Corona City Council
December 18, 2024

14 CUD staff have determined that setting the Cost Limitation using the methodology described below is necessary to ensure that CUD does not lose load and suffer cascading increased costs associated with a smaller rate base, which would have disproportionate rate impacts on its customers and its community.

F. Adoption of Methodology for Calculating Cost Limitation for Compliance Period.

To avoid disproportionate rate impacts for Compliance Period 4, CUD will calculate the budgeted revenues less budgeted expenses (before the incremental budgeted cost of procuring electricity products to satisfy the RPS requirements) and identify the funds available from such amount to concurrently satisfy the applicable RPS requirement, maintain prudent reserves, and offer competitive rates (Cost Limitation Guideline). If the additional estimated cost of full compliance were incurred ($4,156,644), customer rates, without contractual rate limitations, would have had to increase by 9.4%. CUD shall not be obligated to expend funds on RPS procurement greater than the Cost Limitation Guideline or RPS procurement targets.

G. Adoption of Cost Limitation for Compliance Period 4
Pursuant to the methodology for calculating the cost limitation established above, CUD determined that budgeted expenses exceeded budgeted revenues by approximately $5.5 million during Compliance Period 4. Therefore, the cost limitation for Compliance Period 4 has been reached and will be set by the actual procurement expenditures of $3,121,361 in Compliance Period 4.

SECTION 11. DELAYED RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT
On June 9, 2020, CUD signed a 25-year PPA with AM Wind Repower LLC for the procurement of eleven megawatts of renewable energy from the Alta Mesa RP27 Wind Energy Center located in Riverside County. The scheduled COD was January 1, 2022. The renewable energy from Alta Mesa was forecasted to meet 99% of CUD’s PCC 1 and PCC 2 RPS for Compliance Period 4.

COVID-19 pandemic related issues delayed the timely receipt of required permits, significantly increased material availability and costs, and unforeseen interconnection related issues put the project’s viability at risk. The Buyers took all reasonable operational measures to work with the permitting agency and interconnection owner to address the issues. During this period, the project Developer still anticipated that the project would reach COD, which would have enabled CUD to meet its PCC1 and PCC2 RPS for Compliance Period 4. CUD was continually informed of revised multiple delays which made it challenging to plan the procurement of eligible renewable certificates (RECs). The current forecast COD is January 1, 2025. CUD did purchase 8,000 PCC1 RECs, and then the pricing for PCC1 RECs continued to escalate.

CUD has complied with the RPS procurement requirements for Compliance Period l (2011- 2013), Compliance Period 2 (2014-2016), and Compliance Period 3 (2017-2020). CUD again took all reasonable measures to meet the short-term and long-term RPS procurement

15 requirements for Compliance Period 4 (2021-2024). CUD entered into renewable energy power purchase agreements to meet 191% of the forecast RPS procurement requirements for Compliance Period 4 (2021-2024). The continual revised delay in achieving COD for its largest renewable energy power purchase agreement made it challenging to procure eligible short-term and long-term RECs. Because of CUD’s limited customer load requirements, the size of available renewable energy projects and long-lead times to participate in these projects, it was not feasible to contract for additional projects to protect against project delay or failure, and CUD could not have met the long-term RPS procurement requirements for Compliance Period 4 (2021-2024).

Compliance Period 4 is an exception and the continual delay in achieving COD was outside CUD’s control. Once CUD’s largest renewable energy power purchase agreement achieves COD, CUD will again comply with future short-term and long-term RPS procurement requirements.

Based on these circumstances, CUD anticipates utilizing its delay of timely compliance rules for Compliance Period 4, supported by the following findings:

1. Prudently Managed Portfolio: CUD prudently procured a reasonable margin above its RPS procurement obligations by 91%, to protect against project delay or under-delivery. Because of CUD’s limited customer load requirements, the size of available renewable energy projects and long-lead times to participate in these projects, it was not feasible to contract for additional projects to protect against project delay or failure.

2. CUD Projects: CUD has evaluated potential City owned solar projects and has contracted for a project incorporating energy storage.

3. Minimum Margin of Overprocurement (MMoP): CUD utilized a MMoP of 91%, however, because of CUD’s limited customer load requirements, the size of available renewable energy projects and long-lead times to participate in these projects, it was not able to spread this margin over a number of projects.

4. Unbundled RECs: CUD purchased 4,000 unbundled PCC3 RECs.

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Honorable President and Board Members
FROM: Utilities Department
2024-174

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AND

CORONA UTILITY AUTHORITY ACTION
SUBJECT:

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC. FOR

CATHODIC AND CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN

SERVICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks City Council to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Corrpro Companies, Inc., Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System Assessment and Design Services. The services this agreement provides will ensure system reliability and reduce the risk of corrosion-related failures in the City’s metallic pipeline system and other facilities.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Award Request for Proposals 24-042MB to Corrpro Companies, Inc. for System Assessment and Design Services.
b. Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Corrpro Companies, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs, CA, for $200,000 per fiscal year to perform Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System Assessment and Design Services.

c. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Corrpro Companies, Inc., for a total contract of $200,000 per fiscal year for the initial contract term ending on June 30, 2025, with two (2) optional two (2) two-year extensions including the ability to negotiate and execute nonsubstantive changes and extensions, purchase orders and amendments up to $20,000 or 10% of the original contract amount.

That the Corona Utility Authority review, ratify, and to the extent necessary, direct the City Council to take the above actions.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The Utilities Department (UD) is responsible for protecting the integrity of the City’s nearly 172 miles of metallic potable water piping and 38 miles of reclaimed water metallic pipelines within the City’s 732.5 miles pipeline system. There are other metallic components within the City’s potable and reclaimed water system and wastewater system, including but not limited to steel water storage tanks, deep water wells, water booster stations, sewer lift stations, and water force mains within the City’s service area.

Cathodic Protection is a common method used across industries to safeguard metallic structures like pipelines, storage tanks, and offshore platforms from corrosion, using a low electrical current. Anodes, susceptible metal rods placed near the structure, undergo preferential corrosion, thereby protecting the pipe’s material. The isolated system, employing a rectifier to convert Alternating Current (AC) to Direct Current (DC), poses no threat to surrounding structures or living beings. The current flows from the protected structure through the rectifier to the anodes, effectively mitigating corrosion of the exposed metal.

ANALYSIS:

To mitigate the corrosive effects of soil and water on metallic pipelines, Cathodic Protection is commonly employed to enhance their longevity and prevent premature failure or the need for complete replacement. The proposed assessment and design services will implement a comprehensive program to evaluate and safeguard ferrous metal structures within the UD service area. This initiative seeks to extend the service life of these structures, improve system reliability, and reduce the risk of corrosion-related failures.

On May 13, 2024, the Purchasing Division issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 24- 042MB following the City Municipal Code Section 3.08.110. UD received proposals from six contractors for Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System Assessment and Design Services. Staff received the following proposals:

Vendor City Evaluation Ranking
Corrpro Companies, Inc. Santa Fe Springs 1
Alisto Engineering Group Walnut Creek 2
JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. Concord 3

V&A Consulting Engineers San Diego 4
Accurate Corrosion Control Glendale, AZ 5
Farwest Corrosion Control
Company
Downey 6
Proposals were evaluated based on five criteria outlined in the Request for Proposals:
completeness of Response, Work Plan/Work Organization, Qualification of Company and Personnel (Experience), Approach to Safety Measures, and Reasonableness of Cost and Price.

Following the analysis of the proposals’ evaluation, it was determined that Corrpro Companies, Inc. exhibited the essential skills, experience, and staffing required for the successful execution of the project's scope of work. Corrpro Companies, Inc. was able to show in their statement of qualification a clear understanding of the scope of work for the project and showed that they have successfully completed such projects. Corrpro Companies, Inc. provided a compensation schedule for the design of the corrosion protection system based on the criteria established in the bid documents, and their cost was the lowest.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Corrpro Companies, Inc. agreement for Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System Assessment and Design Services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Funding for the recommended actions is available in the Cathodic Protection System Plan for Facilities and Pipeline Infrastructure Operating and Maintenance Project No. 77520 within the Water Utility Fund 570 for Fiscal Year 2025. Future funding will be recommended through the annual budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15302 (c) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Action (CEQA), which states that “operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the CEQA determination” and is therefore exempt from CEQA. This action involves repairs to existing infrastructure to maintain public health and safety. Therefore, is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, and no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: AFTAB HUSSAIN, MAINTENANCE MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: TOM MOODY, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Corrpro Companies, Inc. Professional Services Agreement

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
(CITY ATTY: 05-19)

CITY OF CORONA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
(CATHODIC AND CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEM - ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES - RFP 24-042MB)

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this _________ day of _________________, 2024 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Corona, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 400 South Vicentia Avenue, Corona, California 92882 (“City”) and Corrpro Companies, Inc. a Ohio corporation with its principal place of business at 1055 W. Smith Road, Medina, Ohio 44256 (“Consultant”).

City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing assessment and design services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System – Assessment and Design Services, RFP - 24-042MB project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

2.3 Corona Utility Authority.

Consultant understands that the City has entered into a Water Enterprise Management Agreement and a Wastewater Enterprise Management Agreement, both dated as of February 6, 2002, with the Corona Utility Authority (“CUA”) for the maintenance, management and operation of those utility systems (collectively, the “CUA Management Agreements”). To the extent that this Agreement is deemed to be a "material contract" under either of the CUA Management Agreements, City enters into this Agreement on behalf of the CUA and subject to the terms of the applicable CUA Management Agreement(s).

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
2 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional assessment and design services consulting services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from
__________________________to June 30, 2026 (“Term”), unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the Term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the Term of this Agreement one or more times by executing a written amendment pursuant to Section 3.6.8 below (each a “Renewal Term”). The terms “Term” and “Renewal Term” may sometimes be generally and collectively referred to as “Term” in this Agreement.

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the Term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services within the Term of this Agreement, in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and in accordance with any other completion schedule or milestones which may be separately agreed upon in writing by the Parties. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
3 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All Services performed by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows:

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates Tom Moody, Director of Utilities, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Sarvjit Singh, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant agrees that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants shall have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the Term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
4 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations; Employee/Labor Certifications. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work or Services knowing them to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.9.1 Employment Eligibility; Consultant. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time. Such requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to, examination and retention of documentation confirming the identity and immigration status of each employee of the Consultant.

Consultant also verifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Agreement, and shall not violate any such law at any time during the Term of the Agreement. Consultant shall avoid any violation of any such law during the Term of this Agreement by participating in an electronic verification of work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, by participating in an equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, or by some other legally acceptable method. Consultant shall maintain records of each such verification, and shall make them available to the City or its representatives for inspection and copy at any time during normal business hours. The City shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses related to Consultant’s compliance with the requirements provided for in Section 3.2.9 or any of its subsections.

3.2.9.2 Employment Eligibility; Subcontractors, Consultants, Subsubcontractors and Subconsultants. To the same extent and under the same conditions as Consultant, Consultant shall require all of its subcontractors, consultants, sub-subcontractors and subconsultants performing any work or Services relating to the Project or this Agreement to make the same verifications and comply with all requirements and restrictions provided for in Section

3.2.9.1. 3.2.9.3 Employment Eligibility; Failure to Comply. Each person executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant verifies that they are a duly authorized officer of Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
5 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Consultant, and understands that any of the following shall be grounds for the City to terminate the Agreement for cause: (1) failure of Consultant or its subcontractors, consultants, subsubcontractors or subconsultants to meet any of the requirements provided for in Sections 3.2.9.1 or 3.2.9.2; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with such requirements (including in those verifications provided to the Consultant under Section 3.2.9.2); or (3) failure to immediately remove from the Project any person found not to be in compliance with such requirements.

3.2.9.4 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.2.9.5 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.2.9.6 Air Quality. To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which definition is considered by SCAQMD and CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuelpowered engine. Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.

3.2.10 Insurance.

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Promptly following the Effective Date of this Agreement, but in no event before Consultant commences any Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. Failure to provide and maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the City to terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.10.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
6 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.

Consultant shall also require all of its subconsultants to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage:
(A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability:

Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned); and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, advertising injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used including, but not limited to, form CG 2503, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

3.2.10.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub-consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 Per Occurrence Or Claim, $2,000,000 Aggregate.

3.2.10.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain or be endorsed (amended) to include the following provisions:
(A) General Liability. The general liability policy shall state that: (1) the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection therewith (the endorsement form shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 37 and one of the following: CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38); and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers (the endorsement form shall be at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13). Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way.
(B) Waiver of Subrogation – Workers’ Compensation and
Employer’s Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
7 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work or Services performed by the Consultant. (C) All Coverages. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City is entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by Consultant. Thus, any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

3.2.10.5 Other Provisions; Endorsements Preferred. Consultant shall endeavor to provide endorsements regarding the following provisions, but nonetheless understands, acknowledges and agrees that the following provisions shall apply and that failure to comply shall be considered to be a breach of this Agreement by Consultant:
(A) Waiver of Subrogation – All Other Policies. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation any insurer of Consultant’s may acquire against the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of any insurance policy which arise from work or Services performed by the Consultant.

Consultant understands, acknowledges and agrees that this provision is in full force and effect even if the City does not receive a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. (B) Notice. Consultant shall either: (1) require its insurer to provide thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City before coverage is suspended, voided, or canceled; or (2) notify City in writing that such notice is not available and forward any notice of such actions to the City within two (2) business days from date of receipt by Consultant. Consultant understands, acknowledges and agrees that this provision is in full force and effect even if the City does not receive a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

3.2.10.6 Claims Made Policies. The following provisions shall apply to all policies that provide coverage on a claims-made basis: (A) the retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date on which any Services under this Agreement commence; (B) the insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Project; and (C) if coverage is canceled or not renewed and is not replaced with another claims-made policy with a retroactive date prior to the date on which any Services under this Agreement commence, Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of Project.

3.2.10.7 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigation, claims administration and defense expenses within the deductible or self-insured retention. The deductible or self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City.

3.2.10.8 Acceptability of Insurers. Unless under the circumstances a different rating is otherwise acceptable to the City in its sole and absolute discretion, insurance is to be placed with insurers which are satisfactory to the City and which meet either of the following criteria : (1) an insurer with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A-:VII and licensed as an Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
8 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
admitted insurance carrier in California; or (2) an insurer with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A-:X and authorized to issue the required policies in California.

3.2.10.9 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance, as well as amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this Agreement. All documents must be received and approved by the City before any Services commence; provided, however, that failure to obtain the required documents prior to the commencement of Services shall not waive Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

3.2.10.10 Reporting of Claims. Consultant shall report to the City, in addition to Consultant’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Consultant in connection with the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.10.11 Sub-Consultants. All sub-consultants shall comply with each and every insurance provision of this Section 3.2.10. Consultant shall therefore not allow any sub-consultant to commence work on any subcontract to perform any part of the Services until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the sub-consultant has secured all insurance required under this Agreement.

3.2.10.12 Special Risk or Circumstances. The City reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to modify the requirements of this Section 3.2.10, including limits, based on any of the following: (A) the nature of the risk of the Services; (B) the prior experience of the insured; (C) the rating or other quality or characteristic of the insurer; (D) any special or unique coverage issues; and (E) any other special or unique circumstances.

3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work and Services so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the Services and the conditions under which the Services are to be performed.

3.2.12 Payment Bond. The California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) has communicated to the City that there is a possibility that a payment bond may be required for certain services provided in connection with a public works project. Since such a requirement is currently contrary to the industry standard for the services provided by Consultant under this Agreement and since there is no direct legal authority for this position, the City is not requiring Consultant to provide a payment bond at this time. However, the City hereby reserves the right to require the Consultant to obtain and provide a payment bond for some or all of the Services provided by the Consultant under this Agreement.

If the City determines that a payment bond is required for the Services pursuant to Civil Code Section 9550 or any other applicable law, rule or regulation, Consultant shall execute and provide to City a payment bond in an amount required by the City and in a form provided or approved by the City. In the event a payment bond is required, the City agrees to compensate Consultant for all documented direct costs incurred by Consultant for such payment bond. The Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
9 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Parties shall memorialize the terms of such additional compensation, and any other terms and conditions associated with the payment bond in an amendment to this Agreement.

3.2.13 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Rates & Total Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation, including authorized reimbursements, shall not exceed Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) per fiscal year (“Total Compensation”), without written approval of City’s Representative. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant.

The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 30 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the Term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City’s Representative.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of Chapter 1 (beginning at Section 1720 et seq.) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, as well as Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the Total Compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant and its subconsultants shall fully comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws for their employees and any others to whom such laws are Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
10 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
applicable. Consultant and its subconsultants shall also be responsible for any and all violations and fines imposed on them pursuant to the Prevailing Wage Laws. Pursuant to SB 854, which amended the Prevailing Wage Laws, this Agreement would also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Beginning April 1, 2015, no consultant or subconsultant may be awarded this Agreement unless registered with the DIR pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. The City will report all necessary agreements to the DIR as required by the Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. It is most efficient for the Consultant to obtain a copy of the prevailing wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement from the website of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research of the DIR located at www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/. In the alternative, Consultant may obtain a copy of the prevailing wages from the City’s Representative. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.3.6 Apprenticeable Crafts. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the California Labor Code with respect to the employment of properly registered apprentices upon public works when Consultant employs workmen in an apprenticeable craft or trade. The primary responsibility for compliance with said section for all apprenticeable occupations shall be with Consultant.

3.4 Termination of Agreement.

3.4.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those Services which have been adequately rendered to City, as well as any authorized reimbursable expenses, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation.

Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.4.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.4.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
11 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)

3.5 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically, electronically or otherwise recorded or stored, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). All Documents & Data shall be and remain the property of City, and shall not be used in whole or in substantial part by Consultant on other projects without the City's express written permission. Within thirty (30) days following the completion, suspension, abandonment or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City reproducible copies of all Documents & Data, in a form and amount required by City. City reserves the right to select the method of document reproduction and to establish where the reproduction will be accomplished. The reproduction expense shall be borne by City at the actual cost of duplication. In the event of a dispute regarding the amount of compensation to which the Consultant is entitled under the termination provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide all Documents & Data to City upon payment of the undisputed amount. Consultant shall have no right to retain or fail to provide to City any such documents pending resolution of the dispute. In addition, Consultant shall retain copies of all Documents & Data on file for a minimum of five (5) years following completion of the Project, and shall make copies available to City upon the payment of actual reasonable duplication costs. In addition, before destroying the Documents & Data following this retention period, Consultant shall make a reasonable effort to notify City and provide City with the opportunity to obtain the documents.

3.5.2 Subconsultants. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or its subconsultants, or those provided to Consultant by the City.

3.5.3 Right to Use. City shall not be limited in any way in its use or reuse of the Documents and Data or any part of them at any time for purposes of this Project or another project, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement or on a project other than this Project without employing the services of Consultant shall be at City’s sole risk. If City uses or reuses the Documents & Data on any project other than this Project, it shall remove the Consultant’s seal from the Documents & Data and indemnify and hold harmless Consultant and its officers, directors, agents and employees from claims arising out of the negligent use or reuse of the Documents & Data on such other project. Consultant shall be responsible and liable for its Documents & Data, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, only with respect to the condition of the Documents & Data at the time they are provided to the City upon completion, suspension, abandonment or termination. Consultant shall not be responsible or liable for any revisions to the Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
12 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Documents & Data made by any party other than Consultant, a party for whom the Consultant is legally responsible or liable, or anyone approved by the Consultant.

3.5.4 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by City of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted.

3.5.5 Confidentiality. All Documents & Data, either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement, shall be held confidential by Consultant. All Documents & Data shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used or reproduced by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not disclose, cause or facilitate the disclosure of the Documents & Data to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant that is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.6 General Provisions.

3.6.1 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:

Corrpro Companies, Inc.
23309 La Palma Avenue
Yorba Linda, CA 92887
Attn: Sarvjit Singh
City:

City of Corona
400 South Vicentia Avenue
Corona, CA 92882
Attn: Tom Moody, Utilities Department
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
13 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)

3.6.2 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, to the extent arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged willful misconduct or negligent acts, errors or omissions of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all settlement amounts, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant’s obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.6.3 Governing Law; Government Code Claim Compliance. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Consultant must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code Sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Consultant. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Consultant shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the City.

3.6.4 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6.5 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.6.6 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the Parties.

3.6.6.1 Subconsultants; Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the Services required under this Agreement, except as expressly authorized herein, without the prior written approval of the City. Subcontracts, if any, shall include a provision making them subject to all provisions of this Agreement. Consultant shall also not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to subcontract or take any other action not authorized herein shall be null and void, and any subconsultants, assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such action.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
14 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)

3.6.6.2 Corona Utility Authority. To the extent that this Agreement is deemed to be a "material contract" under either of the CUA Management Agreements, Consultant has no right to terminate this Agreement, either with or without cause, based upon the existence or non-existence of either or both of the CUA Management Agreements. Therefore, if an applicable CUA Management Agreement expires or terminates for any reason, Consultant shall remain fully obligated to perform under this Agreement with the CUA or another third party contracted by the CUA for the maintenance, management and operation of the applicable utility system.

3.6.7 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days.

All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

3.6.8 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.6.9 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

3.6.10 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except to the extent expressly provided for in Section 3.6.6, there are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.6.11 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.6.12 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the Term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
15 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.6.13 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.6.14 Attorney’s Fees. If either Party commences an action against the other Party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing Party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.6.15 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.6.16 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.6.17 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT 2 PAGES]
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
16 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
CITY’S SIGNATURE PAGE FOR

CITY OF CORONA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
(CATHODIC AND CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEM - ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, RFP - 24-042MB)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF CORONA
By: _________________________
Tom Moody
Director of Utilities
Reviewed By: _________________________
Katie Hockett
Assistant Director of Utilities
Reviewed By: _________________________
Aftab Hussain
Maintenance Manager
Reviewed By: _________________________
Yasmin Lopez
Purchasing Manager
Attest:
_________________________
Sylivia Edwards
City Clerk, City of Corona, California
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
17 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURE PAGE FOR

CITY OF CORONA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
(CATHODIC AND CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEM - ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES, RFP - 24-042MB)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.
an Ohio corporation
By: _________________________
Donald E Hake
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
By: _________________________
Danial P Schoenekase
Senior Vice President/
General Counsel and Secretary
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
18 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional assessment and design services maintenance or other general services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described herein.

This scope of services establishes the minimum requirements for providing cathodic and corrosion protection system assessment and design services to the City of Corona. The Consultant is required to meet all specifications listed herein, as minimum, and is required to submit a firm fixed cost for all commodities/services. The Consultant shall fully and timely provide all deliverables described herein in strict accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Contract and all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations.

1. Task 1:

Assessment of the Existing system and the City’s assets that will require future Cathodic Protection Systems. The Assessment shall be based on solutions using proven science and technology that is available to extend the life of the infrastructure and help prevent further corrosion related to failures of pipes, storage tanks and other structures or vessels.

The Assessment Report shall be structured to illustrate the needs in the following categories:
immediate, moderate, and long-term improvement projects. The needs RFP No. 24-042MB Section IV. “Project Description & Scope of Work”, Page 3 of 12 Cathodic and Corrosion Protection System Assessment and Design Services Assessment Report shall include projected costs for the delivery of a complete project for the City’s budgeting purposes for the next five (5) years.

2. Task 2:

Design Services (pricing to be based on a hypothetical project with a construction value of $100,000).
a. Phase I – Survey of the Project Location(s): this shall include verifying the City’s Right of Way boundaries, geotechnical testing (if necessary), utility locations and depths, assess locations of existing equipment and/or suggest relocation of existing equipment when of benefit to the City. Verify and determine what elements at the project location are causing the corrosion. It has been determined at many locations in the City the soil surrounding the metal structures is corrosive.
b. Phase II – Design: The System designs shall use proven science and current technology to extend the life of the infrastructure and help prevent further corrosion related to failures of pipes, storage tanks, and other structures or vessels. The Consultant shall provide Plans, technical specifications, and construction cost estimate meeting the project determined schedule. Design documents shall be provided at 75%, 95% and 100% documents shall be complete for bidding.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
19 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
c. Plans and specifications shall be reviewed by a NACE certified Cathodic Protection Specialist (CP4 certified with CP interference certification) and signed by a California Registered Professional Engineer.

3. Task 3:

Bidding Phase and Construction Support (pricing to be based on a hypothetical project with a construction value of $100,000):
a. Bidding Phase Support: The Consultant shall provide responses to Bidding Phase Questions within three (3) business days following distribution from the City. b. Construction Support:
a) Requests for Information (RFI): responses shall be within three (3) business days of the Consultant’s request.
b) Submittal Review:
1st Submission: 28 calendar day turnaround
2nd Submission: 21 calendar day turnaround
3rd and 4th Submission: 14 calendar day turnaround
c) Consultant’s Pay Application (if necessary): two (2) business days d) Construction Contract Close Out and As Builts.

4. Task 4:

Existing Pipeline and Cathodic Protection System Locations, Location Descriptions and Known History
a. Green River Area: City of Corona Water Atlas Page B-16 the Green River Area distribution piping system was installed from 1985 to 1987. The lines installed range from 6 to 12-inch cement mortar lined and asphalt wrapped steel pipe (CML&AW). The Area is supplied by two (2) 8-inch lines and one (1) 16- inch cement mortar lined and steel pipe. One 8-inch line is coated and runs north to south on the northeast side of Green River in-line with East Fork Road at Feather River Road and interconnects with an 8-inch asphalt coated line located East Fork Road and Pennyroyal Drive. The 16-inch line is concretemortar lined and coated (CML&C) running east to west and is located on the southeast side of Green River extending from a 16-inch CML&C steel pipe feeder running north to south on Crestridge Drive onto the south side of Green River.

Green River Pipeline and Cathodic Protection System Map Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
20 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
b. Glen Ivy Pipeline: UD as built drawings W183 indicate this line was installed in 1977. The line installed consisted of 18-inch and 20-inch cement mortar lined and coated (CML&C) steel pipe per American Water Works Association (AWWA C200/C205). The tie in point for the 20-inch diameter metallic line is at a 16-inch diameter asbestos cement pipe (ACP) southeast of the I-15 Freeway and Ontario Avenue. The 20-inch diameter line continues south along Ontario Avenue until it reaches Cajalco Road where it transitions to an 18-inch diameter line. The 18-inch diameter line continues south along Temescal Canyon Road to Glen Ivy Road where it turns west continuing for approximately 600 feet connecting to a steel water tank at 24650 Glen Ivy Road. In 2019 a portion of the Glen Ivy Pipeline was rerouted below storm drain lines between STAs 272+00 and 272+50 and STAs 260+50 and 259+50 on Temescal Canyon Road.

Glen Ivy Pipeline and Cathodic Protection System Map.
c. Mills Pipeline: UD as built drawings US92-02 indicated that this line was installed in 1993.

This installation consisted of 30-inch concrete pipe, barwrapped, steel cylinder type meeting AWWA requirements of C303. The Mills Pipeline begins and ties in at the Western Municipal Water District Facility, shown as connection WR24, near the intersection of Tom Barnes Street and Temescal Canyon Road. The pipeline is installed along Temescal Canyon Road heading northwest to El Cerrito Road. At El Cerrito Road the pipeline turns west and then heads northwest again on Chase Road terminating at the City of Corona’s Lester Water Treatment Facility.

Mills Pipeline and Cathodic Protection System Map.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
21 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
d. AD – 79 – 30-inch Pipeline: UD as built drawings 86-002 indicate that this line was installed in 1988, included in the installation were 12-inch and 16-inch welded steel pipe per AWWA C200, with CML&C in accordance with AWWA C205. The AD-79 30-inch pipeline begins at its tie in at the 24-inch pipeline (CML&C) near the intersection of East 10th Street and South Joy Street. The pipeline then proceeds east along 10th Street, then north on Grand Blvd., then proceeding east again in Quarry Street and Sampson Avenue, then north on McKinley Street, east on Promenade Avenue then north along Hamilton Drive in the right of way and terminates at the Cresta Verde Water Storage Tank.

Following the installation of the 30-inch pipeline many post construction connections have been made using dissimilar pipe materials and coating types. The use of the dissimilar materials will be anodic to the CML&C line causing premature end service life and corrosion. At station 99+80 which is the intersection of Grand Blvd. and Quarry Street (as built drawing 91-017) indicated that a 12-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) connection was constructed.

The Corrosion monitoring system for this pipeline consist of 2 and 4 wire test stations.

The 4 wire test stations monitor buried insulating flange kits that segment the pipeline.

The electrical continuity across rubber gasket joints is maintained by Z-bar joint bonds.

However, provisions for electrical continuity across in line valves or other in line specialty devices were not provided during the pipeline construction.

AD – 79 – 30” Pipeline and Cathodic Protection System Map Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
22 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Task 5
Existing City Facilities and Structures
A current list of the City’s Assets, which include the following but are not limited to, not all of these Assets have Cathodic Protection Systems at this time:
• 540 test stations
• Two (2) rectifiers
• Twelve (12) anodes
• Five (5) steel water storage tanks
• Two (2) steel treatment facility backwash tanks
• Twenty-three (23) potable water booster stations
• One (1) clear well booster station at the desalter facility • 55 miles of potable watermains ranging in size from 2” to 36” in diameter • The potable water system may have services lines that are smaller than 2”in diameter that will require testing and potential replacement. • Two (2) reclaimed water booster stations.
• The reclaimed water system has watermains varying in size from 8” to 24”. • Seven (7) Smith & Loveless can style lift stations.
• Sixteen (16) additional force mains from other sewer lift stations in the City Identify City Assets such as metal lift stations, tanks, etc. that do not have monitoring or mitigation systems installed in the Assessment Report.

Task 6.

Utilities Department Facilities List provided on following pages Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD
\02000.50101\1401461.15
23 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD
\02000.50101\1401461.15
24 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD
\02000.50101\1401461.15
25 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
26 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall complete the Services within the Term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other reasonable schedules and deadlines established by City’s Representative.

Permissible work hours when working within City Facilities and Improvements are:

City reserves the right, at City’s sole discretion, to extend the agreements with each contracted contractor for annual renewal of awarded contracts up to three, one-year periods as referenced below under the same terms and conditions as the original agreement, upon execution of an Amendment to the Agreement by both parties. Should the City elect to exercise its option to extend any agreement for the additional contract period(s), the parties shall negotiate pricing for each such renewal term prior to commencement of the option period. Negotiated price increases during the option period(s) should not exceed the percentage change in the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index “All Urban Consumers for Riverside-San Bernadino-Ontario, CA” (CPI) for the most recent twelve months for which statistics are available.

Increases in labor costs subject to mandated prevailing wage or minimum wage increases during any contract extension term must be supported, at time of contract negotiation, with documentation from the appropriate entity enforcing the increase in labor costs. Contractors must provide labor cost increases to the City a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of contract or amendment term end date.

Contract Terms – optional renewal periods
• Option 1, if exercised, shall be effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. • Option 2, if exercised, shall be effective July 1, 2027 through June 30, 2028.

Permissible work hours are 7am to 5pm Monday through Friday excluding City observed holidays.

Any deviations will need to be pre-approved by the City’s Appointed Representative Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

CA\DD\02000.50101\1401461.15
27 (CITY ATTY: 05-19)
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursement, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates and total compensation set forth herein.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8CD8A1C7-C590-4A43-82A0-E7D111B6AD46 Docusign Envelope ID: 4476D86E-2105-4346-ADF7-773FE34D4490

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Finance Department
2024-187

REQUEST FOR SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION APPROVING A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND

RESOLUTION APPROVING SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(o)(1), the Successor Agency shall prepare an annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) listing the nature, amount, and source(s) of payment of all outstanding “enforceable obligations” of the dissolved Agency (as defined by law) to be paid or performed by the Successor Agency.

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (j), the Successor Agency is also required to prepare a proposed Administrative Budget. The Successor Agency’s annual ROPS and Administrative Budget have been prepared for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. There are no new enforceable obligations included in the ROPS for Fiscal Year 2026 that were not included in the previously adopted ROPS.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-002, approving and adopting a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(o)(1).

b. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-003, approving and adopting a Successor Agency Administrative Budget for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(j).

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Per Assembly Bill 1x 26, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved effective February 1, 2012. Assembly Bill 1x 26 and subsequent legislation, Assembly Bill 1484, set forth procedures and requirements for the dissolution and wind down of redevelopment agencies within the State of California. The City of Corona elected to serve as the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”). Health and Safety Code Section 34173 provides that successor agencies are designated as successor entities to wind down the operations of the redevelopment agencies, dispose of their assets, and pay their debts and obligations. The Successor Agency is vested with all authority, rights, powers, and duties of the former Redevelopment Agency, including the ongoing administration related to enforcing pre-existing enforceable obligations and managing the wind-down of the Redevelopment Agency’s affairs.

ANALYSIS:

Property tax revenues that would have been distributed to the Redevelopment Agency before dissolution are deposited by the County Auditor-Controller into a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (“RPTTF”) created in the County Treasury for each dissolved redevelopment agency. The County Auditor-Controller administers the RPTTF and disburses bi-annually from this fund an amount equal to the approved enforceable obligations and administrative cost allowance requested on the Successor Agency’s ROPS. The remaining property tax revenues are distributed back to the affected taxing entities by the County Auditor-Controller. Affected taxing entities include the City, County, special districts, school, and community college districts.

Pursuant to Section 34177 and 34180(g) of the Health and Safety Code, the Successor Agency will submit the ROPS and Administrative Budget to the Countywide Oversight Board for its approval. Upon approval by the Countywide Oversight Board, the Successor Agency is required to submit a copy of the approved ROPS (“Approved ROPS”) to the California State Controller and the State of California Department of Finance (“DOF”) by February 1, 2025, and post the Approved ROPS on the Successor Agency’s website.

In accordance with the law, staff recommends that the Successor Agency’s ROPS and Administrative Budget for Fiscal Year 2026 be approved and submitted.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The actions to adopt the Resolutions approving the Successor Agency’s ROPS and Administrative Budget for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, do not have a fiscal impact on the City of Corona. The ROPS lists outstanding obligations of the dissolved Agency that are to be paid by the Successor Agency with property tax increment revenues.

Upon approval by DOF, the County of Riverside will disperse funding from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to the Successor Agency in Fiscal Year 2026. The appropriations for the Successor Agency’s Fiscal Year 2026 budget will be approved during the City’s annual budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the resolutions may have a significant effect on the environment, the action is not subject to CEQA. This action merely adopts the ROPS and Administrative Budget for Fiscal Year 2026, and there is no possibility that adopting the above resolutions will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: CHRISTINE THOMPSON, CPA, CGFM, CPFO, ACCOUNTING MANAGER REVIEWED BY: KIM SITTON, FINANCE DIRECTOR
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Resolution No. 2024-002

2. Exhibit 2 – Resolution No. 2024-003

3. Exhibit 3 - Resolution No. 2024-002 Exhibit A

4. Exhibit 4 - Resolution No. 2024-003 Exhibit A

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-002

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR
THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026

PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION
34177(o)(1)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d), the City of Corona (“Successor Agency”) is the successor agency to the dissolved Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona (“Agency”); and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 34179(j) provides for the appointment of a countywide oversight board (the “Countywide Oversight Board”) with specific duties to approve certain Successor Agency actions pursuant to Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code and to direct the Successor Agency in certain other actions pursuant to Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 34177(o)(1) requires the Successor Agency to prepare a “recognized obligation payment schedule” listing outstanding obligations of the Agency to be performed by the Successor Agency during the time period from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026 (“ROPS”); and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code section 34177(l)(2) requires the Successor Agency to submit a copy of the ROPS to the county administrative officer, the county auditor controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time that the Successor Agency submits the ROPS to the Countywide Oversight Board for its approval; and WHEREAS, upon approval by the Countywide Oversight Board, the Successor Agency is required to submit a copy of the approved ROPS (“Approved ROPS”) to the California State Controller and the State of California Department of Finance, and post the Approved ROPS on the Successor Agency’s website; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY

TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

SECTION 2. CEQA Compliance. The approval of the ROPS through this Resolution does not commit the Successor Agency to any action that may have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, such action does not constitute a project subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

SECTION 3. Approval of ROPS. The Successor Agency hereby approves the ROPS in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177.

SECTION 4. Transmittal of ROPS. The City Manager, acting on behalf of the Successor Agency, is hereby authorized and directed to take any action necessary to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and comply with applicable law regarding preparation of the ROPS, including submitting the ROPS to the Riverside County Auditor-Controller, the County Administrative Officer for Riverside County, the Department of Finance, and the Countywide Oversight Board, and following approval of the ROPS by the Countywide Oversight Board, submitting the Approved ROPS to the California State Controller and the State of California Department of Finance, and posting the Approved ROPS on the Successor Agency’s website.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk or his or her designee, acting on behalf of the Successor Agency, shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 2024.

Mayor of the City of Corona, California
ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, serving as the Successor Agency to the dissolved Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona, California, at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of December, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 18th day of December, 2024.

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
(SEAL)

EXHIBIT A

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
[SEE ATTACHED FOUR (4) PAGES]

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-003

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING

SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR
THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026

PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION
34177(j)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d), the City of Corona (“Successor Agency”) is the successor agency to the dissolved Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona (“Agency”); and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 34179(j) provides for the appointment of a countywide oversight board (the “Countywide Oversight Board”) with specific duties to approve certain Successor Agency actions pursuant to Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code and to direct the Successor Agency in certain other actions pursuant to Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177(j), the Successor Agency is required to prepare an administrative budget for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 and submit the administrative budget to the Countywide Oversight Board for approval; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177(k), upon approval of the administrative budget by the Countywide Oversight Board, the Successor Agency is required to provide administrative cost estimates, from the approved administrative budgets, that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller for the fiscal period covered by the administrative budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, SERVING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

SECTION 2. CEQA Compliance. The approval of the proposed administrative budget through this Resolution does not commit the Successor Agency to any action that may have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, such action does not constitute a project subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

SECTION 3. Approval of Proposed Administrative Budget. The Successor Agency hereby approves and adopts the proposed administrative budget for July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 34177.

SECTION 4. Transmittal of Proposed Administrative Budget. The City Manager, acting on behalf of the Successor Agency, is hereby authorized and directed to take any action necessary to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and comply with applicable law regarding the proposed administrative budget, including submitting the proposed administrative budget to the Countywide Oversight Board, and upon its approval of the administrative budget, the provision of administrative cost estimates, from the approved administrative budget, that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The Successor Agency declares that the Successor Agency would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk or his or her designee, acting on behalf of the Successor Agency, shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of December, 2024.

Mayor of the City of Corona, California
ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, serving as the Successor Agency to the dissolved Redevelopment Agency of the City of Corona, California, at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of December, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 18th day of December, 2024.

City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

EXHIBIT A

SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
[SEE ATTACHED ONE (1) PAGE]

Successor Agency: Corona
County: Riverside
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable Obligations (ROPS Detail) 25-26A Total
(July - December)
25-26B Total
(January - June) ROPS 25-26 Total
A $ 5,827,871 $ 556,824 $ 6,384,695

B - - -
C 5,827,871 556,824 6,384,695

D - - -
E $ 4,878,822 $ 3,896,422 $ 8,775,244
F 4,791,322 3,808,922 8,600,244
G 87,500 87,500 175,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E): $ 10,706,693 $ 4,453,246 $ 15,159,939 Name Title
/s/
Signature Date
Administrative RPTTF
Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the above named successor agency.

Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D):

RPTTF
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G):

Bond Proceeds
Reserve Balance
Other Funds

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
$ 41,134,158 $ 15,159,939 $ 0 $ 5,827,871 $ 0 $ 4,791,322 $ 87,500 $ 10,706,693 $ 0 $ 556,824 $ 0 $ 3,808,922 $ 87,500 $ 4,453,246 2 2007 Tax
Allocation
Bonds- Merged
Dwntwn
Bonds
Issued On or
Before
12/31/10
11/1/2007 9/1/2027 Bank of New
York
Bond issue to fund
projects according to
the Redevelopment
Plan.

Merged
Project
Areas
17,717,463 N $ 11,215,567 4,647,352 3,097,738 $ 7,745,090 372,739 3,097,738 $ 3,470,477 3 2007 Tax
Allocation
BondsTemescal Cyn
Bonds
Issued On or
Before
12/31/10
1/1/2007 11/1/2032 Bank of New
York
Bond issue to fund
projects according to
the Redevelopment
Plan.

Merged
Project
Areas
10,728,194 N $ 2,757,772 1,180,519 696,584 $ 1,877,103 184,085 696,584 $ 880,669 5 Fiscal Agent
Fees
Fees 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 Bank of New
York
Fees in association
with TAB accounts
Merged
Project
Areas
6,200 N $ 6,200 $ - 6,200 $ 6,200
6 Continuing
Disclosure
Fees
Fees 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 Willdan
Financial
Services
Continuing
Disclosure FeesTABs
Merged
Project
Areas
7,500 N $ 7,500 $ - 7,500 $ 7,500
7 Consultant
Fees
Fees 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 Willdan
Financial
Services
Arbitrage
Calculations
Merged
Project
Areas
900 N $ 900 $ - 900 $ 900
8 Skypark OPA OPA/DDA/C
onstruction
10/20/2010 11/7/2037 Rexco LLC Tax Increment
Reimbursement
Merged
Project
Areas
973,863 N $ 402,000 402,000 $ 402,000 $ -
13 Corona N Main
Development
OPA

OPA/DDA/C
onstruction
1/18/2011 7/18/2032 Corona North
Main
Development,
LP
Tax Increment
Reimbursement
Merged
Project
Areas
6,447,288 N $ 595,000 595,000 $ 595,000 $ -
23 Affordable
Housing
Agreement

OPA/DDA/C
onstruction
4/1/2006 4/1/2061 KDF Corona,
LP (Wells
Fargo Bank)
Affordable Housing
Project
Merged
Project
Areas
0 N $ - $ - 0 $ -
57 Administration
Allowance
Admin Costs 7/1/2024 6/30/2025 Various Agency staff, office supplies, postage,
phones, equipment
maintenance, legal
(OB/SA), auditors,
cost allocation, etc.

Merged
Project
Areas
175,000 N $ 175,000 87,500 $ 87,500 87,500 $ 87,500
62 $ - $ - $ -
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Contract/Agre
ement
Termination
Date
ROPS 25-26
Total
25-26B (January - June)
25-26A
Total
Corona Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Item
# Payee
Description/Project
Scope Project Area
Total
Outstanding
Debt or
Obligation Retired
25-26A (July - December)
25-26B
Total
Project
Name/Debt
Obligation
Obligation
Type
Contract/Ag
reement
Execution
Date

A B C D E F G H
Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued on or
before 12/31/10
Bonds issued on or
after 01/01/11
Prior ROPS RPTTF
and Reserve
Balances retained
for future period(s)
Rent,
Grants,
Interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and
Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance as of 07/01/22
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution amount 1,722,983 87,482 5,953,785 16,891 240,258
RPTTF Beginning Balance includes unspent
funds in the ROPS 19-20 period and $3,204
Retention Held from a prior year's expense.
2 Revenue/Income
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 22-23 total distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
103,937 45,695 8,711,087
3 Expenditures for ROPS 22-23 Enforceable Obligations
5,953,782 5,283,472
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/23) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts distributed as reserve for future period(s)
3,480,572 RPTTF wired to Fiscal Agent for 2023 Bond Year 5 ROPS 22-23 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 22-23 PPA form submitted to the CAC
184,097
Moved $184,097 of unspent funds in the ROPS
22-23 period to RPTTF Reserve Balance ending
cash balance to be allocated to ROPS 25-26
obligations
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/22)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$ 1,826,920 $ 133,177 $ 3 $ 16,891 $ 3,204
Ending Reserve Balance should be $3,664,672
($3,480,572 + $184,097 +$3); Total Ending
Cash Balance= $6,099,338
No entry required
Corona Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation. For tips on how to complete the Report of Cash Balances Form, see Cash Balance Tips Sheet.

Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)

Item # Notes/Comments
2 Reserve Balance: Bond principal/interest payments funded by RPTTF received from ROPS 24-25 will be applied to Fall 2025 payment (25-26A period); Bond interest payments funded by RPTTF received from ROPS 25-26A will be applied to Spring 2026 payment (25-26B period); RPTTF Non-Admin: Funds will be sent to Fiscal Agent in February 2026 and reserved for 2026 Bond year payments (25-26B and 26-27A). 3 Reserve Balance: Bond principal/interest payments funded by RPTTF received from ROPS 24-25 will be applied to Fall 2025 payment (25-26A period); Bond interest payments funded by RPTTF received from ROPS 25-26A will be applied to Spring 2026 payment (25-26B period); RPTTF Non-Admin: Funds will be sent to Fiscal Agent in February 2026 and reserved for 2026 Bond year payments (25-26B and 26-27A). 5 Estimated expense based on historical annual expenses 6 Estimated expense based on historical annual expenses 7 Estimated expense based on historical annual expenses 8 Estimated expense- Payment amount dependent on assessed values of project Outstanding obligation includes interest accrued through 6/30/2025. Estimated expense- Payment amount dependent on assessed values of project; 13 57 Requesting less than the minimum $250K due to reduced admin expenses.

Corona Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Notes July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026

ROPS 25-26A ROPS 25-26B ROPS 25-26
Expenditure Category: Jul 1- Dec 31 Jan 1- Jun 30 Total FY Successor Agency Staff 54,500 $ 54,500 $ 109,000 $
Cost Allocation/Overhead/Facilities 20,000 20,000 40,000 Materials, Services and Supplies 500 500 1,000
Legal Counsel- Successor Agency 2,500 2,500 5,000
Auditor- Successor Agency 10,000 10,000 20,000
Total Administrative Budget: $ 87,500 $ 87,500 $ 175,000

SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONA

ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
Fiscal Year 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026)

EXHIBIT A

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Public Works Department
2024-200

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH UNITED STORM WATER, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $249,200 FOR THE CITYWIDE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN FILTERS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST-2023-06; NOTICE INVITING BIDS 25-013CA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to approve the Construction Contract with United Storm Water, Inc. for the Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters, Capital Improvement Project No. ST-2023-06. This project will comply with a statewide Trash Provision adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to install, operate, and maintain full capture systems for all storm drains that capture runoff within the City’s jurisdictions.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Adopt the Plans and Specifications for the Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters, Capital Improvement Project No. ST-2023-06.
b. Award Notice Inviting Bids 25-013CA to United Storm Water, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for the total bid amount of $249,200, and waive all minor irregularities in the bidding document as submitted by the said bidder.

c. Approve the construction contract with United Storm Water, Inc. for the Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters, Capital Improvement Project No. ST-2023-06, in the amount of $249,200.
d. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Construction Contract with United Storm Water, Inc. in the amount of $249,200, including any nonsubstantive extensions, change orders, purchase orders, and amendments up to an amount authorized by Corona Municipal Code Section 3.08.050(H) which is equivalent to 10% or $24,920.
e. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $15,154 from the County Service Area 152 (NPDES) Fund 245 to the Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters, Capital Improvement Project No. ST-2023-06.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

On June 2, 2017, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Santa Ana Regional Board) notified the City of Corona that the State Water Board adopted statewide Trash Provisions to address the impacts trash has on the beneficial uses of surface waters. Throughout the state, trash is typically generated on land and transported to surface water, predominantly through municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) discharges. Within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Board, these discharges from Riverside County’s Phase I MS4s are regulated through the Riverside County MS4 Permit (Order No. R8-2010-0033 NPDES No. CAS618033, as amended by Order No.

R8-2013-0024) pursuant to section 402(p) of the Federal Clean Water Act.

The Trash Provisions require MS4 permittees with regulatory authority over Priority Land Uses to select a method of compliance with the trash prohibition. To ensure catch basin locations are selected accurately, the Santa Ana Regional Board recommended each permittee develop maps identifying priority land use areas within their jurisdiction, the corresponding storm drain network and associated drainage areas, and proposed locations for certified full capture system installations. On August 29, 2017, the City of Corona responded, providing the selection to install, operate, and maintain full capture systems for all storm drains that capture runoff from Priority Land Uses in their jurisdictions.

This project is the first phase to install 220 out of 1,200 trash-capturing devices throughout the city’s catch basins that fall within the identified priority land use areas to comply with the Santa Ana Regional Board. The City previously piloted an installation of 4 trash capture devices in Winter 2022 to identify the product that would meet the requirements designated by the State Water Board. The devices are required as part of the MS4 permit and will be included in the new Tri-County MS4/NPDES Permit anticipated to be adopted in year 2025. Compliance with this requirement must be achieved by 2030. The project budget is for device installation only and does not include maintenance costs. This first phase is funded by the City’s County Service Area 152 (NPDES) Fund 245. In a prior year, the City applied to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s annual call for projects and was successfully awarded $1 million to fund the next

phase of the project. The agreement is currently being finalized and will be coming to a future Council meeting for acceptance. Completing the project will help the City meet the Strategic Plan goals for Sound Infrastructure by making necessary improvements to sustain high-quality service delivery by investing in public infrastructure while also meeting the State’s unfunded mandate.

ANALYSIS:

On August 29, 2024, Purchasing staff posted Notice Inviting Bids No. 25-013CA on the City’s PlanetBids bidding portal and formally advertised the Project in the Sentinel Weekly, in accordance with Corona Municipal Code and Public Contract Code requirements for formal public projects. Two (2) bids were received by October 10, 2024, due date and time. The following is a summary of the bids results:

No. Contractor’s Name Location Bid Total
1 UNITED STORM WATER, INC. INDUSTRY, CA $249,200
2 AUGUSTINE GENERAL ENGINEERING,
INC.

ALTA LOMA, CA $544,860
Staff reviewed all bids and recommends awarding the contract to United Storm Water, Inc., as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder based on the Bid Schedule for a total contract amount of $249,200. City staff have reviewed and verified that all licenses and references for United Storm Water, Inc., and all other documentation are in order. Should the City Council award the contract, construction for the project is tentatively scheduled to commence in February 2025 and be completed by summer of 2025.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Approval of the recommended actions will result in an appropriation in the amount of $15,154 from the County Service Area 152 (NPDES) Fund 245 to the Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters, Capital Improvement Project No. ST-2023-06.

The estimated construction cost for this project is outlined as follows:

Construction
……………………………………………………………………………………………
$249,200
Construction Support
……………………………………………………………..………………….. $80,000
Contingency (10%)
………………………………………………………………..……..……..……… $24,920
Total Construction Costs
………………………………………………………………………. $354,120
Construction support consists of inspection costs and staff or consultant time. For smaller construction projects, support costs are usually higher based upon the smaller scale of the project. Staff recommends an appropriation as follows:

Project No. Fund Current
Balance
Appropriation Revised
Balance
ST-2023-06
Citywide Storm
Drain Catch Basin
Filters, Capital
Improvement
County Service
Area 152
(NPDES) Fund
245
$338,966 $15,154 $354,120
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

These actions are categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of CEQA determination.

This project includes improvements to existing structures within the City of Corona.

Therefore, no environmental analysis is required, and a Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County of Riverside.

PREPARED BY: SERENA HINOJOSA, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
REVIEWED BY: SAVAT KHAMPHOU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Location Map

2. Exhibit 2 – Construction Contract

Railroad St
Aviation Dr
Butterfield Dr
Clearwater Dr
Yorba St
Clearwater
Sports Fields
Corona
Municipal
Airport
Field 5
Field 7
Parking Lot

BNSF RR
91 Serfas
Club
Dr
Avenida del Vis
Railroad St
Pomona Rd
Via Santiago
Via Bernardo
Auto Center Dr
Pinecrest Dr
Palisades Dr
Capital St
Bur ning Tree Dr
Northmoor Dr
Bern D
K
r
irkwood Dr
Research Dr
Via Felipe
Paseo Grande
N Maple St
S
Maple
St
W 6th St
West Corona
Station
Cesar Chavez
Elementary
School
Coronita
Elementary
School
Day Family Car
Museum
Coronita
Wardlow Wash
Adobe
Ave
Dove Ct
Mesquite
Ln
Mesquite
Ln
Kirkwood Dr
Applegate Dr
Foothill Pkwy
Mangular Ave
Patriot Way
Peacock
Ln
Adrienne Dr
Dawn Ridge Dr
Rainbow Ridge St
Sage Ave
Antelope Dr
Lark Ln
Longview Dr
Via del Rio
Misty Mountain Dr
Emerson Dr
Green River Rd
Paseo
Grande
W Ontario Ave
W
Ontario Ave
Border Park
Brentwood Park
John Adams
Elementary
School
Rawley St
Corbett St
Foothill Pkwy
Trudy
Elker Rd
W Chase Dr
Mabey Canyon Rd
Wigeon Dr
Teal Dr
Cape Dr
Mangular Av
Deer H
e
ollow Dr
Border Ave
Skyline Drive
Trailhead
Railroad St
W Rincon St
Auburndale St
Bayfield Dr
Alcoa
Cir
Fallbrook Dr
Palos Verde Dr
eenbriar Ave
Nottingham Dr
Railroad St
W Rincon St
N
Lincoln
Ave
Field 3
Field 8
Field 2

BNSF RR
91 91
S
Sherman Ave S
Sherman Ave
Pom ona
Rd
D St
Yorba St
W 2nd St
W 5th St
Harris St
Bluecrest St
W 9th St
Via Santiago
Willits Dr
Border Ave
W 7th St
Commerce St
Pleasant View Ave
Norwich Way
Plaza de Noche
W 10th St
N
Sherman Ave
Pomona Rd
Railroad St
W 10th St
W 6th St
N
Linc
oln Av
e
N
S
mith
Av
e
The Palza on
Sixth Street
Corona Towne
Center
Smith Shopping
Center
Corona High
School
Corona-Norco
Adult School
Jefferson
Elementary
School
Corona City
Hall
Christian Arts
and Theatre
S
Buena Vista Ave
Border Ave
Kroonen Dr
Via Pacifica
Via del Rio
Mangular Ave
S
Vicentia Ave
S
Vicentia Ave
Alsace Dr
Lorna St
Heritage Dr
W Olive St
Othello Ln
Montoya Dr
Via Santiago
Topaz St
Turquoise Dr
Oak Ave
Burr St
W Francis St
W Kendall St
Camelot Dr
C
onejo
St
Hibiscus St
Eureka St
Millbrook Rd
M
acbeth Ave
Horatio Ave
Bridgeport Rd
Galisteo St
Old Hickory Rd
Fairmont Dr
W Citron St
W Rancho Rd
S Lincoln Ave
W Crestview St
Zircon St
S
Linc
oln Av
e
W Ontario Ave
Buena Vista
Park
Benjamin
Franklin
Elementary
School
Letha Raney
Intermediate
Vicentia
Elementary
School
W Foothill Pkwy
S
Buena Vista Ave
S Lincoln
Ave
Rowena Dr
Taylor Ave
W Upper Dr
Douglas Way
Silvercreek Rd
Via Mazatlan
W Chase Dr
Citrus Way
Elysia St
Coral S
O
t
ak Ave
Miraflores Dr
Gro
ve Ave
S
witchback Ln
Vera Cruz
Galatea Way
Hearst Way
Donatello Dr
Stoneberry Ln
Clearing Ln
Stillwater Rd
Dwight
Eisenhower
Elementary
School
Foothill
Elementary
School
Corona
Heritage Park
and Museum
Brentridge
Corona Av
H
e
arrington St
M
ountain Ave
1st St
Parkridge Av
N
e
Lincoln Ave
W Rincon St
Placid Dr
N
Cota
St
Atwood Dr
Forester Dr
River Rd
Hidden Valley Pkwy
H
a
mner Av
e
North Main
Plaza
Gateway Town
Center
Gateway
Marketplace
Hidden Valley
Plaza
Shopping
Center
Parkridge
School For The
Arts

BNSF RR
N Joy
St
E 8th St
Bollero Pl
W 9th St
S
H
o
ward St
W 11th St
W 10th St
E 9th St
E 10th St
W 5th St
Circle City Dr
Ram
ona Ave
E 4th St
S
Victoria Ave
W 8th St
W 7th St
W 3rd St
W Rincon St
W 2nd St
E 5th St
W 4th St
Quarry St
Mesa
Dr
Park Ln
N
Cota
St
N
Sheridan St
E Parkridge Ave
E 6th St
Railroad St
W 6th St
E
Grand
Blvd
North Main
Corona
Metrolink
Station
Police
Department
US Post Office
Troy Lee
Designs
Circle City
Center
Corona
Taylor Ave
S
Belle Ave
S
Belle Ave
Magnolia Ave
Kellogg Ave
Wren
Ave
Wren Ave
E Francis St
E Francis St
W Olive St
E Kendall St
W Francis St
Burr St
E Olive St
E Old Mill Rd
Pueblo Rd
E Rancho Rd
Garretson Ave
E Citron St
E Monterey Rd
E
Monterey
Rd
E Hacienda Dr
Raymor Ave
E Mission Rd
Park
Ln
Dana St
Cottonwood St
Gay St
Greengate St
Ford St
Ford St
Montoya Dr
Beverly Rd
W Citron St
S
M
ain St
Magnolia Ave
Fullerton Ave
E Ontario Ave
E Grand Blvd
W Grand Blvd
Corona Village
Town & Country
Shopping
Center
Kellogg Park
Santana
Regional Park
Lee Pollard High
School
Garretson
Elementary
School
Lincoln
Alternative
Elementary
School
Corona
Regional Med
Center
Rehabilitation
Hospital
Kaiser
Permenente
Medical
Fullerton
Ave
S
Main St S Main
St
Santana Way
Hudson
Ave
Garretson Ave
G
arretson
Ave
Twinleaf Ln
Viewtop Ln
Citrus Way
Encanto St
Mellor St
Viewpointe Ln
Armstrongs
Dr
Salem Dr
Mira
Vista
Way
Alps Rd
Pinehurst
Dr
Grapevine Dr
Bighorn Dr
Exe ter Way
Sonrisa
Dr
E Foothill Pkwy
Mountain Gate
Center
Mountain Gate
Community Park
Calvary Chapel
Christian
Academy
Citrus Hills
Intermediate
School
South Corona
Harness Ln
Allen
Dr
N Te
m escal St
Thoroughbred Ln
Mariposa
Dr
Lucy Ln
Casandra Ln
Rock Springs
Ave
Tucson Ave
Via Blairo
Mandevilla Way
Hidden Valley Pkwy
Parkridge
Ave
Cresta Verde
Golf Course
Corona Ranch
Elementary
School
Corona Hills
91 91
91 15
El Sobrante Rd
N Delilah St
Circle City Dr
Termino Ave
Rimpa u Ave
Radio
Rd
Sampson Ave
Mariposa Dr
Ripchak R d
Cresta Rd
M
ariah
Cir
Quarry St
E 6th St
E 6th St
S
Promenade Ave
Magnolia
Ave
Promenade Ave
Cresta Verde
Golf Course
Pole Position
Raceway
15 15
Beverly Rd
Rimpau Ave
Monarch Dr
El Sobrante Rd
Bel Air St
Sherborn
St
California Ave
Old Temescal Rd
Olympic Dr
Aspen St
Compton Ave
Acacia St
Ridgewood Dr
Turnberry Ln
Stone Pine Ln
Porphory Rd
Magnolia Ave
Fullerton Ave
Sunnyslope
Cemetery
Corona
Marketplace
Corona Pointe
Temescal
Village
Stallings
Elementary
School
Centennial High
School
15 15
15 California Av
G
e
ilbert Ave
Carter Ln
State
St
State St
Santana Way
Taber St
Taber St
Calico
Cir
Fullerton Ave
Cottage Dr
Compton Ave
Salem Dr
Fernleaf Ln
Whispering Wind Ln
Cherokee Rd
Spring
Meadow Dr
Conestoga St
Birmingham Dr
Riverbend Cir
E Chase Dr
Radcliffe Cir
Citrus Village
First Citrus
Village
South Pointe
Plaza
Citrus
Community Park
Rimpau Park
Chase Park
Santiago High
School
Susan B.

Anthony
Elementary
School
Crossroads
Christian
Schools
Promenade Ave
Ranch Vista Rd
Saddleback Dr
Terra Dr
Steven Dr
N McKinley St
Promenade Ave
Corona Hills
Marketplace
Parkview Park
Promenade
Park
Rock Vista Park
91 S Temescal St
S Neece St
Sampson Ave
Indiana Ave
Leeson Ln
Blair St
Blair St
Byron St
Brotherton St
Estelle St
Collett Ave
Wagoner Ln
Moody St
Ellis St
N Delilah St
Los Arco
Corona Hills
Plaza
McKinley
Crossroads
Country Side
Center
Home Gardens
Temescal Wash
Sherborn St
All American Way
Cajalco Rd
Rudell Rd
Piute Creek Dr Rising Sun Rd
Poppy St
Poppy St
Wildlife Rd
Diplomat Ave
Consul Ave
Envoy Ave
Quebec Ave
Smerber Rd
Stroh Ave
E Ontario Ave
El Cerrito
%!%¯
%!%¯
Norco
Coronita
El Cerrito
Home Gardens
Riverside
Legend
Catch Basins
%!%¯
Trash Capture Devices Installed
City Boundary
City of Corona
Exhibit 1 - Location Map
Citywide Storm Drain Trash
Capture Device Locations
600 300 0 600 1,200 1,800 2,400
US Feet :
(220)
(2)
%!%¯
%!%¯

CA\DD\02000.50111\10151761.2 1 (UPDATED: 01-19)

CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this _____ day of ________________, 20___, in the County of Riverside, State of California, by and between the City of Corona, hereinafter called City, and United Storm Water, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter called Contractor. The City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the Contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Article 5 below for the following Project:

Citywide Storm Drain Catch Basin Filters Project
Project No. ST-2023-06, NIB 25-013CA
The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

ARTICLE 2. TIME FOR COMPLETION. A Move-in period of 7 calendar days shall start on the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed. This period shall be used by the Contractor to confirm utility locations, turn in project submittals or other supporting documentation for approval and procure the necessary material and equipment to complete the Work. The Work shall commence on the last day of the Move-in period or the first Working Day the Contractor actually starts the Work, whichever occurs first. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 30 Working Days. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT PRICE. The City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of Two Hundred Forty-nine Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($249,200) Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay the City the sum of $2,500 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event this is not paid, the Contractor agrees the City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Article does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE 5. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT. The “Contract Documents” include the following:

Notice Inviting Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Contractor's Bid Forms
Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation Bid Bond
Docusign Envelope ID: AC08C2C8-32C5-4D42-B79F-DF79EC4CD26D Docusign Envelope ID: E8E70CE4-F537-4E9B-A722-11E170B94B49

CA\DD\02000.50111\10151761.2 2 (UPDATED: 01-19)
Designation of Subcontractors
Information Required of Bidders
Non-Collusion Declaration form
Contract
Performance Bond
Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond
General Conditions
Special Provisions (or Special Conditions)
Technical Specifications
Addenda
Plans and Contract Drawings
Approved and fully executed change orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

ARTICLE 6. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW. Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Project.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.

ARTICLE 8. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor is aware of the prevailing wage requirements of Chapter 1 (beginning at Section 1720 et seq.) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, as well as Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Contractor and its subcontractors shall fully comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws for their employees and any others to whom such laws are applicable. Contractor and its subcontractors shall also be responsible for any and all violations and fines imposed on them pursuant to the Prevailing Wage Laws. Pursuant to SB 854, which amended the Prevailing Wage Laws, this Contract is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Beginning April 1, 2015, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded this Contract unless registered with the DIR pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. The City will report all necessary contracts to the DIR as required by the Prevailing Wage Laws.

Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Work available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor’s principal place of business and at the Project site. It is most efficient for the Contractor to obtain a copy of the prevailing wages in effect at the commencement of this Contract from the website of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research of the DIR located at www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/. In the alternative, the Contractor may obtain a copy of the prevailing wages from the City. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

Docusign Envelope ID: AC08C2C8-32C5-4D42-B79F-DF79EC4CD26D Docusign Envelope ID: E8E70CE4-F537-4E9B-A722-11E170B94B49

CA\DD\02000.50111\10151761.2 3 (UPDATED: 01-19)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

CITY OF CORONA
By:
______________________________
Savat Khamphou, P.E.

Public Works Director
Reviewed By:

______________________________
Keegan Olds, P.E.

CIP Supervisor
Reviewed By:
_____________________________
Yasmin Lopez
Purchasing Manager
Attest:
______________________________
Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk
City of Corona, California
UNITED STORM WATER, INC.

By:
______________________________
Eduardo C. Perry, Jr.

President
______________________________
License Number
By:
______________________________
Lydia Perry
Secretary/Treasurer
Docusign Envelope ID: AC08C2C8-32C5-4D42-B79F-DF79EC4CD26D 768583
Docusign Envelope ID: E8E70CE4-F537-4E9B-A722-11E170B94B49

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Office of the City Manager
2024-190

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-110 URGING GOVERNOR NEWSOM TO TAKE
EMERGENCY ACTION TO STRENGTHEN AND STABILIZE CALIFORNIA’S

MARKETPLACE FOR HOMEOWNERS AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INSURANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 2024-110, urging Governor Newsom and the State legislature to proclaim a state of emergency and take immediate emergency regulatory and legislative action to strengthen and stabilize California’s marketplace for homeowners’ insurance and commercial property insurance.

This urgent action is necessary due to the increasing number of policy cancellations or premium hikes resulting from wildfires and other natural disasters.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 2024-110 urging Governor Newsom to proclaim a state of emergency to strengthen and stabilize California’s insurance marketplace for homeowners and commercial properties
BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

On October 16, 2024, Vice Mayor Steiner introduced an agenda item requesting that the City Council consider a resolution advocating for residents impacted by insurance rate increases or cancellations caused by natural disasters such as wildfires. Other jurisdictions, including San Bernardino and Placer Counties, have adopted similar

resolutions urging Governor Newsom and Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara to address this crisis through emergency action.

During its November 20, 2024, meeting, the City Council directed staff to draft a resolution advocating for regulatory reforms and legislative actions to support residents and businesses facing insurance challenges. The proposed resolution aligns with the City’s 2025 Legislative Platform, which includes measures to address canceling insurance policies and rate increases caused by natural disasters.

ANALYSIS:

Rising insurance cancellations and premiums for homeowners and businesses in California highlight the need for urgent action. These challenges disproportionately affect residents in wildfire-prone areas, emphasizing the need for both immediate and long-term solutions.

The proposed resolution requests the Governor, Insurance Commissioner, and State Legislature to consider the following goals in crafting an appropriate regulatory response:
a. Expand coverage choices for all consumers, particularly in underserved areas of the State.
b. Improve the efficiency, speed, and transparency of the California Department.
of Insurance’s rate approval process.
c. Tailor the rate approval process to account for all factors necessary to promote a robust, competitive insurance marketplace, including potential revisions to how catastrophe risks, reinsurance costs, and other legitimate insurer costs are considered.
d. Maintain the long-term availability of homeowners and commercial property insurance coverage.
e. Maintain the solvency of the FAIR Plan to protect its policyholders and promote long-term resiliency in the face of extreme weather events by identifying mechanisms to reduce its share of the overall market in underserved areas and move its customers into the admitted insurance market.

Adopting Resolution 2024-110 reflects the City’s commitment to advocating for its residents and businesses in the face of growing challenges in California’s insurance marketplace. By urging the Governor and State Legislature to take immediate action, the City Council underscores the urgency of ensuring equitable access to coverage and fostering resilience against the increasing impacts of natural disasters.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact associated with the recommended action.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if

the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action seeks Council’s adoption of Resolution 2024-110, underlining the City Council’s commitment to advocating for its residents and businesses in the face of growing challenges in California’s insurance marketplace, and there is no possibility that approving the recommended action will have a significant effect on the environment.

Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: AMINAH MEARS, DPA, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER REVIEWED BY: BRETT CHANNING, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Resolution 2024-110

2. Exhibit 2 – Future Agenda Item Request

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-110

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CORONA, CALIFORNIA, URGING GOVERNOR

NEWSOME TO TAKE EMERGENCY ACTION TO
STRENGTHEN AND STABILIZE CALIFORNIA’S

MARKETPLACE FOR HOMEOWNERS AND
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INSURANCE.

WHEREAS, in 1988, California voters enacted Proposition 103, which established consumer protections designed to keep insurance rates fair and affordable and to ensure a competitive marketplace; and
WHEREAS, insurance rates have been on the rise due to the impacts of climate change, the increased wildfire risk in California, and more insurers pausing or ceasing coverage for properties in high-risk zones; and
WHEREAS, many Californians are being forced into the state’s last-minute insurance program; the FAIR Plan offers coverage at a more expensive rate and less comprehensive plan. Over 350,000 homes are now under this plan, a significant increase from 250,000 two years ago. The average cost of a policy is about $3,200 a year, which is significantly more than a typical home insurance policy in California; and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2023, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-13-23, ordering the Insurance Commissioner to take prompt regulatory action to stabilize and strengthen California’s marketplace for homeowners’ insurance and commercial property insurance. Over a year later, there is little to no relief to homeowners throughout the state, only more who are unable to find affordable insurance.; and
WHEREAS, the Insurance Commissioner introduced the Sustainable Insurance Strategy, a package of reforms to strengthen the insurance industry in California. On June 12, 2024, California Insurance Commissioner announced draft regulations but indicated that changes in the market will not be realized until the second half of 2025, almost two years after the Governor’s original Executive Order; and
WHEREAS, the California Insurance Commissioner has broad authority under the Insurance Code to adopt emergency regulations to promote the public welfare, including under sections 1861.01, 1861.05, and 1861.055 to adopt emergency regulations governing the prior approval process for insurance rate change applications, and to adopt emergency regulations under section 11346.1 of Government Code and section 12921.7 of the Insurance Code; and WHEREAS, located at the base of the Cleveland National Forest, the City of Corona faces significant wildfire risk at the wildland-urban interface. As many as 15,000 Corona households are within an identified High Fire Hazard Zone; and

WHEREAS, the City of Corona is committed to supporting its residents by increasing access to information on homeowners’ insurance options and promoting communitywide risk mitigation efforts to improve insurance affordability and accessibility; and WHEREAS, the City of Corona requests Governor Newsom to proclaim a state of emergency and act swiftly to restore stability to the insurance market; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Proclaim a State of Emergency. The City Council of the City of Corona urges the Governor to proclaim a state of emergency and that the Governor, Insurance Commissioner, and State Legislature take immediate emergency regulatory and legislative action to strengthen and stabilize California’s marketplace for homeowners’ insurance and commercial property insurance.

SECTION 2. Regulatory Response. The Governor, Commissioner, and Legislature must consider the following goals in crafting an appropriate regulatory response:
a. Expand coverage choices for all consumers, particularly in underserved areas of the State.
b. Improve the efficiency, speed, and transparency of the California Department of Insurance’s rate approval process.
c. Tailor the rate approval process to account for all factors necessary to promote a robust, competitive insurance marketplace, including potential revisions to how catastrophe risks, reinsurance costs, and other legitimate insurer costs are accounted for.
d. Maintain the long-term availability of homeowners and commercial property insurance coverage.
e. Maintain the solvency of the FAIR Plan to protect its policyholders and promote long-term resiliency in the face of extreme weather events by identifying mechanisms to reduce its share of the overall market in underserved areas and move its customers into the admitted insurance market.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution, and the City Clerk shall attest thereto, and this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2024. ________________________________
Mayor of the City of Corona, California

ATTEST:
____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

CERTIFICATION
I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, do hereby certify that foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, at an adjourned meeting thereof held on the 4th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 4th day of December 2024. ___________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

Future Agenda Item Request Form
Future agenda items should be limited to new issues that emerge during the year that are urgent and cannot wait until the next priority-setting session of the Council before requiring action.

Name: Jim Steiner
Date: October 16, 2024
Title Name/Topic: request for city council’s consideration to adopt a homeowners insurance protection resolution
Background

1. What is the purpose for the request i.e. what you are trying to achieve or do? I’d like for the Council to support adopting a resolution addressing homeowners insurance protection resolution, in support of our residents affected by recent premium increases or policy cancellations due to natural disasters.

2. What is the scope of the work you wish to see done?
Approve and adopt a resolution that outlines City advocacy, public awareness and community support.

3. Does this request align with the City’s Strategic Plan? How? Sense of place, High-performing government.

4. What is the desired timeline to have the issue considered by Council? Meeting of November 20, 2024

5. Is the issue urgent requiring action before the next priority setting session of Council (Spring Workshop)?
Yes.

Staff Section (To be completed by staff)
Approximate Staff Time Required: 12 hours
Approximate Cost: $ 750

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Public Works Department
2024-181

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF $197,940 FROM THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR LIGHTEMITTING DIODE STREET NAME SIGNS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to approve the acceptance of the 2024 grant from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program for the replacement of existing lighted street name signs on traffic signal poles with more efficient light-emitting diode (LED) signs and authorize an appropriation from the EECBG Program to the Public Works Grants/Agreement Fund 243. Upgrading outdated lighting systems will enhance the city's energy efficiency and reduce long-term operational costs.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Accept the grant award from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program in the amount of $197,940 for the purchase and installation of lightemitting diode street name signs. b. Authorize an appropriation and estimated revenue increase in the amount of $197,940 from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program to

the Public Works Grants/Agreement Fund 243 for the purchase and installation of light-emitting diode street name signs.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program provides funding to assist cities in improving energy efficiency and sustainability through various infrastructure projects. Although this grant is formulaic, which means a specific amount or allocation is set aside for cities based on population, cities are still required to apply for the grant.

While this grant is not guaranteed annually, the City anticipates pursuing future opportunities for similar funding to continue enhancing public safety and sustainability efforts.

ANALYSIS:

To maximize the use of the funds and ensure the ease of reporting while meeting the grant’s eligibility requirements, the funds will be used to replace existing lighted street name signs at traffic signal intersections with 68 edge-lit LED signs that are more energy efficient. Fifty-seven (57) of these signs are designated in disadvantaged communities, as identified by the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool. The LED signs consume less energy, contributing to lower greenhouse gas emissions and providing improved visibility for enhanced public safety. The project also aligns with the City’s broader energy resilience goals and ongoing efforts to implement sustainable infrastructure. These upgrades are expected to reduce the city's long-term maintenance and operational costs while directly benefiting disadvantaged areas with improved infrastructure.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Approval of the recommended actions will result in an appropriation and estimated revenue increase of $197,940 from the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program to the Public Works Grants/Agreement Fund 243. The grant will cover the cost of purchasing and installing 68 edge-lit LED street name signs, with no additional costs anticipated beyond standard maintenance, which is expected to be lower due to LED technology's increased efficiency and longer lifespan.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

These actions are categorically exempt pursuant to Section §15301 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of an existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the CEQA determination and is therefore exempt from CEQA. The recommended actions are to accept and to appropriate funding. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: RACHEL MCLURE, CIP SUPERVISOR
REVIEWED BY: SAVAT KHAMPHOU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Award Notice

2. Exhibit 2 – Grant Application

3. Exhibit 3 – Final Allocation of Funds

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

US Department of Energy
EECBG Equipment Rebates Application
Application Status:

Project In-Progress
PDF Creation Date:
2024-11-20
Application Information Project Information
Application ID:

IA-0000000959
Sectors Served:

Local Government
Application Number:

EECEQ-00959
Other Project Sector:

Contact:

Savat Khamphou
Eligible Activities:

Replacement of Traffic Signals and Street Lighting
Primary Contact:

Savat Khamphou
Serves Disadvantaged Communities?
Yes
Organization Name:

Corona
How Project Serves DACs:

The City of Corona serves its disadvantaged
communities by investing in their safety, infrastructure, appearance, and economy. Of the 68 edge-lit light
emitting diodes street name signs, 57 will be placed in a disadvantaged community in the City of Corona, per the
Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool.

Teaming With Other Entities?: No
Summary:

Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) have a smaller
environmental footprint compared to traditional lighting solutions. By reducing energy consumption, this project indirectly contributes to lower greenhouse gas
emissions, contributing to cleaner air and a healthier
environment in disadvantaged communities often
disproportionately affected by pollution. LED lights
provide better visibility than traditional lights, which is crucial for pedestrian and vehicular safety. Improved
traffic signal visibility can reduce accidents, particularly in areas with inadequate street lighting, directly
benefiting residents of disadvantaged communities.

Budget Information Program Metrics & Compliance Requirements:

EECBG Formula Allocation:
$197,940
Program Metrics:

Retrofits;Transportation Infrastructure and
Vehicles;Equipment Purchased
Using Multiple Recipients?:

No
Other Program Metric:

Total Teaming Formula Allocation: Applicable NEPA SOW:

NEPA SOW 2
Total Leveraged Funding:
$31,178
Davis-Bacon Signature:

Savat Khamphou

Total Voucher Estimate:
$197,940
Davis-Bacon Signature Date:
2024-05-09
Total Budget Summary:
$197,940
Application Team:

No application teams submitted
Budget Summary:

Budget Summary Entry Details
Budget Summary Name: Budget-001088
Budget Category:

EECBG-BIL:

Other Leveraged Funds (if applicable):

Total:

Budget Summary Entry Details
Budget Summary Name: Budget-001087
Budget Category: Equipment ($5,000 or more value)
EECBG-BIL: $197,940
Other Leveraged Funds (if applicable):

Total:

Other Leveraged Funds:

Other Leveraged Funds Entry Details
Other Leveraged Funds Name: OLF-000367

Funding Source: City of Corona Local Funds
Funding Amount: 31178
Equipment Submitted:

Equipment Entry Details
EECBG Equipment Category: Retrofit Technologies
EECBG Equipment Type: Efficient light sources - LED lighting EECBG Equipment Type Other Explanation:

Address of Equipment Installation: W. 6th Street and S. Sherman Avenue, Corona, 92882-2187 Estimated Installation Completed Date: 2026-04-30
Quantity: 27
Equipment Rebate Covers Install Cost?: No
EECBG Other Type Explanation: Internally Illuminated Light Emitting Diodes Street Name Signs In-House Staff to Conduct Installation?: No
Detailed Equipment Information: Edge-Lit Light Emitting Diodes Street Name Signs 18x72 Fuel Source of Existing Equipment: Electric
Fuel Source of New Equipment: Electric
Other Fuel Source of Existing Equipment:

Other Fuel Source of New Equipment:

Equipment Entry Details
EECBG Equipment Category: Retrofit Technologies
EECBG Equipment Type: Efficient light sources - LED lighting EECBG Equipment Type Other Explanation:

Address of Equipment Installation: W. Grand Boulevard and W. 3rd Street, Corona, 92882-2187 Estimated Installation Completed Date: 2026-04-30
Quantity: 41
Equipment Rebate Covers Install Cost?: No
EECBG Other Type Explanation: Internally Illuminated Light Emitting Diodes Street Name Signs In-House Staff to Conduct Installation?: No
Detailed Equipment Information: Edge-Lit Light Emitting Diodes Street Name Signs 18x72

Fuel Source of Existing Equipment: Electric
Fuel Source of New Equipment: Electric
Other Fuel Source of Existing Equipment:

Other Fuel Source of New Equipment:

1 FINAL ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP)
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ATTACHMENT 1A: DOE FORMULA GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

FOR THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT (EECBG) PROGRAM This document presents the final formula grant funding allocations by Local Government (Table 1a) for the EECBG Program - Sec. 40552(b) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021.

Table 1a. FINAL EECBG Program Formula Grant Funding Allocations to Local Governments Listed Alphabetically by State and Local Government
# State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
Total (Local Governments) $299,200,000
1 AK Aleutians East County $75,120
2 AK Fairbanks North Star County $77,080
3 AK Haines County $75,080
4 AK Kenai Peninsula County $76,770
5 AK Ketchikan Gateway County $75,180
6 AK Kodiak Island County $75,250
7 AK Matanuska-Susitna County $77,960
8 AK North Slope County $75,430
9 AK Northwest Arctic County $75,270
10 AK Petersburg County $75,120
11 AK Anchorage City $300,250
12 AK Bethel City $75,220
13 AK Fairbanks City $76,260
14 AK Juneau, City and Borough of City $76,130
15 AK Kenai City $75,270
16 AK Ketchikan City $75,300
17 AK Kodiak City $75,210
18 AK Palmer City $75,250
19 AK Sitka City $75,300
20 AK Wasilla City $75,390
21 AL Baldwin County $246,150
22 AL Calhoun County $79,030
23 AL Etowah County $78,540
24 AL Jefferson County $348,100
25 AL Lee County $78,040

2 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
26 AL Madison County $79,430
27 AL Marshall County $78,390
28 AL Mobile County $239,310
29 AL Shelby County $81,530
30 AL Tuscaloosa County $79,010
31 AL Auburn City $131,740
32 AL Birmingham City $252,880
33 AL Decatur City $120,360
34 AL Dothan City $132,400
35 AL Florence City $76,520
36 AL Hoover City $144,130
37 AL Huntsville City $247,820
38 AL Madison City $116,470
39 AL Mobile City $229,820
40 AL Montgomery City $236,570
41 AL Phenix City City $76,270
42 AL Prattville City $76,260
43 AL Tuscaloosa City $158,340
44 AL Vestavia Hills City $76,300
45 AR Benton County $79,920
46 AR Crawford County $77,050
47 AR Faulkner County $76,890
48 AR Garland County $77,030
49 AR Lonoke County $77,380
50 AR Pope County $77,230
51 AR Pulaski County $79,400
52 AR Saline County $77,800
53 AR Washington County $77,520
54 AR White County $77,650
55 AR Benton City $76,200
56 AR Bentonville City $121,190
57 AR Conway City $125,490
58 AR Fayetteville City $148,500
59 AR Fort Smith City $148,220
60 AR Hot Springs City $76,460
61 AR Jonesboro City $137,970
62 AR Little Rock City $245,540
63 AR North Little Rock City $128,080

3 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
64 AR Pine Bluff City $76,490
65 AR Rogers City $129,880
66 AR Springdale City $139,790
67 AZ Apache County $77,340
68 AZ Cochise County $77,740
69 AZ Coconino County $77,340
70 AZ Maricopa County $378,940
71 AZ Mohave County $78,940
72 AZ Navajo County $78,750
73 AZ Pima County $368,820
74 AZ Pinal County $273,780
75 AZ Yavapai County $79,820
76 AZ Yuma County $77,550
77 AZ Apache Junction City $76,310
78 AZ Avondale City $138,310
79 AZ Buckeye City $137,550
80 AZ Bullhead City City $76,400
81 AZ Casa Grande City $117,470
82 AZ Chandler City $283,790
83 AZ El Mirage City $76,130
84 AZ Flagstaff City $133,940
85 AZ Gilbert, Town of City $266,640
86 AZ Glendale City $259,960
87 AZ Goodyear City $144,130
88 AZ Lake Havasu City City $117,650
89 AZ Marana, Town of City $113,010
90 AZ Maricopa City $115,350
91 AZ Mesa City $449,620
92 AZ Oro Valley, Town of City $76,610
93 AZ Peoria City $210,950
94 AZ Phoenix City $1,340,660
95 AZ Prescott City $76,750
96 AZ Prescott Valley, Town of City $76,570
97 AZ Queen Creek, Town of City $116,990
98 AZ San Luis City $76,150
99 AZ Scottsdale City $279,950
100 AZ Sierra Vista City $76,620
101 AZ Surprise City $178,140

4 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
102 AZ Tempe City $236,650
103 AZ Tucson City $504,750
104 AZ Yuma City $150,960
105 CA Contra Costa County $356,510
106 CA Fresno County $336,680
107 CA Kern County $422,980
108 CA Los Angeles County $1,344,700
109 CA Monterey County $287,340
110 CA Orange County $299,440
111 CA Riverside County $477,090
112 CA Sacramento County $539,610
113 CA San Bernardino County $393,590
114 CA San Diego County $526,750
115 CA San Joaquin County $235,280
116 CA San Luis Obispo County $251,850
117 CA San Mateo County $330,430
118 CA Santa Barbara County $231,840
119 CA Sonoma County $233,790
120 CA Stanislaus County $232,020
121 CA Tulare County $227,670
122 CA Adelanto City $76,240
123 CA Alameda City $133,250
124 CA Alhambra City $136,380
125 CA Aliso Viejo City $113,160
126 CA Anaheim City $344,830
127 CA Antioch City $156,140
128 CA Apple Valley, Town of City $130,740
129 CA Arcadia City $119,080
130 CA Azusa City $112,520
131 CA Bakersfield City $379,310
132 CA Baldwin Park City $127,900
133 CA Beaumont City $112,240
134 CA Bell Gardens City $76,310
135 CA Bellflower City $130,040
136 CA Berkeley City $174,290
137 CA Brea City $76,870
138 CA Brentwood City $121,550
139 CA Buena Park City $137,750

5 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
140 CA Burbank City $167,020
141 CA Calexico City $76,300
142 CA Camarillo City $129,470
143 CA Campbell City $76,540
144 CA Carlsbad City $168,480
145 CA Carson City $150,080
146 CA Cathedral City City $112,920
147 CA Ceres City $76,660
148 CA Cerritos City $76,840
149 CA Chico City $153,350
150 CA Chino City $147,470
151 CA Chino Hills City $131,350
152 CA Chula Vista City $271,850
153 CA Citrus Heights City $137,060
154 CA Claremont City $76,300
155 CA Clovis City $161,730
156 CA Coachella City $76,350
157 CA Colton City $116,230
158 CA Compton City $146,080
159 CA Concord City $170,110
160 CA Corona City $197,940
161 CA Costa Mesa City $166,550
162 CA Covina City $113,100
163 CA Culver City City $76,710
164 CA Cupertino City $125,790
165 CA Cypress City $114,160
166 CA Daly City City $146,620
167 CA Danville, Town of City $76,480
168 CA Davis City $124,540
169 CA Delano City $114,850
170 CA Diamond Bar City $114,980
171 CA Downey City $160,140
172 CA Dublin City $127,230
173 CA Eastvale City $123,670
174 CA El Cajon City $155,020
175 CA El Centro City $76,600
176 CA El Monte City $157,090
177 CA Elk Grove City $201,410

6 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
178 CA Encinitas City $122,780
179 CA Escondido City $187,670
180 CA Fairfield City $164,990
181 CA Folsom City $139,040
182 CA Fontana City $230,640
183 CA Fountain Valley City $119,070
184 CA Fremont City $254,040
185 CA Fresno City $494,390
186 CA Fullerton City $183,850
187 CA Garden Grove City $199,300
188 CA Gardena City $122,410
189 CA Gilroy City $118,490
190 CA Glendale City $227,620
191 CA Glendora City $114,050
192 CA Hanford City $118,530
193 CA Hawthorne City $139,570
194 CA Hayward City $197,040
195 CA Hemet City $141,750
196 CA Hesperia City $147,140
197 CA Highland City $115,100
198 CA Hollister City $76,350
199 CA Huntington Beach City $221,630
200 CA Huntington Park City $115,290
201 CA Indio City $140,950
202 CA Inglewood City $153,020
203 CA Irvine City $333,830
204 CA Jurupa Valley City $152,660
205 CA La Habra City $119,850
206 CA La Mesa City $120,950
207 CA La Mirada City $76,610
208 CA La Puente City $76,260
209 CA La Quinta City $76,320
210 CA Laguna Niguel City $121,870
211 CA Lake Elsinore City $125,030
212 CA Lake Forest City $139,450
213 CA Lakewood City $132,670
214 CA Lancaster City $203,200
215 CA Lincoln City $76,610

7 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
216 CA Livermore City $144,230
217 CA Lodi City $125,810
218 CA Lompoc City $76,480
219 CA Long Beach City $423,290
220 CA Los Angeles City $3,114,200
221 CA Los Banos City $76,450
222 CA Lynwood City $123,660
223 CA Madera City $124,630
224 CA Manhattan Beach City $76,300
225 CA Manteca City $135,340
226 CA Martinez City $76,300
227 CA Menifee City $146,570
228 CA Merced City $140,760
229 CA Milpitas City $137,730
230 CA Mission Viejo City $144,870
231 CA Modesto City $241,720
232 CA Monrovia City $76,310
233 CA Montclair City $76,320
234 CA Montebello City $121,520
235 CA Monterey Park City $121,150
236 CA Moorpark City $76,200
237 CA Moreno Valley City $226,600
238 CA Morgan Hill City $76,540
239 CA Mountain View City $148,010
240 CA Murrieta City $157,040
241 CA Napa City $134,780
242 CA National City City $117,750
243 CA Newark City $76,660
244 CA Newport Beach City $149,950
245 CA Norwalk City $149,530
246 CA Novato City $114,990
247 CA Oakland City $405,710
248 CA Oakley City $76,340
249 CA Oceanside City $201,650
250 CA Ontario City $218,330
251 CA Orange City $189,950
252 CA Oxnard City $224,240
253 CA Pacifica City $76,200

8 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
254 CA Palm Desert City $118,040
255 CA Palm Springs City $76,770
256 CA Palmdale City $197,390
257 CA Palo Alto City $141,790
258 CA Paramount City $114,940
259 CA Pasadena City $193,560
260 CA Perris City $134,320
261 CA Petaluma City $121,440
262 CA Pico Rivera City $120,010
263 CA Pittsburg City $128,250
264 CA Placentia City $112,350
265 CA Pleasanton City $140,450
266 CA Pomona City $188,070
267 CA Porterville City $121,930
268 CA Poway City $76,830
269 CA Rancho Cordova City $138,900
270 CA Rancho Cucamonga City $207,660
271 CA Rancho Palos Verdes City $76,370
272 CA Rancho Santa Margarita City $76,570
273 CA Redding City $149,160
274 CA Redlands City $133,300
275 CA Redondo Beach City $127,820
276 CA Redwood City City $142,550
277 CA Rialto City $151,580
278 CA Richmond City $160,550
279 CA Riverside City $325,070
280 CA Rocklin City $127,710
281 CA Rohnert Park City $76,440
282 CA Rosemead City $113,300
283 CA Roseville City $190,900
284 CA Sacramento City $493,300
285 CA Salinas City $195,530
286 CA San Bernardino City $249,590
287 CA San Bruno City $76,430
288 CA San Buenaventura (Ventura) City $161,680
289 CA San Clemente City $123,390
290 CA San Diego City $1,185,290
291 CA San Francisco City $796,610

9 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
292 CA San Gabriel City $76,330
293 CA San Jacinto City $112,830
294 CA San Jose City $834,110
295 CA San Juan Capistrano City $76,220
296 CA San Leandro City $143,300
297 CA San Luis Obispo City $76,790
298 CA San Marcos City $146,690
299 CA San Mateo City $155,720
300 CA San Rafael City $123,900
301 CA San Ramon City $140,000
302 CA Santa Ana City $315,020
303 CA Santa Barbara City $146,330
304 CA Santa Clara City $183,290
305 CA Santa Clarita City $240,550
306 CA Santa Cruz City $125,770
307 CA Santa Maria City $158,930
308 CA Santa Monica City $157,730
309 CA Santa Rosa City $210,570
310 CA Santee City $118,300
311 CA Simi Valley City $166,670
312 CA South Gate City $142,040
313 CA South San Francisco City $129,470
314 CA Stanton City $76,230
315 CA Stockton City $316,310
316 CA Sunnyvale City $199,020
317 CA Temecula City $161,250
318 CA Temple City City $76,170
319 CA Thousand Oaks City $174,360
320 CA Torrance City $194,870
321 CA Tracy City $144,040
322 CA Tulare City $125,790
323 CA Turlock City $130,380
324 CA Tustin City $136,890
325 CA Union City City $128,020
326 CA Upland City $134,030
327 CA Vacaville City $151,450
328 CA Vallejo City $164,850
329 CA Victorville City $173,590

10 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
330 CA Visalia City $182,320
331 CA Vista City $148,840
332 CA Walnut Creek City $133,700
333 CA Watsonville City $115,420
334 CA West Covina City $153,050
335 CA West Hollywood City $76,330
336 CA West Sacramento City $118,520
337 CA Westminster City $140,430
338 CA Whittier City $140,540
339 CA Wildomar City $76,180
340 CA Woodland City $120,960
341 CA Yorba Linda City $124,310
342 CA Yuba City City $127,270
343 CA Yucaipa City $113,510
344 CO Adams County $79,130
345 CO Arapahoe County $80,830
346 CO Boulder County $79,250
347 CO Douglas County $241,260
348 CO El Paso County $259,440
349 CO Garfield County $77,080
350 CO Jefferson County $269,410
351 CO Larimer County $78,670
352 CO Mesa County $77,900
353 CO Weld County $231,790
354 CO Arvada City $163,520
355 CO Aurora City $360,800
356 CO Boulder City $168,680
357 CO Brighton City $76,340
358 CO Broomfield City $131,980
359 CO Castle Rock, Town of City $126,840
360 CO Centennial City $160,860
361 CO Colorado Springs City $443,290
362 CO Commerce City City $121,660
363 CO Denver City $655,720
364 CO Fort Collins City $206,680
365 CO Grand Junction City $129,430
366 CO Greeley City $158,860
367 CO Lakewood City $194,050

11 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
368 CO Littleton City $76,680
369 CO Longmont City $148,550
370 CO Loveland City $134,880
371 CO Northglenn City $76,220
372 CO Parker, Town of City $118,000
373 CO Pueblo City $161,870
374 CO Thornton City $174,930
375 CO Westminster City $159,970
376 CT Bridgeport City $183,780
377 CT Bristol City $119,770
378 CT Danbury City $141,240
379 CT East Hartford, Town of City $114,380
380 CT Enfield, Town of City $76,470
381 CT Fairfield, Town of City $122,250
382 CT Glastonbury, Town of City $76,210
383 CT Greenwich, Town of City $125,290
384 CT Groton, Town of City $76,460
385 CT Hamden, Town of City $119,730
386 CT Hartford City $180,030
387 CT Manchester, Town of City $119,500
388 CT Meriden City $119,600
389 CT Middletown City $76,720
390 CT Milford, Town of City $115,020
391 CT New Britain City $129,710
392 CT New Haven City $184,070
393 CT Norwalk City $144,160
394 CT Norwich City $76,370
395 CT Shelton City $76,470
396 CT Southington, Town of City $76,460
397 CT Stamford City $178,910
398 CT Stratford, Town of City $114,970
399 CT Torrington City $76,200
400 CT Trumbull, Town of City $76,260
401 CT Wallingford, Town of City $76,590
402 CT Waterbury City $159,690
403 CT West Hartford, Town of City $123,890
404 CT West Haven City $115,320
405 DE Kent County $79,060

12 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
406 DE New Castle County $403,310
407 DE Sussex County $227,920
408 DE Dover City $76,570
409 DE Elsmere, Town of City $75,200
410 DE Georgetown, Town of City $75,300
411 DE Middletown, Town of City $75,810
412 DE Milford City $75,440
413 DE Millsboro, Town of City $75,250
414 DE Newark City $76,220
415 DE Seaford City $75,320
416 DE Smyrna, Town of City $75,420
417 DE Wilmington City $135,280
418 FL Brevard County $340,910
419 FL Clay County $231,710
420 FL Collier County $365,750
421 FL Escambia County $276,780
422 FL Hillsborough County $831,960
423 FL Lake County $322,790
424 FL Lee County $368,980
425 FL Manatee County $327,640
426 FL Marion County $299,300
427 FL Miami-Dade County $1,134,700
428 FL Okaloosa County $238,090
429 FL Orange County $807,430
430 FL Osceola County $253,060
431 FL Palm Beach County $652,450
432 FL Pasco County $484,970
433 FL Pinellas County $384,470
434 FL Polk County $481,240
435 FL Sarasota County $309,280
436 FL Seminole County $287,440
437 FL St. Johns County $275,490
438 FL Volusia County $255,830
439 FL Altamonte Springs City $76,660
440 FL Apopka City $114,500
441 FL Aventura City $76,470
442 FL Boca Raton City $166,480
443 FL Bonita Springs City $116,540

13 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
444 FL Boynton Beach City $134,990
445 FL Bradenton City $120,510
446 FL Cape Coral City $214,130
447 FL Clearwater City $169,090
448 FL Clermont City $76,440
449 FL Coconut Creek City $116,970
450 FL Coral Gables City $77,040
451 FL Coral Springs City $172,940
452 FL Cutler Bay, Town of City $76,430
453 FL Davie, Town of City $155,750
454 FL Daytona Beach City $135,860
455 FL Deerfield Beach City $141,090
456 FL DeLand City $76,370
457 FL Delray Beach City $128,640
458 FL Deltona City $139,630
459 FL Doral City $140,950
460 FL Dunedin City $76,240
461 FL Estero, Village of City $76,270
462 FL Fort Lauderdale City $233,060
463 FL Fort Myers City $149,880
464 FL Fort Pierce City $76,720
465 FL Gainesville City $189,820
466 FL Greenacres City $76,380
467 FL Hallandale Beach City $76,390
468 FL Hialeah City $241,570
469 FL Hollywood City $191,390
470 FL Homestead City $132,180
471 FL Jacksonville City $845,350
472 FL Jupiter, Town of City $123,670
473 FL Kissimmee City $135,670
474 FL Lake Worth Beach City $76,410
475 FL Lakeland City $172,390
476 FL Largo City $140,740
477 FL Lauderdale Lakes City $76,160
478 FL Lauderhill City $126,660
479 FL Margate City $116,820
480 FL Melbourne City $146,130
481 FL Miami City $477,720

14 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
482 FL Miami Beach City $144,110
483 FL Miami Gardens City $155,250
484 FL Miramar City $173,180
485 FL North Lauderdale City $76,390
486 FL North Miami City $118,710
487 FL North Miami Beach City $76,420
488 FL North Port City $127,390
489 FL Oakland Park City $76,520
490 FL Ocala City $132,740
491 FL Ocoee City $76,560
492 FL Orlando City $354,540
493 FL Ormond Beach City $76,530
494 FL Oviedo City $76,330
495 FL Palm Bay City $160,090
496 FL Palm Beach Gardens City $123,090
497 FL Palm Coast City $140,020
498 FL Pembroke Pines City $199,350
499 FL Pensacola City $122,770
500 FL Pinellas Park City $118,390
501 FL Plant City City $76,400
502 FL Plantation City $144,340
503 FL Pompano Beach City $164,630
504 FL Port Orange City $120,970
505 FL Port St. Lucie City $221,010
506 FL Riviera Beach City $76,320
507 FL Royal Palm Beach, Village of City $76,270
508 FL Sanford City $123,420
509 FL Sarasota City $125,110
510 FL St. Cloud City $116,940
511 FL St. Petersburg City $275,510
512 FL Sunrise City $149,460
513 FL Tallahassee City $235,360
514 FL Tamarac City $125,590
515 FL Tampa City $413,280
516 FL Titusville City $76,680
517 FL Wellington, Village of City $121,610
518 FL West Palm Beach City $174,630
519 FL Weston City $127,090

15 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
520 FL Winter Garden City $76,560
521 FL Winter Haven City $76,800
522 FL Winter Springs City $76,200
523 GA Cherokee County $239,330
524 GA Clayton County $297,940
525 GA Cobb County $557,290
526 GA Columbia County $80,090
527 GA DeKalb County $457,680
528 GA Forsyth County $259,710
529 GA Gwinnett County $752,900
530 GA Hall County $80,290
531 GA Henry County $249,580
532 GA Paulding County $80,370
533 GA Albany City $131,480
534 GA Alpharetta City $138,600
535 GA Athens-Clarke, Unified Government of City $177,160 536 GA Atlanta City $528,330
537 GA
Augusta-Richmond, Consolidated Government
of City $241,400
538 GA Brookhaven City $116,800
539 GA Columbus City $236,000
540 GA Dunwoody City $116,840
541 GA East Point City $76,290
542 GA Gainesville City $76,780
543 GA Johns Creek City $136,030
544 GA Macon City $198,870
545 GA Marietta City $132,490
546 GA Milton City $76,350
547 GA Newnan City $76,470
548 GA Peachtree City City $76,390
549 GA Peachtree Corners City $76,610
550 GA Rome City $76,460
551 GA Roswell City $147,480
552 GA Sandy Springs City $166,910
553 GA Savannah City $199,050
554 GA Smyrna City $116,410
555 GA South Fulton City $152,310
556 GA Stonecrest City $117,060
557 GA Tucker City $76,430

16 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
558 GA Valdosta City $121,120
559 GA Warner Robins City $135,070
560 GA Woodstock City $76,200
561 HI Hawaii County $228,640
562 HI Honolulu County $844,500
563 HI Kauai County $77,540
564 HI Maui County $80,750
565 IA Cerro Gordo County $76,530
566 IA Clinton County $76,610
567 IA Dallas County $77,020
568 IA Dubuque County $76,330
569 IA Johnson County $77,580
570 IA Linn County $76,710
571 IA Marshall County $76,390
572 IA Muscatine County $76,520
573 IA Polk County $79,550
574 IA Warren County $76,660
575 IA Ames City $128,040
576 IA Ankeny City $124,300
577 IA Bettendorf City $76,290
578 IA Cedar Falls City $76,450
579 IA Cedar Rapids City $185,610
580 IA Council Bluffs City $122,870
581 IA Davenport City $155,580
582 IA Des Moines City $245,640
583 IA Dubuque City $123,070
584 IA Iowa City City $136,380
585 IA Marion City $76,340
586 IA Sioux City City $140,390
587 IA Urbandale City $76,590
588 IA Waterloo City $129,180
589 IA West Des Moines City $131,740
590 ID Ada County $79,620
591 ID Bingham County $76,610
592 ID Bonner County $76,600
593 ID Bonneville County $76,930
594 ID Canyon County $77,320
595 ID Jefferson County $76,010

17 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
596 ID Kootenai County $77,580
597 ID Latah County $76,350
598 ID Nez Perce County $76,480
599 ID Twin Falls County $76,250
600 ID Boise City City $263,780
601 ID Caldwell City $119,140
602 ID Coeur d'Alene City $117,700
603 ID Idaho Falls City $127,230
604 ID Meridian City $162,570
605 ID Nampa City $150,180
606 ID Pocatello City $118,810
607 ID Post Falls City $76,280
608 ID Rexburg City $76,280
609 ID Twin Falls City $115,570
610 IL Cook County $1,072,210
611 IL DuPage County $449,660
612 IL Kane County $286,090
613 IL Lake County $532,900
614 IL Madison County $273,700
615 IL McHenry County $269,860
616 IL St. Clair County $235,430
617 IL Tazewell County $79,520
618 IL Will County $317,610
619 IL Winnebago County $79,530
620 IL Addison, Village of City $76,300
621 IL Arlington Heights, Village of City $133,720
622 IL Aurora City $211,320
623 IL Bartlett, Village of City $76,310
624 IL Belleville City $76,500
625 IL Berwyn City $114,870
626 IL Bloomington City $138,240
627 IL Bolingbrook, Village of City $131,770
628 IL Buffalo Grove, Village of City $76,460
629 IL Calumet City City $76,180
630 IL Carol Stream, Village of City $76,420
631 IL Carpentersville, Village of City $76,200
632 IL Champaign City $144,960
633 IL Chicago City $2,207,610

18 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
634 IL Cicero, Town of City $134,860
635 IL Crystal Lake City $76,420
636 IL Decatur City $131,690
637 IL DeKalb City $76,410
638 IL Des Plaines City $123,530
639 IL Downers Grove, Village of City $117,090
640 IL Elgin City $162,280
641 IL Elmhurst City $76,690
642 IL Evanston City $136,420
643 IL Glenview, Village of City $76,820
644 IL Hanover Park, Village of City $76,200
645 IL Hoffman Estates, Village of City $114,480
646 IL Joliet City $187,350
647 IL Lombard, Village of City $76,600
648 IL Moline City $76,520
649 IL Mount Prospect, Village of City $116,860
650 IL Naperville City $191,690
651 IL Normal, Town of City $115,180
652 IL Northbrook, Village of City $76,390
653 IL Oak Lawn, Village of City $118,340
654 IL Oak Park, Village of City $114,770
655 IL Orland Park, Village of City $119,480
656 IL Palatine, Village of City $124,440
657 IL Park Ridge City $76,360
658 IL Peoria City $166,910
659 IL Plainfield, Village of City $76,500
660 IL Quincy City $76,450
661 IL Rock Island City $76,310
662 IL Rockford City $194,270
663 IL Romeoville, Village of City $76,390
664 IL Schaumburg, Village of City $140,980
665 IL Skokie, Village of City $127,120
666 IL Springfield City $170,500
667 IL Streamwood, Village of City $76,250
668 IL Tinley Park, Village of City $115,960
669 IL Urbana City $76,520
670 IL Waukegan City $141,100
671 IL Wheaton City $115,730

19 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
672 IL Wheeling, Village of City $76,360
673 IN Allen County $79,000
674 IN Elkhart County $80,390
675 IN Hancock County $77,620
676 IN Hendricks County $80,860
677 IN Johnson County $78,180
678 IN Kosciusko County $77,790
679 IN Lake County $307,890
680 IN LaPorte County $78,820
681 IN Porter County $79,580
682 IN St. Joseph County $78,920
683 IN Anderson City $117,520
684 IN Bloomington City $141,730
685 IN Carmel City $153,650
686 IN Columbus City $117,430
687 IN Elkhart City $121,080
688 IN Evansville City $172,120
689 IN Fishers City $146,540
690 IN Fort Wayne City $281,950
691 IN Gary City $129,280
692 IN Greenwood City $122,730
693 IN Hammond City $133,260
694 IN Indianapolis City $787,040
695 IN Jeffersonville City $76,770
696 IN Kokomo City $122,580
697 IN Lafayette City $134,590
698 IN Lawrence City $76,690
699 IN Merrillville, Town of City $76,300
700 IN Mishawaka City $115,070
701 IN Muncie City $127,260
702 IN New Albany City $76,360
703 IN Noblesville City $125,610
704 IN Portage City $76,280
705 IN Richmond City $76,330
706 IN South Bend City $157,480
707 IN Terre Haute City $123,690
708 IN West Lafayette City $76,750
709 IN Westfield City $76,500

20 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
710 KS Butler County $77,230
711 KS Cowley County $76,200
712 KS Crawford County $76,360
713 KS Finney County $76,320
714 KS Ford County $76,190
715 KS Geary County $76,320
716 KS Johnson County $80,080
717 KS Leavenworth County $76,440
718 KS Sedgwick County $79,350
719 KS Shawnee County $76,710
720 KS Hutchinson City $76,430
721 KS Kansas City City $197,600
722 KS Lawrence City $147,530
723 KS Leavenworth City $76,340
724 KS Lenexa City $123,700
725 KS Manhattan City $117,730
726 KS Olathe City $180,830
727 KS Overland Park City $231,030
728 KS Salina City $76,650
729 KS Shawnee City $122,950
730 KS Topeka City $176,910
731 KS Wichita City $381,670
732 KY Boone County $78,710
733 KY Bullitt County $77,720
734 KY Campbell County $78,090
735 KY Hardin County $77,630
736 KY Kenton County $79,220
737 KY Laurel County $77,190
738 KY McCracken County $77,450
739 KY Oldham County $77,210
740 KY Pulaski County $77,280
741 KY Warren County $76,960
742 KY Bowling Green City $135,720
743 KY Covington City $76,440
744 KY Elizabeth, Town of City $76,250
745 KY Florence City $76,230
746 KY Georgetown City $76,340
747 KY Hopkinsville City $76,180

21 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
748 KY
Lexington-Fayette, Urban County Government
of City $329,300
749 KY
Louisville/Jefferson, Metropolitan Government
of City $690,810
750 KY Owensboro City $123,460
751 KY Richmond City $76,280
752 LA Ascension County $79,260
753 LA Calcasieu County $79,460
754 LA Jefferson County $359,040
755 LA Lafourche County $78,330
756 LA Livingston County $79,590
757 LA Ouachita County $78,700
758 LA Rapides County $77,830
759 LA St. Landry County $77,820
760 LA St. Tammany County $271,950
761 LA Tangipahoa County $79,540
762 LA Alexandria City $76,750
763 LA Baton Rouge City $432,850
764 LA Bossier City City $126,320
765 LA Houma City $76,230
766 LA Kenner City $124,990
767 LA Lafayette City $266,390
768 LA Lake Charles City $142,110
769 LA Monroe City $76,890
770 LA New Orleans City $381,470
771 LA Shreveport City $224,220
772 MA Barnstable County $81,070
773 MA Amherst, Town of City $76,440
774 MA Andover, Town of City $76,430
775 MA Arlington, Town of City $76,470
776 MA Attleboro City $76,560
777 MA Barnstable, Town of City $76,690
778 MA Beverly City $76,510
779 MA Billerica, Town of City $76,490
780 MA Boston City $659,990
781 MA Braintree, Town of City $76,390
782 MA Brockton City $151,670
783 MA Brookline, Town of City $120,650
784 MA Cambridge City $182,140

22 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
785 MA Chelmsford, Town of City $76,320
786 MA Chelsea City $76,360
787 MA Chicopee City $116,600
788 MA Everett City $76,560
789 MA Fall River City $145,730
790 MA Fitchburg City $76,400
791 MA Framingham City $132,170
792 MA Haverhill City $123,100
793 MA Holyoke City $76,420
794 MA Lawrence City $139,690
795 MA Leominster City $76,490
796 MA Lowell City $159,570
797 MA Lynn City $145,930
798 MA Malden City $120,570
799 MA Marlborough City $76,570
800 MA Medford City $117,420
801 MA Methuen, Town of City $112,740
802 MA Natick, Town of City $76,340
803 MA New Bedford City $148,890
804 MA Newton City $145,080
805 MA Peabody City $115,700
806 MA Pittsfield City $76,570
807 MA Plymouth, Town of City $121,930
808 MA Quincy City $149,380
809 MA Revere City $116,740
810 MA Salem City $76,490
811 MA Shrewsbury, Town of City $76,290
812 MA Somerville City $131,920
813 MA Springfield City $197,920
814 MA Taunton City $119,000
815 MA Waltham City $129,590
816 MA Watertown City $76,220
817 MA Westfield City $76,430
818 MA Weymouth, Town of City $117,020
819 MA Woburn City $76,570
820 MA Worcester City $232,230
821 MD Anne Arundel County $488,150
822 MD Baltimore County $712,040

23 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
823 MD Carroll County $80,670
824 MD Charles County $80,380
825 MD Frederick County $81,250
826 MD Harford County $266,890
827 MD Howard County $326,870
828 MD Montgomery County $764,010
829 MD Prince George's County $681,220
830 MD St. Mary's County $78,910
831 MD Annapolis City $76,480
832 MD Baltimore City $549,550
833 MD Bowie City $117,040
834 MD College Park City $76,350
835 MD Frederick City $137,000
836 MD Gaithersburg City $130,110
837 MD Hagerstown City $76,550
838 MD Laurel City $76,020
839 MD Rockville City $134,050
840 MD Salisbury City $76,290
841 ME Androscoggin County $76,570
842 ME Aroostook County $77,330
843 ME Cumberland County $79,760
844 ME Hancock County $76,920
845 ME Kennebec County $79,330
846 ME Knox County $76,420
847 ME Oxford County $76,950
848 ME Penobscot County $79,010
849 ME Somerset County $76,720
850 ME York County $80,520
851 ME Auburn City $75,880
852 ME Bangor City $76,320
853 ME Biddeford City $75,790
854 ME Brunswick, Town of City $75,800
855 ME Lewiston City $76,350
856 ME Portland City $133,250
857 ME Sanford City $75,730
858 ME Scarborough, Town of City $75,810
859 ME South Portland City $75,990
860 ME Westbrook City $75,730

24 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
861 MI Genesee County $283,080
862 MI Jackson County $80,490
863 MI Kent County $326,600
864 MI Livingston County $81,390
865 MI Macomb County $81,190
866 MI Monroe County $80,090
867 MI Oakland County $434,190
868 MI Ottawa County $229,720
869 MI St. Clair County $80,370
870 MI Wayne County $487,490
871 MI Ann Arbor City $182,360
872 MI Battle Creek City $118,280
873 MI Bloomfield, Charter Township of City $76,510
874 MI Canton, Charter Township of City $145,160
875 MI Chesterfield, Township of City $76,500
876 MI Clinton, Charter Township of City $149,860
877 MI Commerce, Charter Township of City $76,430
878 MI Dearborn City $166,370
879 MI Dearborn Heights City $118,960
880 MI Detroit City $582,030
881 MI East Lansing City $76,850
882 MI Farmington Hills City $140,530
883 MI Flint City $144,050
884 MI Georgetown, Charter Township of City $112,810
885 MI Grand Blanc, Charter Township of City $76,340
886 MI Grand Rapids City $235,280
887 MI Holland, Charter Township of City $76,380
888 MI Independence, Charter Township of City $76,200
889 MI Kalamazoo City $135,750
890 MI Kentwood City $118,670
891 MI Lansing City $168,150
892 MI Lincoln Park City $76,260
893 MI Livonia City $155,220
894 MI Macomb, Township of City $138,090
895 MI Meridian, Charter Township of City $76,480
896 MI Midland City $76,620
897 MI Muskegon City $76,450
898 MI Novi City $126,900

25 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
899 MI Orion, Charter Township of City $76,300
900 MI Pittsfield, Charter Township of City $76,400
901 MI Pontiac City $123,740
902 MI Portage City $76,800
903 MI Redford, Charter Township of City $76,600
904 MI Rochester Hills City $131,400
905 MI Roseville City $76,600
906 MI Royal Oak City $119,370
907 MI Saginaw City $76,670
908 MI Saginaw, Charter Township of City $76,420
909 MI Shelby, Charter Township of City $133,950
910 MI Southfield City $142,010
911 MI St. Clair Shores City $117,070
912 MI Sterling Heights City $176,580
913 MI Taylor City $122,780
914 MI Troy City $153,850
915 MI Warren City $187,140
916 MI Waterford, Charter Township of City $126,150
917 MI West Bloomfield, Charter Township of City $122,750 918 MI Westland City $135,220
919 MI Wyoming City $133,940
920 MI Ypsilanti, Charter Township of City $113,970
921 MN Anoka County $240,860
922 MN Carver County $78,560
923 MN Dakota County $79,810
924 MN Hennepin County $282,750
925 MN Ramsey County $80,780
926 MN Scott County $78,460
927 MN St. Louis County $78,900
928 MN Stearns County $78,580
929 MN Washington County $80,160
930 MN Wright County $79,610
931 MN Apple Valley City $114,820
932 MN Blaine City $126,550
933 MN Bloomington City $150,730
934 MN Brooklyn Park City $137,300
935 MN Burnsville City $123,700
936 MN Coon Rapids City $121,480

26 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
937 MN Cottage Grove City $76,230
938 MN Duluth City $144,340
939 MN Eagan City $130,890
940 MN Eden Prairie City $128,580
941 MN Edina City $119,340
942 MN Inver Grove Heights City $76,160
943 MN Lakeville City $123,680
944 MN Mankato City $76,630
945 MN Maple Grove City $128,850
946 MN Maplewood City $76,530
947 MN Minneapolis City $424,330
948 MN Minnetonka City $119,890
949 MN Moorhead City $76,470
950 MN Plymouth City $139,830
951 MN Richfield City $76,260
952 MN Rochester City $172,870
953 MN Roseville City $76,370
954 MN Shakopee City $76,550
955 MN St. Cloud City $131,730
956 MN St. Louis Park City $114,140
957 MN St. Paul City $317,800
958 MN Woodbury City $129,800
959 MO Cass County $78,410
960 MO Christian County $77,850
961 MO Clay County $78,540
962 MO Franklin County $78,530
963 MO Greene County $79,080
964 MO Jackson County $79,620
965 MO Jasper County $77,570
966 MO Jefferson County $235,510
967 MO St. Charles County $79,500
968 MO St. Louis County $735,340
969 MO Blue Springs City $117,010
970 MO Cape Girardeau City $76,480
971 MO Chesterfield City $76,990
972 MO Columbia City $176,550
973 MO Florissant City $112,080
974 MO Independence City $163,880

27 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
975 MO Jefferson City City $76,770
976 MO Joplin City $119,050
977 MO Kansas City City $477,390
978 MO Lee's Summit City $150,390
979 MO O'Fallon City $142,430
980 MO Springfield City $220,930
981 MO St. Charles City $129,280
982 MO St. Joseph City $133,950
983 MO St. Louis City $330,620
984 MO St. Peters City $118,770
985 MO University City City $76,120
986 MO Wentzville City $76,500
987 MO Wildwood City $76,120
988 MS DeSoto County $77,890
989 MS Harrison County $77,830
990 MS Jackson County $79,900
991 MS Jones County $77,380
992 MS Lafayette County $76,940
993 MS Lamar County $76,910
994 MS Lowndes County $77,090
995 MS Madison County $78,810
996 MS Pearl River County $76,860
997 MS Rankin County $80,400
998 MS Biloxi City $76,850
999 MS Clinton City $75,910
1000 MS Greenville City $76,050
1001 MS Gulfport City $133,890
1002 MS Hattiesburg City $76,920
1003 MS Jackson City $201,980
1004 MS Meridian City $76,380
1005 MS Olive Branch City $76,380
1006 MS Southaven City $116,540
1007 MS Tupelo City $76,530
1008 MT Cascade County $75,790
1009 MT Flathead County $77,670
1010 MT Gallatin County $76,860
1011 MT Lake County $76,060
1012 MT Lewis and Clark County $76,220

28 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1013 MT Lincoln County $75,680
1014 MT Missoula County $76,470
1015 MT Park County $75,580
1016 MT Ravalli County $76,490
1017 MT Yellowstone County $76,600
1018 MT Anaconda-Deer Lodge City $75,330
1019 MT Belgrade City $75,330
1020 MT Billings City $165,490
1021 MT Bozeman City $116,320
1022 MT Butte-Silver Bow City $76,200
1023 MT Great Falls City $121,420
1024 MT Havre City $75,330
1025 MT Helena City $76,250
1026 MT Kalispell City $75,940
1027 MT Missoula City $134,040
1028 NC Brunswick County $79,640
1029 NC Buncombe County $80,700
1030 NC Davidson County $80,360
1031 NC Gaston County $79,790
1032 NC Iredell County $79,640
1033 NC Johnston County $229,210
1034 NC Mecklenburg County $81,120
1035 NC Randolph County $79,870
1036 NC Union County $81,610
1037 NC Wake County $329,670
1038 NC Apex, Town of City $117,810
1039 NC Asheville City $158,820
1040 NC Burlington City $120,610
1041 NC Cary, Town of City $210,400
1042 NC Chapel Hill, Town of City $129,010
1043 NC Charlotte City $777,930
1044 NC Concord City $153,940
1045 NC Durham City $297,140
1046 NC Fayetteville City $245,040
1047 NC Gastonia City $137,620
1048 NC Greensboro City $314,150
1049 NC Greenville City $146,850
1050 NC Hickory City $76,750

29 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1051 NC High Point City $165,110
1052 NC Holly Springs, Town of City $76,320
1053 NC Huntersville, Town of City $120,070
1054 NC Indian Trail, Town of City $76,350
1055 NC Jacksonville City $139,090
1056 NC Kannapolis City $113,050
1057 NC Mooresville, Town of City $113,610
1058 NC Raleigh City $450,390
1059 NC Rocky Mount City $118,650
1060 NC Salisbury City $76,370
1061 NC Wake Forest, Town of City $76,560
1062 NC Wilmington City $172,690
1063 NC Wilson City $76,800
1064 NC Winston-Salem City $274,010
1065 ND Barnes County $75,370
1066 ND Burleigh County $75,770
1067 ND Cass County $75,660
1068 ND Grand Forks County $75,480
1069 ND McKenzie County $75,530
1070 ND Ramsey County $75,400
1071 ND Rolette County $75,450
1072 ND Walsh County $75,370
1073 ND Ward County $75,750
1074 ND Williams County $75,420
1075 ND Bismarck City $133,550
1076 ND Dickinson City $75,870
1077 ND Fargo City $176,940
1078 ND Grand Forks City $120,420
1079 ND Jamestown City $75,550
1080 ND Mandan City $75,790
1081 ND Minot City $76,670
1082 ND Wahpeton City $75,290
1083 ND West Fargo City $76,250
1084 ND Williston City $76,010
1085 NE Cass County $75,850
1086 NE Dakota County $75,750
1087 NE Dawson County $75,830
1088 NE Douglas County $78,070

30 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1089 NE Gage County $75,740
1090 NE Lancaster County $76,020
1091 NE Lincoln County $76,220
1092 NE Sarpy County $78,430
1093 NE Saunders County $75,720
1094 NE Scotts Bluff County $76,260
1095 NE Bellevue City $120,630
1096 NE Columbus City $75,850
1097 NE Fremont City $75,940
1098 NE Grand Island City $116,440
1099 NE Hastings City $75,880
1100 NE Kearney City $76,190
1101 NE Lincoln City $300,090
1102 NE Norfolk City $75,890
1103 NE Omaha City $461,600
1104 NE Papillion City $75,830
1105 NH Belknap County $77,160
1106 NH Carroll County $76,710
1107 NH Cheshire County $77,630
1108 NH Coos County $76,080
1109 NH Grafton County $78,280
1110 NH Hillsborough County $80,440
1111 NH Merrimack County $78,630
1112 NH Rockingham County $244,460
1113 NH Strafford County $77,200
1114 NH Sullivan County $76,450
1115 NH Concord City $76,720
1116 NH Derry, Town of City $76,090
1117 NH Dover City $76,150
1118 NH Hudson, Town of City $75,840
1119 NH Londonderry, Town of City $75,920
1120 NH Manchester City $163,660
1121 NH Merrimack, Town of City $75,970
1122 NH Nashua City $144,610
1123 NH Rochester City $76,080
1124 NH Salem, Town of City $76,090
1125 NJ Bergen County $695,630
1126 NJ Burlington County $349,100

31 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1127 NJ Camden County $244,430
1128 NJ Essex County $257,630
1129 NJ Gloucester County $234,830
1130 NJ Monmouth County $380,600
1131 NJ Morris County $422,170
1132 NJ Ocean County $81,110
1133 NJ Somerset County $81,640
1134 NJ Union County $285,940
1135 NJ Atlantic City City $76,540
1136 NJ Bayonne City $124,910
1137 NJ Belleville, Township of City $76,210
1138 NJ Berkeley, Township of City $76,410
1139 NJ Bloomfield, Township of City $112,160
1140 NJ Brick, Township of City $128,690
1141 NJ Bridgewater, Township of City $76,720
1142 NJ Camden City $131,910
1143 NJ Cherry Hill, Township of City $134,260
1144 NJ Clifton City $140,650
1145 NJ East Brunswick, Township of City $76,710
1146 NJ East Orange City $123,800
1147 NJ Edison, Township of City $159,920
1148 NJ Egg Harbor, Township of City $76,600
1149 NJ Elizabeth City $177,390
1150 NJ Evesham, Township of City $76,580
1151 NJ Ewing, Township of City $76,350
1152 NJ Fort Lee, Borough of City $76,320
1153 NJ Franklin, Township of City $126,920
1154 NJ Freehold, Township of City $76,270
1155 NJ Galloway, Township of City $76,250
1156 NJ Gloucester, Township of City $121,580
1157 NJ Hackensack City $76,730
1158 NJ Hamilton, Township of City $142,770
1159 NJ Hillsborough, Township of City $76,380
1160 NJ Hoboken City $118,080
1161 NJ Howell, Township of City $113,320
1162 NJ Irvington, Township of City $116,760
1163 NJ Jackson, Township of City $115,540
1164 NJ Jersey City City $291,330

32 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1165 NJ Kearny, Town of City $76,420
1166 NJ Lakewood, Township of City $173,640
1167 NJ Linden City $76,500
1168 NJ Manalapan, Township of City $76,330
1169 NJ Manchester, Township of City $76,500
1170 NJ Marlboro, Township of City $76,350
1171 NJ Middletown, Township of City $123,080
1172 NJ Monroe, Township of (Gloucester County) City $76,180 1173 NJ Monroe, Township of (Middlesex County) City $76,590 1174 NJ Montclair, Township of City $76,400
1175 NJ Mount Laurel, Township of City $76,680
1176 NJ New Brunswick, Township of City $121,880
1177 NJ Newark City $317,540
1178 NJ North Bergen, Township of City $120,810
1179 NJ North Brunswick, Township of City $76,450
1180 NJ Old Bridge, Township of City $121,610
1181 NJ Parsippany-Troy Hills, Township of City $122,450 1182 NJ Passaic City $126,930
1183 NJ Paterson City $190,900
1184 NJ Pennsauken, Township of City $76,290
1185 NJ Perth Amboy City $114,270
1186 NJ Piscataway, Township of City $122,360
1187 NJ Plainfield City $112,690
1188 NJ Sayreville, Borough of City $76,430
1189 NJ South Brunswick, Township of City $76,670
1190 NJ Teaneck, Township of City $76,380
1191 NJ Toms River, Township of City $147,200
1192 NJ Trenton City $145,700
1193 NJ Union City City $123,130
1194 NJ Union, Township of City $120,360
1195 NJ Vineland City $122,730
1196 NJ Washington, Township of City $76,620
1197 NJ Wayne, Township of City $118,460
1198 NJ West New York, Town of City $111,500
1199 NJ West Orange, Township of City $76,600
1200 NJ Winslow, Township of City $76,270
1201 NJ Woodbridge, Township of City $153,300
1202 NM Bernalillo County $78,950

33 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1203 NM Dona Ana County $78,650
1204 NM McKinley County $77,520
1205 NM Otero County $76,280
1206 NM Rio Arriba County $76,350
1207 NM San Juan County $77,580
1208 NM Sandoval County $76,540
1209 NM Santa Fe County $77,200
1210 NM Taos County $76,180
1211 NM Valencia County $77,550
1212 NM Alamogordo City $76,060
1213 NM Albuquerque City $512,750
1214 NM Carlsbad City $76,110
1215 NM Clovis City $76,310
1216 NM Farmington City $76,680
1217 NM Hobbs City $76,410
1218 NM Las Cruces City $160,190
1219 NM Rio Rancho City $149,420
1220 NM Roswell City $76,680
1221 NM Santa Fe City $144,530
1222 NV Churchill County $75,870
1223 NV Clark County $844,640
1224 NV Douglas County $76,700
1225 NV Elko County $76,100
1226 NV Humboldt County $75,600
1227 NV Lyon County $76,190
1228 NV Nye County $76,720
1229 NV Pershing County $75,230
1230 NV Washoe County $78,680
1231 NV White Pine County $75,330
1232 NV Boulder City $75,520
1233 NV Carson City City $120,450
1234 NV Elko City $75,750
1235 NV Fernley City $75,730
1236 NV Henderson City $307,600
1237 NV Las Vegas City $583,470
1238 NV Mesquite City $75,720
1239 NV North Las Vegas City $262,780
1240 NV Reno City $280,500

34 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1241 NV Sparks City $155,620
1242 NY Dutchess County $259,770
1243 NY Erie County $248,410
1244 NY Monroe County $81,200
1245 NY Niagara County $80,400
1246 NY Oneida County $80,830
1247 NY Onondaga County $278,080
1248 NY Orange County $372,460
1249 NY Saratoga County $81,630
1250 NY Ulster County $81,150
1251 NY Westchester County $282,250
1252 NY Albany City $164,050
1253 NY Amherst, Town of City $179,240
1254 NY Babylon, Town of City $235,330
1255 NY Bethlehem, Town of City $76,160
1256 NY Binghamton City $76,690
1257 NY Brighton, Town of City $76,350
1258 NY Brookhaven, Town of City $429,790
1259 NY Buffalo City $293,740
1260 NY Cheektowaga, Town of City $143,440
1261 NY Clarkstown, Town of City $140,500
1262 NY Clay, Town of City $118,800
1263 NY Clifton Park, Town of City $76,290
1264 NY Colonie, Town of City $146,350
1265 NY Cortlandt, Town of City $76,420
1266 NY Greece, Town of City $144,840
1267 NY Greenburgh, Town of City $149,090
1268 NY Guilderland, Town of City $76,220
1269 NY Hamburg, Town of City $118,990
1270 NY Haverstraw, Town of City $76,230
1271 NY Hempstead, Town of City $649,790
1272 NY Henrietta, Town of City $76,850
1273 NY Huntington, Town of City $233,490
1274 NY Irondequoit, Town of City $111,250
1275 NY Islip, Town of City $328,290
1276 NY Lancaster, Town of City $76,520
1277 NY Long Beach City $76,100
1278 NY Mount Pleasant, Town of City $76,680

35 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1279 NY Mount Vernon City $126,920
1280 NY New Rochelle City $133,340
1281 NY New York City $6,875,730
1282 NY Niagara Falls City $76,720
1283 NY North Hempstead, Town of City $263,550
1284 NY Orangetown, Town of City $76,720
1285 NY Ossining, Town of City $76,300
1286 NY Oyster Bay, Town of City $304,060
1287 NY Penfield, Town of City $76,310
1288 NY Perinton, Town of City $76,620
1289 NY Poughkeepsie, Town of City $76,620
1290 NY Ramapo, Town of City $184,790
1291 NY Riverhead, Town of City $76,280
1292 NY Rochester City $248,150
1293 NY Rye, Town of City $76,660
1294 NY Schenectady City $126,660
1295 NY Smithtown, Town of City $163,460
1296 NY Southampton, Town of City $126,880
1297 NY Syracuse City $195,980
1298 NY Tonawanda, Town of City $128,620
1299 NY Troy City $114,100
1300 NY Union, Town of City $117,440
1301 NY Utica City $125,390
1302 NY Webster, Town of City $76,520
1303 NY West Seneca, Town of City $76,510
1304 NY White Plains City $126,510
1305 NY Yonkers City $227,490
1306 NY Yorktown, Town of City $76,250
1307 OH Butler County $248,500
1308 OH Clermont County $225,940
1309 OH Cuyahoga County $557,250
1310 OH Franklin County $81,940
1311 OH Hamilton County $473,280
1312 OH Lake County $81,130
1313 OH Montgomery County $305,670
1314 OH Stark County $302,340
1315 OH Summit County $304,340
1316 OH Warren County $253,250

36 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1317 OH Akron City $225,370
1318 OH Beavercreek City $76,640
1319 OH Brunswick City $76,140
1320 OH Canton City $131,670
1321 OH Cincinnati City $334,440
1322 OH Cleveland City $386,700
1323 OH Cleveland Heights City $76,450
1324 OH Columbus City $778,900
1325 OH Cuyahoga Falls City $112,560
1326 OH Dayton City $187,930
1327 OH Delaware City $76,410
1328 OH Dublin City $76,910
1329 OH Elyria City $115,220
1330 OH Euclid City $76,640
1331 OH Fairfield City $76,610
1332 OH Findlay City $76,520
1333 OH Gahanna City $76,250
1334 OH Grove City City $76,460
1335 OH Hamilton City $122,250
1336 OH Hilliard City $76,280
1337 OH Huber Heights City $76,400
1338 OH Kettering City $119,280
1339 OH Lakewood City $110,300
1340 OH Lancaster City $76,420
1341 OH Lima City $76,310
1342 OH Lorain City $122,270
1343 OH Mansfield City $76,760
1344 OH Marion City $76,250
1345 OH Mentor City $76,760
1346 OH Middletown City $113,080
1347 OH Newark City $76,750
1348 OH North Ridgeville City $76,130
1349 OH Parma City $132,830
1350 OH Reynoldsburg City $76,300
1351 OH Springfield City $121,530
1352 OH Strongsville City $76,610
1353 OH Toledo City $285,750
1354 OH Upper Arlington City $76,220

37 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1355 OH Warren City $76,400
1356 OH Westerville City $76,500
1357 OH Youngstown City $124,150
1358 OK Canadian County $77,220
1359 OK Creek County $77,390
1360 OK Grady County $76,830
1361 OK Le Flore County $76,660
1362 OK Logan County $76,590
1363 OK Oklahoma County $79,740
1364 OK Pottawatomie County $77,470
1365 OK Rogers County $78,010
1366 OK Tulsa County $79,610
1367 OK Wagoner County $76,900
1368 OK Bartlesville City $76,320
1369 OK Broken Arrow City $156,940
1370 OK Edmond City $146,020
1371 OK Enid City $114,420
1372 OK Lawton City $146,710
1373 OK Midwest City City $117,820
1374 OK Moore City $119,560
1375 OK Muskogee City $76,370
1376 OK Norman City $171,050
1377 OK Oklahoma City City $612,250
1378 OK Owasso City $76,270
1379 OK Stillwater City $76,760
1380 OK Tulsa City $408,420
1381 OR Clackamas County $329,650
1382 OR Deschutes County $78,310
1383 OR Douglas County $78,850
1384 OR Jackson County $79,600
1385 OR Lane County $79,830
1386 OR Linn County $77,780
1387 OR Marion County $80,470
1388 OR Umatilla County $77,740
1389 OR Washington County $324,390
1390 OR Yamhill County $78,660
1391 OR Albany City $117,460
1392 OR Beaverton City $152,000

38 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1393 OR Bend City $152,740
1394 OR Corvallis City $122,590
1395 OR Eugene City $212,520
1396 OR Grants Pass City $76,430
1397 OR Gresham City $158,600
1398 OR Hillsboro City $163,840
1399 OR Keizer City $76,270
1400 OR Lake Oswego City $76,440
1401 OR Medford City $143,430
1402 OR Oregon City City $76,260
1403 OR Portland City $602,650
1404 OR Salem City $214,750
1405 OR Springfield City $123,250
1406 OR Tigard City $118,610
1407 PA Allegheny County $751,200
1408 PA Berks County $324,850
1409 PA Bucks County $404,580
1410 PA Chester County $479,860
1411 PA Cumberland County $274,270
1412 PA Delaware County $406,930
1413 PA Lancaster County $411,780
1414 PA Lehigh County $252,780
1415 PA Luzerne County $287,780
1416 PA Montgomery County $594,260
1417 PA Northampton County $264,030
1418 PA Washington County $233,750
1419 PA Westmoreland County $308,180
1420 PA York County $377,890
1421 PA Abington, Township of (Montgomery County) City $118,250 1422 PA Allentown City $170,070
1423 PA Altoona City $76,540
1424 PA Bensalem, Township of City $122,290
1425 PA Bethlehem City $135,180
1426 PA Bristol, Township of City $114,490
1427 PA Cheltenham, Township of City $76,230
1428 PA Erie City $151,020
1429 PA Harrisburg City $120,600
1430 PA Haverford, Township of City $110,660

39 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1431 PA
Hempfield, Township of (Westmoreland
County) City $76,460
1432 PA Lancaster City $122,800
1433 PA Lower Merion, Township of City $126,250
1434 PA Lower Paxton, Township of City $114,320
1435 PA Manheim, Township of (Lancaster County) City $76,560 1436 PA Middletown, Township of (Bucks County) City $76,530 1437 PA Millcreek, Township of (Erie County) City $115,710 1438 PA Norristown, Borough of City $76,190
1439 PA Northampton, Township of City $76,280
1440 PA Penn Hills, Township of City $76,340
1441 PA Philadelphia City $1,316,810
1442 PA Pittsburgh City $337,960
1443 PA Reading City $145,490
1444 PA Scranton City $134,690
1445 PA State College, Borough of City $76,560
1446 PA Upper Darby, Township of City $134,340
1447 PA Wilkes-Barre City $76,590
1448 PA York City $76,680
1449 PR Aguada City $76,280
1450 PR Aguadilla City $118,070
1451 PR Arecibo City $142,090
1452 PR Bayamon City $213,340
1453 PR Cabo Rojo City $76,600
1454 PR Caguas City $173,030
1455 PR Canovanas City $76,440
1456 PR Carolina City $191,230
1457 PR Cayey City $76,470
1458 PR Cidra City $76,340
1459 PR Dorado City $76,240
1460 PR Guayama City $76,340
1461 PR Guaynabo City $147,260
1462 PR Gurabo City $76,400
1463 PR Hatillo City $76,330
1464 PR Humacao City $115,070
1465 PR Isabela City $76,450
1466 PR Juana Diaz City $76,560
1467 PR Juncos City $76,290
1468 PR Las Piedras City $76,220

40 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1469 PR Manati City $76,420
1470 PR Mayaguez City $134,110
1471 PR Moca City $76,260
1472 PR Ponce City $183,120
1473 PR Rio Grande City $76,580
1474 PR San Juan City $357,770
1475 PR San Lorenzo City $76,250
1476 PR San Sebastian City $76,320
1477 PR Toa Alta City $122,670
1478 PR Toa Baja City $130,000
1479 PR Trujillo Alto City $122,800
1480 PR Vega Alta City $76,200
1481 PR Vega Baja City $115,150
1482 RI Coventry, Town of City $76,130
1483 RI Cranston City $136,300
1484 RI Cumberland, Town of City $76,180
1485 RI East Providence City $76,630
1486 RI North Providence, Town of City $76,090
1487 RI Pawtucket City $128,950
1488 RI Providence City $227,730
1489 RI South Kingstown, Town of City $76,120
1490 RI Warwick City $139,610
1491 RI Woonsocket City $76,470
1492 SC Aiken County $80,820
1493 SC Anderson County $227,180
1494 SC Beaufort County $80,150
1495 SC Berkeley County $80,300
1496 SC Greenville County $393,510
1497 SC Horry County $307,990
1498 SC Lexington County $297,180
1499 SC Richland County $278,170
1500 SC Spartanburg County $282,710
1501 SC York County $226,460
1502 SC Charleston City $195,380
1503 SC Columbia City $198,460
1504 SC Florence City $76,570
1505 SC Goose Creek City $76,520
1506 SC Greenville City $144,320

41 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1507 SC Greer City $76,210
1508 SC Hilton Head Island, Town of City $76,420
1509 SC Mount Pleasant, Town of City $142,750
1510 SC Myrtle Beach City $76,580
1511 SC North Charleston City $171,700
1512 SC Rock Hill City $133,080
1513 SC Spartanburg City $76,580
1514 SC Summerville, Town of City $113,980
1515 SC Sumter City $76,610
1516 SD Brookings County $75,360
1517 SD Clay County $75,500
1518 SD Lake County $75,390
1519 SD Lawrence County $75,460
1520 SD Lincoln County $75,840
1521 SD Meade County $75,960
1522 SD Minnehaha County $76,450
1523 SD Oglala Lakota County $75,490
1524 SD Pennington County $76,130
1525 SD Union County $75,590
1526 SD Aberdeen City $76,020
1527 SD Brookings City $75,860
1528 SD Huron City $75,490
1529 SD Mitchell City $75,560
1530 SD Pierre City $75,510
1531 SD Rapid City City $135,960
1532 SD Sioux Falls City $224,030
1533 SD Spearfish City $75,440
1534 SD Watertown City $75,810
1535 SD Yankton City $75,570
1536 TN Blount County $79,600
1537 TN Hamilton County $80,940
1538 TN Knox County $279,650
1539 TN Putnam County $77,840
1540 TN Rutherford County $77,990
1541 TN Sevier County $78,460
1542 TN Shelby County $79,610
1543 TN Sullivan County $78,530
1544 TN Sumner County $77,880

42 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1545 TN Williamson County $77,700
1546 TN Bartlett City $117,930
1547 TN Brentwood City $76,730
1548 TN Chattanooga City $234,200
1549 TN Clarksville City $197,220
1550 TN Cleveland City $76,790
1551 TN Collierville, Town of City $113,610
1552 TN Columbia City $76,480
1553 TN Franklin City $145,990
1554 TN Gallatin City $76,540
1555 TN Germantown City $76,430
1556 TN Hendersonville City $120,260
1557 TN Jackson City $132,680
1558 TN Johnson City City $134,060
1559 TN Kingsport City $121,880
1560 TN Knoxville City $239,720
1561 TN La Vergne City $76,330
1562 TN Lebanon City $76,430
1563 TN Memphis City $590,500
1564 TN Mount Juliet City $76,310
1565 TN Murfreesboro City $190,230
1566 TN
Nashville-Davidson, Metropolitan Government
of City $644,440
1567 TN Smyrna, Town of City $117,300
1568 TN Spring Hill City $109,170
1569 TX Bexar County $464,940
1570 TX Brazoria County $268,260
1571 TX Collin County $219,010
1572 TX Denton County $251,160
1573 TX Fort Bend County $456,500
1574 TX Harris County $1,636,340
1575 TX Hidalgo County $357,000
1576 TX Montgomery County $457,580
1577 TX Tarrant County $306,040
1578 TX Travis County $293,610
1579 TX Williamson County $235,100
1580 TX Abilene City $172,590
1581 TX Allen City $151,800
1582 TX Amarillo City $227,860

43 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1583 TX Arlington City $369,400
1584 TX Austin City $855,340
1585 TX Baytown City $140,370
1586 TX Beaumont City $168,420
1587 TX Bedford City $76,680
1588 TX Brownsville City $217,400
1589 TX Bryan City $140,860
1590 TX Burleson City $76,610
1591 TX Carrollton City $177,310
1592 TX Cedar Hill City $76,610
1593 TX Cedar Park City $132,620
1594 TX College Station City $167,660
1595 TX Conroe City $145,460
1596 TX Coppell City $76,610
1597 TX Copperas Cove City $76,170
1598 TX Corpus Christi City $322,260
1599 TX Dallas City $1,132,070
1600 TX Denton City $182,710
1601 TX DeSoto City $114,690
1602 TX Duncanville City $76,340
1603 TX Edinburg City $153,020
1604 TX El Paso City $595,490
1605 TX Euless City $117,300
1606 TX Farmers Branch City $76,570
1607 TX Flower Mound, Town of City $132,150
1608 TX Fort Worth City $785,490
1609 TX Friendswood City $76,330
1610 TX Frisco City $224,480
1611 TX Galveston City $118,860
1612 TX Garland City $251,490
1613 TX Georgetown City $128,440
1614 TX Grand Prairie City $220,600
1615 TX Grapevine City $122,650
1616 TX Haltom City City $76,540
1617 TX Harlingen City $132,290
1618 TX Houston City $2,006,020
1619 TX Huntsville City $76,640
1620 TX Hurst City $76,390

44 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1621 TX Irving City $284,550
1622 TX Keller City $76,540
1623 TX Killeen City $184,930
1624 TX Kyle City $76,480
1625 TX La Porte City $76,250
1626 TX Lancaster City $76,350
1627 TX Laredo City $271,290
1628 TX League City City $155,210
1629 TX Leander City $116,720
1630 TX Lewisville City $158,370
1631 TX Little Elm City $76,480
1632 TX Longview City $141,720
1633 TX Lubbock City $274,430
1634 TX Mansfield City $129,070
1635 TX McAllen City $190,200
1636 TX McKinney City $219,230
1637 TX Mesquite City $182,880
1638 TX Midland City $180,140
1639 TX Midlothian City $76,150
1640 TX Mission City $140,450
1641 TX Missouri City City $128,070
1642 TX New Braunfels City $143,530
1643 TX North Richland Hills City $125,800
1644 TX Odessa City $165,070
1645 TX Pasadena City $191,680
1646 TX Pearland City $164,610
1647 TX Pflugerville City $120,850
1648 TX Pharr City $135,910
1649 TX Plano City $307,870
1650 TX Port Arthur City $118,760
1651 TX Richardson City $177,400
1652 TX Rockwall City $76,650
1653 TX Rosenberg City $76,330
1654 TX Round Rock City $169,320
1655 TX Rowlett City $119,050
1656 TX San Angelo City $151,890
1657 TX San Antonio City $1,220,460
1658 TX San Juan City $76,170

45 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1659 TX San Marcos City $127,080
1660 TX Schertz City $76,400
1661 TX Sherman City $76,610
1662 TX Sugar Land City $164,210
1663 TX Temple City $140,420
1664 TX Texarkana City $76,440
1665 TX Texas City City $114,390
1666 TX The Colony City $76,380
1667 TX Tyler City $162,770
1668 TX Victoria City $126,590
1669 TX Waco City $187,120
1670 TX Waxahachie City $76,430
1671 TX Weslaco City $76,470
1672 TX Wichita Falls City $155,820
1673 TX Wylie City $114,380
1674 UT Box Elder County $76,950
1675 UT Cache County $77,620
1676 UT Davis County $248,800
1677 UT Salt Lake County $80,390
1678 UT Summit County $76,520
1679 UT Tooele County $76,190
1680 UT Uintah County $76,240
1681 UT Utah County $80,710
1682 UT Washington County $77,810
1683 UT Weber County $79,480
1684 UT Bountiful City $76,530
1685 UT Cedar City City $76,240
1686 UT Draper City $117,010
1687 UT Eagle Mountain City $76,330
1688 UT Herriman City $111,860
1689 UT Kearns, Metro Township of City $76,130
1690 UT Layton City $134,230
1691 UT Lehi City $132,310
1692 UT Logan City $117,590
1693 UT Midvale City $76,210
1694 UT Millcreek City $121,210
1695 UT Murray City $116,350
1696 UT Ogden City $145,720

46 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1697 UT Orem City $150,350
1698 UT Pleasant Grove City $76,260
1699 UT Provo City $165,350
1700 UT Riverton City $76,480
1701 UT Roy City $76,240
1702 UT Salt Lake City City $264,650
1703 UT Sandy City $148,400
1704 UT Saratoga Springs City $76,170
1705 UT South Jordan City $132,100
1706 UT Spanish Fork City $76,440
1707 UT Springville City $76,190
1708 UT St. George City $149,500
1709 UT Taylorsville City $118,550
1710 UT Tooele City $76,180
1711 UT West Jordan City $158,100
1712 UT West Valley City City $179,460
1713 VA Albemarle County $78,940
1714 VA Arlington County $267,820
1715 VA Chesterfield County $341,610
1716 VA Fairfax County $963,530
1717 VA Hanover County $78,700
1718 VA Henrico County $333,630
1719 VA Loudoun County $350,900
1720 VA Prince William County $421,130
1721 VA Spotsylvania County $79,560
1722 VA Stafford County $80,130
1723 VA Alexandria City $197,700
1724 VA Blacksburg, Town of City $76,680
1725 VA Charlottesville City $76,840
1726 VA Chesapeake City $260,480
1727 VA Danville City $76,580
1728 VA Hampton City $179,420
1729 VA Harrisonburg City $117,870
1730 VA Leesburg, Town of City $76,710
1731 VA Lynchburg City $140,890
1732 VA Manassas City $76,480
1733 VA Newport News City $221,810
1734 VA Norfolk City $271,840

47 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1735 VA Portsmouth City $151,150
1736 VA Richmond City $262,500
1737 VA Roanoke City $156,480
1738 VA Suffolk City $144,950
1739 VA Virginia Beach City $418,550
1740 VT Addison County $76,270
1741 VT Caledonia County $76,030
1742 VT Chittenden County $76,390
1743 VT Franklin County $76,680
1744 VT Orange County $75,960
1745 VT Orleans County $75,940
1746 VT Rutland County $76,480
1747 VT Washington County $77,100
1748 VT Windham County $76,120
1749 VT Windsor County $76,590
1750 VT Bennington, Town of City $75,560
1751 VT Brattleboro, Town of City $75,460
1752 VT Burlington City $76,670
1753 VT Colchester, Town of City $75,610
1754 VT Essex, Town of City $75,770
1755 VT Hartford, Town of City $75,380
1756 VT Milton, Town of City $75,340
1757 VT Rutland City $75,600
1758 VT South Burlington City $75,760
1759 VT Williston, Town of City $75,410
1760 WA Clark County $296,170
1761 WA Grant County $78,440
1762 WA King County $474,460
1763 WA Kitsap County $245,220
1764 WA Pierce County $497,770
1765 WA Snohomish County $436,900
1766 WA Spokane County $224,600
1767 WA Thurston County $81,040
1768 WA Whatcom County $79,500
1769 WA Yakima County $80,470
1770 WA Auburn City $141,710
1771 WA Bellevue City $203,560
1772 WA Bellingham City $148,080

48 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1773 WA Bothell City $76,740
1774 WA Bremerton City $76,690
1775 WA Burien City $112,300
1776 WA Edmonds City $76,430
1777 WA Everett City $169,950
1778 WA Federal Way City $147,860
1779 WA Issaquah City $76,450
1780 WA Kennewick City $138,680
1781 WA Kent City $179,480
1782 WA Kirkland City $144,580
1783 WA Lacey City $115,460
1784 WA Lake Stevens City $76,130
1785 WA Lakewood City $123,080
1786 WA Longview City $76,370
1787 WA Lynnwood City $76,450
1788 WA Marysville City $124,740
1789 WA Mount Vernon City $76,250
1790 WA Olympia City $122,030
1791 WA Pasco City $131,590
1792 WA Puyallup City $76,570
1793 WA Redmond City $143,150
1794 WA Renton City $157,700
1795 WA Richland City $123,260
1796 WA Sammamish City $121,420
1797 WA Seattle City $681,520
1798 WA Shoreline City $117,070
1799 WA Spokane City $255,210
1800 WA Spokane Valley City $154,350
1801 WA Tacoma City $246,170
1802 WA Vancouver City $223,720
1803 WA Wenatchee City $76,300
1804 WA Yakima City $149,970
1805 WI Brown County $80,630
1806 WI Dane County $266,890
1807 WI Marathon County $78,300
1808 WI Milwaukee County $79,820
1809 WI Outagamie County $79,420
1810 WI Racine County $79,040

49 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1811 WI Walworth County $78,630
1812 WI Washington County $79,610
1813 WI Waukesha County $238,860
1814 WI Winnebago County $78,580
1815 WI Appleton City $134,180
1816 WI Beloit City $76,280
1817 WI Brookfield City $76,600
1818 WI Eau Claire City $130,210
1819 WI Fond du Lac City $76,620
1820 WI Franklin City $76,280
1821 WI Green Bay City $159,610
1822 WI Greenfield City $76,240
1823 WI Janesville City $125,580
1824 WI Kenosha City $149,790
1825 WI La Crosse City $119,590
1826 WI Madison City $291,340
1827 WI Menomonee Falls, Village of City $76,470
1828 WI Milwaukee City $522,370
1829 WI New Berlin City $76,430
1830 WI Oak Creek City $76,280
1831 WI Oshkosh City $128,580
1832 WI Racine City $133,580
1833 WI Sheboygan City $76,730
1834 WI Sun Prairie City $76,190
1835 WI Waukesha City $130,460
1836 WI Wausau City $76,500
1837 WI Wauwatosa City $76,940
1838 WI West Allis City $120,530
1839 WV Berkeley County $78,320
1840 WV Cabell County $76,770
1841 WV Harrison County $76,780
1842 WV Jefferson County $76,900
1843 WV Kanawha County $79,470
1844 WV Mercer County $77,060
1845 WV Monongalia County $77,550
1846 WV Putnam County $76,950
1847 WV Raleigh County $76,950
1848 WV Wood County $76,820

50 # State/Territory Entity Name Level of
Government Allocation
1849 WV Beckley City $75,680
1850 WV Charleston City $77,040
1851 WV Clarksburg City $75,630
1852 WV Fairmont City $75,670
1853 WV Huntington City $76,800
1854 WV Martinsburg City $75,690
1855 WV Morgantown City $76,250
1856 WV Parkersburg City $76,150
1857 WV Weirton City $75,670
1858 WV Wheeling City $76,050
1859 WY Campbell County $75,520
1860 WY Carbon County $75,510
1861 WY Converse County $75,480
1862 WY Fremont County $75,980
1863 WY Goshen County $75,440
1864 WY Laramie County $76,200
1865 WY Lincoln County $75,670
1866 WY Natrona County $75,740
1867 WY Park County $76,030
1868 WY Teton County $75,450
1869 WY Casper City $119,850
1870 WY Cheyenne City $125,720
1871 WY Evanston City $75,410
1872 WY Gillette City $76,140
1873 WY Green River City $75,380
1874 WY Jackson, Town of City $75,410
1875 WY Laramie City $76,110
1876 WY Riverton City $75,380
1877 WY Rock Springs City $75,820
1878 WY Sheridan City $75,670

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Community Services Department
2024-201

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE REVISED COMMUNITY

EVENTS CO-SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM POLICY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the City Council to approve and authorize the execution of the revised Community Events Co-Sponsorship Policy. Approval of this action allows for the Policy to be amended to better reflect current practice, revised language, and clarification regarding the use and eligibility of funding for City co-sponsored community events.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council approve and authorize the execution of the revised Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Policy.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Initially adopted in January 2015, the Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Policy is intended to facilitate the implementation of community events hosted by Corona-based non-profits by way of a fee waiver or in-kind assistance for City staff and/or resources.

Requests for these funds are intended to be one-time only, and organizations that will be considered must meet eligibility criteria.

On Thursday, September 26, 2024, at a Special Meeting of the City Council, staff presented suggested policy revisions for City Council consideration and feedback. Based

on that feedback, staff revised the City’s existing policy to better reflect current use trends and best practices and add additional clarification where needed.

ANALYSIS:

The revised policy correctly identifies Community Services as the assigned department responsible for oversight of the program and the City Council as the approving body.

Additional language was added to clarify that events must be open to the public and not intended for private use and internal functions. Language was also added throughout the document, which states that all eligibility requirements must be met at the time of application. New and emerging groups may still qualify for funding if they are endorsed by an established non-profit that meets eligibility criteria. All applicants must be in good standing with their non-profit status and free of debts. Furthermore, returning organizations must be in good standing regarding the successful delivery of their proposed event, communication during the planning process, and delivering a valuable experience to the community.

Approval of the revised policy goes into effect with the next Community Events CoSponsorship Programming cycle, which will cover July through December 2025.

Applications for this funding cycle open in February 2025 and close in March 2025. During Fiscal Year 2025, the City provided Co-Sponsorship support for 24 events, totaling $34,681 in in-kind support through waived costs and fees for City services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact associated with the recommended policy changes.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action strictly pertains to the Co-Sponsorship Program and standard City operations and there is no possibility that approving this project will have a significant effect on the environment.

Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: JASON LASS, RECREATION SERVICES MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: DONNA FINCH, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Community Events Co-Sponsorship Policy (Redline)

2. Exhibit 2 – Community Events Co-Sponsorship Policy (Clean)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Administrative Policy
The Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program is administered by Management Services using funds from the Buildings, Facilities and Systems category of the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget (General Fund Project No. 6380), and is intendedARTICLE I - PURPOSE Section 1.1 General Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to facilitate community events open to the general public and provide police security for dignitary protection services. Funding from thisThe Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program can be usedprovides for City co-sponsorship of community Policy: Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy Title: COMMUNITIY EVENTS CO-SPONSORSHIP

PROGRAM FUNDING POLICY
Administered By: ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee Department (Recreation)
Section
No. Policy
No.

Issue
Date
Revisio
n
Date
Dept. Head
Approved
City
Manager
Approved
Mayor
Approved
10006400.009 .3012-
04-24
01-21-
15N/A

Administrative Policy 100.30 (Rev. 01-21-15) 06400.009 (12-04-24) Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14
events. The funds are used to offset City fees and the cost through in-kind contributions of City fees, City services incurredand staff time. The Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program does not provide funding for third-party vendors, outside services, or any other costs or services that are not normally provided by the City for community events.

The Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program receives a “"one-time”" allocation each fiscal year into the community co-sponsored events project (No. 6380), depending on available funds.

Section 1.2 Superseded Policies
This policy supersedes and replaces the following policies, which are hereby eliminated in their entirety and are of no further force and effect:

Policy 07400.003 Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy

ARTICLE II - DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
Section 2.1 Definitions
None.

Section 2.2 General Scope
Unless otherwise stipulated herein, this policy applies to all City employees. All such employees shall comply with the provisions outlined in this policy. It is the responsibility of all supervision to ensure that the provisions outlined in this policy are enforced for those City employees under their authority.

Section 2.3 Exemptions from Scope
None.

ARTICLE III – COMMUNITY EVENTS CO-SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM
Section 3.1 Eligibility Criteria
To qualify for City co-sponsorship consideration and use of funds from the community cosponsored event projectunder the Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program, a community organization and the event must meet all of the following criteria:

A The Community event must be open to the public and inclusive of all residents.

B. Community groups, non-profit 501(c)(3) tax exempt organizations or other government agencies. are eligible for City co-sponsorship. Non-profit status will be verified via the

Administrative Policy 100.30 (Rev. 01-21-15) 06400.009 (12-04-24) Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Requesting agencies must have evidence of current nonprofit status, financial good standing, regulatory compliance and no outstanding debt owed to the City, State, or Federal government at time of application. New and emerging groups who have not yet been incorporated may apply under the banner of an existing Coronabased non-profit so long as the registered non-profit takes full responsibility for the request and applies in their name.

C. Corona-Norco Unified School District (CNUSD) events may be considered for City cosponsorship if they are nationally televised or affiliated with a nationally televised program.

CNUSD events may also qualify under separate Joint Use Agreements.

MustD. Groups requesting City co-sponsorship must be based within the City of Corona or must have a local branch or non-profit affiliation within the City. Organizations with a nonprofit affiliation must submit a written letter from the non-profit verifying the affiliation.

E. The organization’sorganization's event must be designed to accomplish one or more of the following objectives:

1. Promote the City of Corona as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community.

1.2. Promote the City of Corona as a desirable place to live, visit or do business.

2.3. Promote the City of Corona as a visitor destination and/or bring tourism-- associated revenue to the City.

3.4. Enhance the quality of life and well-being of the residents of the City of Corona.

4.5. Advance the City’sCity's commitment to, and pride in, being a multicultural community.

5.6. Encourage the development of neighborhood identity and pride.

6.7. Promote cultural and artistic awareness within the community.

The City discourages co-sponsorship requests if: (1) the co-sponsorship request conflicts with other approved co-sponsorship events; and/or (2) the request conflicts with a City event.

Section 3.1 Co-Sponsorship Requests and Awards
A. All groups requesting City co-sponsorship must submit a written request for City funding or co-sponsorship of community events.

A. The City discourages co-sponsorship requests if: the co-sponsorship request conflicts with other approved co-sponsorship events, and/or the request conflicts with a City event.

B. All written requests must be received by the deadline(s) established each year, with

Administrative Policy 100.30 (Rev. 01-21-15) 06400.009 (12-04-24) Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14
funding to occur in the next fiscal year beginning July 1 and ending June 30. Notification of the deadline(s) for written requests will be communicated through a combination of press releases, letters and other City communication sources. Letters outlining this policy and procedural changes will be mailed to local community service groups. From written requests received, the Public Services Committee will determine which community co-sponsored events will be recommended for funding in the next fiscal year.

Requests that are recommended by the Public Services Committee will be used by Management Services to calculate the funding amount requested for Project No. 6380 in the City’s annual Capital Improvement Program Budget process, and a list of the approved co-sponsorships will be available from Management Services upon request.

C. From written requests received, the City Council will determine which community events will be approved for co-sponsorship in the next fiscal year, which will be allocated as part of the City's budget process. A list of the approved co-sponsorships will be available from the City upon request.

D. Accepted awards are non-transferable and cannot be used for any other purpose than what was originally proposed to the City in the requesting organization’s written request.

Should the organizer reschedule the event, request additional services, or change the event venue, the City’s standard fees will apply for any services beyond the original cosponsorship award. If the award will not be used, the request must be withdrawn by the requesting organizers. Requests for any other use, apart from what was originally proposed in the requesting organization’s written request, must go through the standard application process set forth above.

C.E. The Public Services Committee alsoCity Council has the authority to consider fundingcosponsoring additional community co-sponsored events at any time during the budget year, depending on thefunding availability of non-allocated funds within the CIP project..

Any such requests for co-sponsorship must also comply with the provisions stated in sections A through E above. The Committee may choose, at its discretion, to refer any request for co-sponsorship to the City Council for consideration, irrespective of the dollar amount of the requestthis policy.

Section 3.2 Use of City Logo
This policy also entitles a requesting organization that has been approved for co--sponsorship by the Committee or City Council to utilize the City logo in conjunction with its marketing efforts for the co-sponsored event.

Section 3.3 Ineligible Events
The City reserves the right to decline any co-sponsorship request if it is determined not to be in the best interests of the City or if it would otherwise create a conflict of interest for the City.

The City will decline co-sponsorship requests for the following:

Administrative Policy 100.30 (Rev. 01-21-15) 06400.009 (12-04-24) Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14
A. Organizations whose revenue is substantially derived from the sale of alcohol, illegal drugs or illegal drug paraphernalia, firearms or weapons, tobacco products, gambling or sexually-explicit materials.

B. Political organizations or organizations whose primary purpose is to act on behalf of, in support of, or in opposition to any political candidate, ballot measure or political position.

C. Events with the primary purpose of supporting or opposing any political candidate, ballot measure or political position.

D. Adult-oriented businesses or organizations.

E. Requests for similar, like, or recurrent activities that take place more than once per fiscal year.

F. Organizations that do not have a current non-profit status or evidence of financial good standing or regulatory compliance. Organizations that have previously been awarded co-sponsorship support must be in good standing with the City with respect to the organization’s prior events in terms of the event planning process, completing organizer requirements, safety requirements, quality of experience, and the successful delivery of the event as proposed to the City during the application period.

Section 3.4 Religious Organizations
Religious or sectarian organizations are not excluded from co-sponsorship consideration; however, the City’sCity's co-sponsorship of the religious or sectarian organization’sorganization's event must satisfy all three of the following criteria:

A. The City’sCity's co-sponsorship must serve a clearly secular legislative purpose (i.e. secular public purpose);
B. The City’sCity's co-sponsorship must have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and
C. The City’sCity's co-sponsorship must not create an excessive entanglement with religion.

Administrative Policy 100.30 (Rev. 01-21-15) 06400.009 (12-04-24) Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by ManagementCommunity Services/Public Services Committee (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.14

PRIOR VERSIONS
ISSUED: 01-21-15
REVISED: 12-04-24

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.15
Administrative Policy

ARTICLE I - PURPOSE
Section 1.1 General Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to facilitate community events open to the general public and provide police security for dignitary protection services. The Community Events CoSponsorship Program provides for City co-sponsorship of community events through in-kind contributions of City fees, City services and staff time. The Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program does not provide funding for third-party vendors, outside services, or any other costs or services that are not normally provided by the City for community events.

The Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program receives a "one-time" allocation each fiscal year into the community co-sponsored events project (No. 6380), depending on available funds.

Section 1.2 Superseded Policies
This policy supersedes and replaces the following policies, which are hereby eliminated in their entirety and are of no further force and effect:

Policy 07400.003 Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy

ARTICLE II - DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
Section 2.1 Definitions
None.

Title: COMMUNITIY EVENTS CO-SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM

FUNDING POLICY
Administered By: Community Services Department (Recreation) Policy No. Issue
Date
Revision
Date
Dept. Head
Approved
City Manager
Approved
Mayor
Approved
06400.009 12-18-24 N/A

Administrative Policy 06400.009 (12-04-24)
Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by Community Services (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.15
Section 2.2 General Scope
Unless otherwise stipulated herein, this policy applies to all City employees. All such employees shall comply with the provisions outlined in this policy. It is the responsibility of all supervision to ensure that the provisions outlined in this policy are enforced for those City employees under their authority.

Section 2.3 Exemptions from Scope
None.

ARTICLE III – COMMUNITY EVENTS CO-SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM
Section 3.1 Eligibility Criteria
To qualify for City co-sponsorship consideration under the Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program, a community organization and the event must meet all the following criteria:

A The Community event must be open to the public and inclusive of all residents.

B. Community groups, non-profit 501(c)(3) tax exempt organizations or other government agencies are eligible for City co-sponsorship. Non-profit status will be verified via the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Requesting agencies must have evidence of current nonprofit status, financial good standing, regulatory compliance and no outstanding debt owed to the City, State, or Federal government at time of application. New and emerging groups who have not yet been incorporated may apply under the banner of an existing Coronabased non-profit so long as the registered non-profit takes full responsibility for the request and applies in their name.

C. Corona-Norco Unified School District (CNUSD) events may be considered for City cosponsorship if they are nationally televised or affiliated with a nationally televised program.

CNUSD events may also qualify under separate Joint Use Agreements.

D. Groups requesting City co-sponsorship must be based within the City of Corona or must have a local branch or non-profit affiliation within the City. Organizations with a non-profit affiliation must submit a written letter from the non-profit verifying the affiliation.

E. The organization's event must be designed to accomplish one or more of the following objectives:

1. Promote the City of Corona as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community.

2. Promote the City of Corona as a desirable place to live, visit or do business.

3. Promote the City of Corona as a visitor destination and/or bring tourismassociated revenue to the City.

Administrative Policy 06400.009 (12-04-24)
Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by Community Services (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.15

4. Enhance the quality of life and well-being of the residents of the City of Corona.

5. Advance the City's commitment to, and pride in, being a multicultural community.

6. Encourage the development of neighborhood identity and pride.

7. Promote cultural and artistic awareness within the community.

The City discourages co-sponsorship requests if: (1) the co-sponsorship request conflicts with other approved co-sponsorship events; and/or (2) the request conflicts with a City event.

Section 3.1 Co-Sponsorship Requests and Awards
A. All groups requesting City co-sponsorship must submit a written request for City funding or co-sponsorship of community events.

B. All written requests must be received by the deadline(s) established each year, with funding to occur in the next fiscal year beginning July 1 and ending June 30. Notification of the deadline(s) for written requests will be communicated through a combination of press releases, letters and other City communication sources. Letters outlining this policy and procedural changes will be mailed to local community service groups.

C. From written requests received, the City Council will determine which community events will be approved for co-sponsorship in the next fiscal year, which will be allocated as part of the City's budget process. A list of the approved co-sponsorships will be available from the City upon request.

D. Accepted awards are non-transferable and cannot be used for any other purpose than what was originally proposed to the City in the requesting organization’s written request.

Should the organizer reschedule the event, request additional services, or change the event venue, the City’s standard fees will apply for any services beyond the original cosponsorship award. If the award will not be used, the request must be withdrawn by the requesting organizers. Requests for any other use, apart from what was originally proposed in the requesting organization’s written request, must go through the standard application process set forth above.

E. The City Council has the authority to consider co-sponsoring additional community events at any time during the budget year, depending on funding availability. Any such requests for co-sponsorship must comply with the provisions of this policy.

Section 3.2 Use of City Logo
This policy entitles a requesting organization that has been approved for co-sponsorship by the City Council to utilize the City logo in conjunction with its marketing efforts for the cosponsored event.

Administrative Policy 06400.009 (12-04-24)
Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by Community Services (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.15
Section 3.3 Ineligible Events
The City reserves the right to decline any co-sponsorship request if it is determined not to be in the best interests of the City or if it would otherwise create a conflict of interest for the City.

The City will decline co-sponsorship requests for the following:

A. Organizations whose revenue is substantially derived from the sale of alcohol, illegal drugs or illegal drug paraphernalia, firearms or weapons, tobacco products, gambling or sexually-explicit materials.

B. Political organizations or organizations whose primary purpose is to act on behalf of, in support of, or in opposition to any political candidate, ballot measure or political position.

C. Events with the primary purpose of supporting or opposing any political candidate, ballot measure or political position.

D. Adult-oriented businesses or organizations.

E. Requests for similar, like, or recurrent activities that take place more than once per fiscal year.

F. Organizations that do not have a current non-profit status or evidence of financial good standing or regulatory compliance. Organizations that have previously been awarded co-sponsorship support must be in good standing with the City with respect to the organization’s prior events in terms of the event planning process, completing organizer requirements, safety requirements, quality of experience, and the successful delivery of the event as proposed to the City during the application period.

Section 3.4 Religious Organizations
Religious or sectarian organizations are not excluded from co-sponsorship consideration; however, the City's co-sponsorship of the religious or sectarian organization's event must satisfy all three of the following criteria:

A. The City's co-sponsorship must serve a clearly secular legislative purpose (i.e. secular public purpose);
B. The City's co-sponsorship must have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and
C. The City's co-sponsorship must not create an excessive entanglement with religion.

Administrative Policy 06400.009 (12-04-24)
Community Events Co-Sponsorship Program Funding Policy
Administered by Community Services (Recreation)

JAMIER\13000.15000\10005052.15

PRIOR VERSIONS
ISSUED: 01-21-15
REVISED: 12-04-24

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Finance Department
2024-175

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This staff report asks the Council to consider budgetary adjustments for American Rescue Plan Act projects to meet the obligation deadline of December 31, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:
a. Approve budgetary adjustments, including funding reallocations and cash transfers, relating to the American Rescue Plan Act Projects as noted in the Analysis section.
b. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to prepare and process any budgetary and cash transfers to ensure the American Rescue Plan Act obligation deadline is met.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 appropriated nearly $220 billion to states, territories, and tribal areas, and $130 billion to cities and counties for pandemic relief.

Funds were distributed in block grant fashion. In the case of CDBG eligible cities (“metropolitan cities,” generally those with a population of 50,000 or larger), dollars are allocated according to the CDBG distribution formula, not by population. In the cases of

smaller cities and counties, it provides that dollars will be distributed solely by population.

The City of Corona received $29.2 million. The project options were initially presented to the City Council at the September 29, 2021, Fall Workshop.

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds have specific deadlines for obligation and use.
 December 31, 2024: Funds must be obligated. To meet this obligation requirement, funds must be encumbered to a purchase order or tied to an executed contract.
 December 31, 2026: Funds must be spent. Any unspent funds after this date must be returned to the U.S. Department of Treasury.

ANALYSIS:

At the Fall Policy Workshop on September 26, 2024, staff provided the City Council with an update of ARPA funds, including the recommendation to reallocate funds to meet the December 31, 2024, deadline in which funds must be fully obligated.

Based on the Fall Policy Workshop presentation, the City Council approved budgetary realignments and transfers on November 6, 2024, and December 4, 2024. After additional review of the projects and obligation (contract/purchase order) status, additional adjustments are needed to fully utilize all the ARPA funds allocated to the City.

In summary, the requested adjustments will allow the City to meet the December 31, 2024 obligation deadline. As a result, staff requests the following adjustments:

Fire Station Rebuild (76720)
 Budgetary transfer of $5,589.90 from the Business Grants Project (76760) to the Fire Station Rebuild Project (76720) within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.
6th Street Beautification and Revitalization (76730)
 Budgetary transfer of $6,284.28 from the Business Grants Project (76760) 413 to the 6th Street Beautification and Revitalization Project (76730) within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.

Traffic Signal Optimization (76740)
 Budgetary transfer of $3,443.10 from the Business Grants Project (76760) to the Traffic Signal Optimization Project (76740) within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.

Business Grants (76760)
 Budgetary transfer of $15,967.83 to multiple projects within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.
 Appropriation reduction of $83,788.23 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.

 Cash Transfer of $83,788.23 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413 to the Measure X Fund 120 for the City Park Revitalization Project (78340).

Communications Studio (76800)
 Appropriation reduction of $2,038.75 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.
 Cash Transfer of $2,038.75 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413 to the Measure X Fund 120 for the City Park Revitalization Project (78340).

Rental Assistance at the Historic Civic Center (76810)
 Budgetary transfer of $218.31 from the Business Grants Project (76760) to the Rental Assistance at the Historic Civic Center Project (76810) within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.

Computer Equipment at Senior Center (76850)
 Appropriation reduction of $0.37 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.  Cash Transfer of $0.37 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413 to the Measure X Fund 120 for the City Park Revitalization Project (78340).

South Mall Parking Lot Rehabilitation (79290)
 Budgetary transfer of $432.24 from the Business Grants Project (76760) to the South Mall Parking Lot Rehabilitation Project (79290) within the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Approval of the recommended actions will result in an appropriation reduction in the amount of $85,827.35 in the American Rescue Plan Act Fund 413. The appropriation reduction will allow for a cash transfer to Measure X Fund 120 to fund expenditures that have already been incurred or are currently obligated for the City Park Project. That project meets the criteria for funding under the ARPA guidelines. The recommended budgetary adjustments and cash transfers relating to the American Rescue Plan Act Projects are reflected in the following tables.

Budgetary Transfers
Project Name
Project
No. From To
Business Grants 76760
$
(15,967.83)
$
-
Fire Station Rebuild 76720

-

5,589.90
6th Street Beautification and Revitalization 76730

-

6,284.28
Traffic Signal Optimization 76740

-

3,443.10

Rental Assistance at the Historic Civic Center 76810

-

218.31
South Mall Parking Lot Rehabilitation 79290

-

432.24
Total
$
(15,967.83) $ 15,967.83
Appropriations
Fund Appropriations
Estimated
Revenue
Increase Net Impact
American Rescue Plan Act Fund (413)
$
(85,827.35)
$
-
$
(85,827.35)
Total
$
(85,827.35)
$
-
$
(85,827.35)
Cash Transfers
Fund Transfer In Transfer Out
Measure X Fund (120) $ 85,827.35
$
-
American Rescue Plan Act Fund (413)

-

(85,827.35)
Total
$
85,827.35
$
(85,827.35)
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This action is to approve budgetary adjustments for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, and there is no possibility that approval of the recommended actions will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required.

PREPARED BY: LUIS NAVARRO, BUDGET SUPERVISOR
REVIEWED BY: KIM SITTON, FINANCE DIRECTOR

DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Human Resources Department
2024-194

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024-114, APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF A

RETIRED ANNUITANT TO AN EXTRA HELP POSITION OF HUMAN RESOURCES

SPECIALIST AND CERTIFYING THAT THE APPOINTMENT IS NECESSARY TO FILL A CRITICALLY NEEDED POSITION SOONER THAN 180 DAYS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Human Resources is experiencing a critical number of vacancies, negatively impacting the Department’s ability to support the organization in various project areas. This staff report asks the City Council to adopt Resolution No. 2024-114, appointing a former employee to a temporary “extra help” position to provide much-needed assistance. Since the retired annuitant will be returning to the City within 180 days of the annuitant’s retirement, California Government Code Section 7522.56 requires that the City Council certify that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position sooner than 180 days and that such action may not be placed on a consent calendar.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-114, appointing Karen Pervorse to a part-time, temporary “extra help” position of Human Resources Specialist and certifying that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position sooner than 180 days.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

Separate from the Occupational Health and Safety Division responsibilities (which are fully staffed), the Human Resources Department is budgeted for a total staff size of 13.

Currently, 5 positions are vacant. These include the Human Resources Manager (1), Human Resources Supervisor (1), Human Resources Analyst (2), and Human Resources Assistant (1). Additionally, the Senior Human Resources Analyst is currently on medical leave. This means that nearly half of the positions typically supporting recruitment, classification and compensation, labor negotiations, employee relations, and benefits/leave administration for the whole organization are vacant. Although we are recruiting to fill the Department’s vacancies, our current staffing level is insufficient to provide the level of service needed to serve the Corona organization adequately.

Karen Pervorse retired from the City on July 5, 2024, as a Human Resources Specialist and has expressed a willingness to provide extra help on a temporary basis. Having started with Corona in 2007, she has 17 years of familiarity with the organization and 6 years specifically as a Human Resources Specialist. This background leaves her wellprepared to hit the ground running and provide much-needed support to the Department.

ANALYSIS:

Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224 permit the City Council to appoint a CalPERS retiree to an “extra help” position and provides that such appointment will not subject the retired person to reinstatement from retirement or loss of benefits so long as it is a single appointment that does not exceed 960 hours, inclusive of hours worked for other CalPERS employers during the same period, in a fiscal year.

Such an appointment will not subject the retired person to reinstatement from retirement or loss of benefits so long as:
 The retired annuitant has the specialized skills needed to perform work of limited duration.
 Compensation for the appointment does not include incentives or benefit and is limited to an hourly rate that is not more than the maximum nor less than the minimum hourly equivalent available for the Human Resources Specialist classification, as identified on the City’s publicly available pay schedule;  Hours worked in all retired annuitant appointments for the retired annuitant are limited to 960 in a single fiscal year;
 The retired annuitant certifies in writing upon acceptance of the employment offer that he/she has not received unemployment insurance compensation payments arising as a result of prior employment subject to the CalPERS working after retirement rules in the 12 months preceding the appointment start date;
 The retired annuitant is either at least “normal retirement age,” or there was no verbal or written agreement to return to work before retirement, and there was a separation in service of at least 60 days; and
 The appointment either begins no earlier than 180 days after the retired annuitant’s retirement date or the employer’s governing body (the Corona City Council, in this case) certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position sooner than 180 days.

Resolution No. 2024-114 (Exhibit 1), which includes Karen Pervorse’s employment agreement letter, addresses all these provisions.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Karen Pervorse will be paid an hourly rate of $33.54, which is no less than the minimum nor more than the maximum hourly rate paid to a person serving in the Human Resources Specialist classification, as required by CalPERS regulations. She will not be entitled to additional compensation, overtime, benefits, paid leave, or paid holidays. The Department has significant salary savings to cover the salary expenditures; therefore, no additional appropriation is necessary.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which states that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

This action to appoint a retired annuitant is not a project within the scope of CEQA, and there is no possibility that adopting this resolution will have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, no environmental analysis is required, and staff will file a Notice of Exemption with the County of Riverside.

PREPARED BY: MARCELLA MARLOWE, INTERIM HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER REVIEWED BY: LORI SASSOON, CHIEF TALENT OFFICER
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit 1 – Resolution No. 2024-114

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-114

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONA

APPOINTING RETIRED ANNUITANT KAREN PERVORSE TO THE

EXTRA HELP LIMITED TERM POSITION OF HUMAN RESOURCES

SPECIALIST, CERTIFYING THE NATURE OF THE EMPLOYMENT,

AND CERTIFYING THAT THE APPOINTMENT IS NECESSARY TO
FILL A CRITICALY NEEDED POSITION SOONER THAN 180 DAYS,
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 7522.56 AND 21224
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224 address the temporary employment of retirees in accordance with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law, as administered by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), and permits the City Council to appoint a retired annuitant to an extra help position requiring specialized skills for a limited duration and provides that such appointment will not subject the retired person to reinstatement from retirement or loss of benefits so long as certain criteria are met; and WHEREAS, the Corona Human Resources Department is experiencing a significant number of vacant positions that is negatively and critically impacting its ability to support the operations of the citywide organization;
WHEREAS, for a limited term period, the City Council desires to appoint Karen Pervorse as a retired annuitant to an extra help position of Human Resources Specialist for the City under Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224, effective December 19, 2024, to provide support for the human resources function of the City; and
WHEREAS, Karen Pervorse has 17 years of experience with the City of Corona, including six years as a Human Resources Specialist, meaning that she has the specialized skills needed to perform this work of limited duration; and
WHEREAS, Karen Pervorse retired from the City of Corona on July 5, 2024, resulting in a separation of at least 60 sixty days; and
WHEREAS, there was no oral or written agreement with Karen Pervorse for her to return to work prior to her retirement with the City; and
WHEREAS, the employment agreement between Karen Pervorse and the City has been reviewed by this body and is attached here as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, it is understood by the City and Karen Pervorse that the combined total hours to be served by Ms. Pervorse in any fiscal year, for all positions and for all CalPERS employers combined, shall not exceed the 960-hour limitation set forth in California Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224; and

2 WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and
WHEREAS, the minimum monthly salary for the Human Resources Specialist position is $4783 and the hourly equivalent is $27.59, and the maximum monthly salary for this position is $5813 and the hourly equivalent is $33.54; and
WHEREAS, the hourly rate to be paid to Karen Pervorse for her services as Human Resources Specialist on an extra help basis is $33.54, subject to any subsequent adjustment to the payrate as adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Karen Pervorse has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or any other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 7522.56(e)(1), Karen Pervorse must certify in writing to the City, upon accepting an offer of employment, that she has not received any unemployment insurance compensation arising out of prior employment with a public employer that is subject to Section 7522.56 during the 12-month period preceding the effective date of this appointment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Karen Pervorse has the specialized skills needed to perform the work required to fulfill the responsibilities of Human Resources Specialist on an extra help basis for a limited duration of time.

Section 3. The Council hereby certifies the nature of the employment and determines that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position sooner than 180 days.

Section 4. The Council hereby appoints Karen Pervorse as Human Resources Specialist on an extra help, limited term basis, effective December 19, 2024, to provide the critically needed specialized functions of Human Resources Specialist, pursuant to the authority provided under Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224.

Section 5. The employment agreement with Karen Pervorse, a copy of which is attached here as Exhibit A and will be maintained on file with the City, is approved by the City Council.

Section 6. The City Manager is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City, with such technical amendments as may be deemed appropriate by the City Manager and City

3 Attorney.

Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution, and the City Clerk shall attest thereto, and this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Corona, California on the 18th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

____________________________________
Mayor of the City of Corona, California
ATTEST:
________________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California

4 I, Sylvia Edwards, City Clerk of the City of Corona, California, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-114 was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Corona, California, at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Corona, California, this 18th day of December, 2024. ________________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Corona, California
[SEAL]

City of Corona • 400 S. Vicentia Ave. Corona, CA 92882 • (951) 736-2400

3. TERMS.

3.1 Duties. In accordance with Reso ution No. 2024-114, the City Counci has appointed Retiree as an extra he p imited duration Human Resources Specia ist pursuant to the terms set forth in this Agreement. The City Manager (or his designee) sha have the authority to determine the means and manner by which Retiree sha perform those duties and functions. Retiree agrees to devote a of her business time (subject to the hour y imitation noted above), ski , attention, and best efforts to the discharge of the duties and functions assigned to her pursuant to this Agreement and by the City Manager (or his designee).

3.2 City Documents. A data, studies, reports and other documents prepared by Retiree whi e performing her duties during the term of this Agreement sha be furnished to and become the property of the City, without restriction or imitation on their use. A ideas, memoranda, specifications, p ans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information and other materia s either created by or provided to Retiree in connection with the performance of this Agreement sha be he d confidentia by Retiree. Such materia s sha not, without the prior written consent of the City Counci , be used by Retiree for any purposes other than the performance of her duties, nor sha such materia s be disc osed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of services under this Agreement, except as required by aw.

3.3 Conditions of Employment.

3.3.1 Part Time Authorized. Retiree is expected to devote necessary time, within norma business hours for the position’s needs, to the business of the City. However, in accordance with statutory imitations, Retiree sha not work under this Agreement for more than a tota of 960 hours in any fisca year, un ess an exception app ies. It is understood by both parties that emp oyment with other Ca PERS emp oyers sha count against the 960 hours per fisca year imitation, un ess an exception app ies. In the event Retiree is providing services to any other Ca PERS Agencies during the term of this Agreement, Retiree must notify the City of such emp oyment and disc ose on a periodic basis (at a frequency determined by the City) the number of hours Retiree is performing services for that other pub ic agency. Notwithstanding the preceding, Retiree sha be responsib e for ensuring that she does not work in excess of 960 hours in a fisca year, taking into account hours worked for any Ca PERS Agency during the same fisca year, un ess an exception app ies. Retiree sha be a owed to estab ish a schedu e that is ess than fu time in order to maximize the use of the 960 hours throughout an entire fisca year, provided, however, that Retiree’s schedu e sha be acceptab e to the City Manager (or his designee) and be estab ished in advance.

Retiree’s position sha be deemed a NON-EXEMPT position under Ca ifornia wage and hour aw. The position is a temporary, hour y assignment which sha not exceed 40 hours per week. The City, through the City Manager or his designee, wi assign Retiree hours to work. Due to the nature of the position, it is understood that the workday and work week hours may vary; however, Employee shall not work overtime.

3.3.2 No Conflicts. During the term of this Agreement, Retiree sha not engage in any business or transaction or maintain a financia interest which conflicts, or reasonab y might be expected to conflict, with the proper discharge of Retiree’s duties under this Agreement.

City of Corona • 400 S. Vicentia Ave. Corona, CA 92882 • (951) 736-2400

3.4 Compensation; No Fringe Benefits.

3.4.1 Compensation. For services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Retiree sha be compensated at the hour y rate of $33.54. The City has confirmed that this rate is not ess than the minimum, nor in excess of the maximum, paid by the City to other emp oyees performing comparab e duties as isted on the City’s pub ic y-avai ab e pay schedu e. This hour y rate is estab ished pursuant to statutory requirements and may on y be modified if permitted thereby. The compensation sha be paid at the same time and in the same manner as wages are usua y paid to City emp oyees and sha be subject to a app icab e taxes, and other required deductions. Such compensation sha be Retiree’s so e compensation for her services under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City sha pay for workers’ compensation insurance for Retiree. Retiree sha not be entit ed to any additiona benefits provided by the City to its emp oyees, inc uding, but not imited to, paid vacation, paid ho iday eave, paid sick eave, medica insurance, denta insurance, ife insurance, deferred compensation, disabi ity insurance, unemp oyment insurance, and vehic e a owance.

3.5 Term; Termination.

3.5.1 Term. The term of this Agreement sha be effective as of December 19, 2024, ending on the date the Retiree has served 960 hours in a fisca year or that this appointment is terminated by the City or Retiree in accordance with Section 3.5.2.

3.5.2 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause at any time upon fifteen (15) days advance written notice given by Retiree to City or immediate y upon notice by City to Retiree. No compensation or severance payment of any kind sha be payab e upon termination of this Agreement, other than any compensation due and owing under this Agreement through the ast effective date of emp oyment. The Parties understand and agree that the temporary emp oyment re ationship created by this Agreement is “at-wi ” and that the Retiree sha serve at the wi and p easure of the City Manager (or his designee), and may be terminated at any time, without notice and with or without cause.

Nothing in this Agreement, any statute, ordinance, or ru e sha prevent, imit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the City Manager (or his designee) to terminate, without cause or right of appea or grievance, the services of the Retiree at any time and without notice. Notice of termination may be de ivered persona y or by mai .

3.6 Notices. A notices permitted or required under this Agreement sha be given to the respective parties at the fo owing address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose, by deposit in the custody of the United States Posta Service, postage pre-paid, addressed as fo ows:

CITY: City of Corona
400 S. Vicentia Ave
Corona, CA 92882
ATTN: Chief Ta ent Officer
RETIREE: ADDRESS ON FILE

City of Corona • 400 S. Vicentia Ave. Corona, CA 92882 • (951) 736-2400 A ternative y, notices required pursuant to this Agreement may be persona y served in the manner as is app icab e to civi judicia practice. Notice sha be deemed given as of the date of persona service or as of the date of deposit of such written notice in the United States Posta Service.

3.7 Indemnification. The City sha defend, ho d harm ess and indemnify Retiree against any tort, professiona iabi ity, c aim or demand or other ega action, whether ground ess or otherwise, arising out of an a eged act or omission occurring in the performance of Retiree’s services as an extra he p imited duration Human Resources Specia ist, except that this provision sha not app y with respect to any intentiona tort or crime committed by Retiree, or any actions outside the course and scope of her emp oyment as an extra he p imited duration Human Resources Specia ist.

3.8 General Provisions.

3.8.1 Integration. This Agreement constitutes the so e and comp ete agreement between the parties. This Agreement supersedes any ordinance, ru e, regu ation, po icy, or procedure of the City that is inconsistent with the Agreement. No amendments to this Agreement may be made except in writing and signed by the parties.

3.8.2 Severability. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this Agreement is he d unconstitutiona , inva id or unenforceab e, the remainder of this Agreement, or portion thereof, sha be deemed severab e, sha not be affected and sha remain in fu force and effect.

3.8.3 Bonding. If app icab e, the City sha bear the fu cost of any fide ity or other bonds required of Retiree in the performance of her duties as an extra he p imited duration Human Resources Specia ist.

3.8.4 Modification. Any modification to this Agreement wi be effective on y if it is in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.8.5 Effect of Waiver. The fai ure of either Party to insist on strict comp iance with any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement by the other Party sha not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant, or condition, nor sha any waiver or re inquishment of any right or power at any one time or times be deemed a waiver or re inquishment of that right or power for a or any other times.

3.8.6 Assignment. Neither this Agreement, nor any right, privi ege or ob igation of Retiree hereunder sha be assigned or transferred by her without the prior written consent of the City Manager. Any attempt at assignment or transfer in vio ation of this provision sha , at the option of the City Manager, be nu and void and may be considered a materia breach of this Agreement.

3.8.7 Governing Law. This Agreement sha be governed by and construed in accordance with the aws of the State of Ca ifornia. Venue sha be in the County of Riverside, Ca ifornia.

3.8.8 No Presumption of Drafter. The Parties acknow edge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement have been negotiated and discussed between the Parties, and this Agreement reflects their mutua agreement regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. Because of the nature of such negotiations and discussions, it wou d be inappropriate to deem any Party to be the drafter of this

City of Corona • 400 S. Vicentia Ave. Corona, CA 92882 • (951) 736-2400 Agreement and, therefore, no presumption for or against va idity or as to any interpretation hereof, based upon the identity of the drafter sha be app icab e in interpreting or enforcing this Agreement.

3.8.9 Assistance of Counsel. Each Party to this Agreement warrants to the other Party that it has either had the assistance of counse in negotiation for, and preparation of, this Agreement or cou d have had such assistance and vo untari y dec ined to obtain such assistance.

3.8.10 Retiree Certifications. In accordance with Government Code Sections 7522.56(e)(1) and (g), Retiree certifies and represents to City that she has not received any unemp oyment insurance compensation arising out of prior emp oyment during the 12-month period prior to the appointment described in this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Corona has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed on its beha f by its City Manager, and du y attested by its City C erk, and Retiree has signed and executed this Agreement, effective on the day and year first above written.

We we come you to your imited-term extra he p appointment with the City of Corona and extend our best wishes for your success. If you have any additiona questions, p ease fee free to contact me direct y.

Sincere y,
________________________________
Lori Sassoon
Chief Talent Officer

CITY OF CORONA
__________________________________
Jacob E is, City Manager
Date: ______________________________

RETIREE
___________________________________
Karen Pervorse
Date: _______________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City C erk of Corona, Ca ifornia
APPROVED AS TO FORM (optiona ):
____________________________________
City Attorney

City of Corona Page 1 of 11
DATE: 12/18/2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Human Resources Department
2024-168

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF VARIOUS ACTIONS RELATED TO COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS FOR CITY

EMPLOYEES, AND OTHER RELATED EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ACTIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

City Council consideration of the updated Memorandums of Understanding with the Corona Public Service Employees Association, Corona Supervisors Association, Corona Firefighters Association, Corona Police Employees Association, and Corona Police Supervisors Association; Resolutions concerning the Executive, Management, and Confidential Groups; Amended and Restated Employment Agreements for the City Manager and the City Attorney/Legal & Risk Management Director; and a resolution delegating authority under Section 31.3(2)(H) of the CFA MOU concerning disciplinary procedures. The updated Memorandums of Understanding and Resolutions include market-based base pay increases, cafeteria plan allowance changes, modifications to other benefits, and other modifications to clarify the current language. The City Council will also consider approval of the updated Position Library and Compensation Plan, which includes increases for part-time positions, repeal of all prior plans, and budgetary adjustments associated with the proposed changes. The updated Memorandums of Understanding will be effective January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027, with compensation adjustments effective with the pay period that begins December 28, 2024.

The updated resolutions and employment agreements will be effective January 1, 2025, until repealed or revised; compensation adjustments in those documents are also effective with the pay period that begins December 28, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council:

City of Corona Page 2 of 11
a. Adopt the Corona Public Service Employees Association Memorandum of Understanding.
b. Adopt the Corona Supervisors Association Memorandum of Understanding. c. Adopt the Corona Police Employees Association Memorandum of Understanding. d. Adopt the Corona Police Supervisors Association Memorandum of Understanding. e. Adopt the Corona Firefighters Association Memorandum of Understanding. f. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-116, governing compensation and benefits of nonrepresented Confidential Group employees. g. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-115, governing compensation and benefits of nonrepresented Management Group employees. h. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-118, governing compensation and benefits of nonrepresented Executive Group employees. i. Approve the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for the City Manager. j. Approve the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for the City Attorney/Legal & Risk Management Director.
k. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-117, delegating its authority under Section 31.3(2)(H) of the Corona Firefighters Association IAFF Local # 3757 Memorandum of Understanding concerning disciplinary matters.
l. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-112, adopting the City of Corona Position Library and Compensation Plan.

BACKGROUND & HISTORY:

The California Meyers Milias Brown Act (MMBA) requires the City to meet and confer, in good faith, with its bargaining groups on all matters relating to employment conditions and employer-employee relations, including, but not limited to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.

Accordingly, pursuant to the MMBA, the City began negotiations with the employee associations in April 2024. The City’s bargaining groups are organized as follows:
 The Corona Public Service Employees Association (CPSEA) represents all non-supervisory, miscellaneous, non-sworn positions.
 The Corona Police Employees Association (CPEA) represents all sworn Police personnel in the classifications of Police Officer, Corporal, and Detective.  The Corona Police Supervisors Association (CPSA) represents all sworn Police personnel in the classifications of Sergeant, Lieutenants, and Captain.
 The Corona Firefighters Association (CFA) represents all sworn Fire Department personnel in the classifications of Firefighter Trainee, Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic, Engineer, Battalion Chief, and Deputy Fire Chief. It also represents the personnel in the Fire Inspector/Fire Marshal series within the department.
 The Corona Supervisors Association (CSA) represents the City’s supervisory, non-sworn classifications.

City of Corona Page 3 of 11
In addition to these represented groups, the city has unrepresented employees that have been historically organized into informal groups as follows:
 The Management/Confidential group includes management employees and other employees considered “confidential” due to the nature of their work, such as certain IT and HR employees.  The Executive group consists of the City’s Directors, Attorneys, and Chiefs.  A bargaining unit does not represent part-time employees.

The City Manager and City Attorney/Legal , and risk Management Director are independent classifications not included in any other groups.

The original MOUs for CPSEA, CPEA, CPSA, CSA, and CFA will expire on December 31, 2024.

Pursuant to the MMBA, the City has been negotiating with these groups for a successor MOU. After meeting and conferring in good faith, the City has reached an agreement with each of these groups for new, three-year MOUs that will expire on December 31, 2027.

The resolutions that govern compensation and benefits for the Management, Confidential, and Executive employees have also been reviewed, and updates are recommended as part of this action. While in prior years, Management and Confidential Group compensation and benefits were contained in a single resolution, each group now has a separate resolution to detail its compensation and benefits structure, which varies between the groups.

Considering the compensation and benefit adjustments recommended for these other groups, similar adjustments for the City Manager and City Attorney have also been proposed and are included in Amended/Restated Employment Agreements that are also recommended for approval.

Finally, salary adjustments are also included for the City's part-time workforce based on the compensation changes for full-time employees and the California minimum wage increasing to $16.50 per hour in January 2025.

ANALYSIS:

The negotiation process with all represented groups involved multiple meetings to discuss terms and conditions of employment. Negotiations have focused on bringing employee compensation nearer to market levels, using market-based salary adjustments to assist with the recruitment and retention of a high-quality workforce. The City has been challenged in recent years with recruitment and retention; improving overall compensation relative to the market is an important part of addressing that challenge. The City provides its services through its people, and retaining a high-quality workforce is foundational to providing services and fulfilling its Mission and Vision.

The key terms and changes to each MOU are summarized below. Additionally, the Council will note that the Confidential and Management groups of unrepresented employees, previously covered by a single resolution, will now have separate salary and benefit resolutions.

CPSEA:
 Term of the Contract: The new agreement t e r m is for three (3) years, beginning

City of Corona Page 4 of 11
January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.
 Base pay increases: As Appendix A of the MOU indicates, employee salaries will be adjusted each year over the three-year term. In the first two years, salary adjustments to each position vary based on market compensation data considered during the bargaining process and used to inform the salary placements. In Year 3 of the agreement, all employees will receive a 3% increase in base pay.
 Cafeteria Allowance: Effective January 1, 2025, the City’s maximum contribution toward medical coverage will be $2,173 per month for employees plus two or more dependents coverage, $1,646 per month for employees plus one dependent coverage, and $978 per month for employee-only coverage. These contributions will increase again in 2026 and 2027, as Article 10 of the MOU indicates.
 Eliminating Tiers 3 and 4: The City had previously categorized employees into four “tiers” based on their hiring dates and their corresponding eligibility for retiree medical benefits.

Other benefits, such as contributions to Retiree Healthcare Savings (RHS) accounts and deferred compensation accounts, had been less than the amounts provided to other employees or not provided in any amount, depending upon the applicable tier.

This MOU eliminates both Tiers 3 and 4, leaving just two tiers of hires – those before 1/1/1999 (Tier 1), and those hired after that date (Tier 2). All Tier 2 employees will receive the same RHS and deferred compensation contributions, improving those benefits for the City’s newer employees and future hires. Other than the expansion of eligibility to receive the RHS and deferred compensation contributions for newer employees, there are no other changes to the benefits with this action.
 Other Adjustments: Other adjustments include incorporating language from previouslyapproved side-letters; expanding the number of classifications that receive standby pay weekly when on a standby assignment; expanding the list of classifications eligible for certification pays in the Utilities Department; changes to language regarding paid meal periods for certain classifications; updates to safety boot language; updates to leave use language to coincide with statutory changes; and making other clarifying changes to MOU language.

CSA:
 Term of the Contract: The new agreement t e r m is for three (3) years, beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.
 Base pay increases: Employee salaries will be adjusted each year over the three-year term, as Appendix A of the MOU indicates. In the first two years, salary adjustments to each position vary based on market compensation data that was considered during the bargaining process and used to inform the salary placements. In Year 3 of the agreement, all employees will receive a 3% increase in base pay.
 Cafeteria Allowance: Effective January 1, 2025, the City’s maximum contribution toward

City of Corona Page 5 of 11
medical coverage will be equal to the current Kaiser rates for the City’s plan in this region plus vision and dental coverage ($2,579 per month for employee plus two or more dependents coverage, $1,956 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage, and $978 per month for employee-only coverage). These contributions will increase again in 2026 and 2027 by 5% each year, as specified in Article 8 of the MOU.  Eliminating Tiers 3 and 4: Like in the CPSEA MOU, This MOU eliminates both Tiers 3 and 4, leaving just two tiers of hires – those prior to 1/1/1999 (Tier 1), and those hired after that date (Tier 2). All Tier 2 employees will now receive the same RHS and deferred compensation contributions, improving those benefits for the City’s newer employees and future hires. Other than the expansion of eligibility to receive the RHS and deferred compensation contributions for newer employees, there are no other changes to the benefits with this action.
 Other Adjustments: Other adjustments include incorporating language from previouslyapproved side-letters; eliminating standby pay; updating boot allowance; updates to leave use language to coincide with statutory changes; and making other clarifying changes to MOU language.

CPEA and CPSA:
 Term of the Contract: The new agreement is for a three (3) year term, beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.
 Base pay increases: Employee salaries will be adjusted each year over the three year term, as indicated in Appendix A of the MOU. In the first two years, salary adjustments to each position vary based on the market compensation data that was considered during the bargaining process and used to inform the salary placements. In Year 3 of the agreement, all employees will receive a 3% increase in base pay.
 Cafeteria Allowance: Effective January 1, 2025, the City’s maximum contribution toward medical coverage will be $2,173 per month for employee plus two or more dependents coverage, $1,646 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage, and $978 per month for employee-only coverage. These contributions will increase again in 2026 and 2027 as indicated in the MOUs. The groups also agree not to request to reopen the MOU’s to discuss these cafeteria allowances during the contract term.  Eliminating Tier 4: Like the other groups, these MOUs had previously categorized employees into four “tiers” based on their hiring dates, and their corresponding eligibility for retiree medical benefits. This MOU eliminates 4, leaving three tiers of hires – those hired before 1/1/2000 (Tier 1), those hired between 1/1/2000 and 10/12/2007 (Tier 2); those on or after 10/13/2007 (Tier 3). Other than these changes, there are no changes to retiree medical benefits.
 Other Adjustments: Other changes to this MOU included adjusting leave accruals for those with 16 years or more of service; adding special assignment pays for certain roles and

City of Corona Page 6 of 11
clarifying special assignment language; modifying tuition reimbursement repayment language for members who retire due to an industrial disability; updates to leave use language to coincide with statutory changes; and making other clarifying changes to MOU language.

CFA:
 Term of the Contract: The new agreement is for a three (3) year term, beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.
 Base pay increases: Employee salaries will be adjusted each year over the three year term, as indicated in Appendix A of the MOU. In the first two years, salary adjustments to each position vary based on the market compensation data that was considered during the bargaining process and used to inform the salary placements. In Year 3 of the agreement, all employees will receive a 3% increase in base pay.
 Cafeteria Allowance: Effective January 1, 2025, the City’s maximum contribution toward medical coverage will be $2,408 per month for employee plus two or more dependents coverage, $1,853 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage, and $926 per month for employee-only coverage for the term of the MOU.  Elimination of Tier 4: Like the other groups, the Tier 4 is eliminated in this MOU. This provides an additional benefit to newer employees, who in Tier 4 had been receiving a lower level of City contribution to their RHS accounts.
 Other Adjustments: Other changes to this MOU include an increase in secondary paramedic pay (from $445.42 to $500.00 per month); a new reimbursement of $500 for a body scan for every 10 years of city service; agreement to review bilingual testing standards and methodology; correction to annual leave accrual rates; updates to leave use language to coincide with statutory changes; and other clarifications to MOU language.

Confidential Group:
 Term: The new resolution addresses salaries and benefits for a three (3) year term, beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.
 Base pay increases: Employee salaries will be adjusted each year over the three year term, as indicated in Attachment A of the resolution. In the first two years, salary adjustments to each position vary based on the market compensation data that was considered during the bargaining process and used to inform the salary placements. In Year 3 of the agreement, all employees will receive a 3% increase in base pay.
 Cafeteria Allowance: Effective January 1, 2025, the City’s maximum contribution toward medical coverage will be equal to the current Kaiser rates for the City’s plan for this region plus vision and dental coverage ($2,579 per month for employee plus two or more dependents coverage, $1,956 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage, and