The Project proposes to rezone the property from R -1-AH to C -P for the hotel use and alcohol sales. The City of Clovis General Plan designates the site as Office.
The estimated total number of employees is 30 to provide coverage for four planned eight - hour shifts. Site access is proposed via two driveways connecting to Magill Avenue.
A site vicinity map is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, following the text of this report. A site plan is presented in Figure 2, Site Plan. 563
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 2
3.0 STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIOD
This report includes analysis of the following intersections:
1. Peach Avenue / Spruce Avenue
2. Peach Avenue / Fir Avenue
3. Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue
4. Helm Avenue / Herndon Avenue
5. Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue
6. Villa Avenue / Herndon Avenue
7. Willow Avenue / Magill Avenue
8. Peach Avenue / Magill Avenue
9. Peach Avenue / Peach Avenue
10. Minnewawa Avenue / Alluvial Avenue
The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The peak hours are analyzed for the following conditions:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
• Near-Term With-Project Conditions (includes pending and approved projects); • Cumulative (Year 2045) With-Project Conditions.
4.0 LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROL
The existing lane configurations and intersection control at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 3, Existing Lane Configurations and Intersection Control. The lane configurations and intersection control assumed for the year 2045 analyses are presented in Figure 4, Year 2045 Lane Configurations and Intersection Control.
5.0 CITY OF CLOVIS GENERAL PLAN
The City of Clovis General Plan designates the streets at the study locations as follows:
Herndon Avenue: Expressway
Alluvial Avenue: Collector
Spruce Avenue: Local
Fir Avenue: Local
Magill Avenue: Local
Willow Avenue: Arterial
Helm Avenue: Collector
Peach Avenue: Collector
Villa Avenue: Arterial north of Herndon Avenue, Collector south of Herndon Avenue Minnewawa Avenue: Arterial
564
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 3
6.0 CEQA IMPACT ANALYSIS
6.1 Background and Significance Threshold
The City Guidelines provide guidance relative to analyzing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for purposes of determining transportation impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
For projects such as hotels, the City Guidelines identify the impact threshold as follows:
“The City will make a determination of the applicable thresholds on a case -by-case basis based on the land use type, project description, and setting. Research and development, medical offices, assisted living, and industrial projects may be evaluated similar to office projects using the VMT per employee metric. Projects such as religious institutions, regional parks, hotels, private schools and medical offices may be evaluated using the net VMT criteria similar to retail projects.”
For retail projects, the City Guidelines state the impact threshold as follows: “ A net increase in total VMT. The total VMT for the region without and with the project is calculated. The difference between the two scenarios is the net change in total VMT that is attributable to the project.”
6.2 Project-Specific VMT Analysis
The Project will generate more than 500 trips per day (see the Project Trip Generation section of this report). Therefore, the Project was not screened out with respect to transportation impacts and a Project-specific VMT analysis was performed.
Project-specific traffic modeling was performed by a COG -approved traffic modeling consultant and the results are presented in Appendix A. The modeling indicates the regional VMT with the Project is less than the regional VMT without the Project. Therefore, the Project does not create a significant transportation impact.
7.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual , 7th Edition, (HCM) defines level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A -F scale, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0-10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
565
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 4
Table 2
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service Description Average Vehicle
Delay (seconds)
A Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is very short. >10-20
C Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate. >20-35
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35-55
E Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 F Volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80 Reference for Tables 1 and 2: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022
The City of Clovis General Plan requires a minimum LOS D at intersections under the City’s jurisdiction. The City Guidelines state: “All City intersections and roadway segments shall operate at a LOS D or better under the near -term conditions, unless a finding of overriding consideration was adopted in the General Plan EIR. Under long -term conditions, all City intersections and roadway segments shall operate at a LOS D or better, except for the roadway segments adopted in the General Plan EIR to operate at LOS E or F. Exceptions to this standard may be allowed on a case by case basis where lower levels of service would result in other public benefits, such as:
a) Preserving agriculture or open space land
b) Preserving the rural/historic character of a neighborhood c) Preserving or creating a pedestrian -friendly environment in Old Town or mixed -use village districts
d) Avoiding adverse impacts to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders e) Where right-of-way constraints would make capacity expansion infeasible” For purposes of this study, a traffic issue may be identified if the addition of the traffic generated by the Project results in any one of the following:
• Triggers an intersection operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable levels of service;
• Increases the average delay for a study intersection that is already operating at unacceptable LOS.
8.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing traffic volumes were determined by performing manual turning movement counts between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday . The traffic count 566
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 5
data sheets are presented in Appendix B. The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 5, Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.
9.0 PROJECT TRIPS
9.1 Project Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 3 presents the vehicle trip generation estimates for the Project.
Table 3
Project Trip Generation Estimate
Land Use Units Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Hotel (310) 242 7.99 1,934 0.46 56:44 63 49 112 0.59 51:49 73 70 143 Hotel (310) 108 7.99 863 0.46 56:44 28 22 50 0.59 51:49 33 31 64 TOTAL: 350 - 2,797 - - 91 71 162 - - 106 101 207
Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2021 Rates are reported in trips per room
9.2 Trip Generation – Comparison with Current General Plan Designation The City of Clovis General Plan designates the site as Office. It is assumed that a 90,000 - square-foot medical office building with approximately 359 parking spaces (floor area ratio of approximately 28 percent) is feasible on the 7.45 -acre site. Table 4 presents the vehicle trip generation estimates for potential development of the site with a medical office.
Table 4
Office Trip Generation Estimate
Land Use Units Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Medical-Dental
Office Building –
Stand-Alone (720)
90.0 36.00 3,240 3.10 79:21 220 59 279 3.93 30:70 106 248 354 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2021 Rates are reported in trips per 1,000 square feet of building area.
Table 5 presents the net Project trip generation by taking the difference between the proposed Project trip generation (Table 3) and the office land use trip generation (Table 4).
Table 5
Net Project Trip Generation
Development Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Hotels 2,797 162 207
Medical Office 3,240 279 354
Difference -443 -117 -147
567
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 6
The results of the trip generation comparison indicate that the proposed Project will likely result in fewer trips than would have occurred if the site were developed in accordance with the current General Plan land use designation.
9.3 Project Parking Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition dated January 2019 were used to estimate the number of parked vehicles anticipated to be generated by the hotels based on empirical data. Table 6 presents parking generation calculations based on ITE Land Use 310, Hotel, for both weekday peak and Saturday peak conditions for General Urban conditions.
Table 6
ITE Parking Generation Estimates – General Urban
Scenario ITE Land Use ITE Code Occupied
Rooms
Peak Hour
Parking Demand
Rate Demand
Weekday Hotel 310 350 0.83 291
Saturday Hotel 310 350 1.18 413
Reference: Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2019 Rates are reported in vehicles per occupied room, assuming all rooms are occupied.
Table 7 presents parking generation calculations based on ITE Land Use 310, Hotel, for both weekday peak and Saturday peak conditions for Dense Multi-Use Urban conditions.
Table 7
ITE Parking Generation Estimates – Dense Multi-Use Urban Scenario ITE Land Use ITE Code Rooms
Peak Hour
Parking Demand
Rate Demand
Weekday Hotel 310 350 0.89 312
Saturday Hotel 310 350 0.71 249
Reference: Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2019 Rates are reported in vehicles per occupied room, assuming all rooms are occupied.
A review of the time -of-day distributions presented in the Parking Generation Manual indicates that the peak parking hour for all of the scenarios calculated above occurs between 12:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., with the exception that the peak for Saturdays in general urban/suburban areas (Table 6) occurred at about 9:00 p.m. and then declines substantially by 11:00 p.m. This suggests the data for Saturdays in Table 6 are likely influenced by large events such as wedding receptions and banquets.
It appears reasonable to estimate the peak parking demand will be on the order of 291 to 312 parking spaces in the absence of large events when the hotels are at 100-percent occupancy.
9.4 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The regional distribution of Project trips was estimated using the results of a select zone analysis utilizing the Fresno County travel model maintained by the Fresno Council of Governments (COG), engineering judgment based on knowledge of, and familiarity with, the 568
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 7
Project site area, the traffic counts, the location and configuration of site access points, and available travel routes. A COG -approved traffic modeling consultant performed the Project - specific traffic modeling and the results are presented in Appendix A.
The estimated percentage distribution of Project trips is presented in Figure 6, Peak -Hour Project Traffic Distribution Percentages. The peak -hour trips presented in Table 3 were assigned to the adjacent road network in accordance with the trip distribution percentages in Figure 6. The peak -hour Project traffic volumes at the study intersections for existing -plus- Project and near -term conditions are presented in Figure 7, Peak -Hour Project Traffic Volumes (Near -Term Scenarios). In the future conditions, when the intersection of Helm and Herndon Avenues has been opened to left turns from the southbound approach, the Project trips are expected to be as presented in Figure 8, Peak-Hour Project Traffic Volumes (Future Scenario).
10.0 EXISTING-PLUS-PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing-Plus-Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 9, Existing-Plus-Project Peak- Hour Traffic Volumes. The values in Figure 9 were determined by adding the values in Figures 5 and 7.
11.0 PENDING/APPROVED PROJECTS
Projects that were pending or approved but not yet occupied when the traffic counts were performed are considered in the analyses. City staff indicated the following projects should be considered in the analyses:
• SPR 2019 -006: 10,143 -square-foot m edical office building northwest of the intersection of Villa and Herndon Avenues.
• SPR 2023-008: two 44,376-square-foot medical office buildings (total 88,752 square feet) on the north side of Magill Avenue at Timmy Avenue.
The trip generation estimates for the cumulative projects are presented in Table 8.
Table 8
Pending/Approved Trip Generation Estimate
Land Use Area Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Medical-
Dental Office
Building -
Stand-Alone
(720)
10,143
sq. ft. 36.00 366 3.10 79:21 25 7 32 3.93 30:70 12 28 40 88,752
sq. ft. 36.00 3,196 3.10 79:21 218 58 276 3.93 30:70 105 244 349 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers 2021 Rates are reported in trips 1,000 square feet of building area
569
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 8
12.0 NEAR-TERM TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Peak-hour near-term with -Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10, Near -Term With-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes and include trips expected to be generated by the specified cumulative projects.
13.0 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2045 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Cumulative traffic volumes for the year 2045 were estimated based on information available from the COG travel model. The base year and horizon year model output is presented in Appendix A. Future weekday turning movements were estimated based on the methods presented in Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled “Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design.” Cumulative With-Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 11, Cumulative (Year 2045) With-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.
14.0 INTERSECTION ANALYSES
The intersection levels of service were determined using the computer program Synchro 11, which incorporates HCM procedures for calculating levels of service. For roundabouts, the computer program Sidra Intersection 9 was utilized. The intersection analysis sheets are presented in Appendix C.
Tables 9 through 12 present the results of the intersection analyses. For signalized intersections, the overall intersection LOS and the average delay per vehicle are presented.
For one-way and two-way stop-controlled intersections, the HCM does not define an overall intersection LOS; therefore, the average delay and LOS for the approach with the greatest delay is presented. Delays and LOS worse than the target LOS are presented in bold type and are underlined.
Table 9
Intersection LOS Summary – Existing Conditions
Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Delay
(sec) LOS
Peach / Spruce One-way stop 17.2 C 23.3 C
Peach / Fir One-way stop 14.2 B 15.8 C
Willow / Herndon Signals 46.0 D 40.9 D
Helm / Herndon Signals 4.5 A 5.5 A
Peach / Herndon Signals 32.7 C 32.9 C
Villa / Herndon Signals 33.4 C 32.1 C
Willow / Magill Signals 12.0 B 21.9 C
Peach / Magill One-way stop 14.1 B 12.8 B
Peach / Peach One-way stop 11.9 B 11.6 B
Minnewawa / Alluvial Signals 31.0 C 24.4 C
570
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 9
Table 10
Intersection LOS Summary – Existing-Plus-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Delay
(sec) LOS
Peach / Spruce One-way stop 17.2 C 23.7 C
Peach / Fir One-way stop 14.3 B 15.9 C
Willow / Herndon Signals 46.8 D 41.4 D
Helm / Herndon Signals 4.4 A 5.5 A
Peach / Herndon Signals 33.7 C 35.4 D
Villa / Herndon Signals 33.7 C 32.8 C
Willow / Magill Signals 12.2 B 23.5 C
Peach / Magill One-way stop 17.8 C 16.7 C
Peach / Peach One-way stop 12.0 B 11.7 B
Minnewawa / Alluvial Signals 31.0 C 24.4 C
Table 11
Intersection LOS Summary – Near-Term With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Delay
(sec) LOS
Peach / Spruce One-way stop 17.9 C 24.8 C
Peach / Fir One-way stop 14.4 B 16.4 C
Willow / Herndon Signals 48.3 D 42.5 D
Helm / Herndon Signals 4.4 A 5.5 A
Peach / Herndon Signals 35.9 D 37.9 D
Villa / Herndon Signals 33.9 C 33.5 C
Willow / Magill Signals 15.2 B 26.1 C
Peach / Magill One-way stop 24.6 C 31.8 D
Peach / Peach One-way stop 12.2 B 12.0 B
Minnewawa / Alluvial Signals 31.5 C 24.7 C
571
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 10
Table 12
Intersection LOS Summary – Year 2045 Cumulative With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Delay
(sec) LOS
Peach / Spruce One-way stop 64.3 F >300 F
Peach / Fir One-way stop 20.3 C 50.4 F
Willow / Herndon Signals 99.9 F 95.7 F
Helm / Herndon Signals 14.4 B 14.5 B
Peach / Herndon Signals 51.0 D 43.8 D
Villa / Herndon Signals 43.5 D 44.3 D
Willow / Magill Signals 19.4 B 48.3 D
Peach / Magill One-way stop 28.1 D 41.4 E
Peach / Peach One-way stop 13.0 B 12.8 B
Minnewawa / Alluvial Signals 40.6 D 37.0 D
The results of the intersection operational analyses include an estimate of the 95 th-percentile queue lengths. The existing storage capacity (where applicable) and the calculated 95 th- percentile queue lengths are presented in Table s 13 through 16. The storage capacities reported in Table s 13 through 16 are based on measurements from available aerial photographs. Calculated 95 th-percentile queue lengths that exceed the storage capacity by more than 25 (approximate average space required for storage of each vehicle) or that are considered to be excessive are indicated in bold type and are underlined. 572
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 11
Table 13
Intersection Queuing Summary – Existing Conditions
Intersection Number of Lanes, Storage (feet), and Queue Length (feet)
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Peach /
Spruce
Lanes 1 S 1 1 1 S
Storage 1,350 175 350 470
A.M. 38 5 DNS DNS
P.M. 128 5 DNS DNS
Peach / Fir
Lanes 1 S 1 S 1 1
Storage 1,840 385 175 350
A.M. 18 DNS 8 DNS
P.M. 40 DNS 5 DNS
Willow /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1
Storage 280 1,800 220 265 1,235 140 315 560 215 250 1,110 200 A.M. 160 271 95 52 594 49 292 246 22 91 508 119
P.M. 239 520 295 126 361 122 195 330 35 110 357 65
Helm /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 3 1 2
Storage 300 1,245 1,250 200 >650
A.M. 12 46 193 14 0
P.M. 22 97 136 25 0
Peach /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Storage 285 1,300 125 150 1,765 110 235 >400 50 100+ >400 220 A.M. 155 233 0 51 539 17 92 255 0 259 215 35
P.M. 145 523 39 81 453 100 80 138 0 383 192 43
Villa /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
Storage 290 1,175 110 255 1,900 165 180 2,525 185+ 150 350 150 A.M. 138 249 56 63 510 129 103 360 44 140 122 28
P.M. 124 541 52 78 429 70 88 286 15 160 130 9
Willow /
Magill
Lanes 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 2 1
Storage Priv. Priv. 80 825 80 140 1,885 165 565 75
A.M. 60 35 23 14 0 35 443 106 248 0
P.M. 154 60 41 20 0 85 476 140 348 0
Peach /
Magill
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 910 400 >490
A.M. 18 3 DNS
P.M. 13 3 DNS
Peach /
Peach
Lanes 1 S 1 1 S 1
Storage 760 1,625 100 485
A.M. 3 DNS DNS 0
P.M. 5 DNS DNS 0
Minnewawa
/ Alluvial
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 1 1
Storage 120+ 2,525 120 150+ 2,675 120 250 2,720 250 2,550 200+ A.M. 45 226 0 77 408 32 105 208 110 424 10
P.M. 45 322 10 37 239 17 80 203 91 271 0
S: shared movement DNS: does not stop Priv.: private shopping center driveway 573
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 12
Table 14
Intersection Queuing Summary – Existing-Plus-Project Conditions Intersection Number of Lanes, Storage (feet), and Queue Length (feet)
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Peach /
Spruce
Lanes 1 S 1 1 1 S
Storage 1,350 175 350 470
A.M. 38 5 DNS DNS
P.M. 130 5 DNS DNS
Peach / Fir
Lanes 1 S 1 S 1 1
Storage 1,840 385 175 350
A.M. 18 DNS 8 DNS
P.M. 40 DNS 5 DNS
Willow /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1
Storage 280 1,800 220 265 1,235 140 315 560 215 250 1,110 200 A.M. 160 279 100 55 606 51 295 246 25 94 508 119
P.M. 239 532 305 131 371 127 200 330 39 113 357 65
Helm /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 3 1 2
Storage 300 1,245 1,250 200 >650
A.M. 12 47 197 14 0
P.M. 23 100 141 25 0
Peach /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Storage 285 1,300 125 150 1,765 110 235 >400 50 100+ >400 220 A.M. 155 233 19 125 539 17 136 261 0 259 219 35
P.M. 146 527 64 183 457 101 141 144 3 386 197 43
Villa /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
Storage 290 1,175 110 255 1,900 165 180 2,525 185+ 150 350 150 A.M. 148 255 57 63 523 131 105 360 44 140 122 31
P.M. 130 556 55 78 442 70 90 286 15 160 130 13
Willow /
Magill
Lanes 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 2 1
Storage Priv. Priv. 80 825 80 140 1,885 165 565 75
A.M. 60 36 34 14 0 36 449 113 249 0
P.M. 154 60 55 20 0 85 486 145 350 0
Peach /
Magill
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 910 400 >490
A.M. 40 3 DNS
P.M. 40 3 DNS
Peach /
Peach
Lanes 1 S 1 1 S 1
Storage 760 1,625 100 485
A.M. 3 DNS DNS 0
P.M. 5 DNS DNS 0
Minnewawa
/ Alluvial
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 1 1
Storage 120+ 2,525 120 150+ 2,675 120 250 2,720 250 2,550 200+ A.M. 45 226 0 78 408 32 105 209 110 428 10
P.M. 45 322 10 38 239 17 80 205 91 274 0
S: shared movement DNS: does not stop Priv.: private shopping center driveway
574
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 13
Table 15
Intersection Queuing Summary – Near-Term With-Project Conditions Intersection Number of Lanes, Storage (feet), and Queue Length (feet)
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Peach /
Spruce
Lanes 1 S 1 1 1 S
Storage 1,350 175 350 470
A.M. 40 5 DNS DNS
P.M. 135 5 DNS DNS
Peach / Fir
Lanes 1 S 1 S 1 1
Storage 1,840 385 175 350
A.M. 18 DNS 8 DNS
P.M. 43 DNS 5 DNS
Willow /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1
Storage 280 1,800 220 265 1,235 140 315 560 215 250 1,110 200 A.M. 164 288 148 56 615 52 309 246 25 95 508 117
P.M. 245 536 306 128 372 127 219 339 39 114 376 72
Helm /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 3 1 2
Storage 300 1,245 1,250 200 >650
A.M. 12 47 198 14 0
P.M. 23 100 143 25 0
Peach /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Storage 285 1,300 125 150 1,765 110 235 >400 50 100+ >400 220 A.M. 155 278 12 164 547 36 128 265 0 259 247 36
P.M. 154 597 74 198 449 98 141 173 77 422 231 47
Villa /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
Storage 290 1,175 110 255 1,900 165 180 2,525 185+ 150 350 150 A.M. 159 253 57 63 530 130 110 364 44 140 124 43
P.M. 157 563 62 78 450 70 92 289 15 160 132 23
Willow /
Magill
Lanes 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 2 1
Storage Priv. Priv. 80 825 80 140 1,885 165 565 75
A.M. 62 36 51 14 0 37 513 167 248 0
P.M. 174 64 108 20 43 88 535 191 367 0
Peach /
Magill
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 910 400 >490
A.M. 70 8 DNS
P.M. 143 8 DNS
Peach /
Peach
Lanes 1 S 1 1 S 1
Storage 760 1,625 100 485
A.M. 3 DNS DNS 0
P.M. 5 DNS DNS 0
Minnewawa
/ Alluvial
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 1 1
Storage 120+ 2,525 120 150+ 2,675 120 250 2,720 250 2,550 200+ A.M. 45 217 18 102 408 54 105 200 126 444 10
P.M. 45 322 10 44 239 17 80 215 91 280 0
S: shared movement DNS: does not stop Priv.: private shopping center driveway
575
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 14
Table 16
Intersection Queuing Summary – Year 2045 Cumulative With-Project Conditions Intersection Number of Lanes, Storage (feet), and Queue Length (feet)
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Peach /
Spruce
Lanes 1 S 1 1 1 S
Storage 1,350 175 350 470
A.M. 213 30 DNS DNS
P.M. 1,065 33 DNS DNS
Peach / Fir
Lanes 1 S 1 S 1 1
Storage 1,840 385 175 350
A.M. 33 DNS 13 DNS
P.M. 160 DNS 8 DNS
Willow /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1
Storage 280 1,800 220 265 1,235 140 315 560 215 250 1,110 200 A.M. 261 537 341 189 1,026 115 501 381 55 155 996 209
P.M. 379 1,019 720 340 596 256 422 716 169 230 897 230
Helm /
Herndon
Lanes 2 3 3 1 2 2
Storage 300 1,245 1,250 200 325 >650
A.M. 130 131 528 35 129 31
P.M. 173 320 438 76 167 44
Peach /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
Storage 285 1,300 125 150 1,765 110 235 >400 50 100+ >400 220 A.M. 403 366 32 176 821 149 189 405 10 246 311 55
P.M. 459 652 58 214 609 199 233 180 48 267 286 163
Villa /
Herndon
Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1
Storage 290 1,175 110 255 1,900 165 180 2,525 185+ 150 350 150 A.M. 210 319 111 76 714 170 146 539 66 205 163 52
P.M. 242 738 158 156 545 171 151 425 69 231 181 51
Willow /
Magill
Lanes 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 2 1
Storage Priv. Priv. 80 825 80 140 1,885 165 565 75
A.M. 68 40 50 16 0 87 712 213 608 16
P.M. 291 89 154 28 70 170 1,281 304 893 5
Peach /
Magill
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 910 400 >490
A.M. 83 5 DNS
P.M. 173 5 DNS
Peach /
Peach
Lanes 1 S 1 1 S 1
Storage 760 1,625 100 485
A.M. 5 DNS DNS 0
P.M. 8 DNS DNS 0
Minnewawa
/ Alluvial
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 S 1 1 1
Storage 120+ 2,525 120 150+ 2,675 120 250 2,720 250 2,550 200+ A.M. 61 276 8 124 543 77 135 304 180 596 30
P.M. 61 514 21 50 352 44 126 271 149 598 0
S: shared movement DNS: does not stop Priv.: private shopping center driveway
576
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 15
15.0 DISCUSSION
15.1 Existing Conditions
The results of the analyses indicate that the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service . The calculated 95th-percentile queues are contained within the available storage capacity, with the following exceptions:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: right-turn lane on the eastbound approach during the p.m. peak hour.
• Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach during the p.m. peak hour.
15.2 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The existing -plus-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project if none of the pending and approved projects were constructed.
This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.
The results of the analyses indicate that the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The Project will not cause the study intersections to operate worse than the target LOS.
Calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceed the available storage capacity at the following locations:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: right-turn lane on the eastbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition). • Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition) and the left-turn lane on the westbound approach during the p.m. peak hour.
Potential Improvements
The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods . The existing left -turn lane (approximately 150 feet long) is shorter than most similar left -turn lanes in median islands at signalized intersections. In order to prevent queues in the left -turn lane from backing up into the adjacent through lane , the existing left-turn lane could be lengthened to provide at least 275 feet of storage.
15.3 Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The near-term with-Project analyses represent conditions that are expected after construction of the Project and the known pending and approved projects. This scenario isolates the near - term cumulative effects of the Project and other known projects.
The results of the analyses indicate that the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The cumulative near -term projects will not cause the study intersections to operate worse than the target LOS. 577
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 16
Calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceed the available storage capacity at the following locations:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: right-turn lane on the eastbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition). • Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition) and the left-turn lane on the westbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is similar to the existing-plus-Project conditions).
• Willow Avenue / Magill Avenue : left-turn lanes on the westbound and southbound approaches during the p.m. peak hour. These queues are expected to exceed the storage capacity primarily as a result of the SPR 2023 -008 medical office buildings on the north side of Magill Avenue at Timmy Avenue.
Potential Improvements
The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods as discussed above for the existing-plus-Project conditions.
At the intersection of Willow and Magill Avenues, the length of the left -turn lane on the westbound approach could likely be extended with striping modifications. However, the length of the left-turn lane on the southbound approach appears to be constrained by the left - turn lanes on the northbound Willow Avenue approach to Herndon Avenue.
15.4 Cumulative Year 2045 With-Project Conditions
The year 2045 cumulative with-Project conditions analyses are based on the assumption that the Project has been constructed, the pending and approved projects have been constructed, and that 20 years of growth has occurred in the Clovis, Fresno, and Fresno County region as incorporated into the adopted Fresno County travel model.
The analyses indicate that the following study intersections are expected to operate worse than the target LOS D:
• Peach Avenue / Spruce Avenue : LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour s on the eastbound approach.
• Peach Avenue / Fir Avenue : LOS F during the p.m. peak hour on the westbound approach.
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • Peach Avenue / Magill Avenue : LOS E during the peak hour on the eastbound approach.
578
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 17
The calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceed the storage capacity during at least one peak hour at following locations:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: left-turn lanes on the eastbound, westbound, and northbound approaches, right-turn lane s on the eastbound, westbound, and southbound approaches, and the through lanes on the northbound approach. • Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches and right -turn lane on the westbound approach. (It should be noted that the future lane configurations include the assumption that a second left -turn lane has been constructed on the southbound approach.)
• Villa Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach and right-turn lane on the eastbound approach.
• Willow Avenue / Magill Avenue : left -turn lanes on the eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches, through lanes on the southbound approach.
Potential Improvements
The intersection of Peach and Spruce Avenues is expected to require signalization or a roundabout to operate at acceptable LOS. With signalization, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045. As a single -lane roundabout, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour in the year 2045. The queueing analyses suggest that there is no clear preferred option; therefore, the eventual improvement could be determined based on cost. Traffic signal installations at existing intersections are typically less costly than new roundabouts. The intersection analysis sheets for the improved conditions are presented in Appendix D. The improved conditions are summarized in Tables 17 and 18.
The intersection of Peach and Fir Avenues is expected to be frequently blocked by queues extending from Herndon Avenue. Furthermore, the relatively short distances between Fir and Herndon Avenues and between Fir and Spruce Avenues suggests that signalization is not an option at Fir Avenue. Therefore, it is suggested that westbound -to-southbound left turns from Fir Avenue to Peach Avenue may ultimately need to be restricted. A median worm could be constructed on Peach Avenue that would prevent left turns from Fir Avenue while allowing southbound-to-eastbound left turns to Fir Avenue.
The intersection of Willow and Herndon Avenues has been constructed to its ultimate configuration; therefore, physical improvements are not likely to be feasible. The City has considered timing improvements, such as adaptive signal control technology that adjusts signal timing in real time, to optimize traffic progression on the Herndon Avenue corridor.
Lengthening existing turn lanes may be considered to reduce the potential for queues to block through lanes.
The intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues is expected to operate at acceptable LOS; however, calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceeding 400 feet in the left -turn lane on the eastbound approach suggest that the lane may require lengthening in the future, or a second left-turn lane may be considered. The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the 579
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 18
intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods as discussed above for the existing-plus-Project conditions. The right -turn lane on the westbound approach may also benefit from lengthening in the future; however, long queues expected in the through lanes are likely to govern accessibility to the right-turn lane.
The intersection of Villa and Herndon Avenues has been constructed to its ultimate configuration; therefore, physical improvements to address queuing issues are not likely to be feasible. T he length of the left -turn lane on the southbound approach appears to be constrained by the left -turn lane on the northbound Villa Avenue approach to Fir Avenue.
The right-turn lane on the eastbound approach may benefit from lengthening in the future.
At the intersection of Willow and Magill Avenues , the length of the left -turn lane on the westbound approach could likely be extended with striping modifications. However, the lengths of the left -turn lane s on the northbound and southbound approach es appear to be constrained by other left-turn lanes.
The intersection of Peach and Magill Avenues is expected to require signalization or a roundabout to operate at acceptable LOS. With signalization, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045 . As a single -lane roundabout, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045 . Considering the approximate 400 -foot spacing to Herndon Avenue, coordination of traffic signals at Magill Avenue and at Herndon Avenue to prevent blocking of intersections may be difficult to achieve , particularly if priority if given to the Herndon Avenue corridor. Therefore, a roundabout may be the preferred alternative. The intersection analysis sheets for the improved conditions are presented in Appendix D. The improved conditions are summarized in Tables 17 and 18.
Table 17
Intersection LOS Summary
Improved Year 2045 Cumulative With-Project Conditions
Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Delay
(sec) LOS
Peach / Spruce Signals 18.8 B 18.6 B
Roundabout 7.8 A 10.8 B
Peach / Magill Signals 13.4 B 18.2 B
Roundabout 5.5 A 6.2 A
580
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 19
Table 18
Intersection Queuing Summary
Improved Year 2045 Cumulative With-Project Conditions
Intersection Number of Lanes, Storage (feet), and Queue Length (feet)
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Peach /
Spruce
Signals
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Storage 1,350 TBD TBD 350 470 TBD
A.M. 66 61 210 113 455 23
P.M. 178 77 241 220 311 39
Peach /
Spruce
Roundabout
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 1,350 350 350
A.M. 109 133 260
P.M. 270 372 174
Peach /
Magill
Signals
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 S
Storage 910 TBD TBD 400 >490
A.M. 116 21 65 82 245
P.M. 190 27 60 65 304
Peach /
Magill
Roundabout
Lanes 1 S S 1 1 S
Storage 910 400 >490
A.M. 28 55 74
P.M. 53 37 80
S: shared movement TBD: to be determined
16.0 EQUITABLE SHARE CALCULATIONS
Where required future improvements are not included in established development fees and are not the sole responsibility of a particular project, but rather a cumulative result of regional growth, the responsibility for the improvement may be determined based on equitable share calculations as presented in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies dated December 2002. The following equation was used to determine the project’s equitable share percentage at the intersection s that may require improvements to improve LOS to acceptable levels.
where:
P = The equitable share of the project’s traffic responsibility; T = The project trips generated during the peak hour of the adjacent facility; TB = The forecasted (future with project) traffic volume on the affected facility; TE = The existing traffic on the State Highway facility.
Table 19 presents equitable share responsibility calculations.
EB TT
TP −=
581
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 20
Table 19
Equitable Share Responsibility Calculations – P.M. Peak Hour Location Project
Trips
Existing
Traffic
2045
Traffic
Equitable
Share
Peach / Spruce 10 1,232 2,031 1.3%
Peach / Fir 10 1,158 1,792 1.6%
Peach / Magill 173 579 1,017 39.5%
Alternatively, the Project trips may be divided by the year 2045 traffic volume to determine the Project’s percentage of the overall traffic as presented in Table 20.
Table 20
Project Percentage of Total Trips – Year 2045 P.M. Peak Hour Location Project
Trips
2045
Traffic
Equitable
Share
Peach / Spruce 10 2,031 0.5%
Peach / Fir 10 1,792 0.6%
Peach / Magill 173 1,017 17.0%
17.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Standard traffic engineering principles and methods were employed to establish the existing conditions, to estimate the number of trips expected to be generated by the Project, and to analyze the traffic conditions that are expected to occur in the future. The conclusions of the study are summarized in the following sections.
Trip Generation
The Project is expected to generate approximately 2,797 vehicle trips per weekday (approximately 1,399 trips entering the site and 1,399 trips exiting the site). Weekday peak- hour traffic volumes are expected to be on the order of 162 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 207 trips during the p.m. peak hour.
The proposed Project will likely result in fewer trips than would have occurred if the site were developed in accordance with the current General Plan land use designation.
CEQA Impact Analysis (VMT)
Project-specific traffic modeling indicates the regional VMT with the Project is less than the regional VMT without the Project. Therefore, the Project does not create a significant transportation impact.
582
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 21
Existing Conditions
The study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service. The calculated 95th-percentile queues are contained within the available storage capacity, with the following exceptions:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: right-turn lane on the eastbound approach during the p.m. peak hour.
• Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach during the p.m. peak hour.
Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The study intersections are expected to continue to operate at levels of service very similar to the existing conditions. The Project will not cause the study intersections to operate worse than the target LOS. The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods. The existing left -turn lane (approximately 150 feet long) is shorter than most similar left -turn lanes in median islands at signalized intersections. In order to prevent queues in the left -turn lane from backing up into the adjacent through lane, the existing left -turn lane could be lengthened to provide at least 275 feet of storage.
Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service .
The cumulative near -term projects will not cause the study intersections to operate worse than the target LOS. Calculated 95th-percentile queues exceed the available storage capacity at the following locations:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: right-turn lane on the eastbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition). • Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is nearly identical to the existing condition) and the left-turn lane on the westbound approach during the p.m. peak hour (this condition is similar to the existing-plus-Project conditions).
• Willow Avenue / Magill Avenue : left -turn lanes on the westbound and southbound approaches during the p.m. peak hour. These queues are expected to exceed the storage capacity primarily as a result of the SPR 2023 -008 medical office buildings on the north side of Magill Avenue at Timmy Avenue.
The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods as discussed above for the existing-plus-Project conditions.
At the intersection of Willow and Magill Avenues, the length of the left -turn lane on the westbound approach could likely be extended with striping modifications. However, the 583
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 22
length of the left-turn lane on the southbound approach appears to be constrained by the left - turn lanes on the northbound Willow Avenue approach to Herndon Avenue.
Cumulative Year 2045 With-Project Conditions
The following study intersections are expected to operate worse than the target LOS D in the year 2045:
• Peach Avenue / Spruce Avenue : LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours on the eastbound approach.
• Peach Avenue / Fir Avenue : LOS F during the p.m. peak hour on the westbound approach.
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: LOS F during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • Peach Avenue / Magill Avenue : LOS E during the peak hour on the eastbound approach.
The calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceed the storage capacity during at least one peak hour at following locations:
• Willow Avenue / Herndon Avenue: left-turn lanes on the eastbound, westbound, and northbound approaches, right -turn lanes on the eastbound, westbound, and southbound approaches, and the through lanes on the northbound approach. • Peach Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound approaches and right -turn lane on the westbound approach. (It should be noted that the future lane configurations include the assumption that a second left -turn lane has been constructed on the southbound approach.)
• Villa Avenue / Herndon Avenue : left -turn lane on the southbound approach and right-turn lane on the eastbound approach.
• Willow Avenue / Magill Avenue : left -turn lanes on the eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches, through lanes on the southbound approach.
Potential Improvements
The intersection of Peach and Spruce Avenues is expected to require signalization or a roundabout to operate at acceptable LOS. With signalization, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045. As a single -lane roundabout, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour in the year 2045. The queueing analyses suggest that there is no clear preferred option; therefore, the eventual improvement could be determined based on cost. Traffic signal installations at existing intersections are typically less costly than new roundabouts.
The intersection of Peach and Fir Avenues is expected to be frequently blocked by queues extending from Herndon Avenue. Furthermore, the relatively short distances between Fir and Herndon Avenues and between Fir and Spruce Avenues suggests that signalization is not an option at Fir Avenue. Therefore, it is suggested that westbound -to-southbound left turns 584
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 23
from Fir Avenue to Peach Avenue may ultimately need to be restricted. A median worm could be constructed on Peach Avenue that would prevent left turns from Fir Avenue while allowing southbound-to-eastbound left turns to Fir Avenue.
The intersection of Willow and Herndon Avenues has been constructed to its ultimate configuration; therefore, physical improvements are not likely to be feasible. The City has considered timing improvements, such as adaptive signal control technology that adjusts signal timing in real time, to optimize traffic progression on the Herndon Avenue corridor.
Lengthening existing turn lanes may be considered to reduce the potential for queues to block through lanes.
The intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues is expected to operate at acceptable LOS; however, calculated 95 th-percentile queues exceeding 400 feet in the left -turn lane on the eastbound approach suggest that the lane may require lengthening in the future, or a second left-turn lane may be considered. The Project is expected to contribute to queues that may exceed the existing storage capacity in the left -turn lane on the westbound approach to the intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues during peak periods as discussed above for the existing-plus-Project conditions. The right -turn lane on the westbound approach may also benefit from lengthening in the future; however, long queues expected in the through lanes are likely to govern accessibility to the right-turn lane.
The intersection of Villa and Herndon Avenues has been constructed to its ultimate configuration; therefore, physical improvements to address queuing issues are not likely to be feasible. The length of the left -turn lane on the southbound approach appears to be constrained by the left -turn lane on the northbound Villa Avenue approach to Fir Avenue.
The right-turn lane on the eastbound approach may benefit from lengthening in the future.
At the intersection of Willow and Magill Avenues , the length of the left -turn lane on the westbound approach could likely be extended with striping modifications. However, the lengths of the left -turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches appear to be constrained by other left-turn lanes.
The intersection of Peach and Magill Avenues is expected to require signalization or a roundabout to operate at acceptable LOS. With signalization, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045. As a single -lane roundabout, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in the year 2045. Considering the approximate 400 -foot spacing to Herndon Avenue, coordination between traffic signals at Magill Avenue and at Herndon Avenue to prevent blocking of intersections may be difficult to achieve, particularly if priority if given to the Herndon Avenue corridor. Therefore, a roundabout may be the preferred alternative.
The Project may be required to pay an equitable share of future improvements if those improvements are not included in a fee program.
585
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Transportation Impact Analysis – Proposed Hotel April 22, 2024 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Herndon Avenues, Clovis, California Page 24
Thank you for the opportunity to perform this transportation impact analysis. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 11
Appendix A - Traffic Modeling
Appendix B - Traffic Count Data Sheets
Appendix C - Intersection Analyses
Appendix D - Improved Intersection Analyses
586
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
FIGURES
587
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
588
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
589
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
590
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
591
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
592
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
593
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
594
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
595
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
596
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
597
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
598
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC MODELING
599
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
VMT Results
600
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
LSA is a business name of LSA Associates, Inc.
CARLSBAD
FRESNO
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
PALM SPRINGS
POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, California 92507 951.781.9310 www.lsa.net
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: John Rowland
FROM: Ambarish Mukherjee, P.E., AICP
SUBJECT: Herndon and Peach Hotel Project Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Memorandum LSA has prepared a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Memorandum (Memo) for the proposed Herndon and Peach Hotel project (project) in the City of Clovis (City). The project will be located at the southwest corner of Herndon Ave. & Peach Ave. and fronts on Magill Ave., west of Peach Ave. in the City of Clovis. The project proposes to develop a vacant site of 7.45 acres into a hotel with 350 rooms. Based on LSA’s understanding, the project would require a General Plan Amendment (GPA).
BACKGROUND
On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for use. Among the changes to the guidelines was removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project generated VMT.
The City has adopted its Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) guidelines (guidelines) on October 17, 2022 “Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, City of Clovis, CA”, through City Resolution 22‐122. The guidelines include screening criteria, VMT analysis methodology, VMT impact thresholds, and VMT mitigation measures. Therefore, the City’s guidelines were used in the evaluation of the project’s VMT analysis.
The guidelines provide multiple screening criteria for project types and thresholds for land use projects. The project was compared with the screening criteria established in the “Project Screening” section of the guidelines to check if the project can be screened out. The following is a brief description of the project in relation with the project screening criteria:
Small Project: The guidelines state that projects generating less than 500 daily trips could be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis. The project is estimated to generate 2,797 daily trips.
Therefore, the project does not satisfy this screening criteria. Provision of Affordable Housing: The project proposes to develop a hotel which is not affordable housing. Therefore, this screening criteria does not apply to the project. Local‐Serving Retail: The project consists of hotel use and is greater than 100 KSF. Based on City’s guidelines local‐serving retail consists of groceries, medicines, fast food and casual 601
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
12/18/23 (P:\20231242_HendronPeachHtl_Peters\Traffic\HerndonPchHtl_VMTMemo.docx) 2 restaurants, fitness, and beauty services. Therefore, this screening criteria does not apply to the project.
Project Located in a High‐Quality Transit Area (HQTA): The project is not located within an HQTA; therefore, this screening criteria does not apply to the project. Project Located in Low VMT Area: This criterion is not applicable for project land use type.
As shown above, the project could not be screened out from a detailed VMT analysis. As such, pursuant to the guidelines, a detailed VMT analysis was conducted to assess the project’s VMT impact.
METHODOLOGY
The project is a hotel land use, and the guidelines recommend use of retail land use category for evaluation of hotel projects. The guidelines established use of regional total VMT under cumulative conditions as the VMT metric for evaluation of retail projects. Therefore, the project would result in a significant VMT impact if the project causes a net increase in total VMT i.e., if the total regional VMT for “with project” scenario is greater than total regional VMT for “without project” scenario under cumulative conditions. The definition of the “region” is assumed as the entire Fresno County, consistent with other VMT metric thresholds (VMT per capita and VMT per employee). However, total VMT for the City of Clovis is also provided for comparison purposes.
The guidelines recommend use of the regional travel demand model for detailed VMT analysis.
Fresno Council of Governments’ (Fresno COG’s) Activity‐Based Model (ABM) is the regional model for the city and therefore, the Fresno COG ABM was used to conduct project VMT analysis. No project cumulative scenario (2046) model run was conducted to establish the regional total VMT threshold for comparison purposes. Following is a detailed description of the VMT analysis.
Project Traffic Analysis Zone Update
The first step in preparation of this analysis was to update the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) in the model that include the project area. The Fresno COG ABM includes the ability to add or split zones.
In order to isolate the project VMT, a new zone was created in the model. The project employment was included in the newly created zone for modeling purposes. No project‐specific network modifications were required for the model run. A model run was conducted for the cumulative scenario with updated model inputs. The outputs from this updated model run were used to calculate the total regional VMT under “with project” condition.
VMT ANALYSIS
The project is a hotel and was evaluated as retail under cumulative scenario as suggested in the guidelines. Total regional /countywide VMT for “without project” condition was compared to the “with project” scenario under cumulative scenario. As shown in Table A, the regional total VMT under “with project” is lower than the “without project” under cumulative conditions. Therefore, based on the guidelines, the project will not have a significant VMT impact. 602
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
12/18/23 (P:\20231242_HendronPeachHtl_Peters\Traffic\HerndonPchHtl_VMTMemo.docx) 3 Table A: Cumulative (2046) Total Regional VMT Comparison Total Roadway VMT With Project Without Project Difference Within Fresno County 29,254,916 29,263,263 (8,347) Within City of Clovis 1,551,936 1,552,959 (1,023) Source: Fresno COG Activity Based Model (ABM)
VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
Conclusion
As mentioned before, the project consists of hotel land use. The guidelines recommend evaluation of hotel project as retail land use. Retail land uses should be evaluated using “net change” in regional VMT under cumulative scenario based on the guidelines. Therefore, the project will have a significant VMT impact if total regional VMT under “with project” conditions is greater than “without project” conditions. As shown in Table A, the project doesn’t have significant impact.
603
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
Select Zone Analysis
604
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Fresno COG 2046 Travel Model - AM Peak hour Select Zone Distribution (Herndon @ Peach Hotel) (Total Volume - Project Select Zone Volumes)
(Licensed to LSA Associates)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
01 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 0
2 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
100
Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 0
0 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
2 5
Minnewawa
4 0
0 Nees
0 Nees
1 Minnewawa
4 Alluvial
0 Allu
vial 0
Locan
0 Shaw 0
Shepherd
0 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 0Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Temperance
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Fowler
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Leonard
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Temperance
1 Barstow
0 SR 168
7 10
SR 168 0
Fowler
1 Fowler/168 0
SR 168 0
Herndon/168 0
SR 168
2 6 7
0 SR 168
0 2
SR 168
0 Herndon/168
3 SR 168
0 Shaw 0
0 0 0
SR 168 10
Shaw/168 0
SR 168
7 Shaw0
0 0
Shaw 0
SR 168
7 Shaw/168
0 0
Shaw0
SR 168 0
SR 168
2 Bullard/168
0 SR 168
7 Bullard
100
Herndon
6 0
0 9
Fowler
1 5
Fowler
1 SR 168
0 Fo
wler
/168
0 SR 168
0 0
Fowler
1 Fowler/168
0 SR 168
3 SR 168
3 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 2
0 Temperance0
Temp/168
0 0
SR 168
0 Tem
p/168
0 SR 168
3 0Temperance0
0 0
Temperance
1 Teague
0 Teague
0 Chestnut
0 Behym
er
0 0
Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 0
Teague
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Temperance
0 0
SR 41
0 Dakota
0 SR 41
0 SR 41
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Dakota
0 Fresno
0 Dakota
0 0
Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
Fresno
00 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Ashlan
10 Fresno
0 Ashlan
1 Ashlan
1 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 0
First
0 Dakota
0 0
First
0 Dakota
0 1
Ashlan
1 Ashlan
1 Ashlan
1 0
First
0 00
First
0 1
First
0 Ashlan
1 0
First
0 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 Millbrook
1Millbrook
11 Millbrook
1 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Millbrook
1 Millbrook
0 Dakota
1 00
Millbrook
000
Dakota
1 Dakota
1 Dakota
1 0
Ashlan
1 Ashlan
1 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Ashlan
1 0
1Millbrook
0 Ashlan
1 0
Millbrook
0 0
Ashlan
1 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
000
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Dakota
1 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Dakota
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 SR 168
8SR 168
8 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 SR 168 0
SR 168 8
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
01 Ashlan
0 0
0 Ashlan
1Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Ashlan
1 Cedar
0 0
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 1
Ashlan
2 Ashlan
2 Gettysburg
Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
Fresno
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw
0 0
Fresno
00 0
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0Shaw 0Shaw 0
Shaw0
Bullard/41
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Barstow
0 Fresno
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
1 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
0 First
0 Gettysburg
0 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 0
0 0
First
0 First
0 Shaw
0 0 0
0 0
Shaw 0
First
0 0 0
Shaw 0
0 0
Barstow
0 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 First
00 0
First
0 Barstow
0 First
0 Barstow
0 First
0 0
0 First
0 SR 41
0 0Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 1Bullard
0 Fresno
1 Fresno
1 0
Fresno
1 0Bullard
0 0
1Fresno
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
0 Fresno
2 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 SR 41
0 Herndon/41
0 SR 41
00 6
0SR 41
0 60
SR 41
0 SR 41
0 Fresno
2 Fresno
2 Herndon
6 7Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno0
Fresno
0 0
Herndon
9 Bullard
0 Bullard
00 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
0 Bullard
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 0
First
0 0
Bullard
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 Sierra
0 0
First
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 First
1 0
First
0 First
0 0
First
0 First
0 0
First
0 First
0 10
Herndon
2 0First
1First0
0 Herndon
10 First
0 0
0 0
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0Millbrook 0
Gettysburg
0 Millbrook 0
Millbrook 0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Shaw 0
0Shaw 0
Shaw
0Shaw 0 Shaw
0 Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Sixth
0 Bulldog
0 Sixth
0 Sixth
0 Bulldog
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Millbrook
0 0
Barstow
0 Bulldog
0 Millbrook 0
Millbrook
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
00 0
Shaw 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
00 Cam
pus
0 0
Cam
pus
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Barstow
0 0
Cedar
0 Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Barstow
1 Campus
0 Cam
pus
1 Barstow
1 0
Bullard
0 0
0 00
Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 0
Bullard
0 Millbrook
0 00
Bullard
0 Millbrook
0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 0
Bullard
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
000
Millbrook
0 Sierra
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 00
Herndon
10 Millbrook
0 Herndon
2 0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 0
Bullard
0 Cedar
0 1
0 Cedar
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Cedar
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar11
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 10
Cedar
0 0
Herndon
10 Herndon
2 1
Herndon
10 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 SR 168
0 Ashlan
2 Ashlan
2 SR 168
0 2
Ashlan
0 2SR 168
7 SR 168
0 SR 168 10
Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 1
Chestnut
0 0 0
0 0
Dakota
0 Chest-Will
0 Dakota
0 0Chest-Will
0 Dakota
0 0
Ashlan
0 Chestnut
0 Ashlan
0 Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
Winery
0 0Chest_Will
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Chest_Will
1 Winery
0 Winery
0Winery
0 Winery
0Winery
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 0
Peach
0 Peach
0 0
Ashlan
0 Willow
0 Willow
0 0
Ashlan
0 Willow
0Willow
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
0 Ashlan
0Peach
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Peach
0Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Gettysburg
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 00
Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
00 Gettysburg
0 0
Maple
0 Gettysburg
0 Maple
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 0
Shaw 0
Maple
00 Shaw 0Campus
00 Cam
pus
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
Shaw0
0 Shaw 0
Campus
0 Campus
0 Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Shaw 0
Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Cam
pus
1 Barstow
1 Barstow
1 1
Campus
0 Barstow
1 Barstow
1 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Chestnut
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Willow
1 0
Barstow
0 Sierra
0 Maple
0 Sierra
0 Maple
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
2 Maple
2 Maple
2 Maple
2 Maple
0 2
Herndon
10 Maple
2 Herndon
3 1
Chestnut
35 Chestnut
5 Chestnut
0 Bullard
1 Chestnut
1 Bullard
1 0
Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Sierra
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Sierra
0 0
0 Sierra
0 1
Willow
1 Bullard
1 Bullard
0 Willow
2 Bullard
0 Willow
0Willow
2Willow
2 Sierra
1 1
Sierra
1 1
Willow
2 Sierra
12 Willow
2 0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
111
Chestnut
1 3
0 Herndon
14 Chestnut
6 Chestnut6
3 Willow
22 15
Willow
2 0
Herndon
19 Willow
1 1
Willow
1 0
Willow
0 Gettysburg
0 Willow
0Willow
00 Willow
0 Willow
00 Santa Ana
0 Willow
0 Willow
0 Santa Ana
0 0
Willow
1 Shaw0
0 Shaw 0Willow
0 0
Shaw
0 0 Shaw 0
Peach
1 Peach
1 0
Peach
1 Santa Ana
0 Peach
1 0
Shaw 0
0 Shaw 1
Willow
1 0
0 Willow
1 Barstow
0Willow
1 0
Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Santa Ana
0 Santa Ana
0 2 Shaw 1
Villa
2 00000
Minnewawa
0 Santa Ana
0 07 Shaw 8
Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
8 Shaw0
Shaw
8 8
Minnewawa
8 Villa
2 0
Villa
2 Villa
22 Villa
2 Villa
6 Barstow
3 6
Villa
6 Villa
6 Villa
6 Villa
6 3
Barstow
3 Minnewawa
9 Minnewawa
9 Minnewawa
9Barstow
2 Minnewawa
7 Barstow
2 7Minnewawa
77 Minnewawa
7 Minnewawa
7 Bullard
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 1
Sierra
1 Sierra
1 1
Bullard
0 5
Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Peach
1Peach
32 Sierra
31 Peach
32 Peach
32Peach
32 Peach
35 Herndon
9 Peach
65 Herndon
16 Peach
7Fir 0
Peach
7 Peach
7 Peach
3 Fir 0
Herndon
9 Bullard
10 Bullard
6 Villa
6 Villa
30 Villa
30 Villa
30 Villa
30Villa
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
31 Villa
0 Villa
0 Sierra
1 Bullard
6 0
2 Bullard
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 1
Sierra
1 Villa
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 0
Villa
0Villa
0 Villa
0 Fir 0
1 Herndon
9 Villa
5 Villa
5 Vil/Minnew 5
Herndon
9 Minnewawa 1
5 Herndon
9 0 0
Alluvial
0 Alluvial
2 Fresno
2 2
El Paso
2 Fresno
0 El Paso
0Fresno
0 1
Fresno
0 Nees
0 2
2 2
El Paso
0 El Paso
0 0
Nees
1 Fresno
0 Nees
1 El Paso
0 0
El Paso
00 Nees
1 El Paso
0 Fresno
0 Cole
0 Fresno
0 0
Fresno
0 Friant 0
Audubon
0 Cole 0
Cole 0
0 Friant
0 0
Audubon
0Friant 0
Audubon
0 Audubon
0 Cole 0 2
Alluvial
2 0
First
1 First
0 2 First
0 First
0 2
Nees 0
Nees
1 0
First
0 1 First
0 0
Nees
1 Nees
0 Audubon
0 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 0
Nees
1 Nees
1 Audubon0
0 Audubon0
0 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
0 0
Shepherd
0Friant
0 0
FtW
ashingt
0 Friant
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Cole
0 Shepherd
0 Perrin 0
Shepherd
0Perrin 0
0 0
0 Friant
0 Cham
plain
0 FtWashingt
0 Cham
plain
0 0
Cham
plain
0 0
0 Cham
plain
0 FtWashingt 0
0 Cham
plain
0 0
Champlain
0 FtWashingt 0
FtWashingt 0
FtWashingt 0
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 2
Alluvial
2 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Alluvial
2 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Nees
1 Millbrook
00 Millbrook
00 Ne
es
1 Millbrook
0 Alluvial
4 Alluvial
4 Nees
1 0
Nees
1 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
00 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Teague
0 Millbrook
0 Teague
0 0
Millbrook
00 0
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
4 0
4Cedar
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 1
Cedar
0 Nees
1 Nees
1 Alluvial
4 Alluvial
4 4
4 4
4 4
Alluvial
4 0
1 Nees
1 0
0 Cedar
00 00
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Teague
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Cole 0
0 Cole 0
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 0
Millbrook
00 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Perrin 0
0 Champlain
0 Champlain0
Perrin 0
Shepherd
0 0 Cham
plain
0 0 Champlain
0N. M
illbroo 0
N. Millbroo
0 N. Millbroo
0N. Millbroo
00 N. Millbroo
0 N. Millbroo
0 N. Millbroo
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 0
Perrin
0 Cedar
0 Perrin
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Cedar
0 0
Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Behym
er
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Alluvial
5Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 0
Maple
0 5
5 5
5 Alluvial
5 5
Maple
00 Maple
00Maple
00 Nees
1 Maple
0 Nees 0Nees
1 0
Nees
1 Nees
0 Alluvial
5 4
Chestnut
1 Alluvial
0 1
Chestnut
1 Nees
1 10
Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 0
1 Nees
0 Chestnut
1 Maple
00 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Teague
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
0 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
Chestnut
1 Teague
0 0
Alluvial
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Alluvial
0 0
11 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
Willow
1 Teague
0 Maple
0 Maple
00 Shepherd
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 0 Shepherd
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
0 Shepherd
0 1
Shepherd
0 0
Chestnut
1 Chestnut
0 0
Chestnut
1 Chestnut
0 Chestnut0
Chestnut0
Maple
0 Perrin
0 Maple
0 Maple 0
Maple/Chest
0 Maple/Chest0
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Maple
0 0
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 0
0 Chestnut
0 Perrin 0
Chestnut 0
Chestnut
0 0
Perrin 0
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Chestnut 0
Shepherd
0 0
Shepherd
0 Willow
2 Willow
2 Shepherd
0 0
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Willow
0 Behym
er
0 Willow
0 Behym
er
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
1 Alluvial
1 0 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Nees
0 Peach
3 Peach
3 Peach
2 Alluvial
0 Peach
2 Peach
2 Peach
2 Peach
2 Peach
22 Nees
0 Peach
2 Peach
1 Nees
0 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Teague
1 Peach
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Minnewawa
1 0
Alluvial
0 Alluvial
1 00
Alluvial
1 1
Minnewawa
000
0 Minnewawa
0 Teague
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Sylmar
0 Sylmar
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Peach
Shepherd
0 0
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Clovis
0Clovis
2 0
Clovis
3 Clovis
3 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Clovis
3 0
Clovis
3 Ashlan
0Clovis
3 Ashlan
0 Clovis
3 Clovis
3 0
0 Ashlan 0
Clovis
3 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0Sierra Vist
0 0
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 Ashlan
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Fowler
0Fowler
0 Dakota
0 Fowler
0 Ashlan
00 Ashlan
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 0Fowler
0 Gettysburg
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0
00 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
00 Gettysburg
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Armstrong
0 Ashlan
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 00
Ashlan
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
0 0 0
0 Santa Ana
0 Shaw
8 8
1 Shaw
8 Shaw1
Shaw 8Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Clovis
3 3
0 Clovis
3 Clovis
3 1
3 Santa Ana
1 Clovis
3 0
Santa Ana
1 4
Clovis
4 3
Shaw 4Clovis
2 Shaw 4
Clovis
2 Shaw 4
Barstow
2 Barstow
2 Barstow
2 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Barstow
2 Woodworth
0 Barstow
2 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 0
Clovis
2 Clovis
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 0
Santa Ana
0 0
Santa Ana
0 0
Sierra Vist
0 2 Shaw 0
Cole
0 Sierra Vist
0 0
Sierra Vist 0
0 0
Shaw 0
Shaw0
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 0
Shaw
0Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Barstow
0 Sunnyside
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Sunnyside
001
Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
1 0
Bullard
0 Bullard 0
Bullard 0Bullard 0Bulard/5th
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 0
Fifth 0
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0Sierra
1 Sierra
1 0
Clovis
0 Fifth
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Fifth 0
Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Third
0 Fifth 0
Third
0 Third
0 Third
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
0 Sierra
1 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0 Herndon
9 Clovis
0 Herndon
6 0
0 6
6 0 Herndon
6 Herndon
6 Clovis
0 0
Clovis
0 Clovis
00Clovis
0 Herndon
6 Fifth
0 Third
0 Third
0 Fifth 0
Third
0 Third
0 Third
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
1 Bullard
0 Sunnyside
1 0
Bullard
0 Sunnyside
111
Sunnyside
1 Tollhouse
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 0
Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
1 Tollhouse 0
0 Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
1 Tollhous
e 0
Tollhouse
0 0
Herndon
6 Herndon
6 Sunnyside0
Sunnyside
0 0
Sunnyside
111
Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
11 Herndon
6 Fowler
0 Fowler
00 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0 Fowler
0 Shaw0
0 Shaw 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 Barstow
00 0 Fowler
0 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
000
Armstrong
00 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
00 Shaw 0
Armstrong
00Armstrong
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Barstow
0Armstrong
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0
Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 1 Bullard
0 Fowler
1Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Fowler
11 Tollhouse
0 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Sierra
0 Fowler
1 Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Fowler
0 Herndon
4 0
Herndon
5 Fowler/168
0 Herndon
4 Tollhouse
0 Tollhouse
0 Tollhouse
0 00
Bullard
0 Armstrong
000
Bullard
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0Armstrong
0 Sierra
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Sierra
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Armstrong
11 Tollhouse
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 1
1 Herndon
4 1
Herndon
3 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 0
0Herndon
4 Tollhouse
0 Temperance
0 1
Dakota
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Temperance
1 0
Ashlan
0 0
1 Temperance
1 Gettysburg
0 0
1 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Locan
0 Gettysburg
0 Locan
0 Ashlan
0 0
De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 0
Ashlan
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
1 Shaw0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Locan
0 Shaw0
Locan
0 Shaw 1
Shaw0
De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Shaw 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 0
Locan
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 De Wolf
0 Barstow
0 De Wolf
0 Barstow
0 0
1 Bullard
0 Temperance
1 Temperance
2 0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Temperance
2 Bullard
0 Temperance
1 Temperance
1 Herndon
2 0
Herndon
3 Herndon
3 3
Herndon
2 Herndon
2 Herndon
2 Herndon
2 Locan
0 Locan
0 Bullard
0 0
De Wolf
1 De Wolf
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
1 De Wolf
1 0
De Wolf
1 Locan
0 Herndon
2 Locan
0 Herndon
2 Herndon
2 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
0 Herndon
2 De Wolf
0 Herndon
1 Leonard
0 Shaw0
Sha
Barstow
0 Leonard
0Leonard
0 Bullard
1 Leonard
1 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 He
Leonard
0 Leonard0
Alluvial
1 Alluvial
1Clovis
0 0
Nees
0 00
Clovis
0 Clovis0
1 Alluvial
1 Alluvial
1 Nees
0 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Alluvial
1 0
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Alluvial
1 Sunnyside
0Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Nees
0 Nees
0 1
Alluvial
1 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Teague
0 0
Sunnyside
0 Clovis
0 Perrin
0 Shepherd
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0Sunnyside
0 Shepherd
3 Shepherd
0 Sunnyside
0 Perrin0
Alluvial
1 Fowler
2 Alluvial
0 1
Fowler
22 Fowler
2 Nees
0 Nees
0 Fowler
2 Fowler
0 Teague
2 Teague
0 Fowler
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 000
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Nees
0 Temperance
0 0
Teague
2 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Behym
er
0 Tollhouse 0Nees
0 Tollhouse
0 Locan
0 Alluvial
0 Tollhouse
0 Locan
0 Nees
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial 0
Alluvial
0 De Wolf
0 Tollhouse 0
De Wolf
0 Tollhouse
0 Nees
0 Tollhouse
0 Shepherd
0 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 Shepherd
0 0
Windmill
0 0
Alluvial
0Nees
0 Alluvial
1 Leonard
0 Leonard
1 Alluvial
1 Nees
0 Leonard
1 Leonard
1 0
Temperance
0 Fowler
0 0
Temp/168
1 Temperance
0 0
SR 168 10
Bullard/168
10 Bullard/168
2 Bullard
0 2
Bullard
2 Bullard
5 Villa
30 Bullard
5 Bullard
5 0
Bullard
0 Bullard/168 0
Temperance
1 Temperance
1 Nees
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler/168
0 1 Nees
1 SR 168 0
Alluvial
0 SR 168
2 Nees1
Tollhouse 0
Tollhouse
0 Owens Mt Pkwy
1 Owens/168
0 Alluvial
0 Teague
0 0
Teague
1 2
Herndon/168 0
0 1
Nees
0 Tem
p/
16 8
0 Willow
1 Locan
0 Nees
0 Perrin
0 Willow
1 Willow
1 Perrin
0 Fowler
1 0
0 Teague
0 0
Willow
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 Chestnut
1 Temperance
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Willow
2 Leonard
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 0
0 Willow
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 Leonard
0 Temperance
1 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Willow
2 Pryor
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
3 Peach
0 Shepherd
0 0
Behym
er
0 0
Plym
outh
0 0
Shepherd
0 Villa
0 Herndon
4 SR 168
2 0
Clovis 0
Clovis
1 Shaw 0
0 Shepherd
0 0
Chestnut
0 Behym
er
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 Gettysburg
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Teague
0 Willow
1 Shepherd
0 0
Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Teague
0 3
0 0
Temperance
1 0 Alluvial 0
1 0Nees
1 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 0
Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague 0
0 0
Clovis
0 1
Willow
4 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 SR 168 0
SR 168
7 SR 41
0 SR 41
0 0
Armstrong
0 Alluvial
0 Willow
1 Alluvial
0 0
Friant
0 0
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 0
Peach
7 0
Fowler
0 De Wolf
0 0
Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Locan
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Shepherd
0 Minnewawa
0 6
2 Villa
6 0
Locan
0 Shepherd
00 Clovis
0 Teague
1 Peach
35 SR 168
0 SR 168 2
Shaw/168
0 Shaw/168 0
Bullard/168
5 Herndon/168
2 1
0 0
Shaw0
Shaw1
0 Clovis
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Alluvial
4 Alluvial
4 Bullard
1 SR 41
0 Cedar
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 Nees
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Peach
0 Bullard
1 Bullard
1 Peach35
Shaw/410
Herndon
16 Herndon
4 Herndon
4 Herndon
4 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Willow
11 Willow
1 Willow
1 5
0 Chest_Will
1 Chest-Will
1 Clovis
0 Fowler
0 0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Alluvial
0 Temperance
1 Leonard
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
11 Shepherd
0 Peach
0 Sylmar
0 3
Minnewawa
1 Shepherd
1 Shepherd
3 0
Shepherd
0 Windmill
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shephe
0 0
SR 168
0 Willow
1 7
Shaw/168
0 SR 168
0 3
0 0
1 1
0 1
Chestnut
0 0
0 0
0 Campus
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Owens/168
0 Tollhouse
0 De Wolf
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Locan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Willow
0 0
Temperance
0 Bullard/410
Ashlan/410
0 2
Sierra
1 0
0 0
Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Dakota
0 Campus
0 0 00 0
Fresno
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Alluvial
4 Leonard
0 0
0 0 0
0 1
Ashlan
1 Ashlan
0 SR 168 0
Alluvial
5 Cam
pus
1 Campus
0 Campus
0 0
Alluvial
5 5
0 Millbrook
0 Willow
1 0
Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Ashlan
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial 0
De Wolf
0 Alluvial
0 Owens Mt Pkwy
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Behym
er
0 Peach
0 Plym
outh
0 Plym
outh
0 Peach
0 Perrin
0 Clovis
0Clovis
0 Pryor
0 Pryor0
Clovis
0 Marion 0
Behym
er
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 Plym
outh
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Sylmar
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Marion
0 Plymouth
0 Plymouth
0 W
indm
ill
0 Windmill
0 Windmill
0 605
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Fresno COG 2046 Travel Model - PM Peak hour Select Zone Distribution (Herndon @ Peach Hotel) (Total Volume - Project Select Zone Volumes)
(Licensed to LSA Associates)
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
3 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
100
Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 0
1 Chestnut
2 Chestnut
3 Chestnut
6 5
Minnewawa
1 0
0 Nees
1 Nees
0 Minnewawa
1 Alluvial
0 Allu
vial 0
Locan
0 Shaw 0
Shepherd
0 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 0Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Temperance
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Fowler
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Leonard
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Temperance
1 Barstow
0 SR 168
9 4
SR 168 0
Fowler
0 Fowler/168 0
SR 168 0
Herndon/168 0
SR 168
1 8 6
1 SR 168
0 3
SR 168
0 Herndon/168
5 SR 168
1 Shaw 0
0 0 0
SR 168 4
Shaw/168 0
SR 168
9 Shaw0
0 0
Shaw 0
SR 168
9 Shaw/168
0 0
Shaw0
SR 168 0
SR 168
1 Bullard/168
0 SR 168
9 Bullard
40 Herndon
8 0
0 14
Fowler
0 6
Fowler
0 SR 168
1 Fo
wler
/168
0 SR 168
1 0
Fowler
0 Fowler/168
0 SR 168
5 SR 168
5 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0
0 Temperance1
Temp/168
0 0
SR 168
1 Tem
p/168
1 SR 168
5 1Temperance0
0 0
Temperance
2 Teague
0 Teague
0 Chestnut
0 Behym
er
0 0
Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 0
Teague
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Temperance
0 0
SR 41
0 Dakota
0 SR 41
0 SR 41
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Dakota
0 Fresno
0 Dakota
0 0
Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
Fresno
00 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Ashlan
00 Fresno
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 0
First
0 Dakota
0 0
First
0 Dakota
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
First
0 00
First
0 1
First
0 Ashlan
1 0
First
0 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 Millbrook
0Millbrook
00 Millbrook
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Dakota
0 00
Millbrook
000
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 0
Ashlan
1 Ashlan
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Ashlan
0 0
0Millbrook
0 Ashlan
0 1
Millbrook
0 1
Ashlan
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
000
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Dakota
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Dakota
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 SR 168
3SR 168
3 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 SR 168 0
SR 168 3
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
00 Ashlan
2 0
0 Ashlan
0Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Ashlan
0 Cedar
0 0
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Gettysburg
Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
Fresno
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw
0 0
Fresno
00 0
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0Shaw 0Shaw 0
Shaw0
Bullard/41
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Barstow
1 Fresno
0 Barstow
1 Barstow
1 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
0 First
0 Gettysburg
0 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 0
0 0
First
0 First
0 Shaw
0 0 0
0 0
Shaw 0
First
0 0 0
Shaw 0
1 0
Barstow
1 0
First
0 First
0 First
0 First
00 1
First
0 Barstow
1 First
0 Barstow
1 First
0 0
0 First
0 SR 41
0 0Bullard
1 0
0 Bullard
1 0Bullard
1 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 0
Fresno
0 0Bullard
1 0
0Fresno
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Fresno
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 SR 41
0 Herndon/41
0 SR 41
00 5
0SR 41
0 50
SR 41
0 SR 41
0 Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Herndon
5 5Fresno
0 Fresno
0 Fresno0
Fresno
0 0
Herndon
6 Bullard
1 Bullard
10 0
Bullard
1 Bullard
1 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 1
0 Bullard
1 First
0 First
0 First
0 0
First
0 0
Bullard
1 First
0 First
0 First
0 Sierra
0 0
First
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 First
0 0
First
0 First
0 0
First
0 First
0 0
First
0 First
1 6
Herndon
3 0First
0First0
0 Herndon
7 First
0 0
0 0
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0Millbrook 0
Gettysburg
0 Millbrook 0
Millbrook 0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Shaw 0
0Shaw 0
Shaw
0Shaw 0 Shaw
0 Barstow
1 0
Barstow
1 0
Barstow
1 Sixth
0 Bulldog
0 Sixth
0 Sixth
0 Bulldog
0 1
Barstow
0 1
Millbrook
1 0
Barstow
0 Bulldog
0 Millbrook 1
Millbrook
1 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
00 0
Shaw 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Shaw 0
00 Cam
pus
0 0
Cam
pus
0 0
Barstow
0 0
Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Barstow
0 0
Cedar
0 Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Barstow
0 Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Barstow
0 1
Bullard
1 1
0 00
Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 0
Bullard
1 Millbrook
0 10
Bullard
1 Millbrook
0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 0
Bullard
1 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
000
Millbrook
0 Sierra
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 00
Herndon
7 Millbrook
0 Herndon
4 0 Bullard
1 Bullard
1 1
Bullard
0 Cedar
0 3
0 Cedar
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Cedar
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 Cedar00
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0 7
Cedar
1 0
Herndon
7 Herndon
4 0
Herndon
7 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 SR 168
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 SR 168
0 0
Ashlan
0 0SR 168
6 SR 168
2 SR 168 4
Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 1
Chestnut
0 0 0
0 0
Dakota
0 Chest-Will
0 Dakota
0 0Chest-Will
0 Dakota
0 0
Ashlan
0 Chestnut
0 Ashlan
0 Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
Winery
0 0Chest_Will
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Chest_Will
1 Winery
0 Winery
0Winery
0 Winery
0Winery
0 0
Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 0
Peach
0 Peach
0 0
Ashlan
0 Willow
0 Willow
0 0
Ashlan
0 Willow
0Willow
0 Gettysburg
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
0 Ashlan
0Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Peach
1 Gettysburg
0 1
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
1 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 00
Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
00 Gettysburg
0 0
Maple
0 Gettysburg
0 Maple
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 0
Shaw 0
Maple
00 Shaw 0Campus
00 Cam
pus
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
Shaw0
0 Shaw 1
Campus
0 Campus
0 Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Shaw 1
Campus
0 Cam
pus
0 Cam
pus
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0
Campus
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Shaw 1
1 Chestnut
1 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Shaw 0
0 Willow
1 0
Barstow
0 Sierra
0 Maple
0 Sierra
0 Maple
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 1
Herndon
8 Maple
0 Herndon
5 1
Chestnut
75 Chestnut
5 Chestnut
0 Bullard
3 Chestnut
1 Bullard
2 0
Chestnut
0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Sierra
0 Chestnut
0 Chestnut
0 Sierra
0 0
0 Sierra
0 2
Willow
1 Bullard
1 Bullard
0 Willow
3 Bullard
0 Willow
0Willow
3Willow
3 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 1
Willow
1 Sierra
31 Willow
1 0Chestnut
0 Chestnut
2 Chestnut
222
Chestnut
2 7
0 Herndon
16 Chestnut
5 Chestnut5
7 Willow
11 18
Willow
3 0
Herndon
18 Willow
3 1
Willow
3 0
Willow
0 Gettysburg
0 Willow
0Willow
00 Willow
0 Willow
00 Santa Ana
0 Willow
0 Willow
0 Santa Ana
0 0
Willow
1 Shaw0
1 Shaw 0Willow
1 0
Shaw
0 0 Shaw 0
Peach
1 Peach
1 0
Peach
1 Santa Ana
0 Peach
1 0
Shaw 0
1 Shaw 1
Willow
1 1
0 Willow
1 Barstow
0Willow
1 0
Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Santa Ana
0 Santa Ana
0 2 Shaw 0
Villa
2 00000
Minnewawa
0 Santa Ana
0 01 Shaw 1
Minnewawa
0 Minnewawa
2 Shaw0
Shaw
1 2
Minnewawa
2 Villa
2 0
Villa
2 Villa
22 Villa
2 Villa
3 Barstow
1 3
Villa
4 Villa
3 Villa
4 Villa
4 1
Barstow
1 Minnewawa
4 Minnewawa
4 Minnewawa
4Barstow
1 Minnewawa
3 Barstow
1 3Minnewawa
33 Minnewawa
3 Minnewawa
3 Bullard
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
3 Sierra
3 Sierra
3 3
Sierra
3 Sierra
3 3
Bullard
0 7
Sierra
3 Sierra
3 Peach
1Peach
24 Sierra
20 Peach
24 Peach
24Peach
24 Peach
26 Herndon
12 Peach
74 Herndon
20 Peach
9Fir 0
Peach
9 Peach
9 Peach
5 Fir 0
Herndon
12 Bullard
4 9
Bullard
2 Villa
4 Villa
18 Villa
18 Villa
18 Villa
18Villa
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
20 Villa
0 Villa
0 Sierra
1 Bullard
2 0
1 Bullard
0 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 1
Sierra
1 Villa
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 0
Villa
0Villa
0 Villa
0 Fir 0
5 Herndon
7 Villa
6 Villa
6 Vil/Minnew 6
Herndon
7 Minnewawa 5
6 Herndon
7 2 2
Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Fresno
0 0
El Paso
0 Fresno
0 El Paso
0Fresno
0 0
Fresno
0 Nees
0 2
2 2
El Paso
0 El Paso
0 0
Nees
0 Fresno
0 Nees
0 El Paso
0 0
El Paso
00 Nees
0 El Paso
0 Fresno
0 Cole
0 Fresno
0 0
Fresno
0 Friant 0
Audubon
1 Cole 0
Cole 0
1 Friant
0 0
Audubon
1Friant 0
Audubon
0 Audubon
1 Cole 0 2
Alluvial
2 0
First
0 First
0 2 First
0 First
0 2
Nees 0
Nees
0 0
First
0 1 First
0 0
Nees
1 Nees
0 Audubon
1 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 0
Nees
1 Nees
1 Audubon1
1 Audubon0
1 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
Cole 0
0 0
Shepherd
0Friant
0 0
FtW
ashingt
0 Friant
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Cole
0 Shepherd
0 Perrin 0
Shepherd
0Perrin 0
0 0
0 Friant
0 Cham
plain
0 FtWashingt
0 Cham
plain
0 0
Cham
plain
0 0
0 Cham
plain
0 FtWashingt 0
0 Cham
plain
0 0
Champlain
0 FtWashingt 0
FtWashingt 0
FtWashingt 0
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 2
Alluvial
2 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Alluvial
2 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Nees
1 Millbrook
00 Millbrook
00 Ne
es
2 Millbrook
1 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Nees
2 0
Nees
2 Millbrook
1 Millbrook
10 Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 Teague
0 Millbrook
0 Teague
0 0
Millbrook
00 0
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
2 0
2Cedar
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 2
Cedar
0 Nees
2 Nees
2 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 2
2 2
2 2
Alluvial
2 0
2 Nees
2 0
0 Cedar
00 00
Cedar
0 Cedar
0 0
Cedar
1 Teague
1 0
Cedar
0 Cedar
1 Cedar
0 Teague
1 Teague
1 Teague
1 Teague
1 Teague
1 Cole 0
0 Cole 0
Millbrook
0 Millbrook
0 0
Millbrook
00 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Perrin 0
0 Champlain
1 Champlain0
Perrin 0
Shepherd
0 0 Cham
plain
1 0 Champlain
1N. M
illbroo 1
N. Millbroo
1 N. Millbroo
1N. Millbroo
11 N. Millbroo
1 N. Millbroo
1 N. Millbroo
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Cedar
0 Cedar
0Cedar
0 0
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 0
Perrin
0 Cedar
1 Perrin
1 Cedar
1 Cedar
1 Cedar
1 Perrin
1 Perrin
1 Cedar
0 0
Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Perrin
1 Perrin
1 Perrin
1 Behym
er
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 Alluvial
4Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 1
Maple
1 4
4 4
4 Alluvial
4 4
Maple
11 Maple
11Maple
11 Nees
1 Maple
1 Nees 0Nees
1 0
Nees
1 Nees
1 Alluvial
4 2
Chestnut
3 Alluvial
0 3
Chestnut
3 Nees
1 30
Chestnut
3 Chestnut
3 0
3 Nees
0 Chestnut
2 Maple
11 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 Teague
0 Maple
1 Maple
1 Maple
0 Maple
1 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 2
0 Chestnut
2 Chestnut
2 Chestnut
2 Teague
2 Teague
2 1
Chestnut
2 Teague
0 0
Alluvial
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Alluvial
0 0
11 Teague
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 0
Willow
1 Teague
0 Maple
0 Maple
00 Shepherd
1 Maple
0 Maple
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
1 0 Shepherd
1 Maple
0 Maple
0 Maple
0 0
Maple
0 Maple
0 Shepherd
1 2
Shepherd
0 0
Chestnut
2 Chestnut
0 0
Chestnut
2 Chestnut
1 Chestnut1
Chestnut1
Maple
0 Perrin
0 Maple
0 Maple 0
Maple/Chest
0 Maple/Chest1
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Maple
1 0
1 Maple
1 Maple
1 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 0
0 Chestnut
0 Perrin 0
Chestnut 0
Chestnut
0 0
Perrin 0
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Chestnut 0
Shepherd
0 1
Shepherd
1 Willow
3 Willow
3 Shepherd
0 1
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Willow
1 Behym
er
0 Willow
1 Behym
er
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 0 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Nees
0 Peach
5 Peach
5 Peach
3 Alluvial
0 Peach
3 Peach
3 Peach
3 Peach
3 Peach
33 Nees
0 Peach
3 Peach
3 Nees
0 Peach
3 Peach
1 Peach
1 Teague
1 Peach
1 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Minnewawa
5 1
Alluvial
0 Alluvial
1 44
Alluvial
1 1
Minnewawa
444
0 Minnewawa
2 Teague
2 Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Sylmar
0 Sylmar
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Peach
Shepherd
1 1
Perrin
0 Perrin
0 Minnewawa
1 Minnewawa
1 Behym
er
0 Behym
er
0 Minnewawa
1 Minnewawa
1 Clovis
0Clovis
2 1
Clovis
2 Clovis
2 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Clovis
2 0
Clovis
2 Ashlan
0Clovis
2 Ashlan
0 Clovis
2 Clovis
2 0
0 Ashlan 0
Clovis
2 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0Sierra Vist
0 0
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 Ashlan
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Fowler
0Fowler
0 Dakota
0 Fowler
0 Ashlan
00 Ashlan
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 0Fowler
0 Gettysburg
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0
00 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
00 Gettysburg
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Dakota
0 Dakota
0 Armstrong
0 Ashlan
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Armstrong
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 00
Ashlan
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
0 0 0
0 Santa Ana
0 Shaw
1 1
1 Shaw
1 Shaw1
Shaw 1Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Clovis
2 2
0 Clovis
2 Clovis
2 0
2 Santa Ana
0 Clovis
2 0
Santa Ana
0 0
Clovis
2 2
Shaw 0Clovis
1 Shaw 0
Clovis
1 Shaw 0
Barstow
1 Barstow
1 Barstow
1 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Pollasky
0 Barstow
1 Woodworth
0 Barstow
1 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 0
Clovis
2 Clovis
1 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 0
Santa Ana
0 0
Santa Ana
0 0
Sierra Vist
0 0 Shaw 0
Cole
0 Sierra Vist
0 0
Sierra Vist 0
0 0
Shaw 0
Shaw0
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 0
Shaw
0Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Barstow
0 Sunnyside
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Sunnyside
000
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard 0
Bullard 0Bullard 0Bulard/5th
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
0 0
Fifth 0
0 Woodworth
0 Woodworth
1 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Sierra
1 Woodworth
1 Woodworth
1Sierra
1 Sierra
1 1
Clovis
1 Fifth
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Fifth 0
Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Third
0 Fifth 0
Third
0 Third
0 Third
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Clovis
0 Sierra
1 1
Sierra
1 Sierra
1 0 Herndon
7 Clovis
1 Herndon
5 1
0 5
4 1 Herndon
4 Herndon
8 Clovis
0 0
Clovis
0 Clovis
00Clovis
0 Herndon
4 Fifth
0 Third
0 Third
0 Fifth 0
Third
0 Third
0 Third
0 1
Sierra
1 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Bullard
0 Sunnyside
0 0
Bullard
0 Sunnyside
000
Sunnyside
0 Tollhouse
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 0
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Tollhouse 0
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Tollhous
e 0
Tollhouse
0 0
Herndon
3 Herndon
7 Sunnyside0
Sunnyside
0 0
Sunnyside
011
Sunnyside
1 Sunnyside
11 Herndon
3 Fowler
0 Fowler
00 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0 Fowler
0 Shaw0
0 Shaw 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0Fowler
0 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 Barstow
00 0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Barstow
0 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
000
Armstrong
00 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
00 Shaw 0
Armstrong
00Armstrong
0 Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Shaw 0
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Barstow
0Armstrong
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 0
Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 0 Bullard
0 Fowler
1Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Fowler
11 Tollhouse
0 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Fowler
1 Sierra
0 Fowler
1 Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Fowler
0 Herndon
2 0
Herndon
6 Fowler/168
0 Herndon
2 Tollhouse
0 Tollhouse
0 Tollhouse
0 00
Bullard
0 Armstrong
000
Bullard
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0Armstrong
1 Sierra
1 Armstrong
1 Armstrong
1 Sierra
1 0
Bullard
0 Bullard
0 0
0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 0
Sierra
0 Armstrong
11 Tollhouse
0 Armstrong
1 Armstrong
1 1
0 Herndon
1 1
Herndon
5 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 0
0Herndon
1 Tollhouse
1 Temperance
0 0
Dakota
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Temperance
0 0
Ashlan
0 0
0 Temperance
0 Gettysburg
0 0
0 0
Gettysburg
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 0
Gettysburg
0 Locan
0 Gettysburg
0 Locan
0 Ashlan
0 1
De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 Ashlan
0 0
Ashlan
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 0
0 Shaw1
Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Locan
0 Shaw1
Locan
0 Shaw 1
Shaw1
De Wolf
0 De Wolf
1 Shaw 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 0
Locan
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 De Wolf
0 Barstow
0 De Wolf
0 Barstow
0 0
1 Bullard
0 Temperance
2 Temperance
2 0 Bullard
0 Sierra
0 Sierra
0 Temperance
2 Bullard
0 Temperance
2 Temperance
2 Herndon
4 0
Herndon
2 Herndon
2 2
Herndon
1 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 Bullard
1 0
De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Bullard
0 Bullard
0 De Wolf
0 0
De Wolf
0 Locan
0 Herndon
1 Locan
0 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 Herndon
1 De Wolf
0 Herndon
1 Leonard
0 Shaw0
Sha
Barstow
0 Leonard
0Leonard
0 Bullard
0 Leonard
0 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 He
Leonard
0 Leonard0
Alluvial
1 Alluvial
1Clovis
0 0
Nees
0 00
Clovis
0 Clovis0
1 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
1 Nees
0 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Alluvial
0 0
Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Alluvial
0 Sunnyside
0Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Alluvial
0 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0 Teague
0 0
Sunnyside
0 Clovis
0 Perrin
0 Shepherd
1 Sunnyside
0 Sunnyside
0Sunnyside
0 Shepherd
1 Shepherd
0 Sunnyside
0 Perrin0
Alluvial
0 Fowler
0 Alluvial
0 0
Fowler
00 Fowler
0 Nees
0 Nees
0 Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Teague
0 Teague
0 Fowler
0 0
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 000
Armstrong
0 Armstrong
00 Armstrong
0 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Nees
0 Temperance
0 0
Teague
0 Fowler
0 0
Fowler
0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler
0 Behym
er
0 Tollhouse 0Nees
0 Tollhouse
0 Locan
0 Alluvial
0 Tollhouse
0 Locan
0 Nees
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial 0
Alluvial
0 De Wolf
0 Tollhouse 0
De Wolf
0 Tollhouse
0 Nees
0 Tollhouse
0 Shepherd
0 0
Locan
0 Locan
0 Shepherd
0 0
Windmill
0 0
Alluvial
0Nees
0 Alluvial
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 Alluvial
0 Nees
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 0
Temperance
0 Fowler
0 0
Temp/168
2 Temperance
1 1
SR 168 4
Bullard/168
4 Bullard/168
1 Bullard
0 2
Bullard
2 Bullard
8 Villa
18 Bullard
8 Bullard
7 0
Bullard
0 Bullard/168 0
Temperance
0 Temperance
0 Nees
0 0
Fowler
0 Fowler/168
0 0 Nees
0 SR 168 1
Alluvial
2 SR 168
3 Nees0
Tollhouse 0
Tollhouse
0 Owens Mt Pkwy
0 Owens/168
0 Alluvial
2 Teague
0 0
Teague
1 1
Herndon/168 0
0 2
Nees
0 Tem
p/
16 8
0 Willow
1 Locan
0 Nees
0 Perrin
0 Willow
3 Willow
2 Perrin
0 Fowler
1 0
0 Teague
0 0
Willow
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 Chestnut
2 Temperance
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Willow
3 Leonard
0 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 1
0 Willow
3 Locan
0 Locan
0 Leonard
0 Temperance
1 Nees
0 0
Nees
0 Willow
3 Pryor
0 Minnewawa
4 Minnewawa
1 Peach
1 Shepherd
0 0
Behym
er
0 0
Plym
outh
0 0
Shepherd
0 Villa
0 Herndon
2 SR 168
3 0
Clovis 0
Clovis
0 Shaw 0
0 Shepherd
0 0
Chestnut
0 Behym
er
0 Ashlan
0 0
0 Gettysburg
0 Clovis
1 Clovis
1 Locan
0 Locan
0 Locan
0 Teague
0 Willow
1 Shepherd
0 2
Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Teague
0 1
0 0
Temperance
1 0 Alluvial 0
1 0Nees
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 2
Teague
2 Teague
0 Teague 2
0 0
Clovis
0 0
Willow
1 Gettysburg
0 Gettysburg
0 SR 168 1
SR 168
6 SR 41
0 SR 41
0 0
Armstrong
0 Alluvial
0 Willow
3 Alluvial
0 0
Friant
0 0
0 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
2 De Wolf
0 De Wolf
0 1
Peach
9 0
Fowler
0 De Wolf
1 1
Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Locan
0 De Wolf
1 De Wolf
1 Shepherd
1 Minnewawa
2 2
2 Villa
4 0
Locan
0 Shepherd
10 Clovis
0 Teague
1 Peach
26 SR 168
0 SR 168 0
Shaw/168
0 Shaw/168 0
Bullard/168
7 Herndon/168
1 1
0 0
Shaw1
Shaw1
0 Clovis
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Alluvial
2 Alluvial
2 Bullard
3 SR 41
0 Cedar
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 First
0 Nees
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Peach
0 Bullard
1 Bullard
3 Peach26
Shaw/410
Herndon
20 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 Herndon
1 Nees
0 Nees
0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Willow
33 Willow
3 Willow
1 6
0 Chest_Will
1 Chest-Will
1 Clovis
0 Fowler
0 0 0
Shepherd
0 0
Alluvial
0 Temperance
0 Leonard
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
00 Shepherd
0 Peach
0 Sylmar
0 0
Minnewawa
1 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 0
Shepherd
0 Windmill
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Shephe
0 0
SR 168
0 Willow
1 9
Shaw/168
0 SR 168
2 5
1 0
0 1
1 0
Chestnut
1 1
0 1
1 Campus
0 Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 Owens/168
0 Tollhouse
0 De Wolf
0 Leonard
0 Leonard
0 Barstow
0 Barstow
0 Locan
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 Willow
1 0
Temperance
0 Bullard/410
Ashlan/410
0 0
Sierra
0 0
0 1
Chestnut
1 Chestnut
1 Dakota
0 Campus
0 0 00 0
Fresno
0 Ashlan
0 Ashlan
0 0
Alluvial
2 Leonard
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
Ashlan
0 Ashlan
2 SR 168 1
Alluvial
4 Cam
pus
0 Campus
0 Campus
0 0
Alluvial
4 4
0 Millbrook
0 Willow
1 0
Shepherd
0 Shepherd
0 Peach
0 Peach
0 Ashlan
1 Alluvial
0 Alluvial
0 Alluvial 0
De Wolf
2 Alluvial
2 Owens Mt Pkwy
0 Clovis
0 Clovis
0 Behym
er
0 Peach
0 Plym
outh
0 Plym
outh
0 Peach
0 Perrin
0 Clovis
0Clovis
0 Pryor
0 Pryor0
Clovis
0 Marion 0
Behym
er
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 Villa
0 Plym
outh
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Sylmar
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Pryor
0 Villa
0 Marion
0 Plymouth
0 Plymouth
0 W
indm
ill
0 Windmill
0 Windmill
0 606
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
Baseline and Future Model Output
607
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2019 Fresno County Travel Demand Model
104
37 110
93 376 998
80 31
153
37 118
100
132
180
126
419
411
227
8 35 9
332
96 196
307
97 74
117
92 82 6183
11 8
41 24
40 40
70175
164
110
42 78
98 57
36 42
48 34
72 52
59 72
00 00 1010
1619
67 50
74 86
62 8381 56 0 00 0
7 15
11 8
21 11
31 00 0
181
72 127
201
1 10 0
50 105
95 84
111
89 121
123
140 70
288
288
331
280
79 41
82 73
5295 10
349
77 0
39 9
Chestn
ut
32 9
57 5
91 9
33932088SR 16
8 1428
3450
SR 168
37 72
58 41
Sierra
Sierra
69 72
58 41
Sierra
Sierra
69 72
58 41
Sierra
Sierra
1543
2141
Herndon
985
678Chest
nut
329575
329
575
Ch
estn
ut
20 1
77 2
75 0
64 9
Ch
estn
ut
Ch
estn
ut
20 1
77 2
75 0
64 9
Ch
estn
ut
Chestn
ut
69 72
58 41
Sierra
Sierra
20 1
77 2
75 0
64 9
209
728
719
621
Chestnut
Chestnut
49 105
42 22
Sierra
Sierra
728
209
621
719
49 105
42 22
49 105
42 22
Sierra
Sierra
1296
1694
Willow
63 105
49 22
Sierra
Sierra
63 49
22 63
105
49 22
Sierra
Sierra2062
1354
Willow
1297
1673
100
231
193
148
Sierra
Sierra
19 73
13 49
129
7 167
3 Will
ow
72 8
20 9
62 1
71 9 209
728
719
621
Chestnut
Chestnut
276
629
666
653
Ches
tnu
t
Ches
tnu
t
629276653 666
629
276
653
666
27 6
62 9
66 6
65 3
27 6
62 9
66 6
653
Ches
tnut
Ches
tnut
1905
1594
Herndon
1917
2298
Herndon
583812
Chestnut
583812
Che
stnut985
678
583
812
Che
stnut
985678
Ches
tnu
t
129
7 167
3 Will
ow
1973
1349
Wil
low
1973
1349
Willow
198
2 142
6 Will
ow
2231
1873
Herndon
1329
1883
Herndon
1068
1828
Willow
10 01
18 11
W
illow
100
231
193
148
100
231
193
148
Sierra
Sierra
100
231
193
148
100
231
193
148
Sierra
Sierra
69 74
85 119
Sierra
Sierra
69 74
85 69
74 85
119
69 74
85 119
Sierra
Sierra
30 5051 39
Peach
Peach
3518 9972
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
79 82
135
208
Sierra
Sierra
18 3572 99Pe
ach
Pe
ach
18 3572 99Pea
ch
Pea
ch
3518 9972
Peach
Peach
10 0
60 15
5 14
1 1274
1847
Herndon60
100141
155
Peach
Peach
1792
1772
Herndon
295
264
318
413
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir29
5 26
4 31
8 41
3 Pea
ch
Pea
ch
295264 318413
308151237 370Pea
ch
Pea
ch
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir
1274
1847
Herndon
744782775 916Villa Villa
782
744
916
775
Villa
Villa
735814748 853Villa Villa
116
160
161
196
Sierra
Sierra
79 82
135
208
Sierra
Sierra
81 4
73 5
85 3
74 8
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
73 5
81 4
74 8
85 3
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
116
160
161
196
Sierra
Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
128
171
181
213
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
73 5
81 4
74 8
85 3
Vil
la
Vil
la
698
782
717
821
Vill
a
Vill
a
735814748 853Vi
lla
Vi
lla
698782
717
821
Vill
a
Vill
a
698
782
717
821
Villa
Villa
1727
1628
Herndon
00 0
0 0
0 Fir
Fir
1030
1640
Herndon
1727
1628
Herndon
50 1
57 5
49 3
64 7
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
501
575
493647
Vill
aVill
a
501
575
493
647
Vil/Minnew
Vil/Minnew
1030
1640
Herndon
147281
Minn
ewawa
1030
1640
Herndon
1326
1164
Herndon
120
129
191
117
Alluvial
Alluvial
77 0
39 9
Ches
tnut
329
575
Chestnut
770399
338
616
Ch
estnut
122
141
195
127
Alluvial
Alluvial
76 9
43 5
Chestn
ut
125
128
191
204
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial
210
153
223
266
Alluvial
Alluvial
210
153
223
266
Alluvial
Alluvial
151
308
370
237
Peach
Peach
15 1
30 8
37 0
23 7
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
52 129
152
86 Peach
Peach
21 45
66 43
Alluvial
Alluvial
21 97
66 208
Alluvial
Alluvial
21 45
66 43
Alluvial
Alluvial
536276
M
innewa
wa
0 0
0 0
147281
Min
new
awa
536
276
Minnewawa
21 97
66 208
Alluvial
Alluvial
153
270
308
311
Alluvial
Alluvial
14 0
20 7
48 8
34 1
M
innew
awa
153
270
308
311
Alluvial
Alluvial
153
270
308
311
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
128
171
181
213
Sierra
Sierra
00 00
1030
1640
Herndon
1326
1164
Herndon
Alluvial
Alluvial
31 5718
56 SR
168
1326
1164
Herndon
1982
1426
1363
1707
Willow
280
195
343
271
Alluvial
Alluvial
10 01
18 11
W
illow
155
6 118
4 Will
ow
13 63
17 07
W
illow
122
141
195
127
Alluvial
Alluvial
29 5
26 4
31 8
41 3
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
129
176
240
198
Alluvial
Alluvial
60 100
141
155
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
236232
Hernd
on/168
0 060
100141
155
1792
1772
Herndon
1774
1821
Herndon
1329
1883
Herndon
1030
1640
Herndon
1030
1640
Herndon
1556
1184
Willow
1001
1811
Wil
low
10 68
18 28
W
illow
50 157
5 49
3 64
7 140
207
Minn
ewa
wa
1428
3450
SR 16
8 15
56 11
84 W
illow
1982
1426
W
illo
w
155
6 118
4 Will
ow
10 68
18 28
W
illow
106
8 182
8 Will
ow
155
6 118
4 Will
ow
608
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2035 Fresno County Travel Demand Model
108
68 129
78 6158 123119
138
35 175
50 205
113
186
201
100
385
375
205
7 25 6
295
90 174
302
67 79
107
78 19
8 7696
12 3
47 31
49 50
99228
205
151
68 84
119
76 37
53 53
40 73
53 63
92 00 00 2122
2131
135
68 110
125
52 5589 58 0 00 0
3 14
10 7
23 33
95 00 0
177
70 142
208
15 21 2
83 94
135
99 117
155
190
145
133 111
305
388
395
328
59 49
166
91 10
7 24
0 25
787
68 4
44 6
Chestn
ut
25 1
69 8
12 36
53322782SR 16
8 1959
4536
SR 168
0 0
0 0
Old Town
Old Town
30 267
172
72 Sierra
Sierra
125
267
172
72 Sierra
Sierra
125
267
172
72 Sierra
Sierra
2139
2559
Herndon
Herndon Frontage Rd
Herndon Frontage Rd
908
824Chest
nut
251698
251
698
Ch
estn
ut
24 7
15 00
99 3
83 5
Ch
estn
ut
Ch
estn
ut
24 7
15 00
99 3
83 5
Ch
estn
ut
Chestn
ut
125
267
172
72 Sierra
Sierra
24 7
15 00
99 3
83 5
252
1307
918
830
Chestnut
Chestnut
27 367
211
42 Sierra
Sierra
252
830
918
27 367
211
42 27
367
211
42 Sierra
Sierra
1405
2105
Willow
38 356
220
42 Sierra
Sierra
38 42
38 356
220
42 Sierra
Sierra1999
1691
Willow
1363
2110
112
457
349
221
Sierra
Sierra
19 29
16 46
136
3 211
0 Will
ow
13 07
25 2
83 0
91 8 252
1307
918
830
Chestnut
Chestnut
325
1262
851
865
Ches
tnu
t
Ches
tnu
t
126
2 325865 851
325
865
851
32 5
85 1
86 5
32 5
1262 85
1 865
Ches
tnut
Ches
tnut
1767
1342
Herndon
2059
2772
Herndon
5681084
Chestnut
568
1084
Che
stnut908
824
568
1084
Che
stnut
908824
Ches
tnu
t
136
3 211
0 Will
ow
1929
1646
Wil
low
1929
1646
Willow
199
5 170
8 Will
ow
2284
1829
Herndon
2052
2452
Herndon
1274
2411
Willow
12 35
23 61
W
illow
112
457
349
221
112
457
349
221
Sierra
Sierra
112
457
349
221
112
457
349
221
Sierra
Sierra
119
332
222
179
Sierra
Sierra
119
332
222
179
119
332
222
179
Sierra
Sierra
38 5152 50
Peach
Peach
6827
9 29
6 24
2 Pe
ach
Pe
ach
376
364
442
455
Sierra
Sierra
27 9
6824
2 29
6 Pe
ach
Pe
ach
27 9
6824
2 29
6 Pea
ch
Pea
ch
68 279
296
242
Peach
Peach
14 1
32 0
35 9
32 0
2055
2348
Herndon320141320
359
Peach
Peach
1977
1848
Herndon
262
501
365
402
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir26
2 50
1 36
5 40
2 Pea
ch
Pea
ch
262501 365402
523181255 471Pea
ch
Pea
ch
0 0
0 0
Fir
Fir
2055
2348
Herndon
933870885 106
2 Villa Villa
870
933
1062
885
Villa
Villa
792816789 877Villa Villa
264
340
365
288
Sierra
Sierra
376
364
442
455
Sierra
Sierra
81 6
79 2
87 7
78 9
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
79 2
81 6
78 9
87 7
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
264
340
365
288
Sierra
Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
282
358
394
308
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
79 2
81 6
78 9
87 7
Vil
la
Vil
la
789
766
767
841
Vill
a
Vill
a
792816789 877Vi
lla
Vi
lla
789766
767
841
Vill
a
Vill
a
789
766
767
841
Villa
Villa
1920
1668
Herndon
00 0
0 0
0 Fir
Fir
2136
2015
Herndon
1920
1668
Herndon
42 0
98 9
82 5
64 7
Vi
lla
Vi
lla
420
989
825647
Vill
aVill
a
420
989
825
647
Vil/Minnew
Vil/Minnew
2136
2015
Herndon
115672
Minn
ewawa
2136
2015
Herndon
1453
1437
Herndon
231
306
453
254
Alluvial
Alluvial
68 4
44 6
Ches
tnut
251
698
Chestnut
684446
266
711
Ch
estnut
226
325
413
200
Alluvial
Alluvial
67 5
47 3
Chestn
ut
260
296
368
297
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial
262
263
337
340
Alluvial
Alluvial
262
263
337
340
Alluvial
Alluvial
181
523
471
255
Peach
Peach
18 1
52 3
47 1
25 5
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
62 330
237
92 Peach
Peach
30 106
110
42 Alluvial
Alluvial
30 156
110
201
Alluvial
Alluvial
30 106
110
42 Alluvial
Alluvial
957353
M
innewa
wa
0 0
0 0
115672
Min
new
awa
957
353
Minnewawa
30 156
110
201
Alluvial
Alluvial
183
315
387
418
Alluvial
Alluvial
11 5
67 6
95 2
41 8
M
innew
awa
183
315
387
418
Alluvial
Alluvial
183
315
387
418
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
282
358
394
308
Sierra
Sierra
00 00
2136
2015
Herndon
1453
1437
Herndon
Alluvial
Alluvial
0 0
0 0
Dry Cre
ek
Dry Cre
ek
42 8724
70 SR
168
1453
1437
Herndon
1995
1708
1407
2174
Willow
361
236
416
389
Alluvial
Alluvial
12 35
23 61
W
illow
225
5 159
2 Will
ow
14 07
21 74
W
illow
226
325
413
200
Alluvial
Alluvial
26 2
50 1
36 5
40 2
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
277
447
500
260
Alluvial
Alluvial
320
141
320
359
Pe
ach
Pe
ach
1046
312
Hernd
on/168
0 0320
141320
359
1977
1848
Herndon
1885
1863
Herndon
2052
2452
Herndon
2136
2015
Herndon
2136
2015
Herndon
2255
1592
Willow
1235
2361
Wil
low
12 74
24 11
W
illow
42 098
9 82
5 64
7 115
676
Minn
ewa
wa
1959
4536
SR 16
8 22
55 15
92 W
illow
1995
1708
W
illo
w
225
5 159
2 Will
ow
12 74
24 11
W
illow
127
4 241
1 Will
ow
225
5 159
2 Will
ow
0 0
0 0
Old To
wn
Old To
wn
0 0
0 0
Old Town
Old Town
00Old To
wn
0 0
0 0
609
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS
610
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 27 0 0 0 0 67 3 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 3 49 0 0 2 0 96 3 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 6 60 0 0 1 0 102 6 0 0 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 10 69 0 0 2 0 133 11 0 1 10 0 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 21 127 0 0 7 0 136 8 0 4 3 0 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 10 102 0 0 0 0 128 12 0 0 10 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 7 56 0 0 2 0 129 19 0 2 4 0 31 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 8 50 0 0 0 0 63 9 0 3 12 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 65 540 0 0 14 0 854 71 0 10 43 0 180 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 14 69 0 0 1 0 71 22 0 1 12 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 9 87 0 0 1 0 58 20 0 2 18 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 21 83 0 0 0 0 59 20 0 2 13 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 11 90 0 0 0 0 80 29 0 0 19 0 72 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 14 96 0 0 0 0 90 20 0 0 23 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 9 125 0 0 0 0 79 20 0 2 20 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 17 80 0 0 0 0 90 14 0 1 19 0 79 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 18 80 0 0 0 0 73 20 0 2 20 0 78 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 113 710 0 0 2 0 600 165 0 10 144 0 557 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 48 354 0 0 11 0 526 50 0 7 27 0 107 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 51 391 0 0 0 0 339 83 0 3 81 0 287 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.877 1.9% PM 0 83 339 0 0.959
PM 0.948 0.5%
PM AM
AM 0 50 526 0 0.973
AM PM
0.939 0.817 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 0 0
81 27 0 0
0 0 0 0
287 107 0 0
0 0 (RTOR) PHF ##### #####
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.679 48 354 0 0
PM 0.825 51 391 0 0
W Spruce Ave
N Peach Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Spruce Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
36.8401
-119.7202
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
N Peach Ave
611
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 2 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 4 0 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 1 1 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Peach Ave
W Spruce Ave 0
N Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Spruce Ave 36.8401
Fresno -119.7202
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
612
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
/ W Spruce Ave
Clear
One-Way Stop
COMMENTS
N/A
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Spruce Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
613
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 23 12 0 0 14 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 49 12 0 2 15 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 57 10 0 1 11 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 71 20 0 2 24 134 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 12 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 126 16 0 7 29 128 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 21 0 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 95 19 0 0 19 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 14 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 50 16 0 0 25 135 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 38 21 0 0 18 62 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 19 0 0 TOTAL 0 509 126 0 12 155 886 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 97 0 2 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 53 9 0 1 12 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 29 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 74 7 0 0 10 104 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 20 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 79 11 0 0 8 110 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 24 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 74 7 0 0 16 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 30 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 1 75 5 0 0 14 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 32 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 102 10 0 1 16 138 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 31 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 75 9 0 0 12 158 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 21 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 76 4 0 0 15 136 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 19 0 0 TOTAL 1 608 62 0 2 103 1059 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 206 0 0 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0 342 71 0 9 97 540 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 59 0 2 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 1 326 31 0 1 58 573 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 114 0 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.873 1.9% PM 0 0 573 58 0.928
PM 0.935 0.3%
PM AM
AM 0 0 540 97 0.983
AM PM
##### ##### PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 0 0
0 0 59 114
0 0 0 0
0 0 19 56
0 0 (RTOR) PHF 0.813 0.833
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.727 0 342 71 0
PM 0.799 1 326 31 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
W Fir Ave
N Peach Ave
36.8390
-119.7202
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Fir Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
614
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 2 0 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 1 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Fir Ave 36.8390
Fresno -119.7202
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Peach Ave
W Fir Ave
N Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
615
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Fir Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
W Fir Ave
Clear
One-Way Stop
COMMENTS
616
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 51 86 5 1 4 17 148 32 5 4 18 122 38 4 3 5 256 23 8 4 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 98 102 10 4 8 21 155 34 2 2 40 215 50 1 4 7 352 24 4 2 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 107 182 13 3 5 34 264 65 0 2 32 240 85 0 7 11 355 21 2 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 126 231 17 6 8 27 236 50 1 4 46 254 80 2 1 12 464 32 4 5 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 118 215 20 5 6 33 177 35 8 0 63 226 91 4 4 26 353 35 8 5 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 86 212 15 2 4 41 198 44 9 4 60 218 64 0 4 15 416 37 4 4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 71 148 15 5 0 42 185 54 9 3 38 160 47 3 6 29 337 49 6 5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 81 150 14 4 3 32 186 53 8 5 37 213 60 5 4 35 315 49 7 2 TOTAL 738 1326 109 30 38 247 1549 367 42 24 334 1648 515 19 33 140 2848 270 43 28 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 72 233 31 5 1 43 202 54 6 3 80 329 107 1 3 47 254 44 2 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 90 293 17 4 4 38 182 48 3 5 102 345 105 3 6 39 265 40 3 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 81 266 29 9 0 39 159 46 4 1 82 375 99 0 6 55 279 60 4 2 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 75 236 23 7 0 48 149 42 3 1 109 429 101 0 4 34 227 57 3 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 78 239 33 4 0 41 204 48 7 0 107 343 121 7 1 38 252 48 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 74 260 19 6 1 43 173 48 3 0 101 442 144 2 1 47 329 58 1 4 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 73 330 40 9 0 38 185 45 3 0 100 321 98 3 2 39 239 55 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 64 257 20 7 1 30 191 40 3 0 87 270 81 2 0 27 257 58 1 0 TOTAL 607 2114 212 51 7 320 1445 371 32 10 768 2854 856 18 23 326 2102 420 14 9 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 437 840 65 16 23 135 875 194 18 10 201 938 320 6 16 64 1588 125 18 15 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 308 1001 104 26 1 171 685 184 17 2 399 1589 465 9 12 174 1087 223 8 7 PHF Trucks
AM 0.918 1.1% PM 17 184 685 171 0.887
PM 0.919 0.3%
PM AM
AM 18 194 875 135 0.829
AM PM
0.893 0.96 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 18 8
399 201 125 223
1589 938 1588 1087
465 320 64 174
9 6 (RTOR) PHF 0.875 0.855
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.897 437 840 65 16
PM 0.939 308 1001 104 26
E Herndon Ave
N Willow Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
36.8376
-119.7296
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
E Herndon Ave
N Willow Ave
617
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
TOTAL 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 15
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 7
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 7 PM 0 0 0 6
PM Peak Total 0 25 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
7 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
4 9
Peds <>
3 0 0 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Willow Ave
E Herndon Ave E Herndon Ave
N Willow Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / E Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7296
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
618
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
E Herndon Ave / E Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns
120 Seconds Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Willow Ave / N Willow Ave
619
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 3 142 0 0 6 0 285 12 0 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 0 1 228 0 0 0 0 391 13 0 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 276 0 0 3 0 449 23 0 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 5 290 0 0 5 0 498 24 0 7 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 4 254 0 0 1 0 407 29 4 5 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10 0 3 267 0 0 3 0 433 30 0 3 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 0 8 232 0 0 5 0 400 31 0 7 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 4 259 0 0 1 0 368 41 2 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 56 0 29 1948 0 0 24 0 3231 203 6 32 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 18 0 9 399 0 0 1 0 311 64 10 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 19 0 19 421 0 0 5 0 313 67 0 3 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 25 1 6 409 0 0 3 0 348 58 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 23 0 21 499 0 0 2 0 304 66 2 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 16 0 8 457 0 0 1 0 340 62 5 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 32 0 10 495 0 0 0 0 358 71 0 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 14 0 15 426 0 0 1 0 288 53 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 21 0 14 367 0 0 1 0 303 43 1 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 168 1 102 3473 0 0 14 0 2565 484 18 7 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 26 0 13 1087 0 0 12 0 1787 106 4 16 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 96 1 45 1860 0 0 6 0 1350 257 7 3 PHF Trucks
AM 0.919 0.9% PM 96 127 0 0 0.858
PM 0.937 0.3%
PM AM
AM 26 33 0 0 0.589
AM PM
0.916 0.932 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 4 7
45 13 106 257
1860 1087 1787 1350
0 0 0 0
0 0 (RTOR) PHF 0.907 0.936
PHF (RTOR)
AM ##### 0 0 0 0
PM ##### 0 0 0 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
E Herndon Ave
N Helm Ave
36.8376
-119.7249
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
E Herndon Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Helm Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
620
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
N Helm Ave / E Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7249
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Helm Ave
E Herndon Ave E Herndon Ave
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
621
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE132 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Helm Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Helm Ave
E Herndon Ave / E Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Eastbound left turns are protected
622
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 11 14 5 4 0 33 24 19 6 0 14 123 5 1 7 1 247 13 2 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 8 28 5 2 1 54 28 24 8 0 16 200 9 2 0 6 328 19 3 5 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 14 30 7 2 3 43 39 25 3 0 21 246 21 3 3 13 431 17 5 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 10 42 3 1 0 46 56 21 4 1 26 254 16 4 3 3 474 29 2 10 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 12 83 6 0 4 49 53 30 4 6 25 218 8 3 2 6 391 41 6 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 22 63 6 3 0 62 58 30 4 0 28 252 18 3 3 3 439 29 6 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 9 18 2 0 0 59 51 29 9 3 25 204 6 1 6 1 358 38 6 6 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 10 14 9 3 0 34 19 18 4 4 19 229 5 0 1 6 399 21 1 4 TOTAL 96 292 43 15 8 380 328 196 42 14 174 1726 88 17 25 39 3067 207 31 35 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 6 15 5 2 0 77 32 28 10 0 14 377 25 4 2 3 275 25 2 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 4 18 10 3 0 68 30 19 2 1 24 389 25 6 4 5 375 46 5 3 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 11 23 3 1 0 67 29 26 2 2 25 370 16 0 3 7 319 34 3 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 13 24 4 0 3 84 38 22 5 0 16 445 34 5 2 3 305 38 4 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 10 24 6 1 0 75 59 34 1 0 17 374 27 3 1 11 380 52 5 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 30 6 2 0 78 43 22 3 1 29 441 34 6 0 12 419 59 3 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 9 26 7 4 0 77 53 34 3 1 26 381 22 5 1 16 319 41 3 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 8 19 3 1 0 78 53 23 4 2 16 341 31 6 0 5 293 44 6 0 TOTAL 76 179 44 14 3 604 337 208 30 7 167 3118 214 35 13 62 2685 339 31 11 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 58 218 22 6 7 200 206 106 15 7 100 970 63 13 11 25 1735 116 19 17 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 47 104 23 7 3 314 193 112 12 2 88 1641 117 19 4 42 1423 190 15 5 PHF Trucks
AM 0.945 1.1% PM 12 112 193 314 0.921
PM 0.904 0.3%
PM AM
AM 15 106 206 200 0.853
AM PM
0.916 0.951 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 19 15
88 100 116 190
1641 970 1735 1423
117 63 25 42
19 13 (RTOR) PHF 0.927 0.844
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.738 58 218 22 6
PM 0.853 47 104 23 7
E Herndon Ave
N Peach Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
36.8376
-119.7202
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
E Herndon Ave
N Peach Ave
623
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 1 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 1
Peds <>
0 0 1 0 AM
0 0 1 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Peach Ave
E Herndon Ave E Herndon Ave
N Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / E Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7202
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
624
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
E Herndon Ave / E Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns
181 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
625
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 12 34 15 10 1 39 19 12 3 1 9 130 15 7 2 10 249 34 2 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 23 45 12 4 3 71 27 12 1 6 17 261 19 3 0 15 341 49 2 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 26 78 32 2 1 59 56 24 9 4 24 263 24 4 4 19 430 52 1 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 51 77 22 7 4 49 67 19 9 3 23 267 33 10 4 23 435 76 13 8 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 45 117 27 7 5 65 60 12 3 1 34 225 38 4 3 24 378 76 3 5 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 43 71 22 2 4 62 74 18 2 1 13 251 39 2 3 21 427 70 2 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 37 43 18 4 4 53 59 26 5 3 13 240 25 2 6 14 333 41 0 6 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 32 36 16 3 3 42 60 15 2 3 23 219 24 3 4 14 393 50 7 3 TOTAL 269 501 164 39 25 440 422 138 34 22 156 1856 217 35 26 140 2986 448 30 34 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 38 53 21 8 2 53 52 29 4 1 18 406 44 13 2 37 307 48 11 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 34 60 34 3 0 57 65 12 3 0 8 382 35 5 4 29 382 45 4 4 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 54 64 18 0 2 64 75 27 4 3 16 363 43 14 5 31 301 38 8 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 25 57 32 0 0 66 64 16 1 1 16 448 39 10 2 27 373 65 6 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 35 59 21 1 0 87 86 30 5 0 20 456 42 17 1 35 360 41 4 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 45 76 27 3 1 58 58 12 3 0 31 463 38 8 1 28 406 42 5 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 27 71 28 2 1 68 66 17 5 0 21 445 28 10 0 22 310 46 5 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 40 44 27 1 0 54 54 11 5 1 23 366 30 3 1 36 317 30 6 0 TOTAL 298 484 208 18 6 507 520 154 30 6 153 3329 299 80 16 245 2756 355 49 10 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 165 343 103 18 14 235 257 73 23 9 94 1006 134 20 14 87 1670 274 19 18 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 132 263 108 6 2 279 274 75 14 1 88 1812 147 45 4 112 1449 194 20 4 PHF Trucks
AM 0.972 1.2% PM 14 75 274 279 0.773
PM 0.960 0.2%
PM AM
AM 23 73 257 235 0.917
AM PM
0.962 0.955 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 19 20
88 94 274 194
1812 1006 1670 1449
147 134 87 112
45 20 (RTOR) PHF 0.951 0.922
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.808 165 343 103 18
PM 0.85 132 263 108 6
E Herndon Ave
N Villa Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Villa Ave/ E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
36.8376
-119.7137
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
E Herndon Ave
N Villa Ave
626
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 3 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 1
Peds <>
0 1
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Villa Ave
E Herndon Ave E Herndon Ave
N Villa Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
N Villa Ave/ E Herndon Ave 36.8376
Fresno -119.7137
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
627
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
E Herndon Ave / E Herndon Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns
151 Seconds Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Villa Ave/ E Herndon Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Villa Ave / N Villa Ave
628
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 2 150 7 1 6 9 160 0 0 2 3 0 9 7 0 6 0 6 5 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 2 201 7 0 6 10 209 3 0 3 1 0 4 3 0 1 1 11 7 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 1 288 14 1 4 15 319 14 0 2 3 1 2 2 0 1 1 5 3 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 366 35 3 5 20 259 13 0 1 8 2 4 3 0 2 1 16 10 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 5 321 6 2 7 24 236 29 0 0 17 1 7 4 0 2 1 7 5 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 5 300 4 0 3 20 224 16 0 2 7 3 8 3 0 3 1 9 6 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4 225 4 0 0 9 204 17 0 2 9 4 8 5 1 1 2 4 1 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 4 240 9 0 2 14 231 21 1 4 18 1 11 5 0 4 3 9 4 1 TOTAL 28 2091 86 7 33 121 1842 113 1 16 66 12 53 32 1 20 10 67 41 6 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 12 256 4 1 1 31 286 9 2 0 26 3 25 9 0 5 2 7 2 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 18 322 8 0 3 25 243 6 0 0 33 2 17 8 0 7 0 11 5 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 20 290 9 0 0 17 278 6 0 2 51 3 15 4 1 1 4 6 3 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 17 302 7 0 2 32 242 10 1 0 29 4 22 6 0 6 1 7 4 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 14 340 10 1 1 22 293 9 1 0 42 2 32 14 0 3 1 9 3 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 12 333 3 1 0 29 309 9 0 1 32 1 21 8 1 7 4 15 4 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 15 311 5 0 0 29 275 3 0 0 26 5 23 14 1 5 1 11 4 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 19 275 12 1 0 23 256 6 0 1 35 2 17 8 0 4 3 12 4 1 TOTAL 127 2429 58 4 7 208 2182 58 4 4 274 22 172 71 3 38 16 78 29 5 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 16 1275 59 6 19 79 1038 72 0 5 35 7 21 12 0 8 4 37 24 4 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 58 1286 25 2 3 112 1119 31 2 1 129 12 98 42 2 21 7 42 15 3 PHF Trucks
AM 0.907 1.1% PM 2 31 1119 112 0.909
PM 0.946 0.3%
PM AM
AM 0 72 1038 79 0.854
AM PM
0.786 0.63 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 24 15
129 35 37 42
12 7 4 7
98 21 8 21
42 12 (RTOR) PHF 0.645 0.673
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.831 16 1275 59 6
PM 0.94 58 1286 25 2
W Magill Ave
N Willow Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / W Magill Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
36.8357
-119.7295
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
W Magill Ave
N Willow Ave
629
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 2 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 8 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
3 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
2 2
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Willow Ave
W Magill Ave W Magill Ave
N Willow Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / W Magill Ave 36.8357
Fresno -119.7295
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
630
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
W Magill Ave / W Magill Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns
129 Seconds Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Willow Ave / W Magill Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Willow Ave / N Willow Ave
631
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 5 24 0 0 0 0 28 1 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5 36 0 0 1 0 30 7 0 2 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 13 42 0 0 2 0 59 22 0 1 11 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 20 42 0 0 1 0 62 13 0 2 13 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 6 80 0 0 4 0 55 13 0 2 21 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 2 72 0 0 0 0 65 15 0 1 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4 26 0 0 1 0 49 6 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 8 21 0 0 0 0 23 7 0 3 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 63 343 0 0 9 0 371 84 0 11 87 0 31 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 2 21 0 0 0 0 49 8 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 7 18 0 0 1 0 56 10 0 2 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 6 29 0 0 0 0 39 12 0 1 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 5 26 0 0 0 0 71 5 0 0 13 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 9 26 0 0 0 0 73 18 0 0 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 10 43 0 0 0 0 75 15 0 1 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 5 27 0 0 0 0 67 20 0 1 13 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 6 26 0 0 0 0 70 22 0 2 8 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 50 216 0 0 1 0 500 110 0 7 86 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 41 236 0 0 7 0 241 63 0 6 61 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 30 122 0 0 0 0 285 75 0 4 44 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.936 2.3% PM 0 75 285 0 0.978
PM 0.922 0.7%
PM AM
AM 0 63 241 0 0.938
AM PM
0.838 0.891 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 0 0
44 61 0 0
0 0 0 0
23 21 0 0
0 0 (RTOR) PHF ##### #####
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.805 41 236 0 0
PM 0.717 30 122 0 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
N Peach Ave
36.8363
-119.7197
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
W Magill Ave
N Peach Ave
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Magill Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
632
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 1 0 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 1 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Magill Ave 36.8363
Fresno -119.7197
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Peach Ave
W Magill Ave
N Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
633
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPEN/A
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / W Magill Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
/W Magill Ave
Clear
One-Way Stop
COMMENTS
634
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 29 11 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 40 13 0 1 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 51 14 0 2 1 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 64 22 0 1 1 65 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 82 28 0 4 0 57 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 71 6 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 27 4 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 29 6 0 0 0 25 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 0 393 104 0 8 2 399 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 14 0 0
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 22 11 0 0 1 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 22 5 0 1 0 65 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 31 8 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 27 3 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 34 4 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 50 4 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 30 14 0 0 1 71 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 29 2 0 0 1 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 TOTAL 0 245 51 0 1 3 546 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 23 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 268 70 0 7 2 259 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 8 0 0 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 143 24 0 0 2 307 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 10 0 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.913 1.8% PM 0 0 307 2 0.954
PM 0.900 0.2%
PM AM
AM 0 0 259 2 0.932
AM PM
##### ##### PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 0 0
0 0 8 10
0 0 0 0
0 0 10 25
0 0 (RTOR) PHF 0.75 0.875
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.768 0 268 70 0
PM 0.773 0 143 24 0
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
N Peach Ave
N Peach Ave
36.8352
-119.7182
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
635
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 1 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave 36.8352
Fresno -119.7182
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Peach Ave
N Peach Ave
N Peach Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
636
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPENA Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Peach Ave / N Peach Ave
N Peach Ave
Clear
Oneway Stop
COMMENTS
637
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 12 33 6 4 2 15 55 3 1 1 1 32 10 5 1 7 54 9 3 2 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 10 76 10 2 2 22 95 1 0 2 2 34 12 7 0 13 69 10 3 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 14 89 9 3 3 27 110 8 0 1 7 54 18 7 5 21 113 22 8 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 14 98 6 1 2 19 116 17 3 5 6 83 19 12 2 24 120 35 21 3 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 25 190 4 1 4 25 119 24 4 0 9 75 19 7 4 12 101 54 17 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 15 143 5 0 4 29 132 18 2 1 6 55 21 7 7 4 98 24 5 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 11 60 7 2 3 40 129 16 2 6 4 61 13 6 7 12 83 17 6 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 5 46 5 1 2 17 67 2 1 4 2 55 18 9 2 9 59 6 5 1 TOTAL 106 735 52 14 22 194 823 89 13 20 37 449 130 60 28 102 697 177 68 14 Time Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 18 89 14 2 3 24 54 3 1 3 5 80 32 14 4 9 71 11 8 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 20 121 10 5 2 17 77 7 1 2 7 107 24 8 3 8 86 19 8 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 26 97 14 6 1 23 69 4 0 2 6 103 23 8 5 6 65 17 12 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 20 119 12 4 1 16 77 7 0 1 8 91 20 10 0 5 96 14 4 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 12 120 17 4 0 18 73 3 0 0 9 108 19 9 2 2 75 23 17 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 15 154 17 4 0 22 97 8 0 0 4 97 17 18 0 7 76 21 9 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 18 119 4 2 0 23 96 6 0 1 8 114 14 4 1 8 70 22 9 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 10 104 8 3 0 29 80 7 3 1 6 105 22 6 0 5 72 9 6 0 TOTAL 139 923 96 30 7 172 623 45 5 10 53 805 171 77 15 50 611 136 73 0 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks Left Thru Right (RTOR) Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 68 520 24 5 13 100 477 67 9 7 28 267 77 33 18 61 432 135 51 7 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 65 512 50 14 1 79 343 24 0 2 29 410 70 41 3 22 317 80 39 0 PHF Trucks
AM 0.858 2.0% PM 0 24 343 79 0.878
PM 0.935 0.3%
PM AM
AM 9 67 477 100 0.899
AM PM
0.936 0.861 PHF
(RTOR) PHF
(RTOR) 51 39
29 28 135 80
410 267 432 317
70 77 61 22
41 33 (RTOR) PHF 0.877 0.911
PHF (RTOR)
AM 0.699 68 520 24 5
PM 0.843 65 512 50 14
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Alluvial Ave
N Minnewawa
36.8448
-119.7112
SouthboundNorthbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Alluvial Ave
N Minnewawa
WestboundEastbound
Turning Movement Report
N Minnewawa / Alluvial Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
638
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION LATITUDE
COUNTY LONGITUDE
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 2
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 1
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 8 PM 0 0 0 4
PM Peak Total 5 7 AM 0 0 0 0
Peds <>
1 2
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 5
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 2
Peds <>
5 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
N Minnewawa / Alluvial Ave 36.8448
Fresno -119.7112
Thursday, February 08, 2024 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
N Minnewawa
Alluvial Ave Alluvial Ave
N Minnewawa Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
639
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612
LOCATION N/S STREET
COUNTY E/W STREET
COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE97 Seconds Seconds
Turning Movement Report
N Minnewawa / Alluvial Ave
Fresno
Thursday, February 08, 2024
N Minnewawa / N Minnewawa
Alluvial Ave / Alluvial Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns
640
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
APPENDIX C
INTERSECTION ANALYSES
641
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Existing-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 107 48 354 526 50
Future Vol, veh/h 27 107 48 354 526 50
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 31 122 55 402 598 57
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1139 627 655 0 - 0
Stage 1 627 -----
Stage 2 512 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 223 484 932 - - -
Stage 1 532 -----
Stage 2 602 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 210 484 932 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 344 -----
Stage 1 501 -----
Stage 2 602 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 17.2 1.1 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 932 - 447 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.059 - 0.341 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - 17.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.5 - -
642
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Existing-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 59 342 71 97 540
Future Vol, veh/h 19 59 342 71 97 540
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 22 68 393 82 111 621
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1279 436 0 0 476 0
Stage 1 435 -----
Stage 2 844 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 183 620 - - 1086 -
Stage 1 653 -----
Stage 2 422 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 164 619 - - 1085 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 286 -----
Stage 1 652 -----
Stage 2 379 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 0 1.3
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 482 1085 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.186 0.103 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.2 8.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.3 -
643
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 201 938 320 64 1588 125 437 840 65 135 875 194 Future Volume (vph) 201 938 320 64 1588 125 437 840 65 135 875 194 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3429 5085 1542 3414 5085 1542 3420 5085 1542 3420 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 301 126 90 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 1020 348 70 1726 136 475 913 71 147 951 211 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 1020 348 70 1726 136 475 913 71 147 951 211 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.6 49.3 49.3 9.9 46.6 46.6 21.6 47.0 47.0 13.8 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 10.5% 41.1% 41.1% 8.3% 38.8% 38.8% 18.0% 39.2% 39.2% 11.5% 32.7% 32.7% Maximum Green (s) 8.6 44.4 44.4 5.9 41.7 41.7 17.6 42.1 42.1 9.8 34.3 34.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 644
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.6 46.4 46.4 5.9 41.7 41.7 17.6 42.4 42.4 9.2 34.1 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.98 0.22 0.94 0.51 0.12 0.56 0.95 0.40 Control Delay 89.3 29.8 6.9 63.2 55.0 6.6 79.0 31.7 3.7 61.6 60.1 16.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 89.3 29.8 6.9 63.2 55.0 6.6 79.0 31.7 3.7 61.6 60.1 16.4
L O S FCAEEAECAEEB
Approach Delay 32.9 51.9 45.8 53.2
Approach LOS CDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 226 23 27 480 5 190 203 0 57 378 50 Queue Length 95th (ft) #160 271 95 52 #594 49 #292 246 22 91 #508 119 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 246 1969 781 168 1770 619 504 1801 604 280 1013 531 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.98 0.22 0.94 0.51 0.12 0.53 0.94 0.40 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.8
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
Intersection Signal Delay: 46.0 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
645
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 13 1087 1787 106 0 33
Future Volume (vph) 13 1087 1787 106 0 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 115 193
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 14 1182 1942 115 0 36
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 1182 1942 115 0 36
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 12.0 106.0 94.0 94.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 9.1% 80.3% 71.2% 71.2% 19.7%
Maximum Green (s) 8.0 101.1 89.1 89.1 21.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
646
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 38.0 36.5 36.5 5.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.33 0.57 0.10 0.08
Control Delay 28.9 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.9 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 3.4 5.2 0.3
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 36 74 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 46 193 14 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 540 5085 5085 1583 1269
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.23 0.38 0.07 0.03
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 54.3
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
647
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 100 970 63 25 1735 116 58 218 22 200 206 106 Future Volume (vph) 100 970 63 25 1735 116 58 218 22 200 206 106 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1550 1770 5085 1550 1770 1863 1562 1770 1863 1563 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 105 1021 66 26 1826 122 61 229 23 211 217 112 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 1021 66 26 1826 122 61 229 23 211 217 112 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 59.0 59.0 10.0 54.0 54.0 13.7 27.0 27.0 24.0 37.3 37.3 Total Split (%) 12.5% 49.2% 49.2% 8.3% 45.0% 45.0% 11.4% 22.5% 22.5% 20.0% 31.1% 31.1% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 54.1 54.1 6.0 49.1 49.1 9.7 22.1 22.1 20.0 32.4 32.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 648
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.1 55.3 55.3 6.0 46.7 46.7 8.4 18.0 18.0 17.2 29.3 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.40 0.08 0.27 0.85 0.16 0.45 0.75 0.06 0.76 0.44 0.22 Control Delay 70.2 19.2 0.2 61.7 34.0 1.8 63.1 61.2 0.3 64.8 38.8 5.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 70.2 19.2 0.2 61.7 34.0 1.8 63.1 61.2 0.3 64.8 38.8 5.6
L O S EBAECAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 22.7 32.4 57.1 42.0
Approach LOS C C E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 183 0 19 446 0 44 166 0 152 139 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #155 233 0 51 539 17 92 255 0 #259 215 35 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 179 2627 861 98 2306 792 158 380 448 327 557 555 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.39 0.08 0.27 0.79 0.15 0.39 0.60 0.05 0.65 0.39 0.20 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.1
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
649
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 94 1006 134 87 1670 274 165 343 103 235 257 73 Future Volume (vph) 94 1006 134 87 1670 274 165 343 103 235 257 73 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1768 5085 1555 3425 5085 1536 3419 1863 1555 3420 3539 1555 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 102 168 106 90
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 97 1037 138 90 1722 282 170 354 106 242 265 75 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 1037 138 90 1722 282 170 354 106 242 265 75 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 56.0 56.0 11.0 52.0 52.0 15.0 37.0 37.0 16.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 12.5% 46.7% 46.7% 9.2% 43.3% 43.3% 12.5% 30.8% 30.8% 13.3% 31.7% 31.7% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 51.1 51.1 7.0 47.1 47.1 11.0 32.1 32.1 12.0 33.1 33.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 650
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 50.4 50.4 6.9 44.8 44.8 10.0 25.6 25.6 11.4 26.9 26.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.44 0.18 0.42 0.83 0.39 0.54 0.82 0.24 0.68 0.31 0.17 Control Delay 67.7 22.3 7.4 59.1 34.1 11.6 56.7 56.3 7.9 59.8 35.2 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.7 22.3 7.4 59.1 34.1 11.6 56.7 56.3 7.9 59.8 35.2 5.8
L O S ECAECBEEAEDA
Approach Delay 24.1 32.2 48.3 41.7
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 190 15 33 407 53 62 249 0 90 84 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #138 249 56 63 510 129 103 360 44 #140 122 28 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 180 2405 789 222 2216 764 349 553 536 381 1084 539 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.17 0.41 0.78 0.37 0.49 0.64 0.20 0.64 0.24 0.14 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 109.7
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
651
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 35 7 21 8 4 37 16 1275 59 79 1038 72 Future Volume (vph) 35 7 21 8 4 37 16 1275 59 79 1038 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.889 0.850 0.993 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1636 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3510 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1763 1636 0 1763 1863 1558 1767 3510 0 1768 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 23 126 6 141
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.25 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 8 23 9 4 41 18 1401 65 87 1141 288
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 31 0 9 4 41 18 1466 0 87 1141 288 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 11.0 24.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 10.0 69.2 16.8 76.0 76.0 Total Split (%) 9.2% 20.0% 8.3% 19.2% 19.2% 8.3% 57.7% 14.0% 63.3% 63.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.0 19.1 6.0 18.1 18.1 6.0 64.3 12.8 71.1 71.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 652
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.6 10.8 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.0 48.2 10.4 57.6 57.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.66 0.14 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.12 0.05 0.02 0.16 0.11 0.63 0.35 0.41 0.23 Control Delay 45.1 22.0 45.1 44.0 1.3 45.8 14.2 41.7 7.1 4.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 45.1 22.0 45.1 44.0 1.3 45.8 14.2 41.7 7.1 4.0
L O S DC DDADB DAA
Approach Delay 34.7 11.7 14.6 8.5
Approach LOS C B B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 3 5209 3 1 3 4 3 1 2 5 2 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 35 23 14 0 35 443 106 248 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 204 532 175 557 554 175 2844 374 3020 1335 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.10 0.52 0.23 0.38 0.22 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 73.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.0 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
653
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Existing-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 21 41 236 241 63
Future Vol, veh/h 61 21 41 236 241 63
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 65 22 44 251 256 67
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 629 290 323 0 - 0
Stage 1 290 -----
Stage 2 339 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 446 749 1237 - - -
Stage 1 759 -----
Stage 2 722 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 428 749 1237 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 428 -----
Stage 1 728 -----
Stage 2 722 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.1 1.2 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1237 - 481 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - 0.181 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 14.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.7 - -
654
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Existing-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 8 268 70 2 259
Future Vol, veh/h 10 8 268 70 2 259
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 11 9 291 76 2 282
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 615 329 0 0 367 0
Stage 1 329 -----
Stage 2 286 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 455 712 - - 1192 -
Stage 1 729 -----
Stage 2 763 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 454 712 - - 1192 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 454 -----
Stage 1 729 -----
Stage 2 761 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 0 0.1
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 541 1192 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.036 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.9 8 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
655
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 28 267 77 61 432 135 68 520 24 100 477 67 Future Volume (vph) 28 267 77 61 432 135 68 520 24 100 477 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.993 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3508 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1759 1863 1519 1747 1863 1545 1753 3508 0 1755 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 168 168 5 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 310 90 71 502 157 79 605 28 116 555 78 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 310 90 71 502 157 79 633 0 116 555 78 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 29.7 29.7 13.2 33.0 33.0 10.0 30.7 16.4 37.1 37.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 33.0% 33.0% 14.7% 36.7% 36.7% 11.1% 34.1% 18.2% 41.2% 41.2% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 24.8 24.8 9.2 28.1 28.1 6.0 25.8 12.4 32.2 32.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 656
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 21.4 21.4 8.3 25.5 25.5 6.7 23.6 10.4 27.2 27.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.31 0.14 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.59 0.16 0.37 0.80 0.25 0.51 0.58 0.48 0.83 0.13 Control Delay 43.4 32.3 0.6 42.9 37.8 4.7 53.2 27.0 42.6 37.0 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.4 32.3 0.6 42.9 37.8 4.7 53.2 27.0 42.6 37.0 1.9
L O S DCADDADC DDA
Approach Delay 26.6 31.2 29.9 34.2
Approach LOS CCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 152 0 39 267 0 45 159 63 285 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 226 0 77 #408 32 #105 208 110 #424 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 153 679 660 238 768 735 156 1341 321 880 781 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.46 0.14 0.30 0.65 0.21 0.51 0.47 0.36 0.63 0.10 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 75.8
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 31.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 657
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Existing-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 287 51 391 339 83
Future Vol, veh/h 81 287 51 391 339 83
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 11001
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 85 302 54 412 357 87
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 923 403 445 0 - 0
Stage 1 402 -----
Stage 2 521 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 299 647 1115 - - -
Stage 1 676 -----
Stage 2 596 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 284 646 1114 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 411 -----
Stage 1 643 -----
Stage 2 595 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.3 1 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1114 - 574 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 - 0.675 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - 23.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 5.1 - -
658
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Existing-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 114 326 31 58 573
Future Vol, veh/h 56 114 326 31 58 573
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 60 121 347 33 62 610
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1100 366 0 0 381 0
Stage 1 365 -----
Stage 2 735 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 235 679 - - 1177 -
Stage 1 702 -----
Stage 2 474 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 222 678 - - 1176 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 343 -----
Stage 1 701 -----
Stage 2 448 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.8 0 0.8
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 513 1176 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.353 0.052 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.8 8.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.6 0.2 -
659
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 399 1589 465 174 1087 223 308 1001 104 171 685 184 Future Volume (vph) 399 1589 465 174 1087 223 308 1001 104 171 685 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.94 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3400 5085 1486 3407 5085 1486 3372 5085 1486 3395 3539 1486 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 256 158 126 188
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 434 1727 505 189 1182 242 335 1088 113 186 745 200 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 434 1727 505 189 1182 242 335 1088 113 186 745 200 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 23.0 51.0 51.0 13.1 41.1 41.1 19.0 40.4 40.4 15.5 36.9 36.9 Total Split (%) 19.2% 42.5% 42.5% 10.9% 34.3% 34.3% 15.8% 33.7% 33.7% 12.9% 30.8% 30.8% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 46.1 46.1 9.1 36.2 36.2 15.0 35.5 35.5 11.5 32.0 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 660
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 45.4 45.4 9.0 36.5 36.5 14.4 33.2 33.2 10.6 29.3 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.87 0.69 0.71 0.74 0.42 0.79 0.75 0.22 0.60 0.83 0.39 Control Delay 61.6 38.7 19.7 68.6 39.5 14.3 63.9 41.5 5.4 59.9 50.4 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 61.6 38.7 19.7 68.6 39.5 14.3 63.9 41.5 5.4 59.9 50.4 8.3
L O S EDBEDBEDAEDA
Approach Delay 38.8 39.1 43.7 44.5
Approach LOS DDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 452 162 75 304 48 131 276 0 72 282 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) #239 520 295 #126 361 122 #195 330 35 110 357 65 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 563 2027 746 270 1601 576 445 1561 543 341 979 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.85 0.68 0.70 0.74 0.42 0.75 0.70 0.21 0.55 0.76 0.37 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 116
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 40.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
661
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 45 1860 1350 257 0 127
Future Volume (vph) 45 1860 1350 257 0 127
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 273 288
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 48 1979 1436 273 0 135
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 1979 1436 273 0 135
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 14.0 103.0 89.0 89.0 29.0
Total Split (%) 10.6% 78.0% 67.4% 67.4% 22.0%
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 98.1 84.1 84.1 24.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
662
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.5 35.4 29.6 29.6 5.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.69 0.58 0.58 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.56 0.49 0.26 0.24
Control Delay 23.9 4.4 7.6 1.7 1.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 23.9 4.4 7.6 1.7 1.0
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 4.9 6.7 1.0
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 76 100 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 97 136 25 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 692 5085 5085 1583 1502
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.28 0.17 0.09
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 51.2
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
663
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 1641 117 42 1423 190 47 104 23 314 193 112 Future Volume (vph) 88 1641 117 42 1423 190 47 104 23 314 193 112 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1545 1769 5085 1545 1767 1863 1559 1767 1863 1560 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 126 126 123
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 97 1803 129 46 1564 209 52 114 25 345 212 123 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 1803 129 46 1564 209 52 114 25 345 212 123 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 14.0 52.0 52.0 10.0 48.0 48.0 13.1 25.0 25.0 33.0 44.9 44.9 Total Split (%) 11.7% 43.3% 43.3% 8.3% 40.0% 40.0% 10.9% 20.8% 20.8% 27.5% 37.4% 37.4% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 47.1 47.1 6.0 43.1 43.1 9.1 20.1 20.1 29.0 40.0 40.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 664
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 46.5 46.5 6.0 40.6 40.6 7.9 11.9 11.9 24.7 31.3 31.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.80 0.17 0.46 0.79 0.31 0.39 0.54 0.09 0.83 0.38 0.22 Control Delay 66.4 30.2 4.7 66.9 32.9 11.5 58.8 55.8 0.6 56.6 33.3 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.4 30.2 4.7 66.9 32.9 11.5 58.8 55.8 0.6 56.6 33.3 6.3
L O S ECAECBEEAECA
Approach Delay 30.3 31.3 49.4 40.3
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 405 1 32 351 37 36 78 0 229 122 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #145 523 39 #81 453 100 80 138 0 #383 192 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 172 2332 776 103 2136 722 156 364 406 499 725 682 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.77 0.17 0.45 0.73 0.29 0.33 0.31 0.06 0.69 0.29 0.18 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 104.8
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
665
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 1812 147 112 1449 194 132 263 108 279 274 75 Future Volume (vph) 88 1812 147 112 1449 194 132 263 108 279 274 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1561 3432 5085 1546 3428 1863 1561 3428 3539 1561 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 1888 153 117 1509 202 138 274 113 291 285 78 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 1888 153 117 1509 202 138 274 113 291 285 78 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.8 57.0 57.0 11.0 51.2 51.2 13.5 33.0 33.0 19.0 38.5 38.5 Total Split (%) 14.0% 47.5% 47.5% 9.2% 42.7% 42.7% 11.3% 27.5% 27.5% 15.8% 32.1% 32.1% Maximum Green (s) 12.8 52.1 52.1 7.0 46.3 46.3 9.5 28.1 28.1 15.0 33.6 33.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 666
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 48.9 48.9 7.0 48.2 48.2 8.8 21.0 21.0 13.5 25.7 25.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.82 0.20 0.53 0.67 0.26 0.49 0.76 0.26 0.68 0.34 0.17 Control Delay 61.4 30.4 6.0 61.3 27.8 6.9 56.6 56.4 3.1 55.8 35.8 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 61.4 30.4 6.0 61.3 27.8 6.9 56.6 56.4 3.1 55.8 35.8 1.9
L O S ECAECAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 30.0 27.7 45.0 40.6
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 422 11 43 324 17 50 191 0 105 91 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 124 541 52 78 429 70 88 286 15 160 130 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 211 2478 825 224 2258 777 305 489 530 481 1112 576 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.76 0.19 0.52 0.67 0.26 0.45 0.56 0.21 0.60 0.26 0.14 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 108.5
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.1 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
667
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 129 12 98 21 7 42 58 1286 25 112 1119 31 Future Volume (vph) 129 12 98 21 7 42 58 1286 25 112 1119 31 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.867 0.850 0.997 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1575 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3526 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 1575 0 1746 1863 1540 1760 3526 0 1763 3539 1510 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 103 126 2 126
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 13 103 22 7 44 61 1354 26 118 1178 33 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 116 0 22 7 44 61 1380 0 118 1178 33 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 19.0 32.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 13.8 61.0 17.0 64.2 64.2 Total Split (%) 15.8% 26.7% 8.3% 19.2% 19.2% 11.5% 50.8% 14.2% 53.5% 53.5% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 27.1 6.0 18.1 18.1 9.8 56.1 13.0 59.3 59.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 668
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 13.8 6.3 6.3 6.3 8.5 43.2 11.2 49.1 49.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.16 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.50 0.13 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.34 0.17 0.05 0.19 0.35 0.78 0.52 0.59 0.04 Control Delay 48.2 14.0 49.9 47.6 1.9 49.1 22.3 49.6 15.6 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 48.2 14.0 49.9 47.6 1.9 49.1 22.3 49.6 15.6 0.1
LOS D B D D A D C D B A
Approach Delay 32.5 20.7 23.4 18.2
Approach LOS C C C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 6 13 4 0 35 356 67 257 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 60 41 20 0 85 476 140 348 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 332 601 132 421 446 216 2419 287 2525 1113 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.19 0.17 0.02 0.10 0.28 0.57 0.41 0.47 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.3
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
669
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Existing-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 23 30 122 285 75
Future Vol, veh/h 44 23 30 122 285 75
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 48 25 33 133 310 82
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 550 351 392 0 - 0
Stage 1 351 -----
Stage 2 199 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 496 692 1167 - - -
Stage 1 713 -----
Stage 2 835 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 481 692 1167 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 481 -----
Stage 1 691 -----
Stage 2 835 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 1.6 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1167 - 537 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - 0.136 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 12.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.5 - -
670
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Existing-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 10 143 24 2 307
Future Vol, veh/h 25 10 143 24 2 307
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 28 11 159 27 2 341
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 518 173 0 0 186 0
Stage 1 173 -----
Stage 2 345 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 518 871 - - 1388 -
Stage 1 857 -----
Stage 2 717 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 517 871 - - 1388 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 517 -----
Stage 1 857 -----
Stage 2 716 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11.6 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 585 1388 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.066 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.6 7.6 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
671
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 29 410 70 22 317 80 65 512 50 79 343 24 Future Volume (vph) 29 410 70 22 317 80 65 512 50 79 343 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.987 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3481 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1863 1520 1758 1863 1545 1756 3481 0 1760 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 120 11 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7777
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 436 74 23 337 85 69 545 53 84 365 26 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 31 436 74 23 337 85 69 598 0 84 365 26 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 35.0 35.0 9.9 35.0 35.0 12.0 31.3 13.8 33.1 33.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 13.3% 34.8% 15.3% 36.8% 36.8% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 30.1 30.1 5.9 30.1 30.1 8.0 26.4 9.8 28.2 28.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 672
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.8 20.6 20.6 6.8 20.6 20.6 8.1 18.0 8.9 21.5 21.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.29 0.14 0.34 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.71 0.13 0.12 0.55 0.14 0.30 0.59 0.33 0.57 0.04 Control Delay 37.9 28.4 1.8 37.7 23.8 2.5 37.1 24.0 36.0 25.0 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.9 28.4 1.8 37.7 23.8 2.5 37.1 24.0 36.0 25.0 0.1
L O S DCADCADC DCA
Approach Delay 25.3 20.5 25.4 25.5
Approach LOS CCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 136 0 8 98 0 23 92 28 111 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 322 10 37 239 17 80 203 91 271 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 197 1042 903 197 1042 917 268 1746 328 994 867 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.42 0.08 0.12 0.32 0.09 0.26 0.34 0.26 0.37 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 62.5
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 673
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 108 49 357 529 50
Future Vol, veh/h 27 108 49 357 529 50
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 31 123 56 406 601 57
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1148 630 658 0 - 0
Stage 1 630 -----
Stage 2 518 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 220 482 930 - - -
Stage 1 531 -----
Stage 2 598 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 207 482 930 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 342 -----
Stage 1 499 -----
Stage 2 598 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 17.2 1.1 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 930 - 446 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.06 - 0.344 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - 17.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.5 - -
674
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 59 346 71 97 544
Future Vol, veh/h 19 59 346 71 97 544
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 22 68 398 82 111 625
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1288 441 0 0 481 0
Stage 1 440 -----
Stage 2 848 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 181 616 - - 1082 -
Stage 1 649 -----
Stage 2 420 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 162 615 - - 1081 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 283 -----
Stage 1 648 -----
Stage 2 376 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 0 1.3
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 478 1081 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.188 0.103 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.3 8.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.3 -
675
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 201 961 324 68 1606 129 441 840 69 139 875 194 Future Volume (vph) 201 961 324 68 1606 129 441 840 69 139 875 194 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3429 5085 1542 3414 5085 1542 3420 5085 1542 3420 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 299 126 90 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 1045 352 74 1746 140 479 913 75 151 951 211 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 1045 352 74 1746 140 479 913 75 151 951 211 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.6 49.3 49.3 9.9 46.6 46.6 21.6 47.0 47.0 13.8 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 10.5% 41.1% 41.1% 8.3% 38.8% 38.8% 18.0% 39.2% 39.2% 11.5% 32.7% 32.7% Maximum Green (s) 8.6 44.4 44.4 5.9 41.7 41.7 17.6 42.1 42.1 9.8 34.3 34.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 676
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.6 46.4 46.4 5.9 41.7 41.7 17.6 42.4 42.4 9.3 34.1 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.53 0.45 0.44 0.99 0.23 0.95 0.51 0.12 0.57 0.95 0.40 Control Delay 89.3 30.0 7.2 63.9 57.4 7.0 80.5 31.8 4.3 62.1 60.1 16.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 89.3 30.0 7.2 63.9 57.4 7.0 80.5 31.8 4.3 62.1 60.1 16.4
L O S FCAEEAFCAEEB
Approach Delay 33.1 54.0 46.3 53.3
Approach LOS CDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 232 27 29 489 7 192 203 0 58 378 50 Queue Length 95th (ft) #160 279 100 55 #606 51 #295 246 25 94 #508 119 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 246 1969 780 168 1770 619 504 1799 604 280 1013 531 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.53 0.45 0.44 0.99 0.23 0.95 0.51 0.12 0.54 0.94 0.40 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.8
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99
Intersection Signal Delay: 46.8 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
677
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 13 1118 1813 106 0 33
Future Volume (vph) 13 1118 1813 106 0 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 115 191
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 14 1215 1971 115 0 36
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 1215 1971 115 0 36
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 12.0 106.0 94.0 94.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 9.1% 80.3% 71.2% 71.2% 19.7%
Maximum Green (s) 8.0 101.1 89.1 89.1 21.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
678
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 39.1 37.6 37.6 5.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.71 0.68 0.68 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.34 0.57 0.10 0.08
Control Delay 29.7 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 29.7 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 3.4 5.1 0.3
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 37 75 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 47 197 14 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 529 5085 5085 1583 1247
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.24 0.39 0.07 0.03
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 55.4
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
679
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 100 970 94 61 1735 116 84 222 50 200 210 106 Future Volume (vph) 100 970 94 61 1735 116 84 222 50 200 210 106 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1550 1770 5085 1550 1770 1863 1562 1770 1863 1563 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 105 1021 99 64 1826 122 88 234 53 211 221 112 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 1021 99 64 1826 122 88 234 53 211 221 112 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 59.0 59.0 10.0 54.0 54.0 13.7 27.0 27.0 24.0 37.3 37.3 Total Split (%) 12.5% 49.2% 49.2% 8.3% 45.0% 45.0% 11.4% 22.5% 22.5% 20.0% 31.1% 31.1% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 54.1 54.1 6.0 49.1 49.1 9.7 22.1 22.1 20.0 32.4 32.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 680
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.1 53.3 53.3 6.1 46.7 46.7 9.1 18.2 18.2 17.2 29.1 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.42 0.12 0.66 0.85 0.16 0.61 0.76 0.13 0.76 0.45 0.22 Control Delay 70.2 20.4 2.1 85.8 34.1 1.8 70.3 61.9 0.7 64.9 39.2 5.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 70.2 20.4 2.1 85.8 34.1 1.8 70.3 61.9 0.7 64.9 39.2 5.6
L O S ECAFCAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 23.2 33.8 55.3 42.3
Approach LOS C C E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 185 0 48 449 0 65 170 0 153 142 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #155 233 19 #125 539 17 #136 261 0 #259 219 35 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 179 2536 835 97 2301 790 158 379 448 326 556 554 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.40 0.12 0.66 0.79 0.15 0.56 0.62 0.12 0.65 0.40 0.20 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.3
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
681
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 98 1026 138 87 1698 274 169 343 103 235 257 77 Future Volume (vph) 98 1026 138 87 1698 274 169 343 103 235 257 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1768 5085 1555 3425 5085 1536 3419 1863 1555 3420 3539 1555 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 103 165 106 90
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1058 142 90 1751 282 174 354 106 242 265 79 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 1058 142 90 1751 282 174 354 106 242 265 79 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 56.0 56.0 11.0 52.0 52.0 15.0 37.0 37.0 16.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 12.5% 46.7% 46.7% 9.2% 43.3% 43.3% 12.5% 30.8% 30.8% 13.3% 31.7% 31.7% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 51.1 51.1 7.0 47.1 47.1 11.0 32.1 32.1 12.0 33.1 33.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 682
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.0 50.9 50.9 6.9 45.2 45.2 10.1 25.7 25.7 11.4 27.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.45 0.18 0.42 0.84 0.39 0.56 0.82 0.24 0.68 0.31 0.18 Control Delay 69.0 22.4 7.6 59.3 34.7 11.8 57.2 56.5 7.9 60.1 35.4 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.0 22.4 7.6 59.3 34.7 11.8 57.2 56.5 7.9 60.1 35.4 6.4
L O S ECAECBEEAEDA
Approach Delay 24.4 32.7 48.6 41.7
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 195 16 33 417 54 63 249 0 90 84 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #148 255 57 63 523 131 105 360 44 #140 122 31 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 178 2386 784 220 2199 758 346 549 532 378 1075 535 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.44 0.18 0.41 0.80 0.37 0.50 0.64 0.20 0.64 0.25 0.15 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.3
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
683
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 35 7 21 15 4 41 16 1279 68 83 1042 72 Future Volume (vph) 35 7 21 15 4 41 16 1279 68 83 1042 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.889 0.850 0.992 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1636 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3506 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1763 1636 0 1763 1863 1558 1767 3506 0 1768 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 23 126 7 141
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.25 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 8 23 16 4 45 18 1405 75 91 1145 288
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 31 0 16 4 45 18 1480 0 91 1145 288 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 11.0 24.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 10.0 69.2 16.8 76.0 76.0 Total Split (%) 9.2% 20.0% 8.3% 19.2% 19.2% 8.3% 57.7% 14.0% 63.3% 63.3% Maximum Green (s) 7.0 19.1 6.0 18.1 18.1 6.0 64.3 12.8 71.1 71.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 684
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.3 9.0 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.7 50.8 10.4 60.2 60.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.67 0.14 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.14 0.10 0.02 0.18 0.12 0.63 0.38 0.41 0.23 Control Delay 46.3 24.2 46.5 44.8 1.5 46.8 14.1 43.1 7.0 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.3 24.2 46.5 44.8 1.5 46.8 14.1 43.1 7.0 3.9
L O S DC DDADB DAA
Approach Delay 36.4 15.3 14.5 8.6
Approach LOS D B B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 4 8209 3 2 3 4 6 1 2 6 2 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 36 34 14 0 36 449 113 249 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 188 490 161 512 519 161 2822 344 2998 1327 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.06 0.10 0.01 0.09 0.11 0.52 0.26 0.38 0.22 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 76.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
685
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 119 25 45 236 241 134
Future Vol, veh/h 119 25 45 236 241 134
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 127 27 48 251 256 143
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 675 328 399 0 - 0
Stage 1 328 -----
Stage 2 347 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 419 713 1160 - - -
Stage 1 730 -----
Stage 2 716 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 399 713 1160 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 399 -----
Stage 1 695 -----
Stage 2 716 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 17.8 1.3 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1160 - 432 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - 0.355 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 17.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1.6 - -
686
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 8 272 70 2 263
Future Vol, veh/h 10 8 272 70 2 263
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 11 9 296 76 2 286
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 624 334 0 0 372 0
Stage 1 334 -----
Stage 2 290 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 449 708 - - 1186 -
Stage 1 725 -----
Stage 2 759 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 448 708 - - 1186 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 448 -----
Stage 1 725 -----
Stage 2 757 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12 0 0.1
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 535 1186 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.037 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12 8 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
687
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing Plus Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 28 267 77 62 432 135 68 523 25 100 480 67 Future Volume (vph) 28 267 77 62 432 135 68 523 25 100 480 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.993 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3508 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1759 1863 1519 1747 1863 1545 1753 3508 0 1755 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 168 168 5 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 310 90 72 502 157 79 608 29 116 558 78 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 310 90 72 502 157 79 637 0 116 558 78 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 29.7 29.7 13.2 33.0 33.0 10.0 30.7 16.4 37.1 37.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 33.0% 33.0% 14.7% 36.7% 36.7% 11.1% 34.1% 18.2% 41.2% 41.2% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 24.8 24.8 9.2 28.1 28.1 6.0 25.8 12.4 32.2 32.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 688
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing Plus Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 21.4 21.4 8.3 25.5 25.5 6.7 23.7 10.4 27.3 27.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.31 0.14 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.59 0.16 0.37 0.80 0.25 0.51 0.58 0.48 0.83 0.13 Control Delay 43.4 32.3 0.6 43.0 37.9 4.7 53.2 27.0 42.6 37.3 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.4 32.3 0.6 43.0 37.9 4.7 53.2 27.0 42.6 37.3 1.9
L O S DCADDADC DDA
Approach Delay 26.6 31.3 29.9 34.5
Approach LOS CCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 152 0 39 267 0 45 161 63 287 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 226 0 78 #408 32 #105 209 110 #428 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 153 677 659 238 766 734 155 1337 321 878 779 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.46 0.14 0.30 0.66 0.21 0.51 0.48 0.36 0.64 0.10 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 75.9
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 31.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 689
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 288 52 395 343 83
Future Vol, veh/h 81 288 52 395 343 83
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 11001
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 85 303 55 416 361 87
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 933 407 449 0 - 0
Stage 1 406 -----
Stage 2 527 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 295 644 1111 - - -
Stage 1 673 -----
Stage 2 592 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 280 643 1110 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 408 -----
Stage 1 639 -----
Stage 2 591 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.7 1 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1110 - 571 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - 0.68 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - 23.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 5.2 - -
690
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 114 331 31 58 578
Future Vol, veh/h 56 114 331 31 58 578
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 60 121 352 33 62 615
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1110 371 0 0 386 0
Stage 1 370 -----
Stage 2 740 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 232 675 - - 1172 -
Stage 1 699 -----
Stage 2 472 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 219 674 - - 1171 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 341 -----
Stage 1 698 -----
Stage 2 447 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 0 0.8
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 510 1171 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.355 0.053 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.9 8.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.6 0.2 -
691
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 399 1615 470 179 1112 228 313 1001 109 176 685 184 Future Volume (vph) 399 1615 470 179 1112 228 313 1001 109 176 685 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.94 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3400 5085 1486 3408 5085 1486 3372 5085 1486 3395 3539 1486 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 256 159 126 188
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 434 1755 511 195 1209 248 340 1088 118 191 745 200 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 434 1755 511 195 1209 248 340 1088 118 191 745 200 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 23.0 51.0 51.0 13.1 41.1 41.1 19.0 40.4 40.4 15.5 36.9 36.9 Total Split (%) 19.2% 42.5% 42.5% 10.9% 34.3% 34.3% 15.8% 33.7% 33.7% 12.9% 30.8% 30.8% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 46.1 46.1 9.1 36.2 36.2 15.0 35.5 35.5 11.5 32.0 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 692
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 45.9 45.9 9.0 37.0 37.0 14.4 33.2 33.2 10.6 29.3 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.88 0.69 0.73 0.75 0.43 0.80 0.75 0.23 0.61 0.84 0.39 Control Delay 62.1 39.3 20.1 70.2 39.9 14.7 65.0 41.8 5.9 60.5 50.7 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.1 39.3 20.1 70.2 39.9 14.7 65.0 41.8 5.9 60.5 50.7 8.3
L O S EDCEDBEDAEDA
Approach Delay 39.3 39.7 44.1 44.9
Approach LOS DDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 463 167 77 314 51 133 276 0 74 282 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) #239 532 305 #131 371 127 #200 330 39 113 357 65 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 560 2016 743 268 1614 580 443 1552 541 339 973 545 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.78 0.87 0.69 0.73 0.75 0.43 0.77 0.70 0.22 0.56 0.77 0.37 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 116.5
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88
Intersection Signal Delay: 41.4 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
693
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 45 1896 1385 257 0 127
Future Volume (vph) 45 1896 1385 257 0 127
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 273 281
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 48 2017 1473 273 0 135
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 2017 1473 273 0 135
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 14.0 103.0 89.0 89.0 29.0
Total Split (%) 10.6% 78.0% 67.4% 67.4% 22.0%
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 98.1 84.1 84.1 24.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
694
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.5 36.6 30.8 30.8 5.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.70 0.59 0.59 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.57 0.49 0.26 0.24
Control Delay 24.6 4.4 7.6 1.7 1.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.6 4.4 7.6 1.7 1.0
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 4.8 6.6 1.0
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 79 103 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 100 141 25 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 677 5085 5085 1583 1472
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.40 0.29 0.17 0.09
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 52.4
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
695
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 1641 153 84 1423 190 82 109 63 314 198 112 Future Volume (vph) 88 1641 153 84 1423 190 82 109 63 314 198 112 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1545 1769 5085 1545 1767 1863 1559 1767 1863 1560 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 126 126 123
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 97 1803 168 92 1564 209 90 120 69 345 218 123 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 1803 168 92 1564 209 90 120 69 345 218 123 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 14.0 52.0 52.0 10.0 48.0 48.0 13.1 25.0 25.0 33.0 44.9 44.9 Total Split (%) 11.7% 43.3% 43.3% 8.3% 40.0% 40.0% 10.9% 20.8% 20.8% 27.5% 37.4% 37.4% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 47.1 47.1 6.0 43.1 43.1 9.1 20.1 20.1 29.0 40.0 40.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 696
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 45.1 45.1 6.1 41.8 41.8 8.7 12.3 12.3 25.0 28.5 28.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.06 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.23 0.27 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.84 0.23 0.92 0.78 0.31 0.62 0.56 0.24 0.83 0.44 0.24 Control Delay 67.6 32.6 7.6 123.7 32.8 11.5 69.6 56.3 2.2 57.7 35.3 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.6 32.6 7.6 123.7 32.8 11.5 69.6 56.3 2.2 57.7 35.3 6.5
L O S ECAFCBEEAEDA
Approach Delay 32.2 34.9 47.2 41.4
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 409 17 67 354 38 63 82 0 230 127 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #146 527 64 #183 457 101 #141 144 3 #386 197 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 168 2277 761 100 2085 708 153 356 400 487 708 669 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.79 0.22 0.92 0.75 0.30 0.59 0.34 0.17 0.71 0.31 0.18 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 106.5
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.4 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
697
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 93 1842 152 112 1481 194 137 263 108 279 274 80 Future Volume (vph) 93 1842 152 112 1481 194 137 263 108 279 274 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1561 3432 5085 1546 3428 1863 1561 3428 3539 1561 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 97 1919 158 117 1543 202 143 274 113 291 285 83 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 1919 158 117 1543 202 143 274 113 291 285 83 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.8 57.0 57.0 11.0 51.2 51.2 13.5 33.0 33.0 19.0 38.5 38.5 Total Split (%) 14.0% 47.5% 47.5% 9.2% 42.7% 42.7% 11.3% 27.5% 27.5% 15.8% 32.1% 32.1% Maximum Green (s) 12.8 52.1 52.1 7.0 46.3 46.3 9.5 28.1 28.1 15.0 33.6 33.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 698
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.6 49.7 49.7 7.0 46.1 46.1 8.9 21.1 21.1 13.5 25.7 25.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.83 0.20 0.53 0.72 0.27 0.51 0.76 0.26 0.69 0.34 0.18 Control Delay 62.6 30.7 6.2 61.8 29.7 7.0 57.3 57.0 3.1 56.3 36.1 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.6 30.7 6.2 61.8 29.7 7.0 57.3 57.0 3.1 56.3 36.1 2.5
L O S ECAECAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 30.3 29.3 45.6 40.8
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 433 13 43 336 17 52 191 0 105 91 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 556 55 78 442 70 90 286 15 160 130 13 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 209 2454 818 222 2222 767 302 485 526 477 1101 572 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.78 0.19 0.53 0.69 0.26 0.47 0.56 0.21 0.61 0.26 0.15 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 109.3
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
699
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 129 12 98 31 7 47 58 1291 36 117 1124 31 Future Volume (vph) 129 12 98 31 7 47 58 1291 36 117 1124 31 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.867 0.850 0.996 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1575 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3521 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 1575 0 1746 1863 1540 1760 3521 0 1763 3539 1510 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 103 126 3 126
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 13 103 33 7 49 61 1359 38 123 1183 33 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 116 0 33 7 49 61 1397 0 123 1183 33 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 19.0 32.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 13.8 61.0 17.0 64.2 64.2 Total Split (%) 15.8% 26.7% 8.3% 19.2% 19.2% 11.5% 50.8% 14.2% 53.5% 53.5% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 27.1 6.0 18.1 18.1 9.8 56.1 13.0 59.3 59.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 700
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 14.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 8.5 43.8 11.4 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.16 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.49 0.13 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.34 0.27 0.05 0.22 0.36 0.81 0.55 0.60 0.04 Control Delay 50.2 14.2 52.6 47.9 2.2 50.6 24.3 51.8 16.5 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 50.2 14.2 52.6 47.9 2.2 50.6 24.3 51.8 16.5 0.1
LOS D B D D A D C D B A
Approach Delay 33.7 24.5 25.4 19.4
Approach LOS C C C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 79 7 20 4 0 36 369 71 259 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 60 55 20 0 85 486 145 350 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 318 581 127 404 432 207 2326 275 2430 1076 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.20 0.26 0.02 0.11 0.29 0.60 0.45 0.49 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 89.4
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81
Intersection Signal Delay: 23.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
701
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 124 28 35 122 285 158
Future Vol, veh/h 124 28 35 122 285 158
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 135 30 38 133 310 172
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 605 396 482 0 - 0
Stage 1 396 -----
Stage 2 209 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 461 653 1081 - - -
Stage 1 680 -----
Stage 2 826 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 443 653 1081 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 443 -----
Stage 1 654 -----
Stage 2 826 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.7 1.9 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1081 - 471 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - 0.351 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 16.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1.6 - -
702
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 10 148 24 2 312
Future Vol, veh/h 25 10 148 24 2 312
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 28 11 164 27 2 347
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 529 178 0 0 191 0
Stage 1 178 -----
Stage 2 351 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 510 865 - - 1383 -
Stage 1 853 -----
Stage 2 713 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 509 865 - - 1383 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 509 -----
Stage 1 853 -----
Stage 2 712 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11.7 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 577 1383 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.067 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.7 7.6 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
703
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing Plus Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 29 410 70 23 317 80 65 516 51 79 347 24 Future Volume (vph) 29 410 70 23 317 80 65 516 51 79 347 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.987 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3480 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1863 1520 1758 1863 1545 1756 3480 0 1760 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 120 12 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7777
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 436 74 24 337 85 69 549 54 84 369 26 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 31 436 74 24 337 85 69 603 0 84 369 26 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 35.0 35.0 9.9 35.0 35.0 12.0 31.3 13.8 33.1 33.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 13.3% 34.8% 15.3% 36.8% 36.8% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 30.1 30.1 5.9 30.1 30.1 8.0 26.4 9.8 28.2 28.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 704
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Existing Plus Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.8 20.7 20.7 6.8 20.7 20.7 8.1 18.1 8.9 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.29 0.14 0.34 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.71 0.13 0.13 0.55 0.14 0.30 0.59 0.33 0.58 0.04 Control Delay 37.9 28.4 1.8 37.8 23.9 2.5 37.2 24.0 36.1 25.1 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.9 28.4 1.8 37.8 23.9 2.5 37.2 24.0 36.1 25.1 0.1
L O S DCADCADC DCA
Approach Delay 25.3 20.6 25.4 25.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 136 0 8 98 0 23 93 28 113 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 322 10 38 239 17 80 205 91 274 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 197 1041 902 197 1041 916 267 1741 327 992 865 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.42 0.08 0.12 0.32 0.09 0.26 0.35 0.26 0.37 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 62.7
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 705
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 108 49 363 550 50
Future Vol, veh/h 27 108 49 363 550 50
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 31 123 56 413 625 57
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1179 654 682 0 - 0
Stage 1 654 -----
Stage 2 525 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 211 467 911 - - -
Stage 1 517 -----
Stage 2 593 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 198 467 911 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 332 -----
Stage 1 485 -----
Stage 2 593 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 17.9 1.1 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 911 - 432 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 - 0.355 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - 17.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.6 - -
706
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 59 352 71 97 565
Future Vol, veh/h 19 59 352 71 97 565
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 22 68 405 82 111 649
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1319 448 0 0 488 0
Stage 1 447 -----
Stage 2 872 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 173 611 - - 1075 -
Stage 1 644 -----
Stage 2 409 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 155 610 - - 1074 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 276 -----
Stage 1 643 -----
Stage 2 366 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 0 1.3
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 471 1074 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.19 0.104 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.4 8.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.3 -
707
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 201 969 359 72 1608 130 450 845 69 143 892 194 Future Volume (vph) 201 969 359 72 1608 130 450 845 69 143 892 194 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3429 5085 1542 3414 5085 1542 3421 5085 1542 3420 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 287 126 90 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 1053 390 78 1748 141 489 918 75 155 970 211 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 1053 390 78 1748 141 489 918 75 155 970 211 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 12.2 47.6 47.6 10.6 46.0 46.0 21.2 47.7 47.7 14.1 40.6 40.6 Total Split (%) 10.2% 39.7% 39.7% 8.8% 38.3% 38.3% 17.7% 39.8% 39.8% 11.8% 33.8% 33.8% Maximum Green (s) 8.2 42.7 42.7 6.6 41.1 41.1 17.2 42.8 42.8 10.1 35.7 35.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 708
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.2 44.8 44.8 6.5 41.1 41.1 17.2 42.8 42.8 9.5 35.1 35.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.55 0.51 0.42 1.00 0.23 0.99 0.50 0.12 0.57 0.93 0.39 Control Delay 98.1 31.4 10.7 62.0 60.7 7.2 89.3 31.2 4.2 61.6 57.1 15.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 98.1 31.4 10.7 62.0 60.7 7.2 89.3 31.2 4.2 61.6 57.1 15.9
L O S FCBEEAFCAEEB
Approach Delay 35.3 56.9 49.0 51.1
Approach LOS D E D D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 241 55 30 ~497 8 197 202 0 60 382 49 Queue Length 95th (ft) #164 288 148 56 #615 52 #309 246 25 95 #508 117 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 235 1910 758 189 1749 612 494 1827 611 289 1057 548 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.55 0.51 0.41 1.00 0.23 0.99 0.50 0.12 0.54 0.92 0.39 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.4
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
Intersection Signal Delay: 48.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
709
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 13 1130 1820 106 0 33
Future Volume (vph) 13 1130 1820 106 0 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 115 191
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 14 1228 1978 115 0 36
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 1228 1978 115 0 36
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 12.0 106.0 94.0 94.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 9.1% 80.3% 71.2% 71.2% 19.7%
Maximum Green (s) 8.0 101.1 89.1 89.1 21.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
710
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.1 39.1 37.7 37.7 5.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.34 0.57 0.10 0.08
Control Delay 29.8 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 29.8 3.1 5.4 1.1 0.3
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 3.4 5.1 0.3
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 38 76 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 47 198 14 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 528 5085 5085 1583 1245
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.24 0.39 0.07 0.03
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 55.5
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Signal Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
711
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 100 970 106 126 1735 116 91 228 67 200 231 106 Future Volume (vph) 100 970 106 126 1735 116 91 228 67 200 231 106 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1550 1770 5085 1550 1770 1863 1563 1770 1863 1563 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 163 126 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 105 1021 112 133 1826 122 96 240 71 211 243 112 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 1021 112 133 1826 122 96 240 71 211 243 112 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 47.5 47.5 20.5 53.0 53.0 17.1 28.0 28.0 24.0 34.9 34.9 Total Split (%) 12.5% 39.6% 39.6% 17.1% 44.2% 44.2% 14.3% 23.3% 23.3% 20.0% 29.1% 29.1% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 42.6 42.6 16.5 48.1 48.1 13.1 23.1 23.1 20.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 712
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.1 43.1 43.1 13.1 46.1 46.1 10.7 18.7 18.7 17.2 28.0 28.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.39 0.39 0.12 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.51 0.16 0.63 0.86 0.17 0.56 0.76 0.18 0.77 0.51 0.23 Control Delay 69.9 28.0 1.6 62.0 35.1 4.4 62.7 60.8 1.0 64.8 42.0 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.9 28.0 1.6 62.0 35.1 4.4 62.7 60.8 1.0 64.8 42.0 6.0
L O S ECAEDAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 29.2 35.0 50.8 43.4
Approach LOS CDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 211 0 96 451 0 70 173 0 151 160 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #155 278 12 164 547 36 128 265 0 #259 247 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 179 2059 724 269 2255 757 213 396 461 326 515 523 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.50 0.15 0.49 0.81 0.16 0.45 0.61 0.15 0.65 0.47 0.21 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
713
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 104 1034 141 87 1732 274 179 343 103 235 257 98 Future Volume (vph) 104 1034 141 87 1732 274 179 343 103 235 257 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1768 5085 1555 3425 5085 1536 3419 1863 1555 3420 3539 1555 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 106 164 106 101
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 107 1066 145 90 1786 282 185 354 106 242 265 101 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 1066 145 90 1786 282 185 354 106 242 265 101 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 15.0 57.0 57.0 11.0 53.0 53.0 15.5 36.0 36.0 16.0 36.5 36.5 Total Split (%) 12.5% 47.5% 47.5% 9.2% 44.2% 44.2% 12.9% 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 30.4% 30.4% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 52.1 52.1 7.0 48.1 48.1 11.5 31.1 31.1 12.0 31.6 31.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 714
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.2 52.0 52.0 6.9 46.2 46.2 10.5 25.5 25.5 11.4 26.5 26.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.45 0.19 0.43 0.85 0.38 0.57 0.83 0.24 0.69 0.32 0.23 Control Delay 71.3 22.1 7.3 59.7 34.8 11.6 57.6 58.5 8.1 60.8 36.4 8.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.3 22.1 7.3 59.7 34.8 11.6 57.6 58.5 8.1 60.8 36.4 8.1
L O S ECAECBEEAEDA
Approach Delay 24.4 32.9 49.9 41.4
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 198 16 34 433 55 69 252 0 91 86 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #159 253 57 63 530 130 110 364 44 #140 124 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 177 2407 792 218 2223 763 358 526 515 374 1016 518 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.44 0.18 0.41 0.80 0.37 0.52 0.67 0.21 0.65 0.26 0.19 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 111.3
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
715
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 35 7 21 26 4 55 16 1279 111 135 1042 72 Future Volume (vph) 35 7 21 26 4 55 16 1279 111 135 1042 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.889 0.850 0.988 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1636 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3489 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1763 1636 0 1763 1863 1558 1767 3489 0 1768 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 23 126 11 144
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.25 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 8 23 29 4 60 18 1405 122 148 1145 288 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 31 0 29 4 60 18 1527 0 148 1145 288 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.0 23.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 10.0 67.0 20.0 77.0 77.0 Total Split (%) 8.3% 19.2% 8.3% 19.2% 19.2% 8.3% 55.8% 16.7% 64.2% 64.2% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 18.1 6.0 18.1 18.1 6.0 62.1 16.0 72.1 72.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 716
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.3 6.8 6.3 6.8 6.8 6.3 49.2 12.9 64.8 64.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.58 0.15 0.76 0.76 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.21 0.22 0.03 0.25 0.14 0.76 0.55 0.43 0.24 Control Delay 52.5 27.2 51.0 46.5 2.5 50.0 18.7 47.3 7.0 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 52.5 27.2 51.0 46.5 2.5 50.0 18.7 47.3 7.0 3.7
L O S DC DDADB DAA
Approach Delay 41.1 19.5 19.0 10.2
Approach LOS D B B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 5 17 2 0 10 371 83 122 22
Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 36 51 14 0 37 513 167 248 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 134 392 134 426 454 134 2639 358 2909 1292 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.08 0.22 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.58 0.41 0.39 0.22 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.5
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
717
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 149 31 66 236 241 232
Future Vol, veh/h 149 31 66 236 241 232
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 159 33 70 251 256 247
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 771 380 503 0 - 0
Stage 1 380 -----
Stage 2 391 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 368 667 1061 - - -
Stage 1 691 -----
Stage 2 683 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 340 667 1061 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 340 -----
Stage 1 638 -----
Stage 2 683 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 24.6 1.9 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1061 - 371 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 - 0.516 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 0 24.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2.8 - -
718
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 8 293 70 2 269
Future Vol, veh/h 10 8 293 70 2 269
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 11 9 318 76 2 292
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 652 356 0 0 394 0
Stage 1 356 -----
Stage 2 296 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 433 688 - - 1165 -
Stage 1 709 -----
Stage 2 755 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 432 688 - - 1165 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 432 -----
Stage 1 709 -----
Stage 2 753 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.2 0 0.1
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 518 1165 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.038 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.2 8.1 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
719
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Near-Term With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 28 267 77 72 432 135 68 526 28 100 491 67 Future Volume (vph) 28 267 77 72 432 135 68 526 28 100 491 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.992 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3504 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1759 1863 1519 1747 1863 1545 1754 3504 0 1755 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 120 6 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 310 90 84 502 157 79 612 33 116 571 78 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 310 90 84 502 157 79 645 0 116 571 78 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 31.9 31.9 11.0 33.0 33.0 10.0 33.9 13.2 37.1 37.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 35.4% 35.4% 12.2% 36.7% 36.7% 11.1% 37.7% 14.7% 41.2% 41.2% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 27.0 27.0 7.0 28.1 28.1 6.0 29.0 9.2 32.2 32.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 720
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Near-Term With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.3 22.7 22.7 7.3 25.6 25.6 6.6 25.3 9.1 27.6 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.33 0.12 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.56 0.17 0.50 0.80 0.26 0.52 0.55 0.55 0.85 0.12 Control Delay 43.5 30.2 3.2 50.6 38.0 9.1 53.8 24.9 48.9 38.4 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.5 30.2 3.2 50.6 38.0 9.1 53.8 24.9 48.9 38.4 1.9
L O S DCADDADC DDA
Approach Delay 25.6 33.3 28.1 36.3
Approach LOS CCCD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 147 0 47 267 15 45 157 65 296 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 217 18 #102 #408 54 #105 200 #126 #444 10 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 150 724 664 178 754 696 153 1468 234 864 769 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.43 0.14 0.47 0.67 0.23 0.52 0.44 0.50 0.66 0.10 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 76.3
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay: 31.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 721
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 288 52 419 354 83
Future Vol, veh/h 81 288 52 419 354 83
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 11001
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 85 303 55 441 373 87
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 970 419 461 0 - 0
Stage 1 418 -----
Stage 2 552 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 281 634 1100 - - -
Stage 1 664 -----
Stage 2 577 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 266 633 1099 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 396 -----
Stage 1 630 -----
Stage 2 576 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 24.8 0.9 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1099 - 559 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 - 0.695 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - 24.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 5.4 - -
722
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 114 355 31 58 589
Future Vol, veh/h 56 114 355 31 58 589
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 60 121 378 33 62 627
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1148 397 0 0 412 0
Stage 1 396 -----
Stage 2 752 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 220 652 - - 1147 -
Stage 1 680 -----
Stage 2 466 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 208 651 - - 1146 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 332 -----
Stage 1 679 -----
Stage 2 440 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.4 0 0.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 494 1146 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.366 0.054 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.4 8.3 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.7 0.2 -
723
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 399 1619 487 181 1122 233 352 1020 109 178 694 184 Future Volume (vph) 399 1619 487 181 1122 233 352 1020 109 178 694 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.94 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 5085 1486 3408 5085 1486 3373 5085 1486 3396 3539 1485 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 279 163 126 182
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 434 1760 529 197 1220 253 383 1109 118 193 754 200 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 434 1760 529 197 1220 253 383 1109 118 193 754 200 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 22.5 50.7 50.7 13.5 41.7 41.7 20.7 40.0 40.0 15.8 35.1 35.1 Total Split (%) 18.8% 42.3% 42.3% 11.3% 34.8% 34.8% 17.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.2% 29.3% 29.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.5 45.8 45.8 9.5 36.8 36.8 16.7 35.1 35.1 11.8 30.2 30.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 724
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.7 45.8 45.8 9.3 37.4 37.4 16.0 33.9 33.9 10.9 28.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.14 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.89 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.43 0.82 0.76 0.23 0.61 0.87 0.40 Control Delay 64.3 40.8 20.0 69.5 40.2 14.5 65.0 42.2 5.9 60.5 55.0 9.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 64.3 40.8 20.0 69.5 40.2 14.5 65.0 42.2 5.9 60.5 55.0 9.4
L O S EDBEDBEDAEDA
Approach Delay 40.5 39.8 44.9 48.0
Approach LOS DDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 467 166 78 315 51 150 284 0 74 293 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) #245 536 306 #128 372 127 #219 339 39 114 #376 72 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 539 1978 748 276 1616 583 487 1522 533 344 908 516 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.89 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.43 0.79 0.73 0.22 0.56 0.83 0.39 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 117.8
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay: 42.5 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
725
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 45 1902 1402 257 0 127
Future Volume (vph) 45 1902 1402 257 0 127
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 0 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 273 278
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 48 2023 1491 273 0 135
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 2023 1491 273 0 135
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7488 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 14.0 103.0 89.0 89.0 29.0
Total Split (%) 10.6% 78.0% 67.4% 67.4% 22.0%
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 98.1 84.1 84.1 24.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
726
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.5 37.0 31.2 31.2 5.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.70 0.59 0.59 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.57 0.50 0.26 0.25
Control Delay 24.9 4.4 7.5 1.6 1.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.9 4.4 7.5 1.6 1.1
LOS C A A A A
Approach Delay 4.8 6.6 1.1
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 79 105 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 100 143 25 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 673 5085 5085 1583 1463
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.40 0.29 0.17 0.09
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 52.8
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Signal Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
727
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 88 1641 159 115 1423 190 99 133 136 314 209 112 Future Volume (vph) 88 1641 159 115 1423 190 99 133 136 314 209 112 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1545 1769 5085 1545 1767 1863 1559 1767 1863 1560 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 126 126 123
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 97 1803 175 126 1564 209 109 146 149 345 230 123 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 1803 175 126 1564 209 109 146 149 345 230 123 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 13.7 50.0 50.0 15.0 51.3 51.3 18.9 24.0 24.0 31.0 36.1 36.1 Total Split (%) 11.4% 41.7% 41.7% 12.5% 42.8% 42.8% 15.8% 20.0% 20.0% 25.8% 30.1% 30.1% Maximum Green (s) 9.7 45.1 45.1 11.0 46.4 46.4 14.9 19.1 19.1 27.0 31.2 31.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 728
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.2 44.4 44.4 10.6 45.7 45.7 11.7 13.9 13.9 24.9 27.1 27.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.89 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.30 0.59 0.63 0.49 0.88 0.51 0.26 Control Delay 73.9 39.1 9.0 78.3 31.8 11.1 62.1 59.7 17.3 66.0 41.6 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 73.9 39.1 9.0 78.3 31.8 11.1 62.1 59.7 17.3 66.0 41.6 7.6
L O S EDAECBEEBEDA
Approach Delay 38.2 32.6 44.7 47.7
Approach LOS DCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 454 23 92 360 38 78 104 15 245 146 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #154 #597 74 #198 449 98 141 173 77 #422 231 47 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 154 2066 702 175 2126 719 237 320 372 430 524 527 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.87 0.25 0.72 0.74 0.29 0.46 0.46 0.40 0.80 0.44 0.23 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 111.7
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay: 37.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
729
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 117 1879 164 112 1496 194 142 263 108 279 274 91 Future Volume (vph) 117 1879 164 112 1496 194 142 263 108 279 274 91 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1561 3432 5085 1546 3428 1863 1561 3428 3539 1561 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 122 1957 171 117 1558 202 148 274 113 291 285 95 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 1957 171 117 1558 202 148 274 113 291 285 95 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 18.0 58.0 58.0 11.0 51.0 51.0 13.9 32.0 32.0 19.0 37.1 37.1 Total Split (%) 15.0% 48.3% 48.3% 9.2% 42.5% 42.5% 11.6% 26.7% 26.7% 15.8% 30.9% 30.9% Maximum Green (s) 14.0 53.1 53.1 7.0 46.1 46.1 9.9 27.1 27.1 15.0 32.2 32.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 730
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.8 50.7 50.7 7.0 45.8 45.8 9.2 21.0 21.0 13.6 25.4 25.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.84 0.22 0.54 0.74 0.27 0.52 0.77 0.26 0.69 0.35 0.21 Control Delay 65.1 30.9 6.9 62.4 30.8 7.2 57.4 58.4 3.1 56.8 37.0 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 65.1 30.9 6.9 62.4 30.8 7.2 57.4 58.4 3.1 56.8 37.0 3.7
L O S ECAECAEEAEDA
Approach Delay 30.9 30.3 46.5 40.9
Approach LOS CCDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 87 450 18 44 352 17 54 194 0 106 92 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 157 563 62 78 450 70 92 289 15 160 132 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 227 2479 825 220 2189 758 312 463 510 472 1046 550 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.79 0.21 0.53 0.71 0.27 0.47 0.59 0.22 0.62 0.27 0.17 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
731
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 129 12 98 79 7 105 58 1291 57 143 1124 31 Future Volume (vph) 129 12 98 79 7 105 58 1291 57 143 1124 31 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.867 0.850 0.994 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1575 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3511 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 1575 0 1746 1863 1540 1760 3511 0 1763 3539 1510 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 103 126 5 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 13 103 83 7 111 61 1359 60 151 1183 33 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 116 0 83 7 111 61 1419 0 151 1183 33 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 17.4 24.2 16.2 23.0 23.0 13.8 61.2 18.4 65.8 65.8 Total Split (%) 14.5% 20.2% 13.5% 19.2% 19.2% 11.5% 51.0% 15.3% 54.8% 54.8% Maximum Green (s) 13.4 19.3 12.2 18.1 18.1 9.8 56.3 14.4 60.9 60.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 732
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.9 11.9 9.7 6.9 6.9 8.3 46.6 12.8 53.6 53.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.48 0.13 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.41 0.47 0.05 0.49 0.40 0.84 0.65 0.60 0.04 Control Delay 56.6 17.0 53.6 47.4 14.4 54.2 27.1 56.3 16.9 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 56.6 17.0 53.6 47.4 14.4 54.2 27.1 56.3 16.9 0.1
L O S EB DDBDC EBA
Approach Delay 38.4 31.7 28.2 20.8
Approach LOS DCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 8 51 4 0 37 394 91 259 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #174 64 108 20 43 88 535 #191 367 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 252 405 229 358 398 184 2104 271 2292 1010 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.29 0.36 0.02 0.28 0.33 0.67 0.56 0.52 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 96.5
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.1 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
733
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 238 52 46 122 285 206
Future Vol, veh/h 238 52 46 122 285 206
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 259 57 50 133 310 224
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 655 422 534 0 - 0
Stage 1 422 -----
Stage 2 233 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 431 632 1034 - - -
Stage 1 662 -----
Stage 2 806 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 409 632 1034 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 409 -----
Stage 1 628 -----
Stage 2 806 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 31.8 2.4 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1034 - 437 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 - 0.721 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 0 31.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 5.7 - -
734
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 6th TWSC 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 10 159 24 2 336
Future Vol, veh/h 25 10 159 24 2 336
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 28 11 177 27 2 373
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 568 191 0 0 204 0
Stage 1 191 -----
Stage 2 377 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 484 851 - - 1368 -
Stage 1 841 -----
Stage 2 694 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 483 851 - - 1368 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 483 -----
Stage 1 841 -----
Stage 2 693 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 551 1368 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.071 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12 7.6 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
735
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Near-Term With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 29 410 70 28 317 80 65 528 63 79 353 24 Future Volume (vph) 29 410 70 28 317 80 65 528 63 79 353 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.984 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3467 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1863 1520 1758 1863 1545 1756 3467 0 1760 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 120 14 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7777
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 436 74 30 337 85 69 562 67 84 376 26 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 31 436 74 30 337 85 69 629 0 84 376 26 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 35.0 35.0 9.9 35.0 35.0 12.0 31.3 13.8 33.1 33.1 Total Split (%) 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 11.0% 38.9% 38.9% 13.3% 34.8% 15.3% 36.8% 36.8% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 30.1 30.1 5.9 30.1 30.1 8.0 26.4 9.8 28.2 28.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 736
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Near-Term With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/16/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.8 21.4 21.4 6.8 21.4 21.4 8.1 18.7 9.0 22.2 22.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.29 0.14 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.70 0.13 0.16 0.54 0.14 0.31 0.62 0.34 0.58 0.04 Control Delay 38.6 28.2 1.8 38.5 23.9 2.5 38.1 24.6 36.8 25.4 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.6 28.2 1.8 38.5 23.9 2.5 38.1 24.6 36.8 25.4 0.1
L O S DCADCADC DCA
Approach Delay 25.2 20.8 26.0 26.0
Approach LOS CCCC
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 144 0 11 104 0 25 107 31 126 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 322 10 44 239 17 80 215 91 280 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 193 1023 888 193 1023 902 261 1700 320 971 849 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.43 0.08 0.16 0.33 0.09 0.26 0.37 0.26 0.39 0.03 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 64
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 737
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 11.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 58 205 206 441 676 96
Future Vol, veh/h 58 205 206 441 676 96
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 63 223 224 479 735 104
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1714 787 839 0 - 0
Stage 1 787 -----
Stage 2 927 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 99 392 796 - - -
Stage 1 449 -----
Stage 2 385 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 71 392 796 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 192 -----
Stage 1 323 -----
Stage 2 385 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 64.3 3.6 0
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 796 - 319 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.281 - 0.896 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 - 64.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - 8.5 - -
738
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 73 574 93 121 764
Future Vol, veh/h 24 73 574 93 121 764
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 26 79 624 101 132 830
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1771 677 0 0 726 0
Stage 1 676 -----
Stage 2 1095 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 91 453 - - 877 -
Stage 1 505 -----
Stage 2 321 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 77 452 - - 876 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 192 -----
Stage 1 504 -----
Stage 2 272 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 20.3 0 1.3
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 339 876 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.311 0.15 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.3 9.8 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.3 0.5 -
739
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project- AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 250 1282 430 234 1956 163 554 1047 115 205 1281 263 Future Volume (vph) 250 1282 430 234 1956 163 554 1047 115 205 1281 263 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3430 5085 1536 3419 5085 1536 3424 5085 1536 3421 3539 1536 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 246 101 109 130
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 1393 467 254 2126 177 602 1138 125 223 1392 286 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 1393 467 254 2126 177 602 1138 125 223 1392 286 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 14.0 51.8 51.8 18.2 56.0 56.0 25.0 60.2 60.2 19.8 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 9.3% 34.5% 34.5% 12.1% 37.3% 37.3% 16.7% 40.1% 40.1% 13.2% 36.7% 36.7% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 46.9 46.9 14.2 51.1 51.1 21.0 55.3 55.3 15.8 50.1 50.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 740
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project- AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.0 47.3 47.3 13.8 51.1 51.1 21.0 56.9 56.9 14.2 50.1 50.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 1.19 0.87 0.72 0.80 1.23 0.30 1.25 0.59 0.19 0.69 1.18 0.48 Control Delay 178.5 55.5 27.7 85.8 149.6 16.9 181.1 39.0 8.0 76.9 132.7 23.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 178.5 55.5 27.7 85.8 149.6 16.9 181.1 39.0 8.0 76.9 132.7 23.7
L O S FECFFBFDAEFC
Approach Delay 65.1 134.0 82.8 109.7
Approach LOS E F F F
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~164 473 200 127 ~936 52 ~378 327 10 110 ~855 118 Queue Length 95th (ft) #261 537 341 #189 #1026 115 #501 381 55 155 #996 209 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 228 1601 652 324 1732 589 480 1928 650 361 1182 599 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.19 0.87 0.72 0.78 1.23 0.30 1.25 0.59 0.19 0.62 1.18 0.48 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.25
Intersection Signal Delay: 99.9 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
741
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 201 1433 2260 132 204 118
Future Volume (vph) 201 1433 2260 132 204 118
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 103 128
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 218 1558 2457 143 222 128
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 1558 2457 143 222 128
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 748866
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 19.0 106.0 87.0 87.0 26.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 14.4% 80.3% 65.9% 65.9% 19.7% 19.7%
Maximum Green (s) 15.0 101.1 82.1 82.1 22.0 22.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
742
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 12.4 88.1 71.6 71.6 12.9 12.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.80 0.65 0.65 0.12 0.12
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.38 0.74 0.13 0.56 0.29
Control Delay 55.0 3.5 15.0 3.0 53.9 10.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 55.0 3.5 15.0 3.0 53.9 10.3
LOS D A B A D B
Approach Delay 9.8 14.3 38.0
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 91 399 9 84 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 131 528 35 129 31
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 481 4541 3884 1233 706 675
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.34 0.63 0.12 0.31 0.19
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 110.1
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
743
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 247 1326 106 126 2160 259 91 271 68 320 256 132 Future Volume (vph) 247 1326 106 126 2160 259 91 271 68 320 256 132 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1550 1770 5085 1550 1770 1863 1562 3433 1863 1563 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 117 117 117 139
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 1396 112 133 2274 273 96 285 72 337 269 139 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 1396 112 133 2274 273 96 285 72 337 269 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 23.1 64.2 64.2 21.9 63.0 63.0 12.1 26.8 26.8 17.1 31.8 31.8 Total Split (%) 17.8% 49.4% 49.4% 16.8% 48.5% 48.5% 9.3% 20.6% 20.6% 13.2% 24.5% 24.5% Maximum Green (s) 19.1 59.3 59.3 17.9 58.1 58.1 8.1 21.9 21.9 13.1 26.9 26.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 744
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 19.1 62.8 62.8 14.4 58.1 58.1 8.1 21.4 21.4 13.1 26.4 26.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.48 0.48 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.57 0.14 0.68 1.00 0.36 0.87 0.93 0.20 0.97 0.71 0.32 Control Delay 110.1 25.3 3.6 72.1 53.9 14.4 116.0 89.1 2.8 99.9 59.3 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 110.1 25.3 3.6 72.1 53.9 14.4 116.0 89.1 2.8 99.9 59.3 9.0
L O S FCAEDBFFAFEA
Approach Delay 36.4 50.8 81.1 68.2
Approach LOS D D F E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 222 302 0 109 ~690 81 82 239 0 148 212 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #403 366 32 176 #821 149 #189 #405 10 #246 311 55 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 261 2464 811 244 2280 759 110 314 361 346 386 434 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.57 0.14 0.55 1.00 0.36 0.87 0.91 0.20 0.97 0.70 0.32 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 129.5
Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
Intersection Signal Delay: 51.0 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
745
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 117 1252 262 113 2079 341 257 427 157 293 320 133 Future Volume (vph) 117 1252 262 113 2079 341 257 427 157 293 320 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1555 3427 5085 1536 3420 1863 1555 3422 3539 1555 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 164 179 144 137
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 121 1291 270 116 2143 352 265 440 162 302 330 137 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 1291 270 116 2143 352 265 440 162 302 330 137 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 13.2 57.3 57.3 12.4 56.5 56.5 19.3 34.7 34.7 15.6 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 11.0% 47.8% 47.8% 10.3% 47.1% 47.1% 16.1% 28.9% 28.9% 13.0% 25.8% 25.8% Maximum Green (s) 9.2 52.4 52.4 8.4 51.6 51.6 15.3 29.8 29.8 11.6 26.1 26.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 746
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 9.2 52.8 52.8 8.1 51.6 51.6 13.7 29.5 29.5 11.6 27.4 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.07 0.43 0.43 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.58 0.35 0.50 0.98 0.46 0.68 0.96 0.33 0.91 0.41 0.30 Control Delay 108.4 26.5 9.8 61.8 48.4 13.5 59.8 78.3 9.8 84.8 41.5 8.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 108.4 26.5 9.8 61.8 48.4 13.5 59.8 78.3 9.8 84.8 41.5 8.2
L O S FCAEDBEEAFDA
Approach Delay 29.7 44.3 59.9 52.6
Approach LOS C D E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 271 49 45 588 88 102 337 11 121 115 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #210 319 111 76 #714 170 146 #539 66 #205 163 52 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 135 2241 777 241 2192 764 438 463 495 332 809 461 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.58 0.35 0.48 0.98 0.46 0.61 0.95 0.33 0.91 0.41 0.30 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.7
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
Intersection Signal Delay: 43.5 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
747
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 40 9 26 26 5 56 49 1638 111 135 1750 81 Future Volume (vph) 40 9 26 26 5 56 49 1638 111 135 1750 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Frt 0.889 0.850 0.990 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1637 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3498 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1763 1637 0 1763 1863 1558 1769 3498 0 1769 3539 1541 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 126 9 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 10 28 28 5 61 53 1780 121 147 1902 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 38 0 28 5 61 53 1901 0 147 1902 88 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 10.0 23.0 9.9 22.9 22.9 10.3 71.6 15.5 76.8 76.8 Total Split (%) 8.3% 19.2% 8.3% 19.1% 19.1% 8.6% 59.7% 12.9% 64.0% 64.0% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 18.1 5.9 18.0 18.0 6.3 66.7 11.5 71.9 71.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 748
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-A M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.0 6.7 5.9 6.6 6.6 6.3 65.4 11.5 74.5 74.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.65 0.11 0.74 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.28 0.27 0.04 0.28 0.48 0.83 0.72 0.72 0.08 Control Delay 61.7 28.4 56.4 48.4 3.1 64.5 19.6 67.3 13.2 1.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0
Total Delay 61.7 28.4 56.4 48.4 3.1 64.5 19.6 67.3 13.8 1.7
L O S EC EDAEB EBA
Approach Delay 46.1 21.4 20.8 17.0
Approach LOS D C C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 7 19 3 0 36 534 101 453 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 68 40 50 16 0 #87 712 #213 608 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 107 323 106 340 388 113 2374 206 2586 1150 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 0 2 9 60
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.12 0.26 0.01 0.16 0.47 0.80 0.71 0.83 0.08 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 100.4
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
749
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 149 32 66 281 256 232
Future Vol, veh/h 149 32 66 281 256 232
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 159 34 70 299 272 247
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 835 396 519 0 - 0
Stage 1 396 -----
Stage 2 439 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 338 653 1047 - - -
Stage 1 680 -----
Stage 2 650 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 653 1047 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 311 -----
Stage 1 626 -----
Stage 2 650 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 28.1 1.7 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1047 - 343 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - 0.561 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 0 28.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 3.3 - -
750
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 10 338 86 2 286
Future Vol, veh/h 12 10 338 86 2 286
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 13 11 367 93 2 311
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 729 414 0 0 460 0
Stage 1 414 -----
Stage 2 315 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 390 638 - - 1101 -
Stage 1 667 -----
Stage 2 740 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 389 638 - - 1101 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 389 -----
Stage 1 667 -----
Stage 2 739 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13 0 0.1
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 473 1101 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.051 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13 8.3 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
751
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Pro ject-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 42 329 95 92 532 205 84 741 30 152 605 102 Future Volume (vph) 42 329 95 92 532 205 84 741 30 152 605 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.994 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3512 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1760 1863 1519 1748 1863 1545 1755 3512 0 1759 1863 1519 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 168 168 5 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 46 358 103 100 578 223 91 805 33 165 658 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 358 103 100 578 223 91 838 0 165 658 111 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 30.7 30.7 12.2 33.0 33.0 9.9 31.1 16.0 37.2 37.2 Total Split (%) 11.0% 34.1% 34.1% 13.6% 36.7% 36.7% 11.0% 34.6% 17.8% 41.3% 41.3% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 25.8 25.8 8.2 28.1 28.1 5.9 26.2 12.0 32.3 32.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 752
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Pro ject-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 5.8 24.7 24.7 7.9 28.6 28.6 5.9 27.1 11.1 32.4 32.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.31 0.13 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.67 0.19 0.62 0.94 0.36 0.75 0.76 0.72 0.94 0.17 Control Delay 49.8 35.4 1.5 57.0 54.7 8.8 77.9 32.9 56.1 51.6 4.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.8 35.4 1.5 57.0 54.7 8.8 77.9 32.9 56.1 51.6 4.2
L O S DDAEDAEC EDA
Approach Delay 29.8 43.6 37.3 46.8
Approach LOS CDDD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 179 0 56 325 22 52 231 91 366 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 276 8 #124 #543 77 #135 304 #180 #596 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 121 568 580 168 616 623 121 1106 246 698 644 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.63 0.18 0.60 0.94 0.36 0.75 0.76 0.67 0.94 0.17 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.4
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94
Intersection Signal Delay: 40.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 753
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 131.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 201 392 283 574 422 159
Future Vol, veh/h 201 392 283 574 422 159
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 11001
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 1 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 212 413 298 604 444 167
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1730 530 612 0 - 0
Stage 1 529 -----
Stage 2 1201 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 97 549 967 - - -
Stage 1 591 -----
Stage 2 285 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 67 548 966 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 183 -----
Stage 1 408 -----
Stage 2 285 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s $ 447 3.4 0
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 966 - 327 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.308 - 1.909 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 - $ 447 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - 42.6 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 754
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
2: Peach Ave & Fir Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 82 145 712 41 75 737
Future Vol, veh/h 82 145 712 41 75 737
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 10110
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 1 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 87 154 757 44 80 784
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1725 781 0 0 802 0
Stage 1 780 -----
Stage 2 945 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 98 395 - - 822 -
Stage 1 452 -----
Stage 2 378 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 88 394 - - 821 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 217 -----
Stage 1 452 -----
Stage 2 341 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 50.4 0 0.9
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 304 821 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.794 0.097 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 50.4 9.9 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 6.4 0.3 -
755
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project- PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 482 1978 579 351 1292 284 458 1595 248 246 1163 280 Future Volume (vph) 482 1978 579 351 1292 284 458 1595 248 246 1163 280 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.93 0.99 0.93 0.99 0.93 0.99 0.93 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3403 5085 1466 3415 5085 1466 3396 5085 1466 3414 3539 1466 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 206 134 151 144
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 1938 1366 705 1239
Travel Time (s) 26.4 18.6 9.6 16.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 524 2150 629 382 1404 309 498 1734 270 267 1264 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 524 2150 629 382 1404 309 498 1734 270 267 1264 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 27.9 58.0 58.0 18.0 48.1 48.1 22.0 57.9 57.9 16.1 52.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 18.6% 38.7% 38.7% 12.0% 32.1% 32.1% 14.7% 38.6% 38.6% 10.7% 34.7% 34.7% Maximum Green (s) 23.9 53.1 53.1 14.0 43.2 43.2 18.0 53.0 53.0 12.1 47.1 47.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 756
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project- PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 23.9 53.1 53.1 14.0 43.2 43.2 18.0 53.0 53.0 12.1 47.1 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.31 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.96 1.19 0.96 1.19 0.96 0.60 1.21 0.97 0.44 0.97 1.14 0.54 Control Delay 91.7 135.4 59.3 169.2 67.9 30.6 169.2 61.9 18.0 114.0 119.3 25.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 91.7 135.4 59.3 169.2 67.9 30.6 169.2 61.9 18.0 114.0 119.3 25.6
L O S FFEFECFEBFFC
Approach Delay 114.0 80.9 78.5 103.0
Approach LOS F F E F
Queue Length 50th (ft) 265 ~928 453 ~231 497 148 ~305 608 85 136 ~756 128 Queue Length 95th (ft) #379 #1019 #720 #340 #596 256 #422 #716 169 #230 #897 230 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1858 1286 625 1159
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 220 265 140 315 215 250 200
Base Capacity (vph) 546 1800 652 320 1464 517 411 1796 615 276 1111 559 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.96 1.19 0.96 1.19 0.96 0.60 1.21 0.97 0.44 0.97 1.14 0.54 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.21
Intersection Signal Delay: 95.7 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Willow Ave & Herndon Ave
757
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 296 2263 1791 320 287 300
Future Volume (vph) 296 2263 1791 320 287 300
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 2
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 5085 1583 3433 2787
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 263 319
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40
Link Distance (ft) 1366 1380 747
Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.8 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 315 2407 1905 340 305 319
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 315 2407 1905 340 305 319
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 748866
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 27.0 104.0 77.0 77.0 28.0 28.0
Total Split (%) 20.5% 78.8% 58.3% 58.3% 21.2% 21.2%
Maximum Green (s) 23.0 99.1 72.1 72.1 24.0 24.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
758
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 00000
Act Effct Green (s) 15.3 74.5 55.0 55.0 15.1 15.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.75 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.63 0.67 0.34 0.58 0.46
Control Delay 46.6 6.6 17.2 4.1 46.5 7.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.6 6.6 17.2 4.1 46.5 7.3
LOS D A B A D A
Approach Delay 11.2 15.2 26.4
Approach LOS B B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 206 285 21 92 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 173 320 438 76 167 44
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1286 1300 667
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200
Base Capacity (vph) 838 4711 3838 1259 875 948
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.51 0.50 0.27 0.35 0.34
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 132
Actuated Cycle Length: 98.9
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Herndon Ave & Helm Ave
759
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 324 2076 159 115 1635 316 129 139 136 391 240 368 Future Volume (vph) 324 2076 159 115 1635 316 129 139 136 391 240 368 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1545 1769 5085 1545 1767 1863 1559 3427 1863 1559 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 126 163 163 327
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1380 1896 517 500
Travel Time (s) 18.8 25.9 8.8 8.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1111
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 352 2257 173 125 1777 343 140 151 148 425 261 400 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 352 2257 173 125 1777 343 140 151 148 425 261 400 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 29.0 63.3 63.3 13.5 47.8 47.8 14.5 23.2 23.2 20.0 28.7 28.7 Total Split (%) 24.2% 52.8% 52.8% 11.3% 39.8% 39.8% 12.1% 19.3% 19.3% 16.7% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 58.4 58.4 9.5 42.9 42.9 10.5 18.3 18.3 16.0 23.8 23.8 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 760
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 24.7 58.1 58.1 9.5 42.9 42.9 10.5 15.2 15.2 16.0 20.8 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.89 0.21 0.87 0.95 0.51 0.88 0.62 0.43 0.90 0.79 0.73 Control Delay 80.4 32.5 6.1 100.9 48.5 17.9 99.4 59.5 9.4 73.7 63.4 18.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 80.4 32.5 6.1 100.9 48.5 17.9 99.4 59.5 9.4 73.7 63.4 18.1
L O S FCAFDBFEAEEB
Approach Delay 36.9 46.7 55.3 50.7
Approach LOS D D E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 268 561 18 97 485 104 108 109 0 168 190 48 Queue Length 95th (ft) #459 652 58 #214 #609 199 #233 180 48 #267 286 163 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1300 1816 437 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 285 125 150 110 235 50 180 220
Base Capacity (vph) 379 2546 836 144 1870 671 159 292 381 471 380 578 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.89 0.21 0.87 0.95 0.51 0.88 0.52 0.39 0.90 0.69 0.69 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 116.7
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95
Intersection Signal Delay: 43.8 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 5: Peach Ave & Herndon Ave
761
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1736 346 264 327 141 347 341 120 Future Volume (vph) 171 2170 282 202 1736 346 264 327 141 347 341 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 0 150 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 5085 1561 3433 5085 1546 3429 1863 1561 3429 3539 1561 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 106 205 127 126
Link Speed (mph) 50 50 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1896 1276 880 485
Travel Time (s) 25.9 17.4 15.0 8.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 178 2260 294 210 1808 360 275 341 147 361 355 125 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 2260 294 210 1808 360 275 341 147 361 355 125 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 744388522166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 20.0 60.0 60.0 12.3 52.3 52.3 19.6 29.7 29.7 18.0 28.1 28.1 Total Split (%) 16.7% 50.0% 50.0% 10.3% 43.6% 43.6% 16.3% 24.8% 24.8% 15.0% 23.4% 23.4% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 55.1 55.1 8.3 47.4 47.4 15.6 24.8 24.8 14.0 23.2 23.2 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 762
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 14.9 55.1 55.1 8.3 48.5 48.5 14.0 23.9 23.9 14.0 23.9 23.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.46 0.46 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.96 0.38 0.88 0.87 0.48 0.68 0.91 0.36 0.90 0.50 0.30 Control Delay 76.9 42.8 14.6 89.3 38.7 13.3 59.6 76.3 12.2 77.3 45.4 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.9 42.8 14.6 89.3 38.7 13.3 59.6 76.3 12.2 77.3 45.4 9.0
L O S EDBFDBEEBEDA
Approach Delay 42.0 39.3 57.9 53.7
Approach LOS D D E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 135 609 89 84 475 82 106 259 13 144 130 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #242 #738 158 #156 545 171 151 #425 69 #231 181 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1816 1196 800 405
Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 110 255 165 180 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 238 2353 779 239 2071 751 450 388 425 403 710 414 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.96 0.38 0.88 0.87 0.48 0.61 0.88 0.35 0.90 0.50 0.30 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.1
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96
Intersection Signal Delay: 44.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 6: Villa Ave & Herndon Ave
763
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 143 15 109 79 9 116 72 2011 57 155 1913 42 Future Volume (vph) 143 15 109 79 9 116 72 2011 57 155 1913 42 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 80 80 140 0 165 75
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.868 0.850 0.996 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1572 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 3520 0 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1735 1572 0 1740 1863 1533 1766 3520 0 1767 3539 1500 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 107 117 3 72
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 50 50
Link Distance (ft) 468 368 920 705
Travel Time (s) 10.6 8.4 12.5 9.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 151 16 115 83 9 122 76 2117 60 163 2014 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 151 131 0 83 9 122 76 2177 0 163 2014 44 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8 6
Detector Phase 7 4 38852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 16.8 25.3 14.4 22.9 22.9 11.4 92.3 18.0 98.9 98.9 Total Split (%) 11.2% 16.9% 9.6% 15.3% 15.3% 7.6% 61.5% 12.0% 65.9% 65.9% Maximum Green (s) 12.8 20.4 10.4 18.0 18.0 7.4 87.4 14.0 94.0 94.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 764
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-P M Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 12.8 10.6 9.9 7.7 7.7 7.4 87.4 14.0 94.0 94.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.63 0.10 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.60 0.66 0.09 0.63 0.82 0.99 0.92 0.85 0.04 Control Delay 117.5 28.3 88.6 63.6 26.4 117.2 42.4 111.2 22.2 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.4 0.0
Total Delay 117.5 28.3 88.6 63.6 26.4 117.2 42.4 111.2 43.7 0.7
LOS F C F E C F D F D A
Approach Delay 76.1 52.1 45.0 47.8
Approach LOS E D D D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 137 21 74 8 4 69 931 147 651 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #291 89 #154 28 70 #170 #1281 #304 893 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 388 288 840 625
Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 80 140 165 75
Base Capacity (vph) 162 321 131 239 299 93 2203 177 2381 1033 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 0 4 4 00
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 00000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.41 0.63 0.04 0.41 0.82 0.99 0.92 1.04 0.04 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 139.7
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99
Intersection Signal Delay: 48.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 7: Willow Ave & Magill Ave
765
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 238 52 47 166 308 206
Future Vol, veh/h 238 52 47 166 308 206
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 259 57 51 180 335 224
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 729 447 559 0 - 0
Stage 1 447 -----
Stage 2 282 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 390 612 1012 - - -
Stage 1 644 -----
Stage 2 766 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 368 612 1012 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 368 -----
Stage 1 608 -----
Stage 2 766 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 41.4 1.9 0
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1012 - 396 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 - 0.796 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 0 41.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A E - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 6.9 - -
766
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
9: Peach Ave & Peach Ave. Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM HCM 6th TWSC 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 12 201 30 2 358
Future Vol, veh/h 31 12 201 30 2 358
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 34 13 218 33 2 389
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 628 235 0 0 251 0
Stage 1 235 -----
Stage 2 393 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 447 804 - - 1314 -
Stage 1 804 -----
Stage 2 682 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 446 804 - - 1314 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 446 -----
Stage 1 804 -----
Stage 2 681 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 509 1314 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.092 0.002 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.8 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0 -
767
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Pro ject-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 44 505 86 33 391 121 80 689 76 120 638 36 Future Volume (vph) 44 505 86 33 391 121 80 689 76 120 638 36 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.985 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3472 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1762 1863 1518 1759 1863 1544 1761 3472 0 1762 1863 1522 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 120 14 120
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 1391 1369 999 801
Travel Time (s) 23.7 23.3 15.1 12.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7777
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 47 537 91 35 416 129 85 733 81 128 679 38 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 537 91 35 416 129 85 814 0 128 679 38 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 6
Detector Phase 74438852 166
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 Total Split (s) 9.9 31.0 31.0 9.9 31.0 31.0 9.9 35.3 13.8 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 11.0% 34.4% 34.4% 11.0% 34.4% 34.4% 11.0% 39.2% 15.3% 43.6% 43.6% Maximum Green (s) 5.9 26.1 26.1 5.9 26.1 26.1 5.9 30.4 9.8 34.3 34.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 768
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Pro ject-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/17/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 5.9 26.6 26.6 5.9 26.6 26.6 6.0 27.3 9.3 33.2 33.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.33 0.11 0.40 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.90 0.16 0.28 0.69 0.22 0.66 0.70 0.65 0.91 0.06 Control Delay 48.7 49.8 3.3 45.6 34.5 6.9 66.5 27.9 54.2 43.6 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.7 49.8 3.3 45.6 34.5 6.9 66.5 27.9 54.2 43.6 0.2
L O S DDADCAEC DDA
Approach Delay 43.4 29.0 31.5 43.2
Approach LOS DCCD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 303 0 19 215 4 48 204 71 369 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 #514 21 50 #352 44 #126 271 #149 #598 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1311 1289 919 721
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 150 120 250 250
Base Capacity (vph) 129 599 569 129 599 578 129 1311 213 788 712 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000 000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.90 0.16 0.27 0.69 0.22 0.66 0.62 0.60 0.86 0.05 Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.7
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
Intersection Signal Delay: 37.0 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 10: Minnewawa Ave & Alluvial Ave 769
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS – PROPOSED HOTEL
APPENDIX D
IMPROVED INTERSECTION ANALYSES
770
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 58 205 206 441 676 96
Future Volume (vph) 58 205 206 441 676 96
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 1 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 1863 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 223 104
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 700 430 542
Travel Time (s) 15.9 7.3 9.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 63 223 224 479 735 104
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 223 224 479 735 104
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 445266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 22.9 22.9 19.3 67.1 47.8 47.8
Total Split (%) 25.4% 25.4% 21.4% 74.6% 53.1% 53.1%
Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 15.3 62.2 42.9 42.9
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
771
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.4 8.4 13.5 50.7 33.1 33.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.73 0.48 0.48
v/c Ratio 0.29 0.58 0.65 0.35 0.83 0.13
Control Delay 35.0 11.7 38.9 4.2 25.3 2.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.0 11.7 38.9 4.2 25.3 2.9
L O S CBDACA
Approach Delay 16.8 15.2 22.5
Approach LOS B B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 0 90 53 263 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 61 #210 113 455 23
Internal Link Dist (ft) 620 350 462
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1
Base Capacity (vph) 479 591 407 1627 1202 1059
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.38 0.55 0.29 0.61 0.10
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 69.3
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.8 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave
772
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 149 32 66 281 256 232
Future Volume (vph) 149 32 66 281 256 232
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.936
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 1726 0
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1549 1770 1863 1726 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 34 74
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1014 346 517
Travel Time (s) 23.0 5.9 8.8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 159 34 70 299 272 247
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 34 70 299 519 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44526
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 14.0 65.0 51.0
Total Split (%) 27.8% 27.8% 15.6% 72.2% 56.7%
Maximum Green (s) 20.1 20.1 10.0 60.1 46.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
773
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-AM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.9 10.9 8.0 34.6 28.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.68 0.56
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.09 0.25 0.24 0.52
Control Delay 24.7 9.7 26.6 5.4 12.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 24.7 9.7 26.6 5.4 12.9
L O S CACAB
Approach Delay 22.0 9.4 12.9
Approach LOS C A B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 0 19 35 109
Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 21 65 82 245
Internal Link Dist (ft) 934 266 437
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 782 703 389 1792 1493
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.05 0.18 0.17 0.35
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 50.6
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave
774
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 201 392 283 574 422 159
Future Volume (vph) 201 392 283 574 422 159
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 1 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1765 1545 1767 1863 1863 1546
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 413 167
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 700 430 542
Travel Time (s) 15.9 7.3 9.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 212 413 298 604 444 167
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 413 298 604 444 167
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 6
Detector Phase 445266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 27.0 65.0 38.0 38.0
Total Split (%) 27.8% 27.8% 30.0% 72.2% 42.2% 42.2%
Maximum Green (s) 20.1 20.1 23.0 60.1 33.1 33.1
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
775
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 13.9 13.9 16.7 43.2 22.2 22.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.64 0.33 0.33
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.64 0.69 0.51 0.73 0.27
Control Delay 34.2 8.4 34.5 8.4 28.9 4.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.2 8.4 34.5 8.4 28.9 4.7
L O S CACACA
Approach Delay 17.1 17.0 22.3
Approach LOS B B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 79 0 109 109 156 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 178 77 241 220 311 39
Internal Link Dist (ft) 620 350 462
Turn Bay Length (ft) 1
Base Capacity (vph) 565 774 646 1597 979 891
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.53 0.46 0.38 0.45 0.19
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 67.7
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Peach Ave & Spruce Ave
776
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 238 52 47 166 308 206
Future Volume (vph) 238 52 47 166 308 206
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.946
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 1748 0
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1549 1770 1863 1748 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 57 55
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 1014 346 517
Travel Time (s) 23.0 5.9 8.8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 259 57 51 180 335 224
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 259 57 51 180 559 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 44526
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.9 22.9 9.9 22.9 22.9
Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 11.1 62.0 50.9
Total Split (%) 31.1% 31.1% 12.3% 68.9% 56.6%
Maximum Green (s) 23.1 23.1 7.1 57.1 46.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.9
Lead/Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
777
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave Cumulative (Year 2045) With Project-PM -Improved Lanes, Volumes, Timings 04/18/2024
Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 14.4 14.4 7.2 30.9 25.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.55 0.45
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.13 0.23 0.18 0.68
Control Delay 26.7 7.7 32.6 6.8 17.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 26.7 7.7 32.6 6.8 17.7
L O S CACAB
Approach Delay 23.3 12.5 17.7
Approach LOS C B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 0 17 25 145
Queue Length 95th (ft) 190 27 60 65 304
Internal Link Dist (ft) 934 266 437
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 815 744 250 1677 1414
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 1 9
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.08 0.20 0.11 0.40
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 56.3
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 8: Peach Ave & Magill Ave
778
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
AM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Spruce
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.
They are not design drawin
gs.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Created: Friday
,
April 19, 2024 4:05:46 P
M
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Spruce.sip9
779
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
LANE SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
AM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Spruce
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Cap.
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
A
ver
.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh
Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
v/c
%
sec
ft
ft
%
%
South: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
703
2.0 1364
0.516
100
5.4 LOS
A
5.2 132.3
Full
250
0.0 0.0
Approach
703
2.0 0.516
5.4 LOS
A
5.2 132.3
North: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
839
2.0 1
108
0.757
100
8.3 LOS
A
10.2 259.1
Full
1600
0.0 0.0
Approach
839
2.0 0.757
8.3 LOS
A
10.2 259.1
W
est: Spruce
A
ve
Lane 1
d
287
2.0 568
0.506
100
12.1 LOS B
4.3 108.8
Full
200
0.0 0.0
Approach
287
2.0 0.506
12.1 LOS B
4.3 108.8
Intersection
1829
2.0 0.757
7.8 LOS
A
10.2 259.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and in tersection).
Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as spec ified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA
Standard.
Delay Model: SIDRA
Standard (Geometric Delay is included).
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
Gap
-
Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA
Standard (Akçelik M3D).
HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.
d
Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
T1
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From S
T
o Exit:
W
N
Lane 1
224
479
703
2.0 1364
0.516
100
NA
NA
Approach
224
479
703
2.0 0.516
North: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
T1
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From N
T
o Exit:
S
W
Lane 1
735
104
839
2.0 1
108
0.757
100
NA
NA
Approach
735
104
839
2.0 0.757
W
est: Spruce
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From W
T
o Exit:
N
S
780
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Lane 1
64 223
287
2.0 568
0.506
100
NA
NA
Approach
64 223
287
2.0 0.506
T
otal
%HV
Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection
1829
2.0 0.757
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capaci ty constraint where appli
cable.
Merge
Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow
-
up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity
Deg.
Satn
Min.
Delay
Merge
Delay
ft
%
veh/h
pcu/h
sec
sec
veh/h
veh/h
v/c
sec
sec
South Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
North Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
W
est Exit: Spruce
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Processed: Frida
y
,
April 19, 2024 4:05:42
PM
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Spruce.sip9
781
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
PM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Spruce
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.
They are not design drawin
gs.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Created: Friday
,
April 19, 2024 4:05:52 P
M
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Spruce.sip9
782
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
LANE SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
PM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Spruce
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Cap.
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
A
ver
.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh
Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
v/c
%
sec
ft
ft
%
%
South: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
902
2.0 1095
0.824
100
10.5 LOS B
14.6 371.5
Full
250
0.0 18.3
Approach
902
2.0 0.824
10.5 LOS B
14.6 371.5
North: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
612
2.0 957
0.639
100
7.9 LOS
A
6.8 173.7
Full
1600
0.0 0.0
Approach
612
2.0 0.639
7.9 LOS
A
6.8 173.7
W
est: Spruce
A
ve
Lane 1
d
624
2.0 815
0.766
100
14.0 LOS B
10.6 269.5
Full
200
0.0 14.6
Approach
624
2.0 0.766
14.0 LOS B
10.6 269.5
Intersection
2138
2.0 0.824
10.8 LOS B
14.6 371.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and in tersection).
Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as spec ified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA
Standard.
Delay Model: SIDRA
Standard (Geometric Delay is included).
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
Gap
-
Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA
Standard (Akçelik M3D).
HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.
d
Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
T1
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From S
T
o Exit:
W
N
Lane 1
298
604
902
2.0 1095
0.824
100
NA
NA
Approach
298
604
902
2.0 0.824
North: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
T1
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From N
T
o Exit:
S
W
Lane 1
444
167
612
2.0 957
0.639
100
NA
NA
Approach
444
167
612
2.0 0.639
W
est: Spruce
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From W
T
o Exit:
N
S
783
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Lane 1
212
413
624
2.0 815
0.766
100
NA
NA
Approach
212
413
624
2.0 0.766
T
otal
%HV
Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection
2138
2.0 0.824
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capaci ty constraint where appli
cable.
Merge
Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow
-
up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity
Deg.
Satn
Min.
Delay
Merge
Delay
ft
%
veh/h
pcu/h
sec
sec
veh/h
veh/h
v/c
sec
sec
South Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
North Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
W
est Exit: Spruce
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Processed: Frida
y
,
April 19, 2024 4:05:38
PM
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Spruce.sip9
784
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
AM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Magill
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.
They are not design drawin
gs.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Created: Friday
,
April 19, 2024 4:09:26 P
M
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Magill.sip9
785
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
LANE SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
AM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Magill
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Cap.
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
A
ver
.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh
Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
v/c
%
sec
ft
ft
%
%
South: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
369
2.0 1
143
0.323
100
5.3 LOS
A
2.1 54.6
Full
250
0.0 0.0
Approach
369
2.0 0.323
5.3 LOS
A
2.1 54.6
North: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
519
2.0 1339
0.388
100
4.5 LOS
A
2.9 73.2
Full
1600
0.0 0.0
Approach
519
2.0 0.388
4.5 LOS
A
2.9 73.2
W
est: Magill
A
ve
Lane 1
d
193
2.0 996
0.193
100
8.8 LOS
A
1.1 27.4
Full
200
0.0 0.0
Approach
193
2.0 0.193
8.8 LOS
A
1.1 27.4
Intersection
1081
2.0 0.388
5.5 LOS
A
2.9 73.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and in tersection).
Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as spec ified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA
Standard.
Delay Model: SIDRA
Standard (Geometric Delay is included).
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
Gap
-
Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA
Standard (Akçelik M3D).
HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.
d
Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
T1
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From S
T
o Exit:
W
N
Lane 1
70 299
369
2.0 1
143
0.323
100
NA
NA
Approach
70 299
369
2.0 0.323
North: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
T1
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From N
T
o Exit:
S
W
Lane 1
272
247
519
2.0 1339
0.388
100
NA
NA
Approach
272
247
519
2.0 0.388
W
est: Magill
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From W
T
o Exit:
N
S
786
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Lane 1
159
34 193
2.0 996
0.193
100
NA
NA
Approach
159
34 193
2.0 0.193
T
otal
%HV
Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection
1081
2.0 0.388
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capaci ty constraint where appli
cable.
Merge
Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow
-
up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity
Deg.
Satn
Min.
Delay
Merge
Delay
ft
%
veh/h
pcu/h
sec
sec
veh/h
veh/h
v/c
sec
sec
South Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
North Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
W
est Exit: Magill
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Processed: Frida
y
,
April 19, 2024 4:09:21
PM
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Magill.sip9
787
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
PM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Magill
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.
They are not design drawin
gs.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Created: Friday
,
April 19, 2024 4:09:29 P
M
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Magill.sip9
788
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
LANE SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [2045 With Project
-
PM (Site Folder: General)]
Peach and Magill
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Cap.
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
A
ver
.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh
Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
v/c
%
sec
ft
ft
%
%
South: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
232
2.0 988
0.234
100
6.1 LOS
A
1.4 36.2
Full
250
0.0 0.0
Approach
232
2.0 0.234
6.1 LOS
A
1.4 36.2
North: Peach
A
ve
Lane 1
d
559
2.0 1395
0.400
100
4.3 LOS
A
3.1 79.7
Full
1600
0.0 0.0
Approach
559
2.0 0.400
4.3 LOS
A
3.1 79.7
W
est: Magill
A
ve
Lane 1
d
315
2.0 945
0.334
100
9.5 LOS
A
2.1 52.2
Full
200
0.0 0.0
Approach
315
2.0 0.334
9.5 LOS
A
2.1 52.2
Intersection
1 105
2.0 0.400
6.2 LOS
A
3.1 79.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and in tersection).
Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as spec ified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA
Standard.
Delay Model: SIDRA
Standard (Geometric Delay is included).
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
Gap
-
Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA
Standard (Akçelik M3D).
HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.
d
Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
T1
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From S
T
o Exit:
W
N
Lane 1
51 180
232
2.0 988
0.234
100
NA
NA
Approach
51 180
232
2.0 0.234
North: Peach
A
ve
Mov
.
T1
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From N
T
o Exit:
S
W
Lane 1
335
224
559
2.0 1395
0.400
100
NA
NA
Approach
335
224
559
2.0 0.400
W
est: Magill
A
ve
Mov
.
L2
R2
T
otal
%HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.
Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.
SL
Ov
.
%
Ov
.
Lane
No.
From W
T
o Exit:
N
S
789
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
Lane 1
259
57 315
2.0 945
0.334
100
NA
NA
Approach
259
57 315
2.0 0.334
T
otal
%HV
Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection
1 105
2.0 0.400
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capaci ty constraint where appli
cable.
Merge
Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow
-
up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity
Deg.
Satn
Min.
Delay
Merge
Delay
ft
%
veh/h
pcu/h
sec
sec
veh/h
veh/h
v/c
sec
sec
South Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
North Exit: Peach
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
W
est Exit: Magill
A
ve
Merge
T
ype:
Not
Applied
Full Length Lane
1 Merge
Analysis not applied.
SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-
2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
|
Licence: PLUS / 1PC
|
Processed: Frida
y
,
April 19, 2024 4:09:22
PM
Project:
S:\2023\23
-
045\Analysis\Sidra\Peach
-
Magill.sip9
790
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
791
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
HERNDON AVE.
MAGILL AVE.CINDY AVE.
PEACH AVE.
EXISTING SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCESEXISTING SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCES
EXISTING VACANT LAND
EXISTING VACANT LAND
3 620
9 ELEV A29'-8" W x 7'-11" DELEV A19'-8" W x 7'-11" D
UP
UP28 RISERSBETWEEN1-2
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVCSVAN
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVR EVCS
M
M
UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314M
UP81234567910111218131415161719202423222526272821
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVR
15'-0" 14'-7"
ELEV #2ELEV #19'-8" W x 7'-11" D8'-8" W x 6'-11" D
M15'-9"22'-10"M
VAN
EVRVAN
FIRERISERFIRERISER
UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
1613 1110
22 511 122 9
20'-0"SETBACK
15'-0"SETBACK12'-1"
8'-0"20'-0"SETBACK20'-0"28'-0"20'-0"
20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"
20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"34'-0"16'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"26'-4"20'-4" 23'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"21'-4"15'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"18'-5" 15'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"33'-11"9'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"11'-3" 12'-0"20'-0"
20'-0"26'-0"
10'-0"20'-0"26'-0"20'-0"26'-0"16'-0"26'-0"20'-0"
15'-0"SETBACK
10'-0"TYP.
10'-0"TYP.
TRASH '2'
TRASH '3'
10'-0"TYP.
10'-0"TYP.
TYP.
TRASH '1'
20'-0"933
12 27'-10"14'-4"
CO-BRANDEDMONUMENT SIGN
CO-BRANDEDMONUMENT SIGNCO-BRANDEDMONUMENT SIGN30'-0"PROPOSED NEW PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED NEW PROPERTY LINE
10'10'20'6'9'
10'5'10'10'10'10'
10'5'10'10'10'10'
10'5'10'10'10'10'
10'10'10'
18 9
19 12
106"90"FRONTXFRM
106"90"FRONTXFRM
TRANSFORMER 2
TRANSFORMER 1
TRANSFORMER 3
FH
FHFH
FH
FH
FDCPVDC
FDCPVDC
14 5
1513
15 10
10 23 19
1"=30'-0"A-101SITE PLAN
1.PROPOSED ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANT- REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS2.INDICATES FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION, POST-INDICATOR VALVE& BACKFLOW PREVENTER- REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS3.INDICATES ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP TO MEET ALL ACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENTS, MAXIMUM SLOPE OF RUN 1:12, MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1:48,-REFER TO SHT A-801 / DET 8,9, & 10 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. - COORDINATE WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS4.INDICATES ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES w/SIGNAGE, LOGOS, WHEELSTOPS & ACCESS AISLES TO MEET ALL ACCESSIBILITY REQ'T.S- PROVIDE A MAXIMUM SLOPE IN EITHER DIRECTION OF 1:48 WITHIN PARKING SPACE / ACCESS AISLE.- REFER TO SHT A-801 / DET 4 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.5.PROVIDE 30' HIGH FLAG POLE WITH CONCRETE BASE ANDGROUND MOUNTED LIGHTING- REFER TO ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN FOR LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS- PROVIDE CONCRETE FOOTING PER FLAG POLE MFG. REQ'TS..6.INDICATES TOW-AWAY SIGN AT ENTRY TO PARKING AREA - REFER TO SHT A-801/DET 4B7.INDICATES CONCRETE WALKWAY (BROOM FINISH)8.INDICATES CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB PER CIVIL DRAWINGS9.INDICATES LINE OF ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE10.PROVIDE TYPE 'V' TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STDS.- REFER TO DETAIL...SHT. A-102 / DET. 13- PROVIDE HOSE BIB WITHIN ENCLOSURE FROM IRRIGATION PIPING- PAINT INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF ENCLOSURE TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING- PROVIDE 20'x20' x 6" THICK CONCRETE PAD IN FRONT OF ENCLOSURE- PROVIDE LANDSCAPE SCREENING ON 3 SIDES OF ENCLOSURES11.INDICATES EXPANSION JOINT IN FLATWORK - REFER TO DETAIL SHT. A-102 / DET. 712.PROVIDE PARKING STRIPING PER CITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STD13.PROVIDE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS PERCITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STDS.
SITE KEYNOTES:THE FOLLOWING KEYNOTES SHALL APPLY WHERE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET.14.INDICATES PREFAB CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS- REFER TO SHEET A-102 / DET.615.CONSTRUCT NEW CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PER CITY OF CLOVISPW STANDARDS- REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS16.EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP TO REMAIN17.PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION- COORDINATE WITH SERVING UTILITY CO.18.PROPOSED TELEPHONE TERMINAL BOARD LOCATION (MPOE)-REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILED REQ'TS19.PROPOSED TRANSFORMER & CONCRETE PAD LOCATION- ADJUST LOCATION AS REQUIRED TO MEET LOCAL CODES & UTILITY ACCESS- COORDINATE WITH SERVING UTILITY CO.20.PROPOSED ELECTRICAL MAIN METER & SWITCHGEAR - REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS21.PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION- DRAWINGS SHALL BE PREPARED BY OWNER'S VENDOR FORSEPARATE REVIEW & PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURSIDICTION22.PROVIDE 'KNOX BOX' AT MAIN ENTRY TO HOTEL BUILDING- VERIFY REQ'TS. WITH LOCAL FIRE DEPT.23.FIRE SPRINKLER RISER / CLASS 1 STANDPIPE IN BUILDING-REFER TO FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)24.PROVIDE ACCESS AISLE FOR ACCESSIBLE ELECTRICAL VEHICLECHARGING STATION-REFER TO SHT. A-102/DET. 425.PROVIDE 30" x48" LEVEL AND CLEAR LANDING @ EVCS & EVRRECEPTACLE- REFER TO SHT. A-102/DET. 426.PROVIDE PET WASTE BAG DISPENSER PER HOTEL BRAND STANDARDS27.EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SIDEWALK TO REMAIN- REPAIR ANY OFF GRADE AREAS PER GENERAL SITE NOTE 'AB'
28.EXISTING POLE MOUNTED STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN (NO CHANGE)29.EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO REMAIN (NO CHANGE)30.NEW 68' WIDE STREET TYPE APPROACH WITH MEDIAN ISLAND FORFOR (2) 1-WAY DRIVES PER CITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STANDARDS-REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS31.CONSTRUCT NEW 30' WIDE WIDE CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH CITYOF CLOVIS P.W. STANDARDS-REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS32.INDICATES BACKFLOW DEVICE PER CITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STANDARDS-REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS33.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BOOSTER PUMP INSIDE BUILDING-REFER TO FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)34.PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION- DRAWINGS SHALL BE PREPARED BY OWNER'S VENDOR FORSEPARATE REVIEW & PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION35.'HYBRID' INDICATES PARKING SPACES FOR HYBRID VEHICLES PERALOFT BRAND STANDARDS (2 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED)36.'CP/VP' INDICATES PARKING SPACES FOR CARPOOL/VANPOOL PERELEMENT BRAND STANDARDS (5% OF ELEMENT PARKING)
MAIN ENTRYSECONDARY ACCESS
DROPOFFDROP-OFF
DROP-OFFSITE PLAN LEGEND:MARKUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESCRIPTIONU.N.O.36" x 36" INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITYPAINTED ON PAVEMENT AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE- PROVIDE POLE-MTD. PARKING SIGN @ FRONT OF EACHSTALL & OUTSIDE OF CAR OVERHANG AREA.- REFER TO DETAILS.................... SHT. A-801 / DET. 4 & 5INDICATES ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. VERIFY w/ CIVIL- 5% MAX. SLOPE IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL- 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPEACCESS AISLE AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING- REFER TO DETAIL .......................... SHT. A-801 / DET. 4INDICATES RED PAINTED CURB FOR FIRE LANE- REFER TO DETAIL ............ SHT A-102 / DET 1 & 2NEW CONCRETE PAVING / SIDEWALK SITE ACCESSIBILITY NOTES:1.EXTERIOR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLYACCESSIBLE AND HAVE MAXIMUM 1/2" CHANGES IN ELEVATION- BE A MINIMUM OF 48" IN WIDTH- HAVE A MAX. OF 5% SLOPE IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL- HAVE A MAX. OF 2% CROSS SLOPE (1/4"/FT.)- HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS WHERE THE PATH OF TRAVELCROSSES/ADJOINS A VEHICULAR ROUTE- WHERE NECESSARY TO CHANGE ELEVATION AT A SLOPEEXCEEDING 5% (ie;1:20) SHALL HAVE AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP- THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL OFFSET GREATER THAN 14" ALONGTHE ENTIRE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE PUBLIC WAY TO THEBUILDING ENTRANCE2.REFER TO SHEET G2 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS3.REFER TO SHEETS A-801, A-802, AND A-803 FOR TYPICAL DETAILSPERTAINING TO ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT.
NEW A/C PAVING o/NEW COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASEPER CIVIL DRAWINGS AND GEOTECH REPORT & CITY OFCLOVIS P.W. STANDARD GE-32- REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXTENT OF PAVING ANDNEW UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN- PATCH & REPAIR PAVING DISTURBED BY INSTALLATIONOF NEW STORM DRAIN LINEINDICATES NEW ON-SITE POLE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURES- REFER TO ELECTRICAL SITE PLANL.S.LANDSCAPE AREA- REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANSEVCS #INDICATES NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS IN ROW
DEVELOPMENT DATA:APPLICANT/DEVELOPERAXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. LINCOLN AVE.FOWLER, CA 93625PH. (559) 834-4000ADDRESS/LOCATION:W. MAGILL AVE.(SWC HERNDON AVE & PEACH AVE )CLOVIS, CA.APN:410-031-16JURISDICTION: CITY OF CLOVISTOTAL SITE AREA: $&5(6 6)
EXISTING ZONING: R-1-AHPROPOSED ZONINGC-PGENERAL PLAN USE:OFFICEALLOWED USE:YES WITH REZONE FOR BAR USEPROPOSED USE: ALOFT / ELEMENT: 4 STORY / 242 ROOM HOTELSPRINGHILL SUITES: 4 STORY / 108 ROOM HOTELTOTAL: 350 ROOMSOCCUPANCY GROUPS:R-1, B, A-3, S1CONSTRUCTION TYPE:V-A (FIRE SPRINKLERS PER NFPA-13)LOT COVERAGE - MAX:NAFAR - MAX:N/AMAX. HEIGHT ALLOWED: ´PROPOSED HEIGHT:60'-0" (C.U.P. VARIANCE REQUEST)SETBACKS - REQUIRED:PROPOSED:FRONT (MAGILL AVE): ´20'-0"WEST PROPERTY LINE0'10'-0"EAST (PEACH AVE):10'-0"15'-0"REAR (HERNDON AVE): ´15'-0"
NOTE:1.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FORE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS2.PROPERTY CURRENTLY VACANT. ALL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARECONSIDERED NEW / PROPOSED U.N.O.3.REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL EXISTING PROPERTY LINES, SITE DATA,GRADES, HORIZONTAL CONTROL AND BUILDING LOCATIONS, ETC.
EVREVCINDICATES PARKING STALL WITH PROVISIONS FOR ELECTRICVEHICLE CHARGING EQUIPMENT PER CALGREEN 4.106.4.2 FORHOTEL USE- COORDINATE w/ OWNER FOR J-BOX LOCATION- REFER TO ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN FOR QUANTITYCALCULATIONS & SHT. A-102 / DET. 4INDICATES PARKING STALL WITH LOW POWER LEVEL 2 ELECTRICVEHICLE CHARGING RECEPTACLES (EV READY) USE PERCALGREEN 4.106.4.2 FOR HOTEL USE- REFER TO ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN & SHT. A-102 / DET. 4- COORDINATE w/ OWNER FOR 'J' BOX LOCATION- REFER TO SEPERATE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED SPACESINDICATES PARKING STALLS WITH PROVISIONS FOR FUTUREELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING EQUIP (EV CABLE) USE PERCALGREEN 4.106.4.2 FOR HOTEL USE- REFER TO ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN & SHT. A-102 / DET. 4- COORDINATE w/ OWNER FOR 'J' BOX LOCATION- REFER TO SEPERATE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED SPACESINDICATES NEW FIRE HYDRANTS, PER CITY OF CLOVIS P.W. STD.- REFER TO CIVIL PLANSFH4-STORY(136 ROOMS) 4 STORY(106 ROOMS)
4 STORY(108 ROOMS)
ELEMENTALOFTENTRYENTRY
ENTRY
FIREPUMP
MECH.
MECH.ELECT.
ELECT. ELECT.MECH.FIREPUMP
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTALELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION REQUIREMENTS (CALGREEN 4.106)- 25% REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.106.4.2.2.2 TO BE EV READY(20AMP/240V, LOW POWER LEVEL 2)- 5% REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.106.4.2.2.3 TO HAVE EV CHARGERS(40AMP/240V, LEVEL 2)- 10% REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.106.4.2.2.1 TO BE EV CAPABLE(FUTURE 40AMP/240V, LEVEL 2)ALOFT/ELEMENT SITE:253 TOTAL STALLS(64) STALLS PROVIDED w/ EV READY (EVR)(13) STALLS PROVIDED w/ ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS (EVCS)(25) STALLS PROVIDED w/ EV CAPABLE (EVC)102 TOTAL 77 TOTAL PROVIDED w/ EVCS/EVR (DEDUCTED FROM TOTAL PARKING COUNT FORACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PER 11B-208.1)ACCESSIBLE EV PARKING REQUIRED PER TABLE 11B-228.3.2.11 - VAN2 - STANDARD2 - AMBULATORYACCESSIBLE EV PARKING PROVIDED1 - VAN2 - STANDARD68 - AMBULATORYSPRINGHILL SUITES SITE:105 TOTAL STALLS(26) STALLS PROVIDED w/ EV READY (EVR)(5) STALLS PROVIDED w/ ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS (EVCS)(11) STALLS PROVIDED w/ EV CAPABLE (EVC)42 TOTAL31 TOTAL PROVIDED w/ EVCS/EVR (DEDUCTED FROM TOTAL PARKING COUNT FORACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PER 11B-208.1)ACCESSIBLE EV PARKING REQUIRED PER TABLE 11B-228.3.2.11 - VAN1 - STANDARD1 - AMBULATORYACCESSIBLE EV PARKING PROVIDED1 - VAN2 - STANDARD39 - AMBULATORY GUESTROOM BREAKDOWN:DUAL BRAND HOTEL: (ALOFT / ELEMENT)242 TOTAL ROOMS (147,082 S.F. TOTAL)ALOFT: 1ST2ND3RD4THTOTALKING: 8232222 75KING ACCESSIBLE 0 1 2 2 5 (75%)QQ: 2 7 7 8 24QQ ACCESSIBLE: 0 1 1 0 2 (25%)TOTAL 10323232 106FLOOR AREAS: 16,172 s.f. 14,820 s.f. 14,820 s.f. 14,820 s.f. 60,632 s.f.ELEMENT:KING STANDARD: 7121515 49KING STANDARD ACC. 1 1 0 0 2 (38%)KING STUDIO: 511 10 10 36KING STUDIO ACC. 0 0 1 1 2 (28%)QQ STUDIO: 6 7 8 8 29 62%QQ STUDIO ACC: 1 1 0 0 2 (23%) EXTENDED1 BEDROOM: 0 3 6 6 15 STAY1 BEDROOM ACC: 0 1 0 0 1 (11%)TOTAL 20364040 136FLOOR AREAS: 22,215 s.f. 20,618 s.f. 21,907 s.f. 21,907 s.f. 86,647 s.f.COMBINED AREA: 38,387 s.f. 35,438 s.f. 36,727 s.f. 36,727 s.f. 147,279 s.f.SPRINGHILL SUITES:108 TOTAL ROOMS (65,795 S.F. TOTAL)1ST2ND3RD4THTOTALKING: 17222222 83KING ACCESSIBLE: 1 2 2 0 5 (81%)QQ: 0 4 6 8 18QQ ACCESSIBLE: 0 2 0 0 2 (19%)TOTAL 18303030 108FLOOR AREAS: 17,156 s.f. 16,658 s.f. 16,658 s.f. 16,658 s.f. 67,130 s.f.
PARKING DEVELOPMENT DATA:PARKING REQUIRED:1.2 STALL PER ROOM(CURRENT ZONING)350 x 1.2 = 420 TOTAL REQUIREDPARKING REQUESTED:1 STALL PER ROOM = 350 STALLSPARKING PROVIDED: 358 SPACES (1.02 STALLS PER ROOM)(10' x 20' W/ 26' TWO WAY DRIVE AISLES)ACCESSIBLE PARKING PER TABLE 11B-208.2ALOFT/ELEMENT SITE:242 ROOMS TOTAL ROOMS253 TOTAL STALLS (1.05 STALL/ROOM)- 77 EVCS/EVR SPACES (PER 11B-208.1)176 PARKING SPACES FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATIONTOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED = 61 - VAN ACCESSIBLE5 - STANDARD ACCESSIBLETOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED = 62 - VAN ACCESSIBLE4 - STANDARDSPRINGHILL SUITES SITE:108 ROOMS TOTAL ROOMS105 TOTAL STALLS (0.97 STALL/ROOM)- 31 EVCS/EVR SPACES (PER 11B-208.1) 74 PARKING SPACES FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATIONTOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED = 31 - VAN ACCESSIBLE2 - STANDARD ACCESSIBLETOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED = 31 - VAN ACCESSIBLE2 - STANDARDCLEAN AIR VEHICLE SPACES - NONE REQUIRED(NOT LISTED IN 2022 CAL. GREEN CODE, CHAPTER 4)(CALGREEN SECTIONS 5.106.5.2 NOT APPLICABLE TO HOTEL/MOTEL USES PERCALGREEN SECTIONS 103 & 104)BIKE PARKING:(NOT LISTED IN 2022 CAL. GREEN CODE, CHAPTER 4)(CALGREEN SECTIONS 5.106.4.1.1 & 5.106.4.1.2 NOT APPLICABLE TO HOTEL/MOTEL USESPER CALGREEN SECTIONS 103 & 104) 2116 27TYP. @HERNDON AVE.10
10 10
36 3515TYP. @PEACH AVE.
15TYP. @MAGILL AVE.15TYP. @MAGILL AVE.30 31
21 21 2713TYP.
11114TYP.13TYP.
8TYP.
66 12TYP.
TYP.
7TYP.42643TYP.TYP.3312
5 20335 1921
26TYP.25TYP.2222
2293TYP.24TYP.1
1191920
20 7 2625TYP.
S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_A-101_Site Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 1:47:11 PM Attachment 6
792
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL AC-001COMBINED 1ST FLOORCOORDINATION PLAN
22.134567
1313.114151616.2
1920
21222324262728 333538
121110 K.8K.9L.7N.2N.5Q.2
J.2J.4K.1L.5L.8
CBA.2
NN.1PQR.1
K.8K.9
S
N.1 M.3M.8
H.9J.9L.1M.2N.3PQ PQO
363729303132
1718
DEFGH
98 JKLM
R
25 34
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
34.1 S
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
O
A.1A1
1 M.9
CBA.2
N
DEFGHJKLM
A.1A
1313.113.815.216.1 262728 33353836372930313225 3434.11211109822.13456 H.9
2122.523.819201718
16.113.815.2
T T
15.9 15.9
Q.5
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGACCESSIBLEKING(ROLL-INSHOWER)ELEV.LOBBYELEV A2ELEV A1 STAIR E2QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOSTAIR E1 STAIR A1
LND.CHUTE
KINGKING
LINEN18'-0" x 21'-6"
KINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO ICE QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOOPEN TOABOVE RECHARGELAUNDRYLINENJAN.
UP
WOMEN'SMEN'SLOUNGE
VESTIBULECHECK-INGUESTLUGGAGE/STORAGE
LAUNDRY
DININGMEETINGROOM
26'-6" x 22'-0"9'-6" x 21'-6"18'-0" x 21'-6"23'-6" x 21'-9"78'-0" x 21'-9"28'-0" x 30'-6" UP28 RISERSBETWEEN1-2
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
MECHANICAL15'-0" x 21'-6"
REF.
POOLEQUP7'-0" x 9'-0"
ELEVATOR EQUIP.19'-3" x 9'-4"LINEN19'-3" x 12'-0"JAN.
GYM46'-6" x 21'-6"UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
ICE11'-8" x 10'-8"ELECTRICALMECHANICAL
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVCSVAN
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVR EVCS
ELECTRICALM
M
8'-0" x 8'-0"I.T.R.R.UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
ICESTOR.
OFFICE 1OFFICE 2ELEVATORLOBBY11'-0" x 9'-0"9'-0" x 9'-0"EMPL.RR.15'-6" x 7'-0"CARTS KINGSTUDIOACC. w/ROLL-INSHOWER
KINGSTANDARDACC. w/TRANSFERSHOWERSTAIR A2UP
19242322212017161518252627288123456791011121314
WOMENMENENGINEER
POOLEQUIPSTOR.RR8'-0" x 11'-0"
TACTICSTOR.TACTICSTOR.
Q/Q
ELEVATOREQUIP.G.M. OFFICELUGG.I.T.REFUELFOODSERVICEREMIXLOUNGERECONNECTLOUNGE
VESTIBULEBREAKROOMFOODPREP
FIRE PUMPROOM
EMPL.REST.SALES OFFICE007WORKROOM
REF. M
J
DOUBLE QUEENSTUDIO ACC.w/ ROLL-INSHOWER
Q/QCORNERACCESS.(ROLL-INSHOWER)
STAIR E3
W/DDWGUESTLAUNDRYWxyz Bar
vct flooringFRP to 8'-0" highwith paint above(typ. for all storage& linen rooms)vct flooring(typ. for all ElectRooms) vct flooring(typ. for all Elev.Equip Rooms)
vct flooringFRP to 8'-0" highwith paint above(typ. for all storage& linen rooms) UP81234567910111218131415161719202423222526272821ADMINISTRATION18'-0" x 16'-0"19'-3" x 9'-4"EMPLOYEEBREAKROOM 13'-0" x 8'-0"
FOODPREP26'-10" x 21'-9"
STORAGE
1/8" = 1'-0"
Aloft Hotels Guest Room Type ScheduleTOTAL ACCESSIBLE GUEST ROOMS = 7 (INCLUDING 2 WITH ROLL-IN SHOWERS ON 1st FLOOR) (7 REQ'D PER TABLE 11B-224.2)REFER TO COORDINATION FLOOR PLANS FOR UNITS WITH COMMUNICATION FEATURES (12 REQ'D PER TABLE 11B-224.4)7-- Element Guest Room Type Schedule TOTAL ACCESSIBLE GUEST ROOMS = 7 (INCLUDING 2 WITH ROLL-IN SHOWERS ON 1st FLOOR) (7 REQ'D PER TABLE 11B-224.2)REFER TO COORDINATION FLOOR PLANS FOR UNITS WITH COMMUNICATION FEATURES (12 REQ'D PER TABLE 11B-224.4)1------1----1102211611--32------22061--321----62201----11------1327311319031121064--2101--11----19--313728112371112132311389379401474542542542361379 351418351418441486669486441351441FLOOR AREA(S.F.)FLOOR AREA(S.F.)----112379 --6287--1349--1349------11666----1--166600112 91911--1--1--2351------12--98----------53913--112--88--------1539131-- SYMBOLS LEGEND:MARKDESCRIPTIONU.N.O.XXXXXXXXXXWXXX2UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEKEYNOTEROOM NUMBEREQUIPMENT TAGROOM NAMECEILING HEIGHT - ABOVE FIN. FLOORACCESSIBLE ROOM w/ MOBILITY FEATURES3188'- 8"X-000LOBBY3421R16SNK-04MAGNETIC DOOR HOLD OPEN TIED TO BUILDINGALARM SYSTEM- REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE (SHEET A-701) &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS- REFER TO FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS BY OTHERSINDICATES ROOM w/ COMMUNICATION FEATURES.-- REFER TO GUESTROOM ELECTRICAL PLANSFOR POWER AND SIGNALPLUMBING FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL. SEEPLUMBING FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGN GUIDEPROJECT MANUAL MASTER & PLUMBING DRAWINGSLIGHT FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL.- REFER TO LIGHT FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGNGUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.
FURNISHING REFERENCE NUMBER- REFER TO THE INTERIOR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONMANUAL.FINISH TAG- REFER TO THE INTERIOR FINISH INDEX WITHIN THEDESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER.BATHROOM ACCESSORY MARK NUMBER- REFER TO TOILET & BATH ACCESSORY MATRIX INTHE DESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTERSECTION 10800.DOOR-REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE........... SHT. A-701WINDOW-REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE........SHT. A-710WALL TYPE-REFER TO............................ SHT. A-840 / DET. 13REFERENCE NOTESA.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS FORREQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THIS PROJECT.B.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS "ELEVATOR"CHAPTER FOR ELEVATOR PLANNING REQUIREMENTSINCLUDING ELEVATOR TYPE, SIZE, QUANTITY,PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND FEATURES PER SPECIFICPROJECT SIZE AND LAYOUT.C. REFER TO A-600 SERIES SHEET FOR ENLARGED PUBLICSPACE PLANS AND DETAILS.D. REFER TO A-200 SERIES SHEETS FOR GUESTROOM PLANSAND DETAILS.E.REFER TO SHEETS G3 THRU G6 FOR FIRE RATEDASSEMBLIES, TACTILE & STAIRWAY SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLEMANEUVERING CLEARANCES , OCCUPANCY TYPES &OCCUPANT LOADS,F.REFER TO SHEET A-200 FOR TYPICAL DEVICEMOUNTING LOCATIONS.
GENERAL NOTESA. SIGNAGE SUPPLIER MUST SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVEINTERIOR GRAPHIC / SIGNAGE LAYOUT (INCLUDINGELEVATIONS), FULLY COORDINATED WITH ANYELECTRICAL, ARTWORK OR OTHER WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS,FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.KEYNOTES1.PROVIDE DOORS IN OPEN POSITION WITH THEELECTROMAGNETIC HOLD-OPEN TIED TOFIRE ALARM SYSTEM2.INDICATES ELECTRICAL MAIN SWITCHGEAR- REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS3.2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN CABINET- REFER TO...........................................DETAIL 17/ A-8414. TYPE 'K' FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)5. 2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)6.PLUMBED EYE WASH STATION-REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS7.RECESSED WALK OFF MAT WITH FRAME.- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-6168.PROVIDE 6" HIGH CONCRETE STEMWALL AROUND WATERHEATER ROOM- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-211
9.2x6 WALL FURRING AT CORRIDOR DOOR10.INDICATES CONCENTRIC VENTS FROM WATER HEATERSPER PLUMBING DRAWINGS11.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS12.INDICATES MAIN FIRE SPRINKLER RISER IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS13.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER STANDPIPE IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS14.INDICATES DOMESTIC WATER BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS15. PROVIDE 2-HOUR RATED ASSEMBLIES AT ELEVATORSHAFT, LAUNDRY CHUTE SHAFT, STAIRWAYS AND HVACDUCT SHAFTS16.ICE MAKER LOCATION INTERIOR PARTY WALLSEXTERIOR WALLS (2x6)ATTICBATT INSULATIONBATT INSULATIONR-21R-13- BATT INSULATION SHALL BE FIBERGLASS PAPER BACKED- RADIANT BARRIER NOT REQUIRED ON ATTIC SIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING- REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-711 FOR GLAZING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.ENERGY DATA:R-38ALL WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE INSULATED AS NOTED BELOW:FLOOR CEILINGSBATT INSULATION (FULL DEPTH OF FRAMING)R-30BATT INSULATION + R-23RIGID INSULATION S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_AC-001_Combined 1st Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:22:56 PM 793
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL AC-002COMBINED 2ND FLOORCOORDINATION PLAN
22.134567
1313.114151616.2
1920
21222324262728 333538
121110 K.8K.9L.7N.2N.5Q.2
J.2J.4K.1L.5L.8
CBA.2
NN.1PQR.1
K.8K.9
S
N.1 M.3M.8
H.9J.9L.1M.2N.3PQ PQO
363729303132
1718
DEFGH
98 JKLM
R
25 34
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
34.1 S
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
O
A.1A1
M.9
CBA.2
N
DEFGHJKLM
A.1A
H.9
16.113.815.2
T T
15.9 Q.5
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/QQ/QQ/QKINGKING ACCESSIBLEKING(TRANSFERSHOWER)Q/QCORNER 2KING
Q/QKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/Q
Q/QKINGKINGKINGACCESSIBLEQ/Q(TRANSFERSHOWER) I.T.
ITEQUIP.REFRESHELEV.LOBBYELEV A2ELEV A18'-0" x 11'-6"8'-6" x 6'-9"10'-6" x 9'-0" ICELINENKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOMKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOMACCw/TRANSFERSHOWERKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTANDARDENDONEBEDROOMCONFERENCESUITE STAIR E2QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOELECTRICAL21'-6" x 8'-0"
STAIR E1
19'-0" x 7'-6"7'-6" x 16'-0"
STAIR A1ELECT.11'-6" x 17'-6"KINGICE8'-0" x 8'-0"
LINEN15'-0" x 15'-0"STAIR A2LND.CHUTE
KINGKING
LINEN18'-0" x 21'-6"
KINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
KINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDSTAIR E3KINGSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
ICE
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO
KINGEND OPEN TOBELOWW/DW/DW/DW/DGUESTLAUNDRY21'-6" x 14'-0"W/DW/DDW DOUBLE QUEENSTUDIO ACC.w/ TRANSFERSHOWERKINGSTANDARDACC.w/TRANSFERSHOWER UPDN
845671727262524231514131628
12111032192221
UPDN
84567 1727262524231514131628
12111032192221
UPDN
84567 1727262524231514131628
12111032192221
UPDN
84567 1727262524231514131628
12111032192221
DN
81234567924121110
252627282313UP222120191817
1/8" = 1'-0"SYMBOLS LEGEND:MARKDESCRIPTIONU.N.O.XXXXXXXXXXWXXX2UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEKEYNOTEROOM NUMBEREQUIPMENT TAGROOM NAMECEILING HEIGHT - ABOVE FIN. FLOORACCESSIBLE ROOM w/ MOBILITY FEATURES3188'- 8"X-000LOBBY3421R16SNK-04MAGNETIC DOOR HOLD OPEN TIED TO BUILDINGALARM SYSTEM- REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE (SHEET A-701) &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS- REFER TO FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS BY OTHERSINDICATES ROOM w/ COMMUNICATION FEATURES.-- REFER TO GUESTROOM ELECTRICAL PLANSFOR POWER AND SIGNALPLUMBING FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL. SEEPLUMBING FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGN GUIDEPROJECT MANUAL MASTER & PLUMBING DRAWINGSLIGHT FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL.- REFER TO LIGHT FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGNGUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.
FURNISHING REFERENCE NUMBER- REFER TO THE INTERIOR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONMANUAL.FINISH TAG- REFER TO THE INTERIOR FINISH INDEX WITHIN THEDESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER.BATHROOM ACCESSORY MARK NUMBER- REFER TO TOILET & BATH ACCESSORY MATRIX INTHE DESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTERSECTION 10800.DOOR-REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE........... SHT. A-701WINDOW-REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE........SHT. A-710WALL TYPE-REFER TO............................ SHT. A-840 / DET. 13REFERENCE NOTESA.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS FORREQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THIS PROJECT.B.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS "ELEVATOR"CHAPTER FOR ELEVATOR PLANNING REQUIREMENTSINCLUDING ELEVATOR TYPE, SIZE, QUANTITY,PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND FEATURES PER SPECIFICPROJECT SIZE AND LAYOUT.C. REFER TO A-600 SERIES SHEET FOR ENLARGED PUBLICSPACE PLANS AND DETAILS.D. REFER TO A-200 SERIES SHEETS FOR GUESTROOM PLANSAND DETAILS.E.REFER TO SHEETS G3 THRU G6 FOR FIRE RATEDASSEMBLIES, TACTILE & STAIRWAY SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLEMANEUVERING CLEARANCES , OCCUPANCY TYPES &OCCUPANT LOADS,F.REFER TO SHEET A-200 FOR TYPICAL DEVICEMOUNTING LOCATIONS.
GENERAL NOTESA. SIGNAGE SUPPLIER MUST SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVEINTERIOR GRAPHIC / SIGNAGE LAYOUT (INCLUDINGELEVATIONS), FULLY COORDINATED WITH ANYELECTRICAL, ARTWORK OR OTHER WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS,FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.KEYNOTES1.PROVIDE DOORS IN OPEN POSITION WITH THEELECTROMAGNETIC HOLD-OPEN TIED TOFIRE ALARM SYSTEM2.INDICATES ELECTRICAL MAIN SWITCHGEAR- REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS3.2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN CABINET- REFER TO...........................................DETAIL 17/ A-8414. TYPE 'K' FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)5. 2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)6.PLUMBED EYE WASH STATION-REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS7.RECESSED WALK OFF MAT WITH FRAME.- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-6168.PROVIDE 6" HIGH CONCRETE STEMWALL AROUND WATERHEATER ROOM- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-211
9.2x6 WALL FURRING AT CORRIDOR DOOR10.INDICATES CONCENTRIC VENTS FROM WATER HEATERSPER PLUMBING DRAWINGS11.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS12.INDICATES MAIN FIRE SPRINKLER RISER IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS13.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER STANDPIPE IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS14.INDICATES DOMESTIC WATER BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS15. PROVIDE 2-HOUR RATED ASSEMBLIES AT ELEVATORSHAFT, LAUNDRY CHUTE SHAFT, STAIRWAYS AND HVACDUCT SHAFTS16.ICE MAKER LOCATION INTERIOR PARTY WALLSEXTERIOR WALLS (2x6)ATTICBATT INSULATIONBATT INSULATIONR-21R-13- BATT INSULATION SHALL BE FIBERGLASS PAPER BACKED- RADIANT BARRIER NOT REQUIRED ON ATTIC SIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING- REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-711 FOR GLAZING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.ENERGY DATA:R-38ALL WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE INSULATED AS NOTED BELOW:FLOOR CEILINGSBATT INSULATION (FULL DEPTH OF FRAMING)R-30BATT INSULATION + R-23RIGID INSULATION S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_AC-002_Combined 2nd Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:38:27 PM 794
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL AC-003COMBINED 3RD FLOORCOORDINATION PLAN
22.134567
1313.114151616.2
1920
21222324262728 333538
121110 K.8K.9L.7N.2N.5Q.2
J.2J.4K.1L.5L.8
CBA.2
NN.1PQR.1
K.8K.9
S
N.1 M.3M.8
H.9J.9L.1M.2N.3PQ PQO
363729303132
1718
DEFGH
98 JKLM
R
25 34
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
34.1 S
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
O
A.1A1
M.9
CBA.2
N
DEFGHJKLM
A.1A
H.9
16.113.815.2
T T
15.9 Q.5
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/QQ/QQ/QKINGKINGKING
Q/QKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/Q
Q/QKINGKINGKINGACCESSIBLEQ/Q(TRANSFERSHOWER)KINGSTANDARDI.T.
ITEQUIP.REFRESHELEV.LOBBYELEV A2ELEV A18'-0" x 11'-6"8'-6" x 6'-9"10'-6" x 9'-0" ICELINENKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOMKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOM
KINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOONEBEDROOMCONFERENCESUITE
STAIR E2QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOELECTRICAL21'-6" x 8'-0"
STAIR E1
19'-0" x 7'-6"ONEBEDROOMKINGSTANDARDONEBEDROOM7'-6" x 16'-0" KINGICE8'-0" x 8'-0"KINGKING
LINEN18'-0" x 21'-6"
KINGSTANDARDQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
KINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDCOMMONSKING ASTAIR E3COMMONSKING ACOMMONSKING A-ENDKINGSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO
KINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
ICE
ACCESS.STUDIOCOMMONSACCESS.COMMONSKING
ACCESSIBLEKING 2(TRANSFERSHOWER)
LINEN15'-0" x 15'-0"STAIR A2LND.CHUTE
ACCESSIBLEKING(TRANSFERSHOWER)Q/QCORNER 2STAIR A1ELECT.11'-6" x 17'-6" DN845671718151413161211103219UP
DN84567 1718151413161211103219UP
DN84567 1718151413161211103219 UP
DN84567 1718151413161211103219UP
KINGSTANDARDEND
DN845671718151413161211103219UP
1/8" = 1'-0"SYMBOLS LEGEND:MARKDESCRIPTIONU.N.O.XXXXXXXXXXWXXX2UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEKEYNOTEROOM NUMBEREQUIPMENT TAGROOM NAMECEILING HEIGHT - ABOVE FIN. FLOORACCESSIBLE ROOM w/ MOBILITY FEATURES3188'- 8"X-000LOBBY3421R16SNK-04MAGNETIC DOOR HOLD OPEN TIED TO BUILDINGALARM SYSTEM- REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE (SHEET A-701) &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS- REFER TO FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS BY OTHERSINDICATES ROOM w/ COMMUNICATION FEATURES.-- REFER TO GUESTROOM ELECTRICAL PLANSFOR POWER AND SIGNALPLUMBING FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL. SEEPLUMBING FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGN GUIDEPROJECT MANUAL MASTER & PLUMBING DRAWINGSLIGHT FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL.- REFER TO LIGHT FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGNGUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.
FURNISHING REFERENCE NUMBER- REFER TO THE INTERIOR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONMANUAL.FINISH TAG- REFER TO THE INTERIOR FINISH INDEX WITHIN THEDESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER.BATHROOM ACCESSORY MARK NUMBER- REFER TO TOILET & BATH ACCESSORY MATRIX INTHE DESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTERSECTION 10800.DOOR-REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE........... SHT. A-701WINDOW-REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE........SHT. A-710WALL TYPE-REFER TO............................ SHT. A-840 / DET. 13REFERENCE NOTESA.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS FORREQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THIS PROJECT.B.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS "ELEVATOR"CHAPTER FOR ELEVATOR PLANNING REQUIREMENTSINCLUDING ELEVATOR TYPE, SIZE, QUANTITY,PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND FEATURES PER SPECIFICPROJECT SIZE AND LAYOUT.C. REFER TO A-600 SERIES SHEET FOR ENLARGED PUBLICSPACE PLANS AND DETAILS.D. REFER TO A-200 SERIES SHEETS FOR GUESTROOM PLANSAND DETAILS.E.REFER TO SHEETS G3 THRU G6 FOR FIRE RATEDASSEMBLIES, TACTILE & STAIRWAY SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLEMANEUVERING CLEARANCES , OCCUPANCY TYPES &OCCUPANT LOADS,F.REFER TO SHEET A-200 FOR TYPICAL DEVICEMOUNTING LOCATIONS.
GENERAL NOTESA. SIGNAGE SUPPLIER MUST SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVEINTERIOR GRAPHIC / SIGNAGE LAYOUT (INCLUDINGELEVATIONS), FULLY COORDINATED WITH ANYELECTRICAL, ARTWORK OR OTHER WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS,FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.KEYNOTES1.PROVIDE DOORS IN OPEN POSITION WITH THEELECTROMAGNETIC HOLD-OPEN TIED TOFIRE ALARM SYSTEM2.INDICATES ELECTRICAL MAIN SWITCHGEAR- REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS3.2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN CABINET- REFER TO...........................................DETAIL 17/ A-8414. TYPE 'K' FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)5. 2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)6.PLUMBED EYE WASH STATION-REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS7.RECESSED WALK OFF MAT WITH FRAME.- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-6168.PROVIDE 6" HIGH CONCRETE STEMWALL AROUND WATERHEATER ROOM- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-211
9.2x6 WALL FURRING AT CORRIDOR DOOR10.INDICATES CONCENTRIC VENTS FROM WATER HEATERSPER PLUMBING DRAWINGS11.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS12.INDICATES MAIN FIRE SPRINKLER RISER IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS13.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER STANDPIPE IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS14.INDICATES DOMESTIC WATER BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS15. PROVIDE 2-HOUR RATED ASSEMBLIES AT ELEVATORSHAFT, LAUNDRY CHUTE SHAFT, STAIRWAYS AND HVACDUCT SHAFTS16.ICE MAKER LOCATION INTERIOR PARTY WALLSEXTERIOR WALLS (2x6)ATTICBATT INSULATIONBATT INSULATIONR-21R-13- BATT INSULATION SHALL BE FIBERGLASS PAPER BACKED- RADIANT BARRIER NOT REQUIRED ON ATTIC SIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING- REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-711 FOR GLAZING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.ENERGY DATA:R-38ALL WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE INSULATED AS NOTED BELOW:FLOOR CEILINGSBATT INSULATION (FULL DEPTH OF FRAMING)R-30BATT INSULATION + R-23RIGID INSULATION S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_AC-003_Combined 3rd Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:40:13 PM 795
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL AC-004COMBINED 4TH FLOORCOORDINATION PLAN
22.134567
1313.114151616.2
1920
21222324262728 333538
121110 K.8K.9L.7N.2N.5Q.2
J.2J.4K.1L.5L.8
CBA.2
NN.1PQR.1
K.8K.9
S
N.1 M.3M.8
H.9J.9L.1M.2N.3PQ PQO
363729303132
1718
DEFGH
98 JKLM
R
25 34
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
34.1 S
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALL
O
A.1A1
M.9
CBA.2
N
DEFGHJKLM
A.1A
H.9
16.113.815.2
T T
15.9 Q.5
ELEV A2ELEV A18'-0" x 11'-6"8'-6" x 6'-9"10'-6" x 9'-0" 21'-6" x 8'-0"19'-0" x 7'-6"7'-6" x 16'-0"
8'-0" x 8'-0" 18'-0" x 21'-6"
15'-0" x 15'-0"LND.CHUTE
ELECT.11'-6" x 17'-6"
KINGSTANDARDI.T.ICELINENKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOMKINGSTANDARD
ONEBEDROOMKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOONEBEDROOMCONFERENCESUITE STAIR E2QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOELECTRICALSTAIR E1
ONEBEDROOMKINGSTANDARDONEBEDROOMACCESSIBLEKINGSTUDIOLINEN
KINGSTANDARDQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARD
KINGSTANDARDKINGSTANDARDCOMMONSKING ASTAIR E3COMMONSKING ACOMMONSKING A-ENDQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
QUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOQUEEN/QUEENSTUDIOKINGSTUDIO
ICE
STUDIOCOMMONSCOMMONSKING-B
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/QQ/QQ/QKINGKINGKING
Q/QKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQ/Q
Q/QKINGKINGKINGITEQUIP.REFRESHELEV.LOBBYKINGICE KINGKINGACCESSIBLEKING 2(TRANSFERSHOWER)Q/QCORNER 3 LINENSTAIR A2
ACCESSIBLEKING(TRANSFERSHOWER)Q/QCORNER 2STAIR A1
DN845671718151413161211103219
DN84567 1718151413161211103219
DN84567 1718151413161211103219 UP TOROOF
DN84567 1718151413161211103219
KINGSTANDARDEND
DN845671718151413161211103219UP TOROOF
1/8" = 1'-0"SYMBOLS LEGEND:MARKDESCRIPTIONU.N.O.XXXXXXXXXXWXXX2UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEKEYNOTEROOM NUMBEREQUIPMENT TAGROOM NAMECEILING HEIGHT - ABOVE FIN. FLOORACCESSIBLE ROOM w/ MOBILITY FEATURES3188'- 8"X-000LOBBY3421R16SNK-04MAGNETIC DOOR HOLD OPEN TIED TO BUILDINGALARM SYSTEM- REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE (SHEET A-701) &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS- REFER TO FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS BY OTHERSINDICATES ROOM w/ COMMUNICATION FEATURES.-- REFER TO GUESTROOM ELECTRICAL PLANSFOR POWER AND SIGNALPLUMBING FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL. SEEPLUMBING FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGN GUIDEPROJECT MANUAL MASTER & PLUMBING DRAWINGSLIGHT FIXTURE MARK NO. ,TYPICAL.- REFER TO LIGHT FIXTURE MATRIX IN DESIGNGUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER &ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.
FURNISHING REFERENCE NUMBER- REFER TO THE INTERIOR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONMANUAL.FINISH TAG- REFER TO THE INTERIOR FINISH INDEX WITHIN THEDESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTER.BATHROOM ACCESSORY MARK NUMBER- REFER TO TOILET & BATH ACCESSORY MATRIX INTHE DESIGN GUIDE PROJECT MANUAL MASTERSECTION 10800.DOOR-REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE........... SHT. A-701WINDOW-REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE........SHT. A-710WALL TYPE-REFER TO............................ SHT. A-840 / DET. 13REFERENCE NOTESA.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS FORREQUIREMENTSRELATED TO THIS PROJECT.B.REFER TO HOTEL BRAND DESIGN STANDARDS "ELEVATOR"CHAPTER FOR ELEVATOR PLANNING REQUIREMENTSINCLUDING ELEVATOR TYPE, SIZE, QUANTITY,PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND FEATURES PER SPECIFICPROJECT SIZE AND LAYOUT.C. REFER TO A-600 SERIES SHEET FOR ENLARGED PUBLICSPACE PLANS AND DETAILS.D. REFER TO A-200 SERIES SHEETS FOR GUESTROOM PLANSAND DETAILS.E.REFER TO SHEETS G3 THRU G6 FOR FIRE RATEDASSEMBLIES, TACTILE & STAIRWAY SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLEMANEUVERING CLEARANCES , OCCUPANCY TYPES &OCCUPANT LOADS,F.REFER TO SHEET A-200 FOR TYPICAL DEVICEMOUNTING LOCATIONS.
GENERAL NOTESA. SIGNAGE SUPPLIER MUST SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVEINTERIOR GRAPHIC / SIGNAGE LAYOUT (INCLUDINGELEVATIONS), FULLY COORDINATED WITH ANYELECTRICAL, ARTWORK OR OTHER WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS,FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.KEYNOTES1.PROVIDE DOORS IN OPEN POSITION WITH THEELECTROMAGNETIC HOLD-OPEN TIED TOFIRE ALARM SYSTEM2.INDICATES ELECTRICAL MAIN SWITCHGEAR- REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS3.2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN CABINET- REFER TO...........................................DETAIL 17/ A-8414. TYPE 'K' FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)5. 2A:10B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER (WALL MOUNTED)6.PLUMBED EYE WASH STATION-REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS7.RECESSED WALK OFF MAT WITH FRAME.- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-6168.PROVIDE 6" HIGH CONCRETE STEMWALL AROUND WATERHEATER ROOM- REFER TO .............................................DETAIL 1/A-211
9.2x6 WALL FURRING AT CORRIDOR DOOR10.INDICATES CONCENTRIC VENTS FROM WATER HEATERSPER PLUMBING DRAWINGS11.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS12.INDICATES MAIN FIRE SPRINKLER RISER IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS13.INDICATES FIRE SPRINKLER STANDPIPE IN STAIRWELL- REFER TO FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS (BY OTHERS)FOR DETAILED REQUIREMENTS14.INDICATES DOMESTIC WATER BOOSTER PUMP- REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS15. PROVIDE 2-HOUR RATED ASSEMBLIES AT ELEVATORSHAFT, LAUNDRY CHUTE SHAFT, STAIRWAYS AND HVACDUCT SHAFTS16.ICE MAKER LOCATION INTERIOR PARTY WALLSEXTERIOR WALLS (2x6)ATTICBATT INSULATIONBATT INSULATIONR-21R-13- BATT INSULATION SHALL BE FIBERGLASS PAPER BACKED- RADIANT BARRIER NOT REQUIRED ON ATTIC SIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING- REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-711 FOR GLAZING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.ENERGY DATA:R-38ALL WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE INSULATED AS NOTED BELOW:FLOOR CEILINGSBATT INSULATION (FULL DEPTH OF FRAMING)R-30BATT INSULATION + R-23RIGID INSULATION S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_AC-004_Combined 4th Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:41:55 PM 796
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL 1314151619121110CB 1718
DEFG
98 CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALLA1234567
ICEDISPENSER
3257(&2&+Ê5(
EVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVREVR
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGSTAIRS #1ELEV #2ELEV #1KINGELEVATORLOBBY ELECT.LINEN /STOR.JAN.MFIREPUMPSTAIRS #2CL.MEETINGROOMENTRYVESTIBULEWORKROOMSALESOFFICEFRONTDESKNETWORKZONELOUNGE/DININGBUFFETCARTMARKETFOODPREP.GENERALMANAGERCL.
MECH.ELEV.EQUIP.MEN'SWOMEN'SENGINEERR.R.LINEN STOR.POOLEQUIP.EMPLOYEEBREAKROOMLAUNDRYFITNESSCENTERMARKETSTORLUGGAGECORRIDORKING(ACC ROLL-IN)
MKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKING
EVRVAN
F.D.
F.D.
F.D.
1ST FLOORCOORDINATION PLANP-211
1ST FLOOR COORDINATION PLANSCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"
Xref S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\XREF\NOTES\2304_X-Guestroom Type Schedule.dwg S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\CD\2304_A-211_1st Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 3:08:08 PM 797
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL 2ND FLOORCOORDINATION PLANP-221
KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKING-WKINGKINGL-WKING(ACC TUB)Q / Q-WQ / QQ / QQ / QSTAIRS #1Q / Q(ACC. TUB)KINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONG ICEELEV #2ELEV #1
LINENKING KING
LINEN /STOR.STAIRS #2Q / Q(ACC. TUB)KING(ACC TUB)ELECT.
GUESTLAUNDRYELEVATORLOBBY
1314151619121110CB 1718
DEFG
98 CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALLA1234567
CORRIDORCORRIDOR
I.T.UPDN
845671727262524231514131628
12111032192221
UPDN
845671727262524231514131628
12111032192221
2ND FLOOR COORDINATION PLANSCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"
S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\CD\2304_A-221_2nd Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 3:06:11 PM 798
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
14.1AGENERAL TEXTMTEXT AT 5" TALLAKEYNOTE TAGS+10'-0"TOP / WALLCA4.7CA4.7NO.DATE:ISSUE:10.07.16DRC SUBMITTAL12.01.16PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL02.20.17PC CORRECTION103.13.17JLR REVIEW CORRECTIONS2 SHEET NO.SCALE: TEXT SIZE 5"A0.0SHEET TITLETEXT SIZE - 10"SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL 3RD FLOORCOORDINATION PLANP-231
ELEV #2ELEV #1#328#327Q / Q WIDEQ / Q WIDESTORAGE &LINENKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKING-WKINGKINGL-WKING(ACC TUB)Q / Q-WQ / QQ / Q Q / QSTAIRS #1KINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONG
ICEKINGKING
LINEN /STOR.STAIRS #3KING(ACC TUB)ELECT.
ELEVATORLOBBYCORRIDORCORRIDOR
1314151619 121110 CB1718
DEFG
98 CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALLA1234567
DN845671718151413161211103219UP DN84567 1718151413161211103219UP 3RD FLOOR COORDINATION PLANSCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"
S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\CD\2304_A-231_3rd Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 3:04:28 PM 799
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL 4TH FLOORCOORDINATION PLANSA-241
Q / Q WIDEQ / Q WIDESTORAGE& LINENQ / Q WIDEQ / Q WIDEKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKING-WKINGKINGL-WQ / QQ / Q Q / QSTAIRS #1KINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONGKINGLONG
ICEKING KING
LINEN /STOR.STAIRS #4ELECT.
ELEVATORLOBBYCORRIDORCORRIDORQ / Q WIDE
1314151619121110CB 1718
DEFG
98 CENTERLINE OF2Hr FIREWALLA1234567
4TH FLOOR COORDINATION PLANSCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"
S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\CD\2304_A-241_4th Floor Coordination Plan.dwg, 5/22/2024 3:02:03 PM 800
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL A-301EXTERIORELEVATIONS3//32" = 1'-0"
H O T E L S+0'-0"FIN. SLAB
+45'-2 1/4"DBL TOP PLATE +36-0 1/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+25'-7 1/2"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+15'-2 3/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR14'-0"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"PLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHT +51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET8'-5 1/4"+59'-7 1/2"T.O. ROOF6'-0"+51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET 1'-0"
1'-0"
W xyz lounge
H O T E L S+59'-6"T.O. PORTAL+55'-2"T.O. PARAPET+50'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET+51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET+59'-7 1/2"T.O. PARAPET +15'-3"
ELEMENTALOFT+52'-7 1/4"T.O. PARAPET
1'-7"
EAST ELEVATION (PEACH AVE.)SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION (HERNDON AVE.) WEST ENDSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"
MATCHLINE
MATCHLINE
21 WEST ELEVATION4NORTH ELEVATION1
NORTH ELEVATION2 SOUTH ELEVATION3
NORTH ELEVATION (HERNDON AVE.) EAST ENDSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"1 +0'-0"FIN. SLAB
+45'-2 1/4"DBL TOP PLATE +36-0 1/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+25'-7 1/2"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+15'-2 3/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR14'-0"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"PLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHT +51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET6'-0"
1'-0"
1'-0"
1'-7"
HORIZ. ACCENTLIGHTING (TYP.)HORIZ. ACCENTLIGHTING (TYP.)
EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS LEGEND (ALOFT BRAND)MARKDESCRIPTION NOTE: REFER TO EXTERIOR FINISH INDEX - GEN. 4.0 BY ALOFT EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 2EEF-001EEF-002GLAZING 2WGL-002LIGHT STRIP ALJ-03LIGHT STRIP ALJ-04EIFS COLOR 3EEF-003GLAZING 3WGL-003EIFS COLOR 4EEF-004EIFS COLOR 5EEF-005EXTERIOR WALL PANELEWP-003EWP-004EXTERIOR WALL PANEL (Aluminum Composite Panel) CEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 085.008.085CF WHITECEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 063.002.093CF DARK GRAYCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX M049.040.256 BLUE METALLIC applied over NAC 085.008.085CFCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX NAC M048.028.342 PINK applied over NAC 085.008.085FCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX M049.040.256 BLUE METALLIC applied over NAC 085.008.085CF- LOCATION: (Front Entry / Pool Entry wood wall panel)- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: 18" x 10'-0" LONG PANELS- COLOR: CEDAR (EF762)- LOCATION: (Roof trim at Porte Cochere)- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: ILLUMINATIONS SERIES- PATTERN: 18" x 6'-0" LONG PANELS- COLOR: BGY GRAY (S-04690) - LOCATION: (Exterior Wall Mounted Striplight)- MFG: Signify / Color Kinetics- PRODUCT: Accent MX Powercore gen 3, RGB- MODEL: 123-000181-01- LOCATION: (Exterior Wall Mounted Striplight)- MFG: Signify / Color Kinetics- PRODUCT: Accent MX Powercore gen 3, RGB- MODEL: 123-000181-01 - LOCATION: (within 'EEF-002' at Exterior Wall)- MFG: OLDCASTLE- PRODUCT: SPANDREL GLAZING 'MILKY WHITE'- LOCATION: Exterior at 'wxyz' bar area- MFG: VIRACON- PRODUCT: VIRASPAN 'WARM GRAY' #V933MARKDESCRIPTIONEXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS LEGEND (ELEMENT BRAND)MARKDESCRIPTION NOTE: REFER TO EXTERIOR FINISH INDEX - GEN. 2.5 BY ELEMENT
MARKDESCRIPTIONLIGHT COLORED EIFSDARK COLORED EIFS
BUILDING PANEL @ PORTAL
EEF-001EEF-002
EWP-002
WOOD LOOK PANEL - LIGHTGREEN COLOR EIFS @UNDERSIDE OF PORTALEWP-003BEEF-003BUILDING PANELEWP-001 WOOD LOOK PANEL - DARKEWP-003AALUMINUM LOUVEREAL-001CEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'AQUASOL SAND FINE (hydrophobic)'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 082.008.080CF- PROVIDE WITH 12" O.C. VERTICAL JOINTSCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'AQUASOL SAND FINE (hydrophobic)'- COLOR: PAREX 'DARK GRAY'- PROVIDE WITH 12" O.C. VERTICAL JOINTSCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND FINE'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 071.015.111CF- FIBER CEMENT WALL PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: 5/8" THK. ILLUMINATION SERIES- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: GRAY- FIBER CEMENT WALL PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: ILLUMINATION SERIES- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: SILVER - FIBER CEMNET WOOD LOOK PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: BARK- FIBER CEMENT WOOD LOOK PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: CEDAR- HVAC LOUVER BY PTAC UNIT MANUFACTURER- COLOR: MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_A-301_Exterior Elevations.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:43:52 PM 801
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2216
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625ELEMENT/ALOFTXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL11.16.2023C.U.P. RE-SUBMITTAL A-302EXTERIORELEVATIONS3//32" = 1'-0"
+0'-0"FIN. SLAB
+45'-2 1/4"DBL TOP PLATE +36-0 1/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+25'-7 1/2"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+15'-2 3/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR14'-0"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"PLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHT +51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET5'-0"ELEMENTALOFT
SHOWER
WEST ELEVATIONSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ENDSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"
MATCHLINE
MATCHLINE
WEST ELEVATION4NORTH ELEVATION1
NORTH ELEVATION2 SOUTH ELEVATION3
4 3
SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ENDSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"3
+0'-0"FIN. SLAB
+45'-2 1/4"DBL TOP PLATE +36-0 1/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+25'-7 1/2"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR+15'-2 3/4"T.O. PLYWOODSUBFLOOR14'-0"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"1'-2 3/4"9'-2"PLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHTPLATE HEIGHT +51'-2 1/4"T.O. PARAPET5'-0"ELEMENTALOFT
HORIZ. ACCENTLIGHTING (TYP.)
EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS LEGEND (ALOFT BRAND)MARKDESCRIPTION NOTE: REFER TO EXTERIOR FINISH INDEX - GEN. 4.0 BY ALOFT EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 2EEF-001EEF-002GLAZING 2WGL-002LIGHT STRIP ALJ-03LIGHT STRIP ALJ-04EIFS COLOR 3EEF-003GLAZING 3WGL-003EIFS COLOR 4EEF-004EIFS COLOR 5EEF-005EXTERIOR WALL PANELEWP-003EWP-004EXTERIOR WALL PANEL (Aluminum Composite Panel) CEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 085.008.085CF WHITECEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 063.002.093CF DARK GRAYCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX M049.040.256 BLUE METALLIC applied over NAC 085.008.085CFCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX NAC M048.028.342 PINK applied over NAC 085.008.085FCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND SMOOTH w/METALLIC COATING'- COLOR: PAREX M049.040.256 BLUE METALLIC applied over NAC 085.008.085CF- LOCATION: (Front Entry / Pool Entry wood wall panel)- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: 18" x 10'-0" LONG PANELS- COLOR: CEDAR (EF762)- LOCATION: (Roof trim at Porte Cochere)- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: ILLUMINATIONS SERIES- PATTERN: 18" x 6'-0" LONG PANELS- COLOR: BGY GRAY (S-04690) - LOCATION: (Exterior Wall Mounted Striplight)- MFG: Signify / Color Kinetics- PRODUCT: Accent MX Powercore gen 3, RGB- MODEL: 123-000181-01- LOCATION: (Exterior Wall Mounted Striplight)- MFG: Signify / Color Kinetics- PRODUCT: Accent MX Powercore gen 3, RGB- MODEL: 123-000181-01 - LOCATION: (within 'EEF-002' at Exterior Wall)- MFG: OLDCASTLE- PRODUCT: SPANDREL GLAZING 'MILKY WHITE'- LOCATION: Exterior at 'wxyz' bar area- MFG: VIRACON- PRODUCT: VIRASPAN 'WARM GRAY' #V933MARKDESCRIPTIONEXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS LEGEND (ELEMENT BRAND)MARKDESCRIPTION NOTE: REFER TO EXTERIOR FINISH INDEX - GEN. 2.5 BY ELEMENT
MARKDESCRIPTIONLIGHT COLORED EIFSDARK COLORED EIFS
BUILDING PANEL @ PORTAL
EEF-001EEF-002
EWP-002
WOOD LOOK PANEL - LIGHTGREEN COLOR EIFS @UNDERSIDE OF PORTALEWP-003BEEF-003BUILDING PANELEWP-001 WOOD LOOK PANEL - DARKEWP-003AALUMINUM LOUVEREAL-001CEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'AQUASOL SAND FINE (hydrophobic)'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 082.008.080CF- PROVIDE WITH 12" O.C. VERTICAL JOINTSCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'AQUASOL SAND FINE (hydrophobic)'- COLOR: PAREX 'DARK GRAY'- PROVIDE WITH 12" O.C. VERTICAL JOINTSCEMENT PLASTER 1 (ACRYLIC FINISH)- TEXTURE TO MATCH'PAREX SAND FINE'- COLOR: PAREX #NAC 071.015.111CF- FIBER CEMENT WALL PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: 5/8" THK. ILLUMINATION SERIES- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: GRAY- FIBER CEMENT WALL PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: ILLUMINATION SERIES- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: SILVER - FIBER CEMNET WOOD LOOK PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: BARK- FIBER CEMENT WOOD LOOK PANELS- MFG: NICHIHA- PRODUCT: VINTAGE WOOD- PATTERN: PER PLAN- COLOR: CEDAR- HVAC LOUVER BY PTAC UNIT MANUFACTURER- COLOR: MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR S:\2022 PROJECTS\2216 - THANDI - DUAL BRAND\AutoCAD\CD\2216_A-302_Exterior Elevations.dwg, 5/22/2024 2:45:46 PM 802
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL. 0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.
SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
+57'-6"T.O. PARAPET +49'-0"T.O. PARAPET+51'-6"T.O. PARAPET+53'-0"T.O. PARAPET EEF-003EEF-003EEF-001EEF-003
0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL. 0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.
NORTH ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
+49'-0"T.O. PARAPET+53'-0"T.O. PARAPET+51'-6"T.O. PARAPET +57'-6"T.O. PARAPET SHEET NO.PROJECT NO.2304
SHEET TITLE:SCALE:
NO.DATE:ISSUE:
415 Park Creek DriveClovis, Ca 93611559 . 435 . 3303www.rldavidson.com
10.14.2022INITIAL DESIGN
2024, r.l. davidson, inc.no part of this drawing may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, withoutwritten permission of r.l. davidson, inc.all rights reserved.FOR:AXIS HOTEL GROUPATTN: TONY THANDI4692 E. Lincoln Ave.Fowler, CA 93625SPRINGHILL SUITESXXXX HERNDON AVE.(SWC HERNDON & PEACH)CLOVIS, CA04.18.2023C.U.P. SUBMITTAL Clearance 14'-0"0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL. 0'-0"FIN. SLAB.+15'-2 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+14'-0"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+10'-4 3/4"T.O. SUB-FLR.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.+9'-2"DBL. TOP PL.
EAST ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" +57'-6"T.O. PARAPET+51'-6"T.O. PARAPET+57'-6"T.O. PARAPET+49'-0"T.O. PARAPET
PORTE COCHERE
+53'-0 +/-T.O. PARAPET+49'-0"T.O. PARAPET+53'-0"T.O. PARAPET SPRINGHILL SUITESEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA-301
EIFS2EIFS1EIFS5MANUFACTUREDSTONE MASONRYPATIO SCREEN WALLRAILING SYSTEM EEF-001EEF-002EEF-005EDS-001EFM-003ECA-002PATIO CANOPYTRELLIS SYSTEM EIFS3EEF-003
PATIO RAILINGSYSTEMEFM-001DECORATIVE PAVINGEDP-002DECORATIVE PAVINGEDP-001 EEF-001EEF-001EEF-002EEF-001EEF-001EEF-001
EEF-001EEF-001EEF-001EEF-002EEF-001
EEF-003 EEF-001
EEF-003
EEF-001EEF-002EEF-001 EEF-001EEF-001EEF-002
EEF-002EEF-003
EEF-005EEF-002EEF-003
EEF-003EEF-003EDS-001EFM-003EFM-001EDS-001EFM-003
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
EDS-001
S:\2023 PROJECTS\2304 - THANDI - SPRINGHILL CLOVIS\AutoCad\CD\2304_A-301_Elevations.dwg, 5/22/2024 3:08:58 PM 803
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services Department
DATE: June 16, 2025
SUBJECT: Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider Approval - Res. 25 -___, A Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report for Assessment District 95- 1, Blackhorse Estates , Confirming the Assessments for the 2025 -26 Fiscal Year.
Staff: Jomar Rushdan, Management Analyst
Recommendation: Approve
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 25-___
2. Vicinity Map
3. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Engineer’s Report
RECOMMENDATION
1. Conduct a Public Hearing regarding the proposed assessment increase in the maximum assessment for Benefit Area I (Renaissance neighborhood) beginning with Fiscal Year 2025- 26 for the City of Clovis Benefit Assessment District 95-1, Blackhorse Estates.
2. Conduct a Public Hearing regarding the proposed maximum assessment for Benefit Area II (Country View neighborhood) beginning with Fiscal Year 2025-26 for the City of Clovis Benefit Assessment District 95-1, Blackhorse Estates.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On May 1, 1995, the City Council of the City of Clovis approved Resolution No. 95 -42 forming the Benefit Assessment District 95 -1 (the “District”) within Tract 4299A comprised of the Blackhorse Estates development. Blackhorse Estates is divided into two areas, Area I has 45 homes and is known as the Renaissance neighborhood and Area II has 81 homes and is known as the Country View neighborhood, for a total of 126 homes. Each area is a gated c ommunity where each home is assessed an annual amount to pay for maintenance of the street and landscaping facilities, including sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median island landscaping, drainage inlets and streetlights benefitting the homes within the District.
804
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
On June 1 7, 2024, City Council approved the latest annual Engineer’s Report for the District.
Since that time, costs continue to rise and the current assessments for Area I do not provide funding adequate to provide for routine maintenance. The Area I Owners and Council approved staff’s recommendation to increase rates by $ 55 per year, per home in Area I to keep up with basic area maintenance as well as build the fund reserve for future capital maintenance projects.
This increase is within the maximum 5% allowable increase in assessments allowed per the Proposition 218 vote approved on June 17, 2024. Area II has a sufficient cash flow currently and no increase is proposed for their annual assessments. In addition, staff is requesting the other actions necessary for the annual levy and collection of assessments.
Staff also has been in contact with the owners of both Area I and II to inform them of the Council Meeting taking place and the $55 increase being proposed.
BACKGROUND
The District provides maintenance services for a gated community located at the southea st corner of Alluvial and Minnewawa Avenues and was created under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. The maintenance services provided include sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, valley gutters, entrance control gates, median islands and landscaping, drainage inlets and streetlights within the District. The maintenance activities are managed through a contract with Regency Property Management, a real estate management firm.
The purpose of the District is to provide all the necessary street maintenance activities within the tract including gated entries and exits. The streets and gate systems are privately owned. All maintenance within the District is performed on a contractual basis, utilizing private contractors, and funded by the District assessments. All administrative coordination is performed by Regency Property Management who is contracted by the City on behalf of the District and funded from the assessments.
History
The District was formed in 1995 to provide a funding source fo r the maintenance of the private streets within the subdivision as a result of the developers, and some prospective property owners within the subdivision, desire to have security gates.
The first phase of the subdivision (Tract 4299) was originally recor ded as a conventional subdivision with public streets and no gates at the entrances and exits. Subsequent to the recording of that map, the developer decided that he wanted the community to be gated and requested the City’s assistance in finding a way to p rovide security gates at the entrances and exits. In order for any subdivision or any other development to be gated, the streets or areas behind the gates needed to be privately owned. With no HOA in place and no desire to form an HOA for the subdivision, the City provided a way to accommodate the developer’s request as follows:
Streets within the subdivision were abandoned.
Subdivision was remapped (Tract 4299A), providing for ownership of the roads to the centerline of the streets by the individual lot owners. Public utility easements were retained for the City sewer and water systems. 805
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
An irrevocable offer of dedication of the streets was provided to the City so that the City could reclaim the street area should that become necessary. Assessment District 95-1 was formed to cover maintenance of the streets, gates, etc.
Differences between an Assessment District and a HOA
Some of the most pertinent differences between an Assessment District and a HOA involve the management of the funds. With this District, the owners provide the assessments through their property taxes and the City manages how the funds are spent. It is important to note that public funds cannot be used for the District and that day-to-day decisions for the spending of the funds lies with the City. Any increase in the assessments is required to be put to a vote of the owners according to Prop 218. In contrast, a HOA defines these roles through their Bylaws. California Civil Code provides a HOA with the ability to increase assessments by up to 20% annually without a vote of their membership. As a comparison, the District’s rates from creation to date have averaged an annual increase of approximately 5% in both Area I and Area II.
Maintenance
The intent of the maintenance district is to provide all the necessary street maintenance activities in the tract. Since the streets are private, no public funds may be expended on maintenance activities and no City crews may be utilized for street maintenance activities. All maintenance within the district is to be performed on a contractual basis, utilizing private contractors, and funded by district assessments. All administrative coordination is to be performed by a private management firm contracted by the City on behalf of the district and funded from the assessments. The management firm is to be responsible for the street maintenance activities including the following:
Repair of damaged concrete facilities such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, and valley gutters.
Maintenance of entry gates including repa ir or replacement of damaged gates, repair of opening mechanisms, repair of entry communication facilities, operational maintenance (painting, lubrication, etc.).
Periodic street sweeping.
Landscape maintenance of entry features and entry medians. Pavement maintenance, including pothole patching and any necessary pavement striping or stenciling.
Pavement preventative maintenance including seal coats and overlays. Coordination and resolution of complaints from tract residents that deal with street conditions such as cleaning, surface drainage, etc.
Perpetual City Responsibilities
As originally envisioned, the City was responsible for the annual administration of the District, and it was anticipated that these duties would be limited to the following:
Noticing of tract residents of the annual assessment hearing. Convening an annual public hearing to consider adjustment to the district assessments. Collecting the assessments and minimal financial overview of expenditures to assure fiduciary responsibility (general accounting to be provided by district management firm hired by the City on behalf of the district).
806
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Administrative review of the annual assessment report. Forwarding occasional service requests received by the City to the management company for resolution.
Current Status
When the original district was formed, the intent for raising revenue was to do so as needed following a City Council public hearing. However, subsequent to formation, Proposition 218 was voted into law requiring a property owner election in order to increase assessments. Since that time, the ability to increase revenue to the levels needed to properly take care of needed maintenance has been limited. As a result, preventative maintenance activities were put off due to insufficient funding. With the age of the streets within both benefit areas being 25+ years with no preventative maintenance performed and the fund balances finally at levels to fund the slurry seal projects, the slurry seals were completed in 2022.
Area I
The last increase to the Area I assessments was 2024. In the Proposition 218, that was voted for by the property owners of Area I and approved by City Council on June 17, 2024, allowed for an increase in assessments up to 5% per year, without the need of Proposition 218. The proposed increase would be subject to the Engineer’s Report that will consider the needs of Area I, costs, and the current budget. Since that time, the cost for routine maintenance has risen.
With these increased costs and the slurry seal project currently paid back to the City, which also cost more than anticipated, the fund s are not prepared for future expenses and future Capital Improvement Projects without implementation of the previously approved increase. The budget proposed for 2025-26 remains under a desirable amount for future expenses and includes the basic routine maintenance plus the following:
Street Maintenance in 10 -15 years to keep the neighborhood streets in good condition, provide for safe ingress and egress, as wel l as maintaining neighborhood aesthetics.
Accumulating funds for this project now is expected to reduce future assessment rate increases.
In order to achieve this budget, staff recommend ed the annual assessment increase of $55.00 per home per year, the a nnual revenues will be sufficient to continue to perform the needed maintenance and build a reserve for future maintenance activities.
Area II
The last increase to the Area II assessments was 2 years ago. This increase included a provision for future street preventative maintenance, and the fund remains in good shape this year. The current level of assessments is adequate to cover the costs of routine maintenance, provide for a fund reserve, and accumulate funds for future capital projects despite the increases in costs.
The budget for Area II will need to be monitored and reevaluated each year to ensure adequate funding levels are maintained. It is anticipated to propose Proposition 218 in the next fiscal year, similar to Area I approval in 2024.
807
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City as long as the District remains solvent.
For Area II, the current level of assessments is adequate to cover the costs of routine maintenance, provide for a fund reserve, and accumulate funds for future capital projects despite the increases in costs. The budget for Area II will need to be monitored and reev aluated each year to ensure adequate funding levels are maintained.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The fund balance for Area I will need to increase the assessment by the approved annual maximum increase to have a sustainable budget and to provide the cash flo w necessary for routine maintenance and future capital projects. Area II will have a positive cash flow for the upcoming fiscal year.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
If the assessment rate s are approved for Area s I and II , the City will work with the District consultant to get the attached Engineer’s Report signed and recorded with the County Tax Auditor to levy the increased Benefit Assessment District 95-1 assessments for F iscal Year 2025-26.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
Prepared by: Ruben Amavizca, Engineer II
Reviewed by: City Manager AH
808
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-__
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS
DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER PROTEST BALLOTING
PROCEEDINGS AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 95-1, BLACKHORSE ESTATES, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
WHEREAS, on May 1, 1995, the City Council approved Resolution 95 -42 creating Assessment District 95-1 in Tract 4299A; and
WHEREAS, an Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, has been prepared evaluating the costs of maintenance in Benefit Assessment District 95-1 for the 2025- 2026 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, Benefit Area I of Benefit Assessment District 95-1 consists of the Renaissance neighborhood which accesses Minnewawa Avenue as shown on Attachment 2; and
WHEREAS, Benefit Area II of Benefit Assessment District 95 -1 consists of the Country View neighborhood which accesses Alluvial Avenue as shown on Attachment 2; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report sets forth the proposed 2025-2026 fiscal year assessments for each benefit area within Benefit Assessment District 95-1; and
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed and concurs with the Engineer's Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Clovis as follows:
1. The recitals above are true and made a substantive part of this resolution; and
2. The Engineer's Report, in the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby accepted and approved; and
3. City staff is hereby directed to provide the County Auditor with the assessments to be collected on behalf of Benefit Assessment District 95 -1 for F iscal Year 2025-26.
* * * * *
809
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on June 16, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DATED:
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
810
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Benefit Assessment Area 1
Benefit Assessment Area 2
Alluvial Ave
N M
innewawa Ave
Athens Ave
Oak Ave
N Villa Ave
N Dartm
outh Ave
Park Creek Dr
Minarets Ave
W Alluvial Ave
Chennault Ave
N O
xford Ave
N De W
itt Ave
Bedford Ave
N Harvard Ave
N Cherry Ln
W Athens Ave
Birch Ave
W Bedford Ave
W Decatur Ave
N Perry Ave
N Fairfax Ave
Spruce Ave
N De W
itt Ave
N Harvard Ave
N De W
itt Ave
N Harvard Ave
N Cherry Ln
Park Creek Dr
N Minnewawa Ave
Bedford Ave
N O
xford Ave
N Harvard Ave
Bedford Ave
Athens Ave
Park Creek Dr
N Cherry Ln
Birch Ave
Copyright nearmap 2015
O
1 " = 300 ' 5/28/2020
Assessment District 95-1
Attachment 3
ATTACHEMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 1
5/01/2023
Attachment 2
Benefit Assessment Area I
Benefit Assessment Area II 811
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
City of Clovis
BenefitÊAssessmentÊDistrictÊNo.Ê95-1
FiscalÊYearÊ2025-26
FinalÊEngineer’sÊReport
June 16, 2025
Attachment 3
812
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 TABLE OF CONTENTS
-i-
Page No.
Agency Directory ........................................................................................ ii
Certificates................................................................................................. iii
SECTION I Introduction ..........................................................................1
SECTION II Engineer’s Report .................................................................3
Part A - Plans and Specifications .....................................................5
Part B - Estimate of Cost .................................................................6 Table 1 – Cost Estimate Benefit Area I (Renaissance) ........7 Table 2 – Cost Estimate Benefit Area II (Country View) ......8
Part C - Assessment District Diagram..............................................9
Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment ......................... 11
Part E - Property List and Assessment Roll ...................................14
Appendix A - Detailed Statement of Costs for Benefit Area I (Renaissance)
Appendix B - Detailed Statement of Costs for Benefit Area II (Country View)
Appendix C - Assessment Roll
813
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 AGENCY DIRECTORY
-ii-
CITY OF CLOVIS
AGENCY DIRECTORY
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
City Council Members
Vong Mouanoutoua
Mayor
Diane Pearce Lynne Ashbeckl
Mayor Pro-Tem Councilmember
Matt Basgall Drew Bessinger
Councilmember Councilmember
City Staff Members
Andrew Haussler
City Manager
Scott Cross Briana Parra
City Attorney City Clerk
Jay Schengel Thad Avery
Finance Director City Engineer
Sean Smith
Supervising Civil Engineer
Francisco & Associates
Assessment Engineer
814
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 CERTIFICATES
-iii-
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF CLOVIS
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE CITY’S
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates , respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer's Report as directed by the Clovis City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution and pursuant to the Charter and Municipal Code of the City of Clovis. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.
Dated: __ May 12, 2025 By:
Ed Espinoza, P.E.
RCE # 40688
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed with me on the ________day of ____________, 2025.
Briana Parra, City Clerk
City of Clovis
Fresno County, California
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the Council of the City of Clovis, Fresno County, California, on the ________ day of ____________, 2025, by adoption of Resolution No. _________.
Briana Parra, City Clerk
City of Clovis
Fresno County, California
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram, thereto attached, was filed in my office in the County of Fresno, on the ________ day of ____________, 2025.
Oscar J. Garcia, CPA, Auditor
Fresno County, California
By:
815
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2025-26 INTRODUCTION
-1-
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF CLOVIS
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE CITY’S
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Background Information
To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of specific improvements benefitting properties within the boundaries of the Benefit Assessment District No. 95 -1 (“District”), the City Council, through the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (“1982 Act”), previously approved the formation of the District which includes two (2) benefit areas as described in this Engineer’s Report (“Report”).
Benefit Area I is comprised of the Renaissance development and Benefit Area II is comprised of the Country View development. Street and landscaping i mprovements, which may be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District , include, but are not limited to:
Sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage inlets, paved sections, valley gutters, four entrance control gates and landscaping located at the Birch Avenue, Chennault Avenue, Oxford Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue entrances, and streetlights located within the boundaries of the District.
As part of their development conditions , the Developer for the District was required to construct improvements which benefit parcels within the District . However, the ongoing operation, maintenance, servicing and capital replacement of these improvements are financed through the levy of assessments on parcels within the District who directly benefit from those improvements.
Current Annual Administration
This Report includes the following for the ensuing fiscal year : (1) a general description of the improvements to be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget to construct, operate, maintain and service the improvements, (3) the method used to distribute the costs to the benefiting property owners within the District, (4) a diagram of the District and associated benefit areas, and (5) listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.
The City of Clovis will hold a Public Hearing on June 1 6, 20 25, regarding the Fiscal Year 2025-26 annual levy and collection of assessments for all benefit areas within the District. At the Public Hearing all property owners and interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council 816
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION I
Fiscal Year 2025-26 INTRODUCTION
-2-
may adopt a resolution confirming the Fiscal Year 20 25-26 levy and collection of assessments for all benefit areas as originally proposed or as modified.
Payment of the annual District assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this Report.
817
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
-3-
SECTION II
ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
SECTION 54703 THROUGH 54720
OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California) and in connection with the proceedings for:
CITY OF CLOVIS
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1
Herein after referred to as the “District", I, Ed Espinoza, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows:
PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements to be financed by the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovi s and are incorporated herein by reference.
PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the co st of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith.
PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates by reference a diagr am of the District showing the boundaries of any benefit areas within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on t he maps of the Fresno County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference and made part of this Report.
PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This part contains the method of apporti onment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received.
818
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 ENGINEER'S REPORT
-4-
PART E: PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a list of the Fresno County Assessor’s parcel numbers, and the amount to be assessed upon the benefited lands within the District. The Assessment Roll is filed in the Office of the Clovis City Clerk and is incorporated in this Report by reference. The list is keyed to the records of the Fresno County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference.
819
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART A
-5-
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The improvements, which have been constructed, and those which may be subsequently constructed, to be oper ated, maintained, and serviced under the District are generally described as follows:
Street and landscaping improvements consisting of, but not limited to , sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage inlets, paved sections, valley gutters, four entrance control gates and landscaping located at the Birch Avenue, Chennault Avenue, Oxford Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue entrances, and streetlights located within the boundaries of the District.
820
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
-6-
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
The 1982 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for the District. The 1982 Act provides that the total cost for the construction, operation, maintenance , and servicing of the street and landscaping improvements can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the District can also be included.
Revenues collected from the assessments within each benefit area shall be used only for the expenditures associated with each benefit area as authorized under the 198 2 Act. Any balance remaining at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.
Tables 1 and 2 below provide a summary of the total F iscal Year 2025-26 estimated revenues and expenditures for each benefit area.
For a detailed breakdown on the revenues and expenditures for each benefit area within the District please refer to Appendix "A" and Appendix "B" in this report.
821
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
-7-
TABLE NO. 1: BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Projected Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2025: $33,652 Revenue
Annual Assessments $48,375
Total Es timated Revenue for Fis cal Year 2025-26: $82,027 Annual Expenditures (1)
Administrative Expenses (Office Supplies, Postage, etc.) General Maintenance (Painting, Structure & Electrical Repairs, Backflow Testing, etc.) T
elephone Cost
Electronic Gate Maintenance/Repair
Street Sweeping
Landscape Maintenance & Irrigation Repairs
Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights
Water Service
City Administration Costs
County Collection Fees
District Administrator
Assessment Engineering
Insurance
Annual Expenditures Subtotal:
Capital Improvement Projects
Gate Operator Replacement
Firebox Replacement Back Gate
Capital Improvement Projects Subtotal:
Total Es timated Expens es for Fis cal Year 2025-26: ($51,398) Estimated Fiscal Year 2025-26 Reserve Collection: ($3,023) Projected Ending Balance as of June 30, 2026: $30,629
Reserve Detail as of June 30, 2026
Recommended Operating Reserves(2) $17,779
Available Operating Reserves $17,779
Available Capital Reserves(3) $12,850
As s es s ment Rate (45 Parcels ) $1,075.00
Notes:
(1) See Appendix "A" for a detailed description of expenses. (2) Operating reserves are needed because the City does not receive the assessment revenue from the C
ounty until halfway through the fiscal year. Therefore, it is recommended the City have an operating reserve to fund 6 months of the estimated annual expenditures anticipated to be incurred from July 1 through December 31 of each fiscal year.
(3) Capital reserve funds will be used for Capital Improvement Projects or to replace existing improvements once they have reached the end of their useful life.
BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE)
($9,500)
($700)
($2,100)
($1,200)
($1,000)
($700)
($10,300)
($2,900)
($2,300)
($2,000)
($8)
($1,650)
($1,200)
($35,558)
($15,840)
($740)
($15,100)
822
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
-8-
Projected Beginning Balance as of July 1, 2025: $41,790 Revenue
Annual Assessments $47,790
Total Es timated Revenue for Fis cal Year 2025-26: $89,580 Annual Expenditures (1)
Administrative Expenses (Office Supplies, Postage, etc.) General Maintenance (Painting, Structure & Electrical Repairs, Backflow Testing, etc.) Telephone Cost
Electronic Gate Maintenance/Repair
Street Sweeping
Landscape Maintenance & Irrigation Repairs
Electrical Power for Gate and Streetlights
Water Service
City Administration Costs
County Collection Fees
District Administrator
Assessment Engineering
Insurance
Annual Expenditures Subtotal:
Capital Improvement Projects
Gate Callbox Upgrade
Tree Trimming
Capital Improvement Projects Subtotal:
Total Es timated Expens es for Fis cal Year 2025-26: ($59,264) Estimated Fiscal Year 2025-26 Reserve Collection: ($11,474) Projected Ending Balance as of June 30, 2026: $30,316
Reserve Detail as of June 30, 2026
Recommended Operating Reserves(2) $25,482
Available Operating Reserves $25,482
Available Capital Reserves(3) $4,834
As s es s ment Rate (81 Parcels ) $590.00
Notes:
(1) See Appendix "B" for a detailed description of expenses. (2) Operating reserves are needed because the City does not receive the assessment revenue from the County until halfway through the fiscal year. Therefore, it is recommended the City have an operating reserve to fund 6 months of the estimated annual expenditures anticipated to be incurred from July 1 through December 31 of each fiscal year.
(3) Capital reserve funds will be used for Capital Improvement Projects or to replace existing improvements once they have reached the end of their useful life.
TABLE NO. 2: BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BENEFIT AREA II (COUNTRY VIEW)
($50,964)
($1,900)
($2,850)
($14,600)
($14)
($5,500)
($2,000)
($1,000)
($4,000)
($10,800)
($2,100)
($1,900)
($8,300)
($5,900)
($2,400)
($3,200)
($1,100)
823
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART C
-9-
PART C
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The boundary of the District is completely within the boundaries of the City of Clovis .
The Assessment Diagram for the two benefit areas is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovis and is shown on the following page of this Report. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Fresno County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
824
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Birch Ave
Oxford Ave
Harvard Ave
Dartmouth Ave
Oak Ave
Minarets Ave
M
innewawa Ave
Park Creek Dr
Alluvial Ave
Legend
Street Lights
Electronic Gates
Benefit Assessment District Boundary
Landscape Maintenance Areas
Street Maintenance Areas
Parcel Lines
City of Clovis
Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Maintenance Improvement Diagram
BENEFIT
AREA II
BENEFIT
AREA I
±
0 200 400 600 Feet
Chennault Ave
N MinnewawaAve
825
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
-11-
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
This section explains the benefits to property from the street and landscaping improvements and the methodology used to apportion the costs to the benefiting properties within the District.
Discussion of Special Benefit
Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local a gencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements and services which include the construction, operation, maintenance , and servicing of street and landscaping improvements.
Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to property value. This Section states:
“The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service.”
In addition, the 1982 Act permits the designation of zones or areas of benefit within any individual assessment district.
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.
“No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional activities.
Special versus General Benefit
In the absence of an annual assessment, the street and landscaping maintenance activities within each benefit area of the District would not be provided. All the assessment proceeds received from each benefit area will be utilized to fund the cost of 826
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
-12-
providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of property related services which benefit the individual properties with the District . The assessments are also structured to provide specific i mprovements within each benefit area that are of specific and special benefit to property within each benefit area.
The street and landscaping improvements in each benefit area of the District were specifically designed and constructed to provide vehicular access to properties within the respective benefit areas, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the benefit areas have been delineated to include only those parcels that receive a direct benefit from the street and landscaping improvements. Properties located outside the District benefit areas and the public at large do not benefit from th e District street and landscaping improvements.
It is therefore concluded that all street and landscaping maintenance activities funded by the District are of special benefit to the benefiting properties located within the respective benefit areas of the District, and the value of the special benefits to property reasonably exceeds the assessment for every assessed parcel in the District . In other words, as required by Proposition 218: the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel does not exceed the amount of the assessments.
Assessment Methodology
Proposition 218 requires that assessments must be based on the benefit the subject properties receive from the improvements being maintained. The improvements maintained by the District provide vehicular access and enhanced aesthetics to the properties within the District.
Each year, the City shall evaluate the conditions of the improvements to be maintained by the District and estimate the required maintenance and incidental costs to spread to the benefiting properties. A portion of the assessments collected may be set aside for significant capital improvement items, such as seal coats and street surface overlays.
The single- family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessments since it represents all the assessable parcels within the District. All single-family residential parcels have been determined to experience equal vehicular access and enhanced aesthetics from the District street and landscaping improvements. There are 45 single-family residential parcels in Benefit Area I (Renaissance) and 81 single-family residential parcels in Benefit Area I I (Country View) that will be assessed for the maintenance of the improvements. Therefore, th e maintenance and incidental costs for Benefit Area I (Renaissance) will be equally spread t o each of the single -family residential parcels within Benefit Area I (Renaissance) and the maintenance and incidental costs for Benefit Area II (Country View) will be equally spread t o each of the single-family residential parcels within Benefit Area II (Country View).
827
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART D
-13-
Below is a description of each of the benefit areas, their corresponding number and type of parcels within each benefit area, and the method of apportioning the costs of the District street and landscaping improvements to the benefiting parcels.
Benefit Area I (Renaissance)
Benefit Area I (Renaissance) is comprised of 45 single- family residential parcels.
The total assessment revenue needed for Fiscal Year 2025- 26 to operate and maintain the improvements benefiting Benefit Area I (Renaissance) i s $48,375. This results in an assessment of $1,075.00 per Single -Family Residential Parcel that will be levied within Benefit Area I (Renaissance) for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
Also, in FY 202 4-25 property owners approved an annual increase of $55.00 (approximately 5%) to the maximum assessment from Fiscal Year 2025- 26 through Fiscal Year 20 28-29 to keep up with inflationary increases in maintenance costs , accumulate funds for necessary repairs and capital improvement projects, and avoid incurring costs associated with Proposition 218 proceedings for at least the next 5 years. The table below provides a summary of the proposed annual maximum assessments for Fiscal Year 2024- 25 through Fiscal Year 2028 -29. T he annual maximum assessment will remain at $1,240.00 per Single-Family Residential Parcel following Fiscal Year 2028- 29 until another assessment increase is approved by Benefit Area I (Renaissance) property owners.
Fiscal
Year
Assessment
per Single-Family
Residential Parcel
2024-25 $1,020.00
2025-26 $1,075.00
2026-27 $1,130.00
2027-28 $1,185.00
2028-29 $1,240.00
Benefit Area II (Country View)
Benefit Area II (Country View) is comprised of 81 single- family residential parcels.
The total assessment revenue needed for Fiscal Year 2025- 26 to operate and maintain the improvements benefitting Benefit Area II (Country View) is $47,790.
This results in an assessment of $590.00 per Single- Family Residential Parcel that will be levied within Benefit Area II (Country View) for Fiscal Year 2025-26. 828
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1 SECTION II
Fiscal Year 2025-26 PART E
-14-
PART E
PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL
A list of the addresses of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within the District is shown on the last equalized p roperty tax roll of the Fresno County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.
This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the assessments apportioned to each lot or parcel. The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Clovis and is shown in this Report as Appendix “C”.
829
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS FOR
BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE)
830
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A
A - 1
BENEFIT AREA I (RENAISSANCE)
DETAILED STATEMENT OF COSTS
The detailed description of costs for each of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced in Benefit Area I (Renaissance), and those which may be subsequently operated, maintained, and serviced are generally described as follows:
Administrative Expenses
This item encompasses office expenses, postage, and printing that arises during the fiscal year described as follows:
• Office Expenses related to providing information for City Council meetings, quarterly financial reports to the City of Clovis, etc. • Postage for mailings of bills/invoices, checks to vendors, and community notices. • Printing of invoices, notices, announcements, reports, etc.
Based on historical data, the above-mentioned expenses are estimated to be $700 for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
General Maintenance
General maintenance includes costs related to miscellaneous repairs in the common area such as pr essure washing, electri cal and struct ural repairs, painting, sign replacements, backflow testing, etc.
The estimated cost for general maintenance for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $1,000.
Telephone Costs
Telephone costs correspond to monthly charges for the callbox located at the entrance gate which will be used by people at the gate to communicate with residents of Benefit Area I (Renaissance).
There are two gates. One gate is an "Enter Only" gate and the other is an "Exit Only" gate. There is only one telephone to be maintained at the "Enter Only" gate.
The telephone system is a private system and the cost for repair and replacement of the telephone equipment, when needed, will be paid from the capital reserve fund. The estimated cost to fund minor telephone repairs and billing is $1, 200 for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
831
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.
Clovis Benefit Assessment District No. 95-1
Fiscal Year 2025-26 APPENDIX A
A - 2
Electronic Gate Maintenance
There are two electronic gates that will be maintained by Benefit Area I (Renaissance) .
The estimated cost for electronic gate maintenance for Fiscal Year 2025 -26 is $2,100 and funds costs related to drive- thru and pedestrian gate repairs and monthly maintenance.
Street Sweeping
The streets will be swept once every two months within Benefit Area I (Renaissance) for an estimated cost of $700 for Fiscal Year 2025-26.