City of Cudahy
Appropriations Limit (GANN) Computation
Fiscal Year 2021/2022
Population Change:
City (0.78) %
Per Capital Income Change: 5.73 %
Population Change Converted
to a Ratio 0.9922
Per Capita Income Change Converted
to a Ratio 1.0573
Calculation of Growth Factor
(0.9922 X 1.0573) 1.0491
2020-2021 Appropriation Limit $ 33,143,215
2021-2022 Appropriation Limit
($33,143,215 X 1.0491) $ 34,770,547
Attachment A Page 275 of 286
RESOLUTION NO. 22-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF
THE CITY OF CUDAHY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ON REVENUES AND
EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2021-2022
WHEREAS, the Gann Spending Limitation Initiative added Article XIIIB of the California Constitution restricts the amount of revenue that a governmental entity can appropriate in any fiscal year and provides for an annual increase based on inflation and population growth; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 7900 et seq. provides for the implementation of Article XIIIB by defining various terms and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions, including the establishment each year of an appropriations limit by the governing body of each local jurisdiction.; and WHEREAS, Proposition 111, passed in June 1990, modified Article XIIIB by changing the adjustment factors used to compute an appropriations limit and allowing each entity to choose annually between these factors; and
WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Finance has provided the following data for the establishment of the City's appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2021-2022:
POPULATION CALIFORNIA
City County PER CAPITA INCOME
-0.78% -0.89% +5.73%
WHEREAS, the required computation to determine the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 appropriations limit for the City of Cudahy has been performed by the State Department of Finance and Is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUDAHY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution:
(1) the adjustment factors chosen to calculate the City's appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 were: a) the change in County-wide population (-0.78%) and b) the change in California per capita income (5.73%); and (2) the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 is hereby established in the amount of $34,770,547.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
Attachment B Page 276 of 286
Resolution No. 22-10
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cudahy at a regular meeting on this 1st day of March 2022.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Richard Iglesias
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF CUDAHY )
I, Richard Iglesias, City Clerk of the City of Cudahy, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-10 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Cudahy, signed by the Mayor and attested by the Deputy City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of March 2022, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Richard Iglesias
City Clerk
Resolution No. 22-10
EXHIBIT A –
MAY 2021 STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PRICE AND POPULATION INFORMATION
May 2021
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance (Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2021, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2021-22. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2021-22 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.
Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2021.
Please Note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal income change is based on historical data. Given the stay-at-home orders due to COVID-19, growth in the coming years may be substantially lower than recent trends.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.
KEELY MARTIN BOSLER
Director
By:
Erika Li
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2021
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2021-22 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2021-22 5.73
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2021-22 appropriation limit.
2021-22:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.73 percent
Population Change = -0.46 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 5.73 + 100 = 1.0573 100
Population converted to a ratio: -0.46 + 100 = 0.9954
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2021-22: 1.0573 x 0.9954 = 1.0524
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2021 and Total Population, January 1, 2021 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 2020-2021 1-1-20 1-1-21 1-1-2021
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills -0.69 20,599 20,457 20,457
Alhambra -0.38 86,588 86,258 86,258
Arcadia -0.28 57,820 57,660 57,660
Artesia -0.70 16,514 16,398 16,484
Avalon -0.80 4,005 3,973 3,973
Azusa -0.44 49,805 49,587 49,587
Baldwin Park -0.59 76,388 75,935 75,935
Bell -0.43 36,475 36,319 36,319
Bellflower -0.58 77,909 77,458 77,458
Bell Gardens -0.67 42,518 42,233 42,233
Beverly Hills -0.78 33,660 33,399 33,399
Bradbury -1.04 1,056 1,045 1,045
Burbank -0.54 104,535 103,969 103,969
Calabasas 0.76 24,157 24,341 24,341
Carson -0.49 92,121 91,668 91,668
Cerritos -0.43 50,262 50,048 50,048
Claremont -0.47 35,877 35,707 35,707
Commerce -0.74 12,888 12,792 12,792
Compton -0.68 98,447 97,775 97,775
Covina -0.13 48,899 48,833 48,833
Cudahy -0.78 23,937 23,750 23,750
Culver City 0.05 39,785 39,805 39,805
Diamond Bar -0.65 57,088 56,717 56,717
Downey -0.68 112,186 111,425 111,425
Duarte -0.34 21,531 21,457 21,457
El Monte -0.35 116,876 116,465 116,465
El Segundo -0.53 16,749 16,660 16,660
Gardena -0.64 60,732 60,344 60,344
Glendale -0.27 204,392 203,834 203,834
Glendora -0.65 51,879 51,540 51,540
Hawaiian Gardens -0.71 14,571 14,467 14,467
Hawthorne -0.65 87,571 86,999 86,999
Hermosa Beach -0.77 19,601 19,451 19,451
Hidden Hills 0.63 1,901 1,913 1,913
Huntington Park -0.67 59,337 58,937 58,937
Industry -0.23 428 427 427
Inglewood -0.69 110,925 110,159 110,159
Irwindale -0.07 1,442 1,441 1,441
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2021 and Total Population, January 1, 2021 Total
County Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population City 2020-2021 1-1-20 1-1-21 1-1-2021
La Canada Flintridge -0.78 20,352 20,194 20,194
La Habra Heights -0.33 5,469 5,451 5,451
Lakewood -0.67 80,757 80,218 80,218
La Mirada -0.65 48,947 48,631 48,631
Lancaster -0.12 157,696 157,504 161,372
La Puente -0.67 40,358 40,087 40,087
La Verne -0.69 33,313 33,084 33,084
Lawndale -0.50 32,873 32,710 32,710
Lomita -0.73 20,582 20,431 20,431
Long Beach -0.91 471,975 467,684 467,730
Los Angeles -1.29 3,973,512 3,922,113 3,923,341
Lynwood -2.13 71,399 69,880 69,880
Malibu -0.61 11,608 11,537 11,537
Manhattan Beach -0.67 35,294 35,058 35,058
Maywood -0.60 27,837 27,670 27,670
Monrovia 1.36 37,964 38,479 38,479
Montebello -0.55 63,264 62,914 62,914
Monterey Park -0.70 60,808 60,380 60,380
Norwalk -0.62 105,207 104,554 105,393
Palmdale -0.53 156,910 156,074 156,074
Palos Verdes Estates -0.68 13,377 13,286 13,286
Paramount -0.66 55,566 55,200 55,200
Pasadena 0.17 145,061 145,306 145,306
Pico Rivera -0.59 63,530 63,157 63,157
Pomona -1.74 153,992 151,319 151,319
Rancho Palos Verdes -0.70 41,835 41,541 41,541
Redondo Beach -0.62 66,900 66,484 66,484
Rolling Hills -0.59 1,877 1,866 1,866
Rolling Hills Estates 0.15 8,086 8,098 8,098
Rosemead -0.44 54,471 54,229 54,229
San Dimas -0.65 34,226 34,003 34,003
San Fernando 0.05 24,742 24,754 24,754
San Gabriel -0.46 40,129 39,945 39,945
San Marino -0.36 13,008 12,961 12,961
Santa Clarita 0.21 221,106 221,572 221,572
Santa Fe Springs -0.74 18,219 18,084 18,129
Santa Monica -0.03 92,995 92,968 92,968
Sierra Madre -0.68 10,728 10,655 10,655
Signal Hill -0.67 11,695 11,617 11,617
South El Monte 0.21 21,252 21,296 21,296
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2021 and Total Population, January 1, 2021 County Percent Change
City 2020-2021
South Gate 0.42
South Pasadena -0.72
Temple City -0.32
Torrance -0.65
Vernon -0.67
Walnut -0.60
West Covina -0.58
West Hollywood -0.60
Westlake Village -0.74
Whittier -0.34
Unincorporated -1.14
County Total -0.89
--- Population Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-20
96,147
25,853
36,343
145,783
297
30,015
106,209
36,344
8,241
86,487
1,035,457
10,127,550
1-1-21
96,553
25,668
36,225
144,832
295
29,835
105,593
36,125
8,180
86,196
1,023,632
10,037,774
Total
Population
1-1-2021
96,553
25,668
36,225
144,832
29,835
105,593
36,125
8,180
86,196
1,024,204
10,044,458
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes. 295
Blank Page
“Serving The People” "Sirviendo A La Comunidad"
Staff Report
03/01/2022 Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
Date: March 1, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor/Chair and City Council/Agency Members From: Alfonso Noyola, City Manager/Executive Director
By: Richard Iglesias, City Clerk
Subject: Creation and Appointment of the Public Utilities Ad Hoc Committee
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council is requested to create a Public Utilities Ad Hoc Committee and appoint two council members to serve on the committee.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Ad Hoc Committees are formed to discuss specific topics, provide feedback to the City Manager, and report out to City Council during its regularly scheduled meetings if needed.
Public utility companiesthat provide services to the Cudahy community are Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, Tract 349 Mutual Water Company, Tract 180 Water Company, Golden State Water Company, AT&T Communication, Spectrum, and other entities.
The City Council is recommended to create an Ad Hoc Delegation Committee to review the City’s partnerships with local utility companies. The committee would identify opportunities and issues raised by the community.
CONCLUSION
Public Utilities Ad Hoc Committee will meet on an as-needed basis contingent on the goals and objectives established by the Committee at its discretion.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.
Item Number
16A
“Serving The People” "Sirviendo A La Comunidad"
Staff Report
03/01/2022 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS
None.