I
Colma Police Department
Colma PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/20, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Colma Police Department
Military Equipment -
15 Equipment Type: Less Lethal Shotguns and Kinetic Energy Munitions - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(14)
Quantity Owned/Sought: 39 owned Lifespan: Approximately 15 years Equipment Capabilities: The Remington 870 Police Magnum is capable of firing 12-gauge shotgun ammunition. These shotguns were previously in service at the Daly City Police Department as lethal force options but were converted into less-lethal shotguns using Hogue 870 conversion kits. All Remington 870 shotguns currently owned by the Department are less-lethal shotguns, 37 of which are used to deploy bean bag rounds only. The bean bag shotgun is capable of firing 12-gauge kinetic energy munitions, which are less-lethal projectiles. Specifically, the kinetic energy munitions used in these shotguns are drag stabilized bean bags that are propelled out of a 12-gauge cartridge.
Two of the less-lethal shotguns have been equipped with a launching apparatus on the muzzle that enables certain less-lethal chemical agents to be deployed from the shotgun, described elsewhere under “Tear Gas and Chemical Agents.” Manufacturer Product Description: The Remington Model 870 Police Magnum is a pump- action 12-gauge shotgun. Featuring an ultra-durable parkerized matte finish, synthetic stocks, 18-inch barrel with front sight and a 4-round magazine.
Hogue 870 Conversion Kit: Hogue rubber grips are molded from durable synthetic rubber that is neither spongy nor tacky yet provides a soft recoil absorbing feel without affecting accuracy. This modern rubber requires a completely different molding process than ordinary neoprene, resulting in a superior grip. The flexibility of our materials and molding process has allowed us to produce rubber grips with features that outperform all other makes.
Safariland Drag Stabilized Bean Bag: The Drag Stabilized™ 12-Gauge Round is a translucent 12-Gauge shell loaded with a 40-Gram tear shaped bag made from a cotton and ballistic material blend and filled with #9 shot. This design utilizes four stabilizing tails and utilizes smokeless powder as the propellant. The 12-Gauge Drag Stabilized Round has secured its place as the Law Enforcement Communities’ number one choice for specialty impact munitions. This round has a velocity of 270 fps with a maximum effective range of 75 feet.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: The bean bag shotguns and kinetic energy munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal force response option.
Fiscal Impacts: The initial cost of the Remington 870 Police Magnum shotguns were approximately $15,600. The cost to convert them to less-lethal bean bag shotguns was approximately $3,120. Maintenance is conducted by trained and authorized Departmental staff. The ongoing costs for munitions will vary.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable Local, State, and Federal laws governing police use of force. All applicable Daly City Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.
Training Required: Officers must complete a Department Less-lethal Shotgun course as well as regular training and qualifications as required by law and policy. Launchable chemical agent grenades for the less-lethal shotguns outfitted with the appropriate launching apparatus are only authorized for use by Department SWAT team members and Crowd Control Unit personnel after completion of Department training by CA POST certified Chemical Agent Instructors.
Other Notes: The Daly City Police Department presently employs four trained and qualified Chemical Agent Instructors who are authorized to train SWAT Team members and Crowd Control Unit personnel on the use of chemical agent munitions with the less lethal shotgun.
I
Colma Police Department
Colma PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/20, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Colma Police Department
Military Equipment -
16 Equipment Type: “Tear Gas” and Chemical Agents - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(12) Quantity Owned/Sought: 154 owned Lifespan: Varies on weather and storage conditions
Equipment Capabilities: Chemical agents, sometimes referred to as “tear gas” or riot control agents, are less-lethal chemical compounds that temporarily induce discomfort to an individual in the form of one or more of the following: Irritation to the skin, eyes, mouth, throat, and lungs. The goal of which is to gain compliance, dispersal, or direct the movement of one or more individuals.
The Daly City Police Department owns multiple types of chemical agents in various forms, totaling 154 individual units at present. The units are expendable items; therefore, the quantities will vary. Each chemical agent type has different capabilities. The types and manufacturers are as follows:
Defense Technologies Spede-Heat CS gas grenade, 81.2g, 20-40 second burn time Defense Technologies Flameless Tri-Chamber CS gas grenade, 20.0g, 20-30 second burn time
Combined Tactical Systems Indoor Baffled CS gas grenade, 25.0g, 20-40 second burn time, launchable through outfitted less-lethal shotgun apparatus, requires specific blank 12 gauge launching cartridge manufactured by Combined Tactical Systems
Defense Technologies 40mm Liquid Ferret Round, liquid CS projectile dispersed upon impact, 8.0g, launchable though 40mm launcher
Defense Technologies Pocket Tactical CS gas grenade, 20.0g, 20-40 second burn time
Defense Technologies Maximum Smoke HC (Hexachloroethane) grenade, smoke screen, 1 ½ -2 minute burn time
Defense Technologies Triple-Chaser, CS gas canister, 90.7g, 20-30 second burn time
Manufacturer Product Description:
Defense Tech Spede-Heat CS Grenade: The Spede-Heat™ CS Grenade is a high volume, continuous burn it expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds. The payload is discharged through four gas ports on top of the canister, three on the side and one on the bottom. This launchable grenade is 6.12 in. by 2.62 in. and holds approximately 2.9 oz. of active agent.
Defense Tech Flameless Tri-Chamber CS Grenade: The design of the Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Grenade allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The grenade is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This grenade will deliver approximately .70 oz. of agent during its 20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used in crowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects.
The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals’ effectiveness via heat and
I
Colma Police Department
Colma PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/20, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Colma Police Department
Military Equipment -
17 vaporization, while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure. The Tri- Chamber Flameless Grenade is NOT to be launched utilizing a launching cup.
Combined Tactical Systems Indoor Baffled CS Grenade: Pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a maximum amount of irritant smoke throughout multiple rooms with minimal risk of fire.
Combined Tactical Systems 12 gauge Launching Cartridge: The Model 2600 Launching Cartridge is a 12-gauge cartridge much shorter than standard full-sized 12-gauge cartridges.
Therefore, to prevent weapon malfunctions, each cartridge must be manually loaded into the chamber for each shot. Effective range is dependent on the launching cup, launcher, and weight of munitions being launched. The baseline for performance of a Model 2600 Launching Cartridge is that it will launch a Model 9230 CS Grenade a minimum of 100 yards (91M), with cylinder bore and 18" bbl.
Defense Technologies 40mm Liquid Ferret Round: The Ferret® 40mm Round is non-burning and suitable for indoor use. Used primarily by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. In a tactical deployment situation, the 40mm Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects.
Defense Technologies Pocket Tactical CS Gas Grenade: The Pocket Tactical CS Grenade is small, and lightweight. The 0.9 oz. of active agent will burn approximately 20-40 seconds. At
4.75 in. by 1.4 inches in size, it easily fits in most tactical pouches. This is a launchable grenade; however, it is normally used as a signaling or covering device. Though this device is slightly over four inches in length, it produces a smoke cloud so fast it appears to be an enveloping screen produced by a full-size tactical grenade.
Defense Technologies Maximum Smoke HC Grenade: The Maximum Smoke Grenade is designed specifically for outdoor use in crowd control situations with a high-volume continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 30-40 seconds through four gas ports located on the top of the canister. This grenade can be used to conceal tactical movement or to route a crowd. The volume of smoke and agent is vast and obtrusive. This launchable colored smoke grenade is 6.0 in. by 2.35 in. and holds approximately 2.9 oz. of active agent.
Defense Technologies Triple-Chaser CS Gas Canister: The Triple-Chaser® CS consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing increased area coverage in a short period of time. This grenade can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system. The grenade is 6.5 in. by 2.7 in. and holds an approximately 3.2 oz. of active agent payload. It has an approximate burn time of 20-30 seconds.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: Chemical agents are intended for use as a less-lethal force response option. They can be deployed by trained Department personnel for riot control purposes, during tactical operations involving barricaded suspects, or other situations where lesser means are reasonably believed to be ineffective or involve substantial more risk to Department personnel.
Fiscal Impacts: The ongoing cost of chemical agents will vary. The cost of the Department’s present inventory of chemical agents was approximately $8,360. There are no associated
Colma Police Department
Colma PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/20, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Colma Police Department
Military Equipment -
18 maintenance costs.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable Local, State, and Federal laws governing police use of force. All applicable Daly City Police Department Policies on Use of Force.
Training Required: Officers must be assigned to the Department SWAT Team or Crowd Control Unit, having completed the required training course(s) associated with that position.
SWAT Team officers or Crowd Control Unit officers will complete Department chemical agents training from a certified Department Chemical Agents Instructor as well as attend regular training and qualifications as required by law and policy.
Other Notes: The Daly City Police Department presently employs four trained and qualified Chemical Agent Instructors who are authorized to train SWAT Team members and Crowd Control Unit personnel on the use of chemical agents.
Equipment Type: “Flashbang Grenades” - CA Gov’t Code §7070(c)(12) Quantity Owned/Sought: 47 owned Lifespan: Varies on weather and storage conditions
Equipment Capabilities: The flashbang, sometimes referred to as “stun grenade,” is a diversionary device that delivers a bright flash and loud explosive-type noise when deployed.
This is a non-lethal handheld grenade that does not fragment or produce any shrapnel.
Manufacturer Product Description: Defense Technologies Low Roll 4-gram Distraction Device: The reloadable distraction device unit incorporates a model 7007 type fuse with hex design gun steel body. This is a compact version of the 8933 Low Roll® body Distraction Device and is the newest version of the first reusable non-bursting canister that limits movement and rolling once deployed. The compact Distraction Device fits safely in your hand and packs all the power of the full-size Distraction Device. The 4-Gram Distraction Device® Reload produces a reduced light, and sound output ideal for when the full effects of the 12- gram charge are not desirable.
Purpose/Authorized Uses: Diversionary devices are intended for use as a distraction option used during high-risk entries into a dwelling or similar structure by SWAT operators. They can be deployed by trained Department SWAT operators when authorized by the SWAT Commander or in the event of exigent circumstances.
Fiscal Impacts: The ongoing cost of diversionary devices will vary. The cost of the Department’s present inventory of diversionary devices was approximately $2,820.
Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable Local, State, and Federal laws governing police use of force. All applicable Daly City Police Department Policies on Use of Force.
Training Required: Officers must be assigned to the Department SWAT Team, having completed a CA POST Basic SWAT Course. SWAT Team officers participate in regular Department SWAT training incorporating the use of the diversionary devices into trainings.
Other Notes: None.
I
AGENDA ITEM 8.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Michelle Estabillo , City Clerk
VIA: Daniel Barros, City Manager
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, August 26, 2026
SUBJECT: League of California Cities 2026 Annual Conference Voting Delegate
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council make the following motion:
MOTION TO APPOINT A VOTING DELEGATE AND UP TO TWO ALTERNATES TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2026 ANNUAL CONFERENCE
COUNCIL ADOPTED VALUES
Participating in the Annual Business meeting furthers the Council’s adopted values of Responsibility and Vision because providing input on important local, regional and state policy issues protects the Town’s long-term financial stability and other interests.
BACKGROUND
The League of California Cities is an association of cities within the state of California, founded in 1898. Most of the state's 482 cities, including Colma, are represented in the League. The League publishes Western City, a monthly magazine, and holds an annual conference and exposition. The League advocates for cities at the state capitol on a multitude of topics.
The Annual Conference is the League’s largest and most comprehensive educational event.
General sessions feature premiere keynote speakers, while breakout sessions allow city staff and elected officials to explore topics that fit their specific needs and areas of interest.
ANALYSIS
During the annual conference, the League conducts its annual business meeting where the membership considers and acts on resolutions that establish League policy. Each member city’s city council is allowed to designate a city official to serve as the voting delegate to participate and cast votes at the business meeting along with up to two voting alternates in the case of the voting delegate’s absence. This year, the Annual Conference is scheduled for September 23-25, 2026 and will take place in Anaheim, California. Voting delegates and alternates must be submitted to the League no later than Tuesday, September 1, 2026. Once Council has designated a delegate and alternate by motion, the City Clerk will complete and submit the Voting Delegate Form as directed
AGENDA ITEM 8.
in the 2026 Voting Delegate Information Packet.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this action. Attendance at various conferences is budgeted annually.
ENVIRONMENTAL
This is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378, as it is an administrative activity that will not result in physical change to the environment.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternative actions.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends the Council, by motion, appoint a Voting Delegate and up to two alternates for the League Conference.
ATTACHMENTS
A. 2026 Voting Delegate Information Packet
B. 2026 Cal Cities Resolution Packet
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, May 13, 2026
TO: Mayo
rs, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers
RE: DESIGN
ATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Sept. 23-25, 2026 Anaheim Convention Center
Every y
ear, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.
Taking
place on Friday, Sept. 25, 2026 the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.
To cast a v
ote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.
Action b
y Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.
Followi
ng council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.
Submi
tting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.
Conferen
ce Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration opens June 2.
For a ci
ty to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and Council Action Advised by September 1, 2026
ATTACHMENT A
alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.
Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.
Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.
Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Anaheim Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Sept. 23, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Sept. 24, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Sept. 25, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.
The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.
Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.
Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Tuesday, Sept. 1. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].
Attachments:
• Gener
al Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines
1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.
2. Designating
a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.
3. Registering
with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.
4. Signing Initi
ated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.
5. Voting. T
o cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.
6. Voting Area at
General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
7. Resolving Disputes.
In case of dispute, the credentials committee will
determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.
Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.
How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.
The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.
The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.
Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.
Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.
Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.
Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.
The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.
Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.
Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.
During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.
Cal Cities policy
development is a member-
informed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.
For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved
1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.
General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.
2 During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f).
2025-2026
CAL CITIES OFFICERS
President
Gabe Quinto
Mayor
El Cerrito
First Vice President
Teresa Acosta
Council Member
Carlsbad
Second Vice President
David Cohen
Council Member
San Jose
Immediate Past President
Lynne B. Kennedy
Mayor Pro Tem,
Rancho Cucamonga
Executive Director
and CEO
Carolyn M. Coleman
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org August 10, 2026
TO: Cal Ci
ties Members
RE: Cal Ci
ties 2026 Resolution Packet
Sixt
y days before the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Cal Cities members may submit resolutions on issues of importance to cities. This year, Cal Cities received one resolution by the July 25 deadline.
The at
tached packet contains the proposed resolution, background information, supporting letters from cities and city officials, and an analysis of the resolution by Cal Cities. The packet includes detailed information on the resolution process and the next steps for the resolution.
We e
ncourage each city council to consider the resolution and determine a position so your voting delegate can represent your city’s position on the resolution.
Voti
ng Delegates: City councils must appoint a voting delegate to vote during the General Assembly. Each city may also appoint up to two alternate delegates. If your city has not already done so, please appoint your voting delegate by Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. The voting delegate packet contains more information.
The 2026 G
eneral Assembly will be held Friday, Sept. 25, at 8:30 a.m. in the Anaheim Convention Center during the Annual Conference and Expo.
For q
uestions about resolutions, voting delegates, or the General Assembly, please contact Zach Seals.
ATTACHMENT B
2026
Resolution
Packet
2026 Resolution Packet
Information on 2026 Resolutions Process
Consideration by Policy Committee (pre-conference)
Per the Cal Cities bylaws, Cal Cities President Gabe Quinto has referred the submitted resolution to the Housing, Community, and Economic Development Committee. The committee will meet on Thursday, Sept. 17, at 10 a.m. via Zoom to
review the resolution and make a recommendation that will be sent to the Resolutions Committee. A public comment period will be held during the meeting. Register for the meeting here.
A list of recommendations the policy committee may make during its meeting is on page two of this packet.
Consideration by Resolutions Committee (during conference) On Thursday, Sept. 24, at 1:00 p.m. the Resolutions Committee will meet to review the resolution and the recommendation of the policy committee.
The Resolutions Committee consist of one representative from each of Cal Cities caucuses, departments, divisions, and policy committees, as well as up to ten additional appointments made by the Cal Cities President. A public comment period will be held during the meeting. Refer to the onsite conference program for the location.
A list of recommendations the Resolutions Committee may make during its meeting is on page two of this packet.
Consideration by the General Assembly (during conference) The General Assembly will convene on Friday, Sept. 25, at 8:30 a.m. to consider any resolutions the Resolutions Committee has forwarded. To vote during the General Assembly, vo ting delegates must have checked in at the voting delegate booth.
Conference attendees will receive materials for the General Assembly on the evening of Thursday, Sept. 24. For more information on voting and discussion procedures during the General Assembly, see page three of this packet.
Petitioned Resolutions (during conference)
The petitioned resolution is an alternate method to introduce policy proposals during the annual conference. To initiate a petitioned resolution, voting delegates from 10% of member cities must sign the petition. The resolution and signatures are due at least 24 hours before the beginning of the General Assembly. Voting delegates who have checked in at the voting delegate booth can receive more information on petitioned resolutions at the booth onsite. 1
2026 Resolution Packet
Policy Committee and Resolutions Committee Actions
The s
ubmitted resolution will be heard by the policy committee to which it was assigned, and the Resolutions Committee. The table below shows what recommendations these bodies may make on the resolution.
Policy Committee Actions Resolutions Committee Actions
Approve Approve
Disapprove* Disapprove*
No Action No Action
Amend and approve Amend and approve
Refer to appropriate policy committee
for further study*
Approve as amended
Refer as amended to appropriate
policy committee for further study*
Refer to appropriate policy committee
for further study*
Refer as amended to appropriate
policy committee for further study*
Approve with additional
amendment(s)
Additional amendments and refer to
appropriate policy committee for
further study*
*If
a resolution is disapproved or referred for further study by all policy committees to which it is assigned and the Resolutions Committee, it will not proceed to the General Assembly. 2
2026 Resolution Packet
General Assembly Voting and Discussion Procedures
Discussion Procedures:
Discussion procedures during the General Assembly are guided by two calendars:
the Consent Calendar and the Regular Calendar. As seen below, resolutions are calendared by the recommendations they receive from policy committees and the Resolutions Committee.
For General Resolutions:
Policy Committee
Recommendation
Resolutions Committee
Recommendation Calendar
Approve Approve Consent Calendar
Approve Disapprove or refer Regular Calendar
Disapprove or refer Approve Regular Calendar
Disapprove or refer Disapprove or refer Does not proceed to General Assembly
For Petitioned Resolutions:
Policy Committee
Recommendation Resolutions Committee Action Calendar
N/A
Approve Regular Calendar
Disapprove or Refer Regular Calendar
Disqualified Does not proceed to General
Assembly
Items on the Consent Calendar will be presented as one motion during the General Assembly from the Resolutions Committee chair. Unless an item on the Consent Calendar is set aside by the majority of the General Assembly, a vote will be taken on the whole calendar. If an item is set aside, it will be opened for discussion, followed by a vote.
Items on the Regular Calendar will be presented individually by the Resolutions Committee chair. After a recommendation is presented by the Resolutions Committee chair, the resolution will be opened for discussion by the General Assembly. A vote will take place following discussion.
Voting Procedures:
Per Cal Cities Bylaws Article XII, Sec. 2, all votes will be conducted by voice vote first. If the presiding official cannot determine the outcome, a vote will be taken by an alternative method, typically a raise of voting cards by voting delegates. A roll call vote may be called for by delegates of ten percent or more of the General Assembly.
3
2026 Resolution Packet
2026 Resolution
1. Resolution No. 1 submitted by City of Murrieta
• Letters of concurrence submitted by:
i. City of Banning;
ii. City of Calimesa;
iii. City of Canyon Lake;
iv. City of Moreno Valley;
v. City of Norco;
vi. City of Torrance;
vii. Crystal Ruiz, Mayor, City of San Jacinto;
viii. Jessica Alexander, Mayor, City of Temecula
• Referred to Housing, Community, and Economic Development Committee
• Policy Committee Recommendation:
• Resolutions Committee Recommendation:
4
2026 Resolution Packet
Res
olution No. 1
Submitted by City of Murietta
5
2026 Resolution Packet
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
CALLING FOR A WORKING GROUP TO CONSIDER A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT OR OTHER FORM OF INITIATIVE TO ENSURE FINAL LOCAL AUTHORITY OVER
HOUSING AND LAND USE DECISIONS
Source: City of Murrieta
Concurrence of five or more cities/city officials
Cities/city officials: City of Banning; City of Calimesa; City of Canyon Lake; City of Moreno Valley; City of Norco; City of Torrance; Crystal Ruiz, Mayor, City of San Jacinto; Jessica Alexander, Mayor, City of Temecula
Referred to: Housing, Community, and Economic Development Policy Committee WHEREAS, California cities have historically been responsible for adopting general plans and zoning regulations, reviewing housing development proposals, and providing or coordinating the streets, water, wastewater, public safety, parks, transportation, and other infrastructure and services necessary to support responsible, environmentally sound, and well-planned residential growth; and
WHEREAS, the League of California Cities is dedicated to protecting and expanding local control for municipalities across the state to ensure their orderly growth and development; and
WHEREAS, the League of California Cities recognizes that local zoning is a primary function of cities and an essential component of home rule, and that a city’s general plan should guide its land use planning and strategic decision-making free from pre-emption by the state; and
WHEREAS, increasingly prescriptive statewide housing mandates and development approval requirements can override locally adopted plans, zoning standards, and public review procedures without adequately accounting for differences that exist in each unique jurisdict ion in infrastructure capacity, water availability, wildfire and evacuation risks, environmental constraints, fiscal impacts, public service needs, and community priorities; and
WHEREAS, California’s housing goals can be more effectively advanced through state funding, streamlined environmental requirements, and voluntary partnerships that support housing production while preserving the authority of locally elected officials to determine how and where housing is best planned and approved; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities, assembled during the Annual Conference in Anaheim, California, on September 25, 2026, that the League of California Cities support the development and advancement of a state constitutional amend ment or other legislative, policy, or ballot- based strategies that restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters within municipal boundaries, including general plans, housing elements, zoning, density, design and development standards, project siting, and the approval or denial of housing development applications; and
6
2026 Resolution Packet
BE
IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any constitutional amendment or alternative strategy should preserve the State’s authority to establish broad statewide housing goals and enforce constitutional and civil rights, fair housing requirements, building and life -safety standards, and gen erally applicable environmental protections, while protecting cities from state actions that compel, through funding conditions or state law, the approval of housing developments that are inconsistent with locally adopted requirements; override local zonin g or density standards; or invalidate locally adopted housing or land use decisions when a city has planned in good faith to accommodate its regional housing needs allocation and maintains adequate capacity for housing at all income levels; and BE I
T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the League of California Cities consider establishing a statewide working group or other appropriate committee(s) to evaluate and develop a proposed constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters including but limited to: conducting appropriate legal, fiscal, and policy analyses; engaging cities and other stakeholders; and building a statewide coalition of proponent supporters in preparation for; the November 2030 General Election, or within another reasonable time frame as determined by the working group.
7
2026 Resolution Packet
Res
olution No. 1: Background
Information
8
2026 Resolution Packet
Background Information for Resolution
Source: Ci
ty of Murrieta
Background:
Ca
lifornia cities are responsible for planning residential growth, adopting general plans and zoning regulations, reviewing development proposals, and providing or coordinating the infrastructure and public services necessary to support new housing. Since 2010, the State has enacted more than 500 housing-related laws that have increasingly shifted housing and land use authority away from local governments. These laws have expanded by-right development, limited locally adopted standards and review processes, and established enforcement mechanisms, including the builder’s remedy, that may override local plans and zoning. Although these measures are frequently presented as solutions to housing affordability, many increase development capacity or restrict local review without delivering the meaningful production of housing needed to address the housing crisis.
At the same time, the State has continued to prioritize increased development capacity without adequately accounting for the infrastructure, public services, economic realities, and safety measures necessary to support housing growth.
State mandates often fail to reflect local conditions, including roadway and utility capacity, water availability, wildfire exposure, environmental limitations, fiscal impacts, and the availability of essential services. Cities are consequently required to accommodate additional housing while receiving no funding or assistance to address the resulting infrastructure and service demands.
Local elected officials are directly accountable to the residents who experience the effects of development decisions and are responsible for balancing housing production with infrastructure capacity, public safety, environmental protection, fiscal sustainability, and community needs. Cities of all types in California have been grappling with this dynamic, ranging from urban to rural, coastal to inland, small to large, northern to southern, voicing concerns to legislative representatives with minimal responsiveness. This is an issue of statewide concern that needs the strength and diversity of the League of California Cities to pursue a long-term solution.
The proposed resolution directs the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions. The working group would be tasked with developing a more balanced framework that preserves the State’s role in establishing broad housing goals and enforcing constitutional, civil rights, fair housing, building, life-safety, and environmental requirements, while restoring meaningful local authority to allow cities to determine how statewide housing 9
2026 Resolution Packet
objectives should be implemented in a manner that reflects local conditions and community priorities while continuing to support responsible housing production.
As the primary statewide organization representing California cities, the League is uniquely positioned to lead this effort. Its established policy, legal, legislative, communications, and advocacy networks enable it to convene municipalities, evaluate potential strategies, conduct legal and fiscal analyses, build consensus, engage stakeholders, and coordinate with statewide decision-makers. League leadership would help ensure that any recommendation reflects the collective interests of California municipalities and would provide the credibility, organizational capacity, and statewide reach necessary to advance a viable strategy.
10
2026 Resolution Packet
Res
olution No. 1: Letters of
Concurrence
11
12
July 23, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento , CA 95814
City of Banning
Office of the Mayor
Subject: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority
Dear President Quinto,
The City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions .
The proposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to the Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and 25, 2026. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches for addressing the increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards and project approval authority.
On behalf of the City of Banning, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta's submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
Respectfully ,
Richard Royce, Mayor
District 4, City of Banning
~~cJL
Colleen Wallace, City Council Member
District 5, City of Banning
President, Riverside County Division
League of California Cities
99 E. Ramsey St.• P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3100 • Fax (951) 922-3128 13
July 21, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority Dear President Quinto,
The City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions.
The proposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and 25. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches for addressing the increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards, and project approval authority.
On behalf of the City of Calimesa, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta's submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
e Cervantez
ayor
City of Calimesa
July 23, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority
Dear President Quinto,
The City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot -based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions.
The proposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and
25. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches for addressing the increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards, and project approval authority.
On behalf of the City of Can yon Lake, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta’s submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
Sincerely,
Arron Brown
City Manager
City of Canyon Lake
14
July 23, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority
Dear President Quinto,
The City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions.
The proposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and 25. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches to address increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards, and project approval authority.
On behalf of the City of Moreno Valley, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta’s submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
Sincerely,
Brian Mohan
City Manager
City of Moreno Valley
15
J
uly 22, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
S
ubject: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority
D
ear President Quinto,
The
City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions.
The pr
oposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and 25. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches for addressing the increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards, and project approval authority.
O
n behalf of the City of the Norco, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta’s submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
S
incerely,
K
evin Bash
City Council Member
(951) 768-8981
16
17
CITY OF
TORRANCE
SHARON KALANI
MAYOR
July 29, 2026
President Gabe Quinto
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
DAVID KARTSONIS - District I
BRIDGETT LEWIS - District 2
ASAM SHEIKH - District s
VA CANT - District 4
BETTY LIEU - District 5
Dr. JEREMY GERSON - District 6
RE: Support for a Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority
Dear President Quinto,
The City of Murrieta is sponsoring a resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities to establish a statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use decisions.
The proposed resolution, together with the required background materials, will be submitted to Cal Cities for consideration at the 2026 Annual Conference in Orange County on September 24 and 25. The resolution would direct the League to convene a working group to evaluate potential approaches for addressing the increasingly broad and prescriptive state mandates affecting local housing, zoning, development standards, and project approval authority.
On behalf of the City of Torrance, this letter confirms our support for the City of Murrieta's submission of the proposed resolution and its consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
Local authority is essential because cities are best positioned to craft housing strategies tailored to their unique community conditions, infrastructure capacity, and geographic needs.
3031 Torrance Boulevard • Torrance, California 90503 • 310/618-2801 • FAX 310/618-5841 18
When given the flexibility to plan locally, cities can achieve meaningful housing results while maintaining the character and balance of their communities.
The City of Torrance has consistently demonstrated that local control and proactive housing production go hand in hand:
• Housing Corridor Overlay Zone: Through our approved 6th Cycle Housing Element, Torrance created the Housing Corridor Overlay (HCO). This targeted local framework allows for by-right housing and mixed-use development across seven key commercial and transit-adjacent corridors, streamlining approvals and incentivizing production across a full range of income levels.
• Housing Element Progress & Accountability: As documented in our Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APR), Torrance actively tracks, updates, and implements programs-such as aligning our Land Use and Safety Elements-to clear barriers for residential development while ensuring robust infrastructure and public safety standards.
These initiatives illustrate that local governance can effectively drive housing opportunities without one-size-fits-all mandates from the state. Restoring and protecting local land use authority will allow cities across California to continue developing solutions that work best for their residents.
If you have any questions or require further discussion, please feel free to contact Carlos Huizar, Management Associate at (310) 618-5880 or via email at CHuizar@TorranceCA.!!ov.
Sincerely,
~
Sharon Kalani
Mayor, City of Torrance
cc:
Ron Holiday, Mayor Pro Tern, City of Murrieta
Lori Stone, City Councilmember, City of Murrieta
Jeff Kiernan, Los Angeles County Division, [email protected] League of California Cities, [email protected]
Joe A. Gonsalves & Sons, [email protected]
19
595 S San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583
Cell: 951-282-1895 • Office: 951-487-7330
July 23, 2026
Mr. Gabe Quinto, President
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
• email: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Murrieta's Proposed Resolution on Housing and Local Governance Dear League of California Cities Leadership,
I am writing in my individual capacity as Mayor of the City of San Jacinto to express my strong support for the City of Murrieta's proposed resolution, which is scheduled for consideration by the General Assembly at the 2026 Annual Conference.
This resolution represents a timely and important opportunity to thoughtfully examine the balance between California's statewide housing goals and the fundamental constitutional principle of local governance. The proposal to establish a statewide working group to explore a potential constitutional amendment, legislative reforms, or other policy initiatives would create a valuable forum for assessing how local authority over housing and land use decisions can be strengthened while still addressing the State's housing challenges .
Cities are uniquely positioned to understand the distinct needs, opportunities, and constraints of their communities. Local elected officials are directly accountable to the residents they serve and are best equipped to make land use decisions that reflect a community's character, infrastructure capacity, economic development priorities, environmental stewardship, and long-term vision. Moreover, local governments carry the primary responsibility for protecting public safety. Issues such as housing density, transportation, emergency access, wildfire preparedness, evacuation routes, law enforcement and fire service capacity, water availability, and critical infrastructure are inherently local matters that demand the knowledge, judgment, and responsiveness of those who serve their communities daily.
20
While the State has a critical role to play in addressing California's housing needs, a collaborative approach that respects local expertise and preserves meaningful local discretion will result in stronger, safer, and more sustainable communities. The proposed working group offers a constructive path forward to evaluate policies that achieve our shared housing objectives while restoring an appropriate balance between state direction and local authority.
Although this letter reflects my personal position as Mayor and does not constitute an official action or policy of the City of San Jacinto or the San Jacinto City Council, I respectfully endorse the City of Murri eta's submission of this resolution and encourage its favorable consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly.
Thank you for your leadership and your thoughtful consideration of this important matter.
Respectfully,
~c}-4){2~
Crystal Ruiz
Mayor
City of San Jacinto
595 S San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
Cell: 951-282-1895 • Office: 951-487-7330 • email: [email protected] July 23, 2026
Mr. Gabe Quinto, President
League of California Cities
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Support for the City of Murrieta's Resolution Establishing a Working Group to Evaluate a State Constitutional Amendment or Other Initiative to Restore Local Housing and Land Use Authority Dear President Quinto:
I am writing in my individual capacity as Mayor of the City of Temecula to express my strong support for the City of Murrieta's proposed resolution for consideration by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities at the 2026 Annual Conference.
The proposed resolution presents an important opportunity to thoughtfully evaluate the appropriate balance between California's statewide housing objectives and the constitutional principle of local governance. Establishing a statewide working group to examine a potential constitutional amendment, legislative reforms, or other policy initiatives will provide a meaningful forum to assess how local authority over housing and land use decisions can be strengthened while continuing to address the State's housing challenges.
Cities are uniquely positioned to understand the needs, opportunities, and constraints of their communities. Local elected officials are accountable to the residents they serve and are best equipped to make land use decisions that reflect a community's character, infrastructure capacity, economic development goals, environmental stewardship, and long-term vision. Equally important, local governments bear the primary responsibility for protecting public safety. Decisions regarding housing density, transportation, emergency access, wildfire preparedness, evacuation routes, police and fire service capacity, water availability, and critical infrastructure are inherently local matters that require the knowledge and judgment of those who serve their communities every day.
While the State has an important role in addressing California's housing needs, a collaborative approach that respects local expertise and preserves meaningful local discretion will produce stronger, safer, and more sustainable communities. The proposed working group offers an opportunity to evaluate policies that achieve these shared objectives while restoring an appropriate balance between state direction and local authority.
21
Mr. Gabe Quinto, President
League of California Cities
July 23, 2026
Although this letter reflects my personal position and is not an official action or policy of the City of Temecula or the Temecula City Council, I respectfully endorse the City of Murrieta's submission of this resolution and encourage its favorable consideration by the League of California Cities General Assembly.
Thank you for your leadership and your thoughtful consideration of this important issue.
Respectfully,
Jessica Alexander
Mayor, City of Temecula
Signing in her individual capacity
and not on behalf of the City of Temecula
or the Temecula City Council.
22
2026 Resolution Packet
Resolu
tion No. 1: Staff Analysis
23
League of California Cities Staff Analysis on Resolution No. 1
Staff: Brady Guertin, Legislative Advocate
Committee: Housing, Community, and Economic Development
Summary:
Resolution No.1 states that the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) will:
1. Support the development and advancement of a state constitutional amendment or legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategy that restores and strengthens local authority over housing and land use matters, including general plans, housing elements, zoning, density, design and development standards, project siting, and the approval or denial of housing development applications.
Pursuant to the resolution, the strategy should preserve the state’s authority to set broad, statewide housing goals and enforce civil rights, fair housing, building safety, and environmental standards while protecting local control by preventing the state from compelling the approval of developments that conflict with local requirements, override local zoning or density standards, or overturn local land use decisions where a city has planned for and maintained sufficient capacity to meet its housing obligations.
2. Consider establishing a statewide working group or other appropriate committee(s) to evaluate and develop a proposed constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters.
The resolution states: “conducting legal, fiscal, and policy analyses; engaging cities and other stakeholders; and building a statewide coalition of proponent supporters in preparation for the November 2030 General Election, or within another reasonable time period.”
Background:
As provided in the background information, the city of Murrieta is sponsoring this resolution in response to concerns over state laws that have increasingly reduced city discretion over housing and land use decisions, including legislation that requires ministerial or by-right approvals for housing projects, limits the application of local development standards, and strengthens state enforcement mechanisms against local governments.
Additionally, the city of Murrieta, in its background information, maintains that these legislative efforts have not resulted in sufficient housing production to address California's housing shortage and have not adequately accounted for 24
local infrastructure, public service needs, public safety, market, and fiscal considerations.
The res
olution states that California’s housing goals are better advanced through state funding, streamlined environmental requirements, and voluntary partnerships, while preserving local authority over how and where housing is best planned and approved.
Cons
ideration of the resolution may be informed by a brief examination of how the California Constitution allocates authority between the state and cities with respect to land use decisions.
The co
nstitution grants cities the power to adopt local laws to protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare. This grant is called the “police power,” which is the basis for local land use regulation. The constitution grants charter cities the additional power to adopt local laws affecting “municipal affairs.” This power, commonly referred to as “home rule,” is based on the principle that a city, rather than the state, is in the best position to identify and satisfy the needs of the local community.
The co
nstitution’s broad grant of police power contains a significant limitation.
Local law adopted under the police power is not valid if it “conflicts” with state law. A local law “conflicts” with state law when it regulates the same “field” in which the Legislature has stated its intent to occupy. In that case, state law is said to “preempt” the local law and it cannot be enforced.
An ord
inance adopted by a charter city under the municipal affairs power cannot be enforced if it affects a “matter of statewide concern.” The subjects that have been identified as “matters of statewide concern” have changed over the years due to economic, social, and political circumstances.
Since t
he 1960s, the state has enacted numerous laws that limit or preempt aspects of local land use and zoning authority. These laws include the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Housing Element Law, Housing Accountability Act, Density Bonus Law, Permit Streamlining Act, accessory dwelling unit laws, California Environmental Quality Act, and others. In recent years, the state has enacted several laws that Cal Cities was the leading opposition force against, as many of the proposals pre-empted local land use authority, limited public review, and constrained local flexibility. In support of its housing and land use legislation, the Legislature has cited a statewide housing crisis and the need for increased housing production at all income levels while asserting that a uniform approach to local land use decision-making is required. 25
Discussion:
The resolution does not prescribe a specific policy mechanism. The eight letters in support recommend creating a working group or committee to evaluate potential approaches, including legislative proposals, constitutional amendments, or ballot initiatives to strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters.
A discussion of a strategy to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters will need to consider the California Constitution’s framework for both preemption of police power enactments and municipal affairs, discussed above. It will also need to determine whether changes to the California Constitution will be proposed, and whether they constitute an amendment or a revision, which require different processes.
A constitutional revision is a multistep process blending legislative consensus, voter support, and on occasion, a constitutional convention. It requires significant public engagement.
A constitutional amendment would require a ballot initiative, which includes gathering enough valid signatures to qualify for the ballot, building large coalitions to support election efforts, and campaigning to voters to support the initiative. This process can involve significant costs. In the last major election for ballot initiatives in 2024, proponents spent $8-$18 million to qualify for the ballot and spent nearly $700 million for the full election cycle, averaging out to about $100 million per ballot initiative.
Cal Cities has been engaged in ballot advocacy for over 20 years. In the early 2000s, Cal Cities developed a ballot advocacy infrastructure that included forming an issue political action committee, fundraising, establishing a network of regional managers, and building a coalition with other organizations to ultimately advocate on a ballot measure. Ballot advocacy requires the approval of the Board of Directors with a supermajority vote.
In the Legislature, Cal Cities plays an active and influential role to ensure that local flexibility and autonomy in the land use and housing space is maintained by engaging on dozens of bills every legislative session to ensure that cities' voices are heard at the state Capitol. Below, you will find Cal Cities “Existing Policy” on local control, housing, and land use policies.
Fiscal Impact
The resolution itself would not have a significant direct fiscal impact. However, depending on what actions follow, the fiscal costs could be significant.
26
Existing Cal Cities Policy
Vision
To be recognized and respected as the leading advocate for the common interests of California's cities.
Miss
ion Statement
To expand and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy to enhance the quality of life for all Californians.
We Believe
• Local self-governance is the cornerstone of democracy. • Our strength lies in the unity of our diverse communities of interest. • In the involvement of all stakeholders in establishing goals and in solving problems.
• In conducting the business of government with transparency, openness, respect, and civility.
• The spirit of honest public service is what builds communities. • Open decision-making that is of the highest ethical standards honors the public trust.
• Cities are vital to the strength of the California economy. • The vitality of cities is dependent upon their fiscal stability and local autonomy.
• The active participation of all city officials increases the League's effectiveness.
• Partnerships and collaborations are essential elements of focused advocacy and lobbying.
• Ethical and well-informed city officials are essential for responsive, visionary leadership and effective and efficient city operations.
Zoning
Cal Cities believes local zoning is a primary function of cities and is an essential component of home rule. The process of adoption, implementation and enforcement of zoning ordinances should be open and fair to the public and enhance the responsiveness of local decision-makers. State policy should leave local siting and use decisions to the city and not interfere with local prerogative beyond providing a constitutionally valid procedure for adopting local regulations. State agency siting of facilities, including campuses and office buildings, should be subject to local notice and hearing requirements in order to meet concerns of the local community. Cal Cities opposes legislation that seeks to limit local authority over parking requirements.
Hou
sing Element
Housing issues should be addressed in the general plan as other planning issues are. The housing element should be prepared for the benefit of local 27
governments and should have equal status with the other elements of the general plan.
Enc
ourage Full Community Participation
Foster an open and inclusive community dialogue and promote alliances and partnerships to meet community needs.
Well-Pla
nned New Growth
Recognize and preserve open space, watersheds, environmental habitats, and agricultural lands, while accommodating new growth in compact forms, in a manner that:
• De-emphasizes automobile dependency;
• Integrates the new growth into existing communities;
• Creates a diversity of affordable housing near employment centers; • Provides job opportunities for people of all ages and income levels.
Support:
The following letters of concurrence were received:
City of Banning
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake
City of Moreno Valley
City of Norco
City of Torrance
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor, City of San Jacinto
Jessica Alexander, Mayor, City of Temecula
28
AGENDA ITEM 9.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Daniel Barros, City Manager
VIA: Daniel Barros, City Manager
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, August 26, 2026
SUBJECT: Salary Adjustment for Police Chief Position And Budget Amendment
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION INCREASING THE SALARY RANGE FOR THE POLICE CHIEF POSITION AND INCREASING THE TOWN’S FY 2026-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($25,187), PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINE 15378
COUNCIL ADOPTED VALUES
The Staff recommendation is consistent with the Council adopted values of:
• Responsibility: Making decisions after prudent consideration of their financial impact, taking into account the long-term financial needs of the agency. • Fairness: Treat all persons, claims and transactions in a fair and equitable manner.
BACKGROUND
At the June 10, 2026, City Council Meeting, City Council approved the FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget, which included a new job class for a Public Works Director.
At the June 24, 2026, City Council Meeting, City Council approved updated labor memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with the Colma Peace Officer’s Association (POA) and the Colma Police Communications/Records Association (CPRA), and approved increases for the unrepresented staff equal to the increases received by the POA and CPRA. The City Council also approved the latest salary schedule with the labor agreement revisions, which incorporated 3% increases for staff, effective July 5, 2026, not including the Recreation Leader, Senior Recreation Leader, Facility Attendant, Intern, and Student Aide job classes.
ANALYSIS
The City Manager is recommending an increase to the Police Chief position salary range, as the Chief is responsible for the largest department in the Town, with 27.9 full-time equivalent (FTE) AGENDA ITEM 9.
positions, and a $10.79 million budget, which would increase the position’s salary competitiveness, and maintain the current position salary hierarchy with the addition of the new Public Works Director position, authorized in the FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget, with a maximum salary of $132.04 per hour. The City Manager recommends an out-of-cycle increase to the salary range for the Police Chief position from $123.09 per hour, or $256,027.20 per year, to $138.64 per hour, or $288,371.20 per year, which is an increase of $15.55 per hour or 12.63%.
The recommended increase adjusts the Police Chief position salary to align with the Public Works Director position salary plus five percent, or one salary step.
Police Chief Salary Range Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Salary Schedule as of 7/5/2026 103.44 108.60 114.04 118.60 123.09 Proposed Salary Range Effective
9/27/2026 114.06 119.76 125.75 132.04 138.64
FISCAL IMPACT
The financial impact to the Town is approximately $25,187 in FY 2026-27, with $24,230 in increased salary, and an estimated $957 in benefits, which accounts for 2.5% longevity pay, additional Medicare expense, and Retirement Health Savings Account costs. Staff are requesting an amendment to use $25,187 in General Fund reserves to cover the additional expense. The annualized cost of the salary increase is $34,467.
ENVIRONMENTAL
This item has no anticipated environmental impact.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could choose not to adopt the resolution increasing the salary range for the Police Chief position, and amending the budget to account for the increase in the Police Chief position salary. The City Council could also request review of one or more of the Town’s job classifications and their associated salary ranges to maintain internal salary equity and market competitiveness.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution to increase the Police Chief position’s salary range and increase the Town’s budget for salaries in Fund 11 – General Fund, Org 210 – Police Administration, by $25,187.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Colma Reso 2026-XX Police Chief Compaction and Budget Amendment
25977.00100\45365325.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF COLMA
RESOLUTION INCREASING THE SALARY RANGE FOR THE POLICE CHIEF POSITION AND INCREASING THE TOWN’S FY 2026-27 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($25,187), PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINE 15378 The City Council of the Town of Colma does hereby resolve as follows:
1 . Background.
(a) The City Manager is recommending an increase to the Police Chief position salary range, as the Chief is responsible for the largest department in the Town, with 27.9 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, and a $10.79 million budget, which would increase the position’s salary competitiveness, and maintain the current position salary hierarchy with the addition of the new Public Works Director position, authorized in the FY 2026- 27 Adopted Budget, with a maximum salary of $132.04 per hour. (b) The City Manager recommends an out-of-cycle increase to the salary range for the Police Chief position from $123.09 per hour, or $256,027.20 per year, to $138.64 per hour, or $288,371.20 per year, which is an increase of $15.55 per hour or 12.63%.
2. Salary Scale for Police Chief The Town shall pay the Police Chief the respective hourly salaries shown below, with the City Manager determining the appropriate step in accordance with Subchapter 3.02 of the Colma Administrative Code relating to Employment.
Police Chief
STEP 1 2 3 4 5
114.06 119.76 125.75 132.04 138.64
3. Budg
et Amendment.
(a) The FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget for the Town of Colma is hereby amended to increase the General Fund (11) expenditure budget as follows:
(i) Police Administration (Fund 11, Org 210) by $25,187. (b) The funds described in this resolution are hereby appropriated as described above.
4. No Contract. Nothing herein shall be construed as a contract with any employee, and the City Council shall have the discretion to modify the respective salaries in accordance with any applicable state or local provisions.
5. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective upon adoption. //
//
//
ATTACHMENT A
25977.00100\45365325.1
Certification of Adoption
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on August 26, 2026 by the following vote:
Name Voting Present, Not Voting Absent
Aye No Abstain Not Participating
Carrie Slaughter, Mayor
Helen Fisicaro
Ken Gonzalez
Joanne F. del Rosario
Thomas Walsh
Voting Tally
Dated ______________________ ___________________________________ Carrie Slaughter, Mayor
Attest: ____________________________
Michelle Estabillo, City Clerk