Cupertino City Council
April 2, 2025

Wednesday, April 2, 2025
5:0
0 PM

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Special Meeting Non-Televised Closed Session (5:00) and Televised Open Session (6:45)
10300 Torre Avenue and 10350 Torre Avenue and via Teleconference City
Council

LIANG CHAO, MAYOR

KITTY MOORE, VICE MAYOR
J.R. FRUEN, COUNCILMEMBER

SHEILA MOHAN, COUNCILMEMBER
R "RAY" WANG, COUNCILMEMBER

IN PERSON AND TELECONFERENCE MEETING
For more information:
(408) 777-3200 | www.cupertino.gov
AGENDA
1 CC 04-02-2025
1 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025

IN-PERSON AND TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION Me
mbers of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in one of the following ways:
1) Attend in person at Cupertino Community Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue. 2) Tune to Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 on your TV. 3) The meeting will also be streamed live on and online at www.Cupertino.org/youtube and www.Cupertino.org/webcast
Members of the public wishing to comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways:
1) Appear in person for Closed Session in City Hall, Conference Room C or for Open Session in Cupertino Community Hall. Members of the public may provide oral public comments pertaining to the agenda prior to the beginning of Closed Session and after Roll Call.

Members of the public may provide oral public comments during the Open Session as follows:

Oral public comments will be accepted during the meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item.

Members of the audience who address the City Council must come to the lectern/microphone, and are requested to complete a Speaker Card and identify themselves.

Completion of Speaker Cards and identifying yourself is voluntary and not required to attend the meeting or provide comments.
2) E-mail comments for Closed Session or Open Session by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 2 to the Council at [email protected]. These e-mail comments will also be forwarded to Councilmembers by the City Clerk’s office before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. Members of the public that wish to share a document must email [email protected] prior to the meeting.

Emailed comments received following the agenda publication, prior to or during the meeting, will be posted to the City’s website Comments on non-agenda items will be included upon the sender's request.
3) Open Session Teleconferencing Instructions

2 CC 04-02-2025
2 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025
To address the City Council, click on the link below to register in advance and access the m
eeting:

Online
Register in advance for this webinar:
https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_KvMDmHWeQbiGGdO5a3uM0Q Phone
Dial: 669-900-6833 and enter Webinar ID: 942 0185 8659 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak, *6 to unmute yourself). Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number.

Join from an H.323/SIP room system:

H.323:
144.195.19.161 (US West)
206.247.11.121 (US East)
Meeting ID: 942 0185 8659
SIP: [email protected]
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

Please read the following instructions carefully:

1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer.

2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation.

3. When the Mayor calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand,” or, if you are calling in, press *9. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.

4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic.

3 CC 04-02-2025
3 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025

5. Members of the public that wish to share a document must email [email protected] prior to the meeting. These documents will be posted to the City’s website after the meeting.

NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino City Council is hereby called for Wednesday, April 2, 2025, for a Closed Session commencing at 5:00 p.m. in City Hall, Conference Room C, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 and an Open Session at 6:45 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 and via teleconference. Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting."

SPECIAL MEETING
ROLL CALL - 5:00 P M
10300 Torre Avenue, Conference Room C

CLOSED SESSION

1. Subject: Public employee performance evaluation; Title: City Manager; California Government Code Section 54954.5(e) and 54957(b).

2. Subject: Conference with legal counsel-anticipated litigation; California Government Code Sections 54954.5(c) and 54956.9(e)(1): (4 cases).

RECESS
O

PEN SESSION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 PM
10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall and via Teleconference

ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

CEREMONIAL ITEMS

3. Subject: Recognition of April as Fair Housing Month Recommended Action: P resent proclamation recognizing April as Fair Housing Month A - Proclamation

4. S ubject: Recognition of April as Donate Life Month Recommended Action: P resent proclamation recognizing April as Donate Life Month

4 CC 04-02-2025
4 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025
A - Proclamation

5. S ubject: Recognition of April 1 as Odisha Day in the City of Cupertino Recommended Action: Present proclamation recognizing April 1 as Odisha Day in the City of Cupertino
A - Proclamation

POSTPONEMENTS AND ORDERS OF THE DAY

6. Subject: Updates to the Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities, Friendship Cities, and International Delegations pertaining to international travel Recommended Action: Postponement of the Sister City policy update to the April 15, 2025 Council meeting.

Staff Report

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on any matter within t
he jurisdiction of the Council and not on the agenda for discussion. The total time for Oral Communications will ordinarily be limited to one hour. Individual speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. As necessary, the Chair may further limit the time allowed to individual speakers, or reschedule remaining comments to the end of the meeting on a first come first heard basis, with priority given to students. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Council from discussing or making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. A councilmember may, however, briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by speakers. A councilmember may also ask a question for clarification, provide a reference for factual information, request staff to report back concerning a matter, or request that an item be added to a future City Council agenda in response to public comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Items appearing on the Consent Calendar are considered routine City business and may be approved by o
ne motion. Typical items may include meeting minutes, awards of contracts, the ratification of accounts payable, and second readings of ordinances. Any member of the Council may request to have an item removed from the Consent Calendar based on the rules set forth in the City Council Procedures Manual. Members of the public may provide input on one or more consent calendar items when the Mayor asks for public comments on the Consent Calendar.

7. S ubject: Approval of March 18, 2025 City Council minutes Recommended Action: App rove the March 18, 2025 City Council minutes A - Draft Minutes
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
P
age 5
5 CC 04-02-2025
5 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025
Effective January 1, 2023, Government Code Section 65103.5 (SB 1214) limits the distribution of copyrighted material associated with the review of development projects. Members of the public wishing to view plans that cannot otherwise be distributed under SB 1214 may make an appointment with the Planning Division to view them at City Hall by sending an email to [email protected]. Plans will also be made available digitally during the hearing to consider the proposal.

ACTION CALENDAR

8. Subject: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among West Valley Cities (Cupertino, Campbell, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and Town of Los Gatos) for a feasibility study to evaluate the potential of any temporary housing or emergency shelter.

Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU for the West Valley Cities Shelter Feasibility Study.

Staff Report
A - West Valley Cities Shelter Feasibility Study Memorandum of Understanding

9. S ubject: Consider the adoption of a City Council Special Project Policy Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 25-022 approving the City Council Special Project Policy
Staff report
A – City Council Special Project Policy
B – Draft Resolution

10. S ubject: Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan Recommended Action: Receive presentation and provide input on the development of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan Staff Report
A - FY 24-25 CIP Status and FY 25-26 Proposal
B - FY 25-26 CIP Project Narratives
C - FY 25-26 CIP Fiscal Summary Table and Five-year Projected Plan D - Master Plans Project Lists
E - Capital Reserve Information

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
C

ITY MANAGER REPORT

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - CONTINUED

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS

11. Subject: Councilmember Reports

6 CC 04-02-2025
6 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025
A - Councilmember Report, Chao
B - Councilmember Report, Fruen
C - Councilmember Report, Mohan
D - Councilmember Report, Moore
E - Councilmember Report, Wang

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
A

DJOURNMENT
Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements: Individuals who influence or attempt to influence l
egislative or administrative action may be required by the City of Cupertino’s lobbying ordinance (Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 2.100) to register and report lobbying activity. Persons whose communications regarding any legislative or administrative are solely limited to appearing at or submitting testimony for any public meeting held by the City are not required to register as lobbyists.

For more information about the lobbying ordinance, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014; telephone (408) 777-3223; email [email protected]; and website: www.cupertino.org/lobbyist.

The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law.

Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi-judicial) decision, interested persons must file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to http://www.cupertino.org/cityclerk for a reconsideration petition form.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request in advance by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours; and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the City web site.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section

7 CC 04-02-2025
7 of 321
City Council A genda April 2, 2025

2.08.100 w ritten communications sent to the City Council, Commissioners or staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City website and kept in packet archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will be made publicly available on the City website.

8 CC 04-02-2025
8 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13843 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 1.

Subject: Public employee performance evaluation; Title: City Manager; California Government Code Section 54954.5(e) and 54957(b).

CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/26/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
9 CC 04-02-2025
9 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13797 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 2.

Subject: Conference with legal counsel-anticipated litigation; California Government Code Sections 54954.5(c) and 54956.9(e)(1): (4 cases).

CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/26/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
10 CC 04-02-2025
10 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13630 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 3.

Subject: Recognition of April as Fair Housing Month
Present proclamation recognizing April as Fair Housing Month CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/25/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
11 CC 04-02-2025
11 of 321
12 CC 04-02-2025
12 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13838 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 4.

Subject: Recognition of April as Donate Life Month
Present proclamation recognizing April as Donate Life Month CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/25/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
13 CC 04-02-2025
13 of 321
14 CC 04-02-2025
14 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13856 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 5.

Subject: Recognition of April 1 as Odisha Day in the City of Cupertino Present proclamation recognizing April 1 as Odisha Day in the City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/25/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
15 CC 04-02-2025
15 of 321
16 CC 04-02-2025
16 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13844 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 6.

Subject: Updates to the Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities, Friendship Cities, and International Delegations pertaining to international travel
Postponement of the Sister City policy update to the April 15, 2025 Council meeting.

CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/26/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
17 CC 04-02-2025
17 of 321
CUP ‐ Staff Report re Sister City Travel Discussion(1055413.1).odt

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting:  April 2, 2025

Subject
Updates to the Policies and Guidelines on Sister Cities, Friendship Cities, and International Delegations pertaining to international travel

Recommended Action
Postponement of the Sister City policy update to the April 15, 2025 Council meeting.

Reasons for Recommendation

At the March 4, 2025 meeting, the City Council passed a resolution to continue the item with direction to bring back a redlined version with proposed changes for Council consideration within one month.  However, the Sister City policy update will not be ready in time for the April 2, 2025 meeting.  The City Attorney is requesting a postponement to the April 15, 2025 meeting.

Sustainabilit
y Impact
No sustainability impact.

Fiscal Impact

If updates are eventually adopted, such updates might permit the City Council to limit the number of trips and officials traveling to sister cities on an annual basis, which will result in savings.

California Environmental Quality Act
No California Environmental Quality Act impact.

_____________________________________

Prepared by: Floy Andrews, City Attorney

Approved for Submission by:  City Manager

18 CC 04-02-2025
18 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
24-13587 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 7.

Subject: Approval of March 18, 2025 City Council minutes Approve the March 18, 2025 City Council minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/26/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
19 CC 04-02-2025
19 of 321

DRAFT MINUTES

CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 18, 2025

SPECIAL MEETING

At 5:30 p.m., Mayor Liang Chao called the Special City Council Meeting to order in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue and via teleconference.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Liang Chao, Vice Mayor Kitty Moore, and Councilmembers J.R. Fruen, Sheila Mohan, and Ray Wang. Absent: None.

ACTION CALENDAR

1. Subject: Introduce Municipal Code amendments to the Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 2 to add Chapter 2.96 and codify the Economic Development Committee Recommended Action: 1. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 25-2269 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending City Code Title 2 Chapter 2.96: Economic Development Committee”

2. Find that the proposed actions are exempt for CEQA

Written communications for this item included emails to the Council.

City Attorney Floy Andrews reviewed the staff report.

Economic Development Manager Daniel Degu provided background information and answered questions.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

Jean Bedord
Jennifer Griffin
20 CC 04-02-2025
20 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

San R

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Moore moved and Wang seconded to move the Recommended Action to:

1. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 25-2269 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending City Code Title 2 Chapter 2.96:

Economic Development Committee”

2. Find that the proposed actions are exempt for CEQA;.

The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, and Wang. Noes:

Fruen and Mohan. None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

STUDY SESSION

2. Subject: Study Session to consider reestablishing the City’s Legislative Review Committee.

Recommended Action: Provide staff direction on reestablishing the Legislative Review Committee and direct the City Attorney to consider the impact of Municipal Code Section 2.17.031 on any reestablished Legislative Review Committee.

Written communications for this item included emails to the Council.

City Attorney Floy Andrews reviewed the staff report.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

Jennifer Griffin
San R

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Moore m oved and Chao seconded to have the LRC be a Council Subcommittee for the 2025 legislative session, which ends October 12, 2025, with the purpose to:

1. Make recommendations to Council regarding support or opposition of pending legislation following the existing Legislative Platform on the City website. a. Recommendations will ordinarily be a Consent Calendar item.

2. Advise the Council of potential changes for consideration to the exi sting Legislative Platform for Council to consider updating it.
21 CC 04-02-2025
21 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

3. Based on the Council's approval or modifications of the Subcommittee legislative recommendations, the Mayor will send letters of support or opposition on the various bills of interest; and

4. Additionally, to provide direction to staff to modify the current lobbyist contract Scope of Work to return the provision of information to the Council, as outlined in the Original Scope of Work.

FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Chao made a friendly amendment to a ppoint Vice Mayor Moore and Councilmember Wang to the Council S ubcommittee. (Moore accepted the friendly amendment).

FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Moore made a friendly amendment requesting an informational memo to provide all reports received from lobbying consultant Joe Gonsalves & Sons since January 2023. (Chao accepted the friendly amendment).

The amended motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, and Wang.

Noes: Fruen and Mohan. None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

ADJOURNMENT

At 6:49 p.m. Mayor Chao adjourned the Special City Council meeting.

REGULAR MEETING

At 6:54 p.m., Mayor Liang Chao called the Regular City Council Meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue and via teleconference.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Liang Chao, Vice Mayor Kitty Moore, and Councilmembers J.R. Fruen, Sheila Mohan, and R “Ray” Wang. Absent: None.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT – None

CEREMONIAL ITEMS

1. Subject: Receipt of annual report of activities from West Valley Community Services (WVCS) and recognition for 51 years of dedicated community service Recommended Action: Receive annual report of activities from WVCS and present proclamation recognizing 51 years of dedicated community service 22 CC 04-02-2025
22 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

Written communications for this item included a presentation.

West Valley Community Services (WVCS) Executive Director Sujatha Venkatraman gave a presentation and received the proclamation.

Council received the annual report of activities from WVCS and Mayor Chao presented the proclamation recognizing 51 years of dedicated community service.

POSTPONEMENTS AND ORDERS OF THE DAY – None

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

Written communications for this item included emails to the Council.

The following members of the public spoke:

Dennis Park, Pamela Hershey, Qian Wang, Debi Chessen, and Lisa Warren discus sed the sound wall separating N. Portal from Wolfe Road Housing development and The Rise , and a petition. (Submitted written comments).

Jennifer Griffin discussed the Sound Wall separating N. Portal from the Wolfe Road Housing development and The Rise.

Jaria Jaug, representing Build the Future, discussed affordable childcare.

Bicycle Pedestrian Commissioner Muni Madhdhipatla (representing self) discussed homeless encampments, RV parking, and separated bike lanes.

Sustainability Commissioner Sonali Padgaonkar (representing self) , Sai Mylavarapu, Sayalee Mylavarapu discussed crime prevention, sheriff services, and public safety initiatives.

Kelly discussed off-leash dog rules, signage, and enforcement.

Brooke Ezzat discussed budget management and oversight, contracts policy guidelines, staffing, and management of request to speak cards.

Call-in-user-1 discussed a code enforcement matter with the City regarding their property.

Planning Commissioner San R (representing self) discussed the Foothill-De Anza Community College District’s purchase of McClellan Terrace.
23 CC 04-02-2025
23 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

Tessa Parish discussed the Sound Wall separating N. Portal from the Wolfe Road Housing development and The Rise, and the Public Safety Commission.

Mayor Chao continued Oral Communications to after City Manager’s Report.

The following members of the public spoke:

Louise Saadati discussed City Council meeting procedures and the Sound Wall separating N.

Portal from the Wolfe Road Housing development and The Rise.

Jean Bedord discussed City Council meeting procedures.

Chao requested an info rmational memo on burglary statistics and the Sheriff’s response efforts.

CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 2-7)

Item 7 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Mohan.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and, seeing no one, closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Fruen moved and Wang seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar except as indicated. The motion passed w ith the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Fruen , Mohan, and Wang. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

MOTION: Moore moved and Wang seconded to reorder the agenda to hear Item 7 after Public Hearings. The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Mohan, and Wang.

Noes: Fruen. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

2. Subject: Approval of March 3, 2025 City Council minutes and Workshop Summary Recommended Action: Approve the March 3, 2025 City Council minutes and Workshop Summary

3. Subject: Approval of March 4, 2025 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the March 4, 2025 City Council minutes

4. Subject: Ratifying Accounts Payable for the periods ending February 14, 2025 and February 28, 2025
Recommended Action: A. Adopt Resolution No. 25-019 ratifying Accounts Payable for 24 CC 04-02-2025
24 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

the Period ending February 14, 2025; and
B. Adopt Resolution No. 25-020 ratifying Accounts Payable for the Period ending February 28, 2025

5. Subject: Construction contract for the 2025 Slurry Seal/Fog Seal Project to Doolittle Construction, LLC. in the amount of $859,000.

Recommended Action: 1. Award a construction contract for the 2025 Slurry Seal/Fog Seal Project number 2025-102 in the amount of $859,000 to Doolittle Construction, LLC.

2. Reject the non-responsive bid of the lowest bidder.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract with Doolittle Construction, LLC. when all conditions have been met.

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary construction change orders up to a construction contingency amount of $85,900 (10%) for a total contract amount not to exceed $944,900.

6. Subject: Receive 2024 General Plan and Housing Annual Progress Report (APR) Recommended Action: Receive the General Plan and Housing APRs

PUBLIC HEARINGS – None

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

7. Subject: Reaffirm amendments to the Cupertino City Council Procedures Manual (Continued from March 4, 2025 City Council Meeting)
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 25-021 reaffirming amendments to the Cupertino City Council Procedures Manual

Written communications for this item included emails to the Council.

This item was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.

Mayor Chao introduced the item.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

San R
Louise Saadati

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

25 CC 04-02-2025
25 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

MOTION: Moore moved and Wang seconded to Adopt Resolution No. 25 -021 reaffirming amendments to the Cupertino City Council Procedures Manual . The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, and Wang. Noes: Fruen and Mohan. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

ACTION CALENDAR

8. Subject: Receive Citywide Policy Inventory; Authorize Gap Analysis Final Report and Review the City Council Policy Inventory
Recommended Action: 1. Receive the Citywide Policy Inventory and Gap Analysis Report

2. Review the City Council Policy Inventory and authorize Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”) to include gap analysis as part of the FY 2025-26 Internal Audit Work Plan

Written communications for this item included a presentation, desk item report with staff responses to councilmember questions, and emails to the Council.

Director of Administrative Services Kristina Alfaro and Chelsea Ritchie, Director with Moss Adams, gave a presentation.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

San R
Peggy Griffin

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Fruen moved and Mohan seconded the Recommended Action to:

1. Receive the Citywide Policy Inventory and Gap Analysis Report; and

2. Review the City Council Policy Inventory and authorize Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”) to include gap analysis as part of the FY 2025 -26 Internal Audit Work Plan.

FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Wang made a friendly amendment to direct staff to provide to the Council, to the broadest extent possible, the internal staff policies that have not been made available to the public . (Fruen declined the friend ly amendment and it was not included in the motion).

The Council did not vote on this motion.

SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Moore moved and Wang seconded a substitute motion for the 26 CC 04-02-2025
26 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

Recommended Action, as amended, to:

1. Receive the Citywide Policy Inventory and Gap Analysis Report;

2. Review the City Council Policy Inventory and authorize Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”) to include gap analysis as part of the FY 2025 -26 Internal Audit Work Plan; and

3. Additionally, to provide the City Council access to the administrative po licies in a confidential manner, either electronically or in a secure, in-person setting.

FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Wang made a friendly amendment to provide the policies on a OneDrive folder. (Moore accepted the friendly amendment).

The amended substitute motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Mohan, and Wang. Noes: Fruen. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

At 9:08 p.m. Mayor Chao recessed the meeting. The meeting reconvened at 9:1 7 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

9. Subject: Receive City Council Subcommittee report on July 4th fireworks and provide Council direction for next steps
Recommended Action: Receive the City Council Subcommittee report on July 4th fireworks and provide Council direction for next steps

Written communications for this item included a desk item report with staff responses to councilmember questions, A – Update: Fourth of July Celebrations, and emails to the Council.

Councilmember Wang reviewed the item.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

Ava Chiao
San R
Peggy Griffin

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

Council received the City Council Subcommittee report on July 4th fireworks. The Council did not provide any direction.

10. Subject: Confirm recommended language for two new City Council Strategic Goals; Finalize Fiscal Years 2025-2027 City Work Program
27 CC 04-02-2025
27 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

Recommended Action: 1. Confirm the recommended language for the two new City Council Strategic Goals; Environmental Sustainability and Fiscal Strategy

2. Finalize the Fiscal Years 2025-2027 City Work Program

Written communications for this item included a presentation, desk item report with staff responses to councilmember questions, desk item s for First Ranking - Individual Councilmembers and Second Ranking - Individual Councilmembers, and emails to the Council.

Deputy City Manager Tina Kapoor gave a presentation.

Councilmembers asked questions and made comments.

Mayor Chao opened the public comment period and the following people spoke.

Peggy Griffin
Tracy K
San R

Mayor Chao closed the public comment period.

MOTION: Chao moved and Moore seconded to approve the Proposed List (Attachment F) with the following modifications:

Motion part 1: Consolidate #1, #2, #3, #4, and #13 and retitle as: Economic Development for retail and small businesses - start in Year 1
Revised Description: Economic Development for retail and small businesses

1. Streamline permitting process for small businesses

2. Retention and recruitment of retail and small businesses: Explore options to support small businesses/startups, fill empty storefronts, and encourage entry of new forms of retail to promote revitalization:
 Explore more themed events like restaurant week, and other festivals to bring vitality to Cupertino businesses
 Improve placemaking in the City and the City's revenue stream

3. Create a small business council, provide regulatory support

Motion part 2: Revise #9 (which removes and incorporates #8) - add parkland impact fee and start in Year 1
New Title: Defensible Impact Fee Nexus Study for Traffic Impact Fee, Retail Impact Fee, BMR (Below Market Rate) Impact Fee + Parkland Impact Fee Description:
28 CC 04-02-2025
28 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

With almost every infill project approval and revision, we are losing almost all retail with almost zero parking. New units tend to provide more townhomes, rather than much needed smaller starter units or senior flats. With potential challenges to waive impact fees a nd design standards, a defensible Nexus study is necessary to protect the City in order to collect impact fees since California Constitution does not allow unfunded mandates levied on cities Staff description: Proceed with nexus studies to review a range o f impact fees and other means of offsetting conversion of commercial land uses to residential.

Revised Description: Conduct nexus studies to review a range of impact fees, such as Traffic Impact Fee, Retail Impact Fee, BMR Impact Fee, and Parkland Impact Fee and other means of offsetting conversion of commercial land uses to residential to ensure the impact fees are defensible against legal challenges

Motion part 3: #14 (Proposed List): City Properties: Planning for Optimal Use => Revised to include Barn and house at entrance of Blackberry Farm Revised Description: Future planning strategies for Stocklmeir house/garages, Blesch House, Blue Pheasant. Goal of judicial use of City-owned properties.

Investigate potential purchase of CUSD Finch/Phil property.  Include the McClellan Barn and the house at the entrance of Blackberry Farm

Motion part 4: #5 Permit Streamlining and Simplification for Small Home Upgrades - revise to include specifics from Wang’s item
Revised Description: Develop a suite of improvements to (1) improve access to, and (2) speed the processing of permits for small home upgrades to enhance compliance and improve overall efficiency
 To consider: Improve the turnaround times. Set SLA's (Service Level Agreements) for staff and outsourced reviewers, customer service KPI's (Key Performance Indicators) , templates to reduce back and forth, internal staff expertise to reduce consulting expenses

Motion part 5: Replace #18 (Proposed) with Revised #3 (Not Selected) - add notification for SB 330 and other projects during the application and approval process - start in Year (1) one
Revised Description (from #3)
Enhance Notification Methods for Development Projects and General Plan Amendments
 Consider a community meeting requirement for any major pro ject application, especially those requiring a general plan amendment, as some other cities have adopted.
 Consider increasing notification radius from 300 feet to 500 feet (or even 1000 feet for major projects) for any project application, especially those requiring a 29 CC 04-02-2025
29 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

general plan amendment.
 Improve notification methods for SB 330 preliminary applications, streamlined projects, not requiring planning/council approval and other projects

Motion part 6: #19 (Proposed List) Unhoused Policies
Revised Description: Continue this work program item. Determine best practices for limited budget smaller cities to manage the unhoused. Review RV practices in surrounding cities for impacts and potential adoption. Review transitional housing outcomes in surrounding cities . Policies to include nimble contingency plans

Motion part 7: Remove #7 (Proposed List) Heart of the City Specific Plan Update - $1M too large, scope unclear

Motion part 8: Remove #11 (Proposed List) Blackberry Farms Pool and Picnic Area CEQA Review

The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, and Wang. Noes:

Fruen and Mohan. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

At 10:19 p.m. Councilmember Wang left the meeting.

MOTION: Chao moved and Moore seconded to confirm the recommended language for the two new City Council Strategic Goals; Environmental Sustainability and Fiscal Strategy. The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Fruen, and Mohan. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Wang.

MOTION: Chao moved and Moore seconded to exten d the meeting to hear C ity Manager Report, Oral Communications - Continued, and Future Agenda Items. The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Chao, Moore, Fruen, and Mohan. Noes: None. Abstain: None.

Absent: Wang.

CITY MANAGER REPORT - None

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS – CONTINUED

As noted under Oral Communications, the following comments were continued to after City Manager’s Report.

Louise Saadati discussed City Council meeting procedures and the Sound Wall separating N.

Portal from the Wolfe Road Housing development and The Rise.

30 CC 04-02-2025
30 of 321
City Council Minutes March 18, 2025

Jean Bedord discussed City Council meeting procedures.

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS

8. Subject: Councilmember Reports

Councilmembers reported on their various committees and events as provided in the published agenda.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Chao added a study session to discuss the policy for the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) approval process.

As noted under Special Meeting Item 2, Moore requested an informational memo to provide all reports received from lobbying consultant Joe Gonsalves & Sons since January 2023.

As noted under Oral Communications, Chao requested an informational memo on burglary statistics and the Sheriff’s response efforts.

ADJOURNMENT

At 10:41 p.m. Mayor Chao adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting.

Minutes prepared by:

_________________________
Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk

31 CC 04-02-2025
31 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13837 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 8.

Subject: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among West Valley Cities (Cupertino, Campbell, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and Town of Los Gatos) for a feasibility study to evaluate the potential of any temporary housing or emergency shelter.

Authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU for the West Valley Cities Shelter Feasibility Study.

CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/25/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
32 CC 04-02-2025
32 of 321

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
April 2, 2025

Subject
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among West Valley Cities ( Cupertino, Campbell, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and Town of Los Gatos) for a feasibility study to evaluate the potential of any temporary housing facility or emergency shelter.

Recommended Action
Authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU for the West Valley Cities Shelter Feasibility Study.

Reasons for Recommendation
By entering into the MO U, there is no fiscal obligation from Cupertino to proceed with the feasibility that will allow the west valley cities to explore a regional approach for the existing unhoused population to understand any unique demographic and service needs.

Background
The City of Campbell initiated this effort in Oct ober 2024 to fulfill its Housing Element commitments to study the feasibility of developing temporary housing facilities and emergency shelters for the unhoused. Neighboring west valley cities were consulted to explore opportunities for collaboration to en act similar housing element policies. By joining this effort, the City of Cupertino will further its commitments as outlined in HE -5.1.1 Emergency Shelters and HE -5.1.4 Low Barrier Navigation Center and Supportive Services in the City’s certified Housing Element, of adopting state required zoning changes to allow emergency shelters and navigation centers for the unhoused, by studying the feasibility of their development.

The following definitions of the various types of shelters and housing for the unhoused are as follows:
 Seasonal shelters offer overnight stay during select months of the year or during extreme weather conditions (usually winter).
33 CC 04-02-2025
33 of 321
2  Emergency homeless shelters provide overnight beds, are open year -round to the general public, and have no requirement for entry.
 Special needs shelter s cater to a specific portion of the unhoused population, who by their nature, require higher confidentiality and have a selective requirement for entry .

Examples include youth shelters or domestic violence shelters.  Navigation centers provide congregate beds at low barrier for entry for extended stays with case management and supportive services with the goal of entering individuals into temporary or transitional housing. Stays generally range between 30 to 60 days.  Temporary housing, also known as non -congregate shelters, provide separate furnished rooms with stays between 1 and 3 months per household.
 Transitional housing is similar to temporary housing, but it also provides case management and supportive services with the goal of exiting indiv iduals into stability.

Stays are for extended terms that can be up to 24 months.  Permanent support ive housing is long-term housing with supportive services for individuals that experience chronic homelessness.

The City of Cupertino provides grant funding to various nonprofit organizations for supportive services to the unhoused through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Human Service Grant (HSG), and other various local and regional funding programs. While these services are vital for assisting the unhoused, some are not available throughout the year, such as the Rotating Safe Car Park program, which only operates in two month increments. Meanwhile, other programs are restricted to a select portion of the unhoused population, such as the Maitri Anjali Domestic Violence Transitional Housing program , which provides shelter and case management for women and children fleeing violence in their homes . Therefore, the City has only provided seasonal and special needs shelters to this date.

There is a need for more types of shelter and housing for the unhoused, in particular, emergency shelter and temporary housing in the City. While the City of Cupertino is an active participating member of the Santa Clara County Continuum of Care, which manages shelters for all jurisdictions in Santa Clara County, the City has yet to develop an emergency shelter that is available year -round and available to the general population within its own borders. For an unhoused person in Cupertino to be placed into a shelter, they are scored for acuity in the County Continuum of Care assessment, and if placed into an available bed, must relocate to a shelter far outside of their community. Furthermore, none of the cities in the West Santa Clara Valley have permanent shelters available to the general public throughout the year. This may pose a risk to the City as a potential exclusionary fair housing concern (which covers all aspects of housing and housing-related services, including shelters) as shelter services are segregated to specific areas of the County.

34 CC 04-02-2025
34 of 321
3 West Valley Cities Memorandum of Understanding
The City of Cupertino, along with other cities in the Santa Clara West Valley, such as the Cities of Campbell, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and the Town of Los Gatos will join efforts to collectively study the feasibility of developing temporary and emergency housing facilities, and expanding supportive services for the unhoused in the West Valley. The effort is lead by the City of Campbell, who will be re sponsible for funding the study in the amount of $99,000 with funds acquired through the American Rescue Plan Act and managing procurement, execution, and deliverables of the contract with the consultant conducting the study, Good City Company. The other C ities will be participating jurisdictions which agree to be included within the area of study, to share necessary data with the consultant to complete the study , and to share the findings of the study with their respective City Councils upon completion . The West Valley Cities each plan to authorize their respective City Managers to execute the MOU on the following dates:
 Campbell – Council approved on February 18th
 Los Gatos – February 24th
 Monte Sereno – March 4th
 Saratoga – March 19th
 Monte Sereno – April 1st
In order to be part of the regional effort, staff recommends the Council to authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of Campbell, Cupertino, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and Town of Los Gatos for the joint f easibility study of development of temporary and emergency ho using facilities and programs for the unhoused.

The proposed MOU can be found in Attachment A.

Sustainability Impact
None

Fiscal Impact
None

Prepared by: Nicky Vu, Senior Housing Coordinator
Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Approved for Submission by: Pamela Wu, City Manager
Legal review by: Floy Andrews, Interim City Attorney

Attachments:

A - West Valley Cities Shelter Feasibility Study Memorandum of Understanding

35 CC 04-02-2025
35 of 321

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

City of Campbell
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008

AND

City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014

City of Monte Sereno
18041 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road
Monte Sereno, CA 95030

City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitdale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070

Town of Los Gatos
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030

1. Purpose

The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), effective as of the date of the last signer hereto, is to formalize the collaborative efforts between five parties, the Cities of Campbell, Cupertino, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and the Town of Los Gatos (individually “party” and together “parties”) to conduct a feasibility study (“feasibility study”) for the possible development of temporary and emergency housing facilities and programs to service the unhoused population within the five jurisdictions. Collectively the five jurisdictions encompass the West Valley area (“West Valley Area”) of the County of Santa Clara. The City of Campbell has funded and executed an agreement with a consultant, Good City Co., to evaluate the feasibility of establishing temporary and emergency shelter services in the West Valley Area to serve the five parties. This MOU outlines the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of each party in relation to the feasibility study and next steps. Accordingly, the parties agree as follows:

2. Scope of the Feasibility Study

The feasibility study will include the following components:

• Needs Assessment: Evaluating the existing unhoused population within the West Valley area as a whole to understand any unique demographic and service needs. • Stakeholder Engagement: Gathering input from community members, local government, and other key stakeholders concerning unhoused service needs. 36 CC 04-02-2025
36 of 321
• Fea
sibility Study: Analysis and recommendations concerning feasible temporary or emergency housing facilities and services that can be provided in the West Valley area to serve the needs of the unhoused population. This will include an evaluation of the initial and ongoing costs and capacity to support different housing facilities but not provide any site specific analysis for a new facility.

3. Ro
les and Responsibilities
Ci
ty of Campbell (Lead Organization):
• Lead the overall management on preparing the feasibility study. • Manage the Consultant contract with Good City, Co.
• Provide project oversight, including the scheduling of meetings and deadlines. • Collect data regarding the needs for shelter services in the community as requested by the Consultant.
• Provide funding or resources, as applicable, to support the study. • Receive and review the final feasibility report and recommendations before the City Council.

Ci
ty of Cupertino, Monte Sereno, Saratoga and Town of Los Gatos (Partner Organizations):
• Assist in data collection and needs assessment, particularly with regard to the target population as requested by the Consultant.
• Participate in stakeholder engagement and community outreach efforts as needed. • Help identify potential funding sources and grant opportunities, if needed, to support the feasibility study and any further implementation actions. • Review and provide input on the Needs Analysis and the Feasibility study reports. • Receive and review the final feasibility report and recommendations before the respective City or Town Council.

4. Timeline
Th
e feasibility study by Good City, Co. will begin in November 2024 and is expected to be completed by August 2025.

5. Funding and Resource Allocation
The
City of Campbell will be responsible for funding the $99,000 associated with the estimated cost of the feasibility study. In the case that additional funding is required to complete the feasibility study, all parties will negotiate in good faith with shared responsibility to secure the necessary financial resources.

6. Con
fidentiality
All
parties agree to maintain confidentiality regarding any sensitive or proprietary information exchanged during the course of this collaboration. Information gathered during the feasibility study will only be shared with relevant stakeholders, and only as required to complete the study. All parties also acknowledge that they are subject to the California Public Records Act (CPRA). Should a request come in that might call for confidential information related to this MOU, the party 37 CC 04-02-2025
37 of 321
re
ceiving the request will give prompt notice to the other parties if any documents are to be released.

7. Ow
nership of Study Results
The
final report and any associated findings, data, or documents generated from the feasibility study will be jointly owned by the City of Campbell and the Cities of Cupertino, Monte Sereno, Saratoga and Town of Los Gatos. All parties agree to work together to determine how the results will be distributed and used, including any publication, presentations, or applications for funding.

9. M
odification of the MOU
Thi
s MOU may be amended or modified only by mutual written consent of the parties. Any modifications will be documented and signed by authorized representatives of the organizations. 10 . Termination
Any pa
rty may terminate this MOU with thirty (30) days written notice to the other parties. In the event of termination, the parties will agree on the disposition of any materials, data, or funding associated with the feasibility study.
11 . Indemnification and Insurance
The pa
rties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a party shall not be shared pro rata pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6 but, instead, the parties agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, to the fullest extent permitted by law, each of the parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other parties, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party, its officers, employees or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such party under this MOU. No party, nor any officer, board member or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the other parties hereto, their officers, board members, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to such other Parties under this MOU. These indemnity obligations shall survive the termination of this MOU.

In
addition, each party will maintain insurance with the following minimum limits or a self-insured retention of the same:
• COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY (CGL): $1,000,000 PER OCCURRENCE; $2,000,000 AGGREGATE. • AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: $1,000,000.
• WORKERS’ COMPENSATION AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITH STATUTORY LIMITS, AND EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY INSURANCE: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

12. Ad
ditional Terms
No
tices under this MOU shall be by US Mail, and concurrently via email, to the head of the department of Planning, or equivalent, for each of the parties and are considered delivered when 38 CC 04-02-2025
38 of 321
th
e email is sent (unless returned undeliverable). This MOU expresses the intent of the parties to collaborate on the issues contained herein and represents the entire understanding of the parties on such matters. Except as the other party may specify in writing, a party shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the other party in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. This MOU shall not be assigned without first obtaining the express written consent of the other parties. All activities of the Parties with respect to this MOU will be carried out in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provisions of this MOU shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal.

13. Si
gnatures
By
signing below, the undersigned and authorized representatives of the five parties acknowledge their agreement to the terms of this MOU.

Ci
ty of Campbell:

Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
Ci
ty of Cupertino:

Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
Ci
ty of Saratoga
Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
[C
ontinued on the following page.]
39 CC 04-02-2025
39 of 321
Ci
ty of Monte Sereno:

Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
To
wn of Los Gatos:

Name: ___________________________
Title: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
Ap
pendices
• Appendix A: City of Campbell Consultant Services Agreement with Good City Company 40 CC 04-02-2025
40 of 321
-1-

CITY OF CAMPBELL

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into at Campbell, California on the 15th day of December, 2024, by and between the CITY OF CAMPBELL (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Good City Company (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant").

WHEREAS, City desires to obtain consulting services for the purpose of providing feasibility study services to analyze the feasibility of constructing shelter, temporary or emergency housing, or similar facility to support the unhoused population of the West Valley Area (Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno and Saratoga) ; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has the expertise, means, and ability to perform said feasibility study services ;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of each other's mutual promises, Consultant and City agree as follows:

1. DUTIES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Consultant agrees to perform services as set forth in Exhibit A - Scope of Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and which shall be interpreted together and in harmony with this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between Exhibit A and this Agreement, this Agreement shall govern, control, and take precedence.

1.2 Consultant’s project manager will meet with the City’s project coordinator prior to commencement of the project to establish a clear understanding of the working relationships, authorities, and management philosophy of City as it relates to this Agreement.

1.3 Consultant, working with the City, will gather available existing information concerning the project, and shall review documents as necessary for compliance with the project’s objectives.

1.4 In performance of this Agreement by Consultant, time will be of the essence.

1.5 Notwithstanding Section 1.4, Consultant shall not be responsible for delay caused by activities or factors beyond Consultant’s reasonable control, including delays or by reason of strikes, work slow-downs or stoppages, or acts of God.

1.6 Consultant agrees to perform this Agreement in accordance with the highest degree of skill and expertise exercised by members of Consultant’s profession working on similar projects under similar circumstances.

Appendix A: City of Campbell Consultant Services Agreement with Good City Company 41 CC 04-02-2025
41 of 321

-2-

1.7 Consultant shall cooperate in good faith with City in all aspects of the performance of this Agreement.

1.8 In the course of the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall act in the City’s best interest as it relates to the project.

1.9 All activities of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and/or agents will be carried out in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

1.10 The designated project manager for Consultant shall be Nicholas Hamilton. The designated principal in charge for this project shall be Aaron Aknin. The Consultant ’s project manager shall have all the necessary authority to direct technical and professional work within the scope of the Agreement and shall serve as the principal point of contact with the City and the City’s project coordinator. The authorized principal of Consultant executing this Agreement for the Consultant shall have authority to mak e decisions regarding changes in services, termination and other matters related to the performance of this agreement on behalf of Consultant.

1.11 The Consultant (and its employees, agents, representatives, and subconsultants), in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or officials or employees or agents of the City. The City shall not direct the work and means for accomplishment of the services and work to be performed hereunder. The City, however, retains the right to require that work performed by Consultant meet specific standards consistent with the requirements of this Agreement without regard to the manner and means of accomplishment thereof. Subcontractors shall assume all of the rights, obligations and liabilities, applicable to it as an independent contractor hereunder. Consultant represents and warrants that it (i) is fully experienced and properly qualified to perform the class of work and services provided for herein, (ii) has the financial capability and shall finance its own operations required for the performance of the work and services and (iii) is properly equipped and organ ized to perform the work and services in a competent, timely and proper manner in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. Consultant agrees to comply with AB5, codified at Labor Code section 2750.3, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, directors, agents representatives, volunteers, and employees against any claim or liability, including attorneys’ fees and costs, arising in any manner related to this Agreement that an employee, agent or others under Consultant’s supervision or control was misclassified.

1.12 This Agreement contains provisions that permit mutually acceptable changes in the scope, character or complexity of the work if such changes become desirable or necessary as the work progresses. Adjustments to the basis of payment and to the time for performance of the work, if any, shall be established by a written contract amendment (approved and executed by the City) to accommodate the changes in work.

2. DUTIES OF CITY

2.1 City shall furnish to Consultant all available and pertinent data and information requested by Consultant to facilitate the preparation of the documents called for in this Agreement. 42 CC 04-02-2025
42 of 321

-3-
Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely on accuracy and completeness of such information, provided that Consultant shall make any additional investigation reasonably necessary to confirm such information and provide City prompt written notice of any known or discovered defects in such data and information.

2.2 City shall provide contract administration services. City shall notify Consultant of required administrative procedures and shall name representatives, if any, authorized to act in its behalf.

2.3 City shall review documents submitted by Consultant and shall render decisions pertaining thereto as promptly as reasonably possible.

3. COMPENSATION

3.1 For the full performance of the services described herein by Consultant, City agrees to compensate Consultant for all services and direct costs associated with the performance of the project in an amount not to exceed $99,000, as follows:
a. Once each month, Consultant shall submit for payment by City, an itemized invoice for services performed during the previous billing period. The invoice shall describe the services rendered and the title of the item of work, and shall list labor hours by personnel classification.

Said invoice shall be based on all labor and direct expense charges made for work performed on the project. Labor charges shall be in accordance with the fee schedule found in Exhibit A of this Agreement. City shall pay Con sultant for services rendered and approved by the City within 30 days from the date the itemized invoice is received by the City , subject to the maximum not to exceed amount specified above and the City’s right to object. b. Direct costs are those outside costs incurred on or directly for the project, and substantiated with invoices for the charges. Direct expenses include printing, reproduction, and delivery charges.

3.2 If Consultant incurs other costs which are not specifically covered by the terms of this Agreement, but which are necessary for performance of Consultant’s duties, City may approve payment for said costs if authorized in writing by the City in advance. 43 CC 04-02-2025
43 of 321

-4-

3.3 City may order changes in the scope or character of services in writing, including decreasing the amount of Consultant’s services. In the event that the work is decreased, Consultant is entitled to full compensation for all services performed and expenses incurred prior to receipt of notice of change. Under no conditions shall Consultant make any changes to the work, either as additions or deductions, without the prior written order of the City. In the event, that the City determines that a change to the work or services from that specified in this Agreement is required, the contract time and/or actual costs reimbursable by the City for the project may be adjusted by contract amendment or change order to accommodate the changed work. The maximum not to exceed total amount specified in this Article 3 (Compensation) shall not be exceeded, unless authorized by written contract amendment or change order, approved and executed by the City.

Consultant shall obtain prior written approval for a revised fee schedule from the City before exceeding such fee schedule. Only City’s authorized representative(s) is authorized to approve changes to this Agreement on behalf of City.

3.4 In no event, will the Consultant be reimbursed for any costs or expenses at any rates that exceed the rates for set forth in the fee schedule found in Exhibit A.

3.5 Consultant agrees that the payments to Consultant specified in this Article 3 (Compensation) will constitute full and complete compensation for all obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. Where conflicts regarding compensation may occur, the provisions of this section apply.

4. SUBCONSULTANTS

4.1 Consultant may not subcontract any services required under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.

4.2 Consultant shall be responsible to City for the performance of any and all subconsultants who perform work under this contract, and any acts of negligence or misconduct on their part. Consultant is solely responsible for all payments due to subconsultants.

4.3 Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all of the requirements stated herein, including naming the City of Campbell, its officers, officials, directors, agents representatives, volunteers, and employees as additional insureds. Any modification to the insurance requirements for subcontractors must be agreed to by the City in writing.

4.4 If at any time, the City determines any subcontractor is incompetent or unqualified, Consultant will be notified and will be expected to immediately cancel the subcontract.

44 CC 04-02-2025
44 of 321

-5-

5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS
All original drawings, documents, papers, data, materials, photographs, negatives and other work products prepared by the Consultant and/or its subconsultants in the performance of the services encompassed in this Agreement (whether in printed or electronic format) (“project-related documents and materials”) shall be the property of the City and may be used on this project without the consent of the Consultant or its subcontractors. City acknowledges that such drawings, documents, and other items are instruments of professional services intended for use only on the subject project. Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the Project-related documents and materials pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of the City. Any project-related documents and materials related to this Agreement shall be confidential, not to be used by the Consultant on other projects or disclosed to any third party, except by agreement in writing by the City, or except as otherwise provided herein. Upon the completion or termination of this Agreement for any reason, the City shall be entitled to receive, and Consultant shall promptly provide to the City upon request, all finished and unfinished project-related documents and materials, produced or gathered by or on behalf of Consultant that are in Consultant’s possession, custody or control. Consultant may retain copies of said documents and materials for its files. In the event of termination, any dispute regarding compensation or damages shall not hinder, prevent, or otherwise impact the City’s right to promptly receive and use such documents and materials which are the sole and exclusive property of the City.

6. TERMINATION

6.1 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, in its sole discretion, by giving notice in writing to Consultant not less than thirty calendar days prior to an effective termination date. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall have the right and obligation to immediately assemble the work then in progress for the purpose of completing the work and turning over all materials and documents to City.

6.2 In the event of such termination, Consultant shall be compensated for all work and services performed to the point of termination in accordance with the payment provisions set forth in Section 3.1, unless the termination is for cause, in which event Consultant need be compensated only to the extent required by law.

6.3 Upon notice of termination by City, the Consultant will immediately act to not incur any additional obligations, costs or expenses, except as may be reasonably necessary to terminate its activities. All finished or unfinished work or documents procured or produced under the Agreement will become property of the City upon the termination date. In the event of Consultant’s failure to perform pursuant to the Agreement, the City reserves the right to obtain services elsewhere and Consultant will be liable for t he difference between the prices set forth in the terminated Agreement and the actual cost to the City. Termination of the Agreement pursuant to this paragraph shall not relieve the Consultant of any liability to City for additional costs, expenses, 45 CC 04-02-2025
45 of 321

-6-
or damages sustained by City due to failure of the Consultant to perform pursuant to the Agreement. City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set off until such time as the exact amount of damages due City from Consultant is determine d. After the effective date of termination, Consultant will have no further claims against the City under the Agreement.

No other compensation will be payable for anticipated profit on unperformed services.

7. AUDIT AND INSPECTION
Consultant shall permit authorized representatives of City to inspect and audit all data and records relating to its performance under this Agreement for a period of three years following acceptance of the final study.

8. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
Consultant agrees to refrain from discriminatory employment practices on the basis of race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, handicap, sexual orientation, marital status, medical condition, disability, ancestry, organizational affiliation, military or veteran status, or any other consideration made unlawful by local, State or Federal law, of any employee of, or applicant for employment with, such Consultant or subcontractor. City requires Consultant to comply with all applicable Federal and State and local equal employment opportunity laws and regulations.

9. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

9.1 With respect to any design professional services provided by Consultant, the Consultant agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, and employees to the fullest extent allowed by law from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, damages, liabilities and losses, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, except for any claims, actions, causes of action, losses, damages or liabilities proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City. City shall not be liable for acts of Consultant in performing services described herein. Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the contrary, any defense costs charged to the design professional under this paragraph shall not exceed the design professional’s proportionate percentage of fault, except:

a. That in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with the other parties regarding unpaid defense costs in good faith effort to agree on the allocation of those costs amongst the parties; and

b. Where a project -specific general liability policy insures all project participants for general liability exposures on a primary basis and also covers all design professionals for their legal liability arising out of their professional services on a primary basis, then there shall be no limitation on the design professional's duty to provide a defense and cover the City's cost of defense.

46 CC 04-02-2025
46 of 321

-7-
With respect to all matters other than those covered by the foregoing paragraph, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City) and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, directors, agents representatives, volunteers, and employees to the fullest extent allowed by law from and against any and all claims, actions, causes of action, losses, damages, liabilities and costs of every nature , including attorneys’ fees and costs ( collectively, “Losses”) including but not limited to all claims, actions, causes of action, losses, damages, liabilities for property damage, bodily injury, or death, and all costs of defending any claim, caused by or arising out of, or alleged to have been caused by or arise out of, in whole or in part, Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, except for any claims, actions, causes of action, losses, damages, costs or liabilities proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City. City shall not be liable for acts of Consultant in performing services described herein.

In no event shall this section be construed to require indemnification by the Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California; and in the event that this contract is subject to California Civil Code section 2782(b), the foregoing indemnity provisions shall not apply to any liability for the active negligence of the City.

The defense and indemnity provisions obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity provisions are intended to fully allocat e the parties’ risk of liability to third - parties; and there shall be no rights to indemnity or contribution, in law or equity or otherwise between the parties that are not set forth in this section. Consultant waives all rights to subrogation for any matt ers covered by the provisions of this section. Consultant’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations as set forth in this section shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law.

9.2 Consultant shall maintain insurance conforming to the following specifications to the fullest amount allowed by law for a minimum of three (3) years following the termination or completion of this Agreement:

47 CC 04-02-2025
47 of 321

-8-
A. Types of Coverage
The policies shall afford the following types of coverage:

1. Commercial General Liability;

2. Automotive;

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer Liability; and

4. Professional Liability and/or Errors and Omissions
B. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. For Commercial General Liability: Insurance Services Office (ISO) CGL Form 00 01 11 85; and

2. For Automotive Liability: ISO CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1(any auto); and

3. For Workers’ Compensation: insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability insurance; and

4. For Professional Liability and/or Errors and Omissions: insurance covering negligence committed by or on behalf of Consultant in rendering services to City.

C. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers’ Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. The Worker’s Compensation policy must be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the Consultant 48 CC 04-02-2025
48 of 321

-9-
and its employees.

4. Professional Liability and/or Errors and Omissions: $1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 in the annual aggregate.

The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City (as agreed to in this Agreement) before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

D. Deductible and Self-Insured Retention
Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City, and shall not reduce the limits of liability. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guarantee ing payment of losses related to investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. Policies containing any self -insured retention provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City.

E. Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage:
a. The City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of this Agreement performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. It is a requirement of this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth in this Agreement shall be available to the City as an additional insured. Further more, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage limits specified in this Agreement, or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured, whichever is affords greater coverage. b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers.

Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
49 CC 04-02-2025
49 of 321

-10-
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers.
d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

2. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Coverage: The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City.

3. All Coverages: Any unintentional failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City; and unless otherwise approved by the City, each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by regular mail has been given to the City, or ten (10) days for cancellation for non-payment of premium.

F. Suspension or Cancellation
If any of the coverages required by this Agreement should be suspended, voided, cancelled or reduced in coverage during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately notify City and replace such coverage with another policy meeting the requirem ents of this Agreement.

G. Subcontractors
Consultant agrees that any and all contracts with subcontractors for performance of any matter under this Agreement shall require the subcontractors to comply with the same indemnity and insurance requirements set forth in this Agreement to the extent that they appl y to the scope of the subcontractors’ work. Subcontractors are to be bound to contractor and to City in the same manner and to the same extent as the Consultant is bound to City under this Agreement.

Subcontractors shall further agree to include these same provisions with any sub-subcontractor. A copy of this Agreement will be furnished to the subcontractor on request. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors to provide a valid certificate of insurance and the required endorsements included in the Agreement prior to commencing any work, and will provide proof of compliance to the City.

H. Acceptability of Insurers
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification provided hereunder, the policies of insurance listed in Article 9.2 of this Agreement are to be issued by an issuer with a current A.M. Best Rating of A:V and who is authorized to transact business in the State of 50 CC 04-02-2025
50 of 321

-11-
California, unless otherwise approved by the City.

I. Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with endorsements and certificates of insurance evidencing coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms acceptable to the City. Where required by statue, forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be submitted. All certificates are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.

J. Special Risks/Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances and provide notice to Consultant.

10. MISCELLANEOUS

10.1 This Agreement shall be binding on the heirs, executors, assigns and successors of Consultant.

10.2 Neither party may assign this Agreement, or any portion hereof, without the prior written consent of the other.

10.3 This Agreement shall not be construed to alter, affect, or waive any lien or stop notice rights, which Consultant may have for the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement.

10.4 Neither party’s waiver of any term, condition or covenant, or breach of any term, condition or covenant shall be construed as the waiver of any other term, condition or covenant or waiver of the breach of any other term, condition or covenant.

10.5 This Agreement contains the entire Agreement between City and Consultant relating to the project and the provision of services to the project. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth in this Agreement are of no force or effect.

Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both City and Consultant.

10.6 If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding on City and Consultant.

10.7 This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
51 CC 04-02-2025
51 of 321

-12-

10.8 All changes or amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and approved by all parties.

10.9 The initial contract term shall commence upon execution of the contract by the City and shall terminate December 31, 2025, unless terminated sooner in accordance with the contract.

10.10 Consultant owes the City a duty of undivided loyalty in performing the work and services under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the obligation to refrain from having economic interests and/or participating in activities that conflict with the City’s interests in respect to the work and/or services and project. The Consultant shall list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this Agreement. The Consultant hereby certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this agreement. Consultant shall not make or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant’s position to influence a governmental decis ion in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a direct or indirect financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. Consultant will immediately advise the City if Consultant learns of a financial interest of Consultant's during the term of this Agreement.

10.11 City is a public agency subject to the disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”). If Consultant’s proprietary information is contained in documents or information submitted to City, and Consultant claims that such information f alls within one or more CPRA exemptions, Consultant must clearly mark such information “Confidential and Proprietary,” and identify the specific lines containing the information. In the event of a request for such information, City will make best effo rts to provide notice to Consultant prior to such disclosure. If Consultant contends that any documents are exempt from the CPRA and wishes to prevent disclosure, it is required to obtain a protective order, injunctive relief or other appropriate remedy from a court of law in Santa Clara County before the City is required to respond to the CPRA request. If Consultant fails to obtain such remedy within the time the City is required to respond to the CPRA request, City may disclose the requested information without any liability to Consultant. Consultant further agrees that it shall defend, indemnify and hold City harmless against any claim, action or litigation (including but not limited to all judgments, costs, and attorney’s fees) that may result from denia l by City of a CPRA request for information arising from any representation, or any action (or inaction), by the Consultant.

10.12 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by an act of God, natural disaster, pandemic, acts of terrorism, war, or o ther peril, which is beyond the reasonable control of the affected party and without the negligence of the respective Parties. Each party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any Force Majeure claimed to delay, hinder or prevent performance of the services under this Agreement. Each Party will, however, make all reasonable efforts to remove or eliminate such a cause of delay or default and will, upon the cessation of the cause, diligently pursue performance of it s obligations in this Agreement. In the event either party is prevented or delayed in the performance of its respective obligation by reason of such Force Majeure, there may be an equitable adjustment of the schedule and Consultant compensation based on City’s sole discretion. 52 CC 04-02-2025
52 of 321

-13-

10.13 Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

10.14 Consultant warrants that Consultant, its subcontractors and/or agents (if any) has/have complied with any and all federal, state, and local licensing requirements

10.15 Each party acknowledges that it has reviewed this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement.

10.16 The signatories to this Agreement warrant and represent that each is authorized to execute this Agreement and that their respective signatures serve to legally obligate their respective representatives, agents, successors and assigns to comply with the provisions of this Agreement.

10.17 This Agreement is entered into, and to be performed in Santa Clara County, California, and any action arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be maintained in a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Santa Clara County, California.

10.18 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts which shall, in the aggregate, be deemed an original but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. A scanned, electronic, facsimile or other copy of a party’s signature shall be a ccepted and valid as an original.

11. NOTICES
Notices required under this Agreement may be delivered by first class mail addressed to the appropriate party at one of the following addresses:

CITY: City of Campbell
Attention: Rob Eastwood
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008

CONSULTANT: Good City Co,
Attention: Aaron Aknin
601 Allerton Street, Ste. 110
Redwood City, CA 94063

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
53 CC 04-02-2025
53 of 321

-14-
Having read and understood the foregoing Agreement, the undersigned parties agree to be bound hereby:

CONSULTANT

By: ________________________
Aaron Aknin

Title: Principal

CITY OF CAMPBELL

By: ______________________________
Brian Loventhal,

Title: City Manager

Aaron Aknin (Dec 5, 2024 10:19 PST)
54 CC 04-02-2025
54 of 321

-15-
Exhibit A

Scope of Services

Good City Company will provide consulting services to develop a study to analyze the feasibility of constructing shelter, temporary or emergency housing, or similar facility to support the unhoused population of the West Valley Area (Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno and Saratoga).

Good City Company will perform the following tasks:

1. Project Management: Nicholas Hamilton, Public Policy Lead, will be the project manager. As the project manager, Nick will serve as the primary point of contact and will facilitate the development of a workplan, meeting agendas and facilitation, and coordinating all aspects of the development of the feasibility study. Vera Gil, Housing Specialist, will serve as an associate project manager.

Nick and Vera will work closely together to plan and execute all analysis and recommendations throughout the development of the feasibility study. Aaron Aknin, Principal, will be the principal in charge for this engagement. Micaela Hellman- Tincher, Housing Specialist, will provide targeted support at key junctures of the project. Noa Kornbluh, Economic Development Associate, may provide additional support as needed.

Good City will develop a detailed project timeline with key milestones for the overall process and incorporate the Consultant schedule and tasks into the overall timeline. Nick will also work with staff to identify competing priorities (other policy initiatives, large development projects, etc.) occurring during the same period to determine a realistic completion timeline.

Good City will also create and maintain a shared project management dashboard to organize key dates, tasks, and information in an easy to access online format.

Deliverables: Written timeline, project dashboard.

2. Needs Analysis: Evaluating the existing unhoused population within the West Valley area as a whole to understand any unique demographic and service needs of the population. Specific actions will include:

a. Conducting a focus group among service providers with expertise in unhoused population of the West Valley (one).
b. Structured interviews to explore specific topics (two to three). 55 CC 04-02-2025
55 of 321
-16-
c. As part of its data gathering, Good City will request that the CoC data team provide Supportive Housing System Data Request Reports for the five West Valley cities. If, after reviewing these Reports, Campbell and Good City Company determine that they need additional data, they will request a meeting, and meet, with the COC data team to review their request.
d. Review relevant Housing Element program Implementation Actions.

Deliverables: Needs Analysis report. An initial draft for staff review, and final (public review) drafts will be prepared.

3. Feasibility Study: Good City will analyze and prepare recommendations concerning developing feasible temporary or emergency housing facilities and services to best serve the needs of the unhoused population. This work will include:
a. Evaluation of different types of facilities or services that could be established in the West Valley to service the unhoused, such as a new shelter or the use of an existing building as a shelter, using a network of hotel rooms to provide temporary housing, safe RV / Car park or sanctioned camping locations, or “tiny home” locations. Outreach to jurisdictions with recent experience will be conducted. b. Identification of service providers who could support the management of these facilities.
c. Identification of expected initial development and ongoing (annual) management costs.
d. Good City welcomes the opportunity to engage with LeSar Development Consultants to incorporate their insights and feedback at key junctures in the project.

Deliverables: Feasibility Study. An initial draft for staff review, Screen check, and final (public review) drafts will be prepared. The needs analysis will be included as an appendix to the feasibility study.

4. Project Meetings: Organize and facilitate bi-weekly check-in meetings to ensure clear communication among the City and Good City, share progress, seek input at key junctures of the project, and address issues promptly. Meet at key points in the project with County OSH staff. If desired, the project team can also meet with other jurisdictions of the West Valley group at key junctures throughout the project.
56 CC 04-02-2025
56 of 321

-17-
Deliverables: Meeting agendas and summaries of action items.

5. Public Meetings and Associated Materials: Good City will also support the City in stakeholder, community meetings, public hearings, and other events as necessary (in person or virtually). The proposal assumes up to two public meetings.

Deliverables: Written staff reports, related attachments, and presentations for Boards, Planning Commission, and City Council. This proposal assumes materials associated with two public meetings.

Responsibilities for City Staff and Good City Team:

1. Good City Responsibilities:
a. Lead project management, including planning, execution, and reporting. b. Conduct research, analysis, and key stakeholder engagement efforts. c. Prepare and present deliverables such as reports, and presentations; this includes presenting analysis and recommendations at Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
d. Coordinate with City staff to ensure alignment with the City's goals.

2. City Staff Responsibilities
a. Participate in biweekly virtual meetings to provide input and feedback on project progress.
b. Assist in acquiring relevant data and reports from stakeholder groups. c. Facilitate community engagement efforts by coordinating with local stakeholders, leading the development and implementation of any community workshops and announcements.
d. Review and approve deliverables including draft reports and public meeting materials in a timely manner.

57 CC 04-02-2025
57 of 321

-18-
Fee Schedule

The total estimate is $99,000, inclusive of a 10% contingency. The estimate is based on 2024 billing rates, which are subject to change on January 1st of each year. Rates for 2025 have not been set. This estimate assumes a 5% increase in rates for 2025 when calculating the hours and fees beginning January 1, 2025. However, specific rates will be circulated before January 1, 2025. A contingency is also included in case unexpected tasks are necessary. An approximate breakdown by team member, role, rate, hours, and estimated feed is provided in the table below. If a particular team member's time is not required for this project, another Good City team member may use the allocated hours instead.

Timeline

Team Member Role Hourly
Rate
Total
Hours Estimated Fees
Aaron Aknin Principal in Charge $260 30 $8,500
Nicholas Hamilton Project Manager $170 210 $38,000
Vera Gil Associate Project Manager $170 205 $36,500
Micaela Hellman-
Tincher Housing Specialist $170 25 $ 4,500
Noa Kornbluh Economic Development Associate $140 15 $ 2,500 Subtotal $ 90,000

Contingency (~10%) $ 9,000

Total $ 99,000

Task
Nov
2024
Dec
Jan
2025
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
1 Project
Management

Kickoff

2 Needs Analysis

Draft

Final

3 Feasibility Study

Draft
Screen
Check

Final
4 Project Meetings

5 Public Meetings
Study
Session

58 CC 04-02-2025
58 of 321
Good City CSA - Shelter Feasibility Study
Final Audit Report 2024-12-11
Created: 2024-12-05
By: Ken Ramirez ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAEGCv_1yfBREg0JZiAoaDXVCKOgj1CaEi "Good City CSA - Shelter Feasibility Study" History
Document created by Ken Ramirez ([email protected])
2024-12-05 - 6:05:08 PM GMT
Document emailed to Aaron Aknin ([email protected]) for signature 2024-12-05 - 6:05:15 PM GMT
Email viewed by Aaron Aknin ([email protected])
2024-12-05 - 6:18:49 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Aaron Aknin ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-12-05 - 6:19:17 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Brian Loventhal ([email protected]) for signature 2024-12-05 - 6:19:18 PM GMT
Email viewed by Brian Loventhal ([email protected]) 2024-12-10 - 4:26:06 PM GMT
Email viewed by Brian Loventhal ([email protected]) 2024-12-11 - 10:55:45 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Brian Loventhal ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-12-11 - 10:56:26 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024-12-11 - 10:56:26 PM GMT
59 CC 04-02-2025
59 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13828 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 9.

Subject: Consider the adoption of a City Council Special Project Policy Adopt Resolution No. 25-022 approving the City Council Special Project Policy CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/26/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
60 CC 04-02-2025
60 of 321

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting: April 2, 2025

Subject
Consider the adoption of a City Council Special Project Policy

Recommended Action
Adopt Resolution No. 25-XXX approving the City Council Special Project Policy

Background
The Budget Format review Draft Implementation Action Plan (IAP) report included a recommendation to draft a policy for City Council’s consideration on special projects. This policy is being brought before City Council ahead of the FY 2025 -26 Proposed Budget to ensure City Council has sufficient time to review and approve as requested by City Council.

In summary the new City Council Special Project policy governs the inclusion and tracking of Special Projects within the City’s budget process. This policy clarifies City Council's authority in approving special projects, ensures financial transparency, and establishes a framework for reporting on these projects.

Historically, Special Projects were included in the budget starting in FY 2013-14 to allow City Council to easily track high visibility projects or costs, such as development agreements and pavement maintenance. This process was then further broadened to include all one-time projects to provide the smoothing of material and contract trendlines and subsequently the City Work Program was also added.

The policy proposes to define Special Projects by:
 Defining what is and is not a Special Project
 When City Manager approval is necessary
 When City Council approval is necessary
 Establish a process for answering of City Council questions and,  Defining a method for tracking and reporting Special Projects

Sustainability Impact
No sustainability impact.

61 CC 04-02-2025
61 of 321

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact.

City Work Program (CWP) Item:

No.

CWP Item Description:

Not applicable.

Council Goal:

Public Engagement and Transparency
Fiscal Strategy

California Environmental Quality Act
Not applicable.
_____________________________________

Prepared by: Toni Oasay-Anderson, Acting Budget Manager Reviewed by: Kristina Alfaro, Director of Administrative Services Tina Kapoor, Deputy City Manager
Floy Andrews, City Attorney
Approved for Submission by: Pamela Wu, City Manager
Attachments:

A – City Council Special Project Policy
B – Draft Resolution
62 CC 04-02-2025
62 of 321

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL PROJECTS
POLICY

Citywide Policy Manual
Policy # TBD
Attachments:

N/A
Effective Date:

April 2, 2025, per Resolution 25-XX
Responsible Department:

Administrative Services
Related Policies & Notes City Council or Administrative Policy: City Council

Purpose
To establish City Council authority for the purpose and creation of Special Projects for inclusion and tracking as part the City’s budget process.

Special Projects are defined as one-time, staff-initiated projects that require City Council approval due to the need for budget appropriations that exceed a department’s base budget. Base budget items are the baseline appropriations to continue operations at the current level. In instances where there are sufficient budget appropriations the City Manager must request City Council authority in the form of a consent agenda item to reappropriate the funds as a special project. As discussed in the Special Project Reporting section below, these projects will continue to be reported in the Special Project reports.

Special Projects are not meant to track ongoing operational costs like street pavement maintenance, minor repairs, development projects which may span multiple fiscal years , or the purchase of equipment, unless the department needs to track these expenses because of the use of restricted funds to pay for the equipment or materials. Ongoing operational costs will be included in the department’s base budget or added as an ongoing budget appropriation request to the City Council.

Policy
This policy, including any amendments, shall be approved by City Council Resolution and shall be effective upon the policy’s adoption.

It is the objective of the City to ensure transparent financial reporting that allows Councilmembers, residents, and staff to track expenditures across multiple fiscal years.

This policy will be reviewed annually as part of the proposed budget process.

City Manager Authorization
As part of the City’s proposed budget process, departments must submit for approval any new one- time projects or initiatives that require additional funding. If approved by the City Manager, these projects are included in the proposed and final budget for City Council consideration and approval.

63 CC 04-02-2025
63 of 321

These requests are separate and are apart from the City Work Program (CWP) items, which are Council initiated and may be one-time and/or result in ongoing costs. Both types of projects require City Council appropriation approval.

City Council Approval and Questions
All Special Projects approved by the City Manager that require additional appropriations will be included in the proposed and final budgets for City Council approval. These projects will be presented and discussed during the budget process, and appropriations added upon approval.

Off cycle Special Project creation using the reappropriation of existing funds will be presented to City Council as a consent item for approval.

Any questions from City Council regarding Special Projects that are part of the regular Special Projects reporting process described in the section below will be answered as part of the supplemental report process . Questions that fall outside of the reporting process will be responded to in a timely manner based on the scope of the question.

Special Project Reporting
Special Projects will be included in the departmental narratives of the proposed and final budget. A summary of proposed Special Projects will be included in the summary section of the budget message and upon budget approval this list will be finalized as part of the final budget.

As part of the quarterly financial reports, staff will report on the following items for all Special Projects:
 Adoption Year
 Function - department that has the special project , for example Administration, which encompasses City Manager and City Attorney.
 Program - specific budget unit (e.g., 120 City Manager)  Base and Detail Account with Detail Account description – the expense account where the special project is budgeted, for example 750-.056 Neighborhood engagement. Special project account numbers are unique to one project.
 Full Org Set Code and Description – Includes full account string (Fund-Div-Program) and description of the org set. For example, 100-12-632, where the first three digits are the fund, the next two digits are the division, and the last three digits are the program in which the special project is budgeted. General Fund-City Manager-Comm Outreach & Neighborhood Watch.
 Amended Budget – This is the total budget in a fiscal year and includes new dollars added in proposed and any budgeted dollars that have been carried forward from the prior fiscal year as of a given date, for quarterly report they include Sept-30, Dec-31 and March-31.  Actual Amount – dollars spent as of a given date, see amended section above.  Encumbrance – dollars encumbered either through a contract or purchase order as of a given date.
 Status – This includes completed, in progress, not started, started, pending and cancelled. 64 CC 04-02-2025
64 of 321

 Outside Funding – identifies if outside funding is available like grants to fund the projects.  Estimated Completion – the date and month the Special Project is expected to be completed.  Notes – this includes information that staff would like to make the council and residents aware of and includes future plans like a project being carried over or defunded, along with other updates.

This quarterly financial report is meant to be informative, and the City Council is not required to approve or take any action, other than to receive the attachment as part of the financial report.

65 CC 04-02-2025
65 of 321
RESOLUTION NO. 25-________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING

CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL PROJECT POLICY

WHEREAS, the Cupertino City Council has identified a need to adopt a policy governing the creation of, acceptance of, and reporting of special projects; and

WHEREAS, on April 2, 2025, the City Council considered a proposed policy at a duly noticed regular meeting of the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:

1. The City Council hereby adopts the Cupertino City Council Special Project Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A . The Special Project Policy shall be effective on April 2, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of April, 2025, by the following vote:

Members of the City Council

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:

________
Liang Chao, Mayor
City of Cupertino

________________________
Date
ATTEST:

________

________________________
Date
66 CC 04-02-2025
66 of 321
Resolution No. __________________

Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk

67 CC 04-02-2025
67 of 321

CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13675 Agenda Date: 4/2/2025
Agenda #: 10.

Subject: Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan Receive presentation and provide input on the development of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 3/25/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
68 CC 04-02-2025
68 of 321

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting: April 2, 2025

Subject
Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan.

Recommended Action
Receive presentation and provide input on the development of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan.

Executive Summary
As part of the City of Cupertino's annual budget process, staff gather and develop proposals for new Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) projects. The City Council reviews these proposals and provides feedback. This process helps staff to refine and fully develop the annual CIP before presenting the proposal with the annual budget.

The Fiscal Year (FY) 25-26 CIP proposal is focused on providing safety through repair and revitalization of existing infrastructure to preserve existing facilities. In addition, the program aims to create future ongoing savings where possible. This approach aligns with the projected CIP funding of $2 million annually and focuses those funds on existing critical infrastructure.

Reasons for Recommendation
Development of the annual CIP is a multi-step process, as detailed briefly here:

• Annually Staff compiles the needs identified through internal proposals from City departments and divisions, and reviews planning documents (e.g., master plans, and existing facility assessments) to connect the CIP with the City’s strategic plans, as referred to in Attachment D. • April 2 City Council is presented with a draft CIP proposal and provides input on the proposed CIP and the five-year plan.
• April 3, 16 and
17 Staff reviews the CIP proposals with commissions that have goals that align with the projects. This year the Parks and Recreation Commission (4/3), Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission (4/16), and Sustainability Commission (4/17) will have CIP preview proposals on their April meeting agendas.
69 CC 04-02-2025
69 of 321
• April 22 Planning Commission verifies that the proposed CIP recommendations are in conformance with the General Plan. The CIP discussion will go to the Planning Commission on April 22. • May/June The proposed CIP item returns to the City Council as part of the adoption of the annual Operating Budget.

The proposed CIP generally includes a request for funding for current FY projects, as well as program support for the five-year plan. It is important to note that years two through five are included for planning purposes to identify potential future expenditures and workloads. These future projects are not funded with the approval of the FY 25-26 CIP.

Background
A capital improvement project is a project that enhances a unit of property, restores, or prolongs the useful life of a unit of property, or adapts the unit of property to a new or different use. The CIP Division of Public Works provides planning, design, procurement, and construction administration for all CIP projects including streets, sidewalks, storm drainage, buildings, parks, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and other public facilities. The division ensures that the design and construction of the public improvements occur in accordance with community expectations, and applicable City and State of California standards. The CIP division places public health and safety as the highest priority in the planning and delivery of CIP projects.

The City has several types of projects. A key factor that defines a CIP project, as opposed to maintenance projects, Special Projects, City Work Program (CWP) projects, or other capital initiatives, is the need for professional design services that require specialized expertise, analysis, or documentation. While CIP projects are typically focused on design and construction, there are instances where planning processes, such as feasibility studies or analysis projects, also require design and engineering services, classifying them as CIP projects. These general guidelines vary depending on the specifics of each project.

Project Priorities
Project prioritization is used as a tool to inform decisions regarding funding and the scheduling of resources. Staff evaluate and rank new project proposals based on the factors listed below. The highest priority is given to projects that require repair of existing facilities to address public health and safety and to protect public and private property. Other factors, including available funding and resources to complete a project, are then considered within the context of other City goals.

Below is the criterion used:

//

70 CC 04-02-2025
70 of 321
TABLE 1: PRIORITIES FOR CIP PROJECTS, LEGEND

• Health and Safety: assets that require repair or upgrading to protect public health and safety, including protection of public and private property, take highest priority.

Example: Repair of Stormwater Drain Outfalls is a high priority to avoid further deterioration of public/private property.

• Council, Commissions, and Community Priorities: Incorporates Council priorities, suggestions from Commissions, and Community input.

Example: Lawrence-Mitty Trail and Park project is prioritized by the City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, and members of the public.

• Master Plan Priorities: The City’s master plans have many stated goals and policies that affect the generation of CIP projects. Staff reviews the goals found in these documents, including stated priorities of commissions.

Example: Projects to remove natural gas appliances from the City’s facilities are prioritized by the Climate Action Plan as part of the City’s decarbonization initiatives.

• Ongoing phases: some projects advance as subsequent phases of existing/completed projects.

Example: Regnart Road Improvements, Phase 2 project is a subsequent phase of the overall Regnart Road Improvements project, initiated in FY 16-17.

• Fiscally Responsible: Improvements or projects that enhance fiscally responsible use of City resources, including staff time and City funds. Projects that have secured (or could secure) outside funding, such as grants, are also given priority.

Example: The Bollinger Road Corridor Design project is included in the CIP because the majority of the study will be funded through a grant.

Staff Recommendations
71 CC 04-02-2025
71 of 321
Using the priorities listed above, the following list identifies projects proposed for the FY 25-26 CIP:

TABLE 2: PROPOSED FY25-26 CIP PROJECTS
A. New Projects:

Project name Project Description FY25-26
Funding

INTERNAL EXTERNAL
ADA
(Americans
with Disabilities
Act)
Improvements
(Annually
funded)
This is an ongoing program,
funded annually, to improve
accessibility of public
facilities throughout the
City.
$110,000 $110,000 $0
Citywide
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
(FCA)
Implementation
Implement priority
recommendations identified
in the Facility Condition
Assessment reports. This is
an ongoing initiative due to
the extent of improvements
needed throughout City
buildings.
$940,000 $940,000 $0
Outfall Repairs Repair various storm drain
outfalls following the
recommendations of the
2024 Storm Drain Outfalls
Assessment.
$950,000 $950,000 $0
subtotal $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0

Existing projects are reviewed annually in the context of fiscal responsibility to confirm that continuing the project is the best course of action. Attachment A has more detail on all existing projects, including a review to possibly defund projects. The review of existing projects this year has resulted in a recommendation to retain all existing projects and their current funding.

Project narratives for each of the newly proposed projects can be found in Attachment B.

Attachment C is the fiscal summary table for the FY 25-26 CIP and five-year plan.

Attachment D provides information about projects suggested in each of the City’s master plans.

Projects completed in FY 24-25, or which are scheduled for completion this year include:
• Blackberry Farm Pool Improvements
• De Anza Boulevard Buffered Bike Lanes
• McClellan Road Separated Bike Corridor, Phase 3
72 CC 04-02-2025
72 of 321
• Vai Avenue Outfall - Repairs*
• All-Inclusive Play Area & Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility at Jollyman Park** *The existing outfall was temporarily repaired, but the larger project to replace the outfall has not yet occurred. Refer to Attachment A for a summary of the project. *Project that is projected to be complete by July 2025

Staff anticipate that these projects will underspend their respective budgets by approximately $200,000. These underspent funds will be returned to the Capital Reserve (or other appropriate accounts based on the original source of any restricted funds).

Public Works and Finance staff work together as part of the year-end process to close out completed projects, presenting this information as part of the first quarter report for the following fiscal year.

Five-Year CIP Plan
TABLE 3: PROPOSED FY 25-26 CIP FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROJECTS
Note: Greyed text in Years 2-5 illustrates 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
ADA
Improvements
(Annually funded)
$110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000
Citywide Facilities
Condition
Assessment (FCA)
Implementation
$940,000 $2,300,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Outfalls Repairs $950,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 BBF Golf
Renovation:
minimal repairs
$1,433,250 $1,504,880 $1,580,150 $1,659,158
totals $2,000,000 $3,015,000* $1,720,000 $3,305,150* $1,730,000 * Current annual CIP funding is $2M/year. Project estimates may be refined prior to requested CIP funding. Proposed annual CIP funding that exceeds $2M/year will require additional funds beyond the $2M annual funding being allocated to the program. Where possible, staff will search for external funding to address funding requests of more than $2M.

In summary, the proposed FY 25-26 CIP includes ongoing funding for two existing facilities projects and funding for storm drain utility repairs. The projects proposed this year are a result of information from existing facility assessments, which show the need for extensive improvements and repairs to the City’s aging infrastructure. Due to the extensive nature of the work needed, staff envision some of these projects becoming regular or even annual requests for the foreseeable future. The program has 28 existing 73 CC 04-02-2025
73 of 321
projects that are a priority to close out. This year, the proposal for new projects was driven by the need to implement health and safety-driven projects and was further impacted by limited staffing resources and $2 million in funding.

The proposed five-year plan focuses on rehabilitating critical infrastructure that has aged beyond its life cycle. While the City has focused its rehabilitation efforts in recent years on revitalizing its pavement condition, the City must now shift some of this focus onto its buildings and storm drain system to address public health and safety issues.

Sustainability Impact
Future projects will be evaluated for sustainability impacts as they are developed.

Fiscal Impact
The FY 25-26 proposal for CIP includes an allocation of $2 million for new and annually funded projects from the Capital Reserve. Should grant funds be awarded, staff will return to City Council to make the necessary budget adjustments. If the proposal for FY 25-26 CIP is approved, the Capital Reserve is estimated to be $8.53 million in available fund balance for the CIP. The $8.53 million balance includes the $5 million minimum reserve balance for the fund (refer to Attachment E).

City Work Program (CWP) Item: No

CWP Item Description: N/A

Council Goal: N/A

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
No CEQA impact.

_____________________________________

Prepared by: Susan Michael, Capital Improvement Programs Manager Reviewed by: Chad Mosley, Director of Public Works
Reviewed by: Tina Kapoor, Deputy City Manager
Reviewed by: Floy Andrews, City Attorney
Approved for Submission by: Pamela Wu, City Manager

Attachments:

A – FY 24-25 CIP Status and FY 25-26 Proposal
B – FY 25-26 CIP Project Narratives
C – FY 25-26 CIP Fiscal Summary Table and Five-year Projected Plan D - Master Plans Project Lists
E - Capital Reserve Information
74 CC 04-02-2025
74 of 321

ATTACHMENT A
FY2024 – 2025 CIP Status and FY2025 – 2026 CIP Proposal

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contains 28 active projects.

Four projects were successfully completed this fiscal year, with one additional project scheduled to be completed prior to July 2025. The FY 25-26 CIP proposal considers the current staffing levels and ensures that future projects are planned in a way that aligns with available resources for effective execution.

This document provides a summary of the existing projects, broken into five categories of projects, for ease of discussion. Within each section on the type of project, you will find a summary of the existing projects, proposed projects, unfunded projects, projects that can be defunded, and the five-year plan for each of the categories.

CIP projects typically fall into four categories: Parks, Streets and Infrastructure, Transportation, and Facilities. This year we are introducing a fifth category – Sustainability projects. It is a more accurate reflection of the City’s goals to highlight efforts towards Sustainability and Resilience.

LEGEND:
1 Facilities: Yellow
2 Parks: Green
3 Streets and Infrastructure: Orange
4 Transportation/ Bike and Pedestrian: Blue
5 Sustainability: Maroon

Allocation of each project into a ‘category’ does not have financial implications and many projects could be placed into more than one category. However, the classification is useful for reviewing the distribution of funds to the type of assets receiving capital improvements.

Wherever possible, we use color coding to illustrate the project category, as indicated in the list above.
75 CC 04-02-2025
75 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 2 of 40

CIP: FACILITIES
City of Cupertino
76 CC 04-02-2025
76 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 3 of 40

1. Facilities
A. Existing Facilities CIP Projects: There are two funded and active CIP projects that are considered Facilities projects, and three other funded projects that are in the queue.

TABLE 1 – ACTIVE FACILITIES CIP PROJECTS
# Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project Total Remaining
Funds*
F1 ADA
Improvements
(Annually
funded)
This is an ongoing program,
funded annually, to improve
accessibility at all public
facilities throughout the City.

FY15-16 $970,000 $970,000 $191,990
F2 Citywide
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
Implementation
(FCA)
Implement priority
recommendations identified in
the Facility Condition
Assessment reports.

FY18-19 $1,000,000 $2,429,890 $1,536,282
CAP FY22-23 $6,470
City funding FY23-24 $1,000,000
CDBG FY23-24 $367,951
CDBG FY24-25 $55,469
F3Q City Hall Annex Program, plan and build facility
improvements required for
interim facility to accommodate
staff while City Hall is
remodeled, as well as the long-
term use of this facility.

Queued awaiting direction on
City Hall facility development.

FY21-22 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $1,872,539
F4Q City Hall
Improvements
Programming, Feasibility and
Community Outreach to form
the basis of a renovation
strategy for the buildings.

Queued pending revised
Council direction, especially
concerning financial strategy.

FY21-22 $500,000 $500,000 $378,036
F5Q Library
Expansion
Project
(landscaping
and other misc.
scope)
Develop a design and construct
a 5600 SF addition to the
existing Library building. Grant
funding (CPF, Ro Khanna)
planned to complete the
courtyard and exterior
landscaping scopes of work.

Queued due to staffing
resources.

FY19-20 $8,705,438 $9,705,438 $1,391,910
CPF FY24-25 $1,000,000
subtotal $16,605,328 $16,605,328 $4,370,757
77 CC 04-02-2025
77 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 4 of 40
*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

Facilities Condition Assessment Project
In 2018 the “Comprehensive Facility Condition and Use Efficiency Assessment” report was completed. This report was updated in 2022 by the “Facility Condition Assessment” (FCA). The FCA reviewed 48 facilities at 24 locations. The report identified $28.8 million of renewal projects, with $4 million in priority one projects. The 2022 FCA report explained that “…conditions in this [priority one] category require immediate action to: a) correct a cited safety hazard, b) stop accelerated deterioration, and/or c) return a facility to operation. Deficiencies in this category should be addressed in 0-12 Months.”

Since the updated report was issued, six projects have been initiated: Senior Center Fire Alarm system (FAS) upgrade, Quinlan Community Center (QCC) AC Chiller replacements, Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms improvements, and the replacement of three flat roofs at Sports Center, QCC, and Senior Center. Other completed FCA projects include: Sports Center Fire Control Center panel replacement, and the Sports Center Seismic Retrofit.

The cost estimates in the report are based on 2022 figures, and an escalation rate of roughly 5% per year should be applied to account for the projected cost of incomplete projects. This leads to a 21.55% escalation for 2026. The current approved project funding, including the $423,420 in CDBG funding (designated specifically for Senior Center improvements), totals $2,429,890. Of this, $41,342 remains unencumbered and available for new projects.

The highest-priority projects include upgrades to life-safety systems at five facilities, estimated to cost approximately $890,000. The FY25-26 FCA project funding request is for an additional $940,000.

Improvements to the Library life-safety systems are also needed, as are repairs to the Sports Center Shower and Locker rooms. It is planned to request additional funding for those projects in FY26-27.

TABLE 2 – FCA PROJECT FISCAL SUMMARY

FUNDING TO DATE:

FY19 City funds $1,000,000
FY23 CAP funds $6,470
FY24 City funds $1,000,000
FY24 CDBG grant $367,951
FY25 CDBG grant $55,469
subtotal (a) $2,429,890

78 CC 04-02-2025
78 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 5 of 40
Current & Completed Projects:

Completed FCA Projects (Sports Center Fire
Control Panel and Seismic Retrofit) $502,528
QCC Chillers Replacement $350,000
Sports Center Roof $391,600
QCC Flat Roof $462,000
Senior Center Flat Roof $200,000
Sports Center Shower Rooms – Design only $59,000
Senior Center FAS Upgrade (CDBG) $367,951
Senior Center HVAC replacement (CDBG) $55,469
(subtotal (b) $2,388,548
Uncommitted project funds (a-b): $41,342

Proposed FY25-26 FCA Projects:

Monta Vista - Pre-School Building FAS $75,128
Creekside Park Recreation Building FAS $40,447
Monta Vista - Gymnastics Building FAS $216,842
Service Center Administration Building FAS $164,032
Sports Center FAS $386,928
subtotal (c) $883,377
Uncommitted project funds (a-b): $41,342
FY25-26 proposal request (c-a-b): $842,035

requesting
$940,000

FY26-27 FCA Projects:

Library FAS $1,309,738
Sports Center Showers & Locker Rooms $900,000
$2,209,738

B. FY25-26 Proposed Facilities CIP Projects:

TABLE 3 – PROPOSED FY25-26 FACILITIES CIP PROJECTS
# Project name Project Description FY25-26
Funding
F1 ADA
Improvements
(Annually funded)
This is an ongoing program, funded
annually, to improve accessibility
of public facilities throughout the
City.
$110,000
F2 Citywide Facilities
Condition
Assessment
Implementation
(FCA)
Implement priority
recommendations identified in the
Facility Condition Assessment
reports.
$940,000

$1,050,000

79 CC 04-02-2025
79 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 6 of 40
C. Evaluation of Facilities CIP Projects to Defund:

The FCA projects are critical health and safety improvements to existing facilities. ADA improvements are similarly critical, and federal mandates require that the City continues to make improvements to accessibility to public facilities. The work remaining on the Library Expansion project is completely grant-funded. The City does not recommend defunding any of these projects.

D. Unfunded Facilities CIP Projects:

In the past five years, several projects have been proposed and remain unfunded. The list that follows notes the years projects were proposed and projected cost in FY25-26 dollars.

TABLE 4 – UNFUNDED FACILITIES CIP PROJECTS
Project FY
proposed
Project Description Projected
Cost
City Hall project FY20-21 Design and Construction, following programmatic development for renovation or replacement of the
existing facility, including parking facilities. The
existing building requires seismic retrofit, the
infrastructural systems are antiquated, and the
space planning is not appropriate for current
workplace practices. Parking areas require
expansion.
$30M to
$90M*
City Hall Annex –
Additional
Funding
FY21-22 Program, plan and build facility improvements
required for interim facility to accommodate staff
while City Hall is remodeled, as well as the long-
term use of this facility.
$5M - $8M
Stocklmeir,
Blesch and Blue
Pheasant
properties
FY19-20 Programming, Community Outreach, Design and
Construction of the Stocklmeir property and
adjacent facilities.
$1.2M
*Note: Estimated costs reported in 2022 for the renovation of the facility that included seismic reinforcement to meet ‘essential facility’ requirements, HVAC, electrical, life/safety, and IT systems replacements and a complete interior renovation were reported as $29M. Performing the same scope at a level of ‘non-essential’ facility was estimated at $27M, in 2025. Cost estimates should be revisited, in light of current market conditions. The upper end of the projected cost was for a replacement City Hall building as envisioned in the Civic Center Master Plan.

City Hall
Since the seismic issues following the 1986 renovation were discovered, numerous plans and master plans have been developed. Improvements to the building alone do not address the parking limitations. Options to rework civic center have been investigated and analyzed. City Hall renovation a significant project, both culturally and economically, that has stalled due to the ongoing debates on the appropriate magnitude and scope of the project.

Renovation Option: $30M + $5M parking
80 CC 04-02-2025
80 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 7 of 40
Renovate the City Hall building within the existing footprint, using the existing structure and site plan. While the driving force of the scope will be the seismic upgrade, the development triggers accessibility (ADA) and infrastructure requirements.

Additionally, the interior layout of the space does not meet the needs of the workforce or the community. An interior renovation to create community meeting spaces and an updated workplace will be necessary. In this scenario, it is possible to consider adding a story within the confines of the existing footprint. This will have additional cost but will allow for more flexibility in programming the interior uses of the space.

The Civic Center regularly has a shortage of parking spaces due to the popularity of the Cupertino Library and events held at both the library and Community Hall. To increase the number of parking spaces, above-ground, below-ground, or off-site options would need to be considered in this scenario. A separate project could be generated that analyzes feasible options for parking.

• PROS: less time and effort in the design phase, less expensive for the building project (the overall cost, if considering the parking solutions, may be a significant additional cost).
• CONS: Building renovations are complicated projects with significant financial investment. Compromises in programming are made to work within the confines of the original enclosure. An additional parking area is not included within the building footprint and would require additional dedicated funding.

Replacement Option: up to $80M
Using the 2015 Civic Center Master Plan as the foundation, replace City Hall and portions of the Civic Center with a new building and integrated parking to better meet the needs of the community, providing more engaging community spaces and a more effective workplace for the City business.

• PROS: more effective spatial and economic solutions are possible, making City Hall and Civic Center a functional hub for the City. Adding underground parking would be a priority.
• CONS: A new building and parking structure may be as much as 2 times more expensive than a building renovation project without parking. The design of a new facility will typically require a lengthy and costly public engagement process in addition to the design and construction process.

If Council wishes to activate the City Hall project,
(a) additional funding for design and construction, and additional staffing would be required.
(b) direction on the scope of work would be required (renovation of the existing facility, renovation of the existing with an added story, renovation to essential services structural level.

81 CC 04-02-2025
81 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 8 of 40
City Hall Annex
The City Hall Annex property was purchased in 2021, and the renovation project for the facility was funded at $3M in FY21-22. The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous uses, including a satellite and/or interim City Hall facility. Council approved proceeding with the renovation of the facility to function as an interim facility for City staff while the City Hall building was under construction.

The program centered on providing workplace and transactional areas for the public-facing Permit Center and some Finance/Business transactions that bring the public to City Hall regularly. The Council approved adding the Emergency Operations Center to the program in late 2022, since the preliminary cost estimates reported that this upgrade of the scope would cost an additional $500,000.

When the EOC scope was added, staff made the decision to delay the request for additional project funding for the added scope until the project was ready to award a contract to a general contractor for construction so that more definitive costs would be discussed. However, when cost estimates on the 65% set of drawings and specifications came in at $6.7M in 2024, the decision was made to pause the project until the City Hall project direction was decided, so that priorities and cost-cutting measures could be evaluated in a fuller context. An updated scope of work, with value-engineering options, and cost estimate would be required to continue work on the project.

With the news of the inflated costs, numerous options were investigated, from scope reductions to a completely reduced program of ‘carpet-and-paint’ only, and other code required renovations such as accessible entries. The most reduced scope of work was estimated at $2M.

While developing the program for the City Hall Annex building as City’s Permit Center and EOC, staff identified additional cost impacts, including:
• Increase of construction costs due to the addition of the EOC program and infrastructure. The early estimate was that the addition of the EOC would add approximately $500,000 in construction costs.
• Increase of soft costs due to the addition of the EOC program. Cost estimate for soft costs is approximately $1.5M, leaving $1.5M for construction (which is less than required, see below).
• An overall increase in the original construction estimate excluding the addition of an EOC. Staff has learned that the original construction cost estimate for the overall project was too low. 2023 estimates for 2024 construction were estimated at $6.7M without moving/logistics cost, furniture, and other contingencies accounted for.

In order to move forward with the renovation of the City Hall Annex, Council must approve additional funding for the project. Staff is in the process of developing an updated cost estimate that includes options for Council’s consideration.

Stocklmeir, Blesch and Blue Pheasant properties (scope and cost unknown) 82 CC 04-02-2025
82 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 9 of 40
Many options for the Stocklmeir property have also been pursued in the years since the property was purchased. Some residents have expressed their desire to make the property into a museum for 1930’s farm life. The Cupertino Historical Society (CHS) and Rotary Club have made proposals in the past to facilitate projects at the site, but for various reasons including funding concerns, nothing has moved forward. Improvements to the facilities are complicated by its location within a special flood hazard area, and many challenges to provide an accessible facility.

In order to move forward with a project at the Stocklmeir, Blesch and/or Blue Pheasant properties, Council should provide direction on the type of facility or project desired and allocate funding and additional staffing resources for the project.

E. Facilities CIP - Five-Year Plan

TABLE 5 – 5-YEAR PLAN FOR FACILITIES CIP PROJECTS
Note: Grey text in Years 2-5 illustrate 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
ADA
Improvements
(Annually
funded)
$110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000
Citywide
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
Implementation
(FCA)
$940,000 $2,300,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 City Hall Annex1 $8,000,000 $8,400,000 $8,820,000 $9,261,000 $9,724,050 City Hall
project1
(Renovation)
$40,000,000 $42,000,000 $44,100,000 $46,305,000 $48,620,250 subtotals $1,050,000 $2,415,000 $1,120,000 $1,125,000 $1,130,000 1 City Hall, City Hall Annex, and Stocklmeir, Blesch and Blue Pheasant properties projects are major projects – staff awaits Council’s direction for inclusion in the five-year plan.

FY25-26: The ADA Improvements project and FCA project are essentially ongoing projects, renewed annually. Addressing the most critical deficiencies identified in the 2022 FCA is a priority, especially life-safety systems. The current FCA projects, the Senior Center Fire Alarm system (FAS) upgrades, Quinlan Community Center Chiller replacements, and the flat roof replacements at QCC, Sports Center and Senior Center will be completed in FY25-26. If 83 CC 04-02-2025
83 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 10 of 40
approved, the additional FY25-26 funding will be directed to FAS upgrades at five facilities noted in Table 2.

FY26-27: CIP will request additional funding to replace the FAS in the Cupertino Library building, and to complete the renovations to the Sports Center shower and locker rooms. In this fiscal year we may be able to coordinate these projects with infrastructure improvements at the Library to electrify the appliances, improve energy efficiency, and increase the resiliency of the facility to better serve the community as a cooling/heating center. Public Works (PW) staff is currently working with Santa Clara County Library District (SCCLD) and the Santa Clara County (SCC) to develop a program and technical requirements for this initiative.

FY26-27: When the CIP division successfully fills the two open positions currently under recruitment, work will resume on the Library Expansion project. The work at the Library is funded by a $1 million grant secured by Congressman Ro Khanna. Anticipated completion of the project is in 2027.

FY27-28 and onwards: addressing the highest priority projects in the FCA will be ongoing for both CIP and the Operations staff. More roof repairs are needed and FAS, HVAC systems, and other critical systems need improvements. The FCA project may help to address additional improvements to the various Recreation facilities (Sports Center, McClellan Ranch Preserve, Blackberry Farm, Senior Center, Quinlan Community Center) that could improve accessibility and infrastructure, advancing safety, functionality, and revenue-generating capacity of these facilities.

The CIP welcomes the opportunity to take on projects to renovate or replace City Hall and the City Hall Annex. These are significant investments, both financially and on staffing resources, that must be considered in conjunction with the overall City annual budget and financing options. If these projects do have the support of Council and the community, CIP will require an additional senior-level full-time employee (FTE) to manage those projects.

84 CC 04-02-2025
84 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 11 of 40

CIP: PARKS
City of Cupertino
85 CC 04-02-2025
85 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 12 of 40

2. Parks
A. Existing Parks CIP Projects: There are four funded and active CIP projects that are considered Parks projects, and one other funded project that is in the queue.

TABLE 6 - ACTIVE PARKS CIP PROJECTS
# Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project
Total
Remaining
Funds*
P1 All-Inclusive Play
Area & Adult-
Assistive
Bathroom Facility
(Jollyman Park)
At Jollyman Park, Design and
construct an all-inclusive
playground and an adult-assistive
bathroom facility adjacent to the
new AIPG. (Externally Funded, in
part)
FY18-19 $1,230,000 $4,891,347 $257,024
SCC AIPG grant FY18-19 $1,448,201
CA P&R grant FY21-22 $1,000,000
PG&E donation FY21-22 $25,000
Adult-assistive bathroom added FY22-23 $850,000
Art In-lieu fees FY23-24 $338,146
P2 Lawrence-Mitty
Park and Trail
Plan
Design and construct a new
neighborhood park. Located on

7.8 acres adjacent to Saratoga
Creek, near the intersection of
Lawrence Expressway and Mitty
Way.

FY18-19 $8,270,994 $6,850,909 $4,422,565
Acquisition & Annexation FY21-22 -$2,330,085
Berm Clean-up FY23-24 $910,000
P3 Park Amenity
Improvements
Funding for various park
amenities such as benches,
hydration stations, outdoor table
tennis, cornhole, shade
structures, pickleball striping,
etc. (3yrs funding x $200K)
FY20-21 $600,000 $600,000 $417,460
P4 MRP West
Parking Lot
Improvements
(Habitat
monitoring
continues to
2028)
*Only habitat monitoring is active.

Design and construct a new
“green” meadow-style parking lot
that is compatible with the creek
environment at McClellan Ranch
West, which was designed to
have minimal impact to the site.

FY16-17 $400,000 $1,069,682 $1,611
City Funding FY17-18 $550,000
City Funding FY18-19 $119,682
P5Q Annual
Playground
Replacement
Replacement of older playground
equipment that is dated and
worn. (5yrs funding x $300K)
FY20-21 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $913,755

subtotal $14,911,938 $14,911,938 $6,012,415
86 CC 04-02-2025
86 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 13 of 40
*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

• The Jollyman Park All-Inclusive Playground is under construction and will be completed before summer 2025.
• Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail is in the design phase. As part of the due diligence for this project, we are generating cost estimates based on the schematic design progress and will return to City Council for review before advancing the design process further. • The Park Amenity Improvements project continues to supply new benches, picnic tables, and other vital features to parks as required.
• The Annual Playground Replacement project will activate once CIP recruitments are successful. Varian Park, Little Rancho Park and Canyon Oak Park are targets for improvements.

B. FY25-26 Proposed Parks CIP Projects: none.

C. Evaluation of Parks CIP Projects to defund:
• The Jollyman AIPG is nearing completion.
• The Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail project is in contract through to the end of design and documentation. The funding for the project comes from a developer agreement that would need to be revisited if defunding were to be considered. • The Park Amenity Improvements project could be defunded but has been a valuable resource to address needed improvements and community requests/concerns in our parks. • The Playground Replacement project could be defunded since we are not in-contract presently, but the need to replace our aging playgrounds persists as an ongoing safety concern. If not replaced, many playgrounds will need to be closed, at least in part. • The habitat monitoring at the McClellan Ranch Preserve west parking lot is a requirement of the project’s California Department of Fish and Wildlife permit.

The City does not recommend defunding any of these projects.

D. Unfunded Parks CIP Projects:

In the past five years, several projects have been proposed and remain unfunded. The list that follows notes the years proposed and projected cost in FY25-26 dollars.

//

//

//

87 CC 04-02-2025
87 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 14 of 40
TABLE 7 – UNFUNDED PARKS CIP PROJECTS
Project FY
proposed
Project Description Projected
Cost
Park Shade
Structures
FY23-24 Five locations: Creekside, Portal, Linda Vista, BBF Bocce, and Jollyman. Planned for FY25-26, as noted in the FY24-25 CIP program. Grant funding was not obtained, however. Providing more shade opportunities is a stated priority of the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan (PRSMP) but due to limited resources and other priorities, this project was removed from the 5-year CIP plan. $1.3M
BBF Golf Course
Irrigation
FY24-25 Replacement of the irrigation system is a high priority; however, it is likely that this will be a major project. Prioritized for its potentially strong sustainable infrastructure and improvement of natural habitat, thus addressing the goals of the CAP and the PRSMP. The projects were planned for FY25-26, as noted in the FY24-25 CIP program, however staffing resources and funding remain limited. Staff will look for potential external funding for the project prior to proposing this in future CIP plans.
$2.5M
BBF Golf Course
Pond Restoration
FY24-25 The area of the BBF Golf course that was a pond, is visibly undeveloped. This project proposes to replant the area low-water native species.
$1.53M
Memorial Park
projects derived
from 2024 MPSP
FY25-26 MPSP offered a considerable list of potential projects, including the phasing of certain areas and types of amenities. Priorities from the Community and P&R staff:
• Extended Senior Center Deck/Plaza
• New Restroom and upgrade Existing Restrooms
• Bocce Court
• Upgraded Parking Lots (2)
• Upgraded Amphitheater and Stage
• Reservable Picnic Area (Align with PV work)
However, due to limited resources and other priorities, no projects from this plan are proposed at this time.

Varies
Memorial Park
projects: All-
Inclusive
Playground
FY25-26 Grant funding may be available from Santa Clara County for an All- Inclusive Playground. Staff will propose this project if external funding becomes available.
$5M
Memorial Park
projects: Softball
Field Lighting
FY25-26 The current system has exceeded its useful lifecycle and replacement parts are difficult to obtain. Staff will monitor the system and will propose a project when required.
$250,000 to
$500,000
Park Pathways
Paving
FY24-25 Add and/or improve pathways at 8 parks: Three Oaks Park, Creekside Park, Wilson Park, Hoover Park (new), Jollyman Park, Portal Park, Somerset Park, and Varian Park. Improvements to existing park pathways, converting a majority of the paths from asphalt to concrete, improving lighting in limited locations, and design and installation of new pathways in some parks. New pathways are a low priority, PW Operations may propose Special Project funding to repair existing paths as needed.
$1.2M
88 CC 04-02-2025
88 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 15 of 40
Blackberry Farm
Family Restroom
Conversion
FY25-26 This project aims to better serve the community by converting one of Blackberry Farm's four restrooms into a family restroom and pool changing area. Blackberry Farm is a popular pool and park facility, and is frequented by families with young children. As a result, there is a high demand for a family restroom and changing area. This project is a priority of the Parks and Recreation Department to address public requests.
$500,000
Blackberry Farm
Golf Course
Restroom
Renovation
FY25-26 The restrooms at the BBF Golf Course have not been upgraded since 1991. They are dilapidated, require ongoing maintenance, and customers routinely complain about them. The golf course is a high-usage facility with more than 40,000 rounds of golf played each year. A full renovation is required to meet accessibility and building code requirements. Minor maintenance and replacement fixtures are proposed in the FY 25-26 proposed budget to address some of these needs.
$500,000
Blackberry Farm
Entrance
Improvements
FY25-26
FY19-20
The entrance to Blackberry Farm needs better pedestrian facilities.

Access improvements were unanimously endorsed by City Council in 2015. The Parks and Recreation Commission prioritized this project as a high priority for the 2019 CIP plan. The project has also been noted in the 2006 Stevens Creek Master Plan and Restoration Plan, the 2016 Stevens Creek Master Plan draft, the 2016 Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan and was the justification for the City’s purchase of the Byrne residential property and dedication.
$2M to $3M
Blackberry Farm
Play Area
Improvements
FY19-20,
FY25-26
The current playground needs improvements to meet modern standards. Its small size limits capacity, particularly during peak usage by summer camps and school groups. The perimeter shows signs of wear, requiring reinforcement to ensure safety and stability. New scope would include a resilient play surface and nature play elements.
$300,000
McClellan Ranch
Preserve Barn
Renovation
FY19-20,
FY25-26
Repair and rehabilitate the McClellan Ranch Preserve Barn to enhance safety, preserve its historical significance, support educational activities, and facilitate community engagement. The McClellan Ranch Preserve Barn Evaluation & Conceptual
Renovation Plan was adopted by City Council in 2014. The barn is in a dilapidated state and for safety reasons should be improved. $4M
Linda Vista Park
Improvements
FY19-20 Upgrades to park amenities and playgrounds. TBD Portal Park
Improvements
FY19-20 The existing building is not useful in its current configuration, and parking is not adequate to support activities.

TBD
New
Neighborhood
Parks
FY19-20 The acquisition of land and development of new parks can be reconsidered after Lawrence-Mitty is completed. No report for potential sites and/or feasibility has been completed.

TBD
Little Rancho
picnic area
FY25-26 PW/P&R received a request from residents to consider picnic area improvements rather than replacing the playground at this location.

TBD

89 CC 04-02-2025
89 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 16 of 40
Memorial Park
The City recently completed the Memorial Park Master Plan, which provides an extensive list of improvements to revitalize and update the park. The plan was assembled by collecting and incorporating public input through an extensive outreach campaign. That process produced a robust road map that will guide the City regarding park improvements for decades. Recently, staff has observed some concern from the public and City Council regarding the cost of the improvements proposed the plan and has heard suggestions regarding reduction of the plan’s scope. Due to the extensive public engagement and input received, it is recommended that the plan remain unchanged, and that projects within the plan be prioritized and scheduled as public sentiment and available funding dictates. At this time, due to fiscal constraints, staff is not proposing any projects for Memorial Park.

Blackberry Farm Golf Course
The irrigation system at Blackberry Farm has long exceeded its useful life cycle. The system is antiquated, is subject to multiple breaks yearly, and is not efficient in its water use for golf course landscaping. An irrigation replacement project is currently proposed for year 4 of the 5- year CIP and is anticipated to cost $1.6M. This project is anticipated to save the City approximately $65,000 annually in maintenance, repairs, and water use, and will improve water efficiency at this property. This project will safeguard against major failures that would be expensive to repair, would result in down time for the golf course operations (including lost revenue), and would help to protect against environmental impacts to Stevens Creek. The project has an approximate return on investment of 24-years, reduces water use, and safeguards both Stevens Creek and players’ ability to utilize the course.

E. Parks CIP - Five-Year Plan

TABLE 8 – 5-YEAR PLAN FOR PARKS CIP PROJECTS
Note: Grey text in Years 2-5 illustrates 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
BBF Golf
Renovation:
minimal repairs
$1,433,250 $1,504,880 $1,580,150 $1,659,158
BBF Golf
Renovation:

Ponds
$1,300,000 $1,365,000 $1,433,250 $1,504,913
Blackberry Farm
Bocce Ball Shade
Structure
$176,400 $185,216 $194,480 $204,204
Creekside Park
Picnic Area Shade
Structure
$176,400 $185,216 $194,480 $204,204
90 CC 04-02-2025
90 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 17 of 40
Linda Vista Park
Picnic Area Shade
Structure
$176,400 $185,216 $194,480 $204,204
Portal Park Picnic
Area Shade
Structure
$176,400 $185,216 $194,480 $204,204
Jollyman Park
Picnic Area Shade
Structure
$176,400 $185,216 $194,480 $204,204
subtotals $0 $0 $0 $1,580,150 $0

FY25-26: Jollyman AIPG will be completed in 2025, and the Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail project could be completed in 2027. We continue to work on replacing playgrounds with safety concerns and dispersing improved park amenities to locations with the greatest need. Work on the design, procurement, and installation of new equipment at playgrounds could resume in the Fall of 2025.

FY26-27 and FY27-28: Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail project work will continue, and work on the Playgrounds replacements can resume. Park Amenities upgrades will continue.

FY28-29: Initiating the improvements to the irrigation system at the Blackberry Farm golf course is also a priority to improve efficient use of our water resources. Staffing prevents initiation of this project in years 1-3, but in year 4 this will be a recommended priority project.

FY29-30: Blackberry Farm golf course irrigation system improvements will continue into this fiscal year.

Providing Shade Structures at various park locations was a Council-stated priority in years past, and improving shade opportunities is a priority of the PRSMP. Current CIP staff can not initiate these projects in FY25-26, but the City will continue to pursue grant funding for these amenities. 91 CC 04-02-2025
91 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 18 of 40

CIP: STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
City of Cupertino
92 CC 04-02-2025
92 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 19 of 40

3. Streets and Infrastructure

A. Existing Streets and Infrastructure CIP Projects: There are five active and funded CIP projects that are considered Streets and Infrastructure projects, and one other funded project that is in the queue.

TABLE 9 - ACTIVE STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE CIP PROJECTS # Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project
Total
Remaining
Funds*
ST1 Stevens Creek
Bridge Repair
Stevens Creek Blvd Bridge over
Stevens Creek. Prepare
feasibility study and PS&E to
determine and implement
appropriate scour
countermeasures. (Externally
Funded, in part)
FY23-24 $172,000 $860,000 $172,000
FHWA highway Bridge Program
grant
FY23-24 $688,000
ST2 McClellan Road
Bridge
Reconstruction
Reconstruction of the bridge on
McClellan Road near the
entrance to McClellan Ranch
Preserve. (Externally Funded -CA
DOT)
FY23-24
(State
Funding)
$5,000,000 $5,850,000 $5,850,000
CPF FY24-25 $850,000
ST3 City Lighting LED
improvements
Implement the transition of
City's streetlight infrastructure
from induction and other fixtures
to LED fixtures to meet the "Dark
Sky" Ordinance requirements
and reduce light pollution and
energy cost.

EECBG grant funding ($139,000)
awarded in FY24-25, but will not
be included as revenue until the
award is re-affirmed in the
current federal administration.

FY21-22 $50,000 $1,350,000 $501,074
City Funding FY22-23 $1,300,000
ST4 City Bridge
Maintenance
Repairs Project
(Bridge
Preventive
Maintenance
Program, or
BPMP)
Design and implement the repair
of five City bridges as
recommended in the Caltrans
Bridge Report along with
additional improvements to
prolong the useful life of the
bridges.

FY15-16 $165,000 $2,176,105 $174,347
City Funding FY16-17 $535,000
FHWA FY16-17 $571,151
93 CC 04-02-2025
93 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 20 of 40
FHWA FY22-23 $716,296
FHWA FY23-24 $95,227
FHWA FY24-25 $510,521
City Funding FY24-25 $300,000
City Funding FY24-25 $1,176,105
ST5 Street Light
Installation -
Annual Infill
Infill of gaps in streetlight
network as requested by
residents. (Annually funded)
FY17-18 $430,000 $430,000 $142,241
ST6Q Vai Avenue
Outfall
Investigate, design, and replace
existing failing 36” corrugated
metal pipe (CMP) storm drain
line with new reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP) or high-
density polyethylene (HDPE)
pipe.

FY24-25 $490,000 $490,000 $438,756

subtotal $13,049,300 $13,049,300 $7,278,418
*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

• The BPMP project will be completed in the summer of 2025. • The engineering contract for the Stevens Creek Bridge project has been awarded, and the investigation into potential options will commence.
• The City will hire an engineering firm to assess the current conditions, provide design alternatives, and develop the necessary documentation and cost estimates. Once the documentation is prepared, the project will be considered "shovel-ready," increasing its chances of securing additional grant funding to complete the project. • Procurement for the City Lighting LED Improvements project is in progress, and installations will begin once the fixtures are delivered (Anticipated completion is September 2025).

Vai Avenue Outfall project is noted as completed and as an active project, due to the successful temporary repair of the outfall pipe section this fiscal year. However, the replacement of the outfall pipe section is not yet completed. Staff will coordinate permanent repairs through Valley Water as part of their CIP project to stabilize Regnart Creek in this reach. This will create efficiencies in permitting and ensure a repair that is compatible with Valley Water’s efforts.

B. FY25-26 Proposed Streets and Infrastructure CIP Projects The CIP FY25-26 proposal for new Streets and Infrastructure projects includes one project to repair three grade 5 (most significantly damaged) Storm Drain Outfalls identified in the 2024 report on the condition of the City’s storm drain outfalls.

94 CC 04-02-2025
94 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 21 of 40
TABLE 10 – FY25-26 PROPOSED STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE CIP PROJECTS # Project name Project Description FY25-26
Funding
New Outfalls Repairs Following the recommendations of the 2024 Outfalls Report
$950,000

2024 Outfall Report – Repair projects
The purpose of the 2024 Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment report was to inventory the storm drain assets and to determine necessary improvements and maintenance activities for the outfall pipes and structures. The City maintains 175 outfall pipe segments, totaling approximately 17,051 feet, within the storm drain network. The outfall pipes discharge urban rainfall runoff from the City’s storm drain system into various creeks/channels managed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water). The report documented observations of the condition of outfall pipes, along with their corresponding outfall structure, and nearest upstream structure. The primary assessment method for the pipeline segments and outfall structures consisted of closed circuit television (CCTV), visual examinations and documentation through photographs.

The report assessed 205 pipe segments across 175 sites. 31% show structural defects with significant defect grades (NASCO grades 4 and 5). 19% have significant defects that affect operations and maintenance. Most of the defective pipes were CMP outfall pipes that were installed consistent with Valley Water specifications for outfall pipes which were in place at the time of installation. Grade 3, 4, and 5 defects were common in pipelines that were constructed from corrugated metal pipe (CMP). This is due to the susceptibility of CMP to corrosion, which leads to holes developing in the pipes. Though not as common, several CMP pipelines also showed signs of deformation.

The report also assessed the condition of 117 outfall structures. Most of the structures were in good to moderate condition. Of the 117 outfalls structures three were in level 5 defective condition, and three were in level 4 defective condition. The City will coordinate with Valley Water to plan for the most efficient and cost-effective manner in repairing these outfall structures.

The FY25-26 Outfalls Repair project funding request is for $950,000 to repair outfall pipe segments that have significant defects.

C. Evaluation of Streets and Infrastructure CIP Projects to Defund The BPMP project will be complete in Summer 2025. The Stevens Creek Bridge and McClellan Road Bridge projects are largely funded by external grants, and address health and safety concerns. The LED Streetlight project is in-contract, will reduce our energy usage, and directly addresses dark-sky concerns.

The City does not recommend defunding any of the currently funded projects.

95 CC 04-02-2025
95 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 22 of 40
D. Unfunded Streets and Infrastructure CIP Projects
In the past five years, several projects have been proposed and remain unfunded. The list that follows notes the years proposed and projected cost in FY25-26 dollars.

TABLE 11 – UNFUNDED STREETS & INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Project FY
proposed
Project Description Projected
Cost
Fiber Expansion FY23-24 6 projects: Priority projects outlined in the City's Fiber Master Plan.

The City proposes delaying these projects until external funding can be obtained.
$10M
Merriman Road
Storm Drain
FY23-24 Installation of a storm water collection system on Merriman Road to include approximately 800' of storm drain mainline, 3 standard manholes, and 3 new drop inlets/laterals on the eastern side of the roadway. The project may also include surface drainage
improvements such as berms and/or pavement recontouring.

Requested by residents. Not a priority of the SDMP.
$1M
Pumpkin and
Fiesta Storm
Drain Project
(Phase 2)
FY21-22 A priority project of the SDMP. This is Phase 2 of the Pumpkin- Fiesta Storm Drain project. This project is currently on hold while the completed phase one project is evaluated for operational efficiency.
$750,000
Regnart Road
Improvements,
(Phase 2)
FY18-19 Design and Construction of phase 2 of the Regnart Road Improvements project. Proposed improvements include additional drainage structures, slope stabilization and erosion control measures. Priority for safety criteria, improvements needed to stabilize the road and mitigate slide potential.
$2.8M
Storm Drain
Improvements -
Bubb Road,
Phases 1-3
FY19-20 A priority project of the SDMP. TBD

2018 Storm Drain Master Plan projects
The 2018 Storm Drain Master Plan (SDMP) established a prioritized capital improvement program to reduce the risk of flooding within the City of Cupertino. The basic objective of the report was to evaluate the flow capacity of the City’s storm drain network and recommend improvements to enhance storm drain capacity at key locations within the City. The first priority of the SDMP was Pumpkin Fiesta, Phases 1 and 2. The City completed Phase 1 improvements in 2023, which should mitigate flooding for an area the had experienced repeated storm drain overflows. Phase 2 is not currently scheduled due to funding resources.

Further, the Phase 1 improvements should help to mitigate some of the concerns that Phase 2 is intended to address. Staff will continue to monitor the City’s storm drain “hot spots” during rain events and will propose projects as necessary to respond to the City’s needs.

2020 Fiber Master Plan
The City has successfully owned and operated a limited fiber network for more than 10 years— and the network has created real value for the City. Specifically, the City has offset the cost of 96 CC 04-02-2025
96 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 23 of 40
leased circuits in connecting buildings and traffic infrastructure. The network has also provided more capacity, at a higher level of reliability, than would commercial services. Having a dedicated fiber network provides many options for the City to address issues raised in the 2017 Cupertino Communications Risk Report prepared by the Cupertino Office of Emergency Services; concerns about communications resiliency for the City government and the public were also highlighted by the demonstrated vulnerability of commercial communications networks in recent public safety power shutoff (PSPS) events. The fiber network also provides the underpinning of future Smart City infrastructure and services under consideration by the City. The report has a number of recommendations for the fiber-optic network going forward, and one of those is to construct new City-owned and operated fiber to connect City facilities and expand the emergency network capabilities of the system in the process. Following this recommendation six projects were proposed in for FY23-24 but were postponed to allow the City time to seek grant funding to support the projects. Expanding the City’s Fiber network remains a priority and increases the effectiveness of all services that the City provides.

Regnart Road Investigation Report
The Regnart Road Investigation Report identified 6 priority sites that needed immediate attention. Over the last several years, 2 of the sites were fully address with the Regnart Road Improvement Project Phase 1. The City made various minor repairs and improvements along Regnart Road to offset the immediacy to respond to three other priority sites. Priority site 4 will be addressed with an upcoming Storm Drain Outfall project.

E. Streets and Infrastructure CIP - 5-year Plan

TABLE 12 – 5-YEAR PLAN FOR STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE CIP PROJECTS Note: Grey text in Years 2-5 illustrates 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
Outfalls Repairs $950,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000

FY25-26: The City expects to have studied options to determine the scope of work for the repairs of Stevens Creek Bridge, by the end of 2025. The engineering team for the McClellan Road Bridge project is anticipated to be identified and contractually engaged, and completion of the City Lighting LED Improvements project is expected in this fiscal year. If approved, significant progress will be made on the Outfall project.

FY26-27: Engineering work and funding resourcing will continue for the Stevens Creek Boulevard and McClellan Road bridge projects. Work on the first three outfall projects should be complete in this fiscal year, and the City expects to propose additional outfall projects to address priority projects from the outfall assessment report.

97 CC 04-02-2025
97 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 24 of 40
FY27-28: Project initiation of the Pumpkin-Fiesta Storm Drain Phase 2 Project and Regnart Road Improvements Phase 2 Project can be considered for implementation if funding is available and observations of Phase 1 scopes of work inform the proposed development areas. Engineering and environmental analysis will continue for both bridge projects. Additional outfall repair projects are anticipated.

FY28-29: Engineering and environmental analysis will continue for both bridge projects. Project initiation of the Fiber Expansion project may be proposed if external funding can be acquired.

Additional outfall repair projects are anticipated.

FY29-30: Engineering and environmental analysis will continue for both bridge projects.

Additional outfall repair projects are anticipated.

98 CC 04-02-2025
98 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 25 of 40

CIP: TRANSPORTATION
City of Cupertino
99 CC 04-02-2025
99 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 26 of 40

4. Transportation

A. Existing Transportation CIP Projects: There are six active and funded CIP projects that are considered Transportation projects, and three other funded projects that are in the queue.

TABLE 13 - ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION CIP PROJECTS
# Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project
Total
Remaining
Funds*
T1 Stevens Creek
Blvd CL IV
Bikeway Phase 2A
Design and Construction of the
separated bikeway along Stevens
Creek Blvd from Wolfe Road to
DeAnza Blvd. (Externally Funded,
in part)
FY20-21 $350,000 $2,350,000 $277,829
Construction, City Funding FY21-22 $2,000,000
OBAG FY24-25 $807,000
SB1 FY24-25 $693,000
T2 Stevens Creek
Blvd CL IV
Bikeway Phase 2B

Design and Construction of the
separated bikeway along Stevens
Creek Blvd from De Anza Blvd to
US-85. This includes signal
upgrades at Bandley Drive. The
design funding was in
conjunction with Phase 2A.
(Externally Funded, in part)
FY20-21 $0 $0 $0
T3 Bandley
Intersection
Signal upgrades at Bandley
Drive. Scope of work will be
included in SCB Phase 2B for
efficiency. (Externally Funded, in
part)
FY18-19 $150,090 $142,210
In-Lieu funds FY18-19 $25,658
City funding FY18-19 $124,432
T4 Bollinger Road
Corridor Study
Traffic analysis, topographic and
utilities survey, and preliminary
engineering of Bollinger Road.
(Externally Funded, in part)
FY24-25 $106,400 $532,000 $532,000
Safe Streets 4 All (SS4A) grant FY24-25 $425,600
T5 Roadway Safety
Improvements -
HSIP
High Friction pavement
treatment and speed feedback
signage added to seventeen
locations. (Externally Funded, in
part)
FY24-25 $356,180 $3,561,800 $3,500,800
HSIP Grant FY24-25 $3,205,620
100
CC 04-02-2025
100 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 27 of 40
T6 Tamien Innu -
East Segment
Design and construct an off-
street bicycle and pedestrian
facility parallel to the I-280 HWY,
from Wolfe Rd. to Vallco Parkway
(Externally Funded & donation
funding)
FY20-21 $600,000 $2,536,000 $1,411,377
VTA Measure B FY21-22 $1,936,000
T7Q Tamien Innu -
Central Segment
Design and construct an off-
street bicycle and pedestrian
facility parallel to the I-280 HWY,
from De Anza Blvd. to Wolfe
Road (Externally Funded –
donation funding)
FY20-21 $600,000 $4,785,000 $4,582,979
VTA Measure B FY20-21 $460,000
VTA Measure B FY20-21 $3,725,000
T8Q Tamien Innu -
West Segment
Design and construct an off-
street bicycle and pedestrian
facility parallel to the I-280 HWY,
from the Don Burnett Bicycle –
Pedestrian Bridge to De Anza
Blvd. (Externally Funded –
donation funding)
FY20-21 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000
T9Q School Walk
Audit
Implementation
Construct infrastructure-related
improvements around schools
that were identified as part of the
comprehensive School Walk
Audit study. (Externally Funded -
Apple)
FY18-19 $250,000 $1,245,852 $939,405
Apple Funding FY19-20 $971,863
City Funds FY20-21 $23,989
subtotal $15,760,742 $15,760,742 $11,986,600

*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

• De Anza Boulevard Buffered Bike Lanes project is complete. City is currently working to collect grant funding but expects reimbursement to take some time. • The Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeway, Phase 2A will begin construction activities in late spring/early summer. The project is currently acquiring materials with long lead times.
• The Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeway, Phase 2B is 95% complete in the design phase. The City will search for external funding options prior to commencing with bidding and construction.
101
CC 04-02-2025
101 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 28 of 40
• The Roadway Safety Improvements project has a design/engineer team working on the design and documentation presently. Once the drawings are complete, the City will advertise the project for bid and construction (anticipated in the fall of 2025). • Bollinger Road Corridor Study is searching for a consultant team to perform the analysis – this will be a multi-year project.
• The preliminary engineering for the Stevens Creek Bridge repair project has begun with the intent of establishing a scope for the repairs needed by the end of 2025. • The design of Tamien Innu East Segment is under review by the adjacent property owner and Valley Water.

School Walk Audit Implementation project
In FY16-17, Cupertino Safe Routes to School (SR2S) worked with each public school in Cupertino to develop a list of infrastructure improvements called the Walk Audit Report. The report details improvements that would make walking and biking safer, and drop-off and pick- up smoother. In FY19-20, SR2S worked with each school to update the list and categorize items into three tiers. Tier 1 and 2 items are almost complete, and the following Tier 3 items are currently being analyzed. Recommended work for these projects is anticipated to begin in the latter part of 2025. Exhibit A-1 has illustrations of the projects listed below.

Lincoln Elementary/ Monta Vista High School
1) Hyannisport Drive at Fort Baker Drive: - Reconstruct intersection to close slip lane onto Fort Baker Drive. Modify the northeast corner of the intersection by removing the right turn slip lane and reduce the corner radius for the right turning traffic to enhance the pedestrian safety.

Sedgwick Elementary
1) Phil Lane Drop-Off: Widen sidewalk on Phil Lane. The sidewalk along Phil Lane will be widened from 5 feet to approx. 12 to 13 feet, and this will involve relocation of curb including one drain inlet. Engineering, surveying, and staking work are required for the removal of four parking spots and modifications to two school driveways.
2) Tantau Ave/Barnhart Ave: Widen sidewalk on Tantau Avenue to match existing paint on street. The sidewalk along Tantau Ave will be widened from 5 feet to approx. 12 to 13 feet. This will require relocation of curb, engineering, surveying, staking work, and modifications/realignments of the high-visibility crosswalk on Barnhart Avenue to increase visibility (after widening sidewalk).

B. FY25 – 26 Proposed Transportation CIP Projects: none.

C. Evaluation of Transportation CIP Projects to Defund
• Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bikeways is the top priority from the Bicycle Transportation plan, and a Tier One priority of the Pedestrian Transportation Plan – improving vehicular, bicyclist and pedestrian safety along one of Cupertino’s busiest arteries was considered a highly important project.
102
CC 04-02-2025
102 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 29 of 40
• The Bollinger Road Corridor Study will evaluate safety concerns along this corridor and is grant funded.
• The Roadway Safety Improvements project is also grant funded with local matching funds. • The Tamien Innu project, specifically the East segment, has been delayed due to design efforts to address physical constraints and Valley Water requirements. If further progress cannot be made, this project could be defunded. However, it is funded by developer and donation funds and grants.

Staff does not recommend defunding the transportation projects listed above.

D. Unfunded Transportation CIP Projects
In the past five years, several projects have been proposed and remain unfunded. The list that follows notes the years proposed and projected cost in FY25-26 dollars.

TABLE 14 - UNFUNDED TRANSPORTATION CIP PROJECTS
Project FY
proposed
Project Description Projected
Cost
Bollinger Road
Corridor Design
and Construction
FY23-24 Requested by residents: more follow-up is required before this can become a CIP project.
$4.2M
Carmen Road
Bike/Ped Bridge FY22-23
Requested by the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission and residents, this is a large project, requiring significant staffing and funding resources.
$6M
Stevens Creek
Blvd Separated
Class IV Bikeway,
Phase 3 - Design
& Construction
FY21-22
Hwy85 to Foothill Blvd., continuing from Ph.2 to the west. Phase 3 will involve installing precast concrete barriers and traffic signal modifications at the Highway 85 northbound ramp, Bubb Road, and Foothill Blvd intersections to provide protected bicycle signal phasing.
$3.5M

Active Transportation Plan
The Active Transportation Plan (ATP) will guide project prioritization for future bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects. Through an extensive, multiphase community outreach strategy, the ATP will develop capital project recommendations based on public input, safety needs, and mobility goals. While no specific projects are currently defined, the ATP, once adopted in 2026, will help determine which active transportation projects are selected for the CIP. This process ensures that future transportation investments align with community needs and City objectives.

E. Transportation CIP - 5-year Plan

//

//

//

103
CC 04-02-2025
103 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 30 of 40
TABLE 15 – 5-YEAR PLAN FOR TRANSPORTATION CIP PROJECTS
Note: Grey text in Years 2-5 illustrates 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
Bollinger Road
Corridor Study
$4,410,000 $4,630,400 $4,862,000 $5,105,100

FY25-26: Stevens Creek Boulevard (SCB) Phase 2A will be completed in the fall of 2025. Phase 2B, including work at Bandley Intersection, is not currently planned for the 5-year CIP due to funding and staffing resources.

Tamien Innu, East segment design, will be finalized this fiscal year. If design efforts can rectify current physical barriers and achieve Valley Water approval, construction can begin in the Spring of 2026. Once construction is initiated on the East segment, design on the Central segment can resume.

Design for the Roadway Safety Improvements project is anticipated to be completed this fiscal year, with construction initiation anticipated in summer 2026.

FY26-27: Work on SCB Phase 2B may restart if external funding can be acquired. The remaining School Walk Audit Implementation projects are planned to be completed. Tamien Innu and the Roadway Safety Improvements projects are anticipated to continue during this fiscal year. The City expects the Active Transportation Plan to be completed, adopted, and will inform future CIP planning efforts.

FY27-28: Potential transportation projects are anticipated based on information from the approved ATP.

FY28-29: The pre-design/analysis work on the Bollinger Road Corridor will be a two+ year process that is anticipated to be completed in this fiscal year. Funding for the design and construction can be pursued during that time. It is anticipated that the design and construction would be initiated on FY30-31.

FY29-30: Potential transportation projects are anticipated based on information from the approved ATP.

104
CC 04-02-2025
104 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 31 of 40

City of Cupertino
CIP: SUSTAINABILITY
105
CC 04-02-2025
105 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 32 of 40

5. Sustainability

A. Existing Sustainability CIP Projects: There are two active and funded CIP projects that we consider Sustainability projects.

TABLE 16 - ACTIVE SUSTAINABILITY CIP PROJECTS
# Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project Total Remaining
Funds*
SU1 EVCS expansion
- Service Center
The construction of electric
vehicle charging station
(EVCS) infrastructure for
the electrification of the
City’s fleet. Working with
SVCE for technical
assistance.

Estimated Completion:
2026
FY24-25 $560,000 $560,000 $560,000
SU2 Photovoltaics
Systems (PV)
Design &
Installation
This project will design-
build PV systems at three
locations: Quinlan
Community Center,
Cupertino Sports Center,
and Community Hall.

Estimated Completion:
2026
FY24-25 $6,300,000 $6,300,000 $6,296,600
SU3Q Silicon Valley
Hopper EV
parking
Provide electric vehicle
charging stations (EVCS) for
SV Hopper (formerly VIA)
fleet.

Queued due to staffing
resources.

FY22-23 $350,000 $350,000 $321,000

subtotal $7,210,000 $7,210,000 $7,177,600
*Table Note: The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required.

• The PV project contracts were approved in February and the design phase is underway. • CIP is working with SVCE to develop design and bid documents for the Service Center expansion of the EVCS for the City’s fleet vehicles.
• Silicon Valley (SV) Hopper EV parking: Cupertino was part of a successful Dept. of Transportation Charging Facility Infrastructure coalition grant application lead by SVCE and San Jose that would have provided around $500,000 for 7 dual-port level 2 chargers and 1 dual-port level 3 DC Fast Charger behind the Sports Center for public and Hopper use. That award is uncertain now under the current administration. This project is queued due to staffing constraints.
106
CC 04-02-2025
106 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 33 of 40

B. FY25 – 26 Proposed Sustainability CIP Projects: none.

C. Evaluation of Sustainability CIP Projects to Defund
• The EVCS expansion at Service Center project is necessary for the ongoing electrification of the City’s fleet. This project is currently funded and supported through SVCE. • The PV project is in contract and will reduce the City’s utility costs. • The SV Hopper EV parking would address the need for charging of the shuttles’ fleet of electric vehicles.

We do not recommend defunding these projects.

D. Unfunded Sustainability CIP Projects
The Sustainability team outlined a number of projects that may be proposed as CIP projects once scope, costs, and benefits are further developed. The list that follows notes the years proposed and projected cost in FY25-26 dollars.

TABLE 17 - UNFUNDED SUSTAINABILITY CIP PROJECTS
Project FY
proposed
Project Description Projected
Cost
Building Electrification
Analysis
FY25-26 Analysis of top gas-consuming City facilities to examine the current appliance infrastructure, evaluate the
building envelope, and explore available market
alternatives for electrification. This will provide the required details for the cost and timeline of each
facility's upgrade needs. Sustainability team is presently working with BayREN to analyze five facilities as a free service. Other facilities will require an engineering
consultant team to be engaged and can be funded with
CIP Prelim Planning & Design (420-99-047) funds.
~$30,000
Quinlan Community Center
Electrification
FY25-26 Quinlan Community Center has the highest gas
consumption (33.54% of the City’s overall gas usage)
and requires an engineered solution due to roof and
building space constraints, complex building envelope,
and energy efficiency considerations.
~$8M
Library Electrification &
Resiliency upgrades
FY25-26 As the second-highest gas user (22.59% of the City’s overall gas usage), the Library's electrification must be preceded by measures to reduce reliance on reheat
energy. The project will optimize the HVAC system
before replacing the HVAC and hot water boiler with an
electric alternative. Electrification may be best pursued alongside a Resiliency Upgrade to the building, to
facilitate use as the Community's Cooling and Heating
Center. This will probably include a photovoltaic system and battery back-up system. CIP is currently working
with SCCLD to develop a mutually beneficial scope of
work.
~$8M
107
CC 04-02-2025
107 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 34 of 40
Blackberry Farm Pools Water
Heating Upgrades
FY25-26 With high gas usage (approximately 14.27% of the City’s overall gas usage), the Blackberry Farm pool project
presents an opportunity to integrate solar thermal
storage. The plan involves replacing showers with
primary solar thermal and storage and backup small air- source heat pump water heaters. The pool heaters
could be replaced with air-source heat pump
technology in conjunction with solar and storage.

TBD
Electrification of other City
Facilities
FY25-26 Senior Center, Sports Center, BBF Recreation Buildings (medium priorities), Monta Vista Recreation Center,
Service Center, McClellan Ranch Preserve, and other
Park Facilities (lower priorities) can be upgraded to
electric appliances to provide long-term sustainability benefits and reduce operational costs.

TBD
Replace Non-Functional Turf
& Improve water efficiency
FY25-26 Government properties must stop watering non-
functional turf by January 1, 2027, to comply with state mandate AB 1572. It is recommended to start
replacement no later than early 2027 to avoid aesthetic concerns regarding landscaping.

TBD

E. Sustainability CIP – 5-year Plan: the Sustainability projects can be included in the five-year CIP plan when scope of work and project cost estimates are initiated for the projects listed above.

Staff will look for external funding to support potential sustainability projects prior to proposing them.

108
CC 04-02-2025
108 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 35 of 40

CIP: COMPLETED PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
109
CC 04-02-2025
109 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 36 of 40

6. Completed Projects

A. Completed CIP Projects: Four projects were completed in FY24-25, and one additional project is scheduled to be complete before July 2025.

TABLE 18 – COMPLETED CIP PROJECTS
Type Project name Project Description Year
Initiated
Approved
Funding
Project Total Remaining
Funds*
P Blackberry
Farm Pool
Improvements
Make improvements to the
pools and facility related to
safety, accessibility, and
maintenance.

FY21-22 $750,000 $750,000 $31,204
ST Vai Avenue
Outfall –
Repairs**
Investigate, design, and replace
existing failing 36” corrugated
metal pipe (CMP) storm drain
line with new reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP) or high-
density polyethylene (HDPE)
pipe.

FY24-25 $490,000 $490,000 $438,756
T De Anza
Boulevard
Buffered Bike
Lanes
Restripe De Anza Blvd to include
a painted buffered zone
between the existing bike lane
and the vehicle lanes.

FY22-23 $525,000 $696,792 $10,194
City Funding FY23-24 $5,533
TDA3 FY24-25 $166,259
T McClellan Road
Separated Bike
Corridor, Phase
3 Improve pedestrian and bicycle
safety by reconfiguring the
intersection and vehicle
movements. (Externally Funded,
in part)
FY20-21 $164,410 $2,299,410 $99,273
Apple FY19-20 $160,000
VERBS grant FY19-20 $1,000,000
SB1 FY23-24 $975,000
subtotal $4,236,202 $4,236,202 $140,671
*The funds indicated in the “Remaining Funds” column are a calculation based on the transactions to date (3/14/25) and contracts encumbered on each project. It does not fully account for the amount of grant funds that are expensed/received to date. If the project were to be defunded, for example, a more thorough accounting of the funds remaining on the project would be required. **The existing outfall was temporarily repaired. The larger project to replace the outfall has not yet occurred, but the City is coordinating with Valley Water regarding the repair. Project funds will remain active.

One additional project is expected to be completed before the end of the fiscal year: All- Inclusive Play Area & Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility (Jollyman Park).

110
CC 04-02-2025
110 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 37 of 40

CIP: SUMMARY
111
CC 04-02-2025
111 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 38 of 40
Summary
TABLE 19: PROPOSED FY25-26 CIP PROJECTS
Project name Project Description FY25-26
Funding

INTERNAL EXTERNAL
ADA (Americans
with Disabilities
Act)
Improvements
(Annually funded)
This is an ongoing program, funded
annually, to improve accessibility
of public facilities throughout the
City.
$110,000 $110,000 $0
Citywide Facilities
Condition
Assessment
(FCA)
Implementation
Implement priority
recommendations identified in the
Facility Condition Assessment
reports. This is an ongoing initiative
due to the extent of improvements
needed throughout City buildings.
$940,000 $940,000 $0
Outfall Repairs Repair various storm drain outfalls
following the recommendations of
the 2024 Storm Drain Outfalls
Assessment.
$950,000 $950,000 $0
subtotal $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0
Project narratives for each of the newly proposed projects and existing projects can be found in Attachment B.

TABLE 20: PROPOSED FY25-26 CIP FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROJECTS
Note: Grey text in Years 2-5 illustrates 5% escalation costs but are not proposed for implementation in that year and thus are not included in the totals below.

Project FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected
Cost
ADA Improvements
(Annually funded)
$110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000
Citywide Facilities
Condition Assessment
(FCA) Implementation
$940,000 $2,300,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Outfalls Repairs $950,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 BBF Golf Renovation:
minimal repairs
$1,433,250 $1,504,880 $1,580,150 $1,659,158
Totals $2,000,000 $3,015,000* $1,720,000 $3,305,150* $1,730,000 * Current annual CIP funding is $2M/year. Project estimates may be refined prior to requested CIP funding. Proposed annual CIP funding that exceeds $2M/year will require additional funds beyond the $2M annual funding being allocated to the program. Where possible, staff will search for external funding to address funding requests in excess of $2M.

Despite facing challenges such as reduced staffing and scaled-back funding, CIP has continued to deliver projects. Currently, the program is operating with 2.25 full-time employees (FTEs) 112
CC 04-02-2025
112 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 39 of 40
managing a workload that exceeds the capacity of four FTEs. Recruitment efforts are underway to fill two vacant positions. The CIP team is currently focused on maximizing productivity despite resource constraints. Looking ahead, filling these open positions is essential to maintaining a sustainable and effective working environment.

In summary, the proposed FY 25-26 CIP includes ongoing funding for two existing facilities projects and funding for storm drain utility repairs. The projects proposed this year are a result of information from existing facility assessments, which show the need for extensive improvements and repairs to the City’s aging infrastructure. Due to the extensive nature of the work needed, staff envisions some of these projects becoming regular or even annual requests for the foreseeable future. The program has 28 existing projects that are a priority to close out.

This year, the proposal for new projects was driven by the need to implement health and safety- driven projects and was further impacted by limited staffing resources and $2M in funding.

The proposed five-year plan focuses on rehabilitating critical infrastructure that has aged beyond its life cycle. This is a common theme throughout America, and while the City has focused its rehabilitation efforts in recent years on revitalizing its pavement condition, the City must now shift some of this focus onto its buildings and storm drain system to address public health and safety issues.

113
CC 04-02-2025
113 of 321

FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Page 40 of 40

FY25-26 SCHOOL WALK AUDIT (TIER 3) PROJECTS

F
Y25-26 SCHOOL WALK AUDIT (TIER 3) PROJECTS
EXHIBIT A-1
114
CC 04-02-2025
114 of 321
Remove the existing
crosswalks white striping
for all legs.

SCHOOL WALK AUDIT PROJECTS FY25-26

PAGE ONE OF THREE
115
CC 04-02-2025
115 of 321
Phil Ln
Widen sidewalk on Phil Ln
SCHOOL WALK AUDIT PROJECTS FY25-26

PAGE TWO OF THREE
116
CC 04-02-2025
116 of 321
Widen sidewalk on

SCHOOL WALK AUDIT PROJECTS FY25-26

PAGE THREE OF THREE
117
CC 04-02-2025
117 of 321
CIP FY 2024-2025 • 5-year plan ATTACHMENT A

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
F
ISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
and 5-YEAR PLAN

NEW PROJECT NARRATIVES
LEGEND
Health and Safety Improvements
Co
uncil, Commissions and/or Community Priority
High Priorities established through City’s Master Plans or Condition Assessment Reports
Projects that are subsequent phases of existing projects; or projects in the queue that need to be activated
Projects that have secured external funding

CIP FY24-25  5-year plan ATTACHMENT A page 1 Projects that have secured external funding, or which
can result in positive fiscal impacts to the City
CIP FY25-26  5-YEAR PLAN

PROJECT NARRATIVES

ATTACHMENT B
FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 2026

PROJECT NARRATIVES
Attachment B
118
CC 04-02-2025
118 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 2 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

CIP: FACILITIES
City of Cupertino
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
119
CC 04-02-2025
119 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
ADA Improvements
Annually Funded
Proposed FY25-26 City Funding $ 110,000
Total Funding $ 970,000
City Funding FY25-26 $ 110,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 191,990
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Various
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-007, PVAR 002
Initiated: FY15-16
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
An update of the City’s ADA Transition Plan was completed in April 2015. The plan identifies improvements needed and priorities to achieve compliance with ADA in public buildings, parks, and the public right of way.

This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.

There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget.

This is an ongoing initiative funded annually to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.

Accessibility is an ongoing priority for the City.

This initiative began in FY15-16 and has been funded annually for a total of $970,000 as of February 2025. 120
CC 04-02-2025
120 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Facilities Condition Assessment Implementation
Ongoing initiative to address Facilities Deficiencies
Proposed FY25-26 Funding $ 940,000
Total Funding (pre-FY25-26) $ 2,429,890
City Funding (pre-FY25-26) $ 2,006,470
External Funding $ 367,951 (FY24 CDBG)
$ 55,469 (FY25 CDBG)
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 1,536,282
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, GP
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Various
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-078, BAI 001

Project Description

Project Justification

Prioritization

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information

Funding Information

Operating Budget Impacts

Ongoing initiative to implement projects from the prioritized recommendations of the 2017/18 “Comprehensive Facility Condition and Use Assessment” and the “2022 Facility Condition Assessment” (FCA) reports.

The 2017/18 FCA report and the 2022 FCA report assessed the condition of nearly every City owned facility. Several projects were identified as high priority facilities with significant deficiencies that need to be addressed to avoid costly repairs and extended service interruptions. Six projects have been initiated: Senior Center Fire Alarm system (FAS) upgrade, Quinlan Community Center (QCC) AC Chiller replacements, Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms improvements, and the replacement of three flat roofs (Sports Center, QCC, and Senior Center). Other completed FCA projects include Sports Center Fire Control Center panel replacement and the Sports Center Seismic Retrofit. Projects planned for FY25-26 are the upgrades of five FAS at Monte Vista, Creekside Park Rec, Service Center and Sports Center. Library FAS and Sports Center Shower/Locker rooms projects are planned for FY26-27.

As older equipment is replaced with energy efficient equipment and as building systems are upgraded significant, savings are expected in both maintenance and energy costs.

Addressing the high-priority FCA projects is the highest priority, as these projects address health and safety concerns.

This initiative began in FY18-19 and received additional City funding in FY23-24. CDBG grant funds were received for work on the Senior Center property, in FY23-24 and FY24-25. 121
CC 04-02-2025
121 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
City Hall Annex
10455 Torre Avenue Improvements
Total Funding $ 3,000,000
City Funding $ 3,000,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 1,872,539
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, CCMP
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location 10455 Torre Ave.

Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-248, CIV 011
Initiated FY21-22
Project Description
Project Justification
Projected Cost information
Program, plan and build facility improvements to facilitate short-term and long-term use[s] of the building. The scope of work will include programming, planning, design, and construction. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) program and requirements added to the scope of this project in late 2022.

The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous uses, including a satellite and/or interim City Hall facility.

When the EOC scope was added, staff made the decision to delay the request for additional project funding for the EOC until the project was ready to award a contract to a general contractor for construction so that more definitive costs would be discussed. However, when cost estimates on the 65% set of drawings and specifications came in at $6.7M in 2024, the decision was made to pause the project until the City Hall project direction was decided, so that priorities and cost-cutting measures could be evaluated in a fuller context. An updated scope of work, with value- engineering options, and cost estimate would be required to continue work on the project.

With the news of the inflated costs, numerous options were investigated, from scope reductions to a completely reduced program of ‘carpet-and-paint only, and other code required renovations such as accessible entries. The most reduced scope of work was estimated at $2M.

While developing the program for the City Hall Annex building as City’s Permit Center and EOC, staff identified additional cost impacts, including:
• Increase of construction costs due to the addition of the EOC program and infrastructure. The early estimate was that the addition of the EOC would add approximately $500,000 in construction costs. • Increase of soft costs due to the addition of the EOC program. In October 2022, $101,700 was added to the Design professionals’ contract for this reason. Cost estimate for soft costs is approximately $1.5M, leaving $1.5M for construction (which is less than required, see below). • An overall increase in the original construction estimate excluding the addition of an EOC. Staff has learned that the original construction cost estimate for the overall project was too low. 2023 estimates for 2024 construction were estimated at $6.7M without moving/logistics cost, furniture, and other contingencies accounted for.

Operation Budget Impact: Once construction is complete, Facilities and Grounds divisions will need to add this facility to their workload, including maintenance and janitorial. 122
CC 04-02-2025
122 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
City Hall Improvements
Programming, Feasibility, Design, Construction
Total Funding $ 500,000
City Funding $ 500,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 378,036
5-year Funding Total $ 30M to $90M
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, CCMP
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Civic Center
Budget Unit 420-99-250, ST 056
Initiated FY21-22
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Program, plan and build facility improvements at the existing City Hall building site. The scope of work will include programming, planning, design, and construction. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) moves to another facility, but this facility is planned as a “Risk Category IV” Essential Services facility as part of the structural system upgrades.

The existing building does not meet current or projected needs for workplace or meeting spaces; all infrastructure systems (structural HVAC, etc.) are well beyond their useful life and require full replacement.

In the first fiscal year, the design can be initiated. Construction is projected for future fiscal years, depending on the scope and Environmental Review requirements.

Renovations to the existing facility, or a new facility, are expected to improve operational efficiencies and ultimately reduce costs.

Improvements to the existing building, whether in the form of a renovation project or a new City Hall facility, are the highest priority for the health and safety of staff and the community.

Funding required for a renovated or new City Hall is greater than the CIP annual allocations. Alternative funding means are required.
123
CC 04-02-2025
123 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Library Expansion - Landscaping
Final scope of the Library Expansion project
Total Funding $ 9,705,438
City Funding $ 8,705,438
External Funding $ 1,000,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 1,393,310
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR, GF
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Cupertino Library
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-077, CIV 007
Initiated: FY19-20
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Some of the areas in and around the Cupertino Library lack appeal and appropriate facilities for residents who use the library and the Civic Center space. Providing more usable and efficient infrastructure, as well as better landscaping, will improve the positive experience of visiting the library and Civic Center. Landscaping of the building perimeter and courtyard is designed, documented, and ready for a public bid process.

Additional scope under consideration (building electrification, extending electrical junctions to Library field, etc.) will require supplementary engineering and documentation. Staffing needs are deferring this work.

The expanded areas of landscaping may impact the operating budget slightly, but the improved irrigation will have a positive effect as well.

Update existing landscape areas adjacent to the Cupertino Library incorporating appropriate drought resistant plantings, pedestrian amenities including seating and shade structures, and other features to encourage community activation of the Civic Center. Grant funding awarded in 2024 can be applied to installation of a photovoltaic system, battery back-up, extension of an electrical service to Library Field, completing construction of exterior improvements such as the landscaping scope of work, parking and pedestrian improvements, improvements to the drainage and irrigation systems and water conservation efforts.

The grant funding must be expensed by 2030.

The Library Expansion project completed the building scope of work, except the courtyard renovations and exterior landscaping, in 2022. The federal grant facilitated by Ro Khanna’s office was awarded in 2024. The grant must be used for work that has not yet been completed.
124
CC 04-02-2025
124 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 10 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

CIP: PARKS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
125
CC 04-02-2025
125 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
All Inclusive Playground – Jollyman
And Adult-Assistive Bathroom facility
Total Funding $ 4,891,347
City Funding $ 1,230,000 + $ 850,000
External Funding $ 1,448,201 + $ 1,000,000 +
$ 25,000 + $ 338,146
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 262,315
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, Grant, PRSMP, DIL
Project Category Parks, Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Jollyman Park
Origin of Request Public Works, Parks
Budget Unit 420-99-051, PVAR 007
Initiated FY18-19

Project Description

Project Justification

Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information

Funding Information

Operating Budget Impacts

Design and construct an all-inclusive playground at Jollyman Park, and a new adult-assistive bathroom facility adjacent to the All-Inclusive Play Area.

Community input secured during the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan process favors having an All-Inclusive play area in Cupertino. The new "All-Inclusive Playground" (AIPG) project is intended to serve the broad needs of the [inclusive] community The added bathroom facility can serve all ages who require mobility assistance and will vastly improve the usability of the new play area.

Anticipated construction completion date is June 2025.

Anticipated to be a slight impact to the Operating Budget due to the specialized nature of the play equipment and the addition of a bathroom facility. By accepting the grant, the City agreed to construct and maintain the playground for 20 years.

Santa Clara County All-inclusive Playground funding grant was secured in 2019 for $1,448,201. This requires $2,201,799 in matching funds and required fund-raising of $1M. CA Parks and Recreation department awarded a second grant in the amount of $1,000,000 as a Specified Grant program, which met the fund-raising requirement.

PG&E also donated $25,000. Art In-Lieu fees were used to design, procure, and install the “kaleidoscope” art feature, with a budget of $338,146. The Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility scope was funded by Council in FY22-23 ($850K) and added to this project funding.
126
CC 04-02-2025
126 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Plan
De
sign and Construction
Total Funding $ 6,850,909
City Funding $ 6,850,909
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 4,422,565
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, DIL, PRSMP
Project Category Parks
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Near Sterling Barnhart Park
Origin of Request Public Works, Parks
Budget Unit 280-99-009, PLM 001
Initiated FY18-19

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Design and Construct (with programming, public outreach and environmental studies) a neighborhood park located on several acres of land adjacent to Saratoga Creek, near the intersection of Lawrence Expressway and Mitty Way.

The City is under-served for neighborhood parks to meet the level of service goal of the City’s General Plan. The east side of the City is particularly under-served.

Land acquired in September 2020. Design process underway. Due to the extent of environmental permitting required, the project is expected to remain active until the Spring of 2027.

Adding a park to the inventory will have an impact on the operational budget. Public Works can evaluate more fully once the design is complete.

In FY18-19, Apple fees for their project development were applied to the purchase, annexation, and development of this park ($8,270,994). The purchase and annexation costs were approximately $2,330,085. In FY23-24, additional operational funds were secured to reduce the existing berms on site. The berms reduction can occur once the design is more established.

The design process is underway, after a conceptual design process with an enhanced public outreach component.

Adding this park is important for the residents on this side of the city. 127
CC 04-02-2025
127 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Park Amenity Improvements
Multi-year initiative
Total Funding $ 600,000
City Funding $ 200,000 x 3years
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 427,010
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, PRSMP
Project Category Parks
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Various
Origin of Request Parks and Recreation
Budget Unit 420-99-086, PVAR 011
Initiated FY 20-21
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Funding for various park amenities such as benches, hydration stations, outdoor table tennis, cornhole, shade (structures and/or trees), dog-off-leash, pickleball striping, etc.

Residents requested upgrades to the Park amenities, and this program provides the funding and staffing for the procurement and implementation.

The existing Park sites’ Amenities were evaluated by staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission, and a prioritization schedule developed. Installations are underway.

There are no anticipated additional impacts to the Operating Budget.

This is a departmental low priority, however it has been a valuable resource to address community concerns in our parks.

This initiative began in FY20-21 and was funded for three years. 128
CC 04-02-2025
128 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
McClellan Ranch - West Parking Lot Improvement
Mitigation Measure Monitoring & Reporting
Total Funding $ 1,069,682
City Funding $ 1,069,682
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 1,611
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR
Project Category Parks
Project Type Design and Construction
Location McClellan Ranch Preserve
Origin of Request Parks and Recreation
Budget Unit 420-99-030, MRW 002
Initiated: FY16-17
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
The riparian mitigation site between the parking lot and Stevens Creek was planted in 2018 and replanted in 2023.

Performance Monitoring and reporting is required for five years, starting in 2023.

The McClellan Ranch West site was used informally for staff and overflow parking without a suitable, stable surface, and which is not available for use during wet weather due to mud. The opening of the Environmental Education Center in 2015 increased the parking demand at McClellan Ranch Preserve. The removal of the Simms house on the site allowed for the installation of the additional needed parking with a suitable parking surface.

The mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting will continue until 2027.

Establishment of the native planting requires monitoring and irrigation that will decrease once the plantings mature.

After 2027, the operational impact will decrease.

This mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting is required to continue to meet the requirements of the Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA; Notification No. 1600-2018-0207-R3) issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on December 14, 2018.This project received City funding in FY16-17, FY17-18 and FY18-19. The monies that remain fund the mitigation measure performance monitoring and reporting required by the LSAA permit. 129
CC 04-02-2025
129 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 17 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

CIP: STREETS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
City of Cupertino
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
130
CC 04-02-2025
130 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Stevens Creek Bridge Repair
Improve structural foundations
Total Funding $ 860,000
City Funding $ 98,642
External Funding $ 761,358
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 860,000
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF/Grants, GP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Stevens Creek Blvd over Stevens Creek
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-267, ST 063
Initiated FY23-24
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Repairs to the bridge supports to include countermeasures to scouring (undermining) of the support bases.

The design of the existing bridge utilizes mat foundations for the bridge supports that have started to become undermined. This project will perform modifications to create a firm structural footing for the supports. The condition of the support foundations has been noted in recent biennial bridge inspection reports and the repairs are recommended by Caltrans. The repair work is funded by the FHWA Highway Bridge Program for 88.53% of the design and construction costs.

Engineering consultants have initialized the preliminary design phase of the project. Once the scope of work required is more defined, a projected schedule will be developed.

Construction of the project will not increase operating budget expenses.

Improving the safety of our City bridges is a leading priority. Grant funding has been secured which enables the project team to proceed with preliminary engineering. The engineering firm is in contract with the City. This will provide insight into final scope and costs.

FHWA funding was awarded for this project. Funding for the design phase is currently programmed in the FTIP for the 2023/24 FFY and construction funding is programmed for ‘beyond 2025/26.’ Staff will continue to work with Caltrans to identify opportunities to make construction funds available sooner to minimize time from end of design to the start of construction.
131
CC 04-02-2025
131 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction

Projected Costs $ 8,000,000
City Funding $ 0
External Funding $ 5,850,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 5,850,000
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, GP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location McClellan Road 300’ east
of Club House Lane
Priority Medium
Origin of Request Public Works
Initiated FY24-25

Project Description

Project Justification

Prioritization

Projected Schedule

Funding Information

Operating Budget Impacts

Reconstruction of the bridge on McClellan Road near the entrance to McClellan Ranch Preserve.

The existing bridge was constructed in 1920 and is beyond its design life. It does not meet current requirements for pedestrian access and lacks the width to facilitate bicycle lanes. A reconstructed bridge will enhance pedestrian facilities.

Design and Construction will be a multi-year endeavor, requiring environmental permits and Caltrans approvals for both design and construction procurement.
$5.85M in grant funding has been secured. Approximately $2.2M in funding is still required. Priority for Safety criteria, following recommendations from inspection reports issued by Caltrans. CIP is starting preliminary design in FY 24-25 to support efforts to obtain additional grant funding.

Design and construction will require approximately $8M in funding. Staff proposes to utilize the existing grant funding to initiate preliminary engineering design which will provide further opportunities to apply for grants to complete the project funding.

Construction of the project will not increase operating budget expenses.

132
CC 04-02-2025
132 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
City Lighting LED Improvements
Updates to meet Dark Sky requirements
Total Funding $ 1,350,000
City Funding $ 1,350,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 501,074
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, GP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Feasibility
Location Various
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-258, ST 052
Initiated FY21-22
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule
Operating Budget Impacts
Develop a strategy to transition the City’s streetlight infrastructure, and other City operated lights, from induction to LED fixtures to meet the “Dark Sky” requirements and reduce light pollution. Assess the costs, benefits, and opportunities of the proposed improvements.

In March 2021 the City ratified the "Dark Sky" night lighting requirements for private development. As City street lighting and other facility lighting may create unintended light pollution, and in some cases is nearing the end of its useful life, this study will evaluate lighting needs and compliance with dark sky requirements for the City’s nearly 3000 streetlights, various path lighting and exterior facility lighting.

Procurement is underway. The construction schedule is listed to be completed by December 2025.

There are no anticipated additional impacts to the Operating Budget by this work.

This project brings the City streetlights into compliance with the Dary Sky codes and reduces energy costs. It is a highly prioritized project for these reasons and because it is nearing completion. 133
CC 04-02-2025
133 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
City Bridge Maintenance Repairs
Repairs from Caltrans report
Total Funding $ 2,176,105
City Funding $ 282,910
External Funding $ 1,893,195
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 174,347
Funding Source, Approved Plan TF, GP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Homestead/ McClellan @ Stevens
Ck., Stevens Creek/ Vallco/ Miller/
Tantau @ Calabazas Ck.

Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 270-90-960, ST 002
Initiated FY15-16

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Design and construct 6 bridges’ repairs as recommended in the Caltrans Bridge Report along with additional improvements to prolong the useful life of the bridges.

The City of Cupertino owns and maintains a total of eight vehicular bridges. Caltrans inspects these bridges and prepares a biennial report detailing the recommended repairs. Six of the eight bridges require rehabilitation; SCB over Stevens Creek has issues not covered by maintenance. The rehabilitation includes the required repairs as recommended in the Caltrans Bridge Report as well as additional work to prolong the life and use of the bridges.

Approximately 88% of the project costs are eligible for Federal reimbursement through FHWA’s Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP), which is administered by Caltrans.

Construction is anticipated to be complete in April 2025.

There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant funding begun as $571,151 and was increased since FY15-16 to be a total of $1,893,195. This grant will be a reimbursement and requires $245,284 in matching funds. 134
CC 04-02-2025
134 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Streetlight Installation – Annual Infill
Annually funded
Proposed FY25-26 Funding $ 0
Total Funding $ 430,000
City Funding FY25-26 $ 0
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 139,741
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, GP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Various
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-056, ST 024
Initiated FY17-18
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Design and install streetlights on an as needed basis, to infill lights and poles when requested by residents.

There are areas of the city where streetlight spacing is insufficient to meet current standards for illumination. Several locations are identified annually for infill with one or two lights. This annual appropriation allows these deficiencies to be readily addressed.Ongoing program.

This program uses staff time for the installation of these lights. Additional annual energy costs will be extremely minor.

Providing these services and fixtures for resident safety and welfare is important.

This initiative began in FY17-18 and has been funded annually for a total of $430,000 as of February 2025. Most years had allocations of $75,000 per year. This amount was reduced in recent years to be $35,000. No request for additional funds in FY25-26. This may move to become Streets division “Special Project” in FY26-27. 135
CC 04-02-2025
135 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Vai Avenue Outfall
Total Funding $ 490,000
City Funding $ 490,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 438,756
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR/SD, GP/SDMP
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Vai Ave outfall near
Regnart Creek
Origin of Request Public Works
Initiated FY24-25
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Investigate, design, and replace existing failing 36” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) storm drain line with new reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe.

In December 2023, the City was made aware of damage to this storm drain outfall. The City operates and maintains the storm drain facilities throughout Cupertino. The storm drain pipe in question has corroded, undermined the creek bank, and needs to be replaced before further erosion and property damage occurs.

The outfall was patched with a new section of CMP as a quick fix in October 2024. The repair should last one or two rainy seasons, then we can pursue full replacement of the CMP that has eroded. Site access is difficult and will require environmental permitting.

No ongoing operational impacts are expected.

Replacement of the pipe is necessary to ensure proper operation to protect public and private property and safety.

The initial repair used approximately $25,000. The proposed budget will enable design, construction, and environmental permitting of the CMP replacement. Storm Drain funds (210) will be used if available. 136
CC 04-02-2025
136 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Storm Drain Outfalls Repairs
Priority projects from 2024 Outfalls report
Proposed FY25-26 Funding $ 950,000
City Funding $ 950,000
External Funding $ 0
5-year Funding Total $ TBD
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF
Project Category Streets and Infrastructure
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Near 10516 Whitney Way
Origin of Request Public Works
Proposed: FY25-26
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
The 2024 Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment report assessed 205 pipe segments across 175 sites. Of the 117 outfalls three were in level 5 defective condition, and three were in level 4 defective condition. The FY25-26 funding requested will address the three outfalls that have the most severe damage and present as imminent failures. In following years, additional funding will be requested to address deficiencies noted in the report.

The three locations for FY25-26 are: #SWPP398 is an 48-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Whitney Way and Pacific Drive, #SWPP1546 is an 15-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Richwood Court and Miller Avenue, and #SWPP3360 is an 30-inch diameter corrugated metal pipeline (CMP) near the vicinity of Finch Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard. All three show sign of corrosion and need to be rehabilitated.

The Storm Drain Outfall Condition Assessment Project completed in 2024 identified multiple structural defects of existing storm drain pipelines that need to be rehabilitated. These defects pose a significant risk to the integrity of the storm drain system. Addressing the issues through timely rehabilitation is crucial to maintain the functionality of the system.It is estimated that the construction of these three outfall repairs can be completed within a year.

There are no operating budget impacts to completing this project.

This project will mitigate the defects to prevent further deterioration of the pipeline. The project is of high importance to address the risk of pipeline failure.

Funding source for this project will be from either General Fund or Stormwater Fund. No grant funds are available. 137
CC 04-02-2025
137 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 24 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

CIP: TRANSPORTATION
City of Cupertino
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
138
CC 04-02-2025
138 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Bikeway – Phase 2A
Separated Bikeway & Signal Upgrades
Total City Funding $ 2,350,000
City Funding $ 2,350,000
External Funding $ 807,000 (OBAG)
External Funding $ 693,000 (SB1)
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 277,829
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF/GF, BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location SCB: Wolfe to De Anza
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 053 and ST 059
Initiated FY20-21
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Phase 2A includes design and construction of the separated bikeway along Stevens Creek Blvd (SCB) from Wolfe Road to De Anza Blvd. Improvements include traffic signal modifications at Wolfe Road and De Anza Blvd to provide separate bicycle phasing.

The 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan identifies improvements needed and priorities to enhance and promote safer bicycle transportation in the City. The number one priority of the Plan was to provide a separated Class IV bicycle lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. This project is the second phase to address that priority.

Design and Documentation, and community outreach for Phase 2A (Wolfe Road to De Anza Blvd.) is complete. The construction contract for Phase 2A was awarded in February 2025. Construction will be complete before the end of the calendar year. See Phase 2B project narrative for more information on the subsequent work on this project.It is anticipated that separated bike lanes will require additional maintenance to sweep bike lanes clean of debris. This cost will be in addition to normal street sweeping operations and will be included in the Operating budget.

Improving vehicular, pedestrian and bicyclist safety is a primary concern. The Bike Transportation plan named this the first priority, and the Pedestrian Transportation assigned this Tier 1 priority.

External grant funding has been secured for this project (OBAG and SB1 funding) and this will be used to reduce the City’s costs on Phase 2A. The remainder of the funds allocated by the City for Phase 2 will be used on Phase 2B. 139
CC 04-02-2025
139 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Bikeway – Phase 2B
Separated Bikeway & Signal Upgrades
Total City Funding* $ TBD
City Funding* $ 0
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) N.A.

Funding Source, Approved Plan GF/GF, BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location SCB: De Anza to Highway 85
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 053 and ST 059
Initiated FY20-21
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Phase 2B includes design and construction of the separated bikeway along Stevens Creek Blvd (SCB) from De Anza Blvd. to Highway 85. Upgrades to the traffic signal at Bandley Dr. and Stevens Creek Blvd. will include new conduit, wiring, traffic signal boxes, two new signal heads, and a split phase signal operation for vehicles entering onto Stevens Creek Blvd. *Note: SCB Phase 2A and 2B were jointly funded in design. SCB Bikeway Phase 2B and Bandley Drive Signal Upgrade projects are combined in design and construction to increase efficiency, however funding is noted separately because the Bandley intersection project is funded with DIL fees.

The 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan identifies improvements needed and priorities to enhance and promote safer bicycle transportation in the City. The number one priority of the Plan was to provide a separated Class IV bicycle lane on Stevens Creek Blvd. This project is the second phase to address that priority.

It is anticipated that separated bike lanes will require additional maintenance to sweep bike lanes clean of debris. This cost will be in addition to normal street sweeping operations and will be included in the Operating budget.

Design and Documentation of Phase 2B and the Bandley project is 95% complete. The project will be permitted, bid, and constructed once Phase 2A is complete.

Improving vehicular, pedestrian and bicyclist safety is a primary concern. The Bike Transportation plan named this the first priority, and the Pedestrian Transportation assigned this Tier 1 priority. *External grant funding has been secured for Phase 2A of this project and this will be used to reduce the City’s costs on Phase 2A. The remainder of the funds allocated by the City for Phase 2 will then be used on Phase 2B. External funding may be available for Phase 2B.
140
CC 04-02-2025
140 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Bandley Drive Signal Upgrades
Traffic & Signal Upgrades
Total Funding $ 150,090
City Funding $ 124,432
External Funding $ 25,658 (DIL)
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 142,210
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF & DIL/GF, BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location SCB & Bandley Intersection
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-070, ST044
Initiated FY18-19
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Upgrades to the traffic signal at Bandley Dr. and Stevens Creek Blvd. will include new conduit, wiring, traffic signal boxes, two new signal heads, and a split phase signal operation for vehicles entering onto Stevens Creek Blvd. Note:

SCB Bikeway Phase 2B and Bandley Drive Signal Upgrade projects are combined in design and construction to increase efficiency. Funding is noted separately because the Bandley intersection project is funded with DIL fees.

The Bandley Drive Signal Upgrades will significantly enhance pedestrian safety and pedestrian connectivity across Stevens Creek Blvd within the Crossroads district by reducing pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. Vehicle safety will also be increased for vehicles exiting the Crossroads driveway and Bandley Drive.

The signal upgrades will not increase operational costs.

Design and Documentation of Phase 2B and the Bandley project is 95% complete. The project will be permitted, bid, and constructed once Phase 2A is complete.

Improving vehicular, pedestrian and bicyclist safety is a primary concern. This project will significantly enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety.

External grant funding has been secured for Phase 2A. Additional external funding may be available for Phase 2B. The remainder of the City funds allocated for Phase 2 will be applied to Phase 2B once Phase 2A is complete. The scope of work for the Bandley intersection will be included in the Phase 2B scope of work for efficiency. 141
CC 04-02-2025
141 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Bollinger Road Corridor Study
T
raffic Analysis, Feasibility and Preliminary Design
Total Funding $ 532,000
City Funding $ 106,400
External Funding $ 425,600
5-year Funding Total $ 4,000,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 532,000
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, BTP & BCSS
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Bollinger Road, De Anza Blvd to
Lawrence Exp.

Origin of Request Public Works, BPC
Budget Unit 270-99-270, ST 067
Initiated FY24-25
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
In December 2020, City staff initiated a safety and operational study of the Bollinger Road from De Anza Boulevard to Lawrence Expressway to identify improvements that will enhance pedestrian, bicycle, motor-vehicle, and transit operations as a safety corridor. This is a collaboration between the City of Cupertino and City of San JosØ.

Further design and analysis work is required. This includes a topographic and utilities survey of Bollinger Road, preliminary engineering, and traffic analysis. The traffic analysis will determine the potential for the road diet (Alternative A from 2020 Feasibility Study) to increase congestion or divert traffic onto residential streets, and any corresponding mitigation measures to limit that impact (Alternative B from 2020 Feasibility Study).

Year 1 work includes preliminary design, feasibility, public outreach, traffic analysis, and topographic surveying. Year 2 will see continuation of Year One activities and initial preliminary engineering. Year 3 will encompass final preliminary engineering and preparation of final plans, specifications, and estimates.

T.B.D.

External grant funding obtained; 20% matching funds required. Improves safety and sustainable means of transportation and builds upon master plan priorities. Initial Traffic Study and preliminary designs can be initiated in this FY by PW.

Funding for analyses, public outreach, and preliminary plans, and estimates. Construction of improvements will require additional funding.
142
CC 04-02-2025
142 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Roadway Safety Improvements
High Friction Pavement & Speed Feedback Signage
Total Funding $ 3,561,800
City Funding $ 356,180
External Funding $ 3,205,620
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 3,500,800
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR/grant, GP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Various
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 270-99-271, ST 068
Initiated FY24-25
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
High Friction pavement treatment and speed feedback signage added to seventeen locations within the City. Roadway segments include sections of: De Anza Blvd, Homestead Rd, Bollinger Rd, Wolfe Rd, McClellan Rd, Bubb Rd, Mariani Ave, Tantau Ave, Mary Ave, Blaney Ave, Rainbow Dr, Miller Ave, Stelling Rd, Valley Green Dr, and Calvert Dr.

Improves safety on roadway segments by reducing unsafe speed violations and rear end collision by implementing dynamic/variable speed warning signs at the curves along the corridor and improving pavement friction. This scope of work supports the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), which identifies transportation safety improvement needs for all ages, abilities, and modes of transportation for the purpose of reducing fatal and severe injury collisions. In July 2023, City Council accepted state funding from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant for safety improvements on 17 roadway segments in the City of Cupertino.The project is currently in design. The construction is scheduled to be completed in winter 2025/2026.

Construction of the project will not significantly increase operating budget expenses. $3.2M in grant funding has been secured, 10% matching funding required by the City. Priority for Safety criteria.

Funding will be applied to design and construction.
143
CC 04-02-2025
143 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Tamien Innu, East Segment
East Segment of the Trail
Total Funding $ 2,536,000
City Funding $ 0
Dev Funding $ 600,000
External Funding $ 1,936,000 (VTA Meas B + TDA3)
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 1,829,816
Funding Source, Approved Plan AP/Grant, BTP, PTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Wolfe Road to Calabazas Creek
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 046
Initiated FY20-21

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Design of an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel from De Anza Blvd. Wolfe Road (Central), and from Wolfe Rd. to Vallco Parkway (East).

Highly prioritized in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, the Tamien Innu is one of the trail segments that would make up “The Loop” to provide an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility that runs parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel and Calabazas Creek and would provide a connection between the Don Burnett Bicycle – Pedestrian Bridge and Vallco Parkway when all the sections are completed.

Schematic design for both the Central and East segments have been submitted for environmental review. Construction and permitting documentation for the East segment are underway. The Central segment design and construction will progress once the first segment enters construction, and the environmental report is reviewed.

It is anticipated that trail will require additional maintenance. However, it is anticipated that these impacts will be minimal.

Facilitating alternative means of transportation is a valuable resource for the City and its businesses.

Developer funding was contracted in FY18-19, and Council added the project to the CIP in FY20-21. VTA Measure B and TDA3 funding has been awarded.
144
CC 04-02-2025
144 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Tamien Innu, Central Segment
Central Segment of the Trail
Total Funding $ 4,785,000
City Funding $ 0
Dev Funding $ 600,000
External Funding $ 460,000 (VTA Meas B)
External Funding $ 3,725,000 (VTA Meas B)
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 4,582,979
Funding Source, Approved Plan AP/Grant, BTP, PTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location De Anza Blvd. to Wolfe Road
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 050
Initiated FY20-21
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Highly prioritized in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, the Tamien Innu Trail is one of the trail segments that would make up “The Loop” to provide an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility that runs parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel and Calabazas Creek and would provide a connection between the Don Burnett Bicycle – Pedestrian Bridge and Vallco Parkway when all the sections are completed.

It is anticipated that trail will require additional maintenance. However, it is anticipated that these impacts will be minimal.

Design of an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel from De Anza Blvd. Wolfe Road (Central), and from Wolfe Rd. to Vallco Parkway (East).

Schematic design for both the Central and East segments have been submitted for environmental review. Construction and permitting documentation for the East segment are underway. The Central segment design and construction will progress once the first segment enters construction, and the environmental report is reviewed.

Facilitating alternative means of transportation is a valuable resource for the City and its businesses.

Developer funding was contracted in FY18-19, and Council added the project to the CIP in FY20-21. VTA Measure B and TDA3 funding has been awarded.
145
CC 04-02-2025
145 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Tamien Innu, West Segment
West Segment of the Trail
Total Funding $ 600,000
City Funding $ 0
Dev Funding $ 600,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 600,000
Funding Source, Approved Plan AP/Grant, BTP, PTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Don Burnett bridge to De Anza
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 051
Initiated FY20-21
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Highly prioritized in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, the Tamien Innu Trail is one of the trail segments that would make up “The Loop” to provide an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility that runs parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel and Calabazas Creek and would provide a connection between the Don Burnett Bicycle – Pedestrian Bridge and Vallco Parkway when all the sections are completed.

It is anticipated that trail will require additional maintenance. However, it is anticipated that these impacts will be minimal.

Design of an off-street bicycle and pedestrian facility parallel to the existing Junipero Serra Channel from De Anza Blvd. Wolfe Road (Central), and from Wolfe Rd. to Vallco Parkway (East).

Schematic design for both the Central and East segments have been submitted for environmental review. Construction and permitting documentation for the East segment are underway. The Central segment design and construction will progress once the first segment enters construction, and the environmental report is reviewed. The design and construction of the west segment will follow the central segment.

Facilitating alternative means of transportation is a valuable resource for the City and its businesses.

Developer funding was contracted in FY18-19, and Council added the project to the CIP in FY20-21. 146
CC 04-02-2025
146 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
School Walk Audit Implementation
Tier 3 Improvements
Total Funding $ 1,245,852
City Funding $ 23,989
External Funding $ 1,221,863
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 939,405
Funding Source, Approved Plan AP/GF, GP & PTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Citywide, in the vicinity of
14 public schools
Origin of Request Public Works
Budget Unit 420-99-069, ST 034
Initiated FY18-19
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
This project will construct infrastructure-related improvements around schools that were identified as part of the comprehensive School Walk Audit study. Traffic improvements will improve walkability and safety around 14 Cupertino schools: Lincoln ES, Monta Vista HS, Lawson MS, Sedgwick ES, Hyde MS, Garden Gate ES, Homestead HS, Collins ES, Faria ES, Stevens Creek ES, Regnart ES, Cupertino HS, Kennedy MS, Eaton ES.

A walk audit is an assessment of travel behaviors for drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians (both parents and students), developed by observing a school pick up or drop-off period on and around school grounds. Walk audits provide insight into the specific barriers to walking and biking at each school. The assessment team included Alta Planning + Design staff; City of Cupertino staff, nearby residents, and concerned parents. After the audit period completed, audit participants returned to discuss and document their findings on a large-scale school area map. Based on observations and input provided
by school staff, audit participants, and others, the project team developed walk audit reports.

Tier 1 and 2 items are almost complete, and three Tier 3 items are being initiated: Hyannisport Drive at Fort Baker Drive intersection reconstruction, Phil Lane Drop-Off sidewalk widening, and Tantau Ave/Barnhart Ave sidewalk widening. It’s estimated that design and construction of the project will have a 3-year duration.There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget.

The walk audit items identify barriers to walking and biking to school and recommend ways to improve safety and traffic conditions around local schools. Health and safety are the first priority.

In 2019, Apple, Inc. granted funds for the cost of implementing all the walk audit improvements in the City’s ROW. 147
CC 04-02-2025
147 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 30 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

City of Cupertino
CIP: SUSTAINABILITY
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
148
CC 04-02-2025
148 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
EVCS expansion - Service Center
Total Funding $ 560,000
City Funding $ 560,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 560,000
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, GP
Project Category Sustainability, Facilities
Project Type Construction
Location 10555 Mary Avenue
Origin of Request Public Works
Initiated FY24-25
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
The construction of electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) infrastructure at the Service Center is needed for the electrification of the City’s fleet in order to meet the Advanced Clean Fleet (ACF) regulation by California Air Resources Board (CARB). The scope of work follows the Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) report which identified the charging infrastructure needs to meet ACF regulation.

The SVCE systematic assessment of City fleet vehicles had the primary goals of identifying vehicle electrification opportunities, establishing an electrification timeline based on vehicle replacements and the City’s climate action goals and regulatory compliance, and determining the costs and emissions benefits of fleet electrification.

The design will be completed by the SVCE Consultant, Optony, Inc in Spring 2024. The City will need to coordinate with PG&E to obtain new electrical service which could take some time. It is currently anticipated that the project can begin construction in the latter half of 2025.

As EV infrastructure charging units are implemented, staff or contractor resources will be necessary for installation and maintenance of the units. It is difficult to determine the overall operation budget at this time. The maintenance of a Level 2 charger is estimated at $500 per station annually, and $3000 per station annually for Level 3 EVCS.

State regulations require the conversion of City fleet vehicles to electric vehicles, and the EVCS infrastructure is needed to address operations in response to those requirements.

Funding for construction of the infrastructure required for operation of the EVCS. Procurement and installation of units, ongoing operation of the facilities, as well as potential upgrades to electrical service, may require additional funding.
149
CC 04-02-2025
149 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Photovoltaic Systems Design & Installation
Total Funding $ 6,300,000
City Funding $ 6,300,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 6,296,600
Funding Source, Approved Plan CR, CAP
Project Category Sustainability, Facilities
Project Type Design and Construction
Location Community Hall, Sports
Center, Quinlan
Community Center
Origin of Request Public Works
Initiated FY24-25
Project Description
Project Justification
Prioritization
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
In 2023 PG&E announced a rate decrease for electricity generated by photovoltaic (PV) systems (NEM 3) but provided a window to allow grandfathering the more economically-attractive NEM 2.0 rates if interconnection applications were successfully submitted and corresponding systems operational by 2026. NEM 2.0 Interconnection Applications were successfully submitted to PG&E for five Cupertino facilities: Blackberry Farm, Civic Center, Library, Quinlan Community Center & Senior Center, and Sports Center. This project aims to design and build PV systems at three locations. Council reviewed and approved the conceptual designs for Community Hall, Quinlan Community Center and Sports Center in December 2024 before awarding the Design Build contract in February 2025.

The City must connect the proposed photovoltaic systems to the grid by 4/15/2026 in order to take advantage of the NEM 2.0 applications, which provides 75 – 80% greater compensation than NEM 3 rates for electricity that is fed back into the electrical system. The savings in utility costs are projected to be $290K annually, and $13.4M over a 30yr lifespan.Conceptual Design development and cost analysis completed in 2024. Design-Build: March 2025 to April 2026 Installation of the PV systems is projected to save $290K annually in utility costs. While additional maintenance will be required for the PV systems, additional staffing will not be required for ongoing operations and maintenance.

Installation of the PV systems is projected to provide substantial savings on utility costs, going forward. The use of cleaner energy sources is a CAP goal.

The proposed budget will enable design and construction of the systems. Inflation Reduction Act credits projected for this project are approximately $1.4M. Staff will also pursue other grant funding opportunities. 150
CC 04-02-2025
150 of 321
151
CC 04-02-2025
151 of 321
FY25-26 CIP proposal and 5-year Plan Council Meeting 4/02/2025 Page 30 of 34

INSERT SECTION PAGE (GRAPHICS!)

CIP: COMPLETED PROJECTS
City of Cupertino
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
152
CC 04-02-2025
152 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Blackberry Farm Pool Improvements
Replaster the pools, and miscellaneous upgrades
Total Funding $ 750,000
City Funding $ 750,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 31,204
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, PRSMP & ADA
Project Category Facilities, Parks
Project Type Design and Construction
Location BBF Pools Facility
Origin of Request Parks and Recreation
Budget Unit 420-99-073, PVAR 012
Initiated FY21-22

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Operating Budget Impacts
Make improvements to the pools and facility related to safety, accessibility, and maintenance. The scope includes replastering the recreation and the slide pools, redirection of the existing deck drains to existing bioswale, and removing accessibility barriers within the pool house dressing rooms as identified in the 2015 ADA Transition Plan, the 2021 Site Accessibility Report and 2020 building permit application comments.

For multiple years, the two pools at Blackberry Farm have displayed all the signs that are indicative of the need to re- plaster a pool including mineral stains, peeling of the surface, and a rough surface area. The rough surface has been the cause of several injuries, including a worker’s compensation claim. The replastering of pools at Blackberry Farm was last performed in 2009. This maintenance scope, as well as the sanitary and accessibility corrections required by the 2020 permit application process for this scope, are required to continue operations of the aquatic facilities beyond the 2021 aquatic season.

Completed in Summer 2024.

There are no anticipated additional impacts to the Operating Budget. 153
CC 04-02-2025
153 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
DeAnza Blvd Buffered Bike Lanes
Restripe De Anza Blvd for Bike lanes
Total Funding $ 530,533
City Funding $ 364,274
External Funding $ 166,259
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 176,259
Funding Source, Approved Plan GF, BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location De Anza Blvd, entire segment within City
limits (Bollinger Road to Homestead Road).

Budget Unit 420-99-078, CIV 009
Initiated FY22-23

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Restripe De Anza Blvd to include a painted buffered zone between the existing bike lane and the vehicle lanes.

Project is identified as the highest of the Tier 2 priority projects in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan. Project will install a painted buffer area between the existing bike lane and the adjacent vehicle lane. This will require restriping De Anza Blvd to narrow the vehicle lanes to provide room for the painted buffer. Design will be done in-house, funding is for construction only.

Construction was completed in early 2025.

There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget.

TDA3 grant was secured in FY24-25 for $166,259. The project budget was not increased, but the grant funding will be used to reduce the City’s expenses.
154
CC 04-02-2025
154 of 321
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
McClellan Road Separated Bike Corridor
De Anza and Pacifica/McClellan intersection
Total Funding $ 2,299,410
City Funding $ 164,410
External Funding $ 2,135,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2025) $ 99,273
Funding Source, Approved Plan AP/GF/Grant, BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Location De Anza Blvd, McClellan Road,
Pacifica Avenue Intersections
Budget Unit 420-99-036, ST 047
Initiated FY20-21

Project Description
Pro
ject Justification
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan information
Funding Information
Operating Budget Impacts
Improves pedestrian and bicycle safety by realigning the intersection and reconfiguring the vehicle movements.

Improvements include relocating two signal mast arms and poles, related electrical, concrete and striping work, and elimination of the free right turn lanes from eastbound McClellan Road and westbound Pacifica Drive.

Improve traffic flow, efficiency, and bicycle safety at this complex intersection.

The project was completed in the Summer of 2024.

There are no anticipated impacts to the Operating Budget.

Apple funding ($160,000) and a VERBS grant ($1,000,000) were awarded in FY19-20. SB1 funding was applied in FY23- 24 for $975,000.
155
CC 04-02-2025
155 of 321
FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS • 5-YEAR PLAN Funding Types LEGEND Approved Plan(s)
RUC = Restricted Use Category Parks ADA - ADA Transition Plan AP - Apple Funded Donation Streets & Infrastructure BCSS - Bollinger Road Corridor Safety Study BBF - Blackberry Farm Enterprise Fund (560)(RUC) Transportation BCA - Building Condition Assessment DIL - Developer in Lieu Fund (RUC) Facilities CAP - Climate Action Plan DON - Donation New project for FY25-26 CCMP - Civic Center Master Plan GF - General Fund (420/429) (unrestricted) BTP - Bicycle Transportation Plan PD - Park Dedication Fund (280) (RUC) EP - Santa Clara County Expressway Plan RP - Recreation Program Enterprise Fund (580) (RUC) FMP - 2020 Fiber Master Plan SC - Sports Center Enterprise Fund (570) (RUC) GP - General Plan SCCP - Stevens Creek Corridor Park Capital Projects MPP - McClellan Ranch Preserve Master Plan Fund (427) (RUC) PMP - Pedestrian Master Plan
SD - Storm Drain Improvement Fund (210) (RUC) PRSMP - Parks & Recreation System Master Plan TF - Transportation Fund (270) (RUC) PTP - Pedestrian Transportation Plan RRGE - Regnart Road Geotechnical Evaluation
SCC - Stevens Creek Corr. Park Master Plan & Restor.

SDMP - Storm Drain Master Plan
EXISTING & NEW FY25-26 PROJECTS
Description City Funding External Project
Funding
Current Total
Project Budget
Remaining Funds
(3/14/25)
FY 25-26 City
Funding
Funding Type Approved Plan Budget Unit Project No. FY Initiated ADA Improvements (Annually funded)
970,000 0 970,000 191,990 110,000 GF GP/ADA 420-99-007 PVAR 002 FY16 Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA) Implementation 2,006,470 423,420 2,429,890 1,536,282 940,000 GF BCA 420-99-063 BAI 001 FY19 City Hall Annex 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 1,872,539 GF CCMP 420-99-248 CIV 010 FY22 City Hall Improvements 500,000 0 500,000 378,036 GF CCMP 420-99-250 CIV 011 FY22 Library Expansion Project: landscaping & courtyard 8,705,438 1,000,000 9,705,438 1,391,910 GF CCMP 420-99-077 CIV 007 FY20 All Inclusive Play Area & Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility (Jollyman Park)
2,418,146 2,473,201 4,891,347 4,255,313 GF PRSMP 420-99-051 PVAR 007 FY19 Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail Plan 6,850,909 0 6,850,909 4,422,565 DIL GP, PRSMP 280-99-009 P LM 001 FY19 Park Amenity Improvements 600,000 0 600,000 417,460 GF PRSMP 420-99-086 PVAR 011 FY21 MRP West Parking Lot Improvements (Habitat monitoring) 1,069,682 0 1,069,682 1,611 420-99-030 MRW 002 FY17 Annual Playground Replacement 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 913,755 GF PRSMP 420-99-085 PVAR 010 FY21 Stevens Creek Bridge Repair 172,000 688,000 860,000 172,000 TF GP 420-99-267 ST 063 FY24 McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction 0 5,850,000 5,850,000 5,850,000 - Grants GP 420-99-273 ST 066 FY25 City Lighting LED improvements 1,350,000 1,350,000 501,074 GF GP 420-99-258 ST 052 FY22 City Bridge Maintenance Repairs (BPMP) 2,176,105 1,893,195 2,176,105 174,347 TF GP 270-90-960 ST 002 FY15 Street Light Installation - Annual Infill (Annually funded) 430,000 0 430,000 142,241 GF GP 420-99-056 ST 024 FY18 Vai Avenue Outfall 490,000 0 490,000 438,756 CR, SD GP 420-99-275 ST 065 FY25 Outfall Repairs 950,000 0 950,000 N.A. 950,000 CR, SD GP FY26 Subtotal, Page 1 (Existing & New Projects)
33,188,750 12,327,816 43,623,371 22,659,879 2,000,000
FY25-26 CIP Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT C 156
CC 04-02-2025
156 of 321
EXISTING & NEW FY25-26 PROJECTS (CON'T.)
Description City Funding External Project
Funding
Current Total
Project Budget
Remaining Funds
(3/14/25)
FY 24-25 City
Funding
Funding Type Approved Plan Budget Unit Project No. FY Initiated Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Phase 2A & Design
2,350,000 1,500,000 2,350,000 277,829 GF, Grant BTP 420-99-036 ST 053 FY21 Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Phase 2B (design
included in Phase 2A)
0 0 0 0 GF, DIL BTP 420-99-070 ST 044 FY19
Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV Bikeway - Bandley Dr. Signal 124,432 25,658 150,090 142,210 GF, DIL BTP 420-99-070 ST 044 FY19 Bollinger Road Corridor Study 106,400 425,600 532,000 532,000 CR, Grant BCSS 270-99-270 ST 067 FY25 Roadway Safety Improvements - High Friction Pavement &
Speed Feedback Signage (HSIP)
356,180 3,205,620 3,561,800 3,500,800 CR/ Grant GP 270-99-271 ST 068 FY25 Tamien Innu - East Segment 0 2,536,000 2,536,000 1,411,377 AP/Grant BTP, PTP 420-99-036 ST 050, ST 046 FY21 Tamien Innu - Central Segment
0 4,785,000 4,785,000 4,582,979 AP/Grant BTP, PTP 420-99-036 ST 050, ST 046 FY21 Tamien Innu - West Segment
0 600,000 600,000 600,000 AP/Grant BTP, PTP 420-99-036 ST 051 FY21 School Walk Audit Implementation 23,989 1,221,863 1,245,852 939,405 AP/GF GP, PTP 420-99-069 ST 034 FY19 Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) expansion - Service Center
560,000 560,000 560,000 CR CAP 420-99-272 ST 069 FY25
Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation 6,300,000 0 6,300,000 6,296,600 CR CAP 420-99-274 FVAR 004 FY25 Silicon Valley Hopper EV Parking 350,000 0 350,000 321,000 GF, TIRCP CAP 100-88-265 ST 062 FY23 Subtotal, Page 2 (Existing & New Projects) 10,171,001 14,299,741 22,970,742 19,164,200 0 Total (Existing & New Projects) 43,359,751 26,627,557 66,594,113 41,824,079 2,000,000 FY25-26 CIP Page 2 of 3 157
CC 04-02-2025
157 of 321

COMPLETED PROJECTS
Description City Funding Revenue Funding
Sources
Total Project
Budget
Remaining Funds
(3/14/25)
Funding Type Approved Plan Budget Unit Project No. FY Initiated Blackberry Farm Pool Improvements 750,000 0 750,000 31,204 GF PRSMP 420-99-073 BBF 004 FY22 Vai Avenue Outfall - Repairs* 490,000 0 490,000 438,756 CR, SD GP 420-99-275 ST 065 FY25 De Anza Boulevard Buffered Bike Lanes
530,533 166,259 530,533 10,194 GF BTP 420-99-262 ST 061 FY23 McClellan Road Separated Bike Corridor, Phase 3 164,410 2,135,000 2,299,410 99,273 AP/GF/ Grant BTP 420-99-036 ST 047 FY20 Totals (Completed Projects) (Vai is not included) 1,444,943 2,301,259 3,579,943 140,671

FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Project
(Years 2-5 show 5% escalation costs in grey text)
FY25-26
Funding
Year 2
FY26-27
Projected Cost
Year 3
FY27-28
Projected Cost
Year 4
FY28-29
Projected Cost
Year 5
FY29-30
Projected Cost
Funding Type Approved Plan Budget Unit Project No. CIP project # ADA Improvements (Annually funded) 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 130,000 GF GP/ADA 420-99-007 PVAR 002 2016-03 Citywide Facilities Condition Assessment Implementation (FCA)
940,000 2,300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 GF BCA 420-99-063 BAI 001 2019-02 Outfalls Repairs 950,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 CR, SD GP 420-99-273 ST 066 2025-03 BBF Golf Renovation: minimal repairs 1,433,250 1,504,880 1,580,150 1,659,158 BBF PRSMP, SCC totals
2,000,000 3,015,000 1,720,000 3,305,150 1,730,000
FY25-26 CIP Page 3 of 3 158
CC 04-02-2025
158 of 321
CIP FY 2024-2025 • 5-year plan ATTACHMENT C

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
FI
SCAL YEAR 2024-2025
and 5-YEAR PLAN
PROJECT LISTS from MASTER PLANS
IND
EX:

1. Bicycle Master Plan - Projects

2. Pedestrian Master Plan – Projects

3. Parks & Recreation System Master Plan (PRSMP) - Priority Projects

4. Parks & Recreation System Master Plan (PRSMP) - Park Amenities Strategic Plan Projects

5. Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan - Projects

6. Storm Drains Master Plan - Projects

7. Fiber Optic Master Plan - Projects

8. Building Condition Assessment Report - Priority Projects

9. 2022 Playgrounds Prioritization List
Storm Drain Master Plan - Projects
Attachment C
FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 2026
CIP FY 2025 - 2026 • 5-year plan

8. Facility Condition Assessment Report - Priority Projects

10. Storm Drain Outfall Assessment Report - Priority ProjectsAttachment C

ATTACHMENT D
159
CC 04-02-2025
159 of 321

1. From the 2016 Bicycle
Transportation Master Plan

1. BIKE
FY 2023-24 CIP 5-Year Plan
160
CC 04-02-2025
160 of 321

––
City of Cupertino
2016 Bicycle Transportation
Plan

June 2016

161
CC 04-02-2025
161 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
Alta Planning + Design | 6-1

Chapter 6:

Implementation Strategy
162
CC 04-02-2025
162 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
Alta Planning + Design | 6-1

6. Implementation Strategy
This chapter presents a prioritized list of the individual infrastructure improvements, including the evaluation criteria and scoring method, project cost estimates, and a list of prioritized projects.

Project Evaluation Strategy
All of the proposed infrastructure projects are evaluated against the criteria described in
Table 6-1, which was
developed jointly with City staff and the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission. P rojects are sorted into short, mid, and long- term priority tiers based on a logical breakdown of scores and complexities of implementation. Appendix A to this Working Paper provides the full evaluation criteria breakdown.

The intent of evaluating projects is to create a prioritized list of projects for implementation. As projects are implemented, lower ranked projects move up the list. When implementing sections of the Bike Boulevard n etwork, the City should consider the removal of parallel existing bike routes where they prove to be duplicative or potentially confusing to bicyclists. This should also be coordinated with the
recommended Citywide Wayfinding Study.

The project list and individual projects to be included in this Plan are flexible concepts that serve as a guideline. The high - priority project list, and perhaps the overall project list, may change over time as a result of changing walking and bicycling patterns, land use patterns, implementation constraints and opportunities, and the development of other transportation improvements.

Table 6-1: Project Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Description Max
Score
Safety Addresses a location with a history of
bicycle collisions.
20 Stress Test
Analysis
Projects identified along a high or
medium-high stress route
5 Travel Routes
to/near
Schools
Connects to a school. 20
Network
Connectivity
Projects that closes gaps in the
bikeway network.
15 Low-Stress
Network
Improvements
Projects that add or upgrade an
existing bikeway facility to a low-stress
facility
20 Trip Generators
and Attractors
Connects to employment centers,
retail/business centers, transit,
community services, parks and
recreation facilities and/or City
facilities.
10 Feasibility/
Ease of
Implementation
The ease of implementing the project
within a five year timeframe, taking
into consideration outside agency
approval.
10 Total Possible Score 100
After scoring, projects were organized into three tiers. Tier 1 is comprised of the projects that received 67 points or more representing projects that should begin implementation
within five years . Tier 2 project s scored between 47 and 65 points and are intended to be implemented within five to 15 years. Tier 3 projects scored below 47 points and are intended for implementation within twenty years . It should be noted that projects in Tiers 2 & 3 can be initiated sooner, but that their implementation will likely be delayed.
163
CC 04-02-2025
163 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
6-2 | Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
Table 6 -2 shows the scores and cost estimates for all
recommended project improvements. Appendix B shows the
full breakdown of scores.

Table 6-2: Recommended Projects by Tier
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Tier 1
Class IV Protected
Bikeway
Stevens Creek
Blvd Foothill Blvd Tantau Ave -- 3.43 91 $4,120,00
Class IV Protected
Bikeway McClellan Rd Byrne Ave De Anza Blvd -- 1.43 80 $286,000 Configure
Intersection
Stevens Creek
Blvd Stelling Rd --
Study protected
intersection in coordination
with proposed Class IV 0 75 $550,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Tri School
East/West Bike
Blvd (#7)
Linda Vista Dr at
McClellan Rd
Hyannisport Dr at
Bubb Rd --

0.66 75 $33,000
Grade Separated
Crossing Study
Highway 85
Crossing Grand Ave Mary Ave -- 0 71 $300,000
Class I Path Union Pacific Trail Prospect Rd Stevens Creek Blvd -- 2.10 71 $1,678,000
Configure
Intersection McClellan Rd Stelling Rd --
Study protected
intersection in coordination
with proposed Class IV 0 70 $550,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Portal Ave Bike
Blvd (#5)
Portal Ave at
Merritt Dr
Portal Ave at
Wintergreen Dr -- 0.69 70 $35,000
Class IV Separated
Bikeway Finch Ave Phil Ln Stevens Creek
Blvd -- 0.45 69 $545,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
West Cupertino
North/South Bike
Blvd (#9)
Orange Ave at
Mann Dr
Fort Baker Dr at
Hyannisport Dr --

0.63 69 $32,000
Configure
Intersection McClellan Rd Westacres
Dr/Kim St --
Study peanut roundabout
to connect off-set
north/south bike routes
across McClellan 0 68 $200,000
Class I Path I-280 Channel
Bike Path
Mary Ave/Meteor
Dr
Tantau
Ave/Vallco Pkwy -- 2.87 61 $2,293,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Civic Center to
Sterling Barnhart
Rodrigues Ave at
Blaney Ave
Sterling Barnhart
Park -- 1.41 67 $70,000
164
CC 04-02-2025
164 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
Alta Planning + Design | 6-3
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Park Bike Blvd
(#2)
Tier 2
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane De Anza Blvd Homestead Rd Bollinger Rd -- 1.73 65 $242,000 Class IV Separated
Bikeway Stelling Rd Prospect Rd 250 South of
McClellan Rd -- 1.45 65 $290,000
Class IV Separated
Bikeway Stelling Rd 250 South of
McClellan Rd Alves Dr -- 0.71 64 $857,000
Class IV Separated
Bikeway Blaney Ave Bollinger Rd Homestead Rd -- 1.91 64 $383,000 Class IV Separated
Bikeway
Stevens Creek
Blvd Foothill Blvd St Joseph Ave -- 0.62 63 $124,000
Class IV Separated
Bikeway Stelling Rd Alves Dr Homestead Rd -- 0.84 63 $124,000 Class I Path Amelia Ct/Varian
Way Connector Amelia Ct Varian Way -- 0.05 63 $100,000
Grade Separated
Crossing Study Carmen Rd Stevens Creek
Blvd - South Side
Stevens Creek
Blvd - North Side -- 0 62 $300,000
Configure
Intersection
Stevens Creek
Blvd De Anza Blvd -- Bike lane striping through
intersection 0 62 $10,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Mary Ave to
Portal Ave Bike
Blvd (#4)
Mary Ave at
Meteor Dr
Portal Ave at
Merritt Dr -- 1.51
60 $75,000
Class II Bike Lane Vista Dr Forest Ave Stevens Creek
Blvd -- 0.24 60 $15,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Tri-School
North/South Bike
Blvd (#8)
Santa Teresa Dr
at Hyannisport Dr
Terrace Dr at
Bubb Rd -- 0.76
59 $38,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Bollinger Rd De Anza Blvd Lawrence Expy -- 2.00 56 $278,000 Configure
Intersection De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd --
Rebuild intersection to
facilitate safer east/west
travel between McClellan
and Pacific
0 56 $200,000
Configure
Intersection Wolfe Rd Stevens Creek
Blvd -- Study removal of slip lanes
and/or porkchop islands. 0 55 $100,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Mary Ave Stevens Creek
Blvd Meteor Dr -- 0.71 55 $100,000
165
CC 04-02-2025
165 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
6-4 | Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Miller Ave Bollinger Rd Calle de
Barcelona -- 0.48 54 $67,000
Configure
Intersection Infinite Loop Merritt Dr --
Improve signage/striping
to delineate bike/ped
space in connector
0 54 $2,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Homestead Rd Mary Ave Wolfe Rd -- 1.97 52 $276,000 Reconfigure
wall/fence Greenleaf Dr Mariani Ave --
2015 Bike Plan Update,
create gap in wall to
connect bike routes 0 52 $25,000
Class III Bike
Boulevards
Civic Center to
Jollyman Park
Bike Blvd (#1)
Rodrigues Ave at
De Anza Blvd Jollyman Park --

0.86 52 $43,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Prospect Rd De Anza Blvd Stelling Rd -- 0.42 49 $59,000 Configure
Intersection McClellan Rd Rose Blossom Dr -- Facilitate through bike travel to De Anza 0 49 $20,000
Trail Crossing Homestead Rd Mary Ave --
Redesign intersection of
Homestead at Mary to
better facilitate bicycles
exiting Mary Ave bridge
path 0 49 $10,000
Class III Bike Route Hyde Ave Bike
Route (#6)
Hyde Ave at
Shadygrove Dr
Hyde Ave at
Bollinger Rd -- 0.24 49 $500
Configure
Intersection Stelling Rd Alves Dr -- Enhance east/west bike route crossing for Alves Dr 0 48 $50,000
Class I Path Regnart Creek
Path Pacifica Dr Estates Dr -- 0.83 48 $664,000
Reconfigure
wall/fence Wheaton Dr Perimeter Rd --
Connect bike blvd to
proposed bike path on
Perimeter road, requires
creating gap in existing
wall 0 47 $10,000
Tier 3
Class II Bike Lane Rainbow Dr Bubb Rd Stelling Rd -- 0.50 46 $33,000 Class I Path Perimeter Rd Stevens Creek
Blvd
I-280 Channel
Bike Path -- 0.59 44 $470,000
166
CC 04-02-2025
166 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
Alta Planning + Design | 6-5
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Class III Bike Route
Mary Ave to
Vallco Mall Bike
Route (#7)
Memorial Park End of Wheaton
Dr -- 1.77
44 $4,000
Class III Bike Route Tantau Ave Bike
Route (#9)
Tantau Ave at
Bollinger Rd
Tantau Ave at
Barnhart Ave -- 0.41 44 $500
Class III Bike Route
Rose Blossom/
Huntridge Bike
Route (#8)
Rose Blossom Dr
at McClellan Rd
Huntridge Ln at
De Anza Blvd -- 0.41
43 $1,000
Class I Path Wilson Park Rodrigues Ave Wilson Park Path -- 0.03 42 $50,000 Class III Bike
Boulevard
Stevens Creek
Bike Blvd (#6)
San Fernando
Ave at Orange
Ave
Carmen Rd at
Stevens Creek
Blvd
-- 1.12
42 $47,000
Configure
Intersection Blaney Ave Wheaton Dr -- Enhance bicycle crossing across Wheaton 0 41 $50,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek
Blvd McClellan Rd -- 0.55 41 $77,000
Configure
Intersection Stelling Rd Rainbow Dr --
Study removal of slip lanes,
study potential for
protected intersection 0 40 $20,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Homestead Rd Wolfe Rd Tantau Ave -- 0.49 40 $69,000 Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Wolfe Rd Stevens Creek
Blvd
I-280 Channel
Bike Path -- 0.40 39 $56,000
Class I Path Jollyman Park Stelling Rd Dumas Dr -- 0.15 39 $119,000 Reconfigure
wall/fence Imperial Ave Alcazar Ave -- Create gap in fence to connect bike routes 0 39 $20,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek
Blvd I-280 N Offramp -- 0.96 39 $135,000
Class III Bike
Boulevard
Foothill to
Stevens Creek
Bike Blvd (#3)
Foothill Blvd at
Starling Dr
Carmen Rd at
Stevens Creek
Blvd
-- 0.99
38 $50,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Lazaneo Dr Bandley Dr De Anza Blvd -- 0.09 38 $13,000 Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Wolfe Rd Perimeter Rd Homestead Rd -- 0.62 38 $86,000 Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Bubb Rd McClellan Rd Stevens Creek
Blvd -- 0.53 37 $74,000
167
CC 04-02-2025
167 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
6-6 | Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Grade Separated
Crossing Study
UPRR West
Cupertino
Crossing
Hammond Snyder
Loop Trail
Stevens Creek
Blvd --
0 37 $300,000
Bike/Ped Bridge
Enhancement
Mary Ave Ped
Bridge I280 --
Improved signage/striping
to delineate bike/ped
space on Mary Ave bridge 0 37 $20,000
Class I Path
Oaks
Development
Bike Path
Stevens Creek
Blvd Mary Ave --

0.13 35 $102,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Miller Ave Calle de
Barcelona
Stevens Creek
Blvd -- 0.39 35 $54,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Tantau Ave Stevens Creek
Blvd Pruneridge Ave -- 0.65 35 $91,000
Trail Crossing McClellan Rd Union Pacific
Railroad Path -- Coordinate crossing with
signal. 0 34 $10,000
Class II Bike Lane Pacifica Dr De Anza Blvd Torre Ave -- 0.17 33 $11,000 Freeway
interchange
enhancement
Wolfe Rd I-280 Overpass --
Add green paint to
interchange approaches,
stripe bike lane through
interchange intersection
0 30 $40,000
Class I Path
San Tomas-
Aquino Creek
Trail
Sterling/Barnhart
Park Calvert Dr --

0.37 30 $294,000
Class I Path
San Tomas-
Aquino Creek
Trail
South of I280 Stevens Creek
Blvd --

0.17 30 $138,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Vallco Pkwy Tantau Ave Perimeter Rd -- 0.30 30 $42,000 Class II Bike Lane
Campus
Dr/Stevens Creek
Blvd Connector
Campus Dr Stevens Creek
Blvd --

0.11 30 $7,000
Class III Bike Route
Hwy 85 to
Stevens Creek
Blvd Bike Route
(#5)
Grand Ave at
Alhambra Ave
Peninsula Ave at
Stevens Creek
Blvd
-- 0.19
30 $1,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Rainbow Dr De Anza Blvd Stelling Rd -- 0.57 28 $79,000 Class III Bike Route Bollinger Rd to
Stevens Creek
Johnson Ave at
Bollinger Rd
Stern Ave at
Stevens Creek
Blvd
-- 0.84
28 $1,500
168
CC 04-02-2025
168 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
Alta Planning + Design | 6-7
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Blvd Bike Route
(#1)
Class III Bike Route
Civic Center to
Creekside Park
Bike Route (#2)
Torre Ave at
Rodrigues Ave
Estates Dr at
Creekside Park
Path
-- 1.24
28 $3,000
Class III Bike Route
Garden Gate
Elementary to
Memorial Park
Bike Route (#4)
Ann Arbor Dr at
Greenleaf Dr Memorial Park -- 0.42
26 $1,500
Freeway
interchange
enhancement
De Anza Blvd Hwy 85 Overpass --
Add green paint to
interchange approaches,
stripe bike lane through
interchange intersection 0 26 $40,000
Trail Crossing Bubb Rd Union Pacific
Railroad Path -- Coordinate crossing with
signal. 0 25 $10,000
Freeway
interchange
enhancement
Stevens Creek
Blvd Hwy 85 Overpass --
Add green paint to
interchange approaches,
stripe bike lane through
interchange intersection 0 25 $40,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Tantau Ave Pruneridge Ave Homestead Rd -- 0.37 25 $52,000 Freeway
interchange
enhancement
De Anza Blvd I-280 Overpass --
Add green paint to
interchange approaches,
stripe bike lane through
interchange intersection
0 24 $40,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane
Stevens Canyon
Rd McClellan Rd Rancho Deep Cliff
Dr -- 0.23 24 $33,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Bollinger Rd 200 feet East of
Westlynn Way De Foe Dr -- 0.18 24 $26,000
Class I Path
Linda Vista
Park/Deep Cliff
Golf Course
Linda Vista Park
Parking Lot off
Linda Vista Dr
McClellan Rd --

0.46 24 $366,000
Class II Buffered
Bike Lane Pruneridge Ave Tantau Ave City Limits - East -- 0.07 22 $9,000 Configure
Intersection Portal Ave Wheaton Dr --
2015 Bike Plan Update,
study roundabout
conversion 0 20 $150,000
Class II Bike Lane Cristo Rey Dr 150 feet East of
Cristo Rey Pl Roundabout -- 0.57 19 $37,000
169
CC 04-02-2025
169 of 321
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy
6-8 | Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
Project Location Start End Notes Miles
Total
Score
Rounded
Cost
Class III Bike Route
Westlynn/
Fallenleaf Bike
Route (#11)
Bollinger Rd at
Westlynn Way
Fallenleaf Ln at
De Anza Blvd -- 0.37
18 $1,000
Class III Bike Route Foothill Blvd Bike
Route (#3)
Palm Ave at
Scenic Blvd
Lockwood Dr at
Stevens Creek
Blvd
-- 0.81
16 $1,500
Class III Bike Route
Union Pacific to
Hwy 85 Bike
Route (#10)
September Dr at
McClellan Rd
Jamestown Dr at
Prospect Rd -- 1.48
13 $5,000

170
CC 04-02-2025
170 of 321

2. From the 2018 Pedestrian
Transportation Master Plan

2. PED
FY 2023-24 CIP 5-Year Plan
171
CC 04-02-2025
171 of 321
# Project Location Start End Score Status/Notes
1 Sidewalk McClellan Road San Leandro Ave Orange Ave 80 Complete 2 Sidewalk McClellan Road Bonny Dr McClellan Pl 80 Complete 3 Grade Separated Crossing SR 85 Overcrossing Grand Ave Mary Ave 75 4 Sidewalk McClellan Road SR 85 overcrossing Rose Blossom Dr 75 Complete 5 Sidewalk Orange Ave Granada Ave Alcazar Ave 75 Complete 6 Crosswalk Stelling Road Alves Dr 75 Complete
7 Shorten Turn Lane Stevens Creek Blvd
Oaks Shopping Center
Entrance 75
Westport to complete. Design in
progress
8 Add Right-Turn Phase Stevens Creek Blvd SR 85 NB On-ramp 75 Westport to complete. Design in
progress
9 Shorten Turn Lane Stevens Creek Blvd
De Anza College West
Entrance 75
10 Sidewalk Byrne Ave McClellan Rd Granada Ave 70 Complete 11 Grade Separated Crossing Carmen Road
Stevens Creek Blvd south
side
Stevens Creek Blvd north
side 70
Feasibility Study complete.

Funding to be requested for
future phases
12 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (east side) Stevens Creek Blvd Rancho Ventura St 70 13 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (west side) Stevens Creek Blvd Rancho Ventura St 70 14 Shared-use Path Junipero Serra Trail Mary Ave Vallco Parkway 70 Design of east and central
segments in progress.
15 Class 1 Path Mary Ave Don Burnett Bridge Stevens Creek Blvd 70 Separeted bikeway complete in
lieu of Class 1 path, deemed
infeasible
16 Sidewalk Mary Ave Dog Park Oaks Shopping Center 70
17 Bike/Ped Bridge McClellan Road at Stevens Creek 70
Partial funding received for
bridge replacement
18 Shared-use Path Regnart Creek Trail Pacifica Dr E. Estates Dr 70 Complete 19 Sidewalk Stelling Road Catalano Ct Orion Ct 70
20 Class 1 Path Oaks Shopping Center Mary Ave Stevens Creek Blvd 70 Westport to complete Class III in
lieu of Class I
21 Grade Separated Crossing Linda Vista Trail at McClellan Rd 65 22 Install Curb Extensions Stevens Creek Blvd at Phar Lap Dr 65 Design complete. No funding for
construction. May use posts
23 Bike/Ped Bridge and Sidewalk UPRR/Stevens Creek Blvd UPRR Foothill Blvd 65 24 Sidewalk Bubb Rd Edward Wy Krzich Pl 60
25 Reconfigure Intersection De Anza Blvd at McClellan Rd 60 Design complete. Awaiting
Caltrans approval for bidding
26 Install Curb Extensions Phil Ln at Finch Ave 60
27 Reconfigure Intersection Torre Ave at Town Center Ln 60 28 Shared-use Path Union Pacific RR north of Stevens Creek Blvd South City limit 60 Project shelved 29 Shared-use Path West side Vallco Property Junipero Serra Trail Stevens Creek Blvd 60 Project shelved 30 Sidewalk Foothill Blvd (east side) Rancho Ventura St Walnut Cir 55 31 Shared-use Path
Linda Vista Trail and Stevens
Creek Trail McClellan Ranch
Stevens Creek County
Park 55 Linda Vista Trail complete
32 Sidewalk Blackberry Farm Entrance Road Bynre Ave Blackberry Farm 55 Feasibility Study complete. No
funding for future phases.
33 Shared-use Path Wilson Park Portal Ave Rodrigues Ave 55 34 Stop sign Alves Dr At Saich Way 45
35 Install Curb Extensions Bandley Dr at Mariani Ave (SE corner) 45 Design complete. No funding for
construction. May use posts
36 Bike/Ped Connection Imperial Ave Alcadar Ave Almaden Ave 45 37 Install Curb Extensions and High
Vis Crosswalk Rainbow Dr at Gardenside Ln 45 Completed with flexible posts 38 Shared-use Path Saratoga Creek Barnhard-Sterling Park Stevens Creek Blvd 40 Funding being requested for
feasibility study
39 Stop sign Alves Dr at Beardon Dr 35
40 Install Curb Extensions Bandley Dr at Alves (south leg) 35 41 Sidewalk Beardon Dr Alves Dr Valley Green Dr 35
42 Sidewalk Alcalde Rd Footill Blvd Avenida Ln 30
43 Install Curb Extensions, High-Vis
Crosswalk and consider stop sign Bandley Dr at Lazaneo Dr 30 High-vis crosswalk with RRFB
installed
44 Install RRFB Valley Green Dr at Bandley Dr (west leg) 30 Complete
In progress or partially complete
Not funded
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Pedestrian Transportation Master Plan:

PRIORITY PROJECTS - STATUS
FEBRUARY 2023
172
CC 04-02-2025
172 of 321

3. From the 2018 Parks and
Recreation System Master Plan

3. PARKS & REC
FY 2023-24 CIP 5-Year Plan
173
CC 04-02-2025
173 of 321
introduction
There are a variety of opportunities for enhancing and
developing parks and facilities to achieve community
goals for Cupertino’s park and recreation system. This
document provides an overview of city park sites with a description, focus, short and longer term opportunities, and current and planned implementation efforts.

The key on the following page lists 22 types of community goals and icons which denote which goals are being
addressed at each park throughout the document. A page for each park or park category provides photos as well
as a brief description. The park focus identifies the park’s primary function. The implementation narrative provides context for current and planned site enhancement from
Fiscal Year 2019-20 through Fiscal Year 2023-24. For
recently built or recently renovated parks, near-term
opportunities emphasize sustaining existing uses and
maintaining the facilities with some opportunities for
diversifying recreation options. For older parks and
facilities that have not been recently updated, potential site enhancements usually include more extensive
opportunities.
park sites
This document includes site opportunities for the parks listed below.
• Memorial Park
• Creekside Park
• Jollyman Park
• Wilson Park
• Stevens Creek Corridor Park – including Blackberry
Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and
McClellan Ranch Preserve/McClellan Ranch West
• Portal Park
• Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center
• Linda Vista Park
• Hoover Park
• Varian Park
• Civic Center – including Civic Center Plaza, and
Library Field
• Three Oaks Park
• Somerset Park
• Small Neighborhood Parks – including Canyon Oak
Park, Franco Park, Little Rancho Park, Mary Ave.

Dog Park, and Sterling Barnhart Park

MASTER PLAN PARK SITE IMPLEMENTATION
Strategic Plan
Parks and Recreation System Master Plan:

STRATEGIC PLAN PROJECTS
174
CC 04-02-2025
174 of 321
key
Nature Play Areas
Universal/All-Inclusive Play Areas
Water Play
Improved Outdoor Event Space – Citywide Events
Improved Outdoor Event Space – Neighborhood Events
Multi-Use Sport Fields
Cricket Field
Dog Park(s)/Dog Off-Leash Area(s)
Basketball Courts
Pickleball Courts
Gardens
Outdoor Recreation Diversity
Improved Comfort & Amenities
Natural Vegetation Enhancements
Neighborhood Parks
Trails and Trail Corridors
Aquatics Facility
Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use Recreation Center
Performing/Fine Arts Center
Enhanced Teen Space or Services
Expanded Senior Center or Services
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing Building
175
CC 04-02-2025
175 of 321

MEMORIAL PARK
Description
Memorial Park was originally constructed in the early and mid 1970’s. Additional elements have been added since,
such as the Veterans Memorial in 2007. Memorial Park is the city’s largest park, with 22 acres (including the Senior and Quinlan Community centers). It offers 6 lighted tennis courts, a lighted baseball field, an outdoor amphitheater and stage, walking paths, reservable group picnicking,
two playgrounds, restrooms, and lawn areas. Memorial
Park hosts the city’s large outdoor events such as the
Cherry Blossom, Kids ‘N Fun, and Diwali festivals. The
amphitheater is home to annual Shakespeare in the Park, Summer Concert series, and Cinema at Sundown events.

FOCUS
Community hub and multi-use, civic-focused event space.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪ Engage the public in developing a site master
plan for Memorial Park as a community
hub and multi-use, civic-focused event
space. Include the presence of the Quinlan
Community, Senior, and Sports centers in
planning Memorial Park as a community space.
▪ Consider repurposing the inactive pond,
renovating the amphitheater, adding
walking path improvements and playable
water feature, enhancing the tree canopy,
integrating natural features, and renovating,
adding and/or expanding recreation facilities
to enhance indoor and outdoor event space,
community gathering space, active/healthy
recreation uses and play opportunities.
▪ Clarify the role of memorials at this site,
addressing opportunities to make a
community-building statement and/or
tribute to community cohesiveness.

Short Term
▪ Implement Phase 1 improvements in
the pond/amphitheater area.
▪ Consider nature integration, shade,
ADA accessibility, pathway and seating
improvements, pond re-purposing,
and other elements consistent with
the site master plan process.

Longer Term
▪ Phase in additional improvements, including
improvements to existing facilities, based on the
site master plan, and the addition of recreation
opportunities. Pending the site master plan,
this may potentially include major facilities
(such as an aquatic facility, gymnasium/
recreation center, senior center expansion
and/or a potential performing/fine arts center)
at this site, or as an expansion of an adjacent
recreation building that would affect this site
(Sports Center, Senior Center e.g.), as well
as the addition or repurposing of facilities.
▪ Provide connections to proposed
trails, bike lanes and bike routes.

COMMUNITY GOALS
176
CC 04-02-2025
176 of 321

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, shade, nature play, and
inclusive elements.

Pickleball court striping is being recommended at
Memorial Park. The proposal is to stripe Court 2 or 3 for both pickleball and tennis.

Fiscal Year 2021-22:

2. Restroom facilities at Memorial Park have been
rennovated.

Fiscal Year 2021-22:

3. Memorial Park - Specific Plan Design
The proposed project would include the development
of a conceptual design for Phase One, incorporating
findings from the Master Plan process and building upon the considerable input gained from the community.

Features to be considered include adding walking path
improvements, playable water feature, enhancing tree
canopy, integrating natural features, and enhancing
indoor and outdoor event and gathering space.

4. Memorial Park - Amphitheater Repairs/Upgrades:

Design and construct Memorial Park improvements as
indicated in the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, specifically addressing the needs of the amphitheater in this scope of work.

City Work Program:

5. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

Operational:

6. Turf reduction is being implemented around redwoods. 177
CC 04-02-2025
177 of 321

CREEKSIDE PARK
Description
This 13-acre site offers three tournament-quality sport fields, two basketball hoops, two playgrounds, family
picnicking with barbeques, restrooms, and a recreation
building whose community room can be rented. Creekside
Park is a popular venue for youth soccer and currently
hosts a weekly Farmers Market. The park can be accessed from Miller Avenue, and by pedestrians and cyclists via a bridge over Calabazas Creek. It is the site of the former Fremont Older School and was extensively improved with
park amenities in 1997.

FOCUS
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, and inclusive elements.

2. Annual Playground Replacement
Inclusive elements will be implemented in the design of the playground to be replaced at Creekside Park in Fiscal Year 2020-21.

City Work Program:

3. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed and
approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to
assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday
reservation feasibility.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Consider adding nature play and/or inclusive
play elements to the existing play area.
▪ Consider other enhancements to
outdoor recreation diversity.
▪ Evaluate opportunities to enhance the
recreation building and reactivate or
repurpose the concession area.
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Coordinate with results of Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment to
modify the recreation building as needed.
▪ Refresh sports fields to maintain
site use as a sports hub. Consider
artificial turf or other enhancements
to increase the playing capacity.
▪ Consider adding a full basketball court,
other sports courts, and diverse recreation
elements to support sports and active uses.
▪ Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to off-street trail and
proposed buffered bike lane.

4. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works

COMMUNITY GOALS
178
CC 04-02-2025
178 of 321
towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

5. Wi-Fi
Neighborhood Events is slated to be added to park
buildings at Creekside, Portal, and Wilson Parks. This
works toward the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program
item to upgrade wireless access in public spaces.
179
CC 04-02-2025
179 of 321

JOLLYMAN PARK
Description
Constructed in the early 1990’s, this 11.2-acre park
offers soccer play, a baseball field with batting cage, two playground areas, a basketball hoop, turf areas, family picnic areas with barbeques, restrooms, and a walking
loop.

FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for sports, recreation
programs and activities.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, and outdoor table tennis. This works toward the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program
item to install a drinking fountain and bottle filling station at City Hall and Jollyman Park.

Fiscal Year 2019-20:

2. Inclusive Play Area - Planning

3. Restroom facilities at Jollyman Park have been
rennovated.

Fiscal Year 2020-21:

4. All-Inclusive Playground
The City has addressed an inclusive play area through two capital improvement projects to date: Inclusive Play Area - Planning and All-Inclusive Playground. These items work towards the goals set for the All Inclusive Playground
project in Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Pursue adding an all-inclusive play area,
grouped seating, a picnic shelter, continuous
all-weather loop path (that includes the
east part of the park), and neighborhood-
serving event utilities and infrastructure.
▪ Sustain existing uses.
▪ Respond to community request
for trial off-leash dog area.

Longer Term
▪ Consider additional diverse amenities,
such as outdoor fitness equipment/
parcourse or a full-size basketball court.
▪ Provide connections to bikeway
improvements on Stelling Rd.
▪ Consider for location of development
of major new facilities.

City Work Program:

5. Dog Off-Leash Area (DOLA) Trial
The DOLA at the Jollyman Park ballfield is currently
underway. Research for a second location has been
performed and will be presented to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for review/recommendation to
City Council. This trial progresses work on the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item calling for the review of athletic fields for use as DOLAs.

6. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed
and approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This

COMMUNITY GOALS
180
CC 04-02-2025
180 of 321
completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday reservation feasibility.

7. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.
181
CC 04-02-2025
181 of 321

WILSON PARK
Description
This ~10-acre park includes three baseball fields on
the west side of the site and serves as the community’s baseball hub. The east side of the site features two
playgrounds, family picnicking, restrooms, pathways,
a large turf area, and a recreation building that hosts ceramics programs. The eastern part of Wilson Park was
constructed in the late 1960’s. Park improvements on
the western part, including the baseball fields, batting cage and concession building, were constructed in 1992.

A portion of the site was renovated in 2003 (restroom
building, play area).

FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for sports, recreation
and activities.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, outdoor table tennis, and inclusive elements.

City Work Program:

2. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed and
approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to
assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday
reservation feasibility.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Consider adding neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, picnic
shelter, and a large/full-size basketball court.
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Evaluate use of and desirability of
renovating/replacing the ceramics building,
particularly if ceramics can be incorporated
into a fine arts or recreation facility,
and in coordination with Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
▪ Consider a wider, maintenance-friendly
loop path, community garden, variety of
sports courts, activity hubs, and diverse
recreation elements, including those
that provide challenge elements.
▪ Consider full-size basketball court.
▪ Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to nearby bikeways and
proposed off-street trail. If desired, a sport
field can fit on the east portion of the
site (with relocation of the central play
area and picnicking reconfiguration).

3. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works

COMMUNITY GOALS
182
CC 04-02-2025
182 of 321
towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

4. Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi is slated to be added to park buildings at Creekside, Portal, and Wilson Parks. This works toward the Fiscal
Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to upgrade wireless access in public spaces.
183
CC 04-02-2025
183 of 321
Description

BLACKBERRY FARM PARK
Blackberry Farm was acquired by the City in 1991. It
has been subsequently renovated, including extensive
improvements in 2009 which also included the Stevens
Creek Trail and creek restoration. The trail and creek
corridor parkland are open daily. The group picnic
grounds and pool complex are operated seasonally,
currently from May to September, within a 100-day
window. Seasonal amenities include two swimming
pools with pool buildings and lawn area, reservable group picnic area with barbeques and sinks, and food service
concession. Additional amenities include two volleyball courts, two bocce courts, two horseshoe pits, picnic tables, playground, lawn area, trail, and restrooms. The creek
corridor setting, all-weather trail, and wildlife viewing opportunities are popular year-round.

BLACKBERRY FARM GOLF COURSE
Blackberry Farm Golf Course is a nine-hole Par 29 golf
facility acquired by the City in 1991, from private owners who had built it in 1962. The course, located along
Stevens Creek, offers narrow tree-lined fairways and small greens which reward accuracy. The course includes a
putting green and a range structure for drive practice. A pro shop with golf merchandise and a restaurant are on
site; professional instruction is available. Footgolf is also offered.

MCCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE
& MCCLELLAN RANCH WEST
Purchased by the City 1972, McClellan Ranch has a rich
history, including uses for agriculture and as a horse
ranch. The site contains various buildings relating to

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪ Complete the Stevens Creek
Corridor Master Plan.

Short Term
▪ Phase in improvements as guided by the
site master plan, enhancing natural/habitat
areas and facilities supporting environmental
education, gatherings and recreation uses,
while retaining the natural character of the
park. Provide connections to any extension
of the Stevens Creek Trail and nearby
bikeways. Provide trailhead amenities.

Complete feasibility work & if approved,
pursue implementation of improved
pedestrian and bicycle access to Blackberry
Farm Park via San Fernando Ave. Evaluate
steps for expanded use of Blackberry Farm.

Longer Term
▪ Implement renovation of Stocklmeir Ranch,
Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry
Farm Park, and/or McClellan Ranch Preserve
and West, and other corridor parcels,
consistent with the recommendations of
the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.

STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK
its past as well as the relocated Parrish tank house and Blacksmith Shop. A new Environmental Education Center
was completed in 2015. The 4-H area was renovated and
Stevens Creek Trail constructed in 2008-2009. McClellan Ranch is the hub of the city’s environmental education
activities and hosts City Naturalist-led programs. This site offers community gardens for residents, a stretch of Stevens Creek Trail, riparian habitat areas, plus creek

COMMUNITY GOALS
184
CC 04-02-2025
184 of 321
and wildlife views. Rolling Hills 4-H, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, and Friends of Stevens Creek Trail are housed at this site. McClellan Ranch was designated
as the city’s first and only nature and rural preserve in 1976; its name was updated to McClellan Ranch Preserve
in 2012. McClellan Ranch West, a 3.1-acre parcel, was
acquired in 1990.

FOCUS FOR STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK
Community-focused natural area supporting
environmental education, outdoor gathering and
recreation consistent with protecting wildlife and habitat value.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade including hydration stations, shade, and inclusive elements.

Fiscal Year 2020-21:

2. McClellan Ranch Preserve Community Garden
Improvements
Reconstruct the existing community garden based on
the design developed in Fiscal Year 2017-18. The project includes reconfiguration of the garden plots, improved
ADA accessibility to and within the garden, installation of new perimeter fencing, irrigation distribution system and informal meeting area. This item completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to build an efficiant and highly functional community garden at McClellan Ranch.

Fiscal Year 2021-22

3. Tree Inventory - Stevens Creek Corridor
Inventory and map City-owned trees (above a threshold
size) that are within the Stevens Creek Corridor, including the Blackberry Farm Golf Course.

City Work Program:

4. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

5. Blackberry Farm Golf Course Feasibility Study
Preliminary study to consider three options for the golf course including minimal repairs, a major renovation,
and a return to natural habitat. Initial research and
community feedback was conducted as part of the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan and the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan. Council will receive an update on the three options and determine which to pursue further for feasibility. This item is part of the Fiscal Year 2020-21 City Work Program.

6. Art in Unexpected Places
The Fine Arts Commission and Parks and Recreation
Department are collaborating on the Art in Unexpectd
Places program as part of the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City
Work Program. The program will see the installation of
mural wall art as a pilot.
185
CC 04-02-2025
185 of 321

PORTAL PARK
Description
Portal Park, designed in the late 1960’s, is one of the city’s oldest. Portal Park with its 3.8 acres offers a
reservable group picnic area, two playgrounds, rolling
turf, a recreation building and restrooms. The play areas were renovated in 2002-03. This site borders L.P. Collins Elementary School.

FOCUS
Neighborhood park and gathering space.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, shade, exercise
equipment, and inclusive elements.

City Work Program:

2. Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi is slated to be added to park buildings at Creekside, Portal, and Wilson Parks. This works toward the Fiscal
Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to upgrade wireless access in public spaces.

3. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Improve walkway lighting and signage.
▪ Explore options to share
adjacent school parking.
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Consider adding shading to the picnic
area, grouped seating, nature play area
and/or inclusive play elements, and diverse
recreation elements, such as badminton,
bocce/lawn bowling, and/or games
to support small group gatherings.
▪ Improve connections to the adjacent school.
▪ Re-evaluate the location and use of the
recreation building, considering relocating
the building or the preschool-age and child
programming or adding indoor restrooms,
and in coordination with Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
▪ Provide connections to the proposed bike
boulevard and adjacent neighborhoods.

COMMUNITY GOALS
186
CC 04-02-2025
186 of 321

MONTA VISTA PARK & RECREATION CENTER
Description
The site of a former elementary school, Monta Vista Park and Recreation Center was acquired by the City and
renovated as a park in 1982. Additional improvements to the softball area occurred in 1993. This 6.2-acre park offers a two-building recreation center including restrooms, two tennis courts, two softball fields and a batting cage, turf areas, play equipment, and family picnicking. A preschool and gymnastics/martial arts programs are currently
hosted at this site, as is girls’ softball.

FOCUS
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, outdoor exercise
equipment, nature play, and inclusive elements.

City Work Program:

2. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed and
approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to
assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday
reservation feasibility.

3. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Consider temporary options to expand
play opportunities near the preschool.
▪ Consider restriping tennis court(s)
to share for pickleball.
▪ In conjunction with major facility business
plans, explore opportunities to relocate or
expand the gymnastics/martial arts and
preschool programs to other facilities.
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Address renovation or replacement of the
existing multi-use and preschool buildings
based on major facility recommendations
and in coordination with Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
▪ Consider adding a basketball court,
picnic shelter, neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, and
other diverse recreation elements.
▪ Provide connections to proposed
buffered bikeway.

Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

Operational:

4. Monta Vista Park will see turf reduction and native
plantings incoroporated into current landscaping.

COMMUNITY GOALS
187
CC 04-02-2025
187 of 321

LINDA VISTA PARK
Description
This 11-acre park site includes a reservable large group picnic/barbecue area, two playground areas (preschool
and elementary), a fitness station, restrooms, and an
extensive turf area. It was acquired in 1968 and renovated to its current configuration in 1986.

FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for picnicking and
nature-based recreation.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, shade, nature play, and inclusive elements.

Fiscal Year 2019-20:

2. Linda Vista Trail
Design and construct a bicycle pedestrian trail between Linda Vista Park and McClellan Road.

City Work Program:

3. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Select design concept to repair or repurpose
the inactive ponds. Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Repair or renovate the ponds
(per 2014 technical report).
▪ Consider adding neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, a picnic
shelter or pavilion, a destination nature
play and/or water play area, and diverse
recreation elements, potentially including
adventure and challenge elements.
▪ Consider a community garden or
demonstration, healing, or rain garden.
▪ Provide trailhead amenities and connections
to the proposed off-street trail. Consider
installing outdoor exercise equipment
in addition to, or as replacement for,
existing parcourse equipment.

Operational:

4. Sucessional Tree Plantings
58 trees donated by Stanford Sports will be planted at
various park locations. Five have been planted at Linda Visa Park.

COMMUNITY GOALS
188
CC 04-02-2025
188 of 321

HOOVER PARK
Description
Hoover Park is a 5-acre site built in 1987 that offers
two sport fields, two playgrounds for elementary and
preschool-age children, basketball hoop, and family
picnicking.

FOCUS
Neighborhood park and recreation and sports space.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, shade, outdoor exercise equipment, and inclusive elements.

City Work Program:

2. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed and
approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to
assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday
reservation feasibility.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Consider adding a community garden
and diverse recreation elements.
▪ Consider providing a larger/
full-size basketball court.
▪ Consider a looped walking
path and restrooms.

COMMUNITY GOALS
189
CC 04-02-2025
189 of 321

VARIAN PARK
Description
This is a 6.3-acre site includes two tennis courts, two playgrounds, an apricot orchard, lawn areas, walkways,
and family picnic areas. It is adjacent to Stevens Creek Elementary School.

FOCUS
Neighborhood park with tennis, passive recreation,
orchard and habitat focus.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, nature play, and
inclusive elements.

2. Annual Playground Replacement
Inclusive elements will be implemented in the design of the playground to be replaced at Creekside Park in Fiscal Year 2020-21.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Consider expanding or replacing play
area with nature play area and/or
thematic or inclusive play elements.
▪ Consider restriping tennis court(s)
to share for pickleball.
▪ Consider other enhancements for
outdoor recreation diversity.
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Consider diverse recreation
elements focused on passive
uses and nature education.
▪ Consider community garden, outdoor
classroom, pollinator patches,
and interpretive signage.
▪ Maintain connections to adjacent school.
▪ Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to proposed bikeway.

COMMUNITY GOALS
190
CC 04-02-2025
190 of 321
CIVIC CENTER ─ PLAZA & LIBRARY FIELD
Description
The civic center plaza was renovated in 2004 as part of construction of the new Library and Community Hall. The site forms the heart of the city’s civic center. The one-acre plaza hosts a popular interactive fountain. It also offers benches, landscaping, wifi availability, and hosts annual community events such as Earth & Arbor Day and the
springtime Big Bunny 5K & Kids Fun Run.

The 3-acre Library Field is adjacent to the Cupertino
Library and Civic Center. It is currently used by both
youth cricket and youth volleyball teams for sports
activities, and hosts occasional special events. Its east side is bordered by Regnart Creek.

FOCUS
Multi-use civic space for green space, recreation,
gathering, and programming.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, outdoor work space,
shade, and water play. This works toward the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to install a drinking
fountain and bottle filling station at City Hall and
Jollyman Park.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term - Civic Center
▪ Sustain existing uses in the short term.
▪ Evaluate Civic Center Master Plan in relation
to major new facility discussions to clarify
use of Civic Center, and adjacent areas.

Short Term - Library Field
▪ Sustain existing uses pending decision on
implementation of Civic Center Master
Plan and cricket field long-term location.
▪ Consider creating a separate parcel
for Library Field and rezoning it as PR
zoning (park and recreation).

Longer Term - Library FIeld
▪ Consider the addition of major
facilities, relocation of cricket field if
a better site is identified, and long-
term options as civic center-related
space or permanent green space.
▪ Consider whether adjacent parking
can be put underground to expand
Library Field and green space.

City Work Program:

2. Athletic Field Use Policy
The updated Athletic Field Use Policy was reviewed and
approved by City Council on May 4, 2021. This completes the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item to
assess the Athletic Field Use Policy, including Sunday
reservation feasibility.

COMMUNITY GOALS
191
CC 04-02-2025
191 of 321

3. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.
192
CC 04-02-2025
192 of 321
Description
This 3.1-acre neighborhood park was constructed in
1980, with a later renovation of the play area in 1996.

Three Oaks Park offers playgrounds, family picnicking,
walkways and lawn space. It is also known for the
distinctive large oak trees that are its namesake.

FOCUS
Neighborhood park with nature emphasis.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, outdoor exercise equipment,
and inclusive elements.

City Work Program:

2. Neighborhood Events
Neighborhood Events has featured several cultrual events in parks across Cupertino. The Parks and Recreation
Department’s goal moving forward is to provide a
minimum of three cultural events and a series of art
events as part of the summer program lineup. This works towards the Fiscal Year 2019-20 City Work Program item
for Arts and Cultural Festivals and Programs.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Address successional tree plantings
to maintain character.
▪ Consider adding nature play area and/
or inclusive elements and repurposing or
improving the southeasterly rock play area.
▪ Consider adding neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, and
diversifying recreation opportunities.

THREE OAKS PARK

COMMUNITY GOALS
193
CC 04-02-2025
193 of 321
Description
Somerset Park was constructed in the early 1970’s and
renovated in 1996. Somerset Park’s neighborhood enjoys
its 1.7 acres of picnic area, playground, basketball hoop, trees, and lawn space.

FOCUS
Neighborhood park.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, seating, outdoor exercise
equipment, nature play, and inclusive elements.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.

Longer Term
▪ Consider adding a community
garden, dog area, and/or larger
basketball area or other amenities.
▪ Provide trailhead amenities and connections
to the De Anza Trail if it is implemented.

SOMERSET PARK

COMMUNITY GOALS
194
CC 04-02-2025
194 of 321

SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Description

CANYON OAK PARK
Constructed in the early 2000’s, this 0.6-acre park provides play equipment, seating, and a small lawn area. It enjoys a view to extensive open space.

FRANCO PARK
Cupertino’s Franco Park opened in January 2011. This 0.6- acre neighborhood park includes picnic tables and seating, as well as playground equipment with safety surfacing
and a perimeter fence to separate the park from adjacent streets.

LITTLE RANCHO PARK
Constructed in the early 2000’s, this 0.3-acre park
serves its neighbors with play equipment, benches, and
landscaping.

MARY AVE DOG PARK
Opened in early 2014, Mary Avenue Dog Park is
Cupertino’s first park designed for off-leash dogs. This

0.5-acre site provides a fenced areas for large and small dogs, benches, and a dog drinking fountain.

STERLING BARNHART PARK
Sterling Barnhart Park is one of the city’s newer parks and was dedicated in August 2010. This 0.5 acre site
provides playground equipment, picnicking, game table,
benches, and plantings which include California native
species. This site is bordered by Saratoga Creek and offers pedestrian-bicycle access to Saratoga Creek Trail on the opposite creek bank.

SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

CANYON OAK PARK
Short & Longer Term
▪ Maintain orientation to the view of
open space. Sustain existing uses.

FRANCO PARK
Short & Longer Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.
▪ Consider adding shade and
small group seating area.
▪ Improve pedestrian and bicycle
access from Franco Court.
▪ Evaluate possible on-street parking and
crosswalk to Franco Court access point.

LITTLE RANCHO PARK
Short & Longer Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.

MARY AVE DOG PARK
Short & Longer Term
▪ Enhance existing use.
▪ Consider adding shade, varied terrain,
small group seating areas, dog amenities
(such as dog agility features).

STERLING BARNHART PARK
Short & Longer Term
▪ Sustain existing uses.
▪ Consider effects of an extension of
Saratoga Creek Trail or the acquisition of
Lawrence-Mitty property, if pursued.

COMMUNITY GOALS
195
CC 04-02-2025
195 of 321
FOCUS
Neighborhood parks and play nodes for local use and trail connection.

Mary Ave Dog Park serves as a gathering site for dog
owners/friends.

IMPLEMENTATION
Multi-Year Funding:

1. Park Amenity Improvements
A variety of amenities are being considered for
implementation or upgrade, including hydration stations, improved waste disposal, and outdoor table tennis.
196
CC 04-02-2025
196 of 321

4. Parks & Recreation System
Master Plan (PRSMP) - Park
Amenities Strategic Plan

4. AMENITIES
FY 2023-24 CIP 5-Year Plan
2021
197
CC 04-02-2025
197 of 321

PARK AMENITIES PROJECT - INSTALLATION STRATEGY
Park
Pickleball Striping
INSTALLED: Pickleball
S
triping
Hydration Stations
INSTALLED:

H
ydration Stations
Garbage Cans/
R
ecycling Bins
(Trios)*
INSTALLED: Garbage
C
ans/ Recycling Bins
(Trios)*
Benches/
P
icnic Tables
INSTALLED: Benches/
P
icnic Tables
Shade trees
INSTALLED: Shade
t
rees
Shade structures
INSTALLED: Shade
s
tructures
Memorial 1 1 3 0 2 0 CIP-1 12 CIP
S
tevens Creek Corridor 2 0 CIP
C
reekside 3 3 8 0 1 1
Hoover 2 2 6 0 6
J
ollyman 3 1 1 0 2 0
Linda Vista 2 0 1 0 6 0 CIP
M
VRC 3 3 5 0 4 0
Portal 2 1 4 0 4 0
Varian 2 1 2 0 3 0
Wilson 4 3 4 0 3 0
Canyon Oak 1 1 0 4
F
ranco 2 0
Little Rancho 1 1 0 3 0 3
S
omerset 1 1 2 0 2 0
Sterling Barnhardt 0 2
T
hree Oaks 1 1 2 0 3 0
Civic Center 2 0 0 CIP-2 0 ?
L
ibrary Field 1 0 0 6 0
NO. OF UNITS 1 31 41 37 27 3
U
NIT COST $6,000 $2,990 $4,500 $2,000 $1,800 $350 $125,000 S

UBTOTAL BY

AMENITY/NO CIP
$6,000 $139,500 $88,986 $82,000 $66,600 $9,450 $0
C
IP SUBTOTAL $18,000 $375,000
*Garbage Cans/ Recycling Bins (Trios): counted as units, whether planned as a trio, duo, or single.

Each count as one unit.

CIP-1: Include in Memorial Park redesign
CIP-2: USB charging tables
CIP-3: add water play feature