Desert Hot Springs City Council
April 21, 2026

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

5.0 Public Transportation Mobility
This chapter provides an overview of public transportation facilities and describes the state of the existing transit environment as it relates to connectivity, quality, and safety. The information presented includes the presence of transit routes and stops and how they relate to existing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Existing bus stop amenities and daily boardings and alightings were assessed to indicate connectivity and quality. Lastly, bicycle and pedestrian collisions with 500’ of a transit stop were analyzed to determine safety around public transportation.

Network Connectivity
As shown in Figure 5.1, DHS is served by SunLine Bus Routes 2, 3 and 5.  Route 2 traverses the City north to south via Palm Drive, with a loop around Mission Lakes Boulevard, West Drive and Pierson Boulevard. It traverses the I-10 and continues to the southern cities of Palm Springs and Cathedral City.
 Route 3 covers the City center along Pierson Boulevard, West Drive, Two Bunch Palms Trail and Palm Drive, and connects to Desert Edge to the east, via Hacienda Avenue.  Route 5 also traverses the City from north to south via Palm Drive with a small loop around downtown. It then takes the I-10 to the east until it connects to Palm Desert.

Even though DHS is well-served by north-south transit routes and a portion to the east is covered, the far western portion of the City is not currently served by transit. The western portion of the City is largely undeveloped, however, new developments have recently opened or are under construction.

SunLine routes do not currently connect directly to the Palm Springs Amtrak Station, which has round trip service on the combined Sunset Limited/Texas Eagle three times a week. However, Route 2 connects to Downtown Palm Springs and Palm Springs International Airport, which has twice-daily Amtrak Thruway Bus service (Route 39) that connects to the Amtrak and Metrolink Station in Fullerton twice a day.

Currently, every SunLine bus is equipped with a bike rack and bicycles may be loaded or unloaded at any SunLine bus stop.

There are 48 bus stops within the City of DHS. Figure 5.2 and Table 5.1 display daily transit ridership by stop. As shown, the West at Pierson bus stop has the highest daily ridership in DHS – and the fourth highest ridership on the SunLine system – with more than 165 boardings and alightings. This bus stop is the convergence point for all three DHS bus routes (2, 3, and 5), and it’s close to several key destinations for active transportation, such as the Desert Hot Springs Recreation, Carl May Community Center and Riverside County Department of Public Social Services.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.1 - Existing Public Transit Routes
Source: SunLine (2025)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.2 - Average Daily Boardings and Alightings
Source: SunLine (2025)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Table 5.1 - Desert Hot Springs Transit Stops and Ridership Stop ID Transit Stop Average Daily Ridership
763 West Dr. at Pierson Blvd. (Southbound (SB)) 166
138 Hacienda Ave. at Palm Dr. (Eastbound (EB)) 47
5 Palm Dr. at Hacienda Ave. (SB) 45
6 Palm Dr. at Ironwood Dr. (SB) 36
765 Palm Dr. at Two Brunch Palm Tr. (SB) 34
483 Palm Dr. at Buena Vista Ave. (SB) 33
764 Pierson Blvd. at Cactus Dr. (EB) 26
2 Palm Dr. at Hacienda Ave. (Northbound (NB)) 24
1 Palm Dr. at Two Bunch Palm Tr. (NB) 19
904 Hacienda Ave. at Mountain View Rd. (Westbound (WB)) 15 488 Palm Dr. at Palm Drive Mobile Estates (SB) 15
489 Palm Dr. at Dillon Rd. (SB) 14
602 Cholla Dr. at 4th St. (NB) 11
824 Palm Dr. at 8th St. (NB) 11
619 Palm Dr. at Ironwood Dr. (NB) 11
134 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at Palm Dr. (WB) 9
615 Palm Dr. at Dillon Rd. (NB) 9
8 Palm Dr. at Sky Haven (SB) 9
616 Palm Dr. at Camino Aventura (NB) 8
821 Hacienda Ave. at Foxdale Dr. (WB) 8
859 Hacienda Ave. at Don English Wy. (WB) 8
826 Mission Lakes Blvd. at El Mirador Blvd. (WB) 7
905 Hacienda Ave. at Acacia Ave. (WB) 6
621 Palm Dr. at Buena Vista Ave. (NB) 5
789 West Dr. at Mission Lakes Blvd. (SB) 5
482 Palm Dr. at Paul (SB) 5
823 Palm Dr. at 4th St. (NB) 4
481 Palm Dr. at Paul Rd. (NB) 4
618 Palm Dr. at Park Ln. (NB) 4
3 Palm Dr. at Estrella Ave. (NB) 3
813 Palm Dr. at 1St. St. (NB) 3
135 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at West St. (WB) 3
820 Hacienda Ave. at Miracle Hill Rd. (WB) 2
449 Hacienda Ave. at Mountain View Rd. (EB) 2
827 West Dr. at 8th St. (SB) 2
825 Palm Dr. at 12th St. (NB) 2
830 Hacienda Ave. at Tamar Dr. (EB) 2
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Stop ID Transit Stop Average Daily Ridership
829 Hacienda Ave. at Mesquite Ave. (EB) 2
617 Palm Dr. at Camino Companero (NB) 1
136 West Dr. at Granada Ave. (NB) 1
832 Hacienda Ave. at Hidalgo St. (EB) 1
612 Palm Dr. at 20th Ave (NB) 1
454 Hacienda Ave. at Peak St. (EB) 1
762 West Dr. at 4th St. (SB) 1
325 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at Cactus Dr. (WB) 1
831 Hacienda Ave. at Miracle Hill Rd. (EB) 1
301 Pierson Blvd. at West Dr. (WB) <1
906 Hacienda Ave. at Avn. La Vista (EB) <1
Source: SunLine (2025)
Transit Stop & Network Quality
Transit quality is related to the frequency of service, amenities – including information – provided at each stop, and access to and from transit stops.

Routes 2 and 3 operate on half-hour headways starting at 5:00am with service ending at 10:30pm and 8:35pm, respectively. Route 5 operates on one-hour headways during peak morning and afternoon/evening periods.

The SunLine Transit Design Manual (2006) includes guidelines on passenger amenities at transit stops. Suggested standard and optional amenities should be provided depending on the intensity of use of the bus stop, with higher ridership stops having higher qualities of amenities. Table 5.2 shows the standard (■) and optional (●) amenities for each range of stops by daily boardings.

Table 5.2 - Recommended Amenities by Daily Boardings
Feature

Sign and poleBuilt-in signPublic roadwayNon-public roadwayExpanded sidewalkAccessibleSeatingPassenger shelterPermanent structureRoute designationsTimetableRoute mapSystem mapTrash receptacleTelephoneIndividual bus baysPark and rideBus padsRed curbsLighting Daily Boardings
<25 ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● ■ ● ●
25-50 ■ ■ ● ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ● ● ■ ■ ●
50-100 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ● ■ ■ ■
100-250 ■ ● ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ■ ■ ■
>250 ● ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ■
Key: ■ = Standard ● = Optional
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Table 5.3 presents the amenities present at each transit stop and highlights the standard suggested amenities missing based on the existing ridership. As shown, the existing stops align with the Design Manual’s standard amenities. The one exception is bus pads, which are not present at the stops.

Due to the higher frequency of service and ridership, DHS should consider installing bus pads at Bus Stop #763, West Drive and Pierson Boulevard, South Bound (SB) and other higher ridership stops.

Table 5.3 - Transit Stop Amenities
EXISTING AMENITIES 1
Sign and poleBuilt-in signPublic roadwayExpanded sidewalkAccessibleSeatingPassenger shelterRoute designationsTimetableRoute mapSystem mapTrash receptacleTelephonePark and rideBus padsRed curbsLighting

BUS STOP
# Name
763 West Dr. at Pierson Blvd.
(SB) ■ ○ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ○ ■ ○ ○ □ ■ ■
138 Hacienda Ave. at Palm Dr.
(EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ●
5 Palm Dr. at Hacienda Ave.
(SB) ■ ■ ● □ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ●
6 Palm Dr. at Ironwood Dr. (SB) ■ ■ ● ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ○ 765 Palm Dr. at Two Brunch Palm
Tr. (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ●
483 Palm Dr. at Buena Vista Ave.
(SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ □ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ●
764 Pierson Blvd. at Cactus Dr.
(EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ■ ● ■ ● ● ● ○ ○ □ ■ ●
2 Palm Dr. at Hacienda Ave.
(NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
1 Palm Dr. at Two Bunch Palm
Tr. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
904 Hacienda Ave. at Mountain
View Rd. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
488 Palm Dr. at Palm Drive Mobile
Estates (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
489 Palm Dr. at Dillon Rd. (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 602 Cholla Dr. at 4th St. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 824 Palm Dr. at 8th St. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
619 Palm Dr. at Ironwood Dr. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 134 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at Palm
Dr. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
615 Palm Dr. at Dillon Rd. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● Key: ■ = Standard, present □ = Standard, not present ● = Optional, present ○ = Optional, not present Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

EXISTING AMENITIES 1
Sign and poleBuilt-in signPublic roadwayExpanded sidewalkAccessibleSeatingPassenger shelterRoute designationsTimetableRoute mapSystem mapTrash receptacleTelephonePark and rideBus padsRed curbsLighting

BUS STOP
# Name
8 Palm Dr. at Sky Haven (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
616 Palm Dr. at Camino Aventura
(NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
821 Hacienda Ave. at Foxdale Dr.
(WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
859 Hacienda Ave. at Don English
Wy. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
826 Mission Lakes Blvd. at El
Mirador Blvd. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
905 Hacienda Ave. at Acacia Ave.
(WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
621 Palm Dr. at Buena Vista Ave.
(NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
789 West Dr. at Mission Lakes
Blvd. (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
482 Palm Dr. at Paul (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
823 Palm Dr. at 4th St. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
481 Palm Dr. at Paul Rd. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 618 Palm Dr. at Park Ln. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 3 Palm Dr. at Estrella Ave. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 813 Palm Dr. at 1St. St. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 135 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at West
St. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
820 Hacienda Ave. at Miracle Hill
Rd. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
449 Hacienda Ave. at Mountain
View Rd. (EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
827 West Dr. at 8th St. (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
825 Palm Dr. at 12th St. (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 830 Hacienda Ave. at Tamar Dr.
(EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
829 Hacienda Ave. at Mesquite
Ave. (EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
Key: ■ = Standard, present □ = Standard, not present ● = Optional, present ○ = Optional, not present Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

EXISTING AMENITIES 1
Sign and poleBuilt-in signPublic roadwayExpanded sidewalkAccessibleSeatingPassenger shelterRoute designationsTimetableRoute mapSystem mapTrash receptacleTelephonePark and rideBus padsRed curbsLighting

BUS STOP
# Name
617 Palm Dr. at Camino
Companero (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
136 West Dr. at Granada Ave.
(NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
832 Hacienda Ave. at Hidalgo St.
(EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
612 Palm Dr. at 20th Ave (NB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ○ ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ● 454 Hacienda Ave. at Peak St.
(EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
762 West Dr. at 4th St. (SB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
325 Two Bunch Palms Tr. at
Cactus Dr. (WB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ○ ○ ■ ● ○ ○ □ □ ○
831 Hacienda Ave. at Miracle Hill
Rd. (EB) ■ ■ ○ ■ ● ● ■ ● ● ● □ ■ ●
301 Pierson Blvd. at West Dr.
(WB) □ ■ ○ ■ ○ ○ □ ○ ○ ○ □ ■ ○
906 Hacienda Ave. at Avn. La
Vista (EB) ■ ■ ● ■ ○ ○ ■ ● ○ ○ □ ■ ○
Source: SunLine Transit, Google Maps, CRA (2025)

Key: ■ = Standard, present □ = Standard, not present ● = Optional, present ○ = Optional, not present Note:

1. This table excludes non-public roadways, permanent structures, and individual bus bays as these features are not present at any bus stop in Desert Hot Springs and are not suggested as standard or optional features based on the Sunline Transit Design Manual (2006).

Figure 5.3 shows public streets within a half-mile of transit stops where sidewalks are present and missing. The areas where there are missing sidewalks indicate opportunities to improve first/last mile access, especially where the stops have higher ridership rates.

Figure 5.4 illustrates the Pedestrian Connectivity Ratio from transit stops based on a half-mile network analysis. This analysis includes both a baseline and a PES-adjusted network, as explained in section 3.2, Pedestrian Mobility – Network Quality. In the PES-adjusted network, routing was prohibited on segments with a Very Low PES score to reflect their unsuitability for pedestrian travel.

To further account for the relative comfort of the pedestrian environment, segment lengths were adjusted based on PES scores: segments with a PES of Low had their distance values multiplied by 3, while those with a PES of Medium were multiplied by 2. For example, a segment originally measured at 50 feet would be treated as 150 feet if it scored as Low PES in the adjusted network.

These adjusted distances inform the connectivity ratio.

As shown, the majority of the network is less connected than the street network alone might convey, with the PES-adjusted network (orange) falling short of the potential network access (blue). Bus stops that exhibit the greatest connectivity are nearly exclusively in the northern portion of the town, Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

on or north of Pierson Boulevard and on or west of Palm Drive. The majority of stops along or south of Two Bunch Palms Trail have extremely limited network connectivity – both PES-adjusted and not adjusted – due to the limited presence of street networks and lack of sidewalks. The disparity between potential and adjusted walksheds indicates that there is room for improvement.

Figure 5.5 illustrates the locations of bus stops overlayed on streets within one-half mile with LTS scores of 3 or 4, representing higher levels of traffic stress for bicyclists. As shown, bus stops are largely located along uncomfortable or high stress roadways. The City’s strong street grid and short block spacing downtown provides ample alternative parallel routes with more favorable bicycling environments, however, utilizing these roadways may result in out of direction travel, increasing the overall time required to access bus services.

Figure 5.6 displays bicycle connectivity ratio from transit stops. Similar to the walksheds shown in Figure 5.4, a one-half mile bikeshed was assessed on existing roads. The assessment was then modified to reflect the level of stress exerted on bicyclists by the existing environment by modifying travel distances based on Level of Travel Stress (LTS) scores. For more information on LTS, see section 4.2, Bicycle Mobility – Network Quality.

As shown, the LTS-adjusted (orange) bikesheds extend nearly as far as the unadjusted (blue) bikesheds. This indicates that in areas where there are transit stops, there are also roadway options with posted speed limits low enough that stress while cycling is not an issue. However, south of Dillon Road, the unadjusted bikeshed exceeds the reach of the LTS-adjusted bikeshed, indicating that improvements, such as separation from vehicles, may be needed to increase comfort for all or most bicyclists.

Safety
Transit riders frequently access stations by walking or riding a bike, emphasizing the importance of ensuring safe active transportation mobility surrounding transit stop areas. Determining collision hotspots can inform future safety improvements, policies, and programs along with implementation prioritization. Figure 5.7 displays the locations of pedestrian- and bicycle-involved collisions with 500’ of a transit stop. The highest concentrations were found around bus stops located at the intersection of Palm Drive and Hacienda Avenue and the intersection of Palm Drive and Two Bunch Palms Trail.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.3 - First/Last Mile Sidewalk Gaps
Source: CR Associates (2025)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.4 - Pedestrian Connectivity Ratio from Transit Stops Source: CR Associates (2025)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.5 - First/Last Mile High Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Locations Source: CR Associates (2025)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.6 - Bicycle Connectivity Ratio from Transit Stops Source: City of Desert Hot Springs (2023), CR Associates (2025) Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 5.7 - Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions with 500’ of a Transit Stop Source: California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2019-2023), CR Associates (2025) Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

6.0 Conclusion / Key Findings
This chapter summarizes the opportunities and constraints identified through the existing conditions analysis. The synthesis incorporates information derived from the review of existing documents, demographics and equity indicators, existing infrastructure, active transportation patterns, transit service and facilities, and collision history.

Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure should provide users with safe and comfortable environments while facilitating connections to destinations and between communities. Safety and comfort are paramount considerations for pedestrians and cyclists, since by nature, they are more sensitive to the characteristics of the roadway environment compared to those traveling by automobile. A slight gap in infrastructure or comfortable conditions can deter users from a particular route or alter the choice of transportation mode.

The findings from this Existing Conditions Report, combined with input from community members and agency stakeholders, will be used to inform the identification of infrastructure and programmatic recommendations. ATP recommendations will assist the development of active transportation infrastructure comprised of facilities that support and encourage trips for users of all ages and abilities.

Figure 6.1 and the text below summarize some of the key opportunities and constraints identified through this existing conditions assessment.

Retrofit existing roadways with context appropriate active transportation enhancements.

As Desert Hot Springs continues to grow, the need for a comprehensive multimodal transportation network becomes more apparent. Many of the existing roadways lack continuous sidewalks, accessible curb ramps, dedicated bicycle facilities and marked crosswalks. In some areas, the existing infrastructure is incompatible with the roadway environments, such as bike lanes along highspeed roadways. The City recently retrofitted portions of Palm Drive with high visibility crosswalks and crossing features, as well as buffered bike lanes and supporting green conflict paint. Continuing the improvement of existing infrastructure with context appropriate enhancements for active transportation users will benefit existing and future community members, while expanding viable transportation options.

Leverage undeveloped areas as opportunities and build upon adopted planning efforts.

Most land in the City is undeveloped, however, the City’s General Plan (2020) provides a long-term blueprint for future development of land and public rights-of-way. The undeveloped lands and roadways represent unique opportunities to identify and plan for optimal environments that are supportive of safe, comfortable, and well-connected transportation facilities. Wide sidewalks supported by enhanced crossing treatments, bike facilities that are physically separated from highspeed and high-volume roadways, accessible and inviting transit stops, and traffic calmed neighborhood streets are examples of outcomes to strive for that will support conditions that are inviting and useful for community members. The activity centers, development patterns, and transportation networks identified in the General Plan will serve as a foundation to build from.

Enhance bus stop access.

Desert Hot Springs exhibits a relatively high rate of residents that do not own a personal motor vehicle. The City is also home to the bus top with the fourth highest ridership in the Coachella Valley, located in the southbound direction of West Drive and Pierson Boulevard, where an average of 166 passengers board or alight each day. The rate of DHS residents that commute via public transportation are approximately three times higher than the Riverside County average. This Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

information indicates a significant reliance on public transportation, and in turn, the need for safe and convenient bus stop access.

Connections to regional facilities, adjacent jurisdictions, and destinations.

Desert Hot Springs has the opportunity to strengthen access to the regional transportation and recreation network through improved connections to facilities such as the in-progress CV Link and Dillon Road – an identified corridor in the Desert Recreation District and Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District’s Regional Trails Corridor Study – which provide access to local and regional jobs and destinations beyond the City’s borders. Improved links to trailheads and the area's hiking trail network can provide low-cost, health-promoting access to open space for residents and visitors alike. In addition, enhancing access to the Amtrak station in North Palm Springs would help reduce barriers to using the thrice-weekly service, enabling viable travel across Southern California and the southwestern United States. At present, limited infrastructure and challenging roadway conditions constrain access to these regional facilities and services. Investments in safe and connected routes, supported by wayfinding, will open new opportunities for both everyday travel and recreational mobility.

Address leading collision locations and causes.

Recent data shows that many pedestrian and bicycle collisions in Desert Hot Springs occur along centrally located streets such as Palm Drive, where wide roadway design, high speeds, and limited crossing infrastructure increase exposure risk. Addressing these conditions through traffic calming, high-visibility crosswalks, and other safety-focused design strategies can reduce the likelihood and severity of collisions. In addition to physical improvements, education and enforcement programs can target the most common causes of crashes—such as driver failure to yield or unsafe speeds— and support a culture of safety for all road users. Understanding the safety concerns of community members and agency stakeholders is essential to developing effective solutions that reflect lived experiences and local conditions.
6 Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report

Figure 6.1 - Opportunities and Constraints
Sources: California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2019-2023), SunLine (2025), Caltrans (2025), Strava (2024), Replica (2024), CR Associates (2025) Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Appendix A - Literature Review
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-1
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 City of Desert Hot Springs ............................................................................................................. 4 Three Year Capital Improvement Program (2023) .................................................................................. 4 City of Desert Hot Springs Local Roadway Safety Plan (2022)............................................................... 7 City of Desert Hot Springs General Plan - Mobility and Infrastructure Element (2020) ........................ 8 City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2016) ..................................................10 City of Desert Hot Springs Safe Routes to School Plan (2008) ............................................................15

3.0 Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) ............................................................... 16 CVAG’s CV Link DHS Extension Project (ongoing)..................................................................................16 CVAG Active Transportation Plan (2016)................................................................................................16 CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study (2016)......................................................................19 CVAG’s CV Link Master Plan (2016).......................................................................................................20

4.0 SunLine Transit Agency (STA) .................................................................................................... 22 STA Short Range Transit Plan SRTP FY24-28 (2023) ...........................................................................22

5.0 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) ............................................................... 26 Traffic Relief Plan (2024)........................................................................................................................26 Regional County Long Range Transportation Study (2019)..................................................................28

6.0 Riverside County ........................................................................................................................ 29 Riverside County General Plan - Circulation Element (2020) ...............................................................29 Whitewater River, All American Canal and Dillon Road Regional Trails Corridor Study (2009)..........31

7.0 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) .......................................................... 33 Connect SoCal 2024 (2024)...................................................................................................................33

8.0 State of California (CA) ............................................................................................................... 35 California Streets and Highways Code (ongoing)...................................................................................35 Caltrans’ Strategic Plan 2024-2028 (2024)..........................................................................................36 California Transportation Plan 2050 (2021) .........................................................................................36 Toward an Active California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2017)...............................................39

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-2

1.0 Introduction
This document is a comprehensive review of previously adopted planning studies and documents associated with Desert Hot Springs. This ensures that the development of the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan (ATP) is informed by relevant local, regional, and state-wide plans.

The documents reviewed include those at multiple governing levels:
• Municipal
o City of Desert Hot Springs (DHS)
• Regional, Coachella Valley (CV)
o Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)
o Sunline Transit Authority (STA)
• Regional, County
o Riverside County
• Regional, MPO
o Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • State
o State of California (CA)
Recommendations can then build on existing plans and be informed by the community context and public opinion already rendered as a part of these previous planning efforts. Plans included under this literature review include transportation- and safety- related studies and plans, DHS’s most recent capital improvement plan, regional active transportation projects, County-wide Transportation studies, and state-wide Strategic and Transportation Plans. A total of 19 documents were reviewed.

Reviewed documents include and are presented in the following order:

City of Desert Hot Springs
• Three-Year Capital Improvement Program (2023)
• City of Desert Hot Springs Local Roadway Safety Plan (2022) • General Plan – Mobility and Infrastructure Element (2020) • Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2016)
• Safe Routes to School Plan (2008)
Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)
• CV Link DHS Extension Project (ongoing)
• CVAG Active Transportation Plan (2016)
• Transportation Project Prioritization Study (2016)
• CVAG’s CV Link Master Plan (2016)
Sunline Transit Authority (STA)
• STA Short Range Transit Plan SRTP FY24-28 (2023)
Riverside County Transportation Commission
• Traffic Relief Plan (2024)
• Riverside County Long Range Study (2019)
Riverside County
• County of Riverside General Plan – Circulation Element (2020) • Whitewater River, All American Canal and Dillon Road Regional Trails Corridor Study (2009)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-3
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
• SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: Connect SoCal 2024 (2024)
State of California
• Streets and Highways Code (ongoing)
• Caltrans’ Strategic Plan 2024 – 2028 (2024)
• California Transportation Plan 2050 (2021)
• Toward an Active California State Bicycle + Pedestrian Plan (2017) Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-4

2.0 City of Desert Hot Springs
Three Year Capital Improvement Program (2023)
The Desert Hot Springs Three-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) outlines the capital improvement projects for fiscal years 2023-2026. The CIP is housed with the City’s Adopted Budget for FY 2023-2025 (Digital Budget Book). Details for the CIP-identified projects can be found using the links provided below. The funding schedule by year can be found in the CIP screenshots thereafter.
• Palm Drive Improvements - Camino Aventura to I-10 (3001) • CV Link DHS Extension (3002)
• Hacienda Avenue West Improvements (3003)
• City-wide Annual Slurry Seal (3013)
• 8th Street Sidewalk (3014)
• City-wide Sidewalk, Road, Shoulder Repairs (3015)
• City-wide Annual Striping (3016)
• Palm Drive Signal Safety Improvement - Pierson Blvd to Dillon (3019) • Hacienda Avenue Improvements - Spa Zone (3023)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 11 Safety Improvements (3027) • Two Bunch Palms/Dillon Road Bridges (3028)
• Indian Canyon Bridge (3029)
• Two Bunch Palms & Park (3030)
• Pierson Blvd Resurfacing - Little Morongo to Indian Canyon (3031) • Corporate Yard Park (4000)
• Reflection Park Rehab (4002)
• Wardman Park & Tedesco Park Restrooms (4015)
• Update Master Drainage Plan (6001)
• Line C-1 Storm Drain (6003)
• Police Department Building & Site Improvements (8002) • Police Department Annex Building Construction (8003)
• Fire Station 98 Construction (8004)
• Fire Station 37 Building & Site Improvements (8005)
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-5
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-6
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-7
City of Desert Hot Springs Local Roadway Safety Plan
(2022)
The City of Desert Hot Springs Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), adopted in September of 2022, contains a comprehensive analysis of City-wide roadway safety conditions, including collision types, collision injury and severity, and other collision factors. Emphasis areas were identified by analyzing safety trends and pairing them with community-defined Vision and Goals. The Safety Plan was then developed, resulting in a list of city-wide countermeasures, an evaluation and implementation plan, and project sheets for 10 project case studies. These project extents can be found in the list below, and project sheets can be found in the LRSP detailing the recommended improvements. The citywide countermeasure toolbox can be found in the screenshots below.

A Safety Project Case Study was developed for each of the following locations:

1. Signalized Intersection: Palm Dr & Pierson Blvd

2. Unsignalized Intersection: Palm Dr & Buena Vista Ave

3. Signalized Intersection: Palm Dr & Hacienda Ave

4. Signalized Intersection: Mountain View Rd & Hacienda Ave

5. Signalized Intersection: Palm Dr & Ironwood Dr

6. Signalized Intersection: Palm Dr & Two Bunch Palms Trail

7. Roadway Segment: Palm Dr: Park Ln to Two Bunch Palms Trail

8. Roadway Segment: 5th St: Palm Dr to Cactus Dr

9. Unsignalized Intersection: Cactus Dr & Pierson Blvd

10. Unsignalized Intersection: Sh-62 & Pierson Blvd

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-8

City of Desert Hot Springs General Plan - Mobility and
Infrastructure Element (2020)
The Desert Hot Springs General Plan establishes the policy framework for land use regulations and will guide the City’s decisions regarding investments in public infrastructure and facilities, how to allocate funding for public services, initiatives and strategies to pursue to protect local environmental resources, and the City’s approaches to accommodating multiple mobility modes.

Adopted in 2020, the Desert Hot Springs Mobility and Infrastructure Element of the General Plan provides a comprehensive assessment of transportation conditions and future needs, establishing strategic goals and policies to inform long-term transportation planning and decision-making.

Included as screenshots below are the City’s Pedestrian Plan and Bicycle Plan.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-9
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-10
City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle & Pedestrian Master
Plan (2016)
The City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, adopted in 2016, was developed to provide a roadmap for improving bicycling and walking opportunities in the City. This plan includes prioritized infrastructure projects developed in support of this aim. Project exhibits for the six highest priority projects, including notes, preliminary design drawings, and project location extents are found within the Master Plan. Screenshots of the Project Overview map, Priority Project Map, and Tiers 1 – 3 Bicycle Facilities Maps are presented below.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-11
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-12
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-13
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-14
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-15
City of Desert Hot Springs Safe Routes to School Plan
(2008)
In 2008, the City of Desert Hot Springs embarked on an effort to improve safety for K‐12 students who walk and bicycle to school through a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan. This SRTS Plan was motivated by health benefits of students walking and cycling to school at a time when Desert Hot Springs placed safety as a top priority in the aftermath of student deaths who were hit by cars. The City of Desert Hot Springs also believed that if more students walk or bicycle to school, environmental benefits would result from less driving. Moreover, the City saw a connection between developing safe routes for students and school staff to walk or roll to school and enhancing the quality of life of all City residents.

This Plan provided engineering and planning recommendations for nine schools (elementary, middle, and high schools), and was intended to serve as a blueprint for the City and schools to follow in carrying out a successful SRTS program for all public schools in Desert Hot Springs. Finally, the plan provided a list of projects that the City can use to apply for state and federal funds. Shown below is a screenshot of the Planned Bicycle Facilities Serving Schools that were the focus of this SRTS Plan.

Planned Bicycle Facilities Serving Schools:

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-16

3.0 Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG)
CVAG’s CV Link DHS Extension Project (ongoing)
The DHS CV Link Extension aims to expand the existing CV Link pathway into Desert Hot Springs. This extension will provide residents with safe and efficient routes for walking, biking, and low-speed electric vehicles, promoting alternative transportation options and enhancing connectivity to the broader Coachella Valley network. Planning and design for this project is nearly complete; a construction start date has not yet been identified.

CVAG Active Transportation Plan (2016)
CVAG developed an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) that spans 10 cities and the unincorporated parts of Riverside County. The plan is voluntary but provides a region-wide planned pedestrian and bikeway network. This ATP updates the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan that was first completed in 2001, then updated in 2010, for both regional bikeway plans as well as bicycle plans for each jurisdiction. It contains maps of existing and planned bikeways in this ATP and tables that explain the extents and bikeway types included. The ATP presents goals to provide the context for the specific objectives and policy guidelines. Goals 1 and 2 focus on the bicycle transportation and the pedestrian realm, respectively:

GOAL 1: BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION Provide a friendly environment for bicycling in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys and make bicycling an integral part of the transportation network by implementing and maintaining a connected bikeway network, providing for ancillary facilities, and encouraging bicycling as a convenient and safe mode of transportation for all residents and visitors and for those of all skill levels.

GOAL 2: THE PEDESTRIAN REALM Provide a safe, convenient, and friendly environment for pedestrian movement in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys that includes all users of the pedestrian environment, such as older adults, children, persons with disabilities, tourists, and others.

The ATP provides summaries of active transportation analyses, as well as existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian conditions and plans, for cities within the Coachella Valley. Regarding Desert Hot Springs, at the time this ATP was published, the City had seven existing bikeways and almost four dozen proposed bikeways (see Screenshot of Table 4-11 and Figure 4-12a below). The ATP also identifies proposed bicycle amenities at transit stops, as presented in Table 4-12 below (this data is also presented in Table 6-3, not shown).

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-17
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-18
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-19
CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study (2016) The CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) (2016) presents the results of an analysis of roadway surface conditions, system continuity, level of service, and accident rates throughout Coachella Valley. The resulting scoring is organized into logical, feasible, constructible build projects. CVAG’s Active Transportation Plan (ATP), and active transportation projects, are included in this TPPS. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors developed and approved Ordinance No. 673, establishing the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program for the Coachella Valley. This program imposes fees on future residential, commercial, and industrial developments within the region. The TUMF Program works in conjunction with the 20-year Measure A sales tax initiative, approved by Riverside County voters in November 1988. Beyond fund distribution, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), in collaboration with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), serves as the designated transportation planning agency for the area. CVAG's responsibilities include preparing and adopting a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for the Coachella Valley, facilitated through the Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS), which identifies and ranks key transportation projects across the region.

The projects within the TPPS are fed into a larger regional planning effort by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SCAG’s 2016 RTP includes the majority of projects seen within the TPPS.

The map below depicts the buildable TPPS projects and their scores within Desert Hot Springs. The buildable project extents and names can be found in the pdf, on pages 224-230. Table S-2, on pages 26 – 39 of the TPPS, presents Regional ATP Segments considered in the TPPS.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-20
CVAG’s CV Link Master Plan (2016)
The Coachella Valley (CV) Link is a multi-use trail facility for bicycles, pedestrians, and low-speed electric vehicles that will connect the cities of the Coachella Valley, including an extension to Desert Hot Springs. The purpose of the CV Link Master Plan is to guide the design, construction, and management of the CV Link Project. It is composed of four volumes. Volume One includes nine sections, including an introduction to the project, project background and development, existing conditions and context, design concept, design toolkit, route, implementation, operations and maintenance, and endnotes. Volume Two includes planning and design appendices. Volume Three includes the preliminary plan set. Volume Four is the Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Plan for the Coachella Valley. Below is Figure 2, the CV Link Overview Map and Alignment. Also included below is Figure 33, a map of “community connectors,” which will expand access to the CV Link and facilitate the continuing development of active transportation in Coachella Valley; note that access to Desert Hot Springs’ CV Link Extension includes two community connectors.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-21
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-22

4.0 SunLine Transit Agency (STA)
STA Short Range Transit Plan SRTP FY24-28 (2023)
SunLine Transit Agency’s Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for fiscal years 2024 – 2028 was written to plan for addressing population growth within its Service Area, including a 107% projected growth (2016 – 2045) for Desert Hot Springs. Addressing this projected growth means improving the SunLine’s SunBus, Commuter Link – Regional Commuter, and SunRide – Microtransit services. The SunLine Service Area is presented in Figure 1-2.

Focusing on SunLine bus system, the stop at West/Pierson in Desert Hot Springs ranks in the top 10 of all stops within the Coachella Valley, as presented in Figures 1-26 and 1-27:

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-23
Among the improvements that SunLine is planning to implement at bus stops are shelters. As shown in Figure 3-2, 71% of Desert Hot Springs’ 71 bus stops have shelters. With a policy focused on having shelters at all SunLine bus stops with 10 or more boardings, Figure 3-2 shows that 24 of 26 of such stops have shelter (revealing a policy gap of 2).

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-24
With regard to microtransit, SunLine aims to research and establish innovative multimodal solutions that incorporate easier transfers, connectivity, and reasonable walks to and from nearby bus stops and destinations. Figures 1-11 and 1-14 present an image of a SunRide vehicle and a map of the SunRide system, respectively; these are screenshots from the plan.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-25
Figure 1-14 is a map of the SunRide Pilot Service Area within Desert Hot Springs.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-26

5.0 Riverside County Transportation Commission
(RCTC)
Traffic Relief Plan (2024)
The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) developed the Traffic Relief Plan (Plan) as a countywide transportation blueprint designed to reduce traffic congestion, implement roadway safety measures, and offer greater mobility options for communities across Riverside County. Included below are a list, a map, and map portion highlighting Desert Hot Springs of possible projects that may be funded as a result of this plan.

Highlights of improvements include:
• Improving freeway traffic flow on Interstates (I) and State Routes (SR), including I-10, I-15, I215, SR 60, and SR 91. • Improving traffic flow and safety on major roads including but not limited to Temescal Canyon Road, Cajalco Road, Ramona Expressway, Gilman Springs Road, Grand Avenue, Bob Hope Drive, Fred Waring Drive, Highway 111, and Indian Canyon Drive. • Improving the condition of existing roads by providing funds for basic pothole repairs, paving dirt roads, and synchronizing signals throughout Riverside County. • Adding safety improvements for pedestrians, equestrians, and bicyclists on sidewalks and trails.
• Increasing frequency of and access to bus and rail public transportation by adding new tracks, new stations, more trains, more bus service, bus shelters, safety and security measures, and technology to make public transit safer and more reliable. • Bringing daily rail service to the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass from Los Angeles, Orange County, and Riverside.
• Connecting Riverside County by
o Acquiring right of way for the realigned County Road formerly known as the State Route 79 Realignment Project from the Temecula Valley through Hemet and San Jacinto
o Widening and improving safety on Cajalco Road
o Improving roads between Lake Elsinore and Perris to shorten commutes on I-15 and I-215
o Improving Van Buren Boulevard
o Constructing a bypass to I-10 east of Banning toward the Coachella Valley • Providing more independence for residents who rely on public transportation services, such as seniors, veterans, individuals with disabilities, students, residents or rural communities, and those who choose to use public transportation.
• Using new technologies that can improve the efficiency and safety of current roadway and public transit systems, paving the way for the future.

The Plan references Desert Hot Springs in their summary of active transportation projects, specifically highlighting the CV Link extension to the City.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-27
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-28
Regional County Long Range Transportation Study
(2019)
The goals of the RCTC’s Regional County Long Range Transportation Study (LRTS) are to improve the quality of life for the people of Riverside County (including mode choice, mobility, and access), operational excellence, economic growth, and effective interagency partnership. The LRTS includes active transportation strategies, and notes that the RCTC can work with CVAG on ranking its transportation network in terms of countywide importance, level of completion, and other accessibility and equity metrics to prioritize projects. It also prioritizes safety and security of bicyclists and pedestrians and identifies associated metrics. Short and long-range transportation planning within Riverside County is a key responsibility of RCTC, including coordination and funding of public mass transit service, approval of capital development projects for public transit and highway projects, and the identification of staging and scheduling of project development and construction. A total of 130 State highway and major roadway projects and 57 major local and regional transit projects were identified for inclusion in the LRTS due to their size and/or level of regional significance and are also included in Riverside County’s submittal to SCAG for the 2020 RTP/SCS update. Projects relevant to the Coachella Valley can be found in Figure 61, below.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-29

6.0 Riverside County
Riverside County General Plan - Circulation Element
(2020)
The County of Riverside's Circulation Plan outlines a comprehensive strategy to develop and maintain an efficient, safe, and sustainable transportation network that supports growth and enhances mobility for all users. It emphasizes the integration of various transportation modes, including roadways, public transit, biking, and walking, while addressing safety, environmental sustainability, and equity. Attached below are the Riverside County trails and bikeways system map and the circulation plan, with Desert Hot Springs highlighted in separate screenshots.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-30

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-31
Whitewater River, All American Canal and Dillon Road
Regional Trails Corridor Study (2009)
In 2002, responding to the growing demand for trail development on the Coachella Valley floor, CVAG facilitated the creation of a non-motorized transportation plan for the region. This plan proposed a network of Class II and III bike trails and sidewalk pathways, designed to connect with the proposed Whitewater River and All-American Canal Trails. Subsequently, the County of Riverside Department of Public Health developed the Coachella Valley Urban Trails and Bikeways Map, highlighting safe routes for cyclists and hikers. Building on this and related efforts, the Desert Recreation District and the Riverside County Regional Parks and Open Space District commissioned studies in 2007 to identify trail alignments and connections along the Whitewater River, All American Canal, and Dillon Road corridors. The findings from these studies are documented in the Whitewater River, All American Canal and Dillon Road Regional Trails Corridor Study (Regional Trails Corridor Study).

Most relevant for Desert Hot Springs are the Dillon Road and Whitewater River trails. The maps captured below, Figure 1-4 Dillon Road Corridor, Figure 2-31 Surface Road Bicycle Linkages, Figure 2-32 Hiking and Equestrian Linkages, show the proposed alignments for the trails, two of which intersect with Desert Hot Springs.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-32

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-33

7.0 Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)
Connect SoCal 2024 (2024)
The SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal 2024) is a long-range Regional Transportation Plan, adopted every four years, which establishes and commits to a list of transportation projects and implementation strategies for all modes across the SCAG region, in alignment with county, regional, state and federal goals. Mobility Policies and Strategies in Connect SoCal 2024 include System Preservation and Resilience, Complete Streets, Transit and Multimodal Integration, Transportation Systems Management, Transportation Demand Management, Technology Integration, Safety, and Funding the System/User Fees.

Table 1 from the Plan details every FTIP Project planned for the Coachella Valley region. The portion represented below (screenshot) highlights the projects for Desert Hot Springs.

Priority Development Areas (PDAs) are also identified in Connect SoCal 2024. PDAs are areas within the SCAG region where future growth can be located to reach Plan goals. Generally, people in these areas will have access to multiple modes of transportation or trip origins and destinations will be closer together, allowing for shorter trips. PDAs in Connect SoCal 2024 include Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), Livable Corridors and Spheres of Influence (SOIs).

See the screenshot of a segment of Map 3.4 Priority Development Areas below. The City of Desert Hot Springs, highlighted within the screenshot image below, is identified as an SOI. SOIs are existing or planned service areas within the planning boundary outside of an agency’s legal boundary. The intent of an SOI is to promote the efficient, effective and equitable delivery of local and regional services for existing and future residents and to encourage a collaborative process between agencies. A city will periodically annex parcels in an SOI into the city limits to include new developments or areas with infrastructure needs. Spheres of influence are exclusively found in the unincorporated areas of SCAG’s six counties. Prioritizing unincorporated county growth within existing SOIs discourages urban sprawl and the premature conversion of agricultural and natural lands—and typically makes more efficient use of infrastructure that can reduce costs to taxpayers. As a result, less than 3 percent of the region’s future household growth from 2019 to 2050 will be located in unincorporated areas that are outside of SOIs.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-34
Figure: Excerpt of SCAG Connect SoCal (2024) Priority Development Areas Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-35

8.0 State of California (CA)
California Streets and Highways Code (ongoing)
The California Streets and Highways code is one of over two dozen Codes that contain state statutes.

The Streets and Highways Code contains General Provisions and 19 Divisions. The list below contains links to all Codes within the Streets and Highways Code. • GENERAL PROVISIONS
• DIVISION 1. STATE HIGHWAYS [50 - 897]
• DIVISION 2. COUNTY HIGHWAYS [900 - 1757]
• DIVISION 2.5. CITY STREETS [1800 - 1967.11]
• DIVISION 2.7. COURTESY SIGNS [1970 - 1978]
• DIVISION 3. APPORTIONMENT AND EXPENDITURE OF HIGHWAY FUNDS [2004.5 - 2704.79] • DIVISION 4. THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931 [2800 - 3012]
• DIVISION 4.5. NOTICE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, SPECIAL TAX, AND FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS [3100 - 3124]
• DIVISION 7. THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 [5000 - 6794] • DIVISION 9. CHANGE OF GRADE AND VACATION [8000 - 8363] • DIVISION 10. THE IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915 [8500 - 8887] • DIVISION 11. REFUNDING OF BONDS ISSUED UNDER THE “IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915” [9000 - 9481]
• DIVISION 11.5. REFUNDING ACT OF 1984 FOR 1915 IMPROVEMENT ACT BONDS [9500 - 9707]
• DIVISION 12. THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 [10000 - 10706] • DIVISION 13. PEDESTRIAN MALLS [11000 - 11806]
• DIVISION 14. STREET LIGHTING [18000 - 19402]
• DIVISION 15. TREE PLANTING, LANDSCAPING, AND LIGHTING [22000 - 22679] • DIVISION 16. HIGHWAY DISTRICTS [25000 - 27567]
• DIVISION 17. TOLL FACILITIES AND RELATED MATTERS [30000 - 31490] • DIVISION 18. PARKING [31500 - 36745]
In 2015, California’s bicycle classifications were codified in Article 3, California Bicycle Transportation Act (effective January 1, 2016). See the screenshot below.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-36
Caltrans’ Strategic Plan 2024-2028 (2024)
Caltrans’ Strategic Plan 2024-2028 (CSP) is the organization’s guiding document that presents its top priorities and represents its desired outcomes. The CSP commits to five goals: Safety, Equity, Climate Action, Prosperity, and Employee Excellence. With regard to the first goal, Safety, the CSP adopts the Safe Systems Approach and aims to reduce fatalities and injuries for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. Among the Equity goal outcomes, the CSP aims to reduce transportation disparities and improve multimodal connectivity in underserved communities. To achieve the Climate Action goal, one outcome the CSP is aiming for is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and deploy the strategy of prioritizing transportation projects that provide multimodal options encouraging fewer and shorter car trips. A strategy deployed to achieve the Prosperity goal includes advancing equitable and reliable multi-modal transportation solutions that cultivate healthy and livable communities.

California Transportation Plan 2050 (2021)
The California Transportation Plan (CTP) is California’s long-range transportation plan, which is updated every five years. The CTP aims to provide a policy framework that is designed to close the gap between what California’s RTPs propose and what is needed to meet 2050 targets.

The CTP’s envisions a statewide transportation system that is safe, resilient, and universally accessible and that supports vibrant communities, advances racial and economic justice, and improves public and environmental health. The CTP’s goals and objectives were informed by hundreds of stakeholders across the state. Their input resulted in eight interrelated transportation priorities for the state, each of which is supported by more specific objectives. These goals and objectives informed the analytic process underlying the CTP 2050 and the identification of plan recommendations. The CTP 2050 identified 14 cross-cutting recommendations, which together address each of the goals identified in the CTP 2050 vision. CTP recommendations are presented in the following categories: Safety, Climate, Equity, Accessibility, Quality of Life & Public Health, Environment, Economy, and Infrastructure. Life & Public Health. See the screenshot below.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-37
What follows are highlights of Accessibility and Quality of Life & Public Health within the CTP.

Accessibility in the CTP refers to seamless and connected multimodal mobility, integration of landuse policy with transportation policy, and increasing the competitiveness of transit, shared mobility, and active transportation options. This requires expanding access to airports, transit, first- and lastmile options, biking and walking, and emerging forms of on-demand, shared and dockless mobility, in a way that is safe, affordable, and accessible to people of all ages, incomes, and abilities. The CTP offers various performance measures related to these goals, including percent of travel by non-single occupancy vehicles, access to destinations by mode, households with access to transit service, and other measures.

Accessibility suffers when congestion and delay increase, both of which are a function of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Accessibility improves when people have a range of high-quality transportation options, and when destinations are closer together. Reduced VMT and increased use of non-auto modes means less congestion on roadways, and better access to destinations. Expanded walking, biking, and transit use yields proven economic and environmental benefits, and supports improved public health and quality of life in California communities. Making non-auto modes safe, convenient, and affordable to support this shift, is a core recommendation of the CTP 2050.

See the screenshot below for these themes as they relate to accessibility.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-38
The CTP also emphasizes quality of life and public health in relation to transportation. Quality of life refers to the health, comfort, and happiness experienced by individuals and communities.

Supporting a high quality of life means offering modal choices that meet the diverse needs of California communities, whether that means advancing dockless mobility in dense urban areas, expanding electric vehicle use and on demand options in rural areas, or supporting shared CAVs in suburban communities. This goal also aims to protect public health by ensuring that transportation systems support physical distancing, sanitation, and other measures that prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other illnesses. Among the objectives related to quality of life are: the expansion of access to healthy transportation options, seeking to reduce dependence on the single-occupant vehicle and ensure that people have access to safe and healthy travel options such as biking, walking, and transit; the reduction of household transportation costs; and supporting enjoyable trip experiences and vibrant public spaces (transportation for recreation, art, and public events). The screenshot below summarizes the quality of life and public health aims of the CTP.

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-39
Toward an Active California State Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan (2017)
Toward an Active California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (SBPP) is Caltrans’ first statewide policy-plan to support travel by bicyclists and pedestrians through objectives, strategies, and actions.

This policy direction continues Caltrans’ support for the recent trend of increasing bicycle and pedestrian travel in the state and strengthens the connection between transportation, environmental sustainability, and public health. This plan is an important element of a statewide goal to provide robust multimodal transportation options to everyone in California.

Toward an Active California introduces four new objectives, fifteen strategies, and sixty actions that are specific to active transportation. The objectives are provided below; strategies and actions are described in Chapter 4 and serve as the basis for Plan implementation.

The SBPP objectives are:
• SAFETY: Reduce the number, rate, and severity of bicycle and pedestrian involved collisions • MOBILITY: Increase walking and bicycling in California • PRESERVATION: Maintain a high-quality active transportation system • SOCIAL EQUITY: Invest resources in communities that are most dependent on active transportation and transit
The following table presents how California’s Transportation Plan 2040 Goals are supported by the SBPP:

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix A – Literature Review Page A-40
The closing chapter of the SBPP identifies a number of actions to be implemented. This section describes the actions, responsibilities, expected time frame for implementation, and potential cost (where that can be readily estimated).

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report | Appendix B – Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Inputs Appendix B - Pedestrian Environment Score Inputs
Item Number: 2.

Dillon Rd
10 62
111
Palm Springs
Cathedral
City
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Indian Canyon Dr
Pierson Bl
Palm Dr
Hacienda Av
Mountain View Rd
Long Canyon Rd
Mission Lakes Bl
20th Av
Varner Rd
Karen Av
Worsley Rd
15th Av
Little Morongo Rd
Two Bunch Palms Trail
1110 970
852
1703
1359
1433
786
1575
996
1665
741
1434
779
853
540
918
652
1490
1146
1783 1729
946
1437
551
776
1382
663
1723
1724
880
1438
1835
1670
1690
1655
1129
1519
772
162
1674
847
903
902
848
1644
931
1470
1156
1128
777
167
350
18 1441
573
1667
9141
164
1029
1421
756
1436
1694
126
1019
1581
1543
1693
97 67
1469
724
1548
155
300
85 905
1101
163
165
130
1036
34 1822
1354
1114
32 26
135
29 28
906
33 146
881
930
131
1013
547
466
150
487
792
117
1632
128
158
107
355
1337
1104
499
1524
1590
574
584
27 78
576 132
808
136
354
96 886
571
704
1030
4711
857
129
887
1683
1579
1514
1102
1103
1768
125
285
1617
127
168
1675
1040
345
873 538 1094
56 548
1778
1480
1477
1384
655
1387
1381
1171
1676 1454
1512
659
1832
1668
569
172
1481
1658
1039
964
1383
1287
1491
283
1515
336
1594 1552
1084
1695
505
1765
269
700
500
1024
763
1072
1014
531
119
1771
1464
166
765
1763
1650
834
1520
1626
866
76 467
1147
879 1769
98 901
152
653
771
801
1338
974
1179
92 816
1746
1535
1086
840
1028
1799
1261
714
1417
1180
1530
1764
1004 1003 1002
973972 1033
1263
757
1744
1829
1775
102
81 82
932
917
709
528
1462
1740
471
1599
423
1652
437
434
17971798
1159
1745
103
1615
1260
1800
1743
969
1001
563
1782
564
420
1631
1601
1730
1605
842
1595
1603
526 59
1606
1005
1280
1262
1596
1614
1592
91 1494
1598
565
1747
1558
1136
1257
57 84
1139 1137 1138
535
662
1378
971
60 1037
692
1132
1770
1362
882 31
1587
1794
814
1801
552
660
118
1582
1230
62 77
797
104
1478
503
86 865
1027
688
1015
1704
468
1511
1549
791
697
1551
1553
1160
1528
484
1544
596
1265
196
888
1161
159
1266
870
746
818
1041
795
793
1766
998999
719 767768
976 994
1767
716
751
727
760
1022
718
1431
742
796
1108
699
1642
352
717
5711
831
1154
149
1229
1355
1181
1231
856
93 672
1430
1828
87 1105
1536
740
705
1424
720
1429
1538
1232
956
693
310
15 773
1517
358
712
1654
878 877
1671
347
169
1533
770
685
830
1423 1425
737
1516
450
443
1669
114
459
546
170
411
1109
654
810
1282
1672 1673
154
409
1656
555
445
421465
1646 1645
308
1000
975
410
453
1728
498
1020
1124
1281
1380
1784
1705
783
71 579
357
1643
1446
872
1699
69 100
1123
1116
1448
1341
1007 910
710
1149
507
1023
1451
6711
923
101
657
827
161
781 784
435 493 436
517425 440 426
587 588
515 521 496 501 518520
485
651
788
1148 1150
490 502 419 489 491 492
938
823
476 475 524 525 527 506
1649
731 915 916 919
1457 1458 933 934 935 955
1087 1088 1089 1091 1092
754
590
599
581
1055 1057 1467
943
1056 1059
1153 1151
1090
826
1058
1111
1119
94 824
846 747 778 1557
1537
1152 1531 1532 1572 1573
1692
802
14041403
732
825
845
1143
95 1774
1463
479
1342
911
752
1121
1165
914
1120
855
1115
1447
1006
1450
1125
586
316
1452
1284
1133
589
583
414
1054
904
418
75 937
811
1556
1685
940
813
726
1410
1035
514
580
736
1026
868
758
1574
70 481
553
809
1008
348
891
1432
344
595
156
99 557
448
597
472
486
65 64 147
1640 173
743
174
1584
1651
577
1588
1589
545
554
4 455
38 602
90 585 532
1021
861
1580
1691
457
815
1476
1539
1793
543
698
1585
461
1597
596
558
1653
473
1578
769
1360
1016
1495
422
1017
775
755
745
110
478
1465
509
1038
1647
1106
263
953
876
789
1739
542
452
1689
1591
656
790
309
850
977
1025
1018
1479
1474
674
686
68 912
1521
774
1510
753
1664
1534
892
1541
592
1641
1542
1546
661
482
819
860
148
562
109
871
665
539
449
441
1340
460
708 442
1375
9 1376
625
851
575
875
1112
88 913
706 1482 112
1097
454
1363
694
1496
12 80
1803
812
1498
447
108
315
66 1684
869
750
1749
1093
1409
1314
1264
1312 1313
764
120
1790
1625
1243
884
1031
995
1396
1418
111
1736
14 1555
1752
1586
1830
1416
1754
1831
761
1456
1751
616
859
1394
1753
534
537
833
134
1755
1809
516
1525 582
858
121
926
1540
715
986
867
1735
1208
982
264
1461
1833
992
838
456
1807
959
1779
1813
1808
929
1806 1789
480 424
417
680
522
432
513
981
987
966
1795
991
1488
925
1741
1815
690
960
1244
965
1805
16 1234
89 412
890
160
1386
1358
1357
1235
637
1311
1134
511
1279
1761
416
600 415
598
735
1759
780
785
787
83 950
25 1310
749
835
1777
1317
1330
1408
1406
1405
1449
561
593
1407
1402
896
978
907
1401
944
939
1776
1445
936
1328
462
413
145
1329 1164
1698
1583
1141 1142
832
444
510
1435
1034
533 446
854
433
523
519
512
550
1663
1032
1682
1351
73 536
670
682
679
862
920
1804
829
1750
1696
1627
284
650
464
843
1414
115
954
721
1098
759
1648
116
1254
458
839
1518
265
1613
1612
22 1466
477
1788
1509
1570
1012
61 889
696
79 1344
13 212
1177
549
1734
544
841
924
556
1173
1157
963
21 863
1550
463
1339
17 1009
1554
722
1471
1781
1473
817
744
483
262
1107
1295
1727
1172
591
570
1246
1827
1393
157
1513
885
1787
1733
1061
594
24 35
723
1773
1315
211
748
19 1283
1255
1256
711
1095
1258
738
1259
707
123
1713
560
883
701
671
20 122
1529
469
669 676
807
566
673
151
1455
567
689
504
451
318
317
106 470
1547
74 559
1526
23 766
72 1352
572
1814
864
1826
124
631
1113
1791
979
1748
921
1453
1792
1737
1688
985
1522
1738
1760
762
1816
922
928
989
1422
1468
962
1802
1064
957
1069
1066
1067
677
1053
997
1772
1607
1158
1 1600
604
664
1135
1602
1285
629
1309
632
633
1294
1812
1758
634
678
983
635
988
734
617
733
993
739
1489
836
837
908
927
961
1145
1296
1096
1060
967
1071
1062
1063
1065
1459
1068
1070
568
474
529
530
427
429
431
980
984
990
578
893
1762
430
1044 1122
497
1045
1278
822
821
439
898
495
1046
428
899
1047
494
900
541
1527
820
601
171
725
1780
1726
105
1545
1140
658
1493
687
1011
307
675
133
874
1687
1786
1732
113
1677
1327
153
1483
1472
10 684
1680
30 1293
1010
3431
1209
58 1757
1811
1318
1162
683
1411
213 1144
619
1796
1742
1681
1169
1492
1289
1326
681
1785
1731
1225
1707
1252
1253 1245
1400
1250
1686
1316
1756
1810
356
1817 1818 1825 1819 1823 1824 1820 1821
0 1Mile
PES Score
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
Park
School
Desert Hot
Springs

X,XXX PES ID
PES Segment ID & Score
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
9 PAUL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
10 WEST DR 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0
12 CALLE BARRANCA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 13 CALLE ESCORIAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 14 AVENIDA JALISCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 15 CALLE DEL DIABLO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 16 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 17 VALPARAISO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 18 LA PALOMA LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 19 EL MIRADOR BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 20 PALM DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
21 PALM DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
22 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 23 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 24 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 25 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 26 VALPARAISO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 27 EL MIRADOR BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 28 LA PALOMA LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 29 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
30 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 31 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
32 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 33 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 34 SAN FELIPE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 35 SAN FELIPE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 56 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 57 AVENIDA JALISCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 58 AVENIDA CADENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 59 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
60 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 61 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
62 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
64 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 65 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 66 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 67 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 68 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 69 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 70 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 71 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 72 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 73 AFORTUNADO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 74 CALLE DE VECINOS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 75 BERNARDO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 76 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 77 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 78 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 79 CALLE BARRANCA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 80 CALLE ESCORIAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 81 AVENIDA JALISCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 82 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 83 CALLE DEL DIABLO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 84 AVENIDA JALISCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 85 ALEGRE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 86 AVENIDA JALISCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 87 CALLE DEL DIOS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 88 CALLE DEL DIABLO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 89 AVENIDA SUENOS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 90 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 91 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 92 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 93 CALLE FUNDADOR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 94 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 95 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 96 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 97 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 98 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 99 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 100 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 101 SAN SIMEON DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 102 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 103 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 104 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 105 SAN RAFAEL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 106 SAN SIMEON DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 107 PASATIEMPO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 108 FOXDALE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 109 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 110 SMOKEWOOD CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 111 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 112 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 113 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 114 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 115 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 116 SAN LORENZO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 117 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 118 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 119 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 120 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 121 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 122 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 123 EL MIRADOR BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 124 RAYO DEL SOL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 125 VISTA OESTE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 126 TELIMO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 127 PASATIEMPO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 128 PASATIEMPO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 129 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
130 SAN SIMEON DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 131 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 132 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 133 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 134 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 135 SAN RAFAEL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
136 PALM DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
145 WEST DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
146 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 147 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 148 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 149 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 150 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 151 PUESTA DEL SOL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 152 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 153 FOXDALE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
154 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
155 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
156 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 157 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 158 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 159 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
160 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 161 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 162 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 163 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 164 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 165 VISTA DEL VALLE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 166 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 167 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 168 CASA GRANDE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 169 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 170 VALENCIA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 171 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
172 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
173 SIERRA BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 174 SIERRA BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 211 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 3 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 212 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 3 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 213 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 3 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 262 BLUE SKY CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
263 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 264 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 265 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 269 ROLLING HILLS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
283 ANNANDALE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
284 ANNANDALE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
285 BLUE SKY CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
300 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 307 ROLLING HILLS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
308 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
309 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
310 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
315 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
316 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
317 SALIDA DEL SOL PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
318 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
336 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
344 PUESTA DEL SOL PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
345 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 347 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 348 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 350 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 352 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 354 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 355 SONORA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 356 SIERRA BLVD 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 357 AVENIDA PICO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
358 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
409 CAMINO DEL SOL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
410 CAMINO CAPISTRANO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
411 CAMINO CAPISTRANO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
412 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
413 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 414 SAN LUIS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 415 SAN PABLO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 416 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 417 3RD ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 418 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
419 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
420 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 421 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 422 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 423 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 424 4TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
425 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 426 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 427 3RD ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
428 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
429 2ND ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
430 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
431 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
432 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
433 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
434 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
435 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 436 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 437 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 438 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 439 3RD ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
440 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 441 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
442 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
443 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 444 OCOTILLO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 445 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 446 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 447 SAN DIEGO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 448 SAN LUIS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 449 SAN DIEGO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 450 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3
451 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 452 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 453 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
454 VISTA PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 455 4TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
456 VISTA PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 457 UPLAND WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 458 CRESCENT DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 459 CRESCENT DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 460 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 461 TERRACE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 462 SAN FELIPE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 463 SAN FELIPE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 464 SAN CARLOS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 465 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 466 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 467 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 468 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 469 YUCCA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 470 SAN RAFAEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 471 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 472 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 473 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 474 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
475 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
476 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 477 3RD ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
478 UPLAND WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 479 4TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
480 3RD ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
481 CRESCENT DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 482 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
483 YUCCA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 484 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 485 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
486 4TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
487 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 4
489 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
490 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 491 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 492 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 493 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 494 6TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
495 4TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
496 PALM DR 2 - 3 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
497 2ND ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
498 PALM DR 2 - 2 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
499 TACO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 500 PINTO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 501 PALM DR 2 - 2 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
502 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 503 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 504 SAN BRUNO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 505 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 506 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
507 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
509 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
510 6TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
511 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 512 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
513 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
514 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 515 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
516 6TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
517 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 518 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
519 4TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
520 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
521 PALM DR 2 - 3 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
522 2ND ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
523 2ND ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
524 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3
525 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 4
526 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3
527 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3
528 PALM DR 2 - 3 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
529 6TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
530 4TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
531 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
532 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
533 SAN MARCUS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 534 SAN REMO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 535 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 536 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 537 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 538 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
539 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
540 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
541 7TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
542 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 543 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 544 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 545 SAN MIGUEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 546 SAN MIGUEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 547 SAN MIGUEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 548 SAN MIGUEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 549 SAN JOSE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 550 10TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
551 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
552 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
553 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 554 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
555 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
556 PALM DR 2 - 2 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 4
557 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 558 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 559 14TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
560 SAN JUAN RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 561 SAN JUAN RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 562 SAN JUAN RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 563 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
564 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 565 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 566 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
567 SAN REMO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 568 7TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
569 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 570 YUCCA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 571 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 572 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 573 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 574 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 575 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
576 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
577 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 578 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
579 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 580 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 581 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
582 SAN MARCUS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 583 8TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
584 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
585 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
586 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
587 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
588 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
589 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 0 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
590 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
591 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
592 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
593 12TH ST 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
594 SAN MARCUS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 595 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 596 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 597 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 598 SAN MIGUEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 599 SAN LUIS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 600 SAN PABLO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 601 SANTA ROSA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 602 SANTA CRUZ RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 616 KAREN AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 617 KAREN AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 619 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 625 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 625 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 629 8TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
631 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
632 7TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
633 6TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
634 5TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
635 4TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
637 14TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
650 KAREN AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 651 SAN LUCAS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 652 SAN ARDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 653 VERBENA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 654 SUNSET AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 655 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 656 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 657 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 658 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 659 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 660 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 661 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 662 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 663 MESQUITE AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
664 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 665 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 669 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 670 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 670 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 671 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 672 12TH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
673 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 674 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 675 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 3 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 676 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 677 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 678 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 679 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 680 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 681 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 682 1ST ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
683 QUINTA WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 684 INAJA ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 685 INAJA ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 686 HERMANO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 687 HERMANO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 688 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 689 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 690 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 691 INAJA ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 692 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 693 CUANDO WAY 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 694 CUANDO WAY 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 695 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 696 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 697 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 698 CERRITA WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 699 PEQUENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 700 PEQUENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 701 MONTEREY RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 704 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
705 SARITA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 706 JOSEPH WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 707 SARITA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 708 SUSAN WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 709 SUSAN WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 710 MARK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1
711 NAHUM DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 712 NAHUM DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 714 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 715 CALLE AZTECA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 716 AVENIDA HERMOSA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 717 CALLE CERRITO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 718 CALLE BLANCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 719 AVENIDA HERMOSA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 720 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 721 ACACIA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 722 DON ENGLISH WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 723 CALLE CERRITO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 724 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
725 VIA DOMINGO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 726 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 727 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 731 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
732 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 733 MIRACLE HILL RD 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 -1 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 734 MIRACLE HILL RD 2 - 2 - 30 2 -1 -1 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 735 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 736 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 737 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 738 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 739 SUMAC DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 740 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
741 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 742 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 743 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 744 MAUI WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 745 MAUI WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 746 CASA LOMA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 747 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 748 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 749 FOXDALE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 750 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 751 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 752 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 753 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 754 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 755 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 756 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 757 REPOSO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 758 REPOSO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 759 CATALPA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 760 SKYLINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 761 AVENIDA SERENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 762 HIGHLAND AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 763 HIGHLAND AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 764 SPRUCE ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 765 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 766 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 767 AVENIDA HERMOSA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 768 AVENIDA HERMOSA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 769 CALLE CERRITO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 770 VIA DOMINGO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 771 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 772 ORO LOMO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 773 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 774 MONTERICO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 775 INAJA ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 776 MONTERICO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 777 EL NIDO PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 778 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
779 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 780 LA SALLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 781 ROCHELLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 783 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 784 ROCHELLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 785 CASA LOMA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 786 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 787 MAUI WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 788 ROCHELLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 789 ALAMEDA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 790 ALAMEDA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 791 QUINTA WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 792 HERMANO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 793 ARENA BLANCA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 795 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 796 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 797 ARENA BLANCA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 801 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
802 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
807 MIRACLE HILL RD 3 - 2 - 30 2 -1 -1 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 808 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 809 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 810 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 811 LOMA VISTA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 812 CUANDO WAY 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 813 CUANDO WAY 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 814 CUANDO WAY 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 815 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 816 PINNACLE CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
817 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 818 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 -1 0* 1 0 0 0 1 2
819 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 820 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 821 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 822 ESTRELLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
823 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 824 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
825 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 4

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 826 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 827 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
829 CALLE BONITA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 830 AVENIDA SERENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 831 AVENIDA SERENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 832 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 833 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 834 MONTEREY RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 835 AMBROSIO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 836 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 837 FOXDALE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 838 TAMAR DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 839 SUMAC DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 840 PARMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 841 PARMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 842 PARMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 843 CASA LOMA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 845 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 846 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 847 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 848 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 850 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 851 SAN FIDEL WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 852 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 853 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 854 SKYLINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 855 FERNWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 856 SKYLINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 857 FERNWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 858 CALLE CALMOSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 859 AVENIDA LA VISTA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 860 AVENIDA LA VISTA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 861 AVENIDA LA VISTA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 862 QUINTA WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 863 INAJA ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 864 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 865 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 866 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 867 ELISEO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 868 REPOSO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 869 REPOSO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 870 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 871 ORO LOMO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 872 TUNITAS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 873 TUNITAS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 874 CUANDO WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 875 DEODAR AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 876 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 877 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 878 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 879 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 880 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 881 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 882 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 883 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 884 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
885 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
886 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
887 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 888 HIDALGO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 889 SKYLINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 890 E ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 891 E ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 892 E ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 893 SANTA YSABEL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 896 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 898 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
899 EL RIO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 900 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 901 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 902 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
903 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
904 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 905 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 906 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
907 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 908 POMELO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 910 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 911 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 912 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 913 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 914 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
915 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
916 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
917 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
918 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
919 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
920 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
921 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
922 ESTRELLA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
923 ESTRELLA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 924 ESTRELLA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
925 ESTRELLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 926 ESTRELLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 927 ESTRELLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 928 FLORA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
929 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
930 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
931 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
932 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
933 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
934 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
935 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
936 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 937 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 938 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
939 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 940 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 943 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
944 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 946 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 950 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 953 FLORA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 954 FLORA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
955 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
956 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
957 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
959 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 960 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 961 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 962 GRANADA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
963 GRANADA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 964 GRANADA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 965 GRANADA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 966 GRANADA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 967 GRANADA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 969 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 970 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 971 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 972 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 973 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 974 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 975 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 976 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 977 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
978 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 979 ACOMA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
980 ACOMA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
981 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 982 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 983 ACOMA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 984 BUENA VISTA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
985 BUENA VISTA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
986 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 987 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 988 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 989 CAHUILLA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
990 CAHUILLA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
991 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 992 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 993 CAHUILLA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 994 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 995 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 996 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 997 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 CLT 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 998 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 999 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1000 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1001 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1002 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1003 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1004 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1005 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1006 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1007 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1008 ARENA BLANCA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1009 CIELO AZUL WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1010 MONTEREY RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1011 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1012 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1013 AVENIDA HERMOSA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1014 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1015 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
1016 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
1017 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1018 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1019 W ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1020 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
1021 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1022 CALLE CERRITO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1023 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1024 DEODAR AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1025 DEODAR AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1026 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1027 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1028 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1029 HIGHDALE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1030 JUNIPER DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1031 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1032 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1033 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1034 CALLE LAS TIENDAS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1035 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1036 MONTERICO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1037 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1038 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1039 SPRUCE ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1040 SPRUCE ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1041 BIRCH RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1044 DEL RAY LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1045 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1046 EL RIO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1047 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1053 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1054 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1055 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1056 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1057 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1058 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1059 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1060 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1061 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1062 CUYAMACA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1063 JULIAN DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1064 JULIAN DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1065 RAMONA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1066 RAMONA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1067 EL CAJON DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1068 EL CAJON DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1069 LA MESA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1070 LA MESA DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1071 CALIENTE DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1072 JOSEPH WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1084 PALM DR 2 - 3 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1086 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1087 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1088 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1089 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1090 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1091 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1092 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1093 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1094 RICHARD WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1095 MARK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1096 LUIS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1097 CALIENTE DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1098 CALIENTE DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1101 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1102 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1103 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1104 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1105 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1106 MONTERICO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1107 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1108 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1109 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1110 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1111 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1112 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1113 CALLE BLANCO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1114 CALLE CERRITO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1115 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1116 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1119 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1120 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1121 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1122 DEL RAY LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1123 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1124 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1125 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1128 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1129 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1132 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1133 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1134 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1135 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1136 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1137 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1138 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1139 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1140 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1141 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1142 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1143 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1144 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1145 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1146 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1147 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 4
1148 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1149 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1150 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1151 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1152 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4
1153 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1154 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1156 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1157 MAUNA LOA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1158 ELAINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1159 SYCAMORE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1160 NANCY DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1161 FLORENCE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1162 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1164 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1165 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1169 CALLE DE LOS ROMOS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1171 AVA CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1172 AVA CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1173 NICOLE CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1174 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1175 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1176 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1177 WHITNEY CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1179 BUBBLING WELLS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1180 TARBUTTON RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1181 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1208 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1209 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1225 18TH AVE 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1229 CAMINO AVENTURA 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1230 CAMINO AVENTURA 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1231 CAMINO AVENTURA 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1232 CAMINO AVENTURA 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1234 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1235 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1243 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1244 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1245 VARNER RD 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1246 WEST DR 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1250 VARNER RD 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1252 21ST AVE 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1253 THORNTON RD 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1254 CAROL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1255 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1256 ELAINE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1257 SYCAMORE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1258 FLORENCE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1259 ANGELA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1260 SYCAMORE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1261 CAROL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1262 SYCAMORE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1263 NANCY DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1264 SYCAMORE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1265 CAROL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1266 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1278 AVENIDA DESCANSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1279 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1280 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1281 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1282 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1283 SAN RAFAEL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1284 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1285 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1287 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1289 19TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1293 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1294 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1295 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1296 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1309 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1310 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1311 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1312 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1313 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1314 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1315 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1316 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1317 CABOT RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1318 SAN JACINTO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1326 18TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1327 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1328 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1329 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1330 LITTLE MORONGO RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1337 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1338 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1339 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1340 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1341 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1342 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1343 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1344 ALEXANDRIA CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1351 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1352 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1354 TENTH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1355 TENTH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1357 AVALON PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1358 AURORA PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1359 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1360 TWELFTH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1362 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1363 AVALON PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1375 AURORA PL 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1376 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1378 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1380 AVONDALE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1381 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1382 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1383 ARGONNE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1384 ARGONNE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1386 GOLDEN EAGLE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1387 TENTH ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1393 PARK LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
1394 SAN GORGONIO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1396 SAN GORGONIO ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1400 20TH AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1401 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1402 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1403 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1404 FLORA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1405 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1406 BRITTANY RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1407 SYLVANUS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1408 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1409 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1410 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1411 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1414 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1416 SAN ANDREAS ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1417 YERXA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1418 SAN ANDREAS ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1419 BUBBLING WELLS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1421 TARBUTTON RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1422 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1423 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
1424 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1425 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1429 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1430 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1431 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1432 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1433 TARBUTTON RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1434 BUBBLING WELLS RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1435 CAMINO CAMPANERO 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1436 YERXA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1437 BUBBLING WELLS RD 3 - 2 - 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1438 TARBUTTON RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1441 YERXA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1445 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
1446 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
1447 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1448 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1449 SYLVANUS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1450 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1451 BUENA VISTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1452 VIA LORETO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
1453 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1454 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1455 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1456 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1457 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1458 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1459 CACTUS DR 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1461 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1462 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1463 VERBENA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1464 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1465 ORIS WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1466 AVENIDA ALTA LOMA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1467 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1468 CUYAMACA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1469 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1470 IRONWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1471 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1472 CLUB CIRCLE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1473 CALLE LAS TIENDAS 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1474 CALLE DESCANSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1476 E ARROYO DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1477 RIDGE CREST WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1478 RIDGE CREST WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1479 RIDGE CREST WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1480 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1481 HACIENDA HEIGHTS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1482 PROMONTORY ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1483 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1488 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1489 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1490 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1491 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1492 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1493 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1494 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1495 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1496 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1498 AVENIDA DESCANSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1509 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1510 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1511 PROSPECT WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1512 ALPINE CIR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1513 OVERLOOK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1514 OVERLOOK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1515 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1516 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1517 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1518 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 4
1519 PANORAMA CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1520 PANORAMA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1521 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1522 SANTA YSABEL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1524 WEST DR 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
1525 MESQUITE AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1526 CALLE AZTECA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1527 BEECH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1528 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1529 CATALPA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1530 OCOTILLO RD 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1531 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4
1532 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4
1533 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1534 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1535 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1536 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1537 SUMAC DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1538 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1539 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1540 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1541 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1542 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1543 ELM AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1544 REDBUD RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1545 DEODAR AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1546 CALLE BOLSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1547 MCCARGER RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
1548 MCCARGER RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1549 MOUNTAIN TOP CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1550 MOUNTAIN TOP CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1551 OASIS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1552 PROSPECT WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1553 PROSPECT WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1554 HACIENDA HEIGHTS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1555 MONUMENT ST 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1556 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1557 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1558 HACIENDA AVE 2 - 2 - 40 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1570 AVENIDA DESCANSO 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1572 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4
1573 DESERT VIEW AVE 2 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1574 PEAK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1575 AVENIDA LA VISTA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1578 QUINTA WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1579 MIRACLE HILL RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1580 MIRACLE HILL RD 3 - 2 - 30 2 -1 -1 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1581 HACIENDA HEIGHTS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1582 HACIENDA HEIGHTS DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1583 MCCARGER RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 3
1584 MOUNTAIN TOP CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1585 OVERLOOK DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1586 STARLIGHT WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1587 VALLEY VIEW CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1588 AVENIDA LA VISTA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1589 SUMMIT VIEW CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1590 CALLE AMAPOLA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1591 AVENIDA SERENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 0 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1592 FERNWOOD DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1594 KEY WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1595 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1596 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1597 NANCY DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1598 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1599 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1600 CAROL DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1601 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1602 ANGELA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1603 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1604 FLORENCE DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1605 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1606 MAPLE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1607 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1612 NANCY DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1613 MAUNA LOA RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1614 MOJAVE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1615 MOJAVE RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1617 RIDGE CREST WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1625 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1626 DESERT VIEW AVE 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1627 AUGUA CAYENDO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1631 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1632 16TH AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1640 SIERRA BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1641 SUERTE WAY 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1642 EL RIO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1643 EL RIO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1644 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1645 DEL RAY LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1646 DEL RAY LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1647 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1648 AVENIDA CADENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1649 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1650 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1651 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1652 AVENIDA LADERA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1653 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1654 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1655 AVENIDA DELORES 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1656 AVENIDA DELORES 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1658 PIERSON BLVD 3 - 6 - 25 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1663 AVENIDA CADENA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1664 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1665 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1667 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1668 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1669 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1670 AVENIDA BARONA 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1671 EL RIO LN 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1672 AVENIDA PICO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1673 AVENIDA PICO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1674 ORO CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1675 VIA REAL 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1676 DEL RAY CT 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1677 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1680 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1681 N INDIAN CANYON DR 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1682 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1683 AVENIDA DORADO 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1684 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1685 CHOLLA DR 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1686 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 Raised 55 0 -1 0 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1687 PIERSON BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1688 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1689 PIERSON BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1690 PIERSON BLVD 3 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1691 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1692 AUGUSTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1693 AUGUSTA AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1694 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1695 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
1696 LITTLE MORONGO RD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1698 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1699 ATLANTIC AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1703 MISSION LAKES BLVD 2 - 2 - 45 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1704 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1705 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 3 - 2 - 35 1 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1707 KAREN AVE 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1713 DILLON RD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1723 PIERSON BLVD 2 - 2 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1724 PIERSON BLVD 3 - 2 - 25 3 -1 -1 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1726 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1727 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 55 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0
1728 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0
1729 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1730 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0
1731 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1732 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1733 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1734 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1735 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 1736 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
1737 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1738 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 1739 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1740 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1741 HACIENDA AVE 2 Yes 4 Raised 40 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1742 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1743 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
1744 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1745 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1746 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1747 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1748 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
1749 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1750 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
1751 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1752 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 1 1 1753 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1754 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1755 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1756 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1757 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1758 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1759 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1760 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1761 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1762 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1763 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1764 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1765 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1766 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1767 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1768 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1769 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1770 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1771 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1772 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1773 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1774 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1775 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1776 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1777 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1778 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1779 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1780 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1781 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1782 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0
1783 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1784 PALM DR 2 Yes 6 - 55 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0
1785 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1786 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1787 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1788 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1789 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1790 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
1791 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1792 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 1793 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1794 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
1795 HACIENDA AVE 2 Yes 4 Raised 40 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1796 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 - 50 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1797 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1798 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
1799 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
1800 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1801 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1802 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
1803 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
1804 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
1805 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1806 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1807 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 1808 PIERSON BLVD 2 Yes 4 Raised 45 0 0 -1 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Segment Inputs
PES ID Roadway Name from
Centerline
Roadway
Classification
Dual
Carriageway
Number
of Lanes Median
Posted
Speed
(mph)
PES
Base
Score
Clear Pedestrian
Zone/Presence of
Sidewalk
Standard
Street
Lighting
PES Base Score
+ Essential
Categories
Horizontal
Separation
>14'
Pedestrian
Scale
Lighting
Sidewalk
Wider
than 8'
Traffic
Calming
Treatments
Tree
Canopy
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 1809 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1810 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1811 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1812 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 60 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1813 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1814 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1815 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1816 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1817 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1818 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1819 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1820 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1821 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1822 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1823 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1824 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1825 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1826 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1827 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1828 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 40 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1829 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 35 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
1830 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
1831 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 CLT 50 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
1832 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 Yes 4 - 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1833 PALM DR 2 Yes 4 Raised 55 0 -1 -1 0* n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 1835 TWO BUNCH PALMS TRL 2 - 2 - 35 1 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 CLT = Center Left-Turn
Raised = Raised Median
0* = Score of 0 was assigned. "Base Score + Essential Categories" cannot be a negative value. n/a = Category was not evaluated due to the absence of a sidewalk.

Item Number: 2.

19 59
56 45
49 18
33 41
60 68
42 5
71 6
65 43
8 85
14 9
1 75
17 40
69 10
52 67
46 34
38 16
13 89
62 80
25 11
48 77
35 54
44 36
57 21
15 78
47 58
66 29
55 61
82 87
39 2
30 53
74 20
37 22 31 32 28
88 79
26 27
7 63 64
12 70
76 3
4 51
23 83
73 72
86 24
50 81
84 0 1Mile
Dillon Rd
10 62
111
Palm Springs
Cathedral
City
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Indian Canyon Dr
Pierson Bl
Palm Dr
Hacienda Av
Mountain View Rd
Long Canyon Rd
Mission Lakes Bl
20th Av
Varner Rd
Karen Av
Worsley Rd
15th Av
Little Morongo Rd
Two Bunch Palms Trail
PES Score
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
Park
School
Desert Hot
Springs
PES Intersection ID & Score
Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Intersection Inputs
PES
Intersection
ID
Intersection Location Leg
Location Crosswalk Type Control Type
Number of
Crossing
Lanes
PES
Base
Score
Curb
Type
Curb
Type
Value
Daylighting
at Corners
PES Base
Score +
Essential
Categories
Scramble Raised
Crosswalk
No Turn
on Red
or LPI
Curb
Extension
or Median
Refuge
High
Visbility
Crosswalk
with Stop
Bar or
RRFB
Pedestrian
Signal
Enhancements*
PES
Final
Score
1 West Drive & Avenida Jalisco West Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Indian Canyon Road & Mission Lakes Blvd East Standard Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 Little Morongo Road & Mission Lakes Blvd South Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 Little Morongo Road & Mission Lakes Blvd East Standard Stop 3 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 West Drive & Mission Lakes Boulevard West Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 West Drive & 14th Street West Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 West Drive & 12th Street West Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 Palm Drive & 12th Street North High-Vis (White) Stop 3 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 Palm Drive & 12th Street East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 Palm Drive & 12th Street South High-Vis (White) Stop 3 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 Palm Drive & 12th Street West High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 West Drive & 8th Street West Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 8th Street & Cactus Drive North High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 8th Street & San Pablo Road North High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 8th Street & San Miguel Road North High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 Palm Drive & 8th Street North High-Vis (White) Stop 3 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 Palm Drive & 8th Street East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 Palm Drive & 8th Street South High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 Palm Drive & 8th Street West High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 West Drive & 4th Street North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 West Drive & 4th Street East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 West Drive & 4th Street South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 13 West Drive & 4th Street West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 West Drive and 3rd Street South High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 West Drive and 3rd Street East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15 Golden Eagle Way & Osprey Lane South High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 Cholla Drive & Desert Hot Springs HS South Standard Free 2 2 Missing -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 West Drive & 2nd Street South High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 West Drive & 2nd Street East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18 Golden Eagle Way & Desert Hot Springs HS East Standard Free 2 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 Pierson Boulevard & Skyborne Drive North Standard Protected 1 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 Pierson Boulevard & Skyborne Drive North Standard Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20 Pierson Boulevard & Karen Avenue West Standard Protected 3 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20 Pierson Boulevard & Karen Avenue North Standard Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 Pierson Boulevard & Little Morongo Road West Unmarked Stop 3 2 Missing -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 Pierson Boulevard & Little Morongo Road South Unmarked Stop 2 3 Missing -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 Pierson Boulevard & Little Morongo Road East Unmarked Stop 4 1 Missing -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Pierson Boulevard & Little Morongo Road North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Missing -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 Pierson Boulevard & Atlantic Avenue South High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 3 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22 Pierson Boulevard & Atlantic Avenue East High-Vis (Yellow) Permissive 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 22 Pierson Boulevard & Atlantic Avenue North High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23 Pierson Boulevard & Via Loreto South Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 Pierson Boulevard & Cholla Drive West High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 Pierson Boulevard & Cholla Drive South High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 24 Pierson Boulevard & Cholla Drive East High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 Pierson Boulevard & Cholla Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 25 Pierson Boulevard & Via Real South Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 26 Pierson Boulevard & West Drive West Decorative Permissive 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 Pierson Boulevard & West Drive South Decorative Protected 3 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 26 Pierson Boulevard & West Drive East Decorative Permissive 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 Pierson Boulevard & West Drive North Decorative Protected 3 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 Pierson Boulevard & Cactus Drive West Standard Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 Pierson Boulevard & Cactus Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 Pierson Boulevard & Cactus Drive East Standard Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 Pierson Boulevard & Cactus Drive North Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 Pierson Boulevard & Palm Drive West High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 28 Pierson Boulevard & Palm Drive South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 28 Pierson Boulevard & Palm Drive East High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 28 Pierson Boulevard & Palm Drive North High-Vis (White) Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 29 Pierson Boulevard & Ocotillo Road West Unmarked Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Pierson Boulevard & Ocotillo Road South Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 Pierson Boulevard & Ocotillo Road East Unmarked Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Pierson Boulevard & Ocotillo Road North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30 Pierson Boulevard & Mesquite Avenue West Unmarked Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Intersection Inputs
PES
Intersection
ID
Intersection Location Leg
Location Crosswalk Type Control Type
Number of
Crossing
Lanes
PES
Base
Score
Curb
Type
Curb
Type
Value
Daylighting
at Corners
PES Base
Score +
Essential
Categories
Scramble Raised
Crosswalk
No Turn
on Red
or LPI
Curb
Extension
or Median
Refuge
High
Visbility
Crosswalk
with Stop
Bar or
RRFB
Pedestrian
Signal
Enhancements*
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 30 Pierson Boulevard & Mesquite Avenue South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30 Pierson Boulevard & Mesquite Avenue East Standard Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Pierson Boulevard & Mesquite Avenue North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 31 Pierson Boulevard & First Street North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 Pierson Boulevard & Verbena Drive West Standard Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Pierson Boulevard & Verbena Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 Pierson Boulevard & Verbena Drive East Unmarked Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Pierson Boulevard & Verbena Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 33 Pierson Boulevard & Ambrosio Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 Missing -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 Palm Drive & Acoma Avenue South Unmarked Free 4 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Palm Drive & Acoma Avenue East Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 Palm Drive & Acoma Avenue North Unmarked Free 3 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Palm Drive & Acoma Avenue West Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35 Palm Drive & Buena Vista Avenue North Unmarked Free 4 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 35 Palm Drive & Buena Vista Avenue East Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35 Palm Drive & Buena Vista Avenue South Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 35 Palm Drive & Buena Vista Avenue West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36 Palm Drive & Cahuilla Avenue North Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 Palm Drive & Cahuilla Avenue East Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36 Palm Drive & Cahuilla Avenue South Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 Palm Drive & Cahuilla Avenue West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 37 Palm Drive & Desert View Avenue North High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 Palm Drive & Desert View Avenue West High-Vis (White) Permissive 3 2 ADA 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 37 Palm Drive & Desert View Avenue South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 Palm Drive & Desert View Avenue East High-Vis (White) Permissive 3 2 ADA 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 38 Desert View Avenue & Ocotillo Road North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 Desert View Avenue & Ocotillo Road South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 Desert View Avenue & Mesquite Avenue North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 Desert View Avenue & Mesquite Avenue East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 Desert View Avenue & Mesquite Avenue South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 Desert View Avenue & Mesquite Avenue West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 Desert View Avenue & Verbena Drive South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 40 Desert View Avenue & Verbena Drive East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 40 Desert View Avenue & Verbena Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 Desert View Avenue & Ambrosio Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 Desert View Avenue & Pomelo Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 Desert View Avenue & Foxdale Drive West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 Desert View Avenue & Foxdale Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 44 Palm Drive & Estrella Avenue North Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Palm Drive & Estrella Avenue East Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 44 Palm Drive & Estrella Avenue South Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 Palm Drive & Estrella Avenue West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 45 Verbena Drive & Estrella Avenue West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 46 Palm Drive & Flora Avenue North Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 46 Palm Drive & Flora Avenue East Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 46 Palm Drive & Flora Avenue South Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 46 Palm Drive & Flora Avenue West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 47 Verbena Drive & Flora Avenue West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 47 Verbena Drive & Flora Avenue South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 48 Palm Drive & Granada Avenue North Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 48 Palm Drive & Granada Avenue East Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 48 Palm Drive & Granada Avenue South Unmarked Free 5 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 48 Palm Drive & Granada Avenue West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 49 Verbena Drive & Granada Avenue West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 50 Hacienda Avenue & West Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 50 Hacienda Avenue & West Drive East Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 50 Hacienda Avenue & West Drive North Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 50 Hacienda Avenue & West Drive West Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 51 Hacienda Avenue & Palm Drive North High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 51 Hacienda Avenue & Palm Drive East High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 51 Hacienda Avenue & Palm Drive South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 51 Hacienda Avenue & Palm Drive West High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 52 Hacienda Avenue & Ocotillo Road East High-Vis (Yellow) Free 3 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 52 Hacienda Avenue & Ocotillo Road South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Intersection Inputs
PES
Intersection
ID
Intersection Location Leg
Location Crosswalk Type Control Type
Number of
Crossing
Lanes
PES
Base
Score
Curb
Type
Curb
Type
Value
Daylighting
at Corners
PES Base
Score +
Essential
Categories
Scramble Raised
Crosswalk
No Turn
on Red
or LPI
Curb
Extension
or Median
Refuge
High
Visbility
Crosswalk
with Stop
Bar or
RRFB
Pedestrian
Signal
Enhancements*
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 53 Hacienda Avenue & Mesquite Avenue South Standard Stop 2 3 Missing -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 53 Hacienda Avenue & Mesquite Avenue East Standard Stop 2 3 Missing -1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 54 Hacienda Avenue & Verbena Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 54 Hacienda Avenue & Verbena Drive East High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 55 Hacienda Avenue & Mountain View Road West Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 55 Hacienda Avenue & Mountain View Road North Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 55 Hacienda Avenue & Mountain View Road East Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 55 Hacienda Avenue & Mountain View Road South Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 56 Hacienda Avenue & Julius Corsini ES South High-Vis (Yellow) Free 1 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 56 Hacienda Avenue & Julius Corsini ES East High-Vis (Yellow) Free 1 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 56 Hacienda Avenue & Julius Corsini ES North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 56 Hacienda Avenue & Julius Corsini ES North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 1 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 57 West Drive & Ironwood Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 57 West Drive & Ironwood Drive East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 57 West Drive & Ironwood Drive South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 57 West Drive & Ironwood Drive West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 58 Palm Drive & Ironwood Drive North High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 58 Palm Drive & Ironwood Drive South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 58 Palm Drive & Ironwood Drive East High-Vis (White) Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 58 Palm Drive & Ironwood Drive West High-Vis (White) Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 59 Caliente Drive East Decorative Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 60 Palm Drive West Decorative Free 2 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 61 Two Bunch Palms Trail & West Drive West Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 61 Two Bunch Palms Trail & West Drive North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 61 Two Bunch Palms Trail & West Drive East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 4 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 61 Two Bunch Palms Trail & West Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 62 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Ysabel Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 63 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Cuyamaca Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 64 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Julian Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 64 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Julian Drive East Unmarked Free 4 1 ADA 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Julian Drive West Unmarked Free 4 1 ADA 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Julian Drive South Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 65 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Ramona Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 66 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Cactus Drive North Standard Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 66 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Cactus Drive East Standard Stop 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 66 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Cactus Drive South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 66 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Cactus Drive West Standard Stop 4 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 67 Two Bunch Palms Trail & El Cajon Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 68 Two Bunch Palms Trail & La Mesa Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 69 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Caliente Drive North Unmarked Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 70 Palm Drive & Two Bunch Palms Trail North High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 70 Palm Drive & Two Bunch Palms Trail West High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 70 Palm Drive & Two Bunch Palms Trail South High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 70 Palm Drive & Two Bunch Palms Trail East High-Vis (Yellow) Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 71 Mesquite Avenue & Ocotillo Road West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 71 Mesquite Avenue & Ocotillo Road North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 71 Mesquite Avenue & Ocotillo Road East High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 71 Mesquite Avenue & Ocotillo Road South High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 72 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Ocotillo Road West High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 72 Two Bunch Palms Trail & Ocotillo Road North High-Vis (Yellow) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 72 Desert Springs Middle School South High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 73 Palm Drive & Park Lane East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 74 Palm Drive & Camino Campanero East High-Vis (White) Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 74 Palm Drive & Camino Campanero South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 75 Bubbling Wells Road & San Tomas Street West High-Vis (Yellow) Free 2 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 75 Bubbling Wells Road & San Tomas Street South Standard Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 76 Palm Drive & Palm Drive East Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 77 Palm Drive & Camino Campesino East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 78 Little Morongo Road & Morongo Industrial East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 79 Palm Drive & Camino Aventura East High-Vis (White) Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 79 Palm Drive & Camino Aventura North High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 80 Palm Drive & Camino Idilio East Unmarked Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 81 Palm Drive & Dillon Road North High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 81 Palm Drive & Dillon Road East High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3

Item Number: 2.

Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Existing Conditions Report
Appendix B:

Pedestrian Environment Score (PES) Intersection Inputs
PES
Intersection
ID
Intersection Location Leg
Location Crosswalk Type Control Type
Number of
Crossing
Lanes
PES
Base
Score
Curb
Type
Curb
Type
Value
Daylighting
at Corners
PES Base
Score +
Essential
Categories
Scramble Raised
Crosswalk
No Turn
on Red
or LPI
Curb
Extension
or Median
Refuge
High
Visbility
Crosswalk
with Stop
Bar or
RRFB
Pedestrian
Signal
Enhancements*
PES
Final
Score
Base Score Criteria Essential Categories Bonus Categories 81 Palm Drive & Dillon Road West High-Vis (White) Protected 4 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 81 Palm Drive & Dillon Road South High-Vis (White) Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 82 Indian Canyon Road & Coachillin Way East High-Vis (White) Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 83 Indian Canyon Drive & 19th Avenue East High-Vis (White) Stop 2 3 Ramp 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 84 Indian Canyon Drive & 20th Avenue North Standard Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 85 Indian Canyon Drive & 10 WB FWY On Ramp West Standard Free 1 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 86 Palm Drive & Varner Road West Standard Protected 0 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 86 Palm Drive & Varner Road East Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 86 Palm Drive & Varner Road North Standard Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 86 Palm Drive & Varner Road South Unmarked Protected 5 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 87 Palm Drive & Paul Road West Standard Protected 2 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 87 Palm Drive & Paul Road East Standard Protected 2 3 Ramp 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 87 Palm Drive & Paul Road North Standard Permissive 4 1 ADA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 87 Palm Drive & Paul Road South Unmarked Permissive 4 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 88 Palm Drive & 10 WB FWY On Ramp West High-Vis (White) Free 1 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 88 Palm Drive & 10 WB FWY Off Ramp East Standard Free 3 1 Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 88 Palm Drive & 10 WB FWY Off Ramp East High-Vis (White) Free 1 2 Ramp 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 89 N Gene Autry Trail & 10 FWY EB Off Ramp West Standard Protected 3 3 ADA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 89 N Gene Autry Trail & 10 FWY WB On Ramp East High-Vis (White) Free 1 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 89 N Gene Autry Trail & 10 FWY EB On Ramp West High-Vis (White) Free 1 2 ADA 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Notes:
*Pedestrian Signal Enhancements include: Audible, Automated, and Countdown Pedestrian Signal Heads LPI = Leading Pedestrian Interval
RRFB = Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
High-Vis (White) = High-Visibility Crosswalk with White Paint High-Vis (Yellow) = High-Visibility Crosswalk with Yellow Paint

Item Number: 2.

B
Community Engagement
Summaries
Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan Draft
Item Number: 2.

Outreach Phase I
Item Number: 2.

CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Pop-Up #1 Event Summary
Event: Little League Opening Day at Wardman Park
Date: Saturday, March 15, 2025, from 8:30am – 1:00pm
Staff: Judith Duenas (DHS), Lynne Paul (DHS), Keith Paul (DHS), Zeltzin Angon (CRA), and Lars Christiansen (CRA) Event Overview
The initial pop-up event in support of the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan (ATP) sought to leverage the draw of the Little League Opening Day Ceremonies and baseball games, as well as regular Wardman Park users.

The pop-up event served to:
• Inform community members about the ATP, including the project overview, schedule, project website, and how to stay involved
• Encourage people to provide input related to:
o Areas in the City people like to visit
o Areas that may need improvements for people walking and/or bicycling o What walking and bicycling topics are important
The project materials were
organized around tables and
canopies near the snack
bar/restrooms with the intent of
capturing people as they entered
or exited the baseball field area
or visited the park amenities.

Materials consisted of four large,
printed plots (2’ X 3’) on easels,
as well as project fact sheets,
comment cards, sign-up sheets,
pens, stick notes, and giveaway
swag for participants.

Event set up
Item Number: 2.

Event materials are provided as Attachment 1.

Engagement
Staff engaged event attendees in their vicinity,
introducing the project and inviting discussion and
participation with the materials. Additionally, during the Opening Ceremonies, the announcer promoted the ATP
project and presence at the event. Staff directly
interacted with an estimated 96 people, including adults (74), teenagers (9), and children (13), collecting 30
comments.

Participants were invited to view the materials and
provide comments on the boards, add stickers to
relevant topics, provide written input on comment cards or verbally share their thoughts with staff. Most
participants engaged in discussions with staff taking
notes. Seventy fact sheets were distributed, which
included the project website where people can take a
survey with questions similar to the pop-up materials.

Input Received
Comments received from participants were summarized
and organized around thematic topics.

Sidewalks
• The numbered streets do not have sidewalks;
sidewalks are needed throughout the city.
• More sidewalks are needed by Painted Hills
Middle School. There is nothing but desert on one
side.
• Recommendation for sidewalks in areas that do
not have them. These areas are all dirt and the
sand gets everywhere, including shoes.
• Need more sidewalks around schools.
• Attendee expressed the need for better street and sidewalk conditions overall. • Kids walk in the street on Mission Lakes Blvd when there isn’t a sidewalk. (Top) Participants discuss the
project with City staff. (Bottom)
Stickers were used to identify
topics people felt were important.

Item Number: 2.

• Attendee reported that there’s good sidewalks by Tedesco Park. Where there aren’t sidewalks it is dangerous for walking.
• Attendee commented that there are schools that do not have sidewalks nearby. • Attendee reported that when there aren’t any sidewalks people scooter in the middle of sidewalk.

Crosswalks and Crossings
• Crosswalks are needed mid-block on Palm Drive near the old K-Mart and grocery stores because it is unreasonable to expect pedestrians to cross at the designated intersections with crosswalks.
• Need for crossing guards at schools, particularly at Bubbling Wells (elementary school).
• More crossing signals to be able to cross streets.
• Recommendation for flashing RRFB near school especially at night and more visible crosswalks.
• At Hacienda and Ocotillo there is a crossing but not a stop sign.

Lighting
• Need for a light a 20th “where all the accidents are.” • More streetlights at Pierson at Highway 62.
• Increase lighting near schools.
• There is poor lighting overall. There is a stop sign in front of Casillas funeral home that is hard to see.

Bike Facilities & Bicycling
• Need for safer cycling on Pierson Boulevard.
• Need for more bike lanes along 1st Street.
• Bicyclists use Dillon Road and it is beautiful to ride, but it’s not safe because there aren’t facilities for walking or bicycling; attendee wants facilities and indicated “there’s room for it.”
• Bicycle riders ride against traffic on Palm Drive; “that’s why they get hit” on that road.
• Riding bikes on Dillon Road is still scary.

General Safety Concern
• Palm Drive is difficult to walk, bicycle, and drive.
• Palm Drive needs to be safer for bicycling.

Item Number: 2.

• Problematic driver behavior at the intersection of Hacienda Avenue and Ocotillo Road; drivers stop because there is a pedestrian crosswalk there even though there isn’t a stop sign there.
• The presence of loose dogs makes walking feel unsafe. • Attendee stated that street racing in residential neighborhoods is a problem. In Coachella and Indio they have put street bumps to discourage racing. • Attendee expressed that there should be a four-way stop at Cactus and Hacienda because there’s been multiple accidents there.
• Mission Lake Blvd and Sonora should be a four-way, stoplight or 3-way stop, especially when school lets out.
• Desert View and Ocotillo should have a stop sign or signal.

Other
• Interest in a large park for walking – similar to Orange County (possibly Great Park) • Attendee expressed the need to slow down traffic on residential streets. • Attendee wants to increase safety, crosswalks, and lighting, similar to improvements in Palm Springs.
• Little Morongo should extend down to 20th Street.
• Observation that Sky Valley (a nearby community, east of Desert Hot Springs and also north of Interstate 10) has good walking facilities. • Attendee stated that they don’t walk or bicycle in Desert Hot Springs, but that they would “if there was more stuff to walk to.”
• Attendee expressed the need for a bus route along Indian Canyon because otherwise “you have to walk all the way to Palm Drive.” • Concern about converting vehicle lanes to bike lanes due to the amount of vehicles in Desert Hot Springs; lamented that this has already occurred in the city. • Attendee found bike lanes annoying as a driver.
• Lots of homeless people.
• Support for speedbumps in residential areas.
• Attendee inquired about an update on a sports complex that is slated to be built in Desert Hot Springs.
• Attendee stated that it would be nice to be able to walk to Museum (Cabot’s Pueblo Museum) on Desert View Avenue.

Additional Notes
• Coachella-Valley wide art installation will include artworks in Desert Hot Springs.

Item Number: 2.

• Little League and City Staff organizers mentioned that there will be a closing ceremonies event this summer that will take place in the evening and be followed by an outdoor movie night. This was flagged as a possible engagement opportunity. • Memorial Day and the 4th of July identified as possible engagement opportunities.

Additional Photos
Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Attachment 1 – Outreach Phase I Event Materials
Item Number: 2.

For more information, visit:
www.CityOfDHS.org/DHSATP
The City of Desert Hot Springs is updating its
Active Transportation Plan to help improve
pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity!
or email us at:

[email protected]
STAKEHOLDER + COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The plan will build on previous efforts and
incorporate your input to better understand our input
existing issues and identify future improvements. uture improvements INITIAL PROJECT GOALS....

The Plan will guide future mobility investments, and propose uide future mobility investments approaches for safer and more comfortable and connected networks afer and more comfortable and connected networks that go where you want to bike, walk, skate ike, walk, skate, or scoot!

EXISTING CONDITIONS
REPORT

RECOMMENDATION

DEVELOPMENT

FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS &

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

PLAN DEVELOPMENT
& ADOPTION
EVALUATE Mobility conditions
ENGAGE Community
members
IDENTIFY Key issues, opportunities,
and recommendations
DEVELOP Goals, policies,
and programs
PRIORITIZE Bike & pedestrian
improvements
2024 2025 2026
Winter Spring Summer Fall / Winter
www.CityOf
DHS.org/DHSATP
Get Involved!
SHARE
your ideas
LEARN
about the plan &
upcoming events

PLAN TIMELINE & PROCESS
Item Number: 2.

Walking or biking for
fun/exercise
Going to/from transit
Safety while walking
or biking
Traveling to/from
school
Traveling to
neighboring cities
Amenities at
my destination
(benches, lighting,
bike parking)
User Education
(Safe Behaviors,
E-bikes)

USE A STICKER TO INDICATE THIS IS A PRIORITY FOR

WALKING OR BIKING

ADD A STICKY

NOTE TO SHARE
ADDITIONAL DETAILS!
Which sample topics are important to you?
WE’D LIKE TO LEARN ABOUT
YOUR PRIORITIES!
City of Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
www.CityOfDHS.org/DHSATP
What are the greatest walking and
bicycling needs in Desert Hot Springs?
Add your thoughts on a sticky note here
Item Number: 2.

Bicycle
FacilitiesCLASS II Bike LaneCLASS III Bike RouteCLASS I Multi-use Path Pedestrian FacilitiesSIDEWALKSCROSSWALKS & INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CV Link (Under Construction)
Dillon Rd
10 62
111
Palm Springs
Cathedral
City
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Unincorporated
Riverside County

DESERT HOT SPRINGS
Indian Canyon Dr
Pierson Bl
Palm Dr
Haceinda Av
Mountain View Rd
Long Canyon Rd
Mission Lakes Bl
20th Av
Varner Rd
Karen Av Worsley Rd
15th Av
Little Morongo Rd
West Dr
Two Bunch Palms Trail

SANTA ROSA SAN JACINTO

MOUNTAINS NATIONAL

MONUMENT

JOSHUA TREE

NATIONAL PARK

MISSION SPRINGS PARK

CORSINI
COYOTE
PARK
Peoples
Park
ArtsDistrict
0 1 Mile

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON
WALKING AND BICYCLING IN DESERT HOT SPRINGS!
City of Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan www.CityOfDHS.org/DHSATP Train Station & RailHiking TrailClass I (Planned)Class IIIClass IIParkSchoolStudy Area CV Link, Cathedral CityPalm DriveFirst Street
West DrivePalm Drive
Use stickers to show where safety or comfort improvements are needed = WALKING IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED HERE
= BIKING IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED HERE
Item Number: 2.

Other?
Work
Errands
School
Fun / Exercise
What types of trips would you like to walk or bike for? USE A STICKER TO INDICATE WALKING OR BIKING CV Link (Under Construction)
Dillon Rd
10 62
111
Palm Springs
Cathedral
City
Unincorporated
Riverside County
Unincorporated
Riverside County

DESERT HOT SPRINGS
Indian Canyon Dr
Pierson Bl
Palm Dr
Haceinda Av
Mountain View Rd
Long Canyon Rd
Mission Lakes Bl
20th Av
Varner Rd
Karen Av Worsley Rd
15th Av
Little Morongo Rd
West Dr
Two Bunch Palms Trail

SANTA ROSA SAN JACINTO

MOUNTAINS NATIONAL

MONUMENT

JOSHUA TREE

NATIONAL PARK

MISSION SPRINGS PARK

CORSINI
COYOTE
PARK
Peoples
Park
ArtsDistrict
0 1 Mile

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON
WALKING AND BICYCLING IN DESERT HOT SPRINGS!
City of Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan www.CityOfDHS.org/DHSATP Use stickers to show where you like (or want) to go
= I CURRENTLY WALK OR BIKE HERE= I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO WALK OR BIKE HERE Train Station & RailHiking TrailClass I (Planned)Class IIIClass IIParkSchoolStudy Area Item Number: 2.

COMMENT CARD
Please share any comments with us. Thank you for your time and input! ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________

COMMENT CARD
Please share any comments with us. Thank you for your time and input! ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Item Number: 2.

Event: _____________________________________ Date: _______________ Name E-mail
Sign In Here to Receive Project Updates:

Item Number: 2.

Outreach Phase II
Item Number: 2.

CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Pop-Up Engagement and Survey Series #2 Summary
Event 1: American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) at
Desert Hot Springs Soccer Park
14510 Palm Dr, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
Date: Saturday, October 4, 2025, from 8:00am –
12:00pm
Event 2: Desert Nights on the BLVD
66120 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
Date: Saturday, October 25, 2025, from 5:30pm – 9:30pm
Staff: Judith Duenas (DHS), Lynne Paul (DHS), Keith Paul (DHS), Xochitl Sosa (CRA), Lars Christiansen (CRA), Zeltzin Angon (CRA)
Engagement Overview
Two in-person pop-up events were conducted in support of the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan (ATP). The events sought to leverage the draw of the AYSO games and the Desert Night at the BLVD Concert Series. An additional online survey was made available from October 3, 2025, through November 7, 2025. The survey mirrored the popup events enabling participants to identify supporting program categories and potential prioritization inputs. The survey was advertised on social media and made available on the project website.

The in-person pop-up events served to:
• Inform community members about the ATP, including the project overview, schedule, project website, and how to stay involved. With the project further along than the previous outreach event in March, the boards displayed at the event included information on the draft pedestrian and bicycle networks, along with voting on the potential programs and prioritizations.
• Encourage people to provide input related to:
o Draft pedestrian network
o Draft bicycle network
o Types of projects the city should prioritize
o Types of programs the city should pursue
Item Number: 2.

Materials consisted of four large, printed plots (2’ X
3’) on easels, as well as project fact sheets,
comment cards, sign-up sheets, pens, and sticky
notes. In addition to the ATP materials.

Event materials are provided as Attachment 1.

Engagement
Staff engaged event attendees in their vicinity,
introducing the project and inviting discussion and
participation with the materials. Staff directly interacted with an estimated 74 people at Event 1 (AYSO), including people who did not interact with the boards but received a flyer.

Event 2 (Desert Night at the BLVD) had a higher engagement rate of 85 people, 46 who participated in the board activities and 39 who received a flyer. Six people completed the online survey.

Public Input
Participants were invited to provide comments on four different activities including:

1. Prioritization Activity

2. Supporting Programs Activity

3. Bike Network Activity

4. Pedestrian Network Activity
Each board at the in-person pop-ups instructed participants to add stickers to relevant topics, with the option to provide written input on comment cards or verbally share their thoughts with staff. The in-person activities were modified to a digital format for the survey, allowing participants to view and provide feedback on the same content and questions.

Prioritization Activity
The prioritization activity asked participants to identify which three inputs do they feel are most important when considering future pedestrian and bicycle projects. Twelve prioritization inputs were provided for their consideration, along with additional space to write in other topics.

Desert Hot Springs ATP pop-up event
set up
Item Number: 2.

Table 1 below is a compilation of the input collected at each engagement event. This table has listed the priority categories by highest to lowest votes received. Safety (54), Parks and Recreation (45), and Arts and Culture (31) were the three categories that received the most support from participants. This information will be used to develop the prioritization methodology for infrastructure projects.

Table 1 Prioritization Activities Tally
Priority Categories Event 1 Event 2 Survey Total
Safety 21 33 - 54
Parks and Recreation 20 23 2 45
Arts and Culture 11 20 - 31
Employment 5 21 - 26
Commercial and Services 5 16 1 22
Transit 5 13 4 22
Housing 8 9 3 20
Schools 12 2 2 16
Neighboring Communities 3 8 2 13
Comfort 4 7 1 12
Grant Competitiveness 5 3 - 8
Ease of Implementation 5 3 - 8
Item Number: 2.

Supporting Programs Activity
The supporting programs activity aimed to collect feedback on a range of potential programs that would supplement infrastructure enhancements. The sample programs were organized into four categories, including encouragement, education, enforcement, and safe routes programs which tend to overlap both education and encouragement.

Table 2 summarizes the input received from participants. The individual program type receiving the greatest support was Community Events (30), with votes largely recorded at the Desert Night at the BLVD event. The three sample Safe Routes programs, Safe Routes to School (29), Safe Routes to Transit (21), and Safe Routes for Seniors (15) all received relatively high support, indicating a potential need for a variety of programs that educate and encourage safe biking and walking behaviors, with a focus on specific demographic groups. Targeted enforcement of Posted Speed Limits (18) was also popular and consistent with concerns project facilitators heard from participants during the previous outreach phase.

Item Number: 2.

Table 2 – Program Votes
Priority Categories Program Votes Event 1 Event 2 Survey Total Safe Routes
Program
Schools and Students 11 13 5 29
Transit 6 13 2 21
Seniors 3 10 2 15
Encouragement and
Promotions
Community Events 7 21 2 30
Bike to Work Day/Month 5 2 - 7
Bicycle/Accessory Giveaways 1 6 1 8
Education Safe Riding Practices 3 9 - 12
E-bike Safety 4 5 - 9
Changeable Message Signs 0 7 1 8
Enforcement Posted Speed Limits 8 9 1 18
Improper Crossing Enforcement 4 9 1 14
Kids Wearing Helmets 7 3 - 10
Bike Network Activity
The activity board featured a map of the proposed bicycle network, with descriptions and graphic illustrations of the different bicycle facility classifications to enhance public understanding. Participants were invited to mark high-priority areas, such as locations with difficult riding conditions or where bike lane compliance is a concern, and to indicate where additional bicycle facilities are needed. The resulting priority corridors and intersections are listed in Table 3.

Item Number: 2.

Table 3 – Bicycle Network Feedback
High Priority Facility
Intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Mission Lakes Boulevard Intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Pierson Boulevard Intersection of Mission Lakes Boulevard and Little Morongo Road (2) Along Little Morongo Road between 15th Avenue and Dillon Road Along Little Morongo Road between Two Bunch Palms Trail and 15th Avenue Along Little Morongo Road, midblock between Pierson Blvd and Two Bunch Palms Trail Intersection of Desert View Drive and Cholla Drive
Intersection of Desert View Drive and Cactus Drive
Intersection of Cactus Drive and Ironwood Drive
Intersection of Two Bunch Palms Trail and Palm Drive
Along Cholla Drive between Ironwood Road and Two Bunch Palms Trail Along Long Canyon Road near DHS Rotary Dog Park
Along Palm Drive between Dillon Road and 18th Avenue
Along Mission Lakes Boulevard between Indian Canyon Drive and Little Morongo Road (2)
Intersection of Mission Lakes Boulevard and Sonora Drive Intersection of West Drive and 8th Street
Intersection of 8th Street and Sunset Avenue
Intersection of Pierson Boulevard and Little Morongo Road Along Little Morongo Road between Pierson Boulevard and Two Bunch Palms Trail (2) Intersection of Little Morongo Road and Two Bunch Palms Trails Intersection of Hacienda Avenue and Long Canyon Road
Intersection of Varner Road and Palm Drive
Include a Facility
Intersection of Mission Lakes Boulevard and Palm Drive
Intersection of Mountain View Road and Dillon Road
Intersection of Camino Aventura and Avenida Monteflora
Intersection of Varner Road and Avenida Manzana
Along Mission Lakes Boulevard between Indian Canyon Drive and Clubhouse Boulevard Along Indian Canyon Drive between Mission Lakes Boulevard and Pierson Boulevard Intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Pierson Boulevard Along Indian Canyon Drive between Pierson Boulevard and 14th Avenue Along Indian Canyon Drive between 14th Avenue and Dillion Road Along Little Morongo Road between Mission Lakes Boulevard and Pierson Boulevard (3) Along Little Morongo Road between Two Bunch Palms Trail and 15th Avenue Along Little Morongo Road between 15th Avenue and Dillion Road Along Palm Drive between Hacienda Avenue and Ironwood Drive Item Number: 2.

Pedestrian Network Activity
Pedestrian recommendations were presented in the form of a Pedestrian Route Type network, which categorizes roadways by the types of fronting land uses and destinations served. The different route types then inform the type of segment and intersection enhancements that should be considered. Participants were invited to identify high-priority locations by placing dots in areas where pedestrian improvements are most needed, with a summary of the locations identified in Table 4.

Table 4 – Pedestrian Network Feedback
High Priority Facility
Intersection of Mission Lakes Boulevard and Little Morongo Road Intersection of Cholla Drive and Pierson Boulevard
Intersection of West Drive and 2nd Street
Along First Street between Pierson Boulevard and Ocotillo Road Along 4th Street between Pierson Boulevard and Ocotillo Road Intersection of Ironwood Drive and 2nd Street
Intersection of Cuando Way and Cielo Azul Way
Intersection of Two Bunch Palms Train and Verbena Drive Intersection of Ironwood Drive and West Drive
Residential area near Two Bunch Palms Trail and Julian Drive Intersection of Dillon Road and Palm Drive (2)
On Pierson Boulevard west of Worsley Road
On Indian Canyon Drive near the north edge boundary of the city Item Number: 2.

Intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Mission Lakes Boulevard On Pierson Boulevard and near Desert Terrace Way
Intersection of Palm Drive and Pierson Boulevard
Along Little Morongo Road and San Gorgonio Lane
Intersection of Dillon Road and Carol Drive
Intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and 18th Avenue
Indian Canyon Drive and Garnet Avenue
On Varner Road between West Drive and Palm Drive
Include a Facility
Intersection of 5th Street and Cactus Drive
Intersection of Hacienda Avenue and Cactus Drive
Intersection of Ironwood Drive and Cactus Drive
Intersection of Ironwood Drive and El Cajon Drive
Near Two Bunch Palms Trail and Verbena Dr
Dirt path connecting Bubbling Wells and Miracle Hill Road On SR-62 west of Worsley Road (3)
On Little Morongo Road and Annandale Avenue (2)
Along Little Morongo Road between Mission Lakes Boulevard and Pierson Boulevard
Intersection of Little Morongo Road and 15th Avenue
Along 15th Avenue between Cabot Road and West Drive (2) Intersection of Palm Drive and Clair Avenue
Intersection of Palm Drive and 20th Avenue
Intersection of Palm Drive and Hacienda Avenue
Along Pierson Boulevard between Miracle Hill Road and Tamar Drive (2) North of Yucca Drive near Desert Hot Springs Loop Entrance (2) Northeast of Pierson Boulevard north of Cabot’s Pueblo Museum (2) Slightly northeast of intersection of Long Canyon Road and Hacienda Avenue (2)
East of Mission Lakes Boulevard near the city boundary (2) Item Number: 2.

Verbal and Written Input Received
Additional comments received from participants during discussions and written on boards were summarized and organized around thematic topics. Comments from the survey are marked with (*).

Bike Facilities & Bicycling
Community feedback on bike facilities and bicycling reflects mixed opinions, with many residents noting that current bike lanes are underused due to safety concerns, heavy traffic, and the desert climate. Participants expressed greater interest in developing bike routes and shared-use paths in lower speed, lower-traffic areas that connect neighborhoods, parks, and key destinations.
• Attendee mentioned not seeing a lot of people use the existing bike lanes. The weather and climate conditions like the heat and wind do not encourage cycling.

There is no need for bike lanes on Palm Drive as it is one of the main entry and exit ways of the city, we should prioritize Palm Drive to have a better traffic flow, not congest them more.
• Bike lanes look nice, but they are not used by many people. If streets are not safe, why add a bike lane? We should make the streets safe first and then add bike lanes. • We need bike facilities in areas where there is less traffic and high speeds or that connect smaller areas like parks instead of main streets. • People do not use bike lanes on Palm Drive, bike lanes should be on flatter roads like Two Bunch Palms where it is easier to bike on.
• A bike facility on Little Morongo Road may not make sense because it is a commuting road that connects with larger roads. There is a lot of traffic and not ideal for cycling.
• Bike routes should be constructed at the same time as sidewalks. • The bike lanes on Palm Drive north of Pierson are causing traffic congestion. • People don’t ride bicycles in the city due to the hot desert climate and wind. • Attendee would like to see a bicycle facility south of Palm Drive and Dillon, and along Varner Road. Also wants a walking trail/path along Verbena Drive from Camino Campanero to Two Bunch Palms Drive.
• Attendee does not support having bike facilities on Indian Canyon Road. It won’t be used for bicycling and will be a waste of money. While they support bikes, they would like to see them closer to town.
• There is interest in more walking destinations and connected trails for pedestrians and cyclists.

Item Number: 2.

• *Routes for bikes are fine. Some streets unfortunately don’t have bike lanes or enough room to add a bike lane; if that can be fixed that would be awesome! • *Arrollo Street should be part of a bike route.

Pedestrian Infrastructure
Community members consistently emphasized the widespread lack of sidewalks and safe pedestrian infrastructure throughout the city. Feedback highlighted the need for new and improved sidewalks, safer crossings, smoother pavement, and better maintenance to support walkability and accessibility in residential and high-traffic areas. • Multiple attendees mentioned the lack of sidewalks.
• There was a sidewalk improvement that was paved over and kept the same shape not improved.
• Need for walking facilities along Cactus Drive.
• Need for more sidewalks.
• Add sidewalks along Pierson Boulevard (did not specify where). • There are no sidewalks along Little Morongo Drive, making it unsafe to walk and bike. Pedestrians are often utilizing the driving lane to walk along this street. • More sidewalks on 4th, Vista Place, and Upland Way — people are seen using the driving lane to walk or bike.
• There are no sidewalks on Via Vista.
• Needs for sidewalk at Palm View Estates.
• Midblock crossings are frequent since crosswalks are far apart. • All Class III bike routes need improvements.
• There needs to be infrastructure that encourages safety on the corner of Desert View.
• There is a lack of sidewalks throughout the city; more sidewalks are needed for safe walking.
• Missing sidewalks were noted as a key accessibility concern, especially in residential areas and near downtown.
• More crosswalks are needed — residents report that crossings are spaced too far apart, often a mile or more.
• Requests for more space between sidewalks and driving lanes, similar to the CV Link design, to improve comfort and safety.
• Smoother pavement and continuous sidewalks are needed throughout the city. • Residents also cited “horrible infrastructure,” including rocks and industrial debris in public areas.

Item Number: 2.

• During the rainy season, water and debris accumulate on streets and are not cleaned up promptly.
• Need for a controlled intersection at the corner of Cactus and Hacienda as the eastwest cross traffic does not stop. There are stops on the north and south approaching legs but it is scary to cross both as a pedestrian and as a driver. • *This area is weirdly ignored, no streetlights, sidewalks up and down Mesquite. Lots of walkers including a bus stop for children with unsafe conditions. No area for them to truly be off the road safely and on a sidewalk. This is a priority. • *This street (Cuando) is very narrow and hard to see ahead due to parked cars plus the curve. Needs to have sidewalks and/or widen it.
• *Basic sidewalks and lighting throughout the city... The "district" is the only practical place in the city with sidewalks, which is crude. Focus on adding sidewalks in the neighborhoods first so that pedestrians are able to get out of the street.

Lighting
Residents expressed strong concerns about insufficient lighting throughout the city, particularly in residential areas, parks, and near schools. Comments emphasized the need for improved street and pedestrian lighting to enhance visibility and safety for drivers and walkers, especially at night.
• Need lighting on Liberty as making turns is sometimes dangerous (did not mention cross street).
• The school near San Pablo Park gets really dark at night all the way to 12th street. It doesn’t feel safe to walk and there are a number of students that walk near there.

Similar for Wardman Park.
• Need for lights that turn on at night at parking lots . • General comments about lighting needed throughout the city, specifically pedestrian lighting.
• Residential areas are walkable but there is no lighting. • There needs to be more lighting to see dogs, coyotes, and homeless individuals • Palm and 8th need better lighting.
• People would like to see more lighting throughout neighborhoods for safety. • Some streets, including north of Hacienda Avenue, are reported to be very dark. • *Mesquite Street lacks essential pedestrian infrastructure, including streetlights and continuous sidewalks.
*Insufficient lighting and pedestrian safety issues were reported along Main Street, where pedestrians often walk directly in the roadway. Improved street lighting and Item Number: 2.

designated pedestrian facilities are needed to enhance nighttime visibility and reduce conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians.

Traffic Safety & Speeding
Residents voiced serious concerns about traffic safety, particularly around schools where speeding and disregard for road rules put children at risk. Residents also highlighted unsafe driving behaviors, ineffective speed enforcement, and unsafe transit conditions, calling for stronger safety measures, better enforcement, and improved access to key destinations such as the library. Community members called for stronger enforcement, speed control measures such as speed bumps, and safer areas for students traveling to and from school. • People do not respect the road rules, “I have seen cars go around school buses that have the stop as they are dropping students.”
• Multiple attendees mentioned that they would like to see increased safety overall. • Attendee mentioned an accident where a girl was run over while getting off the bus by a speeding car, we need a separate area for kids going to and from school. • People are speeding too much, and the city should install speed bumps.

Specifically on 6th Street between Cactus Drive and Palm Drive since there are kids who walk around this area. The city had said they installed speed cameras, but they do not have an effect as people are still speeding.
• * Cuando Way experiences limited visibility and safety concerns due to its narrow width, curved alignment, and the presence of parked vehicles. • Hit and run seen on Desert View Avenue.
• Many cars are often running stop signs at Cholla Drive and Hacienda Avenue. • Cars are often speeding through yellow lights
• Most traffic seen between 2pm – 6pm headed northbound. • People are speeding too much and the city should install speed bumps, especially on 6th between Cactus and Palm Drive, since children walk in the area. • The city reported installing speed cameras, but residents note they have not been effective — people are still speeding.
• People speed near schools, and during drop-off and pick-up times cars block travel lanes while trying to cut in line.
• Many residents reported general speeding concerns throughout the city. • Additional speed bumps are requested on First Street and Cactus Drive. • There is interest in more safety measures for children and elders who walk in these areas.
• Cars often park poorly, creating unsafe conditions for pedestrians. • Calls for smoother pavement and safer road conditions were noted.

Item Number: 2.

• Transit safety concerns: intoxicated individuals on buses make other riders feel unsafe, particularly around children and elderly passengers. • Residents requested stricter rules for bus behavior, including addressing smells and restricting dogs to service animals only.
• Some bus stops are occupied by homeless individuals drinking alcohol. • Residents suggested the use of small community shuttles or golf carts on bike routes to save gas and time.
• There is interest in safer access to community destinations such as the library. • A “Safe Routes to Library” initiative was suggested to improve visibility and accessibility to the library.
• *A corridor improvement is needed, as many students from the local high school cross the intersection without a protected crosswalk.
• *Pedestrian behavior and visibility issues along Main Street present safety concerns, particularly at night. Additional street lighting is needed throughout the corridor. The intersection at Hacienda and Cactus may also benefit from the installation of a stoplight or stop sign.
• *Cuando Way presents visibility and safety challenges due to its narrow width, parked vehicles, and curved alignment.

Transit
Residents expressed concerns about public transit safety and reliability, noting uncomfortable conditions on buses and long wait times. Suggestions included implementing clearer bus conduct rules, improving service frequency, and offering shuttle options for community events to make transportation more convenient and accessible. • Attendee mentioned being concerned about safety while riding the bus. People under the influence on the bus make riding feel unsafe. There are concerns about them being aggressive in proximity to kids and elderly riders. The bus needs more rules to address safety and smell. Dogs allowed on the bus should also be service dogs and not dogs that misbehave.
• Public transportation is not convenient.
• Waiting for the bus can sometimes take more than an hour. • Transit options (shuttles) are needed for events like this (Desert Nights on the BLVD).

Parks
Residents emphasized the need for more and larger parks to reduce overcrowding and provide safe, engaging spaces for children and families. Feedback also highlighted the importance of park maintenance, new recreational amenities such as splash pads, Item Number: 2.

pickleball courts, and shared-use paths, as well as expanded youth programs and creative public spaces that foster community activity.
• Multiple attendees expressed the need for more or bigger parks overall as the ones that exist get too crowded.
• A bigger field because the parks get too crowded
• It would be great if the football team had their own park as the soccer park currently gets too crowded since the teams practice on the field. • Parks would help keep kids safe and off the streets.
• Would like to see more parks and activities, for example a splash pad for kids and a water fountain.
• Parks need to be cleaned up; there is also concern about homeless encampments at parks.
• Unkept parks cause mud and dirty runoff because of the sprinklers. • Upgrade parks for sports and entertainment.
• Would like to see pickleball courts.
• Interested in seeing more trains and entertainment parks (soccer, etc.). • Interested in more programs for kids such as a recreation center or Boys and Girls Club.
• Residents appreciate existing murals and public art.
• Requests for shared-use paths where people can safely walk and bike. • Residents would like parks and open spaces to be better maintained and more accessible.

Community Programs
Residents expressed strong interest in more community events, programs, and gathering spaces that bring people together and enhance local pride. Feedback highlighted the need for expanded youth and senior activities, better access to resources, sustained program funding, and more frequent citywide events to foster connection, safety, and economic vitality.
• There were suggestions to hold more community events in currently empty lots, as this event was well received.
• Residents would like more places and programs for children and youth (e.g., entertainment spaces, long-term attractions, or recreation centers). • Requests for assistance and resources for people with special needs and better access to local information.

Item Number: 2.

• Interest in more job opportunities; some residents noted that “biking to work” isn’t feasible since most people commute out of the area.
• Calls for increased funding for community programs — many initiatives close without sustained financial support.
• Advocates requested updates on previously discussed programs, such as a domestic violence support group last mentioned in 2018. • Suggestions included starting a bingo program at the senior center. • Emphasis on creating community safety programs that engage both kids and elders. • Residents expressed appreciation for community events like this one and suggested expanding them to other areas.
• There is optimism about downtown being “up and coming,” paired with a desire to see improvements citywide.
• Participants emphasized that creating “somewhere nice to walk to” would improve community pride and pedestrian activity.
• Need for more community events like the ones that occur in Palm Springs like the Thursday night fairs. It could be an incentive for other people and businesses to come to Desert Hot Springs.

Housing
Residents emphasized housing as a key community priority, highlighting the need for more options to support people experiencing homelessness. Some also noted challenges in obtaining residential building permits, suggesting that simplifying this process could help address local housing needs.
• Regarding Housing as an option for the board, an attendee mentioned needing housing for people who are homeless.
• Regarding the prioritization board where Housing was an option, two people mentioned the lack of ease in obtaining building permits for residential homes. • Concern about homelessness in Desert Hot Springs.
• Emergency housing option similar to the one in Banning for example 3 month housing for people who are homeless.

Additional Notes
Residents shared a wide range of feedback focused on city transparency, maintenance, and safety. Comments called for clearer project updates, cleaner neighborhoods, and better property upkeep, while also emphasizing the need for downtown revitalization, support for vulnerable populations, and more equitable distribution of city improvements and amenities.

Item Number: 2.

• Attendee mentioned the need to see more transparency with the city projects, more updates and gave the example of a park project with a donor attached that was announced but did not receive updates beyond that.
• Along Ocotillo Road after it rains there is often a lot of debris and trash left. • There are some houses that have cars parked on the sidewalk or where the fences extend into the sidewalk and block the path of travel.
• Regarding the prioritization board, programs that prioritize seniors. • We have enough schools.
• Attendee mentioned there are 5 schools that they know of participating in the October 8 walk to bike/school day and supports SRTS projects. • Multiple attendees mentioned liking the Hacienda project. • Questions about the Hacienda project cost and why other places are not receiving the same type of facilities.
• Would like to see more shade.
• Expanding the AYSO fields like in Indio or Coachella. • People prefer not to walk because they do not feel safe • There are concerns about crime and homelessness
• Residents noted many houses with junk-filled yards, some spilling into public rightof-way and blocking sidewalks or driveways. • Old or broken vehicles block access and paths.
• Participants suggested adopting ordinances like those in La Quinta or Palm Springs that require properties to be kept clear of junk
• Long Canyon Road and Hacienda Avenue have open space potential, but residents note the lack of parking or formal access points.
• There is significant litter and trash accumulation on city streets. • Concerns about homelessness and transient individuals downtown, some drinking in public areas.
• Residents feel unsafe due to visible homelessness and substance abuse in public spaces.
• Requests for more housing options and support services for homeless individuals. • Suggestions for substance abuse support groups and more drug control measures. • Interest in faith-based or religious partnerships to support community safety and social programs.
• Some residents mentioned the need for an “on-call minister” to assist during traffic accidents or crises.
• Downtown lacks active businesses and many are boarded up.

Item Number: 2.

• There is a general lack of destinations and attractions, leading to low pedestrian activity.
• Residents would like to see downtown revitalized, with a focus on cleaning up edge areas of the city.
• Runoff and drainage issues affect downtown and outlying areas. • The area is described as having potential but in need of consistent maintenance. • *The area around The Hub is considered visually unappealing and contributes negatively to the overall impression of the corridor. Community members expressed concern about the vacant car wash and the presence of homeless individuals near the Stater’s parking lot, noting that these conditions create an unattractive and neglected appearance at a key intersection.

Item Number: 2.

AYSO Photos
Item Number: 2.

AYSO Board Results
Pedestrian Route Type Network input locations Bicycle Network input locations Program Types Board Priorities Board
Item Number: 2.

Desert Nights on the BLVD Photos
Desert Nights on the BLVD Board Results
Bicycle Route Type Network input locations Pedestrian Network input locations Item Number: 2.

Program Types Board Priorities Board
Item Number: 2.

Attachment 1 – Outreach Phase II Event Materials
Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Open House Workshop
Item Number: 2.

CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Workshop Summary
Event: Open House Workshop
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2026, from 5:00pm –
7:00pm
Location: Desert Hot Springs City Hall Council
Chambers
Staff: Judith Duenas (DHS), Lynne Paul (DHS), Andrew Prescott (CRA), Lars Christiansen (CRA), Xochitl Sosa (CRA), Zeltzin Angon (CRA)
Event Overview
The open house workshop served to present key findings
from the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) development and invite feedback from participants. The workshop was
organized in an open house format to allow participants to come and go during the 2-hour event and to provide
flexibility for participants to focus on the topics they wanted to discuss in depth. Project and city staff engaged with 8 participants.

The event took place in the Desert Hot Springs City Hall Council Chambers, which was organized into five different stations:
1) Welcome and Project Overview
2) DHS Today: Existing Conditions
3) What We’ve Heard: Community Engagement
Findings
4) DHS Tomorrow: Recommendations
5) Prioritization and Next Steps.

Twelve boards were used to present information at the stations, along with a looping PowerPoint presentation displaying existing conditions findings at station #2.

Additional materials included sign-up sheets, comment cards, activity sheets, stick notes, and refreshments. The activity sheet provided questions to solicit feedback at each station.

Event materials are provided as Attachment 1.

Event set up
Item Number: 2.

Input Received
Comments received from participants were summarized and organized around the four sections and their respective boards. Overall, there was support for physical infrastructure improvements, including sidewalk infill and lighting, general safety improvements.

DHS Today: Existing Conditions
While there weren’t specific comments on the existing conditions, there was general agreement on the lack of lighting, sidewalks, and vehicles driving at high speeds.

DHS Tomorrow: Recommendations
Proposed Pedestrian Network
- Street connecting soccer park and Two Bunch Palms
needs to be more accessible to pedestrians.
- Two Bunch Palms and Palm Drive would be a good
candidate for the district type of facility. I see lots of pedestrians there.

Intersection and Access Improvements
- Daylighting is a good idea as people often cross midblock even if there isn’t a crosswalk. - Support implementing bike signals and bike signal
heads.
- Would like to see signals that are more visually
attention grabbing like flashing lights. It feels like
signals have to compete with phones (if people are
using phones and driving) so the more attention
grabbing they are the more helpful they will be.

Supporting Programs
- Implementing learning programs at schools and for
adults would be helpful. By teaching adults, we can
also encourage children to adopt safe practices.
- Enforcement program to remind biking and driving rules as there are some drivers that don’t respect bikers on
the road.
- Need E-bike safety education for kids.

Next Steps: Prioritization
While discussing the project prioritization, participants made the following suggestions:

Participants discussing the different project
phases with project staff
Item Number: 2.

- Need safe eastbound turning pocket at Palm and Park because making an unprotected left turn, as it is now, is unsafe.
- Add a right turn pocket on 20th and Palm Drive to avoid stopping traffic at Palm Drive. - Widen Cholla Drive between Iron Ironwood and Two Bunch Palm. The road is too narrow for two vehicles to pass safely which creates safety concern for drivers and emergency access.
- I strongly encourage the addition of sidewalks to improve pedestrian safety as residents and visitors currently have to walk on the road or dirt.

Participant Sign-in sheet
Name Email
Jan Pye NA
Avraham Farza [email protected]
Juan R. Hernandez [email protected]
Jesus Lopez [email protected]
Jose Dueñas NA
Michael Bretz [email protected]
Item Number: 2.

Attachment 1 – Open House Workshop Event Materials
Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Workshop Activity Sheet
Learn about the latest updates to the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan (DHS ATP) and how this plan will improve walking, biking, and getting around our community. At each station, please take a moment to complete the questions below and share your feedback. Your input will help shape the future of transportation in Desert Hot Springs! Station 2 | DHS Today: Existing Conditions

1. How does this information reflect your lived experience in Desert Hot Springs? (check one of the following)
☐ The information matches what I have experienced in Desert Hot Springs ☐ Something important is missing (please specify)
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Station 3 | What We’ve Heard: Community Engagement Findings

1. How does this information reflect your lived experience in Desert Hot Springs? (check one of the following)
☐ The information matches what I have experienced in Desert Hot Springs ☐ Something important is missing (please specify)
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

2. What are your preferred ways to get involved in a City project? (check all that apply) ☐ Community workshop (like this event)
☐ Pop-up workshop at other events (like Desert Nights on the BLVD) ☐ Online information (surveys, project website, social media) ☐ Other: ______________________________
Item Number: 2.

Station 4 | DHS Tomorrow: Recommendations

1. What are your thoughts on the recommended networks? (check one of the following) ☐ I support the network recommendations
☐ Something important is missing (please specify)
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

2. What are your thoughts on the program recommendations? (check one of the following) ☐ I support the program recommendations
☐ Something important is missing (please specify)
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

3. Please share any other comments on recommendations
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Station 5 | Next Steps

4. Is there a location or project that you feel should be a high priority? If so, please identify and describe why.
_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

5. Would you like to receive future communications on the DHS ATP? ☐ No
☐ Yes, here is my email address: _______________________________________________ Item Number: 2.

Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1
Item Number: 2.

MEETING NOTES
City of Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 | June 25, 2025
Attendees
Desert Hot Springs (DHS): Judith Duenas (Public Works), Travis Clark (Community Development), Stan Henry (Police), Lynne Paul (Public Works), Jesus Lopez (Public Works), Raul Arauz (Public Works)
Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD): Abdelhak Bouzroud Caltrans: Stephanie Amad (Contracts), Haissam Yahya (D8), Mourshad Haider (D8), Cuong Phu Trinh (D8)
Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG): Julie Mignogna Riverside County Transportation Department (RCTD): John Merrill NAI Consulting (NAI): Josh Nickerson, Erika Sinohuiz
CR Associates (CRA): Andrew Prescott, Cat Callaghan, Scott Cartwright The meeting notes summarize the input received during the discussion portion of the stakeholder working group meeting, which followed a brief presentation on the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation (DHS ATP) project. The presentation is provided as Attachment 1.

Issues, needs, priorities & risks

1. DHS Police
a. Fatal Collisions along Palm Drive frequently occur at midblock locations b. Physical barriers in the medians that would force people to cross at the intersections would help, similar to what was implemented in Cathedral City in late 2024
i. NAI managed the Cathedral City project and can share the plans c. Palm Drive from Two Bunch Palms north to Pierson is the priority area for pedestrian safety concerns
d. Nighttime in the summer tends to be an issue

2. Caltrans would like to be part of the CV Link connections planning as there are many streetlights that will need to be coordinated.

3. PSUSD
a. Would like school bus stops to be accounted for
i. Mostly for pedestrians, buses do not allow bikes onboard Item Number: 2.

ii. PSUSD can share bus stop locations with any supplementary information
b. Approved zones for transportation that are qualified for busing i. PSUSD can share zones
Opportunities and needs

1. The City is bound by SR-62 and I-10. Any facility recommendations would be coordinated with Caltrans

2. On the west side of SR-62 (about 1,100 acres), has an approved specific plan with approximately 2,200 housing units. This would necessitate additional connections

3. The Caltrans Active Transportation Plan for District 8 can be found here:
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/bb7051127b3a4ce39ec00151914eb66c a. There is a link to a layered map that shows previous comments submitted by the public and identified needs from the Consultant team Planned projects or programs

1. DHS
a. Hacienda Ave projects, West Drive to Tamar
i. Phase 1, which is under construction, has new sidewalks and new Class II buffered bike lane, pedestrian crossing improvements, and a landscaped median, similar to Palm Drive
ii. Phase 2 will follow. From Tamar to Long Canyon
b. South Palm Drive
i. Starts where the current improvements end at Dillon Road and to the I-10 interchange, under construction late fall/winter
c. DHS submitted for an affordable housing AHSC SB1 grant that reimagines downtown as pedestrian-oriented, event space – a downtown environment with street trees, lighting, Class II (Class IV past Little Morongo) i. The City won’t know if it was selected until December ii. DHS to share updated plans with CRA
d. Little Morongo Road
i. Connections between Dillon Road and 20th Avenue are in development where the new Amazon building will be and a third of the stretch is being developed by the Mission Springs Water District as part of frontage improvements.
ii. DHS is interested in a path on the east side of the street adjacent to the conservation land.

Item Number: 2.

e. North of Dillon Road
i. Any future projects will be required to include an active transportation path as a condition for entitlement, depending on the site conditions ii. There are high voltage transmission lines where there's a lot of space that [developers] are not able to use, which is perfect for a bicycle or pedestrian path
f. Indian Canyon Drive
i. There is already a bike path from 19th to 18th, looking to extend the path from 19th to 20th (using Rule 28, Edison undergrounding money) g. Mission Lakes Boulevard
i. Low hanging fruit is to use the substantial right of way between Little Morongo Road and Palm to develop Class IV facilities

2. RCTD
a. Active Transportation Plan for Desert Edge Community, to the west of the City limits
i. There are three schools in the project area
ii. Draft plan will be going to the Board of Supervisors in the next month iii. RCTD share the file after approval
iv. RCTD to look into any public engagement and availability of raw data. b. County is just getting started on the County-wide safety action plan i. RCTD can put CRA in contact with consultant

3. CVAG
a. DHS CV Link Feasibility Study: looking to cross the CV Link across the I-10 b. Community Connector Project
c. TPPS, as part of this, the ATP update being done by HDR i. CRA is the active transportation subconsultant

4. Caltrans has a project on SR-62 and Pierson to signalize the intersection a. Design status update after July 11
b. Construction mid-2027
c. Project # EA1N880
Action Items
• NAI to share Cathedral City median barrier project plans with CRA • PSUSD to share bus stop locations with any supplementary information, such as average ridership with CRA
• PSUSD to share approved zones for transportation that are qualified for busing • DHS to share updated AHSC grant application plans with CRA Item Number: 2.

• RCTD to share the Active Transportation Plan for Desert Edge Community with CRA after Board of Supervisors approval
• RCTD to investigate and share any public engagement and availability of raw data conducted as part of the Active Transportation Plan for Desert Edge Community development with CRA
• RCTD to put CRA in contact with consultant for the County-wide safety action plan
Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #2
Item Number: 2.

MEETING NOTES
City of Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan
Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #2 | November 13, 2025 Attendees
Desert Hot Springs (DHS): Judith Duenas (Public Works), Travis Clark (Community Development), Chief Shaw (Police), Jesus Lopez (Public Works) Caltrans: Stephanie Amad (Contracts), Haissam Yahya (D8) Riverside County Transportation Department (RCTD): John Merrill County of Riverside: Susan Vombaur
NAI Consulting (NAI): Josh Nickerson, Erika Sinohuiz
CR Associates (CRA): Andrew Prescott, Ana Garate
The meeting was organized around the following topics:
• Project Schedule & Updates
• Draft Recommendations
• Recent Community Outreach
• Group Discussion
• Next Steps
The meeting notes summarize the input received during the discussion portion of the stakeholder working group meeting, which followed a brief presentation summarizing recent project updates. The presentation is provided as Attachment 1. • The networks show connections along Pierson Boulevard toward SR-62; there is an approved Specific Plan just west of SR-62 – consider extending the facility (Haissam Yahya)
o There is a specific plan that addresses the intersection of Pierson Bl intersection with SR-62
o Currently a class IV facility wouldn’t be to cross SR-62 due to ROW constraints
• Caltrans is supportive of the City and the network ideas • Caltrans is participating in CVAG’s CV Link to Desert Hot Springs extension project • AHSC Grant update
o One section of a bike path wasn’t approved, and the City appealed/protested the decision to receive credit
Item Number: 2.

o Rural communities are prioritized
o AHSC requested to do a feasibility analysis with no commitment o City will hear by dec 10 if they are awarded or not
o Total request was $12M
• Improving Dillon Rd has received a lot of support from the Desert Edge Community (John Merrill)
o Main concerns are about safety and electrical vehicle usage Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

Item Number: 2.

C
Pedestrian Route Type
Framework
Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan Draft
Item Number: 2.

3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310  San Diego, CA 92103  619-795-6086 www.CRAmobility.com
Pedestrian Route Type Framework
This memorandum introduces the concept of pedestrian route types (providing a general definition, overview of the categories, how they are assigned, etc.) and suggests how they could be applied to Desert Hot Springs in long range transportation planning. Included in the latter sections of this memo are specific details of the route type categories, including characteristics associated with each typology and the associated treatments recommended. The memo concludes with the proposed pedestrian route type assignments throughout the City’s street network (Figure 1).

Overview of Pedestrian Route Types
Pedestrian route types are hierarchical designations assigned to all public streets citywide which classify the pedestrian environment. Each route type category conveys design guidance for the pedestrian environment specific to that category and prescribes suitable amenities. Route types are assigned with long range planning conditions in mind, with respect to the relative levels of anticipated pedestrian activity, reflecting existing uses and planned growth. As the designations represent forecasted conditions, it is understood some streets will not yet have attained the characteristics of their assigned route type.

There are five route type categories recommended for Desert Hot Springs:
• District
• Corridor
• Connector
• Neighborhood
• Ancillary
The assignment of pedestrian route type categories to streets is influenced by the city’s transportation system and planned land uses. Higher ranking designations, such as District, Corridor and Connector, are often reserved for streets which are identified in a community’s circulation element street classification network. Of those first three categories, District and Corridor route types are used to designate areas where the conditions or end goal is abundant, sustained pedestrian activity. Districts are the classification often used for commercial streets within city centers and other places with very walkable characteristics (mixed use areas, commercial areas which implement “park once” parking demand management, etc.).

Item Number: 2.

[Grab your reader’s attention with a great quote from the document or use this space to emphasize a key point. To place this text box anywhere on the page, just drag it.] Figure 1: Proposed Pedestrian Route Type Network
Item Number: 2.

Corridors are used to designate areas with regular pedestrian activity, albeit at a lower magnitude compared to Districts. Corridors will often be assigned in an environment where those characteristics are also present though primarily oriented along a linear corridor (this designation is not intended for freeway adjacent or other types of auto-oriented commercial nodes). These are often streets outside of a city center though lined with commercial, educational, recreational, and/or civic land uses.

A category for moderate to low pedestrian volume environments along streets with network significance (Connectors), a category for streets which function primarily for residential property access (Neighborhood), and a category for ancillary pedestrian facilities (shared use paths, paseos, etc.) comprise the remaining route types. The streets classified within DHS’s Mobility and Infrastructure Element Roadways Plan are assigned one of the District, Corridor or Connector route types, while non-designated local streets are assigned the Neighborhood route type.

Pedestrian Route Type Applications
Pedestrian route types can assist long-range transportation planning by providing practitioners with a framework to assess whether the City’s streets and walkways exist to a baseline standard or are deficient and lacking amenities relative to the caliber of their assigned classification. Any lacking infrastructure and amenities identified from this assessment can ultimately become recommended Active Transportation Plan pedestrian projects. For planned growth and redeveloping areas, pedestrian route type designations can be used to identify the amenities and standards which should be in place when future development occurs (or provided as property frontage improvements by the developer), anticipating the needs and providing the necessary design guidance as the area transitions to build out.

The City’s pedestrian route type network should be informed by and complement the General Plan roadway classifications and the City’s Complete Streets policy priority. Excluding local roadways, there are four classifications in the General Plan where it is policy that pedestrians should be given primary consideration:
• Secondary I – four lane divided roadways with 100’ of right-of-way • Secondary II – four lane undivided roadways with 80’-90’ of right-of-way • Collector – four lane undivided roadways with 72’-82’ of right-of-way • Local Collector – two lane undivided roadways with 60’-70’ of right-of-way In General Plan figure MI-8, there are cross-sections for each street classification, with typical right-of-way widths, curb-to-curb widths and the elements of the street within the curb-to-curb.

The typical cross-sections for each of these classifications include between 8’ and 12’ of space beyond the curbs on each side of the street. This remaining width will dictate minimum and preferred sidewalk width and other potential configurations of space within the pedestrian realm.

The pedestrian route type designations can be used to provide more specific guidance on how to allocate this space in the City. Street classifications not listed above may also deserve Item Number: 2.

consideration for higher pedestrian route type designations if their adjacent land uses will generate significant pedestrian activity.

Pedestrian amenities and street crossing infrastructure and treatments are other elements where pedestrian route types can inform recommended projects. Some examples of pedestrian amenities include: landscaping, types of street lighting, and street furniture. Some examples of street crossing infrastructure and treatments can include: marked crosswalks (high visibility and decorative), curb extensions, pedestrian signal enhancements, traffic signal treatments, improved signage, and crossings at uncontrolled locations with safety treatments. The recommendation and suitability of these treatments will be suggested by route type classification in the following section.

The assignment of pedestrian route types considers the City’s General Plan Pedestrian Plan and Roadways Plan (Mobility Element network), other supporting modal circulation frameworks, and planned land uses. Any classified roadways in the Roadways Plan (e.g., roadways at Collector or above), are recommended to receive either a District, Corridor, or Connector route type designation. The assignment of pedestrian route types should also be reevaluated in conjunction with future updates of the General Plan land uses and/or mobility systems.

Route Type Definitions
The five pedestrian route typologies are defined within this section.

District
The District route type is used to designate Secondary I or II classification streets which have (or are planned to have) the highest pedestrian activity in the City. The District designation should be used on major streets adjacent to significant pedestrian attractors, such as retail areas, entertainment venues, places of civic importance, and mixed use/activity areas which generate pedestrian activity throughout the day.

The sidewalks in Districts should be wider than the Citywide minimum (at least 8’, however 10’ or more preferred) and include space for landscaping and street furniture between the roadway and the walkway (at least 4’, however 6’ or more preferred). Districts should also have pedestrian scale lighting in addition to standard roadway lighting. Street crossings should be equipped with treatments which prioritize pedestrian circulation and safety. Some example standards include:

All signalized intersections should have:
• Continental crosswalk and advanced stop bar
• Pedestrian signal enhancements (automated activation in lieu of pedestrian push buttons, audible signal, countdown timer)
• Lead Pedestrian Interval and/or No Turn on Red
• Protected left turn phases (no permissive left turn) where left-turns overlap street crossings that are longer than four lanes
• Curb ramps with detectable warning strips
Item Number: 2.

All stop-controlled legs of an intersection should have:
• Continental crosswalk and advanced stop bar
• Curb ramps with detectable warning strips
Uncontrolled crosswalks across the major street (if necessary), should have:
• RRFB/flashing lights and warning signage
• Continental crosswalk and yield markings
• Median refuge, if median space exists
Other recommendations:
• Curb extensions (if there is on-street parking) at signalized, all-way stop intersections or existing uncontrolled crosswalks
• Infill for all missing sidewalk and missing curb ramp locations • Daylighting at crosswalk approaches in accordance with Assembly Bill 413 Corridor
The Corridor route type is used to designate streets which have (or are planned to have) moderate to high pedestrian activity in the City. The Corridor designation should be used on major streets adjacent to pedestrian-attracting land uses, typically commercial, but can also be civic land uses, major parks, or schools.

The sidewalks in Corridors should be wider than the Citywide minimum (at least 8’) and include space for landscaping or street furniture between the roadway and the walkway, if additional rightof-way space is available. Corridors should also have pedestrian scale lighting in addition to standard roadway lighting. Street crossings should be equipped with treatments which prioritize pedestrian circulation and safety. Some example standards include:

All signalized intersections should have:
• Continental crosswalk + advanced stop bar
• Pedestrian signal enhancements (audible signal, countdown timer) • Curb ramps with detectable warning strips
All stop-controlled legs of an intersection should have:
• Continental crosswalk + advanced stop bar
• Curb ramps with detectable warning strips
Other recommendations:
• Curb extensions (if there is on-street parking) at signalized, all-way stop intersections or existing uncontrolled crosswalks
• Infill for all missing sidewalk and missing curb ramp locations • Daylighting at crosswalk approaches in accordance with Assembly Bill 413 Item Number: 2.

Connector
The Connector route type is used to designate streets which are not anticipated to have anything more than moderate pedestrian activity in the City. These streets provide connectivity between upper hierarchy classifications (Districts and Corridors) and Neighborhood routes. The Connector designation should be used on any classifications above local, which does not prioritize pedestrian activity or any classification which does not have continuous commercial land uses.

Sidewalks should be present on both sides of the roadway and have a minimum width of 5’, with 6’ as the recommended width. Roadway lighting should be provided in accordance with City standards. A landscaped buffer between the roadway and the walkway is optional, if right-of-way space is available. They should be illuminated with standard street lighting, at a minimum. Basic treatments at street crossings should be included. Some example standards include:

All signalized intersections should have:
• Continental crosswalk + advanced stop bar
• Curb ramps with detectable warning strips
• Daylighting at crosswalk approaches in accordance with Assembly Bill 413 All stop-controlled legs of an intersection should have:
• Continental crosswalk + advanced stop bar
• Curb ramps with detectable warning strips (lower priority) • Daylighting at crosswalk approaches in accordance with Assembly Bill 413 Neighborhood
The Neighborhood route type is used to designate streets which are classified as local in the Roadways Plan (Mobility Element network).

Where feasible and right of way exists, sidewalks should be present on at least one side of streets in this classification and be a minimum of 5’ in width (unless there is a bus stop, a school adjacent to the street, or if the street is a part of a school access route, then it should be required for sidewalks to be present on both sides). Some neighborhoods were planned without consideration for sidewalks and retrofitting may be infeasible. Roadway lighting should be provided in accordance with City standards. A landscaped buffer between the roadway and the walkway is optional, if right-of-way space is available. If the Neighborhood street does not intersect one of the four preceding designations, the intersections should only include curb ramps with detectable warning strips and advance stop bars at stop locations.

Ancillary
The Ancillary route type is used to designate paved public walkways which are not along streets but function as a part of a City’s pedestrian and bicycle circulation system. Core examples of these facilities include multi-use paths, pedestrian bridges and paseos (easements between buildings and private property). As new Ancillary facilities are implemented, their design should provide Item Number: 2.

natural surveillance and be ADA accessible (at access point locations, walkway width and walkway slope). Context sensitive lighting should be provided where feasible.

Desert Hot Springs Pedestrian Route Type Network
The proposed pedestrian route type network was determined by overlaying the City’s planned land uses (Figure LU-3 in the General Plan), the planned circulation network (MI-7), while also referencing the pedestrian plan priority streets (MI-1) and planned bicycle network (MI-5).

Designations were made for existing roadways and some planned yet unbuilt roadways.

As shown, there are Districts recommended along Palm Drive (between 8th Street and Hacienda Avenue) and Pierson Boulevard between (West Drive and Verbena Drive). These extents are within the Arts and Culture Overlay, a roughly one square mile of the City that includes the convergence of these two main streets in the center. Both Palm and Pierson are lined with commercial, mixed use and visitor serving land uses. These District streets are also centered between significant clusters of planned medium and high density residential.

Corridors are recommended along:
• Cholla Drive between 8th Street and Hacienda Avenue
• West Drive between 8th Street and Hacienda Avenue
• Palm Drive between:
o Mission Lakes Boulevard and 8th Street
o 20th Avenue and Hacienda Avenue
• Mesquite Avenue between 8th Street and Hacienda Avenue • Mountain View Road between Desert View Avenue and 15th Street • 8
th Street between Palm Drive and West Drive
• Pierson Boulevard between:
o Atlantic Avenue and West Drive
o Karen Avenue and Indian Canyon Drive
• Hacienda Avenue between West Drive and east city boundary • Two Bunch Palms Road between West Drive and Miracle Hill Road • Dillon Road between West Drive and Avenue Manzana
Connectors are recommended along all other non-local streets, not already identified in the extents listed above. The Connector route type was also assigned to the roadways serving Bella Vista Elementary School and Painted Hills Middle School (Sonora Drive, Avenida Jalisco, and West Drive). Neighborhood routes are recommended along all local streets.

The Ancillary facilities identified in Figure 1 are consistent with off-street Class I bike path segments identified in the Active Transportation Plan’s proposed Bicycle Network.

Item Number: 2.

D
Bicycle Network Development
and Implementation Approaches
Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan Draft
Item Number: 2.

3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310  San Diego, CA 92103  619-795-6086 www.CRAmobility.com
Bicycle Network Development Memo Purpose
This memorandum introduces the proposed bicycle network, provides an overview of bicycle operations and facility classifications, and documents the network development process. The proposed bicycle network was developed to advance the City’s infrastructure towards the Desert Hot Springs Active Transportation Plan (ATP) goals:

1. Integrated & Connected. A multimodal mobility system that seamlessly integrates active transportation users with convenient connections to schools, parks and recreational spaces, transit, commercial areas, and other community resources.

2. Inclusive & Accessible. Facilities that are comfortable, accessible, and ADA-compliant for active transportation users of all ages and abilities.

3. Safe. Infrastructure and behaviors that support safe travel via walking, bicycling and other forms of active transportation.

4. Viable & Sustainable. Active transportation is a viable and sustainable travel option, supported by innovative and context appropriate facilities, technologies, and programs.

Desert Hot Springs Bicycle Network
Figure 1 shows the proposed bicycle network. Note, as the proposed network represents forecasted conditions, some facility recommendations may be reliant on and/or necessitated by future land or roadway network development. Table 1 (at the end of the memo) documents each facility’s extent and classification.

Overview of Bicycle Facility Classifications and Operations Caltrans classifies bicycle facilities into four categories to guide selection and design. Definitions from the California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4 are provided followed by images. • Bike paths or shared use paths, also referred to as “Class I bikeways,” which provide a completely separated right-of-way designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflows by motorists minimized.
• Bike lanes, also referred to as “Class II bikeways,” which provide a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.
• Bike routes, also referred to as “Class III bikeways,” which provide a right-of-way on-street or off-street, designated by signs or permanent markings and shared with pedestrians and motorists.
• Cycle tracks or separated bikeways, also referred to as “Class IV bikeways,” which promote active transportation and provide a right-of-way designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to a roadway and which are separated from vehicular traffic. Types of separation include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, or on-street parking.

Item Number: 2.

Class I Bike Path Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route Class IV Cycle Track
Item Number: 2.

Figure 1: Proposed Bicycle Network
Item Number: 2.

Bicycles are generally allowed on all public roads in California (excluding most freeways) unless restricted by local ordinances. In Desert Hot Springs, the following City Codes further regulate bicycle operations beyond those established through California Code:
• § 10.48.030 Prohibition on public property in posted nonresidential zones. It is unlawful for any person to ride, use or operate any bicycle, skateboard, roller skates, roller blades and/or scooter over any public sidewalk, public pedestrian walkway, or public parking area within any nonresidential zone where the City has posted signs prohibiting such activities. • § 10.48.050 Prohibition on public lawns. It is unlawful for any person to ride, use or operate any bicycle, skateboard, roller skates, roller blades and/or scooter over any public lawn within the City.
• § 10.12.090 Application of regulations to persons riding bicycles or animals. Every person riding a bicycle or motorized bicycle or riding or driving an animal upon a highway has all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this chapter, except those provisions which by their very nature can have no application. • § 10.20.080 Riding or driving within public park. No person shall ride, operate or drive any motor vehicle, motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, motorized bicycle or bicycle upon any portion of any public park in the City, except those portions established by City regulation for the riding and operation thereof such as rights-of-way, public or private, which have been created for the use and operation of such vehicles.

Bicycle Network Development Process
Existing Conditions
The proposed bicycle network was developed with the intent of addressing existing needs while also accounting for long-term planning conditions, such as future development and expansion of the transportation networks. These needs and considerations were documented in the Existing Conditions Report, such as, existing and currently planned bicycle facilities, land uses, travel patterns (as determined through Replica and Strava data sources), collision history, bicycle level of traffic stress, and demographic information (population and employment density, equity considerations). Additionally, the posted speed limits and number of travel lanes – which informed the bicycle level of traffic stress assessment – were also considered, along with the buildout roadway classifications and associated design standards as documented in the Desert Hot Springs General Plan. Excluding Class I Bike Paths, all proposed facilities are intended to fit within the curb-to-curb width of either the existing roadway or General Plan buildout classification of the respective roadway.

Stakeholder and Community Input
Other improvement and development projects identified by City staff through email communications and project meetings, including the initial Stakeholder Working Group meeting and Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant application, contributed to the proposed network. Opportunities or planned projects were identified along Hacienda Avenue, South Palm Drive, Little Morongo Road, Indian Canyon Drive, and Mission Lakes Drive.

Item Number: 2.

CVAG also recently initiated a planning project in partnership with Desert Hot Springs to identify an alignment to extend the regional CV Link into Desert Hot Springs. The CV Link is a planned, partially constructed multi-purpose path spanning the Coachella Valley that is accessible to bicyclists, pedestrians and low-speed neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs). The latest information regarding the CV Link extension into Desert Hot Springs will be incorporated into the Desert Hot Springs networks to the extent possible, however, it is anticipated that the Active Transportation Plan will be completed prior to the CVAG effort, thus implementation may require flexibility to unify and accommodate recommendations from both plans.

Community input was collected through physical and online project surveys and a pop-up event held in July 2025. The feedback received during the initial engagement phase was reviewed during the network development. Public comments primarily voiced the need for bicycle improvements along Pierson Boulevard, 1st Street, Dillon Road, and Palm Drive. Community members also referenced unsafe behaviors from both bicyclists and drivers, which may be addressed through a combination of proper infrastructure and educational efforts. Additionally, concerns were raised about converting vehicle lanes to accommodate bicycle facilities. The draft network will be presented to the community for review and comment during a second engagement phase held in October 2025, consisting of two pop-up events and physical and online surveys.

Best Practices and Guiding Legislation
Best practices and recent State legislation also influenced the assignment of bicycle facilities.

Caltrans Design Information Bulletin-94 (DIB-94) Complete Streets: Contextual Design Guidance (2024) provides guidance and flexibility in the design of context-sensitive facilities to better accommodate Complete Streets projects, such as bicycle facilities, that serve users of all ages and abilities. Figure 5-A Recommended Bicycle Facilities from DIB-94 (depicted below) provides recommended bicycle facility types based on a roadway’s posted speed and average daily traffic.

Given the absence of recent citywide traffic volumes, network decisions were primarily influenced by the posted speed.

Source: Caltrans Design Information Bulletin-94 Complete Streets: Contextual Design Guidance (2024) Item Number: 2.

Senate Bill 1216 went into effect in California as of January 1, 2025, prohibiting the installation of sharrows (Class III Bicycle Route) along roadways with a posted speed limit greater than 30 mph, except at or near an intersection. Two facilities planned in the City of Desert Hot Springs General Plan (2020) were found to conflict with SB1216:
• Camino Campanero, east of Avenido Descanso (40 mph)
• Pierson Boulevard, from West Drive to Verbena Drive (35 mph) Previous Plans
As part of the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant application, Pierson Boulevard is proposed to include Class II Bike Lanes from Golden Eagle Road to Mesquite Avenue.

The Class II Bike Lanes are reflected in the draft Bicycle Network shown in Figure 1, however, it should be noted implementation will require removal of a travel lane or removal of on-street parking and the tree wells.

Additionally, the City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan (2016) identifies a planned Class III Bicycle Route along SR-62 within the City, however, that recommendation was not included in the more recent General Plan. These planned Class III facilities must be changed to a higher facility classification (Class I, II, or IV), removed from the planned network, or have the posted speed limit reduced to 30 mph prior to implementation.

Conclusion
Collectively, the existing conditions, stakeholder and community input, and best practices and guiding legislation considerations identified above were factored into bicycle network development, while being guided by the proposed Desert Hot Springs ATP goals of active transportation networks and facilities that are Integrated & Connected, Inclusive & Accessible, Safe, and Viable & Sustainable.

Item Number: 2.

Table 1: Proposed Bicycle Network by Segment
Roadway Extents Facility General Plan Facility
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Worsley Road Northern City Limit to Pierson Boulevard Class II Buffered Bike Lanes Consistent 25 Karen Avenue Mission Lakes Boulevard to Pierson Boulevard Class II Bike Lanes No facility 25 Indian Canyon Drive Northern City Limit to I-10 Class IV Cycle Track No facility 55 Little Morongo Road Augusta Avenue to 20th St/Varner Road Class I Bike Path Consistent (shorter extent) 40-55 Sonora Drive Via Del Sol to Mission Lakes Boulevard Class III Bike Route No facility 25 Wash extending from
Painted Hills MS/Bella
Vista Elementary
Avenida Jalisco to Pierson Boulevard Class I Bike Path Consistent N/A Cholla Drive Mission Lakes Boulevard to Two Bunch Palms Trail Class III Bike Route Consistent (shorter extent) 25 West Drive Northern Terminus to Mission Lakes Boulevard Class III Bike Route Consistent 30-35 Flood Channel Parallel
to Santa Cruz Road Casa Grande Dr to 8th St Class I Bike Path Consistent N/A Santa Cruz Road West Drive to Casa Grande Drive Class III Bike Route No facility 25 Cactus Drive Palm Drive to Two Bunch Palms Trail Class III Bike Route Consistent (shorter extent) 25 Palm Drive Mission Lakes Boulevard to Pierson Boulevard Class IV Cycle Track Consistent 35 Palm Drive Pierson Boulevard to Ironwood Drive Class II Buffered Bike Lanes Consistent 35 Palm Drive Ironwood Drive to I-10 Class IV Cycle Track Consistent 35-60 Casa Grande Drive Santa Cruz Road to Valencia Drive Class III Bike Route No facility 25 Valencia Drive Casa Grande Drive to Mission Lakes Road Class III Bike Route No facility 25 Ocotillo Road Palm Drive to Two Bunch Palms Trail Class III Bike Route Consistent (shorter extent) 25 Mesquite Avenue Yuca Drive to Ocotillo Road Class II Bike Lanes Class III 25 Verbena Drive Mission Lakes Boulevard to 8th Street Class III Bike Route Consistent 25 Verbena Drive
Connection 8th Street/Verbena Drive to Terrace Way/Verbena Drive Class I Bike Path Consistent N/A Item Number: 2.