Daly City City Council
April 24, 2023

AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC RECORDS:

All public record to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, City Hall located at 333 90th Street, Daly City, CA during normal business hours, at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body.

CITY OF DALY CITY
Regular Meeting - CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Monday, April 24, 2023 - 7:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers – 2nd Floor
City Hall 333 – 90th Street
Daly City, CA 94015
To watch the live telecast or livestream:

Comcast Channel 27, https://www.youtube.com/DalyCityVideoMeetings or https://www.dalycity.org/agendas Public Participation:

There are two ways to submit public comment: (1) submit written comments by meeting day, and (2) attend the meeting in person.

1. To submit a comment in writing, please visit www.dalycity.org/agendas and complete the Public Comment form. In the comment field box, include the item number and/or title of the item as well as your comments. Public Comments may also be emailed to [email protected] by including “Public Comment” in the subject line. All written comments received by 4:00 pm on meeting day will be provided to the City Council prior to the meeting. Comments are not read aloud into the record.

Please note: Any written comments received after 4:00 p.m. on the meeting date is not guaranteed to be received by the City Council prior to the meeting.

2. To speak at the meeting in person, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chambers and submit to a Staff Member as early in the meeting as possible.

Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in attending or participating in this meeting should call the office of the City Clerk at 991-8078 as soon as possible.

CALL TO ORDER:

PLEDGE TO THE FLAG:

ROLL CALL:

Agenda – City Council
Monday, April 24, 2023

PRESENTATIONS:

1. Proclamation - National Library Week, April 23rd-29th, Gary Pacheco, Daly City Library Board

2. Proclamation - Wildfire Preparedness Month, NCFA Assistant Fire Marshal Craig Wittner

3. Introduction of new Police Department Community Wellness and Crisis Response Team member, Malcolm McDonald

4. Gun Buyback Event– May 6th, 2023

5. Police Department Catalytic Converter Theft Prevention Program APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

6. Regular Meeting of April 10, 2023
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

PUBLIC APPEARANCES/ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

NOTE: Speakers are limited to two minutes, unless modified by the Mayor.

The Council cannot take action on any matter raised under this item.

CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and may be approved by one roll call vote of the City Council. There shall be no separate discussion of the matters on the Consent Agenda unless requested by a member of the City Council. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately at the end of the Agenda.

Resolutions:

7. Accept and Appropriate Grant Funding From CalRecycle

8. Request Use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase Licenses for a Virtual-Based Training Platform for Sworn Police Departmental Personnel

9. Support the 2023 Daly City Community Based Transportation Plan

Agenda – City Council
Monday, April 24, 2023

10. Request Time Extension for Use Permit UP-4-16-12038 and Design Review DR-4-16-12040 — Retail Conversion to Residential at 2665 Geneva Avenue Check Registers:

11. Check Registers for the Month of March 2023

END OF CONSENT AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARINGS:

12. Introduce Ordinance Amending Daly City Municipal Code Chapter 2.58 – Small Business Commission to Establish a Legacy Business Program
STAFF: Tatum Mothershead
RECOMMENDATION: Open/Close Hearing
Motion for City Attorney to Read by Title Only
Councilmember Introduce Ordinance

13. Consideration of the City’s HUD Five-Year Consolidated Plan for July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2028 and One-Year Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24
STAFF: Betsy ZoBell
RECOMMENDATION: Open/Close Hearing
Adopt Resolution by Roll Call Vote

14. Introduce Ordinance Adding Chapter 9.60 Re: Firearm Safe Storage STAFF: Cameron Christensen
RECOMMENDATION: Open/Close Hearing
Motion for City Attorney to Read by Title Only
Councilmember Introduce Ordinance

Agenda – City Council
Monday, April 24, 2023

15. General Plan Amendment GPA-8-20-14643, Zone Change ZC-8-20-14633, Major Subdivision SUB-8-20-15634, Use Permit UPR-8-20-14642, and Design Review DR-8-20-14636 — 14 Three-Story Townhomes at 141 3rd Avenue
A. Findings
B. EA (Mitigated Neg. Declaration)
C. GPA-8-20-14643, ZC-8-20-14633, SUB-8-20-15634,UPR-8-20-14642, DR-8-20-14636 STAFF: Michael Van Lonkhuysen
RECOMMENDATION: Open/Close Hearing
Motion for City Attorney to Read by Title Only
Councilmember Introduce Ordinance
Adopt Resolution by Roll Call Vote
APPOINTMENTS: Board/Commission Membership Committee Appointments REPORTS:

16. Council Committee

17. City Council

18. Staff
ADJOURNMENT:

Proclamation
NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK – APRIL 23-29, 2023
WHEREAS, libraries are accessible and inclusive places that foster a sense of connection and build community; and
WHEREAS, libraries connect people to technology, providing access to broadband internet, computers, and training that are critical for accessing education and employment opportunities; and
WHEREAS, libraries offer opportunities for everyone to connect with new ideas and become their best selves through access to multimedia content, programs, and classes – in addition to books; and
WHEREAS, in times of crisis, libraries and library professionals play an invaluable role in supporting their communities both in person and virtually; and WHEREAS, libraries strive to develop and maintain programs and collections that are as diverse as the populations they serve and ensure equity of access for all; and WHEREAS, to adapt to our changing world, libraries are expanding their resources and continuing to meet the needs of their patrons; and
WHEREAS, libraries have long served as trusted and treasured institutions for all members of the community regardless of race, ethnicity, creed, ability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or socio-economic status; and WHEREAS, libraries are cornerstones of democracy, promoting the free exchange of information and ideas for all; and
WHEREAS, libraries, librarians, and library workers are joining library supporters and advocates across the nation to celebrate National Library Week.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, RAYMOND A. BUENAVENTURA, Mayor, and members of the City Council of Daly City, do hereby proclaim April 23-29, 2023, as NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK in Daly City. During this week, we encourage all residents to connect with their library by visiting online or in person to access resources and services.

Signed and sealed by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Daly City this 24th day of April 2023.

Raymond A. Buenaventura, Mayor
Juslyn C. Manalo, Vice Mayor
Roderick Daus-Magbual, Councilmember
Pamela DiGiovanni, Councilmember
Glenn R. Sylvester, Councilmember

Proclamation

WILDFIRE PREPAREDNESS MONTH
MAY 2023
WHEREAS, in California, over 2 million homes are at risk to wildfire; and WHEREAS, last year there were 7,490 wildfires that burned 362,455 acres across the state; and
WHEREAS, ninety percent of all wildfires are human caused. Human acts of carelessness result in wildfire disasters every year; and WHEREAS, each year, more people move into wildland urban interface areas increasing the need to raise awareness to our citizens on how they can protect their property from wildfire losses; and
WHEREAS, Zonehaven has been adopted as a county wide tool to assist with informed evacuations during wildfire and we encourage “know your zone” before an emergency arises; and
WHEREAS, the North County Fire Authority encourages fire-safe behavior by all who live, work, and recreate throughout the City of Daly City; and WHEREAS, each of us can do our part to prepare for wildfire emergencies by taking steps to make effective changes to our homes and landscapes to reduce the risk of wildfire; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, RAYMOND A. BUENAVENTURA, Mayor and members of the City Council of Daly City hereby proclaim May 2023 as “WILDFIRE PREPAREDNESS MONTH” and encourage all Daly City residents to increase their knowledge and awareness of proper safety measures to protect themselves from the devastating effects of wildfires.

Signed and sealed by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Daly City this 24th day of April 2023.

Raymond A. Buenaventura, Mayor
Juslyn C. Manalo, Vice Mayor
Pamela DiGiovanni, Councilmember
Roderick Daus-Magbual, Councilmember
Glenn R. Sylvester, Councilmember

CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 10, 2023
--------------------------------
Note on Public Comments: For this meeting, members of the Council and the public had the option of attending in person or submitting public comments via email to the City Clerk’s Office prior to the public meeting. Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in attending or participating in this meeting were instructed to call the office of the City Clerk at 991-8078 prior to the meeting.

Visit https://www.youtube.com/@DalyCityVideoMeetings/streams to view the City Council meetings The meeting was called to order by Mayor Buenaventura at 7:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Present:

Raymond A. Buenaventura, Mayor
Juslyn C. Manalo, Vice Mayor
Roderick Daus-Magbual
Pamela DiGiovanni
Glenn R. Sylvester
Staff Present:

Thomas Piccolotti, City Manager
Rose L. Zimmerman, City Attorney
K. Annette Hipona, City Clerk
PRESENTATIONS:

Proclamation - Fair Housing Month
(Josie Fulton, San Mateo County Fair Housing Coordinator, Project Sentinel) APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Regular Meeting of March 27, 2023
Referring to a public comment received at the previous Council meeting, City Manager Thomas Piccolotti provided clarification on two points - no Councilmember has been assigned a City vehicle, and no Councilmember has had a City vehicle taken away from them.

Councilmember DiGiovanni voiced concern that the points brought up by Mr. Piccolotti were not said at the referenced meeting and would not be reflective of those minutes, and voiced concern with discussing anything under public comments.

Mayor Buenaventura clarified that the point of information provided by Mr. Piccolotti was to address a raised concern from a speaker, and acknowledged that no Councilmember was denied access to a City vehicle.

It was moved by Councilmember Sylvester, seconded by Vice Mayor Manalo and carried to approve the minutes of March 27, 2023, as amended.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

It was moved by Councilmember DiGiovanni, seconded by Councilmember Daus-Magbual and carried to approve the agenda.

CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 10, 2023
2 PUBLIC APPEARANCES/ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Margi Power and Kaarin Hardy, Co-founders of Leadership Council San Mateo County, spoke about their non-profit leadership development organization and the programs it offers to people in the County. Margi Powers requested Daly City’s participation in the program and offered to provide a full presentation to the Council at a future meeting. Kaarin Hardy highlighted accomplishments that were achieved by Leadership Council members through collaborations.

Bob Quinn requested that phone access for the meetings be turned on for voters who are unable to attend in person, and reported problems with viewing the meetings on TV and the City website. Mr.

Quinn voiced concern with the City Manager planning to hold engagement sessions with the community stating that that is a function of elected officials not the City Manager. Mr. Quinn stated Councilmembers should be able to access City vehicles for community meetings without argument and voiced concern with contradicting policies. Mr. Quinn stated City staff is subordinate to the Councilmembers and are required to follow their directions.

CONSENT AGENDA:

It was moved by Vice Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember DiGiovanni and carried to approve the consent agenda with the exception of items #5, #6, and #8 which were removed for discussion.

Resolutions:

Set Time and Place of Public Hearing Regarding Linda Vista Area of Benefit Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Resolution 23-58, Setting Time And Place Of Public Hearing Re: Approve Engineer’s Report And To Establish The Annual Benefit Assessments For The Linda Vista Area For Fiscal Year 2023-2024 (Hearing Date: May 22, 2023)
Amend the Professional Services Agreement with Swinerton for Project Management and Construction Support Services for Various Projects
Resolution 23-59, Authorizing Amendment To The Professional Services Agreement With Swinerton Builders DBA Swinerton Management & Consulting, Inc. For Project Management And Construction Support Services For Various Capital Project Report of Statement of Investment Policy
City Treasurer Daneca Halverson provided the staff report which included minor updates to the policy as recommended by City auditors.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember DiGiovanni and carried by voice vote to adopt the following resolution:

Resolution 23-60, Adopting The Updated Statement Of Investment Policy For The City Of Daly City

CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 10, 2023
3 Amend Traffic Regulations to Install a 98-ft Bus Stop Zone in Front of 2630 Bayshore Boulevard Director of Public Works Richard Chiu provided the staff report which included proposed changes to improve traffic safety.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember DiGiovanni and carried by voice vote to adopt the following resolution:

Resolution 23-61, Establishing Traffic Regulations
Set Time and Place of Public Hearing - Proposed Increases and Updates to the Master Fee Schedule Resolution 23-62, Setting Time And Place Of Hearing Re: Proposed Increases And Updates To The Master Fee Schedule (Hearing Date: May 8, 2023)
Councilmember Sylvester requested additional information on: cost fees, charges that were removed from the schedule, losses to the City, and requested a variance print-out.

Set Time and Place of the Public Hearing for Proposed Water Rates (Set Hearing: 6/12/2023) Director of Water and Wastewater Services Joshua Cosgrove provided the staff report for the proposed rate adjustments. Mr. Cosgrove and Ms. Zimmerman addressed questions on language that may be used in the appeal process.

It was moved by Councilmember Daus-Magbual, seconded by Vice Mayor Manalo and carried by voice vote to adopt the following resolution:

Resolution 23-63, Setting Time and Place of Hearing Re: Consideration Of Water Rate Increase Set Time and Place for Public Hearing to Consider Five-Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2023/24- 27/28 and One-Year HUD Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24 ( Set Hearing: 4/24/2023) Resolution 23-64, Setting Time And Place Of Public Hearing On Daly City’s Five-Year HUD Consolidated Plan For Fiscal Years 2023/24-2027/28 And The One-Year Action Plan For Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 Under The Community Development Block Grant And HOME Programs Check Registers:

Check Registers for the Month of February 2023

END OF CONSENT AGENDA
REPORTS:

Council Committee
Ethics Committee (Buenaventura/Manalo)

CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 10, 2023
4 City Council
Vice Mayor Manalo attended Recreation’s new dance program for older adults at the Gellert Park Rec Hall; also in attendance at the event was Commissioner Paniza. Vice Mayor Manalo reported the reopening of Burlington store at their new location in Westlake Shopping Center and acknowledged their donation to Garden Village Elementary School. The Vice Mayor joined the San Mateo County Human Services Agency event to celebrate Cesar Chavez Day which was also attended by Senator Josh Becker, Vice Mayor Keene, Supervisor Noelia Corzo, and the Filipino Mental Health Initiative. Vice Mayor Manalo thanked Daly City Police and Fire, Denise Brown and Recreation staff, and all the families for their efforts and participation during Spring Fun Day at the Westlake Gym. Vice Mayor Manalo and Mayor Buenaventura met with Seton nurses to address their concerns; the Council will continue to work closely with the senior nurses.

Councilmember DiGiovanni attended Burlington store’s re-opening and acknowledged their donation to the elementary school. Councilmember DiGiovanni thanked Denise, David, and Brian of the Recreation Department, the Daly City teens, and the Departments of Police, Fire and Library for their involvement during the Easter event geared towards children. Councilmember DiGiovanni requested the City Manager look into the public concern of smoking at public parks. Councilmember DiGiovanni relayed a citizen’s appreciation to the Police and Public Works Departments for their assistance during a traffic collision by Callan Park. Councilmember DiGiovanni stated she spoke the truth, expressed disappointment that City Manager Piccolotti made comments concerning her as a Councilmember during a public meeting, stated that Mr. Piccolotti did not allow her to check out a City vehicle in the beginning, stated she was falsely accused of abusing vehicle policy, stated this was not included in the minutes, and hoped they move forward so that she is able to attend meetings and events.

Staff:

Mr. Piccolotti acknowledged former employee Robert “Bob” Donati who worked for the City of Daly City, including a supervisory role in the Department of Water and Wastewater, for over 30 years.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Buenaventura adjourned the meeting at 7:48 PM in memory of the victims who perished today from another mass shooting.

Approved as submitted, this 24th
City Clerk
day of April , 2023.

Raymond A. Buenaventura
Mayor

City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: April 24, 2023
Subject: Accept and Appropriate Grant Funding from CalRecycle Recommended Action
Accept and appropriate a $25,890 grant for FY 2022/23 from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for implementation of recycling and diversion activities.

Background/Discussion
CalRecycle is the California State agency that promotes recycling, waste reduction, and product reuse. Through the Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program, grant funding is provided to jurisdictions to promote beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities with a goal to reach and maintain an 80 percent recycling rate for all California refund value beverage containers—aluminum, glass, plastic, and bi-metal.

The City of Daly City will use these funds to increase recycling opportunities in public and other residentials areas, host litter clean-up events, conduct marketing and create advertisements to promote recycling, and provide educational opportunities for elementary and middle schools in the community. The City of Daly City has approximately two years to expend the funding award.

Fiscal Impact
The grant revenue from CalRecycle has been awarded in one full installment of $25,890. The grant revenue from CalRecycle will be fully expended at the end of Fiscal Year 2024/25.

Summary/Conclusion
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.

Respectfully submitted,
Leilani Ramos
Assistant to the City Manager

City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: April 24, 2023
Subject: Requesting Use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase Licenses for a Virtual-Based Training Platform for Sworn Police Department Personnel Recommended Action
Staff recommends Council approve the use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to purchase 88 licenses for four different virtual-based police training courses, which will provide additional training in Deescalation, Use of Force, and Strategic Communications.

Background
Over the past two years, the Daly City Police Department has hired over 30 new officers, which accounts for approximately half of all officers assigned to the Patrol Division. In addition to our patrol officers' young tenure, there have been and continue to be significant changes to law enforcement practices, to include response to in-progress crimes, required use of de-escalation techniques, and the importance of strategic communication.

Discussion
Performa Labs has developed a virtual-based training platform offering courses in De-Escalation, Advanced De-escalation, Use of Force, and Strategic Communications. These courses are interactive and require officers to engage in the scenarios for better content retention. Additionally, these courses are based on real life scenarios developed via body camera footage from Police Departments around the state. This delivery method provides our sworn staff the ability to experience high liability scenarios and learn best practices for responding to these types of situations. All four of these courses are certified by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. This solution provides an additional training opportunity for staff to complete at their own pace as time permits, freeing up valuable training schedules for mandated training requirements, and other high liability training focused on current events or legislative mandates.

Fiscal Impact
Funding is available using Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds. The one-time purchase for 88 licenses for the four courses is not to exceed $48,000 in asset forfeiture funds.

Summary/Conclusion
Staff is available to provide any additional information requested by the Mayor or Councilmembers.

Respectfully submitted,
Cameron Christensen
Acting Chief of Police

City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: April 24, 2023
Subject: Support the 2023 Daly City Community Based Transportation Plan Recommended Action
It is recommended that the City Council support the 2023 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP), developed by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) with Association of Bay Area Governments/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) grant funding.

Background
MTC initiated the Community-Based Transportation Planning program in 2002 to identify transportation needs in low-income communities throughout the Bay Area. The program’s goal is to improve access and mobility for low-income communities and engage residents and community organizations in identifying local mobility challenges and community-oriented solutions.

The previous CBTP in Daly City was prepared in 2008 and was limited to the Bayshore neighborhood. The 2008 Bayshore CBTP recommended 14 transportation-related projects, programs or plans. By 2019, nine of the 14 recommendations had been implemented or partially implemented.

The completed and partially completed recommendations included improved bicycle facilities installed along Geneva Avenue in 2017, subsidized monthly transit pass program for low-income riders, the Bayshore Shuttle, improvements to transit stops, multi-language transportation marketing, a medical services shuttle, and other miscellaneous improvements.

Discussion
In 2019, C/CAG, as the County’s Congestion Management Agency, obtained funding through an MTC-Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant to prepare an update to the 2008 Bayshore CBTP. The current CBTP was expanded to include three additional Equity Priority Communities (EPC) and renamed as the 2023 Daly City CBTP. The following study areas were included:
• EPC just south of John Daly Boulevard between Lake Merced Boulevard and I-280; • EPC in the Bayshore neighborhood;
• EPC located just east of I-280 and west of Hillside Boulevard and south of School Street; and • EPC north of Highway 1 and east of St. Francis Boulevard.

C/CAG, in partnership with the City of Daly City, San Mateo County, SamTrans, Commute.org, Peninsula Family Services, and Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition., conducted an extensive community outreach plan which included a bilingual community input process composed of a virtual presentation to City Council in February 2021, virtual Transportation Town Hall-style workshop in May 2021, pop-up event at the Bayshore Block Party in October 2021, distribution of electronic and traditional survey and hosting of community feedback events at the Colma BART Station from

Support the 2023 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan Meeting Date: April 24, 2023

October 2020 to February 2022, and pop-up event at the Daly City Farmers’ Market at Serramonte Shopping Center in December 2021.

Based on community input and technical expertise, the project team recommended 14 bicycle, pedestrian and micro mobility projects; 10 transit and paratransit projects; and four safety projects to close mobility gaps for residents of the four EPCs in the 2023 Daly City CBTP study area. The projects identified in the CBTP are eligible for funding through the Lifeline Transportation Program (LTP), which allocates state and federal funds for projects that meet mobility and accessibility needs in low-income communities.

In June 2022, City staff provided revisions to the draft CBTP recommendations. In November 2022, staff provided revisions to the Administrative Draft CBTP. Staff supports the recommendations of the 2023 Daly City CBTP as well as pursuing opportunities to implement project recommendations and tracking the progress of the recommendations for which the City of Daly City is identified as a Responsible Agency.

Fiscal Impact
The 2023 Daly City CBTP was funded through MTC’s Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant Program. No additional funding is needed for the adoption of the Daly City CBTP, but additional funding will be needed to implement some of the projects identified in the plan.

Summary/Conclusion
It is recommended that the City Council support the 2023 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP), developed by C/CAG.

Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Chan Richard Chiu, Jr.

Sr. Civil Engineer Director of Public Works
Attachments:

1. 2023 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan

2. Resolution

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY SUPPORTING THE 2023 DALY CITY COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) initiated the Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) program in 2002 to enhance mobility for residents of historically-disadvantaged Equity Priority Communities (EPC) (formerly Communities of Concern); and
WHEREAS, in 2019, the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), as the County’s Congestion Management Agency, obtained funding through an MTC Community -Based Transportation Planning Grant to prepare an update to the 2008 Bayshore CBTP (now expanded and renamed as the 2023 Daly City CBTP); and WHEREAS, The 2023 Daly City CBTP was led by C/CAG in partnership with the project’s local Advisory Group, comprised of staff members of the City of Daly City, San Mateo County, SamTrans, Commute.org, Peninsula Family Services, Silicon Valley Bicycle Institute and other related stakeholders; and
WHEREAS, The 2023 Daly City CBTP leverages and builds upon an extensive community outreach plan approved by the local Advisory Group and conducted by the C/CAG project team; and
WHEREAS, The 2023 Daly City CBTP project team implemented a bilingual community input process composed of a virtual Transportation Town Hall-style workshop, electronic and traditional survey distribution, coordination with the Daly City City Council and hosting of community feedback events at the Colma BART Station, Bayshore Elementary School and Daly City Farmers’ Market at Serramonte Shopping Center; and WHEREAS, Based on community input and technical expertise, the project team recommended 14 bicycle, pedestrian and micromobility projects; 10 transit and paratransit projects; and four safety projects to close mobility gaps for residents of the four EPCs in the 2023 Daly City CBTP study area; and
WHEREAS, City of Daly City staff provided revisions to the draft CBTP recommendations in June, 2022; and revisions to the Administrative Draft CBTP in November, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City of Daly City supports the recommendations of the Plan and to pursuing future implementation of project recommendations for which the City of Daly City is identified as a Responsible Agency; and
WHEREAS, The City of Daly City agrees to participate in the annual project tracking process outlined in the CBTP; and
WHEREAS, The 2023 Daly City CBTP is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15060(c) and 15378(b); and

WHEREAS, The recommendations identified in the 2023 Daly City CBTP may be considered, evaluated as appropriate under CEQA by the applicable decision-making body at a future time.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Daly City that it does hereby support the recommendations and responsibilities included in the 2023 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan.

I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of Daly City, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2023, by the following vote of the members thereof:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Final Draft | February 2023

Final Draft | February 2023
ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE www.placeworks.com
Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Prepared By:
2040 Bancroft Way
Suite 400
Berkeley, California 94704
t 510.848.3815

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
i
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County List of Figures & Tables ii
Executive Summary3

1. Introduction 13

1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13

1.2 CBTP Guidelines 13

1.3 2008 Bayshore CBTP 14

1.4 Current Daly City CBTP 16

1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 18

2. Study Area Profile 19

2.1 Demographic Analysis 19

2.2 Transportation Patterns 25

2.3 Transportation Network 27

3. Previous and Current Studies 31

3.1 San Mateo County General Plan 31

3.2 Daly City General Plan 31

3.3 Local Transportation and Land Use Plans 32

3.4 Countywide Plans and Studies 34

4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 39

4.1 CBTP Advisory Group 39

4.2 Outreach Process 40

4.3 Digital Survey Results 52

5. Methodology and Recommendations 55

5.1 Evaluation Criteria 55

5.2 Evaluation Process 57

5.3 Recommended Projects and Plans 58

5.4 Evaluation and Monitoring 62
Appendix A Annual CBTP Tracking Checklist
Appendix B Community Needs Assessment
Appendix C Community Outreach Documentation
Table of Contents

ii Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County List of Figures & Tables
Figure ES-1 2008 and Current CBTP Study Areas 4
Table ES-1 Key Findings from Community Outreach Events 7 Table ES-2 Recommended Active Transportation Projects and Plans 10 Table ES-3 Recommended Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans 11 Table ES-4 Recommended Safety Projects and Plans 12
Figure 1-1 2008 Bayshore CBTP Study Area 14
Table 1-1 Status of 2008 Bayshore CBTP Recommendations 15 Figure 1-2 Daly City CBTP Study Area 17
Table 2-1: Race and Ethnicity 19
Figure 2-1 Population Age 65 and Over 20
Figure 2-3 Percent of Population with Physical Disability 21 Figure 2-4 Percent of Population with Sensory Disability 22 Figure 2-5 Limited English Proficiency, CBTP Study Area and San Mateo County 23 Figure 2-6 Population in Poverty 24
Figure 2-7 Household Vehicle Availability in CBTP Study Area 25 Figure 2-8 Household Vehicle Availability Countywide 25 Figure 2-9 Household Vehicle Availability 26
Table 2-2 Means of Travel to Work 27
Figure 2-10 Existing Transit Facilities 28
Figure 2-11 Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network 30
Figure 4-1 Outreach Awareness Flier 42
Figure 4-2 Outreach Awareness Flier (Spanish Version) 42 Figure 4-3 Location of CBTP Outreach Events 45
Figure 4-4 Bayshore Block Party Participation Rates 46
Figure 4-5 Bayshore Block Party Results Summary by Topic 47 Figure 4-6 Serramonte Farmer’s Market Participation Rates 48 Figure 4-7 Serramonte Farmer’s Market Results Summary by Topic 49 Figure 4-8 Colma BART Station Response Tally 50
Figure 4-9 Colma BART Station Results Summary 50
Figure 4-10 Total Participation Rates 51
Figure 4-11 Total Rate of Responses by Topic 52
Figure 4-12 Transit Systems Ridden by Survey Responders 52 Figure 4-13 Impediments to Transit Mobility 53
Figure 4-14 Impediments to Bicycle Mobility 53
Figure 4-15 Impediments to Pedestrian Mobility 53
Figure 4-16 Places that are Hard to Get to Each Way 54
Table 5-1 Recommended Active Transportation Projects and Plans 59 Table 5-2 Recommended Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans 61 Table 5-3 Recommended Safety Projects and Plans 63

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 3
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Executive Summary
This Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) addresses transportation challenges in Equity Priority Communities (EPC) in Daly City. The CBTP was developed by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) with Association of Bay Area Governments/ Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) grant funding. In conformance with MTC guidelines, it represents a collaborative effort between C/CAG, community members, local stakeholders, and transit operators to identify and fill local mobility gaps in EPCs.

The CBTP recommends a series of projects and programs identified during community outreach and review of existing studies. These recommendations were prioritized using evaluation criteria developed with a CBTP Advisory Group (AG).

COVID-19 and CBTP Development
The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shelter-in-place mandate of February/March 2020 occurred following the completion of the initial approved Community Outreach Strategy. As such, the outreach strategy was revisited. Following a meeting of the Advisory Group on August 24, 2020, the CBTP team and MTC approved a new strategy for distanced community outreach and agreed that input related to emerging COVID-19 mobility challenges was relevant to the CBTP and resulting recommendations.

COVID-19 cases peaked from November 2020 to February 2021, again in August 2021, and a third time in January 2022. Each peak required holding or adapting outreach and working with new partners, a process described fully in Chapter 4. As a result, some of the community feedback that influences recommendations in this CBTP are directly tied into the mobility context, habits, priorities, and challenges influenced by COVID-19.

Both C/CAG and MTC determined that it is in the interest of EPCs to adopt this plan in the current context, rather than re-initiate the existing conditions, community outreach, and recommendations processes.

Study Area Profile
Demographic Profile
The last CBTP in Daly City was the 2008 Bayshore CBTP. That study area consisted of a single census tract in the far eastern part of Daly City, north of the City of Brisbane. It had a population of 3,890 people, under four percent of Daly City’s total population at the time. It was a diverse community, at 57 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, 24 percent Hispanic/Latino, 10 percent black and seven percent white.

The current CBTP study area represents a significant expansion from 2008, as shown in Figure ES-1. In addition to the Bayshore tract, it includes three separate EPCs in the northwest, central and southern portions of the city. The total 2017 population of the four EPCs was about 25,500. That population is expected to increase to 31,855 persons by 2040.

The study area remains more diverse than San Mateo County as a whole. About 10 percent of study area residents are white, compared to 40 percent countywide.

Approximately five percent are black, compared to two percent countywide. Thirty percent of the study area population is Hispanic or Latino, and 53 percent is Asian or Pacific Islander.

Approximately 33 percent of all residents in the four EPCs were living in poverty in 2017, as compared to 19 percent Countywide.

Transportation and Transit Profile
The Colma BART Station is located in the southernmost Daly City EPC and Daly City BART Station is located just outside the northern EPC. Together, the stations are served by the Richmond-Millbrae, Antioch-Millbrae, Daly City-Dublin/Pleasanton and Daly City-Warm Springs/South Fremont BART lines. The Bayshore Caltrain station is located at the far northeastern portion of the study area, east of the Bayshore EPC.

The study area is served by several bus routes managed by the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans). Two San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

4 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), 2018; Contra Costa County 2018; Placeworks, 2018.

Figure ES-1 2008 and Current CBTP Study Areas
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Gull Dr
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
Study A
Equity
Daly C
Other J
San Ma
I2 BART S
I2 Caltrain
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City CBTP Study Area

PLACEWORKS
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Gull Dr
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
Study Area
Equity Priority Areas
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions
San Mateo County
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City CBTP Study Area

PLACEWORKS
(MUNI) routes also serve Geneva Avenue in the northeast (Bayshore) EPC and the area immediately surrounding the Daly City BART Station. Additionally, the City of Daly City’s Bayshore Shuttle is routed from the Bayshore neighborhood to the Daly City BART Station.

An active transportation network includes a mix of bicycle and pedestrian facility types that provides some connectivity with transit. Multiple future bicycle and pedestrian projects, including various classes of bike lanes, pedestrian paths and non-automobile safety improvements are proposed in current plans like Walk Bike Daly City: City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan 2020; and the 2021 Unincorporated San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan.

Outreach and Engagement
All CBTP recommendations are based on a community coordination campaign consistent with MTC Guidelines. As detailed in Chapter 4, the outreach process was adapted to changing conditions associated with COVID-19.

Outreach and engagement in this plan included the following components:

1. Oversight by an Advisory Group

2. Project web page

3. Project awareness campaign

4. Bilingual digital transportation survey

5. Meetings with city leadership

6. Virtual “Town Hall” meeting

7. “Pop-up” outreach sessions at events in the study area

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 5
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Advisory group
Initially, C/CAG convened separate AGs for the Daly City CBTP and Southeast San Mateo County CBTP. However, the AGs were combined at the start of the pandemic.

This allowed members to discuss the shared mobility challenges of COVID-19 alongside new outreach strategies. The AG also continued to perform its role of reviewing project milestones, providing direction on reaching specific communities, and prioritizing CBTP recommendations.

The AG was composed of Daly City, San Mateo County, and transit agency staff as well as representatives from transportation-related non-profit organizations. All members are listed in Chapter 4.

Project Web Page
The CBTP team developed a project web page on the C/CAG website. The web page included background information on the CBTP process, project submittals such as the Community Needs Assessment and AG meeting presentations. Links to Spanish and English versions of the online transportation survey were also uploaded to the webpage.

Awareness Campaign
The CBTP team developed a graphics-rich Outreach Awareness Notice in English (see Figure 4-1) and Spanish (see Figure 4-2) to notice the public of outreach events in various EPCs. The flier was adapted to each event and posted digitally on websites of stakeholders involved in the project.

Transportation Survey
A bilingual on-line survey was released in late 2020. It was designed to assess rates of active transportation and transit use, identify barriers to those options, and highlight community resources (hospitals, supermarkets, etc.) that are difficult to access. The survey also included questions about mobility challenges associated with shelter-inplace restrictions and changing work conditions due to COVID-19. The digital survey was made available on the C/CAG project webpage, Jefferson Union High School District webpage, and various jurisdictions in English and Spanish.

6 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County City Council Outreach
Equitable and effective outreach was difficult in the first half of 2021 due to COVID-19 surges. Members of the AG and community leaders expressed concern that many residents of EPCs would not be adequately represented in the CBTP engagement process. As a result, the CBTP team coordinated directly with City staff and leadership to review the current outreach effort and brainstorm new outreach strategies.

On February 22, 2021, the CBTP team facilitated a virtual presentation to the Daly City City Council to solicit ideas for penetrating EPCs and increasing community participation. City Council members shared ideas for potential new events, target communities, and local partners.

On May 17, 2021, the project team presented to the entire Daly City community at a “Local Transportation Challenges Virtual Town Hall” meeting hosted by the City. A graphic notice of the meeting in English, Spanish, Mandarin and Tagalog was placed in the Daly City Spring 2021 Newsletter and the event was introduced by San Mateo County Supervisor David J. Canepa. Low community turn-out to the event was a further indication of the ongoing challenge of community outreach in the first half of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pop-Up Sessions
Late 2021 saw increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates and relaxation of shelter-inplace mandates. At this time, the CBTP team utilized previous input from AG members, City leaders and community surveys to schedule “Pop-Up” outreach sessions at pre-scheduled events in and near Daly City EPCs. The goals of these events were to collect detailed feedback about transportation challenges directly from EPC residents. CBTP project staff facilitated “map and dot” study board exercises, on-site surveys, and “infrastructure gap” sticker exercises to allow participants to visually identify existing mobility gaps.

Pop-up sessions were conducted at the following events with the following participation rates:

1. 2nd Annual Bayshore Block Party hosted by the Bayshore Parent Teach Organization (PTO) of Bayshore Elementary School on October 16, 2021.

Approximately 47 attendees participated in interactive exercises, comment cards and surveys.

2. Serramonte Farmer’s Market, on December 4, 2021. CBTP project staff facilitated a pop-up event at the market from 8:30 am to 12:00 pm. Nineteen people participated in mapping exercises and 22 people contributed narrative comments.

3. Colma BART Station on February 8th, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm. Team members set up maps and information in the station’s covered “Free Speech Area.” CBTP team members facilitated map exercises and/or discussions with eight BART riders and collected 12 comment cards.

Key Findings
Table ES-1 summarizes the key findings and feedback from each outreach component.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 7
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Transportation
Survey
(Note:
responders
could select
multiple
options)
Transit system ridden (descending order):

1. BART (68%)

2. SamTrans (49%)

3. Caltrain (12%)
Impediments to transit (descending order):

1. Route design (54%)

2. Delays and unpredictability (49%)

3. Hours of operation (44%)

4. Location of stops (34%)

5. Condition of shelters (34%)
Impediments to biking (descending order):

1. Dangerous streets or intersections (46%)

2. Lack of bike lanes (41%)

3. Lack of secure bike parking (29%)

4. Gaps in existing lanes (22%)
Impediments to walking (descending order):

1. Poor lighting (56%)

2. Poor sidewalks (49%)

3. Difficult intersections (46%)
Places that are hard to get to (descending order):

1. Supermarket (34%)

2. Transit station (34%)

3. Hospital/medical center (29%)

4. Work (24%)

5. School (15%)
New COVID-19-related transportation challenges
(descending order):

1. I feel unsafe on transit (44%)

2. Reduced transit schedules (29%)

3. None (22%)

4. Other (12%)
Bayshore
Block Party
“Pop-Up”
Bicycle Challenges:
● General lack of bike lanes, gaps in existing lanes, and unsafe intersections
● Need for “dedicated” bike lanes in Bayshore
● Improved lighting and markings along Geneva Avenue bike lane
Pedestrian Challenges:
● The need for a more pedestrian-safe Geneva Avenue, with more and safer crossing opportunities
● Need to repave sidewalks in Bayshore
● Lack of crosswalks on long blocks
● Dangerous pedestrian access conditions at Bayshore
Elementary School
Transit Challenges:
● Lack of Transit Access to other Daly City schools (more than six comments)
● Lack of frequency to San Francisco (in particular Balboa BART Station)
● Shuttle for seniors to shopping centers
● Lack of frequency of the Daly City Bayshore Shuttle
● Better bus/transit materials in Cantonese
Safety Challenges
● Racecar community associated with Cow Palace
● Loud cars in and around Cow Palace
● Ottilia Street, Partridge Street, and Accacia Street are “racetracks” where cars do sideshows and donuts
Table ES-1 Key Findings from Community Outreach Events

8 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Serramonte
Farmer’s
Market
“Pop-Up”
Bicycle Challenges:
● General “behind the curve” conditions of bike facilities and resulting difficulty of bike access around Serramonte Mall Pedestrian Challenges:
● Dangerous conditions at intersection of Cerro Drive and Southgate Avenue
● Need for better sidewalks along Serramonte Boulevard and Junipero Serra Boulevard
● Need to repair “prepare to stop” signals on Westridge and Westmoor Avenues that are commonly out of service
Transit Challenges:
● Need for “bus linkage” between Serramonte Mall and other retail destinations in Daly City
● Lack of frequency of bus routes, especially SamTrans’ 110 and 120
● Need for a dedicated shuttle for seniors to shopping centers ● Preparation of bus/transit marketing and information materials in Cantonese
● Poor conditions of SamTrans Route 110 bus stops near Ranch 99 Market (250 Skyline Plaza)
● Lack of transit access for Belcrest neighborhood at Belcrest Avenue and Longview Drive
Safety Challenges
● Unsafe conditions due to traffic bottlenecks at multiple Serramonte Mall destinations, including and vehicle speeds on and around:
» Target
» Chick-fil-A
» In-N-Out Burger
» The Home Depot
● Unsafe conditions due to traffic bottlenecks on:
» Callan Boulevard
Serramonte
Farmer’s
Market
“Pop-Up”
(Continued)
» Serramonte Boulevard
» Saint Francis Boulevard
» Gellert Boulevard
● Lack of adequate lighting in and around:
» Residential areas west of Saint Francis Boulevard and south of Highway 35/Route 1 intersection
» Ranch 99 Market
● Illegal dumping that contributes to sense of danger
Colma BART
Station
“Pop-Up”
Bicycle Challenges:
● Need for bike lanes to and around the BART station
● Lack of protected bike lanes around Colma BART station and in Daly City as a whole
Pedestrian Challenges:
● Intersection at Mission Road/San Pedro Road/Market Street is complex and confusing
Transit Challenges:
● Lack of shelters on SamTrans Route 130 around the station ● The need for shorter commute hour headways on SamTrans Route 120
● New development projects in Daly City that will increase SamTrans ridership and need for increased BART route
frequencies
● Insufficient transit connection from Colma BART to Serramonte Mall
Safety Challenges
● Colma Station can feel dirty and not well-maintained
● Bus bays at Colma are unsafe or poorly-lit at night
Table ES-1 Key Findings from Community Outreach Events (Continued)

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 9
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Recommendations Methodology
Evaluation Criteria
As detailed in Chapter 5, the CBTP project team worked with the AG to establish four evaluation criteria to rank projects and programs by their ability to improve mobility for challenged communities:

1. Reflects Community Priorities

2. Increases Access

3. Is Financially Feasible

4. Ease of Implementation
Scoring Methodology
Recommendations were scored one through five for each evaluation criteria. A score of one reflects the lowest potential for fulfillment of that category; five the highest.

For all project and plans, the following score averages were calculated:
■ Average Score: The average score of Criteria 1 through 4. ■ Area Need Score: The average score of Criterion 1 (Community Priorities) and Criterion 2 (Increases Access).
■ Project Potential Score: The average score of Criterion 3 (Financial Feasibility) and Criterion 4 (Ease of Implementation).

The CBTP team consolidated criteria into the two scores above to improve the likelihood that CBTP projects will be implemented. A focus on recommendations with the highest and/or most immediate potential to get funded and built will support the grant selection and planning. It will facilitate more informed decision-making and awareness of potential challenges for future projects.

Implementation TimeFrame
Each of the following recommendations is assigned one the following three implementation timeframes based on community priority:

1. Short Term (ST). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in one to three years.

2. Medium Term (MT). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in three to eight years.

3. Long Term (LT). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in eight or more years.

Project Types
Recommendations fall within the following groups of projects and plans:

Active Transportation. These are generally capital improvements that increase safe, healthy, active transportation choices, namely walking and biking, for everyday trips.

Active transportation also includes micromobility, which refers to the use of individual, lightweight vehicles, such as bikeshares and e-scooters, typically on a per-ride basis.

Transit and Paratransit. Transit projects may include new routes, expanding operating hours of certain lines, increasing transit line frequency, or improving transit stops with lighting, shelter, and seating.

Safety. School safety projects provide safe, non-motorized routes between where people live and local schools. Examples of safety projects include improvements to school access and student safety, traffic calming on streets with high rates of pedestrians, neighborhood lighting improvements and poorly-secured transit facilities.

Recommendations
The following tables summarize recommended projects and plans, including estimated cost, timeframe and responsible agency(ies) for the three project types. All recommendations are listed in descending order of average score.

Active Transportation Projects and Plans
Table ES-2 lists recommended Daly City CBTP active transportation projects.

Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans
Table ES-3 lists recommended Daly City CBTP transit and paratransit projects and Safety Projects and Plans
Table ES-4 lists recommended Daly City CBTP safety projects.

Table ES-2 Recommended Active Transportation Projects and Plans Recommendation Average
Score
Area
Need
Score
Project
Potential
Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Study potential alternatives for high-visibility crosswalks at the intersection of Serramonte Boulevard and Highway 1 ramps. 4.25 4.5 4 $30,000 ST Daly City
Improve Daly City BART Station access for pedestrians travelling eastbound on John Daly Boulevard with improved markings, signalization and directional signage at the intersection of John Daly Boulevard and Niantic Avenue, consistent with 2020 City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 4 4.5 3.5 $1M ST Daly City
and BART
Create a more pedestrian-safe Geneva Avenue: Install crosswalks with curb extensions at Allan St and Talbert Street 3.75 4 3.5 $65,000 ST Daly City Install Class IV bikeway on State Route 82 in unincorporated Colma, per Unincorporated San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan. 3.5 5 2 $8M to $24M MT San Mateo County Install signage and pavement markings to better designate existing Class II bike lanes on Geneva Avenue between Santos Street and Bayshore Boulevard. 3.5 3 4 $35,000 ST Daly City Improve the intersection of Mission Street / E. Market Street / San Pedro Road with a pedestrian island and high-visibility or "3D" crosswalks. 3.5 3.5 3.5 $38,000 ST Caltrans/ Daly City Study bicycle and pedestrian network conditions and conflicts within ½ mile of the Daly City and Colma BART Stations. Include recommendations for active transportation network improvements, infrastructure projects and micromobility programs designed to increase bike/ped safety and close “first-mile-last-mile” gaps.

3.5 4 3 $275,000 ST

C/CAG, SMC
Transportation Agency
Perform a feasibility study of a ped/bike pathway from the terminus of Reiner Street in unincorporated Colma to the Colma BART station, on unimproved land beyond the soundwall adjacent to the Station. 3.5 4 3 $275,000 ST San Mateo
County, Daly
City, BART
Develop a micromobility implementation guidebook for local jurisdictions to support efficient roll-out of bikeshare, e-scooter and other micromobility programs. The guidebook should include a framework for:
• Engaging community members to get input on preferred micromobility programs. • Identifying type(s) of micromobility program(s) for maximum community benefit. • Locating micromobility vehicle access and parking areas. • Designing safe and accessible micromobility routes that close “first-mile-last-mile” transit gaps. • Contracting with third party vendors.

3.5 3.5 3.5 $325,000 ST C/CAG
Improve access to electronic bikes via equity programs for both shared e-bikes and individually owned e-bikes. 3.5 3.5 3.5 $50,000 to $500,000 MT
C/CAG, San
Mateo County
Daly City
Study the repurposing of Hillside Boulevard in Unincorporated Colma into a Class IV bikeway. 3.25 3.5 3 $275,000 MT San Mateo County
Increase number of bike lockers at Colma BART station from eight to 20, consistent with Daly City BART Station. 3.25 2.5 4 $30,000 LT BART Study the development of a Class IV bikeway (per Unincorporated San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan) and series of safer pedestrian crossings on Hillside Blvd. in Unincorporated Colma 3.25 2.5 4 $75,000 LT San Mateo
County, Daly
City
Install Class III bike route on Mission Street from Westake Avenue to San Pedro Road, per 2020 City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 3 3.5 2.5 $1.2M LT Caltrans

Table ES-3 Recommended Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans Recommendation Average
Score
Area Need
Score
Project
Potential
Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Broaden multi-lingual information and awareness campaign of Clipper START program to include transit stops, stations and high-activity destinations in Equity Priority Communities. 4.25 3.5 5 $75,000 ST MTC Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 110 bus stop at Southgate Ave and Westmoor Avenue, near Ranch 99 Market at 250 Skyline Plaza, Daly City, CA 94015
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 122 bus stop at Callan Street and King Drive, near Manilla Oriental Market at 950 King Drive Suite 112, Daly City, CA 94015
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 130 bus stops on Hillsdale Boulevard between Gambetta Street and Bismark Street, near Mission Plaza at 6843 Mission St, Daly City, CA 94014
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route ECR bus stops at Mission Street/Eastlake Avenue and Mission Street/Parkview Avenue, near MidCity Market at 6718 Mission St, Daly City, CA 94014 4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Implement a 2022 San Mateo County Paratransit Rider’s Guide "How-to Tour." Introduce tour-goers at senior centers, medical facilities and social service organizations to the basics of paratransit eligibility, sign-up, routing and ride process.

3.75 4 3 $70,000 to
$120,000 MT
San Mateo
County,
SamTrans,
Daly City
Develop implementation strategies for equity mobility programs that encourage mode shift, such as the 2021 101 Express Lanes Community Benefits Program. 3.75 4 3 $20,000 to $35,000 MT C/CAG,
San Mateo
County, Daly
City
Increase the frequency of the City of Daly City’s Bayshore Shuttle to include limited weekend service. 3.75 5 2.5 $600,000
to $1M
annually
MT Daly City
Install NACTO and ADA compliant bus stops along SamTrans Route 130. 3.75 3 4.5 $20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
MT SamTrans
Program a new Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy SamTrans route connecting Bayshore and Serramonte. 3.5 4 2.5 $1.5M
to $3M
start-up
LT SamTrans

12 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Table ES-4 Recommended Safety Projects and Plans
Recommendation Average
Score
Area
Need Score
Project
Potential Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Install curb extensions at intersections on community-identified informal “racetracks” on the following Bayshore neighborhood rights-of-way:
● Entire length of Ottilia Street
● Entire length of Partridge Street
● Accacia Street from Geneva Avenue to Bay Ridge Drive

4.25 4.5 4 $1.5M to $2M ST Daly City
Implement Safe Routes to School infrastructure, including traffic calming techniques such as lane narrowing, bulb-outs, and rapid flashing beacons at:
● Bayshore Elementary School
● Thornton High School
● Daniel Webster Elementary
● Westlake Elementary School
● Jefferson High School

3.75 4 3.5
$300,000 to
$600,000 per
school
ST
Daly City,
Bayshore
Elementary
Unified School
District,
Jefferson
Elementary
School District,
Jefferson Union
High School
District
Execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
Daly City leadership and Cow Palace Board of Directors (State of California Department of Food and Agriculture’s division of Fairs and Expositions) to develop a community-sensitive event scheduling and safety campaign.

3.25 3.5 3 $15,000 MT Daly City, State
of California
Improve lighting at loading areas, bus bays and areas between the station footprint and loading area and bus bays, at Colma BART Station.
3 2.5 3.5 $400,000 to
$700,000 MT BART

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 13
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

1. Introduction

1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program In 2001, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) published two reports identifying gaps in the provision of transportation services in low-income Bay Area neighborhoods and initiated two programs to allocate funding for transportation improvement projects based on outreach to low-income communities. The Lifeline Transportation Program (LTP) allocates state and federal funds to provide grants for projects that meet mobility and accessibility needs in low-income communities. The Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Program is an outreach-based program to improve travel needs in specific low-income Equity Priority Communities (EPC) throughout the Bay Area. Each CBTP is a collaborative effort between community members, transit operators, local jurisdictions and congestion management agencies to identify local mobility challenges and community-oriented solutions.

The projects identified in CBTPs then become eligible for funding through the LTP. The goal of the LTP is to fund projects that result in improved mobility and accessibility for low-income residents of the San Francisco Bay Area. Eligible projects must:
■ Be developed through an inclusive planning process that engages a broad range of stakeholders;
■ Improve a range of transportation choices by adding new or expanded services; ■ Address transportation gaps and/or barriers identified in a CBTP.

Both operating projects and capital projects are eligible for funding under the LTP.

LTP Cycle 6, which covers Fiscal Year 2018–2019 through Fiscal Year 2019–2020 was funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Funds.

MTC distributes a portion of State Transit Assistance (STA) population-based funds STA to CMAs, each of which is tasked with establishing policies to distribute STA Block Grant funds within its jurisdiction. San Mateo County has proposed to allocate 40 percent of funds to SamTrans’ paratransit program and 60 percent to C/CAG for the county-led Lifeline Program.

1.2 CBTP Guidelines
MTC has established guidelines to ensure that CBTP mobility recommendations are the result of community input. Per the 2018 MTC guidelines:
■ All CBTP recommendations must be based on a Community Engagement Plan that includes at least three best practices for outreach to low-income residents. ■ Community outreach must be coordinated with community stakeholders, such as Community Based Organizations (CBO) and non-profits working with the underserved.
■ Each CBTP must convene a Steering Committee composed of social service, CBO, agency, and/or non-profit leadership to review outreach strategies, recommendation selection criteria, and milestones. ■ Each CBTP must identify funding sources for “high-priority” projects.

1.2.1 Equity Priority Communites
As noted in Section 1.1, CBTP study areas are composed of MTC-identified EPCs.

These are census tract-based geographies that exhibit either: 1

1. A low-income population (<200-percent federal poverty level) that exceeds 30 percent and a minority population that exceeds 70 percent; or 1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2021 (modified May 14),”Equity Priority Communities,”mtc.ca.gov. https://mtc. ca.gov/planning/transportation/access-equity-mobility/equity-priority-communities.

14 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

2. A low-income population that exceeds 30 percent and a population that surpasses MTC thresholds for at least three of the following:
■ Limited English Proficiency (12 percent threshold)
■ Seniors 75 Years and Over (15 percent threshold)
■ Zero-Vehicle Households (15 percent threshold)
■ Single Parent Families (18 percent threshold)
■ People with a Disability (12 percent threshold)
■ Rent-Burdened Households (14 percent threshold)

1.3 2008 Bayshore CBTP
The 2008 Daly City CBTP study area was limited to a single census tract in the Bayshore neighborhood of northeast Daly City. It was identified in MTC’s 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The 2008 Bayshore CBTP study area consisted of 3,890 people, which at the time, was 3.75 percent of Daly City’s total population. The northern boundary of the study area shared the northern boundary of San Mateo County line, as shown in Figure 1-1. Significant changes in demographics, land use and transportation options have occurred since the adoption of the 2008 Bayshore CBTP, resulting in additional EPAs and revised CBTP study area.

The 2008 Bayshore CBTP recommended 14 transportation related projects, programs, or plans. By 2019, two of the 14 recommendations had been successfully implemented, six recommendations partially implemented, and six not been implemented. The completed projects include improved bicycle facilities installed along Geneva street in 2017 and subsidized monthly transit pass program for low-income riders. Some of the partially implemented recommendations include the Bayshore shuttle, improvements to transit stops, multi-language transportation marketing and a medical services shuttle. More information on the implementation status of the 2008 Bayshore CBTP Recommendations are found here in Table 1-1.

Most of the barriers to implementation of these recommendations involve a lack of funding mechanisms such as unidentified funding or Responsible Agency to research funding. When the implementation of a program or policy relies on coordination across multiple jurisdictions or agencies, the complex planning and communication needed to implement the program or policy becomes a constraint for program or policy success.

Figure 1-1 2008 Bayshore CBTP Study Area

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 15
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Table 1-1 Status of 2008 Bayshore CBTP Recommendations
Recommended Project/Plan/
Program
Level of Implementation
Notes
Fully Partially Not
Implemented
Short-Term
Provide Circulator Shuttle X Hindered by multi-agency coordination, subsidy restrictions, driver shortages Provide Discounted Taxi Rides to Medical
Facilities X Hindered by private partnerships, lack of funding source, complex reimbursement and discount mechanism needs development, increasing preference towards TNCs
Subsidize School Bus Service X Hindered by school transfers as barrier to entry, no responsible party identified for funding source identification Improve Taxi Service Information X Telephone area codes were not addressed in actions, plan hindered increasing preference towards TNCs Increase Public Awareness about
Transportation Options X Printed materials now obsolete with smartphone availability, strategy redundant with other awareness programs Short- to Mid-Term
Improve Transit Stops – SamTrans X Hindered by multi-agency coordination, lack of funding source Improve Transit Stops – MUNI X Hindered by limiting site conditions, permitting, public acceptance, shifts in routes Improve Bicycle Infrastructure X Bike facilities installed along Geneva Ave in 2017 Provide Transit Information in Different
Languages X Printed materials obsolete with online resources and smartphone availability Subsidize Monthly Transit Passes for Low
Income Riders X Transit Fare Assistance program (CalWORKS) included in County Welfare to Work Transportation Plan Mid-Term
Provide Shuttle Service to Kaiser Medical
Offices X Hindered by lack TDM Strategy to plan, fund, and implement service Enhance Pedestrian Safety X Installed bulb-outs on Geneva Ave. and flashing beacons at Geneva Ave. and Oriente St.

Improve Affordability of Transfers between
Transit Systems X Hindered by development of equitable revenue exchange mechanism Long-Term
Provide Fixed-Route Service X Service provided by SamTrans Circulator Shuttle, which has many of the same stop TOTAL 2 6 6

16 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

1.4 Current Daly City CBTP

1.4.1 Study Area
The current Daly City CBTP study area (study area) is delineated by the red dashed line in Figure 1-2. The study area was determined by the location of four separate EPCs distributed across Daly City, including:
■ Northwest EPC. This EPC is located just south of John Daly Boulevard, at the intersection of Interstate 280. It partially surrounds the Lake Merced Golf Club to the north and west.
■ Northeast EPC. This census tract is in the Bayshore neighborhood of Daly City. It comprised the 2008 Bayshore CBTP study area. It is in the eastern portion of the City and, as shown in Figure 2, shares its northern boundary with San Francisco County.
■ Central EPC. This tract is located immediately east of Interstate 280. Mission Street and East Market Street intersect here, and the Colma BART Station is located here. This is the only EPC that includes an unincorporated area of San Mateo County.
■ Southern EPC. As evident in Figure 2, this tract includes the area North of Hwy 1 and east of St. Francis Boulevard, as well as a larger area southeast of the intersection of Hwy 1 and Skyline Boulevard/SR 35.

1.4.2 CBTP Advisory Group
Per MTC’s CBTP Guidelines, C/CAG convened two Advisory Groups (AG), one to guide the Daly City CBTP and one to guide the concurrent Southeast San Mateo County CBTP. The AGs consisted of representatives from CBOs, non-profits, local jurisdictions, transit agencies, and MTC. The role of the AGs was to ensure transparency and inclusivity throughout the process, review project milestones, and assist in program evaluation. The AGs provided input on reaching specific members of the community, prioritized outreach opportunities, and evaluated the list of policy and project recommendations for the study area.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 17
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 1-2 Daly City CBTP Study Area
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Gull Dr
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
Study Area
Equity Priority Communities
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions San
Mateo County
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City CBTP Study Area

PLACEWORKS
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Gull Dr
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
Study Area
Equity Priority Communities
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions San
Mateo County
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City CBTP Study Area

PLACEWORKS
Source: Metropolitan
Transportation Commission,
2018; PlaceWorks 2019.

18 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Due to challenges of coordinating two Advisory Groups at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the CBTP team decided to combine the Daly City and Southeast San Mateo AGs into a single AG. The AG met four times throughout the outreach process (one in-person, three virtual) to provide practical guidance on local input, reach specific segments of the community, review deliverables, and provide input on project review criteria and CBTP draft recommendations. See Chapter 4 for a complete list of all AG members. AG members also and participated in review of final CBTP recommendations.

1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development
The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shelter-in-place mandate of March 2020 occurred just after the CBTP Community Needs Assessment background report and Community Outreach Strategy were completed. As such, outreach implementation was temporarily halted and revisited. On August 24, 2020 the AG and MTC approved a new strategy for distanced community outreach and agreed that input related to emerging COVID-19 mobility challenges was relevant to the CBTP and resulting recommendations.

COVID-19 cases peaked from November 2020 to February 2021, again in August 2021, and a third time in January 2022. Each peak required delaying or adapting outreach and working with new partners, a process described fully in Chapter 4.

As a result, some of the community feedback that influences recommendations in this CBTP is directly tied into the mobility context, habits, priorities, and challenges influenced by COVID-19.

The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), with MTC, determined that it is in the interest of communities in the CBTP study area to adopt this plan in the current context, rather than re-initiate the existing conditions, community outreach, and recommendations processes.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 19
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

2. Study Area Profile
2013–2017 ACS 5-year estimates, 10 percent of study area residents were White, compared to 40 percent countywide. The Black population is approximately five percent, compared to two percent countywide. 30 percent of the study area population is Latinx compared to approximately 25 percent in the County.

The current Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) study area is composed of four separate census tracts dispersed across the City. This contributes to a diverse demographic and land use profile.

A full CBTP Study Area Community Needs Assessment report is provided in Appendix A.

2.1 Demographic Analysis
This demographic profile compares census tract data from previous and current U.S. Census and American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2006-2010 and 2013-2017) to show trends since the last CBTP. In addition, future projections are provided from the 2017 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which MTC published in July 2017. Also known as Plan Bay Area (PBA) 2040, this RTP contains forecasts for population, housing, and employment for the horizon year of 2040. For purposes of this analysis, data shown for the study area is limited to the census tracts that make up the four EPCs.

2.1.1 Population
According to the 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates, the population of the study area in 2017 was approximately 25,533, having grown eight percent from 2010, when the population was 23,653. This growth rate is similar to growth experienced over the past seven years in San Mateo County overall, where the population grew about nine percent during the same time period, from 704,327 to 767,450 residents. The population of the study area is predicted to increase 25 percent through 2040, to 31,855 residents. This is slightly higher than the county, which is expected to grow by 19 percent from 2017 to 2040, to a population of 916,590.

2.1.2 Race and Ethnicity
The study area contains higher percentages of Asian, Latinx, and Black residents compared than San Mateo County, while having approximately a quarter of the percentage of White residents compared to the County (Table 2-1). According to Table 2-1: Race and Ethnicity
Race Category
2017 ACS % of Population
Study Area San Mateo County
White 10% 40%
Black or African American 5% 2%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0% <1%
Asian 51% 27%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2% 1%
Other <1% <1%
Two or More Races 2% 4%
Hispanic or Latinx 30% 25%
Total 100% 100%
Source: US Census 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.

2.1.3 Age Distribution
According to 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates and shown in Figure 2-1, the senior population (65 years of age and older) in the study area is at least 11 percent of the area’s total population in all four separate EPCs. The northeast and southern EPCs both have a higher percentage of seniors, constituting between 13 to 18 percent of the area’s total population. The study area-wide rate of seniors is significantly lower than that of San Mateo County, where 15 percent of the total population is 65 and older.

20 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-1 Population Age 65 and Over
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population Age 65 Years and Over
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of Seniors (65 or Older)
Per Census Tract
11% - 12%
13% - 18%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population Age 65 Years and Over
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of Seniors (65 or Older)
Per Census Tract
11% - 12%
13% - 18%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 21
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-3 Percent of Population with Physical Disability I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Physical Disabilities
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of People with Physical
Disabilities
Per Census Tract

6.1% - 7%

8.1% - 9%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Physical Disabilities
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of People with Physical
Disabilities
Per Census Tract

6.1% - 7%

8.1% - 9%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

22 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-4 Percent of Population with Sensory Disability I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Sensory Disability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of People with Sensory
Disabilities (Hearing and Visual)
Per Census Tract

2.1% - 3%

3.1% - 4%

4.1% - 5%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Sensory Disability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of People with Sensory
Disabilities (Hearing and Visual)
Per Census Tract

2.1% - 3%

3.1% - 4%

4.1% - 5%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 23
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County The average population of residents under 18 years of age across the four EPCs is about 20 percent. As shown in Figure 2-2, the EPCs have varying rates of young people. The central EPC, containing the Colma BART station, has the highest percentage of youth with approximately 25 to 28 percent of the population under 18 years of age. In comparison, the EPC located in the northwest portion of the study area, adjacent Lake Merced Golf Club, has a youth population of about half that, comprising approximately 11 to 16 percent of the total population. The other two EPCs have relatively moderate populations under 18 years of age, each with approximately 17 to 20 percent youth. The average rate of young people in the CBTP study area is close to that of San Mateo County, where 21 percent of the total population is under 18 years old.

2.1.4 Disability
Percent disabled population is one of seven tract-level variables that, when paired with a high rate of low-income households, may factor into the establishment of an EPC, per MTC guidelines. The U.S. Census separates disability type into sensory (hearing- and sight-impaired) and physical disabilities. Both are considered significant barriers to mobility.

As shown in Figure 2-3, the rate of individuals with physical disabilities is largely consistent across the study area. In three of the four EPCs, about eight to nine percent of individuals are restricted by a physical disability. That number is slightly less in the southern census tract, where the rate is six to seven percent.

The rate of physical disabilities countywide is about five percent.

As shown in Figure 2-4, rates of hearing or visually impaired individuals in the Daly City study area are relatively low. These rates are concentrated in the central and northeast EPCs, at about four to five percent of the population. This is similar to rates countywide. The southern EPC has the lowest rate of sensory disabilities, at approximately two to three percent.

2.1.5 Language and English Proficiency
On average, the four census tracts in the Daly City CBTP study area exhibit double the rate of limited English proficiency than the countywide population. As shown in Figure 2-5, approximately 18 percent of total households in the study area are designated as “Limited English-Speaking Households”, or households in which all members 14 years and over speak a non-English language, with varying degrees of English fluency. This is compared to the countywide rate of nine percent of total households.

The rate of non-English speaking households is higher than the countywide rate in all four EPCs in the study area. However, the northeastern and southern EPCs have higher incidences of non-English speaking households than the other two EPCs, at 23 percent and 19 percent, respectively.

Source: 2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates (2013-2017).
20%
0%
2%
CBTP Area San Mateo County
4%
6%
12%
8%
14%
10%
16%
18%
Figure 2-5 Limited English Proficiency, CBTP Study Area and San Mateo County
18%
9%

24 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-6 Population in Poverty
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty Level)
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percent Population with Income Below
200 Percent of Poverty Level
Per Census Tract
25% - 30%
31% - 35%
36% - 45%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty Level)
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percent Population with Income Below
200 Percent of Poverty Level
Per Census Tract
25% - 30%
31% - 35%
36% - 45%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 25
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

2.1.6 Poverty Status
The U.S. Census Bureau uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine the population living in poverty. To reflect high living costs and wages in the Bay Area, the poverty threshold used in the CBTP analysis is 200 percent of the federal poverty threshold. These 200 percent thresholds for the 2013- 2017 ACS 5-year estimates range from $31,754 for a family of two to $101,362 for the largest families (nine people or more).

According to 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates, approximately 33 percent of all residents in the four EPCs were living in poverty. This figure is significant when compared to San Mateo County as a whole, where 19 percent of residents live in poverty. Figure 2-6 shows the percent of population in poverty for each census tract area in the study area, based on the 200 percent of federal poverty threshold. The northeast EPC has the highest percentage, with approximately 36 to 45 percent of residents living in poverty. Both the central and southern EPCs have between 31 to 35 percent of residents living in poverty, while the northeastern EPC has the lowest incidence, with impoverished residents comprising 25 to 30 percent of the population.

2.2 Transportation Patterns
The following sections describe current transportation and commute patterns in the CBTP study area and countywide.

2.2.1 Vehicle Availability
Rates of household car ownership in Daly City EPCs are significantly less than in San Mateo County as a whole. As illustrated in Figures 2-7 and 2-8, four times the number of households in the study area, as compared to the county, are without a private vehicle. The percentage of households with two vehicles is also lower, at 60 percent compared to 79 percent countywide. In addition, there are far more households with just one vehicle in the study area than there are in the county.

Figure 2-9 shows the percentage of households with no vehicle by census tract for the study area. The northwest and central EPCs have some of the highest concentrations of households without vehicles. The northeast EPC has the lowest percentage of households with no vehicles, between three and five percent. This is similar to countywide vehicle availability.

Figure 2-7 Household Vehicle Availability in CBTP Study Area Figure 2-8 Household Vehicle Availability Countywide

26 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-9 Household Vehicle Availability
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Household Vehicle Availability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of Households with No
Vehicles
Per Census Tract
3% - 5%
6% - 8%
9% - 11%
12% - 29%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Household Vehicle Availability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Percentage of Households with No
Vehicles
Per Census Tract
3% - 5%
6% - 8%
9% - 11%
12% - 29%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 27
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

2.2.2 Journey to Work
Approximately 69 percent workers aged 16 years and over in the study area travel to work by car, truck, or van. More than three-quarters of these workers drive alone (Table 2-2). Using a vehicle as the primary means of transportation to work is less prevalent in the study area than countywide, in which 79 percent of workers primarily use a personal vehicle.

The northwest EPC has the highest number of residents commuting without a car, with approximately 30 percent taking public transit and nine percent walking. The southern and northeast EPCs have the lowest rate of public transportation use (about 18 percent each), but the southern EPC has a slightly higher incidence of walking and working from home than the eastern EPC.

Table 2-2 Means of Travel to Work
Means of Transportation to Work
2017 ACS (% of Total)
Study Area San Mateo
County
Car, Truck or Van 69% 79%
• Drove Alone 56% 69%
• Carpooled 13% 10%
Public Transportation 23% 10%
Bicycle <1% 1%
Walk 4% 3%
Other 2% 1%
Worked at Home 2% 5%
Total Workers 16 and Over 100% 100%
Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5year estimates.

2.2.3 Long-distance Commute
Commuters in the Daly City CBTP study area do not typically commute more than 30 minutes each way, which is is close to the countywide average of 28.2 minutes.

Three of the four EPCs have an average commute time between 28 and 32 minutes.

The southwest tract has a slightly lower average commute time, ranging from 25 to 27 minutes to work.

2.3 Transportation Network
The following sections describe existing mobility services and infrastructure in the study area and summarizes gaps in the transportation network, as identified in relevant countywide and local plans.

There are multiple transit options in the Daly City study area. The area is served by bus and rail systems managed by numerous agencies. Some transit options serve Daly City EPCs directly, others serve the larger CBTP study area.

2.3.1 Transit Network
The existing transportation network in the Daly City CBTP study area is illustrated in Figure 2-10.

Rail
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) serves the study area via the Richmond-Millbrae, Antioch-Millbrae, Daly City-Dublin/Pleasanton and Daly City-Warm Springs/South Fremont lines. As shown in Figure 2-10, the Daly City BART Station is located just south of the San Francisco County line and the Colma BART Station is located within the central EPC.

The Bayshore Caltrain station is located at the far northeastern portion of the study area, east of the Bayshore EPC. Caltrain provides regional connectivity from Downtown San Francisco, through San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to the City of Gilroy.

Bus
As shown on Figure 2-10 the study area is served by several bus routes managed by the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans). Figure 2-10 includes recent SamPage 50 of 1462 28 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-10 Existing Transit Facilities
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æ
%&'(280
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station

PLACEWORKS
I2
I2
Study Area
E
Communites
quity Priority
Bus Stops
BART Stations
Caltrain Stations
BART
Caltrain
SamTrans Routes
SF Municipal
Transportation Agency
Daly City
Bayshore Shuttle
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Grandview Dr
Railroad Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
þ101
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Existing Transit Facilities
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet
Daly City CBTP
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æ
%&'(280
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station

PLACEWORKS
I2
I2
Study Area
E
Communites
quity Priority
Bus Stops
BART Stations
Caltrain Stations
BART
Caltrain
SamTrans Routes
SF Municipal
Transportation Agency
Daly City
Bayshore Shuttle
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Grandview Dr
Railroad Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
þ101
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Existing Transit Facilities
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet
Daly City CBTP
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 29
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Trans routing changes resulting from the operational analysis known as Reimagine SamTrans, recommendations from which were adopted in June 2022 (see Chapter 3). As stated by SamTrans staff, full operation of Reimagine SamTrans routing may be restricted by driver shortages.

The study area is also served by two San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (MUNI) routes along Geneva Avenue in the northeast (Bayshore) EPC and the area immediately surrounding the Daly City BART Station. The northeast EPC is served by the City of Daly City Bayshore Shuttle, which provides free service between the Bayshore neighborhood and Daly City BART, as well as transit connections with SamTrans, Muni and the Balboa BART station.

2.3.2 Paratransit
The entire Daly City CBTP study area is served by SamTrans’ Redi-Wheels paratransit service, servicing those who are unable to use regular, accessible fixed-route transit service. SamTrans conducts in-person evaluations to determine full Redi-Wheels eligibility and issues a Redi-Wheels identification card to those deemed eligible.

Redi-Wheels rides are typically scheduled between one and seven days in advance, or by appointment times at medical and other facilities. Redi-Wheels riders may schedule transfers to other transit agencies and ride regularly scheduled SamTrans fixed-route buses for free.

MUNI’s San Francisco Paratransit program also serves the northeast EPC. The program includes pre-scheduled, shared ADA-compliant van service; Paratransit Taxi service, pre-scheduled group van transportation and The “Van Gough Shuttle” which provides groups of seniors and/or people with disabilities rides to cultural events in San Francisco.

2.3.3 Bicycle Network
Figure 2-11 illustrates the citywide bicycle network as of 2019. It includes a mix of bicycle facility types and provides some connectivity with transit. The following bikeways are represented:
■ Class I bike paths. These are generally paved off-street routes separate from automobile rights-of-way.
■ Class II bike lanes. These are on-street bikeways marked by striping and bike symbols .
■ Class III bike routes. These are bike routes shared with automobiles and typically marked with “bike route” signage and/or “sharrows” that suggest cyclists may use the full lane.

Generally, the CBTP study area is unserved by Class I bike facilities and dedicated Class IV bicycle infrastructure. Only the western side of the northwest EPC is served by a Class I facility, on John Daly Blvd. The northeast EPC is limited to one Class II path on Geneva Boulevard and a single Class III path to the south. The central EPC is the most bike-accessible tract, with a network of Class III paths running in all directions and a Class II path at the northern border. The southern EPC has two Class II bike paths running north-south, including one at its eastern border. The lack of east-west connections here limit neighborhood accessibility for bicyclists.

Examples of existing Class II lanes in Daly City are located on:
■ Geneva Ave. from Bayshore Blvd. to San Francisco city limit ■ Southgate Ave. from Crestwood Dr. to Francis Blvd.
■ Eastmoor Ave. from Santa Paula Dr. to Southgate Ave.
■ Gellert Blvd from Hickey Blvd. to King Dr.
■ Callan Blvd. from Serramonte Blvd. to King Dr.

Examples of existing Class III routes in Daly City are located on:
■ Crocker Ave. from South Hill Blvd. to Mission St.
■ Bellevue Ave. from Crocker Ave. to Daly City limit
■ Junipero Serra Blvd. from John Daly Blvd to south of San Pedro Road ■ Skyline Dr. from Westridge Ave. to City of Pacifica limit ■ San Pedro Rd./E. Market St. from Eastmoor Ave. to Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy. ■ Callan Blvd. from Southgate Ave to Serramonte Blvd.

Moreover, as described in Section 3.3.1 of this report, the city adopted Walk Bike Daly City: City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, in 2020. The plan proposes new separated bikeways on multiple major roadways, among other bicycle infrastructure improvements

30 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 2-11 Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Gran
Railroad Ave
dview Dr
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Sta�on
Colma BART
Sta�on
South San Francisco
BART Sta�on
Bayshore Caltrain
Sta�on
South San Francisco
Caltrain Sta�on
Regional Bicycling Facili�es
Source: Metropolitan Transporta�on Commission, 2018; SamTrans, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Equity Priority Communities
Existing Bikeways
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Path
Class III Bike Route
Proposed Bikeways
Proposed Class I Bike Path
Proposed Class II Bike Path
Proposed Class III Bike Route
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Grandview Dr
Railroad Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Sta�on
Colma BART
Sta�on
South San Francisco
BART Sta�on
Bayshore Caltrain
Sta�on
South San Francisco
Caltrain Sta�on
Regional Bicycling Facili�es
Source: Metropolitan Transporta�on Commission, 2018; SamTrans, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 1,300 2,600 650
Feet

PLACEWORKS
Study Area
Equity Priority Communities
Existing Bikeways
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Path
Class III Bike Route
Proposed Bikeways
Proposed Class I Bike Path
Proposed Class II Bike Path
Proposed Class III Bike Route
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Daly City CBTP

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 31
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

3. Previous and Current Studies
Agencies with jurisdiction in the CBTP study area have adopted studies that expose mobility gaps in the study area and establish projects, plans, and policies to fill those gaps. This section provides a review of these previous studies and the transportation gaps they highlight.

The results of these studies are valuable to understanding and assessing the community input and recommendations outlined in Chapters 4 and 5 of this plan.

3.1 San Mateo County General Plan
The San Mateo County General Plan provides information on existing natural and man-made conditions of the physical environment. It identifies key plans, regulations and agencies that affect planning decisions and makes recommendations for improving coordination between them. The plan indicates the type of development that the County desires, where it should be located and how it should be regulated.

Chapter 12 of the General Plan contains Transportation Policies that establish the county’s transportation-related goals. These include the safe movement of people and goods; the creation of complete streets that serve all modes; increasing the use of transit and ridesharing; and minimizing adverse environmental impacts resulting from transportation system improvements, among others.

San Mateo County has also adopted a series of area, neighborhood and community plans that are considered part of the General Plan. These local documents guide decisions about physical development and circulation within a given community or district. They allow for local application of the broader policies contained in the General Plan.

3.2 Daly City General Plan
The City of Daly City updated its Circulation Element as part of the General Plan Update in 2013. The Circulation Element identifies policies to ensure that adequate transportation facilities are maintained through 2030, to invest in facilities that complement land uses, and to provide a transportation system with a range of choices. In Daly City, topics given special attention include traffic improvements, public transit, bicycle facilities, and mitigation strategies for impacts from individual developments.

Roadway improvements recommended as feasible and necessary to improving the transportation network within the study areas are listed below:
■ Geneva Avenue Extension
■ John Daly Boulevard Overcrossing
■ John Daly Boulevard/Lake Merced Boulevard: Optimize Signal Timings and Adjust Signal Phasing ■ John Daley Boulevard/Park Plaza Drive: Optimize Signal Timings ■ Lake Merced Boulevard/Southgate Avenue Signal
■ I-280 Overcrossings: Pedestrian Improvements
■ Serramonte Boulevard/SR-1 On/Off Ramp: Install Traffic Signal ■ Serramonte Boulevard/Callan Boulevard: Install Traffic Signal ■ St. Francis Boulevard/Clarinada Avenue: Install Traffic Signal ■ Clarinada Avenue/SR-1 On/Off Ramp: Install Traffic Signal In addition to future roadway improvements, the following policies or tasks identify gaps in transportation infrastructure and service in the study area:
■ Task CE-4.4: As part of the comprehensive infrastructure plan for the Geneva Avenue Corridor identified in Task LU-3.2, develop an infrastructure enhancement fee program specific to new development in the Bayshore area which provides funding for any necessary circulation, utility, and joint-benefit projects planned in this area.

32 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County ■ Task CE-7.2: Participate in efforts by MUNI to extend the 14 Mission Street bus service to the Daly City BART Station to the extent that such a connection does not require the installation of additional utilities in Daly City’s right-of-way or create a visual blight on John Daly Boulevard.
■ Task CE-7.3: Participate in efforts by MUNI to extend the T-Third light rail line and construct a multimodal Bayshore transit station.
■ Task CE-7.4: Support efforts to enhance MUNI and SamTrans service in the Bayshore neighborhood.
■ Task CE-8.1: Work with both San Mateo County Transit District and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency to explore the concept of peak-hour exclusive bus-only lanes along Mission Street and Geneva Avenue. ■ Task CE-11.3: Explore amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to require the payment of parking in-lieu fees for parcels 5,000 square feet or less with direct frontage on Mission Street or Geneva Avenue. As part of any such amendment, the City shall identify capital improvement(s) for both Mission Street and Geneva Avenue toward which in-lieu money is expended within a certain time. These improvements may include any improvements that enhance parking, pedestrian mobility, or public transit access along each respective corridor. ■ Task CE-13.1: As part of the comprehensive infrastructure and streetscape plan for the Geneva Avenue Corridor (see Task LU-3.2), ensure that both public and private improvements provide significant accommodation of both pedestrian and bicycle transportation modes.
■ Task CE-14.1: As part of any City involvement in or comments provided for the Geneva Avenue connection with the Candlestick Highway 101 Interchange, work toward the inclusion of both pedestrian and bicycle transportation modes that, at a minimum, extend those identified in the Geneva Avenue infrastructure plan, and/or Daly City Bicycle Route Map.
■ Policy CE-15: Ensure the new buildings along Mission Street and Geneva Avenue are situated so that they are easily accessible by pedestrians. ■ Task CE-16.6: Work with BART on providing safe pedestrian access to and from the Daly City BART Station that utilizes existing street level crossings on John Daly Boulevard and maximizes either existing or future grade separated crossing(s) at this location.

3.3 Local Transportation and Land Use Plans

3.3.1 Walk Bike Daly City: City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan 2020
This 2020 Plan lays out priority improvements, conceptual designs and supporting actions to expand the City’s network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, close facility gaps and connect key destinations. The plan acknowledges that walking is the most fundamental form of transportation and that more people walk than bike in Daly City. Notably, the Plan requires that new development and redevelopment projects contribute to adjacent pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as appropriate.

The “Tier I” priority projects established in the Plan showcase identified bike/ped gaps and the City’s overall strategy to fill those gaps. For example, Tier I priority pedestrian projects indicate the challenges of barriers related to key arterials in the City. Projects include:

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 33
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County ■ New crossing of John Daly Boulevard (between Niantic Avenue and Willits Street) to the Daly City BART station entrance.
■ Improvements to the intersection of John Daly Boulevard / Junipero Serra Boulevard / I-280 ramps / Highway 1 ramps. ■ Improvements to the intersection of John Daly Boulevard / Skyline Boulevard. ■ Improvements to the intersection of Serramonte Boulevard / Highway 1 ramps.

Tier I priority bikeways projects also indicate existing gaps in bike facilities on arterials in the City. Projects include:
■ Bike lanes and separated bikeways on John Daly Boulevard between Junipero Serra Boulevard and De Long Street
■ Separated two-way bikeway on the north side of John Daly Boulevard between Sheffield Drive and Junipero Serra Boulevard
■ Separated bikeways on John Daly Boulevard between Skyline Boulevard and Fairmont Drive / Ashland Drive; or extension of the path on the south side of John Daly to Skyline Boulevard.
■ Multi-use path from the intersection of John Daly / Skyline Boulevard to Northgate Avenue / N. Mayfair Avenue ■ Separated bikeways on Skyline Boulevard through Daly City

3.3.2 2020 Daly City Vision Zero Action Plan
In 2018, Daly City received a grant from the Federal Highway Administration to develop a Vision Zero Action Plan to eliminate traffic deaths in Daly City, the first such plan in San Mateo County. The 2020 Action Plan uses a data- and community-driven process to establish a local course of traffic safety in the city. The Vision Zero Action Plan includes a detailed 2013-2107 crash analysis based on data from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. It includes a series of roadway safety strategies and countermeasures, as well as a comprehensive Safety Plan and evaluation strategy.

The Vision Zero Action Plan represents Daly City’s prioritization of safe mobility for all transportation modes and groups. It will benefit the entire CBTP study area and highlight existing transportation liabilities and solutions.

3.3.3 2021 Unincorporated San Mateo County Active
Transportation Plan
The County of San Mateo Office of Sustainability completed a framework to improve conditions for pedestrian and cyclists throughout unincorporated communities in 2021. Working towards the five major objectives of Access, Safety, Equity, Mode Share and Flexibility, the Plan establishes project and programmatic recommendations in 33 unincorporated areas. These were developed to connect 11 priority destinations for a safe and connected on-street active transportation network. The Plan includes:
■ Twenty-four pedestrian focus areas
■ Fifty-two miles of protected bikeways and trails
■ Twenty-nine programs and policies

34 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Bicycle recommendation, including proposed facilities, wayfinding resources and parking, were developed to benefit cyclists of all comfort levels. Similarity, proposed pedestrian projects respond to both existing safety data and community-identified gaps, with groups of recommendations developed to benefit rural, urban and suburban locations.

3.3.4 Colma BART Station Area Plan
The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors adopted the Colma Bart Station Area Plan in 1994. The plan provides recommendations to support the transition of the unincorporated area surrounding the Colma BART station into an urban center with high density housing and commercial uses. In addition to land use and community character objectives, it included a series of transportation and circulation objectives, including:
■ Design streets and paths for walking
■ Provide safe and convenient bicycle improvements
■ Provide an interconnected street system
■ Direct BART traffic aways from residential neighborhoods The plan includes multiple bicycle and pedestrian-oriented recommendations to support these transportation objectives, such as:
■ The construction of Class II bikeways on El Camino, San Pedro Road and A Street. ■ Requiring short-term bike parking in areas designated Neighborhood Commercial and long-term bike parking in areas designated High Density Residential. ■ The creation of a pedestrian pathway between El Camino Real and the BART Station.
■ Implementation of pedestrian crossing improvements at various major intersections.

3.4 Countywide Plans and Studies
To better understand gaps in the transportation network, the following policy documents were evaluated to identify proposed transportation projects and plans in the study area.

3.4.1 San Mateo County Transportation Plan for 2040
The San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan for 2040 (SMCTP 2040) is a longrange, comprehensive transportation planning document that promotes compatibility among all transportation plans and programs within the county. SMCTP 2040 outlines transportation issues associated with countywide growth and establishes overall strategies and programs to overcome the challenges.

SMCTP 2040 includes a list of Proposed Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Projects comprised of longer-term improvements encouraged by the MTC’s twenty-year RTP.

Some are located, or indicate potential transportation gaps, in the current study area. These include:
■ Mission Street/El Camino Real as part of Grand Boulevard Initiative. ■ Provide overcrossing at 1-280/John Daly Boulevard, a project could benefit the northwest COC directly.
■ 1-280 improvements near D Street exit.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 35
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

3.4.2 San Mateo County Transportation Plan follow up:

Final Action Plan
The SMCTP 2040 Follow-Up Plan (Final Action Plan) was developed by a multi-agency Working Group to ensure the that goals, projects and programs in SMCTP 2040 would be implemented appropriately. The Final Action Plan:
■ Establishes regional and local roles & responsibilities; ■ Assesses the effectiveness of performance measures in SMCTP 2040 and identifies accountability measures to ensure the Action Plan is reviewed and updated as needed;
■ Includes recommendations for effective community outreach and equitable planning; and
■ Summarizes existing and potential funding sources on the local, state and federal levels.

The Final Action Plan prioritizes funding decisions that consider equity, and stresses that the results of County CBTPs should be used to inform the development of the next SMCTP update.

3.4.3 2021 San Mateo US 101 Express Lanes Equity
Study
This study, completed by the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority (SMCEL-JPA), addresses longstanding racial inequities and community fracturing associated with the US 101 corridor in San Mateo County. The study establishes a Pilot Equity Program by which toll revenue from the new San Mateo US 101 Express Lanes will be invested to fund transportation benefits for historically underserved communities.

Following a series of technical analyses and a comprehensive community outreach process, The SMCEL-JPA developed a Recommended Equity Program designed to support underserved communities and encourage mode shift from single-occupancy vehicle to transit and other modes. It consists of the following four recommendations:

1. Pre-Loaded Toll Tags. Provide eligible recipients with a new FasTrak Flex toll tag that has been pre-loaded with $50 cash value.

2. Cash on Clipper. Provide eligible recipients with $50 cash value on a new or existing Clipper Card.

3. Clipper START and FasTrak START Enrollment. Enroll qualifying individuals in these regional programs that provide significant benefits to low-income travelers.
● Clipper START. This regional transit fare discount program provides low-income individuals with up to a 50% discount on participating transit services. ● FasTrak START. This program is currently under development by MTC. It proposes to provide discounted tolls on Express Lanes to qualifying low-income individuals.

4. Support for Local Organizations. Provide local service providers and community-based organizations with resources to extend awareness, reach and impact of the Pilot Equity Program.

36 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

3.4.4 2021 C/CAG San Mateo County Comprehensive
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (CBPP) presents the network and policy recommendations for improving walking and biking in San Mateo County.

The plan provides recommendations to develop the Countywide Backbone Bicycling Network and Pedestrian Focus Areas, including a gap analysis identifying where new projects are needed, and provides a project list and map, and proposed programs.

Pedestrian Focus Areas are regionally significant areas within the county that are likely to have the highest walking activity. Candidate projects include transit access and Complete Street corridor improvements. Multiple Pedestrian Focus Areas are in the CBTP study area. Pedestrian Focus Areas are prioritized for funding through the CBPP, and the CBPP recommends relevant project and design.

The countywide bike network, called the Backbone Network, links regionally significant destinations across local jurisdictions with the goal of addressing gaps between city boundaries and providing continuous, low-stress bikeways across the county.

Public input received during the outreach process revealed strong support for improved connectivity, mode shift opportunities and safety, including:
■ A more continuous sidewalk network and safe crossings. ■ A more continuous regional bikeway network.
■ A countywide micromobility program.
■ Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and comfort along arterials and highway crossings.
■ More separated bike lanes and facilities that create a stronger sense of safety and more protection from motor vehicles.

3.4.5 Reimagine SamTrans
The San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Board of Directors adopted the recommendations of a comprehensive operational analysis known as Reimagine SamTrans in 2022. The analysis was based on extensive public outreach and internal evaluation of the transit system to identify improvements for design, connections, routing, timing and other components. The following community priorities came out of the outreach process:
■ More frequent service
■ Faster routes with fewer stops
■ Better real-time arrival information
■ Better connections to BART, Caltrain and other rail systems Reimagine SamTrans is designed to achieve goals of equity, efficiency and connectivity. The analysis found gaps related to route duplication, rail access and bus headways in and accessing Daly City. As a result, it includes recommendations such as changes in headways, timing and rerouting of some bus lines serving Daly City and Colma BART stations, such as 112, 121 and 130.

Many of the program changes adopted as part of Reimagine SamTrans are consistent with community feedback collected during this CBTP process.

3.4.6 San Mateo County Senior Mobility Guide
The Senior Mobility Guide provides information to help San Mateo County residents remain mobile as they age. It outlines a series of programs provided through a range of agencies in the county, including:
■ Bayshore/Brisbane Senior Shuttle: This ride-request service operates during the midday and connects to the Bayshore Caltrain Station. Passengers may call to request a ride within the service area.
■ American Cancer Society – Road to Recovery: A program staffed by volunteer drivers who pick up cancer patients at their homes and take them to anything cancer-related, including doctor’s appointments, radiation treatments, and chemotherapy.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 37
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County ■ Seton Medical Center (Seton BART Shuttle): This hospital offers limited transportation for patients from Daly City BART to Seton Medical Center. ■ Go-Go Grandparent: This nationwide service offers rides 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to all. Vehicles can transport folding wheelchairs and passengers who are transferable, and fares are quoted based on distance traveled and time traveled. ■ Serra Yellow Cab: This program offers dispatch service to/from Daly City, Colma, Brisbane, Pacifica, Broadmoor, Millbrae, Burlingame, Hillsborough, Foster City, Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City and SFO.
■ SilverRide: This service provides assisted transportation for older adults who want to get things done, socialize and have enriching life experiences. ■ SamTrans Redi-Wheels: This paratransit service is available for people whose disabilities or health conditions prevent them from using the bus.

3.4.7 San Mateo County Transportation Plan for LowIncome Populations The objective of the Countywide Transportation Plan for Low-Income Populations is to fulfill transportation needs of disadvantaged communities in the county. This Plan outlines the following barriers to project implementation based on analyses of previous planning efforts, including the 2008 Bayshore CBTP:
■ Lack of appropriate sustainable and stable funding sources. ■ The absence of a process to promote implementation of projects. ■ Projects that require unusual, complex, or difficult partnerships. ■ Projects that require a degree of administrative resources beyond that of sponsoring agencies.

A series of transportation improvement projects was developed based on a community outreach process. The following impact the study area directly:
■ Add more bus shelters in Daly City.
■ Improve SamTrans connections and service, especially evening services along major arterials.
■ Improve connections and increase service to destinations important to low-income populations. ■ Improve crosswalk safety along John Daly Boulevard in Daly City. ■ Employ a full-time crossing guard at Mission Street and San Pedro Road in Daly City.

38 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County This page intentionally left blank.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 39
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

4. Outreach and Engagement Summary
All CBTP recommendations are based on a diverse community outreach campaign consistent with Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Guidelines. The project and plans recommended in this CBTP are the result of outreach to communities in geographic and demographic cross-sections of the study area.

Outreach and engagement included the following:

1. Oversight by an Advisory Group

2. Development of a C/CAG- and MTC-approved
Outreach Strategy

3. Creation and distribution of awareness materials

4. Coordination with community leadership

5. A virtual “Town Hall” meeting

6. Distribution of an online transportation survey

7. Interactive “Pop-Up” events at various events in the study area All materials and raw results of the outreach and engagement process are included in Appendix B to this Plan.

4.1 CBTP Advisory Group
As stated in Chapter 1, a combined Advisory Group (AG) was convened for C/CAG’s Daly City and Southeast San Mateo County CBTPs. This was to ensure an inclusive outreach process during COVID-19, provide direction on reaching specific groups in the community, review milestone materials, prioritize outreach opportunities and inform and prioritize final recommendations. Members of the AG who attended at least one of the meetings include:
■ Susy Kalkin, Transportation Systems Coordinator, C/CAG San Mateo County ■ Malahat Owrang, Senior Transportation Planner, City of Redwood City ■ Raleigh McCoy, Regional Planning Program, Metropolitan Transportation Commission ■ Kevin Chen, Senior Transportation Engineer, City of Menlo Park ■ Gwen Buckley, Senior Planner, SamTrans
■ Chanda Singh, Senior Transportation Planner, County of San Mateo ■ Batool Zaro, Assistant Engineer, City of East Palo Alto ■ Michael Van Lonkhuysen, Planning Manager, City of Daly City ■ Lenelle Suliguin, Senior Management Analyst, City of Daly City ■ Elena Lee, Planning Division Manager, City of East Palo Alto ■ Jean Higaki, Program Director, C/CAG San Mateo County ■ Vikrant Sood, Social Equity Principal Planner
■ Sandhya Laddha, Policy Director, Silicon Valley Biking Coalition ■ David Pape, Senior Planner, SamTrans
■ Susan Houston, Vice President of Older Services, Peninsula Family Services ■ Will Gibson, Planner III, San Mateo County Planning & Building ■ Julia Malmo-Layock, Active Transportation Planner, County of San Mateo ■ John Ford, Executive Director, Commute.org
■ Rebecca Roberts, Employer Programs Representative, Commute.org ■ Michelle Daher, Management Analyst, City of East Palo Alto ■ Joe LaClair, Planning Services Manager, San Mateo County ■ Eduardo Gonzalez, Program Manager, Youth Leadership Institute ■ Joel Slavit, Active/Transportation/Senior Sustainability Specialist, Livable Communities, County of San Mateo The AG met four times, including one traditional in-house meeting and three virtual meetings. The AG also completed online reviews of draft recommendations and reports. Meeting topics and dates are detailed in the following sections.

40 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

4.2 Outreach Process
The COVID-19 pandemic started following C/CAG approval of the original CBTP Outreach Strategy. As such, the CBTP team and AG later adapted the components, timing and sequence of the Strategy to the health restrictions and shelter-in-place mandates beginning in February 2020. In order to illustrate the relationship of COVID-19 on the community engagement process, the following outreach summary is organized chronologically.

4.2.1 August 2019 to February 2020: Initial Outreach
Strategy
The initial outreach strategy phase of the CBTP was from August 2019 to December 2020. During this time, the CBTP team coordinated with the AG to develop and review the Community Needs Assessment report (Appendix A of this study) and discuss early outreach strategies.

AG Meeting #1: Introduction and Outreach Planning
The first AG meeting was convened on August 20, 2019. The CBTP team introduced the CBTP process and Daly City study area, as well as key elements of Community Needs Assessment. The AG discussed challenges of to the engagement process as well as specific opportunities for partnerships. Engagement resources suggested by AG members included, but were not limited to:
■ Serramonte Shopping Center
■ Westlake Shopping Center
■ Serramonte Farmer’s market
■ Lincoln Park
■ St. Andrew’s Church
■ San Mateo County Health Department
■ Seton Hospital
■ Information in Reimagine SamTrans
AG Meeting #2: Outreach Strategy Review
Using information and insight from Meeting #1, the CBTP Team completed the initial CBTP Outreach Strategy in October 2019. The Strategy was based on a process of developing partnerships with community-based organizations (CBOs), completing face-to-face interviews and facilitating community events. The COVID-19 pandemic started during the early phase of implementation.

The second AG meeting was held on February 14, 2020. The full impact of the pandemic, including shelter-in-place mandates, was not yet clear. AG members assisted the CBTP team to identify potential outreach partners, including community stakeholders, community-based organizations (CBOs), and community events. The CBTP team began engaging with these potential partners in this phase, establishing contacts and additional resources.

4.2.2 March-November 2020: Covid-19 and Digital
Outreach
The impacts of COVID-19 on community health priorities and the need to rethink traditional engagement began to peak in March 2020. At this time, the CBTP team reassessed outreach strategies and the availability of community partnerships. In order to facilitate EPC involvement in this initial period of shelter-in-place mandates, the CBTP developed a series of adaptable digital resources.

Project Webpage
The CBTP team developed a project webpage on the C/CAG website containing background information and to function as a clearing house for deliverables, outreach resources and associated external links. The webpage was initially populated with introductory text and the Daly City Community Needs Assessment report. Links to the outreach survey (see below) and AG meeting presentations we added as they became available.

Outreach Flier
Working with the AG and C/CAG staff, the CBTP team developed a graphics-rich Outreach Awareness Flier to provide notice of future outreach opportunities. The flier was developed in English and Spanish (see Figures 4-1 and 4-2) to illustrate the CBTP study area and summarize the project intent. The flier was later uploaded to the

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 41
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County C/CAG webpage on websites of agencies and stakeholders involved in the project.

The flier was also adapted for hard-copy distribution at live outreach events that were facilitated later in the CBTP process.

Transportation Survey
In November 2020, the CBTP team completed a bilingual on-line survey of mobility barriers (see Appendix B) designed to assess rates of active transportation and transit use, identify barriers to those options, and highlight community resources (hospitals, supermarkets, etc.) that are difficult to access. Working with MTC, the CBTP team ultimately added questions about mobility challenges associated with shelter-in-place restrictions and changing work conditions due to COVID-19. The digital survey was made available on the C/CAG project webpage, Jefferson Union High School District webpage, and various jurisdictions in English and Spanish. It was also noticed via the outreach flier described above.

AG Meeting #3: COVID-19 Assessment and Approach
The CBTP team presented to the AG at a third meeting on August 24, 2020. The topic of the meeting was new impacts to community participation resulting from COVID-19. The AG discussed the challenges of social distancing recommendations, health concerns for participants and facilitators, and changing priorities for potential CBOs partners such as employment, childcare, and medical assistance. The AG also agreed that EPC residents, whose input must shape CBTP recommendations, represented some of the populations most impacted by COVID-19.

Representatives from MTC attended the meeting. It was agreed that fully digital/ online engagement was not an adequate substitute for traditional community outreach, and that the CBTP would need to engage in a transitional approach involving city assistance and online event planning.

4.2.3 Early-mid 2021: Virtual City Outreach
Implementation of an equitable and effective outreach plan remained challenging in the first half of 2021 due to COVID-19 surges and restrictions. Members of the AG and community leaders expressed concern that many residents of ECPs would not be adequately represented in the CBTP engagement process due to lack of digital resources and required focus on the daily challenges of living with the pandemic.

42 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 4-1 Outreach Awareness Flier Figure 4-2 Outreach Awareness Flier (Spanish Version)

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 43
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County As a result of these challenges, the CBTP team coordinated directly with City staff and leadership. The intent of the following virtual efforts was to review the current outreach effort and brainstorm new strategies for penetrating EPC communities in the new reality of COVID-19.

Daly City City Council
On February 22, 2021, the CBTP team facilitated a virtual presentation to the Daly City City Council to solicit ideas for penetrating EPCs and increasing community participation. The meeting focused on the impacts of COVID-19 to the outreach process, including:
■ Equity issues associated with the “digital divide” and lack of broadband access in EPCs.
■ The COVID-19 mobility landscape in EPCs, including new commute challenges, economic challenges, and daily priorities.
■ The impacts of COVID-19 on Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) originally identified as partners in the CBTP process.

City Council members expressed multiple ideas for reaching EPC residents. Foremost:
■ Mayor Juslyn Manalo and others expressed support for a citywide virtual outreach event noticed with City resources, including the City’s newsletter and mailer support networks.
■ CBTP outreach must target Tagalog-speaking Pacific Islander/Pilipinx communities in EPCs. Councilmembers identified numerous organizations as potential partners, including the Pilipino Bayanihan Resource Center (PBRC), Pacific Islanders Together and Second Harvest. ■ Coordination with local schools was deemed vital, including Jefferson High School, Bayshore Elementary School, Woodrow Wilson Elementary School, and Jefferson Elementary School.
■ The CBTP team should consider shopping centers and local supermarkets for outreach.
“Local Transportation Challenges” Town Hall
On May 17, 2021, the project team presented to the entire Daly City community at a “Virtual Town Hall” meeting hosted by the City. An English-, Spanish, Mandarin- and Tagalog-language notice and registration link was published in the City of Daly City Spring 2021 Newsletter. The event was also noticed using the CBTP Outreach Flier shown in Figures 4-1 and 4-2.

44 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County The CBTP team introduced the process and study area, as well as initial feedback collected from the CBTP survey. An “Open Feedback” session was facilitated, in order to collect feedback regarding:
■ Places in EPCs that are hard to get to;
■ Transit improvements that would meet special mobility needs; ■ Transit routes that feel unsafe or unpredictable;
■ Impact pf COVID on mobility options.

Participants were directed to the C/CAG project webpage and briefed on how to access digital and hard copies of the CBTP survey.

4.2.4 Late 2021-2022: In-Person Outreach
Late 2021 saw increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates and relaxation of shelter-inplace mandates. At this time, the CBTP team utilized previous input from AG members, City leaders and community surveys to to schedule a series of “Pop-Up” outreach sessions at pre-scheduled events in and near Daly City EPCs.

The goals of these events were to collect detailed feedback about transportation challenges directly from EPC residents and record personal narratives describing how these challenges impact daily life. CBTP project staff set up information and feedback tables at each event, with the following visual elements to prompt discussion:
■ Project information and awareness flier
■ Poster-sized study area map boards
■ Hard copies of the transportation survey
■ Poster-sized existing transportation network boards
■ Existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian network maps CBTP members facilitated the following exercises with attendees to achieve the goals of the pop-up events. Raw results of these exercises are provided in Appendix B. ■ Map and Dot Exercises. CBTP team members used study area boards to allow participants to illustrate transportation gaps and challenges. Participants highlighted mobility challenges and recommendations with color-coded dot stickers and used markers to illustrate travel routes, gaps, and potential solutions. ■ Open Comment Cards. CBTP team members used comment cards to allow participants to expand on map comments or record specific narratives about challenges and ideas for improvement.
■ Survey Distribution. Facilitators passed out the transportation survey, as well as fliers with links to the digital survey, to event participants.

The CBTP team categorized feedback from these sessions into the following four groups of mobility challenges:

1. Pedestrian Mobility Challenges: These are challenges related to gaps in, and conditions of, pedestrian facilities and infrastructure. This category also includes physical barriers to pedestrian mobility, such as dangerous railroad and highway intersections.

2. Bicycle Mobility Challenges: These are challenges related to gaps in, and conditions of, bikeways. This category also includes physical barriers to bicycling, such as dangerous highway intersections.

3. Transit Challenges: Challenges related to transit access, bus stops, and shelters, fixed-route planning and service, paratransit service, and transit cost.

4. Safety and Other Challenges: These are challenges to safe and secure mobility, disabled access, and student access and safety.

The location of all outreach events described above are illustrated on Figure 4-3 (virtual events are shown as located at City Hall).

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 45
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County !(
!(
!(!(
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2022. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
I2
I2
!(
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City Community Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) Study Area

PLACEWORKS
!(
!(!(
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY
CBTP Study
Equity Priority Community
Daly City
I2 BART Station
I2 Caltrain Station
!( Outreach Event Location
Æþ101
%&'(280
Figure 4-3 Location of CBTP Outreach Events
Serramonte
Farmer’s Market
Daly City
City Council Meeting
Daly City
Town Hall Meeting
2nd Annual
Bayshore Block Party
Colma BART Station Free
Speech Area

46 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County October 16, 2021: 2nd Annual Bayshore Block Party
The Bayshore Block Party is a community event hosted by the Bayshore Parent Teacher Organization (PTO) of Bayshore Elementary School. This event is popular among Bayshore neighborhood families. Small businesses, police and fire departments, community organizations, Daly City school districts and other groups were represented at the event.

In addition to community members, The CBTP team interviewed members of the Bayshore PTO, Bayshore School staff members, San Mateo County District 5 Supervisor David J. Canepa and a Board Trustee of the Jefferson Union School District.

Participation
CBTP team members facilitated map exercises and/or discussions with 26 individuals and recorded 17 comments. Four hard copy transportation surveys were also submitted at the meeting. Participation is shown in Figure 4-4.

Summary of Results
Bayshore Block Party attendees described barriers to active transportation, transit use and safety. However, Figure 4-5 shows that of the almost 50 total individual responses collected at the event, nearly three-quarters were related to transit and safety challenges, with fewer bicycle and pedestrian challenges represented. This trend is not surprising, given that many participants were parents of small children, the proximity of Bayshore neighborhood to the Cow Palace and major throughfares such as Geneva Avenue, and the historic lack of transit service in the EPC.

Responses were generally focused on the area surrounding the school. Many participants stressed the impacts of illegal vehicle racing associated with Cow Palace events on surrounding streets. Vehicle speeds and lack of traffic calming were identified as high -risk conditions. Transit issues focused on lack of transit service to regional rail, such as Balboa BART Station, as well as retail centers.

Figure 4-4 Bayshore Block Party Participation Rates
0 5
10 15
30 20
25 Board and Dot
Feedback Participants
Survey
Responders
Written
Commenters

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 47
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County The following are patterns of mobility concerns and barriers recorded during the event. They have been clarified for readability and/or transferred from markings on maps. However, they include original insight and ideas, and have not been groundtruthed against current conditions and/or ongoing plans and projects. The latter process occurred during the evaluation and prioritization of CBTP recommendations presented in Chapter 5 of this study.

Figure 4-5 Bayshore Block Party Results Summary by Topic Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Safety
29%
17%
10%
45%
Bicycle Challenges
Participants identified:
■ General lack of bike lanes, gaps in existing lanes, and unsafe intersections ■ Need for “dedicated” bike lanes in Bayshore
■ Improved lighting and markings along Geneva Avenue bike lane Pedestrian Challenges
Participants identified:
■ The need for a more pedestrian-safe Geneva Avenue, with more and safer crossing opportunities ■ Need to repave sidewalks in Bayshore
■ Lack of crosswalks on long blocks
■ Dangerous pedestrian access conditions at Bayshore Elementary School Transit Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Lack of Transit Access to other Daly City schools (more than six comments) ■ Better bus routes and increased frequency to San Francisco (in particular Balboa BART Station)
■ Shuttle for seniors to shopping centers
■ Increased frequency of the Daly City Bayshore Shuttle ■ Better bus/transit materials in Cantonese
Safety Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Race Car community
● Loud Race Cars in Cow Palace
● Ottilia Street, Partridge Street, and Accacia Street are “racetracks” where cars do sideshows and donuts
“We must improve the frequency of the Bayshore Shuttle! It’s a lifeline!” -Bayshore Block Party Attendee
“Ottilia, Partridge & Accacia and other streets around the Cow Palace become racetracks. Sideshows, donuts, and speeding make the area unsafe.” -Bayshore Block Party Attendee

48 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County December 4, 2021: Serramonte Farmer’s Market
The Serramonte Farmer’s Market is a weekly farmer’s market in the Serramonte Center parking lot hosted by the California Farmers’ Markets Association. CBTP project staff facilitated a pop-up event at the market on Saturday, December 4, 2021, from 8:30 am to 12:00 pm. Individuals participated in the feedback process as they explored the market.

Participation
CBTP team members facilitated map exercises and/or discussions with 19 individuals and recorded 22 comments, as shown in Figure 4-6.
“It seems like there should more pedestrian protections on Callan, Westlake and Serramonte. Traffic and lighting are scary.” -Serramonte Farmer’s Market attendee
Summary of Results
Participants in this pop-up event expressed general concern for access and traffic-related safety at and surrounding Serramonte Mall. Other safety concerns included lack of lighting in surrounding residential areas. As shown in Figure 4-7, the largest number of attendee comments, about 60 percent, were focused on these safety issues.

Participants described the general difficulty of getting to Serramonte Center on transit or via active transportation. Many participants highlighted specific street segments, intersections and businesses on, or around, which traffic is a barrier.

Resulting reliance on driving creates bottlenecks into and out of the mall, and near popular destinations such as Target and In-N-Out. Some individuals identified lack of lighting in the Midvale Dr. and St. Francis neighborhood. Others named vehicle speeds along St. Francis Boulevard, Callan Boulevard and Wembley Drive as safety concerns. Many of the participants voiced the need for additional traffic calming measures on local streets.

Figure 4-6 Serramonte Farmer’s Market Participation Rates 0 5
10 15
20 25
Board and Dot
Feedback Participants
Survey
Responders
Written
Commenters

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 49
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Participant Input
Bicycle Challenges
Participants identified:
■ General “behind the curve” conditions of bike facilities and resulting difficulty of bike access around Serramonte Center
Pedestrian Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Dangerous conditions at intersection of Cerro Drive and Southgate Avenue ■ Need for better sidewalks along Serramonte Boulevard and Junipero Serra Boulevard ■ Need to repair “prepare to stop” signals on Westridge and Westmoor Avenues that are commonly out of service
Figure 4-7 Serramonte Farmer’s Market Results Summary by Topic Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Safety
9%
11%
62% 19%
Transit Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Need for “bus linkage” between Serramonte Center and other retail destinations in Daly City
■ Increased frequency of bus routes, especially SamTrans’ 110 and 120 ■ Need for a dedicated shuttle for seniors to shopping centers ■ Preparation of bus/transit marketing and information materials in Cantonese ■ Poor conditions of SamTrans Route 110 bus stops near Ranch 99 Market (250 Skyline Plaza)
■ Lack of transit access for Belcrest neighborhood at Belcrest Avenue and Longview Drive
Safety Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Unsafe conditions due to traffic bottlenecks at multiple Serramonte Center destinations, including and vehicle speeds on and around:
● Target
● Chick-fil-A
● In-N-Out Burger
● The Home Depot
■ Unsafe conditions due to traffic bottlenecks on:
● Callan Boulevard
● Serramonte Boulevard
● Saint Francis Boulevard
● Gellert Boulevard
■ Lack of adequate lighting in and around:
● Residential areas west of Saint Francis Boulevard and south of Highway 35/ Route 1 intersection
● Ranch 99 Market
■ Illegal dumping that contributes to sense of danger

50 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County February 8, 2022: Colma BART Station Free Speech Area
On February 8th, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm, team members facilitated a pop-up event in the “Free Speech Area” of the Colma BART station.

Participation
CBTP team members facilitated map exercises and/or discussions with eight BART riders and collected 12 comment cards, as shown in Figure 4-8.

Summary of Results
Not surprisingly, the majority of comments collected at the BART station were about gaps in station access and conditions at the station itself. For example, commenters cited bus frequency issues, specifically the SamTrans Routes 122 and 130. Others cited the need for improved pedestrian and bike facilities accessing the station (see Figure 4-9).
“Please widen the sidewalks and enable more bike lanes so I can get to the Colma BART Station.” -BART rider at Colma Station 0 2
Board and Dot Feedback
Participants
Written
Commenters
4 6
12 8
14 10
Figure 4-8 Colma BART Station Response Tally
Figure 4-9 Colma BART Station Results Summary
Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Safety
19% 18%
19%
44%

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 51
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Participant Input
Bicycle Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Need for bike lanes to and around the BART station
■ Lack of protected bike lanes around Colma BART station and in Daly City as a whole
Pedestrian Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Intersection at Mission Road/San Pedro Road/Market Street is complex and confusing
Transit Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Lack of shelters on SamTrans Route 130 around the station ■ The need for shorter commute hour headways on SamTrans Route 120 ■ New development projects in Daly City that will increase SamTrans ridership and need for increased BART route frequencies
■ Insufficient transit connection from Colma BART to Serramonte Mall Safety Challenges
Participants identified:
■ Colma Station can feel dirty and not well-maintained
■ Bus bays at Colma are unsafe or poorly-lit at night

4.2.5 In-Person Feedback Summary
As shown in Figure 4-10, just over 100 individual comments were collected from EPC community members during the in-person CBTP outreach process. This does not include on-line transportation survey responders. The CBTP team collected over 50 narrative comments from community members and facilitated mapping techniques with an equivalent number of people.

Figure 4-10 Total Participation Rates
0 20
50 60
80 100
120
Board and
Dot Feedback
Participants
Total
Participants
Survey
Responders
Written
Commenters
As shown in Figure 4-11, participating members of EPCs in Daly City named transitand safety- related issues as the most significant barriers to mobility. The rate of each among total input was about one-third. This may be partially attributed to the location of the EPCs and the location of the pop-up events. For example:
■ The location of the northeast/Bayshore EPC is historically underserved by regional and intra-city transit options. ■ Attendees of the Bayshore Block Party included parents of young children concerned about street and school safety. ■ Attendees of the Bayshore Block Party included various school district representatives who highlighted the lack of transit connections beween Bayhore Unified School Disiticts and Jefferson Union School District.
■ Many Serramonte Farmer’s Market attendees were senior citizens who identifed neighborhood lighting, bus shelter safety and transit safety concerns. ■ Particpants at the Colma BART Station event were transit riders by default, and thus more likely to be familiar with other local transit options.

52 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County ■ Current SamTrans bus routes do not serve residential subdivisions - no first/last leg connection. If any, it is too far and too long of a wait. Prefer that current battleship-sized SamTrans buses are smaller (i.e.: shuttle) so they can penetrate each residential subdivision.
■ Tener estaciones seguras con LUZ, bancas y paredes que protegen y que sean limpias ya que hay mucha neblina y viento en DC. Es súper difícil andar con bastón, bolsa, paraguas, suéter, chaqueta e impermeable...para ir al doctor o a la tienda. (Have safe stations with LIGHT, benches and walls that protect and are clean since there is a lot of fog and wind in DC. It is super difficult to walk with a cane, bag, umbrella, sweater, jacket and raincoat... to go to the doctor or to the store.)
Figure 4-11 Total Rate of Responses by Topic
Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Safety
42%
13%
11%
33%

4.3 Digital Survey Results
Digital survey responders were a generally evenly-distributed age group from the 94015 and 94014 ZIP codes. About one-quarter were 19-29 years old, one-quarter 30-44 years old and nearly a third were over the age of sixty. As shown in Figure 4-12, responders primarily ride BART and SamTrans. Responders who selected the “Other” category identified systems such as SF Muni and corporate shuttles. Route design and delays were the most commonly cited barriers to transit mobility. The location and quality of bus stops were also identified (see Figure 4-13).

Examples of specific transit barriers and improvements directly suggested by responders include:
■ Addition of feeder buses to/from SamTrans for households not on main SamTrans routes. Replacement of large-sized over-the-road coaches…with on-demand shuttle vans.

Figure 4-12 Transit Systems Ridden by Survey Responders 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Caltrain
BART
Samtrans
Other
Community Shu�le
Delays and unpredictability
Inadequate sta�ons or bus shelters
Hours of opera�on
Fares

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 53
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Figure 4-13 Impediments to Transit Mobility
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Route design/loca�on
Loca�on and spacing of bus stops
Delays and unpredictability
Inadequate sta�ons or bus shelters
Hours of opera�on
Fares
Figure 4-14 Impediments to Bicycle Mobility
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Lack of bike lanes
Gaps in exis�ng bike lanes
Dangerous streets or intersec�ons
Lack of secure bike parking
Cost of bike maintenance
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Poor sidewalk condi�ons
Poor ligh�ng and safety
Difficult intersec�ons
Unsafe school access
Figure 4-15 Impediments to Pedestrian Mobility
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Lack of bike lanes
Gaps in exis�ng bike lanes
Dangerous streets or intersec�ons
Lack of secure bike parking
Cost of bike maintenance
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Poor sidewalk condi�ons
Poor ligh�ng and safety
Difficult intersec�ons
Unsafe school access
Over 80 percent of responders stated they either “Never” or “Rarely” ride a bike.

They highlighted “Lack of bike lanes” and “Dangerous streets or intersections” as the main bike-related problems they encounter (Figure 4-14).

Examples of specific bicycle-related improvements suggested by responders include:
■ I’d love to ride a bike around town, such as to the BART station. However, there are no bike lanes on John Daly Blvd (west). I would not ride without protected bike lanes on that road.
■ The bike lane is so small, so cars dominate the road. If the bike lane were wider and if there was a way to have a safer, more protected lane for bikes, that would be ideal.

On the other hand, walking was common among those surveyed. About 50 percent of responders stated they walk “Daily”, while 34 precent walk “On occasion.” As shown on Figure 4-15, poor lighting, poor sidewalk conditions and dangerous intersections were identified as the biggest barriers to pedestrian mobility.

54 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Examples of specific pedestrian improvements suggested by responders include:
■ Several intersections around Mission Street, San Jose Ave, John Daly Blvd, and BART, are very difficult and/or scary for pedestrians. Some crosswalks have poor visibility at the corners. Some crosswalks require multiple light cycles to get all the way across. Several intersections have no crosswalk, and no convenient alternative, so pedestrians regularly attempt to walk through traffic to get across. ■ Pedestrian improvements that are needed are when walking at sundown, it seems hard to see without good lighting.
■ Outside of the residential areas, walking to the bank or groceries feels somewhat unsafe because the cars here like to drive quickly.

According to survey responders and shown in Figure 4-16, supermarkets, transit stations and medical facilities are considered “hard to get to” on a daily basis.

Responders were asked to identify specific hard-to-access places and describe improvements for improving access. Example answers include:
■ Target, supermarket, school, clinic. It would be easier if there were safe walking conditions and bike lanes.
■ [Access improvements needed to] Convenience stores etc. rather than Malls and hospitals. Can you imagine if SF buses only stopped at major dept stores and hospitals on Mission street?
■ Junipero Serra Blvd is not continuous for pedestrians or bicyclists. Suggest connect[ing] DC Bart with Colma BART with Serramonte Shopping Center. CREATE MORE BIKE ONLY / PEDESTRIAN ONLY ROUTES [original boldface]. Is there a shortcut from DC BART to School St without crossing I-280? There is a cyclone fenced area on eastside of I-280 that can be made into a pedestrian walkway. ■ [Community needs] multiple busses to the Bayshore [sic].

Figure 4-16 Places that are Hard to Get to Each Way
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Work
Supermarket
Transit Sta�on
School
Hospital or Medical Center

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 55
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

5. Methodology and Recommendations
This chapter identifies all recommended projects and plans for the Daly City CBTP.

It outlines the evaluation criteria, evaluation methodology, and scoring approach used to identify and rank those recommendations. Potential funding sources, a key consideration in the evaluation process, are summarized.

5.1 Evaluation Criteria
The CBTP project team worked with the Advisory Group (AG) at a fourth meeting on April 14, 2022, to review four evaluation criteria deemed appropriate to rank projects by their ability to improve mobility. Criteria such as community benefit, degree of transportation improvement, current relevance, future technological challenges, usability and access, available funding, potential for cross-jurisdictional challenges, and ability to resolve mobility barriers were discussed.

Ultimately, the following four criteria were selected to score projects and plans:

1. Reflects Community Priorities

2. Increases Access

3. Is Financially Feasible

4. Ease of Implementation

5.1.1 Reflects Community priorities
This criterion is the degree to which a project or plan is consistent with the priorities and needs of residents, community stakeholders, and leaders in Equity Priority Communities (EPC). Projects were ranked highly under this criterion if they:
■ Reflect a theme in the community feedback collected during the CBTP outreach process described in Chapter 4;
■ Are consistent with community mobility challenges identified in past plans and studies and the existing conditions analysis prepared for this CBTP; ■ Support transportation goals established in current plans and studies; and ■ Are consistent with projects prioritized in the 2008 Bayshore CBTP, but not yet implemented.

5.1.2 Increases Access
This criterion is the potential of a project to improve access to key facilities and locations across the study area. As noted in Chapter 1, the current CBTP study area is loosely based on four discontinuous EPCs located across Daly City. Given the geographic scale and diversity of mobility gaps across the study area, projects with one of two benefits score highly under this criterion: those that would improve connectivity between systems and those that would facilitate mobility for groups challenged by limited options.

5.1.3 Is Financially Feasible
Cost and feasibility are important considerations for evaluating projects. This criterion considers more than the anticipated budget of a project, as one project may be more expensive than another but it may be eligible for a range of different funding sources, while the other project may be less expensive but does not fit into readily available funding categories.

MTC’s CBTP guidelines are developed to ensure that mobility recommendations are the result of community input. Assessing the financial feasibility of projects is a tool to identify projects that are likely to find further support and move quickly to implementation. Projects were ranked under this criterion by estimates of hard costs, analyzing the potential for funding based on project type, and reviewing historical financial challenges.

One of the most significant considerations in this criterion was revenue loss to transit providers resulting from COVID-19, which have impacted the current flexibility of providers to fund new projects. Many transit recommendations in this plan are outside committed funding sources, while project outreach and research indicate high transit needs within the community. This increases the feasibility of projects that are aligned with existing plans and studies. This Plan assumes that future conditions will reposition the financial feasibility of transit projects and funding strategies for transit should continue to be developed.

56 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Ranking projects under this criterion included reviewing potential funding sources for local and countywide mobility projects. These include:
■ Senate Bill 375. California Senate Bill (SB) 375, passed in 2008, directs the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to set up regional targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions with regional Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs).

The GHG targets are implemented through the MPO’s regional Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS). Below are a list of funding and grants offered by MTC as part of their SCS in fulfillment of SB 375.
● Lifeline Transportation Program. Funds offered by MTC for projects that are identified through a collaborative, inclusive, community-driven process, and that address transportation gaps and barriers identified in Community Based Transportation Plans or other local planning efforts in low-income neighborhoods. ● One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG) . These grants are awarded to transit-oriented development projects located in Priority Development Areas—areas targeted for compact growth identified in Plan Bay Area (MTC’s SCS). Priority is given to cities and counties that have been proactive in creating more housing and who have accepted a proportionally higher allocation of housing units through the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process. ● Caltrans Active Transportation, Complete Streets, and Safe Routes to School Programs. Active Transportation grants fund transportation improvements that foster healthy activity, namely walking and biking. Complete Streets grants improve sidewalks and curbs that connect to important destinations.

Safe Routes to School grants fund projects that provide safe walking and biking routes between neighborhoods and local schools.
● Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Grants . BAAQMD offers a variety of funding sources for projects that reduce air pollution in the Bay Area, like their Carl Moyer Program, which provides grants to replace or upgrade heavy-duty diesel vehicles. ■ Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). HSIP offers grants for local roadway infrastructure projects with demonstrated crash reduction potential, located in areas with high crash rates or at high risk of crashes. ■ FHWA Accelerating Safety Activities Program (ASAP). Funds demonstration projects less than $20,000 in FHWA Safety Focus states (CA is a bicycle and pedestrian focus state). ■ MTC Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA3) Local Transportation Fund. Fifty-percent match for planning and education projects only: Bicycle and pedestrian design and construction; bicycle and pedestrian education programs; comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans.
■ Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC). These funds are intended to support local efforts to achieve more compact, mixed-use development, and development that is pedestrian-friendly or linked into the overall transit system. ■ California Air Resources Board (CARB) Sustainable Transportation Equity Project (STEP). This program launched in 2020 that funds transportation and planning projects that reduce GHG emissions in California. ■ Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and People with Disabilities Program. Funds projects that improve mobility for seniors and people with disabilities by identifying and removing barriers and improving transportation services like paratransit. This project is part of the FAST Act of 2015.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 57
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County ■ Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grants. Federal Highway Administration grants to fund projects that are meant to significantly reduce traffic fatalities on public roads. The HSIP program is a part of the 2015 FAST Act. ■ Regional Surface Transportation Block Grant. Grants provided by the FTA to states and localities for different transportation projects, including highway improvements, bridge or tunnel projects on public roads, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects.
■ Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program. San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA)-administered grants for new capital infrastructure based on readiness and need, effectiveness, policy consistency, sustainability, and funding leverage.
■ Measure W Pedestrian and Bicycle Program. 2019 SMCTA-administered grants to fund local street repair, grade separations for Caltrain tracks that intersect local streets, expanded bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and improved transit connections.

5.1.4 Ease of Implementation
Numerous factors influence the ease or difficulty of initiating, completing, and putting a project into action. While a recommended project or program may align with community priorities, likely benefit many and appear a candidate for funding, assessing the challenges of implementation remains critical. Determining that the challenges of implementation of a single project are significant, facilitates the identification of other, more implementable projects that achieve the same benefits.

Factors used to assess the ease of implementation of recommendations include:
■ Required cross-agency coordination (more than one agency involvement adds complexity and time to projects)
■ Cross-jurisdictional physical footprint (multiple jurisdictions means more effort and time to be approved)
■ Engineering complexity (cost and schedule implications arise from more complicated projects) ■ Lack of technological “future proofing;” (the potential that a project will become obsolete due to new technologies).

5.2 Evaluation Process
As noted, the evaluation criteria outlined in Section 5.2 were developed in consultation with the AG and MTC and then applied to candidate projects. This was part of a larger evaluation process that included the following steps:

1. Developed lists of potential projects and plans directly from community members during the outreach process. Not all qualitative community feedback collected during the outreach process, including comment responses, map-based inputs, and written survey responses (see Appendix B), translated directly into the lists of recommended projects and plans in this CBTP.

2. Worked with the AG to develop the evaluation criteria outlined in Section 5.2.

3. Applied the four criteria to potential projects and plans, including:
● Assessment of candidate projects against existing mobility plans to identify those supportive of relevant mobility goals or redundant with implemented projects.
● Assessment of the feasibility of candidate projects in terms of required agency coordination, funding potential, and historic implementation challenges.

4. Distributed an initial version of the ranked recommended projects to the AG for review and revision.

5. Revised and finalized priority projects and plans based on comments of the AG.

5.2.1 Criteria Scoring Categories
Recommendations were scored one through five for each evaluation criterion. A score of one reflects the lowest potential for fulfillment of that category; five the highest. For all project and plans, the following score averages were calculated:
■ Average Score: The average score of Criteria 1 through 4. ■ Area Need Score: The average score of Criterion 1 (Reflects Community Priorities) and Criterion 2 (Increases Access) ■ Project Potential Score: The average score of Criterion 3 (Financial Feasibility) and Criterion 4 (Ease of Implementation)

58 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County The four criteria were organized into the above two scores to improve the implementability of the CBTP as a whole. Identifying those recommendations with the highest and/or most immediate potential to get funded and built will support the grant selection, timing and planning processes. It will facilitate improved, more informed decision-making, and/or awareness of potential challenges in the future.

5.2.2 Implementation TimeFrame
Each of the following recommendations is assigned one the following three implementation timeframes based on community priority:

1. Short Term (ST). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in one to three years.

2. Medium Term (MT). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in three to eight years.

3. Long Term (LT). These recommendations are assumed to be implemented in eight or more years.

5.2.3 Project Types
After review of all proposed projects and programs, we found that recommendations fall within the following three types of projects and plans:

1. Active Transportation. These projects are generally new and improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities and micromobility programs. Examples include separated bike paths and cycle tracks, intersection signalization improvements, sidewalk audit and repair programs and bike storage at important destinations like transit hubs. Micromobility refers to the use of individual, lightweight vehicles, such as bikeshares and e-scooters, typically over short distances.

2. Transit and Paratransit. These projects may include new routes, expanding operating hours of certain lines, increasing transit line frequency, or improving transit stops with lighting, shelter, and seating.

3. Safety. Safety projects decrease danger and potential for harm for all residents EPCs. Examples of safety projects include improvements to school access and student safety, traffic calming on streets with high rates of pedestrians, neighborhood lighting improvements and poorly-secured transit facilities.

5.3 Recommended Projects and Plans
According to a CBTP program evaluation performed by MTC in 2022, overly-general CBTP recommendations developed without input from cities have historically faced implementation challenges.1
The following section includes tables of all recommended projects and plans across the three categories for the Daly City CBTP study area. The recommendations generally reflect location- , route- or resource- specific barriers rather systemwide or topical improvements.

In each table, the average score, area need score and project potential score are shown for recommendations, as well as the estimated cost. All recommendations presented in this Plan are considered viable options that reflect community priorities.

5.3.1 Active Transportation Projects and Plans
Only about 17 percent of CBTP transportation survey responders ride a bike “On Occasion” or more often, while about 97 percent walk the same amount. The majority of the following 11 prioritized projects and plans, which are shown in descending order of average score, are pedestrian -oriented improvements along major thoroughfares and intersections. Protected bike and pedestrian facilities are also represented, which is consistent with the fact that survey responders’ identified “Lack of bike lanes” and “Dangerous streets and intersections” as the two most common barriers to getting around by bike. The projects in Table 5-1 were identified by the community, in current studies and during AG review and coordination. Funding for active transportation and multi-modal safety remains available in the wake of COVID-19 mobility changes.
1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments, Community-Based Transportation. Planning (CBTP) Program Evaluation, April 8, 2022.

Table 5-1 Recommended Active Transportation Projects and Plans Recommendation Average
Score
Area
Need
Score
Project
Potential
Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Study potential alternatives for high-visibility crosswalks at the intersection of Serramonte Boulevard and Highway 1 ramps. 4.25 4.5 4 $30,000 ST Daly City
Improve Daly City BART Station access for pedestrians travelling eastbound on John Daly Boulevard with improved markings, signalization and directional signage at the intersection of John Daly Boulevard and Niantic Avenue, consistent with 2020 City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 4 4.5 3.5 $1M ST Daly City
and BART
Create a more pedestrian-safe Geneva Avenue: Install crosswalks with curb extensions at Allan St and Talbert Street 3.75 4 3.5 $65,000 ST Daly City Install Class IV bikeway on State Route 82 in unincorporated Colma, per Unincorporated San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan. 3.5 5 2 $8M to $24M MT San Mateo County Install signage and pavement markings to better designate existing Class II bike lanes on Geneva Avenue between Santos Street and Bayshore Boulevard. 3.5 3 4 $35,000 ST Daly City Improve the intersection of Mission Street / E. Market Street / San Pedro Road with a pedestrian island and high-visibility or "3D" crosswalks. 3.5 3.5 3.5 $38,000 ST Caltrans/Daly City Study bicycle and pedestrian network conditions and conflicts within ½ mile of the Daly City and Colma BART Stations. Include recommendations for active transportation network improvements, infrastructure projects and micromobility programs designed to increase bike/ped safety and close “first-mile-last-mile” gaps.

3.5 4 3 $275,000 ST

C/CAG, SMC
Transportation Agency
Perform a feasibility study of a ped/bike pathway from the terminus of Reiner Street in unincorporated Colma to the Colma BART station, on unimproved land beyond the soundwall adjacent to the Station. 3.5 4 3 $275,000 ST San Mateo
County, Daly
City, BART
Develop a micromobility implementation guidebook for local jurisdictions to support efficient roll-out of bikeshare, e-scooter and other micromobility programs. The guidebook should include a framework for:
• Engaging community members to get input on preferred micromobility programs. • Identifying type(s) of micromobility program(s) for maximum community benefit. • Locating micromobility vehicle access and parking areas. • Designing safe and accessible micromobility routes that close “first-mile-last-mile” transit gaps. • Contracting with third party vendors.

3.5 3.5 3.5 $325,000 ST C/CAG
Improve access to electronic bikes via equity programs for both shared e-bikes and individually owned e-bikes. 3.5 3.5 3.5 $50,000 to $500,000 MT
C/CAG, San
Mateo County
Daly City
Study the repurposing of Hillside Boulevard in Unincorporated Colma into a Class IV bikeway. 3.25 3.5 3 $275,000 MT San Mateo County
Increase number of bike lockers at Colma BART station from eight to 20, consistent with Daly City BART Station. 3.25 2.5 4 $30,000 LT BART Study the development of a Class IV bikeway (per Unincorporated San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan) and series of safer pedestrian crossings on Hillside Blvd. in Unincorporated Colma 3.25 2.5 4 $75,000 LT San Mateo
County, Daly
City
Install Class III bike route on Mission Street from Westake Avenue to San Pedro Road, per 2020 City of Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 3 3.5 2.5 $1.2M LT Caltrans

60 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

5.3.2 Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans
Equity Priority Communities have remained disproportionally reliant on transit service, as compared to other communities, during the pandemic. While station entries across the BART system dropped 87 percent from September 2019 to September 2020, drops were uneven from station to station. Ridership at Orinda Station, where 72 percent of the population is white, saw a 94 percent drop in ridership. In comparison, Colma Station, located where 36 percent of the population is Black or Latinx, saw an 86 percent drop in year over year ridership.2
Accessible public transit remains a mobility backbone for EPC communities. This was borne out in the Daly City outreach process, during which low-income, youth and elderly residents identified area-wide and route-specific gaps, improved information campaigns and bus stop upgrades as needed community improvements. 2 Bay Area Council Economic Institute, September 2020, Economic Profile 2020: Housing and Transportation in a PostPandemic Bay Area, http://www.bayareaeconomy.org/report/housing-and-transportation-in-a-post-pandemic-bay-area/, accessed November 9, 2020.

Both SamTrans and BART were implementing major improvement plans in 2022, including BART’s Measure RR rebuilding program and the June adoption of final new Reimagine SamTrans projects by the SamTrans’ Board of Directors. It should be noted that the following route changes identified in the CBTP process have not been included in the following list of recommendations because they have been adopted as separate Reimagine SamTrans projects:
■ Increase weekday and weekend frequencies of SamTrans Route 110. ● Reimagine SamTrans Route 110 Alternative 1: Increase frequency of Route 110 to 30-minute headways on weekdays and weekends.
■ Increase weekday, weekend and evening frequencies of SamTrans Route 120. ● Reimagine SamTrans Route 120 Alternative 1: Increasing frequency of Route 210 to 10-minute headways between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m.; 15-minute headways on weekdays and weekends; and double evening service levels seven days a week
■ Improve routing and speed of SamTrans Route 121 from Daly City BART Station ● Reimagine SamTrans Route 121 Alternative 1: Reduce route duplication with Routes 130 and 122 and reduce travel times between Daly City BART and Seton Medical Center and Skyline College.

The 10 projects and plans in Table 5-2 are listed in descending order of average score. The recommendations indicate community preference for increased crosstown and San Francisco-based bus routes, the desire for a more robust program of transit options in Bayshore, and improved bus shelters near popular shopping and resources. The projects were identified by the community, in current studies and during AG review and coordination.

Table 5-2 Recommended Transit and Paratransit Projects and Plans Recommendation Average
Score
Area Need
Score
Project
Potential
Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Broaden multi-lingual information and awareness campaign of Clipper START program to include transit stops, stations and high-activity destinations in Equity Priority Communities. 4.25 3.5 5 $75,000 ST MTC Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 110 bus stop at Southgate Ave and Westmoor Avenue, near Ranch 99 Market at 250 Skyline Plaza, Daly City, CA 94015
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 122 bus stop at Callan Street and King Drive, near Manilla Oriental Market at 950 King Drive Suite 112, Daly City, CA 94015
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route 130 bus stops on Hillsdale Boulevard between Gambetta Street and Bismark Street, near Mission Plaza at 6843 Mission St, Daly City, CA 94014
4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Add NACTO and ADA compliant bus shelters at the following stops of the following SamTrans route to improve access to neighborhood supermarket:
• Route ECR bus stops at Mission Street/Eastlake Avenue and Mission Street/Parkview Avenue, near MidCity Market at 6718 Mission St, Daly City, CA 94014 4 4 4
$20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
ST SamTrans,
Daly City
Implement a 2022 San Mateo County Paratransit Rider’s Guide "How-to Tour." Introduce tour-goers at senior centers, medical facilities and social service organizations to the basics of paratransit eligibility, sign-up, routing and ride process.

3.75 4 3 $70,000 to
$120,000 MT
San Mateo
County,
SamTrans,
Daly City
Develop implementation strategies for equity mobility programs that encourage mode shift, such as the 2021 101 Express Lanes Community Benefits Program. 3.75 4 3 $20,000 to $35,000 MT C/CAG,
San Mateo
County, Daly
City
Increase the frequency of the City of Daly City’s Bayshore Shuttle to include limited weekend service. 3.75 5 2.5 $600,000
to $1M
annually
MT Daly City
Install NACTO and ADA compliant bus stops along SamTrans Route 130. 3.75 3 4.5 $20,000 to
$30,000
per stop
MT SamTrans
Program a new Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy SamTrans route connecting Bayshore and Serramonte. 3.5 4 2.5 $1.5M
to $3M
start-up
LT SamTrans

62 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County

5.3.3 Safety Projects and Plans
The five projects and plans in Table 5-3 are listed in descending order of average score. These projects do not include non-schools related pedestrian or bicycle safety improvements, which are categorized as Active Transportation projects. Most of the recommendations are the result of community feedback collected from families and various school district volunteers at the Bayshore Block Party. The “overflow” impact of racing events held at the Cow Palace on the safety of surrounding roads was a common topic. A review of the Porsche Club of America website showed that four racing events were scheduled in the Cow Palace parking lot from April to August of 2022.3
Return to in-school learning following pandemic-related school closures during the entire 2020-21 school year, and part of the 2021-22 school year, refocused communities on school safety. Discussions with representatives from Bayshore Unified School District and Jefferson Unified School District highlighted the need for improve safety infrastructure at several school in the CBTP study area. Moreover, about 15 percent of survey responders identified schools as a “place that is hard to get to each day.”

5.4 Evaluation and Monitoring
This CBTP update contains a diverse list of recommended projects, including capital improvements, programmatic studies, and informational campaigns. Each of these is associated with a unique set of funding challenges and opportunities. The manner in which the projects are integrated into local programming also differs, whether via inclusion in a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or adoption as local policy. Limited staff resources and multijurisdictional coordination are historic challenges to CBTP progress across the project spectrum.

Implementation of this Plan will require ongoing commitment by Daly City and partner agencies to move recommendations forward. Success will also depend on the ability of C/CAG to regularly monitor CBTP progress, maintain a record of project milestones, and offer support to responsible agencies.
3 Porsche Club of America website, Autocross, https://pca-ggr.org/autocross/, accessed August 12, 2022.

In order to facilitate monitoring by C/CAG, this CBTP contains an Annual CBTP Tracking Checklist (Appendix A) to be completed by Daly City each year (beginning with adoption date of the CBTP) and submitted to C/CAG. The Checklist will help:
■ Facilitate communication between Daly City and C/CAG. ■ Document individual project progress.
■ Tally all “In Progress” CBTP projects.
■ Evaluate overall CBTP implementation.

As shown in Appendix A, the Checklist begins with a summary of total recommendations in the CBTP. It allows staff to list all CBTP projects for which one or more milestones have been reached, “check” the category of each milestone, and briefly describe and date the milestone. The three categories of milestones are:

1. Funding: Examples of these milestones include grant submissions, receipt or allocation of funds, completion of detailed expenditure plans and others.

2. Local Adoption/Programming. Examples of these milestones include the addition of project(s) into a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) or budgetary document, formalization of a project as policy or action in a local planning document and others.

3. Implementation. These are milestones representative of upcoming or ongoing use of project funds, such as RFP release; execution of outside contracts; and project kick-off, internal milestones and completion.

The Checklist closes with a tally of the total number of projects tracked for the year.

Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan 63
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Table 5-3 Recommended Safety Projects and Plans
Recommendation Average
Score
Area
Need Score
Project
Potential Score
Estimated
Cost
Implementation
Timeframe
Responsible
Agency
Install curb extensions at intersections on community-identified informal “racetracks” on the following Bayshore neighborhood rights-of-way:
● Entire length of Ottilia Street
● Entire length of Partridge Street
● Accacia Street from Geneva Avenue to Bay Ridge Drive

4.25 4.5 4 $1.5M to $2M ST Daly City
Implement Safe Routes to School infrastructure, including traffic calming techniques such as lane narrowing, bulb-outs, and rapid flashing beacons at:
● Bayshore Elementary School
● Thornton High School
● Daniel Webster Elementary
● Westlake Elementary School
● Jefferson High School

3.75 4 3.5
$300,000 to
$600,000 per
school
ST
Daly City,
Bayshore
Elementary
Unified School
District,
Jefferson
Elementary
School District,
Jefferson Union
High School
District
Execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
Daly City leadership and Cow Palace Board of Directors (State of California Department of Food and Agriculture’s division of Fairs and Expositions) to develop a community-sensitive event scheduling and safety campaign.

3.25 3.5 3 $15,000 MT Daly City, State
of California
Improve lighting at loading areas, bus bays and areas between the station footprint and loading area and bus bays, at Colma BART Station.
3 2.5 3.5 $400,000 to
$700,000 MT BART

64 Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County This page intentionally left blank.

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX A

A NNUAL CBTP T RACKING

C HECKLIST

........................................................................................................................

Daly City CBTP Annual Tracking Checklist
CBTP Adoption Date:

Number of Active Transportation Projects: 14
Tracking Start Date:

Number of Transit and Paratransit Projects: 10
Number of Safety Projects: 4
Tracking End Date:

Total Number of Recommended Projects: 28
Project Milestones
Project Name
(Projects may be repeated to accommodate
multiple milestones)
Category (Check 1 for each row)
Milestone Description and Date
Funding Local Adoption/
Programming Implementation
Total Projects Currently Tracked:

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX B

C OMMUNITY N EEDS A SSESSMENT

........................................................................................................................

PLACEWORKS 1
Daly City CBTP Community Needs Assessment

INTRODUCTION
This report documents existing demographic and transportation conditions in transportation-challenged communities in and near Daly City. The information will inform the Daly City Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) to be prepared by the San Mateo City/County Council of Governments (C/CAG).

CBTPS AND THE LIFELINE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
In 2001, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) concluded that community-oriented planning was required to address the travel needs of residents in low-income Bay Area neighborhoods.

MTC implemented two complimentary programs designed to allocate funding for transportation improvement projects based on intensive outreach to low-income communities.

The goal of the CBTP program is to improve mobility in “Communities of Concern” (COC). These are neighborhoods defined by a series of census tract-level factors that increase susceptibility to transportation access gaps. These factors include high rates of minorities, low-income residents, seniors, and lack of car ownership. Per MTC guidelines, CBTPs require a diverse outreach plan to multiple community stakeholders, as well as ongoing coordination with local advisory committees.

CBTPs facilitate the identification of projects that are eligible for funding under the Lifeline Transportation Program (LTP). The LTP was designed to fund projects that result in improved mobility for low-income and other challenged communities. Per its 2018 guidelines, projects that are eligible for funding by the LTP must:
 Be developed through an inclusive planning process that engages a broad range of stakeholders.  Improve a range of transportation choices by adding new or expanded services.  Address transportation gaps and/or barriers identified in CBTPs or other substantive local planning efforts involving focused outreach to low-income populations.

The Daly City CBTP will include a series of project and program recommendations developed according to the program outreach guidelines, and consistent with the funding requirements established in the LTP.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2 DECEMBER 2019
2008 BAYSHORE CBTP
The most recent CBTP for the Daly City area was adopted in 2008. The 2008 Bayshore CBTP included a study area comprised of a single census tract in northeast Daly City. The northern boundary of the study area shares the northern boundary of San Mateo County line, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 2008 Bayshore CBTP Study Area
The 2008 Bayshore CBTP recommended a series of operations-based and capital programs for improved mobility in the community. The degree to which these recommendations have been implemented and the resulting lessons learned for the current CBTP are discussed in the 2008 CBTP Implementation Status section at the end of this document.

Significant changes in demographics, land use and transit options have occurred in the last 11 years, prompting initiation of the current Daly City CBTP and revised Study Area.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 3

CURRENT DALY CITY CBTP STUDY AREA
The Daly City CBTP study area (herein referred to as “study area”) is delineated by the red dashed line in Figure 2. The study area has been determined by the location of four separate COCs distributed across Daly City. These COCs, each a single census tract, include:
 Northwest COC. This COC is located just south of John Daly Boulevard, at the intersection of Interstate 280. It partially surrounds the Lake Merced Golf Club to the north and west.  Northeast COC. This census tract is in the Bayshore neighborhood of Daly City. It comprised the 2008 Bayshore CBTP study area. It is in the eastern portion of the City and, as shown in Figure 2, shares its northern boundary with San Francisco County.
 Central COC. This tract is located immediately east of Interstate 280. Mission Street and East Market Street intersect here, and the Colma BART Station is also located within the tract. This is the only COC that includes an unincorporated area of San Mateo County.  Southern COC. As evident in Figure 2, this tract includes the area North of Hwy 1 and east of St.

Francis Boulevard, as well as a larger area southeast of the intersection of Hwy 1 and Skyline Boulevard/SR 35.

The demographic information in this report reflects conditions within the four COC census tracts, not the entire study area. This is consistent with the CBTP guidelines. However, the community focus, reliance on outreach, and potential transportation solutions that result from the CBTP will not be limited to these isolated census tracts. Broader focus on the study area shown in Figure 2 will facilitate the development of projects and plans that provide connectivity, fill transit gaps and include full communities.

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
This demographic profile compares census tract data from previous and current U.S. Census and American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2006-2010 and 2013-2017) to show trends since the last CBTP. In addition, future projections are provided from the 2017 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which MTC published in July 2017. Also known as Plan Bay Area (PBA) 2040, this RTP contains forecasts for population, housing, and employment for the horizon year of 2040. For purposes of this analysis, data shown for the study area is limited to the census tracts that make up the COCs shown in Figure 2.

TOTAL POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD SIZE
According to the 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates, the population of the study area in 2017 was approximately 25,533, having grown 8 percent from 2010, when the population was 23,653. This growth rate is similar to growth experienced over the past seven years in San Mateo County overall, where the population grew about 9 percent during the same time period, from 704,327 to 767,450 residents. The population of the study area is predicted to increase 25 percent through 2040, to 31,855 residents. This is slightly higher than the county, which is expected to grow by 19 percent from 2017 to 2040, to a population of 916,590.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
4 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Gull Dr
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Pacific
Ocean
Stu
Co
Da
Oth
Sa
I2 BA
I2 Ca
Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
Daly City CBTP Study Area

PLACEWORKS
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY
3rd St
San Jose
Ave
Geneva Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd
Southhill Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Junipero Serra Blvd
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
Bay Shore Blvd
Study Area
Communities of Concern
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions
San Mateo County
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Æþ101
%&'(280
Figure 2
CBTP Study Area
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 Scale (Miles)
1 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
6 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 7
Average household size in the study area in 2017 was 3.17 persons, which is about 9 percent larger than San Mateo County overall, at 2.88 persons. This statistic has shown to be relatively stable in the study area, having decreased less than 1 percent since 2010. Average household size has increased 5 percent in San Mateo County during the same timeframe, from 2.72 persons in 2010. By 2040, household size in the study area is expected to 3.36 people per household and will be 18 percent higher than the rest of the county, which is projected to remain stable at 2.84 persons people per household.

RACE AND ETHNICITY
The study area contains higher percentages of Asian, Hispanic or Latino, and Black or African American, residents compared to San Mateo County, while having approximately a quarter of the percentage of white residents compared to the County (Table 1). According to 2013–2017 ACS 5-year estimates, 10 percent of study area residents were white non-Hispanic or Latino compared to 40 percent countywide.

The Black or African American population is approximately 5 percent, compared to 2 percent countywide. 30 percent of the study area population is Hispanic or Latino compared to approximately 25 percent in the County.

Table 1: Race and Ethnicity
2017 ACS % of Population
Race Category Study Area San Mateo County
White 10% 40%
Black or African American 5% 2%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0% <1%
Asian 51% 27%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2% 1%
Other <1% <1%
Two or More Races 2% 4%
Hispanic or Latino 30% 25%
Total 100% 100%
Source: US Census 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
8 DECEMBER 2019

AGE DISTRIBUTION
Seniors
According to 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates and shown in Figure 3, the senior population (65 years of age and older) in the study area is at least 11 percent of the area’s total population in all four separate COCs. The northeast and southern COCs both have a higher percentage of seniors, constituting between 13 to 18 percent of the area’s total population. The study area-wide rate of seniors is significantly lower than that of San Mateo County, where 15 percent of the total population is 65 and older.

Youth
The average population of residents under 18 years of age across the four COCs is about 20 percent. As shown in Figure 4, the COCs have varying rates of young people. The central COC, containing the Colma BART station, has the highest percentage of youth with approximately 25 to 28 percent of the population under 18 years of age. In comparison, the COC located in the northwest portion of the study area, adjacent Lake Merced Golf Club, has a youth population of about half that, comprising approximately 11 to 16 percent of the total population. The other two COCs have relatively moderate populations under 18 years of age, each with approximately 17 to 20 percent youth. The average rate of young people in the CBTP study area is close to that of San Mateo County, where 21 percent of the total population is under 18 years old.

DISABLED POPULATIONS
Percent disabled population is one of seven tract-level variables that, when paired with a high rate of lowincome households, may factor into the establishment of a COC, per MTC guidelines. The following discussion includes rates of both physical disabilities as well as sensory disabilities such as visual and hearing impairment.

Physical Disability
As shown in Figure 5, the rate of individuals with physical disabilities, defined as those that restrict full motor capacity, is largely consistent across the study area. In three of the four COCs, about 8 to 9 percent of individuals are restricted by a physical disability. That number is slightly less in the southern census tract, where the rate is 6 to 7 percent.

The rate of physical disabilities countywide, at about 5 percent, is less than all COCs in the study area.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population Age 65 Years and Over
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stu
Percentage
Per Census T
11%
13%
San Mateo
Inc
Un
I2 BA
I2 Ca
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percentage of Seniors (65 or Older)
Per Census Tract
11% - 12%
13% - 18%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 3
Population Age 65 and Older
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population Under 18 Years of Age
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stu
Percentage
Per Census Tr
11%
17%
25%
San Mateo C
Inco
Uni
I2 BA
I2 Cal
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percentage of Youth (Under Age 18)
Per Census Tract
11% - 16%
17% - 20%
25% - 28%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 4
Population Age 18 years and Younger
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 11
Sensory Disability
According to 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates, rates of hearing or visually impaired individuals in the Daly City study area are relatively low. The central and northeast COCs contain higher rates of people with sensory disabilities, at about 4 to 5 percent of the population, than the other two COCs. As shown in Figure 6, the southern COC has the lowest rate of sensory disabilities, at approximately 2.1 to 3 percent.

The rate of sensory disabilities countywide, at about 4 percent, is similar to the central and northeast COCs.

LANGUAGE LIMITATIONS
On average, the four census tracts in the Daly City CBTP study area struggle with double the rate of limited English proficiency than the countywide population. As shown in the Figure 7 bar chart, below, approximately 18 percent of total households in the study area are designated as “Limited EnglishSpeaking Households”. These are households in which all members 14 years and over speak a non-English language, with varying degrees of difficulty with English. This is compared to the countywide rate of 9 percent of total households.

The rate of non-English speaking households is higher than the countywide rate in all four COCs in the study area. However, the northeastern and southern COCs have higher incidences of non-English speaking households than the other two COCs, at 23 percent and 19 percent, respectively.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
12 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Physical Disabilities
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stud
Percentage o
Disabilities
Per Census T

6.1%

8.1%
San Mateo C
Inco
Unin
I2 BAR
I2 Calt
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percentage of People with Physical
Disabilities
Per Census Tract

6.1% - 7%

8.1% - 9%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 5
Percent of Population with Physical Disability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Percentage of Population with Sensory Disability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stud
Percentage o
Disabilities (
Per Census Tra

2.1%

3.1%

4.1%
San Mateo C
Inco
Unin
I2 BAR
I2 Calt
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percentage of People with Sensory
Disabilities (Hearing and Visual)
Per Census Tract

2.1% - 3%

3.1% - 4%

4.1% - 5%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 6
Percent of Population with Sensory Disability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 15
Figure 7 Limited English Proficiency, CBTP Study Area and San Mateo County Source: 2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates (2013-2017).

POVERTY STATUS
The U.S. Census Bureau uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine the population living in poverty. If a family’s total income is less than the poverty threshold, then that family and every individual in it is considered to be living in poverty. To reflect high living costs and wages in the Bay Area, the poverty threshold used in the CBTP analysis is 200 percent of the federal poverty threshold. These 200 percent thresholds for the 2013- 2017 ACS 5-year estimates range from $31,754 for a family of two to $101,362 for the largest families (nine people or more).

According to 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates, approximately 33 percent of all residents in the four COCs were living in poverty. This figure is significant when compared to San Mateo County as a whole, where 19 percent of residents live in poverty. Figure 8 shows the percent of population in poverty for each census tract in the study area, based on the 200 percent of federal poverty threshold. The northeast COC has the highest percentage, with approximately 36 to 45 percent of residents living in poverty. Both the central and southern COCs have between 31 to 35 percent of residents living in poverty, while the northeastern COC has the lowest incidence, with impoverished residents comprising 25 to 30 percent of the population.

18%
9%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
CBTP Area San Mateo County

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
16 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Population in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty Level)
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stud
Percent Pop
200 Percent
Per Census Tra
25%
31%
36%
San Mateo C
Inco
Unin
I2 BAR
I2 Calt
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percent Population with Income Below
200 Percent of Poverty Level
Per Census Tract
25% - 30%
31% - 35%
36% - 45%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 8
Population in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty Level)
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
18 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 19

MOBILITY CHARACTERISTICS

VEHICLE AVAILABILITY
Rates of household car ownership in Daly City COCs are significantly less than in San Mateo County as a whole. As illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, four times the number of households in the study area, as compared to the county, are without a private vehicle. The percentage of households with two vehicles is also lower, at 60 percent compared to 79 percent countywide. In addition, there are far more households with just one vehicle in the study area than there are in the county.

Figure 11 shows households with no vehicle available by census tract for the study area. The northwest and central COCs have some of the highest concentrations of households without vehicles. The northeast COC has the lowest percentage of households with no vehicles, between 3 to 5 percent. This is similar to countywide vehicle availability.

Figure 9 Household Vehicle Availability in CBTP Study Area

Figure 10 Household Vehicle Availability Countywide

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
20 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Household Vehicle Availability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stud
Percentage o
Vehicles
Per Census Tra
3% -
6% -
9% -
12%
San Mateo C
Inco
Unin
I2 BAR
I2 Calt
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Percentage of Households with No
Vehicles
Per Census Tract
3% - 5%
6% - 8%
9% - 11%
12% - 29%
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 11
Household Vehicle Availability
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
22 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 23

TRAVEL PATTERNS
Commute Mode
Commute mode in the study area varies considerably from San Mateo County, as shown in Table 2. More than double the population in the study area takes public transportation to work compared to the county population, with 23 percent of residents in the Daly City CBTP taking transit versus 10 percent of county residents. Furthermore, fewer residents in the study area drive alone to work than residents in the county (56 percent compared to 69 percent), but slightly more residents in the study area carpool (13 percent compared to 10 percent). The northwest COC has the highest number of residents commuting without a car, with approximately 30 percent taking public transit and 9 percent walking. The southern and northeast COCs have the lowest rate of public transportation use (about 18 percent each), but the southern COC has a slightly higher incidence of walking and working from home than the eastern COC.

Table 2 Means of Travel to Work
2017 ACS (% of Total)
Means of Transportation to Work Study Area San Mateo County Car, Truck or Van 69% 79%
Drove Alone 56% 69%
Carpooled 13% 10%
Public Transportation 23% 10%
Bicycle <1% 1%
Walk 4% 3%
Other 2% 1%
Worked at Home 2% 5%
Total Workers 16 and Over 100% 100%
Source: 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.

Commute Travel Time
Commuters in the Daly City CBTP study area do not typica lly commute more than 30 minutes each way, on average. As shown in Figure 12, three of the four COCs have an average commute time between 28 and 32 minutes. The southwest tract has a slightly lower average commute time, ranging from 25 to 27 minutes to work. The study area average of a 29.5-minute commute is close to the countywide average of

28.2 minutes.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
24 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Long Distance Commute
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
Stu
Mean Trave
Per Census T
25 28
San Mateo
Inc
Un
I2 BA
I2 Ca
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Æþ101
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Stti
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Mean Travel Time to Work (minutes)
Per Census Tract
25 - 27 mins
28 - 32 mins
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 12
Travel Time to Work
Source: US Census 2013-2017 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
26 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 27

EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
The following sections describe existing mobility services and infrastructure in the study area and summarizes gaps in the transportation network, as identified in relevant countywide and local plans.

There are multiple transit options in the Daly City study area. The area is served by bus and rail systems managed by numerous agencies. Some transit options serve Daly City COCs directly, others serve the larger CBTP study area.

The existing transportation network in the Daly City CBTP study area is illustrated in Figure 13.

RAIL LINES (BART, CALTRAIN)
BART operates seven routes connecting four counties: Contra Costa, Alameda, San Francisco, and San Mateo, with service extending to Antioch, Richmond, Dublin/Pleasanton, Warm Springs/South Fremont, and Millbrae. Regional rail service in the study area is provided by the Richmond-Millbrae, AntiochMillbrae, Daly City-Dublin/Pleasanton and Daly City-Warm Springs/South Fremont BART lines. As shown in Figure 13, there are two BART Stations in the study area. The Daly City BART Station is located just south of the San Francisco County line and the Colma BART Station is located within the central COC. The Bayshore Caltrain station is located at the far northeastern portion of the study area, east of the Bayshore COC. Caltrain provides regional connectivity from Downtown San Francisco, through San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties to the City of Gilroy.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
28 DECEMBER 2019

BUS ROUTES
As shown on Figure 13 and listed in Table 3, below, the CBTP study area is served primarily by bus routes managed by the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans). Two San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (MUNI) routes also serve the northern portion of the study area. MUNI routes are limited to service on Geneva Avenue in the northeast (Bayshore) COC and the area immediately surrounding the Daly City BART Station. The northeast COC is served by no other direct bus routes beyond this minimal MUNI service, and transit connections from this COC to the other three are lacking.

Table 3 Fixed-Route Bus Routes in Study Area
Transit Route Route Description
SamTrans
ERC Central Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART and Caltrain Stations Rapid Central Community of Concern; SamTrans Limited Stop Route 130 Central Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations 24 Central Community of Concern, eastern Community of Concern, and southern Community of Concern; SamTrans School-day Only Route
118 Central Community of Concern and southern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations
121 Central Community of Concern and southern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations
38 Central Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations 397 Eastern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART and Caltrain Stations 292 Eastern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to Caltrain Stations 29 Eastern Community of Concern; SamTrans School-day Only Route 120 Southern Community of Concern and northwestern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations
16 Southern Community of Concern; SamTrans School-day Only Route 112 Southern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations 122 Northwestern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations 110 Northwestern Community of Concern; SamTrans Route connecting to BART Stations SFMTA
9 Eastern Community of Concern; MUNI Metro Rail
9R Eastern Community of Concern; MUNI Rapid Bus
8AX Bayshore A Express Route
Source: SamTrans, 2018; SFMTA, 2018.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Grandview Dr
Railroad Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden
Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Public Transportation
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
St
C
B
I2 BA
I2 C
BA
C
S
S
San Mateo
In
U
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Capitol Ave
Southgate Ave
E Market St
Gilman Ave
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Skyline D
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Communities of Concern
Bus Stops
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
BART
Caltrain
SamTrans Routes
SF Municipal Transportation Agency
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
Figure 13
Existing Transportation System
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
30 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 31

PARATRANSIT
SamTrans Redi-Wheels
The entire Daly City CBTP study area is served by SamTrans’ Redi-Wheels paratransit service, which covers the Bayside of San Mateo County and Pacifica. According to SamTrans’ San Mateo County Paratransit Rider’s Guide, eligibility for the service is based on those with disabilities who are unable to use regular, accessible fixed-route transit service. SamTrans conducts in-person evaluations to determine full RediWheels eligibility and issues a Redi-Wheels identification card to those deemed eligible.

Redi-Wheels rides are typically scheduled between one and seven days in advance, or by appointment times at medical and other facilities. Redi-Wheels riders may also schedule transfers to other transit agency routes for travel outside San Mateo County. Paratransit customers may also ride all regularly scheduled SamTrans fixed-route buses for free using their Redi-Wheels identification card.

In addition, Redi-Wheels riders who receive Supplemental Security Income, General Assistance, or MediCal may also be eligible for Redi-Wheels Lifeline, the service’s reduced fare program.

MUNI San Francisco Paratransit
MUNI’s San Francisco Paratransit program is restricted to Daly City’s northern boundary, encompassing a

0.75-mile zone surrounding MUNI routes in Daly City. As a result, it serves the northeast COC only. The program includes the following services:
 SF Access. This is a pre-scheduled, shared ADA-compliant van service providing door-to-door transportation.
 Paratransit Taxi. Paratransit Taxi is a non-ADA compliant ride service that utilizes authorized San Francisco taxis and ramp taxis.
 Group Van. This is a pre-scheduled van service providing door-to-door transportation to groups of ADA eligible riders attending agency programs such as Adult Day Health Care and senior centers.  Van Gogh Shuttle. This is a shuttle service for groups of seniors and/or people with disabilities to attend cultural events in San Francisco. Van Gogh is open to groups of at least seven (7) individuals who are either sixty-five (65) or older, disabled with a Regional Transit Connection (RTC) Discount ID Card; or registered with SF Paratransit.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
32 DECEMBER 2019

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE
Bicycle facilities are described as falling into one of four classes regulated by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans): Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV.  Class I multi-use paths allow bicycle and pedestrian travel in both directions on paved rights of way, completely separated from a road or highway.
 Class II facilities are on-street bicycle lanes that are shared-use and allow for one-way travel in the same direction as vehicle traffic. Class II bicycle lanes are separated from vehicle lanes with striping.  Class III bicycle facilities are shared-use bicycle routes that allow for vehicles and bicycles to share the right of way. Class III bicycle routes typically provide connections between other bikeways or designate preferred bicycle routes along low-stress neighborhood streets.  Class IV bicycle facilities are within or adjacent to a roadway and separated from traffic by a physical barrier such as bollards, on-street parking, or planters. This design allows an exclusive right-of-way for bicycle travel.

The existing and proposed bicycle network for the study area is shown in Figure 14. The existing network includes a mix of bicycle facility types and provides some connectivity with transit.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Constraints
All bicycle routes in the study area are either Class II or III bicycle facilities, apart from the Class I route along John Daly Boulevard at the northern border of the northwest COC. Apart from this Class I route, the CBTP study area is unserved by Class I and bike facilities and dedicated Class IV bicycle infrastructure. Only the western side of the northwest COC is served by bike paths, while the northeast COC is limited to one Class II path on Geneva Boulevard and a single Class III path to the south. Limited bicycle facilities in both these COCs are constraints to access within these neighborhoods. The central COC is the most bikeaccessible tract, with a network of Class III paths running in all directions and a Class II path at the northern border. The southern COC has two Class II bike paths running north-south, including one at its eastern border. The lack of east-west connections here limit neighborhood accessibility for bicyclists.

In addition, as evident in Figure 14, currently proposed bike facilities would provide limited direct service to the COC tracts. Proposed facilities include a Class I facility to the Colma BART Station in the central COC, and a short extension of the existing Class III facility in the northwest COC.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
Miller Ave
Palmetto Ave
Hillside Blvd Ext
Grand Ave
Eccles Ave
Lawndale Blvd
Evergreen Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Oyster Point Blvd
Grandview Dr
Railroad Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Monterey Rd
Capitol Ave
Linden
Ave
Southgate Ave
Del Monte Ave
E Market St
Greendale Dr
Gilman Ave
Gateway Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Airport Blvd
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Gellert Blvd
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
South San Francisco
BART Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
South San Francisco
Caltrain Station
Regional Bicycling Facilities
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; SamTrans, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2019 0 650 1,300 2,600
Feet
S
C
Existing B
C
C
C
Proposed
P
P
P
San Mateo
In
U
I2 B
I2 C
Daly City CBTP
I2
I2
I2
I2
Hillside Bl
d
ndale Blvd
een Dr
Hanover St
Eastmoor Ave
Carter St
Southhill Blvd
Capitol Ave
Southgate Ave
E Market St
Gilman Ave
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Naples St
Visitacion Ave
Jamestown Ave
Mansell St
Skyline Blvd S Skyline Dr
Æþ101
%&'(280
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA
Broadmoor
Daly City BART
Station
Colma BART
Station
Bayshore Caltrain
Station
Study Area
Communities of Concern
Existing Bikeways
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Path
Class III Bike Route
Proposed Bikeways
Proposed Class I Bike Path
Proposed Class II Bike Path
Proposed Class III Bike Route
San Mateo County
Incorporated
Unincorporated
I2 BART Stations
I2 Caltrain Stations
Figure 14
Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network
Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2018; PlaceWorks 2019. 0 Scale (Feet)
2,600

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

D A L Y C I T Y C O M M U N I T Y B A S E D T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N

C I T Y / C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S O F S A N M A T E O

PLACEWORKS

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
34 DECEMBER 2019
This page left intentionally blank.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 35

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS AND PLANNING STUDIES
To better understand the gaps in the CBTP study area transportation network, projects, plans and programs identified in the following policy documents were evaluated:
 SamTrans Strategic Plan
 San Mateo County Senior Mobility Guide
 San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan
 San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan for 2040 Follow Up: Final Action plan  San Mateo County Human Services Agency (HSA) Transportation programs  City of Daly City General Plan
 San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan  San Mateo County Shuttle Program Call for Projects
 San Mateo County Transportation Plan for Low-Income Populations  City of Daly City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

SAMTRANS STRATEGIC PLAN
The SamTrans Strategic Plan (Plan) is a blueprint for SamTrans growth and fiscal policy from 2015 through 2019. The Plan identifies three priorities: expand mobility options for customers, strengthen fiscal health, and become a more effective organization. It includes the following actions to improve service in the general CBTP study area:
 Work with community partners on synergistic land use development policies that support transit investments through the Grand Boulevard Initiative.
 Work with its partners on the Grand Boulevard Initiative to revitalize the El Camino Real corridor and promote transit-oriented development.
 Consider implementing select El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) enhancements as early as 2017.

El Camino Real intersects the central COC, and therefore Issues and improvements to the right-of-way could impact that portion of the CBTP study area. The Strategic Plan also documented early results of the SamTrans Service Plan, which suggest that there is a demand for increased route frequency in the study

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
36 DECEMBER 2019
area. Over the course of one year, weekday ridership increased by 13 percent on Route ERC and by 12 percent on Route 120, both of which serve the study area.

SAN MATEO COUNTY SENIOR MOBILITY GUIDE
The Senior Mobility Guide provides information to help San Mateo County residents remain mobile as they age. It outlines a series of programs provided through a range of agencies in the county, including:
 Bayshore/Brisbane Senior Shuttle: This ride-request service operates during the midday and connects to the Bayshore Caltrain Station. Passengers may call to request a ride within the service area.
 American Cancer Society – Road to Recovery: A program staffed by volunteer drivers who pick up cancer patients at their homes and take them to anything cancer-related, including doctor’s appointments, radiation treatments, and chemotherapy.
 Seton Medical Center (Seton BART Shuttle): This hospital offers limited transportation for patients from Daly City BART to Seton Medical Center.
 Go-Go Grandparent: This nationwide service offers rides 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to all.

Vehicles can transport folding wheelchairs and passengers who are transferable, and fares are quoted based on distance and time traveled.
 Serra Yellow Cab: This program offers dispatch service to/from Daly City, Colma, Brisbane, Pacifica, Broadmoor, Millbrae, Burlingame, Hillsborough, Foster City, Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City and SFO.
 SilverRide: This TNC service is specifically designed to meet the transportation needs of older adults and people with ambulatory or other limitations.
 SamTrans Redi-Wheels: This paratransit service is available for people whose disabilities or health conditions prevent them from using the bus.

SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR 2040
The San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan for 2040 (SMCTP 2040) is a long-range, comprehensive transportation planning document that promotes compatibility among all transportation plans and programs within the county. The SMCTP 2040 outlines transportation issues associated with countywide growth and establishes overall strategies and programs to overcome the challenges.

The SMCTP 2040 includes a list of Proposed Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Projects comprised of longer-term improvements encouraged by the MTC’s twenty-year RTP. Some are located, or indicate potential transportation gaps, in the current study area. These include:
 Mission Street/El Camino Real as part of Grand Boulevard Initiative.  Provide overcrossing at I-280/John Daly Boulevard, a project that could benefit the northwest COC directly.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 37
 I-280 improvements near D Street exit.

SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR 2040 FOLLOW UP: FINAL ACTION PLAN
The SMCTP 2040 Follow-Up Plan (Final Action Plan) was developed by a multi-agency Working Group to ensure the that goals, projects and programs in SMCTP 2040 would be implemented appropriately. The Final Action Plan:
 Establishes regional and local roles & responsibilities;  Assesses the effectiveness of performance measures in SMCTP 2040 and identifies accountability measures to ensure the Action Plan is reviewed and updated as needed;  Incudes recommendations for effective community outreach and equitable planning; and  Summarizes existing and potential funding sources on the local, state and federal level.

The Final Action Plan prioritizes funding decisions that consider equity, and stresses that the results of County CBTPs should be used to inform the development of the next SMCTP update.

SAN MATEO COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAMS
The County of San Mateo’s Human Services Agency (HSA) provides services that vary from public assistance programs for the homeless to child protective services. HSA also implements the following transportation assistance programs, each of which demonstrates a gap in mobility options for challenged populations.
 Service Connect: This program provides a range of services aimed at supporting former inmates as they re-enter the community, including emergency housing, transportation vouchers, and other basic needs assistance.
 Health Plan of San Mateo (HPSM): HPSM provides a managed care insurance plan for people with Medi-Cal Coverage or through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. One benefit includes the Nonmedical Transportation (NMT) service, which provides rides to HPSM members to outpatient health care services throughout the county. This program is provided through the American Logistics Company, which provides the free ride to participating members.  Daly City Community Service Center: This facility provides emergency safety net assistance, including emergency transportation, to those deemed eligible by a community caseworker.  Subsidized SamTrans Tickets: The HSA purchases $1 million in tickets and bus passes annually from SamTrans to serve low-income individuals, as well as passes for youth, child welfare cases, and those on juvenile probation.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
38 DECEMBER 2019

SAN MATEO COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
PLAN
C/CAG’s 2011 Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (CBPP) recommends bikeways and Pedestrian Focus Areas—defined as areas of high pedestrian demand where pedestrian improvements of countywide significance can be located—to close gaps in the bicycle and pedestrian network. Multiple Pedestrian Focus Areas are in the CBTP study area.

Pedestrian Focus Areas are prioritized for funding through the CBPP, and the CBPP recommends relevant project and design improvements such as:
 Downtown Area Improvements: Sidewalks, walking pathways and crossing improvements.  El Camino Real Corridor Improvements: Walking pathways and crossing improvements, including Grand Boulevard Initiative projects.
 Major Barrier Crossings: Bicyclist and pedestrian crossings of major transportation barriers, including freeway crossings; over/under crossing projects and major arterial crossings; intersection crossing/signalization improvements.
 Safe Routes to School: Walking pathways, sidewalks and intersection improvements near K-12 schools designed to encourage and enable school children to safely walk, bicycle, carpool, and utilize transit to get to school.
 Safe Routes to Transit: Sidewalks and pedestrian intersection improvements within ½ mile of a Caltrain station or BART station. Sidewalks and pedestrian intersection improvements within ¼ mile of a major bus line.
 Access to County/Regional Activity Centers: Sidewalks and pedestrian intersection improvements connecting to activity centers of county or regional significance.

SAN MATEO COUNTY SHUTTLE PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS
The San Mateo County Transportation Authority and C/CAG initiated a joint call for projects in late 2017 to provide funding for the operation of local shuttle services. Eligible projects must serve county residents and employees and provide access to regional transit and/or meet local mobility needs. The scoring system includes the following “Project Need” criteria in order to ensure that projects serve transitchallenged communities:

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 39
 Provides service to an area underserved by transit.
 Provides service to special populations (e.g. transit dependent, seniors).

The current call for projects deadline is February 21, 2020.1

SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR LOW-INCOME

POPULATIONS
The objective of the 2012 Countywide Transportation Plan for Low-Income Populations is to fulfill transportation needs of disadvantaged residents in the county. This Plan outlines the following barriers to project implementation based on analyses of previous planning efforts, including the 2008 Bayshore CBTP:
 Lack of appropriate sustainable and stable funding sources.  The absence of a process to promote implementation of projects.  Projects that require unusual, complex, or difficult partnerships.  Projects that require a degree of administrative resources beyond that of sponsoring agencies.

A series of general transportation improvement efforts was developed based on a community outreach process. The following impact the study area directly:
 Add more bus shelters in Daly City.
 Improve SamTrans connections and service, especially evening services along major arterials.  Improve connections and increase service to destinations important to low-income populations.  Improve crosswalk safety along John Daly Boulevard in Daly City.  Employ a full-time crossing guard at Mission Street and San Pedro Road in Daly City.

CITY OF DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN
The City of Daly City updated its Circulation Element as part of the General Plan Update in 2013. The Circulation Element identifies policies to ensure that adequate transportation facilities are maintained through 2030, to invest in facilities that complement land uses, and to provide a transportation system with a range of choices. In Daly City, topics given special attention include traffic improvements, public transit, bicycle facilities, and mitigation strategies for impacts from individual developments. Roadway 1 C/CAG Technical Advisory Committee, November 21, 2019, San Mateo County Shuttle Program Call For Projects, https://ccag.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Shuttle-Prgm-FY-20-21-21-22-TAC-Mtg-112119-1.pdf, accessed December 11, 2019.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
40 DECEMBER 2019
improvements recommended as feasible and necessary to improving the transportation network within the study areas are listed below:
 Geneva Avenue Extension.
 John Daly Boulevard Overcrossing
 John Daly Boulevard/Lake Merced Boulevard: Optimize Signal Timings and Adjust Signal Phasing  John Daly Boulevard/Park Plaza Drive: Optimize Signal Timings  Lake Merced Boulevard/Southgate Avenue Signal
 I-280 Overcrossings: Pedestrian Improvements
 Serramonte Boulevard/SR-1 On/Off Ramp: Install Traffic Signal  Serramonte Boulevard/Callan Boulevard: Install Traffic Signal  St. Francis Boulevard/Clarinada Avenue: Install Traffic Signal  Clarinada Avenue/SR-1 On/Off Ramp: Install Traffic Signal In addition to future roadway improvements, the following policies or tasks identify gaps in transportation infrastructure and service in the study area:
 Task CE-4.4: As part of the comprehensive infrastructure plan for the Geneva Avenue Corridor identified in Task LU-3.2, develop an infrastructure enhancement fee program specific to new development in the Bayshore area which provides funding for any necessary circulation, utility, and joint-benefit projects planned in this area.
 Task CE-7.2: Participate in efforts by MUNI to extend the 14 Mission Street bus service to the Daly City BART Station to the extent that such a connection does not require the installation of additional utilities in Daly City’s right-of-way or create a visual blight on John Daly Boulevard.  Task CE-7.3: Participate in efforts by MUNI to extend the T-Third light rail line and construct a multimodal Bayshore transit station.
 Task CE-7.4: Support efforts to enhance MUNI and SamTrans service in the Bayshore neighborhood.  Task CE-8.1: Work with both San Mateo County Transit District and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency to explore the concept of peak-hour exclusive bus-only lanes along Mission Street and Geneva Avenue.
 Task CE-11.3: Explore amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to require the payment of parking inlieu fees for parcels 5,000 square feet or less with direct frontage on Mission Street or Geneva

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 41
Avenue. As part of any such amendment, the City shall identify capital improvement(s) for both Mission Street and Geneva Avenue toward which in-lieu money is expended within a certain time.

These improvements may include any improvements that enhance parking, pedestrian mobility, or public transit access along each respective corridor.
 Task CE-13.1: As part of the comprehensive infrastructure and streetscape plan for the Geneva Avenue Corridor (see Task LU-3.2), ensure that both public and private improvements provide significant accommodation of both pedestrian and bicycle transportation modes.  Task CE-14.1: As part of any City involvement in or comments provided for the Geneva Avenue connection with the Candlestick Highway 101 Interchange, work toward the inclusion of both pedestrian and bicycle transportation modes that, at a minimum, extend those identified in the Geneva Avenue infrastructure plan, and/or Daly City Bicycle Route Map.  Policy CE-15: Ensure the new buildings along Mission Street and Geneva Avenue are situated so that they are easily accessible by pedestrians.
 Task CE-16.6: Work with BART on providing safe pedestrian access to and from the Daly City BART Station that utilizes existing street level crossings on John Daly Boulevard and maximizes either existing or future grade separated crossing(s) at this location.

DALY CITY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) for the City of Daly City was adopted in 2013 to define the future bicycle network and improve the network’s safety and efficiency. The BPP identifies the City’s top five priorities to achieve its objectives, four of which highlight mobility challenges within or adjacent to the study area:
 Priority One: John Daly Boulevard. Provide signing and pavement markings designating a Class III bikeway between Sheffield Drive and Mission Street. The bikeway would connect to an existing Class I bike path.
 Priority Three: Geneva Avenue. Provide signing and pavement marking designating a Class III lanes between Santos Street and Bayshore Boulevard. Once completed the bike lanes would close the gap between the existing bike lanes on Geneva Avenue (west of Santos Street) and on Bayshore Boulevard.
 Priority Four: Junipero Serra Boulevard. Provide signing and pavement markings designating a Class III bikeway between the City Limit and John Daly Boulevard. The bikeway would connect to existing Class II bike lanes in Colma. Once completed, the bikeway would provide a north-south route between Colma and Dal City BART stations.
 Priority Five: John Daly Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard Intersection. Construct pathway from North Mayfair Avenue to the northeast corner of John Daly Boulevard/Skyline Boulevard. Construct sidewalk on the north side of John Daly Boulevard between Eastgate Drive and Skyline Boulevard.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
42 DECEMBER 2019

DALY CITY VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
In 2018, Daly City received a grant from the Federal Highway Administration to develop a Vision Zero Action Plan to eliminate traffic deaths in Daly City, the first such plan in San Mateo County. The Action Plan, which is expected to be adopted in 2020, uses a data- and community-driven process to establish a local course of traffic safety in the city. It includes a series of roadway safety strategies and countermeasures, as well as a comprehensive Safety Plan and evaluation strategy.

The Vision Zero Action Plan represents Daly City’s prioritization of safe mobility for all transportation modes and groups. It will benefit the entire CBTP study area and highlight existing transportation liabilities and solutions.
2008 CBTP Implementation Status
As noted in the introduction to this document, the last update to a CBTP in the Daly City area was the 2008 Bayshore CBTP, which included a study area composed of the northeast COC in the current CBTP study area. The 2008 CBTP recommended 14 projects, programs and plans categorized by implementation timeline, including Short-Term, Short- to Mid-Term, Mid-Term and Long-Term efforts. Table 4 tallies each of these projects and plans by the degree to which they have been implemented. It also includes information regarding factors that influenced the success or failure of each.

As shown in Table 4, two of the 14 CBTP recommendations have been fully implemented, a success rate of about 14 percent. Six of the recommendations have not been implemented and 6 have been partially implemented, a rate of about 43 percent each.

Table 4 Status of 2008 Bayshore CBTP Recommendations
Recommended
Project/Plan/Program Level of Implementation Notes

Fully
Implemented
Partially
Implemented
Not
Implemented
Short-Term
Provide Circulator Shuttle ✔ Hindered by multi-agency coordination, subsidy restrictions, driver shortages
Provide Discounted Taxi
Rides to Medical Facilities ✔
Hindered by private partnership agreement
difficulties, lack of funding source, complex
reimbursement and discount mechanism
needs development, increasing preference
towards TNCs
Subsidize School Bus
Service ✔
Hindered by school transfers as barrier to
entry, no responsible party identified for
funding source identification
Improve Taxi Service
Information ✔ Strategy not predicated on data- or outreachdriven conditions, resulting in ill-defined

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 43
Table 4 Status of 2008 Bayshore CBTP Recommendations
Recommended
Project/Plan/Program Level of Implementation Notes

Fully
Implemented
Partially
Implemented
Not
Implemented
action plan. Since that time, the rise of TNCs
have made this strategy obsolete.

Increase Public Awareness
about Transportation
Options
✔
Printed materials now obsolete with online
resources and smartphone availability;
strategy redundant with other awareness
programs
Short- to Mid-Term
Improve Transit Stops –
SamTrans ✔ Hindered by lack of multi-agency
coordination and funding source
Improve Transit Stops –
MUNI ✔
Hindered by limiting site conditions, permit
denial, public acceptance required, shifts in
route service
Improve Bicycle
Infrastructure ✔ Bike facilities installed along Geneva in 2017 Provide Transit
Information in Different
Languages
✔ Printed materials obsolete with online
resources and smartphone availability
Subsidize Monthly Transit
Passes for Low Income
Riders
✔
Transit Fare Assistance program (CalWORKS)
included in County Welfare to Work
Transportation Plan
Mid-Term
Provide Shuttle Service to
Kaiser Medical Offices ✔ Hindered by lack of TDM Strategy to plan, fund, and implement service Enhance Pedestrian Safety ✔ Hindered by lack of jurisdictional accountability
Improve Affordability of
Transfers between Transit
Systems
✔ Hindered by development of equitable
revenue exchange mechanism
Long-Term
Provide Fixed-Route
Transit Service ✔ Service provided by SamTrans Circulator Shuttle, which has many of the same stop
TOTAL 2 6 6

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
44 DECEMBER 2019

KEY FINDINGS AND TRENDS
Based on the demographic and transportation analysis outlined in this assessment, the study area has underserved populations when compared to San Mateo County overall. Resources and services are less accessible for residents in these neighborhoods which may be based on the key findings identified below.  COCs with higher rates of seniors also had higher rates of people with disabilities. While disabilities can occur at any age, physical and sensory disabilities are more common later in life. Therefore, services provided for the disabled may also need to be catered towards senior needs as well.  While the rate of commutes by car, truck, or van is lower in the study area than the county, the rate of carpoolers is higher. This may be partially attributed to the lower vehicle availability in the study area, encouraging people without vehicles to seek out a driver for carpooling. However, the northwest COC has both the lowest rate of carpools and lowest rate of vehicle availability. This indicates that in pockets with significantly high rates of households without cars, residents may have difficulties finding a vehicle owner to carpool with. Programs that match carpool drivers with riders may alleviate this gap in carpooling ability.
 The lowest transit rate use is found in the northeast COC which may be partially attributed to the few transit stops mapped within that neighborhood in comparison to the other COCs in the study area. Focusing on increasing transit stops within walking distance of homes in this neighborhood may improve and expand commute options for residents in that COC.  The central and northwest COC have the highest percentage of households with no vehicles. This may be partially attributed to their nearby proximity to the Colma and Daly City BART stations, respectively.
 The Bayshore (northeast) COC is the only COC included in the 2008 CBTP. The factors that define a COC and other demographic challenges still frustrate equitable transportation here. This COC has the highest rate of population in poverty across the study area, as well as one of the highest rates of seniors and limited English-speaking households. Residents of this COC also exhibit one the lowest rates of transit use. The success rate of recommendations from the 2008 Bayshore CBTP should be assessed carefully in the development of new projects and programs.  Traffic safety is a historic problem and current focus in Daly City. As noted above, Daly City is the first city in San Mateo County to develop a Vision Zero Action Plan. The outreach, data and solutions resulting from this effort may support recommendations targeting safe mobility among COC populations.
 MUNI services, including regular fixed-route buses and multiple paratransit programs, are limited in the Daly City COCs. Connectivity between existing transit service in Daly City and MUNI programs should be explored.

Analysis of 2008 CBTP recommendations and their following success revealed trends for consideration when developing updated programs and policies in this study area. The trends are discussed below.

DALY CITY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CITY/COUNTY AS SOCIAT ION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO

COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
PLACEWORKS 45
 Technological Advancements Rendering Programs Obsolete.

Online tools and engagement have become more accessible as smartphones have become ubiquitous. Recommendations should anticipate emerging and evolving technologies by devising programs and policies that are flexible and applicable in the fickle technological landscape of today.  Political Constraints with Multi-Agency Coordination.

When the implementation of a program or policy relies on coordination across multiple jurisdictions or agencies, the complex planning and communication needed to implement the program becomes a barrier for program success. Creating clear, singular responsible parties reduces coordination and agreement necessary to carry out goals and objectives of the CBTP. Recommendations should minimize the responsible parties to optimize policy and program success.  Unjustified or Unfounded Recommendations.

Recommendations in the CBTP should respond directly to quantitative data, documented feedback trends and previously identified transportation gaps. Strategies based on perceptions, assumptions and/or ill-defined conditions are more likely to suffer from unspecified action plans and allocation of responsibility, resulting in low funding potential.
 Unidentified Funding/Responsible Agency to Research Funding.

When programs fail to identify a secured funding source, the first challenge to implementation becomes identifying a funding source. Adding an extra step of attempting to obtain funding increases the project timeline and decreases the likelihood of timely and effective program implementation. Furthermore, some programs may identify a potential funding source but fail to indicate a party to pursue and obtain the funding. A lack of responsible agency leaves the policy without actionable next steps to mobilize implementation. Agency staff may extend considerable resources searching for funds in the form of appropriate grant opportunities and other options. All recommendations should identify a clear, available funding source and assign an agency responsible for the pursuit and preservation of the funds for the project.

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX C

C OMMUNITY O UTREACH

D OCUMENTATION

........................................................................................................................

HELP IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION

OPTIONS IN DALY CITY

PARTICIPATE IN THE DALY CITY

COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The CBTP will:
• Evaluate transportation gaps and barriers identified by the community
• Develop solutions & projects to address these
challenges
• Identify possible funding sources to pay for these
solutions & projects

HOW TO PARTICIPATE
Community Feedback Events:

We will be hosting a series of project
“Pop-Ups” at community events
throughout Daly City. Please stop by
and tell us about your transportation
challenges and ideas.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Callan
Blvd
Gull Dr
Mitchell Ave
E Grand
Ave
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Manor Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
King Dr
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Daly City CBTP Study Area

COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR C/CAG OF SAN MATEO COUNTY San
Francisco
Bay
Pacific
Ocean

Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
0 0.375 0.75 1.5
I2
Olive
School St Ave
Gull Dr
Mitchell Ave
E Grand
Ave
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Linden
Ave
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Airport Blvd
Airport
Blvd
Study Area
Community of Concern
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions
San Mateo County
I BART Station
I CalTrain Station
2 2
0 Scale (Miles)

1.5 PLAN STUDY AREA

AYUDA A MEJORAR LAS OPCIONES DE

TRANSPORTE EN SUR ESTE SAN MATEO
COUNTY

PARTICIPE EN EL PLAN DE TRANSPORTE

BASADO EN LA COMUNIDAD DE DALY CITY
El CBTP hará:
• Evaluar las brechas de transporte y las barreras
identificadas por la comunidad
• Desarrollar soluciones y proyectos para solucionar
estos desafiós
• Identificar posibles fuentes de financiación para pagar esas soluciones y proyectos
CÓMO PARTICIPAR
Eventos de Comentarios Para
la Comunidad:

Vamos a organizar una serie de
proyectos “Pop-Ups” en eventos
comunitarios a lo largo de Daly City.

Por favor, pasa a uno de los eventos y
cuétanos sobre tus desafíos e ideas de
transporte.

I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Callan
Blvd
Gull Dr
Mitchell Ave
E Grand
Ave
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Manor Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
King Dr
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Daly City CBTP Study Area

COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR C/CAG OF SAN MATEO COUNTY San
Francisco
Bay
Pacific
Ocean

Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
0 0.375 0.75 1.5
Área de Estudio
Comunidad de Preocupación

Daly City
Otras Jurisdicciones
Condado de San Mateo
I Estación BART
I Estación Caltrain
2 2

AYUDA A MEJORAR LAS OPCIONES DE

TRANSPORTE EN DALY CITY
0 Scala (Millas)

1.5 ÁREA DE ESTUDIO DEL PLAN

HELP IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION

OPTIONS IN DALY CITY

PARTICIPATE IN THE DALY CITY

COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The CBTP will:
• Evaluate transportation gaps and barriers identified by the community
• Develop solutions & projects to address these
challenges
• Identify possible funding sources to pay for these
solutions & projects

PLEASE TAKE OUR SURVEY
Your feedback
will shape the Plan:

The results of this short survey about
existing transportation problems will
allow us to create meaningful solutions:
https://arcg.is/eaCLy0
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Callan
Blvd
Gull Dr
Mitchell Ave
E Grand
Ave
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Manor Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
King Dr
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Daly City CBTP Study Area

COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR C/CAG OF SAN MATEO COUNTY San
Francisco
Bay
Pacific
Ocean

Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
0 0.375 0.75 1.5
I
Study Area
Community of Concern
Daly City
Other Jurisdictions
San Mateo County
I BART Station
I CalTrain Station
Área de Estudio
Comunidad de Preocupación

Daly City
Otras Jurisdicciones
Condado de San Mateo
I Estación BART
I Estación Caltrain
2 2
2 2
0 Scale (Miles)

1.5 PLAN STUDY AREA

AYUDA A MEJORAR LAS OPCIONES DE

TRANSPORTE EN SUR ESTE SAN MATEO
COUNTY

PARTICIPE EN EL PLAN DE TRANSPORTE

BASADO EN LA COMUNIDAD DE DALY CITY
El CBTP hará:
• Evaluar las brechas de transporte y las barreras
identificadas por la comunidad
• Desarrollar soluciones y proyectos para solucionar
estos desafiós
• Identificar posibles fuentes de financiación para pagar esas soluciones y proyectos
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2

DALY CITY

BRISBANE
COLMA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO

PACIFICA
Broadmoor
SAN

FRANCISCO
COUNTY

SAN MATEO
COUNTY
Olive
Ave
3rd St
School St
Callan Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Callan
Blvd
Gull Dr
Mitchell Ave
E Grand
Ave
San Jose
Ave
Grand Ave
King Dr
Manor Dr
Geneva Ave
Orange Ave
Colma
Blvd
Chestnut Ave
Lake Merced Blvd
Eccles Ave
E Grand Ave
Lawndale Blvd
King Dr
Gateway Dr
Evergreen Dr
Hillside Blvd
Eastmoor
Ave
Grandview Dr
Oyster Point Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Skyline Blvd
San Bruno Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Carter St
John Daly Blvd Palmetto Ave
Southhill Blvd
Linden
Ave
Serramonte
Blvd
Visitacion Ave
Southgate
Ave
Del Monte Ave
Mission St
E Market St
Sunnydale Ave
Alemany
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
Gateway
Blvd
St Francis Blvd
Crocker Ave
87th St
Mission St
Forbes Blvd Forbes Blvd
Sierra Point Pkwy
Junipero Serra Blvd
Callan Blvd
Mission Rd
Airport Blvd Airport
Blvd
Hickey Blvd
Gellert Blvd Gellert Blvd
El Camino Real
El Camino Real
Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy
Tunnel Ave
Southgate Ave
Skyline Dr
Skyline Blvd
Skyline Blvd
Brotherhood
Way
CA-1 N
Bay Shore Blvd
Daly City CBTP Study Area

COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR C/CAG OF SAN MATEO COUNTY San
Francisco
Bay
Pacific
Ocean

Æþ101
|ÿ1
%&'(280
0 0.375 0.75 1.5
Área de Estudio
Comunidad de Preocupación

Daly City
Otras Jurisdicciones
Condado de San Mateo
I Estación BART
I Estación Caltrain
2 2

AYUDA A MEJORAR LAS OPCIONES DE

TRANSPORTE EN DALY CITY

POR FAVOR,

TOME NUESTRA ENCUESTA
Sus comentarios darán
forma al Plan:

Los resultados de esta breve encuesta
sobre los problemas de transporte
existentes nos permitirán crear
soluciones significativas:
https://arcg.is/1ra0uH
0 Scala (Millas)

1.5 ÁREA DE ESTUDIO DEL PLAN

ni nonsedion necaborae. Nem:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ni nonsedion necaborae. Nem:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TOWN HALL MEETING
May 17, 2021, 5:00-7:00pm: Local Transportation Challenges Pagpupulong sa Bulwagan ng Bayan,
ika-17 ng Mayo, 5-7pm: Mga Hamon sa
Lokal na Transportasyon Mga residente ng
Daly City, samahan kami sa isang Virtual na
Pagpupulong sa Bulwagan ng Bayan upang
pag-usapan ang mga balakid sa pang-arawaraw na transportasyon sa ating komunidad.

Ang inyong opinyon ay mahalaga sa pagbuo
ng isang plano para sa pagpapabuti ng
kalidad ng buhay. Ang impormasyon tungkol
sa pagpaparehistro ay matatagpuan dito:
http://bit.ly/TownHallTransportation.
市民大会，时间：2021 年 5 月
17 日，下午 5 至 7 点：主题：
本地交通面临的挑战
戴利城居民，请参加我们的虚
拟市民大会，一起讨论有关我
们社区面临的日常交通障碍
问题。你们的意见是我们制定
交通计划以提高生活质量的
关键。相关的注册信息，请到
此网站：
http://bit.ly/TownHallTransportation.

Town Hall Meeting, May
17th, 2021, 5-7pm: Local
Transportation Challenges
Daly City residents, please join
us in a Virtual Town Hall Meeting
to discuss daily transportation
barriers in our community. Your
input is vital to a developing a
plan to improve quality of life.

Registration information is
located here:
www.bit.ly/TownHallTransportation.

Reunión del Ayuntamiento, 17 de
mayo de 2021, 5- 7pm: Desafíos
del transporte local residentes de Daly
City, por favor únase a nosotros en
una reunión virtual del ayuntamiento
para discutir las barreras diarias
de transporte local en nuestra
comunidad. Su aporte es vital para
desarrollar un plan para mejorar la
calidad de vida.La información de
registro se encuentra aquí:
http://bit.ly/TownHallTransportation.

January 25, 2022
Mr. Wesley Wong
Re: Permit for Expressive Activity at BART Stations
Greetings,
Pursuant to the Rules of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Pertaining to Use of District Facilities for Expressive Activities (Rules), attached and incorporated by reference, and the information provided in your Permit Application, this letter serves as your Permit to engage in Free Speech expressive activity described as Community Outreach at the following BART station(s) on these dates and times:

Colma BART Station(s), 2/8, 2022; 9am-9pm
Expressive activity is allowed only in the “Free Area” of BART stations (where access is available to the general public) and prohibited in the “Paid Area” of BART stations (where access is available only to ticketed passengers), including BART cars and trains and BART Station platforms including BART to Oakland International Airport platforms and trains.

This permit is not a concessions permit to sell goods, merchandise or services at BART stations. BART parking is for round trip BART riders only.

You are required to have this permit on your person or with your group when engaging in your activity. At the request of a BART Station Agent, BART Transportation Supervisor, Office of External Affairs staff member or BART Police Officer, you must produce this Permit. Please work with the BART Station Agent or BART Transportation Supervisor to determine the exact location within the “free area” of the station for your activity.

You shall not (1) interfere with the smooth flow of passengers through entrances or exits or other areas of BART stations; (2) interfere with the access onto or off of an escalator, stairway or elevator; (3) interfere with access to or from any fare gate, ticket or automatic fare collection machine; (4) interfere with any BART authorized commercial activity or concession; (5) interfere with BART employees’ conduct of their business; (6) interfere with access to any fire safety system component, public telephone, information board or news vending machine or kiosk; (7) post or affix to BART property or facilities, any signs, leaflets, posters, flyers, pamphlets, brochures and written, pictorial or graphic material of any kind, or structures, banners and any other paraphernalia; 8) use a sound amplification device (Penal Code section 640);(9) disturb the peace (Penal Code section 415), or disturb others by engaging in boisterous or unruly behavior (Penal Code section 640); (10) willfully block the free movement of another person (Penal Code section 640); or (11) violate any applicable law including but not limited to Penal Code section 602.7 prohibiting the sale of goods, merchandise or services without written consent of BART. Any prohibited conduct mentioned above shall be sufficient cause for cancellation of the permit by BART.

You shall clean-up the area where your activity was conducted and remove all your written materials and property which shall not be left behind or stored at BART stations.

This Permit is not transferable and shall not be assigned, and any attempt to do so shall be void.

A.T.

Department Manager

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
2150 Webster Street, P.O. Box 12688
Oakland, CA 94604-2688
(510) 464-6000
2022
Rebecca Saltzman

PRESIDENT
Janice Li

VICE PRESIDENT
Robert Powers

GENERAL MANAGER

DIRECTORS
Debora Allen
1ST DISTRICT
Mark Foley
2ND DISTRICT
Rebecca Saltzman
3RD DISTRICT
Robert Raburn, Ph.D.
4TH DISTRICT
John McPartland
5TH DISTRICT
Elizabeth Ames
6TH DISTRICT
Lateefah Simon
7TH DISTRICT
Janice Li
8TH DISTRICT
Bevan Dufty
9TH DISTRICT

www.bart.gov