Agenda packet — Corona City Council, October 16, 2024 (part 5 of 7)

BUILDING DIVISION - Table F: Tenant Improvements
Service
Name
Dollar
Change
Dollar
Change
Non-Structural Review
Percentage of New Construction
Structural Review
Percentage of New Construction
30%
50%
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Inspection
Only
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Inspection
Only
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Inspection
Only

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
E Educational 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,162.82 376.54 2,631.43 453.81 545.88 3,604.71 627.56 4,385.72 756.36 909.80 E Educational 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,802.35 313.78 2,192.86 378.18 454.90 3,003.92 522.97 3,654.76 630.30 758.17 E Educational 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,441.88 251.02 1,754.29 302.54 363.92 2,403.14 418.37 2,923.81 504.24 606.54 E Educational 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,244.24 800.14 3,947.14 964.35 867.12 5,407.06 1,333.57 6,578.57 1,607.25 1,445.20 E Educational 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,703.53 666.78 3,289.29 803.63 722.60 4,505.88 1,111.31 5,482.14 1,339.38 1,204.33 E Educational 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,162.82 533.43 2,631.43 642.90 578.08 3,604.71 889.05 4,385.72 1,071.50 963.47 E Educational 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,388.42 1,412.01 4,122.57 1,701.80 1,023.93 5,647.37 2,353.35 6,870.95 2,836.33 1,706.56 E Educational 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,823.69 1,176.68 3,435.48 1,418.17 853.28 4,706.14 1,961.13 5,725.79 2,363.61 1,422.13 E Educational 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,258.95 941.34 2,748.38 1,134.53 682.62 3,764.92 1,568.90 4,580.64 1,890.89 1,137.71 E Educational 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,037.27 2,023.88 4,912.00 2,439.25 1,290.09 6,728.79 3,373.14 8,186.67 4,065.41 2,150.15 E Educational 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,364.39 1,686.57 4,093.33 2,032.70 1,075.08 5,607.32 2,810.95 6,822.22 3,387.84 1,791.79 E Educational 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,691.51 1,349.26 3,274.67 1,626.16 860.06 4,485.86 2,248.76 5,457.78 2,710.27 1,433.43 E Educational 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,118.68 2,400.42 6,227.72 2,893.06 1,601.67 8,531.14 4,000.70 10,379.53 4,821.76 2,669.45 E Educational 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,265.57 2,000.35 5,189.76 2,410.88 1,334.72 7,109.28 3,333.92 8,649.60 4,018.14 2,224.54 E Educational 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,412.46 1,600.28 4,151.81 1,928.71 1,067.78 5,687.43 2,667.14 6,919.68 3,214.51 1,779.63 E Educational 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 7,137.32 3,106.43 8,683.72 3,743.96 2,183.93 11,895.53 5,177.38 14,472.86 6,239.93 3,639.88 E Educational 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,947.77 2,588.69 7,236.43 3,119.97 1,819.94 9,912.94 4,314.48 12,060.72 5,199.94 3,033.23 E Educational 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,758.21 2,070.95 5,789.14 2,495.97 1,455.95 7,930.35 3,451.59 9,648.57 4,159.95 2,426.59 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,874.45 376.54 2,280.57 453.81 483.40 3,124.08 627.56 3,800.95 756.36 805.67 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,562.04 313.78 1,900.48 378.18 402.83 2,603.40 522.97 3,167.46 630.30 671.39 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,249.63 251.02 1,520.38 302.54 322.27 2,082.72 418.37 2,533.97 504.24 537.11 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,811.67 800.14 3,420.86 964.35 773.40 4,686.12 1,333.57 5,701.43 1,607.25 1,289.00 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,343.06 666.78 2,850.71 803.63 644.50 3,905.10 1,111.31 4,751.19 1,339.38 1,074.17 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,874.45 533.43 2,280.57 642.90 515.60 3,124.08 889.05 3,800.95 1,071.50 859.33 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 15,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,955.86 1,412.01 3,596.29 1,701.80 930.21 4,926.43 2,353.35 5,993.81 2,836.33 1,550.36 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 15,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,463.22 1,176.68 2,996.91 1,418.17 775.18 4,105.36 1,961.13 4,994.84 2,363.61 1,291.96 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 15,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,970.57 941.34 2,397.52 1,134.53 620.14 3,284.29 1,568.90 3,995.87 1,890.89 1,033.57 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,460.52 1,741.48 4,210.29 2,098.89 1,107.17 5,767.53 2,902.47 7,017.14 3,498.14 1,845.29 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,883.77 1,451.24 3,508.57 1,749.07 922.64 4,806.28 2,418.73 5,847.62 2,915.12 1,537.74 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,307.01 1,160.99 2,806.86 1,399.26 738.11 3,845.02 1,934.98 4,678.10 2,332.10 1,230.19 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,109.37 2,023.88 4,999.72 2,439.25 1,305.71 6,848.94 3,373.14 8,332.86 4,065.41 2,176.18 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,424.47 1,686.57 4,166.43 2,032.70 1,088.09 5,707.45 2,810.95 6,944.05 3,387.84 1,813.49 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,739.58 1,349.26 3,333.14 1,626.16 870.47 4,565.96 2,248.76 5,555.24 2,710.27 1,450.79 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,325.65 2,682.82 5,262.86 3,233.42 1,487.80 7,209.41 4,471.37 8,771.43 5,389.03 2,479.67 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,604.71 2,235.69 4,385.72 2,694.52 1,239.84 6,007.84 3,726.14 7,309.53 4,490.86 2,066.40 F-1, F-2 Industrial, Moderate/Low Hazard 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,883.77 1,788.55 3,508.57 2,155.61 991.87 4,806.28 2,980.92 5,847.62 3,592.69 1,653.12 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,441.88 1,176.68 1,754.29 1,418.17 553.89 2,403.14 1,961.13 2,923.81 2,363.61 923.15 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,201.57 980.56 1,461.91 1,181.80 461.58 2,002.61 1,634.27 2,436.51 1,969.67 769.29 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 961.26 784.45 1,169.52 945.44 369.26 1,602.09 1,307.42 1,949.21 1,575.74 615.44 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,162.82 1,553.21 2,631.43 1,871.98 787.37 3,604.71 2,588.69 4,385.72 3,119.97 1,312.28 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,802.35 1,294.35 2,192.86 1,559.98 656.14 3,003.92 2,157.24 3,654.76 2,599.97 1,093.57 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,441.88 1,035.48 1,754.29 1,247.99 524.91 2,403.14 1,725.79 2,923.81 2,079.98 874.86 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,379.11 1,976.82 2,894.57 2,382.52 921.17 3,965.18 3,294.70 4,824.29 3,970.86 1,535.28 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,982.59 1,647.35 2,412.14 1,985.43 767.64 3,304.31 2,745.58 4,020.24 3,309.05 1,279.40 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,586.07 1,317.88 1,929.71 1,588.35 614.11 2,643.45 2,196.46 3,216.19 2,647.24 1,023.52 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,595.39 2,588.69 3,157.71 3,119.97 1,093.60 4,325.65 4,314.48 5,262.86 5,199.94 1,822.67 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,162.82 2,157.24 2,631.43 2,599.97 911.33 3,604.71 3,595.40 4,385.72 4,333.28 1,518.89 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,730.26 1,725.79 2,105.14 2,079.98 729.07 2,883.77 2,876.32 3,508.57 3,466.63 1,215.11 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 77 of 91

Page 524 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,244.24 3,341.76 3,947.14 4,027.59 1,388.74 5,407.06 5,569.61 6,578.57 6,712.65 2,314.56 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,703.53 2,784.80 3,289.29 3,356.33 1,157.28 4,505.88 4,641.34 5,482.14 5,593.88 1,928.80 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,162.82 2,227.84 2,631.43 2,685.06 925.82 3,604.71 3,713.07 4,385.72 4,475.10 1,543.04 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 100,000 s.f., I-A, I-B, II-A 4,686.12 4,377.24 5,701.43 5,275.58 1,913.65 7,810.20 7,295.40 9,502.38 8,792.63 3,189.42 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 100,000 s.f., II-B, III-A, V-A 3,905.10 3,647.70 4,751.19 4,396.31 1,594.71 6,508.50 6,079.50 7,918.65 7,327.19 2,657.85 S-1, S-2 Low/Mod Hazard Storage 100,000 s.f., III-B, IV, V-B 3,124.08 2,918.16 3,800.95 3,517.05 1,275.77 5,206.80 4,863.60 6,334.92 5,861.75 2,126.28 S-2 Parking Garage 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,307.01 1,412.01 2,806.86 1,701.80 789.63 3,845.02 2,353.35 4,678.10 2,836.33 1,316.05 S-2 Parking Garage 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,922.51 1,176.68 2,339.05 1,418.17 658.03 3,204.18 1,961.13 3,898.41 2,363.61 1,096.71 S-2 Parking Garage 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,538.01 941.34 1,871.24 1,134.53 526.42 2,563.35 1,568.90 3,118.73 1,890.89 877.37 S-2 Parking Garage 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,532.61 1,835.62 4,298.00 2,212.34 1,142.11 5,887.69 3,059.36 7,163.33 3,687.23 1,903.52 S-2 Parking Garage 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,943.84 1,529.68 3,581.67 1,843.62 951.76 4,906.41 2,549.47 5,969.45 3,072.69 1,586.27 S-2 Parking Garage 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,355.07 1,223.74 2,865.33 1,474.89 761.41 3,925.12 2,039.57 4,775.56 2,458.15 1,269.01 S-2 Parking Garage 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,676.80 2,400.42 4,473.43 2,893.06 1,289.27 6,128.00 4,000.70 7,455.72 4,821.76 2,148.78 S-2 Parking Garage 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,064.00 2,000.35 3,727.86 2,410.88 1,074.39 5,106.67 3,333.92 6,213.10 4,018.14 1,790.65 S-2 Parking Garage 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,451.20 1,600.28 2,982.29 1,928.71 859.51 4,085.33 2,667.14 4,970.48 3,214.51 1,432.52 S-2 Parking Garage 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,695.44 3,577.10 6,929.43 4,311.22 1,968.12 9,492.39 5,961.83 11,549.05 7,185.37 3,280.20 S-2 Parking Garage 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,746.20 2,980.92 5,774.52 3,592.69 1,640.10 7,910.33 4,968.19 9,624.21 5,987.81 2,733.50 S-2 Parking Garage 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,796.96 2,384.73 4,619.62 2,874.15 1,312.08 6,328.26 3,974.55 7,699.37 4,790.25 2,186.80 S-2 Parking Garage 500,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,921.04 5,365.65 8,420.57 6,466.84 2,600.73 11,535.06 8,942.75 14,034.29 10,778.06 4,334.54 S-2 Parking Garage 500,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,767.53 4,471.37 7,017.14 5,389.03 2,167.27 9,612.55 7,452.29 11,695.24 8,981.72 3,612.12 S-2 Parking Garage 500,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,614.02 3,577.10 5,613.72 4,311.22 1,733.82 7,690.04 5,961.83 9,356.19 7,185.37 2,889.70 S-2 Parking Garage 1,000,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 9,083.86 10,731.30 11,052.00 12,933.67 4,170.52 15,139.77 17,885.49 18,420.00 21,556.12 6,950.87 S-2 Parking Garage 1,000,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 7,569.88 8,942.75 9,210.00 10,778.06 3,475.43 12,616.47 14,904.58 15,350.00 17,963.44 5,792.39 S-2 Parking Garage 1,000,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 6,055.91 7,154.20 7,368.00 8,622.45 2,780.35 10,093.18 11,923.66 12,280.00 14,370.75 4,633.91 U Utility/Misc 500 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 720.94 423.60 877.14 510.54 243.14 1,201.57 706.01 1,461.91 850.90 405.23 U Utility/Misc 500 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 600.78 353.00 730.95 425.45 202.61 1,001.31 588.34 1,218.25 709.08 337.69 U Utility/Misc 500 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 480.63 282.40 584.76 340.36 162.09 801.05 470.67 974.60 567.27 270.15 U Utility/Misc 2,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,081.41 611.87 1,315.71 737.45 359.88 1,802.35 1,019.79 2,192.86 1,229.08 599.79 U Utility/Misc 2,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 901.18 509.89 1,096.43 614.54 299.90 1,501.96 849.82 1,827.38 1,024.23 499.83 U Utility/Misc 2,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 720.94 407.91 877.14 491.63 239.92 1,201.57 679.86 1,461.91 819.38 399.86 U Utility/Misc 4,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,225.60 1,270.81 1,491.14 1,531.62 526.35 2,042.67 2,118.02 2,485.24 2,552.70 877.25 U Utility/Misc 4,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,021.33 1,059.01 1,242.62 1,276.35 438.63 1,702.22 1,765.02 2,071.03 2,127.25 731.04 U Utility/Misc 4,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 817.07 847.21 994.10 1,021.08 350.90 1,361.78 1,412.01 1,656.83 1,701.80 584.83 U Utility/Misc 8,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,441.88 1,647.35 1,754.29 1,985.43 650.49 2,403.14 2,745.58 2,923.81 3,309.05 1,084.15 U Utility/Misc 8,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,201.57 1,372.79 1,461.91 1,654.53 542.07 2,002.61 2,287.98 2,436.51 2,757.54 903.46 U Utility/Misc 8,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 961.26 1,098.23 1,169.52 1,323.62 433.66 1,602.09 1,830.39 1,949.21 2,206.04 722.76 U Utility/Misc 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,802.35 2,070.95 2,192.86 2,495.97 815.52 3,003.92 3,451.59 3,654.76 4,159.95 1,359.21 U Utility/Misc 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,501.96 1,725.79 1,827.38 2,079.98 679.60 2,503.27 2,876.32 3,045.64 3,466.63 1,132.67 U Utility/Misc 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,201.57 1,380.63 1,461.91 1,663.98 543.68 2,002.61 2,301.06 2,436.51 2,773.30 906.14 U Utility/Misc 40,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,739.58 2,494.56 3,333.14 3,006.51 1,105.52 4,565.96 4,157.59 5,555.24 5,010.85 1,842.54 U Utility/Misc 40,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,282.98 2,078.80 2,777.62 2,505.43 921.27 3,804.97 3,464.66 4,629.37 4,175.71 1,535.45 U Utility/Misc 40,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,826.38 1,663.04 2,222.10 2,004.34 737.02 3,043.97 2,771.73 3,703.49 3,340.57 1,228.36 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 500 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 288.38 188.27 350.86 226.91 101.12 480.63 313.78 584.76 378.18 168.53 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 500 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 240.31 156.89 292.38 189.09 84.27 400.52 261.48 487.30 315.15 140.44 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 500 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 192.25 125.51 233.90 151.27 67.41 320.42 209.19 389.84 252.12 112.35 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 2,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 432.56 282.40 526.29 340.36 151.68 720.94 470.67 877.14 567.27 252.80 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 2,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 360.47 235.34 438.57 283.63 126.40 600.78 392.23 730.95 472.72 210.66 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 2,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 288.38 188.27 350.86 226.91 101.12 480.63 313.78 584.76 378.18 168.53 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 78 of 91

Page 525 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 4,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 504.66 564.81 614.00 680.72 225.26 841.10 941.34 1,023.33 1,134.53 375.43 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 4,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 420.55 470.67 511.67 567.27 187.71 700.92 784.45 852.78 945.44 312.86 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 4,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 336.44 376.54 409.33 453.81 150.17 560.73 627.56 682.22 756.36 250.28 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 8,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 576.75 753.07 701.71 907.63 279.51 961.26 1,255.12 1,169.52 1,512.71 465.86 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 8,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 480.63 627.56 584.76 756.36 232.93 801.05 1,045.94 974.60 1,260.59 388.21 U Utility/Misc (Associated w R-3 structures) 8,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 384.50 502.05 467.81 605.08 186.34 640.84 836.75 779.68 1,008.47 310.57 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,162.82 470.67 2,631.43 567.27 565.20 3,604.71 784.45 4,385.72 945.44 942.00 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,802.35 392.23 2,192.86 472.72 471.00 3,003.92 653.71 3,654.76 787.87 785.00 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,441.88 313.78 1,754.29 378.18 376.80 2,403.14 522.97 2,923.81 630.30 628.00 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,244.24 941.34 3,947.14 1,134.53 896.10 5,407.06 1,568.90 6,578.57 1,890.89 1,493.50 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,703.53 784.45 3,289.29 945.44 746.75 4,505.88 1,307.42 5,482.14 1,575.74 1,244.58 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,162.82 627.56 2,631.43 756.36 597.40 3,604.71 1,045.94 4,385.72 1,260.59 995.67 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,388.42 1,553.21 4,122.57 1,871.98 1,052.91 5,647.37 2,588.69 6,870.95 3,119.97 1,754.86 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,823.69 1,294.35 3,435.48 1,559.98 877.43 4,706.14 2,157.24 5,725.79 2,599.97 1,462.38 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,258.95 1,035.48 2,748.38 1,247.99 701.94 3,764.92 1,725.79 4,580.64 2,079.98 1,169.90 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,974.49 2,729.89 6,052.29 3,290.15 1,638.05 8,290.82 4,549.82 10,087.14 5,483.58 2,730.08 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,145.41 2,274.91 5,043.57 2,741.79 1,365.04 6,909.02 3,791.52 8,405.95 4,569.65 2,275.06 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,316.33 1,819.93 4,034.86 2,193.43 1,092.03 5,527.22 3,033.21 6,724.76 3,655.72 1,820.05 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,776.85 3,530.03 8,245.14 4,254.50 2,192.76 11,294.75 5,883.39 13,741.91 7,090.83 3,654.60 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,647.37 2,941.69 6,870.95 3,545.41 1,827.30 9,412.29 4,902.82 11,451.59 5,909.02 3,045.50 H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 High Hazards/Explosives 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,517.90 2,353.35 5,496.76 2,836.33 1,461.84 7,529.83 3,922.26 9,161.27 4,727.22 2,436.40 H-5 HPM, 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,172.14 376.54 3,859.43 453.81 764.56 5,286.90 627.56 6,432.38 756.36 1,274.27 H-5 HPM, 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,643.45 313.78 3,216.19 378.18 637.14 4,405.75 522.97 5,360.32 630.30 1,061.89 H-5 HPM, 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,114.76 251.02 2,572.95 302.54 509.71 3,524.60 418.37 4,288.25 504.24 849.52 H-5 HPM, 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,902.40 800.14 5,964.57 964.35 1,226.38 8,170.67 1,333.57 9,940.95 1,607.25 2,043.97 H-5 HPM, 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,085.33 666.78 4,970.48 803.63 1,021.99 6,808.89 1,111.31 8,284.13 1,339.38 1,703.31 H-5 HPM, 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,268.27 533.43 3,976.38 642.90 817.59 5,447.11 889.05 6,627.30 1,071.50 1,362.65 H-5 HPM, 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,118.68 1,364.95 6,227.72 1,645.07 1,389.16 8,531.14 2,274.91 10,379.53 2,741.79 2,315.27 H-5 HPM, 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,265.57 1,137.45 5,189.76 1,370.89 1,157.63 7,109.28 1,895.76 8,649.60 2,284.82 1,929.39 H-5 HPM, 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,412.46 909.96 4,151.81 1,096.72 926.11 5,687.43 1,516.61 6,919.68 1,827.86 1,543.51 H-5 HPM, 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,055.91 1,976.82 7,368.00 2,382.52 1,717.80 10,093.18 3,294.70 12,280.00 3,970.86 2,862.99 H-5 HPM, 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,046.59 1,647.35 6,140.00 1,985.43 1,431.50 8,410.98 2,745.58 10,233.34 3,309.05 2,385.83 H-5 HPM, 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,037.27 1,317.88 4,912.00 1,588.35 1,145.20 6,728.79 2,196.46 8,186.67 2,647.24 1,908.66 H-5 HPM, 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 7,569.88 2,353.35 9,210.00 2,836.33 2,123.10 12,616.47 3,922.26 15,350.00 4,727.22 3,538.49 H-5 HPM, 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 6,308.24 1,961.13 7,675.00 2,363.61 1,769.25 10,513.73 3,268.55 12,791.67 3,939.35 2,948.74 H-5 HPM, 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 5,046.59 1,568.90 6,140.00 1,890.89 1,415.40 8,410.98 2,614.84 10,233.34 3,151.48 2,359.00 H-5 HPM, 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 10,742.02 3,059.36 13,069.43 3,687.23 2,955.28 17,903.37 5,098.93 21,782.39 6,145.39 4,925.46 H-5 HPM, 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 8,951.69 2,549.47 10,891.19 3,072.69 2,462.73 14,919.48 4,249.11 18,151.99 5,121.15 4,104.55 H-5 HPM, 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 7,161.35 2,039.57 8,712.95 2,458.15 1,970.18 11,935.58 3,399.29 14,521.59 4,096.92 3,283.64 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,955.86 517.74 3,596.29 623.99 746.68 4,926.43 862.90 5,993.81 1,039.99 1,244.47 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,463.22 431.45 2,996.91 519.99 622.24 4,105.36 719.08 4,994.84 866.66 1,037.06 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,970.57 345.16 2,397.52 416.00 497.79 3,284.29 575.26 3,995.87 693.33 829.65 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,758.21 1,035.48 5,789.14 1,247.99 1,243.44 7,930.35 1,725.79 9,648.57 2,079.98 2,072.40 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,965.18 862.90 4,824.29 1,039.99 1,036.20 6,608.63 1,438.16 8,040.48 1,733.31 1,727.00 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,172.14 690.32 3,859.43 831.99 828.96 5,286.90 1,150.53 6,432.38 1,386.65 1,381.60 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,902.40 1,835.62 5,964.57 2,212.34 1,438.89 8,170.67 3,059.36 9,940.95 3,687.23 2,398.16 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,085.33 1,529.68 4,970.48 1,843.62 1,199.08 6,808.89 2,549.47 8,284.13 3,072.69 1,998.46 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,268.27 1,223.74 3,976.38 1,474.89 959.26 5,447.11 2,039.57 6,627.30 2,458.15 1,598.77 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 79 of 91

Page 526 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,839.62 2,588.69 7,104.86 3,119.97 1,796.51 9,732.71 4,314.48 11,841.43 5,199.94 2,994.18 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,866.35 2,157.24 5,920.72 2,599.97 1,497.09 8,110.59 3,595.40 9,867.86 4,333.28 2,495.15 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,893.08 1,725.79 4,736.57 2,079.98 1,197.67 6,488.47 2,876.32 7,894.29 3,466.63 1,996.12 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 7,281.51 3,106.43 8,859.14 3,743.96 2,215.17 12,135.84 5,177.38 14,765.24 6,239.93 3,691.95 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 6,067.92 2,588.69 7,382.62 3,119.97 1,845.97 10,113.20 4,314.48 12,304.37 5,199.94 3,076.62 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,854.34 2,070.95 5,906.10 2,495.97 1,476.78 8,090.56 3,451.59 9,843.49 4,159.95 2,461.30 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 10,381.55 4,000.70 12,630.86 4,821.76 3,070.37 17,302.59 6,667.84 21,051.43 8,036.27 5,117.28 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 8,651.30 3,333.92 10,525.72 4,018.14 2,558.64 14,418.83 5,556.53 17,542.86 6,696.89 4,264.40 I-1, I-2, I-3 Institutional, Hospital, Jail 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 6,921.04 2,667.14 8,420.57 3,214.51 2,046.91 11,535.06 4,445.23 14,034.29 5,357.52 3,411.52 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,955.86 470.67 3,596.29 567.27 737.02 4,926.43 784.45 5,993.81 945.44 1,228.37 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,463.22 392.23 2,996.91 472.72 614.19 4,105.36 653.71 4,994.84 787.87 1,023.64 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,970.57 313.78 2,397.52 378.18 491.35 3,284.29 522.97 3,995.87 630.30 818.91 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,686.12 988.41 5,701.43 1,191.26 1,218.16 7,810.20 1,647.35 9,502.38 1,985.43 2,030.27 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,905.10 823.67 4,751.19 992.72 1,015.14 6,508.50 1,372.79 7,918.65 1,654.53 1,691.89 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,124.08 658.94 3,800.95 794.17 812.11 5,206.80 1,098.23 6,334.92 1,323.62 1,353.51 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,902.40 1,694.42 5,964.57 2,042.16 1,409.92 8,170.67 2,824.03 9,940.95 3,403.60 2,349.86 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,085.33 1,412.01 4,970.48 1,701.80 1,174.93 6,808.89 2,353.35 8,284.13 2,836.33 1,958.22 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,268.27 1,129.61 3,976.38 1,361.44 939.94 5,447.11 1,882.68 6,627.30 2,269.07 1,566.57 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,839.62 2,447.49 7,104.86 2,949.79 1,767.53 9,732.71 4,079.15 11,841.43 4,916.31 2,945.88 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,866.35 2,039.57 5,920.72 2,458.15 1,472.94 8,110.59 3,399.29 9,867.86 4,096.92 2,454.90 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,893.08 1,631.66 4,736.57 1,966.52 1,178.35 6,488.47 2,719.43 7,894.29 3,277.54 1,963.92 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 7,281.51 2,918.16 8,859.14 3,517.05 2,176.53 12,135.84 4,863.60 14,765.24 5,861.75 3,627.55 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 6,067.92 2,431.80 7,382.62 2,930.88 1,813.77 10,113.20 4,053.00 12,304.37 4,884.79 3,022.96 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,854.34 1,945.44 5,906.10 2,344.70 1,451.02 8,090.56 3,242.40 9,843.49 3,907.84 2,418.37 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 10,381.55 3,530.03 12,630.86 4,254.50 2,973.77 17,302.59 5,883.39 21,051.43 7,090.83 4,956.29 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 8,651.30 2,941.69 10,525.72 3,545.41 2,478.14 14,418.83 4,902.82 17,542.86 5,909.02 4,130.24 I-4, I-2.1 Day Care/Outpatient 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 6,921.04 2,353.35 8,420.57 2,836.33 1,982.51 11,535.06 3,922.26 14,034.29 4,727.22 3,304.19 M Mercantile 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,018.64 800.14 2,456.00 964.35 601.58 3,364.39 1,333.57 4,093.33 1,607.25 1,002.63 M Mercantile 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,682.20 666.78 2,046.67 803.63 501.31 2,803.66 1,111.31 3,411.11 1,339.38 835.52 M Mercantile 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,345.76 533.43 1,637.33 642.90 401.05 2,242.93 889.05 2,728.89 1,071.50 668.42 M Mercantile 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,100.05 1,223.74 3,771.72 1,474.89 922.82 5,166.75 2,039.57 6,286.19 2,458.15 1,538.03 M Mercantile 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,583.37 1,019.79 3,143.10 1,229.08 769.01 4,305.62 1,699.64 5,238.49 2,048.46 1,281.69 M Mercantile 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,066.70 815.83 2,514.48 983.26 615.21 3,444.50 1,359.72 4,190.79 1,638.77 1,025.35 M Mercantile 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,244.24 1,835.62 3,947.14 2,212.34 1,079.63 5,407.06 3,059.36 6,578.57 3,687.23 1,799.38 M Mercantile 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,703.53 1,529.68 3,289.29 1,843.62 899.69 4,505.88 2,549.47 5,482.14 3,072.69 1,499.49 M Mercantile 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,162.82 1,223.74 2,631.43 1,474.89 719.75 3,604.71 2,039.57 4,385.72 2,458.15 1,199.59 M Mercantile 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,820.99 2,776.96 4,648.86 3,346.87 1,397.78 6,368.31 4,628.26 7,748.10 5,578.12 2,329.64 M Mercantile 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,184.16 2,314.13 3,874.05 2,789.06 1,164.82 5,306.93 3,856.89 6,456.75 4,648.43 1,941.36 M Mercantile 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,547.33 1,851.31 3,099.24 2,231.25 931.86 4,245.54 3,085.51 5,165.40 3,718.75 1,553.09 M Mercantile 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,758.21 3,577.10 5,789.14 4,311.22 1,765.06 7,930.35 5,961.83 9,648.57 7,185.37 2,941.76 M Mercantile 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,965.18 2,980.92 4,824.29 3,592.69 1,470.88 6,608.63 4,968.19 8,040.48 5,987.81 2,451.47 M Mercantile 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,172.14 2,384.73 3,859.43 2,874.15 1,176.70 5,286.90 3,974.55 6,432.38 4,790.25 1,961.17 M Mercantile 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,407.06 4,612.57 6,578.57 5,559.21 2,118.15 9,011.77 7,687.62 10,964.29 9,265.35 3,530.25 M Mercantile 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,505.88 3,843.81 5,482.14 4,632.68 1,765.12 7,509.80 6,406.35 9,136.91 7,721.13 2,941.87 M Mercantile 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,604.71 3,075.05 4,385.72 3,706.14 1,412.10 6,007.84 5,125.08 7,309.53 6,176.90 2,353.50 M Mercantile 200,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,055.91 6,071.65 7,368.00 7,317.74 2,558.18 10,093.18 10,119.42 12,280.00 12,196.23 4,263.63 M Mercantile 200,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,046.59 5,059.71 6,140.00 6,098.11 2,131.81 8,410.98 8,432.85 10,233.34 10,163.52 3,553.02 M Mercantile 200,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,037.27 4,047.77 4,912.00 4,878.49 1,705.45 6,728.79 6,746.28 8,186.67 8,130.82 2,842.42 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 80 of 91

Page 527 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,523.29 894.27 3,070.00 1,077.81 730.24 4,205.49 1,490.46 5,116.67 1,796.34 1,217.06 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,102.75 745.23 2,558.33 898.17 608.53 3,504.58 1,242.05 4,263.89 1,496.95 1,014.22 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,682.20 596.18 2,046.67 718.54 486.83 2,803.66 993.64 3,411.11 1,197.56 811.38 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,893.08 1,694.42 4,736.57 2,042.16 1,191.23 6,488.47 2,824.03 7,894.29 3,403.60 1,985.39 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,244.24 1,412.01 3,947.14 1,701.80 992.69 5,407.06 2,353.35 6,578.57 2,836.33 1,654.49 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,595.39 1,129.61 3,157.71 1,361.44 794.16 4,325.65 1,882.68 5,262.86 2,269.07 1,323.59 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,037.27 2,824.03 4,912.00 3,403.60 1,454.30 6,728.79 4,706.71 8,186.67 5,672.66 2,423.84 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,364.39 2,353.35 4,093.33 2,836.33 1,211.92 5,607.32 3,922.26 6,822.22 4,727.22 2,019.87 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,691.51 1,882.68 3,274.67 2,269.07 969.54 4,485.86 3,137.81 5,457.78 3,781.78 1,615.89 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,758.21 3,953.64 5,789.14 4,765.04 1,842.33 7,930.35 6,589.39 9,648.57 7,941.73 3,070.56 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,965.18 3,294.70 4,824.29 3,970.86 1,535.28 6,608.63 5,491.16 8,040.48 6,618.11 2,558.80 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,172.14 2,635.76 3,859.43 3,176.69 1,228.22 5,286.90 4,392.93 6,432.38 5,294.49 2,047.04 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,983.81 4,753.78 7,280.29 5,729.39 2,272.09 9,973.02 7,922.96 12,133.81 9,548.98 3,786.82 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,986.51 3,961.48 6,066.91 4,774.49 1,893.41 8,310.85 6,602.47 10,111.51 7,957.49 3,155.68 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,989.21 3,169.18 4,853.52 3,819.59 1,514.73 6,648.68 5,281.97 8,089.21 6,365.99 2,524.54 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 8,435.01 6,118.72 10,262.57 7,374.46 3,083.30 14,058.35 10,197.87 17,104.29 12,290.77 5,138.84 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 7,029.18 5,098.93 8,552.14 6,145.39 2,569.42 11,715.30 8,498.22 14,253.57 10,242.31 4,282.36 R-1 Apartments/Hotel Transient 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 5,623.34 4,079.15 6,841.72 4,916.31 2,055.53 9,372.24 6,798.58 11,402.86 8,193.85 3,425.89 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,523.29 847.21 3,070.00 1,021.08 720.58 4,205.49 1,412.01 5,116.67 1,701.80 1,200.96 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,102.75 706.01 2,558.33 850.90 600.48 3,504.58 1,176.68 4,263.89 1,418.17 1,000.80 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,682.20 564.81 2,046.67 680.72 480.39 2,803.66 941.34 3,411.11 1,134.53 800.64 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,604.71 1,600.28 4,385.72 1,928.71 1,109.43 6,007.84 2,667.14 7,309.53 3,214.51 1,849.06 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,003.92 1,333.57 3,654.76 1,607.25 924.53 5,006.54 2,222.61 6,091.27 2,678.76 1,540.88 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,403.14 1,066.85 2,923.81 1,285.80 739.62 4,005.23 1,778.09 4,873.02 2,143.01 1,232.70 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,676.80 2,824.03 4,473.43 3,403.60 1,376.20 6,128.00 4,706.71 7,455.72 5,672.66 2,293.67 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,064.00 2,353.35 3,727.86 2,836.33 1,146.83 5,106.67 3,922.26 6,213.10 4,727.22 1,911.39 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,451.20 1,882.68 2,982.29 2,269.07 917.47 4,085.33 3,137.81 4,970.48 3,781.78 1,529.11 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,325.65 3,435.90 5,262.86 4,141.04 1,642.36 7,209.41 5,726.50 8,771.43 6,901.74 2,737.26 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,604.71 2,863.25 4,385.72 3,450.87 1,368.63 6,007.84 4,772.08 7,309.53 5,751.45 2,281.05 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,883.77 2,290.60 3,508.57 2,760.70 1,094.91 4,806.28 3,817.66 5,847.62 4,601.16 1,824.84 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,334.97 4,188.97 6,490.86 5,048.67 2,015.59 8,891.61 6,981.62 10,818.10 8,414.45 3,359.32 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,445.80 3,490.81 5,409.05 4,207.23 1,679.66 7,409.67 5,818.02 9,015.08 7,012.04 2,799.43 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,556.64 2,792.65 4,327.24 3,365.78 1,343.73 5,927.74 4,654.41 7,212.06 5,609.63 2,239.55 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 7,281.51 5,271.51 8,859.14 6,353.38 2,659.51 12,135.84 8,785.86 14,765.24 10,588.97 4,432.51 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 6,067.92 4,392.93 7,382.62 5,294.49 2,216.26 10,113.20 7,321.55 12,304.37 8,824.14 3,693.76 R-2 Multi-Family Residential Apartment - Perm 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,854.34 3,514.34 5,906.10 4,235.59 1,773.00 8,090.56 5,857.24 9,843.49 7,059.32 2,955.01 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,027.95 1,176.68 3,684.00 1,418.17 897.54 5,046.59 1,961.13 6,140.00 2,363.61 1,495.89 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,523.29 980.56 3,070.00 1,181.80 747.95 4,205.49 1,634.27 5,116.67 1,969.67 1,246.58 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,018.64 784.45 2,456.00 945.44 598.36 3,364.39 1,307.42 4,093.33 1,575.74 997.26 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,325.65 1,506.15 5,262.86 1,815.25 1,246.32 7,209.41 2,510.24 8,771.43 3,025.42 2,077.19 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,604.71 1,255.12 4,385.72 1,512.71 1,038.60 6,007.84 2,091.87 7,309.53 2,521.18 1,730.99 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,883.77 1,004.10 3,508.57 1,210.17 830.88 4,806.28 1,673.50 5,847.62 2,016.95 1,384.80 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,469.84 1,976.82 5,438.29 2,382.52 1,374.15 7,449.73 3,294.70 9,063.81 3,970.86 2,290.25 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,724.86 1,647.35 4,531.91 1,985.43 1,145.13 6,208.11 2,745.58 7,553.18 3,309.05 1,908.54 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,979.89 1,317.88 3,625.52 1,588.35 916.10 4,966.48 2,196.46 6,042.54 2,647.24 1,526.84 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,334.97 2,541.62 6,490.86 3,063.24 1,677.51 8,891.61 4,236.04 10,818.10 5,105.40 2,795.85 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,445.80 2,118.02 5,409.05 2,552.70 1,397.92 7,409.67 3,530.03 9,015.08 4,254.50 2,329.87 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,556.64 1,694.42 4,327.24 2,042.16 1,118.34 5,927.74 2,824.03 7,212.06 3,403.60 1,863.90 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 81 of 91

Page 528 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,488.47 3,341.76 7,894.29 4,027.59 2,091.64 10,814.12 5,569.61 13,157.15 6,712.65 3,486.07 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,407.06 2,784.80 6,578.57 3,356.33 1,743.04 9,011.77 4,641.34 10,964.29 5,593.88 2,905.06 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,325.65 2,227.84 5,262.86 2,685.06 1,394.43 7,209.41 3,713.07 8,771.43 4,475.10 2,324.05 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 8,867.58 4,330.17 10,788.86 5,218.85 2,809.96 14,779.30 7,216.95 17,981.43 8,698.08 4,683.27 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 7,389.65 3,608.48 8,990.72 4,349.04 2,341.63 12,316.08 6,014.13 14,984.53 7,248.40 3,902.72 R-2.1 Residential Care/Assist Living Facility 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 5,911.72 2,886.78 7,192.57 3,479.23 1,873.31 9,852.86 4,811.30 11,987.62 5,798.72 3,122.18 R-3 Single Family Residential 2,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,009.32 329.47 1,228.00 397.09 286.30 1,682.20 549.12 2,046.67 661.81 477.17 R-3 Single Family Residential 2,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 841.10 274.56 1,023.33 330.91 238.58 1,401.83 457.60 1,705.56 551.51 397.64 R-3 Single Family Residential 2,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 672.88 219.65 818.67 264.72 190.87 1,121.46 366.08 1,364.44 441.21 318.11 R-3 Single Family Residential 3,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,297.69 376.54 1,578.86 453.81 358.44 2,162.82 627.56 2,631.43 756.36 597.40 R-3 Single Family Residential 3,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,081.41 313.78 1,315.71 378.18 298.70 1,802.35 522.97 2,192.86 630.30 497.83 R-3 Single Family Residential 3,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 865.13 251.02 1,052.57 302.54 238.96 1,441.88 418.37 1,754.29 504.24 398.27 R-3 Single Family Residential 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,874.45 517.74 2,280.57 623.99 512.38 3,124.08 862.90 3,800.95 1,039.99 853.97 R-3 Single Family Residential 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,562.04 431.45 1,900.48 519.99 426.98 2,603.40 719.08 3,167.46 866.66 711.64 R-3 Single Family Residential 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,249.63 345.16 1,520.38 416.00 341.59 2,082.72 575.26 2,533.97 693.33 569.31 R-3 Single Family Residential 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,090.73 706.01 2,543.71 850.90 597.88 3,484.55 1,176.68 4,239.52 1,418.17 996.46 R-3 Single Family Residential 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,742.27 588.34 2,119.76 709.08 498.23 2,903.79 980.56 3,532.94 1,181.80 830.39 R-3 Single Family Residential 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,393.82 470.67 1,695.81 567.27 398.59 2,323.03 784.45 2,826.35 945.44 664.31 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,027.95 658.94 3,684.00 794.17 791.28 5,046.59 1,098.23 6,140.00 1,323.62 1,318.80 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,523.29 549.12 3,070.00 661.81 659.40 4,205.49 915.19 5,116.67 1,103.02 1,099.00 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,018.64 439.29 2,456.00 529.45 527.52 3,364.39 732.15 4,093.33 882.41 879.20 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,325.65 1,035.48 5,262.86 1,247.99 1,149.72 7,209.41 1,725.79 8,771.43 2,079.98 1,916.20 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,604.71 862.90 4,385.72 1,039.99 958.10 6,007.84 1,438.16 7,309.53 1,733.31 1,596.83 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,883.77 690.32 3,508.57 831.99 766.48 4,806.28 1,150.53 5,847.62 1,386.65 1,277.47 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,469.84 1,412.01 5,438.29 1,701.80 1,258.24 7,449.73 2,353.35 9,063.81 2,836.33 2,097.06 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,724.86 1,176.68 4,531.91 1,418.17 1,048.53 6,208.11 1,961.13 7,553.18 2,363.61 1,747.55 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,979.89 941.34 3,625.52 1,134.53 838.82 4,966.48 1,568.90 6,042.54 1,890.89 1,398.04 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,334.97 1,976.82 6,490.86 2,382.52 1,561.59 8,891.61 3,294.70 10,818.10 3,970.86 2,602.66 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,445.80 1,647.35 5,409.05 1,985.43 1,301.33 7,409.67 2,745.58 9,015.08 3,309.05 2,168.88 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,556.64 1,317.88 4,327.24 1,588.35 1,041.06 5,927.74 2,196.46 7,212.06 2,647.24 1,735.10 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,488.47 2,353.35 7,894.29 2,836.33 1,888.79 10,814.12 3,922.26 13,157.15 4,727.22 3,147.99 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,407.06 1,961.13 6,578.57 2,363.61 1,573.99 9,011.77 3,268.55 10,964.29 3,939.35 2,623.32 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,325.65 1,568.90 5,262.86 1,890.89 1,259.20 7,209.41 2,614.84 8,771.43 3,151.48 2,098.66 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 8,867.58 3,059.36 10,788.86 3,687.23 2,549.15 14,779.30 5,098.93 17,981.43 6,145.39 4,248.59 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 7,389.65 2,549.47 8,990.72 3,072.69 2,124.29 12,316.08 4,249.11 14,984.53 5,121.15 3,540.49 R-3.1 Residential Care Facility <6 Ambulatory 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 5,911.72 2,039.57 7,192.57 2,458.15 1,699.44 9,852.86 3,399.29 11,987.62 4,096.92 2,832.39 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 1,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 3,027.95 470.67 3,684.00 567.27 752.64 5,046.59 784.45 6,140.00 945.44 1,254.40 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 1,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 2,523.29 392.23 3,070.00 472.72 627.20 4,205.49 653.71 5,116.67 787.87 1,045.34 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 1,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,018.64 313.78 2,456.00 378.18 501.76 3,364.39 522.97 4,093.33 630.30 836.27 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,325.65 847.21 5,262.86 1,021.08 1,111.08 7,209.41 1,412.01 8,771.43 1,701.80 1,851.80 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,604.71 706.01 4,385.72 850.90 925.90 6,007.84 1,176.68 7,309.53 1,418.17 1,543.17 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,883.77 564.81 3,508.57 680.72 740.72 4,806.28 941.34 5,847.62 1,134.53 1,234.54 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 4,469.84 1,412.01 5,438.29 1,701.80 1,258.24 7,449.73 2,353.35 9,063.81 2,836.33 2,097.06 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 3,724.86 1,176.68 4,531.91 1,418.17 1,048.53 6,208.11 1,961.13 7,553.18 2,363.61 1,747.55 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 2,979.89 941.34 3,625.52 1,134.53 838.82 4,966.48 1,568.90 6,042.54 1,890.89 1,398.04 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 20,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 5,334.97 1,835.62 6,490.86 2,212.34 1,532.62 8,891.61 3,059.36 10,818.10 3,687.23 2,554.36 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 20,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 4,445.80 1,529.68 5,409.05 1,843.62 1,277.18 7,409.67 2,549.47 9,015.08 3,072.69 2,128.63 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 20,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 3,556.64 1,223.74 4,327.24 1,474.89 1,021.74 5,927.74 2,039.57 7,212.06 2,458.15 1,702.91 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 82 of 91

Page 529 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

MASTER FEE RECOVERY SCHEDULE

NON-MARKET BASED FEES
Inspection
Only
Total Dollar
Change
Total Dollar
Change
Current
Fee
Plan Check Only
(with PME
included)
Non Structural Structural
50%
Prior
Fee
Prior
Fee
30%
Current
Fee
R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 50,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 6,488.47 2,212.15 7,894.29 2,666.15 1,859.81 10,814.12 3,686.92 13,157.15 4,443.59 3,099.69 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 50,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 5,407.06 1,843.46 6,578.57 2,221.79 1,549.85 9,011.77 3,072.44 10,964.29 3,702.99 2,583.08 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 50,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 4,325.65 1,474.77 5,262.86 1,777.43 1,239.88 7,209.41 2,457.95 8,771.43 2,962.39 2,066.46 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 100,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 8,867.58 2,824.03 10,788.86 3,403.60 2,500.85 14,779.30 4,706.71 17,981.43 5,672.66 4,168.09 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 100,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 7,389.65 2,353.35 8,990.72 2,836.33 2,084.05 12,316.08 3,922.26 14,984.53 4,727.22 3,473.41 R-4 Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility 100,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 5,911.72 1,882.68 7,192.57 2,269.07 1,667.24 9,852.86 3,137.81 11,987.62 3,781.78 2,778.73 U Detached Access. Structure 2,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,153.51 611.87 1,403.43 737.45 375.50 1,922.51 1,019.79 2,339.05 1,229.08 625.83 U Detached Access. Structure 2,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 961.26 509.89 1,169.52 614.54 312.91 1,602.09 849.82 1,949.21 1,024.23 521.52 U Detached Access. Structure 2,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 769.00 407.91 935.62 491.63 250.33 1,281.67 679.86 1,559.37 819.38 417.22 U Detached Access. Structure 3,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 1,441.88 658.94 1,754.29 794.17 447.64 2,403.14 1,098.23 2,923.81 1,323.62 746.06 U Detached Access. Structure 3,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,201.57 549.12 1,461.91 661.81 373.03 2,002.61 915.19 2,436.51 1,103.02 621.72 U Detached Access. Structure 3,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 961.26 439.29 1,169.52 529.45 298.42 1,602.09 732.15 1,949.21 882.41 497.37 U Detached Access. Structure 5,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,090.73 988.41 2,543.71 1,191.26 655.84 3,484.55 1,647.35 4,239.52 1,985.43 1,093.06 U Detached Access. Structure 5,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,742.27 823.67 2,119.76 992.72 546.53 2,903.79 1,372.79 3,532.94 1,654.53 910.88 U Detached Access. Structure 5,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,393.82 658.94 1,695.81 794.17 437.22 2,323.03 1,098.23 2,826.35 1,323.62 728.71 U Detached Access. Structure 10,000 s.f. I-A, I-B, II-A 2,307.01 1,317.88 2,806.86 1,588.35 770.31 3,845.02 2,196.46 4,678.10 2,647.24 1,283.86 U Detached Access. Structure 10,000 s.f. II-B, III-A, V-A 1,922.51 1,098.23 2,339.05 1,323.62 641.93 3,204.18 1,830.39 3,898.41 2,206.04 1,069.88 U Detached Access. Structure 10,000 s.f. III-B, IV, V-B 1,538.01 878.59 1,871.24 1,058.90 513.54 2,563.35 1,464.31 3,118.73 1,764.83 855.90 Footnotes:

1. 30% is for non-structural review as determined by the Building Official.

2. 50% is for structural review as determined by the Building Official.

3. Minor rounding differences may occur as the actual permits are based on a percentage of Table A.

4. The plan check fee includes 3 reviews. Should there be more than 3 reviews, additional hourly fees will be charged at the hourly plan review rate.

5. Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan checks, an additional plan check fee shall be charged at the rate established by the fee schedule and minimum hours as determined by the Building Official.

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 83 of 91

Page 530 of 888 ends

EXHIBIT "A"

LRM DEPARTMENT - RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

SUBROGATION PROGRAM

COST RECOVERY PAYMENT SCHEDULE

FOR DAMAGE TO CITY PERSONAL PROPERTY

1. Specified Property - Cost Recovery Payment Amounts.

In lieu of documenting actual amounts incurred by the City following each incident resulting in damage to City personal property, City staff shall have the right to pursue and collect the following cost recovery amounts from any third party responsible for damage to the noted property, utilizing all collection and enforcement powers available under applicable law. The following amounts apply to each item of property damaged.

Fire Hydrants
The cost recovery payment amount for damage to a fire hydrant is based on recent historical average labor, material and vehicle costs to respond and repair or replace the fire hydrant using City personnel. If applicable, the billed amount shall also include the actual cost of water loss for each incident, as well as any third party equipment rental or other incurred costs.

Standard Costs Replacement Repair
City Labor Cost $809.61 $731.57
Material Cost $1,485.54 $172.61
Vehicle Cost $34.37 $61.56
$2,329.52 $965.74
Add:

Water Loss Actual Actual
Equipment Rental/Other Actual Actual
If the City contracts with a third party vendor to provide any portion of the services or materials covered by the above payment amount, the City shall not charge such duplicate portion(s) of the payment amount and shall only pursue and collect the total actual costs incurred by the City as provided for in Section 5 of the Resolution.

CA\JR\17000.24000\10165367.7
5 Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 84 of 91

Page 531 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 85 of 91

Page 532 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 86 of 91

Page 533 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 87 of 91

Page 534 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 88 of 91

Page 535 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 89 of 91

Page 536 of 888 ends

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 90 of 91

Page 537 of 888 ends

Taxes and Regulatory Fees Under Prop. 26
Prop. 26 adds a new definition of “tax” into the California Constitution providing that any governmentimposed charge, levy or exaction of any kind is a tax unless it falls into one of a seven express exemptions.

Local Government Taxes under Prop. 26. The measure adds the following language (identified by italics) to Article XIII C of the California Constitution (a portion of Prop. 218 governing taxes):

SECTION 1 (e) As used in this article, “tax” means any levy, charge or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government, except the following:
(1) A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.

Specific Benefit Exemption. Examples: planning permits, police permits, street closure permits, parking permits in restricted zones, some franchises — to the extent the privilege is not provided to those not charged, and the fee does not exceed the local government’s reasonable costs of service to the fee payer.
(2) A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.

Specific Government Service or Product Exemption. Examples: user fees including for utilities (most retail water, sewer, trash and stormwater fees are exempt under exemption #7, discussed below), public records copying fees, DUI emergency response fees, emergency medical and ambulance transport service fees, recreation classes, weed abatement to the extent that the service or product privilege is not provided to those not charged, and the fee does not exceed the reasonable costs of service to the local government. (3) A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.

Permits and Inspections Exemption. Examples: permits for regulated commercial activities (e.g., dance hall, bingo, card room, check cashing, taxicab, peddlers, catering trucks, massage parlor, firearm dealers, etc.); fire, health, environmental, safety permits; police background checks; pet licenses; bicycle licenses; (where the costs do not exceed the reasonable regulatory costs to the local government for issuing the license or permit.) (4) A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property or the purchase rental or lease of local government property.

Local Government Property Exemption. Examples: facility rental fees, room rental fees, equipment rental fees, on and off-street parking, tolls, franchise, park entrance, museum admission, zoo admission, tipping fees, golf green fees, etc. (5) A fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government as a result of a violation of law, including late payment fees, fees imposed under administrative citation ordinances, parking violations, etc.

Penalty for Illegal Activity Exemption. Examples: parking fines, code enforcement fees and penalties, late payment fees, interest charges and other charges for violation of the law. (6) A charge imposed as a condition of property development.

Property Development Exemption. Examples: planning, CEQA, and building permit fees, construction permits, development impact fees, fees imposed to remedy the effects of the fee payor’s operation that are imposed as a condition of property development (including CEQA mitigation measures requiring the payment of money).
(7) Assessments and property related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIII D. (Proposition 218).

Prop. 218 Exemption. Examples: assessments on real property for special benefit conferred, fees imposed upon a parcel or a person as an incident of property ownership, and fees for a property related service such as many retail water and sewer fees.

Exhibit 2 - Resolution No. 2024-100 with Master Fee Recovery Schedule Page 91 of 91

Page 538 of 888 ends

Donna Finch
Community Services Director
October 16, 2024

Page 539 of 888 ends

That the City Council provide feedback and direction on athletic field reservation rates.

Page 540 of 888 ends

Page 541 of 888 ends

• Adopted February 7, 2024
• Creates a unified vision and
planning framework for the
enhancement and long-term
sustainability of parks and
recreation facilities and programs
• Includes initiatives and
recommended actions to upgrade
the park experience, improve
recreation programs, maintain and
manage assets, and sustain parks
and recreation services long-term

Page 542 of 888 ends

• Financial Sustainability Strategy is a key component of the PRMP to ensure long term sustainability of the parks system:
• Identifies a baseline measurement for the cost of services • Evaluates the balance between tax subsidy and fees/charges • Defines the philosophy for funding strategies
• Multiple workshops held to discuss financial sustainability philosophy, service categories, beneficiary of service, cost-of-service analysis, and goal setting for the future:
• May 19, 2022 – Special Parks & Rec Commission Meeting • August 15, 2022 – Special Parks & Rec Commission Meeting • October 26, 2022 – Special Parks & Rec Commission Meeting

Page 543 of 888 ends

• Open Access Services
• Community Health & Wellbeing Services
• Signature Events
• Drop-In Activities
• Partnered Specialized Community Events
• Skill-Based Activities
• Education/Enrichment Services
• Reservations
Service Categories
• Who benefits from the service is a primary
driver in making standardized pricing
decisions
• Services categorized and ranked from
Common Good services progressing to
Individual Benefit services
• Common Good services are accessible to all
in a community and provide universal value
• Individual Benefit services provide exclusive
specialized benefit to individuals and can
include constraints or barriers to access
Beneficiary of Service Model

Page 544 of 888 ends

• Higher subsidies for
services for the common
good
• Lower or no subsidies for
individualized services
• Encourages defensible
subsidy allocation
• Establishes a more
equitable cost recovery
strategy for resident user
groups

Page 545 of 888 ends

Athletic Field Reservations:

FY24 Expenditures = $1,700,189
FY24 Revenue = $242,025
Cost Recovery = 14%
Skill-Based Activities: classes and other
instructed activities in which the primary
intent is to acquire or learn a skill;
includes youth sports, STEM classes,
fitness activities, and contract classes.

Page 546 of 888 ends

Page 547 of 888 ends

• Athletic field reservations have not received a rate analysis since 2018 • A recent update to the Master Fee Recovery Schedule increased hourly field reservation rates as follows:
• Group II (Resident Recreation Non-Profit) – from $10/hr. to $20/hr. • Group III (Resident Competitive Non-Profit) – from $19/hr. to $25/hr. • Group IV (Resident Private/For-Profit) – from $31/hr. to $40/hr. • Group V (Non-Resident) – from $41/hr. to $50/hr.
• Rates were determined based on cost recovery goals in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan • Several sports leagues are paying an outdated Group IIY rate of $4/hr. previously offered to teams on the Youth Sports Advisory Council (YSAC). YSAC was eliminated in 2019, but the billing rate change did not occur

Page 548 of 888 ends

Hourly Rates*
Cities Resident Recreation
Non-Profit Groups
Resident Competitive
Non-Profit Groups
Private/NonResident Groups
Rancho Cucamonga $21 $21 $32
Fontana $10 $15 $21
Ontario $15 $15 $50
Chino $10 / $11 $10 / $11 $16
Riverside $2.50 / $8 $2.50 / $8 $18
Murrieta $26 $26 $31
Corona $20 $25 $40 / $50
* Based on fees published in Master Fee Schedules; does not include hourly rates for lighting. Page 549 of 888 Expenditures Revenues Cost Recovery
FY24 Field Rates $1,700,189 $242,085 14%
FY25 Field Rates $1,700,189 $958,055 56%

Page 550 of 888 ends

Page 551 of 888 ends

Current Registration
Cost (@$4hr)
Fee Impact**
New Registration Cost
(@$20hr)
Soccer
AYSO $175 $59 (34%~) $234
United $180 $35 (20%~) $215
Arsenal FC $895-$1,095 $33 (3%-4%~) $928 - $1,128
Baseball
Pony $175-$245 $51 (21%-29%~) $226 - $296
National Little League $175 $119 (68%~) $294
American Little League $140-230 $134 (58%-96%~) $274 - $364 Softball Corona Girls Softball Association $175-250 $123 (49%-70%~) $298 - $373 Football Corona Chargers $385 $16 (4%~) $401
*Rates are estimated assuming that each league utilizes the same field rentals as the previous year. Actual costs will vary based on the average number of kids per team and the total hours of field space the leagues reserve per season
** Figures rounded to the nearest dollar

Page 552 of 888 ends

($4hr - $20hr)
Option 1
Implement
Rates as
Adopted
($4-$12-$20)
Option 2
Phase in Over
2 Years
Option 4
Phase in Over
4 Years
Option 3
Phase in Over
3 Years
($4-$9-$14-$20) ($4-8-12-16-$20)
Option 5
Other?

Page 553 of 888 ends

That the City Council provide feedback and direction on athletic field reservation rates.

Page 554 of 888 ends

Page 555 of 888 ends

DATE: 10/16/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Public Works Department
2024-93

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

PRESENTATION OF FLEET SERVICES VEHICLE PURCHASING AND LEASING

PROGRAM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report gives the City Council an overview of Fleet Services’ vehicle purchasing and lease program.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council confirm the city’s fleet program that entails a mix of owned and leased vehicles.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

City council approved a pilot program to lease vehicles in 2016 and continue using them in subsequent years. The pilot program was successful, and the master agreement was subsequently amended to provide an alternative to purchasing city vehicles.

ANALYSIS:

The City’s Fleet Division under the Public Works Department is responsible for procuring and maintaining the City’s vehicles to support the city's wide range of services. The City of Corona currently has a total of 410 vehicles, of which 229 are city-owned or have been directly purchased, while 181 are leased through Enterprise Fleet Management. A mix of leased and city-owned vehicles is used in all Departments within the City. When the

Page 556 of 888 ends

vehicle is ready to be replaced, the respective Department will work with the Fleet Division to assess the department’s needs and decide whether to lease or purchase a vehicle based on availability, use, and the department's needs.

In 2016, the City entered into an agreement with Enterprise Fleet Management that allows the option to lease vehicles. The advantage of leasing a vehicle is that there are overall cost savings in maintenance and operational costs because the City is only using the vehicle for 4-5 years. The City can capitalize on the high resale value, which is used to reduce the cost of the next leased vehicle. The advantages of utilizing leasing vehicles and their limitations are summarized below.

Advantages:
 Vehicles could either be sourced locally or ordered from a manufacturer.  Vehicles can be tailored or upfitted to meet all safety and compliance standards.  Maintenance of the vehicle is included in the contract or lease price.  Leased vehicle turnover is 4-5 years, keeping the city’s fleet new and updated.  There is an overall cost savings for leased vehicles compared to purchased ones.

Limitations:
 Not every vehicle is available for leasing.
 Some vehicles for certain types of use will not benefit from the leasing program.  Staff assigned to the vehicle are responsible for the upkeep.

Overall, the leasing program has been a success and, therefore, staff recommends that the City Council confirm the Fleet Division’s fleet program that entails a mix of owned and leased vehicles. This staff report and presentation is for receipt and file; therefore, no action is necessary.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

This is merely an overview of the city’s vehicle purchasing and leasing program. There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action provides an overview of the Fleet Division’s vehicle purchasing and leasing program. Since there is no possibility that this action will have a significant effect on the environment, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: MICHAEL GRIESINGER, FLEET MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: SAVAT KHAMPHOU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Page 557 of 888 ends

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Presentation

Page 558 of 888 ends

Michael Griesinger
Fleet Manager

Page 559 of 888 ends

2 To receive City Council confirmation on the City’s
fleet program mix of owned and leased vehicles.

Page 560 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Agenda
Fleet Overview
Lease Option
Summary
01 Purchase vs. Lease
02 03
04 3
05 Questions?

Page 561 of 888 ends

Overview

Page 562 of 888 ends

City of Corona 5
The Fleet Division under the Public Works Department is responsible for procuring and maintaining the city’s vehicles.

The Division ensures:
• The right quantity of vehicles to support staff,
• Vehicles are upfitted with necessary, aftermarket equipment, • The right type/class of vehicle are provided,
• Vehicles available at the right time, and
• Vehicles meet state and federal compliance.

Fleets Responsibility

Page 563 of 888 ends

City of Corona 6
The City of Corona currently has a total of 410 vehicles • 229 are city-owned or have been directly purchased
• 181 are leased through Enterprise Fleet Management (Enterprise) • All departments are currently leasing vehicles from Enterprise Fleet size
181
Leased
229
Owned
410
Total

Page 564 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Med/Heavy Duty
42%
Van
1%
Car
10%
Suv
38%
Truck
9%
Med/Heavy Duty Van Car Suv Truck
Total Owned:
229
Vehicle
Type Quantity Average Age
Average
Mileage
Truck 20 8 64,300
Suv 88 8 56,200
Car 22 6 73,400
Van 3 7 25,185
Med/Heavy
Duty 96 14 74,440
TOTALS 229 8.6 58,705
Purchased Vehicle Classes

Page 565 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Toyota
2% Freightliner
11%
KME
6%
Nissan
2%
Dodge
9%
Ford
56%
Volvo
1%
International
6%
Chevrolet
5%
GMC
1%
Honda
1%
Toyota Freightliner KME Nissan Dodge Ford Volvo International Chevrolet GMC Honda Manufacturers:
11 Purchased Vehicle Profiles

Page 566 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Med Duty
5% Van
5%
Car
17%
Suv
23%
Truck
50%
Med Duty Van Car Suv Truck
Total Leased:
181
Vehicle
Type Quantity Average Age
Average
Mileage
Truck 90 4.4 17,315
SUV 42 4.1 17,270
Car 30 4.1 27,960
Van 10 2.1 4,876
Med Duty 9 4.0 17,760
TOTALS 181 3.8 17,036
Leased Vehicle Classes

Page 567 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Toyota
3%
Chrysler
1%
Nissan
19%
Dodge
4%
Ford
46%
Hyundai
2%
Ram
7%
Chevrolet
15%
GMC
1%
Honda
2%
Toyota Chrysler Nissan Dodge Ford Hyundai Ram Chevrolet GMC Honda Manufacturers:
11 Lease Vehicle Profiles

Page 568 of 888 ends

Overview

Page 569 of 888 ends

City of Corona 12
In 2016, the City entered into a contract with Enterprise Fleet Management, allowing the City the option to lease its vehicles.

Advantages
• Vehicles could either be sourced locally or ordered from a manufacturer. • Vehicles can be tailored or upfitted to meet all safety and compliance standards. • Maintenance of the vehicle is included in the contract or lease price. • Leased vehicle turnover is 4-5 years, keeping city’s fleet new and updated. • There is an overall cost savings for leased vehicles compared to a purchased or owned vehicle.

Limitations
• Not every vehicle is available for leasing.
• Some vehicles for certain types of usage will not benefit from the leasing program. • Staff assigned to the vehicle is responsible for the upkeep.

Lease Option

Page 570 of 888 ends

Page 571 of 888 ends

City of Corona 14
$2,058
$5,638
$7,696
$15,342
$4,188
$6,890
$11,078 $10,905
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
Annual O&M Annual Replacement Cost Annual Motorpool Rate Resale Price (Vehicle Service Life)
Unit# 70204 (Lease) Unit# 71151 (City-Owned)
Single Vehicle Cost Comparison

Page 572 of 888 ends

City of Corona 15
$47,955
$124,056
$172,011
$375,550
$84,429
$153,509
$237,938
$269,625
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
Annual O&M Annual Replacement Cost Annual Motorpool Rate Resale Price (Vehicle Service Life) Lease City-Owned
25 Vehicle Cost Comparison

Page 573 of 888 ends

Page 574 of 888 ends

City of Corona 17
Summary
• Fleet works with all departments to determine
which vehicles to purchase or lease.
• Fleet may directly purchase vehicles (city owned)
and has the option to lease.

Recommendations
• Continue to monitor the efficiency of the
purchasing and leasing program.
• Replace city-owned vehicles with leased vehicles,
when appropriate and cost effective.

Summary - Fleet Utilization

Page 575 of 888 ends

18 To receive City Council confirmation on the City’s
fleet program mix of owned and leased vehicles.

Page 576 of 888 ends

Questions?
19 Page 577 of 888
DATE: 10/16/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Office of Economic Development
2024-95

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE CORONA CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE FOR BUSINESS PROMOTION, MARKETING, AND RETENTION

SERVICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to consider approving the proposed agreement between the City and the Corona Chamber of Commerce for Business Promotion, Marketing, and Retention Services for a total value of $69,000 in monetary and in-kind services.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the Corona Chamber of Commerce for Business Promotion, Marketing, and Retention Services.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The Office of Economic Development partners with various local, regional, state, and federal agencies to enhance the City’s business offerings and resources to more than 12,000 businesses operating in Corona. Through these partnerships, the City leverages resources to address varied business needs. These partnerships position the City to offer a variety of programs, services, grants, and technical assistance to aid business growth and resiliency in Corona.

Page 578 of 888 ends

For many years, the City and the Corona Chamber of Commerce (“the Chamber”) have entered into a Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) for business promotion, marketing, and retention services. In September 2023, the City Council approved a oneyear Agreement between the City and the Chamber for a not-to-exceed total amount of $60,250. Through the Agreement, the Chamber provided a customized marketing package to promote services to businesses, partnered on six business events, and included a City sponsorship of three Good Morning Corona events.

ANALYSIS:

For Fiscal Year 2025, the Chamber proposed an expanded range of services and sponsorship in the total amount of $186,050. Staff compared the FY25 proposal to the FY24 agreement to highlight the differences between the proposal and the previous year’s agreement.

Table 1: Comparison of Fiscal Year 2024 Agreement and Fiscal Year 2025 Proposal Item FY 2024
Cost
FY 2025
Cost
Differences
Workshops/Webinars $20,000 $60,000 Chamber proposing to hold 12 workshops, increasing from 4 in
FY24
Good Morning Corona
(GMC) Sponsorship
$8,250 $15,050 Chamber proposing City
sponsorship of 3 GMC events, plus
City exhibitor table at 7 other GMC
events. Per GMC sponsorship
increasing from $2,750 to $3,500.

Exhibitor table costs of $650 per
GMC.

Manufacturing Month $10,000 $10,000 No change proposed.

New Business
Reception
$4,000 $8,000 Chamber proposing to host 2 New
Business Receptions instead of 1.

Executive Partner
Customized Marketing
Package
$18,000 $25,000 No changes to scope of marketing
package. Price increase of $7,000.

Grand Opening/Ribbon
Cutting and Anniversary
Events
Free $18,000 New proposed item for FY 2025.

Charges the City a speaker fee for
ribbon cutting events.

Taste of Corona N/A $25,000 New proposed item for FY 2025.

Business Expo/Job Fair N/A $25,000 New proposed item for FY 2025.

City and Chamber partnered on a
Job Fair in 2023 for $10,000.

TOTAL $60,250 $186,050 308% increase
Staff utilized the City’s Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) to identify how the services and sponsorship opportunities in the proposal attempt to meet or advance each of the six strategic goals in the EDSP. The rationale is listed below and a summary is found in table 2.

Page 579 of 888 ends

 Workshops/Webinars:
o 1.1: Increase visitations and outreach to businesses. o 1.2: Augment entrepreneurial pathways through expanded/enhanced partnerships.
o 1.5: Enhance partnership with Chamber to create additional support for economic and workforce development initiatives.
o 1.11: Offer an in-person Small Business Symposium.
o 4.4 Host broker/property manager education events.
 Good Morning Corona:
o 1.1: Increase visitations and outreach to businesses.  Business Expo/Job Fair:
o 1.5: Enhance partnership with Chamber to create additional support for economic and workforce development initiatives.
 Manufacturing Month:
o 2.3 Build upon success of Manufacturing Assistance Program.  New Business Receptions:
o 1.6: Build upon success of New Business Reception.
 Executive Partner/Custom Marketing Package:
o 2.1: Enhance promotion of Team Corona.

Table 2: Alignment of Proposed Initiatives with City EDSP Goals Initiative Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5 Goal 6
Workshops/Webinars X X
Good Morning Corona X
Taste of Corona
Business Expo/Job Fair
Grand Openings/Ribbon
Cuttings
Manufacturing Month X
New Business Receptions X
Executive Partner/Custom
Marketing Package X
Through an iterative process, City staff and Chamber Leadership discussed each of the proposed items and came to an agreement on a revised scope of services, sponsorships, and in-kind donations. These are presented in table 3.

Table 3. Comparison of FY 24 agreement, FY 25 proposal, and FY25 Agreement Scope Item FY24
Agreement
FY25
Proposal
Amount
Agreed

Page 580 of 888 ends

Executive Membership with Customized
Marketing Package
$18,000 $25,000 $18,000
Workshops/Webinars $20,000 $60,000 $20,000
Good Morning Corona $8,250 $15,050 $6,250
Manufacturing Visits $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
New Business Reception $4,000 $8,000 $4,000
Taste of Corona $0 $25,000 $0
Grand Openings/Ribbon Cutting Events $0 $18,000 $0
Executive Leadership Roundtable (ELR) $3,500
Host Local Government ELR Day $3,000
Job Fair $0 $25,000 $1,250
Chamber Working Group Meetings $3,000
Women’s Leadership Conference NOT IN

ORIGINAL

PROPOSAL
$0
World Trade Conference for Inland Empire /
Riverside County
NOT IN

ORIGINAL

PROPOSAL
$0
TOTAL $60,250 $186,050 $69,000
The rationale for each staff recommendation is described below.

1. Executive Partner Customized Marketing Package: The Chamber proposal includes a variety of services for the City as an Executive Partner. These include the City’s membership and multiple opportunities to highlight City priorities. Staff worked with the Chamber to adjust the level of sponsorship from $25,000 to $18,000. The rationale for this cost reduction is that this item had an increase in costs from $15,000 to $18,000 between FY23 and FY24 and the FY25 proposal had an increased year-over-year cost (from $18,000 to $25,000 or 38.9% increase) without a corresponding increase in services or benefits to the City.

2. Workshops / Webinars: During FY24, the Chamber hosted four workshops on the following topics: Manufacturing, Veterans Resources, Healthcare, and Restaurants. The Chamber advertises these events to an estimated 10,000 members via their membership list and promotional materials. The total number of participants for the four workshops was:

Manufacturing Workshop: 30 attendees
Veterans Resources Workshop: 21 attendees.

Healthcare Workshop: 41 attendees.

Restaurants Workshop: 20 attendees.

Page 581 of 888 ends

Staff recognize the potential value of the Chamber hosting workshops on relevant topics for the business community, but rather than expand the number of workshops to attract more participants, Staff are recommending that the Chamber continue to host 4 workshops but offer them on broader topics to attract and serve a larger number of Corona businesses. As indicated in the proposal, the Chamber will provide a list of attendees and summary of the event to gauge their effectiveness and reach.

2. Good Morning Corona (GMC): Staff recommends continuing to sponsor three Good Morning Corona events (Honoring Corona Police and Corona Fire, State of the County, and Business State of the City) at the Silver Sponsorship level ($1,750 each). Because the GMC ‘Honoring Corona Police and Corona Fire’ occurred prior to approval of an agreement, this year its proposed that the City sponsor the GMC event ‘Honoring Veterans’ as a substitute. Staff also recommend the addition of up to $1,000 in the contract for City representatives to attend other GMC events at the discounted ticket price for Chamber members.

3. Manufacturing Visits: The Chamber proposed to have the City sponsor visits during Manufacturing Month (October) in the amount of $10,000. In the proposal, they have identified their efforts to include business engagement for participation, leading marketing and promotional efforts, and organizing educational sessions, facility tours, panel discussions, workshops, and job fairs to promote manufacturing. The FY24 manufacturing visits were successful for the organizers and participants, and staff recommend continuing these visits in FY25. Because this agreement is being presented to Council in October, staff recommend that these visits be scheduled throughout the year but prior to the end of June 2025.

4. New Business Receptions: The Chamber proposes to collaborate with the City on two New Business Receptions in the amount of $8,000 ($4,000 each). City staff have historically served as the primary coordinator for the New Business Reception and have partnered with the Chamber in order to reach a greater audience. The Chamber serves as a promotional partner in sharing information with its newest members to secure their attendance. Staff recommends continuing the practice of hosting one New Business Reception as part of the FY25 Agreement.

5. Taste of Corona: The Chamber proposed to have the City serve as the presenting sponsor of the Taste of Corona event in the amount of $25,000, plus City staff to provide event support and waiving of City-related permitting fees. Given the substantial cost of sponsorship, plus the cost of staffing the event, staff do not recommend this proposed item. However, City representatives who wish to attend the event would still be able to purchase discounted tickets via the City’s Chamber membership.

6. Grand Openings / Ribbon Cuttings: The Chamber proposal was to have the City collaborate on Grand Openings and Ribbon Cutting events. These events are a free benefit for Chamber members. The proposed cost to the City for this collaboration would have been $18,000 annually ($1,500 per month), regardless of the number of events.

Page 582 of 888 ends

Staff and the Chamber mutually agreed to not include this item as part of the FY25 services agreement.

7. Executive Leadership Roundtable (ELR): This item was not addressed in the Chamber’s original proposal. For many years, at least two City Staff have been invited to participate in the Chamber’s ELR program as participants. Participation in this program builds bridges of understanding and trust with other ELR participants. Staff are recommending continuing to sponsor staff participation in the program and to consolidate the cost of participating in this program in the Chamber service agreement to better reflect the City’s support for the Chamber’s efforts with the business community.

8. Hosting Local Government ELR Day: This item was not addressed in the Chamber’s original proposal. For many years, City Staff have hosted the ELR program participants for a full day of presentations about the City at City Hall. Staff are recommending continuing this practice because it also builds bridges of understanding and trust between City staff and ELR participants. Staff are recommending that the in-kind donation of staff time to this program be reflected in the agreement with the Chamber.

9. Business Expo / Job Fair: The Chamber proposal is to have the City sponsor a regional Business Expo and Job Fair in the amount of $25,000. After much discussion about the Chamber’s vision for this event, staff determined that it is not in alignment with the ‘Live Work Corona’ initiative, which is intended to connect local employers with local residents to improve the quality of life in the City, invest in the community, support local job growth, and reduce traffic congestion. However, because the event will likely have a beneficial impact for some of our residents and business owners, staff do recommend an in-kind donation of the rental fees and staff time associated with the use of the Circle City Center Banquet Hall for this all day event.

10. Chamber working group meetings. This item was not included in the Chamber’s original proposal. In discussions with Chamber leadership, they noted the need to have a larger space for working group meetings. Staff are recommending an in-kind donation of the rental fees and associated staff time for the Chamber to use the Multipurpose Room at City Hall or half of the Circle City Banquet Hall for a mid-week, lunch-time, three-hour working group meeting each month.

11. Women’s Leadership Conference. This item was not included in the Chamber’s original proposal. During the discussions with staff, Chamber leadership asked that the FY25 agreement reflect their request that the City consider sponsoring the Women’s Leadership Conference in FY26. The FY25 event took place August 8th, 2024, so there is no ask for the FY25 agreement.

12. World Trade Conference for the Inland Empire / Riverside County. This item was not included in the Chamber’s original proposal. During a brief discussion with staff, Chamber leadership asked the City to consider sponsoring their bid to host this event in Corona at a level of $5,000 or more. Given the level of information available about the event and

Page 583 of 888 ends

the short amount of time given to consider this addition to the proposal, staff do not recommend sponsoring the event.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the Corona Chamber of Commerce for Business Promotion, Marketing, and Retention Services in the amount of $69,000. This is an 14.5% increase over the FY24 agreement, and within the Council-approved FY25 budget line item for these services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The Economic Development Department’s approved Fiscal Year 2025 budget includes a line item with sufficient funds for this contractual agreement with the Chamber.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action simply recommends Council provide direction on a formalized agreement between the City and Chamber for business promotion, marketing, and retention services and there is no possibility that this action will have a significant effect on the environment PREPARED BY: JUSTIN TUCKER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: JUSTIN TUCKER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Corona Chamber of Commerce Proposal

2. Exhibit 2 – Table of Agreement

3. Exhibit 3 - GMC Sponsorship Flier

4. Exhibit 4 - GMC Taste of Corona Sponsorship Flier

Page 584 of 888 ends

Page 585 of 888 ends

Page 586 of 888 ends

Page 587 of 888 ends

Page 588 of 888 ends

Page 589 of 888 ends

Page 590 of 888 ends

Page 591 of 888 ends

Page 592 of 888 ends

Page 593 of 888 ends

Page 594 of 888 ends

Page 595 of 888 ends

Page 596 of 888 ends

Page 597 of 888 ends

Page 598 of 888 ends

Page 599 of 888 ends

Page 600 of 888 ends

Page 601 of 888 ends

Page 602 of 888 ends

Page 603 of 888 ends

Page 604 of 888 ends

Page 605 of 888 ends

Page 606 of 888 ends

Page 607 of 888 ends

Page 608 of 888 ends

Page 609 of 888 ends

Scope Item
FY24
Agreement FY25 Proposal
Amount
Agreed Staff Comments
Chamber Recommendations and
Comments
Executive Membership with
Customized Marketing
Package $18,000 $25,000 $18,000
Staff recommend the Executive
Membership and Marketing package
to highlight City. KEEP AS PRESENTED
Workshops/Webinars $20,000 $60,000 $20,000
Staff recommend four (4) workshops
focused on topics pertinent to the
city's business community broadly. KEEP AS PRESENTED
Good Morning Corona $8,250 $15,050 $6,250
Staff recommend to sponsor 3 GMC
events at the Silver Sponsor Level
($1750 each) and that Members of
Council and Staff purchase tickets at
the discounted membership rate via
the City's Chamber membership (up
to $1,000).

The Chamber recommends that 4 various
GMC events would be shown as a SILVER
sponsor level of $1,750 each; Police Fire
(Aug 2024) Veteran (Nov 2024) State of
County and City in 2025 – since Aug has
lapsed, only 3 during this contract year.

PLUS, an additional $1,000 for individual
tickets secured for other GMC events
during the contract period (you already
purchased tickets for August’s Police /
Fire event, so those payments would be
from this extra $1,000)
Manufacturing Visits $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Staff recommend this line item, as
manufacturing visits align well with
the goals of the Economic
Development Strategic Plan. KEEP AS PRESENTED
Corona Chamber of Commerce Contract Proposal FY 2025

Page 610 of 888 ends

New Business Reception $4,000 $8,000 $4,000
Staff recommend hosting a new
business reception annually. KEEP AS PRESENTED
Taste of Corona $0 $25,000 $0
Staff recommend that Members of
Council interested in this event
purchase tickets at the discounted
membership rate via the City's
Chamber membership
The Chamber recommends a sponsorship
level of $5,000 enabling exposure for the
city and partnering with the Chamber. We
would include up to 4 exhibit booth
spaces, for departments selected by City.

This was declined by City Staff, and
possibly will consider later in the year
Grand Openings/Ribbon
Cutting Events $0 $18,000 $0
Staff does not recommend paying
for a speaking opportunity at grand
openings/ribbon cuttings.

Though no monies allocated for this item,
the value that the Chamber provides a
variety of businesses opening their doors,
or celebrating various milestones is a
positive for the city of Corona.

Executive Leadership
Roundtable (ELR) $3,500
Staff recommend having two City
staff participate in ELR annually.

The Chamber would agree to this, for 2 for
this contract year (Police and Fire have
enrolled participants into this program)
Host Local Government ELR
Day $3,000
Staff recommend hosting the ELR
group for Local Government Day.

The associated staff time is valued
at approximately $3,000.

The Chamber Agrees with this in-kind
portion

Page 611 of 888 ends

Job Fair $0 $25,000 $1,250
Staff recommend an in - kind
donation of the rental fees and staff
time associated with the use of the
Circle City Center for an all day Job
Fair. The associated cost is
approximately $1,250.

The Chamber Agrees with this in-kind
portion
Chamber Working Group
Meetings $3,000
Staff recommend an in - kind
donation of the rental fees and staff
time associated with the use of the
Multipurpose Room at City Hall OR
half of the Circle City Center
banquet room for a mid-week, lunchtime, 3 hour working group meeting each month. The associated in-kind
donation has an approximate value
of $3,000.

The Chamber Agrees with this in-kind
portion
Women’s Leadership
Conference
NOT IN

ORIGINAL
PROPOSAL $0
The Chamber recommends the City of
Corona review this program for the 2025-
2026 agreement.

World Trade Conference for
Inland Empire / Riverside
County NOT IN

ORIGINAL
PROPOSAL $0
The CORONA Chamber will be hosting this
event which will be the 31st annual
program on Wednesday, May 21. Consider
sponsoring this event at $5,000 or more,
and we can provide seating, and exhibit
space – the City Staff has removed this
currently with possible consideration
going forward

Page 612 of 888 ends

TOTAL $60,250 $186,050 $69,000 *
* Total does not include the value of
Chamber event promotion to the
City's 76,270 followers on Facebook,
Instagram, Linkedin, and primary
social media accounts.

Total value of agreement is $69,000 with
$61,750 as payment for services and
$7,250 as in-kind contribution for FY25
(July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025)

Page 613 of 888 ends

Saturday, June 22 from 12pm – 4pm
The Shops at Dos Lagos
2780 Cabot Dr., Corona, CA 92883

Page 614 of 888 ends

Taste of Corona is Corona’s premier tasting experience that showcases the thriving and diverse culinary culture, unique beverages, and successful vendors that Corona has to offer! This event attracts attendees from all over Riverside County who love to frequent Corona’s establishments.

Sponsors will be able to reach an audience of up to tens of thousands of people through various promotions that involve Taste of Corona. Additionally, expected attendance will be over 500 people, sponsors get valuable face time with a premier audience before, during and after the event.

Taste of Corona participants is open to all restaurants, coffee shops, bakeries, breweries/bars, home kitchens, caterers, food establishments, and food distributors.

Non-industry establishments see pricing.

WHAT IS TASTE OF CORONA?

Page 615 of 888 ends

Saturday,
June 22
12pm
– 4pm
The
Shops
at Dos
Lagos
2780
Cabot Dr.

Corona,
CA 92883
Median
Age
35 Location:

Within
Riverside
County
limits
Annual
Income:
$105K
Dining:
$13,702
spent annually
(or) $264
weekly
AVERAGE ATTENDEE:

THE 411

TICKET PRICES/ENTRY EXHIBITOR COSTS
Corona Chamber
Restaurant/Food members
FREE!
($250 refundable deposit required)
Non-Corona Chamber
Restaurant/Food members
$500
Community Booth/
Non-Food Corona Chamber
Members ONLY
(Limited spaces available)
$500
$20
Reserve your spot today before we sell out! Contact Deserie Ramirez at (951) 737-3350 or [email protected]
$30INCLUDES
10 TASTES

ADDITIONAL
10 TASTES

Page 616 of 888 ends

Master Chef Level $15,000
(2 available)
✓ Exhibitor booth – Preferred placement (20’x10’)
✓ Recognition at event as Master Chef Sponsor
(Presenting Sponsor)
✓ Logo on welcome banner
✓ Logo on event tickets
✓ 25 event tickets
✓ Logo on event food tray
✓ Logo on Taste of Corona website, social media, and
marketing materials
✓ Logo on centerpieces at tables
✓ Mic time 3-5 minutes
Bistro Beats $7,000
(2 available)
✓ Exhibitor booth (10’x10’)
✓ Recognition at event as Bistro Beats Sponsor
(Entertainment Sponsor)
✓ Logo on welcome banner
✓ 12 event tickets
✓ Logo on the Taste of Corona website, social media,
and marketing materials
✓ Sponsor banner at stage/entertainment area
✓ Logo on centerpieces at tables
Gourmet Level $5,000
✓ Exhibitor booth (10’x10’)
✓ Recognition at event as Gourmet Sponsor
✓ Logo on welcome banner
✓ 10 event tickets
✓ Logo on Taste of Corona website, social media, and
marketing materials
✓ Logo on centerpieces at tables
Bon Appetit Level $3,000
✓ Exhibitor booth (10’x10’)
✓ Public recognition at event as Bon Appetit Sponsor
✓ Logo on welcome banner
✓ 6 event tickets
✓ Logo on Taste of Corona website, social media and
marketing materials
A La Carte $1,500
✓ Exhibitor booth (10’x10’)
✓ Public recognition at event as A La Carte Sponsor
✓ 4 event tickets
✓ Logo on website, social media, and marketing
materials
2024 SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES
Reserve your spot today before we sell out! Contact Deserie Ramirez at (951) 737-3350 or [email protected] Page 617 of 888 Please complete all areas
Name: _____________________________________________________________ Business: __________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________ City/St/Zip: _________________________________________________________ Phone: ____________________________________________________________ Email: _____________________________________________________________ Sponsorship Selected: Master Chef $15,000
Bistro Beats $7,000
Gourmet $5,000
Bon Appetit $3,000
A La Carte $1,500
Member Food Booth FREE
Non-Member Food Booth $500
Community (non-food) Booth $500

PAYMENT METHODS
Checks payable to CORONA Chamber
Credit Card Amount to charge_____________________________________ CC # ______________________________________________________________ EXP Date: ______/______ Security Code: _______________________________ Name on Card: _____________________________________________________ Billing Address: _____________________________________________________ Billing ZIP: _________________________________________________________ Signature: _________________________________________________________ 2024 SPONSORSHIP FORM
COMPLETED FORM PLEASE SEND VIA:

Email: [email protected]
Mail: CORONA Chamber, 904 E. Sixth St., CORONA, CA 92879 Questions, call 951-737-3350

Page 618 of 888 ends

RESERVE
for 2025
NOW!

GOOD MORNING
CORONA
Eagle Glen Golf Club
1800 Eagle Glen Pkwy.

Corona, CA 92883
Doors Open 6:30am

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES
Platinum Sponsor $4500
VIP seating (table of 10)
Mic time (up to 3 minutes)
Promo items placed on guest tables
Sponsor provided 30-second video
Company logo on event materials
Recognition at event as Platinum Sponsor
6' Exhibitor table (preferred placement)
Gold Sponsor $2750
VIP seating (table of 10)
Company logo on event materials
Recognition at event as Gold Sponsor
6' Exhibitor table (preferred placement)
Silver Sponsor $1750
Reserved seating for 5
Company logo on event materials
Recognition at event as Silver Sponsor
6' Exhibitor table
Exhibitor Space $450
Includes 6' table and linens
Entry for 2 people
Individual Tickets for Members $40
Must pre-register with payment Monday prior
to event
$50 after Monday prior/walk-in
Individual Tickets for Non- Members $75
Pre-register and/or walk-in
Early registration highly recommended

CONTRACT/PAYMENT
Name:__________________________________
Company:______________________________
Phone:_________________________________
Email:__________________________________
CC#____________________________________
Exp:_______________ CCV:_____________
Signature:______________________________
Networking - Exhibitors
Breakfast - Updates - Community
Register at:
www.mychamber.org
Information:
(951) 737-3350
[email protected]

INDIVIDUAL TICKETS
Good Morning, CORONA is a monthly meeting dedicated to keeping businesses up to date on topics of interest. This program is typically held at Eagle Glen Golf Club (1800 Eagle Glen Pkwy., 92883, but subject to change) and is a great opportunity to meet people across a variety of industries. A light breakfast is included. Sponsorships are not exclusive, but every effort will be made to not book competing companies/industries unless there's a special theme. Payment secures your sponsorship and is due within 30 days of signing this contract or upon securing if less than 30 days before event. No refunds provided on sponsorships or individual tickets.

Total Amount :__________________________

Page 619 of 888 ends

DATE: 10/16/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Office of the City Manager
2024-96

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

RESULTS OF THE 2024 COMMUNITY SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to receive and comment on the results of the 2024 Community Survey. The survey report provides the perception of 1,236 randomly sampled residents on 24 performance indicators from the City’s Strategic Plan. Compared with the 2023 Annual Community Survey, residents’ perceptions of the City of Corona remained consistent in most categories, with significant improvement on 5 indicators and a decrease on one indicator.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council receive and file the 2024 Community Survey.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The City of Corona Strategic Plan includes 24 performance indicators related to resident perceptions of the City and its services. These perceptions are gathered in an annual survey to measure progress in achieving the strategic plan's goals and objectives.

The City began its efforts in 2022, when the City contracted with the National Research Center at Polco to utilize their National Community Survey (NCS) for a robust scientific survey to gather and benchmark resident perception data. 714 residents participated in

Page 620 of 888 ends

the 2022. In 2023, City staff developed and conducted a statistically valid, representative survey methodology, based on the NCS model, that could be implemented for the City’s annual Community Survey. 972 residents participated in the 2023 survey.

ANALYSIS:

The 2024 Community Survey was developed and distributed by the City of Corona. The survey contained only the specific perception questions associated with the City's Strategic Plan to increase participation rates and decrease the participants' time burden.

A random sample of 1400 residences in each of the five districts (7000 total) were invited to participate in the survey. The survey was conducted between June 25th and September 30th, 2024. The survey was distributed by email invitation and with a mailed paper survey. The email list was compiled using utility, animal license, and recreation center data. The survey was available in English and Spanish. All survey invitations included a unique link and QR code to prevent a respondent from participating more than once. Four follow-up email invitations were sent to encourage participation before a printed version of the survey was distributed. Participants who completed the paper survey were verified as not having completed the online survey, and then their responses were entered into the dataset by staff. A post-survey geographical analysis was conducted to ensure the respondents were dispersed throughout each district and the city.

Of the 7,000 households invited to participate, 1,236 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 17.6%. This response rate has a 95% confidence level that the survey findings represent the entire population, within a margin of error of plus or minus

2.7 percentage points around any given percent reported. The 2024 sample demographic profile and housing characteristics are like the 2022 NCS and 2023 Annual Community Survey (ACS) samples. A detailed description of the participant demographics is contained in section 2.4 of the report.

The survey results are discussed in sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the report. Compared with the 2023 ACS, residents' perceptions of the City of Corona slightly improved across almost all categories. The biggest improvements were in residents' perceptions regarding Corona as a place to raise children, the variety and frequency of community events, neighborhood safety, and Corona’s overall direction. Some areas that showed the least improvement were the availability of paths and walking trails, City parks, and overall sense of place. There was no difference in resident’s perception of the city’s efforts to reduce homelessness
The staff report's summary table shows the percentage of respondents scoring the items as “excellent” or “good” compared to the 2023 ACS results. The survey report analyzes each question further.

Sound Infrastructure

Page 621 of 888 ends

Safe Community
Sense of Place
High Performing Government
The survey was also made available online for anyone who wanted to participate. It was promoted on the City’s social media channels and website during the same timeframe as the representative sample. 640 responses were received through this open participation process. These responses are analyzed separately from the scientific sample in section 7 of the report. Overall, the open survey responses were significantly more negative than the random survey responses, except for their perception of recommending Corona as a place to live and the City’s efforts to reduce homelessness.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact associated with receiving the results of the 2024 Community Survey.

Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 2022 Availability of paths and walking trails 62% 64% 57%
City parks 74% 75% 64%
Recreation centers or facilities 65% 66% 59%
Bike lanes 59% 60% 50%
Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 2022 Public safety efforts 69% 67% 59%
Do you feel safe in your neighborhood during the day 84% 80% 86% City’s efforts to reduce homelessness 38% 38% 25%
Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 2022 Corona as a place to live 83% 81% 82%
Corona as a place to raise children 83% 79% 77%
Sense of community 59% 62% 54%
Recommend living in Corona to someone who asks 87% 88% 80% Overall image or reputation of Corona 69% 69% 56%
Overall appearance of Corona 64% 64% 50%
Cleanliness of Corona 59% 60% 50%
Openness and acceptance 75% 74% 58%
Places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect 51% 49% 37% Variety and frequency of community events 53% 49% 39%
Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 2022 The value of services for the taxes paid to Corona 47% 48% 42% The overall direction that Corona is taking 59% 56% 51% Overall confidence in Corona government 51% 51% 38%
Treating all residents fairly 64% 65% 50%
Quality of the services provided by the City of Corona 68% 65% 61%

Page 622 of 888 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action is to receive a report on the results of the City’s annual Community Survey and there is no possibility that approving this project will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: AMINAH MEARS, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER REVIEWED BY: JUSTIN TUCKER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – 2024 Annual Community Survey Report

Page 623 of 888 ends

2024 Community
Survey
Justin Tucker
Assistant City Manager

Page 624 of 888 ends

• 24 questions from four elements of the Strategic Plan • Sound Infrastructure
• Safe Community
• Sense of Place
• High Performing Government
• Results compared to the 2023 Annual Community Survey
• Survey available in English and Spanish
2 2024 Community Survey

Page 625 of 888 ends

Random Sample Survey
• 7000 Households (1400 per district)
• June 25th – Sept 30th, 2024
• Email invitation (4x) then by mail
• 1,236 completed surveys
• 17.6% response rate
• 2.7% margin of error
Open Participation Survey
• Publicized on City Website and Social media
• 640 responses
3 2024 Community Survey

Page 626 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Highlights
4 27% increase in survey participation
Consistent positive sentiment in key
areas
Significant changes
• Neighborhood safety
• Corona as a place to raise children
• Sense of Community
• The variety and frequency of community
events
• Corona’s overall direction
• Quality of services

Page 627 of 888 ends

Respondent Demographics
5 2024 2023 2022
Age 18-34
35-54
55+
Unknown
5%
34%
47%
14%
7%
43%
50%
-
6%
33%
61%
-
Sex Man
Woman
Prefer not to Say/Other
41%
56%
3%
39%
58%
3%
44%
56%
-
District 1
2 3
4 5
Unknown
13%
13%
14%
17%
18%
25%
17%
17%
22%
20%
23%
-
17%
15%
19%
24%
24%
-
Hispanic origin Yes
No
Unknown
28%
58%
14%
33%
67%
-
24%
76%
Housing Type Attached
Detached
Unknown
9%
76%
15%
13%
87%
-
22%
78%

Page 628 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Sound Infrastructure
6 Percent "Excellent" or "Good" 2024 2023 2022
Availability of paths and walking trails 62% 64% 57%
City parks 74% 75% 64%
Recreation centers or facilities 65% 66% 59%
Bike lanes 59% 60% 50%

Page 629 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Safe Community
7 Percent "Excellent" or "Good" 2024 2023 2022
Public safety efforts 69% 67% 59%
Do you feel safe in your neighborhood during the day 84% 80% 86% City’s efforts to reduce homelessness 38% 38% 25%
How prepared are you for an emergency 19% 18% 19%

Page 630 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Sense of Place
8 Percent "Excellent" or "Good" 2024 2023 2022
Corona as a place to live 83% 84% 82%
Corona as a place to raise children 83% 79% 77%
Sense of community 59% 62% 54%
Recommend living in Corona to someone who asks 87% 88% 80% Overall image or reputation of Corona 69% 69% 56%
Overall appearance of Corona 64% 64% 50%
Cleanliness of Corona 59% 60% 50%
Openness and acceptance 75% 74% 58%
Places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect 51% 49% 37% Variety and frequency of community events 53% 49% 39%
Have volunteered in past year 24% 25% 22%

Page 631 of 888 ends

City of Corona
High Performing Government
9 Percent "Excellent" or "Good" 2024 2023 2022
The value of services for the taxes paid to Corona 47% 48% 42% The overall direction that Corona is taking 59% 56% 51% Overall confidence in Corona government 51% 51% 38%
Treating all residents fairly 64% 65% 50%
Quality of the services provided by the City of Corona 68% 65% 61%

Page 632 of 888 ends

10 • Robust process to hear from a representative sample of residents about key issues over time.
• Open survey results (n=640) were 10% more negative than the results from the random sample (n=1,236).
• Consistent positive sentiment in key areas.
• Anticipate that current efforts will not show in perception data for some time.

Conclusions

Page 633 of 888 ends

Questions?

Page 634 of 888 ends

2024
Community Survey 2024 Results

Page 635 of 888 ends

1 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 2 2 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 3

2.1 Survey Questions ...................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Sample Selection...................................................................................................... 3

2.3 Conducting the Survey............................................................................................ 3

2.4 Demographics.......................................................................................................... 3

2.5 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 5 3 Sound Infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 6

3.1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Individual Questions................................................................................................. 6 4 Safe Community............................................................................................................... 9

4.1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 9

4.2 Individual Questions................................................................................................. 9 5 Sense of Place .................................................................................................................12

5.1 Summary ..................................................................................................................12

5.2 Individual Questions................................................................................................13 6 High Performing Government.........................................................................................18

6.1 Summary ..................................................................................................................18

6.2 Individual Questions................................................................................................19 7 Open Survey response ....................................................................................................21

Page 636 of 888 ends

2 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Corona conducts an annual Community Survey to better understand community priorities, identify areas for improvement, and assess resident perceptions regarding city services and community characteristics. Thie 2024 survey utilized the same methodology and questions as the 2023 survey, which was entirely created, distributed, and analyzed by the City of Corona.

In total, 1,236 residents responded to the 2024 survey invitation, an 27% increase in participants compared to the 2023 survey. Residents were asked 24 questions, corresponding to the City's Strategic Plan metrics. Compared with 2023, residents' perceptions of the City of Corona show small changes, mostly within the margin of error. The areas that show statistically significant positive changes are increased perceptions of safety in the respondent’s neighborhood, Corona as a place to raise children, the variety and frequency of community events, the overall direction Corona is taking, and the quality of services offered by the City. The single statistically significant decease in perception was a feeling a sense of community in the City. Overall, the results show consistent positive perception of the City and City services.

Page 637 of 888 ends

3 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
2 METHODS

2.1 SURVEY QUESTIONS
The 2024 Community Survey utilized the same questions, as the 2023 Community Survey.

The goal of the survey is to provide an annual snapshot of resident opinions that can be compared year over year, to identify potential issues and areas of improvement, and to recognize areas of success.

2.2 SAMPLE SELECTION
The sample selection method remained unchanged from 2023. All addresses classified as single-family or multi-family residences in the City of Corona's geodatabase were used to create a list of potential survey participants. 1,400 residences were randomly selected per district for a total of 7000 randomly selected households throughout the city.

A distribution list was created by combining the randomly selected households with email contact information obtained from utility accounts’ data.

2.3 CONDUCTING THE SURVEY
The survey was conducted between June 25th and September 23rd, 2024. The survey
was distributed first by email invitation and second by mailed paper survey. The email list was compiled using data from utility accounts. All surveys included a unique link and QR code to prevent a respondent from participating more than once. Four follow-up emails were sent to encourage participation before a printed version of the survey was distributed. Participants who completed the paper survey were verified as not having completed the online survey, and then their responses were entered into the dataset by staff.

The survey was also available for open participation on the City's website. Responses were collected separately to maintain the integrity of the randomly generated scientific sample. The results of the open response sample are reported separately and compared to the scientific sample at the end of the report. Open survey responses tend to be more negative than those conducted using a controlled sampling procedure.

2.4 DEMOGRAPHICS

Page 638 of 888 ends

4 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
A total of 1236 residents participated in the 2024 survey, yielding a response rate of

17.6% and a margin of error of 2.7%. In comparison, the 2023 survey yielded 972 completed surveys for a response rate of 13.8% and a margin of error of 3.1%.

The following table provides a demographic comparison of survey respondents from the 2024 Community Survey, the 2023 Community Survey, and the demographic profile derived from Census 2020 and American Community Survey 2023 data. 2024
Community
Survey
Sample
2023
Community
Survey
Sample
Census
Bureau
Data
Age 18-34 5% 7% 23%
35-54 34% 43% 28%
55+ 47% 50% 23%
Unknown 14% - -
District 1 13% 17% 19%
2 13% 17% 21%
3 14% 22% 17%
4 17% 20% 21%
5 18% 23% 22%
Unknown 25% - -
Hispanic origin Yes 28% 33% 47%
No 58% 67% 53%
Unknown 14% - -
Housing Tenure Own 76% 93% 66%
Rent 9% 7% 34%
Unknown 15% - -
Housing Type Attached 9% 13% 40%
Detached 76% 87% 60%
Unknown 15% - -
Race and
Hispanic Origin
Not White
Alone
31% 33% 66%
White alone,
not Hispanic
or Latino
57% 67% 32%
Unknown 12% - -
Sex Man 41% 39% 50
Woman 56% 58% 50%
Prefer not to
Say/Other
3% 3% -
Sex/Age Man 18-34 3% 2% 18%
Man 35-54 14% 15% 18%
Man 55+ 22% 21% 14%
Woman 18-34 3% 5% 16%
Woman 35-54 18% 26% 19%
Woman 55+ 23% 27% 15%

Page 639 of 888 ends

5 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
Other/Prefer
not to Say 18-
34 0% 0% -
Other/Prefer
not to Say 35-
54 1% 2% -
Other/Prefer
not to Say
55+
2% 2% -
Unknown 14% - --
Overall, the 2024 participants' demographic and housing characteristics are like those of the 2023 Community Survey; however, most categories now include an “Unknown” classification for those responses that were left blank by participants.

Self-Description Participation
Percentage
Census Bureau
percentage
White alone 57% 40%
White and another race 5% -
Black or African American 4.9% 6.0%
Asian 9.1% 12%
American Indian and Alaska Native 1.8% 1.5%
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 0.6% 0.4%
Other/Prefer not to say 21.7% -

2.5 DATA ANALYSIS
The results of the 2024 survey are reported directly and can be best understood in the context of their relationship to the 2023 results. The results are organized to align with the goals in the City's Strategic Plan. Using the metrics from the Strategic Plan and the reporting style of the previous community surveys, each question is reported as the percent of respondents answering "good" or "excellent", then the 2023 responses are compared with the 2024 responses, with a percent change noted in a separate column.

Page 640 of 888 ends

6 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
3 SOUND INFRASTRUCTURE
Sustain high-quality service delivery by
investing in public infrastructure,
including parks, buildings, equipment,
roads, and technology

3.1 SUMMARY
Residents were asked four questions that directly addressed performance indicators for the Sound Infrastructure goal of the City's Strategic Plan. These questions address the availability of paths and trails, the overall quality of city parks, the availability of recreation centers and facilities, and bike lanes.

Overall, the “Excellent” and “Good” responses for the questions in this category have decreased between 1% and 2%.

3.2 INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS
For the first questions in this category, residents were asked to rate the availability of paths and walking trails as part of a multi-topic question. There was a 2% increase in "excellent" responses compared to last year and a 4% decrease in "good" responses.

The "fair" responses remained similar, with both “Fair” and “Poor” responses increasing by 1%.

Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 Difference Availability of paths and walking trails 62% 64% -2%
City parks 74% 75% -1%
Recreation centers or facilities 65% 66% -1%
Bike lanes 59% 60% -1%

Page 641 of 888 ends

7 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
1077 participants provided answers to this question.

The second question in this category, the first topic of a two-topic question, asked the residents to rate city parks. Compared to last year, there was no change in the "excellent" responses and a 2% decrease in the "good" responses. The "fair" responses increased by 2%, and the "poor" responses decreased by 1%. There were 1113 responses for this question.

The third question in this category was asked as the second part of the two-topic question mentioned in the "city parks" category. The question asked residents to rate recreation centers and facilities. Compared to last year, the overall changes were negligible, and when rounded up, there was only a slight 1% decrease in “Poor”

Page 642 of 888 ends

8 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
responses, with all the other categories showing less than .5% change. This question received 812 responses.

The last question in this category asked residents to rate bike lanes as part of a multitopic question. There was a 1% increase in "excellent" responses and a 3% decrease in "good" responses. The "fair "responses decreased by 1%, and the poor responses remained the same. Overall, there were 930 responses for this question.

Page 643 of 888 ends

9 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
4 SAFE COMMUNITY
Protect our quality of life by ensuring the
community is safe and clean.1"

4.1 SUMMARY
Four questions were asked to address performance under this goal. Only two questions, which address public safety and the City's efforts to reduce homelessness, are included in the pie chart above. The other two questions, which use a different scale and are explained below, address the level of safety in the neighborhood during the day and the level of preparedness for an emergency.

Two of the questions show an improvement in “excellent” and “good” responses, while the third question remains unchanged.

4.2 INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS
The first question in this category asked residents to rate public safety efforts as part of a multi-topic question. There was a 2% increase in "excellent" responses and a 1% decrease in "good" responses. The "fair" responses decreased by 2%, and the "poor" responses remained unchanged. This question received 1094 responses. 1 City of Corona Strategic Plan 2021-2026
Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 Difference Public safety efforts 69% 67% 2%
Do you feel safe in your neighborhood during the day 84% 80% 4% City’s efforts to reduce homelessness 38% 38% 0%

Page 644 of 888 ends

10 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The second question asked residents, "Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel in your neighborhood during the day." Compared to 2023, there was a 2% increase for those who feel “very safe” and a 1% increase in those who feel “somewhat safe”. There was a 6% decrease in those who felt "somewhat unsafe" and a 6% increase in those who felt very unsafe. Those who feel "neither safe nor unsafe" decreased by 4%. Overall, there were 1124 answers to this question.

The third question on this topic was also part of a multi-topic question, and residents were asked to rate the city's efforts to reduce homelessness. The “excellent” and “good” responses remained the same, while fair responses increased by 1% and "poor" responses decreased by 1%. 953 participants answered this question.

Page 645 of 888 ends

11 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The last question in this category asked residents, "How prepared, if at all, do you feel you are in the event of an emergency?" There was a 1% increase in those who feel “very prepared” and those who feel “not at all prepared.” Those who are “somewhat prepared” decreased by 2%. 1116 participants answered this question.

Page 646 of 888 ends

12 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
5 SENSE OF PLACE
"Build community through
celebrating our rich heritage,
increasing access to recreational
and cultural activities, and improving
the relationship between the City
and residents2"

5.1 SUMMARY
In 2023, the residents were asked ten questions about performance indicators for the "Sense of Place: goal of the City's Strategic Plan.

Five questions improved between 1% and 4%, three declined between 1% and 3%, and two remained unchanged.
2 City of Corona Strategic Plan 2021-2026
Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 Difference Corona as a place to live 83% 81% 2%
Corona as a place to raise children 83% 79% 4%
Sense of community 59% 62% -3%
Recommend living in Corona to someone who asks 87% 88% -1% Overall image or reputation of Corona 69% 69% 0%
Overall appearance of Corona 64% 64% 0%
Cleanliness of Corona 59% 60% -1%
Openness and acceptance 75% 74% 1%
Places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect 51% 49% 2% Variety and frequency of community events 53% 49% 4%

Page 647 of 888 ends

13 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

5.2 INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS
The survey's first question contained three elements: It asked the participants to rate Corona as a place to live, a place to raise children, and a place with a sense of community.

For rating Corona as a place to live," there was a 4% increase in “excellent” responses, a 1% increase in “poor” responses, and a 5% decrease in “good” responses. The percentage of “fair” responses was unchanged compared to 2023. The total number of responses received for this question was 1150.

The second part of the question asked residents to rate "Corona as a place to raise children". There was a 5% Increase in "excellent" responses and a 3% decrease in "good" responses. The "fair responses" decreased by 3%, while "poor" responses increased by 1%. There were 1055 responses to this question.

Page 648 of 888 ends

14 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
Residents were asked to rate their sense of community for the third part of the question.

There was a 1% increase in "excellent" responses and a 3% decrease in "good" responses. Both “fair” and “poor” responses increased by 2% each. There were 1112 responses to this question.

The next question asked respondents how likely or unlikely they are to "recommend living in Corona to someone who asks." Compared to 2023, there was a 3% increase in the “excellent” category and a 5% decrease in the “good” category. The negative responses of "somewhat unlikely" and "very Unlikely" increased by 1% and 2%, respectively. The total number of responses received to this question was 1112.

Page 649 of 888 ends

15 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The next question in this category asked residents to "rate Corona's overall image and reputation." Compared to last year, the "excellent" category improved by 2%; however, the “good” category decreased by 3%. The “fair” responses decreased by 1%, and the “poor" responses increased by 1%. There were 1141 responses for this question.

The next question assessing the "sense of place" was a multiple-part question that asked residents to rate Corona's overall appearance, cleanliness, and community openness and acceptance toward people of diverse backgrounds.

The "overall appearance" received a 3% increase in “excellent” responses and a 2% decrease in “good” responses. The "fair" rating increased by 1% and the "poor" rating decreased by 1%. There were 1147 responses for this question.

Page 650 of 888 ends

16 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The "cleanliness" rating increased by 1% in the “excellent” category and decreased by 2% in the “good” category. The "fair" responses increased by 2%, and the "poor" responses decreased by 1%. There were 1144 responses for this question.

When asked to rate the community's acceptance of people of diverse backgrounds, there was a 3% increase in the "excellent" category and a 2% decrease in the “good” category. The “poor” category decreased by 1%, while the “fair” category remained the same. There were 1036 responses to this question.

Residents were asked to rate the following in the Corona Community: places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect with friends, neighbors and family and the variety and frequency of community events.

Page 651 of 888 ends

17 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
There was an increase of 2% in the "excellent" category for places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect with others and 1% in the "good" category for places to recreate, socialize, meet, and connect with others. The responses in the “fair” category decreased by 2%, and the responses in the “poor” category remained the same. There were 1030 responses for this question.

The "variety and frequency of community events" showed a 1% increase in the "excellent" responses and a 4% increase in the "good" responses and decreased by 4% in the "fair" responses and by 1% in the "poor" responses. There were 984 responses to this question.

Finally, residents were asked, "Have you volunteered your time to some group/activity in Corona in the last 12 months?" This question allowed for Yes/No responses and showed

Page 652 of 888 ends

18 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
a 1% decrease in positive responses and a 1% increase in negative responses. There were 1149 responses for this question.
6 HIGH PERFORMING GOVERNMENT
Improve the efficiency of the City's services
to bring government into the 21st century.

6.1 SUMMARY
Five questions aligned with the performance indicators for the "High Performing Government" goal of the City's strategic plan. All these questions showed an improvement in the positive responses compared to last year's survey.

Page 653 of 888 ends

19 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

6.2 INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS
The first question in this category had four parts. The residents were asked to rate the value of services for the taxes paid to Corona, the overall direction Corona is taking, their confidence in the Corona Government, and whether all residents are treated fairly.

When asked to rate the value of services for taxes paid, the responses show a 1% improvement in "excellent" responses and a 2% decline in "good" responses. The fair responses decreased by 1%, and the "poor" responses increased by 2%. There were 1080 responses for this question.

The next part of this question, which addresses Corona's overall direction, saw a 4% improvement in the "excellent" category and a 1% decline in the "good" category. The "fair "responses decreased by 4%, and the "poor" responses increased by 1%. There were 1047 responses for this question.

Change in "Excellent" and "Good" responses 2024 2023 Difference The value of services for the taxes paid to Corona 47% 48% -1% The overall direction that Corona is taking 59% 56% 3%
Overall confidence in Corona government 51% 51% 0%
Treating all residents fairly 64% 65% -1%
Quality of the services provided by the City of Corona? 68% 65% 3%

Page 654 of 888 ends

20 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The third portion of this question asked residents to rate their "overall confidence in Corona government". There was a 2% increase in "excellent" responses and a 3% reduction in “good” responses. The "fair" responses decreased by 2%, and the "poor" responses increased by 2%. There were 1047 responses for this question.

The last part of this question asked residents to rate whether all residents are treated fairly. The "excellent" responses increased by 2%, while the "good" responses decreased by 2%. "Fair" responses decreased by 2%, while "poor" responses increased by 1%. There were 978 responses for this question.

Page 655 of 888 ends

21 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS
The last question in this category asked residents, "Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by the City?” Both the “excellent” and “good” categories increased by 2% and 1%, respectively, while there was a 4% decrease in "fair" responses and a 1% increase in "poor" responses. There were 1092 responses for this question.
7 OPEN SURVEY RESPONSE
The survey was also posted on the City's website for open participation. The 640 responses received were recorded separately from the random survey. The open survey results are detailed below compared to the random survey results. Overall, the open survey responses were more negative than the random ones.

Page 656 of 888 ends

22 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 657 of 888 ends

23 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 658 of 888 ends

24 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 659 of 888 ends

25 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 660 of 888 ends

26 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 661 of 888 ends

27 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 662 of 888 ends

28 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 663 of 888 ends

29 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 664 of 888 ends

30 | Page
COMMUNITY SURVEY 2024 RESULTS

Page 665 of 888 ends

Volunteer Program
Update
Madelyne Black
Volunteer Program Coordinator
10/16/2024 Page 666 of 888
The Ask
That the City Council receive an annual update on the Volunteer Program opportunities and participation.
2

Page 667 of 888 ends

How Can I Volunteer
for the City?
I want to help!
Registration software such as CivicRec and Qualtrics make accessing event details and registration easy!
Online Referrals
Have an idea about a current program or something we haven’t thought about? Let’s chat! You can find me at City Hall in the Community Services Department.

Walk in
Book Cleaning Crew
You can reach me at (951) 736-2377 or
[email protected]
Phone and Email
3

Page 668 of 888 ends

Volunteer Referrals At-a-Glance
613 Referrals!
9/2023 - 8/2024
263 Referrals
Corona Police & Fire
Department
123 Referrals
Community Services
Library, Parks, Recreation, and Sports
300 Referrals
Community Cleanups
& Neighborhood Cleanup Kits
195 Referrals
Other:

Write in Requests
4

Page 669 of 888 ends

Volunteer Orientations
Community Services Orientation
Community Services Department
Corona’s Animal Services and Shelter
Direct Referrals for Unique Opportunities
5

Page 670 of 888 ends

Volunteers in City Facilities
Book Cleaning Crew, Friends of the Library,
Corona Adult Literacy Services
Corona Public
Library
Exercise Classes, Senior Nutrition, Computer
Classes
Corona Senior
Center
Brown Bag Grocery Distribution, Greeter,
Adaptive Services
Circle City
Center
Circle City Sports offers Youth Basketball,
Indoor Soccer, and Youth Volleyball
Youth Sports
Book Cleaning Crew
Senior Nutrition
Exercise Class - Longevity Stick
Youth Sports - Basketball
6

Page 671 of 888 ends

Volunteers in City Facilities
Code Enforcement Sign Pullers, Office Aides
Planning and
Development
Adoption Services, Animal Socialization, and
Kennel Assistance
Corona Animal
Shelter
Management Services, Archival Internships,
Risk Management
Internships
Have an idea? Let’s chat about it!
And More!
Senior Center – Computer Class
Corona Animal Services - Animal Socialization Senior Nutrition Piano Player Code Enforcement
7

Page 672 of 888 ends

City Volunteers in Parks and More!
10 Events a Year
Corona Beautiful
Community Cleanups
8 Active Partnerships
Adopt a Park
32 Volunteer Participants
Guided Hikes and
Park Ambassadors
Have an idea for Corona’s Parks and open
spaces?
Let’s chat about it!
Closed Group
Requests
Sixth Street Cleanup
Patria Church - Village Park
Trail Guides - Tarrah Massey & Diane Thomas
Local Companies giving back!
8

Page 673 of 888 ends

Community Services Department - Statistical Reports
Long Term Volunteer Opportunities
Corona Loves to Volunteer!
9

Page 674 of 888 ends

Outreach and Participation
10

Page 675 of 888 ends

Recognition
Caroline Gregory – Senior Center, Volunteer of the Year “No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever
wasted.”
- Aesop
11

Page 676 of 888 ends

What are we doing?
Recognition Survey and Strategies
• Thanking our volunteers for their daily contributions! • Changing our annual Recognition event to be earlier in the year. • Hosting smaller, less formal events at each volunteer facility. • Annual Volunteer Recognition Event which includes a sit-down dinner & entertainment!
12

Page 677 of 888 ends

Looking Forward
2025
Programs going strong
We are here to support our staff and the community by providing an easy way to access opportunities, let us know how to improve! Developing Opportunities
Have an idea? Let’s hear it!
Corona Beautiful Community Cleanups, Adopt a Park, Guided Hikes, Library Services, and more!
Kimbell Family – Neighborhood Cleanup Kits

Page 678 of 888 ends

Page 679 of 888 ends

Thank you!
15 $725,125*

Page 680 of 888 ends

City of Corona
Questions?
Madelyne Black
Program Coordinator
(951) 736-2377
[email protected]

Page 681 of 888 ends

62,000 square foot building
7,034 Library card holders added in FY 2024
102,819 total Corona Public Library cardholders
221,680 patron visits
10,744 reference questions answered
1,382 programs with 50,350 attendees
Total Circulation of 397,511 items
6,547 Holds Filled
2,060 ZipBooks ordered
116,690 visits to the webpage
1,064,548 YouTube, Facebook, Instagram
views/impressions
Public Internet access at multiple terminals with
over 27,427 uses
Website with direct access from home to online
catalog and databases
1,033 E-Cards issued during FY 2024
Library wide free Wi-Fi usage at 29,574 sessions
Staff of 16 full-time and 36 part-time employees
(33 fte)
Friends of the Library provided over $99,600 for
National Library Week, Summer at Your Library, author events, library materials, and matching Adopt-A-Book funds.

CORONA PUBLIC

LIBRARY
Fast Facts-FY 2024
Programming and Services
On the Go
Weekly Park outings; Summer Kids Camp Partnership;
Community Outreach; School Site Visits; Library Tours
Teen Services
Teen Advisory Council; Math Tutoring; Volunteer
Opportunities; monthly programs
Bi Monthly & Monthly Programs and Services included:

Bilingual Storytimes: Arabic & Spanish
StoryWalk® at Mountain Gate Park
Book Clubs: Fiction & Vets Connect
Read to a Dog
Annual & Ongoing Programs and Services included:

Corona Adult & Family Literacy Services
One-on-One/Group Tutoring; CNUSD Adult School ESL
Classes; Computer Basics Classes; Tutor/Learner
Workshops; Literacy Outreach events
Career Online High School
Veterans Connect @ Your Library
Summer at Your Library
Summer Reading Challenge; SAYL Events & Activities;
Teen + Adult volunteer opportunities, Finishers Party
Youth Reading Programs
1,000 Books Before Kindergarten; Read Across
America; In-N-Out Cover to Cover; Star Wars Reads
Community Events
National Library Week; Diversity in Action (DÍA), TAC
Murder Mystery, Halloween Storytime, Star Wars
Storytime; Free Comic Book Day
Community Partnership Programs included:

Corona-Norco Unified School District
Adult School classes, School Library Luncheon, History
Day Tour, Head Start Holiday, school site visits & tours Riverside County Office of Education
Head Start Holiday
Paws of Love
Read to a Dog
Corona Art Association
Adaptive Art Class
Children’s Dental FunZone
Dental Month Storytime
Corona Genealogical Society
Monthly Speaker, Weekly Genealogy Workshops
Haunted History Podcast
Spirits & Spirits
VISIT US AT:
650 South Main Street, Corona, CA 92882
951-736-2381 I www.coronaca.gov/library
New Programs and Services this year:

Created a Spanish lanuguage collection for Teens. Refreshed the On the Go mobile library collection. Upgrated the study carrels in the adult area. Added new volunteer positions for teens and adults with Special Needs. Brought back Adaptive Story Hour and Bilingual storytimes, and created new monthly programs for
families, teens, and adults. Weekly Programs and Services included:

Corona Adaptive
Adaptive Story Hour; Busy Boxes; Adaptive Art Class
Family Literacy Program
Preschool Storytime (ages3-5); Little Ones Storytime
(ages 0-24 months); Toddler Storytime (ages 18-36
months); Homework Center; Reading Strategies; Play
Café (caregivers w/ 0-5yrs); STEM for Little Twigs
Maker Exchange
Open Hours for ages 10-Adult; Spooky STEM; Space
Science

Page 682 of 888 ends

Oct. 11th
7pm-9pm
Corona Public Library
Community Room
R.I.P
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this session, please contact the ADA coordinator at (951) 736-2266.

Corona Public Library
650 S. Main St.
951-736-2384
www.CoronaCA.gov/Library
CARVE
18+
Ages
Coffee
Get in the Halloween
spirit with free pumpkin
carving, coffee, fall treats
and a special movie
presentation of: The
Mummy (1999)
Program is free and all materials are provided. No
registration required, but space is limited. Coffee is
generously provided by Starbucks.

Page 683 of 888 ends

11 de oct
7pm-9pm
R.I.P
En cumplimiento con la Acta para Estadounidenses con
Discapacidades, si necesita asistencia especial para participar en este evento, comuníquese con el Coordinador de la ADA al (951) 736-2266
Corona Public Library
650 S. Main St.
951-736-2384
www.CoronaCA.gov/Library
Calabazas
Biblioteca Pública de Corona Cuarto de Comunidad
18+
Edades
café
¡Demuestre su espíritu de
Halloween participando en
el tallado de calabazas, y
disfrutando de café,
delicias de otoño y una
presentación especial de
la película: La Momia
(1999).

Este programa es gratuito y se proporcionan
todos los materiales. No es necesario registrarse,
pero el espacio es limitado. El café será
proporcionado generosamente por Starbucks.
y

Page 684 of 888 ends

DATE: 10/16/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2024-79

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

PRECISE PLAN 2023-0007 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE SITE PLAN,

ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER PHYSICAL FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION, 3,725-SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE, AND A 4,110-SQUARE-FOOT AUTOMATED CARWASH TUNNEL ON 1.40 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 2ND STREET, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET WEST OF BUENA VISTA AVENUE IN THE C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE (APPLICANT: GREENS DEVELOPMENT) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to affirm the decision by the Planning and Housing Commission in granting Precise Plan 2023-0007 (PP2023-0007) to establish automobile service related uses consisting of a gas station, convenience store, and a self-service car wash on 1.40 acres in the C-3 (General Commercial) zone. The project site is located at the northeast corner of 2nd Street and the Interstate 91 on ramp, west of Buena Vista Avenue.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Take no action, thereby affirming the Planning and Housing Commission’s action to adopt the Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Plan and Resolution No. 2641 GRANTING PP2023-

Page 685 of 888 ends

0007, based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval.

OR
b. Set the item for review at a subsequent meeting.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Greens Development is proposing to develop two adjoining parcels that have a combined acreage of 1.40 acres for commercial purposes. The zoning of the project site is C-3, which allows for gas stations and convenience stores. The project also includes a carwash, which is allowed by a conditional use permit and reviewed separately as Conditional Use Permit 2024-0006 (CUP2024-0006). The Planning and Housing Commission at its meeting on September 23, 2024, approved PP2023-0007.

ANALYSIS:

The project includes:
 Gas station with five double-sided fuel pumps (10 fuel pumps total)  3,725-square-foot convenience store
 4,110-square-foot automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls (CUP2024- 0006)
The development is designed per the C-3 zone development standards established in Chapter 17.33 of the Corona Municipal Code (CMC). The gas station and carwash facility also conform to additional standards in Chapter 17.72 of the CMC, which contain supplemental standards applicable to automotive related uses.

Site Plan
The project site is surrounded by the SR-91 freeway on-ramp to the north and west, and 2 nd Street to the south. The layout of the development is dictated by the site’s irregular shape, which tapers into an acute corner at the east end of the site. The carwash facility is proposed on the western and widest portion of the site. The convenience store and a water quality retention basin are proposed on the eastern portion and the gas station is situated within the middle portion of the site. The development has sixteen (16) parking spaces and a trash enclosure which are to be shared among the tenants within the development. Vehicular access to the site is provided from 2nd Street via two driveways proposed at the site’s south perimeter.

Carwash Facility. The carwash facility is a self-service facility consisting of a 130-foot long automated carwash tunnel and 11 covered self-serve vacuum stalls. Vehicle access into the tunnel is facilitated by a drive-through lane that splits into two lanes at the payment kiosks and merges into a single lane before the entrance into the tunnel.

Gas Station. The gas station is comprised of a gas canopy that will provide shade over five double-sided fuel pumps. In total, there will be 10 fueling positions.

Page 686 of 888 ends

Convenience Store. Customer entrance into the convenience store is located at the west elevation. Additional entrances for employees and deliveries are located on the east elevation. A 12’ x 25’ loading space for the convenience store is provided at the north perimeter of the site, near the convenience store.

Parking
The project requires 16 parking spaces per the requirements in the CMC’s Parking Ordinance (Chapter 17.76). The project is capable of providing the 16 spaces plus one loading space. The 16 parking spaces are in addition to the 11 vacuum stalls.

Table 1: Parking Summary
Use Gross
Square
Footage
Net Square
Footage
(minus
utility room)
Parking
Requirement
per CMC
Chapter 17.76
Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Carwash 4,110 SF 3,957 SF 2 spaces per
carwash stall
2 ---
Gas Station
and
Convenience
Store
3,725 SF 3,500 SF 1 space per
250 SF of floor
area
14 ---
16 16
Elevations
The CMC prescribes no specific architectural style for commercial buildings in the C-3 zone. The applicant is proposing a contemporary architectural style for the project. The buildings feature tower elements, parapet walls with varying heights, metal awnings, and glazed storefronts. The buildings’ primary exterior finish is stucco with splitface block and stone veneer as accent materials. The color palette consists of shades of grey and brown with green as an accent color. The rooftops are designed to accommodate mechanical equipment which will be screened from street view behind parapet walls.

The buildings are approximately 24 to 26 feet in height, which complies with the CMC’s maximum allowable building height limit of 40 feet for the C-3 zone.

Landscaping and Perimeter Fencing
The grounds of the site including the front yard setback area and parking lot will be landscaped with a variety of shrubs. The remote area surrounding the water quality basin will be landscaped with desert and drought tolerant plant materials to discourage trespassing. The project is also required to install dense screen shrubs along the exterior side of the carwash drive-through lane.

Page 687 of 888 ends

All plant materials will be reviewed for full compliance with the CMC’s Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 17.70.

Signage
The applicant proposes to construct one 40-foot-tall freeway sign with an electronic message center at the site’s freeway perimeter and one 15-foot-tall pylon sign at the west corner of the site. Additionally, a six-foot high monument sign advertising gas prices is proposed at the east entrance. Since the monument sign is less than 25 square feet and advertises only gas prices, the sign is allowed by right per California Business and Professional Code § 13531.

All three signs comply with the applicable standards in the Sign Ordinance and are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Parcel Identification Signs
Proposed Sign
Type & Location
Proposed
Sign
Height
Proposed
Sign Area
Proposed
Number of
Tenant
Panels
Complies
with the
CMC?
Freeway sign,
placed at the north
perimeter,
adjacent to SR-91
40 feet 199.83 SF
Electronic
Message
Center
N/A Yes
Pylon sign, placed
at the west corner,
adjacent to 2nd
Street
15 feet 53.50 SF
Static Sign
Area
3 Yes
Gas price sign 6 feet 24.92 SF
Static Sign
Area
N/A Exempted,
per California
Business and
Professional
Code § 13531
Building signage is proposed for the carwash, gas station canopy and convenience store.

Sign permits are required prior to installation and will be reviewed for compliance with the Sign Ordinance regulations at the time of permit review.

Public Improvements

Page 688 of 888 ends

The segment of 2nd Street in front of the project site is a modified secondary four-lane street. The applicant is required to construct the missing public improvements on the north half of 2nd Street adjacent to the project’s frontage. The improvements include the construction of the missing roadway pavement to include two 12-foot-wide travel lanes, a six-foot-wide sidewalk, and a modified landscaped parkway that will vary in width from approximately one foot to five feet. The Development Services Division is requiring the applicant to dedicate a one- to five-foot wide easement to the City for utility and access purposes along the project’s frontage.

In addition, the applicant will be constructing two raised medians with a left-turn pocket on 2nd Street in front of the project site to allow vehicles traveling eastbound to make left turns into the east project driveway. This driveway will allow vehicles to make full turn movements. Vehicles will be restricted to right-in and right-out turn movements at the west project driveway due to the raised medians.

As there is currently no sidewalk on the north side of 2nd Street between Lincoln Avenue and Buena Vista Avenue, the applicant is required to provide pedestrian connectivity that would cross 2
nd Street from the project site. The two options are applicable to the project.  Option One. Construction of a crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd Street and the SR-91 eastbound on-ramp. This option will only occur if the applicant obtains approval from Caltrans for the crosswalk since the crosswalk would require a modification to Caltran’s traffic signals at this intersection.  Option Two. Construction of the missing sidewalk along the north side of 2nd Street from the project site’s easterly limits to Buena Vista Avenue to connect the pedestrian path of travel from the intersection of 2nd Street and Buena Vista Avenue.

If Option One is not attainable within a timely manner and according to the applicant’s construction schedule, the applicant shall construct Option Two. Option Two was also the preferred option by the Planning and Housing Commission.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The applicant paid the application processing fees of $7,940 to cover the cost of the Conditional Use Permit.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the city has prepared an Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) associated with General Plan Amendment 2023-0004, for the project site. The city has determined that the revised project and the Addendum demonstrate that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation measures identified in the previously adopted MND remain substantively

Page 689 of 888 ends

unchanged despite project modifications. The proposed revised project does not raise any new issues or result in impacts not previously analyzed in the prior MND, and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent MND exist.

PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION:

At its meeting of September 23, 2024, the Planning and Housing Commission considered the subject matter and took the following action:

Motion was made, seconded (Longwell/Siqueland) and carried unanimously, with Vice Chair Vernon absent, that the Planning and Housing Commission adopt the Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Plan and Resolution No. 2641 GRANTING PP2023-0007, based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval. The minutes of the Planning and Housing Commission meeting are included as Exhibit 4.

PREPARED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Locational and zoning map

2. Exhibit 2 – Site plan for Precise Plan 2023-0007

3. Exhibit 3 – Planning and Housing Commission staff report

4. Exhibit 4 – Draft minutes of the Planning and Housing Commission meeting of September 23, 2024

Page 690 of 888 ends

91 FWY

LINCOLN
AVE

SECOND ST

FIFTH ST

POMONA RD
B
UENA
VIS
TA
AVE

SIXTH ST
D ST

ISABELLA
WAY
GA
RFIELD
AVE

BOLLERO PL
91 FWY
91 FWY
Date: 09/17/2024 ®

LOCATIONAL & ZONING MAP
PP2023-0007

PROJECT
SITE
C-3
S
R-3
C-3 MP
MF1
SF
C-3
C-3
C-3
Zoning Legend:

CS - Community Services
C-3 - General Commercial
MF1 - Multiple Family 1
MP - Mobile Home Park
R-3 - Multiple Family Residential
S - School
C-3
C-3
R-3
C-3 MP
CS
C-3
R-3

Page 691 of 888 ends

Page 692 of 888 ends

DATE: 09/23/2024
TO: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
FROM: Planning and Development Department
2024-44
APPLICATION REQUEST:

PP2023-0007 (CONTINUED): Precise Plan application for the review of the site plan, architecture, landscaping and other features associated with the development of a 4,110- square-foot automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls, gas station with five doublesided fuel pumps, and a 3,725-square-foot convenience store proposed on 1.40 acres, located on the north side of 2nd Street, approximately 450 feet west of Buena Vista Avenue. (Applicant: Greens Development, 16530 Bake Parkway, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618) RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the Planning and Housing Commission adopt the Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Plan and Resolution No. 2641 GRANTING PP2023-0007, based on the findings contained in the staff report and conditions of approval.

BACKGROUND
Greens Development is proposing to develop two adjoining parcels that have a combined acreage of 1.40 acres for commercial purposes. The project site is located on the north side of 2nd Street and west of Buena Vista Avenue. The zoning of the parcels is C-3 (General Commercial). Precise plan approval is required.

July 8, 2024 Planning and Housing Commission Meeting
The project was initially proposed for a 1900-square-foot restaurant with drive-through services, gas station with seven double-side fuel pumps (14 total), and a 3,750-square-foot convenience store. The project’s precise plan (PP2023-0007) was reviewed by the Planning

Page 693 of 888 ends

and Housing Commission on July 8, 2024. The Commission raised a number of concerns related to the precise plan and requested additional information from the applicant and staff. The Commission continued the precise plan to the August 12, 2024 Planning and Housing Commission meeting in order to allow the applicant and staff time to address the concerns.

At the August 12, 2024 hearing, the precise plan was continued off calendar in order to allow the applicant and staff more time to address the Commission’s concerns.

Revised Project
Since the initial public hearing, the applicant has made several changes to the project to address some of the concerns raised at the hearing. The key changes involved replacing the 1,900-square-foot restaurant with a self-service carwash facility, reducing the number of gas station fuel pumps from 14 to 10, and reducing the size of the convenience store by 25 square feet. A separate conditional use permit application (CUP2024-0006) is being processed to establish the self-service carwash on the project site. The applicant also revised the project’s sign program, trash enclosure and landscape plan in response to comments received from the Commission. The revisions are summarized in Table 1 below and discussed in greater detail in the Project Description section of this report.

Table 1 – Original and Revised Project Summary
Original Project Revised Project
1,900 s.f. restaurant with drivethrough services4,110 s.f. automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls
Gas station with seven doublesided fuel pumps
(14 fuel pumps total)
Gas station with five double-sided fuel
pumps (10 fuel pumps total)
3,750 s.f. convenience store 3,725 s.f. convenience store 4 parcel identification signs 2 parcel identification signs, plus 1 exempted gas price sign
---
Landscaping includes additional desert
plant materials and other elements to
discourage trespassing.
--- Outdoor seating area removed from the
project to discourage loitering.
---
Trash enclosure to include a mesh material
to fully enclosure the gap between the
enclosure and cover.

Page 694 of 888 ends

Project Concerns and Responses
The following summarizes the concerns that were raised at the July 8, 2024 public hearing and the responses to the concerns.

Concern #1 – Signage
Revise the sign program to meet the Corona Municipal Code’s Sign Ordinance. Additionally, the monument sign proposed on 2nd Street should be placed near the project’s east driveway, away from the busier west driveway.
• Response: The applicant has revised the sign program which now fully complies with the Sign Ordinance. The four originally proposed parcel identification signs have been reduced to two signs, consisting of a 15-foot-high pylon sign and 40-foot-high freeway pylon sign with an electronic message board. The monument sign that was proposed at the west driveway has been removed.

Concern #2 – Traffic
Evaluate how the commercial project and two recently approved affordable housing projects in the vicinity would impact the traffic flow in the area.

• Response: A comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), dated March 18, 2024, was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer, Trames Solutions Inc., which included an assessment of cumulative traffic related impacts from 13 neighboring commercial and residential projects, including the two recently approved housing projects in the vicinity of the project site. The TIA analyzed the existing traffic conditions in the area plus the project’s anticipated traffic impact combined with the cumulative traffic impact on eight street intersections (“study intersections”) located in the vicinity of the project site. The TIA concluded that the eight study intersections would operate at a Level of Service “D” or better during the morning and evening peak hours. The city’s General Plan indicates a Level of Service “D” to be an acceptable service level on arterial streets. The TIA was reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer.

Trames Solutions prepared a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis, dated September 5, 2024, to analyze the applicant’s revised project. Compared to the original project, the revised project would generate approximately 413 fewer vehicle trips per day, with 67 fewer vehicle trips during the morning peak hour and 14 fewer vehicle trips during the evening peak hour. The supplemental traffic impact analysis was reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. The revised project’s traffic impact is discussed in detail in the revised project’s environmental document attached as Exhibit 12 (Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration).

Page 695 of 888 ends

Concern #3 – Trash Enclosure
Revise the trash enclosure to include a mesh covering on all four sides to fully enclose the gap between the block enclosure and cover.
• Response: The applicant has redesigned the trash enclosure to include a mesh covering from the block enclosure to the cover of the enclosure on all four sides of the enclosure, as requested by the Planning and Housing Commission. The revised trash enclosure plan is attached as Exhibit 7.

Concern #4 – Crosswalk
Review a potential alternate location for a crosswalk on 2nd Street to provide pedestrians access to the project site or provide signage directing pedestrians to a signalized crosswalk to prevent j-walking on 2nd Street.
• Response: The Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis (Trams Solutions, dated September 5, 2024) analyzed three options for the placement of a pedestrian crosswalk on 2nd Street:

Option 1 – Under Option 1, the applicant would be required to construct a sidewalk along the north side of 2nd Street from the project site to Buena Vista Avenue to the east. This would allow pedestrians to use the existing crosswalk at the existing stopcontrolled intersection at 2nd Street and Buena Vista Avenue and access the project site on the north side of 2nd Street. Trames Solutions recommends this option as it would allow for a safer crossing of 2nd Street for pedestrians to access the site because vehicles would be stopped at the intersection to allow pedestrians to cross the street.

Option 2 – Under Option 2, an uncontrolled painted/lighted crosswalk on 2nd Street between the project site and Buena Vista Avenue would be installed to allow pedestrians to cross 2nd Street in an uncontrolled, marked crosswalk. Trames Solutions did not recommend this option because it would provide a false sense of security for pedestrians to believe that an oncoming vehicle will stop. The distance between the SR-91 on/off ramp and Buena Vista Avenue is about 1,100 feet. Since the crossing would be located between these two intersections, the relatively short distance to either intersection may not allow appropriate time for pedestrians to cross. Furthermore, a horizontal curve along 2nd Street exists in the vicinity of the crossing area and could reduce the visibility of drivers to pedestrians.

Option 3 – Construct a crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd Street and the SR-91 onramp, located just west of the project site. The applicant would need to obtain

Page 696 of 888 ends

Caltran’s approval for the crosswalk since the crosswalk would require a modification to Caltran’s traffic signals at this intersection.

Staff’s Recommendation – Staff concurs with Trames Solution that Option 2 (midblock crossing) is unsafe. Staff is recommending Option 3 with Option 1 being an alternate location should Caltrans deny the applicant’s request to install a crosswalk per Option 3. Exhibits conceptually depicting Options 1 and 3 are attached as Exhibit

10. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to accept a condition of approval that requires the applicant to install a sign on the south side of 2nd Street at a location approved by the City Traffic Engineer to help direct pedestrians to the crosswalk at either the SR91 on-ramp or at Buena Vista Ave, depending on which location is ultimately constructed.

Concern #5 – Onsite Landscaping
Evaluate and potentially revise the on-site landscaping to discourage homeless encampment/loitering.
• Response: The applicant’s landscape plan has been revised to include elements that discourage unhoused individuals from loitering. This includes the use of desert plants, rocks and other materials to deter encampments. Additionally, the applicant has removed an outdoor seating area that was previously proposed just north of the convenience store to prevent loitering.

Concern #6 – Convenience store attracting unlawful activities Contact the Corona Police Department regarding concerns with unlawful activities (beer runs, theft, and robberies) that could occur due to the convenience store’s proximity to the freeway.
• Response: Staff obtained feedback from the Corona Police Department via Corporal Eric Fox. Corporal Fox responded that the Corona Police Department does not have any concerns with the project moving forward, and pointed out that historically, in the state of California, there is going to be a gas station and/or convenience stores located nearby freeway on/off ramps. Corporal Fox acknowledged that crime can potentially occur due to the project’s proximity to the freeway, and to mitigate some of that crime, he recommended that the following measures be taken:

1. The entire project site should be lit with property lighting.

2. Security cameras should be installed at the project site that records videos.

Page 697 of 888 ends

3. The applicant should purchase a FLOCK Safety camera system and grant the Corona Police Department permission to access the cameras. These cameras could be placed eastbound and westbound on 2nd Street, in front of the project site.

The information was shared with the applicant and they have agreed to implement the recommendations made by the Police Department. The Conditions of Approval, Exhibit 4, have been updated to include these recommendations.

Concern #7 – Fuel Tankers
Concern with large tankers blocking driveways and causing queueing issues on 2nd Street. • Response: The applicant prepared a truck turning exhibit for review by the City Traffic Engineer. The exhibit demonstrates that the site has sufficient space for a fuel tanker to circulate onsite without impacting the parking lot and other features within the project. The applicant informed staff that fueling operations will be scheduled during the nighttime hours to avoid potential disruptions to daytime customers.

Concern #8 – Drive-through Restaurant
Concern with not knowing who the tenant would be for the restaurant. The Commission asked the applicant to evaluate possible restrictions to the design and operations of the restaurant that would prevent queueing and spillage of vehicles into other areas of the site and 2nd Street. The Commission also requested that the applicant evaluate alternative uses to replace the restaurant use.
• Response: The applicant has replaced the restaurant with a self-service carwash facility consisting of an automated carwash tunnel and 11 vacuum stalls. The applicant states that they will manage and operate the carwash, and there will be no branding or franchising of the carwash facility.

Due to the carwash facility’s larger overall footprint compared to the original proposal, the applicant reduced the number of gas station fuel pumps from 14 to 10 and reduced the size of the convenience store by 25 square feet in order to maintain adequate circulation onsite.

Concern #9 – Perimeter Block Wall
Evaluate replacing the perimeter wrought iron fence that is proposed along the freeway with a block wall.

Page 698 of 888 ends

• Response: The applicant prefers not to have a block wall along the site’s freeway perimeter because it would attract graffiti and therefore, is requesting to keep the wrought iron fence as original proposed.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a proposal by Greens Development to develop 1.40 acres with the following commercial uses:
• 4,110-square-foot automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls; • Gas station with five double-sided fuel pumps (10 fuel pumps total); and • 3,725-square-foot convenience store.

The development is designed per the C-3 zone development standards established in Chapter 17.33 of the Corona Municipal Code (CMC). The gas station and carwash facility also conform to additional standards in Chapter 17.22 of the CMC, which contain supplemental standards that are applicable to automotive related uses. The following sections discuss the project’s compliance with the applicable standards in the CMC.

Site Plan
The project site is surrounded by the SR-91 freeway on-ramp to the north and west, and 2nd Street to the south. The layout of the development is dictated by the site’s irregular shape, which tapers into an acute corner at the east end of the site. The carwash facility is proposed on the western and widest portion of the site. The convenience store and a water quality retention basin proposed on the eastern portion and the gas station is situated within the middle portion of the site. The development has sixteen (16) parking spaces and a trash enclosure which are to be shared among the tenants within the development. Vehicular access to the site is provided from 2nd Street via two driveways proposed at the site’s south perimeter. The applicant’s site plan is attached as Exhibit 3.

The site plan complies with the C-3 zone’s setback standards for the front, side and rear yards, with the exception of one area in front of the gas station where the front yard setback is slightly less than the minimum 10-foot front yard setback requirement. A condition of approval has been placed on the project requiring the applicant to revise the site plan to comply with the 10-foot setback requirement at the time of plan check submittal. Table 2 summarizes the project’s compliance with the code’s yard setback requirements.

Page 699 of 888 ends

Table 2: Yard Setbacks
Development
Standard
Minimum Yard
Setback For The
C-3 Zone
Proposed
Yard Setback
Complies with
the CMC?
Front Yard
(along 2nd Steet)
10 feet 10 feet Yes, as
conditioned
Interior Side Yards
(west and east perimeters)
0 10 to 35 feet Yes
Rear Yard
(along SR-91)
0 5 to 10 feet Yes
Carwash Facility. The carwash facility is a self-service facility consisting of a 130-foot long automated carwash tunnel and 11 covered self-serve vacuum stalls. Vehicle access into the tunnel is facilitated by a drive-through lane that splits into two lanes at the payment kiosks and merges into a single lane before the entrance into the tunnel. A floor plan for the tunnel is attached as Exhibit 6.

Gas Station. The gas station is comprised of a gas canopy that will provide shade over five double-sided fuel pumps. In total, there will be 10 fueling positions.

Convenience Store. Customer entrance into the convenience store is located at the west elevation. Additional entrances for employees and deliveries are located on the east elevation. The convenience store includes a cashier counter, shelves, refrigerated displays, and beverage counter space (Exhibit 6). A 12’ x 25’ loading space for the convenience store is provided at the north perimeter of the site, near the convenience store.

The applicant will be processing a lot line adjustment application with the city’s Development Services Division to merge the two parcels into a single parcel. The lot line adjustment requires the approval of the Board of Zoning Adjustment. The Conditions of Approval require the applicant to obtain this approval before the issuance of a building permit.

Parking
The project requires 16 parking spaces per the requirements in the CMC’s Parking Ordinance (Chapter 17.76). The project is capable of providing the 16 spaces plus one loading space.

The 16 parking spaces are separate from the 11 vacuum stalls.

Page 700 of 888 ends

Table 3: Parking Summary
Use Gross
Square
Footage
Net Square
Footage
(minus utility
room)
Parking
Requirement
per CMC
Chapter 17.76
Required
Parking
Provided
Parking
Carwash 4,110 SF 3,957 SF 2 spaces per
carwash stall
2 ---
Gas Station
and
Convenience
Store
3,725 SF 3,500 SF 1 space per
250 SF of floor
area
14 ---
16 16
Elevations
The CMC prescribes no specific architectural style for commercial buildings in the C-3 zone.

The applicant is proposing a contemporary architectural style for the project. The buildings feature tower elements, parapet walls with varying heights, metal awnings, and glazed storefronts. The buildings’ primary exterior finish is stucco with splitface block and stone veneer as accent materials. The color palette consists of shades of grey and brown with green as an accent color. The rooftops are designed to accommodate mechanical equipment which will be screened from street view behind parapet walls. The elevations and renderings for the project are attached as Exhibit 7
The buildings are approximately 24 to 26 feet in height, which complies with the CMC’s maximum allowable building height limit of 40 feet for the C-3 zone.

Landscaping and Perimeter Fencing
The applicant is proposing to landscape the development with a combination of trees and palms along the perimeters of the site and at the driveways. The grounds of the site including the front yard setback area and parking lot will be landscaped with a variety of shrubs. The remote area surrounding the water quality basin will be landscaped with desert and drought tolerant plant materials to discourage trespassing. The project is conditioned to install dense screen shrubs along the exterior side of the carwash drive-through lane.

A wrought iron fence with flowering vines is proposed along the site’s westerly and northerly perimeters to enhance the site and screen the freeway from view. The easterly portion of the site’s north perimeter has an existing freeway soundwall which will remain. All plant materials will be reviewed for full compliance with the CMC’s Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 17.70. The landscape plan is attached as Exhibit 8.

Page 701 of 888 ends

All three signs comply with the applicable standards in the Sign Ordinance and are summarized in Table 4. The applicant’s sign program is attached as Exhibit 9.

Table 4: Parcel Identification Signs
Proposed Sign
Type & Location
Proposed
Sign Height
Proposed
Sign Area
Proposed
Number of
Tenant Panels
Complies with
the CMC?
Freeway sign,
placed at the north
perimeter, adjacent
to SR-91
40 feet 199.83 SF
Electronic
Message Center
N/A Yes
Pylon sign, placed
at the west corner,
adjacent to 2nd
Street
15 feet 53.50 SF
Static Sign Area
3 Yes
Gas price sign 6 feet 24.92 SF
Static Sign Area
N/A Exempted,
per California
Business and
Professional
Code § 13531
Building signage is proposed for the carwash, gas station canopy and convenience store. The signs are conceptually depicted on the applicant’s elevation plans in Exhibit 7. The carwash is depicted with signage on all four sides of the building which exceeds the standard that limits signage on up to three sides of a building. Therefore, a condition of approval has been placed on the project that limits building signage on a maximum of three sides of a building.

All signage require permits prior installation and will be reviewed for full compliance with the Sign Ordinance regulations at the time of permitting.

Public Improvements
The segment of 2nd Street in front of the project site is a modified secondary four-lane street.

The applicant is required to construct the missing public improvements on the north half of

Page 702 of 888 ends

2nd Street adjacent to the project’s frontage. The improvements include the construction of the missing roadway pavement to include two 12-foot-wide travel lanes, a six-foot-wide sidewalk, and a modified landscaped parkway that will vary in width from approximately one foot to five feet. The Development Services Division is requiring the applicant to dedicate a one- to five-foot wide easement to the city for utility and access purposes along the project’s frontage.

Vehicles will be restricted to right-in and right-out turn movements at the west project driveway due to the raised medians.

As there is currently no sidewalk on the north side of 2nd Street between Lincoln Avenue and Buena Vista Avenue, the Development Services Division is requiring the applicant to construct a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd Street and the SR-91 eastbound on-ramp to provide pedestrian connectivity from the south side of 2nd Street to the project site. The applicant will need to obtain approval from Caltrans for the crosswalk since the crosswalk would require a modification to Caltran’s traffic signals at this intersection. Per the conditions of approval, in the event the applicant is unable to obtain approval from Caltrans, the applicant shall construct a sidewalk along the north side of 2nd Street from the project easterly limits to Buena Vista Avenue to provide pedestrian connectivity to the site.

Exhibits depicting the pedestrian connectivity at both locations are attached as Exhibit 10.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The city approved General Plan Amendment 2023-0004 on August 7, 2024 related to a portion of the project site and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) which was prepared for the original project.

Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the city has prepared an Addendum to the previously adopted MND for the revised project. The city has determined that the revised project and the Addendum demonstrate that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation measures identified in the previously adopted MND remain substantively unchanged despite project modifications. The proposed revised project does not raise any new issues or result in impacts not previously analyzed in the prior MND, and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent MND exist. The Addendum is attached as Exhibit 12.

FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant has paid the applicable application processing fees for the project.

Page 703 of 888 ends

PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS
The project was readvertised for the September 23, 2024 Planning and Housing Commission public hearing. A 10-day public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site, as well as advertised in the Sentinel Weekly News and posted at the project site. As of the preparation of this report, the Planning and Development Department has not received any response regarding the project.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The revised project meets the development standards in the CMC and addresses the concerns raised by the Planning and Housing Commission from the July 8, 2024 public hearing. The carwash, gas station and convenience store are considered freeway-oriented uses that are appropriate for the size and location of the project site. The development would support the local neighborhood and freeway commuters alike and would enhance a vacant infill site that would otherwise remain undeveloped due to its irregular shape.

The project site accommodates the physical elements of the development and has adequate vehicular access from 2nd Street as well as adequate on-site circulation for vehicles and fueling trucks. Development of the project would enhance the safety of the area because the applicant is conditioned to construct or guarantee the construction of all missing public improvements adjacent to the site, including sidewalks, adequate roadway width, and pedestrian connectivity.

The project’s contemporary architecture is clean and attractive and comprised of standard, durable construction materials appropriate for commercial buildings. The design, size and height of the buildings are in scale with the buildings in the neighborhood which is comprised of buildings that were built in different styles over numerous decades.

Therefore, the Planning and Development Department recommends approval of PP2023- 0007 subject to the recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit 4 and based on the findings of approval below.

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR PP2023-0007

1. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the city has prepared an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) previously adopted on August 7, 2024 for associated application GPA2023-0004. The city has determined that the proposed revised project and the Addendum demonstrate that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation measures identified in the previously adopted MND remain substantively unchanged despite project modifications. The proposed revised project does not raise any new issues or result in impacts not previously analyzed in

Page 704 of 888 ends

the prior MND, and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent MND exist.

2. All the conditions necessary to granting a Precise Plan as set forth in Section

17.91.070 of the CMC do exist in reference to PP2023-0007 for the following reasons:
a. The project is consistent with the Corona General Plan because the proposed commercial use is consistent with the General Plan’s General Commercial land use designation.
b. The project, as designed and with the conditions of approval, comply with the applicable development standards established for the C-3 zone, and other applicable requirements in the Corona Municipal Code.
c. The project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all applicable requirements and procedures of such act have been followed, and as shown by the project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum in Exhibit 12, mitigation measures have been established to reduce the project’s impacts on the environment to less than significant.
d. As demonstrated by the project’s site plan and the conditions of approval for the project, the site accommodates the scale of the project, by adhering to the objective development standards required by the zoning of the site and other physical features of the proposal including fencing, water quality facilities, and signage.

PREPARED BY: SANDRA VANIAN, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBMITTED BY: JOANNE COLETTA, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Exhibits:

1. Resolution No. 2641

2. Locational and Zoning Map

3. Site Plan

4. Conditions of Approval

5. Conceptual Grading Plan

6. Floor Plan

7. Elevations and Renderings

8. Landscape Plan

9. Parcel Identification Sign Program

10.Crosswalk Exhibits

11. Applicant’s Response Letter, dated August 12, 2024

12. Environmental Documentation

Page 705 of 888 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2641
APPLICATION NUMBER: PP2023-0007

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND HOUSING

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CORONA,

CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE

REVIEW OF THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURE,

LANDSCAPING AND OTHER FEATURES ASSOCIATED
WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 4,110-SQUARE-FOOT
AUTOMATED CARWASH TUNNEL WITH 11 VACUUM

STALLS, GAS STATION WITH FIVE DOUBLE-SIDED
FUEL PUMPS, AND A 3,725-SQUARE-FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE PROPOSED ON 1.40 ACRES
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 2ND STREET,
APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET WEST OF BUENA VISTA
AVENUE. (APPLICANT: GREENS DEVELOPMENT)
WHEREAS, the application to the City of Corona, California, for a Precise Plan under the provisions of Chapter 17.91 in the Corona Municipal Code, has been duly submitted to said City's Planning and Housing Commission for the review of the site plan, architecture, landscaping and other features associated with the development of a 4,110-square-foot automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls, gas station with five double-sided fuel pumps, and a 3,725-square-foot convenience store proposed on 1.40 acres located on the north side of 2nd Street, approximately 450 feet west of Buena Vista Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Precise Plan 2023-0007 (PP2023-0007) was initially submitted in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 2023-0004 (GPA2023-0004), and Change of Zone 2023-0006 (CZ2023-0006) (“Proposed Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission held a noticed public hearing for the Proposed Project on July 8th, 2024, as required by law; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2024, as the first action on the Proposed Project, the Planning and Housing Commission approved Resolution 2640 adopting GPA2023-0004 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 for the Proposed Project because the information contained in the MND, the initial study and the administrative records for this project, including all written and oral evidence provided during the comment period and presented to the Planning and Housing Commission, the

Page 706 of 888 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2641
APPLICATION NO. PP2023-0007
PAGE | 2
Commission found that potential environmental impacts of this project are either no impact or less-than-significant; and
WHEREAS, after close of said hearing, the Commission continued the public hearing for PP2023-0007 to August 12, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission held a public hearing on August 12, 2024 and continued the public hearing for PP2023-0007 off calendar; and WHEREAS, an Addendum to the adopted MND was prepared in order to evaluate the project revisions proposed by PP2023-0007, pursuant to California Environmental Guidelines Section 15164; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission held a public hearing for PP2023-0007 on September 23, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission by formal action, found that all the conditions necessary to granting Precise Plan as set forth in Corona Municipal Code Section 17.91.070 do exist in reference to PP2023-0007 based on the evidence presented to the Commission during said hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Housing Commission based its recommendation to approve PP2023-0007 according to certain conditions of approval and the findings set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA Findings. The project was previously evaluated under a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) which was adopted by the City Council on August 7, 2024. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the city has prepared an Addendum to the previously adopted MND for the revised project. The city has determined that the revised project and the Addendum demonstrate that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation measures identified in the previously adopted MND remain substantively unchanged despite project modifications. The proposed revised project does not raise any new issues or result in impacts not previously analyzed in the prior MND, and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent MND exist.

SECTION 2. Precise Plan Findings. Pursuant to Corona Municipal Code (“CMC”) section 17.91.070 and based on the entire record before the Planning and Housing Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission hereby makes and adopts the following findings:

Page 707 of 888 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2641
APPLICATION NO. PP2023-0007
PAGE | 3

2. All the conditions necessary to granting a Precise Plan as set forth in Section 17.91.070 of the CMC do exist in reference to PP2023-0007 for the following reasons:
a. The project is consistent with the Corona General Plan because the proposed commercial use is consistent with the General Plan’s General Commercial land use designation.
b. The project, as designed and with the conditions of approval, comply with the applicable development standards established for the C-3 zone, and other applicable requirements in the Corona Municipal Code.
c. The project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all applicable requirements and procedures of such act have been followed, and as shown by the project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum in Exhibit 12, mitigation measures have been established to reduce the project’s impacts on the environment to less than significant.
d. As demonstrated by the project’s site plan and the conditions of approval for the project, the site accommodates the scale of the project, by adhering to the objective development standards required by the zoning of the site and other physical features of the proposal including fencing, water quality facilities, and signage.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered to the City Clerk of said City and a copy thereof be sent to the applicant therefore at the address of said applicant as set forth in the application for said Precise Plan.

Page 708 of 888 ends

Page 709 of 888 ends

91 FWY

LINCOLN
AVE

SECOND ST

FIFTH ST

POMONA RD
B
UENA
VIS
TA
AVE

SIXTH ST
D ST

ISABELLA
WAY
GA
RFIELD
AVE

BOLLERO PL
91 FWY
91 FWY
Date: 09/17/2024 ®

LOCATIONAL & ZONING MAP
PP2023-0007

PROJECT
SITE
C-3
S
R-3
C-3 MP
MF1
SF
C-3
C-3
C-3
Zoning Legend:

CS - Community Services
C-3 - General Commercial
MF1 - Multiple Family 1
MP - Mobile Home Park
R-3 - Multiple Family Residential
S - School
C-3
C-3
R-3
C-3 MP
CS
C-3
R-3

Page 710 of 888 ends

Page 711 of 888 ends

Details:

LIST OF CONDITIONS

DEPARTMENT CONTACT
BUILDING Anthony Hurley

1. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 pm to 7:00 am, Monday thru Saturday and 6:00 pm to 10:00 am on Sundays and Federal Holidays.

2. At the time of Building Plan Check submittal, the applicant shall comply with the citys plan check submittal requirements which includes the following: Plot Plan * Foundation Plan * Floor Plan * Ceiling and roof framing plan * Electrical Plans (electrical service shall be underground per Corona Municipal Code chapter 15.60), including size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, single line diagram, circuit schedule and demand load calculations * Plumbing plans including sewer or septic tank location, minimum number of plumbing fixture calculations, isometric diagram including underground piping, water and drainage fixture unit calculations and pipe sizing including meter and building supply, gas piping and roof venting plan * Mechanical plan, heating and air conditioning diagram, equipment schedule * Landscape and Irrigation plans - Paper submittals shall include four (4) complete sets detached from building plans. Refer to the citys plan check submittal requirements and checklists for a complete list.

3. Paper plan submittals shall include two (2) sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations and soils reports.

Architects/Engineers stamp and wet signature is required prior to submittal of plan check.

4. Separate permits are required for all fences, walls, signs, and PV systems.

5. Buildings shall not be occupied prior to posting of Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building Division.

6. The Project shall be designed to show compliance with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:

A. California Building Code
B. California Residential Code
C. California Electrical Code
D. California Mechanical Code
E. California Plumbing Code
F. California Energy Code
G. California Fire Code
H. California Green Building Standards Code
I. Including local amendments, and the Corona Municipal Code.

7. An approved Construction Waste Management Plan and Recycling Worksheets shall be kept on site and maintained by the applicant, and made available for inspection by City representatives at all times in accordance with the California Green Building Standards Code. Documentation which demonstrates compliance with the minimum recycling of waste materials required by CAL Green shall be provided to the building inspector prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Final Approval.

8. All fees, including but not limited to, occupancy fees, property development tax, and school fees must be paid in full prior to issuance of building permits. Any development impact fees that apply to the project must be paid in full prior to NIC or CofO issuance.

Project Number: PP2023-0007
Applied: 9/14/2023 Approved:

Closed: Expired:

Status: RECEIVED
Parent Project: DPR2022-
0031
Carwash, drive thru, gas station, convenience store
Site Address: 231 S LINCOLN AVE CORONA, CA 92882
Greens Development
16530 Bake Parkway, Suite 200 Irvine CA, 92618
Description:

Applicant:

PP2023-0007 1 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 712 of 888 ends

BUILDING Anthony Hurley

9. Grading plans shall be approved and pads certified prior to Building permit issuance.

10. Project shall be designed to conform to the applicable edition of the California Building Standards Code including local amendments, and the Corona Municipal Code.

11. All deferred features and related permits shall be approved, and the building not be occupied, prior to issuance of CofO.

Utilities will not be released until a CofO, TCO, or Temporary Utility Bond has been issued.

12. Project site shall be kept clean, secure, safe, and BMPs installed and maintained, and follow all city, state, and county requirements and due standard of care.

13. Project entitlement approvals shall be obtained prior to plan approval and issuance of building permits. Final Conditions of Approval shall be made part of set of plans [Conditions of approval shall be pasted on plans].

PLANNING

1. This permit hereby allowed is conditional upon the privileges being utilized by the securing of the first permit thereof, precise plan permit within two (2) years after the effective date of the Precise Plan approval and if construction work is not begun within said time and carried on diligently to completion, this authorization shall become void, and any privilege or permit granted shall be deemed to have lapsed.

2. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Corona Municipal Code (CMC) and ordinances and the relevant Specific Plan, if any, including the payment of all required fees.

3. The applicant or his successor in interest shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for PP2023-0007.

4. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City of Corona and its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries of any kind, in law or equity, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any approval, decision or other action of the City of Corona, whether such approval, decision or other action was by its City Council, Planning and Housing Commission or other board, director, official, officer, employee, volunteer or agent. To the extent that Government Code Section 66474.9 applies, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding made known to the City to which Government Code Section 66474.9 applies and the City will fully cooperate in the defense. The Applicant's obligations hereunder shall include, without limitation, the payment of any and all damages, consultant and expert fees, and attorney's fees and other related costs and expenses. The City shall have the right to retain such legal counsel as the City deems necessary and appropriate.

5. Nothing herein shall be construed to require City to defend any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any such City approval, decision or other action. If at any time Applicant chooses not to defend (or continue to defend) any attack against or attempt to challenge, set aside, void or annul any such City approval, decision or other action, the City may choose, in its sole discretion, to defend or not defend any such action. In the event that the City decides not to defend or continue the defense, Applicant shall be obligated to reimburse City for any and all costs, fees, penalties or damages associated with dismissing the action or proceeding. If at any time both the Applicant and the City choose not to defend (or continue to defend) any action noted herein, all subject City approvals, decisions or other actions shall be null and void. The Applicant shall be required to enter into any reimbursement agreement deemed necessary by the City to effectuate the terms of this condition.

6. Prior to issuance of a permit, the applicant shall revise the project's building and grading plans to meet the minimum required 10-foot front yard setback requirement along 2nd Street.

7. The applicant shall submit a separate fence and wall plan for all perimeter fences and walls for plan check and permits. The screen fence and vine planting at the westerly and northerly perimeters of the project shall be installed per the landscape plan.

8. The applicant shall submit separate landscape plans for plan check. At the time of submittal, the applicant shall submit a deposit in the amount of $5,000 to the Planning Division to cover third-party plan check and inspection services associated with the project. Any unused funds remaining from the deposit will be returned to the applicant upon project completion. The deposit is separate from the Building Division's typical plan check submittal fees.

9. The applicant's landscape plan shall be in substantial conformance to the preliminary landscape plan in Exhibit 8 of PP2023- 0007. All landscaping shall be installed per the approved landscape plan prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

PP2023-0007 2 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 713 of 888 ends

PLANNING

10. This project is subject to Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's MSHCP fee for commercial development at the time of building permit issuance.

11. The trash enclosure shall be constructed of decorative block with solid metal gates and covered with a solid or lattice cover painted to match the commercial center's color scheme. All gaps between the block enclosure and cover shall be secured with a durable metal mesh material or similar.

12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain approval of a lot line adjustment to consolidate the parcels.

13. The applicant's landscape plan shall include a dense-type shrub along the exterior side of the drive-through lane for headlight buffering. The shrubs shall be a minimum of 3 feet in height at the time of installation.

14. The project shall implement the following measures and include as part of the applicant's plan review package for a building permit:

1. The entire project site shall be lit with property lighting.

2. Security cameras shall be installed at the project site that records videos.

3. The applicant shall purchase a FLOCK Safety camera system and grant the Corona Police Department permission to access the cameras. The cameras shall be placed eastbound and westbound on 2nd Street, in front of the project site.

15. The applicant shall maintain, and replace as necessary, the screen vine landscaping along the perimeter wrought iron fence adjacent to the freeway right-of-way. [ADDED BY THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2024.]

16. If Caltrans is unable to meet the construction schedule of the applicant with respect to the crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd Street and the SR-91 on-ramp, the applicant shall construct the sidewalk extending from the project site to the intersection at 2nd Street and Buena Vista Avenue prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project. [ADDED BY THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2024.]

PUBLIC WORKS

1. The Public Works, Planning and Development, and Utilities Department comments for the subject application shall be completed at no cost to any government agency. All questions regarding the intent of the comments shall be referred to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division. Should a conflict arise between City of Corona standards and design criteria and any other standards and design criteria, City of Corona standards and design criteria shall prevail.

2. The developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City ordinances and resolutions.

3. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the proposed project will not unreasonably interfere with the use of any easement holder of the property.

4. All improvement and grading plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inch by thirty-six (36) inch Mylar and signed by a registered civil engineer or other registered/licensed professional as required.

5. The submitted site plan shall correctly show all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses. Any omission or misrepresentation of these documents may require said site plan to be resubmitted for further consideration.

6. Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall record a Lot Line Adjustment for APN 118-270-024 and APN 118-270-054 to adjust the property lines as shown on the submitted site plan.

7. In the event that off-site right-of-way or easements are required for the City of Corona master plan facilities to comply with these conditions of approval, the developer is required to secure such right-of-way or easements at no cost to the City.

8. All existing and new utilities adjacent to and on-site shall be placed underground in accordance with City of Corona ordinances.

9. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall cause the engineer of record to submit project base line work for all layers in AutoCAD DXF format on Compact Disc (CD) to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division. If the required files are unavailable, the developer shall pay a scanning fee to cover the cost of scanning the as-built plans.

PP2023-0007 3 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 714 of 888 ends

PUBLIC WORKS

10. The developer shall monitor, supervise and control all construction and construction related activities to prevent them from causing a public nuisance including, but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following:
a) Removal of dirt, debris or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day.
(b) Construction operations, including building related activities and deliveries, shall be restricted to Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., excluding holidays, and from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays, in accordance with City Municipal Code 15.04.060, unless otherwise extended or shortened by the City Engineer or Building Official. (c) The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site.

Violation of any condition or restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedies as noted in the City Municipal Code. In addition, the City Engineer or Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions.

11. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall ensure that a property owner's association is established for the purpose of maintaining all shared driveways, shared drainage facilities, shared landscaping, common areas, and private utilities.

The association documents, including any necessary Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's), shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Development Department, Planning and Development Services Divisions.

12. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall finish the construction or post security guaranteeing the construction of all public improvements. Said improvements shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
a) All street facilities along Second Street adjacent to the project site including the roadway widening, sidewalks, crosswalks, and relocation of existing facilities. Applicable off-site improvements may be required to Buena Vista Avenue to provide pedestrian connectivity from a crosswalk.
b) Raised median from the SR-91 on ramp to the easterly driveway and from the easterly driveway to approximately 100 feet west of the easterly project boundary.
c) All drainage facilities.
d) All required grading, including erosion control.
e) All required sewer and water facilities.
f) All required landscaping, including median and parkway landscaping. g) All under grounding of overhead utilities, except for cables greater than 32k volts.

13. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall construct or guarantee the construction of sidewalk and crosswalk improvements for pedestrian connectivity to the proposed development. (Alternative No. 1) The developer shall coordinate with Caltrans for a potential signalized pedestrian crosswalk across 2nd Street at the intersection of 2nd Street and the 91- freeway eastbound on-ramp. (Alternative No.2) If Caltrans deems this crosswalk to not be feasible, then the improvement plans shall show sidewalk improvements along the north side of 2nd Street from the easterly limits of the Project frontage to the intersection of 2nd Street and Buena Vista Avenue.

The developer shall relocate all facilities necessary to comply with City Standards and ADA accessibility requirements.

14. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall complete all improvements as required by these conditions of approval unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

15. All the grading design criteria shall be per City of Corona standards, Corona Municipal Code Title 15 Chapter 15.36 and City Council Ordinance Number 2568, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

16. Prior to approval of grading plans, the applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a soils and geologic report prepared by a Registered Engineer to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division. The report shall address the soil's stability and geological conditions of the site. If applicable, the report shall also address: deep seated and surficial stability of existing natural slopes; modified natural slopes which are subject to fuel zones; manufactured slopes and stability along proposed daylight lines; minimum required setbacks from structures; locations and length of proposed bench drains, sub-drains or french drains; and any other applicable data necessary to adequately analyze the proposed development.

17. Prior to approval of grading plans, erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division.

PP2023-0007 4 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 715 of 888 ends

PUBLIC WORKS

18. Prior to approval of grading plans, the applicant shall obtain a General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.

Proof of filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) will be required by the City. The WDID # shall be displayed on the title sheet of the grading plans.

19. Prior to approval of grading plans, the applicant shall comply with the Federal Clean Water Act and shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be available at the project site for review.

20. Prior to issuance of grading permit or construction of any improvements, a letter will be required from a qualified botanist, plant taxonomist or field biologist specializing in native plants, stating that an investigation and/or eradication of scale broom weed (Lepidospartum Squamatum) has been completed.

21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall cause the civil engineer of record and soils engineer of record for the approved grading plans to submit pad certifications and compaction test reports for the subject lots where building permits are requested.

22. Prior to release of grading security, the developer shall cause the civil engineer of record for the approved grading plans to submit a set of as-built grading plans with respect to Water Quality Control facilities.

23. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, any environmental Phase I and Phase II findings and recommended actions to remove contamination resulting from previous use of the subject site shall be implemented.

24. All City of Corona NPDES permit requirements for NPDES and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) shall be met per Corona Municipal Code Title 13 Chapter 13.27 and City Council Ordinance Numbers 2291 and 2828 unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a Final WQMP, prepared in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminary WQMP, shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division for approval. Upon its final approval, the applicant shall submit one copy on a CD-ROM in PDF format.

26. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall record Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) or enter into an acceptable maintenance agreement with the City to inform future property owners to implement the approved WQMP.

27. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide proof of notification to occupants of all nonstructural BMPs and educational and training requirements for said BMPs as directed in the approved WQMP.

28. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure all structural post construction BMPs identified in the approved project specific Final WQMP are constructed and operational.

29. All the drainage design criteria shall be per City of Corona standards and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

30. Prior to approval of any improvement plans, the applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology study. Said study shall include the existing, interim and the ultimate proposed hydrologic conditions including key elevations, drainage patterns and proposed locations and sizes of all existing and proposed drainage devices. The hydrology study shall present a full breakdown of all the runoff generated on- and off-site.

31. Prior to approval of improvement plans, the improvement plans submitted by the applicant shall address the following: The project drainage design shall be designed to accept and properly convey all on- and off-site drainage flowing on or through the site. The project drainage system design shall protect downstream properties from any damage caused by alteration of drainage patterns such as concentration or diversion of flow. Concentrated drainage on commercial lots shall be diverted through parkway drains under sidewalks. All non-residential lots shall drain toward an approved water quality or drainage facility. Once onsite drainage has been treated it may continue into an approved public drainage facility or diverted through under-sidewalk parkway drains.

32. Street design criteria and cross sections shall be per City of Corona standards, approved Specific Plan design guidelines and the State of California Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall dedicate a Public Utility Easement and a Sidewalk Easement in favor of the City from the north right-of-way of Second Street to 12 feet north of the proposed Second Street curb face. The developer shall dedicate additional easements as needed to serve and provide access to and along the Project.

PP2023-0007 5 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 716 of 888 ends

PUBLIC WORKS

34. Prior to approval of improvement plans, the improvement plans submitted by the applicant shall include the following:
a) All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Corona standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. b) All street intersections shall be at ninety (90) degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. c) All reverse curves shall have a minimum tangent of fifty (50) feet in length. d) Under grounding of existing and proposed utility lines. e) Street lights.
f) Sidewalks shall be constructed 5-feet in width in conformance with City Standard No. 104 and No.105. g) Second Street along the project frontage shall be widened to accommodate a 4-lane roadway with a raised median that varies from 4 feet to 14 feet wide, along Second Street from the SR-91 on/off ramp to easterly project's property or as approved by the City Traffic Engineer and City Engineer. h) Lane striping shall be installed with a minimum width of 12-feet lanes transversing westbound along Second Street from the transition of the Collector Street Section to the Secondary Arterial Street Section or as approved by the City Traffic Engineer.

Any striping modifications as required by Caltrans shall also be installed. i) All other public improvements shall conform to City of Corona standards. j) All street improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, or unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
(k) Developer shall evaluate the location for pedestrian restrictive signage to discourage midblock crossing across 2nd Street.

Signs shall be placed on both sides of 2nd Street between the SR91 on-ramp to Buena Vista Avenue unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. [AMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2024]

35. Prior to issuance of a construction permit, the applicant shall coordinate with Caltrans for a design that alleviates the queuing of vehicles in the right lane of westbound Second Street. The City, the Applicant, and Caltrans shall review options for a design that may include, but are not limited to, restriping, widening, signal modification, etc. and the developer shall construct the improvements agreed to by the City and Caltrans. And as required, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans. Alternatively, the developer may conduct additional analysis provided by a registered Traffic Engineer to determine if the vehicular queuing on the westbound Second Street would conflict with the use of the proposed project’s driveways. Subject to review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer, if the analysis shows that there is no conflict with the proposed driveways and/ or project circulation, then the applicant shall not be required to construct any improvements within Caltrans right-of-way related to the right lane vehicle queuing. The applicant may still be required to construct improvements within City right-of-way based on recommendations by the Traffic Engineer.

36. Prior to approval of improvement plans, the improvement plans shall show all the streets to be improved to half width plus ten (10) additional feet unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. At the discretion of the applicant, the existing pavement maybe cored to confirm adequate section and R values during the design process and any findings shall be incorporated into the project design. Therefore improvements may include full pavement reconstruction, grind and overlay, or slurry seal. All striping shall be replaced in kind.

37. Prior to release of public improvement security, the developer shall cause the civil engineer of record for the approved improvement plans to submit a set of as-built plans for review and approval by the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division.

38. Prior to acceptance of improvements, the City Engineer may determine that aggregate slurry, as defined in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, may be required one year after acceptance of street(s) by the City if the condition of the street(s) warrant its application. All striping shall be replaced in kind. The applicant is the sole responsible party for the maintenance of all the improvements until said acceptance takes place.

39. Prior to approval of the improvement plans and/or grading plans, the developer shall comply with the approved traffic study recommendations, including:
- Construct Second Street at its ultimate half section width as a secondary 4-lane roadway from the westerly project boundary to the easterly project boundary.
- Construct a raised median along Second Street from the SR-91 on/off ramp to the easterly driveway. - Provide stop sign control at the project driveways.
- Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. - Construct a 245 foot (minimum) eastbound left turn lane at the easterly driveway.

PP2023-0007 6 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 717 of 888 ends

PUBLIC WORKS

40. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall provide all of the necessary documents and fees needed to annex this project into a City of Corona Community Facilities District (CFD) 2016-3 (Maintenance Services). All assessable parcels therein shall be subject to annual CFD charges (special taxes or assessments). The developer shall be responsible for all costs incurred during annexation into the CFDs.

41. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all proposed parkway, slope maintenance, and/or median landscaping specified in the site plan or in these Conditions of Approval shall be constructed.

42. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, any damage to existing landscape easement areas due to project construction shall be repaired or replaced by the developer, or developer's successors in interest, at no cost to the City of Corona.

43. Prior to issuance of a building permit and/or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall pay all development fees, including but not limited to Development Impact Fees (DIF) per City Municipal Code 16.23 and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) per City Municipal Code 16.21. Said fees shall be collected at the rate in effect at the time of fee collection as specified by the current City Council fee resolutions and ordinances.

44. All the potable water and sewer design criteria shall be per City of Corona Utilities Department standards and Riverside County Department of Health Services Standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Utilities Director.

45. Prior to approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall obtain all necessary easements for any required offsite water and sewer facilities.

46. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a domestic water and fire flow system shall be approved by the Utilities Department and constructed by the developer, to the satisfaction of the Utilities Director and Fire Chief. All backflow devices shall be constructed on a flat pad parallel with the sidewalk with a 3-foot minimum clearance in all directions of the apparatus and as approved by the Utilities Department.

47. Prior to approval of improvement plans, all utility valves shall be located in the street pavement.

48. Prior to improvement plans approval, the applicant shall ensure that all water meters, fire hydrants or other water appurtenances shall not be located within a drive aisle or path of travel.

49. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall pay all water and sewer fees, including but not limited to connection fees, wastewater treatment fees, sewer capacity fees and all other appropriate water and sewer fees.

50. Prior to approval of improvement plans, when applicable, the applicant shall submit detailed potable water and sewer studies, prepared by a registered civil engineer, which shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division for review and approval. The study shall analyze the existing and proposed sewer and water facilities. Results of the system analysis may require special construction for the potable water and sewer systems, such as upsizing downstream sewer lines, installing pressure regulators, booster pumps, special material for pipeline construction, backwater valves and construction of other appurtenances as necessary to serve the proposed development. Effects of the proposed development, engineering analysis and special construction requirements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Development Department, Development Services Division, and the Utilities Department. The study that was submitted dated May 2024 has not been approved.

51. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall construct or guarantee the construction of all required public improvements including but not limited to, the potable water line, sewer line, potable water services, sewer laterals, double detector check assemblies and reduced pressure principle assemblies within the public right of way and-or easements.

52. The applicant shall dedicate easements for all public water and sewer needed to serve the project in accordance the Utilities Department Standards. All public water and sewer facilities shall be provided a minimum 20-foot-wide paved access road unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Director. Structures and trees shall not be constructed or installed within a public utility easement.

53. Prior to building permit issuance, whichever comes first, the applicant shall construct or guarantee the construction of a private fire system with double detector check assemblies at all public fire services to the satisfaction of the Utilities Department and Fire Chief.

54. Fire Hydrants shall be a maximum 250-300 feet apart or as directed by the Fire Department.

PP2023-0007 7 of 8 (Continued on next page)
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 718 of 888 ends

PUBLIC WORKS

55. Manhole rim elevations shall be lower than all pad elevations immediately downstream. Otherwise a back flow prevention valve will be required.

56. Static pressures exceeding 80 psi require an individual pressure regulator.

57. Reclaimed water shall be used for any construction activity, unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Director or their designee. Prior to obtaining a reclaimed construction meter from the City, a Reclaimed Water Application shall be submitted for the contractor to receive certification to handle reclaimed water.

58. The applicant shall provide a separate irrigation water service for all POA-CFD landscaped lots or easements.

59. The landscape plans of all parkway and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) and Community Facilities District (CFD) lots shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

60. The developer shall install automatic irrigation to all street trees separated from adjacent residences by a fence or wall prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

61. Prior to issuance of a construction permit, the developer shall coordinate the reconstruction, relocation, and/or removal of any existing public landscaping facilities (including water meters/services, valves, etc.) with the Community Services Department and Development Services Division.
8 of 8
Project Conditions
City of Corona

Page 719 of 888 ends

Page 720 of 888 ends

Page 721 of 888 ends

Page 722 of 888 ends

Page 723 of 888 ends

Page 724 of 888 ends

Page 725 of 888 ends

Page 726 of 888 ends

Page 727 of 888 ends

Page 728 of 888 ends

Page 729 of 888 ends

Page 730 of 888 ends

Page 731 of 888 ends

Client: Project:

This is an original unpublished drawing created by AD/S Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in conjunction with a project being planned for you by AD/S Inc. It is not to be shown to anyone outside your organization, nor is it to be used, reproduced, copied or exhibited in any fashion without written permission from AD/S Inc.

Revisions: Project No:

Date:

Sign Type:

Sheet No:
1 16530 Bake Parkway, 2nd Floor
Irvine, CA 92618
QT0010582-R12(conc)
2024-09-03

RB/LR/SH
NEC of 91 Fwy & W 2nd St.

Corona, CA 92882
A
SLP 1.00 of 7
Sign Location Plan
2 DEVELOPMENT
GR NS Corona Fuel Site
SITE PLAN 1 SCALE: 1" = 45'-0"
A
APN: 118-270-024
APN: 118-270-054
D
B
637'-8" 2nd Street Frontage
340'-2" 91-Fwy Frontage
241'-3" 91-Fwy Frontage
50'-0" Perimeter
50'-0" Perimeter
50'-0" Perimeter

Page 732 of 888 ends

Client: Project:

Revisions: Project No:

Date:

Sign Type:

Sheet No:
1 16530 Bake Parkway, 2nd Floor
Irvine, CA 92618
QT0010582-R12(conc)
2024-09-03

RB/LR/SH
NEC of 91 Fwy & W 2nd St.

Corona, CA 92882
A
of 7
A: Parcel Sign (Fwy Oriented)

1.00 4

DEVELOPMENT
GR NS Corona Fuel Site
Qty. One Enterprise Sign
Total Sign Area = 199.83 sq. ft.

Conceptual Only
A
- This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. - The location of the Disconnect Switch after installation shall comply with Article 600.6(A)(1) of the National Electrical Code.

E-Note #1: All requirements not in sign company’s
scope of work must be in place prior to installation.

E-Note #2: Electrical to be brought to base of sign
(by others) and not in sign company's scope of work.

E-Note #3: Timers and/or photocells for signs to be
furnished and installed by the customer's electrician,
who should also ensure that the completed electrical
system is code compliant.

ALL COMPONENTS TO BE APPROVED

ALL SIGNS TO BE LISTED
___Dedicated ___ Amp Circuits at ________ V 2 1 120/277 olts PRIMARY ELECTRICAL TO SIGN LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. A DEDICATED CIRCUIT WITH NO SHARED NEUTRALS AND A GROUND RETURNING TO THE PANEL IS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION.

ALL TRANSFORMERS/DRIVERS/POWER SUPPLIES SHALL BE (GFI) GROUND FAULT-INTERRUPTED.

ALL SIGNS HAVE: - DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT
- THREE WIRES : LINE, NEUTRAL, & GROUND
- WIRE SIZE : MINIMUM OF 12 GA. THHN COPPER WIRE
ALSO NOTE: GAUGE OF WIRE IS DETERMINED BY THE LENGTH OF RUN & AMPERAGE AS PER NEC ARTICLE 300. - GROUND WIRE MUST BE CONTINUOUS AND GO FROM THE SIGN TO THE PANELBOARD GROUND BUS. - VOLTAGE SHOULD READ NO MORE THAN 3 VOLTS BETWEEN GROUND AND NEUTRAL. - CONDUIT CAN NOT BE USED AS GROUND PATH.
- POWER TO SIGN MUST BE DONE BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN OR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.

REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL ILLUMINATION:

NOTE: THIS PERTAINS TO THE SIGN'S INTERNAL WIRING ONLY, NOT THE PRIMARY WIRING.

FRONT VIEW - Fwy Oriented Enterprise Sign A SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"END VIEW 40'-0" Above Freeway Grade
22'-0" Dig. Display Board Sign Body
9'-1"
264"x 109"
= 199.83 sq.ft.
5'-0"
4'-0" wide
alum. cladding
over
24" & 42" dia.pipes
6"
12"typ.

This end is
closest to
the Freeway

EAST FACE WEST FACE
Doubled faced, freeway oriented enterprise sign ("pylon").

Faces are programmable LED digital display boards.

Sign height (at top) shall be 40' above freeway deck.

This end is
closest to
the Freeway

Page 733 of 888 ends

Client: Project:

Revisions: Project No:

Date:

Sign Type:

Sheet No:
1 16530 Bake Parkway, 2nd Floor
Irvine, CA 92618
QT0010582-R12(conc)
2024-09-03

RB/LR/SH
NEC of 91 Fwy & W 2nd St.

Corona, CA 92882
A
of 7
B: Parcel Sign

2.00 DEVELOPMENT
GR NS Corona Fuel Site
5 Qty. One (1) Pylon Sign
Total Sign Area = 53.50 sq. ft.

Conceptual Only
B
FRONT VIEW - Option #1: "Squarish" ID panels (facing Lincoln Ave.) 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4'-6"
15'-0"
4"
4'-6"
Doubled faced pylon
Tenant ID's shall be per national brand standards.

Top two ID panels are flat and shall have face-lit LED illum'd channel letters.

Bottom ID panels are routed alum. faces, backed up with acrylic, internally illum'd. 9'-0" Sign Body
10'-0" Cap
4'-6"
1'-6" 1'-6"

GAS C-STORE
- This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. - The location of the Disconnect Switch after installation shall comply with Article 600.6(A)(1) of the National Electrical Code.

E-Note #1: All requirements not in sign company’s
scope of work must be in place prior to installation.

E-Note #2: Electrical to be brought to base of sign
(by others) and not in sign company's scope of work.

E-Note #3: Timers and/or photocells for signs to be
furnished and installed by the customer's electrician,
who should also ensure that the completed electrical
system is code compliant.

ALL COMPONENTS TO BE APPROVED

ALL SIGNS TO BE LISTED
___Dedicated ___ Amp Circuits at ________ V 1 1 120/277 olts PRIMARY ELECTRICAL TO SIGN LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. A DEDICATED CIRCUIT WITH NO SHARED NEUTRALS AND A GROUND RETURNING TO THE PANEL IS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION.

ALL TRANSFORMERS/DRIVERS/POWER SUPPLIES SHALL BE (GFI) GROUND FAULT-INTERRUPTED.

REQUIREMENTSFOR ELECTRICAL ILLUMINATION:

NOTE: THIS PERTAINS TO THE SIGN'S INTERNAL WIRING ONLY, NOT THE PRIMARY WIRING.

E-Note #4: Data Line(s) via fiber optic cable shall run in their own conduit for remote updating of prices.
8'-0" 26"
COPY
TENANT
COPY
TENANT
3'-0" 3'-0"
(108"x 54") + ( 72"x 26" )
= 53.50 sq.ft.

CARWASH Page 734 of 888
D: Fuel Price Monument

4.00 Client: Project:

Revisions: Project No:

Date:

Sign Type:

Sheet No:
1 16530 Bake Parkway, 2nd Floor
Irvine, CA 92618
QT0010582-R12(conc)
2024-09-03

RB/LR/SH
NEC of 91 Fwy & W 2nd St.

Corona, CA 92882
A
7 of 7
6'-0"
4'-0"
FRONT VIEW - Fuel Price Multi-Tenant Monument 1 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 4'-10"
Doubled faced, fuel price monument.

Fuel price modules shall be LED illuminated
per national brand standard.

Owner/developer reserves the right
to reconfigure sign panels, provided
that total sign area is not increased.
3"
D

END VIEW
Qty. One (1) Fuel Price Monument
Total Sign Area = 24.92 sq. ft.

Conceptual Only
Cash Gasoline Credit
Regular
Premium
Premium
Plus
Diesel
#2
6"#s
4'-4" Sign Body
4'-8" Cap/Hip
5'-9" Sign Body
1'-6" Cap/Hip
1'-2" Sign Body
- This sign is intended to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code and/or other applicable local codes. This includes proper grounding and bonding of the sign. - The location of the Disconnect Switch after installation shall comply with Article 600.6(A)(1) of the National Electrical Code.

E-Note #1: All requirements not in sign company’s
scope of work must be in place prior to installation.

E-Note #2: Electrical to be brought to base of sign
(by others) and not in sign company's scope of work.

E-Note #3: Timers and/or photocells for signs to be
furnished and installed by the customer's electrician,
who should also ensure that the completed electrical
system is code compliant.

ALL COMPONENTS TO BE APPROVED

ALL TRANSFORMERS/DRIVERS/POWER SUPPLIES SHALL BE (GFI) GROUND FAULT-INTERRUPTED.

REQUIREMENTSFOR ELECTRICAL ILLUMINATION:

NOTE: THIS PERTAINS TO THE SIGN'S INTERNAL WIRING ONLY, NOT THE PRIMARY WIRING.

E-Note #4: Data Line(s) via fiber optic cable shall run in their own conduit for remote updating of prices.

DEVELOPMENT
GR NS Corona Fuel Site
9"
52"x 69"
= 199.83 sq.ft.

Page 735 of 888 ends

EV CAPABLE EV CAPABLE

T T C-STORE
BUILDING N 2ND STREET GAS STATION DEVELOPMENT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY SIGNALIZED CROSSWALK ACROSS 2ND STREET ALTERNATIVE #1 Page 736 of 888

EV CAPABLE EV CAPABLE

T T C-STORE
BUILDING N 2ND STREET GAS STATION DEVELOPMENT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXTEND SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF STREET TO BUENA VISTA AVENUE ALTERNATIVE #2 Page 737 of 888 16530 BAKE PARKWAY, SUITE 200, IRVINE, CA 92618
GREENS.COM
August 12th, 2024
City of Corona
Planning Commission
400 S Vicentia Ave, Corona, CA
RE: Project Narrative and Response to Planning Commission Concerns Respected Planning Commissioners,
We appreciate your time and suggestions at the July 8th Planning Commission hearing, and we are pleased to present a revised project which meets all the concerns that were discussed during our hearing.

The revised development proposes a 5 MPD gas station, 3,725 square-foot convenience store, and a standalone carwash facility with a 130-foot tunnel and 11 vacuum stalls.

Here is a summary of the concerns as shared to us by the City of Corona’s Planning Staff and our update/response to each item:

Concern Response

1. Revise sign program to meet code.

Monument sign on 2nd Street should
be placed near the east driveway,
away from the busier west driveway
(distracting, obstruct view for cars
existing west driveway).

A revised sign program has been provided to address all the concerns brought up during the hearing. The sign program complies with all City codes, and moved the westerly pylon sign away from the onramp based on Planning Commission’s suggestions

2. Evaluate how commercial and
housing projects would impact the
traffic flow in area.

A comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis has been previously conducted, which includes an assessment of cumulative impacts from neighboring commercial and housing developments and has been analyzed by the City’s traffic engineers.

3. Revise trash enclosure to include a
mesh covering on all four sides to
fully enclose the gap between the
block enclosure and cover.

The trash enclosure design has been revised to include a mesh covering on all four sides, ensuring full enclosure.

4. Review potential alternate location
for crosswalk (mid-block) or provide
signage directing pedestrian to
signalized crosswalk to prevent jwalking.

Traffic consultant prepared a memo analyzing three pedestrian access options (onramp, midblock, and Buena Vista). Memo says that mid-block crossing is not safe and creates a false sense of security for pedestrians.

Traffic consultant recommends the crosswalk at 2nd St and Buena Vista, because having a crosswalk at the on-ramp and 2nd Street might not be safe because of cars trying to get onto the freeway.

Applicant agrees to COA to provide a no crosswalk signage at midblock directing pedestrian to actual crosswalk location.

Staff will keep COA for crosswalk at onramp.

5. Evaluate and potentially revise onsite landscaping to discourage homeless encampment/loitering.

Our landscape architect has updated the landscaping plan to incorporate elements that discourage unhoused individuals from loitering. This includes the use of desert plants, rocks, and other materials to deter encampments. We also removed the outdoor seating area on the gas station side.

Page 738 of 888 ends

9/13/24
Page: 2
16530 BAKE PARKWAY, SUITE 200, IRVINE, CA 92618
GREENS.COM

6. Have Police Dept comment on the
convenience store’s location next to
the freeway (“beer runs”).

We will obtain an ABC license for the facility and can not under any circumstance jeopardize our good standing with the ABC board, as it will affect our several active licenses. We do not sell to minors. Every gas station near this site sells beer and wine. Additionally we would follow the Police Department’s recommendations to have adequate onsite lighting, security cameras that record and a FLOCK safety cameras system and granting PD permission to access the cameras.

7. Concern with large tankers blocking
driveways and causing queueing
issues on 2nd Street.

A truck turn template has been prepared to ensure efficient circulation of fuel tankers on-site. Additionally, fueling operations are scheduled during night-time hours to avoid potential disruptions to daytime customers.

8. Evaluate possible restrictions to
design and operations of drivethrough that would prevent queuing/spillage of cars into other
areas of the site and 2nd Street.

Evaluate alternative uses to replace
the drive-through use
In response to Planning Commission’s feedback about the “end-user”, the drive-thru concept has been replaced with a standalone carwash facility.

Greens Development will manage and operate the carwash. This use is complementary to the gas station. There will not be any branding or franchising of this facility. The revised site plan excluding the drive-thru and removing 4 of the 14 fueling positions, and replacing it with 10 fueling positions, and a stand-alone car wash results in less traffic to the overall site.

9. Evaluate potentially replacing
wrought iron fence with block wall
along freeway perimeter.

We prefer to not do a block wall, as it attracts graffiti, and opt to keep the wrought-iron fence as proposed.

We have worked closely with our consultants - architect, civil engineer, landscape architect, environmental consultant, and traffic engineer to revise the site plan and supporting documents. We have developed a viable alternative to the original drive-thru concept, which addresses all concerns from the July 8th Planning Commission hearing. We look forward to presenting to you at the upcoming September 23rd hearing.

Best Regards,
Atman Kadakia
Greens | Managing Principal
16530 Bake Parkway, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618
M: (949) 322-1760 | [email protected]

Page 739 of 888 ends

CITY OF CORONA

ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

FOR THE CORONA C-STORE AND GAS STATION PROJECT
NAME AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:

PP2023-0007: Precise Plan application to review the site plan, architecture, landscaping associate with the development of a 4,110-square-foot automated carwash with 11 vacuum stalls, gas station with five double-sided fuel pumps, and a 3,725-square-foot convenience store on 1.40 acres in the C-3 (General Commercial) zone.

CUP2024-0006: Conditional Use Permit application for a 4,110-square-foot automated carwash with 11 vacuum stalls proposed as part of a commercial development consisting of a gas station and convenience store on 1.40 acres in the C-3 (General Commercial) zone.

PROJECT LOCATION:

The project is located on the north side of 2nd Street, west of Buena Vista Avenue and east of the State Route 91 eastbound on-ramp.

ENTITY OR PERSON UNDERTAKING PROJECT:

Greens Development Inc.
16530 Bake Parkway, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
The Planning and Housing Commission, having reviewed the initial study of this proposed project and the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the Commission, and having heard, at a public meeting of the Commission, the comments of any and all concerned persons or entities, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find that the proposed project may have potentially significant effects on the environment, but mitigation measures or revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects will occur. Therefore, the Planning and Housing hereby finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgment and shall be adopted.

The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Lead Agency based its decision to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration are as follows:

Corona City Hall, Planning and Development Department, 400 S. Vicentia Avenue, Corona, CA 92882 Date: _______________________
Chair
City of Corona
Date filed with County Clerk: _______________________

Page 740 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 2 Environmental Checklist

CITY OF CORONA

INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
PROJECT TITLE:

Corona C-Store and Gas Station 2
nd Street Development
• Precise Plan 2023-0007 (PP2023-0007) and
• Conditional Use Permit 2024-0006 (CUP2024-0006)
PROJECT LOCATION:

The project site is comprised of two contiguous parcels totaling approximately 1.4 acres, located on the north side of 2nd Street, between the State Route (SR-91) eastbound onramp and Buena Vista Avenue. The assessor’s parcel numbers (APN) are 118-027-54 and 118-027-024.

Figure 1: Locational Map
APPLICANT/PROJECT PROPONENT:

Greens Development Inc.
16530 Bake Parkway, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
BACKGROUND:

The project site is comprised of two remnant parcels that were previously developed prior to the SR-91 widening project occurring in 2016. The western parcel is 0.81 acres and was previously developed for commercial purposes. The eastern parcel is 0.59 acres and was previously developed for residential purposes.

On July 8, 2024, the Corona Planning Commission approved General Plan Amendment 2023-0004 (GPA2023-0004) and Change of Zone 2023-0006 (CZ2023-0006) which were land use applications associated with a proposed commercial project on the project site. The project was for a 1,900-squarePage 741 of 888 PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 3 Environmental Checklist

foot eating establishment with drive-through services, gas station with seven double-sided pumps (14 pumps total), and a 3,775-square-foot convenience store proposed for project site. The applicant of the project was Greens Development. The project included Precise Plan 2023-0007 (PP202-0007) which was for the review of the site plan, architecture, landscaping, signage and other features of the project.

The Commission continued the precise plan proposed by PP2023-0007 to a future Planning and Housing Commission meeting date to allow the applicant time to address concerns related to the project’s drive-through use, traffic, signage, trash enclosure design, landscaping, convenience store, onsite circulation and queuing concerns, and the location of an off-site crosswalk that was required to be constructed as part of the project’s development.

On August 7, 2024, the City Council approved GPA2023-0004 and CZ2023-0006 and adopted a mitigated negative declaration (MND) which was prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Since the adoption of the MND, the applicant has made revisions to the project in response to the public comments that were received at the July 8, 2024 Planning and Housing Commission meeting.

The applicant replaced the eating establishment with a 4,110-square-foot automated carwash tunnel with 11 vacuum stalls, reduced the number of fueling pumps associated with the gas station from 14 to 10 pumps, and reduced the size of the convenience store from 3,775 to 3,725 square feet. The original and modified project are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Original and Modified Project
Original Proposed Project Modified Project
1,900 square foot eating establishment with a
drive-through lane
4,110 square foot automated carwash tunnel
with a drive-through lane and 11 vacuum stalls
Gas station with 7 double-sided pumps (14
pumps total)
Gas station with 5 double-sided pumps (10
pumps total)
3,775 square foot convenience store 3,725 square foot convenience store 5,675 total square feet 7,835 total square foot
PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT:

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, this Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum (“Addendum”) has been prepared in order to identify any potential environmental impacts from implementation of the Modified Project in the City of Corona. The City of Corona is the Lead Agency in the preparation of this Addendum. The City has discretionary authority over the proposed project. The intended use of this document is to identify potential environmental impacts that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project and to provide the basis for input from public agencies, organizations and interested members of the public.

BASIS OF THE ADDENDUM:

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 allows for the preparation of an Addendum to an adopted MND if “some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (or MND) have occurred.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 identifies the following conditions that would require the preparation of a subsequent MND:
• Substantial changes in the project are proposed which require major revisions to the MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
• Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is

Page 742 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 4 Environmental Checklist

undertaken which require major revisions to the MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of MND adoption, shows any of the following:
• The project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the MND. The project would result in impacts substantially more severe than those disclosed in the MND.

Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. • Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

The Addendum need not be circulated for public review (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[c]); however, an Addendum must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[d]). This Addendum to the previously adopted MND demonstrates that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation requirements identified in the previously approved MND remains substantively unchanged despite minor project refinements described herein and supports the finding that the proposed project does not raise any new issues and does not exceed the level of impacts identified in the previously approved MND.

PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EXISTING MITIGATION MEASURES:

Below is a listing of mitigation measures provided in the previously approved MND that are relevant to the proposed Modified Project.

MM CUL-1 Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall retain and enter a monitoring and mitigation service contract with a qualified Archaeologist (“Archaeological Monitor”) for mitigation monitoring services and implement a Cultural Resource Monitoring Program (CRMP). At least 30 days prior to issuance of grading permits, a copy of the executed agreement between the Project Applicant and Archaeologist shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department:
• A CRMP shall be prepared to guide the procedures and protocols of an archaeological mitigation monitoring program that shall be implemented during initial onsite and offsite ground disturbing activities. The CRMP shall include, but not be limited to, the Project grading and development schedule; approved Project cultural resources mitigation measures and conditions of approval; monitoring procedures; protocols for the identification, assessment, collection, and analysis of any resource(s) observed during grading; curation guidelines; and coordination with project personnel, City staff, and any participating Native American tribe(s). The Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians shall be notified of any discoveries. The final CRMP shall be submitted to the City Project planner and/or inspector, the appropriate Project supervisor/engineer/etc., and monitoring Native American tribe(s), if any. • The Archaeological Monitor shall be invited to a preconstruction meeting with construction personnel and City and tribal representatives. The attending archaeologist shall review the provisions of the CRMP and answer any

Page 743 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 5 Environmental Checklist

applicable questions.
• Full-time monitoring shall occur throughout the entire Project area, including all off-site improvement areas, during initial ground-disturbing activities. Fulltime monitoring shall continue until the Archaeological Monitor determines that the overall sensitivity of the Project area is low as a result of mitigation monitoring and shall have the authority to modify and reduce the monitoring program to either periodic spot-checks or complete suspension of the monitoring program. Should the monitor(s) determine that there are no cultural resources within the Project site or off-site improvement areas, or should the sensitivity be reduced to low during monitoring, all monitoring shall cease.

MM CUL-2 Inadvertent Discovery and Native American Notification. In the event that a significant cultural resource is discovered during ground disturbance activities, the project archaeologist shall notify the City and the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians for purposes of inviting the Tribe to participate in the CRMP implementation and to observe any continuing ground-disturbing construction activities. Further, all ground disturbance activities within 50 feet of the discovered cultural resource shall be halted and the applicant and a meeting shall be convened between the developer, the consulting archaeologist, the lead agency and a Rincon tribal representative to discuss the significance of the find. Further ground disturbance shall not resume in the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished.

MM CUL-3 Paleontological Monitor. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City of a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (PRMMP). The PRMMP shall include the provision of a trained paleontological monitor during onsite soil disturbance activities.

The monitoring for paleontological resources shall be conducted on a full-time basis during the rough grading phases of the Project site within native soils that have the potential to harbor paleontological resources. The paleontological monitor shall be equipped to rapidly remove any large fossil specimens encountered during excavation. During monitoring, samples of soil shall be collected and processed to recover micro-vertebrate fossils. Processing shall include wet screen washing and microscopic examination of the residual materials to identify small vertebrate remains. If paleontological resources are unearthed or discovered during grading activities, the following recovery processes shall apply:
• Upon encountering a large deposit of bone, salvage of all bone in the area shall be conducted with additional field staff and in accordance with modern paleontological techniques.
• All fossils collected during the project shall be prepared to a reasonable point of identification. Excess sediment or matrix shall be removed from the specimens to reduce the bulk and cost of storage. Itemized catalogs of all material collected and identified shall be provided to the museum repository along with the specimens.
• A report documenting the results of the monitoring and salvage activities and the significance of the fossils shall be prepared.
• All fossils collected during this work, along with the itemized inventory of these specimens, shall be deposited in a museum repository (such as the

Page 744 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 6 Environmental Checklist

Western Science Center for Archaeology & Paleontology, the Riverside Metropolitan Museum, or the San Bernardino County Museum) for permanent curation and storage.

MM CUL-4 Discovery of Human Remains: In the event that human remains (or remains that may be human) are discovered at the project site during grading or earthmoving activities, the construction contractors, project archaeologist, and/or designated Native American Monitor shall immediately stop all activities within 100 feet of the find. The project proponent shall then inform the Riverside County Coroner and the City of Corona Planning and Development Department, Planning Division, immediately, and the coroner shall be permitted to examine the remains as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Section 7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If human remains are determined as those of Native American origin, the applicant shall comply with the state relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the jurisdiction of the Native American Heritage Commission (PRC Section 5097). The coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to determine the most likely descendant(s) (MLD). The MLD shall complete his or her inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The Disposition of the remains shall be overseen by the most likely descendant(s) to determine the most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associated grave artifacts.

The specific locations of Native American burials and reburials will be proprietary and not disclosed to the general public. The locations will be documented by the consulting archaeologist in conjunction with the various stakeholders and a report of findings will be filed with the Eastern Information Center (EIC).According to California Health and Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery (Section 8100), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052) determined in consultation between the project proponent and the MLD. In the event that the project proponent and the MLD are in disagreement regarding the disposition of the remains, State law will apply and the median and decision process will occur with the Native American Heritage Commission (see Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(e) and 5097.94(k)).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR MODIFIED PROJECT:

The Modified Project is a commercial development proposed on two vacant contiguous parcels totaling approximately 1.4 acres, located on the north side of 2nd Street, approximately 450 feet west of Buena Vista Avenue. The site borders the south side of State Route 91 (SR-91). The assessor’s parcel numbers are 118-027-54 and 118-027-024.

The Project proposes three detached commercial structures with the following uses:
• 4,110-square-foot automated carwash tunnel with a drive-through lane with 11 vacuum stalls, • Gas station with an approximate 4,000-squarae-foot canopy with five double-sided pumps (10 vehicle fueling positions), and
• 3,725-square-foot convenience store.

The Project requires and provides 16 parking spaces on-site, plus a loading space, trash enclosure, and signage. Vehicle access to the project site is provided from 2 nd Street via two driveways proposed
at the site’s south perimeter.

Page 745 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 7 Environmental Checklist

Figure 2: Site Plan of Modified Project
The overall site plan, architecture, landscaping and other features of the development require the approval of a precise plan. The carwash requires the approval of a conditional use permit. The entitlements which the applicant is seeking approval for include:
• Precise Plan 2023-0007 and
• Conditional Use Permit 2024-0006.

With development of the Modified Project, the applicant is required to construct two raised medians on 2 nd Street along the Project frontage to facilitate site access for east bound traffic. Due to the raised medians, the west project driveway will be restricted to right-in and right-out turn movements. The east project driveway will have full turn movements. In addition, the applicant is required to construct the missing public improvements along the Modified Project frontage adjacent to 2nd Street which include the construction of the missing roadway pavement, curb and gutter, and a six-foot wide sidewalk on the north half of 2nd Street. The Modified Project is also required to construct a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of 2nd Street and the SR-91 eastbound on-ramp. This will require coordination between the applicant and Caltrans to ensure that the crosswalk does not conflict with Caltrans traffic signals at this intersection. As an alternative, should Caltrans not permit the crosswalk, the applicant will be required to construct a sidewalk along the north side of 2nd Street from the project’s eastern limits to Buena Vista Avenue.

Per the City’s General Plan, the project site is zoned C-3 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The zoning and General Plan designation permit the proposed commercial use.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:

CEQA Guidelines §15125 establishes requirements for defining the environmental setting to which the environmental effects of a proposed project must be compared. The environmental setting is defined as “…the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the

Page 746 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 8 Environmental Checklist

Notice of Preparation is published, or if no Notice of Preparation is published, at the time the environmental analysis is commenced…” (CEQA Guidelines §15125[a]). Because a Notice of Preparation was not required, the environmental setting for the Project is April 11, 2024, which is the date that the Project’s environmental analysis commenced.

Site Description: The project site’s prior uses included an automobile dealership and a mobile home park which were demolished prior to the SR-91 expansion project in 2016. In recent years, the site has been used for soil and equipment storage for construction. The project site was previously graded with a minor slope on the north side of the site, on-site elevations range from 650 feet in the west to 640 feet in the east. The remainder of the site is relatively flat and characterized as disturbed with ruderal plants. The site drains towards 2nd Street.

Site Surroundings: The project site is located on the north side of 2nd Street; it is the only property between Buena Vista Avenue and SR-91 eastbound on-ramp. SR-91 abuts the project site to the north, and beyond the SR-91 to the north are commercial uses and a mobile home park. To the west is the SR-91 on- and off-ramps. To the east is Buena Vista Avenue with multiple family residential uses beyond. To the southeast across 2nd Street is a vacant property zoned R-3. To the southwest across 2 nd Street is a commercial retail center zoned C-3. Table 1 shows the on-site and adjacent land uses, General Plan land use designations, and zoning classifications.

Table 2: Land Uses, Existing General Plan Land Use Designations, and Zoning Classifications
Location Current Land Use General Plan Land Use/Zoning Designations Project Site Vacant Land General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (C-3) North SR-91 Freeway N/A
Southeast Multiple Family Residential High Density Residential (HDR)/Multiple Family Residential (R-3)
Southwest Commercial Retail Center General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (C-3) East Multiple Family Residential High Density Residential (HDR)/Multiple Family Residential (R-3)
West Vacant Land SR-91 Freeway on-ramp
Source: Field inspection, City of Corona General Plan Land Use & Zoning District Map.

GENERAL PLAN \ ZONING:

Per the city’s zoning map and General Plan land use map, the project site is zoned C-3 (General Commercial) and has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC), respectively.

The C-3 zone permits the proposed gas station and convenience store by right and requires the approval of a precise plan. A separate approval of a conditional use permit is required for the carwash.

The GC designation permits a range of commercial uses that serve local neighborhoods, the community and visitors. The proposed uses are local serving uses that support the community and visitors alike. Therefore, the project is consistent with the city’s zoning and General Plan. Refer to Figures 3A and 3B.

Page 747 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 9 Environmental Checklist

Figure 3A: Existing Zoning
Figure 3B: Existing General Plan Land Use Designation

Page 748 of 888 ends

PP2023-0007 and CUP2024-0006
City of Corona 10 Environmental Checklist

OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
The Project requires the approval from the following agencies:
• Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and Report of Waste Discharge, California Construction General Permit and California Industrial General Permit)
• Caltrans (Encroachment Permit)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

The City's Staff, having undertaken and completed an initial study of this project in accordance with the City's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)", has concluded and recommends the following:

The proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
__ The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, however, the potentially significant effects have been analyzed and mitigated to below a level of significance pursuant to a previous EIR as identified in the Environmental Checklist attached. Therefore, a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.

X The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects on the environment but revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid or mitigate the effects to below a level of significance. Therefore, an ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
__ The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, however, a previous EIR has addressed only a portion of the effects identified as described in the Environmental Checklist discussion. As there are potentially significant effects that have not been mitigated to below significant levels, a FOCUSED EIR will be prepared to evaluate only these effects.

There is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for adverse effect on fish and wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The following indicates the areas of concern that have been identified as “Potentially Significant Impact” or for which mitigation measures are proposed to reduce the impact to less than significant.

Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Hydrology and Water Quality
Air Quality
Transportation / Traffic
Biological Resources
Mineral Resources
Hazards / Hazardous
Materials
Noise
Public Services
Utilities
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Agricultural Resources
Greenhouse Gases
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Wildfire
Energy

Page 749 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona C-Store 2
nd Street Development
City of Corona 11 Environmental Checklist

Date Prepared: August 28, 2024 Prepared By: Sandra Vanian, Planning Manager Phone: (951) 736-2434 / [email protected]

AGENCY DISTRIBUTION UTILITY DISTRIBUTION
(check all that apply)
Responsible Agencies Southern California Edison
Trustee Agencies (CDFG, SLC, CDPR, UC)
State Clearinghouse (CDFG, USFWS, Redev. Projects)
AQMD
Pechanga; Soboba
WQCB
Other
Southern California Edison
Adriana Mendoza-Ramos, Esq.

Region Manager, Local Public Affairs
1351 E. Francis St.

Ontario, CA 91761
Southern California Edison
Karen Cadavona
Third Party Environmental Review
2244 Walnut Grove Ave.

Quad 4C 472A
Rosemead, CA 91770

Page 750 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona Fuel Site 2nd Street Development
City of Corona 12 Environmental Checklist

Note: This form represents an abbreviation of the complete Environmental Checklist found in the City of Corona CEQA Guidelines. Sources of reference information used to produce this checklist may be found in the City of Corona Planning and Development Department, 400 S. Vicentia Avenue, Corona, CA. fjhh

1. LAND USE AND PLANNING:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Conflict with any land use plan/policy or agency regulation (general plan, specific plan, zoning)
b. Conflict with surrounding land uses
c. Physically divide established community
Discussion:
a.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND found that the original project would not conflict with the land use plans or policies because the zoning and General Plan designation of the project would permit the proposed commercial uses for the project site.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The Modified Project would not result in any conflicts with the city’s land use plan or policies because the proposed land uses are permitted by right in the C-3 zone and GC General Plan land use designation.

Specifically, the C-3 zone permits the proposed gas station and convenience store by right and requires the review of a precise plan for these types of uses. A separate approval of a conditional use permit is required for the carwash. The GC designation permits a range of commercial uses that serve local neighborhoods, the community and visitors. The proposed uses, including the new carwash, are local serving uses that support the community and visitors alike. Therefore, the Modified Project would not conflict with the city’s land use plans or policies. No impact would occur. b.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND found that the original project would not conflict with the surrounding land uses because the project site is located adjacent to the eastbound SR-91 and is near general commercial uses. Furthermore, the existing residential uses located to the east and north are buffered by Buena Vista Avenue and the SR-91, respectively.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: Implementation of the Modified Project would not result in conflicts with the surrounding land uses because the proposed land use remains commercial as previously analyzed in the prior MND. The surrounding land uses consists of commercial and residential uses. Furthermore, the existing residential uses located to the east and north are buffered by Buena Vista Avenue and the SR-91, respectively. No impact would occur. c.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND found that the original project would not physically divide the established neighborhood because the project site is located on a vacate site adjacent to the SR-91 and is separated from the surrounding developments by 2nd Street, Buena Vista Avenue and the SR-91 on- and off-ramps. As such, no impacts would occur.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: Implementation of the Modified Project would not increase the potential to physically divide the established neighborhood because the Modified Project is proposed on the same project site that was previously analysis.

Therefore, no impacts would occur.

Page 751 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona Fuel Site 2nd Street Development
City of Corona 13 Environmental Checklist

2. POPULATION AND HOUSING:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Induce substantial growth
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people Discussion:
a.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND found that the project would not induce substantial growth, nor would it displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people because the project site is vacant and is proposed for commercial purposes. Therefore, no impact would occur.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The project site continues to be vacant and the proposed land use associated with the Modified Project continues to remain commercial. Therefore, the Modified Project would not induce substantial growth or displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people. No impacts would occur. b.

See discussion under 2a.

3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Fault /seismic failures (Alquist-Priolo zone) /Landslide/Liquefaction b. Grading of more than 100 cubic yards
c. Grading in areas over 10% slope
d. Substantial erosion or loss of topsoil
e. Unstable soil conditions from grading
f. Expansive soils
Discussion:
a.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: Per the previous adopted MND, there are no known active faults crossing or projecting through the site. The site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zone and thus, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely at this site. The project will be subject to city and county local codes, the latest California Building Code (CBC). Therefore, any potential impacts related to fault/seismic failures would be reduced to less than significant impact and no further mitigation would be necessary.

Page 752 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona Fuel Site 2nd Street Development
City of Corona 14 Environmental Checklist

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The Modified Project would be subject to the same city and county local codes, the latest California Building Code (CBC). Therefore, any potential impacts related to fault/seismic failures would be reduced to less than significant impact and no further mitigation would be necessary. The original “no impact” finding remains unchanged. b.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – Less Than Significant: Per the previous adopted MND, the project would involve grading more than 100 cubic yards. According to the project’s engineer design team, grading on the project site would cut approximately 3,400 cubic yards, while fill would be approximately 500 cubic yards. The applicant is required to comply with the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Geotechnical Investigation (Sladden Engineering, dated December 2021). The applicant is required to adhere to the city's grading regulations, ordinances and the grading specifications identified in the soil investigation report to reduce any impacts associated with the grading process, such as frequent watering of the site and cleaning of haul roads. The applicant's compliance with the above requirements will be ensured upon obtaining grading permits from the city’s Development Services Division, thereby resulting in a less than significant impact and, therefore, no additional mitigation would be required.

Addendum Finding – Less Than Significant: The Modified Project would involve grading more than 100 cubic yards and thus, be subject to the same the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Geotechnical Investigation (Sladden Engineering, dated December 2021) and be required to adhere to the city's grading regulations, ordinances and the grading specifications identified in the soil investigation report to reduce any impacts associated with the grading process. Therefore, impacts associated with the Modified Project would continue to be less than significant as previously found. c.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous adopted MND determined that the project would not result in any impacts related to grading of over 10% slopes because the project site is located in an area containing relatively flat terrain.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The “no impact” finding remains unchanged for the Modified Project because there have been no changes to the project site which remains relatively flat terrain. d.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous adopted MND determined that the project would not result in any impacts related to erosion because the project would be subject to the city’s grading regulations established in the Corona Municipal Code as well as a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which would be required to address erosion and discharge impacts associated with the proposed on-site grading. Additionally, the project is required to submit a final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) which would identify measures to treat and/or limit the entry of contaminants into the storm drain system.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The “no impact” finding remains unchanged for the Modified Project because the Modified Project continues to be subject to the same requirements to address soil erosion. e.

See discussion under Section 3d.
f.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous adopted MND determined that the project would not result in impacts related to expansive soils, because based on laboratory classification and testing by Sladden Engineering (Geotechnical Investigation report, dated December 2021), the soil onsite is expected to have a low expansion potential.

Therefore, no further mitigation is warranted with respect to expansive soils.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: Implementation of the Modified Project would not change the original “no impact” finding because the Modified Project is proposed on the same site that was previously analyzed. There is no expansion proposed to the project site that would require additional soils analysis.

Page 753 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona Fuel Site 2nd Street Development
City of Corona 15 Environmental Checklist

4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Violate water quality standards/waste discharge requirements b. Deplete groundwater supplies
c. Alter existing drainage pattern
d. Increase flooding hazard
e. Degrade surface or ground water quality
f. Within 100-year flood hazard area
g. Increase exposure to flooding
h. Exceed capacity of storm water drainage system
Discussion:
a, b, c, d, e, and h.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – Less than Significant Impact: The previous MND found that the project would result in a less than significant impact as it relates to violating water quality standards/waste discharge requirements, depleting ground water supplies altering the existing drainage patterns, increasing flooding hazards, degrading the surface or groundwater quality, and exceeding capacity of storm water drainage systems.

Addendum Finding – Less than Significant Impact: The Modified Project is proposed on the same site that was previously analyzed and the proposed use remains commercial. There is no expansion to the project site that requires additional analysis. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would result in the same level of impact to these areas of concern. f and g.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND determined that the project would result in no impacts as it relates to flooding. AccordingtotheFederalEmergencyManagementAgency(FEMA)FloodInsuranceRateMaps(FIRMS),the project site is not within the 100-year or 500-year flood hazard areas. Development of the project site will not result in a flooding hazard, nor will it expose the site and surrounding area to flooding.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: The Modified Project is proposed on the same site that was previously analyzed . There is no expansion to the project site that requires additional analysis. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would result in the same level of impact to these areas of concern.

Page 754 of 888 ends

Environmental: Corona Fuel Site 2nd Street Development
City of Corona 16 Environmental Checklist

5. AIR QUALITY:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Conflict with air quality plan
b. Violate air quality standard
c. Net increase of any criteria pollutant
d. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants
e. Create objectionable odors
Discussion:
a.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – No Impact: The previous MND determined that the project would not conflict with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan.

Addendum Finding – No Impact: Per the project’s updated C-Store Gas Station Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis (Gaddini Group, dated July 26, 2024), the Modified Project would not conflict with SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan. The project would comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction-source emission reduction rules and guidelines. For localized emissions, the project would not exceed applicable localized significance thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would result in no impacts. b and c.

Previous Adopted MND Finding – Less Than Significant Impact: The previous MND determined that the project would result in a less than significant regional construction and operational related air quality impacts.

Addendum Finding – Less Than Significant Impact: Per the project’s updated C-Store Gas Station Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis (Gaddini Group, dated July 26, 2024), none of the Modified Project’s construction and operation related emissions would exceed the regional thresholds established by the SCAQMD.

Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would result in a less than significant impact. The project’s construction and operational related pollutant emissions impacts are summarized in Tables 5-A and 5-B.

TABLE 5-A
Construction-Related Regional Pollutant Emissions
Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis (Ganddini Group, Inc, July 26, 2024)

Page 755 of 888 ends

Corona City CouncilOctober 16, 2024

Corona City Council
October 16, 2024