Agenda packet — Colton City Council, February 1, 2022 (part 8 of 8)

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 6.4 5.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.24
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.16 0.13
Control Delay 9.6 7.0 4.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.6 7.0 4.0

LOS A A A
Approach Delay 9.6 7.0 4.0
Approach LOS A A A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 2 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 23 13
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 283 148 585
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1685 1764 1434
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.04
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 24.8
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.16
Intersection Signal Delay: 6.4 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road

7.d
Packet Pg. 1695 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 45 51 958 33 38 1233
Future Volume (vph) 45 51 958 33 38 1233
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 255
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1626 1664 3282 1404 1641 3343
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1664 3282 1404 1641 3343
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 54 37
Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 358 1109 1552
Travel Time (s) 8.1 16.8 23.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 10% 10% 15% 10% 8%
Adj. Flow (vph) 47 54 1064 37 46 1504
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 47 54 1064 37 46 1504
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft)000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Turn Type Prot Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases82 1 6
Permitted Phases82
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 25.0 65.0
Total Split (%) 31.6% 31.6% 42.1% 42.1% 26.3% 68.4%
Maximum Green (s) 25.5 25.5 35.5 35.5 20.5 60.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0000 0
Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 22.5 32.5 32.5 17.5 57.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1696 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.34 0.18 0.61
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.95 0.07 0.15 0.74
Control Delay 29.6 9.1 48.4 7.6 34.1 16.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 29.6 9.1 48.4 7.6 34.1 16.4

LOS CADACB
Approach Delay 18.7 47.0 16.9
Approach LOSBDB
Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 0 324 0 24 315
Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 29 #461 21 50 335
Internal Link Dist (ft) 278 1029 1472
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 255
Base Capacity (vph) 385 435 1122 504 302 2023
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.95 0.07 0.15 0.74
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 95
Actuated Cycle Length: 95
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Pretimed
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95
Intersection Signal Delay: 29.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 3: La Cadena Dr

7.d
Packet Pg. 1697 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Barton Rd & Terrance Ave 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 25 48 80 19 22 17
Future Volume (vph) 25 48 80 19 22 17
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.940
Flt Protected 0.983 0.973
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1646 1727 1615 1150 0
Flt Permitted 0.983 0.973
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1646 1727 1615 1150 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 358 193 706
Travel Time (s) 7.0 3.8 16.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.75
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 10% 10% 0% 25% 84%
Adj. Flow (vph) 28 53 89 21 29 23
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 81 89 21 52 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 00
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1698 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Terrance Ave & Barton Rd 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 15 69 42 15 105 44
Future Volume (vph) 15 69 42 15 105 44
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 16 16
Grade (%) 0% 2% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.889 0.960
Flt Protected 0.964 0.966
Satd. Flow (prot) 1327 0 0 1077 1298 0
Flt Permitted 0.964 0.966
Satd. Flow (perm) 1327 0 0 1077 1298 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 193 1279 557
Travel Time (s) 3.8 24.9 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.63 0.63
Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 52% 89% 9% 50% 63%
Adj. Flow (vph) 16 75 46 16 167 70
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 91 0 0 62 237 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft)0 0 16
Link Offset(ft)0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.85 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.85 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1699 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 52 16 0 0 56 73 0 0 0 25 0 0
Future Volume (vph) 52 16 0 0 56 73 0 0 0 25 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 16 12 16
Grade (%) 2% 0% 0% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.924
Flt Protected 0.963 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1595 0 0 1745 0 0 1863 0 0 1671 0
Flt Permitted 0.688 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1139 0 0 1745 0 0 1863 0 0 1671 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 78
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1279 356 165 665
Travel Time (s) 24.9 6.9 3.8 15.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.92 0.75 Heavy Vehicles (%) 15% 9% 2% 2% 14% 14% 2% 2% 2% 8% 2% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 59 18 0 0 60 78 0 0 0 33 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 33 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0000
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA NA Split NA
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0

7.d
Packet Pg. 1700 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Construction PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (%) 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 44.4% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 7.5 7.5 6.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.10
Control Delay 13.4 7.3 12.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 13.4 7.3 12.2

LOS B A B
Approach Delay 13.4 7.3 12.2
Approach LOS B A B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 8 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 34 19
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 276 85 585
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1137 1742 1159
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.03
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 30.6
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28
Intersection Signal Delay: 9.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road

7.d
Packet Pg. 1701 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 202 174 441 118 226 1428
Future Volume (vph) 202 174 441 118 226 1428
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 255
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1626 1743 3282 1442 1656 3343
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1743 3282 1442 1656 3343
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 161 131
Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 358 721 906
Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.9 13.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 5% 10% 12% 9% 8%
Adj. Flow (vph) 213 183 490 131 276 1741
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 213 183 490 131 276 1741
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft)000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Turn Type Prot Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases82 1 6
Permitted Phases82
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 35.0 35.0 15.0 50.0
Total Split (%) 33.3% 33.3% 46.7% 46.7% 20.0% 66.7%
Maximum Green (s) 20.5 20.5 30.5 30.5 10.5 45.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0000 0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.5 17.5 27.5 27.5 7.5 42.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1702 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.57
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.35 0.41 0.21 1.67 0.92
Control Delay 32.0 7.9 19.0 4.3 354.6 24.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 32.0 7.9 19.0 4.3 354.6 24.5

LOS C A B A F C
Approach Delay 20.9 15.9 69.7
Approach LOSCBE
Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 8 87 0 ~191 352
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 55 127 32 #294 386
Internal Link Dist (ft) 278 641 826
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 255
Base Capacity (vph) 379 530 1203 611 165 1894
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.35 0.41 0.21 1.67 0.92
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 75
Actuated Cycle Length: 75
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Pretimed
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.67
Intersection Signal Delay: 52.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 3: La Cadena Dr

7.d
Packet Pg. 1703 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Barton Rd & Terrace Ave 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 27 368 340 14 15 36
Future Volume (vph) 27 368 340 14 15 36
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.905
Flt Protected 0.997 0.986
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1711 1759 1615 1017 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1711 1759 1615 1017 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 358 193 706
Travel Time (s) 7.0 3.8 16.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.75
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 10% 8% 0% 25% 84%
Adj. Flow (vph) 30 409 378 16 20 48
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 439 378 16 68 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 00
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1704 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: S Terrance Ave & Barton Rd 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 350 32 15 318 20 17
Future Volume (vph) 350 32 15 318 20 17
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 16 16
Grade (%) 0% 2% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.989 0.938
Flt Protected 0.998 0.974
Satd. Flow (prot) 1906 0 0 1668 1262 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.974
Satd. Flow (perm) 1906 0 0 1668 1262 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 193 1279 557
Travel Time (s) 3.8 24.9 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.63 0.63
Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 52% 89% 9% 50% 63%
Adj. Flow (vph) 380 35 16 346 32 27
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 415 0 0 362 59 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft)0 0 16
Link Offset(ft)0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.85 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.85 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1705 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 40 330 0 0 300 35 0 0 0 77 0 59
Future Volume (vph) 40 330 0 0 300 35 0 0 0 77 0 59
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 16 12 16
Storage Length (ft) 90 0 90 90 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.941
Flt Protected 0.950 0.972
Satd. Flow (prot) 1570 1743 0 1863 3589 1599 0 1900 0 0 1616 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.824
Satd. Flow (perm) 1570 1743 0 1863 3589 1599 0 1900 0 0 1370 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 121 121
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1279 238 74 665
Travel Time (s) 24.9 4.6 1.7 15.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.92 0.75 Heavy Vehicles (%) 15% 9% 2% 2% 14% 1% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 45 375 0 0 323 38 0 0 0 103 0 79
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 375 0 0 323 38 0 0 0 0 182 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 11
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 4
Permitted Phases 6 3 4
Detector Phase 5 2 16633 44
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

7.d
Packet Pg. 1706 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd 02/13/2020
Opening Year AM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 31.6% 31.6% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 25.5 10.5 25.5 25.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max Max Max Max None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 4.7 30.3 22.9 22.9 6.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.39 0.29 0.29 0.09
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.55 0.31 0.07 0.79
Control Delay 55.1 22.3 24.5 0.2 38.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 55.1 22.3 24.5 0.2 38.8

LOS E C C A D
Approach Delay 25.9 22.0 38.8
Approach LOS C C D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 134 67 0 31
Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 239 121 0 99
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 158 1 585
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 90
Base Capacity (vph) 154 678 1058 556 407
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.55 0.31 0.07 0.45
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 95
Actuated Cycle Length: 77.8
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd

7.d
Packet Pg. 1707 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 191 209 817 160 287 970
Future Volume (vph) 191 209 817 160 287 970
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 20 0 255
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 1606 3252 1468 1626 3282
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 1606 3252 1468 1626 3282
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 113 174
Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 358 853 894
Travel Time (s) 8.1 12.9 13.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 14% 11% 10% 11% 10%
Adj. Flow (vph) 203 222 888 174 299 1010
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 222 888 174 299 1010
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft)000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Turn Type Prot Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases82 1 6
Permitted Phases82
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 35.0 35.0 20.0 55.0
Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 43.8% 43.8% 25.0% 68.8%
Maximum Green (s) 20.5 20.5 30.5 30.5 15.5 50.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0000 0
Act Effct Green (s) 17.5 17.5 27.5 27.5 12.5 47.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1708 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.34 0.16 0.59
v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.79 0.28 1.18 0.52
Control Delay 34.5 18.2 30.2 4.5 146.5 10.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.5 18.2 30.2 4.5 146.5 10.7

LOS CBCAFB
Approach Delay 26.0 26.0 41.7
Approach LOSCCD
Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 46 207 0 ~182 141
Queue Length 95th (ft) 158 111 280 40 #332 189
Internal Link Dist (ft) 278 773 814
Turn Bay Length (ft) 20 255
Base Capacity (vph) 365 439 1117 618 254 1948
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.79 0.28 1.18 0.52
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 80
Offset: 54 (68%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Pretimed
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18
Intersection Signal Delay: 33.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 3: La Cadena Dr

7.d
Packet Pg. 1709 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Barton Rd & Terrace Ave 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 32 436 436 32 4 16
Future Volume (vph) 32 436 436 32 4 16
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.892
Flt Protected 0.997 0.990
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1596 1712 991 1398 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.990
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1596 1712 991 1398 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 358 193 706
Travel Time (s) 7.0 3.8 16.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 55% 16% 11% 63% 100% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 34 464 474 35 8 32
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 498 474 35 40 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 00
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1710 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: S Terrance Ave & Barton Rd 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 351 69 25 350 82 55
Future Volume (vph) 351 69 25 350 82 55
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 16 16
Grade (%) 0% 2% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.978 0.946
Flt Protected 0.997 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot) 1768 0 0 1676 1618 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 1768 0 0 1676 1618 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 193 1279 557
Travel Time (s) 3.8 24.9 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.63
Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 60% 38% 10% 17% 30%
Adj. Flow (vph) 369 73 29 402 130 87
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 442 0 0 431 217 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft)0 0 16
Link Offset(ft)0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.85 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.85 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1711 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 61 356 0 0 363 56 0 0 0 53 0 29
Future Volume (vph) 61 356 0 0 363 56 0 0 0 53 0 29
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 16
Storage Length (ft) 90 0 90 90 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.952
Flt Protected 0.950 0.969
Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 1712 0 1863 3195 1346 0 1863 0 0 1330 0 Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 1712 0 1863 3195 1346 0 1863 0 0 1372 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 121 121
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1279 238 87 665
Travel Time (s) 24.9 4.6 2.0 15.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.92 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 11% 100% 2% 13% 20% 2% 2% 2% 29% 2% 37% Adj. Flow (vph) 68 396 0 0 395 61 0 0 0 62 0 34
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 68 396 0 0 395 61 0 0 0 0 96 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 11
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 4
Permitted Phases 6 3 4
Detector Phase 5 2 16633 44
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

7.d
Packet Pg. 1712 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Opening Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 31.6% 31.6% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 25.5 10.5 25.5 25.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max Max Max Max None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 6.2 53.4 41.7 41.7 3.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.56 0.44 0.44 0.04
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.41 0.28 0.09 0.57
Control Delay 66.7 14.5 20.3 0.4 18.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 66.7 14.5 20.3 0.4 18.7

LOS E B C A B
Approach Delay 22.2 17.6 18.7
Approach LOS C B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 131 82 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 82 226 138 2 33
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 158 7 585
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 90
Base Capacity (vph) 140 962 1403 658 351
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.41 0.28 0.09 0.27
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 95
Actuated Cycle Length: 95
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 85
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.8 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road

7.d
Packet Pg. 1713 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 279 240 1127 221 311 1969
Future Volume (vph) 279 240 1127 221 311 1969
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 255
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1626 1664 3282 1404 1641 3343
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1664 3282 1404 1641 3343
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 100 219
Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 358 721 906
Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.9 13.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82
Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 10% 10% 15% 10% 8%
Adj. Flow (vph) 294 253 1252 246 379 2401
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 294 253 1252 246 379 2401
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft)000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Turn Type Prot Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases82 1 6
Permitted Phases82
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 5.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 55.0 55.0 30.0 80.0
Total Split (%) 26.1% 26.1% 47.8% 47.8% 26.1% 69.6%
Maximum Green (s) 25.5 25.5 50.5 50.5 25.5 75.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0000 0
Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 22.5 47.5 47.5 22.5 77.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1714 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.20 0.67
v/c Ratio 0.92 0.62 0.92 0.35 1.18 1.07
Control Delay 80.7 32.8 44.5 5.6 149.9 59.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 80.7 32.8 44.5 5.6 149.9 59.6

LOS F C D A F E
Approach Delay 58.5 38.1 71.9
Approach LOSEDE
Queue Length 50th (ft) 216 103 455 12 ~337 ~1034
Queue Length 95th (ft) #382 193 #602 63 #459 #984
Internal Link Dist (ft) 278 641 826
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 255
Base Capacity (vph) 318 406 1355 708 321 2252
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.62 0.92 0.35 1.18 1.07
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 115
Actuated Cycle Length: 115
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Pretimed
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18
Intersection Signal Delay: 59.9 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 3: La Cadena Dr

7.d
Packet Pg. 1715 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Barton Rd & Terrace Ave 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 37 507 469 19 20 50
Future Volume (vph) 37 507 469 19 20 50
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.904
Flt Protected 0.997 0.986
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1712 1727 1615 1014 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1712 1727 1615 1014 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 358 193 706
Travel Time (s) 7.0 3.8 16.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.75
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 10% 10% 0% 25% 84%
Adj. Flow (vph) 41 563 521 21 27 67
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 604 521 21 94 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 00
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1716 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: S Terrance Ave & Barton Rd 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 482 44 20 438 28 23
Future Volume (vph) 482 44 20 438 28 23
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 16 16
Grade (%) 0% 2% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.989 0.938
Flt Protected 0.998 0.974
Satd. Flow (prot) 1907 0 0 1668 1262 0
Flt Permitted 0.998 0.974
Satd. Flow (perm) 1907 0 0 1668 1262 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 193 1279 557
Travel Time (s) 3.8 24.9 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.63 0.63
Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 52% 89% 9% 50% 63%
Adj. Flow (vph) 524 48 22 476 44 37
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 572 0 0 498 81 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft)0 0 16
Link Offset(ft)0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.85 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.85 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1717 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 56 455 0 0 414 48 0 0 0 107 0 82
Future Volume (vph) 56 455 0 0 414 48 0 0 0 107 0 82
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 16 12 12 12 12 16 12 16
Storage Length (ft) 90 0 90 90 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.942
Flt Protected 0.950 0.972
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 0 1863 4011 1583 0 1863 0 0 1706 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 0 1863 4011 1583 0 1863 0 0 1667 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 121 121
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1279 238 74 665
Travel Time (s) 24.9 4.6 1.7 15.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.92 0.75 Adj. Flow (vph) 64 517 0 0 445 52 0 0 0 143 0 109
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 517 0 0 445 52 0 0 0 0 252 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 11
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 4
Permitted Phases 6 3 4
Detector Phase 5 2 16633 44
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1718 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd 02/13/2020
Barton Road Existing 09/12/2019 No Build Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 31.6% 31.6% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 25.5 10.5 25.5 25.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max Max None None None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 4.6 31.5 24.5 24.5 8.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.57 0.44 0.44 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.48 0.25 0.07 0.72
Control Delay 36.1 9.5 12.7 0.2 25.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 36.1 9.5 12.7 0.2 25.0

LOS D A B A C
Approach Delay 12.4 11.4 25.0
Approach LOS B B C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 86 53 0 43
Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 185 105 1 111
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 158 1 585
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 90
Base Capacity (vph) 247 1066 1782 770 625
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.48 0.25 0.07 0.40
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 95
Actuated Cycle Length: 55.1
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Rd

7.d
Packet Pg. 1719 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 263 288 1127 221 396 1337
Future Volume (vph) 263 288 1127 221 396 1337
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 16 12 12 12 12
Storage Length (ft) 0 20 0 255
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 1578 3223 1223 1612 3252
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 1578 3223 1223 1612 3252
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 86 218
Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45
Link Distance (ft) 358 853 894
Travel Time (s) 8.1 12.9 13.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96
Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 16% 12% 32% 12% 11%
Adj. Flow (vph) 280 306 1225 240 413 1393
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 280 306 1225 240 413 1393
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft)000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Turn Type Prot Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases82 1 6
Permitted Phases82
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 45.0 45.0 30.0 75.0
Total Split (%) 28.6% 28.6% 42.9% 42.9% 28.6% 71.4%
Maximum Green (s) 25.5 25.5 40.5 40.5 25.5 70.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0000 0
Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 22.5 37.5 37.5 22.5 67.5

7.d
Packet Pg. 1720 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: La Cadena Dr 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.36 0.36 0.21 0.64
v/c Ratio 0.79 0.76 1.06 0.42 1.20 0.67
Control Delay 56.5 40.7 79.0 6.9 150.8 13.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 56.5 40.7 79.0 6.9 150.8 13.7

LOS E D E A F B
Approach Delay 48.3 67.2 45.1
Approach LOSDED
Queue Length 50th (ft) 179 141 ~480 10 ~337 281
Queue Length 95th (ft) #308 #266 #613 66 #527 353
Internal Link Dist (ft) 278 773 814
Turn Bay Length (ft) 20 255
Base Capacity (vph) 354 405 1151 576 345 2090
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.79 0.76 1.06 0.42 1.20 0.67
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 105
Actuated Cycle Length: 105
Offset: 62 (59%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Pretimed
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.20
Intersection Signal Delay: 53.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 3: La Cadena Dr

7.d
Packet Pg. 1721 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: Barton Rd & Terrace Ave 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 44 601 490 26 6 22
Future Volume (vph) 44 601 490 26 6 22
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.894
Flt Protected 0.997 0.989
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1711 1727 1615 980 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.989
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1711 1727 1615 980 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 358 193 706
Travel Time (s) 7.0 3.8 16.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 10% 10% 0% 25% 84%
Adj. Flow (vph) 47 639 533 28 12 44
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 686 533 28 56 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 00
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1722 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: S Terrance Ave & Barton Rd 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 484 95 35 482 113 76
Future Volume (vph) 484 95 35 482 113 76
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 16 16
Grade (%) 0% 2% 0%
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.978 0.946
Flt Protected 0.997 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 0 0 1676 1618 0
Flt Permitted 0.997 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 0 0 1676 1618 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance (ft) 193 1279 557
Travel Time (s) 3.8 24.9 12.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.63
Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 60% 38% 10% 17% 30%
Adj. Flow (vph) 509 100 40 554 179 121
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 609 0 0 594 300 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft)0 0 16
Link Offset(ft)0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 0.85 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.85 0.85
Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15

7.d
Packet Pg. 1723 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 85 491 0 0 500 77 0 0 0 73 0 39
Future Volume (vph) 85 491 0 0 500 77 0 0 0 73 0 39
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 16 12 16
Storage Length (ft) 90 0 90 90 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.953
Flt Protected 0.950 0.968
Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 1712 0 1863 3195 1346 0 1863 0 0 1330 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.802
Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 1712 0 1863 3195 1346 0 1863 0 0 1102 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 121 121
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1279 238 87 665
Travel Time (s) 24.9 4.6 2.0 15.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.92 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 11% 2% 2% 13% 20% 2% 2% 2% 29% 2% 37% Adj. Flow (vph) 94 546 0 0 543 84 0 0 0 85 0 45
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 94 546 0 0 543 84 0 0 0 0 130 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0000
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 11111 11
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 00000 00
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 4
Permitted Phases 6 3 4
Detector Phase 5 2 16633 44
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

7.d
Packet Pg. 1724 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road 02/13/2020
Buildout Year PM Synchro 10 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 30.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 31.6% 31.6% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% 26.3% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 25.5 10.5 25.5 25.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Lost Time (s) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None Max Max Max Max None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0000 00
Act Effct Green (s) 8.1 49.6 34.0 34.0 5.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.52 0.36 0.36 0.06
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.61 0.48 0.15 0.74
Control Delay 62.9 20.6 26.9 2.8 33.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 62.9 20.6 26.9 2.8 33.8

LOS E C C A C
Approach Delay 26.8 23.7 33.8
Approach LOS C C C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 208 127 0 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 382 213 18 61
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1199 158 7 585
Turn Bay Length (ft) 90 90
Base Capacity (vph) 158 894 1143 559 301
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.61 0.48 0.15 0.43
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 95
Actuated Cycle Length: 95
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 10: Barton Rd & Grand Terrance Road

7.d
Packet Pg. 1725 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

BARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

APPENDIX H - RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS

7.d
Packet Pg. 1726 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction L-1

APPENDIX H

BARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROEJCT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
October 2021
The primary objective and purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration public review process is to obtain comments on the adequacy of the analysis of environmental impacts, the mitigation measures presented, and other analyses contained in the Initial Study prepared by the City of Colton (City). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the City decisionmakers consider the comments received during the public review of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to carrying out or approving the project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074[b]). Comments that do not directly relate to the analysis in this document (i.e., are outside the scope of this document) are not given specific responses; however, all comments are included in this section so that the decision-makers may know the opinions of the commenter.

The Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project (Project) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was circulated to the public and public agencies for a 30-day public review period from July 19 to August 18, 2021. One comment was received:
• Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (Matthew Bates, PE) August 18, 2021 Information provided in this this Appendix clarifies, amplifies, or makes minor modifications to the IS/MND. No significant changes have been made to the information contained in the IS/MND as a result of the responses to comments, and no significant new information has been added that would require recirculation of the document.

7.d
Packet Pg. 1727 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Our Mission…
EVMWD will provide reliable, cost-effective, high quality water and wastewater services that are dedicated to the people we serve.
951.674.3146 31315 Chaney Street
Fax 951.674.9872 P.O. Box 3000
www.evmwd.com Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Board of Directors
Andy Morris, President
Phil Williams, Vice President
Darcy Burke, Treasurer
Harvey R. Ryan, Director
Chance Edmondson, Director

General Manager
Greg Thomas
District Secretary
Terese Quintanar
Legal Counsel
Best Best & Krieger

August 18, 2021
City of Colton
Victor Ortiz, PE, City Engineer
Public Works Department
160 10th Street
Colton, CA 92324
Sent Via: [email protected]
SUBJECT: BARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT - Notice of Intent to adopt mitigated negative declaration Dear Mr. Ortiz:

The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (“District”) received the Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the Barton Road Bridge Removal and Reconstruction Project (“Project”). This letter is to express our initial concerns regarding the MND and the Project’s potential impacts to District property and to the environment. The District is the owner of APN: 1167-051-02-0000 (“Property”), located along Barton Road at the intersection of Terrace Avenue. While Figure 3 of the MND purports to depict this property, it does so inaccurately. The District’s Palm Avenue Well (“Well”), which is located on the Property, is utilized for groundwater extraction purposes and is a vital District asset. Additionally, the District’s Well Discharge Line extends from the Property, along Barton Road, to the Riverside Canal. Based on our review of the MND and exhibits provided, the District is providing the following comments.

1. The Project Description is defective. It fails to accurately describe all components of the Project. For example, will the District’s 12-inch Well Discharge Line require relocation? An analysis of impacts of such relocation was completely omitted. What will be the new location and alignment of that line? What impacts will occur as a result of that relocation? What right-of-way will be acquired from the District? While the diagrams appear to suggest that right-of-way is needed on the District’s property, the District’s property is not described on page 5, top paragraph, where the impacted APNs are listed. Also, the MND fails to describe the driveway improvements that will be necessary from the improved roadway to the District’s Property.

2. This Project is clearly part of the roadway improvements needed for the proposed Barton Road Logistics Center. That project is predicated upon the completion of the roadway improvements in this Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project. Yet that project is never mentioned in the MND. The roadway improvements are part and parcel of that Project, and this MND improperly treats them as a separate project rather than mitigation/ improvements for the larger project. This is improper piecemealing.

3. The MND fails to properly identify the Responsible Agencies. For example, while Caltrans is listed as a Project Sponsor, and the Project is identified as being

7.d
Packet Pg. 1728 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Mr. Ortiz, City of Colton
Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project MND Comment Letter

Page 2 ends

undertaken in coordination with Caltrans, there is no description of what approvals Caltrans must issue for this project. Moreover, given that significant utility relocation is needed for the Project, including the possible relocation of District’s Well Discharge Line, why are the owners of such lines not identified as Responsible Agencies.

4. The Comment Period is defective. The MND set a 20-day review period. See MND, p. 2. However, given Caltrans’ role in the Project, a minimum of 30 days was required. (Public Res. Code § 21091.)

5. Figure 3 indicates that the City desires to obtain a temporary construction easement (TCE) from the District over the Property. The MND fails to include sufficient detail regarding use of the District’s property. Will the District’s access to its Property be affected for any time? The District has serious concerns over the use of its Property and requests the City contact the District to discuss this matter in more detail.

6. The Project Description states “Construct driveway approaches joining existing driveways to City of Colton and Grand Terrace standards” (Section 2.3, underline added). Proper curb and gutter street improvements do not exists fronting the Property. Therefore, it is unclear if the Project intends to add a driveway to the Property. The District requests a commercial driveway approach be constructed fronting the Property. The lack of such driveway would greatly impact the District’s ability to access its Property.

7. The Project Description states ”Relocate the Riverside Highland Water Company line, City waterline, fiber optic cables, and gas line in the existing bridge and roadway…” (Section 2.3). The District’s Well Discharge Line exists within the entire Project Boundary however, there is no mention of our facility and possible impacts. The City has failed to properly evaluate impacts to District facilities. Moreover, the impacts associated with the relocation of the District’s Well Discharge Line have not been assessed. Will there be any disruption of that line’s operation? What are the impacts of the installation of the line in its new location? Are there biological impacts associated with that relocation? Geological or soil impacts? Archeological Impacts? It is assumed that relocation will be required based on recent relocation efforts conducted as part of the Barton Road Interchange Project. The District requests the City properly evaluate impacts to District facility and determine its relocation is necessary.

8. The MND fails to include sufficient detail within the Project Description or exhibits to fully assess impacts to the District’s Well Discharge Line. The District requests the City pothole the waterline to verify the location (horizontal and vertical) and determine impacts. The District requests that the City submit all design submittals (typically 30, 60, 90 and 100 percent designs) to the District for review.

9. The MND reflects an improper pre-commitment to condemn property. On page 5, the MND simply announces that the necessary property “will be acquired.” This announcement is unlawful. The City has not undertaken the necessary steps to make such a pronouncement. It has not made offers to the property owners for the right-of7.d Packet Pg. 1729 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Mr. Ortiz, City of Colton
Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction Project MND Comment Letter

Page 3 ends

way. It has not negotiated with the owners. It has not adopted a resolution of necessity.

10. The MND fails to adequately describe the setting and Surrounding Land Uses. No mention of the District’s property is made, or its existing well or discharge line.

11. The MND fails to identify or assess the Project’s growth inducing effects. The Project Description makes it clear that the existing bridge serves as a serious impediment to high intensity uses in the area that utilize that segment of roadway. The bridge is too narrow and structurally unsound. This project is quite literally “paving the way” for the Barton Road Logistics Center. Yet the growth inducing effect is never mentioned. To the contrary, it is simply concluded that the project “is not growth inducing” without any further explanation. (MND, pages 24, 74.)

12. The MND completely fails to address the potentially significant cumulative effects of the Project when combined with the immediately adjacent Barton Road Logistics Center project. Indeed, the MND simply ignores that project, even though it is very clear that the Logistics Center is necessitating this Project. Page 93 of the MND simply omits any reference to the Logistics Center any the various other projects in the area.

What will be the air quality impacts if the side-by-side projects are constructed at the same time? What will be the traffic impacts? The noise impacts? There is no assessment of these important issues.

The District has serious concerns related to Project impacts and the lack of coordination with the District relating to both this Project and the Logistics Center. Nonetheless, we are committed to working with the City to resolve these concerns and we look forward to meeting with you to discuss them further in the very near future. Please feel free to contact me at [email protected] or 951-674-3146 x8208.

Thank you,
Matthew Bates, P.E.

Engineering Manager
Cc: Margie Armstrong, EVMWD
M. Katherine Jenson, Rutan & Tucker, LLP
Jeremy Jungreis, Rutan & Tucker, LLP

7.d
Packet Pg. 1730 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC C OMMENTS

I NITIAL S TUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OCTOBER 2021

APPENDIX H

B ARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
H-5
RESPONSE TO LETTER 1: Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) owns APN: 1167-051-02-0000 located along Barton Road at the intersection of Terrace Avenue and describes the appropriate boundary of this parcel. Figure 3 (attached) has been revised to reflect this corrected boundary.

The project will not impact the well house; therefore, the map correction does not result not raise a significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact. No recirculation of the IS/MND is warranted.

Response to Comment 1: The assumption that the existing 12” EVMWD line would not be affected by the project was based on the information provided by EVMWD in July of 2019. Further investigations have found that the existing 12” line from the existing well site at South Terrace Drive to the abandoned Railroad tracks is deep enough and is not impacted by the proposed Barton Road reconstruction. However, due to the location of the existing 12” line east of the abandoned tracks, it will be in conflict with the proposed improvements. Based on this assessment, the vertical relocation of approximately 450 feet of the existing waterline is required to maintain the minimum cover with the reconstructed roadway. Barton Road between Grand Terrace Road and South Terrace Drive will be closed to traffic during construction. The EVMWD waterline relocation can be performed prior to the roadway reconstruction. As the project is refined and new information is subsequently made available, the City will coordinate directly with the utility providers to ensure the appropriate relocation of facilities per the applicable provisions of the respective utility. As is typical with this sort of utility effort, it is reasonable to conclude coordination between the City, the roadway design team, and EVMWD engineers will minimize impacts to the 12” line.

This comment does not raise a significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 2 The commenter’s opinion that the roadway improvements are “clearly” required for the Barton Road Logistics Center Project (BRLCP) are erroneous. The Cities of Colton and Grand Terrace have long recognized the needed improvements on Barton Road through the project area. This long established need for a safe and efficient replacement of the current bridge pre-dates the use of the BRLC Project site by its current tenants or the current proponents of the BRLC project1 .

Barton Road Bridge was originally built in 1936 as a two-lane bridge over the UPRR railroad tracks (one lane in each direction). The bridge is structurally unsound and the 25-foot wide bridge deck does not provide adequate pedestrian or bicycle access in accordance with City standards. A review of the existing bridge’s plans shows the design does not account for seismic loading, which is now required in the state of California. The Bridge Inspection Report shows a low sufficiently rating of 58.8 due to low load rating and a roadway geometry that does not meet current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials standards. The railroad tracks below the Barton Road Bridge have been abandoned and removed; as such, there is no longer the need to span the railroad tracks 1 see 2019 Federal State Transportation Improvement Program, page SBDS08, “BRIDGE NO. 54C, BARTON RD, OVER UP RR, 0.25 MI W ROUTE 215. Replace 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane Asphalt roadway, Minor seismic contribution. The City of Colton will be the implementing agency for design and construction.”

7.d
Packet Pg. 1731 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC C OMMENTS

I NITIAL S TUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OCTOBER 2021

APPENDIX H

B ARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
H-6
with a bridge. Because the railroad tracks under the bridge have been removed, there is no need for a bridge crossing at this location. The area under the bridge will be filled, and the existing bridge will be replaced with a two-lane at grade asphalt roadway to connect to the existing roadway to the east and west of the bridge. Continuous pedestrian and bicycle access through the project area will installed through the project area to meet the requirements of both Cities.

The commenter does not identify how the Project is necessary for the proposed BRLCP. The Traffic Study for the BRLCP did not identify the bridge removal/replacement improvements as mitigation for any its project impacts. The commenter does not present evidence that the BRLCP requires the proposed roadway improvements detailed in the IS/MND.

The existing two lane bridge will be replaced with a two lane roadway. The Project does not increase travel lanes through the project area. Due to the long-standing desire to provide roadway improvements through the project area, the Bridge Removal and Road construction project has a purpose and need separate and independent of any existing or planned development project in either City.

This comment does not raise a significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 3: The project has undergone Caltrans review subject to the applicable provisions of its Local Assistance Procedure Manual (LAPM). The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation and supporting studies reviewed and approved by Caltrans include:
• Preliminary Environmental Study (approved December 12, 2019); • Traffic Study (approved June 20, 2020);
• Natural Environment Study-Minimal Effects (approved September 23, 2000); • Noise Technical Memorandum (approved February 24, 2021); • Historic Property Survey Report (approved May 24, 2021); • Categorical Exclusion (approved August 18, 2021)
The location of the 12” EVMWD was based on the ATLAS information provided by EVMWD in June 2019. Since information identified this line along the existing right of way, it was concluded to be out of the project impact area and no relocation of the line was anticipated. As the project is refined and new information is subsequently made available, the City will coordinate directly with the utility providers to ensure the appropriate relocation of facilities per the applicable provisions of the respective utility. This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact. No revision or recirculation of the IS/MND is warranted.

Response to Comment 4: The 20-day review period detailed in the IS/MND was a typographical error.

As detailed in the Notice of Intent (NOI), which included an active City maintained weblink hosting the IS/MND and supporting technical studies, “Comments will be received from July 19, 2021 to August 18, 2021 (30-day public review).”

7.d
Packet Pg. 1732 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC C OMMENTS

I NITIAL S TUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OCTOBER 2021

APPENDIX H

B ARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
H-7
As evidenced by the commenter’s own comment letter, the NOI was distributed per the City’s appropriate agencies for public comment. The minor error recognized by the commenter, did not limit appropriate public comment. The oversight does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

No revision and/or recirculation of the IS/MND is warranted.

Response to Comment 5: The commenter’s concern regarding use of EVMWD property is noted.

There is currently 33 feet of right-of-way centerline of Barton Road and the EVMWD property. At t this time, the project anticipates requesting for a 10-foot wide temporary construction easement along this property. It is reasonable to conclude that the purchase of required right-of-way and/or granting of temporary construction easements will occur between the City and affected parties upon final design prior to construction. As is the typical procedure, terms and conditions of any temporary construction easement would be based on mutually agreed to terms between both parties.

This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 6: Curbing at the EVMWD parcel occurs only the extreme corner of the property. The Project has been designed to provide appropriate access to the EVMWD property from Barton Road.

This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 7: Please refer to the Response to Comment 1.

Based on plans provided by EVMWD, the referenced line is located within the project study area. The studies detailed in the Response to Comment 3, as well as other engineering studies, provide an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential environmental effects related to bridge demolition, roadway construction, and other activities in the project area. As EVMWD’s facility is located within the project area, it is reasonable to conclude that impacts associated with necessary utility relocation activities within the study area have been appropriately identified and addressed.

This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 8: Please refer to the Response to Comment 1. The location of the 12” EVMWD line was based on the ATLAS information provided by EVMWD in June 2019. Since this information identified this line along the existing right of way, it was concluded to be out of the project impact area and thus not potholed. Based on subsequently acquired information, the 12” EVMWD line is not affected by the project west of the existing bridge. As stated in the Response to Comment 1, approximately 450 feet of the existing waterline will need to be vertically relocated to maintain the minimum cover with the reconstructed roadway.

The IS/MND recognizes a requirement to relocate affected utility features to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements. The specifics of utility relocation; including the number, type,

7.d
Packet Pg. 1733 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC C OMMENTS

I NITIAL S TUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OCTOBER 2021

APPENDIX H

B ARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
H-8
location and nature of feature, is typically refined as the design of a project is advanced. Coordination between the City and affected parties includes the sharing of appropriate information (including asbuilt plans) to identify the specific relocation actions required. It is reasonable to conclude that this coordination will identify relocation criteria sufficient to provide appropriate continuity in service.

The commenter’s concerns will be considered by the City prior to any decision on the project. This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 9: While the acquisition of minor amounts of right-of-way is required for project implementation, this acquisition process cannot be started until after approval of the environmental document. Any acquisition action would be conducted pursuant to applicable Caltrans and City procedures. As adherence to these procedures is mandatory, it is reasonable to conclude the process will be completed in a manner allowing the full construction of the project as detailed in the IS/MND.

The commenter’s statement will be considered by the City prior to any decision on the project. This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 10: Table 2.2.A of the IS/MND has been revised to identify EVMWD facilities in the project area.

Table 2.2.A: On-site and Adjacent Land Uses
Direction Existing Land Use
General Plan
Designation
Zoning
Designation
Project Site Road/Bridge N/A N/A
North
(Colton)
Industrial Uses, Surface Parking Lots, Abandoned UPRR
tracks, SCE Easement
Light Industrial M-1 Light
Industrial
North
(Grand
Terrace)
Industrial Businesses, Surface Parking Lots, Inactive UPRR Corridor and SCE Easement
Industrial Restricted
Manufacturing
East (Grand
Terrace)
Residential units and Barton Road Industrial Restricted Manufacturing
South
(Colton)
Industrial/Commercial Uses, Surface Parking Lots,
Abandoned UPRR tracks, SCE Easement, EVMWD well &
discharge line
Light Industrial M-1 Light
Industrial
South
(Grand
Terrace
Industrial/Commercial businesses, surface parking lot,
inactive UPRR corridor and SCE easement, EVMWD
discharge line
Industrial Restricted
Manufacturing
West
(Colton)
Barton Road, Surface Parking Lots, and Terrace Avenue Light Industrial M-1 Light Industrial
The project will not impact EVMWD’s well house. As EVMWD’s 12” line is located within the project footprint, it is reasonable to conclude that impacts associated with necessary utility relocation activities within the study area have been appropriately identified and addressed.

7.d
Packet Pg. 1734 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC C OMMENTS

I NITIAL S TUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OCTOBER 2021

APPENDIX H

B ARTON ROAD BRIDGE REMOVAL AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION P ROJECT

C OLTON , C ALIFORNIA
H-9
This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact.

Response to Comment 11: Section 2.3 (Project Description) states, “The Project is being proposed to provide a safe connectivity between La Cadena and the Barton Road/Interstate-215 (I-215) interchange and to facilitate efficient access between the Cities of Colton and Grand Terrace.” As stated previously, the existing two lane bridge will be replaced with a two lane roadway. The Project does not increase travel lanes through the project area. Continuous pedestrian and bicycle access through the project area will be installed through the project area to meet the requirements of both Cities. While the project will improve vehicular and pedestrian safety through the project area, as the project replaces a two-lane bridge with a similar size facility, it will not increase total vehicle capacity through the project area. Furthermore, as the replacement roadway will be built at the same location and alignment as the current bridge, the project would not extend roadway infrastructure at a location or in a manner that would induce growth not previously projected by both Cities. Therefore, it is reasonable that it would not induce growth.

This comment does not raise any significant environmental issue, does not identify a new environmental impact, or increase the significance of a previously identified impact; therefore, no revision or recirculation of the IS/MND is required.

Response to Comment 12: The commenter again fails to acknowledge the long-standing intent of both Cities to replace a structurally deficient bridge with a roadway that provides safe transit through the project area, and incorrectly states the BRLCP is necessitating the Project. As stated previously, the project has a purpose and need separate and independent from any existing or proposed development in the project area.

Potential impacts resulting from the construction of the project have been appropriately identified in the IS/MND. Generally, construction-related impacts are limited in intensity and duration; therefore, the cumulative effects of the project were determined to be less than significant. At this time, it is speculative to determine which development activity in the project area will occur during project construction; therefore, requiring the road improvement project to assess such a cumulative condition is not appropriate.

As required under CEQA, adjacent planned or proposed development will be required to consider their cumulative contribution to local air quality, noise, and traffic impacts. As the project does not include a development component, and replaces an existing structure of similar size, it would not contribute to any cumulatively significant environmental impact identified by nearby planned or proposed developments.

7.d
Packet Pg. 1735 Attachment: Exhibit C_Part2 - Barton Road Bridge Removal ISMND (3479 : CEQA - Barton Road Bridge Removal and Road Construction ITEM NO. 8

STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: TOM CODY, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) ESSENTIAL WORKER

PAY FOR CITY OF COLTON PART-TIME EMPLOYEES,
RESOLUTION NO R-05-22.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

Approve and Adopt Resolution No. R-05-22 governing American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) essential premium pay for non-represented part-time employees who worked during the COVID19 Pandemic period of July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021.

BACKGROUND
In the past six months the City Council has approved new Memoranda of Understanding with seven employee associations as well as the City’s confidential and executive staff. A feature of these agreements has been a demonstration of the City’s appreciation for staff working during the time period of the COVID-19 pandemic from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. The City of Colton workforce initially went mainly remote between March 2020 and June 2020. As of July 2020, all City offices reopened and the City of Colton employees returned to their offices and duties. This included the part-time employees of the City of Colton who have historically provided crucial and valuable services to the community of Colton as well as the citywide organization.

The purpose of Resolution No. R-05-22 is a recognition of Colton’s part-time employee’s services during the pandemic and an expression of the City’s appreciation by extending to them one-time hazard pay premium afforded by the COVID-19 driven American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) dispensed by the Federal Department of Treasury. 8 Packet Pg. 1736
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Essential Worker Pay (ARPA) - Part-Time Employees
February 1, 2022

Page 2 ends

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The COVID-19 driven American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dispensed by the Federal Department of Treasury, in which the City of Colton was a recipient of approximately $14.8 million dollars, allows for premium pay to essential workers who work during the pandemic, including government workers providing essential municipal services. The City of Colton workforce returned to work in June 2020 and have continually been present back in office since that time providing essential services to city residents. The City currently has dispensed ARPA money to all full-time city employees less one employee association still engaged in negotiations. The following is proposed for the City’s part-time employees:
 Time Period of work performed: 7/1/20 – 6/30/21
 Total Number of Part-Time employees = 55 total P/T employees still active as of 1/7/2022
 $1,000 for employee working more than 500 hours = 40 employees = $40,000  $750 for employees working less than 500 hours = 13 employees = $9,750  $250 for employees working less than 100 hours = 2 employees = $500 Note: There are two part time staff that are CalPERS Retired Annuitants and do not qualify for this payment due to the CalPERS Retired Annuitant provision restrictions.

FISCAL IMPACTS
Approval of Resolution R-05-22 will increase appropriations in the City’s State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund by $50,880 in account number 219-1000-1000-1010-0000-000, which includes $50,250 for essential worker hazard pay premiums plus the City’s required portion of Medicare tax.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution R-05-22 2-1-22 final
8 Packet Pg. 1737
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
RESOLUTION NO. R-05-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON

AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN
ACT (ARPA) ESSENTIAL PREMIUM PAY FOR CITY OF COLTON NONREPRESENTATED PART-TIME EMPLOYEES WHO WORKED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2020 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2021
WHEREAS, The COVID-19 driven American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dispensed by the Federal Department of Treasury, in which the City of Colton was a recipient of approximately $14.8 million dollars, allows for premium pay to essential workers who worked during the pandemic, including government workers providing essential municipal services. The City of Colton workforce returned to work in June 2020 and have continuously been present back in the office since that time providing essential services to the city residents; and WHEREAS, This included part-time employees of the City of Colton who have historically provided crucial and valuable services to the community of Colton as well as the citywide organization.; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. R-05-22 is a recognition of Colton’s part-time employee’s services during the pandemic with an expression of the city’s appreciation by extending to them one-time monies afforded by the COVID-19 driven American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) dispensed by the Federal Department of Treasury; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Colton does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The following ARPA payment to part-time employee’s based on hours worked during the 2020/2021 fiscal years and are still actively employed with the City of Colton as follow:
 Time Period of work performed: 7/1/20 – 6/30/21
 $1,000 for employee working more than 500 hours

8.a
Packet Pg. 1738 Attachment: Resolution R-05-22 2-1-22 final (3468 : Essential Worker Pay (ARPA) - Part-Time Employees) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
- 2 -
 $750 for employees working less than 500 hours
 $250 for employees working less than 100 hours
Any City part-time CalPERS Retired Annuitants does not qualify for this payment due to the CalPERS Retired Annuitant provision restrictions.

SECTION 2: The City Manager is authorized to execute implementation of these MOU’s on the city’s behalf; and
SECTION 3: City Council hereby amends the City’s FY2021-22 adopted budget to increase appropriations by $50,880 in the City’s State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund in Account Number 219-1000-1000-1010-0000-000.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1
st day of February 2022:

City of Colton
FRANK J. NAVARRO, Mayor
ATTEST:

CAROLINA R. PADILLA, City Clerk

8.a
Packet Pg. 1739 Attachment: Resolution R-05-22 2-1-22 final (3468 : Essential Worker Pay (ARPA) - Part-Time Employees) ITEM NO. 9

STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: DEB FARRAR, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE

EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR GRANT FUNDING

THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING,
RESOLUTION NO. R-07-22.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1. Adopt Resolution No. R-7-22 authorizing the execution of an agreement for grant funding through the California Department of Aging.

2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 budget to reflect the receipt of an additional $200,000 in State Funding for Senior Center Facility Improvements.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all contracts necessary to proceed.

BACKGROUND
The Colton Community Services Department has historically provided a robust program for those ages 50 + through activities held at the Hutton Community Center. These programs included weekday meal service, social connection activities, fitness and special events. With the onset of COVID, the Hutton Community Center programing has been restricted to weekly meal deliveries, limited outdoor activities, and a few drive-thru pick up events. The lack of long-term socialization has heavily impacted the mental health of our senior population.

The Office of Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes requested new proposals for the upcoming State budget. The Community Services Department requested $150,000 for improvements to the Hutton Community Center’s outdoor patio to expand our ability to provide 9 Packet Pg. 1740
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Grant - California Department of Aging
February 1, 2022

Page 2 ends

safe activities for those 50 and better. The outdoor patio is located behind the center and is fully fenced with interior and exterior entrances. In its current form, the patio is a very simple, unfinished shade structure, but with additional upgrades, the patio can be used to offer significantly more programing. During the State budget process, Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes was able to allocate, $200,000 in state funding improve the Hutton Community Center.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
As we transition to a post COVID world, one of the opportunities to provide safe activities is through the Hutton Community Center’s outdoor patio. In the short term, it will combat the effects of COVID by providing a place for safe socialization as a balm for the depression and loneliness. In the long term, it will improve lives of seniors for a long time to come as a space for outdoor activities and programing such as senior sports, outdoor dances and daily exercise classes. The additional $200,000 in funding will include upgrades such as:
• Level surrounding grass and dirt areas and install artificial turf grass or cement so area can be safely used for activities & programing.
• Installation of an outdoor kitchen and cooking space. • Expansion of patio space to the recreation and dance rooms with exterior access. • Purchase of Patio furnishings and activity equipment.

This resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute this agreement with the state and amend the budget to reflect the grant funding.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The total grant funding equals $200,000 and is reimbursable to the City for allowable expenditures in accordance with the grant documentation and guidelines.

In order to account for this grant funding, to amend the FY 2021-22 budget to increase revenue in Miscellaneous Grants Fund Revenue Account Number 225-5850-022 in the amount of $200,000 and increase appropriations by $200,000 in Miscellaneous Grants Fund Capital Improvement Account Number 225-6200-6233-3890-0000-022.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. R-07-22 HCC Patio Grant

2. City of Colton Funding Letter
9 Packet Pg. 1741
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
RESOLUTION NO. R-07-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON

APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRANT TO IMPROVE THE HUTTON CENTER PATIO AND AMEND THE FY 2021-2022 BUDGET.

WHEREAS, the State Department of Aging has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of a grant to the City of Colton, setting up necessary procedures governing the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete project(s), currently funded at $200,000 for the Hutton Center Patio Improvement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby:

Section 1

1. Approves the filing of project application(s) for specified grant project(s); and

2. Certifies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing specified grant funds, has sufficient funds, including those provided by this grant, to complete the project; and

3. Certifies that the applicant has or will provide sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s), and

4. Delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, which may be necessary for the completion of the grant scope(s); and

5. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines.

Section 2: To amend the FY2021-22 budget to increase revenue and appropriations in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund in amounts and accounts listed below:

REVENUE
225-5850-0220 $200,000

EXPENDITURE
225-6200-6233-3890-0000-022 Capital Improvement $200,000 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1
st day of February 2022.
________________________________________
FRANK J, NAVARRO, Mayor
ATTEST:

CAROLINA R. PADILLA, City Clerk

9.a
Packet Pg. 1742 Attachment: R-07-22 HCC Patio Grant (3439 : Grant - California Department of Aging) STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM Governor

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING
Division of Administrative Services
Financial Management Branch
2880 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
www.aging.ca.gov
TEL 916-419-7500
FAX 916-928-2267
TTY1-800-735-2929
January 3, 2022
Attn: Heidi Strutz
City of Colton, Hutton Senior Center
650 N La Cadena Dr
Colton CA 92324-2823
To Whom It May Concern,
Attached you will find a check (warrant number 60-540318) for funds being distributed to your agency per the fiscal year 2021-22 Budget Act.

This disbursement is being made in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 129, Section 141, Item 4170- 101-0001, Provision 4, Subitem (a) of the 2021-22 Budget Act which provides that the City of Colton Hutton Senior Center will receive $200,000 for the purpose of supporting the senior center’s patio upgrades and requires that the Hutton Senior Center provide a report to the California Department of Aging (CDA) describing how the funds are used (see attached provisional language).

As an attachment to this memorandum, a reporting template has been included for your use (see attached template). CDA will also provide you with an electronic version. Please provide the completed template to CDA no later than July 31st, 2022. If funds are not fully expended, the department is requiring an annual, updated template describing how the funds are used on July 31st of each year.

If you have any questions regarding this funding distribution, please contact Nicole Shimosaka, Chief Financial Officer, at [email protected] or (916) 419-7520.

Thank you,
THOMAS D. CAMERON
Deputy Director
Division of Administrative Services
California Department of Aging

9.b
Packet Pg. 1743 Attachment: City of Colton Funding Letter (3439 : Grant - California Department of Aging) ITEM NO. 10

STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: ARTHUR MORGAN, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MGR
SUBJECT: SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2022 FOR CDBG 2022 - 2023 PROJECTS.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing date for February 15, 2022 for prioritization of Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant Funds

BACKGROUND
Since the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) program’s inception in 1974, it has provided financial assistance to grantees for a variety of community development purposes. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) uses a formula to calculate the grant amount for each metropolitan city, urban county and state. CDBG funds can be used to benefit low and moderate income residents by: building roads, parks, repairing or rehabilitating housing in target areas, by providing new or increased public services to income-qualifying residents, or by funding initiatives that generate new jobs. The County of San Bernardino’s Community Development and Housing Department (“CDH”) currently provides project oversight for CDBG projects through the Urban County program, in which Colton is a partner and joint recipient.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
In the fall of 2021, staff was advised by CDH that the submittal deadline for all CDBG proposals for fiscal year 2022-2023 funds was December 14, 2021. Those proposals were analyzed by CDH for eligibility. Eligible project proposals serving Colton residents were forwarded back to the City on January 14, 2022, for further processing. On January 25, 2022, the CDBG Ad Hoc 10 Packet Pg. 1744
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Set Public Hearing - CDBG 2022-2023 Projects
February 1, 2022

Page 2 ends

Committee met to finalize project recommendations to be presented to the City Council on February 15, 2022. Final funding recommendations are due back to the County by February 28, 2022.

Staff requests Council set a public hearing date for February 15, 2022, to consider and establish their fiscal year 2022-2023 final funding recommendations. Eligible projects recommended for funding will be available for public review beginning February 2, 2022, at the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 650 N. La Cadena Drive, in Colton. There is a total of $417,684 in CDBG funds available to Colton for fiscal year 2021-2022.

The County of San Bernardino will then publish all projects countywide, all prioritized and approved projects from its participating cities as required by HUD, prior to adoption of the Consolidated Plan.

FISCAL IMPACTS
CDBG Funded projects completed by the City are 100% reimbursable, up to the approved project limit. Funded capital improvement projects will be included in the 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Program, and will be included in the City’s budget. Funded Public Service Projects will be included in the City’s budget by the Community Services Department.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT

1. Public Hearing Notice for CDBG
10 Packet Pg. 1745

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the public that the City Council of the City of Colton will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, located at 650 North La Cadena Drive, on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2022 at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following actions:

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROJECT
PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
CDBG FUNDS.

Copies of project proposals eligible and those recommended for funding are available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk at 650 North La Cadena Drive, Colton, California.

The open session of the City Council begins at 6:00 P.M. that evening in the Council Chambers located at 650 North La Cadena Drive.

If you challenge the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Dated: _____________________, 2022
/s/
________________________________
CAROLINA R. PADILLA
City Clerk
City of Colton

10.a
Packet Pg. 1746 Attachment: Public Hearing Notice for CDBG (3484 : Set Public Hearing - CDBG 2022-2023 Projects) ITEM NO. 11

STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: MARK TOMICH, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING, AND APPROVE SECOND READING OF

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

COLTON, APPROVING THE BARTON ROAD LOGISTICS CENTER

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 21700 BARTON ROAD AND 275, 280 AND 375 DE
BERRY STREET IN THE CITY OF COLTON, ORDINANCE NO. O03-22.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

It is Recommended that the City Council Waive Full Reading, and Approve Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Colton, Approving The Barton Road Logistics Center Development Agreement For Property Generally Located At 21700 Barton Road And 275, 280 And 375 De Berry Street In The City Of Colton.

ATTACHMENT

1. Ordinance No. O-03-22
11 Packet Pg. 1747
7 8
11 13
14 19
20 21
1 ORDINANCE NO. O-03-22
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF COLTON APPROVING THE BARTON ROAD
3 LOGISTICS CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 21700
4 BARTON ROAD AND 275, 280 AND 375 DE BERRY
5 STREEET IN THE CITY OF COLTON
WHEREAS, the City of Colton (“City”) has found that development 6 agreements will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning by providing a greater degree of certainty in that process, reduce the economic costs of development, allow for the orderly planning of public improvements and services, allocate costs to achieve maximum utilization of public and private resources in the development process, and ensure 9 that appropriate measures to enhance and protect the environment are achieved; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. 10 and Colton Municipal Code Section 18.58.102, the City is authorized to enter into development agreements providing for the development of land under terms and conditions set forth therein; and
12 WHEREAS, Pacific West Management, a California general partnership, The Robert J. Neal and Bernarda A. Neal Revocable Trust, and Producer Industrial Partners, LLC, a California limited liability company ( “Developer”) proposes to develop the Barton Road Logistics Center (Case No. DAP-001-602), more particularly described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference 15 (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Colton approved the Architectural & Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map to provide for the orderly growth and quality development of the Project in accordance with the General Plan; and
18 WHEREAS, because of the logistics, magnitude of the expenditure and considerable lead time prerequisite to planning and developing the Project, Developer has proposed to enter into a development agreement concerning the Project (“Development Agreement”) to provide assurances that the Project can proceed without disruption caused by a change in the City's planning policies and requirements except as provided in the Development Agreement, which assurance will thereby reduce the actual or perceived risk of planning for and proceeding with 22 development of the Project; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held on September 14, 2021, the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission considered the Staff Report, the Development Agreement, all recommendations by staff, and public testimony, and adopted Resolution No. R-29-21, recommending to the City Council approval of the 25 Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City desires the timely, efficient, orderly and proper development of the Project in furtherance of the goals and policies of the City’s 27 General Plan; and
28 WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this Development Agreement is 16 17
23 24
26 11.a
Packet Pg. 1748 Attachment: Ordinance No. O-03-22 (3487 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-03-22)

Page 2 ends

4 1 consistent with the City’s General Plan; and
2 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that by entering into the Development Agreement: (i) the City will promote orderly growth and quality 3 development on the Property in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan; (ii) significant benefits will be created for City residents and the 4 public generally from increased employment, property tax revenue, and contributions from Developer toward public capital improvements; and 5 WHEREAS, the City and Developer have reached mutual agreement and 6 desire to voluntarily enter into the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to conditions and requirements set for therein; 7 and
8 WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing on the Development Agreement; and
9 WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the City Council considered the Staff 10 Report, the Development Agreement, and public testimony. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
12 COLTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
13 Section 1. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65865, the City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 14 "A", entitled "A Development Agreement between City of Colton and Pacific West Management, a California general partnership, The Robert J. Neal and Bernarda A. 15 Neal Revocable Trust, and Producer Industrial Partners, LLC, a California limited liability company” (aka “Barton Road Logistics Center Development Agreement”) 16 (the "Development Agreement").
17 Section 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds this Development Agreement not 18 be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community because the Development Agreement will permit land uses that best reflect community needs, 19 including the need for local employment opportunities and increased property tax revenue to fund City services, and will allow for the most efficient and logical 20 development of the real property governed by the Development Agreement in the City.
21 Section 3. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867.5(b), and 22 based on the entire record before the City Council, including all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council hereby finds that the Development Agreement 23 is consistent with the General Plan because the Development Agreement will result in the development of the Property that is consistent with the uses and intensity 24 allowed under the General Plan.
25 Section 4. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds that: (i) the economic 26 interests of Colton citizens and the public health, safety and welfare will be best served by entering into the Development Agreement; (ii) this Development 27 Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the area in which the Property is located; (iii) the Development Agreement is in 28 conformity with the public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice;

11.a
Packet Pg. 1749 Attachment: Ordinance No. O-03-22 (3487 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-03-22)

Page 3 ends

4 1 and (iv) the Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development or the preservation of property values for the property it governs or 2 any other property.
3 The City Council further finds that among the public benefits to accrue to the residents of the City as a result of the Development Agreement are: (a) A Capital 4 Contribution of $10 million toward the design and construction of Barton Road bridge and roadway improvements over the BNSF Railroad right-of-way; (b) Four 5 public access electric vehicle charging stalls; and (c) Two rooftop soar array systems. 6 Section 5. All procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”) have be met by Planning 7 Commission approval of Resolution R-27-21, adopting environmental findings pursuant to CEQA, adopting a statement of overriding considerations, certifying the 8 Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #202029049), and adopting a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the Barton Road Logistics Center. The City 9 Council affirms the Planning Commission’s adoption of Resolution R-27-21 and finding that, per Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 10 15162 that no new or more severe impacts have been identified relating to the Development Agreement that require any additional environmental review. 11 12 Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Pursuant to Government Code 13 section 65868.5, within 10 days following the entering of the Development 14 Agreement, as evidence by the full execution thereof, the City Clerk shall record the Development Agreement with the San Bernardino County Recorder. 15 16 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2022. 17 18
19 FRANK J. NAVARRO
20 ATTEST:
21 22
CAROLINA R. PADILLA
23 City Clerk
24 25
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
26 27
28 Best Best & Krieger LLP
Mayor

11.a
Packet Pg. 1750 Attachment: Ordinance No. O-03-22 (3487 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-03-22) Page
4 of
4 1 City Attorney 23456789
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 11.a
Packet Pg. 1751 Attachment: Ordinance No. O-03-22 (3487 : Second Reading of Ordinance No. O-03-22) ITEM NO. 12

STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: BILL SMITH, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: APPROVE TOLLING AGREEMENT EXTENSION BETWEEN CITY

OF COLTON, SUNMEADOWS LLC AND THE COLTON COALITION
(CADENA CREEK MOBILE HOME PARK).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

Authorize the City Manager to execute necessary extensions to the existing Tolling Agreement between the City of Colton, Sunmeadows LLC and the Colton Coalition for the Environment, regarding the Roquet Ranch Specific Plan entitlements, to extend the term of the Agreement to February 1, 2022, and also authorize the City Manager to execute extensions for up to six months – to August 3, 2022.

BACKGROUND
On May 15, 2018, the City Council adopted an environmental impact report (EIR), mitigation monitoring and reporting program and general plan amendment for the Roquet Ranch development. Other entitlements (Specific Plan & Zone Change) were adopted at the Council’s next meeting (2d reading of ordinances) (collectively the “Project).

As part of the record of proceedings for the Project, the EIR included letters submitted by interested parties making comments and expressing concerns about the Project and/or its environmental impacts. One such letter was submitted by attorneys representing ownership interests in the Cadena Creek Mobilehome Park and the Colton Coalition for the Environment (“Coalition”). The letter expressed concerns that the EIR did not adequately study hydrology, water and aesthetic impacts on the Cadena Creek Mobilehome Park. Although staff provided responses to each of the concerns and the Project was ultimately approved, the .Coalition threatened to file a lawsuit.
12 Packet Pg. 1752
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Tolling Agreement Extension - Roque Ranch Entitlements
February 1, 2022

Page 2 ends

Subsequent to Project approval, the Coalition and the developer have expressed an interest in discussing ways to address the concerns of the Coalition without the need for a lawsuit. These discussions have led to the development of a draft settlement agreement that is currently under review by all of the parties. The settlement agreement will contemplate minor project changes to drainage and landscaping improvements. The current tolling agreement expires on January 31, 2022.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS
A tolling agreement is an agreement to waive a right to claim that litigation should be dismissed due to the expiration of a statute of limitations. Its purpose is typically to allow parties additional time to assess and determine the legitimacy and viability of claims without the necessity of filing a lawsuit. The tolling agreement entered into by the City of Colton, the developer (Sunmeadows LLC) and the Colton Coalition for the Environment for the Project is set to expire on January 31, 2022. However, due to recent COVID-19 precautions having made meetings less frequent, authorization for additional extensions is necessary in order to allow the parties to continue to discuss the Project and draft settlement agreement. Therefore, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize a 30-day extension, to March 2 2022, and authorize the City Manager to execute further extensions, for up to six months, to August 3, 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Prior environmental impact report certified by City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
12 Packet Pg. 1753

Colton City CouncilFebruary 1, 2022

Colton City Council
February 1, 2022