9. Maintain at all times all licenses and permits as required by the state of California, and provide immediate notification to the Chief of Police if any state license or permit is suspended or revoked.
10. Any person who delivers cannabis to a customer must have in possession a copy of the city cannabis delivery license, which shall be made available upon request to law enforcement.
11. Delivery of cannabis shall be directly to the physical residence of the customer or secure exchange location at the Concord Police Department; deliveries to any other location are prohibited.
12. No licensee shall transport or cause to be transported cannabis in excess of the limits established by state law during the course of delivering cannabis.
13. A security plan must include procedures for verifying identification of customers both before entering the retail establishment and again before receiving cannabis or cannabis products.
14. The number, location, and hours of security guards shall be included in the application submittal.
15. A theft prevention plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police or designee.
16. On-site security guard(s) shall monitor activity within 150 feet of building entrance to ensure no cannabis consumption is occurring in the vicinity of the business, including parking areas.
17. A neighborhood responsibility plan that demonstrates how the business will reduce adverse impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, including neighborhood outreach, methods for future communication, and dispute resolution, shall be submitted and approved by the city.
18. Cannabis and cannabis products that are not used for display purposes or immediate sale shall be stored in a secured and locked room, safe, or vault, and in a manner reasonably designed to prevent diversion, theft, and loss.
19. The business owner shall take reasonable steps to discourage and correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance in parking areas, sidewalks, alleys and areas surrounding the premises during business hours if directly related to the patrons of the subject retailer. For purposes of this subsection, “reasonable steps” shall include calling the police in a timely manner and requesting those engaging in nuisance activities to cease those activities, unless personal safety would be threatened in making the request.
20. The public entrance shall be ADA accessible.
21. A storefront retail licensee shall not conduct sales exclusively by delivery.
22. The business owner shall remove litter on and in front of the premises and, if necessary, on public sidewalks within 100 feet of the facility two times, with a minimum of four-hour intervals, each operating day.
23. Vehicles used for distribution of cannabis or cannabis products shall not advertise any activity related to cannabis nor shall they advertise the name of the licensee.
24. A city cannabis distributor licensee shall register with and provide the Chief of Police each location within the city where cannabis or cannabis products are stored within the city for the purposes of distribution activities.
25. Outdoor cultivation shall be prohibited.
26. Cultivation of cannabis shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use of pesticides. Any fumigation or insecticidal fogging shall comply with the California Fire Code Chapter 26 (Fumigation and Insecticidal Fogging).
27. All cultivation operations shall submit an odor control and mitigation plan with detailed information about the proposed ventilation system, including technical specifications indicating that the system is capable of preventing the release of cannabis odors from the cultivation operation.
28. All cultivation operations shall submit a wastewater and water conservation plan.
29. No cannabis business shall be located within 250 feet of a sensitive land use, as defined in CMC Section 5.80.020, except as provided in CMC Section 5.80.060(f) (Sensitive Land Use Hardship). No sensitive land use shall be located in the buffer area that is within 600 feet of the Commercial Cannabis Overlay District (CMC Chapter 18.110). The applicant shall contact the Planning Division and Police Department if any sensitive use (as defined in CMC Section
5.80.020) is identified within 250 feet of the property (measured property line to property line).
30. No cannabis business may sell, store, distribute or allow the consumption of any alcoholic beverages or tobacco products on or at any premises where cannabis is sold.
31. No cannabis business may allow, permit, or provide for the consumption of cannabis products on site where the cannabis business is located, with or without compensation.
32. All uses shall be conducted completely within the building; no outdoor display or storage is allowed. No production, distribution, storage, display or wholesale of cannabis and cannabis products shall be visible from the exterior of the building where the commercial cannabis activity is being conducted, except as authorized by the Chief of Police.
33. Odors shall be contained within the licensed tenant space on which the commercial cannabis activity is located. Cannabis licensees shall prevent all odors generated from the cannabis use from escaping buildings to the extent that odor cannot be detected by a reasonable person of normal sensitivity outside the building, on adjacent properties or public rights-of-way, or within any other unit located within the same building as the cannabis licensee, if the use only occupies a portion of a building. If the City receives any odor complaints that rise to the level of a public nuisance, the cannabis business shall work with the city staff to correct odor concerns.
Unresolved or repeated odor complaints may be the basis for suspension or revocation of the City Cannabis License or denial of City Cannabis License renewal.
34. No cannabis business shall employ anyone who is younger than 21 years of age. No cannabis business shall sell or advertise to sell any cannabis, cannabis product or cannabis accessory to minors, except in circumstances where the minor is over 18 years of age and is permitted or
allowed by state law to purchase or possess medicinal cannabis, as set forth in California Business and Professions Code Section 26140, or any successor statute thereto.
35. All cannabis businesses shall maintain a commercial burglar alarm monitoring system, install a video surveillance system, and comply with the security plan approved by the Chief of Police. A cannabis business shall notify the Police Department immediately, and within 24 hours after discovering any of the following:
a. Diversion, theft, loss, or any criminal activity involving the cannabis or cannabis products or any agent or employee of the licensee.
b. The loss or unauthorized alteration of records related to cannabis or cannabis products, registered qualifying patients, primary caregivers or employees or agents. c. Significant discrepancies identified during inventory. d. Any other material breach of security.
36. Labels and packages of cannabis and cannabis products shall meet all state and federal labeling and packaging requirements.
37. City representatives may enter and inspect the property of every cannabis business to ensure compliance and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter, except that the inspection and copying of private medical records shall be made available to the Police Department only pursuant to a properly executed search warrant, subpoena, or court order. Such inspections shall occur during normal regular business hours unless the city has provided prior written notice to the cannabis business for an after-hours inspection. Upon request, the cannabis business shall timely provide the city official with records related to the business, including, but not limited to, utility bills from the commercial energy provider for the premises, inventory, financial records, and inventory tracking records. This section shall not limit any inspection authorized under any other provision of law or regulation.
38. Maintain at all times commercial general liability providing coverage at least as broad as ISO CGL Form 00 01 on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury with limits of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and comprehensive automobile liability (owned, nonowned, hired) providing coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CA 00 01 on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than $2,000,000. The commercial general liability policy shall provide contractual liability, shall include a severability of interest or equivalent wording, shall include an endorsement that specifies the insurance coverage afforded to the city shall be primary and noncontributory, and shall name the city, its officials and employees as additional insured. Failure to maintain insurance as required herein at all times shall be grounds for suspension of the city cannabis license immediately and, ultimately, revocation.
39. Maintain, for a minimum of seven years, a written accounting or ledger of all cash, receipts, credit card transactions, and reimbursements (including any in-kind contributions), as well as records of all operational expenditures and costs incurred by the licensee in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and standards typically applicable to business records, which shall be made available to the city during business hours for inspection upon reasonable notice by the Chief of Police.
40. Notify the Chief of Police within three calendar days of any notices of violations or other corrective action ordered by a state or other local licensing authority, and provide copies of the relevant documents.
41. The cannabis business shall obtain all building permits required pursuant to Title 15 for any electrical, plumbing, or other construction activities.
42. Temporary cannabis events shall be prohibited.
43. Any sign(s) requires a permit from the Building Division, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. Said sign(s) shall comply with the City of Concord Sign Ordinance and any applicable master sign program for the subject site/building. No off-site sign(s) is permitted. No commercial cannabis signage is permitted on the property and all signage shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.180 “Signs”.
44. All interior building improvements or alterations, including plumbing or electrical work shall be subject to a City Building Permit.
45. All garbage and recycling (waste) materials shall be stored within the building or an enclosure approved by the City. The trash enclosure shall be sized appropriately to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), subject to review and approval by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit for the trash enclosure. All indoor and outdoor waste receptacles shall be locked and secured in manner to prevent tampering, theft, and/or removal of any cannabis refuse or the waste receptacle. At no time shall any waste receptacles be located outside of the building, except during pick-up, without prior approval of a building permit for an exterior trash enclosure pursuant to CMC 18.150.150 (Solid waste and recycling storage). Disposal of cannabis, cannabis products, and cannabis waste shall occur in accordance with state law.
46. The cannabis business shall ensure that no cannabis, cannabis byproducts, or associated hazardous materials may be discharged into the sanitary sewer system (including, but not limited to, sinks, toilets, or storm drains).
47. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, state law, as well as all other applicable City of Concord Planning, Building, and Engineering codes and ordinances.
48. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Contra Costa Water District. A copy of this approval will be forwarded to the Contra Costa Water District to determine if a water connection upgrade is required. For additional information please contact Shawn Kelly of the Contra Costa Water District at (925) 688-8017.
49. Any change of use, any new building construction, any interior improvements or exterior improvements and modifications, including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing work require a permit from the Building Division. Please contact the Building Division at (925) 671-3107 for those specific requirements, permits and related fees (the Building Division can issue permits to either the real property owner or to licensed contractors).
50. The business shall maintain a valid business license.
51. Incorporate decorative bollards at the front of the building’s entrance and exit to the retail area of the storefront to protect pedestrians and the building from accidental or intentional collisions with vehicles to prevent theft and diversion of cannabis products. The quantity and location shall be based on spacing for ADA compliance (and other local laws). Bollards shall be included in the tenant improvement plans and reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police or designee and Planning Division prior to issuance of building permit.
52. By accepting the city cannabis license and executing the application form, each licensee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless to the fullest extent permitted by law the city, its officers, officials, agents and employees from and against any and all actual and alleged damages, claims, liabilities, costs (including attorney’s fees), suits or other expenses resulting from and arising out of or in connection with licensee’s operations, except such liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of the city, its officers, agents and employees.
GENERAL CONDITIONS – DESIGN AND SITE APPROVAL
53. The Conditions are the responsibility of the applicant and all contractors. Compliance shall occur as specified in the Conditions or at one of the following project milestones:
a) With the submittal of Grading, Improvement, Landscape, or Building Plans. b) Prior to issuance of Encroachment, Grading, or Building Permits, whichever comes first. c) Prior to construction.
d) On-going during renovations and construction.
e) Prior to occupancy approval.
If timing for compliance is not specified, it shall be determined by the Divisions listed after the Condition. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
54. Where a plan or further information is required, it is subject to review and approval by the applicable City Department/Division, as noted at the end of each Condition. The Division listed first shall be the primary contact for implementation of that Condition. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
55. The Conditions of Approval shall be listed on a plan sheet that is included in the construction plan set (Grading, Utility, Landscape and Building Plans). (PLNG, ENGR, BLDG)
56. The project shall comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and Concord Municipal Code (CMC) requirements. (PLNG, BLDG, ENGR)
57. Minor modifications that are found to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans such as colors, plant materials, or minor lot line adjustments, may be approved administratively.
Major modifications shall be approved by the applicable decision making body. (PLNG, ENGR)
58. The project site and area surrounding the site shall be maintained in a weed and litter free condition for the period prior to construction. (BLDG, PLNG)
59. All landscaping within the sight visibility triangles along the driveways must be kept below a maximum of three feet in height per 18.150.170 of the Development Code. (PLNG, TRANS)
60. Trash facilities shall be provided to ensure compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), subject to review and approval by Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery and City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. (MDRR, PLNG)
ARCHITECTURAL
61. Rooftop equipment (HVAC, meters, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers), shall not extend above the building parapet and shall be screened from view on all sides with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. Screening details shall be shown on the Building Plans and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits and installed prior to occupancy approval. (PLNG)
62. The back of the proposed trash enclosure shall be flush with the rear wall of the building. (PLNG)
63. Vents, gutters, downspouts, flashing, electrical conduits, etc., shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division. Dented or otherwise damaged construction elements should be replaced or repaired to a like-new condition. (PLNG)
64. All fences and walls on the subject property shall conform to the requirements in CMC Section
18.150.040. (PLNG)
65. Any additional exterior improvements to the building or property not included in the scope of work shall require Design and Site review and approval, as determined by the Planning Division. (PLNG)
TREE PRESERVATION & LANDSCAPING
66. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed per the approved landscape plan except as modified by these conditions. (PLNG)
67. All landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy approval. Contact the Planning Division at least two weeks prior to occupancy, to request a site inspection of all exterior improvements including buildings, driveways, parking lots, landscaping, irrigation, signs, lighting, walls, fences, and trash enclosures. (PLNG)
68. Any vegetation damaged or destroyed by construction activities shall be replaced with like or comparable plant materials, and if damage occurs off-site, the replacement plants shall be approved by the property owner and the Planning Division, prior to occupancy approval. (PLNG)
69. All existing trees within the project boundaries shall be preserved, unless otherwise noted to be removed by the approved landscape plan. (PLNG)
LIGHTING
70. All exterior building and parking lot lighting shall provide illumination for safety and shall be installed in a manner that is glare shielded and directed away from adjacent properties and rightof-ways. (PLNG)
71. Submit a Photometric plan for review and approval, showing the location of all light sources, streetlight spacing, intensity of luminance, and uniformity ratio, in accordance with the City’s specifications, with the Improvement, Utility, or Building Plans, whichever comes first. (ENGR,
TRANS, BLDG, PD)
72. All site lighting shall be installed prior to occupancy. (PLNG, TRANS)
SIGNAGE
73. All signage shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.180 “Signs”. (PLNG) CMC
PARKING
74. All parking spaces shall be striped; full-size spaces shall be 9 ft. by 19 ft; compact spaces shall be 8 ft. by 16 ft. Two feet of the required parking space depth may overhang into an abutting ADA-compliant sidewalk or landscape area. Wheel stops shall only be provided where required by law. (PLNG, ENGR) CMC
75. Parking shall comply with CMC Chapter 18.160 “Parking, Loading, and Access”, including motorcycle and bicycle parking spaces, drive aisle and parking space dimensions, turning radii, back-out dimensions, driveway clearances, landscape median dimensions, and other relevant information. (ENGR, PLNG) CMC
76. Applicant shall provide a plan for long-term bicycle parking for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to submittal of a Site Development Permit. The long-term bicycle parking spaces shall be made available to all employees of the site and comply with at least one of the following: 1) located within an enclosed bicycle locker; and/or 2) located within the secure and gated employee parking area behind the building. (PLNG)
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
77. Any trenching for underground utilities shall comply with the modified City Standard Detail S17 for pavement repair and possible slurry placement. (ENGR)
78. Construct all public facilities along the project frontage in accordance with the current American with Disability Act (ADA) requirements, including driveways and curb ramps. The sidewalk along the project frontage shall comply with the City of Concord Standard details S-10. The existing driveway shall be removed and replaced per City of Concord standard detail S-14. The driveway removal and replacement can be coordinated with the adjacent property owner per their project Condition of Approval 20. (ENGR)
NOISE
79. Noise producing site preparation and construction activities shall be limited to the days and hours as set forth below:
Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Construction on Saturdays may be allowed only upon prior approval by the Building, Engineering, and Planning Divisions. No changes to these construction hours shall be allowed without the prior written consent of the City. A contact person shall be available during all construction activities in the evening and on weekends to respond to complaints and take actions necessary to reduce noise. (BLDG, ENGR, PLNG)
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
80. Contact Engineering Services to arrange for a Pre-Construction Meeting prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, whichever comes first. (ENGR)
81. Implement a dust and construction noise control plan. Submit the plan to Engineering Services for review and approval prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. (ENGR)
82. Construction equipment shall not be serviced at the site at any time. During construction no deliveries shall be made to the site and no delivery vehicles (including gasoline tanker trucks) shall enter the site between 6:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. on weekdays, and between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. on weekends and federal holidays. Delivery vehicles shall have their engines turned off during unloading. (BLDG, ENGR, PLNG)
83. Employ the quietest construction equipment available, to muffle noise from construction equipment and keep all mufflers in good working order in accordance with State law. (BLDG,
ENGR, PLNG)
84. Implement the following measures during construction:
a) Gather all construction debris on a regular basis and place them in a dumpster or other container that is emptied or removed on a weekly basis. When appropriate, use tarps on the ground to collect fallen debris or splatters that could contribute to storm water pollution.
b) Remove all dirt, gravel, rubbish, refuse, and green waste from the street pavement, and storm drains adjoining the project site. During wet weather, avoid driving vehicles off paved areas.
c) Broom sweep the public street pavement adjoining the project site on a daily basis.
Caked-on mud or dirt shall be scraped from these areas before sweeping. d) Install filter materials (e.g., sandbags and filter fabric) at the storm drain inlet nearest the downstream side of the site in order to preclude any debris or dirt from flowing into the City storm drain system. Filter materials shall be maintained and/or replaced as necessary to ensure effectiveness and to prevent street flooding. Dispose of filter particles in an approved trash receptacle.
e) Create a contained and covered area on the site for the storage of bags, cement, paints, flammable, oils, fertilizers, pesticides, or any other materials used on the site that have the potential for being discharged to the storm drain system by being windblown or in the event of a material spill.
f) Never clean items such as machinery, tools, and brushes or rinse containers in a street, gutter, or storm drain.
g) Ensure that concrete, gunite, plaster, or similar supply trucks do not discharge wash water into street gutters or drains. (ENGR, BLDG)
85. No equipment shall be started or staging area be established on the streets or the site before or after the specified hours of construction. (ENGR, BLDG)
86. Ensure that no debris or construction scrap material is placed on any adjoining lot, open space area, or street, and that any such material stored on an adjoining site shall be completely removed and the site cleaned, prior to occupancy approval. (ENGR, BLDG)
87. At no time shall campers, trailers, motor homes, or any other vehicle be used as living or sleeping quarters on the construction site unless authorized for site security. (ENGR, BLDG)
88. There shall be no parking of construction equipment or construction worker’s vehicles on adjacent streets at any time; all vehicles shall be maintained on-site. (ENGR, BLDG)
89. Portable toilets used during construction shall be kept as far as possible from adjacent properties, public view and shall be emptied on a regular basis as necessary to prevent odor. (ENGR, BLDG)
CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW/PRE-PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
90. Submit electronic copy of Preliminary Title Report, prepared within three months prior to plan submittal. (ENGR)
91. Design improvements in accordance with the City Standard Plans S-34 and S-36 for sight distance, sidewalk, back up, fencing, geometrics at intersection and corner setback requirements, prior to the Acceptance of Improvements. Plans shall be subject to review and approval by Engineering Services. (ENGR)
92. Obtain a Site Development Permit from the City prior to performing any work within the site and public right-of-way or public easements. (ENGR) CMC
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
93. All grading shall require a Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, a Soils Report prepared by a registered Geotechnical Engineer and receipt of a Grading Permit approved by the City Engineer. The Grading Plans and Soils Report shall require review by the City’s Geotechnical consultant with all costs to be borne by the applicant. (ENGR)
94. Grading on adjacent properties shall require written approval from the affected property owners. (ENGR)
95. On-site finish grading work shall require drainage to be directed away from all building foundations at a minimum slope of 2 percent and a maximum slope of 20 percent toward approved drainage facilities or swales. Non-paved drainage swales shall have a minimum slope of 1 percent. (ENGR)
96. At all times seasonally appropriate erosion control measures shall be implemented per plans approved by the City Engineer for all grading work at all times. Wet season measures shall be in place October through April at a minimum and when rain is otherwise predicted. At the time of approval of the Improvement and/or Grading Plans, an approved Erosion Control Plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer. (ENGR)
97. Submit Grading, Erosion Control, Improvement, to Engineering Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading, Encroachment, and Building Permits. Where applicable, evidence of compliance with the State General Construction Permit shall be provided. (ENGR) CMC
98. Comply with the applicable provisions of the Grading Ordinance and the Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. (ENGR) CMC
UTILITIES
99. No above ground utility facilities/structures shall be located between the face of curb and back of sidewalk in the public right-of-way. (ENGR)
100. All new utilities shall be constructed underground prior occupancy approval. (ENGR) 101. Submit to Engineering Services a sewer fixture count and square footage of the existing buildings for possible fee credit purposes, prior to demolition or renovation. (ENGR) 102. Coordinate all facility adjustments, relocations, or additions to utility services with the appropriate utility companies. (ENGR)
103. If the project create or replace more than 2,500 square feet of impervious surface, then comply with the small land development project, Appendix C of the stormwater C.3 guidebook 7th edition.
104. Prevent site drainage from draining across sidewalks and driveways in a concentrated manner. (ENGR)
105. Sweep or vacuum the parking lot(s) a minimum of once a month and prevent the accumulation of litter and debris on the site. Corners and hard to reach areas shall be swept manually. If sidewalks and/or the parking lot are pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry into the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged into the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer, subject to the approval of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. (ENGR) 106. Ensure that the area surrounding the project such as the streets stay free and clear of construction debris such as silt, dirt, dust, and tracked mud coming in from or in any way related to project construction. Areas that are exposed for extended periods shall be watered regularly to reduce wind erosion. Paved areas and access roads shall be swept on a regular basis. All trucks shall be covered. (ENGR)
107. Clean all on-site stormdrain facilities a minimum of twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required if found necessary by the City Engineer/Director of Building Inspection. (ENGR, BLDG)
AGREEMENTS, FEES, BONDS
108. All fees noted below are the fees currently in effect as of July 1, 2022 per the Resolution of Fees and Charges. The fees and charges are reviewed annually as part of the budget public hearing process. Fee adjustments are based on a number of factors and vary depending on the type of fee:
Service-based fees are adjusted annually based on the San Francisco-San Jose-Oakland Area Consumer Price Index;
Improvement based fees (also called impact fees) are adjusted annually based on Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (San Francisco Bay Area); and the Parkland Fee is adjusted per Section 78-95 of the Concord Municipal Code.
The fees become effective as of the date set forth in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 78-6042, Fees and Charges for Various Municipal Services, as most recently amended and approved by the City Council. Persons interested in how a particular fee is calculated should contact the City Department administering the fee or the Finance Department. (ENGR) 109. Pay a Document Imaging fee to reimburse the City for implementation of the Document Imaging and File Retention programs, prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits. (PLNG) 110. All required faithful performance bonds and labor materials bonds in a penal amount equal to 100 percent of the approved estimates of construction costs of improvements shall be submitted to and approved by the City and other agencies having jurisdiction prior to issuance of the site development Permit. (ENGR)
OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS
111. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Submit complete sets of plans and specifications to the Fire District for review and approval at:
Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
4055 Port Chicago Highway, Suite 250
Pleasant Hill CA 94520
Plan review fees are assessed at that time. The City is not responsible for the collection of fees or enforcement of requirements imposed by the Fire District. (CCCFPD) 112. The applicant shall defend, (with counsel approved by City), indemnify and hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its/their respective agents, officers, officials, volunteers, and employees from and against any and all administrative and/or legal claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void, or annul approval of the project, including without limitation, any related application, permit, certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, compliance or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, and/or processing methods (“Challenge”), with the exception of a Challenge arising out of the City’s sole negligence or willful misconduct. The City shall have the right to prePage 51 of 294 approve any material decision involved in defending any such Challenge, including settlement, and may (but is not obligated to) participate in the defense of any Challenge. If applicant does not promptly defend any Challenge, City may (but is not obligated to) defend such Challenge as City, in its sole discretion, determines appropriate, all at applicant’s sole cost and expense. The applicant shall bear any and all losses, damages, injuries, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, staff time and in-house attorney's fees on a fully-loaded basis, attorney’s fees for outside legal counsel, expert witness fees, court costs, and other litigation expenses) arising out of or related to any Challenge (“Costs”), whether incurred by Developer, City, or awarded to any third party, and shall pay to the City upon demand any Costs incurred by the City. No modification of the project, any application, permit, certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, change in applicable laws and regulations, or change in processing methods shall alter the applicant’s indemnity obligation. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9, the applicant’s indemnification obligation with respect to any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of City concerning a subdivision (tentative, parcel, or final map application or approval) shall be limited to actions brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37, unless such time period is extended for any reason. The City shall promptly notify applicant of any Challenge, and shall cooperate fully in the defense. (CA) 113. The permit and approval shall expire in one year from the date on which they became effective unless construction permits are obtained and work has begun. (PLNG) 114. A request for a time extension from the expiration date of April 11, 2024 can be considered if an application with required fee is filed at least 10 days before the original expiration date, otherwise a new application is required. A public hearing will be required for all extension applications, except those involving only Design Review. Extensions are not automatically approved. Changes in conditions, City policies, surrounding neighborhood, and other factors permitted to be considered under the law, may require, or permit denial. (PLNG) 115. The City may impose additional conditions of approval, including additional site improvements, when the City Cannabis License extension(s) are granted. (PLNG) 116. The applicant shall duly execute and comply with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance 23-XX (An Ordinance Approving and Adopting a Development Agreement by and Between the City of Concord and Infinity Assets Concord LLC, Regarding the Development of a Cannabis Storefront Retail at 5121 Port Chicago Highway, Assessor’s Parcel Number 159-040-037 (PL22021 – AP, DR, DA).
Ord. No. 23-XX 1
ORDINANCE NO. 23-XX
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CONCORD AND
INFINITY ASSETS CONCORD, LLC, (DBA “COOKIES”) REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5121 PORT CHICAGO
HIGHWAY, ASSESSOR’S PARCELS NUMBER: 159-040-037 (PL22021 – AP,
ME, DA, DR)
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 18-3, which amended the Municipal Code and Development Code to establish a Commercial Cannabis Overlay District, associated development standards, and a licensing framework for medicinal-only cannabis manufacturing and distribution, and adult-use and medicinal testing laboratories; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, the City Council and Planning Commission conducted a Joint Study Session and directed staff to pursue revisions to the existing cannabis regulations to potentially allow additional commercial cannabis uses including adult-use and medicinal non-storefront retail; and consideration of allowing adult-use and medicinal storefront retail and microbusinesses; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2019, the City Council considered introduction of an Ordinance amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) to add adult-use City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing and distribution; to increase the maximum number of City Cannabis Licenses for manufacturing, distribution, and testing laboratories; to allow City Cannabis Licenses for medicinal and adult-use retail (storefront and non-storefront); and allow City Cannabis Licenses for microbusinesses. At the meeting, the City Council provided direction to staff regarding the allowable number of each cannabis license type, and directed staff to bring the Development Code amendments required for implementing corresponding changes to the Concord Development Code to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 20-4, Amending Concord Municipal Code Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis) and Development Code (Title 18) to Allow AdultUse City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers and Type 13 Distributors; Increase the Maximum Number of City Cannabis Licenses for Manufacturers, Type 13 Distributors, and Testing Attachment 2
Ord. No. 23-XX 2
Laboratories, and Allow City Cannabis Licenses for Retail (Storefront and Non-Storefront), Microbusinesses, and Type 11 Distributors; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020, the City Council approved the procedure, criteria, and scoring for a merit-based competitive process to review and select eligible applicants to apply for available City Cannabis Licenses for cannabis storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2020, the City of Concord issued a Request for Proposals for storefront retailers, non-storefront retailers, and microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2021, following interviews, public comment, and City Council deliberation, Infinity Assets Concord LLC (dba “Cookies” and herein referred to as “Applicant” or “Developer”) was invited to apply for one of two available cannabis microbusiness licenses; and WHEREAS, Applicant was invited to apply for one of two available licenses for a microbusinesses with a storefront retail component; and WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65864 et seq. authorizes a city and a developer having a legal or equitable interest in real property to enter into a binding, long-term development agreement establishing certain development rights in the property; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 18.460 Development Agreements authorizes the execution of development agreements and sets forth the required contents and form of those agreements; and
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2022, Applicant submitted an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, Design and Site Review, and Development Agreement applications to establish a cannabis microbusiness with storefront retail use at 5121 Port Chicago Highway, APN 159-040-037 (“Property”), (herein collectively referred to as “Project”); and WHEREAS, on July 29, 2022, the Project application was deemed complete by staff; and
Ord. No. 23-XX 3
WHEREAS, the City and Applicant have reached mutual agreement on the terms of the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after giving all public notices required by State Law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing March 1, 2023, on the proposed Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the Planning Commission considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process, including information received at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the written report from City staff dated March 1, 2023, materials, exhibits presented, and all other information that constitutes the record of proceedings on which the Planning Commission has based its decision that are maintained at the offices of the City of Concord Planning Division (collectively, “Planning Commission Information”); and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, the Planning Commission, after consideration of all pertinent plans, documents, and testimony, adopted Resolution No. 23-05 PC voted 4-0 (AYES: Laub, Corio, Barbour, Mizutani) recommending City Council approval of the Development Agreement with Infinity Assets Concord LLC for a microbusiness use including a storefront retail component; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after giving all public notices required by State Law and the Concord Municipal Code, held a duly noticed public hearing on April 11, 2023, on the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council also considered and adopted a Resolution approving an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, and Design and Site Review for a cannabis microbusiness with a storefront retail component 5121 Port Chicago Highway, APN: 159- 040-037, (PL22021 – AP, ME DR, DA) (“Resolution 23-XX”); and
Ord. No. 23-XX 4
WHEREAS, at such public hearing, the City Council considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the public review process, including information received at the public hearing, the oral report from City staff, the application materials, the written report from City staff dated April 11, 2023, and other exhibits presented, Resolution 23- XX, and the Planning Commission Information, which are maintained at the offices of the City of Concord City Clerk (collectively, “City Council Information”), and declared their intent to approve and adopt the Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed, considered, and evaluated the City Council Information, all other pertinent plans, documents, and testimony prior to acting upon Ordinance.
Section 3. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its recommendation are located in and may be obtained from the City of Concord Clerk’s Office, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord 94519.
Section 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively “CEQA”), the proposed Project is categorically exempt pursuant to following CEQA Guidelines: a) Section 15301 (“Existing Facilities”); b) Section 15302 (“Replacement or Reconstruction”); c) 15303 (“New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”); d) Section 15304 (“Minor Alterations to Land”); and/or e) Section 15305 (“Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations”). These categorical exemptions apply because the Project consists of tenant improvements to an existing building, with de minimis façade, site, and landscaping improvements.
Ord. No. 23-XX 5
Furthermore, pursuant to Section 15300.2(c), there are no exceptions to the categorical exemptions, because the Project: 1) is not located in a sensitive environment; 2) will not cause a cumulative impact due to successive projects of the same type in the same area; 3) will not have a significant effect on the environment due to a cumulative impact of other projects or unusual circumstances; 4) will not result in damage to scenic resources; 5) is not located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code; and, 6) will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, the proposed Project does not warrant further environmental review.
Section 5. Development Agreement.
a. The Development Agreement is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The cannabis microbusiness with a storefront retail, includes cultivation and distribution, which are consistent uses envisioned by the Business Park designation and the use is consistent with General Plan policies E-2.1.1, E-2.1.7, LU-6.1.2, LU-9.1.3, LU-10.1.5, and S-7.1.1.
The Project is consistent with the intent of the Business Park land use designation and applicable policies, particularly by fostering entrepreneurship and innovation by providing the second cannabis microbusiness with a storefront retail component in Concord and providing employment generating businesses that place an emphasis on hiring Concord residents. No specific plan applies to the Project. Establish land use priorities that foster entrepreneurship, growth, and innovative business development (Policy E-2.1.1). The proposed microbusiness with a storefront retail component would be the second of its kind in the City of Concord and the only microbusiness with cultivation and a storefront retail location in the City. Having an innovative and desirable use coupled with limited availability of these uses in the surrounding area could help attract other new innovative businesses to the City of Concord’s business park areas. Support the creation of job and contracting opportunities for Concord residents and businesses through the establishment of local hire preference, apprenticeships, internships, and other programs which support local hiring, training, and skill enhancement. (Policy E-2.1.7). The
Ord. No. 23-XX 6
Applicant has committed to hiring a large proportion of its employees from within Concord. The business plans to hire approximately 43 full-time employees primarily from the Concord community.
Provide sites for employment-generating businesses, technology-based businesses, and light industrial uses wishing to locate in Concord (Policy LU-6.1.2). The Project includes indoor cultivation and distribution at a scale consistent with light industrial uses. As explained above, the Project would generate approximately 43 full-time jobs primarily hired from the Concord community.
Require new commercial development to provide comprehensive landscaping, including hardscape and parking lot areas as well as pervious areas (Policy LU-9.1.3). The Applicant will be making minor but noticeable improvements to the building and site, including the addition of a pop-out feature to highlight the primary entrance to the building, updating the building’s façade by adding vertical corrugated metal panels and repainting and installing new landscaping, lighting, and trash enclosure. These improvements will enhance the look of the site and contribute to the overall attractiveness of the neighborhood. Require trees and other landscaping within parking lots (Policy LU-10.1.5). The Project will upgrade the existing parking lot with new landscaping including shade trees. Evaluate the effects of new development on law enforcement service and take public safety issues into account when reviewing land use proposals (Policy S-7.1.1). The potential effects of the proposed cannabis microbusiness with storefront retail have been evaluated to ensure appropriate measures will be in place to enhance public safety. The measures include: 1) a security plan reviewed and approved by the Chief of Police that requires, among other things, a commercial burglar alarm monitoring system and video surveillance system, procedures for verifying identification of customers entering and leaving the retail establishment, and on-site security guards; 2) a Neighborhood Compatibility Plan and the designation of a Community Relations Officer to respond to any complaints from the public, customers, and businesses with
Ord. No. 23-XX 7
respect to the cannabis operations or property; and 3) an Annual Review Report with the City that requires documentation on how complaints from the community were addressed. b. The Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices. Cannabis microbusinesses with a storefront retail component are allowed in the IBP zoning district with the approval of an Administrative Permit and via the competitive selection process. The proposed use will be occupying an existing building, which is in conformance with the regulations and standards for the zoning district with the exception of the Project exceeding its parking requirement, for which a Minor Exception is requested and the appropriate findings can be made. No known sensitive uses, as defined in CMC Chapter 5.80, are located within 250 feet of the subject property.
c. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the immediate area nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or to the general welfare of the residents of the city as a whole.
Approval of the Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of residents of the City. The Agreement, Conditional City Cannabis License, and Administrative Permit contain conditions of approval, including a safety and security plan that will ensure the use will not impact surrounding businesses and properties. The Agreement contains commitments from the Applicant, codified through adoption of the Agreement by the City Council to provide community benefits with the purpose of youth drug use prevention and education efforts, drug treatment and mental health programs, including programs providing supervised diversion from the criminal justice system to avoid recidivism, workforce development, small business assistance, providing amenities for public use and enjoyment, including streetscape and sidewalk improvements and public art installations, event programming and other activation of public space, and improving quality of life and providing economic opportunities.
d. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. The proposed business will be occupying an existing
Ord. No. 23-XX 8
building. The Applicant will be making changes to the exterior of the building, including a new entry feature, materials, paint, awnings, and signage, but no changes that would adversely affect the orderly development of property. The Applicant will also be making exterior improvements to the site, including new landscaping, fencing, and a trash enclosure. These improvements will help preserve property values for the area.
e. The Development Agreement is consistent with California Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5. Approval of the Development Agreement between the City and Infinity Assets Concord, LLC is in conformance with the provisions and intent of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 for the following reasons:
i. Assurances have been provided to the Developer due to vesting certain regulations. ii. The Developer has a legal or equitable interest in real property and the City will recover from the direct costs associated with the consideration of the Development Agreement. iii. The Development Agreement contains a provision requiring an annual review for compliance with the terms of the Agreement, including provisions allowing for the modification or termination of the Agreement if it is found the Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
iv. The Development Agreement specifies the duration, the permitted uses of the property, and the required land use approvals.
v. The Agreement is enforceable by any party thereto.
Section 6. The City Council does hereby pass and adopt this Ordinance No. 23-XX and approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Development Agreement in form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and (as more specifically set forth in the Development Agreement) further authorizes the City Manager or designee the authority to determine, review, and approve any “Minor Amendment” as set forth in the Development Agreement and subject to approval of the City Attorney.
Upon execution of the Development Agreement by all parties, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Development Agreement with the Contra Costa County Recorder’s Office.
Ord. No. 23-XX 9
Section 7. This Ordinance No. 23-XX shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Ordinance, a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney’s Office shall be published once at least five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance and once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Concord.
Laura M. Hoffmeister
Mayor
ATTEST:
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
(Seal)
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
Ord. No. 23-XX 10
Ordinance No. 23-XX was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord held on April 11, 2023, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Concord on May 2, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers -
NOES: Councilmembers -
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers -
ABSENT: Councilmembers -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California.
Joelle Fockler, MMC
City Clerk
Exhibit A: Development Agreement
Exhibit A to
Attachment 2
IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:59 PM
TITLE SHEET
2021
CONCORD MICROBUSINESS G001CANNABIS LICENSE
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY,CONCORD, CA 94520
Author
Checker
DESIGN & SITE REVIEW APPLICATION:
INFINITY/CONCORD
APN: 241-150-17-00
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY CONCORD, CA. 94520
prepared by Heleo Architecture and Design
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
Received 12/13/22
ATTACHMENT 3
A
1 F
23456
D15
D21D22
PORT
CHICAGO
HWY
SITE
COMMERCIAL
CIR
BATES AVE
SITE
PORT
CHICAGO
HWY
CALIFORNIA DELTA HWY
KINNE BLVD
TENTANT
IMPROVEMENT
PROPOSED CANNABIS
MICROBUSINESS
12,080 SQFT
ADJACENT SUITE
NOT IN SCOPE
CULTIVATION
7,307 SQFT
DISPENSARY
2,150 SQFT
OFFICE
817 SQFT
AREA NOT IN SCOPE
OPEN TO FLOOR BELOW
OFFICE
1,847 SQFT
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:33:03 PM As indicated PROJECT INFO 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS G002 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker
LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
BUILDING INFORMATION
SUITE AREAS:USE, ROOM AREA (SQUARE FEET)
DESIGN AND SITE REVIEW FOR CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS LICENSE FOR THE SITE LOCATED AT 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY., CONCORD, CA 94520. PROJECT PROPOSAL INCLUDES CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING WAREHOUSE BUILDING TO A 12,080 SF CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS, CONSISTING OF RETAIL, CULTIVATION AND DISTRIBUTION. INTERIOR GUT/REMODEL, EXTERIOR FACADE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS.INFINITY CONCORD USES THE SHELL OF AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TO HOUSE THE PROPOSED CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS. THE DESIGN APPROACH WAS TO GIVE THE EXISTING BUILDING A NEW FACADE USING ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS TO RE-SKIN THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, NEW SIGNAGE, AND NEW EXTERIOR LIGHTING GIVES THE STREET FRONTAGE NEW LIFE. THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN ADDS ANOTHER LAYER OF GREENERY TO THE EXISTING TREES WITH A PALETTE OF NATIVE CALIFORNIAN PLANTS.
USE UNIT COUNT SF PARKING FACTOR SPACES REQ.
A. CULTIVATIONB. DISPENSARYC. OFFICE
PROJECT TEAM
OWNER:LRC67, LLCFRANK CAROZZA, MANAGER
4060 PIKE LANE STE A
CONCORD, CA 94520
SHEET INDEX
DESIGN & SITE REVIEW:
INFINITY/CONCORD
PARKING CALCULATIONS
LAND USE REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT ADDRESS:
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520
A.P.N.:159-040-037EXISTING USE:COMMERCIAL / WAREHOUSEPROPOSED USE:RETAIL, MANUFACTURING, OFFICELEGAL DESCRIPTION:REC OF SURVEY 60 LSM 34 POR PCL ACONSTRUCTION TYPE:TYPE 1STORIES:2 APN: 159-040-037
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520
7,307 SF2,160 SF2,657 SF
1 PER 1,00
1 PER 2501 PER 250
89 11
PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: 14
LOT SIZE:1 ACREZONING:IBP (INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK)SETBACKS:FRONT: 20 FEETINTERIOR SIDE: 10 FEETCORNER SIDE: 20 FEETREAR: 10 FEETMAXIMUM STRUCTURAL HEIGHT:35 FEET
SITE AREA PLAN
PER SEC. 18.160.040 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
G001 TITLE SHEETG002 PROJECT INFOG003 ARBORIST REPORT
TENANT:INFINITY ASSETS CONCORD LLC.
5121 PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY
CONCORD CA 94520
CHEM STORAGE ARE/FERT 281 SFDRY ROOM 332 SFFLOWER 910 SFFLOWER 910 SFFLOWER 892 SFHALLWAY 1347 SFJANITOR 26 SFPACKING 130 SFPLANT WASTE COMPOSTING 134 SFQUARANTINE STORAGE 183 SFSECURED INVENTORY STORAGE 380 SFSECURED PICK UP/DROP OFF 596 SFSTORAGE 73 SFTRIM 158 SFVAULT 161 SFVEGETATION ROOM 663 SFWASTE DESTRUCTION 134 SFCULTIVATION 7309 SFDISPENSARY 1147 SFLOBBY 641 SFPRE ORDER 116 SFRECEPTION 139 SFDISPENSARY 2044 SFBREAK RM 100 SFHALLWAY 262 SFIT ROOM 285 SFLOCKER RM 163 SFOFFICE 195 SFOFFICE 377 SFOFFICE 154 SFOPEN OFFICE 858 SFRECORDS STORAGE 133 SFRESTROOM 59 SFRESTROOM 78 SFOFFICE 2664 SF TOTAL:TOTAL:TOTAL:
TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED ON SITE: 42
USE UNIT COUNT SF PARKING FACTOR SPACES REQ.
A.ASSUMED OFFICE AREAB. ASSUMED OTHER AREA
± 1,667 SF± 6,857 SF
1 PER 250
1 PER 1,000
77 ADJACENT TENANT SPACE (NOT IN SCOPE) AREA NOT SURVEYED:AREA OF WORK:PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: 28TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROPOSED ON SITE: 44 STALLS ( 1 VAN ADA, 1 STANDARD ADA, 43 STANDARD )
AREA PLANS
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2
ARCHITECT:HELEO1420 KETTNER BLVD. SUITES 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101619.393.6635CONTACT: CARLOS E. HERNANDEZ
GENERALSURVEYLIGHTING
ARCHITECTURE CONT.LANDSCAPE
1.1 BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY1.1 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICA001 CONTEXTUAL PLANA002 SITE PLAN & ACCESS PLANA101 EXISTING/DEMO FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 L001 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
ARCHITECTURE
A102 EXISITNG / DEMO FLOOR PLAN LVL 2A201 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1A202 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2A203 ROOF PLANA301 BUILDING SECTIONSA302 ELEVATION-EAST_WESTA701 EXTERIOR DETAILSA702 EXTERIOR DETAILSA703 METAL PANEL DETAILSA801 PHOTO SURVEY
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:33:05 PM
ARBORIST REPORT
2021
CONCORD MICROBUSINESS G003CANNABIS LICENSE
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY,CONCORD, CA 94520
Author
Checker
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
NO. REVISIONS BY CONCORD APP DATE MICHAEL E. MILANI N/A BMW & ARN KRA & JMJ DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: CALIFORNIA DATE 2042 SCALE: JUNE 2021 OF SHEETS 1 SHEET CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APN: 159-040-037 AS SHOWN DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECKED: JOB NO: DATE: BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY L.S. No. 5311 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/21 1 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY VICINITY MAP N Page 129 of 294 Schedule
Symbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Number
Lamps
Lumens
Per Lamp
Light Loss
Factor
Wattage
L1
3 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P3 40K
TFTM MVOLT SPA
PIRH1FC3V DBLXD
DSX1 LED P3 40K TFTM MVOLT, PARKING
AREA LIGHT MOUNTED 25' A.F.F TO
BOTTOM OF FIXTURE, VERIFY CONCRETE
BASE HEIGHT AND ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
1 12574 0.9 102
L2
3 Luminis Canada Inc. SY602-L2L15-R30-
XXX-BKT
Syrios Round 6, Up/Down LED Wall
mounted Fixture at 10'-6" a.f.f.
1 3190 0.9 31
CONCORD INFINITY
SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC
Designer
Rod E.
Date
05/25/2022
Scale
Noted
Drawing No.
1 Summary
1 of 1
0.8 2.4
1.5 0.8
1.2 2.6
1.3 0.8
0.8 0.9
0.9 1.0
1.0 1.1
1.2 2.6
2.4 1.2
1.1 1.1
1.1 1.0
1.0 1.0
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8
0.8 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.8
0.8 0.8
0.9 0.9
0.9 1.0
1.0 1.1
1.1 1.2
1.2 1.3
1.3 1.3
1.3 1.3
1.3 1.3
1.2 1.2
1.2 1.1
1.1 1.0
0.9 0.9
0.7 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.8
0.8 0.9
0.9 1.0
1.0 1.1
1.1 1.2
1.3 1.3
1.4 1.4
1.5 1.5
1.5 1.5
1.5 1.5
1.5 1.5
1.4 1.4
1.3 1.2
1.2 1.1
1.1 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.7
0.8 0.9
1.0 1.1
1.1 1.2
1.2 1.3
1.4 1.5
1.6 1.6
1.7 1.7
1.8 1.7
1.7 1.7
1.7 1.7
1.7 1.7
1.6 1.5
1.4 1.4
1.3 1.2
0.9 0.8
0.7 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.7 0.8
0.9 1.0
1.1 1.2
1.3 1.4
1.4 1.5
1.6 1.7
1.8 1.9
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0
2.0 1.9
1.9 1.8
1.7 1.6
1.5 1.4
1.0 0.9
0.8 0.7
0.6 0.7
0.8 0.9
1.0 1.1
1.3 1.4
1.5 1.6
1.7 1.7
1.8 1.9
2.1 2.2
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.2
2.2 2.0
1.9 1.8
1.7 1.6
1.6 1.5
1.4 1.3
1.1 1.0
0.9 0.8
0.7 0.8
0.9 1.0
1.1 1.3
1.4 1.6
1.7 1.8
1.9 2.0
2.1 2.2
2.4 2.5
2.6 2.7
2.7 2.6
2.6 2.6
2.6 2.7
2.7 2.6
2.5 2.3
2.2 2.1
1.9 1.9
1.8 1.7
1.6 1.4
1.2 1.1
1.0 0.9
0.8 0.8
0.9 1.1
1.2 1.4
1.6 1.8
1.9 2.1
2.2 2.2
2.4 2.5
2.7 2.9
3.0 3.0
3.0 3.0
2.9 2.9
3.0 3.0
3.0 3.0
2.8 2.7
2.5 2.3
2.2 2.1
2.0 1.9
1.8 1.6
1.4 1.2
1.0 0.9
0.8 0.9
1.0 1.1
1.3 1.5
1.7 1.9
2.1 2.3
2.4 2.5
2.7 2.8
3.0 3.2
3.4 3.4
3.4 3.4
3.3 3.3
3.3 3.4
3.4 3.3
3.2 3.0
2.8 2.6
2.5 2.4
2.3 2.1
1.9 1.7
1.5 1.3
1.1 1.0
0.9 0.9
1.0 1.2
1.4 1.6
1.8 2.0
2.2 2.4
2.6 2.7
2.8 3.0
3.2 3.4
3.5 3.6
3.6 3.6
3.5 3.5
3.6 3.6
3.6 3.5
3.3 3.2
3.0 2.8
2.6 2.5
2.4 2.2
2.0 1.8
1.5 1.3
1.2 1.0
0.9 0.9
1.1 1.2
1.4 1.6
1.8 2.0
2.2 2.4
2.6 2.7
2.9 3.1
3.3 3.4
3.5 3.7
3.7 3.7
3.6 3.6
3.7 3.7
3.6 3.5
3.4 3.2
3.0 2.8
2.7 2.6
2.4 2.2
2.0 1.8
1.6 1.4
1.2 1.1
0.9 0.9
1.0 1.2
1.4 1.5
1.7 1.9
2.2 2.4
2.5 2.7
2.9 3.0
3.1 3.3
3.4 3.5
3.6 3.6
3.6 3.6
3.6 3.6
3.5 3.4
3.3 3.1
3.0 2.8
2.6 2.5
2.3 2.1
1.9 1.7
1.5 1.4
1.2 1.0
0.9 1.1
1.3 1.5
1.6 1.9
2.1 2.3
2.5 2.7
2.9 3.0
3.1 3.3
3.4 3.5
3.6 3.6
3.6 3.5
3.4 3.4
3.3 3.1
3.0 3.0
2.9 2.7
2.5 2.3
2.1 1.8
1.6 1.4
1.3 1.1
0.8 1.1
1.2 1.4
1.6 1.8
2.0 2.3
2.6 2.8
2.9 3.1
3.1 3.2
3.4 3.5
3.6 3.7
3.6 3.6
3.4 3.3
3.2 3.1
3.1 3.0
2.9 2.8
2.6 2.3
2.0 1.8
1.6 1.4
1.2 1.1
0.8 1.0
1.2 1.3
1.5 1.8
2.1 2.4
2.6 2.8
3.0 3.1
3.1 3.2
3.3 3.5
3.6 3.7
3.6 3.6
3.4 3.3
3.1 3.1
3.1 3.1
3.0 2.8
2.6 2.3
2.0 1.7
1.5 1.3
1.1 1.0
0.7 1.0
1.1 1.3
1.5 1.8
2.1 2.5
2.7 2.9
3.1 3.1
3.2 3.2
3.4 3.5
3.6 3.6
3.6 3.5
3.4 3.3
3.1 3.1
3.1 3.1
3.0 2.9
2.7 2.5
2.1 1.8
1.5 1.3
1.1 1.0
0.7 1.0
1.1 1.3
1.5 1.8
2.1 2.5
2.8 3.1
3.3 3.3
3.3 3.3
3.4 3.6
3.7 3.8
3.7 3.5
3.3 3.2
3.1 3.2
3.2 3.3
3.1 2.8
2.5 2.1
1.8 1.5
1.3 1.1
1.0 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
3.9 L2 @ 10.5'
L2 @ 10.5'
L2 @ 10.5'
L1 @ 25'
L1 @ 25'
L1 @ 25'
Plan View
Scale - 3/32" = 1ft
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
SITE PARKING LOT 2.0 fc 3.9 fc 0.5 fc 7.8:1 4.0:1
METER
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
PROPERTY LINE, 174.25'
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
P
R
O
P
E
RTY
L
I
N
E
,
1 1
5 .
8 9
'
P
O
R
T
C
H
I
C
A
G
O
H
W
Y
TENTANT
IMPROVEMENT
PROPOSED CANNABIS
MICROBUSINESS
12,080 SQFT
APN: 159-040-037
ZONING: IBP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
APN: 159-040-038
ZONING: IBP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
APN: 159-040-024
ZONING: IBP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
APN: 159-040-096
ZONING: OBP
ADJACENT PROPERTY
APN: 159-040-097
ZONING: OBP
1 4' 1
4' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE
UTILITY & ACCESS EASEMENTWIDE NON-EXCLUSIVEUTILITY & ACCESS EASEMENT 20'
WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE
UTILITY & ACCESS EASEMENT
CENTRAL SANITARY DISTRICT 10' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT
10' - 0"
ACCESS ROADWAY
27' - 10 3/4"
2 NEW ( NO PARKING
FIRE SIGNS )
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) FIRE LANE NO
PARKING SIGN
CLR.
26'
- 0 3/4"
(E) MANUALLY OPERATED GATE
EQUIPPED WITH A NONCASEHARDENED LOCK (E) ALL WEATHER PAVED DRIVING SURFACE , <2% SLOPE 45 FOOT RADIUS 45 FOOT RADIUS
(E) ALL WEATHER
PAVED DRIVING
SURFACE , <2% SLOPE
5' -
0 "
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:35 PM 1/16" = 1'-0" CONTEXTUAL PLAN 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A001 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 CONTEXTUAL PLAN
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
METER
A302 2
1 A302
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)
(28)(27)(26)(25)(24)(23)(22)(21)(20)(19)(18)(17)(16)
(29)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)
1.14 PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
PROPERTY LINE, 174.25'
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
P
R
O
P
E
RTY
L
I
N
E
,
1 1
5 .
8 9
'
1.12 32.1
32.1 8.5
23.19 P
O
R
T
C
H
I
C
A
G
O
H
W
Y
TENTANT
IMPROVEMENT
PROPOSED CANNABIS
MICROBUSINESS
12,080 SQFT
(E) CONCRETE PAD, NO CHANGE(E) PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
(E) SWITCH GEAR/
DISTRIBUTION PANEL
(E) CONCRETE PAD,
NO CHANGE
(E) PLANTING,
NO CHANGE
(E) CONCRETE WALK,
NOT IN SCOPE
(E) PLANTING,
ENLARGED
(E) PLANTING,
ENLARGED
DRIVE AISLE
27' - 8 3/4" CLR.
(E) MANUAL GATE, NO CHANGE (E) DRIVE APRON,
NO CHNAGE
(N) SITE FENCE
SID
E
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
1 0' IN
T
E
RIO
R
REAR SETBACK
10'
1.10 1.7
DOUBLE LOADED DRIVE AISLE
24' - 0"
A701
5 L1
L1L1
L1
L2L2L2
(N) TRASH
ENCLOSURE
BOLLARD
PARKING LOT TO
BE RESTRIPED TO
CONFORM WITH
CITY GUIDELINES
PARKING LOT TO
BE RESTRIPED TO
CONFORM WITH
CITY GUIDELINES
BOLLARD
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
1 1' A702
4 19' TYP.
9' T
Y
P
.
19' TYP.
9' T
Y
P
.
19' TYP.
19' TYP.
21.1 1.1
(N) GREEN SCREEN
(30)(39)
5' -
0 "
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PER CBC 11B-206A CONTINUOUS UNOBSTRUCTED PATH CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS AND SPACES OF AN ACCESSIBLE SITE, BUILDING OR FACILITY THAT CAN BE NEGOTIATED BY A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY USING A WHEELCHAIR, AND THAT IS ALSO SAFE FOR AND USABLE BY PERSONS WITH OTHER DISABILITIES. EXTERIOR ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MAY INCLUDE PARKING ACCESS AISLES, CURB RAMPS, CROSSWALKS AT VEHICULAR WAYS, WALKS, RAMPS AND LIFTS.
NO PARKING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE PER CBC 11B-502
SITE LIGHT
P.A. PLANTER AREA
ACCESSILBLE CURB RAMP W/ 12"WIDE GROOVED BORDER AND DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER CBC 11B-406 ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE-PROVIDE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ENTRANCE SIGN (6"X6" DECAL MOUNTED BETWEEN 3'-0" TO 3'-6" A.F.F. CENTERED ON SINGLE DOORS, CENTERED ON RIGHT PANEL OF DOUBLE DOORS) PER CBC 11B-404 N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:38 PM As indicated SITE PLAN & ACCESS PLAN 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A002 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 SITE PLAN-PLANNING
1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES, INCONSISTENCIES ERRORS, OMISSIONS, AMBIGUITIES AND/OR CONFLICTS TO THE ARCHITECT.
2. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FABRICATE AND INSTALL THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ACCEPTED GOOD PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES AND TO LET THE ARCHITECT KNOW AT THE TIME OF BIDDING IF DRAWINGS AND DETAILS ARE NOT PRACTICAL OR STRUCTURALLY SOUND IN THEIR INTENT AND PURPOSE.
3. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED PROJECT. THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUCH MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, BRACING, SHORING, SHORING FOR LOADS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, ETC. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY THE THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT INCLUDE OBSERVATION OF THE ABOVE ITEMS.
4. WORK WILL BE COORDINATED WITH ALL TRADES IN ORDER TO AVOID INTERFERENCE, AND AVOID OMISSIONS.5. ARRANGE DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES. COORDINATE DELIVERY TIME TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH OTHER WORKS AND CONDITIONS AT JOB SITE.
DELIVER PRODUCTS IN MANUFACTURER’S ORIGINAL SEALED CONTAINERS OR PACKAGING, WITH IDENTIFYING LABELS INTACT AND LEGIBLE. PROVIDE NECESSARY PROTECTION AND HANDLING METHODS TO PREVENT SOILING AND DAMAGE TO MATERIALS OR PRODUCTS DURING TRANSPORTATION. IMMEDIATELY UPON DELIVERY, INSPECT SHIPMENTS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ACCEPTED SUBMITTALS.
6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ENGAGE AND BEAR THE COST OF PROPERLY QUALIFIED PERSONS TO DETERMINE FIELD LAYOUT OF BUILDING ELEMENTS.7. EACH SUBCONTRACTOR WILL AMEND AND MAKE GOOD AT HIS OWN COST, ANY DEFECTS OR OTHER FAULTS IN HIS WORKMANSHIP AND/OR HIS SUPPLIED MATERIALS.
8. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COMPLEMENTARY, AND WHAT IS REQUIRED BY ONE SHALL BE BINDING AS IF REQUIRED BY ALL. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
9. ADD SUFFICIENT BLOCKING IN STUD WALLS TO SUPPORT ALL ITEMS OR EQUIPMENT SHOWN OR SPECIFIED TO BE ATTACHED TO THE WALLS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT (ANGLES, CHANNELS, ETC.) WITHIN WALLS WHERE THE WEIGHT OF ATTACHED ITEMS OR EQUIPMENT IS TOO GREAT TO BE SUPPORTED BY METAL STUDS. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR OWNER FURNISHED OR INSTALLED ITEMS.
10. ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO WORK MUST BE AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. NO ALTERATIONS WILL BE MADE ON THIS PROJECT EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN ORDER BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.
11. ALL MATERIALS DELIVERED TO THE JOB SITE IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE OR THEFT. SUCH PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE AND THEFT SHALL ALSO APPLY TO IN-PLACE MATERIALS. ALL DELIVERED AND IN-PLACE MATERIALS REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR THE ENTIRE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. DAMAGED OR STOLEN MATERIALS SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE BUILDING OWNER OR ARCHITECT.
12. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. ALL OTHER REGULATING CODES AND AGENCIES WHICH HAVE AUTHORITY OVER ANY PORTION OF THE WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY, TITLE.24 AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, AND THOSE CODES AND STANDARDS LISTED IN THESE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
13. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE PREMISES FREE FROM THE DAILY ACCUMULATION OF WASTE MATERIALS OR RUBBISH CAUSED BY ALL ON-SITE OPERATIONS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL GLASS, WALLS, AND DOOR SURFACES, VACUUM ALL FLOOR SURFACES, AND LEAVE THE SITE "BROOM CLEAN." THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING THE EXTERIOR OF THE EXISTING WINDOWS.
14. WHERE WORK OR EQUIPMENT IS INDICATED "N.I.C.," SUCH WORK AND/OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COOPERATE TO EFFECT SUCH INSTALLATION.
15. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL THAT IS IN OPERATING CONDITION WHEN REMOVED, SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS SUCH AND RETURNED AS PER BUILDING OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS.16. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS WILL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND WILL VERIFY EXISTING SITE AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WILL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, SUPERVISION, AND MATERIALS OF EVERY TYPE WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY FOR A SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER ACCORDING TO THE TRUE INTENT AND MEANING OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
17. THE REGISTERED AND RESPONSIBLE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL REVIEW THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS AND SUBMIT THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, WITH ANNOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. (SDMC §129.0205)
18. KNOX KEY BOX IS REQUIRED FOR ALL FIRE SPRINKLERED AND NEW BUILDINGS.
KEYNOTES
1.1 (E) FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN1.7 (N) SECURED TRASH AREA1.10 PROPOSED ADA SIGN1.12 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING1.14 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
SITE PLAN LEGENDSITE PLAN NOTES
USE UNIT COUNT SF PARKING FACTOR SPACES REQ.
A. CULTIVATIONB. DISPENSARYC. OFFICE
7,307 SF2,160 SF2,657 SF
1 PER 1,00
1 PER 2501 PER 250
89 11
PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: 14
PER SEC. 18.160.040 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED ON SITE: 42USE UNIT COUNT SF PARKING FACTOR SPACES REQ.
A.ASSUMED OFFICE AREAB. ASSUMED OTHER AREA
± 1,667 SF± 6,857 SF
1 PER 250
1 PER 1,000
77 ADJACENT TENANT SPACE (NOT IN SCOPE) AREA NOT SURVEYED:AREA OF WORK:PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: 28TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROPOSED ON SITE: 44 STALLS ( 1 VAN ADA, 1 STANDARD ADA, 43 STANDARD )
PARKING CALCULATIONSSITE LIGHT SCHEDULE
TYP. MARK COUNT FIN. MANUFACTURE CATALOG # COMMENTSL1 3 BLK LITHONIA LIGHTING DSXO-LED-P4-40K PARKING LIGHT, 25' A.F.F.L2 3 BLK LUMINIS CANADA INC. SY602-L2L15-R30 UP DOWN LIGHT, 10'-6" A.F.F.
8.5 SKYLIGHT21.1 FIRE LANE NO PARKING SIGN23.19 PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS32.1 DETECTABLE WARNING
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
UP
A
1 2.5
2.5 ADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPEADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPE
5.6 5.6
5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
5.6 5.6 5.65.6 5.6
F
2345
B C D E
2.8 2.8
2.8 22.9
22.9 22.9 22.9
22.9 22.9
2.112.11
2.11 6
5.9 2.11 2.11
2.11 2.11
OFFICE
OPEN OFFICE/ASSEMBLY
SALES
OFFICE
WAREHOUSE UNIT 5121
KITCHEN
OFFICEOFFICE
5.14 EXISTING WALL TO REMAINNEW WALLWALL TO DE DEMOLISHED
ABOVE, BELOW, OR HIDDEN
1t
D1
WINDOW CALLOUTDOOR CALLOUT
1t FLOOR FINISH CALLOUT
1i WALL CALLOUT
AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
T SAFETY GLAZING
DEMOLISHED
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:40 PM As indicated EXISTING/DEMO FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A101 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 EXISITING / DEMO FLOOR PLAN LVL 1-PLANNING Copy 1
KEYNOTESLEGEND
1. DEMOLITION IS NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO WHAT IS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. THE INTENT IS TO INDICATE THE GENERAL SCOPE OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS.
2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD SURVEY SITE OF PROPOSED WORK PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THEIR BID TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT & NATURE OF THE DEMOLITION WORK.
3. OBTAIN DEMOLITION PERMITS & INCLUDE ALL COSTS OF SAME IN CONTRACT PRICE, IF REQUIRED.4. FURNISH ALL LABOR & MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE DEMOLITION & REMOVAL OF ALL ITEMS AS INDICATED.
5. IF ANY QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY MATERIAL, CLARIFY THE POINT IN QUESTION WITH THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING.
6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCONNECT ALL POWER IN AREAS OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY BUILDING ENGINEER BEFORE THIS HAPPENS.
7. WHERE MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL SHEETS INDICATE FOR A UTILITY SYSTEM TO BE REROUTED. DISCONNECTED, OR TIED INTO DO NOT ALTER (E) SYSTEM UNTIL THE NEW SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED, APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT, AND TESTED.
8. IN PARTITIONS TO BE REMOVED, REMOVE & CAP ALL OUTLETS, SWITCHES, WIRES. THERMOSTATS, ETC. TO THEIR SOURCE AS REQUIRED.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PATCHING AND/OR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIM OR HIS SUBCONTRACTORS TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN ELEVATOR LOBBY, PUBLIC CORRIDORS. RESTROOMS OR TENANT SPACES. REFINISH TO MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT FINISH, OR AS NOTED HEREIN.
10. REMOVE TO SOURCE ALL PIPES. VENTS, APPLIANCES OR DRAINS NOT BEING RE-USED.11. REMOVAL OF ANY EQUIPMENT, CABLING SWITCHES, & CONDUIT PERTAINING TO DATA/COMMUNICATIONS & TELEPHONE SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH TELEPHONE COMPANIES, SERVICE OWNER OR TENANT DATA/COMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATIVE AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT NEW CONSTRUCTION DELAYS.
12. REMOVE ALL (E) IRREGULAR MATERIALS WHICH CAUSE RISES OR DEPRESSIONS IN FLOORING SURFACE, SUCH AS FASTENERS, OUTLET CORES, COVER PLATES, RESILIENT FLOOR COVERINGS, CARPET, CARPET PAD, FLASH PATCH, CONCRETE FILL, PLYWOOD, ETC.
13. AT COMPLETION OF DEMOLITION WORK, THE CONSTRUCTION AREA(S) SHALL BE LEFT IN BROOM CLEAN CONDITION. ALL DEBRIS & MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PER BUILDING MANAGEMENT.
14. (E) CONSTRUCTION & CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DOCUMENTS REPRESENT ALL CONDITIONS KNOWN TO ARCHITECT. WHEN OTHER CONDITIONS & CONSTRUCTION ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT.
15. REMOVE ALL EXISTING FINISHES TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PARTITIONS, CARPETING, WALLCOVERING, VINYL TILE & MILLWORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. THE ARCHITECT HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON THE JOBSITE. IF ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ISOLATE THE AFFECTED AREA AND CONTACT THE OWNER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING.
17. ALL DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC CH. 33
1. RESTROOM WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES TO BE DEMOLISHED2. (E) BREAK ROOM WALLS, SINK, (E) CABINETRY AND FLOOR FINISH TO BE DEMOLISHED3. (E) WASH STATION SINKS TO BE REMOVED4. (E) RESTROOM PLUMBING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVEDDEMO NOTESDEMOLITION SCOPE OF WORK
2.5 (E) WALL TO REMAIN2.8 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL2.11 REMOVE (E) DOOR, FRAME & HARDWARE5.6 EXISTING STEEL COLUMN5.9 (E) STAIRCASE TO REMAIN5.14 (E) STAIRCASE TO BE DEMOLISHED22.9 REMOVE (E) PLUMBING FIXTURE
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
A
1 ADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPEADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPE F
2345
B C D E
6 1147 SF
DISPENSARY
641 SF
LOBBY
139 SF
RECEPTION
116 SF
PRE ORDER
CLR.
5'
1 9' -
6 "
46' - 8"
1 9' -
6 "
1 9' -
1 3
/
8 "
C
L
R
.
8' -
9 7
/
8"
C
L
R
.
1 0' 17' - 0" 39' CLR. 5' 10' - 5 1/8" 6' - 5 1/8" 19' - 6" 13' - 0" 11' - 6"
1 4' -
1"
15' - 9"
7' - 3"
CLR.
8' - 2 1/8"
C
L
R
.
5' -
2 5
/
8"
CLR.
5'
C
L
R
.
4' H20 H20 H20
H20 H20
UP
C
L
R
.
1' EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW WALL WALL TO DE DEMOLISHED ABOVE, BELOW, OR HIDDEN 1t D1 WINDOW CALLOUT DOOR CALLOUT 1t FLOOR FINISH CALLOUT 1i WALL CALLOUT AREA NOT IN CONTRACT T SAFETY GLAZING DEMOLISHED N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:43 PM As indicated PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A201 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LVL 1 PLANNING
KEYNOTESLEGEND
1. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OF CONFLICTS IN THE LOCATION(S) OF CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS: ALSO ANY UNFORSEEN JOB CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT AFFECT PROJECT COSTS. ADDITIONAL WORK AND/OR COSTS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. ALL PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED FROM FINISHED FACE TO FINISHED FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT TO REMAIN WHICH IS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH WITH FINISH SCHEDULE.
4. ALL WORK SHALL BE ERECTED & INSTALLED PLUMB, LEVEL, SQUARE, TRUE, & IN PROPER ALIGNMENT.5. ALL GLASS SHALL BE CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GLAZING TONG MARKS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE. CLEAN & POLISH ALL GLASS PRIOR TO PROJECT DELIVERY.
6. ALL EXPOSED GYPSUM BOARD EDGES TO HAVE METAL EDGE TRIM AND MUDDED FLUSH WITH WALL.7. ALL GYPSUM BOARD SHALL BE TAPED & SANDED SMOOTH TO A LEVEL 4 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DUE TO SPECIALTY FINISH OR APPLIED WALLCOVERING. FINISH WITH NO VISIBLE JOINTS. ALIGN, PATCH & REPAIR SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT OF ADJOINING SURFACES WHERE CONDITION OCCURS.
8. ALL EXISTING & NEW FLOOR SLAB PENETRATIONS FOR PIPING SHALL BE FULLY PACKED & SEALED WITH FIRE-RATED MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING & FIRE CODES.
9. REFER TO MILLWORK SHOP DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS OF COORDINATION BETWEEN DRYWALL/MILLWORK CONDITIONS.10. ALL MILLWORK IS TO BE ANCHORED TO THE PARTITION. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR ALL MILLWORK NOT SUPPORTED BY SLABS OR ABOVE 4 -0" IN HEIGHT.
11. REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISHES. WHERE APPLICABLE LEVEL ALL EXISTING FLOORS AS REQUIRED TO RECEIVE NEW FLOOR FINISHES. INSTALL PER FINISH SCHEDULE.
12. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN THE FIELD CEILING HEIGHT & CEILING FIXTURE LOCATIONS AS TO NOT TO INTERSECT NEW PARTITIONS WITH EXISTING CEILING FIXTURES.
13. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE & REMOVE ALL EXISTING ELECTRICAL COMPONENT, OUTLET, SWITCH & J-BOX.
14. PROVIDE BLOCKING PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATION FOR WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED EQUIPMENT OR FURNISHINGS.
15. EXISTING WALLS WERE CONSTRUCTED WITH OTHER PERMITS AND/OR CONTRACTS. FIELD VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AND WIDTH PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF DOOR FRAMES OR COMPONENTS WHICH REQUIRE THE WIDTH OF THE WALL TO BE SET.
16. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH ONE HOUR FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH U.L. LISTED FIRE STOP SYSTEM.
17. ALL PENETRATIONS @ WALLS THAT HAVE SOUND INSULATION SHALL BE SEALED NON-HARDENING ACOUSTICAL SEALANT.18. WATER SUPPLY AND DRAIN PIPES UNDER LAVATORIES AND SINKS SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE CONFIGURES TO PROTECT AGAINST CONTACT. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES UNDER LAVATORIES AND SINKS.
19. CARD READERS SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED ON EGRESS SIDE20. DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORTS.
21. PLANS FOR ALL FIXED FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT SUCH AS STANDPIPES, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THIS EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED.
1. NEW CANNABIS RETAIL ND CULTIVATION + SUPPORT SPACES2. REMODEL OF RESTROOMS3. NEW BREAK ROOM4. NEW SECURITY / RECEPTION DESK AREAFLOOR PLAN NOTESFLOOR PLAN SCOPE OF WORK
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
A
1 ADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPEADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPE F
2345
B C D E
6 (N) STAIR @ (E) LOCATION
22-2 (N) STAIRCASE
AREA NOT IN SCOPE
OPEN TO FLOOR BELOW
DN
EXISTING WALL TO REMAINNEW WALLWALL TO DE DEMOLISHEDABOVE, BELOW, OR HIDDEN 1t
D1
WINDOW CALLOUTDOOR CALLOUT
1t FLOOR FINISH CALLOUT
1i WALL CALLOUT
AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
T SAFETY GLAZING
DEMOLISHED
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:45 PM As indicated PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A202 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN LVL 2 PLANNING
KEYNOTESLEGEND
1. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OF CONFLICTS IN THE LOCATION(S) OF CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS: ALSO ANY UNFORSEEN JOB CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT AFFECT PROJECT COSTS. ADDITIONAL WORK AND/OR COSTS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. ALL PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED FROM FINISHED FACE TO FINISHED FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT TO REMAIN WHICH IS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH WITH FINISH SCHEDULE.
4. ALL WORK SHALL BE ERECTED & INSTALLED PLUMB, LEVEL, SQUARE, TRUE, & IN PROPER ALIGNMENT.5. ALL GLASS SHALL BE CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GLAZING TONG MARKS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE. CLEAN & POLISH ALL GLASS PRIOR TO PROJECT DELIVERY.
6. ALL EXPOSED GYPSUM BOARD EDGES TO HAVE METAL EDGE TRIM AND MUDDED FLUSH WITH WALL.7. ALL GYPSUM BOARD SHALL BE TAPED & SANDED SMOOTH TO A LEVEL 4 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DUE TO SPECIALTY FINISH OR APPLIED WALLCOVERING. FINISH WITH NO VISIBLE JOINTS. ALIGN, PATCH & REPAIR SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT OF ADJOINING SURFACES WHERE CONDITION OCCURS.
8. ALL EXISTING & NEW FLOOR SLAB PENETRATIONS FOR PIPING SHALL BE FULLY PACKED & SEALED WITH FIRE-RATED MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING & FIRE CODES.
9. REFER TO MILLWORK SHOP DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS OF COORDINATION BETWEEN DRYWALL/MILLWORK CONDITIONS.10. ALL MILLWORK IS TO BE ANCHORED TO THE PARTITION. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR ALL MILLWORK NOT SUPPORTED BY SLABS OR ABOVE 4 -0" IN HEIGHT.
11. REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISHES. WHERE APPLICABLE LEVEL ALL EXISTING FLOORS AS REQUIRED TO RECEIVE NEW FLOOR FINISHES. INSTALL PER FINISH SCHEDULE.
12. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN THE FIELD CEILING HEIGHT & CEILING FIXTURE LOCATIONS AS TO NOT TO INTERSECT NEW PARTITIONS WITH EXISTING CEILING FIXTURES.
13. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE & REMOVE ALL EXISTING ELECTRICAL COMPONENT, OUTLET, SWITCH & J-BOX.
14. PROVIDE BLOCKING PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATION FOR WALL OR CEILING MOUNTED EQUIPMENT OR FURNISHINGS. 15. EXISTING WALLS WERE CONSTRUCTED WITH OTHER PERMITS AND/OR CONTRACTS. FIELD VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AND WIDTH PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF DOOR FRAMES OR COMPONENTS WHICH REQUIRE THE WIDTH OF THE WALL TO BE SET.
16. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH ONE HOUR FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH U.L. LISTED FIRE STOP SYSTEM.
17. ALL PENETRATIONS @ WALLS THAT HAVE SOUND INSULATION SHALL BE SEALED NON-HARDENING ACOUSTICAL SEALANT.18. WATER SUPPLY AND DRAIN PIPES UNDER LAVATORIES AND SINKS SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE CONFIGURES TO PROTECT AGAINST CONTACT. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES UNDER LAVATORIES AND SINKS.
19. CARD READERS SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED ON EGRESS SIDE20. DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORTS.
21. PLANS FOR ALL FIXED FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT SUCH AS STANDPIPES, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THIS EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED.
FLOOR PLAN NOTESFLOOR PLAN SCOPE OF WORK1. NEW CANNABIS RETAIL ND CULTIVATION + SUPPORT SPACES2. REMODEL OF RESTROOMS3. NEW BREAK ROOM4. NEW SECURITY / RECEPTION DESK AREA
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
DN
A
1 ADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPEADJACENT SUITE NOT IN SCOPE F
2345
B C D E
6 MEZZANINE STORAGE
OFFICE OFFICE
CONFERENCEROOM
(E) STAIR CASE TO BE REMOVED
DEMO (E) STAIRCASE COMPLETE
2.6 2.6
2.6 2.6
2.11 2.13
2.6 2.11
2.13 2.132.13
2.21 2.21
OPEN TO FLOOR BELOW
5.10 5.10
EXISTING WALL TO REMAINNEW WALLWALL TO DE DEMOLISHEDABOVE, BELOW, OR HIDDEN 1t
D1
WINDOW CALLOUTDOOR CALLOUT
1t FLOOR FINISH CALLOUT
1i WALL CALLOUT
AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
T SAFETY GLAZING
DEMOLISHED
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:40 PM As indicated EXISITNG / DEMO FLOOR PLAN LVL 2 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A102 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 EXISTING / DEMO FLOOR PLAN LVL 2-PLANNING
KEYNOTESLEGEND
1. DEMOLITION IS NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO WHAT IS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. THE INTENT IS TO INDICATE THE GENERAL SCOPE OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS.
2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD SURVEY SITE OF PROPOSED WORK PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THEIR BID TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT & NATURE OF THE DEMOLITION WORK.
3. OBTAIN DEMOLITION PERMITS & INCLUDE ALL COSTS OF SAME IN CONTRACT PRICE, IF REQUIRED.4. FURNISH ALL LABOR & MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE DEMOLITION & REMOVAL OF ALL ITEMS AS INDICATED.
5. IF ANY QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY MATERIAL, CLARIFY THE POINT IN QUESTION WITH THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING.
6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCONNECT ALL POWER IN AREAS OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY BUILDING ENGINEER BEFORE THIS HAPPENS.
7. WHERE MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL SHEETS INDICATE FOR A UTILITY SYSTEM TO BE REROUTED. DISCONNECTED, OR TIED INTO
DO NOT ALTER (E) SYSTEM UNTIL THE NEW SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED, APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT, AND TESTED.
8. IN PARTITIONS TO BE REMOVED, REMOVE & CAP ALL OUTLETS, SWITCHES, WIRES. THERMOSTATS, ETC. TO THEIR SOURCE AS REQUIRED.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PATCHING AND/OR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIM OR HIS SUBCONTRACTORS TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN ELEVATOR LOBBY, PUBLIC CORRIDORS. RESTROOMS OR TENANT SPACES. REFINISH TO MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT FINISH, OR AS NOTED HEREIN.
10. REMOVE TO SOURCE ALL PIPES. VENTS, APPLIANCES OR DRAINS NOT BEING RE-USED.11. REMOVAL OF ANY EQUIPMENT, CABLING SWITCHES, & CONDUIT PERTAINING TO DATA/COMMUNICATIONS & TELEPHONE SHALL
BE VERIFIED WITH TELEPHONE COMPANIES, SERVICE OWNER OR TENANT DATA/COMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATIVE AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT NEW CONSTRUCTION DELAYS.
12. REMOVE ALL (E) IRREGULAR MATERIALS WHICH CAUSE RISES OR DEPRESSIONS IN FLOORING SURFACE, SUCH AS FASTENERS,
OUTLET CORES, COVER PLATES, RESILIENT FLOOR COVERINGS, CARPET, CARPET PAD, FLASH PATCH, CONCRETE FILL, PLYWOOD, ETC.
13. AT COMPLETION OF DEMOLITION WORK, THE CONSTRUCTION AREA(S) SHALL BE LEFT IN BROOM CLEAN CONDITION. ALL DEBRIS & MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PER BUILDING MANAGEMENT.
14. (E) CONSTRUCTION & CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DOCUMENTS REPRESENT ALL CONDITIONS KNOWN TO ARCHITECT. WHEN OTHER CONDITIONS & CONSTRUCTION ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT.
15. REMOVE ALL EXISTING FINISHES TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PARTITIONS, CARPETING, WALLCOVERING, VINYL TILE & MILLWORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. THE ARCHITECT HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON THE JOBSITE. IF ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ISOLATE THE AFFECTED AREA AND CONTACT THE OWNER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING.
17. ALL DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC CH. 33
1. RESTROOM WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES TO BE DEMOLISHED2. (E) BREAK ROOM WALLS, SINK, (E) CABINETRY AND FLOOR FINISH TO BE DEMOLISHED3. (E) WASH STATION SINKS TO BE REMOVED4. (E) RESTROOM PLUMBING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED
DEMO NOTESDEMOLITION SCOPE OF WORK
2.6 REMOVE (E) WALL & ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS2.11 REMOVE (E) DOOR, FRAME & HARDWARE2.13 EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN2.21 REMOVE (E) BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, MIRROR5.10 NEW STAIRCASE TO BE INSTALLED
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
8.9 8.9
8.9 8.9
8.9 8.9 8.9
8.9 8.9
23.19 ADJACENT SUITEADJACENT SUITE
PROPOSED
MECH. SCREEN
5' A.F.F.
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
PROPERTY LINE, 174.25'
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
P
R
O
P
E
RTY
L
I
N
E
,
1 1
5 .
8 9
'
ROOM NUMBERROOM NAME
REFERS TO TYP. INT. ELEVATION WHERE APPLIESSHEET NUMBER
DETAIL NUMBER
ROOM IDENTIFICATION
GRID LINES
ABOVE, BELOW OR HIDDENDOOR TYPE(REF: DOOR SCHEDULE)VERTICAL DATUM, ELEVATION, WORKPOINTINTERIOR ELEVATIONOR ENLARGED DRAWING BUILDING SECTIONDETAIL or ENLARGEMENTDRAWING TITLE
KEYNOTEWINDOW TYPE
BUILDING ELEVATION
DIM
DIMADA/CBC CLEARANCES
A101
1 SIM
1 View Name 1/8" = 1'-0"
0 0
WALL TYPES(REFER TO WALL TYPE SHEET)
?
NORTH ARROW
#
1 11
1 A#
A#
#
#
ROOM
NAME
1 1
1 1 A#
SPOT ELEVATION
NAME
ELEVATION
#
#
PROPERTY LINE / LIMIT OF WORK (L.O.W.)
SHEET NUMBER
DETAIL NUMBER
SETBACK LINEFLOOR TYPES(REFER TO FLOOR TYPE SHEET)
#
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:46 PM As indicated ROOF PLAN 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A203 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF PLAN
1. MOUNT TEMPERATURE SENSOR AT 48" AFF. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. DUCTWORK INSULATION SHALL BE PER MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.3. ENVIRONMENTAL EXHAUST DUCT OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM 3'-0" FROM OPENINGS BACK INTO THE BUILDING.4. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED BY AN APPROVED AGENCY. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED LISTING.
5. DUCT INSULATION SHALL HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX NOT TO EXCEED 25 AND SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX NOT TO EXCEED 50.6. REFERENCE ROOF FRAMING DETAILS S1.27. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COLLECT, STORE, PROTECT, AND REINSTALL ALL FINISHED MATERIALS EXISTING ON THE JOB SITE AND DESIGNATED FOR REUSE (E.G. - EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES.)
8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES, INCONSISTENCIES ERRORS, OMISSIONS, AMBIGUITIES AND/OR CONFLICTS TO THE ARCHITECT.
KEYNOTESROOF PLAN LEGENDROOF PLAN NOTES
8.9 (E) SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN23.19 PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
LEVEL 2
10' - 0"
ROOF LINE
20' - 0"
A B C D E F
596 SF
SECURED PICK
UP/DROP OFF
183 SF
QUARANTINE
STORAGE
161 SF
VAULT
380 SF
SECURED
INVENTORY
STORAGE
1147 SF
DISPENSARY
AREA NOT IN SCOPE
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
LEVEL 2
10' - 0"
ROOF LINE
20' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6
ADJACENT SUITE ADJACENT SUITE
910 SF
FLOWER
910 SF
FLOWER
892 SF
FLOWER
AREA NOT IN SCOPE OPEN AIR
1347 SF
HALLWAY
380 SF
SECURED
INVENTORY
STORAGE
IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:48 PM 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING SECTIONS 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A301 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 BUILDING SECTION - 13/16" = 1'-0" 2 BUILDING SECTION - 2
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
ROOF LINE
20' - 0"
ADJACENT SUITE
ADJACENT SUITE
CUSTOMER ENTRY/EXIT
CORRUGATED
METAL TYP.
GREEN
SCREEN TYP.
3 A302 FALSE FRONT
2 3' O
V
E
R
A
L
L
F
A
L
S
E
F
R
O
N
T
H
E
GI H
T
2 1' (
E
)
B
UIL
D
NI G
H
E
GI H
T
S
A701
L2 L2 3
L2
W
A
L
L
S
C
O
N
C
E
H
E
GI H
T
1 2' -
0 "
T
Y
P
.
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
ROOF LINE
20' - 0"
ADJACENT SUITE ADJACENT SUITE
EMPLOYEE
EXIT
EMPLOYEE
EXIT
EMPLOYEE
EXIT
E
X
T
.
F
L
O
O
D
L
GI H
T
H
E
GI H
T
1 7' -
0"
T
Y
P
.
LITHONIA TFX OUTDOOR LEDFLOOD LIGHT (TYP.)
LITHONIA TFX OUTDOOR LEDFLOOD LIGHT (TYP.)
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
LEVEL 2
10' - 0"
ROOF LINE
20' - 0"
1 0' -
0 "
A
W
N
NI G
HEGI H
T
2 1' (
E
)
BUIL
D
NI G
HE
GI H
TMTL. STUD S
(N) FLASHING CAP
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:54 PM As indicated ELEVATION-EAST_WEST 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A302 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 ELEVATION-EAST3/16" = 1'-0" 2 ELEVATION-WEST 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 PROPOSED FURRED OUT
COLOR AND MATERIAL SCHEME
1. CORRIGATED METAL
MANUFACTURE: PAC-CLAD7.2 PANEL - MATTE BLACK STEEL
2. PLASTER COLOR
SHERWIN WILLIAMSGREEK VILLA, SW 7551
3. DOOR & WINDOW TRIM
SHERWIN WILLIAMSNIGHT OWL, SW 7061
2. NOTE: ALL COLORS AND MATERIALS ARE BASES FOR DESIGN
3. 4.
1. 4. ENTRY DOOR
STOREFRONT FRAME
5. GREEN WALL
MANUFACTURE: GREENSCREEN5105 STEEL EDGE TRIM
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
5 6
SIGN WITH
STANDOFFS
3" 3"
2'-
1 0"
BACKLIT MILKY
WHITE ACRYLIC
BACKLIT BLUE
ACRYLIC
HALO LED
BACKLIGHTING
6' -
0 "
SIGN WITH
STANDOFFS
3" 3"
6'-
0 "
A701 7
1 8' -
1 1
"
8' -
6 "
8' -
6 "
6' - 8 1/4"
A701
8 0.5%
GALV. STEEL POST FILLED W/ CONC. AND STEEL GATESOLID ROOF STRUCTURE (SLOPE PER STORM WATER PLAN)CONC. BLOCKDEEP CONC. FOOTING FOR GATE POSTCONC. SLABCONC. FOOTINGS PER STRUCTURAL 6' PERFORATED METAL PANEL
7' - 10"
9' 6
A701
18' - 11"
LATCH ( TYP.)STEEL GATE W/ WELDED FRAME AND BRACESCANE BOLT IN SLEEVEGALV. STEEL POST FILLED W/ CONC.DEEP CONC. FOOTING FOR GATE POSTCONC. SLAB 9' -
0 "
PERFORATEDMETAL PANEL
WELDED HINGE HEAVY
DUTY - 180 SWING
CONC. BLOCK
DOOR FRAME
METAL (TYP.)
GALV. STEEL POST FILLED
W/ CONC. (SET IN
CONC. FOOTING)
2" X 4" PRESSURE TREATED WOOD4" X 6" PRESSURE TREATED WOODSKYLIFT 12" METAL SADDLE1" X 2" SYNTHETIC WOOD PRODUCT,(MYRATECH, TIMBERTECH OR SIMILAR)INSTALL (4) GALVINIZED SIMPSON SDS 1/4" X 3" SCREWS AT EACH SIDE OF BEAM
TOP OF ROOF
REF. PLAN
4" LONG 3/16" GALVANIZED LAG BOLTS
1' -
0 "
(E) PLYWOOD SHEATHING
1" X 3" SYNTHETIC WOOD PRODUCT,(MYRATECH, TIMBERTECH OR SIMILAR) 2 X 4" BLOCKINGGALVANIZED FASTENERS TYP. 1 1/2"
3 1/
2"
2 1/2"
O
R
T
O
B
E
V
E
R
FI EI D
NI F
EI L
D
5' H
EGI H
T
1" X SYNTHETIC WOOD PRODUCT,(MYRATECH, TIMBERTECH OR SIMILAR)2" X 4" PRESSURE TREATED WOOD 2" 2" 2"
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
NIGHT OWL, SW 7061
1' -
0 "
O
R
T
O
B
EV
E
RIF
EI D
NI F
EI L
D
5' -
0 "
9 A701
Sim
A701
10 Sim
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
NIGHT OWL, SW 7061
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:57 PM As indicated EXTERIOR DETAILS 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A701 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker 1" = 1'-0" 2 S01 - SECTION
1" = 1'-0" 3 S02 - ELEVATION 1" = 1'-0" 4 S02 - SECTION TOTAL SIGN AREA:28.2 SQFT
TOTAL SIGN AREA:
6 SQFT
3/16" = 1'-0" 5 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 6 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - SECTION3/16" = 1'-0" 7 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - ELEVATION 3" = 1'-0" 8 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE HINGE - DETAILS 3" = 1'-0" 9 TYP. MECHANICAL SCREEN - SECTION 3" = 1'-0" 10 MECHNICAL SCREEN SLATS 1" = 1'-0" 11 TYP. MECHANICAL SCREEN - ELEV.
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
1" = 1'-0" 1 S01 - ELEVATION
WHITE POWDERCOATED COOKIES SCRIPT SIGN (BACK-LIT HALO ILLUMINATED - LED'S @ 4000K) WHITE POWDERCOATED COOKIES C-BITE SIGN (BACK-LIT HALO ILLUMINATED - LED'S @ 4000K)
NOT USED
WIDTH OPENING
24' - 0" MIN. CLEAR
2" (HINGE CLEARANCE)
MATCH (E) FENCEFACTORY FINISHED STEEL POST PER SPECIFICATIONFACTORY FINISHED STEEL PICKETS PER SPECIFICATION1'-0"∅ CONC. FOOTING, TYP.
PROVIDE KNOX BOX FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS
FOOTING DEPTH
3'-0" MIN.
(E) DECORATIVE
FENCE. FIELD
VERIFY AND
MATCH
2".
MATCH (E) FENCE HEIGHT
FIEL VERIFY. MAX 8' HEIGHT
2% MAX. IN PATH OF TRAVEL
6'-0" STEEL PIPE FENCE
POST SIZE +1/2" G.I. PIPE
SLEEVE, FILL W/ NONSHRINK GROUT, TYP.
SURFACE, SEE PLAN
3" MIN.
1". 4' - 0"4-#3(V)
MIN.
3".
MIN.
3".
NOTE: LINE POST SPACING INTERVAL NOT TO EXCEED 10'-0"
15"ø
15"∅ x 4'-0"DEEP CONC.FTNG. (@ FENCE POSTS ONLY)#4 REBAR IN ROUND SHAPE @ 18" O.C. BETWEEN TOP AND BOTTOM TYP.
4"
8' - 0" TYPICAL SPACING
LEVEL 1
0' - 0"
7' -
0 "
A
.
F
.
F
TYP.
4"
8' - 0" TYPICAL SPACING
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:58 PM As indicated EXTERIOR DETAILS 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A702 CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 Author Checker REV DESCRIPTION DATE 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 DECORATIVE FENCE AND DOUBLE GATE
3/8" = 1'-0" 2 TYPICAL FENCE FOOTING AT POST1" = 1'-0" 4 FENCE - PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 FENCE - ELEVATION
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:58 PM
METAL PANEL DETAILS
2021
CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A703CANNABIS LICENSE
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY,CONCORD, CA 94520
Author
Checker
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
N IMPORT NOTICE:
Do not scale from drawings.
All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated.
Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects.
PROJECT NO.PROJECT ADDRESS
ISSUE DATE
SET REVISION
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
APN PROJECT TITLE159-040-037
CHECKED BYDRAWN BY
12/12/2022 3:32:59 PM
PHOTO SURVEY
2021
CONCORD MICROBUSINESS A801CANNABIS LICENSE
5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY,CONCORD, CA 94520
Author
Checker
SOUTHEAST CORNER SOUTHEAST DRIVEWAY NORTHEAST CORNER NORTHEAST DRIVEWAYSOUTHEAST STREET VIEW EAST STREET VIEW PARKING LOT VIEW FACING STREET
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
METER
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)
(28)(27)(26)(25)(24)(23)(22)
(21)
(20)(19)(18)(17)
(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45) PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
PROPERTY LINE, 174.25'
PROPERTY LINE, 202.00'
PROPERTY LINE, 115.89'
PORT CHICAGO HWY TENTANT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS 12,080 SQFT (E) CONCRETE PAD, NO CHANGE(E) PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
(E) SWITCH GEAR/ DISTRIBUTION PANEL (E) CONCRETE PAD, NO CHANGE (E) CONCRETE WALK, NOT IN SCOPE (E) MANUAL GATE, NO CHANGE (E) DRIV NO CH (N) SITE FENCE (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE BOLLARD PARKING LOT TO BE RESTRIPED TO CONFORM WITH CITY GUIDELINES BOLLARD (E) FIRE (N) GREEN SCREEN
(16) 0 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN A 5' 10' 20' IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH A NEW NETAFIM TECHLINE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO CONNECT TO EXISTING LATERAL LINES AND REPLACE EXISTING VALVES WITH NEW DRIP IRRIGATION VALVES WITH APPROVED FILTERS, AND A NEW IRRIGATION CONTROLLER W/RAIN SENSOR N IMPORT NOTICE: Do not scale from drawings. All dimensions in mm unless otherwise stated. Use figures dimensions only.
Except as allowed under the copyright act, no part of
this drawing may be reproduced or otherwise dealt
without written permission of HELEO Architects. PROJECT NO. PROJECT ADDRESS ISSUE DATE SET REVISION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR SCALE DRAWING TITLE CONSTRUCTION APN PROJECT TITLE 159-040-024-6 CHECKED BY DRAWN BY 10/21/23 As indicated 2021 CONCORD MICROBUSINESS CANNABIS LICENSE 5121 PORT CHICAGO HWY, CONCORD, CA 94520 ANGELINA SOTELO REV DESCRIPTION DATE 2643 fourth avenue San Diego, CA 92103 ph. 619.544.1977 www.asotelo.com sLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS L001 ABBR SIZE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PLANT LIST UPRIGHT SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS MEDIUM FLOWERING SHRUBS ACCENT SHRUBS LOM. LON. LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE' DWARF MAT RUSH FLOWERING TREES RHA. PIN. 5 GAL. RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'PINKIE' PINKIE INDIAN HAWTHORN XYL. CON. 5 GAL. XYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'COMPACTA' COMPACT SHINY XYLOSMA VINES TRA. JAS. 5 GAL. TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE LON. HAL. 5 GAL. LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' HALL'S JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE SEN. MAN. FLATS SENECIO MANDRALISCAE BLUE CHALK STICKS LAG. FAU. XYL. CON. RHA. PIN. LOM. LON. LON. HAL. SEN. MAN. METER (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (28) (27) (26) (25) (24) (23) (22) (21)(20) (19) (18) (17) PROPERTY LINE, 202.00' PROPERTY LINE, 115.89' TENTANT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED CANNABIS MICROBUSINESS 12,080 SQFT (E) CONCRETE WALK, NOT IN SCOPE BOLLARD PARKING LOT TO BE RESTRIPED TO CONFORM WITH CITY GUIDELINES BOLLARD (N) GREEN SCREEN (16) B MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(ETAFxLA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)] MAWA = (49.4) X (0.62) X (0.45 X 4,236.82) = 58,394.39 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE ETWU = ( ETo x 0.62 ) x ( ETAF x AREA ) WATER USE CALCULATIONS MAWA = 58,394.39 GAL/YR ETWU = 35,743.39 GAL/YR H1 - LOW WATER USE PLANTS WITH DRIP ETWU = ( 49.4 x 0.62 x 0.2 x 3,948.82/.81 ) = 29,862.82 TOTAL ETWU = 35,743.39 GAL/YEAR H2 - MEDIUM WATER USE TREES WITH BUBBLERS ETWU = ( 49.4 x 0.62 x 0.5 x 288 /.75 ) = 5,880.57 3,844.46 S.F. LOW WATER USE PLANTS WITH DRIP 288 S.F. MEDIUM WATER USE TREES WITH BUBBLERS HYDROZONE MAP & WATER USE CALCULATIONS NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN 5 GAL. LAG. FAU. 36" BOX LAGERSTROEMIA FAURIEI 'TUSCARORA' HYBRID CRAPE MYRTLE PYR. CHA. 36" BOX #PYRUS CALLERYANA 'ARISTOCRAT' ARISTOCRAT CALLERY PEAR TRA. JAS. SCALE 1"-10'-0" TRAFFIC SAFETY VISIBILITY AREA: NO LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL EXCEED 30" IN THIS AREA EXCEPT FOR TREES WITH THE LOWEST PORTION OF THEIR CANOPY MAINTAINED AT A HEIGHT OF 8' ABOVE GRADE < 4" Ø TREE TO REMAIN < 4" Ø TREE TO REMAIN < 4" Ø CRAPE MYRTLE TO REMAIN < 4" Ø CRAPE MYRTLE TO REMAIN < 4" Ø CRAPE MYRTLE TO BE RELOCATED TO PARKING LOT PLANTER AT SOUTH END OF THE SITE 6" Ø CITRUS TREE TO REMAIN 6" Ø CITRUS TREE TO REMAIN 4" Ø MULTI TRUNK CITRUS TREE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO EXCESSIVE LEAN AND CLOSENESS TO UTILITIES 21" Ø RAYWOOD ASH TO REMAIN 17" Ø RAYWOOD ASH TO REMAIN VINES ON GREENSCREEN TRELLIS ATTACHED TO BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S PLANS VINES ON GREENSCREEN TRELLIS ATTACHED TO BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S PLANS VINES ON GREENSCREEN TRELLIS ATTACHED TO BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S PLANS VINES ON GREENSCREEN TRELLIS ATTACHED TO BUILDING, PER ARCHITECT'S PLANS EXISTING GAS METERS, SCREEN WITH ACCENT PLANTS PER PLANT LIST 17" Ø RAYWOOD ASH TO REMAIN; CONTRACTOR TO MONITOR HEALTH AND LEAN DURING THE MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE PROJECT ARBORIST AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO EVALUATE THE TREE. IF RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THE TREE WITH A NEW 24" BOX RAYWOOD ASHEXISTING TREE STUM TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CRAPE MYRTLE RELOCATED FROM BUILDING ENTRY OR NEW ONE PER PLANT LIST ACCENT SHRUBS, TYPICAL MEDIUM FLOWERING TREES, TYPICAL VINES, TYPICAL MEDIUM FLOWERING SHRUBS, TYPICAL UPRIGHT SHRUBS, TYPICAL GROUNDCOVERS, TYPICAL ROOT BARRIER, TYPICAL. THIS SYMBOL ( ) EXISTIG TREE STUMP TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CRAPE MYRTLE EXISTIG TREE STUMP TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CRAPE MYRTLE Page 144 of 294 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Technical Memorandum
This technical memorandum documents Kittelson and Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) findings for a local transportation review for the proposed Infinity Concord project at 5121 Port Chicago Highway. The local transportation review consisted of determining trip generation, trip distribution, intersection operations, queue lengths, and a collision analysis near the project driveways.
Trip Generation
The Infinity Concord project is a cannabis dispensary and cultivation facility that will be 12,124 square feet with 50 employees. There are three components of the project which include the retail dispensary, a cultivation facility, and an administrative office. The allocation of the square footage and employment of the proposed project is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Size and Employment Numbers of Infinity Concord Infinity Concord Square Feet Employees
Cultivation Facility 7,307 15
Retail Dispensary 2,160 29
Administrative Office 2,657 6
Total 12,124 50
Source: Kittelson and Associates, Inc. 2022 as adapted from project plans Trip generation is traditionally estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition which does contain estimated trip generation for both a dispensary and a cultivation facility. However, there is only a single sample of a cultivation facility and it is significantly larger than the proposed project at 39,000 square feet. The dispensary category has seven samples but these seven locations are just the retail component and do not include cultivation facilities or administrative offices.
A second data source is available for cannabis dispensaries and is based on data collected by Fehr and Peers (F&P) at a retail dispensary and cultivation facility located at 3400 Wilbur Avenue in Antioch, CA called CoCo Farms. Based on driveway counts collected by F&P at this location and subtracting out the cultivation facility component based on using ITE Code 140 (Manufacturing), Table 2 shows the resulting trip generation rate per employee for just the retail dispensary component of CoCo Farms in Antioch. 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 505
Oakland, CA 94612
P 510.839.1742
August 31, 2022 Project# 25698
To: Winnie Chung, Transportation Program Manager
City of Concord
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519
From: Aaron Elias & Amaya Lim
RE: Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
ATTACHMENT 4
August 31, 2022 Page 2
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Table 2: Trip Generation Rates of CoCo Farms at 3400 Wilbur Avenue in Antioch, CA Use Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out Rate In Out
Cannabis Dispensary Per Employee 2.25 56% 44% 4.13 48% 52% 4.3 51% 49% Source: Driveway Count Data Collected by Fehr & Peers
Since neither the ITE Trip Generation Manual nor the collected CoCo Farms Antioch data includes trip generation for a cannabis dispensary that combines the retail, cultivation, and office components, Kittelson split the project into its individual components which were then summed together to determine total trip generation. For each component, trip generation was calculated per the number of employees with the rates shown in Table 3. Rates for small office (administrative office) and manufacturing (cultivation facility) were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual while the cannabis dispensary used the F&P collected rates. The resulting trip generation based on these rates is shown in Table 4 As shown, the project is estimated to generate 78 peak hour trips in the AM peak hour, 132 trips in the PM peak hour, and 127 trips for the Saturday peak hour. The Saturday numbers are only provided for informational purposes since a Saturday peak hour intersection operations analysis is not being studied given Saturday volumes are usually lower than weekday peak hour volumes and the project’s Saturday trip generation is lower compared to the weekday PM peak hour.
Table 3: Trip Generation Rates Per Employee
Use ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour
Rate In Out Rate In Out Rate In Out
Cannabis Dispensary Coco 2.25 56% 44% 4.13 48% 52% 4.3 51% 49% Small Office 712 1.05 85% 15% 1.08 33% 67% - - -
Manufacturing 140 0.32 73% 27% 0.31 37% 63% 0.1 52% 48% Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
Table 4: Estimated Trip Generation for Infinity Concord Based on Number of Employees for Each Project Component
Infinity Concord Employees AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out
Dispensary 29 66 37 29 120 58 62 125 64 61
Office 6 7 6 1 7 2 5 - - -
Cultivation 15 5 4 1 5 2 3 2 1 1
Total: 78 47 31 132 62 70 127 65 62
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
August 31, 2022 Page 3
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Trip Distribution
Trip distribution refers to how the generated trips will be distributed to the transportation network so that intersections can be assessed for project effects. Based on the land use and transportation network in the vicinity of the project, Kittelson assumed all trips would arrive from or depart to the following locations:
1. Arnold Industrial Way West of Port Chicago Highway
2. SR 4 West of Port Chicago Highway
3. SR 4 East of Port Chicago Highway
4. Port Chicago Highway South of Panoramic Drive
5. Panoramic Drive West of Port Chicago Highway
No trip distribution was assumed to Bates Avenue west of Port Chicago Highway or Port Chicago Highway north of the project due to the industrial land uses in these areas.
Trip distribution percentages to the five origin/destination (OD) zones were based on the proportion of existing traffic accessing Port Chicago Highway from these five locations. For example, if 45% of traffic originating at the five OD zones came from Port Chicago Highway south of Panoramic Drive, then 45% of project traffic was also assumed to come from this location.
Based on these assumptions and the five origin/destination nodes, the resulting distribution percentages are shown in Table 5 for trips arriving at the Project and Table 6 for trips departing the Project. Figure 1 shows the trip distribution on the map. There are also two driveway access points into the project. Kittelson assumed a 25%/75% split between the two driveways with the southern driveway getting 75% of entering and exiting traffic and the northern driveway getting 25%. The resulting volume distributed to each study intersection is provided graphically in Appendix A
Table 5: Trip Distribution for Trips Arriving at the Project # Origin Destination: Project
AM PM
1 Arnold Industrial Way West of Port Chicago Highway 3% 26% 2 SR 4 West of Port Chicago Highway 35% 5%
3 SR 4 East of Port Chicago Highway 40% 16%
4 Port Chicago Highway South of Panoramic Drive 19% 41% 5 Panoramic Drive West of Port Chicago Highway 3% 12%
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
August 31, 2022 Page 4
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Table 6: Trip Distribution for Trips Departing the Project # Destination Origin: Project
AM PM
1 Arnold Industrial Way West of Port Chicago Highway 16% 4% 2 SR 4 West of Port Chicago Highway 19% 43%
3 SR 4 East of Port Chicago Highway 36% 14%
4 Port Chicago Highway South of Panoramic Drive 27% 30% 5 Panoramic Drive West of Port Chicago Highway 2% 9%
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
August 31, 2022 Page 5
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Figure 1 Project Trip Distribution
August 31, 2022 Page 6
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Intersection Operations
Level of service (LOS) describes the operating conditions experienced by users of a facility. LOS is a qualitative measure of the effect of several factors, including speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, driving comfort, and convenience. Levels of service are designated “A” through “F” from best to worst, which cover the entire range of traffic operations that might occur. LOS “A” through “E” represent traffic volumes at less than roadway capacity, while LOS “F” represents locations over capacity and/or experiencing significant delays.
Intersection operations were evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7 th Edition
methodology and the Vistro software. The HCM 7
th Edition procedure calculates a weighted average stop delay in seconds per vehicle at an intersection and assigns a level of service designation based on the delay. Table 7 presents the relationship of average delay to level of service.
The operations results were compared with the LOS standards identified in the City of Concord’s General Plan1 and Draft Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (“Guidelines”), which include:
◼ LOS D for intersections outside the Central Business District, farther than ½ mile from a BART station, and/or not on transit routes2
◼ LOS E for intersections within the Central Business District, within ½ mile of a BART station, and/or on transit routes
◼ For transportation facilities that fail to meet LOS standards (as defined above) under No Project conditions, an increase of five or more seconds of delay compared to No Project conditions is considered a substantial effect.
The intersection of Port Chicago Highway and Panoramic Drive is within ½ mile of a BART station resulting in a LOS threshold of LOS E. All other study intersections are located outside of the downtown area, are more than ½ mile from a BART station, and only contain a single transit route resulting in a LOS D threshold.
Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Definitions
LOS Description of Traffic Conditions Average Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
A
LOS A represents free-flow travel with excellent levels of comfort and convenience and the freedom to maneuver.
≤10.0 ≤10.0
B
LOS B has stable operating conditions, but the presence of other road users causes a noticeable, though slight, reduction in comfort, convenience, and maneuvering freedom.
>10.0 and ≤20.0 >10.0 and ≤15.0
C
LOS C has stable operating conditions, but the operation of individual users is substantially affected by the interaction with others in the traffic stream.
>20.0 and ≤35.0 >15.0 and ≤25.0
D
LOS D represents high-density, but stable flow. Users
experience severe restriction in speed and freedom to
maneuver, with poor levels of comfort and convenience.
>35.0 and ≤55.0 >25.0 and ≤35.0
1 Chapter 5, Concord 2030 General Plan (https://www.cityofconcord.org/463/2030-GeneralPlan) 2 Transit routes defined as roads with two or more bus transit lines, such as Concord Avenue, Clayton Road, and Treat Boulevard
August 31, 2022 Page 7
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
LOS Description of Traffic Conditions Average Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
E
LOS E represents operating conditions at or near capacity.
Speeds are reduced to a low but relatively uniform value.
Freedom to maneuver is difficult with users experiencing frustration and poor comfort and convenience. Unstable
operation is frequent, and minor disturbances in traffic flow can cause breakdown conditions.
>55.0 and ≤80.0 >35.0 and ≤50.0
F
LOS F is used to define forced or breakdown conditions. This condition exists wherever the volume of traffic exceeds the capacity of the roadway. Long queues can form behind these bottleneck points with queued traffic traveling in a stop-and-go fashion.
>80.0 >50.0
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022 as adapted from the HCM 7th Edition Intersection operations under existing and existing plus project conditions for the AM and PM peak hours were analyzed at six intersections. These six intersections were selected in consultation with the City of Concord based on the trip distribution pattern described previously and include:
• Port Chicago Highway & Northern Project Driveway
• Port Chicago Highway & Southern Project Driveway
• Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue
• Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way
• Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramps
• Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive
Intersection turning movement counts at these six intersections were collected in 2022 for the AM and PM peak hours which are provided in Appendix B. These counts were also compared to data collected before the COVID-19 pandemic at the three intersections along Port Chicago Highway between Panoramic Drive and Arnold Industrial Way. These three pre-pandemic counts were all higher than the data collected in 2022. Therefore, the 2022 data were adjusted higher to be representative of typical conditions before the pandemic. Adjustments were also made at Bates Avenue and the two project driveways by looking at volume differences on Port Chicago Highway. The resulting analysis volumes for the AM and PM peak hours for existing no project conditions are shown in Appendix C.
The existing no project intersection operations at the six study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 8 and show all intersections operate at LOS D or better. Appendix D contains the detailed output files for existing no project conditions.
Table 8: Existing No Project Intersection Operations
ID Intersection Name Control Type
Existing AM Existing PM
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Two-way stop 0.00 9.0 A 0.00 10.3 B 2 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Two-way stop 0.01 9.0 A 0.02 9.2 A 3 Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue Signalized 0.74 31.9 C 0.75 33.8 C 4 Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Signalized 0.55 8.9 A 0.77 36.9 D 5 Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp Signalized 0.66 10.7 B 0.72 16.8 B 6 Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive Signalized 0.51 21.8 C 0.71 36.5 D Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
August 31, 2022 Page 8
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
The project trip generation and distribution were added to the no project traffic volumes to assess how the project would affect intersection operations at the six study intersections.
Based on the trip generation and distribution, Table 9 and Table 10 show the resulting intersection operations with and without the project for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. As shown, all intersections continue to operate at LOS D or better and meet the City standard. Appendix E contains the detailed output files for existing plus project conditions.
Table 9: Existing AM Intersection Operations With and Without the Project ID Intersection Name Control Type
Existing AM Existing AM Plus Project
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Two-way stop 0.00 9.0 A 0.01 9.0 A 2 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Two-way stop 0.01 9.0 A 0.04 9.2 A 3 Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue Signalized 0.74 31.9 C 0.76 32.2 C 4 Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Signalized 0.55 8.9 A 0.55 9.0 A 5 Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp Signalized 0.66 10.7 B 0.67 10.7 B 6 Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive Signalized 0.51 21.8 C 0.52 21.9 C Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
Table 10: Existing PM Intersection Operations With and Without the Project ID Intersection Name Control Type
Existing PM Existing PM Plus Project
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Two-way stop 0.00 10.3 B 0.00 10.7 B 2 Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Two-way stop 0.02 9.2 A 0.10 9.7 A 3 Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue Signalized 0.75 33.8 C 0.79 39.2 D 4 Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Signalized 0.77 36.9 D 0.78 39.1 D 5 Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp Signalized 0.72 16.8 B 0.73 17.0 B 6 Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive Signalized 0.71 36.5 D 0.72 38.3 D Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
95th Percentile Queues
The final operational analysis performed was an assessment of 95th percentile queues. These queues represent a worst-case scenario. If a 95th percentile queue can be contained within the available storage3, then there is little potential for a queue to interfere with traffic operations. The 95th percentile queue in vehicles is shown in Table 11 for the AM and PM peak hours with and without the project. The following 95 th
percentile queues were found to exceed storage and are highlighted in grey in the tables:
• Bates Avenue & Port Chicago Highway
o The northbound left turn queue was found to exceed the available storage by about five vehicles in the AM peak hour with and without the project which could potentially block the entrance to the driveway for the parking lot serving 4021 and 4071 Port Chicago Highway causing additional delay for vehicles entering/exiting this driveway. 3 Available turn bay storage for turn lanes or distance from the stop bar to the nearest upstream signal or driveway serving a large parking lot for other lanes
August 31, 2022 Page 9
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
o The southbound through movement was found to exceed the available storage by one vehicle in the PM peak hour under the no project conditions with the project adding an additional two vehicles. This could potentially block the southern driveway to the project causing additional delay for vehicles entering/exiting the driveway. o The eastbound right turn lane was found to have a queue that exceeded the available storage in the AM and PM peak hour under no project conditions potentially blocking the driveway off Bates Avenue serving 4021 and 4071 Port Chicago Highway. The Project would cause the PM peak hour right turn queue to increase by about four vehicles potentially causing additional delay for vehicles entering and exiting this driveway. • Arnold Industrial Way & Port Chicago Highway
o The eastbound right turn lane was found to have a queue that exceeded the available storage in the PM peak hour under no project conditions potentially blocking both driveways serving 2490 Arnold Industrial Way. The addition of project traffic would extend the queue by two vehicles potentially causing increased delay for vehicle entering and exiting the two driveways.
Based on Kittelson’s review of the queue data, no actions are recommended to address these queues based on the following:
• Locations where queues exceed the available storage occur under the no project condition in addition to the plus project.
• The increase in queue caused by the project was found to be four vehicle or less which would not obstruct additional driveways and only have a negligible effect on the operations of the driveways potentially being block under no project conditions.
• Queues were only found to obstruct driveways rather than affecting signalized intersections which can have a larger operational effect.
Vistro queue data outputs can be found in both the no project outputs (Appendix D) and the plus project outputs (Appendix E).
August 31, 2022 Page 10
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Table 11: 95th Percentile Queue Length (Vehicles)
# Intersection Scenario Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 1 Project Driveway N. & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 13 13 2 -
AM No Project 1 0 1 -
AM Project 1 0 1 -
PM No Project 1 0 1 -
PM Project 1 0 1 -
2 Project Driveway S. & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 7 13 2 -
AM No Project 1 0 1 -
AM Project 1 0 1 -
PM No Project 1 0 1 -
PM Project 1 0 1 -
3 Bates Ave & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 10 10 - 7 7 - 12 12 2
AM No Project 15 4 - 0 6 1 13 1
AM Project 15 5 - 0 7 1 13 1
PM No Project 4 4 - 0 8 1 20 1
PM Project 5 7 - 0 11 1 24 1
4 Arnold Industrial Way & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 13 18 - - 9 9 5 - 8 -
AM No Project 5 2 - - 2 2 1 2 -
AM Project 5 2 - - 2 3 1 2 -
PM No Project 3 2 - - 9 9 1 27 -
PM Project 3 2 - - 9 9 2 29 -
5 SR 4 WB Ramps & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 11 20 - - 17 - 12 50 -
AM No Project 3 4 - - 2 - 5 5 -
AM Project 3 4 - - 2 - 5 5 -
PM No Project 9 1 - - 9 - 3 3 -
PM Project 10 1 - - 10 - 3 3 -
6 Panoramic Drive & Port Chicago Hwy
Storage 7 40 11 16 40 40 10 10 7 20 20
AM No Project 1 7 4 8 6 6 2 2 2 2 2
AM Project 1 7 4 8 6 6 2 2 2 2 2
PM No Project 1 11 2 2 11 10 8 1 4 15 15
PM Project 1 12 2 2 11 11 8 1 4 16 16
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2022
Locations where the 95
th percentile queue exceeds the available storage are highlighted in grey
August 31, 2022 Page 11
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Collision Data
Collision data for Port Chicago Highway in the vicinity of the two project driveways was also assessed to determine if there were safety concerns. Kittelson downloaded five years of collision data (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021) from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) which tracks all collisions where a police report was issued. Over this five year period, there was one collision near the project driveways. Details of this collision include:
• The collision occurred on October 10, 2019 about 155 feet north of the intersection of Bates Avenue and Port Chicago Highway which is around the southern project driveway. The collision occurred between two vehicles where one vehicle rear ended another resulting in injuries with complaints of pain. The primary collision factor noted was unsafe speed.
Given there has only been one collision in the vicinity of the project, and it was the result of speeding rather than improper turning, the collision data does not indicate potential safety concerns with the project driveways.
Summary
The Infinity Concord project is proposing a cannabis dispensary, cultivation, and office facility at 5121 Port Chicago Highway. This technical memorandum documented the anticipated effects on the transportation infrastructure in the area and found the following:
• The project is anticipated to generate 78 weekday AM peak hour, 132 weekday PM peak hour, and 127 Saturday peak hour trips.
• Intersection operations were assessed for the AM and PM peak hours with and without the project.
The project was not found to result in an adverse effect at the six study intersections since all intersections continue to operate at LOS D or better.
• The 95th percentile queue for all lane groups at the six study intersections were reviewed to determine if the project resulted in a queue that exceeded the available turn bay storage or extended into an upstream signalized intersection or driveway serving a large parking lot. Queues exceeding storage were found at both Bates Avenue & Port Chicago Highway and at Arnold Industrial Way & Port Chicago Highway. These queues were found to occur with or without the project with the project extending some queues by four vehicles or less. Since these queues already exceeded storage, they did not block additional driveways or signalized intersections, and the increased queues were small resulting in likely minimal effects on driveway delay, Kittelson does not recommend improvements are needed to address queues. • Collision history near the two project driveways was assessed over a five-year period between 2017 and 2021. During this period, there was one collision in the vicinity which was a rear end collision caused by unsafe speed. This collision is unlikely to have been related to the proximity of the driveways given the type of collision (rear-end) and primary collision factor (unsafe speed).
Based on the findings of this local transportation assessment, the Infinity Concord project is not anticipated to have adverse effects on the local transportation infrastructure.
August 31, 2022 Page 12
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Appendix A: Project Trip Distribution
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Port Chicago Highway & SR Port Chicago Highway & Pan
Port Chicago Highway & Proj Port Chicago Highway & ProjPort Chicago Highway & Bate Port Chicago Highway & Arn Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
Port Chicago Highway & SR Port Chicago Highway & Pan
Port Chicago Highway & Proj Port Chicago Highway & ProjPort Chicago Highway & Bate Port Chicago Highway & Arn Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
August 31, 2022 Page 13
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Appendix B: 2022 TMC Data
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Northern Project Dwy QC JOB #: 15867901 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
106 112
0 106 0
11 0 0 0
0 0.85 0
3 3 0 0
11 112 0
109 123
Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:35 AM -- 7:50 AM
12.3 9.8
0 12.3 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 9.8 0
11.9 8.9
0 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Northern Project Dwy
(Eastbound)
Northern Project Dwy
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 2 12 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24
7:05 AM 1 10 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
7:10 AM 2 8 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
7:15 AM 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
7:20 AM 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
7:25 AM 0 14 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
7:30 AM 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
7:35 AM 2 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
7:40 AM 2 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22
7:45 AM 1 8 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24
7:50 AM 1 4 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
7:55 AM 0 9 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 232
8:00 AM 2 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 221
8:05 AM 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 213
8:10 AM 2 8 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 220
8:15 AM 1 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 216
8:20 AM 0 6 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 216
8:25 AM 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 204
8:30 AM 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 205
8:35 AM 0 7 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 202
8:40 AM 1 9 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 201
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 188
8:50 AM 3 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 182
8:55 AM 0 15 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 188
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 20 104 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 272
Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 4 4 8
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Northern Project Dwy QC JOB #: 15867902 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
110 115
0 110 0
2 1 0 0
0 0.89 0
6 5 0 0
2 114 0
115 116
Peak-Hour: 4:20 PM -- 5:20 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:25 PM -- 4:40 PM
0.9 1.7
0 0.9 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1.8 0
0.9 1.7
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Northern Project Dwy
(Eastbound)
Northern Project Dwy
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 5 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
4:05 PM 0 9 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
4:10 PM 0 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
4:15 PM 0 6 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17
4:20 PM 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
4:25 PM 0 12 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
4:30 PM 1 7 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21
4:35 PM 0 6 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18
4:40 PM 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 15
4:45 PM 1 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
4:50 PM 0 7 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13
4:55 PM 0 12 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 224
5:00 PM 0 11 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 229
5:05 PM 0 13 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 226
5:10 PM 0 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 225
5:15 PM 0 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 232
5:20 PM 0 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 229
5:25 PM 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 219
5:30 PM 0 8 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 211
5:35 PM 0 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 210
5:40 PM 0 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 212
5:45 PM 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 202
5:50 PM 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 199
5:55 PM 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 191
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 4 100 0 0 0 144 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 260
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Southern Project Dwy QC JOB #: 15867903 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
109 127
0 109 0
9 0 0 0
0 0.86 0
4 4 0 0
9 127 0
113 136
Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:35 AM -- 7:50 AM
12.8 8.7
0 12.8 0
11.1 0 0 0
0 0
25 25 0 0
11.1 8.7 0
13.3 8.8
0 2 5
0 0 1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Southern Project Dwy
(Eastbound)
Southern Project Dwy
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 15 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
7:05 AM 1 12 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
7:10 AM 1 10 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
7:15 AM 2 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
7:20 AM 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
7:25 AM 1 14 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
7:30 AM 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
7:35 AM 1 13 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
7:40 AM 2 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
7:45 AM 0 9 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 26
7:50 AM 1 6 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
7:55 AM 0 9 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 249
8:00 AM 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 240
8:05 AM 2 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 236
8:10 AM 1 10 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 242
8:15 AM 2 6 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 241
8:20 AM 1 7 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22 243
8:25 AM 1 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 235
8:30 AM 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 236
8:35 AM 1 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 231
8:40 AM 0 10 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 231
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 217
8:50 AM 1 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 211
8:55 AM 1 15 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 217
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 12 128 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 288
Heavy Trucks 4 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 4 4 8
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Southern Project Dwy QC JOB #: 15867904 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
119 116
0 119 0
5 0 0 0
0 0.88 0
18 18 0 0
5 116 0
137 121
Peak-Hour: 4:20 PM -- 5:20 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:25 PM -- 4:40 PM
0.8 1.7
0 0.8 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1.7 0
0.7 1.7
0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Southern Project Dwy
(Eastbound)
Southern Project Dwy
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 1 5 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
4:05 PM 1 10 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26
4:10 PM 0 7 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
4:15 PM 0 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
4:20 PM 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
4:25 PM 1 12 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 31
4:30 PM 0 8 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 23
4:35 PM 1 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
4:40 PM 1 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
4:45 PM 1 8 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
4:50 PM 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 18
4:55 PM 0 12 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 248
5:00 PM 0 11 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 27 253
5:05 PM 0 13 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 24 251
5:10 PM 0 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 248
5:15 PM 1 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 258
5:20 PM 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 254
5:25 PM 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 238
5:30 PM 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 233
5:35 PM 0 6 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 235
5:40 PM 1 11 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 235
5:45 PM 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 226
5:50 PM 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 218
5:55 PM 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 209
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 8 104 0 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 292
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- SR 4 EB Loop Ramps QC JOB #: 15867907 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
470 923
144 326 0
144 0 538 538
0 0.94 0
0 0 0 0
0 385 0
326 385
Peak-Hour: 7:20 AM -- 8:20 AM
Peak 15-Min: 7:50 AM -- 8:05 AM
17 3.5
26.4 12.9 0
26.4 0 4.1 4.1
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2.6 0
12.9 2.6
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
SR 4 EB Loop Ramps
(Eastbound)
SR 4 EB Loop Ramps
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 21 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 86
7:05 AM 0 21 0 0 0 19 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 103
7:10 AM 0 25 0 0 0 16 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 91
7:15 AM 0 24 0 0 0 23 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 102
7:20 AM 0 37 0 0 0 22 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 100
7:25 AM 0 30 0 0 0 17 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 108
7:30 AM 0 30 0 0 0 34 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 122
7:35 AM 0 38 0 0 0 20 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 112
7:40 AM 0 28 0 0 0 26 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 129
7:45 AM 0 40 0 0 0 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 110
7:50 AM 0 32 0 0 0 29 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 117
7:55 AM 0 31 0 0 0 26 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 122 1302
8:00 AM 0 32 0 0 0 33 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 133 1349
8:05 AM 0 33 0 0 0 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 113 1359
8:10 AM 0 26 0 0 0 36 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 117 1385
8:15 AM 0 28 0 0 0 33 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 110 1393
8:20 AM 0 20 0 0 0 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 99 1392
8:25 AM 0 21 0 0 0 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 96 1380
8:30 AM 0 25 0 0 0 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 88 1346
8:35 AM 0 23 0 0 0 26 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 101 1335
8:40 AM 0 25 0 0 0 32 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 111 1317
8:45 AM 0 24 0 0 0 23 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 91 1298
8:50 AM 0 31 0 0 0 24 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 102 1283
8:55 AM 0 26 0 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 109 1270
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 380 0 0 0 352 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 652 0 1488 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 48 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 100
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- SR 4 EB Loop Ramps QC JOB #: 15867908 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
970 340
318 652 0
318 0 90 90
0 0.86 0
0 0 0 0
0 250 0
652 250
Peak-Hour: 4:20 PM -- 5:20 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM -- 5:20 PM
2.5 9.1
3.5 2 0
3.5 0 15.6 15.6
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 6.8 0
2 6.8
0 0 0
0 0 2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
SR 4 EB Loop Ramps
(Eastbound)
SR 4 EB Loop Ramps
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 13 0 0 0 64 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 103
4:05 PM 0 28 0 0 0 69 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 144
4:10 PM 0 23 0 0 0 62 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 126
4:15 PM 0 19 0 0 0 46 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 93
4:20 PM 0 23 0 0 0 41 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 98
4:25 PM 0 23 0 0 0 47 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 102
4:30 PM 0 21 0 0 0 50 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 114
4:35 PM 0 20 0 0 0 73 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 128
4:40 PM 0 22 0 0 0 49 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 108
4:45 PM 0 14 0 0 0 51 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 85
4:50 PM 0 23 0 0 0 52 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 101
4:55 PM 0 24 0 0 0 41 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 96 1298
5:00 PM 0 16 0 0 0 48 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 97 1292
5:05 PM 0 15 0 0 0 73 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 129 1277
5:10 PM 0 19 0 0 0 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 124 1275
5:15 PM 0 30 0 0 0 67 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 128 1310
5:20 PM 0 24 0 0 0 34 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 84 1296
5:25 PM 0 36 0 0 0 37 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 94 1288
5:30 PM 0 26 0 0 0 34 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 93 1267
5:35 PM 0 16 0 0 0 62 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 120 1259
5:40 PM 0 30 0 0 0 37 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 107 1258
5:45 PM 0 16 0 0 0 28 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 74 1247
5:50 PM 0 21 0 0 0 31 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 1209
5:55 PM 0 26 0 0 0 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 73 1186
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 256 0 0 0 800 388 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 1524 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 0 24 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 56
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Panoramic Dr QC JOB #: 15867905 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
463 502
28 368 67
37 52 26 50
2 0.90 1
77 23 23 105
8 423 37
414 468
Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM -- 8:15 AM
8.4 3.4
7.1 9 6
5.4 3.8 7.7 8
0 0
3.9 4.3 8.7 4.8
0 3.1 2.7
8.7 3
0 1 3
12 0 0 0
0 3
0 1
1 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Panoramic Dr
(Eastbound)
Panoramic Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 1 21 6 0 5 16 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 60
7:05 AM 0 23 0 0 8 15 3 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 58
7:10 AM 0 27 2 0 8 14 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 56
7:15 AM 0 36 3 0 4 31 3 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 86
7:20 AM 1 37 4 0 6 20 3 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 78
7:25 AM 1 25 2 0 2 17 2 0 5 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 66
7:30 AM 0 38 3 0 13 38 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 100
7:35 AM 0 36 5 0 2 23 1 0 10 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 83
7:40 AM 0 32 5 0 8 31 1 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 86
7:45 AM 0 40 2 0 6 25 1 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 87
7:50 AM 2 40 2 0 7 33 3 0 6 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 99
7:55 AM 2 27 3 0 3 27 2 0 6 1 3 0 1 0 4 0 79 938
8:00 AM 1 42 5 0 5 45 6 0 1 0 3 0 4 1 0 0 113 991
8:05 AM 1 35 0 0 2 39 0 0 3 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 88 1021
8:10 AM 0 35 3 0 8 39 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 93 1058
8:15 AM 0 25 1 0 2 38 1 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 76 1048
8:20 AM 2 29 1 0 4 31 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 75 1045
8:25 AM 1 30 0 0 7 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 75 1054
8:30 AM 1 34 1 0 2 24 1 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 75 1029
8:35 AM 0 22 2 0 4 25 1 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 64 1010
8:40 AM 0 29 1 0 2 31 1 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 74 998
8:45 AM 0 26 1 0 3 31 4 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 74 985
8:50 AM 0 36 2 0 1 30 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 74 960
8:55 AM 0 24 1 0 1 28 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 67 948
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 8 448 32 0 60 492 44 0 24 0 16 0 32 4 16 0 1176 Heavy Trucks 0 16 0 4 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
Buses
Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Port Chicago Hwy -- Panoramic Dr QC JOB #: 15867906 CITY/STATE: Concord, CA DATE: Tue, Jun 28 2022
716 1154
65 459 192
92 160 174 204
3 0.89 3
184 21 27 153
24 765 13
507 802
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM -- 5:20 PM
1.5 3.3
0 1.7 1.6
0 6.3 1.7 2
0 0
6 4.8 3.7 2.6
0 3.3 7.7
2 3.2
0 0 1
4 0 0 3
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Port Chicago Hwy
(Northbound)
Port Chicago Hwy
(Southbound)
Panoramic Dr
(Eastbound)
Panoramic Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 1 59 0 0 15 39 7 2 15 0 1 0 1 1 13 0 154
4:05 PM 0 70 0 0 20 41 6 5 12 1 2 0 2 0 20 0 179
4:10 PM 1 67 3 0 26 47 6 1 11 0 2 0 2 0 21 0 187
4:15 PM 3 48 1 0 12 31 3 7 14 0 2 0 4 0 19 0 144
4:20 PM 0 74 1 0 2 38 5 1 13 1 2 0 2 0 10 0 149
4:25 PM 0 51 0 0 3 36 4 3 17 0 3 0 3 1 5 0 126
4:30 PM 1 62 0 0 6 42 7 8 11 0 2 0 1 0 8 0 148
4:35 PM 0 51 2 0 14 37 5 5 27 0 2 0 1 0 15 0 159
4:40 PM 0 73 1 0 12 51 5 2 12 0 1 0 4 0 11 0 172
4:45 PM 1 66 2 0 13 35 5 7 12 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 153
4:50 PM 6 50 1 0 12 39 4 5 14 0 3 0 5 0 16 0 155
4:55 PM 5 62 0 0 9 30 5 6 10 0 2 0 2 0 11 0 142 1868
5:00 PM 1 64 1 0 9 36 2 3 12 1 1 0 0 0 10 0 140 1854
5:05 PM 2 59 0 0 14 53 8 6 9 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 165 1840
5:10 PM 2 61 2 0 17 43 5 4 11 1 0 0 7 2 32 0 187 1840
5:15 PM 2 73 2 0 14 38 7 7 16 1 2 0 4 0 18 0 184 1880
5:20 PM 3 69 0 0 8 28 8 2 9 0 1 0 0 1 19 0 148 1879
5:25 PM 1 75 2 0 9 27 4 0 17 0 3 0 2 0 13 0 153 1906
5:30 PM 1 52 5 0 9 26 11 3 11 0 1 0 3 0 8 0 130 1888
5:35 PM 1 67 0 0 6 47 8 3 10 0 3 0 4 1 9 0 159 1888
5:40 PM 2 64 2 0 4 27 7 9 7 0 2 0 0 0 18 0 142 1858
5:45 PM 3 57 1 0 4 20 9 4 21 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 126 1831
5:50 PM 6 54 0 0 3 25 8 1 17 0 1 0 2 1 4 0 122 1798
5:55 PM 1 60 3 0 6 28 3 1 7 0 0 0 3 0 17 0 129 1785
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 24 772 16 0 180 536 80 68 144 8 16 0 48 8 244 0 2144 Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 4 8 0 12 0 0 0 0 4 52
Buses
Pedestrians 8 0 0 0 8
Bicycles 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:
Report generated on 7/6/2022 12:48 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
August 31, 2022 Page 14
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Appendix C: Existing No Project Volumes
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Port Chicago Highway & SR Port Chicago Highway & Pan
Port Chicago Highway & Proj Port Chicago Highway & ProjPort Chicago Highway & Bate Port Chicago Highway & Arn Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
Port Chicago Highway & SR Port Chicago Highway & Pan
Port Chicago Highway & Proj Port Chicago Highway & ProjPort Chicago Highway & Bate Port Chicago Highway & Arn Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
August 31, 2022 Page 15
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Appendix D: Vistro No Project Outputs
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: H:\...\Existing AM.pdf 8/8/2022
Vistro File: H:\...\25628.5_ConcordInfinity_20220805.vistro Scenario 1 Existing AM Infinity Concord
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
NB Left 0.513 21.8 C
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Panoramic Drive 6 NB Left 0.658 10.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway & SR 4WB Ramp 5 EB Right 0.545 8.9 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Arnold Industrial Way 4 WB Thru 0.742 31.9 C
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Bates Avenue 3 EB Right 0.006 9.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway South 2 EB Right 0.004 9.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway North 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.004
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 13 174 136 0 0 4
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 3 44 34 0 0 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 11 148 116 0 0 3
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 9.80 0.00 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 11 148 116 0 0 3
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.41
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.53 0.00 8.96
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 8.96 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.006
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10 185 138 0 0 5
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 3 46 35 0 0 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 159 119 0 0 4
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 8.70 12.80 0.00 0.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 159 119 0 0 4
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.36
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.39 0.00 8.99
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.42 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.57 8.99 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.742
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 31.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 967 176 1 0 124 9 3 0 337 0 1 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 242 44 0 0 31 2 1 0 84 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 899 164 1 0 115 8 3 0 313 0 1 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 6.70 6.90 0.00 0.00 13.90 0.00 2.00 0.00 29.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 899 164 1 0 115 8 3 0 313 0 1 1 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall Yes Yes No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.5 3.5 0.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No Yes
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.5 4.5 0.0 3.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 45 50 0 25 50 0 0 45 0 0 45 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 12 0 6 12 0 0 6 0 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 358.72 89.82 0.00 130.97 2.00 311.18 2.84 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 14.35 3.59 0.00 5.24 0.08 12.45 0.11 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 233.44 49.90 0.00 72.76 1.11 196.29 1.58 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 9.34 2.00 0.00 2.91 0.04 7.85 0.06 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
Lane Group LOS C B A D C D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 30.40 14.63 0.00 41.66 22.08 41.23 48.59 X, volume / capacity 0.86 0.21 0.00 0.62 0.01 0.89 0.11 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.11 0.18 0.00 4.06 0.01 10.93 3.86 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 28.29 14.45 0.00 37.60 22.07 30.30 44.73 c, Capacity [veh/h] 1120 836 0 215 552 377 18
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3328 1795 1810 1671 1810 1236 1746 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.29 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.27 0.00 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.34 0.47 0.00 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.01 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 42 0 12 28 28 1
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.50 3.50 2.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.50 5.50 4.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Lane Group L C L C C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 30.40 14.63 14.63 0.00 41.66 41.66 22.08 22.08 41.23 48.59 48.59 48.59 Movement LOS C B B A D D C C D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 27.96 41.66 41.06 48.59
Approach LOS C D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 31.86
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.742
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 14.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 5896.23 9700.14 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 32.60 35.19 35.19
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.090 2.506 1.717 Crosswalk LOS F B B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1098 1098 988 988 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 9.25 9.25 11.65 11.65
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 0.446 0.493 2.121 1.563 Bicycle LOS A A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.545
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 8.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 120.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 386 1410 488 26 11 114
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 97 353 122 7 3 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 340 1241 429 23 10 100
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 10.30 6.10 16.80 13.30 16.70 21.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 340 1241 429 23 10 100
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 29
Pedestrian Walk [s] 5
Pedestrian Signal Group 4
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.5 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 20 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 0 4 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 40 40 40 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 10 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 3 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 115.94 27.29 44.71 46.83 3.78 46.70 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.64 1.09 1.79 1.87 0.15 1.87 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 64.41 15.16 24.84 26.02 2.10 25.94 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.58 0.61 0.99 1.04 0.08 1.04 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B A B B B C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 15.57 4.45 13.07 13.44 16.55 20.87 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.46 0.41 0.40 0.06 0.76
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.51 0.16 0.47 0.88 0.06 2.97 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.04
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 14.05 4.29 12.60 12.56 16.50 17.90 c, Capacity [veh/h] 464 3034 830 425 175 150
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1662 4926 3137 1605 1571 1343 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.23 0.29 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.08 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.62 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.11
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 12 25 11 11 5 5
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.50 3.50 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.50 5.50 C, Cycle Length [s] 41 41 41 41 41 41
Lane Group L C C C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 15.57 4.45 13.18 13.44 16.55 20.87 Movement LOS B A B B B C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.84 13.19 20.49
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 8.88
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.545
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 9480.44 8046.57 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 12.68 12.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.884 2.074 Crosswalk LOS F C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1932 1932 966 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.02 0.02 5.53
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.547 1.842 0.273 Bicycle LOS B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.658
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 265.00 100.00 265.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 202 1144 0 0 281 281 0 0 0 533 110 789 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 51 286 0 0 70 70 0 0 0 133 27 197 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9100 0.9100 1.0000 1.0000 0.9100 0.9100 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 184 1041 0 0 256 256 0 0 0 485 100 718 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.50 6.10 2.00 2.00 16.60 20.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.80 0.00 4.60 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 184 1041 0 0 256 256 0 0 0 485 100 718 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 15 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 4 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Permis Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 73.02 82.11 36.56 107.80 109.72 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.92 3.28 1.46 4.31 4.39 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 40.57 45.62 20.31 59.89 60.95 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.62 1.82 0.81 2.40 2.44 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS B A B B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 17.63 6.23 11.66 16.13 16.06 X, volume / capacity 0.65 0.60 0.32 0.72 0.72
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.32 0.30 0.21 2.26 2.20
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 15.31 5.92 11.45 13.86 13.86
c, Capacity [veh/h] 310 1912 874 440 450
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1745 3443 3143 1798 1839 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.33 0.09 0.18 0.18 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.56 0.28 0.24 0.24
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 22 11 10 10
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 40 40 40 40 40
Lane Group L C C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.63 6.23 0.00 0.00 11.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.10 16.06 0.00 Movement LOS B A B B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 7.94 11.66 0.00 16.09
Approach LOS A B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.71
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.658
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 12.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 9.72 10.43 10.43
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.633 1.679 2.101 Crosswalk LOS F B A B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1607 1607 0 1004 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.77 0.77 19.92 4.94
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.670 1.791 4.132 2.621 Bicycle LOS B A D B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.513
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 21.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 240.00 385.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 4
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 551 137 599 580 27 72 7 39 74 6 103 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 138 34 150 145 7 18 2 10 19 1 26 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 496 123 539 522 24 65 6 35 67 5 93 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 3.10 2.70 6.00 9.00 7.10 3.80 0.00 4.30 8.70 0.00 7.70 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 496 123 539 522 24 65 6 35 67 5 93 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes No Yes No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 24 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 25 45 0 25 45 0 0 35 0 0 15 0
Minimum Green [s] 8 10 0 9 10 0 0 9 0 0 8 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 4 0 0 3 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.79 169.74 78.64 193.77 129.84 128.01 43.48 27.44 48.55 36.63 34.18 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.51 6.79 3.15 7.75 5.19 5.12 1.74 1.10 1.94 1.47 1.37 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 7.11 94.30 43.69 108.40 72.13 71.12 24.16 15.24 26.97 20.35 18.99 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.28 3.77 1.75 4.34 2.89 2.84 0.97 0.61 1.08 0.81 0.76 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS C C C C B B C C C C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 34.20 24.00 21.94 25.98 13.35 13.36 24.28 23.86 27.45 26.97 27.03 X, volume / capacity 0.28 0.67 0.37 0.79 0.40 0.40 0.24 0.17 0.35 0.28 0.28 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.72 0.93 0.62 1.84 0.34 0.35 0.41 0.29 0.96 0.72 0.79 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 31.47 23.07 21.32 24.14 13.00 13.01 23.87 23.57 26.49 26.25 26.24 c, Capacity [veh/h] 56 828 369 762 761 749 298 273 214 205 189 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1810 3529 1574 3348 1765 1737 1755 1604 1685 1613 1488 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.43 0.43 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.13 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 16 16 15 29 29 11 11 8 8 8 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
Lane Group L C R L C C L C L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.20 24.00 21.94 25.98 13.35 13.36 24.28 23.86 23.86 27.45 26.97 27.00 Movement LOS C C C C B B C C C C C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 23.83 19.62 24.12 27.18
Approach LOS C B C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.83
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.513
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 -4.7 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 23.09 38.04 23.09 23.09
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.663 2.866 1.978 2.464 Crosswalk LOS B C A B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1357 1357 1055 452 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 3.43 3.43 7.41 19.91
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.140 2.555 1.754 1.862 Bicycle LOS B B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: H:\...\Existing PM.pdf 8/8/2022
Vistro File: H:\...\25628.5_ConcordInfinity_20220805.vistro Scenario 2 Existing PM Infinity Concord
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
WB Right 0.710 36.5 D
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Panoramic Drive 6 NB Left 0.720 16.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway & SR 4WB Ramp 5 EB Right 0.770 36.9 D
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Arnold Industrial Way 4 WB Right 0.753 33.8 C
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Bates Avenue 3 EB Right 0.023 9.2 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway South 2 EB Left 0.001 10.3 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway North 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.001
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2 135 163 0 1 6
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 34 41 0 0 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 2 120 145 0 1 5
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 1.80 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 2 120 145 0 1 5
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.26
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.11 0.00 9.28
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.26 9.11 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.023
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6 139 170 0 0 20
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 35 43 0 0 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 122 150 0 0 18
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 1.70 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 122 150 0 0 18
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.69
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.31 0.00 9.21
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.46 9.21 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.753
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 33.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 220 133 0 0 190 10 17 0 701 0 0 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 55 33 0 0 48 2 4 0 175 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 185 112 0 0 160 8 14 0 589 0 0 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 33.90 5.80 0.00 0.00 1.90 25.00 14.30 0.00 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 185 112 0 0 160 8 14 0 589 0 0 1 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall Yes Yes No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.5 3.5 0.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No Yes
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.5 4.5 0.0 3.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 45 50 0 25 50 0 0 45 0 0 45 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 12 0 6 12 0 0 6 0 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 94.97 86.77 0.00 175.89 6.73 495.95 1.78 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.80 3.47 0.00 7.04 0.27 19.84 0.07 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 52.76 48.20 0.00 97.72 3.74 343.89 0.99 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.11 1.93 0.00 3.91 0.15 13.76 0.04 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
Lane Group LOS D C A D B C D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 38.08 24.17 0.00 38.34 10.94 33.47 48.89 X, volume / capacity 0.73 0.28 0.00 0.73 0.02 0.93 0.12 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 3.40 0.44 0.00 5.23 0.01 13.86 8.61 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.33 0.15 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 34.68 23.73 0.00 33.11 10.93 19.61 40.28 c, Capacity [veh/h] 301 480 0 274 876 758 8
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 2573 1813 1810 1855 1810 1565 1615 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.45 0.00 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.12 0.26 0.00 0.15 0.48 0.48 0.01 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 9 22 0 12 39 39 0
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.50 3.50 2.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.50 5.50 4.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Lane Group L C L C C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 38.08 24.17 24.17 0.00 38.34 38.34 10.94 10.94 33.47 48.89 48.89 48.89 Movement LOS D C C A D D B B C D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 32.84 38.34 32.94 48.89
Approach LOS C D C D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 33.77
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.753
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 14.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 13222.83 10875.92 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 27.82 30.36 30.36
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.102 2.395 1.710 Crosswalk LOS F B B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1231 1231 1108 1108 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 6.00 6.00 8.08 8.08
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection -0.860 0.603 2.744 1.561 Bicycle LOS A A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.770
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 36.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 120.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 98 340 1307 10 32 541
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 85 327 3 8 135
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 85 296 1137 9 28 471
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 33.90 17.60 3.60 18.20 9.30 2.40 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 85 296 1137 9 28 471
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 29
Pedestrian Walk [s] 5
Pedestrian Signal Group 4
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.5 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 20 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 0 4 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 40 40 40 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 10 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 3 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 71.02 29.89 206.60 208.15 14.63 651.41 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.84 1.20 8.26 8.33 0.59 26.06 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 39.46 16.61 117.66 118.78 8.13 435.48 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.58 0.66 4.71 4.75 0.33 17.42 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS D A B B B F
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 35.38 8.47 17.69 17.98 16.39 102.75 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.15 0.66 0.63 0.06 1.13
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.75 0.04 0.79 1.32 0.02 79.72 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.46
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 29.63 8.43 16.90 16.66 16.37 23.03 c, Capacity [veh/h] 117 2293 1337 700 508 480
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1325 4456 3515 1839 1677 1584 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.07 0.08 0.25 0.24 0.02 0.34 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.09 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.30
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 6 34 25 25 20 20
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.50 3.50 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.50 5.50 C, Cycle Length [s] 66 66 66 66 66 66
Lane Group L C C C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 35.38 8.47 17.79 17.98 16.39 102.75 Movement LOS D A B B B F
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.49 17.79 97.93
Approach LOS B B F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 36.89
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.770
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 3966.03 5124.53 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 24.60 24.60
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.850 2.147 Crosswalk LOS F C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1213 1213 606 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 5.11 5.11 16.01
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.801 2.284 0.273 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.720
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 16.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 265.00 100.00 265.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 334 288 0 0 1132 764 0 0 0 173 2 174 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 84 72 0 0 283 191 0 0 0 43 1 43 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 1.0000 1.0000 0.8800 0.8800 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 294 253 0 0 996 672 0 0 0 152 2 153 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 27.00 20.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.40 0.00 19.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 294 253 0 0 996 672 0 0 0 152 2 153 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 15 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 4 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Permis Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 217.91 4.95 222.29 52.27 52.81 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.72 0.20 8.89 2.09 2.11 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 125.90 2.75 129.11 29.04 29.34 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 5.04 0.11 5.16 1.16 1.17 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C A B C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 32.13 1.64 14.46 27.69 27.64 X, volume / capacity 0.85 0.12 0.76 0.57 0.57
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 13.25 0.02 0.81 3.33 3.29
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 18.89 1.61 13.64 24.35 24.35
c, Capacity [veh/h] 395 2346 1492 152 154
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1424 3046 3546 1790 1811 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.23 0.09 0.32 0.05 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.77 0.42 0.09 0.09
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 15 43 23 5 5
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 55 55 55 55 55
Lane Group L C C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 32.13 1.64 0.00 0.00 14.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.66 27.64 0.00 Movement LOS C A B C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 18.01 14.46 0.00 27.66
Approach LOS B B A C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 16.80
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.720
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 12.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 16.93 17.72 17.72
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.654 1.724 1.970 Crosswalk LOS F B A A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1158 1158 0 724 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 4.90 4.90 27.63 11.25
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.073 2.494 4.132 1.848 Bicycle LOS B B D A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.710
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 36.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 240.00 385.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 27 810 48 112 612 203 230 6 22 131 6 636 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 203 12 28 153 51 58 1 6 33 1 159 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 24 721 43 100 545 181 205 5 20 117 5 566 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 3.30 7.70 1.60 1.70 0.00 6.30 0.00 4.80 3.70 0.00 1.70 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 24 721 43 100 545 181 205 5 20 117 5 566 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes No Yes No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 24 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 25 45 0 25 45 0 0 35 0 0 15 0
Minimum Green [s] 8 10 0 9 10 0 0 9 0 0 8 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 4 0 0 3 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 23.79 267.87 27.49 43.05 254.12 237.47 186.75 19.13 92.25 369.50 366.05 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.95 10.71 1.10 1.72 10.16 9.50 7.47 0.77 3.69 14.78 14.64 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 13.22 163.13 15.27 23.92 152.77 140.33 103.75 10.63 51.25 241.95 239.22 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.53 6.53 0.61 0.96 6.11 5.61 4.15 0.43 2.05 9.68 9.57 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D C B C C C C C C E E
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 37.67 25.79 19.63 32.11 21.41 21.50 32.99 26.26 26.89 74.35 74.93 X, volume / capacity 0.32 0.77 0.11 0.30 0.63 0.63 0.73 0.09 0.36 0.99 0.99 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.20 1.23 0.10 0.45 0.99 1.08 3.34 0.13 0.62 43.88 44.55 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.43 0.43 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 35.47 24.56 19.53 31.66 20.42 20.42 29.65 26.13 26.27 30.48 30.38 c, Capacity [veh/h] 84 1051 452 371 673 616 313 302 359 327 321 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1810 3523 1515 3470 1874 1717 1719 1660 1757 1599 1572 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.23 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.02 0.07 0.20 0.20 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.20 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 4 23 23 8 27 27 14 14 16 16 16 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Lane Group L C R L C C L C L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 37.67 25.79 19.63 32.11 21.43 21.50 32.99 26.26 26.26 26.89 74.35 74.64 Movement LOS D C B C C C C C C C E E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 25.82 22.74 32.26 66.55
Approach LOS C C C E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 36.47
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.710
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 -4.7 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 28.11 43.17 28.11 28.11
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.712 2.965 2.092 2.474 Crosswalk LOS B C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1174 1174 913 391 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 6.53 6.53 11.31 24.80
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.290 2.324 1.985 2.835 Bicycle LOS B B A C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 2: 2 Existing PM
Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
August 31, 2022 Page 16
Infinity Concord Local Transportation Review
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Appendix E: Vistro Existing Plus Project
Outputs
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: H:\...\Existing AM_PPpdf.pdf 8/8/2022
Vistro File: H:\...\25628.5_ConcordInfinity_20220805.vistro Scenario 3 Existing AM Plus Project Infinity Concord
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
NB Left 0.516 21.9 C
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Panoramic Drive 6 NB Left 0.668 10.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway & SR 4WB Ramp 5 EB Right 0.554 9.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Arnold Industrial Way 4 WB Thru 0.764 32.2 C
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Bates Avenue 3 EB Right 0.035 9.2 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway South 2 EB Right 0.014 9.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway North 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.014
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 27 174 136 0 0 13
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 44 34 0 0 3
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 23 148 116 0 0 11
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 12 0 0 0 0 8
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 9.80 0.00 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 11 148 116 0 0 3
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.92
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.02 0.00 9.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.14 1.14 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.84 9.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.035
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 51 199 148 0 0 31
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 13 50 37 0 0 8
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 0.8600 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 44 171 127 0 0 27
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 35 12 8 0 0 23
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 8.70 12.80 0.00 0.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 159 119 0 0 4
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.56
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.55 0.00 9.17
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 2.69 2.69 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.74 9.17 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.764
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 32.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 967 227 1 0 157 9 3 0 337 0 1 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 242 57 0 0 39 2 1 0 84 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 0.9300 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 899 211 1 0 146 8 3 0 313 0 1 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 47 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 6.70 6.90 0.00 0.00 13.90 0.00 2.00 0.00 29.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 899 164 1 0 115 8 3 0 313 0 1 1 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall Yes Yes No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.5 3.5 0.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No Yes
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.5 4.5 0.0 3.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 45 50 0 25 50 0 0 45 0 0 45 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 12 0 6 12 0 0 6 0 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 360.89 119.93 0.00 173.85 2.01 313.25 2.85 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 14.44 4.80 0.00 6.95 0.08 12.53 0.11 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 235.14 66.63 0.00 96.58 1.12 197.90 1.58 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 9.41 2.67 0.00 3.86 0.04 7.92 0.06 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
Lane Group LOS C B A D C D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 30.60 15.16 0.00 45.82 22.21 41.60 48.82 X, volume / capacity 0.86 0.27 0.00 0.76 0.01 0.90 0.11 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.14 0.25 0.00 7.39 0.01 11.13 3.88 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 28.46 14.91 0.00 38.42 22.20 30.47 44.94 c, Capacity [veh/h] 1119 838 0 219 551 376 18
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3328 1795 1810 1675 1810 1236 1746 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.29 0.13 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.27 0.00 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.34 0.47 0.00 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.01 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 31 43 0 12 28 28 1
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.50 3.50 2.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.50 5.50 4.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Lane Group L C L C C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 30.60 15.16 15.16 0.00 45.82 45.82 22.21 22.21 41.60 48.82 48.82 48.82 Movement LOS C B B A D D C C D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 27.65 45.82 41.43 48.82
Approach LOS C D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 32.20
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.764
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 14.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 5866.85 9651.06 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 32.82 35.41 35.41
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.131 2.506 1.717 Crosswalk LOS F B B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1093 1093 984 984 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 9.41 9.41 11.82 11.82
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 0.530 0.547 2.121 1.563 Bicycle LOS A A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.554
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 120.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 386 1463 517 32 13 114
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 97 366 129 8 3 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 340 1287 455 28 11 100
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 46 26 5 1 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 10.30 6.10 16.80 13.30 16.70 21.30 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 340 1241 429 23 10 100
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 29
Pedestrian Walk [s] 5
Pedestrian Signal Group 4
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.5 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 20 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 0 4 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 40 40 40 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 10 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 3 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 116.24 29.14 48.44 50.87 4.48 46.62 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.65 1.17 1.94 2.03 0.18 1.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 64.58 16.19 26.91 28.26 2.49 25.90 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.58 0.65 1.08 1.13 0.10 1.04 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B A B B B C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 15.58 4.54 13.27 13.71 16.59 20.79 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.48 0.44 0.43 0.07 0.76
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.51 0.17 0.53 1.00 0.07 2.88 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.04
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 14.08 4.37 12.74 12.71 16.52 17.91 c, Capacity [veh/h] 464 3033 830 423 176 151
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1662 4926 3137 1599 1571 1343 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.23 0.30 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.08 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.62 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.11
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 12 26 11 11 5 5
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.50 3.50 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.50 5.50 C, Cycle Length [s] 41 41 41 41 41 41
Lane Group L C C C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 15.58 4.54 13.39 13.71 16.59 20.79 Movement LOS B A B B B C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.84 13.41 20.36
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 8.95
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.554
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 9463.09 7960.11 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 12.71 12.71
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.906 2.077 Crosswalk LOS F C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1929 1929 964 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.03 0.03 5.56
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.577 1.862 0.273 Bicycle LOS B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.668
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 265.00 100.00 265.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 1 1 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 202 1173 0 0 303 288 0 0 0 533 110 811 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 51 293 0 0 76 72 0 0 0 133 27 203 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9100 0.9100 1.0000 1.0000 0.9100 0.9100 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9100 0.9100 0.9100 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 184 1067 0 0 276 262 0 0 0 485 100 738 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 26 0 0 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 20 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 4.50 6.10 2.00 2.00 16.60 20.70 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.80 0.00 4.60 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 184 1041 0 0 256 256 0 0 0 485 100 718 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 15 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 4 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Permis Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 73.38 85.59 39.84 108.40 110.33 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.94 3.42 1.59 4.34 4.41 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 40.77 47.55 22.13 60.22 61.29 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.63 1.90 0.89 2.41 2.45 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS B A B B B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 17.70 6.31 11.77 16.20 16.13 X, volume / capacity 0.65 0.61 0.35 0.72 0.72
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.33 0.32 0.23 2.28 2.21
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 15.36 5.99 11.53 13.92 13.91
c, Capacity [veh/h] 309 1915 878 440 450
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1745 3443 3143 1798 1839 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.34 0.10 0.18 0.18 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.56 0.28 0.24 0.24
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 22 11 10 10
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 40 40 40 40 40
Lane Group L C C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.70 6.31 0.00 0.00 11.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.17 16.13 0.00 Movement LOS B A B B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 7.99 11.77 0.00 16.16
Approach LOS A B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.74
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.668
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 12.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 9.78 10.50 10.50
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.641 1.679 2.101 Crosswalk LOS F B A B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1601 1601 0 1001 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 0.79 0.79 19.98 4.99
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.694 1.810 4.132 2.621 Bicycle LOS B A D B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.516
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 21.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 240.00 385.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 1 4
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 561 137 599 589 28 73 7 39 74 6 103 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 140 34 150 147 7 18 2 10 19 1 26 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 505 123 539 530 25 66 6 35 67 5 93 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 9 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 3.10 2.70 6.00 9.00 7.10 3.80 0.00 4.30 8.70 0.00 7.70 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 496 123 539 522 24 65 6 35 67 5 93 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes No Yes No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 24 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 25 45 0 25 45 0 0 35 0 0 15 0
Minimum Green [s] 8 10 0 9 10 0 0 9 0 0 8 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 4 0 0 3 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.87 173.86 78.80 194.91 132.71 130.82 44.44 27.64 48.92 36.91 34.45 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.51 6.95 3.15 7.80 5.31 5.23 1.78 1.11 1.96 1.48 1.38 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 7.15 96.59 43.78 109.21 73.73 72.68 24.69 15.35 27.18 20.51 19.14 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.29 3.86 1.75 4.37 2.95 2.91 0.99 0.61 1.09 0.82 0.77 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS C C C C B B C C C C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 34.38 24.06 21.89 26.15 13.36 13.37 24.46 24.01 27.65 27.16 27.22 X, volume / capacity 0.28 0.67 0.37 0.79 0.41 0.41 0.25 0.17 0.35 0.28 0.28 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.73 0.94 0.60 1.85 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.29 0.97 0.73 0.80 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 31.65 23.12 21.29 24.29 13.02 13.02 24.04 23.72 26.68 26.43 26.42 c, Capacity [veh/h] 56 837 373 761 765 753 298 272 213 204 188 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1810 3529 1575 3348 1765 1737 1755 1604 1685 1613 1488 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.03 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.43 0.43 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.13 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 16 16 15 29 29 11 11 8 8 8 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67
Lane Group L C R L C C L C L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.38 24.06 21.89 26.15 13.37 13.37 24.46 24.01 24.01 27.65 27.16 27.19 Movement LOS C C C C B B C C C C C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 23.87 19.66 24.28 27.38
Approach LOS C B C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.89
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.516
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 -4.7 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 23.27 38.22 23.27 23.27
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.666 2.869 1.979 2.464 Crosswalk LOS B C A B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1349 1349 1049 450 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 3.53 3.53 7.54 20.09
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.149 2.563 1.756 1.862 Bicycle LOS B B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 3: 3 Existing AM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: H:\...\Existing PM_PP.pdf 8/8/2022
Vistro File: H:\...\25628.5_ConcordInfinity_20220805.vistro Scenario 4 Existing PM Plus Project Infinity Concord
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
WB Right 0.722 38.3 D
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Panoramic Drive 6 NB Left 0.729 17.0 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway & SR 4WB Ramp 5 EB Right 0.784 39.1 D
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Arnold Industrial Way 4 WB Right 0.792 39.2 D
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Port Chicago Highway &Bates Avenue 3 EB Right 0.095 9.7 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway South 2 EB Left 0.002 10.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Port Chicago Highway &Project Driveway North 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.002
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway North Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 135 163 0 1 26
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 34 41 0 0 6
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 18 120 145 0 1 23
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 16 0 0 0 0 18
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 1.80 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 2 120 145 0 1 5
Name Port Chicago Highway Port CHicago Highway Project Driveway North Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.16
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.97 0.00 9.26
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 2.40 2.40 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.68 9.21 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.095
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Port Chicago Highway & Project Driveway South Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 59 157 191 0 0 81
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 15 39 48 0 0 20
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 52 138 168 0 0 71
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 47 16 18 0 0 53
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 1.70 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 122 150 0 0 18
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Project Driveway South Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.53
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.09 0.00 9.67
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.54 2.54 0.00 0.00 7.85 7.85 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.23 9.67 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.792
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 39.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Port Chicago Highway & Bates Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 35.00 35.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 220 207 0 0 274 10 17 0 701 0 0 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 55 52 0 0 68 2 4 0 175 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 0.8400 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 185 174 0 0 230 8 14 0 589 0 0 1 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 62 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 33.90 5.80 0.00 0.00 1.90 25.00 14.30 0.00 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 185 112 0 0 160 8 14 0 589 0 0 1 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Bates Avenue Bates Avneue Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall Yes Yes No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.5 3.5 0.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No Yes
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.5 4.5 0.0 3.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 45 50 0 25 50 0 0 45 0 0 45 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 12 0 6 12 0 0 6 0 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with