95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 107.61 150.71 0.00 259.43 7.92 585.06 1.90 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.30 6.03 0.00 10.38 0.32 23.40 0.08 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 59.78 83.73 0.00 156.76 4.40 417.51 1.05 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.39 3.35 0.00 6.27 0.18 16.70 0.04 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
Lane Group LOS D C A D B D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 42.51 25.53 0.00 41.94 12.67 41.73 53.37 X, volume / capacity 0.75 0.38 0.00 0.82 0.02 0.95 0.12 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 3.83 0.62 0.00 6.72 0.01 19.03 8.75 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.39 0.15 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 38.67 24.90 0.00 35.22 12.66 22.71 44.62 c, Capacity [veh/h] 294 544 0 346 855 740 8
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 2573 1813 1810 1860 1810 1565 1615 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.11 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.45 0.00 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.11 0.30 0.00 0.19 0.47 0.47 0.01 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 10 27 0 17 43 43 0
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.50 3.50 2.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.50 5.50 4.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Lane Group L C L C C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 42.51 25.53 25.53 0.00 41.94 41.94 12.67 12.67 41.73 53.37 53.37 53.37 Movement LOS D C C A D D B B D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 34.27 41.94 41.04 53.37
Approach LOS C D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 39.21
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.792
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 14.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 11933.24 9798.82 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 32.08 34.66 34.66
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.185 2.400 1.715 Crosswalk LOS F B B A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1111 1111 1000 1000 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 8.88 8.88 11.24 11.24
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection -0.737 0.742 2.744 1.561 Bicycle LOS A A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.784
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 39.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Port Chicago Highway & Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 120.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 98 393 1384 14 51 541
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 98 346 3 13 135
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 0.8700 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 85 342 1204 12 44 471
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 46 67 3 16 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 33.90 17.60 3.60 18.20 9.30 2.40 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 85 296 1137 9 28 471
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Arnold Industrial Way Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 29
Pedestrian Walk [s] 5
Pedestrian Signal Group 4
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.5 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 10 20 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 0 4 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 40 40 40 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 6 10 10 0 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 6 0 3 0
Control Type Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 73.55 35.08 221.43 222.82 25.01 718.58 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.94 1.40 8.86 8.91 1.00 28.74 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 40.86 19.49 128.48 129.50 13.89 478.69 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.63 0.78 5.14 5.18 0.56 19.15 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS D A B B B F
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 36.30 8.34 17.71 18.00 17.60 119.10 X, volume / capacity 0.83 0.17 0.67 0.64 0.10 1.16
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.72 0.05 0.80 1.35 0.03 95.00 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.49
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 30.58 8.30 16.91 16.66 17.57 24.10 c, Capacity [veh/h] 118 2357 1393 728 492 465
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1325 4456 3515 1836 1677 1584 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.25 0.03 0.34 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.09 0.53 0.40 0.40 0.29 0.29
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 6 36 27 27 20 20
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.50 3.50 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.50 5.50 C, Cycle Length [s] 68 68 68 68 68 68
Lane Group L C C C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 36.30 8.34 17.81 18.00 17.60 119.10 Movement LOS D A B B B F
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.92 17.81 110.35
Approach LOS B B F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 39.12
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.784
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 3841.61 4912.60 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 25.64 25.64
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.889 2.156 Crosswalk LOS F C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1175 1175 587 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 5.80 5.80 16.99
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.830 2.329 0.273 Bicycle LOS A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.729
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 17.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: Port Chicago Highway & SR 4 WB Ramp
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 49.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 265.00 100.00 265.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 334 328 0 0 1174 798 0 0 0 173 2 185 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 84 82 0 0 293 199 0 0 0 43 1 46 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 0.8800 1.0000 1.0000 0.8800 0.8800 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.8800 0.8800 0.8800 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 294 289 0 0 1033 702 0 0 0 152 2 163 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 36 0 0 37 30 0 0 0 0 0 10 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 27.00 20.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.40 0.00 19.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 294 253 0 0 996 672 0 0 0 152 2 153 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway SR 4 WB Ramps Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 15 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
Minimum Green [s] 4 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Permis Permis Permis Permis Permis Unsign Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 9.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 227.88 6.00 236.22 54.23 54.79 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 9.12 0.24 9.45 2.17 2.19 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 133.23 3.33 139.40 30.13 30.44 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 5.33 0.13 5.58 1.21 1.22 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS C A B C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 34.08 1.64 14.73 28.55 28.51 X, volume / capacity 0.85 0.14 0.77 0.57 0.57
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 14.49 0.03 0.85 3.39 3.35
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 19.60 1.62 13.89 25.16 25.16
c, Capacity [veh/h] 392 2361 1524 152 153
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1424 3046 3546 1790 1811 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.23 0.11 0.33 0.05 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.28 0.78 0.43 0.08 0.08
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 16 44 25 5 5
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 57 57 57 57 57
Lane Group L C C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.08 1.64 0.00 0.00 14.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.53 28.51 0.00 Movement LOS C A B C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 18.01 14.73 0.00 28.53
Approach LOS B B A C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 17.01
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.729
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 12.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 17.78 18.58 18.58
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.670 1.725 1.972 Crosswalk LOS F B A A
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1122 1122 0 701 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 5.49 5.49 28.51 12.02
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.106 2.528 4.132 1.848 Bicycle LOS B B D A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.722
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 38.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Port Chicago Highway & Panoramic Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 150.00 100.00 240.00 385.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Intersection Setup
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 1
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor street [ 0 0 0 0 v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing minor stree 0 0 0 0 v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major street [ 0 0 0 0 v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing major stree 0 0 0 0 Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 27 839 48 112 636 210 238 6 22 131 6 636 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 210 12 28 159 53 60 1 6 33 1 159 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 24 747 43 100 566 187 212 5 20 117 5 566 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 26 0 0 21 6 7 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 0.00 3.30 7.70 1.60 1.70 0.00 6.30 0.00 4.80 3.70 0.00 1.70 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 24 721 43 100 545 181 205 5 20 117 5 566 Name Port Chicago Highway Port Chicago Highway Panoramic Drive Panoramic Drive Volumes
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No Yes No Yes No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 24 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 25 45 0 25 45 0 0 35 0 0 15 0
Minimum Green [s] 8 10 0 9 10 0 0 9 0 0 8 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 4 0 0 3 0
Control Type Protect Permis Permis Protect Permis Permis Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Free Running
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 24.40 281.23 27.88 44.33 267.79 250.17 196.38 19.53 95.49 392.56 388.84 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.98 11.25 1.12 1.77 10.71 10.01 7.86 0.78 3.82 15.70 15.55 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 13.56 173.28 15.49 24.63 163.08 149.80 110.27 10.85 53.05 258.20 255.09 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.54 6.93 0.62 0.99 6.52 5.99 4.41 0.43 2.12 10.33 10.20 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D C B C C C C C C F F
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 38.54 26.11 19.65 33.00 21.76 21.86 33.68 26.62 27.85 82.46 83.08 X, volume / capacity 0.32 0.78 0.10 0.31 0.65 0.65 0.74 0.09 0.37 1.01 1.01 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.24 1.25 0.10 0.47 1.03 1.12 3.45 0.13 0.66 51.02 51.75 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.45 0.45 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 36.31 24.86 19.56 32.52 20.73 20.73 30.23 26.49 27.19 31.44 31.34 c, Capacity [veh/h] 83 1077 463 364 684 627 320 308 351 319 314 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1810 3523 1515 3470 1874 1717 1719 1660 1757 1599 1572 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.24 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.02 0.07 0.20 0.20 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 4 24 24 8 29 29 15 15 16 16 16 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78
Lane Group L C R L C C L C L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 38.54 26.11 19.65 33.00 21.79 21.86 33.68 26.62 26.62 27.85 82.46 82.77 Movement LOS D C B C C C C C C C F F
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.14 23.12 32.94 73.46
Approach LOS C C C E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 38.33
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.722
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 -4.7 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 28.98 44.05 28.98 28.98
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.722 2.975 2.098 2.475 Crosswalk LOS B C B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 1148 1148 893 383 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 7.12 7.12 12.02 25.65
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.314 2.350 1.999 2.835 Bicycle LOS B B A C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Infinity Concord Scenario 4: 4 Existing PM Plus Project Version 2022 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
1 Hart, Michael
From: Robert Speller <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 3:11 PM
To: Hart, Michael
Subject: Clyde Resident
“EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.”
No to cannabis businesses in our city!
It just promotes another way for drivers to drive around hi......in our community! ATTACHMENT 5
Infinity Assets Concord LLC
dba “Cookies”
Cannabis Storefront Retail
Michael Hart, Associate Planner
City Council
April 11, 2023 Page 274 of 294
Summary
• Background
• Project Location and Summary
• Planning Commission Meeting
• Administrative Permit
• Minor Exception
• Design and Site Review
• Development Agreement
• Environmental Review/CEQA
• Recommendation
2
Background
• May 26, 2020: Council adopted cannabis ordinance.
• July 28, 2020: Council approved the competitive selection process. • October 5, 2020: Request for Proposals (RFP) issued; 4 microbusiness with storefront retail proposals received. • April 13, 2021: Council interviewed microbusiness applicants, selecting Infinity Assets as one of two applicants to continue through the licensing and land use process.
3
Background
• February 21, 2022: Infinity submitted applications.
• June 7, 2022: Infinity submitted revised plans for their proposed tenant space.
• July 29, 2022: Infinity’s application is deemed complete. • January 26, 2023: Design Review Board reviewed project, recommends approval subject to conditions.
• March 1, 2023: Planning Commission reviewed project, recommends approval.
4
Location
5 Address: 5121 Port Chicago Hwy
APN: 159-040-037
General Plan: Business Park
(BP)
Zoning: Industrial Business Park
(IBP)
Project Summary
• Occupy approximately 12,000 square feet of an approximately 39,000 square foot building spit across two parcels.
• Cannabis Microbusiness consisting of the following
components: Storefront Retail (2,109 sq. ft.), cultivation (6,713 sq. ft.), distribution and retail delivery (596 sq. ft.). • Operate daily between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
• Improvements to the exterior of the building/site, including new materials and paint, architectural elements, and landscaping 6
Project Summary – Continued
• Approvals required for the project:
• Minor Exception: Excessive parking
• Administrative Permit: Land use
• Design and Site Review: Building and site improvements • Development Agreement
• Project will employ 43 full-time staff primarily hired from the Concord Community
7
Minor Exception
Project proposes
44 parking spaces
where a maximum
of 42 parking
spaces are allowed.
8
Minor Exception
• Minor Exception to authorize excess parking subject to findings.
• New ADA path of travel
• Applicant to upgrade landscaping and provide landscape strips with shade trees.
• Providing new parking lot lighting for visibility and safety. 9
Administrative Permit
Conditions of Approval
• Land use authorized (type of use and scale)
• Hours of operation
• Standards applicable to cannabis operations generally (Security, odor control and waste management)
• Standards for specific cannabis operations (cultivation, distribution, delivery and storefront retail).
10
Design and Site Review
Project proposes modifications and upgrades to the exterior of the building and the site.
Architecture
• New materials, paint, and pop-out element along front elevation 11
Design and Site Review
Landscaping
• New landscaping around
parking lot and project
frontage.
• New landscape strips with
shade trees.
12
Design and Site Review
Other Improvements
• New black metal fencing along rear property line and gate • New trash enclosure
• New lighting along building and in parking lot
13
Development Agreement
• Term: Five years, automatic two-year extension;
discretionary five-year extension.
• Annual Developer Contributions:
• One Percent of Gross Revenues; or $20,000 (whichever is greater) to Cannabis Community Benefit Fund.
• Five Percent of Gross Revenues towards General Fund.
• Volunteer Hours:
• Four volunteer hours per on-site employee and business owner 14
Development Agreement – Continued
• Labor and Social Diversity:
• Labor Peace Agreement with Teamsters Joint Councils #7 and #42. • Prioritize hiring of local and diverse employees.
• Recruitment, hiring, and development for underrepresented individuals in Concord.
• Support for underrepresented individuals by purchasing products/services from diverse local businesses.
• Provide a livable wage (minimum $19/hour, or $39,520 for salaried).
15
Development Agreement – Continued
• Neighborhood Compatibility:
• Adhere to the Neighborhood Compatibility Plan submitted as part of RFP response.
• Includes complaint mitigation, community engagement, and partnership with existing Concord businesses.
• Designate a Community Relations Officer to address and mitigate complaints from the public, customers, and businesses.
16
Development Agreement –Applicable Laws
• Provides vested rights to the applicant for land use
regulations and City cannabis rules.
• Any new laws restricting the sale of cannabis accessories or prohibiting the operation of cannabis businesses would not apply to this business.
17
Development Agreement Findings
• Consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the general plan.
• Complies with the OBP Zoning District.
• Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City.
• Will not adversely affect the development of property or the preservations of property values.
18
Environmental/CEQA
Proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the following CEQA Guidelines:
• Section 15301 (“Existing Facilities”);
• Section 15302 (“Replacement or Reconstruction”);
• Section 15303 (“New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”);
• Section 15304 (“Minor Alterations to Land”); and
• Section 15305 (“Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations”).
No further environmental review is required
19
Recommended Action
1. Adopt a resolution approving an Administrative Permit, Minor Exception, and Design and Site Review; and
2. Introduce an ordinance approving and adopting a Development Agreement for a cannabis microbusiness with storefront retail component located at 5121 Port Chicago Highway.
20
Questions?
21