Concord City Council
April 12, 2022

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 162 17 112 367 200 64 925 64 68 494 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 162 17 112 367 200 64 925 64 68 494 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 174 10 120 395 44 69 995 64 73 531 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 73 472 27 146 638 276 119 2698 173 121 1961 872 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.56 0.56 0.14 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3382 193 1767 3526 1526 1767 4859 312 1767 3526 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 90 94 120 395 44 69 691 368 73 531 6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1812 1767 1763 1526 1767 1689 1794 1767 1763 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 5.6 5.6 8.0 12.4 2.9 4.5 13.7 13.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 5.6 5.6 8.0 12.4 2.9 4.5 13.7 13.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 73 246 253 146 638 276 119 1875 996 121 1961 872 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.82 0.62 0.16 0.58 0.37 0.37 0.60 0.27 0.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 177 477 491 236 1072 464 236 1875 996 236 1961 872 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.99 0.99 0.99 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.9 46.8 46.8 54.2 45.3 41.4 54.3 14.9 14.9 50.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.9 0.9 5.2 1.0 0.3 1.5 0.0 0.1 1.8 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 2.5 2.6 3.8 5.5 1.1 2.1 5.2 5.5 2.0 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.9 47.7 47.7 59.4 46.3 41.7 55.7 15.0 15.0 52.0 0.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D E D D E B B D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 208 559 1128 610
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.8 48.8 17.5 6.5
Approach LOS D D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.9 22.3 12.1 71.7 9.0 27.2 12.2 71.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 32.5 16.0 37.0 12.0 36.5 16.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s10.0 7.6 6.5 2.0 3.6 14.4 6.7 15.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.7 0.0 5.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.4
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 214 581 361 96 679 0 0 583 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 214 581 361 96 679 0 0 583 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 233 632 229 104 738 0 0 634 22
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2
Cap, veh/h 357 1024 309 167 2485 0 0 3111 946
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 5106 1539 3456 3647 0 0 5274 1552
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 233 632 229 104 738 0 0 634 22
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1539 1728 1777 0 0 1702 1552 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.4 13.6 16.8 3.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.4 13.6 16.8 3.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 357 1024 309 167 2485 0 0 3111 946 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.62 0.74 0.62 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 564 1617 487 605 2485 0 0 3111 946 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.1 43.8 45.0 56.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.2 1.3 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.4 5.7 6.5 1.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.9 44.0 46.4 57.4 6.9 0.0 0.0 4.9 4.5 LnGrp LOS D D D E A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1094 842 656
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.7 13.1 4.9
Approach LOS D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.8 79.1 30.1 89.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s21.0 44.0 38.0 70.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.5 5.4 18.8 11.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 5.1 3.7 6.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.4
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th AWSC
1: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 1 38 6 1 189
Future Vol, veh/h 8 1 38 6 1 189
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 9 1 43 7 1 215
Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.4 8.4

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 89% 1%
Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 99%
Vol Right, % 14% 11% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 44 9 190
LT Vol 0 8 1
Through Vol 38 0 189
RT Vol 6 1 0
Lane Flow Rate 50 10 216
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.057 0.013 0.242
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.081 4.672 4.041
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 872 771 890
Service Time 2.132 2.672 2.06
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.013 0.243
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.7 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0 0.9

HCM 6th AWSC
2: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 0 45 5 0 205
Future Vol, veh/h 21 0 45 5 0 205
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 25 0 53 6 0 241
Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach RightSB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 8 7.5 8.6

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 90% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 50 21 205
LT Vol 0 21 0
Through Vol 45 0 205
RT Vol 5 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 59 25 241
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.068 0.033 0.272
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.132 4.821 4.055
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 858 747 883
Service Time 2.203 2.821 2.091
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 0.033 0.273
HCM Control Delay 7.5 8 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.1 1.1

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 877 583 182 1376 679 193
Future Volume (veh/h) 877 583 182 1376 679 193
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 904 0 188 1419 700 48
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 2707 212 3466 829 380
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.00 0.12 0.68 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 5233 1572 1767 5233 3428 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 904 0 188 1419 700 48
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1689 1572 1767 1689 1714 1572
Q Serve(g_s), s 13.7 0.0 14.1 16.6 26.3 3.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.7 0.0 14.1 16.6 26.3 3.2
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2707 212 3466 829 380
V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.89 0.41 0.84 0.13
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2707 262 3466 1244 571
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.70 0.70
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 58.5 9.4 48.8 40.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 20.4 0.1 3.1 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.3 0.0 7.4 5.6 11.5 1.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.1 0.0 78.9 9.5 51.9 40.2
LnGrp LOS B E A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 904 A 1607 748
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.1 17.6 51.1
Approach LOS B B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s20.2 77.1 37.6 97.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 52.0 49.0 76.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s16.1 15.7 28.3 18.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.1 4.4 21.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 393 117 105 25 39 31 166 396 26 23 525 238 Future Volume (veh/h) 393 117 105 25 39 31 166 396 26 23 525 238 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 405 121 13 26 40 2 171 408 24 24 541 142 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 330 193 162 49 120 6 196 3470 202 47 2200 954 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1856 1563 1767 3418 170 1767 4896 285 1767 3526 1528 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 405 121 13 26 20 22 171 280 152 24 541 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1856 1563 1767 1763 1825 1767 1689 1804 1767 1763 1528 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.6 3.6 1.8 9.2 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.6 3.6 1.8 9.2 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 193 162 49 62 64 196 2394 1279 47 2200 954 V/C Ratio(X) 1.23 0.63 0.08 0.53 0.33 0.33 0.87 0.12 0.12 0.51 0.25 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 357 301 484 653 676 327 2394 1279 144 2200 954 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.0 58.0 54.7 64.8 63.6 63.6 59.1 6.2 6.3 64.9 11.3 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 125.9 1.3 0.1 3.3 1.1 1.1 6.8 0.1 0.2 2.4 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln11.4 4.0 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.7 6.1 1.2 1.4 0.8 3.6 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 186.9 59.2 54.7 68.1 64.7 64.7 65.8 6.3 6.4 67.3 11.5 10.8 LnGrp LOS F E D E E E E A A E B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 539 68 603 707
Approach Delay, s/veh 155.1 66.0 23.2 13.2
Approach LOS F E C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.6 100.7 17.0 9.8 19.0 89.3 7.7 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.0 43.0 13.0 50.0 25.0 29.0 37.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.8 5.6 15.0 3.6 14.9 11.2 4.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 5.2 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 58.1
HCM 6th LOS E

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 984 70 120 1407 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 984 70 120 1407 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 1025 0 125 1466 6 140 0 0 5 7 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 43 3454 147 3858 16 234 0 18 26 0
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.68 0.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 5233 0 1767 5207 21 3534 0 1572 757 1060 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 1025 0 125 951 521 140 0 0 12 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 0 1767 1689 1852 1767 0 1572 1818 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 10.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 10.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.42 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 43 3454 147 2502 1372 234 0 44 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.30 0.85 0.38 0.38 0.60 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 3454 209 2502 1372 288 0 431 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 64.8 8.6 0.0 55.5 0.0 0.0 61.3 0.0 0.0 64.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.2 0.0 13.8 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 3.7 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.3 8.8 0.0 69.2 0.1 0.2 62.2 0.0 0.0 65.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A E A A E A E A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1039 A 1597 140 A 12
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 5.6 62.2 65.9
Approach LOS A A E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s15.2 97.6 14.0 7.3 105.5 8.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 56.5 11.0 22.0 50.5 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s11.3 12.9 7.2 3.1 2.0 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.4 0.1 0.0 20.5 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 922 60 149 1320 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 922 60 149 1320 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 960 59 155 1375 0 122 21 24 36 12 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 110 3325 204 178 3648 196 205 171 187 205 171 Arrive On Green 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4879 299 1767 5066 1572 1360 1856 1547 1331 1856 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 664 355 155 1375 0 122 21 24 36 12 8 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1801 1767 1689 1572 1360 1856 1547 1331 1856 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 11.9 1.4 1.9 3.4 0.8 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 12.7 1.4 1.9 4.8 0.8 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2301 1227 178 3648 196 205 171 187 205 171 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.29 0.29 0.87 0.38 0.62 0.10 0.14 0.19 0.06 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 236 2301 1227 367 3648 398 481 401 385 481 401 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.7 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.0 54.2 56.2 53.8 53.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.2 4.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.3 0.0 0.1 4.8 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.0 0.1 0.2 57.8 0.3 0.0 60.6 54.1 54.4 56.3 53.8 53.7 LnGrp LOS E A A E A E D D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1090 1530 A 167 56
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 6.1 58.9 55.4
Approach LOS A A E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.4 102.7 19.9 17.6 97.5 19.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.0 67.5 35.0 28.0 57.5 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.2 2.0 14.7 13.5 2.0 6.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 21.3 0.3 0.2 12.2 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 1183 4 8 1410 82 12 0 34 77 2 74 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 1183 4 8 1410 82 12 0 34 77 2 74 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 1245 3 8 1484 66 13 0 2 81 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 93 4017 1219 34 3848 1169 164 0 126 153 149 126 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.79 0.79 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 5066 1537 1767 5066 1539 1381 0 1572 1404 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 1245 3 8 1484 66 13 0 2 81 2 4
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1537 1767 1689 1539 1381 0 1572 1404 1856 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 9.1 0.1 0.6 13.4 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.2 7.7 0.1 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 9.1 0.1 0.6 13.4 1.5 1.3 0.0 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 4017 1219 34 3848 1169 164 0 126 153 149 126 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.31 0.00 0.24 0.39 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.01 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 4017 1219 157 3848 1169 487 0 489 477 577 489 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.7 3.8 2.9 65.2 5.5 4.1 57.7 0.0 57.2 61.9 57.1 57.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.1 2.5 0.0 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.8 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.5 3.9 2.9 66.4 5.8 4.2 57.8 0.0 57.2 62.9 57.2 57.3 LnGrp LOS E A A E A A E A E E E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1281 1558 15 87
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 6.0 57.7 62.5
Approach LOS A A E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.1 108.0 15.9 6.6 112.6 15.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.0 66.5 42.0 12.0 66.5 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.4 15.4 3.3 2.6 11.1 11.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 17.5 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7
HCM 6th LOS A

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 33 1268 53 21 1304 21 81 0 51 64 0 189 Future Volume (veh/h) 33 1268 53 21 1304 21 81 0 51 64 0 189 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 0 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 1363 56 23 1402 23 87 0 1 69 0 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 3
Cap, veh/h 67 1700 70 847 4033 66 115 0 0 211 0 0
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.48 0.79 0.79 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4990 205 1767 5133 84 1767 87 3428 69 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 922 497 23 922 503 87 71.5 69 61.0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1818 1767 1689 1840 1767 E 1714 E Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 33.4 33.4 0.9 10.9 10.9 6.5 2.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 33.4 33.4 0.9 10.9 10.9 6.5 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 67 1151 620 847 2653 1446 115 211 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.80 0.80 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.75 0.33
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 353 1151 620 847 2653 1446 648 1244 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 63.7 40.4 40.4 18.6 4.3 4.3 62.0 60.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 5.7 10.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 9.5 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 14.5 16.3 0.4 3.0 3.3 3.2 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.0 46.1 50.5 18.6 4.3 4.4 71.5 61.0 LnGrp LOS E D D B A A E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1454 1448
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.1 4.6
Approach LOS D A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s70.2 51.5 13.3 10.1 111.6 13.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 5.5 4.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s25.0 * 46 49.5 27.0 43.5 49.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.9 35.4 8.5 4.6 12.9 4.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 11.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 1295 17 7 1241 3 16 0 35 5 1 4
Future Volume (vph) 5 1295 17 7 1241 3 16 0 35 5 1 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.98
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5075 1770 5084 1664 1719
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.89 0.89
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5075 1770 5084 1506 1575
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1363 18 7 1306 3 17 0 37 5 1 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 4 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1380 0 7 1309 0 0 3 0 0 6 0
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3
Permitted Phases 3 3
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 8.0 8.0
Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 8.0 8.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.65 0.04 0.65 0.06 0.06
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 52 3289 62 3325 89 93
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.27 0.00 c0.26
v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.00
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.42 0.11 0.39 0.04 0.07
Uniform Delay, d1 63.7 11.5 63.0 10.9 59.9 60.0
Progression Factor 1.34 0.49 0.74 0.09 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.4
Delay (s) 86.4 6.0 48.0 1.1 60.1 60.4
Level of Service F A D A E E
Approach Delay (s) 6.3 1.4 60.1 60.4
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 5.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.35
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 135.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 9 1323 3 10 1231 39 0 0 6 157 0 20 Future Volume (vph) 9 1323 3 10 1231 39 0 0 6 157 0 20
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 5034 1752 5013 0 1665 1630
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 5034 1752 5013 0 1665 1630
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 1393 3 11 1296 41 0 0 6 165 0 21
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1396 0 11 1336 0 0 0 0 94 92 0
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 0.0 14.2 14.2
Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 0.0 14.2 14.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.65 0.04 0.65 0.00 0.11 0.11
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 51 3262 62 3278 0 175 171
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.28 0.01 c0.27 c0.06 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.43 0.18 0.41 0.00 0.54 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 63.9 11.6 63.2 11.0 67.5 57.3 57.3
Progression Factor 1.46 0.03 0.88 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.4 1.7 0.1 0.0 4.0 4.1
Delay (s) 95.1 0.8 57.2 6.5 67.5 61.3 61.4
Level of Service F A E A E E E
Approach Delay (s) 1.4 6.9 67.5 61.3
Approach LOS A A E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 135.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1456 36 79 864 191 31 53 186 616 37 456 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1456 36 79 864 191 31 53 186 616 37 456 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1517 36 82 900 0 32 55 23 642 119 92 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 2626 62 125 3123 116 122 103 718 377 319
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 5253 121 1767 5233 0 1767 1856 1572 3534 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1007 546 82 900 0 32 55 23 642 119 92 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1689 1830 1767 1689 0 1767 1856 1572 1767 1856 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 11.2 0.0 2.3 3.9 1.9 23.9 7.4 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 11.2 0.0 2.3 3.9 1.9 23.9 7.4 6.7 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1743 945 125 3123 116 122 103 718 377 319 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.66 0.29 0.28 0.45 0.22 0.89 0.32 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1743 945 196 3123 170 179 151 969 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.1 12.1 0.0 60.0 60.7 59.8 52.4 45.8 45.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.3 2.3 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.4 7.0 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.3 0.6 2.8 4.0 0.0 1.1 1.9 0.8 11.1 3.4 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 1.3 2.3 63.3 12.1 0.0 60.5 61.7 60.2 59.4 46.0 45.7 LnGrp LOS A A A E B E E E E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1553 982 A 110 853
Approach Delay, s/veh 1.7 16.4 61.0 56.1
Approach LOS A B E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.5 75.2 13.9 88.7 32.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 50.5 13.0 69.5 37.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s8.1 2.0 5.9 13.2 25.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 22.3 0.1 10.9 1.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved changes to right turn type.

Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
13: Market St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1269 555 54 899 207 218 462 103 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1269 555 54 899 207 218 462 103 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1308 526 56 927 181 225 476 106
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 2230 888 115 4030 1115 667 558 123
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.72 0.72 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1412 1767 5567 1540 3428 2868 635 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1246 588 56 927 181 225 291 291
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1689 1578 1767 1856 1540 1714 1763 1740 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.4 5.0 7.6 21.5 21.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.4 5.0 7.6 21.5 21.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 2125 993 115 4030 1115 667 343 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.49 0.23 0.16 0.34 0.85 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 2125 993 209 4030 1115 927 477 470 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.9 6.2 5.8 46.9 52.5 52.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.8 1.7 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 7.6 8.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.2 0.5 1.9 2.7 1.5 3.3 10.2 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.8 1.7 62.1 6.2 5.9 47.0 60.1 61.0 LnGrp LOS A A A E A A D E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1834 1164 807
Approach Delay, s/veh 1.1 8.9 56.8
Approach LOS A A E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.8 90.5 31.8 103.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 67.5 36.5 87.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.1 2.0 23.8 9.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 35.6 2.3 14.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1330 32 28 956 0 0 0 0 48 17 180 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1330 32 28 956 0 0 0 0 48 17 180 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1415 33 30 1017 0 51 18 191
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 3507 82 47 3814 0 282 563 248
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.03 0.75 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 5257 119 1767 5233 0 1767 3526 1552
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 939 509 30 1017 0 51 18 191
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1689 1832 1767 1689 0 1767 1763 1552 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 14.4 14.4 2.0 7.4 0.0 3.0 0.5 14.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 14.4 14.4 2.0 7.4 0.0 3.0 0.5 14.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.06 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 2327 1262 47 3814 0 282 563 248 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.64 0.27 0.00 0.18 0.03 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 2327 1262 199 3814 0 560 1116 491 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.0 8.0 57.9 4.6 0.0 43.6 42.6 48.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.7 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 5.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 4.8 5.4 1.1 2.2 0.0 1.4 0.2 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.4 8.8 71.3 4.6 0.0 43.9 42.6 53.4 LnGrp LOS A A A E A A D D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1448 1047 260
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.5 50.8
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.7 88.2 24.2 95.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.5 53.5 38.0 71.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.0 16.4 16.2 9.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.0 0.9 9.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 1144 18 0 951 63 24 31 33 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 1144 18 0 951 63 24 31 33 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 1179 18 0 980 0 25 32 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 267 4226 65 0 3568 57 73 34
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 5140 78 0 5400 0 606 775 363
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 105 775 422 0 980 0 72 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1689 1841 0 1689 0 1744 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 6.6 6.6 0.0 8.9 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 6.6 6.6 0.0 8.9 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 267 2777 1514 0 3568 164 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.44 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 686 2777 1514 0 3568 279 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.96 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.8 2.6 2.6 0.0 6.8 0.0 53.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 1.6 1.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.1 2.8 3.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 54.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A A A A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1302 980 A 72
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.1 6.8 54.2
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 108.3 16.7 14.7 93.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 89.5 20.0 25.0 64.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 6.9 5.6 10.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.6 0.2 0.1 8.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 92 78 40 75 78 35 902 76 95 1003 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 92 78 40 75 78 35 902 76 95 1003 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 48 96 5 42 78 5 36 940 74 99 1045 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 226 305 246 163 318 21 103 3036 238 142 2315 1015 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 1268 1856 1498 687 1935 131 1767 4784 376 1767 3526 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 48 96 5 62 0 63 36 663 351 99 1045 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1268 1856 1498 1096 0 1657 1767 1689 1783 1767 1763 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 5.5 0.3 3.6 0.0 4.0 2.4 10.7 10.8 6.5 17.4 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.1 5.5 0.3 9.1 0.0 4.0 2.4 10.7 10.8 6.5 17.4 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.08 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 226 305 246 231 0 272 103 2143 1131 142 2315 1015 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.31 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.70 0.45 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 451 634 512 478 0 566 206 2143 1131 206 2315 1015 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.1 44.2 42.0 46.6 0.0 43.6 54.3 10.0 10.0 53.8 10.1 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 1.7 0.1 0.1 5.9 0.6 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.3 2.6 0.1 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.1 3.9 4.1 3.1 6.4 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.5 44.8 42.1 47.2 0.0 44.0 56.1 10.0 10.1 59.7 10.7 7.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D A D E B B E B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 149 125 1050 1203
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.6 45.6 11.6 14.5
Approach LOS D D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.0 84.3 24.7 13.6 81.7 24.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 50.5 41.0 14.0 50.5 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.4 19.4 11.1 8.5 12.8 10.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.0 0.7 0.1 8.4 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 601 70 70 244 214 99 708 173 243 829 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 601 70 70 244 214 99 708 173 243 829 36 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 620 65 72 252 50 102 730 147 251 855 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 125 760 80 121 826 362 128 1628 324 274 1651 730 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.31 0.94 0.94 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3210 336 1767 3526 1544 1767 4219 839 1767 3526 1558 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 340 345 72 252 50 102 583 294 251 855 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1783 1767 1763 1544 1767 1689 1681 1767 1763 1558 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 21.9 22.0 4.7 7.1 3.1 6.8 15.4 15.6 16.4 3.6 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 21.9 22.0 4.7 7.1 3.1 6.8 15.4 15.6 16.4 3.6 0.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 125 417 422 121 826 362 128 1303 648 274 1651 730 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.81 0.82 0.60 0.31 0.14 0.80 0.45 0.45 0.92 0.52 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 206 492 498 206 984 431 206 1303 648 353 1651 730 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.5 43.3 43.3 54.3 37.9 36.4 54.8 27.4 27.4 40.6 2.1 2.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 8.8 8.9 1.8 0.2 0.2 3.8 0.1 0.2 20.1 1.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.6 10.4 10.6 2.2 3.1 1.2 3.2 6.2 6.3 7.6 1.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.0 52.1 52.3 56.1 38.1 36.5 58.5 27.4 27.6 60.7 3.2 2.1 LnGrp LOS E D D E D D E C C E A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 771 374 979 1121
Approach Delay, s/veh 52.7 41.3 30.7 16.1
Approach LOS D D C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.2 33.9 12.7 61.2 12.5 33.6 22.6 51.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 33.5 14.0 40.0 14.0 33.5 24.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 24.0 8.8 5.6 7.7 9.1 18.4 17.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.0 4.6 0.0 1.8 0.2 3.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.1
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 171 432 308 127 696 0 0 911 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 171 432 308 127 696 0 0 911 43 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 186 470 199 138 757 0 0 990 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2
Cap, veh/h 321 920 277 196 2558 0 0 3173 965
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 5106 1536 3456 3647 0 0 5274 1552
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 186 470 199 138 757 0 0 990 26
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1536 1728 1777 0 0 1702 1552 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 10.0 14.6 4.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 10.0 14.6 4.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 321 920 277 196 2558 0 0 3173 965 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.51 0.72 0.70 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 653 1872 563 547 2558 0 0 3173 965 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 44.4 46.3 55.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.1 4.2 5.7 2.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.7 44.6 47.7 57.3 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D E A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 855 895 1016
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.5 14.0 0.2
Approach LOS D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.8 80.6 27.6 92.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 40.0 44.0 64.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 2.0 16.6 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 8.8 2.8 6.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.7
HCM 6th LOS B

HCM 6th AWSC
1: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 4 164 42 2 61
Future Vol, veh/h 25 4 164 42 2 61
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78
Heavy Vehicles, % 666666
Mvmt Flow 32 5 210 54 3 78
Number of Lanes 101001
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 8.1 8.7 7.8

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 86% 3%
Vol Thru, % 80% 0% 97%
Vol Right, % 20% 14% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 206 29 63
LT Vol 0 25 2
Through Vol 164 0 61
RT Vol 42 4 0
Lane Flow Rate 264 37 81
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.294 0.05 0.096
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.006 4.835 4.273
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 890 745 827
Service Time 2.06 2.835 2.358
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.297 0.05 0.098
HCM Control Delay 8.7 8.1 7.8
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 0.2 0.3

HCM 6th AWSC
2: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh10.6
Intersection LOS B
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 4 213 90 3 84
Future Vol, veh/h 75 4 213 90 3 84
Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73
Heavy Vehicles, % 7 77777
Mvmt Flow 103 5 292 123 4 115
Number of Lanes 1 01001
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach RightSB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 9.4 11.4 8.7

HCM LOS A B A

Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 95% 3%
Vol Thru, % 70% 0% 97%
Vol Right, % 30% 5% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 303 79 87
LT Vol 0 75 3
Through Vol 213 0 84
RT Vol 90 4 0
Lane Flow Rate 415 108 119
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.493 0.161 0.157
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.277 5.353 4.755
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 843 669 753
Service Time 2.3 3.398 2.789
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.492 0.161 0.158
HCM Control Delay 11.4 9.4 8.7
HCM Lane LOS B A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.8 0.6 0.6

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 725 370 182 872 218 167
Future Volume (veh/h) 725 370 182 872 218 167
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 788 0 198 948 237 33
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333
Cap, veh/h 3320 226 4137 343 157
Arrive On Green 0.66 0.00 0.13 0.82 0.10 0.10
Sat Flow, veh/h 5233 1572 1767 5233 3428 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 788 0 198 948 237 33
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1689 1572 1767 1689 1714 1572
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 13.2 5.1 8.0 2.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.0 13.2 5.1 8.0 2.3
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3320 226 4137 343 157
V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.88 0.23 0.69 0.21
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3320 353 4137 1086 498
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.86 0.86
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.4 0.0 51.4 2.5 52.2 49.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 9.0 0.0 3.0 0.8
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.6 0.0 6.3 1.1 3.6 0.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.6 0.0 60.3 2.5 55.3 50.4
LnGrp LOS A E A E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 788 A 1146 270
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 12.5 54.7
Approach LOS A B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s19.4 83.6 17.0 103.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s24.0 44.0 38.0 65.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s15.2 9.6 10.0 7.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 8.4 1.5 11.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 296 173 67 11 17 18 52 128 25 27 264 204 Future Volume (veh/h) 296 173 67 11 17 18 52 128 25 27 264 204 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 312 182 20 12 18 6 55 135 19 28 278 137 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 377 243 206 29 98 31 74 3028 410 54 2329 1033 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.03 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1856 1572 1767 2627 825 1767 4504 609 1767 3526 1564 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 312 182 20 12 12 12 55 100 54 28 278 137 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1856 1572 1767 1763 1689 1767 1689 1736 1767 1763 1564 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.7 11.3 1.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 3.7 1.2 1.3 1.9 3.5 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.7 11.3 1.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 3.7 1.2 1.3 1.9 3.5 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 377 243 206 29 66 63 74 2270 1167 54 2329 1033 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.75 0.10 0.41 0.18 0.19 0.74 0.04 0.05 0.52 0.12 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 495 419 457 690 662 147 2270 1167 147 2329 1033 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 50.3 45.9 58.4 56.0 56.0 56.8 6.6 6.7 57.3 7.5 7.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.2 1.8 0.1 3.4 0.5 0.6 5.3 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.1 5.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.5 52.0 46.0 61.9 56.4 56.6 62.2 6.7 6.7 59.8 7.6 7.8 LnGrp LOS E D D EEEEAAEAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 514 36 209 443
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.7 58.3 21.3 11.0
Approach LOS E E C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.6 85.7 17.2 9.5 9.0 84.3 6.0 20.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s10.0 29.0 16.0 47.0 10.0 29.0 31.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.9 3.3 12.7 2.8 5.7 5.9 2.8 13.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.6
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 786 98 103 983 5 69 4 60 0 1 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 786 98 103 983 5 69 4 60 0 1 2
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 873 100 114 1092 6 80 00010
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 31 3169 362 138 3888 21 247 0 0 5 0
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.69 0.69 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4611 526 1767 5198 29 3534 0 1572 0 1856 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 638 335 114 709 389 80 00010
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1760 1767 1689 1850 1767 0 1572 0 1856 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 8.7 8.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 8.7 8.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 2321 1210 138 2526 1384 247 0 0 5 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.83 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 265 2321 1210 265 2526 1384 324 0 0 495 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.2 7.2 7.2 49.9 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.3 0.5 4.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 2.9 3.1 3.2 0.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.1 7.5 7.8 54.4 0.1 0.2 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A A D A A D A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 982 1212 80 A 1
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 5.2 53.4 68.4
Approach LOS A A D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.4 88.0 13.4 6.1 95.3 5.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.0 39.5 11.0 18.0 39.5 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.5 10.8 4.6 2.6 2.0 2.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 713 60 201 1037 31 29 16 106 8 6 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 713 60 201 1037 31 29 16 106 8 6 25 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 820 64 231 1192 0 33 18 16 9 7 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 111 3164 246 256 3757 158 138 116 148 138 116 Arrive On Green 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4792 373 1767 5066 1572 1379 1856 1561 1354 1856 1561 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 577 307 231 1192 0 33 18 16 9 7 6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1788 1767 1689 1572 1379 1856 1561 1354 1856 1561 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 2.7 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 0.0 15.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 1.1 1.2 1.8 0.4 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 2229 1180 256 3757 158 138 116 148 138 116 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.26 0.26 0.90 0.32 0.21 0.13 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 206 2229 1180 471 3757 457 541 455 443 541 455 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 0.0 0.0 41.8 0.0 0.0 53.1 51.9 51.9 52.8 51.6 51.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.1 0.2 4.6 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 0.0 0.1 5.7 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.9 0.1 0.2 46.4 0.2 0.0 53.3 52.1 52.1 52.8 51.7 51.7 LnGrp LOS D A A D A DDDDDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 939 1423 A 67 22
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.1 7.7 52.7 52.1
Approach LOS A A D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.6 94.5 13.9 21.4 84.7 13.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 56.5 35.0 32.0 38.5 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.5 2.0 5.2 17.1 2.0 3.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 16.3 0.1 0.3 9.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 785 22 36 1259 44 0 0 0 15 0 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 785 22 36 1259 44 0 0 0 15 0 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 902 18 41 1447 37 0 0 0 17 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 79 3890 1206 110 3978 1209 0 91 77 146 91 77 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.77 0.77 0.06 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 5066 1570 1767 5066 1539 0 1856 1572 1756 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 902 18 41 1447 37 0 0 0 17 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1570 1767 1689 1539 0 1856 1572 1756 1856 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 6.0 0.3 2.7 10.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 6.0 0.3 2.7 10.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 79 3890 1206 110 3978 1209 0 91 77 146 91 77 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.23 0.01 0.37 0.36 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 177 3890 1206 206 3978 1209 0 649 550 675 649 550 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.5 3.9 3.3 54.0 3.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 1.6 0.1 1.2 2.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.2 4.0 3.3 54.7 4.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A A D AAAAADAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 943 1525 0 17
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 5.4 0.0 54.9
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.4 99.7 10.9 11.5 97.6 10.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.0 51.5 42.0 14.0 49.5 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.5 12.3 0.0 4.7 8.0 3.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 19.5 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.7
HCM 6th LOS A

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 216 520 85 51 1223 120 30 0 28 64 0 109 Future Volume (veh/h) 216 520 85 51 1223 120 30 0 28 64 0 109 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 0 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 254 612 92 60 1439 139 35 0 0 75 0 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333303303
Cap, veh/h 281 1488 221 819 3021 292 129 0 0 236 0 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.46 0.64 0.64 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4453 661 1767 4697 454 1767 35 3428 75 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 254 462 242 60 1035 543 35 53.7 75 53.5 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1737 1767 1689 1773 1767 D 1714 D Q Serve(g_s), s 16.9 12.7 12.9 2.3 18.9 18.9 2.2 2.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 12.7 12.9 2.3 18.9 18.9 2.2 2.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 281 1129 580 819 2172 1141 129 236 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.41 0.42 0.07 0.48 0.48 0.27 0.32
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 324 1129 580 819 2172 1141 655 1257 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.6 30.8 30.9 17.9 11.0 11.0 52.6 53.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.4 1.1 2.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln9.2 5.2 5.6 0.9 6.4 6.8 1.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 72.9 31.9 33.1 17.9 11.2 11.3 53.7 53.5 LnGrp LOS E C C B B B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 958 1638
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.1 11.5
Approach LOS D B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s61.1 45.6 13.3 24.1 82.7 13.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 5.5 4.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.9 * 40 44.5 22.0 38.5 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.3 14.9 4.2 18.9 20.9 4.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.5 0.1 0.1 9.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 38 533 22 22 1315 13 645402
Future Volume (vph) 38 533 22 22 1315 13 645402
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 8.0 5.0 8.0 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.95
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.97
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 5001 1752 5027 1729 1705
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.86 0.79
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 5001 1752 5027 1513 1392
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 579 24 24 1429 14 745402
RTOR Reduction (vph) 020000050060
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 601 0 24 1443 0 0 11 0000
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3
Permitted Phases 3 3
Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 76.8 9.6 79.7 4.3 4.3
Effective Green, g (s) 7.2 74.8 9.6 77.7 4.3 4.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.62 0.08 0.65 0.04 0.04
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 105 3117 140 3254 54 49
v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.12 0.01 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.19 0.17 0.44 0.21 0.00
Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 9.7 51.5 10.5 56.2 55.8
Progression Factor 1.11 1.45 0.57 0.09 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.1 0.7 0.1 1.9 0.0
Delay (s) 62.4 14.2 30.0 1.1 58.1 55.8
Level of Service E B C A E E
Approach Delay (s) 17.3 1.6 58.1 55.8
Approach LOS BAEE
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 6.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 25 517 0 31 1339 147 0 0 0 68 1 11 Future Volume (vph) 25 517 0 31 1339 147 0 0 0 68 1 11
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97
Satd. Flow (prot) 1736 4988 1736 4902 1649 1607
Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97
Satd. Flow (perm) 177 4988 1736 4902 1649 1607
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 562 0 34 1455 160 0 0 0 74 1 12
RTOR Reduction (vph) 000060000000
Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 562 0 34 1609 0 0 0 0 44 43 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Turn Type Perm NA Prot NA Split NA
Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4
Permitted Phases 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 76.8 76.8 9.6 79.7 8.8 8.8
Effective Green, g (s) 76.8 75.8 9.6 78.7 8.8 8.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.07 0.07
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 113 3150 138 3214 120 117
v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.02 c0.33 0.03 c0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0.15
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.18 0.25 0.50 0.37 0.37
Uniform Delay, d1 9.2 9.2 51.8 10.6 52.9 52.9
Progression Factor 0.25 0.11 0.71 0.39 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 0.1 1.1 0.1 2.6 2.7
Delay (s) 7.2 1.2 37.9 4.3 55.5 55.6
Level of Service A A D A E E
Approach Delay (s) 1.4 5.0 0.0 55.6
Approach LOS AAAE
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 6.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 580 35 76 891 140 19 30 72 670 96 653 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 580 35 76 891 140 19 30 72 670 96 653 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 652 33 85 1001 0 21 34 8 753 372 284 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 44444444444
Cap, veh/h 0 1934 97 137 2800 115 121 103 869 456 386
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.08 0.56 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 4802 219 1753 5191 0 1753 1841 1560 3506 1841 1558 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 414 271 85 1001 0 21 34 8 753 372 284 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1381 1800 1753 1675 0 1753 1841 1560 1753 1841 1558 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.8 2.8 5.6 13.2 0.0 1.4 2.1 0.6 24.7 22.9 20.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.8 2.8 5.6 13.2 0.0 1.4 2.1 0.6 24.7 22.9 20.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1230 802 137 2800 115 121 103 869 456 386 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.62 0.36 0.18 0.28 0.08 0.87 0.82 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1230 802 219 2800 190 199 169 1139 598 506 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 3.8 3.8 53.6 14.7 0.0 53.0 53.3 52.6 43.2 42.5 41.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.7 1.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.1 4.7 5.0 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.8 1.1 2.5 4.8 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.2 11.0 10.8 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 4.5 4.9 55.2 14.8 0.0 53.3 53.8 52.8 47.9 47.5 43.9 LnGrp LOS A AAEB DDDDDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 685 1086 A 63 1409
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.7 18.0 53.5 47.0
Approach LOS A B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.4 58.9 12.9 72.4 34.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 33.5 13.0 52.5 39.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.6 4.8 4.1 15.2 26.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.1 11.6 3.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved changes to right turn type.

Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
13: Market St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 662 480 66 963 349 144 311 63 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 662 480 66 963 349 144 311 63 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 752 431 75 1094 295 164 353 49
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 44444444
Cap, veh/h 54 2097 931 134 4229 1169 485 440 61
Arrive On Green 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.08 0.77 0.77 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 35 3197 1420 1753 5522 1526 3401 3088 425 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 407 362 431 75 1094 295 164 199 203 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1708 1524 1420 1753 1841 1526 1700 1749 1764 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 5.3 7.8 5.0 6.9 6.7 5.2 13.2 13.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.8 5.3 7.8 5.0 6.9 6.7 5.2 13.2 13.4 Prop In Lane 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1152 1000 931 134 4229 1169 485 249 252 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.36 0.46 0.56 0.26 0.25 0.34 0.80 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1152 1000 931 234 4229 1169 1034 532 537 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 2.9 3.0 3.1 53.5 4.1 4.1 46.3 49.8 49.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 2.2 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.2 5.9 6.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.6 3.8 4.4 54.7 4.1 4.2 46.5 52.0 52.2 LnGrp LOS A A A D A A D D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1200 1464 566
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 6.8 50.5
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.2 84.2 22.6 97.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 52.5 36.5 72.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.0 9.8 15.4 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 15.2 1.7 19.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 661 12 12 1132 0 0 0 0 57 22 235 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 661 12 12 1132 0 0 0 0 57 22 235 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 718 12 13 1230 0 62 24 255
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 44440 444
Cap, veh/h 0 3390 57 26 3609 0 341 680 301
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.72 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 5256 85 1753 5191 0 1753 3497 1548
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 472 258 13 1230 0 62 24 255
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1675 1825 1753 1675 0 1753 1749 1548 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 11.0 0.0 3.5 0.7 19.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 11.0 0.0 3.5 0.7 19.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.05 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 2231 1216 26 3609 0 341 680 301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.51 0.34 0.00 0.18 0.04 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 2231 1216 197 3609 0 555 1107 490 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.94 0.94 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 6.3 0.0 40.4 39.2 46.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 13.7 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 7.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 3.4 0.0 1.6 0.3 8.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 72.4 6.4 0.0 40.6 39.2 54.1 LnGrp LOS A AAEAA DDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 730 1243 341
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.1 7.1 50.6
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 85.4 28.3 91.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.5 53.5 38.0 71.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.9 2.0 21.1 13.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 1.1 12.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.3
HCM 6th LOS B

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 97 598 15 0 1122 56 977000
Future Volume (veh/h) 97 598 15 0 1122 56 977000
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1841 1841 0 1841 1841 1841 1841 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 108 664 16 0 1247 0 10 8 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 44044444
Cap, veh/h 276 4378 105 0 3742 45 36 0
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3401 5048 121 0 5356 0 995 796 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 108 440 240 0 1247 0 18 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1700 1675 1819 0 1675 0 1791 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 7.2 7.3 0.0 10.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 7.2 7.3 0.0 10.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 276 2906 1578 0 3742 81 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.33 0.22 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 567 2906 1578 0 3742 298 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.95 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.9 4.8 4.9 0.0 5.2 0.0 55.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.6 1.6 1.8 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.2 5.0 5.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D AAAA EAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 788 1247 A 18
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.7 5.3 55.8
Approach LOS B A E
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 109.6 10.4 14.7 94.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 89.5 20.0 20.0 64.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.3 3.2 5.7 12.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.9 0.0 0.1 12.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 20 21 33 46 41 14 1093 60 32 540 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 20 21 33 46 41 14 1093 60 32 540 30 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 22 0 35 49 10 15 1175 63 34 581 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 55555555555
Cap, veh/h 174 206 175 151 199 42 57 3432 184 98 2544 1134 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.71 0.71 0.06 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 1289 1826 1547 892 1765 375 1739 4836 259 1739 3469 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 11 22 0 52 0 42 15 807 431 34 581 23 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1289 1826 1547 1447 0 1584 1739 1662 1772 1739 1735 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 1.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.9 1.0 11.2 11.2 2.3 6.4 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 1.3 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.9 1.0 11.2 11.2 2.3 6.4 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.24 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 206 175 214 0 179 57 2358 1258 98 2544 1134 V/C Ratio(X) 0.06 0.11 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.23 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 469 624 529 547 0 541 188 2358 1258 188 2544 1134 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.3 47.8 0.0 49.0 0.0 48.5 56.6 6.7 6.7 54.5 5.1 4.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.7 2.2 0.1 0.1 2.1 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.2 0.5 3.6 3.9 1.0 2.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.4 48.0 0.0 49.6 0.0 49.2 58.8 6.8 6.8 56.5 5.3 4.4 LnGrp LOS D D A D A D EAAEAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 33 94 1253 638
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.8 49.4 7.4 8.0
Approach LOS D D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.9 93.5 18.6 10.8 90.7 18.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.0 51.5 41.0 13.0 51.5 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 8.4 6.0 4.3 13.2 5.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.4 0.5 0.0 11.1 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 162 17 112 367 206 64 941 64 73 507 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 162 17 112 367 206 64 941 64 73 507 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 174 10 120 395 51 69 1012 64 78 545 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 73 473 27 146 638 276 119 2695 170 123 1960 872 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.14 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3382 193 1767 3526 1526 1767 4865 307 1767 3526 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 90 94 120 395 51 69 702 374 78 545 6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1812 1767 1763 1526 1767 1689 1795 1767 1763 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 5.6 5.6 8.0 12.4 3.4 4.5 14.0 14.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 5.6 5.6 8.0 12.4 3.4 4.5 14.0 14.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 73 246 253 146 638 276 119 1871 994 123 1960 872 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.82 0.62 0.18 0.58 0.38 0.38 0.64 0.28 0.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 177 477 491 236 1072 464 236 1871 994 236 1960 872 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.99 0.99 0.99 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.9 46.8 46.8 54.2 45.3 41.6 54.3 15.1 15.1 50.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.9 0.9 5.2 1.0 0.3 1.4 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 2.5 2.6 3.8 5.5 1.3 2.1 5.3 5.7 2.2 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.9 47.7 47.7 59.4 46.3 41.9 55.7 15.1 15.2 52.2 0.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D E D D E B B D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 208 566 1145 629
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.8 48.7 17.6 6.8
Approach LOS D D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.9 22.3 12.1 71.7 9.0 27.2 12.3 71.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 32.5 16.0 37.0 12.0 36.5 16.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s10.0 7.6 6.5 2.0 3.6 14.4 7.0 16.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.8 0.0 5.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.4
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 214 581 369 96 687 0 2 594 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 214 581 369 96 687 0 2 594 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 233 632 260 104 747 0 2 646 22
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222220222
Cap, veh/h 385 1105 333 167 2430 0 32 2945 921
Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.68 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.79 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 5106 1541 3456 3647 0 2 4962 1552
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 233 632 260 104 747 0 244 404 22
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1541 1728 1777 0 1867 1549 1552 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 13.3 19.1 3.5 10.1 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 13.3 19.1 3.5 10.1 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.01 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 385 1105 333 167 2430 0 1138 1839 921 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.57 0.78 0.62 0.31 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 564 1617 488 605 2430 0 1138 1839 921 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.4 42.1 44.3 56.0 7.6 0.0 5.6 5.6 5.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.2 2.6 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.3 5.6 7.5 1.6 3.6 0.0 1.6 1.3 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.0 42.2 47.0 57.4 7.7 0.0 6.0 5.8 5.2 LnGrp LOS D D D EAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 1125 851 670
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.5 13.8 5.8
Approach LOS D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.8 77.2 32.0 88.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s21.0 44.0 38.0 70.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.5 6.0 21.1 12.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.8 3.6 6.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.4
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th AWSC
1: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 62 1 38 57 1 189
Future Vol, veh/h 62 1 38 57 1 189
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Heavy Vehicles, % 555555
Mvmt Flow 70 1 43 65 1 215
Number of Lanes 101001
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 8.4 7.6 8.7

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 98% 1%
Vol Thru, % 40% 0% 99%
Vol Right, % 60% 2% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 95 63 190
LT Vol 0 62 1
Through Vol 38 0 189
RT Vol 57 1 0
Lane Flow Rate 108 72 216
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.121 0.097 0.252
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.029 4.874 4.195
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 894 739 844
Service Time 2.035 2.882 2.283
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.097 0.256
HCM Control Delay 7.6 8.4 8.7
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.3 1

HCM 6th AWSC
2: Stanwell Dr & Stanwell Cir EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh10.3
Intersection LOS B
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 143 0 96 115 0 259
Future Vol, veh/h 143 0 96 115 0 259
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 44444
Mvmt Flow 168 0 113 135 0 305
Number of Lanes 1 01001
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1
Conflicting Approach RightSB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0
HCM Control Delay 10.3 9.5 10.9

HCM LOS B A B

Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 45% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 55% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 211 143 259
LT Vol 0 143 0
Through Vol 96 0 259
RT Vol 115 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 248 168 305
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.308 0.252 0.398
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.461 5.397 4.707
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 802 661 762
Service Time 2.51 3.466 2.755
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.309 0.254 0.4
HCM Control Delay 9.5 10.3 10.9
HCM Lane LOS A B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 1 1.9

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 917 583 221 1421 679 229
Future Volume (veh/h) 917 583 221 1421 679 229
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 945 0 228 1465 700 85
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333
Cap, veh/h 2589 251 3459 833 382
Arrive On Green 0.51 0.00 0.14 0.68 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 5233 1572 1767 5233 3428 1572
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 945 0 228 1465 700 85
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1689 1572 1767 1689 1714 1572
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.1 0.0 17.2 17.4 26.2 5.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.1 0.0 17.2 17.4 26.2 5.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2589 251 3459 833 382
V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.91 0.42 0.84 0.22
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2589 262 3459 1244 571
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.63 0.63
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 0.0 57.0 9.6 48.6 40.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 28.4 0.1 2.7 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.9 0.0 9.5 5.9 11.4 2.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.2 0.0 85.5 9.7 51.3 41.1
LnGrp LOS C F A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 945 A 1693 785
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.2 19.9 50.2
Approach LOS C B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s23.2 74.0 37.8 97.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 52.0 49.0 76.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s19.2 17.1 28.2 19.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.5 4.6 22.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 418 117 105 25 39 31 166 407 26 23 537 265 Future Volume (veh/h) 418 117 105 25 39 31 166 407 26 23 537 265 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 431 121 13 26 40 2 171 420 24 24 554 160 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 330 193 162 49 120 6 196 3476 197 47 2200 954 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1856 1563 1767 3418 170 1767 4905 278 1767 3526 1528 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 431 121 13 26 20 22 171 288 156 24 554 160 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1856 1563 1767 1763 1825 1767 1689 1805 1767 1763 1528 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.7 3.7 1.8 9.5 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.0 8.4 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 12.9 3.7 3.7 1.8 9.5 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 193 162 49 62 64 196 2394 1280 47 2200 954 V/C Ratio(X) 1.31 0.63 0.08 0.53 0.33 0.33 0.87 0.12 0.12 0.51 0.25 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 357 301 484 653 676 327 2394 1280 144 2200 954 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.0 58.0 54.7 64.8 63.6 63.6 59.1 6.3 6.3 64.9 11.3 10.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 157.8 1.3 0.1 3.3 1.1 1.1 6.8 0.1 0.2 2.4 0.2 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln12.9 4.0 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.7 6.1 1.3 1.4 0.8 3.7 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 218.8 59.2 54.7 68.1 64.7 64.7 65.8 6.4 6.5 67.2 11.5 10.9 LnGrp LOS F E D EEEEAAEBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 565 68 615 738
Approach Delay, s/veh 180.8 66.0 22.9 13.2
Approach LOS F E C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.6 100.7 17.0 9.8 19.0 89.3 7.7 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.0 43.0 13.0 50.0 25.0 29.0 37.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.8 5.7 15.0 3.6 14.9 11.5 4.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 5.4 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 65.7
HCM 6th LOS E

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 1060 70 120 1491 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 1060 70 120 1491 6 133 1 108 5 7 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 1104 69 125 1553 6 140 00577
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 43 3274 204 147 3808 15 234 0 15 22 22
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.67 0.67 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4871 304 1767 5209 20 3534 0 1572 452 633 633 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 765 408 125 1007 552 140 0 0 19 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1799 1767 1689 1852 1767 0 1572 1719 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 13.0 13.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 13.0 13.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.37
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 43 2270 1209 147 2469 1354 234 0 58 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.85 0.41 0.41 0.60 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 2270 1209 209 2469 1354 288 0 407 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 64.8 9.4 9.4 55.5 0.0 0.0 61.3 0.0 0.0 63.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.4 0.7 13.6 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 4.5 4.9 4.3 0.0 0.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.3 9.8 10.1 69.1 0.1 0.3 62.2 0.0 0.0 64.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E ABEAAEA EAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 1187 1684 140 A 19
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.5 5.3 62.2 64.9
Approach LOS BAEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s15.2 96.2 14.0 7.3 104.2 9.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 56.5 11.0 22.0 50.5 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s11.3 15.0 7.2 3.1 2.0 3.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 14.0 0.1 0.0 22.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 998 60 149 1404 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 998 60 149 1404 27 117 20 261 35 12 96 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 1040 59 155 1462 0 122 21 51 36 12 19 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 110 3336 189 178 3641 196 207 173 185 207 173 Arrive On Green 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4904 278 1767 5066 1572 1347 1856 1547 1299 1856 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 716 383 155 1462 0 122 21 51 36 12 19 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1805 1767 1689 1572 1347 1856 1547 1299 1856 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 12.0 1.4 4.1 3.5 0.8 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 12.8 1.4 4.1 4.8 0.8 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2297 1228 178 3641 196 207 173 185 207 173 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.31 0.31 0.87 0.40 0.62 0.10 0.29 0.19 0.06 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 236 2297 1228 367 3641 395 481 401 377 481 401 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.7 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 59.3 53.9 55.1 56.0 53.6 53.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.1 0.2 4.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.3 0.0 0.1 4.8 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.7 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.9 0.1 0.2 57.8 0.3 0.0 60.5 53.9 55.4 56.2 53.6 54.0 LnGrp LOS E AAEA EDEEDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1170 1617 A 194 67
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 5.8 58.5 55.1
Approach LOS AAEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.4 102.5 20.1 17.6 97.3 20.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.0 67.5 35.0 28.0 57.5 35.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.2 2.0 14.8 13.5 2.0 6.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 23.7 0.3 0.2 13.6 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 1259 4 8 1494 82 12 0 34 77 2 74 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 1259 4 8 1494 82 12 0 34 77 2 74 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 1325 3 8 1573 66 13 0 2 81 2 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 93 4017 1219 34 3848 1169 164 0 126 153 149 126 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.79 0.79 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 5066 1537 1767 5066 1539 1381 0 1572 1404 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 1325 3 8 1573 66 13 0 2 81 2 4
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1537 1767 1689 1539 1381 0 1572 1404 1856 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 9.9 0.1 0.6 14.6 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.2 7.7 0.1 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 9.9 0.1 0.6 14.6 1.5 1.3 0.0 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 4017 1219 34 3848 1169 164 0 126 153 149 126 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.33 0.00 0.24 0.41 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.01 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 4017 1219 157 3848 1169 487 0 489 477 577 489 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.7 3.9 2.9 65.2 5.7 4.1 57.7 0.0 57.2 61.9 57.1 57.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.1 2.7 0.0 0.3 4.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.8 0.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.5 4.0 2.9 66.4 5.9 4.2 57.8 0.0 57.2 62.9 57.2 57.3 LnGrp LOS E AAEAAEAEEEE
Approach Vol, veh/h 1361 1647 15 87
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 6.2 57.7 62.5
Approach LOS AAEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.1 108.0 15.9 6.6 112.6 15.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s12.0 66.5 42.0 12.0 66.5 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.4 16.6 3.3 2.6 11.9 11.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 24.9 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7
HCM 6th LOS A

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 109 1268 53 21 1304 106 81 0 51 156 0 273 Future Volume (veh/h) 109 1268 53 21 1304 106 81 0 51 156 0 273 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 0 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 117 1363 56 23 1402 114 87 0 1 168 0 95 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333303303
Cap, veh/h 141 1700 70 838 3527 287 124 0 0 228 0 0
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.47 0.74 0.74 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 4990 205 1767 4774 388 1767 87 3428 168 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 117 922 497 23 992 524 87 68.3 168 63.6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1689 1818 1767 1689 1785 1767 E 1714 E Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 33.4 33.4 0.9 14.7 14.7 6.5 6.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.8 33.4 33.4 0.9 14.7 14.7 6.5 6.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 141 1151 620 838 2495 1319 124 228 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.80 0.80 0.03 0.40 0.40 0.70 0.74
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 353 1151 620 838 2495 1319 648 1244 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.2 40.4 40.4 18.9 6.5 6.5 61.4 61.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.4 5.6 10.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 7.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.1 14.5 16.3 0.4 4.6 4.8 3.2 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.6 46.0 50.4 18.9 6.6 6.7 68.3 63.6 LnGrp LOS E D D BAAE E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1536 1539
Approach Delay, s/veh 48.9 6.8
Approach LOS D A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s69.5 51.5 14.0 15.8 105.2 14.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 * 5.5 4.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s25.0 * 46 49.5 27.0 43.5 49.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.9 35.4 8.5 10.8 16.7 8.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.1 11.8 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 5 1387 17 7 1326 3 16 0 35 5 1 4
Future Volume (vph) 5 1387 17 7 1326 3 16 0 35 5 1 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 9.0 5.0 9.0 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.98
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5076 1770 5084 1664 1719
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.89 0.89
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5076 1770 5084 1506 1575
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 1460 18 7 1396 3 17 0 37 5 1 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 4 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1478 0 7 1399 0030060
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3
Permitted Phases 3 3
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 8.0 8.0
Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 84.5 4.8 85.3 8.0 8.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.63 0.04 0.63 0.06 0.06
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 52 3177 62 3212 89 93
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.29 0.00 c0.28
v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.00
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.47 0.11 0.44 0.04 0.07
Uniform Delay, d1 63.7 13.3 63.0 12.6 59.9 60.0
Progression Factor 1.45 0.43 0.72 0.11 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.4
Delay (s) 93.5 6.2 46.5 1.5 60.1 60.4
Level of Service F A D A E E
Approach Delay (s) 6.5 1.7 60.1 60.4
Approach LOS AAEE
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 5.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 135.0 Sum of lost time (s) 23.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 9 1415 3 10 1316 39 0 0 6 157 0 20 Future Volume (vph) 9 1415 3 10 1316 39 0 0 6 157 0 20
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 8.5 5.0 7.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 5034 1752 5014 0 1665 1630
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 5034 1752 5014 0 1665 1630
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 1489 3 11 1385 41 0 0 6 165 0 21
RTOR Reduction (vph) 000010060000
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1492 0 11 1425 0 0 0 0 94 92 0
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 87.5 4.8 88.3 0.0 14.2 14.2
Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 85.0 4.8 86.8 0.0 14.2 14.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.63 0.04 0.64 0.00 0.11 0.11
Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 51 3169 62 3223 0 175 171
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.30 0.01 c0.28 c0.06 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.47 0.18 0.44 0.00 0.54 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 63.9 13.2 63.2 12.0 67.5 57.3 57.3
Progression Factor 1.47 0.03 0.89 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5 1.7 0.1 0.0 4.0 4.1
Delay (s) 96.2 0.9 58.0 7.1 67.5 61.3 61.4
Level of Service F A E A E E E
Approach Delay (s) 1.5 7.4 67.5 61.3
Approach LOS AAEE
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 135.0 Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1548 36 79 916 191 31 53 186 616 37 489 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1548 36 79 916 191 31 53 186 616 37 489 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1612 36 82 954 0 32 55 49 642 0 250 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 0 2328 52 125 3119 117 123 104 718 0 639
Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.00 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 4980 101 1767 5233 0 1767 1856 1572 3534 0 3145 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 993 655 82 954 0 32 55 49 642 0 250 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1392 1834 1767 1689 0 1767 1856 1572 1767 0 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 12.0 0.0 2.3 3.9 4.1 23.9 0.0 9.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 12.0 0.0 2.3 3.9 4.1 23.9 0.0 9.3 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.05 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1435 945 125 3119 117 123 104 718 0 639 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.66 0.31 0.27 0.45 0.47 0.89 0.00 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1435 945 196 3119 170 179 151 969 0 862 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.1 12.3 0.0 59.9 60.6 60.7 52.4 0.0 46.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 2.5 3.7 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.9 1.2 7.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.5 1.0 2.8 4.4 0.0 1.1 1.9 1.7 11.1 0.0 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 2.5 3.7 63.2 12.4 0.0 60.4 61.6 62.0 59.3 0.0 46.7 LnGrp LOS A AAEB EEEEAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1648 1036 A 136 892
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.0 16.4 61.4 55.8
Approach LOS ABEE
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s13.5 75.1 13.9 88.6 32.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.0 50.5 13.0 69.5 37.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s8.1 2.0 6.1 14.0 25.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 24.4 0.1 11.8 1.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved changes to right turn type.

Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
13: Market St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 36 1316 564 54 940 207 229 462 103 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 36 1316 564 54 940 207 229 462 103 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 1357 478 56 969 131 236 476 106 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333
Cap, veh/h 67 2159 749 115 4029 1115 667 558 124
Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.72 0.72 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 62 3432 1190 1767 5567 1540 3428 2868 635 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 678 610 584 56 969 131 236 291 291 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1692 1537 1455 1767 1856 1540 1714 1763 1740 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.9 3.5 8.0 21.5 21.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 7.9 3.5 8.0 21.5 21.8 Prop In Lane 0.05 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1093 967 915 115 4029 1115 667 343 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.49 0.24 0.12 0.35 0.85 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1093 967 915 209 4029 1115 927 477 470 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.9 6.2 5.6 47.0 52.4 52.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 7.6 8.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.4 0.4 1.9 2.9 1.1 3.4 10.2 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 1.2 1.4 1.5 62.1 6.3 5.7 47.1 60.0 61.0 LnGrp LOS A AAEAADEE
Approach Vol, veh/h 1872 1156 818
Approach Delay, s/veh 1.3 8.9 56.6
Approach LOS A A E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.8 90.4 31.8 103.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.5 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s16.0 67.5 36.5 87.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.1 2.0 23.8 9.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 36.1 2.3 14.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1377 32 28 989 0 0 0 0 48 17 188 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1377 32 28 989 0 0 0 0 48 17 188 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1465 33 30 1052 0 51 18 200
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 33330 333
Cap, veh/h 0 3484 78 47 3788 0 291 581 256
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.03 0.75 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 5262 115 1767 5233 0 1767 3526 1552
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 971 527 30 1052 0 51 18 200
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1689 1833 1767 1689 0 1767 1763 1552 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 15.3 15.3 2.0 7.9 0.0 3.0 0.5 14.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 15.3 15.3 2.0 7.9 0.0 3.0 0.5 14.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.06 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 2309 1253 47 3788 0 291 581 256 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.64 0.28 0.00 0.18 0.03 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 2309 1253 199 3788 0 560 1116 492 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.4 8.4 57.9 4.8 0.0 43.1 42.1 48.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 5.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 5.1 5.5 1.1 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.2 6.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.5 8.5 71.3 4.9 0.0 43.4 42.1 53.2 LnGrp LOS A AAEAA DDD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1498 1082 269
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.7 50.6
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.7 87.6 24.8 95.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.5 53.5 38.0 71.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.0 17.3 16.8 9.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 13.5 0.9 9.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 111 1182 18 0 984 63 24 31 33 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 111 1182 18 0 984 63 24 31 33 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 114 1219 18 0 1014 0 25 32 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33033333
Cap, veh/h 269 4229 62 0 3565 57 73 34
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 5143 76 0 5400 0 606 775 363
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 800 437 0 1014 0 72 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1689 1842 0 1689 0 1744 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 6.9 6.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 6.9 6.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 269 2777 1514 0 3565 164 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.28 0.44 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 686 2777 1514 0 3565 279 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.96 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.9 2.6 2.6 0.0 6.9 0.0 53.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.7 1.7 1.9 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.3 2.8 3.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 54.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E AAAA DAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 1351 1014 A 72
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.3 6.9 54.2
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 108.3 16.7 14.8 93.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 89.5 20.0 25.0 64.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 6.9 6.0 11.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 11.2 0.2 0.2 8.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 92 78 40 75 78 35 935 76 95 1041 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 92 78 40 75 78 35 935 76 95 1041 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 48 96 5 42 78 13 36 974 74 99 1084 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 222 306 247 157 293 52 103 3042 231 142 2313 1014 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 1260 1856 1498 654 1779 312 1767 4798 364 1767 3526 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 48 96 5 66 0 67 36 685 363 99 1084 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1260 1856 1498 1133 0 1613 1767 1689 1785 1767 1763 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 5.5 0.3 3.6 0.0 4.4 2.4 11.2 11.2 6.5 18.3 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.5 5.5 0.3 9.1 0.0 4.4 2.4 11.2 11.2 6.5 18.3 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.19 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 306 247 236 0 266 103 2141 1132 142 2313 1014 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.31 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.25 0.35 0.32 0.32 0.70 0.47 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 445 634 512 487 0 551 206 2141 1132 206 2313 1014 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.4 44.1 42.0 46.3 0.0 43.7 54.3 10.1 10.1 53.8 10.3 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.5 1.7 0.1 0.1 5.8 0.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.3 2.6 0.1 1.9 0.0 1.8 1.1 4.0 4.3 3.1 6.7 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.8 44.7 42.0 47.0 0.0 44.2 56.0 10.2 10.2 59.6 10.9 7.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D A D EBBEBA
Approach Vol, veh/h 149 133 1084 1242
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.6 45.5 11.7 14.6
Approach LOS D D B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.0 84.2 24.8 13.6 81.6 24.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 50.5 41.0 14.0 50.5 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.4 20.3 11.1 8.5 13.2 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.3 0.8 0.1 8.7 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 601 70 70 244 224 99 731 173 255 855 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 601 70 70 244 224 99 731 173 255 855 36 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 620 65 72 252 60 102 754 147 263 881 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 125 760 80 121 826 362 128 1610 310 286 1651 730 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.32 0.94 0.94 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3210 336 1767 3526 1544 1767 4244 818 1767 3526 1558 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 340 345 72 252 60 102 598 303 263 881 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1783 1767 1763 1544 1767 1689 1685 1767 1763 1558 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 21.9 22.0 4.7 7.1 3.7 6.8 16.0 16.3 17.2 3.8 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 21.9 22.0 4.7 7.1 3.7 6.8 16.0 16.3 17.2 3.8 0.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 125 417 422 121 826 362 128 1281 639 286 1651 730 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.81 0.82 0.60 0.31 0.17 0.80 0.47 0.47 0.92 0.53 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 206 492 498 206 984 431 206 1281 639 353 1651 730 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.5 43.3 43.3 54.3 37.9 36.6 54.8 28.1 28.2 39.9 2.1 2.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 8.8 8.9 1.8 0.2 0.2 3.7 0.1 0.2 21.9 1.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.6 10.4 10.6 2.2 3.1 1.4 3.2 6.5 6.6 8.0 1.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.0 52.1 52.3 56.1 38.1 36.8 58.5 28.2 28.4 61.8 3.3 2.1 LnGrp LOS E D D E D D E C C E A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 771 384 1003 1159
Approach Delay, s/veh 52.7 41.3 31.3 16.5
Approach LOS D D C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s12.2 33.9 12.7 61.2 12.5 33.6 23.4 50.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 33.5 14.0 40.0 14.0 33.5 24.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 24.0 8.8 5.8 7.7 9.1 19.2 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.0 4.8 0.0 1.8 0.2 3.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.3
HCM 6th LOS C

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 171 432 320 127 707 0 5 932 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 171 432 320 127 707 0 5 932 43 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 186 470 272 138 768 0 5 1013 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222220222
Cap, veh/h 389 1115 337 196 2422 0 34 2888 905
Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.68 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 5106 1541 3456 3647 0 6 4952 1551
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 186 470 272 138 768 0 382 636 26
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1541 1728 1777 0 1861 1549 1551 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.9 9.5 20.1 4.7 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.9 9.5 20.1 4.7 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.01 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 389 1115 337 196 2422 0 1115 1806 905 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.42 0.81 0.70 0.32 0.00 0.34 0.35 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 653 1872 565 547 2422 0 1115 1806 905 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.9 40.4 44.5 55.6 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.1 1.8 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.8 4.0 7.8 2.1 3.8 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.3 40.5 46.3 57.3 7.8 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D EAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 928 906 1044
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 15.4 0.5
Approach LOS D B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.8 76.0 32.2 87.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 40.0 44.0 64.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.7 2.0 22.1 12.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 8.5 2.9 6.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.7
HCM 6th LOS B

Attachment D: Queue Worksheets

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 759 402 178 925 237 157
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.74 0.23 0.56 0.47
Control Delay 11.3 2.3 67.8 5.7 85.8 42.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.3 2.3 67.8 5.7 85.8 42.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 0 125 80 98 74
Queue Length 95th (ft) 141 47 m222 116 141 m123
Internal Link Dist (ft) 435 704 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 360 100
Base Capacity (vph) 3123 1112 350 3983 1076 597
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.51 0.23 0.22 0.26
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 295 182 71 12 37 55 153 28 272 202 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.65 0.21 0.13 0.16 0.45 0.05 0.28 0.12 0.19 Control Delay 59.2 58.4 1.7 57.6 32.1 64.4 8.0 55.0 10.5 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.2 58.4 1.7 57.6 32.1 64.4 8.0 55.0 10.5 3.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 113 123 0 9 7 42 13 16 69 25
Queue Length 95th (ft) 161 205 3 30 24 83 28 m41 95 70
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 638 649 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 60 150 70 243
Base Capacity (vph) 453 492 511 452 1268 151 3293 146 2251 1058 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.37 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.36 0.05 0.19 0.12 0.19 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 927 114 1055 40 41 67 3
v/c Ratio 0.08 0.28 0.63 0.27 0.69 0.75 0.29 0.02
Control Delay 62.6 5.0 76.5 3.2 105.4 116.8 5.9 40.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 62.6 5.0 76.5 3.2 105.4 116.8 5.9 40.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 37 93 8 31 32 0 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 63 158 88 #95 #102 16 11
Internal Link Dist (ft) 704 867 473 127
Turn Bay Length (ft) 220 140 80
Base Capacity (vph) 262 3285 262 3927 60 57 239 449
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.28 0.44 0.27 0.67 0.72 0.28 0.01 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 831 231 1147 36 33 18 122 9 7 29 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.78 0.31 0.03 0.28 0.12 0.50 0.08 0.04 0.13 Control Delay 63.9 4.7 73.8 3.0 0.0 58.0 52.5 16.5 52.1 51.0 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.9 4.7 73.8 3.0 0.0 58.0 52.5 16.5 52.1 51.0 1.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 30 177 2 0 24 13 0750
Queue Length 95th (ft) 88 36 195 2 0 56 36 53 23 20 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 867 598 790 507
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 230 130 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 204 3110 467 3704 1153 404 538 543 401 538 518 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.49 0.31 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.22 0.02 0.01 0.06 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 845 25 41 1402 51 17 11
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.21 0.02 0.28 0.34 0.04 0.13 0.03
Control Delay 44.8 3.8 0.1 42.4 6.0 3.0 52.9 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.8 3.8 0.1 42.4 6.0 3.0 52.9 0.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 50 0 28 183 6 12 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 66 1 57 174 14 35 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 979
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 120 100 200 120 130
Base Capacity (vph) 175 3976 1217 204 4142 1270 488 693 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.21 0.02 0.20 0.34 0.04 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 195 712 60 1514 35 33 27 82
v/c Ratio 0.76 0.20 0.26 0.45 0.27 0.15 0.10 0.36
Control Delay 66.6 13.2 48.0 14.8 57.2 1.4 52.3 7.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 66.6 13.2 48.0 14.8 57.2 1.4 52.3 7.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 162 91 32 257 26 0 10 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 177 133 59 298 56 0 23 15
Internal Link Dist (ft) 979 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 110 70 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 327 3539 305 3351 649 655 1246 641
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.20 0.20 0.45 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.13 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 559 24 1382 16 6
v/c Ratio 0.34 0.16 0.14 0.39 0.18 0.03
Control Delay 66.8 16.0 30.9 0.8 47.2 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 66.8 16.0 50.2 0.8 47.2 0.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 75 18 6 8 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 157 m33 7 32 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 569 35 148 175
Turn Bay Length (ft) 160
Base Capacity (vph) 343 3409 175 3543 187 315
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 136 402 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 50 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.17 0.62 0.44 0.09 0.02
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 517 34 1555 44 43
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.15 0.20 0.45 0.30 0.30
Control Delay 7.2 0.4 38.5 4.7 56.2 56.4
Queue Delay 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 0.5 38.5 4.7 56.2 56.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 1 26 119 34 33
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 2 m45 148 73 72
Internal Link Dist (ft) 35 756 203
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50
Base Capacity (vph) 129 3399 173 3460 316 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 31 1807 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 68 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.32 0.20 0.46 0.14 0.14
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 645 85 1120 21 34 81 753 420 397
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.52 0.43 0.16 0.25 0.38 0.77 0.78 0.68
Control Delay 34.0 48.6 15.4 54.9 57.0 10.3 43.9 36.9 21.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 34.0 48.6 15.4 54.9 57.0 10.3 43.9 36.9 21.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 220 44 90 16 25 0 274 224 123
Queue Length 95th (ft) 272 82 107 41 58 29 308 321 217
Internal Link Dist (ft) 756 755 965 677
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 140 140 310
Base Capacity (vph) 1718 217 2578 188 197 261 1116 592 633 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.39 0.43 0.11 0.17 0.31 0.67 0.71 0.63 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Market St & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1268 75 1135 326 156 425
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.76
Control Delay 8.8 72.7 3.3 2.1 44.6 54.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.8 72.7 3.3 2.1 44.6 54.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 190 58 26 0 55 160
Queue Length 95th (ft) 214 100 56 0 81 200
Internal Link Dist (ft) 755 936 620
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 130 170
Base Capacity (vph) 3084 231 3491 1045 1024 1043
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.32 0.33 0.31 0.15 0.41
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 708 13 1207 62 24 250
v/c Ratio 0.20 0.14 0.33 0.21 0.04 0.79
Control Delay 11.0 61.6 3.0 42.0 38.0 50.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.0 61.6 3.1 42.0 38.0 50.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 11 47 42 8 135
Queue Length 95th (ft) 139 m30 50 75 18 209
Internal Link Dist (ft) 936 372 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 60 80
Base Capacity (vph) 3502 195 3713 546 1099 533
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 855 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.07 0.42 0.11 0.02 0.47
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 661 1284 26
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.15 0.35 0.15
Control Delay 75.2 0.7 2.2 40.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 75.2 0.7 2.3 40.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 28 36 13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 2 57 42
Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 347 272
Turn Bay Length (ft) 180
Base Capacity (vph) 561 4407 3681 292
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 1049 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.15 0.49 0.09
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 22 23 128 15 1217 34 561 32
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.45 0.10 0.33 0.23 0.21 0.03
Control Delay 52.3 52.3 1.4 38.9 57.4 1.5 65.5 2.1 0.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Delay 52.3 52.3 1.4 38.9 57.4 1.6 65.5 2.3 0.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 16 0 33 13 19 26 5 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 42 0 64 m30 41 61 34 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 567 313 300 347
Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 70 130
Base Capacity (vph) 412 618 555 988 186 3691 186 2675 1193 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 537 0 1197 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.39 0.18 0.38 0.03 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 192 120 395 215 69 1064 73 531 15 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.29 0.66 0.43 0.38 0.47 0.44 0.48 0.31 0.02 Control Delay 55.6 38.8 68.3 37.5 6.1 69.5 19.2 81.0 10.6 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 55.6 38.8 68.3 37.5 6.1 69.5 19.3 81.0 10.7 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 58 91 128 0 55 233 60 66 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 91 151 168 55 m95 213 112 86 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 700 323 310 300
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 130 100 90 125
Base Capacity (vph) 175 940 233 1075 620 233 2433 233 1715 802 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 450 0 408 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.20 0.52 0.37 0.35 0.30 0.54 0.31 0.41 0.02 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EX_AM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 233 632 392 104 738 634 43
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.56 0.79 0.45 0.31 0.22 0.05
Control Delay 47.0 42.4 32.9 59.7 9.3 3.8 0.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 47.0 42.4 33.0 59.7 9.3 3.8 0.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 164 160 151 40 110 5 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 218 176 241 68 189 23 m0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 319 265 310
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 553 1610 623 600 2396 2888 896
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 1 0 30 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.39 0.63 0.17 0.31 0.22 0.05
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 904 601 188 1419 700 199
v/c Ratio 0.37 0.57 0.77 0.43 0.77 0.35
Control Delay 23.6 4.4 87.8 9.5 44.1 10.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 23.6 4.4 87.8 9.5 44.1 10.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 176 0 176 98 317 68
Queue Length 95th (ft) 257 82 m0 m215 m246 m81
Internal Link Dist (ft) 435 704 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 360 100
Base Capacity (vph) 2460 1056 277 3315 1234 695
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.57 0.68 0.43 0.57 0.29
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 405 121 108 26 72 171 435 24 541 245 v/c Ratio 1.24 0.54 0.34 0.29 0.30 0.75 0.12 0.27 0.26 0.24 Control Delay 179.7 65.1 6.0 69.3 38.2 76.3 7.9 65.5 13.1 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 179.7 65.1 6.0 69.3 38.2 76.3 7.9 65.5 13.1 2.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~226 104 0 23 17 147 45 22 84 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #332 165 24 54 42 217 74 m36 164 37 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 638 649 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 60 150 70 243
Base Capacity (vph) 327 355 414 480 1231 324 3500 142 2078 1004 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.24 0.34 0.26 0.05 0.06 0.53 0.12 0.17 0.26 0.24 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 1098 125 1472 69 71 113 31
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.34 0.69 0.39 1.35 1.39 0.47 0.24
Control Delay 79.8 4.3 89.7 3.1 291.2 304.9 14.4 37.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 79.8 4.3 89.7 3.1 291.2 304.9 14.4 37.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 38 114 75 ~82 ~86 0 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) m35 51 179 72 #191 #197 49 44
Internal Link Dist (ft) 704 867 473 127
Turn Bay Length (ft) 220 140 80
Base Capacity (vph) 285 3214 217 3737 51 51 239 412
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.34 0.58 0.39 1.35 1.39 0.47 0.08 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 1023 155 1375 28 122 21 272 36 13 100 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.32 0.73 0.39 0.03 0.72 0.09 0.63 0.21 0.06 0.36 Control Delay 86.1 2.5 89.5 4.7 0.4 78.6 50.2 12.4 53.6 49.2 12.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 86.1 2.5 89.5 4.7 0.4 78.6 50.2 12.4 53.6 49.2 12.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 18 128 8 1 105 17 0 29 10 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 31 161 288 3 164 40 79 60 30 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 867 598 790 507
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 230 130 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 233 3229 363 3566 1105 355 478 608 355 478 472 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.32 0.43 0.39 0.03 0.34 0.04 0.45 0.10 0.03 0.21 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 1245 4 8 1484 86 13 36 81 2 78 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.39 0.07 0.09 0.18 0.59 0.01 0.35 Control Delay 54.9 3.6 0.0 66.9 10.3 3.2 54.9 8.3 75.1 52.5 15.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.9 3.6 0.0 66.9 10.3 3.2 54.9 8.3 75.1 52.5 15.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 67 0 7 323 4 11 0 70 2 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m63 120 m0 m16 419 25 32 20 121 10 48 Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 979 208 204
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 120 100 200 120 130
Base Capacity (vph) 155 4037 1230 155 3828 1182 434 524 429 574 541 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.31 0.00 0.05 0.39 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.19 0.00 0.14 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 1420 23 1425 87 55 69 203
v/c Ratio 0.34 0.38 0.17 0.37 0.53 0.23 0.23 0.63
Control Delay 81.8 4.3 42.1 1.9 69.9 2.2 57.8 16.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 81.8 4.3 42.1 1.9 69.9 2.2 57.8 16.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 33 20 40 74 0 29 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 231 49 20 127 1 52 75
Internal Link Dist (ft) 979 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 110 70 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 350 3772 324 3883 642 641 1234 688
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.38 0.07 0.37 0.14 0.09 0.06 0.30 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1381 7 1309 54 10
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.40 0.05 0.38 0.21 0.08
Control Delay 78.6 6.2 43.0 1.3 1.9 47.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 78.6 6.2 44.9 1.4 1.9 47.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 91 6 12 0 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) m11 38 m16 13 0 24
Internal Link Dist (ft) 569 35 148 175
Turn Bay Length (ft) 160
Base Capacity (vph) 196 3437 157 3473 289 161
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 110 752 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.40 0.15 0.48 0.19 0.06
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1396 11 1337 6 94 92
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.41 0.08 0.39 0.03 0.54 0.54
Control Delay 86.2 0.7 51.2 6.8 0.0 68.1 68.3
Queue Delay 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 86.7 0.8 51.2 6.8 0.0 68.1 68.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 4 9 99 0 84 82
Queue Length 95th (ft) m18 9 m23 160 0 140 138
Internal Link Dist (ft) 35 756 63 203
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50
Base Capacity (vph) 194 3410 155 3424 190 431 422
Starvation Cap Reductn 99 542 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.49 0.07 0.39 0.03 0.22 0.22
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1555 82 1099 32 55 194 642 262 252 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.54 0.39 0.25 0.40 0.69 0.81 0.51 0.50
Control Delay 35.8 61.3 14.6 63.3 68.2 24.2 57.4 13.8 12.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.8 61.3 14.6 63.3 68.2 24.2 57.4 13.8 12.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 592 55 109 27 47 14 274 41 33
Queue Length 95th (ft) #764 97 124 61 91 92 328 123 112 Internal Link Dist (ft) 756 755 965 677
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 140 140 310
Base Capacity (vph) 1911 194 2843 168 177 311 931 568 557 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.42 0.39 0.19 0.31 0.62 0.69 0.46 0.45 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Market St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1880 56 948 192 225 582
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.41 0.28 0.20 0.32 0.81
Control Delay 11.0 68.5 7.6 3.9 45.8 58.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.0 68.5 7.6 3.9 45.8 58.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 221 48 103 24 87 251
Queue Length 95th (ft) 323 93 150 63 118 299
Internal Link Dist (ft) 755 936 620
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 130 170
Base Capacity (vph) 3034 207 3379 978 919 933
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.27 0.28 0.20 0.24 0.62
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1449 30 1017 51 18 191
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.27 0.25 0.26 0.05 0.69
Control Delay 7.6 59.0 3.5 50.0 44.8 34.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.6 59.0 3.8 50.0 44.8 34.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 146 23 53 37 6 58
Queue Length 95th (ft) 241 54 99 71 17 130
Internal Link Dist (ft) 936 372 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 60 80
Base Capacity (vph) 3675 197 4022 551 1109 565
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2126 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.15 0.54 0.09 0.02 0.34
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 1198 1045 91
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.29 0.30 0.48
Control Delay 58.6 3.0 7.6 50.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 58.6 3.4 8.1 50.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 65 104 55
Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 89 137 109
Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 347 272
Turn Bay Length (ft) 180
Base Capacity (vph) 680 4098 3467 290
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 2145 1801 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.61 0.63 0.31
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 96 81 201 36 1019 99 1045 83
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.51 0.36 0.58 0.24 0.31 0.54 0.40 0.07
Control Delay 66.0 60.2 14.7 36.9 58.7 2.8 61.5 7.5 1.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0
Total Delay 66.0 60.2 14.7 36.9 58.7 2.9 61.5 8.2 1.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 72 0 46 30 22 74 164 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 124 46 84 m60 54 127 236 17
Internal Link Dist (ft) 567 313 300 347
Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 70 130
Base Capacity (vph) 336 630 574 974 204 3335 212 2590 1154 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 851 0 1103 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 100 0
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.21 0.18 0.41 0.47 0.70 0.07 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 692 72 252 221 102 908 251 855 37 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.79 0.48 0.29 0.41 0.61 0.51 0.84 0.56 0.05 Control Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 59.5 31.8 71.9 23.8 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0
Total Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 59.5 31.9 71.9 24.1 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 257 55 83 0 75 213 152 269 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 318 101 116 59 109 285 #235 386 2 Internal Link Dist (ft) 700 323 310 300
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 130 100 90 125
Base Capacity (vph) 204 971 204 978 588 204 1779 352 1525 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 221 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.71 0.35 0.26 0.38 0.50 0.59 0.71 0.66 0.05 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EX_PM
Kolaboration Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 470 335 138 757 990 47
v/c Ratio 0.55 0.47 0.78 0.52 0.30 0.33 0.05
Control Delay 47.9 43.3 36.4 60.1 8.1 6.5 0.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 47.9 43.3 36.4 60.1 8.1 6.6 0.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 132 120 137 54 101 54 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 180 134 217 85 186 66 m1
Internal Link Dist (ft) 319 265 310
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 640 1864 666 543 2494 2982 923
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 588 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.30 0.41 0.05
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 788 402 198 948 237 182
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.37 0.76 0.24 0.56 0.52
Control Delay 12.1 2.4 66.6 5.6 85.6 42.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 12.1 2.4 66.6 5.6 85.6 42.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 96 0 128 111 98 87
Queue Length 95th (ft) 152 48 m243 74 141 m137
Internal Link Dist (ft) 435 704 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 360 100
Base Capacity (vph) 3066 1099 351 3983 1076 614
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.37 0.56 0.24 0.22 0.30
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 312 182 71 12 37 55 161 28 278 215 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.64 0.20 0.13 0.16 0.45 0.05 0.28 0.12 0.20 Control Delay 60.5 57.9 1.7 57.6 32.1 64.4 8.0 55.5 10.4 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 60.5 57.9 1.7 57.6 32.1 64.4 8.0 55.5 10.4 3.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 120 123 0 9 7 42 14 16 72 32
Queue Length 95th (ft) 170 205 3 30 24 83 29 m40 100 79 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 638 649 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 60 150 70 243
Base Capacity (vph) 453 492 511 452 1268 151 3289 146 2246 1060 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.37 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.36 0.05 0.19 0.12 0.20 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 982 114 1098 40 41 67 3
v/c Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.63 0.28 0.69 0.75 0.29 0.02
Control Delay 61.5 5.2 73.7 4.9 105.4 116.8 5.9 40.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 61.5 5.2 73.7 4.9 105.4 116.8 5.9 40.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 40 93 9 31 32 0 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) m27 69 157 140 #95 #102 16 11
Internal Link Dist (ft) 704 867 473 127
Turn Bay Length (ft) 220 140 80
Base Capacity (vph) 262 3288 262 3927 60 57 239 449
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.30 0.44 0.28 0.67 0.72 0.28 0.01 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 889 231 1192 36 33 18 122 9 7 29 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.29 0.78 0.32 0.03 0.28 0.12 0.50 0.08 0.04 0.13 Control Delay 63.2 4.7 69.4 3.1 0.0 58.0 52.5 16.5 52.1 51.0 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.2 4.7 69.4 3.1 0.0 58.0 52.5 16.5 52.1 51.0 1.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 32 177 2 0 24 13 0750
Queue Length 95th (ft) 87 38 197 2 0 56 36 53 23 20 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 867 598 790 507
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 230 130 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 204 3110 467 3704 1153 404 538 543 401 538 518 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.29 0.49 0.32 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.22 0.02 0.01 0.06 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 902 25 41 1447 51 17 11
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.23 0.02 0.28 0.35 0.04 0.13 0.03
Control Delay 44.5 3.8 0.0 39.9 5.9 2.8 52.9 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.5 3.8 0.0 39.9 5.9 2.8 52.9 0.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 52 0 27 194 6 12 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 67 0 m52 179 m13 35 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 979
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 120 100 200 120 130
Base Capacity (vph) 175 3976 1217 204 4142 1270 488 692 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.23 0.02 0.20 0.35 0.04 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 254 712 60 1580 35 33 75 128
v/c Ratio 0.79 0.22 0.23 0.52 0.24 0.14 0.28 0.54
Control Delay 61.0 15.0 47.0 19.2 55.6 1.2 54.7 17.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 61.0 15.0 47.0 19.2 55.6 1.2 54.7 17.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 181 101 31 265 26 0 28 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 221 136 60 318 56 0 50 51
Internal Link Dist (ft) 979 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 110 70 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 351 3288 305 3024 649 655 1246 648
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.22 0.20 0.52 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.20 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 603 24 1443 16 6
v/c Ratio 0.34 0.18 0.14 0.41 0.18 0.03
Control Delay 65.7 14.6 30.2 0.8 47.2 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 65.7 14.6 49.5 0.9 47.2 0.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 75 18 6 8 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 158 m32 8 32 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 569 35 148 175
Turn Bay Length (ft) 160
Base Capacity (vph) 343 3410 175 3547 187 315
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 136 391 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 44 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.18 0.62 0.46 0.09 0.02
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 562 34 1615 44 43
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.17 0.20 0.47 0.30 0.30
Control Delay 8.8 1.0 37.9 4.6 56.2 56.4
Queue Delay 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.7 1.2 37.9 4.6 56.2 56.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 2 26 120 34 33
Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 9 m43 149 73 72
Internal Link Dist (ft) 35 756 203
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50
Base Capacity (vph) 119 3399 173 3460 316 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 24 1722 0000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 67 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.34 0.20 0.48 0.14 0.14
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 691 85 1158 21 34 81 753 431 411
v/c Ratio 0.40 0.52 0.45 0.16 0.25 0.38 0.76 0.80 0.71
Control Delay 33.1 49.4 15.6 54.9 57.0 10.3 43.6 37.6 23.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 33.1 49.4 15.6 54.9 57.0 10.3 43.6 37.6 23.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 224 45 95 16 25 0 274 231 140
Queue Length 95th (ft) 284 83 105 41 58 29 308 331 237
Internal Link Dist (ft) 756 755 965 677
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 140 140 310
Base Capacity (vph) 1716 217 2575 188 197 261 1120 596 630 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.39 0.45 0.11 0.17 0.31 0.67 0.72 0.65 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Market St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1314 75 1158 333 164 425
v/c Ratio 2.87dr 0.47 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.76
Control Delay 18.6 73.1 3.5 2.1 44.9 54.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 18.6 73.1 3.5 2.1 44.9 54.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 202 58 28 0 58 160
Queue Length 95th (ft) #232 101 66 0 84 200
Internal Link Dist (ft) 755 936 620
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 130 170
Base Capacity (vph) 1651 231 3494 1045 1024 1043
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.80 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.16 0.41
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 731 13 1230 62 24 255
v/c Ratio 0.21 0.14 0.33 0.21 0.04 0.79
Control Delay 8.2 62.1 3.1 41.2 37.5 51.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 62.1 3.1 41.2 37.5 51.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 72 11 49 42 8 141
Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 m30 51 75 18 216
Internal Link Dist (ft) 936 372 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 60 80
Base Capacity (vph) 3473 195 3683 546 1099 531
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 804 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.07 0.43 0.11 0.02 0.48
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 108 681 1309 26
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.15 0.36 0.15
Control Delay 76.2 0.6 2.2 40.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 76.2 0.6 2.3 40.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 1 36 13
Queue Length 95th (ft) 78 2 59 42
Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 347 272
Turn Bay Length (ft) 180
Base Capacity (vph) 561 4407 3679 292
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 1025 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.15 0.49 0.09
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 22 23 128 15 1240 34 581 32
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.45 0.10 0.34 0.23 0.22 0.03
Control Delay 52.3 52.3 1.4 38.9 56.7 1.6 64.9 1.8 0.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
Total Delay 52.3 52.3 1.4 38.9 56.7 1.6 64.9 1.9 0.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 16 0 33 13 19 26 6 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 42 0 64 m28 42 61 34 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 567 313 300 347
Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 70 130
Base Capacity (vph) 412 618 555 988 186 3691 186 2675 1193 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 545 0 1171 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.39 0.18 0.39 0.03 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 192 120 395 222 69 1081 78 545 15 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.29 0.66 0.43 0.39 0.47 0.45 0.51 0.32 0.02 Control Delay 55.6 38.8 68.3 37.5 6.1 68.8 19.3 81.6 10.8 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Delay 55.6 38.8 68.3 37.5 6.1 68.8 19.5 81.6 11.0 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 58 91 128 0 54 226 64 66 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 91 151 168 55 m93 235 118 93 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 700 323 310 300
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 130 100 90 125
Base Capacity (vph) 175 940 233 1075 625 233 2425 233 1715 802 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 436 0 401 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.20 0.52 0.37 0.36 0.30 0.54 0.33 0.41 0.02 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EXPP_AM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 233 632 401 104 747 648 43
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.55 0.81 0.45 0.31 0.39 0.05
Control Delay 46.2 41.9 34.7 59.7 9.6 5.9 0.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 46.2 41.9 34.8 59.7 9.6 5.9 0.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 162 158 161 40 115 5 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 218 176 254 68 192 92 m0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 319 265 310
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 553 1610 620 600 2382 1677 890
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 2 0 39 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.39 0.65 0.17 0.32 0.39 0.05
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
3: Diamond Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 945 601 228 1465 700 236
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.58 0.79 0.44 0.77 0.40
Control Delay 26.0 4.6 85.0 8.8 43.7 11.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 26.0 4.6 85.0 8.8 43.7 11.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 200 0 204 119 318 83
Queue Length 95th (ft) 271 82 m0 m206 m241 m93
Internal Link Dist (ft) 435 704 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 360 100
Base Capacity (vph) 2332 1033 299 3315 1234 719
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.58 0.76 0.44 0.57 0.33
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Diamond Blvd & Burnett Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 431 121 108 26 72 171 447 24 554 273 v/c Ratio 1.32 0.54 0.34 0.29 0.30 0.75 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.27 Control Delay 209.1 65.1 6.0 69.3 38.2 76.3 7.9 64.3 13.1 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 209.1 65.1 6.0 69.3 38.2 76.3 7.9 64.3 13.1 2.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~251 104 0 23 17 147 46 22 82 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #358 165 24 54 42 217 76 m34 169 m30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 638 649 592
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 60 150 70 243
Base Capacity (vph) 327 355 414 480 1231 324 3500 142 2078 1015 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.32 0.34 0.26 0.05 0.06 0.53 0.13 0.17 0.27 0.27 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
5: Meridian Park Blvd & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 1177 125 1559 69 71 113 31
v/c Ratio 0.14 0.37 0.69 0.42 1.35 1.39 0.47 0.24
Control Delay 76.8 4.8 89.2 3.5 291.2 304.9 14.4 37.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 76.8 4.8 89.2 3.5 291.2 304.9 14.4 37.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 46 114 54 ~82 ~86 0 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) m32 60 181 111 #191 #197 49 44
Internal Link Dist (ft) 704 867 473 127
Turn Bay Length (ft) 220 140 80
Base Capacity (vph) 285 3217 217 3737 51 51 239 412
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.37 0.58 0.42 1.35 1.39 0.47 0.08 Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
6: John Glenn Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 1103 155 1463 28 122 21 272 36 13 100 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.34 0.73 0.41 0.03 0.72 0.09 0.63 0.21 0.06 0.36 Control Delay 85.1 2.5 90.3 4.8 0.3 78.6 50.2 12.4 53.6 49.2 12.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 85.1 2.5 90.3 4.8 0.3 78.6 50.2 12.4 53.6 49.2 12.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 19 128 11 1 105 17 0 29 10 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 32 163 296 3 164 40 79 60 30 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 867 598 790 507
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 230 130 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 233 3230 363 3566 1105 355 478 608 355 478 472 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.34 0.43 0.41 0.03 0.34 0.04 0.45 0.10 0.03 0.21 Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Concord Ave & New Dr EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 1325 4 8 1573 86 13 36 81 2 78 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.33 0.00 0.06 0.41 0.07 0.09 0.18 0.59 0.01 0.35 Control Delay 54.2 3.7 0.0 67.2 10.4 3.3 54.9 8.3 75.1 52.5 15.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.2 3.7 0.0 67.2 10.4 3.3 54.9 8.3 75.1 52.5 15.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 71 0 7 346 6 11 0 70 2 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 124 m0 m13 426 28 32 20 121 10 48 Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 979 208 204
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 120 100 200 120 130
Base Capacity (vph) 155 4037 1230 155 3828 1181 434 524 429 574 541 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.33 0.00 0.05 0.41 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.19 0.00 0.14 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
8: Via De Mercados/Stanwell Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 1420 23 1516 87 55 168 294
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.39 0.12 0.44 0.53 0.23 0.55 0.72
Control Delay 90.3 5.9 37.6 1.9 69.5 2.2 65.2 16.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 90.3 5.9 37.6 1.9 69.5 2.2 65.2 16.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 101 58 19 24 74 0 74 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 162 242 m48 17 126 1 108 91
Internal Link Dist (ft) 979 569
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 110 70 160 160
Base Capacity (vph) 350 3608 324 3463 642 641 1234 746
Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.39 0.07 0.44 0.14 0.09 0.14 0.39 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
10: Lloyd Wise Dr & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 1478 7 1399 54 10
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.43 0.05 0.40 0.21 0.08
Control Delay 85.2 6.0 42.0 1.3 1.9 47.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 85.2 6.0 43.9 1.4 1.9 47.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 58 6 12 0 5
Queue Length 95th (ft) m12 70 m15 13 0 24
Internal Link Dist (ft) 569 35 148 175
Turn Bay Length (ft) 160
Base Capacity (vph) 196 3437 157 3473 289 161
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 418 110 592 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.49 0.15 0.49 0.19 0.06
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
11: Concord Ave & Bisso Ln EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1492 11 1426 6 94 92
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.44 0.08 0.42 0.03 0.54 0.54
Control Delay 87.4 0.7 51.9 6.9 0.0 68.1 68.3
Queue Delay 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 87.9 0.8 51.9 6.9 0.0 68.1 68.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 4 9 115 0 84 82
Queue Length 95th (ft) m17 8 m22 176 0 140 138
Internal Link Dist (ft) 35 756 63 203
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50
Base Capacity (vph) 194 3410 155 3427 190 431 422
Starvation Cap Reductn 100 416 00000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.50 0.07 0.42 0.03 0.22 0.22
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Commerce Ave/SR 242 & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1651 82 1153 32 55 194 642 278 270 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.54 0.41 0.25 0.40 0.69 0.81 0.55 0.54
Control Delay 37.7 61.2 15.1 63.3 68.2 24.2 57.0 17.6 16.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.7 61.2 15.1 63.3 68.2 24.2 57.0 17.6 16.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 648 55 115 27 47 14 274 63 56
Queue Length 95th (ft) #843 93 130 61 91 92 328 153 145 Internal Link Dist (ft) 756 755 965 677
Turn Bay Length (ft) 280 140 140 310
Base Capacity (vph) 1908 194 2839 168 177 311 931 559 549 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.42 0.41 0.19 0.31 0.62 0.69 0.50 0.49 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
13: Market St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1975 56 990 192 236 582
v/c Ratio 5.23dr 0.41 0.29 0.20 0.33 0.81
Control Delay 144.3 68.5 7.8 3.9 45.9 58.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 144.3 68.5 7.8 3.9 45.9 58.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~797 48 110 24 91 251
Queue Length 95th (ft) #952 93 160 65 122 297
Internal Link Dist (ft) 755 936 620
Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 130 170
Base Capacity (vph) 1554 207 3374 977 919 933
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.27 0.27 0.29 0.20 0.26 0.62
Intersection Summary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
14: Harrison St/Bonifacio St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1499 30 1052 51 18 200
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.27 0.26 0.24 0.04 0.72
Control Delay 8.2 59.0 3.8 48.4 43.6 38.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 8.2 59.0 4.1 48.4 43.6 38.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 161 23 60 37 6 71
Queue Length 95th (ft) 261 54 109 70 16 143
Internal Link Dist (ft) 936 372 420
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 60 80
Base Capacity (vph) 3642 197 3986 551 1109 559
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 2060 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.15 0.55 0.09 0.02 0.36
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Adobe St/Pacheco St & Concord Ave EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBT NBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1238 1079 91
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.30 0.31 0.48
Control Delay 59.1 3.0 7.8 50.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0
Total Delay 59.1 3.4 8.3 50.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 68 109 55
Queue Length 95th (ft) 76 92 145 109
Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 347 272
Turn Bay Length (ft) 180
Base Capacity (vph) 680 4098 3463 290
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 2121 1780 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.63 0.64 0.31
Intersection Summary

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
16: Galindo St/Concord Ave & Salvio St EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 96 81 201 36 1053 99 1084 83
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.51 0.36 0.58 0.24 0.32 0.54 0.42 0.07
Control Delay 66.0 60.2 14.7 36.9 58.4 2.8 61.5 7.6 1.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0
Total Delay 66.0 60.2 14.7 36.9 58.4 2.9 61.5 8.4 1.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 72 0 46 30 23 74 173 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 75 124 46 84 m58 56 127 249 17
Internal Link Dist (ft) 567 313 300 347
Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 70 130
Base Capacity (vph) 336 630 574 974 204 3338 212 2590 1154 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 866 0 1085 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 102 0
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.21 0.18 0.43 0.47 0.72 0.07 Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 692 72 252 231 102 932 263 881 37 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.79 0.48 0.29 0.42 0.61 0.53 0.84 0.58 0.05 Control Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 60.1 32.7 71.5 24.0 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0
Total Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 60.1 32.8 71.5 24.3 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 257 55 83 0 71 224 156 280 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 318 101 116 60 110 294 #298 401 2 Internal Link Dist (ft) 700 323 310 300
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 130 100 90 125
Base Capacity (vph) 204 971 204 978 595 204 1745 355 1525 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 0 206 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.71 0.35 0.26 0.39 0.50 0.61 0.74 0.67 0.05 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
18: Galindo St & Concord Blvd EXPP_PM
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 470 348 138 768 1018 47
v/c Ratio 0.52 0.45 0.80 0.52 0.31 0.60 0.05
Control Delay 45.9 42.0 37.8 60.1 8.6 11.3 0.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 45.9 42.0 37.8 60.1 8.6 11.3 0.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 130 118 150 54 108 56 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 176 132 229 85 195 92 m0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 319 265 310
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 640 1864 664 543 2461 1710 909
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000800
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.25 0.52 0.25 0.31 0.60 0.05
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings
17: Galindo St & Willow Pass Rd EXPP_PM_Mit
Synchro 11 Report

Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 692 72 252 231 102 932 263 881 37 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.79 0.48 0.29 0.42 0.61 0.54 0.83 0.58 0.05 Control Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 60.1 33.3 68.6 24.0 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.0
Total Delay 64.7 48.5 62.8 37.0 6.7 60.1 33.5 68.7 24.3 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 257 55 83 0 71 223 158 280 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 318 101 116 60 110 303 208 401 2 Internal Link Dist (ft) 700 323 310 300
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 130 100 90 125
Base Capacity (vph) 204 971 204 978 595 204 1732 394 1525 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 5 206 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.71 0.35 0.26 0.39 0.50 0.61 0.68 0.67 0.05 Intersection Summary

Arborist Report
2366 Stanwell Circle, Concord, CA 94520
January 12, 2022
815 Court St #671
Martinez, CA 94553
www.matherstreeservice.com
Contact: Mitchell Mathers
925-372-3649 Telephone
[email protected]
Attachment 5

2 January 12, 2022
2366 Stanwell Circle, Concord, CA
To whom it may concern,
This report has been requested by Denise Findley of Rio Vista Farms. Please see the following for site plan and detailed report on the trees located at 2366 Stanwell Circle in Concord.

Best Regards,
Mitchell Mathers
ISA Certified Arborist WE-10204A
[email protected]

3 Tree 1: removeBottlebrush15.5”
Tree 2: removeHolly Oak11.5”
Tree 3: removeBottlebrush 9”
Tree 4: removeBottlebrush 17” Tree 5: remove
Bottlebrush 13.5”
Tree 6: removeBottlebrush 10”
Tree 7: removeBottlebrush 11.5”
Tree 8: removeHolly Oak 11”
Tree 9: removeHolly Oak 7.3”
Tree 10: keepPalm
Tree 11: removeHolly Oak 10.5”
Tree 12: removeYellow Poplar12”
2366 Stanwell Circle

4 Tree Description:

See site plan for tree types and sizes
Condition and Recommendation:

The owners of 2366 Stanwell recently
purchased this property and have plans to
re-do the landscaping. Major landscaping
and construction around trees always causes
stress and destabilization due to root
excavation and soil disruption. Many of the
trees are already showing signs of damage
and decay. The trees should be removed
before construction begins and replaced with a
suitable species for the location.

They have elected to keep the palm tree, which
is fine as it has grass-like fiberous roots and
can easily be protected during construction.

Trees 1-3
Tree 4 Trees 5-6

5 Tree 6 - showing damaged bark Trees 7-11
Tree 11 Tree 12

From: Debbie Cheung
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: FW: Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) - (PL21109)
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 8:51:11 PM
Importance: High
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
Dear Sir/Madam:

RE: KoKaboration (CoCo Farms) – PL21109 – Public Hearing on March 16, 2022 Problem 1) SAFETY
We work at a building on Stanwell Drive, and it would be dangerous to walk from the office to the cars in the parking lot or by the office on Stanwell Drive.

Problem 2) NOT ENOUGH PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS OR EMPLOYEES In the “CoCo Farms” application, they are planning to hire 100 employees and apply for 85 parking permits for off-street parking.

Currently, the off-street parking is already a problem. We counted 61 parking spaces in the planning documents.

Stanwell Circle is a narrow semi-circular street. Accommodating parking for 85 vehicles on their own property is impossible.

Are they planning to spill over to adjacent parking lots? Where is the rest of us going to park? Problem 3) CRIMES
There have been numerous reports of robberies of cannabis stores in the Bay Area, person shot multiple times in the CoCo Farms parking lot in Antioch, burglary and gun violence in the neighborhood around cannabis retail stores. We do not want a cannabis store anywhere near Contra Costa County’s WIC for women and children, the trucks for food bank deliveries, a dialysis company, a gym, an education company, and California school association.

Problem 4) SMELL – HEALTH ISSUES
The smells of people smoking marijuana is very strong. We have the freedom to stay away from marijuana smoke, like second-hand cigarette smoke. People who are sensitive to marijuana smoke would become extremely tired. That would affect work productivity and well-being.

Thanks!
Debbie C.

Attachment 6

From: Debbie Cheung
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Public Comments Regarding Kolaboration (CoCo Forms) (PL21109) Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 8:54:11 PM
Importance: High
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
Dear City of Concord:

I am writing about the project involving 2366
Stanwell Circle, Concord, California.

I believe that a proposed marijuana mini-farm and
retail store are being are being considered for 2366
Stanwell Circle.

These types of businesses can be associated with such
public safety issues as crime, burglaries, armed
robberies shootings, vandalism, and parking problems.

I run a business called INR (Institute for Natural
Resources) at 2354 Stanwell Drive, Concord, CA
94520. I believe the project at 2366 Stanwell Circle
would jeopardize the health and safety of INR’s
employees.

I wish to let the City of Concord know that INR
cannot support any project that would jeopardize the
health and safety of INR’s employees, many of whom
are women.

Over the last several years, INR’s vehicles have been
vandalized -- whether parked in INR’s parking lot on
Stanwell Circle or parked on Stanwell Drive or
Stanwell Circle.

The City of Concord must not do anything to diminish
public safety.

Sincerely,
Richard S. Colman

President
INR

From: Debbie Cheung
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: Brian Ripley
Subject: FW: Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) - (PL21109)
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 9:29:37 PM
Attachments: BestOfOakland2020LogoBlack copy.png
BestOfOakland2019LogoPink copy email size.png
BestOfOakland2018LogoTurquoise email.png
Dear Sir/Madam:

I write on behalf of my firm's client, the Institute for Natural Resources (“INR”), a 501(c)(3) organization located at 2354 Stanwell Circle. INR is located across the street from Kolaboration’s proposed cannabis “micro business” with a retail storefront at 2366 Stanwell Circle, Concord, California.

As an employer of a primarily women-based workforce, INR’s management has substantial concerns regarding increased safety risks to INR's staff that a cannabis-based business across the street would create. In particular, many of these employees are afraid they could become victims of crime while walking to and from their cars along Stanwell Circle, especially after dark.

It is well established that Bay Area’s based cannabis businesses are a common target for criminal activity, including robbery, burglary, assault, vandalism, and gun-related violence.

Please see below links to recent articles involving such activity in the Bay Area:
https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/article/armed-robbers-take-millions-cannabismayhem-in-oakland/ https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/bay-area-pot-shops-face-mob-robberies-get-little-help/ https://www.ktvu.com/news/oakland-cannabis-business-hit-twice-in-back-to-back-burglaries https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/cars-allegedly-casing-oakland-cannabis-businessessought-by-police/ https://oaklandside.org/2022/01/10/caravans-of-burglars-keep-striking-oaklands-cannabisindustry/ https://www.nytimespost.com/spate-of-robberies-in-san-francisco-bay-area-threatens-thesurvival-of-cannabis-shops/ https://mjbizdaily.com/new-rash-of-california-cannabis-robberies-threaten-survival-of-somebusinesses/ One recent article posted in a cannabis-based publication, MJBizDaily, linked above, stated:
“A spate of violent robberies targeting marijuana businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area last month have thrown into question the survival of several small businesses, with the combined losses of those operators estimated to be at least $5 million. The crimes ranged from break-ins that resulted minor damage to, in some instances, wild gunfights between criminals and security guards, according to media reports and sources.” The author continued:
“The prime takeaway from the most recent rash of thefts and vandalizations, insiders said, is the fragility of the companies targeted and the fact that they’re targeted with disturbing regularity by criminals looking to make an easy buck.”

As indicated, it is common that cannabis-based businesses are subject to multiple robberies or similar criminal events, not surprising since the businesses are largely cash-based and sell products that are easily re-sold on the street. One Oakland-based owner stated his businesses had been target 10 times since he opened. Unfortunately, it is likely inevitable that Concord residents, business owners and non-profit organizations will be subjected to similar instances of “cannabis mayhem” if the proposed business at 2366 Stanwell Circle is approved.

Certainly the safety and welfare of the Concord community must be the primary factor in considering any business use application. And where a new business carries with it an inherent risk of increased - and potentially violent - crime, that business should not be permitted to open.

Based on the foregoing, on behalf of our client and other businesses we represent in the Stanwell Circle area, I respectfully urge the planning department to reject the permit application of Kolaboration (CoCo Farms).

Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions or comments.

Respectfully,
Brian A. Ripley
Law Office of Brian A. Ripley
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
Ph: (510) 596-1745/Fax: (510) 596-1746
[email protected]
www.brianaripley.com
www.linkedin.com/in/brianripley/
IMPORTANT - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are private and confidential and are solely for the use of the addressee. It may contain material which is legally privileged. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering to the addressee, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use of it is strictly prohibited. If this is a general posting to a listserv or other public forum, the information contained herein is not intended as general legal advice and no one is entitled to rely on the contents. If this is a response to a request for information, the contents are a general response not intended as legal advice.

WARNING - E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message arising as a result of email transmission.This e-mail message and any documents accompanying this transmission may contain confidential information and are intended solely for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended addressee/recipient, any use of, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this email information is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission and immediately delete/destroy the message and any accompanying documents

COVID-19 NOTICE:

The health and well-being of our clients and our community is of great importance to the firm.

Please note that we will continue to work remotely for an indefinite period.

We will be OPEN during business hours and operations will continue as normal including phone, emails, and mail handling. We are offering Zoom video conference or phone options for all meetings. During this time, we will be using email as the primary means of sending correspondence. If you prefer to receive a hard copy as well, please let us know and we will make sure this is provided. If you need to drop something off at the office or effectuate service, please contact us directly to make arrangements. If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

From: Wendy Matsuda
To: [email protected]; Abejo, Frank
Subject: 2366 Stanwell Cir - Coco Farms
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 10:06:35 PM
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
Dear Mr. Abejo,
I am an employee of the Institute For Natural Resources located at 2354 Stanwell Drive. Our office is just around the corner from the proposed site of Kolaboration Cannabis (Coco Farms) microbusiness at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

To say I am concerned of my future safety once the marijuana farm/dispensary opens is an understatement.

From what I've read on the Public Hearing notice, a microbusiness includes both a grow operation and retail storefront, among other things.

Coco Farms is actually going to GROW MARIJUANA ON THE PREMISES?!? THIS

PLACE IS JUST ASKING FOR AN ARMED ROBBERY BY ORGANIZED CRIME AND DRUG GANGS.

I am an Oakland resident and heard horror stories (news stories) about robberies, shootings, and crime at the Oakland dispensaries. You only have to Google search for "Oakland cannabis robberies" and you will get hundreds of listings.

How will the city of Concord prevent what happens in Oakland from happening here? Do you even have enough police officers to patrol the area and keep it crime-free? Our cargo van has been hit countless times for gas theft, catalytic converter theft, and vandalism. Opening Coco Farms will just add more problems to an already high crime area.

There is a Concord Public Health Cinic for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) just across the street from the proposed site, and just across the parking lot is Crossfit Overwatch.

A marijuana farm is the wrong fit for this health-conscious neighborhood.

I am worried that there will be shoot-outs once Coco Farms opens and criminals find out and decide to rob the place. It's not a matter of IF, but WHEN.

Also, Coco Farms hopes to hire 100 people, which is great, but where are they going to park? That parking lot is not big enough for all their employees, much less their

patrons. They're going to take up the street parking as well as our parking spaces, as what often happens when the Health Clinic offers a farmer's market. We don't mind health clinic customers, but we don't want druggies in our parking lot or in our alley way, smoking up a storm, since they won't be able to smoke at Coco Farm's parking lot.

I am certain that Coco Farms and/or their customers will cause all sorts of trouble for neighboring businesses.

I am also concerned that if they are to "manufacture" or otherwise process, bake, or dry marijuana products, that the smells might permeate our offices and make us sick.

Is there a plan in place to handle potential air quality issues? What about pesticides? Are they going to use pesticides in their grow operation? Should the EPA be involved?
Please reconsider and do not allow a marijuana microbusiness to open at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Wendy Matsuda

From: Brian Ripley
To: Abejo, Frank
Cc: Debbie Cheung; RICHARD COLMAN
Subject: 2366 Stanwell Circle Cannabis Business Proposal Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 12:49:24 PM
Attachments: BestOfOakland2020LogoBlack copy.png
BestOfOakland2019LogoPink copy email size.png
BestOfOakland2018LogoTurquoise email.png
Dear Mr. Abejo:

I write to supplement the March 11, 2022 email to you from Richard Colman, president my firm's client, the Institute for Natural Resources, a 501(c)(3) organization located at 2354 Stanwell Circle.

As an employer of a primarily women-based workforce, Mr. Colman and INR’s management have substantial concerns regarding safety risks to INR's staff that a cannabis-based business across the street would create.

It is well established that Bay Area’s based cannabis businesses are a common target for criminal activity, including robbery, burglary, assault, vandalism, and gun-related violence.

Please see below links to recent articles involving such activity in the Bay Area:
https://www.cannabisbusinesstimes.com/article/armed-robbers-take-millions-cannabismayhem-in-oakland/ https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/bay-area-pot-shops-face-mob-robberies-get-little-help/ https://www.ktvu.com/news/oakland-cannabis-business-hit-twice-in-back-to-back-burglaries https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/cars-allegedly-casing-oakland-cannabis-businessessought-by-police/ https://oaklandside.org/2022/01/10/caravans-of-burglars-keep-striking-oaklands-cannabisindustry/ https://www.nytimespost.com/spate-of-robberies-in-san-francisco-bay-area-threatens-thesurvival-of-cannabis-shops/ It is respectfully submitted that Concord, its residents, business owners and non-profit organizations would most certainly be subjected to similar instances of “cannabis mayhem” if the proposed business at 2366 Stanwell Circle is approved. Certainly the safety and welfare of Concord community must be the primary factor in considering any business use application.

Based on the foregoing, on behalf of our client and other businesses we represent in the Stanwell Circle area, I respectfully urge the planning department to reject the permit application of Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) for a cannabis micro business with storefront retail at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions or comments.

Respectfully,
Brian A. Ripley
Law Office of Brian A. Ripley
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612

Ph: (510) 596-1745/Fax: (510) 596-1746
[email protected]
www.brianaripley.com
www.linkedin.com/in/brianripley/
IMPORTANT - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are private and confidential and are solely for the use of the addressee. It may contain material which is legally privileged. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering to the addressee, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use of it is strictly prohibited. If this is a general posting to a listserv or other public forum, the information contained herein is not intended as general legal advice and no one is entitled to rely on the contents. If this is a response to a request for information, the contents are a general response not intended as legal advice.

WARNING - E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message arising as a result of email transmission.This e-mail message and any documents accompanying this transmission may contain confidential information and are intended solely for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended addressee/recipient, any use of, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this e-mail information is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission and immediately delete/destroy the message and any accompanying documents COVID-19 NOTICE:

The health and well-being of our clients and our community is of great importance to the firm.

Please note that we will continue to work remotely for an indefinite period.

We will be OPEN during business hours and operations will continue as normal including phone, emails, and mail handling. We are offering Zoom video conference or phone options for all meetings. During this time, we will be using email as the primary means of sending correspondence. If you prefer to receive a hard copy as well, please let us know and we will make sure this is provided. If you need to drop something off at the office or effectuate service, please contact us directly to make arrangements. If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

From: Mark Nelson
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: John Galloway
Subject: PL21109 Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) Cannabis Microbusiness with Storefront Retail Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 12:23:16 PM
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
Dear Planning Commission:

My company is the owner of record at 2430 Stanwell Drive. We have been an employer in Concord for over 25 years, and have owned the property at 2430 Stanwell Drive for approximately 15 years.

We sit directly behind the above proposed business at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

In the 15 years on Stanwell Drive, we have experienced a number of car break ins, stolen security cameras, stolen copper wire from our building and stealing of our pallets and material from our recycling bin. Most recently, a fire broke out last summer late on a Sunday evening on the empty lot of our property and the adjacent property on the corner of Stanwell Circle and Stanwell Drive. The cause was unknown but was suspected to be a cigarette or other ignition from the homeless that live in the canal across the street. We were lucky not to lose the entire neighborhood. We also have a number of homeless that live in their RV’s on our street.

This past week, you may have heard about a gentleman that was smoking marijuana on the property of another business on Stanwell Circle (where the dispensary is proposed) and when asked to leave, had a gun pulled on him.

Most of the crime has happened after the M-F hours of 8-5 because this is a zoned office business park. On weekends and after hours this neighborhood is often deserted and presents a great opportunity for crime.

Having a retail outlet for marijuana in this business park is going to attract more crime and undesirable behavior. Every dispensary that I have seen usually has bars on the windows and other high security deterrence like razor wire and other security measures. Proof that they are a major target of crime.

I want to go on record that I strongly disagree with allowing a retail outlet for Marijuana in this business park because it will be a nuisance, and bring more crime, transients and homeless hanging around looking for opportunities similar to the above described.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Mark Nelson
Force Flow / Halogen
2430 Stanwell Dr.

Concord CA 94520 USA
(800) 893-6723
(925) 686-6700
Fax (925) 686-6713
Skype: forceflowmark
www.forceflowscales.com – Chlorine & Chemical Feed Scales www.halogenvalve.com – Chlorine Emergency Shut Off Systems

From: Mark Nelson
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: John Galloway
Subject: RE: PL21109 Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) Cannabis Microbusiness with Storefront Retail Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 12:30:19 PM
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
Further to my email of below referencing the Gun pulled on neighboring security.

Man Pulls Out Gun, Threatens Security Guard On
Stanwell Drive In Concord
MARCH 1, 2022 14:58 PM · 19 COMMENTS
Concord Police are investigating a report of a man seen with a gun on Stanwell Drive this afternoon.

The incident occurred in the 2300 block of Stanwell when a guy who was smoking pot in the parking lot of a business was asked to leave.

The guy then got out of his vehicle holding a gun.

The man ended up leaving in a gray, two-door Chevrolet with tinted windows.

No injuries were reported.

Sincerely,
Mark Nelson
Force Flow / Halogen
2430 Stanwell Dr.

Concord CA 94520 USA
(800) 893-6723
(925) 686-6700
Fax (925) 686-6713
Skype: forceflowmark
www.forceflowscales.com – Chlorine & Chemical Feed Scales www.halogenvalve.com – Chlorine Emergency Shut Off Systems

From: Mark Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: John Galloway <[email protected]>
Subject: PL21109 Kolaboration (CoCo Farms) Cannabis Microbusiness with Storefront Retail Dear Planning Commission:

My company is the owner of record at 2430 Stanwell Drive. We have been an employer in Concord for over 25 years, and have owned the property at 2430 Stanwell Drive for approximately 15 years.

We sit directly behind the above proposed business at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

In the 15 years on Stanwell Drive, we have experienced a number of car break ins, stolen security cameras, stolen copper wire from our building and stealing of our pallets and material from our recycling bin. Most recently, a fire broke out last summer late on a Sunday evening on the empty lot of our property and the adjacent property on the corner of Stanwell Circle and Stanwell Drive. The cause was unknown but was suspected to be a cigarette or other ignition from the homeless that live in the canal across the street. We were lucky not to lose the entire neighborhood. We also have a number of homeless that live in their RV’s on our street.

This past week, you may have heard about a gentleman that was smoking marijuana on the property of another business on Stanwell Circle (where the dispensary is proposed) and when asked to leave, had a gun pulled on him.

Most of the crime has happened after the M-F hours of 8-5 because this is a zoned office business park. On weekends and after hours this neighborhood is often deserted and presents a great opportunity for crime.

Having a retail outlet for marijuana in this business park is going to attract more crime and undesirable behavior. Every dispensary that I have seen usually has bars on the windows and other high security deterrence like razor wire and other security measures. Proof that they are a major target of crime.

I want to go on record that I strongly disagree with allowing a retail outlet for Marijuana in this business park because it will be a nuisance, and bring more crime, transients and homeless hanging around looking for opportunities similar to the above described.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Mark Nelson
Force Flow / Halogen
2430 Stanwell Dr.

Concord CA 94520 USA
(800) 893-6723
(925) 686-6700
Fax (925) 686-6713
Skype: forceflowmark
www.forceflowscales.com – Chlorine & Chemical Feed Scales www.halogenvalve.com – Chlorine Emergency Shut Off Systems

From: Stanford Holmgren
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: Eric Rehn; Chuck Wesley
Subject: Item 6B City of Concord Planning Commission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 2:02:41 PM
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.” My name is Stanford Holmgren and I am writing in response to apparent opposition from tenants of a neighboring building to the permit application from Kolaboration. I am the managing partner for the ownership group of both 2355, occupied by WIC and 2366 leased by kolaboration.

As landlord for both properties I will not comment on the accuracy of complaints by one tenant to the other.

I must, however, question the platform or standing from which these complaints come. The County does not have a lease on 2355 Stanwell Circle. This has been as they have wanted. They have been on a month to month tenancy for years as they look for a new home for WIC. Their reason being that the location does not best serve their client base.

It does seem presumptuous for a tenant without a lease who doesn’t want to be there to challenge a tenant with a lease who does want to be there.

Prior to the pandemic, when we began lease negotiations with Kolaboration, as part of our due diligence, we would have consulted the County over any concerns. We did not because they were planning to move. Together we identified several major repairs which the building at 2355 Stanwell Circle needed, and we were prepared to do. By mutual consent the repairs were delayed to a more convenient time after the tenant vacated.

Certainly the pandemic has slowed many processes down, but I have heard nothing to indicate that the County has changed their plans to move WIC to another location.

Sincerely
Stanford Holmgren

From: Eric Rehn
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: PC Meeting March 16, 2022 - Public Hearings 6B - Kolaboration Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 9:07:34 AM
Attachments: image001.png
I am a commercial real estate broker and represent the ownerships of 2366 Stanwell Circle, 2340- 2346 Stanwell Circle, 2355 Stanwell Circle, 2399 Stanwell Drive, and 2331-2341 Stanwell Drive and am writing this letter in support of approving the UP, AP, VA, DR, and DA for the Kolaboration Cannabis Microbusiness at 2366 Stanwell Circle.

A tenant in 2355 Stanwell Circle has voiced opposition to Kolaboration’s use, but I would like to point out that the particular tenant that is opposing is on a month to month lease and has indicated to the ownership that they are planning to move. This notice of their intention not to extend was given far in advance of Kolaboration applying for permits. It is hard to understand their opposition when they have clearly stated to their landlord that they are planning to move to an area better suited to providing the social services for their cliental.

I would also like to note that the WIC store that was located at 2346 Stanwell Circle vacated well over a year ago and the space is occupied by an industrial tenant. There is no WIC store in the area.

The majority of property owners in the area believe that the heightened security provided by Kolaboration’s use will help reduce petty crime in the area too.

Thank you.

Eric Rehn
Vice President
925.784.3449 Cell / 925.849.8607 Direct
[email protected]
DRE #01365267
1850 Gateway Boulevard
Suite 130
Concord, CA 94520
Listings: https://www.kennedywilsonservices.com/node/98/listings Bio: https://www.kennedywilsonservices.com/rehn
Press: https://www.kennedywilsonservices.com/node/98/press This message, sent by Kennedy-Wilson Properties, Ltd., is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, confidential or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this message by you is prohibited.

Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient

and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware.

From: Lori Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]; Abejo, Frank <[email protected]> Subject: Kolaboration/CoCo Farms’ (PL21109) cannabis microbusiness application at 2366 Stanwell Cir, Concord, CA
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”

3-15-2022
RE: Kolaboration/CoCo Farms’ (PL21109) cannabis microbusiness application at 2366 Stanwell Cir, Concord, CA
To Whom It May Concern, Frank Abejo:

I am an older female, and I work nearby to the proposed address for this project. I work on Stanwell Drive.

I am worried about many issues that could arise with this type of business in our area that could cause all sorts of problems and safety issues, that I've heard about in other areas:

Increased crime (smash and grabs, burglaries, armed robberies, shootings, vandalism, loitering)

There is the potential of collateral damage, mainly shootings during robberies and car crashes during the getaways.

Noxious fumes from patrons and manufacturing process,
Parking shortages, and more.

The proposed location is very near both the Concord Public Health Clinic and WIC (Women, Infants, & Children), both on Stanwell Circle.

I don't think that a marijuana farm/manufacturer/store should ever be located near a health clinic.

On Wednesdays, low-income families and people go to pick up food (I think through the CalFresh program) at the Concord Public Health Clinic, and they would be exposed to all of the problems and and safety issues that I listed above, as well.

Hopefully a better place can be found for this proposed business.

Thank you very much,
Lori Lopez
Email: [email protected]

From: RICHARD COLMAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Aliano, Dominic <[email protected]>; Barone, Valerie <[email protected]>
Subject: MARIJUANA STORE IN CONCORD, CA
March 21, 2022
Mr. Dominic Aliano
Mayor
Ms. Valerie Baron
City Manager
City of Concord
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519
Dear Mayor Aliano and City Manager Barone:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to a
proposed marijuana store at 2366 Stanwell Circle in
Concord, California, or any location nearby that
address.

I am the president of INR (Institute for Natural
Resources) at 2354 Stanwell Drive, Concord, CA 94520.

Marijuana stores are easily associated with such public safety issues as burglaries, armed robberies,
shootings, murders, vandalism, and other crimes. There
can be parking problems.

I believe the project at 2366 Stanwell Circle would
jeopardize the health and safety of INR’s employees.

I wish to let the City of Concord know that INR cannot
support any project that would jeopardize the health
and safety of INR’s employees, many of whom are women.

Over the last several years, INR’s vehicles have been
vandalized -- whether parked in INR’s parking lot on
Stanwell Circle or parked on Stanwell Drive or Stanwell Circle.

The City of Concord must not do anything to diminish
public safety.

I encourage you to do everything possible to prevent
the establishment of a marijuana store in or near 2366
Stanwell Circle.

I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,
Richard S. Colman
President
INR
2354 Stanwell Drive
Concord, CA 94520
TEL (925) 609-2820 ext. 203
FAX (925) 363-7798
E-mail: [email protected]

From: RICHARD COLMAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:26 AM
To: Aliano, Dominic <[email protected]>; Barone, Valerie <[email protected]>
Subject: MARIJUANA STORE IN CONCORD, CA
March 21, 2022
Mr. Dominic Aliano
Mayor
Ms. Valerie Baron
City Manager
City of Concord
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519
Dear Mayor Aliano and City Manager Barone:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to a
proposed marijuana store at 2366 Stanwell Circle in
Concord, California, or any location nearby that
address.

I am the president of INR (Institute for Natural
Resources) at 2354 Stanwell Drive, Concord, CA 94520.

Marijuana stores are easily associated with such public safety issues as burglaries, armed robberies,
shootings, murders, vandalism, and other crimes. There
can be parking problems.

I believe the project at 2366 Stanwell Circle would
jeopardize the health and safety of INR’s employees.

I wish to let the City of Concord know that INR cannot
support any project that would jeopardize the health
and safety of INR’s employees, many of whom are women.

Over the last several years, INR’s vehicles have been
vandalized -- whether parked in INR’s parking lot on
Stanwell Circle or parked on Stanwell Drive or Stanwell Circle.

The City of Concord must not do anything to diminish
public safety.

I encourage you to do everything possible to prevent
the establishment of a marijuana store in or near 2366
Stanwell Circle.

I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,
Richard S. Colman
President
INR
2354 Stanwell Drive
Concord, CA 94520
TEL (925) 609-2820 ext. 203
FAX (925) 363-7798
E-mail: [email protected]

TRANSPORTATION

44. Comply with the recommendations from the Traffic Study prepared by Fehr & Peers dated February 22, 2022, including but not limited to:
a. Applicant shall contribute to the retiming of the Galindo Street and Willow Pass Road traffic signal to provide additional green light time for the southbound left turn movement.

Prior to issuance of development or building permit, whichever comes first , the applicant shall deposit a sum of $10,000 into a trust account to be used for the purposes of retiming the signal and recalibrating adjacent signals to maintain smooth traffic flow. (TRAN/PLNG)

PARKING

45. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or site development permit, whichever comes first occupancy approval, the Applicant shall perform one of the following:
a. Execution of an Off-Site Parking Agreement in a form acceptable to the City for review and approval by the Planning Division and City Attorney. The agreement shall guarantee that the property owner(s) of parcels 112-252-021 and -022 dedicate the parking located on these parcels for the sole use of CoCo Farms and/or the tenant(s) of 2366 Stanwell Circle; or
b. Application for a Parcel Merge of parcels 112-252-021, -022 and -006 for review and approval by Engineering Service and Planning Division.

The Agreement or Parcel Merge shall be recorded with Contra Costa County prior to building occupancy. (PLNG/ENGR)

46. Parking shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.160 “Parking, Loading, and Access”, including motorcycle and bicycle parking spaces, drive aisle and parking space dimensions, turning radii, back-out dimensions, driveway clearances, landscape median dimensions, and other relevant information. (ENGR, PLNG) CMC

LANDSCAPING

47. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed per the approved landscape plan except as modified by these conditions. (PLNG)

48. Prior to an application for site utility work or site development, whichever occurs first, applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to provide shade trees at a minimum size of 24-inch box. Trees shall be planted in parking areas so that 50 percent shading of parking lot pavement is achieved within 10 years. At a minimum, one 24-inch box shade tree shall be provided for every five parking spaces. Changes to the landscape plan and this requirement may be approved by the Planning Division, in consultation with the Police

Agenda Item No. 5.a
Benched Exhibit A to
Attachment 1 Page 53 of
361

Kolaboration Concord LLC (“CoCo Farms”)
Cannabis Microbusiness with Storefront Retail
Frank Abejo, Principal Planner
City Council Public Hearing
April 12, 2022
Agenda Item 5.a

Presentation Overview
I. Background
II. Project Summary
III. Entitlements
IV. Development Agreement
V. Environmental/CEQA Determination
VI. Recommendation
2

I. Background
2020
May 26. City Council adopts cannabis ordinance.

July 28. Council approved the competitive selection process.

October 5. Request for Proposals (RFP) issued.
3

I. Background
2021
April 13. Council interviews microbusiness applicants, selecting Kolaboration Concord LLC (“CoCo Farms”) as one of two applicants to continue through the licensing and land use process.
Microbusiness means a cannabis business allowed to engage in the cultivation of cannabis on an area less than 10,000 square feet and to act as a licensed distributor…A microbusiness shall engage in at least three of these four commercial cannabis activities: retail, distribution, manufacturing, or cultivation.
4

I. Background
2021
June 11. CoCo Farms submits applications; deemed incomplete.

September 23. CoCo Farms resubmits revised plans; deemed incomplete.

December 9. Design Review Board reviewed the project and recommended Final Design and Site Review approval, subject to conditions.
5

I. Background
2022
January 13. CoCo Farms submitted revised plans to address Design Review Board comments and outstanding completeness items.

February 11. Application deemed complete.

March 26. Planning Commission recommends approval of the project subject to conditions that includes replacement of chain link gates for the trash enclosure with decorative gates.
 Comments received mainly focused on safety concerns.
6

I. Background
7 Location
Address: 2366 Stanwell Circle
(three parcels)
General Plan: Business Park
(BP)
Zoning: Office Business Park
(OBP)

II. Project Summary
• Occupy approximately 14,000 square feet of an existing 19,000 square foot building for the following cannabis operations: 1,700 square feet for manufacturing, 3,400 square feet for distribution, and approximately 6,500 square feet of storefront retail. No cultivation proposed.
• Operate daily 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
• Project will employ 100 full-time staff primarily hired from the Concord community. • Improvements to the interior.
• Minor improvements to building exterior and site.
8

II. Project Summary
• Approvals required for the project:
Use Permit: Excess parking
Variance: Fence height
Administrative Permit: Land use
Design and Site Review: Building and site improvements Development Agreement
9

III. Entitlements (Use Permit)
Project proposes 86 parking spaces where a maximum 51
parking spaces allowed.
10

III. Entitlements (Use Permit)
Use Permit to authorize excess permit subject to findings that includes compliance with parking lot landscaping.

Condition of Approval #48: Prior to an application for site utility work or site development, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to provide shade trees at a minimum size of 24-inch box. Trees shall be planted in parking areas so that 50 percent shading of parking lot pavement is achieved within ten years. At a minimum, one 24-inch box shade tree shall be provided for every five parking spaces. Changes to the landscape plan and this requirement may be approved by the Planning Division, in consultation with the Police Department and Transportation Division, to provide security and circulation needs for the project while meeting the applicable landscape standards to the greatest extent practicable. Modified plans shall include a written justification for the changes and submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of a site development permit. 11

III. Entitlements (Variance)
Project proposes seven-foot tall metal picket fence within 20-foot front setback area where a fence height of three feet is typically allowed. 12

III. Entitlements (Administrative Permit)
Conditions of Approval
• Land use authorized (type of use and scale)
• Hours of operation
• General development and use standards
• Standards applicable to cannabis operations generally • Standards for specific cannabis operations (manufacturing, distribution, and storefront retail)
13

III. Entitlements (Design and Site Review)
Project proposes minor modifications and upgrades to exterior of building and site.

Architecture
14

III. Entitlements (Design and Site Review)
Landscaping
15

III. Entitlements (Design and Site Review)
Other Improvements
16

IV. Development Agreement
• Term: Five years, automatic two-year extension; discretionary fiveyear extension. • Developer Contributions:
• One Percent of Gross Revenues or $25,000/month (whichever is greater) to Cannabis Community Benefit Fund.
• Five Percent of Gross Revenues or $50,000/month, whichever is greater towards General Fund.
• Volunteer Hours:
• At least four volunteer hours per Cannabis Business Owner and per on-site employee each month.
17

IV. Development Agreement
• Labor and Social Diversity:
• Labor Peace Agreement with United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 5.
• Hiring preference for Concord residents and persons experiencing homelessness in Concord.
• Program for hiring and providing interim housing for at least ten individuals who are near homeless or are experiencing homelessness in Concord, with a living wage, training, and health care provided to such individuals.
• Provide a wage of at least $15 per hour, with at least 80% of employees (including all “budtenders”) earning at least $20 per hour. • Neighborhood Compatibility:
• Provides complaint mitigation, community engagement, and partnership with existing Concord businesses.
18

IV. Development Agreement (Applicable Laws)
• Provides vested rights to the applicant for land use
regulations and City cannabis rules.
• Any new laws restricting the sale of cannabis accessories or prohibiting the operation of cannabis businesses would not apply to this business.
19

IV. Development Agreement (Findings)
• Consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. • In conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices.
• Will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City.
• Will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.
• Consistent with California Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5.
20

V. Environmental/CEQA
Proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to following CEQA Guidelines:
• Section 15301 (“Existing Facilities”);
• Section 15302 (“Replacement or Reconstruction”);
• Section 15303 (“New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”);
• Section 15304 (“Minor Alterations to Land”); and
• Section 15305 (“Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations”).

No further environmental review is required.
21

VI. Recommended Action
1) Adopt a Resolution approving a Use Permit, Variance, Administrative Permit, and Design and Site Review for a cannabis microbusiness with storefront retail for Kolaboration Concord LLC at 2366 Stanwell Circle, APN 126-252-021, -022, and -006 (PL21109); and
2) Introduce an Ordinance approving a Development
Agreement between the City of Concord and Kolaboration
Concord LLC (PL21109 - UP, VA, AA, DR, DA) regarding the development of a cannabis microbusiness with storefront retail component located at 2366 Stanwell Circle; APNs 126-252- 021, -022, and -006 (PL21109) by reading of the title only and waiving further reading.
22

Questions?
23

Staff
Lieutenant Tamra Robert, Concord Police
Applicant
Chuck Wesley, Chairman/CFO
Kolaboration Ventures LLC
24

CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS OPERATORS

PRODUCING GRAND BENEFITS
• GREAT JOBS WITH BENEFITS
• COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• NEW REVENUE FOR THE CITY
• SAFE & SECURE
• GREAT SELECTION AND COMPELLING PRICES

FOR OUR CUSTOMERS

COMMUNITY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• Recently awarded Antioch’s Large Business of the Year by the Antioch Chamber of Commerce. • Lead sponsor for the Antioch Rotary.
• Lead sponsor for the two annual City-wide events in Rio Vista… Hog August Bites & Bass Derby Festival • Awarded New Business of the Year and Business of the Year by the Rio Vista Chamber of Commerce. • Antioch on a Monthly Basis Receives ~$99,000
• Contra Costa County Philanthropic Involvement
• Beat the Streets - $100,000 in 2020
• Delta Veterans Group $2,500/Month
• Antioch Sports Legends Hall of Fame $2,500/Month
• Opportunity Junction - $8,000/Month
• Loaves and Fishes ~$15,000
• CoCo Cares
• Rotary Lead Event Sponsors

GRAND BENEFITS FOR CONCORD
• 100 Good-paying jobs with benefits 90% company-paid
• Hiring preference to Concord residents
• Beautiful grounds
• $25,000 per month to the Cannabis Community Benefits Fund • $50,000 per month to the City
• Approximately 200 to 400 hours of volunteer service per month • 10 “CoCo Cares” enrollees per year

PERTAINING TO THE

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
• Please remove #47 – One Shade Tree for Every Five Parking Spaces • Meeting this requirement involves placing four trees in the center of the Customer parking lot. This converts 4 regular-sized parking spaces to compact parking spaces. • Adverse impact to parking in that it creates a potential hazard. • Adverse impact to Safety and Security in that the trees will block camera lines of sight. • The DRB considered this and did not impose it.

C P
U A
S R
T K
O I
M N
E G R

E P
M A
P R
L K
O I
Y N
E G E

BENEFITS & PARKING PRESENTED LAST YEAR

BENEFITS
• CoCo Farms Concord is an Attraction
• 100+ Living Wage Jobs
• Starting Wage $20/Hour
• Healthcare Benefits, Child Orthodontics
and Vision Plan
• Paid Time Off
• Significant Fees to City of Concord
• Beautiful Grounds
• Multiple Armed Guards 24/7

PARKING IS KEY
• Revenue & City Fees are Directly
Correlated to Parking
• Insufficient Parking is an Immediate and
Severe Security Risk & Public Nuisance
• Also Driven by Parking:
• Demonstrated Success and Tax
Payments
• Demonstrated Philanthropic Partner at a
Local Level

PARKING & SECURITY
PARKING = BENEFITS
• There is a direct correlation to city
benefits to the number of parking
spaces.
• Removing parking for trees will impact
benefits proportionally.

SECURITY & SAFETY
• Having customers and employees park on site enables our security staff to monitor, and action.
• Forcing employees and customers to park on street will:
• Create a security risk as there are no cameras on the street. • Our guards have no jurisdiction off premise.
• Trees will create a security risk on premise as they will block camera footage and security monitoring.
• Customers run risk of being robbed and employees run risk of being held up to get into the facility.

SITE SELECTION ~ IMPORTANCE OF PARKING

THE MATH BEHIND PARKING
• Minimum of 15 customer parking spots required for a meaningful Microbusiness with Storefront Retail to succeed
• Number of Parking Spots are direct correlation to Revenue and City Fees
• One Parking space is equivalent to $2,000 in collections per day
• $2,000 in Collections is $1,500 in Revenue
• $1,500 X 365 = $543,000 in Revenue/Year/Parking Space • @ 3.5% City Fee = $19,000 /year/parking space
• 15 parking spots will deliver $285,000 to the City per year • 64 parking spots will deliver $1,200,000 to the City per year • Insufficient parking will become a neighborhood nuisance

OUR PROPOSAL
• Parking for 64 Customers
• Parking for 32 Employees
• 5:1000 Parking Ratio
• Net net… More Parking = More Jobs &
More Fees
• Insufficient Parking = Neighborhood
Problems

QUESTIONS?

Staff Report
Date: April 12, 2022
To: City Council
From: Valerie J. Barone, City Manager
Reviewed by: Mark Bustillos, Chief of Police
Prepared by: Kevin Halm, Provisional Lieutenant
[email protected]
(925) 671-3336
Subject: Considering introduction of an uncodified Ordinance adopting and approving Concord Police Department Policy 706, Military Equipment Use Policy, in compliance with California Assembly Bill No. 481 (AB 481), by reading of the title only and waiving further reading.

CEQA: Not a “project” under Public Resources Code Section 21065, Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and/or 15378; in the alternative, is exempt under Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3).

Report in Brief
California Assembly Bill No. 481 (AB 481) was approved by Governor Newsom on September 30, 2021, and took effect on January 1, 2022. AB 481 requires a law enforcement agency to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, via adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy by an ordinance, prior to the agency funding, acquiring, or using Military Equipment. The process for seeking approval from the governing body shall commence prior to May 1, 2022.

Recommended Action
Introduce the Ordinance (Attachment 1) by reading of the title only and waiving further reading.

Background
AB 481 is codified in California Government Code Sections 7070 through 7075. The Concord Police Department has in its inventory, equipment that qualifies as Military

5.b

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5.b
April 12, 2022
Equipment per California Government Code 7070. The categories of Military Equipment per Government Code Section 7070 are as follows:

1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles – Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report. (Attachment 2)

2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.

5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

8. Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

9. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.

10.Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

11.Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5.b
April 12, 2022

12.“Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

13.Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

14.The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions:
40mm projectile launchers, “bean bag,” rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons - Included in the Police Department’s 2022 Military Equipment Report.

15.Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

The Police Department seeks approval to continue to use the equipment listed in the 706.4 2022 Military Equipment Report in support of police services delivered to the community and acquire new or replacement equipment in 2022 to maintain operational readiness in support of first-responder services.

In accordance with California Government Code 7071, the Police Department has created a Military Equipment Use Policy - Lexipol Draft Policy 706 (Attachment 1), as well as its included 706.4 2022 Annual Military Equipment Report.

In accordance with California Government Code 7072, the adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy by ordinance, would give the Police Department the approval from City Council to do the following:
(A) Request military equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title 10 of the United States Code.
(B) Seek funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in- kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(C) Acquire military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(D) Collaborate with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the territorial jurisdiction of the governing body.
(E) Use any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body pursuant to this chapter.

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5.b
April 12, 2022
(F) Solicit or respond to a proposal for, or enter into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, military equipment.
(G) Acquire military equipment through any means not provided by this paragraph.

Per California Government Code 7072, a Police Department that receives approval for a Military Equipment Use Policy shall submit to the governing body an annual Military Equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (referenced under 706.4 of the policy).

AB 481 requires the governing body (City Council) to annually review the ordinance for approval or disapprove a renewal of the authorization for a type, as defined, of Military Equipment or amend the Military Equipment Use Policy if the policy does not comply with the standards established by law.

The Police Department released Draft Lexipol Policy 706 to the community via its webpage on Thursday, March 10, 2022, which was more than thirty days prior to City Council’s consideration of the Agenda Item in compliance with Government Code Section 7071. The Police Department also promoted the information via its Facebook page and held an informative virtual community meeting on Thursday, March 24, 2022, in the furtherance of transparency and community partnership.

Analysis
The Military Equipment as noted in the Concord Police Department’s 2022 Inventory Report found within Lexipol Draft Policy 706, are used as a component of overall best practices for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. These items have been tested in the field, and are used by law enforcement agencies to enhance community safety and officer safety, and permit officers to deliver more effective resolutions to complex, high-risk incidents.

If the Police Department lost the ability to use these equipment items the welfare of the community and officers would be jeopardized and the Police Department’s ability to resolve problems in the community would be restricted. Furthermore, officer response options would be hindered and proven less-effective or non-effective.

The term Military Equipment, as used in AB 481, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military. Only one equipment item (ballistic fourwheeled vehicle) out of the full 2022 Inventory Report was obtained from the Federal 1033 program in 2011. The Police Department no longer obtains equipment from the Federal 1033 program.

City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5.b
April 12, 2022
The Concord Police Department is committed to using the most up to date tools and equipment to safeguard the community and many items deemed to be Military Equipment are in fact utilized by the Concord Police Department, and law enforcement agencies across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to the community.

These items provide officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations which otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. To that end, the equipment items noted in this report, and in the accompanying Military Equipment Use Policy, also provide Concord Police Officers with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its Use of Force Policy.

Financial Impact
Adoption of this Ordinance has no fiscal impact on the City.

Environmental Determination
This item is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065, CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2), and/or 15378 including subsection (b)(4). If this were determined to be a “project” for CEQA analysis, this activity falls within the "Common Sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

Public Contact
A Notice of Public Hearing was posted to the City’s bulletin board and in the East Bay Times newspaper in accordance with Government Code Sections 65853, 65856, 65090, and 65092. The City Council Agenda was posted.

Attachments

1. Ordinance Adopting Military Equipment Use Policy with Exhibit A, Concord Police Department Policy 706

2. 706.4 2022 Annual Military Equipment Report

Ord. No. 22-XX 1
ORDINANCE NO. 22-XX

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CONCORD ADOPTING AND APPROVING CONCORD POLICE
DEPARTMENT POLICY 706, MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 481 (AB 481) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. CEQA. This ordinance is not a project under CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5): Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. If a project, then the ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), under CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3), in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. No unusual circumstances exist and none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. This determination reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. The City Manager is directed to ensure that a notice of exemption is filed immediately with the County Clerk.

Section 2. Findings. The City Council of the City of Concord makes the following findings:

A. Assembly Bill 481 approved September 30, 2021 (codified as Chapter 12.8 of the California Government Code and commencing with section 7070) requires a local law enforcement agency, which would include the Concord Police Department, to have a military equipment use policy approved by the City Council prior to requesting, seeking funding for, acquiring, collaborating with other jurisdictions about the deployment of, or using military equipment.

B. The Concord Police Department Policy 706, “Military Equipment Use Policy” (the “Policy”) is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated into this Ordinance.

C. The Policy has been posted on the City’s website for at least 30 days starting on March 10, 2022.

Attachment 1

Ord. No. 22-XX 2
D. The City Council has conducted a public hearing during a regularly scheduled City Council meeting on April 12, 2022 and considered all written and verbal comments, as well as the report and presentation from staff.

E. The City Council has reviewed the Policy and finds that it meets the requirements of State law and is consistent with the City of Concord’s Mission, Vision, and Values and its Corporate Goals.

F. The City Council determines that:

1. The military equipment identified in the Policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

2. The proposed Policy attached as Exhibit A and identified will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

3. If purchasing the equipment identified in the Policy, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

Section 3. Approval of the Policy. The City Council of the City of Concord approves and adopts the Concord Police Department Policy 706, “Military Equipment Use Policy”, attached and incorporated as Exhibit A into this Ordinance. In doing so, the City Council directs that:
a. Staff is authorized to request, seek funding for, acquire, collaborate with other jurisdictions about the deployment of, and use military equipment consistent with this Policy. b. The Policy shall be maintained on the Police Department’s website page. c. Annually, the Police Department shall hold a well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting regarding the Police Department’s Policy and use of military equipment, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 7072 (b).

Ord. No. 22-XX 3
d. Annually, the City Council shall review this Ordinance, the Policy and the annual military equipment report prepared by the Police Department pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 7072 and determine by resolution whether to continue the Ordinance and Policy or to modify such Policy or initiate the repeal of the Ordinance.
e. Annually, the City Council shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 7072, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in this Ordinance.

Section 4. Severability. If any sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions of this ordinance are for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this and each section, subsection, phrase or clause of this ordinance whether or not any one or more sections, subsections, phrases or clauses may be declared invalid or unconstitutional on their face or as applied.

Section 5. This Ordinance No. 22-xx shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Ordinance, a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney’s Office shall be published once at least five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance and once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Concord. //
//
//
//
//
//

Ord. No. 22-XX 4
Section 6. Codification. The ordinance shall not be codified in the Concord Municipal Code.

Dominic Aliano
Mayor
ATTEST:

Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
(Seal)
Ordinance No. 22-xx was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord held on April 12, 2022, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on May 3, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California.

Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit A, Concord Police Department Policy 706

Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/14, All Rights
Reserved. Published with permission by Concord
Police Department
***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 1
Policy
706
Concord Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment Use Policy
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of Military Equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing Body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military Equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue service weapons. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Exhibit A to
Attachment 1

Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/14, All Rights
Reserved. Published with permission by Concord
Police Department
***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 2
Concord Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Concord Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to Military Equipment. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the Military Equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the Military Equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the Governing Body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as Military Equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all Military Equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use Military Equipment within the jurisdiction of Concord Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of Military Equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual Military Equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of Military Equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying Military Equipment for the Department:

See attachment: 706.4 Annual Military Equipment Report
706.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the Military Equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed Military Equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior

Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/14, All Rights
Reserved. Published with permission by Concord
Police Department
***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 3
Concord Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
to any public hearing concerning the Military Equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The Military Equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting Military Equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for Military Equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring Military Equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of Military Equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing Military Equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the Governing Body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of Military Equipment.
(g) Acquiring Military Equipment through any means not provided above. 706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military Equipment used by any member of this Department shall be approved for use and in accordance with this policy. Military Equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this Department, or are operating in conjunction in a law enforcement capacity with this Department, should comply with their respective Military Equipment use policies. 706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a Military Equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall submit a Military Equipment report to the Governing Body for each type of Military Equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall also make each annual Military Equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of Military Equipment in department inventory. 706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which

Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/14, All Rights
Reserved. Published with permission by Concord
Police Department
***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 4
Concord Police Department
Policy Manual
Military Equipment
the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of Military Equipment.
706.9 COMMUNITY CONCERN AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
The Chief of Police, or his/her designee, will ensure that all Concord Police Department members comply with this policy. Any person may register complaints or concerns regarding this Policy or submit a question regarding this Policy using the Citizen Report Procedure and Form available on the Concord Police Department website (www.cityofconcord.org/police).

Attachment: 706.4
Concord Police Department
2022 Annual Military Equipment Report
(DRAFT REPORT)
Attachment 2

1. Robot
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Transcend Vantage Patrol Robot. Qty: 1 Total Cost: $26,000. Battery powered, remote operated device that is equipped with non-recording cameras and two-way radio capabilities. This robot can climb stairs, open doors and be the delivery mechanism for chemical agents. Used during high-risk incidents to aid officers in the de-escalation of a situation through intelligence gathering and negotiations. The use of this equipment is limited to trained members of the CPD SWAT team. Situations that qualify for its use are high risk operations including but not limited to hostage situations, active-shooters, barricaded suspect incidents and/or high-risk warrant services and per CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management.
b. Purpose
To be used remotely to gain visual and audio information to aid in the de-escalation and resolution of high risk situations, to deliver negotiations phone, open doors, and clear buildings in search for victims, suspects and/or explosives. Before entering a structure, particularly in a tactically compromised and dangerous situation, knowledge of a subject’s location is critical and the robot can provide this situational awareness without placing undue risk to human life. Cameras can also help determine if a subject is armed and also if there are other subjects inside that need assistance. The two-way speakers can be used to facilitate communication, and determine resistance level which aids in the planning and decision making by officers. c. Authorized Use:

CPD SWAT officers under the supervision of the Tactical/Incident Commander, who have completed the required training are permitted to operate the robot. Deployment missions related to SWAT are outlined within CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management. The SWAT team undergoes an estimated 120 hours of training per year and the use of the robot during training is included within these hours. Such use includes the clearing of a home after a barricaded suspect has been taken into custody in order to search for explosive hazards or other hidden victims or suspects prior to officers entering the home to search and deem the residence safe to occupy. SWAT officers receive specific training from the manufacturer on the use and operation of the robot and receive annual familiarization training with the robot. d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 10 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

No anticipated annual maintenance costs for the robot. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of new robot(s) or replacement robot(s) may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

2. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Autel Evo II Flir Radiometric UAS and Go-Command Kit. Qty: 3. Total Cost:
$39.999.00. The Evo II is a commercial-grade UAS primarily used for outdoor environments to support first responders during high-risk situations, evidence processing, search and rescue missions and other situations as outlined in CPD Policy 606- Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. The UAS is a battery powered, remote operated device with a standard and SMART controller system authorized for night operations and in compliance with FAA regulations. The UAS has a Flir thermal camera to assist for night operations and has the ability to record data. There is a flight time of approximately 35 minutes per battery, depending on weather and flight conditions. The Go-Command kit consists of a protective storage/deployment case containing power source, accessories for flight operations and a 24” LED viewing monitor.

Brinc Lemur UAS kit. Qty: 2. Total Cost: $16,498.00. The Brinc Lemur UAS is a commercial-grade UAS primarily used for indoor environments to support first responders in high-risk situations and other situations as outlined in CPD Policy 606- Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. The UAS provides remote viewing and audio data to aid in the de-escalation of high-risk incidents. The UAS is a battery powered, remote operated device with a standard controller system. The UAS is equipped with an Infrared (IR) camera system for low light conditions, cellular based two-way communications and turtle-mode for self-righting capabilities. The UAS is capable of opening doors that are ajar. There is a flight time of approximately 30 minutes per battery, and/or 10 hour perch time for communications and/or monitoring purposes without flight.

Loki MK2 UAS. Qty: 2. Total Cost: $13,771.80. The Loki is a commercial grade UAS primarily used for indoor environments to support first responders in high-risk situations by providing remote viewing and audio data to aid in the de-escalation of incidents.

The UAS may assist in other first-responder operations as outlined in CPD Policy 606- Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. The UAS is a battery powered, remote operated device with a standard controller system. The UAS is operated independently via a single controller system. There is a flight time of approximately 16 minutes, and/or 6 hours of perched battery life for monitoring purposes without flight.

EMax TinyHawk III Trainers. Qty: 0. Planned to purchase two units in 2022. Total Cost:
$800.00. The EMAX TinyHawk III is an indoor training UAS that would be used only for the purpose of teaching new UAS operators how to operate a UAS indoors. Using the inexpensive TinyHawk as a training tool while officers learn how to operate a UAS indoors will save significant wear and tear on the much more expensive Brink and Loki UAS and would insure they remain ready for operational purposes. The TinyHawk UAS is a battery powered, remote operated device with a standard controller system. There is a flight time of approximately 15 minutes per battery. b. Purpose:

UAS may be utilized to enhance the Department’s mission of protecting lives and property and for the collection of data to aid in first responder services in accordance with CPD Policy 606- Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. c. Authorized Use:

To be deployed by CPD UAS team members in accordance with CPD Policy 606- Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. All UAS team members are required to hold a Part 107 UAS remote pilot certification and team members undergo Department

led training and outside UAS training that address basic operations, indoor operations and nighttime operations. The following authorized uses of a UAS include:
 Post-incident crime scene preservation and documentation.  HAZMAT response;
 Locating individuals actively fleeing or hiding in an attempt to avoid apprehension;
 Search and rescue;
 Barricaded suspects and other high-risk tactical operations;  Locating individuals who are missing or a danger to themselves or others;  Disaster response (Flood, earthquakes, etc.);
 Training missions;
 Fire response;
 Pursuant to a search warrant;
 Any situation where the use of a UAS would enhance public safety and/or officer safety and would be deemed lawful and reasonable. d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated at 10 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance costs are $2000.00. UAS were paid from CPD existing budget and $30,000 grant funding support. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of new UAS(s) or replacement UAS(s) may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

3. Armored Rescue Vehicle
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Mamba Mk1 Armored Personnel Carrier. Qty: 1. Donation. Acquired through the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) Public Safety Procurement Program in 2011 for no cost. This equipment was painted, marked with police insignia, and equipped with police emergency lighting that was funded by community donations. The Armored Personnel Carrier is a four-wheeled, right-side driven vehicle designed to provide a high degree of ballistic protection to officers and community members during high-risk incidents and has the capability to withstand multiple bullet strikes from small arms fire.

Ford E-350 Ballistic Van. Qty: 1. Non-governmental donation. The van is a standard E-350, four-wheeled, left-hand drive vehicle that has been reinforced with a ballistic windshield, ballistic body and running boards along the side. The running boards allow for the ease and speed of officer deployments during high-risk incidents. The van is capable of withstanding multiple bullet strikes from small arms fire. b. Purpose:

To be used during high-risk incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical and high-risk incidents where such ballistic protection is required to safeguard human life. c. Authorized Use:

The use of the Mamba MK1 is strictly reserved for CPD SWAT officers who have undergone advanced armored vehicle operations driver training and assessment both

held by outside law enforcement training sessions as well as internal driver training during the estimated 120 hours of yearly training CPD SWAT undergo. The use of the E-350 ballistic van does not require any special license or training and may be used by any CPD officer with the approval of a Command Officer during high-risk incidents.

The use of the ballistic vehicles would include performing a life-saving rescue and evacuation of an officer or community member from a place of extreme danger where ballistic protection is required to safely complete the mission and not expose officers or community members to greater risk of injury or death, as well as other situations as outlined in CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management. d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 20 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance cost of $500.00.

4. Crisis Negotiations Team Van
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Ford E-450 Decommissioned Public Transportation Bus. Qty: 1. Donated to CPD by County Connection Bus Services. The bus is equipped with workstations, cabinets and white boards instead of passenger seating.
b. Purpose:

This converted bus serves as a self-contained mobile base of operations and transportation for Crisis Negotiations team members in the response to high-risk incidents in which CPD Negotiators have been requested and approved to assist by the SWAT Team Commander.
c. Authorized Use:

No specialty driver license or training is required to drive the bus. The bus is driven by members of the Crisis Negotiations Team and/or SWAT Team in response to high-risk incidents and SWAT training.
d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 15 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance cost of $500.00.

5. Tactical Dispatch Van
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Ford E-450 Decommissioned Public Transportation Bus. Qty: 1. Donated to CPD by County Connection Bus Services. The bus is equipped with workstations, cabinets and white boards instead of passenger seating.
b. Purpose:

This converted bus serves as a self-contained mobile base of operations and transportation for the Tactical Dispatch team in the response to high-risk incidents in which CPD Tactical Dispatchers have been requested and approved to assist by the SWAT Team Commander. The van also serves as a back-up mobile Dispatch Center in the event the Dispatch Center at CPD Headquarters is evacuated and dispatch services to the community cannot be delivered from CPD headquarters. Page 18 of 39 c. Authorized Use:

No advanced driver license or training is required to drive the bus. The bus is driven by members of the Tactical Dispatch team and/or SWAT Team in response to high-risk incidents and SWAT training.
d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 15 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance cost of $500.00.

6. Kinetic Breaching Tool
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Aardvark Kinetic Breaching Tool (KBT). Qty: 1. Total Cost: $9,650. The KBT utilizes a proprietary .45 caliber handgun blank to deliver up to 850 ft/lbs of force through a narrowed and hardened steel ram to force open door hinges and to aid in the breaching of fortified doors. All of the force is mechanically driven through the ram and no projectile or explosive energy leaves the device. The tool weighs 28 lbs., features an 8-round cylinder for the KBT .45 caliber blanks, and a shock reduction handle system that reduces recoil force for single person operation.
b. Purpose:

To rapidly open secured or barricaded doors in the most efficient and safest way during high-risk incidents, when manual tools such as a pry-bar or handheld ram would be less effective or non-effective.
c. Authorized Use:

CPD SWAT officers who have been trained in its use. CPD SWAT officers that are POST-Certified Breaching Instructors provide a minimum of 10 hours of breaching training to the team each year. CPD SWAT officers undergo an estimated 120 hours of training per year where such breaching capabilities is also incorporated. The situations where such use may be authorized are outlined within CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management, and would include an armed and dangerous barricaded suspect where the speed of entry into a fortified structure is paramount to aid in the safe apprehension of the suspect.
d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 10 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. e. Fiscal Impact:

CPD has an inventory of 50 blanks for this KBT at a cost of $40 per blank. There is no known annual maintenance cost for the KBT unit. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of the KPT .45 caliber blanks and/or KBT may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

Breaching Shotgun
f. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Remington 870 12 Gauge Pump Shotgun. Qty: 4. Total Cost: $1600.00. The shotgun has a tactical shortened barrel with a stand-off port to vent gasses and debris away from the operator of the firearm during firing. The breaching shotgun and frangible

rounds are used to expeditiously defeat deadbolts, locks, and hinges of doors. The frangible round is designed to transfer its energy into the lock and/or door frame and disintegrate upon impact rather than penetrate further.

Current Breaching Round Inventory
 Royal Arms TESAR-2 425 Grain Copper Frangible Breaching Round. Qty: 0.

Planned purchase in 2022 of 500 rounds. Estimated cost of $1500.00 - $2000.00.
g. Purpose:

To rapidly open secured or barricaded doors in the most efficient and safest way during high-risk incidents, when manual tools such as a pry-bar or handheld ram would be less effective or non-effective.
h. Authorized Use:

CPD SWAT officers who have been trained in their use. CPD SWAT officers undergo an estimated 120 hours of training per year where such breaching capabilities are incorporated and SWAT officers that are POST-Certified Breaching Instructors provide a minimum of 10 hours of breaching training to the team. Situations in which deployments would be authorized are outlined in CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management and would include high risk incidents where the use of the device is required in order to expeditiously gain access to a fortified location. i. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 20 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. j. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated to be $0.00 - $2000.00 per year for breaching round inventory and $500.00 annually for the shotguns. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of breaching rounds and/or breaching shotgun may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

7. Carbines
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

M4-style AR-15 shoulder-fire rifle chambered in .223 Remington (5.56 NATO) equipped with a non-magnified optic, sound suppressor, flashlight, modular handguard and adjustable sling. Qty: 135. Total Cost per unit is $2000.00. Manufactures include Colt, Bushmaster, BCM, LWRC International, and Noveske.

Ammunition:
 Training: Winchester 55gr (80,000 rounds)
 Duty: Hornady TAP 75gr BTHP (30,000 rounds)
b. Purpose:

The carbine rifle is used by trained/certified officers during situations where more precision is needed, especially at distance and beyond the capabilities of a handgun, and/or when the need to defeat soft body armor is required. c. Authorized Use:

Officers deploying a carbine rifle must have received California POST-certified training as set forth in the California Penal Code, and must meet CPD qualification Page 20 of 39 requirements which includes a yearly 4-hour recertification course and at minimum yearly qualification with the rifle. The use of this equipment is also determined by CPD Policy 300- Use of Force and CPD Policy 40- Discharge of Firearms by Police Officers. Situations that may warrant the deployment of a shoulder-fire rifle include but are not limited to situations where an officer reasonably anticipates an armed encounter, when an officer reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor and/or a situation that requires more accurate and effective long range fire.
c. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 20 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. d. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance cost of $0.00 - $2500.00 for the rifles. The estimated cost of ammunition is $0.36 per training round and $0.67 for duty round. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of ammunition and/or carbine rifles may be required during the year.

Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

Long Rifles
e. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT) LM308MWS semi-automatic, chambered in .308 Winchester (7.62x51mm NATO) equipped with a precision magnified optic, sound suppressor, and bipod. Qty: 5. Cost per unit $4000.00.

Accuracy International, model AXLE, chambered in .308 with suppressor. Qty: 0.

Planned purchase of 5 long rifles in 2022. Estimated cost per unit is $7500.00.

Accuracy International, model AXMC, chambered in .338 Lapua magnum and sound suppressor. Qty: 0. Planned purchase of 1 long rifle in 2022. Estimated total cost is $9000.00.

Ammunition:
 .308 Duty and Training: Hornady TAP 175gr BTHP (8,000 rounds)  .338 Lapua – Ruag brand 250 gr HPBT. Department plans to purchase 2000 rounds in 2022.
f. Purpose:

The long rifle is used by CPD SWAT snipers who have received extensive marksmanship training to resolve high risk situations where more precision is needed, especially at great distance, than a carbine rifle or handgun may provide, and/or when the suspect is likely to be wearing body armor. CPD SWAT sniper training includes a 40 hour basic long rifle/observer course as well as other advanced courses in addition to the estimated 120 hours of yearly training CPD SWAT officers undergo. g. Authorized Use:

Used exclusively by CPD SWAT Snipers. CPD SWAT Officers deploying a long rifle must have received California POST-certified sniper / observer training and must meet CPD SWAT qualification requirements which includes at minimum qualification 3 times per year. CPD SWAT snipers use the standardized American Sniper Association qualification standards. An example of where a long rifle would be used would be in a hostage rescue situation to provide the ability to incapacitate the suspect from a safe distance with precision without harming the

hostage. CPD SWAT snipers also operate as long range observers in tactical situations. The use of this rifle equipment is also determined by CPD Policy 300- Use of Force and CPD Policy 40- Discharge of Firearms by Police Officers, and CPD Policy 45- SWAT and Negotiations Management.
h. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 20 years for the LMT and Accuracy International, however dependent upon operational usage and wear.
i. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance costs for the long rifles is $0.00 - $1000.00. The cost of ammunition is estimated to be $1.05 - $1.50 per round. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of ammunition and/or long rifles may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

Pistol Caliber Carbine
j. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Heckler and Koch MP5 SMG chambered in 9mm equipped with a non-magnified optic, sling, and flashlight. Qty: 16. Cost per unit $2000.00.

Ammunition:
 Training: 9mm 124gr FMJ (Winchester, Federal, Hornady). 8,000 rounds designated for the MP5.
 Duty: 9mm Federal 124gr +P HST. 8,000 rounds designated for the MP5. k. Purpose:

The pistol caliber carbine is used by trained/certified officers in instances where more precision is needed, especially at distance, than a handgun may provide, but where a carbine rifle would be too large and unwieldy, such as inside a confined space (vehicle or small room).
l. Authorized Use:

Officers deploying a pistol caliber carbine must have received California POST-certified training as set forth in the California Penal Code, and must meet CPD qualification requirements which includes a yearly 4-hour recertification course and at minimum yearly qualification with the firearm. The use of this equipment is also determined by CPD Policy 300- Use of Force and CPD Policy 40- Discharge of Firearms by Police Officers. Situations that may warrant the deployment of a MP5 SMG include but are not limited to situations where an officer reasonably anticipates an armed encounter, when an officer is faced with a situation that requires more accurate and effective long range fire and/or where an officer reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect’s firepower.
m. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 20 years, however dependent upon operational usage and wear. n. Fiscal Impact:

Estimated annual maintenance cost for the MP5 SMG is $0.00 - $1000.00. The estimated cost of ammunition is $0.23 per training round and $0.31 per duty round.

Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of ammunition may be required during the year. Any such purchase

would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

8. Noise Flash Diversionary Devices
a. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:

Noise Flash Diversionary Devices (NFDD). Qty: 100. Total Cost. $4500.00. A device that creates a bright flash and loud sound to temporarily divert the attention of a subject. NFDD are used to distract and temporarily disorient suspects during high-risk incidents by overwhelming their senses of vision and hearing. The distraction allows officers to seize the moment in an effort to take control of a situation without further exposing officers and/or community members to injury or death. CPD uses the CTS 7290M and CTS 7290 NFDD.
b. Purpose:

To produce atmospheric over-pressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage during the resolution of a high-risk incident. c. Authorized Use:

Used exclusively by CPD SWAT officers in accordance with the SWAT procedural manual. Situations include but are not limited to hostage and barricaded person situations and high risk incidents where the use of a NFDD would enhance officer and community safety in order to distract a violent or otherwise dangerous person to aid in the apprehension of the suspect.
d. Expected Lifespan:

Estimated to be 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact:

No annual maintenance cost for NFDD. Due to operational readiness and capabilities in support of first responder missions the periodic purchase of NFDD may be required during the year. Any such purchase would be through existing CPD budget and/or grant/donation and in compliance with established City Purchasing rules.

Chemical Agents
f. Description, Quantity, Capabilities, and Purchase Cost:
 DefTech 1016- Pocket Tactical CS – Qty: 42. $19.40 per unit. The Pocket Tactical CS is small and lightweight. Emits CS for approximately 20-40 seconds. Used to provide a quick CS smoke screen as cover.  DefTech 1017- Pocket Tactical Saf-Smoke – Qty: 39. $17.95 per unit. The Pocket Tactical Saf-Smoke is small and lightweight. Emits smoke for approximately 20-40 seconds. Used to provide a quick smoke screen as cover.  DefTech 1026- Pocket Chaser CS – Qty: 30. $37.05 per unit. The TripleChaser CS consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing increased area coverage in a short period of time. This is used to provide a large CS Smoke screen in an outdoor setting. Emits CS for approximately 30-40 seconds.