Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Coachella City Council
July 27, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
July 27, 2022
Body
Coachella City Council
Pages
1,024
Original file
58.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net. That file is the official record.

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.7200e0030.0805 0.0446 3.9000e0040.0131 5.9000e0040.0137 3.7900e0035.7000e0044.3600e0030.0000 37.1341 37.1341 2.8000e0045.2100e00338.6939 Worker 0.0238 0.0151 0.1911 4.7000e0040.0556 2.8000e0040.0558 0.0148 2.6000e0040.0150 0.0000 43.5049 43.5049 1.3200e0031.3100e00343.9281 Total 0.0275 0.0957 0.2357 8.6000e0040.0687 8.7000e0040.0696 0.0185 8.3000e0040.0194 0.0000 80.6390 80.6390 1.6000e0036.5200e00382.6220 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 740 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Total 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 741 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Total 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.3905 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3100e0030.0293 0.0408 7.0000e0051.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0030.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.4000e0040.0000 5.7534 Total 1.3948 0.0293 0.0408 7.0000e0051.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0030.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.4000e0040.0000 5.7534 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 742 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3600e0038.6000e0040.0109 3.0000e0053.1600e0032.0000e0053.1800e0038.4000e0041.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.5004 Total 1.3600e0038.6000e0040.0109 3.0000e0053.1600e0032.0000e0053.1800e0038.4000e0041.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.5004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.3905 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3100e0030.0293 0.0408 7.0000e0051.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0030.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.4000e0040.0000 5.7534 Total 1.3948 0.0293 0.0408 7.0000e0051.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0031.5900e0030.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.4000e0040.0000 5.7534 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 743 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3600e0038.6000e0040.0109 3.0000e0053.1600e0032.0000e0053.1800e0038.4000e0041.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.5004 Total 1.3600e0038.6000e0040.0109 3.0000e0053.1600e0032.0000e0053.1800e0038.4000e0041.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 8.0000e0057.0000e0052.5004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 744 ends

Item 16.

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5254 0.7367 4.9382 0.0116 1.2378 8.9000e0031.2467 0.3304 8.3300e0030.3387 0.0000 1,069.153 6 1,069.153
6 0.0522 0.0530 1,086.237
2 Unmitigated 0.5254 0.7367 4.9382 0.0116 1.2378 8.9000e0031.2467 0.3304 8.3300e0030.3387 0.0000 1,069.153 6 1,069.153
6 0.0522 0.0530 1,086.237
2 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Heavy Industry 992.00 1,284.00 1018.00 3,259,432 3,259,432 Total 992.00 1,284.00 1,018.00 3,259,432 3,259,432
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Heavy Industry 12.50 4.20 5.40 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Heavy Industry 0.519370 0.060618 0.186312 0.143152 0.024585 0.006910 0.010773 0.020267 0.000881 0.000230 0.022128 0.000902 0.003872 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 745 ends

Item 16.

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 170.9682 170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 170.9682 170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 746 ends

Item 16.

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

6.466e
+006

0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009 Total 0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

6.466e
+006

0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009 Total 0.0349 0.3170 0.2663 1.9000e0030.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0241 0.0000 345.0504 345.0504 6.6100e0036.3300e003347.1009 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 747 ends

Item 16.

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

1.984e
+006
170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833
Total 170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

1.984e
+006
170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833
Total 170.9682 0.0297 3.6000e003172.7833
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 748 ends

Item 16.

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.9203 2.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003 Unmitigated 0.9203 2.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1391 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e0042.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003 Total 0.9203 2.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 749 ends

Item 16.

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1391 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e0042.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003 Total 0.9203 2.0000e0051.8300e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.5700e0033.5700e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.8100e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 750 ends

Item 16.

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002
Unmitigated 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

46.25 / 0 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002
Total 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 751 ends

Item 16.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry

46.25 / 0 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002
Total 66.5685 1.5161 0.0367 115.4002
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Unmitigated 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 752 ends

Item 16.

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
248 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Total 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
248 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Total 50.3418 2.9751 0.0000 124.7196
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 753 ends

Item 16.

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:12 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Existing Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 754 ends

Item 16.

Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions
Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer
Project Characteristics - Assumes 1.5 year buildout - 507 DU multifamily housing.

Land Use - Assumes buildout site buildout of 65 DU/AC, total of 507 DU and population of 2,155.

Construction Phase - Assumes paving and arch coating will occur concurrently with building construction.

On-road Fugitive Dust - All roadways accessing the site are paved.

Vehicle Trips -
Road Dust - All roadways will be paved.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes adhearance to standard dust control measures per SCAQMD Rule 403.1 Woodstoves - No wood burning appliances

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Apartments Mid Rise 507.00 Dwelling Unit 7.80 507,000.00 2155

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Imperial Irrigation District
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
189.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 100.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 755 ends

Item 16.

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/8/2023 10/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/14/2023 8/11/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/11/2023 10/12/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/12/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/15/2023 9/1/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 2,080.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 13.34 7.80
tblLandUse Population 1,638.00 2,155.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblRoadDust RoadPercentPave 50 100
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 756 ends

Item 16.

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.5288 33.1294 31.5339 0.0644 19.8076 1.6134 21.4210 10.1424 1.4843 11.6267 0.0000 6,372.873 1 6,372.873
1 1.1967 0.2076 6,452.493
4 2023 67.2064 18.2335 34.5373 0.0718 3.9359 0.8007 4.7366 1.0502 0.7575 1.8076 0.0000 7,100.932 6 7,100.932
6 0.7506 0.2116 7,182.231
5 Maximum 67.2064 33.1294 34.5373 0.0718 19.8076 1.6134 21.4210 10.1424 1.4843 11.6267 0.0000 7,100.932 6 7,100.932
6 1.1967 0.2116 7,182.231
5 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.5288 33.1294 31.5339 0.0644 8.9963 1.6134 10.6096 4.5861 1.4843 6.0704 0.0000 6,372.873 1 6,372.873
1 1.1967 0.2076 6,452.493
4 2023 67.2064 18.2335 34.5373 0.0718 3.9359 0.8007 4.7366 1.0502 0.7575 1.8076 0.0000 7,100.932 6 7,100.932
6 0.7506 0.2116 7,182.231
5 Maximum 67.2064 33.1294 34.5373 0.0718 8.9963 1.6134 10.6096 4.5861 1.4843 6.0704 0.0000 7,100.932 6 7,100.932
6 1.1967 0.2116 7,182.231
5 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 757 ends

Item 16.

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.53 0.00 41.33 49.64 0.00 41.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 758 ends

Item 16.

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Energy 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mobile 8.9091 8.0451 64.8939 0.1308 13.0265 0.0956 13.1221 3.4735 0.0895 3.5630 13,316.82 39 13,316.82
39 0.6831 0.6560 13,529.40
27 Total 23.4708 14.6694 109.2964 0.1723 13.0265 0.8242 13.8506 3.4735 0.8180 4.2916 0.0000 21,234.13 00 21,234.13
00 0.9055 0.7998 21,495.11
28 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Energy 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mobile 8.9091 8.0451 64.8939 0.1308 13.0265 0.0956 13.1221 3.4735 0.0895 3.5630 13,316.82 39 13,316.82
39 0.6831 0.6560 13,529.40
27 Total 23.4708 14.6694 109.2964 0.1723 13.0265 0.8242 13.8506 3.4735 0.8180 4.2916 0.0000 21,234.13 00 21,234.13
00 0.9055 0.7998 21,495.11
28 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 759 ends

Item 16.

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/18/2022 7/29/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/30/2022 8/26/2022 5 20
3 Building Construction Building Construction 8/27/2022 8/11/2023 5 250 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2023 10/18/2023 5 100 5 Paving Paving 9/1/2023 10/12/2023 5 30
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 1,026,675; Residential Outdoor: 342,225; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 760 ends

Item 16.

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 365.00 54.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 73.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 761 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0851 0.0458 0.7017 1.4400e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 145.6432 145.6432 4.5100e0034.2200e003147.0125 Total 0.0851 0.0458 0.7017 1.4400e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 145.6432 145.6432 4.5100e0034.2200e003147.0125 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 762 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0851 0.0458 0.7017 1.4400e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 145.6432 145.6432 4.5100e0034.2200e003147.0125 Total 0.0851 0.0458 0.7017 1.4400e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 145.6432 145.6432 4.5100e0034.2200e003147.0125 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 763 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0382 0.5848 1.2000e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 121.3693 121.3693 3.7600e0033.5100e003122.5104 Total 0.0709 0.0382 0.5848 1.2000e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 121.3693 121.3693 3.7600e0033.5100e003122.5104 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 764 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.1872 0.0000 3.1872 1.5411 0.0000 1.5411 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 3.1872 0.9409 4.1280 1.5411 0.8656 2.4067 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0382 0.5848 1.2000e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 121.3693 121.3693 3.7600e0033.5100e003122.5104 Total 0.0709 0.0382 0.5848 1.2000e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 121.3693 121.3693 3.7600e0033.5100e003122.5104 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 765 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0970 1.8927 0.9408 8.2100e0030.2713 0.0235 0.2947 0.0782 0.0224 0.1006 865.2195 865.2195 7.2500e0030.1221 901.7750 Worker 1.7255 0.9296 14.2298 0.0292 3.0539 0.0161 3.0700 0.8100 0.0148 0.8249 2,953.320 1 2,953.320
1 0.0914 0.0855 2,981.086
2 Total 1.8225 2.8223 15.1705 0.0374 3.3251 0.0396 3.3647 0.8882 0.0373 0.9255 3,818.539 5 3,818.539
5 0.0986 0.2076 3,882.861
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 766 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0970 1.8927 0.9408 8.2100e0030.2713 0.0235 0.2947 0.0782 0.0224 0.1006 865.2195 865.2195 7.2500e0030.1221 901.7750 Worker 1.7255 0.9296 14.2298 0.0292 3.0539 0.0161 3.0700 0.8100 0.0148 0.8249 2,953.320 1 2,953.320
1 0.0914 0.0855 2,981.086
2 Total 1.8225 2.8223 15.1705 0.0374 3.3251 0.0396 3.3647 0.8882 0.0373 0.9255 3,818.539 5 3,818.539
5 0.0986 0.2076 3,882.861
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 767 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0799 1.5600 0.8984 7.9300e0030.2713 0.0121 0.2834 0.0782 0.0116 0.0897 835.9953 835.9953 6.4900e0030.1171 871.0609 Worker 1.5946 0.8214 12.9864 0.0283 3.0539 0.0151 3.0689 0.8100 0.0139 0.8239 2,856.899 4 2,856.899
4 0.0818 0.0788 2,882.412
9 Total 1.6745 2.3813 13.8849 0.0362 3.3251 0.0272 3.3523 0.8882 0.0254 0.9136 3,692.894 8 3,692.894
8 0.0883 0.1959 3,753.473
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 768 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0799 1.5600 0.8984 7.9300e0030.2713 0.0121 0.2834 0.0782 0.0116 0.0897 835.9953 835.9953 6.4900e0030.1171 871.0609 Worker 1.5946 0.8214 12.9864 0.0283 3.0539 0.0151 3.0689 0.8100 0.0139 0.8239 2,856.899 4 2,856.899
4 0.0818 0.0788 2,882.412
9 Total 1.6745 2.3813 13.8849 0.0362 3.3251 0.0272 3.3523 0.8882 0.0254 0.9136 3,692.894 8 3,692.894
8 0.0883 0.1959 3,753.473
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 769 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 63.4485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 63.6402 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.3189 0.1643 2.5973 5.6500e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 571.3799 571.3799 0.0164 0.0158 576.4826 Total 0.3189 0.1643 2.5973 5.6500e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 571.3799 571.3799 0.0164 0.0158 576.4826 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 770 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 63.4485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 63.6402 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.3189 0.1643 2.5973 5.6500e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 571.3799 571.3799 0.0164 0.0158 576.4826 Total 0.3189 0.1643 2.5973 5.6500e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 571.3799 571.3799 0.0164 0.0158 576.4826 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 771 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0655 0.0338 0.5337 1.1600e0030.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 117.4068 117.4068 3.3600e0033.2400e003118.4553 Total 0.0655 0.0338 0.5337 1.1600e0030.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 117.4068 117.4068 3.3600e0033.2400e003118.4553 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 772 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0655 0.0338 0.5337 1.1600e0030.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 117.4068 117.4068 3.3600e0033.2400e003118.4553 Total 0.0655 0.0338 0.5337 1.1600e0030.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 117.4068 117.4068 3.3600e0033.2400e003118.4553 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 773 ends

Item 16.

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 8.9091 8.0451 64.8939 0.1308 13.0265 0.0956 13.1221 3.4735 0.0895 3.5630 13,316.82 39 13,316.82
39 0.6831 0.6560 13,529.40
27 Unmitigated 8.9091 8.0451 64.8939 0.1308 13.0265 0.0956 13.1221 3.4735 0.0895 3.5630 13,316.82 39 13,316.82
39 0.6831 0.6560 13,529.40
27 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 2,758.08 2,489.37 2073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015 Total 2,758.08 2,489.37 2,073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 11.00 3.50 4.50 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.519370 0.060618 0.186312 0.143152 0.024585 0.006910 0.010773 0.020267 0.000881 0.000230 0.022128 0.000902 0.003872 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 774 ends

Item 16.

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
19977.4 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Total 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 775 ends

Item 16.

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Unmitigated 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

19.9774 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Total 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 776 ends

Item 16.

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.7383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

10.8498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.5034 4.3018 1.8306 0.0275 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.0000 5,491.704 7 5,491.704
7 0.1053 0.1007 5,524.339
2 Landscaping 1.2547 0.4814 41.7885 2.2100e0030.2319 0.2319 0.2319 0.2319 75.3160 75.3160 0.0721 77.1191 Total 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 777 ends

Item 16.

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.7383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

10.8498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.5034 4.3018 1.8306 0.0275 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.0000 5,491.704 7 5,491.704
7 0.1053 0.1007 5,524.339
2 Landscaping 1.2547 0.4814 41.7885 2.2100e0030.2319 0.2319 0.2319 0.2319 75.3160 75.3160 0.0721 77.1191 Total 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 778 ends

Item 16.

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:24 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 779 ends

Item 16.

Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions
Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter
Project Characteristics - Assumes 1.5 year buildout - 507 DU multifamily housing.

Land Use - Assumes buildout site buildout of 65 DU/AC, total of 507 DU and population of 2,155.

Construction Phase - Assumes paving and arch coating will occur concurrently with building construction.

On-road Fugitive Dust - All roadways accessing the site are paved.

Vehicle Trips -
Road Dust - All roadways will be paved.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes adhearance to standard dust control measures per SCAQMD Rule 403.1 Woodstoves - No wood burning appliances

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Apartments Mid Rise 507.00 Dwelling Unit 7.80 507,000.00 2155

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Imperial Irrigation District
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
189.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 100.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 780 ends

Item 16.

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/8/2023 10/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/14/2023 8/11/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/11/2023 10/12/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/12/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/15/2023 9/1/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 2,080.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 13.34 7.80
tblLandUse Population 1,638.00 2,155.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblRoadDust RoadPercentPave 50 100
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 781 ends

Item 16.

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2348 33.1307 27.4653 0.0600 19.8076 1.6134 21.4210 10.1424 1.4843 11.6267 0.0000 5,937.196 0 5,937.196
0 1.1966 0.2092 6,017.281
1 2023 66.7466 18.3946 30.1109 0.0668 3.9359 0.8008 4.7367 1.0502 0.7575 1.8077 0.0000 6,597.830 2 6,597.830
2 0.7505 0.2135 6,679.675
8 Maximum 66.7466 33.1307 30.1109 0.0668 19.8076 1.6134 21.4210 10.1424 1.4843 11.6267 0.0000 6,597.830 2 6,597.830
2 1.1966 0.2135 6,679.675
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2348 33.1307 27.4653 0.0600 8.9963 1.6134 10.6096 4.5861 1.4843 6.0704 0.0000 5,937.196 0 5,937.196
0 1.1966 0.2092 6,017.281
1 2023 66.7466 18.3946 30.1109 0.0668 3.9359 0.8008 4.7367 1.0502 0.7575 1.8077 0.0000 6,597.830 2 6,597.830
2 0.7505 0.2135 6,679.675
8 Maximum 66.7466 33.1307 30.1109 0.0668 8.9963 1.6134 10.6096 4.5861 1.4843 6.0704 0.0000 6,597.830 2 6,597.830
2 1.1966 0.2135 6,679.675
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 782 ends

Item 16.

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.53 0.00 41.33 49.64 0.00 41.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 783 ends

Item 16.

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Energy 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mobile 5.7925 8.6941 53.3832 0.1161 13.0265 0.0957 13.1222 3.4735 0.0896 3.5631 11,831.05 57 11,831.05
57 0.7186 0.6686 12,048.27
52 Total 20.3542 15.3183 97.7857 0.1575 13.0265 0.8243 13.8507 3.4735 0.8181 4.2917 0.0000 19,748.36 18 19,748.36
18 0.9411 0.8124 20,013.98
54 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Energy 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mobile 5.7925 8.6941 53.3832 0.1161 13.0265 0.0957 13.1222 3.4735 0.0896 3.5631 11,831.05 57 11,831.05
57 0.7186 0.6686 12,048.27
52 Total 20.3542 15.3183 97.7857 0.1575 13.0265 0.8243 13.8507 3.4735 0.8181 4.2917 0.0000 19,748.36 18 19,748.36
18 0.9411 0.8124 20,013.98
54 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 784 ends

Item 16.

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/18/2022 7/29/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/30/2022 8/26/2022 5 20
3 Building Construction Building Construction 8/27/2022 8/11/2023 5 250 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2023 10/18/2023 5 100 5 Paving Paving 9/1/2023 10/12/2023 5 30
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 1,026,675; Residential Outdoor: 342,225; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 785 ends

Item 16.

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 365.00 54.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 73.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 786 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0646 0.0471 0.4991 1.2300e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 124.0758 124.0758 4.4700e0034.2700e003125.4604 Total 0.0646 0.0471 0.4991 1.2300e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 124.0758 124.0758 4.4700e0034.2700e003125.4604 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 787 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0646 0.0471 0.4991 1.2300e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 124.0758 124.0758 4.4700e0034.2700e003125.4604 Total 0.0646 0.0471 0.4991 1.2300e0030.1506 7.9000e0040.1514 0.0400 7.3000e0040.0407 124.0758 124.0758 4.4700e0034.2700e003125.4604 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 788 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0539 0.0393 0.4159 1.0200e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 103.3965 103.3965 3.7300e0033.5600e003104.5503 Total 0.0539 0.0393 0.4159 1.0200e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 103.3965 103.3965 3.7300e0033.5600e003104.5503 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 789 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.1872 0.0000 3.1872 1.5411 0.0000 1.5411 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 3.1872 0.9409 4.1280 1.5411 0.8656 2.4067 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0539 0.0393 0.4159 1.0200e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 103.3965 103.3965 3.7300e0033.5600e003104.5503 Total 0.0539 0.0393 0.4159 1.0200e0030.1255 6.6000e0040.1262 0.0333 6.1000e0040.0339 103.3965 103.3965 3.7300e0033.5600e003104.5503 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 790 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0910 2.0457 0.9810 8.2200e0030.2713 0.0236 0.2948 0.0782 0.0225 0.1007 866.8811 866.8811 7.0600e0030.1226 903.5915 Worker 1.3108 0.9558 10.1209 0.0249 3.0539 0.0161 3.0700 0.8100 0.0148 0.8249 2,515.981 3 2,515.981
3 0.0907 0.0866 2,544.057
4 Total 1.4018 3.0015 11.1019 0.0331 3.3251 0.0397 3.3648 0.8882 0.0374 0.9256 3,382.862 4 3,382.862
4 0.0978 0.2092 3,447.648
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 791 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0910 2.0457 0.9810 8.2200e0030.2713 0.0236 0.2948 0.0782 0.0225 0.1007 866.8811 866.8811 7.0600e0030.1226 903.5915 Worker 1.3108 0.9558 10.1209 0.0249 3.0539 0.0161 3.0700 0.8100 0.0148 0.8249 2,515.981 3 2,515.981
3 0.0907 0.0866 2,544.057
4 Total 1.4018 3.0015 11.1019 0.0331 3.3251 0.0397 3.3648 0.8882 0.0374 0.9256 3,382.862 4 3,382.862
4 0.0978 0.2092 3,447.648
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 792 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0732 1.6948 0.9333 7.9600e0030.2713 0.0122 0.2834 0.0782 0.0116 0.0898 839.0392 839.0392 6.2700e0030.1179 874.3161 Worker 1.2170 0.8433 9.2687 0.0241 3.0539 0.0151 3.0689 0.8100 0.0139 0.8239 2,435.110 9 2,435.110
9 0.0817 0.0797 2,460.903
8 Total 1.2903 2.5380 10.2020 0.0321 3.3251 0.0272 3.3523 0.8882 0.0255 0.9137 3,274.150 1 3,274.150
1 0.0880 0.1976 3,335.220
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 793 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0732 1.6948 0.9333 7.9600e0030.2713 0.0122 0.2834 0.0782 0.0116 0.0898 839.0392 839.0392 6.2700e0030.1179 874.3161 Worker 1.2170 0.8433 9.2687 0.0241 3.0539 0.0151 3.0689 0.8100 0.0139 0.8239 2,435.110 9 2,435.110
9 0.0817 0.0797 2,460.903
8 Total 1.2903 2.5380 10.2020 0.0321 3.3251 0.0272 3.3523 0.8882 0.0255 0.9137 3,274.150 1 3,274.150
1 0.0880 0.1976 3,335.220
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 794 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 63.4485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 63.6402 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2434 0.1687 1.8537 4.8200e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 487.0222 487.0222 0.0164 0.0159 492.1808 Total 0.2434 0.1687 1.8537 4.8200e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 487.0222 487.0222 0.0164 0.0159 492.1808 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 795 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 63.4485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 63.6402 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2434 0.1687 1.8537 4.8200e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 487.0222 487.0222 0.0164 0.0159 492.1808 Total 0.2434 0.1687 1.8537 4.8200e0030.6108 3.0100e0030.6138 0.1620 2.7700e0030.1648 487.0222 487.0222 0.0164 0.0159 492.1808 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 796 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0500 0.0347 0.3809 9.9000e0040.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 100.0731 100.0731 3.3600e0033.2800e003101.1330 Total 0.0500 0.0347 0.3809 9.9000e0040.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 100.0731 100.0731 3.3600e0033.2800e003101.1330 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 797 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0500 0.0347 0.3809 9.9000e0040.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 100.0731 100.0731 3.3600e0033.2800e003101.1330 Total 0.0500 0.0347 0.3809 9.9000e0040.1255 6.2000e0040.1261 0.0333 5.7000e0040.0339 100.0731 100.0731 3.3600e0033.2800e003101.1330 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 798 ends

Item 16.

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 5.7925 8.6941 53.3832 0.1161 13.0265 0.0957 13.1222 3.4735 0.0896 3.5631 11,831.05 57 11,831.05
57 0.7186 0.6686 12,048.27
52 Unmitigated 5.7925 8.6941 53.3832 0.1161 13.0265 0.0957 13.1222 3.4735 0.0896 3.5631 11,831.05 57 11,831.05
57 0.7186 0.6686 12,048.27
52 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 2,758.08 2,489.37 2073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015 Total 2,758.08 2,489.37 2,073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 11.00 3.50 4.50 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.519370 0.060618 0.186312 0.143152 0.024585 0.006910 0.010773 0.020267 0.000881 0.000230 0.022128 0.000902 0.003872 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 799 ends

Item 16.

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
19977.4 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Total 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 800 ends

Item 16.

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Unmitigated 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

19.9774 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Total 0.2154 1.8411 0.7834 0.0118 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 0.1489 2,350.285 3 2,350.285
3 0.0451 0.0431 2,364.251
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 801 ends

Item 16.

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.7383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

10.8498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.5034 4.3018 1.8306 0.0275 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.0000 5,491.704 7 5,491.704
7 0.1053 0.1007 5,524.339
2 Landscaping 1.2547 0.4814 41.7885 2.2100e0030.2319 0.2319 0.2319 0.2319 75.3160 75.3160 0.0721 77.1191 Total 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 802 ends

Item 16.

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.7383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

10.8498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.5034 4.3018 1.8306 0.0275 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.3478 0.0000 5,491.704 7 5,491.704
7 0.1053 0.1007 5,524.339
2 Landscaping 1.2547 0.4814 41.7885 2.2100e0030.2319 0.2319 0.2319 0.2319 75.3160 75.3160 0.0721 77.1191 Total 14.3462 4.7832 43.6191 0.0297 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.5797 0.0000 5,567.020 7 5,567.020
7 0.1774 0.1007 5,601.458
3 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 803 ends

Item 16.

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 25 Date: 7/18/2022 7:23 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 804 ends

Item 16.

Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions
Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual
Project Characteristics - Assumes 1.5 year buildout - 507 DU multifamily housing.

Land Use - Assumes buildout site buildout of 65 DU/AC, total of 507 DU and population of 2,155.

Construction Phase - Assumes paving and arch coating will occur concurrently with building construction.

On-road Fugitive Dust - All roadways accessing the site are paved.

Vehicle Trips -
Road Dust - All roadways will be paved.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes adhearance to standard dust control measures per SCAQMD Rule 403.1 Woodstoves - No wood burning appliances

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Apartments Mid Rise 507.00 Dwelling Unit 7.80 507,000.00 2155

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 20

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Imperial Irrigation District
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
189.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 100.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 805 ends

Item 16.

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/8/2023 10/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/14/2023 8/11/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/11/2023 10/12/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/12/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/15/2023 9/1/2023
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 2,080.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 13.34 7.80
tblLandUse Population 1,638.00 2,155.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust HaulingPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust VendorPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblOnRoadDust WorkerPercentPave 50.00 100.00
tblRoadDust RoadPercentPave 50 100
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 806 ends

Item 16.

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1801 1.2092 1.5492 3.2800e0030.3190 0.0557 0.3746 0.1248 0.0520 0.1768 0.0000 293.8962 293.8962 0.0428 8.5200e003297.5048 2023 3.4466 1.5751 2.6225 5.6200e0030.2949 0.0695 0.3644 0.0788 0.0654 0.1442 0.0000 503.1411 503.1411 0.0616 0.0150 509.1410 Maximum 3.4466 1.5751 2.6225 5.6200e0030.3190 0.0695 0.3746 0.1248 0.0654 0.1768 0.0000 503.1411 503.1411 0.0616 0.0150 509.1410 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1801 1.2092 1.5492 3.2800e0030.2260 0.0557 0.2816 0.0782 0.0520 0.1302 0.0000 293.8960 293.8960 0.0428 8.5200e003297.5046 2023 3.4466 1.5751 2.6225 5.6200e0030.2949 0.0695 0.3644 0.0788 0.0654 0.1442 0.0000 503.1408 503.1408 0.0616 0.0150 509.1407 Maximum 3.4466 1.5751 2.6225 5.6200e0030.2949 0.0695 0.3644 0.0788 0.0654 0.1442 0.0000 503.1408 503.1408 0.0616 0.0150 509.1407 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 807 ends

Item 16.

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.15 0.00 12.58 22.89 0.00 14.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-18-2022 10-17-2022 0.7915 0.7915
2 10-18-2022 1-17-2023 0.7021 0.7021
3 1-18-2023 4-17-2023 0.6374 0.6374
4 4-18-2023 7-17-2023 1.7487 1.7487
5 7-18-2023 9-30-2023 2.0525 2.0525
Highest 2.0525 2.0525

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.0900e0032.0000e00417.0715 Energy 0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 562.1288 562.1288 0.0375 0.0108 566.2779 Mobile 1.1773 1.4560 9.5839 0.0211 2.2272 0.0165 2.2438 0.5945 0.0155 0.6099 0.0000 1,947.931 8 1,947.931
8 0.1072 0.1031 1,981.348
3 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 47.3416 0.0000 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.4799 57.0031 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716 Total 3.6279 1.8446 13.4918 0.0235 2.2272 0.0653 2.2925 0.5945 0.0643 0.6587 57.8214 2,583.924 2 2,641.745
6 4.0349 0.1407 2,784.556
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 808 ends

Item 16.

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.0900e0032.0000e00417.0715 Energy 0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 562.1288 562.1288 0.0375 0.0108 566.2779 Mobile 1.1773 1.4560 9.5839 0.0211 2.2272 0.0165 2.2438 0.5945 0.0155 0.6099 0.0000 1,947.931 8 1,947.931
8 0.1072 0.1031 1,981.348
3 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 47.3416 0.0000 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.4799 57.0031 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716 Total 3.6279 1.8446 13.4918 0.0235 2.2272 0.0653 2.2925 0.5945 0.0643 0.6587 57.8214 2,583.924 2 2,641.745
6 4.0349 0.1407 2,784.556
0 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/18/2022 7/29/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/30/2022 8/26/2022 5 20
3 Building Construction Building Construction 8/27/2022 8/11/2023 5 250 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 809 ends

Item 16.
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2023 10/18/2023 5 100 5 Paving Paving 9/1/2023 10/12/2023 5 30
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 1,026,675; Residential Outdoor: 342,225; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 810 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0983 8.0600e0030.1064 0.0505 7.4200e0030.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 365.00 54.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 73.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.40 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 811 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.4000e0042.3000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6021 0.6021 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6083 Total 3.4000e0042.3000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6021 0.6021 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6083 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0442 0.0000 0.0442 0.0227 0.0000 0.0227 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0048.0600e0038.0600e0037.4200e0037.4200e0030.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e0040.0442 8.0600e0030.0523 0.0227 7.4200e0030.0302 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8549 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 812 ends

Item 16.

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.4000e0042.3000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6021 0.6021 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6083 Total 3.4000e0042.3000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6021 0.6021 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6083 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0708 9.4100e0030.0802 0.0343 8.6600e0030.0429 0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 813 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.6700e0031.0000e0051.2400e0031.0000e0051.2500e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0036 1.0036 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0139 Total 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.6700e0031.0000e0051.2400e0031.0000e0051.2500e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0036 1.0036 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0139 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0319 0.0000 0.0319 0.0154 0.0000 0.0154 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0049.4100e0039.4100e0038.6600e0038.6600e0030.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e0040.0319 9.4100e0030.0413 0.0154 8.6600e0030.0241 0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2654 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 814 ends

Item 16.

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.6700e0031.0000e0051.2400e0031.0000e0051.2500e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0036 1.0036 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0139 Total 5.7000e0043.8000e0044.6700e0031.0000e0051.2400e0031.0000e0051.2500e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0036 1.0036 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0139 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0768 0.7027 0.7364 1.2100e0030.0364 0.0364 0.0343 0.0343 0.0000 104.2764 104.2764 0.0250 0.0000 104.9009 Total 0.0768 0.7027 0.7364 1.2100e0030.0364 0.0364 0.0343 0.0343 0.0000 104.2764 104.2764 0.0250 0.0000 104.9009 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 815 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2000e0030.0900 0.0431 3.7000e0040.0121 1.0600e0030.0132 3.4900e0031.0100e0034.5000e0030.0000 35.3496 35.3496 2.9000e0044.9900e00336.8453 Worker 0.0629 0.0419 0.5112 1.2000e0030.1358 7.3000e0040.1365 0.0361 6.7000e0040.0367 0.0000 109.8901 109.8901 3.5900e0033.4800e003111.0161 Total 0.0671 0.1319 0.5542 1.5700e0030.1479 1.7900e0030.1497 0.0395 1.6800e0030.0412 0.0000 145.2397 145.2397 3.8800e0038.4700e003147.8614 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0768 0.7027 0.7364 1.2100e0030.0364 0.0364 0.0343 0.0343 0.0000 104.2762 104.2762 0.0250 0.0000 104.9008 Total 0.0768 0.7027 0.7364 1.2100e0030.0364 0.0364 0.0343 0.0343 0.0000 104.2762 104.2762 0.0250 0.0000 104.9008 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 816 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2000e0030.0900 0.0431 3.7000e0040.0121 1.0600e0030.0132 3.4900e0031.0100e0034.5000e0030.0000 35.3496 35.3496 2.9000e0044.9900e00336.8453 Worker 0.0629 0.0419 0.5112 1.2000e0030.1358 7.3000e0040.1365 0.0361 6.7000e0040.0367 0.0000 109.8901 109.8901 3.5900e0033.4800e003111.0161 Total 0.0671 0.1319 0.5542 1.5700e0030.1479 1.7900e0030.1497 0.0395 1.6800e0030.0412 0.0000 145.2397 145.2397 3.8800e0038.4700e003147.8614 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1258 1.1508 1.2995 2.1600e0030.0560 0.0560 0.0527 0.0527 0.0000 185.4438 185.4438 0.0441 0.0000 186.5467 Total 0.1258 1.1508 1.2995 2.1600e0030.0560 0.0560 0.0527 0.0527 0.0000 185.4438 185.4438 0.0441 0.0000 186.5467 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 817 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.0800e0030.1318 0.0730 6.4000e0040.0215 9.7000e0040.0225 6.2000e0039.3000e0047.1300e0030.0000 60.7649 60.7649 4.6000e0048.5300e00363.3174 Worker 0.1035 0.0658 0.8304 2.0600e0030.2414 1.2000e0030.2426 0.0641 1.1100e0030.0652 0.0000 189.0393 189.0393 5.7400e0035.6900e003190.8779 Total 0.1096 0.1976 0.9034 2.7000e0030.2629 2.1700e0030.2651 0.0703 2.0400e0030.0723 0.0000 249.8042 249.8042 6.2000e0030.0142 254.1952 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1258 1.1508 1.2995 2.1600e0030.0560 0.0560 0.0527 0.0527 0.0000 185.4436 185.4436 0.0441 0.0000 186.5464 Total 0.1258 1.1508 1.2995 2.1600e0030.0560 0.0560 0.0527 0.0527 0.0000 185.4436 185.4436 0.0441 0.0000 186.5464 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 818 ends

Item 16.

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.0800e0030.1318 0.0730 6.4000e0040.0215 9.7000e0040.0225 6.2000e0039.3000e0047.1300e0030.0000 60.7649 60.7649 4.6000e0048.5300e00363.3174 Worker 0.1035 0.0658 0.8304 2.0600e0030.2414 1.2000e0030.2426 0.0641 1.1100e0030.0652 0.0000 189.0393 189.0393 5.7400e0035.6900e003190.8779 Total 0.1096 0.1976 0.9034 2.7000e0030.2629 2.1700e0030.2651 0.0703 2.0400e0030.0723 0.0000 249.8042 249.8042 6.2000e0030.0142 254.1952 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.1724 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.5800e0030.0652 0.0906 1.5000e0043.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0030.0000 12.7663 12.7663 7.6000e0040.0000 12.7854 Total 3.1820 0.0652 0.0906 1.5000e0043.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0030.0000 12.7663 12.7663 7.6000e0040.0000 12.7854 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 819 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0129 8.2200e0030.1038 2.6000e0040.0302 1.5000e0040.0303 8.0100e0031.4000e0048.1500e0030.0000 23.6299 23.6299 7.2000e0047.1000e00423.8597 Total 0.0129 8.2200e0030.1038 2.6000e0040.0302 1.5000e0040.0303 8.0100e0031.4000e0048.1500e0030.0000 23.6299 23.6299 7.2000e0047.1000e00423.8597 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.1724 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.5800e0030.0652 0.0906 1.5000e0043.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0030.0000 12.7663 12.7663 7.6000e0040.0000 12.7854 Total 3.1820 0.0652 0.0906 1.5000e0043.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0033.5400e0030.0000 12.7663 12.7663 7.6000e0040.0000 12.7854 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 820 ends

Item 16.

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0129 8.2200e0030.1038 2.6000e0040.0302 1.5000e0040.0303 8.0100e0031.4000e0048.1500e0030.0000 23.6299 23.6299 7.2000e0047.1000e00423.8597 Total 0.0129 8.2200e0030.1038 2.6000e0040.0302 1.5000e0040.0303 8.0100e0031.4000e0048.1500e0030.0000 23.6299 23.6299 7.2000e0047.1000e00423.8597 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 821 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Total 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0155 0.1529 0.2188 3.4000e0047.6500e0037.6500e0037.0400e0037.0400e0030.0000 30.0403 30.0403 9.7200e0030.0000 30.2832 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 822 ends

Item 16.

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Total 8.0000e0045.1000e0046.4000e0032.0000e0051.8600e0031.0000e0051.8700e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 1.4566 1.4566 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.4708 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 823 ends

Item 16.

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.1773 1.4560 9.5839 0.0211 2.2272 0.0165 2.2438 0.5945 0.0155 0.6099 0.0000 1,947.931 8 1,947.931
8 0.1072 0.1031 1,981.348
3 Unmitigated 1.1773 1.4560 9.5839 0.0211 2.2272 0.0165 2.2438 0.5945 0.0155 0.6099 0.0000 1,947.931 8 1,947.931
8 0.1072 0.1031 1,981.348
3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 2,758.08 2,489.37 2073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015 Total 2,758.08 2,489.37 2,073.63 5,865,015 5,865,015
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 11.00 3.50 4.50 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.519370 0.060618 0.186312 0.143152 0.024585 0.006910 0.010773 0.020267 0.000881 0.000230 0.022128 0.000902 0.003872 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 824 ends

Item 16.

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 173.0127 173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 173.0127 173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 825 ends

Item 16.

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

7.29176e
+006

0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284 Total 0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

7.29176e
+006

0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284 Total 0.0393 0.3360 0.1430 2.1400e0030.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 389.1161 389.1161 7.4600e0037.1300e003391.4284 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 826 ends

Item 16.

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

2.00773e
+006
173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495
Total 173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

2.00773e
+006
173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495
Total 173.0127 0.0301 3.6400e003174.8495
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 827 ends

Item 16.

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.0900e0032.0000e00417.0715 Unmitigated 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.0900e0032.0000e00417.0715

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.9801 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7113 10.7113 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7749 Landscaping 0.1129 0.0433 3.7610 2.0000e0040.0209 0.0209 0.0209 0.0209 0.0000 6.1493 6.1493 5.8900e0030.0000 6.2965 Total 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.1000e0032.0000e00417.0715 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 828 ends

Item 16.

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.9801 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7113 10.7113 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7749 Landscaping 0.1129 0.0433 3.7610 2.0000e0040.0209 0.0209 0.0209 0.0209 0.0000 6.1493 6.1493 5.8900e0030.0000 6.2965 Total 2.4113 0.0526 3.7649 2.6000e0040.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 16.8606 16.8606 6.1000e0032.0000e00417.0715 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 829 ends

Item 16.

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716
Unmitigated 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

33.0331 /

20.8252

67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716
Total 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 830 ends

Item 16.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

33.0331 /

20.8252

67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716
Total 67.4829 1.0863 0.0266 102.5716
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Unmitigated 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 831 ends

Item 16.

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
233.22 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Total 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
233.22 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Total 47.3416 2.7978 0.0000 117.2867
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 832 ends

Item 16.

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 7/18/2022 7:25 AM Coachella EIR Addendum: Proposed Conditions - Salton Sea Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 833 ends

Item 16.

ORDINANCE NO. 1198

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COACHELLA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
A CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22-02 A ZONING RECLASSIFICATION

FROM (M-H) HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO URBAN EMPLOYMENT
CENTER ON A 7.8 ACRE SITE (APN 763-400-016 AND 763-400-017)

LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF INDUSTRIAL WAY
AND AVENUE 52. CITY-INITIATED.

WHEREAS, in 2015, the City of Coachella (“City”) adopted a General Plan Update to guide development and provide a basis for decision-making for the City through 2035; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), in 2015 the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (“CGPU EIR”) (SCH # 2009021007), in connection with the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the CGPU EIR considered buildout conditions of the Proposed Land Use Plan, which included the maximum buildout potential of a 7.8-acre site located near the southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Industrial Way (“Project Site”) under the “Industrial District” land use designation; and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the development of the City parcels , the City proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the 7.8-acre site from “Industrial District” to “Urban Employment Center” and a Change of Zone to reclassify the site from M-H, Heavy Industrial, to Urban Employment Center Zoning District (“Project”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) has been certified or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) has been adopted, the lead agency is required to review any changed circumstances to determine whether any of the circumstances under Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 require additional environmental review; and
WHEREAS, by way of preparation of an Addendum, the City has evaluated the Project in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review outlined in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162; and WHEREAS, based on that analysis, the City Council has concluded that approval of the Project does not require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR because there is no possibility for new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant environmental effects; and WHEREAS, the City, as lead agency, determined an Addendum to the certified CGPU EIR should therefore be prepared for the Project’s proposed minor technical changes; and WHEREAS, on July 26, 2022 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to review the project, as modified and the related environmental documents, at which time during the hearing members of the public were given an opportunity to testify regarding the Project; and

Page 834 ends

Item 16.

Ordinance No. 1198

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a properly noticed public hearing on July 27, 2022 at which members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment on this Ordinance, the recommendations of staff, and other public testimony.

WHEREAS, the City Council carefully considered all information pertaining to the Project, including the staff report, and all of the information, evidence, and testimony presented at its public hearing; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council hereby ordains approval of Change of Zone No. 22-02, a zoning reclassification from M-H (Heavy Industrial) to Urban Employment Center for 7.8 acres of vacant land located near the southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Industrial Way subject to the findings listed below and Change of Zone exhibit of “Exhibit A.”
Findings for Change of Zone No. 22-02:

1. The proposed change of zone will serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and will provide good zoning practice for the vicinity of the site. The site would be within the Urban Employment Center land use designation upon approval of General Plan Amendment 22-01. The re-zoning of the property would allow for new affordable, high density residential, which will promote the City’s long-term residential development goals for the larger vicinity and help in meeting the RHNA numbers as assigned by SCAG. The rezoning would also accommodate potential research and development, retail, education and professional office uses.

2. The proposed change of zone is consistent with the intent and purpose of the City’s General Plan in that the proposed Urban Employment Center zoning would allow future high-density multi-family residential, research and development, retail, education and professional office uses, which assist in keeping with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The proposed change of zone is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which upon approval of General Plan Amendment 22-01 designates the subject property as Urban Employment Center. The proposed Urban Employment Center zoning is a conforming zone in the Urban Employment Center General Plan land use designation.

The subject site is located towards the northern end of General Plan Subarea 7 and the General Plan here encouraged uses to focus on office and research and development rather than the southerly part of the Subarea 7 towards Avenue 54, where uses should be more industrial, warehouse and distribution.

Page 835 ends

Item 16.

Ordinance No. 1198

Page 3 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 27th day of July, 2022 by the following vote:

ROLL CALL:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstaining:

By___________________________
Steven Hernandez, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ ____________________________ Angela M. Zepeda, City Clerk Carlos Campos
City of Coachella City Attorney

Page 836 ends

Item 16.
763400017
763400016
¯
Industrial Way
CZ No. 22-02 Change of Zone Exhibit
Existing Zoning District:
(M-H) Heavy Industrial
Proposed Zoning District:

Urban Employment Center
Exhibit A

Page 837 ends

Item 16.

Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Vicinity Map
¯
Site
Industrial Way
Avenue 52

Page 838 ends

Item 16.

STAFF REPORT
7/27/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Gabriel Perez, Development Services Director
SUBJECT: Rancho Escondido Event Venue
SPECIFICS: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-79 approving Entertainment Permit No. 22-02 for the Rancho Escondido Event Venue, an outdoor entertainment venue located on an 8.6-acre site at 85321 Avenue 44 (APN# 696-520-014). Applicant: Leonel Lopez and Margarita Lopez
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2022-79 approving Entertainment Permit No. 22-02, pursuant to the findings and conditions of approval contained in the attached resolution.

BACKGROUND:

The subject site is an 8.6-acre equestrian and residential property at 85321 Avenue 44 located towards the City’s northerly boundary largely surrounded by vacant properties and the nearest residential neighborhood is the Four Seasons at Terra Lago active adult community (55 and over) approximately 1,125 feet northerly from the nearest point of the subject site at Avenue 44. The property is flag-shaped with a long unimproved driveway of approximately 751 feet. The driveway has an existing aggregate base surface for dust control purposes.

The “flag” portion of the property includes a barn, horse stables, and an existing residence on the northern portion. The center of the property includes 17,000 sq ft plaza area with a kitchen building, restroom building, covered stage area, concrete sidewalks enclosed within white ranch rail fencing. The plaza area is intended by the applicant for outdoor events that would be permitted if the City Council approves the requested entertainment permit. The plaza area has landscape improvements consisting of turf and date palm trees. A circular driveway with an aggregate base surface encircles the plaza area and a 22,000 sq. ft. vacant area that the applicant intends to use for guest parking. City staff requested that the applicant submit the entertainment permit application due to the site operating as an event venue without entertainment permit approval from the City of Coachella. The applicant ceased event operations at the site and is awaiting City approval of the entertainment permit in order to resume event venue operations.

The subject property is in the Resort District of the General Plan, which includes allowed uses of residential, lodging, recreational and support retail, commercial services, theme parks, sports

Page 839 ends

Item 17.
venues, and specialized entertainment venues. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan Vision of the area as a place for a range of entertainment and destination uses that requires a large amount of land and draw visitors to the City.

Entertainment permits are permitted under Chapter 5.24 of the Coachella Municipal Code under Title 5 (Business Licenses and Regulations). Application for an entertainment permit require an investigation of the application by the City Manager and consideration of the proposal at a public hearing by the City Council. If the City elects to grant the entertainment permit, it may impose conditions that include:

1. The days and hours during which the entertainment establishment may operate.

2. The total number of persons including employees and entertainers allowed during its operation.

3. Traffic control measures including the number of parking spaces required for the entertainment establishment.

4. Noise control measures required in the entertainment establishment.

5. Security or safety measures of the patrons, employees, neighbors and general public of the entertainment establishment, including the number of security personnel which may be altered by the chief of police.

6. The placement and utilization of hand-held metal detectors at each entrance to the entertainment establishment for the purpose of ascertaining and removal of weapons from each and every person entering the entertainment establishment to the satisfaction of the chief of police.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The applicant, Leonel Lopez and Margarita Lopez, submitted a request for an entertainment permit to allow the operation of an outdoor entertainment venue on an 8.6-acre site at 85-321 Avenue 44.

The zoning designation of the commercial center where the store is proposed is within the R-E (Residential Estate). The entertainment venue would accommodate a range of events that would be proposed on Saturdays from 12 p.m. to 12 a.m. and accommodate up to 200 guests. The event types may include, but not limited to:
 Family event
 Birthdays
 Anniversaries
 Weddings
 Mariachi practice
The applicant intends to utilize local small business vendors to provide event coordination, table and chair rentals, photo booths, cakes and desserts, caterers, inflatable jumpers, video and photographers, parking attendants, mariachi and DJ’s.

Page 840 ends

Item 17.

Rancho Escondido location
Staff contacted the Lieutenant Vasquez with the Riverside County Sheriff regarding any concerns for the proposed business that the City Council may want to consider when making findings or including conditions of approval for the entertainment permit. Lieutenant Vasquez did not identify any concerns with the business and does not recommend any conditions of approval. The Fire Department has no concerns with the facility and have provided conditions of approval for the entertainment venue.

Hours of Operation:

The applicant has not indicated operating hours on Saturdays from 12 p.m. to 12 a.m.

Environmental Setting:

The subject site is a vacant site that is substantially surrounded by urban uses, with adjoining zoning and land uses as follows:

North: Avenue 44 and City of Indio / (PMP) Project Master Plan – City of Indio South: Vacant / (R-E, Residential Estate)
East: Vacant/ (R-M PUD, Residential Multiple Family - Planned Unit Development) West: Vacant/ (R-M, Residential Multiple Family)

Page 841 ends

Item 17.

Site Plan / Parking and Circulation:

The site is accessed Avenue 44 which is a Primary Arterial, which at full construction would accommodate 4 vehicular lanes and bike lanes. The existing Avenue 44 is improved with two vehicular lanes and an improved roadway about 25 feet wide with unpaved shoulders. The Northside of Avenue 44 is in the City of Indio and the Southside of Avenue 44 is part of the City of Coachella. Vehicular access to the subject site would occur from a 751-foot long driveway that accommodates stacking for 37 vehicles. Parking is provided to the north, west, east and south of the event venue assembly area that can accommodate 65 vehicles and an area for 60 parking spaces for overflow parking. The limited timeframe for events at the venue including appropriate number of vehicle stacking on-site would pose a minimal impact to traffic on Avenue 44 or for the intersection of Avenue 44 and Dillon Road.

The event area is centralized in a 17,000 sq ft plaza area with existing improvements that include a kitchen building, restroom building, covered stage area with concrete dance floor/gathering area, concrete sidewalks enclosed within white ranch rail fencing. Wedding ceremonies would be held on the turf area on the west side of the plaza to take advantage of the valley and mountain views to the West. The stage area would serve as the area for staging music and amplified sound and oriented towards the southeast. The applicant identified a maximum occupancy of 200 guests with two types of events expected which include small events for 80-100 guests and large events between 150-200 guests. The applicant proposes 2 parking attendants for small events and 3 parking attendants for large events.

Security:

The applicant proposes the use of on-site licensed security for all events and proposed to include 1 security guard for every 50 people. All private events that lease from the applicant will be required to use licensed security. The applicant is required to increase security personnel based on recommendations by the City Manager or Coachella Police.

Noise
The special event activities with use of amplified music is proposed and would generate noise onsite and therefore the applicant engaged LSA Associates to prepare a noise analysis (LSA Noise Analysis for Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue in Coachella Attachment 5). The noise analysis was prepared to determine the maximum noise level that can be generated by the event venue to be consistent with the City of Coachella Municipal Code noise standards by identifying the noise impact to existing receptors that include
The Lodge Four Seasons at Terra Lago in the City of Indio, a date farm to the north in the City of Indio, Coachella Lakes RV Resort located east in the City of Coachella, and Love’s Travel Stop located to the Southeast in the City of Coachella. The analysis concluded that the event venue could generate a maximum noise level of 85.5 continuous sound level in A-weighted decibels at a distance of 50 feet from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm and 75.5 decibels at a distance of 50 feet from 10 pm to 6 am to maintain compliance with the City’s 10-minute noise standards of 55 dBA from

Page 842 ends

Item 17.
6:00 am to 10 pm and 45 dBA from 10:00 pm to 6 am. The noise analysis did not factor the directionality of speakers or any shielding by the event venue operators. The speakers would be directed in a southeast direction from the stage area, minimizing directionality of noise to residences to the North.

Correspondence Received
Staff received correspondence from residents of the Terra Lago community in the City of Indio in opposition to the proposed event venue when the venue was operating without an entertainment permit. The general concerns raised in the correspondence relate to noise and traffic concerns.

One letter was not opposed, but the commenter requested that the operator comply with the noise ordinance. The project is required to comply with the City’s noise ordinance. The entertainment permit may be revoked by the City Council for failure to comply with the City’s noise ordinance and entertainment permit conditions of approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

A determination was made by the Development Services Department that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and hereby prepares and proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for this project. A 20-day review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration commenced on July 7, 2022 and ends July 27, 2022 for interested and concerned individuals and public agencies to submit written comments on the documents. The proposed project consists of the operation, licensing and minor alteration of an existing location involving no expansion of existing or former commercial use on the property. The subject site has been used for residential and equestrian related uses and no expansions of floor area are proposed.

The project has the potential to result in short-term noise impacts due to noise related to entertainment related events. Noise impacts are considered significant if they expose persons to levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan as discussed above. The event venue would be required to comply with the City’s noise ordinance as afformentioned and would therefore result in impacts that would be less than significant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

As conditioned, the proposed Entertainment Permit would not have any fiscal impacts upon the City of Coachella finances. There are no additional fees collected for this type of business other than normal licensing fees for the business.

ALTERNATIVES:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-79 approving Entertainment Permit 22-02 with the staff recommendations.
2) Approve the Entertainment Permit with new or modified conditions of approval. 3) Make findings and Deny the Entertainment Permit.
4) Continue the item and provide staff direction.

Page 843 ends

Item 17.

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
Based on the analysis contained herein and the findings listed below, staff is recommending that the City Council approve Alternative #1.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. PC 2022-79
Exhibit A Negative Declaration
Exhibit B Conditions of Approval

2. Vicinity Map

3. Project Description

4. Site Plan

5. Noise Analysis – LSA Associates

6. Existing Photos

7. Comment letters/Emails/Petitions

Page 844 ends

Item 17.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-79

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARTION
(ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 22-01) PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVAL OF
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 22-02 FOR RANCHO ESCONDIDO
ENTERTAINMENT VENUE LOCATED ON A 8.6 ACRE SITE AT 85321 AVENUE 44 (APN# 696-520-014). APPLICANT: LEONEL LOPEZ AND

MARGARITA LOPEZ
WHEREAS, Leonel Lopez and Margarita Lopez filed an application for Entertainment Permit No. 22-02 to allow a 8.6-acre outdoor entertainment venue where alcohol is served on a vacant site located at 85321 Avenue 44; Assessor’s Parcel No. 696-520-014 (“Project”); and, WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Entertainment Permit No. 22-02 on July 21, 2022 at the 1515 6th Street, Coachella, California regarding the proposed Project; and,
WHEREAS, at the City Council hearing, the Applicant and members of the public were present and were afforded an opportunity to testify regarding the Project; and, WHEREAS, the Project is permitted pursuant to Chapter 15.24 of the Coachella Municipal Code.

WHEREAS, the proposed use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is consistent with the objectives of the City’s General Plan, and is not detrimental to the existing uses or the uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed outdoor entertainment venue with where alcohol is served; and, WHEREAS, the site for proposed use relates properly to streets which are designed to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; and, WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and determined that the project would not create any significant impacts; and,
WHEREAS, the conditions as stipulated by the City are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Coachella, California considered the Negative Declaration prepared for Entertainment Permit No. 22-02, as listed in Exhibit A. and has determined that the project would have no significant

Page 845 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79

Page 2 ends

deleterious effect on the environment and orders that a Negative Declaration be adopted and filed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality. The City Council of the City of Coachella hereby approves Entertainment Permit No. 22-02, subject to the findings and conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B.

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO 22-02:

1. The information provided in the application is accurate, complete and truthful, as evidenced by staff and there are no known violations of any laws, ordinances, or regulations related to the applicant's fitness to manage or operate the proposed entertainment venue.

2. The applicant possesses the required moral character to comply with the requirements of Chapter 5.24 and the conditions of approval imposed herein. As conditioned, the proposed added security measures will ensure that the public safety for the business will be maintained to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police.

3. The applicant has sufficient resources and expertise to operate the proposed entertainment venue in a safe, professional and effective manner in accordance with the City's Municipal Code. The Coachella Police and Fire Department reviewed the project and expressed no concerns regarding the ability of the owner and the project to operate the venue in a safe, professional and effective manner.

4. The proposed use will not be in conflict with, but will be in harmony with and in accordance with the objectives of the general plan because the proposed entertainment venue is in the Resort District of the General Plan, which includes allowed uses of residential, lodging, recreational and support retail, commercial services, theme parks, sports venues, and specialized entertainment venues. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan Vision of the area as a place for a range of entertainment and destination uses that requires a large amount of land and draw visitors to the City.

6. The Project will not create any significant impacts to the environment based upon a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project contained in the Negative Declaration, Initial Study, and administrative record. The Negative Declaration and the Initial Study have been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Coachella’s Local CEQA Guidelines.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27th day of July 2022. ___________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Angela M. Zepeda
City Clerk

Page 846 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79

Page 3 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Carlos Campos
City Attorney

Page 847 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79

Page 4 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF COACHELLA
)
) ss.
)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-79 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Coachella at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of July 2022, by the following vote of Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Andrea J. Carranza, MMC
Deputy City Clerk

Page 848 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA
INITIAL STUDY 22-01
FOR
Rancho Escondido Event Venue

PREPARED BY
City of Coachella
Development Services Department
85321 Avenue 44
Coachella, CA 92236
(760) 398-3102
July 6, 2022

Page 849 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 1
Negative Declaration – July, 2022
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared.

1. Project Title: Rancho Escondida Event Venue

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Coachella, Development Services Department, 53990 Enterprise Way, Coachella, CA 92236

3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gabriel Perez (760)398-3102

4. Project Location: 85321 Avenue 44, Coachella CA, 92236 (APN # 696-520-014)

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:

Leonel Lopez and Margarita Lopez , 85321 Avenue 44, Coachella, CA 92236

6. General Plan Designation: Resort District 7. Zoning: Residential Estate (R-E)

8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.)
Entertainment Permit for an outdoor special event venue on an 8.6 acre equestrian property at 85321 Avenue 44 in the R-E Residential Estate Zone. The special event venue would be for family events, birthdays, anniversaries, weddings, and mariachi events with an occupancy of 200 people. A central event location for outdoor dining and gathering has been constructed with concrete walkways, bathroom facilities, kitchen building covered stage area, and grass turf area. The stage is directed in the Southeast direction and would be a location where musical performances and amplified music would be staged. Parking for 76 spaces would be accommodated on-site.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) The subject location is surrounded by the following:

To the North: The site is near the City of Coachella northern boundary, which is bordered by Avenue 44 and to the North is the City of Indio. The property directly North is zoned Residential Estate and Resort District in the General Plan.

To the South: Vacant parcels zoned Residential-Estate and Resort District in the General Plan.

To the East: Vacant parcel zoned Residential Multiple Family – Planned Unit Development and Resort District in the General Plan.

To the West: Vacant parcel zoned Residential Multiple Family and Resort District in the General Plan.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):

California Alcohol Beverage Control is necessary for any alcohol service related to special events.

City of Coachella City Council – Entertainment Permit Approval

11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1?

Page 850 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 2
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
If so, has consultation begun? Transmittal to Native American tribes has occurred for tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. No requests to consult have been received to date.

Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.

Page 851 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 3
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map

Page 852 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 4
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture/Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population /
Housing
Public Services Recreation
Transportation /
Traffic
Utilities / Service
Systems
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Tribal Cultural
Resources
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency):

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature
7/6/22
Date

Page 853 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 5
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Gabriel Perez
Printed Name
City of Coachella
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

Page 854 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 6
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista as identified in the City’s General Plan?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character of quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime view in the
area?
Discussion:
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No impact. A review of the City of Coachella General Plan shows the site is not part of or located within a City adopted or designated scenic vista. The project will have no impact to a City designated scenic vista. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No impact. There are no state scenic highways either on or adjacent to the site based on a review of the California Scenic Highway Mapping System Scenic Route information. In addition, there are no state designated scenic highways visible from the site. The project will have no impact to trees, rock outcroppings, historic buildings, or any other resources in a scenic highway because a state scenic highway is not located on or adjacent to the site. There is no on-site development construction proposed with this request.

Page 855 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 7
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
No Impact. The project site is largely improved with an existing residential unit, barn and accessory buildings within the subject site and does not include any significant scenic resources. The existing development conforms with existing height regulations of the City of Coachella height regulations for the Residential Estate Zone of a maximum height of 35 feet. The General Plan Draft EIR identifies two scenic highways within the planning area that includes Interstate 10 and Dillon Road. Interstate 10 is located approximately .8 miles from the subject site. Dillon Road is located .6 miles from the subject site. The subject venue would not degrade the visual character from the scenic highways as existing buildings would remain and are low profile buildings.
d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less than significant impact. The project site includes an existing residence and barn with very little light or glare generated from single family residential sources. The light generated by an outdoor event venue could include lighting, that if not shielded, would cause light glare. Lighting proposed includes accent lighting in the designated assembly area and a 4,000 watt towable light tower to illuminate the western parking area during the night events. The light generated by the project will be similar to other anticipated resort developments envisioned in the General Plan for the resort District. The General Plan policies recommend limitations on light pollution from outdoor sources. The proposed venue would be responsible for complying with Policy 6.5 of the Land Use and Community Form Element for limiting light pollution and the City Council would continue to make a finding of consistency with this policy as the entertainment permit is required to be renew within a year of approval and renewed again after a term of three years. The General Plan anticipated new light sources typical of urban development projects such as street and parking lot lighting.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to a non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland to nonPage 856 Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 8
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
agricultural use?
Discussion:
a,c) Would the project Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use? Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. The proposed venue is on a property that is not under agricultural production and has not been used for agricultural production. The subject site is zoned R-E, Residential Estate, and not zoned for agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated with regard to agricultural resources or operations. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project will conform with the General Plan Designation of Resort District and the project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the use of the project site for an outdoor event venue would result in no impact and is a use permitted in the City of Coachella Municipal Code.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY – Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? (South Coast Air Basin)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation based on the thresholds in the SCAQMD’s
“CEQA Air Quality Handbook?”
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people based on the information in the

Page 857 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 9
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Project Description?
Discussion:
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than significant impact. The proposed project is located in the Coachella Valley Planning Area of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Consistency with the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin means that a project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and assumptions in the respective plan to achieve the Federal and State air quality standards.

The proposed event venue will result in a land use intensity that is less than what is assumed in the existing General Plan land use for the Resort District with an intensity of 8 du/acre. No construction of new buildings are proposed on-site related to the event venue or are anticipated. Therefore, the project would not induce substantial population growth either directly or indirectly, and would be consistent with the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan employment forecasts for Riverside County. The project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance. All proposed City projects are required to comply with City standards for PM 10. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan in this regard. No mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
No impact. No construction is proposed at the project site and existing on-site building facilities would be used for the event venue. The venue would not generate short-term air quality impacts expected for grading and construction operations as no construction is proposed. No clearing, grading, excavating, and using heavy equipment or trucks creating large quantities of fugitive dust, and fugitive dust (PM10) is proposed.

Pursuant to guidance issued by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, lead agencies are encouraged to analyze potential impacts related to naturally occurring asbestos (NOA). The proposed project is not located in an area where NOA is likely to be present. Therefore impacts would be considered less than significant.
c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Less than Significant impact. The proposed project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 and 403.1 requirements. The proposed project does not propose construction of new facilities that

Page 858 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 10
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
would result in construction related cumulative impacts that would increase nonattainment for criteria pollutants. Therefore, cumulative operational impacts associated with project operations would be less than significant.
d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant impact. Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The project site is in an area with existing uses and there are no sensitive receptors in close proximity. The project does not propose construction of new facilities that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
e) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors.

No construction activity is associated with the project that would generate detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. There would be no impacts to existing adjacent land uses either short-term or long-term.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the

Page 859 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 11
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Discussion:
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No impact. There is no habitat located on the project site. The 8.6 acre project site currently includes one single family residence. Vegetation on-site largely includes minimal ornamental landscaping largely concentrated in the proposed assembly area with turf and date palm trees.

Since the site has been developed/disturbed and suitable habitat and special status species are not expected to occur on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact on habitat for sensitive species.

Page 860 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 12
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
With the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) now in effect, any issues pertaining to biological resources protected under the Endangered Species Act are covered simply by payment of a mitigation fee. As such, there will be less than significant effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service.
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. As previously stated, there are no wetland or riparian habitats or physical features on the project site. The project would have no impact to sensitive natural communities or riparian habitat since none exist on the site. This City participates in the CV Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan, which collects mitigation fees for new development for future land banking of natural communities conservation areas. As such there would be no impact to existing wetland or riparian habitats or physical features.
c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. As no drainages or other features onsite meet the requirements for Water of the US, there is no potential for impacts to resources protected under the Clean Water Act. No on-site paving improvements are proposed for the project, which would modify any existing drainage patterns on-site. Any construction will require compliance with the valley wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, including but not limited to submittal of a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for plan review and a Final WQMP. The site does not contain any sensitive natural communities identified by either the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. There are no federally protected wetlands (as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) on or near the project site. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
No Impact. The site is includes a single family residence, vacant land, and equestrian uses. The properties surrounding the site are a combination of undeveloped commercial and single family residential parcels. There are no wildlife corridors or nursery sites on the property. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife

Page 861 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 13
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
nursery sites because the site is vacant and void of any habitat and vegetation that would provide cover and forage for migrating wildlife species.
e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinance protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The site is not subject to any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. The City does not currently have a tree protection ordinance. The site is not within an identified conservation area of the CV Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project would not conflict with the adopted Coachella Valley Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which includes identified natural communities and habitats for endangered species, potentially endangered species, species of concern and special status species of plants and animals in the region. The site is outside of any sub-area conservation plan, as identified in the MSHCP document. The project would use existing on-site facilities and payment of MSHCP mitigation fees is not anticipated for this project. No impact is anticipated.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Be developed in a sensitive archaeological area as
identified in the City’s General Plan?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5 of CEQA?
c) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§15064.5 of CEQA?
d) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic

Page 862 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 14
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
feature?
e) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
f) Other:

Discussion:
a) Be developed in a sensitive archaeological area as identified in the City’s General Plan? No Impact. There are no officially listed historic sites or features in the vicinity of the project site as indicated in the General Plan EIR, Figure 4.4-1. The project site has been a developed single family residential site. The proposed use of an event venue would not have a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
No Impact. The City’s General Plan Conservation Element identifies archaeological sites that have been discovered throughout the City of Coachella. The site has been previously developed with a single family residence. No ground disturbing activity is proposed that would disturb potential cultural resources and require archaeological monitoring. c) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
No Impact. Based on the City’s General Plan the site is not located in any known historical areas of the city. In impact to a historical resource is anticipated. d) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. The City of Coachella is located in an area that is near the shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla in the Coachella Valley. Research into the paleontological sensitivity for the project area noted that there is a potential for fossil resources, but only below the recent alluvial sediments associated with the lake shore deposits. The likelihood for identifying fossils within the project area is considered to be moderate to high, assuming the older alluvium deposits are impacted.

Page 863 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 15
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
No grading within the project area is anticipated with the use of the subject site that would warrant monitoring by a qualified paleontological monitor. e) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. There are no known human remains on the site, no existing cemeteries, and no suspected cemeteries either on the site or adjacent properties. As such, no impacts to these resources are anticipated.
f) No Impact. There are no other archaeological, historic, or paleontological impacts anticipated with development of the project.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
a) Involve earth movement (cut and/or fill) based on
information included in the Project Description
Form?
b) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death?
c) Be located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zone?
d) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
e) Be located within an area subject to landslides,
mudslides, subsidence, or other similar hazards as
identified in the City’s General Plan?
f) Be located within an area subject to liquefaction as identified in the City’s General Plan?
g) Modify any unique physical feature based on a site

Page 864 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 16
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
survey/evaluation?
h) Result in erosion, dust, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, fill, or other construction
activities?
i) Other:

Discussion:
a) Involve earth movement (cut and/or fill) based on information included in the Project Description Form?
No Impact. The proposed Entertainment Permit involved the use of existing facilities at the subject site with parking and assembly area as an event venue and does not require any planned grading and will not result in any significant quantity of earth movement. b) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death?
Less than Significant Impact. There are no known geological constraints on the site that expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects including the risk of loss, injury, or death. The project site is subject to liquefaction during major seismic events due to the presence of groundwater at depths ranging from 10 to 20 feet below the surface. The event venue assembly area largely consists of outdoor assembly area and existing small building structures for a kitchen, stage and bathroom.
c) Be located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone? No Impact. There is no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone either on the site. The closest fault is the San Andreas Fault, which is located approximately 1,500 feet of the site and estimated to generate a maximum moment magnitude of 7.4. Based on the known seismic conditions in the region, all development on the site would have to be designed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4. No development is proposed on-site that would require a building permit and compliance with the Uniform Building Code.

Page 865 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 17
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
d) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? No Impact. No potential soil erosion and the loss of topsoil is anticipated with the use of the site as an event venue as there no site grading and construction anticipated and the use of the site would utilize existing facilities. The City is subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has delegated the State Water Resources Control Board to monitor permitee compliance with all NPDES permit requirements. The State Water Resources Control Board has in turn, allocated these responsibilities to the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The City of Coachella is under the jurisdiction of the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board.

As the project proposed no new grading or construction, then it would not be required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which covers post-construction water quality protection through the use of site design, source control, and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs).
e) Be located within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence, or other similar hazards as identified in the City’s General Plan?
No Impact. The project site is substantially flat and there are no hillsides either on or adjacent to the site that could impact the project. The site is not located in an area that is subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence, or other similar hazards as identified by the City of Coachella General Plan. There will be no landslide, mudslide, or subsidence impacts with the project. f) Be located within an area subject to liquefaction as identified in the City’s General Plan? No Impact. The City’s General Plan identifies the project site as being located in an area where groundwater can be encountered at depths ranging from 10 to 20 feet below the surface. The presence of somewhat loose condition of isolated silty sand layers along with groundwater the site is subject to liquefaction. The project does not involve the construction of any habitable structures. Therefore, the impacts related to geologic condition would be less than significant. g) Modify any unique physical feature based on a site survey/evaluation? No Impact. The site is substantially flat and vacant and there are no unique physical features on the property. The site slopes gently in a southeasterly direction. The project will have no impact to any unique physical features since there are none present. h) Result in erosion, dust, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, fill, or other construction activities?

Page 866 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 18
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
No Impact. The project will not result in any significant erosion, dust, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, fill, or other construction activities because the does not propose any grading or construction that would require it to install and maintain dust and erosion control measures during grading or construction during the life of the project. i) No Impact. There are no other geologic conditions associated with the site that would be impacted by or impact the project.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on
the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion:
a) a & b)Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less than Significant. Global climate change is caused by an accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The proposed project will generate greenhouse gases during construction and operation.

No construction is proposed in associated with the project. Emissions from vehicles on the roadways already exist and are not anticipated to increase significantly as a result of the proposed project. The project will have minimal impacts GHC emissions attributed to added traffic from employees and customers to the project.

The proposed project does not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The applicant is required to comply with General Plan policies for reduction of greenhouse gases in the Climate Action Plan such as reductions of emissions from generation of solid waste and reducing the number and length of vehicle trips.

Page 867 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 19
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would
the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?

Page 868 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 20
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wild lands?
i) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
No Impact. The operation of the proposed event venue involves no grading or construction that could involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Small quantities of household hazardous waste would be expected, but not at large quantities or concentrations.

The City’s General Plan Environmental Hazards & Safety Element contains goals and policies requiring the safe and responsible disposal of all hazardous and/or toxic wastes in compliance with existing federal, state and county regulations; therefore, the project would not create a hazard to the public or environment through the use or transport of hazardous materials. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
No impact. The project does not propose any uses which would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The event venue operation will introduce very small quantities of household hazardous waste to a site. The City’s General Plan establishes protocols and guidelines to ensure household hazardous waste is managed and disposed of properly. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through the release of hazardous materials.
c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than significant impact. There are no existing or proposed schools located within onequarter mile of the proposed project site. The project will have no hazard impact to schools.

Page 869 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 21
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Less than significant Impact. The property is not listed on a site for hazardous materials and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan of a public airport or public use airport that would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area based on the General Plan. The Jacqueline Cochran Airport, a general aviation public airport operated by the County of Riverside, is approximately six miles south of the site and the project site is not within an Airport Influence Boundary Zone. The project would not be exposed to any hazards that may be associated with airport operations at either airport or conflict with land management policies of the RCALUCP.
f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The entertainment permit and on-site circulation has been reviewed by the Riverside County Sherriff’s Department and the Fire Department and do not require any special mitigation measures. There will be no adverse impacts on emergency response or evacuation plans stipulated by the City of Coachella or other agencies. The project will not decrease or impact the ability of Avenue 44 to serve as an emergency route in case of an on-site emergency.
h) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The project site is not located within any designated extreme or moderate fire hazard area based on the Coachella General Plan. There are no wildland areas within the project vicinity that would create a significant fire hazard. Wild land fires would not have an impact to the project.
b) There are no other hazards that would occur with development of the project as proposed.

Page 870 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 22
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, or substantially
increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner, which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff,
such as from areas of material storage, vehicle or
equipment maintenance (including washing or
detailing), waste handling, hazardous materials
handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks,
or other outdoor areas?

Page 871 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 23
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area
as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map? (Panel No. 7940)
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures, which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or
dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
k) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? No impact. The project will be required to meet and comply with all applicable Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements and standards for the discharge of surface water from the site. Potential water quality impacts from erosion and sedimentation would be controlled through implementation of standard erosion control measures as specified in the required Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of a local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?

Page 872 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 24
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Less than significant impact. Implementation of this project will result in the consumption of additional amounts of groundwater through event use and for irrigation of landscaped areas.

Groundwater has historically been the principal source of water supply in the Coachella Valley.

This is supplemented through imported water from the Colorado River, and natural runoff from surrounding mountains. The project lies within the area of benefit of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Replenishment Program. Groundwater production within the Lower Whitewater Basin area of benefit is subject to a replenishment assessment in accordance with the State Water Code. The facility would consume water during event activities during limited hours during the day and the use of water supplies would be less than 24 hour uses anticipated for the site as a Resort District use, which includes residences at a density of 8 dwelling units an acre.

Consequently, the proposed project itself is not anticipated to deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge and shall comply with the necessary conservation requirements.
c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite?
No impact. The project will no alter existing drainage conditions on-site and will utilize existing parking, drive aisles and building pads. The existing improvements on the site involve largely permeable surfaces including the turf assembly area and permeable driveway and parking areas.

There are no streams or rivers within the vicinity of the project. Project impacts with regard to drainage and potential erosion or siltation would be less than significant. d) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? No Impact. The project does not involve grading that could significantly alter the existing drainage. Implementation of the proposed land uses will result in an increase in impermeable surfaces onsite which has the potential to result in an increase in surface water runoff and reduce the absorption rate.
e) Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
No Impact. The project will not create or contribute runoff water that will exceed the capacity of the existing or planned storm water drainage systems for the area. This portion of the City does not currently have an underground storm water drainage system. The event venue area of the subject site largely consists of permeable areas. Impervious surfaces include the existing building pads for the restroom, stage, and kitchen. Therefore, no impact to existing or planned water

Page 873 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 25
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
drainage systems in the vicinity would be affected. Any required on-site retention system will be designed to have capacity to detain and discharge overflow surface water runoff by the project without impacting downstream properties.
f) Would the project otherwise degrade water quality?
No impact. The event venue does not proposed construction of new facilities that would involve use of heavy equipment during site construction and operation that would have the potential to discharge contaminants that could potentially contaminate groundwater quality. The project will not substantially degrade water quality because less than significant impacts are anticipated. g) Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary if Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. h) Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
No Impact. The project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary if Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. i) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. The project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary if Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. The East Side Dike is located 500 feet north of the project site and runs northwest-southeast. The dike is designed to provide protection to the All-American Canal which passes in a southeasterly direction through the City. The project would have no impact on the dike or canal. j) Would the project be susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. The project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The project site as well as the surrounding land are substantially flat and would not be impacted by a mudflow. The project site is located more than one hundred miles from the ocean and would not be impacted by a tsunami. The project will not be impacted by any of these events. k) No Impact. There are no other flooding or hydrology events that will impact the project.

Page 874 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 26
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy,
or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project (including, but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program,
or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan?
Discussion:
a) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project site consists of residential estate land with one house on the property.

The properties surrounding the site consist of vacant land, agricultural properties, and sporadic residential dwellings on adjoining properties to the north and south. The project will have no impact with regards to physically dividing an established community. b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
No Impact. The proposed project would allow for the development of commercial buildings on the site that would serve the retail and office needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. The General Plan designates the project site as Resort District which is intended for destination and specialized entertainment uses. The proposed event venue would be consistent with the allowed uses and the intent of the Resort District. Official Zoning Map designates the project site as R-E, Residential Estate. The Coachella Municipal Code allows for the issuance of Entertainment

Page 875 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 27
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Establishment Permit by the City Council and the City Council may apply conditions of approval for the operation of the use including hours of operation, traffic control and noise control. c) Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
No Impact. The project will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan because the site is not located within a conservation area of the Coachella Valley Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
c) Be located in a Mineral Resource Zone as adopted
by the State Mining and Geology Board and
identified in the City’s General Plan?
Discussion:
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. There are no known mineral resources on the site that are considered to be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The project will have no impact to mineral resources.
b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?

Page 876 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 28
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
No Impact. Based on the General Plan the project site is not located in any designated locally important mineral resource areas. There are no mineral resources that are being mined either on the site or any of the surrounding properties. The project will have no impact to mineral resources.
c) Would the poroject be located in a Mineral Resource Zone as adopted by the State Mining and Geology Board and identified in the City’s General Plan? No Impact. The site is not located in a mineral resource zone adopted by the State Mining and Geology Board as being significantly important as a mineral resource site. There are no important minerals from a state standpoint on the site.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XII. NOISE – Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
City’s General Plan or Development Code, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or Airport Influence Area, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?

Page 877 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 29
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
g) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant Impact. Existing land use in the project vicinity consists of agricultural, vacant, and residential land. The nearest residential neighborhood receptor is the Lodge Four Seasons at Terra Lago (55+ Community) at 1,674 feet from the site. The City of Coachella has exterior noise standards as shown below in Table A from the Coachella Municipal Code.

Table A: Exterior Noise Standards
Land Use Time Period Noise Level (dBA)
Residential (All Zones) 6:00 am-10:00 pm 55
10:00 pm-6:00 pm 45
Commercial (All Zones) 6:00 am-10:00 pm 65
10:00 pm – 6:00 pm 55
A noise analysis was prepared for the proposed use (LSA Noise Analysis for Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue in Coachella). The noise analysis was prepared to determine the maximum noise level that can be generated by the event venue to be consistent with the City of Coachella Municipal Code noise standards by identifying the noise impact to existing receptors that include The Lodge Four Seasons at Terra Lago in the City of Indio, a date farm to the north in the City of Indio, Coachella Lakes RV Resort located east in the City of Coachella, and Love’s Travel Stop located to the Southeast in the City of Coachella. The analysis concluded that the even venue could generate a maximum noise level of 85.5 continuous sound level in A-weighted decibels at a distance of 50 feet from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm and 75.5 decibels at a distance of 50 feet from 10 pm to 6 am to maintain compliance with the City’s 10-minute noise standards of 55 dBA from 6:00 am to 10 pm and 45 dBA from 10:00 pm to 6 am. The noise analysis did not factor the

Page 878 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 30
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
directionality of speakers or any shielding by the event venue operators. The speakers would be directed in a southeast direction from the stage area, minimizing directionality of noise to residences to the North.

The City of Coachella also has General Plan standards are shown in Figure 4.10-3 of the General Plan EIR. For interior habitable spaces of single-family and multiple-family residences, the noise level limit is 45 dB CNEL which is consistent with state standards. Since normal noise attenuation within residential structures with closed windows is about 20 dB, an exterior noise exposure of 65 dBA CNEL allows the interior standard to be met without any specialized structural attenuation (dual paned windows, etc.).

Existing noise levels throughout the project area would result from vehicular sources on the surrounding roadways. Because of the rural nature of the surrounding land use and associated low traffic generation, current noise levels are somewhat low at the project site. Elevated noise levels occur in close proximity to Avenue 44 and Dillon Road where noise levels reach 70 dbA.

The project has the potential to result in short-term noise impacts due to noise related to entertainment related events. Noise impacts are considered significant if they expose persons to levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan as discussed above. The event venue would be required to comply with the City’s noise ordinance as afformentioned and would therefore result in impacts that would be less than significant. b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less than Significant Impact. The project will not generate vibration and groundbourne noise as the project does not propose construction associated with soil excavation and compaction and the operation of construction equipment. Automobiles and delivery trucks using the site during operation of the facility would not generate excessive groundbourne vibration or noise levels. c) Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Less than Significant Impact. The project will temporarily increase ambient noise in the vicinity during event venue activities on Saturdays from 12:00 pm to 12:00 am and when amplified music is played from 7:00 pm to 12:00 am, but is not expected to result in significant impacts to sensitive receptors as the event venue is required to comply with the City of Coachella noise ordinance.
d) Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?

Page 879 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 31
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Less than Significant Impact. The project will increase the ambient noise level in the area during event venue activities on Saturdays from 12:00 pm to 12:00 am, particularly when amplified music is played from 7:00 pm to 12:00 am. The project is not anticipated to have a significant impact due to the event venue that would operate at noise levels at or below thresholds identified by the LSA noise analysis in Table C.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The project site is located approximately 6 miles northwest of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a general aviation public airport operated by the County of Riverside. The project site is not within any Airport Influence Area Boundary for this airport. The project will not expose residents to noise impacts generated by the daily operations at either airport. There will be no impact from airport influence areas on the project. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The site is approximately 6 miles northwest of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, a general aviation public airport operated by the County of Riverside. There will be no impact to a private airstrip.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?

Page 880 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 32
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Discussion:
a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes or businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than Significant Impact. The project proposes does not include construction of any habitable structures, which would induce substantial population growth. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. There is currently one house on the site that would continue to be used by the property owners with the operation of the event venue. Therefore, the project will not displace existing housing and will have less than significant impact to existing housing.

C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. There is currently one house on the site that would continue to be used as a single family residence. No new construction is proposed with the proposed event venue that displace people that will necessitate replacement housing elsewhere.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of

Page 881 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 33
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:

Fire protection, including medical aid?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational facilities?
Other governmental services or public facilities?
b) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services:

Police and Fire- Less than significant. The subject property is within the service area of the Coachella Fire Department. The City of Coachella currently contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection services and emergency medical services. Station 79, located at 1377 Sixth Street in Coachella, serves the incorporated City. To ensure adequate fire protection services in an emergency, the City of Coachella maintains a mutual aid agreement with surrounding cities and County jurisdictions. The proposed project would result in additional structures which would increase the need for fire services. The Coachella Police Department serves the City and unincorporated County areas in Coachella’s SOI and is served under contract by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, based out of their office at 86625 Airport Blvd Boulevard in Indio. The proposed project will result in a marginal increase in police and fire protection services.

Page 882 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 34
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
The applicant will be subject to public safety impact fees and the project’s contribution will reduce potential impacts to police services/facilities to a less than significant level.

Schools – No Impact. The project will not generate population growth and therefore would not place a new demand on schools.

Parks – No Impact. The project does not generate population growth and would not place new demands on existing parks or require development of additional parkland.

Other Governmental Services – The project would not increase the need for or impact any additional governmental services.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
c) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
No Impact. The project will not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks because no new residential buildings are being proposed.

Page 883 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 35
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The project does not propose any recreational facilities or require expansion of recreational facilities and will therefore have no impact on existing or future recreational facilities in Coachella.
c) There are no other potential recreation impacts with the project.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC – Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or
policy establishing measures of effectiveness for
the performance of the circulation system, taking
into account all modes of transportation n
including mass transit and non-motorized travel
and relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle
paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not limited
to, level of service standards and travel demand
measures, or other standards established by the
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?

Page 884 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 36
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
h) Other:

Discussion:
a) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Less than Significant Impact. The project is the operation on an event venue that would operate between 12 pm to 12 am on Saturdays and serve a maximum of 200 guests. Access to the site would occur from Avenue 44 which is a Primary Arterial which at full construction would accommodate 4 vehicular lanes and bike lanes. The existing Avenue 44 is improved with two vehicular lanes and an improved roadway about 25 feet wide with unpaved shoulders. The northside of Avenue 44 is in the City of Indio and the southside of Avenue 44 is part of the City of Coachella. Vehicular access to the subject site would occur from a 751 foot long driveway that accommodates stacking for 37 vehicles. Parking is provided to the north, west, east and south of the event venue assembly area that can accommodate 65 vehicles and an are for 60 parking spaces for overflow parking. The limited timeframe for events at the venue including appropriate number of vehicle stacking on-site would pose a minimal impact to traffic on Avenue 44 or for the intersection of Avenue 44 and Dillon Road. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less than Significant Impact. The project is the operation on an event venue that would operate between 12 pm to 12 am on Saturdays and serve a maximum of 200 guests. The project would

Page 885 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 37
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
increase traffic on roadways in the project vicinity. The limited timeframe for events at the venue including appropriate number of vehicle stacking on-site would pose a minimal impact to traffic on Avenue 44 or for the intersection of Avenue 44 and Dillon Road. The event venue will operate with a security guard directing traffic from Avenue 44 and two parking attendants on-site at onsite parking areas. c) Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The project will not increase and impact safety risks due to the location of the site in relation to area airports.
d) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves of dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed event venue does not propose any sharp curves or dangerous intersections and would utilize existing street improvements. All access points for the event venue will occur from Avenue 44 and the site includes a substantial driveway of 751 feet that accommodates stacking of 37 vehicles to the parking areas of the event venue. e) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The project will have adequate emergency access to the site from Avenue 44 for emergency vehicles, including fire trucks, police vehicles, and ambulances. The project will not eliminate or impact emergency access to the site.
f) Would the project result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact. The proposed event venue would be designed to include on-site parking consistent with the parking standards of the Coachella Municipal Code for commercial facilities. The project will not impact parking.
g) Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Less than Significant Impact. The neighborhood commercial site would be located on Avenue 44.

Sun Line Transit Agency provides bus service to the City of Coachella. The City of Coachella has determined that a need exists for Bus Shelter and Bus Stop Safety Zone improvements as new development expands. Due to the intermittent nature of the event venue, bus service or alternative transportation modes would not be required for the site. h) There are no other transportation related issues or impacts associated with the project.

Page 886 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 38
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL – Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the significance of
a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object
with cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) No Impact. The project does not involve and grading or ground disturbance that would impact a tribal cultural resource or any other historical resource eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources.
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change to a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1. In applying the

Page 887 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 39
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

No Impact. The project does not involve and grading or ground disturbance that would impact a tribal cultural resource as it involves the operation of an event venue on a site with existing site improvements.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste
disposal needs?

Page 888 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 40
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
h) Other:

Discussion:

A, e) Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Less than significant impact. The project site is located within Coachella Sanitary District’s (CSD) service area. The proposed project will be required to comply with all requirements of the City of Coachella relating to sewer system connection. The applicant will be required to pay sewer connection fees at the rate set by the District which serves to offset any additional conveyance and treatment requirements. Treatment of the additional residential effluent from the project is anticipated to be routine and would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB.
b) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects?
No impact. The proposed project involves the use of existing facilities for the purpose of an event facility and therefore there would be no new requirements to connect to existing City water and wastewater infrastructure to provide the necessary construction and domestic water/sewer needs for the project. The future development project will be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and other requirements of Coachella Water Authority (CWA) and CSD in order to provide water and sewer services to the site. Service requirements may include, but are not limited to, upgrades, modifications, replacement, and abandonment of existing facilities. c) Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No impact. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) is responsible for providing regional flood control protection. The operation of the site as an event venue would not involve the construction of new impervious surfaces which has the potential to increase the need for new or

Page 889 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 41
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
expanded storm water facilities. The project would not require new or expanded infrastructure; therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No impact. The Coachella Water Authority will serve the project’s domestic water needs.

Implementation of this project will result in the consumption of additional amounts of water through domestic usage at residences. The Coachella Valley, as a region, has experienced groundwater overdraft in recent years. Typically, the water agencies require new projects to apply water conservation practices to the maximum extent practical including water efficient plumbing fixtures which comply with Title 20, California Administrative Code, Section 1604(f), the installation of drought tolerant plants in landscaped areas and the use of reclaimed water for irrigation when available. Impacts are considered less than significant with application of General Plan Policies.
f) Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
Less than Significant Impact. The solid waste that is generated during construction activities of the proposed project will be collected by Burrtec Waste Disposal who has an agreement with the City to collect trash and haul it to the Edom Hill Landfill in Cathedral City. This landfill has permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs without significantly impacting its life expectancy. The City has an adopted Source Reduction and Recycling Element that requires recycling.
g) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The project will be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The project will not impact any statutes or regulations that relate to solid waste compliance because the solid waste generated by the project will be collected and recycled as required the City’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element.
h) There are no other public utilities associated with or potentially impacted by the project.

Page 890 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 42
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Discussion:
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact. There are no known sensitive biological resources on the site as the area has been previously disturbed by previous and existing agricultural operations. The site is subject to the Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) mitigation fee program that will require collection of fees prior to issuance of grading permits. However, the site is not located within a sub-area conservation plan and can be developed to its full potential.

Page 891 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

INITIAL STUDY
Rancho Escondido Event Venue Page 43
Negative Declaration –July, 2022
There are no historical buildings or known sensitive archaeological resources on the site. The project will not degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less than significant impact. The proposed project is the operation of an existing residential and equestrian site for an event venue. Other cumulative impacts may be identified in the categories of population growth, use of resources, demand for services, and physical changes to the natural environment. No cumulative effects related to fugitive dust emissions during project construction, discovery of unknown buried archaeological and/or paleontological resources, and water quality impacts from erosion and sedimentation is anticipated for the use of the site as an event venue.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than significant impact. The project would have less than significant environmental effects; however, these effects would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings (please refer to previously discussed items elsewhere in this Initial Study). The City’s General Plan identifies goals, policies, and implementation measures which require the City to participate in various regional programs designed to mitigate direct and indirect impacts associated with construction and operation of their approved development projects. Compliance with these goals and policies on a project level will ensure no significant direct or indirect effect on human beings.

Page 892 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF COACHELLA

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

INITIAL STUDY

Page 44 ends

REFERENCES. The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development Services Department.

1. City of Coachella General Plan

2. City of Coachella General Plan EIR

3. City of Coachella General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Maps

4. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map

5. LSA Noise Analysis for 85321 Avenue 44 (Prepared June 8, 2022)

Page 893 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79 Exhibit B
Exhibit B - Resolution No. 2022-79

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 22-02 RANCHO ESCONDIDA EVENT VENUE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 22-02:

1. Entertainment Permit No. 22-02 is an approval for an entertainment venue where alcohol may be served. This approval is based on the site plan submitted for the proposed project. Violation of any of the conditions of approval shall be cause for revocation of the Entertainment Permit No. 22-02.

2. Any break in service, meaning the closure of the event venue for a period of 180 consecutive days, will result in the expiration of this Entertainment Permit.

3. The applicant will agree to defend and indemnify the City of Coachella against all claims, actions, damages, and losses, including attorney fees and costs, in the event that anyone files legal challenges to the approval of this project on the basis of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The applicant shall execute a standard indemnification agreement subject to review by the City Attorney before any event is held subject to this permit.

4. The use shall meet the standards within the limits established by the Coachella Municipal Code as related to emissions of noise, odor, dust, vibration, wastes, fumes, or any public nuisances arising or occurring incidental to the establishment or operation.

5. The applicant shall comply with Noise Control standards of the Municipal Code (Chapter

7.04). Any amplified sound equipment shall be oriented to reduce noise impacts off-site with consultation from the Code Enforcement Manager. The applicant shall utilize a noise decibel meter on-site during events to monitor noise levels for compliance with the City Noise Ordinance. If noise nuisances are observed by the Chief of Police or Code Enforcement Manager, the City Manager or designee may require that the applicant use electronic noise sensors on-site for all events and that noise measurement data from the noise sensors be available to the Code Enforcement Manager.

6. Hours of operation for event venue may be from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., Saturdays. The City reserves the right to modify the hours of business operation after 12 months of continuous Entertainment establishment use has lapsed, based on information provided by the Coachella Police regarding calls for service.

7. The applicant shall comply with all requirements imposed by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

8. A maximum of 200 guests are permitted on-site for events at any given time. The applicant shall maintain a count of all event participants on-site at all times during events. Event counts for concerts shall be maintained by event staff at the main entrance and made available upon request by the Coachella Police or City Staff.

Page 894 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79 Exhibit B

9. The applicant shall obtain all other applicable permits, if required, from the appropriate agencies (i.e. Fire Department, Building Division, Sheriffs Department, Department of Public Health etc.).

10. Any large scale events that involves more than 200 guests shall require consultation with the City Manager or designee to determine if a special event permit will be required through the City Manager's office. Said application and applicable fees shall be submitted a minimum of five (5) working days, not including days when City Hall is closed, prior to the event.

11. Any signs displayed shall comply with the City of Coachella Sign Ordinance.

12. Signs advertising brands of alcoholic beverages or the availability of alcoholic beverages at the subject site shall not be visible from the exterior of the building or anywhere off the site.

13. Licensed security guards shall be required for events with 50 guests or more or when alcohol is served. These guards must possess State of California guard cards issues through the California Department of Consumer Affairs. Additional guards shall be used as needed to adequately patrol the parking areas. The City Manager, Code Enforcement Manager or Chief of Police may modify the entertainment permit security plan as deemed necessary to preserve the safety and welfare of guests and the public.

14. The following preventative measures shall be undertaken to reduce the potential for alcoholrelated problems:
 Food service shall remain available during all hours of operation;  Taxicab phone numbers shall be posted in visible locations at all times in the area(s) where alcohol is served;
 All employees selling or serving alcohol shall be required to participate in an alcohol management training program prior to the operation of selling/serving alcohol; and  The availability of a variety of non-alcoholic beverages shall be made known and offered to customers.

15. Management shall patrol the business premises, parking areas, and the surrounding vicinity during the entertainment venue operation and until patrons have left the parking area after operation hours. Management shall ensure that no littering, loitering, or consumption of alcohol occurs in and around the property.

16. No Parking is permitted to occur on Avenue 44 or on the “Night Owl Blvd” driveway and shall be strictly enforced by the applicant/operator.

17. Any and all weapons shall be prohibited at the premises or on the parking lot of the premises except by those individuals lawfully permitted to possess such.

18. The Chief of Police shall have the authority and power to temporarily close the establishment when it becomes apparent that a situation exists wherein there is a probability that the general welfare and safety of the patrons or of the public may be in jeopardy. If closed under this

Page 895 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79 Exhibit B
condition, the premises will not be allowed to reopen before the beginning of regular business hours on the date following the closure.

19. The applicant shall comply with Municipal Code requirements of Chapter 5.24.

20. The applicant shall employ the use of hand-held metal detectors at all entrances if deemed necessary by the Chief of Police to protect the safety and general welfare of patrons or of the public.

21. Entertainment Establishment Permit No. 22-02 shall be valid for 12 months commencing on the first day of the operation. A request for renewal must be submitted by the applicant in order to extend the term of the Permit after the initial term of 12 months has lapsed, at which time the City Council will review compliance with the conditions of approval and consider granting up to a 36-month renewal of the entertainment permit. Relinquishment of the entertainment permit will require an amendment to this resolution, subject to review by the City Council.

22. Any violation of the above conditions may result in the issuance of citations and fines, and may result in revocation of the Entertainment Establishment Permit.

23. If determined necessary by the Chief of Police or City Manager, the permittee shall implement and maintain a system by which the permittee separately identifies each and every adult in the entertainment establishment so as to distinguish each adult from any and all minors within the entertainment establishment in the service of alcohol. At a minimum, such system of adult identification shall require the permittee to place a bracelet on either hand of each adult in the entertainment establishment. In addition, the Chief of Police is hereby authorized to require other methods and procedures to be implemented and maintained by any permittee to assure compliance with the requirement that each adult remain separately identified from any minor at the entertainment establishment.

24. ADA accessible restrooms shall be provided and available to use by all guests on-site during events and shall require inspection by the Building Official prior to commencement of events under this entertainment permit.

25. All structures, including stages, tenants, cabanas, and bleachers shall be installed, used and taken down per the engineered specifications stamped by a licensed engineer and on file with the City of Coachella.

26. The applicant shall ensure adequate dust control measures are in place to the satisfaction of the Code Enforcement Manager and the City Engineer. The City Manager, Code Enforcement Manager, or City Engineer may require additional dust control measures as may deemed necessary.

27. On-site event lighting shall be directed away from vehicle and pedestrian traffic on Avenue 44 and away from surrounding properties. Event operations shall include protocols to avoid light glare onto adjacent properties.

Page 896 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79 Exhibit B
Fire Department Conditions:

28. Tents and Membrane Structures - Tents in excess of 400 square feet shall not be erected for any purpose without first obtaining approval and a permit from the Office of the Fire Marshal.

29. Temporary Special Event Structures - Temporary special event structures in excess of 400 square feet shall not be erected for any purpose without first obtaining approval and a permit from the Office of the Fire Marshall and the Riverside County Building and Safety Division.

30. Vendor and food concession distribution - The placement and use of cooking appliance shall be approved by the fire code official. Portable fire extinguishers shall be available for cooking operations.

31. Hazardous Materials - The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials including liquefied petroleum gas, flammable and combustible liquids will require a permit from the Office of the Fire Marshall.

Engineering Conditions:

32. Night Owl Blvd is a private road easement along the westerly property line of the subject property. All activities proposed on the site shall not obstruct or block Night Owl Blvd from access to neighboring properties that retain access and utility easement rights along the private roadway easement.

33. Based on Survey records of the subject parcel, a non compliant lot split may have occurred in the past which has resulted in non-conforming lots adjacent to the subject property. The property owner shall submit a TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP in compliance with the Subdivision Map act and City of Coachella Ordinances. In particular, the map shall address access and utility easement rights to all adjacent properties that utilize Night Owl Lane as a primary access point to Avenue 44. The TENTAIVE PARCEL MAP shall be submitted and all applicable fees be paid for the review and submittal prior to issuance of the conditional use permit for special events.

Final Map

34. The Final Map shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act and City of Coachella Subdivision Ordinance. The Final map shall be submitted within one year of the issuance of the conditional use permit for special events. Failure to submit the final map within the one year time frame could result in a revocation of the conditional use permit. The tentative parcel map shall remain valid for a period that is consistent with state laws and city ordinances regulating subdivisions at the time of approval.

35. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the applicant shall resolve potential CVWD issues related to existing tile drains or irrigation mains located within the tract boundary or along the streets adjacent to the tract. If necessary, tile drains and irrigation lines shall be relocated and easement documents prepared for the new location of any such lines. The easement shall be shown on the final map. Plans for the tile drain or irrigation relocation shall be submitted to CVWD for approval and a copy of the plans shall be submitted to the City for evaluation

Page 897 ends

Item 17.

Resolution No. 2022-79 Exhibit B
regarding possible conflict with City facilities. The applicant shall submit to the City approved copies of any such relocation plans.

36. Prepare and record necessary drainage easements, access easements and utility easements to implement the project in accordance with drainage law and site conditions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to approval of the Final Maps.

37. Internal roads shall be complete prior to final occupancy of any adjacent house.

38. The applicant shall pay all necessary plan check, permit and inspection fees. Fees will be determined when plans are submitted to the City Engineering Department for plan check.

39. Sewer & Water Improvement Plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for engineering plan check and City Engineer approval.

40. Applicant shall construct all off-site and on-site water and sewer improvements and any other incidental works necessary to complete the improvements. Size and location of sewer and water improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer.

Page 898 ends

Item 17.

Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Vicinity Map
¯
Site
Avenue 44
320 160 0 320 640 960 1,280
Feet

Page 899 ends

Item 17.

Page 900 ends

Item 17.

Page 901 ends

Item 17.

Page 902 ends

Item 17.

Page 903 ends

Item 17.

Page 904 ends

Item 17.

Page 905 ends

Item 17.

Page 906 ends

Item 17.

Page 907 ends

Item 17.

Page 908 ends

Item 17.

Page 909 ends

Item 17.

Page 910 ends

Item 17.

Page 911 ends

Item 17.

Page 912 ends

Item 17.

Page 913 ends

Item 17.

Page 914 ends

Item 17.

Page 915 ends

Item 17.

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, California  92614     949.553.0666     www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 8, 2022
TO: Maggie Lopez, Rancho Escondido Horse Boarding and Venue FROM: Jason Lui, Associate/Senior Noise Specialist
SUBJECT: Noise Analysis for Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue in Coachella, California

INTRODUCTION
This Noise Analysis Memorandum has been prepared to analyze and determine the maximum noise level that can be generated from the wedding and party venue at 85321 Avenue 44 in Coachella, California, based on the City of Coachella (City) Municipal Code noise standards.

PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is south of Avenue 44 between Harrison Street and Terra Lago Parkway at 85321 Avenue 44 in Coachella, California. The project site is just south of the Coachella’s northern boundary. The outdoor wedding venue is on the western half of the property, which consists of the outdoor event space and vehicle parking for events. The project location is shown on Figure 1 (all figures attached).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is a wedding venue that will host weddings and party events, which will include a stage and cabana planned for amplified sound and live music. Amenities for the wedding venue include a stage and cabana, a dance floor, a reception area, a kitchen, restrooms, and vehicle parking. Events will start in the evenings and end by 1:00 a.m. Figure 2 shows the event space’s site plan on the property.

SURROUNDING LAND USE
Land uses immediately adjacent to the project site include vacant land and residential property to the north and the south. Vacant land is immediately adjacent to the east and the west of the project site. The residential property immediately adjacent to the north is not considered in this noise analysis because it is vacant and abandoned. The residential property immediately adjacent to the south is also not considered in this noise analysis because it is occupied by family of the facility owner and is associated with the project site. The closest residential and commercial uses surrounding the project site beyond the immediately adjacent properties evaluated in this noise analysis are listed in Table A along with their distances from the stage and cabana to the property

Page 916 ends

Item 17.
6/8/22 (P:\RNC2201\Product\Noise Analysis Memorandum.docx)   2 line. As shown in Table A, residential uses to the north and northwest are in Indio, whereas residential uses to the northeast and commercial uses to the southeast are in Coachella. Figure 3 shows the location of the surrounding land uses beyond the immediately adjacent properties.

Table A: Receptors and Their Distance to the Project Site Receptor No. Land Use City Description Direction Distance (ft) R‐1 Residence Indio The Lodge Four Seasons at
Terra Lago (55+ Community) North 1,674
R‐2 Residence Indio Date Farm Northwest 1,740
R‐3 Residence Coachella Coachella Lakes RV Resort Northeast 4,146 R‐4 Commercial Coachella Love’s Travel Stop Southeast 3,326 Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).
ft = foot/feet

REGULATORY SETTING
City of Coachella
Municipal Code
Section 8.40.050 of the City’s Municipal Code1 states that it shall be unlawful for any person to make, continue, or cause to be made or continued, within the city limits any disturbing excessive or offensive noise or vibration which causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area or that is plainly audible at a distance greater than 50 feet (ft) from the sources point for any purpose regardless of whether an objective measurement by sound level meter is involved. The 10‐minute average sound level limits shown in Table B shall apply to fixed noise sources, unless otherwise specifically indicated.

Table B: Exterior Noise Standards
Land Use Time Period Noise Level
(dBA Leq – 10 minute)
Residential (All Zones) 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 55
10:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 45
Commercial (All Zones) 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 65
10:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 55
Source: City of Coachella Municipal Code (2021).

Note: If the measured ambient noise level exceeds the applicable limit as noted in the table, the allowable average sound level shall be the ambient noise level. The ambient noise level shall be measured when the alleged noise violation sources are not operating. The sound level limit between two zoning districts shall be measured at the higher allowable district. dBA = A‐weighted decibels
Leq = equivalent continuous sound level
1 City of Coachella. 2021. Municipal Code. July 26.

Page 917 ends

Item 17.
6/8/22 (P:\RNC2201\Product\Noise Analysis Memorandum.docx)   3

NOISE ANALYSIS
Table C lists the surrounding land uses beyond the immediately adjacent properties along with the City’s noise standards, the distance from the stage and cabana to the property line of off‐site land uses, distance attenuation, and the maximum noise level that can be generated at a distance of 50 ft from the noise source. A noise level reduction of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source was used for the point source distance attenuation.

CONCLUSION
As shown in Table C, the wedding venue can generate a maximum noise level of 85.5 continuous sound level in A‐weighted decibels (dBA Leq) at a distance of 50 ft from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and

75.5 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 ft from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. to maintain compliance with the City’s 10‐minute noise standard of 55 dBA from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 45 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. The maximum noise levels stated above are constrained to the closest residence due to distance from the noise source and the noise standard. The maximum noise level does not factor in noise attenuation from the directionality of the speakers from the sound system or shielding from a barrier. Also, this maximum noise level standard is based on the City’s noise standards with the closest residence located within Indio, which is considered conservative because the applicable County of Riverside noise standard for Indio is 10 dBA higher from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. It should be noted that, the maximum generated noise level that would be allowable under the Municipal Code may need to be lower in the future to maintain compliance with the City’s noise standards as surrounding vacant land zoned for residential use is developed closer to the project site.

Page 918 ends

Item 17.
6/8/22 (P:\RNC2201\Product\Noise Analysis Memorandum.docx) 4 Table C: Noise Analysis
Receptor
No. Land Use City Direction
Noise Standard
(dBA Leq) Distance1
(ft)
Distance
Attenuation2
(dBA)
Maximum Noise Level
at 50 ft (dBA Leq)
6:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. to
6:00 a.m.
6:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. to
6:00 a.m.

R‐1 Residence Indio North 55 45 1,674 30.5 85.5 75.5R‐2 Residence Indio Northwest 55 45 1,740 30.8 85.9 75.8R‐3 Residence Coachella Northeast 55 45 4,146 38.4 93.4 83.4R‐4 Commercial Coachella Southeast 65 55 3,326 36.5 101.5 91.5 Source: Compiled by LSA (2022).1 Distance from the stage and cabana to the property line of off‐site land uses.2 A noise level reduction of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source was used for the point source distance attenuation3 A noise level reduction of 3 dBA was factored in due to the directionality of the speakers from the sound system. dBA = A‐weighted decibelsft = foot/feetLeq = equivalent continuous sound level Attachment: Figures 1–3

Page 919 ends

Item 17.

NOISE A NALYSIS
J UNE 2022
WEDDING VENUE AT 85321 AVENUE

COACHELLA , C ALIFORNIA
P:\RNC2201\Product\Noise Analysis Memorandum.docx (06/08/22)

ATTACHMENT

FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location
Figure 2: Site Plan
Figure 3: Surrounding Land Uses

Page 920 ends

Item 17.

CITY OF

COACHELLA

CITY OF
INDIO

UNINCORPORATED

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
Avenue 44
Terra
Lago Pkwy
Harrison Blvd
Tyler St
Harrison St
Vista Del Norte
Dillon Rd
§¨¦10
FIGURE 1
Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue 44 0 425 850
FEET
LEGEND
Project Site
Wedding Venue
Stage and Cabana
Riverside
County
Ã74
Ã195
Ã86 Ã111
§¨¦10
Project Vicinity
Project Location
Project Location SOURCE: Google Earth 2022
I:\RNC2201\G\Project_Location.ai (6/6/2022)
City Boundary

Page 921 ends

Item 17.

EXIT

KITCHEN KITCHEN
PED

ENTRANCE ENTRANCE

RESTROOMS RESTROOMS

CABANA & CABANA &
STAGE
WATER

FOUNTAIN FOUNTAIN

ENTRANCE ENTRANCE NTRANCE

PARKING PARKING
PED

ENTRANCE

KITCHEN RESTROOMS
TABLES
WATER

FOUNTAIN
TABLES
BARN
HAY
BIN
HAY

CABANA &
STAGE
FEET
0 275 550
FIGURE 2
I:\RNC2201\G\Site_Plan.ai (6/6/2022)
Site Plan
Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue 44
SOURCE: Google Earth 2022 Page 922
Item 17.

CITY OF

COACHELLA

CITY OF
INDIO

UNINCORPORATED

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
Avenue 44
Terra
Lago
Pkwy
Harrison Blvd
Tyler St
Harr si on St
Vista Del Norte
Dillon Rd
1,674 ft
1,740 ft
3,326
ft
4,146 ft
R-1
R-2
R-4
R-3
§¨¦10
SOURCE: Google (2021)
I:\RNC2201\GIS\MXD\Noise\SurroundingLandUses.mxd (6/6/2022) FIGURE 3
Wedding Venue at 85321 Avenue 44
Surrounding Land Uses
0 425 850
FEET
LEGEND
Project Site
Wedding Venue
Stage and Cabana

Page 923 ends

Item 17.

Rancho Escondido Photos – Existing Conditions (Proposed EP No. 22-02)

Page 924 ends

Item 17.

Page 925 ends

Item 17.

Page 926 ends

Item 17.

From: Deborah Schuster
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: Special event application
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 5:15:04 PM
Dear Mr. Perez,
My husband and I are homeowners since November 2021 at Four Seasons at Terra Lago. Our home backs up to Ave 44 east of the dirt road leading to Rancho Escondido, the proposed venue.

Since November there have been numerous events held at that location with extremely loud music playing on Saturday evenings. One particular night in December, the music lasted until 1 am and prevented us from sleeping with our windows CLOSED. More recently, a couple of weeks ago, the music continued past 11 pm and was loud enough for a deputy to be dispatched to investigate.

Each time this happens, we are unable to enjoy sitting in our yards, in what we thought would be a tranquil retirement home. Each time we have called the Sheriff's non emergency number and asked for personnel to be dispatched. Some evenings multiple residents have called multiple times with what appeared to be no follow up as the music continued unabated.

All of us who are affected, while over the age of 55, are robust, active people who enjoy a great party as much as the next person. Some are even professional musicians whose livelihoods depends on parties such as these.

While we have concerns about traffic congestion on an unlit, dangerous Ave 44, our first concern is the applicant's adherence to the city's noise ordinances. There are multiple new communities being built on Ave 44 who will also be subject to illegal noise levels, should this problem continue.

We expect and will continue to demand that the City Council ordinance compliance department be staffed to monitor and respond to resident complaints. I corresponded with this department in January and was told the resources didn't exist to put much if any time into following up on my complaint. This is unacceptable. Further, the Sheriff's department must also cooperate in enforcing the regulations governing this event property.

We are insisting that the existing laws be complied with, and that there are consequences, including suspension of permits, etc if the enjoyment of our neighborhood is denied us. We are reasonable people who have been more than patient while these problems have continued unchecked. We look forward to the City Council's consideration of these concerns while reviewing this application.

Sincerely,
Deborah and Bob Schuster

Page 927 ends

Item 17.

Page 928 ends

Item 17.

Page 929 ends

Item 17.

From: [email protected]
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: 85321 Avenue 44…ie PARTY HOUSE
Date: Sunday, April 3, 2022 11:04:41 AM
I understand the venue located off Avenue 44 (85321 Avenue 44) near Four Seasons is applying for a license/permit for their events.

Let me say this venue has been nothing but a noise issue since they started! We cannot open our windows, sit in our yards, entertain outside or anything else because the music is So Loud!
I cannot believe they are being allowed to do this so close to residences! We have lived here since 2019 and it has been quiet up until this place started with their events! It makes weekends here completely unbearable. Not only is it loud but Avenue 44 is very dark when the sun goes down and I can’t help but think of all the accidents that will occur when the events let out. I’m sure alcohol is being served at these events!
My Husband and I are very concerned about a permit/license being granted to this venue!
If you don’t believe us about the noise you should get over here and listen for yourself!
I guarantee there will be a whole lot of complaints regarding the noise every time it happens if there is no resolve to this!
Please reconsider giving them a venue license!
Karen Salamone
43875 Treviso Drive
Indio CA 92203

Page 930 ends

Item 17.

From: Larry Caris
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: Special Event Application
Date: Sunday, April 3, 2022 8:32:46 PM
Dear Mr. Perez,
My wife and I are homeowners at K.Hovnanian's Four Seasons at Terra Lago. Our home backs up to Avenue 44 east of the dirt road leading to Rancho Escondido, the proposed venue.

To say that my wife and I are not happy campers regarding this venue is an understatement! Since we moved to our new home in December, 2021, there have been a number of events at this proposed location which have featured
extremely loud music on Saturday evenings which have lasted well beyond the 11:00 PM limit, with one even ending at about 1:00 AM!!
When the music is playing, it is impossible to enjoy our backyard, and we even hear the music in our house with the windows closed, making it extremely difficult to sleep. This is not right, nor is it fair.

We wish the owners of the venue no ill will. We just ask that they recognize that they do have neighbors, and that they have the common decency to respect noise and time ordinances.

Sincerely,
Larry & Phyllis Caris

Page 931 ends

Item 17.

From: Lou ann Karimabadi
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: Rancho Escondido Request for Special Event Facility Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 8:28:15 AM
Hello Mr. Perez,
I am writing to comment on the request for a Special Event Facility on Ave. 44, Coachella. I just want to let you know that while I do not object to a family having a business, it has been some concern of the noise levels that have been occurring for quite some time at the property. I live across the road in Four Seasons Terra Lago 55 plus community and the noise from the music has at many times been so loud that you can feel it pounding in your chest and m any times far into the morning hours, i.e. 2:30 a.m.

Many residents have called the police.

Also, with a venue that is requesting up to 200 people, traffic is a large concern especially if alcohol will be served.

Again, I do not object to a business and a family's livelihood, I just hope that the City will require compliance with and enforce Code Violations of any kind if indeed, this venue is approved.

Thank you.

Lou Ann Karimabadi
949-940-5347
[email protected]

Page 932 ends

Item 17.

From: Michelle F
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: Noise issue
Date: Sunday, April 3, 2022 10:02:45 AM
Hello,
I am building a home in Four Seasons Terra Lago and just got wind of a "party house" on avenue 44 in which appears to be right behind where I am building as well as the entire phase of new homes. I'm sure you are aware this is a 55 plus community and generally speaking, we are looking for a quiet and calm environment. I understand the noise levels from this house go on way past midnight exceeding noise ordinance levels. I also understand they are trying to obtain some kind of license. While I don't want to get in the way of someone's livelyhood, I certainly want to be able to have a good night's sleep so I oppose anything that will get in the way of that and the noise level sounds like it's going to be way too much. It sounds like the police are being contacted continuously regarding this nuisance wasting tax dollars. Please do something to take care of this nuisance so it doesn't continue.

Thank you,
Michelle Frye

Page 933 ends

Item 17.

From: Tom and Julie
To: Gabriel Perez
Subject: Rancho Escondido entertainment noise concerns
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 12:06:21 PM
4/4/2022
Dear Gabriel Perez,
My name is Julie Christenson and I’m a resident of Four Seasons Terra Lago. Your name was given to me as a contact to email for the City of Coachella about my concerns. I’m writing you regarding the property named Rancho Escondido, address 85321 Avenue 44 in Coachella. It’s my understanding the homeowner is currently applying for a permit to host music events for up to 200 people.

Based on previously held music events at this address,prior to having an approved permit, I have concerns about the environmental and quality of life it has created during the events. The excessive noise seems to have been beyond the city established decibel level as well as the time limits established by the city.

Under Title 7, Chapter 7.04.040, “Prohibited noise generally”,the events held have met many of the violation guidelines. The events have also fallen under Chapter 7.04.050- “Disturbing excessive, offensive noises,Declaration of certain acts constituting.” As well as Chapter 7.04.030, “Sound level limits as related to fixed noise sources”.

I understand the homeowner is working diligently to meet the requirements of the permit application to hold these events. It’s been brought to my attention the homeowner is trying to provide a livelihood for her family with the income from the events and I have no ill will towards her or her means, but based on passed events held and the disregard of the city ordinances for such events, I’m concerned about future compliance city ordinances.

Additional concerns are:
* Is alcohol being served at the events and how is excessive alcohol use going to be addressed? * The entrance to the event is located on a two-lane street that doesn’t have a street light which creates a traffic safety concern
* Traffic management for patron arrival and departure
Thank you for your consideration,
Julie Christenson

Page 934 ends
← All documents from this meeting