Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Costa Mesa City Council
April 7, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
April 7, 2026
Body
Costa Mesa City Council
Pages
33
Original file
56.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on costamesa.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

526
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
· Act in the Public Interest
· Comply with the Law
· Conduct of Members
· Respect for Process
· Conduct of Public Meetings
· Decisions Based on Merit
· Communication
· Conflict of Interest
· Gifts and Favors
· Confidential Information
· Use of Public Resources
· Representation of Private Interests
· Advocacy
· Policy role of Members
· Independence of Boards, Commissions, and Committees
· Positive Workplace Environment
· Implementation
· Compliance and Enforcement
· Statement of Commitment
As part of the implementation, the Policy ensures that all elected and appointed officials and employees in covered positions have received a copy of the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and that they understand its provisions, and pledge to conduct their duties in accordance with the code. The code will also be incorporated into the Commissions and Committees Handbook, orientation programs, and other training efforts to further clarify its provisions and application.

Provisions Covered By Existing Laws
Many of the topics covered in the proposed Code are the subject of state, federal and local laws and judicial decisions. Those laws are scattered throughout the United States and California Constitutions, the United States Code, the California Government Code, the California Labor Code, the California Penal Code, the California Code of Regulations, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and Attorney General decisions, and the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

For example, both the United States and California Constitutions contain due process requirements that require decision makers to be fair and impartial in decision making affecting property rights. U.S.

Const., Amend. V, Cal. Const. Art. 1, § 7. The California Constitution and statutes protect the right of privacy of both citizens and employees. See e.g., Cal. Const. Art. 1, § 1; Cal. Civ. Code § 56.20 (confidentiality of medical information). California Labor Code sections provide a number of protections to both public and private employees, including the right to be free of retaliation for complaining of misconduct or providing evidence in connection with such reports. California Labor Code section 1102.5.

The Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000, et seq.) includes numerous provisions on conflicts of interest stemming from financial interests (Government Code section 87100, et seq.), filing of an annual Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) (Government Code section 87200, et

Page 2 of 4 ends

527
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
filing of an annual Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) (Government Code section 87200, et seq.), requires the City to adopt a conflict of interest code (Government Code section 87300, et seq.), and post-employment lobbying (Government Code section 87406.3, covering only elected officials and agency manager). Other statutory provisions regulate participation in decisions affecting campaign donors (Government Code section 84308), prohibition on honoraria (Government Code section 89501, et seq.) and restrictions on gifts (Government Code section 89503). Use of public funds for improper purposes is precluded by Penal Code section 424 and Government Code section 8314. The California Code of Regulations includes many regulations which explain and implement the Political Reform Act. 2 Cal. Code Reg. § 18700, et seq. Both Attorney General Opinions and FPPC decisions provide interpretation and application of the regulations as guidance. In addition, the Costa Mesa Municipal Code contains restrictions on participating in decisions materially affecting financial interests. CMMC § 2-403.

Government Officials are precluded from having a financial interest in a contract made by them or the legislative body of which they are a member, with some exceptions. California Government Code section 1090, et seq. The Ralph M. Brown Act., California Government Code section 54950, et seq., restricts conduct of city business outside of noticed and public meetings, provides for closed sessions and precludes disclosure of confidential information obtained in closed session. Cal. Gov’tCode § 54963. The California Government Code and the Costa Mesa Municipal Code establish a council/manager form of government, in which the City Council makes policy and the policy direction provided by the Council as a body is carried out by the City Manager. Cal. Gov’tCode §§ 34851- 34859; see CMMC § 2-106 (council to deal with administrative matters through City Manager).

Addressing Topics Not Covered by Existing Laws
Civility, respectful communications, relations with commissioners and members of the public, enforcement procedures for non-statutory violations and distribution of a code of conduct are not covered specifically by these various laws. Post-employment advocacy restrictions under existing law apply only to council members and the City Manager. One potential benefit of adopting a Code of Conduct is the collection in a single document of many of the laws and best practices in local government.

The revised draft policy is provided as Attachment 2. Attachment 3 is a blacklined comparison of the draft considered in February to the current draft. Attachment 4 is the current draft policy, which is highlighted to delineate provisions which are reflective of state or federal law.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may adopt the code with changes, not adopt the code or provide alternative direction to staff on the Code of Ethics and Conduct.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office prepared the revised draft Code of Conduct and this report.

Page 3 of 4 ends

528
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item is administrative.

CONCLUSION:

The purpose of this item is to consider approval of a Code of Ethics and Conduct.

Page 4 of 4 ends

529

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
TITLE:

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE/CITY CLERK DIVISION, CITY ATTORNEY PRESENTED BY: BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
CONTACT INFORMATION: BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK (714) 754-5221 RECOMMENDATION:

Consider approval of a Code of Ethics and Conduct.

BACKGROUND:

The goal of the Code of Ethics and Conduct is to ensure public confidence in the integrity of local government elected and appointed officials. The priority is to establish an ethics code to promote an honest, effective, and accountable city government, encourage high standards of behavior by public officials, and assist with decision-making. The code’sframework is designed to guide public officials in their daily duties to help ensure that they exercise their public responsibilities without conflicts or improprieties, whether actual or perceived.

On July 8, 2025, the Council discussed potential adoption of a Code of Ethics and Conduct, giving direction to staff regarding potential provisions of such a code to be considered at a future City Council meeting for approval. Staff drafted a Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials modeled on the City of Gardena Code of Ethics and Conduct, but including several provisions from the City of Irvine policy as requested. See Attachment 1 (prior draft).

On February 3, 2026, the City Council considered a draft Code of Ethics and Conduct, and ultimately directed staff to return to City Council on April 7, 2026 with a revised draft.

ANALYSIS:

The intent of the Code of Ethics and Conduct is to achieve fair, ethical, and accountable local government for the City of Costa Mesa. The people of Costa Mesa expect public officials, both elected and appointed, to comply with both the letter and the spirit of the law.

The following are the issue areas addressed and components of the proposed Code of Ethics and Conduct:

Page 1 of 4 ends

530
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
· Act in the Public Interest
· Comply with the Law
· Conduct of Members
· Respect for Process
· Conduct of Public Meetings
· Decisions Based on Merit
· Communication
· Conflict of Interest
· Gifts and Favors
· Confidential Information
· Use of Public Resources
· Representation of Private Interests
· Advocacy
· Policy role of Members
· Independence of Boards, Commissions, and Committees
· Positive Workplace Environment
· Implementation
· Compliance and Enforcement
· Statement of Commitment
As part of the implementation, the Policy ensures that all elected and appointed officials and employees in covered positions have received a copy of the Code of Ethics and Conduct, and that they understand its provisions, and pledge to conduct their duties in accordance with the code. The code will also be incorporated into the Commissions and Committees Handbook, orientation programs, and other training efforts to further clarify its provisions and application.

Provisions Covered By Existing Laws
Many of the topics covered in the proposed Code are the subject of state, federal and local laws and judicial decisions. Those laws are scattered throughout the United States and California Constitutions, the United States Code, the California Government Code, the California Labor Code, the California Penal Code, the California Code of Regulations, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and Attorney General decisions, and the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

For example, both the United States and California Constitutions contain due process requirements that require decision makers to be fair and impartial in decision making affecting property rights. U.S.

Const., Amend. V, Cal. Const. Art. 1, § 7. The California Constitution and statutes protect the right of privacy of both citizens and employees. See e.g., Cal. Const. Art. 1, § 1; Cal. Civ. Code § 56.20 (confidentiality of medical information). California Labor Code sections provide a number of protections to both public and private employees, including the right to be free of retaliation for complaining of misconduct or providing evidence in connection with such reports. California Labor Code section 1102.5.

The Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000, et seq.) includes numerous provisions on conflicts of interest stemming from financial interests (Government Code section 87100, et seq.), filing of an annual Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) (Government Code section 87200, et

Page 2 of 4 ends

531
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
filing of an annual Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) (Government Code section 87200, et seq.), requires the City to adopt a conflict of interest code (Government Code section 87300, et seq.), and post-employment lobbying (Government Code section 87406.3, covering only elected officials and agency manager). Other statutory provisions regulate participation in decisions affecting campaign donors (Government Code section 84308), prohibition on honoraria (Government Code section 89501, et seq.) and restrictions on gifts (Government Code section 89503). Use of public funds for improper purposes is precluded by Penal Code section 424 and Government Code section 8314. The California Code of Regulations includes many regulations which explain and implement the Political Reform Act. 2 Cal. Code Reg. § 18700, et seq. Both Attorney General Opinions and FPPC decisions provide interpretation and application of the regulations as guidance. In addition, the Costa Mesa Municipal Code contains restrictions on participating in decisions materially affecting financial interests. CMMC § 2-403.

Government Officials are precluded from having a financial interest in a contract made by them or the legislative body of which they are a member, with some exceptions. California Government Code section 1090, et seq. The Ralph M. Brown Act., California Government Code section 54950, et seq., restricts conduct of city business outside of noticed and public meetings, provides for closed sessions and precludes disclosure of confidential information obtained in closed session. Cal. Gov’tCode § 54963. The California Government Code and the Costa Mesa Municipal Code establish a council/manager form of government, in which the City Council makes policy and the policy direction provided by the Council as a body is carried out by the City Manager. Cal. Gov’tCode §§ 34851- 34859; see CMMC § 2-106 (council to deal with administrative matters through City Manager).

Addressing Topics Not Covered by Existing Laws
Civility, respectful communications, relations with commissioners and members of the public, enforcement procedures for non-statutory violations and distribution of a code of conduct are not covered specifically by these various laws. Post-employment advocacy restrictions under existing law apply only to council members and the City Manager. One potential benefit of adopting a Code of Conduct is the collection in a single document of many of the laws and best practices in local government.

The revised draft policy is provided as Attachment 2. Attachment 3 is a blacklined comparison of the draft considered in February to the current draft. Attachment 4 is the current draft policy, which is highlighted to delineate provisions which are reflective of state or federal law.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may adopt the code with changes, not adopt the code or provide alternative direction to staff on the Code of Ethics and Conduct.

FISCAL REVIEW:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office prepared the revised draft Code of Conduct and this report.

Page 3 of 4 ends

532
File #: 26-227 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item is administrative.

CONCLUSION:

The purpose of this item is to consider approval of a Code of Ethics and Conduct.

Page 4 of 4 ends

533
ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF COSTA MESA

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR

ELECTED AND APPOINTED

OFFICIALS

Adopted
534
- 2 -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 A. ETHICS ....................................................................................................................... 5 B. CONDUCT ................................................................................................................... 8

1. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with Each Other .................................... 8

2. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with City Staff........................................ 9

3. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with the Public .................................... 10

4. Council Conduct with Commission, Committee, or Board Members .................... 11 C. IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................... 11 D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................... 12 535
- 3 -
Introduction

The City of Costa Mesa is a general law city governed by the council/manager form of government. The City Council, with the assistance of its advisory commissions, committees, and boards, makes policies and fundamental governmental decisions; the City Manager is charged with implementing those policies and decisions and administering the day-to-day affairs of the City with the assistance of his/her staff. The City Council has direct authority over the City Manager and the City Attorney; all other employees of the City are under the direct authority of the City Manager.

These standards are adopted to ensure that the Mayor and members of the City Council, as elected representatives, City employees , and appointed Commissioners, are engaged in public service not for private, personal gain, but to advance the interest s of Costa Mesa residents and the entire Costa Mesa community. These standards govern the following Public Officials and City employees: the Mayor; the Mayor Pro Tem; members of the City Council; City Council Executive Assistan ts; the City Manager; Assistant and Deputy City Managers; the City Clerk; Department Directors; Deputy Department Directors; the Police Chief; the Deputy Police Chief; the Fire Chief and Assistant Fire Chiefs; the City Attorney; the Zoning Administrator; the City Engineer; and members of the Planning Commission, the Arts Commission, the Parks and Community Services Commission; and any other commission that is advisory in nature. These positions shall be referred to herein collectively as “the Covered Positions.” The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to responsible, transparent, fair, and honest city government that operates in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

Accordingly, the Costa Mesa City Council has adopted this code to:

1. Describe the standards of behavior to which its Elected (hereinafter the term "Elected" refers to the Mayor and City Council) and Appointed (hereinafter the term "Appointed" refers to members of City of Costa Mesa's Commissions, Committees, and Boards, the City Manager and the City Attorney) Officials and high-ranking employees aspire;

2. Provide an ongoing source of guidance to Elected and Appointed Officials and employees in their day-to-day service to the city; and

3. Promote and maintain high ethical standards.

The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government, which has earned the public's full confidence for integrity. In keeping with the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning of democratic government therefore requires that:
• Elected and Appointed officials comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; • Elected and Appointed officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions;
• Public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain; and • Public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

This Code addresses selective aspects of the governance of the City and supplements but does not supplant other laws and rules that prescribe the legal responsibilities of the C overed Positions . Those include, among others, the California Constitution, various provisions of the California Government Code 536
- 4 -
(including the Brown Act and the Political Reform Act) and the California Labor Code, federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and the provisions of the City's own Municipal Code. Elected and Appointed officials and employees should be familiar with these laws to ensure that they exercise their responsibilities properly.

It is not possible for a code of this kind to anticipate and provide a rule of conduct for all situations. At bottom, it is expected that Elected and Appointed officials and employees in the Covered Positions will manage their behavior in a manner consistent with the rules that follow, respect the chain of command and behave within the bounds of their authority. It is also expected that Elected and Appointed officials will treat each other, City employees, residents and business people with courtesy and respect in a manner that reflects well on the City.

To this end, the Costa Mesa City Council adopts this Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials and designated employees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective and fair operation.
537
- 5 -
A. ETHICS

The Ethics section of the City's Code of Conduct offers guidance on matters pertaining to ethical considerations, addressing questions of right and wrong.

1. Act in the Public Interest. Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, Elected and Appointed officials should work for the common good of the people of Costa Mesa and not for any private or personal interest, and provide for the fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before them. Elected and Appointed officials will serve the community as servant leaders, putting aside self -interest and consider the needs of all residents. Elected and Appointed officials should seek to implement transparency and ethical practices, so as to ensure the public's trust and avoid any perception of wrongdoing.

2. Comply with both the spirit and the letter of the Law and City Policy. Elected and Appointed officials shall comply with the laws of the nation, the State of California and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties.

3. Conduct of Elected and Appointed officials. The professional and personal conduct of Elected and Appointed officials while exercising their office should be above reproach and seek to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Elected and Appointed officials should refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other Elected and Appointed officials of the City Council, of other commissions, committees, or boards of the City, of staff or the public.

4. Conduct at Public Meetings. Elected and Appointed officials should prepare themselves for public issues, listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand.

5. Decisions Based on Merit. Elected and Appointed officials should base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

6. Conflicts of Interest.

a. Elected and Appointed officials should seek to ensure their independence and impartiality on behalf of the common good, and their compliance with conflict-of-interest laws. Unless specifically authorized by law, Elected and Appointed officials should not use their official positions to influence government decisions in which they have (a) a material financial interest, (b) a contractual interest, or (c) an impermissible personal bias (a completely closed mind).

b. Elected and Appointed officials who have a potential conflict of interest regarding a particular decision shall disclose the matter to the City Attorney to analyze the potential conflict. If advised by the City Attorney to seek advice from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) or other appropriate state agency, an Elected or Appointed official should not participate in a decision unless a nd until he or she has requested and receives advice allowing the Elected or Appointed official to participate. An Elected or Appointed official shall diligently pursue obtaining such advice. The Elected or Appointed official shall provide the Mayor and the City Attorney a copy of any of any written request or advice and conform his or her participation to the advice given. In providing assistance to Elected and Appointed officials, the City Attorney represents the city and not individual Elected or Appointed officials.

538
- 6 -

c. Each year Elected and Appointed officials shall file a Form 700, which requires the disclosure of designated investments, interests in real property, sources of income and gifts in accordance with the City's conflict of interest code. Where a conflict is determined to exist, the Elected or Appointed official should disclose the conflict, leave the dais during the consideration of the item, and not otherwise seek to influence the decision in any way.

d. Except as provided in California Government Code Section 1090, et seq., no Elected or Appointed official shall have a financial interest in any contract made by the City.

7. City Allegiance and Proper Conduct.

a. Incompatible Employment or Service. Because of their uniquely important, visible, and elevated status and responsibilities as elected officials, the Mayor and members of the City Council, and by extension their Executive Assistants and their appointed Commissioners, shall not engage in comp ensated employment or service for the purpose of lobbying for any private person or organization before any local public agency (county, city or special district) located in the County of Orange or the County of Los Angeles.

1. Paragraph 7a shall not be applicable to lobbying as an in-house employee on behalf of his or her employer (as opposed to a client of the employer).

2. For purposes of paragraph 7a , “lobbying” shall mean any oral or written communication (including an electronic communication) to an official of a local agency other than the City, made directly or indirectly, in an effort to influence or persuade the official to favor or oppose, recommend or not recommend, vote for or against, or take or refrain from taking action on any public policy issue of a discretionary nature pending before the official’s agency, including, but not limited to, proposed action, or proposals for action, in the form of ordinances, resolutions, motions, recommendations, reports, regulations, policies, nominations, appointments, sanctions, and bids, including the adoption of specifications, awards, grants, or contracts.

b. Interest in City contracts . Individuals in Covered Positions shall not have a personal investment or monetary interest in any contract made by the City, except contracts relating to the performance of their official City duties.

c. Knowledge of and agreement to abide by provisions . Individuals in Covered Positions shall at the time of their election or appointment or upon the effective date of this section, whichever occurs later, sign an appropriate form prepared by the City Clerk reciting their knowledge of the provisions of this code of conduct and their agreement to abide by such provisions.

8. Gifts and Favors. Individuals in Covered Positions shall fully comply with the regulations, prohibitions and disclosure requirements set forth under law concerning the receipt of gifts, honorariums, and any other special favors.

Individuals in Covered Positions should refrain from accepting any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits where it might compromise their ability to act in the public's interest.

9. Confidential Information. Elected and Appointed officials must maintain the confidentiality of all closed session information and materials, and any other materials or verbal information which has been identified as being confidential 539
- 7 -
or privileged. Elected and Appointed officials shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial or other private interests.

10. Use of Public Resources. Elected and Appointed officials shall not use public resources for any personal purpose (e.g., City staff time, equipment, vehicles, supplies or facilities), whether political or otherwise. The use of public resources must always be tied to a valid public purpose.

11. Representation of Private Interests.

a. In keeping with their role as stewards of the public interest, while in office, members of the City Council shall not appear on behalf of the private interests of third parties before the City Council or any other subservient body of the City.

b. For a period of one year after leaving office, members of the City Council are prohibited from making any formal or informal appearances before the City, on behalf of third parties, in exchange for compensation, when it is for the purpose of trying to influence a legislative or administrative action involving a permit, license, grant, contract, or the purchase or sale of goods or property, except in their official role on behalf of another public agency . California Government Code section 87406.3.

12. Advocacy. Elected and Appointed officials should seek to represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, or of their respective commission, committee, or board, to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for that purpose. Whenever an Elected or Appointed official chooses to express their individual opinions on a matter, they should make it clear when those comments do not represent the position of the body of which they are a member or the City of Costa Mesa. Elected and Appointed officials have the right to endorse candidates for all Council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to mention or display endorsements during Council meetings, or commission, committee, or board meetings, or other official City meetings.

13. Policy Role of Elected and Appointed officials. Elected and Appointed officials shall respect and adhere to the Council -Manager structure of the City of Costa Mesa government as outlined in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. In this structure, the City Council determines the policies of the City with the advice, information and analysis provided by City staff, commissions, committees, and boards and the public. Except as provided by the City Code, Elected and Appointed officials shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or the professional duties of staff; nor shall they impair the ability to implement Council policy decisions.

14. Positive Workplace Environment. Elected and Appointed officials shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for City employees and for citizens and businesses dealing with the City. Elected and Appointed officials shall recognize their special role in dealings with City employees to in no way create the perception of inappropriate direction to staff.

15. Ethics Training: Elected and Appointed officials must comply with the ethics training requirement outlined under Assembly Bill 1234 (California Government Code section 53235).

540
- 8 -
B. CONDUCT

The conduct section of the City's Code of Conduct aims to articulate the expected treatment of Elected and Appointed officials towards one another, City staff, constituents, and other individuals encountered while representing the City of Costa Mesa. "Respect" serves as a pervasive and unwavering theme throughout all the conduct guidelines. Elected and Appointed officials are tasked with upholding exemplary behavior consistently. The key principle underlying these guidelines is the demonstration of respect for each individual, employing both words and actions. This emphasis on respect serves as a guiding principle, assisting Elected and Appointed officials in making the right choices, even in the most challenging situations.

1. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with Each Other Elected and Appointed officials are individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve in public office in order to preserve and protect the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even though individuals may not agree on every issue.
a. Honor the role of the Mayor or Chairperson in maintaining order It is the responsibility of the Mayor or Chairperson to keep the comments of Elected and Appointed officials on track during public meetings. Elected and Appointed officials should honor efforts by the Mayor or Chairperson to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement concerning any matter, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following the adopted parliamentary guidelines.
b. Practice civility and decorum in discussions and debate Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information, are legitimate elements of debate by a free democracy in action. However, free debate does not require nor justify the making of belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. Elected and Appointed officials should endeavor to keep each other accountable for professional decorum. Do not interrupt or speak over others, striving to understand various perspectives and opinions while encouraging cooperation and collaboration.
c. Demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches
Elected and Appointed officials have a public stage and have the responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole. 541
- 9 -

2. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with City Staff Governance of a City relies on the cooperative efforts of elected officials, who set policy, appointed officials who advise the elected officials, and City staff who implement and administer the Council's policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community.
a. Treat all staff as professionals
Clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each individual is expected. Poor behavior towards staff is not acceptable.
b. Govern, do not direct
The Mayor and Council Members' role is to set policy and not to provide day to day direction to City employees. Questions of City staff and/or requests for additional information shall be directed to the City Manager, unless the City Manager indicates otherwise.
c. Do not disrupt City staff from their jobs
Elected and Appointed officials should not disrupt City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in performing their job functions in order to have their individual needs met. Elected and Appointed officials should not attend City staff meetings, unless requested by staff.
d. Personnel Matters
Personnel matters must be handled by the C ity Manager and H uman Resources division, working together with the employee and department at issue. Elected and Appointed officials should not get involved in personnel matters, whether to encourage or discourage a particular outcome, or to help investigate a concern. Elected and Appointed officials involvement tends to increase litigation against the City, so it should be avoided. All concerns should be directed to the City Manager, who has the responsibility to investigate and make final decisions in accordance with California law and the City's rules.

e. Never publicly criticize an individual employee
Elected and Appointed officials should never express concerns about the performance of a city employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager. Concerns about staff performance should only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation. Such concerns can then be addressed in accordance with the City's personnel rules. f. Do not retaliate or threaten to retaliate against employees as a result of disagreements over policy recommendations
It is critical to the success of the City that its employees enjoy a workplace free of the fear of retaliation. The C ity takes great pride in its creativity and its receptivity to new and different ideas; creativity is fostered by an open and nonjudgmental atmosphere where candor is not penalized. City employees are hired to offer t heir professional judgments and opinions. Elected and Appointed officials are certainly free to disagree with those judgments; indeed, those officials ultimately may have the final word. But those disagreements must not extend to threats or generate fear of reprisal. Elected and Appointed officials enjoy substantial authority within City Hall; this authority must not be exercised in a manner that intimidates staff and degrades morale with resulting damage to the fabric of the organization.

g. Do not get involved in administrative functions
542
- 10 -
Elected and Appointed officials acting in their individual capacity should not attempt to influence City staff on the making of appointments, awarding of contracts, selecting of consultants, processing of development applications, or granting of City licenses and permits.
h. Do not solicit political support from staff
Elected and Appointed officials should not solicit any type of political support (financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, other campaign-related assistance, etc.) from City staff while they are working.

City staff have the constitutional right to support political candidates of their own choosing, but all such activities must be done on the employee's own time, away from the workplace, and not in uniform.
i. No Attorney-Client Relationship
The City Attorney represents the city and not any individual Elected or Appointed official.

3. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with the Public Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process.

No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individuals in Covered Positions toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony.
a. Be welcoming to speakers and treat them with respect While questions of clarification may be asked, the official's primary role during public testimony is to listen.
b. Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers The Mayor or Chairperson will follow the pre-established time allocation for each speaker and seek to apply them equally to every speaker in a fair and impartial manner. If there is a need to shorten the allotted time for speakers, the chair should announce those limits prior to the start of the agenda item whenever possible. Each speaker may only speak once during any particular agenda item unless the Mayor or Chairperson requests additional clarification later in the process. After the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless the Mayor or Chairperson reopens the public hearing for a limited and specific purpose.
c. Practice active listening
Elected and Appointed officials should seek to demonstrate active listening and interest in each speaker's presentation, and to avoid any pessimistic body language.
d. Maintain an open mind
Members of the public deserve an opportunity to influence the thinking of Elected and Appointed officials.
e. Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public Elected and Appointed officials should not interrupt a speaker during a presentation. However, an Elected or Appointed officials can respectfully ask the Mayor or Chairperson for a point of order if a speaker is off the topic. 543
- 11 -

4. Council Conduct with Other Commission, Committee, or Board Members

The City Council has established certain commissions, committees, and boards as a means to assist the Council in making decisions, and in gathering more community input. Citizens who serve as members of the City's various commissions, committees, and boards, become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council. They are a valuable resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. a. If attending a Commission, Committee, or Board meeting, be careful to only express personal opinions
Council Members may attend any commission, committee, or board meeting, which are always open to any member of the public. However, they should be sensitive to the way their participation could be viewed as unfairly affecting the process.
b. Limit contact with Commission, Committee, and Board members to questions of clarification
It is acceptable for Council Members to contact commission, committee, or board members. However, it would be inappropriate to lobby one of these members on behalf of an individual, business, or developer, and vice versa. c. Be respectful of diverse opinions
A primary role of commission, committee, and board members is to represent the many points of view in the community, and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives. Council Members may have a closer working relationship with some individual members, but they should be fair and respectful of every citizen who chooses to serve as a member of one of the City's commissions, committees, or boards.

d. Keep political support away from public fora
Commission, committee, and board members have the right to offer their political support to a Council Member in their private capacity, but not while conducting official City duties. Likewise, Council Members may support any commission, committee, or board member who may be running for office, but such support should not be expressed during the course of any City funded meeting.

C. IMPLEMENTATION

1. The Costa Mesa Code of Conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for the Mayor, Costa Mesa City Council, members of commissions, committees, boards, and all Covered Positions. In addition, all Elected and Appointed officials and designat ed employees shall be required to take all training mandated by law, including AB 1234 training and AB 1661 training.

2. The provisions of this Code of Conduct express standards of ethical conduct expected for City officials and employees. As an expression of such standards, the provisions of this Code are intended to be self -enforcing for the most part.

City officials and employees themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. It will be most effective when City officials and employees are thoroughly familiar with the expressed standards and embrace them.

544
- 12 -

3. F ollowing its adoption, the City Clerk shall provide all current Elected and Appointed Officials with a copy of the newly adopted Code of Conduct and all current Elected and Appointed Officials will be asked to sign a statement acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to candidates for Mayor, City Council, and applicants to Commissions, Committee, and Boards. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to all Elected and Appointed Officials upon entering office and all individuals in Covered Positions will be asked to sign a statement (example below) acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct.

Example:

D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
Elected and Appointed officials themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. The chairs of commissions, commit Stees and boards and the Mayor have the additional responsibility to intervene when Elected and Appointed officials' actions appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when these actions are brought to their attention.

1. A violation of the provisions of this Code of Conduct shall not be considered and shall not constitute a basis for challenging the validity of any decision by the City Council or any other body or agency of the City.

2. All suspected violations of this Code that also pertain to provisions of the Political Reform Act (California Government Code section 81000, et seq.) should be reported to the Fair Political Practices Commission of the State of California.

3. All suspected violations of this Code that may independently constitute criminal offenses, including those outside of the purview of the Fair Political Practices Commission, should be reported to the Office of the Orange County District Attorney.

4. Except as otherwise expressly provided by State law, the following shall constitute the exclusive means and procedures of enforcing the provisions of this Code:
a. Alleged vio lations committed by the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a member of a City commission should be reported in writing to the City Attorney. Upon receipt of the report, the City Attorney shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation and endeavoring to avoid future violations in the event one has occurred.

I affirm that I have read and understand the City of Costa Mesa Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials, and covered City Employees.

Name: __________________________ Position: _____________________

Signature: Date: __________________

545
- 13 -
b. Alleged violations committed by som eone in a Covered Position should be reported in writing to the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon receipt of the report, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall commence an investigation to determine whether the alleged violation is substantiated. The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation. In the event the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines that a violation has occurred, the City Manager may take appropriate action in accordance with applicable City r ules, regulations, and procedures related to employment and/or discipline.
c. In the event that the City Attorney or City Manager (or his or her designee) determines that a violation of this division has occurred, appropriate documentation should be prepared to memorialize the determination.

5. The City Council may impose sanctions on members of commissions, committees, and boards whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. In addition, the City Council may also act to remove members of commissions, committees and boards from office or position who violate the provisions of this Code.

6. The City Council may impose sanctions on Elected officials whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. Serious violations could lead to additional sanctions as deemed appropriate by the City Council.

The definition of a "serious violation" is not set forth by law, but in determining the type of sanction to be considered or imposed, the following factors may be considered:
a. Nature of the violation (conflict of interest, financial disclosures, actions of harassment, abusive conduct, open process of Government, Brown Act, City ordinances and policies, failure to disclose campaign contributions when voting on an item to award an agreement/contract, etc.)

b. Prior violations by the same individual
c. Other factors which bear upon the seriousness of the violation (failure to comply with the laws of the United States of America, State of California, and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties, etc.) 546
Attachment 2

City of Costa Mesa

Code of Conduct For
Elected and Appointed Officials

Adopted by Resolution No.
2026-XX
547
- 2 -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 A. ETHICS ....................................................................................................................... 5 B. CONDUCT ................................................................................................................... 8

1. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with Each Other .................................... 8

2. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with City Staff........................................ 9

3. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with the Public .................................... 10

4. Council Conduct with Commission or Committee Members ................................. 11 C. IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................... 11 D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................... 12 548
- 3 -
Introduction

The City of Costa Mesa is a general law city governed by the council/manager form of government. The City Council, with the assistance of its advisory commissions and committees, makes policies and fundamental governmental decisions; the City Manager is charged with implementing those policies and decisions and administering the day-to-day affairs of the City with the assistance of his/her staff. The City Council has direct authority over the City Manager and the City Attorney; all other employees of the City are under the direct authority of the City Manager.

These standards are adopted to ensure that the Mayor and members of the City Council, as elected representatives, City employees, and appointed Commissioners, are engaged in public service not for private, personal gain, but to advance the interest of Costa Mesa residents and the entire Costa Mesa community. These standards govern the following Public Officials and City employees: the Mayor; the Mayor Pro Tem; members of the City Council; the City Manager; Assistant and Deputy City Managers; the City Clerk; Department Directors; Deputy Department Directors; the Police Chief; the Deputy Police Chief; the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chiefs; the City Attorney; the Zoning Administrator; the City Engineer; and members of the Planning Commission, the Arts Commission, the Parks and Community Services Commission; and any other committee that is advisory in nature. These positions shall be referred to herein collectively as “the Covered Positions.”
The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to responsible, transparent, fair, and honest city government that operates in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

Accordingly, the Costa Mesa City Council has adopted this code to:

1. Describe the standards of behavior to which its Elected (hereinafter the term "Elected" refers to the Mayor and City Council) and Appointed (hereinafter the term "Appointed" refers to members of City of Costa Mesa's Commissions and Committees, the City Manager and the City Attorney) Officials and high ranking employees aspire;

2. Provide an ongoing source of guidance to Elected and Appointed Officials and employees in their day-to-day service to the city; and

3. Promote and maintain high ethical standards.

The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government, which has earned the public's full confidence for integrity. In keeping with the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning of democratic government therefore requires that:
• Elected and Appointed officials comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; • Elected and Appointed officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions;
• public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain; and • public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

This Code addresses selective aspects of the governance of the City and supplements but does not supplant other laws and rules that prescribe the legal responsibilities of the Covered Positions. Those include, among others, the California Constitution, various provisions of the California Government Code 549
- 4 -
(including the Brown Act and the Political Reform Act) and the California Labor Code, federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and the provisions of the City's own Municipal Code. Elected and Appointed officials and covered employees should be familiar with these laws to ensure that they exercise their responsibilities properly.

It is not possible for a code of this kind to anticipate and provide a rule of conduct for all situations. It is expected that Elected and Appointed officials and employees in the Covered Positions will manage their behavior in a manner consistent with the rules that follow, respect the chain of command and behave within the bounds of their authority. It is also expected that Elected and Appointed officials will treat each other, City employees, residents and business people with courtesy and respect in a manner that reflects well on the City.

To this end, the Costa Mesa City Council adopts this Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials and designated employees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective and fair operation.
550
- 5 -
A. ETHICS

The Ethics section of the City's Code of Conduct offers guidance on matters pertaining to ethical considerations, addressing questions of right and wrong.

1. Act in the Public Interest. Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, officials in the Covered Positions (“Officials”) should work for the common good of the people of Costa Mesa and not for any private or personal interest, and provide for the fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before them. Officials will serve the community as servant leaders, putting aside self-interest and consider the needs of all residents. Officials should seek to implement transparency and ethical practices, so as to ensure the public's trust and avoid any perception of wrongdoing.

2. Comply with both the spirit and the letter of the Law and City Policy. Officials shall comply with the laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties.

3. Conduct of Officials in Covered Positions. The professional and personal conduct of Officials while exercising their office should be above reproach and seek to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Officials should refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other Officials of the City Council, of other commissions or committees of the City, of staff or the public.

4. Conduct at Public Meetings. Officials should prepare themselves for public issues, listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand. Officials should limit their use of electronic devices during meetings.

5. Decisions Based on Merit. Officials should base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

6. Conflicts of Interest.

a. Officials should seek to ensure their independence and impartiality on behalf of the common good, and their compliance with conflict-of-interest laws. Unless specifically authorized by law, Officials should not use their official positions to influence government decisions in which they have (a) a material financial interest, (b) a contractual interest, or (c) an impermissible personal bias (a completely closed mind).

b. Officials who have a potential conflict of interest regarding a particular decision shall disclose the matter to the City Attorney to analyze the potential conflict. If advised by the City Attorney to seek advice from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) or other appropriate state agency, an Official should not participate in a decision unless and until he or she has requested and receives advice allowing the Official to participate. An Official shall diligently pursue obtaining such advice. The Official shall provide the Mayor and the City Attorney a copy of any written request or advice and conform his or her participation to the advice given. In providing assistance to Officials, the City Attorney represents the city and not individual Officials.

c. Each year Officials in the Covered Position shall file a Form 700, which requires the disclosure of designated investments, interests in real property, sources of income and gifts in accordance with the City's conflict of interest code. Where a conflict exists, the Official must disclose the conflict, leave the 551
- 6 -
dais during the consideration of the item, and not otherwise seek to influence the decision in any way.

d. Except as provided in California Government Code section 1090, et seq., no Official shall have a financial interest in any contract made by the City, except contracts relating to the performance of their official City duties.

7. City Allegiance and Proper Conduct.

a. Any person in a Covered Position who is employed by another governmental entity or a non-profit, or has an interest in their spouse’s employment with a governmental entity or a non-profit shall disclose such employment or interest in a spouse’s employment at the time such employment or interest commences, and again any time that official’s or spouse’s employer is involved in any City Council action or proposed action, even if such employment or interest in a spouse’s employment does not prohibit participation by the affected Official under state or local law.

b. Political Influence Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person in a Covered Position to use or promise to use his influence or official authority to secure any appointment or prospective appointment, to any position in the service of the City as a reward or return for personal or partisan political service.

c. Knowledge of and agreement to abide by provisions. Individuals in Covered Positions shall at the time of their election or appointment or upon the effective date of this section, whichever occurs later, sign an appropriate form prepared by the City Clerk reciting their knowledge of the provisions of this code of conduct and their agreement to abide by such provisions.

8. Gifts and Favors. Individuals in Covered Positions shall fully comply with the regulations, prohibitions and disclosure requirements set forth under law concerning the receipt of gifts, honorariums, and any other special favors.

Individuals in Covered Positions should refrain from accepting any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits where it might compromise their ability to act in the public's interest.

9. Confidential Information. Officials must maintain the confidentiality of all closed session information and materials, and any other materials or verbal information which has been identified as being confidential or privileged.

Officials shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial or other private interests.

10. Use of Public Resources. Officials shall not use public resources for any personal purpose (e.g., City staff time, equipment, vehicles, supplies or facilities), whether political or otherwise. The use of public resources must always be tied to a valid public purpose.

11. Representation of Private Interests.

a. In keeping with their role as stewards of the public interest, while in office, members of the City Council shall not appear on behalf of the private interests of third parties before the City Council or any other subservient 552
- 7 -
body of the City.

b. For a period of one year after leaving office, members of the City Council are prohibited from making any formal or informal appearances before the City, on behalf of third parties, in exchange for compensation, when it is for the purpose of trying to influence a legislative or administrative action involving a permit, license, grant, contract, or the purchase or sale of goods or property, except in their official role on behalf of another public agency. California Government Code section 87406.3.

12. Advocacy. Officials should seek to represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, or of their respective commission or committee, to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for that purpose. Whenever an Official chooses to express their individual opinions on a matter, they should make it clear when those comments do not represent the position of the body of which they are a member or the City of Costa Mesa. Individual officials have the right to endorse candidates for all Council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to mention or display endorsements during Council meetings, or commission or committee meetings, or other official City meetings.

13. Policy Role of Elected and Appointed officials. Officials shall respect and adhere to the Council-Manager structure of the City of Costa Mesa government as outlined in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. In this structure, the City Council determines the policies of the City with the advice, information and analysis provided by City staff, commissions and committees and the public. Except as provided by the City Code, Elected and Appointed officials shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or the professional duties of staff; nor shall they impair the ability to implement Council policy decisions.

14. Positive Workplace Environment. Officials shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for City employees and for citizens and businesses dealing with the City. Officials shall recognize their special role in dealings with City employees to in no way create the perception of inappropriate direction to staff.

15. Ethics Training: Officials must comply with the ethics training requirement outlined under Assembly Bill 1234 (California Government Code section 53235).

16. Nepotism: The City Council shall not appoint to a salaried position under the City government any person who is a relative by blood or marriage within the second degree of any one or more of the members of such Council and neither shall any department head or other officer having appointive power appoint any relative within such degree to any such position.

553
- 8 -

B. CONDUCT

The conduct section of the City's Code of Conduct aims to articulate the expected treatment of Officials towards one another, City staff, constituents, and other individuals encountered while representing the City of Costa Mesa. "Respect" serves as a pervasive and unwavering theme throughout all the conduct guidelines.

Elected and Appointed officials are tasked with upholding exemplary behavior consistently. The key principle underlying these guidelines is the demonstration of respect for each individual, employing both words and actions. This emphasis on respect serves as a guiding principle, assisting Officials in making the right choices, even in the most challenging situations.

1. Officials' Conduct with Each Other
Officials are individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve in public office in order to preserve and protect the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even though individuals may not agree on every issue.
a. Honor the role of the Mayor or Chairperson in maintaining order.

It is the responsibility of the Mayor or Chairperson to keep the comments of Officials on track during public meetings. Officials should honor efforts by the Mayor or Chairperson to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement concerning any matter, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following the adopted parliamentary guidelines.

b. Practice civility and decorum in discussions and debate.

Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information, are legitimate elements of debate by a free democracy in action. However, free debate does not require nor justify the making of belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. Officials should endeavor to keep each other accountable for professional decorum. Do not interrupt or speak over others, striving to understand various perspectives and opinions while encouraging cooperation and collaboration.

c. Demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches.

Officials have a public stage and have the responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole.

2. Officials' Conduct with City Staff
Governance of a City relies on the cooperative efforts of elected officials, who set policy, appointed officials who advise the elected officials, and City staff who implement and administer the Council's policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community.

a. Treat all staff as professionals.

Clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each individual is expected. Poor behavior towards staff is not acceptable.
b. Govern, do not direct
The Mayor and Council Members' role is to set policy and not to provide day 554
- 9 -
to day direction to city employees. Questions of City staff and/or requests for additional information shall be directed to the City Manager or the appropriate Department Head, unless the City Manager or Department Head indicates otherwise. Council Members may pass on constituent concerns directly to staff designated by the City Manager or Department Head for such purposes.
c. Do not disrupt City staff from their jobs.

Officials should not disrupt City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in performing their job functions in order to have their individual needs met. Elected and Appointed officials should not attend City staff meetings, unless requested by staff.
d. Personnel Matters
Personnel matters must be handled by the City Manager and Human Resources division, working together with the employee and department at issue, and if necessary, the City Attorney. Other Officials should not get involved in personnel matters, whether to encourage or discourage a particular outcome, or to help investigate a concern. Officials’ inappropriate involvement tends to increase litigation against the City, so it should be avoided. All concerns should be directed to the City Manager, who has the responsibility to investigate and make final decisions in accordance with California law and the City's rules.
e. Never publicly criticize an individual employee.

Officials should never express concerns about the performance of a city employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager.

Concerns about staff performance should only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation. Such concerns can then be addressed in accordance with the City's personnel rules. f. Do not retaliate or threaten to retaliate against employees as a result of disagreements over policy recommendations.

It is critical to the success of the City that its employees enjoy a workplace free of the fear of retaliation. The City takes great pride in its creativity and its receptivity to new and different ideas; creativity is fostered by an open and nonjudgmental atmosphere where candor is not penalized. City employees are hired to offer their professional judgments and opinions. Elected and Appointed officials are certainly free to disagree with those judgments; indeed, those Officials ultimately may have the final word. But those disagreements must not extend to threats or generate fear of reprisal.

Elected and Appointed officials enjoy substantial authority within City Hall; this authority must not be exercised in a manner that intimidates staff and degrades morale with resulting damage to the fabric of the organization. g. No disciplinary action or retaliation shall be taken against any employee for reporting in good faith a perceived issue, problem, concern or violation. Additionally, no reprisal shall be taken against any officer or employee who participates as a witness during the course of an investigation.
h. Do not get involved in administrative functions.

Officials acting in their individual capacity should not attempt to influence City staff on the making of appointments, awarding of contracts, selecting of consultants, processing of development applications, or granting of City licenses and permits.
i. Do not solicit political support from staff.

Elected and Appointed officials should not solicit any type of political support 555
- 10 -
(financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, other campaign-related assistance, etc.) from City staff while they are working. City staff have the constitutional right to support political candidates of their own choosing, but all such activities must be done on the employee's own time, away from the workplace, and not in uniform.
j. No Attorney-Client Relationship
The City Attorney represents the city and not any individual Elected or Appointed official.

3. Officials' Conduct with the Public
Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process.

No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individuals in Covered Positions toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony.
a. Be welcoming to speakers and treat them with respect.

While questions of clarification may be asked, the Official's primary role during public testimony is to listen. Officials should seek to demonstrate active listening and interest in each speaker's presentation, and to avoid any negative body language. This includes refraining from use of personal electronic devices during meetings to engage in work, or to communicate with members of the public or other decision making officials about an item on the agenda.
b. Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers.

The Mayor or Chairperson will follow the pre-established time allocation for each speaker and seek to apply them equally to every speaker in a fair and impartial manner. If there is a need to shorten the allotted time for speakers, the chair should announce those limits prior to the start of the agenda item whenever possible. Each speaker may only speak once during any particular agenda item unless the Mayor or Chairperson requests additional clarification later in the process. After the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless the Mayor or Chairperson reopens the public hearing for a limited and specific purpose.

c. No official or employee shall encourage, make or accept any ex parte or other unilateral application or communication that excludes the interests of other parties in a matter under consideration when such application or communication is designed to influence the official decision or conduct of the official or other officials, employees or agencies in order to obtain a more favored treatment or special consideration to advance the personal or private interests of him/herself or others. The purpose of this provision is to guarantee that all interested parties to any matter shall have equal opportunity to express and represent their interests. Any written ex parte communication received by an official or employee in matters where all interested parties should have an equal opportunity for a hearing shall be made a part of the record by the recipient. Any oral ex parte communication received under such conditions should be written down in substance by the recipient and also be made a part of the record.
d. Maintain an open mind.

Members of the public deserve an opportunity to influence the thinking of Officials.

556
- 11 -
e. Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public.

Officials should not interrupt a speaker during a presentation. However, an Elected or Appointed official can respectfully ask the Mayor or Chairperson for a point of order if a speaker is off the topic, or to ask a question of the speaker.

f. Be accessible to the public between noticed City meetings to assist them and connect them with staff who can respond to their questions and concerns.

4. Council Conduct with Other Commission or Committee Members

The City Council has established certain commissions and committees as a means to assist the Council in making decisions, and in gathering more community input. Citizens who serve as members of the City's various commissions and committees become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council. They are a valuable resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. a. If attending a Commission or Committee meeting, be careful to only express personal opinions.

Council Members may attend any commission or committee meeting, which are always open to any member of the public. However, they should be sensitive to the way their participation could be viewed as unfairly affecting the process.
b. Limit contact with Commission and Committee members to questions of clarification.

It is acceptable for Council Members to contact commission or committee members. However, it would be inappropriate to lobby one of these members on behalf of an individual, business, or developer, and vice versa. c. Be respectful of diverse opinions.

A primary role of commission and committee members is to represent the many points of view in the community, and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives. Council Members may have a closer working relationship with some individual members, but they should be fair and respectful of every citizen who chooses to serve as a member of one of the City's commissions or committees.

d. Keep political support away from public fora.

Commission and committee members have the right to offer their political support to a Council Member in their private capacity, but not while conducting official City duties. Likewise, Council Members may support any commission or committee member who may be running for office, but such support should not be expressed during the course of any City funded meeting.

557
- 12 -

C. IMPLEMENTATION

1. The Costa Mesa Code of Conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for the Mayor, Costa Mesa City Council, members of commissions and committees, and all Covered Positions. In addition, all Officials and designated employees shall be required to take all training mandated by law, including AB 1234 training and AB 1661 training.

2. The provisions of this Code of Conduct express standards of ethical conduct expected for City officials and employees. As an expression of such standards, the provisions of this Code are intended to be self-enforcing for the most part. City officials and employees themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. It will be most effective when City officials and employees are thoroughly familiar with the expressed standards and embrace them.

3. Following its adoption, the City Clerk shall provide all current Officials in Covered Positions with a copy of the newly adopted Code of Conduct and all current Officials will be asked to sign a statement acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to candidates for Mayor, City Council, and applicants to Commissions and Committee. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to all Elected and Appointed Officials upon entering office and all individuals in Covered Positions will be asked to sign a statement (example below) acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct.

Example:

I affirm that I have read and understand the City of Costa Mesa Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials, and covered City Employees.

Name: Position:

Signature: Date: _

D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
Officials themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. The chairs of commissions and committees and the Mayor have the additional responsibility to intervene when Elected and Appointed officials' actions appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when these actions are brought to their attention.

1. A violation of the provisions of this Code of Conduct shall not be considered and shall not constitute a basis for challenging the validity of any decision by the City Council or any other body or agency of the City.

2. All suspected violations of this Code that also pertain to provisions of the Political Reform Act (California Government Code section 81000, et seq.) should be reported to the Fair Political Practices Commission of the State of California. 558
- 13 -

3. All suspected violations of this Code that may independently constitute criminal offenses, including those outside of the purview of the Fair Political Practices Commission, should be reported to the Office of the Orange County District Attorney.

4. Except as otherwise expressly provided by State law, the following shall constitute the exclusive means and procedures of enforcing the provisions of this Code:
a. Alleged violations committed by the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a member of a City commission should be reported in writing to the City Attorney.

Upon receipt of the report, the City Attorney shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation and endeavoring to avoid future violations in the event one has occurred.

b. Alleged violations committed by an individual in a Covered Position other than the City Council, Commission members or the City Manager should be reported in writing to the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon receipt of the report, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall commence an investigation to determine whether the alleged violation is substantiated. The City Manager, or his/ her designee, shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation. In the event the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines that a violation has occurred, the City Manager may take appropriate action in accordance with applicable City rules, regulations, and procedures related to employment and/or discipline.

c. In the event that the City Attorney or City Manager (or his or her designee) determines that a violation of this division has occurred, appropriate documentation should be prepared to memorialize the determination.

5. The City Council may impose sanctions on members of commissions and committees whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. In addition, the City Council may also act to remove members of commissions and committees from office or position who violate the provisions of this Code, in accordance with the requirements contained in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

6. The City Council may impose sanctions on Elected officials whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. Serious violations could lead to additional sanctions as deemed appropriate by the City Council.

The definition of a "serious violation" is not set forth by law, but in determining the type of sanction to be considered or imposed, the following factors may be considered:
a. Nature of the violation (conflict of interest, financial disclosures, actions of harassment, abusive conduct, open process of Government, Brown Act, City ordinances and policies, failure to disclose campaign contributions when voting on an item to award an agreement/contract, etc.)

b. Prior violations by the same individual
c. Other factors which bear upon the seriousness of the violation (failure to comply with the laws of the United States of America, State of California, and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties, etc.) 559
Attachment 3
City of Costa Mesa
Code of Conduct For
Elected and Appointed Officials
Adopted by Resolution No.
2026-XX
560
Table of Contents
Table of Contents. .2
Introduction. .3
A.ETHICS. .5
B. CONDUCT . .8

4. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with Each Other.. .8

2. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with City Staff. .9

3. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with the Public. .10

4. CouncilConductwithCommission.orCommittee.epEleapdMembers.................11 C. IMPLEMENTATION .11
D.COMPLIANCE ANDENFORCEMENT. .12
-2-
561
Introduction
The City of Costa Mesa is a general law city governed by the council/manager form of government. The City Council, with the assistance of its advisory commissions.,and committees, makes policies and fundamental governmental decisions the City Manager is charged with implementing those policies and decisions and administering the day-to-day affairs ofthe City with the assistance of his/her staff. The City Council has direct authority over the City Manager and the City Attorney all other employees of the City are under the direct authority of the City Manager.

These standards are adopted to ensure that the Mayor and members of the City Council, as elected representatives, City employees, and appointed Commissioners, are engaged in public service not for private, personal gain, but to advance the interest of Costa Mesa residents and the entire Costa Mesa community. These standards govern the following Public Officials and City employees: the Mayor the Mayor Pro Tem; members of the City Council; G'%- Council Exacutivt:' ,%aiatants; the City Manager; Assistant and Deputy City Managers the City Clerk Department Directors Deputy Department Directors:
the Police Chief the Deputy Police Chief: the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chiefs the City Attorney; the Zoning Administrator; the City Engineer; and members of the Planning Commission, the Arts Commission, the Parks and Community Services Commission and any other committee that is advisory in nature. These positions shall be referred to herein collectively as "the Covered Positions."
The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to responsible, transparent, fair, and honest city government that operates in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

Accordingly, the Costa Mesa City Council has adopted this code to:

1. Describe the standards of behavior to which its Elected (hereinafter the term "Elected" refers to the Mayor and City Council) and Appointed (hereinafter the term "Appointed" refers to members of City of Costa Mesa's Commissions,and Committees, the City Manager and the City Attorney) Officials and high ranking employees aspire;

2. Provide an ongoing source ofguidance to Elected and Appointed Officials and employees in their day-to-day service to the city and

3. Promote and maintain high ethical standards.

The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government, which has earned the public's full confidence for integrity. In keeping with the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning ofdemocratic government therefore requires that:

Elected and Appointed officials comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; Elected and Appointed officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions;
public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain and public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

This Code addresses selective aspects of the governance of the City and supplements but does not supplant other laws and rules that prescribe the legal responsibilities of the Covered Positions. Those include, among others, the -3-
562
California Constitution, various provisions ofthe California Government Code (including the Brown Act and the Political Reform Act) and the California Labor Code, federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and the provisions of the City's own Municipal Code. Elected and Appointed officials and covered employees should be familiar with these laws to ensure that they exercise their responsibilities properly.

It is not possible for a code of this kind to anticipate and provide a rule of conduct for all situations. lt is expected that Elected and Appointed officials and employees in the Covered Positions will manage their behavior in a manner consistent with the rules that follow, respect the chain of command and behave within the bounds of their authority. It is also expected that Elected and Appointed officials will treat each other, City employees, residents and business people with courtesy and respect in a manner that reflects well on the City.

To this end, the Costa Mesa City Council adopts this Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials and designated employees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective and fair operation.
-4-
563
A. ETHICS
The Ethics section ofthe City's Code ofConduct offers guidance on matters pertaining to ethical considerations, addressing questions of right and wrong.

1. Act in the Public Interest. Recognizing that stewardship ofthe publicinterest must be their primary concern, ' officials in the Covered Positions ("Officials") should work for the common good of the people of Costa Mesa and not for any private or personal interest, and provide for the fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before them.

Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials will serve the community as servant leaders, putting aside self-interest and consider the needs of all residents.

Elcctcd and /'ippointcd officialcOfficials should seek to implement transparency and ethical practices, so as to ensure the public's trust and avoid any perception of wrongdoing.

2. Comply with both the spirit and the letter of the Law and City Policy. " ' Officials shall comply with the laws ofthe United States , the State ofCalifornia and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties.

3. Conduct of " ' .Officials in Covered Positions. The professional and personal conduct of Elcck.d and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials while exercising their office should be above reproach and seek to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Elected and /\ppointcd officialcOffici.:its should refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other Elected and Appointed officialcOfficials of the City Council, of other commissions,or committees of the City, of staff or the public.

4. Conduct at Public Meetinqs. Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials should prepare themselves for public issues, listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand. Officials should limit their use of electronic devices durinq meetinqs.

5. Decisions Based on Merit. Elcctcd and Appointed officialr,Officials should base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

6. Conflicts of Interest.
a. Elcctad and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials should seek to ensure their independence and impartiality on behalf ofthe common good, and their compliance with conflict-of-interest laws. Unless specifically authorized by law, Elected and /\ppointcd offici;'ilr,Officials should not use their official positions to influence government decisions in which they have (a) a material financial interest, (b) a contractual interest, or (c) an impermissible personal bias (a completely closed mind).
b. Elcck.d and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials who have a potential conflict of interest regarding a particular decision shall disclose the matter to the City Attorney to analyze the potential conflict. If advised by the City Attorney to seek advice from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) or other appropriate state agency, an " ' Official should not participate in a decision unless and until he or she has requested and receives advice allowing the " ' Official to
participate. An Elected or Appointed officialOfficial shall diligently pursue -5-
564
obtaining such advice. Thc Elected or /\ppointcd officialOfficial shall provide the Mayor and the City Attorney a copy of,apy writteri re,q uest or advice and conform his or her parkicipation to the advice given. In providing assistance to Elected and /\ppointcd officialc, the City Attorney represents the city and not individual Elcctcd or /\ppointcd officialcOfficials. c. Each year Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials in the Covered Position shall file a Form 700, which requires the disclosure of designated investments, interests in real property, sources of income and gifts in accordance with the City's conflict of interest code. Where a conflict is- determined to cxictpxists, thc Elcctcd or /(ppointcd official chouldOfficial must disclose the conflict, leave the dais during the consideration ofthe item, and not otherwise seek to influence the decision in any way.

7.1. City /\lloqia
a. Incompatible Employmcnt or Scrvicc. Bccausc of their uniqucly important, visible, and clcvatcd ctatu; and rcsponcibiliticc as clcctcd officials, the Mayor and mcmbcrs of the City Council, and by cxtcncion their Exccutivc /\t'sictantc and their appointcd Commissioncrs, shall not cngagc in compcncatcd cmploymcnt or service for the purpose of lobbying for any privatc parson or organization bcforc any local public agcncy (county, city or special district) locak.d in thc County of Orange or the County of Loc /\ngclcc. ----f Formatted: Condensed by O.3 pt

1. Paragraph 7a shall not be applicablc to lobbying as an in house cmploytx. on bchalf of his or her employer (as opposcd to a client of the cmploycr).

2. For purpoccc of paragraph 7a, "lobbying" shall mean any oral or writtcn communication (including an clcctronic communication) to an official of a local agency othcr than the City, made directly or indircctly, in an effort to influcncc or pcrsuadc the official to favor or oppocc, rccommcnd or not rccommcnd, votc for or against, or take or refrain from tak.ing action on any public policy issue of a diccrctionary nature pending bcforc the official's agency, including, but not limited to, proposed action, or proposals for action, in the form of ordinanccc, rccolutionc, motions, rccommcndationc, rcportc, rcgulationr:, policies, nominationr;, appointmcnts, sanctions, and bids, including the adoption of spccifications, awards, grants, or contracts.

M. Intcrcst in City contracts. Individuals in Co'.'crcd Positions shall not have a pcrsonal investment or monctary,intqrc:,tin,any,contract,madeJy,tj3e,(,ijy, except contracts relating to the peformance of their official City duties. ileqi3nce and Pro
a. in a Covered Position who is
or has an interest in their
or a shall disclose such
a 's at the time such
and ' time that official's or 's
Council action or ' even if such
's does not ibit '
under state or local law.
another
'S with a
or interest in
or interest
is involved in
or interest in a
the affected Official
o'.,'( Formatted: Character scale: 105o*
" Formatted: Character scale: 105%, Condensed by O.45 pt
Formatted: Character scale: 105%
-6-
565
b. Political Influence Prohibited. It is unlawful for in a Covered Position to use or ' to use his influence or official ' to secure or to " in the service of the
Cit as a reward or return for ersonal or artisan olitical service. c. Knowledge of and agreement to abide by provisions. Individuals in Covered Positions shall at the time of their election or appointment or upon the effective date of this section, whichever occurs later, sign an appropriate form prepared by the City Clerk reciting their knowledge of the provisions of this code of conduct and their agreement to abide by such provisions.

8. Gifts and Favors. Individuals in Covered Positions shall fully comply with the regulations, prohibitions and disclosure requirements set forth underlaw concerning the receipt of gifts, honorariums, and any other special favors.

Individuals in Covered Positions should refrain from accepting any gifks, favors or promises of future benefits where it might compromise their ability to act in the public's interest.

9. Confidential Information. " ' Officials must maintain the confidentiality of all closed session information and materials, and any other materials or verbal information which has been identified as being confidential or privileged. Elected and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial or other private interests.

10.Use of Public Resources. Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials shall not use public resources for any personal purpose (e.g., City staff time, equipment, vehicles, supplies orfacilities), whether political or otherwise.

The use of public resources must always be tied to a valid public purpose. 1 1.Representation of Private Interests.
a. In keeping with their role as stewards of the public interest, while in office, members of the City Council shall not appear on behalf of the private interests of third parties before the City Council or any other subservient body of the City.
b. For a period of one year afker leaving office, members of the City Council are prohibited from making any formal or informal appearances before the City, on behalf of third parties, in exchange For compensation, when it is for the purpose of trying to influence a legislative or administrative action involving a permit, license, grant, contract, or the purchase or sale of goods or property, except in their official role on behalf of another public agency. California Government Code section 87406.3.

12.. Elected and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials should seek to represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, or of their respective commission, or committee, to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for that purpose. l/Vhenever an Elcck.d or /\ppointcd officialOfficial chooses to express their individual opinions on a matter, they should make it clear when those comments do not represent the position of the body of which they are a member or the City of Costa Mcsa. Elcctcd and /\ppointcdlndividual officials have the right to endorse candidates For all Council seats or other elected offices. - 7-
566
It is inappropriate to mention or display endorsements during Council meetings, or commission,or committee meetings, or other official City meetings.

13.Policy Role of Elected and Appointed officials. Elcck.d and /\ppointcd e#ieiaisOfficials shall respect and adhere to the Council-Manager structure of the City of Costa Mesa government as outlined in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

In this structure, the City Council determines the policies of the City with the advice, information and analysis provided by City staff, commissions,and committccc, and boards and the public. Except as provided by the City Code, Elected and Appointed officials shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or the professional duties of staff nor shall they impair the ability to implement Council policy decisions.

14.Positive Workplace Environment. " ' Officials shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for City employees and for citizens and businesses dealing with the City.

Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials shall recognize their special role in dealings with City employees to in no way create the perception of inappropriate direction to staff.

15.Ethics Traininq: Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficialc must comply with the ethics training requirement outlined underAssembly Bill 1234 (California Government Code section 53235).

16. ' : Councilshallnot ' toasalaried ' underthe
who is a relative blood or ' within the second
one or more of the members of such Council and neither shall head or other officer havi " ' relative
within such de ree to an such osition.
'-----'l Formatted: Normal
-8-
567
B. CONDUCT
The conduct section of the City's Code of Conduct aims to articulate the expected treatment of Elected and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials towards one another, City staff, constituents, and other individuals encountered while representing the City of Costa Mesa. "Respect" serves as a pervasive and unwavering theme throughout all the conduct guidelines. Elected and Appointed officials are tasked with upholding exemplary behavior consistently. The key principle underlying these guidelines is the demonstration of respect for each individual, employing both words and actions. This emphasis on respect serves as a guiding principle, assisting Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials in making the right choices, even in the most challenging situations.

1. ' Officials' Conduct with Each Other
Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials are individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve in public office in order to preserve and protect the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even though individuals may not agree on every issue.
a. Honor the role of the Mayor or Chairperson in maintaining order, It is the responsibility of the Mayor or Chairperson to keep the comments of Elcctcd and Appointcd officialcOfficials on track during public meetings.

Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials should honor efforts by the Mayor or Chairperson to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement concerning any matter, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following the adopted parliamentary guidelines. b. Practice civility and decorum in discussions and debate, Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information, are legitimate elements of debate by a free democracy in action. However, free debate does not require nor justify the making of belligerent, personal, imperkinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. " ' Officials
should endeavor to keep each other accountable for professional decorum.

Do not interrupt or speak over others, striving to understand various perspectives and opinions while encouraging cooperation and collaboration. c. Demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches, Elected and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials have a public stage and have the responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can Find common ground and seek a compromise that beneTits the community as a whole
----- CFohramraa;ete,dsC:aFloentl0co50l/oor: Custom Color(RGB(8,8,8)), -9-
568
Elcctcd and /\ppointcd

2. Officials' Conduct with City Staff
Governance of a City relies on the cooperative efforts of elected officials, who set policy, appointed officials who advise the elected officials, and City staff who implement and administer the Council's policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community. a. Treat all staff as professionals,
Clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each individual is expected. Poor behavior towards staff is not acceptable.
b. Govern, do not direct
The Mayor and Council Members' role is to set policy and not to provide day to day direction to city employees. Questions of City staff and/or requests for additional information shall be directed to the City Manager or the a ro riate De artment Head, unless the City Manager or De artment Head indicates otherwise. Council Members on constituent concerns di to staff
purposes.
c. DonotdisruptCitystafffromtheirjobs,
Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials should not disrupt City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in performing their job functions in order to have their individual needs met. Elected and Appointed officials should not attend City staff meetings, unless requested by staff. d. Personnel Matters
Personnel matters must be handled by the City Manager and Human Resources division, working together with the employee and department at issuc. Elected and /\ppointcd officials, and if necessary, the City Atkorney.

Other Officials should not get involved in personnel matters, whether to encourage or discourage a particular outcome, or to help investigate a concern. Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials' inappropriate involvement tends to increase litigation against the City, so it should be avoided. All concerns should be directed to the City Manager, who has the responsibility to investigate and make final decisions in accordance with California law and the City's rules.
e. Never publicly criticize an individual employee, Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialcOfficials should never express concerns about the performance of a city employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager. Concerns about staff peformance should only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation. Such concerns can then be addressed in accordance with the City's personnel rules.
f. DonotretaliateorthreatentoretaliateagainstemployeesasaresulQof disagreements over policy recommendations,
It is critical to the success of the City that its employees enjoy a workplace free of the fear of retaliation. The City takes great pride in its creativity and its receptivity to new and different ideas; creativity is fostered by an open and nonjudgmental atmosphere where candor is not penalized. City employees are hired to offer their professional judgments and opinions. Elected and Appointed officials are certainly free to disagree with those judgments; indeed, those Officials ultimately may have the Final word. But those j:-:;-'LFormatted: Not Expanded by / Condensed by ff
'-'f Formatted: Right: 0.63" l
- 10 -
569
disagreements must not extend to threats or generate fear of reprisal.

Elected and Appointed officials enjoy substantial authority within City Hall; this authority must not be exercised in a manner that intimidates staff and degrades morale with resulting damage to the fabric ofthe organization.

No action or retaliation shall be taken
faith a ' issue
no shall be taken ' officer or
witness durinq the course of an investiqation.
concern or violation.
who " as a
g-,h. Do not get involved in administrative functions, Ek.ch:'d and Appointed officialsOfficials acting in their individual capacity should not attempt to influence City staff on the making of appointments, awarding of contracts, selecting of consultants, processing of development applications, or granting of City licenses and permits. h,i. Do not solicit political support from staff,
Elected and Appointed officials should not solicit any type of political support (financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, other campaign-related assistance, etc.) from City staff while they are working. City staff have the constitutional right to support political candidates of their own choosing, but all such activities must be done on the employee's own time, away from the workplace, and not in uniform. ii. No Attorney-Client Relationship
The City Attorney represents the city and not any individual Elected or Appointed official.

3. Elcctcd and f(ppointcd Officials' Conduct with the Public Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process.

No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individuals in Covered Positions toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony.
a. Be welcoming to speakers and treat them with respect, While questions of clarification may be asked, the 0fficia.'s primary role during public testimony is to listen. Officials shou d seek to cemonsyate active listeninq and interest in each speaker's presen any neqative body lanquaqe. This includes refraininq fron use of pe-sonal electronic devices durinq meetinqs to enqaqe in work, or to communicate with members of the public or other decision makinq officials about an item on the aqenda.,
tation, and to avoid
b. Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers, The Mayor or Chairperson will follow the pre-established time allocation for each speaker and seek to apply them equally to every speaker in a fair and impartial manner. If there is a need to shorten the allotted time for speakers, the chair should announce those limits prior to the start of the agenda item whenever possible. Each speaker may only speak once during any particular agenda item unless the Mayor or Chairperson requests additional clarification later in the process. Affer the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless the Mayor or Chairperson reopens the public hearing for a limited and specific purpose c. Practicc activc lictcning
---- CFohram,aaCtteterdsC:aFloent,Oco5ol/oor: Custom Color(RGB(68,68,68)). .---- CFohramraactteterdsc:aFloentl0co5ol/oor: Custom Color(RGB(10,TO,TO)), - 1l -
570
Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialr, should sack to dcmonctratc activc listcning and intcrcct in each spcalacr'c presentation, and to avoid any pessimistic body language.
c. No official or shall en make or ex or
other unilateral ' or communication that excludes the interests of other ' in a matter under consideration when such ' or communication is ' ned to influence the official decision or conduct of the official or other officials or ' in order to obtain a more favored treatment or ' consideration to advance the or ' interests of him/herself or others. The of this rovision is to uarantee that all interested ' to matter shall have n to and their interests. written ex
communication received an official or in matters where all interested ' shouldhavean ual fora ' shallbe
made a of the record the " oral ex communication received under such conditions should be written down in substance the reci ient and also be made a art of the record.
d. Maintain an open mind,
Members of the public deserve an opportunity to influence the thinking of Elected and /\ppointcd officialr,Officials
e. Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public, Elcctcd and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials should not interrupt a speaker during a presentation. However, an Elected orAppointed official can respectfully ask the Mayor or Chairperson for a point of order if a speaker is off the topic, or to ask a question of the speaker., .----- CFohramraaCtteterdsC:aFloent,Oco5ol/oOr: Custom Colot(RGB(T0,1010)), --- CFohramraa;eterdsC:aFloent,Oco501/oor:CustomColor(RGB(10,10,'10)), -12-
571
f. Be accessible to the lic between noticed ' meeti to assist them and connect them with staff who can to their uestions and concerns.

4. Council Conduct with Other Commission, oi; Committee Members
a. If attending a Commission,or Committee meeting, be careful to only express personal opinions,
Council Members may attend any commission,or committee meeting, which are always open to any member of the public. However, they should be sensitive to the way their participation could be viewed as unfairly affecting the process.
b. Limit contact with Commission,and Committee members to questions of clarification,
It is acceptable for Council Members to contact commission,,or committee,-ep members. However, it would be inappropriate to lobby one of these members on behalf of an individual, business, or developer, and vice versa. c. Berespectfulofdiverseopinions,
A primary role of commission,and committcc, and board mcmbers is to represent the many points of view in the community, and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives.

Council Members may have a closer working relationship with some individual members, but they should be fair and respectful of every citizen who chooses to serve as a member of one of the City's commissions,or committees.
d. Keep political support away from public fora,
Commission,and committee members have the right to offer their political support to a Council Member in their private capacity, but not while conducting official City duties. Likewise, Council Members may support any commission,or committee member who may be running for office, but such support should not be expressed during the course of any City funded meeting.
---- Formatted: Not Expanded by / Condensed by
Formatted: Thick underline, Underline color: Custom Color(RGB(87,87,87)), Not Expanded by / Condensed
Formatted: Not Expanded by / Condensed by
-13-
572
C. IMPLEMENTATION

1. The Costa Mesa Code of Conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for the Mayor, Costa Mesa City Council, members of commissions, and committees, and all Covered Positions. In addition, all and /\ppointcd officialsOfficials and designated employees shall be required to take all training mandated by law, including AB '1234 training and AB 1661 training.

2. The provisions of this Code of Conduct express standards of ethical conduct expected for City officials and employees. As an expression of such standards, the provisions of this Code are intended to be self-enforcing for the most part. City officials and employees themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. It will be most effective when City officials and employees are thoroughly familiar with the expressed standards and embrace them.

3. Following its adoption, the City Clerk shall provide all current Officials in Covered Positions with a copy of the newly adopted Code of Conduct and all currant Elected and /\ppointcd Officials will be asked to sign a statement acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to candidates for Mayor, City Council, and applicants to Commissions,and Committcc, and Boards. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to all Elected and Appointed Officials upon entering office and all individuals in Covered Positions will be asked to sign a statement (example below) acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. ' - - - - - l Formatted: Space Before: 4.35 pt
Example.

I affirm that I have read and understand the City of Costa Mesa Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials, and covered City Employees.

Name:

Signature:

Position:

Date:

D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
" ' Officials themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. The chairs of commissions,and committees and the Mayor have the additional responsibility to intervene when Elected and Appointed officials' actions appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when these actions are brought to their attention.

1. A violation of the provisions of this Code of Conduct shall not be considered and shall not constitute a basis for challenging the validity of any decision by the City Council or -14-
573
any other body or agency of the City.

2. All suspected violations of this Code that also pertain to provisions of the Political Reform Act (California Government Code section 81000, et seq.) should be reported to the Fair Political Practices Commission of the State of California.

3. All suspected violations of this Code that may independently constitute criminal offenses, including those outside of the purview of the Fair Political Practices Commission, should be reported to the Office of the Orange County District Attorney.

4. Except as otherwise expressly provided by State law, the following shall constitute the exclusive means and procedures of enforcing the provisions of this Code:
a.Alleged violations committed by the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a member of a City commission should be reported in writing to the City Attorney. * Upon receipt of the report, the City Attorney shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation and endeavoring to avoid future violations in the event one has occurred. b. Alleged violations committed by aan individual in a Covered Position other than the City Council Exccutiw. /\;cistant, Commission members or the City Manaqer should be reported in writing to the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon receipt of the report, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall commence an investigation to determine whether the alleged violation is substantiated. The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation. In the event the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines that a violation has occurred, the City Manager may take appropriate action in accordance with applicable City rules, regulations, and procedures related to employment and/or discipline. c. In the event that the City Attorney or City Manager (or his or her designee) determines that a violation of this division has occurred, appropriate documentation should be prepared to memorialize the determination.

5.The City Council may impose sanctions on members of commissions,and committees.- whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. In addition, the City Council may also act to remove members of commissions,and committees from office or position who violate the provisions of this Code., in accordance with the requirements contained in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

6. The City Council may impose sanctions on Elected officials whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. Serious violations could lead to additional sanctions as deemed appropriate by the City Council.

The definition of a "serious violation" is not set forth by law, but in determining the type of sanction to be considered or imposed, the following factors may be considered:
a. Nature of the violation (conflict of interest, financial disclosures, actions of harassment, abusive conduct, open process of Government, Brown Act, City ordinances and policies, failure to disclose campaign contributions when voting O/7 an item to award an agreemenUcontract, etc.) b. Prior violations by the same individual
c. Other factors which bear upon the seriousness of the violation (failure to '----- '=::' Inden'k: Left: 0.75", No bullets or
' - - - - - 'l Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or - 15 -
574
comply with the laws of the United States of America, State of California, and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties, etc.) - 16 -
575
Attachment 4
City of Costa Mesa
Code of Conduct For
Elected and Appointed Officials
Adopted by Resolution No.
2026-XX
576
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.

Introduction.

A.ETHICS.

B. CONDUCT .

1. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with Each Other..

2. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with City Staff.

3. Elected and Appointed Officials' Conduct with the Public.

4. Council Conduct with Commission and Committee Members C. IMPLEMENT ATION
D.COMPLIANCE ANDENFORCEMENT.
.2
.3
.5
.8
.8
.9
.10
.11
.11
.12
-2-
577
Introduction
The City of Costa Mesa is a general law city governed by the council/manager form of government. The City Council, with the assistance of its advisory commissions and committees, makes policies and fundamental governmental decisions; the City Manager is charged with implementing those policies and decisions and administering the day-to-day affairs of the City with the assistance of his/her staff. The City Council has direct authority over the City Manager and the City Attorney; all other employees of the City are under the direct authority of the City Manager.

These standards are adopted to ensure that the Mayor and members of the City Council, as elected representatives, City employees, and appointed Commissioners, are engaged in public service not for private, personal gain, but to advance the interest of Costa Mesa residents and the entire Costa Mesa community. These standards govern the following Public Officials and City employees: the Mayor; the Mayor Pro Tem; members of the City Council; the City Manager; Assistant and Deputy City Managers the City Clerk; Department Directors: Deputy Department Directors; the Police Chief the Deputy Police Chief; the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chiefs; the City Attorney the Zoning Administrator; the City Engineer and members of the Planning Commission, the Arts Commission, the Parks and Community Services Commission; and any other committee that is advisory in nature. These positions shall be referred to herein collectively as "the Covered Positions."
The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to responsible, transparent, fair, and honest city government that operates in an atmosphere of respect and civility.

Accordingly, the Costa Mesa City Council has adopted this code to:

1. Describe the standards of behavior to which its Elected (hereinafker the term "Elected" refers to the Mayor and City Council) and Appointed (hereinafter the term "Appointed" refers to members of City of Costa Mesa's Commissions and committees, the City Manager and the City Attorney) Officials and high ranking employees aspire

2. Provide an ongoing source of guidance to Elected and Appointed Officials and employees in their day-to-day service to the city: and

3. Promote and maintain high ethical standards.

The citizens of Costa Mesa are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government, which has earned the public's full confidence for integrity. In keeping with the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning of democratic government therefore requires that:

Elected and Appointed officials comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; Elected and Appointed officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions;
public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain: and public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in arc atmosphere of respect and civility.

This Code addresses selective aspects ofthe governance ofthe City and supplements but does not supplant other laws and rules that prescribe the legal responsibilities of the Covered Positions. Those include, among others, the California Constitution, various provisions ofthe California Government Code -3-
578
(including the Brown Act and the Political Reform Act) and the California Labor Code, federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and the provisions of the City's own Municipal Code. Elected and Appointed officials and covered employees should be familiar with these laws to ensure that they exercise their responsibilities properly.

It is not possible for a code of this kind to anticipate and provide a rule of conduct for all situations. It is expected that Elected and Appointed officials and employees in the Covered Positions will manage their behavior in a manner consistent with the rules that follow, respect the chain of command and behave within the bounds of their authority. It is also expected that Elected and Appointed officials will treat each other, City employees, residents and business people with courtesy and respect in a manner that reflects well on the City.

To this end, the Costa Mesa City Council adopts this Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials and designated employees to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective and fair operation.
-4-
579
A. ETHICS
The Ethics section ofthe City's Code ofConduct offers guidance on matters pertaining to ethical considerations, addressing questions of right and wrong.

1. Act in the Public Interest. Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, officials in the Covered Positions ("Officials") should work for the common good of the people of Costa Mesa and not For any private or personal interest, and provide for the fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before them. Officials will serve the community as servant leaders, putting aside self-interest and consider the needs of all residents. Officials should seek to implement transparency and ethical practices, so as to ensure the public's trust and avoid any perception of wrongdoing.

2. Comply with both the spirit and the letter of the Law and City Policy. Officials shall comply with the laws ofthe United States ofAmerica, State ofCalifornia and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties.

3. Conduct of Officials in Covered Positions. The professional and personal conduct of Officials while exercising their office should be above reproach and seek to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Officials should refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other Officials of the City Council, of other commissions or committees of the City, of staff or the public.

4. Conduct at Public Meetinqs. Officials should prepare themselves for public issues, listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand. Officials should limit their use of electronic devices during meetings.

5. Decisions Based on Merit. Officials should base their decisions on the merits and substance ofthe matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

6. Conflicts oflnterest.
a. Officials should seek to ensure their independence and impartiaiity on behalf of the common good, and their compliance with conflict-of-interest laws. Unless i authorized b law, ttciats !'l ruuru riut uss tr rsrt B ions in which they have (a
financial interest. (b) a co i I infprt-sr nr (*1 hn imnprmistiihlm b. Officials who have a potential conflict ofinterest regarding a particular decision shall disclose the matter to the City Atkorney to analyze the potential conflict. If advised by the City Attorney to seek advice from the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) or other appropriate state agency, an Official should not participate in a decision unless and until he or she has requested and receives advice allowing the Official to participate. An Official shall diligently pursue obtaining such advice. The Official shall provide the Mayor and the City Attorney a copy of any written request or advice and conform his or her participation to the advice given. In providing assistance to Officials, the City Attorney represents the city and not individual Officials.

Commented [KB1 ]: There are statutes and regulations relating to financial and conttactual interests. Case law addresses personal bias issue.
uires the disclosure of designated investments, interests in real p of income and gifks in accordance with the City's conflict of inte ere
-5-
Commented [KB2]: Polltical Reform Act requires filing Form 700. City's adopted conflict of interest code determines which officials must file and the level of detail required.
580
----1 Commented [KB3]: Political Reform Act requires this. ] :xct=p
(,,f':c:a
'f di-ifi-p-4

7. City Allegiance and Proper Conduct.
a. Any person in a Covered Position who is employed by another governmental entity or a non-profit, or has an interest in their spouse's employment with a governmental entity or a non-profit shall disclose such employment or interest in a spouse's at the time such or interest
and '
' 4v@nifsHche@p7oympntorinte7estina
spouse's employment does not prohibit participation by the affected Official under state or local law.

Ulllll,ell IlllluHlllJ=! HRJllluuHu. Iklffi ulllHWlul RJI f:lll9 pelt'Oil Ill H LUVkJli use or promise to use his influence or official authority to secure Ilppointment or prospective appointment, to any position ii ice' Witv as a reward or return for oersonal or nartisan political ss i c. Knowledge of and agreement to abide by provisions. Individuals in Covered Positions shall at the time of their election or appointment or upon the effective date of this section, whichever occurs later, sign an appropriate form prepared by the City Clerk reciting their knowledge of the provisions of this code of conduct and their agreement to abide by such provisions.

Commented [KB4]: Government Code section 1090
et seq. contain detailed rules on prohibited financial interests in contracts, and AG and FPPC opinions and case law interpret provisions.

Commented [KB5]: This is partially covered by state law. For govemment employees, no conflict if their department is not involved and they have no part in prepanng the proposal or contracts.

Commented [KB6]: This issue would likely be treated as coveted by the Political Reform Act, but this explicit language is not included; generally it is improper to use oneas position to influence governmental decision
based on financial or other improper considerations.

8. Gifks iuiuiuuais in buveieu i u.sitiuus !!11411 iuuy buuip3y vviu u ' i s and disclosure requirements setforth under lawl ing the receipt of giffs, honorariums, and any other special favoffl uals in Covered Positions should refrain from accepting any gifts, fa promi.qps nritfefrieifisitl'eJn7fit7w h TrTif minhtr;i mnrrimisT fh F!ir ahilitv tri hcf inffl

9. Confidential Informatioii. muaib lllu!:,k lllfjlllLf:fill kllt:! LUlllRN'llklf:111kV ul n i rials, and any other materials or verball
rmation which has been identified as being confidential or privile 'lO.Use of Public Resources.
purpose . ., staff time, equipment, vehicles, supplies o 'lities), whether political or '
Commented [KB7]: These issues are addressed by
portions of the Political Reform Act and
related regulations and opinions.

Commented [KB8]: Brown Act addresses closed
session information. Attomey/client privilege is held by council/city as a whole,
Commented [KB9]: Depending on the conduct at
issue, this might be consit)t.red abuse of public office or potential other cnme.

Commented [KB10]: Covered by statute and case law. 1 1.Representation of Private Interests.
a.
bers of the City Council shall not appear on behalf of the private -6-
581
ityl
b.
rohibited From making any formal or informal appearances before the n behalf of third parties, in exchange for compensation, when it is for urpose of trying to influence a legislative or administrative action in rmit, license, grant, contract, or the purchase or sale of goods or xcept in their official role on behalf of another ni ihlic ansncv Ct'ilifornia 'l 2.m. Officials should seek to represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, or of their respective commission, committee, or board, to the ---- CcOommpmenesnateilodn[K,B1slO]:raPlrsoehsiblsitseudebsyOfstbaltaeslawiffor ----- TCohllms mlselnnctleudde[dKBln1A2]B: G,2o3v4. C,oadlnelns;ction 87406.3.

13.Polic Role of Elected and A ointed officials. Officials shall respect and adhere tooutthllneeCdolnuncil-Mana erstructureoftheCit Ionfi,Cholsstsat,uMcetus,aego!hveerCn:lmtyeCn:,e:un:.1. determines the policies ofthe City with the advice, information and analysis -- - provided by City staff, commissions and committees and the public. Except as provided by the City Code, Elected and Appointed officials shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or the professional duties of staff; nor shall they impair the ability to implement Council policy decisions.

14. Positive Workplace Environment. Officials shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for City employees and for citizens and businesses dealing with the City. Officials shall recognize their special role in dealings with City employees to in no way create the perception of inappropriate direction to staff.

15.Ethics Training:iOfficials must comply with the ethics training requirement outlined underAssembly Bill 1234 (California Government Code section 53235).1 1 6. The City Council shall not appoint to a salaried position under the City government any person who is a relative by blood or marriage within the second degree of any one or more of the members of such Council and neither shall any department head or other officer having appointive power appoint any relative within such degree to any such position.
---- Commented[KB13]:Thereareavarietyofcasesand
opinions from which this is derived. There is no explicit statutory prohibition that clearly states this (other than no use of public resources for political purpose).
--- fCholsmmented [KB14]: The CMMC addresses much of
----f Commented [KB15]: Covered by state law.
-7-
582
B. CONDUCT
The conduct section of the City's Code of Conduct aims to articulate the expected treatment of Officials towards one another, City staff, constituents, and other individuals encountered while representing the City of Costa Mesa. "Respect" serves as a pervasive and unwavering theme throughout all the conduct guidelines.

Elected and Appointed officials are tasked with upholding exemplary behavior consistently. The key principle underlying these guidelines is the demonstration of respect For each individual, employing both words and actions. This emphasis on respect serves as a guiding principle, assisting Officials in making the right choices, even in the most challenging situations.
1 0fficials' Conduct with Each Other
Officials are individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen to serve in public office in order to preserve and protect the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even though individuals may not agree on every issue.
a. Honor the role of the Mayor or Chairperson in maintaining order.

It is the responsibility of the Mayor or Chairperson to keep the comments of Officials on track during public meetings. Officials should honor efforts by the Mayor or Chairperson to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement concerning any matter, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following the adopted parliamentary guidelines. b. Practice civility and decorum in discussions and debate.

Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information, are legitimate elements of debate by a free democracy in action. However, free debate does not require nor justify the making of belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. Officials should endeavor to keep each other accountable for professional decorum. Do not interrupt or speak over others, striving to understand various perspectives and opinions while encouraging cooperation and collaboration.
c. Demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches.

Officials have a public stage and have the responsibility to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole. 2 0fficials' Conduct with City Staff
Governance of a City relies on the cooperative efforts of elected officials, who set policy, appointed officials who advise the elected officials, and City staff who implement and administer the Council's policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community. a. Treat all staff as professionals.

Clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each individual is expected. Poor behavior towards staff is not acceptable.
b. Govern, do not direct
The Mayor and Council Members' role is to set policy and not to provide day -8-
583
to day direction to city employees. Questions of City staff and/or requests for additional information shall be directed to the City Manager or the appropriate Department Head, unless the City Manager or Department Head indicates otherwise. Council Members may pass on constituent concerns directly to staff designated by the City Manager or Department Head for such purposes.
c. DonotdisruptCitystafffromthei2obs.

Officials should not disrupt City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in peforming their job functions in order to have their individual needs met. Elected and Appointed officials should not attend City staff meetings, unless requested by staff.
d. Personnel Matters
esources division, working together with the employee and and if necessary, the City Attorney. Other Officials should not in personnel matters! whether fn pncnnciierarnT,nffrJlrlcilasTlsn:11:nrr:an;'p,Qprll!te involvement tends to increase litigation against the City, so it should be avoided. All concerns should be directed to the City Manager, who has the responsibility to investigate and make final decisions in accordance with California law and the City's rules.

Commented [KB16]: Some of this is addressed in
privacy laws; some relates to fhe Council/Manager
form of govemment which makes CM the appointing
authority from subordinate employees.
e. Never publicly criticize an individual employee.

Officials should never express concerns about the peformance of a city employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee's manager.

Concerns about staff performance should only be made to the City Manager through private correspondence or conversation. Such concerns can then be addressed in accordance with the City's personnel rules. f. Donotretaliateorthreatentoretaliateagainstemployeesasaresultof disagreements over policy recommendations.

It is critical to the success of the City that its employees enjoy a workplace freeoflefearofretaliationl"jheCitytakes3;1reatprideinij4creativityan4 $ receptivity to new and different ideas; creativity is fostered by an open and nonjudgmental atmosphere where candor is not penalized. City employees are hired to offer their professional judgments and opinions. Elected and Appointed officials are certainly free to disagree with those judgments; indeed, those Officials ultimately may have the final word. But those disagreements must not extend to threats or generate fear of reprisal.

Elected and Appointed officials enjoy substantial authority within City Hall:
this authority must not be exercised in a manner that intimidates staff and degrades morale with resulting damage to the fabric ofthe organization.

Commented [KB17]: Employees may not be retaliated
for raising in good faith potential violations of laws and safety regulations. Strlctly speaking there is no law against criticizing an employee to the CM regarding the perceived support for or propriety of an opinion or the manner in which employees present themselves
(hostile, condescending, etc.). Intimidating staff,
however, could definitely lead to hostile environment claims or other claims of discrimination.
in good faith a perceived issue, problem, concern or violation. h. iDJnptgetinvolvedinadrri iriisjratiyejHr'i4tjp33.

Officials acting in their individual capacity should not attempt to influence City staff on the making of appointments, awarding of contracts, selecting of consultants, processing ofdevelopment applications, or granting of City licenses and permits.
----- Commented [KB18]: Prohibited by stale and federal law.
i. Do not solicit political support from staff.
-9-
584
ff;. r 'c;;
uld9 ul pKJ!:ikBT!b OT IdWll bli
lf illb, rmlllb ull bulJpulJ
:hotXtnglpttys3ai'rhayet0e constijutionalrighttosuppqrt politic,alca ndida':es of their own choosing, but all such activities must be done on the employee's own time, away from the workplace, and not in uniform. j. No Attorney-Client Relationship
The City Attorney represents the city and not any individual Elected or Appointed official.

3. Officials' Conduct with the Public
Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process.

No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individuals in Covered Positions toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony.
a. Be welcoming to speakers and treat them with respect.

While questions of clarification may be asked, the Official's primary role during public testimony is to listen. Officials should seek to demonstrate active listening and interest in each speaker's presentation, and to avoid any negative body language. This includes refraining from use of personal electronic devices during meetings to engage in work, or to communicate with members of the public or other decision making officials about an item on the agenda.
b. Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers.

The Mayor or Chairperson will follow the pre-established time allocation for each speaker and seek to apply them equally to every speaker in a fair and impartial manner. If there is a need to shorten the allotted time for speakers, the chair should announce those limits prior to the start of the agenda item whenever possible. Each speaker may only speak once during any particular agenda item unless the Mayor or Chairperson requests additional clarification later in the process. Afker the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless the Mayor or Chairperson reopens the public hearing for a limited and specific purpose. c. No official or employee shall encourage, make or accept any ex parte or other unilateral application or communication that excludes the interests of other parties in a matter under consideration when such application or communication is designed to influence the official decision or conduct of the official or other officials, employees or agencies in order to obtain a more favored treatment or special consideration to advance the personal or private interests of him/herself or others. The purpose of this provision is to guarantee that all interested parties to any matter shall have equal opportunity to express and represent their interests. Any written ex parte communication received by an official or employee in matters where all interested parties should have an equal opporkunity for a hearing shall be made a part of the record by the recipient. Any oral ex parte communication received under such conditions should be written down in substance by the recipient and also be made a part of the record.
d. Maintain an open mind.

Members of the public deserve an opportunity to influence the thinking of Officials.
----- Conunemed[KBl9]:Partofthisiscoveredbystate
statute. Many people do not understand the limits of
what they can do.
- 10 -
585
e. Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public.

Officials should not interrupt a speaker during a presentation. However, an Elected or Appointed official can respectfully ask the Mayor or Chairperson for a point of order if a speaker is off the topic, or to ask a question of the speaker.
f. Be accessible to the public between noticed City meetings to assist them and connect them with staff who can respond to their questions and concerns. 4 Council Conduct with Other Commission or committee members The City Council has established certain commissions and committees as a means to assist the Council in making decisions, and in gathering more community input. Citizens who serve as members of the City's various commissions and committees, become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council. They are a valuable resource to the City's leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect. a. If attending a Commission, Committee, or Board meeting, be careful to only express personal opinions.

Council Members may attend any commission, committee, or board meeting, which are always open to any member of the public. However, they should be sensitive to the way their participation could be viewed as unfairly affecting the process.
b. Limit contact with commission and committee members to questions of clarification.

It is acceptable for Council Members to contact commission or committee members. However, it would be inappropriate to lobby one of these members on behalT of an individual, business, or developer, and vice versa. c. Be respectful ofdiverse opinions.

A primary role of commission and committee members is to represent the many points of view in the community, and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives. Council Members may have a closerworking relationship with some individual members, but they should be fair and respectful of every citizen who chooses to serve as a member of one of the City's commissions or committees. d. Keep political support away from public fora.

Commission and committee members have the right to offer their political support to a Council Member in their private capacity, but not while conducting official City duties. Likewise, Council Members may support any commission, committee, or board member who may be running for office, but such support should not be expressed during the course of any City funded meeting.
- 1l -
586
C. IMPLEMENTATION

2. The provisions of this Code of Conduct express standards of ethical conduct expected for City officials and employees. As an expression of such standards, the provisions of this Code are intended to be self-enforcing for the most part. City officials and employees themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. It will be most effective when City officials and employees are thoroughly familiar with the expressed standards and embrace them.

3. Following its adoption, the City Clerk shall provide all current Officials in Covered Positions with a copy of the newly adopted Code of Conduct and all current Officials will be asked to sign a statement acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to candidates for Mayor, City Council, and applicants to Commissions, Committee, and Boards. The City Clerk shall provide a copy of the Code of Conduct to all Elected and Appointed Officials upon entering office and all individuals in Covered Positions will be asked to sign a statement (example below) acknowledging they have read and understand the Code of Conduct.

Example:

I affirm that I have read and understand the City of Costa Mesa Code of Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials, and covered City Employees.

Name:

Signature:

Position:

Date:

D. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEIVIENT
Officials themselves have the primary responsibility to ensure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. The chairs of commissions, committees and boards and the Mayor have the additional responsibility to intervene when Elected and Appointed officials' actions appear to be in violation of the Code of Conduct or when these actions are brought to their attention.

1. A violation of the provisions of this Code of Conduct shall not be considered and shall not constitute a basis for challenging the validity of any decision by the City Council or any other body or agency of the City.

2. All suspected violations of this Code that also pertain to provisions of the Political Reform Act (California Government Code section 81000, et seq.) should be reported to the Fair Political Practices Commission of the State of California. - 12 -
587

3. All suspected violations of this Code that may independently constitute criminal offenses, including those outside of the purview of the Fair Political Practices Commission, should be reported to the Office of the Orange County District Attorney.

4. Except as otherwise expressly provided by State law, the following shall constitute the exclusive means and procedures of enforcing the provisions of this Code:
a. Alleged violations committed by the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a member of a City commission should be reported in writing to the City Attorney.

Upon receipt of the report, the City Attorney shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation and endeavoring to avoid future violations in the event one has occurred. b. Alieged violations committed by an individual in a Covered Position other than the City Council, Commission members or the City Manager should be reported in writing to the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon receipt of the report, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall commence an investigation to determine whether the alleged violation is substantiated. The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall discuss the matter with the person who is the subject of the allegation, advising such person of the alleged violation. In the event the City Manager, or his/her designee, determines that a violation has occurred, the City Manager may take appropriate action in accordance with applicable City rules, regulations, and procedures related to employment and/or discipline. c. In the event that the City Attorney or City Manager (or his or her designee) determines that a violation of this division has occurred, appropriate documentation should be prepared to memorialize the determination.

5. The City Council may impose sanctions on members of commissions and committees whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. In addition, the City Council may also act to remove members of commissions, committees and boards from office or position who violate the provisions of this Code, in accordance with the requirements contained in the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.

6. The City Council may impose sanctions on Elected officials whose conduct does not comply with the City's Code of Conduct such as reprimand or formal censure. Serious violations could lead to additional sanctions as deemed appropriate by the City Council.

The definition of a "serious violation" is not set forth by law, but in determining the type of sanction to be considered or imposed, the following factors may be considered:
a. Nature of the violation (conflict of interest, financial disclosures, actions of harassment, abusive conduct, open process of Government, Brown Act, City ordinances and policies, failure to disclose campaign contributions when voting on an item to award an agreemenUcontract, etc.) b. Prior violations by the same individual
c. Other Factors which bear upon the seriousness of the violation (failure to comply with the laws of the United States of America, State of California, and the City of Costa Mesa in the performance of their public duties, etc.) - 13 -
588

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
TITLE:

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ TRANSPORTATION

SERVICES DIVISION
PRESENTED BY: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: BRETT ATENCIO THOMAS, ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR, (714) 754-5275
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the 2025 Active Transportation Committee Annual Report.

BACKGROUND:

In January 2015, the City Council established the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) to continually evaluate the status of the City’sbikeway & pedestrian access while also promoting biking and walkability throughout the City. The composition of the committee is nine (9) members appointed by the City Council to serve two (2) year terms.

Since its formation, the ATC has played a pivotal role in the development of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in the City, along with the execution of the City’s2018 ATC and 2024 Pedestrian Master Plan.

ANALYSIS:

Throughout 2025, the Committee actively engaged in various activities, including the development of Committee Goals and Objectives, assistance in community events, and providing feedback on projects that enhance mobility within the City.

During the last year, the ATC has received presentations from City staff related to the following projects and has supported various accomplishments shown in Attachment 1 that improve mobility and safety for people walking and bicycling:

1. Safe Routes to School Action Plan

2. Placentia Avenue/Center Street Circulation and Mobility Improvements Project

3. Fairview Road (Fair Drive to Adams Avenue) Design Concept

4. Let’s Go Costa Mesa On-Demand Transit Update

5. Newport Boulevard/Fair Drive Intersection Improvements The ATC recognizes the completion of the Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive intersection

Page 1 of 3 ends

589
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
The ATC recognizes the completion of the Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive intersection improvement project, which received awards from the following organizations:

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Orange County Chapter

2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Los Angeles Section

3. Association of California Cities Orange County Chapter The ATC is pleased to see the culture of cycling occur within the City through community-led events and recognition by the National League of American Bicyclists where the City was awarded the Bronze level Bicycle Friendly Community. Community efforts to continue the culture of cycling within the City are demonstrated by the following activities:

1. ATC staff participated in community events such as Earth Day, SoCalCross Cyclocross race, City-led Bicycle Safety Rodeos, and the November World Day of Remembrance Bicycle Ride.

2. Creation of the College Park Elementary School Bike Bus in Fall 2025 by parents and youth.

3. Lillordag community bike rides that occur weekly on Wednesday nights originating at Lions Park.

4. Bicycle stores and businesses that host bike rides such as the “Inconvenience Store” rides.

Committee Goals and Objectives for 2026:

In October 2025, the ATC developed the following goals and objectives to guide future activities by the Committee over the next year:

1. Provide active transportation education and advocacy to stakeholders (Caltrans, OCTA, NMUSD), City, County, etc.). This will need identification of specific targets and a list or matrix of activities to be conducted.

2. Develop a process for tracking progress of and updating the Active Transportation Plan within the Circulation Element. The outcome would be a list of activities, list of deliverables (e.g., recommendations to City Council) and a complementary schedule.

3. Work with staff to develop a frequency and content of reporting on pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle involved collisions (e.g., raw numbers) that will be included in the Annual Report to Council.

The ATC met in March and identified the following challenges to improving safety for people walking and cycling:

1. Increased use of Multi-modal Transportation - placed a higher demand for more active transportation infrastructure, enforcement, staff and public awareness of municipal code.

2. Pace of Progress - increased efforts are needed to achieve the ATP goals of 10% bicycling and 20% walking mode split within the existing budget constraints.

3. Project Management - existing transportation staff are assigned to various duties and additional project management staff could help reduce the backlog of projects.

4. Vehicles & Road Hazards - excessive speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence remain hazards that create risk for people walking and bicycling.

The ATC will continue to pursue the outlined goals and objectives for 2026 and work with City Council, staff and community partners to address the identified challenges.

Page 2 of 3 ends

590
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
ALTERNATIVES:

This item is administrative in nature.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Funding for Active Transportation Committee activities is currently supported in the Public Works Transportation Services Division and has no fiscal impact on the FY 2025-26 budget.

LEGAL REVIEW:

There is no legal review required for this report.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goals:
· Strengthen the public’s safety and improve the quality of life. · Maintain and enhance the City’s facilities, equipment, and technology. · Advance environmental sustainability and climate resiliency.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the Active Transportation Committee Annual Report.

Page 3 of 3 ends

591

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
TITLE:

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ TRANSPORTATION

SERVICES DIVISION
PRESENTED BY: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: BRETT ATENCIO THOMAS, ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR, (714) 754-5275
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the 2025 Active Transportation Committee Annual Report.

BACKGROUND:

In January 2015, the City Council established the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) to continually evaluate the status of the City’sbikeway & pedestrian access while also promoting biking and walkability throughout the City. The composition of the committee is nine (9) members appointed by the City Council to serve two (2) year terms.

Since its formation, the ATC has played a pivotal role in the development of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in the City, along with the execution of the City’s2018 ATC and 2024 Pedestrian Master Plan.

ANALYSIS:

Throughout 2025, the Committee actively engaged in various activities, including the development of Committee Goals and Objectives, assistance in community events, and providing feedback on projects that enhance mobility within the City.

During the last year, the ATC has received presentations from City staff related to the following projects and has supported various accomplishments shown in Attachment 1 that improve mobility and safety for people walking and bicycling:

1. Safe Routes to School Action Plan

2. Placentia Avenue/Center Street Circulation and Mobility Improvements Project

3. Fairview Road (Fair Drive to Adams Avenue) Design Concept

4. Let’s Go Costa Mesa On-Demand Transit Update

5. Newport Boulevard/Fair Drive Intersection Improvements The ATC recognizes the completion of the Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive intersection

Page 1 of 3 ends

592
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
The ATC recognizes the completion of the Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive intersection improvement project, which received awards from the following organizations:

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Orange County Chapter

2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Los Angeles Section

3. Association of California Cities Orange County Chapter The ATC is pleased to see the culture of cycling occur within the City through community-led events and recognition by the National League of American Bicyclists where the City was awarded the Bronze level Bicycle Friendly Community. Community efforts to continue the culture of cycling within the City are demonstrated by the following activities:

1. ATC staff participated in community events such as Earth Day, SoCalCross Cyclocross race, City-led Bicycle Safety Rodeos, and the November World Day of Remembrance Bicycle Ride.

2. Creation of the College Park Elementary School Bike Bus in Fall 2025 by parents and youth.

3. Lillordag community bike rides that occur weekly on Wednesday nights originating at Lions Park.

4. Bicycle stores and businesses that host bike rides such as the “Inconvenience Store” rides.

Committee Goals and Objectives for 2026:

In October 2025, the ATC developed the following goals and objectives to guide future activities by the Committee over the next year:

1. Provide active transportation education and advocacy to stakeholders (Caltrans, OCTA, NMUSD), City, County, etc.). This will need identification of specific targets and a list or matrix of activities to be conducted.

2. Develop a process for tracking progress of and updating the Active Transportation Plan within the Circulation Element. The outcome would be a list of activities, list of deliverables (e.g., recommendations to City Council) and a complementary schedule.

3. Work with staff to develop a frequency and content of reporting on pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle involved collisions (e.g., raw numbers) that will be included in the Annual Report to Council.

The ATC met in March and identified the following challenges to improving safety for people walking and cycling:

1. Increased use of Multi-modal Transportation - placed a higher demand for more active transportation infrastructure, enforcement, staff and public awareness of municipal code.

2. Pace of Progress - increased efforts are needed to achieve the ATP goals of 10% bicycling and 20% walking mode split within the existing budget constraints.

3. Project Management - existing transportation staff are assigned to various duties and additional project management staff could help reduce the backlog of projects.

4. Vehicles & Road Hazards - excessive speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence remain hazards that create risk for people walking and bicycling.

The ATC will continue to pursue the outlined goals and objectives for 2026 and work with City Council, staff and community partners to address the identified challenges.

Page 2 of 3 ends

593
File #: 26-217 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
ALTERNATIVES:

This item is administrative in nature.

FISCAL REVIEW:

Funding for Active Transportation Committee activities is currently supported in the Public Works Transportation Services Division and has no fiscal impact on the FY 2025-26 budget.

LEGAL REVIEW:

There is no legal review required for this report.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goals:
· Strengthen the public’s safety and improve the quality of life. · Maintain and enhance the City’s facilities, equipment, and technology. · Advance environmental sustainability and climate resiliency.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the Active Transportation Committee Annual Report.

Page 3 of 3 ends

594

COSTA MESA

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

COMMITTEE

ANNUAL REPORT
MARCH 17, 2026
1 City Council Meeting
Attachment 1
595
2025 Committee Composition
and Meeting Attendees
Members
Andrew Barnes (Chair)
Michael Moses Nolf
(Vice Chair)
Tiia Alcazar
Alex Campoli
Farhad Khosravi
Florence Martin
Robert Morse
Joselyn Perez
Trace Yulie
Liaisons
Arlis Reynolds
Andrea Marr
Sarah Coley
City Staff
Raja Sethuraman
Paul Martin
Brett Atencio Thomas
Ramin Nikoui
Elizabeth Palacio
2 596

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION VISION
City Council Goals/Objectives
• Advance environmental
sustainability and climate
resiliency
• Strengthen the public’s safety
and improve the quality of life
o Implement a Safe Routes to
School Program
o Approve a plan to mitigate
collisions and injuries on
roadways
Goals of the Active Transportation Plan (ATP)
• Promote a user-friendly and welcoming Active
Transportation System in Costa Mesa
• Create a safer place to walk and ride a bicycle
• Integrate Active Transportation Elements into the
circulation systems and land use planning
• Promote an Active Transportation culture
• Promote the positive air quality, health, and
economic benefits of Active Transportation
• Monitor, evaluate, and pursue funding for
implementation of the Active Transportation Plan
3 3
597
Committee Meetings
 Met ten times in 2025
 Forum for public comments
 Presented community voices/issues to staff
 Advocated for City to apply pressure to
Caltrans for safety improvements
 Provided letters of support for grant
applications
 Active Transportation design review
 Advocated for road safety improvements
4 4
598
ATC Identified 2025/26 Near-Term
Goals

1. Provide active transportation education and advocacy to stakeholders (e.g., Caltrans, OCTA, NMUSD, City, County). This requires identification of specific targets and a list or matrix of activities to be conducted.

2. Develop a process for tracking progress of and updating the Active Transportation Plan within the Circulation Element. The outcome would be a list of activities, list of deliverables (e.g., recommendations to City Council) and an associated schedule.

3. Work with staff to develop a frequency and content of reporting on pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle involved collisions that will be included in the Annual Report to Council.
5 599
Bicycle
Count
Data
OCTA 2025
6 600
2023 2024
7 Map Source: Berkeley TIMS; Data Source: CMPD
2025*
*Through 9/30/25
Bicycle and Pedestrian Fatality/Injury Maps
Pedestrian and Bicyclist
Crash Results 2023-2025
Total Crashes: 456
Total Deaths: 8
Collisions Involving
Bicycle(s)
2023 – 133
2024 – 151
2025 – 112*
7 601
People, Not Statistics – Newport Blvd.

Fatalities
8 Michael McLaughlin (Newport & E. 19th) 2009
Pedestrian
David Michael Hird (Newport & Rochester) 2013
Pedestrian
Michelle Lee Lounsbury (Newport & Bay) 2013
Bicyclist
Sudi Nsengiyumva (Newport & E. 18th) 2015
Pedestrian
Misael Espinoza (Newport & W. 19th) 2015
Pedestrian
Alexandria Faith Hill (Newport & Rochester) 2016
Pedestrian
Jorge Luis Alcazar-Arellano (Newport & Ford) 2016
Pedestrian
Patrick Charles Ogara (Newport & E. 17th) 2016
Pedestrian
David Stryder Franklin (Newport & E. 17th) 2018
Pedestrian
Jose Armando Racancoj (Newport & E. 17th) 2021
Pedestrian
Richard Harold Smith (Newport & Industrial) 2022
Pedestrian
David Jason Franz (Newport & E. 17th) 2022
Pedestrian
Hani Banil Atalla (Newport & Broadway) 2023
Pedestrian
Sharen Fay Scott (Newport & Harbor) 2024
Pedestrian
Victor Anthony Coronado (Newport & E. 19th) 2024
Pedestrian
Jose Rosario Rojasmoreno (Newport & Broadway)
2024 Pedestrian
602

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
9 603
Neighborhood Safety
Improvements
10  Del Mar Avenue
 Washington
Avenue/Gisler Avenue
All-Way Stop Sign
 Wallace Avenue/18th
Street
 Westminster
Avenue/16th Street
 West 19th Street
 Hamilton Street
 College Avenue/Watson
Avenue
604
Road/Intersection
Mobility and Safety
Improvements
 Adams/Pinecreek
 Fairview Road S. of Fair Dr
 Pedestrian Safety
Daylighting (Various
Locations)
 Jordan Park Crosswalk &
Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
 Placentia Avenue Cycle
Track Gap Closure
 Mendoza Drive Bike Lane
11 605
Project Recognition
 American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE) OC Chapter 2025 Award for
Outstanding Bikeway and Trails
Project
 American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE) Los Angeles Section 2
Award for Outstanding Bikeway
and Trails Project
 Association of California Cities –
Orange County 2025 Award for
Transportation Innovation and
Mobility Solutions 1
4 Adams Avenue/Pinecreek Drive Intersection
Improvement Project
13 606

COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
 Walk to School Day and Bike
to School Day: Both events
continue to grow year after year!
▪ 14 Schools
participated in
Walk to School Day
▪ 11 schools
participated in Bike
to School Day
▪ ~3,200 students
participated along
with Committee
Members, CMPD,
Staff, NMUSD and
local advocates
15 14
607

COMMUNITY

ACTIVITIES
Earth Day
TEAM SoCalCross
Cyclocross Race
Bike and E-Bike
Safety Training
World Day of
Remembrance
15 608

COMMUNITY

INITIATIVE
16  College Park Bike Bus
 Lillordag community
weekly bike rides
 Bike store rides
609
Understanding
the E-Issue
E-Bikes
max assist speed 28 mph
Under 16, max speed 20 mph
Under 18, helmet mandatory
E-Motorcycles and the rest
Max speed >28 mph
Must meet CVC for street-legal vehicles
License plate, VIN, headlights, turn indicators, etc.
Requires Class C license to operate
CVC regulates safe operation of
bicycles, e-bikes, and e-motorcycles
18 610

COMMITTEE

RECOMMENDATIONS
19 CIP
Receive ATC’s
list of
recommended
projects for
next year’s
budget
Align grant
applications
process with
CIP priorities
Collect safety
data before
and after CIP
implementation
Safety
Safe Routes to
School: Work with
Staff, Consultant,
NMUSD and
community
Increase
implementation of
red curb painting
consistent with CA
Daylighting law
AB413
Support CMPD
enforcement of
the CVC as
related to illegal
e-motorcycles,
and the safe
operation of e-
bikes
Education
Promote Active
Transportation
related actions
and projects on
City website and
social media
channels
frequently during
May - National
Bike Month
Present to the
Chamber of
Commerce the
well-documented
economic
benefits of bicycle
ridership to local
business
Other
Adopt a bike
parking ordinance
that meets APBP
standards
Implement no turn
on red light rule at
recommended
intersections
Council work
through legislative
channels to help
Caltrans improve
safety along 55/
Newport Blvd
corridor
Update the Active
Transportation
Plan
611

CHALLENGES

INCREASED USE OF MULTI-MODAL

TRANSPORTATION
Places a higher demand for more
Active Transportation infrastructure
(including permanent separation),
police, staff and public awareness
of new municipal code.

PACE OF PROGRESS
Mode shift to biking and walking
is good but need to make more
progress to meet ATP goals of
10% bicycle and 20% walking.

Budget constraints.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Existing staff split their time with
other job responsibilities.

Backlog of Capital Improvements
would benefit from additional PM
resources.

VEHICLES & ROAD HAZARDS
Excessive speed, DUI and
distracted driving.
25 18
612

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
TITLE:

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PSOMAS FOR THE FAIRVIEW PARK WEST

BLUFF RESTORATION PROJECT
DEPARTMENT: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
PRESENTED BY: BRIAN GRUNER. PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: KELLY DALTON, FAIRVIEW PARK ADMINISTRATOR (714) 754- 5135
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to PSOMAS to provide engineering design, environmental planning, cultural resource management, and related professional services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project in an amount not to exceed $533,189 for a term of two (2) years from March 17, 2026, to March 16, 2028 with three (3) additional one- year renewal options.

2. Authorize a ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $53,319 for unforeseen costs.

3. Authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) and future amendments to the agreement within City Council authorized limits.

BACKGROUND:

Fairview Park is the City’slargest park, spanning over 200 acres of open space that forms an integral component of the lower Santa Ana River ecological corridor. Within Fairview Park’s208 acres, the site includes sacred tribal ancestral lands, a Nationally Registered Cultural Resource Historic Site, and several distinct habitat communities that provide critical habitat for an array of sensitive, rare, and endangered plant and animal species. The park provides passive and unique recreational opportunities while serving as a critical open space resource within the City. Due to the presence of protected habitats, sensitive cultural resources, and special-status wildlife species, projects within Fairview Park require careful planning, interdisciplinary coordination, and compliance with applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations.

The Fairview Park Master Plan (2008) is currently in the process of being updated, with an anticipated final adoption in summer 2026. The Fairview Park Master Plan establishes long-term goals for protecting, preserving, and enhancing the park’s natural and cultural resources while

Page 1 of 5 ends

613
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
goals for protecting, preserving, and enhancing the park’s natural and cultural resources while allowing for compatible public access and recreation.

As part of these long-term objectives, the City has identified the Fairview Park West Bluff as a priority area, requiring stabilization and ecological restoration. The west bluffs of Fairview Park have been the subject of study since the 1990s due to slope stability and slope erosion concerns, which pose long-term risks to park resources, trails, and public safety if left unaddressed.

In 2023, the City was awarded $2 million dollars from then State Senator David Min to address the Fairview Park West Bluff erosion problem. In 2024, the Parks and Community Services Department and the Public Works Department jointly hired a geotechnical firm to complete a preliminary geotechnical report to characterize the west bluff soils and assess potential alternatives to address erosion issues and slope failures. After a review of the analysis, the City issued a design/planning RFP in mid-2025 and completed the consultant evaluation process in late 2025.

The Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project is intended to address the slope erosion concerns through a comprehensive planning and design effort that integrates geotechnical stability improvements with habitat restoration and resource protection elements. The design project will emphasize solutions that minimize disturbance, restore native plant communities, protect sensitive cultural resources, and maintain the park’s natural character, consistent with the Fairview Park Master Plan and the City’s environmental stewardship goals.

Project Description
The Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project focuses on the evaluation, design, planning, and permitting of stabilization and restoration measures for erosional features along the park’swestern bluffs. The project is a planning and design effort that will culminate in the preparation of construction -ready plans, specifications, and cost estimates for future implementation. The City is seeking professional services that include, but are not limited to:
· Project coordination and management
· Review of existing studies, plans, and technical data · Geotechnical and engineering site design evaluations
· Engineering design for slope stabilization and erosion control · Habitat restoration and revegetation design
· Environmental planning and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation · Resource agency coordination and environmental permitting support · Cultural Resource Management Plan preparation
· Preparation of construction quantities, cost estimates, and bid documents · Public outreach and stakeholder coordination
· Bidding and construction support services
The integrated approach to this project is intended to improve long-term slope stability, reduce

Page 2 of 5 ends

614
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
The integrated approach to this project is intended to improve long-term slope stability, reduce erosion risks, enhance native habitat, and protect sensitive biological and cultural resources, while maintaining public use and trail access for park visitors.

ANALYSIS:

On June 5, 2025, a Request for Proposal (RFP No. 25-23) for professional engineering and environmental planning services was released for the Fairview Park Bluff Restoration Project. In response to the City’s RFP, the City received three (3) proposals from the following firms:
· Dudek
· PSOMAS
· S2SERM
Proposals were reviewed and scored by an interdisciplinary panel of subject matter experts with expertise in environmental planning, civil design, and public works professional services. Proposals were reviewed for compliance and responsiveness to the City’sRequest for Proposals, qualifications of key personnel, method of approach, qualifications and experience of the firm, cost, and references.

Following the initial screening and review of proposals, each of the three consultants were invited to participate in an oral interview to assist in the evaluation process. Based on the composite scores from the evaluation panel, PSOMAS was determined to be the highest rated and most qualified proposer (Table 1).

Table 1: RFP Results
Proposer Total Score Rank
PSOMAS 2687.5 1st
Dudek 2238.55 2nd
S2SERM 2152.1 3rd
Consultant Qualifications
During the evaluation, PSOMAS presented their firm as possessing a thorough understanding of the project and demonstrated extensive experience and technical ability to perform the outlined scope of work in the RFP. PSOMAS has supported several public agencies in Southern California with engineering design, ecological restoration, and related environmental planning support for over three decades. Throughout the evaluation process, PSOMAS also emphasized its team’s strengths in coordinating on similar interdisciplinary and multi-benefit projects, which is of particular value for this project, given the site’sunique planning variables and multi-benefit objectives. In addition, PSOMAS demonstrated comparative strength in its public outreach approach, and emphasized the firm’s careful consideration of stakeholder concerns prior to advancing the project design. This intentional and meaningful community engagement effort will be essential to building and maintaining community support for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project and will ensure the project

Page 3 of 5 ends

615
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
team addresses key community concerns early.

PSOMAS’ proposed approach emphasizes the integration of safety, efficiency, and sensitivity to onsite resources and community feedback in developing the project design. The firm’s ability to integrate multi-disciplinary data, develop long-term preservation strategies, and minimize impacts to existing resources will be critical for the successful design of the project. PSOMAS also demonstrated a strong understanding of the site’senvironmental complexity, and the importance of balancing geotechnical stabilization with habitat restoration and cultural resource protection. This comprehensive and collaborative design philosophy aligns closely with the City’sgoals for long-term stewardship and conservation of Fairview Park’s natural resources.

The evaluation panel determined that PSOMAS’ technical proposal and interview responses distinguished the firm through the strength of its multidisciplinary team, its relevant experience with complex habitat restoration and slope stabilization projects, and its clearly articulated project approach. In particular, PSOMAS emphasized that the final design solution would not be predetermined but instead developed through detailed evaluation of the specific conditions associated with each erosion feature along the west bluff. This adaptive methodology recognizes the unique geotechnical, biological, and cultural resource conditions present at the site and emphasizes tailoring stabilization and restoration strategies accordingly, while also incorporating input from the local community and cultural resource stakeholders. Dudek and S2SERM also submitted qualified proposals demonstrating relevant experience and technical capabilities, however their responses presented more predefined design approaches with less emphasis on an adaptive methodology tailored to site-specific conditions and stakeholder considerations identified for the project. Based on the evaluation criteria established in the RFP, including firm qualifications, team expertise, and project approach, the evaluation panel determined that PSOMAS’proposal represented the highest ranked and most responsive proposal for the project.

Project Funding
In 2023, the City was awarded a significant park and open space investment through state budget allocations from then-Senator Dave Min (current Congressman). As part of the 2022-23 California State Budget, a total of $10M was awarded to the City of Costa Mesa to support park improvements, habitat restoration, and open-space enhancements, including $2.0M allocated towards this project in Fairview Park. This historic grant provides the funding source to support the planning and design phase of the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project, as well as the future construction and implementation phase. After the design amount of $0.59 million is spent, the remaining $1.4 million project balance will be used to fund the construction phase once the design and planning phase is completed by PSOMAS.

The Fairview Park Bluffs Restoration Project was postponed due to the prioritization of several projects, such as the draft Fairview Park Master Plan, the new Mesa Restoration Project, and ongoing restoration efforts. These projects are well underway, and staff is now able to proceed with the Bluffs Restoration Project and is recommending the award of contract to PSOMAS.

ALTERNATIVES:

Staff does not recommend any alternatives at this time.

Page 4 of 5 ends

616
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
FISCAL REVIEW:

Funding for this agreement inclusive of a ten percent (10%) contingency for a total amount of $586,508 is available from the City’sState Grants Fund (231) and was funded by a $2 million grant from the Office of former Senator Dave Min (current U.S. Representative) through the California State Parks Department. The current available project balance is approximately $1.96 million.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed this report and the agreement and approves them as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goal:
· Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to PSOMAS to provide engineering design, environmental planning, cultural resource management, and related professional services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project in an amount not to exceed $533,189 for a term of two (2) years from March 17, 2026, to March 16, 2028 with three (3) additional one- year renewal options.

2. Authorize a ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $53,319 for unforeseen costs.

3. Authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) and future amendments to the agreement within City Council authorized limits.

Page 5 of 5 ends

617

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
TITLE:

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PSOMAS FOR THE FAIRVIEW PARK WEST

BLUFF RESTORATION PROJECT
DEPARTMENT: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
PRESENTED BY: BRIAN GRUNER. PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: KELLY DALTON, FAIRVIEW PARK ADMINISTRATOR (714) 754- 5135
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to PSOMAS to provide engineering design, environmental planning, cultural resource management, and related professional services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project in an amount not to exceed $533,189 for a term of two (2) years from March 17, 2026, to March 16, 2028 with three (3) additional one- year renewal options.

2. Authorize a ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $53,319 for unforeseen costs.

3. Authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) and future amendments to the agreement within City Council authorized limits.

BACKGROUND:

Fairview Park is the City’slargest park, spanning over 200 acres of open space that forms an integral component of the lower Santa Ana River ecological corridor. Within Fairview Park’s208 acres, the site includes sacred tribal ancestral lands, a Nationally Registered Cultural Resource Historic Site, and several distinct habitat communities that provide critical habitat for an array of sensitive, rare, and endangered plant and animal species. The park provides passive and unique recreational opportunities while serving as a critical open space resource within the City. Due to the presence of protected habitats, sensitive cultural resources, and special-status wildlife species, projects within Fairview Park require careful planning, interdisciplinary coordination, and compliance with applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations.

The Fairview Park Master Plan (2008) is currently in the process of being updated, with an anticipated final adoption in summer 2026. The Fairview Park Master Plan establishes long-term goals for protecting, preserving, and enhancing the park’s natural and cultural resources while

Page 1 of 5 ends

618
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
goals for protecting, preserving, and enhancing the park’s natural and cultural resources while allowing for compatible public access and recreation.

As part of these long-term objectives, the City has identified the Fairview Park West Bluff as a priority area, requiring stabilization and ecological restoration. The west bluffs of Fairview Park have been the subject of study since the 1990s due to slope stability and slope erosion concerns, which pose long-term risks to park resources, trails, and public safety if left unaddressed.

In 2023, the City was awarded $2 million dollars from then State Senator David Min to address the Fairview Park West Bluff erosion problem. In 2024, the Parks and Community Services Department and the Public Works Department jointly hired a geotechnical firm to complete a preliminary geotechnical report to characterize the west bluff soils and assess potential alternatives to address erosion issues and slope failures. After a review of the analysis, the City issued a design/planning RFP in mid-2025 and completed the consultant evaluation process in late 2025.

The Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project is intended to address the slope erosion concerns through a comprehensive planning and design effort that integrates geotechnical stability improvements with habitat restoration and resource protection elements. The design project will emphasize solutions that minimize disturbance, restore native plant communities, protect sensitive cultural resources, and maintain the park’s natural character, consistent with the Fairview Park Master Plan and the City’s environmental stewardship goals.

Project Description
The Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project focuses on the evaluation, design, planning, and permitting of stabilization and restoration measures for erosional features along the park’swestern bluffs. The project is a planning and design effort that will culminate in the preparation of construction -ready plans, specifications, and cost estimates for future implementation. The City is seeking professional services that include, but are not limited to:
· Project coordination and management
· Review of existing studies, plans, and technical data · Geotechnical and engineering site design evaluations
· Engineering design for slope stabilization and erosion control · Habitat restoration and revegetation design
· Environmental planning and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation · Resource agency coordination and environmental permitting support · Cultural Resource Management Plan preparation
· Preparation of construction quantities, cost estimates, and bid documents · Public outreach and stakeholder coordination
· Bidding and construction support services
The integrated approach to this project is intended to improve long-term slope stability, reduce

Page 2 of 5 ends

619
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
The integrated approach to this project is intended to improve long-term slope stability, reduce erosion risks, enhance native habitat, and protect sensitive biological and cultural resources, while maintaining public use and trail access for park visitors.

ANALYSIS:

On June 5, 2025, a Request for Proposal (RFP No. 25-23) for professional engineering and environmental planning services was released for the Fairview Park Bluff Restoration Project. In response to the City’s RFP, the City received three (3) proposals from the following firms:
· Dudek
· PSOMAS
· S2SERM
Proposals were reviewed and scored by an interdisciplinary panel of subject matter experts with expertise in environmental planning, civil design, and public works professional services. Proposals were reviewed for compliance and responsiveness to the City’sRequest for Proposals, qualifications of key personnel, method of approach, qualifications and experience of the firm, cost, and references.

Following the initial screening and review of proposals, each of the three consultants were invited to participate in an oral interview to assist in the evaluation process. Based on the composite scores from the evaluation panel, PSOMAS was determined to be the highest rated and most qualified proposer (Table 1).

Table 1: RFP Results
Proposer Total Score Rank
PSOMAS 2687.5 1st
Dudek 2238.55 2nd
S2SERM 2152.1 3rd
Consultant Qualifications
During the evaluation, PSOMAS presented their firm as possessing a thorough understanding of the project and demonstrated extensive experience and technical ability to perform the outlined scope of work in the RFP. PSOMAS has supported several public agencies in Southern California with engineering design, ecological restoration, and related environmental planning support for over three decades. Throughout the evaluation process, PSOMAS also emphasized its team’s strengths in coordinating on similar interdisciplinary and multi-benefit projects, which is of particular value for this project, given the site’sunique planning variables and multi-benefit objectives. In addition, PSOMAS demonstrated comparative strength in its public outreach approach, and emphasized the firm’s careful consideration of stakeholder concerns prior to advancing the project design. This intentional and meaningful community engagement effort will be essential to building and maintaining community support for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project and will ensure the project

Page 3 of 5 ends

620
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
team addresses key community concerns early.

PSOMAS’ proposed approach emphasizes the integration of safety, efficiency, and sensitivity to onsite resources and community feedback in developing the project design. The firm’s ability to integrate multi-disciplinary data, develop long-term preservation strategies, and minimize impacts to existing resources will be critical for the successful design of the project. PSOMAS also demonstrated a strong understanding of the site’senvironmental complexity, and the importance of balancing geotechnical stabilization with habitat restoration and cultural resource protection. This comprehensive and collaborative design philosophy aligns closely with the City’sgoals for long-term stewardship and conservation of Fairview Park’s natural resources.

The evaluation panel determined that PSOMAS’ technical proposal and interview responses distinguished the firm through the strength of its multidisciplinary team, its relevant experience with complex habitat restoration and slope stabilization projects, and its clearly articulated project approach. In particular, PSOMAS emphasized that the final design solution would not be predetermined but instead developed through detailed evaluation of the specific conditions associated with each erosion feature along the west bluff. This adaptive methodology recognizes the unique geotechnical, biological, and cultural resource conditions present at the site and emphasizes tailoring stabilization and restoration strategies accordingly, while also incorporating input from the local community and cultural resource stakeholders. Dudek and S2SERM also submitted qualified proposals demonstrating relevant experience and technical capabilities, however their responses presented more predefined design approaches with less emphasis on an adaptive methodology tailored to site-specific conditions and stakeholder considerations identified for the project. Based on the evaluation criteria established in the RFP, including firm qualifications, team expertise, and project approach, the evaluation panel determined that PSOMAS’proposal represented the highest ranked and most responsive proposal for the project.

Project Funding
In 2023, the City was awarded a significant park and open space investment through state budget allocations from then-Senator Dave Min (current Congressman). As part of the 2022-23 California State Budget, a total of $10M was awarded to the City of Costa Mesa to support park improvements, habitat restoration, and open-space enhancements, including $2.0M allocated towards this project in Fairview Park. This historic grant provides the funding source to support the planning and design phase of the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project, as well as the future construction and implementation phase. After the design amount of $0.59 million is spent, the remaining $1.4 million project balance will be used to fund the construction phase once the design and planning phase is completed by PSOMAS.

The Fairview Park Bluffs Restoration Project was postponed due to the prioritization of several projects, such as the draft Fairview Park Master Plan, the new Mesa Restoration Project, and ongoing restoration efforts. These projects are well underway, and staff is now able to proceed with the Bluffs Restoration Project and is recommending the award of contract to PSOMAS.

ALTERNATIVES:

Staff does not recommend any alternatives at this time.

Page 4 of 5 ends

621
File #: 26-208 Meeting Date: 4/7/2026
FISCAL REVIEW:

Funding for this agreement inclusive of a ten percent (10%) contingency for a total amount of $586,508 is available from the City’sState Grants Fund (231) and was funded by a $2 million grant from the Office of former Senator Dave Min (current U.S. Representative) through the California State Parks Department. The current available project balance is approximately $1.96 million.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed this report and the agreement and approves them as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following City Council Goal:
· Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to PSOMAS to provide engineering design, environmental planning, cultural resource management, and related professional services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project in an amount not to exceed $533,189 for a term of two (2) years from March 17, 2026, to March 16, 2028 with three (3) additional one- year renewal options.

2. Authorize a ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $53,319 for unforeseen costs.

3. Authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) and future amendments to the agreement within City Council authorized limits.

Page 5 of 5 ends

622
1 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025

CITY OF COSTA MESA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH PSOMAS
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 17th day of March 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and PSOMAS, a California corporation (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide professional engineering design, ecological restoration design, and environmental planning services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Project, as more fully described herein; and
B. Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code s ection 37103, and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in Exhibit “A” and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection with the services to be performed; and
D. No official o r em ployee of City ha s a financial interest, within the provisions of sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement.

N
OW, THEREFORE, for and in c onsideration of the m utual c ovenants and c onditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT

1.1. Scope of Services . Consultant shall provide the professional services described in City’s Request for Proposals (RFP 25 -23), attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and Consultant’s Proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” both incorporated herein.

1.2. Professional Practices . All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound professional practices. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement.

1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City . Consultant agrees to perform all the work to the complete satisfaction of the City. Evaluations of the work will be done by the City Manager or his or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet w
ith Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the matters of concern;
ATTACHMENT 1
623
2 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
(b) Requi
re Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory; and/or
(c) Term
inate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

1.4. Warranty.

Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws , including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers’ compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.

1.5. Non-Discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military or veteran status, e xcept as permitted pursuant to s ection 12940 of the Government Code.

1.6. No
n-Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services contemplated by this Agreement.

1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant’s sole cost and expense.

1.8. C
onfidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City, unless required to produce pursuant to legal process. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

2.0. COM

PENSATION AND BILLING

2.1. Com
pensation. Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit “C ,” attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Consultant’s total compensation shall not exceed Five Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Nine 624
3 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
Dollars ($533,189.00).

2.2. Addi
tional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant’s Proposal unless the City Manager or designee, prior to Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.

2.3. Method of B
illing. Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices.

2.4. Rec
ords and Audits. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times from the Effective Date until three (3) years after termination of this Agreement.

3.0. TI

ME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1. Com
mencement and Completion of Work. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, the professional services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Said services shall be performed in strict compliance with the Project Schedule approved by City as set forth in Exhibit “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Project Schedule may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.

3.2. Ex
cusable Delays . Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, pandemics (excluding COVID-19), material shortages, compliance with laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a party (each, a “Force Majeure Event”). If a party experiences a Force Majeure Event, the party shall, within five (5) days of the occurrence of the Force Majeure Event, give written notice to the other party stating the nature of the Force Majeure Event, its anticipated duration and any action being taken to avoid or minimize its effect. Any suspension of performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably required and the party experiencing the Force Majeure Event shall use best efforts without being obligated to incur any material expenditure to remedy its inability to perform; provided, however, if the suspension of performance continues for sixty (60) days after the date of the occurrence and such failure to perform would constitute a material breach of this Agreement in the absence of such Force Majeure Event, the p arties shall meet and discuss in good faith any amendments to this Agreement to permit the other party to exercise its rights under this Agreement. If the parties are not able to agree on such amendments within thirty (30) days and if suspension of performance continues, such other party may terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the party experiencing the Force Majeure Event, in which case neither party shall have any liability to 625
4 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
the other except for those rights and liabilities that accrued prior to the date of termination.

4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION

4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a period of twenty-four (24) months , ending on March 16, 2028, unless previously terminated as provided herein
or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended by three [3] additional one [1]-year periods upon mutual written agreement of both parties.

4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.

The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.

4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including the date of City’s written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the City or in the possession of the Consultant.

4.4. Documents . In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings, maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from Consultant shall be at City’s sole risk and without liability or legal expense to Consultant.

5.0. INSURANCE

5.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California, rated “A,” Class X, or better in the most recent A.M. Best’s Rating Guide, and approved by City:
(a) Com
mercial general liability, including premises -operations, products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) general aggregate. (b) Bus
iness automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars 626
5 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(c) W
orkers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California.

Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers’ compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers’ compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their workers’ compensation insurance policies.
(d) Pr
ofessional errors and omissions (“E&O”) liability insurance with policy limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. If the policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start of the contract work.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years after completion of the work hereunder.

5.2. Endor
sements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Addi
tional insureds: “The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.”
(b) Noti
ce: “Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30) days after written notice is given to City.”
(c) Other
insurance: “The Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the ins urance provided by this policy.”
(d) Any
failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Cons
ultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

5.3. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or 627
6 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
self-insured retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.

5.4. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.

5.5. Non-Limiting. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way, the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.

6.0. GEN

ERAL PROVISIONS

6.1. Enti
re Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing and signed by the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including exhibits to this Agreement.

6.2. Repr
esentatives. The C ity Manager or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

Consul
tant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

6.3. Pr
oject Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.

Consul
tant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.

6.4. Noti
ces. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: (a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery, and (b) 48 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail.

IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY:

Psomas
865 Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
628
7 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
Tel: (626) 808-5427 Tel: (714) 754-5135
Attn: Richard Lewis III Attn: Kelly Dalton
Project Manager
Courtes
y copy to:

City
of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attn: Finance Dept. | Purchasing

6.5. Dru
g-Free Workplace Policy . Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by complying with all provisions set forth in City’s Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein. Consultant’s failure to conform to the requirements set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.

6.6. Attor
neys’ Fees . If litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.

6.7. Gov
erning Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California.

6.8. As
signment. Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant’ s interest in this Agreement without City’s prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this Agreement. Regardless of City ’s consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of Consultant’s obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder for the term of this Agreement.

6.9. Indemni
fication and Hold Harmless. Consultant agrees to indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees to the extent caused by the negligent, reckless or intentionally wrongful performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense reimbursement obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees based upon negligence, recklessness, 629
8 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
or willful misconduct in the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant will reimburse City for any expenditure, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in defending against claims or liabilities to the extent ultimately determined to be caused by the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City’s specifications or Consultant’s Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect.

6.10. Independent C
ontractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.

Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable worker’s compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this paragraph.

6.11 Confli
cts with Independent Contractor. Contractor/consultant’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering into this Agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this Agreement.

6.12. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
630
9 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
Notwi
thstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

6.13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.

6.14. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City. Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from City’s use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports, documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized representative, at no additional cost to the City.

6.15. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that this Agreement and all reports, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code s ection 7920.000 et seq.).

Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California Government Code section 7924.510, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.

6.16. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict-of-interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Government Code sections 81000, et seq.) and Government Code s ection 1090.

During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. 631
10 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025

6.17. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s negligence occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the reasonable satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction.

6.18. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of City while this Agreement is in effect.

6.19. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail . If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.

6.20. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein.

6.21. Binding Effect. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns.

6.22 . No Third Party Beneficiary Rights . This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this Agreement.

6.23 . Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

6.24 . Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement and have had an adequate opportunity to review each and every provision of the Agreement and submit the same to counsel or other consultants for review and comment. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

6.25. A
mendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.

6.26. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of 632
11 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

6.27. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party , is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations.

6.28. C
ounterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.

6.29. Corporate Authority . The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.
[Signatur
es appear on following page.]
633
12 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parti es hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.

CONS
ULTANT
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Signature
__________________________________
[Nam
e and Title]
CIT

Y OF COSTA MESA
__________________________________ D
ate: __________________________
Cecilia Gallardo-Daly
City Manager
ATTEST
:
__________________________________
Br
enda Green
City Clerk

APPROVE
D AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney

APPROVE
D AS TO INSURANCE:
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Ruth Wang
Risk Management
634
13 Psomas
Rev. 1-2025
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Kelly Dalton
Project Manager
DEPA
RTMENTAL APPROVAL:
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Brian Gruner
Parks and Community Services Director

APPROVE
D AS TO PURCHASING:
__________________________________ Date: __________________________

Carol Molina
Finance Director
635

EXHIBIT A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
636
RFP25-23.C06417 .

Page 1 of 41 ends

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR

FAIRVIEW PARK WEST BLUFF RESTORATION
RFP NO. 25-23

PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Released on
June 5, 2025
637
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 2 of 41 ends

Fairview Park Bluff Restoration Project Site
Fairview Park, City of Costa Mesa

638
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 3 of 41 ends

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR

FAIRVIEW PARK WEST BLUFF RESTORATION

The City of Costa Mesa (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) is requesting Proposals from qualified consultants to provide professional engineering design, ecological restoration design, and environmental planning services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project. T he awarded Contractor, (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”) shall be in accordance with the Sample Professional Service Agreement, Appendix B terms, conditions, and scope of work. Prior to submitting a Proposal, Proposers are advised to carefully read the instructions below, including the Sample Professional Service Agreement and any solicitati on appendix/exhibits. The term is expected to have a duration of 2 years with 3 one-year extension options. The City reserves the right to award one or more contracts for this service.

I. GENERAL INFORMATION
The City of Costa Mesa is a general law city, which operates under the council/manager form of government with an annual General Fund budget of over $189.9 million and a total budget of $240.10 million for fiscal year 2024-2025.

The City of Costa Mesa, incorporated in 1953, has an estimated population of 115,000 and has a land area of 16.8 square miles. It is located in the northern coastal area of Orange County, California, and is bordered by the cities of Santa Ana, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Irvine.

The City is a “full service city” providing a wide range of services. These services include: police and fire protection; animal control; emergency medical aid; building safety regulation and inspection; street lighting; land use planning and zoning; housing and community development; maintenance and improvement of streets and related structures; traffic safety maintenance and improvement; and full range of recreational and cultural programs.

The City of Costa Mesa is home of the Segerstrom Center for the Arts, Orange County Fairgrounds, South Coast Repertory Theater and the South Coast Plaza Shopping Center, which is the single largest commercial activity center in the City. The volume of sales generated by South Coast Plaza secures its place as the highest volume regional shopping center in the nation.

The successful Proposer, shall have experience in similar types of services. All Proposers responding to this Request for Proposal (RFP) will be evaluated on the basis of their expertise, prior experience on similar projects, demonstrated competence, ability to meet the requested services, adequate staffing, reference check, understanding of services, cost and responsiveness to the needs and concerns of the City of Costa Mesa.

1. Important Notice: The City has attempted to provide all information available. Please visit the City’s website for supplemental information on Fairview Park :
https://www.costamesaca.gov/community/fairview-park. Please see Cos ta Mesa Municipal Code ,
Title 12, Ch. 12-V section 12-89 for further information on Ballot Measure AA. It is the responsibility of each Proposer to review, evaluate, and, where necessary, request any clarification prior to submission of a Proposal. Proposers are not to contact other City personnel with any 639
RFP25-23.C06417 .

Page 4 of 41 ends

questions or clarifications concerning this Request for Proposal (RFP). Any City response relevant to this RFP other than through or approved by Cit’s Purchasing Department is unauthorized and will be considered invalid.

If clarification or interpretation of this solicitation is considered necessary by City, a written addendum shall be issued, and the information will be posted on PlanetBids. Any interpretation of, or correction to, this solicitation will be made only by addendum issued by the City’s Purchasing Department. It is the responsibility of each Proposer to periodically check PlanetBids website to ensure that it has received and reviewed all addenda to this solicitation. The city will not be responsible for any other explanations, corrections to, or interpretations of the documents, including any oral information.

2. Sche
dule of Events: This Request For Proposal shall be governed by the following schedule:

Release of RFP
Mandatory Job Walk
Deadline for Written Questions
Responses to Questions Posted
Proposals are Due
Interviews (if held)
Approval of Contract
June 5, 2025
June 17, 2025, 9:00 a.m.

June 19, 2025, 5:00 p.m.

June 28, 2025, 5:00 p.m
July 8, 2025, by 10:00 a.m.

July 29-31 2025
October 2025 (tentatively)
**A
ll dates are subject to change at the discretion of the City.

Mandatory Job Walk: A mandatory job walk will be held at 9:00 am on June 17, 2025 at Fairview Park. The job walk will be held to allow for questions and clarification regarding the City’s RFP process, scope of services, and subsequent contract award. The job walk will include an overview of the Fairview Park project site and the west bluff restorat ion design project. The mandatory job walk will begin at the onsite picnic shelter, found at the end of the Fairview Park main parking lot, 2525 Placentia Ave, Costa Mesa CA 92626 (image attached).

3. Proposer’s Minimum Requirements: Interested and qualified Proposers that can demonstrate their ability to successfully provide the required services outlined in Appendix A – Scope of Services, of this RFP are invited to submit a proposal, provided they meet the following requirements. All requirements must be met at the time of the proposal due date. If these requirements are not met, the proposal may not receive further consideration, as determined in the sole discretion of the City. a. The consultant must provide a minimum list of three projects of similar size and scope that have been completed within the last ten years in California. Information of the completed projects should include project name and description, agency or client name along with the person to contact and telephone number, year completed, engineering fee, and project construction cost. b. The c
onsultant shall maintain a local office with a competent representative who can be reached during normal working hours who is authorized to make decisions on matters pertaining to this contract with the City. Office facilities that support daily operations must be within ninety (90) miles of the City.
c. Consul
tants must identify the project manager, and the individual authorized to negotiate the contract on behalf of the consulting firm; and provide an organization chart showing all proposed key project team members.
640
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 5 of 41 ends

3.a. Proposer’s desired qualifications:

The selected firm will have proven experience and knowledge in environmental restoration, geotechnical engineering and slope stabilization, project management related to parks and open spaces, environmental permitting, and public outreach involving various stakeholders. The selected consultant will be comprised of an interdisciplinary team that can effectively plan and design a multi-benefit project that achieves both slope stabilization and ecological restoration, in addition to other community benefits. The consultant will plan and develop an integrated design that draws upon disciplines including, but not limited to:
• Habitat restoration of natural Southern California landscapes including coastal sage scrub, coastal bluff scrub, and other native vegetation communities.

Consultant shall have experience successfully implementing large (>5 ac.) habitat restoration projects of Southern California vegetation communities. • Geotechnical engineering of bluffs and other natural slope features. • Civil Engineering.
• Landscape Architecture.
• Archeology and cultural resources management.
• Wildlife biology and regulations pertaining to special-status biological resources. • CEQA and environmental documentation.

Consultants shall also have the following qualifications:
• Experience in public engagement and collaboration
• The technical qualifications to perform the environmental tasks outlined in the scope of work
• Strong graphic communication and clear, concise writing style • A dedicated team with a single project manager to guide the project to conclusion

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND PROVISIONS

1. Proposal Format Guidelines: Interested entities or contractors are to provide the City of Costa Mesa with a thorough Proposal using the following guidelines: Proposal should be typed and should contain no more than 25 typed pages using a 12- point font size, including cover letter, Index/Table of Contents, tables, charts, and graphic exhibits, but excluding resumes of key people and pricing forms. Each Proposal will adhere to the following order and content of sections. Proposal should be straightforward, concise and provide “layman” explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and c lear description of the offer. Proposals which appear unrealistic in terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this contract may be rejected. The following Proposal sections are to be included in the Proposer’s response:
• Cover Letter: A
cover letter, not to exceed two pages in length, should summarize key elements of the Proposal. An individual authorized to bind the Contractor must sign the letter. Indicate the address and telephone number of the contractor’s office located nearest 641
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 6 of 41 ends

to Costa Mesa, California, and the office from which the project will be managed. And include proposed working relationship among the offering agency and subcontractors, if applicable.

• Background and Project Summary Section: The Background and Project Summary Section should describe your understanding of the City, the work to be done, and the objectives to be accomplished. Refer to Scope of Services, Appendix A of this RFP.

• Project Approach and Methodol ogy: Provide a detailed description of the approach and methodology that will be used to fulfill each requirement listed in the Scope of Services of this RFP. The section should include:

1. Describes familiarity of project and demonstrates understanding of work and pr
oject objectives moving forward.

2. Detailed description of efforts your firm will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Services " section.Identifies the project’s potential issues and response to them.

3. Proposers are encouraged to provide additional innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the service that will maximize efficient, safe, and cost - effective operations or increased performance capabilities. • Project S
chedule: Provide a detailed project schedule, identifying all tasks and deliverables to be performed, durations for each task, and overall time of completion. • Qualifications & Experience of t he Firm: Describe the qualifications and experience of the organization or entity performing services/projects that are similar in size and scope to demonstrate competence to perform these services. Information shall include:

1. Rel
evant experience, specific qualifications, and technical expertise of the firm and sub-consultants to provide design services.

2. Submit a description of the organization’s qualifications, experience and abilities that make it uniquely capable to provide the services specified in the Scope of Work.

3. If the owner is a corporation please provide: Name of corporation, corporate office street address, city, state, and zip code, state where incorporated, date of incorporation, first and last name of officers, local office address, city, state & zip, and the date local office opened its doors for business.

4. If the owner is a partnership or joint venture, please provide: Name of partnership or joint venture, principal office street address, city, state, and zip code, state of organization, date of organization, first and last name of general partner(s), local office address, city, state, and zip code, and date local office opened its doors for.

5. Provide a list of current and previous contracts similar to the requirements for this project in Costa Mesa, including all public agencies served (if any). For each, provide a brief description of the scope of work performed, the length of time you have been providing services, and the name, title, and telephone number of the person who may be contacted regarding your organization’s service record. 642
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 7 of 41 ends

• Financial Capacity: The City is concerned about proposers’ financial capability to perform, and therefore, is requesting copies of audited financials from the past three years to allow an evaluation of firm’s financial capabilities.

• Key Personnel: I t is essential that the Proposer provide adequate experienced personnel, capable of and devoted to the successful accomplishment of work to be performed under this contract. The Proposer must agree to assign specific individuals to the key positions.

o I
dentify the members of the staff who would be assigned to act for Proposer’s firm in key management and filed positions providing the services described in the Proposal, and the functions to be performed by each.

o Include resumes or curriculum vitae of each such staff member, including name, position, telephone number, email address, education, and years and type of relevant experience. Describe for each such person, the relevant role and functions for each project.

Cost Proposal: Pr
ovide a not-to-exceed fee schedule/pricing information for the project including identifying the specific assigned personnel, their hourly rates and their number of hours, and the cost for each work task/deliverable as described in the Scope of Services. If work tasks or deliverable are proposed that are not specifically listed in the City’s Scope of Services, please identify those costs as separate and optional. Proposals shall be valid for a minimum of 180 days following submission.

The C
ost proposal shall i nclude a $10,000 allowance for permit fees and approved reimbursables.

• Disclosure: Please disclose any and all past or current business and personal relationships with any current Costa Mesa elected official, appointed official, City employee, or family member of any current Costa Mesa elected official, appointed official, or City employee. Any past or current business relationship may not disqualify the firm from consideration.

• Sample Professional Service Agreement: T
he firm selected by the City will be required to
execute a Professional Service Agreement with the City. A sample of the Agreement is enclosed as Appendix B but may be modified to suit the specific services and needs of the City. If a Proposer has any exceptions or conditions to the Agreement, these must be submitted for consideration with the Proposal. Otherwise, the Proposer will be deemed to have accepted the form of Agreement.
• Checklist of Forms to Accompany Proposal: As
a convenience to Proposers, following is
a list of the forms, Appendix C included in this RFP, which should be included with Proposals:

1. Vend
or Application Form

2. Company Profile & References

3. Ex Parte Communications Certificate

4. Disclosure of Government Positions

5. Disqualifications Questionnaire

6. Bidder/Applicant/Contractor Campaign Contribution
643
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 8 of 41 ends

2. Process for Submitting Proposals:
• Content of Proposal: T he Proposal must be submitted using the format as indicated in the Proposal format guidelines.

• Preparation of Proposal: E ach Proposal shall be prepared simply and economically, avoiding the use of elaborate promotional material beyond those sufficient to provide a complete, accurate and reliable presentation.

• Cost for Preparing Proposal: The cost for developing the Proposal is the sole responsibility of the Proposer. All Proposals submitted become the property of the City. Cost proposal shall be submitted in a separate file. The cost proposal is confidential and will be unsealed after all proposals have been reviewed, and the most qualified consultant has been selected.

Proposals shall be valid for a minimum of 180 days following submission.

• Forms to Accompany Proposal: A
ppendix C forms shall be attached at the end of the
Proposal with the exception of the Cost Proposal which shall be submitted in a separate file.

• Number of Proposals: Submit one (1) PDF file format copy of your technical proposal in sufficient detail for thorough evaluation and comparative analysis, and (1) PDF file format copy of your cost proposal.

• Submission of Proposals:

Complete written Proposals must be submitted electronically in PDF file format via the planetbids.com website not later than 10 :00 a.m. (P.S.T) on July 8, 2025. Proposals will not be accepted after this deadline. Proposals received after the scheduled closing time will not be accepted. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Proposer to see that the proposal is received in proper time. Faxed or e- mailed Proposals will not be accepted. NO EXCEPTIONS.

• Inquiries: Questions about this RFP must be posted in the Q & A tab on Planetbids no later than June 19, 2025 at 5:00 P.M. The City reserves the right not to answer all questions.

The C
ity reserves the right to amend or supplement this RFP prior to the Proposal due date.

All addendum(s), responses to questions received, and additional information will be posted to the Costa Mesa Procurement Registry, Costa Mesa-Official City Web Site, Business-Bids & RFP's. Proposers should check this web page daily for new information.

From the date that this RFP is issued until a firm or entity is selected and the selection is announced, firms or public entities are not allowed to communicate outside the process set forth in this RFP with any City employee other than the contracting officer listed above regarding this RFP. The City reserves the right to reject any Proposal for violation of this provision. No questions other than posted on Planetbids will be accepted, and no response other than written will be binding upon the City.

• Conditions for Proposal Acceptance:

This RFP does not commit the City to award a
contract or to pay any costs incurred for any services. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to accept or reject any or all Proposals received as a result of this RFP, to negotiate with any qualified source(s), or to cancel this RFP in part or in its entirety. The City may waive 644
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 9 of 41 ends

any irregularity in any Proposal. All Proposals will become the property of the City of Costa Mesa, USA. If any proprietary information is contained in the Proposal, it should be clearly identified.

• Insurance & W-9 R
equirements: Upon recommendation of contract award, Contractor will be required to submit the following documents with ten (10) days of City notification, unless otherwise specified in the solicitation:

 Ins
urance - City requires that licensees, lessees, and vendors have an approved Certificate of Insurance (not a declaration or policy) or proof of legal self-insurance on file with the City for the issuance of a permit or contract. Within ten (10) consecutive calendar days of award of contract, successful Bidder must furnish the City with the Certificates of Insurance proving coverage as specified in the sample contract.

 W-9 – Current signed form W -9 (Taxpayer Identification Umber & Certification) which includes Contractor’s legal business name(s).

3. Evaluation Criteria: The City’s evaluation and selection process will be conducted in accordance with Chapter V, Article 2 of the City's Municipal Code (Code). This project will be awarded based on a Qualifications Based Selection process. In accordance with the Code, the responsive responsible proposer shall be determined based on evaluation of qualitative factors.

At all times during the evaluation process, the following criteria will be used. Sub-criteria are not necessarily listed in order of importance. Additional sub-criteria that logically fit within a particular evaluation criteria may also be considered even if not specified below.

1. Project Approach & Methodology ------- 35%

2. Qualifications & Experience of Firm ------- 25%

3. Key Personnel ---- 30%

4. Cost---- 10%

4. Evaluation of Proposals and Selection Process: In accordance with its Municipal Code, the City will adhere to the following procedures in evaluating Proposals. An Evaluation Committee, which may include members of the City's staff and possibly one or more outside experts, will screen and review all Proposals according to the weighted criteria set forth above.

While price is one basic factor for award, it is not the sole consideration.

A. Responsiveness Screening :

Proposals will first be screened to ensure
responsiveness to the RFP. The City may reject as non-responsive any Proposal that does not include the documents required to be submitted by this RFP. At any time during the evaluation process, the City reserves the right to request clarifications or additional information from any or all Proposers regarding their Proposals.

B. Initial Proposal Review:

The Committee will initially review and score all responsive written Proposals based upon the Evaluation Criteria set forth above. The Committee may also contact Proposer's references. Proposals that receive the highest evaluation 645
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 10 of 41 ends

scores may be invited to the next stage of the evaluation process. The City may reject any Proposal in which a Proposer’s approach or qualifications are not considered acceptable by the City. An unacceptable Proposal is one that would have to be substantially rewritten to make it acceptable. The City may conclude the evaluation process at this point and recommend award to the highest ranked consultant or proceed to interview the highest ranked consultants.

C. Interviews, Reference Checks, Revised Proposals, Discussions: Following the initial screening and review of Proposals, the Proposers included in this stage of the evaluation process may be invited to participate in an oral interview. Interviews, if held, are tentatively scheduled for the week of July 29- 31, 2025 and will be conducted at City of Costa Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 9262 6 or virtually at the discretion of the City. The dates are subject to change. The individual(s) from Proposer's organization that will be directly responsible for carrying out the contract, if awarded, should be present at the oral interview. The oral interview may, but is not required to, use a written question/answer format for the purpose of clarifying the intent of any portions of the Proposal.

In
addition to conducting an oral interview, the City may during this stage of the evaluation process also contact and evaluate the Proposer’s references, contact any Proposer to clarify any response or request revised or additional information, contact any current users of a Proposer’s services, solicit information from any available source concerning any aspect of a Proposal, and seek and review any other information deemed pertinent to the evaluation process.

Following conclusion of this stage of the evaluation process, the Committee will again rank all Proposers according to the evaluation criteria set forth above. The Committee may conclude the evaluation process at this point and make a recommendation for award. Once the highest ranked consultant is identified, t he City will open the Cost Proposal and enter negotiations.

Recommendation for award is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final contract terms. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Proposers unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully within a time period determined by the City, the City may terminate negotiations and commence negotiations with the next highest scoring Proposer or withdraw the RFP.

5. Protests: Failure to comply with the rules set forth herein may result in rejection of the protest. Any proposals awarded pursuant to the formal procurement procedure set forth in the Proposal procedure may be appealed in accordance with the following procedure:

• The Proposer shall file the written notice of appeal with the purchasing officer at least ten (10) working days prior to proposal award date specified in the notice of recommendation to award.
• The written notice of appeal must include specifics as to the nature of the appeal. • The Proposer must provide any and all documentation to support the appeal. • The purchasing officer will respond in writing to the Proposer within five (5) working days.
646
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 11 of 41 ends

• In the event the appeal is denied by the purchasing officer, the Proposer may appeal the purchasing officer’s ruling to the city council at the next available council meeting.

6. Accuracy of Proposals: Proposers shall take all responsibility for any errors or omissions in their Proposals. Any discrepancies in numbers or calculations shall be interpreted to reflect the cost to the City.

If prior to contract award, a Proposer discovers a mistake in their Proposal which renders the Proposal unwilling to perform under any resulting contract, the Proposer must immediately notify the facilitator and request to withdraw the Proposal. It shall be solely within the City's discretion as to whether withdrawal will be permitted. If the solicitation contemplated evaluation and award of "all or none" of the items, then any withdrawal must be for the entire Proposal. If the solicitation provided for evaluation and award on a line item or combination of items basis, the City may consider permitting withdrawal of specific line item(s) or combination of items.

7. Responsibility of Proposers: The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by potential Contractors in the preparation or submission of their Proposals. Pre- contractual expenses are not to be included in the Contractor’s Pricing Sheet. Pre- contractual expenses are defined as , including but not limited to, expenses incurred by Proposer in:

• Preparing Proposal in response to this RFP.
• Submitting that Proposal to the City;
• Negotiating with the City any matter related to the Proposal; and, • Any other expenses incurred by the Proposer prior to the date of the award and execution, if any, of the contract.

8. Confidentiality: The California Public Records Act (Cal. Govt. Code Sections 6250 et seq.) mandates public access to government records. Therefore, unless information is exempt from disclosure by law, the content of any request for explanation, exception, or substitution, response to this RFP, protest, or any other written communication between the City and Proposer, shall be available to the public. The City intends to release all public portions of the Proposals following the evaluation process at such time as a recommendation is made to the City Council.

If Proposer believes any communication contains trade secrets or other proprietary information that the Proposer believes would cause substantial injury to the Proposer’s competitive position if disclosed, the Proposer shall request that the City withhold from disclosure the proprietary information by marking each page containing such proprietary information as confidential.

Proposer may not designate its entire Proposal as confidential nor designate its Price Proposal as confidential.

Submission of a Proposal shall indicate that, if Proposer requests that the City withhold from disclosure information identified as confidential, and the City complies with the Proposer’s request, Proposer shall assume all responsibility for any challenges resulting from the non- disclosure, indemnify and hold harmless the City from and against all damages (including but not limited to attorney’s fees and costs that may be awarded to the party requesting the Proposer information), and pay any and all costs and expenses related to the withholding of Proposer information. Proposer shall not make a claim, sue, or maintain any legal action against the City or its directors, officers, employees, or agents concerning the disclosure, or withholding from 647
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 12 of 41 ends

disclosure, of any Proposer information. If Proposer does not request that the City withhold from disclosure information identified as confidential, the City shall have no obligation to withhold the information from disclosure and may release the information sought without any liability to the City.

9. Ex Parte Communications: Proposers and Proposers’ representatives should not communicate with the City Council members about this RFP. In addition, Proposers and Proposers’ representatives should not communicate outside the procedures set forth in this RFP with an officer, employee, or agent of the City, including any member of the evaluation panel, with the exception of the RFP Facilitator, regarding this RFP until after Contract Award.

Proposers and their representatives are not prohibited, however, from making oral statements or presentations in public to one or more representatives of the City during a public meeting.

A "Proposer" or "Proposer's representative" includes all of the Proposer's employees, officers, directors, consultants and agents, any subcontractors or suppliers listed in the Proposer's Proposal, and any individual or entity who has been requested by the Proposer to contact the City on the Proposer's behalf. Proposers shall include the Ex Parte Communications Form, Appendix C with their Proposals certifying that they have not had or directed prohibited communications as described in this section.

10. Conflict of Interest: The Proposer warrants and represents that it presently has no interest and agrees that it will not acquire any interest which would present a conflict of interest under California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq., or Sections 87100 et seq., during the performance of services under any Agreement awarded. The Proposer further covenants that it will not knowingly employ any person having such an interest in the performance of any Agreement awarded. Violation of this provision may result in any Agreement awarded being deemed void and unenforceable.

11. Disclosure of Governmental Position: In order to analyze possible conflicts that might prevent a Proposer from acting on behalf of the City, the City requires that all Proposers disclose in their Proposals any positions that they hold as directors, officers, or employees of any governmental entity. Additional disclosure may be required prior to contract award or during the term of the contract. Each Proposer shall disclose whether any owner or employee of the firm currently hold positions as elected or appointed officials, directors, officers, or employees of a governmental entity or held such positions in the past twelve months using the attached Disclosure of Government Positions Form, Appendix C.

12. Conditions to Agreement: The selected Proposer will execute a Professional Service Agreement for Services with the City describing the Scope of Services to be performed, the schedule for completion of the services, compensation, and other pertinent provisions. The contract shall follow the sample form of Agreement provided as Appendix B to this RFP, which will be modified by the City to include federal requirements.

All Proposers are directed to particularly review the indemnification and insurance requirements set forth in the sample A greement. The terms of the agreement, including insurance requirements have been mandated by the City and can be modified only if extraordinary circumstances exist.
648
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 13 of 41 ends

Submittal of a Proposal shall be deemed acceptance of all the terms set forth in this RFP and the sample agreement for services unless the Proposer includes with its Proposal, in writing, any conditions or exceptions requested by the Proposer to the proposed Agreement.

13. Disqualification Questionnaire: Proposers shall complete and submit, under penalty of perjury, a standard form of questionnaire inquiring whether a Proposer, any officer of a proposer, or any employee of a Proposer who has a proprietary interest in the Proposer, has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from proposing on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or safety regulation and if so, to explain the circumstances. A Proposal may be rejected on the basis of a Proposer, any officer or employee of such Proposer, having been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from proposing on, or completing a federal, state, or local project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation, Appendix C.

14. Standard Terms and Conditions: The City reserves the right to amend or supplement this RFP prior to the Proposal due date. All addendum(s) and additional information will be posted via PlanetBids. Proposers should check this web page daily for new information.

ATTACHMENTS:

− APPENDIX A – SCOPE OF SERVICES
− APPENDIX B – SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
− APPENDIX C- REQUIRED FORMS
− APPENDIX D – PROJECT AREA
− APPENDIX E – MAPPED GULLIES/PRIORITY AREAS SUBJECT OF REPAIRS −
• APPENDIX F – Geotechnical Investigation Report for Fairview Park Slope Restoration (dated June 7, 2024, prepared by Fenagh Engineering and Testing)

649
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 14 of 41 ends

APPENDIX A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR

FAIRVIEW PARK WEST BLUFF RESTORATION

The Consultant is tasked with performing comprehensive design and environmental planning services and developing a comprehensive set of plans, specifications, and estimates for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration project (“project”). The project shall be informed by existing site conditions, Fairview Park Master Plan, Ballot Measure AA, the 2023 Vegetation Map and Restoration Opportunities Report, other technical reports provided by the City, and the consultant’s technical expertise in various fields. The Consultant will address geotechnical and slope stability, erosion, and ecological considerations, while developing solutions that ensure minimal adverse impacts on existing resources.

Using information gathered from site evaluations and the City-provided technical reports, the consultant shall assess the Fairview Park west bluff geological features according to severity of erosion and degree of risk to nearby trails and other essential park features, and develop a design solution that improves the geotechnical stability of the west bluffs. Given the site’s environmental sensitivity and various sensitive resources known to be present, consultant shall rely on design elements and stabilization solutions that avoid and minimize adverse impacts to existing resources where feasible.

Based on the results of the consultant’s technical evaluations, consultant shall prepare a detailed design and implementation plan. The consultant will draw upon both biological resources protection requirements and cultural resources preservation standards in preparing the design. The consultant shall develop an integrated engineering and ecological restoration solution that supports the long-term safety and integrity of the Fairview Park west bluffs, while preserving the site’s natural character and environmental resources.

Consultants are encouraged to present innovative concepts to achieve the objectives set forth in the Request for Proposal (RFP). The work described in this section is considered to be the minimum required to complete this process. In their proposals, consultants may propose additional tasks or revisions to this scope that lead to the best process and results for the project.

The primary goals and objectives of the project are as follows:
• Ensure the geotechnical stability of the west bluffs. • Mitigate erosion and associated risks to park trails and other features. • Restore and enhance the ecological integrity of the Fairview Park West Bluffs. • Develop sustainable solutions for the west bluffs that promote native habitat for wildlife and minimize environmental impact.

In addition to achieving geotechnical stabilization to preserve the longevity and safety of the 650
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 15 of 41 ends

west bluff trails, the project is also intended to accomplish ecological restoration and enhancement. In developing the design, the consultant’s restoration plan shall identify and prioritize the removal of existing stands of invasive vegetation along the west bluffs. The consultant will develop a restoration plan to remove existing invasive and non-native vegetation, and revegetate these areas with native species of coastal bluff scrub and other ecologically appropriate vegetation communities. Plant palettes for the habitat restoration areas shall be consistent with the City’s Fairview Park Master Plan and habitat restoration opportunities identified therein.

TASK 1. PROJECT COORDINATION AND DOCUMENT REVIEW

This task will include an initial kickoff meeting and regular coordination and meetings with City staff throughout the design development process. In addition, this task will involve coordination between consultant’s various technical disciplines to ensure an integrated design process.

Consultant will thoroughly review and evaluate existing site conditions and available documentation pertinent to the project site. Consultant shall review applicable sections of the following materials, at a minimum:
• Geotechnical Investigation Report for Fairview Park Slope Restoration (dated June 7, 2024, prepared by Fenagh Engineering and Testing)
• Fairview Park Master Plan (last updated in 2008) and Fairview Park Negative Declaration dated 1997
• Engineering Evaluation of the Westerly Slope at Fairview Park (dated March 2003 prepared by Dudek and Associates)
• Ballot Measure AA
• Other biological and technical reports will be made available to the selected consultant.

TASK 2. SITE DESIGN EVALUATIONS

This item of work shall include visually surveying site to establish design constraints and existing conditions including landmarks, adjacent uses, site edges, views and orientation, site topography, and circulation systems. The slope stabilization and restoration design is expected to include a combination of bioengineered and earthwork restoration solutions, considering remedial grading and ecologically suitable engineered fill material as part of the proposed solutions. Consultant shall consider all applicable engineering and environmental design constraints, including but not limited to:

• Existing and future infrastructure.
• Soil conditions.
• Site circulation (pedestrian and service vehicular access). • Sensitive environmental features and biological resources. • Topography.
• Drainage systems.
• A djacent land uses, parks (Talbert Regional Park), structures, and residential areas. • On-site and off-site uses.
651
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 16 of 41 ends

• Utilities.

In conducting the site design evaluations, consultant shall prepare a sustainable earthwork and restoration design solution to ensure the geotechnical stability of the west bluffs, and account for:

• Drainage overtopping the bluff edge.
• Collapse of near-vertical bluffs.
• Highly erodible soil layers.
• B urrowing and bioturbation and stability vulnerabilities. • Encouragement of native, drought-tolerant deep-rooted species on erosional faces. • D esign solutions that avoid and minimize adverse impacts to existing sensitive resources.
• Bluff safety during construction and public safety for trail users. • Coordination with neighborhood residents of potential project impacts. • Limitations of use for heavy equipment and tools.
• Temporary trail closures for the duration of construction.

TASK 3. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

Consultant will prepare and provide a comprehensive set of plans for the City’s review and comments at stages including preliminary design (30%), 60%, 90%, and 100% design submittals. The design shall prepare civil and landscape architectural plans in sufficient detail for contractors to construct the project during the (future) implementation phase. The consultant will draw upon biological resources and cultural resources preservation standards, and knowledge of ecological restoration in preparing a sustainable design solution.

The design development process shall include the following:
• Geotechnical analyses
• Utilities.
• Existing cultural and archeological resources assessment • Slope stabilization and restoration design
• Site preparation details.
• Excavation plan.
• Remedial grading.
• Engineered fill sections.
• Compaction methods and equipment specifications.
• Slope reinforcement plan.
• Drainage plan.
• Erosion control plan.

Consultant shall also develop an ecologically appropriate habitat restoration design and implementation plan. The habitat restoration implementation plan shall be prepared by a qualified restoration ecologist with experience in managing large (>5 ac.) restoration projects in Southern California vegetation communities. The habitat restoration design shall include the 652
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 17 of 41 ends

following items, at a minimum:
• P lant palettes and details
• Seed mixes and seed installation methods
• Habitat restoration monitoring and maintenance plan
• Irrigation during establishment period and temporary irrigation plan. • The consultant shall also establish success criteria for the habitat restoration and enhancement areas, and any other performance-based standards to be met during the implementation phase.

Construction drawings and specifications shall be signed and stamped by the licensed engineer and/or landscape architect, and sub-consultants in their respective specialty disciplines.

Plans and specifications shall comply with standard drawings and specifications of the City of Costa Mesa and other agencies as applicable.

All construction drawings shall be provided to the City in both hard copy and electronic format.

TASK 4. PREPARATION OF QUANTITIES AND COST ESTIMATES

The consultant will provide itemized preliminary and final construction quantity and cost estimates during the design process. A preliminary cost estimate shall be prepared at the 30% design stage, and detailed cost estimates shall be provided at 60%, 90%, and 100% design submittals and a final estimate upon final submittal.

The consultant shall provide preliminary cost estimates for at least two (2) alternatives during the schematic design phase.

TASK 5. RESOURCE CONSULTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING

The consultant shall provide all services necessary to determine potential impact to sensitive resources, consult with regulatory agencies and obtain approvals from all regulatory authorities and wildlife agencies to construct and implement the project. This will include preparing and submitting documents to the appropriate governing agencies for review, meetings and consultation with applicable regulatory authorities and the City, and obtaining all approvals and permits necessary to construct the project.

TASK 6. CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Consultant shall include all services necessary to develop a cultural resource management plan for the project, which is to be implemented during the subsequent phase of project implementation. The cultural resource management plan shall account forcultural resource monitoring needs during specific phases and activities of project implementation. In addition, this task shall include any anticipated coordination with tribal organizations that may be necessary during the course of project planning and design. Consultant’s cultural resources management plan shall adhere to all applicable cultural and historical resources preservation requirements including the National Historic Preservation Act and other applicable standards. 653
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 18 of 41 ends

The cultural resource management plan shall be developed under the direction of a Qualified Archeologist, and shall account for the following items, as applicable.

• Review of Applicable Records and Site Inventory
• Archeological Surveys
• Archeological Monitoring
• Native American Monitoring
• Tribal Consultation and Facilitation
• Cultural Resources Avoidance and Protection Measures
• Worker Training Program
• Cultural Resource Discovery Procedures

TASK 7. FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND BID PACKAGE

PREPARATION

Based on the approved design development documents, the consultant shall prepare the working drawings and specifications which shall set forth and prescribe in detail the work to be done by the contractor including materials, workmanship, finishes, and equipment required for to fulfill the design in accordance with the geotechnical, civil, landscape architectural, and ecological restoration plans. Construction drawings and specifications shall be signed and stamped by the licensed engineer and sub-consultants in their respective specialties.

Consultant shall conduct in-house constructability review.

The consultant shall process the construction documents for the review and approval of the City’s Parks and Community Services Department and Public Works Department, answer plan check comments, and if necessary, revise construction documents and obtain any required permits or approvals from outside agencies. The consultant shall prepare Final Plans, Cost Estimate and Technical Specifications to be used for the City Bid Package.

The consultant shall consider all applicable design constraints and address all items to prepare a technically defensible design. The final design and construction documents shall include all details and plans necessary to construct the project, including:
• Geotechnical analyses
• Utilities.
• Existing cultural and archeological resources assessment • Slope stabilization and restoration design
• Site preparation details.
• Excavation plan.
• Remedial grading.
• Engineered fill sections.
• Compaction methods and equipment specifications.
• Slope reinforcement plan.
• Drainage plan.
• Erosion control plan.
654
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 19 of 41 ends

• Survey plans and CAD files.
• Fencing and signage plan.
• Trail detour plan.
• Construction staging and access plan.
• Equipment details and technical methods.
• Engineered fill material specifications.
• Slope reinforcement materials, alternatives, and specifications. • Cost estimates for each of the project alternatives.
• Detailed Technical Specifications including Special Provisions. Copies of Standard General Provisions and Construction Contract Agreement will be supplied by the City for incorporation into construction documents. A description for each bid item will be required.
• Habitat Restoration Final Design, including detailed implementation plan and restoration maintenance and monitoring plan.

Consultant shall also develop a long-term maintenance and monitoring plan for the west bluff restoration project to ensure the longevity of the stabilization solution and success of the ecological restoration project beyond the establishment period.

TASK 8. CEQA AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION

The selected consultant shall:
• Prepare a project description in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• Determine the appropriate level of CEQA environmental analysis and documentation for the project.
• Prepare an applicable environmental document.
• P repare all associated notices and findings in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) necessary to analyze the environmental impacts of the project, and define mitigation and monitoring responsibilities. • Provide response to comments after circulating the CEQA document for public review. • Consult with responsible and trustee agencies as required and obtain all necessary permits and agency approvals needed to implement the project.

TASK 9. PUBLIC OUTREACH

Consultant shall prepare and lead a minimum of three (3) public outreach meetings at appropriate stages of the project planning and design process. Consultant shall be familiar with the City’s governance structure for Fairview Park including the Fairview Park Steering Committee and Costa Mesa Ballot Measure AA. Public outreach meetings may include a combination of general outreach meetings for the project, Fairview Park Steering Committee meetings, on-site informational sessions, or meetings to the Costa Mesa City Council or Parks and Community Services Commission. Consultant will coordinate with City staff in planning and scheduling the public outreach meetings for the project. The consultant shall use the 655
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 20 of 41 ends

public outreach sessions as opportunities to share information about the project, address questions and concerns, and educate the community about the long-term benefits to be realized by the project. Consultant shall include hours appropriate hours and expenses to prepare applicable presentation materials for meetings, and conduct a presentation at each of the public outreach meeting sessions.

TASK 10. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

Consultant will attend one bid coordination meeting and prepare technical specifications, project appendices, bid form and architect’s estimate. Attend two pre-bid meetings and provide full size exhibits for use in the pre-bid meeting presentations. During the bid process, the architect shall be responsible for preparing addenda, clarifying the construction documents, answering bidder’s questions, issuing revised bid form, plans, exhibits, and technical specifications as required. During the construction phase, the architect and his sub- consultants shall review / approve submittals and respond to contractor’s Requests for Information (RFIs), provide review and input on contractor change order requests, attend weekly construction progress meetings, attend to final walk-through and punch list preparation and prepare final As-Builts.

EXAMINATION OF SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL

Each consultant must fully know all project conditions and the effort required to successfully complete the project. Failure to do so will not relieve the selected consultant of the obligations to carry out the contract.

656
RFP25-23.C06417.

Page 33 of 41 ends

APPENDIX C
FORMS

Vendor Application Form
Ex Parte Communications Certification
Disclosure of Government Positions
Disqualification Questionnaire
Company Profile & References
Bidder/Applicant/Contractor Campaign Contribution

657

EXHIBIT B

CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL

658
Proposal | 07.15.2025
Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration
RFP No. 25-23

CITY OF COSTA MESA
659
Table of Contents
1 1 BACKGROUND & PROJECT SUMMARY 4
2 PROJECT APPROACH & METHODOLOGY 5
3 PROJECT SCHEDULE 12
4 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE 13
5 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 21
6 KEY PERSONNEL 22
7 COST PROPOSAL SUBMITTED SEPARATEL Y 24
8 DISCLOSURE 25
9 SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
AGREEMENT 26
COVER LETTER 2

APPENDIX
A - Key Personnel Resumes A-1
B - Forms B-1
Psomas | City of Costa Mesa - Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration RFP No. 25-23 660
July 15, 2025
Mike Fuentes
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive, 1st Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Subject: Proposal for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration Dear Mr. Fuentes and Selection Committee:

Psomas is excited about the prospect of providing professional engineering design, ecological restoration design, and environmental planning services for the Fairview Park West Bluff Restoration for the City of Costa Mesa. We believe we have assembled an exemplary team of professionals who can effectively plan and design a multi-benefit project that achieves both slope stabilization and ecological restoration, as well as other community benefits. In addition to Psomas’ experienced engineering, resource management, and environmental planning teams, our team includes the geotechnical professionals at GMU Engineers & Geologists (GMU) to document existing conditions, establish design constraints, and specify geotechnical resources. We have also included Capo Projects Group on the team to support the task of construction quantity and cost estimates.

We believe we are aptly suited to provide the services identified in the Request for Proposal:
f Psomas has maintained long-term relationships with public sector agencies in the immediate vicinity of Fairview Park for over 30 years.
f Psomas is a multi-disciplinary firm with extensive experience working on award-winning resource management and habitat restoration projects for public sector clients in Orange County and adjacent municipalities.
f Psomas has designed and monitored multiple native habitat mitigation/restoration projects along the Southern California coast that were signed-off by the natural resource agencies in a timely manner—including sites with challenging soils/slope conditions, under rigorous performance standards specified in project permits.
f Psomas staff have longstanding site familiarity and extensive knowledge of the jurisdictions, resources, and opportunities and constraints within the Park and surrounding areas. Our tested practices, combined with our local office location for efficiency and responsiveness, make our team uniquely qualified for this effort.

Balancing the Natural and Built Environment
5 Hutton Centre Drive
Suite 300
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Tel 71 4.751.7373
Fax 7 14.545.8883
www.Psomas.com 661
Mike Fuentes
July 15, 2025

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting