Cupertino City Council
December 6, 2022

Table 1-1 General Plan EIR and Project Comparisons
General Plan EIR a Approved Project Modified Project Approved Project and Modified Project Difference
Project Components
Residential 232 units 188 units 206 units +18 units
Commercial 793,270 sf in the
HOC Special Area 22,593 sf 40,91341,589 sf +18,32018,996 sf Hotel 122-rooms in the
HOC Special Area 122 rooms 0 -122 hotel rooms
Vehicular
Parking --
369 residential
121 hotel
190 commercial
(680 total spaces)
367338 residential
0 hotel
270269 commercial
(637608 total spaces)
-231 residential
-1221 hotel
+8079 commercial
(-4372 total spaces)
Density 40 du/ac b 37 du/ac c 40 du/ac d +3 du/ac
Building Height
e
Building A
60 feet,
or 75 feet with
retail development
55 feet (4 stories) 64 feet (5 stories) +10 feet
Building B 55 feet (4 stories) 50 feet (4 stories) -5 feet Building C 58 feet (4 stories) 61 feet (5 stories) +3 feet Population and Employees
Residential
Population f 682 541 591 +50
Commercial
Employees g
1,763 in the
HOC Special Area 51 9192 +4041
Hotel
Employees
13 for the
HOC Special Area 13 0 -13
Total Employees 64 9192 +2728
Notes: sf = square feet; HOC = Heart of the City; du/ac = dwelling units per acre. a. Certified General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR and Addenda, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007.

December 2014, October 2015, August 2019, December 2019, and October 2021. b. Chapter 2, Planning Areas, page PA-22 and PA-23; Chapter 3, Land Use and Community Design Element, page LU-16 and LU-17. c. 188 dwelling units / 5.12 acres = 36.79 du/ac
d. 206 dwelling units / 5.12 acres = 40.23 du/ac. While the project site’s General Plan land use designation permits 35 dwelling units per acre, the Approved Project included a 35 percent density bonus of 49 units for a total of 188 units (139 units permitted on 3.98 acres + 49 units density bonus = 188 units).
e. Building height is rounded and is measured at the tallest architectural point. See Section 3.1.1.3, Density Bonus Elements, for roofline heights. f. Estimates are based on the Association of Bay Area Governments projections that show an average household size of 2.88 and 2.87 persons for Cupertino in 2020 for the Approved Project and 2025 for the Modified Project, respectively. This is the standard approach for population estimates in Cupertino. Note that the 2.94 persons per household rate for year 2040 was applied in the General Plan EIR. g. The General Plan EIR applied a generation rate of 450 square feet of commercial space and the applicant estimated 13 employees for the hotel.

Source: City of Cupertino and PlaceWorks, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
332 of 759
November 2022 Page 2-1
Standard for Preparation of an Addendum
Pursuant to Section 21166, Subsequent or Supplement Impact Report; Conditions, of CEQA and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, of the State CEQA Guidelines, when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for the project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are met:
 Substantial project changes are proposed that will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;  Substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
 New information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified was adopted shows any of the following:
 The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration.
 Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR or negative declaration.
 Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.  Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or negative declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.

Where none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 are present,2 the lead agency must determine whether to prepare an Addendum or whether no further CEQA documentation is required (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[b]). An Addendum is appropriate where some minor technical changes or additions to the previously certified EIR or adopted negative declaration are necessary, but there are no 2 See also Section 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies the requirements of Section 15162 to supplemental EIRs.

CC 12-06-2022
333 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

STANDARD FOR PREPARATION OF AN ADDENDUM

new or substantially more severe significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration).

In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the City has determined that an Addendum to the Adopted MND is the appropriate environmental document for the Modified Project. This Addendum reviews the changes proposed by the Modified Project and examines whether, as a result of any changes or new information, a subsequent EIR may be required. This Addendum documents that none of the conditions described in CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 calling for preparation of a subsequent or supplemental negative declaration have occurred.

CC 12-06-2022
334 of 759
November 2022 Page 3-3
Project Description

REGIONAL SETTING
Cupertino is a suburban city of 10.9 square miles on the southern portion of the San Francisco peninsula in Santa Clara County. The city is approximately 36 miles southeast of downtown San Francisco and 8 miles west of downtown San Jose. The cities of Los Altos and Sunnyvale are adjacent to the northern city boundaries, the cities of Santa Clara and San Jose lie to the east, and Saratoga lies to the south.

Unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County form the western boundary of Cupertino and portions of the southern boundary. The city is accessed by Interstate 280 (I-280), which functions as a major east/west regional connector, and State Route 85, which functions as the main north/south regional connector.

Regional access to the project site is provided by I-280 via North De Anza Boulevard to the north, and by Highway 85 via Stevens Creek Boulevard to the west. See Figure 3-1, Regional and Vicinity Map.

LOCAL SETTING
The project site is located within a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Mixed-Use Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA) and is in close proximity to VTA bus routes along Alves Drive, Stevens Creek Boulevard, and De Anza Boulevard. The project site is bounded by North De Anza Boulevard, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Alves Drive, and Bandley Drive. As shown on Figure 3-2, Aerial View of Project Site and Surroundings, the 5.12-acre project site is bounded by commercial land uses to the north, south, east, and west, recreational, office, and commercial land uses to the southeast, and residential land uses to the northeast and northwest. Sensitive receptors include places with people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution, noise, or environmental contaminants. These sites can include schools, parks and playgrounds, day care centers, hotels, senior housing, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. Sensitive receptors within 0.25 miles (1,320 feet)3 of the project site include:
 Aloft Hotel roughly 0.11 miles (60 feet) to the north across Alves Drive;  Apartments roughly 0.25 miles (130 feet) to the northwest, across Alves Drive and Bandley Drive;  St. Joseph of Cupertino School roughly 0.07 miles (390 feet) to the east;  Cali Mill Plaza Park roughly 0.10 miles (528 feet) to the southeast; and  Happy Days Child Development Center roughly 0.16 miles (850 feet) to the west. 3 This distance is consistent with criterion (c) in Section 4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, which asks “Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances or waste within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school?”
CC 12-06-2022
335 of 759
Figure 3-1
Regional and Vicinity Map
Source: Placeworks, 2016.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO
^_

FREMONT
£¤101
§¨¦680
§¨¦580

PROJECT SITE
ALAMO
NEWARK
DUBLIN

HAYWARD

OAKLAND

ALAMEDA

SARATOGA

CAMPBELL

SAN JOSE

MILPITAS

MILLBRAE

PACIFICA

DANVILLE

SAUSALITO

LOS GATOS

CUPERTINO

LOS ALTOS

PALO ALTO

SAN MATEO

DALY CITY LIVERMORE

SAN RAMON

UNION CITY

PLEASANTON

SANTA CLARA

FOSTER CITY

SAN LORENZO

SAN LEANDRO

REDWOOD CITY

HILLSBOROUGH

HALF MOON BAY

MOUNTAIN VIEW

CASTRO VALLEY

SAN FRANCISCO

EAST FOOTHILLS
SOUTH

SAN FRANCISCO
§¨¦280
§¨¦880 §¨¦680
§¨¦80 §¨¦980
§¨¦280
¬«35
¬«85
¬«84
¬«92
¬«236
¬«1
¬«17
¬«9
¬«237
¬«87
¬«24
¬«185
¬«61
¬«1 ¬«238
¬«35
¬«1
¬«84
0 2.5 5 10
Miles
Source: PlaceWorks, 2022.

Figure 3-1
Regional and Vicinity Map

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PLACEWORKS
CC 12-06-2022
336 of 759
Figure 3-2
Aerial View of the Project Site
Source: Placeworks, 2016.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

BANDLEY DR

ALVES DR

N DE ANZA BLVD

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

S DE ANZA BLVD
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
St. Joseph of Cupertino
Parish/School
Cupertino
City Center
The Crossroads
Target
Aloft
Hotel
Project Site
De Anza College
Apple HQ
Cali Mill
Plaza
Figure 3-2
Aerial View of the Project Site
Source: Placeworks, 2016.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

BANDLEY DR

ALVES DR

N DE ANZA BLVD

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

S DE ANZA BLVD
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
St. Joseph of Cupertino
Parish/School
Cupertino
City Center
The Crossroads
Target
Aloft
Hotel
Project Site
De Anza College
Apple HQ
Cali Mill
Plaza
Source: PlaceWorks, 2022.

Figure 3-2
Aerial View of the Project Site

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PLACEWORKS
CC 12-06-2022
337 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

EXISTING SITE SETTING
Site Character
The project site consists of two parcels, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 326-34-066 (10118 to 10122 Bandley Drive), which is 4.35 acres in size, and APN 326-34-043 (10145 De Anza Boulevard), which is 0.77 acres in size. The project site is currently developed with two single-story commercial buildings and associated surface parking. The Bandley Drive parcel includes the Marina Plaza Shopping Center, a commercial building occupied by various uses, including a specialty grocery store as an anchor and other uses such medical offices, smaller retail tenants, and restaurants, totaling 43,870 square feet in tenant space. The De Anza Boulevard parcel currently includes a free-standing building occupied by a 4,854 square-foot restaurant. The existing Bandley Drive parcel has an area of 189,522 square feet and the existing De Anza Boulevard parcel has an area of 33,522 square feet, for a combined development area of 223,044 square feet (5.12 acres).

According to available historical sources, the subject property was formerly developed with agriculture land and/or residential/farmstead from as early as 1897 through the late-1960s. The De Anza Boulevard parcel was developed with the current building in 1973, while the Bandley Drive parcel was developed with the current building in 1979.
4 According to the Department of Toxic Substance Control, organic pesticides warrant further testing for orchards or other agricultural uses that were active after 1950. 5 Due
to the age of the existing buildings, they may contain asbestos-containing materials or lead-based paint, which were not regulated in construction until the early 1970s.

Because the building on the De Anza Boulevard parcel was developed in 1973, it has the potential to be considered a historic building. However, neither building is currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the list of California Historical resources, 6 nor are the existing buildings associated with
significant cultural events, persons in California’s past. Further, the project site does not have any distinctive historical characteristics, and as such does not have any qualifying historical value. 4 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2022. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 10145 N De Anza Boulevard and 10118-10122 Bandley Drive, Cupertino, California 95014, March 21. 5 California Department of Toxic Substances Control California Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties, page 3, August 7, 2008.
6 California Office of Historic Preservation, 2022. California Historical Resources, http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=43, accessed on June 1, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
338 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-7
Vegetation and Landcover
According to the Vegetation Map shown in the Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of the General Plan, the project site is within the urban forest (i.e., trees in the city).7 The City recognizes that every tree on both public and private property is an important part of Cupertino's urban forest and contributes significant economic, environmental, and aesthetic benefits of the community.8 The Arborist Report prepared by HortScience, Inc., dated September 2021, and revised March 2022, determined that 98 trees are currently located on the project site, including three street trees on North De Anza Boulevard and Alves Drive. Landscaping is made up of mostly trees, consisting of Carob, Camphor, Carrotwood, River red gum, Sweetgum, Tulip poplar, Southern magnolia, Flaxleaf paperbark, Canary Island pine, Chinese Pistache, Carolina cherry laurel, Evergreen pear, African sumac, Coast redwood, and Mexican fan palm. 9 The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) has no record of special-status plant and animal species on the project site or urbanized areas within a roughly 1-mile area surrounding the project site.

There are no natural lands within a roughly 1-mile area of the project site.

The project site is generally flat with a slight eastward slope and has an elevation of around 240 feet above mean sea level.10 The surficial geology consists of late Pleistocene older surficial sediments, which is described as older alluvial terrace gravel, sand, and clay, undeformed.11 No paleontological resources have been identified on the project site; however, the presence of Pleistocene deposits that are known to contain fossils indicates that the overall city, including the project site, could contain paleontological resources.12 Unique geological features are not common in Cupertino. The geologic processes are generally the same as those in other parts of the state, country, and even the world. The geology and soils on the project site are common throughout the city and region and are not considered to be unique.

The existing impervious surface totals 209,783 square feet. Stormwater from the site drains to a network of City-maintained storm drains at the intersection of Alves Drive and North De Anza Boulevard that 7 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 6, Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element, Figure ES-1, Vegetation, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/generalplan/general-plan, accessed June 1, 2022. 8 City of Cupertino, 2022. Tree Protection & Tree Removal. https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/communitydevelopment/planning/residential-development/tree-protection-tree-removal, accessed June 1, 2022. 9 HortScience, Inc., 2022. Arborist Report. Revised March. 10 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2022. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 10145 N De Anza Boulevard and 10118-10122 Bandley Drive, Cupertino, California 95014, March 21. 11 United States Geological Survey and Association of American State Geologists, modified May 2022. Geologic map of the Cupertino and San Jose West quadrangles, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/prodfFidesc_83442.htm, accessed June 1, 2022. 12 City of Cupertino, certified General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR, (December 2014) State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007 (October 2015), and approved Addenda (October 2015, July 2019, August 2019, December 2019, and October 2021).

CC 12-06-2022
339 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

collect runoff from city streets and carry it to the creeks that run through Cupertino to the San Francisco Bay.

LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The project site is located in the Heart of the City Special Area’s Crossroads subarea and more specifically in the North Crossroads Node of this subarea.
13 The Marina Plaza Shopping Center is listed as a Priority Housing Element Site in the current Housing Element. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial/Office/Residential.14 In addition, the General Plan identifies the site as being within a regional priority development area or “PDA.” These designations are described below.

HEART OF THE CITY SPECIAL AREA AND NORTH CROSSROAD NODE The City has designated Special Areas along one of the four major mixed-use corridors in the city, which represent key areas within Cupertino where future development and reinvestment is generally focused.

The Heart of the City Special Area is a key mixed-use, commercial corridor intended to create a greater sense of place, more community identity, and a positive and memorable experience for residents, workers, and visitors of Cupertino.15 The Heart of the City Special Area includes five specific subareas, each with unique characteristics, land uses, and streetscape elements: West Stevens Creek Boulevard, Crossroads, Central Stevens Creek Boulevard, City Center, and East Stevens Creek Boulevard.

The Crossroads subarea is located between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. This area consists of specialty shops, grocery stores, and restaurants. The primary use in this area is commercial/retail, with commercial office above the ground level allowed as a secondary use. Limited residential is also allowed as a supporting use pursuant to the Housing Element.16 The North Crossroads Node encompasses the northern half of the subarea.17
The General Plan policies that guide development in this area are intended to ensure that the Heart of the City Special Area will continue being a focus of commerce, community identity, social gathering, and pride for Cupertino. The area is envisioned as a tree-lined boulevard that forms a major route for automobiles, but also supports walking, biking, and transit that links adjacent neighborhoods. 13 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 2, Planning Areas. 14 City of Cupertino, Land Use Map adopted December 4, 2014, and amended August 20, 2019. 15 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 2, Planning Areas. 16 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 4, Housing. 17 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 3, Land Use, Figure LU-2, Community Form Diagram, pages LU-16 and LU-17.

CC 12-06-2022
340 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-9

PRIORITY HOUSING ELEMENT SITE
The Marina Plaza Shopping Center was identified as Priority Housing Element Site A4 (Marina Plaza) in the General Plan Housing Element. As described in the General Plan, many of the City’s Housing Element sites, including the project site, are located in major corridors to reduce traffic and environmental impacts and preserve neighborhoods.18 As a Priority Housing Element Site, it is allocated 200 units in the Housing Element, with the Marina Plaza Shopping Center site at a maximum density of 35 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The maximum allowable height for development on the project site is 45 feet. 19 Housing Element Strategy HE-2.3.7 (Density Bonus Ordinance) states that for projects that are consistent with the Density Bonus Ordinance (Cupertino Municipal Code [CMC] Chapter 19.56), density bonuses, incentives, or concession that result in identifiable cost reductions needed to make the housing affordable, would apply.20 See Section 3.5.1, Density Bonus Standards, for additional details Density Bonus law, and Section 3.1.1.3 Density Bonus Elements for a description of the proposed project’s Density Bonus application. Commercial/Office/Residential Land Use Designation The Commercial/Office/Residential land use designation allows primarily commercial and office uses, secondarily residential uses, or a compatible combination of the two uses.21 Allowed commercial uses include retail sales, businesses, limited professional offices, and service establishments with direct contact with customers. Retail stores that would be a nuisance for adjoining neighborhoods or harmful to the community identity would be regulated by CMC Chapter 19.60, General Commercial Zones, and the associated commercial zoning ordinance use permit procedures.

PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA
Plan Bay Area is the Bay Area’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) adopted jointly by the Association of Bay Area Government’s (ABAG) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). As part of the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area, local governments, including Cupertino, have identified PDAs to focus growth.22 A PDA is a transit-oriented, infill development opportunity areas within existing communities. In addition to PDAs, Plan Bay Area identifies Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), which are areas within 0.25 miles of a major transit stop (that have 15 minute or less 18 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 3, Land Use and Community Design Element, page LU18. 19 Heart of the City Specific Plan (2014) page 15 (height), and City of Cupertino General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 4, Housing Element, Table HE-5: Summary of Priority Housing Element Sites to Meet the RHNA - Scenario A, page HE-17 (density).
20 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.56, Density Bonus, Sections 19.56.030, Density Bonus, and

19.56.040, Incentives or Concessions, Waivers and Reduction of Parking Standards. 21 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Appendix A: Land Use Definitions, i, page A-6. 22 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 3, Land Use and Community Design Element, page LU7.

CC 12-06-2022
341 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

service level frequency) that is existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program adopted pursuant to Sections 450.216 or 450.322 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

An overarching goal of the regional Plan Bay Area is to concentrate development in areas where there are existing services and infrastructure, rather than locating new growth in outlying areas where substantial transportation investments would be necessary, to maximize energy conservation and achieve the per capita passenger vehicle, vehicle miles traveled (also referred to as “VMT”), and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions.

The project site is located in a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City Cores, Corridors & Station Areas PDA. Because the proposed project is in close proximity to existing employment centers, roadways, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian routes, it is also a designated TPA.

The project site is within the Planned Development with General Commercial (P(CG, RES)) zoning district.23 As described in CMC Section 19.80.010, Purpose, the Planned Development zoning district is intended to provide a means of guiding land development or redevelopment of the city that is uniquely suited for planned coordination of land uses. Development in this zoning district provides for a greater flexibility of land use intensity and design because of accessibility, ownership patterns, topographical considerations, and community design objectives.24 CMC Chapter 19.80, Planned Development, also allows a project proponent to propose development standards for their specific project.

All Planned Development districts are identified on the zoning map with the letter coding "P" followed by a specific reference to the general type of use allowed in the particular planning development zoning district. The type of use allowed on the project site is General Commercial with Residential uses (CG, Res), consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site, and is within a district in which uses are intended to be a mix of general commercial and residential.25 General Commercial allows uses such as retail food, drug, apparel, or hardware stores, full-service restaurants, professional and commercial office services, laundry facilities, non-auto related repair services, and personal services, along with several other specialty uses.26
23 City of Cupertino, updated May 2015. Zoning Map & Ordinance, https://www.cupertino.org/ourcity/departments/community-development/planning/zoning, accessed June 1, 2022. 24 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.80, Planned Development, Section 19.80.010, Purpose. 25 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.80, Planned Development, Section 19.80.030, Establishment of Districts- Permitted and Conditional Uses. 26 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.60, General Commercial, Section 19.60.030, Permitted, Conditional and Excluded Uses in General Commercial Zoning Districts.

CC 12-06-2022
342 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-11

CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.56, Density Bonus, is intended to comply with the State Density Bonus Law, Government Code Section 65915,
27 which provides that a local agency shall adopt an ordinance specifying how the agency will comply with that section. CMC Section 19.56.020, Eligibility for Density Bonus, states that housing developments resulting in a net increase of at least five units (excluding density bonus units) are eligible for a density bonus when the applicant proposes at least one of the listed requirements and the requirements of CMC Section 19.56.020(C), if applicable. One of the criteria for eligibility for a density bonus is construction of affordable housing (CMC Section 19.56.020(A)(1)(a) and (b)). Section 19.56.040, Incentives or Concessions, Waivers and Reduction of Parking Standards, states that changes to development standards or zoning code requirements may be allowed under certain conditions.28 The granting of a density bonus, incentive or concession, in and of itself, shall not require a general plan amendment, zone change, or other discretionary approval and shall be reviewed concurrently with the review of the housing development.29
Pursuant to CMC Chapter 19.80, Planned Development, the Planned Development Zoning District allows a project proponent to propose zoning setbacks different from those required in the underlying Zoning District to allow flexibility in the project, as long as these are approved by the City Council. In any case, the setbacks in the Zoning District or the setbacks proposed by the project, the project site must adhere to the General Plan requirement of maintaining sufficient space for adequate light, requirement for air and visibility at intersections, and the requirement for general conformity to yard requirements of adjacent or nearby zones, lot or parcels.

CMC Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance, implements the California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 by establishing new water-efficient landscaping and irrigation requirements. Any building or landscape project that involves more than 2,500 square feet of landscape area is required to submit a Landscape Project Submittal to the Director of Community Development for approval. Existing and 27 Government Code, Title 7, Planning and Land Use, Division 1, Planning and Zoning Sections, Chapter 4.3, Density Bonuses and Other Incentives, Section 65915. 28 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.56 Density Bonus, Sections 19.56.030, Density Bonus, and

19.56.040, Incentives or Concessions, Waivers and Reduction of Parking Standards. 29 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.56 Density Bonus, Section 19.56.020, Eligibility for Density Bonus.

CC 12-06-2022
343 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

established landscaped areas greater than 1 acre in size are required to submit water budget calculations and audits of established landscapes.30
CMC Chapter 14.12, Trees, establishes regulations for the planting, care, and maintenance of public trees, and provides for the continuous maintenance of the public trees, with the goal of encouraging tree preservation. The City funds the planting and maintenance of public trees through payment of reimbursement costs as a condition of building permit issuance.31 CMC Chapter 14.18, Protected Tree Ordinance, provides regulations for the protection, preservation, and maintenance of trees of certain species and sizes. Removal of a protected tree requires a permit from the City. “Protected” trees include trees of a certain species and size on private property in all zoning districts; heritage trees whether on private or public property in all zoning districts; any tree required to be planted or retained as part of an approved development application, building permit, tree removal permit, or code enforcement action in all zoning districts; and approved privacy protection planting in single-family residential zoning districts. Since the existing development is on property that requires a development application, all existing trees on the site are considered protected.32 The City of Cupertino Bird Safe Design Ordinance in CMC Chapter 19.102, Glass and Lighting Standards, contains specific building and site design measures to reduce bird mortality from windows or other specific glass features known to increase the risk of bird collisions, and to reduce light pollution known to contribute to bird mortality and reduced visibility of the night sky, and cause adverse impacts to human health. These guidelines are applicable to any project that is required to obtain a building permit or a permit pursuant to CMC Title 19, Zoning, including the proposed project. CMC Section 19.102.030, Birdsafe Development Requirements, includes:33  Glass requirements for new or replacement windows of twelve square feet or more and facades requiring no more than 10 percent of the surface area of the façade be untreated glass between the ground and 60 feet above ground. Treatments can include opaque glass, window muntins, exterior insect screens, exterior netting, or special glass treatments such as fritting to provide visual cues and reduce the likelihood of bird collisions. 30 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance. 31 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.12, Trees. 32 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.18, Protected Trees. 33 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.102, Glass and Lighting Standards.

CC 12-06-2022
344 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-13
 Indoor lighting requirements to program automatic sensors and timer to turn off at 11:00 p.m., within two hours after business closes, or the addition of filtering with the use of interior or exterior blinds.
 Design requirements to avoid funneling of flight paths along buildings or trees to building facades; avoid use of highly reflective glass or highly transparent glass; and avoid glass skyways or walkways, freestanding glass walls, transparent building corners, or other design elements where trees, landscaping, water features, or the sky is visible form the exterior.

CMC Section 19.102.040, Outdoor Lighting Requirements, includes requirements to reduce light pollution throughout the city. These requirements prohibit outdoor lighting that blinks, flashes, or rotates; outdoor lighting that projects above the horizontal plan; lighting that unnecessarily illuminates other lots or interferes with the enjoyment of that lot; high-intensity discharge lighting for recreation courts or private property; and spotlights. Outdoor lighting that is not prohibited, must abide by the following:34  All outdoor light much be fully shielded fixtures directed downward to meet the particular need and away from adjacent properties.
 Illumination levels cannot exceed one foot-candle onto an adjacent property and maximum light intensity cannot exceed a maintained value of ten foot-candles when measured at finished grade.  All light sources must have a maintained correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvin or less.  All outdoor lighting must be turned off by 11:00 p.m. or when people are no longer present in exterior areas, except for security lighting required and designed according to the California Building Code.
 Automated control systems should be used to meet lighting requirements.  Lighting design must compliment building and landscaping, and fixtures must be appropriate in height, intensity, and scale to the use.

CMC Section 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, identifies environmental protection standards that all construction projects must meet, including but not limited to environmental mitigation measures identified in any environmental documents required as part of a General Plan update. These requirements apply to every project within the city and are demonstrated through the submittal of construction management or permit plans prior to issuance of permits. Development projects must submit technical reports for air quality, hazardous materials, vehicle miles traveled, and construction 34 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.102, Glass and Lighting Standards.

CC 12-06-2022
345 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

vibrations. This section also includes nine distinct permit submittal requirements for each topic area, including the following:

1. Air Quality

2. Hazardous Materials

3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy

4. Biologic Resources

5. Cultural Resources

6. Hydrology and Water Quality

7. Noise and Vibration

8. Paleontological Resources

9. Utilities and Service Systems

ENERGY CONSERVATION
The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24, known as “CALGreen”) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) to apply to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of every newly constructed building or structure, unless otherwise indicated in the California Building Standards Code, throughout the State of California.35 CALGreen established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation requiring new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. The local building permit process enforces the building efficiency standards. CMC Chapter

16.58, Green Building Standards Code, adopts the CALGreen requirements and makes it part of the CMC along with local amendments for projects in the city. The City’s Green Building Ordinance contains mandatory, minimum required green building techniques, including measures affecting water use efficiency and water conservation.

CMC Sections 16.58.100 through 16.58.220 set forth the standards for green building requirements by type of building. As shown on Table 101.10 in CMC Section 16.58.220, mixed-use projects with residential and non-residential components shall comply by either: (1) meeting the applicable requirements for each use; or (2) meeting the applicable requirements for the use that comprises the majority of the project’s square footage where uses are attached and/or combined in a building. For the residential component, new construction greater than nine homes is required to be Green Points Rated certified at minimum 50 points, Silver in Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), or Alternate Reference Standard per 35 California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, January 1, 2020, California Green Buildings Standards Code, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBSC2019/copyright.

CC 12-06-2022
346 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-15
CMC Section 101.10.2.36 For the non-residential component, development from 25,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet is required to be LEED Certified or Alternate Reference Standard pursuant to CMC Section 101.10.2. CMC Section 16.58.230 permits applicants to apply an alternate green building standard for a project in lieu of the minimum standards outlined in CMC Section 16.58.220 that meet the same intent of conserving resources and reducing solid waste.

The California Energy Code (Part 6, Title 24) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24) to reduce wasteful and unnecessary energy consumption in newly constructed and existing buildings. The City of Cupertino has adopted the California Energy Code, with local amendments into, as CMC Chapter 16.54, Energy Code. CMC Section 16.54.100(2), Scope for Newly Construction Building, requires all newly constructed buildings to be All-Electric Buildings. All-Electric Buildings are defined as a building that has no natural gas or propane plumbing installed within the building, and that uses electricity as the sole source of energy for its space and water heating.37 The City approved reach codes in February 2020,
38 which go above California Energy Code requirements to reduce energy, water, and associated GHG emissions. The City includes five exemptions to CMC Section 16.54.100(2) in CMC Section

16.54.100(2)(A) that would permit using natural gas under limited circumstances approved by the City. A summary of exemptions includes nonresidential occupancies (i.e., factory, high-hazard, and laboratories), or other similar research and development uses; essential facilities; nonresidential buildings containing a for-profit restaurant open to the public or an employee kitchen; projects that demonstrate that all-electric buildings are not attainable; and accessory dwelling units.

SOLID WASTE REDUCTION
Consistent with CALGreen, CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Division of Construction and Demolition Waste, requires that a minimum of 65 percent of all non-hazardous construction and demolition debris must be recycled or salvaged, and that all applicants have a waste management plan for on-site sorting of construction debris. Additionally, in December 2017, the City adopted a Zero Waste Policy.39 According to the Zero Waste Policy, the City will require, through the City’s waste hauling franchise agreement, 36 Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) is a green building certification program that recognizes best-in-class building strategies and practices that reduce consumption energy, and water, and reduce solid waste directly diverted to landfills. LEED certified buildings are ranked in order of efficiency from Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum being the highest ranking with the greatest efficiency standard. LEED Silver certified buildings typically reduce is the third highest ranking out of the four, with just being certified being the lowest and Gold and Platinum being the second highest. 37 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Section 16.54.110, Definitions and Rules of Construction. 38 Cities may adopt more stringent building codes for energy use than those required by the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) , which are known as “reach codes.” 39 City of Cupertino. 2017. Zero Waste Policy.
https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/19101/636505857999300000. Accessed July 26, 2021.

CC 12-06-2022
347 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

steadfast and ongoing efforts by the City’s franchisee to maintain a minimum residential and commercial waste diversion rate of 75 percent with a goal of reaching and maintaining 80 percent by 2025.

WATER QUALITY
CMC Chapter 9.18, Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, provides regulations and gives legal effect to the Municipal Regional Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (MRP) issued to the City. This chapter also ensures ongoing compliance with the most recent version of the City’s MRP regarding municipal storm water and urban runoff requirements. This chapter applies to all water entering the storm drain system generated on any private, public, developed, and undeveloped lands within the city. The CMC contains permit requirements for construction projects and new development or redevelopment projects to minimize the discharge of storm water runoff.

PROJECT COMPONENTS
As described in Chapter 1, Introduction and Purpose, since the time of the Approved Project and the Adopted MND, the Approved Project has been “modified.” Table 3-1, Comparison of Approved and Modified Projects, compares the project components of the Approved and Modified Projects.

Table 3-1 Comparison of the Approved Project and Modified Project Approved Project Modified Project
Building A
Use Hotel Retail/Residential
Stories (Height) a 4 stories (55 feet) +
two levels underground parking
5 stories (64 feet) +
one level underground parking
Residential or Hotel Units 122 (Hotel) 56 (Residential) Building B
Use Retail/Residential Retail/Residential
Stories (Height) a 4 stories (55 feet) +
two levels underground parking
4 stories (50 feet) +
one level underground parking
Residential Units 108 86
Building C
Use Retail/Residential Retail/Residential
Stories (Height) a 4 stories (58 feet) +
one level underground parking
5 stories (61 feet) +
one level underground parking
Residential Units 80 64
Population 541 b 591 c
Employees 64 d 9192 e
Notes:
a. Building height is rounded and is measured at the tallest architectural point. See Section 3.1.1.3, Density Bonus Elements, for roofline heights. b. 2.88 persons per household x 188 units = 541.44
c. 2.87 persons per household x 206 units = 591.22 residents d. 22,593 square feet of commercial land use / 450 square feet per employee = 50.21 employees) + 13 hotel employees) = 63.21 total employees. e. 41,268 41,589 square feet of commercial land use / 450 square feet per employee = 91.71 92.42 employees Sources: City of Cupertino and PlaceWorks, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
348 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-17
The Approved Project and the proposed Modified Project would involve demolishing the two existing commercial buildings totaling approximately 49,140 square feet and redeveloping the project site. Under the Approved Project, Building A would include the hotel with meeting rooms and a fitness area, lounge, café and bar, restaurant, and swimming pool amenities.

Commercial development would be located at the ground level of both Buildings B and C and residential development would be located in the stories above. Building B and Building C would contain apartments.

Buildings B and C would be oriented around a central courtyard. Amenities for Building B would include a community room, exercise room, bike lounge, and swimming pool. Amenities for Building C would include a community room.

The Approved Project would have residential common open space in the form of rooftop gardens, balconies, and an open courtyard. Each building would have two levels of underground parking. Under the proposed Modified Project, the project applicant proposes to redevelop the project site with three mixeduse buildings, consisting of commercial uses at ground floor and residential units on the floors above. The second level of each building would have a center courtyard with greenery, searing, and gathering areas, fireplaces, and general recreational areas. Buildings A and C would offer a roof deck garden with seating and open space.

The mechanical equipment and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) unit would be located on the roof of each building. Each building would have one levels of underground parking. The following describes the proposed Modified Project as a whole rather than compared to the Approved Project. The conceptual site plan for the proposed Modified Project is shown on Figure 3-3, Conceptual Site Plan.

RESIDENTIAL
The proposed Modified Project’s mixed-use buildings include 206 apartment units. Apartments would be comprised of a mix of one- to three-bedroom units, some with a den, with an overall size average of approximately 1,350 square feet. Table 3-2, Residential Unit Types per Building, lists the number of each unit type in each building. The residential areas total approximately 268,436268,723 square feet.

CC 12-06-2022
349 of 759
Source: Tectonic Builders Corporation, 2022. Figure 3-3 Conceptual Site Plan

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PLACEWORKS
0 Scale (Feet)
120
CC 12-06-2022
350 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-19
Table 3-2 Residential Unit Types per Building
Building A
1 Bedroom 0 0 0 0 0
2 Bedroom 4 4 4 4 16
2 Bedroom + Den 2 2 2 2 8
3 Bedroom 7 7 7 7 28
3 Bedroom + Den 1 1 1 1 4
Sum 14 14 14 14 56
Building B
1 Bedroom 4 3 2 - 9
2 Bedroom 11 12 12 - 35
2 Bedroom + Den 3 3 3 - 9
3 Bedroom 6 6 6 - 18
3 Bedroom + Den 5 5 5 - 15
Sum 29 29 28 - 86
Building C
1 Bedroom 0 0 0 0 0
2 Bedroom 8 8 8 8 32
2 Bedroom + Den 1 1 1 1 4
3 Bedroom 6 6 6 6 24
3 Bedroom + Den 1 1 1 1 4
Sum 16 16 16 16 64
Source: City of Cupertino and PlaceWorks, 2022.

Trash would be collected in three streams: waste, recycling, and compost. Residential trash enclosures would be in the basement level parking garage on the southwest corner of Buildings A and B and in the center of Building C. Residential bins and carts would be moved by staff to and from the central trash staging enclosure, located on the ground floor near Building A. The enclosure would be accessed by the waste management company on trash day from the internal roadway network.

The Modified Project would provide 338 parking spaces for residents in the parking garage, with 208spaces designated for electric vehicles (EV). Vehicular parking would meet the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Modified Project would provide 116 Class 1 and 30 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces for the residential uses.40
40 Class 1 facilities protect the entire bicycle from theft, vandalism, and inclement weather and are appropriate for long-term storage. Class 2 facilities include bicycle racks to which the frame and at least one wheel can be secured with a user-provided lock.

CC 12-06-2022
351 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

COMMERCIAL
The proposed Modified Project would include a total of 41,26841,589 square-foot of commercial space.

Commercial development would be located at the ground level of all three buildings.

Retail trash enclosures would be located on the ground floor on the southeast corner of Building A and on the southwest corner of Buildings B and C. Retail bins and carts would be moved by staff to and from the central trash staging enclosure, located on the ground floor near Building A. The enclosure would be accessed by the waste management company on trash day from the internal roadway network.

The Modified Project would provide 269 retail parking stalls made up of 188 surface parking spots and 81 underground garage parking stalls. Retail parking would include 54 EV stalls. Vehicular parking would meet the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Modified Project would provide 48 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces for the retail uses.

DENSITY BONUS ELEMENTS
In accordance with CMC Section 19.56.040, Incentives or Concessions, Waivers and Reduction of Parking Standards, the proposed Modified Project would include 206 residential units, with a base density of 179 units. Of the total 206 units, the proposed Modified Project will provide 36 Below Market Rate (BMR) units, or 20 percent of base density, rounded up to the nearest whole number. Of these 36 BMR units, 18 BMR-units would be available to moderate-income households at a moderate-income sales price, and 18- BMR units will be available to median-income households at a median-income sales price.

Providing 20 percent of base units as Moderate Units in a for-sale development entitles the project to a 15 percent density bonus, pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(f)(4). Fifteen percent of the base density of 179 units is 26.85 units. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(f)(5), this number should round up to 27 bonus units, to yield a total of 206 units41 for the proposed Modified Project.

The proposed project would also apply a density bonus waiver to reduce the side setbacks required for the proposed buildings, and to allow for a greater building height. If the side setback requirements were enforced, the proposed Modified Project would potentially lose a combined total of approximately eight units per floor in Buildings A and C, for an overall total of at least 30 units as designed. If the height limits were imposed, the proposed Modified Project would potentially lose 30 units as designed, which includes the entire fourth floors of Buildings A and C. The proposed building heights would be as follows:
 Building A. 58 feet and 8 inches at the roofline, and 64 feet and 8 inches at the stair tower  Building B. 43 feet and 9 inches at the roofline and 49 feet and 9 inches at the stair tower  Building C. 55 feet roofline and 61 feet at the stair tower 41 179 base density units + 27 density bonus units = 206 total units proposed.

CC 12-06-2022
352 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-21
Based on an average household size of 2.87 persons,42 the proposed Modified Project would generate 591 residents.
43 Applying the generation rate of one job for every 450 square feet of commercial uses, the proposed Modified Project would generate 9192 employees.44 It is anticipated that future residents and employees would be drawn largely from Cupertino and other communities in the San Francisco Bay Area.

VEHICULAR ACCESS
As shown on Figure 3-3, the proposed Modified Project would have two-lane entrance/exit circulation pattern with access points at Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard. The proposed Modified Projects provides access via five driveways in total: three on Alves Drive, one on Bandley Drive, and one on Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Alves Drive and Bandley Drive driveways would provide full access while the Stevens Creek Boulevard driveway would be right-turn only inbound and outbound. An internal “Main Paseo” would be created to connect Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard between all three buildings. The proposed emergency access route would be the same as the proposed vehicle access routes. Waste management vehicles would follow the same vehicle route as well.

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCESS
Pedestrian access to the building would be available from one access point along Stevens Creek Boulevard; one access point at the intersection of North De Anza Boulevard and Alves Drive; six access points along Alves Drive; one access point at the intersection of Alves Drive and Bandley Drive; and one access point along Bandley Drive. The proposed Modified Project also proposes a plaza, which provides interior pedestrian circulation throughout the site and between the three buildings. While the proposed Modified Project does not propose any new bicycle lanes or routes, the site is accessible via the existing Class II Bike Lane on North De Anza Boulevard, the Enhanced Bike Lane on Stevens Creek Boulevard, and Class III Bike Route along Bandley Drive.45
42 This analysis is based on the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) 2040 projections of the average household size of

2.87 persons for Cupertino in 2025. This is the standard approach for population and housing analysis in Cupertino. 43 206 units times 2.87 persons per household equals 591.22 residents. 4426 841,589 square feet of commercial land use divided by 450 square feet per employee equals 91.7192.42 employees. 45 City of Cupertino, June 2016. 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/3479/636443578340030000, accessed June 1, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
353 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Figure 3-4, Proposed Landscape Plan, illustrates the proposed landscaping plan at ground level. A total of 168 trees, including street trees, would be planted throughout the site. The tree types proposed on site include the Japanese maple, eastern redbud, maidenhair tree, fastigiate beech, coast live oak, crape myrtle, Chinese pistache, and London plane. On Alves Drive, the silver linden would be provided to match the tree type across the street. On North De Anza Boulevard, an oak tree type (quercus engelmannii, quercus gravesii, or quercus cambyi) would be provided and on Bandley Avenue, the Brisbane box. The proposed Modified Project’s landscape planting plan also includes planting of shrubs, bamboo, stormwater landscape, and other groundcover. Landscaping on the second and third floor, as well as the rooftop would also be provided in the form of potted vegetation.

The source, intensity, and type of exterior lighting for the project site would generally be provided for the purpose of orienting site users and for safety needs. In accordance with CMC Section 19.102, Glass and Lighting Standards, all permanent on-site lighting would be low-level illumination, downward directed, and shielded to reduce light spill or glare into surrounding residential homes. There would be no uplighting on the mixed-use building exterior. Except where used for safety, all outside lighting would be turned off by 11:00 p.m. All exterior surface and above-ground mounted fixtures would be complementary to the architectural theme. High efficiency lighting would be located throughout the buildings in accordance with Title 24. The proposed project would not include reflective glass. Where glass features such as windows and doors are proposed, glazing treatments would vary; however, the exterior glass would be designed to reduce reflection and glare in accordance with CMC Section 19.102 as described above in Section 3.1.5, Cupertino Municipal Code Requirements.

The HVAC system would be located on the rooftop for each mixed-use building. The rooftop HVAC system would be shielded from view by a mechanical screening facing all sides of the building, which would also serve as a noise attenuation feature.

The proposed utility infrastructure would connect to the existing water, sewer, storm drain system, electricity network in the area, and would be served by an existing solid waste landfill.

CC 12-06-2022
354 of 759
Source: Jett Landscape Architecture + Design, 2022. Tectonic Builders Corporation, 2022. Figure 3-4 Proposed Landscape Plan

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PLACEWORKS
0 Scale (Feet)
120
CC 12-06-2022
355 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION
As shown in Figure 3-5, Utility Plan, a 3-inch and 6-inch domestic water line and one 8-inch fire service water line would connect to the existing water line in Alves Drive. All landscape zones would be irrigated as required by the Cupertino Landscape Ordinance, and water uses would be tailored to meet CALGreen Building Standards, which as described above in Section 3.5.8.1, Energy Conservation, requires water conservation and requires new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent. Water would be provided by Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). Any new connections or replaced water lines would not encroach on undisturbed areas.

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
As shown on Figure 3-5, Utility Plan, the proposed project would connect to the existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line on Bandley Drive. Sanitary sewer service would be provided by Cupertino Sanitary District.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
The proposed Modified Project would result in 166,445 square feet of impervious surfaces coverage and 56,410 square feet of pervious surfaces coverage. The existing site includes 209,783 square feet of existing impervious surfaces; therefore, the proposed project would reduce impervious surfaces by 43,338 square feet. The proposed Modified Project would replace more than 50 percent of the existing imperious area and therefore is required to provide stormwater treatment for the entire site. The proposed Modified Project would do so through pervious pavements, flow-through planters, and green roof. The proposed Modified Project is required to comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 requirements, which include minimization of impervious surfaces, measures to detain or infiltrate runoff from peak flows to match pre-development conditions, and agreements to ensure that the stormwater treatment and flow control facilities are maintained in perpetuity. The project also must comply with CMC Chapter 9.18 described above in Section 3.5.8.3, Water Quality, which is intended to provide regulations and give legal effect to certain requirements of the NPDES permit issued to the City.

SOLID WASTE SERVICES
Recology would provide curbside recycling, garbage, and compost and landscaping waste service to the project.46 All non-hazardous solid waste collected under the Recology franchise agreement is taken to Newby Island Sanitary Landfill for processing. Under the agreement between the City and Recology, Recology also handles recyclable materials.
46 Recology, 2020. Recology Courtesy Notice, https://www.cupertino.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=28669, accessed June 2, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
356 of 759
Source: Ver Consultants, 2022.

Figure 3-5
Utility Plan

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PLACEWORKS
0 Scale (Feet)
80 CC 12-06-2022
357 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

OTHER UTILITIES (ELECTRIC AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS)
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) would supply electricity infrastructure to the project site.47 The source of electricity would be provided through a partnership of Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), which provides a standard electricity offering from a 50 percent renewable portfolio,48 and PG&E. SVCE also offers a 100 percent renewable option that electricity customers can opt into.

Telephone service would be provided by AT&T and other providers. Cable television service would be available from a number of providers, including Comcast.

The proposed Modified Project would include several features that reduce GHG emissions and help the City meet sustainability goals. These include the following:
 Green Building. The proposed residential development would achieve at a minimum GreenPoint Rated or LEED Silver green building designation, and the proposed commercial development would achieve at a minimum LEED Certified, consistent with the City’s requirements.49, 50  Photovoltaic Solar. The rooftops of the mixed-used buildings of proposed project would include a photovoltaic solar arrays. Each building rooftop would have a photovoltaic system that is tied into the house meter, lowering overall energy costs for the residents and reducing GHG emissions.  Landscaping and Tree Cover. The proposed project would increase landscaping on-site and increase the number of trees. This would increase tree canopy cover on-site and provide shade cover for both buildings and hardscaped areas, reducing energy needed to cool the buildings.  Landscaping Water Use. All landscape zones would be irrigated with sub-surface drip irrigation and tree bubblers to maximize irrigation efficiency and comply with the Cupertino Landscape Ordinance, and water uses would be tailored to meet CALGreen Building Standards, which as described above, requires water conservation and new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent. Irrigation controls would use smart weather sensing technology to minimize irrigation water use.
 Stormwater. Pervious pavements, flow-through planters, and green roof would provide stormwater treatment and reduce the amount of stormwater released into the City’s off-site 47 City of Cupertino, 2022. Other Service Providers, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/other-service-providers, accessed June 2, 2022.
48 Silicon Valley Clean Energy, 2022. It’s All About Choice, https://www.svcleanenergy.org/choices/, accessed June 2, 2022. 49 Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design is a green building program that recognizes building strategies that reduce consumption energy, and water, and reduce solid waste directly diverted to landfills. Silver is the third highest ranking, with Certified being the lowest, Gold the second highest, and Platinum the highest rating. 50 City of Cupertino. 2020. Staff Report, June 25, 2020. https://www.cupertino.org/home/showpublisheddocument/27933/637286788947170000. Accessed July 25, 2021.

CC 12-06-2022
358 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
November 2022 Page 3-27
storm drain infrastructure to ensure no expansion of existing stormwater facilities or the construction of new facilities, the construction of which could otherwise have significant impacts would occur from development of the proposed project.
 Bicycle Parking. The proposed project would include both Class 1 lockers and Class 2 bike parking facilities. The project would include 30 Class 1 and 116 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces for residences and 48 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces.
 Electric Vehicle or EV Charging Stations. The proposed project would include the installation of EV charging stations. The proposed project would meet the number of EV charging stations required under the CMC Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code, requirements as shown in Table 3- 3, Electric Vehicle Parking.

TABLE 3-3 ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES

Required Pursuant to Cupertino
Municipal Code Standards a
Total
Provided
Multi-family b
EV Ready Circuit Level 1 161 161
EV Ready Circuit Level 2 47 47
Total 208
Commercial space
EV Capable 23 23
EV Ready Circuit Level 1 14 14
EVCS Level 2 17 17
Total 54
Grand Total of EV Parking Spaces 262
Notes: EV = electric vehicle; EVCS = electric vehicle charging station a. Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 16.58. Green Building Standards Code. b. Include parking standards for market-rate and below-market-rate housing.

Source: City of Cupertino, PlaceWorks, 2022.

Demolition and construction would be subject to regulatory approval.51 The project applicant proposes to demolish the existing buildings and remove most of the existing on-site vegetation, except for select trees that would remain. The proposed project would be constructed over an approximately 3-year (38-month) period. Demolition and construction work would be conducted between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, as provided for in CMC Section 10.48.053, Grading, Construction and Demolition. Demolition and construction is not permitted on weekends or holidays for sites within 750 feet of other residential 51 New buildings would be constructed to the California 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (effective January 1, 2023).

CC 12-06-2022
359 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUP ERTINO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

properties.52 Demolition debris, including soil, would be off-hauled for disposal in accordance with the City of Cupertino’s Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste Ordinance.53 Typical equipment to be used for demolition and site preparation would include excavators, a skid steer loader, a grader, a rubber-tired dozer, scrapers, and an off-highway truck.

No pile driving, rock blasting, or crushing would occur during the construction phase. Typical equipment to be used during construction of the project would include a backhoe, a crane, aerial lifts, a generator, a diesel pump, dumpers, rollers, and a paver.

During demolition and construction, vehicles, equipment, and materials would be staged and stored on a centrally located portion of the project site when practical. No long-term staging of equipment would occur around the perimeter of the site where adjacent to existing residential uses. No staging would occur in the public right-of-way. The construction site and staging areas would be clearly marked, and construction fencing would be installed to prevent disturbance and safety hazards. A combination of onand off-site parking facilities for construction workers would be identified during demolition, grading, and construction.

REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Following approval of this Addendum, the following discretionary permits and approvals from the City would be required for the proposed Modified Project:
 Development Permit
 Architectural and Site Approval Permit
 Tree Removal Permit
 Tentative Map/Final Map
In addition, permits for demolition, grading and building, and the certificate of occupancy would be required from the City. Encroachment permits from the City would also be required for any work performed in the public right-of-way. As part of the Development Permit, the proposed Modified Project is requesting a Density Bonus of 27 units pursuant to State Law as incorporated into the City’s Housing Element54 and CMC.55 Pursuant to Density Bonus law, the applicant is also requesting waivers of development standards for height and setbacks, that the developer states would have the effect of physically precluding the development of the proposed Modified Project at the density proposed. 52 Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 10, Public Peace, Safety and Morals, Chapter 10.48, Community Noise Control, Section

10.48.053, Grading, Construction and Demolition. 53 Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste.
54 City of Cupertino, amended March 2020. General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 4, Housing, Strategy HE-2.3.7:

Density Bonus Ordinance. 55 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.56, Density Bonus, Sections 19.56.030, Density Bonus, and

19.56.040, Incentives or Concessions, Waivers and Reduction of Parking Standards.

CC 12-06-2022
360 of 759
November 2022 Page 4-1
Environmental Analysis
As previously described in Chapter 2, Standard for Preparation of an Addendum, this Addendum has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164 to determine whether implementation of the proposed Modified Project would result in any new impacts or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts than were previously analyzed in the Adopted MND. Accordingly, this Addendum only considers the extent to which the proposed changes could result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts; it does not reevaluate impacts that would remain consistent with the analysis in the Adopted MND. The environmental topic areas analyzed in the Adopted MND includes:56  Aesthetics
 Air Quality
 Biological Resources
 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
 Energy
 Geology and Soils
 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
 Hydrology and Water Quality
 Land Use and Planning
 Noise
 Population and Housing
 Public Services
 Parks and Recreation
 Transportation
 Utilities and Service Systems
 Wildfire

AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 21099 (transit priority
area/major transit stop), would the
proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista? LTS Yes No No No
56 Note that Wildfire and Energy as standalone topics are requirements of CEQA updates that took place in December 2018.

These topics were addressed in the Adopted MND in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section and the Utilities and Service Systems section, respectively.

CC 12-06-2022
361 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Except as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 21099 (transit priority
area/major transit stop), would the
proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic
highway?
LTS Yes No No No
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character
or quality of the site and its
surroundings, or in an urbanized area,
conflict with applicable zoning and
other regulations governing scenic
quality?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section I, Aesthetics, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts to visual resources associated with the Approved Project. The impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Senate Bill (SB) 743 became effective on January 1, 2014, and, among other provisions, SB 743 amended CEQA by adding Public Resources Code Section 21099 regarding analysis of aesthetics, parking, and traffic impacts for urban infill projects. CEQA Section 21099(d)(1) states: “Aesthetic and parking impacts of a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project on an infill site located within a transit priority area (TPA) shall not be considered significant impacts on the environment.” Accordingly, aesthetics and parking are no longer to be considered in determining if a project has the potential to result in significant environmental effects for projects that meet all of the following three criteria: 1) The project is in a TPA; 2) The project is on an infill site; and 3) The project is residential, mixed-use residential, or an employment center.

CC 12-06-2022
362 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-3
As described below, the proposed project is exempt from an aesthetics evaluation because it is located on a site that meets the definition of an infill site and a TPA, and is a qualified mixed-use residential project pursuant to CEQA Section 21099:
 Transit Priority Area: A TPA is defined as an area within 0.25 miles (1,320 feet) of a major transit stop or major transit corridor that exists or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program or applicable regional transportation plan. The project is located and connected to Stevens Creek Boulevard, which is considered a high-quality transit corridor (VTA 23 bus operates). The center of the project site is located approximately 500 feet from Stevens Creek Boulevard along a pedestrian pathway. The northern most edge of the project site is approximately 750 feet from Stevens Creek Boulevard. In addition, the westbound transit stop (on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard) is approximately 1,150 feet from the center of the project site and the eastbound stop is 1,020 feet.
 Infill Site: An infill site is defined as “a lot located within an urban area that has been previously developed or on a vacant site where at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins or is separated only by an improved public right-of-way from, parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses.” The project site is currently developed with two single-story commercial buildings and associated surface parking. The project site is bounded by North De Anza Boulevard, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Alves Drive, and Bandley Drive. Surrounding land uses include commercial land uses to the north, south, east, and west, recreational, office, and commercial land uses to the southeast, and residential land uses to the northeast and northwest.  Mixed-Use Residential: The proposed project is a mixed-use project that primarily includes residential uses. The proposed project includes 41,589 square feet of commercial space and 268,723 sf of total residential space.
 Employment Center: An employment center is defined as “a project located on property zoned for commercial uses with a floor area ratio (FAR)57 of no less than 0.75 and that is located within a transit priority area.” The project site is within the Planned Development with General Commercial (P(CG, RES)) zoning district. The proposed project would have a FAR of 1.2. 58 While the proposed Modified Project would increase the heights for each of the three proposed buildings, both projects meet the standard for CEQA Section 21099 and therefore, aesthetic impacts shall not be 57 A common measure of building intensity is Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is determined by dividing the amount of gross floor space in a building by the total area of the parcel it occupies. For example, a 10,000 square‐foot building on a 20,000 square‐foot parcel has a FAR of 0.5 or 50 percent. 58 The total sum of building square-footage (residential and retail) is 268,723 square feet divided by 222,947 square feet or 5.12 acres equals 1.2 FAR.

CC 12-06-2022
363 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

considered significant impacts on the environment. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts with respect to aesthetics.

AIR QUALITY
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors) adversely
affecting a substantial number of
people?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section II, Air Quality, of the Adopted MND, addressed the air quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project. Air quality impacts were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR-1 and AIR-2 to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. Mitigation Measure AIR-1 required the project applicant to comply with the current Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) basic control measures for reducing fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and PM2.5) during construction, and Mitigation Measure AIR-2 required the project applicant to use of construction equipment with Level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPFs) and U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-rated Tier 3 engines to reduce the project’s localized construction emissions below the BAAQMD localized construction thresholds.

CC 12-06-2022
364 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-5
Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations equivalent to the Adopted MND mitigation measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts in CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(1) requires the project applicant to control fugitive dust during construction and implement the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Basic Control Measures included in the latest version of BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, to control fugitive dust (i.e., particulate matter PM2.5 and PM10) during demolition, ground disturbing activities and/or construction. The project applicant shall include these measures in the applicable construction documents, prior to issuance of the first permit. Additionally, CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(2) requires the project applicant to control construction exhaust and describes the procedures to be implemented. The CMC requirements include:

1. Control Fugitive Dust During Construction. Projects shall implement the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Basic Control Measures included in the latest version of BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, to control fugitive dust (i.e., particulate matter PM2.5 and PM10) during demolition, ground disturbing activities and/or construction. The project applicant shall include these measures in the applicable construction documents, prior to issuance of the first permit.

2. Control Construction Exhaust. Projects that disturb more than one-acre and are more than two months in duration, shall implement the following measures and the project applicant shall include them in the applicable construction document, prior to issuance of the first permit:
a. Utilize off-road diesel-powered construction equipment that is rated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Tier 4 or higher for equipment more than 25 horsepower. Any emissions control device used by the contractor shall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Tier 4 interim emissions standard for a similarly sized engine, as defined by the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) regulations. Applicable construction documents shall clearly show the selected emission reduction strategy for construction equipment over 25 horsepower.
b. Ensure that the construction contractor shall maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the project site for verification by the City. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and number of construction equipment on-site.
c. Ensure that all equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.

3. Control Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Paint. Projects shall use low-VOC paint (i.e., 50 grams per liter [g/L] or less) for interior and exterior wall architectural coatings. The project applicant shall include the use of low-VOC paint in the applicable construction documents prior to issuance of the first permit.

CC 12-06-2022
365 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Development of the proposed Modified Project is required to comply with CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(1), Control Fugitive Dust During Construction, and Section 17.04.050(A)(2), Control Construction Exhaust.

Accordingly, implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR-1 and AIR-2 as presented in the Adopted MND are no longer warranted. Mitigation Measure AIR-1 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer applicable because CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(1) includes the same requirements to implement BAAQMD best management practices for fugitive dust control. Mitigation Measure AIR-2 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer applicable because CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(2) for controlling construction emission exhaust is more effective at reducing diesel particulate matter (DPM) and PM2.5 because it requires USEPA rated Tier 4 offroad construction equipment, which has lower emission rates than Level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPF).

Discussion
Criterion a). The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is responsible for developing the Clean Air Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area.59 The Adopted MND determined that the Approved Project would not exceed the level of population or housing foreseen in City or regional planning efforts. The Approved Project would not have the potential to substantially affect housing, employment, and population projections within the region, which is the basis of the 2010 Clean Air Plan projections. Since adoption of the MND, BAAQMD has adopted its 2017 Clean Air Plan. Like the Approved Project, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would be consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan and would accommodate more infill housing within the city within a PDA and TPA. The proposed Modified Project would result in 18 additional residential units and 50 additional residents, and an increase of 27 employees, compared to the Approved Project. Like the Approved Project, the proposed Modified Project is not considered a regionally significant project under CEQA Guidelines Section 15206 that would warrant intergovernmental review by ABAG and MTC. As discussed in Section 4.12, Population and Housing, the proposed Modified Project would not exceed the level of population or housing projected in City or regional planning efforts (Plan Bay Area), and it would not have the potential to substantially affect housing, employment, and population projections within the region, which is the basis of the 2017 Clean Air Plan projections. Furthermore, the proposed Modified Project would not exceed the BAAQMD’s emissions thresholds (see discussion below). Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to conflicting with or obstructing implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

Criterion b). Like the Approved Project, construction and operation of the proposed Modified Project would result in an increase in short-term and long-term criteria air pollutant emissions over the same 59 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017, April. 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate. https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/plans/2017-clean-air-plan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-capvol-1-pdf.pdf?la=en CC 12-06-2022
366 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-7
length of time. However, the proposed Modified Project would only include one level of underground parking, which would reduce the amount of soil to be excavated; thus, also reducing the amount of excavation equipment and haul trucks to be used. The Modified Project would generate 1,2271,216 fewer daily vehicle trips compared to the Approved Project.
60, 61 As mobile source emissions would generate the
majority of increase in long-term criteria air pollutants, the decrease in daily vehicle trips would result in a decrease in operation-related emissions as well. As a result, like the Approved Project, the proposed Modified Project would not exceed the BAAQMD regional significance threshold. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the operational air quality impacts identified in the Approved MND.

The Adopted MND identified that the construction emissions of the Approved Project would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, which as discussed above is replaced by compliance with CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(1), which requires the project applicant to implement the BAAQMD Basic Control Measures included in the latest version of BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, to control fugitive dust (i.e., particulate matter PM2.5 and PM10) during demolition, ground disturbing activities and/or construction. The project applicant shall include these measures in the applicable construction documents, prior to issuance of the first permit. As a result, the Modified Project must control fugitive dust during construction in accordance with CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(1) and Mitigation Measure AIR-1 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer warranted. BAAQMD considers all impacts related to fugitive dust emissions from construction to be less than significant with implementation of BAAQMD’s best management practices. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to construction-related fugitive dust.

Criterion c). Average daily construction emissions associated with the Approved Project and the Modified Project would be similar and would be less than the BAAQMD regional construction thresholds. The Adopted MND identified implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-2, which required use of construction equipment with Level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPFs) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-rated Tier 3 engines to reduce the project’s localized construction emissions below the BAAQMD localized construction thresholds. However, as discussed above, Mitigation Measure AIR-2 has been replaced with CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(2), which requires construction contractor to utilize USEPA Tier 4 Interim engines for all equipment with more than 25 horsepower. Use of Tier 4 construction equipment has a higher control efficiency and lower emissions than Level 3 PDFs and Tier 3 equipment. As a result, Mitigation Measure AIR-2 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer warranted. With implementation of CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(2), criteria air pollutant emissions from construction equipment exhaust 60 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 61 Approved Project 5,205 average daily vehicle trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 average daily vehicle trips = -1,2271,216 trips.

CC 12-06-2022
367 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

would not exceed the BAAQMD average daily thresholds and impacts from project-related construction activities would be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to construction-related exhaust emissions.

The Modified Project would be required to comply with these regulations, which would contribute to further reduction of air quality emissions and potential health risk to people. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants.

Criterion d). Neither the Approved Project or the Modified Project would involve the type of development that would generate substantial odors or be subject to odors that would affect a substantial number of people. The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors from their operation include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. Residential or mixed-use buildings that would be allowed in the city are not associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to odors.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
LTS/M Yes No No No
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations
or by the California Department of
NI Yes No No No
CC 12-06-2022
368 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-9
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
LTS Yes No No No
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
LTS Yes No No No
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section III, Biological Resources, of the Adopted MND addressed the impacts to biological resources associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project. Impacts to biological resources were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to reduce potential impacts to birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Mitigation Measure BIO1 required the project applicant to take steps to avoid the breeding season from February 1 to August 31 or to conduct pre-construction surveys to confirm there are no active nests.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations equivalent to the Adopted MND Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to reduce impacts to nesting birds in CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(1) requires the project applicant to CC 12-06-2022
369 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

avoid nesting birds during construction and describes the procedures to be implemented to ensure avoidance. The CMC requirements include:

1. Avoid Nesting Birds During Construction. For all projects that involve removal of a tree (either protected or unprotected) or other vegetation suitable for nesting birds, or construction or grounddisturbing activities defined in Section 17.04.020, the project applicant shall comply with, and the construction contractor shall indicate the following on all construction plans, when required to ensure the following measures are performed to avoid inadvertent take of bird nests protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code when in active use:
a. Demolition, construction, ground-disturbing, and tree removal/pruning activities shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. If feasible, construction, grounddisturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities shall be completed before the start of the nesting season to help preclude nesting. The nesting season for most birds and raptors in the San Francisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31. Preconstruction surveys (described below) are not required for construction, ground-disturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities outside the nesting period.
b. If demolition, construction, ground-disturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities occur during the nesting season (February 1 and August 31), preconstruction surveys shall be conducted as follows:
i. No more than 7 days prior to the start of demolition, construction, ground-disturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities, in order to identify any active nests with eggs or young birds on the site and surrounding area within 100 feet of construction or tree removal activities. ii. Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals until demolition, construction, ground-disturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities have been initiated in the area, after which surveys can be stopped. As part of the preconstruction survey(s), the surveyor shall inspect all trees and other possible nesting habitats in, and immediately adjacent to, the construction areas for active nests, while ensuring that they do not disturb the nests as follows:

1. For projects that require the demolition or construction one single-family residence, ground disturbing activities affecting areas of up to 500 square feet, or the removal of up to three trees, the property owner or a tree removal contractor, if necessary, is permitted to conduct the preconstruction surveys to identify if there are any active nests. If any active nests with eggs or young birds are identified, the project applicant shall retain a qualified ornithologist or biologist to identify protective measures.

CC 12-06-2022
370 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-11

2. For any other demolition, construction and ground disturbing activity or the removal of four or more trees, a qualified ornithologist or biologist shall be retained by the project applicant to conduct the preconstruction surveys.
c. If the preconstruction survey does not identify any active nests with eggs or young birds that would be affected by demolition, construction, ground-disturbing or tree removal/pruning activities, no further mitigating action is required. If an active nest containing eggs or young birds is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by these activities, their locations shall be documented, and the qualified ornithologist or biologist shall identify protective measures to be implemented under their direction until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. d. Protective measures may include, but are not limited to, establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e., demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified ornithologist or biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds. The active nest within an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status. The radius of an exclusion zone may be increased by the qualified ornithologist or biologist, if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified ornithologist or biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The protection measures and buffers shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active.
e. A final report on nesting birds and raptors, including survey methodology, survey date(s), map of identified active nests (if any), and protection measures (if required), shall be prepared by the qualified ornithologist or biologist and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his or her designee, through the appropriate permit review process (e.g., demolition, construction, tree removal, etc.), and be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to the start of demolition, construction, ground-disturbing, or tree removal/pruning activities.

In addition, CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(2) requires the project applicant to avoid special-status roosting bats during construction and describes the procedures to be implemented to ensure avoidance. The CMC requirements include:

2. Avoid Special-Status Roosting Bats During Construction Permit Requirements a. For all projects that involve demolition, renovation, or re-tenanting of an abandoned or vacant building or structure, where the property owner cannot show evidence to the satisfaction of the CC 12-06-2022
371 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

City of Cupertino Building Inspector that the building or structure was appropriately sealed at the time the building or structure was vacated to prevent bats from roosting, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of the on-site buildings or structures prior to commencing any demolition, renovation, or re-tenanting activities. A building or structure is not appropriately sealed unless seal holes that are more than 0.5 inches in diameter or cracks that are 0.25 by 1.5 inches or larger are filled or closed with suitable material such as caulking, putty, duct tape, self-expanding polyurethane foam, 0.25-inch mesh hardware cloth, 0.5-inch or smaller welded wire mesh, installing tighter-fitting screen doors, or steel wool. b. The project applicant shall comply with, and the construction contractor shall include in the applicable construction documents, the following to ensure appropriate preconstruction surveys are performed and adequate avoidance provided for any special-status roosting bats, if encountered on the site. Preconstruction surveys shall:
i. Be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to tree removal or building demolition, renovation, or re-tenanting. Note that the preconstruction survey for roosting bats is required at any time of year since there is no defined bat roosting season as there is with nesting birds. ii. Be conducted no more than 14 days prior to start of tree removal or demolition, renovation, or re-tenanting.
iii. Be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated after which surveys can be stopped, unless construction activities are suspended for more than 7 consecutive days at which point the surveys shall be reinitiated.
iv. If no special-status bats are found during the survey(s), then no additional measures are warranted.
c. Protective measures shall be included in the applicable construction documents and implemented prior to issuance of permits, if any special-status bat species are encountered or for any roosts detected within the existing structures, where individual bats could be inadvertently trapped and injured or killed during demolition unless passively evicted in advance of construction activities.

Protective measures shall include:
i. If no maternity roosts are detected, adult bats can be flushed out of the structure or tree cavity using a one-way eviction door placed over the exit location for a minimum 48-hour period prior to the time tree removal or building demolition is to commence. ii. Confirmation by the qualified biologist that the one-way eviction door was effective, and that all bats have dispersed from the roost location, modifying any exclusion efforts to ensure CC 12-06-2022
372 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-13
individual bats have been successfully evicted in advance of initiating tree removal or building demolition.
iii. If a maternity roost is detected, and young are found roosting in a building identified for demolition, renovation, or re-tenanting, work shall be postponed until the young are flying free and are feeding on their own, as determined by the qualified biologist. iv. Once the qualified biologist has determined that any young bats can successfully function without the maternity roost, then the adults and young bats can be excluded from the structure to be demolished using the one-way eviction methods described above. v. Monitoring shall be provided by the qualified biologist as necessary to determine status of any roosting activity, success of any required bat exclusion, and status of any maternity roosting activity by bats, in the remote instance a maternity roost is encountered on the site.

Development of the proposed Modified Project is required to comply with CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(1), Avoid Nesting Birds During Construction, and Section 17.04.050(D)(2), Avoid Special-Status Roosting Bats During Construction Permit Requirements. Accordingly, implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer applicable because CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(1) includes the same requirements to implement protection of nesting birds pursuant to the MBTA. In addition, implementation of Section 17.04.050(D)(2) requires additional measures not included in the Adopted MND to further protect special-status species.

Discussion
Criteria a) through c). The proposed Modified Project would not change the project site boundaries and would not change the size or extent of disturbed areas that were analyzed in the Adopted MND. The analysis in the Adopted MND found that impacts to special-status species, including nesting birds, would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. As described above, CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(1) lists biological resources permit requirements in that are necessary to avoid inadvertent take of bird nests protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code, which is equivalent to the Adopted MND Mitigation Measure BIO-1. The proposed project would be required to avoid nesting season to the extent feasible. If not feasible, the proposed project must conduct preconstruction surveys pursuant to CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(1)(b) to ensure nesting birds would be protected. CMC Section 17.04.050(D)(2) would also be required to protect any special-status bats in the event that they should occupy the existing on-site buildings while the building are unoccupied prior to demolition. In addition, as described in Section 3.5.5, Bird Safe Design Ordinance, and Section 3.5.6, Outdoor Lighting Requirements, of this Addendum, the project applicant would be required to comply with CMC Section 19.102.030, Bird-safe Development Requirements, which includes glass, indoor lighting, and design standards to reduce bird collisions. Pursuant to CMC Section 19.102.040, Outdoor Lighting Requirements, which includes standards CC 12-06-2022
373 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

to reduce light pollution of the proposed buildings and landscaping. Both CMC Sections 19.102.303 and

19.102.120 have been adopted since the time of the Adopted MND and their implementation would further protect special-status species by reducing the potential of avian injury and mortality resulting from collisions with the proposed new buildings. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to special status species.

Criteria d) and e). Because the project site is the same under both projects, impacts related to riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and habitat conservation plans would be the same as the less-than-significant conclusions of the Adopted MND. The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, includes the removal of trees conflicting with design plans and would be required to comply with the CMC Chapter 14.12, Trees, and Chapter 14.18, Protected Tree Ordinance, to ensure impacts related to the removal of trees would remain consistent with the less-than-significant conclusions in the Adopted MND. Furthermore, as described previously, impacts to migratory birds would be the same as the less-than-significant impact identified in the Adopted MND through compliance with the CMC Section 19.102.030, Bird-safe Development Requirements, and CMC Section 19.102.040, Outdoor Lighting Requirements. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to sensitive wildlife and habitat areas or conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.

Overall, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts to biological resources that were analyzed in the Adopted MND.

CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a historical
resource as defined in
Section 15064.5?
NI Yes No No No
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
LTS/M Yes No No No
CC 12-06-2022
374 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-15
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
c) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a Tribal Cultural
Resource, defined in Public Resources
Code Section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American
Tribe, and that is:
• Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register
of historical resources as defined
in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
• A resource determined by the
lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1.

In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of the Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1
for the purposes of this
paragraph, the lead agency shall
consider the significance to a
California Native American tribe.

LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section IV, Cultural Resources, of the Adopted MND, addressed the cultural impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project. Cultural impacts were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures CULT-1 to reduce construction-related impacts on prehistoric and historic subsurface (i.e., archaeological) cultural resources, including tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measure CULT-1 required the project applicant to halt all work within 50 feet of any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources, including tribal cultural resources, if they are CC 12-06-2022
375 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

discovered during ground-disturbing activities and follow the identified procedures to protect the resources.

Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations equivalent to the Adopted MND mitigation measure to reduce construction-related impacts to prehistoric and historic subsurface cultural (i.e., archeological) resources, including tribal cultural resources, in CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. Section 17.04.050(E)(1), Protect Archaeological Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources, contains cultural resources permit requirements that are necessary to protect archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources. Same as Mitigation Measure CULT-1, the CMC requirements include providing written verification to the City that contractors and construction crews have been notified of basic archeological site indicators, the potential for discovery of archaeological resources, laws pertaining to these resources, and procedures for protecting cultural and tribal cultural resources. The project applicant would be required to comply with the protocols to ensure impacts to archeological and tribal cultural resources would be reduced. The CMC requirements include:

3. Protect Archaeological Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources. For all projects requiring grounddisturbing activities on land with no known archaeological or tribal cultural resources that has not been previously disturbed and/or where ground-disturbing activities would occur at a greater depth or affect a greater area than previously disturbed, the following shall be required:
a. Areas with No Known Cultural Resources. For all projects within areas where there are no known cultural resources, prior to soil disturbance, the project applicant shall provide written verification, including the materials provided to contractors and construction crews, to the City confirming that contractors and construction crews have been notified of basic archaeological site indicators, the potential for discovery of archaeological resources, laws pertaining to these resources, and procedures for protecting these resources as follows:
i. Basic archaeological site indicators that may include, but are not limited to, darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature; evidence of fires (ash, charcoal, fire affected rock or earth); concentrations of stone, bone, or shellfish; artifacts of stone, bone, or shellfish; evidence of living surfaces (e.g., floors); and burials, either human or animal. ii. The potential for undiscovered archaeological resources or tribal cultural resources on site. iii. The laws protecting these resources and associated penalties, including, but not limited to, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, Public Resources Code Section 5097, and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 and Section 7052. iv. The protection procedures to follow should construction crews discover cultural resources during project-related earthwork, include the following:

1. All soil disturbing work within 25 feet of the find shall cease.

CC 12-06-2022
376 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-17

2. The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to provide and implement a plan for survey, subsurface investigation, as needed, to define the deposit, and assessment of the remainder of the site within the project area to determine whether the resource is significant and would be affected by the project.

3. Any potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources found during construction activities shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation forms by a qualified archaeologist. If the resource is a tribal cultural resource, the consulting archaeologist shall consult with the appropriate tribe, as determined by the Native American Heritage Commission, to evaluate the significance of the resource and to recommend appropriate and feasible avoidance, testing, preservation or mitigation measures, in light of factors such as the significance of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations. The archeologist shall perform this evaluation in consultation with the tribe. b. Areas with Known Cultural Resources. For all projects within areas of known cultural resources as documented in the 2015 General Plan EIR Table 4.4-2, Cultural Resources in the Project Study Area and Vicinity, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced by the City, and the archaeological or tribal cultural resources cannot be avoided, in addition to the requirements in Section E.1.a for all construction projects with ground-disturbing activities, the following additional actions shall be implemented prior to ground disturbance:
i. The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct a subsurface investigation of the project site, and to ascertain the extent of the deposit of any buried archaeological materials relative to the project’s area of potential effects, in consultation with a tribal representative as applicable. The archaeologist shall prepare a site record and file it with the California Historical Resource Information System and the City of Cupertino. ii. If the resource extends into the project’s area of potential effects as determined by the archaeologist, the resource shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist to determine if the resource is eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources. If the qualified archaeologist determines that the resource is not eligible, no further action is required unless there is a discovery of additional resources during construction (as required above for all construction projects with ground-disturbing activities). If the qualified archaeologist determines that the resource is eligible, the qualified archaeologist shall identify ways to minimize the effect which the project applicant shall implement. A written report of the results of investigations and mitigations shall be prepared by the qualified archaeologist and filed with the California Historic Resources Information System Northwest Information Center and the City of Cupertino.

CC 12-06-2022
377 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Discussion
Under CEQA, both prehistoric and historic-period archaeological sites may qualify as historical resources.62 Archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, are addressed in criteria (b) and (c), and human remains are addressed below in criterion (d).

Criterion a). The project site currently includes commercial buildings developed in 1973 and the 1980s.

The existing building built in 1973 now falls within the 45-year time period established for historical resources that should be included in the Office of Historic Resources filing system the California Register of Historical Resources, but the building developed in the 1980s does not.63 The building developed in 1973 is not associated with significant cultural events or persons in California’s past and does not have any distinctive historical characteristics, and as such does not have any qualifying historical value. Therefore, demolition of the existing buildings on the project site, same as the Approved Project, would not affect any historic resources. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the loss of a historic building.

Criteria b) and c). Same as the Approved Project, construction of the Modified Project could result in the discovery of unearthed historical and pre-contact archaeological deposits, including those that are considered tribal cultural resources, at the project site and could be damaged or destroyed by grounddisturbing construction activities (e.g., site preparation, grading, excavation, and trenching for utilities) associated with development allowed under the proposed Modified Project. Should this occur, the ability of the resources to convey their significance, either as containing information about prehistory or history, or as possessing traditional or cultural significance to Native American or other descendant communities, would be materially impaired. The Adopted MND identified that the impacts to archaeological and tribal cultural resources would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1, which as discussed above is replaced by CMC Section 17.04.050(E)(1). This CMC section requires the project applicant to implement the procedures necessary to protect archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. Such requirements include providing written verification to the City that contractors and construction crews have been notified of basic archeological site indicators, the potential the potential for discovery of archaeological resources, laws pertaining to these resources, and procedures for protecting cultural and tribal cultural resources. As a result, the Modified Project must comply with the protocols to ensure impacts to archeological and tribal cultural resources would be reduced and Mitigation Measure CULT-1 as presented in the Adopted MND is no longer required. Therefore, the 62 California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15064.5(c), Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical and Unique Archeological Resources. 63 Office of Historic Preservation, Instructions For Recording Historical Resources, March 1995, page 2.

CC 12-06-2022
378 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-19
proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to archaeological and tribal cultural resources.

Criterion d). There are no known human remains on the project site; however, the potential to unearth undiscovered human remains during ground-disturbing activities associated with the construction of the project could occur. Any human remains encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed project would be subject to federal, State, and local regulations to ensure no adverse impacts to human remains would occur in the unlikely event human remains are found. The Adopted MND found impacts to be less than significant through compliance with mandatory procedures included in Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), which contain the mandated procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains.

Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified procedures, including compliance with the Health and Safety Code to protect human remains and Native American burials that the project applicant would have to comply with. CMC Section 17.04.050(E)(1)(a)(iii), listed above, ensures that the applicant would comply with the State’s laws and associated penalties that protect Native American and non-Native American human remains including, but not limited to, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, Public Resources Code Section 5097, and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050 and Section 7052. CMC Section 17.04.050(E)(2), Protect Human Remains and Native American Burials, requirements include:

2. Protect Human Remains and Native American Burials. The project applicant shall comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.
a. In the event of discovering human remains during construction activities, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site within a 100-foot radius of the remains, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains.
b. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified immediately and shall make a determination as to whether the remains are Native American.
c. If the Santa Clara County Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his authority, he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. d. The NAHC shall attempt to identify descendants (Most Likely Descendant) of the deceased Native American.
e. The Most Likely Descendant has 48 hours following access to the project site to make recommendations or preferences regarding the disposition of the remains. If the Most Likely Descendant does not make recommendations within 48 hours after being allowed access to the project site, the owner shall, with appropriate dignity, reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance and provide documentation about this determination and the CC 12-06-2022
379 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

location of the remains to the NAHC and the City of Cupertino. Alternatively, if the owner does not accept the Most Likely Descendant’s recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC. Construction shall halt until the mediation has concluded Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to human remain, including those of Native Americans.

ENERGY
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to
wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or
operation?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
Yes No No No
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or
local plan for renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
While these standards regarding energy impacts were adopted by the California Natural Resource Agency in December 2018 after the time of the Adopted MND, Section XV, Utilities and Services Systems, of the Adopted MND addressed energy impacts associated with Approved Project. Energy impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Development that could under the proposed Modified Project would generate energy use through electricity use and fuel consumption, same as the Approved Project. However, the proposed Modified CC 12-06-2022
380 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-21
Project would result in a net decrease of 1,2271,216 daily vehicle trips when compared to the Approved Project, which would reduce operational transportation energy.64,65 The proposed Modified Project would demolish the existing commercial buildings and construct a new mixed-use buildings resulting in an estimated 18 additional residential units and 50 additional residents, and an increase of 27 employees when compared to the Approved Project. The proposed utility infrastructure would connect to the existing water, sewer, storm drain system, and electricity network in the area, and would be served by an existing solid waste landfill. The proposed development would achieve LEED Silver (City’s preferred method), or equivalent Alternative Reference Standard, consistent with the City’s requirement (CMC Section 101.10.2 and Section 16.58.230). Therefore, the construction or installation of new infrastructure and capacity enhancing alterations would not be a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy.

The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would improve connectivity for pedestrians and bicyclists as it would keep the existing sidewalks and bike facilities along the length of the project site.

There will also be sidewalks and pedestrian entrances to the proposed mixed-use buildings, which would connect with the internal sidewalks on the project site. In addition, the proposed Modified Project would provide Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking facilities as required, like the Approved Project. 66 As described
in Section 4.10, Land Use and Planning, and Section 4.12, Population and Housing, the proposed Modified Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation and would not result in new growth potential from what was considered in the General Plan EIR, respectively.

The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would meet the 2022 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards of the California Public Resources Code, Title 24, Part 6, which applies to any project whose permit applications are applied for on or after January 1, 2023. The 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards improve upon the 2019 Standards and build on California’s technology innovations, encouraging energy efficient approaches to encourage building decarbonization and to be responsive to climate change. The 2022 Standards require more energy efficiency for residential and non-residential buildings.67
64 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 65 Approved Project 5,205 average daily vehicle trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 average daily vehicle trips = -1,2271,216 trips.
66 Class 1 facilities protect the entire bicycle from theft, vandalism, and inclement weather and are appropriate for long-term storage. Class 2 facilities include bicycle racks to which the frame and at least one wheel can be secured with a user-provided lock. 67 California Energy Commission, December 2021. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2022/2022-building-energy-efficiency-standards-residential-and-nonresidential, accessed July 21, 2022.

CC 12-06-2022
381 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

The City’s Green Building Ordinance contains mandatory, minimum required green building techniques, including measures affecting water use efficiency and water conservation. Thus, new buildings constructed in accordance with the General Plan land use designation and to the standards identified above would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations that require energy use to be reduced in CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. Specifically, CMC Section

17.04.050(C), Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Permit Requirements, requires the project applicant to complete the City of Cupertino Climate Action Plan – Development Project Consistency Checklist, for review and approval by the City Environment and Sustainability Department prior to issuance of the first permit, to demonstrate how the project is consistent with the Cupertino Climate Action Plan, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, in order to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and conserve energy.

As described above in Section 3.5.8.1, Energy Conservation, the City enforces the CALGreen Building Standards, which establish planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), in CMC Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code Adopted. CMC Section 16.54.100(2), Newly Construction Building, requires all newly constructed buildings to be All-Electric Buildings. All-Electric Buildings are defined as a building that has no natural gas or propane plumbing installed within the building, and that uses electricity as the sole source of energy for its space heating, water heating.68 The City approved reach codes in February 2020,69 which go above California Energy Code requirements to reduce energy, water, and associated GHG emissions. Energy conserving features of the proposed Modified Project would include new landscaping that is native and/or adaptive, and drought resistant plants to conserve water and subsequently save energy.

As discussed below in Section 4.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the proposed Modified Project would generate less GHG emissions than the Approved Project due to the reduction of daily vehicle trips, which also includes if the project applicant were to apply for an exemption to CMC Section 16.54.100(2) in CMC Section 16.54.100(2)(A) that would permit using natural gas under limited circumstances approved by the City. Like the Approved Project, the Modified Project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, all which involve planning for use of renewable energy planning and energy efficiency standards.

Overall, the proposed Modified Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, or conflict with or obstruct a 68 CMC Section 16.54.110, Definitions and Rules of Construction. 69 Cities may adopt more stringent building codes for energy use than those required by the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), which are known as “reach codes.” CC 12-06-2022
382 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-23
state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the energy impacts that were analyzed in the Adopted MND.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
-- -- -- -- --
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map,
issued by the State Geologist
for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division
of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

LTS Yes No No No
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? LTS Yes No No No
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
LTS Yes No No No
iv) Landslides? LTS Yes No No No
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in onor off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or
property?
LTS Yes No No No
CC 12-06-2022
383 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of
wastewater?
NI N/A No No No
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature? *
LTS/M Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable *This criteria is found in the Cultural Resources section of the Adopted MND. It has since been moved from Cultural Resources to Geology and Soils in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form.

Adopted MND
Section VI, Geology and Soils, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts to geologic resources associated with the Approved Project. The impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required. Since the time of the Adopted MND, the CEQA Guidelines have been updated and impacts related to paleontological resources, which were addressed in the cultural resources topic are now addressed in this section. Therefore, Section IV, Cultural Resources, of the Adopted MND, addressed impacts related to paleontological and unique geological resources. Impacts were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-2, which required the project applicant to halt all work within 50 feet of the resources if any fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during ground-disturbing activities and follow the identified procedures to protect the resources.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
Since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations equivalent to the Adopted MND mitigation measure to reduce construction-related impacts to paleontological resources in CMC Chapter

17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. CMC Section 17.04.050(H), Paleontological Resources Permit Requirements, provides protocols to protect paleontological resources during construction that the project applicant must adhere to in the event that there is a find. The CMC requirements include:

Protect Paleontological Resources During Construction. If paleontological resources are encountered during ground disturbing and/or other construction activities, all construction shall be temporarily CC 12-06-2022
384 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-25
halted or redirected to allow a qualified paleontologist, which shall be retained by the project applicant, to assess the find for significance. If paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontological monitor shall determine appropriate actions, in coordination with a qualified paleontologist, City staff, and property owner. Appropriate actions may include, but are not limited to, a mitigation plan formulated pursuant to guidelines developed by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology and implemented to appropriately protect the significance of the resource by preservation, documentation, and/or removal, prior to recommencing activities. Measures may include, but are not limited to, salvage of unearthed fossil remains and/or traces (e.g., tracks, trails, burrows); screen washing to recover small specimens; preparation of salvaged fossils to a point of being ready for curation (e.g., removal of enclosing matrix, stabilization and repair of specimens, and construction of reinforced support cradles); and identification, cataloging, curation, and provision for repository storage of prepared fossil specimens.

Discussion
Criteria a) through d). The geologic setting, including soils, groundwater, fault rupture, liquefaction, dry seismic settlement, lateral spreading, and expansive soils of the project site have not changed since the time of the Adopted MND. The proposed Modified Project would introduce revisions that would change the design of the proposed development by adding residential units and eliminating the hotel, and would include one additional floor on two of the building and only have one level of subterranean parking as opposed to two levels when compared to the Approved Project. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not introduce new adverse physical impacts related to seismic ground shaking, ground failure, liquefaction, landslides, soil erosion, or expansive soils compared to the Approved Project. Like the Approved Project, the proposed Modified Project would adhere to the applicable building code, including conformance to California Building Code (CBC) Site Class and Site Seismic Coefficients and the grading erosion control measures, and the City’s building permit requirements to ensure that the impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking, unstable soils, and expansive soils are minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the seismic-related and soil impacts that were analyzed in the Adopted MND.

Criterion e): Like the Approved Project, the Modified Project would not require the construction or use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Wastewater generated by the proposed project would be conveyed to the existing municipal sanitary sewer system in Cupertino, where multiple connections would be made along Alves Drive, North De Anza Boulevard, and Bandley Drive. Therefore, there would be no impact from the Modified Project associated with soils that are inadequate for the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No mitigation measures would be required.

Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in CC 12-06-2022
385 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

magnitude of the impacts related so septic tanks or alternate wastewater disposal systems that were analyzed in the Adopted MND.

Criterion f). Criterion (c) from Section IV, Cultural Resources, in the Approved MND identifies Mitigation Measure CULT-2 to add temporary protection measures if fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction. CMC Section 17.04.050(H)Compliance with CMC Section 17.04.050(H) and State regulations would apply under the proposed Modified Project. Unique geological features are not common in Cupertino. The geology and soils on the project site are common throughout the city and region and are not considered to be unique. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts related to paleontological and unique geological features.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section VII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts from GHG emissions associated with the Approved Project. GHG emissions impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

CC 12-06-2022
386 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-27
Discussion
Criteria a) and b). Similar to the Approved Project, construction and operation of the proposed Modified Project would generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from vehicle trips from the future development (e.g., residents, visitors, employees), energy use (indirectly from purchased electricity use, and directly through fuel consumed for building heating), area sources (e.g., landscaping equipment used on-site, consumer products, coatings), water/wastewater generation, and waste disposal. The proposed Modified Project would not exceed the development potential evaluated in the Approved MND and would generate 1,2271,216 fewer daily vehicle trips compared to the Approved Project. 70,71 As a result, the Modified
Project would generate less GHG emissions than the Approved Project. Additionally, the City of Cupertino has adopted the California Energy Code (CMC Chapter 16.54) that requires all newly constructed buildings to be All-Electric Buildings (CMC Section 16.54.100(2)). Therefore, Modified Project would not utilize natural gas use within the building unless the project applicant applies for an exemption to CMC Section

16.54.100(2) in CMC Section 16.54.100(2)(A) that would permit using natural gas under limited circumstances approved by the City. For example, the project applicant could apply to use natural gas in the potential restaurant use spaces up to 41,26841,589 square feet, which assumes all commercial space is used for restaurants. Even with approval of this exception and the unlikely event that all the commercial space is used for restaurants, the Modified Project would use less natural gas (4,113,2744,175,454 kBTU/year) than the Approved Project (6,597,856 kBTU/year) and would therefore, still generate less GHG emissions than the Approved Project. In addition, the City of Cupertino’s Green Building Standards Code requires installation of Level 2 Electric Vehicle (EV) Ready Circuit for new multifamily dwellings (Chapter

16.58.400 and Chapter 16.58.420). The proposed Modified Project would also not result in wasteful or inefficient use of energy (see Section 4.5, Energy) or conflict with the City’s transportation goals under Senate Bill 743 (see Section 4.15, Transportation). Like the Approved Project, the Modified Project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

Furthermore, since the time of the Adopted MND, the City has codified regulations that require energy use to be reduced in CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements. Specifically, CMC Section 17.04.050(C) requires the project applicant to complete the City of Cupertino Climate Action Plan – Development Project Consistency Checklist, for review and approval by the City Environment and Sustainability Department prior to issuance of the first permit, to demonstrate how the project is consistent with the Cupertino Climate Action Plan, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve energy. Accordingly, the proposed changes from the Modified Project would not result in an increase in magnitude of the existing GHG emissions under the Approved Project.
70 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 71 Approved Project 5,205 trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 trips = -1,2271,216 trips.

CC 12-06-2022
387 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
LTS/M Yes No No No
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste
within 0.25 miles of an existing or
proposed school?
NI Yes No No No
d) Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
LTS Yes No No No
e) For a project located within an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project
area?
NI Yes No No No
f) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
NI Yes No No No
g) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable CC 12-06-2022
388 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-29
Adopted MND
Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Adopted MND, addressed the hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project.

Impacts related to hazardous materials were found to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1a and HAZ-1b to reduce construction-related impacts from hazardous materials. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1a required the project applicant to assess and properly remove and dispose of asbestos containing materials (ACMs), if found to be present in on-site buildings, and Mitigation Measure HAZ-1b required the project applicant to assess and properly remove and dispose of lead-based paints (LBP), if found to be present in on-site buildings, pursuant to applicable federal, State, and local regulations.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1a: The project Applicant shall hire the services of a CalOSHA-certified qualified asbestos abatement consultant to conduct a pre-construction assessment for asbestos containing materials (ACMs). Prior to the issuance of the demolition permit, the Applicant shall provide a letter to the City of Cupertino Planning Department from a qualified asbestos abatement consultant that no ACMs are present in the buildings. If ACMs are found to be present, the hazardous materials shall be properly removed and disposed of prior to demolition of buildings on the project site in compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, such as the EPA’s Asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation, BAAQMD Regulation 11, Title 8 of the California Codes of Regulations, the Unified Program, and the City’s General Plan policies.

Mitigation Measure HAZ-1b: The project Applicant shall hire the services of a qualified lead paint abatement consultant to conduct a pre-construction assessment of lead-based paints. Prior to the issuance of the demolition permit, the applicant shall provide a letter to the City of Cupertino Planning Department from a qualified lead paint abatement consultant that no lead paint is present in on-site buildings. If lead paint is found to be present on buildings to be demolished, the hazardous materials shall be properly removed and disposed of in compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, including the EPA’s NESHAP regulation, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 8 of the California Codes of Regulations, the Unified Program, and the City’s General Plan Policies.

Discussion
Criteria a) and b). The proposed Modified Project would not increase risks related to hazards or hazardous materials relative to the Approved Project by increasing the number of residential units and removing the hotel as these are similar uses that would not would not involve the routine transport or disposal of CC 12-06-2022
389 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

hazardous materials. Therefore, operational impacts would be the same less-than-significant impact.

Likewise, the construction of the project would demolish the existing buildings that have the potential to expose nearby receptors sensitive to air quality and construction workers to ACMs or LBPs. Accordingly, the Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would be required to implement Mitigation Measures HAZ-1a and HAZ-1b. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.040.04(B), the project applicant had a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared in March 2022 and due to the historic dry cleaning use on the project site had a Phase II ESA prepared in May 2022. The results of the Phase II ESA found no additional investigation is recommended since the chemicals of potential concern were not detected above their respective commercial screening levels. The Phase I ESA also recognized that the project site was formerly developed with agriculture land and/or residential/farmstead from as early as 1897 through the late-1960s. The De Anza Boulevard parcel was developed with the current building in 1973, while the Bandley Drive parcel was developed with the current building in 1979.72 According to the Department of Toxic Substance Control, organic pesticides warrant further testing for orchards or other agricultural uses that were active after 1950.
73 While the project site was historically used for agricultural purposes the site is either paved over or covered by structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining contaminants in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations would have most likely been present, if at all) were likely mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, the potential former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern and impacts would be the same as those for the Approved Project. However, the project applicant would comply with the regulations that the City codified after approval of the 2016 MND (CMC Section 17.04.040(B)(3)(A)). Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the release of hazardous materials during demolition of existing buildings.

Criterion c). As described in Section 3.2, Local Setting, there are two schools within 0.25 miles of the project site (i.e., St. Joseph of Cupertino School roughly 0.07 miles (390 feet) to the east and Happy Days Child Development Center 0.16 miles (850 feet) to the west). There are no known plans of a proposed school in this range. The proposed Modified Project would not involve the storage, handling, or disposal of hazardous materials in sufficient quantities to pose a significant risk to the public. Furthermore, as discussed in Section 4.2, Air Quality, criterion (c), implementation of CMC Section 17.04.050(A)(2), Control 72 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2022. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 10145 N De Anza Boulevard and 10118-10122 Bandley Drive, Cupertino, California 95014, March 21. Genesis Engineering & Redevelopment, 2022, letter results of the soil testing (also known as a Phase II ESA), May 18. 73 California Department of Toxic Substances Control California Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties, page 3, August 7, 2008.

CC 12-06-2022
390 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-31
Construction Exhaust, criteria air pollutant emissions from construction equipment exhaust would not exceed the BAAQMD average daily thresholds and impacts from project-related construction activities would not have a potential health risk to people, including the children at St. Joseph of Cupertino or the Happy Days Child Development Center. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the release of hazardous materials during construction or operational phases within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school.

Criterion d). Based on a recent search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor Database, which is the data management system for tracking our cleanup, permitting, enforcement and investigation efforts at hazardous waste facilities and sites with known contamination or sites where there may be reasons to investigate further, no hazardous materials sites are located on the project site.74 Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to being located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.

Criterion e). Same as the Approved Project, the project site is not within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public use airport. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to public airport hazards.

Criterion f). The proposed Modified Project would include the same general egress/ingress (i.e., Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard) as the Approved Project and would not block roads nor impede emergency access to surrounding properties or neighborhoods during construction or operation. Furthermore, the proposed Modified Project would generate an estimated 1,2271,216 fewer daily vehicle trips compared to the Approved Project, therefore, further reducing potential conflicts with an adopted emergency response plan, or emergency evacuation plan when compared to the Approved Project.
75,76 Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Criterion g). The project site is located within a California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) designated Local Responsibility Area (LRA) and outside of very high fire hazard severity zone 74 California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Database, https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=10118+to+10122+Bandley+Drive+cupertino, accessed August 5, 2022; Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2022. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 10145 N De Anza Boulevard and 10118-10122 Bandley Drive, Cupertino, California 95014, March 21. 75 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 76 Approved Project 5,205 average daily vehicle trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 average daily vehicle trips = -1,2271,216 trips.

CC 12-06-2022
391 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

(VHFHSZ). The project site is not near lands designated as a State Responsibility Area (SRA) by CAL FIRE.

The project site is approximately 2 miles northeast from the nearest VHFHSZ or land designated by CAL FIRE as a SRA. The project site is not located within the Cupertino or CAL FIRE designated wildland-urban interface (WUI), which is an area of transition between wildland (unoccupied land) and land with human development (occupied land).77 Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to wildfires.

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Violate any water quality standards
or waste discharge requirements?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in
flooding on- or of-site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial
LTS Yes No No No
77 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2018. Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Threat. http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d45bf08448354073a26675776f2d09cb, accessed August 5, 2022; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. “FHSZ Viewer.” https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed August 5, 2022; City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Chapter 16.74. Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area; City of Cupertino. 2015. General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040, Health and Safety Chapter, Figure HS-1.

CC 12-06-2022
392 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-33
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
additional sources of polluted
runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the Adopted MND, addressed the hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project. Hydrology and water quality impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criteria a) through e). The project setting and regulatory setting is the same for the Approved Project and the Modified Project. The Approved Project, like the proposed Modified Project, would be connected to municipal water supplies and no groundwater wells would be located on the property. The proposed Modified Project would include 166,445 square feet of impervious surfaces, which is a decrease from existing conditions (209,783 square feet) and the Approved Project (209,450 square feet). The project site is not located in close proximity to the San Francisco Bay or the Pacific Ocean, and is not within a mapped tsunami inundation zone. Further, the proposed Modified Project would have less water demand than the Approved Project (see Section 4.16, Utilities and Service Systems).

Same as the Approved Project, because the proposed Modified Project would disturb one or more acres during construction, the project applicant would be required to comply with the Municipal Regional Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and submit Permit Registration CC 12-06-2022
393 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Documents to the California State Water Resources Control Board prior to the start of construction. The Permit Registration Documents include a Notice of Intent (NOI) and a site-specific construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP describes the incorporation of BMPs to control sedimentation, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction.

New requirements by the State Water Resources Control Board would also require the project applicant to prepare a construction SWPPP that includes post-construction treatment measures aimed at minimizing stormwater runoff. With implementation of these measures, water quality impacts during construction would be reduced to a less-than-significant level same as the Approved Project.

In addition, all new development or redevelopment projects that create and/or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces would be required to incorporate source control, site design, and stormwater treatment measures into the project, pursuant to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) C.3 requirements. The requirements include minimization of impervious surfaces, measures to detain or infiltrate runoff from peak flows to match pre-development conditions, and agreements to ensure that the stormwater treatment and flow control facilities are maintained in perpetuity. The proposed Modified Project would do so through pervious pavements, flowthrough planters, and green roof. Because the proposed Modified Project would include less impervious surfaces and less water, and would comply with the same regulatory requirements, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to a violation any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.

LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Physically divide an established
community?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any
land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental
effect?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable CC 12-06-2022
394 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-35
Adopted MND
Section X, Land Use and Planning, of the Adopted MND, addressed the land use and planning impacts associated with the operation and construction of the Approved Project. Land use and planning impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criterion a). Same as the Approved Project, the Modified Project would occur on a site that is currently developed, would retain the existing roadway patterns, and would not introduce any new major roadways or other physical features through existing residential neighborhoods or other communities that would create new barriers, the project would not physically divide an established community. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the division of an established community.

Criterion b.) Same as the Approved Project, the Modified Project would be consistent with the types of development envisioned in the Heart of the City Special Area and North Crossroads Node, and does not include a request for amendments to the existing General Plan land use designation or zoning district. As described in Section 3.1.1.3, Density Bonus Elements, the proposed Modified Project would include the incorporation of BMR units, and is therefore entitled to increase the proposed height and number of housing units consistent with the State’s density bonus law and the City’s density bonus ordinance.

Through the incorporation of density bonus, the proposed Modified Project would have a residential density of approximately 40 du/ac and maximum building heights of58 feet and 8 inches at the roofline, and 64 feet and 8 inches at the stair tower for Building A; 43 feet and 9 inches at the roofline and 49 feet and 9 inches at the stair tower for Building B; and 55 feet roofline and 61 feet at the stair tower for Building C. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to land use policies aimed at reducing environmental impacts.

CC 12-06-2022
395 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

NOISE
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Result in the generation of a
substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess
of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Result in the generation of excessive
groundborne noise levels?
LTS Yes No No No
c) For a project located within the
vicinity of a private airstrip or an
airport land use plan or, where such
a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section XI, Noise, of the Adopted MND, addressed the noise impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Approved Project. Noise impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criterion a). Like the Approved Project, potential temporary increases in ambient noise levels for the Modified Project would be associated with construction activities. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction: (1) mobile-source noise from the transport of workers, material deliveries, and debris/soil hauling; and (2) on-site noise from use of construction equipment. Construction CC 12-06-2022
396 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-37
activities under the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, are anticipated to last approximately three years.

The transport of workers and materials to and from the construction site would incrementally increase noise levels along local roadways under both scenarios. Same as the Approved Project, primary access routes for construction vehicles to the project site would be North De Anza Boulevard, Alves Drive, and Bandley Drive. Project-related construction worker vehicles, haul trucks, and vendor trucks could pass by existing hotel and residential uses along Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and De Anza Boulevard north and east of the project site. Construction-related activities would generate worker, vendor, and soil haul trips. The demolition and grading phases would generate the most trips due to soil haul. The proposed Modified Project would only include one level of underground parking, which would reduce the amount of soil to be excavated when compared to the Approved Project that would have two levels of underground parking; thus, also reducing the amount of excavation equipment and haul trucks to be used. Therefore, noise generated from construction-related truck traffic would be less under the proposed Modified Project and would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the construction noise impacts identified in the Approved MND.

The Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would be required to comply with the construction hours stated in CMC Section 10.48.053, Grading, Construction and Demolition. Because the noise-sensitive receptors and construction of the proposed Modified Project is roughly the same as the Approved Project, with less excavation and one additional level on Buildings A and B occurring under the Modified Project, the construction noise levels would be expected to remain an average 78 dBA Leq at nearby offices, 72 dBA Leq at adjacent banks, 72 dBA Leq at the Aloft Hotel, and 70 dBA Leq at the apartments across Alves Drive.

Therefore, construction activity would not be expected to exceed the noise ordinance’s limit of 80 dBA (Lmax). Because the noise-sensitive receptors lie within 750 feet of the construction boundary, project construction would not be allowed on weekends pursuant to CMA Section 10.48.053. Due to the distances of the noise-sensitive receptors, the limitation on construction hours to the least noise-sensitive portion of the day (7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.), and the construction activity noise level limit, impacts at offsite receptors from construction equipment for the Modified Project would be the same as the Approved Project. Additionally, the development of either the Approved Project or the Modified Project would be required to comply with CMC Section 17.04.050(G)(2), Manage Noise During Construction, which requires the applicant and contractor to submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the first permit. The Construction Noise Control Plan would demonstrate compliance with daytime and nighttime decibel limits based on the type of construction equipment, distance of construction activities from sensitive receptors, site terrain, and other project features. Additional requirements of CMC Section 17.04.050(G)(2) include selecting haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive uses, posting signs that reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling, and the use of noise producing signals only for safety warning purposes.

Furthermore, 10 days prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the project applicant would be CC 12-06-2022
397 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

required to send out notices to off-site businesses within 500 feet of the project site. Therefore, noise impacts from construction equipment would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the construction noise impacts identified in the Approved MND.

The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would generate noise associated with additional vehicles traveling to and from the project site on local roadways. However, the proposed Modified Project would generate an estimated 1,2271,216 fewer daily vehicle trips compared to the Approved Project.
78,79 Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the mobile-source noise impacts identified in the Approved MND.

Stationary (non-transportation) noise sources associated with the proposed Modified Project would include heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units on the roofs of the buildings, same as the Approved Project. The nearest noise-sensitive receptors that could potentially be affected by HVAC units are the nearby Aloft Hotel to the north across Bandley Drive and residential uses to the northwest across Alves Drive and Bandley Drive, which is the same setting described in the Adopted MND. However, like the Approved Project, ambient noise levels at the hotel and residences are already elevated under existing conditions due to heavy traffic flows on both Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. Therefore, the noise levels due to the proposed Modified Project’s HVAC units would be lower than ambient noise levels caused by the traffic-related sources. Additionally, machinery and other stationary sources of noise are regulated by the CMC Section 10.48.040, Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels, which requires that noise limits of 60 dBA and 50 dBA at residential uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively, and 65 dBA and 55 dBA at non-residential sensitive uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the stationary-source noise impacts identified in the Approved MND.

Criterion b). Operation of the proposed Modified Project, like that Approved Project, would not include any long-term vibration sources such as industrial machinery or railroad operations. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the operational vibration impacts identified in the Approved MND.

Lastly, the construction of the Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would require the use of heavy construction equipment that could cause vibration. Because the Modified Project is roughly the same construction timeline and building envelope, with less excavation, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the construction vibration impacts identified in the Approved MND.
78 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 79 Approved Project 5,205 average daily vehicle trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 average daily vehicle trips = -1,2271,216 trips.

CC 12-06-2022
398 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-39
Criterion c). Same as the Approved Project, the project site is not within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public use airport. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to airport noise.

POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Induce substantial unexpected
population growth or growth for
which inadequate planning has
occurred, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads
or other infrastructure)?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing people or housing,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section XII, Population and Housing, of the Adopted MND, addressed the population and housing impacts associated with the Approved Project. Population and housing impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criterion a). The proposed project would result in a planned level of growth based on the local growth projections in the General Plan. The proposed project does not include a request amendments to the existing General Plan land use designation or zoning district. As discussed in Section 3.6.2, Population and Employee Estimates, the proposed Modified Project would result in 591 total residents and 9192 total employees. This represents a net increase of 50 additional residents and an 2728 additional employees.

Conservatively assuming all 591 new residents would move to Cupertino, the new residents would CC 12-06-2022
399 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

represent 4.5 percent of the residential growth projected in the General Plan EIR . 80 Conservatively
assuming all 9192 employees are new employees, they would represent 0.5 percent of the employee growth projected in the General Plan EIR.
81 Therefore, the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, is well within the population projections considered in the General Plan EIR and projected by ABAG. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to substantial population growth.

Criterion b). Same as the Approved Project, the project site is currently developed with two single-story commercial buildings and associated surface parking. Thus, there is no existing housing or people on the project site and no housing or people would be displaced by the proposed Modified Project. the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the displacement of housing or people.

PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
a) Fire protection? LTS Yes No No No
b) Police protection? LTS Yes No No No
c) Schools? LTS Yes No No No
d) Libraries? LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable 80 591 new residents divided by 12,988 General Plan EIR projected residents = 4.5 percent. 81 9192 new employees divided by 16,855 General Plan EIR projected employees = 0.5 percent (This is a conservative estimate that does not take into consideration the existing employees currently on the site.) CC 12-06-2022
400 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-41
Adopted MND
Section XII, Public Services, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts to public service associated with the Approved Project. Public Service impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criteria a) though d). Public service providers for fire protection, police protection, schools, and library services in the City of Cupertino include the Santa Clara County Fire District, the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office and West Valley Patrol Division, the Cupertino Union School District and Fremont Union High School District , and the Santa Clara County Library District, respectively, of whom provide public services citywide.

The purpose of the public services impact analysis is to examine the impacts associated with physical improvements to public service facilities required to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. Public service facilities may need improvements (i.e., construction, renovation, or expansion) as demand for services increase. Increased demand is typically driven by increases in population. The proposed project would have a significant environmental impact if it would exceed the ability of public service providers to adequately serve residents, thereby requiring construction of new facilities or modification of existing facilities.

As discussed in Section 4.12, Population and Housing, the proposed Modified Project would result in 4.5 percent of the General Plan EIR residential growth and 0.35 percent of the employee growth. 82 Accordingly, like the Approved Project, the Modified Project is well within the population projections considered in the General Plan EIR and projected by ABAG. In addition, the applicant for the proposed Modified Project would be required to pay developer impact fees to the Cupertino Union School District and Fremont Union High School District that provide support to schools to offset the project’s fair share of impacts to schools. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to public services.
82 591 new residents divided by 12,988 General Plan EIR projected residents = 4.5 percent. 9192 new employees divided by 16,855 General Plan EIR projected employees = 0.5 percent (This is a conservative estimate that does not take into consideration the existing employees currently on the site.) CC 12-06-2022
401 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

PARKS AND RECREATION
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Include recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section XIII, Parks and Recreation, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts to parks and recreation services associated with the Approved Project. Parks and recreation impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criteria a) and b). The City of Cupertino Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance of the City’s 16 parks, five special use sites, nine school sports fields, and four trail corridors, 83 and regional
park facilities operated by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD) and the Santa Clara County Parks could be used by residents and employees of the proposed Modified Project, same as the Approved Project. The proposed Modified Project would result in about 50 additional residents and an increase of 27 employees when compared to the Approved Project. Because the Adopted MND conservatively assumed all the residents would be new to Cupertino and did not factor in that there are existing employees on the site, this change in the number of residents and employees would not cause 83 City of Cupertino, 2020. Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, Introduction.

CC 12-06-2022
402 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-43
substantial physical deterioration of City or regional parks. Furthermore, the Modified Project is within the buildout assumptions assumed for the project site in the General Plan EIR (see Table 1-1, General Plan EIR and Project Comparisons) which found impacts to parks and recreation to be less than significant. Like the Approved Project, the Modified Project’s payment of City-required impact fees would contribute to the City’s parks and recreation fund. The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 13.08, Park Land Dedication Fee, and Chapter 18.24, Dedications and Reservations, which require the payment of impact fees to maintain existing parks and recreation facilities and offset their fair share of impacts to parklands. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to parks and recreation.

TRANSPORTATION
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Conflict with a program, plan,
ordinance or policy addressing the
circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
c) Substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
NI Yes No No No
d) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section XIV, Transportation, of the Adopted MND, addressed the transportation impacts associated with the Approved Project. Transportation impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

CC 12-06-2022
403 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criteria a) and b). The proposed Modified Project would generate 1,2271,216 fewer daily vehicle trips compared to the Approved Project.
84,85 Therefore, as a general matter, the proposed Modified Project would generate fewer transportation impacts when compared to the Approved Project. The existing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit network is the same for the Approved Project as the Modified Project.

Pedestrian walkways are proposed within the Modified Project for safe connections between buildings, particularly between the hotel and nearby retail and restaurants on Stevens Creek Boulevard. The proposed Modified Project does not propose any street network changes, nor any changes to pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The proposed Modified Project would include Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking as described in Section 3.6.7, Sustainability Features. While the proposed Modified Project does not include the pedestrian paseo between Building A and Building B that was included in the Approved Project, as shown on Figure 3-3, an internal “Main Paseo” would be created to connect Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard between all three buildings. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would have adequate availability of alternative modes of travel including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. The proposed project would not displace, modify, or interfere with any transit stop, sidewalk, or bicycle lanes. Therefore, the project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. With respect to construction trips, as described previously, the proposed Modified Project would include less excavation and therefore less haul trucks, therefore, reducing construction transportation when compared to the Approved Project.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(1), projects within 0.25 miles of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high quality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a lessthan-significant transportation impact. On February 16, 2021, the City adopted CMC Chapter 17.08, Evaluation of Transportation Impacts Under the California Environmental Quality Act, which provides screening criteria and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thresholds for land-use development projects, transportation projects, and other projects pursuant to the CEQA. As discussed in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, the location of the project site meets this criteria. Accordingly, no transportation impacts related to VMT from the proposed project are presumed. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to conflicts with policies addressing the circulation network. 84 Fehr & Peers, 20212022. Marina Plaza Trip Generation Update and VMT Screening Assessment. 85 Approved Project 5,205 average daily vehicle trips – Modified Project 3,9783,989 average daily vehicle trips = -1,2271,216 trips.

CC 12-06-2022
404 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-45
Criteria c) and d). The proposed Modified Project would include the same general egress/ingress (i.e., Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard) as the Approved Project and would not block roads nor impede emergency access to surrounding properties or neighborhoods during construction or operation. Emergency vehicle access for the project site would be provided from Alves Drive, Bandley Drive, and Stevens Creek Boulevard. As with the Approved Project, all emergency access driveway and onsite roads for the proposed Modified Project, would be designed in accordance with City of Cupertino standards and would have to be reviewed and approved by SCCFD. The SCCFD and City of Cupertino Building Division coordinate the review of building permits. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to potentially unsafe roadway features that would increase hazards. No impact would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required.

UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of water, wastewater
treatment or stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the
project that it does not have
adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
LTS Yes No No No
CC 12-06-2022
405 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of
State or local standards, or in excess
of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste
reduction goals?
LTS Yes No No No
e) Comply with federal, State, and local
statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
Section XV, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Adopted MND, addressed the impacts to utilities and service systems associated with the Approved Project. Utilities and service system impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

Discussion
Criterion a). Like the Approved Project, the proposed Modified Project would be served by the Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) for sanitary sewer services and wastewater would be treated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP). Municipal storm water discharges in the City of Cupertino are subject to the Waste Discharge Requirements of the new Municipal Regional Permit (MRP; Order Number R2-2022-0018) and NPDES Permit Number CAS612008, which became effective on July 1, 2022. The MRP currently allows dry weather discharges of up to 167 million gallons per day (mgd) with full tertiary treatment, and wet weather discharges of up to 271 mgd with full tertiary treatment. The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, does not involve industrial uses likely to substantially increase pollutant-loading levels in the sanitary sewer system. As discussed below in criterion (c), future demands from the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would not exceed the design or permitted capacity of the SJ/SCWPCP that serves the project site. Future water treatment demand was assessed in consultation with the City of Cupertino and includes consideration of development in the city through the 2040 buildout horizon of the General Plan.

CC 12-06-2022
406 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-47
As previously discussed in Section 4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed Modified Project would not exceed the capacity of stormwater drainage system that serves the project site. The proposed Modified Project would include 166,445 square feet of impervious surfaces, which is a decrease from existing conditions (209,783 square feet) and the Approved Project (209,450 square feet). The proposed Modified Project would provide pervious pavements, flow-through planters, and green roof that would provide stormwater treatment and reduce the amount of stormwater released into the City’s off-site storm drain infrastructure. Consequently, the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would not require the expansion of existing stormwater facilities or the construction of new facilities, the construction of which could otherwise have significant impacts.

Other utility facilities that serve the project site include electric power and telecommunications facilities.

PG&E would supply electricity infrastructure to the project site. Silicon Valley Clean Energy would provide electricity to the project site. AT&T and other providers would provide telephone service. The proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, consists of the demolition of existing commercial buildings and development of mixed-use project that would result in no change in land use intensity from what was evaluated in the General Plan EIR in a portion of the city that has access to existing infrastructure and services, which was accounted for in the General Plan EIR. The proposed Modified Project would include appropriate on-site infrastructure to connect to the existing PG&E and telecommunication systems and would not require new off-site facilities and distribution infrastructure or capacity enhancing alterations to any existing facilities.

Therefore, in summary, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to the construction of new utility service facilities.

Criteria b) and c). As shown in the General Plan EIR in Chapter 4.14, the water supply at Modified Project buildout year 2025 would be 14,055 acre feet per year (afy) and at General Plan buildout year 2040 would be 16,984 afy.86 As discussed in the General Plan EIR, buildout of the General Plan, which accounts for the development potential of the Approved Project, and proposed Modified Project, would not result in insufficient water supplies from Cal Water under normal year conditions or during single-dry year and multiple-dry years, with the proposed and existing water conservation regulations and measures in place.

Furthermore, as shown in Table 4-1, Water Demand Comparison for the Approved and Modified Projects, applying the same water demand rates as the Adopted MND for comparison, the proposed Modified Project would have less water demand than the Approved Project. 86 One acre-foot equals about 326,000 gallons, or enough water to cover an acre of land, about the size of a football field, one foot deep.

CC 12-06-2022
407 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Table 4-1 Water Demand Comparison for the Approved and Modified Projects Approved Project Modified Project
Development
Type
Water Demand
Generation Factor Size
Water
Demand Size
Water
Demand
Residential 137.2 gpd/unit 188 units 25,793 gpd 206 units 28,263 gpd Hotel 0.50 gpd/sf 52,762 26,381 gpd 0 0
Restaurant a 1.10 gpd/sf 17,864 sf 19,650 gpd 32,321 sf 35,553 gpd Retail b 0.11 gpd/sf 4,729 sf 520 gpd 8,592 sf 945 gpd
Total Water Demand 72,344 gpd or

81.03 afy 64,761 gpd or 72.5 afy
Notes: square foot or feet = sf; gallons per day = gpd; acre feet per year = afy a. Restaurant = about 79% of total commercial use
b. Retail = about 21% of total commercial use
Source: Water Supply Evaluation (Yarne & Associates), May 20, 2014; prepared with input from the City of Cupertino.

Furthermore, the project applicant of the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, which includes Utilities and Service Systems Permit Requirements to ensure adequate water supply and infrastructure. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to water supply.

As described in criterion a), while there is physical capacity to accommodate the wastewater discharge of the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, the construction and operation of the proposed Modified project could exceed the 13.8 mgd “contractual” limit through the City of Santa Clara. The contractual agreement between CSD and the City of Santa Clara, for this portion of the Santa Clara sewer system, allows the City 13.8 mgd of capacity in the sewer system during peak wet weather flows. The existing CSD peak wet weather flow into the Santa Clara system is 13.14 mgd.87 However, the estimated wastewater generation from the proposed Modified Project and from other potential projects in Cupertino, as established by the General Plan, is approximately 14.61 mgd, which is the total capacity needed to serve the General Plan buildout.88 Therefore, the proposed project, and other approved and potential projects as established by the General Plan buildout, will require a reduction in sewer generation from the CSD system prior to flowing into the City of Santa Clara system, or additional capacity rights will need to be acquired from the City of Santa Clara. The project applicant of the Modified Project would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 17.04, Standard Environmental Protection Requirements, which 87 Mark Thomas & Co. Inc, December 6, 2019, Cupertino Sanitary District Flow Modeling Analysis Homestead Flume Outfall to City of Santa Clara.
88 Mark Thomas & Co. Inc, December 6, 2019, Cupertino Sanitary District Flow Modeling Analysis Homestead Flume Outfall to City of Santa Clara.

CC 12-06-2022
408 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-49
includes Utilities and Service Systems Permit Requirements in Section 17.04.050(I) to manage wastewater inflow and infiltration to sewer system. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to wastewater treatment provider capacity.

Criteria d) and e). The City contracts with Recology to provide solid waste collection services to residents and businesses in the city. The City has a contract with Newby Island Sanitary Landfill until 2023. In addition to the Newby Island Landfill, solid waste generated in Cupertino can also be disposed of at the Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery facility, the Corinda Los Trancos Landfill, Forward Landfill Inc., Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill, Kirby Canyon Recycling and Disposal Facility, the Monterey Peninsula Landfill, Recology Hay Road, the Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill, the Zanker Material Processing Facility, and the Zanker Road Class III Landfill.

The proposed waste management for the proposed project would include the management of waste, recycling, and composting. Solid waste generated by construction of the proposed project would largely consist of demolition waste from the existing buildings as well as construction debris. The proposed Modified Project, same as the Approved Project, would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste, and the City’s Zero Waste Policy, which requires the recycling or diversion at least 65 percent of all generated construction and demolition (C&D) waste by salvage or by transfer to an approved facility. Prior to the permit issuance, the applicant for the proposed Modified Project would be required to submit a properly completed Waste Management Plan, which includes the estimated maximum amount of C&D waste that can feasibly be diverted, which facility would handle the waste, and the total amount of C&D waste that would be landfilled. Compliance with CMC Chapter 16.72 and the City’s Zero Waste Policy would reduce solid waste and construction-related impacts on the landfill capacity.

The City’s per capita disposal rate for residents and employees in 2019 was 3.5 PPD and in 2020 was 2.6 PPD, respectively, which is below the 4.3 PPD and 8.1 PPD target rate established by CalRecycle.89 Applying these disposal rates, the proposed Modified Project would generate approximately 2,3062,308 PPD or

1.531.2 tons per day (TPD) of new waste.90 Therefore, like the Approved Project, the Modified Project solid waste generation would be well within the Newby Island Sanitary Landfill permitted daily disposal capacity of 4,000 TPD. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to solid waste. 89 CalRecycle, 2019 and 2020. Jurisdiction Diversion/Disposal Rate Summary, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DiversionProgram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2006, accessed August 5,2022. Note, the years reflect the most recent published data.
90 (3.5 x 591 residents = 2,069 PPD) + (2.6 PPD x 9192 employees = 237239 PPD) = 2,305.62,308 PPD or 1.531.2 TPD CC 12-06-2022
409 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

WILDFIRE
If located in or near State
responsibility areas or lands classified
as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the proposed project:

Level of
Impact in
the 2016
MND
Environmental Effects of the Modified Project
Same or
Reduced
Impact ?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving
New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that
may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including
downslope or downstream flooding
or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or
drainage changes?
Post 2016
CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Adopted MND
While these standards regarding wildfire related impacts were adopted by the California Natural Resource Agency in December 2018 after the time of the Adopted MND, Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Adopted MND, addressed the wildfire impacts associated with the Approved Project.

Wildfire impacts were found to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the Adopted MND
No mitigation measures were required as part of the Adopted MND.

CC 12-06-2022
410 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
November 2022 Page 4-51
Discussion
As described in Section 4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, under criterion (g), the project site is located within a CAL FIRE designated LRA and outside of VHFHSZ. The project site is not near lands designated as an SRA by CAL FIRE. The project site is approximately 2 miles northeast from the nearest VHFHSZ or land designated by CAL FIRE as a SRA. The project site is not located within the Cupertino or CAL FIRE designated WUI.91 Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the impacts identified in the Approved MND related to wildfires. 91 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2018. Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Threat. http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d45bf08448354073a26675776f2d09cb, accessed August 5, 2022; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. “FHSZ Viewer.” https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed August 5, 2022; City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Chapter 16.74. Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area; City of Cupertino. 2015. General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040, Health and Safety Chapter, Figure HS-1.

CC 12-06-2022
411 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

This page intentionally left blank.

CC 12-06-2022
412 of 759
November 2022 Page 5-1
Conclusion
As summarized below, and for the reasons described in Chapter 4, Environmental Analysis, of this Addendum, the City of Cupertino has concluded that the proposed Modified Project would not result in any new significant impacts not previously identified in the Adopted MND; nor would it result in a substantial increase in the severity of any significant environmental impact previously identified in the Adopted MND. For these reasons, a subsequent EIR is not required, and an Addendum to the Adopted MND is the appropriate CEQA document to address the proposed Modified Project.

SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT
The proposed changes to the Approved Project include the mix of land use for the future development of the project site and are not a substantial change to the Approved Project analyzed in the Adopted MND.

The proposed Modified Project is within the same project site parameter and would use the same egress/ingress access points. The proposed Modified Project would result in 18 additional residential units and 50 additional residents, and an increase of 2728 employees, and would not include the proposed hotel. The proposed maximum height of each of the three buildings under the Approved Project and the Modified Project are roughly the same and would include minimal increases under the Modified Project to Building A and C (10 feet and 3 feet taller at the tallest architectural feature), respectively. Building A under the Modified Project would be reduce by 5 feet at the tallest architectural feature. Otherwise, under both scenarios the three buildings are in the 4 to 5 story range. See Table 1-1, General Plan EIR and Project Comparisons. Consequently, there are no substantial changes proposed to the Approved Project that will require major revisions of the previous Adopted MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
As described in Chapter 5, Environmental Analysis, of this Addendum, the proposed Modified Project would not result in new significant environmental impacts beyond those identified in the Adopted MND, would not substantially increase the severity of significant environmental effects identified in the Adopted MND, and thus would not require major revisions to the Adopted MND. The proposed Modified Project, therefore, is not substantial and does not require major revisions to the Adopted MND or a subsequent MND. In addition, the physical conditions within the area of the project site or the project site itself have not changed substantially since the time of the Adopted MND.

CC 12-06-2022
413 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

CONCLUSION

NEW INFORMATION
No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the Adopted MND, has been identified which shows that the proposed Modified Project would be expected to result in: 1) new significant environmental effects not identified in the Adopted MND; 2) substantially more severe environmental effects than shown in the Adopted MND; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously determined to be infeasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project sponsor declines to adopt the mitigation or alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those identified in the Adopted MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project sponsor declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

CC 12-06-2022
414 of 759
November 2022 Page 6-1
List of Preparers
City of Cupertino
Benjamin Fu .........................................................................................Director of Community Development Luke Connolly ............................................................................Acting Director of Community Development Piu Ghosh ........................................................................................................................... Planning Manager Gian Martire ................................................................................................. Senior Planner, Project Manager David Stillman............................................................................................................Transportation Manager Chris Carrao...................................................................................... Senior Transit & Transportation Planner Jennifer Chu.....................................................................................................................Senior Civil Engineer PlaceWorks
Terri McCracken................................................................................. Associate Principal, Principal-in-Charge Jacqueline Protsman Rohr.................................................................................Associate II, Project Manager Vivian Kha ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Project Planner Nicole Vermilion .................................................. Principal, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Practice Leader Steve Bush.............................................................................................................................. Senior Engineer Kristie Nguyen ............................................................. Associate, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Specialist Emily Parks ............................................Project Planner, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Specialist Alejandro Garcia....................................................................................... Senior Associate I, Noise Specialist Grant Reddy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Graphics Specialist CC 12-06-2022
415 of 759
MARINA PLAZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ADDENDUM NO. 1

CITY OF CUPERTINO

LIST OF PREPARERS

This page intentionally left blank.

CC 12-06-2022
416 of 759
Bay Pacific Properties, LLC
October 10, 2022
Sent Via Email to [email protected]
Gian Paolo Martire
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Application for new Mixed-Use Development at Marina Plaza Shopping Center located at 10118- 10122 Bandley Drive, and 10145 North DeAnza Boulevard, Cupertino CA 95014 (the “Project”).

Property Owners: Marina Plaza, LLC and Cupertino 10145 LLC (“Owners”) Assessor Parcel Number: 326-34-043 & 326-34-066
Applicant: Larry Wang, Tectonic Builders, Corp. (“Applicant”) Development Permit DP-2022-001
Summary of Community Outreach/Contacts for the Project
Dear Gian:

Attached please find the summaries of the public outreach/community contacts completed through October 8, 2022, for the Project. I have included an Index of the Contacts/Outreach as well as the supporting backup (email exchanges, mailing list, community notice flyers, signup sheets and comments cards from the community meetings). This document (letter and backup) has also been uploaded into projectdox.

In Summary we completed four community meetings with
• Two Mailings sent U.S. Postal Service – First Class Mail • Invitations to all residents and businesses within 2,000 feet of Marina Plaza o Total Invitations Sent 2,041
o Attendees 58
o Comment Cards Received 5
In addition, we had meetings with the representatives from the Cupertino Sister City groups to explore how we can work in partnership with them on various art elements for the project. All communications and other community interest is included in the summaries as well.

Gian, please call if you have any questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,
/s/
Greg Endom
cc: DeAnza Venture, LLC, via email
Erik Ramakrishnan, Berliner Cohen, via email
Amy Chan, via email
Uploaded into project.dox
CC 12-06-2022
417 of 759
Marina Plaza Re-Development
Index to Community Outreach/Meeting Summaries
The following summaries memorialize the general outreach activities initiated by the Applicant to inform the community of the planned redevelopment of Marina Plaza. They do not include one on one meetings that have occurred between City Staff, affiliated City departments (Santa Clara County Fire or Sanitary Departments) or other appointed or elected officials.

DATE ACTION TAB
January 7, 2022 Meeting with Sister City Representatives 1 March 11, 2022 Mailing to 1,032 residents/business upcoming community meeting 4/2 & 4/13 2 March 16, 2022 Invitations returned from March 11, 2022, initial mailing 3 March 16, 2022 Personal Invitations to adjacent property owners’ community meeting 4/2 & 4/13 4 March 16, 2022 Request from neighbor for ongoing updates 5 March 17, 2022 Personal delivery to adjacent property owners, meeting invite 4/2 & 4/13 6 March 24, 2022 Personal delivery to adjacent property owner, meeting invite 4/2 & 4/13 7 April 2, 2022 Summary of In-person Community meeting, sign-up sheet and comment cards 8 April 13, 2022 Summary of In-person Community meeting, sign-up sheet and comment cards 9 Photos of Community Meeting Activities-April 2 and April 13, 2022 9 (a) September 9, 2022 Personal delivery to adjacent property owners, meeting invite 10/5 & 10/8 10 September 16, 2022 Mailing to 986 residents/business upcoming community meeting 10/5 & 10/8 11 CC 12-06-2022
418 of 759

Index to Community Outreach/Meeting Summaries
September 16, 2022 Personal delivery to adjacent property owners, meeting invite 10/5 & 10/8 12 September 19, 2022 Email invitation to Sister City representatives of upcoming meetings 10/5 & 10/8 13 September 21, 2022 Follow-up request Email Invitation to neighbor of upcoming meetings 10/5 & 10/8 14 September 29, 2022 Email Invitation to adjoining neighbor, Apple, Inc. 15 September 30, 2022 Mailing Pieces returned from September 16, 2022 Mailing to nearby property owners 16 October 5, 2022 Summary of In-person Community meeting, sign-up sheet and comment cards 17 October 8, 2022 Summary of In-person Community meeting, sign-up sheet and comment cards 18 October 8, 2022 Email interchange with local resident; Michelle Vinh, no comments received 19 CC 12-06-2022
419 of 759
\
-so
--aJo!oNo
voI
I
o
o
-o
E
3o
JC+
-l o(') t-to
=-ac)
@
=. o- -
o-tvt
r')o
-p
I
oo
-o
E
3 o
J-t-l!o
--J
-a1+ttaa
U!
I
N) N)O
N)
I O
Ots
f1o
3 vt3 Cg I=
--.3€3.9 OL vtq
ooc)
J-
-{o)
q
+t
H
E
E
--aCI
o)
5 tao
CC 12-06-2022
420 of 759
8B
=o) a -:.
==co,=.! €s
ooid
frFt<tqco=!t==dq
{ .rt
{qFFF Et-*=(D(D c|OJ.TFJ' €'19.fr'fr' E>aFlrF
frgEs
firrEtigtFs?:fl3 , = i r + F I i $ E I i s
s iu$E;Bllsi*;r# i i E + 4
f, f 6 a 3*l
s
r
EEiliEti[$FFg a
€ = =i g. s I €<
I
a 33
r F EFA f ss
r
d oo
q CL{r{rJ
F EF ?. i il; b'=P i iq
=
s.d -.(, q d* E ;.H Lr.+= 3<
s E;
"*f;3 q ='3. c)T'= =cL
E ng E6- .A
o, f.o
J
o
J
CC 12-06-2022
421 of 759

CU PERTINO SISTER CITY REPRESENTATIVES
Meeting for Marina Plaza Redevelopment - fanuary 7 ,2O22

NAME (PRINT) PHONE (CELL)
M Al)tg lo,A+ I8-u0a &na<8"o 5loitoXLb
Atr *rJ,krrs
EMAIL
t,lpnir+LDrqYhily.(M

RESENTING - TITLE
lndls gt\"s,qN bsro*(le)
lnol,r "Cw9
4u^J-ar\-
U\u-,r&r*
a, ?nq,j"-/-L
lst*Orne> Troepzoe<tz
9;s/r, fre<,/n-t
REP
. o-\
/POStTtON
1 2
3 4
5 67
8 9
tu
rrAN Ew s
Chiq ' sfin ct Lin
O,ufiA^dhe^
r\olrne, ?nl,o 6;//a-/ uo! Qa vu ? / fr ?/f - 00i/ j/Iei:rn7 a5aa./. /o-1 rcLl nk[e W
?
101112131415
CC 12-06-2022
422 of 759
-s
o
--aJo!o-No
n
oI
I
o
o
-o
E
3o
J-t+
EE
--ac)
o
J-r+
aa
-{o
o.+o
J6'
w
=. o- -
o-l (n
Oo-t E
I
oo
-o
E
3 o
JC+
E
o
-
3-aC+
+F
aa
UT'
I
N) N)
o
N)
Io
ots
11 o
33 cI
J
-ar+og1+
-o
0,
CI
J-
tn
g3
3 o
--aoln
-l (I)
u
+F
N)
CC 12-06-2022
423 of 759
3== oo
o qoo JF}?}
IJ--
-- r- otl ctQ g!9 (')PB 9!{!? .+
0) et :t
!(1{ E99 4.-AO el0, €'s< O*-ol 5r= i +fr' 8Boga/l-
?|
I1A6
gt(oJ.+o
(
= oNm
f roN:gd. HiF JF'- 6 ' oE E> CL 6-3 Or-h= TJ.+ O,
g d=-
-artJ 6 q-s. I rrd
f;q-L.+q
-.Y i3o=' g6Iqo=.it J tsc o5
H3
=f egoPdJvt So9; :T'
-:i
t1
N
€ne Orr
a. !,
J
o
g<
=o==c0,
qs=.!
oo, i?gF5<I^g co5E=3dq
f, g E E:3
I
F i* FBc :
: = k.e< a-6'orcioN O .'t -i
A b.ba?] ts sE;
3 i^
9 ='
o3 +H d' S 2;3'
=!
- ot
- I o, =-''+-
A
v, +o ;5E
g
3 eF 3
se.!l q,oo,
CL
CC 12-06-2022
424 of 759
3 ^
B
F
o b'n
V E ex
= a H33 i 3 E=:E i
IFISi
Iiilg i 'iE
E € ad i; E-ifl
:r -l
o
!'o
--.Log
oo
-J--aa!,a+
I'
o
3 !
6' g7HE^Gl
F;
g
liA
lon=6O
t *i iE:F€.8 Ee
B :' .D a o.o p.3 gfi
I
0 o
t
Al
!!
tG
c
c
F
o
Joct.Do
E
g EF
$ or oE I O i
r I 6-6-d tD fi.
eAgiiEigSF€; qE
ig*€ ggee€i iF- 3F E!;r€,aE**+ g€ 8g ie' : 9re
=
n o,
= :a-iorl--l5N
=
-E i !, -=-NO e6gN
o
t
Ga
a
o
I
ti
ll
!
a
*
h
958 ;s> :Ni=os -o3<
>9=o:--'!(,'-
o
o
oo@ar9) C'o
CC 12-06-2022
425 of 759
2000 Mailing LinAp Veetings.xlsx
TORRE
95014
s
95014 Lr.c 10311 CUPERTINO CA
STEVENS CR LtC 20279 CUPERTINO CA
tNc AHK BLVD 1.A CUPERNNO or
TC BUITDING ot s DE ANZA BtVD

AND LAU GTORIA WAI BIG TRU STEVENSCREEK
OF ABUNDANT LIFE 10100 N ca 95014
RAFINASRIN STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1115

TOWN CENTER LN
TAN AILI 20896 ELENDA
& AHUJA MALIKAJAY 20498
95014
PUNDLE IYER VIDYATRUSTEE cA 95014
YU.LI & SINEY HUAGU YU.LI AND SINEY HUA TN 269 CUPERTINO cA 95014 A HOFFMAN ATBERTA DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
ALEERT C ET AL DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 of
H CHIANG ALg( H PL CUPERTINO CA 9S014 or
10253 MINER PL ot
SRIAN L 10159 LN
&ATSUKO MATSUKI AND ATSUKO TRUSTEE
ALFRED I 0r CUPERTINO CA 95014
LOPEZALISON M PL CUPERTINO CA 95014 or
IAU REBECCA TRUSTEE 20735 CREEK BtVD CUPERTINO ot
KAI.IANG YU
& PMDNYA & PRADNYA ALOK

TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY ILC
or
& AND GARG PARUL
or PADUKONEAMIT
SEN ANANDAMOY qa
or KRUZMAN 95014
& CAROLINE VER I.IMARGA 6a CREEK 2109 CUPERTINO cA 95014 & JOY T LIN 20488 CREE( BLVD 7209 CUPERTINO CA 95014
or ANDREW AND NEMOTO ATSUKO
WU ANDREW ETAL or
ol
CHAI 95014
WAH.YIN & AND HENRY CHAN TRUSTEE 2071o ]GARDEN GATE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014

ANITACTRUSTEE

SAGDEO ANJALI AND VIVEK

JAIN ANKUR S AND SHILPI

SREEHARSHA KARICHERTA
ANOOP & RUCHITA SINGHAI. or Neichbor
CHATITATRUST 7M7S DR

BETA BHATT
& YOSHTKO
J
Ai.ITONIA YEN C1IANG or Neirhbot CHANG ANTONIA Y€N JOSEPH clR 20233 CUPERTINO CA 95014 2235 {NURAG & SWAII GARG or Neirhbor GARG ANURAG AND SWATI TRUSTEE 10165 ]BONNY DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 2903APPLE COMPUTER INC or Neirhbor APPLE COMPUTER INCqPPlE INC i orNeichbor Aoole lnc- losoo cra 9s014 2033 APRILWAH YING CHEUNG 6r N.irhb6. CIIPFRTINO a 9501d 22t1 qPURVA MEHTA MEHTA APURVA TRUSTEE & ETAL 20804 GATE DR cA 95014 1808

VALLI TRUSTEE LN
or CREE( 2110

CACTCA DEY ARKA'IT ETAI

EASH ARIE TRUSTEE & ET AL
AR RM TRUSTEE & ET AL 10168
101152(Ma8

CUPERTINO
CUPER

CUPERTINO
NNO
950149501495014 BLVD

CC 12-06-2022
426 of 759
2000 MailinS list Apr reetings.xlsx
faclltles
& DELPHINE M PERRIER OT PERRIER SWAN
95014
P
& HUYNH

P AND RAMOLAA
or
202a1 95014 PY CUPERTINO CA

BATARAMAN
ot CREEK ELVD 1318 CUPERNNO
ot SHELLY

P AND ANUMDHA
& AGARWAL SHITPI ASHUTOSH AND 20818 95014
& EDWARD I AUDREY 20420 CUPERTINO CA 95014 or
ZACKRIAH 8wD 2273 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 or
or RA TRUSTEE ETENDA DR 20a32 CUPERTINO CA 95014 18014
EANDIEY CENIER INC or Neirhbor BANDLEY DR
BAOSHENG & QING tIU or Neishbor tIU MOSHENG AND QING 20889 I.IANFORD DR CUPERTINO .I qsot! 19)? A MERRILT MERRItt EARMRAA
ETAL
APARTMENTS.CHD LLC DR
of
of
CACA
2083320745

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
9501495014
l( & ANGETA H
c ( cHoY CHOY LOUISA LTRUSTEE
CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2924 DR
tN

HUI BEN K AND ANGETA H
BEN K
SHETLY
MACADAM 10160
20805
&VIOI.A U CHOUPAK

J TPWANG
& SOLORIO.ELLIS AND SOtORtO-EtLtS CHRTS

U TRUSTEE
T P TRUSTEE & ET At
B€RNARD ANYU AND WANG CECITIA TR r7!2 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 or HOGUE cr CUPERTINO cA 95014 0r
,YUAN GATE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 oa
SHANKAR 20595 SUNRISE DR CUPERTINO ca 95014
TRUSTEE 10281
gIAtIK MIRIAM TRUSTEE
3HASKAR &AUIENA CHAUDHURI or Neighbor SIALIKARIEIJTRUSTEE orNeighbor 3lN & WU JANETWONG orNeichbor 8IN AND WU JANET
'INGWU
& WU HONGWEI II or Neirhbor BINGWU AND WU HONGWEI
BINGXIONG or
of CREEK SLVD 1101 CUPERTINO CA 95014
20677 CRAIG cr CUPERTINO CA 95014
& EMILY YANG 20699 RODRIGUES AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014
8&LUCYHCHU 20488 STEVENSCREEK ELVD 2305 CUPERINO CA 95014 or WONG BRADLEY ETAL
C & CHANG WENDY I.AM PARLETT
A DIMAMBRO 20255 cr CUPERNNO CA 95014
L& TRUSIEE 20488 STEVENSCREEK SLVD 1674 CUPERnNO CA 95014 or BRUCE LTRUSTEE & ET AL TRUSTEE
0r BUMK HAMDI AND ALIEVA DINARA
or PROPERTIES

WATER SERVICE CO

CHIN CHUN CHEN
& YEE CYNTHIA TRAN 2M74 HANFORD DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
& ETAL JOSEPH ctR 20142 CUPERTINO CA 95014
STEVENS CREEK TRUSTEE 20149 SLVD 95014 CUPERTINO CA
oroa
PROPERTIES CALIFORNIA LtC 20332 PKWY 95014 PY CUPERNNO CA CAROLJTRUSTEE&ET CA 95014
ol CAROLINE A 95014 PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA
J GEE
YYANG

CATHERINE CHI &JEFFREY L KOO
CATHY L HELGERSON )n6e7 6. Neichb6r HETGERSON CATHY t DIINCAR DR

CC 12-06-2022
427 of 759
\_--
2000 MailinS List Apri {eetings.xlsx
and
MICHAEL 10163 95014
&TEO KIMCHOOTAN TAN CHADE-MENG 20847 95014 CUPERNNO CA
DHARMA DUNNA WAY 95014 CUPERNNO CA
CREEK BLVD 1613
CHANG (EUN &JUNG SOO( KIM or Neichbor AND JUNG SOOK TRUSTEE FOREST AVE CUPERTINO I.INWEY
WU
LIN AND 20488
of
AND XU JIN TRUSTEE LN CUPERTINO CA 95014
AND HSIU-IINGTRUSTEE DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014
& XU JIN ZHENG
& HSIU.LING LIANG
LIU CHAO-YUE TRUSIEE & €TAI- CREEI( BI.VD 72L7 CUPERTINO CI CHARIES & 5U TING.TINGTSAI i orNeirhbor CHARLES to773
tol7l

TRUSTEE
L&
CARY
CHIEN
oa
L AND BETTY L TRUSTEE DR CUPERNNO CA 95014
DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
:HARTES S CONNIE C WATERS or Neiehbor 20n7 .SHEtLY DR CUPERTINO CA 95014:HARTEST KUNG or Naichbdr GUERRA LISA M TRUSTEE 20489 :HAROEN & wlNNIETSENG KOSOLCHAROEN 6r Naishbor 10281 WESTACRES DR CUPERTTNO Ci 95014 :HARU PATHAI( CHARU TRUSTEE 20846

CHARUI VIMAL TRUSTEE
or
CHE.CHENG AND SUN TE{HING TRUSTEE

CHEN AND CHEN
or
& CHEN YI.IING SHIH 20488 CREEK ELVD 1510 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 DIANE UYEHARA STEVENS CREEK 20483 SLVD 21L2 CUPERTINO CA 95014 R R 20292 PINNTAGE PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 95014
CHI CHIU or Neirhbor CHIU CHI 20851 FARGO OR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 1805 0foa

ARIMURA
CHUNG
CHIA.HSIANG AND WU JIH<HUN TRUSTEE
10164 LN CUPERT|NO CA 95014
CHIEN I.ISIN CHOW :HOW CHIEN HSIN TRUSTEE .STEVENS CREEK 20488 BLVD 2209 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2247 STEVENS CREE( SETIY 20d'AA BLVO 2202 CUPERNNO CA
CA
9S0149S014 CHIH CHEN

CHIH-HUNG
CHI.LIANG & LI.HWA WANG or Nei.hbor WANG CHI-LIANG AND II.IIWATRUSTEE 101a2 'PARI ETT PL CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2204 CHIIIN & WEI OIANHUA HSU or Neiehbor HSU CHITIN AND WEI OIANHUA 10067 BIANCHI CUPERNNO CA 95014 a2o/|

S LEUNG

V & (ANYAKUMARI CHUNDURU
IN
SUNG AND tEE KUEI CHIN ETAL KUO ANNIE FURAY 1027L DR
CHING.CHEN tIN or Neirhbor tIN CHING{HEN iSTEVENS CREEK 20940 BLVO CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2770 CHING-FU & YING.LING LAN or Neishbor cA 95014
CHINN CHIN or Neichbor :HIN CHINN TRUSTEE & ETATCHINWUN tIN or Nehhbo. ETAT 206/-L CHIO LEONG & KO JING HOI or Neirhbor IOI CHIO LEONG AND KO JING TRUSTEE 20638 ]SHELLY DR CUPERTTNO CA 95074. 2924 CHIUNG.YING AND YITON T 208/,6 DR
LN 198
BLVD 1401
CACACA

GARDEN GATE

TOWN CENTER

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO
95014
95014
& YITON T YAN
M
ROEr-S
ICHAELAI.BINI
CHUAN YAO & KAM SHARON CHENG o. Neiphbor CHEN6 CHUAN YAO AND KAM SHARON 20€8a CUPERTINO CA 95014 CHUNFENG HAO or Neichbor {AO C14UNFENG YAO XIANG 20775 rscoFtEtD DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2922CHUN6H&SEI.WENLIAO or Neirhbor IIAO CHUNG H AND BEI-WEN TRUSTEE 10eo2 CUPERTINO CA 95014 PY
CUPERTINO 9S014
CACA
95014
CI{UNIAN tI 6r Neichbdr II CHUNUN 20443 95014 CUPERTINO CA CHUN.SHENG & YIN JING YANG or Neiehbo. YANG CHUN.SHENG AND YIN JING 20640 22e7 CINDY MIN CHIN LEE or Neiihbor LEE CINDY MIN CHIN CREEK ELVO 20488 CLEMENT G & RESECCA YUK.TIN LEW or Neirhbor LEW CLEMENTG AND REBECCAYUK-TIN TRUSTEE VISTA ct 20254 L CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2222 ?t?q STIFTON STONG or Neilhbor TONG CLIFTON STRUSTEE 20294 PINTAGE CUPERTINO CA 95014

CC 12-06-2022
428 of 759
2000 MailinS List Apr ,eetings.xlsx
and
LCARNEY or SLVD
'417 JOHN OT CREEK SLVD
20380
& SARAH or 2@24 CUPERIINO cA 95014 1804
il of CUPERTINO cA 95014 2299
HOUSING DISAEI.ED HOUSING DISABLED INC EIANCHI CUPERTINO C.A

HOTELOWNER BLVD S DEANZA
or CUPERNNO 10460
cA 95014 oa
GROUP I.LC tLc 208 CUPERTTNO CA 95014
FUNG C'YNTHIA FARGO DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
J EOWMAN BOWMAN CYNIHIAJ 70273 MINER PL
20243 PINNTAGE PKWY
SHIH-LING 20658

P & DORIS COKEEFE DORIS CTRUSIEE
YANG DA.PING AND AUGUSNNA K Y or CUPERTINO cA 95014
or I.ANGEMAK MINER PL CUPERTINO CA
20320 tN 829 CUPERTINO CA ol
CHU CHU TONY 20186 HOGUE cr CUPERTINO CA
D&DENICEAKESTERSON TRUSlEE 70243

DAVIO DON AND IOK KAM TRUSTEE
or DAVID H ETALoa CA
ot CREEK t8t4 CUPERnNO CA 95014
KAHLEN 20720 RODRIGUES AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014tEE 20488 STEVENS CREEK BLVD L4O2 CUPERTINO CJ 95014P PRITZKAU TOWN CENTER 20s00 LN 293 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 PHELPS 20293 C.ARTWRIGHT CUPERTINO
or DAVID EING
CREEK
R
cuPtRTrNo cA 95014
orot

DAVID R AND HAN MEI

DAVID YI FANG SHENG

TGAUTHIER
DESORAH N KIM or Neirhbor KIM DEBOMH N 2(X88 STEVENS CREEK BLVD t6t2 CUpERT|NO CA 95014 2287 DEEPAK AND KRISHNAMURTHY GAYATRI 1019S BONNY DR CUPERTINO cA 95014 or DENNIS CAND HUANG AMANDA CTRUSTEE DR CUPERTINO ca 95014 DER YANG & FENNAH CGUAN or Nei.hbor GUAN DER YANG AND FENNAH CTRUSTEE 2oa8a STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1601 CUPERTTNO CrA 95014 2291 SUMONA KAEIRA' 6a

OEZHAO & XU JUE BAI
DI MA
DIANE AND LU CHEN SUN of LN 292 CUPERTTNO CA 95014
20206
20s00
FOREST

TOWN CENTER
or :LEW DIANE J TRUSTEE PL cupERTrNo cA 9s014
P WARKEI\mN or WARKENT!N P ctR CUPERTINO CA 95014
& BENAIFER DASTOOR PY
DONG KWON SHIN or Neirhbor

DONG WOOK &IANG MIJA KIM
DONGSHENG & zHANG CHUN ZHOU ZHANG CHUN 20809
DONNA L FANETN or Nehhbor DONNA L TOWN CENTER 20500
DOROTHY MARIE SLANCO or Neirhbor DOROTHY MARIE TRUSTEE 20571 SUNRISE DOUGIAS C & LISA IGII.LITAND DOUGI.ASC&LISAL ol TOWN CENTER 20s00 LN 95014 162 CUPERNNO CA BANDLEY DRIVE I.LC ot DR CUPERNNO CA 950'.4
cA 95014
95014

SCOTT & MATSUDA YUKIKO FREEMAN

YUEN & HIDAJATYANN WONG
PaSe 4 of 18
CC 12-06-2022
429 of 759
2000MailingListApr. rleetings.xlil

CUPERNNO CA
DYG REALTY INVESTMENT rtc AVE CUPERTINO CA
& PAUTASUTTON of DR
ot ESTHER STEVENS CREEK
or
K & BRIDGET KING KING EDWARD KAND 23rO CUPERTINO cA 95014 oa DR CUPERTINO cA 95014

EGON AND EVATRUSTEE MINER PL
C ROTIY REV ROTTY LO174 t CHEN ELAINE 20488 9s014 or
CUPERnNO Ci 95014 or
ETAt CUPERNNO CA 95014
IOANATAROPA IOANATRUSTEE TOWN CENTER tN 288 CUPERNNO ca 95014 ENDRY & HADIWISOWO ENDRY AND HADIWIBOWO AI.ICE GREENTEAF cr CUPERTINO CA GAGNI MACADAM LN or
20818 FARGO or
ot 10216 PARK
10495
20484

WANDERSON ERICW
DEVRIES ERIK AND CHEN I"ING CUPERTINO CA 95014 2203
MAK 10185 MACADAM LN CUPERTINO CA 95014
CHU 20498 STEVENS CREEK
D WOLF

FENG FANGXIAOYU
FARIDA
CA 9S014 ot
of GAO
tLc 0r RD CUPERTINO CA 95014
A & TAUTEN SATLY WADE 20598 scoFtEtD DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 N & GLORYYU PKWY PY CUPERTINO CI 95014
YUNGFU & LI SUCHIN LIANG 10108 RANDY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014YUNGFU LIANG TNUSTEE & $AT SUCHIN TRUSTEE 10201 s DE ANZA ELVD cupERTrNo ca 9s014 FU.HUA AND CHIANG CHIA-IING LYNN TRUST
S & MARYANN T DI VITTORIO ELVD oa
Avosf 10324 MINER PL CUPERTINO cA 95014
HUANG CRYSTAL TRUSIEE 20500 CENTER LN 295 CUPERTINO CA 95014 GANESH N AND ESWARI TRUSTEE 80NNY ca 9s014
sAso I
ororot

GARY E AND PATSY M TRUSTEE

CWALTERS
ARORA
SHIHCHING CI{IN
TRUSTEE & ETAI. ]YU XIAOMIN TRUSTEE

PINNTAGE

GEORGE DR

PKWY PY

CUPERTINO CA
203t2
20724
GEMLD AAND PARKER M or REINELL Pt- CUPERTTNO CA 95014 222t KEI-YEE & OANH WONG ot 10171 PARISII PL CUPERTINO Cj. 95014 22t6 SERALD R &IOSEPHINE F FORTES 76)lA WILt CT cuPERltNO CA 93014 2224 HSU NAI-TING AND CHIN-HSIAT' LO22A BEARDON DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 1935 3II,BERTCYU GILBERTCAND WANG VICKY H RANDY tN 1019t
SUVARNA TRUSTEE or GIRISH TRUSTEE & ETAL 20166 FOREST AVE CUPERNNO CA

GLIDESKY GROUP LLC
95014 & KARTHIKAYINI PANDIAN KARTHIKAYINI TRUS
158

HANFORD
orqr
AVE
DR

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
CACA
R CHIN ot 70243 BEARDON DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 7922
GOPAIBHAI D & PRANGNABEN G MOR orNeilhbor iMORGOPALBHAI DAND PRATIGNAAENG 10239 NILE DR CUPERiNO CA 95014 2145GORDONM&SHARONLLU o.Neirhbor ILUGORDON MANDSHARON LETAL LU DENISE T 204s1 SCOFIELD DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2922 20a./|7 GARDENGATE DR CUPERT|NO C 95014 1807

CC 12-06-2022
430 of 759
2000 Mailing list Apr ieetinSs.xlsx
llst -
Hsf
3MCE HYNES€ALVAN GRACE BrvD 2205
D & I.ILY MAHURIN SUNRISE DR or
TRUSTEE 10184
HUACII

AASUNCION

CUPERTINO
caCA CAI GUAN HUA
GREGORY F AND 20499
2o4aa
9S0149S014
& PL CUPERNNO CA
ET At CREEK ELVD 1509
u.c
or
LLC

LIU HAI FENG AND FENG XIAO
HAIDEH

PAR( CIRCLE EASTBARMRA FENG IIU

SHARIFI
1013810205
or 1102 CUPERTINO ct 95014
HAN CUPERTINO cA 95014
OKHUN TRUSTEE & ETAI. so CREEK BIVD 1802 CUPERTINO CA
& ZHANG KUN I.IU HANKAI AND ZHANG KUN DR
YAN YAN HAO 10165 or

SOUMYA H AGASTYA SOUMYA H TRUSTEE

C MUTTART MARIK DELORES ATRUSTEE
R& or HARSHA RAND HARSHA CUPERNNO CA 95014
ofol 10324 VISTA DR CUPERTINO ca 95014
ot
C PAO PAO DEBORAH Y TRUSTEE 20488 CREEK BwD 1315
M & ANNE ETAN 1009r
HERMANM&tIIENAM M AND LIL€NA M TRUSTEE
0f HERNANDO AND
or HIMANSHU AND VAISHALI TRUSTEE
of YONEZAWA PKWY PY CUPERTINO cA 95014
ot .STEVENS CREEK 8wD L407 CUPERTTNO CA 95014
YOON 2027a PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 95014
FAI SIU 2M88
& LI FEN

DAI HONGIIE
LI

HENRY YANG
& IIN XIAOWEN TAM 10290 WESTACRES DR CUPERNNO CA 95014
KH LIOU ELLEN WYTRUSTEE 10308 GTENCOE DR CUPERNNO CA 950'.4 AND WAN HSING 1M20 BEARDON DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
HU

LIN HOU
KUNG
HSIU YING PAI CRAIG 20657 cr CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2972
HSIU.CHUAN & CHAO.IIANG LIN i orNeirhbor tIN HSIU{HUAN AND CHAO-LIANG 20274 VISTA cr CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2222 or T TRUST DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 HSU TRACYTRUSTEE
CHOU HSU.HUNG AND
& ZHOU XINIAN TIAN
CHEN
HUNG CHI & CHOK (IOW I.AI or Neichbor TAI HUNG CHI AND CHOI( KIOWTRUSTEE CUPERYINO 10770 BONNY DR cA 9SO14 2906 HUY N VU 6r Neirhb6r CA 9SO14 7477 VU HUY N TRUSTEE 20969 ATVES DR CUPERTINO L HYUN CHO q5014 cn ))e1 CHO IL HYUN STEVENS CREEK 20488 EIVD 1603 CUPERTINONDRANIL & AGRAWALSONALI SEN or Neirhbor SEN INDMNILAND AGRAWAL SONALI TRUSTEE CUPERTINO 10158 .MNDY LN cA 95014 23/3 NGRID EAYNE CUPERTINO 20243 .CARTWRIGHT or Neirhbor EAYNE INGRIDTRUSTEE cA 95014 2227 NHYANG PARK or NeiEhbor PARK INHYANG AND KIM EUN HYE CUPERTINO 10203 PARISH PL cA 95014 2205

IRENE M

KIT& SINING YOUNG CHAN
203t4 :PINNTAGE PKWY
cHow LN
olol
PY
180
CACA

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
950149S014
IACOUEI.INE LJACKSON CUPERTINO 20644 SHELLY DR or Neiehbor IJACKSON -IACOUEIINE LTRUSTEE cA 95014 2924

CC 12-06-2022
431 of 759
2000 MailinS List Ap! ,Veetings.xlsx
OWNERNAME s STATE S ZtP S 2tp4
JAMESCHING.I ETAt
KHAN
A& DR
UN 20488 95014
orof

KARYN M TRUSTEE

M )SCOFIELD

SCOFIELD

I CHUN YU
PARK HAE.JUNG ETIZABE
\0207

LIVINGSTON
orot
CICACA
LN
PI
LN

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
9501495014

R TAPLEY
or T
JAMES RTRUSTEE 10193
20374
KYUNG SOOK CUPERNNO CA 95014
CHEN TRUSTEE & ET AL BLVD 2308 CUPERTINO CA 95014
J WANG WANG JASON J AND CHIU FENG MEI DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 JEAN{I-AUDE ROY 6r Neichb6rJEFFN&YIH.NANYANG or Neirhbor YANGJEFF N AND YIH.NAN TRUSTEE & ETAL 10160 BEARDON DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 1930

JESSICA TRUSTEE
OI L4L6
WAY
WAN.CHYUNG

CACACACACA
DRDR
PL

WU JEFFREYJ
to

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
95014950149501495014
2287222722231e79

CARTWRIGHT
VISTA
.GARDEN GATE

PARLETT
101442077570262

HILARY SNYDER
WEIA
IESSICA Y RAO q. NeiEhbor RAO JESSICA Y ET AL ICHANGPAULCANDCHING.LI 2O48A STEVENS CREEK BIVD a276 CUPERNNO CA 95014 2247 wEUESSTCA

LYN IIA WAN
& CHOU NEN.NEN IEE 10154 MINER Pt CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2202 or Neirhbor WANG JIAMING AND WU YUN TRUSTEE 20819 HANFORD DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 1823 IIAN&WUXIANGTANG r orNeithbor TANGJIANANDWUXIANG 20818 GARDENGATE DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 1808 IIANHONGZHONG I orNeighbor ZHONGJIANHONGANDHSUAMYJO-UNGTRUSIEE 10170 MACADAM fN CUPERnNO CA 95014 2175 IIANWANG orNeighbor WANGJIAN LUXIAOLI lO28O WESTACRES DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 2937 IIANDONG & SUI HAO YU or Neighbor YU JIANDONG AND SUI HAO 2O5OO TOWN CENTER tN 289 CUPERTINO CA 95014 3255 IIANFENGWU orNeighbor WUJIANFENG JIANG Ll 20725 SCOFIELD DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 2945IIANG & YAO tlN ZHU or Nei8hbor ZHU JIANG AND YAO LIN 20277 PINNTAGE PKWY PY CUPERnNO CA 95014 2134 IIANINGTAN orNeiEhbor TANJIANINGTRUSTEE 20537 CRAIG Cr CUPERIINO CA 95014 2972 IIGNESH & GHIYAVAISHALI JOSHI 20913 ALVES DR oT Neilhbor JOSHI JIGNESH AND GHIYAVAISHALI CUPERT|NO CA 95014 7477IIIN & CHENG.PO IAI or Neiqhbor tAl JllN AND CHENG-PO TRUSIEE 20510 RODRIGUES AVE CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2955 IIMMYCHENG CHUAN NIU or Neirhbor NIU JIMMYCI{ENG CI{UAN AND NANC'I HSUCH Cl{lNG 20650 PARK CIRCLE WEST CUPERINO CA 95014

SHYONG JAN
oa XUEJINGHAI AND WANG HAIYAN 10280 PARK GREEN IN 828 CUPERTINO CA 95014 & HUANG HUAN CAO ql CAOJINGPING AND HUANG HUAN NILE DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 2745 & NIKETAVAGHETA oa PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 95014 2735
LEE
IOANNE T PRESTON or Neirhbo. PR€SrON JOANNE T TRUSTEE iMINER 70323 PL CUPERTINO CA 95014 2OL2 IOANYC &JAMESJ CHEN orNeiqhbor CHENJOANYCANDJAMESJ ETAI CHEN PHITIP :STEVENS CREEK 20488 BLVD 7rL7 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2287 MICHAEL &JOEI.LE BARRON WOIF OR CUPERTINO
ororor

NETSON JOELAND ANN TRUSTEE & ETAL
JOEI D
1015110201
EONNY
iscoFtEtD
IOHN & WATSH KELTYGI{ASHGHAI o. Neichbor GHASHGHAI IOHN AND WATSH KELTYTRUSTEE 102a9 NILE DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2745 IOHN C I( & KIN HSIEH or Neichbor HSIEHIOHN C K AND KIN 20444 STEVENS CREEI( BTVD 7220 CUPERTINO cA 95014 2287 IOHNE&MARYSHEN orNeirhbor SHENJOHN EAND MARY 20242 CARTWRIGHT WAY CUPERIINO CA 95014 2228 ES014 RODRIGIIFS dtpFRnNo cn )94

CC 12-06-2022
432 of 759
2000MailintListAp .Meetings.xlsx \v_
lJst -
H*t
ITONGJOHN K SAND DYGUANI.TONG IRENETRUSTE IOHN K S & DYGUANI.TONG IRENE TONG or Neighbor 20556 DR IOHN P & JESSICA YU.I.AN WAI JESSICA o.Neirhbor WAI 10161 JOHN P AND 20?76
P & PATRICIA M or
P& ot S TRUSIEE RANDY 95014
JOHN P
JON SHIAO{HUNGTRUSTEE & ETAT
20488 9S014
20903
CACA or
0r
PL
DR

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO T & BARBARA R
YEN
IONATHAN & SHERRI REV tEE JONATHAN & SHERRI 10158 95014 2775 ,ONATHAN HSUIONATHAN YUAN & WENDY CHI LEI
HSU JONATHAN ETAL 'vlsrA cr HSUSU.LINGANDEVAHK 202€4 CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2222 LEI CUPERNNO CA 9SO14 oa
1305 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 ol

DR CUPERTINO
KIM HYUN vtsra DR

E CASTIITA EJR NILE DR
& MARIA C CI.AUS CLAUSJOSEPH A AND MARIA C STEVENS CREEK ELVD c& EPPELIOSEPH 20E74
20a32
95014
N &VARSIK M BABANEZHAD N AND VARSIK M CUPERNNO CA 95014P &AI.ICE C LEE c CUPERTINO CA 95014 H & ANNA TUNGJOSHUA H AND STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1519 CUPERTINO C4 or 20883 DR ot
ol LO274
20ilo
CHASE EANK 95014
CARI.OS &ANNA MARIA CARLOSAND ANNA MARIA CUPERTINO CI
JUDITH ATRUSTEE 1203 CUPERTTNO Cr 95014
MIYAMOTO JUDITH A VIRGINIA SWAN PL CUPERTINO CA 95014 or PARSONSJUDITH S FARGO DR CUPERNNO CA 95014 or
of OR
BLVD
2072920488

SHETLYSTEVENS CREEK
ETLIOTT VAN DEN OUDENAILER AMYTRU 20860
J CHEN

T LIMPER L TRUSTEE & ET AL
of MET cA 95014
DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 or
20583 DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
& ZAHRAT PAVIOVIC 10198 t-N CUPERTINO CA 95014
tU & ZHANG YU VAN 20790 DR

KAHKASHAN

KAI KAI PETER TRUSTEE & ET AL CHIEN SAMANTHA
KAIHUA AND FEI WENYI ot
or KUANG KAFKUNG AND
DR CUPERTINO cA 95014
& NEENA L BHATNAGAR CUPERTINO cA 95014
LJACKSON.KANIA 10235 ]wlLI cr CUPERIINO CA 95014
& ROLF S MEYER 2027L ,RElNEl-L PL CUPERTINO CA 95014
& DEANNA J TRUSTEE 10326 TONITA CUPERTINO ca 95014
or KARTHIK AND I(ORISETTAR

RAIU KARNK AND
VISTA
orot
D L€€M PRIMAS
KATHTEEN K SHAW or N.ithbor PL CT
Ar-vEs DR
CREEK ElvD 1513
CACA

M DEVRIIS
& MIKI
2@2720488

CUPERIINO

CUPERTINO
95014
95014
KELVIN EOON CHING LOW 8EE YIAN ST€VENS CREEK 20488 BtVD 2304 CUPERTINO cA 95014KENNETH & MAISIE KOO KOO KENNETH AND MAISIETRUSTE€ STEVENS CREEK 204a8 ELVD 23t6 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2297 PaBe 8 of 18
CC 12-06-2022
433 of 759
2000 Mailing List Api Veetin8s.xlsx
U/
faclltles
Hst
(ENNEIII CTAN o.Neirhbor TANKENNETHC DR CUPERIINO CA 95014 2915

LE-VINH LUU
& MEI TAM
K
of 95014
IUU
TAM
SHELLY

BIANCHI

AYAT KHALED AND NOHA
ot 95014 CA
CA
2099910174

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO

KIEN MENG &TAING IORI NGO NGO I(IEN

TOWN CENTER

AND CHAN KYLIE CTRUSIEE

BLVD CUPERTINO
m320
20509
8 CHENG
or 95014 CUPER1INO CA

ELVD CUPERTINO CA
KONK&VICTORIAYTEE 6r NeirhtF KON K AND VICTORIA Y MINER PL or Neirhbor KORAYONER KORAY AND YANG 20686 RODRIGUES
0r 20697
& SRINIVASAN SRIMMADHESIKAN AND SRINIVASAN 95014
KGOSWAMI KUMARK1RUSTEE&ETAt 1510 CUPERnNO CA 95014
PONAN TRUSTEE CREEK ELVD 1503 CUPERTTNO CA 95014
of 207ro GREENLEAF
20488 ot

H&ESTELLACCHAN

KWANG S & K KWANG SAND DESIREE KTRUSTEE
KWOK W KWOK WAND MAK BERNARDINE P ca 95014

KYLE MINJIAN AND DAPHNE NIXIN
MATTHEA(IS TARRYC DR CUPERTINO ca 95014 or
0f DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
ol CT CUPERTINO CA 95014
D&VIRGINIADTEWS or 20657 RODRIGUES AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014 G &JANICE S SURRIESCI STRUSIEE 20900 ALVES

HUAN ET AL HUAN ENG H AND HLANN
GIVER I.AWRENCE P AND RHONDACHANG
EHAT LAXMINARAYAN AND R PL 95014
LLC 10251 TORRE AVE 224 CUPERTINO CI 95014
I. CROTHERS 20777 FARGO DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
LIU TRUSTEE 10333
CHAO I.EESHU KUO

LEI AND LI
LEI & LIU HONGJIAN WAN6 or Neirhbor WANG TEI AND LIU HONGIIAN 20€;13 GRFENTEAF DR CUPERTINO CA gEOla 1EO? EI t & LU XUEQIANG ZHAO or Nei.hbor zHAO LEI AND LU XUEOIANG DUNCAR )o717 DR cltpFRnNo .I ssotd 1 qot TEROY F & MARGARETLJOHNSON orNeirhbor IOHNSON TEROY F AND MARGARET LTRUSTEE 101SS WESTERN DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2940 PL IESLIET & ROBIN CGUTTADAURO orNeighbor
-l & TANG YA Ll or Neichbor
MAO tLC N
TRUSTEE 1S07
LIANG
CACACA
1060020499
20484

DE ANZA

STEVENSCREEK

ELVDBLVD

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO
950149501495014
or LICHIH
TICHONG & ZHANG YU HU TOWN CENTER 20soo TN or Neirhbor HU L|C|{ONG AND ZHANG YU 230 CUPERTTNO Cr 9S01a 3265

TIJUN YAN DR
ET At LILY AI.LEN 20488 STEVENSCREEK ELVD 1313 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 tIN & GAO MIN YAN6 tIN AND GAO MIN TRUSIEE STEVINSCREEK 20484 8LVD 1877 CUPERNNO CA 95014 2297 AND HUAN SHANGTRUSTEE LIN 10368 BEARDON DR CUPERTTNO CA 95014 1916 LIN YTRUSTEE & STAL ]CHAN STEPHEN TRUSTEE

WEISS MOUIDING
to144 or
oa

MINER CUPERTINO PL CA
CA
9501495014
.ING CHOU orNeiehbor CHOU tlNG 10241 CA
.ING XIAO IONG or Neiehbor LONG LING XIAO 20444 STEVENSCREEK BLVD 210s CUPERnNO C 95014 22A7 & WANG HUAZHI XIA ot 70227 WESTERN DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 2944 I(AMgNOMAS(qANFOPN orNeirhbor ISANFORDLISAMANDTHOMAS( 2oag8 PaSe 9 of 18
CC 12-06-2022
434 of 759
2000MailinSListAf .Meetings.xlsx
.L/
Hsf

TLOYD A AND MINER PL
or MINER 95014
CUPERNNO HOTET or N DE cA 95014
10240 CA
TOUIS BTRUSTEE & 20669 CUPERTINO CI 95014
TOUIS PRUSA PRUSA TOUIS ATLISON M TRUSIEE CUPERTINO AVE 2OO LOUISE MARIE PARISH Pt

PARISH PL
H AND JOLENE G TRUSTEE 10305 ct
PATRICIA CARTER IYNN PATRICIA 20683 cA 95014
U 70275 CUPERNNO CA

KAVITA TRUSTE KUMAR RD CUPERNNO CA
KAVITAGODAVARN RAMAN KAVITA CREEK EtvD 1501

VAZIN MAHSA NILE DR
F YOUNG .YOUNG MAISY F or 2@88
of 10194
cA 95014cA 95014
cRossRoADs rLc LLC CUPERT|NO Ct 95014
MARGARET PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 95014
N MARIA N CREEK SLVD 1608 CUPERTTNO CA 9s014
UARIA NAI.PEN SHING or Neiehbor MARIA ro227 cr\4ARIA V KIEIN o. Neirhbor 20232 20s25
MARIETTA SIEII.IA TRUSTEE & ET AL CUPERNNO cA 95014
MARII.YN A HANSEN MARII.YN A TRUSTEE cA 95014
A ROBERTSON MARKA PL CUPERTINO cA 95014 of
ALVES DR CUPERTINO ca 9s014 or
ol 20488 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1410 CUPERTINO CA
ZANKICH ANTONIOLI WITLIAM TRUSTEE 10100 s
A PENNINGTON 10109

CHIEN SUNG

M SCHIFFMAN SCHIFFMAN MARY M TRUSTEE
HEINE MARYI.OU A TRUSIEE ET 95014
KAWAI MASANOBU 272 CUPERnNO CA 95014

SOHA MATY
& MIN{HAU !IU
PL
SIKCHEUNG LN 742 3265
BLVD 2704
CACACA
. PARLETT

TOWN CENTER

STEVENS CREEK

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
95014
9501495014
20488
20500 CUPERTINO
HWANG MAY.SHINETRUSTEE & ETAT scoFtEtD DR 20835 CUPERTTNO cA 95014 2922 MEIWUU TEE or Neirhbor LEE MEI WUU TRUSIEE 20643 scoFtEtD DR CUPERTINO CA qso14 )945 or
CHANG 207n
BLVD
DR
L2O2 CA
CA
MA MEI.TI

MEICHUAN T ET AL

STEVENS CREEK
DUNEAR

CUPERNNO

CUPERTINO
95014
95014 1801
TVU

CHANG DOROTHY
PY
1808
DR
CACA
ororol
20276
20488
10151

PINNTAGESTEVENS CREEK
PKIA'Y
BLVD

CUPERTINO

CUPERNNO
950149S014
MICHAEI. D AND I.ESI.IE D
CHU MICHAEI. KTRUSIEE & ETAL

LIN MICHAELHEYNES
UICHAEL WOtF or Neishbor WOtF MICHAEL lvrRGrNrAswAN PL 70326 CUPERnNO CA 95014 2025 \4ICHEI.LE LUM or Naichbdr LUM MICHETIETRUSTEE 20810 PEPPER TRE€ LN CUPERTTNO CA 95014 29!t MA TOWN CENTER TN 262 CUPERTTNO CA 95014: 3255
MIKE &JANETSHU dr Neirhbor SHU MIK€AND JANET 2M88 STEVENSCREEK i BLVD ].2IO CUPERTINO CA 95014 2287MILLY CHANG CHANG MIILY IRUSTEE & ET AL NILE CUPERIINO 10229 IDR cA 950141 2145 MIN zHANG or Neirhbor ZHANG MIN iPARISH 1022L PL CUPERINO cA 95014 2205MIN{HAN JOHN & SHU.MING TANG CHOW oT NeiThboT ]CHOW MIN.CHAN JOHN AND SHU-MINGTANG TRUSTE 10264 IMINER PL CUPERTINO ca 95014'. 2013 MINCHlIAN THANG orNeiehbor ZHANGMINCI{UANANDLUANTOM LING 20255 9INNTAGE PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 9SO14 21?{

CC 12-06-2022
435 of 759
2000 Mailint List Ap: Meetings.xlsx
l0U&10122 Sandlev Drlve, Cumrtlno
faclltles
CHAO CHEN oa
oa
&E
TORRE
AND LIN.YE
GAT€ DR
20805 CA 95014 1823
2061S
TRUSTEE ELVD 1307

TRUSTEE
20500
cA 95014
CACACA
of
or
PL
LN
YUAN

WEI XIAOYUAN YANG YANG MINGYAO AND WEI
YUAN
950149501495014
296/.2232 CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO DUTT
S SONG
LWOOLWORTH WOOLWORTI{ MORIAH

MOON S TOWN CENTER
TOWN
NAGENDRA SRINIVAS & PADMAI.AL CHERUKUPATI.I or Neishbor CHERUKUPALTI NAGENDRA SRINIVAS AND PADMAIAI. 20961 GARDEN GATE DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 1809 NAK HYUNG & KI YEUN KIM or NEichbor (IM NAK HYUNG AND I(I YEUN 10180 EAREARA IN CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2901 & ROBERT KOSHIYAMA NANC'Y FARGO DR or
orol
208332029820484
NARENDRA & ANUMDHA KANNPUDI or Neichbor MACADAM KANNPUDI NARENDRA AND ANURAOHA 9SOta 10163 LN CUPERTINO d )176NARENDRA & SUJATHA SANTHANAM d. Nai!hb6? SANTHANAM NARENDRA AND SUJATHA 20150 PEACHTREE LN CUPERIINO CA 95014 201€ NATHAN HANDELSMAN or Ne&hbor HANDEI.SMAN NATHAN TRUSTEE & ET AL PEPPERTREE 20804 LN CUPERTINO CA 95014 2911 NATWARI.AL M PANCHAI or Neirhbot GITA N TRUSTEE STEVENSCREEK 20195 ELVD CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2351 or
or

NEAL CA
CA
CA
95014
95014
95014
CREEK

STEVENS CREEK
CREEK

ELVDBLVDELVD
17157702
CUPERTINOCUPERTINO Nrl
HNG
2(X8a20488

R BAKER
PRANEHA N MEHTA cr CUPERTINO
SHAN CREEK BwD 73t7
oroa CA
CA
R AND CHANG ALICEAI.YUAN TR

NIC( M ANDJOANNE BTRUSTEE & E

N NIHAR SAND
202U
20488
9501495014
NING ZHAO ZHAO NING :STEVENS CREEK 20d,Aa BwD 1604 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2247 NIRAJG&ASHWNI NKANTHI or Neiqhbor KANTHI NIRA' G AND ASHWINI N TOWN CENTER 20s00 IN 191 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 3265 NINN KUMAR oT NeiThbo. KUMAR NITIN TRUSTEE iVEENA KUMAR BYPASS T R 102m N DE ANZA BLVD CUPERNNO CI 9SO14 2279 NMSEPCSLDHE or
qrotot S & XIOMAM KJAYASENA

RACHEL S ASMMOVITZ

HACKFORD
PtwEt t-tAo PL

YAN SHUI HSIA
20613 SCOFIELD DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
oa SO OSCAR KAR WAH IR 20488 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1208 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 J MCCULTOH 0f
CIRCI.E LLC
10160 CIRCL€ EAST
IRUSTE€ 20976 DR
or GURLEY PATRICIA A TRUSTEE 20488 STEVENS CREE( BLVD 1gO1 CUPERnNO CA 95014 BRUNETTI or RUBINO RANDY CUPERTINO CA 95014
R GREENLEE of ca 9s014
PATRICK D DEANE or Neiphbor DEANE PATRICI( D AND TINDA CIRRIE CIIOYTRUST )66)7 CRAIG CT cupERnNo ca 9s014 2912 PATRIC(P&PIN{HUANYU I orNeirhbot YU PATRICK P AND PIN{HUAN TRUSTEE 20304 PINNTAGE PKWY PY CUPERTINO CA 95014 2731 &t
LUCAS PAUL W AND VALERIE A TRUSTEE 10304
PAUL YUAN CHIANG TEE o. Nei.hbor LEE PAUI.YUAN CHIANG TRUSTEE & ETAL LEE ANN 8AO TRUSTEE 'TORRE 10251 AVE 118 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2186 PAULAJOSEPH or Nei.hbor IOSEPH PAUTA iSTEVENS CREEK 20484 BLVD 22L6 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2247 PCG CUPERTINO LLC 1OO% or Nairhbor PC6 CUPERTINO LIC 1dF,6 207A5 .STEVENS CREEK 8wD CUPERTINO CA 95014, 2123 95014
PEGGY 20488 CREEK BLVD
ANN
PEI KAO or Neirhbor KAO PEI TRUSTEE 10334 Pt
Pa8e 11 of 18
CC 12-06-2022
436 of 759
20@ Mailing tist Ap Meetings.xlsx
List
H*f
YING.TZU O or 206/3 CUPERNNO CA
&ETAL ) of 20222 CUPERTINO CA
PETER 1RUSTEE

P&RITASWU PETER P CREE( BLVD
PHAM TAN & or PHAM TRUSTEE iGLENCOE 95014
SANDTINA t 20776 CUPERTINO CA 95014
& HU I.EON YOUNG or PEYRUU WAY CUPERTINO
or GREENLEAF DR

TRUSTEE
AI.ICE HSUEH-YIN PAN YIHSIN AND ALICE HSUEH.YIN 20488
& CHRISNNA DIEP PHILLIP ANO CHRISTINA 206,9 95014
PHYITIS L REINHARDT :REINHARDT PHYI.LIS L N 10200 95014PINGCHIH CUPERNNO CA 95014 or 1805 CUPERnNO CA 95014 ot
CUPERTINO CA 95014

ANZA BLVD CUPERTINO CA
& PONGPINITAND KHEMMARIN VISTA DR

R & ROHIT R SOOD POORNIMA R AND ROHIT R PARISH PL
S & TAXMI MANNE PRABHAKAR S 20833 HANFORD
LO227

EHAMAVINJAMURI
& KARIPINENI CHANDANA PRAVEEN AND KARIPINENI CHANDANA CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2205 &JUAN LIU JUAN DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 2962
WENG CEI,ITER IN r97 CUPERnNO CA 95014
20488 STEVENS CREEK BIVD 720d ot
& CHANDRASHEKAR VI KARMUGIT 10241
vtLtAtoBos 20272

T&GOSWAMI TAND GOSWAMI MEENU TRU

ARORA ET AL ARORAANAMIKA
MHEJA RAJESH MADANLALAND SIMRAN PI CUPERTINO cA 95014 2012 0a RA,IV&HEMARCHAMRAJ 20791 or Neighbor CHAMRAI RA,IV AND HEMA R TRUSTEE scoFtEt D DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2922 RAJU AND PARISH PL CUPERTINO cA 95014 or
ROXANNE EARNETT ol 95014 DR
DRDR
CACA
or0ror
CACA
CA
20663L022710247
]GREENLEAF
NILE

CUPERTINO
CUPERTINO P & SHEII.A MOHAN
K & VELIANKI RAMA K AND VEITANKI SAII.AJATR

NAGPAL RAMCHAND AND SHAKU TRUSTEE
MNDYYING.RUEYAND GOR

CH&MILLIELKO
& PAMELA Y CHANG
SANTHA GAMPAI.A
PARAMESWARAIYER 95014
950149501495014

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINO
2048820488
]STEVENS CREEK
CREEK

BLVDBLVD
15141505
H PATRICIA A TRUSTEE 20568 DR CUPERTINO

RAYMOND LAND HEIDI NTRUSTEE
IAYMONDTAK.HOI L€UNG 70224 o. Nei.hbor LEUNG RAYMONDTAK-HOI AND HSIAOJENNIFER tl MINER PT CUPERTINO CA qso14 ))9e 0l TEE wAtot
& LICHUN JANE WANG
A&DIANELHUNTSINGER 20488 CREEK CUPERTINO BLVo 2rO7 cA 95014

HANFORD
or 246
DRDR
CACA
CA IMOI{TAGUE RICHARD.I AND LAI CHINGVIVIAN

RICHARD ATRUSTEE & ETAL

RICHARD E ANDJEAN D
207LO
20815

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO
950149501495014
IICHARD MINGI & WU CHINGLUN CHOU 10?01 or Neirhbor 'CHOU RICHARD MING-I AND WU CHINGLUN 9ARtETT PL CUPERTINO crA 9so14 20al ot
BHATIA

ROELJONSON
O SELEY FI FNDA DR CU9ERTINO a ssol! 1ffi
at qsol! ))41 J & LISA KENNEDY
10143 MINER PL CUPERTINO cA 95014 2201
CI I9FRTINO .A qqol4 241

CC 12-06-2022
437 of 759
2000 Mailing ListAp MeetinSs.xlsx
'U,
and
PICKLE 0l RANDY
SHU CHUN 20500 ot CUPERTINO cr 95014

ROEERTVTRUSTEE&ET

JAISWAT PL CUPERTINO ROBY

A NILE DR
SISHOP OF SAN JOSE BISHOP OF SAN 10110 N 95014
AJAKOB STEVEN M RONATD A 20488 CA 95014
tEE
of
DR CUPERNNO cA 9SO14

TRUSTEE AVE CUPERNNO CA

ETAL DR CUPERTINO
SUYI KAN6 KANG RONG AND SHAO SUYI 20331 PINNTAGE PKWY
LEE ROST 20329
TANfZ 20724 of
TRUSTEE cA 95014
AND NAMYANASWAMY ARCHANA BTVD 1615 CUPERTINO CA 95014
SAI HOU IEONG or Nekhbor SAI HOU TRUSTEE BANDLEY DR CUPERTINO CA 95014'AICH WAY LtC SAICH WAY or 10033 SAICH
or 20910 ELINDA

SJ & SARAH CTSAO AND SAMH CTRUSIEE
c& SAMMYCAND ROSALYN CTRUSIEE
c PL CUPERTINO CA 95014 ot
CHEN SAMUELI CUPERTINO CT 95014 or
STEVENS CREEK ELVD 1505 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 0l
20488 CREEK SLVD 121? CUPERTINO CA 95014
ol 10201 iNILE DR CUPERTINO cA 95014
& CHOI JISOOK LEE 20?2r .PINNTAGE PKWY PY
& ETAL DUTTA ANURADHA TRUSTEE DUTTA
& SANIOSH AND MENON REKHATRUST
or BOREI.II SARA Y
GARDEN GATE 20695 DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
D&MEDHASDEO lRUSTEE 10138 EONNY DR CA 95014

EASSETT SCOTT A AND FUKUMURA NAOKO

PAR( SCOTTYAND

HOU SEAN
& WONG HOI-IINGTSANG
& SENTHILKUMAR 10161 PL CUPERNNO CA
HAN 10172 PARISH PL CUPERNNO CA
K 20115 CHAVOYA DR CUPERNNO CA 95014
P SHAN P TRUSTEE & ET AL LU PEI TRUSTEE 20730 FARGO DR CUPERNNO CA 95014 OT SHANKO AND FENG STEPHANIE S TOWN CENTER tN 258 CUPERTTNO CA 950140a LIU SHANSHAN AND & CHOU CHEIN.I WEI
&
S TRUSTEE & ET AI. HEGDE SHWETA STRUSTEE 20860 FARGO DR CUPERTINO cA 95014 WANG SHARON AND WU SHYII SHIUN TOWN CENTER or 20500 t-N 196 CUPERTINO CA 95014 otor I P TRUSTEE ca 9s014
FENG

EDMUND & SAN
& (UO LINDA

CHE TSAI
& LIN CHIAHSUN

CC 12-06-2022
438 of 759
20@MailingListAp! vleetings.xlsx
HO or HO STEVENS CREEK
iHIRIN BAKHSHI or Neichbdr BAKHSHI SHIRIN TRUSTEE 20500 186 CUPERTINO CACA 9S014
95014 22St
or Neiqhbor SHIRTEY HSOU-WEN CHUNG CHUNG SHIRI.EY DR CUPERNNO

NG NG CUPERNNO
POLU CHANDMKAI.AVATI{I STEVENS CREEK
EAST
SHIVAKUMAR & ADIMOO|AM SHANTVEN(ATARAMAN 6r NaichSor VENKATARAMANSHIVAKUMARANDADIMOOTAM SHANT ] 10256 GLENCOE DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 181iSHOBHAVA VISWANATHAN SHOBHAVATRUSTEE 10311 95014 PROPERTIES CUPERTINO cA 95014 or
PI CHEN DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 0r
TRUSTEE & ET At CREEK BLVD
WAI GO SHUN WAI AND NG (IN 20770
or 20370ol cA 95014
& ETAI CUPERNNO CA 95014
T & PARK HYUN TAND PARK HYUN LN 163 CUPERTTNO CA 95014
PARK soYooN CREEK BLVD 1413 CUPERTINO CA 95014
YAO SO.ZEN 20960 GARDEN GATE DR ot
PALI.A SRIDI{AR R TONITA CUPERTINO CJ ot
20985 ALVES DR CUPERTINO or
& JUIIET K NG 20744

C&NANCYICHU NANCY I TRUSTEE
STANIEY AND I.AI IRIS YI.I.IN cA 95014
STANIEY L AND BONNIE B cA 95014 or
or DR CUPERNNO CA 95014
MANEA of 20488 CREE( BLVD 2210 CUPERTINO CA 95014
G DEE 20489 .sTEvENs
C ETAL C ALTARIO 10291
or HAMRICK SIEPHEN
ot IIN STEPHEN
YANG STEVE AND oa
CA oa
HUNG.CHI & MARY ENG HSIEH 20861 DR cuPERllNo cA 95014
NARA VISTA DR B CUPERTINO CA 95014
P & CHANG TYCHIN TRUSTEE 20588 scoFtEt"D DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 COMMERCIAL I.LC 20444 2010
ocA owNER t-tc
YUM SU ILAND YOUNGJATRUSTEE & ETAL ot
NK
&JACK KUANG-HENG CHIAO DR
BETW KO 20703 DR CUPERTINO cA 95014
AND IMSUN 20488 CREEK BLVD 2101 CUPERTINO cA 95014
CHOI SUNGSUN AND DIANE 20584 DR CUPERTINO ca 9s014
SI,JNNYC.ADIA
& MADHU KUMAR
MAN
CHEUNG SUSAN STRUSTEE 20s47 AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014
TOWN 279 CUPERTINO cA 95014
YYU YU SVENSSON SUSAN SZU.MIN Y A CUPERTINO cA 95014
D & PYNG.ING LIU
TAI ca 9s014

CHING &TSUEI LIEN SHYU
&
u.c 10225 DR
10194 DR

CC 12-06-2022
439 of 759
2000 Mailing list Apr ,eetinSs.xlsx
Hs€ t
10331 PL
FANG

SWAN PL
M &WANG t WANG I 95014
w CA 95014
& TERRA MARY of MARY 204&l SLVD 2203

CUPERTINO LLC
THAII.AI AND P(WY
DO or TR CA 95014 E& of E AND FOENG M 20818 CUPERTINO CA KIM O 208a9 DR CUPERNNO

THOMASAND TANG DR
& WANG YUEH{HEN 0f RODRIGUES AVE
D & MARION E or VISTA DR
of
CAMARDA LISA TJOSEPH 20193 95014 2235
T FUJINAGA FUJINAGATHOMAST 10174 cA 95014 2L7S
TIAN.MING TIM & YUEH.YUN AMY I.AY o. Neilhbor LAY NAN.MING TIM 20804 CUPERTINO CA 95014 NANYING & ZHAO XINRAN JI orNei?hbor ELVO 2717 CUPERTTNO CA 9sO14 NEN-I.ER IIN or Neirhbor TIN TIEN.LFR TRUSTEE JEAN AVE
TRUSTEE DR or
PENNY ETAL TOWN CENTER LN 199
TINA CHEN TRUSTEE uu 10186
Ltc 10251 cA 95014 or
of CUPERTINO CA 95014
ot ELVD 2309 CUPERTINO CT 95014
CHANG CAROL CHUAN.YI PL
HONG WONNE TRUSTEE t-N
tAt TONY YU TUNG STEVENS CREEK BLVD
PROJECT 10150

AVENUE PROPERNES TORRE
PTAZA TORRE PI,AZA 10201 TORRE or
20aa4 or10280 95014 or
IRAC'T HSU 20696 or Neiahbo. HSU TRAC'yTRUSTEE & ETAt CA TMNS{ONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE INVS CORP ETA or Naichbdr REAL ESTAIE INVS CORP FTA JEFFSAM CUPERNNO CA 95014 FINANCIAI INC DR CUPERTINO c4 95014
TSAI TSAI TSAO-TUNG LO237 wtt cr

FINANCIAL INC
RU KUANG CHEN orNeirhbor CHENTSU KUANGANOLIAOYUTING 20s59 LIN HSINN A CUPERNNO CA 95014
Y TSAI UNDINE YTRUSTEE CUPERTINO CA 95014
CHURCH OF UNION CHURCH OF CUPERNNO BLVD CUPERTINO CA 95014 BANK NA US BAN( NAASSC s BLVD
ELUMAI"AI ctR
DR

CHARUMATH
CUPERTINO CA 95014

PKWY PY
or
oforot
JOSEPH

PINNIAGE

SUNRISE
ANZA
2020320246205252077120646
2235
N
AYALUR
CACACA
oforol
DR
PL
DR

SHIVAKUMAR S BOODANNAVAR

MOLUKUTIA

JOGINAIDU

R AND VADDI REKHA R

VENKATA JOGINAIDU AND SIRISHA

UPPULURI VENKATA N

CUPERNNO

CUPERTINO

CUPERNNO
95014950149S014 10131
20513

PARLETT

SUNRISE
r'IcIOR R & FROSNNE G EECKMAN i orNei?hbor BECKMAN VCTOR R AND FROSNNE GTRUSTEE 10311 CHERRYTREE LN cupERTrNo ca 9s014 200sfl DOVICH-CUPERTINO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP drNeirhb6t VIDOVICH<UPERTINO I.IMITED PARTNERSHIP 103SS BLVD CUPERTINO CA qso14 t6)7 N DEANZA VIDYASAGAR & VINEETA DESHPANDE 6r Neirhbdr VIDYASAGAR AND VINEETA VIETVAN THIEN tE tE VIETVAN THIEN AND NGUYEN TRANG THUYTHI CRAIG 20647 CT CTI9FRINO a ssola )91) VIJAYA KUMAR & RENI.JKA CHAWA JSTEVENS CREE( BI V') 77)O ctrpFRnNo CA qsota )241

CC 12-06-2022
440 of 759
2000 Mailing List Ap Meetings.xlsx
or 20510 LN
L &JUDITH E or E 70322 PL
AND NAMBIAR CARTWRIGHT cA 9SO14
SAPNAGUPTA or GUPTA CUPERTINO ca 9s014 & AND BURRA (AVITA 20500 276 CUPERTINO CA VIVIAN W I.AM o. Neichbo? W ETAL YIU CHEONG IN 183
VIVIANA MONTOYA.HERNANDEZ or Neirhbor 'STEVENS CREEK MOtfiOYA-HERNANDEZ VIVIANA ELVD 2o4aa l 1304

DV CREEK ELVD
K& ot PARK cA 95014
& ETAL or 20500 CA 95014
AND CHIANG 10209 CUPER'IINO CA 95014
703t2 Pt CUPERTINO CA 95014

WARREN L CUPERTINO

CIRCTE WEST

TRUSTEE
AL TU
AVE 108
orol
L LEE

CUPERTINO
/VAYMOND JOE.'UNG or Nehhbor WAYMOND JOETRUSTEE & ETAL TERRY L0282 CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2951 WAYNEANDWU 20488
LI

TRUSTEE

CACACACA
ofol PL
DR

WU LUIU HUANG
& MU CHUNXI
950149501495014

CUPERTINO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO

TAI PING & HSI PARISH PL
KWANG.HWEI CHU
TENG
TRUSTE
or 20d,8,3
&
&
& CA

CACACACA
PI
DR
PL
wEtLt-cXU
wEttLc
wEt

YOU WEIDONG AND
SHEN WEI-MIN6 ANDYIN WEI.SHIN

STEVENS CREEK

STEVENS CREEK
TOWN 20500
2077720629 95014
950149501495014
292332652903
2221

CUPERNNO

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO

HORUS CHEN
& rou

WENHAU HORUSTRUSTEE & ETAI

WANG WENHONG AND LOU

BEARDON

VIRGINIASWAN
6a
A'ESTWOOD COMPANY.CUPERTINO ttc dr N.irhb6r wFsT COMPANY.CUPERTINO ItC ca 95014 EVAND SYLVIATRUSTEE AND SYLVIATRUSTEE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 C&WONGVITA WLIIAM CAND WONGVITA DR CUPERTINO CA 95014
H& TSAI W|LIIAM H AND PATRICIA CIRCTE EAST CUPERTINO CA 95014 ot ROSE LO272 TERRY
20488 CREEK ot
20L99 ot

VIVIAN W CHEN TRUSTEE
N I.IN
Y PAN WtLY CA 95014
oa TOWN CENTER LN 193 CUPERTINO cA 95014ot 20488 STEVENS CREEK ELVD 1311 CUPERTINO CA 95014 HUNG ol KUO EN 20488 CREEK ELVD 1774 CUPERTINO
& WU PING ZENG 10220

HUANG ET AL
& ZHANG XIN XIAOCHUN AND ZHANG XIN

ZHOU XIAOFAN AND WANG YUMEI
XIAOQI & tEI WANG or Neirhbor AND LEIXIAOXIA &ZHANG OU YANG orNeirhbor YANG XIAOXIA AND ZHANG OU I(AOZHONG & JIA WEN WANG or Neiqhbor WANG XIAOZHONG AND JIA WEN l(IN & CHANG YE GUO or Neirhbor GUO XIN AND CHAN6 YE 10199 DR CUPERTINO CA 95014 2743 2096610121
DR
PL

CUPERTINO

CUPERNNO
CA
CA
95014
9S014 ZHENG
IGREENI.EAF DR CUPERnNO CA 95014 1907

CC 12-06-2022
441 of 759
2000 Mailing List Ap Meetings.xlsx
tist -
XU AND XUN CREEK 95014
CAI XUE cA 95014
cAo 20627 DR

YAN AND CHEN PL
CHEN or CHEN
cHt SIO NGA ET AL ot 95014
20598 cA 95014
YIFANG TRUSTEE TRUST to262 CUPERTINO CA

TRUSTEE DR CUPERTINO
TIAN TAN CREEK ELVD 7372 or
& TRUSTEE DR ol
ET AL ot
KING
R&ADITYAPSANTOSO YENNI R CA 95014 20766
R& P CUPERTINO ca 95014 ot
TRUSTEE LN CUPIRTINO of
BEE YEH AND 8AI 8EE TRUSIE€ ALVES OR
ZHANG ZHANG YI 20488 STEVENS CREEK
& LIU YIFEI AND 20805 or
GUO 2047s
2134
cA 95014 2203
u CUPERTINO CA 95014 7879
XAONNG WANG AND ZHANG XIAOTING crR CUPERTINO CA 95014

EIAN CHEAH YIN EIAN AND PARADISE DR
CHANG CHANG YING TRUSTEE 20500 TOWN CENTER LN of
FANG LO22A N of
or 20500
ca 95014
I.II.YCHAN LILY TNUSTEE CUPERTINO ca 95014
CHUNG YIPTRUSTEE CREEK BLVD 2315 CUPERTINO CA 95014
& YAN XIA YIRAN AND YAN XIAOII PARISH PL CUPERTINO CA 95014 or 20751 SHEtI.Y DR
ot STEVENSCREEK 20488 SLVD
10253 NILE ol
oa 20770
CHANG
& PENG XIAOJUN
HOU

PENG XIAOJUN
CHANGSHU.CHUANGLTRUSTEE 10291
/OUNG EON KIM or Neirhbor KIM YOUNG EON AND SIN HYUN SUK KIM TRUSTEE PEPPER TREE 20840 LN cuPERlrNo cA 95014 2958 YOUNG M€N S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF S C VALI,EY or Neirhbor YOUNG MEN S CHRISNAN ASSOCOF S CVALTEY 20803 ALVES DR CUPERIINO Ct 95014 1825 YOU.YUH & SHU.TZU SHYR or Nei.hbor SHYR YOU.YUH AND SHU-TZU TRUSIEE 20556 TSUNRISE DR CUPERT|NO CA 95014 2971 20888

WAY CUPERIINO
CUPERTINO BLVD 18OI
ofoaoa CA
CACACA
ORDR
PWU
&ZHAO WEIYING LIU
YU.CHUAN AND CHENG CHIH{HIENG
,CHANG YUEH.YUN
CHONG
TSAI 95014
950149501495014 & MANWEN SHIH WANG
HSI.ING CHEN 20{,Aa
10270
20925 :GARDEN GATE
CREEK

CUPERTINOCUPERTINO
YUN FEI JIANG dr Neishbor iSTEVENS CREEK 20488 BLVD 1810 CUPERTTNO CA 95014 2281 YUNG&RONYYFENG or Neichbdr FENG YUNG AND RONY YTRUSTEE 204L2 !ELENDA DR cupERTtNo ca 95014 18(X PAO.CHENG ET AL
20488 CREEK BLVD 9S014 2312 CUPERTINO CA & NGUYEN
'UN-HSIAN6
HONG orNehhbor HONGYUN-HSIANGTRUSTEE 20484 'STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1512 CUPERTINO CA 95014 22e7 IUNJIAIIANG orNeirhbor IJIANGYUNJIA 10152 MACADAM tN CUPERTINO CA 9SO14 )775

CC 12-06-2022
442 of 759
2@0 Mailing List Ap Meetings.xlsx
Hse t
of 10184 CA 95014
AND YE YING 20s00 LN c4 247 CUPERTINO

MANJU CHERIAN ZACHARIAH AND AVE CUPERTINO CA
& XIONG XIAOFENG XIA DR
ZH€GANG AND KANG NAN WANG 20488 95014
GU TRUSIEE 1.0207 CUPERTINO CA 95014
& or DR CUPERTINO CA
ZHENG 20731, HANFORD
&TAN GUAN ZHENGUO TRUSTEE or
ol

CC 12-06-2022
443 of 759
)
-s
o
-I.J0, '9o-No
n
oI
I
oooE
3o
Jc
+
Ett
--ac) o,IJr+aa
-{o(') .+oJ6'
G'
=. o- -
o-l (nC)
o-E
g
ooIo
E
3o
J-r+!o
-3-ar.+
+t
aa
IT'
I
N) N)
O
N)
I O
OP
c)o
33g=-aa.+ogr+
-o
0,
CI
J-
Vl g
-J3
o
--ao
Ut
-{(lJ
o
+Fw
I
CC 12-06-2022
444 of 759
8s
=ol rJ.=:' C!,=.! €$E?gFt<I^q co3E=Sde
g E9 q g q F F
F l Et ; g I 1q
€ !isg;l :F 6lel' E -s 3 : f
d
n Ei *
2 fr g H
n
g HF= fi
H
= ?g 8. Et
e qF t t f; t
F d Ea ' - 'r f EE t I
= o.r
p
H t eg
g ! af.F.+.^J\l lt -6 10 itt =.+ E
3 gtg
g
N
trE - -i5
2 qF.
g gt = ;' ctt q, o5'g9
oc)eo_li ..t
J
o
1trC' b.oc} .+
CC 12-06-2022
445 of 759
s
[ri
Bsf,$F E CII
f
g'$E$
!3
.., Ml;,i lu,.,
(ir
I .l r'tt
;an uL[s g s
E
q
CSNFN
t r tl't t
l, ;d "l
I r't,t l,t ""
, r 'lll'; t' .:'' , ll ,I
lr; ii ,,t 1 'ii'
,.,
I
r)tso F -o-m *GFE
imSo 2ncZ oPq
>
^4
t >x>
oY
a u-; oos Fr-m 5Z-.| bq(^)A (!-
o-ra't
:i
i.r"lf .a
=:-'iir
.-:-. ilr
_:-- t:i
'.:..- l-'
:':: -':':: ill
'_ L,
,= "'
.:'::''
:-:: j-'
:- r-r:
:='
I
._.
f.i
L'- 1..,
:
,..
-.: r'-' 'i:.: r
i.i"l
;1i
:i. : ii
.ir l ti
i:.,
t:,
',:lt
t!,
:tri
ffi ir;, i'i Jf
".]
r:.i iil
t,,l
\l
I,
A
f
,l ,f .i JTlr
I
itfllr.l
{s
LU(C'
b,
t^,
r,.r
sr(0o\lulC' r'
iitJtr.l
i:ti),:tf,?ITI9ltl|l
ntpl9
F_1o,
€Hs=:ni i.zfl* t;; FFil€ EdU a59Eo.=.3
E[;3 €sH ifl. : .o-
<:
oco,
€
l
j
1 Iz')c
n)ol)
E
t{.,I
s
*
S
,J]9 fie:E;..la 'rta
r*:B'
;i€it'\hr!l3t
liF
r-r
..:
=:
lil
-- F.":' ir:
_t
:"' .:^l--. r,rr '-a_.,.tt-'=:
,
; ...i
-: t-;t
5:: i-'''--l
=.

F"
::. t
POoua0!
005 mtt >o:pa
oozI
n
'.il
i'l
:2..
l:: i/' : ri
':r r- i il
17, _.1_, : ii
l )-i :J
f-'
'-i lri -;
'-l tl
r,..':t, '
:f':i l i ii
;l.il,ii,:.1..)
i'"t
t'
it
al
'",it
)
:i;
fl(tI
r{,
t)t
ts
tore€
oo
=. 3:; 1(9 - {ra ^:
;
EEgt:Ei
i[sE E€g rrN 5e =' :J-s:- .l6F}} ?' ffiong i.ii .+
oI
o
-lmo
7 a)t90 - coi> E{2= T68.Ur_v.:!4 i4J! 2662 o.9
A ar4 u >6}
> (oc (rmO(, E2
Nm(oOt5
tJ
1 .-.
j ,,
,: ,,I
L J :'l I\. :: ,. ..!
'I
:l
i.i
ctr
m
|/'
F
Eo= AalD
IEee:qiH Ep;8 HHU; s5*E *=iH8
Ei;a €€€* :'<
N L o FP 5' 3
i
ctlJ:

Ill!tJIU;'r
ts
antgtlITattt,
t9
rfo
ttt3oiis
-:{Q
r..Xrt'Or'.4 ,l(a
;.r! l"r Cl :j l! ?IR
ii:p :r.itr
.,.
ii
(:;
"

1. il'-!
:: i'
_.
ia
i:..:
in
:.: i
'..!
.ilt i,:
:::

I
'ir
iil
':,; ',.., i'il
.t'.. -;!,,, 1;, ,:...
i (i ::;l|i.- ;,:
a r.l
'-'ift "J
';i. r i...?
rI; ii, r';r ;il .;:
''.1 ; - :-r
'-,! j {i
lfi
lil
iii
tii
:,)
nl
l"l
oc!ff,
v
z=o
c)
(o(,
ots5
ts@@
i.l )
[!
,-l
(i:,l. J.t'..1
i.. J
CC 12-06-2022
446 of 759
t(l
{J,tl
o
!
o
II.l
otrUlo
-t-afl0, iiI'
o
5 lto
HA
^qg F;
g Iiil 58n l,tO
tsii€i .'o t! cL lb t!,gd
!a
Io
:.
5 o,
J
3oec=. J
oq
J
o
c.=ovlET.D6'{
FsJ?=ri o=tnA u* 9il 8; H; -o<
IO3- J
-tad 65'Yo5'
-r (Xl r Oq .l .. J .. P> i.i> v1y o-l P=' or=.Jrr3}.,
lr,

NC' ONNN
€.D= 1E
I o9* J:i(D(DlD
IEgI:EEH3E sxdP:dF5;;
s 5 *E *= 3 H8,H
s
Eg;3 €sH*33 =<N
L olrD 5o='=-a
: dL lorl
=:
-6 o-9 c5' 9r6 €
:
t,.Q
jt'1
hl
i4tJ
it")ilt
IF
ITta
,It5
ta&
{
Io
ii.i
3 "f;ie l+" Ifi..,
A
-Fr a!
"UI Sil'i
'?iifr , iJ.,
11 r,1 fr
.r I' l, -t tJ, ltt
i, ,i 'S J'.,-r, i' l! ':l $ '[ rrrl I
"lrr)
.l' 1l
eH3fi *eEI
-rul"iQc Zms- ar>o
= :ta- gP >. E:
2 oC, tr t 68(!
o
::i
;r:
\i
)r
t'
lt,i
t\
i'
,d
't
it,
ii
,t
I
ti
{
I
€o
I
qo- JarD
Ad g -
q
tfi{*:EA* d.zi*:i.oi 3s;e SdFF
3 5 3E o= 3 $g ,ofi-d. o' =AP Ei;e 5;€* =<N
- o {-O. -' aJ3:
ocO)
:;'-, iti
i.riilIF(p5l
IF
rxl9lllotlrR
d
3o rilS
,-r1S :-'rJ
E;.;srie v'j!! iuSi
= r-:it*
fiilf;
:l
:...
..ti. ' r'';
-' .,:J
lj ji .r:
-1,i".;
'
:ip
'::"
a)tso < -O-> €,D!zz rn!,lo 6) 3 ':6 -<
=49
i vVaZ, a)<
O D1 -{ EE E P-l 5m
N'M (o5ro
t"i
t:.. 1,.: ::il:lr, rl 'i 't, i.; '.t i::: r'rl
; t.l.:i
ltt'r a :7
i :.1
t-i
':: l,'rr;) :.:, i ll
{'r; ''
::
t,;l
ii-l{lris'i..
r.i,r
I
i-t
I
.i'
i:11
':., .il i-ti
jij Iij Irl
i:, i /l
I rl
{":i.!
i\j
F
1 'o,a
€34=::a d'.zI*';; Es;P 5dF
b 5lE *=
?
E 6$:d. a3&
H=sa €EE sa -. '3
g
i'
:.1
a.i j.i )EgR iNtzX lf(DY :tl l:trY
t.-::,/:.1 i>6a i::j:i...'iF-rO ri'fr{ r'j ;X r) vf tr,-r, :'l 7t Z z r :-i..i ) Cf lti;',t. :; 3 :O
'-i ," i .-1,- -l .,i O
J r:);2. l.: s
';t :l
::, (:;r :,,:
:!' :t r::i
:it il irir
tll:,t
'a.'..ii;
:.:

I
.";
t..l
iJ
:
! t:lhl,.1rpIR
tq
TF
rp
t,tg'Pr{t
B
!
o
r l:SI rtci iI: tso
l'..S l-6
.J.G; :ih
i'{Ri'.ld rilSi:F
o
('i
t,3
;;r
l. -i
\ii
I
t')(i,
I
!
{jr
n
G
g
o
n=o
.:

F
1o,
€3s=:Ei d,.zI3';6 5-:a!3:N -oXot'IHT
e 5 i.E *3 3
E 65:d.63&
Hssa
f EF 50
='
sc(U
=
i,):/. .i
::i)Hoa)
:oa- r=Z> lUie.o jga- .l@t> zmd= r>ov r:''l#
> :jr>Xm U- .l:: 2
z
=, 3oo j! C,
.," i 6
5Lrm V,
i"t
.2:
l:- ifi .:'i
,0, tl i
Lrl -Il
, -
I-'1..i. ii
-j iri I
'-1 'u ,'i
{;) 1!:, i! '::l,.. "
'l:, q1 iii
:r!,Tt :;;l
lJi:,ti
l.!
ar
CC 12-06-2022
447 of 759
o.lt
or-
t
o
trUI
oI
3 r-a rit,rt-ra oI
J
cl3
f fie
€ r;E ; Fii g :fi4
? E5E
i EE;
Ef -rto :a='
o =m td
F=F i Eg
s --, E oe* o i
{ j rtro-d .4 ft
AJooor-,-CL(o
tFg*:Edx[+ Et H:
iElssgrggggg.;*
=.
--a -w o-(D'lr, E-?Hs
i[j
iiJ
l.i
ia
igIF
rl|
aa
t!'I
I
G
G rrt!
iYIQ
:H,Jls t$4
,hd tu
-Y-a 'F.t\ 6fi! .iH
rP
'i
:-I
ir
r) r,r't,(1, C'
r
I (l'lr" oLrl.
c) (+,
, J. ,,_n ';'
l!i err;;i
'r: p,1
i.,( ) {n
I
..)NOa)
-Or-E
=U)26 x 8E:
e
zoqtr o€H i-) g=
ro iri \r2o: ES(t- lu>
o
2:
l:::t :;':l
t-!l al .:::

I ?-i :it
lli r-r.::
;-t
"l't,l
ri:)::.;: . .l
ti ',.,1
l- -( ':. I il
;11 1 -1 :.1
'i' -, '-t
:r:' '::':r I li
::ii:tr,r,
l''r
'.i'
i.,':lj'l
i.^'f..:
lat
il
l,
'1
I
I
\
'1
i
I
I
i
,ti ,
t
i;r
..
,:ai:t,
I
{':r
,.Ii1.,::

I
i.l
I
-:r.
lrir
6i
o
ho
:
d
ir(ii
{cC}
l-rF
(nrst Sl
w; (3-= rn^l q
EEgq:ai
i E d€ a
P
H il5=':g oo=.o
El;3 €sH iF' : .?
oLO)
=
i-l
'[r fr 'llli t"i r:
-
l-' i-t . i
*i
i:! i:, ' ii
:iil f-i .;.:
:i, :{t lrl
,_t!l-]
::'- i.(l
'=='ulit
:-. i''
::: ;.r '::- ir,
;'--:_.
.-='
:-. r' __ i.r.t
-.::- tt
.-:-..r
** iil
--.

I
':-:- i-1='t j.
f.'t
iOIrJ$t(srP
(9l..l
,t9fi
lJmr9
s
D
!
l
a! :ilS
iii E i;,* r-.€
l:il! r{. ::iF
i:iEit#fi{ot -'ts
r'rl tso
N) t\)
cot!m
vIo
zI
F
l
IJ
jz
)
)n)
)0n
ir
,:!:)
i'l
?.]
,,tr:. !
t--
l l ':.
iii
F1
9o -:d3 PEa o,il9R ESE* lloH
ig$€ giEe Ee;3 €g€: i5.* : : :ai
ac
OJ=
Beb Hrr
go -t @:'+ mCrP ioz u- <. c'- o; z>
aee u€
mzga)r=IT
rioir3rpIJ(9dllr
ltl\0tfo
{
Io rill
iflcii'.e
Fa$r*T!q. r-tfr tflt
r,?Q ;itil ...5.riH$FJ
l.: ili :l
'-i
:
'ii
'ii
!;
1,j
j
..;:, ) -)'.'t n
itt 3
n
.2.
!:: i?'t ri
'0,-aj .
;
Iil ir r:::
l-' r-1 .::t
lIi r-1 .iil
i'l
I-t
iat
-t'\r:i
tf,.
.-l,n '!
..! ';; ';;!
r;) :r), i r;
::jJ t-.t ,:li!: l-:rrli
::it i|.{tr:, i,rr
lil
t:
t,-itr_l
I
(i')
-..i
I
i-l
i
F1
*o .:;R 952 o#93 r$83 jlaH Lzl*:i.?
i g i€ P ? g$ -N".i :+;^l Ei;= €iR: :r<NLo 5cL i' I :4. <:o
o,=
I'l
(O'i-,,rtF
I\tL tl
rn{;' .-l.L:rp(D (it(tr.t6'69tsg1F"Potnrt) tpd f{etu
€fr
I
G
S
sg
ponSs3.'a
b/Q
*"iE'$e
t'il
il
::-=
t.i'
I- .r
ri::: i.':- i-':"::-:-
':-.
: l'
.l:- .".
::. J
iil t'1,
:.:: r
::-i. i-'
::: i"t
.:, t
.i,.(li'
!.1
;i
''I -Po<
EI€3 zfigZ 64e9 .t< - D1
X (o= 8< I '.s6)
NJ (o(,
P
r.:,)
:. 1
:.':
r_- rr. ...i:z: i:. rl
'rr i..rl
r:)'i). i ii
:t' ?i lli
:l
1'; ''i iri '-l

1.,,) i.:
i
. rI;L. -l
l"! r.-,
;::l
:1!
CC 12-06-2022
448 of 759
o
Eo
JT-o
truo
I
-)
IIa.i !,F}-oo:'
FHA
^qg F:
g
Fit 58n n60
Esi
€€€ E;< :'o o CL .D tf,g6
?
0o
:E
J0,::'oo.c5
0c
)o
:oUIct
oo
€
Fvt XnJ?=Ft oi -F sS in
€ uj \< om :3 -o<
J=Oa- Jfrd
--.UA OSav=
-rOQ rOq .: .. J .. !9> i,r>
v tt -:E E3 or=' 5r3N
u, .N

NOONNNN
€(D= 3EP o9- * l:rf!rD(o
-d
g t8g
to1a:EdH3* d.zi* ?i'.o7o'* -Bs;g:dF5;; h5l.E *=gg8,H
g
Eg;3 €se**a ?<NLo='D 59-
=-
; o --'or3 < "6 oPci' O'6
:
lr:lti) l'J
i,,'rl,
r3rpj3
Dlt5rcQ
€
a! rfr
S
iii
E
f:iQFtq) !'{r/s ici6!r?- 6 rifu ri!a ;,lGLffi
tlir l
L{
il:l!';:')
-,:r
i..:?Jil'.1\r:!
,ll
o r J tr 5 ii(j:
: I'). Fr 5 (rr s'
o h) lt
o rj.,9i > .!' i'
Edd igi1'
ot' t,]
)tso
@ -ort Ai9{z> n!1 (DO
f".:m :-J2 2mE- <-o< r?
o i=e ;>3<
trv
s
I
tl
II
)
i;:.i l::
'
it
,i:' li i lj!-t t' -,
l ;-i:i] l:i it .; :
!i
'rl i'it;:);r, r::;, i-:r.:,1li': r;r ' :t
:t, :;!1 i tl
.-r i-, |
'
r-,, 1,t,
::
i.,1
"t.i(:r
I
'.' i
I
I'
I
t
,l
i
\
/
1i,it,
I
(
,l
I
'1,
I
t
ir
I
I
I
,{'
t
:,
c
ag
(
N
UUU
cqcqN
F
o,=
€*e=:fi d'.zi;l tu;
F F ie ; d 33"=9 qi Uto,J-.oJ SipB €E ;F- : .?
oc(!,
=
1tsO-Ol E!.?z tiq. fca
?nq aFO -73 1<tr<
;>D<
tr
on
i"';Nl
t?I:'
ri
l!ut
tttr!
I
e
€
3o
i-ri ci
i-.lY
r.rgo ivs '';iri
-
liJ:'
l!.1- ci
iiI-\ irrtQ ;ilB
#
[r:.;
i:
=.-:-. t(,
..Ia i--
'''l- l.' ji-.,,:,
::: it:r
.- ii,
,:'
::
:-'
*! rrr
..- I
:':: {i: ..-.tit
: ,'"^
ll:
l ":: i.'
--:- l-,
--_: i
(j,
cnN
on
iti
:-l'':
l:: (.!r .il
rll:.Li 'rj, ! | .:
l '-
n
Iiii-,jt:
i-l
.. I rlr .i
,-j
il ,. 1
rl!.r,'il
,i' 1, 'r ,;I
! ij i:i
'i:lii.:.i
:l]J
:Itlihlr,,1
)rl!:iirIlttllll
rlltptIlrtl
F
3 (lJ '-
€*s=:€l d.zi* oi.o
FEilF AdU
E[i3 E€E dF' : 'q
o.
tu
<
'.:
:;
rEr{
€
os
,.J.:Q
ii.H
L.to !$! *,t.
.'.G
:i- iL :':9
i:- io :';i it*. ,lE'.itn
d
C
q
Ir!
(tLrloH;N
P
mla
otso o col E BN-a EE-6:;
2=s " ol9Pe 6D o >s
o (o,V !!6Ho 'trONANMomCor
m
;:' .t.*
:,:- Ili I tl l.i:
,r,, ; i: ..1 ',- r
r' -.i:l'-r
i : :-':
i::i
' (::
j,,i
i,i;:l'...i-l:.il)
1{j :ii
',:.:. li
i',;"' I i:
"lt
," itl
jiJ i:j'.:ltr:i il)
i.a'
a;i
r,.'!
:
ilii:i{5}" '.i
I!
i:\)
t:i'"1) i:)
l-r;.:i. i;..J
€rDI
t!, rl.o,
*'33*:Ti f,.zi*",;; Epd!'3dU
3 5 3E *= 3
$ gi;: €gH i5.- :
rd
-<: ocO)
.)tsov EEri i,u'9c 7eg i X>-l
ur '.6< E\
t'l
til
I'
j)
-j
'il :i'I i;
r-i
': r lli
:.i
t3:

CC 12-06-2022
449 of 759
o
Eo
J-
.fog
uo
I
5r-r l+q,
r+
-to
I
clg aaD
f Ha e n99
€ F:
s
r IiilI HBn
= di3 ? Ega 2. ;'.9
€ ; FBT l, dai Ct ad.
3 f* *F
FsfqilE [.9 om := lf,<f,O=-t ) JA- 6='Ho3' >r99 lqq 8E tsB 1f, =. n, f. )r:JN ==
trJ

NOONNNN
€=oE:E
or nE I -:r 333
3Qp.eo?9is;
Ee:H;st:ar F F T.E ; B H n A
g hi?.E FeE8.H
g ;F3i. l=niE3 BerB nEE-83 il. : g3e
: -L --1 93
=:
3 O-a
.L orfi
n0
S
!
!.i.e:-.t.Q
*Tq:d
l+.r301,rc
riErr'-Ef.r8 nfl'
^No> €8;9 tr;c.> 40al
=:E:'\J zo.r<. oeY: o2
Y >6)
A (oC {Jlm C) (, t>€<N)m (c) o)
F
i:l.':
,n Ilil
i!j
,-':i'it.l
:
rli,t.
','-..;::riJ r-:r :..;:l :.
"'i1
t:.
{5r'1..i''J:gi 'i t... ii I :r: i]
(t r.tlrt'!'r
,tll'1"
Fr ,i fr- I't;ii ') i:i ,i, i,!,,',, , l. ''' ll' I r.. ir 1, i;l
'.,s
I-i. aJ i
{t ): (.1,!-'
'j:)iii'ir1;r
. . .'.
'
:
i'.1 j:, :i:
{i-l L'itii lij
e ;il
i r''.tl I tl
i ,7' ::,t\:
!.r r.r I
(:.) fl) .;
'..!is
..
j
i., i
r i. :lrl
\
/r:
i
\\,l
)))t
F
3o,-
€$s=:na d.zi;!';-
i s i€
s
s
u 6d:d,'. a3&
F=Se €EF eo. 5.
a=: c
o,
€
oNo EE; m=(Dzoq o€g 9=to i'i l^ -t o=Es (!- N; (,ts
Co@
iii.:
::.'.1r;lr.s",,-
lxit9
Mtxt
F
19 tp 8+la!
I(! :{iS --i. F+ tilQ
'ihl t+J.lo
.iE,? i-,lA
f.$F
i'$E iF'g :ltr*
iT.is'
'itr
't: :; j :.:!' : '
,.,,
: -i :' 'l
i'!:i:,i:
.ii
rl
.l
i' .,--
,':
,.i i
,l;
,l :,
i;l i::
,. . :' liir:;i'i,i
. : ' itj
lil
'.:.11.tl"i tI
'r;i i:l rr,.',
irt ,''; 'i; ;::i i,
,, . :..; Iij r... i:r
i..i j: :..i ..: I 1,
f.i;
"
i
'ta, '-i
t.it ;.I !
: -'. ' rir
- ;ii
.-tr (t
!:lirl
t'.:

F3
iig
-Jort]J t'fi{*:Eax d'.zI* o';;:
is*€ sig€ ro5-4. d3{:

H=S; SEE; -F ='
j
Fq
jNo x
-o-=
=\D2z m9.r(D Q9 4 -'fi'
-
-L++ 2-6-=<o>< X3-;(o =t ul o0E>tsoIUO)
li
7'ff
,ltiB-,6t
ilg
Jrt
a
t
3 s; lr
t
fo
!!l+UE
TH
sro .-s .Br
Ir{3.
nni
ffi;
I t: :
','- l; I
i'1
_),j
':...
...
- " iti
-, i':
-: irl :.' -:' r.
.
-- l.-r;
.-..
. ii
-_ i:.: ::
".tit
'....: ..i
:: i'i
'.1. rll .,', |-,
',...r{l
.ij
;
:
i)
trl.:.
-'t
1i. i
!ii
i;i
i-. i:j" i
j;l
':l
,{l ;:' ._.i
il j.l' .,i,i:,r '- t:-'.i
:,: .,.i
t
- :r.i
r -; i,.r
.,- !)
rli.,..,t
. i.: 'J-:
:i;
.i,i
i
,' ',.';
t.;.'\,ii'; i
:.., /' :
o
3 F
_1
o, Jl
AJoJ t'Qn o-?o E$93llo d.zi;F';; _3s;p 3dF 353E e=3$ lg!,r=i. OJo 8oe! €EE i:N 5'" -:f 'o-
*c
OJ
€
)Fo -l :o30 JP-zu n!lot q"fi'm f,-{5> zoq< fFgm ^v
4 ..rmc
ll < 'r, Y.l rf, u FO
m NJ (1 Fl-l ts(ozotsH
FJ
'ii l.,j
'"' ti
.r. l-:l ,,
lrl.-r :ilj.t i)
irt
ir.t
L'l
I.tJ
l:i
i.l
1 i.r)
f:i
r;1r)1
l!.1
hi
l.:t
w!9
N
sl
.pA$ $t
E
3o
o
I0riGgaslltr&;
L:.1
"'
i,':
,.:
':::'
i'.1
:0
.tt
l.j
r1i
t'1
r:: ; ... ::Ii .),,.'i|
i'l
I -:t ::l
tit....,.i::.

I i,t
''.i ''- '-! ti.i;at'. t rii
CC 12-06-2022
450 of 759
o1t
oI
-t
otUIo-I
s.
a)o?i
-ao
5 6-fiE^qg F:
r Iit
:no Efi i!:
€€€ E;3 Ioo(llD
p. i' g6
I
t'o
T.

A,
t5'oo,c=. t
0e
,
oI!.
5o1Actoo*
4Er
=
r-i J?oi -A sS ii: H: 'lJ
< fO3-r ) JaJ 63'Yo5'
-r (Xl - Oq .: .. r .. !{> ix> vE ot, !=.Ar:.

J r 3N
wttsONNN
€6:E
P o-E- 9 i.D.Do ooJor-
^16f6= UOO i N (D:r
iSsEgF -f(l)-dodd hiNC=()1sfr6SH
T + BE E
A 5;€**+ :. e3e a-1 ci ?'rD a9
or- oi
q
1b{*tbft
r,ff! q*{i} si lrIt
t
n$
* ^=
[-'o l
E $A
3 d.zl;f
3 s;Ps 5 3E .Nrgo j=. EonPd i5..
t{
j
F
oI
t
iiE;F+ _":a i"ir,.s
i'dL is.i€
Nti
re$ ,ifi iH
i.-1
[] i i l,'irii:i,'r
;t il':"
fl !f,f :
l rl",?, rt i',t, tl
ii r,.il'it ',i
!\ t \. trl, t .,
\ d/"
\ ri:';,r
NOToa > Ol?N co=r u'di'
g
/a d g, C'gle
Ar LMh2Vr5mz
€z6)
--:- :t:t
':= .'jj
'.'. I
ii
..1
t't
,:. I
:iJ
l;.r-)
l
:;>
i.,'
t,,-\.i
'
,1,
,l
t
l\ rl'
i:;:
i.,r
ii
:i
.i i.i I
,!
. ..::
ii
i.:
:ii
I
iir
I
t..i
))))))
F
3t!,-
€3s=:n; *zI;f ';; 3p;s 3d+ hli.E FgE 6N:d.434
H=Sa
f EF sft
='
3:oE- q
o -)N
-o
=Nle
JAzooro oS>-t €>ul< oni
P
5 N
oo\l
ij;,' ::r....1
.r'1
i'i
t'.. :":iti
:i: ,..r f li :,i
,.i; ,.,-i \ji r.'r .tr ,.. i.':
r;r. -:i:^l
tJ)UJfJ
ulF!
It{
FItsIFI
Er3
I.! iil 3
tit d *Q
Lltt
O g,? Lit. tt
{sB W.'til.q8,ffiF
t: .\ Lil
t-j lii "
.E i'it t:
li,-:li
; -: ..._
'in
i''t
!iI
':.i
L).r
:'-_ rtl
^:" \it
;::l: rt
- -r':
'=
r.-.
-- !-i
::. u';.
:
--;-- -ll r.'r
.=: cii
:-':'l
:r: (."r
.::-.. i:,1;
.- iil
'.:: _:,. .--_ f'_-. r'
:-l
.i.*
-i:--l
r,l-.1 ir; rli
.il
j,.i
i ,.t
cn
!
ts
og
!
4 G
q
i
'a!
€o=. o,I
o, od9 --(Dn --oJ
o:ao?11'Y' ga-(Jt-< ('l
m =.c)
o f cb
FPT
5'
o.s-:oco,
oHo a) c9a- !!PZc nEo.za .qs 6) Zm€L ofr9rn< cD Dzm ,a{ 7 gr t
51Nl- rO> so
ll
tU Lir $l arJ
{9 ('t (pto
(F {ir i.JP
$trol 611 l'rotn(9 S".t
tQur
dcl Sur -l
lii$- e igl iiQ -Bs;e :f;; s5*E
tiis
E i; ; lird XS
N
-:1\ ti.rtF
iiiE'
ti) Dc
i!'l
f-l
t.{.tTIti!
?-.-1:
.i:
t:: t/t :l
;.i. ! l -l
t.i] ri, .:;
ltl r.
" l1
''l irt I
.-.1
1l t,\
ll) 1;' I ri
1- .l
li!tiit
I
{;ii
l-r.,.\|
irl
I
t'-'
I
at:i
I
rl
la: r:r
I
i
:i,:t:j i iil;lJ; rr .{ll:i t/-;
€o
€ l't = grr,
€ -i
J
,*- ii fi9r:Ei
H f gig egH g HgrB €EE ,{. iE' : ^i.{
:
= -S'.
- g Fi
cOr
.)Eoz
=Sii Itse.z
= -ga
x :1=-
a=o
S ;;-B >z
9HJ@sk
NON
F(o
iIl
It
:r.
1'l
:l
i__;
...:':.-,

1.^ it,.l
l;I rt i:.. ':t'
r' ;.. i .; il
i-i
-i iri 'i
,i 'i.,1
-. ttr
t.(1,
:iS:. l*.. i-,
.
l
1-':
'
ti;
.,tt r-r.ill
'.L' 7t i(l
. J,-1
i.,.i
L.r
l'r1
I
r:.i
i.',ti(_\
itl
I
I
.ii
i'i .
i'
CC 12-06-2022
451 of 759
g s*g ='
x6'
o
FFiFi i 5ri
F
E eie
3 3 ;€€ s. I Fgf;
$
3 i"? 6' qi=
F=fq 3E:r;.r 3 +P3 9,
= *d:Hr; sS [.9 i;g+ir:a iF *gEpFa g'F * i.i €Eg**a es ds : 93e 5= g j d_ iqf J.A 3 N
=' - 6
w --
e FF
$
o l"t; c lJ^ rb
rn l) '. :r N" ri 'i 6' n' Lr tD,-
^ i{"l >,ti i: , Y-.:-
E f :ir;i cnrlF''ir
o
i.. ,
PO- Y'a) 8A+
cDSa) 98.6 2ca
il11;
t.t '-#, (i'
ii;, tt'tt'i ir I,;i?
Iul r"tsrl
flir'
ilI
$* -:
il$ EEgt
ffi i53€ffi *=*'i ffi:
t-,:i
;r
l/l Ac_
!1
Ia
)
on
\,o
ftr
j::'
:'i'
,t:
t
ti
0 L-lt
oP
(l!
t..t t!J(il (trtiir ir'ri{r (ntsr tc'r.t uJ
mFFifi
ut\tt
rg9
- t...
:-.:- l
^ar,isj
F1o,- ^3 E
t'fiH=:E dz?* Pe SpJP 5B 'e53E q3 Et;= €i il' :
io_
ic
t!,
€
6; aoElJI
Soso
e
r! IlJt
r-r0O
!..,4S
,iF*. dh
ffi
'.[r
,' : r:: .!
r:r. ':. ..: t.'; t'rl: Iri
. .:-
i.C,
,f i r
'.2:
--
tl -l:,1rtl
i,.' l:;'i i::
ii: li: ;t
i
,., t" ;l
1 lil i-l
/:t l:l(!,\.!r!:'
I
t-,
::i N)o
62 o d6'
a=7rd U9
2 cm
lJ1
m
!)'
n.)
oi'r
/;':.:;iI
ij]
il
FIo,
a
eEga:=* F E g'g e d
U 953'E qr=g
Eg;e €gH i=N :.
- .?
oc(!=
:,;i.!
-:
.:
r.!;:i ) tu o -o3 3Ez
E6^9. loB216 <rno . J<a
:r >
z
o0Jl() OF Prn 5m il te^ t9@tsE
:)
I .P
{
o€
lrllY)(9rd;rsit\l
$ln
1"1
tI}rpr6rQ€
3G
---: B !!l
a
,:LQ r.rS
"ir,ft iqc. {I}it iti\l-VQ
ii'r$l.',F
z
m-a
o
z
-
2 uq
!1.!
i,
ji:rl\i
)ti{
t5i
rri0xr
IF
l|l tl
t|l
rs
1n-<-//
F
_3
o)
J=
^r OJ
t 3F" 3* :g(,lXo rR i>=l oI
f 5iE Eg B'rB €E iF'
=
o- =. c
OJ
qhrD
ril
!
S
e it!B
ill Q
i'ir{ ;,s"_vE ls; ir-+i'
?'}'o iRru{ rR:
{.!G rl}l
ii
f.i
trtrr
FrO oaqz3e.-
(rl 4=
Hq
zN@
-I
II
r:5
iJ
CC 12-06-2022
452 of 759
o
!
o
5 !EotrttoI-Js. iiot+taao
-)
6-
fir
^qg F: fl liil Oo* I.Dn do9
E33 le 5 5'cj e ?E; :'o o e6
're f. gd
!,|
0o:oJo:t
-
5'
oCLc:.
:0!
o!3,3ogtETgot
Fvt Xo,J?=r+ o=lri ,- cL ro il ile Q< (>''' :< 'o<fO=- J< J4J d-.9 Ot-v= -r o(t - Ocl H> in> eio ot, E=. or=.JJ-rJN
w.NNOONNN
N
€fD- 1EI o.E- 9 J:irD.DO
iEsI:EiE3E sxds:dFF;i
s 5l.E F g H8.E
g
Eg;3 €gH**$ iE-
= 3=e : a ig j <(D o-g c=' !r oi
'l
ii:! lr-'lrI U.!
i:i (!,i$ r,r i! (ri(!; Uril'l tlt
l9 irts l-t
Hol
t,'l tO rg$
Fl *r arlj ilottn
So :il I
rit.i iie
TJ(F{:rzF Id3. ii16 flib r"t/Cl
;''iS i;Fs' i'P1{ -'P
r/)
r) ' a tr:l [li:
i (J.) I' Ir nl l.
,-,,i.'!i ),.il, i'
lil rl lr
O '.Y r.!l
:il rr )C' .',,1
a)No ..l c9i- 'o:zm
E 6#
6 Jg)3-L 6P*Tg 9E I (o (, JC u|
o a) oF - pmm 5m>
NJ NCD: 6F.l- p<:-
tso otn
b=
l
It
il
I
:,:'
.:l:!
W1
r.i?'i,\ i IrJll i tl,{lit ,t' ,,i ,l t .N ,i r:itiii{l EIO)-
J-
-J o, I-'ol orH9 EsgS;Eq d.zi;f 1r.o SsJE'5dF ;5 *E =:

S t==':g oa=.o
El;3 €sH i5.. :
ra
-<: ocO)
I
{rlIJ(il((r(irirl($fi
Pcnl(l rftre
€
IG
ri'l Sil'! ci iie(-16
:WS
$3. irt8 t-br;YQ '$G-
;]Fe: 'iff'.41J
:::r-i
;.ti
a)lso -Oa ilzm=O 4m
=ut=2-t.o. ;imo '-v<i ;i a) rn >z '' (o (' (ro OF tsm ii 5 m
rilNXtJ@00- F< '0
Ft,F5
ii
r,t:
a,,)1..;:..i..:i.al
r:: i ij .,>-'-
. tl
I:J :l"' ::cr; r ':]
-z 'ii .'i
.,,r
t:> ti::t .i ::
'i: -l:D' ' il
:rt ,ril
\':
i"-'
'
!.r.,
iJ
i..

I
!-'
€(D
3 o,ao, od 9 alD^
-FCD -O= 3:rq l3F P-ul ;=.9
o J@ c.< 9 r"3s
o='_=:oo,
.:
i!lti{ tCl
trl'
711
(:ir
_._. t!l t5t
... cn
l)' --
si5
it l:
l5 qr
tiI
$;A
-,*= Eag
a !l?af -'I"
o
'-::* dPdS !H s53E iffi Ei;= lflF d5.' lrF
j rffi
lPr
-
:.1
t!
)t$o -r :o- >
;996'7 q *6'- fo:'-= 21ct 599>
\mg ;z c ^a ^ n-) i )v I rm
sm\,^\, CD )cr
Itscoots
(jl
,.,'l
i:'! r.l
'i ',
i' .J
ii
\(.t
"
l..r (crlir {;tlsi r.u
(llyr
1:i t0,rr^$
*Fv1
Fr('t rr(G € ii o .D iv
€ E:= 3; ^: ; $ t'ql o,3o
i E$93;rqI g.zI*:;,o! FF;'g 3dF i s5FE *=38 i' to5-f.6=& i FFst tEE :.'o.
i<. 'ocg
q
l:- :,
' ii
''
] ,.:l
i-' iJlJ! \' -. -: ..
-Ji'' 1 i; ,'.'i
"
t:.) r tl
t-.t ,::
:l'
'
il
';l i1
!-1
iHZE '#R?
i gE* 5T?x
>
j3
sg
i.l
:-l
::l
t).1
::
(l:)
iilt>ii-,
c'
i;:ll.' J
i..t
.'
CC 12-06-2022
453 of 759
o
!
o3t
otr
UIoI3s, rDOl

3. o
J
3o
HEa 99.

F:
$ Iiil 5Hn drt9
Ef3
=:5 €€€ ct= :'o aD arb sd. g'?
IoT't.o,aJ='
oCLt
o(I
ofotETgo€
s E$
g
' ilg rEF €r ii
-JE -i.o*=. FOf,-rvJ '3 -r0Q Jgq
d .;
" J
"
o !{> i^r>
=
ett otl
d E=. or=.-J-
=-rtN 6W(D'N
=.No dsN
o- E- o(D (uo, ofu -N(D qH E
\o=tu lvc= ?do
H P.E XiE F=aOI
=J l.?o
() 't.(,:,1 ll '; .l l, t;
r {U ,rr
,''l ,l, i'; .f' .r'
'
lil , i lli
l: 1al .l ( )
t.il
F
3oJ
-
^3 E
€ fi{= :E i.z?-F or
;
F F ig ; d 33H'1e:1 EI;: €E il' :
ra
5 c
tu
€,/
-mm
ozo
lv{!!
ov
il.i
li) t'i
ja!:t
iIl rt
rF
tf
t$'F
r{s (x:l
E
lG rflS
,-1iA i.Qt.:tb-r:rIB
1a. :F
i'is tif!( .-.t+
-.'F6t ts
)(
L\'
..1-i (ii
.-i]l ;::r'.-:::
',.
:- i',i ----L:
rll
; ,tl rI
ir
)
n
E

1. 1
r:: . t)':. li
r, '''-l
|" -:1lr1 :1 .,l:
a;
'-l r
:i"
'ii ..-i: .!
:ij :.jli;' ti
::il .:i'!r:i
:: ;"r
-::-.
t:-:-. ltt
,+ fJ
=l :-:: fi,
-.:
- l-'
::- "r
-:-'i'
:-,
i-ii
\,
it
{
J.J
i!
ii,i l.L
,f
\ t>Ea
i,r'
,' .'
ilJ
i':r
t
rl
t.

FO)=-
.4,
*'f;3=:Ta i.zfl* e;;
i E i€ e
s
H t5='!g oa=.o
El;3 €sH +<N L DcL =' ro
ac
o,=
t:.'. : iJ:;i i ti!.
-
.:t:
t-r; (. ;i:.-i i-r l
r:t .c ;:;
:::
';i -li.rl;^1 il:i: -r.f'::i t
I j:i
l:i
If!
:.tlil'ja!'iltl:a.il-)
I
,\::;
:iji
t:i
isl'.(i t:l(ttrFlrd!'tr!.t
rslr
i'6$ rt' r;t'13trrlouF
tr4'^l gi"
€*
Io
5 t{.F iF.F
IF'8k.
t'ti
.{brrbr{* t&i ri*r
sr
iilL!'Ji-t
!-1
t..l
t.-i
l.!.;i--'
I'll
P
r.oo
I
|{tr'Sl r{{$Wr
I
u)
f{
rlJ
(}a
F
0Fa
gIts
(D
F= .o,
-
l- -o
tfi{*:Ea d'.zi* 1:r.o FE$€ EEU Q5i.E;E.8
El;3 €gH i5.. :
ro
ac
tu
€
o6It
:tsq*EEE=J >_5-9 r-: L6 !E-=c i' i 3c
-{ tH
U:
:..
--:: i''i
--- r"
-
--
r:i'
::- i'J '- ,..\
:.*-: i '
- ({,\ .'..
:;:-
::.-.- L,.i
I
--- *.:
.--, I
.--.. 1 i-' - L..l
{::r
;:j
li,
1::
iit
-lr-r
l
.i' ."- I
'/: ltl'
li ._. . :'
--i ..t il
-il.. l:l
i'1 -'i! _ll
-t \'1t
:
;; ,: :';t^i .*
i.i:, -ji
.::
fi:'lri
'r..,'
']
i.r
ii
€aI
(!,
-L lan
^r
g
-
S '.j en or*9:

EdES jAq: d.z?-* 9r.oi SsdE'tdF:
b 5 *E E r g$
Eg;3 €gEl =<N
L C .Fo. j'
:
<: (]-co,
l6nEIz
)
)on)o))J
r'lir):l'r'
i !t
iit!dh,li{llir
rif
iErurIts
ilf
Frr$ti
$TD
E
+sosa
a
o
Itt
ln
E
ant:$*'
1- i:i
t ,'.
...
:. ,i;.: l-'
-:r'
.. .-i i-.i
:-. tt: :al
:: [/i lzi
: t ::i1
i t-,, l:l --": l!] .'i gr.r
:.
"
fr,
-__ I
- !":.: I
PO T O3:D N?> 9?;2 F;' x (,5< ('dc mO2
ZnNC
st .,ka
-.
::- iI(
_
t;t
:,.1
CC 12-06-2022
454 of 759
o
?
o:'t
otrUIo
II

3.J+!,ri
-ro
J
eg
i fia
e F:g
n Iiil
s 3aI fr ;*3
F :E i
N EEt
f p.i'
a 96 {;
Fs
=.+ d= il$ Eg emS E<f(D3- )- JA- 6='Ho5'
-rGl JOe Q> i*r> urU ott E=.6,=.

JI ).a3N
wNOONNNN
€o1EI --!- P r f 6-an;
^rP-9orc rf a=:aa*i*3F3F:au**s
gisE g€EEEE
i5.' : g3e
: a .-q3
=:
3 O.a c=' 9f oo
lr
ll'
I
rl
I'i
i
J,i
U'
1 I
()(l'
.l
()
t6
tm7
-'
N)o
5@co
-a:;;' i'- : ir
,f. "- i-1 ';- itl -, ,:
..,''.'.'
:!. r,.i l;l
i
:.
,-: l'Jir!l,,r
l/ itli'!
. '-- r.ll
*:-- rc*::.-. j.il
zl/)
a)vrn
x
@E
I
NtsPNJ
:
1l
i,i
\\"
W .-1.:,
'.i' ,il,l
l"f i'l
F
*1
o,
-
ei:i:q* EpJP 3dF h5lE FiE Fs:*.p.ig Hgnpa iEs iF-
=
--
3:o
cOJ
1l
oNO i-o- Eqz m!:o rq"6'
-J-zoq o€Y oz>a) (om8ZFgu)- N?
u l\l
@o
trC
f
2 G
t
z
c
c
j, f:i r-i
t-, ! ,,. .''' Iri!
.i,.1' ll
r .i. rt!r .l
r,: !1 t ii :: .::
rrl':, i '
:.,: ,ii
"
ID
',:1 ri l
i't
'i.t t!
. :r
: r ')l
ti .t
'"' {tl
..-.'
..tt
ii

1. ,1,
':, i r::; l' !!:ri ::i r:i,
| ?t ::. ,i) :-ri ,: i,
|):.!l
ii'-
I
;L1
..,.i
i tt.,l.i il, r Itl
l_
:.,i I j !i ',i.I1
:
.,;:li
":
.rl
ili
r;.i
.!,J
,.J
i
:li
.:ii
...- ,!!
i.!
il
, .. i.:i
i I'
.
-:t
j. ;;t
. - ia:; 'I iti
'..

I '..
.,ti
F
a io Saito
-g :Eg*:EIE
fif igi€ cigE
H$ Hl[3€E€;Hl
& sF'-
a -i rli"+ i tr.

E
(.)No<FE*E 4"fi'= -)-- zo!> o<22 o) 6 >r.l
€ (l)mb 3z ? EB!
o- lr,
-
(JI F
!O)
t'i
):'
I
'''
"l :i:.i::r ri
:..r', --i'
I
' iii "
ilJL:irl
i,i
.-i r '':
11t.iI t
'j: it; I .l
;r', ft l li
.-r;-L
l..ii,.!!;ii::)i:j-:..(ili
I.

L.i
€o3or-
-L l-al
^r
E ^ I l-'o:o ordPi
EdES t;q: d:zi* Pioi Bp;'P ?dU;
b 5 FE d s B{ El;3 €;H: :a<N L c A^
-o-
-?: oc!a
x9, Co z !-.1 c0:* gQ at P+tr <om mloo
9mv>
zg6)
t/1'o
mv
z
l-i
.:?
i-: l,'t iil
::: t:. tt
,li' ll -i ill t_] ::
!t
..,;
-. -:.:.-- a^r:: "'.:. .t:1:_ li:
-..:.-::-
:: ?,.!
-il- ',
.-:- |
.,_ r; i
--'l:'i:. ,r:,
:.: I
l!.;
fi:
i.ll.'l!:1
I'i
i,
, i,-: .l
i-i
-'i t;r -l .'\-!:i
"\'l
:It rl ;::
.:. t-; ,l,ir;5 1! li;:Tr ii,
'l.i ! /:
lrl ::., 'i'
tlr-li;ri-J
CC 12-06-2022
455 of 759
I
IJ61ii$\J
sF{TJ s tr€
EEilI
3 ;i€ s.
a F[[
$
s E;6' rdl
FrJ?=.+ oi l/IA .-cL of pe 8: vmS 'lJ
< f,O3-r ) Ja- 63'Yo5'
-r OQ J Otl .1..r.. q> i,r> uE ott E=.^,=.
= J 3N
wNOONNN
€(!1sI o-E I rio(Do a:l E^EgE
e E$l ;E ggif SpdP 5dF5os ;;gE =:Hlo;6
Ei;3 E€e*a+ a<N L olrD 5o.=J-r
j d- isr3
< "E
Ot LJoJ oa
P
g3rDaS t!1 +
iftiJlIP
ad
.$G':ih !.Lqa:t'
itH
o
a
NOG'orm$2V s*
E vt=4 -15\J !!9>
rz>
^ a') i-mc
mx
@?
a
P
_.1P
N)
l1.j
l1
I ) 1..rr I
'lr
l:l
L
i ttt't"
( J ')
ll i" ';;;".
,i'
i :i.,'
I'
: ,-l
I r:
.:t-'
:
=
\'.1
'-'- i ';
.:.-"- 1..
--- i...:
- i'
.._,
l:;
'-i
-
r.l
:;: ,
'-? j.1
:-::-
'
r
.r\.r:.t!,l; ; :: il
;-l i ;.,;,l:
'l) I
I it
W
r'l
r'! i:i ,}t.:
ll
I
').

I
i
t'
ii1:

I
rirrr
f${t*r.j r$
rp
G' rttr<l.l 6. ro€
Al= rt; orl
rJOt
t fiH* :E d:zi* o'r
F F ig ; d c5i.E F=
-N"la1 Ei;::€ jr. iFt
:
;( <. oc
o
o
I
FG uil ftia
'5I I-ato
.i:di.b!f-:.
hsqt hFseht*
...o! ..F
i:l
iiiu
\,'ir..ji'-.:.
i.J,,,,
"{.1 L{.1
NOo- 5?coF 6Y.gEI Vr= -l rt mo <5
mzIt1r)vmm
@EItstsN
.t:'
-l
.,,-.:,r
:l' .r-: " i
i)]'i'ti ' --;::Jlil lti::-j
i:
'I "r
'tl
"?
l,'l
r") i-. t ii
:.1 .-: i:
,i 't:t
r.'!
'"r
L'.
::
i,..1uJ
!it{!t
I
ir]l(,
I
i-'
I
},J
i:.
[ 'F--rr.l j'(
u j-:
(9to
g ltj gu..J f,u
Nu 1P
€o
3o)^ jdf; sd 9 i lrDno r6grE 9=.ol YIiNC
AHTE
*
=.
8dE <*.- ci:'oo= c.< QP p9t- Lo
JJo-
<-
oc!rq
NO(1 or- lz>
:6::.=
l6=i':
'-15-: imoi ,<ix )m- >z
= R36
rmFlr \rx!ct
co r- P<
Its
5PF
/+
s
fn
ro -f
t'Q r EsgS t.z?. *
-3x;g 353E t.oor:.j. Irnp3 it.
i'j
i-r
,.t.j:'
l,.i t-: :ii
l,'i r:-i-' :tt
;,r :'
'
..lr
Vi .i r:
l:. i(t1j :tt:\
CI
C
c
T=
2 .-. ,,(l
,-|
::t:-'i"i
.- r-'
li
7vlf'
DA"i!{.)H'JF,Fffir '#
ffo
sOf
o
€o
IoJ
Jl
€39*:Ei d.zI* o,;; Bpdg 5dF
e 5 *E *= 3
E rot-3. d jQ gEpS €EH ixN :.
-
<:o.
co,
NOO- O)? g0: ga (nJ -{ cr P9 m
z
r)v
mm
xTD
-
I
'Jl
tl l"t
"' Lii_:-: .. l:- r',
:=-..
:l
.i
". i;l- (i-:
. -.-.

I
:-:. rn 'l; i-'
'I- r
:.I
(i;'
i--.
'
- .:l
)!l .. tii
rr:.- :"
t:., "l:-."1
l,.j
'il.- :...1
::il .: t'.
... .!.. :, 'r' .- i il
:rl;-.:i(-i ,z::
:Ti :'l;;.
,:..j
CC 12-06-2022
456 of 759
)
:lg
u,(9-bFlo
(9
)
l,tl
xl{irr
3F
-?b
=r f-oi
+ i r:ifr;o _u ?/rttl
=t
t >n-{ ?- ollaJ :i rH:u :11 nrn::
:k'
H
- -l fil'J
=
cizt>
:*.il'trt+; obrn I rn 7tg2Z 3 ,.-t gq3f.l
- T *#!g +; Evr
=ul ul :- tg j&
: drr
'=l
-U
5 $
arFo cQr=:E F3sFN5 fitH4
zHXH111
ro
ul6grIIP
(9
o
ow
ForN
N
l..l2 clnF uFm
Y:n-f IIl'nt=r- ir:srn ftiZ
h *l tr *l C;:D,J rl . '17| dL''l flt7:E silu
F
"!fn ;9 i.r:P gn
In
ulurg
UIeld
.b
'\, ,J
murotO
*
tu{\ll,.l
I
e$ol€
u
I
FItr
I
h,$
E$AH
ETgg Bo
z
En
a
Ha
=
lsZnH
xH
T-rp rrl
=-rJl
=!q ir dr:-
! + .=li.t *,I siin
o 5:- F.'n-l ur
: a $l :r1t= oo :-ll r!{P
=u
d'll'a
.,
= '-l m'-l
m
= 6i!o :.aF
: * rr.'Ul=r
sl;E
=-..i sr:u= ,.i s:srn= 'i xifnn €rp slln
a
=*
t'r
3 ;-F u, -00 \- 3, 1 Fr -:F gl -=ot
\
:-=l
N
liJ
N
Jl
lffifi
i{l !0f'u llJ
aror.) ci>a2= an.D n 3s9 6g= eq
m7vt m26m(1o
Itu!f,{fl$tldtrlr
s
tr|
l*\,lr
\ 1
I
7)
m
fll
T
('.

J.
l;;;l'{( t'
CC 12-06-2022
457 of 759
(
I
-s
o
--a
=o!
o-N
onoI
I
o
o
-o
E
3 o
5e,+
Ett
--aCI
0,
Jt-F
aa
-{o
oC+o
J
6'w=. o- -o-lvtOo-l p
I
oooE
-J
oI
Jr+!
o
-3-ac-l. *taa
I
!
I
N) NJ
O
N)
I O
OH
r)
o
33 g
5-at+
ocr+
-o
oc)
J-
ltrg
33 o
--ao
Ut
-{(lJ
q
+FF
CC 12-06-2022
458 of 759
oo=<o coo JFI.l,
fJ-a J- rl gtl Oa g!9 11 qg 9ii!? *
0, ct ?t
(1o
*=a,6?tsCLCL-o(tIn
o9
!
o,
I
r.+c)
T'
o
r+(t
qF!gqg nqSlAF-
ci.= s -i
=
; ; E ;;.=: nB33.s; r5=a> N)o'+f -oN 6JD Coo) -rp
5 F€3.
g
t.IJTUTVT.;F ooooo-o oF!n(r(Jr- (,O{Or5F ots(x(.^)rro PzggnS =n(D(D(D 4d555= (D:==fv :d333t=.onidrdA'l 5 3++9P
I
8s=o, - -:.==c0)=.! €$oo) AEgFr<vtq so
=Er3ds
3tr5 dSF Es;g
+ afrblrP f a6; -o .3 g;F ts r$d'3s J:.r+.o I8.q
*
?'D ? _-
o=i6
==0rF} Be= <ct3 Ito
o= !t,
Oo
€! -=
o
-(A
PD:P:EPe T-----
+====== +t1111111r ,^ ro (o ro ro (o x55555
-lJlrFrlJlJ Sooooo *@0000@o xooooo )7LoLD(xu)u) 6ororo)orol ,^ (o to to (o (o X(o(o(o(oro XcD(x(r)u)u) Sooooo ^ooooo :YF\Fr|l|Jlr ';:555ss d!{!{! ,- (rr (.'r (Jr (Jl ur Y: N, N) N) N) N) ':s5555 &;0o0o@0o@ ,..5(JtcDNu 6(J)O\t(ON)
5'ge*( ?j(Dc)
-?J- '<+8IU rto-o v- Fi .tr
- 6'6= -ag crOJ 0r5f/l as
o, =' 3. 3.=o
ctb.E=o831=. Bdeg-tr
= o=
-i ltc
E€o<aB' e3. 8Solr =e9.> .E
-t
Fts9r
CC 12-06-2022
459 of 759
L OEmur t:t- sss
s
s s ,\
o
lol f,l ts Ir, f\r fo
€
Jo
r)o!z
)
VtvtooeCL
d6VtaqtttoroNE
@tn
v6) r)vrn
l!NCtr
I(A'
s,o
cDtJrooUr o@zI-mIF
nc!m,t-{
o=.ttout
o
5Itu
olv
at
o=v6)zn
(t,
m
IJ, l\tO'l
Iu,
5Ioch5wogr{u,
Vtmm2Vt
t1
Ftnmiri@
€
0 n
c'9mv,I2oo
rOglo
AIN'
o
tn6I
oI
z
3 -{v
cItt
{mrn
Ftn{t-
(1, lvo:

It,
5IoAI
TV<t I,l O) wvtmmztlt
f.!
vmfnxG'EI
nc!m3zoa1rot,o$IN
o
Or
f''l-Inz
FG'2x
F-{4
(1,
N) ctl
I (!
AIo
Or{Notr5t^-tmmzVt
nFmtni\@EooC1' m32
o
t-l
(ouroJ
5INJ
oor
il3qt
mEzIm
zN!
vo!mmvt =-
5vt n(1,w
Or
I lt
s
<)
{5J
ooozImzNq,E0
r)cT' tnz=o
n(Oulo
5a tu
NOror
€t?r =v(,7'
6'ro2l'.@rot5
v,
nt-(1,N'
or
I(,
sIo{
oo
z
ImzN@I=
nc1' mv, -to=
o
@ttoJ5It\) N
Or5
ttt ,A a att nf.)nn l-l-rlCC 12-06-2022
460 of 759
b!
,o
0 0€no
)
G
aitjciotrl
"oF
U
L
oog
Eo
=, -C?o
<)
F€AFc\<
lc)
t'l
tDo:t
tho
6{D
x(tr
.1
(
:f
o=!teo!t6
E-2', 8/l a!
o
Notr
Ieo
6c
otEsT' g
nottcot+o3
66 s9
N
{
&(oto
r.o
,t
E'
ITri)
l$. J13 )tlEc
l! rr3 {d 1
c}ccr3F
Ggt
€
blDG
Irlot.DF fi!E
ofande.y Dr
pAlB ezuv ao
N
{
C'I o3
ea
:Ein
-rH
p.,"tg t
@
p/\l8 Ezuv ao
s
rn! rtCJ
lJ 1il tn I
F'l
LJ
(Ao.Dt/Ec)(D
o
eclE
CC 12-06-2022
461 of 759
tb
I(DISl..i
lslo'ls
l!alpl!a
lsIOl:. lF) l<l=la
q,o
Jts
Ol
lWoN) N)
mlJ< arf oFP o)-o- -<vt =.=or )i(I|a o:-to=o5 ^6ixr W=@ 6oS E;5 (,^)o (J.) v!To,
=. J
oEo)
N
o,
v
tDCL (o(D
ott3o)oc
E
o
-)='
o
0oo)-z(D.
oa
J
5o
-
a<s.'< E3
-J6(D
g.e 9edcm
=mYo- 30o=
p-J oJ=
f,oE
Cnc
6 =' .+ id
ge- EOAE
nto
gs
J ) ooO< €Eo='
-o) pp EO) q$i. uo f=OO'E
g.

J
oar)
o)o
-
.+o
s6F
==E
P
o B+B-
:-g=.o6'
=' o= EOA 8p8.s Eo
O, .+ 5'( vto
AE-
) r+O
o9€vSTJ ^o) (Dr+ oo-6OJ .+o
a-6gco EJ8eJFt=' o) )gq; ()o=5.+ J
- 50JE

3.8 )J 5-< Ovt (D(D f.=
= o.r sa
9ol od
J=oof cL <.
=' r+ J(D
og
(ocL> (.rl =' Ft B8 [ AFi:+ r _<-6
=cL 9:-'
EL or J5
o-+t
=t .+< 6$<5' ord9
!55'o SP- oPo: EXE=
oa(D ='J r:9(o=' loo ?tt t'/'
oro .+olJc) o9o) (Jlo)Z.+
0otD> f6- F:f oa) @c ZccLO {3o5' soIq"t a*
='(D o^oy8.+
oa
-{€o3ood.)0qVto.t-oocaao.+=1oJoog6-olno, trCL 0)
E
N=NoNl\r
o
3 r0i!o
0t=oFP(1,o0,
3 o,
=CL
€o
CL5oaCL0)
E
=_: lllltlvoN
N
o
3 ulino
E
3o{(^)o
!t
3 o=o
o€
o,eo3ood.

J
qa
oc.+
J
o
Poc)o)oo, :'
-og
oVt t.o
Jth
E'
6-
o, t,
oCLo)o
)(Dth
o, ,+
o,+o
c)o
)
o,o.+
3 fD
=)(D
cr(Dt,a+
m)CL
o
3 {5i vv
'oEi
J*\
wo
T
aQ.
-!r
o
!
ToT'
oT+o
J^
Ft-c)
J\o
t\) ul
I (Jl ol
oI@T' Oo q)q N)+
o-tr l:l 'o\OO
UF iox
F$@N)NF
--+ (D=' ioo.N
-C)!
&ro o55('l N('r ??Qo i- o. ct:l atu
o
o(ct3
e.
oo:t
CC 12-06-2022
462 of 759
\ J L
DeAnza Ventures, LLC10122 Bandley DI. Suite A
Cupertino, CA 95014
siamp
Address Label
CC 12-06-2022
463 of 759
6tl9998t0# po^orddy eleg cluorlcolS
e? 8vz9 Lvto 0t66 9t08 0I?6
|il]il||]il|||il|ilill
# 9Ntvcvur 3unrvNels sdsn
/96'"M6T6 VC

NOSIUUVO ISV
S
UtC
N\n-t3-lCCt1l,trgt
c']'l682 Noe\ JouSrvM
:ol
dtHs
?t0c oSulnoSu 3unlvNeF
9000
euuey\l :#Jau
ZZt L EO :a1e6 tuaa1p6 popadx3
2990{99t6 VC ZlNllUVm
2991. xo8 0d
311
S3lrU3dOEd Clllcvd AVS
1,1OCN3 ,I93Ue
ruAvq-], ]lvl'\l AllUOlUd
899?6 r.uo.{ p3tlehl zzoztg
uoBeu!uuoc
-r 'r:,. dihFiiro arnleuols ,OlV.d,39VlSOd'S:n
^u3erqrrEr ::._.i.. --..: 3CVISOd Sn
r€61 6roo o00s 8l. ro sr srzs zilo oe66 eeos 0}'6 .*.llJ odlqs-N-rclrc 'm
a
Y
X
ao
5 oooasp
ars
= yse g 'At Cl { 60 =
; r:.* h z=z * l-.te9 o ,oc6
5 549 U'
EE* ! o=c)o ac r<l
9€oo9' r*I3t Qo -re
#aQs -lo
o
P
a! eFtrotx!r= to: oo'a
goo
o,
oooo€o
!
o
ac
CL
ooCL
GI
oo
9 6'BFB
F
E3; xo = ii t;; Fig
Eiv os=
eE: diOD"=a
*
o CCt o.o o
E g; 188 o o.= o'-d
3:a . v<{o
c*
o.<ri
€ €,8 i sEag
s 6d=frgi;g; E$3g€
3 so 3--F S3.5 g€!
83*8. F'Be 3E
. iLE
6 st
AFo=g<ooec=.; dHJ-qEoo9o
ro=
:io!6o4qE3oo
o
:
0 QoxI
zIcn
J
6'
@t-qlEg.
noo
o.|
CL
(0
5Io9. o€E1s)= 19o (oC) (.ro olcr i' lj5rt
;gNr o"
5Cr,
EsgSf <6v r= q q00Y' \d at al !l :t! ooQd
"
Eo
Oror6(ooo){5
{
#e€
g
-*9€!5r
,if@63H
oo4@oo
ot ';- rl No il :Db El oa
oooo
ooNNooNNNN
oo
{N
olu
N
1ta3
F3E9 4xitsFX6= N 6, ar llJ Qs66
$ Ee or .It QM6no)+ $Er
5 voi8ao-o
-{o
$qt -5mG)?V >xc, 4i9 aino9Ee f)zB >o(o E'F Eoot(oO) {
=-3; g*s B€I
Eqa
E3{ 6'O<
F*E86E 500oo 6 o-o
E#g c6.

EF+393=-o
6 i.B1 5EB=€6 9 d'o 3qaor{ =9r Po!aF*6 oo8-?
I
$Nl
T HIE
tsls
Es\q) c^5 5x- E: ei 33
FEs9!=@sdrSS BFE; ESEE;8b6?so\SE
oq
CC 12-06-2022
464 of 759
C
a!o+0t
o
45 GI
6 J
Do5:clzc3It6(o5o@oC.) O) a0(o(toos{OlNs@5qt
a<6\€g?a
oooo6ooD
q=: c!r
D@oooaoir!
oD
3 Iod
=
-{
N
o
NN5.

Tz
P
o@@s,{oo3{o9.
e
oo
tt,
!
o{ooa:
o
!a
o

9.ogo
EFA
>i rr, o:: o >5=
€P5o: td ii -e riD
==CLdC0,
doc
o
e0o
e
6lFFgc
E
cooo
!oooc,
go.l
i{Do5
a
T6
o
{
<o-;ce i8-i Y5BEe Soii
3 ;526zd'o;>o69
Eg
o
ox5zo
o
o
o{
v@
c
I
o
z
omz4mv
=>= !di PeigEii
$$i
=9 €E3
ggi 6el oe{ mc: o!s5 >dN
-@dn,60 6i IIt6P6€mzImu
oo= P€ ELat 29=
obP >ti3I @Ps€r E;3 lr! 9go€mzImv
>3da.9obBo!s 2-
f. il
dE
g
=t
-{
No
P
t
a
z
oamoIa{4.qjoz
o
mzImv
<c
43ZiR3 'e$
9L$a
6'
co!C"+ooE5
o
!E6
o
t
c)sBait
I
o
:03o
o
x
{il!o
@o
+oox
ooEE+oF! xs;9.ool.o30do*e6a
z'
-o='
:.
oa
<30= : >qo
d=31 ;iit 98='- 6 0::a
P QO
=
<.D 6 0t
s a5gdo_6o6o
:

N4z
P
o!DIt
€
.2o
€7
oooo
FD
53oa
?6
sat3I
)peqpaeJ
CC 12-06-2022
465 of 759
_) L
DeAnza Ventures, LLC
L0\z2Bandley Dr. Suite A
Cupertino, CA 95014
$amp
Address Label
CC 12-06-2022
466 of 759
l(a
to
IS
lslsl!a
l3l!a
tsl=.Fl=lat=
q,oN) u)
NoN)N
SeNtq)
E I fi s# i H
=E
e' -6- 9o9 AO:t
Y pflS E." Ol -* sF
IN
7!T
q,=. )o,
3,
o,No)7
oCLoo6' E3o)
oc
E
oa.
o
Io
o,o
o
@
99 oo= oor 333 :l.D.<
r-
=:r.D^r 3$d jr3fle9g gqig
ii5= tJooar+-<
e-E_i* sed $e t-.O, ov'-
=oro =,QF 3g
a y3€ 43.;
-Aor.+ 1 <o-\+6oolJ{6Ear)
q d€ 6:;' gle q, d't 35q ,+-=' ooJ ,+5(-) Oc
I rx fD oiif
9<
g5:J C@-r
it
J
oclnT'
v,
J
CL
6'o,olh
oo)CL
q
ot
aanJo
GI
ooCL
q,CL1h
cto)qqo
coCL
oO r( :5=t J3 Y 6-
\
J
=:o F -.-.4
-
r. ; t3 ;6-@;oo- g?E J'o.l
lu*= =a€ 5s*
='qa 38.6 F;F CL ,+ gt
: q';
-9oqr (aor: r<-
(D :iorts r+=lC e':
+ 9F9.

E: 5.?
d. Idt=. 30g.<3
i'(D= -\-. 6(D* '€a
ort 3(D t+- 6gcL cL Ot^
89"tr9roj 14o
-o9=JO
€
o
J
o
E
o
th=r
=o.
tog
€I
o=o,v,oo
g
€
A'
.ct
g
oIt4.ott,
=)
oEFolt,
fl\
wo
!
oo
-tr 6'
!
ao'cto
f-+o
J^
rt-c)
rn=CL
o3
J\o
t\) (Jt
I (Jl (Jl
o3@'o Oo oql\t -t
o
l:i 'o\OOSF\bxs$O t\)
NFa
o=' JOclN*o
*3o$5 (Jt N(Jl ?qo Qo
=. o\ E(Jt -r N)
o
o(o
3 e.
ho
5 CC 12-06-2022
467 of 759
r
9000
eupey{ :#Jou
zzgaeo :aleo,ta llao pelcedx3
to0z-tz9v6 v c't-t I H lNvsv3ld
VMAUNSSM3UHS I'
r{ooN3 v! 03ue
8t0c o3urno3u
z1J
3unlvNels
clu ouol- t3 980?z
SSVHC NVCUOI/\J dl:or
tSeon ee=u9 dtHS
ll ll lllllilillilt lilt il|l|| | il]il |||l illtl
6tzggggtgg penolddy eleg cluorlcolS
vzrte99z6 vc stllH vNnevr
# 9Nrycvul sunrvN9ts sdsn
LZ9Z?8 L?to 0t66 9t08 0!?6
ruAVO'Z lMW AIIUOIUd
ez9t6 uro.4 pol!ey\l zzozlvzlto
€ssz 6100 0o0s 8l.ro zz szts ztlo 0e66 t€os orto "**j":
. ddsdac otvd 39vlsod's:o
::.. .,-..'j-: ,:
uo$etlllsuoc
arnleu6!S
^u3
ateu lelJ
39VrSOd Sn
@dlqs-N-rclrc 'm
a
ooao
o
a.
o
aE $
= !se
g
dE
g
= lE.F A
==z -i l-.tgg
o rcd= f e@
o
EFF
oo
.<
=. oll 3gooo'
8FzdQo -raiaQs -l.Do
!.,
r!o6
Itotx
or= (oj o!, 'E
goo
CLoooo€ql
t
!lac.LooCL (ooo
9'
9 6'kFg
$
E3E iiio
Fig
lDie v0r= g8: aiO!, ga3
o tr(o cLo o
?3; E88 o cL= o--dr
E E3F 62. -tO
c*
P
O. r< = -| € i€ 3 3'Eag o dd=
fi1F;*; EF o r^ o g3€
r
g.o 31F33,5 g€!
Re*B'?'.qe 3E 'o.tr
6 !t
AFo=g<ooCLE
=.; dHJT
^qr {(ooo9o
(o3r
:FO 6'd
qr J. ct ?t 9o!t
o,o
o
o
r!zIU,
J
€'
@tA' ct9.
no
oo
-
CL
(05oQo€cr* ora o=jgo (0() oro o=
o --' l3501;qs:crr "N{
Esg3d <Ov-; I Q.00:', \daio!tltoodd
"
Eo
oooo)
sN@oo
a! €' .i'
P€;F861r='o =aoo=@9Jq

9.6 NO@@oq
oo@@NN5519N ooNNNN
o' III
sg
6:.o
uo
o
oo)
N@NoNN
;l
'nd
5 f;;fr -a+a >ff<
iEE +@0
:Eg
a; o1N
6 rsoo{
ao:
o
=. o
-{o
-TNG6 > r 5'Ir:i QrsS<fi
= He8
; !9x - 9.26 'a d9P 9AE o -m No) Or
?oN
5 2)v g{e B€I
,5 qE
E.3 a'
=idq
F+a6Ci oa2co oo -od =.E io<- EO' [5+ 8.3
q
o i-ozo 6'?*1 8qEoy o@l-=@d 9d! 366-o
.
6-il
p 6'i.

F*6 F03'2
6'o
ilN/>$ Rtcsr Hl3
tsls E-{ \q) (h5 5x
EXsi a6\)Sr€
b9!=Cr)
S
drss
BF' E; 3SsEc! cDO Bat ?s
Sq
og
CC 12-06-2022
468 of 759
t?
-o
tcltct
oloo
d! [
9,fl s I F
6 e 5 BE ia =s<
ag irf, *.= P id> e. o9
qrt ;oro1o 3; 6'> TOO.+;i<;€oca:ttoooo-oo
A
!o
t
o4.oqooooo
o
6(o(oo)o
f
o
!c)
o3.
(o
oo
3 I
oolololn
F
ooo
rO
:.rt
o
6Ulo3m3@FT,o
mtq
>Et dl tfr3; !4
stQxqG E_€fs33 z d !! o9 " E=aT5H ".a d€? t 3s$ N
-ow
- qi" Nq
CC 12-06-2022
469 of 759
c
@
!
@
+!)
o5t
@e
{Io-o5o!
0o
-o
o
o
+
EEq
t[o
=s9 -?ts d t: dxi is o. E:r -o
=.
=CLdcg
!oa:
ae
*iEo
eg
E{ EA
9?
f;3
F?
cAo
t=ozE3ro(o5oooooo@ooo5{@NOlN{
cat
!@
Iooat
o
!c%oEo
6'o
6l e6'
olo{ s36!q r=' >E@6 oqc^P;
aa9.o3ooetsoi3{
E
otg
-o
o5FG)cz
I
6 o
oi
t
o
3to
oc!Aooo
cFm=gctn
oo
!
aooE,go
e
{Eo*t6;To
,:l
E3tE e.8
E€ F
Fs
Fgg
f;EF o+:
483 st
I
-qF
s
E
2t2
oI
{!
6cjo2omz,
;g5gt EqFiilF6Ei.H 8r'r.P FOsn
Asg-s d{{d3edg7eas'n
E
93 I
5 5oc3Etr
;
JtI
a
tC
EiF I s.ts
.r $F
tth8"5
3gE ir-ts
5En >@!e O'N q3- B I! 2 9gt :Fogo<z!
Egt3e^o gE€
I O!t ara i€5E 1:9do5i
F5r f;g: <E-O
gFF3ddE 3:
epo=
zIu
982?6e3a:t86:lr98
S€z
n
:iE8;835F
9sg E3: d329.H.
i
n
n-$I
o0
oI
t
6cJ2
om
zt
g5FErisg$ ?iti6_ t3 E3;
9Eg€zts
$gF Et-ts
i;$leB
;gE od
€
co!@tEt€
!a6
P+
<B-dB >*
E€to
Po
!I
II
I
I
!
i
t
EaIII,
rI
II
i3ttilt9il
5 33ts
B
o
,e
x
TAqFI
CC 12-06-2022
470 of 759
)
{
o
o
o5
C)
o
oeo.qt
1 tfr=

36.=e*69<doEc- 1e0-
E8
d='[email protected] 63s,
B
o
)plqpfl
CC 12-06-2022
471 of 759
L \
DeAnza Ventures, LLC
!0122 Bandley Dr. Suite ACupertino, CA 95014
slamp
Address Label
CC 12-06-2022
472 of 759
go
o
T'
oc) {r6'
!
To-ct
o-:-+o
J^tFc)
lgls
lsl!alpl!^
lsF
l=tot=
3o,e$.4
.o
N.l oNN
9tt
E=3F
-r :t qi >{ 6', o,
xa* RB8g
vITq,
=.
o,3orNq,
vo
CL
o
g.ott3o
5r)g
E
oa.o
0oo,z
q.
q9-
E
o
a3
.-(.
( B3.+:
6oEA9AiEe iim=cL:too=
p.i or=
og #. H.gfr
€il EO
os6do.a gs
ttooQ3 qEs3'
pp!t o, qs
3'Eoo'!t
E. :' G
(1o3o
o
s6B EE
E '.D
D,-rQ
E. ila* -E
3 o5 Tr@8psgEo
g.e oo
a='t)*Orsop€ 'ct
g b.JlD ..1 cro FT CL Of ?j doEl- 6g€e8e
{l{.J='q, maf)o=345O)L
J;T id(Dv, =€ooEi.

T 5o, sa
!a o, gF)g.?='ff
og
rocL> ur3F+Fsg
3cl 9dc! oro-hJcg <. 6$fs;'g'0 :t 6'o iE
E$€Fto ogo='
B6;d.'i
o uc) oa
b)a ul 9l
Z, Fitr,o 9=F* 3eEE
eaq, lD .! +*
oea
oe
{€
o3o
lD*.
mvt
!taf'trttaooCL6-CL
vto*
trr.tCL
t
sE
3}\lNohl
ge
-lr -t
o
3tO
u, (tot;'
ol.lJtr,o!t3
!,=CL
€oc3oo
CL !'
Dg3l-tr,t9ct N19-lr -to3trut c) tt3r'oJu, ott3
-tOO'F 3g3?!DF
CL
o
o(D
i=@o
co
P
ogq,oo,
tl
coIAdvl
E
oo, t^oCL
oooIAo,
o
o
=oCTou,
\
I
6)
o
GI
m
CLo3
.\
a
o
't
o
uroooqto
xo\ ol t,
o.l=
t
5o
N
c)
\o
$ut ol q,
I
oo\ gl
N
;{\otu(Jl
I(tot
oI@o00l\t
In\olu('l
I\o(, ('lIofut\) tu
o
3 +
ooo:'N
o
o5
c-l
o(olO
3 9.
oo
t
CC 12-06-2022
473 of 759
x
06?0-t8t9/ xI svllvo
06r0t8 xog od
3SVHC NVeUOn dr
:ol
dtHs
6tlgg9ge0# pe orddy aleg cluorpa13
#
09 9NtvSvul SunlvN9ts sdsn
8tz9 Lrr0 0866 9808 0lt6
9009
fiilffiffiffitil| tilililil
o3unoSu 3sfllvNgts
2990.€99t6 VC Z3NltUVn
z99r xo8 0d
31't S3tlUSdOUd ClJlCVd AV8
y\toolGt n e3u9
9000
angen:gouZzl6t/eo :olBO trrorqo6 pslredct
ruAVO-Z'llvtll
AllUOlUd
€sst6uro,tpelen
ao?fivtol
_-.....,:. uolauryocl ' : dri6;anr. ersrrs I
OlV.d
3CVlSOC-'S:ft ruaqarrqr
I
!8e9 rzo0OoUis rrlrsf',*g tlio 08669e080!16 ,rx#l
@dlqs*N-rclrc "ffi4
oo
S
I
c'asI
iFH
A
39E A
Hsg 6'i3E
A
EFT I c=
oll c3o.o :c(l0o'bFzd9oT3Ir
r!ilF!o6eEEo=E; .B
6;.oooo
o
o
t
o
E
oeE
t
crloocat
o
o Hi
AFo=8: CLC s.i si3€Eo5J aEl gdgdO:a g:
o
o-
,<'
os
Q
-aorIz
lt,
J-
€'
@l-!lC'E.
vooonCL
(0!e9, oEsg19o @o toc:'* o!i !iJAO
;gNl 6"
ctt o
3J'eADit fi"
('r orao@6ox{
des
E
g gE 6-: s. r86 5i; oo4Eoo
C 3a nt bio El o ctr
g$s
EAF o
o
ooooo6) NNooNNNN
oo(o
N
o
NN
.ll63
;EE9H:89 aRi66
fi Ee stm67o{ $g
Fat
vo!F!=3
o
9t;FHFlFg g8F itr ct
co . 2)ue$E E€X
$ Ee"ie*
FgE 8Fe too se!-eE
.g 6E
t$*5 6'rBiB
.EE e 6)e
=€ i6 g 6't' E"D cBr
Ehg a-e 5=a
FFA FFg
r
$Nl=
HIE
$Fls
E$\sArf 5. X'
SEsi 3s
TE
Bg$-S
$HE$ct €8!t,
s o\
SE
s
o
CC 12-06-2022
474 of 759
C
o!CN
+oo4t
€c
ilo-Io=o:otorg
o
o
+
.l E'
-53
s6d'
a
e,9 8=aet=
=- g1
doog5e
EqBA$a
Re.6
,
3 -E
II
I
sI
E 1g d g 3q 3
3sE
? ! te F
3 gi
B F g.F 8 r o; o i. 3F E E! E 5'= = FE t lso5iigI
l
oI:ljo
tr
Lo
i
{ooIoco=o6oo6g8
fc
a-
oa
)
EFE -1.8 e
IRfr Feo
t=.53-o
{
ooc!A6
oo
dIl.fr!tDa
Bo
o6
!
aooIoto
{go
r
tta
:E6o
Q
F$EFi *;'r 1i oo {LIi 9egs.n, aE69- e:'5i !a c E3 5 E:
3 eE
I
3I
L
N!jIoo
oPs@
i
{s85o6edto{Irc
.: