measures were evaluated relative to the project to determine applicability and feasibility. Measures that were deemed feasible are identified in the Section 3.13 Transportation in the DEIR as a project design measure. Some measures were deemed inapplicable or infeasible, as discussed below.
The potential measures include mitigation related to land use, trip reduction programs, parking or road pricing/management, neighborhood design and transit. Measures related to trip reduction programs could only be implemented 3577
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-117 by employers and is not applicable to residential projects. Measures related to parking or road pricing/management are only applicable to multifamily residential projects. And to the extent the City could impose any measures identified in the CAPCOA manual, these measures would not result in any measurable reduction in VMT’s for the Project. The project, as described in the TIA and DEIR, includes all feasible land use related and neighborhood design related mitigation measures as project design features. As such, after an extensive review of all potential VMT reduction options listed in the CAPCOA manual, the City and its air quality experts concluded the Project’s potential impacts to VMT could be further mitigated through implementing mitigation measures. The mitigation measures are incorporated into the Project as designed measures and a detailed discussion of these measures is provided in Chapter 3.13 Transportation in the DEIR.
The commenter’s second argument is that the Final EIR impermissibly dismisses transit comments in the Final EIR by pointing to a general discussion of transit in the EIR. It is true that transit is discussed within the DEIR in Section 3.13. Page
3.13.8 provides a discussion of the transit services available to the Study area.
This is specifically in contrast to what the commenter is suggesting the DEIR does not provide. The DEIR discussion of available transit notes that Clovis Transit Stageline Routes 10 and 80 operate within the Study Area. It further notes that Route 10 operates from Monday through Saturday, while Route 80 operates only on school days, based on the Clovis Unified School District schedule. It also notes that Route 10 provide access to Fresno State University and Route 80 provides access to the Buchanan Education Complex. The DEIR also indicates that Fresno Area Express (FAX) operates within the Study Area along Willow Avenue 7 days a week. The route connects communities in Fresno to the different campuses of Clovis Community College. In addition to fixed route services, Round Up is the Clovis paratransit service for disabled City residents. Round Up transit vehicles are all accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. These are all preexisting transit services available to the Project that will help to reduce VMT.
Further public transit options would not be feasible because they would not result in usage or ridership sufficient to actually reduce VMT to any degree. The theory that an increase in transit service would result in an increase in ridership is not reflected in the research published by the Transit Cooperative Research Board’s 3578
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-118 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North “Analysis of Recent Public Transit Ridership Trends9. The research from this analysis shows that the relationship between transit ridership and three (3) other major factors influence ridership: 1) population, 2) transit-dependent population (i.e. zero-vehicle household, and 3) transit service levels (i.e. transit vehicle revenue miles). In very urban areas like San Francisco where it is very densely populated and residents often do not have vehicles, transit becomes an optimal transportation option and ridership is high. Alternatively, in suburban areas such as Clovis with lower population density and when residents often have one or more vehicle in the household, increases in ridership are not be proportional to increases in transit service. This is particularly true here, where public transit in the vicinity of the Project already exists, and further public transportation options would merely augment existing options in a manner that is largely duplicative of those services. As a result, significantly increasing transit services available in suburban or rural areas of Clovis is not anticipated to proportionately increase the ridership of the transit. These relationships of transit ridership in suburban and rural areas such as Clovis are fully supported by the research stated above.
This is not to say that there will not be any transit used in these areas, but the research does suggest that the transit ridership in this area has a limit that will not increase beyond the limit by simply increasing transit service. It would be unsupported and speculative to claim that VMT per capita would be significantly reduced more than is already reflected in the DEIR by oversaturating transit services in an area that would not fully absorb the saturated transit available. The VMT analysis appropriately assumes a correct level of transit usage.
Response L-5-14b: This comment states that “The final EIR completely misses the point of the comment, which asks the City to analyze the potential of increased transit as mitigation for the Project’s admittedly significant VMT impacts, and must be revised to analyze whether feasible transit options exist that could reduce the Project’s significant VMT impacts. (Guidelines, § 15088, subd. (c) [comments raising “recommendations and objections … must be addressed in detail giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted”].) The final EIR fails to adequately respond to this comment.7.” • Response L-5-15a provides the reasons that increased transit as mitigation for the significant VMT impacts is not a feasible mitigation to reduce the Project’s VMT.
In short, the existing transit services discussed will be available. These transit services have established an appropriate level of transit for the demand within 9 Transit Cooperative Research Board’s “Analysis of Recent Public Transit Ridership Trends (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Transit Cooperative Research Program; Kari Watkins; Simon Berrebi; Chandler Diffee; Becca Kiriazes; David Ederer, 2020) 3579
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-119 the region. The concept of increasing transit would increase the saturation of transit available in the region, but would not be effective in reducing VMT because transit ridership would not significantly increase.
Response L-5-14c: This comment states that “Additionally, as pointed out by Caltrans, the EIR should consider other potentially feasible mitigation measures, such as creating a VMT Mitigation Impact Fee, to address the Project’s significant VMT impacts. (Final EIR, p.
2.0-161.) Again, the final EIR improperly dismisses Caltrans comment without either adopting the recommendation of that expert agency or explaining why a VMT mitigation impact fee is not feasible mitigation for the Project. (Id. [“Comment noted”].) The EIR must be revised to actually consider and address Caltrans’ comments and must be revised to analyze the feasibility of the many mitigation measures available to address the Project’s significant VMT impact, including increased transit. (See Exhibit 10 [Caltrans SB 743 Program Mitigation Playbook], 11 [Berkely Law – Implementing SB 743].)
• The commenter suggests a VMT Mitigation Impact Fee program be implemented entirely by the project, to address the Project’s significant VMT impacts. It should be noted that Caltrans recommended the City to ‘consider’ a VMT Impact Mitigation Fee for all future projects. As such, Caltrans is not recommending that the Shepherd North Project itself develop a VMT Impact Mitigation fee program.
VMT mitigation fee programs are intended to allow program-level mitigation to take place, where mitigation at the project level alone may not be effective. It should be noted that a VMT fee for this project alone, would not reasonably reduce VMT. As such, these fee programs are a regional envelop that combines the cumulative effect of all future developments, determine feasible program level mitigation measure that can eliminate the impacts of these developments, and aims to create a funding mechanism for implementation of these mitigation measures. The City of Clovis is yet to establish a VMT Mitigation Fee, and it is not known whether such a Program would be established in Clovis. The establishment of a mitigation fee program is a matter of legislated action on the local level, utilizing the local police powers provided to the City of Clovis under California law.
Such power to establish a mitigation fee cannot be performed by the Project applicant, being that they do not possess the local police powers of the City. It is not feasible to impose such a requirement at a project-level.
Response L-5-14d: This comment states that “The EIR fails to analyze the Project’s potential impacts to transit. The EIR acknowledges that public transportation services exist “within the Study Area.” (Draft EIR, p. 3.13-8.) The EIR’s analysis of impacts to the circulation 3580
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-120 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North system, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, however, does not analyze the Project’s potential impacts on these transit systems. (See id. at pp. 3.13-23 through
3.13-25.) The failure to consider this potential impact is a violation of CEQA and the EIR must be revised and recirculated to analyze the Project’s potential impacts to the transit system. (Yerba Buena Neighborhood Consortium, LLC v. Regents of University of California (2023) 95 Cal.App.5th 779, 799-807 [EIR failed to analyze potential transit impacts].).”
• The contention that the DEIR fails to analyze the Project’s impacts on transit is not accurate. The proposal does not remove a transit station, bus stop, or other transit facility, nor does it impede existing transit service. Transit ridership is anticipated to be low, but, nevertheless, there will be transit service available to the area. The proposed Project does not have any significant impacts on transit.
Response L-5-14e: This comment states that “Moreover, the EIR’s conclusion that the Project “would not result in a conflict with an existing or planned … transit service/facility” is not supported by substantial evidence. (Draft EIR, p. 3.13-25.) The EIR claims that, despite “the absence of a fee program where the Project has an impact on the roadway network,” the Project’s impacts will be less than significant because “the Project will pay its respective fair share for the proposed improvements.” (Id.) The EIR, however, includes no mitigation measures or any other enforceable requirement that the Project actually “pay its respective fair share” of anything. That, however, is not good enough to satisfy CEQA. (See King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of Kern (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 814, 855, 857-858 [finding inadequate a mitigation measure that required the project applicant to “increase” the use of “produced water” and “reduce” the use of “municipal and industrial quality” water “to the extent feasible”; the terms “increase” and “reduce,” even when modified by the phrase “to the extent feasible,” are not specific performance standards]; San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth v.
City and County of San Francisco (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 61, 79-80 [finding inadequate a mitigation measure that required a project applicant to expand a city's busing “capacity by paying an unspecified amount of money at an unspecified time in compliance with an as yet unenforced or unspecified transit funding mechanism.” Emphasis added].) (See Guidelines, § 15126.4, subd. (a)(2) [“Mitigation measures must be full enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legallybinding instruments”].) In the absence of any requirement that the Project actually pay for its fair share of roadway improvements, the EIR cannot claim the Project’s impacts would be less than significant. Further, without a plan or program to actually construct the improvements, this “quasi-mitigation” is unenforceable and violates 3581
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-121 CEQA. (Anderson First Coalition v. City of Anderson (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 1173, 1189.).”
• The contention that DEIR “includes no mitigation measures or any other enforceable requirement that the Project actually “pay its respective fair share” of anything…is not good enough to satisfy CEQA” does not accurately characterize the enforcement requirements of the Fresno County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee or the City’s traffic fee mitigation program. These are adopted fee programs that are in effect and made a condition of approval on all projects in the City of Clovis. A condition of approval means it is a requirement and enforceable. All requirements of the Project must be implemented to obtain future permits (i.e. grading permits, building permits, certificate of occupancy, etc.). The Project will pay for its fair share of roadway improvements through these adopted programs by virtue of the conditions of approval, and these adopted programs are effective at constructing improvements as evidenced by the long history of the agencies administering the program completing new transportation improvement projects. The condition on the Project to pay its fair share is fully enforceable through the conditions. Given the fee programs are adopted and placed as conditions, they are binding on the Project.
Response L-5-14f: This comment states that “The EIR also ignores significant transportation safety impacts of the Project identified by Caltrans. As stated in Caltrans’ comments on the draft EIR, Project traffic would significantly impact queueing at the SR 168 and Hendon Avenue interchange ramps and recommends mitigation measures for those impacts. (Final EIR, p. 2.0-159.) The final EIR, however, dismisses Caltrans’ comments, claiming they relate to level of service (LOS) impacts that are no longer required in a CEQA analysis. (Id.)8 The EIR is mistaken. Caltrans published an Interim Local Development Intergovernmental Review (LDIGR) Safety Review guidance for state and local agencies to integrate into their CEQA analyses to address safety impacts on public roadways, including those under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, caused by traffic generated by development projects. (See Exhibit 12 [Caltrans LDIGR guidance].) Caltrans LDIGR guidance is completely consistent with the State’s transition from LOS to VMT as the appropriate measure of transportation impacts. (See id.) Accordingly, the EIR’s failure to analyze and mitigate the significant transportation safety impacts of the Project requires revision and recirculation.”
• As explained in the DEIR, the intersections of SR-168 Westbound Ramps/Herndon Avenue and SR-168 Eastbound Ramps/Herndon Avenue are forecast to operate at a satisfactory LOS under all scenarios, except for the Fowler Avenue/SR-168 Eastbound Ramps, which are currently operating at a deficient LOS. The Project 3582
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-122 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North does not create any new operational deficiency or additional safety impacts at this location and further, any congestion and/or safety effects associated with the existing deficiencies would be avoided because of planned projects within the Regional Transportation program.
Moreover, the freeway Off-ramp queuing analysis included in TIA shows that the project does not create any safety concerns on State facilities. As a result, there would not be any potentially significant impact as to traffic or traffic safety.
Response L-5-14g: This comment states that “8 Moreover, the final EIR’s claim that mitigating the impacts identified by Caltrans are not feasible is completely unsupported by analysis or substantial evidence. (Cf. id.) The final EIR fails to explain what “geometric constraints” make Caltrans’ proposed mitigation infeasible. (See Guidelines, § 15088, subd. (c).) “
• In its comment letter on the DEIR, Caltrans recommended extending the left turn storage lanes on eastbound Herndon Avenue, by removing/reducing the existing median between eastbound and westbound traffic along Herndon Avenue. The current storage length is 240 feet for the dual eastbound left-turn lanes at the intersection of Clovis Avenue/Herndon Avenue. Although extending the length of storage may improve level of service (LOS), maintaining the current storage length of 240 feet would not result in any potentially significant traffic impacts. This is because congestion/LOS is not a potentially significant level of service. Further, maintaining the current storage length at 240 feet would not create conditions that would result in potentially significant traffic safety impacts.
Response L-5-15: This comment states that “The EIR cites the WSA in support of its conclusion that the City has adequate water to supply the Project and that constructing water infrastructure would not significantly impact the environment. (See Draft EIR, pp. 3.14- 26 through 3.14-30.) The WSA, however, admits that, based on the buildout assumptions in the City’s General Plan, the Project’s water supply will need to be replaced in order for there to be enough water to serve all the development contemplated in the General Plan. (Draft EIR, Appendix J, p. 8-1.) The EIR completely ignores this aspect of the WSA and does not include any analysis of the need to replace the Project’s water supply at full build out of the General Plan, or the environmental impacts of doing so. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.14-26 through 3.14-30.) Notably, the cumulative impacts chapter of the EIR adopts the “projections” method for analyzing cumulative impacts, which requires the EIR to analyze the Project’s individual contribution to impacts along with the development projections in local plans, including the City’s 3583
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-123 General Plan. (Draft EIR, pp. 4.0-2 through 4.0-3.) The EIR fails to do so with respect to cumulative water supply impacts.”
• Water supply is addressed in DEIR Section 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality and in Section 3.14 Utilities, and in the Master Responses provided in the Final EIR, which address ground and surface water supplies, including contracts that secure water. The DEIR references the City of Clovis Urban Water Management Plan 2020 Update (Provost & Pritchard, 2021B), City of Clovis Water Shortage Contingency Plan 2020 Update (Provost & Pritchard, 2021A); the City of Clovis Water Master Plan Update Phase III (Provost & Pritchard, 2017), and the California’s Groundwater: Bulletin 118 - San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin/Kings Subbasin (DWR 2006) as a source of information to support the analysis of water supply.
The DEIR indicates that the City has access to surface water through several different contracts, all of which are delivered to the City by the Fresno Irrigation District (FID). (DEIR p. 3.9-4). The City’s groundwater system contains more than 30 wells with a total capacity of approximately 37,690 gallons per minute with another 4,750 gpm of additional capacity planned in the next few years.
The DEIR (p. 3.14-28 through 3.14-30) provides a Projected Water Demand for the Proposed Project. The Project would receive water supply from the City’s water distribution system, which relies on both groundwater and surface water supplies as described above. According to the Water Supply Assessment, the proposed Project has an associated Land Use-based Water Demand Factor (WDF of 3.3 AFY/acre associated with Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) based on the City’s UWMP. The projected water demand is shown in Table 3.14-7 of the DEIR on page 3.14-28. The total projected annual potable water demand is projected to be 255.8 AFY. The DEIR notes that total proposed water demand amounts to approximately 1.6% of the excess supply for year 2030 the City has in a normal year (as shown in Table ES-3 of the 2020 UWMP). This indicates an ability of the City to serve this project, but it notes that additional supplies must be acquired by the City to accommodate full build-out of the GP. The commenter suggests that “The EIR completely ignores this aspect of the WSA and does not include any analysis of the need to replace the Project’s water supply at full build out of the General Plan, or the environmental impacts of doing so,” however, the DEIR does acknowledge that additional supplies will need to be acquired to accommodate full build-out of the GP (p. 3.14-28). This is not considered a “significant impact” or “cumulatively considerable,” but rather, it is common for a City to need to expand its water supply as a City grows. It is not practicable for 3584
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-124 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North the City to prematurely invest in a water supply that may not be needed for 20 or more years, and similarly, the City will not prematurely expand other services and infrastructure before they are needed. The City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) is updated every four to five years and a new plan is established to ensure water in the near term, while also considering the long-term buildout of the General Plan. The Water Supply Assessment has been prepared following the latest UWMP. Pursuant to Water Code section 10910, subdivision (c)(4) and based on the technical analyses described in the UWMP, the total projected water supplies determined to be available for the proposed Project during Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry years during a 20-year projection will meet the projected water demand associated with the proposed Project, in addition to existing and planned future uses.
A comparison of the City’s projected potable and raw water supplies and demands is shown in Table 3.14-8 of the Draft EIR (p. 3.14-29 through 3.14-30) for Normal, Single Dry, and Multiple Dry Years. The data shows that demand within the City’s service area is not expected to exceed the City’s supplies in any Normal year between 2020 and 2040. From this analysis, the City’s water demands are not expected to exceed water supplies in Single Dry Years or Multiple Dry Years. Because of the longer-term analysis of the Water Supply Assessment (year 2040), the analysis is a long-term cumulative outlook. The results of the analysis are carried through in the Cumulative Chapter of the DEIR (Section 4.0), where it accurately reflects the findings of the cumulative analysis presented in Section 3.14 Utilities.
Response L-5-16a: This comment states that “As stated above, the EIR adopts the “projections” methodology for analyzing cumulative impacts. (Draft EIR, pp. 4.0-2 through 4.0-3.) The purported analysis of cumulative impacts, however, simply repeats the previous analyses of the Project specific impacts and concludes that nothing would be different in the cumulative scenario. (See, e.g., Draft EIR, pp. 4.0-3 through 4.0-6, 4.0-9 through
4.0-10.) This analysis is fundamentally flawed…The purpose of a cumulative impact analysis is to require agencies to consider whether the impacts of individual projects, even if less-than-significant on their own, may nevertheless be cumulatively considerable when analyzed together with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. “‘The significance of a comprehensive cumulative impacts evaluation is stressed in CEQA.’ [Citation.] Proper cumulative impact analysis is vital ‘because the full environmental impact of a proposed project cannot be gauged in a vacuum. One of the most important environmental lessons that has been learned is that environmental damage often occurs incrementally from a 3585
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-125 variety of small sources. These sources appear insignificant when considered individually, but assume threatening dimensions when considered collectively with other sources with which they interact.’ [Citations.] ‘[C]onsideration of the effects of a project or projects as if no others existed would encourage the piecemeal approval of several projects that, taken together, could overwhelm the natural environment and disastrously overburden the man-made infrastructure and vital community services.
This would effectively defeat CEQA’s mandate to review the actual effect of the projects upon the environment.’” (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214–1215.).”
• A cumulative analysis is provided in Section 4.0 of the DEIR. The DEIR notes that “Cumulative settings are identified under each cumulative impact analysis.
Cumulative settings vary because the area that the impact may affect is different.
For example, noise impacts generally only impact the local surrounding area because noise travels a relatively short distance, while air quality impacts affect the whole air basin as wind currents control air flow and are not generally affected by natural or manmade barriers which would affect noise...” The DEIR then indicates projection approach is used for the analysis. The projection approach uses a summary of projections in adopted General Plans or related planning documents to identify potential cumulative impacts. The projection approach for the cumulative analysis considers full buildout of the General Plan.
The DEIR then provides a cumulative analysis for each environmental topic. It is noteworthy that State CEQA Guidelines section 15130, subdivision (b) specifies that a cumulative impact analysis may be less detailed than the analysis of the project's individual effects. The cumulative analysis provided in the DEIR includes a discussion of the project characteristics and impacts, then discusses the impacts anticipated under the cumulative condition. For instance, the cumulative analysis of visual character (Aesthetics and Visual Resources topic) in the Draft EIR states the following: “Under cumulative conditions, buildout of the General Plan for Clovis and the surrounding jurisdictions could result in changes to the visual character and quality of the City of Clovis through development of undeveloped areas and/or changes to the character of existing communities. Development of the proposed Project, in addition to other future projects in the area, would change the existing visual and scenic qualities of the City. However, the City of Clovis has adopted specific landscape and design standards to enhance the visual appearance of the Project site and adjacent areas. As such, this is a less than significant cumulative impact. As such, impacts relative to degradation of visual character would be a less than cumulatively considerable contribution and no 3586
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-126 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North mitigation is required. This is just one example of a cumulative analysis presented for each environmental topic on pages 4.0-3 through 4.0-26. The above excerpt shows that the cumulative analysis does consider cumulative impacts from the visual changes that would occur as development occurs throughout the region.
In some cumulative analyses provided in the DEIR, such as under the cumulative analysis of agricultural resources on page 4.0-6, the project-level impact determination is critically important in considering the physical change within the cumulative context. For instance, the Project site is no longer a viable agricultural option given the lack of water reliability, and other reasons discussed in previous responses, combined with the fact that conversion of the land does not exceed a threshold of significance established by the State as shown in the LESA model.
These facts support the conclusion that the impact is less than significant. When you consider this Project-level impact conclusion relative to the cumulative context for agricultural land in the County (i.e. total acreage of crop land - 1,355,142 acres), the change is a conversion of 0.0058% (1/5800th) of the total agricultural land available, which has notably been determined to also not be economically viable any longer. The only valid conclusion to be drawn from these facts is that the impact is less than cumulatively considerable impact.
In some cases, the DEIR includes a cumulative impact analysis in the topical section (Section 3). For instance, Section 3.3 Air Quality, page 3.3-27 includes a cumulative analysis under the impact “Impact 3.3-1: Project operation has the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment, or conflict or obstruct implementation of the District’s air quality plan. (Less than Significant)” and under “Impact 3.3-2: Proposed Project construction activities would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment, or conflict or obstruct implementation of the District’s air quality plan. (Less than Significant).” As noted on page 3.3-26 of the DEIR, “…air districts develop region-specific CEQA thresholds of significance in consideration of existing air quality concentrations and attainment or nonattainment designations under the NAAQS and CAAQS. The NAAQS and CAAQS are informed by a wide range of scientific evidence that demonstrates there are known safe concentrations of criteria pollutants. While recognizing that air quality is a cumulative problem, air districts typically consider projects that generate criteria pollutant and ozone precursor emissions below these thresholds to be minor in nature and would not adversely affect air quality such that the NAAQS or CAAQS would be exceeded.” This means that the Air District’s guidance, including their thresholds, are developed in consideration of the more regional 3587
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-127 concerns of air quality and the District’s ability to meet NAAQS and CAAQS through their planning. Under both analyses, the project-level analysis, is the same as the cumulative-level analysis because the thresholds are aimed at the cumulative problem of air quality in the region. As such, the conclusions from Section 3.3 are carried through and presented under the Section 4.0 Cumulative analysis for this topic.
Another example of a cumulative impact analysis in the topical section (Section 3) is under Section 3.6 Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change and Energy. Page 3.7- 21 discusses the cumulative nature of greenhouse gases as follow: “Cumulative impacts are the collective impacts of one or more past, present, and future projects that, when combined, result in adverse changes to the environment. In determining the significance of a project’s contribution to anticipated adverse future conditions, a lead agency should generally undertake a two‐step analysis.
The first question is whether the combined effects from both the proposed Project and other projects would be cumulatively significant. If the agency answers this inquiry in the affirmative, the second question is whether “the project’s incremental effects are cumulatively considerable” and thus significant in and of themselves. The cumulative global project list for this issue (climate change) comprises anthropogenic (i.e., human-made) GHG emissions sources across the globe. No project alone would reasonably be expected to contribute to a noticeable incremental change to the global climate, but rather effects are shown to be caused by the cumulative emissions from across the globe. However, legislation and executive orders on the subject of climate change in California have established a Statewide context and process for developing an enforceable Statewide cap on GHG emissions. Given the nature of environmental consequences from GHGs and global climate change, CEQA requires that lead agencies consider evaluating the cumulative impacts of GHGs. Small contributions to this cumulative impact (from which significant effects are occurring and are expected to worsen over time) may be potentially considerable and, therefore, significant.”
Impact 3.7-1 on page 3.7-22 states “Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. A project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale relative to global emissions, but could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. Implementation of 3588
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-128 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North the proposed Project would contribute to increases of GHG emissions that are associated with global climate change. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 and other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), from mobile sources and utility usage.” This means, like under the Air Quality analysis, the project-level analysis, is the same as the cumulative-level analysis because the thresholds are aimed at the cumulative problem of greenhouse gas emissions in the region. As such, the conclusions from Section 3.6 are carried through and presented under the Section 4.0 Cumulative analysis for this topic.
The cumulative analysis for energy (p. 4.0-10) is an example where the State has adopted state-wide standards to ensure that development is not inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. The cumulative discussion appropriately discloses that the proposed Project would comply with these standards. Additionally, there is nothing in the project that is considered “inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary” as it relates to energy. In addition to the absence of any component of the proposed Project being inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary, and the fact that the state-wide standards apply to all development in California and is intended to cumulatively reduce inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy, the conclusion is appropriately reported as less than cumulatively considerable on page 4.0-10.
Response L-5-16b: This comment states that “Here, the EIR does not actually consider the cumulative impacts of development projections in the General Plan together with the Project.
Instead, the EIR concludes, because the induvial impacts of this Project are small (as discussed above, however, the EIR is flawed in claiming that many of the Project’s impacts are less than significant) there is no need to go to the next step and measure the Project’s impacts together with those of development projected in the General Plan. (See, e.g., Draft EIR, pp. 4.0-3 through 4.0-6, 4.0-9 through 4.0-10.) The EIR must be revised to complete all the required steps of a CEQA compliant cumulative impacts analysis and then recirculated for an additional round of public review.” • As was discussed under Response L-5-16a, there are scenarios where a less than significant impact on a project level also results in a less than cumulatively considerable impact on a cumulative level. For instance, under the cumulative analysis of agricultural resources on page 4.0-6, the project-level impact analysis shows that the Project site is no longer a viable agricultural option given the lack of water reliability, and other reasons discussed in previous responses, combined with the fact that conversion of the land does not exceed a threshold of significance established by the State as shown in the LESA model. These facts 3589
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-129 support the conclusion that the impact is less than significant on a project-level.
In addition, when you consider this Project-level impact conclusion relative to the cumulative context for agricultural land in the County (i.e. total acreage of crop land - 1,355,142 acres), the change is a conversion of 0.0058% (1/5800th) of the total agricultural land available, which has notably been determined too also not be economically viable any longer. The only valid conclusion to be drawn from these facts is that the impact is less than cumulatively considerable impact in addition to being less than significant on a project-level.
There are other examples of cumulative analysis in the Draft EIR where the project-level impact and cumulative level impact are the same. This is not improper, it can simply be a result of an environmental topic being an environmental topic that by its very nature, is a cumulative consideration (i.e. greenhouse gas emissions and air quality). Thresholds for greenhouse gas emissions and air quality are established to effect emissions on a regional or statewide level, which is beyond the limits of the Project site and immediate surrounding. For such topics, the project-level analysis is the cumulative analysis.
Response L-5-17: This comment states that “The proposed resolution approving the vesting tentative tract map lacks adequate findings to support approval. Following this statement is several pages describing the commenters reasons for the statement. • The Planning Commission did not approve the vesting tentative tract map (TM6205). The Planning Commission denied all approvals and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council deny all approvals. The comment regarding the Planning Commission’s ability to approve the VTTM is moot.
Response L-5-18: This comment serves as concluding remarks, and indicates that the EIR is fundamentally flawed in multiple respects and fails as an information document. The commenter suggests that the EIR be revised. The commenter also provides several opinions relating to the Planning Commission’s ability to approve the VTTM. • The Draft EIR consists of two volumes, totaling 2,963 pages of information. This includes a substantial amount of technical analysis by experts in each respective technical discipline, each of which follows a method that is standard to the practice, or specifically defined in a rule or guideline. Each of the environmental topics claimed by the commenter to be fundamentally flawed have been thoroughly and appropriately analyzed, and a thorough response to the commenter’s claims is provided in the responses above.
The Project Description is addressed in DEIR Section 2.0 Project Description. This is an accurate representation of what is proposed (see also CEQA Guidelines, 3590
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-130 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Section 15124, subd. (c) [a project description need only include a “general description of the project’s technical, economic, and environmental characteristics, considering the principal engineering proposals if any and supporting public service facilities”]; Dry Creek Citizens Coalition v. County of Tulare (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 20, 26-36 [upholding a generalized project description against an attack arguing that it was insufficiently specific].) CEQA requires that a DEIR analyze a reasonable range of feasible alternatives that meet most or all project objectives while reducing or avoiding one or more significant environmental effects of the project. The range of alternatives required in a DEIR is governed by a “rule of reason” that requires a DEIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, subdivision (f). A DEIR must “set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice.” (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6, subdivision (f).) The CEQA Guidelines require only a “range of reasonable alternatives” and, thus limit the number and type of alternatives that need to be evaluated in an EIR. A DEIR need not include any alternatives inconsistent with the lead agency’s fundamental underlying purpose in proposing a project. (In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1166.). The following factors may be taken into consideration in the assessment of the feasibility of alternatives: site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plan or regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and the ability of the proponent to attain site control (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, subdivision (f) (1).)
Four (4) alternatives to the proposed Project were developed based on input from City staff and the technical analysis performed to identify the environmental effects of the proposed Project. A more detailed discussion of the alternatives is provided in Response L-5-6.
The Planning Commission did not approve the vesting tentative tract map (TM6205). The Planning Commission denied all approvals and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council deny all approvals. The comment regarding the Planning Commission’s ability to approve the VTTM is moot. 3591
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-131 L-6-1
L-6-2
L-6-3
L-6-4
L-6-5
L-6-6
L-6-7
3592
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-132 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-6-7 Cont
3593
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-133 Response to Letter L-6: Dean & Valerie Uhrig, Residents of Clovis Response L-6-1: This comment is an introductory statement, indicating first that the commenter objects to the Project. The commenter then states “Eventually, most of this area will be developed and though we're not excited about that we understand property owners rights to develop and/or expand the current use of their property. Also, City of Clovis is anxious to expand their sphere of influence to provide more housing particularly low to moderate income housing to meet California state requirements which Clovis is lacking.” • This comment is noted. There are no specific environmental concerns identified in the comment. This comment does not require any further response.
Response L-6-2: This comment states: “605 single-family homes is too many for this area due to limited roadways to handle increased traffic in our area. The stated top figure for square footage of homes (3020) is a large home not a low to moderate size home making it expensive to buy or rent. This will not address Clovis' housing shortage for low to moderate income families. ”
• The Project’s potential traffic impacts are addressed in Section 3.13 of the Draft EIR. Additional discussion was provided in Master Responses 7, 8, and 10. The City’s roadways are designed and improved to provide sufficient capacity to handle traffic in the area. The modeling shows that the roadways operation at an acceptable level of service with the planned improvements. The comments regarding the size and cost of homes and low to moderate income families is not a CEQA topic. Nevertheless, these comments will be provided to the City for its consideration.
Response L-6-3: This comment states: “In our area there are existing water shortages. This was brought up by residents at the last neighborhood meeting. Developer's answer that water will be from city wells is not satisfactory. All water going into city wells is ground water from all areas including Dry Creek Preserve area.”
• The Draft EIR has analyzed the potential impact of the project on water supplies.
The Final EIR also provided supplemental discussion on the topic. Water is specifically addressed in Master Responses 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The combination of the information contained in the Draft EIR and the Final EIR provide a sufficient analysis of water.
Response L-6-4: This comment states: “The traffic and water issues above do not reflect the total buildout and occupancy of the 2 Woodside Home developments already approved by the City and under construction; one on Teague and a larger one Fowler.” • The baseline, or existing condition, includes all existing development in Clovis.
The two Woodside Home developments that are referenced in the comment are 3594
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-134 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North part of the existing condition given that they are already approved projects, and some are partially built. The existing condition is represented in the project-level analysis, as well as the cumulative-level analysis.
Response L-6-5: This comment states: “A stop sign put in at Teague and N. Sunnyside was discussed during approval for the Woodside Home developments as a way to mitigate traffic on N.
Sunnyside. This has not been installed to date. We continue to see more and faster traffic coming from Nees or N. Shepherd from both directions because there are no traffic calming impediments. N. Sunnyside is a rural 2 lane country road but now used as a highway by commuters with speeds sometimes in excess of 80 mph. The posted speed limit is not adhered to and is 45 mph.”
• The TIA included an in-depth analysis of Sunnyside Avenue at the project vicinity.
As explained in the TIA, two signals have been proposed at the intersections of Sunnyside Avenue/Shepherd Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue/Nees Avenue, to eliminate the operational deficiency. Installing signals at these locations will also help alleviate speeding issues along this corridor. With the implementation of these signals along this corridor, the corridor is anticipated to experience improved traffic flow, and alleviate current safety concerns. Both signals are in the City’s Development Impact Fee program and the City will be implementing these improvements.
It is noted that the City and County are updating their MOU to add this 1-mile stretch of Sunnyside from Shepherd Avenue to Nees Avenue to the jurisdiction of Clovis with regards to enforcement of speeds. The City utilizes the police department to enforce speed limits, and violators that are caught are cited and fined. The comments on excessive speed on the roadway will be provided to the City Police Department so that they can be aware of the commenters’ observations of excessive speeding.
Additionally, as included in the TIA, the roadway segments of Sunnyside Avenue between Shepherd and Teague Avenue, and between Teague and Nees Avenue, as well as the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue/Teague Avenue is forecast to operate at or better than LOS D, consistent with City threshold, and County’s threshold within the City of Fresno and Clovis Sphere of Influence area. Therefore, no further improvements or traffic calming measures are recommended at the intersection of Sunnyside Avenue/Teague Avenue. Additionally, no additional traffic calming measure would be required for this area.
Response L-6-6: This comment states: “When Woodside homes proposed their projects they held many neighborhood meetings and were receptive to neighbor's concerns. Despite some contentious meetings they were open to discussion and worked with neighbors on 3595
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-135 concessions like lowering the amount of units and align houses facing Teague to be street facing to avoid a walled fortress look. This was brought up to Wilson Homes at the last meeting and they dismissed even discussing downsizing the number of homes and stated as if in a threatening way that if they can't build the 605 amount they would not move forward with the project or they would build apartments. Additionally, at one point they criticized some of our neighbor's existing homes as not being very nice or valuable when stating how their project will greatly improve our area. As to the traffic issues, their response that it will not be a problem because they had a study done and kept going back to that opinion despite input from those in attendance it's already a problem.” • The neighborhood meetings are addressed in Master Response 15. These meetings were held by the Project applicant and are not administered by the City.
The City has held a scoping meeting, and Planning Commission Hearing. A City Council hearing will also be held. There are no specific environmental concerns identified in the comment and no further response is warranted.
Response L-6-7: This comment states: “Many of us feel there is no honest effort to even try to address neighborhood concerns at these meetings which is one of the purposes for holding them.
If this project continues there must be neighborhood meetings that truly allow input and discussions, not a dictatorial presentation with pre-determined plans like the last one.” • The neighborhood meetings are addressed in Master Response 15. These meetings were held by the Project applicant and are not administered by the City.
The City has held a scoping meeting, and Planning Commission Hearing. A City Council hearing will also be held. There are no specific environmental concerns identified in the comment and no further response is warranted. 3596
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-136 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-7-1
3597
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-137 L-7-2
3598
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-138 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-7-2
3599
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-139 L-7-2
3600
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-140 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-7-2
3601
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-141 Response to Letter L-7: Jacqueline Ruiz, Resident of Clovis Response L-7-1: The commenter indicates that they have “included a pdf of images that I would like to use tonight at the City Planning Commission Meeting…If these images are not able to be projected, I would like to include copies of them for the Planning Commission if possible…All images in the pdf are to be used in reference to Agenda Item 3, for the City of Clovis Planning Commission meeting on 11/16/2023.”
• There are no specific environmental concerns identified in the comment, rather, the email serves as a transmission of images that the commenter desired to have available during the Planning Commission hearing. The images were available during the Planning Commission hearing. The images are noted and will be presented to the City for consideration. This comment does not require any further response.
Response L-7-2: This comment includes the attached pdf images that the commenter referred to in the first comment.
• The comment cites a study comparing crime in Philadelphia, PA and Louisville, KY.
It is notable that the two cities in the study are generally high crime communities from the Midwest and East Coast, whereas the City of Clovis is a low crime community within the California. There are many significantly different community characteristics between Clovis and the other communities referenced in the study. Nevertheless, “crime” is not an environmental topic under the California Environmental Quality Act. Instead, “Public Services,” including police and park services, are CEQA topics. However, the focus of CEQA as it relates to these Public Services, is not the physical facilities (i.e. police station or parks), the construction of which would cause a physical environmental impact. The DEIR concludes the Project would not result in any significant impact on police resources, nor would it result in the need to build new or expanded police facilities to serve the proposed Project. The DEIR also addresses the physical impacts that are associated with the construction of new parks within the Project site. It is noted, that the images served as a slide presented by the commenter during the Planning Commission hearing. The images were considered at the Planning Commission and be considered at future hearings of the City Council.
This comment does not require any further response.
3602
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-142 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1
3603
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-143 L-8-1 Cont
3604
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-144 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1 Cont
3605
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-145 L-8-1 Cont
3606
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-146 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1 Cont
3607
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-147 L-8-1 Cont
3608
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-148 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1 Cont
3609
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-149 L-8-1 Cont
3610
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-150 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1 Cont
3611
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-151 L-8-1 Cont
3612
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-152 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-8-1 Cont
3613
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-153 Response to Letter L-8: Peter Menagh, Resident of Clovis Response L-8-1: This comment states the following:
“My name is Patrick Menagh and I am a resident of Quail Run – 9459 N. Purdue Ave, Clovis, CA 93619. I plan on using this opportunity to speak during the public comment period and was informed we could supply you with pictures that I can use when I speak. Please have the attached pictures available so I can use them. There are 16, but I assure you I will be brief with each one and remain within my allotted time.” • This comment is noted. The pictures provided were made available at the Planning Commission hearing. The commenter subsequently provided oral comment regarding these pictures at the November 16, 2023 Planning Commission hearing. The commenter’s Planning Commission comments are summarized below:
The commenter provided a video showing roadways captured from a car drive, and provided commentary. Staff was not able to accommodate the video during the hearing, but did provide the pictures. Commenter indicated that he now knows that the project entry near the corner of Perrin and Stanford will be gated.
He noted that the Perrin and Stanford intersection gets ‘really windy’ and that there were no sidewalks. Commenter provided pictures to illustrate this comment. Commenter noted that there will be a lot of people living in the new community who will have children going to Clovis North. Commenter showed map route that his phone directed him to take, he described that route and the alternative route. Commenter noted that he tried Waves (a mapping App), and it had the same primary route so that was believed to be the best route. Heading out from his house, the intersection of Purdue and Perrin has no street lines, no sidewalks, no stop sign. The corner where the emergency only fire access road/gate will be (corner of Perrin and Stanford) is blind on the left, no lines, no sidewalks. Commenter notes that it is more than a 90-degree turn, suggested that it was more like 100 degrees. Coming right off that turn, there are no lines or sidewalks, neighbor on right paved an area to keep people from driving in that area and losing control. The commenter showed images heading towards the bend and on right side of road, sees oncoming car with not a lot of space for it go by. Commenter noted that he was doing about 10mph, with the oncoming car doing about 35mph and it almost hit him. Commenter noted that people drive fast through the area because of construction, and he is already seeing that problem exist. The next slide is Solar and Stanford, which has no stop sign, coming in to a T out of that cul de sac. Next slide is next bend, commenter notes that it is blind, no lines, no curbs; people walking this all the time, his wife walks it every day, will tell him once a week about almost getting hit. Commenter indicates that if you put an exit in that location, with a hundred homes, gated, they will go out on Shepherd, on Sunnyside, but if they have got an exit, it is 3614
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-154 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North common sense, path of least resistance. Commenter indicates that the road is not built for speed but they are going to speed because they are going to be late.
The curve at Stanford and Ticonderoga – blind, hedge on right cannot see cars coming around the corner and they cut the corner every time. There are no lines and they are swinging around there like a racetrack. Commenter indicates that it is going to get worse; you are going to have people get hit, going to have somebody hurt, going to have wrecks. God forbid you hurt somebody, especially after we have stood up here and told you it is a problem. The next slide shows Ticonderoga and Fowler, garbage truck hauling across Fowler doing about 45, that intersection does not have a stop sign on Fowler. Commenter notes that there was a wreck on Fowler on October 16th, car hit the telephone pole, cannot see it in picture but to the right. Commenter notes that about a month earlier another wreck occurred. Ever since there has been construction there have been more problems, because people coming in and out of the neighborhood, just with the construction. You get a hundred homes, with people going to school, because that is going to be the best way, you are going to have wrecks. We are already seeing it, look it up; it just happened last month. I have got pictures on my phone. You are going to have backups because if you have ever been on it about 7:30, 8 o’clock, it is a zoo, then you do the same thing about 4:30, 5:30; it is a zoo trying to get down Fowler. Commenter indicates that it is a problem, we are talking about lives, we are talking about our neighborhood. We want a nice, quiet neighborhood, we want it the way we had it in the past. I am not saying that we cannot develop, but you got to use your brains, got to be reasonable.
There is a problem here, and there has got to be a better way to get traffic through here because it is going to be a problem. The next slide is another look at where that exit is coming the other way, blind on the right. The next slide, where Sunnyside and Perrin meet, blind on the left and right both, no stop sign and that’s Sunnyside. The next slide, example of new road built by Lennar; road on right looks like they gave up and just decided to make it narrow, go back to narrow roads already there. Gives you an idea of difference between nice wide road and our narrow roads. Next slide, cul de sac talking about, Lennar on right, Wilson on left; it is tight, if you have not driven it go try. Cones everywhere but it is tight. Going to be fun when you have all those people coming out of there.
Please take time to drive it, try it, before making a decision. You are going to go ‘wait, this is kind of crazy.’ So, to summarize, heard a lot of things about different kinds of impacts, there’s impact, we live there every day. Can find an expert to say anything, happens all the time in the courtroom, one side has expert saying this, other side has expert saying that. Think common sense would dictate talk to people who live there. Not against the project, just against it not being done right or safe. Lower the density, does not make sense. Can find middle ground here. Think about water issue, we are willing to work with you. We are willing to find some middle ground that will work for the City, the developer, and for the community, because there are issues.
3615
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-155 The primary concerns expressed were the potential traffic related impacts from the proposed Project at the egress location at Perrin and Stanford Avenue, as well as the overall circulation and traffic conditions throughout the vicinity. It should be noted, that City Planning Staff has met with the Fire Department and agreed upon a compromise to make the northern access an EVA only, resulting in no Project traffic impacting the Perrin/Stanford area. The traffic analysis shows that there are no significant impacts related to traffic safety.
3616
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-156 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-9-1
L-9-2
L-9-3
L-9-4
3617
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-157 L-9-4 Cont’d
L-9-5
3618
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-158 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-9: Jared Callister, Resident of Clovis Response L-9-1: This comment is an introductory statement, and a request to provides their slides to be available at the Planning Commission hearing. The commenter notes that they may be late to the meeting, and that they have asked another member to read the letter on their behalf.
• This comment is noted. The slides were made available at the Planning Commission hearing. The letter was also read at the hearing. There is no further response warranted for this comment.
Response L-9-2: This comment is an introductory statement to a letter that was read at the Planning Commission. It identifies the commenter, their address, and hardships they have in attending the hearing based on prior obligations. The commenter indicates that they are a concerned member of the Quail Run 18 Association, which consists of 18 homeowners who “find themselves at the heart of the proposed Spensley property development.” The commenter indicates that the Association has entrusted the law firm Remy Moose & Manly to articulate their legal concerns, but they also feel it imperative to voice their specific issues and personal experiences. This comment concludes that they fully agree with the law firms’ comments that the EIR for the proposed Project is insufficient. • This comment is noted. The comments provided by their law firm are included as Comment L-5 by Nathan O. George of Remy Moose & Manly dated November 16, 2023. That comment letter is addressed in Response L-5 earlier in this document.
There are no other specific environmental concerns presented in this comment.
The commenter’s opposition to the proposed Project is noted and will be provided to the City for its consideration.
Response L-9-3: This commenter states “Let's be clear: this development will have a significant impact on neighboring communities. It defies common sense to argue otherwise. The magnitude of change and impact on our lives cannot be overstated. This is a case where common sense must prevail.”
• There is not a specific comment identified that relates to the environmental information provided in the EIR, rather, the comment presents their concerns relating to the impact on their lives from change if the proposed Project were built. The commenters concerns are noted and will be provided to the City for its consideration.
Response L-9-4: This comment states:
“This development process is rushed and hurried, lacking adequate evaluation of the complex challenges facing our community. It's important to note that this development, 3619
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-159 positioned in County Service Area 51, is an area with a history of water issues. Additionally, its proximity to the Dry Creek Preserve raises significant complicating factors.
While it may seem that this development has been “years” in the making, the reality is that the only item “years” in the making was the concept of a Sphere of Influence boundary change. Indeed, the actual tract map was only released with the Draft EIR just a few months ago.. The final EIR was issued just two weeks ago. This accelerated timeline is out of the ordinary and not in alignment with what we were led to expect.
For years, we were told by the City that this would be a multi-step process, allowing for community input at every stage: first the Sphere of Influence change, followed by annexation and proposed entitlements, and then, at a later stage a tract map. Instead, what we are witnessing is a rapid consolidation of these steps into a single action. This approach contradicts the very essence of proper planning.
The intent of a step-by-step process is to be deliberative, allowing all stakeholders to understand, contribute, and voice their concerns effectively. The current trajectory of this project, as proposed, is unacceptable without substantial revisions.” • The topics of water are addressed in the Draft EIR in Sections 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality, and 3.14 Utilities. These topics are also discussed in additional detail in Master Response 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The comment that indicating that the “development process is rushed and hurried, lacking adequate evaluation” is not an accurate understanding of the process that has transpired. The Draft EIR is a result of extensive technical analysis by a team of consultants working closely with City staff since 2021 (over two years). During that time, there was a significant amount of analysis, peer review, design changes, and supplemental analysis necessary to fully analyze the impacts, and reduce or avoid impacts associated with project development. This two-year time frame is inclusive of the environmental review process, but the planning and application process extends even farther back in time. The CEQA process involves the accumulation of numerous technical reports that are summarized in the DEIR. In effect, the CEQA document functions to synthesize numerous technical analyses into a single document that can be distributed out to the public for review for a more simplified review of the technical analyses. City staff has thoroughly examined the details of the application, including the design and the environmental impacts, and will ultimately present their findings to the City Council for its consideration.
Response L-9-5: This comment is a conclusion to the letter, urging the Planning Commission to vote no on this project and to put this project on hold. The commenter states “In reality, the Developer needs to go back to the drawing board and actually present a tract map that 3620
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-160 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North takes into consideration the input from the community. There is a need for genuine engagement with the community members. We ask for a reconsideration and revision of the tract map to reflect the concerns and inputs of all stakeholders.” • The concerns and recommendation provided in the comment are noted and will be provided to the City for consideration.
3621
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-161 L-10-1
3622
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-162 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3623
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-163 L-10-2
3624
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-164 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3625
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-165 L-10-2
3626
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-166 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3627
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-167 L-10-2
3628
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-168 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3629
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-169 L-10-2
3630
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-170 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3631
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-171 L-10-2
3632
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-172 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3633
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-173 L-10-2
3634
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-174 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-2
3635
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-175 L-10-2
3636
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-176 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-3
3637
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-177 L-10-4
3638
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-178 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-10-4
3639
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-179 L-10-4
3640
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-180 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-10: Laurence Kimura, P.E., Fresno Irrigation District Response L-10-1: This comment is an introductory email, which included a series of attachments including the commenter’s comments regarding the Final EIR and Findings of Facts & Statement of Overriding Considerations. The commenter notes that they previously reviewed and commented on the proposed project on August 1, 2023, and June 7, 2022 and that those comments still apply.
• This comment is noted. There are not environmental concerns identified in the comment and no further response is warranted.
Response L-10-2: This comment is a letter summarizing their understanding of the project and indicating that their agency previously reviewed and commented on the proposed project on August 1, 2023, and June 7, 2022 and that those comments still apply. • This comment is noted. There are not environmental concerns identified in the comment and no further response is warranted. It is noted that the August 1, 2023 letter from the commenter is formally addressed in the Final EIR under Response A.
Response L-10-3: This comment is a letter is a previously submitted comment letter from August 1, 2023. • The August 1, 2023 letter from the commenter is formally addressed in the Final EIR under Response A.
Response L-10-4: This comment is a letter of a previously submitted comment letter from June 7, 2022. • The June 7, 2022 letter from the commenter is included in the Appendix to the Draft EIR, and the comments are addressed in the text of the EIR. 3641
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-181 L-11-1
3642
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-182 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-11: Lewis Smith, Resident of Clovis Response L-11-1: This comment provides an introduction, presents concerns about access and the lack of roadway striping, sidewalks, curb/gutter, and lighting. The comment also suggests that there will be a dangerous condition that is not acceptable. The commenter offers a compromise solution to eliminate the northern access point, and instead make it an emergency vehicle access only.
• This comment is noted. City Planning staff has met with the Fire Department and agreed upon a compromise to make the northern access an EVA only, resulting in no Project traffic impacting the Perrin/Stanford area.
3643
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-183 L-12-1
3644
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-184 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-12: Patrick Quigley, Resident of Clovis Response L-12-1: This comment indicates that the surrounding rural roads cannot support the traffic that will be generated.
• This comment is addressed in Master Responses 7 through 13. 3645
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-185 L-13-1
L-13-2
3646
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-186 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-13: Marcus DiBuduo, Resident of Clovis Response L-13-1: This comment indicates that the commenter is “a bit confused on when comments to the planning commission need to be received to not be considered late.” The commenter indicates that the “website says by 4 pm of the day of the meeting, but you referenced a municipal code that apparently says otherwise. Just want to make sure that in the future I get comments in on time.”
• The commenter is correct that the Clovis Municipal Code section 9.96.010 [Timely Public Comments.] addresses time public comments and specifically indicates that “in order to provide proper consideration of public comments, any written comments should be submitted not less than five (5) calendar days before the scheduled public hearing.” However, the City staff provides a statement on Planning Commission agendas that “If a written comment is received after 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting, efforts will be made to provide the comment to the Planning Commission during the meeting. However, staff cannot guarantee that written comments received after 4:00 p.m. will be provided to the Planning Commission during the meeting. All written comments received prior to the end of the meeting will be made part of the record of proceedings.” While this may appear to be a discrepancy, it is consistent with the Clovis Municipal Code section
9.96.010 [Timely Public Comments.] which indicates that “Written comments and documents submitted after that time…including comments and documents submitted the day of the public hearing, will be considered at the discretion of the reviewing body. If considered, the late comments, including any response thereto, shall be given the weight they are due.” What this means is that comments received submitted not less than five (5) calendar days before the scheduled public hearing will be fully considered, and for those comments that are received after that, the City will attempt to respond, but not guarantee a response or consideration by the reviewing body. The text of Clovis Municipal Code section
9.96.010 [Timely Public Comments.] is provided below:
o Comments from the public and interested agencies on discretionary land use entitlements are welcome and strongly encouraged. In order to provide proper consideration of public comments, any written comments should be submitted not less than five (5) calendar days before the scheduled public hearing. Written comments and documents submitted after that time, unless also within the noticed public review period, including comments and documents submitted the day of the public hearing, will be considered at the discretion of the reviewing body. If considered, the late comments, including any response thereto, shall be 3647
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-187 given the weight they are due. Factors to consider in evaluating whether and how to respond to late comments include, but are not limited to:
▪ A. Time period provided for public review.
▪ B. Accuracy of public hearing notice.
▪ C. Level of detail in comments.
▪ D. Explanation of relevance of comments and documents. ▪ E. Reasons for failing to comment earlier.
Despite this, to date the City here has responded to all written comments provided to the City, regardless of whether they are timely under the Clovis Municipal Code.
Response L-13-2: This comment indicates that the commenter is “it seems like traffic is the hot topic. Has the city considered offering a public explanatory meeting of the EIR findings on this subject? At least I would be interested in discussing with you and Sean the impact on Sunnyside south of Shepherd. Frankly I’m perplexed how the EIR said there were no impacts to Sunnyside that needed to be mitigated. Maybe it’s because the VMT model - while perhaps legally sufficient for EIR purposes - fails to consider the unique characteristics of that roadway segment.”
• The traffic analysis in the EIR bases its impact conclusion on the VMT impacts of the proposed Project in alignment with the requirements of SB743. However, the City has also performed a supplemental analysis of traffic operations outside of the requirements for CEQA, to appropriately plan and engineer the roadway system. The traffic operations analysis follows standards for levels of service and is intended to inform as to when and where traffic improvements are necessary based on capacity and anticipated congestion on roadways. It should be noted that the traffic operations analysis is not intended to be used as supporting evidence in any CEQA impact conclusion, as such conclusions are prohibited under the requirements specified in SB 743. Instead, the traffic operations analysis helps guide transportation improvement planning in the near and long term, and it helps guide capital improvement planning and financing.
The traffic operations analysis for the proposed Project shows that the modeled traffic on Sunnyside in year 2046 with the addition of the proposed Project (i.e.
Cumulative +Project Conditions) needs to increase by double before going from LOS C to the low range of LOS D. In other words, the traffic levels would need to more than double from existing conditions before it would degrade to an unacceptable level of service. The roadway operates well within its existing volume capacity even though it has seen some increases over the years. 3648
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-188 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-14-1
3649
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-189 L-14-2
3650
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-190 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Response to Letter L-14: Lewis Smith, Resident of Clovis Response L-14-1: This comment is an introductory email presenting a letter attachment. The email expresses concern about the proposed exit planned on the northern portion of the Wilson Homes development.”
• The concerns expressed in the introductory email are reiterated in the letter attached to the email. See the following responses.
Response L-14-1: This comment is an introductory email presenting a letter attachment. The email expresses concern about the “proposed northern exit planned onto Perrin Ave.” The commenter states “It was also clear that the City of Clovis Planning Dept only cares that the access point is available to emergency vehicles only. The lone entity that wants this northern exit open to all vehicles is the fire dept. However, this exit, if approved, will create a serious public safety issue for the neighborhood north of the development, particularly on Perrin Ave, Stanford Ave, and Ticonderoga Ave. The term "public safety issue" means motor vehicle accidents, vehicles vs. pedestrians, vehicles vs bicyclists and vehicles vs. animals.” The letter continues by stating “It's noteworthy that if a car coming from this new neighborhood hits someone on Stanford Ave and 911 is called, the City of Clovis Fire Dept is not going to respond as it is not in the City of Clovis jurisdiction. It would be Cal Fire (Fresno County) responding. Therefore, it is extremely concerning that the City of Clovis Fire Dept is pushing for this exit, which will create a danger to citizens in an area they are not responsible for protecting.
• The concerns expressed in the comment letter are partially addressed in Master Response 12, which indicates that the project will have three separate public access points, and one access point that is for emergency access only (Perrin Road), such that in the case of any fire related events, Firefighters can access the project through multiple access points around the project site. The Fire Department evaluates neighborhood roadway designs to ensure that there is adequate access for emergency vehicles. They have evaluated the proposed Project and determined that the access points, including the emergency access point on Perrin/Stanford, in the proposed Project are adequate for the provision of emergency services. More specifically, the northern Perrin/Stanford Road access will be an emergency access only, and will not allow vehicles to exit or enter the development. The access point on Perrin/Stanford is a modification to this access based on public comment and further review by the Clovis Fire Department. It was determined that this could be an emergency access only. The modification of Perrin to an emergency only access will redistribute the limited number of trips to the three other project accesses. The additional trips will not 3651
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-191 create a substantial increase to the project accesses and there will not be a need for additional analysis.
The comment that the City of Clovis Fire Department is not going to respond to calls on Stanford is not accurate. The City of Clovis Fire Department has mutual aid agreements with other fire departments in the County and neighboring jurisdictions, and when called upon to serve they respond to the call even if it falls outside the jurisdictional boundaries of the City. The decisions to respond are based on 911 dispatchers and not on the Clovis Fire Department. 3652
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-192 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-15-1
3653
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-193 Response to Letter L-15: Chuck Kallas, Resident of Clovis Response L-15-1: This comment expresses the commenter opposition to the project. Environmental concerns identified in the letter include overpopulation and growth, unsustainable and unreliable water demand and drought.
• Concerns regarding unsustainable and unreliable water demand and drought are addressed in the Master Response 3, 4, and 5. Master Response 14 addresses population, population density, and orderly growth associated with annexation and SOI Expansion. Additionally, Chapter 3.10 Land Use, Population, and Housing addresses population and growth. This comment is noted, and the concerns will be presented to the City for consideration. This comment does not require any further response.
3654
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0-194 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North L-16-1
3655
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED
AFTER FEIR PUBLIC CIRCULATION
3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3.0-195 Response to Letter L-16: Robert Shuman, Resident of Clovis Response L-16-1: This comment provides an introduction, presents concerns about access and the lack of roadway striping, sidewalks, curb/gutter, and lighting. The comment also suggests that there will be a dangerous condition that is not acceptable. The commenter provides several examples of safety issues that have occurred in the past. The commenter offers a compromise solution to eliminate the northern access point, and instead make it an emergency vehicle access only. Lastly, the commenter requests that place single story homes on the northern property line.
• This comment is noted. The City Planning staff has met with the Fire Department and agreed upon a compromise to make the northern access an EVA only, resulting in no Project traffic impacting the Perrin/Stanford area.
It is noted that the project is not proposed as a pre-plotted subdivision that identifies specific housing architecture or floor plans on each lot. For example, the City does not have any knowledge of whether a one- or two-story residence would be built backing up to the commenter’s residence. The zoning code dictates the development standards for zones throughout the City, and it will dictate the standards that apply to the proposed subdivision. One- and two-story residences are allowed up to the height limits defined in the zone. The concept of limiting the height of homes backing up to the commenter’s residence can be presented as a concept for the Applicant to consider, but City’s zoning code does not restrict the height to a one story. This concern does not present an environmental impact pursuant to CEQA. Nevertheless, this comment will be provided to the City for consideration.
3656
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-1 This chapter includes minor edits to the EIR. These modifications resulted from responses to comments received during the Draft EIR public review period, as well as additional comments that were received leading up to the Planning Commission Hearing as well as some received after that hearing. The Errata revisions provided here are intended to supersede those provided in the Final EIR that was publicly circulated prior to the Planning Commission hearing.
Revisions herein do not result in new significant environmental impacts, do not constitute significant new information, and do not alter the conclusions of the environmental analysis that would warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. Changes are provided in revision marks with underline for new text and strike out for deleted text.
4.1 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following edits are made to pages ES-17 in the Executive Summary of the DEIR.
NOISE
Impact 3.11-1: Operational
Noise- The proposed Project has
the potential to generate a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the
Project in excess of standards
established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies.
PS Mitigation Measure 3.11-1: A 6-foot-tall barrier shall be constructed along the south boundary of the Project site, adjacent to Sunnyside Avenue and Shepherd Avenue (along all unshielded residential private yards within 100 ft of the centerline of Sunnyside and Shepherd Avenues), in order to achieve the City’s exterior noise standards. Noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concrete panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials that achieve the required total height. Wood is not recommended due to eventual warping and degradation of
acoustical performance. These walls must be at least 4.2 lbs/ft. These requirements shall be included in the
improvements plans prior to their approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
LS
Impact 3.11-2: Construction
Noise- The proposed Project has
the potential to generate a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the
Project in excess of standards
established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies.
PS Mitigation Measure 3.11-3: Construction activities shall adhere to the requirements of the City of Clovis Municipal Code with respect to hours of operation. This requirement shall be noted in the improvements plans prior to approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
As soon as practicable (after grading operations), install permanent fencing along the boundary of the area being
Developed and the adjacent Non-Development Area.
Fencing should be a minimum of 6 feet tall and continuous between the source of noise and adjacent residences.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: The contractor shall ensure that the following noise attenuating strategies are implemented during project construction:
LS
3657
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-2 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North • During construction, the contractor shall ensure
mufflers are properly installed on all construction
equipment capable of being outfitted with
mufflersis equipped with appropriate noise
attenuating devices.
• Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in
use.
• Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles
and their loads are secured from rattling and
banging.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
No changes were made to Chapter 1.0 of the DEIR.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following edits are made to pages 2.0-3 through 2.0-4 in Section 2.0 of the DEIR.
2.4 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
A clear statement of objectives and the underlying purpose of the proposed Project are discussed per CEQA Guidelines Section 151024(b).
PR O J E C T OB J E C T I V E S
The project objectives include a collection of goals and objectives, which clearly define the purpose of the Project. In developing the project objectives, it is notable that the City considered the Legislature’s repeated determinations in recent years that California is facing a statewide housing crisis, and it is clearly within a city’s exercise of its legislative discretion to facilitate the construction of new housing, which is defined by the Project Description after thorough evaluation of the development potential. Government Code section 65889.5, subdivision (a)(1)(A), states that “[t]he lack of housing, including emergency shelters, is a critical problem that threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.” Subdivision (a)(1)(D) of that section adds that “[m]any local governments do not give adequate attention to the economic, environmental, and social costs of decisions that result in disapproval of housing development projects, reduction in density of housing projects, and excessive standards for housing development projects.” The principal Project objective is the expansion of the City’s SOI to include the Project site, and the annexation/reorganization, approval and subsequent development of the Development Area.
The quantifiable objectives include the development of up to 605 single-family residential units. The quantifiable objectives include the development of open space totaling approximately 5.54 acres, including 2.25 acres of trails, 2.39 acres of promenade/pedestrian circulation, and 0.90 acres of parks.
The Project objectives also include the installation of new public and private roadways that will provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Project site and surrounding community areas, and other improvements, including water supply, storm drainage, sewer facilities and landscaping to serve the residential uses.
3658
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-3 The City has established five additional objectives project goals and objectives goals of the proposed development that more fully inform the Project purpose. These project goals and objectives are as follows:
• Provide residential housing opportunities that are visually attractive and accommodate the future housing demand in Clovis, consistent with policies stated in A Landscape of Choice to modestly increase urban density.
• Establish a mixture of housing types, sizes and densities that collectively provide for local and regional housing demand, consistent with City requirements as stated in the latest Regional Housing Needs Analysis (RHNA).
• Provide infrastructure that meets City standards and is integrated with existing and planned facilities and connections.
• Establish a logical phasing plan designed to ensure that each phase of development would include necessary public improvements required to meet City standards. • Expand the City’s Sphere of Influence in order to establish a logical and orderly boundary that promotes the efficient extension of municipal services.
The Project goals and objectives presented above, were developed by the City in response to the Legislature’s repeated determinations in recent years that California is facing a statewide housing crisis, and the City’s desire to facilitate the construction of new housing in the face of the housing crisis. The City staff has responded with adequate attention to the economic, environmental, and social costs of reduced housing density by establishing a quantified target density that provided the City with significant flexibility to evaluate different scenarios for residential projects on the Project site.
3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
The following edits are made to pages 3.1-3 through 3.1-4 in Section 3.1 of the DEIR.
LI G H T A N D GL A R E
During the day, sunlight reflecting from structures is a primary source of glare, while nighttime light and glare can be divided into both stationary and mobile sources. Stationary sources of nighttime light include structure illumination, interior lighting, decorative landscape lighting, and street lights.
The principal mobile source of nighttime light and glare is vehicle headlamp illumination. This ambient light environment can be accentuated during periods of low clouds or fog.
The variety of urban developed and inhabited land uses in the City of Clovis are the main source of daytime and nighttime light and glare. They are typified by single and multi-family residences, commercial structures, industrial areas, and street lights. These areas and their associated human activities (inclusive of vehicular traffic) characterize the existing light and glare environment present during daytime and nighttime hours in the urbanized portions of the City. Sources of light and glare in the City of Clovis include building (interior and exterior), security, sign illumination, and parkingarea lighting. Other sources of nighttime light and glare include street lights and vehicular traffic along surrounding roadways. Additionally, The the General Plan EIR (page 5.1-10) notes that there is a significant amount of ambient lighting that comes from surrounding communities and roadways. 3659
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-4 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Because the City of Clovis is adjacent to highly urbanized portions of the City of Fresno to the west and south, ambient light in the community is substantially impacted by land uses in Fresno. Large, light-intensive institutions and facilities near the City’s boundary include Fresno Yosemite International Airport and CSU Fresno. Nevertheless, areas within the City Limits and SOI, which account for nearly half of the entire Planning Area of the City of Clovis, are mainly rural residential and agricultural land and have very few sources of light and glare, allowing for clear day and nighttime views. This is the case of the Project site given that it is in the northern portion of Clovis, which is distant from the more urban developed and densely populated areas of downtown Fresno and Clovis.
The Development Area is characterized as undeveloped agricultural land, and the Non-development Area is characterized as developed rural residential land. Areas immediately surrounding the Project site include rural residential to the north and east, and suburban to the south and west. Surrounding lands are characterized further below.
Sources of glare in urbanized developed portions of the City come from light reflecting off surfaces, including glass, and certain siding and paving materials, as well as metal roofing. The urbanized developed suburban areas of Clovis contain street lights, sidewalks, and paved parking areas, which reflect street and vehicle lights. The developed rural residential areas of Clovis (including unincorporated County) generally do not contain street lights or sidewalks, but typically have dirt or gravel parking areas on the property frontage with reflective properties.
The existing light environment found in the vicinity of the Project site is considered typical of both suburban and rural residential areas. The existing suburban lighting exists along Shepherd Avenue immediately south of the Project site from just west of Fowler Avenue to approximately SR 168 (an approximately 3.2-mile suburban corridor). Additionally, existing suburban lighting exists along Shepherd Avenue immediately west of the Project site from Sunnyside Avenue to North Friant Road (an approximately 4.7-mile suburban corridor). In total, approximately 7.9 miles of roadway corridor along Shepherd Avenue south of the Project site is best characterized as suburban, and lighting is typical of suburban developed areas in this location.
To the north of Shepherd Avenue in the vicinity of the Project site is a mix of suburban and rural residential areas. Immediately to the west is suburban residential in the neighborhoods north of Shepherd Avenue (i.e. Lennar Heritage Grove). Immediately to the north and east of the Project site is rural residential development, which has a lower intensity of lighting then what is common in the suburban neighborhoods in the vicinity.
These rural residential areas have typical residential building lighting (i.e., lights on the building structure in the front and backyard, landscaping lighting, and indoor lighting) like the suburban neighborhoods, but there is a lower density of buildings so overall lighting intensity is lower in these areas when compared to the surrounding suburban lighting. Additionally, some of the rural residential areas do not have street lighting, unlike more intensively developed areas in the vicinity.
However, these areas are typical of suburban areas within and immediately outside the City of Clovis, where rural residential neighborhoods are often located adjacent to suburban or urban uses. The mix of lighting is typical of many suburban neighborhoods along the periphery of the City and within certain areas, such as the Dry Creek Preserve.
Sky glow is the effect created by light reflecting into the night sky. Sky glow is of particular concern in areas surrounding observatories, where darker night sky conditions are necessary, but is also of concern in more rural or natural areas where a darker night sky is either the norm or is important to wildlife. Developed areas have existing light sources that illuminate the night sky. In other words, sky 3660
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-5 glow is considered part of the existing conditions (i.e., the baseline conditions under CEQA). Due to the urban nature of the City limits, a number of existing light sources affect residential areas and illuminate the night sky. Isolating impacts of particular sources of light or glare is therefore not appropriate or feasible for the proposed Project. Sky glow can increase significantly based on certain intensive uses—such as a project that contemplates stadium lights, spotlights, and strobe lights.
The following edits are made to pages 3.1-15 through 3.1-18 in Section 3.1 of the DEIR.
Impact 3.1-3: Project implementation may result in light and glare impacts. (Less than Significant)
During the day, sunlight reflecting from structures is a primary source of glare, while nighttime light and glare can be divided into both stationary and mobile sources. Some types of stationary sources of nighttime light include structure illumination, interior lighting, decorative landscape lighting, and street lights. The principal mobile source of nighttime light and glare is vehicle headlamp illumination.
The developed and inhabited land uses in the City of Clovis are the main source of daytime and nighttime light and glare. They are typified by single and multi-family residences, commercial structures, industrial areas, and street lights. These areas and their associated human activities (inclusive of vehicular traffic) characterize the existing light and glare environment present during daytime and nighttime hours in the urbanized portions of the City.
The General Plan EIR (page 5.1-10) notes that there is a significant amount of ambient lighting that comes from surrounding communities and roadways. Because the City of Clovis is adjacent to highly urbanized portions of the City of Fresno to the west and south, ambient light in the community is substantially affected by land uses in Fresno. Large, light-intensive institutions and facilities near the City’s boundary include Fresno Yosemite International Airport and CSU Fresno. Nevertheless, areas within the City Limits and SOI, which account for nearly half of the entire Planning Area of the City of Clovis, include rural residential and agricultural land and have very few sources of light and glare, allowing for clear day and nighttime views. The other half of the entire Planning Area of the City of Clovis is more densely developed, consisting of single and multi-family residences, commercial structures, industrial areas, and street lights typical of suburban communities.
The Project site is in the northern portion of Clovis, which is distant from the more developed and densely populated areas of downtown Fresno and Clovis, and is best characterized as a mix of suburban, and rural residential. The Development Area is best characterized as undeveloped agricultural land, and the Non-development Area is characterized as developed rural residential land.
Areas immediately surrounding the Project site include rural residential to the north and east, and suburban to the south and west.
As noted in Impact 3.1-1, the proposed Project involves the development of up to 605 single-family residential units, open space totaling approximately 5.54 acres, including 2.25 acres of trails, 2.39 acres of promenade/pedestrian circulation, and 0.90 acres of parks, and associated roadway improvements. The existing light environment found in the vicinity of the Project site is considered typical of both suburban and rural residential areas. Existing suburban lighting exists along Shepherd Avenue immediately south of the Project site from just west of Fowler Avenue to approximately SR 168 (an approximately 3.2-mile suburban corridor). Existing suburban lighting also exists along Shepherd Avenue immediately west of the Project site from Sunnyside Avenue to North Friant Road (an approximately 4.7-mile suburban corridor). In total, approximately 7.9 miles of roadway corridor 3661
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-6 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North along Shepherd Avenue south of the Project site is best characterized as suburban, and lighting is typical of suburban developed areas.
To the north of Shepherd Avenue in the vicinity of the Project site is a mix of suburban and rural residential areas. Immediately to the west is suburban residential in the neighborhoods north of Shepherd Avenue (i.e. Lennar Heritage Grove). Immediately to the north and east of the Project site is rural residential development, which has a lower intensity of lighting then what is common in the suburban neighborhoods in the vicinity.
These rural residential areas have typical residential building lighting (i.e., lights on the building structure in the front and backyard, landscaping lighting, and indoor lighting) like the suburban neighborhoods, but there is a lower density of buildings so overall lighting intensity is lower in these areas when compared to the surrounding suburban lighting. Additionally, some of the rural residential areas do not have street lighting, unlike more intensively developed areas in the vicinity.
However, these areas are typical of suburban areas within and immediately outside the City of Clovis, where rural residential neighborhoods are often located adjacent to suburban or urban uses. The mix of lighting is typical of many suburban neighborhoods along the periphery of the City and within certain areas, such as the Dry Creek Preserve.
The Project is located within a largely developed area of Fresno County, and surrounded by developed land uses, a number of existing light sources already affect residential areas and illuminate the night sky. In other words, sky glow is present under existing conditions, and the introduction of a residential development adjacent to those existing developments would not result in a significant increase in sky glow. While sky glow can increase based on certain intensive uses—such as a project that contemplates stadium lights, spotlights, and strobe lights—no such intensive uses are contemplated for the Project. As a result, any increase in sky glow resulting from this Project would be imperceptible compared to baseline conditions and thus impossible to measure. The Project would therefore not result in new or substantially increased sky glow. In other words, sky glow is considered part of the existing conditions (i.e., the baseline conditions under CEQA).
The proposed Project also does not have any areas where there would be spillover of light, or high intensity or excessively bright lights. There would be normal City standard street lights that include standard shields to direct lighting to the roadway rights-of-way, without spilling over onto adjacent properties. This new light would not be a potentially significant impact. The new lighting expected would consist of lights on the building structure in the front and backyard, landscaping lighting, and indoor lighting. Although there would be new lighting associated with the residential buildings, the lighting attached to the building structures would be normal residential lighting subject to the City’s standards. The implementation of these lighting standards are part of the Project’s design and would avoid nuisance light and spillover issues.
Some buildings within the Project would be two-story, and it is therefore possible that lighting from the second story windows could be visible from adjacent properties; however, such second story indoor lighting would not be directed at, or to, the adjacent properties, and would not have a potentially significant impact on those adjacent properties. Additionally, the proposed Project does not include any lights that are considered excessively bright with the potential to create sky glow, such as stadium lights, strobe lights, spotlights, etc. In addition, there are no sources of significant glare associated with the proposed Project.
3662
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-7 New sources of glare from the proposed Project would occur primarily from the windshields of vehicles travelling to and from the Development Area and from vehicles parked within the Project site. However, parking for the proposed residential uses in the Development Area would primarily occur within enclosed garages and driveways. Headlights and windshields would be shielded by the proposed residential structures within the site. Additionally, the Project includes plans for extensive landscaping and open space areas throughout the site, which would provide visual screening and block potential windshield glare for sensitive receptors within the Project site. Residential structures placed along the boundaries of the Development Area would provide visual screening and block potential windshield glare to areas surrounding the Project site. Glare from traveling vehicles is a function of the density of vehicles on the roadway, the time that they are present, and the time of day. Generally, glare from traveling vehicles to a receptor is very short lived (fractions of a second) given that the glare is dependent on the amount of time in which the vehicle is positioned at the perfect angle for the sun to reflect light off the vehicle to a receptor. The potential for glare changes throughout the day as the angle of the sun changes. There is always some potential for glare reflecting off of traveling vehicles, but the City does not consider glare from vehicles traveling along roadways as a significant impact. The proposed Project is not anticipated to have high concentrations of glare, and the impact from glare is less than significant.
Additionally, several roadways would be constructed within the Development Area to serve the proposed single-family residential uses. These roadways would result in the introduction of street lighting into a currently undeveloped site. However, the proposed single-family residential uses and local roadway would be typical of what is already experienced as a result of the existing single-family residential uses and local roadways that occur within the surrounding area. The proposed singlefamily residential uses would be an extension of single-family residential uses adjacent to the Project site.
The proposed Project would be required to implement existing City regulations aimed at reducing light and glare impacts to ensure that no unusual daytime glare or nighttime lighting is produced.
Specifically, the Clovis Development Code states that direct glare shall not be permitted and provides standards for nuisance prevention and shielding requirements. Section 9.22.050 of the Clovis Development Code contains standards and provisions related to exterior lighting. While implementation of regulations and standards within the Clovis Development Code would reduce impacts associated with increased light and glare, the impacts would not be eliminated entirely, and the overall level of light and glare in the Project site would increase in general as urban development occurs.
Overall, the proposed Project would introduce new sources of daytime and nighttime lighting within the Project site that do not currently exist. However, it is noted there are no specific features within the proposed Project that would create unusual light and glare. Light sources from the proposed Project can have an adverse impact on the surrounding areas, by introducing nuisance light into the area and decreasing the visibility of nighttime skies. Additionally, light sources can create light spillover impacts on surrounding land uses in the absence of a lighting plan that includes photometrics of the lighting. The proposed Project, however, does not have any areas where there would be spillover of light, or high intensity or excessively bright lights. There would be normal City standard street lights that include standard shields to direct lighting to the roadway rights-of-way, without spilling over onto adjacent properties, or causing sky glow. This new light would not be a potentially significant impact.
3663
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-8 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North Any new lighting associated with implementation of the proposed Project would be pedestrian-scale lighting and the fixtures would be consistent with the style and technical specifications approved by the City, including compliance with the City’s light and glare regulations under Section 9.22.050 of the Clovis Development Code, which requires that light be shielded so that light does not spill onto adjacent properties. The City’s existing requirements require a lighting plan to be submitted to the City for review and approval for the improvement plans, as well as for the building plans. All proposed outdoor lighting is required to meet applicable City standards regulating outdoor lighting, including
9.22.050 Exterior light and glare of the City’s Development code, in order to minimize any impacts resulting from outdoor lighting on adjacent properties. Implementation of the existing City standards would reduce potential impacts associated with nighttime lighting and light spillage onto adjacent properties to a less than significant level.
3.2 AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES
The following edits are made to pages 3.2-9 through 3.2-10 in Section 3.2 of the DEIR.
Availability of Water Resources and Feasibility
For several years, the current property owner has been responsible for managing the former CalPecan orchard located on the Project site. In recent years, primarily due to drought conditions and expansion of new development surrounding the former Cal-Pecan orchard, the economically viabilitye of irrigated agricultural production has diminished. The Project site is located entirely north and east of the Enterprise Canal and therefore outside of the nearby Fresno Irrigation District boundary. It is therefore not eligible to receive deliveries of surface water from any irrigation district.
This is an entirely different situation from other properties located in the region, such as the nearby Heritage Grove growth area. A portion of Heritage Grove is located on the west side of the Enterprise Canal and continues to receive deliveries of surface water to support agricultural production. Recent SIGMA SGMA regulatory changes that now severely limit groundwater pumping has constrained the ability of any agricultural properties located outside of an irrigation district to support intensive agricultural uses that require regular and timely irrigation; further, groundwater pumping on this property has proven to be unpredictable and unreliable in recent years as available water from the aquifer under the Project site had been highly variable and provided an unreliable supply. The property owner has indicated that they made every effort to continue irrigating the trees throughout the drought conditions last summer, but the wells on the Project site went entirely dry and caused the pumps to burn out. The pecan trees suffered tremendous damage without available irrigation water and it resulted in large-scale tree mortality.
Additionally, as a result of the recent SIGMA SGMA regulatory changes, virtually all agricultural lending banks and institutions have recently changed their lending requirements to now demand availability of two sources of water (groundwater and surface water) as a condition for continued lending. The Project site cannot meet the new lending requirement because it is located outside of an irrigation district and is no longer eligible to obtain agricultural loans to support commercial agricultural operations.
The property owner also has noted that the soil substructure varies greatly on the Project site and is not accurately reflected in the more generic soil types documented in the Soil Survey for the region.
The property owner has indicated that the soils are not conducive to produce high agricultural yields because there is a cemented silty sand, clayey sand, and silty sand with clay, locally referred to as "hardpan" that is encountered below 2 feet across much of the Project site. This cementation retards 3664
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-9 the free percolation of surface water into the soil stratum below the hardpan, frequently resulting in a temporary perched water table condition at or near the ground surface during winter periods of precipitation. The perched water table can result in anerobic conditions in the root zone, which can result in root mortality and damage or death to the crop. This hardpan layer limits the types of crops that can be successful and is generally a variable that makes the property less economically viable for agricultural production.
The property owner has also indicated that the proximity of the Project site to existing urban development diminishes the economic viability of agricultural production. The property owner has indicated that there is increased vandalism, theft and harassment costs in recent years. The property owner cited last summer as particularly troublesome when neighbors would routinely shut-off irrigation pumps during the night and the valves in the orchard rows that are necessary to regulate pressure to operate the system were stolen. The property owner noted that equipment vandalism and theft occurred regularly and continued agricultural operations are now virtually impossible.
3.3 AIR QUALITY
No changes were made to Section 3.3 of the DEIR.
3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
No changes were made to Section 3.4 of the DEIR.
3.5 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL RESOURCES
No changes were made to Section 3.5 of the DEIR.
3.6 GEOLOGY
No changes were made to Section 3.6 of the DEIR.
3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY
No changes were made to Section 3.7 of the DEIR.
3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
No changes were made to Section 3.8 of the DEIR.
3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
No changes were made to Section 3.9 of the DEIR.
3.10 LAND USE PLANNING, POPULATION, AND HOUSING
The following edits are made to Section 3.10 of the DEIR starting on page 3.10-19. This text revision is intended to clarify that the mitigating features of the Project are presented in the text as Project Design Features, and not as “Mitigation Measure 3.13-1.” It is acknowledged that Mitigation Measure 3.13-1 does not exist in the Draft EIR. Additional text was also added to amplify the 3665
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-10 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North discussion regarding relevant CAPCOA measures incorporated into the Project to mitigate, or reduce, VMT. Also added, is a discussion of the EV measures that also are incorporated into the Project to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other local pollutant emissions.
AIR QUALITY ELEMENT
AIR-Policy 1.1: Land use and transportation.
Reduce greenhouse gas and other local
pollutant emissions through mixed use and
transit-oriented development and welldesigned transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems.
Consistent. As discussed previously, the Project includes well-designed pedestrian and bicycle systems. These
systems would help reduce mobile GHG emissions by
reducing vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT). Beyond the
proposed improvements, as required by Mitigation
Measure As described under Impact 3.13-1 in Section 3.13 of the Draft EIR, the applicant would be required to
implement Project Design Features that are proposed as
measures to help reduce VMT. These are discussed on page
3.13-19 under the heading “Project Design Features and
Mitigation Measures.” The VMT reduction from these
Project Design Features have been estimated using , which are identified in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) Draft Handbook for Analyzing GHG Emission Reductions, assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (GHG Handbook). Many of the strategies listed in this mitigation measure Project Design Features pertain to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems.
As shown on page 3.13-20, the Project Design features are in alignment with CAPCOA transportation measure T-18:
Provide Pedestrian Network Improvement, T-17: Improve
Street Connectivity, T-19A: Construct or Improve Bike
Facility. In addition, the Project Design Features include Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging capabilities. Collectively, these Project Design Features functionally serve to mitigate, or reduce the impact to the extent possible.
3.11 NOISE
The following edits are made to pages 3.11-16 through 3.11-17 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR.
TABLE 3.11-9: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT SCENARIO - NOISE LEVELS ALONG ROADWAYS (DBA CNEL)
ROADWAY SEGMENT
EXISTING EXISTING WITH PROJECT
CNEL @ 50' DBA CNEL @ 50' DBA CHANGE IN NOISE
LEVEL
Behymer
Avenue
Willow Avenue to
Minnewawa Avenue 60.4 60.5 0.1
Behymer
Avenue
Minnewawa Avenue to
Sunnyside Avenue 62.5 62.5 0.0
Behymer
Avenue
Sunnyside Avenue to
Fowler Avenue 62.4 62.4 0.0
Shepherd
Avenue
Willow Avenue to
Minnewawa Avenue 67.7 68.2 0.5
3666
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-11
ROADWAY SEGMENT
EXISTING EXISTING WITH PROJECT
CNEL @ 50' DBA CNEL @ 50' DBA CHANGE IN NOISE
LEVEL
Shepherd
Avenue
Minnewawa Avenue to
Clovis Avenue 67.3 68.2 0.9
Shepherd
Avenue
Clovis Avenue to
Sunnyside Avenue 66.6 68.2 1.6
Shepherd
Avenue
Sunnyside Avenue to
Project Intersection
Driveway (Fordham
Avenue) 3
65.1 66.8 1.7
Shepherd
Avenue
Project Intersection
Driveway (Fordham
Avenue) 3 to Fowler
Avenue
65.1 65.8 0.7
Herndon
Avenue
State Route 168
Eastbound Ramps to
Clovis Avenue
69.4 69.6 0.2
Willow Avenue Behymer Avenue to
Shepherd Avenue 72.4 72.5 0.1
Minnewawa
Avenue
Behymer Avenue to
Shepherd Avenue 63.5 63.5 0.0
Clovis Avenue Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 64.1 65.3 1.2
Clovis Avenue Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 66.3 66.9 0.6
Clovis Avenue Nees Avenue to Alluvial
Avenue 67.9 68.4 0.5
Clovis Avenue Alluvial Avenue to
Herndon Avenue 69.9 70.2 0.3
Sunnyside
Avenue
Project Intersection
Driveway 1 to Shepherd
Avenue
54.4 60.5 6.1
Sunnyside
Avenue
Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 60.3 61.6 1.3
Sunnyside
Avenue
Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 60.6 61.8 1.2
Fowler Avenue Behymer Avenue to
Ticonderoga 63.4 63.5 0.1
Fowler Avenue Ticonderoga to Shepherd
Avenue 64.4 64.4 0.0
Fowler Avenue Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 65.1 65.7 0.6
Fowler Avenue Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 65.1 65.7 0.6
Fowler Avenue Nees Avenue to State
Route 168 Westbound
Ramps
69.9 70.1 0.2
SOURCE: FHWA-RD-77-108 WITH INPUTS FROM MD ACOUSTICS. 2023. 3667
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-12 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North When comparing existing plus project levels to existing levels, Sunnyside Avenue from Project Intersection Driveway 1 to Shepherd Avenue has the potential for significant impact as the only roadway segment with an increase of more than 3 dB.
The following edits are made to pages 3.11-19 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR. Modified to provide clarification consistent with the findings in the draft EIR.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-1: A 6-foot-tall barrier shall be constructed along the south boundary of the Project site, adjacent to Sunnyside Avenue and Shepherd Avenue(along all unshielded residential private yards within 100 ft of the centerline of Sunnyside and Shepherd Avenues), in order to achieve the City’s exterior noise standards. Noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concrete panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials that achieve the required total height. Wood is not recommended due to eventual warping and degradation of acoustical performance. These walls must be at least 4.2 lbs/ft. These requirements shall be included in the improvements plans prior to their approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
The following edits are made to pages 3.11-20 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR. Modified to provide additional construction related requirements at the recommendation of a commenter.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-3: Construction activities shall adhere to the requirements of the City of Clovis Municipal Code with respect to hours of operation. This requirement shall be noted in the improvements plans prior to approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
As soon as practicable (after grading operations), install permanent fencing along the boundary of the area being Developed and the adjacent Non-Development Area. Fencing should be a minimum of 6 feet tall and continuous between the source of noise and adjacent residences.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: The contractor shall ensure that the following noise attenuating strategies are implemented during project construction:
• During construction, the contractor shall ensure mufflers are properly installed on all construction equipment capable of being outfitted with mufflersis equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices.
• Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. • Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging.
The following edits are made to pages 3.11-23 through 3.11-24 in Section 3.11 of the DEIR.
TABLE 3.11-10: 2046 SCENARIO - NOISE LEVELS ALONG ROADWAYS (DBA CNEL)
ROADWAY SEGMENT
EXISTING EXISTING WITH PROJECT
CNEL @ 50' DBA CNEL @ 50' DBA CHANGE IN NOISE
LEVEL
Behymer Avenue Willow Avenue to
Minnewawa Avenue 66.4 66.4 0.0
Behymer Avenue Minnewawa Avenue to
Sunnyside Avenue 67.0 67.0 0.0
Behymer Avenue Sunnyside Avenue to
Fowler Avenue 63.3 63.4 0.1
Shepherd Avenue Willow Avenue to
Minnewawa Avenue 71.9 72.1 0.2
3668
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-13
ROADWAY SEGMENT
EXISTING EXISTING WITH PROJECT
CNEL @ 50' DBA CNEL @ 50' DBA CHANGE IN NOISE
LEVEL
Shepherd Avenue Minnewawa Avenue to
Clovis Avenue 71.2 71.6 0.4
Shepherd Avenue Clovis Avenue to
Sunnyside Avenue 70.8 71.5 0.7
Shepherd Avenue Sunnyside Avenue to
Project Intersection
Driveway (Fordham
Avenue) 3
69.0 69.8 0.8
Shepherd Avenue Project Intersection
Driveway (Fordham
Avenue) 3 to Fowler
Avenue
69.0 69.3 0.3
Herndon Avenue State Route 168
Eastbound Ramps to
Clovis Avenue
70.5 70.6 0.1
Willow Avenue Behymer Avenue to
Shepherd Avenue 76.3 76.3 0.1
Minnewawa Avenue Behymer Avenue to
Shepherd Avenue 68.6 68.6 0.0
Clovis Avenue Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 69.9 70.2 0.3
Clovis Avenue Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 69.9 70.2 0.3
Clovis Avenue Nees Avenue to Alluvial
Avenue 70.9 71.1 0.3
Clovis Avenue Alluvial Avenue to
Herndon Avenue 71.8 72.1 0.2
Sunnyside Avenue Project Intersection
Driveway 1 to Shepherd
Avenue
68.7 69.2 0.5
Sunnyside Avenue Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 64.1 64.7 0.6
Sunnyside Avenue Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 63.9 64.5 0.6
Fowler Avenue Behymer Avenue to
Ticonderoga 64.3 64.3 0.0
Fowler Avenue Ticonderoga to Shepherd
Avenue 67.9 67.9 0.0
Fowler Avenue Shepherd Avenue to
Teague Avenue 68.4 68.7 0.3
Fowler Avenue Teague Avenue to Nees
Avenue 67.9 68.2 0.3
Fowler Avenue Nees Avenue to State
Route 168 Westbound
Ramps
71.4 71.6 0.1
SOURCE: FHWA-RD-77-108 WITH INPUTS FROM MD ACOUSTICS. 2023. 3669
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-14 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North As shown in Table 3.11-10, the Cumulative 2046 scenario has a maximum change in noise level of 0.7 dBA CNEL. Sunnyside Avenue from Project Intersection Driveway 1 to Shepherd Avenue has a 0.5 dBA CNEL change. Future residential uses will be in the normally compatible level along that segment.
Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur with regard to this impact.
3.12 PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION
No changes were made to Section 3.12 of the DEIR.
3.13 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
The following edits are made to pages 3.13-18 in Section 3.13 of the DEIR.
Impact 3.13-1: Project implementation would not result in VMT increases that are greater than 87 percent of Baseline conditions. (Significant and Unavoidable)
3.14 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The following edits are made to pages 3.14-31 through 3.14-33 in Section 3.14 of the DEIR.
EN V I R O N M E N T A L SE T T I N G
Stormwater throughout the City of Clovis is collected in Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District’s (FMFCD) basins. Unless the storm season is particularly wet, the collected stormwater is allowed to percolate into the soil as groundwater recharge. Additionally, the FMFCD allows the City to utilize 17 stormwater basins throughout the City’s Service Area for recharge purposes. (Provost & Pritchard, 2021B).
FMFCD covers the entire Fresno/Clovis Metropolitan Area and is authorized to control storm waters within an urban and rural foothill watershed of approximately 400 square miles, known as the Fresno County Stream Group. The FMFCD provides storm drainage through a system of inlets, drainage pipes, drainage ponds, and a system of dams and channels upstream. This system provides the primary means of urban storm drainage control for the City of Clovis and its sphere of influence. New storm drainage improvements are made by either development fees or by formation of assessment or improvement districts. The City of Clovis has a representative on the FMFCD Board. (City of Clovis, 2014).
On September 16, 1994, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) issued the first municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit No. CA0083500 to the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (District) and four other Co-Permittees, including the City of Clovis. The Regional Water Board renewed the permit on May 31, 2013 (Order No. R5-2013-0080). (FMFCD, 2020).
The FMFCD operates and maintains all master plan improvements, including the retention basins.
The City is responsible for operation and maintenance of all temporary facilities where master plan improvements are not complete. The City is also responsible for all surface flooding in streets and other areas where storm water cannot reach inlets and pipes quickly enough. Storm drainage collection facilities are designed for two-year storm capacityfrequency. Storm drain retention basins are designed for 50-year storm frequencycapacity. Development impact fees finance acquisition and 3670
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-15 construction of ponding basins. Storm drainage improvement districts fund development of storm drainage systems for existing urban areas. (City of Clovis, 2014).
Clovis is traversed by three natural stream systems. Each of these systems consists of sub streams or creeks that collect together to discharge to a centralized natural drainage channel. These systems are the Red Bank, Fancher, and Dog Creek System; the Dry and Dog Creek System; and the Pup Creek/Alluvial Drain System. The latter is a tributary of the original Dry Creek channel. These stream systems collect storm runoff from the foothills east of Clovis and convey such runoff through the Clovis/Fresno metropolitan areas to the Fresno Slough, which is located west of the City of Fresno. (County of Fresno, 2018).
The City’s Public Utilities Department has three Stormwater Patrol teams, made up of 22 public utilities employees, to implement emergency flood control measures. The plan contains information and procedures to rapidly address flooding throughout the City. Contact information and team assignment data is updated regularly as are geographic locations subject to flooding. Appendices include suppliers/contractors, storm basin list, problem drain lists, and partnerships and agencies with shared responsibility for storm preparedness, mitigation, and response. (County of Fresno, 2018).
Existing City Stormwater and Flood Control Facilities
Flood protection in Clovis is afforded by Big Dry Creek Dam on Dry Creek. Big Dry Creek Dam is located approximately 3.5 miles upstream of the City of Clovis. Its main purpose is flood control, and it has a storage capacity of 16,25030,200 acre-feet. Big Dry Creek Reservoir has prevented an estimated $15 million in damage in the Fresno-Clovis area (possibly more after last year’s winter, which would have flooded much of downtown and areas of Fresno and Clovis) since its completion in 1948. (County of Fresno, 2018).
The Big Dry Creek Dam impounds stormwater runoff from Big Dry Creek in the Big Dry Creek Reservoir. The Big Dry Creek Reservoir is owned and operated by the FMFCD and is intended primarily for flood control of winter runoff from the Dry Creek and Dog Creek watersheds. In the 1990s, modifications were made to increase the capacity of the reservoir, and it now provides protection against the 200230-year flood. (County of Fresno, 2018).
Under wet conditions, the Big Dry Creek Reservoir captures runoff and controls releases into artificial ditches and canals, which drain into either Little Dry Creek, located north of the reservoir, or in a southerly direction into Mill Ditch Big Dry Creek. Flows from Little Dry Creek and Mill Ditch Big Dry Creek eventually drain to the San Joaquin River. Flows from the reservoir can also be diverted into Dog Creek, which also eventually drains into the San Joaquin River. During dry weather conditions, the reservoir does not discharge water and is normally empty, with the exception of a 156-acre-foot residual pool. The top of the pool remains below the elevation of an existing discharge gate. (County of Fresno, 2018).
Further, on average, FMFCD’s regional stormwater basin system captures 92 percent of annual rainfall, of which, 70-85 percent of the captured stormwater runoff is recharged into the local groundwater aquifer. The stormwater basins also remove 50-80 percent of the typical stormwater pollutants. (FMFCD, 2020).
Mitigation activities continue to be done in accordance with applicable state and federal requirements for floodplain management and in coordination with the FMFCD. Additional mitigation 3671
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-16 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North measures for critical infrastructure protection and rehabilitation are done through the City’s Capital Improvement Project (CIP) budget. To date, those mitigation projects have included fire station security, water/sewer infrastructure improvements and City Hall building rehabilitation. (County of Fresno, 2018).
Future Stormwater Drainage Demand and System Improvements The 2016 Storm Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Services Plan provides a comprehensive planning document to guide improvement and expansion of the City’s storm drainage system to meet current and future needs in a safe and reliable manner while maintaining compliance with all applicable regulations.
The FMFCD has finalized the design of the Dry Creek Extension Basin located near Brawley and Annadale Avenues. This will be a rural flood control basin located southwest of the City of Fresno. It will provide storage for floodwaters flowing through Dry Creek and other canals, which will provide groundwater recharge benefits. The initial design of the basin was for a 20-acre basin site which is fully excavated. The FMFCD added an adjacent 23-acre site to provide additional storage. This basin is being constructed by the District and is not part of the Federal Redbank and Fancher Creeks Project. (FMFCD, 2017).The FMFCD operates the Big Dry Creek Detention Basin (BDB) (located at 168/Ashlan) and Basin “NN” (located at Valentine/Church), which provide flood relief for Dry Creek/Gould Extension. BDB is a 24-acre site and NN is a 37-acre site. The FMFCD also operates the Dry Creek Extension Basin located near Brawley and Annadale Avenues. This is a rural flood control basin located southwest of the City of Fresno that provides storage for floodwaters flowing through Dry Creek and other canals, also provides groundwater recharge benefits. The initial design of the basin was for a 20-acre basin site, which is fully excavated. The FMFCD added an adjacent 23-acre site to provide additional storage. This basin is being constructed by the District and is not part of the Federal Redbank and Fancher Creeks Project. (FMFCD, 2017).
The FMFCD has identified four primary groups of construction projects: (1) the Redbank‐Fancher Creeks Flood Control Project; (2) District LCA enhancement projects; (3) new development projects; and (4) other routine District maintenance and construction projects. (FMFCD, 2017).
The Corps' Redbank‐Fancher Creeks Project, completed in the summer of 1993, provides the points of control for the flows that will pass through the rural streams storm and flood conveyance system.
Under the LCA with the Corps, the FMFCD is obligated to ensure proper functioning of the Redbank Fancher Creeks Project components. Through implementation of the rural streams program, the FMFCD will improve conveyance capacities of existing channels where necessary, restore obstructed and eradicated channels, and once adequate capacity is achieved, maintain appropriate project conveyance capabilities. These efforts will involve close coordination with private property owners and developers to obtain necessary channel easement dedications. These dedications preserve flooding rights-of-way and allow District access to the stream channels for operation and maintenance. (FMFCD, 2017).
As future development needs warrant, local drainage facilities will be added to augment the flood control facilities. The FMFCD will review new development plans to ensure appropriate design of channels according to the Rural Streams Design Manual, which is currently being developed by the District. Other routine District activities include construction, repair, and maintenance of flood control structures throughout the rural streams/flood control system. (FMFCD, 2017).
The following edits are made to pages 3.14-39 through 3.14-41 in Section 3.14 of the DEIR. 3672
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-17 Impact 3.14-5: The proposed Project has the potential to require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. (Less than Significant) Flooding events can result in damage to structures, injury or loss of human and animal life, exposure of waterborne diseases, and damage to infrastructure. In addition, standing floodwater can destroy agricultural crops, undermine infrastructure and structural foundations, and contaminate groundwater.
As shown on Figure 3.9-2, the majority of the Project site is located within the 500-year flood zone, and the northern and northeastern portion of the Project site is within the 100-year flood zone. It is noted that a small portion in the north of the Development Area is within the 100-year flood zone.
The majority of the Development Area within the Project site is located in an area designated to have a minimal flood hazard. The flood zone designation of the site is also not due to a reduced risk from a levee nor is it located within a regulatory floodway.
Flooding events can result in damage to structures, injury or loss of human and animal life, exposure of waterborne diseases, and damage to infrastructure. In addition, standing floodwater can destroy agricultural crops, undermine infrastructure and structural foundations, and contaminate groundwater.
The portions of the Project site that lie within the 100-year flood zone would require a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) before development would be allowed. A LOMR is a document that officially revises a portion of the effective FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) according to requirements and procedures outlined in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations. A LOMR allows FEMA to revise flood hazard information on a FIRM map via letter without physically revising and reprinting the entire map panel. The LOMR will reflect changes in elevation from grading and no flood insurance requirements would be imposed on structures in these areas once the LOMR is approved by FEMA. The LOMR process is a standard requirement for all new construction or substantial improvements of structures to ensure that they are elevated to or above the base flood elevation.
Through compliance with these existing regulations, impacts would be less than significant and no new structures would be constructed within the 100-year flood plain.
The proposed stormwater collection system functions through storm drainage collection, treatment and discharge. The exact sizing of the underground piping will be engineered during the preparation of the improvement plans, which will be in coordination with FMFCD. The proposed storm drainage collection and detention system will be subject to the State Water Resources Control Board Requirements (SWRCB) and City of Clovis regulations; Phase II, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Requirements; NPDES-MS4 Permit Requirements; and LID Guidelines.
FMFCD will require lot coverage to be provided prior to submittal of improvement plans. The lot coverage is calculated by the District to include the front yard walkway, sidewalk walkway and the rear yard patio equaling an additional 6% of impervious area in addition to the City’s typical lot coverage calculation. This calculation cannot be calculated at this time given that building plans and lot specific landscaping and site improvements have not been prepared. This very detailed level of design would be performed at either the improvement plan or building plan phase of the project.
Ultimately, FMFCD charges a drainage fee that is calculated commensurate with the lot coverage calculation.
3673
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-18 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North FMFCD reviews all grading and improvement plans for consistency with the FMFCD Master Plan. This review ensures that grading does not have an adverse impact to major storm conveyance and to the passage of storm water to the adjacent roadways and existing storm drainage pipelines and inlets.
They require all projects to provide the appropriate surface flowage easements or covenants for any portion of the development area that cannot convey storm water to the public right-of-way without crossing private property.
The initial review by FMFCD has indicated that the “Development Area” is currently located within FMFCD’s adopted Rural Master Plan Drainage Area “BY1.” The adopted Rural Master Plan drainage system is designed to serve the existing land uses of open space, range/pasture and rural residential housing densities ranging from 0 to 0.7 dwelling unit/acre (du/ac). FMFCD has indicated that the existing planned drainage facilities do not have capacity to serve the proposed higher urban density residential land use. FMFCD has indicated that the “Development Area” is required to mitigate the impacts of the increased runoff from the proposed higher density residential land use to the adopted rural planned rate. FMFCD indicated that the “Development Area” may either make improvements to the existing pipeline system to provide additional capacity or may use some type of onsite permanent peak reducing facility in order to match the adopted Rural Master Plan flow rates and eliminate any adverse impacts on the downstream drainage system. FMFCD requested that the grading Engineer contact the District as early as possible to review the proposed site grading for verification and acceptance of design prior to preparing a grading plan.
FMFCD noted that the construction of the Optional Master Plan Facilities and Optional Non-Master Plan Facilities (as shown on Exhibit No. 1 of their letter), will provide permanent drainage service to the portion of the “Development Area” located north of Heirloom Avenue if it were constructed. The construction of the Optional Non-Master Plan Facilities, as shown on Exhibit No. 1, is conceptual at this time, butwill would provide permanent drainage service to the portion of the “Development Area” located south of Heirloom Avenue upon construction of facilities by in Tracts 6292 and 6344. If these optional facilities are not constructed, FMFCD recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. It is noted that the currently proposed storm drainage alignment for the Development Area does not align with this conceptual Optional Non-Master Plan Facilities.
FMFCD noted that the “Development Area” shall not block the historical drainage patterns of existing homes located within the parcels to the east and west side of the “Development Area.” The “Development Area” shall verify to the satisfaction of FMFCD that runoff from these areas has the ability to surface drain to adjacent streets or be collected into PER-3, as shown on Exhibit No. 1 or another alignment that is approved by FMFCD. Either a stub street, channel, or a combination of both shall be provided for those areas, as shown on Exhibit No. 1, unless another alternative is approved by FMFCD.
FMFCD noted that the “Development Area” must identify what streets will pass the major storm and provide calculations that show structures will have adequate flood protection. Based on historical drainage patterns, some of the streets located within the “Development Area” may need to be resized or reconfigured (including, but not limited to, streets that include traffic calming curbs) to pass larger event storms. FMFCD approval is not extended to street configuration. A drainage report indicating the path of the major storm flow and calculations confirming there is adequate protection of finished floors will be necessary.
Stormwater quality standards imposed and monitored by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the SWRCB through the NPDES permit require treatment of stormwater runoff prior to its release 3674
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-19 into drainage features. Stormwater quality is an integral part of FMFCD’s stormwater management system. With the design and construction of flood control improvements included in the proposed storm drainage system in accordance with FMFCD’s requirements, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.
4.0 CUMULATIVE/OTHER CEQA-REQUIRED TOPICS
The following edits are made to pages 4.0-19 in Section 4.0 of the DEIR.
Impact 4.20: Under Cumulative conditions, Project implementation would result in VMT increases that are greater than 87 percent of Baseline conditions (Cumulatively Considerable and Significant and Unavoidable)
Table 3.13-12 3.13-2 in Section 3.13 presents the existing (2019) Regional and Project VMT per Capita.
As shown in Table 3.13-2, the Project VMT per capita is 20.7 percent higher than the City’s VMT per capita threshold. Project design features aim to promote overall mobility with the goal of reducing VMT and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Implementation of these Project design features may possibly reduce the Project’s VMT. The Project design features can help offset some of the VMT impacts of the Project.
Because the development would generate vehicle travel exceeding 1315 percent below the established city-wide average under Existing and Cumulative Conditions, even with implementation of Project Design measures that provide mitigating effects, development of the proposed Project would have a cumulatively considerable contribution and a significant and unavoidable impact.
The following edit is made to page 4.0-28 in Section 4.3 of the DEIR.
Impact 3.13-1: Project implementation would not result in VMT increases that are greater than 87 percent of Baseline conditions;
5.0 ALTERNATIVES
The following edits are made to pages 5.0-1 through 5.0-2 in Section 5.0 of the DEIR.
PR O J E C T OB J E C T I V E S
The project objectives include a collection of goals and objectives, which clearly define the purpose of the Project. In developing the project objectives, it is notable that the City considered the Legislature’s repeated determinations in recent years that California is facing a statewide housing crisis, and it is clearly within a city’s exercise of its legislative discretion to facilitate the construction of new housing, which is defined by the Project Description after thorough evaluation of the development potential. Government Code section 65889.5, subdivision (a)(1)(A), states that “[t]he lack of housing, including emergency shelters, is a critical problem that threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.” Subdivision (a)(1)(D) of that section adds that “[m]any local governments do not give adequate attention to the economic, environmental, and social costs of decisions that result in disapproval of housing development projects, reduction in density of housing projects, and excessive standards for housing development projects.” The principal Project objective is the expansion of the City’s SOI to include the Project site, and the annexation/reorganization, approval and subsequent development of the Development Area. 3675
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-20 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North The quantifiable objectives include the development of up to 605 single-family residential units. The quantifiable objectives include the development of open space totaling approximately 5.54 acres, including 2.25 acres of trails, 2.39 acres of promenade/pedestrian circulation, and 0.90 acres of parks.
The Project objectives also include the installation of new public and private roadways that will provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Project site and surrounding community areas, and other improvements, including water supply, storm drainage, sewer facilities and landscaping to serve the residential uses.
The City has established five additional objectives project goals and objectives goals of the proposed development that more fully inform the Project purpose. These project goals and objectives are as follows:
• Provide residential housing opportunities that are visually attractive and accommodate the future housing demand in Clovis, consistent with policies stated in A Landscape of Choice to modestly increase urban density.
• Establish a mixture of housing types, sizes and densities that collectively provide for local and regional housing demand, consistent with City requirements as stated in the latest Regional Housing Needs Analysis (RHNA).
• Provide infrastructure that meets City standards and is integrated with existing and planned facilities and connections.
• Establish a logical phasing plan designed to ensure that each phase of development would include necessary public improvements required to meet City standards. • Expand the City’s Sphere of Influence in order to establish a logical and orderly boundary that promotes the efficient extension of municipal services.
The Project goals and objectives presented above, were developed by the City in response to the Legislature’s repeated determinations in recent years that California is facing a statewide housing crisis, and the City’s desire to facilitate the construction of new housing in the face of the housing crisis. The City staff has responded with adequate attention to the economic, environmental, and social costs of reduced housing density by establishing a quantified target density that provided the City with significant flexibility to evaluate different scenarios for residential projects on the Project site.
The following edits are made to pages 5.0-72 through 5.0-73 in Section 5.0 of the DEIR.
EN V I R O N M E N T A L L Y SU P E R I O R AL T E R N A T I V E CEQA requires that an environmentally superior alternative be identified among the alternatives that are analyzed in the EIR. If the No Project (No Build) Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, an EIR must also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2)). The environmentally superior alternative is that alternative with the least adverse environmental impacts when compared to the proposed Project.
As Table 5.0-1 presents a comparison of the alternative Project impacts with those of the proposed Project. As shown in the table, the No Project (No Build) Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. However, as required by CEQA, when the No Project (No Build) Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, the environmentally superior alternative among the others 3676
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-21 must be identified. Therefore, the Reduced Density Alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative because all environmental issues would have reduced impacts compared to the proposed Project. It is noted that the Reduced Density Alternative does not fully meet all of the Project objectives. The following two project objectives are not fully met:
• Provide residential housing opportunities that are visually attractive and accommodate the future housing demand in Clovis, consistent with policies stated in A Landscape of Choice to modestly increase urban density.
• Establish a mixture of housing types, sizes and densities that collectively provide for local and regional housing demand, consistent with City Requirements as stated in the latest Regional Housing Needs Analysis (RHNA).
The Reduced Density Alternative would provide housing (150 units), but it would be 455 units less then what is proposed. The first objective listed above references “A Landscape of Choice” which is a regional document that provides direction for the region to utilize urban land as efficiently as possible while providing an adequate supply of a broad range of housing types and densities to meet market demand. One of the guiding principles recommends measures to facilitate and encourage compact growth to all urban land uses, including commercial, industrial and institutional uses. The Reduced Density Alternative is not consistent with this guidance for the region.
The second objective listed above references establishing a mix of housing to provide for local and regional housing demand, and consistent with the City requirements in the latest Regional Housing Needs Analysis (RHNA). In light of the Legislature’s repeated determinations in recent years that California is facing a statewide housing crisis, the State has provided the City with good reason to exercise its legislative discretion to facilitate the construction of new housing. Government Code section 65889.5, subdivision (a)(1)(A), states that “[t]he lack of housing, including emergency shelters, is a critical problem that threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.” Subdivision (a)(1)(D) of that section adds that “[m]any local governments do not give adequate attention to the economic, environmental, and social costs of decisions that result in disapproval of housing development projects, reduction in density of housing projects, and excessive standards for housing development projects.” The Reduced Density Alternative would result in 455 fewer units then the proposed Project, which is not consistent with Legislature’s guidance for solving California statewide housing crisis.
TABLE 5.0-1: COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROJECT IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUE
NO PROJECT
(NO BUILD)
ALTERNATIVE
INCREASED DENSITY
MIXED USE
ALTERNATIVE
REDUCED DENSITY
ALTERNATIVE
REDUCED SPHERE
OF INFLUENCE
ALTERNATIVE
Aesthetics and
Visual Resources Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Agricultural
Resources Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Air Quality Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Biological
Resources Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Cultural and Tribal
Resources Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Geology and Soils Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) 3677
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-22 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North
ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUE
NO PROJECT
(NO BUILD)
ALTERNATIVE
INCREASED DENSITY
MIXED USE
ALTERNATIVE
REDUCED DENSITY
ALTERNATIVE
REDUCED SPHERE
OF INFLUENCE
ALTERNATIVE
Greenhouse Gases,
Climate Change
and Energy
Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Hydrology and
Water Quality Less (Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Equal (2nd Best) Land Use,
Population, and
Housing
Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Noise Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Public Services and
Recreation Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Transportation and
Circulation Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) LessEqual (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) Utilities Less (Best) Greater (4th Best) Less (2nd Best) Equal (3rd Best) GREATER = GREATER IMPACT THAN THAT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT LESS = LESS IMPACT THAN THAT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
EQUAL = NO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN IMPACT FROM THAT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
6.0 REPORT PREPARERS
No changes were made to Chapter 6.0 of the DEIR.
7.0 REFERENCES
No changes were made to Section 7.0 of the DEIR.
APPENDICES
The Appendices are updated to include a Supplementary Report on Groundwater. This is included in the Revised Final EIR as Appendix L as previously published in the Final EIR. 3678
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-23 Appendix L
Supplementary Report on Groundwater Conditions by Ken Schmidt 3679
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-24 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3680
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-25 3681
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-26 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3682
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-27 3683
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-28 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3684
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-29 3685
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-30 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3686
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-31 3687
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-32 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3688
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-33 3689
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-34 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3690
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-35 3691
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-36 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3692
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-37 3693
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-38 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3694
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-39 3695
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-40 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 3696
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ERRATA 4.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 4.0-41 3697
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
4.0 ERRATA
4.0-42 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North This page left intentionally blank
3698
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
FINAL MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 5.0-1 This document is the Final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (FMMRP) for the Shepherd North (Project). This FMMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to “adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.” A FMMRP is required for the proposed Project because the EIR has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts.
The numbering of the individual mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence as found in the Draft EIR.
5.1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The FMMRP, as outlined in the following table, describes mitigation timing, monitoring responsibilities, and compliance verification responsibility for all mitigation measures identified in this Revised Final EIR.
The City of Clovis will be the primary agency responsible for implementing the mitigation measures and will continue to monitor mitigation measures that are required to be implemented during the operation of the proposed Project.
The FMMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the FMMRP are described briefly below:
• Mitigation Measures: The mitigation measures are taken from the Draft EIR in the same order that they appear in that document.
• Mitigation Timing: Identifies at which stage of the project mitigation must be completed. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the agency that is responsible for mitigation monitoring.
• Compliance Verification: This is a space that is available for the monitor to date and initial when the monitoring or mitigation implementation took place. 3699
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
5.0-2 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North TABLE 5.0-1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.4-3: The proposed
Project has the potential to have
direct or indirect effects on
special-status bird species.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1: The Project applicant shall implement the following measure to avoid or minimize impacts on other protected bird species that may occur on the sit:
• Preconstruction surveys for active nests of special-status birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in all areas of suitable habitat within 500 feet of project disturbance. Surveys shall be conducted within 14 days before commencement of any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31) in a given area.
• If any active nests, or behaviors indicating that active nests are present, are observed, appropriate buffers around the nest sites shall be determined by a qualified biologist to avoid nest failure resulting from project activities. The size of the buffer shall depend on the species, nest location, nest stage, and specific construction activities to be performed while the nest is active. The buffers may be adjusted if a qualified biologist determines, based on these same considerations, that a change in buffer size would not be likely to adversely affect the nest. If buffers are adjusted, monitoring will be conducted to confirm that project activity is not resulting in detectable adverse effects on nesting birds or their young. No project activity shall commence within the buffer areas until a qualified biologist has determined that the young have fledged or the nest site is otherwise no longer in use.
City of Clovis
Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
Engineering
Division
Qualified
Biologist
Prior to
construction
activities
Impact 3.4-4: The proposed
Project has the potential to result
in direct or indirect effects on
special-status mammal species.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-2: Prior to grading of each Project development phase, the Project applicant shall conduct a survey of the area to be graded for bat roosts, and if present, the Project applicant shall implement the following measures to avoid or minimize impacts on special-status bats:
• If removal of suitable roosting areas (i.e., buildings, trees, shrubs, bridges, etc.) must occur during the bat pupping season (April 1 through July 31), surveys for active maternity roosts shall be City of Clovis
Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
Engineering
Division
Prior to any
grading
activities
3700
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 5.0-3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
conducted by a qualified biologist. The surveys shall be conducted from dusk until dark.
• If a special-status bat maternity roost is located, appropriate buffers around the roost sites shall be determined by a qualified biologist and implemented to avoid destruction or abandonment of the roost resulting from habitat removal or other project activities.
The size of the buffer shall depend on the species, roost location, and specific construction activities to be performed in the vicinity.
No project activity shall commence within the buffer areas until the end of the pupping season (August 1) or until a qualified biologist conforms the maternity roost is no longer active.
• If a non-maternal roost is located, eviction and exclusion techniques shall be conducted as recommended by the qualified biologist.
Methods may include opening the roosting area to change the air flow and lighting, installing one-way doors, or other appropriate methods that allow the bats to exit and find a new roost. After eviction is believed to be completed, acoustic monitoring, and an evening emergence survey shall be performed by the qualified biologist to ensure eviction is complete. For tree removal, a twostep tree removal process involving removal of all branches that do not provide roosting habitat on the first day, and then the next day cutting down the remaining portion of the tree.
Qualified
Biologist
CULTURAL AND TRIBAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.5-1: Project
implementation has the potential
to cause a substantial adverse
change to a significant historical
or archaeological resource, as
defined in CEQA Guidelines
§15064.5
Mitigation Measure 3.5-1: If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural, historical, archaeological, tribal, and/or human in origin are discovered during construction and/or ground disturbance, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery. A Native American Representative from traditionally and culturally affiliated Native American Tribes that requested consultation shall be immediately contacted and invited to assess the significance of the find and make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment, as necessary. If deemed necessary by the City, a qualified cultural resources specialist meeting the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology, may also assess the City of Clovis
Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
Engineering
Division
Qualified
If any cultural
resources,
including
prehistoric or
historic
artifacts, or
other
indications of
archaeological
resources are
3701
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
5.0-4 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
significance of the find in joint consultation with Native American Representatives to ensure that Tribal values are considered. Work at the discovery location cannot resume until it is determined by the City, in consultation with culturally affiliated tribes, that the find is not a tribal cultural resource, or that the find is a tribal cultural resource and all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of the CEQA, including AB 52, has been satisfied. The qualified cultural resources specialist shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgement.
The following notifications and measures shall apply to potential unique archaeological resources and potential historical resources of an archaeological nature (as opposed to tribal cultural resources), depending on the nature of the find:
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does not represent a cultural resource that might qualify as a unique archaeological resource or historical resource of an
archaeological nature, work may resume immediately and no agency notifications are required.
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does represent a cultural resource that might qualify as a unique archaeological resource or historical resource of an
archaeological nature from any time period or cultural affiliation, he or she shall immediately notify the City and applicable landowner. The professional archaeologist and a representative from the City shall consult to determine whether any unique archaeological resources or historical resources of an
archaeological nature are present, in part based on a finding of eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP or CRHR. If it is determined that unique archaeological resources or historical resources of an archaeological nature are present, the qualified archaeologist shall develop mitigation or treatment measures for consideration and approval by the City. Mitigation shall be developed and implemented in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 and Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, with a preference for preservation in place. Consistent with Section Archaeologist found during
grading and
construction
activities
3702
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 5.0-5
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
15126.4(b)(3), preservation in place may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource;
incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. If approved by the City, such measures shall be implemented and completed prior to commencing
further work for which grading or building permits were issued, unless otherwise directed by the City. Avoidance or preservation of unique archaeological resources or historical resources of an archaeological nature shall not be required where such avoidance or preservation in place would preclude the construction of important structures or infrastructure or require exorbitant expenditures, as determined by the City. Where avoidance or preservation are not appropriate for these reasons, the professional archaeologist, in consultation with the City, shall prepare a detailed recommended a treatment plan for
consideration and approval by the City, which may include data recovery. If employed, data recovery strategies for unique archaeological resources that do not also qualify as historical resources of an archaeological nature shall follow the applicable requirements and limitations set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Data recovery will normally consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim of recovering important scientific data contained within the unique archaeological resource or historical resource of an
archaeological nature. The data recovery plan shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and dissemination of reports to local and State repositories, libraries, and interested professionals. If data recovery is determined by the City to not be appropriate, then an equally effective treatment shall be proposed and implemented.
Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the City, in consultation with the professional archaeologist, determines that the site either: 1) does not contain unique archaeological resources or historical resources of an archaeological nature; or 3703
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
5.0-6 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
2) that the preservation and/or treatment measures have been completed to the satisfaction of the City.
• If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, the contractor shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). The archaeologist shall notify the County Coroner (per §7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of §7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, and Assembly Bill 2641 will be implemented. If the Coroner
determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, then the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project
(§5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains.
If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, then the NAHC can mediate (§5097.94 of the Public
Resources Code). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the
appropriate Information Center; using an open space or
conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agency, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction.
Impact 3.5-2: Project
Implementation has the potential
to disturb human remains,
including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries.
Reference is Made to Mitigation Measure 3-5.1 City of Clovis Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
If any cultural
resources,
including
prehistoric or
historic
3704
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 5.0-7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
Engineering
Division
Qualified
Archeologist
artifacts, or
other
indications of
archaeological
resources are
found during
grading and
construction
activities
Impact 3.5.3: Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public
Resources Code Section 21074,
and that is: Listed or eligible for
listing in the California Register
of Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical
resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 5020.1
(k), or a resource determined by
the lead agency.
Reference is Made to Mitigation Measure 3-5.1 City of Clovis Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
Engineering
Division
Qualified
Archeologist
If any cultural
resources,
including
prehistoric or
historic
artifacts, or
other
indications of
archaeological
resources are
found during
grading and
construction
activities
GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.6-6: The proposed
Project has the potential to
directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature.
Mitigation Measure 3.6-1: Prior to approval of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall ensure that grading and improvement plans include the following note: “If any paleontological resources are found during grading and construction activities of the Project, all work shall be halted immediately within a 200-foot radius of the discovery until a qualified paleontologist has evaluated the find. Work shall not continue at the discovery site until the paleontologist evaluates the find and makes a determination regarding the significance of the resource and identifies recommendations for conservation of the resource, including preserving in City of Clovis
Planning and
Development
Services
Department,
Engineering
Division
Qualified
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit
3705
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
5.0-8 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
place or relocating on the Project site, if feasible, or collecting the resource to the extent feasible and documenting the find with the University of California Museum of Paleontology.”
Paleontologist
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Impact 3.8-1: Potential to create
a significant hazard through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials
or through the reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-1: Prior to the acceptance of improvements, the Project proponent shall hire a licensed well contractor to obtain a well abandonment permit from Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division, and properly abandon the on-site wells, pursuant to review and approval of the City Engineer and the Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-2: The Project proponent shall hire a qualified consultant to perform additional testing prior to the issuance of grading permits for construction activities in the following areas that have been deemed to have potentially hazardous conditions present:
• The area near the three ASTs and four 55-gallon drums (see Figure
3.8-1 of the Draft EIR).
• The areas where USTs may exist, including near the former warehouse and former residences.
• The soils in the area where farming equipment and above ground tanks have been used, and near the former warehouse and former residences (see Figure 3.8-1 of the Draft EIR).
• The area near the four pole-mounted transformers (see Figure 3.8- 1 of the Draft EIR).
The intent of the additional testing is to investigate whether any of the areas, facilities, or soils contain hazardous materials. All activities (construction or demolition) in the vicinity of these materials shall comply with Cal/OSHA asbestos and lead worker construction standards. The ACBM and lead shall be disposed of properly at an appropriate offsite disposal facility. If surface staining is found on the Project site, a hazardous waste specialist shall be Fresno County
Department of
Public Health
Environmental
Health Division
Fresno County
Department of
Public Health
Environmental
Health Division.
Prior to
approval of
improvements
plans
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit
3706
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.0
Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North 5.0-9
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
engaged to further assess the stained area.
Should further soil sampling be required in any stained areas, evenly distributed soil samples shall be conducted for analysis of pesticides and heavy metals. The samples shall be submitted for laboratory analysis of pesticides and heavy metals per DTSC and EPA protocols. The results of the soil sampling shall be submitted to the Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division. If elevated levels of pesticides or heavy metals are detected during the laboratory analysis of the soils, a soil cleanup and remediation plan shall be prepared and implemented prior to the commencement of grading activities.
Further, in the event of a future release/leak of insulating fluids from any of the four pole-mounted transformers, PG&E shall be contacted regarding the testing of the transformers for PCB fluids or for their removal/replacement.
NOISE
Impact 3.11-1: Operational Noise
- The Proposed Project has the
potential to generate a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the
Project in excess of standards
established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-1: A 6-foot-tall barrier shall be constructed along the boundary of the Project site, adjacent to Sunnyside Avenue and Shepherd Avenue (along all unshielded residential private yards within 100 ft of the centerline of Sunnyside and Shepherd Avenues), in order to achieve the City’s exterior noise standards. Noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concrete panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials that achieve the required total height. Wood is not recommended due to eventual warping and degradation of acoustical performance. These walls must be at least 4.2 lbs/ft. These requirements shall be included in the improvements plans prior to their approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-2: The Project developer will ensure that any unshielded residential glass facades within 100 ft of the centerline of Shepherd Avenue or Sunnyside Avenue directly facing the subject roadway must have an STC rating of 30 or more. This includes any 2nd-floor windows, which would not be shielded by the 6- foot sound walls.
City of Clovis
Public Utilities
Department
Prior to
approval of
improvements
plans
3707
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
5.0-10 Final Environmental Impact Report – Shepherd North
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
Impact 3.11-2: Construction
Noise - The Proposed Project has
the potential to generate a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the
Project in excess of standards
established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-3: Construction activities shall adhere to the requirements of the City of Clovis Municipal Code with respect to hours of operation. This requirement shall be noted in the improvements plans prior to approval by the City’s Public Utilities Department.
As soon as practicable (after grading operations), install permanent fencing along the boundary of the area being Developed and the adjacent NonDevelopment Area. Fencing should be a minimum of 6 feet tall and continuous between the source of noise and adjacent residences.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: The contractor shall ensure that the following noise attenuating strategies are implemented during project construction:
• During construction, the contractor shall ensure mufflers are properly installed on all construction equipment capable of being outfitted with mufflers.
• Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. • Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging.
City of Clovis
Public Utilities
Department
During project
construction
3708
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ATTACHMENT 20
3709
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3710
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 908-7064 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
August 15, 2023
FRE-168-R7.805
Application for TTM – Tentative Tract Map
TM 6205, GPA 2021-005, GPA 2021-006
PDP 2021, R 2021-009, RO 307
https://ld-igr-gts.dot.ca.gov/district/6/report/26417
SENT VIA EMAIL
George Gonzalez, Senior Planner
Planning and Development Services Department
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Dear Mx. Gonzalez:
Thank you for the opportunity to the Tentative Tract Map 6205 and the associated entitlements for the Shepherd North project which proposes to develop approximately 155 acres of land for the construction of 605 single-family residential units and parkland that is currently outside the City of Clovis’ city limits. The project is approximately 2 miles north of the State Route (SR) 168 and Fowler Avenue interchange and 2.3 miles northeast of the SR 168 and Herndon Avenue interchange.
This project was previously reviewed as part of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and a Scope of Work (SOW) for a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) with our office providing comment letters dated June 10, 2022 and June 22, 2022 respectively. All previous comment letters still apply to this project. Please see Attachment “A”
Our office is currently reviewing and plans on submitting a comment letter on the project’s released DEIR with comments on the document due September 4, 2023. 3711
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
George Gonzalez, TM 6205
August 15, 2023
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” If you have any other questions, please call or email Christopher Xiong at (559) 908- 7064 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
DAVID PADILLA, Branch Chief
Transportation Planning – North
Attachment A:
Previous Review Comment Letters
3712
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
Attachment A
3713
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 908-7064 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
June 10, 2022
FRE-168-R7.805
Notice of Preparation of an EIR
Shepherd North Project
https://ld-igr-gts.dot.ca.gov/district/6/report/26417
SENT VIA EMAIL
George Gonzalez, Senior Planner
Planning and Development Services Department
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project. The project proposes to develop approximately 155 acres of land for the construction of 605 single-family residential units and parkland that is currently outside the City of Clovis’ city limits.
Approximately 2 miles north of the State Route (SR) 168 and Fowler Avenue interchange, the project is located on the northwest quadrant of Shepherd and Fowler Avenue with the project being bounded on the north by Perrin Road, on the east by Fowler Avenue, on the south by Shepherd Avenue, and on the west by Sunnyside Avenue.
Additional subsequent actions and approvals from the City include a General Plan Amendment, Residential Site Plan Review, Vesting Tentative Maps, and other permits and annexation requests.
The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation networks
Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:
3714
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
George Gonzalez, NOP – EIR Shepherd North Project
June 10, 2022
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
1. Caltrans requests that prior to initiating the Transportation section of the Draft EIR, Caltrans be provided an opportunity to provide comments on the scope of work. If a kick-off meeting for the development of the Draft EIR is planned to be held by the City, Caltrans requests to be included in this meeting
2. Given the proposed number of single-family housing units and proximity to State Route facilities, the proposed project could have potential impacts on state highway facilities. Caltrans recommends that a transportation impact study (TIS) including a Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis be conducted and the scope of the study should include interchanges of SR 168 at Herndon Avenue and Fowler Avenue, and the SR 168/Shepherd Avenue intersection.
3. Caltrans requests that the Draft EIR be submitted for review once completed and circulated by the City.
4. Caltrans recommends the project proponents consider working with the City to convert a portion of the planned residential units to affordable housing units.
5. It is recommended that the City consider a multimodal transportation system (such as bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as public transportation) to provide connectivity of modes between the residential uses and commercial/retail uses to reduce VMT impacts from the project.
6. Caltrans recommends the City consider creating a VMT Mitigation Impact Fee to help reduce potential impacts on the State Highway System.
7. Alternative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multimodal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multimodal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion resulting from the project and related development in the area of the City. The assessment should include the following:
a. Pedestrian walkways should not only be limited to the project’s internal connectivity but be connected to existing walkways and transit facilities outside the project area.
b. The project should consider coordinating connections to local and regional bicycle pathways to encourage the use of bicycles for commuter and recreational purposes.
c. If transit is not available within 1/4-mile of the project area, transit should be extended to provide services to high activity centers of the project. 3715
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
George Gonzalez, NOP – EIR Shepherd North Project
June 10, 2022
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
8. As part of the statewide effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Caltrans recommends the project proponent consider the installation of public Level 2 Electric Vehicle (EV) and DC Fast Charging EV charging stations.
9. Active Transportation Plans and Smart Growth efforts support the state’s 2050 Climate goals. Caltrans supports reducing VMT and GHG emissions in ways that increase the likelihood people will use and benefit from a multimodal transportation network.
If you have any other questions, please call or email Christopher Xiong at (559) 908- 7064 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
DAVID PADILLA, Branch Chief
Transportation Planning – North
3716
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-1041 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
6/22/2022
FRE-168-R7.805
Shepherd North Traffic Scope
https://ld-igr-gts.dot.ca.gov/district/6/report/26417
SENT VIA EMAIL
Sean K. Smith
Supervising Civil Engineer
Engineering Division, City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, California 93612
Dear Mr. Smith,
Thank you for the opportunity to review the scope of work for the North Shepherd Sphere of Influence (SOI) Expansion Transportation Impact Analysis. The 155‐acre project site is located on the northeast corner of the Sunnyside Avenue/Shepherd Avenue intersection, approximately 2 miles north of the State Route (SR) 168/Fowler Avenue interchange and approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the SR 168/Herndon Avenue interchange.
General Comments
The project will be a residential development including 605 single‐family homes on approximately 77‐acres and an additional 78 acres will be used for the local road network utilities, greenspace, landscaping, and pedestrian paths.
The scope of work indicated the TIA will examine the following Caltrans intersections:
- State Route 168 (SR-168) Westbound Ramps/Herndon Avenue - SR-168 Eastbound Ramps/Herndon Avenue
Project related comments
Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:
1. Caltrans concurs the SR 168/Herndon Avenue interchange be included in the TIA. Caltrans recommends a ramp queuing analysis be completed at the SR 168/ Herndon Avenue interchange to identify potential traffic safety impacts. The evaluation for traffic safety impacts should include a review for speed differential between the exit ramps queue and the mainline of SR 99 during the same peak hour study period. 3717
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
Sean K. Smith Shepherd North Traffic Scope
6/22/2022
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”
2. In addition, Caltrans anticipates the project related trips will utilize the SR 168/Fowler Avenue interchange. Therefore, Caltrans request the SR 168/Fowler Avenue interchange undergo the same analysis as mentioned in comment #1.
3. Caltrans concurs with the project including a vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) study.
Improvements for existing/future bike and pedestrian facilities on roads in the vicinity of the Project and connectivity between home to work/home to shops should be considered and included in the VMT mitigation plan.
4. Caltrans recommends the City consider creating a VMT Mitigation Impact Fee so that projects, such as this one, can pay into to mitigate their fair share and provide funding for future transportation projects such as active transportation infrastructure.
5. Caltrans recommends the project proponent(s) consider working with the City to convert a portion of the planned residential units to affordable housing units.
6. Active Transportation Plans and Smart Growth efforts support the state’s 2050 Climate goals. Caltrans supports reducing VMT and GHG emissions in ways that increase the likelihood people will use and benefit from a multimodal transportation network.
7. In summary, the trip generation, peak hours, study scenarios, VMT analysis, and methodology seem reasonable.
If you have any other questions, please call or email Edgar Hernandez at (559) 981-7436 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
David Padilla, Branch Chief
Transportation Planning – North
3718
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3719
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3720
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3721
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3722
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3723
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3724
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3725
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3726
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3727
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3728
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3729
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3730
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3731
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3732
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3733
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3734
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3735
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3736
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3737
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3738
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3739
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3740
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3741
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3742
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3743
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3744
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3745
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3746
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3747
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3748
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3749
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3750
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3751
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3752
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3753
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3754
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3755
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3756
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3757
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3758
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3759
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3760
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
3761
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ATTACHMENT 21
SHEPHERD NORTH PROJECT
GPA2021-006, GPS2021-005, R2021-009, TM6205, & PDP2021-004
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT APPROVAL
Each element of the proposed Shepherd North Project meets the findings that must be considered when making a decision on a project, as outlined below.
Findings – General Plan Amendments GPA2021-006 and GPA2021-005
1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan.
The proposed general plan amendment is consistent with several goals, and policies of the 2014 Clovis General Plan, including those identified above under the section of this staff report titled “Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies.” Furthermore, as described throughout this staff report, the Project will be consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Medium-High Density Residential.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City.
The Project has been reviewed by public safety and utility providers and appropriate conditions have been incorporated to ensure that the applicable standards are adhered to. The proposed amendment will be subject to the Community Facilities District (CFD) funding annexation, which provides additional funding for the provision of public facilities and services for public safety, parks and recreation services, and other important municipal services. Therefore, this finding can be made based on the proposed Project.
3. If applicable, the parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested/anticipated project.
The proposed general plan amendment affects approximately 77 acres of land (Development Area), suitable for the development of the 605-lot gated and non-gated single-family planned residential development. Therefore, the project site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation amendment.
Findings - Prezone R2021-009
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan.
The proposed amendment is consistent with several goals, and policies of the 2014 Clovis General Plan, including those identified above under the section of this staff report titled “Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies.” Furthermore, as described throughout this staff report, the Project will be consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Medium-High Density Residential. 3762
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City.
The Project has been reviewed by public safety and utility providers and appropriate conditions have been incorporated to ensure that the applicable standards are adhered to. The proposed amendment will be subject to the Community Facilities District (CFD) funding annexation, which provides additional funding for the provision of public facilities and services for public safety, parks and recreation services, and other important municipal services. Therefore, this finding can be made based on the proposed Project.
3. The parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/projects.
The proposed amendment affects approximately 77 acres of land (Development Area), suitable for the development of the 605-lot gated and non-gated single-family planned residential development.
Therefore, the project site is physically suitable for the requested zoning designation.
4. The City Council considered the CEQA analysis outlined in the staff report and elsewhere in the Administrative Record and does certify the Revised Final Project Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project; adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
The City Council has had an opportunity to review and consider the entire Administrative Record relating to the Project, which is on file with the Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing. The City Council does certify the Revised Final Project Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project; adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
5. The City Council approval of Prezone 2021-009.
The City Council considered testimony and information received at the public hearing and the oral and written reports from City staff, as well as other documents contained in the record of proceedings (“Administrative Record”) relating to Prezone 2021-009. The facts and evidence in the Administrative Record support approval of Prezone 2021-009.
Findings – Vesting Tentative Tract Map TM6205
1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
The proposed map is consistent with several goals, and policies of the 2014 Clovis General Plan, including those identified above under the section of this staff report titled “Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies.” Furthermore, as described throughout this staff report, the Project is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Medium-High Density Residential. 3763
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development.
The proposed vesting tentative tract map affects approximately 77 acres of land with a density of 7.77 unit per acre. The lot sizes within TM6205 range from 1,980 square feet to 15,943 square feet. Therefore, the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of TM6205.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
As indicated in the Project EIR, the proposed project and associated improvements would not result in any significant impacts with implementation of mitigation measures prescribed in the Revised Final EIR.
Therefore, the Project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish and wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems.
The design of the subdivision will adhere to the Fire Department standards, Clovis Development Code and Building Code regulations for public health and safety compliance.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. This finding may also be made if the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to the review authority to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
All easements acquired by the public at large will be identified during the review process of the final map through the City’s Engineering Division. If necessary, alternative easements will be provided that will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired for access through the proposed TM6205.
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The City Engineer has concluded that the City has capacity to accommodate the proposed Project.
Installation of sewer lines through the proposed subdivision and outside its boundaries will be done in compliance with requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
7. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.
The proposed subdivision will comply with the Clovis Development Code and California Building Code requirements as it relates to heating and cooling opportunities within TM6205. 3764
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
8. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.
The proposed subdivision is proposing a density of 7.77 units per acre, which will be consistent with the Clovis General Plan Land Use designation of Medium-High Residential. The proposed subdivision is singlefamily product type as required by the Clovis General Plan for residential developments.
9. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and to this end the City Council does certify the Revised Final Project Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project; adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
The City Council has had an opportunity to review and consider the entire Administrative Record relating to the Project, which is on file with the Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing. The City Council does certify the Revised Final Project Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project; adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
10. Without the conditions of approval (Attachment 5B and Attachment 6A of this report), the City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of vesting tentative tract map TM6205 (attached and labeled Attachment 5A).
11. The basis for the findings is contained in the March 18, 2024, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the Public Hearing.
In light of court decisions, it is appropriate for the City to make findings of consistency between the required dedications and the proposed development. Every dedication condition needs to be evaluated to confirm that there is a rough proportionality, or that a required degree of connection exists between the dedication imposed and the proposed development. The City of Clovis has made a finding that the dedication of property for this project satisfies the development's proportionate contribution to the City's circulation system. The circulation system directly benefits the subject property by providing access and transportation routes that service the site. Further, the circulation system also enhances the property's value.
Findings - Planned Development Permit PDP2021-004
1. The planned development permit would:
a. Be allowed within the subject base zoning district.
The proposed PDP is allowed within the R-1-PRD Zone District proposed in conjunction with the prezoning of the Project site (Development Area).
3765
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
b. Be consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
Refer to Findings – Prezone 2021-009.
c. Be generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on- and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter and the subject base zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines.
The Project includes provisions to construct both on and off-site improvements in conformance with City’s adopted infrastructure master plans and the standards included in the 2014 General Plan. The design of the improvements support the proposed Project development standards and land use changes identified in the staff report.
d. Ensure compatibility of property uses within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed development.
Refer to Findings – Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6205.
2. The proposed project would produce a comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, incorporation of a program of enhanced amenities, etc.) than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development applications.
Examples of the features in Shepherd North Project that achieve this intent include the following:
• Variation in housing types and densities
• Integration of open space, including one neighborhood park • Comprehensively planned trails, including a proposed community trail along the Shepherd Avenue frontage
• Providing for a corner gateway feature at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues
3. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
The proposed PDP will adhere to the Fire Department standards, Clovis Development Code and Building Code regulations for public health and safety compliance.
4. Proper on-site traffic circulation and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Division 2 of this title (Zoning Districts, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards).
The proposed PDP will comply with the Fire Department standards and City Engineer requirements regarding fire suppression and traffic circulation improvements associated with TM6205. 3766
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
5. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development.
The Project site is not constrained in terms of size, shape, topography or circumstances in a manner that would limit its ability to accommodate the proposed development.
6. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection.
Refer to Findings – Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6205.
3767
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ATTACHMENT 22 3768
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
SHEPHERD SUNNYSIDE NORTHEAST REORGANIZATION
SOI EXPANSION, GPA2021-006, GPA2021-005, R2021-009, TM6205, PDP2021-004, AND RO307
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
Attachment 25
P L A N N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T
1 0 3 3 F I F T H S T R E E T • C L O V I S , C A 9 3 6 1 2
1.1 INTRODUCTION
A Site Specific Service Plan for providing services and improvements to land being annexed to the City is required by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). The site specific service plan provides assurance to LAFCo that newly annexed land to the City will be properly served as urban territory.
The service plan also provides information to property owners, districts and interesting parties who may have projects underway within the vicinity of the proposed annexation.
On November 16, 2023, the Clovis Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing and adopted resolutions recommending that the City Council withhold approval of the following applications:
a. Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project, not make the CEQA findings of fact, not adopt a statement of overriding considerations, and not adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
b. General Plan Amendment 2021-006 amending the circulation element to allow an access point on the north side of Shepherd Avenue, between N. Sunnyside and N. Fowler Avenues. c. General Plan Amendment 2021-005 amending the land use element for approximately 77 acres located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. d. Rezone 2021-009, a request to prezone approximately 77 acres from the Fresno County AL20 Zone District to the Clovis R-1-PRD (Single Family Planned Residential Development) Zone District for property located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. e. Tract Map 6205, a request for a 605-lot single-family subdivision on approximately 77 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. f. Planned Development Permit 2021-004, a request to approve a planned development permit for a 605-lot single family residential development.
On February 20, 2024, the Clovis City Council took action to approve each of the applications outlined below:
a. Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Shepherd North Project, make the CEQA findings of fact, not adopt a statement of overriding considerations, and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
ATTACHMENT 23
3769
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
b. A Resolution of the Clovis City Council approving a request to expand the City’s sphere of influence to include approximately 155 acres of land.
c. General Plan Amendment 2021-006, a request to amend the circulation element to allow an access point on the north side of Shepherd Avenue between N. Sunnyside and N. Fowler Avenues. d. General Plan Amendment 2021-005, a request to amend the land use element for approximately 77 acres located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. e. Rezone 2021-009, a request to prezone approximately 77 acres from the Fresno County AL20 Zone District to the Clovis R-1-PRD (Single Family Planned Residential Development) Zone District for property located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. f. Tract Map 6205, a request for a 605-lot single-family subdivision on approximately 77 acres of property located at the northeast corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. g. Planned Development Permit 2021-004, a request to approve a planned development permit for a 605-lot single family residential development.
On February 20, 2024, the Clovis City Council adopted a resolution addressing Reorganization RO307, requesting the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) take proceedings for the reorganization of the territory known as the Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization. Additionally, the Clovis City Council considered the Fourth Amendment to the MOU between the County of Fresno and City of Clovis associated with the 155-acre SOI expansion request and 77-acre annexation boundaries.
1.2 SERVICES EXISTING OR PROPOSED
1. Community Water Service
The Water Master Plan Update, completed in 2017, by Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, was prepared to support the 2014 Clovis General Plan, and the development plans therein. The plan examined the feasibility of continued growth in the greater Clovis area from a water resource perspective. This included a review of existing and future demands for water from surface, groundwater, and reclaimed water. The study area corresponded with the General Plan planning area. The 2015 Urban Water Management Plan updated the water supply and demand issues identified in the 2017 Master Plan.
The City and Tarpey Village have 37 domestic water wells to provide for the needs of its residents. Some of these have wellhead treatment facilities to treat contaminated groundwater. The wells discharge water into a distribution main grid, based on a minimum of 12-inch mains, spaced at half-mile intervals. The present water storage facilities consist of one elevated tank and three ground level tanks. The total storage capacity is 7 million gallons.
The City began operations of the Surface Water Treatment Facility, located on the Enterprise Canal on the east side of Clovis, in 2004. Kings River water is supplied to the plant via Fresno Irrigation District’s (FID) Enterprise Canal. This 15 million gallon-per-day (MGD) plant allows Clovis to serve existing users and new growth areas, while lessening the demand on groundwater. In 2014, treatment capacity at the SWTF was increased to 22.5 MGD.
In 2009, the City began operation of the Water Reuse Facility (WRF) to treat wastewater from a portion of the City’s growth areas. In 2012, the City began using recycled water from this facility to irrigate public landscapes. At build-out of the system, this facility will be able to produce 8.4 MGD of recycled water.
The strategy for future water supply is termed “conjunctive use” where multiple elements are used to provide a secure long-term supply. It includes using both groundwater and treated surface water to ensure a secure 3770
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
drought-resistant water supply with the flexibility to use surface and groundwater supplies in a cost and operationally-efficient manner. This strategy is conducive to phased development that is critical to both community approval and existing operational constraints.
Water systems for newly developed areas, such as the project site, will be financed by development fees, assessment districts, and capital facilities funding. Additional surface water supplies for certain growth areas will be financed by the Water Supply development fee.
The following water conditions have been placed on the project:
2. Water
1. The applicant shall identify and abandon all water wells to City standards.
2. The applicant shall install water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below and provide an adequately looped and redundant water system prior to occupancy. The water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations.
a. Shepherd Avenue – Relocate the 16” main so the centerline of the entire length between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Fowler Avenue is 33’ south of the street centerline. b. North Sunnyside Avenue – Install 24" main along the PG&E substation frontage to Perrin Avenue.
c. Perrin Avenue – Install 24" main between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Marion Avenue.
d. Interior Streets – Install 8" mains.
e. Interior Private Streets – Install 8” mains.
f. Provide appropriately sized off-site water mains for a redundant water system as approved by the City Engineer.
3. The applicant shall provide dedication of 15-foot-wide utility easements for all on-site water mains, hydrants, blow-offs, and water meters not located in otherwise dedicated rights-of-way.
4. The applicant shall install a City standard water service to each lot of the proposed subdivision.
Water services shall be grouped at property lines to accommodate automatic meter reading system, including installation of connecting conduit. The water meter shall be placed in the sidewalk and not in planters or driveways.
5. The applicant shall notify all property owners’ annexed to the City and along streets where a new water main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City water. Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that water connection fees are required if they choose to connect.
6. Prior to recording a final map of any phase, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is adequate water pressure to serve the units to be constructed. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine the adequacy of water supply/pressure for the proposed development.
7. Applicant acknowledges that water distribution and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that distribution may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such water distribution and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding 3771
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient distribution is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity.
3. Recycled Water
8. The applicant shall install recycled water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below.
The recycled water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. All areas utilizing recycle water for irrigation shall be clearly marked on the improvement plans. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and may require appropriate calculations. a. Shepherd Avenue – Install 24” main between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Fowler Avenue.
b. Paseos, Trails, and Neighborhood Parks – Install mains as necessary to serve the paseos, trails, and the neighborhood parks.
4. Wastewater
The Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility serves the Fresno and Clovis urban area from its location southwest of the two cities. The City of Clovis owns and maintains sewer lines within the City Sphere of Influence, with the exception of the Tarpey Village area, which is maintained by the City of Fresno.
The City operates the Water Reuse Facility which treats wastewater from a portion of the City and provides recycled water for use in public landscapes. This facility will be expanded as required to serve portions of the northwest and northeast growth areas. The City does not have sewer collection facilities constructed for the entire current Sphere of Influence at this time, but all areas have been master planned.
The Clovis Wastewater Master Plan Update in 2017 provided the City with a course of action with respect to wastewater service needs through the year 2035, in keeping with the Clovis General Plan.
Wastewater facilities for newly developed areas will be financed by development fees, assessment districts, and capital facilities funding.
The following sewer conditions have been placed on the project:
9. The applicant shall identify and abandon all septic systems to City standards.
10. The applicant shall install sanitary sewer mains of the size and in the locations indicated below, prior to occupancy. The sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. a. Shepherd Avenue – Install 15" main between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Fowler Avenue.
b. Shepherd Avenue – Install 16" force main between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Fowler Avenue.
c. Shepherd Avenue – Install 8" force main between North Sunnyside Avenue and North Fowler Avenue.
3772
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
d. Interior Streets – Install 8" mains.
11. The applicant shall install one (1) 4" sewer service house branch to each lot within the tentative tract.
12. The applicant shall notify all property owners annexed to the City and along streets where a new sewer main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City sewer. Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that sewer connection fees are required if they choose to connect.
13. The City cannot guarantee at this time that sewer capacity will be available for this development when site construction occurs. The applicant, therefore, waives any claim or demand against the City for any delay in availability of sewer capacity for this subdivision.
14. Applicant acknowledges that sewage collection and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that capacity may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such sewage collection and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient capacity is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment.
5. Dedications and Street Improvements
The following street conditions have been placed on the project.
15. The applicant shall provide right-of-way acquisition or dedicate free and clear of all encumbrances and/or improve the following streets to City standards. The street improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s specific plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the type, location, and grades of existing improvements. a. Shepherd Avenue – Along frontage, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 70' (existing 0' due to a change in the ultimate street centerline alignment) north of centerline and 60’ (existing varies) south of centerline, and improve with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the street, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape strip, 60' (30’ north + 30’ south) of permanent paving, and transitional paving as needed. b. Shepherd Avenue – For orderly development, between the eastern limit of the development and North Fowler Avenue, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 70' (existing varies) north of centerline and 60’ (existing varies) south of centerline, and improve with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the street, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape strip, 60' (30’ north + 30’ south) of permanent paving, and transitional paving as needed.
c. North Sunnyside Avenue – Along frontage, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 47' (existing varies) east centerline, and improve with sidewalk, curb return ramps and landscape strip.
3773
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
d. North Sunnyside Avenue Round-A-Bout – At Heirloom Avenue, dedicate and improve to Federal Highway Administration guidelines and approval of the City Engineer. e. Heirloom Avenue –According to the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map, dedicate to provide for 72’ to 85’ of right-of-way and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk on the south side and pathway on the north side, drive approaches, curb return ramps, streetlights, landscaping and irrigation, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed. f. North Fordham Avenue – Between Shepherd Avenue and Public Street "A” according to the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map, dedicate to provide for 89’ of right-of-way and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk on the east side and pathway on the west side, curb return ramps, streetlights, landscaping and irrigation, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed.
g. Private Street “F” – Between Heirloom Avenue and Perrin Avenue, according to the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map, dedicate to provide for 67.2’ of right-of-way and improve with curb, gutter, pathway on the east side, curb return ramps, streetlights, landscape strip, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed. h. Gated Developments – Provide ample vehicle stacking area outside the travel lanes of the public street that will allow vehicles to wait as vehicles are accessing the control panel to open the security gates. Design a turn-a-round to allow vehicles that cannot enter the complex to return to the street without backing the vehicle up. Provide the Solid Waste Division with remote controls that will allow access for all solid waste and recycling vehicles. i. Public Interior Streets – Dedicate to provide for 50’ or 54’ of right-of-way in conformance with the City policy on street widths, and improve with curb, gutter, 5’ sidewalk adjacent to the curb, drive approaches, curb return ramps, streetlights, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed.
j. Private Interior Streets – For two-way traffic with no parking on both sides, the minimum travel width shall be 25’ with a clear width of 30’. For two-way traffic with parking on one side, the minimum travel width shall be 32’. For two-way traffic with parking on both sides, the minimum travel width shall be 36’.
k. Entry feature streets with median islands shall have a minimum of 22’ wide travel lanes in each direction with parking or without parking.
l. Cul-De-Sacs - dedicate to provide for 52' radius and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, 43' permanent paving and all transitional paving as needed. m. The applicant shall relinquish all vehicular access for all lots backing or siding onto Shepherd and North Sunnyside Avenues.
n. Shepherd Avenue – At the proposed local street, construct a 200-foot eastbound dedicated left-turn pocket and a 100-foot westbound dedicated right-turn lane.
16. The applicant shall provide a dedication for a 10' public utility easement, where applicable, along all frontages or alternate widths approved by the utilities companies.
17. For new onsite ADA paths of travel that connect to the City sidewalk, the applicant shall replace enough sidewalk to provide a compliant landing with appropriate transitions to existing sidewalk grades.
18. The applicant shall remove and repair all damaged or broken concrete improvements. The City Engineer may require the repair of additional improvements if they are damaged prior to occupancy.
19. The applicant shall not install any fences, temporary or permanent in public right-of-way.
20. The applicant shall provide preliminary title report, legal description and drawings for all dedications required which are not on the site. All contact with owners, appraisers, etc. of the adjacent properties where dedication is needed shall be made only by the City. The City will prepare an estimate of acquisition costs including but not limited to appraised value, appraisal costs, negotiation costs, and administrative costs. The applicant shall pay such estimated costs as soon as they are determined by the City.
3774
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
21. The sideyard side of all corner lots shall have full width sidewalk except where planter strips or meandering sidewalk is proposed.
22. The applicant shall obtain "R Value" tests in quantity sufficient to represent all street areas, and have street structural sections designed by a registered civil engineer based on these "R Value" tests.
23. The applicant shall, at the ends of any permanent pavement abutting undeveloped property, install 2" x 6" redwood header boards that shall be placed prior to the street surfacing.
24. Standard barricades with reflectors shall be installed at ends of streets abutting undeveloped property and any other locations to be specified by the City Engineer.
6. Solid Waste Collection
Refuse Collection collects and disposes of solid waste generated by residential and commercial customers located within the City. Private vendors, under City contract, collect waste from select commercial customers and recyclables and yard wastes from residential customers. For improved cost accounting and control, the Refuse Collection Unit is further organized into four sub-accounts identified as Administration, Residential, Commercial, and Community Cleanup.
Refuse Landfill conducts all operations necessary to landfill City refuse in accordance with county, state, and federal requirements. The Clovis landfill is an active Class III landfill which accepts municipal solid waste that is currently permitted through the year 2053.
Refuse Contracts provides refuse-related services to the community through contracts with private vendors.
These include refuse compactor and roll-off services for larger businesses, and residential curbside recycling, and greenwaste programs.
7. Fire Protection
The Fire Department employs two primary measures in determining service for the community and future development. The first measure is distribution. “Distribution” describes station locations that allow for a rapid first-due response deployment to mitigate fire and medical aid emergencies before they result in further life/property loss. Distribution is measured by how much of the jurisdiction is covered by first due units within our adopted response time goal of arrival within 5 minutes or less 90% of the time. The second term, “concentration” is a measure of how many multiple units are within sufficient proximity to provide the necessary tools, equipment and personnel, known as an effective response force, for a large scale incident or when another unit is assigned to a concurrent emergency. An initial effective response force is one that has been determined likely to stop the escalation of a fire emergency and bring it effectively under control.
In addition to these factors, Clovis Fire has conducted several station location studies over the last ten years to ensure efficient and effective operations. Stations have generally been located in between 4.5 to 5 mile squares near major street intersections. Previous studies identified various station configurations that could serve City growth depending on the type of development and infrastructure planned for these areas. Currently, the Clovis Fire Department operates out of five fire stations located throughout the City.
In determining desired levels of resource concentration to maintain existing standards and to provide equal protection to future growth areas, the Clovis Fire Department analyzed the risk assessment, call volume, population, critical task analysis, and industry standards. Depending on the factors previously noted, the number of units needed for an initial effective response force are dispatched as defined in the Critical Task Analysis document.
3775
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
Consideration for community protection must also take into account utilization of Automatic Aid Agreements that provide the closest available resources, regardless of jurisdiction. Using software programs and data from neighboring jurisdictions, fire staff are able to analyze the concentration of units revealing detailed information regarding the deployment of resources necessary to provide an effective fire fighting force within defined response time goals for a geographic area neighboring other fire protection districts.
The Emergency Services Bureau is responsible for providing the resources needed by Fire Department staff who respond daily to requests for emergency and non-emergency services from the citizens of Clovis through four divisions: Operations, Support Services, Training, and Communications. The Operations Division activities include: responding to fires, first responder medical services, mutual/automatic aid, mapping, apparatus replacement, etc. The Training Division activities include coordination of recruitment, testing and training of new employees, in-service training for all Department employees and coordinated use of the Fire Training Center. Support Services Division activities include: apparatus maintenance, facilities maintenance, station supplies, etc. The Communications Division has responsibility for coordinating dispatch services to the Fire Department. Fire dispatch services are provided via a contract with the Fresno County Emergency Medical Services Division. Dispatch services coordinate the emergency response of all City fire resources and mutual or automatic aid resources. The Department continues to promote sound planning, economic efficiency, and effective use of the City resources while providing essential and valuable services.
The Life Safety and Enforcement Bureau is responsible for providing community risk reduction activities through two divisions: Fire Prevention and Emergency Preparedness. The Fire Prevention Division assists local businesses and building development though activities such as inspections and plan review to ensure safe occupancies comply with fire codes, standards, and local ordinances. Additional risk reduction is performed through public education where citizens learn about actions they can take to reduce their fire risk and learn emergency preparedness skills that are essential during times of crisis. Within the Bureau, the Investigations team has the responsibility to investigate all fires for cause and origin, and enforce minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property, and public welfare.
The Emergency Preparedness Division has the responsibility for preparing and carrying out emergency plans to protect property and the citizens of Clovis in case of actual or threatened conditions of disaster or extreme peril. This includes having an emergency plan in place, maintaining an Emergency Operations Center (EOC), ensuring policies and procedures are compliant with the National Incident Management System (NIMS) guidelines and exercises are conducted to evaluate system effectiveness. Within the Emergency Preparedness section are the Hazardous Materials Response Team and an Urban Search and Rescue Team. These teams are capable of responding to emergency incidents that require specialized tools, equipment, and personnel. Some funding for this division is augmented by state and federal grants.
The Fire Administration Division is responsible for supporting all department operations, administering the Accreditation program, and the development and administration of the Fire Department budget. Fire Administration provides administrative analysis, report preparation, coordination of programs, incident response data management, timekeeping, and other routine duties performed daily that support the delivery of emergency and non-emergency services. Fire Administration also identifies, writes, and manages grants to supplement funding for all Department programs.
The following fire conditions have been placed on the project:
25. Two Points of Access: Any development to this parcel will require a minimum of two (2) points of access to be reviewed and approved by the Clovis Fire Department. All required access drives shall remain accessible during all phases of construction which includes paving, concrete work, underground work, landscaping, perimeter walls. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. 2022 CMC 4.4 Section D107. 3776
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
26. Maximum Travel Distance to a Residence on Local Streets from an Expressway, Arterial, or Collector Street: In order to provide first due emergency response and effective response force (ERF), the Fire Department adopted response times include 4:00 minutes for travel. It takes approximately 3 minutes to drive 1.9 miles based on the average speeds of arterial and collector streets. It then takes an additional 1 minute to drive 2,000 feet on a local street based on reduced speed of 25mph. Once fire department apparatus has entered a local street from an arterial or a collector street, the maximum travel distance to a residence shall be 2,000 feet. This distance is based on travel times for apparatus covering a 2 ½ mile by 2 ½ mile area of the city which is the standard insurance service organization (ISO) individual station response area.
27. Street Width: Fire apparatus access width shall be determined by measuring from “base of curb” to “base of curb” for roadways that have curbs. When roadways do not have curbs, the measurements shall be from the edge of the roadway surface (approved all weather surface).
Clovis Fire Standard #1.1
28. Street Width for Single Family Residences: Minimum Access Road Width of 36 feet for Single Family Residences. Roads 36 feet or wider allow for Parking on both sides of street. Access roads near fire department access gates shall be a minimum of 20’ in width and marked as fire lanes.
29. Streets with Median Islands: Streets with median islands shall comply with Clovis Fire Department Standard 1.1. Based on the street width, no trees will be allowed to be planted in the median island.
30. Fire Lane Marking Requirement for Single Family Residences: Based on the street width, fire lane markings will be required along the length of the street from the entry point off Shepherd until the street direction changes heading east. Fire lane markings will also be required on both sides of the median along the entire length of the street. The fire lanes shall be posted with signs and/or the curbs shall be painted red as per Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.1 and identified on site plan.
Clovis Fire Standard #1.1
31. Turning Radius: All access way roads constructed shall be designed with a minimum outside turning radius of forty-five feet (45’) Clovis Fire Standard #1.1
32. Temporary Street Signs: The applicant shall install temporary street signs that meet City Temporary Street Sign Standard #1.9 prior to issuance of building permits within a subdivision.
33. All Weather Access &Water Supply: The applicant shall provide all weather access to the site during all phases of construction to the satisfaction of the approved Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.2 or #1.3.
34. Security Gates: All security gates shall comply with Clovis Fire Department Gates Standard #1.5.
Plans shall be submitted for review and permits issued by Fire Department prior to installation.
Gates shall be inspected and tested for operation prior to any occupancy. a. All vehicle gates for developments containing dwellings or as required by the Fire Chief shall be equipped with an approved “Class II” modulated light detection system capable of receiving a modulated frequency of 14.035 Hz. plus or minus 0.250 Hz. The detection system shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The light detection shall be installed to operate from any angle of approach by Clovis Fire Department Emergency Vehicles. Multiple light detection sensors may be required to be installed to allow access from different angles of approach. All light sensors are required to be tested by Clovis Fire Department Emergency Vehicles for approval.
b. For separate entrance and exit gates when opened, gates shall provide a clear width of not less than 14 feet. A single gate providing entrance and exiting shall provide a clear width of not less than 20 feet.
3777
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
35. Residential Fire Hydrant: The applicant shall install 4 ½” x 2 ½” approved Residential Type fire hydrant(s) and “Blue Dot” hydrant locators, paint fire hydrant(s) yellow with blue top and caps, and paint the curb red as specified by the adopted Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.4. Plans shall be submitted to the Clovis Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. The hydrant(s) shall be charged and in operation prior to any framing or combustible material being brought onto the site. Clovis Fire Standard #1.4. The locations shown on the current tract meet Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.4.
36. Looped Water Main: The applicant shall install approved looped water main capable of the necessary flow of water for adequate fire protection and approved by the Clovis Fire Department.
37. Policy 1.5: Neighborhood connectivity. The transportation network shall provide multimodal access between neighborhoods and neighborhood-serving uses (educational, recreational, or neighborhood commercial uses). The proposed layout does not provide connectivity from Shepherd to any future development to the north.
38. Policy 1.6: Internal circulation. New development shall utilize a grid or modified-grid street pattern.
Areas designated for residential and mixed-use village developments should feature short block lengths of 200 to 600 feet. Both Sheet 3 and Sheet 4 have streets in excess of 600’.
39. Policy 1.8: Network completion. New development shall complete the extension of stub streets planned to connect to adjacent streets, where appropriate. Fordham should be constructed to extend to the north and provide access for through traffic.
8. Law Enforcement
The responsibility of the Police Department is to provide protection and police-related services to the community. The Department’s mission is to do this in a manner that builds public confidence and improves the quality of life in Clovis. Police headquarters is located at the Clovis Civic Center. Currently, the Police Department is allotted for 112 sworn officers. The current ratio is 0.90 sworn officers per 1,000 residents.
In accordance with the recommendations contained in the Police Department Master Service Plan, the Police Department will seek funding to achieve and maintain a ratio of 1.3 officers per 1,000 residents.
Police protection to the unincorporated areas is provided by the Fresno County Sheriff and California Highway Patrol. The City has a mutual aid assistance agreement with both agencies.
The operations of the Police Department, now and as the City grows, will be funded through the General Fund, Community Facilities District (CFD) fund, and grants. It is noted that continued annexation and development without proportionate increase in the funding of safety services will have an effect on the city’s ability to maintain acceptable service levels. If unable to maintain acceptable service levels, the department will have to reduce response to certain calls and possibly eliminate other services altogether. This reduction of services will greatly impact our citizens and the quality of life in our community.
The Department is organized into three major divisions, which are composed of seven budgetary sections.
The following Police Department conditions have been placed on the project:
40. Construction work shall be limited to the hours set forth in the Clovis Municipal Code. (CMC §
5.18.15.)
41. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain the structures and adjoining fences to the project free of graffiti. All forms of graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. (CMC §§
5.18.02(r), 5.18.06 (b).)
3778
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
42. Emergency phone numbers for responsible parties shall be kept current during the building phase of the project.
43. All construction materials shall be located within a secured area or monitored by security staff during non-construction hours.
9. Parks & Recreation
The Parks Section provides maintenance to City parks, trails and trail lighting, street landscaping, City trees, and numerous recreational facilities, including playgrounds and picnic sites; maintains Old Town streetscape; and provides grounds maintenance at City administrative facilities. Some of these areas are maintained by Parks personnel, while others are maintained through contracts administered by the Parks section. Parks also provides support for civic activities such as hanging banners and decorating for Christmas, Rodeo Weekend, Big Hat Days, and Farmer's Market. The Parks Section administers the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), which provides funding for maintenance of certain parks, trails, street landscaping, streetlights, and neighborhood architectural enhancement features for areas within the Landscape Maintenance District. All City owned landscaping that is not within the LMD is funded through the General Fund.
Tract Map 6205 proposes to construct one neighborhood park and has been designed with a community trail on the north side of Shepherd Avenue between N. Sunnyside and N. Fowler Avenues. This community trail will provide connectivity to the existing Dry Creek trail within the Lennar development to the west and the Dry Creek Trailhead at the southwest corner of Shepherd and N. Sunnyside Avenues. The Project will also be constructing additional trails and open space within the proposed development. In addition to the neighborhood park and trails the Project will contribute a dollar amount totaling $150,000 to the City for utilization in future open space and/or park improvements in areas of the community that have a need.
10. Transit Services
The Community Services Division administers various senior citizen programs at the Clovis Senior Activity Center. The Division also administers the City’s Round-Up demand-response transit program, the fixedroute Stageline transit program, and administers the City’s contract with Fresno Area Express (FAX). User fees, and state and federal transit funds and grants support the transit service.
11. Storm Drainage
Storm Drain responds to significant rainfall events by providing sand bags, pumping of flooded areas, monitoring stream channels, placing warning signage, and pumping temporary storm drain basins when needed. It also provides pre-storm cleaning of drain inlets to ensure debris do not hamper proper operation of the storm drain collection system. The project will construct storm drainage facilities in accordance with the standard and requirements of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District.
The following grading and drainage conditions have been placed on the project:
44. The applicant shall contact the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) and address all requirements, pay all applicable fees required, obtain any required NPDES permit, and implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable and Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution. Plans for these requirements shall be included in the previously required set of construction plans, and shall be submitted to and approved by FMFCD prior to the release of any development permits.
45. Portions of the project appear to lie within a flood zone. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code.
3779
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
46. In the event permanent storm drainage facilities are not available, the applicant shall provide temporary on-site retention basins for storm water disposal and provide a cash deposit for each basin to offset the City’s cost of maintaining the basins. The size and design shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer and may change based on design calculations and access requirements for maintenance. The temporary pond maintenance deposit shall be based on size, depth, expected maintenance schedule, etc. However, the property owner shall be responsible for periodic cleaning of toxic material. The temporary basin is solely for the convenience of the subdivision.
47. The owner of the property on which the temporary basin(s) are located shall backfilled said basin(s) within ninety (90) days after notice is given by the City that the basin(s) are no longer needed. In the event the owner fails to backfill said basin(s) within said 90 days, the City may cause the basin to be backfilled. A lien to cover the cost of the work will be placed on the property, including the costs to prepare and enforce the lien. A covenant shall be prepared and recorded on the lot on which the basin(s) is/are located.
48. Grade differentials between lots and adjacent properties shall be adequately shown on the grading plan and shall be treated in a manner in conformance with City of Clovis Standard Drawing No. M4 as modified by the City Council. Any retaining walls required on-site or in public right of way shall be masonry construction. All retaining walls shall be designed by a registered civil engineer.
12. Street Lighting
The City is responsible for maintenance of traffic signals, the cost of energy/repairs/replacements for PG&Eowned streetlights within the City, energy and materials for City-owned streetlights, and maintenance of City-owned streetlights.
The following street lighting condition has been placed on the project:
49. The applicant shall install streetlights per the attached street light exhibit. Streetlights along the major streets shall be installed on metal poles to local utility provider’s standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer. Street light locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval. Streetlights at future traffic signal locations shall be installed on approved traffic signal poles, including all conduits and pull boxes. Streetlights along the major streets shall be owned and maintained by local utility providers. Proof of local utility provider’s approval shall be provided. The applicant may install thematic lighting, as approved by the City Engineer. If the applicant chooses to install thematic lighting, the applicant shall provide a conceptual lighting plan identifying adjacent properties that may be incorporated with thematic lights to create a neighborhood effect. Thematic lighting owned by the City shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment.
13. Schools
The City of Clovis and its sphere of influence lies primarily within the Clovis Unified School District (CUSD).
The Project boundary is located within the Clovis Unified School District. CUSD is managing growth by financing new facilities through bonds, development fees, and state schools funding. The area of the City serviced by FUSD is fully built-out and future development within the City’s sphere of influence will not affect this district.
14. Other Services
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides gas and electrical service to the City of Clovis, its sphere of influence, and Fresno County. Electrical service is supplied by underground and overhead lines routed through three substations in the greater Clovis area. The hierarchy of establishing electrical power lines from generation stations to customers is as follows: transmission distribution; sub-transmission; and 3780
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
service. PG&E provides gas to customers through plastic and steel underground lines. Residents not serviced by PG&E use propane fuel.
15. Financing of Services and Facilities
The City Council has established fiscal policies that govern the city’s financial administration and are designed to safeguard the City’s assets, provide a stable funding base, and ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled. These accounting data allow for the preparation of various accounting reports such as the annual budget and the annual year-end financial report. Following are the financial policies that provide the basis for the financial direction of the city. • The City’s budget policy states that all operating budgets shall be balanced and ongoing costs will not exceed current revenues plus available fund balance that exceeds reserve requirements. The minimum reserve for any operational fund is 10% of the budgeted expenditures with the goal for reserves of 15% of budgeted expenditures unless capital borrowing or extraordinary fiscal conditions require that higher levels of reserves be maintained. As discussed during the five-year forecast, the General Fund target reserve is now set at 25%, the current General Fund reserve is approximately 16.5%. Budgetary and purchasing controls have been instituted that ensure adherence to the adopted budget.
• The Enterprise Funds are to be fully supported by user fees and charges, and the Internal Services Funds are to be funded at appropriate levels to ensure reasonable ability to respond to unforeseen events. Annually, the City has designated a contribution of general funds to the General Government Services Fund (an Internal Service Fund) to address the building space needs for new fire stations, safety training facilities, regional park facilities, business and industrial parks, upgrades and new technology for improved productivity, and major remodeling, repairs, or additions to existing facilities.
• The City will not issue long-term debt to cover current operations. The City will consider the issuance of long-term debt to purchase/build capital assets when those assets will benefit users over several years and it is determined that it is more equitable to spread the capital investment and financing costs of the asset to current and future users of the asset. • Annually the City will have an independent audit of its financial records prepared by a certified public accountant pursuant to generally accepted auditing practices of the government finance industry and submit an annual financial report to the City Council by December 31 for the previous fiscal year.
• Fees for services will be charged directly to users of the services when appropriate and should cover the full cost of service delivery. Fees are to be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that the fee is appropriate for the service provided compared to actual cost or an approved cost index. • Development impact fees will be established to ensure that new growth pays the cost of infrastructure improvements and is not a burden to existing tax payers. • The City will invest available cash assets in a manner consistent with the safeguards and diversity that a prudent investor would adhere to with primary emphasis on preservation of principal, sufficient liquidity to cover anticipated payment outflows, and high yields consistent with the first two goals. The City’s investments will be consistent with Section 53601 of the Government Code of the State of California that identifies which types of investments are eligible for investment of public funds and the maximum percentage of an investment portfolio that is allowed for any one investment.
The City is in compliance with all of its financial policies. 3781
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd Sunnyside Northeast Reorganization February 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
16. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance The City of Clovis has completed an environmental review (an assessment of the Project’s impact on natural and manmade environments) of the proposed project, as required by the State of California. The analysis performed for the Project required the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR). A Draft EIR was completed in July of 2023 and was made available for review by affected agencies and the public between July 21st and September 5th, 2023. The Final EIR for the proposed Project has been prepared in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines. Findings to this effect were made by the Council in conjunction with its approval of the project.
3782
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 1/30 ATTACHMENT 24 3783
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 2/30 3784
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 3/30 3785
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 4/30 3786
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 5/30 3787
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 6/30 3788
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 7/30 3789
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 8/30 3790
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 9/30 3791
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 10/30 3792
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 11/30 3793
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 12/30 3794
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 13/30 3795
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 14/30 3796
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 15/30 3797
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 16/30 3798
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 17/30 3799
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 18/30 3800
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 19/30 3801
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 20/30 3802
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 21/30 3803
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 22/30 3804
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 23/30 3805
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 24/30 3806
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 25/30 3807
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 26/30 3808
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 27/30 3809
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 28/30 3810
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 29/30 3811
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
2/12/2020 Print Document
https://ctyobappprod01.cityofclovis.net/AppNet/PrintHandler.ashx 30/30 3812
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
1 George Gonzalez
From: Martine A. Borges <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 11:28 AM
To: George Gonzalez
Subject: [External] Shephard north project 605 units
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
George
I am a homeowner in Shenandoah Farms since 1999. Just east of this project. I am also fortunate to own a home in Harlan Ranch. Which has been a rental and used by our children as they grew to adults. We have experienced too many terrible experiences (in Harlan) with parking issues here, with our home located directly across from the Elev8ions project on Dara ave. The design flaw simply does not produce ample parking anywhere in the area of this location. And my understanding is that Wilson is has designed this Elev8ion format for the said project. I along with many others in the area are against this condensed housing without ample parking. Garages are to small, driveways too short, and not near enough offsite community parking.
Yes its all good for the developers bottom line and it creates more doors to meet the city's quotas, But it is a nightmare for people moving forward that have to live with this problem into the future. This can be verified by anyone living in Harlan Ranch. We are also completely against any further development to the north, stating that there are countless undeveloped acres that are currently already in the sphere of the Clovis city limits.
thankyou for your time.
Sincerely
Martine A. Borges/Pres
BorgesBrosInc
dba: All American Const
5804 E. Brown ave
Fresno, Ca. 93727
#814291 active
#469241 retired
O: 559-291-7006
fx: 559-291-3914
https://link.edgepilot.com/s/d545c362/lTX7Ht0Skax_RRDgwoDww?u=http://www.allamericanconstruction.org/ Have a pleasant day!
To
help
prot
ect
you
r
priv
acy,
Micr
osof
t
Of…
Links contained in this email have been replaced. If you click on a link in the email above, the link will be analyzed for known threats. If a known threat is found, you will not be able to proceed to the destination. If suspicious content is detected, you will see a warning.
ATTACHMENT 25
3813
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.
ATTACHMENT 26
3814
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: March 18, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider Approval - Res. 24-___, A resolution accepting and authorizing the submission of the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report, including the 2023 Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Staff: Dave Merchen, City Planner/ Lily Cha, Senior Planner Recommendation: Approve
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 24-___
2. 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report
3. Assumptions on Affordability
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Councilmembers should consider recusal if a campaign contribution exceeding $250 has been received from the project proponent (developer, applicant, agent, and/or participants) within the preceding 12 months (Government Code 84308).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider approval of a resolution (Attachment 1) to accept the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report (Attachment 2), including the Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (Appendix A to Attachment 2), and provide authorization to submit the report to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Each year the City is required to submit an APR reflecting its progress in implementing the General Plan (California Government Code Section 65400). The key component of the APR is the Housing Element portion, which must include specific data in a format defined by HCD. This Housing Element APR documents the progress made by the City in implementing policies adopted as part of the 2015-2023 Housing Element (Fifth Cycle). 3815
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
The State requires jurisdictions to consider the APR at a public meeting of the City Council and to accept written and oral comments prior to submitting its APR.
BACKGROUND
The 2014 Clovis General Plan (General Plan) was adopted by the Clovis City Council on August 25, 2014, along with certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). A comprehensive update to the Development Code was adopted at the same time. The General Plan includes the following elements:
Land Use;
Economic Development;
Circulation;
Housing;
Public Facilities and Services;
Environmental Safety;
Open Space and Conservation; and
Air Quality
The Housing Element is a mandated element of the City’s General Plan that must be updated every 8 years. There is no specific requirement in state or local law that the rest of the General Plan be updated on a certain timeline.
The City’s 2015-2023 Housing Element was adopted on March 7, 2016, and was certified by HCD on July 22, 2016. The purpose of a Housing Element is to identify and analyze the housing needs of a jurisdiction in order to maintain, improve, and create housing for all economic segments of the population. As required by law, each year the City must prepare and approve an APR and submit it to HCD and OPR by April 1st.
General Plan APR Summary
The General Plan APR affords OPR the opportunity to identify trends in land use decisions and how these decisions relate to statewide planning and land use goals. On a broader scale, these trends can also serve to inform modifications to the State’s General Plan Guidelines and to track progress of a jurisdiction’s General Plan implementation.
The purpose of the General Plan APR is to:
Provide local legislative bodies and the public with information regarding implementation of their jurisdiction’s General Plan;
Inform the public of the progress in meeting community goals; Demonstrate how land use decisions relate to adopted goals, policies, and measures of the General Plan; and
Provide sufficient information to identify necessary adjustments or modifications to the General Plan to improve implementation.
3816
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
With the exception of the report on the Housing Element, there are few requirements for specific data to be provided or formats to be utilized in the General Plan APR. The City’s 2023 APR is organized into the following sections:
Section I - Introduction: Briefly describes the requirement for the APR and its purpose. Section II - General Plan Implementation Summary: Reports on City’s experience with implementing the General Plan in 2023
Section III - General Plan Background: Provides a summary of the adoption of the City’s General Plan, its structure, and the role of Urban Centers and Specific Plans Section IV - General Plan Amendments: Identifies and describes the general plan amendments approved by the City in 2023 and their relationship to General Plan goals and policies
Section V – Housing Element and General Plan Update: Describes the Housing Element progress and the General Plan Update
Section VI – Major Projects Pending: Identifies and describes several major projects that include general plan amendments that will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in 2024 and 2025
Section VII - Housing Development Update: Provides a brief summary of housing activity in 2023
Appendix A - Housing Element Annual Progress Report: Describes the requirement for the Housing Element APR and points readers to the full Housing Element APR in Attachment 2
OPR encourages each jurisdiction to determine what local relevant issues are important to include in the General Plan APR. As staff and the Council identify new or additional issues that are relevant to the APR’s purpose, they can be added to the report in subsequent years.
Housing Element APR
Ascent Environmental, Inc. has served as the City’s consultant to assist with the preparation of the Sixth Cycle Housing Element including preparation of the Housing Element APRs. The APR is generally comprised of several data tables incorporating activities that occurred in 2023 related to housing development applications, building activity (new construction, entitlements, permits, and completed units), permits issued by affordability, any addition to the current RHNA inventory by rezone entitlement, and program implementation. The 2023 Housing Element APR is included in this report as Appendix A to Attachment 1.
RHNA Progress for 2023
The State of California periodically provides population growth and housing estimates to each regional Council of Governments. The Fresno County Council of Governments (Fresno COG) distributes the regional housing needs to jurisdictions in the region with each jurisdiction’s allocation categorized by income. The purpose of the RHNA process is to ensure that jurisdictions’ General Plans are designed to accommodate the projected housing needs across all income levels.
The City’s current RHNA period runs from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2023. In 2023, Clovis issued building permits for 691 housing units (16 low and very low income, 9 moderate 3817
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
income, and 666 above moderate income units). These figures reflect new units that are affordable to renters and buyers within each category based on their actual income levels, as opposed to assumed affordability based on the density of the housing product. The consultant’s methodology to determine the affordability of housing is included as Attachment 3. In 2023, the following income and affordability factors applied to the Clovis housing market:
Table 1: 2023 Income and Affordability Criteria
Table 2 Ability to Pay for Housing Based on HCD Income Limits, Fresno County (2023) Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6
Extremely Low-Income Households at 30% of Median Family Income Income Level $17,350 $19,800 $24,860 $30,000 $35,140 $40,280 Max. Monthly Gross Rent 1 $434 $495 $622 $750 $879 $1,007 Max. Purchase Price 2 $53,373 $60,910 $76,475 $92,287 $108,099 $123,911 Very Low-Income Households at 50% of Median Family Income Income Level $28,900 $33,000 $37,150 $41,250 $44,550 $47,850 Max. Monthly Gross Rent 1 $723 $825 $929 $1,031 $1,114 $1,196 Max. Purchase Price 2 $88,903 $101,516 $114,282 $126,895 $137,047 $147,198 Low-Income Households at 80% of Median Family Income
Income Level $46,200 $52,800 $59,400 $65,950 $71,250 $76,550 Max. Monthly Gross Rent 1 $1,155 $1,320 $1,485 $1,649 $1,781 $1,914 Max. Purchase Price 2 $142,122 $162,426 $182,729 $202,878 $219,182 $235,486 Moderate-Income Households at 120% of Median Family Income Income Level $70,400 $80,450 $90,500 $100,550 $108,600 $116,650 Max. Monthly Gross Rent 1 $2,053 $2,346 $2,640 $2,933 $3,168 $3,402 Max. Purchase Price 2 $252,662 $288,731 $324,800 $360,869 $389,760 $418,651 Notes: Incomes based on HCD State Income Limits for 2022; FY 2023 AMI: $83,800. 1 Assumes that 30 percent of income is available for either: monthly rent, including utilities; or mortgage payment, taxes, mortgage insurance, and homeowners insurance
2 Assumes 95 percent loan at 7% interest (i.e., 5 percent down payment) and 30-year term; assumes taxes, mortgage insurance, and homeowners’ insurance account for 21 percent of total monthly payments Source: CA Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), 2023 and Ascent, 2024.
Table 2 summarizes the progress the City has made toward meeting the 2013-2023 RHNA. The City was issued a RHNA of 6,328 units (2,321 very low, 1,145 low, 1,018 moderate, and 1,844 above moderate-income units). Since 2013, the City has issued permits for 9,681 units (15 very low, 175 low, 3,551 moderate, and 5,940 above moderate-income units). The City has already met its RHNA projection for moderate and above moderate-income units, and has a remaining unfulfilled RHNA of 2,306 very low and 970 low-income units. 3818
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Table 2: 2015-2023 RHNA Progress as of 2023
Income Level
RHNA
by
Income
Level
Permitted Units by Affordability Total
Units
to Date
Total
Remaining
RHNA by
2013 Income Level -
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Very Low
Deed
Restricted
2,321
- - - - - - - - -
Non- 15 2,306
Deed
Restricted
- - - - - - - 7 8
Low
Deed
Restricted
1,145
- 5 20 2 60 - 73 - -
Non- 175 970
Deed
Restricted
- - - - - - - 7 8
Moderate
Deed
Restricted
1,018
- - - - - - - - -
Non 3,551 0 -
Deed
Restricted
456 395 480 411 507 479 432 382 9
Above Moderate 1,844 1,296 689 542 694 526 645 424 458 666 5,940 0 Total RHNA 6,328
Total Units 1,752 1,089 1,042 1,107 1,093 1,124 929 854 691 9,681 3,276 Relationship between RHNA Progress and Existing Housing Stock The City’s progress towards meeting its RHNA allocation may only consider new construction as evidenced by the issuance of building permits. Though existing housing stock routinely becomes available on the resale or rental market, and those units can potentially be available at affordable rates, by definition RHNA only considers new housing production. The Housing Element does include a general evaluation of the local real estate market and how it relates to affordability. However, the re-sale or rental of individual units is not tracked.
Housing Program Progress
While only newly constructed units are counted toward the RHNA, the City’s current housing programs are essential to encouraging housing development, preserving the existing supply of affordable housing and ensuring low-income residents have access to safe living environments.
Program updates can be found in Table D of Appendix A of Attachment 2. The following are updates of some affordable housing incentives provided through programs:
Affordable Housing Incentives: In 2023, staff published a Request for Proposals to award $1.4 Million in Permanent Local Allocation Program funds. Project selection occurred in 2023 with City Council approval pending in early 2024.
Housing Rehabilitation Program: In 2023, the City provided home repair grants to 7 lowincome households to correct critical health and safety-related deficiencies in the home.
Approximately $345,210 in CDBG funds for the program was expended towards the repairs over three years.
3819
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
o The City has programmed $222,881 in CDBG funds in 2023-2024 fiscal year and has plans to fund up to 20 home repair grants. A total of 6 home repair projects have been completed and 14 are underway.
o In 2023, the City completed rehabilitation of 6 homes utilizing 2020 CalHome Loan Program funds. An additional 11 home repair projects are currently underway. o Staff applied for $5,000,000 in State of California CalHome Program funds for First Time Homebuyer Assistance and Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program funds.
First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program: The City has funded 3 First Time Homebuyer loans for low-income buyers in the 2022-2023 program year with available funding.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
To comply with California Housing Law and Clovis’ adopted Housing Element, staff recommends that the City Council accept the General Plan Annual Progress Report for calendar year 2023 and authorize staff to submit the report to OPR and HCD.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will submit the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
Prepared by: Lily Cha, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: City Manager JH
3820
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 24-___
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS
ACCEPTING THE 2023 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, INCLUDING
THE HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMISSION TO THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH AND
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, California Government Code 65400 requires the City to prepare an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in implementing the General Plan, and the report must include a portion addressing Housing Element program progress; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report for the City (which is incorporated herein by this reference) during the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on March 18, 2024; and
WHEREAS, a report titled 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report was prepared by City staff and the City’s Housing Element consultant in accordance with the requirements of Government Code section 65400, and the Report includes the necessary portion addressing the progress in implementing the Housing Element program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis hereby accepts the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report and authorizes staff to submit the report to the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research as required by applicable law.
* * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on March 18, 2024, by the following vote, to wit.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DATED: March 18, 2024
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
3821
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
GENERAL PLAN
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
2023
Prepared by:
Clovis Planning Division
Department of Planning & Development Services
[email protected]
(559) 324-2335
Attachment 2
3822
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
1 To Office and Planning Research,
This APR is intended to report on the status of the 2014 Clovis General Plan, including information and summaries related to any general plan amendments occurring during the year 2023, as well as the overall status of implementation of the Clovis General Plan.
The Clovis City Council considered and approved the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report (APR) at its regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, March 18, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. at the Clovis City Hall located at 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, CA 93612.
This APR was prepared by the Planning Division of the Clovis Department of Planning and Development Services. For any questions or comments related to the contents of this APR, please contact Dave Merchen, City Planner, at [email protected] or (559) 324-2346.
Sincerely,
David Merchen
City Planner
P L A N N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T
1 0 3 3 F I F T H S T R E E T • C L O V I S , C A 9 3 6 1 2 City Manager 559.324.2060 • Community Services 559.324.2095 • Engineering 559.324.2350 Finance 559.324.2130 • Fire 559.324.2200 • General Services 559.324.2060 • Personnel/Risk Management 559.324.2725 Planning & Development Services 559.324.2340 • Police 559.324.2400 • Public Utilities 559.324.2600 • TTY -711 www.cityofclovis.com
3823
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
RESOLUTION 24-___
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS
ACCEPTING THE 2023 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, INCLUDING
THE HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMISSION TO THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH AND
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, California Government Code 65400 requires the City to prepare an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in implementing the General Plan, and the report must include a portion addressing Housing Element program progress; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report for the City (which is incorporated herein by this reference) during the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on March 18, 2024; and
WHEREAS, a report titled 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report was prepared by City staff and the City’s Housing Element consultant in accordance with the requirements of Government Code section 65400, and the Report includes the necessary portion addressing the progress in implementing the Housing Element program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Clovis hereby accepts the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report and authorizes staff to submit the report to the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research as required by applicable law.
* * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on March 18, 2024, by the following vote, to wit.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DATED: March 18, 2024
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
2 3824
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
3 Table of Contents
Submittal Letter 1
City Council Resolution 2
Annual Progress Report
Section I - Introduction 4
Section II - General Plan Implementation Summary 4
Section III - General Plan Background 5
Section IV - General Plan Amendments 8
Section V – General Plan Review and Audit 11
Section VI – Major Projects Pending 11
Section VII - Housing Development Update 12
Section VIII - Housing Element Annual Progress Report 13 3825
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
4 SECTION I - INTRODUCTION
California Government Code Section 65400 requires that all jurisdictions provide the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) an Annual Progress Report (APR) outlining the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation over the previous year’s 12-month reporting period.
The APR affords OPR the opportunity to identify trends in land use decisions and how these decisions relate to statewide planning and land-use goals. On a broader scale, these trends can also serve to inform modifications to the State’s General Plan Guidelines, and to track progress of a jurisdiction’s General Plan implementation.
The purposes of the General Plan APR are to:
1. Provide local legislative bodies and the public with information regarding implementation of their jurisdiction’s General Plan;
2. Inform the public of the progress in meeting community goals;
3. Demonstrate how land use decisions relate to adopted goals, policies, and measures of the General Plan; and
4. Provide sufficient information to identify necessary adjustments or modifications to the General Plan to improve implementation.
SECTION II - GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY
2023 General Plan Amendment Applications
In 2023, the City accepted applications for six (6) new general plan amendments. One application (GPA2023-003) was processed to completion, resulting in approval. This application was a City of Clovis initiated application to change the maximum density allowance of the HighDensity Residential designation from 25 to 30 dwelling units per acre. The remaining (5) applications are in process. General plan amendment applications are further described in Section IV of this APR.
Ongoing Processing of 2021 General Plan Amendment Applications Four (4) general plan amendments originally filed 2021 are still ongoing. Three applications were filed by Wilson Premier Homes in support of development projects. The fourth request is an application by the City of Clovis to modify the general plan language related to the R-T Park to remove inconsistencies with other planning documents. General plan amendment applications are further described in Section IV of this APR. 3826
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
5 Ongoing Processing of 2022 General Plan Amendment Applications One (1) general plan amendment originally filed in 2022 was approved on May 1, 2023. The application was filed by Stallion Development to re-designate the subject property from the L (Low Density Residential - 2.1 to 4.0 DU/Ac) designation to the MH (Medium High Density Residential - 7.1 to 15.0 DU/Ac) designation. General plan amendment applications are further described in Section IV of this APR.
2023 Progress on Housing Element Update and Comprehensive General Plan Update In 2022, work commenced on the preparation of the Sixth Cycle Housing Element, which will be a comprehensive update to the Fifth Cycle Element adopted by the City in 2016. The Council also instructed the initiation of a review and assessment of the General Plan in 2022, marking the initial phase in considering a potential update to the plan. This process ultimately led the Council to decide on a complete and thorough revision of the General Plan. The Housing Element Update and Comprehensive General Plan Update are further described in Section V of this APR.
Ongoing Processing of Large Projects
In 2023, progress was made on several large projects that are expected to be presented to the Planning Commission and Council in 2024. These projects include two sphere of influence expansion projects, a specific plan, a master development plan, and several large residential tract maps. Large projects are summarized in Section VI of this APR.
SECTION III - GENERAL PLAN BACKGROUND
The 2014 Clovis General Plan (General Plan) was adopted by the Clovis City Council on August 25, 20141, along with certification of the Environmental Impact Report2,3(EIR). A comprehensive update to the Development Code was adopted at the same time. The General Plan includes the following elements:
• Land Use;
• Economic Development;
• Circulation;
• Housing;
• Public Facilities and Services;
• Environmental Safety;
• Open Space and Conservation; and
• Air Quality
1 City of Clovis Resolution 14-82 for the adoption of the 2014 Clovis General Plan 2 City of Clovis Resolution 14-81 for the certification of the 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR 3 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR State Clearinghouse Number 2012061069 3827
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6 The stated vision is “a City that is committed to the Clovis Community Family, their needs, their values, and a quality way of life for all; reflecting that commitment in how it develops and in the activities it undertakes.”
The General Plan focuses on the preservation and enhancement of the existing Clovis community while allowing the continued development of three Urban Centers to ensure the long-term viability of Clovis. The Urban Centers—key components that are carried forward from the 1993 General Plan—are unique sub-communities of Clovis that enable the City to grow while maintaining authentic, small town character and overall livability. Each Urban Center can be implemented by either a specific plan or a master development plan, either of which requires coordinated land use and infrastructure planning. The three Urban Centers are Loma Vista, Northwest (renamed to Heritage Grove), and Northeast. A summary of each Urban Center is provided below.
Loma Vista Urban Center
The Loma Vista Urban Center is implemented by the Loma Vista Specific Plan, adopted by the City in 2003. This Specific Plan outlines guiding principles and a comprehensive land use plan to promote a high quality residential community focused around two community centers, a business campus, and the Reagan Educational Center.
Northwest Urban Center (Heritage Grove)
The General Plan provides fairly specific land use planning for the Northwest Urban Center, with policies that require a comprehensive design document to provide additional development and land use guidance.
The General Plan also envisions that the comprehensive design document for the Northwest Urban Center will:
• Use San Joaquin Valley-appropriate plantings
• Capitalize on views of Owens Mountain and the Sierra Nevada • Achieve compact development patterns that integrate a variety of housing types, sizes, and densities at the neighborhood and community level
• Eliminate as feasible the use of sound walls separating neighborhoods from roads • Develop a well-connected grid system of roads
• Prohibit retail land uses within a quarter mile of any Clovis Unified School District campus
3828
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
7 Northeast Urban Center
The General Plan provides fairly specific land use planning for the Northeast Urban Center, with policies that require a comprehensive design document to provide additional development and land use guidance.
The General Plan envisions that the comprehensive design document (such as a master plan or specific plan), for the Northeast Urban Center will:
• Create a series of urban villages that are distinct but that, taken together, contribute to a common public identity for the Northeast Urban Center • Develop major arterials that are not on a grid pattern; rather, the major arterials flow with the land and capitalize on vistas of the Sierra Nevada and pristine local viewsheds • Provide other streets in a well-connected grid system • Connect neighborhoods, community centers, parks, schools, and commercial districts with a robust non-vehicular circulation system
General Plan Focus Areas
In addition to the General Plan concentration of development patterns within the three Urban Centers, there are also fourteen (14) Focus Areas throughout the City. Focus areas are intend to the complement the General Pan land use designations and, in some cases, expand permissible uses, introduce policy requirements, augment development standards, or may call attention to a complex property.
3829
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
8 SECTION IV - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
The following is a list general plan amendments processed in 2023, followed by a brief summary of each.
GPA
NUMBER PROJECT NAME PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY
COUNCIL STATUS RESOLUTION NUMBERS
2021-003 Wilson Premier Homes TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD*
2021-005 Wilson Premier Homes 11/16/2023 TBD* TBD*
23-24 (PC)
TBD*
2021-006 Wilson Premier Homes 11/16/2023 TBD** TBD*
23-23
TBD*
2021-007 R-T Park “Clean Up” TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD*
2022-001 Stallion Development 1/26/2023 5/1/2023 Approved 23-03 (PC)
23-31 (CC)
2023-001 Heritage Grove Specific Plan TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD* 2023-002 Ashlan-Dewolf Multifamily 1/25/2024 TBD* TBD* TBD* 2023-003 Text Change - Density 8/24/2023 9/18/2023 Approved 23-16 (PC)
23-93 (CC)
2023-004 Vista Ranch TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD*
2023-005 Vista Ranch TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD*
2023-006 Vista Ranch TBD* TBD* TBD* TBD*
*TBD - To be determined - indicates the project has not yet gone for consideration, thus no action has been taken.
GPA2021-003, Wilson Premier Homes (TM 6343)
General Plan Amendment 2021-003 has not yet been fully processed and therefore has not been considered by the Planning Commission or City Council at the time this report was prepared.
GPA2021-003 is a request to amend the General Plan land use designation from M (Medium Density Residential - 4.1 to 7.0 DU/Ac) to MH (Medium-High Density Residential - 7.1 to 15.0 DU/Ac) on approximately 71 acres of land in conjunction with a proposed residential tract map.
This general plan amendment is part of a larger that project includes other entitlements, including an annexation, pre-zone, tract map, and planned development permit. Additional project detail is included in Section VI of this report below. 3830
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
9 GPA2021-005 and GPA2021-006, Wilson Premier Homes (Shepherd North SOI/TM6205) General Plan Amendments 2021-005 and 2021-006 are in the process of public hearing. The Planning Commission considered the applications on November 16, 2023, and voted to recommend that the City Council withhold approval of the general plan amendment requests.
The applications will be considered by the City Council in March of 2024.
GPA2021-005 is a request to amend the General Plan land use designation from RR (Rural Residential - 1.0 DU/2 Ac) to MH (Medium-High Density Residential - 7.1 to 15.0 DU/Ac) on approximately 75 acres of land in conjunction with a residential tract map. GPA2021-006 is being processed concurrently as part of the project and proposes to modify the Circulation Element of the General Plan to allow an access point to Shepherd Avenue – which is currently designated as a limited access expressway. These general plan amendments are part of a larger project that includes other entitlements, including a sphere of influence amendment, annexation, pre-zone, tract map, and planned development permit. Additional project detail is included in Section VI of this report below.
GPA2021-007, City of Clovis (Research & Technology [R-T] Park “Clean Up”) General Plan Amendment GPA2021-007 has not yet been fully processed and therefore has not been considered by the Planning Commission or City Council at the time this report was prepared.
On January 4, 2021, the Clovis City Council approved a resolution initiating amendments to the 2014 Clovis General Plan, Zoning Map, and the Development Code to remove existing inconsistencies between these documents as they relate to the City’s R-T Park area. These efforts will include a General Plan Amendment (GPA2021-007), Rezone (R2021-010), and Ordinance Amendment (OA2021-004). A component of these proposed changes will be to include student and faculty housing in defined areas of the R-T Park associated with the California Health Sciences University (CHSU) campus.
GPA2022-001, Stallion Development
General Plan Amendment 2022-001 was denied without prejudice by the City Council at its March 6, 2023 meeting. Council reconsidered and approved GPA2022-001 on May 1, 2023.
GPA2022-001 was a request to amend the General Plan to re-designate the subject property from the L (Low Density Residential - 2.1 to 4.0 DU/Ac) designation to the MH (Medium High Density Residential - 7.1 to 15.0 DU/Ac) designation. This general plan amendment was proposed in conjunction with a rezoning to maintain consistency between the land use designation and zone district and was intended to facilitate a 12 unit multi-family project. 3831
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
10 GPA2023-001, The Villages Specific Plan
General Plan Amendment 2023-01 has not yet been fully processed and therefore has not been considered by the Planning Commission or City Council at the time this report was prepared.
GPA2023-01 is a request to amend the General Plan land use diagram for several areas within a proposed 900-acre specific plan boundary. The amendment includes: the redistribution of park areas, increase commercial acreage areas, and an increase in residential density for some areas.
This general plan amendment is a part of a larger project that includes a specific plan, annexation, prezoning, residential tract map, planned development permit, and site plan review. Additional project details are included in Section VI of this report below.
GPA2023-002, Ashlan-Dewolf Multifamily
General Plan Amendment 2023-002 is in the process of public hearings. The Planning Commission considered the application on January 25, 2024, and voted to recommend that the City Council approve the general plan amendment request. The application is set to be heard by the City Council for final decision in May of 2024.
GPA2023-002 is a request to amend the General Plan land use designation for approximately
1.62 acres of land from L (Low Density Residential - 2.1-4.0 DU/Ac) and O (Open Space) to the H (High Density Residential - 15.1-30.0 DU/Ac) designation. This general plan amendment is proposed in conjunction with a rezoning application to the maintain consistency between land use designation and zone district and is intended to facilitate a 26 unit multi-family project.
GPA2023-003, Text Change – Density
General Plan Amendment 2023-003 was approved by the City Council at its September 18, 2023, meeting. This general plan amendment was initiated by the City to amend the text in the general plan adjusting the density range for the H (High Density Residential) designation. The amendment adjusted the maximum density from 25.0 dwelling units per acre to 30 units per acre. The amendment was proposed in conjunction with a rezoning to maintain consistency between the ordinance and general plan density allowance. The rezoning also adjusted the height for the R-3 Zone District to accommodate the higher density. The amendments realigned the City’s land use and zoning designations to correspond to the density specifications applicable to the City’s Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).
GPA2023-004, GPA2023-005, GPA2023-006, Vista Ranch Master Plan General Plan Amendment 2023-004, 2023-005, and 2023-006 have not yet been fully processed and therefore have not been considered by the Planning Commission or City Council at the time this report was prepared. These applications are associated with a larger master plan overlay project that is comprised of multiple entitlements including a sphere of influence amendment, annexation, pre-zone, and tract map. Additional project details are included in Section VI of this report below.
3832
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
11 GPA2023-004 is a request to amend the General Plan to adjust land uses within the master plan area. GPA2023-005 is a request to modify Focus Area 13 and create Focus Area 13a. GPA2023- 006 is a request to modify the circulation element, including adding a Shepherd Avenue access.
SECTION V – HOUSING ELEMENT & GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Sixth Cycle Housing Element - City of Clovis
A comprehensive update to the Housing Element of the General Plan has been prepared by the City and its consulting team. This update constitutes the mandatory “sixth-cycle” housing element required by the State of California. HCD’s approval of the document is required, and multiple reviews are often necessary. The initial HCD review period is 90 days and subsequent reviews, if required, are 60 days. The City released the initial draft for public review on March 13, 2023, and forwarded it, along with received comments, to HCD on May 16, 2023. A subsequent draft was submitted to HCD on December 5, 2024. Currently, the City is actively addressing HCD's feedback in a third draft. Approval of the Housing Element is expected by mid-2024.
Comprehensive General Plan Update
The City hired a planning firm (DeNovo Planning Group) in May of 2022 to perform an initial review of the current General Plan before establishing a work plan and scope for a subsequent update. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current General Plan against new legislative requirements as well as local goals and objectives and then develop a set of options, strategies, and recommendations to inform the Council. The Planning Commission and City Council also provided feedback on key topics, issues, and local priorities that should be addressed should a new general plan update be initiated. This information was assembled with feedback from other stakeholders and the consultant’s legislative analysis of the current General Plan.
A General Plan Update Strategy Report was presented to the Council on August 21, 2023, at which time the Council provided direction to initiate a comprehensive update to the General Plan. The City is in the process of drafting a request for proposals (RFP) to invite experienced planning firms to vie for a partnership with the City in the update of the General Plan. It is anticipated that the City will finalize its selection of a consulting firm and enter into a professional services agreement by the summer of 2024.
SECTION VI – MAJOR PROJECTS PENDING
Several major projects are underway that will include or require the approval of a general plan amendment. These projects are described below along with a projected timeline for consideration by the Planning Commission and Council.
3833
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
12 Shepherd North Sphere of Influence Expansion, Annexation and Tract Map - Wilson The Project site is north of the City of Clovis limit line at the northeast corner of N. Sunnyside Avenue and E. Shepherd Avenue. The Project site is approximately 155 acres and includes the approximate 77-acre Development Area and the approximate 78-acre Non-Development Area.
The Development Area includes the parcels that are proposed to be entitled and annexed to allow the subdivision and development of up to 605 residential units, parkland, and public and private infrastructure. The applications include a request for a sphere of influence expansion, pre-zone, annexation, tentative map, planned development permit, and residential site plan review. A general plan amendment (GPA 2021-005) is proposed to change the existing land use designation of the Development Area from RR (Rural Residential) to MH (Medium High Density Residential) designation. A second general plan amendment (GPA2021-006) is proposed to allow an access point along a portion of Shepherd Avenue designated as a limited access expressway. The Non-Development Area includes the parcels being included in the Sphere of Influence (SOI) expansion that will not be entitled for subdivision or development. The project is projected to be presented for consideration by the City Council in March 2024.
Tract Map 6343 and Annexation - Wilson
The proposed project consists of the annexation of 246 acres and the development of 590 residential lots within a 71 acre project site. The proposed lots, averaging 3,329 square feet, would be developed into single-family residences over time. No development is proposed within the remaining 174 acre annexation area surrounding the project site, which includes a combination of drainage basin property, existing rural residential properties, and undeveloped property. Project entitlements include an annexation, prezoning, subdivision tract map, planned development permit, and residential site plan review. A general plan amendment (GPA2021-003) is proposed to change the existing M (Medium Density Residential) designation to the MH (Medium-High Density Residential) designation. The project is projected to be presented for consideration to the Planning Commission and City Council by April and May 2024.
Vista Ranch Sphere of Influence - Wilson
The Vista Ranch Project is located directly northeast of the City, bounded on the north by East Behymer Avenue, on the east by Big Dry Creek Reservoir, on the south by East Shepherd and East Perrin Avenues, and on the west by North Fowler and North Sunnyside Avenues. The Project site is approximately 923 acres and includes a City of Clovis Sphere of Influence (SOI) Expansion. Within the Project area, the Vista Ranch Master Plan area will encompass approximately 509 acres, and that area is proposed to be annexed into the City of Clovis.
Project entitlements include a sphere of influence expansion, annexation, pre-zoning, master plan, and subdivision tract map. A general plan amendment (GPA2023-004) is proposed to amend the existing land use pattern to reflect the modified land use pattern proposed in conjunction with the master plan. GPA2023-005 is a request to modify General Plan Focus Area 3834
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
13 13 and create Focus Area 13a. GPA2023-006 is a request to modify the circulation element, including adding a Shepherd Avenue access. The project is projected to be presented for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by the end of 2024.
The Villages Specific Plan, Annexation and Tract Map – Heritage Development Company A specific plan is proposed for an area encompassing approximately 790 acres located north of Shepherd Avenue and east of Willow Avenue. The project area is currently outside the City limits but within the City’s sphere of influence (SOI). The proposed Specific Plan would be constructed in three phases.
• Phase 1. Phase 1 would include the construction of residential, retail and commercial uses within the Specific Plan Area between East Shepherd Avenue and East Perrin Avenue. At complete buildout, Phase 1 would include the development of approximately 3,587 dwelling units, 711,167 square-feet of retail uses, and 296,458 square-feet of commercial uses built over 343 acres.
• Phase 2. Phase 2 would include the construction of residential, retail and commercial uses within the Specific Plan Area between East Shepherd Avenue and East Behymer Avenue. At complete buildout, Phase 2 would include the development of approximately 1,875 dwelling units, 97,247 square-feet of retail uses, and 338,012 square-feet of commercial uses built over 280 acres.
• Phase 3. Phase 3 would include the construction of residential uses within the Specific Plan Area north of East Behymer Avenue. At complete buildout, Phase 3 would include the development of approximately 1,039 dwelling units built over 167 acres.
Entitlements included with the proposed project include a specific plan, annexation, prezoning, residential tract map, planned development permit, and site plan review. A general plan amendment is proposed to adjust the land use pattern for small portion of the total project area in conjunction with the completion of the specific plan. The general plan amendment for the Villages Specific Plan is not referenced in Section IV of this report because the formal application has not yet been filed. The project is projected to be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration in calendar year 2025.
SECTION VII - HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
In 2023, the City of Clovis issued 617 residential permits, consisting of 589 single-family homes, 0 multi-family units, and 28 accessory dwelling units (ADUs).
Appendix A - Housing Element Annual Progress Report
As a component of the General Plan Annual Progress Report, the City must provide and report on specific information relative to its Housing Element in a Housing Element Annual Progress Report. Utilizing a standard form provided by HCD, data is gathered and input to demonstrate 3835
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
14 the City’s progress towards housing production across affordability levels, development applications received, and updates on housing program implementation for the year 2023. The purpose of the APR is to provide the City Council and the State with the City’s progress on its Housing Element implementation and status towards meeting its allocated share of regional housing needs (RHNA). The Housing Element Annual Progress Report is included as Appendix A. 3836
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title Click here to download APR Instructions
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
Please Start Here
General Information
2023
Clovis
Contact Information
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.
Click here to add rows to a table. If you add too many rows, you may select a cell in the row you wish to remove and type ctrl + d.
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis
93612
Dave
Merchen
City Planner
[email protected]
5593242346
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Attachment 3 Appendix A
3837
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Jurisdiction Clovis
Reporting Year 2023
Housing Element Planning Period 5th Cycle
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 8
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 8
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 9
666
691
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 4 663 398
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 0
5+ units per structure 12 0 99
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 28 15
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 16 691 512
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 32 32
659 659
217
3,194
227
0 0
0 Total Housing Applications Submitted:
Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:
Total Housing Units Approved:
Total Housing Units Disapproved:
Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of SB 35 Streamlining Applications
Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Number of SB 35 Streamlining Applications Approved
Very Low
Low
Moderate
3838
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SB 35 (2017) 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Applications Units Ministerial 213 227
Discretionary 4 2967
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 20 0
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
3839
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Jurisdiction Clovis ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Project Type Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12 13
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total
APPROVED
Units by project
Total
DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Please select
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.
Did the housing
development
application seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government Code
section 65915?
Were incentives
or concessions
reqested
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915
approved?
Please indicate
the status of the
application.
Is the project
considered a
ministerial
project or
discretionary
project?
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 7 0 4 0 16 3167 3194 227 0 556-040-23
NEC Baron &
Perrin Avenues TM 6452 TM 6452
SFD O
9/6/2023
153 153 NONE No No Pending Discretionary
TM 6452 is a planned
residential development
being processed with
PDP2023-001 which
needs approval from
Council. Application is still
considered incomplete.
556-050-01s,
556-050-35s,
556-030-10s,
556-030-12s
North of
Shepherd
between
Minnewawa and
Clovis Avenues
TM 6375 TM 6375
SFD O
9/8/2023
385 385 NONE No No Pending Discretionary TM 6375 is a planned residential development
being processed with
PDP2023-002. A
prezone and annexation
is also being processed
concurrently with TM
6375. Application is still
considered incomplete.
556-010-12,
556-010-28,
556-010-29
Southeast
corner of
Behymer and
peach Avenues
TM XXXX TM XXXX
SFD O
10/3/2023
257 257 NONE No No Pending Discretionary TM XXXX is an
incomplete application
submittal. A prezone and
annexation will be
processed concurrent
with the tract map.
558-010-25,
557-012-02,
557-012-28,
557-012-29,
557-022-11,
557-031-05,
557-031-23,
557-031-24,
557-031-25,
557-031-27,
557-031-35,
557-031-37,
557-031-44
Shpeherd,
Sunnyside,
Byhymer, and
Big Dry Creek
Reservior
TM 6438 TM 6438
SFD O
10/11/2023
2172 2172 NONE No No Pending Discretionary
TM 63438 is an
incomplete application
submittal. The tract map
is being processed
concurrently with general
plan amendments,
prezones, and master
plan development
492-122-15
253 Minnewawa PM2023-003 PM2023-003
SFD O
6/2/2023
4 4 4 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No Approved Ministerial
SB9 lot split and 2
residences on each lot
563-142-53 1491 Alluvial MFRDR2023-001 MFRDR2023-
001
5+ R
5/4/2023
12 12 12 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
Market rate apartments assumed to be
55311205 2652 Fremont
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
00737
ADU R
2/28/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49937314 2531 Bundy
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
02458
ADU R
5/24/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
41037201 109 N Cindy
Ave B
BD-CMBR-23-
02542
ADU R
6/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49211214 261 Minnewawa
Ave B
BD-CMBR-23-
00605
ADU R
2/23/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
30946103 4658 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03540
ADU R
8/21/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
55943107S 1484 N Purdue
Ave B TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-04766
ADU R
12/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
56408024 1187 N Holly
Ave B TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04796
ADU R
12/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
56408018 1196 N Holly
Ave B TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04798
ADU R
12/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49113103 80 N
Woodworth Ave
B
NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-
00333
ADU R
1/31/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
43030251 514 W Pico Ave
B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-01417
ADU R
4/3/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49119223 1514 Gibson
Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-01418
ADU R
4/3/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49209615 148 Acacia Ave
B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-03654
ADU R
9/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
49209820 156 Sunnyside
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
02736
SFD O
6/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bonus Law Applications
10 Housing Development Applications Submitted
3840
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55942002S 1677 Teague
Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-23-00179
SFD O
1/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463201 4187 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
01723
SFD O
4/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463202 4177 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
01724
SFD O
4/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463203 4167 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
01727
SFD O
4/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463204 4157 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
01731
SFD O
4/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463205 4147 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
01732
SFD O
4/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S06 4111 Flint AVE TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-
01990
SFD O
5/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S08 3522 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02117
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S31 3533 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02118
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S10 3542 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02119
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S11 3552 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02120
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S30 3543 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02121
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S09 3532 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02122
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S32 3523 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02123
SFD O
5/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252002 4755
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02201
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252003 4745
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02202
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252004 4735
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02203
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252005 4725
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02204
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252012 4734
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02205
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252013 4744
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02206
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252014 4754
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02207
SFD O
5/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463301 4056 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
02287
SFD O
5/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463307 4136 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
02288
SFD O
5/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463308 4146 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
02289
SFD O
5/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463309 4156 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
02290
SFD O
5/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S22 3585 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02299
SFD O
5/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S18 4144 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02300
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S20 4164 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02308
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S23 3575 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02309
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S24 3565 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02310
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S25 4155 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02311
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S26 4145 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02312
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S27 4135 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02313
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S17 4134 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02314
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S21 4174 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02315
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S19 4154 Lansing
Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02330
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S12 3562 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02331
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S13 3572 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02333
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S15 3592 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02336
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S28 3563 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02338
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S29 3553 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02339
SFD O
5/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252006 4715
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02348
SFD O
5/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252007 4705
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02349
SFD O
5/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
3841
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30902252008 3202 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02350
SFD O
5/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252009 3212 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02351
SFD O
5/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252104 4602 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02368
SFD O
5/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252105 4610 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02369
SFD O
5/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252106 4618 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02370
SFD O
5/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252107 4626 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02371
SFD O
5/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252097 4651 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02380
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252098 4643 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02381
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252099 4635 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02382
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252108 4634 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02383
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252109 4642 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02384
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252110 4650 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02385
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252010 3222 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02390
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252011 4724
Buckingham
Ave
TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-
02391
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252020 4727 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02392
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252021 3232 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02393
SFD O
5/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413010000 4011 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02602
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413030000 4002 Scott Ave BD-CMBR-23-
02604
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413040000 4012 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02605
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413050000 4022 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02607
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413060000 4032 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02608
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413120000 1650 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02609
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413260000 1653 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02610
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413330000 4143 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02611
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413560000 4186 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
02612
SFD O
6/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252017 4757 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02628
SFD O
6/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252019 4737 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02630
SFD O
6/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252026 4736 Hampton
Way
BD-CMBR-23-
02631
SFD O
6/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252027 4746 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02632
SFD O
6/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252028 4756 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02644
SFD O
6/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55465206 1428 Junipero
Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-23-02690
SFD O
6/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467026 1375 Junipero
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-02703
SFD O
6/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252023 3252 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02855
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252024 3262 Simental
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
02856
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252025 4726 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02857
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252034 4719 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02858
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252035 3272 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02860
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252036 3282 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02861
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252093 4683 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02862
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252094 4675 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02864
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252095 4667 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02865
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252096 4659 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02867
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252111 4658 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02868
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252112 4666 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02878
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252113 4674 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02881
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252114 4682 Sussex
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02882
SFD O
6/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
56017030 1237 N Cindy
Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-23-02925
SFD O
6/29/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
3842
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30902252092 3308 Escalante
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03006
SFD O
7/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252091 3318 Escalante
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03007
SFD O
7/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252090 3328 Escalante
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03010
SFD O
7/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252089 3338 Escalante
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03012
SFD O
7/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252088 3348 Escalante
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03013
SFD O
7/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252068 4638 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03014
SFD O
7/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252069 4631 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03015
SFD O
7/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
56017032 584 W Kenosha
Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-23-03054
SFD O
7/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252022 3242 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03125
SFD O
7/18/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413110000 1670 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03153
SFD O
7/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413270000 1673 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03158
SFD O
7/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413320000 4133 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03159
SFD O
7/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413570000 4176 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03160
SFD O
7/19/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413580000 4166 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03186
SFD O
7/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413590000 4156 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03187
SFD O
7/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413610000 4136 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03188
SFD O
7/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413620000 4126 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03189
SFD O
7/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413630000 4116 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03190
SFD O
7/20/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413600000 4146 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03195
SFD O
7/21/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
31030016S14 3582 San
Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-03275
SFD O
7/28/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252070 4641 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03354
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252071 4651 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03355
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252081 4670 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03356
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252082 4660 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03357
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252083 4650 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03358
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252084 4640 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03360
SFD O
8/7/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252031 4749 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03446
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252033 4729 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03448
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252040 4728 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03449
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252041 4738 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03450
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252042 4748 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03451
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252037 3302 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03452
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252038 3312 Simental
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
03453
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252039 4718 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03454
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252048 4721 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03455
SFD O
8/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252072 4661 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03474
SFD O
8/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30946211 3339 Escobedo
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03476
SFD O
8/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252078 3349 Escobedo
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03486
SFD O
8/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252080 4680 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03487
SFD O
8/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252079 4690 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03493
SFD O
8/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252064 4678 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03538
SFD O
8/21/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30946102 4668 Bellaire
Ave
BD-CMBR-23-
03539
SFD O
8/21/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252067 4648 Bellaire
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03541
SFD O
8/21/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413070000 4063 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03605
SFD O
8/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413090000 1710 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03607
SFD O
8/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413290000 1713 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03609
SFD O
8/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413300000 1733 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03610
SFD O
8/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
3843
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6413280000 1693 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03611
SFD O
8/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252073 4671 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03679
SFD O
9/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252018 4747 Hampton
Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03681
SFD O
9/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413080000 1730 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03688
SFD O
9/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413100000 1690 La
Canada Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-03689
SFD O
9/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252138 3245 Lourdes
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03698
SFD O
9/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413020000 4001 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03701
SFD O
9/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413130000 1651 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03729
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413150000 1691 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03730
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413170000 1731 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03731
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413180000 4083 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03732
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413190000 4093 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03733
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413200000 4103 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03734
SFD O
9/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55943402S 1384 N Purdue
Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-03774
SFD O
9/12/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467008 4183 Hoblitt
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03787
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467009 4193 Hoblitt
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03788
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467010 1407 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03790
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467011 1417 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03791
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467012 1427 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03792
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467013 1437 Las Rosas
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03793
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413310000 4123 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
03795
SFD O
9/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413160000 1711 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03929
SFD O
9/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413220000 1712 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03930
SFD O
9/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413230000 1692 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03932
SFD O
9/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413250000 1652 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03933
SFD O
9/25/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467039 4113 Hoblitt
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04138
SFD O
10/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413140000 1671 La
Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04148
SFD O
10/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413210000 1732 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04149
SFD O
10/16/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413240000 1672 Hermosa
Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04150
SFD O
10/17/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55943403S 1520 Enterprise
Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-04287
SFD O
10/31/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55464101 1801 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04315
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55464102 1811 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04316
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463101 1831 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04317
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463102 1841 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04318
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463104 1871 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04320
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463105 1881 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04322
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467051 4102 Mitchell
Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04323
SFD O
11/2/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252046 4741 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04377
SFD O
11/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30902252056 4750 Joaquin
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04378
SFD O
11/8/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463209 4107 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-
04391
SFD O
11/9/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
6413640000 4106 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-
04392
SFD O
11/9/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467047 4142 Mitchell
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04393
SFD O
11/9/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467037 4093 Hoblitt
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04540
SFD O
11/29/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943216 4252 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04562
SFD O
12/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943211 4212 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04563
SFD O
12/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943218 4268 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04564
SFD O
12/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943214 4236 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04565
SFD O
12/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
3844
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30943212 4220 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04566
SFD O
12/1/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943215 4244 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04585
SFD O
12/5/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943220 4284 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04600
SFD O
12/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943219 4276 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04601
SFD O
12/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943213 4228 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04604
SFD O
12/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55463103 1851 Agua
Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04605
SFD O
12/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30943217 4260 Bellaire
Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04606
SFD O
12/6/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467040 4123 Hoblitt
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04640
SFD O
12/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467046 4152 Mitchell
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04641
SFD O
12/11/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
30946203 3322 Simental
Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04701
SFD O
12/14/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
55467050 4112 Mitchell
Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04731
SFD O
12/15/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
56408024 1187 N Holly
Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04794
SFD O
12/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
56408018 1196 N Holly
Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04797
SFD O
12/26/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial
56108111 957 N Citadel
Ave B
BD-CMBR-23-
00486
ADU R
2/13/2023
1 1 1 NONE No No Approved Ministerial ADUs: 30% VL, 30% L, 30% M, 10% AM
0 3845
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Table A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
Entitlements
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 12 4 16
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy Bld 34 SPR 2018-011 BD-CMBM-21-00148 5+ R 0 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3601 SPR 2018-011 BD-CMBM-21-00149 5+ R 0 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3501 SPR 2018-011 BD-CMBM-21-00150 5+ R 0 43060101 784 W Holland Ave RHNA 2019-001 BD-CMBM-21-00181 5+ R 0 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy SPR 2018-011 BD-CMBM-21-01483 5+ R 0 55534322 3072 De Wolf Ave BD-CMBR-21-05390 SFD O 0
55926019S 1808 N Carson Ave TM 5122 BD-CMBR-21-05540 SFD O 0 55926011S 1807 N Coventry Ave TM 5122 BD-CMBR-21-05544 SFD O 0 49207202 120 Woodworth Ave BD-CMBR-22-00045 SFD O 0
55851007 3076 Lester Ave PM 2018-011 BD-CMBR-22-00722 SFD O 0 49215215 356 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 BD-CMBR-22-01454 SFD O 0 49215215 360 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 BD-CMBR-22-01455 SFD O 0 49209820 156 Sunnyside Ave BD-CMBR-23-02736 SFD O 0
5612601740 421 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-00953 SFD O 0 5612601751 436 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01074 SFD O 0 5612601059 563 N Citadel Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01169 SFD O 0 56129044 472 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01184 SFD O 0 56129043 468 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01186 SFD O 0 56129042 464 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01193 SFD O 0 56129041 460 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01197 SFD O 0 5612601755 456 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01198 SFD O 0 5612601051 557 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01204 SFD O 0 56129045 476 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01205 SFD O 0 5612601754 452 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01206 SFD O 0 5612601753 448 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01208 SFD O 0 5612601752 440 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01210 SFD O 0 56129064 561 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01354 SFD O 0 56129063 565 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01360 SFD O 0 56129062 569 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01362 SFD O 0 56129061 573 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01365 SFD O 0 56129060 574 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01371 SFD O 0 56129059 570 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01373 SFD O 0 56129058 566 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01385 SFD O 0 56129057 562 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01392 SFD O 0 56129056 558 N Terry Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01395 SFD O 0 56129055 559 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01400 SFD O 0 56129054 563 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01407 SFD O 0 56129053 567 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01408 SFD O 0 56128065 576 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01419 SFD O 0 56129052 571 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01420 SFD O 0 56129050 496 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01427 SFD O 0 56129049 492 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01432 SFD O 0 56129048 488 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01433 SFD O 0 56128064 572 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01435 SFD O 0 56129047 484 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01436 SFD O 0 56129046 480 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01438 SFD O 0 56129051 575 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01466 SFD O 0 56128061 560 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01467 SFD O 0 56128062 564 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01468 SFD O 0 56128063 568 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-01744 SFD O 0 56128060 561 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02326 SFD O 0 56128057 573 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02330 SFD O 0 56128059 565 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02341 SFD O 0 56128056 577 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02343 SFD O 0 56128058 569 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02344 SFD O 0 56128020 516 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02345 SFD O 0 56128019 512 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02346 SFD O 0 56128018 508 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02348 SFD O 0 56128017 504 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02349 SFD O 0 56128016 500 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02350 SFD O 0 55609012 607 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-02591 SFD O 0 56128024 532 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02727 SFD O 0 56128025 536 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02759 SFD O 0 56128055 578 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02761 SFD O 0 56128054 574 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02762 SFD O 0 56128053 570 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02763 SFD O 0 56128052 566 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02773 SFD O 0 56128051 562 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02774 SFD O 0 56128021 520 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02775 SFD O 0 1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement 3846
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56128023 528 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02776 SFD O 0 56128022 524 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02777 SFD O0 56128010 510 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02778 SFDO0 56128009 514 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02779 SFDO0 56128008 518 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02780 SFDO0 55609050 545 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-02801 SFD O0
56128007 522 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02805 SFDO0 556128006 526 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02811 SFD O0 56127035 598 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02951 SFDO0 56127034 602 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02960 SFDO0 56127028 626 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02961 SFDO0 56127033 606 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02962 SFDO0 56127032 610 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-02963 SFDO0 56127031 614 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03022 SFDO0 56127030 618 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03035 SFDO0 56127027 630 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03036 SFDO0 56127029 622 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03037 SFDO0 56127026 634 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03038 SFDO0 56127025 638 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03039 SFDO0 56127024 642 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03040 SFDO0 56127023 646 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03041 SFDO0 56127022 652 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03042 SFDO0 56127021 656 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03043 SFDO0 5590517613 2773 Vermont Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-21-03162 SFD O0 55609009 667 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-03315 SFD O0 55609057 405 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-03316 SFD O0
56127006 568 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03432 SFD O0 56127007 572 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03433 SFD O0 56127008 576 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03434 SFD O0 56127009 580 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03435 SFD O0 56127010 584 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03436 SFD O0 56127011 583 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03446 SFD O0 56127012 579 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03447 SFD O0 56127013 575 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03448 SFD O0 56127014 571 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03449 SFD O0 56127015 567 N Adler Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03451 SFD O0 56127036 590 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03467 SFDO0 56127037 586 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03468 SFDO0 56127038 582 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03469 SFDO0 56127039 578 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03470 SFDO0 56127040 574 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03472 SFDO0 56127016 566 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03473 SFD O0
56127017 570 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03474 SFD O0
56127018 574 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03475 SFD O0
56127019 578 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03476 SFD O0
56127020 582 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-03477 SFD O0
55609054 465 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-03487 SFD O0
56127005 596 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04013 SFD O0 56127004 592 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04014 SFD O0 56127003 588 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04015 SFD O0 56127002 584 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04029 SFD O0 56127001 580 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04030 SFD O0 56128001 546 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04031 SFDO0 56128002 542 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04033 SFDO0 56128003 538 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04034 SFDO0 56128005 530 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04082 SFDO0 56128050 563 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04083 SFD O0 56128049 567 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04084 SFD O0 56128048 571 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04085 SFD O0 56128047 575 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04086 SFD O0 56128046 579 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04090 SFD O0 56128026 540 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04091 SFD O0 56128027 544 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04092 SFD O0 56128028 548 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04093 SFD O0 56128029 552 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04094 SFD O0 56128030 556 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04095 SFD O0 56128040 565 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04312 SFD O0
56128039 569 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04313 SFD O0
56128038 573 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04319 SFD O0
56128037 577 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04320 SFD O0
56128036 581 N Helm Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04321 SFD O0
56128041 564 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04322 SFD O0 56128042 568 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04325 SFD O0 56128043 572 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04326 SFD O0 56128044 576 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04327 SFD O0 56128045 580 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04328 SFD O0 56128031 560 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04415 SFD O0 56128032 564 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04416 SFD O0 56128033 568 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04417 SFD O0 56128034 572 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04419 SFD O0 56128035 576 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04420 SFD O0 56128070 554 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04427 SFDO0 56128069 558 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04428 SFDO0 56128068 562 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04431 SFDO0 56128067 566 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04442 SFDO0 56128066 570 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 BD-CMBR-21-04443 SFDO0 55609087 401 Vintage Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-21-04880 SFD O0 5590504141 2939 Teague Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-21-05358 SFDO0 3847
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
5590517619 1745 N Park Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-21-05385 SFD O 0 5590517620 1735 N Park Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-21-05386 SFD O0 5590517654 2741 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-21-05387 SFD O0 5590517655 2751 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-21-05388 SFD O0 5590517624 2704 Moody Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-22-00070 SFD O0 5590504131 2997 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00413 SFD O0 5590504115 1677 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00414 SFD O0 5590504112 2965 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00415 SFD O0 5590504113 2975 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00416 SFD O0 5590504111 2955 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00417 SFD O0 5590504114 1687 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00418 SFD O0 5540402010 3075 Keats Ave TM 6349 BD-CMBR-22-00435 SFD O0 5590504109 2935 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00772 SFD O0 5590504108 2925 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00773 SFD O0 5590504110 2945 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00774 SFD O0 56052050S 984 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00812 SFDO0 56052049S 976 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00813 SFDO0 56052033S 985 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00814 SFDO0 56052034S 977 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00816 SFDO0 56052048S 968 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00817 SFDO0 56052047S 960 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00820 SFDO0 56052035S 969 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00821 SFDO0 56052036S 961 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00822 SFDO0 56052046S 952 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-00823 SFDO0 55612013 501 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00837 SFD O0 55612012 513 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00838 SFD O0 55612011 525 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00839 SFD O0 55612010 537 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00840 SFD O0 55612009 549 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00841 SFD O0 55612008 561 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00875 SFD O0 55612007 603 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00876 SFD O0 55612006 615 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00877 SFD O0 55612005 627 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00878 SFD O0 55612004 639 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00879 SFD O0 55612003 651 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00880 SFD O0 55612002 663 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-00882 SFD O0 55942038S 1684 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-00890 SFD O0 55609017 507 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-00911 SFD O0 55609013 587 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-00913 SFD O0 55609016 527 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-00914 SFD O0 55609015 547 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-00916 SFD O0 55609014 567 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-00917 SFD O0 5590504107 2915 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00930 SFD O0 5590504106 2905 Vermont Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00934 SFD O0 5590504105 1694 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00935 SFD O0 5590504103 1674 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-00937 SFD O0 55609026 2120 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01000 SFD O0 55609027 2110 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01001 SFD O0 55609028 2100 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01004 SFD O0 55609029 2090 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01006 SFD O0 55609030 2080 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01007 SFD O0 55609025 2130 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01019 SFD O0 55609024 2140 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01020 SFD O0 55609023 2150 N Perry Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01021 SFD O0 55609022 407 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01022 SFD O0 55609021 427 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01023 SFD O0 55609020 447 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01024 SFD O0 55609019 467 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01026 SFD O0 55609018 487 Heirloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-01027 SFD O0 55939119 1725 N Park Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-22-01060 SFD O0 55939308 1744 N Park Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-22-01072 SFD O0 55464302 1676 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-01113 SFD O0 56052042S 920 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01156 SFDO0 56052044S 936 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01158 SFDO0 56052040S 929 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01160 SFDO0 56052032S 988 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01161 SFD O0 56052025S 932 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01162 SFD O0 56052029S 964 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01163 SFD O0 56052031S 980 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01164 SFD O0 56052028S 956 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01165 SFD O0 56052024S 924 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01166 SFD O0 56052026S 940 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01167 SFD O0 56052043s 928 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01209 SFDO0 56052045S 944 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01272 SFDO0 56052037S 953 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01273 SFDO0 56052039S 937 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01274 SFDO0 56052030S 972 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01275 SFD O0 56052027S 948 Serena Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01276 SFD O0 56052041S 921 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01277 SFDO0 56052038S 945 Everglade Ave TM 6263 BD-CMBR-22-01278 SFDO0 55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01302 SFD O0 55940015S 1765 Lester Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01309 SFD O0 55942004S 1787 Teague Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01310 SFD O0 3848
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55942018S 1730 Trenton Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01312 SFD O0
55465718 4176 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01327 SFD O0 56408019 1186 N Holly Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-22-01407 SFD O0 56017029 1247 N Cindy Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-22-01409 SFD O0 55465303 4085 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01701 SFD O0 55465304 4095 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01705 SFD O0 55465306 4115 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01707 SFD O0 55465308 4135 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01710 SFD O0 55465309 4145 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01711 SFD O0 55465310 4155 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01713 SFD O0 55465311 4165 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01716 SFD O0 55465312 4175 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01717 SFD O0 55465314 4195 Dennis Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-01719 SFD O0 55938201 2613 Vermont Ave TM 6209 BD-CMBR-22-01832 SFD O0 55941020S 1744 Lester Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01936 SFD O0 55941007S 1766 N Renn Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-02019 SFD O0 56408020 1176 N Holly Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-22-02045 SFD O0 56408025 1197 N Holly Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-22-02046 SFD O0 55464502 4161 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02060 SFD O0 55464503 4151 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02062 SFD O0 55464504 4141 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02063 SFD O0 55464505 4131 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02064 SFD O0 55464506 4121 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02065 SFD O0 55464507 4111 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02066 SFD O0 55464508 4101 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02067 SFD O0 55464509 4091 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02068 SFD O0 55464510 4081 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02069 SFD O0 55536236 2101 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-02076 SFD O0 55536250 2160 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-02077 SFD O0 55536238 2061 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-02161 SFD O0 55536234 2141 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-02162 SFD O0 5582900601 1697 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-02297 SFD O0 55612033 2006 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02306 SFD O
0 55612032 2012 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02310 SFDO0 55612031 2018 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02326 SFDO0 55612030 2024 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02331 SFDO0 31030016S37 3555 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02361 SFD O0 31030016S38 3545 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02362 SFD O0 31030016S39 3535 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02363 SFD O0 31030016S40 3525 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02366 SFD O0 31030016S41 3515 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02367 SFD O0 31030016S43 3505 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-02368 SFD O0 56017028 1257 N Cindy Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-22-02375 SFD O0 55612034 2005 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02438 SFDO0 55612035 2011 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02441 SFDO0 55612036 2017 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02448 SFDO0 55612037 2023 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02451 SFDO0 55464511 4071 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02540 SFD O0 55464512 4061 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02541 SFD O0 55464513 4051 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02542 SFD O0 55464514 4041 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02543 SFD O0 55464515 4031 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02551 SFD O0 55464516 4021 Scott Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-02552 SFD O0 55609075 641 Vintage Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02723 SFD O0 55609074 661 Vintage Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02741 SFD O0 55609073 681 Vintage Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02742 SFD O0 55609072 682 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02744 SFD O0
55609071 662 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02748 SFD O0
55609070 642 Bloom Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-02749 SFD O0
55536245 2060 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-02772 SFD O0 55536231 2067 Amanecer Ave TM 6025 BD-CMBR-22-02872 SFD O0 55536202 2087 Amanecer Ave TM 6025 BD-CMBR-22-02874 SFD O0 55536203 3801 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 BD-CMBR-22-02875 SFDO0 55536204 3809 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 BD-CMBR-22-02876 SFDO0 55536205 3817 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 BD-CMBR-22-02879 SFDO0 55611034 500 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-02936 SFD O0 55464201 1797 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-03074 SFD O0 55464202 1777 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-03075 SFD O0 55464203 1757 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-03078 SFD O0 55464204 1737 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-03081 SFD O0 55464205 1717 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-03091 SFD O0 55465401 1447 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03092 SFD O0 55465402 1457 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03093 SFD O0 55465403 1467 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03094 SFD O0 55465404 1477 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03095 SFD O0 55465405 1487 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03096 SFD O0 55465406 1497 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-03097 SFD O0 55611037 536 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03136 SFD O0 55611036 524 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03142 SFD O0 55611035 512 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03144 SFD O0 55611038 548 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03189 SFD O0 55611039 560 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03190 SFD O0 3849
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55611040 602 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03191 SFD O
0 55611041 614 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-03193 SFD O0 55536237 2081 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-03307 SFD O0 55536240 2021 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-03374 SFD O0 55536239 2041 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-03385 SFD O0 5540402003 3026 Keats Ave TM 6349 BD-CMBR-22-03530 SFD O0 55536241 2001 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-03895 SFD O0 55611042 626 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04160 SFD O0 55611043 638 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04161 SFD O0 55611044 650 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04162 SFD O0 55611045 662 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04163 SFD O0 5590210330 1522 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04183 SFD O0 5590210305 1513 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04184 SFD O0 5590210332 1562 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04219 SFD O0 55611031 2058 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04303 SFD O0 55611032 2052 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04304 SFD O0 55611029 2065 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04306 SFD O0 55611028 2059 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04308 SFD O0 55611026 2047 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04310 SFD O0 55611033 2046 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04311 SFD O0 55611030 2064 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04312 SFD O0 5590210333 1528 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04372 SFD O0 55942037S 1694 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-04374 SFD O0 55611027 2053 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04386 SFD O0 55536244 2040 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-04387 SFD O0 55536243 2020 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-04389 SFD O0 55536233 2161 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-04390 SFD O0 5590210322 1583 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04392 SFD O0 55464306 4183 Keats Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04439 SFD O0 55464307 4173 Keats Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04440 SFD O0 55464308 4163 Keats Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04442 SFD O0 55611022 2058 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04603 SFDO0 55611023 2052 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04604 SFDO0 55611024 2046 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04605 SFDO0 55943209S 1529 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04624 SFD O0 55943211S 1509 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04626 SFD O0 55611018 2041 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04735 SFDO0 55611019 2047 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04736 SFDO0 55611020 2053 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04751 SFDO0 55611021 2059 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04752 SFDO0 55464309 1745 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04848 SFD O0 55464310 1725 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04849 SFD O0 55464311 1695 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04850 SFD O0 55464312 1675 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04851 SFD O0 55464313 1655 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-04852 SFD O0 55465205 1438 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-04864 SFD O0 55611025 2040 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-04924 SFDO0 55461014S 3808 Portals Ave TM 6254 BD-CMBR-22-04944 SFD O0 55461015S 3849 Portals Ave TM 6254 BD-CMBR-22-04945 SFD O0 55943206S 1573 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04947 SFDO0 55943208S 1593 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-04951 SFDO0 55465101 1598 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05026 SFD O0 55465102 1578 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05027 SFD O0 55465103 1550 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05028 SFD O0 55465104 1530 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05029 SFD O0 55465201 1478 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05030 SFD O0 55465202 1468 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05031 SFD O0 55465204 1448 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05033 SFD O0 55465207 1418 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05040 SFD O0 5560504166 2220 N Eddy Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05041 SFD O0 55465407 4198 Beverly Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05042 SFD O0 5560504181 2283 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05043 SFD O0 5560504172 2211 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05044 SFD O0 55465408 4188 Beverly Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05045 SFD O0 5560504170 1076 Windmill Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05046 SFD O0 5560504173 2219 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05047 SFD O0 5560504179 2267 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05048 SFD O0 5560504163 2280 N Eddy Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05049 SFD O0 55465409 4178 Beverly Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05050 SFD O0 5560504167 2200 N Eddy Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05052 SFD O0 55465410 4179 San Jose Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05053 SFD O0 55465411 4189 San Jose Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05054 SFD O0 5560504176 2243 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05055 SFD O0 55465412 4199 San Jose Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05056 SFD O0 55605042050 1216 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05059 SFD O0 55465413 1567 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05061 SFD O0 55605042045 2232 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05063 SFD O0 55605042058 2203 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05064 SFDO0 55605042062 2235 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05065 SFDO0 55465414 1577 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05066 SFD O0 55465415 1587 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-22-05067 SFD O0 55605042052 1256 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05068 SFD O0 3850
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55605042056 1346 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05081 SFD O 0 55943203S 1548 Teague Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05094 SFD O0 55605042041 2264 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05095 SFD O0 55605042067 2275 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05096 SFDO0 55605042038 2288 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05097 SFD O0 55605042044 2240 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05098 SFD O0 55605042064 2251 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05099 SFDO0 55605042039 2280 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05100 SFD O0 55605042048 2208 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05101 SFD O0 55605042055 1326 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05102 SFD O0 55605042060 2219 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05103 SFDO0 55605041137 1052 Springtime Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05104 SFD O0 55605041136 1046 Springtime Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05105 SFD O0 5560504164 2260 N Eddy Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05106 SFD O0 5560504175 2235 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05107 SFD O0 5560504169 1066 Windmill Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05108 SFD O0 5560504182 2291 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05109 SFD O0 5560504168 1056 Windmill Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05110 SFD O0 5560504165 2240 N Eddy Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05111 SFD O0 5560504171 2203 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05112 SFD O0 5560504174 2227 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05113 SFD O0 5560504177 2251 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05114 SFD O0 5560504180 2275 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05115 SFD O0 5560504185 2375 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05116 SFD O0 55605041169 1030 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05117 SFD O0 55605041175 1066 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05118 SFD O0 5560504191 1055 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05119 SFD O0 5560504197 1019 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05120 SFD O0 55605041104 2364 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05121 SFD O0 55605041148 1016 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05122 SFD O0 5560504188 1073 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05123 SFD O0 5560504195 1031 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05124 SFD O0 55605041100 2396 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05127 SFD O0 55605041164 1021 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05129 SFD O0 55605041172 1048 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05130 SFD O0 5560504189 1067 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05131 SFD O0 5560504196 1025 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05134 SFD O0 55605041165 1015 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05136 SFD O0 5560504184 2345 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05145 SFD O0 5560504199 1007 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05149 SFD O0 55605041139 1053 Springtime Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05151 SFD O0 30942203 4232 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05152 SFDO0 55605041177 1078 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05153 SFD O0 5560504186 1085 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05154 SFD O0 5560504193 1043 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05155 SFD O0 49106171 227 W Sierra Ave BD-CMBR-22-05161 SFD O0
55605041102 2380 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05162 SFD O0 55605041105 2356 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05163 SFD O0 55605041147 1010 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05165 SFD O0 55605041167 1018 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05166 SFD O0 55605041173 1054 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05168 SFD O0 5560504192 1049 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05169 SFD O0 49106171 237 W Sierra Ave PM 2022-002 BD-CMBR-22-05170 SFD O0 55605041103 2372 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05171 SFD O0 55605041149 1022 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05173 SFD O0 55605041168 1024 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05175 SFD O0 55605041176 1072 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05176 SFD O0 5560504187 1079 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05177 SFD O0 5560504194 1037 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05178 SFD O0 55605041101 2388 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05180 SFD O0 55605041174 1060 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05181 SFD O0 5560504183 2315 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05183 SFD O0 5560504190 1061 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05184 SFD O0 5560504178 2259 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05185 SFD O0 5560504198 1013 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05186 SFD O0 55605041138 1059 Springtime Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05187 SFD O0 55605041166 1009 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05189 SFD O0 55605041170 1036 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05190 SFD O0 57124106S 2682 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05195 SFD O0 57124310S 4280 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05196 SFD O0 57124213S 4341 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05197 SFD O0 57124403S 2649 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05198 SFD O0 57124109S 2622 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05201 SFD O0 55605042094 2233 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05202 SFD O0 57124203S 4241 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05203 SFD O0 57124209S 4301 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05204 SFD O0 57124306S 4320 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05205 SFD O0 57124302S 4360 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05207 SFD O0 57124108S 2642 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05208 SFD O0 57124315S 4230 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05209 SFD O0 57124204S 4251 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05210 SFD O0 49137002 18 N Villa Ave BD-CMBR-22-05214 SFD O0
3851
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
49137001 22 N Villa Ave BD-CMBR-22-05217 SFD O
0 57124208S 4291 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05221 SFD O0 57124307S 4310 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05222 SFD O0 57124104S 2722 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05224 SFD O0 57124311S 4270 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05225 SFD O0 57124212S 4331 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05226 SFD O0 57124303S 4350 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05227 SFD O000000 57124201S 4221 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05236 SFD O0 57124312S 4260 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05237 SFD O0 57124207S 4281 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05239 SFD O0 57124313S 4250 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05240 SFD O0 57124210S 4311 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05241 SFD O0 55943306S 1508 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05243 SFD O0 57124405S 2689 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05244 SFD O0 57124105S 2702 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05245 SFD O0 57124316S 4220 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05246 SFD O0 57124205S 4261 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05247 SFD O0 57124308S 4300 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05248 SFD O0 57124214S 4351 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05250 SFD O0 57124301S 4370 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05251 SFD O0 57124401S 2609 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05252 SFD O0 57124103S 2742 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05253 SFD O0 57124202S 4231 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05254 SFD O0 57124215S 4361 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05256 SFD O0 57124304S 4340 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05257 SFD O0 57124107S 2662 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05258 SFD O0 57124314S 4240 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05259 SFD O0 57124206S 4271 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05260 SFD O0 57124309S 4290 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05261 SFD O0 57124211S 4321 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05262 SFD O0 57124402S 2629 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05263 SFD O0 55605042005 1217 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05264 SFD O0 55605042074 2258 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05265 SFDO0 55605042077 1319 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05266 SFD O0 55605042082 2220 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05267 SFDO0 55605042095 1234 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05268 SFD O0 55605042087 1305 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05269 SFD O0 55605042009 1257 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05270 SFD O0 55605042033 2273 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05271 SFD O0 55605042027 2274 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05272 SFDO0 55605042070 1318 Springtime Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05273 SFD O0 55605042101 1328 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05274 SFD O0 55611001 2041 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05276 SFD O0 55611002 2045 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05277 SFD O0 55611003 2049 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05278 SFD O0 55611004 2053 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05279 SFD O0 55611005 2057 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05280 SFD O0 55611006 2056 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05281 SFD O0 55611007 2052 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05282 SFD O0 55611008 2048 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05283 SFD O0 55611009 2044 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05284 SFD O0 55611010 2043 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05285 SFDO0 55611011 2049 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05286 SFDO0 55611012 2055 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05287 SFDO0 55611013 2061 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05288 SFDO0 55611014 2060 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05289 SFDO0 55611015 2054 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05290 SFDO0 55611016 2048 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05291 SFDO0 55611017 2042 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05292 SFDO0 55611046 712 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05293 SFD O0 55612001 713 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05294 SFD O0 55612038 2020 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05295 SFD O0 55612039 2016 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05296 SFD O0 55612040 2012 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05297 SFD O0 55612041 2008 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05298 SFD O0 55943201S 1578 Teague Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05299 SFD O0 55612042 2009 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05301 SFD O0 55605042093 2225 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05302 SFD O0 55612043 2013 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05303 SFD O0 55612044 2017 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05304 SFD O0 55612045 2021 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05305 SFD O0 55612046 2025 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05306 SFD O0 55605042084 1329 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05307 SFD O0 55612047 2029 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05308 SFD O0 55605042012 1287 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05310 SFD O0 55605042034 2281 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05311 SFD O0 55605042026 2282 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05312 SFDO0 3852
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55605042069 1310 Springtime Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05313 SFD O 0 55605042100 1320 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05315 SFD O0 55605042085 1321 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05317 SFD O0 55605042088 1271 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05318 SFD O0 55605042008 1247 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05319 SFD O0 55611048 2033 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05320 SFD O0 55611047 2037 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 BD-CMBR-22-05321 SFD O0 55605042031 2257 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05322 SFD O0 55605042078 1311 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05324 SFD O0 30942417 3270 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05325 SFD O0 55605042090 1235 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05326 SFD O0 55605042025 2290 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05329 SFDO0 55605042072 2272 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05330 SFDO0 55605042080 2236 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05331 SFDO0 55605042089 1253 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05332 SFD O0 55605042006 1227 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05333 SFD O0 55605042036 2297 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05335 SFD O0 55605042028 2266 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05337 SFDO0 55605042079 1303 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05339 SFD O0 55605042099 1312 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05340 SFD O0 55605042091 2209 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05342 SFD O0 55605042010 1267 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05343 SFD O0 55605042076 1327 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05345 SFD O0 55605042097 1270 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05346 SFD O0 55605042004 1207 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05347 SFD O0 55605042035 2289 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05348 SFD O0 31030016S02 4151 Flint AVE TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05349 SFD O0 55605042030 2250 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05350 SFDO0 55605042068 1302 Springtime Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05351 SFD O0 55605042075 2250 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05352 SFDO0 31030016S33 4132 Flint Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05354 SFDO0 55605042083 2212 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05355 SFDO0 31030016S34 4142 Flint Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05356 SFDO0 55605042007 1237 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05357 SFD O0 55605042032 2265 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05359 SFD O0 55463401 4176 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05360 SFD O0
55605042029 2258 N Elm Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05361 SFDO0 55605042071 1326 Springtime Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05362 SFD O0 55605042092 2217 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05363 SFD O0 55605042011 1277 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05364 SFD O0 55605042073 2266 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05366 SFDO0 55463402 4186 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05367 SFD O0
55605042081 2228 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05368 SFDO0 55854002 3252 Vermont Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05369 SFD O0 55605042098 1304 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05370 SFD O0 55605042086 1313 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05371 SFD O0 55605042046 2224 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05372 SFD O0 55605042042 2256 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05373 SFD O0 55605042053 1276 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05374 SFD O0 55605042061 2227 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05376 SFDO0 55605042037 2296 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05377 SFD O0 55605042051 1236 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05379 SFD O0 55605042057 1366 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05380 SFD O0 30943414 3320 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05381 SFD O0 55605042065 2259 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05382 SFDO0 55605042063 2243 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05383 SFDO0 55463403 1977 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05384 SFD O0 55605042040 2272 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05385 SFD O0 55463404 1957 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05386 SFD O0 55463405 1937 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05387 SFD O0 55463406 1917 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05388 SFD O0 31030016S35 4152 Flint Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05389 SFDO0 55463407 1887 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05393 SFD O0 31030016S36 4162 Flint Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05394 SFDO0 55463408 1867 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05395 SFD O0 31030016S04 4131 Flint AVE TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05396 SFD O0 55463409 1847 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05397 SFD O0 55605042047 2216 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05401 SFD O0 55605042059 2211 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05402 SFDO0 55605042043 2248 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05403 SFD O0 55605042049 1206 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05404 SFD O0 30942210 4288 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05408 SFDO0 55605042054 1306 Windmill Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05410 SFD O0 30942109 4263 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05411 SFDO0 30942205 4248 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05412 SFDO0 30942114 4223 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05413 SFDO0 55605042066 2267 N Duke Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05414 SFDO0 55605041171 1042 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 BD-CMBR-22-05415 SFD O0 30942118 3210 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05416 SFDO0 30942126 3290 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05417 SFDO0 30942211 4217 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05418 SFD O0 30942306 4258 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05419 SFD O0 3853
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30942107 4279 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05420 SFD O0
30942208 4272 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05422 SFDO0 30942112 4239 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05423 SFDO0 30942201 4216 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05424 SFDO0 30942120 3230 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05425 SFDO0 30942123 3260 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05427 SFDO0 30942303 4234 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05428 SFD O0 30942214 4241 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05429 SFD O0 30942217 4265 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05431 SFD O0 55605042002 2338 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05432 SFD O0 30942108 4271 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05433 SFDO0 30942111 4247 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05434 SFDO0 30942202 4224 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05435 SFDO0 30942122 3250 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05437 SFDO0 30942124 3270 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05438 SFDO0 30942302 4226 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05439 SFD O0 30942216 4257 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05440 SFD O0 55605042017 1228 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05441 SFD O0 30942209 4280 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05442 SFDO0 30942206 4256 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05443 SFDO0 30942116 4207 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05444 SFDO0 30942119 3220 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05445 SFDO0 30942213 4233 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05446 SFD O0 55605042014 1258 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05447 SFD O0 30942305 4250 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05448 SFD O0 30942218 4273 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05449 SFD O0 30942106 4287 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05450 SFDO0 30942207 4264 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05451 SFDO0 30942113 4231 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05452 SFDO0 30942121 3240 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05453 SFDO0 55605042020 1229 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05454 SFD O0 30942215 4249 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05455 SFD O0 30942304 4242 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05456 SFD O0 30942110 4255 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05457 SFDO0 30942204 4240 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05458 SFDO0 30942115 4215 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05459 SFDO0 30942117 3200 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05460 SFDO0 30942125 3280 Frontera Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05461 SFDO0 30942212 4225 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05462 SFD O0 30942301 4218 Hampton Way TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05463 SFD O0 55605042022 1249 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05467 SFD O0 55605042013 1268 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05468 SFD O0 55605042019 1219 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05469 SFD O0 55605042003 2368 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05470 SFD O0 55605042016 1238 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05471 SFD O0 55463410 1827 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05472 SFD O0 55605042023 1259 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05473 SFD O0 55605042015 1248 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05474 SFD O0 55463411 1807 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05475 SFD O0 55605042024 1269 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05476 SFD O0 55464401 1654 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05477 SFD O0 55605042001 2308 N Russell Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05478 SFD O0 55605042018 1218 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05479 SFD O0 31030016S05 4121 Flint AVE TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05480 SFD O0 55605042021 1239 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05481 SFD O0 55464402 1674 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05482 SFD O0 55464403 1694 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05486 SFD O0 55464404 1724 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05487 SFD O0 55464405 1744 San Marino Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-22-05488 SFD O0 31030016S07 3512 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-22-05490 SFD O0 30942507 3271 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05491 SFD O0 55943106S 1494 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05493 SFD O0 30944206 3351 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05494 SFD O0 55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05495 SFD O0 30944103 4423 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05496 SFD O0 30944226 4446 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05497 SFD O0 30943411 3350 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05498 SFD O0 30944231 4416 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05499 SFD O0 30942414 3250 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05500 SFD O0 30944203 3321 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05501 SFD O0 30943408 4337 Sussex Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05502 SFD O0 30944228 4434 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05503 SFD O0 30944106 4441 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05504 SFD O0 30943412 3340 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05505 SFD O0 30944105 4435 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05506 SFD O0 55610072 2002 N Perry Ln TM 6328 BD-CMBR-22-05509 SFD O0 55610073 2008 N Perry Ln TM 6328 BD-CMBR-22-05510 SFD O0 55610074 2014 N Perry Ln TM 6328 BD-CMBR-22-05511 SFD O0 55610075 2020 N Perry Ln TM 6328 BD-CMBR-22-05512 SFD O0 55610076 2026 N Perry Ln TM 6328 BD-CMBR-22-05513 SFD O0 55943109S 1464 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05515 SFD O0 55943110S 1454 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05516 SFD O0 3854
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30944225 4452 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05517 SFD O
0 30942508 3281 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05518 SFD O0 30942418 3290 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05519 SFD O0 55943323S 1455 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05520 SFD O0 30944202 3311 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05521 SFD O0 55943324S 1465 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05522 SFD O0 30944233 3322 Amistad Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05523 SFD O0 30942506 3261 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05524 SFD O0 55605042096 1252 Summerset Ave TM 6344 BD-CMBR-22-05525 SFD O0 30943415 3310 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05526 SFD O0 30944205 3341 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05529 SFD O0 30943409 4357 Sussex Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05530 SFD O0 55467014 4184 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05531 SFD O0 30944235 3302 Amistad Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05532 SFD O0 30944229 4428 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05534 SFD O0 30942416 3260 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05535 SFD O0 30944201 3301 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05537 SFD O0 55467017 4154 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05538 SFD O0 30944230 4422 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05539 SFD O0 55467018 4144 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05540 SFD O0 30944107 4447 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05541 SFD O0 30942505 3251 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05543 SFD O0 55467020 4124 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05544 SFD O0 30943413 3330 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05545 SFD O0 30944207 3361 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05546 SFD O0 30943407 4317 Sussex Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05547 SFD O0 55467021 4114 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05548 SFD O0 30944102 4417 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05549 SFD O0 55467023 4094 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05551 SFD O0 55467024 4084 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05552 SFD O0 30944227 4440 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05553 SFD O0 30942509 3291 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05555 SFD O0 55467025 1385 Junipero Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-22-05556 SFD O0 30942417 3280 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05557 SFD O0 30944204 3331 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05558 SFD O0 30943410 3360 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05559 SFD O0 30944234 3312 Amistad Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05560 SFD O0 30944232 4410 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05561 SFD O0 30944101 4411 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05562 SFD O0 30944104 4429 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05563 SFD O0 30944224 4458 Mecca Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-22-05564 SFD O0 55942003S 1697 Teague Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-05591 SFD O0 55941024S 1775 N Renn Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-05594 SFD O0 55941022S 1795 N Renn Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-05596 SFD O0 55942020S 1661 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-05599 SFD O0 55943101S 1508 Teague Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05600 SFD O0 55609007 2131 N Rogers Ln TM 6050 BD-CMBR-22-05605 SFD O0 55536235 2121 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05613 SFD O0 55536242 2000 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05614 SFD O0 55536246 2080 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05615 SFD O0 55536247 2100 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05616 SFD O0 55536248 2120 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05617 SFD O0 55536249 2140 Descanso Ave TM 6377 BD-CMBR-22-05618 SFD O0 55944032 2976 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05619 SFD O0 55944033 2966 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05620 SFD O0 55944034 2956 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05621 SFD O0 55944035 2946 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05622 SFD O0 55944036 2936 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05623 SFD O0 55944037 2926 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05624 SFD O0 55944038 2916 Trenton Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05625 SFD O0 55944043 2959 Teague Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05626 SFD O0 55944044 2969 Teague Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05627 SFD O0 55944045 2979 Teague Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05628 SFD O0 55944046 1607 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05629 SFD O0 55944047 1617 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05630 SFD O0 55944048 1627 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05631 SFD O0 55944049 1637 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05632 SFD O0 55944050 1647 N Megan Ave TM 6339 BD-CMBR-22-05633 SFD O0 55855002 1687 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05634 SFD O0 55855003 1677 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05636 SFD O0 55855004 1667 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05637 SFD O0 55855005 1657 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05638 SFD O0 55854001 1647 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05639 SFD O0 55854003 3242 Vermont Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05640 SFD O0 55854004 1669 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05641 SFD O0 55854005 1663 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05642 SFD O0 55854006 1657 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05643 SFD O0 55854007 1651 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05644 SFD O0 55854008 1645 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05645 SFD O0 55854009 1639 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05646 SFD O0 55854010 1633 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05647 SFD O0 55854011 1632 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05648 SFD O0 3855
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55854012 1638 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05649 SFD O 0 55854013 1644 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05650 SFD O0 55854014 1650 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05651 SFD O0 55854015 1656 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05652 SFD O0 55854016 1662 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05653 SFD O0 55855019 1668 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05654 SFD O0 55855018 1674 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05655 SFD O0 55855017 1680 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05656 SFD O0 55855016 1686 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-22-05657 SFD O0 55855015 1692 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00002 SFD O0 55855014 1698 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00004 SFD O0 55855020 1699 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00005 SFD O0 55855021 1693 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00006 SFD O0 55855022 1687 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00007 SFD O0 55855023 1681 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00009 SFD O0 55855024 1675 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00010 SFD O0 55855006 1658 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00011 SFD O0 55855007 1668 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00012 SFD O0 55855008 1678 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00013 SFD O0 55855009 1688 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00014 SFD O0 55855010 1698 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00015 SFD O0 55855011 3230 Loyola Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00016 SFD O0 55855012 3220 Loyola Ave TM 6389 BD-CMBR-23-00017 SFD O0 55936306 1643 N Ryan Ave TM 6109 BD-CMBR-23-00018 SFD O0 55939123 2694 Moody Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00019 SFD O0 55939124 2674 Moody Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00020 SFD O0 55939125 2654 Moody Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00021 SFD O0 55939126 1722 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00022 SFD O0 55939127 1732 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00027 SFD O0 55939128 1742 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00028 SFD O0 55939130 1731 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00031 SFD O0 55939131 1721 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00032 SFD O0 55939132 1711 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00033 SFD O0 55939133 1701 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00034 SFD O0 55939201 1700 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00035 SFD O0 55939202 1710 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00036 SFD O0 55939203 1720 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00037 SFD O0 55939204 1730 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00038 SFD O0 55939205 1740 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00039 SFD O0 55939206 1750 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00040 SFD O0 55939207 2611 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00041 SFD O0 55939208 2621 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00042 SFD O0 55939301 2641 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00043 SFD O0 55939302 2661 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00044 SFD O0 55939303 2681 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00045 SFD O0 55939304 1753 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00046 SFD O0 55939305 1743 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00047 SFD O0 55939306 1733 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00048 SFD O0 55939309 1754 N Park Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-00049 SFD O0 55942002S 1677 Teague Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-23-00179 SFD O0 30902252142 3205 Lourdes Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-00690 SFD O0 30902252141 3215 Lourdes Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-00691 SFD O0 55943202S 1568 Teague Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-01002 SFD O0 55943205S 1563 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-01004 SFDO0 55943210S 1519 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-01049 SFD O0 55943104S 1523 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-01052 SFDO0 55939310 2731 Loyola Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-01222 SFD O0 55463201 4187 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-01723 SFD O0
55463202 4177 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-01724 SFD O0
55463203 4167 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-01727 SFD O0
55463204 4157 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-01731 SFD O0
55463205 4147 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-01732 SFD O0
55939129 1741 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 BD-CMBR-23-01967 SFD O0 31030016S06 4111 Flint AVE TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-01990 SFD O0 31030016S08 3522 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02117 SFD O0 31030016S31 3533 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02118 SFD O0 31030016S10 3542 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02119 SFD O0 31030016S11 3552 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02120 SFD O0 31030016S30 3543 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02121 SFD O0 31030016S09 3532 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02122 SFD O0 31030016S32 3523 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02123 SFD O0 30902252002 4755 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02201 SFD O0 30902252003 4745 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02202 SFD O0 30902252004 4735 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02203 SFD O0 30902252005 4725 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02204 SFD O0 30902252012 4734 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02205 SFD O0 30902252013 4744 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02206 SFD O0 30902252014 4754 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02207 SFD O0 55463301 4056 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-02287 SFD O0
55463307 4136 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-02288 SFD O0
55463308 4146 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-02289 SFD O0
55463309 4156 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-02290 SFD O0
3856
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
31030016S22 3585 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02299 SFD O 0 31030016S18 4144 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02300 SFD O0 31030016S20 4164 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02308 SFD O0 31030016S23 3575 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02309 SFD O0 31030016S24 3565 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02310 SFD O0 31030016S25 4155 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02311 SFD O0 31030016S26 4145 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02312 SFD O0 31030016S27 4135 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02313 SFD O0 31030016S17 4134 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02314 SFD O0 31030016S21 4174 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02315 SFD O0 31030016S19 4154 Lansing Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02330 SFD O0 31030016S12 3562 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02331 SFD O0 31030016S13 3572 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02333 SFD O0 31030016S15 3592 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02336 SFD O0 31030016S28 3563 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02338 SFD O0 31030016S29 3553 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-02339 SFD O0 30902252006 4715 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02348 SFD O0 30902252007 4705 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02349 SFD O0 30902252008 3202 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02350 SFD O0 30902252009 3212 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02351 SFD O0 30902252104 4602 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02368 SFD O0 30902252105 4610 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02369 SFD O0 30902252106 4618 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02370 SFD O0 30902252107 4626 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02371 SFD O0 30902252097 4651 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02380 SFD O0 30902252098 4643 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02381 SFD O0 30902252099 4635 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02382 SFD O0 30902252108 4634 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02383 SFD O0 30902252109 4642 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02384 SFD O0 30902252110 4650 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02385 SFD O0 30902252010 3222 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02390 SFD O0 30902252011 4724 Buckingham Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02391 SFD O0 30902252020 4727 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02392 SFD O0 30902252021 3232 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02393 SFD O0 6413010000 4011 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02602 SFD O0 6413030000 4002 Scott Ave BD-CMBR-23-02604 SFD O0
6413040000 4012 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02605 SFD O0 6413050000 4022 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02607 SFD O0 6413060000 4032 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02608 SFD O0 6413120000 1650 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02609 SFD O0 6413260000 1653 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02610 SFDO0 6413330000 4143 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02611 SFD O0 6413560000 4186 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-02612 SFD O0 30902252017 4757 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02628 SFD O0 30902252019 4737 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02630 SFD O0 30902252026 4736 Hampton Way BD-CMBR-23-02631 SFD O0
30902252027 4746 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02632 SFD O0 30902252028 4756 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02644 SFD O0 55465203 1458 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-23-02688 SFD O0 55465206 1428 Junipero Ave TM 6304 BD-CMBR-23-02690 SFD O0 55467022 4104 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-02695 SFD O0 55467026 1375 Junipero Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-02703 SFD O0 30902252023 3252 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02855 SFD O0 30902252024 3262 Simental Ave BD-CMBR-23-02856 SFD O0
30902252025 4726 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02857 SFD O0 30902252034 4719 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02858 SFD O0 30902252035 3272 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02860 SFD O0 30902252036 3282 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02861 SFD O0 30902252093 4683 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02862 SFD O0 30902252094 4675 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02864 SFD O0 30902252095 4667 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02865 SFD O0 30902252096 4659 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02867 SFD O0 30902252111 4658 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02868 SFD O0 30902252112 4666 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02878 SFD O0 30902252113 4674 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02881 SFD O0 30902252114 4682 Sussex Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-02882 SFD O0 56017030 1237 N Cindy Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-23-02925 SFD O0 30902252092 3308 Escalante Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03006 SFD O0 30902252091 3318 Escalante Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03007 SFD O0 30902252090 3328 Escalante Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03010 SFD O0 30902252089 3338 Escalante Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03012 SFD O0 30902252088 3348 Escalante Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03013 SFD O0 30902252068 4638 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03014 SFD O0 30902252069 4631 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03015 SFD O0 56017032 584 W Kenosha Ave TM 6348 BD-CMBR-23-03054 SFD O0 30902252022 3242 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03125 SFD O0 6413110000 1670 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03153 SFD O0 6413270000 1673 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03158 SFDO0 6413320000 4133 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03159 SFD O0 6413570000 4176 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03160 SFD O0 6413580000 4166 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03186 SFD O0 6413590000 4156 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03187 SFD O0 3857
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6413610000 4136 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03188 SFD O 0 6413620000 4126 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03189 SFD O0 6413630000 4116 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03190 SFD O0 6413600000 4146 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03195 SFD O0 31030016S14 3582 San Marino Ave TM 6208 BD-CMBR-23-03275 SFD O0 30902252070 4641 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03354 SFD O0 30902252071 4651 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03355 SFD O0 30902252081 4670 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03356 SFD O0 30902252082 4660 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03357 SFD O0 30902252083 4650 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03358 SFD O0 30902252084 4640 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03360 SFD O0 30902252031 4749 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03446 SFD O0 30902252033 4729 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03448 SFD O0 30902252040 4728 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03449 SFD O0 30902252041 4738 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03450 SFD O0 30902252042 4748 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03451 SFD O0 30902252037 3302 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03452 SFD O0 30902252038 3312 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03453 SFD O0 30902252039 4718 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03454 SFD O0 30902252048 4721 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03455 SFD O0 30902252072 4661 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03474 SFD O0 30946211 3339 Escobedo Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03476 SFD O0 30902252078 3349 Escobedo Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03486 SFD O0 30902252080 4680 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03487 SFD O0 30902252079 4690 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03493 SFD O0 30902252064 4678 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03538 SFD O0 30946102 4668 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03539 SFDO0 30902252067 4648 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03541 SFD O0 6413070000 4063 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03605 SFD O0 6413090000 1710 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03607 SFD O0 6413290000 1713 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03609 SFDO0 6413300000 1733 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03610 SFDO0 6413280000 1693 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03611 SFDO0 30902252073 4671 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03679 SFD O0 30902252018 4747 Hampton Way TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03681 SFD O0 6413080000 1730 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03688 SFD O0 6413100000 1690 La Canada Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-03689 SFD O0 30902252138 3245 Lourdes Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03698 SFD O0 6413020000 4001 Scott Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03701 SFD O0 6413130000 1651 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03729 SFD O0 6413150000 1691 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03730 SFD O0 6413170000 1731 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03731 SFD O0 6413180000 4083 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03732 SFD O0 6413190000 4093 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03733 SFD O0 6413200000 4103 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03734 SFD O0 55943402S 1384 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-03774 SFD O0 55467008 4183 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03787 SFD O0 55467009 4193 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03788 SFD O0 55467010 1407 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03790 SFD O0 55467011 1417 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03791 SFD O0 55467012 1427 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03792 SFD O0 55467013 1437 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-03793 SFD O0 6413310000 4123 Keats Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03795 SFD O0 6413160000 1711 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03929 SFD O0 6413220000 1712 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03930 SFDO0 6413230000 1692 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03932 SFDO0 6413250000 1652 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-03933 SFDO0 55467039 4113 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04138 SFD O0 6413140000 1671 La Canada Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04148 SFD O0 6413210000 1732 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04149 SFDO0 6413240000 1672 Hermosa Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04150 SFDO0 55943403S 1520 Enterprise Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-04287 SFD O0 55464101 1801 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04315 SFD O0 55464102 1811 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04316 SFD O0 55463101 1831 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04317 SFD O0 55463102 1841 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04318 SFD O0 55463104 1871 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04320 SFD O0 55463105 1881 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04322 SFD O0 55467051 4102 Mitchell Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04323 SFD O0 30902252046 4741 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04377 SFD O0 30902252056 4750 Joaquin Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04378 SFD O0 55463209 4107 Poe Ave TM 6123 BD-CMBR-23-04391 SFD O0
6413640000 4106 Twain Ave TM 6413 BD-CMBR-23-04392 SFD O0 55467047 4142 Mitchell Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04393 SFD O0 55467037 4093 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04540 SFD O0 30943216 4252 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04562 SFDO0 30943211 4212 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04563 SFDO0 30943218 4268 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04564 SFDO0 30943214 4236 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04565 SFDO0 30943212 4220 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04566 SFDO0 30943215 4244 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04585 SFDO0 30943220 4284 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04600 SFDO0 3858
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30943219 4276 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04601 SFD O 0 30943213 4228 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04604 SFD O 0 55463103 1851 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182 BD-CMBR-23-04605 SFD O 0 30943217 4260 Bellaire Ave TM 6023 BD-CMBR-23-04606 SFD O 0 55467040 4123 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04640 SFD O 0 55467046 4152 Mitchell Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04641 SFD O 0 30946203 3322 Simental Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-04701 SFD O 0 55467050 4112 Mitchell Ave TM 6404 BD-CMBR-23-04731 SFD O 0 56408024 1187 N Holly Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04794 SFD O 0 56408018 1196 N Holly Ave TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04797 SFD O 0 5590110865 1754 Lester Ave TM 6154 CMBR-001403-2020 SFD O 0 5560503803 2091 N Rogers Ln TM 6050 CMBR-005473-2020 SFD O 0 57124404S 2669 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05228 SFD O 0 55943302S 1542 Richmond Ave TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05232 SFD O 0 57124305S 4330 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05233 SFD O 0 57124216S 4371 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05234 SFD O 0 57124110S 2602 Highland Ave TM 6166 BD-CMBR-22-05235 SFD O 0 55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave B TM 6284 BD-CMBR-23-04766 ADU R 0 56408024 1187 N Holly Ave B TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04796 ADU R 0 56408018 1196 N Holly Ave B TM 6367 BD-CMBR-23-04798 ADU R 0 49209615 148 Acacia Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-03654 ADU R 0 49937314 2531 Bundy Ave BD-CMBR-23-02458 ADU R 0
43030251 514 W Pico Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-01417 ADU R 0 55844025 1291 N Whitmore Ave B TM 5472 BD-CMBR-22-01987 ADU R 0 30946103 4658 Bellaire Ave TM 6161 BD-CMBR-23-03540 ADU R 0 41037201 109 N Cindy Ave B BD-CMBR-23-02542 ADU R 0
41031302 73 N Willow Ave NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-03703 ADU R 0 49211214 261 Minnewawa Ave B BD-CMBR-23-00605 ADU R 0
55311205 2652 Fremont Ave BD-CMBR-23-00737 ADU R 0
56108111 957 N Citadel Ave B BD-CMBR-23-00486 ADU R 0
49119223 1514 Gibson Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-01418 ADU R 0 49207202 120 Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-04256 ADU R 0 49106171 227 W Sierra Ave B BD-CMBR-22-05164 ADU R 0
49106171 227 W Sierra Ave C BD-CMBR-22-05167 ADU R 0
49106171 237 Sierra Ave B BD-CMBR-22-05172 ADU R 0
49106171 237 Sierra Ave C BD-CMBR-22-05174 ADU R 0
41053104 281 N Terry Ave B BD-CMBR-22-05070 ADU R 0
56010008 1783 N Bush Ave TM 4912 BD-CMBR-22-03783 ADU R 0 49137001 22 N Villa Ave B BD-CMBR-22-05218 ADU R 0
49137001 22 N Villa Ave C BD-CMBR-22-05219 ADU R 0
49137002 18 N Villa Ave B BD-CMBR-22-05215 ADU R 0
49137002 18 N Villa Ave C BD-CMBR-22-05216 ADU R 0
49113103 80 N Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-23-00333 ADU R 0 49118422 1743 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-04422 ADU R 0 49118416 1729 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-04420 ADU R 0 55943105S 1513 Richmond Ave B TM 6284 BD-CMBR-22-05220 ADU R 0 55941020S 1744 Lester Ave B TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01937 ADU R 0 49117107 1470 Fourth St B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-00871 ADU R 0 49117122 1476 Fourth St B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-22-00873 ADU R 0 55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-22-01307 ADU R 0 49821334 1113 Carey Ave NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-21-05355 ADU R 0 49906021 329 W Rialto Ave B NO PROJECT BD-CMBR-21-05616 ADU R 0 55933016 2017 Teague Ave TM 5550 BD-CMBR-21-04378 ADU R 0 55940007S 1940 N Ezie Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-21-01118 ADU R 0 55941018S 1762 Lester Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-21-00861 ADU R 0 55941006S 1765 N Bundy Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-21-00477 ADU R 0 55940008S 1919 N Ezie Ave TM 6154 BD-CMBR-21-00475 ADU R 0 49212215 253 Minnewawa PM2023-003 PM2023-003 SFD O 4 7/21/2023 4 56314253 1491 Alluvial MFRDR2023-001 MFRDR2023-001 5+ R 12 8/10/2023 12 0 0
0 0
3859
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 8 9
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
0 8 0 8 0 9 592 617
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy Bld 34 SPR 2018-011 0
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3601 SPR 2018-011 0
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3501 SPR 2018-011 0
43060101 784 W Holland Ave RHNA 2019-001 0
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy SPR 2018-011 0
55534322 3072 De Wolf Ave 0
55926019S 1808 N Carson Ave TM 5122 0
55926011S 1807 N Coventry Ave TM 5122 0
49207202 120 Woodworth Ave 0
55851007 3076 Lester Ave PM 2018-011 0
49215215 356 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 0
49215215 360 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 0
49209820 156 Sunnyside Ave 1 9/13/2023 1
5612601740 421 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 0
5612601751 436 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601059 563 N Citadel Ln TM 6262 0
56129044 472 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129043 468 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129042 464 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129041 460 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601755 456 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601051 557 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129045 476 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601754 452 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601753 448 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
5612601752 440 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129064 561 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129063 565 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129062 569 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129061 573 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129060 574 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129059 570 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129058 566 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129057 562 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129056 558 N Terry Ln TM 6262 0
56129055 559 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56129054 563 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56129053 567 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56128065 576 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56129052 571 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56129050 496 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129049 492 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129048 488 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56128064 572 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56129047 484 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129046 480 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 0
56129051 575 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56128061 560 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56128062 564 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56128063 568 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 0
56128060 561 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262 0
7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 3860
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56128057 573 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128059 565 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128056 577 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128058 569 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128020 516 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128019 512 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128018 508 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128017 504 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128016 500 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 55609012 607 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 56128024 532 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128025 536 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128055 578 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128054 574 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128053 570 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128052 566 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128051 562 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
0 56128021 520 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128023 528 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128022 524 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128010 510 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128009 514 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128008 518 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 55609050 545 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 56128007 522 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 556128006 526 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127035 598 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127034 602 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127028 626 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127033 606 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127032 610 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127031 614 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127030 618 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127027 630 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127029 622 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127026 634 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127025 638 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127024 642 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127023 646 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127022 652 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127021 656 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 5590517613 2773 Vermont Ave TM 6301
0 55609009 667 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609057 405 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 56127006 568 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127007 572 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127008 576 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127009 580 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127010 584 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127011 583 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127012 579 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127013 575 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127014 571 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127015 567 N Adler Ln TM 6262
0 56127036 590 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127037 586 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127038 582 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127039 578 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127040 574 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56127016 566 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56127017 570 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56127018 574 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56127019 578 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56127020 582 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 55609054 465 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 56127005 596 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56127004 592 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56127003 588 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56127002 584 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56127001 580 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 3861
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56128001 546 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128002 542 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128003 538 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128005 530 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128050 563 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128049 567 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128048 571 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128047 575 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128046 579 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128026 540 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128027 544 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128028 548 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128029 552 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128030 556 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128040 565 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56128039 569 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56128038 573 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56128037 577 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56128036 581 N Helm Ln TM 6262
0 56128041 564 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128042 568 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128043 572 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128044 576 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128045 580 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
0 56128031 560 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128032 564 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128033 568 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128034 572 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128035 576 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
0 56128070 554 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128069 558 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128068 562 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128067 566 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 56128066 570 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
0 55609087 401 Vintage Ln TM 6050
0 5590504141 2939 Teague Ave TM 6339
0 5590517619 1745 N Park Ave TM 6301
0 5590517620 1735 N Park Ave TM 6301
0 5590517654 2741 Loyola Ave TM 6301
0 5590517655 2751 Loyola Ave TM 6301
0 5590517624 2704 Moody Ave TM 6301
0 5590504131 2997 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 5590504115 1677 N Megan Ave TM 6339
0 5590504112 2965 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504113 2975 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504111 2955 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504114 1687 N Megan Ave TM 6339
0 5540402010 3075 Keats Ave TM 6349
0 5590504109 2935 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504108 2925 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504110 2945 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 56052050S 984 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052049S 976 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052033S 985 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052034S 977 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052048S 968 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052047S 960 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052035S 969 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052036S 961 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052046S 952 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 55612013 501 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612012 513 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612011 525 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612010 537 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612009 549 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 3862
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55612008 561 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612007 603 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612006 615 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612005 627 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612004 639 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612003 651 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55612002 663 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
0 55942038S 1684 N Shirley Ave TM 6154
0 55609017 507 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609013 587 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609016 527 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609015 547 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609014 567 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 5590504107 2915 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504106 2905 Vermont Ave TM 6339
0 5590504105 1694 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339
0 5590504103 1674 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339
0 55609026 2120 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609027 2110 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609028 2100 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609029 2090 N Perry Ln TM 6050 1 6/5/2023 1
55609030 2080 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609025 2130 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609024 2140 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609023 2150 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609022 407 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609021 427 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609020 447 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609019 467 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609018 487 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
0 55939119 1725 N Park Ave TM 6301
0 55939308 1744 N Park Ave TM 6301
0 55464302 1676 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 56052042S 920 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052044S 936 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052040S 929 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052032S 988 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052025S 932 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052029S 964 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052031S 980 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052028S 956 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052024S 924 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052026S 940 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052043s 928 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052045S 944 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052037S 953 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052039S 937 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052030S 972 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052027S 948 Serena Ave TM 6263
0 56052041S 921 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 56052038S 945 Everglade Ave TM 6263
0 55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 55940015S 1765 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 55942004S 1787 Teague Ave TM 6154
0 55942018S 1730 Trenton Ave TM 6154
0 55465718 4176 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 56408019 1186 N Holly Ave TM 6367
0 56017029 1247 N Cindy Ave TM 6348
0 55465303 4085 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465304 4095 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465306 4115 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465308 4135 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465309 4145 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465310 4155 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 3863
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55465311 4165 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465312 4175 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55465314 4195 Dennis Ave TM 6304
0 55938201 2613 Vermont Ave TM 6209
0 55941020S 1744 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 55941007S 1766 N Renn Ave TM 6154
0 56408020 1176 N Holly Ave TM 6367
0 56408025 1197 N Holly Ave TM 6367
0 55464502 4161 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464503 4151 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464504 4141 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464505 4131 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464506 4121 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464507 4111 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464508 4101 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464509 4091 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464510 4081 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55536236 2101 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536250 2160 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536238 2061 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536234 2141 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 5582900601 1697 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55612033 2006 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612032 2012 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612031 2018 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612030 2024 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 31030016S37 3555 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S38 3545 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S39 3535 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S40 3525 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S41 3515 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S43 3505 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
0 56017028 1257 N Cindy Ave TM 6348
0 55612034 2005 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612035 2011 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612036 2017 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55612037 2023 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
0 55464511 4071 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464512 4061 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464513 4051 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464514 4041 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464515 4031 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55464516 4021 Scott Ave TM 6123
0 55609075 641 Vintage Ln TM 6050
0 55609074 661 Vintage Ln TM 6050
0 55609073 681 Vintage Ln TM 6050
0 55609072 682 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609071 662 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 55609070 642 Bloom Ln TM 6050
0 55536245 2060 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536231 2067 Amanecer Ave TM 6025
0 55536202 2087 Amanecer Ave TM 6025
0 55536203 3801 Fairmont Ave TM 6025
0 55536204 3809 Fairmont Ave TM 6025
0 55536205 3817 Fairmont Ave TM 6025
0 55611034 500 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55464201 1797 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55464202 1777 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55464203 1757 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55464204 1737 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55464205 1717 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55465401 1447 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55465402 1457 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 3864
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55465403 1467 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55465404 1477 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55465405 1487 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55465406 1497 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55611037 536 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611036 524 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611035 512 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611038 548 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611039 560 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611040 602 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611041 614 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55536237 2081 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536240 2021 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536239 2041 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 5540402003 3026 Keats Ave TM 6349
0 55536241 2001 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55611042 626 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611043 638 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611044 650 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 55611045 662 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
0 5590210330 1522 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 5590210305 1513 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 5590210332 1562 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 55611031 2058 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611032 2052 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611029 2065 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611028 2059 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611026 2047 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611033 2046 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55611030 2064 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 5590210333 1528 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
0 55942037S 1694 N Shirley Ave TM 6154
0 55611027 2053 N Ralph Ln TM 6329
0 55536244 2040 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536243 2020 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 55536233 2161 Descanso Ave TM 6377
0 5590210322 1583 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 55464306 4183 Keats Ave TM 6123
0 55464307 4173 Keats Ave TM 6123
0 55464308 4163 Keats Ave TM 6123
0 55611022 2058 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55611023 2052 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55611024 2046 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55943209S 1529 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
0 55943211S 1509 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
0 55611018 2041 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55611019 2047 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55611020 2053 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55611021 2059 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55464309 1745 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464310 1725 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464311 1695 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464312 1675 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464313 1655 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55465205 1438 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55611025 2040 N Hammel Ln TM 6329
0 55461014S 3808 Portals Ave TM 6254
0 55461015S 3849 Portals Ave TM 6254
0 55943206S 1573 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 55943208S 1593 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 55465101 1598 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55465102 1578 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55465103 1550 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304
0 3865
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55465104 1530 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304
0 55465201 1478 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55465202 1468 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55465204 1448 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 55465207 1418 Junipero Ave TM 6304
0 5560504166 2220 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55465407 4198 Beverly Ave TM 6304
0 5560504181 2283 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 4/21/20231
5560504172 2211 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55465408 4188 Beverly Ave TM 6304
0 5560504170 1076 Windmill Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
5560504173 2219 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
5560504179 2267 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/20/20231
5560504163 2280 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55465409 4178 Beverly Ave TM 6304
0 5560504167 2200 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55465410 4179 San Jose Ave TM 6304
0 55465411 4189 San Jose Ave TM 6304
0 5560504176 2243 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/20/20231
55465412 4199 San Jose Ave TM 6304
0 55605042050 1216 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55465413 1567 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55605042045 2232 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042058 2203 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023 1
55605042062 2235 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023 1
55465414 1577 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55465415 1587 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304
0 55605042052 1256 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55605042056 1346 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55943203S 1548 Teague Ave TM 6284
1 12/29/20231
55605042041 2264 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042067 2275 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/13/20231
55605042038 2288 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 4/13/20231
55605042044 2240 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042064 2251 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/12/20231
55605042039 2280 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 4/20/20231
55605042048 2208 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55605042055 1326 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55605042060 2219 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/8/20231
55605041137 1052 Springtime Ave TM 6292
1 4/21/20231
55605041136 1046 Springtime Ave TM 6292
1 4/21/20231
5560504164 2260 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
5560504175 2235 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
5560504169 1066 Windmill Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
5560504182 2291 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 4/21/20231
5560504168 1056 Windmill Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
5560504165 2240 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
5560504171 2203 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
5560504174 2227 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/20/20231
5560504177 2251 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/20/20231
5560504180 2275 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 6/20/20231
5560504185 2375 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
1 5/15/20231
55605041169 1030 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55605041175 1066 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 5/15/20231
5560504191 1055 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 5/15/20231
5560504197 1019 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
55605041104 2364 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55605041148 1016 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
5560504188 1073 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 5/15/20231
5560504195 1031 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/29/20231
55605041100 2396 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55605041164 1021 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
55605041172 1048 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/19/20231
3866
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
5560504189 1067 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/2/20231
5560504196 1025 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/15/2023
0 55605041165 1015 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 6/15/2023
0 5560504184 2345 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504199 1007 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/13/2023
0 55605041139 1053 Springtime Ave TM 6292 4/21/2023
0 30942203 4232 Buckingham Ave TM 6023 5/15/2023
0 55605041177 1078 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504186 1085 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504193 1043 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 49106171 227 W Sierra Ave 3/29/2023
0 55605041102 2380 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 6/13/2023
0 55605041105 2356 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 6/13/2023
0 55605041147 1010 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 6/13/2023
0 55605041167 1018 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/16/2023
0 55605041173 1054 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504192 1049 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 49106171 237 W Sierra Ave PM 2022-002 3/29/2023
0 55605041103 2372 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 6/15/2023
0 55605041149 1022 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 6/15/2023
0 55605041168 1024 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/16/2023
0 55605041176 1072 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504187 1079 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/2/2023
0 5560504194 1037 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/15/2023
0 55605041101 2388 N Phillip Ave TM 6292 6/19/2023
0 55605041174 1060 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504183 2315 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 5/15/2023
0 5560504190 1061 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 5/25/2023
0 5560504178 2259 N Argyle Ave TM 6292 6/20/2023
0 5560504198 1013 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/16/2023
0 55605041138 1059 Springtime Ave TM 6292 4/21/2023
0 55605041166 1009 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292 6/19/2023
0 55605041170 1036 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292 6/19/2023
0 57124106S 2682 Highland Ave TM 6166 4/27/2023
0 57124310S 4280 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 5/25/2023
0 57124213S 4341 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 6/2/2023
0 57124403S 2649 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 6/2/2023
0 57124109S 2622 Highland Ave TM 6166 3/30/2023
0 55605042094 2233 N Russell Ave TM 6344 6/13/2023
0 57124203S 4241 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 5/11/2023
0 57124209S 4301 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 5/25/2023
0 57124306S 4320 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 6/5/2023
0 57124302S 4360 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 6/5/2023
0 57124108S 2642 Highland Ave TM 6166 4/25/2023
0 57124315S 4230 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 4/27/2023
0 57124204S 4251 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 5/11/2023
0 49137002 18 N Villa Ave 2/7/2023
0 49137001 22 N Villa Ave 2/7/2023
0 57124208S 4291 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 5/25/2023
0 57124307S 4310 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124104S 2722 Highland Ave TM 6166
0 57124311S 4270 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124212S 4331 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124303S 4350 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 6/1/2023 100000 57124201S 4221 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124312S 4260 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124207S 4281 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124313S 4250 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 3867
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
57124210S 4311 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 55943306S 1508 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 1 11/3/2023 1
57124405S 2689 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 1 5/30/2023 1
57124105S 2702 Highland Ave TM 6166
0 57124316S 4220 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124205S 4261 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124308S 4300 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 5/30/20231
57124214S 4351 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 5/30/20231
57124301S 4370 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 6/2/20231
57124401S 2609 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
1 6/2/20231
57124103S 2742 Highland Ave TM 6166
1 4/25/20231
57124202S 4231 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 3/30/2023 1
57124215S 4361 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 6/2/2023 1
57124304S 4340 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 6/2/2023 1
57124107S 2662 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 4/25/2023 1
57124314S 4240 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 4/25/2023 1
57124206S 4271 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 5/15/2023 1
57124309S 4290 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 5/30/2023 1
57124211S 4321 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 5/30/2023 1
57124402S 2629 La Mirada Ave TM 6166 1 6/5/2023 1
55605042005 1217 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
1 4/24/20231
55605042074 2258 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55605042077 1319 Summerset Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55605042082 2220 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55605042095 1234 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023
1 55605042087 1305 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55605042009 1257 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042033 2273 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042027 2274 N Elm Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55605042070 1318 Springtime Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55605042101 1328 Summerset Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55611001 2041 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/9/20231
55611002 2045 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/9/20231
55611003 2049 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/9/20231
55611004 2053 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/9/20231
55611005 2057 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/9/20231
55611006 2056 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55611007 2052 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55611008 2048 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55611009 2044 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55611010 2043 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 3/9/20231
55611011 2049 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 3/9/20231
55611012 2055 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 3/9/20231
55611013 2061 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 3/9/20231
55611014 2060 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 2/17/20231
55611015 2054 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 2/17/20231
55611016 2048 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 2/17/20231
55611017 2042 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 2/17/20231
55611046 712 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55612001 713 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 5/16/20231
55612038 2020 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 3/23/20231
55612039 2016 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 3/23/20231
55612040 2012 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 3/23/20231
55612041 2008 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 3/23/20231
55943201S 1578 Teague Ave TM 6284
1 11/3/20231
55612042 2009 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 4/12/20231
55605042093 2225 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55612043 2013 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 4/12/20231
55612044 2017 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 4/12/20231
55612045 2021 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 4/12/20231
55612046 2025 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/1/20231
55605042084 1329 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55612047 2029 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 5/1/20231
3868
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55605042012 1287 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042034 2281 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042026 2282 N Elm Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55605042069 1310 Springtime Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55605042100 1320 Summerset Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
55605042085 1321 Windmill Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042088 1271 Windmill Ave TM 6344 1 6/13/2023 1
55605042008 1247 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 4/20/2023 1
55611048 2033 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 5/1/2023 1
55611047 2037 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 5/1/2023 1
55605042031 2257 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042078 1311 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
30942417 3270 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
55605042090 1235 Windmill Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042025 2290 N Elm Ave TM 6344 1 5/15/2023 1
55605042072 2272 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 5/30/2023 1
55605042080 2236 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042089 1253 Windmill Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042006 1227 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 4/24/2023 1
55605042036 2297 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042028 2266 N Elm Ave TM 6344 1 5/15/2023 1
55605042079 1303 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042099 1312 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023 1
55605042091 2209 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042010 1267 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042076 1327 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042097 1270 Summerset Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
55605042004 1207 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 4/24/2023 1
55605042035 2289 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
31030016S02 4151 Flint AVE TM 6208
0 55605042030 2250 N Elm Ave TM 6344 1 5/15/2023 1
55605042068 1302 Springtime Ave TM 6344 1 5/15/2023 1
55605042075 2250 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/6/2023 1
31030016S33 4132 Flint Ave TM 6208
0 55605042083 2212 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/13/2023 1
31030016S34 4142 Flint Ave TM 6208
0 55605042007 1237 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 4/24/2023 1
55605042032 2265 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55463401 4176 Poe Ave TM 6123
0 55605042029 2258 N Elm Ave TM 6344 1 5/15/2023 1
55605042071 1326 Springtime Ave TM 6344 1 5/30/2023 1
55605042092 2217 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 6/13/2023 1
55605042011 1277 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042073 2266 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 5/30/2023 1
55463402 4186 Poe Ave TM 6123
0 55605042081 2228 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/13/20231
55854002 3252 Vermont Ave TM 6389
1 10/12/20231
55605042098 1304 Summerset Ave TM 6344
1 6/13/20231
55605042086 1313 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 6/13/20231
55605042046 2224 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042042 2256 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042053 1276 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
55605042061 2227 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/8/20231
55605042037 2296 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 4/13/20231
55605042051 1236 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
55605042057 1366 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 6/8/20231
30943414 3320 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 6/20/2023 1
55605042065 2259 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023 1
55605042063 2243 N Duke Ave TM 6344 1 6/8/2023 1
55463403 1977 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55605042040 2272 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 4/20/2023 1
55463404 1957 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55463405 1937 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 3869
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55463406 1917 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 31030016S35 4152 Flint Ave TM 6208
0 55463407 1887 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 31030016S36 4162 Flint Ave TM 6208
0 55463408 1867 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 31030016S04 4131 Flint AVE TM 6208
0 55463409 1847 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55605042047 2216 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042059 2211 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/8/20231
55605042043 2248 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
55605042049 1206 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/15/20231
30942210 4288 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/21/20231
55605042054 1306 Windmill Ave TM 6344
1 5/30/20231
30942109 4263 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
30942205 4248 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
30942114 4223 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
55605042066 2267 N Duke Ave TM 6344
1 6/8/20231
55605041171 1042 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
1 6/16/20231
30942118 3210 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 6/2/20231
30942126 3290 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942211 4217 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942306 4258 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/5/20231
30942107 4279 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942208 4272 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/21/20231
30942112 4239 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
30942201 4216 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/15/20231
30942120 3230 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942123 3260 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942303 4234 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942214 4241 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942217 4265 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
55605042002 2338 N Russell Ave TM 6344
1 4/21/20231
30942108 4271 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942111 4247 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942202 4224 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/15/20231
30942122 3250 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942124 3270 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942302 4226 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942216 4257 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
55605042017 1228 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
1 4/21/20231
30942209 4280 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/21/20231
30942206 4256 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942116 4207 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 6/1/20231
30942119 3220 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942213 4233 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
55605042014 1258 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
30942305 4250 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942218 4273 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942106 4287 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/21/20231
30942207 4264 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942113 4231 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
30942121 3240 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/25/20231
55605042020 1229 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
30942215 4249 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942304 4242 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/6/20231
30942110 4255 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30942204 4240 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 5/15/20231
30942115 4215 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
1 6/1/20231
30942117 3200 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 6/1/20231
30942125 3280 Frontera Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942212 4225 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942301 4218 Hampton Way TM 6023
1 6/5/20231
55605042022 1249 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
1 5/11/20231
3870
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55605042013 1268 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042019 1219 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042003 2368 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 4/21/2023 1
55605042016 1238 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55463410 1827 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55605042023 1259 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55605042015 1248 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55463411 1807 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
0 55605042024 1269 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55464401 1654 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55605042001 2308 N Russell Ave TM 6344 1 4/21/2023 1
55605042018 1218 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344 1 4/21/2023 1
31030016S05 4121 Flint AVE TM 6208
0 55605042021 1239 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344 1 5/11/2023 1
55464402 1674 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464403 1694 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464404 1724 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 55464405 1744 San Marino Ave TM 6123
0 31030016S07 3512 San Marino Ave TM 6208
0 30942507 3271 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/21/2023 1
55943106S 1494 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
0 30944206 3351 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
1 5/15/20231
55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 12/20/20231
30944103 4423 Mecca Ave TM 6023
1 6/5/20231
30944226 4446 Mecca Ave TM 6023
1 6/2/20231
30943411 3350 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 6/1/2023 1
30944231 4416 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30942414 3250 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
30944203 3321 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 5/11/2023 1
30943408 4337 Sussex Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30944228 4434 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/2/2023 1
30944106 4441 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/5/2023 1
30943412 3340 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 6/1/2023 1
30944105 4435 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/5/2023 1
55610072 2002 N Perry Ln TM 6328 1 5/22/2023 1
55610073 2008 N Perry Ln TM 6328 1 5/22/2023 1
55610074 2014 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 5/22/20231
55610075 2020 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 5/22/20231
55610076 2026 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 5/22/20231
55943109S 1464 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 3/9/20231
55943110S 1454 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 3/8/20231
30944225 4452 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/2/2023 1
30942508 3281 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/21/2023 1
30942418 3290 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
55943323S 1455 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 1 11/3/2023 1
30944202 3311 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 5/11/2023 1
55943324S 1465 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 1 3/9/2023 1
30944233 3322 Amistad Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30942506 3261 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
1 4/21/20231
55605042096 1252 Summerset Ave TM 6344
1 6/6/20231
30943415 3310 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
1 5/11/20231
30944205 3341 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 5/15/2023 1
30943409 4357 Sussex Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
55467014 4184 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30944235 3302 Amistad Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30944229 4428 Mecca Ave TM 6023
1 5/30/20231
30942416 3260 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
30944201 3301 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
1 4/20/20231
55467017 4154 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30944230 4422 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
55467018 4144 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30944107 4447 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/5/2023 1
30942505 3251 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
3871
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55467020 4124 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30943413 3330 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 5/11/2023 1
30944207 3361 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 6/1/2023 1
30943407 4317 Sussex Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
55467021 4114 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30944102 4417 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/2/2023 1
55467023 4094 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 55467024 4084 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30944227 4440 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/2/2023 1
30942509 3291 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
55467025 1385 Junipero Ave TM 6404
0 30942417 3280 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 4/20/2023 1
30944204 3331 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 5/15/2023 1
30943410 3360 La Mirada Ave TM 6023 1 6/1/2023 1
30944234 3312 Amistad Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30944232 4410 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30944101 4411 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 5/30/2023 1
30944104 4429 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/5/2023 1
30944224 4458 Mecca Ave TM 6023 1 6/2/2023 1
55942003S 1697 Teague Ave TM 6154 1 2/9/2023 1
55941024S 1775 N Renn Ave TM 6154 1 5/19/2023 1
55941022S 1795 N Renn Ave TM 6154 1 9/22/2023 1
55942020S 1661 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 1 7/10/2023 1
55943101S 1508 Teague Ave TM 6284 1 3/20/2023 1
55609007 2131 N Rogers Ln TM 6050 1 6/21/2023 1
55536235 2121 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 3/24/2023 1
55536242 2000 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 3/24/2023 1
55536246 2080 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 5/17/2023 1
55536247 2100 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 5/17/2023 1
55536248 2120 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 5/17/2023 1
55536249 2140 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 5/2/2023 1
55944032 2976 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944033 2966 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944034 2956 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944035 2946 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944036 2936 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944037 2926 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944038 2916 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944043 2959 Teague Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944044 2969 Teague Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944045 2979 Teague Ave TM 6339
1 12/14/20231
55944046 1607 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/27/20231
55944047 1617 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/27/20231
55944048 1627 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/27/20231
55944049 1637 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/27/20231
55944050 1647 N Megan Ave TM 6339 1 4/27/2023 1
55855002 1687 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855003 1677 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 10/12/20231
55855004 1667 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855005 1657 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854001 1647 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 10/12/20231
55854003 3242 Vermont Ave TM 6389
1 5/4/20231
55854004 1669 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854005 1663 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854006 1657 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854007 1651 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854008 1645 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854009 1639 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854010 1633 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854011 1632 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854012 1638 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854013 1644 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854014 1650 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
3872
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55854015 1656 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55854016 1662 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855019 1668 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855018 1674 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855017 1680 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855016 1686 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855015 1692 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855014 1698 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855020 1699 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855021 1693 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855022 1687 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855023 1681 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855024 1675 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855006 1658 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 11/9/20231
55855007 1668 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 10/12/20231
55855008 1678 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 11/9/20231
55855009 1688 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 11/9/20231
55855010 1698 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
1 11/9/20231
55855011 3230 Loyola Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55855012 3220 Loyola Ave TM 6389
1 12/14/20231
55936306 1643 N Ryan Ave TM 6109
1 11/9/20231
55939123 2694 Moody Ave TM 6301
1 3/2/20231
55939124 2674 Moody Ave TM 6301
1 8/17/20231
55939125 2654 Moody Ave TM 6301
1 9/21/20231
55939126 1722 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 8/29/20231
55939127 1732 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 7/27/20231
55939128 1742 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 8/17/20231
55939130 1731 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 5/4/20231
55939131 1721 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 8/17/20231
55939132 1711 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939133 1701 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939201 1700 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939202 1710 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939203 1720 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939204 1730 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939205 1740 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/19/20231
55939206 1750 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 10/5/20231
55939207 2611 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 7/27/20231
55939208 2621 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 7/27/20231
55939301 2641 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 5/12/20231
55939302 2661 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 4/27/20231
55939303 2681 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 4/27/20231
55939304 1753 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 5/12/20231
55939305 1743 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 3/2/20231
55939306 1733 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 3/2/20231
55939309 1754 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 3/2/20231
55942002S 1677 Teague Ave TM 6154
1 1/23/20231
30902252142 3205 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
1 3/2/20231
30902252141 3215 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
1 3/2/20231
55943202S 1568 Teague Ave TM 6284
1 3/20/20231
55943205S 1563 Richmond Ave TM 6284
1 3/20/20231
55943210S 1519 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
1 3/27/20231
55943104S 1523 Richmond Ave TM 6284
1 3/23/20231
55939310 2731 Loyola Ave TM 6301 1 3/30/2023 1
55463201 4187 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 4/19/2023 1
55463202 4177 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 4/19/2023 1
55463203 4167 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 4/19/2023 1
55463204 4157 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 4/19/2023 1
55463205 4147 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 4/19/20231
55939129 1741 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 5/4/20231
31030016S06 4111 Flint AVE TM 6208
1 5/4/20231
31030016S08 3522 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S31 3533 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
3873
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
31030016S10 3542 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S11 3552 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S30 3543 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S09 3532 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/19/20231
31030016S32 3523 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
30902252002 4755 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
30902252003 4745 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
30902252004 4735 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
30902252005 4725 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
30902252012 4734 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/30/20231
30902252013 4744 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
30902252014 4754 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/18/20231
55463301 4056 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 5/17/20231
55463307 4136 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 5/17/20231
55463308 4146 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 5/17/20231
55463309 4156 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 5/17/20231
31030016S22 3585 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S18 4144 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S20 4164 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S23 3575 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S24 3565 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S25 4155 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 5/30/20231
31030016S26 4145 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S27 4135 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S17 4134 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S21 4174 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S19 4154 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S12 3562 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S13 3572 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 6/6/20231
31030016S15 3592 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S28 3563 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
31030016S29 3553 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 5/18/20231
30902252006 4715 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/30/20231
30902252007 4705 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/30/20231
30902252008 3202 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 5/19/20231
30902252009 3212 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 5/30/20231
30902252104 4602 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252105 4610 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252106 4618 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252107 4626 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
30902252097 4651 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
30902252098 4643 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
30902252099 4635 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252108 4634 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
30902252109 4642 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252110 4650 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252010 3222 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 5/24/20231
30902252011 4724 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
1 5/24/20231
30902252020 4727 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/6/20231
30902252021 3232 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 5/24/20231
6413010000 4011 Scott Ave TM 6413 1 6/12/2023 1
6413030000 4002 Scott Ave 1 6/12/2023 1
6413040000 4012 Scott Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413050000 4022 Scott Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413060000 4032 Scott Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413120000 1650 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413260000 1653 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413330000 4143 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
6413560000 4186 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 6/12/20231
30902252017 4757 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/12/20231
30902252019 4737 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/12/20231
30902252026 4736 Hampton Way
1 6/12/20231
30902252027 4746 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
3874
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30902252028 4756 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/21/20231
55465203 1458 Junipero Ave TM 6304
1 6/14/20231
55465206 1428 Junipero Ave TM 6304
1 6/14/20231
55467022 4104 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 6/14/20231
55467026 1375 Junipero Ave TM 6404
1 6/14/20231
30902252023 3252 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252024 3262 Simental Ave
1 6/29/20231
30902252025 4726 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252034 4719 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252035 3272 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252036 3282 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252093 4683 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 7/5/20231
30902252094 4675 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252095 4667 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252096 4659 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252111 4658 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252112 4666 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252113 4674 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
30902252114 4682 Sussex Ave TM 6161
1 6/29/20231
56017030 1237 N Cindy Ave TM 6348
1 6/29/20231
30902252092 3308 Escalante Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252091 3318 Escalante Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252090 3328 Escalante Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252089 3338 Escalante Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252088 3348 Escalante Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252068 4638 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
30902252069 4631 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 7/12/20231
56017032 584 W Kenosha Ave TM 6348
1 7/13/20231
30902252022 3242 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 7/24/20231
6413110000 1670 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413270000 1673 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413320000 4133 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413570000 4176 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413580000 4166 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413590000 4156 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413610000 4136 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413620000 4126 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413630000 4116 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
6413600000 4146 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 7/25/20231
31030016S14 3582 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 8/2/20231
30902252070 4641 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252071 4651 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252081 4670 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252082 4660 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252083 4650 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252084 4640 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/10/20231
30902252031 4749 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252033 4729 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252040 4728 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252041 4738 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252042 4748 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252037 3302 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252038 3312 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252039 4718 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252048 4721 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252072 4661 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
30946211 3339 Escobedo Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
30902252078 3349 Escobedo Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252080 4680 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252079 4690 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 8/22/20231
30902252064 4678 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
30946102 4668 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
30902252067 4648 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
3875
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6413070000 4063 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 8/31/20231
6413090000 1710 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 8/31/20231
6413290000 1713 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 8/31/20231
6413300000 1733 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 8/31/20231
6413280000 1693 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 8/31/20231
30902252073 4671 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 9/11/20231
30902252018 4747 Hampton Way TM 6161
1 9/11/20231
6413080000 1730 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 9/6/20231
6413100000 1690 La Canada Ave TM 6123
1 9/6/20231
30902252138 3245 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
1 9/11/20231
6413020000 4001 Scott Ave TM 6413
1 9/7/20231
6413130000 1651 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
6413150000 1691 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
6413170000 1731 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
6413180000 4083 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
6413190000 4093 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
6413200000 4103 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 9/8/20231
55943402S 1384 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 9/22/20231
55467008 4183 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
55467009 4193 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
55467010 1407 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
55467011 1417 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
55467012 1427 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
55467013 1437 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
1 9/18/20231
6413310000 4123 Keats Ave TM 6413
1 9/18/20231
6413160000 1711 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 9/27/20231
6413220000 1712 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 9/27/20231
6413230000 1692 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 9/27/20231
6413250000 1652 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 9/27/20231
55467039 4113 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 10/18/20231
6413140000 1671 La Canada Ave TM 6413
1 10/18/20231
6413210000 1732 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 10/18/20231
6413240000 1672 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
1 10/18/20231
55943403S 1520 Enterprise Ave TM 6284
1 11/3/20231
55464101 1801 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55464102 1811 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55463101 1831 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55463102 1841 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55463104 1871 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55463105 1881 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
55467051 4102 Mitchell Ave TM 6182
1 11/2/20231
30902252046 4741 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 11/15/20231
30902252056 4750 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
1 11/15/20231
55463209 4107 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 11/14/20231
6413640000 4106 Twain Ave TM 6413
1 11/14/20231
55467047 4142 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
1 11/14/20231
55467037 4093 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 11/30/20231
30943216 4252 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943211 4212 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943218 4268 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943214 4236 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943212 4220 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943215 4244 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943220 4284 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943219 4276 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
30943213 4228 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
55463103 1851 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
1 12/6/20231
30943217 4260 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
1 12/6/20231
55467040 4123 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
1 12/13/20231
55467046 4152 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
1 12/13/20231
30946203 3322 Simental Ave TM 6161
1 12/20/20231
55467050 4112 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
1 12/18/20231
56408024 1187 N Holly Ave TM 6367
1 12/27/20231
3876
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56408018 1196 N Holly Ave TM 6367
1 12/27/20231
5590110865 1754 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 5560503803 2091 N Rogers Ln TM 6050
0 57124404S 2669 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
1 6/2/20231
55943302S 1542 Richmond Ave TM 6284
1 4/18/20231
57124305S 4330 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 6/2/20231
57124216S 4371 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 6/2/20231
57124110S 2602 Highland Ave TM 6166
1 3/30/20231
55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave B TM 6284
1 12/29/20231
56408024 1187 N Holly Ave B TM 6367
1 12/27/20231
56408018 1196 N Holly Ave B TM 6367
1 12/27/20231
49209615 148 Acacia Ave B NO PROJECT
1 12/19/20231
49937314 2531 Bundy Ave
1 10/25/20231
43030251 514 W Pico Ave B NO PROJECT
1 10/12/20231
55844025 1291 N Whitmore Ave B TM 5472
1 9/19/20231
30946103 4658 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
1 8/25/20231
41037201 109 N Cindy Ave B
1 8/14/20231
41031302 73 N Willow Ave NO PROJECT
1 7/26/20231
49211214 261 Minnewawa Ave B
1 7/10/20231
55311205 2652 Fremont Ave
1 6/26/20231
56108111 957 N Citadel Ave B
1 5/31/20231
49119223 1514 Gibson Ave B NO PROJECT
1 5/4/20231
49207202 120 Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT
1 4/4/20231
49106171 227 W Sierra Ave B
1 3/29/20231
49106171 227 W Sierra Ave C
1 3/29/20231
49106171 237 Sierra Ave B
1 3/29/20231
49106171 237 Sierra Ave C
1 3/29/20231
41053104 281 N Terry Ave B
1 2/24/20231
56010008 1783 N Bush Ave TM 4912
1 2/14/20231
49137001 22 N Villa Ave B
1 2/7/20231
49137001 22 N Villa Ave C
1 2/7/20231
49137002 18 N Villa Ave B
1 2/7/20231
49137002 18 N Villa Ave C
1 2/7/20231
49113103 80 N Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT
1 2/1/20231
49118422 1743 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT
1 1/10/20231
49118416 1729 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT
1 1/10/20231
55943105S 1513 Richmond Ave B TM 6284
0 55941020S 1744 Lester Ave B TM 6154
0 49117107 1470 Fourth St B NO PROJECT
0 49117122 1476 Fourth St B NO PROJECT
0 55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 49821334 1113 Carey Ave NO PROJECT
0 49906021 329 W Rialto Ave B NO PROJECT
0 55933016 2017 Teague Ave TM 5550
0 55940007S 1940 N Ezie Ave TM 6154
0 55941018S 1762 Lester Ave TM 6154
0 55941006S 1765 N Bundy Ave TM 6154
0 55940008S 1919 N Ezie Ave TM 6154
0 49212215 253 Minnewawa PM2023-003
0 56314253 1491 Alluvial MFRDR2023-001
00000
3877
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units 11 12
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
73 0 0 3 0 38 398 512
55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy Bld 34 SPR 2018-011 6 12/27/2023 6 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3601 SPR 2018-011 6 11/21/2023 6 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy 3501 SPR 2018-011 9 12/19/2023 9 43060101 784 W Holland Ave RHNA 2019-001 73 2 6/21/2023 75 55503144 3700 Loma Vista Pkwy SPR 2018-011 3 11/21/2023 3 55534322 3072 De Wolf Ave 1 11/22/2023 1
55926019S 1808 N Carson Ave TM 5122 1 4/28/2023 1
55926011S 1807 N Coventry Ave TM 5122 1 4/28/2023 1
49207202 120 Woodworth Ave 1 1/3/2023 1
55851007 3076 Lester Ave PM 2018-011 1 12/1/2023 1
49215215 356 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 1 7/11/2023 1
49215215 360 Oxford Ave PM 2022-003 1 7/6/2023 1
49209820 156 Sunnyside Ave 0
5612601740 421 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262 1 1/5/2023 1
5612601751 436 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/19/2023 1
5612601059 563 N Citadel Ln TM 6262 1 1/5/2023 1
56129044 472 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 2/1/2023 1
56129043 468 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/31/2023 1
56129042 464 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 2/1/2023 1
56129041 460 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 2/1/2023 1
5612601755 456 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/19/2023 1
5612601051 557 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 2/22/2023 1
56129045 476 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 2/1/2023 1
5612601754 452 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/19/2023 1
5612601753 448 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/9/2023 1
5612601752 440 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 1/19/2023 1
56129064 561 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 2/22/2023 1
56129063 565 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 2/22/2023 1
56129062 569 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 2/22/2023 1
56129061 573 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 2/16/2023 1
56129060 574 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 3/22/2023 1
56129059 570 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 3/22/2023 1
56129058 566 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 3/22/2023 1
56129057 562 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 3/22/2023 1
56129056 558 N Terry Ln TM 6262 1 3/22/2023 1
56129055 559 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/17/2023 1
56129054 563 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/17/2023 1
56129053 567 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/17/2023 1
56128065 576 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/27/2023 1
56129052 571 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/17/2023 1
56129050 496 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 3/31/2023 1
56129049 492 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 3/31/2023 1
56129048 488 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 3/31/2023 1
56128064 572 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/27/2023 1
56129047 484 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 3/31/2023 1
56129046 480 W Balsam Ln TM 6262 1 3/31/2023 1
56129051 575 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/17/2023 1
56128061 560 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/27/2023 1
56128062 564 N Cindy Ln TM 6262 1 4/27/2023 1
Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 Project Identifier
3878
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56128063 568 N Cindy Ln TM 6262
1 4/27/20231
56128060 561 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 5/24/20231
56128057 573 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 5/24/20231
56128059 565 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 5/24/20231
56128056 577 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 5/24/20231
56128058 569 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 5/24/20231
56128020 516 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 5/10/20231
56128019 512 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 5/10/20231
56128018 508 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 5/10/20231
56128017 504 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 5/10/20231
56128016 500 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 5/10/20231
55609012 607 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 2/24/20231
56128024 532 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 6/22/20231
56128025 536 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 6/22/20231
56128055 578 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 6/13/20231
56128054 574 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 6/13/20231
56128053 570 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 6/13/20231
56128052 566 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 6/13/20231
56128051 562 N Sylmar Ln TM 6262
1 6/13/20231
56128021 520 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 6/22/20231
56128023 528 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 6/22/20231
56128022 524 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 6/22/20231
56128010 510 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/6/20231
56128009 514 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/6/20231
56128008 518 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/6/20231
55609050 545 Bloom Ln TM 6050
1 2/10/20231
56128007 522 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/6/20231
556128006 526 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/6/20231
56127035 598 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/22/20231
56127034 602 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/22/20231
56127028 626 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/7/20231
56127033 606 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/22/20231
56127032 610 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/22/20231
56127031 614 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/22/20231
56127030 618 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/7/20231
56127027 630 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/7/20231
56127029 622 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/7/20231
56127026 634 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 8/7/20231
56127025 638 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/19/20231
56127024 642 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/19/20231
56127023 646 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/19/20231
56127022 652 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/19/20231
56127021 656 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 7/19/20231
5590517613 2773 Vermont Ave TM 6301
1 1/3/20231
55609009 667 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 2/24/20231
55609057 405 Bloom Ln TM 6050
1 2/2/20231
56127006 568 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 8/31/20231
56127007 572 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 8/31/20231
56127008 576 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 8/31/20231
56127009 580 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 8/31/20231
56127010 584 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 8/31/20231
56127011 583 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 9/18/20231
56127012 579 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 9/18/20231
56127013 575 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 9/18/20231
56127014 571 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 9/18/20231
56127015 567 N Adler Ln TM 6262
1 9/18/20231
56127036 590 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 9/14/20231
56127037 586 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 9/14/20231
56127038 582 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 9/14/20231
56127039 578 W Mahogany Ln TM 62621 9/14/2023
1 56127040 574 W Mahogany Ln TM 62621 9/14/2023
1 56127016 566 N Helm Ln TM 62621 10/10/2023
1 56127017 570 N Helm Ln TM 62621 10/10/2023
1 56127018 574 N Helm Ln TM 62621 10/10/2023
1 56127019 578 N Helm Ln TM 62621 10/10/2023
1 56127020 582 N Helm Ln TM 62621 10/10/2023
1 55609054 465 Bloom Ln TM 6050
1 2/3/20231
56127005 596 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 10/16/20231
3879
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56127004 592 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 10/30/20231
56127003 588 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 10/24/20231
56127002 584 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 10/16/20231
56127001 580 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 10/16/20231
56128001 546 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 10/19/20231
56128002 542 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 10/19/20231
56128003 538 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 10/19/20231
56128005 530 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 10/19/20231
56128050 563 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/12/20231
56128049 567 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/12/20231
56128048 571 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/12/20231
56128047 575 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/12/20231
56128046 579 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/12/20231
56128026 540 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128027 544 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128028 548 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128029 552 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128030 556 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128040 565 N Helm Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128039 569 N Helm Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128038 573 N Helm Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128037 577 N Helm Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128036 581 N Helm Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128041 564 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/11/20231
56128042 568 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/11/20231
56128043 572 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/11/20231
56128044 576 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/11/20231
56128045 580 N Chapel Hill Ln TM 6262
1 10/11/20231
56128031 560 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128032 564 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128033 568 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128034 572 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128035 576 W Balsam Ln TM 6262
1 11/8/20231
56128070 554 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128069 558 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128068 562 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128067 566 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
56128066 570 W Mahogany Ln TM 6262
1 11/7/20231
55609087 401 Vintage Ln TM 6050
1 2/16/20231
5590504141 2939 Teague Ave TM 6339
1 12/22/20231
5590517619 1745 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 2/22/20231
5590517620 1735 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 2/28/20231
5590517654 2741 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 11/14/20231
5590517655 2751 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 11/22/20231
5590517624 2704 Moody Ave TM 6301
1 1/4/20231
5590504131 2997 Trenton Ave TM 6339
1 5/8/20231
5590504115 1677 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/5/20231
5590504112 2965 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 3/10/20231
5590504113 2975 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 3/29/20231
5590504111 2955 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 3/10/20231
5590504114 1687 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 4/5/20231
5540402010 3075 Keats Ave TM 6349
1 1/3/20231
5590504109 2935 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 8/18/20231
5590504108 2925 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 4/6/20231
5590504110 2945 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 4/6/20231
56052050S 984 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 1/18/20231
56052049S 976 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 1/18/20231
56052033S 985 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/2/20231
56052034S 977 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/3/20231
56052048S 968 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 1/25/20231
56052047S 960 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/3/20231
56052035S 969 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/16/20231
56052036S 961 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/10/20231
56052046S 952 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/17/20231
3880
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55612013 501 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/6/20231
55612012 513 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/6/20231
55612011 525 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/7/20231
55612010 537 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/7/20231
55612009 549 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/14/20231
55612008 561 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/14/20231
55612007 603 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/14/20231
55612006 615 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/22/20231
55612005 627 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/22/20231
55612004 639 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 2/22/20231
55612003 651 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 3/1/20231
55612002 663 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 3/8/20231
55942038S 1684 N Shirley Ave TM 6154
1 1/3/20231
55609017 507 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/15/20231
55609013 587 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/1/20231
55609016 527 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/10/20231
55609015 547 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/13/20231
55609014 567 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/9/20231
5590504107 2915 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 9/8/20231
5590504106 2905 Vermont Ave TM 6339
1 9/8/20231
5590504105 1694 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339
1 10/3/20231
5590504103 1674 N Greenfield Ave TM 6339
1 10/10/20231
55609026 2120 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 8/18/20231
55609027 2110 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 8/24/20231
55609028 2100 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 9/6/20231
55609029 2090 N Perry Ln TM 6050
0 55609030 2080 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 1/3/20241
55609025 2130 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 8/15/20231
55609024 2140 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 7/11/20231
55609023 2150 N Perry Ln TM 6050
1 4/25/20231
55609022 407 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 6/29/20231
55609021 427 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 6/29/20231
55609020 447 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/6/20231
55609019 467 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/8/20231
55609018 487 Heirloom Ln TM 6050
1 3/7/20231
55939119 1725 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 2/28/20231
55939308 1744 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 3/7/20231
55464302 1676 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 1/17/20231
56052042S 920 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 3/2/20231
56052044S 936 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/23/20231
56052040S 929 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 3/2/20231
56052032S 988 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/13/20231
56052025S 932 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/4/20231
56052029S 964 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/13/20231
56052031S 980 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/13/20231
56052028S 956 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/12/20231
56052024S 924 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/4/20231
56052026S 940 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 3/28/20231
56052043s 928 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 3/2/20231
56052045S 944 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/2/20231
56052037S 953 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/16/20231
56052039S 937 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 3/16/20231
56052030S 972 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/12/20231
56052027S 948 Serena Ave TM 6263
1 4/12/20231
56052041S 921 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 3/7/20231
56052038S 945 Everglade Ave TM 6263
1 2/23/20231
55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154
1 2/24/20231
55940015S 1765 Lester Ave TM 6154
1 3/7/20231
55942004S 1787 Teague Ave TM 6154
1 1/13/20231
55942018S 1730 Trenton Ave TM 6154
1 1/19/20231
55465718 4176 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 1/17/20231
56408019 1186 N Holly Ave TM 6367
1 5/22/20231
3881
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56017029 1247 N Cindy Ave TM 6348
1 1/31/20231
55465303 4085 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 8/3/20231
55465304 4095 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 4/24/20231
55465306 4115 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 5/8/20231
55465308 4135 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 4/14/20231
55465309 4145 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 1/20/20231
55465310 4155 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 3/30/20231
55465311 4165 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 3/9/20231
55465312 4175 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 1/20/20231
55465314 4195 Dennis Ave TM 6304
1 1/23/20231
55938201 2613 Vermont Ave TM 6209
1 2/28/20231
55941020S 1744 Lester Ave TM 6154
1 3/6/20231
55941007S 1766 N Renn Ave TM 6154 1/19/2023
0 56408020 1176 N Holly Ave TM 6367 5/22/2023
0 56408025 1197 N Holly Ave TM 6367 5/23/2023
0 55464502 4161 Scott Ave TM 6123 1/27/2023
0 55464503 4151 Scott Ave TM 6123 1/4/2023
0 55464504 4141 Scott Ave TM 6123 4/19/2023
0 55464505 4131 Scott Ave TM 6123 1/31/2023
0 55464506 4121 Scott Ave TM 6123 1/25/2023
0 55464507 4111 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/1/2023
0 55464508 4101 Scott Ave TM 6123 1/26/2023
0 55464509 4091 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/1/2023
0 55464510 4081 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/1/2023
0 55536236 2101 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/8/2023
0 55536250 2160 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/2/2023
0 55536238 2061 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/2/2023
0 55536234 2141 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/2/2023
0 5582900601 1697 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389 9/6/2023
0 55612033 2006 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/9/2023
0 55612032 2012 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/19/2023
0 55612031 2018 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/13/2023
0 55612030 2024 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/13/2023
0 31030016S37 3555 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/26/2023
0 31030016S38 3545 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/26/2023
0 31030016S39 3535 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/26/2023
0 31030016S40 3525 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/26/2023
0 31030016S41 3515 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/27/2023
0 31030016S43 3505 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208 10/27/2023
0 56017028 1257 N Cindy Ave TM 6348 2/21/2023
0 55612034 2005 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/19/2023
0 55612035 2011 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/23/2023
0 55612036 2017 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/23/2023
0 55612037 2023 N Inverness Ln TM 6329 1/23/2023
0 55464511 4071 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/9/2023
0 55464512 4061 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/9/2023
0 55464513 4051 Scott Ave TM 6123 3/22/2023
0 55464514 4041 Scott Ave TM 6123 2/9/2023
0 55464515 4031 Scott Ave TM 6123 3/27/2023
0 55464516 4021 Scott Ave TM 6123 5/10/2023
0 55609075 641 Vintage Ln TM 6050 12/7/2023
0 55609074 661 Vintage Ln TM 6050 12/5/2023
0 55609073 681 Vintage Ln TM 6050 11/28/2023
0 55609072 682 Bloom Ln TM 6050 11/6/2023
0 55609071 662 Bloom Ln TM 6050 10/23/2023
0 55609070 642 Bloom Ln TM 6050 10/19/2023
0 55536245 2060 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/1/2023
0 55536231 2067 Amanecer Ave TM 6025 1/12/2023
0 55536202 2087 Amanecer Ave TM 6025 1/24/2023
0 55536203 3801 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 1/20/2023
0 55536204 3809 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 1/24/2023
0 3882
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55536205 3817 Fairmont Ave TM 6025 1/26/2023
0 55611034 500 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/8/2023
0 55464201 1797 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 2/14/2023
0 55464202 1777 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 4/14/2023
0 55464203 1757 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 3/30/2023
0 55464204 1737 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 4/4/2023
0 55464205 1717 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 6/6/2023
0 55465401 1447 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 3/21/2023
0 55465402 1457 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 7/10/2023
0 55465403 1467 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 6/20/2023
0 55465404 1477 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 9/27/2023
0 55465405 1487 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 2/16/2023
0 55465406 1497 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 2/16/2023
0 55611037 536 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/21/2023
0 55611036 524 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/21/2023
0 55611035 512 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/8/2023
0 55611038 548 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/22/2023
0 55611039 560 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/22/2023
0 55611040 602 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/23/2023
0 55611041 614 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 3/23/2023
0 55536237 2081 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/10/2023
0 55536240 2021 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/7/2023
0 55536239 2041 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/2/2023
0 5540402003 3026 Keats Ave TM 6349 5/24/2023
0 55536241 2001 Descanso Ave TM 6377 3/28/2023
0 55611042 626 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 4/10/2023
0 55611043 638 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 4/14/2023
0 55611044 650 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 4/10/2023
0 55611045 662 Pioneer Ln TM 6329 4/14/2023
0 5590210330 1522 Richmond Ave TM 6284 6/28/2023
0 5590210305 1513 Richmond Ave TM 6284 6/28/2023
0 5590210332 1562 Richmond Ave TM 6284 7/12/2023
0 55611031 2058 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 4/25/2023
0 55611032 2052 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/2/2023
0 55611029 2065 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/17/2023
0 55611028 2059 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/16/2023
0 55611026 2047 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/17/2023
0 55611033 2046 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/2/2023
0 55611030 2064 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 4/25/2023
0 5590210333 1528 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 8/4/2023
0 55942037S 1694 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 5/8/2023
0 55611027 2053 N Ralph Ln TM 6329 5/16/2023
0 55536244 2040 Descanso Ave TM 6377 5/15/2023
0 55536243 2020 Descanso Ave TM 6377 5/15/2023
0 55536233 2161 Descanso Ave TM 6377 4/13/2023
0 5590210322 1583 Richmond Ave TM 6284 8/8/2023
0 55464306 4183 Keats Ave TM 6123 4/24/2023
0 55464307 4173 Keats Ave TM 6123 4/24/2023
0 55464308 4163 Keats Ave TM 6123 5/2/2023
0 55611022 2058 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 6/1/2023
0 55611023 2052 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 6/1/2023
0 55611024 2046 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 6/7/2023
0 55943209S 1529 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 8/24/2023
0 55943211S 1509 N Stanford Ave TM 6284 9/1/2023
0 55611018 2041 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 7/17/2023
0 55611019 2047 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 7/25/2023
0 55611020 2053 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 7/18/2023
0 55611021 2059 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 7/18/2023
0 55464309 1745 San Marino Ave TM 6123 5/15/2023
0 55464310 1725 San Marino Ave TM 6123 5/10/2023
0 55464311 1695 San Marino Ave TM 6123 6/2/2023
0 3883
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55464312 1675 San Marino Ave TM 6123 6/13/2023
0 55464313 1655 San Marino Ave TM 6123 6/13/2023
0 55465205 1438 Junipero Ave TM 6304 5/15/2023
0 55611025 2040 N Hammel Ln TM 6329 6/7/2023
0 55461014S 3808 Portals Ave TM 6254 11/17/2023
0 55461015S 3849 Portals Ave TM 6254 11/22/2023
0 55943206S 1573 Richmond Ave TM 6284 10/6/2023
0 55943208S 1593 Richmond Ave TM 6284 10/26/2023
0 55465101 1598 Junipero Ave TM 6304 11/14/2023
0 55465102 1578 Junipero Ave TM 6304 11/20/2023
0 55465103 1550 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304 10/30/2023
0 55465104 1530 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6304 11/2/2023
0 55465201 1478 Junipero Ave TM 6304 10/10/2023
0 55465202 1468 Junipero Ave TM 6304 10/6/2023
0 55465204 1448 Junipero Ave TM 6304 10/6/2023
0 55465207 1418 Junipero Ave TM 6304 5/26/2023
0 5560504166 2220 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
0 55465407 4198 Beverly Ave TM 6304
1 9/1/20231
5560504181 2283 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504172 2211 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 55465408 4188 Beverly Ave TM 6304
1 8/23/20231
5560504170 1076 Windmill Ave TM 6292
0 5560504173 2219 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504179 2267 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504163 2280 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
0 55465409 4178 Beverly Ave TM 6304 1 11/29/2023 1
5560504167 2200 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
0 55465410 4179 San Jose Ave TM 6304 1 10/26/2023 1
55465411 4189 San Jose Ave TM 6304 1 9/1/2023 1
5560504176 2243 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 55465412 4199 San Jose Ave TM 6304 1 9/20/2023 1
55605042050 1216 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55465413 1567 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 1 9/26/2023 1
55605042045 2232 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042058 2203 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042062 2235 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55465414 1577 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 1 9/12/2023 1
55465415 1587 Las Rosas Ave TM 6304 1 9/14/2023 1
55605042052 1256 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042056 1346 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55943203S 1548 Teague Ave TM 6284
0 55605042041 2264 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042067 2275 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042038 2288 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042044 2240 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042064 2251 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042039 2280 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042048 2208 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042055 1326 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042060 2219 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605041137 1052 Springtime Ave TM 6292
0 55605041136 1046 Springtime Ave TM 6292
0 5560504164 2260 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
0 5560504175 2235 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504169 1066 Windmill Ave TM 6292
0 5560504182 2291 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504168 1056 Windmill Ave TM 6292
0 5560504165 2240 N Eddy Ave TM 6292
0 5560504171 2203 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504174 2227 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504177 2251 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 3884
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
5560504180 2275 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504185 2375 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 55605041169 1030 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041175 1066 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504191 1055 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504197 1019 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041104 2364 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041148 1016 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 5560504188 1073 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504195 1031 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041100 2396 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041164 1021 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 55605041172 1048 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504189 1067 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504196 1025 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041165 1015 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 5560504184 2345 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504199 1007 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041139 1053 Springtime Ave TM 6292
0 30942203 4232 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 55605041177 1078 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504186 1085 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504193 1043 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 49106171 227 W Sierra Ave
0 55605041102 2380 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041105 2356 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041147 1010 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 55605041167 1018 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041173 1054 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504192 1049 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 49106171 237 W Sierra Ave PM 2022-002
0 55605041103 2372 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041149 1022 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 55605041168 1024 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041176 1072 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504187 1079 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504194 1037 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041101 2388 N Phillip Ave TM 6292
0 55605041174 1060 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504183 2315 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504190 1061 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 5560504178 2259 N Argyle Ave TM 6292
0 5560504198 1013 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 55605041138 1059 Springtime Ave TM 6292
0 55605041166 1009 Plum Tree Ave TM 6292
0 55605041170 1036 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 57124106S 2682 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 11/14/2023 1
57124310S 4280 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 1/2/2024 1
57124213S 4341 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124403S 2649 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
0 57124109S 2622 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 11/13/2023 1
55605042094 2233 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 57124203S 4241 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 11/20/2023 1 57124209S 4301 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 1/2/20241
57124306S 4320 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 2/9/20241
57124302S 4360 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124108S 2642 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 11/13/2023 1
57124315S 4230 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 11/21/2023 1
57124204S 4251 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 11/20/2023 1
49137002 18 N Villa Ave
0 49137001 22 N Villa Ave
0 3885
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
57124208S 4291 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124307S 4310 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 2/9/20241
57124104S 2722 Highland Ave TM 6166
1 11/14/20231
57124311S 4270 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 12/19/20231
57124212S 4331 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 2/9/20241
57124303S 4350 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
000000
57124201S 4221 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 11/17/20231
57124312S 4260 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 12/21/20231
57124207S 4281 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 1/8/20241
57124313S 4250 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 12/15/20231
57124210S 4311 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 2/9/20241
55943306S 1508 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
0 57124405S 2689 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
0 57124105S 2702 Highland Ave TM 6166
1 11/13/20231
57124316S 4220 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 11/21/20231
57124205S 4261 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
1 11/22/20231
57124308S 4300 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124214S 4351 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124301S 4370 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124401S 2609 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
0 57124103S 2742 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 11/20/2023 1
57124202S 4231 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 11/20/2023 1
57124215S 4361 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124304S 4340 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124107S 2662 Highland Ave TM 6166 1 11/14/2023 1
57124314S 4240 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 11/21/2023 1
57124206S 4271 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 12/13/2023 1
57124309S 4290 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124211S 4321 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166 1 2/14/2024 1
57124402S 2629 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
0 55605042005 1217 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042074 2258 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042077 1319 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042082 2220 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042095 1234 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042087 1305 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042009 1257 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042033 2273 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042027 2274 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042070 1318 Springtime Ave TM 6344
0 55605042101 1328 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55611001 2041 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 1/10/2024 1
55611002 2045 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 1/3/2024 1
55611003 2049 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 1/22/2024 1
55611004 2053 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 1/3/20241
55611005 2057 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 1/22/20241
55611006 2056 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 11/28/20231
55611007 2052 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 11/28/20231
55611008 2048 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 11/29/20231
55611009 2044 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 11/29/20231
55611010 2043 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 9/7/20231
55611011 2049 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 9/7/20231
55611012 2055 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 9/6/20231
55611013 2061 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 9/6/20231
55611014 2060 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 8/8/20231
55611015 2054 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 8/9/20231
3886
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55611016 2048 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 8/15/20231
55611017 2042 N Inverness Ln TM 6329
1 8/16/20231
55611046 712 Pioneer Ln TM 6329
1 12/27/20231
55612001 713 Farmhouse Ln TM 6329
1 12/27/20231
55612038 2020 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 10/2/20231
55612039 2016 N Rogers Ln TM 6329
1 10/3/20231
55612040 2012 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/3/2023 1
55612041 2008 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/3/2023 1
55943201S 1578 Teague Ave TM 6284
0 55612042 2009 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/11/2023 1
55605042093 2225 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55612043 2013 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/11/2023 1
55612044 2017 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/17/2023 1
55612045 2021 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 10/16/2023 1
55612046 2025 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 11/2/2023 1
55605042084 1329 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55612047 2029 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 11/6/2023 1
55605042012 1287 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042034 2281 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042026 2282 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042069 1310 Springtime Ave TM 6344
0 55605042100 1320 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042085 1321 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042088 1271 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042008 1247 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55611048 2033 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 11/9/2023 1
55611047 2037 N Rogers Ln TM 6329 1 11/9/2023 1
55605042031 2257 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042078 1311 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 30942417 3270 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55605042090 1235 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042025 2290 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042072 2272 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042080 2236 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042089 1253 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042006 1227 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042036 2297 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042028 2266 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042079 1303 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042099 1312 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042091 2209 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042010 1267 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042076 1327 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042097 1270 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042004 1207 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042035 2289 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 31030016S02 4151 Flint AVE TM 6208 1 11/1/2023 1
55605042030 2250 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042068 1302 Springtime Ave TM 6344
0 55605042075 2250 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 31030016S33 4132 Flint Ave TM 6208 1 10/30/2023 1
55605042083 2212 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 31030016S34 4142 Flint Ave TM 6208 1 10/30/2023 1
55605042007 1237 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042032 2265 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55463401 4176 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 8/15/2023 1
55605042029 2258 N Elm Ave TM 6344
0 55605042071 1326 Springtime Ave TM 6344
0 55605042092 2217 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042011 1277 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042073 2266 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 3887
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55463402 4186 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 8/24/2023 1
55605042081 2228 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55854002 3252 Vermont Ave TM 6389
0 55605042098 1304 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 55605042086 1313 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042046 2224 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042042 2256 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042053 1276 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042061 2227 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042037 2296 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042051 1236 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 55605042057 1366 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 30943414 3320 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55605042065 2259 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042063 2243 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55463403 1977 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 1 8/22/2023 1
55605042040 2272 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55463404 1957 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 8/10/20231
55463405 1937 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 8/2/20231
55463406 1917 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 8/17/20231
31030016S35 4152 Flint Ave TM 6208
1 11/8/20231
55463407 1887 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 8/16/20231
31030016S36 4162 Flint Ave TM 6208
1 10/27/20231
55463408 1867 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 7/27/20231
31030016S04 4131 Flint AVE TM 6208
1 11/1/20231
55463409 1847 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123
1 7/24/20231
55605042047 2216 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042059 2211 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605042043 2248 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042049 1206 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 30942210 4288 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 55605042054 1306 Windmill Ave TM 6344
0 30942109 4263 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942205 4248 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942114 4223 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 55605042066 2267 N Duke Ave TM 6344
0 55605041171 1042 Fruitwood Ave TM 6292
0 30942118 3210 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942126 3290 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942211 4217 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942306 4258 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942107 4279 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942208 4272 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942112 4239 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942201 4216 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942120 3230 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942123 3260 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942303 4234 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942214 4241 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942217 4265 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 55605042002 2338 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 30942108 4271 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942111 4247 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942202 4224 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942122 3250 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942124 3270 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942302 4226 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942216 4257 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 55605042017 1228 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 30942209 4280 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942206 4256 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 3888
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30942116 4207 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942119 3220 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942213 4233 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 55605042014 1258 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 30942305 4250 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942218 4273 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942106 4287 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942207 4264 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942113 4231 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942121 3240 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 55605042020 1229 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 30942215 4249 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942304 4242 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942110 4255 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942204 4240 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942115 4215 Buckingham Ave TM 6023
0 30942117 3200 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942125 3280 Frontera Ave TM 6023
0 30942212 4225 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 30942301 4218 Hampton Way TM 6023
0 55605042022 1249 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 55605042013 1268 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55605042019 1219 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 55605042003 2368 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042016 1238 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55463410 1827 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 1 7/24/2023 1
55605042023 1259 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 55605042015 1248 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 55463411 1807 Las Rosas Ave TM 6123 1 7/24/2023 1
55605042024 1269 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 55464401 1654 San Marino Ave TM 6123 1 7/7/2023 1
55605042001 2308 N Russell Ave TM 6344
0 55605042018 1218 Fruitwood Ave TM 6344
0 31030016S05 4121 Flint AVE TM 6208 1 11/1/2023 1
55605042021 1239 Plum Tree Ave TM 6344
0 55464402 1674 San Marino Ave TM 6123 1 7/11/2023 1
55464403 1694 San Marino Ave TM 6123 1 7/12/2023 1
55464404 1724 San Marino Ave TM 6123 1 7/27/2023 1
55464405 1744 San Marino Ave TM 6123 1 7/25/2023 1
31030016S07 3512 San Marino Ave TM 6208 1 12/12/2023 1
30942507 3271 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55943106S 1494 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 1 10/19/2023 1
30944206 3351 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
0 30944103 4423 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30944226 4446 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30943411 3350 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944231 4416 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30942414 3250 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944203 3321 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30943408 4337 Sussex Ave TM 6023
0 30944228 4434 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30944106 4441 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30943412 3340 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944105 4435 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 55610072 2002 N Perry Ln TM 6328 1 1/16/2024 1
55610073 2008 N Perry Ln TM 6328 1 1/16/2024 1
55610074 2014 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 2/6/20241
55610075 2020 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 2/6/20241
55610076 2026 N Perry Ln TM 6328
1 2/8/20241
55943109S 1464 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 10/2/20231
3889
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55943110S 1454 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
1 10/19/20231
30944225 4452 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30942508 3281 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30942418 3290 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55943323S 1455 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
0 30944202 3311 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55943324S 1465 N Purdue Ave TM 6284 1 10/2/2023 1
30944233 3322 Amistad Ave TM 6023
0 30942506 3261 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55605042096 1252 Summerset Ave TM 6344
0 30943415 3310 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944205 3341 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30943409 4357 Sussex Ave TM 6023
0 55467014 4184 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 11/29/2023 1
30944235 3302 Amistad Ave TM 6023
0 30944229 4428 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30942416 3260 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944201 3301 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55467017 4154 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 12/8/2023 1
30944230 4422 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 55467018 4144 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 11/21/2023 1
30944107 4447 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30942505 3251 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55467020 4124 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 12/13/2023 1
30943413 3330 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944207 3361 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30943407 4317 Sussex Ave TM 6023
0 55467021 4114 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 12/6/2023 1
30944102 4417 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 55467023 4094 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 12/6/2023 1
55467024 4084 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404 1 12/5/2023 1
30944227 4440 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30942509 3291 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 55467025 1385 Junipero Ave TM 6404 1 12/4/2023 1
30942417 3280 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944204 3331 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30943410 3360 La Mirada Ave TM 6023
0 30944234 3312 Amistad Ave TM 6023
0 30944232 4410 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30944101 4411 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30944104 4429 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 30944224 4458 Mecca Ave TM 6023
0 55942003S 1697 Teague Ave TM 6154
0 55941024S 1775 N Renn Ave TM 6154
0 55941022S 1795 N Renn Ave TM 6154
0 55942020S 1661 N Shirley Ave TM 6154 1 12/28/2023 1
55943101S 1508 Teague Ave TM 6284
0 55609007 2131 N Rogers Ln TM 6050
0 55536235 2121 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 7/18/2023 1
55536242 2000 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 7/17/2023 1
55536246 2080 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 10/11/2023 1
55536247 2100 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 10/12/2023 1
55536248 2120 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 10/24/2023 1
55536249 2140 Descanso Ave TM 6377 1 12/13/2023 1
55944032 2976 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944033 2966 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944034 2956 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944035 2946 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944036 2936 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944037 2926 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 55944038 2916 Trenton Ave TM 6339
0 3890
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55944043 2959 Teague Ave TM 6339
0 55944044 2969 Teague Ave TM 6339
0 55944045 2979 Teague Ave TM 6339
0 55944046 1607 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 10/30/20231
55944047 1617 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 10/20/20231
55944048 1627 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 11/8/20231
55944049 1637 N Megan Ave TM 6339
1 11/22/20231
55944050 1647 N Megan Ave TM 6339 1 12/15/2023 1
55855002 1687 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855003 1677 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855004 1667 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855005 1657 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55854001 1647 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55854003 3242 Vermont Ave TM 6389
0 55854004 1669 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854005 1663 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854006 1657 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854007 1651 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854008 1645 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854009 1639 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854010 1633 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854011 1632 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854012 1638 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854013 1644 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854014 1650 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854015 1656 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55854016 1662 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855019 1668 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855018 1674 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855017 1680 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855016 1686 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855015 1692 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855014 1698 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855020 1699 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855021 1693 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855022 1687 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855023 1681 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855024 1675 N Blackwood Ave TM 6389
0 55855006 1658 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855007 1668 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855008 1678 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855009 1688 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855010 1698 N Twinberry Ave TM 6389
0 55855011 3230 Loyola Ave TM 6389
0 55855012 3220 Loyola Ave TM 6389
0 55936306 1643 N Ryan Ave TM 6109
0 55939123 2694 Moody Ave TM 6301 1 10/25/2023 1
55939124 2674 Moody Ave TM 6301 1 2/5/2024 1
55939125 2654 Moody Ave TM 6301
0 55939126 1722 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
0 55939127 1732 N Applegate Ave TM 6301 1 12/28/2023 1
55939128 1742 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
0 55939130 1731 N Hanson Ave TM 6301 1 11/8/2023 1
55939131 1721 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939132 1711 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939133 1701 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939201 1700 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939202 1710 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939203 1720 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939204 1730 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939205 1740 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 3891
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
55939206 1750 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
0 55939207 2611 Loyola Ave TM 6301 1 1/26/2024 1
55939208 2621 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 12/21/20231
55939301 2641 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 12/12/20231
55939302 2661 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 12/28/20231
55939303 2681 Loyola Ave TM 6301
1 11/14/20231
55939304 1753 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 11/28/20231
55939305 1743 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 10/17/20231
55939306 1733 N Applegate Ave TM 6301
1 10/30/20231
55939309 1754 N Park Ave TM 6301
1 12/28/20231
55942002S 1677 Teague Ave TM 6154
1 9/6/20231
30902252142 3205 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
0 30902252141 3215 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
0 55943202S 1568 Teague Ave TM 6284
1 12/6/20231
55943205S 1563 Richmond Ave TM 6284
1 12/12/20231
55943210S 1519 N Stanford Ave TM 6284
1 11/21/20231
55943104S 1523 Richmond Ave TM 6284
1 10/30/20231
55939310 2731 Loyola Ave TM 6301 1 10/17/2023 1
55463201 4187 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 9/28/2023 1
55463202 4177 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 10/17/2023 1
55463203 4167 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 10/6/2023 1
55463204 4157 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 10/17/2023 1
55463205 4147 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 10/6/20231
55939129 1741 N Hanson Ave TM 6301
1 11/8/20231
31030016S06 4111 Flint AVE TM 6208
1 12/13/20231
31030016S08 3522 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 2/14/20241
31030016S31 3533 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 11/14/20231
31030016S10 3542 San Marino Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S11 3552 San Marino Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S30 3543 San Marino Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S09 3532 San Marino Ave TM 6208 1 11/7/2023 1 31030016S32 3523 San Marino Ave TM 6208 1 11/29/2023 1
30902252002 4755 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252003 4745 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252004 4735 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252005 4725 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252012 4734 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252013 4744 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252014 4754 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 55463301 4056 Poe Ave TM 6123 1 10/27/2023 1
55463307 4136 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 11/2/20231
55463308 4146 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 11/8/20231
55463309 4156 Poe Ave TM 6123
1 11/9/20231
31030016S22 3585 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 11/8/20231
31030016S18 4144 Lansing Ave TM 6208
0 31030016S20 4164 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 11/8/20231
31030016S23 3575 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 12/12/20231
31030016S24 3565 Las Rosas Ave TM 6208
1 11/10/20231
31030016S25 4155 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 12/12/20231
31030016S26 4145 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 11/21/20231
31030016S27 4135 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 11/21/20231
31030016S17 4134 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 1/19/20241
31030016S21 4174 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 11/9/20231
31030016S19 4154 Lansing Ave TM 6208
1 11/17/20231
31030016S12 3562 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 11/21/20231
31030016S13 3572 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 1/17/20241
31030016S15 3592 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 11/27/20231
31030016S28 3563 San Marino Ave TM 6208
1 1/31/20241
31030016S29 3553 San Marino Ave TM 6208 1 1/31/2024 1
30902252006 4715 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252007 4705 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 3892
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
30902252008 3202 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252009 3212 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252104 4602 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252105 4610 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252106 4618 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252107 4626 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252097 4651 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252098 4643 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252099 4635 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252108 4634 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252109 4642 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252110 4650 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252010 3222 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252011 4724 Buckingham Ave TM 6161
0 30902252020 4727 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 30902252021 3232 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 6413010000 4011 Scott Ave TM 6413 1 2/6/2024 1
6413030000 4002 Scott Ave 1 2/6/2024 1
6413040000 4012 Scott Ave TM 6413 1 2/6/2024 1
6413050000 4022 Scott Ave TM 6413
0 6413060000 4032 Scott Ave TM 6413
0 6413120000 1650 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413260000 1653 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413330000 4143 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 6413560000 4186 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 30902252017 4757 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 30902252019 4737 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 30902252026 4736 Hampton Way
0 30902252027 4746 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 30902252028 4756 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 55465203 1458 Junipero Ave TM 6304 1 11/9/2023 1
55465206 1428 Junipero Ave TM 6304 1 11/20/2023 1
55467022 4104 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 55467026 1375 Junipero Ave TM 6404 1 11/30/2023 1
30902252023 3252 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252024 3262 Simental Ave
0 30902252025 4726 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 30902252034 4719 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252035 3272 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252036 3282 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252093 4683 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252094 4675 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252095 4667 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252096 4659 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252111 4658 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252112 4666 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252113 4674 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 30902252114 4682 Sussex Ave TM 6161
0 56017030 1237 N Cindy Ave TM 6348 1 11/17/2023 1
30902252092 3308 Escalante Ave TM 6161
0 30902252091 3318 Escalante Ave TM 6161
0 30902252090 3328 Escalante Ave TM 6161
0 30902252089 3338 Escalante Ave TM 6161
0 30902252088 3348 Escalante Ave TM 6161
0 30902252068 4638 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252069 4631 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 56017032 584 W Kenosha Ave TM 6348 1 12/15/2023 1
30902252022 3242 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 6413110000 1670 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413270000 1673 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413320000 4133 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 3893
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6413570000 4176 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413580000 4166 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413590000 4156 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413610000 4136 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413620000 4126 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413630000 4116 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 6413600000 4146 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 31030016S14 3582 San Marino Ave TM 6208
0 30902252070 4641 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252071 4651 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252081 4670 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252082 4660 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252083 4650 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252084 4640 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252031 4749 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252033 4729 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252040 4728 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252041 4738 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252042 4748 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252037 3302 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252038 3312 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 30902252039 4718 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252048 4721 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252072 4661 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30946211 3339 Escobedo Ave TM 6161
0 30902252078 3349 Escobedo Ave TM 6161
0 30902252080 4680 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252079 4690 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252064 4678 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30946102 4668 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 30902252067 4648 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 6413070000 4063 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 6413090000 1710 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413290000 1713 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413300000 1733 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413280000 1693 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 30902252073 4671 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252018 4747 Hampton Way TM 6161
0 6413080000 1730 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413100000 1690 La Canada Ave TM 6123
0 30902252138 3245 Lourdes Ave TM 6161
0 6413020000 4001 Scott Ave TM 6413 1 2/6/2024 1
6413130000 1651 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413150000 1691 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413170000 1731 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413180000 4083 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 6413190000 4093 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 6413200000 4103 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 55943402S 1384 N Purdue Ave TM 6284
0 55467008 4183 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 55467009 4193 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 55467010 1407 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
0 55467011 1417 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
0 55467012 1427 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
0 55467013 1437 Las Rosas Ave TM 6404
0 6413310000 4123 Keats Ave TM 6413
0 6413160000 1711 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413220000 1712 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413230000 1692 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413250000 1652 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 55467039 4113 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 3894
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
6413140000 1671 La Canada Ave TM 6413
0 6413210000 1732 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 6413240000 1672 Hermosa Ave TM 6413
0 55943403S 1520 Enterprise Ave TM 6284
0 55464101 1801 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55464102 1811 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55463101 1831 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55463102 1841 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55463104 1871 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55463105 1881 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 55467051 4102 Mitchell Ave TM 6182
0 30902252046 4741 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 30902252056 4750 Joaquin Ave TM 6161
0 55463209 4107 Poe Ave TM 6123
0 6413640000 4106 Twain Ave TM 6413
0 55467047 4142 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
0 55467037 4093 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 30943216 4252 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943211 4212 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943218 4268 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943214 4236 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943212 4220 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943215 4244 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943220 4284 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943219 4276 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 30943213 4228 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 55463103 1851 Agua Dulce Ave TM 6182
0 30943217 4260 Bellaire Ave TM 6023
0 55467040 4123 Hoblitt Ave TM 6404
0 55467046 4152 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
0 30946203 3322 Simental Ave TM 6161
0 55467050 4112 Mitchell Ave TM 6404
0 56408024 1187 N Holly Ave TM 6367
0 56408018 1196 N Holly Ave TM 6367
0 5590110865 1754 Lester Ave TM 6154 1 12/18/2023 1
5560503803 2091 N Rogers Ln TM 6050 1 7/13/2023 1
57124404S 2669 La Mirada Ave TM 6166
0 55943302S 1542 Richmond Ave TM 6284
0 57124305S 4330 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124216S 4371 San Gabriel Ave TM 6166
0 57124110S 2602 Highland Ave TM 6166
0 55943107S 1484 N Purdue Ave B TM 6284
0 56408024 1187 N Holly Ave B TM 6367
0 56408018 1196 N Holly Ave B TM 6367
0 49209615 148 Acacia Ave B NO PROJECT
0 49937314 2531 Bundy Ave
0 43030251 514 W Pico Ave B NO PROJECT
0 55844025 1291 N Whitmore Ave B TM 5472
0 30946103 4658 Bellaire Ave TM 6161
0 41037201 109 N Cindy Ave B
0 41031302 73 N Willow Ave NO PROJECT
0 49211214 261 Minnewawa Ave B
0 55311205 2652 Fremont Ave
1 10/5/20231
56108111 957 N Citadel Ave B
1 11/9/20231
49119223 1514 Gibson Ave B NO PROJECT
0 49207202 120 Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT
1 11/3/20231
49106171 227 W Sierra Ave B
0 49106171 227 W Sierra Ave C
0 49106171 237 Sierra Ave B
0 49106171 237 Sierra Ave C
0 41053104 281 N Terry Ave B
0 3895
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.
56010008 1783 N Bush Ave TM 4912 0
49137001 22 N Villa Ave B 0
49137001 22 N Villa Ave C 0
49137002 18 N Villa Ave B 0
49137002 18 N Villa Ave C 0
49113103 80 N Woodworth Ave B NO PROJECT 0
49118422 1743 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT 0
49118416 1729 Bullard Ave B NO PROJECT 0
55943105S 1513 Richmond Ave B TM 6284 1 6/21/2023 1
55941020S 1744 Lester Ave B TM 6154 1 3/6/2023 1
49117107 1470 Fourth St B NO PROJECT 1 8/11/2023 1
49117122 1476 Fourth St B NO PROJECT 1 8/11/2023 1
55940012S 1735 Lester Ave TM 6154 1 2/22/2023 1
49821334 1113 Carey Ave NO PROJECT 1 3/10/2023 1
49906021 329 W Rialto Ave B NO PROJECT 1 6/15/2023 1
55933016 2017 Teague Ave TM 5550 1 3/6/2023 1
55940007S 1940 N Ezie Ave TM 6154 1 7/13/2023 1
55941018S 1762 Lester Ave TM 6154 1 7/13/2023 1
55941006S 1765 N Bundy Ave TM 6154 1 7/13/2023 1
55940008S 1919 N Ezie Ave TM 6154 1 7/13/2023 1
49212215 253 Minnewawa PM2023-003 0
56314253 1491 Alluvial MFRDR2023-001 0
0 0
0 0
3896
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.