Agenda packet — Cotati City Council, October 25, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA

JOINT MEETING OF THE COTATI CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE FORMER COTATI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday October 25, 2022
6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING
Pursuant to AB 361 (2021), Teleconference Restrictions of the Brown Act Have Been Suspended, as Well as the Requirement to Provide a Physical Location for Members of the Public to Participate in the Meeting.

Cotati City Council and Planning Commission Meetings will be conducted virtually through Zoom Online video conferencing, and will still be available to watch or listen in the following ways:

1. Using the following online livestream meeting portal link: http://cotaticityca.iqm2.com/citizens/default.aspx;

2. Cable T.V. Broadcast, local channel 28
Members of the public can participate in the meeting online by selecting “Join a Meeting” at zoom.us. The credentials for joining the meeting are provided below:

Webinar ID: 857 8231 7587
Passcode: 818226
If you do not have the ability to join online, but would like to participate in the meeting, you can call into the meeting using your telephone, by dialing one of the following numbers and entering the meeting credentials:
+1 (669) 900-6833 or +1 (346) 248-7799 or +1 (253) 215-8782 or +1 (301) 715-8592 or +1 (312) 626-6799 or +1 (929) 436-2866
Attendees may join the meeting any time after 5:45pm. Attendees will be muted until they are called upon for Public Comment. To make a public comment, use the “raise hand” icon on your smart device or desktop computer, or dial *9 if you are using just your telephone. Please listen carefully for the Mayor or City Clerk to address you by name (or phone number) and for the audible Zoom notification that you have been unmuted. Once you begin your public comment, your three minutes will begin.

If you would prefer to submit your public comment in writing, please email your comments to [email protected]. If you are commenting on a specific agenda item or items, please state the agenda item number(s) in the subject line of the email. All comments received via email will be provided to the City Council or Planning Commission in writing and included as part of the record of the meeting. ###
The Cotati City Council welcomes you to its meetings that are generally scheduled for the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. Your interest and participation are encouraged and appreciated.

City Council meeting agendas, minutes, and recordings are posted on the City’s Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.org.

For questions about the agenda of to receive the City Council agenda by email, contact the Deputy City Clerk at [email protected] or (707) 665-3622.

Notice is hereby given that Council may discuss and/or take action on any or all of the items listed on this agenda.

Cotati City Council Agenda October 25, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cotati City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for inspection in the online Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.org and in the City Manager’s office located at 201 West Sierra Ave, Cotati, CA during the City’s posted business hours.

Disabled Accommodations: Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate formats to persons with disabilities as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Deputy City Clerk at [email protected], or (707) 665-3622, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

Closed Captioning/Live Transcription: This meeting will be transcribed live via the Zoom platform. Zoom attendees running Zoom version 5.0.2 or higher will be able to see the transcription at the bottom of their personal Zoom screen.

Learn more at https://support.zoom.us by searching “closed captions.” Public Comment (Action Items): Public comment on any one agenda item where the City Council will be taking some action is limited to no more than three (3) minutes per person. Action items are typically designated on the agenda title.

Public Comment (Non-Action Items): Public comment on non-action agenda items shall be received during the designated portion of the agenda. Comments shall be limited to no more than three (3) minutes for all non-action agenda items.

Waiver Warning: If you challenge decisions/direction of the City Council of the City of Cotati in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at public hearing(s) described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cotati at, or prior to, the public hearing(s).

City Council meetings are conducted according to City Council Policy 2021-01: City Council Rules. This policy is available for inspection in the online Meeting Portal at www.cotaticity.org and in the City Manager’s office located at 201 West Sierra Ave, Cotati, CA, during the City’s posted business hours.

Persons wishing to address the Council are not required to identify themselves or complete a speaker card; (Gov’t Code § 54953.3); however, this information assists the Mayor by ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Council are recognized and it assists the Deputy City Clerk in preparing the City Council meeting minutes.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL

RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED

UNDER THIS AGENDA (ACTION)
A. COTATI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - OCT 11, 2022 6:00 PM

5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Meeting Orientation for New Attendees/Viewers. In conformance with the Brown Act and the adopted City Council Rules, the meeting agenda includes items labeled as Action Items, where the City Council will consider the item and citizens are afforded the opportunity to provide comments relevant to the item being discussed. The meeting agenda also includes a Citizens Business item, which is the designated place on the agenda where citizens have the right to say whatever they wish.

Cotati City Council Agenda October 25, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

The City Council may, or may not, choose to respond to comments, as the Government Code allows. However, if the City Council declines to respond, it should not be perceived as giving credence to or agreeing with any statements that the City Council or its members believe are incorrect, misinformed or purposefully biased.

B. Measure S supports police services, a variety of recreation programs for all ages, and the maintenance of our streets, parks, and public buildings. See details on the web at cotaticity.org
C. Citizens interested in receiving City of Cotati community alerts via text or email are encouraged to sign up with Nixle by downloading the Everbridge app from the IOS or Android app store or by texting your zip code (94931) to 888777.

D. Like always, we love to hear from you, so please feel free to contact the City at 707- 792-4600 or [email protected]. If you have a non-emergency issue after normal business hours, you can contact us at 707-792-4611 and of course if you have an emergency, please contact 9-1-1. Continue to look for updates on the City's website and social media channels available on Facebook, Instagram, Nixle, and Nextdoor.

6. APPROVAL OF FINAL AGENDA (ACTION)

7. CITIZEN BUSINESS AND PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
Any member of the public wishing to speak to the Council on any item(s) listed on the Consent Calendar or any matter(s) not listed on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council may do so at this time. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council is not allowed to consider issues or take action on any item not listed on the agenda during this period. Pursuant to City Council Policy 2021-01, comments of any member of the public are normally restricted to a total of three (3) minutes in length per person for matters not on the agenda and a total of three (3) minutes per person in length for any and all items on the Consent Calendar.

The Mayor may extend the time limit for a reasonable time where a disability accommodation has been requested.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
A. MAIN FLUSHING AND WATER TREATMENT SERVICES FOR THE

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
It is recommended the City of Cotati City Council by motion approve a Standard Service Agreement with No-Des, Inc. to provide main flushing services for a 2-week period
B. ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2021 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION WEST SIDE

PROJECT
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the 2021 West Side Street Project, authorizing the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County Clerk, and authorizing the release of retention after 35 day noticing period with no protests.

Cotati City Council Agenda October 25, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

C. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY'S LAND USE CODE TO CREATE A WOONERF DESIGN STANDARD FOR MULTIFAMILY, MIXED-USE, AND OTHER PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS,

CITYWIDE
It is recommended by the Community Development Department and the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati that the City Council introduce an Ordinance that would allow for the development and regulation of Woonerfs (multi-use/multi-modal zones) as part of certain new private development projects.

D. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE CONDUCTING

COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS REMOTELY

DUE TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS FOR THE PUBLIC
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Cotati adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361)

9. DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS (ACTION)
A. ORDINANCE TO INTRODUCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE

AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF COTATI
It is recommended that the Council of the City of Cotati introduce and conduct the first reading of an Ordinance to update and amend the California Building Code to implement changes for the 2022 Building Code cycle, and provide staff direction on optional programs.

11. REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
A. PRESENTATION ON THE PENSION UNFUNDED ACCRUED LIABILITY

MANAGEMENT POLICY STATUS AND DISCUSSION ON ESTIMATED
ACTIVITY.

It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation and discuss potential measures to address impacts of 2022 CalPERS Unfunded Pension Liability. No action will be taken.

B. SAFE PROGRAM EXPANSION TO INCLUDE SONOMA STATE

UNIVERSITY
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into and execute a revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma State University and Petaluma People Services Center to Operate and Manage the Rohnert Park/Cotati SAFE Team (Specialized Assistance for Everyone) to provide crisis response services to our communities.

Cotati City Council Agenda October 25, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

C. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE
HIGHWAY 116 AND WEST COTATI AVENUE INTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
It is recommended the City Council of the City of Cotati adopt a resolution 1) approving a professional services agreement with Fehr & Peers to provide public outreach and preliminary design services for the Highway 116/West Cotati Avenue Intersection Safety Improvements Project, and 2) Approving a Professional Services Agreement with M-Group for providing Environmental Review services for the subject project

12. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS

14. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-ACTION AGENDA ITEMS

15. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED
A. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED
Information or written comments pertaining to this meeting, and which was received after the agenda was posted, is attached below.

16. ADJOURNMENT
Certification of Posting of the Notice: I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Cotati and that I posted this notice on the City's website, bulletin boards of City Hall, Veterans' Memorial Building and the SMART Train Depot, on or before October 21, 2022.
/s/ Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk

MINUTES

JOINT MEETING OF THE COTATI CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE FORMER COTATI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday October 11, 2022
6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Landman called the meeting to order at 6:00pm.

2. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Mark Landman Mayor Remote
Susan Harvey Vice Mayor Remote
Laura Sparks Councilmember Remote
Ben Ford Councilmember Remote
John C. Moore Councilmember Absent
Staff present: City Attorney John Bakker, City Manager Damien O’Bid, Deputy City Clerk Kevin Patterson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Craig Scott, Director of Administrative Services Angela Courter, Director of Community Development Noah Housh, Associate Planner Autumn Buss

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL

RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED

UNDER THIS AGENDA (ACTION)
A. COTATI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - SEP 27, 2022 6:00 PM RESULT: ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Landman, Harvey, Sparks, Ford
ABSENT: Moore

5. ANNOUNCEMENTS

4.A
Packet Pg. 6
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 11, 2022 6:00 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL Cotati City Council Minutes October 11, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

A. Meeting Orientation for New Attendees/Viewers. In conformance with the Brown Act and the adopted City Council Rules, the meeting agenda includes items labeled as Action Items, where the City Council will consider the item and citizens are afforded the opportunity to provide comments relevant to the item being discussed. The meeting agenda also includes a Citizens Business item, which is the designated place on the agenda where citizens have the right to say whatever they wish.

6. PRESENTATIONS
A. REVIEW OF DRAFT CITY WEBSITE
Presentation by City Manager Damien O'Bid.

Councilmembers comment.

Public Comment:

Marjorie Crump-Shears of Cotati
Kay Rivers of Cotati

7. APPROVAL OF FINAL AGENDA (ACTION)
City Manager Damien O'Bid recommended to table Item 11A, as an error was discovered in the Ordinance.

8. CITIZEN BUSINESS AND PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
Public Comment:

Tammy Eaton

4.A
Packet Pg. 7
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 11, 2022 6:00 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL Cotati City Council Minutes October 11, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

9. CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Laura Sparks, Councilmember
AYES: Landman, Harvey, Sparks, Ford
ABSENT: Moore
A. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A MILITARY

EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
B. 2022 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE FOR CITY HALL AND CITY COUNCIL

MEETINGS
C. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COTATI AND THE COUNTY OF

SONOMA FOR ELECTION SERVICES

10. DIRECTION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE

AMENDING THE ZONING CODE TO FACILITATE LOCAL FOOD

PRODUCTION AND URBAN AGRICULTURE IN COTATI, AND

CHANGING THE ZONING OF THE VERONDA-FALLETTI RANCH
PROPERTY (175 W. SIERRA AVENUE) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD, LOW
DENSITY (NL), TO OPEN SPACE, RECREATION (OSR).

RESULT: NO ACTION
B. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY'S LAND USE CODE TO CREATE A WOONERF DESIGN STANDARD FOR MULTIFAMILY, MIXED-USE, AND OTHER PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS,

CITYWIDE
RESULT: INTRODUCED [UNANIMOUS]
Next: 10/25/2022 6:00 PM
MOVER: Ben Ford, Councilmember
SECONDER: Susan Harvey, Vice Mayor
AYES: Landman, Harvey, Sparks, Ford
ABSENT: Moore
Presentation by Associate Planner Autumn Buss
Councilmembers Comment.

Public Comment:

4.A
Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 11, 2022 6:00 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL Cotati City Council Minutes October 11, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

Jenny Blaker of Cotati
Neil Hancock of Cotati
Laurie-Ann Barbour of Cotati
Council voted to introduce the Ordinance, with the following changes: 1) Change the transition zone between an arterial and a woonerf entrance to 50 feet; and 2) Revise the language in Section 1a and delete Section 2a, with the goal of encouraging creation of woonerf creation within new developments, without inadvertently causing the addition of unnecessary internal driveways within those developments.

12. REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
A. PUBLIC CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT 6TH CYCLE HOUSING
ELEMENT DURING THE 30-DAY PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
Presentation by Director of Community Development Noah Housh.

Councilmembers comment.

No public comment.

B. COVID-19 UPDATE
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Susan Harvey, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Ben Ford, Councilmember
AYES: Landman, Harvey, Sparks, Ford
ABSENT: Moore
Presentation by City Manager Damien O'Bid.

Councilmembers comment.

No public comment.

Council votes to return to in-person/hybrid meetings beginning on November 22, 2022.

13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Report by City Manager Damien O'Bid.

14. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Councilmembers report out on local and regional events and committees.

15. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-ACTION AGENDA ITEMS
No public comment

4.A
Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 11, 2022 6:00 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL Cotati City Council Minutes October 11, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

16. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED
A. INFORMATION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS POSTED

17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Landman adjourned the meeting at 8:27pm.

4.A
Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 11, 2022 6:00 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING OF ALL Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Main Flushing and Water Treatment Services for the Water Distribution System Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Craig Scott, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Recommendation
It is recommended the City of Cotati City Council by motion approve a Standard Service Agreement with No-Des, Inc. to provide main flushing services for a 2-week period Background
The City owns and operates a public drinking water system and is regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board. Proper maintenance of the water system requires regular flushing of the distribution system and particularly the pipelines with low points and dead ends. The flushing maintains water clarity and discharges sediment that may collect in the system.

Analysis/Discussion
With the increased frequency and severity of droughts, and the current multi-year drought, owners and operators of public water systems are increasingly using closed system flushing techniques, instead of flushing water, to conserve water. The City used the closed system technique in 2016 and is again proposing its use.

The closed system flushing method consists of hiring a service which provides a trailer mounted water filtration system, real time water quality measurement and pumping equipment to draw water from one hydrant, treat the water, and return the treated water to the system. The filters remove sediment which is not harmful to customers but does lead to discoloration and has the potential to clog water meters.

The City has researched providers of this service and have only found the one provider, No-Des, Inc. City Staff requested and No-Des, Inc. provided a quote to provide the treatment trailer, replacement filters, appurtenant equipment including hoses and fittings, and a crew of two for approximately a two-week period. The process begins with “burndown” of the equipment which sanitizes the trailer mounted equipment prior to use, then the flushing operation including moving from one location to another, and replacement filters. City Staff has identified areas of town for this treatment and it would cover approximately one-third of the distribution system or approximately seven miles of pipeline.

8.A
Packet Pg. 11
Financial Considerations
The City’s adopted FY22/23 Budget includes $60,000 for main flushing contract services which was based on a prior quote received in 2021. The updated quote for services attached from NoDes, Inc. is for an amount of $69,648. Therefore, Staff is proposing reclassifying the required $9,650 of additional funds required from the water operation fund’s repairs & maintenance account. No budgetary adjustments or actions are required from the City Council at this time.

Environmental Issues
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

Attachments:

City of Cotati No-Des Contract Operations Flushing Quote (PDF)

8.A
Packet Pg. 12
NO-DES, Inc.
1860 Bosque
Farms Blvd.

Bosque Farms
NM 87068
United States
Estimate
#2222
10/20/2022
This Quote was requested by : Craig Scott - Public Works Director / City Engineer All orders are subject to terms and conditions included in NO-DES Flushing Agreement. Pricing estimates are subject to change based on availability of parts and specification change requests.

Customer must provide personnel to oversee the project, perform desired valving or sampling and communication with the public. Customer must provide liquid chlorine for desired disinfection and any necessary traffic control measures.

Areas that need additional hose lengths or specialized equipment will have additional cost. Additional insurance requirements, bonding, prevailing wage, and other requirements by customer are at additional cost.

Move on/off and burndown are performed on weekdays during normal work hours. An extra fee will be charged for requesting these tasks over holiday or weekend days, or in conjunction with a project that requires prevailing wage rates.

Filters are billed based on usage in addition to the daily rate of service. Filter usage is determined by the condition of the distribution system which affects the rate of filter loading. Used filters are property of the customer and can be kept or disposed of as desired.

All contracts will be billed at the end of each work week. Payment is due net 15.

Insurance certificates are available upon request. Customer is responsible for all permits, reporting and sampling requirements to the appropriate regulatory agencies.

Bill To Ship To TOTAL
City of Cotati
201 W Sierra Ave
Cotati CA 94931-4217
United States
City of Cotati
201 W Sierra Ave
Cotati CA 94931-4217
United States
$69,648.00
Expires: 11/19/2022
Expires Exp. Close Project Sales Rep Partner Shipping Method 11/19/2022 11/30/2022 Ohm Kongtang
Quantity Item Options Rate Amount
1 Flushing Package
10 Flushing
Standard NO-DES flushing process includes 1 NO-DES
unit operated by 2 NO-DES employees and all necessary
equipment to perform the flushing operation in a
normal potable water distribution system. Discount
rates are available for longer flushing contracts, contact your sales rep for details.
$5,400.00 $54,000.00
10 Fuel Surcharge
Fuel Surcharge
$120.00 $1,200.00
1 Burndown
Burndown fee - disinfection of NO-DES equipment prior
to use in customer system.
$2,750.00 $2,750.00
1 Move On/Off
Mobilization fee to move NO-DES equipment to/from
customers site.
$2,000.00 $2,500.00
300 1Micron MultiLayer (Knight)
Knight Multilayer Polypropylene #2 Size Bag w/
extended 32"
long finished length, 7 Layers, w/ Special Customer
Approved
"FS" Flange Top, 1 Micron Rating
Case Quantity: 30 Per Box
$28.00 $8,400.00
$68,850.00

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: City of Cotati No-Des Contract Operations Flushing Quote (Main Flushing Agreement) NO-DES, Inc.
1860 Bosque
Farms Blvd.

All contracts will be billed at the end of each work week. Payment is due net 15.

Insurance certificates are available upon request. Customer is responsible for all permits, reporting and sampling requirements to the appropriate regulatory agencies.

Subtotal $68,850.00
Tax Total (9.5%) $798.00
Total $69,648.00

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: City of Cotati No-Des Contract Operations Flushing Quote (Main Flushing Agreement) Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Acceptance of the 2021 Pavement Preservation West Side Project Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Craig Scott, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the 2021 West Side Street Project, authorizing the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County Clerk, and authorizing the release of retention after 35 day noticing period with no protests.

Background
The City’s Five-Year Capital Improvements Program includes a list of street paving projects.

The paving projects are based on a Pavement Management Program (PMP), updated every 2 years, which guides the identification and prioritization of street pavement maintenance projects.

The PMP provides strategies to prioritize the annual roadway projects based on their condition and treatment costs.

Pavement maintenance projects are significantly funded by, and made possible by, Measure S, the City’s local revenue measure and City Council continues to prioritize street repair and maintenance. Expenditures are detailed in the annual Measure S reports. The City has completed $5.7 million of roadway rehabilitation in the last two years and has made considerable progress improving the condition of its roadways. The 2021 Street Construction & Improvements Project (a.k.a. West Side Project) consisted of pavement rehabilitation of West Cotati Avenue, West School Street, Clifford Street, Richardson Lane, and portions of Old Redwood Hwy (between Myrtle and Page), Condor Ct, Robin Ave, and John Roberts Drive.

Analysis/Discussion
On August 24, 2021, the City Council awarded the construction contract to the lowest qualified bidder, Ghilotti Bros, Inc. The bid amount was $3,095,133, which was 16 percent below the engineer’s estimate. A Notice to Proceed was issued with a construction start date of September 20, 2021, and a required completion date, as specified by contract documents, of December 3, 2021. On March 22, 2022, the City Council approved increasing the Project’s budget Construction Contract to reflect rehabilitating additional streets and upgrading the guardrail on

8.B
Packet Pg. 15
West School Street, as detailed in the attached resolution. The contractor was granted additional workdays due to weather and the added scope of work.

The Project has been managed and inspected by the City’s contract Construction Manager, Green Valley Consulting Engineers. The contract work has been completed on schedule and within budget. The final inspection was completed on June 15, 2022, and the work was determined to have been substantially completed in accordance with the project requirements. A punch list of remaining items was completed by early October and the City Engineer is recommending the project for acceptance by the City Council. Following City Council acceptance, a Notice of Completion is to be filed with the County Recorder and, after thirty-five days, if no protests are received, the City is to release the retention to the Contractor.

Financial Considerations
On March 22, 2022, the City Council authorized additional Project funds in the amount of $376,900 to account for added scope, and the total Project budget increased from $3,704,000 to $4,080,900 (including Construction Contract, Construction Management, and Construction Design support agreements, as detailed in the attached resolution). The total project expenditure of $4,012,692 is less than the authorized Project budget of $4,080,900. Remaining funds will be returned to the City’s unappropriated General Fund balance.

Total retention withheld from payment on the above expenses related to this project in the amount of $171,591.14 is to be returned to Ghilotti Bros Construction upon completion of the filing period.

Environmental Issues
The Project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as it consists of the repair and maintenance of an existing facility.

8.B
Packet Pg. 16
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Introduction of an Ordinance to amend the City's land use code to create a Woonerf design standard for multi-family, mixed-use, and other private developments, Citywide
Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Autumn Buss, Associate Planner
Recommendation
It is recommended by the Community Development Department and the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati that the City Council introduce an Ordinance that would allow for the development and regulation of Woonerfs (multi-use/multi-modal zones) as part of certain new private development projects.

I. Background
On May 3, 2021, staff presented a proposal to amend the City’s multifamily open space standards to create a menu of useable open space options. The Woonerf concept was introduced and included as an option for providing this required common space.

On June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Multifamily Objective Design Standards and voted to recommend approval of the proposed standards, including the Woonerf as an option.

On August 10, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing on the recommended Multifamily Objective Design Standards and discussed the Woonerf concept. Generally, the Council supported the Woonerf concept, but there was not a consensus on whether to count the Woonerf towards the required useable open space requirement. The City Council continued the item to allow staff to respond to the various questions and issues raised by the Council.

On September 28, 2021, the City Council held a second public hearing on the recommended Multifamily Objective Design Standards. At the hearing the City Council reached a consensus on the Woonerf issues and voted 5 to 0 to approve the Multifamily Objective Design Standards with modifications. The major modifications included capping the amount of common indoor recreation that could be counted as useable open space at 15-percent and to remove the Woonerf as a useable open space option. It was the City Council’s position that Woonerfs should generally be required for all new multifamily developments and the Council directed staff to

8.C
Packet Pg. 17
draft an Ordinance to amend the Cotati Land Use Code to establish Woonerf requirements and standards, citywide. Staff has prepared draft Woonerf-living streets (multi-use zone) standards and an Ordinance to adopt them.

On November 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and 17.90.020 of the Cotati Municipal Code, creating and regulating the Woonerf-living street as a development required design element. After reviewing and providing some direction to staff, the Commission voted to approve a resolution recommending adoption of an Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs to the City Council.

On December 14, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and 17.90.020 of the Cotati Municipal Code, creating and regulating the Woonerf as a development required design element. After reviewing the draft Ordinance and hearing public comment, the Council directed staff to make certain revisions to the draft Ordinance for future Planning Commission and Council consideration.

On September 19, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the revised draft Ordinance and passed a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the draft Ordinance with minor changes. The Planning Commission also requested the Council consider whether the proposed 60-foot transition zone between an arterial and a woonerf entrance is appropriate.

On October 11, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing on the revised draft Ordinance including the minor changes recommended by the Planning Commission, and discussed the issue of the transition zone as requested by the Planning Commission. The City Council voted to adopt the Ordinance, with the following changes: 1) Change the transition zone between an arterial and a woonerf entrance to 50 feet; and 2) Revise the language in Section 1a and delete Section 2a, with the goal of encouraging creation of woonerf creation within new developments, without inadvertently causing the addition of unnecessary internal driveways within those developments.

II. Analysis/Discussion
Generally, a woonerf is a street/driveway that takes the focus off the automobile, instead prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists. Through the absence of sidewalk boundaries, curbs, and distinct lanes, those on foot and bike have equal access to the street/driveway in a woonerf.

Traffic calming features consist of pedestrian amenities and decorative elements rather than speedbumps which do not add the pedestrian experience. Woonerfs are often used on public streets in the Netherlands to create public space in front of homes to provide a place to play, socialize, and engage in the community. In the United States the woonerf has been used as a placemaking strategy to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment within existing commercial areas as part of redevelopment projects.

The proposal before the City Council is an ordinance amending the Land Use Code to require new multifamily and horizontal mixed-use developments to include a woonerf(s) as a part of projects to make internal driveways more welcoming, appealing, and safer for everyone and to

8.C
Packet Pg. 18
promote more options for common space. A woonerf will typically include features such as street furniture, planters, street trees, and benches, creating more opportunity for social interaction and bringing more people to driveways to walk, bike and play, while still accommodating automobile circulation and parking. For more information about Woonerfs, see Attachment 1: December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs.

The City Council reviewed the previous draft Ordinance related to woonerfs in December 2021, and directed staff to make revisions reflecting certain concerns, including:
• Define “internal driveway” and require that all qualifying internal driveways within a development may be candidates for woonerfs.
• Remove the requirement of a minimum of 100 square feet of woonerf per dwelling in favor of design standards that will maximize the amount of woonerf space in each new development.
• Ensure that woonerfs are not placed on driveways that accommodate heavy motor vehicle circulation.

The revised draft Ordinance currently presented for the Council’s consideration includes revisions that attempt to address these concerns, as well as providing clarification and further refinement of the previous draft’s standards for clarification and in order to increase user comfort and safety within the woonerf. Major components of the current draft Ordinance are summarized below.

1. Woonerfs are generally required for new multifamily and horizontal-mixed use developments with private internal driveways that provide vehicular access within a single project. All internal driveways are candidates for woonerfs, with the goal of maximizing the amount of woonerf space within a given development. (This provision replaces the minimum 100 square feet of woonerf per dwelling unit proposed in the previous version of the draft Ordinance.)

2. “Internal driveway” is added to the definitions in the Land Use Code.

3. Internal driveways that accommodate heavy motor vehicular circulation (defined as more than 100 motor vehicles trips during the afternoon or evening peak hour) will not be subject to the woonerf requirement, although developers will be encouraged to design developments to reduce the occurrence of such heavy-traffic driveways and maximize the opportunities for woonerfs. Woonerfs shall be designed to minimize cut-through traffic by non-residents.

4. Woonerfs may be designed for one-way or two-way vehicular traffic.

5. The speed limit within a woonerf shall be 8 miles per hour, applied to all wheeled vehicles or devices.

8.C
Packet Pg. 19

6. Woonerfs shall be located in proximity to residential entries and common areas.

7. Woonerfs shall include clear and distinctive entrances and exits with signage, a change in pavement, and traffic calming features. Exits shall be clearly marked so that users are aware of the transition out of the woonerf environment.

8. Entrances to each woonerf shall be preceded by a transition zone of 20 feet from a public connector street or intersection with another (non-woonerf) driveway, or 5060 feet from an arterial, to allow drivers time to reduce speed, facilitate vehicle stacking to avoid blocking streets and sidewalks, and improve emergency vehicle access. The transition zone shall be designed to slow traffic and alert drivers to the upcoming woonerf, with cautionary signage and a narrowed driveway, landscaping, and/or other measures.

9. Traffic calming measures shall be no less than 100 feet apart within the woonerf.

10. Emergency vehicle access shall be provided as approved by the Fire Marshal.

11. The minimum length of a Woonerf shall be 60 feet; there is no maximum length. The width may vary throughout the Woonerf to allow for traffic calming, seating, other amenities, and, as needed, motor vehicle passing bays.

12. Continuous curbs are prohibited to emphasize that the woonerf is a shared space.

13. The woonerf shall incorporate seating, landscaping, and other pedestrian and decorative amenities along its full length to promote common use of the space and to calm traffic.

Seating areas shall be provided at no less than 100 feet apart.

14. The surface shall be decorative pavement for the full length and width of the woonerf.

Permeable pavement is allowed.

15. Motor vehicle parking within and adjacent to a Woonerf is permitted provided the parking is intermittent and designed to calm traffic. Parallel parking is preferred, but non-parallel parking may be allowed. A woonerf adjacent to enclosed garages shall be allowed, but without tandem parking in front of such garages. Parking spaces within the woonerf will not be allowed within 35 feet of woonerf exits or entrances.

16. Bicycle parking shall be provided in the woonerf in accordance with standards in the Land Use Code and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

17. Woonerf space shall not be used to meet the open space or other common space required for a development.

18. Developers may request approval of alternatives to woonerfs on a project-by-project basis, if such alternative design concepts are superior in terms of creating usable, safe, pleasant outdoor spaces for residents and reducing the impacts of motor vehicles. Such alternatives might include peripheral parking, clustered parking, and/or significant centralized open space amenities that serve all of the residential units.

8.C
Packet Pg. 20
For more information about the revisions to the draft ordinance in response to Council direction at the December 14, 2021 City Council meeting, please see Attachment 2: Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of Draft Ordinance.

III. General Plan Consistency
Below is a summary of some of the most applicable General Plan policies that apply to the Woonerf Ordinance.

Policy CON 2.1: Improve air quality through continuing to require a compact development pattern that focuses growth in and around existing urbanized areas, locating new housing near places of employment, encouraging alternative modes of transportation, and requiring projects to mitigate significant air quality impacts.

Goal H-2: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the housing needs of all economic segments of the community.

Policy H-2.6: Ensure that the City’s development requirements, including the standards established by the General Plan and Land Use Code, accommodate and provide for available housing sites that are appropriate for a range of income levels and housing types, including housing to accommodate special needs populations.

Goal H-3: Expand affordable housing opportunities for lower income households and persons with special housing needs, including seniors, disabled persons, large households, and homeless persons and families.

Goal H-5: Promote energy efficiency and conservation in residential development.

Policy H-5-2 Encourage energy efficiency and energy conservation in existing and proposed residential development to ensure sustainable practices and reduce long-term housing costs.

Goal H-6: Ensure public participation in the development of the City’s housing policies.

Staff finds that the proposed Woonerf Ordinance is consistent with the adopted Cotati General Plan in that the Ordinance would require a circulation design element that would encourage compact development and encourage alternative transportation modes, require new development to incorporate design elements to reduce reliance on automobiles and calm traffic circulation speeds, thereby reducing the costs of transportation for some residents while also improving safety; would incorporate seating and universal design elements into the circulation networks of private development to reduce circulation barriers to seniors, disabled persons and other special needs populations; further support energy conservation and sustainable practices in residential development by accommodating all modes of transportation and requiring landscaping in circulation areas; and would do so through a collaborative and publicly engaged process.

IV. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation
On September 19, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the draft ordinance

8.C
Packet Pg. 21
at a Public Hearing. After hearing the staff presentation and asking some clarifying questions, the Commission heard comments from the public. Following discussion, the Planning Commission voted to support the proposed Woonerf ordinance with minor changes and passed a resolution recommending City Council approval. Changes requested by the Planning Commission have been made to the draft ordinance for the Council’s review, and include:

1. Add “lane” to the definition of internal driveway for increased clarity. This expands on the previous list of “private driveway, accessway, driving aisle, street, or alley.”

2. Apply the 8 mph speed limit in the woonerf to all wheeled vehicles and devices, in addition to motor vehicles. This would encompass bicycles, scooters, skateboards, rollerblades, etc.

In addition, the Planning Commission expressed concern that the proposed transition zone of 60 feet from an arterial to the entrance to a woonerf is excessive, and would result in unnecessary additional pavement, reduced overall woonerf area, and driver acceleration on approaching the woonerf entrance. However, staff remains supportive of the 60-foot transition zone from arterials (E. Cotati Avenue, Old Redwood Highway, and Gravenstein Highway) in order to allow drivers to reduce speed, allow sufficient vehicle stacking to avoid blocking sidewalks or traffic on the arterial, and facilitate emergency vehicle access.

In an effort to clarify the nature of the transition zone, staff amended the draft ordinance following the Planning Commission to specify that transition zones shall be designed to slow traffic and alert drivers to the upcoming woonerf, with cautionary signage and a narrowed driveway, landscaping, and/or other measures.

V. Financial Considerations
With the exception of the staff time needed to create the Woonerf Ordinance, here are no direct financial impacts to the general fund associated with the creation of the Woonerf Ordinance.

There may be some additional cost associated with the inclusion of a woonerf in the design of future development projects withing the city, however these are likely to be marginal and not a significant strain on the budget of an individual project.

VI. Environmental Issues
The City of Cotati is proposing changes to the Land Use Code to allow for the development and regulation of woonerfs within new private developments to provide increased use of common space by requiring and/or allowing woonerfs to enhance the use of internal driveways by providing pedestrian amenities and utilizing traffic calming techniques. The code changes are

8.C
Packet Pg. 22
also intended to maintain the potential intensity of development that may otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district where a woonerf may be developed. Thus, the proposed code changes maintain the current potential for environmental impacts as analyzed in the Cotati General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2013-08-2037), certified in March 2015.

No physical changes to the environment will result from adoption of the proposed code amendments alone. Future Woonerf developments allowed by the code changes would be subject to individual review and to project-specific use, development, and design standards on a project specific basis, including project-level CEQA analysis if applicable. Evaluation of future projectlevel impacts would be too speculative to include in this analysis. Accordingly, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15145, project level impacts are not discussed herein.

VIII. Summary and Staff Recommendations
It is recommended by the Community Development Department and the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati that the City Council introduce an Ordinance that would allow for the development and regulation of Woonerfs (multi-use/multi-modal zones) as part of certain new private development projects.

Attachments:

1. December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs

2. Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of Draft Ordinance

3. Powerpoint presentation for October 11, 2022 City Council meeting Attachments:

Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (PDF)
Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (PDF) Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (PDF)

8.C
Packet Pg. 23
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: PUBLIC HEARINGS (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Introduction of an ordinance to amend the City's land use code to create a Woonerf-Living Street design standard for multi-family, mixed-use and other private developments, Citywide
Date: December 14, 2021
Written by: Noah Housh, Director of Community Development Recommendation
It is recommended by the Planning Commission and Community Development Department that the City Council of the City of Cotati introduce an Ordinance that would allow for the development and regulation of woonerfs-living streets (multi-use zones) as part of certain new private development projects.

Background
On May 3, 2021, staff presented a proposal to amend the City’s multifamily open space standards to create a menu of useable open space options. The woonerf concept was introduced and included as an option for providing this required common space.

On August 10, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing on the recommended Multifamily Objective Design Standards and discussed the woonerf concept. Generally, the Council supported the woonerf concept, but there was not a consensus on whether to count the woonerf towards the required useable open space requirement. The City Council continued the item to allow staff to respond to the various questions and issues raised by the Council.

On September 28, 2021, the City Council held a second public hearing on the recommended Multifamily Objective Design Standards. At the hearing the City Council reached a consensus on the woonerf issues and voted 5 to 0 to approve the Multifamily Objective Design Standards with modifications. The major modifications included capping the amount of common indoor recreation that could be counted as useable open space at 15-percent and to remove the woonerf as a useable open space option. It was the City Council’s position that woonerfs should generally be required for all new multifamily developments and the Council directed staff to

10.A
Packet Pg. 286

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards draft an ordinance to amend the Cotati Land Use Code to establish woonerf requirements and standards, citywide. Staff has prepared draft woonerf-living streets (multi-use zone) standards and an ordinance to adopt them.

On November 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and 7.90 of the Cotati Municipal Code, creating and regulating the woonerf-living street as a development required design element. After reviewing and providing some direction to staff, the Commission voted to approve a resolution recommending adoption of an Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs to the City Council.

Analysis/Discussion
Generally, a woonerf is a street/accessway that takes the focus off the automobile and instead prioritizes pedestrians, and cyclists. Through the absence of sidewalk boundaries, curbs, and distinct lanes, those on foot and bike have equal access to the street/driveway. Traffic calming features consist of pedestrian amenities and decorative elements rather than speedbumps which do not add the pedestrian experience. Woonerfs are often used on public streets in the Netherlands to create public space in front of homes to provide a place to play, socialize, and engage in the community. In the United States the woonerf has been used as a placemaking strategy to create a more pedestrian friendly environment within existing commercial areas as part of redevelopment projects.

The proposal before the Council is an amendment to the Land Use Code is to require new multifamily and horizontal mixed-use developments to include a woonerf(s) as a part of projects to make certain driveways/accessways internal to the project more welcoming, appealing, and safer for everyone, and to promote greater options for common space. A woonerf will typically include features such as street furniture, planters, street trees, and benches, creating more opportunity for social interaction and bringing more people out to driveways/accessways to walk, bike and play, while still accommodating automobile circulation and parking.

10.A
Packet Pg. 287

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Photos of Netherland Woonerf Examples
Major components of the attached draft ordinance are summarized below:

10.A
Packet Pg. 288

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards o Generally required for new multifamily and horizontal-mixed use developments that include a private internal driveway that provides vehicular access within a single project. o Are to be included on driveways that function as a street or alley where the car should not be the predominant circulation element and located in proximity to residential entries and common areas.
o A minimum of 100 square feet of woonerf shall be provided within the project for each dwelling unit.
o Shall include a clear and distinctive entrance with signage, change in pavement and traffic calming features as shown in the example above.
o A transition of 20 feet to 60 feet shall be provided between the woonerf entry and the intersection with another driveway or street. In all cases a minimum clear 20 feet of clear sight distance shall be provided prior to the woonerf entrance. o Traffic calming measures shall be no less than 160 feet apart within the woonerf. o Emergency vehicle access shall be provided as approved by the Fire Marshal. o The minimum length should be 60 feet and maximum length should not exceed approximately 300 feet.
o Continuous curbs are prohibited to emphasize that the woonerf is a shared space. o The woonerf shall incorporate seating, landscaping, and other pedestrian, and decorative amenities along its full length to promote common use of the space and to calm traffic. o The surface shall be decorative pavement for the full length and width of the woonerf. o Parking within and adjacent to a woonerf is permitted provided the parking is intermittent and designed to calm traffic.
o Areas not appropriate for woonerf include the typical double-loaded head-in open parking lot or leftover fringe areas of the development as shown in the photo below:

10.A
Packet Pg. 289

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Woonerf Design Examples and Requirements
The proposal before the City Council is unique in that the draft ordinance includes standards and regulations regarding the development of woonerfs as part of new private development projects.

Historically, woonerfs have been used to retrofit existing streets to calm traffic and improve the pedestrian experience. As such, examples of woonerfs developed as a part of a new residential project are limited. Known examples include the Tower Apartments located at the intersection of East Cotati Avenue and Lancaster Drive (shown below). This is an affordable 50-unit apartment project that includes a central driveway that includes some woonerf elements such as decorative pavement and eliminated curbs in the center portion adjacent to common open space and community buildings. The perimeter driveways are constructed in a typical parking lot configuration.

10.A
Packet Pg. 290

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Tower Apartments-781 E. Cotati Avenue- includes woonerf elements Intersection of a “woonerf” and a typical parking lot driveway

10.A
Packet Pg. 291

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Aerial View of Tower Apartments “woonerf”
A separate example, Riggs Park Place, is a 90- unit townhome project under construction in Washington D.C that includes a woonerf as a central vocal point. The Riggs Park Place site plan and woonerf are shown below. Both examples are similar in that the woonerf is limited to a centrally located drive aisle that appears and functions as a street or alley with limited or no parking.

10.A
Packet Pg. 292

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Riggs Park Place
- Washington D.C

10.A
Packet Pg. 293

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards Based upon the examples available, studies that have been completed regarding the conversion of existing streets to woonerfs and input from the Planning Commission, staff has prepared the attached draft ordinance. In general, the proposed standards do not require all driveways and parking areas within a multiple-family project to be designed as a woonerf. Rather, the draft standards require a limited portion of the project to include a woonerf similar in scale to the two examples show above. The proposed standards require a minimum of 100 square feet of woonerf area per dwelling (comparable to the amount provided in the Tower Apartment project shown above) and specify that the woonerf include decorative paving, curb-less design, integrated landscaping, and seating along the entire length. The proposed standards allow for parallel parking within the woonerf similar to a street, but also allow for head-in parking in some circumstances provided the parking is intermittently spaced along the woonerf.

General Plan
Below is a summary of some of the most applicable General Plan policies that apply to the woonerf ordinance.

Goal H-2: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the housing needs of all economic segments of the community.

Goal H-5: Promote energy efficiency and conservation in residential development.

Policy H-5-2 Encourage energy efficiency and energy conservation in existing and proposed residential development to ensure sustainable practices and reduce long-term housing costs.

Goal H-6: Ensure public participation in the development of the City’s housing policies.

Staff Response:

Staff finds that the proposed Woonerf-Living Street Ordinance is consistent with the adopted Cotati General Plan in that the Ordinance would require a circulation design element that would encourage compact development and encourage alternative transportation modes, require new development to incorporate design elements to reduce reliance on automobiles and calm traffic circulation speeds, thereby reducing the costs of transportation for some residents while also

10.A
Packet Pg. 294

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards improving safety; would incorporate seating and universal design elements into the circulation networks of private development to reduce circulation barriers to seniors, disabled persons and other special needs populations; further support energy conservation and sustainable practices in residential development by accommodating all modes of transportation and requiring landscaping in circulation areas; and would do so through a collaborative and publicly engaged process.

Planning Commission Review and Recommendation
On November 1, 2021, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the draft ordinance at a Public Hearing. After hearing the staff presentation and asking some clarifying questions, the Commission heard comments from the public. Generally, these comments requested that the Ordinance truly seek to make woonerf design multimodal, making cars, bicycles and pedestrians equal in their importance. After closing the Public Hearing, the Commission voted to support the woonerf-living streets ordinance, but requested additional changes be made to:

1. Consider eliminating references to automobile driver priorities.

2. Consider changes to the width requirements to allow more flexibility in the traffic calming efforts and design choices.

3. Support full multi-modal design within the woonerf.

Staff responded by eliminating any specific width requirement (but keeping the emergency vehicle access compliance and Fire Marshall approval); eliminating any references to automobile driver preferences and adding some additional design requirements to further support pedestrian and bicycle use of the space.

Financial Considerations
With the exception of the staff time needed to create the woonerf ordinance, here are no direct financial impacts to the general fund associated with the creation of the woonerf ordinance.

Environmental Issues
The City of Cotati is proposing changes to the Land Use Code to allow for the development and regulation of woonerfs-living streets within new private developments to provide increased use of common space by requiring and/or allowing woonerfs to enhance the use of internal driveway/accessways by providing pedestrian amenities and utilizing traffic calming techniques.

The code changes are also intended to maintain the potential intensity of development that may otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district where a woonerf may be developed.

Thus, the proposed code changes maintain the current potential for environmental impacts as

10.A
Packet Pg. 295

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards analyzed in the Cotati General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2013-08-2037), certified in March 2015.

No physical changes to the environment will result from adoption of the proposed code amendments alone. Future woonerf developments allowed by the code changes would be subject to individual review and to project-specific use, development, and design standards on a project specific basis, including project-level CEQA analysis if applicable. Evaluation of future projectlevel impacts would be too speculative to include in this analysis. Accordingly, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15145, project level impacts are not discussed herein.

Attachments:

Public comment_Woonerfs to Cotati City Council (PDF)

10.A
Packet Pg. 296

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment 1 December 14, 2021 Staff Report to City Council on Draft Ordinance to create Woonerfs (Woonerf Standards DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (LAND USE) OF THE COTATI MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ESTABLISH DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF “WOONERFS-LIVING STREETS” (MULTI-USE ZONES) WITHIN

MULTIFAMILY, MIXED USE AND OTHER PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY ADDING SECTIONF TO CHAPTER 17.36.100 DRIVEWAYS AND SITE ACCESS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.90 (DEFINITIONS)
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302, 65560, and 65800 conferred upon local governments the authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission helda duly noticed public hearing regarding multifamily objective design standards and amendments to the multifamily open space standards which included the allowance of woonerfs within multifamily projects and adopted Resolution No. PC-2021-5 recommending that the Cotati Land Use Code be amended to allow the development of woonerfs within certain private development projects; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 2021, and September 28, 2021, the City Council held duly public hearings regarding the multifamily objective design standards and amendments to the multifamily open space standards and introduced an ordinance to approve the amendments to the Land Use Code and directed staff to prepare draft amendments to the Cotati Land Use Code regarding the inclusion of woonerfs-living streets (multi-use zones) within new multifamily projects; and
WHEREAS, City staff has researched available information regarding the development of woonerfs on public streets and within private developments and prepared draft amendments to the Cotati Land Use Code to require and/or allow the development of woonerfs within new private development projects and outside of the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and

7.90 of the Cotati Municipal Code. After reviewing and providing some direction to staff, the Commission voted to approvea resolution recommending adoption of an Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Cotati helda duly noticed public hearing ona draft Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs, received the staff report and revieweda presentation from the Planning Division, considered all oral and written comments submitted to the City regarding the item, and directed staff to make certain revisions to the draft ordinance; and.

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) WHEREAS, on 2022, the City Council of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed
public hearing ona revised draft Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs, received the staff report and revieweda presentation from the Planning Division, and considered all oral and written comments submitted to the City regarding the item prior to taking its action on the item.

WHEREAS, one of the purposes of Title 17 of the City’s Municipal Code is to ensure that proposed development is of human scale, primarily pedestrian-oriented, and designed to create attractive streetscapes and pedestrian spaces; and WHEREAS, one of the purposes of Chapter 17.36-Parking and Loading of the Cotati Municipal Code is to create parking facilities that are properly designed and attractive.

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Cotati helda duly noticed public hearing, received the staff report and revieweda presentation from the Planning Division, and considered all oral and written comments submitted to the City regarding the item prior to taking its action on the item.

NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Recitals.

The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into the findings herein.

SECTION 2: Record
The Record of Proceedings (“Record”) upon which the City Council makes its decision includes, but is not limited to: 1) the 2015 General Plan, 2) the FEIR certified for the 2015 General Plan, 3) the Housing Element adopted by the City Council in 2015, and 4) all staff reports, City files and records and other documents prepared for and/or submitted to the City Council related to adoption of the “Woonerfs-Living Streets” (Multi-Use/Multi-Modal Zones) Ordinance.

SECTION 3: General Plan Consistency
The Council of the City of Cotati does hereby find that the proposed ordinance to amend the Land Use Code to establish Woonerfs-Living Streets” (Multi-Use/Multi-Modal Zones) for multifamily and commercial developments, as shown in this Ordinance, are in the best interest of the City in that they will further established goals, policies and implementation programs of the General Plan to promote development and facilities that are of human scale; to promote social interaction within multifamily and other commercial development projects; to maintaina diverse range of housing options witha focus on in-fill development; and will limit the extension of city services by providing more amenities within the built environment adjacent to new development.

Specifically, these amendments are consistent with and implement the following General Plan

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) and Housing Element policies and programs:

Policy CON 2.1: Improve air quality through continuing to requirea compact development pattern that focuses growth in and around existing urbanized areas, locating new housing near places of employment, encouraging alternative modes of transportation, and requiring projects to mitigate significant air quality impacts.

Objective LU 1B: Ensure that new growth is focused around existing development and does not facilitate the inefficient extension of city services.

Objective LU 1C: Encourage and, when possible, prioritize development of infill and underutilized sites within mostly developed areas, in order to minimize the premature extension of infrastructure
Action LU 1c: Prioritize the processing of development applications for infill, underutilized, or vacant parcels designated for urban uses over those projects requiring annexation.

Policy LU 2.2: Encourage clustering of housing so that larger areas of open space may be permanently preserved.

Objective LU 4A: Ensurea streamlined and equitable process for project permitting and outside agency coordination without compromising the enforcement of local land use regulations.

GoalH-1: Conserve and improve the existing housing stock to provide adequate, safe, and decent housing for all Cotati residents.

GoalH-2: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the housing needs of all economic segments of the community.

PolicyH-2.1 Ensure that adequate land designated for residential and/or mixed-use development is available to accommodate the City’s fair-share of ABAG’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation.

PolicyH-2.4: While the City is able to accommodate its share of the regional housing need without rezoning during the current Housing Element period, to the extent necessary, the City will consider land use re-designation in order to accommodate specific projects, while affirming all other goals of the City’s General Plan, in order to maintain Cotati’s rural character.

PolicyH-2.6: Ensure that the City’s development requirements, including the standards established by the General Plan and Land Use Code, accommodate and provide for available housing sites that are appropriate fora range of income levels and housing types, including housing to accommodate special needs populations.

PolicyH-2.8 Require housing developments to provide housing stock ata range of affordability levels to assist in meeting the City’s housing needs as required by Chapter 17.31 of the Land Use Code.

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) Policy
H-2.12: Encourage housing development on existing infill sites in order to efficiently utilize existing infrastructure.

GoalH-3: Expand affordable housing opportunities for lower income households and persons with special housing needs, including seniors, disabled persons, large households, and homeless persons and families.

PolicyH3-1: Ensure that the City’s development standards encourage development ofa range of housing types, including multifamily, mixed use, high density residential, second units, and single family units, and incentivize production of lower income housing.

PolicyH3-2: Provide incentives for affordable housing development, including density bonuses, expedited processing, relaxation in development standards, and either reduction, delay, or waiver of fees when financially feasible.

PolicyH3-7: Encourage housing for large families.

GoalH-5: Promote energy efficiency and conservation in residentialdevelopment.

PolicyH5-2 Encourage energy efficiency and energy conservation in existing and proposed residential development to ensure sustainable practices and reduce long-term housing costs.

GoalH-6: Ensure public participation in the development of the City’s housing policies.

SECTION 4: Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

The Council of the City of Cotati does hereby find that the proposed ordinance to amend the Land Use Code to establish objective design standards for Woonerfs in qualifying multifamily developments, is consistent with the program Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2013082037) for the Cotati General Plan Update that was certified on March 24, 2015 (Resolution Number 2015-11), and pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, as such no further environmental review is required.

SECTION 5: Amendment to the Cotati Municipal Code. Chapter 17.36.100 is amended as follows:

17.36.100 Driveways and site access.

F. Woonerf-Living Street (Multi-Use/Multi-Modal Zone). Any internal driveway withina Mmultifamily development or and the residential portion(s)s ofa horizontal mixed-use projects which utilizea private driveway internal to the development to provide access to multiple dwellings shall be designed as includea woonerf in keeping with the standards of this section.(s).

WAwoonerfs or woonerf elements may also be included asa part of other residential projects such as cottage courts and single family developments and in commercial developments to the extent feasible.

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.75", No bullets or
numbering
A woonerf is an internal driveway within a development used as a multi-modal, multi-use shared space where priority is given to pedestrians and bicycles. Motor vehicles are considered guests in a woonerf, and as such, are subject to traffic calming and reduced speed limits in order to force drivers to reduce travel speeds and drive with caution so that all users feel welcome and safe.

Features of woonerfs include special paving and signage, a curbless design, traffic calming measures, and integration of trees, landscape elements, seating, lighting, and other amenities.

Woonerfs also function as play courts, recreation spaces, and/or social areas for residents. The presence of woonerfs can promote more social interaction and enhance the appearance of a private development for the benefit of the development’s residents and visitors.

A woonerf is a shared-use space designed equally for pedestrians, bicycles, and recreational uses that may allow slow moving automobiles and other vehicles (motorists are considered guests within the woonerf). A woonerf shall include traffic calming measures to force motorist to slow down and drive with caution to ensure co-existence of vehicles and non-vehicular users. All users should feel welcome and safe. A woonerf shall include features such as street furniture, decorative paving, landscaping, and other design elements to promote greater use of the common space, clam vehicular traffic and enhance the appearance of a private development for the benefit of the development’s residents and visitors.

1. Location of a Woonerf.

Internal driveways within a development shall be designed as woonerfs in accordance with this Section, with the exception of except those accommodating heavy circulation, which shall be defined as those experiencing more than 100 motor vehicles trips during the afternoon or evening peak hour. To the extent possible, developments shall be designed to distribute motor vehicle travel such that as many internal driveways as possible are suitable for woonerfs.

A.Woonerfs shall be located entirely on privately owned property, outside of the public right-of-way, and Shall be located on the same parcel as the development theyit serves.

A.Shall be located on privately owned property and outside of the public right-of-way.

A woonerf shall be located only on an internal driveway that serves a single development, and cannot be located on a shared driveway serving more than one development or on a driveway that provides a vehicular connection between developments.

B.A. Woonerfs sShall be located within the development near residential unit entries, and common areas, and other amenities; an excess area at the fringe of the development is generally not an appropriate location for a woonerf. A single development may include multiple woonerfs, which may be connected to one another.

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.25",
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.33" +
Indent at: 0.67"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.25",
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.33" +
Indent at: 0.67"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5"

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) C.A woonerf shall only be used on a driveway or drive aisle that serves only one development and cannot not be used on a shared accessway serving more than one development or on a driveway that provides a vehicular connection between developments.

Woonerfs should generally be provided on the portions of accessways/driveways where the car should not be the predominant element of the street; these accessway/driveways are generally located near the residential unit entries on accessways/driveways that generally function as a street or alley; generally, a driveway located within a double loaded, open (parking spaces not within a fully enclosed garage) parking lot, is not an appropriate location for a woonerf.

2. Woonerf Design and Development Standards.

A.Internal driveways within a development, and the development itself, shall be designed to maximize the woonerf square footage to create additional amenities for residents. A minimum 100 square feet of woonerf (not including areas devoted to parking) per dwelling unit shall be provided within the development.

B.Woonerfs may be designed for one-way or two-way motor vehicular traffic.

A.C. Woonerfs shall be designed to minimize the possibility on non-resident cutthrough travel from one public street to another.

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or
numbering
B.D. Each woonerf sShall have a clear and distinctive entrances and exits with a signage indicating the woonerf status, a change in pavement texture or color, and aat entrances, a traffic calming feature such as a ramp up and/or chicane. Design measures and signage shall be placed sufficiently in advance of exits to ensure that pedestrians and bicyclists are aware that they are leaving the woonerf.

E.WThe woonerf entrance(s) shall be a minimum of 20 feet from anyits intersection with a public street or non-woonerf /driveway (or 60 feet minimum from an arterial street) to provide a clear line of sight, allow motorists time to reduce speed, and allow sufficient motor vehicle stacking space (this distance shall be referred to as the “transition zone”).The transition zone shall be designed to slow traffic and alert drivers to the upcoming woonerf, with cautionary signage and a narrowed driveway, landscaping, and/or other measures.

F.The minimum length of a woonerf shall be 60 feet, excluding the transition zone(s).

Portions of the woonerf should be wider or narrower at various locations to allow for traffic calming, seating, other amenities, and/or safe motor vehicle passing, in the case of a two-way woonerf. The minimum non-obstructed width for motor vehicle travel at any point along the woonerf shall be 13 feet. Periodic passing bays shall be provided as needed to minimize conflict between vehicles traveling opposite directions, in the case of a two-way woonerf.

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.25",
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.33" +
Indent at: 0.67"
Formatted: Font:

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
Formatted: ResBody, Indent: Left: 0.75", No bullets or
numbering, Tab stops: 0.25", Left
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or
numbering

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) Continuous curbs shall be eliminated in a woonerf to emphasize that the space is shared between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Varying pavement, planters, decorative bollards and/or similar features shall be used to prevent and/or discourage motorists from using pedestrian-only areas. Seating and play areas shall be protected from the path of motor vehicles by bollards planters, and/or similar features.

D. A minimum 20 feet clear line of sight before the woonerf entrance is to be provided to create a transition between driveway/street and the woonerf.

G. Traffic calming measures internal to the woonerf, such as slight curves or narrowing of the shared drive aisle, shall be located no less than 100160 feet apart within the woonerf so that there is no length that would allow drivers to exceed the speed limit or otherwise to think operate their vehicles as though they have priority over pedestrians or bicyclists.

In addition, forward visibility within the woonerf shall be limited to the extent possible by chicanes, landscaped planters, or other suitable traffic calming measures in order to force drivers to reduce speed.

E.The following traffic calming measures are NOT appropriate for a woonerf: speed bumps, speed humps, speed tables, dips, medians, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes, and stop signs (except at woonerf exits/intersections).

F.H. The sSpeed limit in a woonerf shall be posted at 8 miles per hour. This speed limit will apply to all wheeled vehicles or devices, as well as motor vehicles.

Emergency vehicle access shall be required as determined by the Ffire Mmarshal. Trafficcalming measures and other elements must not interfere in emergency vehicle access; it is vital to ensure that emergency vehicles can enter and exit, as well as maneuver through the woonerf.

Clear space around fire hydrants must be provided to facilitate emergency access.

G.G.

H.Traffic-calming measures and other elements must not interfere in emergency vehicle access; it is vital to ensure that emergency vehicles can enter and exit, as well as maneuver through the woonerf.

I.The minimum length of a woonerf shall be 60 feet and the maximum length approximately 300 feet; portions of the woonerf may be wider or narrower at various locations to allow for traffic calming, seating and/or other amenities.

J.Continuous curbs shall be eliminated to emphasize that the space is shared between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists; varying pavement, planters, decorative bollards and/or other similar features maybe used as needed to prevent and/or discourage motorists from using any pedestrian only areas.

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 0.25"
Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:

A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style:

A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:

0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) K.A woonerf Sshall incorporate outdoor seating;, landscaping including trees, consisting of planters, and shrubs and trees; bicycle parking; and pedestrian scale lighting to make the woonerf accessway more attractive and to calm traffic. ; sSeating areas shall be provided at a minimum of every 100 feet throughout the length of in the woonerf to encourage people to use and stay in the woonerf for various activities. Play areas and equipment, drinking fountains, trash and recycling receptacles, and other amenities may also be provided. The design of the woonerf should strive to create a series of “outdoor living rooms” for the use of residents.

I.The woonerf surfaceing shall be constructed of varying decorative smooth/flat paving (which may be permeable) and/or stamped, scored, and colored asphalt or concrete.; Sspecial paving shall be applied to the full width and length of the woonerf but different areas may utilize different treatments.

J.Bicycle parking shall be provided within the woonerf, in accordance with the standards set forth in the City’s Zoning Code and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Bicycle parking should be located for maximum convenience and security—close to dwelling units, and near the center of the woonerf, away from public streets.

K.Space provided as a woonerf according to this Section shall not be used to meet the open space or other common area space requirements for the development, unless authorized by the City Council.

Formatted: Font:

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or
numbering

3. Automobile Parking in a Woonerf.

1.Parking within or adjacent to the woonerf is allowed, with parallel parking preferred, provided that the design and placement of the parking reinforces the concept that the automobile is not the predominant element in the woonerf. d provided the parking Parking spaces must be are spaced intermittently; (no more than 2 adjacent parallel spaces and no more than 3 adjacent non-parallel spaces shall be allowed and with a minimum of 20 feet between the parking areas shall be provided to allow for seating, landscaping, and other amenities. Non-parallel spaces shall not be tandem parking in front of garages.). Parking spaces in the woonerf may not be located directly across from one another. so the car is not the predominant element in the woonerf and any parking shall be delineated by physical elements (e g bollards, landscaping) and/or a different paving materials. unless at least one side is located within fully enclosed garages, in which case tandem parking or parking in the dwelling unit’s dedicated driveway in front of the garage shall be prohibited

1. 2. Any parking within the woonerf shall be delineated from other areas of the woonerf by physical elements (e.g. bollards, landscaping) and/or different paving materials, and clearly marked. In addition, the parking designWhen parking is provided within or the adjacent to the woonerf, the parking area design shall incorporate mechanisms Formatted: Font:

Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5"

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) to calm traffic and protect pedestrians and bicyclists, such as chicanes, bollards, or curb extensions.

3.Bicycle parking shall be provided within the woonerf.

3.Parking within the woonerf should be parallel spaces. Non-parallel parking spaces adjacent to the woonerf shall be single loaded unless at least one side is located within fully enclosed garages.

4. Parking spaces within the woonerf shall not be located within 35 feet of the woonerf’s entrance, exit, or intersection with other woonerfs.

5.PParking stall and aisle dimensions in a woonerf shall comply with the minimum dimensions as included in Section 17.36.090 of this title. Be as follows:
a.Parallel parking space: 7 feet wide by 24 feet long

5. Non-parallel parking space: 9 feet wide by 18 feet long, if adjacent to another parking space; 7 feet wide by 18 feet long, if not.

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25"
Formatted: Font:

Formatted: Font color: Custom Color(RGB(33,37,41))
Formatted

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) Figure
3-12. Woonerf Element Examples (not to scale)
(Design shall comply with emergency vehicle access regulations)

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) Figure 3-13. Woonerf Entry Sign Example
Modifications to Standards. Applicants may request modifications to the woonerf provisions. The Pplanning Ccommission and/or Ccity Ccouncil may grant exceptions from the above referenced provisions of the woonerf regulations if any of the following apply:

1. The site is constrained due to unusual shape, topography, easements, or sensitive environmental areas, and the alternative design would serve to protect sensitive natural resources.

2. The Pplanning Ccommission and/or Ccity Ccouncil find the alternative design concept provides a high level of design quality and generally meets the intent of the above regulations. Acceptable alternative designs would create usable, safe, pleasant outdoor spaces for residents and reduce the impacts of motor vehicles through concepts such as peripheral parking, clustered parking, and/or significant centralized open space amenities that serve all of the residential units.

SECTION 7: Amendment to the Cotati Municipal Code. Section 17.90.020, is amended, as shown in the added definitions, in alphabetical order, as follows:

The following definitions are amended:

Internal Driveway – A private driveway, accessway, driving aisle, street, lane, or alley within a single development that provides motor vehicular access to that development’s structures, parking area(s), and/or other features or amenities.

Traffic Calming-- Physical measures, used separately or in combination, that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for nonmotorized users of streets, alleys, driveways, parking lots, woonerfs, or other places where motor vehicles are present. Depending on the situation, traffic calming may include the following measures: chicanes, ramp ups, narrow driving lanes, curb extensions/bulb outs, neck downs, speed bumps, speed humps, speed tables, dips, diagonal diverters, cul de sacs, curves/meanders, reduced corner/turn radii, street trees, landscaping, medians, stop signs, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes, bollards, signage, varying pavement colors, textured pavement, and pedestrian amenities such as street furniture.

Woonerf – An internal driveway within a development that serves as a multi-use, multi-modal shared space Driveway or drive aisle where priority is given to designed equally for pedestrians and , bicycles. Motor vehicles are considered guests in a woonerf, and as such, are subject to traffic calming and reduced speed limits. , and automobiles Features of woonerfs includewith special paving and signage, in a curbless design, traffic calming measures, and integration of ed with trees, and other landscapeed elements, seating, lighting, and other amenities, and traffic calming measures Woonerfs which also can function as a play courts, recreation spaces, and/or social areas for residents.

Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Bold

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) SECTION 8: Construction and severability.

It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Cotati to supplement applicable state and federal law and not to duplicate or contradict such law, and this ordinance shall be construed consistently with that intent. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Cotati hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 9: Effective date.

This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption pursuant to California Government Code.

SECTION 10: Publication. The city clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published and/or posted as required in Section 36933 of the California Government Code.

Approved:

Mayor
Attest:

Lauren Berges, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

John Bakker, City Attorney
This document is a true and correct copy of Ordinance Number and has been published or posted pursuant to law. California Government Code § 40806
Lauren Berges, City Clerk

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment 2 Redline of revisions from December 14, 2021 version of draft ordinance (Woonerf Standards Ordinance) City of Cotati
Community Development Department
October 11, 2022

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Consideration of an Ordinance to create Woonerf standards to allow creation of woonerfs in new private multifamily and mixed use developments
“A woonerf is an internal driveway within a development used as a multi-modal, multi-use shared space where priority is given to pedestrians and bicycles. Motor vehicles are considered guests in a woonerf, and as such, are subject to traffic calming and reduced speed limits in order to force drivers to reduce travel speeds and drive with caution so that all users feel welcome and safe.”

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Background
May 3, 2021 - Planning Commission Workshop
Woonerf included as one option to meet open space requirement in the multifamily Objective Design Standards.

June 21, 2021 – Planning Commission Public hearing
Commission voted to recommend the Standards with the woonerf option to the City Council.

August 10, 2021 – City Council Public Hearing
Consideration of the Objective Design Standards. Council discussed the woonerf concept at length and continued the item to allow staff to respond to questions raised by the Council.

September 28, 2021 – City Council Public Hearing
Council decided to remove the woonerf as an open space option in the Objective Design Standards, and directed staff to prepare an ordinance to generally require woonerfs in certain multifamily projects.

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Background
November 1, 2021-Planning Commission Public Hearing
Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the Woonerf Ordinance.

December 14, 2021- City Council Public Hearing
After considering the staff presentation and public comment, the Council requested certain revisions to the draft Ordinance.

September 19, 2022—Planning Commission Public Hearing
Commission voted to recommend a revised draft Ordinance based on Council direction from 12/14/21, with two minor changes, and requested additional Council discussion on the “transition zone”

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards December 2021 Council Direction
• Define “internal driveway” and require that all qualifying internal driveways within a development may be
candidates for woonerfs.
• Remove the requirement of a minimum of 100 square feet of woonerf per dwelling in favor of design standards that will maximize the amount of woonerf space in each new
development.
• Ensure that woonerfs are not placed on driveways that accommodate heavy motor vehicle circulation.

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Woonerf
Example

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Woonerf Example

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Proposed Woonerf Ordinance: Key Revisions
 “Internal driveway”: A private driveway, accessway, driving aisle, street, lane, or alley within a single development that provides motor vehicular access to that development’s structures, parking area(s), and/or other features or amenities
 All internal driveways are candidates for woonerfs, with the goal of maximizing the amount of woonerf space within a given development (Previously a minimum of 100 square feet/dwelling unit)  No woonerfs on driveways with “heavy traffic” (100+ motor vehicles trips during the p.m. peak hour)
 Design should reduce the occurrence of
heavy-traffic driveways and cut-through
traffic, and maximize opportunities for
woonerfs

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Proposed Woonerf Ordinance: Standards
 Clear and distinctive entrance/exit with signage, change in pavement, and traffic calming features. Permeable OK.
 Transition zone of 20’ between woonerf entry and intersection with another driveway or street (60’ for arterials) to allow entering cars to reduce speed, facilitate vehicle stacking and emergency vehicle access
 Speed limit for all wheeled vehicles/devices is 8 mph  One-way or two-way motor vehicle traffic
 Close proximity to residential entries and common areas  Traffic calming measures no less than 100’ apart (previously 160’)
 Minimum length 60’. Maximum length eliminated (new)

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Proposed Woonerf Ordinance: Standards
 Woonerf width may vary, with minimum motor vehicle travel space 13’ and vehicle passing bays provided as needed (new)  Incorporate seating, landscaping, decorative pavement, and other pedestrian/decorative amenities along full length, and eliminate continuous curbs. New: Seating to be provided at least every 100’
 Bicycle parking to be provided per Code, Bike/Ped Plan  Intermittent parking within woonerf is permitted; must be 35’ or more from entrances (new)
 Emergency vehicle access shall be provided as approved by the Fire Marshal

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Planning Commission Recommendation
 Recommended Council approval, with minor changes (incorporated in current draft ordinance):

1. Add “lane” to definition of internal driveway, expanding on the previous list of “private driveway, accessway, driving aisle, street, or alley.”

2. Apply the 8 mph speed limit to all wheeled vehicles and devices, in addition to motor vehicles. Bicycles, scooters, skateboards, rollerblades, etc.  PC raised concern that proposed 60’ transition zone from arterials (E.

Cotati, Old Red Hwy, and Gravenstein Hwy) is excessive, and might result in additional pavement, reduced woonerf area, and driver acceleration.  Staff supports the 60-foot standard to allow drivers to reduce speed, allow sufficient vehicle stacking, and facilitate emergency vehicle access.  To clarify the nature of the transition zone, staff revised the draft ordinance following the PC meeting: Shall be designed to slow traffic and alert drivers to the upcoming woonerf, with cautionary signage and a narrowed driveway, landscaping, and/or other measures.

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Recommendation
The Planning Commission and the Community
Development Department recommend that the City
Council introduce an Ordinance that would allow for
the development and regulation of Woonerfs (multiuse/multi-modal zones) as part of certain new private development projects.

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards Questions?

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment 3 Powerpoint presentation 10.11.22 (Woonerf Standards ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (LAND USE) OF THE COTATI MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ESTABLISH DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF “WOONERFS” (MULTI-USE/MULTI-MODAL ZONES) WITHIN MULTIFAMILY,

MIXED USE AND OTHER PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY ADDING SECTION F TO CHAPTER 17.36.100 DRIVEWAYS AND SITE ACCESS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.90 (DEFINITIONS)
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302, 65560, and 65800 conferred upon local governments the authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing regarding multifamily objective design standards and amendments to the multifamily open space standards which included the allowance of woonerfs within multifamily projects and adopted Resolution No. PC-2021-5 recommending that the Cotati Land Use Code be amended to allow the development of woonerfs within certain private development projects; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 2021, and September 28, 2021, the City Council held duly noticed public hearings regarding the multifamily objective design standards and amendments to the multifamily open space standards and introduced an ordinance to approve the amendments to the Land Use Code and directed staff to prepare draft amendments to the Cotati Land Use Code regarding the inclusion of woonerfs within new multifamily projects; and WHEREAS, City staff has researched available information regarding the development of woonerfs on public streets and within private developments and prepared draft amendments to the Cotati Land Use Code to require and/or allow the development of woonerfs within new private development projects and outside of the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and

7.90 of the Cotati Municipal Code. After reviewing and providing some direction to staff, the Commission voted to approve a resolution recommending adoption of an Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed public hearing on a draft Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs, received the staff report and reviewed a presentation from the Planning Division, considered all oral and written comments submitted to the City regarding the item, and directed staff to make certain revisions to the draft ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed public hearing to review the proposed amendments to Chapters 17.36.100 and

7.90 of the Cotati Municipal Code. After reviewing and providing some direction to staff, the Packet Pg. 61
Commission voted to approve a resolution recommending adoption of an Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the City Council of the City of Cotati held a duly noticed public hearing on a revised draft Ordinance to define and regulate Woonerfs, received the staff report and reviewed a presentation from the Planning Division, and considered all oral and written comments submitted to the City regarding the item prior to taking its action on the item.

NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Recitals.

The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into the findings herein.

SECTION 3: General Plan Consistency
The Council of the City of Cotati does hereby find that the proposed ordinance to amend the Land Use Code to establish Woonerfs (Multi-Use/Multi-Modal Zones) for new developments, as shown in this Ordinance, is in the best interest of the City in that it will further established goals, policies, and implementation programs of the General Plan to promote development and facilities that are of human scale; to promote social interaction within multifamily and other commercial development projects; to maintain a diverse range of housing options with a focus on in-fill development; and will limit the extension of city services by providing more amenities within the built environment adjacent to new development.

Specifically, these amendments are consistent with and implement the following General Plan and Housing Element policies and programs:

Policy CON 2.1: Improve air quality through continuing to require a compact development Packet Pg. 62
pattern that focuses growth in and around existing urbanized areas, locating new housing near places of employment, encouraging alternative modes of transportation, and requiring projects to mitigate significant air quality impacts.

Objective LU 1B: Ensure that new growth is focused around existing development and does not facilitate the inefficient extension of city services.

Policy LU 2.2: Encourage clustering of housing so that larger areas of open space may be permanently preserved.

Objective LU 4A: Ensure a streamlined and equitable process for project permitting and outside agency coordination without compromising the enforcement of local land use regulations.

Goal H-1: Conserve and improve the existing housing stock to provide adequate, safe, and decent housing for all Cotati residents.

Goal H-2: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the housing needs of all economic segments of the community.

Policy H-2.1 Ensure that adequate land designated for residential and/or mixed-use development is available to accommodate the City’s fair-share of ABAG’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation.

Policy H-2.4: While the City is able to accommodate its share of the regional housing need without rezoning during the current Housing Element period, to the extent necessary, the City will consider land use re-designation in order to accommodate specific projects, while affirming all other goals of the City’s General Plan, in order to maintain Cotati’s rural character.

Policy H-2.8 Require housing developments to provide housing stock at a range of affordability levels to assist in meeting the City’s housing needs as required by Chapter 17.31 of the Land Use Code.

Policy H-2.12: Encourage housing development on existing infill sites in order to efficiently utilize existing infrastructure.

Packet Pg. 63
Goal H-3: Expand affordable housing opportunities for lower income households and persons with special housing needs, including seniors, disabled persons, large households, and homeless persons and families.

Policy H-3-1: Ensure that the City’s development standards encourage development of a range of housing types, including multifamily, mixed use, high density residential, second units, and single family units, and incentivize production of lower income housing.

Policy H-3-2: Provide incentives for affordable housing development, including density bonuses, expedited processing, relaxation in development standards, and either reduction, delay, or waiver of fees when financially feasible.

Policy H-3-7: Encourage housing for large families.

Goal H-5: Promote energy efficiency and conservation in residential development.

Policy H-5-2 Encourage energy efficiency and energy conservation in existing and proposed residential development to ensure sustainable practices and reduce long-term housing costs.

Goal H-6: Ensure public participation in the development of the City’s housing policies.

SECTION 4: Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

The Council of the City of Cotati does hereby find that the proposed ordinance to amend the Land Use Code to establish objective design standards for Woonerfs in qualifying developments is consistent with the program Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2013082037) for the Cotati General Plan Update that was certified on March 24, 2015 (Resolution Number 2015-11), and pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, as such no further environmental review is required.

SECTION 5: Amendment to the Cotati Municipal Code. Chapter 17.36.100 is amended as follows:

17.36.100 Driveways and site access.

F. Woonerf (Multi-Use/Multi-Modal Zone). Any internal driveway within a multifamily development or the residential portion(s) of a horizontal mixed-use project shall be designed as a woonerf in keeping with the standards of this Section. Woonerfs or woonerf elements may also be included as a part of other residential projects such as cottage courts and single-family developments and in commercial developments to the extent feasible.

A woonerf is an internal driveway within a development used as a multi-modal, multi-use shared space where priority is given to pedestrians and bicycles. Motor vehicles are considered guests in a woonerf, and as such, are subject to traffic calming and reduced speed limits in order to force drivers to reduce travel speeds and drive with caution so that all users feel welcome and safe.

Packet Pg. 64
Features of woonerfs include special paving and signage, a curbless design, traffic calming measures, and integration of trees, landscape elements, seating, lighting, and other amenities.

1. Location of a Woonerf.
a. Any internal driveways within a development shall be designed as woonerfs in accordance with this Section, with the exception of those accommodating heavy circulation, which shall be defined as those driveways experiencing more than 100 motor vehicles trips during the afternoon or evening peak hour. To the extent possible, developments shall be designed to distribute motor vehicle traffic so that internal driveways are suitable for woonerfs. b. Woonerfs shall be located entirely on privately owned property, outside of the public rightof-way, and on the same parcel as the development they serve. c. A woonerf shall be located only on an internal driveway that serves a single development, and cannot be located on a shared driveway serving more than one development or on a driveway that provides a vehicular connection between developments. A single development may include multiple woonerfs, which may be connected to one another. d. Woonerfs shall be located near residential unit entries, common areas, and other amenities; an excess area at the fringe of the development is not an appropriate location for a woonerf.

2. Woonerf Design and Development Standards.
a. Woonerfs may be designed for one-way or two-way motor vehicular traffic. b. Woonerfs shall be designed to minimize the possibility on non-resident cut-through travel from one public street to another.
c. Each woonerf shall have clear and distinctive entrances and exits with signage indicating the woonerf status, a change in pavement texture or color, and at entrances, a traffic calming feature such as a ramp up and/or chicane. Design measures and signage shall be placed sufficiently in advance of exits to ensure that pedestrians and bicyclists are aware that they are leaving the woonerf.
d. Woonerf entrance(s) shall be a minimum of 20 feet from any intersection with a public street or non-woonerf driveway (or 50 feet minimum from an arterial street) to provide a clear line of sight, allow motorists time to reduce speed, and allow sufficient motor vehicle stacking space (this distance shall be referred to as the “transition zone”). The transition zone shall be designed to slow traffic and alert drivers to the upcoming woonerf, with cautionary signage and a narrowed driveway, landscaping, and/or other measures.

Packet Pg. 65
e. The minimum length of a woonerf shall be 60 feet, excluding the transition zone(s).

Portions of the woonerf should be wider or narrower at various locations to allow for traffic calming, seating, other amenities, and/or safe motor vehicle passing. The minimum nonobstructed width for motor vehicle travel at any point along the woonerf shall be 13 feet.

Periodic passing bays shall be provided as needed to minimize conflict between vehicles traveling in opposite directions, in the case of a two-way woonerf. f. Continuous curbs shall be eliminated to emphasize that the space is shared between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Varying pavement, planters, decorative bollards, and/or similar features shall be used to prevent and/or discourage motorists from using pedestrianonly areas. Seating and play areas shall be protected from the path of motor vehicles by bollards, planters, and/or similar features.
g. Traffic calming measures shall be located no less than 100 feet apart within the woonerf so that there is no length that would allow drivers to exceed the speed limit or otherwise operate their vehicles as though they have priority over pedestrians or bicyclists. In addition, forward visibility within the woonerf shall be limited to the extent possible by chicanes, landscaped planters, or other suitable traffic calming measures in order to force drivers to reduce speed.
h. The following traffic calming measures are NOT appropriate for a woonerf: speed bumps, speed humps, speed tables, dips, medians, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes, and stop signs (except at woonerf exits/intersections). i. The speed limit in a woonerf shall be posted at 8 miles per hour. This speed limit will apply to all wheeled vehicles or devices as well as motor vehicles. j. Emergency vehicle access shall be required as determined by the Fire Marshal. Traffic calming measures and other elements must not interfere with emergency vehicle access; it is vital to ensure that emergency vehicles can enter and exit, as well as maneuver through the woonerf. Clear space around fire hydrants must be provided to facilitate emergency access. k. A woonerf shall incorporate outdoor seating; landscaping including trees, planters, and shrubs; bicycle parking; and pedestrian scale lighting to make the woonerf more attractive and to calm traffic. Seating areas shall be provided at a minimum of every 100 feet to encourage people to use the woonerf for various activities. Play areas and equipment, drinking fountains, trash and recycling receptacles, and other amenities may also be provided. The design of the woonerf should strive to create a series of “outdoor living rooms” for the use of residents.
l. The woonerf surface shall be constructed of varying decorative smooth/flat paving (which may be permeable) and/or stamped, scored, and colored asphalt or concrete. Special paving shall be applied to the full width and length of the woonerf but different areas may utilize different treatments.

Packet Pg. 66
m. Bicycle parking shall be provided within the woonerf, in accordance with the standards set forth in the Cotati Land Use Code and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Bicycle parking should be located for maximum convenience and security—close to dwelling units, near the center of the woonerf, and away from public streets to the extent possible. n. Space provided as a woonerf according to this Section shall not be used to meet the open space or other common area space requirements for the development, unless authorized by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.

3. Automobile Parking in a Woonerf
a. Parking within a woonerf is allowed, with parallel parking preferred, provided that the design and placement of the parking reinforces the concept that the automobile is not the predominant element. Parking spaces must be spaced intermittently; no more than 2 adjacent parallel spaces and no more than 3 adjacent non-parallel spaces shall be allowed and a minimum of 20 feet between the parking areas shall be provided to allow for seating, landscaping, and other amenities. Non-parallel spaces shall not be in the form of tandem parking in front of garages. Parking spaces in the woonerf may not be located directly across from one another, unless at least one side is located within fully enclosed garages. b. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked and delineated from other areas of the woonerf by physical elements such as bollards, landscaping, and/or different paving materials. In addition, the parking design shall incorporate mechanisms to calm traffic and protect pedestrians and bicyclists, such as chicanes, bollards, or curb extensions c. Parking spaces in the woonerf shall not be located within 35 feet of the woonerf’s entrance, exit, or intersection with other woonerfs.
d. Parking stall and aisle dimensions in a woonerf shall be as follows:
i. Parallel parking space: 7 feet wide by 24 feet long
ii. Non-parallel parking space: 9 feet wide by 18 feet long, if adjacent to another parking space; otherwise, 7 feet wide by 18 feet

Figure 3-13. Woonerf Entry Sign Example
Packet Pg. 67
Figure 3-12. Woonerf Element Examples (not to scale)
(Design shall comply with emergency vehicle access regulations) SECTION 6: Modifications to Standards. Applicants may request modifications to the Woonerf provisions. The Planning Commission and/or City Council may grant exceptions from the above referenced provisions of the woonerf regulations if any of the following apply:

1. The site is constrained due to unusual shape, topography, easements, or sensitive environmental areas, and the alternative design would serve to protect sensitive natural resources.

Packet Pg. 68

2. The Planning Commission and/or City Council find the alternative design concept provides a high level of design quality and generally meets the intent of the above regulations. Acceptable alternative designs would create usable, safe, pleasant outdoor spaces for residents and reduce the impacts of motor vehicles through concepts such as peripheral parking, clustered parking, and/or significant centralized open space amenities that serve all of the residential units.

SECTION 7: Amendment to the Cotati Municipal Code. Section 17.90.020 is amended as shown in the added definitions in alphabetical order, as follows:

Woonerf – An internal driveway within a development that serves as a multi-use, multi-modal shared space where priority is given to pedestrians and bicycles. Motor vehicles are considered guests in a woonerf, and as such, are subject to traffic calming and reduced speed limits. Features of woonerfs include special paving and signage, a curbless design, traffic calming measures, and integration of trees, landscape elements, seating, lighting, and other amenities. Woonerfs also function as play courts, recreation spaces, and/or social areas for residents.

SECTION 8: Construction and severability.

Packet Pg. 69
SECTION 9: Effective date.

This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption pursuant to California Government Code.

SECTION 10: Publication. The city clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published and/or posted as required in Section 36933 of the California Government Code.

Approved:________________________________
Mayor
Attest:____________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:
___________________________
John Bakker, City Attorney
This document is a true and correct copy of Ordinance Number and has been published or posted pursuant to law. California Government Code § 40806
_______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved:________________________________
Mayor
Attest:____________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:
___________________________
John Bakker, City Attorney
This document is a true and correct copy of Ordinance Number and has been published or posted pursuant to law. California Government Code § 40806
_______________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 70
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: CONSENT CALENDAR (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Adoption of a resolution to continue conducting Council, Commission, and Committee meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns for the public Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Cotati adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361)
Background
When the COVID-19 pandemic started, local agencies struggled to conduct their public meetings in compliance with the Brown Act’s public accessibility requirements while still abiding by stayat-home orders. As a result, Governor Newsom signed Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, and N-35-20 to grant local agencies the flexibility to meet remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. These orders expired on September 30, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 361 – Brown Act: Remote Meetings During Emergencies. AB 361 went into effect immediately upon signature by the governor. It amends the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue having purely virtual meetings using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology under specified conditions.

There are key differences between the Executive Orders, which expired September 30, 2021, and AB 361. AB 361 imposes requirements with respect to public comment, however, the City of Cotati currently satisfies legal requirements with respect to live public comment via Zoom in alignment with AB 361. Additionally, public agencies must either make findings by majority vote that the state of emergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person, or that health officials continue to impose or recommend

8.D
Packet Pg. 71
measures to promote social distancing. These conditions continue to exist. Determinations by the local agency that the emergency impacts the ability to meet safely in person must be revisited every 30 days.

Governor Newsom’s March 4, 2020 Proclamation of Emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is still in effect. In addition, the Sonoma County Public Health Officer continues to recommend teleconferencing or social distancing to protect the public’s health and safety during local government meetings.

Continuing the remote meetings would provide for a consistent meeting format until the pandemic emergency is lifted.

Analysis/Discussion
AB 361 amends Government Code Section 54953 to provide an alternative to having the public access the locations where City Councilmembers are teleconferencing in from. To have teleconference public meetings, without providing access to City Councilmember’s private residences, the City Council must pass a resolution stating that they have reconsidered the circumstances of the COVID-19 state of emergency and that any of the following circumstances exist:

1. The state of emergency as a result of COVID-19 continues to directly impact the ability of the members of City Council and the members of the City’s Commissions, and Committees to meet safely in person; and

2. State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

This Resolution makes the findings to confirm the current conditions to allow teleconference meetings pursuant to AB 361 for the City Council and on behalf of all of the commissions and committees created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b). The Resolution authorizes teleconference meetings including hybrid meetings held both via teleconference and in-person. This Resolution will allow members of the public to safely observe and participate in local government teleconference meetings during the continued pandemic.

AB 361 requires City Council to make these findings every 30 days to continue teleconference hearings. If adopted, staff will agendize this item once a month until the state of emergency is

8.D
Packet Pg. 72
over, or City Council no longer believes teleconference meetings are necessary.

If the Resolution is not adopted, the City will be required to hold public meetings in-person or conduct teleconference meetings pursuant to subsection 54953(b)(3) of the California Government Code which will require posting of the agenda at each teleconference location and for the public to be admitted to each teleconference location.

Financial Considerations
There are no direct financial impacts from enactment of the proposed resolution.

8.D
Packet Pg. 73
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI

AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS DURING A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54953 (AB 361) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cotati is committed to ensuring public access to observe and participate in local government meetings; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City Council and its other legislative bodies created pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b) are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, so that any member of the public may participate in local government meetings; and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor signed Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings by teleconference or by other means; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21 which ended the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 on September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 (2021) into law allowing legislative bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions, including the requirement that the legislative body make specified findings. AB 361 (2021) took effect on October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, AB 361 requires that, if a state of emergency remains active, or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, the legislative body shall make findings that it reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and that either the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person, or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and
WHEREAS, the state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, related to the pandemic of coronavirus commonly as COVID-19 has not been rescinded and remains in effect; and
WHEREAS, new variants of COVID-19 have developed, and risks of illness or death due to such variants remains significant to the general public; and WHEREAS, State and local health officials have imposed and recommended social distancing measures for the protection of public health and safety in response to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Public Health Officer continues to recommend teleconferencing or social distancing during public meetings of all legislative bodies to protect the community’s health against the spread of COVID-19; and Packet Pg. 74
WHEREAS, teleconference meetings may include hybrid meetings, in which all or some members of the legislative body meet in person while others attend by teleconference, and members of the public are either allowed to participate only by teleconference or both in person and by teleconference (“hybrid meetings”). The purpose of hybrid meetings is to allow for multiple modes of attending meetings while reducing the risks of COVID-19, including its variants; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, acting as a legislative body pursuant to Government Code section 54952(a) and for the benefit of the commissions, committees, and other bodies that were created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b) (collectively referred to as “Legislative Bodies”), finds that the current conditions meet the circumstances set forth in Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to allow Legislative Bodies to continue to use teleconferencing to hold open and public meetings if the Legislative Bodies comply with the requirements set forth in Government Code section 54953(e)(2) to ensure the public can safely participate in and observe local government meetings.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cotati that:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Current Conditions Authorize Teleconference Public Meetings of Legislative Bodies.

Based on the California Governor’s continued declaration of a State of Emergency and the Sonoma County Public Health Officer’s recommendation to continue teleconferencing or social distancing during public meetings, the City Council finds that the conditions continue to exist pursuant to Government Code sections 54953(e)(3) to allow Legislative Bodies to use teleconferencing to hold public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(2) to ensure members of the public have continued access to safely observe and participate in local government meetings.

Section 3. Authorize Legislative Bodies to Conduct Teleconference Meetings. The Legislative Bodies are hereby authorized to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(2) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately and shall be in effect for a period of 30 days from the date of adoption. The City Council may reconsider the circumstances necessitating this resolution within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on the October 25th, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

Approved:________________________________
Packet Pg. 75
Mayor
Attest:____________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:
____________________________
City Attorney
Packet Pg. 76
Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: PUBLIC HEARINGS (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Ordinance to introduce the 2022 California Building Code as adopted by the City of Cotati
Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Damien O'Bid, City Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Council of the City of Cotati introduce and conduct the first reading of an Ordinance to update and amend the California Building Code to implement changes for the 2022 Building Code cycle, and provide staff direction on optional programs.

Background
The California Building Standards Code (Title 24) is organized into 13 parts and is updated every three years. Local jurisdictions that choose to amend Title 24 are required to adopt this building code by ordinance for local enforcement within 180-days after the updated Title 24 is published by the State, which occurred on July 1, 2022.

In adopting Title 24 for local enforcement, a local jurisdiction may amend the State standards to address local geologic, topographic or climatic conditions, but in no case may these amendments be less restrictive than the State code. The authority to make such amendments is provided through a combination of Government Code Sections; however each amendment requires specific justification. In addition, there are a number of Appendices which are not required to be adopted by local agencies, however their adoption may serve to simplify or clarify local regulation processes by providing consistent regulations across jurisdictions.

Since the 2008 Code adoption, Sonoma County jurisdictions have collaborated in adopting local amendments. The goal is to limit local amendments to the State Codes as much as practical and use common language in their adoptions. This “common code” is designed to give developers, contractors and citizens consistent requirements and code language, which streamlines the permitting process and requires less education for the local building community. Minor changes have been made to the code language, but Sonoma County jurisdictions have attempted to limit code amendments in an effort to remain uniform with the State. It should be noted that most of the changes in this year’s code deal with energy conservation and improving the overall efficiency of the structure.

The Sonoma County Fire Prevention Officer’s Association and the Sonoma County Fire Chief’s

10.A
Packet Pg. 77
Association have endorsed the 2022 Fire Code amendments. Municipal Code Section 15.08 Excavation, Grading and Earthwork Construction are amended to reflect the State regulations regarding Stormwater management and reference 2022 State Building Codes.

Analysis/Discussion
The ordinance proposes to supersede the City of Cotati Building Code (Municipal Code Chapter

14.04) to meet the requirements and criteria of the 2022 California Building Code Standards.

While the 2022 Code is very similar to the 2019 code, it does include several differences which are summarized below.

Separately, the Ordinance proposes to adopt several Appendices to the 2022 California Building Standards Code with the intent to establish clear and consistent regulation of elements outside of the typical building code. Note that the proposed amendments to the code and appendices are the same amendments and appendices adopted by the City in the prior building code cycle. The only difference is the addition of the residential code appendix for Tiny Homes. With the recent approval by City Council of the Cottage Housing Ordinance, staff believes there may be some need to allow modified standards for things like stairways, lofts, etc. in the cottage homes. The addition of this appendix does not change the zoning requirements, simply allows for modified building standards when applicable.

The proposed amendments will establish (or re-establish) local City of Cotati regulations addressing:

1. Appendices in the California Building Code proposed to be adopted include:

H. Signs
I. Patio Covers
J. Grading
O. Emergency Housing

2. Appendices in the California Plumbing Code proposed to be adopted include:

A. Recommended Rules for sizing the Water Piping System.

B. Explanatory Notes on Combination Water and Vent Systems.

C. Alternate Plumbing Systems.

D. Sizing Storm Drainage Systems.

I. Installation Standards for PEX Tubing Systems

3. Appendices in the California Existing Building Code proposed to be adopted include:

A1. Seismic Strengthening Provisions for Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Buildings.

A3. Prescriptive Provisions for Seismic Strengthening of Cripple Walls and Sill Plate

10.A
Packet Pg. 78
Anchorage of Light, Wood-Framed Residential Buildings
A4. Earthquake Risk Reduction in Wood-Framed Residential Buildings with Soft, Weak, or Open Front Walls.

A5. Referenced Standards.

4. Appendices in the California Green Building Standards Code proposed to be adopted include:

A4. Residential Voluntary Measures, Tier 1, for New Buildings and substantial remodels.

A5. Nonresidential Voluntary Measures, Tier 1, for New Buildings and substantial remodels.

5. Appendices in the California Residential Code proposed to be adopted include:

H. Patio Covers
J. Existing Buildings and Structures
K. Sound Transmission
T. Solar-Ready Provisions for Detached One- and Two-Family Dwellings.

Q, Tiny Houses
Other codes recommended for adoption by the City of Cotati include:

1. The International Property Maintenance code amended to reference the California Building Codes.

2. 2022 National Fire Code Enforcement.

Highlights of the State Code Updates from the 2019 Edition to the 2022 Edition With each code adoption cycle, the California Building Standards Code is updated to clarify ambiguous language and to bring consistency where conflicts exist among the various codes.

The updated version also includes additional code provisions to address current buildingrelated issues as highlighted below:

1. Building Code
• Although Cotati does not have any Wildland-Urban Interface designated areas it is worth noting there are extensive updates to Chapter 7A Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) regulations such as clearer definition (fire-resistant vegetation) and scoping (accessory structures), and more prescriptive measures for exterior assembly. The amendments were developed through the Office of the State Fire Marshal WUI task group and collaboration with local fire departments, other state agencies, the building industry, testing labs, and stakeholders.

10.A
Packet Pg. 79
• The definition for Group R-2 was amended to meet the requirements of SB 234, clarifying that small and large family childcare houses can operate in apartments when they comply with the regulations and with HSC 1597.46.

2. Residential Code
• Provisions for aging-in-place design and fall prevention was added to address specific aging-in-place design elements in new residential construction to facilitate access to operational features and to allow people to stay longer in their homes as they age. • Energy Storage System (ESS) vehicle impact protection was included to illustrate the zones in which a typical residential garage ESS installation would need impact protection.

3. Energy Code
• Single Family Residential - New energy storage system (ESS) ready requirements, including interconnection equipment or a dedicated raceway, a minimum of four branch circuits, a minimum busbar rating of 225 amps, and space for future installation of system isolation equipment or transfer switch.
• Single Family Residential and Multifamily - New electric ready requirements for space heating, cooking, and clothes dryers serving individual dwelling units and common areas, when gas equipment is installed. Electrical infrastructure must be provided and reserved to the equipment location for the future installation of electrical appliances. • Nonresidential - New prescriptive requirements were added for new photovoltaic (PV) and battery storage systems for specific building types, and a prescriptive heat pump space-conditioning baseline for certain climate zones. The commercial buildings included in this change include high-rise residential projects, hotels, offices, medical offices, health clinics, retailers, grocery stores, restaurants, schools and civic spaces.

4. CALGreen
• In addition to an increased number of Electric Vehicle (EV) charging spaces required for new development, expanded EV charging infrastructure for additions and alterations are triggered when new parking facilities are added or electrical systems or lighting of existing parking facilities are added or altered.

10.A
Packet Pg. 80
Other recent solar changes
In 2018, California Building Standards Commission created a new standard that requires new single-family homes and multi-family dwellings up to three stories high to install solar panels.

The California solar mandate took effect on January 1, 2020 and was incorporated into the California building codes.

Solar systems on new construction projects must have the capacity to provide all of the power needs on an annual basis. These properties haven’t been inhabited in the past, so builders estimate the electricity needs of the home based on the climate zone and square footage.

If the solar system includes battery storage systems, builders can reduce the size requirement of the solar system by up to 25%. In addition, when incorporating other energy-efficiency initiatives and demand-response measures, builders can reduce the size of the solar power system by 40% or more.

There are a few types of new residential construction that are exempt from the code. In some cases, properties with a small enough roof or those that receive an abundance of shade may be exempt from installing a PV system. Additionally, building developers can pursue and build community solar projects, as opposed to rooftop solar panel systems for each property, so long as they receive approval from both the California Clean Energy Commission (CEC) and the local utility company. Any community solar project offered in lieu of on-site solar needs to offer similar benefits to the new homeowner that a rooftop or ground-mounted system located on their property would provide.

Optional Zoning and/or Building Code Changes to Consider The following potential changes would require additional amendments to the zoning or building code(s) following adoption of the building code:

A. All Electric REACH Codes and combinations of mixed fuel building for residential and nonresidential. As mentioned previously, the new building code requires higher amperage main electrical panels in single family homes, and new all-electric wiring requirements for both single family and multi-family homes. The City Council could choose to prevent any new natural gas connections for residential and/or nonresidential construction. However, nonresidential construction would likely need exceptions, as it is not possible to foresee all potential commercial and industrial process activities that may still require natural gas.

10.A
Packet Pg. 81
B. Photo Voltaic Energy Standards for new construction. Consider a general requirement that fits into existing building code requirements that a specific percentage of a building’s electrical demand based upon an evaluation of the site and building orientation to determine maximum feasible solar.

C. Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure Standard. EV charging for single family homes are addressed in the 2022 CA Building Code Update with electrical panel and wiring changes.

As a starting point of discussion, staff recommends requiring a Multi-Family and Commercial Standard of 1 EV Charger for each 10 residential units or required parking spaces, with a minimum of 1 charger per development.

D. Certified EV Charger Installation Requirement. There has been a request to require installers of EV chargers (in some instances) to be certified in EV Installation. It is the recommendation of staff that this be incorporated into the code requirements by amending Chapter 14.38 of the Cotati Municipal Code (see sample text attached). This type of certification program would be expected to have more value for public Level 3 fast chargers, as they involve high power systems not typical in residential construction.

Financial Considerations
There are no specific general fund impacts associated with the proposed Ordinance adoption, separate from the staff and consultant time required to draft and implement the specific revisions and updates to the Cotati Building Code and adopted Appendices.

Attachments:

Draft Ordinance Language EVITP (DOCX)

10.A
Packet Pg. 82
Chapter 14.38

STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS …

14.38.010 Purpose. . .

14.38.020 Definitions. . .

14.38.030 Applicability. . .

14.38.040 Electric vehicle charging station requirements.

All electric vehicle charging stations shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by the state, the city of Cotati and the Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District. Electric vehicle charging stations shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability. (Ord. 875 § 2 (part), 2017).
(Proposed insert)
All contractors performing Level 3 electrical vehicle infrastructure work on projects which are constructed with funds provided in whole or in part by the City of Cotati, or are constructed with funds in whole or in part which are approved and or administered by the City of Cotati, shall be approved by the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (EVITP) and electricians on the job shall be EVITP certified. The contractor shall plan, implement, and comply with this EVITP policy in accordance with the policy of the City of Cotati as follows:

All of the installations, commissioning, and maintenance of Level 3 Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (“EVSE” or “Charging Stations”) systems, equipment and related infrastructure performed by Contractor (hereinafter referred to as the “EV Work”) shall conform to all the requirements set forth herein. i. At a minimum, one job-site supervisor or job-site foreman supervising the EV Work at each job site is required to be an Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program (“EVITP”) certified electrician. ii. The EV work shall be performed only by California State certified general electricians. Apprentices may assist.
iii. A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the state certified general

10.A.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Draft Ordinance Language EVITP (2023 CA Building Code Update) electricians performing the EV Work on each job site shall be EVITP certified electricians.
iv. The ratio of journeyman to apprentices shall comply with requirements set forth in California law.
v. EVITP certification requirements do not apply to apprentices. vi. All apprentices assisting on the EV work shall be registered in a State of California Approved Apprenticeship Program which has a graduation rate of at least 60%.

Contractor shall maintain a written or electronic record of all EV Work including the names of all EVITP electrician(s) who performed the EV Work. Said record shall be made available to EVITP, and/or City of Cotati upon request. i. The City of Cotati affirms that Contractor has an active California C-10 electrical contractor’s license in good standing and also affirms that Contractor meets all California requirements for electrical workforce certification, workers compensation, bonding, and insurance. ii. Contractor shall cooperate fully with EVITP, and/or the City of Cotati in case of (a) random or other quality assurance check(s). iii. Contractor is required to certify Contractor’s compliance with this EVITP Policy. Contractor shall properly complete and sign the City of Cotati EVITP Compliance Form and submit said form with their Bid Proposal. Failure to properly complete, sign, and submit an EVITP Compliance Form may result in the contractor’s bid being deemed non-responsive.
iv. Contractor’s failure to fully implement, monitor and comply with this EVITP policy may result in an assessment of penalties and/or possible sanctions against the contractor.
(End of insert)

14.38.050 Duties of building division and building official.

All documents required for the submission of an expedited electric vehicle charging station application shall be made available on the publicly accessible city of Cotati website. Electronic submittal of the required permit application and documents by email, the Internet, or facsimile shall be made available to all electric vehicle charging station permit applicants.

The city of Cotati’s building division shall adopt and maintain a standard plan and checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging stations shall comply to be eligible for expedited review.

Formatted: Highlight

10.A.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Draft Ordinance Language EVITP (2023 CA Building Code Update) The electric vehicle charging station permit process, standard plan(s), and checklist(s) shall substantially conform to recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklist and standard plans contained in the most current version of the Zero-Emission Vehicles in California: Community Readiness Guidebook published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. All fees prescribed for the permitting of electric vehicle charging stations must comply with Government Code Sections 65850.55, 66015, and 66016, and State Health and Safety Code Section 17951.

14.38.060 Permit review and inspection requirements. . .

14.38.070 Discretionary permit required. . .
...

10.A.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Draft Ordinance Language EVITP (2023 CA Building Code Update) ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI AMENDING COTATI MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 14.04, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA (CA) CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PARTS 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 AND 12 AS PUBLISHED BY THE CA BUILDING (BLDG) STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE CA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART 1, CA BUILDING CODE PART 2, VOLUMES 1 AND 2 AND ITS APPENDIX (APP) H, SIGNS; APP I, PATIO COVERS; APP J, GRADING; AND APP 0, EMERGENCY HOUSING, CA RESIDENTIAL CODE PART 2.5, AND ITS APP H, PATIO COVERS; APP J, EXISTING BLDGS AND STRUCTURES; AND APP K, SOUND TRANSMISSION, CA ELECTRICAL CODE PART 3, CA MECHANICAL CODE PART 4, CA PLUMBING CODE PART 5, AND ITS IAPMO INSTALLATION STANDARDS, INCLUDING

TABLES AND APP A, RECOMMENDED RULES FOR SIZING THE WATER PIPING SYSTEM; APP B, EXPLANATORY NOTES ON COMBINATION WASTE AND VENT SYSTEMS; APP C, ALTERNATE PLUMBING SYSTEMS; APP D, SIZING STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; AND APP I, INSTALLATION STANDARDS FOR

PEX TUBING SYSTEMS FOR HOT-AND-COLD-WATER DISTRIBUTION, CA ENERGY CODE PART 6, CA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE PART 8, CA FIRE CODE PART 9, CA EXISTING BLDG CODE PART 10, AND ITS APP A1, SEISMIC

STRENGTHENING PROVISIONS FOR UNREINFORCED MASONRY BEARING WALL BLDGS; APP A3, PRESCRIPTIVE PROVISIONS FOR SEISMIC

STRENGTHENING OF CRIPPLE WALLS AND SILL PLATE ANCHORAGE OF LIGHT, WOOD-FRAMED RESIDENTIAL BLDGS, APP A4, EARTHQUAKE RISK

REDUCTION IN WOOD-FRAME RESIDENTIAL BLDGS WITH SOFT, WEAK OR OPEN FRONT WALLS; AND APPENDIX A5, REFERENCED STANDARDS, CALIFORNIA GREEN BLDG STANDARDS CODE PART 11, INCLUDING ITS APP A4, DIVISIONS A4.1, A4.3, A4.4, A4.5 AND APP A5, DIVISIONS A5.1, A5.3, A5.4, A5.5, CA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE PART 12, THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE REGULATING AND GOVERNING THE

CONDITIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL PROPERTY, BLDGS AND

STRUCTURES, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND THE

COLLECTION OF FEES, TOGETHER WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS AND

ADDITIONS, APPENDICES, ERRATA AND SUPPLEMENTS THEREOF
WHEREAS, Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code (§§ 50022.1–50022.10) requires a local agency to take legislative action by ordinance to adopt by reference the most current edition of the California Building, International, and Uniform Codes; and
WHEREAS, Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, §50022.6 requires a copy of the primary code, proposed for adoption to be on file with the office of the City Clerk at least 15 days preceding the hearing and kept for public viewing while the ordinance is in force; and
Packet Pg. 86
WHEREAS, Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, §50022.3 requires a first reading of the titles of the adopting ordinance and the codes to be adopted thereby, as well as the title of the secondary codes to be adopted by reference, followed by scheduling of a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the State of California adopted new International Codes with state amendments on July 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the local agencies have until January 1, 2023, to adopt the new state codes with any local amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that in order to best protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Cotati, the standards of building within the City must conform with state law except where local conditions warrant more restrictive regulations; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the state codes with certain local amendments are necessary in order to better address local conditions; and
WHEREAS, notice of the ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter contained therein; and WHEREAS, this ordinance amendment is hereby found to be categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) in that the Council finds and determines that there is nothing in these amendments themselves that could foreseeably have any significant effect on the environment and in that the State of California has mandated these amendments be made by local jurisdictions in order to project the health and safety of State residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council introduced the proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 14.04 and the codes to be adopted by reference on October 8, 2019 and considered public testimony; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the modifications would be consistent with the intent of the City of Cotati General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on October 25, 2022 and has reviewed all evidence submitted in connection with the staff report, including public testimony and all other documents and evidence that are part of the City administrative record for the 2022 adoption of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 together with amendments thereto.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Packet Pg. 87
SECTION 1. Recitals made Findings. The above recitals are hereby declared to be true and correct findings of the City Council of the City of Cotati.

SECTION 2. Municipal Code Amendments. Chapter 14.04 of the City of Cotati Municipal Code is hereby superseded and replaced in its entirety as follows:

14.04.010 Adoption of codes by reference
The uniform codes and the international codes together with any amendments thereof, as hereinafter set forth in this ordinance, are adopted and made part of this ordinance, together with amendments and additions to the various codes; providing penalties for the violation thereof and repealing all ordinances in conflict therewith.

14.04.020 Copies on file
One certified copy of each of the codes so adopted, along with any amendment thereto, shall be kept on file for the use and examination by the public at the City of Cotati Community Development Department.

14.04.025 Findings
The City Council of the City of Cotati finds that in order to best protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, the standards of building within the City must conform to state law except where local conditions warrant more restrictive regulations. Therefore, the City Council desires to adopt the current state building and fire codes, contained in California Code of Regulations, Title 24, governing the construction and regulation of buildings and structures, along with the International Property Maintenance code, with the modifications and amendments contained herein.

Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 17958.7, the City Council makes the factual findings hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and finds that the amendments made in this ordinance to the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, are reasonably necessary because of the local climatic, geological or topographical conditions described in the following:

The City wishes to adopt by reference the following codes, with such amendments as may be necessary to conform to local climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions and number the adopted codes in the City of Cotati Municipal Code
California Code of Regulations Title-24

14.04.030 Part 1 – 2022 Administrative Code;

14.04.040 Part 2 – 2022 California Building Code;

14.04.050 Part 2.5 – 2022 California Residential Code;

14.04.060 Part 3 – 2022 California Electrical Code;

14.04.070 Part 4 – 2022 California Mechanical Code;
Packet Pg. 88

14.04.080 Part 5 – 2022 California Plumbing Code;

14.04.090 Part 6 – 2022 California Energy Code;

14.04.100 Part 8 – 2022 California Historical Building Code;

14.04.110 Part 9 – 2022 California Fire Code;

14.04.120 Part 10 – 2022 California Existing Building Code;

14.04.130 Part 11 – 2022 California Green Building Standards Code;

14.04.140 Part 12 – 2022 California References Standard Code;

14.04.150 2021 Edition International Property Maintenance Code;

14.04.160 2016 National Fire Code Enforcement;

14.04.180 Non-Liability of City of Cotati

14.04.190 Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances

14.04.200 Violations and Penalties

14.04.210 Fees
Under the provisions of Section 17958.5 of the Health and Safety Code, local amendments must be based on climatic, geologic and topographical conditions. The following findings address each of these situations and present the local conditions which, either singularly or in combination, justify the amendments to be adopted:

A. CLIMATE: The City, on average, experiences an approximate annual rainfall of 40 inches. This rainfall can normally be expected between October and April. During the winter months, the City may experience periods of heavy rain, which causes local flooding. Winter storms are often accompanied by high winds, which have uprooted trees and damaged power lines. The City has also experienced periods of heavy fog, which has delayed the responding fire apparatus and prevented early discovery of structure fires. During the dry period, temperatures range from 70 degrees to over 100 degrees. These temperatures are occasionally accompanied by light to gusty winds, which when coupled with highly flammable vegetation, can cause uncontrollable fires.

Wind driven fires could have severe consequences, as has been demonstrated on several occasions throughout the state.

B. GEOLOGIC: The City is susceptible to seismic hazards resulting from movement along any one of several known faults in the area. The most serious direct earthquake hazard threat is from the damage or collapse of buildings and other structures due to ground movement. In addition to damage caused by earthquakes, there is the possibility of earthquake-induced fires due to damaged gas lines, power lines or heat producing appliances, and the unavailability of water for fire control due to broken water mains.

In the event of a major earthquake many areas of the City may not be accessible to emergency equipment and, if bridges or roads are damaged, the City may be isolated from outside assistance.

C. TOPOGRAPHICAL: The City is divided by Highway 101 which creates a barrier and can obstruct traffic patterns and increase response time for fire equipment. The City's water supply and sewer system were both designed to work with existing topography Packet Pg. 89
but can be adversely affected by loss of normal operation. Sewer lift stations and well equipment can both be compromised by interruption in electrical service.

D. SUMMARY: The above local climatic, geologic and topographical conditions increase the magnitude, exposure, accessibility problems and fire hazards presented to the City of Cotati. A fire following an earthquake has the potential to cause greater loss of life and damage than the earthquake itself. The majority of the City's industrial areas are located in the highest seismic risk zones, which also contain the largest concentration of hazardous materials. Hazardous materials, primarily toxic gases, could pose the greatest threat to the largest number of persons, should a significant seismic event occur.

The City of Cotati's resources would have to be prioritized to mitigate the greatest threat and may be unavailable for vegetation or structure fires.

Other variables that may tend to intensify the situation include:

1. The extent of damage to the water system;

2. The extent of isolation due to bridge and/or freeway overpass collapse;

3. The extent of roadway damage and/or amount of debris blocking roadways;

4. Climatic conditions (hot, dry weather with high winds);

5. Time of day will influence the amount of traffic on roadways and could intensify the risk to life during normal business hours; and,

6. The availability of timely mutual aid or assistance from the neighboring jurisdictions which will likely have similar emergencies at the same time.

7. A large number of dwelling units with wood shingle roof coverings, which increase the likelihood of conflagrations.

E. CONCLUSION: Local climatic, geologic and topographical conditions impact fire suppression efforts and the frequency, spread, intensity, and the size of fire involving structures in this community. Further, they impact potential damage to all structures from earthquake and subsequent fire. Therefore, it is found to be necessary that the California Building Standard Code Title 24 be amended to mitigate the effects of these conditions.

14.04.030 California Administrative Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 1: California Administrative Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Code Council.

14.04.040 California Building Code
Packet Pg. 90
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title-24 Part 2: California Building Code, Volume 1 and 2, 2022 Edition based upon and the 2021 International Building Code, Volumes 1, and 2 thereof as published by the International Code Council with the following appendices:

Appendix Chapter H, Signs, of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted with the following amendments:

Section H101.2 Signs exempt from permits. 1 and 4 are deleted.

Appendix Chapter I, Patio Covers, of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter P, Emergency Housing, of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

California Building Code Section 105.2, Work exempt from permit, Building 1, shall be amended to read as follows:

Section 105.2, Building 1 One-story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses, and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet, (11m²). The height of the one story detached accessory building shall not exceed 12 feet at any point or as specified by local zoning ordinance.

California Building Code Section 105.2, Work exempt from permit, Building 6, shall be amended to read as follows:

Section 105.2, Building 6, Platforms, sidewalks, and driveways not more than 30 inches (762mm) above adjacent grade, not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route.

California Building Code Section 105.3.2, Time Limitation of application, is amended to read as follows:
105.3.2, Time Limitation of application, A building permit application and plan review shall expire if the application is deemed to have been abandoned, the application has not been pursued in good faith, or no permit is issued within one year of the date the application is filed. The construction plans and support documents submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period of 180 days upon written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the full control of the applicant have prevented any action from being taken. In the event that the applicant is diligently pursuing permit issuance and there have been no updates to the State of California adopted building codes or expiration of any other applicable City required permit since the time of initial submittal of the building permit application, the Building Official may extend the application an additional 180 days. Fees for extension of permit applications and plan review shall be in the amounts fixed by resolution of the City Council. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall reapply for the building permit, resubmit construction plans and supporting documents and pay a new plan review fee.

Packet Pg. 91
California Building Code Section 105.5 Expiration is amended to read as follows:
105.5, Expiration. Every permit issued shall become invalid and shall be expired unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 365 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 365 days after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period of 180 days upon a request by the applicant, in writing, showing that circumstances beyond the full control of the applicant have prevented any action from being taken. In the event that the applicant is diligently pursuing completion of work authorized by the permit the Building Official may extend the issued building permit an additional 180 days. Fees for extension of permit applications and issued permits shall be in the amounts fixed by resolution of the City Council. A request for permit extension may not be granted for an issued building permit if no work has begun or no inspections have been approved within three years of the date the permit was issued. The construction plans and support documents submitted may thereafter be destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the applicant shall reapply for the building permit, resubmit construction plans and support documents and pay a new plan review fee.

California Building Code Section 109.3 Building permit valuation, is amended to read as follows:
109.3 Building permit valuation. The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated permit value at time of application. Permit valuations shall include total value of work, including materials and labor, for which the permit is being issued, such as electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and permanent systems. If, in the opinion of the building official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the building official. The valuation for a permit may be determined or modified by the building official as necessary using the latest Building Valuation Data with a X2 multiplier published by the International Code Council in Building Standards Safety Journal and other relevant data as necessary.

California Building Code Section 202, Definitions, is amended to add the following definitions:

SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION. An existing building or structure not classified as Group R-3 occupancy, which undergoes any addition of floor area that is greater than twentyfive percent (25%) of the existing gross floor area.

SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION, Group R-3. An existing Group R-3 building or structure, which undergoes any addition of floor area that exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area.

Packet Pg. 92
SUBSTANTIAL REMODEL. An existing building or structure, which undergoes any alteration of floor area that is greater than fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area or meets the definition of a substantial improvement as defined by this code.

California Building Code Section 502.1, Address identification, is amended to read as follows:

Section 502.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall be provided with approved illuminated or other approved means of address identification. The address identification shall be legible and placed in a position that is visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address identification characters shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabetic letters. Numbers shall not be spelled out. Character size and stroke shall be in accordance with Section 502.1.1 through 502.1.2. Where required by the Fire Code Official, address identification shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response in accordance with this code and Section 505.1.3. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way or when determined by the Fire Code Official, a monument, pole, or other approved illuminated sign or other approved means shall be used to identify the structure. Address identification shall be maintained.

California Building Code Section 502.1.1 is added to read as follows:

Section 502.1.1 Numbers for one- and two- family dwellings. Each address identification character shall be not less than four (4) inches high with a minimum stroke width of one-half (0.5) inch.

California Building Code Section 502.1.2 is added to read as follows:

Section 502.1.2 Numbers for other than one- and two-family dwellings.

Each address identification character shall be not less than twelve (12) inches high with a minimum stroke width of one (1) inch. Suite and unit directional numbers shall be not less than six (6) inches high with a minimum stroke width of three-quarter (0.75) inch.

Numbers shall be not less than four (4) inches high with a minimum stroke width of onehalf (0.5) inch.

California Building Code Section 502.1.3 is added to read as follows:

Section 502.1.3 Complex directory. Where two or more buildings cannot be viewed from the public way or when determined by the Building or Fire Code Official, an approved illuminated complex directory, monument, pole, or other approved sign or means shall be used to identify the structures at the main entrances to the property.

California Building Code Section 903.6.1, Substantial remodel is added to read as follows:

Section 903.6.1 Substantial remodel. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings that undergo a substantial remodel or substantial improvement.

Exception: Alterations made solely for the purpose of providing barrier removal pursuant to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as contained in exception # 4 of Section 11B-204.2.

Packet Pg. 93
California Building Code Section 903.6.2 Substantial addition is added to read as follows:
903.6.2 Substantial addition. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings that undergo a substantial addition.

California Building Code Section 903.6.3 Substantial alteration is added to read as follows:

Section 903.6.3 Substantial alteration. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings that undergo any combination of substantial remodel, addition or both that equals fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area.

California Building Code Section 905.3.1 is amended to read as follows:

Section 905.3.1, Height. In other than Group R-3 and R-3.1 occupancies, Class III standpipe systems shall be installed throughout at each floor where any of the following occur

1. Buildings where the floor level of the highest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access.

2. Buildings that are three or more stories in height.

3. Buildings where the floor level of the lowest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) below the highest level of fire department access.

4. Buildings that are two or more stories below the highest level of fire department vehicle access.

Exceptions:

1. Class I standpipes are allowed in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.

2. Class I manual standpipes are allowed in open parking garages where the highest floor is located not more than 150 feet (45 720 mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access.

3. Class I manual dry standpipes are allowed in open parking garages that are subject to freezing temperatures, provided that the hose connections are located as required for Class II standpipes in accordance with Section 905.5.

4. Class I standpipes are allowed in basements equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system.

5. In determining the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, it shall not be required to consider either of the following:

5.1 Recessed loading docks for four vehicles or less.

5.2 Conditions where topography makes access from the fire department vehicle to the building impractical or impossible.

6. When determined by the Fire Code Official a standpipe system is not warranted in three-story buildings.

California Building Code Section 3103.1.2, TEMPORARY STRUCTURES, Permit required, is amended to read as follows:
18-16-3103.1.2 Permit Required. Temporary structures that cover an area greater than 400 square feet (11.16 m2), including connecting areas or spaces with a common means of egress or entrance that are used or intended to use for the gathering together of 10 or Packet Pg. 94
more persons, shall not be erected, operated or maintained for any purpose without obtaining a permit from the building official.

California Building Code Section 3313.1, WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION, Where required, is amended to read as follows:
3313.1 Permit Required. In buildings of combustible construction required to have automatic sprinkler system by Section 903, automatic sprinkler system shall be installed prior to construction exceeding 40 feet (12,192 mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. Such automatic sprinkler system shall be extended as construction progresses to within one floor of the highest point of construction having secured decking or flooring.

California Building Code Section 3313.2, Buildings being demolished, is added to read as follows:
3313.2 Buildings being demolished. Where a building is being demolished and an automatic sprinkler system is existing within such a building, such automatic sprinkler system shall be maintained in an operable condition so as to be available for use by the fire department. Such automatic sprinkler system shall be demolished with the building but shall not be demolished more than one floor below the floor being demolished.

California Building Code Section 3313.3, Detailed requirements, is added to read as follows:
3313.3 Detailed Requirements, Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of Section 903.

Appendix Chapter J of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted with the following amendments:

A. Insofar as they apply to the permitting of work regulated by this Ordinance, the Organization and Enforcement of this Ordinance shall be as set forth in Section 104 Chapter 1 of the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, with the exception that the City Engineer shall be the designated code enforcement officer and shall have all the powers and duties ascribed to the building official therein.

B. All references in Appendix Chapter J to the Building Official are hereby amended to refer to the City Engineer.

C. Notwithstanding A. and B. above, demolition permits shall remain under the authority of the Building Official.

D. Appendix Chapter J, Section J 103, is hereby amended to include the Grading Permit Application Requirements adopted by a separate resolution of the City Council. In the case of any discrepancies between the provisions of this Ordinance including the Code sections adopted by reference herein, and the Grading Permit Application Requirements, the latter shall supersede.

Packet Pg. 95
With respect to the activities regulated by this Chapter (i.e., Excavation, Grading and Earthwork Construction) CBC Section 113 (incorporated herein by reference) is hereby amended to include the following language:

The Cotati City Council is hereby designated as the board of appeals for activities regulated by this Chapter.

14.040.050 California Residential Code
Adoption of California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2.5: California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Conference of Building Officials, with the following appendices and amendments:

Appendix Chapter H, Patio Covers, of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter J, Existing Buildings and Structures, of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter K, Sound Transmission, of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter Q, Tiny Houses, of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter T, Solar-Ready Provisions- Detached One-and Two-Family Dwellings and Townhouses, of the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Division II Administration
California Residential Code Section R105.2 exception 1 is amended to read as follows:

R105.2, exception 1. One-story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses, and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet, (11m²). The height of the one story detached accessory building shall not exceed 12 feet at any point or as specified by local zoning ordinance.

California Residential Code Section R105.2 exception 10 is amended to read as follows:

R105.2, exception 10. Platforms, and decks not more than 30 inches (762mm) above adjacent grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling and do not serve the exit door required by Section R311.

California Residential Code Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of application is amended to read as follows:

R105.3.2 Time limitation of application. A building permit application and plan review shall expire if the application is deemed to have been abandoned, the application has not been pursued in good faith, or no permit is issued within one year of the date the Packet Pg. 96
application is filed. The construction plans and support documents submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period of 180 days upon written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the full control of the applicant have prevented any action from being taken. In the event that the applicant is diligently pursuing permit issuance and there have been no updates to the State of California adopted building codes or expiration of any other applicable City required permit since the time of initial submittal of the building permit application, the Building Official may extend the application an additional 180 days. Fees for extension of permit applications and plan review shall be in the amounts fixed by resolution of the City Council. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall reapply for the building permit, resubmit construction plans and support documents and pay a new plan review fee.

California Residential Code Section R105.5 Expiration is amended to read as follows:

R105.5 Expiration. Every permit issued shall become invalid and shall be expired unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 365 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 365 days after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period of 180 days upon a request by the applicant, in writing, showing that circumstances beyond the full control of the applicant have prevented any action from being taken. In the event that the applicant is diligently pursuing completion of work authorized by the permit the Building Official may extend the issued building permit an additional 180 days. Fees for extension of permit applications and issued permits shall be in the amounts fixed by resolution of the City Council. A request for permit extension may not be granted for an issued building permit if no work has begun or no inspections have been approved within three years of the date the permit was issued. The construction plans and support documents submitted may thereafter be destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the applicant shall reapply for the building permit, resubmit construction plans and support documents and pay a new plan review fee.

California Residential Code Section R108.3, Building permit valuation is amended to read as follows:

R108.3 Building permit valuation. The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated permit value at time of application. Permit valuations shall include total value of work, including materials and labor, for which the permit is being issued, such as electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and permanent systems. If, in the opinion of the building official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the building official. The valuation for a permit may be determined or modified by the building official as necessary using the latest Building Valuation Data with a X2 multiplier published by the International Code Council in Building Standards Safety Journal and other relevant data as necessary.

Packet Pg. 97
California Residential Code Section R108.6 is amended to read as follows:
108.6 Work commencing before permit issuance. Any person who commences any work on a building, structure, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to a fee established by the building official that shall be in addition to the required permit fees. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, may be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The minimum investigation fee is set forth in the fee schedule adopted by this jurisdiction. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law.

California Residential Code Section R202 Definitions is amended to add the following definitions:

SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION, Group R-3. An existing Group R-3 building or structure, which undergoes any addition of floor area that exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area.

SUBSTANTIAL REMODEL. An existing building or structure, which undergoes any alteration of floor area that is greater than fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area or meets the definition of a substantial improvement as defined by this code.

Section R313 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
California Residential Code Section R313.1 Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems is amended to read as follows:

R313.1 Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all townhouses regardless of square footage in accordance with this code. Fire Sprinklers shall be installed in all multi-family manufactured homes with two or more dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

Exceptions:

1. Detached Group U occupancies 1,000 sq. ft. or less.

2. Detached pool houses up to 1,000 sq. ft. in floor area within 50 feet of the pool and limited to a single bathroom.

3. A room above a detached garage used for storage only that does not contain a bathroom, cooking or refrigeration facilities or connections for such facilities.

4. Carports of non-combustible construction.

California Residential Code Section R313.1.2 Substantial remodel is added to read as follows:

R313.1.2 Substantial remodel. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all townhomes that undergo a substantial remodel or substantial improvement.

Packet Pg. 98
Exception: Alterations made solely for the purpose of complying with the American Disabilities Act.

California Residential Code Section R313.1.3 Substantial addition is added to read as follows:

R313.1.3 Substantial addition. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all townhomes that undergo a substantial addition.

California Residential Code Section R313.1.4 Substantial alterations is added to read as follows:

R313.1.4 Substantial alterations. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all townhomes that undergo any combination of substantial remodel, substantial addition or both that equals fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area. The percentage of work shall be determined and added to any successive remodels that may occur within a subsequent three (3) year period. If the combined percentage totals 50% or more, this work shall constitute a substantial improvement and the building shall be subject to the fire sprinkler requirement.

California Residential Code Section R313.2 One- and two- family dwellings automatic fire sprinkler systems is amended to read as follows:

R313.2 One- and two- family dwellings automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all one- and two-family dwellings regardless of square footage in accordance with this code. Fire Sprinklers shall be installed in mobile homes, manufactured homes and multi-family manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

Exceptions:

1. Detached Group U occupancies 1,000 sq. ft. or less.

2. Detached pool houses up to 1,000 sq. ft. in floor area within 50 feet of the pool and limited to a single bathroom.

3. A room above a detached garage used for storage only that does not contain a bathroom, cooking or refrigeration facilities or connections for such facilities.

4. Carports of non-combustible construction.

California Residential Code Section R313.2.2 Substantial remodel is added to read as follows:

R313.2.2 Substantial remodel. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all one-and two-family dwellings that undergo a substantial remodel or substantial improvement.

Exception: Alterations made solely for the purpose of complying with the American Disabilities Act.

California Residential Code Section R313.2.3 Substantial addition is added to read as follows:

R313.2.3 Substantial addition. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all one-and -two- family dwellings that undergo a substantial addition.

Packet Pg. 99
California Residential Code Section R313.2.4 Substantial alterations is added to read as follows:

R 313.2.4 Substantial alterations. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all one- and two-family dwellings that undergo any combination of substantial remodel, addition or both that equals fifty percent (50%) of the existing gross floor area. The percentage of work shall be determined and added to any successive remodels that may occur within a subsequent three (3) year period. If the combined percentage totals 50% or more, this work shall constitute a substantial improvement and the building shall be subject to the fire sprinkler requirement.

California Residential Building Code, Chapter 44, NFPA, 13D-16 is amended as follows:

Section NFPA 13D-16 - Standard for the installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes: as amended* Revise Section 5.1.1.2 to read as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.5.1.1.2. A supply of at least three sprinklers shall be maintained on the premises so that any sprinklers that have operated of been damaged in any way can be promptly replaced.

Add Sections 5.1.1.2.1 as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.5.1.1.2.1. The sprinklers shall correspond to the types and temperature ratings of the sprinklers in the property. The stock sprinklers shall include not less than one sprinkler of all types and ratings installed.

Add Sections 5.1.1.2.2 as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.5.1.1.2.2. The sprinklers shall be kept in a cabinet located where the temperature to which they are subjected will at no time exceed the maximum ceiling temperatures specified in Table 5.1.1.6.1 for each or the sprinklers within the cabinet.

Add Sections 5.1.1.2.4 as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.5.1.1.2.4. One sprinkler wrench as specified by the sprinkler manufacture shall be provided in the cabinet for each type of sprinkler installed to be used for the removal and installation of sprinklers in the system.

Revise Section 7.6 to read as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.7.6 A local water flow alarm shall be provided on all sprinkler systems.

Add Section 8.1.3.1.2.1 to read as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.8.1.2.1 Garages are permitted to be protected by residential sprinklers.

Revise Section 8.3.4 to read as follows:

Packet Pg. 100
Section NFPA.13D.8.3.4 Sprinklers shall not be required in detached garages, open attached porches, detached carports, and similar structures unless otherwise required by the California Building or Fire Codes.

Add Section 8.3.5.2 to read as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.8.3.5.2 At least one quick-response intermediate temperature residential sprinkler shall be installed above attic access openings.

Revise Section 11.2.1.1 to read as follows:

Section NFPA.13D.11.2.1.1 Where a fire department pumper connection is not provided, the system shall be hydrostatically tested at not less than 200 psi without evidence of leakage.

14.04.060 California Electric Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3: The California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition, as published by National Fire Protection Association.

14.04.070 California Mechanical Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 4: The California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Association of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials with the following amendment:

Section 104.4.35 Expiration is amended to read as follows:

Every permit issued shall become invalid and shall be expired unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within 365 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 365 days after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period of 180 days upon a request by the applicant, in writing, showing that circumstances beyond the full control of the applicant have prevented any action from being taken. In the event that the applicant is diligently pursuing completion of work authorized by the permit the Building Official may extend the issued building permit an additional 180 days. Fees for extension of permit applications and issued permits shall be in the amounts fixed by resolution of the City Council. A request for permit extension may not be granted for an issued building permit if no work has begun or no inspections have been approved within three years of the date the permit was issued. The construction plans and support documents submitted may thereafter be destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the applicant shall reapply for the building permit, resubmit construction plans and support documents and pay a new plan review fee.

14.04.080 California Plumbing Code
Packet Pg. 101
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 5: The California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Association of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials, with the following appendices and amendments:

Appendix Chapter A, Recommended Rules for Sizing the Water Supply System, of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter B, Explanatory Notes on Combination Waste and Vent Systems, of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter C, Alternate Plumbing Systems, of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter D, Sizing Storm Water Drainage Systems, of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Appendix Chapter I, Installation Standard for PEX Tubing Systems for Hot-and ColdWater Distribution, of the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby adopted.

Section 104.4.35 Expiration is amended to read as follows:

14.04.090 California Energy Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6: California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Code Council.

14.04.100 California Historical Building Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 8: California Historical Building Code, 2022 Edition, as published by the International Code Council.

Packet Pg. 102

14.04.110 California Fire Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 9: 2022 Edition of the California Fire Code as published by the International Code Council including Appendix Chapters 4, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and N, together with any amendments adopted by the Rancho Adobe Fire Protection District Board and as ratified by the Cotati City Council.

14.04.120 California Existing Building Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 10: California Existing Building Code 2022 Edition, as published by the International Code Council, including the following appendices.

Appendix Chapter A, Guidelines for the Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings including Chapter A1 Seismic Strengthening Provisions for Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Buildings; Chapter A3 Prescriptive Provisions for Seismic Strengthening of Cripple Walls and Sill Plate Anchorage of Light, Wood- Frame Residential Buildings; Chapter A4 Earthquake Risk Reduction in Wood-Frame Residential Buildings with Soft, Weak, or Open Front Walls.

14.04.130 California Green Building Standards
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title-24 Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code 2022 edition as published by the International Code Conference, including the following appendices:

Appendix Chapter A4, Residential Voluntary Measures, Tier 1 for New Buildings and substantial remodels and additions , including Division A4.1, A4.3, A4.4 and A4.5, of the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition.

Appendix Chapter A5, Non-Residential Voluntary Measures, Tier 1 for New Buildings and substantial remodels and additions , including Division A4.1, A4.3, A4.4 and A4.5, of the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition.

With the following amendments to Appendix Chapters A4 Tier 1 and Appendix Chapter A5 Tier

1. California Green Building Standards Code Appendix A4 Residential Voluntary Measures Section A4.601.1 is amended to read as follows:

A4.601.1 The Tier 1 measures contained in this appendix, Division A4.1, A4.3, A4.4, A4.5 and A4.6 are adopted as mandatory provisions for new buildings only.

California Green Building Standards Code Appendix A5 Nonresidential Voluntary Measures Section A5.601.1is added to read as follows:

Packet Pg. 103
A5.601.1 The Tier 1 measures contained in this appendix, Division A5.1, A5.3, A5.4, A5.5 and A5.6 are adopted as mandatory provisions for new buildings only.

14.040.140 California Reference Standards Code
Adoption of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 12: California Reference Standards Code, 2022 Edition as published by the International Code Council.

14.040.150 International Property Maintenance Code
Adoption of the International Property Maintenance Code 2021 Edition as published by the International Code Council, with the following amendments:

PART 1 – SCOPE AND APPLICATION: Any and all references throughout this code to any International Code shall be considered to reference the California Fire Code, California Building Code, or California Residential Code or any other California Code of Regulations, Title 24, as-applicable.

14.040.160 Adoption and Enforcement of National Fire Codes Adoption of the current edition of the National Fire Code, as published by the National Fire Protection Association.

14.04.180 Non-Liability of City of Cotati
This Ordinance shall not be construed as imposing upon the City of Cotati (or any official or employee thereof) any liability or responsibility for damages to any property or injuries to any person resulting from defects in building construction, defective plumbing, or drainage systems (or installations thereof), electrical or gas installations, or by installations of containers for the use of flammable products, nor shall the City of Cotati (or any official or employee thereof) be held as assuming any such liability or responsibility for property damage from any cause whatsoever which may have been caused by a gas leakage, fire or explosion of any gas appliance or house gas piping, electrical application or electrical wiring or from the storage or use of flammable and/or hazardous materials.

14.04.190 Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances
All other Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict with this Chapter are hereby repealed.

14.04.200 Violations and Penalties
Any person violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and any person violating the same section or a portion of an Ordinance on a second or subsequent occasion shall thereafter be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction of either an infraction or a misdemeanor shall be punishable by law.

Packet Pg. 104

14.04.210 Fees
The City Council of the City of Cotati may establish permit fees as set forth by resolution.

SECTION 3. Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, the Finding of Fact, as detailed in Section

14.04.025 of this Ordinance, are made in connection with the adoption of revisions or additions to the 2022 editions of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Parts 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.

SECTION 4. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2023.

Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Angela Courter, Director of Administrative Services Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation and discuss potential measures to address impacts of 2022 CalPERS Unfunded Pension Liability. No action will be taken.

Background
The City provides a defined-benefit pension to its retirees through the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) in lieu of a social security pension. Funding of CalPERS pensions relies on three sources: employee contributions, employer contributions, and investment returns. These three sources contribute to the City’s Market Value of Assets (MVA).

The MVA is then compared to the CalPERS actuarial determination of the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) for all member agencies. The AAL is the actuarial projection of the total amount that CalPERS should currently have to cover promised benefits over time (accounting for anticipated investment earnings and future contributions of CalPERS members and member agencies). If the AAL exceeds the MVA, the member agency’s “account” is in a deficit position and a Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) exists.

For the Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) June 30, 2021, CalPERS recorded investment earnings of

21.3% and therefore a credit actuarial base was added to the City’s pension plans, lowering the UAL balance. Currently for FYE June 30, 2022, CalPERS is reporting an estimated investment loss of 6.1% which will create a new loss actuarial base and increase the UAL balance.

Historical Actions Taken to Address Increasing Costs

11.A
Packet Pg. 106
The City has taken several steps to address the CalPERS pension costs. These have included:
1) Lower Benefit Tiers for Employees - Two new lower benefit tiers have been established with CalPERS:
a. Tier 2 Employees hired in 2011-12 (depending on employee group) are required to pay the full employee contribution and have a lower retirement benefit.
b. Tier 3 was created in 2013 because of the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) established a reduced tier of benefits for new CalPERS employees.
2) Prepayments to CalPERS - Since FY2015/16 the City has prepaid the annual Unfunded Accrued Liability payment at the beginning of each fiscal year to save over 3% annually.
3) Unfunded Pension Liability Policy – creation of this policy guides City actions to address the outstanding UAL owed by the City. This policy included establishment of a Section 115 Trust.
4) UAL Refinancing - In January of 2022, the City Council approved a refinancing strategy to contribute approximately $6,000,000 (six million dollars) to pay down the UAL. The contributions were made up of an additional borrowing of approximately $4.0 million in the form of taxable pension obligation loan at 3.2% interest rate; as well as make an additional $2.0 million cash contribution to CalPERS from reserves and ongoing revenues.

Analysis/Discussion
City staff reviewed the CalPERS actuarial reports as of June 30, 2021. The reports are based on actual returns of 21.3% for fiscal year 2020/21 and a discount rate / projected return of 6.8% for FY 2021/22. With these reports the City’s plans are all slightly overfunded except for Tier 1 Miscellaneous and Safety plans which are on average 77% funded, making overall all plans 80% funded before adjusting for the City’s Additional Discretionary Payments to those plans in January 2022. Adding the $6 Million in plan assets and reducing the liability, the City’s funded level is increased to an average 94.6% for the Tier 1 Miscellaneous and Safety Plans and even higher on combined basis, thus currently meeting the City Policy target of 90%.

Actuarial Adjustments Post June 30, 2021 - CalPERS recently announced a preliminary 6.1% investment loss for the 12-month period ending on June 30, 2022. This is CalPERS’ first loss since the global financial crisis of 2009, which was also driven by tumultuous global markets.

The investment loss, combined with the CalPERS’ 6.8% discount rate hurdle, is expected to result in a roughly 10% drop in the pension plan’s overall funded level to an estimated 84.2%,

11.A
Packet Pg. 107
before any other adjustments are considered. As a result, employer contributions are expected to increase in the coming years.

CalPERS remains focused on the long-term performance of the fund. The total fund annualized returns for the five-year period ending June 30 stood at 6.7%, the 10-year period at 7.7%, the 20- year period at 6.9%, and the 30-year period at 7.7%. This year’s returns are based on the investment portfolio that was in place before November’s new asset allocation.

Individual CalPERS members will not see an increase in rates, but CalPERS employers will.

Current estimates of the 2022 loss impact to the City are approximately $4.3 million. These losses are negatively amortized over the first two years and then are ramped up to minimize the impact to the City and hopefully be offset by future market recovery gains. However, given the CalPERS discount rate hurdle that the investment performance needs to clear every year, we do not expect that the future market returns will be able to cover the 2022 investment loss fully and quickly.

In addition to the increase in the UAL, the City can also expect the employer normal rates, which is based on a percent of employees’ salaries, to also increase from fiscal years 2022/23 to 2023/24. Miscellaneous plans for Classic and PEPRA will increase by about 1.5-2% and 0.2% respectively. Safety plan employer rates are scheduled to increase for Classic and PEPRA by 1.8-

3.2% and 0.75% respectively.

Financial Considerations
Councils’ actions over fiscal year 2021/22 have allowed to the City to meet the policy recommendation of meeting the Funded Level Objective of 90% with a calculated funded level of 94.6% after refunding.

Staff will explore the impact of eliminating negative amortization and convert from a ramp-up to a level UAL amortization for the additional 2022 bases. During strategic planning, staff will provide additional information on this strategy against other competing budget demands and provide a final recommendation to the City Council.

Environmental Issues
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Attachments:

11.A
Packet Pg. 108
Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (PDF)

11.A
Packet Pg. 109
2022 Pension
Liability Analysis
October 25, 2022
Municipal Advisory | Pension Optimization | Revenue Generation | Quantitative Strategies

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 2 CalPERS UAL Refunding Overview
• Jan 2022 – City closed on Pension Obligation and Street Improvement Loans • The closing took place right before an unprecedented run up in interest rates • Loan proceeds provided funds (incl. freed up reserves) to pay down CalPERS UAL by $6,000,000
• Aug 2022 – CalPERS published 06/30/2021 Actuarial Report:
• 21.3% investment gain
• 6.8% discount rate
• Aug 2022 – CalPERS announced estimated 2022 investment loss of 6.1%

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 3 06/30/2021 Pension Plans Overview
Pension Plan Total Accrued
Liability
Market Value
of Assets
Unfunded
Accrued
Liability
%
Funded
Miscellaneous $20,210,569 $15,497,090 $4,713,479 76.7%
Safety $16,529,171 $12,872,975 $3,656,196 77.9%
Safety 2nd Tier $1,122,174 $1,158,259 -$36,085 103.2%
Misc 2nd Tier $1,243,659 $1,275,085 -$31,426 102.5%
PEPRA Safety $1,236,914 $1,275,374 -$38,460 103.1%
PEPRA Misc $945,813 $980,241 -$34,428 103.6%
TOTAL $41,288,300 $33,059,024 $8,229,276 80.1%
Source: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports
MVA and UAL balances
do not reflect Jan 2022
UAL refunding

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 4 2022 Funded Level Estimate (Rounded)
Description Misc Plan Safety Plan Total
Market Value of Assets
2021 Balance $15,497,000 $12,873,000 $28,370,000
Normal Cost Contribution $142,000 $67,000 $209,000
UAL Payment $642,000 $372,000 $1,014,000
UAL Refunding $3,402,000 $2,598,000 $6,000,000
Benefit Payments ($1,120,000) ($950,000) ($2,070,000)
Projected 2022 Balance $18,563,000 $14,960,000 $33,523,000 Unfunded Accrued Liability
2021 Balance $4,713,000 $3,656,000 $8,369,000
UAL Payment ($642,000) ($372,000) ($1,014,000)
Interest $321,000 $249,000 $570,000
UAL Refunding ($3,402,000) ($2,598,000) ($6,000,000)
Projected 2022 Balance $990,000 $935,000 $1,925,000
Pension Plan 2022 Funded Level 94.9% 94.1% 94.6%
All 2022 numbers are
estimates and may vary
Source: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports
Does not include
impact of 2022
investment loss

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 5 2021 UAL + POB Amortization Schedule
Historical Payments
Sources: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports and Loan
Amortization Schedules
UAL and Debt Service
Payments only – no
normal cost

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 6 2022 CalPERS Performance
• Estimated investment loss of 6.1% (Aug 2022)
• Unofficial updated investment loss of 7.8% (Sept 2022) • Funding shortfall of 12.9-14.6% (after discount rate) • FY2023 results are too early to tell
• Normal Cost contributions are increasing by 2-3% for
Classic Plans and 0.2-0.8% for PEPRA Plans
Pension Plan
Estimated
2022 Add'l
UAL
Miscellaneous $1,999,000
Safety $1,661,000
Safety 2nd Tier $149,000
Misc 2nd Tier $164,000
PEPRA Safety $165,000
PEPRA Misc $126,000
TOTAL $4,264,000
Add’l UAL is estimated based on CalPERS preliminary
returns (6.1% loss) and does not include any other
possible adjustments. Actual UAL change may vary.

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 7 CalPERS Investment Returns
CalPERS Historical
Average Rates of
Return Thru 2021-22:
5 years – 6.7%
10 years – 7.7%
20 years – 6.9%
30 years – 7.7%
Source: CalPERS

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati
– UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022
8 Long Term Perspective • Market corrections are usually followed by market recoveries
• However, market returns are unlikely to
quickly and fully recapture 2022 loss due
to discount rate hurdle
• Proactive actions are encouraged

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 9 2022 Loss Impact on Funded Level (rounded)
Description Misc Plan Safety Plan Total
Market Value of Assets
2021 Balance $15,497,000 $12,873,000 $28,370,000
Normal Cost Contribution $142,000 $67,000 $209,000
UAL Payment $642,000 $372,000 $1,014,000
UAL Refunding $3,402,000 $2,598,000 $6,000,000
Investment Gain / (Loss) ($1,999,000) ($1,661,000) ($3,660,000) Benefit Payments ($1,120,000) ($950,000) ($2,070,000)
2022 Balance $16,564,000 $13,299,000 $29,863,000
Unfunded Accrued Liability
2021 Balance $4,713,000 $3,656,000 $8,369,000
UAL Payment ($642,000) ($372,000) ($1,014,000)
Interest $321,000 $249,000 $570,000
UAL Refunding ($3,402,000) ($2,598,000) ($6,000,000)
Investment (Gain) / Loss $1,999,000 $1,661,000 $3,660,000 2022 Balance $2,989,000 $2,596,000 $5,585,000
Pension Plan 2022 Funded Level 84.7% 83.7% 84.2%
All 2022 numbers are
estimates and may vary
Source: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 10 2022 Investment Loss Impact Estimate
Historical Payments
Sources: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports, Loan
Amortization Schedules,
CalPERS, and UAL
estimates
UAL and Debt Service
Payments only – no
normal cost
Safety & Misc Tier 1 only
Estimated add’l UAL
interest ≈ $4.4M

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 11 UAL Policy Implementation Strategies:

Eliminate Negative Amortization
• Additional Discretionary Payments to cover FY2023 and FY2024 interest on new UAL:
• ≈ $250,000 – pay on 07/01/2023 and 07/01/2024
• Convert from ramp-up to level UAL amortization for 2022 base • Estimated cash flow savings of ≈ $775,000

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 12 2022 Adjusted Loss Impact Estimate
Historical Payments
Sources: 06/30/2021
CalPERS Actuarial
Reports, Loan
Amortization Schedules,
CalPERS, and UAL
estimates
UAL and Debt Service
Payments only – no
normal cost
Safety & Misc Tier 1 only
Estimated add’l UAL
interest ≈ $3.65M

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review City of Cotati – UAL Update with 2022 Results 10/25/2022 13 UAL Policy Implementation Strategies:

ADPs for 90% Funded Level
• Current estimate ≈ $2,000,000
• ADPs could be made over several years
• Revisit in Sept / Oct 2023, after FY2023 results are known

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review 10/25/2022 14
Questions?
Dmitry Semenov
Ridgeline Municipal Strategies, LLC
(916) 250-1590
[email protected]
RidgelineMuni.com

11.A.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Cotati - 2022 Pension Analysis (Pension Unfunded Liability Policy Review Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: SAFE Program Expansion to Include Sonoma State University Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Damien O'Bid, City Manager
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into and execute a revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma State University and Petaluma People Services Center to Operate and Manage the Rohnert Park/Cotati SAFE Team (Specialized Assistance for Everyone) to provide crisis response services to our communities.

Background
In 1989, the City of Eugene, Oregon developed an innovative community-based public safety system to provide mental health first response for crises involving mental illness, homelessness, and addiction. As a result, the White Bird Clinic launched CAHOOTS (Crisis Assistance Helping Out On The Streets) as a community policing initiative.

The CAHOOTS model mobilizes two-person teams consisting of a medic (a nurse, paramedic, or EMT) and a crisis worker who has substantial training and experience in the mental health field.

The CAHOOTS teams deal with a wide range of mental health-related crises, including conflict resolution, welfare checks, substance abuse, suicide threats, and more, relying on traumainformed de-escalation and harm reduction techniques. They also can handle non-emergency medical issues, avoiding ambulance transport and emergency room treatment.

CAHOOTS staff are not law enforcement officers and do not carry weapons and are dispatched through 911 or through a non-emergency line for issues that do not involve an immediate safety threat to the individual in crisis or the general public.

After approval by the Cotati City Council, the City of Cotati (City), in partnership with Rohnert Park, launched a 12 hour per day crisis response team in November 2021. This has gradually grown to cover 18 hours per day, with the goal of eventually covering 24 hours per day. The program is run by Petaluma People Services (PPSC) and has been branded the “SAFE Team” (Specialized Assistance for Everyone) to align with the City of Petaluma’s pilot program that had already launched as the “SAFE Team”. This was intended to reduce public confusion over the

11.B
Packet Pg. 124
service.

Analysis/Discussion
After launch, Sonoma State University (SSU) approached the City to explore joining the Cotati/Rohnert Park SAFE Team. The City led the multi-party negotiations and was able to negotiate a revised MOU, which is attached to the resolution. If approved, it is believed that this is one of the first state universities to deploy a mobile mental health crisis team on campus.

The MOU identifies the roles and responsibilities of PPSC, the City of Rohnert Park, SSU and the City of Cotati. PPSC will provide the personnel, supplies, management and oversight of the program, while the City of Rohnert will provide and maintain the vehicle assigned to the SAFE Team. The revised MOU includes general clean up language throughout, including changes to terms to incorporate SSU, changes that allow operational details to be modified outside of the MOU (such as which agency maintains the vehicles), and how costs are determined as new agencies join. Previously, costs were set for the first 2 years and then would phase in based on actual call volumes. The proposed change only bases costs on estimated calls for the first year, and then starts averaging in actual calls in year 2. During negotiations, staff recognized that this is the first multi-agency mental health crisis team MOU in Sonoma County, so will likely be used as the template for program expansion.

While the pilot programs continue to build capacity, the County continues to also provide MST services, as needed. Additionally, the City of Santa Rosa is starting up their “In-Response” program, which is a different model from the CAHOOTS model used by Cotati/Rohnert Park and Petaluma.

Financial Considerations
Program Costs
From October 2021 through June 2022, the total cost of the SAFE team was approximately $350,000. The City’s share (currently 16%) was approximately $56,000. At 18 hours per day, the typical total monthly cost is approximately $75,000 (or $12,000 for Cotati). When the SAFE Team moves to 24 hours per day (anticipated to occur in January or February 2023), this cost will increase and is expected to be approximately $85,000 per month. Note that these are operating costs only and do not include purchase and upfit of the vehicles and related equipment, which are billed separately at the same percentages.

While the cost of the SAFE team does not offset existing costs, it can provide a more appropriate response for some types of calls, perform welfare checks, and transport individuals for treatment to free up police time for more pro-active policing work (traffic enforcement, etc.). Overall, it provides better local services for mental health and homelessness. The SAFE program also reduces local hospital costs by reducing non-covered emergency room visits with a more proactive intervention. As the program matures, seeking contributions from the local health systems to support the mental health crisis teams will be a priority.

11.B
Packet Pg. 125
The cost of the program, including the cost of the vehicles, vehicle maintenance, and fuel will be shared with Rohnert Park and SSU, based on the initial percentages in the MOU. In the second year, the costs will be phased into a two-year moving average of actual calls initiated by each City. Using this methodology, the initial split will be 78% cost share for Rohnert Park, a 6% share for SSU and a 16% cost share for Cotati. Each entity will be invoiced for its’ respective cost share separately by PPSC. Rohnert Park will invoice Cotati and SSU directly for the vehicle, vehicle maintenance, and fuel based on the same proportional split of costs.

The County of Sonoma is the conduit for all social service program funding locally (i.e. property taxes, etc.) as well as receipt of any State or Federal funds for this purpose. This program represents a change to this model by requiring the use of the City General Fund to support these types of services. It should be considered that a program like this, particularly beyond the pilot phase, would likely work best and be more cost efficient if regionalized. This would allow shared overhead, as well as potentially shared coverage regionally during off-peak hours. A regional program could also facilitate joint participation with local health care systems who would likely benefit by reduced non-covered emergency room visits.

Grant Funding
At this time, the City has received grants from the County in the first year of the program from Measure O (local mental health sales tax) and from the State Department of Health Services as part of a joint application with Rohnert Park, Petaluma, Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County.

Measure O granted to Cotati totals $68,480 for the start-up year only, with no future commitment of funds. Funding for the Cotati/Rohnert Park program from the State Department of Health Services is indicated in the table below, minus $85,000 deducted for County program management.

FY Year Grant
21-22 $ 179,667
22-23 $ 291,667
23-24 $ 264,333
24-25 $ 264,333
Total $ 1,000,000
The American Recovery Plan (ARP) funding may be available to offset a portion of the costs. It included funding with an 85% match for a Cahoots-type of program for 3 years. Funding is expected to pass through States that opt into the program. Important questions exist about this funding source include eligibility rules, primarily around when costs are reimbursable and what program elements are required to be eligible for coverage. Typically, Medicare only reimburses costs when working directly with an eligible patient, which could be important with potentially significant off-call time for the SAFE team. At this time, it is unknown if this will benefit the SAFE team, and in any event this funding will only be available for 3 years, at which time it is expected that the full costs will fall back to the local jurisdictions.

11.B
Packet Pg. 126
Environmental Issues
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

11.B
Packet Pg. 127
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTATI AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE A REVISED

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH PETALUMA PEOPLE

SERVICES CENTER, SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, AND THE CITY OF

ROHNERT PARK TO OPERATE AND MANAGE AN ALTERNATIVE CRISIS

RESPONSE PROGRAM KNOWN AS THE ROHNERT PARK-COTATI SPECIALIZED

ASSISTANCE FOR EVERYONE (SAFE) TEAM
WHEREAS, each year approximately 5% of all calls for service (Rohnert Park, Cotati, and Sonoma State University) are crisis calls involving homelessness, mental illness, or substance abuse which could be diverted to an alternative response team; and WHEREAS, alternative care providers are trained, suited, and equipped to deliver more cost effective and appropriate services related to mental health, substance abuse, and shelter and housing services to individuals in need, in lieu of police response to such calls for assistance; and WHEREAS, in November 2021, in accordance with a three-party Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Petaluma People Services Center (PPSC), a California non-profit public benefit corporation, implemented a pilot program with the City of Cotati and City of Rohnert Park to provide mobile mental health crisis services; and WHEREAS, the City of Cotati (City) in partnership with the City of Rohnert Park share the benefits of the services of the new crisis response team, Specialized Assistance For Everyone (SAFE), and share the costs of the program based on a cost share that is fair and reasonable, initially based on the respective number of anticipated calls for service to be responded to within each community and eventually phased into a 2 year rolling average of actual calls for service; and
WHEREAS, following the implementation of the SAFE Team in Cotati-Rohnert Park, the City led discussions with Sonoma State University (SSU) to expand the program to the SSU campus; and
WHEREAS, the action of entering into an MOU does not constitute a project as defined by California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378; therefore, no further environmental review is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cotati that it does hereby authorize the City Manager, to execute the revised MOU to include Sonoma State University in the joint mobile crisis response program with Petaluma People Services Center, City of Cotati and City of Rohnert Park, in substantially similar form as Exhibit A, subject to such revisions as may be approved by the City Attorney.

Packet Pg. 128
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cotati held on the October 25th, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

Approved:________________________________
Mayor
Attest:____________________________
Kevin Patterson, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to form:
____________________________
City Attorney
Attachments:

Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (PDF)
Packet Pg. 129

11.a
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU)

11.a
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Exhibit A: SAFE Team Revised MOU (SAFE Team Implementation w/SSU) Cotati City Council
Agenda Staff Report
Item type: REGULAR AGENDA (ACTION)
To: City Council
Subject: Consider approval of professional services agreements for environmental and preliminary design of the Highway 116 and West Cotati Avenue Intersection Improvements Project
Date: October 25, 2022
Written by: Craig Scott, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council of the City of Cotati adopt a resolution 1) approving a professional services agreement with Fehr & Peers to provide public outreach and preliminary design services for the Highway 116/West Cotati Avenue Intersection Safety Improvements Project, and 2) Approving a Professional Services Agreement with M-Group for providing Environmental Review services for the subject project
Background
The intersection of West Cotati Avenue and Highway 116 has long been a safety concern as it serves the west side of town and is off a busy two-lane highway. The City continues to pursue grant funds to improve the intersection and is included in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee Program.

The intersection was included in the Caltrans Hwy 116 Widening Project, for which plans were completed in 2009, and was to be improved with the South Sonoma Business Park. However, the Business Park did not get completed in its entirety and only improvements for the Lowes Development were completed.

Improving the intersection remains a priority for the City, and in 2021, the City included this Project as one of five projects submitted to the Sonoma County Transportation Authority to prioritize for grant opportunities. Additionally in 2021, the City completed its Local Road Safety Plan which identified the intersection improvements as a priority safety project. Recognizing the importance of the project, and prompted by the property being on the market, the City, in 2021, purchased the property on the southeast corner of West Cotati Avenue and Hwy 116. This property is needed to reconfigure the intersection.

Analysis/Discussion
Attached is a sketch of the planned reconfiguration of the West Cotati Avenue and Hwy 116 intersection, the proposed signalization, and general pathway configuration. There is potential funding from State and Federal grants and private development. For these funding sources to be realized, the scope of the project needs to be defined and environmental review completed. City

11.C
Packet Pg. 156
Staff is proposing the City contract with an environmental firm and engineering firm to prepare these documents.

The City has an on-call environmental services agreement with M-Group and has requested a scope of services for completing environmental review and biological analysis for the subject project. The scope of services would be included in a task order under that agreement. M-Group has provided the attached letter proposal and City Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it fair and reasonable.

In April 2021, City Staff issued a request for proposals and received proposals from sixteen engineering companies to provide a wide range of services including preliminary design for streets. City Staff selected Fehr & Peers as the most qualified consultant and requested a proposal to provide outreach and engagement and preliminary design of the intersection and related Highway 116 improvements. In the scoping process, the scope of the intersection was extended to widening Hwy 116 east to Redwood Drive and north to Alder Avenue. Final design of the intersection will be a separate phase once the full extent of work is known after review by Caltrans.

Fehr & Peers provided the attached Letter Proposal for the Hwy 116/West Cotati Avenue Reconfiguration Project and Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it to be fair and reasonable.

Financial Considerations
The City’s adopted FY22/23 Budget includes $5,000,000 for the Hwy 116/W Cotati Avenue Intersection Safety Improvements Project with $4,000,000 funded by Grants, $650,000 from the General Fund and the remainder from Special Revenues.

The 35 percent design contract for Fehr & Peers is an amount of $297,000 and the M-Group environmental review contract is for an amount of $74,150. This combined total of $371,150 in expenditures within the project is included within the budget so no budgetary adjustments are required at this time.

Future City funded efforts anticipated include the final design, grant application efforts, and construction related to the completion of the intersection.

Attachments:

F&P Scope of Work (PDF)
M-Group Scope of Work (PDF)
Pages from Cotati LRSP-Adopted (PDF)

11.C
Packet Pg. 157
140 Keller Street | Petaluma, CA 94592 | (707) 582-0039 | www.fehrandpeers.com Scope of Work
State Route 116/West Cotati Avenue Reconfiguration
Project
This scope of work includes effort to assist the City of Cotati (City) in developing a vision for a safer, connected, cohesive SR116 corridor from Alder Avenue to Redwood Drive and leading all or a portion of the design development and permitting phase of the corridor improvements. Our base scope of work will include development of a conceptual plan and preliminary engineering to help the City set expectations with adjacent developments and share with other stakeholder groups and processes such as the upcoming countywide active transportation plan. After the initial conceptual design and engineering work, we will continue to support the City as the adjacent developments also continue to advance their site design and frontage improvements. At this stage, Fehr & Peers’ role could include leading the design of the improvements in both the Caltrans right-of way along State Route 116 (SR116) but could shift to focus solely on the realignment of West Cotati Ave which is work fully in the City right-of-way. To support the City on this effort and remain flexible to the changing needs of the city and the overall program, we have developed a base scope of work and optional tasks based on the level of involvement our Fehr & Peers team will be involved in the final design phase of the overall program.

Base Scope of Work, consisting of the following:
• Project Initiation, Coordination and Meetings
• Data Collection & Review
• Concept Development
• Outreach & Engagement
• Preliminary Engineering
Once the preferred concept has been developed and finalized after stakeholder input, and the preferred concept is advanced to a 35% level of design, we have prepared optional scope of work tasks as follows:

A. Fehr & Peers to develop construction documents for work solely in the City right-of-way (assuming the work along SR116 will be completed by the respective developers on the north side of SR116 west and east of the realigned West Cotati Avenue.

B. Fehr & Peers to develop construction documents for work in the City right-of-way (realignment of West Cotati Avenue) and a new traffic signal at the new SR116/West

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 2 of 28 ends

Cotati Ave (with minimal widening to accommodate turns pockets and other geometric improvements required to complete the signalization of a new tee intersection.

C. Fehr & Peers to develop construction documents for the full widening of SR116 and work in the city right-of-way to include all proposed roadway and signal improvements from Alder Avenue to Redwood Drive.

Our detailed scope of work is described below.

Task 1: Project Initiation,
Coordination, & Meetings
This task includes project management and administration elements, including project scoping, invoicing, general coordination and regular meetings with city staff over the course of the base scope of work (Tasks 1 through 5). A description of the project efforts included in the task is described below.

1.1 Project Initiation, Kick-Off, & Virtual Site Visit
Fehr & Peers and our sub-consultants (“Design Team”) will prepare for and attend a project kickoff with City staff. At this meeting we will review the scope, schedule, roles, responsibilities, and set expectations for all team members related to scope, communication, roles, and responsibilities. Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft agenda for city review and will provide summary of the meeting minutes afterwards. During the kick-off meeting, we will conduct a virtual walkthrough of the project, discussing potential challenges, ideas, and a strategy to address any design or issues that we see as we initiate the effort. We anticipate this meeting to be a hybrid format, meaning some members will meet in person and others will join remotely. Fehr & Peers will coordinate with the City to ensure the meeting location has the capability to support this format, or we will modify the format to work all invitees. After the meeting, we will work with the City to make any scope of work refinements that may be needed.

1.2 Meetings & Coordination
We have included regular meetings, consisting of monthly project development team (PDT) meetings. The core attendees for this meeting will be the city lead and Fehr & Peers project manager, with other team members joining as the need arises. Fehr & Peers will develop the

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 3 of 28 ends

agenda ahead of each PDT meeting to ensure effective use of these check-in meetings. We also have included an allowance for other meetings and coordination on an as needed basis in this task.

1.3 Project Administration
This task includes an allowance for project administrative duties including invoicing, updating schedule, coordinating with team members, and city staff. The assumption for level of effort (in terms of hours by staff category) for this task is illustrated in our fee estimate.

1.4 Quality Control / Quality Assurance
The Fehr & Peers team will conduct an internal quality assurance review of all formal deliverables, including written memorandum, graphics, drawings, and construction documents. Fehr & Peers’ quality assurance program requires an independent review of all construction documents by experienced staff. The quality assurance review provides oversight to specific project details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, to confirm the constructability, costeffectiveness and completeness of construction documents relative to the normal standard of professional care.

Task 1 Deliverables
• Meeting agenda for kick-off meeting
• Meeting minutes from kick-off meeting
• Monthly invoices with project report notes
Task 2: Data Collection & Review
This task includes an assessment of current conditions in the project vicinity, including a review of readily data and adopted plans, collection and review of new traffic data, and exhibits to illustrate basic project needs, opportunities, and details

2.1 Review Available Data
We will review readily available traffic count data including the most recent development applications and project descriptions of the proposed development projects along SR-116 and the Project vicinity. We will review readily available crash data (e.g. SWITRS and TASAS data) for

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 4 of 28 ends

up to the previous five years to understand crash history in the Project vicinity. We will review the City’s adopted General Plan, relevant Specific Plans, Local Road Safety Plan, and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. It is assumed that traffic count data will be available from adjacent development projects and thus no new traffic count data is included in our base scope of work.

2.2 Develop Maps & Exhibits
Fehr & Peers will develop a series of maps and exhibits illustrating the Project limits, opportunities and constraints, existing transportation facilities/connections, and other features to illustrate the Project context and additional input to inform future alternatives to consider. It is anticipated that these materials will be used in future meetings with stakeholders and the community, as well as in the various memorandums and reports required as part of future tasks.

2.3 Documentation
We will summarize the findings from Task 2.1 and the exhibits from Task 2.2 in a short memorandum.

Task 2 Deliverables
• Project Maps & Exhibits
Task 3: Concept Development

3.1 Develop Alternatives
Working with the City and our Design Team, we will develop a matrix of potential roadway and intersection configurations for the SR-116, West Cotati Avenue realignment, and proposed new driveway to the Redwood Row and Cotati Villages developments. We will explore several combinations of geometric configurations, lane configuration, bicycle and pedestrian facility types, and intersection traffic control devices. We will provide a qualitative assessment of the feasibility and appropriateness of the various combinations of inputs. While we anticipate a traditional four-legged intersection and new traffic signal is the likely most feasible option (per General Plan and Local Road Safety Plan recommendations), this matrix will provide the City and Design team to rule out other intersection traffic control devices, which will also help to address Caltrans requirements as part of an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Report.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 5 of 28 ends

We will provide our initial matrix to the city for review, with a meeting to present the findings or discuss the findings after the City has a chance to review. As a follow-up from this meeting, we will choose up to three concepts to explore in more detail.

3.2 Traffic Analysis
Once up to three alternatives have been identified, Fehr & Peers will analyze each alternative for Existing Conditions, the Opening Year and the Design Year (20 years after the opening year), to help identify the preferred alternative and to meet the requirements for Caltrans approval and the need to demonstrate project benefits through the design life of the project.

3.3 Concept Drawings (10% Level Design)
After the above analysis, we will develop conceptual drawings of up to three alternatives, including a plan view, typical cross-sections, and relevant imagery of similar facilities. These concept exhibits will be used as part of stakeholder outreach to make progress towards a selected alternative. This submittal will include sufficient information for each potential alternative to meet with key stakeholders to assist in the selection of a preferred alternative to carry forward into final design (Task 7).

Task 3 Deliverables
• Table/Matrix of Potential Alternatives
• Concept Drawings (Draft and Final)
Task 4: Outreach & Engagement
This task includes outreach to key stakeholders and the broader community with the objective to refine the project alternatives and select a preferred alternative to take to a 35% design level.

4.1 Outreach Plan
Based on discussions during the kick-off meeting, Fehr & Peers will develop an outreach and engagement plan, including a more detailed description of activities by the Design Team and city staff through throughout the planning process. This will include a description of the proposed format, frequency, and content of meetings with key stakeholders and the broader community.

During the kick-off meeting we will discuss key stakeholders to be included in the Project

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 6 of 28 ends

outreach and engagement activities. Some of the key stakeholders that this could include are as follows:
• City Staff (multiple departments)
• Caltrans
• Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA)
• Development Groups (Redwood Row, Cotati Villages) and other affected property owners • Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition (and other active transportation advocacy groups) • Sonoma County Transit
• Rancho Adobe Fire District
• Thomas Page Academy

4.2 Stakeholder Interviews & Workshops
After we have collected data and initiated Task 3 work, we propose to engage with key stakeholders (one-on-one or in small groups) to ask questions and seek input about perceptions about roadway changes and what factors should be considered as part of intersection and corridor configuration. The amount of workshops is not known, but the level of effort (in terms of staff hours) assumed for these probative conversations are shown in our fee estimate. At the end of all the interviews/workshops, we will summarize comments received in a memorandum and use this input to inform potential design elements in our Task 3 work.

4.3 Community Engagement
After alternatives are identified, preliminarily screened, and are considered feasible from an engineering and capital cost-perspective, we will organize a community meeting to present the work to date. The meeting will be intended to provide the broader community with an overview of the project objectives, and a presentation of these potential improvements. We will solicit input from the community during the meeting and leverage the City’s Cleargov project page (administered by City staff) to allow for the public to subscribe to updates about project progress and future meetings. To the extent feasible, community comments will further inform alternatives and will be integrated into Task 4 efforts.

Once an alternative has been selected, Fehr & Peers will provide the concept design the key stakeholders and make available to the broader community (via City’s Project website). We will present the selected alternative to one more community meeting, with the expectation that some minor comments will be provided that can inform the project improvements during the final design phase.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 7 of 28 ends

Task 4 Deliverables
• Outreach Plan
• List of questions/topics for stakeholder interviews (draft and final) • Materials for community meetings (draft and final)
Task 5: Preliminary Engineering
The following includes the effort required to prepare 35% design level plans for the preferred alternative selected and approved as part of previous tasks described above. This includes survey, basemapping, and formal right-of-way research on Caltrans and City right-of-way, to advance the project concept to a level of completeness to fulfill Caltrans requirements and serve as the basis of final design. It is assumed the results of this task will be used in • Packaged up and be provided to the developers of advance to projects for final design for SR116
• Serve as the basis for a final design process led by the Fehr & Peers team • Used as the basis to seek grant funding

5.1 Surveying, Basemapping, and Right of Way Research
The following includes aerial, right-of-way, and topographic surveys necessary to serve as the basis of our engineering efforts, consistent with Caltrans requirements for such work.

5.1.1 Aerial Base Mapping
Mark Thomas will perform a field survey to establish control to facilitate topographic surveys of the site. Inter-visible local project horizontal control (NAD83) and vertical control (NAVD88) will be established within each segment based on existing monument networks and benchmarks.

Control point coordinates, basis of bearings and coordinates, and benchmark notes will be provided to show on final plans.

Mark Thomas field crews will also set flight panels to control the aerial mapping efforts. Once aerial targets are set the Aerial Consultant will fly the project to capture the aerial imagery. Mark Thomas will process the data from the field survey and provide coordinate values to the Aerial Consultant to perform aerial triangulation. Once aerial triangulation is complete aerial mapping will be performed and will serve as the base map sufficient to facilitate design efforts of the Highway Widening. Mapping will be compiled at a scale of 1" = 50' with a 1-foot contour interval.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 8 of 28 ends

Mark Thomas will perform field surveys for photo controls for mapping. It is assumed that photo control will fall within Caltrans right of way and it is assumed access to Caltrans right of way, traffic control and encroachment permits will be needed for this portion of the field survey efforts.

Two (2) days of Traffic Control are included in this scope of work.

All work conducted as part of this task will be consistent with Caltrans requirements for such efforts, and will set up the project to meet the requirements of Caltrans’ ABC process should Caltrans require that at a later date.

Additional surveying efforts, including the collection of supplemental ground shots is not included in our base scope of work.

5.1.2 Right of Way Survey
Mark Thomas will perform a field survey to locate the necessary monumentation to establish the Right of Way lines of State Route 116, W Cotati Avenue, Alder Avenue and Redwood Drive. Our research indicates that Parcel Maps (PM), Records of Survey (RS) & Tract Maps (TM) are publicly available from the Sonoma County Surveyors office will be sufficient to complete this survey. It is our understanding that no other monument ties to other maps will be necessary to complete this project other than those publicly available. Should a material discrepancy be found or evidence of a dispute with adjoiners be discovered, Mark Thomas will stop work under the current scope and discuss options with the City to move forward. Once the locations of the Right of Way lines are established based on the field evidence collected, Mark Thomas will plot this boundary in a CAD file that will serve as the basis for design. Mark Thomas assumes current title reports will be required to show the locations of easements. Mark Thomas has included the acquisition of 12 preliminary title reports at a cost of $1,000 per report. Only easements shown in the title reports will be mapped. It is assumed that boundary evidence necessary to define the boundary will be readily available. This Boundary Survey scope is limited to two (2) days of fieldwork.

It is assumed no right of way or easement acquisitions will be required for the project.

5.1.3 Existing Utility Mapping & Investigations
Mark Thomas will use USA North to retrieve a list of utilities that may be affected by the project.

Based on the list Mark Thomas will send out utility request letters ("A" letters). Mark Thomas will then create and update a utility matrix for the project to track the status of record requests. Mark Thomas will take the provided utility mapping and compile it into a utility base map to facilitate design efforts. Underground utility mark out and detection is excluded under this scope of work.

Mark Thomas will prepare a potholing exhibit for City and Caltrans approval. It is assumed we will need up to 10 potholes within the project limits and have provided a budget of $2,000 per

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 9 of 28 ends

pothole for underground locating services. The actual cost of potholing will be determined once the actual locations and required number of potholes are determined, prior to the actual work being performed. Mark Thomas will provide a survey field crew to survey the location of potholed utilities and provide the horizontal and vertical location of the reference points set by others (potholer). This scope of work is limited to two (2) days of field work. It is assumed that field crews will mobilize after all potholes have been completed.

5.2 Prepare 35% Plans & Cost Estimate
35% Plans will be prepared in general conformance with Caltrans drafting and design standards as is appropriate for 35% design. 35% plans will be prepared to confirm project geometrics and major design features so that once confirmed, the major design elements may be detailed efficiently and effectively at later design stages without costly redesign and/or project delay. To this end, the 35% plans will focus on the major physical improvements (layout and alignment of lanes, turn pockets, striping, and intersection improvements). Plans will be cut and drafted focusing on the gross level physical improvements without detail, enabling the identification of primary construction elements and bid items. Roadway plans (layout, typical cross section, pavement delineation) will show proposed roadway, bicycle and pedestrian improvements. No specifications will be prepared with this task. We will prepare a cost estimate of probable costs using Caltrans cost data and typical Caltrans pay items.

The 35% plan set is an abbreviated submittal, and is anticipated to include the following sheets:
• Title page
• Typical cross sections
• Layouts
• Profiles (as necessary)
• Drainage system layout
• Existing utility plan
• Pavement delineation
Task 5 Deliverables
• Aerial Survey (dwg and pdf format)
• Right of Way Mapping (dwg and pdf format)

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 10 of 28 ends

Task 6: Final Design & Permitting
Task 6 includes the effort to lead or support the development of final design and permitting phase of the project. The following include three different strategies for our Task 6 efforts.

Strategy A assumes that after the completion of 35% plans and estimate, the City and adjacent developments will agree that development teams of the parcels on the north side of SR116 will develop construction documents and secure Caltrans permit approval for the widening and reconfiguration of SR116 along their project frontages. Under this strategy, Fehr & Peers would prepare final design documents for work in the City right-of-way only, which consists of a realigned West Cotati Avenue. We will coordinate with the adjacent development projects to confirm to the respective design plans for the realigned West Cotati Avenue and the reconfigured SR116 corridor. Under this Strategy, Fehr & Peers would not have a role in the Caltrans review and approval process.

Strategy B assumes that after the completion of 35% plans and estimate, the City and adjacent development teams will agree that the City and their consultant team (Fehr & Peers) will develop the full set of construction documents for the corridor improvements within the state right-of-way and city right-of-way, and work with City and Caltrans to seek permit approval for all improvements included therein in state right-of-way. Under this Strategy, Fehr & Peers would lead the Caltrans review and approval process for all improvements in the state right-of-way. This strategy would also work
Strategy C assumes that after the completion of 35% plans and estimate, the City will advance a set of construction documents that realigns West Cotati Ave and a new traffic signal, with the minimum amount of widening and reconfiguration of SR116 and a new traffic signal at the new SR116/West Cotati Ave (with widening to accommodate turns pockets and other geometric improvements required to complete the signalization of a new tee intersection). Under this Strategy, Fehr & Peers would lead the Caltrans review and approval process for all improvements in the state right-of-way.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 11 of 28 ends

Task 6: Final Design & Permitting (Strategy A)
This task includes preparation of construction documents, (plans, specifications, and estimate, or PS&E) of the realigned West Cotati Avenue roadway. It is assumed that the limits of the design work will stop south of the Caltrans right-of-way, and another project design package (prepared by others) will include design to complete the connection to SR116, including any roadway widening, signalization, and other features Caltrans would require as part of the work in the state right-of-way.

6.1 Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E)
The Fehr & Peers team will develop the required documents to design and gain approval for the project improvements. This task shall include development of the project plans, specifications, bid item schedule and construction cost estimates at the following stages of project development:
• 65% (unchecked detailed design)
• 95% (checked detailed design)
• 100% (draft final bid documents)
PS&E will be prepared consistent with Caltrans standard plans and specifications. At each stage of plan development, the team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from the City. Each design submittal shall incorporate comments received on the previous submittal. The team shall perform an internal, interdisciplinary QA/QC plan check and review as part of each submittal stage. General cross-sections are not included in this scope.

6.1.2 65% PS&E (Unchecked Detailed Design)
Task shall include updating 35% plans and creating and developing plan details not included in the 35% submittal.

The team will prepare 65% technical specifications. Technical specifications shall be prepared as special provisions using Caltrans 2018 Standard Specifications format and will be draft specifications at the 65% submittal stage. We shall utilize Caltrans standard special provisions (SSPs) except where they are unavailable or when the City provides alternative standard special provisions. Specification edits shall not follow Caltrans Office Engineer editing format (i.e. Caltrans editing macros and hidden text). No justification or approvals for non-conforming edits will be provided (i.e. no NSSP approvals shall be required or sought).

Using Caltrans standard bid items and measurement quantities, the team shall quantify the required bid item quantities for elements of work shown on the 65% plans and as specified in the 65% special provisions. Unit bid price estimates will be based upon appropriate recently

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 12 of 28 ends

published bid prices as posted on Caltrans website and other recent, relevant local agency project bids.

6.1.3 95% PS&E (Checked Detailed Design)
95% PS&E will be prepared as a checked, detailed, complete set of plans, technical specifications and estimate. The tea will provide responses to comments and attend a comment review/ resolution meeting at the outset of the 95% PS&E task.

The team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from City, Caltrans and other approving/ commenting agencies on the 65% submittal.

Task shall include updating 65% and incorporating comments received, checking details and further developing unresolved details or design issues not resolved as part of the 65% submittal.

Task shall include preparation of all plans as described above except electrical plans.

Fehr & Peers will revise the 65% plans and prepare the traffic signal plans and special provisions as part of the 95% PS&E.

The team shall prepare 95% technical specifications by editing and revising the 65% technical specifications.

The team shall prepare an updated quantity calculation takeoff based upon the 95% plans and specifications and will update unit prices as appropriate.

6.1.4 100% PS&E (Draft Final Bid Documents)
100% PS&E will be prepared as draft final set of bid ready, complete bid documents. The team will provide responses to comments and attend a comment review/resolution meeting at the outset of the 100% PS&E task.

The team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from City, Caltrans and other approving/ commenting agencies on the 95% submittal.

Task shall include updating the 95% PS&E, incorporating comments received. Th the team shall prepare an updated quantity calculation takeoff based upon the 100% plans and specifications and update unit prices as appropriate. This scope assumes that the team will provide the City a complete set of technical specifications only for incorporation with the City’s boilerplate bid documents.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 13 of 28 ends

Task 6: Final Design & Permitting (Strategy B)
This task includes preparation of construction documents, (plans, specifications, and estimate, or PS&E) of the selected alternative, including additional engineering studies required for Caltrans approval, and supplemental studies Caltrans will require before approving improvements in the state right-of-way.

6.1 Supplemental Survey & Mapping
Supplemental Survey
Mark Thomas will perform field surveys to collect pertinent accessible above ground features that will be located and documented to augment the aerial survey using conventional ground survey techniques. Ground visible features to be captured include, but are not limited to sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveways, curb ramps, fences, private utilities, storm and sewer facilities, trees, street lighting, signing, striping, and markings within the project limits. Storm and sewer will be dipped to determine invert elevations and pipe diameters within the streets around the site. Field crews will rely upon markings on utility feature lids. No utilities will be dipped other than sewer and storm. Detailed topographic surveys are limited to five (5) days of field work.

Caltrans ABC Mapping Process
As a supplemental service (if required), Mark Thomas can process the mapping through the Caltrans A-B-C process. As part of the Caltrans A-B-C process, Mark Thomas will submit an “A” letter to Caltrans for approval. Based upon the approval from Caltrans we will utilize the requested datum, however it is anticipated that the Horizontal datum will be CCS 83, Epoch 2017.50 (California Coordinate System, North America Datum, 1983) and vertical datum to be NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988). The proposed photo control layout would be submitted to Caltrans as part of the A-B-C mapping submittal and secure approval prior to actual commencement of field work. Once the GPS survey to establish horizontal and vertical controls has been performed, Mark Thomas will submit a GPS report to Caltrans as part of A-B-C mapping process and secure approval from Caltrans for Submittal B. Once the aerial flight to collect photography has been performed and the subsequent mapping prepared, the mapping will be digitally compiled in AutoCAD and/or MicroStation formats to conform to Caltrans’ A-B-C mapping process and submitted for approval.

6.2 Engineering Studies
This task includes technical studies and additional engineering data collection and reporting to serve as the basis of our engineering design efforts, including what will be required as part of the Caltrans review and approval process.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 14 of 28 ends

6.2.1 Geotechnical Design and Materials Report
Crawford & Associates (“Crawford”) will prepare a Geotechnical Design and Materials Report (GDMR) per Caltrans Requirements for the proposed improvements along Gravenstein Highway/SR 116 between Alder Avenue and Redwood Drive.

Coordination, Field Preparation, Permitting
Crawford will complete the following:
• Coordinate and discuss the project design needs, goals, and schedule with the design team.
• Review available project site information/data.
• Visit the site to assess drill equipment access and meet with property owners, as needed. • Schedule drilling with a C-57 licensed contractor.
• Coordinate with surveyors to mark boring locations prior to field exploration. • Obtain County well/boring permits and encroachment permits. • Visit the site to review marked boring locations and mark the site for USA North 811 member clearance.

Field Exploration and Testing
Crawford will drill, log and sample borings along the planned roadway improvements to depths ranging from 10 to 35 feet deep. The borings will be located within the pavement to measure the existing structural sections and along the paved and unpaved shoulders (where utilities allow) to evaluate the condition of the subgrade.

A Crawford field engineer/geologist will direct the sampling and log the explorations. Generally, samples will be collected at 2- to 5-foot intervals, as directed by the field engineer/geologist.

Samples will be collected in sealed containers and transferred to Crawford’s lab once field work is complete. The drilling contractor will advance the borings with a truck-mounted drill rig using 4- to 8-inch-diameter solid and/or hollow stem augers. Standard Penetration Test and/or California Modified sampling will be performed within the borings to obtain samples and blow count information.

At completion, the borings will be backfilled per the county well/boring and encroachment permit requirements.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 15 of 28 ends

Laboratory Testing
Crawford will complete the following laboratory tests, as appropriate, on representative samples obtained during field exploration: unit weight moisture content, sieve analysis, fines content, Atterberg Limits index testing for soil classification, expansion potential, and R-value.

Engineering Analysis and Report
The Draft Geotechnical Design and Materials Report will include the following:
• Purpose and introduction;
• Project and site description;
• Exploration and laboratory testing summary;
• Existing pavement condition and structural section;
• Regional geology and soil survey mapping;
• Subsurface conditions (soil types, infiltration rates, groundwater, corrosion potential); • Seismic hazards (fault rupture, ground motions, liquefaction potential); • Geotechnical conclusions and design recommendations regarding the proposed roadway widening, fill placement, subgrade preparation;
• New pavement sections recommendations and rehabilitation options; • Construction considerations for the proposed roadway; • Limitations of report;
• Figures (vicinity map, geologic map, soil survey map, fault map, exploration map); • Boring logs; and
• Laboratory test results.

A final report will be submitted following receipt of draft report comments from the Design Team.

Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to the above scope of geotechnical engineering services:
• Rights of Entry (ROE) if needed will be coordinated and obtained by others. • Caltrans encroachment permit will be required.
• Exploration locations will be marked by Crawford for USA North 811 underground utility clearance. Caltrans typically does not mark their utilities, so we have included a private utility locator in our scope and fee.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 16 of 28 ends

• The borings will be backfilled according to the County well/boring and encroachment permit requirements.
• The borings completed within the pavement will be back filled with dyed black concrete, the placement of hot mix asphalt is not included in our scope of services and if required will be completed by others.
• Drill cuttings are assumed non-hazardous and will be either placed back in the borehole or spread on the ground surface around the borehole.

6.2.2 Hazardous Materials Services
Based on our understanding of the provided information and our familiarity with similar projects, we propose to prepare a Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment (ISA) to help identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) and hazardous materials conditions that might affect the project. In addition to the ISA, we propose to conduct a limited Preliminary Site Assessment (PSA) to assess if aerial deposited lead is present at concentrations above their hazardous waste thresholds.

Initial Site Assessment (ISA)
The ISA will include the following elements:
• Records Review: Crawford will contract with Environmental Risk Information Service (ERIS) to conduct a computerized search of federal, state, local, and tribal environmental agency database records. These database records will be reviewed for information pertaining to the project site and properties within ASTM standard search radii applicable to each database.
• Physical Site Review: The ISA will include a summary of geologic and hydrogeologic conditions underlying the project.
• Historical Land Use Review: ERIS will provide historical aerial photographs and historical USGS topographic maps for the project site and vicinity. Crawford will review these to develop a history of general property uses for the project site and surrounding parcels. • Site Reconnaissance: Crawford will perform a walking reconnaissance of the project alignment to identify visual evidence of current or past uses of the project alignment and adjacent properties, including visual evidence of the following: above or below ground fuel storage tanks, vehicle maintenance areas, oil and gas operations, dump sites, discolored soils or stressed vegetation, surface discharge of fluids, stockpiled soil, discharges, odors, transformers, wells, standing water, hazardous substance containers or unidentified containers, etc. A driving reconnaissance (windshield survey) will observe conditions at other propertied in the area to identify conditions that might affect the project alignment.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 17 of 28 ends

• Interviews - Where warranted by the research and observation, Crawford will make reasonable attempts conduct interviews with persons identified as knowledgeable about potentially contaminated facilities adjacent to the project site. Interviews may be conducted in person, by telephone, or in writing. Individuals interviewed might include owners, occupants, local government officials, or others.

Assumptions
The scope of work described below is intended to be a reconnaissance-level effort; it is not intended to fully characterize or delineate the lateral or vertical extent of hazardous concentrations or environmental impact.

The Records review does not include Chain-of-title research and/or review.

Preliminary Site Assessment (PSA)
The current routes of SR 116 and 101 have been utilized throughout the period of leaded gasoline usage (1920s into the early 1980s). Use of leaded gasoline may have resulted in deposition of aerially deposited lead (ADL) along the roadways at concentrations that now exceed hazardous waste thresholds. Crawford will collect samples along the alignment to determine if aerial deposited lead is present.

Crawford proposes to collect soil samples for lead analysis at ten locations along the project alignment, five along each side of the street. At each sample location, discrete soil samples will be collected at depths of 0 to 0.5 feet, 1.0 to 1.5 feet, and 2.0 to 2.5 feet below ground surface. All soil samples will be analyzed for total lead; for budgeting purposes, we assume that thirty percent of the soil samples will require additional analysis for soluble lead (WET and TLCP methods). We further assume that ten percent of the soil samples will be analyzed for pH.

Soil samples will be collected using a hand auger to advance the sample boring and collect the soil samples. Soil samples will be delivered to the lab for analysis. Following receipt of all analytical data, Crawford will prepare a PSA report that includes, but may not necessarily be limited to, the following:
• Sample collections methods;
• Summary of analytical laboratory results;
• Comparison of analytical results to applicable hazardous waste limits; and • Maps documenting locations where samples are collected.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 18 of 28 ends

Assumptions
• No encroachment permit will be required to complete this work in the shoulder using hand equipment.
• Work can be completed in the shoulder, without use of a traffic control contractor. • This is a screening level effort and is not necessarily intended to fully characterize the lateral or vertical extent of any impact encountered.

The above testing program was developed based on our experience with similar projects; additional testing for other constituents of concern may be warranted based on the findings of the ISA.

6.3 Construction Documents (PS&E)
The Fehr & Peers team will develop the required documents to design and gain approval for the project improvements. This task shall include development of the project plans, specifications, bid item schedule and construction cost estimates at the following stages of project development:
• 65% (unchecked detailed design)
• 95% (checked detailed design)
• 100% (draft final bid documents)
PS&E will be prepared consistent with the Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual, Drafting Standards, and Highway Design Manual as well as City standards, design criteria and other codes as appropriate for a locally sponsored, funded encroachment permit project utilizing the Caltrans Streamlined DEER Process. Our anticipating sheet types and count is shown below:

Sheet Count Sheet Type
1 Title
3 Typical Sections
1 Key Map
1 Survey Control Diagram
2 Layouts
10 Construction Details
3 Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans and Details
2 Erosion Control Plan and Quantities
2 Drainage Layouts
2 Drainage Profiles
2 Drainage Details
1 Drainage Quantities
2 Utility Plan

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 19 of 28 ends

2 Stage Construction
4 Traffic Handling
2 Construction Area Signs
2 Pavement Delineation and Sign Plans
4 Pavement Delineation and Sign Quantities
6 Signal and Lighting Plans and Details
10 Landscape and Irrigation Plans and Details
2 Summary of Quantities
64 Total
At each stage of plan development, the team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from the City, Caltrans and other approving/ commenting agencies. Each design submittal shall incorporate comments received on the previous submittal. The team shall perform an internal, interdisciplinary QA/QC plan check and review as part of each submittal stage.

General cross-sections are not included in this scope.

6.3.1 65% PS&E (Unchecked Detailed Design)
Task shall include updating 35% plans and creating and developing plan details not included in the 35% submittal.

6.3.2 95% PS&E (Checked Detailed Design)
95% PS&E will be prepared as a checked, detailed, complete set of plans, technical specifications and estimate. The tea will provide responses to comments and attend a comment review/ resolution meeting at the outset of the 95% PS&E task.

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 20 of 28 ends

The team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from City, Caltrans and other approving/ commenting agencies on the 65% submittal.

Task shall include updating 65% and incorporating comments received, checking details and further developing unresolved details or design issues not resolved as part of the 65% submittal.

Task shall include preparation of all plans as described above except electrical plans.

Fehr & Peers will revise the 65% plans and prepare the traffic signal plans and special provisions as part of the 95% PS&E.

The team shall prepare 95% technical specifications by editing and revising the 65% technical specifications.

The team shall prepare an updated quantity calculation takeoff based upon the 95% plans and specifications and will update unit prices as appropriate.

6.3.3 100% PS&E (Draft Final Bid Documents)
100% PS&E will be prepared as draft final set of bid ready, complete bid documents. The team will provide responses to comments and attend a comment review/resolution meeting at the outset of the 100% PS&E task.

The team will review, respond and resolve to all comments received from City, Caltrans and other approving/ commenting agencies on the 95% submittal.

Task 6 Deliverables
• 65% PS&E
• 95% PS&E and Response to Comments from 65% Submittal
• 100% PS&E and Response to Comments from 95% Submittal • Drainage Report
• Storm Water Data Report
• Transportation Management Plan

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 21 of 28 ends

6.4 Caltrans Coordination, Studies, & Permitting
This task includes the engineering studies and supplemental reports that we expect to be required for project approval. These studies will likely be required to be prepared before the start of the development of PS&E and some will be prepared at the same time as we are developing PS&E for the project

6.4.1 Pre-Permit Screening & Meeting
We assume this Project will be subject to a Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) process.

This is the applicable Caltrans process assuming the following bullets are all met with the project:
• Project has approved environmental document (Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion, Negative Declaration, EIR, EIS etc.) or project is categorically exempted/excluded by CEQA and/or NEPA and has completed studies or public outreach. • Project only has a Single-Build Alternative
• Project does not require CTC action
• Project doesn’t involve any ROW conveyances from the Department to the local agencies (e.g. dedications, relinquishments, modifications to State ROW limits, etc.) • Project doesn’t require FHWA approval for Relinquishments or NPRCs involving a modification to the access control
• Project doesn’t involve construction of new structures or bridge widenings Upon initiation of Task 6, the Fehr & Peers Team will schedule and attend a meeting with Caltrans to verify the project is subject to a DEER process. At this meeting, we will present our approach to deliver the technical studies identified in below and clarify any scope of work and process related items necessary to secure Caltrans approval for the project improvements.

6.4.2 Design Engineering Evaluation Report
The Fehr & Peers Team will prepare the draft DEER document using the template provided by Caltrans on their website here: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/trafficoperations/documents/encroachment-permits/ep-qmap-attachment-4-a11y.pdf It is expected that this will require the following supplemental studies to be included with our DEER:
• Vicinity and Location Map (prepared as part of this sub-task) • Plan Set (Developed as part of Task 6.3)
• Right-of-Way Data Sheet (assumes no right-of-way acquisition)

11.C.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: F&P Scope of Work (Hww 116 & W Cotati Ave Intersection Improvements Design PSA) Craig Scott, City of Cotati
September 21, 2022

Page 22 of 28 ends

Cotati City CouncilOctober 25, 2022

Cotati City Council
October 25, 2022