Coachella City Council
September 10, 2025

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update

1. Housing Element Review: A performance evaluation of policies and programs from previous housing elements.

2. Housing Needs Assessment: A review of the existing and projected housing needs, especially regarding special needs populations

3. Adequate Sites Inventory: A record of suitable land zoned to accommodate the City’s share of regional housing needs

4. Housing Resources Assessment: Identified opportunities to support the development, preservation, and rehabilitation of housing

5. Housing Constraints Assessment: Identified governmental and non-governmental (market, environmental, etc.) impediments to housing development

6. Implementation Plan: Goals, policies, and programs dedicated to meeting the City’s housing need
What is the Housing Element
Housing Element Components
4

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
What is the Housing Element
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
Regional Housing Needs
Assessment or RHNA:
• Projected number of new housing
units needed
• Each jurisdiction must show it can
accommodate its total RHNA
number, and its allocations by
income level.
• Mandated by State law
SCAG CVAG Coachella
6th Cycle
RHNA
6th Cycle
RHNA
6th Cycle RHNA
Share
Very Low
30-50% MFI 352,796 6,204 1,033
Low
50-80% MFI 206,807 4,664 999
Moderate
80-120% MFI 223,957 5,561 1,367
Above
Moderate
>120% MFI
559,267 15,190 4,487
Total 1,341,827 31,619 7,886
Coachella City Median income 4-person household: $34,224 5 Riverside County Median income 4-person household: $67,005 Page 305 Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
What is the Housing Element
How Does the Housing Element Help the City Meet its Goals? • Develop an inventory of sites sufficient to meet
the City’s RHNA allocation
• Establish policies and programs to incentivize
both market-rate and affordable housing
development
• Identify additional strategies to reduce constraints
and expand housing production
6

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Update Process

WE ARE HERE
7

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Focus Groups - Why We Are Here
• Purpose: Introduce the housing element update,
discuss opportunities and constraints to housing
development, and receive policy/program
recommendations
• Who/When: Three (3) focus group sessions for a
variety of stakeholders including
o Community and Housing Advocates
o Housing Developers
o Local Institutions and Businesses
Update Process
8

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
• Group Norms
o Each participant will be treated with respect
o Please be mindful of time
o Allow other participants to finish speaking before beginning to speak • Format
o Open discussion with guided questions
o The chat function will be available if you would like to provide written comment, though the focus is will be on the dialogue.
• Recordation: Notes will be taken, and chats will be saved Focus Group Protocols
9

Item 11.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Discussion

Item 11.
983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | (805) 595 1345 | lisawiseconsulting.com | 4 Appendix B: Focus Group Discussion Questions
Community and Housing Advocates

1. Who are the most underserved groups in the City?

2. What type of housing is most needed/in short in supply in Coachella?

3. Do you see any disparities or concerns in housing patterns or trends in Coachella?

4. Are you concerned about concentration or segregation in housing access and/or opportunity in Coachella?

5. What are the most critical gaps in housing services/options in Coachella?

6. What are the challenges or barriers to filling these gaps/providing adequate and sufficient housing?

7. What would be your top policy or program recommendations to the City? Housing Developers

1. What types of housing does your organization specialize in? What role does your organization play in helping provide housing in Coachella?

2. What are the unique challenges with building housing in Coachella?

3. Are there any specific constraints with residential development standards and/or approval procedures in Coachella?

4. What are the most in demand housing typologies in Coachella? o What can the City do to facilitate these types of housing developments?

5. Where (geographically) do you see opportunities for (affordable) housing in Coachella?

6. What would be your top policy or program recommendations to Coachella?

7. For affordable developers only:
o Tell us about your most successful project in Coachella or nearby communities? Why? • What are the key factors for that success?
o What are the unique challenges with building affordable housing in Coachella?

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting Notes
Date: July 26, 2021
Time: 5:00 PM
Attendees:

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.:
• Kathryn Slama
• David Bergman
• Lindsey Squirewell
City of Coachella:
• Gabriel Perez, Assistant Community Development Director Steering Committee:
• Ana Perez
• Taylor Varner
• Fernando Heredia
• Mike Walsh
• Jim Kosak
• Daniel Wozniak
• Absent
 Sahara Huazano – Alianza Coachella Valley
 Dave Davis- Chelsea Investments

1. Introductions

1. Taylor Varner - Lift to Rise
a. Lives in Indio
b. Regional Affordable Housing Planner at Lift to Rise
c. Wants to contribute as a community developer and provide input to the local government on constraints

2. Fernando Heredia - Our Lady of Soledad
a. Deacon at Our Lady of Soledad
b. Lives in La Quinta
c. Wants to help because effective housing creates productive citizenship E2.- Steering Committee Meetings

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2

3. Mike Walsh – Riverside County Housing Authority
a. Works for Riverside County Housing Authority, Workforce Housing b. Member of Our Lady of Soledad
c. Lives in Indio
d. Wants to help with solving housing challenges and creating effective partnerships with other organizations

4. Ana Perez – Real Estate Agent
a. Lives and works in Coachella for 12 years
b. Real estate professional
c. Opened her real-estate office in 2020
d. Wants to contribute housing market knowledge and service to the community

5. Jim Kosak – Strategic Land Partners
a. Works for Strategic Land Partners
b. Owner of 280-acre property
c. Developed hotels, mixed-use, and multi-family and single-family detached residential
d. Has 25 years of real-estate experience

6. Daniel Wozniak - Pulte Homes
a. Works as a developer for Pulte Homes (3rd largest builder in the U.S.) b. Four projects in Coachella, 50 – 200 lot projects
c. Lives in Coachella
d. Interested in what the City’s housing goals and interests are for the future

2. Steering Committee Overview
a. Discussed Role and Purpose of the Steering Committee b. Advisory Recommendations to City staff

3. Discussion
• No one is building 30 du/ac (HCD assumes affordable housing more likely on properties with densities allowed up to 30 du/ac). Cap and trade project (Pueblo villas) probably isn’t 30 ac/du. It is difficult to achieve the required density unless the units are studio or one bedroom, as its too expensive to build taller. The market cannot absorb the cost of affordable housing construction without outside sources. The current rents are not high enough to cover the costs of more expensive development typologies.
• Coachella needs more infrastructure investment, reduce funding and timing for future projects.

Suggests that policies should focus on high density and lower development costs to help fulfill the requirements (e.g. tiered fee structure). Opportunity to shorten entitlement timeline (takes years at times). Suggests City makes SB 35 streamlining more visible as an option.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 • Land brokers need incentives to increase density to bring down land costs and lower development costs if City wants to affordable housing units. Most owners entitle larger lots (7,200 sf) to set up for product types of key developers. Consider streamlining and allowing smaller lots w/o extra process.
• Organizations such as Habitat for Humanity will be helpful in the affordable housing construction and helping increase housing supply.
• Builders want certainty in development. Time to entitle land is a negative. Owners/developers will not ask for exceptions to requirements (even if allowed), if it would require any extra process or extend the review/entitlement period.
• Cost of land:
o Raw land always takes time to process, it is an expectation in the entitlement process o Cost of land depends on size, if it entitled, utility access, etc. o Some people buy land cheap, entitle and process CEQA then resell much higher (e.g. $10k/acre Agricultural land resell at $400k to $1M/acre if entitled and ready to go • City seeking “pro-housing’ designation. Recommend adding policies into the Housing Element to help identify incentives.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting Agenda
Date: August 16, 2021
Time: 5:00 PM
Attendees:

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC):
• Kathryn Slama
• David Bergman
• Lindsey Squirewell
City of Coachella:
• Gabriel Perez, Assistant Community Development Director Steering Committee:
• Ana Perez– Real Estate Agent
• Taylor Varner - Lift to Rise
• Fernando Heredia- Our Lady of Soledad
• Mike Walsh – Riverside County Housing Authority
• Jim Kosak– Strategic Land Partners
• Daniel Wozniak - Pulte Homes
• Sahara Huazano (1st meeting) – Alianza Coachella Valley • Kenneth Rogers (1st meeting) – CVHC Sr project Manager in Indio

1. Technical Assessment Discussion
o Is Coachella considering an inclusionary housing requirement? o Is the 5th Cycle rezone program completed?
 City estimates completion in September 2021
o Is rezoning expected for the 6th cycle?
 City has capacity under General Plan land use. City will need to rezone to implement the General Plan
o Is City pursuing a “pro-housing” designation?
o Will the Housing Element address homelessness and farmworkers? o Constraints
 Development fees are higher for singer family development

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2  City should compare to other cities in the desert
 Are other requirements a constraint (e.g. setbacks)
• For single family, setbacks are not a constraint. Reduced setbacks would allow larger building envelope (for single family), not necessarily help with affordability
• Relaxed setbacks can create more infill sites opportunities – all density options should be considered
 Street with smaller widths (that don’t meet City ROW requirements) are subject to HOA rules and not zoning rules. This is difficult at times • Some developments provide private small street with no sidewalks to decrease building costs
• City to allow smaller streets, can avoid HOA and reduce costs o Affordable Housing and Incentives
 What are the incentives for developer to provide affordable housing since the profit yields less than market rate housing? Needs to make up the difference and protect market rate owners investment
 Incentives are usually a requirement of affordable development, unless City implements inclusionary requirement
 Community Land Trust- maintain affordability when sold  Single family is being excluded from affordable housing assumptions because high density requirements for affordable housing
 Affordable housing is not affordable to build, just affordable to tenants. Need subsidy and tax credits
 Don’t limit development too much, otherwise other development types are not feasible (e.g. single family)
 Programs can include covenants for home loans (for certain professions (teachers, nurses) they can qualify for higher loans
 For profit companies and nonprofit companies should team up to qualify for the most financing options (and the nonprofit can help navigate requirements for subsidy and tax credits)
 Developers should have options to include affordable housing

2. Draft Implementation Plan
o How are we going to prioritize affordable housing?
o Are we going to expand residential zones?
o SB35
 General Plan/Zoning consistency is a challenge without an updated Code  Look into San Francisco as a reference for SB35 implementation procedures o Uncertainty is the biggest risk for developers
 Remove CEQA requirements, decrease building process & plan check time

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3  Developers would pay extra for express/expedited processing  We should develop ways to lower development fees or give land to developers  Fee waivers to expedite process
o A city funded senior center funded would be a good amenity – provide residential development near by
o Amenities and neighborhood resources are important to consider to ensure equity in housing placement
 Create a subdivision of affordable housing next to market rate o No known areas of segregation or concentration
o No areas as high resources or opportunity by TCAC, this is a disadvantage when competing for funding
 What does Coachella need to have higher numbers of opportunity zones o Coachella has low income compared to region, but higher rate of home ownership  How to maintain ownership opportunities without USDA 502 loans

Item 11.
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting #3 Agenda
Date: August 27, 2021 Call-In Number: +1669 900 6833
Time: 5:00 PM Meeting ID: 825 3325 0937 Passcode: 888689 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82533250937?pwd=a2FCLzZVRUJuZ1lpVzkrcVNIcmlaUT09

1. Welcome

2. Draft Housing Element Release
a. Goals and Policies/ Programs Discussion

4. Public Workshop Preparation – October 14th
a. Ideas for Workshop Format
b. Outreach

5. Next Steps
a. Joint Study Session of City Council and Planning Commission Nov 8 at 5 p.m.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 City of Coachella
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
Public Workshop
Thursday, October 14, 2021, at 6:00 pm
Zoom Webinar
Introduction
On October 14, 2021, the City of Coachella (City) hosted a virtual public workshop for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update project. Gabriel Perez, Community Development Director, opened the meeting and explained the intent of the workshop is to provide information about the Housing Element Update process and answer questions. The presentation was available in English and live Spanish translation. Director Perez introduced additional City staff and the Consultant Team, Lisa Wise Consulting Inc. (LWC). Kathryn Slama, Senior Associate and project manager, and David Bergman, Director, presented on behalf of LWC. The presentation addressed the following topics:

1. Housing Element Overview

2. Process and Public Outreach

3. Housing Needs and Conditions in Coachella

4. Public Review Draft Housing Element

5. Next Steps for the Coachella Housing Element Update

6. Questions and Discussion
Format
The public workshop was facilitated by City staff, with a presentation from LWC. Due to COVID19 conditions, the meeting was held virtually via Zoom. Public participants were able to access the meeting by computer or by phone in English or Spanish. Participants were encouraged to provide feedback on the presentation and Housing Element document verbally at the meeting or by Zoom comment box. Over 20 people virtually attended the public workshop.

The City prepared a community workshop notice in English and Spanish that was published on the project website, Coachellahousingelement.com and distributed by the City. (see below).

E3.- Public Workshop

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2 The City remains available to accept comments or answer questions via phone or email.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 Summary of Comments
The following is a summary of questions and comments from members of the public and the subsequent discussion held during the public workshop:
• How can interested persons participate in the Housing Element Update process? There are many ways to participate in the Housing Element Update process. The steering committee meetings included non-profit and for-profit developers, faith-based groups, and the housing authority, among others. This workshop is another way to participate.

Additional opportunities for participation include the November 8, 2021, 5 p.m. City Council and Planning Commission study session and an upcoming online survey (expected the week of October 25, 2021)
• What does “affordable housing” mean? “Affordable” is a technical term that refers to the amount of income spent on housing (no more than 30%) relative to income categories set by the State (e.g., Extremely Low, Very Low, Low, Moderate) based on a region’s Area Median Income (AMI), in this case, for Riverside County. The AMI metric is often used on the scale of the household, instead of on the scale of individual persons. Affordable housing generally includes below market-rate housing and can come in a variety of all kinds of building types, including duplexes, courtyard housing, and apartments. • How is the City ensuring that Coachella residents won’t be displaced, including lowincome persons of color? The City should look at inclusionary zoning ordinances, rent control, land trusts, and types of anti-displacement strategies. The idea behind a housing element update is to ensure that cities have enough space available to produce housing attainable to persons at all income levels, including below market-rate housing.

Many of the sites identified by the City that will be used for complying with the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) are on vacant land, so they will not remove existing housing. In addition, the program recommendations (e.g. anti-displacement strategies) will be included for consideration at the upcoming City Council and Planning Commission study session scheduled for November 8, 2021. • How will the City prevent segregation of neighborhoods based on income levels and the concentration of poverty? The City is sensitive to this issue. Pursuant to state law, the City will conduct an analysis to “affirmatively further fair housing” and investigate areas that may be segregated by income, race, etc. Once that analysis is complete, the City will be able to identify any pockets of concentrated poverty and see whether any lowincome housing sites are identified there, and develop programs or policies as appropriate.
• The City should have its Code Enforcement Division help rehabilitate existing housing, such as small loans for residents to make repairs. The City does provide a Residential Rehabilitation Program to residents (as funding is available), and will continue to advertise this on its website, share information with service organizations, and post information in City Hall. Please also see Program 2.1 of the Housing Element Update.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 4 • Does the Housing Element Update consider climate goals and proximity to transit in its analyses? Yes, the Housing Element Update promotes housing near jobs and transit to reduce climate impacts that occur on account of commutes.

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 City of Coachella
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City Council/Planning Commission Joint Study Session
Monday, November 8, 2021, at 5:00 pm
Zoom Webinar and In-Person at the Coachella City Hall Council Chambers Introduction
On November 8, 2021, the City of Coachella (City) hosted an in-person/virtual joint City Council/Planning Commission study session for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update project.

Mayor Steven Hernandez opened the meeting and introduced Gabriel Perez, Community Development Director, who explained the intent of the study session was to review the draft Housing Element Update, as well as to receive comment and answer questions. The presentation was available in English and live Spanish translation. Director Perez introduced the Consultant Team, Lisa Wise Consulting Inc. (LWC). Kathryn Slama, Senior Associate and project manager, and David Bergman, Director, presented on behalf of LWC. The presentation addressed the following topics:

1. Housing Element Overview

2. Process and Public Outreach

3. Housing Needs and Conditions in Coachella

4. Public Review Draft Housing Element

5. Public Workshop

6. Next Steps for the Coachella Housing Element Update

7. Questions and Discussion
Format
The study session was facilitated by Mayor Hernandez, Planning Commission Chair Virgen, and Director Perez, with a presentation from LWC. Due to COVID-19 conditions, the meeting was held virtually via Zoom with the option for in-person attendance at the Coachella City Hall Council Chambers. Public participants were able to access the meeting by computer or by phone in English or Spanish. Participants were encouraged to provide feedback on the presentation and Housing Element document verbally at the meeting or by Zoom comment box. Over 15 people attended the study session via Zoom.

The City noticed the study session on the City’s website and according to standard public meeting procedures.

E4.- Study Session

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2 The meeting was recorded and posted on the City’s webpage (https://coachellaca.swagit.com/play/11092021-715) so it may be viewed at any time. The City remains available to accept comments or answer questions via phone or email.

Summary of Comments
The following is a summary of questions and comments from both City Council and Planning Commission members, as well as questions and comments from members of the public. Three emails were also entered into the record.
• Elected and appointed officials want to receive Housing Element Update materials sufficiently in advance of meetings to be more prepared. • Does the fact that the median income in Riverside County is higher than the median income in Coachella present opportunities for Coachella? While grants and other funding for affordable housing are very competitive, the relative lower income of Coachella residents is a factor that could help proposed affordable housing projects in Coachella score higher for receiving funding or tax credits from programs through Riverside County or the State. Additionally, because the income limits are based on County-wide figures, a larger proportion of Coachella’s households will qualify for below market rate housing. • The City should look at its last (5th cycle) housing element update to see how it has been recently promoting affordable housing. The City has 560 units in the pipeline; 106 currently under construction. Let’s promote our successes. The City does look at how it has performed over the last housing cycle through its current housing element

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 update. The housing element update will highlight how many affordable units have been built since the start of the last housing cycle.
• Affordable housing units in the City should be high-quality. Coachella residents that live in affordable housing units should not feel inferior to other residents, especially because of the quality of their housing. We want residents to feel at home and not segregated. While capacity constraints such as lot coverage restrictions can negatively impact the profitability of housing projects, and therefore in part the type of materials used for construction of affordable housing units, the Housing Element Update team will work to ensure affordable housing is not distinct from market-rate housing. The City can consider programs to require projects to provide the same type of fixtures and appliances for market rate and affordable units.
• The City needs to update its Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map to be consistent with its General Plan. The City currently is circulating a request for qualifications (RFQ) to this effect.
• The City should address senior housing needs, both in the short and long term.

Senior housing should be near amenities, as some senior may not have reliable transportation or may not be able to drive. The City should also streamline senior housing projects.
• The City should ensure sufficient housing for veterans and needs to collaborate with developers to build affordable housing.
• Housing prices continue to increase, whereas household incomes are remaining stagnant in Coachella. What can be done to combat this? The housing element is a roadmap for the production of affordable housing units, or the supply side of housing.

While access to high paying employment is a challenge, the housing element does not address this directly. Moreover, the City is looking into how to reduce governmental constraints that artificially increase the cost of housing, such as particular minimum lot sizes.
• Although the City has high homeownership rates, most homeowners in Coachella are cost-burdened by the cost of their housing. This is a problem for families. • The City should consider adopting an inclusionary zoning ordinance. • The City should encourage different types of housing (e.g., “missing middle” housing). This includes condominiums and fourplexes, etc. These types of housing should also be near amenities, such as access to medicine, jobs, churches, and counseling centers. We can look at the Zona Central between Avenue 50 and 52 to continue the grid. The housing element update promotes a diversified housing stock— everything from detached single-family housing to missing middle housing to federally subsidized, traditional affordable housing. The Housing Element acknowledges that access to amenities is an important factor in remaining competitive for subsidies and grant

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 4 funds for affordable housing and will continue to work with developers to align sites for housing with high opportunity areas.
• Can the City require that first-time homebuyers have priority over others when submitting offers to purchase a home? The housing element team is not aware of any such programs in California. First-time homebuyer programs do exist where cities provide access to low interest rates or other types of funding, or education programs for first-time homebuyers. In some cities, first-time homebuyers experience difficulties in buying housing when they must compete with short-term rentals. The City does participate in a first-time homebuyer assistance program through Riverside County. • The City should consider a bond instrument, community revitalization investment authority, a transit occupancy tax, and/or inclusionary zoning geared towards housing. The City should also incentivize developers to build affordable housing, and increase fees for developers that don’t build it.
• The City should streamline affordable housing projects (have a quick turnaround time for plan check and reviews).

Screenshots
Screenshots from the Public Hearing are included below:

Item 11.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 5 Page 327 Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-1 Appendix F: Affirmatively Furthering
Fair Housing (AFFH)
Contents
Appendix F: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH).......................F-1 Section F.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................F-2 F.1.1 Notes on Figures and Analysis...........................................................................F-2 Section F.2 Assessment of Fair Housing...............................................................................F-2 F.2.1 Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement...........................................................F-2 F.2.2 Integration and Segregation ...............................................................................F-5 F.2.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty ..................................F-1614 F.2.4 Access to Opportunity ..................................................................................F-2118 F.2.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs..................................................................F-3028 F.2.6 Other Relevant Factors ................................................................................F-3835 F.2.7 Summary of Fair Housing Issues .................................................................F-4137 Section F.3 Sites Inventory..............................................................................................F-4238 F.3.1 Potential Effects on Patterns of Segregation..................................................F-440 F.3.2 Potential Effects on Access to Opportunity ....................................................F-473 Section F.4 Contributing Factors and Meaningful Actions.................................................F-516

Item 11.

F-2 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Section F.1 Introduction
Assembly Bill 686, signed in 2018, establishes a statewide framework to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) with the goal of achieving better economic and health outcomes for all Californians through equitable housing policies. AB 686 requires cities and counties to take deliberate actions to foster inclusive communities, advance fair and equal housing choice, and address racial and economic disparities through local policies and programs. Housing elements are now required to address the following five components:
• Inclusive and Equitable Outreach: A summary of fair housing outreach and capacity that includes all economic segments of the community.
• Assessment of Fair Housing: An assessment of fair housing issues, including integration and segregation patterns, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs for all identified populations
• Analysis of Sites Inventory: An evaluation of whether the sites inventory of the Housing Element improves or exacerbates conditions for fair housing. • Identification of Contributing Factors: The identification and prioritization of contributing factors related to fair housing issues.
• Priorities, Goals, and Actions to AFFH: The identification of fair housing goals and actions that directly address the contributing factors outlined above. The housing element should include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress and fair housing results.

This section documents four of the five components of the AFFH components. The summary of AFFH-related outreach is included in Appendix E.

F.1.1 Notes on Figures and Analysis
This Appendix contains geospatial data downloaded from HCD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Resources Hub. Additional analysis is sourced from the Census American Community Survey (ACS) and HCD’s pre-certified data, where appropriate.

Section F.2 Assessment of Fair Housing
F.2.1 Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
Fair housing complaints can be an indicator of housing discrimination. Fair housing issues can arise through discrimination against an individual based on the protected classifications of disability, race, national origin, familial status, disability, religion, or sex when renting or selling a dwelling unit.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-3 The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) is the federal agency responsible for eliminating housing discrimination, promote economic opportunity, and achieve diverse, inclusive communities. FHEO services and activities include investigating fair housing complaints, conducting compliance reviews, ensuring civil rights in HUD programs, and managing fair housing grants.

The City refers residents to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing services for its residents. The Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) provides fair housing services to urban and unincorporated areas of Riverside County including Coachella. IFHMB offers training workshops and presentations about fair housing laws and the services and resources available through the agency. Workshops and presentations are offered for housing providers, city staff, and the public throughout the year. Topics covered in these workshops include federal and state fair housing laws, examples of discriminatory activities, suggested actions to avoid discrimination complaints, and providing resources such as brochures and other literature. The city provides residents with an online form through their website that allows people to submit fair housing complaints for a quick response time.

The City will maintain this partnership and will provide information regarding available fair housing services on the City’s website. The fair housing services provided by both the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and IFHMB include providing information, investigation, education, conciliation, and/or referrals of housing discrimination complaints free of charge to individuals. It also provides fair housing workshops that are offered year-round to educate housing providers, tenants, homeowners, and financial and lending institutions on the key aspects of fair housing law. Further, their mediation departments provide information to landlords, tenants, mobile home park owners, and mobile home residents regarding their rights and responsibilities under the California Landlord and Tenant Laws, and facilitates negotiations between parties in housingrelated disputes.

This section discusses the fair housing services available to residents in the City and the corresponding organizations that provide fair housing services to both providers and consumers of housing, as well as the nature and extent of fair housing complaints received by the fair housing provider. In general, fair housing services include investigating and resolving housing discrimination complaints; discrimination auditing and testing; and education and outreach, such as disseminating fair housing information through written materials, workshops, and seminars.

The City refers residents to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing services for its residents by disseminating educational information, performing investigations, local conciliation, and/or referrals of housing discrimination complaints free of charge to individuals. It also involves fair housing community workshops that are offered year-round to educate housing providers, tenants, homeowners, and financial and lending institutions on the key aspects of fair housing laws. From 2015 through 2017, the IFHMB provided fair housing services to 45 City residents. Of these individuals, 97 percent were lower-income earners. The largest race/ethnic group that was

Item 11.

F-4 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing provided fair housing services were Hispanic people. Through these, the City is well able to effectively disseminate fair housing resources and educational material through community outreach and other fair housing services provided to the residents of the City.

According to the California Department of Employment and Fair Housing, from 2009 through 2013, there were 17 fair housing cases in the City. Within this period, the highest number of fair housing cases filed were on the basis of race/color, resulting in 9 cases, followed by familial status with seven cases. Sexual orientation and having a national origin from Mexico had zero housing cases filed within the same period. Further, data from the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) AFFH data viewer tool shows that from 2013 to 2021 there were fewer than 0.5 fair housing equal opportunity inquiries per 1,000 people in the City, as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This includes 23 total inquiries within the 2013-2021 period of which one was on the basis of disability, one on the basis of race, two on the basis of familial status, one on the basis of sex, and the rest were uncategorized. The disposition count for these inquiries was zero, while most were categorized as a failure to respond or to not be a valid issue. Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) data indicate that six inquiries were made in the City from Jan. 2013 to March 2021 on account of familial status (1), national origin (2), and no reason listed (3). The city does not have any pending lawsuits, enforcement actions, judgements, settlements, or findings related to fair housing and civil rights. There are no known fair housing lawsuits in the City.

City enforces fair housing and complies with fair housing laws and regulations through a twofold process: review of local policies and codes for compliance with State law, and referral of fair housing complaints to appropriate agencies. The City complies with State and federal housing laws as follows:
• Fair Housing Act; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – the City complies by ensuring its actions related to housing are not discriminatory through City protocols, decisionmaking procedures, and adhering to non-discrimination requirements of federal funding programs.
• American Disabilities Act – the City complies with the ADA through building permit review and issuance and as described in Appendix C (Housing Constraints, Section C.2.2, Housing for Persons with Disabilities).
• California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and FEHA Regulations – the City complies with FEHA and its regulations through referrals to legal assistance organizations, such as Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB). The Housing Element includes policies and programs to continue to provide Fair Housing information in person and online, educate landlords and tenants regrading Fair Housing laws and tenant rights.
• Review Process (Government Code Section 65008) – The City Zoning Code is written to ensure that the City reviews affordable development projects in the same way as

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-5 market-rate developments except in cases where affordable housing projects are eligible for preferential treatment. City’s actions regarding the development of housing for persons and families of very low, low, moderate, and middle incomes, or emergency shelters for the homeless, are not discriminatory. Programs are included in this Housing Element to facilitate housing for all households, including protected classes (e.g., programs regarding group homes, emergency shelters, and reasonable accommodation procedures). • Assembly Bill 686 (Government Code Section 8899.50) – Appendix F of this Housing Element documents compliance with Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements. • Equal Access (Government Code Section 11135 et. seq.) – the City complies with antidiscrimination requirements by offering translation services for all public meetings and offers accessibility accommodations to ensure equal access to all regardless of membership or perceived membership in a protected class. • Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915) – the City implements a density bonus program, as described in Appendix C (Housing Constraints) The Housing Element includes a program to ensure the City complies with recent updates to the Density Bonus Law.
• Senate Bill 35 (Government Code Section 65913.4). The Housing Element includes a program to comply with SB 35 by establishing a written policy or procedure, as well as other guidance as appropriate, to streamline the approval process and standards for eligible projects.
• Housing Accountability Act (Government Code Section 65589.5) – the City complies with the HAA by following established review periods and timelines. Housing Element includes programs to develop objective design standards to facilitate non-discretionary review of housing projects in compliance with the HAA.
• No-Net-Loss Law (Government Code Section 65863) – the City has documented compliance with sufficient capacity for RHNA, with a surplus capacity of over 3,000 units across all income categories. The City will ensure compliance with no-net-loss via required annual reporting to HCD.

F.2.2 Integration and Segregation
This section analyzes integration and segregation, including patterns and trends, related to populations with protected characteristics.

Race and Ethnicity
According to the United States Census, American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 72 percent of the Coachella population belonged to a racial minority group in 2019 (this is the most recent year that data is available). Coachella has more non-white racial and ethnic groups than Riverside County where this population comprises about 40 percent of the County’s total

Item 11.

F-6 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing population. Coachella has fewer White residents at about 28 percent of the population than the county at about 60 percent. In Coachella, 98 percent of the population of is Hispanic or Latino (of any race), compared to 48 percent of the population of Riverside County (see Appendix A, Housing Needs Assessment, Section A.2.3).

Figure F-1 provides Coachella’s historic non-white population percentages by block group from 2010 census data. Two block groups had non-white populations at that time that were between 21 and 40 percent and two block groups had percentages between 61 and 80 percent. The rest of the city at that time was in the 41 to 60 percent range. Surrounding areas of the city had similar levels of non-white populations in the 2010 census data.

Figure F-2 shows the non-white population percentage by census block group for 2018. The majority of block groups in the city had non-white populations above 80 percent. One block group in the northern portion of the city had a non-white population percentage of about 35 percent, one block group in the west had a non-white population of about 55 percent, and one block group had a non-white population of about 64 percent to the east.

The city had higher percentages of non-white population overall in 2018 as compared to 2010 according to census data. The 2018 ACS data showed an increase in non-white population percentages in all block groups in the city over 2010 levels. Coachella contains a racial and ethnic composition that is different from the region with a higher proportion of non-white population than the county, but it has a similar racial and ethnic composition to the block groups adjacent to the city.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-7 Figure F-1: Non-White Population Percentage (2010)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-8 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-2: Non-White Population Percentage (2018)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Disability
People are considered to have a disability if they have one or more of the following: hearing difficulty, vision difficulty, cognitive difficulty, ambulatory difficulty, self-care difficulty, and independent living difficulty. Figure F-3 presents the census data for 2010 and 2014 for percentage of population with a disability and Figure F-4 shows the ACS 2015 to 2019 data for percentage of population with a disability.

According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, approximately 8.0 percent of Coachella residents had a disability at that time, compared to 11.6 percent countywide (Table F-1). About half of Coachella’s census tracts had less than 10 percent of residents experiencing disability while the other half had between 10 and 20 percent during both five-year time periods. The distribution of this population is not appreciably different from the block groups adjacent to the city.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-9 Table F-1: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2019) Year Coachella Riverside County
Number Percentage Percentage
2019 3,635 8.0% 11.6%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1810
Figure F-3: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2010 - 2014) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-10 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-4: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of at least one child under 18 years old. Examples of familial status discrimination include refusal to rent to families with children, eviction of families once a child joins, confinement of families to specific floors of a building, and overly restrictive rules regarding children’s use of common areas.

According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, 31.0 percent of households in Coachella have one or more children under the age of 18. The city’s share of households with children present is lower than that of the county overall at 37.6 percent. It is higher than the surrounding neighboring jurisdictions of Indio (26.6 percent), La Quinta (23.9 percent), and Palm Desert (16.8 percent). Approximately

18.6 percent of married-couple households in Coachella have one or more children under the age of 18 versus 23.4 percent in the county overall (Table F-2).

Figure F-5 shows the approximate distribution of children in married couple households in Coachella. The estimated percentages of children residing within married couple households are

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-11 highest in northern and western portions of the city at over 80 percent according to the most recent ACS data. This estimate ranges from about 53 percent to about 78 percent in other census tracts of the city.

Single parent households are also a fair housing protected class. Coachella has 5.3 percent of households comprised of male or female single-parent households with children. Female-headed households are of particular concern because they may experience greater housing affordability challenges due to typically lower household incomes compared to two-parent households. An estimated 4.8 percent of households in Coachella are single female-headed households with children (Table F-3).

As shown in Figure F-6, Coachella has some variability in the estimated percentages of children in single female-headed households. The number of children in female-headed households varies across the city from about 9 percent in the north to about 30 percent in the southern portion according to the ACS data.

Table F-2: Percentage of Married-Couple Households with Children Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 18.6% 23.4%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02
Table F-3: Percentage of Female-Headed Households with Children, No Spouse/Partner Present Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 4.8% 5.1%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02

Item 11.

F-12 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-5: Children in Married-Couple Households (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-13 Figure F-6: Children in Female-Headed Households with No Partner Present (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Income
According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, the median household income in Coachella is $34,224, which is about half of the Riverside County median of $67,005 over the same period. Median household incomes in Coachella and Riverside County for 2019 are presented in Table F-4.

Figure F-7 displays the distribution of median household income by census block group in Coachella. Variations in household income are observed in adjacent block groups in the city with five block groups exhibiting median household income levels below $30,000. Most of the city has incomes in the $30,000 to $55,000 range, below the 2020 state median income of $87,100. One overlapping census block in a western portion of the city contains the next highest median income range ($55,000 to $87,100).

Item 11.

F-14 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Table F-4: Median Household Income
Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 $34,224 $67,005
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1901
Figure F-7: Median Household Income (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Low to Moderate Income Households
Figure F-8 displays income distribution across Coachella by showing the estimated percentage of low to moderate (LMI) income households by census tract. Most of the tracts in Coachella have more than 50% LMI households. The percentages within these tracts rage from 54 to 71 percent.

Two tracts that extend beyond city limits to the north and west contain approximately 22 percent and 17 percent of LMI households, respectively. Levels of LMI households are similar to Coachella to the north, east, and south of the city and generally lower to the west of the city. This

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-15 pattern reflects the general trend within the Coachella Valley of the number of LMI households increasing from southwest to northeast.

Figure F-8: Low to Moderate Income Population (2011 – 2015) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Income is also disaggregated by race and ethnicity to further understand local patterns of segregation and integration. The poverty rates among racial and ethnic groups in Coachella and Riverside County are presented in Table F-5. Although the citywide poverty rate was 21.8 percent in 2019 compared to 13.7 percent for Riverside County, not all racial and ethnic groups in Coachella have the same likelihood of experiencing poverty.

The data presented in Table F-5 shows that city residents identifying as “Some Other Race” alone have the highest poverty rate of 24.3 percent as compared to 11.4 percent in the county (second lowest). Note that it is a common occurrence in communities with large Hispanic populations to select “Some Other Race”, as the distinction between race and ethnicity is sometimes unclear to census respondents. White residents have a poverty rate of 17.0 percent and make up 27.8 percent of the city population. These two groups combined account for approximately 98 percent

Item 11.

F-16 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing of the city population. The poverty rate for Hispanic or Latino individuals of any race in Coachella is 22.0 percent and this group constitutes 97.3 percent of the city population.

Black, American Indian, and two or more race residents experience poverty at high rates relative to their share of the population. These groups each represent less than 1 percent of the population but they each have poverty rates of about 5 percent according to ACS data.

Table F-5: Poverty by Race/Ethnicity (2019)
Race/Ethnicity
Coachella Riverside County
Number in
Poverty Poverty Rate % of Total Population Poverty Rate Total population below poverty
level estimate 9,814 21.8% - 13.7%
White alone 2,130 17.0% 27.8% 12.0%
Black or African American alone 13 4.9% 0.6% 17.5%
American Indian and Alaska Native
alone 21 5.4% 0.9% 20.8%
Asian alone 0 0.0% 0.3% 11.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander alone 0 0.0% 0.0% 13.0%
Some Other Race alone 7,632 24.3% 69.7% 18.2%
Two or more races 18 5.5% 0.7% 11.4%
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race) 9,683 22.0% 97.3% 16.7%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1701
F.2.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) are areas that exhibit both high racial/ethnic concentrations and high poverty rates. HUD defines R/ECAPs as census tracts with a majority non-white population (50 percent or more) and a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average poverty rate for the county, whichever is lower.

R/ECAPs may indicate the presence of disadvantaged households facing housing insecurity and need. They identify areas whose residents may have faced historical discrimination and who continue to experience economic hardship, furthering entrenched inequities in these communities.

Figure F-9 shows the portions of Coachella identified as R/ECAPs, with Census tracts labelled, alongside the location of schools, parks, and public transit routes. Coachella contains portions of two Census tracts identified as R/ECAP areas: Tract 456.09 and Tract 457.05.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-17 Figure F-9: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (2009 - 2013) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Tract 457.05
Tract 457.05 is more densely populated and entirely within City limits, allowing for a more accurate analysis of demographic characteristics as they relate to Coachella residents and fair housing problems. Table F-6 provides a summary of selected demographic characteristics and AFFH indicators for this tract.

Tract 456.09
Tract 456.09 covers two sections to the City’s south and east, with most of its area outside City boundaries. The portions of Tract 456.09 within the City are still sparsely-populated; as of 2022, the area between the Whitewater River and the Coachella Canal is almost entirely zoned for agricultural and commercial uses, while the area bisected by Highway 111 is zoned almost

Item 11.

F-18 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing entirely for manufacturing or heavy industrial use.1 There is limited transit access and schools in this tract. This tract’s R/ECAP status is likely the result of it containing several disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs) directly outside City limits (Shady Lane, Cocopah, Thermal, and Fillmore Street; also see Appendix B, Section A.3.5) and unpermitted, informal mobile home parks.2It also contains land owned by the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians including the Tribe’s Augustine Casino, Temalpakh Farm, Cahuilla Ranch event venue.3 Portions of Tract 456.09 within City limits are identified as priority expansion areas as Coachella continues to grow. For example, Coachella’s General Plan includes policy direction to prioritize new residential development in the “Central Coachella Neighborhoods” subarea, envisioning a series of walkable, interconnected communities with a mix of housing types and amenities.

However, for current residents, this portion of the City still has very limited access to local services and amenities, which continue to be concentrated in older, western neighborhoods west of Highway 86. The transition of land use in this area and its incorporation into the City’s mobility and open space networks will address these concerns.

Table F-6: R/ECAP Analysis of Census Tract 457.05
Selected Demographic Characteristics (2019)
Total Population 9,353
Total Households 3,249
Average Household Size 2.88
Hispanic or Latino Origin (of any race) 97.9%
Median Age 32.5
Owner-Occupied Housing Units 43.6%
Renter-Occupied Housing Units 51.8%
AFFH Indicators
Integration and Segregation
Median Income $31,582
Poverty Rate 35.9%
Low/Moderate-Income Population 74.5%
Non-White Population 98.9%
Disability Rate 7.7%
1 City of Coachella, Official Zoning Map,
https://www.coachella.org/home/showpublisheddocument/8840/638015980867630000 (2022) 2 City of Coachella, General Plan Update, Land Use + Community Character (2015) 3 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, About Us. https://augustinetribe-nsn.gov/about-us/

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-19 Table F-6: R/ECAP Analysis of Census Tract 457.05
Access to Opportunity
TCAC Opportunity Area Composite Score High Segregation & Poverty Job Proximity Index 3
CalEnviroScreen Score 54.1
Displacement Risk
Overcrowding Rate 25.0%
Renter Overpayment Rate 71.0%
Homeowner Overpayment Rate 47.1%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates
Tract 457.05 shares many demographic characteristics with tracts elsewhere in the City as shown in other subsections of this Appendix. Nearly all households in this tract are Hispanic or Latino (of any race) at 97.9 percent and earn a median household income of $31,582, well below the County median, with a poverty rate of 35.9 percent. Household tenure is slightly majority renter-occupied (51.8 percent), and though both renters and homeowners experience high housing cost overpayment rates, a greater proportion of renter households (71 percent) experience a housing cost burden (see Section F.2.5 below for further analysis).

In the General Plan, Tract 457.05 is included in the “West Coachella Neighborhoods” subarea, which has seen a significant number of homes and retail centers built in recent decades. However, while some neighborhoods within this subarea are more walkable and built on a traditional street grid, Tract 457.05 is characterized by a “patchwork” development pattern that includes conventional subdivisions and auto-oriented roadways, reducing overall connectivity. General Plan policy encourages infill development of vacant and underutilized parcels and the retrofit of existing neighborhoods to promote walkability, slow traffic, and increase access to parks and recreational opportunities.

During the 5th Cycle Housing Element Update, six projects were identified as already entitled and have since been completed. As shown below in Section F.3 (Sites Inventory), further parcels in Tract 457.05 are identified in the 6
th Cycle’s Sites Inventory. Appendix B (Sites Inventory & Methodology) explores the anticipated affordability categories of these parcels in greater detail, but their development in-line with General Plan policies will enhance the services and amenities in this tract, which already features close proximity to several schools, Bagdouma Park, and the Route 8 SunLine bus which connects the neighborhood to the rest of the City (and a transfer point Downtown).

Item 11.

F-20 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs) Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs) are neighborhoods in which there are both high concentrations of non-Hispanic White households and high household income rates.

Based on research from the University of Minnesota Humphrey School of Public Affairs, RCAAs are defined as census tracts where 80 percent or more of the population is white, and the median household income is $125,000 or greater (which is slightly more than double the national median household income in 2016).

However, HCD has adjusted the RCAA methodology in consideration of California’s higher levels of diversity by lowering the white population percentage threshold to 50 percent. According to 2010 data available from HCD for this evaluation and provided in Figure F-10, Coachella has two census tracts are that are predominantly (greater than 50 percent) white majority where the population percentage gap between the next largest racial group is 33 percent in the north and 8 percent in the west, but these areas do not contain median incomes above $125,000 (Figure F7). Therefore, no census tracts within Coachella meet the criteria to be considered a RCAA.

Figure F-10: White Majority Tracts (2010)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-21 F.2.4 Access to Opportunity
One important component of fair housing is a neighborhood’s access to opportunity, which correlates relative place-based characteristics of an area, such as education, employment, safety, and the environment, with critical life outcomes, such as health, wealth, and life expectancy.

Ensuring access to opportunity means both investing in existing low-income and underserved communities, as well as supporting residents’ mobility and access to ‘high resource’ neighborhoods.

In February 2017, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened the California Fair Housing Task Force to provide research and evidence-based policy recommendations to further HCD’s fair housing goals of (1) avoiding further segregation and concentration of poverty and (2) encouraging access to opportunity through land use policy and affordable housing, program design, and implementation.

HCD and TCAC prepared opportunity maps to identify census tracts with the highest and lowest resources. High resource areas are areas with high index scores for a variety of opportunity indicators. Examples of indicators of high resources areas include high employment rates, low poverty rates, proximity to jobs, high educational proficiency, and limited exposure to environmental health hazards.

High resources tracts are areas that offer low-income residents the best chance of a high quality of life, whether through economic advancement, high educational attainment, or clean environmental health. Census tracts in the city that are categorized as moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as the high resource areas but may have fewer job opportunities, lower performing schools, lower median home values, or other factors that lower their indexes across the various economic, educational, and environmental indicators.

Low resources areas are characterized as having fewer opportunities to employment and education, or a lower index for other economic, environmental, and educational indicators. These areas have greater quality of life needs and should be prioritized for future investment to improve opportunities for current and future residents.

The opportunity maps inform TCAC, which oversees the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program, to distribute funding more equitably for affordable housing in areas with the highest opportunity. The analysis evaluates total access to opportunity and categorizes this access as high, moderate, or low, but also individually assesses opportunity access across more specific indicators, such as education, transportation, economic development, and environment.

Item 11.

F-22 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing TCAC Opportunity Areas – Composite Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Composite Score provides an aggregate index of three domains: economic, education, and environmental. Census tracts with higher composite scores indicate higher resource and higher opportunity areas overall. Coachella contains four composite score categories: moderate resource, low resource, high segregation and poverty, and missing/insufficient data (Figure F-11). Composite scores are in the moderate resource category in northern and western areas of the city. The high segregation and poverty areas are located in the southwestern portions of the city. Composite scores generally increase from east to west in the region.

Figure F-11: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Composite Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-23 Economic Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Economic Score for a census tract is based on poverty, adult education, employment, job proximity, and median home value indicators. The score is broken up by quartiles, with the highest quartile indicating more positive economic outcomes and the lowest score indicating least positive outcomes. Most of the city’s census tracts are in the lowest economic score quartile of 0.0 to 0.25 as shown in Figure F-12, indicating less positive economic outcomes for residents. Northern and western portions of the city have economic scores in the

0.5 to 0.75 range. Scores are generally different in Coachella than in the areas adjacent to the city. Economic scores generally increase from east to west in the surrounding areas.

Figure F-12: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Economic Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-24 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Education Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Education Score for a census tract is based on math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rate, and student poverty rate indicators. The score is broken up by quartiles, with the highest quartile indicating more positive education outcomes and the lowest quartile signifying fewer positive outcomes. As shown in Figure F-13, the city mostly contains the lowest education score of less than 0.25 overall suggesting that students of various ages generally have less positive educational outcomes. One census tract in the northern portion of the city had education scores in the next higher quartile. Education scores are generally different in Coachella than in the areas to the east of the city with the scores generally increasing from east to west across the region.

Figure F-13: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Education Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-25 Environmental Score
Environmental scores for census tracts presented in Figure F-14 are based on 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Environmental Scores that reflect environmental risk. The scores are divided into quartiles with higher scores representing more positive environmental outcomes and lower scores indicating least positive environmental outcomes for residents living there. The city has a range of environmental scores with tracts in each quartile range indicating that residents are exposed to relatively higher or lower environmental risk factors depending on location (Figure F14). Environmental scores are relatively similar in Coachella when compared to the surrounding areas with the scores generally improving from east to west across the region.

Figure F-14: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Environmental Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-26 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Jobs Proximity Index
HUD’s Jobs Proximity Index for a census tract measures the area’s distance from employment.

This index can be used as a proxy to indicate relative transportation needs in a community. The score is broken up by quintiles, with the highest quintile representing areas closest to job centers.

The Jobs Proximity Index score is varied across Coachella. The score improves in the central portion to the highest quintile indicating relatively closer proximity to job centers as shown in Figure F-15.

Figure F-15: Jobs Proximity Index (HUD, 2014 - 2017)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Persons with Disabilities People with disabilities often experience challenges with accessibility, discrimination, and housing choice that make it difficult to find suitable housing to meet their needs. This section analyzes such disparities to ensure the City is able to adequately serve its residents with disabilities.

According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Figure A-23), the most common types of disabilities in Coachella in 2018 were ambulatory disabilities followed by cognitive disabilities.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-27 Disability categories are counted separately and are not mutually exclusive, as an individual may report more than one disability. An estimated 8.0 percent of Coachella residents (3,635 individuals) have a disability of some kind according to 2015 to 2019 ACS data.

The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides communitybased services to approximately 350,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of regional centers, developmental centers, and communitybased facilities. DDS also provides data on developmental disabilities by age and type of residence. According to DDS and as shown in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Table A-8), there are about 784 residents with a development disability in Coachella with most of them (717) able to live in their own home with their family or guardian.

There are a variety of housing types appropriate for people with disabilities, such as licensed and unlicensed single-family homes, group homes, and transitional and supportive housing. The design of housing-accessibility modifications, proximity to services and transit, and the availability of group living opportunities represent some of the types of considerations that are important in serving this need group. The Housing Constraints Appendix (Appendix C) discusses how the city permits various housing types, including the allowance for reasonable accommodations.

The Inland Regional Center facility in the vicinity of Coachella provides support and services to people with disabilities, enabling them to live at home. The Inland Regional Center is one of 21 regional centers in California that provide point of entry to services for people with developmental disabilities in Riverside and San Bernadino Counties. The center is a private, nonprofit community agency that contracts with local businesses to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.

Disparities in Access to Transportation Opportunities
The HUD Low Transportation Cost Index is based on estimates of transportation costs for a family that meets the following description: a three-person single-parent family with income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region. These estimates originate from the Location Affordability Index (LAI). Transportation costs are modeled for census tracts as a percent of income for renters in these households.

Index values are inverted, and percentile ranked nationally, with values ranging from 0 to 100.

Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs in that neighborhood. Transportation costs may be low within a tract for a range of reasons, including greater access to public transportation and the density of homes, services, and jobs in that area.

Figure F-16 shows the Transportation Cost Index ranges in Coachella. The city contains two ranges of the index, the 21 to 39 quintile in the western portions of the city and the 40 to 58 quintile in the remaining areas. The index values in the western census tracts range from 34 to 39 indicating that those areas of the city are estimated to have lower transportation costs than that percentage (34 to 39) of the nation. Transportation costs are somewhat lower in other areas of the city (with higher index values).

Item 11.

F-28 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-16: HUD Low Transportation Cost Index
Source: HUD Spatial Data
Figure F-17 shows bus transit routes operated by SunLine Transit Agency that connect the City with other communities throughout the Coachella Valley. These bus routes include Route 1EV (connecting Downtown Coachella with the Palm Desert Mall via Highway 111 to the west), Route 6 (connecting Downtown Coachella with Palm Desert mall via Fred Warring Drive to the west), and Route 8 (which zig-zags through Coachella and connects it to Indio to the north and Thermal/Mecca to the south). According to the 2023-2025 Short Range Transit Plan:
“Routes 1, 6, and 9 currently connect at the Transfer Terminal at Vine Avenue and Fifth Street in Coachella. There are plans to develop a Coachella Mobility Hub at Fourth Street and Cesar Chavez Street, to open in January 2024. The Mobility Hub would provide a residential development, bus laybys, passenger amenities, and connecting pedestrian and bicycle paths. Following completion of the Mobility Hub, the current routes at the Vine Avenue Transfer Terminal should be refocused to service the Coachella Mobility Hub.

Frequency on Route 1 is proposed to increase to every 15 minutes upon completion of

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-29 the mobility hub. Four additional buses have been procured to support this increased service on SunLine’s most productive route.”
Figure F-17: Transit Routes
The City’s existing bus routes provide moderate access to transit opportunities, especially for residents who need to commute to job centers elsewhere in the Coachella Valley. However, the Jobs Proximity Index illustrated above in Figure F-15 indicates that most populated regions of the City are still considered far from employment opportunities. Limited mobility options can have a greater impact on lower income populations and households who may not have access to alternate modes of transportation. Given the composition of Coachella, this means that lower income households and communities of color have limited transit access in Coachella. Continuing to implement General Plan policies related to infill development along key corridors will be essential to increasing the viability of new or expanded bus routes. For example, no cross-town bus routes currently link the City’s eastern and western neighborhoods, and such routes will be needed to connect the future neighborhood centers and industrial jobs centers envisioned by the General Plan, especially those east of Grapefruit Boulevard. A lack of transportation options throughout the City may otherwise restrict residents from accessing resources and opportunities not within their immediate neighborhoods.

Item 11.

F-30 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing F.2.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs
Overpayment
HUD defines overpayment, or “housing cost burden”, as households paying 30 percent or more of their gross income on housing expenses, including rent or mortgage payments and utilities.

Housing cost burden is considered a housing need because households that overpay for housing costs may have difficulty affording other necessary expenses, such as childcare, transportation, and medical costs.

Overpayment by Renters
Renters are more likely to overpay for housing costs than homeowners. As presented in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), 70.3 percent of renters in Coachella are cost-burdened. The percentage of renter households experiencing cost-burden is highest in a southern census tract at about 80.4 percent and is in the 60 to 80 percent range in most of the city according to 2015 - 2019 ACS data (Figure F-18). According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), approximately

55.3 percent of renters in the SCAG region are cost-burdened.

Figure F-18: Overpayment by Renters (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-31 Overpayment by Homeowners
Homeowners generally experience a lower rate of cost burden than renters. Figures F-19 shows the percentages of homeowners experiencing overpayment in the 2015 to 2019 time period according to ACS data. Percentages of homeowners experiencing overpayment are highest at about 82.7 percent in a central census tract and between 60 and 80 percent in two adjacent tracts.

Between 40 and 60 percent of homeowners are cost-burdened in most areas of the rest of the city.

Figure F-19: Overpayment by Owners (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Overcrowding
Overcrowding is defined by the Census as a unit in which more than one person occupies a room (excluding bathrooms and kitchens) while severe overcrowding occurs when more than 1.5 people occupy a room. Overcrowded households are an indicator of housing needs, as lower income families or individuals may choose to live together in smaller spaces to save money on housing costs.

Item 11.

F-32 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing In addition to the strain on residents’ mental health, overcrowding can also lead to more rapid deterioration of the property due to increased usage. According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS data,

4.6 percent of households in Coachella experienced overcrowding and 1.4 percent experienced severe overcrowding. The city’s overcrowding rates are about the same as Riverside County at

5.1 percent and the city’s severely overcrowded rate is also much lower than the county’s 1.8 percent (Table F-7).

Table F-7: Overcrowding and Severe Overcrowding Rates (2019) Coachella Riverside County
Occupants Per Room Units Percentage Percentage

1.01 to 1.5 705 4.6% 5.1%

1.51 or more 215 1.4% 1.8%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04
The distribution of overcrowded households in Coachella for the 2011 to 2015 time period are shown in Figure F-20. The map shows that overcrowding rates are highest in north-central and south-central census tracts, which are all above 20 percent. The statewide spatial data for severe overcrowding did not contain any values in the vicinity of Coachella as shown in Figure F-21.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-33 Figure F-20: Overcrowded Households (2011 – 2015)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-34 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-21: Severely Overcrowded Households (2011 – 2015) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Location Affordability Index
Figure F-22 shows the median gross rent across Coachella per HUD’s Location Affordability Index for the years 2012 to 2016. This index estimates household housing and transportation cost on a neighborhood-scale. These estimates show that most of the city has the lowest index value of less than $1,000. One census tract is between $1,000 and $1,500, and two tracts are between $1,500 and $2,000 per month.

This Needs Assessment (Appendix A) indicates the median monthly rent paid in Coachella in 2019 was $879 according to ACS 2015 to 2019 data. This rent amount is affordable to moderate income households but may be a cost-burden for lower-income households. It is less expensive to rent housing in Coachella than it is in Riverside County (Needs Assessment Appendix A, Figure A-24).

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-35 Figure F-22: Location Affordability (2012 – 2016)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Substandard Housing
Incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities can be used as a proxy to indicate substandard housing conditions. According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, 0.1 percent of Coachella households (17 units) lacked complete plumbing facilities and 0.3 percent of households (43 units) lacked complete kitchen facilities. Within Riverside County the number of households lacking each are 0.3 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively (Table F-8).

The age of housing stock can also be an indicator of substandard housing. As homes get older, there is a greater need for maintenance and repair. If not properly addressed, an aging housing stock can result in poorer living standards, incur more expensive repair costs and, under certain conditions, lower overall property values.

Coachella's housing stock is mostly newer than that of the SCAG region overall. According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), most of Coachella's housing units were built between 2000 and

Item 11.

F-36 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing 2009, representing approximately 64.1 percent of all housing units. The largest portion housing units in the SCAG region were built between 1970 to 1979.

Table F-8: Substandard Housing Rates (2019)
Coachella Riverside County
Substandard Condition Units Percentage Percentage
Lacking complete plumbing facilities 17 0.1% 0.3%
Lacking complete kitchen facilities 43 0.3% 0.7%
Source: ACS 5-year estimates 2015-2019, Table DP04
In the past 5 years, Coachella has received approximately 201 code complaints based on housing conditions. The majority of the complaints (>90 percent) were related to illegal, nonconforming buildings rather than substandard housing conditions. Assuming some overlap between housing complaints, the City conservatively assumes approximately 10 housing units in need of rehabilitation, which is less than 0.1 percent of the total housing stock (10,631 units). Housing complaints were not localized in any one part of the City.

On a qualitative basis, the City notes observable difference in the housing stock conditions based on the age of the structure and time the area developed. The City’s single family residential stock constructed before 1980 in neighborhoods in the Downtown area East of Cesar Chavez Street and in the Colonia Coachellita South of Avenue 52 and West of Cesar Chavez are in need of the most improvement according to windshield surveys by Code Enforcement Division staff; however, there are not any issues localized in any location. The single family residential housing stock constructed after 1980 are located mainly to the West of these older neighborhood were observed to be in good condition. Existing multi-family housing developments in the City were largely constructed after 1970 as affordable housing developments and some of these apartments have been refurbished or rebuilt. Coachella Community Homes, a 100 unit multi-family residential complex, located at 84720 Calle Rojo is owned by the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition and was constructed in 1969. The complex was rehabilitated in 2012. The Coachella Valley Apartments development at 84914 Bagdad Avenue consisted of 50 units of affordable multi-family housing was built in the 1970s and is currently being redeveloped as a 110-unit multi-family development by Community Housing Opportunities Corporation.

Displacement Risk
The University of California Berkeley’s Urban Displacement Project (UDP) uses data-driven research to produce maps identifying sensitive communities that are at-risk of displacement. UDP defines sensitive communities as currently having “populations vulnerable to displacement in the event of increased redevelopment and drastic shifts in housing cost”. Vulnerability was determined based on the following characteristics:
• The share of very low-income residents is above 20 percent:

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-37 AND
• The tract meets two of the following criteria:
o Share of renters is above 40 percent
o Share of people of color is above 50 percent
o Share of very low-income households that are severely rent burdened households is above the county median
o Percent change in rent is above county median rent increase o Rent gap, which is the difference between tract median rent and median rent for surrounding areas
UDP has identified vulnerable communities within city limits based on these criteria (Figure F-23).

Figure F-23: Vulnerable Communities (2017)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Item 11.

F-38 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Homelessness
Information on homelessness and City resources for homeless persons is provided in Section A.3.5 Special Housing Needs of the Needs Assessment (Appendix A).

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities to conduct a Point-in-Time (PIT) Count of individuals and families experiencing homelessness every two years in January. The most recent PIT for Riverside County was conducted in 2023 by the County of Riverside Continuum of Care (CoC). According to the most recent PIT, there were an estimated 74 persons experiencing homelessness in Coachella at that time.

The City PIT count discovered a pattern of unhoused individuals who were living in the 6th Street Downtown Area behind buildings likely due to the availability of public services, a City park and public restrooms in the area. Many unhoused individuals were found living along vacant land along the Union Pacific Railroad in areas screened by maintained landscaping or overgrown shrubs for screening. Unhoused individuals were identified along the commercial corridor at Cesar Chavez Street in well concealed areas at commercial center. A large community of unhoused individuals were identified within a mesquite forest area along Cal Trans right of way at the 86 Expressway. Lastly, unhoused individuals were found in vacant areas adjacent to the Love’s Truck Stop near the Interstate 10 freeway.

CV Housing First Program is overseen by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) to help homeless individuals and families find housing solutions which includes case management to help in the goals of permanent housing, programs and family reunification. The City of Coachella participates in this program and Code Enforcement Division staff contacts the CVAG program when homeless individuals are encountered to identify locations where services are needed.

The County of Riverside CoC is a network of private and public sector homeless service providers, designed to promote community-wide planning and the strategic use of resources to address homelessness. Coachella does not have any emergency shelters currently. There are two regionserving shelters in the neighboring community of Indio, which are the Coachella Valley Rescue Mission and Martha’s Village and Kitchen.

F.2.6 Other Relevant Factors
Rates of Homeownership by Race and Ethnicity
The homeownership rate is about 69 percent in Coachella compared to about 53 percent in the SCAG region overall. However, not all racial and ethnic groups have a similar probability of owning a home. The 2019 ACS data for percentages of occupied housing units by race in Coachella is presented in Table F-9. The rates of homeownership versus renting housing are very similar for each racial group. A group that has lower rates of homeownership are more at risk of being displaced due to rising rental prices.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-39 Table F-9: Housing Tenure by Race/Ethnicity in Coachella (2019) Race/Ethnicity
Renter Occupied Units Owner Occupied Units Total Occupied Units
Number % of Total Number % of Total
White alone, not Latino 867 19.6% 2,415 21.9% 3,282
Black or African American alone 24 0.5% 47 0.4% 71
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone 33 0.7% 74 0.7% 107
Asian alone 0 0.0% 66 0.6% 66
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander alone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
Some other race alone 3,489 79.1% 8,359 75.7% 11,848
Two or more races 0 0.0% 77 0.7% 77
Hispanic or Latino origin 4,303 97.5% 10,595 96.0% 14,898 Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S2502
One obstacle to home ownership is lack of access to the first tier of the financial system to obtain banking services and loans. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) provides the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) July 2021 census tract spatial data known as CRAMap 2021 (www.ffiec.gov/cra/). Included in the CRAMap 2021 spatial data is the Unbanked index which provides an estimate of households lacking access to the primary banking system.

This index estimates the likelihood of a household will lack both a savings and checking account with a bank, thrift, or credit union.

Figure F-23 presents the estimates for the percentages of households that lack access to banking and credit from the CRAMap 2021 Unbanked index. Identifying areas with relatively higher levels of residents without access to the primary banking system can facilitate the process of providing them first-tier financial services. This may aid lower income residents in avoiding a dependency on second-tier services, particularly predatory lenders.

As displayed in Figure F-24, estimates of households without access to primary banking and credit (unbanked) vary across the city. The western and eastern census tracts have the lowest estimates of unbanked households where the rates are 6 to 12 percent in those areas. Unbanked household estimates are higher in more central portions of the city ranging from 18 to 28 percent.

The highest unbanked percentage estimate of 31 percent is in the census tract centered at 52nd Avenue and Harrison Street/Cesar Chavez Street.

Item 11.

F-40 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-24: Percentage of Households without Access to Primary Banking System Source: FFIEC CRAMap 2021 Spatial Data
Historic Patterns
Other factors that contributed to housing conditions and local housing issues is the pattern of expansion of the City. When the City incorporated in the 1940s, it was comprised of the Downtown Area and the City slowly expanded outward with annexations of areas in agricultural production.

This pattern of growth an expansion contributed to the demographic and socio economic fabric of the Coachella community. This history is in contrast to the resort/country club patterns in the rest of the Coachella Valley which was largely developer driven and facilitated through Specific Plans.

To accommodate the agricultural community and service focused work force (see section below) the City has maintained land reserve for both single family and multi-family development. One of the earliest zoning maps on file at the City is from 1986, which allows for a mix of residential including single family, multi-family, and mobile home.

Local Data and Knowledge
A lot of contributing factors to the state of housing and fair housing related issues in Coachella can trace back to the development of the Coachella Valley and the regional economy. Between

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-41 the early 1950s and 2000s, the Coachella Valley experienced vacant desert land transition into leisure and resort communities driven by golf with exclusive gated country clubs. Development trended Eastward from Palm Springs and resulted in sprawling golf course communities that also spread prolifically into the City of La Quinta with 18 golf communities and to some extent in the City of Indio. Many service sector employees that service the leisure and resort communities located in areas with more affordable housing options in the cities of Indio and Coachella, that are not available in or characteristic of exclusive gated country club communities, and would therefore rely on long commutes westward to Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indians Wells, and La Quinta. Revenue generating uses like retail development and hotels concentrated in many of the leisure and resort communities like Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and La Quinta and resulted in a significant amount of retail revenue leakage from the City of Coachella and therefore a smaller revenue base to fund key services than is characteristic of wealthier surrounding cities.

F.2.7 Summary of Fair Housing Issues
Access to opportunity in Coachella is low for some portions of the city and other areas are subject to racial segregation as evidenced by evidenced by TCAC Opportunity Areas Composite Scores (Figure F-11) and the presence of R/ECAPs (Figure F-9) within the city. Many areas of the city exhibit overpayment by renters and owners (Figures 18 and 19) and households in these areas are subject to higher levels of overcrowding (Figure F-20). A wide area of the city also contains sensitive communities that are vulnerable to displacement (Figure F-23). Additionally, many households are estimated to lack access to the primary banking system (Figure F-24).

The primary fair housing issue in Coachella is segregation and integration due to the presence of R/ECAPs and high segregation and poverty TCAC Composite Scores. The contributing factor to this primary issue is land use and zoning laws limiting where multifamily housing can be built. This contributing factor is evident due to the high levels of overpayment by homeowners and renters and high levels of overcrowding in those same areas. This evidence suggests that households of various sizes and characteristics would choose more affordable housing if available.

The secondary fair housing issue in Coachella is racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty due to the combination of R/ECAPs and sensitive communities in the same neighborhoods. The contributing factor to this primary issue is displacement of residents due to economic pressures because of disadvantaged households facing housing insecurity and economic hardship.

The third fair housing issue is disproportionate housing needs because of the contributing factor of a lack available affordable units in a range of sizes. High levels of overpayment by renters and homeowners in the city indicates that many residents are struggling to afford housing costs.

The fourth fair housing issue is disparities in access to opportunity due to the high estimates for the number of unbanked households in most of the city’s census tracts. The contributing factor to

Item 11.

F-42 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing this issue is access to financial services because those unbanked households will be unable to obtain financial services from the primary banking system.

Section F.3 Sites Inventory
AB 686 requires a jurisdiction’s site inventory to be consistent with its duty to affirmatively further fair housing. This section evaluates the City’s site inventory locations against various measures in the Assessment of Fair Housing that includes income level, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, access to opportunity, and environmental risk to determine any socio-economic patterns or implications.

Figure F-25 shows all Census tracts within the City. Table F-10 provides a Census tract-level summary of all RHNA units relative to a variety of characteristics that impact fair housing.

Figure F-25: Coachella Census Tracts

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-43 Table F-10: Census Tract Analysis Summary
Census
Tract
Existing
HH
RHNA Capacity
AFFH Indicators
Integration and Segregation Access to Opportunity Displacement Risk Lower Mod Above
Mod
Median
Income
Poverty
Rate
Low /
Mod
Income
Pop
NonWhite
Pop.

Disability
Rate
Resource
Designation
Job
Proximity
Index
CalEnviroScreen
Score Overcrowding Renter Overpayment
Homeowner
Overpayment
452.22 1,324 0 0 0
$35,208
-
$90,074

14.6% 22.42% 34.67% 9.2% Moderate 38 34.0 0.0% 53.8% 48.8% 452.26 2,654 0 0 304
$48,355
-
$53,047

9.2% 53.73% 95.76%-

96.32% 4.6% Moderate 3 - 5 23.8 7.0% 78.3% 56.9%
456.06 1,876 240 0 181
$64,271
-
$83,750

8.2% 16.78% 55.20% 11.2% Moderate 44 17.5 1.0% 53.0% 59.2% 456.09 1,907 262 0 611
$11,354
-
$42,969

34.9% 63.59%

90.99%
-

98.51%

13.3% Insufficient
Data 38 - 98 65.8 18.0% 65.3% 47.5%
457.03 2,938 506 1044 264
$30,962
-
$33,859

17.3% 68.18%

98.93%
-

99.09%

7.1% Low
Resource 7 - 10 77.1 21.0% 80.4% 67.0%
457.04 1,469 94 0 62 $23,250 33.9% 71.29% 99.18% 12.3%
High
Segregation
& Poverty
3 66.0 26.0% 59.7% 82.7%
457.05 3,412 183 85 871 $31,582 35.9% 74.50% 98.94% 7.7% High
Segregation
& Poverty
3 54.1 25.0% 71.0% 47.1%
457.06 1,939 100 309 3101
$23,175
-
$35,233

29.5% 70.63%

99.31%
-

99.47%

11.8%
High
Segregation
& Poverty
5 - 11 80.8 15.0% 69.7% 45.5%
457.07 2,701 699 24 50
$23,565
-
$34,779

21.0% 59.55%

97.24%
-

98.40%

9.6% Low 2 75.1 8.0% 72.6% 62.7%
469.00 856 0 0 0 $40,887 24.7% 62.25% 64.01% 15.3% Low 3 66.0 5.0% 29.5% 26.2% 9404.00 2,815 261 6 745
$24,028
-
$48,576

16.0% 58.33%

93.22%
-

99.05%

8.0% Low 4 - 13 81.4 20.0% 60.1% 57.1%

Item 11.

F-44 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing F.3.1 Potential Effects on Patterns of Segregation
A comparison of a jurisdiction’s site inventory against its LMI population and R/ECAP area can reveal if the city’s accommodation of housing is exacerbating or ameliorating segregation and social inequity. Figure F-26 shows the locations of Coachella’s sites inventory relative to LMI population percentages, and Figure F-27 shows the distributions of city and site areas relative to LMI population percentages.

The city contains two LMI percentage categories, less than 25 percent and 50 to 75 percent LMI households. The lowest category covers six percent of city area and contains five percent of the site inventory area (Figure F-26). The other LMI percentage category represents most of the city area at 94 percent and contains 95 percent of site inventory area. The site inventory is therefore not anticipated to exacerbate fair housing issues with regard to LMI households because the distribution of sites parallels LMI population percentages within in the city.

Figure F-26: Sites Inventory and LMI Households
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
City of Coachella | F-45
Figure F-27: Percentage of City and Sites Areas across Low to Moderate Income Populations Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC
Figures F-28 and F-29 display the site inventory and city areas associated with R/ECAPs. The amounts of city and site inventory areas that are within and outside R/ECAPs are similar. Thirtytwo percent of city area consists of R/ECAPs compared to 27 percent of site inventory area. The portion of city area not within a R/ECAP is 68 percent and the site inventory portion outside of a R/ECAP is 73 percent.

At the scale of individual Census tracts, there is little indication that the distribution of Sites satisfying lower-income RHNA will exacerbate patterns of segregation in the City. Census tracts entirely within the City are relatively similar in terms of the AFFH indicators summarized in Table F-10, best visualized by Figure F-23 showing these tracts identified as “Vulnerable” by the UC Berkeley Urban Displacement Project’s methodology. Those tracts with a higher median income than most of the City (i.e., Tract 452.22) or a lower poverty rate (i.e., Tract 456.06) include many households outside City limits.

To illustrate, Tracts 457.03 and 457.07 host the greatest amount of lower-income RHNA capacity, 506 units and 699 units respectively. Compared to other tracts entirely within City limits, the poverty rate and percentage of LMI households in these tracts is slightly lower than adjacent ones.

Tracts with both the highest poverty rate and LMI household figures in the City (i.e., Tracts 457.04 and 457.05) host a RHNA mix of lower-, moderate-, and above moderate-income units.

Overall, RHNA capacity is relatively well-distributed throughout the City, not isolated in any one location within the City, with mixed-income development slated to occur in tracts where the greatest amount of land is available (e.g., Tracts 457.06, 457.05, and 457.03) and related General Plan implementation is anticipated to benefit both new and existing residents. 6 0
94 0
5 0
95 0
0 25
50 75
100
<25% 25 - 50% 50% - 75% 75% - 100%
Percentage of Total Area
Low to Moderate Income Population Percentages
Percentage of City Area Percentage of Site Inventory Area

Item 11.

F-46 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-28: Sites Inventory and R/ECAPs (2009 – 2013)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
City of Coachella | F-47
Figure F-29: Percentage of City and Sites Areas across R/ECAP Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC
F.3.2 Potential Effects on Access to Opportunity
Figure F-30 shows sites inventory locations across the city’s TCAC Opportunity Area Composite Scores. As previously noted, Coachella contains four composite score categories: moderate resource, low resource, high segregation and poverty, and missing/insufficient data. The sites inventory is present within all four categories and the amount of site area in each category is discussed next.
68 32
73 27
0 25
50 75
100
0 - Not a R/ECAP 1 - R/ECAP Area
Percentage of Total Area
Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) Percentage of City Area Percentage of Site Inventory Area

Item 11.

F-48 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-30: Sites Inventory and TCAC Composite Score
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC
Figure F-31 shows the distribution of Coachella sites across the TCAC Opportunity Area Composite Score categories. Moderate resource regions constitute 13 percent of city area and eight percent of site inventory area. Most of the city area is within the low resource category at 74 percent while the portion of site area within this category is 37 percent. Most of the site inventory area is located within high segregation and poverty areas at 55 percent. Due to these disparities in area distribution, the site inventory may tend to exacerbate fair housing trends regarding access to opportunities. The three census tracts that are within high segregation and poverty areas (Tracts 457.04, 457.05, and 457.06) are estimated to accommodate 4,805 units. However; the majority of the housing growth is expected in the moderate and above moderate income categories, with only 7 percent (377 units) of the sites expected for low income. The missing/insufficient data category contains 38 and six percent of city and sites inventory area, respectively.

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
City of Coachella | F-49
Figure F-31: Percentage of City and Sites Areas across TCAC Opportunity Areas Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC
Figure F-32 shows the sites inventory locations across the city’s CalEnviroScreen scores. The city contains seven CalEnviroScreen scores. The lowest score range is 11 to 20 percent (decile score two) risk of exposure to environmental hazards and the highest range signifies 81 to 90 percent (decile score nine) risk of exposure to environmental hazards. The CalEnviroScreen percentage score of 61 to 70 percent (decile score seven) covers the majority of city area.

Figure F-33 shows the distribution of sites across the range of CalEnviroScreen scores represented as deciles (one to 10). CalEnviroScreen decile seven (61 to 70 percent risk level) encompasses 66 percent of city area and onlyeight percent of the sites inventory area. The CalEnviroScreen decile score with the largest percentage of site inventory area is nine (71 to 80 percent risk level) with 37 percent of the inventory area. This score encompasses approximately 14 percent of city area. The next lowest decile score of eight contains seven percent of city area and 27 percent of the site inventory area. As a result of these differences, the site inventory may tend to exacerbate fair housing issues regarding exposure to environmental hazards. 0 0 0
13 74
13 38
0 0 0
8 37
55 6
0 25
50 75
100

1. Highest
Resource

2. High
Resource

3. Moderate
Resource
(Rapidly
Changing)

4. Moderate
Resource

5. Low
Resource

6. High
Segregation
& Poverty

7. Missing /
Insufficient
Data
Percentage of Total Area
TCAC Composite Score
Percentage of City Area Percentage of Site Inventory Area

Item 11.

F-50 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-32: Sites Inventory and CalEnviroScreen Score
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
City of Coachella | F-51
Figure F-33: Percentage of City and Sites Areas across CalEnviroScreen Scores Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data and LWC
Section F.4 Contributing Factors and Meaningful
Actions
Table F-11 lists the most prevalent fair housing issues and its corresponding contributing factors for the City of Coachella, as prioritized through the findings from the above assessment.

Table F-11: Contributing Factors
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor Priority
Segregation and Integration Land use and zoning laws 1
Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Displacement of residents due to economic pressures
2 Disproportionate Housing Needs Availability of affordable units in a range of sizes 3
Disparities in Access to Opportunity Access to financial services 4 Table F-12 consists of proposed housing programs the City will pursue to specifically overcome identified patterns and trends from the above assessment and proactively affirmatively further fair housing in Coachella. Many of the programs listed below target specific locations throughout the City of Coachella, such as single-family neighborhoods, downtown, near transit, highest resource areas, or areas with the most racial or ethnic segregation. These targeted, place-based programs are indicated with an asterisk (*). All programs (actions) in the Housing Element include objectives (metrics) and timelines (milestones) for implementation. See Section IV Housing Plan for more information on goals, policies, and programs.
0 2 3 4
0 4
66 7
14 0 0
5 3 0 0
21 8
27 37
0 0
25 50
75 100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Percentage of Total Area
CalEnviroScreen Score
Percentage of City Area Percentage of Site Inventory Area (Lowest Risk) (Highest Risk)

Item 11.

F-52 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Table F-12: Meaningful Actions
Contributing
Factor
AFFH
Strategy Housing Implementation Programs
Land use and
zoning laws
Modify land
use and zoning
laws to be less
restrictive

1.5 Lot Consolidation

1.7 Large Sites

1.13 General Plan Map Amendments

4.2 Reasonable Accommodation

5.1 Zoning Code Constraints

5.2 Development Fees

5.3 Parking Requirements

5.4 Eliminate Minimum Dwelling Unit Size Requirement

5.5 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

5.6 Transitional and Supportive Housing

5.7 Manufactured Housing

5.8 Group Homes

5.9 Single-Room Occupancy Housing

6.7 Streamlined Approvals
Displacement of
residents due to
economic
pressures
New Housing
Choices and
Affordability in
more areas of
the City

1.1 General Plan Implementation

1.2 Lower Income Site Rezoning

1.3 General Plan Text Amendment

1.4 Services and Facilities

1.14 AB2339 Code Amendments

5.11 Prioritize Sewer Hookups for Residential Development For Lowerincome

5.12 Objective Design Standards

6.1 Development Fee Deferral

6.2 Affordable Unit Financing*

6.4 Density Bonus

6.6 Infrastructure Grants *

6.8 Place-Based Neighborhood Revitalization *
Availability of
affordable units
in a range of
sizes
Provide Choice
of Different
Affordable
Housing Types

1.8 Variety of Housing Options for Special Needs Groups

1.9 Emergency Shelters

1.10 Farmworker Housing Support

5.5 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

5.6 Transitional and Supportive Housing

5.7 Manufactured Housing

5.8 Group Homes

5.9 Single-Room Occupancy Housing

5.10 Farmworker Housing Strategies
Access to
financial services
Provide
Information
Regarding
housing and
funding options
to Educate and

1.12 Accessory Dwelling Units Outreach *

2.1 Rehabilitation Programs *

2.7 Tenant Outreach *

4.1 Fair Housing

Item 11.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
City of Coachella | F-53
Table F-12: Meaningful Actions
Contributing
Factor
AFFH
Strategy Housing Implementation Programs
revitalize
Community

6.5 Website Update

7.1 Housing Choice Vouchers

7.2 At-Risk Housing

Item 11.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
651 Bannon Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
May 19, 2025
Kendra Reif, Principal Planner
Development Services Department
City of Coachella
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
Dear Kendra Reif:

RE: City of Coachella’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Zoning Amendments and Housing Element
Thank you for submitting the City of Coachella’s (City) draft zoning amendments (Amendments) that were received for review May 15, 2025. The Amendments are intended to revise Ordinance 1204 and meet statutory requirements related to rezoning to accommodate the lower-income regional housing need allocation (RHNA). Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review.

On December 1, 2023, HCD found the adopted housing element met the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law (Gov. Code, § 65580 et seq). However, the housing element could not be found in substantial compliance until the City has adopted and completed necessary rezones to accommodate the RHNA and comply with various statutory requirements pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1)(A) and 65583.2, subdivisions (c), (h) and (i). Upon review of the Amendments, HCD is pleased to find the Amendments address the requirements that were described in HCD’s December 1,2023 review. The housing element will substantially comply with State Housing Element Law (Gov. Code, § 65580 et seq) once the Amendments are adopted, submitted to, and approved by HCD, in accordance with Government Code section 65585.

As a reminder, the City’s 6th cycle housing element was due October 15, 2021. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City’s 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to revise the element as described above, adopt, and submit to HCD to regain housing element compliance.

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill

Item 11.

Kendra Reif, Principal Planner

(SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant, the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program, and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation at:
https://www.lci.ca.gov/planning/general-plan/guidelines.html.

HCD appreciates the dedication and effort the City’s housing element team provided throughout the housing element update and zoning amendments. HCD is committed to assisting the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Jose Armando Jauregui, of our staff, at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Paul McDougall
Senior Program Manager

Item 11.

STAFF REPORT
9/10/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Andrew Simmons, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to file a Notice of Completion for City Project No. ST-93 Avenue 50 Street and Median Improvements-Phase 1
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the City Project No. ST-93 Avenue 50 Street and Median Improvements-Phase 1 as complete and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion attached hereto with the County of Riverside.

BACKGROUND:

On September 11, 2024, the City of Coachella acted to authorize a construction contract with Urban Habitat in the amount $3,307,524.42 plus 10% contingency for the Avenue 50 Street and Median Improvements Phase 1, City Project No.ST-93.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

City Staff has inspected the Project and found the improvements to be in accordance with the plans, specifications, and applicable standards. Staff recommends the acceptance of this project and that the City Council authorizes the filing of a Notice of Completion. Upon acceptance by City Council, the Project will enter a one-year warranty period as prescribed by the project contract agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact. The project was included in the City’s approved CIP FY 2024/25 budget. The project was constructed within budget including all Change Orders and Quantity Adjustments totaling $3,334,573.98 and will be reimbursed at 75% CVAG ($2,500,930.49), and 25% City ($833,643.49). The City’s allocation is funded by Fund 185 (Developer Deposit) in the amount of $195,521.79, Fund 117 (Measure A) in the amount of $500,000 and Fund 109 (SB1) in the amount of $138,121.71. With this action, City Council authorized the appropriation of these funds.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Notice of Completion

Item 12.

To be recorded with County Recorder
within 10 days after completion and
Acceptance. No recording fee.

When Recorded, return to:

Delia Granados, Deputy City Clerk
City of Coachella
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236 (For Recorders Use)
Notice of Completion
(California Civil Code Section 3093 - Public Works)
Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State of California that a public work improvement described as Avenue 50 Street and Median Improvements-Phase 1, City Project No.ST-93 has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date hereof.

The street and median improvements are located within City right-of-way on various areas located within the City of Coachella.

The contractor on such work was Urban Habitat and the surety on his bond is Developers Surety and Indemnity Company located at 59 Maiden Lane, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10038.

The real property upon which said work was performed is in the City of Coachella, County of Riverside, and State of California.

The nature of the interest of the owner is in fee.

Date: September 10, 2025 City of Coachella
(Date of Acceptance) (Name of Political Subdivision)
Owner Address:
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
By:________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez
Title: _________Mayor_________
State of California) City of Coachella
) ss
County of Riverside)
I hereby certify that I am the Deputy City Clerk of the governing board of the City of Coachella, the political subdivision which executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification; that I have read said notice, know its contents, and that the same is true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Coachella , California on (Date)
(City Where Signed)
________________________________
Delia Granados, Deputy City Clerk, City of Coachella County Counsel Form 1 (Rev. 5-64)

Item 12.

STAFF REPORT
9/10/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Andrew Simmons, P.E. – Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Supplemental Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and the City of Coachella for the Arts and Music Line Project, City Project ST-140.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute the Supplemental Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company for the Arts and Music Line Project, City Project ST-140.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) is the lead agency for the proposed Avenue 48 Arts and Music Line (Arts and Music Line Project) improvements and has contracted with Webb and Associates to design the project. On October 20th, 2022, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) staff announced that CVAG was recommended for a 36.483 million dollar grant for the Arts and Music line. The project is currently in the plans, specifications and engineer’s estimates (PS&E) and Right-of-Way (R/W) phases. This supplemental agreement is required to be able to complete the proposed improvements along the Dillon Road Grade Separation between Avenue 48 and Cabazon Avenue.

BACKGROUND:

The Arts and Music Line is a pedestrian and bicycle community connector to the CV Link and located primarily along Avenue 48. The eastern end will extend along Dillon Road to the Spotlight 29 Casino. The western end will extend to Washington Street. The Arts and Music Line proposes improvements to the Dillon road grade separation that requires this supplemental agreement. This will authorize the proposed improvements and future maintenance for the Arts and Music Line on the Dillon Road Grade Separation from the Union Pacific Railroad Company.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact. The proposed improvements have been included in the FY 25/26 CIP Budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Supplemental Agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Company

Item 13.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Form Approved: AVP-Law 01/21/2013
UPRR Project No.: 0593197

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
_______________________________________
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Supplement”) is made as of the ______ day of ______________, 20___, by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (“Railroad”) and CITY OF COACHELLA (“Political Body”), a municipal corporation of the State of California to be addressed at 53990 Enterprise Way, Coachella, California 92236.

RECITALS:

By instrument dated January 31, 2001, Railroad and the Political Body entered into a New Public Highway Crossing Agreement identified as the Railroad’s Folder No. 0189265, UPRR Audit No. 219292 (the “2001 Agreement”) covering the construction of a new grade separated structure (the “Structure”) that will carry vehicular traffic traversing on Dillon Road over Railroad’s tracks at DOT Number 748449W, Railroad’s Milepost 613.03 on Railroad’s Yuma Subdivision at or near Coachella, Riverside County, California (the “Crossing Area”) as shown on the Railroad Survey Print attached to the 2001 Agreement.

The Political Body is undertaking improvements to the Structure and has requested a Supplemental Agreement to include the Exhibit A-2 type, size and location prints of the Structure to the 2001 Agreement.

AGREEMENT:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 - AMENDMENT OF THE 2023 AGREEMENT
The 2001 Agreement Recitals are amended to include the Political Body’s type, size and location prints of the Structure marked Exhibit A-2, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit A-2 to the 2001 Agreement, which shall be, and hereby is amended to include the attached Exhibit A-2.

SECTION 2 - AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL
This agreement is supplemental to the 2001 Agreement, as herein amended, and nothing herein contained shall be construed as amending or modifying the same except as herein specifically provided.

Item 13.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Form Approved: AVP-Law 01/21/2013
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplement to be executed in duplicate as of the date first herein written.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
(Federal Tax ID No. 94-6001323)
By_______________________________________
Printed Name:______________________________________
Title:_____________________________________________

CITY OF COACHELLA
By_______________________________________
Printed Name:______________________________________
Title:_____________________________________________

Item 13.

EXHIBIT A-2
TO

PUBLIC HIGHWAY UNDERPASS AGREEMENT
Exhibit A-2 will be the Political Body’s type, size and location prints of the Structure.

Item 13.

INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 1 269 GI 0000 TITLE SHEET ARTS & MUSIC LINE GENERAL SHEETS Page 389 Item 13.

GENERAL NOTES UTILITY AGENCIES 1. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CITY, OWNER AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. 2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES REPORTED OR FOUND IN PUBLIC RECORDS(MAINLINE, NO LATERALS OR SERVICES SHOWN), ARE INDICATED WITH THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND EXTENT. THE OWNER, BY ACCEPTING THESE PLANS OR PROCEEDING WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS HEREON, AGREES TO ASSUME LIABILITY AND HOLD THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT REPORTED OR INDICATED ON PUBLIC RECORDS, OR THOSE CONSTRUCTED IN VARIANCE WITH REPORTED OR RECORD LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER FOUND AT THE SITE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNERS OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CONCERNED BEFORE STARTING WORK. 3. THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR ANY UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THIS PLANS MUST BE REQUESTED IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 4. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON AT THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THERE BE ANY DISCREPANCY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AT ONCE. REVISIONS AND/OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH REVISION OR DEVIATION IN THE FIELD. BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION MEANS ACCEPTANCE OF THIS CONDITIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT" AT (800) 422-4133 AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF WORK SO AS TO HAVE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED AND MARKED FOR CONSTRUCTION / SAFETY COORDINATION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AN REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER ACT. NOTICE TO CONTRACTROR 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, GRADES, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. ALL DISCREPANCIES OR QUESTIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CVAG CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 2. ALL EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED. ANY DAMAGED ITEMS SHALL BE FULLY REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE FULL SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 3. ALL WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SUPERCEDE ALL SCALED DISTANCES AND DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FROM THE FACE OF THE BUILDING, WALL, BACK OF CURB, EDGE OF WALK PROPERTY LINE, OR CENTERLINE OF OBJECT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL CURVES AND ALL TRANSITIONS BETWEEN CURVES AND STRAIGHT EDGES SHALL BE SMOOTH. 5. STATIONING HERON IS ALONG CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR INDICATED. 6. EXCAVATION MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE SIDECAST INTO WHITEWATER CHANNEL OR ADJACENT PERCOLATION PONDS. CONTRACTOR TO STOCKPILE OUTSIDE OF ALL CHANNELS AND PONDS. 7. ALL PATHS TO MEET OR EXCEED ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN. PATH CROSS SLOPE TO NOT EXCEED 2.0%. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CCS83, ZONE 6, BASED LOCALLY ON CONTROL STATIONS “DSSC”, “P486”, AND “SLMS” NAD 83(NSRS2011) AS SHOWN HEREON. ALL BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE GRID. QUOTED BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FROM REFERENCE MAPS OR DEEDS ARE AS SHOWN PER THAT RECORD REFERENCE. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. GRID DISTANCES, MAY BE OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING THE GROUND DISTANCE BY A COMBINATION FACTOR OF 0.999975768. CALCULATIONS ARE MADE AT POINT #1 WITH COORDINATES OF: N: 2192253.712, E: 6562480.792, USING AN ELEVATION OF 43.77 FEET. THE CONVERGENCE ANGLE AT POINT #1 IS 000°00'05.29". NGS DESIGNATION #3 LL (PID #DX0672) ELEV. = -42.88 (NAVD88) RECOVERY NOTE BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1988 RECOVERED IN GOOD CONDITION. NEW DESCRIPTION FOLLOWS. 2.4 KM (1.50 MI) SOUTHEAST ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 111 FROM THE JUNCTION OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 10 BUSINESS ROUTE (INDIO AVENUE) IN INDIO, THENCE 1.1 KM (0.70 MI) NORTHEAST ALONG DILLON ROAD, IN THE SOUTHEAST ABUTMENT OF A BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER, 5.0 M (16.4 FT) SOUTHEAST OF THE ROAD CENTERLINE. [THE ELEVATION PER THIS SURVEY WAS ADJUSTED UP BY 500.00 FEET TO AVOID NEGATIVE ELEVATION]. BENCHMARK DATA BASIS OF BEARING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (909) 335-7883 VERIZON - PALM SPRINGS (760) 778-3603 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (760) 202-4229 TIME WARNER CABLE (760) 250-6942 DESERT WATER AGENCY (760) 323-4971 COACHELLA WATER DISTRICT (760) 398-2651 INDIO WATER AUTHORITY (760) 391-4038 VALLEY SANITARY DISTRICT (760) 238-5400 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (760) 335-3640 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATIONS OF GOVERNMENT (760) 346-1127 AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 4 269 GI 0003 GENERAL NOTES ARTS & MUSIC LINE GENERAL SHEETS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page 390 Item 13.

ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND A.B.C. ACASPH B.B.C. BCBCR BLDG BPBTM CBC&G CIP C/L, CL COCONC AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE BEGIN CURVE BEGIN CURB RETURN BUILDING BEGINNING PROJECT (ALIGNMENT) BOTTOM CATCH BASIN CURB AND GUTTER CAST-IN-PLACE CENTER LINE CLEANOUT CONCRETE CONDTS CONDUITS CONT DELTA CONTINUOUS CR-GUT CROSS GUTTER DDEMO DET DIA D/WDWG (E) EAC EBECECR EGELELEV EOC DEMOLITION DETAIL DIAMETER DRIVEWAY DRAWING EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EASTBOUND END CURVE END CURB RETURN EXISTING GRADE ELECTRIC ELEVATION EDGE OF CONCRETE EP, EOP END OF PROJECT (ALIGNMENT) EDGE OF PAVEMENT EPB EQ. ETW EVLT EWFGFHFLFND FSGBGVGRND ELECTRIC PULL BOX EQUAL EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY ELECTRIC VAULT EACH WAY FINISH GRADE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW LINE FOUND FINISH SURFACE GRADE BREAK GAS VALVE GROUND HH-MM-SS HOUR, MINUTES, SECONDS (ANGLE) HMAC HPIEJLLF HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE HIGH POINT INVERT ELEVATION JUNCTION LEFT, LENGTH LINEAL FOOT/FEET PCPI PCC PCR PT LPLTMAX MIN MHMWNIC OC PCC PCCP PPPTRRSP RTSSDSFSHT STA S/WTBD TBV TELVLT TYP LOW POINT LEFT MAXIMUM MINIMUM MANHOLE MONITORING WELL NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT POWER POLE POINT RIGHT, RADIUS ROCK-LINED SLOPE PROTECTION RIGHT SLOPE STORM DRAIN SQUARE FOOT SHEET STATION SIDEWALK TO BE DETERMINED TO BE VERIFIED TELEPHONE VAULT TYPICAL UC, U/C UNDERCROSSING UVLT WB w/ UTILITY VAULT WESTBOUND WITH Ø or DIA DIAMETER ABBREVIATIONS HORIZONTAL CURVES POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF INTERSECTION POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE POINT OF REVERSE CURVE POINT OF TANGENCY ABBREVIATIONS BVCE BVCS EVCE EVCS KLVC PVI VERTICAL CURVES BEGINNING VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION BEGINNING VERTICAL CURVE STATION END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION END VERTICAL CURVE STATION RATE OF CURVATURE LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION ABBREVIATIONS CPS CVWD RCFC CITY OF PALM SPRINGS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WCD AND WATER CONTROL DISTRICT U.P.R.R UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD AGENCY ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT SPECIFIC CCWWBP CATHEDRAL CITY WHITEWATER BIKE PATH CV LINK COACHELLA VALLEY MULTI-USE PATH CVS NEV WRS COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE WHITEWATER RIVER STORMWATER CHANNEL UTILITY VAULT GATE RIGHT-OF-WAY STREET CENTERLINE STORM HEADWALL TREE PALM SAGUARO CACTUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL POST STREET LIGHT UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE SIGN SIGN - DOUBLE POST SIGN - ENTRY/BILLBOARD FLAG POLE CENTERLINE KEY NOTE NORTH ARROW CABLE EXISTING FENCE RETAINING WALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT CURB / CURB & GUTTER WALL PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT WEBB N W E S# AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 5 269 GI 0004 LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS ARTS & MUSIC LINE GENERAL SHEETS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: PAVEMENT REMOVAL AC OVERLAY MEDIAN REMOVAL REMOVAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT SAWCUTLINE TELECOM OVERHEAD ELECTRIC BURIED ELECTRIC FIBER OPTIC 6" FORCE MAIN SEWER 12" FORCE MAIN SEWER 18" FORCE MAIN SEWER 2" GAS 3" GAS 4" GAS 6" GAS 8" GAS GAS (UNKNOWN SIZE) IRRIGATION LINE OVERHEAD UTILITY 4" SEWER 8" SEWER 10" SEWER 12" SEWER 15" SEWER 18" SEWER 21" SEWER 24" SEWER 27" SEWER 30" SEWER SEWER (UNKNOWN SIZE) ABANDONED 8" SEWER ABANDONED 10" SEWER ABANDONED 12" SEWER 12" STORM DRAIN 18" STORM DRAIN 24" STORM DRAIN 36" STORM DRAIN 42" STORM DRAIN 48" STORM DRAIN 54" STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN (UNKNOWN SIZE) TELEPHONE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONDUIT 6" WATER 8" WATER 10" WATER 12" WATER 16" WATER 18" WATER 24" WATER WATER (UNKNOWN SIZE) ABANDONED 8" WATER ABANDONED 12" WATER RECYCLED WATER LINE EX 12''SD EX 18''SD EX 24''SD EX 36''SD EX 54''SD 42''SD 48''SD EX SD EX T TS EX 6''W EX 8''W EX 10''W EX 12''W EX 16''W EX 18''W EX 24''W EX W 8''W ABAN 12''W ABAN EX CATV COM OHE EX E FO6''FM 12''FM 18''FM EX 2''G EX 3''G EX 4''G EX 6''G EX 8''G EX GIRR OHU EX RW EX 8''S EX 10''S EX 12''S EX 15''S EX 18''S EX 21''S 4''SS 24''SS 27''SS 30''SS EX SS 8''SS ABAN 10''SS ABAN 12''SS ABAN Page 391 Item 13.

BEAR CREEK TRAIL CALLE TAMPICO AVENUE 50 E I S E N H OW E R D R I V E WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 48

ADAMS STREET

DUNE PALMS
ROAD

JEFFERSON STREET
LA QUINTA EVACUATION CHANNEL HIGHWAY 111

MONROE STREET

MADISON STREET

HJORTH STREET

JACKSON STREET

CALHOUN STREET

VAN BUREN STREET

DILLON ROAD
INDIO BOULEVARDHIGHWAY 86 INTERSTATE 10 AVENUE 50 AVENUE 50 AVENUE 48 AVENUE 48 AVENUE 48 AVENUE 49 AVENUE 49

MADISON STREET

JEFFERSON STREET
WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 52 AVENUE 50

MONROE STREET
JACKSON STREET AVENUE 51

OASIS STREET
ARABIA STREET HIGHWAY 111 MILES AVENUE MILES AVENUE FRED WARING AVENUE FRED WARING AVENUE AVENUE 46 DR. CARREON BOULEVARD CLINTON STREET WHITEWATER RIVER WHITEWATER RIVER CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY OF INDIO CITY OF COACHELLA CITY OF INDIAN WELLS CITY OF PALM DESERT CABAZON RESERVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 86 10 10 HIGHWAY 111 14 10 13 12 11 7 9 8 FREDERICK STREET GUITRON ST AVENUE 50

AVE DE ORO WEBB N W E S AS SHOWN
100% SUBMITTAL 6 269 GI 0005 PROJECT MAP ARTS & MUSIC LINE GENERAL SHEETS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: 12345 AVENUE 48 (LA QUINTA) AVENUE 48 (INDIO) LA QUINTA EVACUATION CHANNEL HJORTH STREET & AVENUE 49 VAN BUREN STREET 678910 DILLON ROAD MOON RIVER DRIVE GUITRON STREET AVENIDA DE ORO AVENUE 46 11121314 MADISON STREET MONROE STREET JACKSON STREET DR CARREON BOULEVARD Page 392 Item 13.

1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD PLANS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR THE NECESSARY PERMITS AND TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCE FOR ALL CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS DURING THE LIFE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND/OR PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF LA QUINTA OR OTHER GOVERNING AGENCIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO ANY GRADING, BRUSHING, OR CLEARING AND EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION AT (760) 777-7048. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, OR RELOCATION OF ALL REGULATORY, WARNING AND GUIDE SIGNS. 7. THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ALL STREET NAME SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, TRAFFIC STRIPING, LEGENDS, AND PAVEMENT MARKERS TYPE AND LOCATION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS OR BENCH MARKS NOTED ON THE PLANS, OR FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER WITH AN R.C.E. NUMBER BELOW 33,966, OR A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR ONLY. 9. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT WITHIN ONE HALF MILE OF HUMAN OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY DURING THE TIME PERIODS AS FOLLOWS: OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL 30TH: MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY 7:00AM TO 5:30PM MAY 1ST TO SEPTEMBER 30TH: MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY 6:00AM TO 7:00PM WORK SHALL BE PROHIBITED ANY TIME ON SUNDAYS OR ON FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. NO REDUCTION OF THE TRAVELED WAY WIDTH SHALL BE PERMITTED ON ANY CITY STREET ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS, ORE WHEN ACTIVE WORK IS NOT BEING DONE, UNLESS PRIOR AUTHORIZATION TO DO SO IS GRANTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. NO LANE CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED OR ALLOWED ON ANY CITY STREET BEFORE 8:30AM AND AFTER 3:30PM UNLESS AUTHORIZATION TO DO SO IS GRANTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 10. ALL TRAVELED WAYS MUST BE CLEANED DAILY OF ALL DIRT, MUD AND DEBRIS DEPOSITED ON THEM AS A RESULT OF THE GRADING OPERATION. CLEANING IS TO BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 11. ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL BE PROPERLY POSTED AND LIGHTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE MANUAL OF WARNING SIGNS, LIGHTS, AND DEVICES FOR USE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK UPON HIGHWAYS IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE ANY HAZARDS. 12. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DISTURBING MORE THAN 1-ACRE MUST OBTAIN A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. OWNERS/DEVELOPERS ARE REQUITED TO: A) FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) WITH THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SWRCB); B) PREPARE A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP); AND C) HAVE A MONITORING PLAN FOR THE SITE. THE NPDES IS A NATIONAL PROGRAM TO CONTROL NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTANTS CARRIED BY STORM WATER. THE PROGRAM IS IMPLEMENTED AND ENFORCED BY THE SWRCB. CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL NOTES: AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 7 269 CG 0001 GENERAL NOTES ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS CITY OF LA QUINTA CVAG_PROJ_# CVAG_DWG_# MCDRS NAA XX C65078 MC DRS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: Page 393 Item 13.

1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF INDIO; UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE APPROVED PROJECT PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR (OR DEVELOPER/OWNER FOR A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT) TO OBTAIN FROM THE CITY OF INDIO, AND OTHER GOVERNING AGENCIES, ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR (OR DEVELOPER/OWNER FOR A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF INDIO'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (760.391.4019) AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING ANY NEW PHASE OF WORK.ANY IMPROVEMENT(S) INSTALLED WITHOUT INSPECTION(S) BY THE CITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY LAW. 6. CONTACT PHONE NUMBERS FOR SOME OF THE LOCAL UTILITIES IN INDIO ARE: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ELECTRIC 760-339-9232 THE GAS COMPANY GAS 909-335-7507 VERIZON TELEPHONE 760-864-1726 VALLEY SANITARY DISTRICT SEWER 760-238-5400 TIME WARNER CABLE CABLE 760-346-3714 INDIO WATER AUTHORITY WATER 760-391-4140 CITY OF INDIO ENGINEERING 760-391-4017 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER 760-398-2651 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, PROTECTION, AND/OR RELOCATION OF ALL REGULATORY, WARNING, AND GUIDE SIGNS; AND FOR THE REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, AND PROTECTION OF ANY PAVEMENT STRIPING, AND /OR PAVEMENT LEGENDS/MARKINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW STRIPING AND PAVEMENT LEGENDS/MARKINGS, AND SIGNING (INCLUDING STREET NAME SIGNS FOR ALL NEW STREETS OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED OR DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER). 8. NO WALKWAY, TRAVEL LANE OR STREET CLOSURES ARE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND/OR CITY COUNCIL. WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PER THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD). 9. ALL TRAVELED WAYS MUST BE CLEANED DAILY OF ALL DIRT, MUD, AND DEBRIS DEPOSITED ON THEM AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK.CLEANING TO BE DONE PER THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 10. IN GENERAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS OR BENCH MARKS NOTED ON THE PLANS OR FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF THIS OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO CITY/ COUNTY STANDARDS BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR (OR A LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER WITH NUMBER BELOW 33,966). 11. THE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER (R.C.E.) SIGNING THESE DESIGN PLANS, AND ANY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (INCLUDING GRADING) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ANY ALTERATIONS OR VARIANCES NEEDED FROM THE APPROVED PLANS (EXCEPT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD NEEDED TO MEET EXISTING CONDITIONS), SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE R.C.E. TO DETERMINE AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION, TO REVISE THE PLANS, AND TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY ENGINEER. 12. FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, THE DEVELOPER/OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS OF HIS CONTRACTORS. 13. "AS-BUILT," OR "RECORD" PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ANY RELEASE OF SECURITIES AND/OR ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF USE. 14. AT NO TIME SHALL PRIVATE PROPERTY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT UNLESS PROPERTY-OWNER APPROVAL IS OBTAINED IN WRITING AND GIVEN TO THE CITY. 15. FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS INVOLVING EARTHWORK, A FINAL SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER. THIS FINAL SOILS REPORT SHALL SHOW, AT A MINIMUM, THE LOCATION AND RESULTS FOR ALL SOIL TESTS, AND SHALL CONTAIN AN APPROVAL STATEMENT FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER STATING THAT THE SOIL IS SUITABLE FOR ITS INTENDED USE. THIS FINAL SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD. 16. ALL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (INCLUDING GRADING) ARE APPROVED FOR A PERIOD OF EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE DATE SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. AFTER AN 18 MONTH LAPSE OF SIGNIFICANT WORK, THE “ENGINEER OF RECORD ” SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND PROCESS FOR CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL, UPDATED PLANS THAT COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT CITY STANDARDS, PRACTICES, AND POLICIES. 17. CITY INSPECTION OF THE WORK CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR OBLIGATION TO PERFORM THE WORK IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. NO TRENCHES SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF INDIO GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CITY OF INDIO'S STANDARD GENERAL NOTES" SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE CITY OF INDIO'S STANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENT NOTES." 2. ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, INCLUDING SERVICE LATERALS, SHALL BE IN PLACE WITH TRENCHES COMPACTED AND TESTED PRIOR TO BASE GRADE INSPECTION AND PAVING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT WRITTEN EVIDENCE TO THE CITY ISSUED BY THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY PURVEYOR INDICATING THE SUBSURFACE PORTION OF THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AND ACCEPTED. 3. THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR ITEMS CONSTRUCTED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: A. TRENCH BACKFILL = 90% B. DIRT FILL = 90% C. TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE UNDER IMPROVEMENTS NOT EXPECTED TO RECEIVE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC (INCLUDES SIDEWALK) = 90% D. AGGREGATE BASE (NON-VEHICULAR AREAS) = 90% E. TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE OF ALL AREAS THAT MAY RECEIVE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC (INCLUDES ROADWAY, DRIVE APPROACH, CURB AND GUTTER, AND CROSS GUTTER) = 95% F. AGGREGATE BASE (VEHICULAR AREAS) = 95% G. ASPHALT CONCRETE = 95% 4. ALL AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 26. FOR CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (CL 2 AB). 5. ALL ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC) SHALL CONFORM TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTIONS 39 AND 92. THE AGGREGATE GRADING SHALL CONFORM AS FOLLOWS: A. SURFACE COURSE (UPPER COURSE): TYPE A: 1/2-INCH MAXIMUM, MEDIUM. B. BASE COURSE (LOWER COURSE): TYPE A: 3/4-INCH MAXIMUM, MEDIUM. PLEASE NOTE WHERE THERE IS ONLY ONE LIFT OF AC, THE AGGREGATE GRADING SHALL BE TYPE A: ½-INCH MAXIMUM, MEDIUM. PERFORMANCE GRADED ASPHALT BINDER CONFORMING TO PG 70-10 SHALL BE USED FOR BOTH AGGREGATE GRADING ABOVE. AC MIX DESIGNS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE CITY ENGINEER'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL AT LEAST 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PLANNED PAVING DATE. 6. THE MAXIMUM AC LIFT THICKNESS SHALL BE 3.0 INCHES; HOWEVER, AC THICKNESS OF 5.5" TO 7.5" SHALL BE PLACED IN A MINIMUM OF 3 LIFTS. PROPOSED SURFACE COURSES OTHER THAN 1.5 INCHES (OR .10') THICK SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE ANY BASE LIFT ARE PLACED. 7. A TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, CONCRETE SURFACES, AND THE A.C, BASE COURSE(S) PRIOR TO PLACING A NEW LIFT OF ASPHALT CONCRETE. IF MULTIPLE AC LIFTS ARE PLACED ON THE SAME DAY AND THE SURFACE REMAINS "CLEAN", TACK COAT ON THE EXISTING FRESH AC SURFACE CAN BE WAIVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THE TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.10 GAL/ SQ YD. 8. NEW IMPROVEMENTS THAT JOIN EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL JOIN, OR MATCH, IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ENGINEER. CONSTRUCTIONS OPERATIONS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE A SAFE, DURABLE, AESTHETICALLY PLEASING TRANSITION BETWEEN THE NEW AND EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS MAY INCLUDE CUTTING, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, CAPPING, AND/OR COLD PLANING, AS NEEDED. 9. ALL MANHOLES AND VALVE BOX FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADE AFTER PAVEMENT INSTALLATION IS COMPLETED. 10. ALL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING EARTHWORK GRADING, SHALL BE COMPLETED AND/OR REPAIRED AS NEEDED) PRIOR TO PLACING THE SURFACE AC COURSE. CITY OF INDIO GENERAL STREET IMPROVEMENT NOTES: AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 8 269 CG 0002 GENERAL NOTES ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS CITY OF INDIO CVAG_PROJ_# CVAG_DWG_# MCDRS NAA XX C65078 MC DRS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: Page 394 Item 13.

CITY OF COACHELLA GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DESIGN, MATERIALS, AND CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF COACHELLA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND PROCEDURES AND THE CITY OF COACHELLA STANDARD DRAWINGS AND TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (GREENBOOK), MOST CURRENT EDITIONS AND THESE APPROVED PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AT NO EXPENSE TO THE CITY, PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY SAMPLES AND TESTS REQUIRED BY THE CITY TO ASSURE THAT THE QUALITY OF THE MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SAID SPECIFICATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND SHALL MAINTAIN ALL FACILITIES COMPLETE AND UNCOMPLETED UNTIL ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. 4. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF LAW AS IT AFFECTS EACH UTIILTY INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES AND APPURTENANCES AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND REVIEW ALL NECESSARY STANDARDS, PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS IN DETAIL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING APPROVED PLANS AND REFERENCED STANDARDS SHALL BE ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES. CONFLICTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO WORK IN THAT AREA. 6. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO BE EXISTING FROM RECENT SURVEY OF THE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE A CITY OF COACHELLA PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF COACHELLA (760) 398-5744, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE SET UP WITH THE CITY OF COACHELLA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND ALL AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PRESENT. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL U.S.A., UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, AT 1-800-227-2600 AND SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE COMMENCMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 9. OSHA SAFETY ORDERS AND OSHA CONFINED SPACE ENTRY REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TIMES WITHOUT EXCEPTION. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY CITY OF COACHELLA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF COACHELLA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 11. QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR ESTIMATE PURPOSES ONLY. NEITHER THE DESIGN ENGINEER NOR THE CITY OF COACHELLA GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO LABOR CODE SECTION 6705 BY SUBMITTING A DETAIL PLAN TO THE CITY ENGINEER SHOWING THE DESIGN OF SHORING, BRACING, SLOPING, OR OTHER PROVISIONS TO BE MADE FOR PROTECTION OF WORKERS FROM THE HAZARD OF CAVING GROUND DURING TRENCH EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION THEREIN. THIS PLAN MUST BE PREPARED FOR ALL TRENCHES FIVE FEET OR MORE IN DEPTH. IF THE PLAN VARIES FROM THE SHORING SYSTEM STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS, TITLE 8, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. A COPY OF THE OSHA EXCAVATION PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF COACHELLA INSPECTOR PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 13. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WAS OBTAINED BY AVAILABLE RECORDS SEARCH BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER. TO THE BEST OF THE DEISGN ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE POSSIBLE EXISTENCE OF OTHER UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN, OR IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND OTHER EXISTING FACILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN. 14. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY THE CITY OF COACHELLA DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A REPRESENTATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE LOCATION OF, OR THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF, ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, PIPE, OR STRUCTURE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS PROJECT. 15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRENCH SAFETY AND CONFINED SPACE ENTRY. 16. SOILS REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF COACHELLA BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER WHICH CERTIFIES THAT TRENCH BACKFILL WAS COMPACTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ON SITE EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CITY OF COACHELLA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 17. ALL REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER IN WRITING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 18. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING COMPLETE RECORD OF CHANGES AND SHALL MAKE SUCH RECORD AVAILABLE TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE CITY OF COACHELLA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL SURVEY MONUMENTATION. IF ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS ARE DISTURBED OR DESTROYED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN A LICENSED SURVEYOR TO RE-ESTABLISH AND RECORD THE MONUMENT CHANGE PER STATE LAW. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INTERRUPT OR DISTURB ANY UTILITY FACILITY WITHOUT AUTHORITY FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. WHERE PROTECTION IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF UTILITY FACILITIES (INCLUDING CITY-OWNED UTILITIES). CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND PLACE ALL NECESSARY PROTECTION. AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 9 269 CG 0003 GENERAL NOTES ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS CITY OF COACHELLA CVAG_PROJ_# CVAG_DWG_# MCDRS NAA XX C65078 MC DRS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: Page 395 Item 13.

1. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/OWNER OR CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, PERMIT SECTION, FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED FOR PUBLIC USE; AND TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCE FOR ALL CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS DURING THE LIFE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND/OR PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 2. THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEARING OF THE WORK AREA, AND RELOCATION COSTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS INCLUDES UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE AS REQUIRED BY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. PERMITEE MUST INFORM COUNTY OF CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. PHONE: (951) 955-6790 FOR PERMIT CASES (CUP, PUP, PP OR VOLUNTARY MS CASES.), CABAZON AND AREA WEST. PHONE: (951) 955-6885 FOR PARCEL AND TRACT MAPS. PHONE: (760) 342-8267 FOR PERMIT CASES EAST OF CABAZON. 3. THE DEVELOPER WILL INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS CONFORMING TO COUNTY STANDARD NO. 1220 AND 1221. 4. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION, COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 461 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. 5. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER TO INSTALL STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 461. IF CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE DIFFERS, PROVIDE A TIE TO EXISTING CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. PRIOR TO ROAD CONSTRUCTION, SURVEY MONUMENTS INCLUDING CENTERLINE MONUMENTS, TIE POINTS, PROPERTY CORNERS AND BENCH MARKS SHALL BE REFERENCED OUT AND CORNER RECORDS FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 8771 OF THE BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL CODE. SURVEY POINTS DESTROYED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESET, AND A SECOND CORNER RECORD FILED FOR THOSE POINTS PRIOR TO COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 6. ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, WITH LATERALS, SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO PAVING THE STREET, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: SEWER, WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, STORM DRAINS. 7. CURB DEPRESSIONS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES WILL BE INSTALLED AND CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO COUNTY STANDARD NO. 206 AND/OR NO. 207, AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD. 8. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION, REGULATORY, GUIDE AND WARNING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS AND ITS SURROUNDINGS TO PROVIDE SAFE PASSAGE FOR THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND WORKERS UNTIL THE FINAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE COUNTY. 9. A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPROVED STREET PLAN FOR REVIEW TO THE PERMITS SECTION OR INSPECTION SECTION (FOR MAP CASES) PRIOR TO OBTAINING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. 10. ALL STREET SECTIONS ARE TENTATIVE. ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTS FOR PARCEL AND TRACT MAPS SHALL BE TAKEN AND MAY BE TAKEN FOR PERMIT CASES BY THE COUNTY AFTER ROUGH GRADING TO DETERMINE THE EXACT STREET SECTION REQUIREMENTS. USE STANDARD NO. 401 IF EXPANSIVE SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED. 11. ASPHALTIC EMULSION (FOG SEAL) SHALL BE APPLIED NOT LESS THAN 14 DAYS FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF THE ASPHALT SURFACING. FOG SEAL AND PAINT BINDER SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.05 AND 0.03 GALLON PER SQUARE YARD RESPECTIVELY. ASPHALTIC EMULSION SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 37, 39 AND 94 OF THE STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 12. PRIME COAT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PAVING ON ALL GRADES IN EXCESS OF TEN PERCENT. 13. INSTALL STREET TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 461 AND THE COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (CHOOSE THREE SPECIES AND NAME THEM HERE). 14. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED STREET LIGHTING PLAN. 15. AS DETERMINED BY THE TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR, THE DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE AS A MINIMUM FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO CENTERLINE, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO RECONSTRUCT EXISTING PAVEMENT, INCLUDING BASE, AND MATCHING OVERLAY REQUIRED TO MEET THE STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE CURRENT ASSIGNED TRAFFIC INDEX. 16. ONLY LANDSCAPING CONSISTING OF GRASS AND PARKWAY TREES MAY BE INSTALLED WITHIN PARKWAYS ON LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS WITHOUT SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS. ALL OTHER TYPES OF LANDSCAPING IN THESE AREAS, AND ALL LANDSCAPING ON ALL OTHER STREETS, SHALL REQUIRE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS. ALL LANDSCAPING ENCROACHMENTS SHALL CONFORM TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES DATED OCTOBER 2009. 17. ANY PRIVATE DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS NOT PART OF THIS PROJECT ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. BY SIGNING THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, NO REVIEW OR APPROVAL OF THOSE PRIVATE FACILITIES IS IMPLIED OR INTENDED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. A. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS MUST OBTAIN A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. OWNERS/DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) WITH THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SWRCB), PREPARE A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND MONITORING PLAN FOR THE SITE. B. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE COUNTY A COPY OF THE NOI WITH A VALID WDID NUMBER. 18. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL SIGNS AND MARKINGS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN WITHIN THE PROJECT AREAS, OR ON ROADWAYS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES, UPON THE REQUEST OF THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION OR HIS DESIGNEE TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC SAFETY ON THE ROADS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE DEVELOPER. 19. EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES / CULVERTS (WHETHER TO BE CONNECTED TO, EXTENDED, ADJUSTED, DRAINED TO, OR JUST IN THE PROJECT VICINITY) MUST BE REPAIRED, AND /OR CLEANED TO MAKE THEM FUNCTIONAL AND ACCEPTABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. 20. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL (RCFC) FOR PERMITS WHEN ANY STORM DRAIN PIPE NEEDS TO BE CONNECTED WITH A RCFC FACILITY AND ADD PERMIT # ___________ ON THE PLAN. 21. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER OR CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE CITY AND OR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THEIR RIGHT-OF-WAY. 22. FOR ALL DRIVEWAY RECONSTRUCTION BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY, PROOF OF DRIVEWAY OWNER NOTIFICATION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GENERAL NOTES: AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 10 269 CG 0004 GENERAL NOTES ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CVAG_PROJ_# CVAG_DWG_# MCDRS NAA XX C65078 MC DRS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: Page 396 Item 13.

AS SHOWN
100% SUBMITTAL 11 269 CG 0401 DETAIL SHEET ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE FULL DEPTH BIKE BARRIER 4" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE & 6" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE N.T.S. CLASS IV BIKE FACILITY (CYCLE TRACK) VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CLASS IV BIKE FACILITY (CYCLE TRACK) VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SURFACE MOUNT BIKE BARRIER 4" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE & 6" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE N.T.S. CLASS IV BIKE FACILITY (CYCLE TRACK) VEHICULAR TRAFFIC MOUNTABLE BIKE BARRIER 2" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE & 4" CURB, 4V:1H SLOPE N.T.S. SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW SECTION VIEW BIKE BARRIER TRANSITION - ISOMETRIC VIEW OVERLAY JOIN DETAIL N.T.S. MODIFIED TYPE 842B BARRIER N.T.S. NOTES: 1. FOR DETAILS NOT SHOWN, SEE CALTRANS REVISED STANDARD PLANS B11-81, B11-82, B11-82A. 2. SCUPPER CANNOT BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 15 FEET FROM EXPANSION JOINT. SPACING BETWEEN TWO ADJACENT SCUPPERS IS 30 FEET MAXIMUM AND 20 FEET MINIMUM. 6" 2%±
6" 4" 3' 1" 2'-9 1/2" 1 1/2" R=3/4" R=3/4" 2%± 0.50 TC 0.00 FL 6" 2%±
4" 3' 1" 2'-9 1/2" 1 1/2" R=3/4" R=3/4" 2%± 0.50 TC 0.00 FL 3/4" x 8" DOWEL 6" 9" 9"
6" 10' 1'
9" 9" JOINT JOINT 1' DOWELS (TYP)
4" 2%±
6" 2" 3' 1/2" 2'-10 1/2" 1" R=3/4" R=3/4" 2%± 0.33 TC 0.00 FL EXPANSION JOINT MOUNTABLE BIKE BARRIER FULL DEPTH BIKE BARRIER EXPANSION JOINT 10' EXPANSION JOINT MOUNTABLE BIKE BARRIER SURFACE MOUNT BIKE BARRIER EXPANSION JOINT 10' 1' 6"
3/4" EXISTING ROADWAY SURFACE PROPOSED SIDEWALK CL-2 AGGREGATE BASE 6" #5 TOT 2 #5 @ 6 TUBULAR BICYCLE RAILING PER DRAWING S-3 (SHEET 153) SCUPPER PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN B7-8, TYP SEE NOTE 2 SAWCUT Page 397 Item 13.

INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS SHOWN 100% SUBMITTAL 12 269 CG 0402 DETAIL SHEET ARTS & MUSIC LINE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS CABLE RAIL FENCE N.T.S. ELEVATION SECTION 1' CONCRETE FOOTING FINISH GRADE 2" SQ. STAINLESS STEEL POST - 14 GA. MIN. 3/16" DIA. STAINLESS STEEL CABLE 2" X 3/4" STAINLESS STEEL TOP RAIL STAINLESS STEEL CABLE TENSIONER AS REQUIRED 2'
3"
6'
4" TYP.

Item 13.

DILLON ROAD AVENUE 48 WEBB NW E S GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD WEBB W N S E MATCHLINE - STA. 18+00.00 SEE ABOVE RIGHT MATCHLINE - STA. 27+00.00 SEE SHEET CV 8202 MATCHLINE - STA. 18+00.00 SEE BELOW LEFT FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW ONLY 43 269 CV 6201 FROM STA. 9+00.00 TO STA. 27+00.00 ARTS & MUSIC LINE ALIGNMENT CONTROL DILLON ROAD XXXX CXXXXX INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U DILESH SHETH DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING DILLON ROAD C/L N15°04'46"W 180.71' S36°10'28"E 251.96' C18 C19 9+00.00 BP 10+80.71 BC 14+79.94 BC
12+27.98 EC C2 C22 C15 L1 C2 L2 C25 L3 C26C50 L7 L9 C51 C52 C54 L13 C55 C57 L16 L17 C59 C61 C2 C2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EXISTING R/W EXISTING DILLON ROAD C/L N43°11'30"E 536.06' C19 21+82.50 EC C56 C57 C63 C65 L22 C61 DILLON ROAD CURVE TABLE CURVE # C18 C19 LENGTH 147.27 702.56 RADIUS 400.00 400.00 DELTA 21°05'42" 100°38'02" TANGENT 74.48 482.09 CURVE TABLE CURVE # C2 C15 C22 C25 C26 C50 C51 C52 C54 C55 C59 C61 LENGTH 4.71 69.26 8.86 78.72 130.68 131.71 26.65 11.08 11.45 25.92 183.52 184.97 RADIUS 1.50 360.00 41.00 363.00 379.00 381.99 109.00 91.00 94.00 106.00 379.00 381.99 DELTA 180°00'00" 11°01'21" 12°22'31" 12°25'28" 19°45'18" 19°45'20" 14°00'37" 6°58'44" 6°58'44" 14°00'37" 27°44'36" 27°44'40" TANGENT INFINITY 34.74 4.45 39.51 65.99 66.52 13.39 5.55 5.73 13.02 93.59 94.34 Page 399 Item 13.

MATCHLINE - STA. 17+00.00 SEE BELOW LEFT

DILLON ROAD
AVENUE 48
WEBB
N
W
E
S MATCHLINE - STA. 26+00.00 SEE SHEET CD 6202

GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD

GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD
MATCHLINE - STA. 17+00.00 SEE ABOVE RIGHT
WEBB
W N
S E 100% SUBMITTAL
AS SHOWN 67 269
CD 6201
FROM STA. 9+00.00 TO STA. 27+00.00

ARTS & MUSIC LINE

DEMOLITION PLANS

DILLON ROAD
CVAG_PROJ_#
CVAG_DWG_#
JWB
JWB
JWB
09/02/2020
C65078

JWB DRS
INFO
PROJECT NO:

CAD DWG FILE:

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

REVIEWED BY:

DATE:

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO.

DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE

SHEET OF
DRAWING NO. ISSUE Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly.

ENGINEER OF

RECORD'S SEAL

DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133

AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS

BEFORE YOU DIG

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
O
L
AC

O EB F RE Y
D
GI U

DILESH SHETH DATE

PLANS PREPARED UNDER
THE SUPERVISION OF:

R.C.E. NO.:

DESIGNED
BY:

CHECKED
BY:
1 2
4 5
8 69
70 73
78 SEE SHEET CD 2212
s
V
V
FH
V
V
V
V
V
s
V
V
V
V
s
V
s
s
V
FH
V
V
V
FH
V
V
s
s
V
s
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
s
FH
s
s
X
X
X

X X X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X

X X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
1 4
4 (6')
8 2

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING DILLON ROAD C/L
(88')
(6')
(8')
(50') (28')
(88')
(100')
(24')
(30')
(5')
(24')
(30')
(67')
(50') (28')
(88')
(101') SEE AVENUE 48 STREET

IMPROVEMENT PLANS

FOR DEMOLITION
316
317
318
319

BEGIN C&G REMOVAL
(5')
(6')
(17')
(35')
5 (5')
(17')
2 8
78 79 CITY OF COACHELLA CITY OF INDIO

EXISTING C& G
EXISTING SIDEWALK 83
83 EXISTING LIGHT POLE

EXISTING CB
83 83
EXISTING DILLON ROAD 83
EXISTING C& G 83
2 V
V
s
V
s
s
s
V
V
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X X
X
X
s
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
17 18
19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26
1 4
(6')

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING DILLON ROAD C/L
(88')
(100')
(24')
(30')
(101')
(5')
(17')
2 4
1 5
8 8
2 8
(17')
(26.5'±)
1 8
2 (17')
8 78
88 REFER TO SEPARATE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR

BIKE PATH CONSTRUCTION OVER THE BRIDGE
5 EXISTING R/W

EXISTING RAILROAD R/W

Item 13.

EG ELEV FG ELEV SCALE: 1" = 40' HORZ. 1" = 4' VERT.

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00MATCHLINE - STA. 27+00.00 SEE SHEET 113

DILLON ROAD

GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD

GRAPEFRUIT BOULEVARD
MATCHLINE - STA. 18+00.00 SEE SHEET 111 MATCHLINE - STA. 18+00.00 SEE SHEET 111 MATCHLINE - STA. 28+00.00 SEE SHEET 113 WEBB
W N
S E 100% SUBMITTAL
AS SHOWN 112 269
CI 6302
FROM STA. 18+00.00 TO STA. 27+00.00

ARTS & MUSIC LINE

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS

DILLON ROAD
CVAG_PROJ_#
CVAG_DWG_#
JWB
DRS
JWB
09/02/2020
C65078

JWB DRS
INFO
PROJECT NO:

CAD DWG FILE:

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWN BY:

REVIEWED BY:

DATE:

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO.

DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE

SHEET OF
DRAWING NO. ISSUE Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly.

ENGINEER OF

RECORD'S SEAL

DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133

AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS

BEFORE YOU DIG

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
O
L
AC

O EB F RE Y
D
GI U

DILESH SHETH DATE

PLANS PREPARED UNDER
THE SUPERVISION OF:

R.C.E. NO.:

DESIGNED
BY:

CHECKED
BY:
480
C/L
480
LT
490
C/L
490
LT
480
C/L
480
LT
490
C/L
490
LT
25 27
29 30
31 34
35 40
84 s
V
s
V
s
s
s
V
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X

X X X X X X X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X
s
s
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING RAILROAD R/W

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING DILLON ROAD C/L
(30')
18 19
20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27
6'
18'
3'10'
(19')
(2')
(5')

REFER TO SEPARATE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR

BIKE PATH CONSTRUCTION OVER THE BRIDGE
25 31
25 27
27 29
29 34
27 40
25 27
25 84
84 30
35 84
27 EXISTING R/W 18+00.00 479.61 FS GB: 19+00.00 483.00 FS GB: 20+20.00 487.06 FS GB: 20+00.00 486.46 FS

3.02%

3.46% 26+00.00 GB 482.20 FS 18+00.00 GB 479.05 FS 20+00.00 GB 485.92 FS 18+00.00 19+00.00 482.48 FS 20+00.00 485.92 FS 21+00.00 489.60 FS22+00.00 492.11 FS 23+00.00 492.62 FS 24+00.00 491.14 FS 25+00.00 487.66 FS 27+00.00 476.06 FS

3.44% -6.30%

3.69%
-6.13% 20+91.15 BVC 489.28 FS 25+91.15 BVC 482.75 FS
VC=500.00
PVI=498.49
502.68 FS

3.40%

3.39% 21+00.00 (489.9±) FS22+00.00 (492.4±) FS 23+00.00 (492.9±) FS 24+00.00 (491.4±) FS 25+00.00 (487.9±) FS 26+00.00 (482.5±) FS 27+00.00 (476.6±) FS PR. FS @ BIKE
BARRIER @ 19' LT
PR. FS @ C/L
EX. GROUND @

DILLON RD C/L
EX. GROUND @

DILLON RD C/L
PR. FS @ BIKE
BARRIER @ 19' LT

Item 13.
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 24 L=75'
W1-2a(L) (30) 50
1 1
L=35' 38
27B L=95'
12 L=980'
22 L=740'
L=160' 22
38 L=60'
38 L=60'
L=65' 38
12 L=870'

DILLON RD
13' 11' 11' 13'
12'
10'
11'
12'
11'
11'
12'
10'
51 W6-2
OM1-1
50 W6-1
OM1-1
51 W3-3
51 W6-2
OM1-1
51 W6-1
OM1-1
R/W
54 R/W R10-15R(MOD)
10 L=30'
28'
11'
10'
8'
13'
3'
2'
1 L=100'
51 L=90'
1 19 W=12'
24 L=25'
54 R4-7C
OM2-1H
12 54 R10-15L(MOD)
1 1
1 1
1 24 L=95'
2 8
5 8
2 54 R9-6
54 W1-7
OM1-3
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29
30 31
L=595' 12
12 L=625'
1 L=640'
L=420' 22
L=75' 38
L=90' 50
L=75' 38
R3-7 50
W3-3 50
R2-1(30) 50
1 1
4 1 L=130'
R/W

DILLON RD CABAZON RD
10' 13' 11' 12' 12' 11'
51 W1-2a(R)(30)
1 1
L=40'
L=50' 50
L=30' 1
3 L=5'
20 20
20 20
50 W9-2(L)
50 W20 (CA) 13' 12' 10' 11' 11' 12'
(13')
(12')
(12')
(12')
(14')
TS
L=5'
15 51 L=85'
15 15
15 L=85' 51

GRAPEFRUIT BLVD RAILROAD
L=110' 22
L=300' 29
1 L=15' 1
19 W=12'
19 W=12'
20 R9-6 54
R9-6 54
1 1 1
8 2
R10-22 54
54 R10-22
54 R10-22
R/W
TCE
1 1
38 L=100'
22 L=100'
L=31'
15'
12' 13'
INFO
PROJECT NO:

CAD DWG FILE:

DESIGNED BY: A.C
DRAWN BY: T.T
REVIEWED BY: T.T
DATE: 08/2024
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO.

DATE
APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE

SHEET OF
DRAWING NO. ISSUE Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly.

ENGINEER OF

RECORD'S SEAL

DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133

AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS

BEFORE YOU DIG

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
O
L
AC

O EB F RE Y
D
GI U

ADAM CHASE DATE

PLANS PREPARED UNDER
THE SUPERVISION OF:

R.C.E. NO.: 74043

DESIGNED
BY:

CHECKED
BY:

R
D RE
TE I G
S RE
P
L
NE
G

NE I RE O I ON
FE S A
S
C
O
T TA S
E
I A N
I
F
L
LI FO
V I
CA R
A
D A M S . C H A S
E
C74043 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF

ARTS & MUSIC LINE
269100% SUBMITTAL
A.C. T.T.

NOV. 2024
0' 40' 80'
SCALE 1" = 40'
N
MATCHLINE STA 11+50 SEE SHEET 174
MATCHLINE STA 21+00 BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 21+00 SEE ABOVE RIGHT MATCHLINE STA 30+50 SEE SHEET 179
N

SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES
1 FURNISH AND INSTALL TWO-COAT PAINT PAVEMENT MARKING
PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN. SEE LEGEND ON SHEET 157.
2 FURNISH AND INSTALL "YIELD" PAVEMENT MARKING PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
3 FURNISH AND INSTALL BIKE LANE WITH ARROW PAVEMENT
MARKING PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
4 FURNISH AND INSTALL 2'X10' WHITE TWO-COAT PAINT
CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK AT 5' INTERVALS CENTER TO
CENTER PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
5 FURNISH AND INSTALL 1'X10' WHITE TWO-COAT PAINT
CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK AT 2' INTERVALS CENTER TO
CENTER PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.

FURNISH AND INSTALL 12" WHITE TWO-COAT PAINT LIMIT LINE. 8 FURNISH AND INSTALL WHITE BICYCLE YIELDING MARKING PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
13 FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE D BLUE RETROREFLECTIVE
PAVEMENT MARKER 6" FROM LEFT EDGE LINE.
15 FURNISH AND INSTALL BICYCLE DETECTOR PAVEMENT MARKING PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
19 FURNISH AND INSTALL GREEN BIKE CONFLICT MARKING PER
DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
50 EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
20 FURNISH AND INSTALL WHITE CURB PAINT WITH WHITE
REFLECTIVE MARKERS BETWEEN CROSSWALKS SPACED 3' O.C.
51 EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED.
53 EXISTING SIGN TO BE RELOCATED PER PLAN.
54 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW SIGN AND BREAK AWAY POST PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.

STRIPING DETAILS
INSTALL YELLOW BROKEN LINE (DETAIL 52) PER DETAIL ON
SHEET 158.

INSTALL WHITE LANE LINE (DETAIL 12) PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20A.

INSTALL MODIFIED 4" YELLOW LEFT EDGE LINE (DETAIL 24) PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20B.

INSTALL WHITE RIGHT EDGE LINE (DETAIL 27B) PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20B.

INSTALL YELLOW MEDIAN ISLAND LINE (DETAIL 29) PER
CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20B.

INSTALL WHITE CHANNELIZING LINE (DETAIL 38) PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20D.

INSTALL WHITE INTERSECTION BIKE LANE LINE (DETAIL 39A) PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A20D.

INSTALL WHITE LINE (DETAIL 50) PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.

INSTALL YELLOW INTERSECTION BIKE LANE LINE (DETAIL 51)
PER DETAIL ON SHEET 158.
1 12
29 38
50 51
24 39A

SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS

DILLON RD & CABAZON RD
178
SS-6201
L=5'
AVENUE 48
R10-22 54
27B

Item 13.
21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U QUYET T. NGUYEN DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: C 71743 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Engineers Inc Exp. 12-31-25 C71743 RO C O G RE ST TE A P D TE I S RE E F CAL I OLF I V I ER I A RN NA FESS I O L NGI N E QUYET RONGNGUYEN DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION ARTS & MUSIC LINE DILLON ROAD ALTERNATIVES 11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265 Riverside CA 92505 Phone: (951) 687-1005 Fax: (951) 667-3387 61'-9"± 1'-0"± 12'-0" 11'-7" 1'-5"± 5'-0"± 11'-7" 12'-0" PLAN 1" = 20' ELEVATION 1" = 20' TYPICAL SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" BC 21+82.49 BC 24+87.02 Elev 488.69 BB 21+91.69± Elev 492.42± DATUM Elev 430.00 BB EB 100'-0" UPRR R/W 50'-0"± 15'-0"± TO YUMA TO LOS ANGELES TO I-10 TO PALM DESERT ACCESS ROAD UPRR ML #2 UPRR ML #1 TOE OF Exist SLOPE TOE OF Exist SLOPE TOE OF Exist SLOPE TOE OF Exist SLOPE BC 14+79.94 12'-0" TOP OF Exist SLOPE TOP OF Exist SLOPE Exist MBGR APPROX OG 147'-8" 147'-8" 5'-0"± 2'-2" S36° 10' 28"E NOTES: Exist Concrete barrier Type 732 Exist Concrete barrier Type 26 Exist Chain link railing Type 7 Exist Structure approach Type N (30S) Exist MBGR Concrete barrier Type 842R Tubular Bicycle Railing Luminare, see "ELECTRICAL - LIGHTING" Plans. 2-2" Conduits, see "ELECTRICAL - LIGHTING" Plans. 123456 1 2 3 1 4 55 4 TOP OF 4 Exist SLOPE TOP OF Exist SLOPE 10°38'4" SKEW ,Typ Exist MSE WALL Typ 295'-4" (MEASURE ALONG DILLON ROAD) R/W CVWD EASEMENT DILLON ROAD 6 2% ± 23+29.36 Abut 1 BENT 2 Abut 3 32'-0"± 29'-9"± 10'-0" 11'-8" 12'-0" 11'-8"
2'-0"
10'-0"
12'-2"
12'-0"
11'-7"
11'-7" Var
24'-7"
Min Clr 35'-3"± N 43°11'30" E
10'-0" S-1 121 191 DILLON ROAD 355'-4" ± MESURED ALONG DILLON ROAD 47'-2" 2'-2" 4'-9" GENERAL PLAN CONCRETE BARRIER DETAILS TUBULAR BICYCLE RAILING DETAILS JOINT ARMOR FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS BRIDGE REHABILITATION DETAILS INDEX TO PLANS SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE GENERAL PLAN LEGEND: Existing Structure Direction of Traffic Indicates Limits of Furnish Bridge Deck Treatment Material and Prepare and Treat Bridge Deck With Methacrylate. Prior to Deck Treatment, Remove Unsound Concrete and Place Rapid Setting Concrete (Patch) as Shown On "JOINT AND DECK REPAIR DETAIL" DETAIL ON "BRIDGE REHABILITATION DETAILS" Sheet. Point of Minimum Vertical Clearance GRAPEFRUIT Blvd 8 8 SIDEWALK WITH Mod Conc BARRIER TYPE 842 (Mod) NOT SHOWN SEE ROADWAY PLANS SIDEWALK WITH Mod Conc BARRIER TYPE 842 (Mod) NOT SHOWN SEE ROADWAY PLANS Exp Jt, Typ Page 403 Item 13.

INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U QUYET T. NGUYEN DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: C 71743 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Engineers Inc Exp. 12-31-25 C71743 RO C O G RE ST TE A P D TE I S RE E F CAL I OLF I V I ER I A RN NA FESS I O L NGI N E QUYET RONGNGUYEN DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION ARTS & MUSIC LINE DILLON ROAD ALTERNATIVES 11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265 Riverside CA 92505 Phone: (951) 687-1005 Fax: (951) 667-3387 5'-0"± 5'-0"± #4 @ 15 1'-0" TYPICAL SECTION AT MSE WALL 3/4" = 1'-0"' MSE WALL PANEL TYPICAL SECTION AT DECK AND APPROACH SLAB 3/4" = 1'-0"' Exist Conc BARRIER TYPE 26 # 5 Conc, Tot 18 #5 @ 12 DRILL AND BOND DOWEL IN 6" HOLE AS 3 1 2" Clr
Typ #5 @ 12 Exist Conc BARRIER TYPE 26 13'-2" 5'-0"± 5'-0"± 2'-2" Conc BARRIER TYPE 842R 1'-0"± 1'-0"± 1'-0" ± S-2 122 191 SAWCUT 3 4" SAWCUT 3 4" 10'-0" CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN NOTES: Load Combinations: Extreme II Q=1.00DC+1.00CT Where: Q: DC: CT: IM: Force Effects Dead Load of Structure Components Vehicular Collision Force Vehicular Dynamic Load Allowance DESIGN: CT: Load Combinations and "Lc" given for barrier attachments to existing bridge deck only. ** Typical Segment at least "Lc" away from End Segment, *** Near Joint Segment within "Lc" from deck joint. Interior Segment Near Joint Segment AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition with California Amendments 54 kip maximum traffic impact distributed over "Lt" = 3.5 feet at the top of the barrier, which results in the following values for "Lc" at the deck slab: NOTES: 1. Avoid existing reinforcement when drilling. 2. For details not shown, see Caltrans Revised Standard Plans RSP B11-81, RSP B11-82 & RSP B11-82A. Dimensions may vary with roadway cross slope and with certain thicknesses of surfacing. See ROADWAY PLANS. 3. Clearance to reinforcing steel shall be 2", except as noted. Longitudinal reinforcement shall stop at all expansion joints. 4. For typical metal railing connection details not shown, see Caltrans Standard Plans A77U1 and A77U2. 5. Roughen existing bridge deck surface before casting new concrete against existing concrete. 6. Scupper cannot be located closer than 15 feet from expansion joint. Spacing between two adjacent scuppers is 30 feet maximum and 20 feet minimum. 7. Lightweight concrete (f'c = 3.25 ksi) shall be used for the sidewalk concrete on bridge deck. 13'-2" 2'-2" 10'-0" 15.7 Feet 6.9 Feet Conc BARRIER TYPE 842(Mod) 12" 6" ** *** #5 @ 16 #5 @ 6 DRILL & BOND DOWEL IN 5" DEEP HOLE #5 Tot 7 EQ SPACED #5 Tot 12 #5 @ 6 DRILL & BOND DOWEL IN 5" DEEP HOLE 112" Min SEE NOTE 1 Exist TOP TRANSVERSE Reinf TUBULAR BICYCLE RAILING TUBULAR BICYCLE RAILING ROUGHENED SURFACE, SEE NOTE 5 EXISTING Conc DECK #5 @ 6 #5 @ 6 #5 @ 12#5 Tot 7 EQ SPACED B11-81 -- B11-81 -- CONCRETE BARRIER DETAILS SCUPPER, Typ SEE NOTE 6 B7-8 -- 5"
4"Exist ROADWAY SURFACE NOTE: Typical Section on bridge deck shown, section on approach slab similar. 3 4" 2" 1'-0" SAW CUT Exist ROADWAY #4 @ 15 LUMINARE AND LIGHTING CONDUITS, SEE "ELECTRICAL - LIGHTING" PLANS, SEE LUMINARE AND LIGHTING CONDUITS, SEE "ELECTRICAL - LIGHTING" PLANS, SEE B11-82 -- RSP B11-82A -- RSP RSP B11-82 -- RSP B11-82A -- RSP RSP Exist MSE WALL SOIL REINFORCEMENT TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE #5 @ 24 DRILL AND BOND DOWEL IN 5" DEEP HOLE#5 @ 18 DOWEL 1'-0" 8 8"± Page 404
Item 13.
2" SLEEVE TACK WELD 3 8" NUT INSIDE OF SLEEVE FOR 3 8" HEX BOLT WITH LOCK WASHER 2" 4" 8" MIN 12" HOLES NEAR AND FAR SIDE SLEEVE FORMED OF 316" BENT THUS , FOR SLIDING FIT INSIDE OF RAIL TUBE NOTE: 3 8" NUT TACK WELDED TO SLEEVE MAY BE REPLACED BY DRILLED AND TAPPED HOLE IN SLEEVE. 6" MATCH DECK Exp Jt 3 8" BOLT 33 4" EDGE OF SLOTTED HOLE SLEEVE ROADWAY FACE ROADWAY FACE SLEEVE 16" 412" SLOTTED HOLE TUBE EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS NO SCALE SLEEVE TUBE SPLICE SECTION VIEW B-B VIEW A-A 8" Min BB A A 316" NOTE: HSS 2 x 2 x 316 SHOWN, HSS 3 x 2 x 316 SIMILAR. RAIL CAP DETAIL NO SCALE G 412" 518" 1 16" 518" 814" 1 16" 518" 814" 814 x 814 12 1316" x 15 8" SLOT 5 8" Ø THREADED ROD 12" LONG WITH NUTS AND 2" Ø PLATE WASHERS, Tot 4 18" x 214" x 8" 15 8" 1316" 1 16" 518" 516 45° 14 R=6" 2" 7"
4" BC EC 516 45° 14 516 45° 14 GG GG SECTION RAIL TUBE ELEVATION 1" 1" HSS 3 x 2 x 316 RAIL TUBE HSS 2 x 2 x 316 POST, VERTICAL 3 8" Ø VENT HSS 2 x 2 x 316 60° G 4'-6" INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U QUYET T. NGUYEN DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: C 71743 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Engineers Inc Exp. 12-31-25 C71743 RO C O G RE ST TE A P D TE I S RE E F CAL I OLF I V I ER I A RN NA FESS I O L NGI N E QUYET RONGNGUYEN DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION ARTS & MUSIC LINE DILLON ROAD ALTERNATIVES 11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265 Riverside CA 92505 Phone: (951) 687-1005 Fax: (951) 667-3387 ELEVATION NO SCALE 3'-3" R = 4'-0" R = 3'-5" 1" BC 5'-0" Min - 6'-6" Max CENTERED ON TYPE 80 POST EXCEPT AS NOTED TOP OF CONCRETE BARRIER TYPE 842R, TYPE 842 (Mod) OR TYPE 842B (Mod) SEE TUBE EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS EXPANSION JOINT, SEE NOTE 3 1'-4" Min 14" HSS 2 x 2 x 316 1'-43 8" 7" 7" 10" HSS 2 x 2 x 516 SEE "DETAIL A" B11-82 -- BOLTS HSS 2 x 2 x 516 SEE RAIL CONNECTION DETAILS SEE BASE PLATE DETAILS SEE SHIM DETAILS TOP OF DECK DETAIL A NO SCALE TYPICAL SECTION NO SCALE BASE PLATE DETAILS NO SCALE SHIM DETAILS NO SCALE Conc BARRIER TYPE 842 (Mod) S-3 123 191 NOTES: 1. Post shall be normal to railing. 2. Rail tubes shall be shop bent or fabricated to fit horizontal curve when radius is less than 950'. 3. Tube splices shall be located in the tubes spanning deck or wall joints. Increase joint width in tubes to match expansion joint width and increase sleeve length correspondingly. 4. Top rail tube shall be continuous over not less than two posts except a short post spacing is permitted near deck or wall joints, electroliers, or other rail discontinuities as noted. 5. For details and reinforcement not shown see Caltrans Revised Standard Plans RSP B11-81, RSP B11-82 & RSP B11-82A. RAIL CONNECTION DETAILS NO SCALE 1" CHAFER TUBULAR BICYCLE RAILING DETAILS 3 4" Min TUBE-WELDED SPLICE NO SCALE MATCH DECK Exp Jt, WALL Exp Jt, OR BARRIER SLAB Exp Jt. RSP B11-81 -- B11-82 -- RSP B11-82A -- RSP RSP 3 4" VENT HOLE @ 45° PLAN - END OF RAILING NO SCALE R = 10'-0" TOP RAIL TOP RAIL MIDDLE RAIL BOTTOM RAIL R = 5'-6" TOP RAIL 1" Min Conc BARRIER TYPE 842B Mod SEE ROADWAY PLAN FOR MGS/CRASH CUSHION CONNECTION TO THE BARRIER NOT SHOWN) Page 405 Item 13.

INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U QUYET T. NGUYEN DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: C 71743 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Engineers Inc Exp. 12-31-25 C71743 RO C O G RE ST TE A P D TE I S RE E F CAL I OLF I V I ER I A RN NA FESS I O L NGI N E QUYET RONGNGUYEN DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION ARTS & MUSIC LINE DILLON ROAD ALTERNATIVES 11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265 Riverside CA 92505 Phone: (951) 687-1005 Fax: (951) 667-3387 S-4 124 191 TOP OF BARRIER Typ Typ 1" 18" GAP 18" Max GAP
Typ 2 1 1 2 ELEVATION 18" 12" R = 116" 18" Max GAP DETAIL A DETAIL B PLAN SKEW 20° AASECTION A-A NO SCALE TAPER CONCRETE TAPER EDGE OF STEEL PLATE OPEN JOINT TO MATCH DECK JOINT WIDTH SEE "DETAIL A" TOP OF SIDEWALK TOP OF DECK DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC BARRIER FACE 1" 10" 8"
3"
3"
1" OPEN JOINT TO MATCH DECK JOINT WIDTH TOP OF BARRIER TOP OF SIDEWALK 12" X 2" FLAT HEAD CAP SCREWS WITH INSERT ASSEMBLIES @ 12 Max, STAGGERED 2"6" CONCRETE BARRIER TYPE 842R 3 8 " x 18" CHECKERED STEEL PLATE JOINT ARMOR FOR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS NOTES: 1. Utility openings and expansion joints not shown for clarity. 2. Recess concrete 12" for plates. 3. For the recess on the existing sidewalk, remove and grind concrete as required. Do not damage concrete to remain in place. Removal and cleaning method must be submitted to the Engineer for approval prior to construction. 4. Plates to be galvanized. 5. Insert assembly or expansion anchorage for 5 8" x 13 4" bolts. Use installation bolts extended 12" minimum past nut and coat with bond breaker. After concrete has cured, remove installation bolts, install HS bolts. TOP OF DECK SEE "DETAIL B" CHECKERED STEEL CONCRETE BARRIER TYPE 26 CONCRETE BARRIER TYPE 842R 12" X 2" FLAT HEAD CAP SCREW MECHANICAL EXPANSION ANCHORS @ 12 Max, STAGGERED Page 406 Item 13.

INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U QUYET T. NGUYEN DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.C.E. NO.: C 71743 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Engineers Inc Exp. 12-31-25 C71743 RO C O G RE ST TE A P D TE I S RE E F CAL I OLF I V I ER I A RN NA FESS I O L NGI N E QUYET RONGNGUYEN DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION ARTS & MUSIC LINE DILLON ROAD ALTERNATIVES 11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265 Riverside CA 92505 Phone: (951) 687-1005 Fax: (951) 667-3387 S-5 125 191 DECK REPAIR TABLE REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE AND RAPID SETTING CONCRETE (PATCH) BRIDGE NAME BRIDGE NUMBER APPROXIMATE AREA DAMAGED (PERCENT) APPROXIMATE DEPTH (INCHES) LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. FOR DETAILS SEE "JOINT AND DECK REPAIR DETAIL". DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION 56C0591 1 3 APPROXIMATE DECK SURFACE AFTER REMOVING UNSOUND CONCRETE AND SURFACE PREPARATION, MINIMUM CONCRETE REMOVAL DEPTH IS 1" FILL WITH RAPID SETTING CONCRETE PATCH MATERIAL. JOINT AND DECK REPAIR DETAIL NO SCALE EXISTING CONCRETE DECK SURFACE EXISTING REINFORCEMENT TO REMAIN NEW JOINT SEAL NOT SHOWN SAW CUT VERTICAL EDGE 3 4" DEPTH, Typ NOTES: 1. Locations to be determined by the engineer. 2. Reinforcement may be encountered during deck concrete removal and is to remain undamaged. LEGEND: Area of unsound concrete removal and rapid setting concrete (patch) material. BRIDGE REHABILITATION DETAILS REPLACE TOP OF BRIDGE DECK For use only where deck joint matches the sidewalk, curb or barrier rail joint. JOINT SEAL AT LOW SIDE OF DECK Note: Details shown for illustration purposes only. BARRIER RAIL JOINT SEAL LOCATION NO SCALE ABUTMENT WITH BACKWALL JOINT SEAL APPROACH SLAB BRIDGE LIMITS BACKWALL JOINT SEAL TABLE BRIDGE NAME JOINT SEAL LOCATION EXISTING WATERSTOP APPROX DEPTH TO CLEAN EXP JOINT (INCHES) BRIDGE NUMBER MINIMUM "MR" (INCHES) DILLON ROAD GRADE SEPARATION 56C0591 Abut 1 BW Abut 3 BW YES YES 6363 63 12 2 * 12 2 * LENGTH TO CLEAN EXP JOINT (FEET) APPROX LENGTH OF JOINT SEAL (FEET) 63 * Bonded Joint Seal BW Backwall NOTES: 1. For details not shown see Caltrans Standard Plan B6-21. 2. Seal must satisfy both minimum Movement Rating (MR) and gap width requirements. 3. Bonded joint seals must conform to the general path of seals shown on Standard Plan B6-21 - JOINT SEAL DETAILS. Page 407 Item 13.
s
FH FH s FH s s s FH s s s s s s s s s s
FH FH FH FH sFH FH s s s sFH
FH s FH s s s s s s s s
FH s
FH s s
FH
FH s s FH ss s
FH s
FHFH s s s FH FH s FH s s s s s FH FH
FH ss s FH s s s s
FHFH s s FH FH FH s FH s s ss FH FH
FH s
FH s s s FH FH s s FH s s s FH s s s
FH s s s s s s s s s s FH s FH
FH s s FH s s s s s s sss s s s s s FH FH ss s s sss s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ss s s s s s s s s s s FH s
FH
FH s
FH s s s s s ss s FH s s FH FH FH
FH s s
FH
FH s s s s FHs FH FH FH s FH FH s
FH FH s
FH s s FH FH
FH s
FH
FHFH s
FH s FH s s s s FH s s FH s s FH s FH FH
FH
FH s s
FH s s
FH
FH FH FH s s s s s s FH s s s s s s s ss FH FH s
FHFH FH s s
FH FH
FH FH FH s
FHs

FHFH FH
FH s FHs s s s s s
FH s s s s s s s s s s s FH s FH s s ss s FH FH FH

FSC E I S E N H OW E R D R I V E FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH
FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH
FH
FHFH

FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH FHFH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH FH
FH FH
FHFH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH

FHFH FH FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH FH
FH FH FH EL-01 INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U MARIO PEREZ DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.E.E. NO.: E22246 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED KPSR BY: KPJR K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ JR. 082823 191 B1 70 VARIED LED MULTI 96 WAYNE TYLER LIGHTING SPHERE BOLLARD VCL-KPJ-28-RGB- COLOR-TYLERSHIELD-UNV SEE DETAIL E/EL-20 1 RGBW EL-3 SHEET # DESCRIPTION EL-1 SUMMARIES & SCHEDULES SHEET INDEX EL-2 LIGHTING PLAN 1 EL-4 LIGHTING PLAN 3 EL-5 LIGHTING PLAN 4 LIGHTING PLAN 2 MFR & CATALOG NO. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE - SYMBOL FIXTURE VOLTS TYPE MOUNTING

QTY LAMPS
INDUC
LED
LPS
MH
HPS
120
208
240
277
NO.

WATTS
WELL
SURF

SPECIAL

WALL DESCRIPTION
FLOUR

POLE TYPE
QTY
LUMENS
CBCP
KELVIN
12 480 CVAG COACHELLA SPECIFIED BY: VISUAL CONCEPTS LIGHTING INC. PH: 858-278-4503 ANY CHANGE OR DEVIATION FROM THE LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS ON PLAN SHALL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. ALL ASSOCIATED COSTS INCURRED FOR HAVING TO RE-RUN PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING STUDIES, REVISE ELECTRICAL PLANS AND CIRCUITRY, REVISE ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES, REVISE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULES, RE-CALCULATE TITLE-24 MANDATORY MEASURES, AND RESUBMIT TO THE BUILDING PLAN CHECK DEPARTMENT SHALL BE PAID BACK TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR. NO REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN REQUESTED BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEER OF RECORD SUBMITTALS FOR APPROVAL FOR ALL LIGHTING PRODUCT SHOWN IN SCHEDULE BELOW PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT. APPROVED EQUALS OF LIGHTING PRODUCT MAY BE CONSIDERED. SAMPLES FOR MOCK-UP SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR CONSIDERATION PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF DEVIATION OF LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE ON QUANTITIES: PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE QUANTITIES OF LUMINAIRES AND ALL ASSOCIATED LIGHTING PRODUCTS ARE CONFIRMED BY COUNTING THE ITEMS DIRECTLY ON THE PROVIDED DRAWING SHEETS. WHILE WE HAVE INCORPORATED THESE QUANTITIES TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES IN PLANS MAY OCCUR, AND SOME QUANTITIES MAY NOT HAVE BEEN UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR AND DISTRIBUTOR SCOPE OF WORK INSTALL NEW LED COLOR CHANGING LIGHTS AND CONTROLS. ALL LIGHTS ARE PER CVAG. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE FOR FIXTURE AND POLE TYPES. LIGHTS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY A MASTER CONTROL SYSTEM LOCATED IN THE ELECTRICAL CONTROLS CABINETS AND POWERED BY METER PEDESTALS. SPECIFICATIONS ALL SPLICES BELOW GRADE SHALL BE MADE IN APPROVED PULL BOXES AND SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. USE ONLY EPOXY ENCAPSULATED TYPE 3M BAGS OR EQUAL. BELOW GRADE PULL BOXES TO BE "OLDCASTLE" MODEL FL12T (OR EQUAL) WITH BOLT DOWN COVER MARKED "ELECTRICAL". LEAVE 2' SLACK OF CONDUCTORS IN PULLBOX. SIZE PER SECTION 370-28, CEC. SEE DETAIL D/EL-20. ALL CONDUIT BELOW GRADE TO BE MINIMUM 3/4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CONDUIT EXPOSED ABOVE GRADE TO BE MINIMUM 1/2" EMT. ALL BELOW GRADE CONDUIT SHALL BE SEALED WITH DUCT-SEAL UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION. ALL ELECTRICIANS TO HAVE PROOF OF CALIFORNIA ELECTRICIANS CERTIFICATE/CREDENTIALS. ALL ABOVE GRADE JUNCTION BOXES TO BE WEATHER-PROOF. SIZE PER SECTION 370-28, CEC. ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COMMERCIAL AND SHALL CARRY A U.L. LABEL. 14. 15. 4. A. B. FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS TO PERFORM ELECTRICAL WORK SHOWN, NOTED OR SCHEDULED FOR A COMPLETE AND FINISHED INSTALLATION. 2. 1. THE GENERAL CONDITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE SPECIFICATION. 3. 5. SECURE AND PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTION CERTIFICATES. 6. WIRE SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR COPPER WITH 600 VOLT INSULATION. ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS ARE NOT PERMITTED. #12 AND SMALLER SHALL BE SOLID. #10 AND LARGER SHALL BE STRANDED. MINIMUM WIRE SIZE SHALL BE #12. ALL WIRE AND CABLE SHALL BE NEW AND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE SITE IN UNBROKEN PACKAGES. ALL WIRING OF ANY TYPE SHALL BE IN CONDUIT. 7. A. GENERAL WIRING SHALL BE THWN OR THHN. 8. ABOVE GRADE WIRE CONNECTORS SHALL BE BY "SCOTCHLOCK" OR EQUAL FOR #8 OR SMALLER AND T&B "LOCK-TITE" FOR #6 AND LARGER. THIS CONTRACTOR SHALL DO ALL CUTTING, CHASING OR CHANNELING AND PATCHING REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK UNDER THIS DIVISION. ANY CUTTING SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. 9. PROVIDE SAFETY AND DISCONNECT SWITCHES, SHALL BE FUSED OR NON-FUSED AS CALLED FOR ON DRAWINGS AND AS REQUIRED BY CODE. SWITCHES SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY, LOAD AND HORSEPOWER RATED AS MANUFACTURED BY SQUARE D, GENERAL ELECTRIC OR EQUAL. 10. 11. JUNCTION, PULL BOXES AND COVERS WITHIN BUILDING SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL, CODE GAUGE SIZE AND ACCESSIBLE. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL FIELD CHANGES IN HIS WORK AS THE JOB PROGRESSES, AND UPON COMPLETION SHALL TURN OVER TO THE OWNER A "RECORD" SET OF PRINTS SHOWING THE CHANGES. 12. ALL ELECTRIC WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO BE READILY ACCESSIBLE FOR OPERATING, SERVICING MAINTAINING AND REPAIRING. HANGERS SHALL INCLUDE ALL MISCELLANEOUS STEEL, SUCH AS CHANNELS, RODS, ETC., NECESSARY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WORK AND SHALL BE FASTENED TO STEEL, CONCRETE OR MASONRY, BUT NOT TO PIPING. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE CONCEALED WHERE POSSIBLE. EXPOSED CONDUITS SHALL BE IN STRAIGHT LINES PARALLEL WITH OR AT RIGHT ANGLES TO COLUMN LINES OR BEAMS AND SEPARATED AT LEASED 3" FROM WATER LINES WHEREVER THEY RUN ALONGSIDE OR ACROSS SUCH LINES. CONDUCTORS SHALL BE ON CONDUIT, DUCTS, OR APPROVED RACEWAYS. 13. 16. 17. 18. ALL GROUND CONDUCTORS SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER WITH APPROVED CONNECTOR AT PULL BOXES AND CONNECTED TO GROUND LUG INSIDE POLE. 19. SEE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR SITE, SEWER AND WATER (ETC.) IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG ALERT" FOR MARK-OUT PRIOR TO TRENCHING AS REQUIRED. 21. THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC AND ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING HOW TO CONNECT THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. WHILE THE DRAWING IS AT ACTUAL SCALE, THE SYMBOLS REFERENCED ARE NOT, AND MAY APPEAR TO SHOW THE EQUIPMENT IN PLACES NOT INTENDED. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE POINTS/METER LOCATIONS, POLES, PULL BOXES BUILDING LIGHT LOCATIONS, SERVICE EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS AND OTHER ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE CLIENT BY MEANS OF A "REQUEST FOR INFORMATION" (RFI). CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL LIGHT LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION AND DURING STAKING. REFER TO LIGHT STANDARD DETAIL FOR STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG ALERT" FOR MARK-OUT PRIOR TO TRENCHING AS REQUIRED. 22. PANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 408.4, CEC. 23. NATIVE SOIL SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE FOR TRENCH BACK FILL PROVIDED THAT THE FILL MATERIAL USED SHALL PASS THROUGH A 1" SIEVE (CITY STANDARDS). SEE DETAIL C/EL-20. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL EACH CIRCUIT WITH PHENOLIC PLASTIC LABEL TAGS IN ANY DEVICE THAT HAS ACCESS. THIS SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT POLES, PULL BOXES, PANELS, AND ETCETERA. PANEL, CIRCUIT NUMBER AND VOLTAGE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED. TAGS SHALL BE AFFIXED WITH NYLON ZIP-TIES. ABOVE GRADE CONDUIT SHALL BE STANDARD RIGID STEEL ACCORDING TO CODE REQUIREMENTS. CONDUIT SHALL BE CONCEALED IN FINISHED AREAS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. RIGID CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COMPRESSION TYPE. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 OR 80 PVC BURIED A MINIMUM OF 24". LEGEND CVAG; ARTS AND MUSIC LINE COACHELLA VALLEY, CA ALL 90 DEGREE ELBOWS TO BE FACTORY MADE BENDS. PRIVATE LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE JOINT TRENCH WITH PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR ANY AND ALL UTILITY AND CITY INSPECTIONS. 1.2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY/BUILDING CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE 2022 IBC, AND THE 2022NEC AND TITLE 24 ENERGY AND DISABLED ACCESS REGULATIONS. MATERIALS, PRODUCTS AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF, SHALL BE NEW AND SUCH AS APPEAR ON THE UNDERWRITER'S LABORATORIES LIST OF APPROVED ITEMS AND SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM, IEEE, 2017 NEC, NEMA, AND OTHER RECOGNIZED STANDARDS AND SHALL BE SIZED IN CONFORMITY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE CODES, WHICHEVER ARE MORE STRINGENT. THE WORD "PROVIDE" AS USED HEREIN MEANS TO FURNISH AND INSTALL COMPLETE. FOR ABOVE SPECIFIED PRODUCT, CONTACT ANNIE MITCHEL WITH OCS LIGHTING & CONTROLS @ 858.514.4000 || [email protected] G1 263 VARIED MULTI LED 3 ORGANIC LIGHTING ORGALED-3R-RGBW/013100 INGRADE MARKER LIGHTS SEE DETAIL A/EL-19 1 RGBW C1 26VARIED LED MULTI 66 TECHNILUM LIGHTING CRL-12-5R-RGBW-33W-UNV-CUSTOM-COLOR LIGHT COLUMN SEE DETAIL B/EL-20 1 RGBW C2 6 VARIED LED MULTI 66 TECHNILINUM LIGHTING CRL-12-5R-RGBW-33W-UNV-CUSTOM-COLOR- SPKR LIGHT COLUMN W/SOUND SEE DETAIL B/EL-20 1 RGBW S1 32566 LED MULTI 0 SOLAR PATH USA SWL-YHDD1-PANTONE 3265 MARKER LIGHTS SEE DETAIL B/EL-23 1 C3 25VARIED LED MULTI 40 LUMENPULSE LIGHTING MOBC6-R-VARIES-120-FR-XX-RGBW40K-CRI80- 5-H48-CC-DMX/RDM-SP-AB- LIGHT COLUMN SEE DETAIL A/EL-20 1 RGBW QTY (4) - 12', (6) - 14', (6) - 16', (6) - 18', (3) - 20' * EL-8 EL-6 EL-7 EL-9 LIGHTING PLAN 7 EL-10 LIGHTING PLAN 8 LIGHTING PLAN 6 EL-13 EL-11 LIGHTING PLAN 9 EL-12 LIGHTING PLAN 10 EL-14 LIGHTING PLAN 12 EL-15 LIGHTING PLAN 13 LIGHTING PLAN 11 EL-18 EL-16 LIGHTING PLAN 14 EL-17 LIGHTING PLAN 15 EL-21 EL-19 DETAILS EL-20 DETAILS DETAILS BELOW GRADE ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND WIRE RUN. SEE PLANS FOR TYPE AND NUMBER OF WIRES. BELOW GRADE PULLBOX. SEE SPEC. 1 AND DETAIL D/EL-20. CIRCUIT DESIGNATION. 1ST LETTER INDICATES PANEL. REMAINING NUMBER'S INDICATE CIRCUIT POSITIONS. 100A, 1Ø, 3W, 120/240V METER PEDESTAL. SEE PLAN FOR METER PEDESTAL # AND SCHEDULES/DETAILS D/EL-23 AND A/EL-24. A-1 BELOW GRADE LIGHTING CONTROLLER. SEE DETAIL C/EL-23 FOR INSTALLATION AND FOR SPECS. BELOW GRADE LOW VOLTAGE CONTROLS CONDUIT AND WIRE RUN. SEE PLANS FOR TYPE AND NUMBER OF WIRES. UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE POINT. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE ORDER. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL LIGHTING CONTROL CABINET. SEE DETAIL A/EL-21 AND A/EL-22 FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. * RGBW SPHERE BOLLARD. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL E/EL-20 RGBW INGRADE MARKER LIGHT. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL A/EL-19 RGBW LIGHT COLUMN. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL B/EL-20 RGBW LIGHT COLUMN WITH SOUND. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL B/EL-20 SOLAR MARKER LIGHT. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL B/EL-23 RGBW LIGHT COLUMN WITH VARYING HEIGHTS. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND DETAIL A/EL-20 EL-22 DETAILS EL-23 DETAILS EL-24 PANEL SCHEDULES LIGHTING PLAN 5 SUMMARIES AND SCHEDUELS LIGHTING PLAN 16 LIGHTING PLAN 17 KEY MAP 168 S2 401 66 LED MULTI 0 SOLAR PATH USA SWL-YHDD1-PANTONE 312 MARKER LIGHTS SEE DETAIL B/EL-23 1 S3 228 66 LED MULTI 0 SOLAR PATH USA SWL-YHDD1-PANTONE 320 MARKER LIGHTS SEE DETAIL B/EL-23 1 L1 5 RUNS985LED MULTI 4/FT TRAXON EXCUE (4 RUNS) QTY (15) K8L-3-944411-08 (480W/RUN) (1 RUN) QTY (8) K8L-3-944411-08 + QTY (1) K8L-3-944411-01 (260W TOTAL) LINEAR LED LIGHT SEE DETAIL B/EL-23 1 Page 408 Item 13.

FH FH FH
B
FH K-1 K-1 K-1 FH FH FH FH FH K-1 K-1 K-1 K-1
s
FH FH
s FH
s
s
s FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s
s
s

FH FH FH FH
s
FH FH
s
s
s
s
FH
FH
s FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
FH
s
FH
s
s
FH
FH
s
s FH
s
s
s
FH
s
FHFH
s s s FH FH
s FH
s s s
s
s FH FH
FH
s
s FH
s
s
s
s
FHFH s
s FH FH FH
s FH
s
s
s
s FH FH
FH
s
FH
s
s
s FH
FH
s
s FH s
s
s FH
s
s
s
FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s FHs FH
FH
s
s FH
s s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s
s
s FH FH
s
s
s
s
ss
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
FH
s
FH
FH
s
FH
s
s
s s
s
s
s
s FH s
s FH FH FH
FH
s
s
FH
FH
s
s
s
s FHs FH FH FH s FH FH
FH
s FH
s
FH
s
s FH FH
FH
s
FH
FHFH s
FH
s FH
s
s
s
s FH
s
s FH
s
s FH
s FH FH FH
FH s
s
FH
s s
FH

FH FH FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
sFH
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
sFH FH

FHFH FH
s
s
FH FH
FH FH FH s
s
FH FH
FH FH s
FH FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
FH
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s FH
s FH
s
s
s ss FH FH FH
FSC

E I S E N H OW E R D R I V E FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH
FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH
FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH
FH FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FHFH
FH FH
FH FH
FHFH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH

FHFH FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FSC
FH
FH FH
FH FH FH FH K-3 K-5 K-7 K-9 INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O
LL AC
O
EB
F
R
E
Y
D GI
U ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O
LL AC
O
EB
F
R
E
Y
D GI
U MARIO PEREZ DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.E.E. NO.: E22246 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED KPSR BY: KPJR K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ JR. 082823 191 MATCHLINE: 1-1 NORTH
MATCHLINE: BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE: SEE PLAN EL-14
MATCHLINE:ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE: 1-1 0' 20' 40' 80' NORTH SCALE: 1"=40'-0"
MATCHLINE: 2-2
MATCHLINE: 2-2
MATCHLINE: SEE PLAN EL-17 NORTH NORTH NORTH
1 LIGHTING CONTROLS CABINET 'K'. SEE DETAIL A/EL-21 AND A/EL-22 FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. BELOW GRADE PULLBOX. SEE SPEC. 1 AND DETAIL D/EL-20 FOR INSTALLATION. UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE POINT. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. 234 5 PROVIDE 100A, 120/240V, 1Ø, 3W METER PEDESTAL 'K' PER UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. SEE DETAIL D/EL-23 AND A/EL-24 FOR INSTALLATION & PANEL SCHEDULE. UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE CONDUIT. VERIFY TYPE AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. 6 PROVIDE (1) 1" C-2#10, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-1 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 7 SOLAR MARKER LIGHT. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE AND INSTALLATION DETAIL B/EL-23. 8 AVENUE 48 AVENUE 48 DILLON RD DILLON RD DILLON RD (TYP. ALL) 8
1 2
3 4
7 (TYP. ALL)
5 5 (TYP. ALL)
6 (TYP. CIR.)
6 (TYP. CIR.) LIGHTING PLAN 15 KEY MAP SHEET NOTES EL-16 183

GRAPEFRUIT BLVD
RAILROAD (TYP. ALL.) 19 (TYP. ALL) 8 P/L P/L P/L
9 9 PROVIDE (1) 2" C-12#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-6 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 10 TRANSITION INTO BRIDGE BARRIER WALL. ROUTE TO BRIDGE J-BOX. SEE DETAILS A/EL-23. PROVIDE (1) 2" C-12#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-6 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. 9 12 PROVIDE (1) 3" C-12#6 (K-3,5,7,9,11,13), 6#10, 1#10 GND. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 9 5 (TYP. ALL) 5 (TYP. ALL) 15 (TYP. CIR.) 10 15 (TYP. ALL) 11 PROVIDE (1) 2"C-10#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-5 #9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. ROUTE CONDUIT IN BARRIER. 11 12 16 16 12 PROVIDE (1) 2"C-8#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-4 #9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. ROUTE CONDUIT IN BARRIER. 13 13 PROVIDE (1) 1-1/2"C-6#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-3 #9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. ROUTE CONDUIT IN BARRIER. 14 14 PROVIDE (1) 1-1/2"C-4#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-4 #9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. ROUTE CONDUIT IN BARRIER. 15 15 CALTRANS BARRIER J-BOX. SEE INSTALLATION DETAIL A/EL-23 16 PROVIDE (1) 3/4"C-TRAXON STARTER CABLE WITH CONNECTOR AND 4' LEAD FOR POWER AND CONTROL. ROUTE FROM J-BOX TO LIGHT CHANNEL. SEE DETAIL A/EL-23. (TYP. ALL) 17 17 PULLBOX INSTALLED IN SOFTSCAPE BEFORE BRIDGE FOR TRANSITION. SEE DETAIL A/EL-23. Page 409 Item 13.

K1-1 K-11 K-13 s
FH FH s FH ss s FH s s s s s s s s s s
FH FH FH FH sFH FH s s s sFH
FHs FH s s s s s s s s
FH s
FH s s
FH
FH s s FH ss s
FH s
FHFH s s s FH FH s FH s s s s s FH FH
FH ss FH s s s s
FHFH s s FH FH FH s FH s s ss FH FH
FH s
FH s s s FH
FH s s FH s s s FH s s s
FH s s s s s s s s s s FH s FH
FH s s FH s s s s ss s ss s s s s s FH FH ss s s ss s s s s s s s ss ss s s s s s s s s s ss s s s s s s s s s s FH s
FH
FH s
FH ss s s s s ss FH s s FH FH FH
FH ss
FH
FH ss s s FHs FH FH FH s FH FH
FHs FH s
FH s s FH FH
FH s
FH
FHFH s
FH s FH s s s s FH s s FH s s FH s FH FH FH
FH s s
FH s s
FH
FH FH FH s s s s s s sFH s s s s s s ss sFH FH
FHFH FH s s
FH FH
FH FH FH s s
FH FH
FH FH s
FH FHs s s s s s
FHs s s s s s s s s s s FH s FH s s s s s FH FH FH

FSC E I S E N H OW E R D R I V E FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH
FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH
FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH
FH FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FHFH
FH FH
FH FH
FHFH

FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FH
FH
FH

FH FH FH FH FH FH

FHFH FH FH

FH FH FH

FH FH FH

FHFH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH
FSC
FH
FH FH
FH FH FH K1-3 K1-5 s K1-7 INFO PROJECT NO: CAD DWG FILE: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. DATE APPROVED BY: R.C.E. NO. SHEET TITLE SHEET OF DRAWING NO.

ISSUE
Line measures 1 inch on full scale drawing, if not 1 inch scale accordingly. DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U ENGINEER OF RECORD'S SEAL DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT O LL AC O EB F RE Y D GI U MARIO PEREZ DATE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: R.E.E. NO.: E22246 DESIGNED BY: CHECKED KPSR BY: KPJR K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ SR. K.PEREZ JR. 082823 191 NORTH MATCHLINE: BELOW RIGHT MATCHLINE: ABOVE LEFT MATCHLINE: BELOW RIGHT MATCHLINE: SEE PLANEL-18 MATCHLINE: ABOVE LEFT 0' 20' 40' 80' SCALE: 1"=40'-0" NORTH MATCHLINE: SEE PLAN EL-16

DILLON ROAD

DILLON ROAD
DILLON ROAD LIGHTING PLAN 16 KEY MAP SHEET NOTES EL-17 184 AVE 48 1 LIGHTING CONTROLS CABINET 'K1'. SEE DETAIL A/EL-21 AND A/EL-22 FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. BELOW GRADE PULLBOX. SEE SPEC. 1 AND DETAIL D/EL-20 FOR INSTALLATION. UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE POINT. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. 2345 PROVIDE 100A, 120/240V, 1Ø, 3W METER PEDESTAL 'K1' PER UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. SEE DETAIL D/EL-23 AND A/EL-24 FOR INSTALLATION & PANEL SCHEDULE. UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE CONDUIT. VERIFY TYPE AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH UTILITY SERVICE ORDER. 67 1 23 12 9 6 7 (TYP. CIR) 11 11 10 9 9 7 (TYP. CIR) 7 (TYP. CIR) 96 69 7 (TYP. CIR) 7 (TYP. CIR) 6 5 (TYP. ALL) 5 (TYP. ALL) 5 PROVIDE (1) 1" C-2#10, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-1 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 10 PROVIDE (1) 1" C-4#10, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-2 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. PROVIDE Q-TRAN VAULT WITH DRIVER AND DMX CONTROLLER. SEE DETAIL C/EL-23. PROVIDE 1/2" C-(1) # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLE. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 8 7 911 PROVIDE (1) 1" C-6#10, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-3 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 12 PROVIDE (1) 2" C-4#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-2 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. PROVIDE (1) 1 1/2" C-2#6, 1#10 GND. AND (1) 1"C-1 # 9729 BELDEN CONTROL CABLES. BURY 24" BELOW GRADE. 4 13 6 7 (TYP. CIR) 15 8 812 14 13 13 CALTRANS BARRIER J-BOX. SEE INSTALLATION DETAIL A/EL-23. 14 PROVIDE (1) 3/4"C-TRAXON STARTER CABLES WITH CONNECTOR AND 4' LEAD FOR POWER AND CONTROLS. ROUTE FROM J-BOX TO LIGHT CHANNEL. SEE DETAIL A/EL-23. 15 CALTRANS BARRIER JBOX. SEE INSTALLATION DETAIL A/EL-23. Page 410 Item 13.

STAFF REPORT
9/10/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Delia Granados, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Designate a Voting Delegate and Alternates to the League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council designate a voting member and two alternates to attend the Friday, October 10, 2025, League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The voting delegate is required to register and attend the League Conference.

BACKGROUND:

The League of California Cities is one of the primary lobbying organizations for municipalities at the State level. A number of key policy decisions are made in order to support cities and represent municipal interests to the Assembly and the Governor. In order to ensure that the views of the City of Coachella are represented to the League in formulating their policies, the Council must designate a delegate to represent the City at the League Conference and the Annual Business Meeting.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The League’s 2025 Annual Conference & Expo is scheduled for October 8-10, 2025, in Long Beach, California. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (during General Assembly). The General Assembly will be held on Friday, October 10, 2024. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy.

The City of Coachella must designate a voting delegate to represent the City at the Annual Business Meeting. Staff is requesting the Council also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates. One of these delegates may represent the City in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to attend the conference.

The designation of a voting delegate and alternates must be done by City Council action and a copy of the Council action reflecting the Council’s selection must be forwarded to the League no

Item 14.
later than September 24, 2025. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only.

ALTERNATIVES:

The only alternative action is for the Council to choose not to designate a representative for the City at the Annual Conference and Business Meeting of the League of California Cities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The voting delegate is required to register and attend the League Conference. The City will incur any expenses necessary for this registration for the delegate to attend the conference during this period.

Attachment: Annual Conference Voting Procedures and Schedule

Item 14.
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org

DATE: Wednesday, July 16, 2025
TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 8-10, 2025 Long Beach Convention Center
Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.

Taking place on Oct. 10, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.

To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.

Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.

Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 24. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.

Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.

Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website.

Council Action Advised by September 24, 2025

Item 14.

For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.

Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.

Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.

Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 17, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 18, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.

The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.

Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.

Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 24. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].

Attachments:
• General Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly

Item 14.
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines

1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.

2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.

3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.

4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.

5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.

6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.

Item 14.

Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.

How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.

The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.

The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.

Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.

Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.

Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.

Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.

The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.

Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.

Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.

During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.

Cal Cities policy
development is a memberinformed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.

For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.

General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). Page 416 Item 14.

STAFF REPORT
9/10/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Cástulo R. Estrada, Utilities Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. SD – 2025 – 05 of the Coachella Sanitary District Adopting The Updated Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) in Compliance with State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. SD – 2025 – 05 of the Coachella Sanitary District Adopting the Updated Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) in Compliance with State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Coachella sewer system also known as the Coachella Sanitary District consists of sewers that collect local flows generated from the City’s residential, commercial, and industrial areas and other areas outside the city limits and discharge to the City’s wastewater treatment plant on Avenue 54 with a capacity of 4.5 million gallons per day.

The Coachella Sanitary District’s collection system includes about 107 miles of sanitary sewers ranging in size from 4 inches to 54 inches in diameter. The system has over 8,200 connections with 1,900 manholes and two main pump stations.

On May 2, 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Order No. 2006- 0003-DWQ, which established Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems.

On December 6, 2022, the reissued State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems, Water Quality Order No. 2022-0103 DWQ, which became effective on June 5, 2023. This updated several requirements of the WDR and SSMP.

The requirements state that all federal and state agencies, municipalities, counties, districts, and other public entities that own or operate sanitary sewer systems greater than one mile in length that collect and/or convey untreated or partially treated wastewater to a publicly owned treatment facility in the State of California are required to meet these standards:

Item 15.
• Take all reasonable steps to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), and in the event that an SSO does occur, take all possible steps to contain and mitigate the impacts and report the SSO to the statewide reporting system;
• Properly, manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the sanitary sewer system and ensure that the system operators are adequately trained and possess adequate knowledge, skills, and abilities; • Provide capacity to convey base flows and peak flows, including flows related to wet weather events; and
• Develop and implement a written Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), approved by the governing board at a public meeting.

DISSUSSION/ANALYSIS:

On May 28, 2025, the City’s Council approved to proceed with an on-call agreement with Dudek to provide services related to the updating of the Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). During the process, Utilities Staff met with Dudek staff to discuss the current processes and to comply with the statewide general waste discharge requirements.

The Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) is a written document that details how the sewer system is managed, operated, and maintained. This will help reduce and prevent sewer spills, as well as mitigate any SSOs that do occur. The SSMP must include 11 specific elements. Those elements are Goals, Organization, Legal Authority, Operations/Maintenance, Design/Performance, Spill Emergency Response, Sewer Pipe Blockage Control, System Evaluation/Capital Improvements, Monitoring, Internal Audits and Communication Plan.

The SSMP must be updated every six (6) years, and must include any significant program changes, and re-certification. The Board of Directors/City Council is required to approve the SSMP in a public meeting. The adoption of the attached resolution satisfies this requirement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No Fiscal Impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution No. SD-2025-05
Coachella SD SSMP Update 2025_FINAL

Item 15.

RESOLUTION NO. SD-2025-05

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COACHELLA

SANITARY DISTRICT ADOPTING THE UPDATED SANITARY SEWER

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP) IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD ORDER NO. 2022-0103-DWQ.

WHEREAS, in December 2022, the State of California’s Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Order Number WQ 2022-0103-DWQ that updated General Waste Discharge Requirements for sanitary sewer systems designed to convey sewage greater than one (1) mile in length (the “Order”) which became effective on June 5, 2023; and WHEREAS, all federal and state agencies, municipalities, counties, districts and other public entities that own or operate sanitary sewer systems greater than one mile in length that collect and/or convey untreated or partially treated wastewater to a public owned treatment facility in the State of California are required to comply with the terms of this Order; and Coachella Sanitary District sanitary sewer system is greater than one mile in length and subject to the Order, which requires that the existing Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) be updated; and WHEREAS, the Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) is a document that updates the Coachella Sanitary District permit issued by the SWRCB and addresses procedures to operate, maintain and manage wastewater collection systems and provides the guidelines and procedures to reduce the number and frequency of sanitary sewer overflows (“SSOs”) and thereby to decrease the risk to human health and the environment in our community; and WHEREAS, the SSMP must include 11 specific elements and must be approved by the Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, the Coachella Sanitary District updated SSMP, dated as of August 2025, has been reviewed by the Utilities Director, and now is ready for approval by the Board of Directors and certification and submittal to the California SWRCB; and WHEREAS, upon approval by the SWRCB, the SSMP will be made available on the City’s website and will supersede any and all prior SSMP’s; this SSMP also is subject to periodic review and update.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT, COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the foregoing is true, correct and adopted.

2. That the Board of Directors recognizes that sanitary sewer operators are subject to and must comply with the requirements of the SSMP Permit with the goal of reducing sanitary sewer overflows spills.

Item 15.

Resolution No. SD-2025-05

3. The Utilities Director is authorized to execute documents pertaining to the certification of the Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) and to process the online California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) sanitary sewer database form on behalf of the City of Coachella in accordance with State Water Resource Control Board guidelines.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 2025. ___________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez
President
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Angela M. Zepeda
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
City Attorney

Item 15.

Resolution No. SD-2025-05

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF COACHELLA
)
) ss.
)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. SD-2025-05 was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Coachella Sanitary District at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of September, 2025, by the following vote of the Board:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Delia Granados
Deputy City Clerk

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District
Sewer System Management Plan
California State Resources Control Board
Prepared for:

Coachella Sanitary District
87075 Avenue 54
Coachella, California 92236
Contact: Robert Huerta, Superintendent of Sanitation
Castulo Estrada, Utilities Director
August 2025

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page i Table of Contents

SECTIONS
Acronyms and Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................................ iii Definitions........................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Purpose and Background ................................................................................................................................................................ vii Elements of a SSMP........................................................................................................................................................................ viii 1 SSMP Goal and Introduction......................................................................................................................................................1 2 Organization .................................................................................................................................................................................5 3 Legal Authority ..........................................................................................................................................................................10 4 Operation and Maintenance Program..................................................................................................................................14 5 Design and Performance Provisions......................................................................................................................................18 6 Spill Emergency Response Plan.............................................................................................................................................19 7 Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program.................................................................................................................................43 8 System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements....................................................................................45 9 Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications......................................................................................................48 10 Internal Audits...........................................................................................................................................................................53 11 Communication Program.........................................................................................................................................................54 Appendix A.........................................................................................................................................................................................55 The Reissued WDR: Order Number WQ 2022-0103-DWQ.................................................................................................55 Appendix B........................................................................................................................................................................................57 Coachella Sanitary District and City of Coachella Boundary Map .....................................................................................57 Appendix C ........................................................................................................................................................................................58 Chapter 13.01 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the Municipal Code............................................................................58 Appendix D........................................................................................................................................................................................60 Chapter 13.02 (Wastewater Treatment) of the Municipal Code .......................................................................................60 Appendix E ........................................................................................................................................................................................62 Chapter 13.16 (Water Quality Control) of the Municipal Code ..........................................................................................62 Appendix F.........................................................................................................................................................................................65 Updated Sewer Collection System Map................................................................................................................................65 Appendix G........................................................................................................................................................................................67 Notification Requirements ......................................................................................................................................................67 Appendix H........................................................................................................................................................................................71 Reporting Requirements .........................................................................................................................................................71 Appendix I..........................................................................................................................................................................................83 Sewer System Management Plan Change Log ....................................................................................................................83 Appendix J.........................................................................................................................................................................................87 SSMP Monitoring Parameters ................................................................................................................................................87

Item 15.

Table of Contents
Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page ii TABLES
Table 1-1: SSMP Update Schedule ..................................................................................................................................................2 Table 1-2: Sewer System Assets.......................................................................................................................................................3 Table 1-3: Number of Service Connections.....................................................................................................................................4 Table 2-1: Key Staff Roles..................................................................................................................................................................7 Table 2-2: Department Roles & Responsibilities............................................................................................................................7 Table 2-3: Positions that Implement the District’s SSMP .............................................................................................................8 Table 2-4: Contact Numbers for Chain of Communication...........................................................................................................9 Table 3-1: WDR Requirements.......................................................................................................................................................11 Table 4-1: Equipment and Replacement Parts Inventory ..........................................................................................................17 Table 6.1: Contact Numbers for Chain of Communication........................................................................................................20 Table 6.2: Active Contractors for Sewer System Repair.............................................................................................................21 Table 6.3: Equipment Rental Companies and Contractors for Spill Response ......................................................................23 Table 6.4: On-Call General Civil Engineering Firms.....................................................................................................................23 Table 6-5: Spill Category 1: Spills to Surface Waters..................................................................................................................27 Table 6-6: Spill Category 2: Spills of 1,000 Gallons or Greater That Do Not Discharge to Surface Waters........................28 Table 6-7: Spill Category 3: Spills of Equal or Greater than 50 Gallons and Less than 1,000 Gallons That Does Not Discharge to Surface Waters...........................................................................................................................................29 Table 6-8: Spill Category 4: Spills Less Than 50 Gallons That Do Not Discharge to Surface Waters..................................30 Table 6.9: Spill Response Equipment...........................................................................................................................................35 Figure 6-1: Sewer Spill Water Quality Monitoring Locations......................................................................................................38 Table 6.10: Water Quality Sample Collection, Preservation, and Analysis ..............................................................................39 Table 9-1: SSMP Update Schedule ...............................................................................................................................................48 Table 9-2: SSMP Monitoring Parameters, by SSMP Element....................................................................................................49 Table 9-3 Preventive Operation and Maintenance Activities to Track......................................................................................52 Table 9-4: Spill Trends from 2014 to 2024.................................................................................................................................52

FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Organizational Chart.......................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 6-1: Sewer Spill Water Quality Monitoring Locations......................................................................................................38

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page iii Acronyms and Abbreviations
Abbreviation Acronym
BMP Best Management Practices
CCTV Closed-Circuit Television
CIP Capital Improvement Program
City City of Coachella
COC Chain-of-Custody
DCS Drainage Conveyance System
District Coachella Sanitary District
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CWEA California Water Environment Association
FOG Fats, Oils, & Grease
FSE Food Service Establishment
GIS Geographic Information System
GPS Global Positioning System
Greenbook Standard Publication for Public Works and Standard Plans for Public Works I&I Inflow & Infiltration
IID Imperial Irrigation District
LRO Legally Responsible Official
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OES Office of Emergency Services (aka Cal OES)
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Order SWRCB Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ adopted December 6, 2022 and effective June 5, 2023
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RSW Receiving Surface Water
SERP Spill Emergency Response Plan
SSMP Sewer System Management Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
WDID Waste Discharge Identification Number
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements, also referred to as the Sanitary Sewer Systems Waste Discharge Requirements (SSSWDR)

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page iv Definitions
Annual Report - A mandatory report in which the Enrollee provides a calendar-year update of its efforts to prevent spills.

California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) - The statewide database that provides for mandatory electronic reporting as required in State and Regional Water Board-issued waste discharge requirements.

Data Submitter - An individual designated and authorized by the Enrollee’s Legally Responsible Official (LRO) to enter spill data into the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. Data Submitters do not have the authority of an LRO to certify reports within the CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.

Enrollee - A public, private, or other non-governmental entity that has obtained approval for regulatory coverage under the General Order, including:
• A state agency, municipality, special district, or other public entity that owns and/or operates one or more sanitary sewer systems:
o greater than one (1) mile in length (each individual sanitary sewer system); o one mile or less in length where the State Water Resources Control Board or a Regional Water Quality Control Board requires regulatory coverage under the Order, or • A federal agency, private company, or other non-governmental entity that owns and/or operates a sanitary sewer system of any size where the State Water Resources Control Board or a Regional Water Quality Control Board requires regulatory coverage under the Order in response to a history of spills, proximity to surface water, or other factors supporting regulatory coverage.

Exfiltration - The underground exiting of sewage from a sanitary sewer system through cracks, offset or separated joints, or failed infrastructure due to corrosion or other factors.

Governing Entity - A governing entity includes but is not limited to the following:
• A publicly elected governing board, council, or commission of a municipal agency; • A Department or Division director of a federal or state agency that is not governed by a board; • A governing board or commission of an organization or association; and • A private system owner/manager that is not governed by a board.

Lateral (including Lower and Upper Lateral) - An underground segment of smaller diameter pipe that transports sewage from a customer’s building or property (residential, commercial, or industrial) to the Enrollee’s main sewer line in a street or easement. Upper and lower lateral boundary definitions are subject to local jurisdictional codes and ordinances, or private system ownership. A lower lateral is the portion of the lateral located between the sanitary sewer system main, and either the property line, sewer clean out, curb line, established utility easement boundary, or other jurisdictional locations. An upper lateral is the portion of the lateral from the property line, sewer clean out, curb line, established utility easement boundary, or other jurisdictional locations, to the building or property.

Legally Responsible Official - An official representative, designated by the Enrollee, with authority to sign and certify submitted information and documents required by the General Order.

Nuisance - California Water Code Section 13050, subdivision (m), defines nuisance as anything which meets all of the following requirements:

Item 15.

Definitions
Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page v • Is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. • Affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. • Occurs during, or as a result of, the treatment or disposal of wastes.

Potential to Discharge, Potential Discharge - Any exiting of sewage from a sanitary sewer system which can reasonably be expected to discharge into a water of the State based on the size of the sewage spill, proximity to a drainage conveyance system, and the nature of the surrounding environment.

Receiving Water - A water of the State that receives a discharge of waste.

Sanitary sewer system - A system that is designed to convey sewage, including but not limited to, pipes, manholes, pump stations, siphons, wet wells, diversion structures and/or other pertinent infrastructure, upstream of a wastewater treatment plant headworks, including:
• Laterals owned and/or operated by the Enrollee;
• Satellite sewer systems; and/or
• Temporary conveyance and storage facilities, including but not limited to temporary piping, vaults, construction trenches, wet wells, impoundments, tanks and diversion structures.

For purpose of the Order, sanitary sewer systems include only systems owned and/or operated by the Enrollee.

Satellite Sewer System - A portion of a sanitary sewer system owned or operated by a different owner than the owner of the downstream wastewater treatment facility ultimately treating the sewage.

Sewer System Management Plan - A living document an Enrollee develops and implements to effectively manage its sanitary sewer system(s) in accordance with the General Order.

Sewage - Sewage and its associated wastewater, is untreated or partially treated domestic, municipal, commercial and/or industrial waste (including sewage sludge), and any mixture of these wastes with inflow or infiltration of stormwater or groundwater, conveyed in a sanitary sewer system.

Spill - A discharge of sewage from any portion of a sanitary sewer system due to a sanitary sewer system overflow, operational failure, and/or infrastructure failure. Exfiltration of sewage is not considered to be a spill under the General Order if the exfiltrated sewage remains in the subsurface and does not reach a surface water of the State.

Spill Reporting System – Online spill reporting system that is hosted, controlled, and maintained by the State Water Board. The web address for this site is http://ciwqs.waterboards.ca.gov. This online database is maintained on a secure site and is controlled by unique usernames and passwords.

Training - In-house or external education and guidance needed that provides the knowledge, skills, and abilities to comply with the General Order.

Untreated or partially treated wastewater – Any volume of waste discharged from the sanitary sewer system upstream of a wastewater treatment plant headworks.

Waste - As defined in Water Code section 13050(d), includes sewage and any and all other waste substances, liquid, solid, gaseous, or radioactive, associated with human habitation, or of human or animal origin, or from any

Item 15.

Definitions
Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page vi producing, manufacturing, or processing operation, including waste placed within containers of whatever nature prior to, and for purposes of, disposal.

Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) – Number which identifies each individual sanitary sewer system enrolled under the General Order. A WDID number is assigned to each enrolled system upon an Enrollee’s approved regulatory coverage.

Waters of the State - Surface waters or groundwater within boundaries of the state as defined in Water Code section 13050(e), in which the State and Regional Water Boards have authority to protect beneficial uses. Waters of the State include, but are not limited to, groundwater aquifers, surface waters, saline waters, natural washes and pools, wetlands, sloughs, and estuaries, regardless of flow or whether water exists during dry conditions. Waters of the State include waters of the United States.

Waters of the United States - Surface waters or waterbodies that are subject to federal jurisdiction in accordance with the Clean Water Act.

Water Quality Objective - The limit or maximum amount of pollutant, waste constituent or characteristic, or parameter level established in statewide water quality control plans and Regional Water Boards’ Basin Plans, for the reasonable protection of beneficial uses of surface waters and groundwater and the prevention of nuisance.

WDR – State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 2022.0103-DWQ, known as the WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS (WDR), which was adopted December 2, 2022 and became effective on June 5, 2023.

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page vii Purpose and Background
In December 2022, the State of California’s Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Order Number WQ 2022-0103-DWQ that updated General WDRs for sanitary sewer systems designed to convey sewage greater than one (1) mile in length. The order became effective on June 5, 2023. This order supersedes the previous Order Number 2006-0003-DWQ and all amendments thereafter (i.e., Order No. WQ 2013-0058-EXEC). The WDR requires that all enrolled agencies develop a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) that describes the activities of the enrollee in managing, operating, and maintaining their sanitary sewer collection system. The purpose of the Order is to prevent sanitary sewer spills and to provide a plan and schedule for measures to be implemented for spill prevention including measures to effectively clean up and report spills. A copy of the reissued 2022 WDR is included in Appendix A.

The reissued WDR includes directives for owners and operators of sanitary sewer systems to demonstrate adequate and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system. Generally, the WDR requires that:

In the event of a spill, all feasible steps are taken to control the released volume and prevent untreated wastewater from entering storm drains, creeks, etc.

If a spill occurs, it must be reported to the SWRCB using California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS), the online reporting system developed by the SWRCB.

An SSMP with all mandatory elements be developed and approved by the governing body that owns or is responsible for the operation of the sanitary sewer system. The SSMP must include provisions to provide proper and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system.

Spills often contain high levels of suspended solids, pathogenic organisms, toxic pollutants, nutrients, oxygendemanding organic compounds, oil and grease and other pollutants. Spills may cause a public nuisance and/or a public health hazard particularly when raw untreated wastewater is discharged to areas with high public exposure, such as streets or surface waters used for drinking, fishing, or body contact recreation. Spills may pollute surface or ground waters, threaten public health, adversely affect aquatic life, and impair the recreational use and aesthetic enjoyment of surface waters.

Sanitary sewer systems experience periodic failures resulting in discharges that may affect waters of the state.

There are many factors (including factors related to geology, design, construction methods and materials, age of the system, population growth, and system operation and maintenance), or excessive infiltration and inflow (I/I) which affect the likelihood of a spill. A proactive approach that requires agencies to ensure a system-wide operation, maintenance, and management plan is in place that will reduce the number and frequency of spills within the state.

This approach will in turn decrease the risk to human health and the environment caused by spills.

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page viii Elements of a SSMP
A Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) is a living planning document that documents ongoing local sewer system management program activities, procedures, and decision-making – at the scale necessary to address the size and complexity of the subject sanitary sewer system(s). This SSMP may incorporate other programs and other plans by reference, to address short-term and long-term system resilience through:
• Proactive planning and decision-making;
• Local government ordinances;
• Updated operations and maintenance activities and procedures; • Implementation of capital improvements;
• Sufficient local budget to support staff resources, contractors, equipment, and training; and • Updated training of staff and contractors.

The Enrollee’s development, update, and implementation of a SSMP addressing the pertinent requirements is an enforceable component of the General Order. As specified in the General Order, consistent with the Water Code and the State Water Board Enforcement Policy, the State Water Board or a Regional Water Board may consider the Enrollee’s efforts in implementing an effective SSMP to prevent, contain, control, and mitigate spills when considering Water Code section 13327 factors to determine necessary enforcement of the General Order.

The eleven (11) required SSMP Elements that must be included in an SSMP are as follows:

1. Sewer System Management Plan Goal and Introduction

2. Organization

3. Legal Authority

4. Operations and Maintenance Program

5. Design and Performance Provisions

6. Spill Emergency Response Plan

7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Plan

8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements

9. Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications

10. Internal Audits

11. Communication Program

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 1 1 SSMP Goal and Introduction
This Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order Number WQ 2022-0103-DWQ. This chapter includes a summary of the regulations that serve as the impetus for the development of this SSMP, update schedule for the Coachella Sanitary District’s (District) SSMP, and a brief overview of the District’s service area and sanitary sewer system.

Requirements:

D.1. SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN GOAL AND INTRODUCTION: The goal of the Sewer System Management Plan (Plan) is to provide a plan and schedule to: (1) properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the Enrollee’s sanitary sewer system(s), (2) reduce and prevent spills, and (3) contain and mitigate spills that do occur. The Plan must include a narrative Introduction section that discusses the following items:

1.1. Regulatory Context: The Plan Introduction section must provide a general description of the local sewer system management program and discuss Plan implementation and updates.

1.2. Sewer System Management Plan Update Schedule: The Plan Introduction section must include a schedule for the Enrollee to update the Plan, including the schedule for conducting internal audits. The schedule must include milestones for incorporation of activities addressing prevention of sewer spills.

1.3. Sewer System Asset Overview: The Plan Introduction section must provide a description of the Enrolleeowned assets and service area, including but not limited to:
• Location, including county(ies);
• Service area boundary;
• Population and community served;
• System size, including total length in miles, length of gravity mainlines, length of pressurized (force) mains, and number of pump stations and siphons;
• Structures diverting stormwater to the sewer system;
• Data management systems;
• Sewer system ownership and operation responsibilities between Enrollee and private entities for upper and lower sewer laterals;
• Estimated number or percent of residential, commercial, and industrial service connections; and • Unique service boundary conditions and challenge(s).

Additionally, the Plan Introduction section must provide reference to the Enrollee’s up-to-date map of its sanitary sewer system, as required in section 4.1 (Updated Map of Sanitary Sewer System) of the General Order’s Attachment D.

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 2

1.1 Regulatory Context
The District has implemented this Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) in accordance with the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) General Order. The previous SSMP that was adopted by the City Council was in 2009, and a new version was written in 2018. In 2023, Element 6 of the SSMP -- the Spill Emergency Response Plan -- was updated to comply with the SWRCB’s revised regulations. The SSMP was audited in 2024, as required by the Board’s guidelines, and the District plans to seek City Council approval for this SSMP Update in 2025.

The WDR requires that the SSMP be updated and approved by the agency’s elected governing body every six (6) years after the date of its last Plan Update due date. In addition, the District is to conduct an internal audit every three (3) years of the SSMP in order to assess the District’s progress towards meeting the goals, objectives and requirements set forth in the SSMP. The due dates for the District’s SSMP and SSMP audits can be found here using the District’s WDID (7SSO10520): https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/sso/lookup/.

The SSMP along with all references in the document, self-audits, and the adoption documents approved by City Council will be kept on file at District offices, the District’s website and an entry will be made in the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) database when SSMP updates and audits are completed.

The District has a goal of effectively implementing the SSMP to ensure cleaning, CCTV inspection, condition assessment, and rehabilitation are occurring regularly to ensure their sewer system is properly maintained.

1.2 Sewer System Management Plan Update Schedule
Table 1-1 shows important milestones and dates for the District to comply with the General Order in order to incorporate activities that shall prevent sewer spills.

Table 1-1: SSMP Update Schedule
Milestones Frequency Due DATES
Submit Annual Report Annually April 1st annually
Update System Mapping Monthly 9/1/2025, 10/1/2025, etc.

System Cleaning Entire system every five (5) to seven
(7) years (or ~14%-20% a year)
1/1/2032 for entire system
CCTV Inspections Entire system every five (5) to seven
(7) years (or ~14%-20% a year)
1/1/2032 for entire system
SSMP Focused Training Annually 6/1/2026
Update Equipment Inventory Monthly 9/1/2025, 10/1/2025, etc.

Evaluate Design Criteria and
Construction Standards and
Specifications
3 years 8/2/2027 (next audit)
Evaluate Spill Emergency Response
Plan
3 years 8/2/2027 (next audit)
Evaluate Sewer Pipe Blockage
Control Program
3 years 8/2/2027 (next audit)
CIP Development Ongoing Ongoing
Review SSMP and Update Change
Log
Annually 8/2/2026
SSMP Audit 3 years 8/2/2027
Evaluate Communication Program 3 years 8/2/2027 (next audit)

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 3 Table 1-1: SSMP Update Schedule
Milestones Frequency Due DATES
SSMP Update 6 years 8/2/2031

1.3 Sewer System Asset Overview
The Coachella Sanitary District (District) is located in Riverside County in Southern California. The District is accessible via Interstate 10 and State Highway 86. The District’s area is approximately 32 square miles. The District’s population is approximately 46,000.

The Coachella Sanitary District was originally established as a special district prior to the 1960’s, governed by its own independent board. In 1969, the board was dissolved when the District became a subsidiary of the City of Coachella. Since then, the City of Coachella has served as the District’s governing body. The District owns and operates the sanitary sewer collection system within its designated service area, which includes portions of the unincorporated areas of Riverside County. It provides sewer service to many businesses and residents throughout the region. The Coachella Sanitary District’s boundary, along with the City of Coachella’s boundary, can be seen in the map provided in Appendix B. Table 1-2 documents the District’s sewer system assets, and Table 1-3 documents the number of service connections which connect into the District’s sewer system. General maintenance of the sanitary sewer collection system is performed by District staff.

The District maintains up-to-date mapping of its sanitary sewer system. These maps show gravity line segments and manholes, pumping facilities, and pressure pipes. Applicable stormwater conveyance facilities within the sewer system service area boundaries are not currently shown in these maps. The District plans on reaching out to the City’s Engineering Department to obtain storm drain GIS data and mapping files. Once acquired, these resources will be added to the shared folder within the Sanitary/Utilities Department. Additional information on these maps is included in section 4.1 (Updated Map of Sanitary Sewer System).

Table 1-2: Sewer System Assets
District Assets Value
Total Length 107 miles
Length of Gravity Mainlines 106 miles
Length of Pressure Force Mains 1 mile
Number of Lift Stations 2
Number of Siphons 1
Structures Diverting Stormwater to the Sewer System NONE Data Management Systems Fieldforce / iWorQ
Sewer System Ownership and Operation
Responsibilities between Enrollee and Private Entities
for Upper and Lower Sewer Laterals
District is responsible for District-owned laterals.

Property owner is responsible for the lateral up to the connection to the sewer main.

Estimated Number or Percent of Residential,
Commercial, and Industrial Service Connections
See Table 1-3
Unique Service Boundary Conditions and Challenge(s) District Limits

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 4 Table 1-3: Number of Service Connections
Customer Class Service Connections
Single Family Residential 7,432
Multi-Family Residential 411
Mobile Home Park 36
Commercial/Institutional 396
Total Active Connections 8,275

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 5 2 Organization
This chapter describes the District’s organizational staffing responsible and integral for implementing the local Sewer System Management Plan.

Requirements:

D.2. ORGANIZATION: The Plan must identify organizational staffing responsible and integral for implementing the local Sewer System Management Plan through an organization chart or similar narrative documentation that includes:
• The name of the Legally Responsible Official as required in section 5.1 (Designation of a Legally Responsible Official) of the General Order;
• The position titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses for management, administrative, and maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific Sewer System Management Plan elements;
• Organizational lines of authority; and
• Chain of communication for reporting spills from receipt of complaint or other information, including the person responsible for reporting spills to the State and Regional Water Boards and other agencies, as applicable. (For example, county health officer, county environmental health agency, and State Office of Emergency Services.)

2.1 Name of Legally Responsible Official
The District’s Utilities Director, which is Castulo R. Estrada, serves as one of the District’s Legally Responsible Official (LRO) and oversees the management of the District’s sanitary sewer system. His contact information is (760) 501-8100 (office) and [email protected]. The other certified LRO is Robert Huerta, the District’s Sanitary Superintendent. His contact information is (760) 391-5008 (office) and [email protected].

Currently, both LROs are authorized to certify electronic spill reports submitted to the SWRCB.

The staff in the Sanitation Division is responsible for implementing and maintaining all elements of this SSMP.

2.2 Department Organization
The organizational lines of authority for the District’s Sanitation Division are indicated in Figure 2-1.

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 6 Figure 2-1: Organizational Chart

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 7

2.3 Roles and Responsibilities
The position titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses for management, administrative, and maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific Sewer System Management Plan elements are indicated in Table 2-1. The responsibilities for these roles are detailed in Table 2-2. The positions that implement the SSMP are detailed in Table 2-3.

Table 2-1: Key Staff Roles
Role Name Phone Number Email Address
Utilities Director Castulo R. Estrada (760) 501-8100 [email protected] Sanitary Superintendent Robert Huerta (760) 391-5008 [email protected] Chief Treatment Collections
System Operator
Edgar Beltran (760) 501-8103 [email protected]
Assistant Engineer Itzel Barroso (760) 501-8100 [email protected] Environmental Special
Programs Manager
Abraham Vega (760) 501-8100 [email protected]
Public Information Officer Risseth Lora (760) 398-3502 [email protected] City Engineer & Public Works
Director
Andrew Simmons (760) 398-3502 [email protected]
City Manager Bill Pattison (760) 398-3502 [email protected] Table 2-2: Department Roles & Responsibilities
Role Responsibilities
Utilities Director Plans, organizes, oversees, coordinates, and manages the staff and operations of the District’s Facilities Maintenance and Operations Division; participates in the development of policies and strategies for division operations; manages the effective use of division resources to improve organizational productivity and customer service.

Sanitary Superintendent Under general direction, plans, schedules, assigns, reviews and supervises the work of staff performing the collection and transport of wastewater to District wastewater treatment plants; oversees installation, maintenance and repair of the overall collection system; coordinates assigned services and operations with those of other District divisions and outside agencies; provides complex staff assistance to management staff in areas of expertise; and performs related work as required.

Chief Treatment Collections System
Operator
Under direction, plans, schedules, assigns, evaluates, and serves as a first line working supervisor over an assigned crew responsible for performing collection systems operations and maintenance; works closely with supervisory and/or management staff in planning, organizing and establishing work priorities; performs the more complex work assigned to the crew; and performs related work as required.

Assistant Engineer Under general supervision, performs professional civil or electrical engineering work related to the design and construction of District infrastructure and facilities; prepares, and reviews designs, plans, and specifications for District projects; serves in a project lead or manager capacity on assigned projects to ensure compliance with District

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 8 Table 2-2: Department Roles & Responsibilities
Role Responsibilities
contracted services, specifications and quality; coordinates projects with contractors, consultants, and other stakeholders; and performs related work as required.

Environmental Special Programs
Manager
Under general direction, plans, schedules, assigns, reviews and supervises the work of staff performing water quality, environmental, and/or regulatory compliance duties within the District’s Environmental and/or Water Quality divisions; plans, and coordinates comprehensive environmental, regulatory compliance and water quality data collection, monitoring and reporting programs to ensure the District maintains compliance with all environmental and regulatory requirements; coordinates assigned services and operations with those of other District divisions and outside agencies; provides complex staff assistance to management staff in areas of expertise; and performs related work as required.

Public Information Officer Under general direction, plans, organizes, oversees, coordinates, and manages the staff and operations of the Communications Division, including the Communications and Education Program; participates in representing the District on public and media relations; serves as chief spokesperson for the District; participates in the development of policies and strategies for division operations; manages the effective use of division resources to improve organizational productivity and customer service; provides complex and responsible support to the Director of Service and Communication in areas of expertise; and performs related work as required.

City Manager Under policy direction, plans, organizes, and provides administrative direction and oversight for all City functions and activities; provides policy guidance and program evaluation to the City Council, and management staff; encourages and facilitates provision of services to City residents and businesses; fosters cooperative working relationships with intergovernmental and regulatory agencies and various public and private groups; pursues appropriate avenues of economic and community development; and performs related work as required.

Table 2-3: Positions that Implement the District’s SSMP SSMP Element [WDR Section No.] Position(s)
Legally Responsible Official (LRO) or
Duly Authorized Representative
[Section 5.1]
Utilities Director & Sanitary Superintendent
Goals
[SSSWDR D.1]
Utilities Director & Sanitary Superintendent
Organization
[SSSWDR D.2]
Utilities Director & Sanitary Superintendent
Legal Authority
[SSSWDR D.3]
City Council, City Manager, Utilities Director, and Sanitary Superintendent
Operation and Maintenance Program
[SSSWDR D.4]
Utilities Director, Sanitary Superintendent & Chief Treatment Collections Systems Operator
Design and Performance Provisions
[SSSWDR D.5]
Utilities Director, City Engineer, and Assistant Engineer (Utilities), Sanitary Superintendent

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 9 Table 2-3: Positions that Implement the District’s SSMP SSMP Element [WDR Section No.] Position(s)
Spill Emergency Response Program
[SSSWDR D.6]
Sanitary Superintendent, Chief Treatment Collections System Operator, Utilities Director, Public Information Officer Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program
[SSSWDR D.7]
Sanitary Superintendent, Utilities Director, Environmental Special Programs Manager
System Evaluation, Capacity,
Assurance and Capital Improvements
[SSSWDR D.8]
Utilities Director, City Engineer, Sanitary Superintendent, Assistant Engineer (Utilities)
Monitoring, Measurement, and
Program Modifications
[SSSWDR D.9]
Utilities Director, Sanitary Superintendent, Assistant Engineer (Utilities)
SSMP Internal Audits
[SSSWDR D.10]
Utilities Director, Sanitary Superintendent
Communication Program
[SSSWDR D.11]
City Council, City Manager, Utilities Director, and Public Information Officer
Funding
[SSSWDR D.8.4]
City Council, City Manager, Utilities Director

2.4 Chain of Communication
The Order requires the chain of communication for reporting spills from receipt of complaint or other information, including the person responsible for reporting spills to the State and Regional Water Boards and other agencies, as applicable. Table 2-4 lists contact phone numbers for the parties included in the chain of communication.

Table 2-4: Contact Numbers for Chain of Communication
Contact Telephone Number
City of Coachella Corporate Yard 760.501.8100
Coachella Sanitary District 760.391.5008
Police Department 760.863.8990
Fire Department 760.398.8895
City of Coachella – Utilities Water Division 760.578.7098 City of Coachella – Street Department 442.256.0795

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 10 3 Legal Authority
This chapter describes the legal authority required to implement the SSMP plans and procedures.

Requirements:

D.3. LEGAL AUTHORITY: The Plan must include copies or an electronic link to the Enrollee’s current sewer system use ordinances, service agreements and/or other legally binding procedures to demonstrate the Enrollee possesses the necessary legal authority to:
• Prevent illicit discharges into its sanitary sewer system from inflow and infiltration (I&I); unauthorized stormwater; chemical dumping; unauthorized debris; roots; fats, oils, and grease; and trash, including rags and other debris that may cause blockages;
• Collaborate with storm sewer agencies to coordinate emergency spill responses, ensure access to storm sewer systems during spill events, and prevent unintentional cross connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to storm sewer infrastructure;
• Require that sewer system components and connections be properly designed and constructed; • Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, and/or repairs for portions of the service lateral owned and/or operated by the Enrollee;
• Enforce any violation of its sewer ordinances, service agreements, or other legally binding procedures; and • Obtain easement accessibility agreements for locations requiring sewer system operations and maintenance, as applicable.

3.1 Compliance Documents
Supporting information for Element 3 is included in Appendices C, D, and E. These appendices include the following documents:

1. Chapter 13.01 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the City Municipal Code (Appendix C)

2. Chapter 13.02 (Wastewater Treatment) of the City Municipal Code (Appendix D)

3. Chapter 13.16 (Water Quality Control) of the City Municipal Code (Appendix E)

3.1.1 Municipal Code
The legal authority required for the SSMP by the SWRCB is contained within the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter

13.01 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) and Chapter 13.02 (Wastewater Treatment) are dedicated to the sewer system.
(https://library.municode.com/ca/coachella/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT13PUSE)

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 11

3.2 Compliance Summary
The District’s legal authority to operate and maintain its sanitary sewer collection system is within the City Municipal Code. The WDR requires that the District have the legal authority in the areas shown in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1: WDR Requirements
Legal Authority Order Requirements Applicable Sections of the District Municipal Code a. Prevent illicit discharges into its sanitary sewer
system from inflow and infiltration
(I&I); unauthorized stormwater; chemical
dumping; unauthorized debris; roots; fats,
oils, and grease; and trash, including rags and
other debris that may cause
blockages
• Section 13.02.402 applies to the protocol for
industrial waste discharges into the sewer
• Sections 13.02.300 & .340 restricts the
discharge of pollutants and harmful wastes
• Sections 13.01.006 & 13.02.300 applies to
illicit discharge of rainwater, storm water,
ground water, etc. into sewer and applies to
illegal connections to the District’s sewer
system
• Section 13.02.384 applies to food processing
facilities and proper disposal of grease and
waste
• Section 13.02.384 applies to vehicle serving
facilities and proper disposal of oil and grease
using an interceptor
b. Collaborate with storm sewer agencies to
coordinate emergency spill responses,
ensure access to storm sewer systems during
spill events, and prevent unintentional cross
connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to
storm sewer infrastructure
• Section 13.16.142 enforces maintenance of
private residential storm drainage systems.
• Sections 13.16.043 & .044 prohibits
construction of storm water connections
without an approved construction permit and
approved construction plan.
• Section 13.16.142 gives the authority to the
public works director to inspect the premises of
any discharger at any reasonable time.
c. Require that sewer system components and
connections be properly designed and
constructed
• Sections 13.01.004, .257 & .258 applies to
general sewer system design and construction
d. Ensure access for maintenance, inspection,
and/or repairs for portions of the service lateral
owned and/or operated by the Enrollee
• Section 13.02.070 allows for access, sampling,
and inspection of any property connected to the
public sewer main
e. Enforce any violation of its sewer ordinances,
service agreements, or other legally binding
procedures
• Sections 13.02.700 thru .775 allows for
enforcement of violations of discharge
regulations
f. Obtain easement accessibility agreements for
locations requiring sewer system
operations and maintenance, as applicable
• Section 13.02.070 grants access to the District
to enter all properties from which wastes or
wastewaters are capable of being discharged
into a public sewer main

Item 15.

Coachella Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Page 12

3.2.1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges
All measures prohibiting illicit discharges are included in Sections 13.01 & 13.02 of the District’s Municipal Code.

The specific purpose of the chapter is to prevent the discharge of any pollutant into the sewers that would obstruct or damage the collection system, interfere with treatment, or threaten harm to human health or the environment. • Stormwater and I/I - Section 13.01.006 & 13.02.300 applies to illicit discharge of rainwater, storm water, ground water, etc. into sewer and applies to illegal connections to the District’s sewer system • Industrial Waste – Section 13.02.402 applies to the protocol for industrial waste discharges into the sewer.
• Chemical Dumping – Section 13.02.300 & .340 restricts the discharge of pollutants and harmful wastes. • Unauthorized Debris; Roots; Fats, Oils, and Grease; and Trash - Section 13.02.384 applies to food processing facilities and proper disposal of grease and waste.

The District currently does not have an ordinance that specifically prohibits illicit discharges such as roots, fats, oils, rags, and other debris that may cause blockages in the sewer system. However, the District plans to update its ordinance to address and include these types of discharges.

3.2.2 Storm Water Agency Collaboration
The District’s sewer staff is separate from the City’s Public Works Department, who is responsible for the maintenance of the stormwater conveyance system. The sewer staff does have communication with the Public Works staff in the event of a spill. Communication and training with staff allow both agencies to know their part in responding to spills and recognizing areas at risk, develop strategies in containing and preventing spills, and reduce risks of cross contamination.

Installation of sewer and storm water facilities are coordinated to prevent unintentional cross connections. To ensure that cross-connections between the District’s sanitary sewer and the City’s storm drain systems do not occur, the District can request access to the records of the alignments of the storm system.

No connections to either system are permitted without prior approval from both the Utilities Department and the Engineering Department. Improvement Plans must be submitted for review, and permits are issued only after the plans have been approved. All plans must comply with the City’s and the Utilities Department’s Design Guidelines.

Once approved, all system connections are inspected by Engineering Department staff to ensure they are constructed in accordance with established standards.

3.2.3 Proper Design and Construction of Sewers and Connections Regulations pertaining to the design, construction, and inspection of private sewer systems, building sewers, and connections are included in Chapter 13 of the District’s Municipal Code.

Permit Required - A permit is required prior to construction of any private sewage disposal system. A permit is also required prior to constructing a building or lateral sewer or connecting to a public sewer. The permit application may include review of plans and specifications by the District. • Section 13.01.004, .257 & .258 applies to general sewer system design and construction