2. Engagement Process
Community engagement for the Plan will include the following steps, as illustrated in Figure 1:
• Identify stakeholders
• Engage stakeholders
• Analyze feedback
Figure 1: Stakeholder Engagement Process
2.1 Stakeholder Identification
The Project Team will identify stakeholders that may have an interest in shaping the outcomes of the Plan, including those that aren’t yet aware the Plan is underway. These stakeholders generally fall into one of two categories:
• Agency Partners: Agencies responsible for project implementation, whether direct or indirect (e.g., agency departments, elected leaders)
• Community Partners: Community members who may be affected by or interested in changes to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, policies, and/or programs in Dublin Agency Partners
Stakeholders include City of Dublin staff in Planning, Public Works, Parks, Community Services, and Dublin Police Services; Alameda County Fire Department; Dublin Unified School District; and elected/appointed representatives and other institutions (e.g., Kaiser Hospital), which influence transportation policy and project implementation.
Community Partners
The City’s residents, businesses, bike shops (e.g., Dublin Cyclery), and groups such as Bike East Bay, Walk the Trail, and the Chamber of Commerce, will be interested in and impacted by the implementation of projects and policies defined in the Plan. Therefore, these community partners are an important group of stakeholders.
Step 1
Identify Stakeholders
•Step 1.1:
Identify agency
partners
•Step 1.2:
Identify community
partners
Step 2
Engage Stakeholders
•Step 2.1:
Partner with
agencies and
community groups
•Step 2.2:
Consult engaged
community
members
•Step 2.3:
Inform the general
public to increase
participation
Step 3
Analyze Feedback
•Step 3.1:
Document and
address feedback
received during
engagement
•Step 3.2:
Establish
mechanisms for
continuity in
relationships
552
2.2 Engagement Strategy & Activities
This section describes:
• The committees that will interface with the Project Team • The activities that will be designed when consulting appropriate stakeholders at major decision-making points
• The communication plan used to keep the public informed and to increase participation in the activities described
Governing Groups and Committees
The Project Team will form a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to provide key guidance. The Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) serves as the Dublin’s BPAC and will also provide important input.
1. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
o Members: See Appendix 1 for public agency representatives from various departments in Dublin
o Role: The TAC will be consulted at five key project milestones and will be responsible for shaping the direction and outcomes of the Plan. Prior to TAC meetings, the Project Team will prepare meeting materials, and support the Project Manager in correspondence with TAC members. During TAC meetings, the Project Team will share relevant Plan information, review findings, discuss concerns and tradeoffs, and seek the TAC’s guidance on Plan recommendations.
o Frequency: See Table 1 for a tentative meeting schedule, topics, and outcomes.
2. Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) o Members: Current BPAC members
o Role: Solicit input from the Alameda CTC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee to provide additional guidance and support for the draft Plan.
o Frequency: Introduce the Plan at the BPAC’s April 30 meeting and then update BPAC throughout the Plan process as appropriate.
Table 1: TAC Meeting Topics and Target Outcomes
Anticipated
Date
Topics Target Outcomes
Meeting #1
March 2020
(Phase 1)
Introduce the Plan process
Share the Community Engagement Plan
Solicit input on the project vision
Establish collective understanding of the
Plan and planning process
Obtain feedback on Community
Engagement Plan and upcoming
stakeholder engagement
Obtain input on project vision
Meeting #2
May 2020
(Phase I)
Review and discuss preliminary existing conditions
Update on community outreach
Review draft vision and goals
Obtain feedback on draft existing
conditions findings
Obtain feedback on draft vision and goals
Meeting #3
Fall 2020
(Phase 2)
Review preliminary findings from needs analysis
Update on community outreach
Share findings from needs assessment
Solicit input on recommendations for
policy, program, and infrastructure
elements
Meeting #4
Winter 2021
Draft prioritization approach and plan
recommendations
Obtain feedback on draft prioritization
approach and Plan recommendations
553
(Phase 2)
Meeting #5
Spring 2021
(Phase 3)
Present draft Plan for review and comment Obtain feedback on draft Plan Community Engagement Activities
In addition to the ongoing partnerships described above, community engagement for the Plan includes activities to solicit input from the Dublin community on walking and biking, shown in Table 2. At key points in the technical work, the Consultant Team will summarize the feedback received from these engagement activities to incorporate into findings and recommendations. A wide range of community stakeholders will be consulted in the development of these activities to help:
• Identify potential gaps in the Project Team’s understanding of existing conditions • Obtain feedback on feasible alternatives from a broad spectrum of current and potential pedestrians and bicyclists
• Cultivate community support for future implementation
554
Table 2: Outreach Activities During Each Plan Phase
Phase Activity Purpose and Target Outcomes
Phase I: Project
Launch (Feb – Oct
2020)
One (1) workshop; City’s biannual transportation
community workshop
Inform the public about the Plan and gather broad community feedback
Establish collective understanding of the planning process; Obtain feedback on project vision
Two (2) pop-up events;
potential locations are
listed in Appendix 2
Inform the public about the Plan and gather broad community feedback
Assess qualitative priorities in various neighborhoods Meet residents at local events or meetings, and also advertise the events to the broader community
Two (2) public meetings
(e.g. City Council or
Commissions)
Provide support to City staff and answer stakeholders’ questions Distribute flyers/
postcards/business cards to
various community
locations
Spread information and interest in the Plan via Dublin’s community facilities, library, trailheads, and through other City locations/programs
Advertise interactive online map and other ways to provide input
Website and online map Will be updated at key project milestones and will provide information about the Plan development and events
Online map will give the public the opportunity to identify desired improvements, gaps, and key destinations in the existing bicycle and pedestrian network
Inform elected officials Inform the City Council that the Plan is kicking off and invite them to sign up for future project emails, if interested Phase 2: Review of
Draft Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Improvements (Nov
2020 through Apr
2021)
Two (2) pop-up events;
potential locations are
listed in Appendix 2
Inform the public about the Plan and gather broad community feedback on draft Plan elements
Assess qualitative priorities in various neighborhoods Meet residents at local events or meetings, and also advertise the event to the broader community
One (1) Walking Tour Investigate existing conditions with Bike East Bay, Walk the Trail, and other community stakeholders
Gather specific input on pedestrian and bicycle facilities, network gaps, and infrastructure needs
Two (2) public meetings
(e.g. City Council or
Commissions)
Provide support to City staff and answer stakeholders’ questions Website and online map
and PUBLIC SURVEY
Project website will be updated at key project milestones and will provide information about the Plan development and events
Online map will give the public the opportunity to review the proposed network/improvements and provide input
Phase 3: Draft and
Final Plan
One (1) workshop; City’s biannual Transportation
Community Workshop
Gather broad community feedback
Assess qualitative priorities across the City
Obtain feedback on draft Plan elements
Two (2) public meetings
(e.g. City Council or
Commissions)
Provide support to City staff and answer stakeholders’ questions Website Project website will be updated at key project milestones and will provide information about the Plan development and events
555
Plan Communications
Plan communication tools are summarized in Table 3 and rely on electronic communication channels (i.e., City of Dublin, City PIO (Public Information Officer), and partner websites; social media accounts; stakeholder email lists; and Dublin Library and facilities). Content will be published concurrently with Plan milestones to keep the public up-to-date on the Plan’s status, help identify additional stakeholders, and increase participation in the outreach activities described in Table 2.
The Consultant Team will also work with local community and business organizations to expand the reach of the Plan’s communication channels. Appendix 3 offers a preliminary list of stakeholder organizations.
Table 3: Plan Communication Tools
Activity Purpose Occurrence Target Outcomes
Flyer/
Postcard/
Business Card
Share Plan information with
the public during Phase I
Develop an initial
flyer at outset of
Plan; distribute
on two separate
dates
Spread information and build interest in the Plan
via Dublin’s facilities; Library, trailhead message
boards, and through other City locations (e.g., bike
lockers at BART, bus shelters)
Website Broadly share Plan materials
and provide a platform for
additional community
participation
The website will
be updated at key
milestones
Document outreach meetings
Link to/embed the online map
Allow the public to provide feedback on the Draft
Plan
Social Media Broadly share Plan materials
and encourage additional
community participation
using the City’s existing
platforms
As appropriate
throughout the
Plan
City to promote the Plan website, online map, inperson outreach events, and Plan milestones on existing City platforms
Plan email list Keep interested parties
informed about key
milestones and outreach
touch points
As appropriate
throughout the
Plan
Keep interested parties updated on Plan status and
highlight opportunities to share feedback
Help market outreach meetings and other feedback
opportunities
Help increase interest and engagement in outreach
activities
On-Demand
Language
Interpretation
Service
A phone-based service that
provides interpretation in
244 languages
As appropriate
throughout the
Plan
Permits an increase in community stakeholders’
participation in certain outreach activities
described in Table 2
Engage stakeholders effectively and equitably
PartnerOrganization
Outreach
Leverage partnerships with
organizations interested in
transportation to reach their
constituencies
As appropriate
throughout the
Plan
Keep organizations’ constituents updated on Plan
status and highlight opportunities to share
feedback
Help market outreach meetings and other feedback
opportunities
Help increase interest and thus improve
engagement in outreach activities
Online Engagement
This section describes the approach for the Plan website, social media communications, and online map.
Plan Website
Online engagement tools will complement in-person outreach efforts. The Project Team will create a robust and customized online content management system (CMS) with significant capabilities and potential. This section 556
describes the initial framework for the CMS tool, but further customization is possible throughout the span of the planning process depending on project needs.
All aspects of the online tool will be fully accessible (compliant with the most stringent Federal accessibility standards) and will be easily utilized from both computers and various mobile devices. Optional demographic surveys will allow the project team to assess who is interacting with the online engagement tools and use this information to make decisions regarding in-person engagement (i.e., geographies or demographics that aren’t represented can be further emphasized).
Content for publication
The CMS tool will provide a central storehouse for all general project information that might be of interest to stakeholders, for example:
• Project scope and timeline
• Agendas, minutes, and presentations from relevant meetings • Connections to/from other relevant project websites
• Upcoming outreach events
Content to encourage discourse
In addition to providing static information, the CMS tool will be leveraged at multiple points during the planning process to solicit feedback from stakeholders and to share sophisticated project information. These mechanisms will include interactive online survey maps.
Social media
Social media engagement seeks to increase conversation around the project, reach target demographics that are outside currently engaged demographics, and successfully solicit feedback at various project stages.
Mechanisms for advertising the online assets
Regardless of how robust they are, online engagement platforms are only as useful as the amount of traffic that they receive and who they are able to reach. Recognizing the importance of driving traffic to the web assets, the Project Team will develop multiple channels to advertise the project website and tools, including the City and partners’ email distribution lists, social media, project collateral, and in-person outreach.
2.3 Documentation and Transition of Stakeholder Relationships This aspect of the engagement process focuses on documenting the outreach efforts as well as ensuring continuity between planning and implementation.
The Consultant Team will establish mechanisms for continuity in stakeholder relationships by providing the stakeholder database to the City and making all online assets made available to City for future use. The Team will indicate if follow-up with specific demographics or individuals may be recommended.
Documentation will include activity summaries for each of the three outreach phases as well as a summary outreach report. The Consultant Team will transfer all engagement materials and files to the City for future use or reference. All outreach efforts will be documented and summarized in a summary outreach report, which will be folded into the final Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
557
Appendix 1: Potential TAC Members
Contact Email Designation Agency/Department Confirmed
Kristie
Wheeler [email protected]
Assistant Community Development
Director Planning Yes
Bridget
Amaya [email protected]
Assistant Parks & Community Services
Director
Parks & Community
Service Yes
Chris
Stevens [email protected]
Chief Facilities Operations Officer;
Office 925-828-2551 ext. 8061, Cell
925-557-0109
Dublin Unified School
District
Verbal ok/No
email
confirmation
yet
Kevin
Monaghan [email protected] Traffic Sergeant
Dublin Police
Department Yes
Darrell
Jones [email protected] Deputy Fire Marshall
Dublin Fire
Department Yes
Lisa
Bobadilla [email protected]
Division Manager, Transportation
Division, Public Works City of San Ramon Yes
Cedric
Novenario
cnovenario@cityofpleasantonca.
gov Senior Traffic Engineer City of Pleasanton Yes
Julie Chiu [email protected] Associate Civil Engineer City of Livermore Yes-Include
both
Andy Ross [email protected] Assistant Planner City of Livermore Yes-Include
both
Hazel
Wetherford [email protected] Economic Development Director City Manager’s Office Yes John
Stefanski [email protected] Assistant to the City Manager City Manager’s Office Yes Christopher
Marks [email protected] Associate Transportation Planner Alameda CTC Yes Sergio Ruiz [email protected] Branch Chief for Active Transportation Caltrans Yes Jake
Freedman [email protected] East Alameda County liaison Caltrans Yes Mariana
Parreiras [email protected]
Project Manager, BART Planning,
Development & Construction,
510.464.6169 BART
Emailed the
contact- Not
confirmed
yet
Cyrus Sheik [email protected] LAVTA Yes
Appendix 2: Potential Pop-Up Locations
Event Date Phase Location
Shamrock 5k Fun Run
& Walk Sunday, March 15, at 8:30 a.m. Phase 1 Dublin
Saint Patrick’s Day
Festival
Saturday, March 14 & Sunday,
March 15
Phase 1 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA
Bike East Bay – Family
Cycling Workshops
Saturday, March 28, 2020 |10 a.m.
– 1 p.m.
Phase 1 2100 E Cantara Drive
Dublin Farmers’
Market
Thursdays, beginning April 2, 4:00
p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
Thursday, May 28 – Bike to Market
Day
Phase 1 or 2
Emerald Glen Community
Park, Dublin, CA
Dublin Pride Volunteer
Day Saturday, April 25 8 a.m. -1 p.m. Phase 1 Emerald Glen Park, Gleason Dr., Dublin 558
Cinderella Ride 2020 Saturday, March 28, 2020 Phase 1 Las Positas College – Livermore, CA
Dublin Pride Week
Workshops Saturday April 25 - May 3 Phase 1 Various locations throughout Dublin Bike Commuting 101 Thursday, April 30 Phase 1 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA Bike to Work Day Thursday, May 14, 2020 Phase 1 East and West Dublin BART, Dublin, CA
Community Bike Ride May 16, 2020 Phase 1 11-mile ride between City of Pleasanton and City of Dublin
Spring Eggstravaganza Saturday, April 11, 2020 | 8:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Phase 1 4201 Central Parkway
Picnic Flix Fri, June 12 | Fri, July 31| Fri, Aug
21 Phase 1 4201 Central Parkway
Family Campout
June 20-21, 3:00 p.m. – 10:00 a.m.
July 11-12, 3:00 p.m. – 10:00 a.m.
August 8-9, 3:00 p.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Phase 1 Emerald Glen Park
Alamo Creek Park
Schaefer Ranch Park
Dublin Heritage Park
and Museums
Music Jams & Hands-On History
Day
Phase 1 6600 Donlon Way, Dublin, CA
Splatter September 12 Phase 1 Emerald Glen Park, 4201
Central Parkway, Dublin, CA
Walk and Roll to School
First week of October, planning
meetings with schools in Sept.
Could promote plan @ meeting and
ask site leads to distribute info or
host workshop @ school
Phase 2
Homecoming Parade TBD Phase 2 Dublin High School
Dublin Senior Center
Info. Fair October 3, 2020 Phase 2
The Wave Swim lessons, swim meets, etc. Phase 2
Dublin Library Tabling at entrance during peak use Phase 2 Appendix 3: Stakeholder Organizations
Organization Website Number & Email
WHEELS https://www.wheelsbus.com/ 925-828-0231
[email protected]
Dial-a-Ride https://www.wheelsbus.com/ 925-455-7510
[email protected]
Bike East Bay https://bikeeastbay.org/ [email protected] The Trail Group
Valley Spokesmen Bicycle
Club https://www.valleyspokesmen.org 925-828-5299 [email protected] Indians in Dublin, Ca Facebook Link
Asian Pacific Islander
American Public Affairs https://www.apapa.org 916-928-9988 [email protected] Integrity in Action Dublin-integrity-in-action.org [email protected] Chamber of Commerce www.dublinchamberofcommerce.org
925-828-6200, Inge Houston,
CEO/President,
[email protected]
Innovation Tri-Valley Lynn Naylor, CEO,
[email protected]
Dublin Senior Foundation 925-833-1866
Dublin Community
Foundation http://www.dublinfoundation.org/ 614-889-2001 559
New Life Church www.newlifeinfo.com 925-355-9200
Muslim Community Center https://mcceastbay.org/ 925-485-1786 [email protected]
Valley Christian Center www.comediscovervcc.org 925-560-6202 Blazing Fire Church https://blazingfire.org/home 925-264-9161 [email protected]
Dublin Art Collective Facebook.com/DublinArtCa
Sri Panchamukha Hanuman
Temple https://panchamukhahanuman.org/ 510-926-7638 [email protected] Dublin Fighting Irish http://www.dublinfightingirish.org 510-714-1439 [email protected]
Tri-Valley Convention and
Visitor’s Bureau 925-846-8910
Tri-Valley YMCA 925-263-4444
Women’s Club of Dublin/San
Ramon https://dsrwomensclub.org/ 925-828-0231 [email protected] Dublin Sister City
Association Facebook Link 925-899-4771
Dublin Partners in Education www.dpie.org 925-828-2551 x8024 Dublin Lions Club 925-828-6636
[email protected]
Girl Scouts https://www.crossroadsgirlscouts.com/ 800-447-4475 [email protected]
Boy Scouts of America http://www.sfbac.org/about/ebscoutshop 925-785-4518 [email protected]
Dublin Historical
Preservation Association http://dhpa.org/ [email protected] Dublin 4-H https://www.dublin4h.com/
925-462-4518
[email protected]
[email protected]
Child Care Links https://behively.org/ 925-417-8733
[email protected]
BART Kamala Parks, [email protected]
Senior Support Programs of
the Tri-Valley
Alameda County Safe Routes
to School http://alamedacountysr2s.org/ [email protected] Kaiser Permanente
Ronald Wetter, Community &
Governmental Relations Manager,
[email protected]
Zeiss Meditec Mark Boyd, Sr. Facilities Manager,
[email protected]
Vagaro HQ Kerry Melchoir, Director of Operations,
[email protected]
TriNet HQ Jay Meyer, Director of Facilities,
[email protected]
Patelco Credit Union HQ
Cara Houck, Community and Corporate
Social Responsibility Specialist,
[email protected]
AEye HQ Jennifer Deitsch, Communications
Director
Ross Stores HQ Lynn Mayate, Corporate HR,
[email protected]
Graybar Kristian Reyes,
[email protected]
560
Chabot Las Positas
Community College District
Julia Dozier, District Executive Director,
[email protected]
Dublin San Ramon Services
District Judy Zavadil, [email protected]
Camp Parks Brian Lucid, Analyst,
[email protected]
Tri-Valley Career Center Sarah Holtzclaw, Program Manager, [email protected]
Federal Corrections Institute
Alameda County
(Courthouse, Office of
Emergency Services, County
Jail)
561
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
SUMMARY:
PROJECT
FACTSHEET
APPENDIX A
562
Vision & Goals
Existing Conditions
Project & Program
Recommendations
Draft & Final Plan
APR
2020 2021 2022
JUN AUG OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC FEB APR MAY
GOALS
Enhance Safety Prioritize
safety in design and
implementation of walking
and biking facilities.
Increase Walking and
Biking Support biking and
walking as attractive modes
of transportation.
Improve Connectivity
Develop a bicycle and
pedestrian network that
provides well-connected
facilities for users of all ages
and abilities.
Enhance Accessibility
Utilize principles of
universal design to make
biking and walking a viable
transportation option for
all, including people with
disabilities.
Prioritize Investments
Maintain sufficient funding
to provide for existing
and future bicycle and
pedestrian needs, including
supporting programs and
operation and maintenance.
Leverage biking and walking
projects to promote
economic activity and social
equity outcomes among
people of all ages and
abilities
BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN
MASTER PLAN
OUR VISION
The City of Dublin is a vibrant place where walking and biking are safe, comfortable, and convenient ways to travel and connect individuals, inclusive of all ages and abilities, to local and regional destinations.
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA 94568
(925) 833-6630 | (925) 833-6651 FAX
www.dublin.ca.gov
Email us at:
[email protected]
GET INVOLVED
Go to www.
dublinbikeped.org to
learn more and provide
input to inform the
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan.
Please fill out our Public Survey!
563
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
SUMMARY:
PUBLIC SURVEY
APPENDIX A
564
The City of Dublin is updating its Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan to further the Dublin’s commitment to create a walk- and bike-friendly community. The Plan will include goals and recommendations to ensure that walking and biking in Dublin is safe, comfortable, and fun for all ages and abilities.
This survey is intended to better understand travel
behavior of residents who walk and bike in Dublin. This data will be used to inform the program, policy, and project recommendations. This survey will take approximately 7
minutes to complete, and the information collected will be confidential and used solely to inform the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan update.
To learn more about the City of Dublin’s Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan update, please visit the project website:
www.DublinBikePed.org.
The more survey responses we get, the better informed our Plan will be. Please share this survey with your friends, colleagues, family, and neighbors!
General Travel Habits
1. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, how frequently did you use each of the following options to travel to work or school?
Check the appropriate boxes.
Never
Less
than
once a
month
1-3
days a
month
At
least
once a
week
Drive alone in personal car, truck,
van, or motorcycle
Carpool with others (car or van)
Public transit (Bus, BART)
Paratransit
Employer-provided shuttle
Personal Bicycle
Bike share
Scooter share/personal scooter
Walk
Taxi (Includes Uber, Lyft etc.)
Use wheelchair/mobility aid
Combination of multiple travel
modes (bike to a transit station,
drive to a vanpool location, etc.)
2. After the COVID-19 pandemic, how frequently will you use each of the following options to travel to work or school?
Check the appropriate boxes.
Never
Less
than
once a
month
1-3
days a
month
At
least
once a
week
Drive alone in personal car,
truck, van, or motorcycle
Carpool with others (car or van)
Public transit (Bus, BART)
Paratransit
Employer-provided shuttle
Personal Bicycle
Bike share
Scooter share/personal scooter
Walk
Taxi (Includes Uber, Lyft etc.)
Use wheelchair/mobility aid
Combination of multiple travel
modes (bike to a transit station,
drive to a vanpool location, etc.)
3. On Question 1, if you selected “Combination of multiple travel modes,” what travel modes are involved in your trip?
Check all that apply.
Personal vehicle (drive alone)
Carpool / Vanpool
Public Transit
Paratransit
Employer-provided shuttle
Personal Bicycle
Bike share
Scooter share/personal scooter
Walk
Use a wheelchair/mobility aid
Taxi (Includes Uber, Lyft, etc.)
Other:
______________________________________________
565
4. If you most often drive alone to work, which of the following are the main reasons?
Check all that apply.
Don’t usually drive alone to get to work
Driving alone is quickest/most convenient option
Privacy
Safety
Cost of other transportation options is prohibitive
Irregular work schedule
Need to make additional stops on the way to or from work, or in the middle of the day
Work reasons/commitments
Don’t have access to or want to take a shower at work if I walk or bike
Too hard to get to transit stop/station from home
Too hard to get to transit stop/station from work
Public transportation or paratransit are not available or convenient Sidewalks are not traversable while using a wheelchair or mobility aid
The route I would use does not have curb ramps
Tactile warning surfaces (such as yellow truncated domes) are either confusing or not present
Weather
Insufficient bike parking
Other, please specify:
_______________________________________________
5. Do you have school-aged children?
Yes
No
Prefer not to answer
6. If you have children, how do your child(ren) typically travel to/from school? (Check all that apply.)
Walk
Dropped off in a personal vehicle
School bus
Public transportation (bus/rail)
Paratransit, wheelchair or mobility aid
Bike
Scooter
Drive themselves alone or with siblings
Other:
_______________________________________________
7. If you have children, please indicate which, if any, of the following factors discourage your child(ren) from traveling to/from school by biking, using a scooter, walking or using a wheelchair/mobility aid. (Check all that apply.)
Takes too long / distance to school
Inconvenient
Not safe from traffic
Not safe from crime
It isn’t “cool”/peer pressure
Lack of bicycle facilities
Lack of sidewalks
Lack of curb ramps
Tactile warning surfaces (such as yellow truncated domes) between sidewalk and street are either confusing or not present Sidewalks in poor condition (cracks, uneven surface, etc.) or obstacles on the sidewalk (light poles, trees, etc.)
Insufficient bike parking
Other:
_______________________________________________
Walking and Biking in Dublin
8. How important are the following potential barriers when considering whether to bike, walk or travel using a
wheelchair/mobility aid somewhere, like to work or to run errands?
Not
important
Somewhat
important
Very
important
Cars go too fast and/or are too
close to the sidewalk
The existing sidewalks,
bicycle facilities, and trails are
not maintained properly
Existing sidewalks, bicycle
facilities and trails do not
provide safe access for my
wheelchair or mobility aid
There isn't enough lighting in
the areas where I would walk
or bike
Crossing the street feels
dangerous
It is inconvenient to get to
close-by destinations (grocery
stores, jobs, schools, parks,
transit stations)
There is not enough shade to
keep me comfortable on the
walk or bike/scooter ride
Are we missing anything
important? Please write in
comment box
9. What is your favorite street to bike, walk or travel on using a wheelchair or mobility aid in Dublin, and why?
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
10. What types of improvements would encourage you travel more in Dublin by biking, walking or by wheelchair/mobility aid? Select up to three.
Better/more bicycle facilities
Better/more sidewalks and trails
Lower vehicle speeds and/or more traffic calming infrastructure (ex.
Curb extensions, etc.)
More pedestrian countdown signals and pedestrian hybrid beacons at intersections
Improved street lighting
More marked crosswalks at intersections and/or in the middle of the block
Better maintenance of existing sidewalks, bicycle facilities, and paths
Employer incentives to walk or bike to work
Better sidewalk, bicycle facility, and trail connections to transit stops/stations
More trees, shade, benches or other amenities along my route More curb ramps and audible pedestrian push buttons
Additional short- and long-term secure bike parking for all types of bicycles
Additional onboard bike parking on transit
Other:
______________________________________________
566
11. Where should the City prioritize walking improvements first? Select up to three.
Places where pedestrians are involved in traffic crashes On routes connecting people to schools, libraries, and parks On routes connecting people to transit stops
To serve people who rely on walking the most (such as those who have limited access to vehicles or transit)
Along and across busy streets
On streets connecting to businesses
In areas with the most people walking
Other:
_______________________________________________
12. Where should the City prioritize biking improvements first? Select up to three.
Places where bicyclists are involved in traffic crashes On routes connecting people to schools, libraries, and parks On routes connecting people to transit stops
To serve people who rely on biking the most (such as those who have limited access to vehicles or transit)
At trail intersections
Along and across busy streets
On streets connecting to businesses
In areas with the most people biking
Other
_______________________________________________
Is there anything else you’d like to tell us about biking, walking or using a wheelchair/mobility aid in Dublin?
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
About You
The following questions will help City staff ensure that people throughout Dublin and from different backgrounds are
participating in this process. Remember that your responses to the survey questions are completely anonymous.
13. What are the cross streets nearest to your home address? (Enter as you would in Google Maps…example response: “Dublin
Boulevard and Regional Street, Dublin, CA”)?
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
14. Your age
5-14 years old
15-24 years old
25-44 years old
45-64 years old
65+ years old
Prefer not to respond
15. Other than yourself, are any members of your household:
(Check all that apply.)
Under age 18
Over age 65
Not applicable
Prefer not to respond
16. What is your gender identity?
Female
Male
Gender non-conforming
(Please specify):
______________________________________________
Prefer not to respond
17. How do you identify your race/ethnicity? (Select all that apply.) White
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Chinese
Filipino
Asian Indian
Vietnamese
Korean
Japanese
Other Asian
Native Hawaiian
Samoan
Chamorro
Other Pacific Islander
Other
Prefer not to respond
18. Do you have a motor vehicle available for your use? Yes
No
______________________________________________
Thank You!
19. Thank you for participating in this survey! The information you provided is an important part of developing the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update.
20. Do you have suggestions about issues or improvements to specific locations in Dublin? If so, we encourage you to also submit comments using the project’s online interactive map, accessible at www.DublinBikePed.org
567
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
EXISTING
CONDITIONS:
PROGRAM &
POLICY REVIEW
APPENDIX B
568
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MEMORANDUM Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies
Date: June 5, 2020 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
From: Quinn Wallace; Erin Ferguson, PE, RSP; Amanda Leahy, AICP Subject: Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies The City of Dublin (City) is updating the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2014 Plan).
The Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update (Plan) will serve as a comprehensive action plan for the City to provide improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities for its residents, employees, and visitors. As part of the baseline conditions and needs assessment, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) isinventorying existing programs and policiesrelated to walking and biking. This memorandum (memo) details this inventory and key themes from interviews conducted with representatives of seven City departments and the Dublin Unified School District. The memo is organized into the following sections:
Document Review Summary
Benchmarking Interviews Summary
Programs Overview
Key Needs and Recommendations
Appendix: Interview Questionnaires
DOCUMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
This section summarizes current and draft policies and planning documents that are the most relevant to this Plan. Documents shown in
Table 1 were reviewed and summarized in thissection with the intent to guide the active transportation goals, policies, and projects presented in this Plan. In addition to the documents identified in Table 1, the Plan will coordinate with upcoming efforts, including the Local Roadway Safety Plan and ADA Transition Plan. Following Table 1, each plan is described in greater detail and organized by scale chronologically.
569
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 1: Relationship to Approved and Ongoing Plans
Plan
Bicycle
Policies
Pedestrian
Policies
Facility/
Network
Maps
Design
Guidelines
Design
Concepts
Program
Recommendations
State and Regional Plans
California Green Building
Code
Countywide Active
Transportation Plan (2019)
Caltrans District 4 Bike
Plan
Local Plans
Streetscape Master Plan
(2009)
Complete Streets Policy
(City Council Resolution
199‐12) (2012)
Dublin Boulevard Bikeway
Corridor and Connectivity
Studies (2013)
Pedestrian Safety
Assessment (2014)
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan (2014)
General
Plan Land
Use &
Circulation
(2014)
Circulation
& Scenic
Highways
Element
Schools,
Public
Lands, &
Utilities
Element
Parks and Recreation
Master Plan (2015)
570
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Plan
Bicycle
Policies
Pedestrian
Policies
Facility/
Network
Maps
Design
Guidelines
Design
Concepts
Program
Recommendations
Iron Horse Regional Trail
Feasibility Study (2017)
Traffic Safety Study Update
(2018)
Climate Action Plan (2020)
Downtown Streetscape
Master Plan (2020)
Local Road Safety Plan (in
progress)
ADA Transition Plan (in
progress)
Specific
Plans
Dublin
Crossing
(2013)
Downtown
(2014)
Dublin
Village
Historic
Area (2014)
Eastern
Dublin
(2016)
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2020.
State and Regional Plans
State and regional plans pertinent to the Plan are summarized in this section. A summary of additional state and regional plans are included in the existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
California Green Building Standards Code
According to Chapter 8.76 of the City of Dublin’s Municipal Code, bicycle parking and support facilities in both residential and non‐residential development shall conform to the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). The CALGreen Code includes both mandatory and voluntary measures. 571
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
For non‐residential buildings, it is mandatory that both short‐term and long‐term bicycle parking is provided and secure. Generally, the number of long‐term bicycle parking spaces must be at least 5% of the number of vehicle parking spaces. Schools have additional requirements so that both students and staff have access to sufficient bicycle parking.
Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans (2012)
The Alameda Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans established policies at the county level to augment regional and local bicycle and pedestrian plans, programs, and goals. Following a wave of legislative and regulatory changes intended to link transportation and land use planning (such as AB 32), the plans envisioned a transportation system that is multimodal, safe, accessible, affordable, and equitable, integrated, and more. In 2012, a total of $390 million (7% of total program funding) was dedicated to bicycle and pedestrian projectsthroughout the County. Two active transportation projects were identified in Dublin: the Alamo Canal Trail under I‐580 and Gap Closure and Development of the Iron Horse Trail.
Countywide Active Transportation Plan (2019)
The 2019 Countywide Active Transportation Plan (CATP) combines updates of the Countywide Bicycle Plan and Countywide Pedestrian Plan. The CATP includes an analysis of low stress bike networks, identifies a countywide high injury pedestrian and bicycle network, evaluates major barriers to the bicycle and pedestrian network, and establishes a framework for prioritizing projects of countywide significance to inform decision‐making around active transportation funding at Alameda County Transportation Commission. At the local level, the CATP providesresourcesto member agenciesto help advance projectsthat provide complete,safe, and connected networksfor biking and walking, including better connectionsto the regional transit network. Connectivity analysis presented in the CATP indicate that the East planning area, which includesthe City of Dublin, generally has poorlow‐stress connectivity in the rural and outlying suburban areas, and the business park portions of Dublin and Pleasanton.
Based on the high injury network analysis completed in the CATP, the combined bicycle and pedestrian high injury network mileage represents less than one percent of total countywide high injury network mileage. Within the East planning area, Dublin Boulevard from Arnold Drive to Hacienda Drive and Village Parkway from Davona Drive to Tamarack Drive experience the highest bicycle collision severity score and Dublin Boulevard was identified as the street with the most mileage on the pedestrian high injury network.
Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan
The Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan evaluates bicycle needs on and acrossthe State transportation network and identifies priority bicycle projects. Projects are classified by prioritization categories of top tier, mid tier, and low tier. The following projects are recommended for Dublin:
Top Tier Project:
572
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
o Santa Rita Road and I‐580: Interchange reconstruction (ramps only), Class IIB facility Mid Tier Project:
o Tassajara Creek and I‐580: New separated crossing
o Alcosta Boulevard and I‐680: Minor interchange improvements (signage and striping), Class II facility
Low Tier Project:
Demarcus Boulevard and I‐580: New separated crossingLocal Plans Existing and draft plans with relevant plans, policies, and goals are described in this section of the non‐ infrastructure inventory.
Streetscape Master Plan (2009)
This Master Plan maximizes opportunities to craft an urban image unique to Dublin and to maintain existing amenities like street trees. Goals of the Streetscape Master Plan range from coordinating improvements and responsibilities for Dublin’s streets to strengthening the streetscape design of Dublin Boulevard. In the context of active transportation, the Streetscape Master Plan is a particularly valuable resource for identifying and implementing street improvements that contribute to Dublin’s image.
Complete Streets Policy (City Council Resolution 199‐12) (2012) The City of Dublin’s Complete Streets Policy identifies complete streets planning as a critical contributor to:
Increase walking, biking, and taking transit,
Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and
Meet greenhouse gas reduction goals.
Together, these targets are intended to result in public health benefits. The Policy emphasizes community engagement to remain sensitive to land use and context and coordination with nearby jurisdictions to connect infrastructure across city boundaries. The Policy names several improvements that should be considered to benefit all users of the street, including sidewalks, shared use paths, bike lanes and routes, accessible curb ramps, and more.
Dublin Boulevard Bikeway Corridor and Connectivity Studies (2013) Two studies completed in 2013 that evaluated options for improving bicycling conditions on Dublin Boulevard, particularly in Downtown Dublin. A traffic analysis determined that removing a vehicle travel lane on Dublin Boulevard would delay transit service and worsen traffic during peak periods.
Community members and local business owners expressed concern for this potential barrier to visiting Downtown Dublin via car. Ultimately, a shared‐use path running alongside Dublin Boulevard and 573
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
connecting to the Alamo Canal Trail became the long‐term vision for bicycling. In the interim, sharrows (a Class III facility) were added to Dublin Boulevard between Dublin Court and Tassajara Road, and the City permitted riding bicycles on sidewalks to make riding a more comfortable experience for all bicyclists’ skill levels.
Pedestrian Safety Assessment (2014)
The UC Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies Technology Transfer Program prepared this Assessment for the City of Dublin in 2014. The authors compared different types of collisions that occurred in Dublin with other cities in California; they found that Dublin has a relatively high number of collisions involving pedestrians, particularly youth and elderly pedestrians, and collisions involving high vehicle speeds. Opportunity areas to improve walking conditions in Dublin include traffic calming programs, transportation demand management policies and programs, coordination with health agencies to promote walking and biking, and more. This Assessment also includes specific areas of Dublin where pedestrian conditions could significantly benefit from improvements, which will be reviewed in this Plan.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2014)
Adopted in 2014, Dublin’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2014 Plan) established key goals and policiesto maintain and improve biking and walking infrastructure. Goals and policiessupport the 2014 Plan’s Vision for Dublin:
The purpose of the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is to provide a policy and implementation framework for maintaining and improving bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in the City. This Plan envisions a network of safe, comfortable, and attractive facilities that meet the needs of users of all ages and abilities and connect users with key destinations—schools, residential neighborhoods, parks, shopping areas, and job centers—within the City and in adjacent jurisdictions.
An inventory of the bicycle and pedestrian network and potential improvements to specific facilities are documented. Infrastructure projects at key locations are organized by priority into four tiers and are intended to actualize the proposed biking and walking network. Programming opportunities to attract biking and walking trips are also identified in the 2014 Plan. In addition to providing an inventory of potential funding sources for project implementation, the 2014 Plan includes bicycle and pedestrian design guidelines that apply national resources and best practices to project implementation in Dublin.
General Plan Land Use & Circulation: Circulation & Scenic Highways Element and Schools, Public Lands, & Utilities Element (2014)
The General Plan’s Land Use & Circulation Elementsfocus on meeting the mobility needs of all roadway users by any mode and aligns with two key documents, the City of Dublin’s Complete Streets Policy (City Council Resolution 199‐12) and the Tri‐Valley Transportation Plan (a regional plan). The Element promotes the use of local and regional trails and emphasize improving experiences walking and taking 574
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
transit. The Elements name two areas, the Eastern Extended Planning Area and Downtown Dublin, where active transportation investments are a priority.
The Elements’ Guiding Policies that are the most relevant to this Plan include:
5.3.1.A.3 Encourage improvements in the Enhanced Pedestrian Areas to improve the walkability of these areas.
5.5.1.A.1 Provide safe, continuous, comfortable and convenient bikeways throughout the City.
5.5.1.A.2 Improve and maintain bikeways and pedestrian facilities and support facilities in conformance with the recommendations in the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
5.5.1.A.3 Enhance the multi‐modal circulation network to better accommodate alternative transportation choices including BART, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian transportation.
5.5.1.A.4 Provide comfortable, safe, and convenient walking routes throughout the City and, in particular, to key destinations such as Downtown Dublin, the BART Stations, schools, parks, and commercial centers.
Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2015)
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan establishes goals, standards, guiding policies, and action programs to guide the City in the acquisition, development and management (operations and maintenance) of parks and recreation facilities. Goals and guiding policies and actions identified in the plan encourage creation of a continuous network of linear parks, paths, walks, and trails to enable travel by non‐motorized modes. The standards and criteria for the City’s parks and recreation facilities include requirements for bicycle parking, paving, and right‐of‐way width.
Iron Horse Regional Trail Feasibility Study (2017)
Based on a multimodal assessment and community outreach processes, this Feasibility Study arrives at several key preferred alternativesfor the Iron Horse Regional Trail and its crossings on Dougherty Road, Dublin Boulevard, and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. A multi‐use trail separating people walking and biking was preferred; a bicycle/pedestrian bridge was preferred for crossing Dublin Boulevard, while an at‐grade crossing was preferred for Dougherty Road. Improvements near the BART station are intended to both enhance access to transit and improve experiences for trail users passing through the station area. Improvements to the Iron Horse Regional Trail contribute to this Plan by making use of the Trail easier and more convenient.
575
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Traffic Safety Study Update (2018)
Collisions were studied in the 2018 Traffic Safety Study Update (Update) to evaluate safety performance on specific street sections and intersections. Overall, collisions had recently increased at the time of this Update, but there were also more people living and driving in Dublin, particularly East Dublin. Based on recent collision history, certain street sections and intersections merited improvements, such as continuous bicycle lanes at Central Avenue and Tassajara Road. The collision analysis included in this Plan supplements the findings and recommendations of the Update.
Climate Action Plan (2020)
The Climate Action Plan (CAP), Climate Action Plan 2030 and Beyond, establishes the City’s vision for reducing greenhouse gas(GHG) emissions by 2045. The CAP namestransportation asthe largestsource of emissions in Dublin and lays a plan for Dublin to become carbon neutral by 2045. Zero‐emission vehicles and mode shift to biking, walking, and transit trips are key strategies to reduce Dublin’s GHG emissions and meet citywide targets. The CAP sets measures to develop plans and programs around transportation demand management, transit‐oriented development, parking management, and electric vehicle infrastructure planning to support mode shift and electrification of the Dublin’s vehicle fleet. As stated in the CAP, a shift to alternative, active, shared, and electric mobility will provide safer routes between home, transit stops, and other community amenities, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce traffic congestion, improve public health outcomes, and have economic benefits.
Downtown Streetscape Master Plan (2020)
The Downtown Streetscape Master Plan provides direction for public and private investment, specifically in regard to the development of the public realm and Downtown’s identity. One of the plan’s key goals is to develop pedestrian‐oriented environments on Commercial Throughways and on Downtown Local Streets. On these roadways as well as on Crosstown Boulevards and Parkways, the plan also emphasizes providing safe and comfortable facilities and crossings for people walking and biking. Recommended improvements to Downtown are prioritized into four tiers that can be matched to projectscale, budget, funding source, and other opportunities. Tier 1 and Tier 2 street and pedestrian enhancements are illustrated on Figure 3 and Figure 4 and include restriping/road diet evaluation, sidewalk expansion, intersection and mid‐block crossing treatments, as well as art and wayfinding opportunities. Notable guidelines include expanding sidewalks to provide a minimum 12‐foot sidewalk with minimum five‐ to six‐foot clear throughway zone for walking.
Specific Plans
Four areas of Dublin have specific plans that outline guiding principles, policies, and design guidance related to active transportation: Dublin Crossing, Downtown, the Dublin Village Historic Area, and Eastern Dublin.
576
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Dublin Crossing (2013)
This Specific Plan focuses on improving east‐west connectivity in the Dublin Crossing, particularly between transit stops, destinations, and trails. A relevant guiding principle in this Specific Plan is to make it easier and more convenient for people to access and use the Iron Horse Regional Trail, the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, and retail destinations without a car.
Downtown Specific Plan (2014)
Guiding principles pertinent to biking and walking in Downtown aim to create pedestrian‐friendly streets, pedestrians, and bicyclists, enhance multimodal travel options, and cultivate pedestrian connections to retail destinations. Transit‐oriented development and lighting should be scaled to people walking in Downtown. Pedestrian connectivity between buildings, parking, and sidewalks should be maintained throughout Downtown, and pedestrian amenities like street furniture are encouraged.
Dublin Village Historic Area (2014)
Placemaking, creating a positive experience for people walking, and attracting people to this area are key goals of this Specific Plan. Creating positive experiencesfor people walking includes providing more crosswalks and median refuges, calming vehicle traffic, adding pedestrian amenities or a plaza, and implementing pedestrian‐scale lighting and wayfinding.
Eastern Dublin (2016)
A key goal in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is to reduce reliance on single‐occupancy vehicles by planning the area’s land uses to naturally promote walking, biking, taking transit, and ridesharing.
Notably, development with a higher intensity is encouraged near transit corridors in Eastern Dublin.
Relevant policies in this Specific Plan include:
Providing sidewalks in the Town Center and Village Center Requiring development to balance pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile circulation Creating a north‐south trail along Tassajara Creek and other streams Establishing a bike network that meets both travel needs and recreational opportunities Providing bicycle parking at key destinations
BENCHMARKING INTERVIEWS SUMMARY
Benchmarking interviews were conducted virtually with representatives ofseven City departments and the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD) in April and May 2020. The purpose of the benchmarking interviews is to understand each relevant City department and DUSD’s active transportation policies, programs, and needs that both support and can be supported by the Plan. Points of emphasis from the interviews will inform the Plan’s recommendations and are described and summarized in this section. 577
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Interviewees’ complete responses can be found in the Appendix. Interviews were conducted with the following City departments and DUSD:
Traffic
Economic Development
Community Development
Fire
Police
Maintenance
Parks and Community Services
Emphasis areas emerged as either a theme across multiple interviews or as single points of discussion that are particularly relevant to biking and walking in Dublin. Recommendations draw upon these emphasis areas within the framework of the City’s existing policies and plans, as detailed in the previous section of this memo. Policy and program recommendations are intended to act as a starting point for the Plan, and they may be updated and refined as technical analyses and community engagement processes continue.
Emphasis areas, specific topics of each emphasis area, and draft recommendations (where applicable) are described in Table 2.
578
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 1, 2022 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Table 2: Benchmarking Interview Themes Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
Desire for stronger policies
2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and
Design Guidelines
Back the design guidelines with policy to
require adherence to the Guidelines
Consider approving the Plan in the form of
a City resolution or ordinance
Implement amendments to the Municipal
Code to require priority design elements as
part of development project
implementation.
Standard plans for new development
Update design standards to include bicycle
and pedestrian‐friendly standards, such as
smaller driveway turning radii
Unclear bicycle and pedestrian improvement
processes
Craft a policy, or accompanying tool, that
provides clear direction for
bicycle/pedestrian project implementation
Create a priority project list of identified
improvements that can be applied to
development projects as community
benefits.
Tension with General Plan policies
Consider modifying policies in the General
Plan Circulation Element that facilitate
auto‐centric development or standards
Vision Zero
Consider implementing a Vision Zero policy
in Dublin
579
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
Unclear bicycle and pedestrian project
implementation processes
Coordinating with proposed development
projects
Establish clear development standards and
implementation requirements for new
development.
Coordination challenges in implementing
bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Intersection treatments for bicyclists and
pedestrians that impact vehicle operations
Establish guidance to assist decision
makers in determining design solutions
when tradeoffs are involved
Filling gaps in the bicycle and pedestrian
network with developers’ improvements
Coordinate development review processes
with the implementation plan for the
proposed bicycle and pedestrian network
City’s plans concurrently in development
Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian
improvements into the City’s ongoing
plans, such as the Downtown Streetscape
Master Plan, to identify and secure various
funding sources for bicycle/pedestrian
projects
Communication with developers and business
owners
Consider implementing a transportation
demand management program. Conduct a
travel survey focused on walking, biking,
and transportation demand management
to Dublin’s business community. Develop
and continually update a spatial database
of bicycle and pedestrian counts.
Regional coordination
Consider coordinating bicycle andpedestrian improvement projects through regional channels, particularly in the Tri‐
Valley area, that already exist due to
580
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
enforcement needs and economic
development opportunities
Staffing needs Coordinating and implementing bicycle and pedestrian projects Hire at least one full time dedicated staff
person (per 100,000 population) to meet
the League of American Bicyclist’s Bronze
Standard
School crossing guards and traffic enforcement
near schools
Consider hiring more sworn or unsworn
police officers to enforce road rules near
schools
Emergency response vehicle needs
Vertical deflection in bicycle facilities
Design speed tables and Class IV bicycle
facilities with the Fire Department for
application in Downtown Dublin
Speed management and traffic calming devices Develop a pre‐approved list of traffic calming devices with the Fire Department Barriers to connectivity
Freeways
Continue to coordinate with the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to
minimize negative effects of highways to
people walking and biking
Limited east‐west connectivity through
Downtown Dublin and between parks
Lacking pedestrian facilities on undeveloped
parcels
Consider paving sidewalks at key locations
to fill gaps in the pedestrian network
Incomplete intersections and trail crossings
Establish design standards for trail
crossings and for trails that run adjacent to
roadways
581
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 14
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
Consider implementing specialaccommodations (such as the East Dublin BART station and Iron Horse Trail
connection) for bicyclists at trail crossings
with the Fire Department’s approval
Non‐infrastructural barriers to biking and
walking
High vehicle volumes and speeds
Consider traffic calming, bulb‐outs, and
narrowing vehicle travel lanes to reduce
traffic stress to pedestrians and bicyclists
Identify opportunities for paseos and
shared‐use paths in Downtown to separate
vehicles from people walking and biking
Lacking wayfinding for bicyclists and
pedestrians
Include wayfinding standards and
implementation considerations (such as
cost and timeline) in the Plan
Provide guidelines for consistent visual
cues to people walking and biking in the
Plan
Safety concerns or discomfort while walking or
biking
Coordinate projects to address safety
needs at schools between DUSD, the City’s
Transportation Department, and DublinPolice
Identify locations where lighting can be
improved on Dublin’s trails
Implement transportation demand
management programs, such as BART
582
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
shuttles, that can supplement bicycle and
pedestrian infrastructure
Treat locations where people walking and
biking have conflicted with vehicles
entering or exiting driveways, such as at
the Senior Center
Unclear maintenance protocols or
responsibilities
Trail sweeping
Establish general bicycle and pedestrian
facility maintenance policies and standards
in the Plan
Bicycle facility paint
Consider developing a maintenance plan
for Dublin’s bicycle facilities, including
painting and sweeping needs
Challenges in implementing CALGreen
standards
Requesting bike showers and lockers in new
development
Provide direction in the Plan of how to
implement CALGreen standards in the
development process
Unknown bike parking and amenities
demand and needs
Bike parking implementation and long‐term
use
Consider requiring bike parking analysis
when parking studies are conducted in
Dublin
Consider focusing bike parking in areas
where there is assumed bike demand, such
as job centers, the BART stations, and
technology‐focused businesses
Craft a policy or objective to establish an
inventory of bicycle facilities, parking, and
amenities throughout Dublin, including in
583
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Emphasis Area Topic Recommendation
parks, that can also be used for
maintenance plans
Include bike parking in the Plan’s Design
Guidelines
Bike parking needs at parks and events
Install bike parking racks at parks that
complies with the Draft Parks and
Recreation Master Plan or where there is a
demonstrated need, including at
Stagecoach and at the Sports Grounds
Require temporary wayfinding signage at
events to notify attendees of bike valet
Differing speeds of people walking and
biking on a single facility
E‐bikes Develop a policy and design standards in
the Plan that address varying users’ speeds
on a single facility Multi‐use trails in parks
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2020.
584
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 1, 2022 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
PROGRAMS OVERVIEW
In the benchmarking interviews, City and DUSD staff described how several City programs support biking and walking in Dublin. Programs are also described on the City’s website and in the 2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Programs support and aim to implement the City’s policies and goals. The City’s active transportation programs are described in Table 3.
Table 3: Active Transportation Programs
Program Description Managing Department
Bicycle and
pedestrian
counts
Bicycle and pedestrian counts are included in the
City’s turning movement counts. Bike counters
collect data on the Iron Horse and Alamo Canal
Trails. Bicycle and pedestrian count data are also
provided to the City in environmental documents
and traffic studies.
Traffic and Planning
Safe Routes
to School
(SRTS)1
SRTS aims to establish routes which maximize
safety for travel to and from school sites, as well as
to educate school administrators, parents, and
children about vehicle, bike, and pedestrian safety.
DUSD with support from
Alameda CTC, several City
Departments, including
Police, Planning, and Traffic
Adult school
crossing
guards2
Crossing guards help children safely cross the
street at key locations on the way to school.
Crossing guards may help parents more
comfortably allow students to walk or bike to
school while setting an example of how to safely
cross the street.
DUSD, Police, and Traffic
Bike to Work
Day3
Bike to Work Day is a City‐sponsored activity that
encourages commuters to bike to their place of
work. The event includes energizer stations for
refreshments and giveaways. Bike to Work Day is
expected to be held on September 24, 2020.
Traffic and Environmental
Programs
Notes:
1. Source: https://dublin.ca.gov/349/Safe‐Routes‐to‐School
2. Source: http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/crossing_guard/index.cfm
3. Source: https://dublin.ca.gov/954/National‐Bike‐Month‐Activities Additional program details and needs are provided below:
585
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
A recommended action item from the 2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan not yet implemented is a GIS database of bicycle and pedestrian counts by location. The database should be continually updated as the City receives and collects new count data. The City integrates SRTS into planning processes through the City’s partnership with Alameda CTC’s Safe Routes to Schools Program (SR2S) Program.1 When development projects include a new school, the Planning Department and DUSD coordinate to evaluate connections to the school.
o There is a need to designate a staff person at DUSD and the City who are responsible for coordinating and overseeing school connectivity. This staff responsibility would ensure that school access is sufficient from the planning stage all the way through to the operation of schools.
The Transportation Department fields requests for crossing guards, and school principals determine crossing guard needs for their school. Dublin Police then hires the crossing guards and manage the program.
o A coordination protocol may be needed between DUSD and the Transportation Department to jointly identify and cross‐check crossing guard needs.
KEY NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In compiling the non‐infrastructure inventory described in this memo, several needs and recommendations became clears. These bicycle‐ and pedestrian‐related needs and recommendations are described below:
Vehicle speeds and volumes were identified in benchmarking interviews as challenges to walking and biking comfortably in Dublin. Additionally, the Pedestrian Safety Assessment (2014) recommends improve walking conditions using traffic calming programs, transportation demand management (TDM) policies and programs, and coordination with health agencies to promote walking and biking. TDM programs could be informed by surveys conducted with the business community and bicycle and pedestrian counts.
Active transportation investments in East Dublin and Downtown Dublin are considered a priority in the General Plan Land Use & Circulation Element. Biking and walking needs in these geographic areas, gaps in the walking and biking network, and safety treatments near parks, senior centers, and schools should be considered in the Plan’s prioritization framework.
Additionally, a database of bicycle and pedestrian counts would guide investments. Guided by the Plan’s updated Design Guidelines, trail crossings and complete intersections should be implemented through coordinated development processes and special accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians that the Fire Department may provide. Notably, 1 Alameda CTC administers the Alameda County SR2S Program, which also includes the International Walk and Roll to School Day as part of its programming.
586
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Inventory of Existing Programs and Policies (Draft) Project #: 24392 June 5, 2020 Page 19
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
crossing conditions on the Iron Horse Regional Trail can be improved at Dublin Boulevard, Dougherty Road, and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. Driveways were identified as a potential point of conflict for bicyclists and pedestrians, and radii should be modified to both enhance the safety of people walking and biking and accommodate emergency response vehicles. Additionally, road safety treatments are identified in the Plan’s collision analysis.
East‐west connectivity, particularly through Downtown and to the City’s parks, was emphasized as a need in benchmarking interviews. The Dublin Crossing Specific Plan (2013) also identifies this need, particularly between transit stops, destinations, and trails. Promoting and facilitating biking and walking to local destinationsis a need in Dublin, according to benchmarking interviews, several specific plans, and the draft CAP (2020). A travel survey with the business community could provide additional insight as to how to make biking and walking an appealing option for more residents, commuters, and visitors. Improved coordination and clearer work processes to implement bicycle and pedestrian projects are needed to upgrade and expand the bicycle and pedestrian network, establish maintenance plans and ongoing infrastructure needs, and maximize both local and regional resources.
Next Steps
Upon receiving comments from the City, Kittelson will revise and finalize this non‐infrastructure inventory, which will then be used as the basis for program and policy recommendations in the Plan.
Kittelson will prepare cost estimates and an implementation plan for recommended policies and programs and will work with the City to identify which, if any, of the recommendations could be further developed within the Plan.
587
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
EXISTING
CONDITIONS:
DEMOGRAPHIC
ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B
588
FILENAME: H:\24\24392 - DUBLIN ATP\TASK 3 - BASELINE CONDITIONS & NEEDS ASSESSMENT\3.3.1 DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS\MEMO\FINAL - TO CLIENT 6-22-2020\24392_DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS MEMO_20200622.DOCX
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 22, 2020 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
City of Dublin
From: Amanda Leahy, AICP, Mike Alston, RSP, Quinn Wallace, Erin Ferguson, PE, RSP Project: Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Subject: Demographic Analysis
The City of Dublin (City) is updating the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Plan). The Plan will serve as a comprehensive action plan for the City to provide improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities for its residents, employees, and visitors. As part of the baseline conditions and needs assessment, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) gathered and summarized demographic data. The findings of this demographic analysis will inform the Plan’s bicycle and pedestrian demand analysis.
After completing the baseline conditions and needs assessment, this analysis may be used in prioritizing the Plan’s projects, identifying project and program recommendations, and developing an implementation plan.
This memorandum (memo) details the methodology, maps, tables, and charts produced to analyze Dublin’s demographics. Charts, tables, and graphs provide additional context by comparing key Dublin demographics to the same statistics across Alameda County. The memo is organized into the following sections:
• Methodology
• Map Packages
o Population – Race/Ethnicity and Age
o Workers – Travel Modes and Times
o Households – Income, Vehicles, and Health
• Comparison of City of Dublin to Alameda County
• Next Steps
Maps included in each of the map packages are as follows:
• Population – Race/Ethnicity and Age
o Total Population of Block Groups
o Total Population of Transportation Analysis Zones
589
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
o Minority Race/Ethnicity Population
o Population Under Age 18
o Population Ages 65 and Older
• Workers – Travel Modes and Times
o Number of Workers per Block Group
o Commuters by Public Transportation
o Pedestrian Commuters
o Commuters by Bicycle
o Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes
• Households – Income, Vehicles, and Health
o Number of Households per Block Group
o Number of Households per Transportation Analysis Zone o Household Income Under 25% of City Median Income
o Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income
o Household Income 50% - 100% of City Median Income
o Household Income 100% + of City Median Income
o Zero Car Households
o CalEnviroScreen
METHODOLOGY
Data sets from the U.S. Census the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) were used in this analysis. The CalEnviroScreen is generated by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and maps disadvantaged areas statewide based on a number of indicators generated from socioeconomic and environmental health data. Those data include pollution exposure, environmental effect, sensitive population, and socioeconomic indicators.
The CalEnviroScreen tool produces an overall score for each census tract and compares the results as percentiles across all of California. Communities within the top 25th percentile statewide are considered disadvantages communities under the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Active Transportation Program grant guidelines.
CalEnviroScreen data is summarized at the Census tract level, while all other Census data sets are summarized at the block group level (i.e., more granular). CalEnviroScreen indicators fall into four broad groups—exposures, environmental effects, sensitive populations, and socioeconomic factors. In Dublin, there are 10 tracts containing 19 block groups. Block groups are shown in the Total Population of Block Groups, Number of Workers per Block Group, and Number of Households per Block Group maps. Census data variables were grouped into categories that show the relevant demographic trends in Dublin. The block groups are described in more detail below.
Demographic data primarily came from the Census’s American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5- Year Estimates. Variables from these data sets include:
590
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
• Age
• Race and ethnicity
• Household income
• Commute mode
• Commute time
• Vehicles per household
In addition to using data sets from the American Community Survey (ACS), data was obtained from the Census's Longitudinal Employer-Household Data (LEHD) dataset. 1 The analysis related to jobs was
conducted on primary jobs, which includes the highest paying job per individual worker (one person per job). This includes both public and private sector jobs.
Census Block Group Data
Because block groups do not coincide with municipal boundaries, some judgment is required when determining which block groups to include in Dublin analysis for two reasons:
1. Block groups abutting the City boundaries but not fully contained within Dublin must either be included or excluded. Block group 4505022 on the western boundary and block groups 4507521 and 4507511 on the eastern boundary include substantial land area outside City boundaries, but all or most of the population in each case is within City boundaries (based on the distribution of development). Therefore, all three are included in analysis.
2. Block groups may include land and/or population which this plan will have no ability to impact.
Two such block groups are block group 4501022, which exclusively includes the Santa Rita County Jail, and block group 4501021, which includes the Camp Parks US Army facility but also includes land developed separately (including the Dublin Crossing development). Camp Parks land is owned and planned by the federal government and is outside the City’s planning jurisdiction. The area is generally excluded from the realm of this Plan.
Data for block group 4501022 will be excluded from analysis, given that the population’s movements and mobility needs are limited to the jail site. Workers within this census block group are identified in the ACS based on their place of residence. A discussion of the populations contained within the 4501021 block group informs whether to retain its data in the analysis. A discussion of the population distribution is included in the next section.
Comparison to Travel Demand Model
As previously mentioned, this demographic analysis forms the basis for forthcoming demand analysis, prioritization, and project and program recommendations. The variables explored in this analysis will 1 LEHD data is available online at http://onthemap.ces.census.gov/. 591
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
allow the City to spatially prioritize with sociodemographic factors. These demographic data are available from the ACS at the block group level—approximately 19 block groups wholly or partially within City limits. The City maintains a transportation model, which provides smaller units of analysis called transportation analysis zones (TAZs). By comparison, the city is comprised of 134 TAZs. TAZs provide a more granular unit of analysis but fewer demographic variables overall. The relevant data provided by the City model (including data representing 2017) include population and household totals (2017 estimated values) which can be compared to the ACS data.
Figure 1 presents a comparison between block group and TAZ population values. TAZ population is aggregated to the block group level for comparison; where TAZs intersect multiple block groups, they are aggregated to the block group that contains their centroid. The comparison shows the values to be generally within approximately 10 percent of one another, with some differences explained by the boundaries that are not coincident.
The comparison also shows that block group 4501021 (containing Camp Parks land) has a similar population estimate with the associated TAZs, although a majority of this block group’s land is on Camp Parks land. The population accounted for in this block group primarily resides in the southern portion of the block group (outside the Camp Parks land), so the block group population is retained for this analysis. Going forward, the demand analysis and prioritization work using these data will account for the population being concentrated in the southern part of the of the block group.2 The demographic information associated with this block group will be included and carried forward in future analysis.
Figure 1 also shows several TAZs with no population—in particular, the centrally located TAZ within block group 4501022. This block group contains the Santa Rita County Jail. ACS data report a population of 900, which exclusively includes inmates (counted as group quarters population). 2 A closer inspection of available ACS data revealed that among the approximately 1,135 residents over age 16 in the block group, 18 are employed in the armed forces.
592
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
BG: 4504001, Pop: 2119
TAZs:
3, TAZ Pop: 1915
BG: 4502001, Pop: 1485
BG TAZs: 1, TAZ Pop: 1549 : 4503001, Pop: 2160
TAZs: 6, TAZ Pop: 2053
BG: 4503002, Pop: 3141
TAZs: 14, TAZ Pop: 3818
BG: 4505011, Pop: 683
TAZs: 2, TAZ Pop: 849
BG: 4502002, Pop: 2097
TAZs: 2, TAZ Pop: 2574
BG: 4502003, Pop: 2518
TAZs: 2, TAZ Pop: 1910
BG: 4501011, Pop: 5573
TAZs: 14, TAZ Pop: 9862
BG: 4501023, Pop: 3913
TAZs: 10, TAZ Pop: 5239
BG: 4501021, Pop: 1228
TAZs: 5, TAZ Pop: 907
BG: 4505012, Pop: 2447
TAZs: 8, TAZ Pop: 2544
BG: 4507501, Pop: 4842
TAZs: 10, TAZ Pop: 5790
BG: 4501022, Pop: 900
TAZs: 1, TAZ Pop: 0
BG: 4505021, Pop: 2499
TAZs: 4, TAZ Pop: 2241
BG: 4505022, Pop: 3381
TAZs: 6, TAZ Pop: 2473
BG: 4507511, Pop: 9787
TAZs: 18, TAZ Pop: 8414
BG: 4507521, Pop: 6642
TAZs: 11, TAZ Pop: 5045
BG: 4504003, Pop: 3300
TAZs:
15, TAZ Pop: 4408
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Demo Overview BG vs Census.mxd Date: 6/17/2020 Dublin TAZs
TAZs with Zero Population
Block Groups
Camp Parks (Federal Land)
Dublin City Limits
Figure 1
Census Block Groups versus City Model TAZs
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
593
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MAP PACKAGES
Maps produced in this analysis spatially present demographic data in Dublin only. Graphs, charts, and tables in this memo provide additional context and comparisons to all of incorporated and unincorporated Alameda County.
The maps are grouped into three packages:
• Population – Race/Ethnicity and Age
• Workers – Commute Modes and Times
• Households – Income, Vehicles, and Health
The group is shown first in each map series to provide an overview and is followed by maps analyzing unique variables. For example, the number of households per block group are shown first, followed by a map of household income grouping.
Population – Race/Ethnicity and Age
This map package shows proportions of racial and ethnic minorities and age groups by each block group’s population. Maps in this package include the following:
• Total Population of Block Groups
• Total Population of Transportation Analysis Zones
• Minority Race/Ethnicity Population
• Population Under Age 18
• Population Ages 65 and Older
Race/Ethnicity
In this package, the Minority Race/Ethnicity Population map shows the percent of individuals who identify within a minority race or ethnicity. To form this category, the following Census demographics were grouped together:
• Black or African American Alone
• American Indian and Alaska Native Alone
• Asian Alone
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone
• Some Other Race Alone
• Two or More Races
• Hispanic or Latino
Individuals that are white alone (not Hispanic or Latino) are excluded from this category. The Census defines Asian individuals as “a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent.” The ACS does provide subgroup estimates that better 594
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
clarify the respondents who indicate Asian alone as their race; those estimates are only available at the City level.
Within Dublin, the 26,672 Asian residents are comprised of the following groups, in descending proportional order:3
• Asian Indian: 12,627 (47% of Asian alone residents)
• Chinese, excluding Taiwanese: 7,160 (27% of Asian alone residents) • Filipino: 2,040 (8% of Asian alone residents)
• Vietnamese: 1,650 (6% of Asian alone residents)
• Korean: 1,139 (4% of Asian alone residents)
• Pakistani: 452 (2% of Asian alone residents)
• Japanese: 428 (2% of Asian alone residents)
• Taiwanese: 260 (1% of Asian alone residents)
Age
Three maps show three age groupings relative to block group populations:
• Population Under 18 to show concentrations of where children live • Population Age 65 and Older to show concentrations of where seniors live Workers – Commute Modes and Times
This map package shows proportions of key commute modes, including commutes by bicycle, walking, and public transportation, by each block group’s number of workers. Charts and tables provided in this section compare commute mode trends and findings using LEHD data. Maps in this package include the following:
• Number of Workers per Block Group
• Commuters by Public Transportation
• Pedestrian Commuters
• Commuters by Bicycle
• Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes
3 Other groups in Dublin comprising less than 1% of Asian residents include Bangladeshi, Bhutanese, Burmese, Cambodian, Hmong, Indonesian, Laotian, Malaysian, Mongolian, Nepalese, Okinawan, Sri Lankan, Thai, other unspecified, and two or more. Note that the 26,672 total is based on city-level data and varies slightly from the aggregated Census block group totals presented later in this memorandum. 595
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Commute Modes
Three maps display commute modes that are central to the Plan, including Commuters by Public Transportation, Pedestrian Commuters, and Commuters by Bicycle. Due to significant differences between block groups and relatively low percentages, the count of each commuter type per block group is shown in a bubble in addition to the percentages.
Notably, one outlier is shown in the Commuters by Bicycle map: one block group has 44 bicycle commuters, amounting to over 20% of its 166 workers. The high proportion of bicycle commuters in this block group may be attributable to the Army Base located in this block group.
On the Commuters by Public Transportation map, high proportions of transit commuters can be found not only near the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, but also where the Alamo Canal Trail and Iron Horse Trail converge. The Iron Horse Trail connects directly to the BART station and is about a 1-mile bicycle ride. Other densities of transit commuters are likely attributable to the number of workers in the block group, such as near the Martin Canyon Creek Trail.
Commute Times
A single map, Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes, shows the overall high proportions of commuters by block group with commutes over 30 minutes. On this map, commute mode is not considered, so a 30-minute walking or biking commute is classified the same as a 30-minute driving commute. This map may contextualize commute mode choices also displayed in this map package.
Dublin Workers and Commuters
For purposes of the discussion that follows, the following terms are used:
• Workers living in Dublin: This term is used to define jobholders who live in Dublin. They may work in Dublin or elsewhere.
• People working in Dublin: This term is used to define people who work in Dublin. They may live in Dublin or elsewhere.
Based on the most recent LEHD data available (2017), the net inflow and outflow of Dublin workers is the following:
• 16,042 people commute into Dublin for work and live elsewhere ( these are people working in Dublin)
• 23,161 people live in Dublin and commute elsewhere to work (these are workers living in Dublin) 1,484 people live and work in Dublin (these are in both categories above) Figure 2 presents this relationship visually.
596
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 2: Workers by Residence and Job Location
Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), 2017.
Work Destinations
Figure 3 shows that the top job locations of workers living in Dublin range from cities in Silicon Valley to neighboring jurisdictions, such as Pleasanton and San Ramon. San Francisco is the second most common job location after Pleasanton for workers living in Dublin. The home and work location provided by LEHD data are sorted into the three income groups presented.
Variation in job location exists by income; Dublin is the fourth highest job location overall, behind Pleasanton, San Francisco, and San Jose. Notably, the relative share of residents working in Dublin is lower among those who make above $40,000 per year compared to other locations. 597
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 3: Top 10 Job Locations Among Workers Living in Dublin, by Income Level Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), 2017.
10.9%
7.2%
6.6%
6.0%
5.6%
5.2% 5.0%
4.6%
3.0%
2.6%
2.3% 2.1% 2.1%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
Share of Primary Jobs among Workers Living in Dublin
Job Location
Workers making less than $15,000 per
year
Workers making between $15,000
and $40,000 per year
Workers making above $40,000 per
year
Total Primary Jobs
598
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Commute Distances
As highlighted in Figure 3, approximately 6% of workers living in Dublin work in Dublin as well. As shown in Table 1, of the 24,645 workers living in Dublin, 71% work more than 10 miles from home. Compared to the share of total workers, a higher share of the lowest income workers work within ten miles (39% compared to 29%).
Table 1: Commute Destinations Among Workers Living in Dublin (Primary Jobs) Distance
from
Home to
Work
Workers, by Income Level (Percent of Column)
Workers making
less than $15,000
per year
Workers making
between $15,000
and $40,000 per
year
Workers making
above $40,000 per
year All Workers
< 10 miles 982 (39%) 1,245 (30%) 4,815 (27%) 7,042 (29%) 10 to 24
miles 776 (31%) 1,489 (36%) 8,248 (46%) 10,513 (43%)
25 to 50
miles 366 (15%) 697 (17%) 3,604 (20%) 4,667 (19%)
>50 miles 370 (15%) 703 (17%) 1,350 (7%) 2,423 (10%)
Total
2,494
4,134
18,017
24,645
Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), 2017.
Table 2 provides the distance to home for people working in Dublin.
Table 2: Commute Origins Among People Working in Dublin (Primary Jobs) Distance
from
Home to
Work
Workers, by Income Level (Percent of Column)
Workers making
less than $15,000
per year
Workers making
between $15,000
and $40,000 per
year
Workers making
above $40,000 per
year All Workers
< 10 miles 1,004 (28%) 1,355 (26%) 2,657 (31%) 5,016 (29%) 10 to 24
miles 1,087 (30%) 1,813 (34%) 2,830 (33%) 5,730 (33%)
25 to 50
miles 721 (20%) 1,090 (21%) 1,648 (19%) 3,459 (20%)
>50 miles 835 (23%) 1,043 (20%) 1,443 (17%) 3,321 (19%) Total
3,647
5,301
8,578
17,526
Source: Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), 2017. 599
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
The plurality of people who commute to Dublin from elsewhere travel 10 to 24 miles into work (approximately 33%). As shown in Table 2, the distances traveled leaving Dublin for work are generally higher than the distances traveled into Dublin for work.
Households – Income, Vehicles, and Health
This map package shows proportions of key household metrics by each block group’s number of households. Maps in this package include:
• Number of Households per Block Group
• Household Income Under 25% of City Median Income
• Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income
• Household Income 50% - 100% of City Median Income
• Household Income 100% + of City Median Income
• Zero Car Households
• CalEnviroScreen
Income
The city’s median income is used as the basis for comparing household incomes in Dublin. The city’s median household income is $146,208.4 The closest Census income level to Dublin’s median household income is $150,000. Four household income groups were created to identify any concentrations of household incomes and any differences in access to key land uses by household incomes. The income groupings used on the maps are described below:
• Household Income Under 25% of City Median Income shows households with incomes between $0 and $35,000.
• Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income shows households with incomes between $35,000 and $75,000.
• Household Income 50% - 100% of City Median Income shows households with incomes between $75,000 and $150,000.
• Household Income 100%+ of City Median Income shows households with incomes at and above $150,000.
On the Household Income Under 25% of City Median Income map, a concentration of households earning less than $35,000 per year may be attributable to the Army Base located in this block group.
This concentration also correlates with the number of bicycle and transit commuters in this block group, as shown in the Commuters by Bicycle and Commuters by Public Transportation maps. 4 Source: City of Dublin Demographics. Retrieved from: https://www.dublin.ca.gov/1811/Demographics 600
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Another concentration shown in the Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income map is located adjacent to the Martin Canyon Creek Trail. Notably, this block group also has a high proportion of transit commuters, as shown in the Commuters by Public Transportation map. This indicates an area of Dublin where income level and commute mode appear to be linked.
Similarly, high income level concentrations shown in the Household Income 100%+ of City Median Income map are linked to longer commute times. As shown in the Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes map, high proportions of workers commuting more than 30 minutes in eastern block groups of Dublin are located where high proportions of households earn above the median income.
Vehicles
Dublin’s households with zero vehicles are spatialized in the Zero Car Households map. This map is shown to indicate where individuals may rely on biking, walking, and riding public transportation as their primary modes of travel.
Health
As shown on the CalEnviroScreen map, Dublin’s scores indicate that the city is minimally, if at all, disadvantaged from a perspective of health and environment compared to other California communities.
Comparison of City of Dublin to Alameda County and East County Planning Area For consistency with the data presented at the block group level, Dublin is represented by an aggregation of constituent tracts, as shown in the Total Population of Block Groups, Number of Workers per Block Group, and Number of Households per Block Group maps. This aggregation may include some people and households not within city limits. However, a comparison of the aggregated Census block totals compared to the Dublin City geography shows the population totals to be within 2 percent of one another.
Generally, people of color, particularly Black/African American and Hispanic or Latino groups, are among communities that have been historically disadvantaged in access to transportation services and infrastructure. In comparing racial and ethnicity statistics with Alameda County, this demographic analysis has not found that this trend is prevalent in Dublin. Like Alameda County, Dublin has an approximately 40%-60% split of Non-White Combined populations and white alone populations.
Significant differences between Alameda County and Dublin are in the Black/African American Alone and Asian Alone populations. Indian (12,627) and Chinese Except Taiwanese (7,160) groups make up the majority of Dublin’s Asian Alone (26,888) populations. 601
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 14
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 3: Comparison of Population Variables, Dublin and Alameda County, 2014-2018 Variable Dublin Alameda County
Total Population 59,275 1,643,700
Race
White Alone 25,172 (42%) 681,725 (41%)
Non-White Combined 34,103 (58%) 961,975 (59%)
Black/African American Alone 1,769 (3%) 177,135 (11%)
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone 269 (<1%) 10,712 (1%0 Asian Alone 26,831 (45%) 486,434 (30%)
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone 217 (<1%) 13,768 (1%) Some or Other Alone 1,294 (2%) 169,771 (10%)
2+ Races 3,723 (6%) 104,155 (6%)
Age
Population Under 5 Years Old 4,486 (8%) 97,506 (6%)
Population 5-14 Years Old 9,462 (16%) 192,220 (12%)
Population 15-24 Years Old 4,738 (8%) 197,570 (12%)
Population 25-44 Years Old 20,698 (35%) 516,424 (31%)
Population 45-64 Years old 14,699 (25%) 424,063 (26%)
Population 65+ Years Old 5,192 (9%) 215,917 (13%)
Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates.
For transportation-focused data, Dublin characteristics are compared to the East County Planning Area as well, as it represents a more similar comparison to the City than the County overall.5 Dublin has 8% more commuters who drive alone to work compared to Alameda County as a whole, as also shown by the lower percentages of commuters who bike, walk, or take transit to work. The commute mode in Dublin is more aligned with mode share of commuter in the East Planning Area of the County. In Dublin, 4% fewer commuters drive alone relative to the East Planning Area, and the 4% more commuters take transit.
5 The East County Planning area includes Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, and unincorporated county area east of Hayward and Fremont. More information and the areas can be found in the Countywide Active Transportation Plan at https://www.alamedactc.org/planning/countywide-bicycle-and-pedestrian-plans/. 602
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 4: Comparison of Worker Variables, Dublin and Alameda County, 2014-2018 Variable Dublin
Alameda County –
East Planning Area Alameda County
Total Workers Age 16+ 29,874 118,263 767,292
Commute Mode
Car/Truck/Van – Drove
Alone 20,544 (69%)
86,523 (73%) 471,802 (61%)
Car/Truck/Van –
Carpooled 2,829 (9%)
9,923 (8%) 75,493 (10%)
Public Transit (including
Taxicab) 4,004 (13%) 10,136 (9%) 115,383 (15%)
Motorcycle 35 (<1%) 343 (<1%) 2,994 (<1%)
Bicycle 116 (<1%) 987 (1%) 15,132 (2%)
Walked 343 (1%) 1,890 (2%) 28,513 (4%)
Other Means 136 (<1%) 712 (1%) 8,603 (1%)
Worked at Home 1,902 (6%) 7,749 (7%) 48,111 (6%)
Commute Time, not working from home
Travel Time < 30
minutes 12,362 (44%) 55,270 (50%) 339,680 (47%)
Travel Time ≥ 30
minutes 15,610 (56%) 55,244 (50%) 379,501 (53%)
Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates.
When compared with Alameda County, Dublin has a lower proportion of households without vehicles.
The percentage of households, 3% is similar to that in the East Planning Area of Alameda County, 4%.
Table 5: Comparison of Zero-Vehicle Households, Dublin and Alameda County, 2014-2018 Variable Dublin
Alameda County –
East Planning Area
Alameda County
Total Households 19,950 81,152 572,870
Vehicle Access
Zero-Car Households 665 (3%) 3,051 (4%) 54,816 (10%)
Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates.
When compared with Alameda County, Dublin has relatively high proportions of English-proficient households (that are not English only) and Spanish-speaking households with limited English 603
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
proficiency. Additionally, Dublin’s proportion of zero-car households is 7% lower than Alameda County’s proportion of zero-car households.
Table 6: Comparison of Household Variables, Dublin and Alameda County, 2014-2018 Variable Dublin Alameda County
Total Households 19,950 572,870
Home Language
English Only 10,051 (50%) 314,017 (55%)
Other Language (English-proficient)
Household 8,297 (42%) 205,763 (36%)
Limited English Proficiency Household 1,602 (8%) 53,090 (9%) Spanish 195 (8%) 16,454 (3%)
Other Indo-European Language 207 (1%) 4,453 (1%)
Asian/Pacific Islander 1,124 (6%) 30,082 (5%)
Other Language 76 (<1%) 2,101 (<1%)
Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates. 604
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
SUMMARY AND NEXT STEPS
Key takeaways of this demographic analysis are described below:
• Land uses and accessible bicycle and pedestrian facilities likely influence the number of commuters who choose to bike, walk, or take transit, such as the high proportion of bicycle commuters in the Army Base’s block group.
• Correlations are present in Dublin between commuters’ travel times and household incomes.
High-income households and commuters with travel times longer than 30 minutes are concentrated in the city’s eastern block groups. Additionally, high proportions of jobs paying over $40,000 per year are located in San Francisco and San Jose, which likely require commute times longer than 30 minutes. While Pleasanton has the highest proportion of total primary job locations and locations where workers making above $40,000 per year, Dublin has one of the lowest proportions of job locations where workers make above $40,000 per year. • Commuting distances for residents who leave Dublin for work are generally higher than the distances that workers travel into Dublin for work. Mode switch may be more feasible for people commuting to Dublin for work than vice versa.
• Several key demographic differences, including zero-car households and multi-lingual households, exist between Dublin and Alameda County. These differences may signify why people bike and walk in Dublin and how they access information regarding active transportation infrastructure and services.
The findings of this demographic analysis will inform the demand analysis, which will also be completed as part of the Plan’s baseline conditions and needs assessment. The demand analysis will use the age data to develop walking and biking typologies among the Dublin population. After completing the baseline conditions and needs assessment, this analysis may be used in prioritizing the Plan’s projects, identifying project and program recommendations, and developing an implementation plan. For project prioritization specifically, the data presented here provide an opportunity for the City to prioritize subgroups of its population based on indicators of relative transportation burden (e.g., presence zero-car households).
605
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MAP PACKAGE
POPULATION – RACE/ETHNICITY AND AGE
606
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Block Group:
4504001
Population:
2,119
Block Group:
4502001
Population:
1,485
Block Group:
4503001
Population:
2,160
Block Group: 4503002
Population: 3,141
Block Group:
4505011
Population: 683
Block Group:
4502002
Population:
2,097
Block Group:
4502003
Population:
2,518
Block Group: 4501011
Population: 5,573
Block Group:
4501023
Population:
3,913
Block Group: 4501021
Population: 1,228
Block Group:
4505012
Population:
2,447
Block Group:
4507501
Population:
4,842
Block Group: 4505021
Population: 2,499
Block Group: 4505022
Population: 3,381
Block Group: 4507511
Population: 9,787
Block Group: 4507521
Population: 6,642
Block Group:
4504002
Population:
1,460
Block Group:
4504003
Population:
3,300
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Overview Total Population of Block Groups.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Block Groups
Dublin City Limits
Total Population of Block Groups
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
607
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo TAZ Population.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Population Count by TAZ
3 - 323
324 - 495
496 - 632
633 - 1,030
1031 - 4,347
Dublin City Limits
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Population by TAZ
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
608
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Minority Population.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Minority Race/Ethnicity
Population by Block Group
<40%
40% - 50%
51% - 60%
61% - 70%
>70%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Minority Race/Ethnicity Population
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
609
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Population Under 18.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage Under Age 18 by Block
Group
<10%
10% - 15%
16% - 20%
21% - 25%
>25%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Population Under Age 18
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
610
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Population 65 and Older.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Age 65 and Older by
Block Group
0% - 1%
2% - 5%
6% - 10%
11% - 15%
16% - 18%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Population Ages 65 and Older
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
611
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 19
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MAP PACKAGE
WORKERS – COMMUTE MODES AND TIMES
612
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
Block Group:
4504001
Workers:
1,024
Block Group:
4502001
Workers: 890
Block Group:
4503001
Workers:
1,074
Block Group:
4503002
Workers:
1,745
Block Group:
4505011
Workers: 295
Block Group:
4502002
Workers: 1,171
Block Group:
4502003
Workers:
1,398
Block Group:
4501011
Workers: 3,026
Block Group:
4501023
Workers:
1,898
Block Group: 4501021
Workers: 166
Block Group:
4505012
Workers: 1,344
Block Group:
4507501
Workers:
2,747
Block Group:
4505021
Workers: 1,305
Block Group:
4505022
Workers: 1,660
Block Group:
4507511
Workers: 4,429
Block Group:
4507521
Workers: 3,311
Block Group:
4504002
Workers: 707
Block Group:
4504003
Workers: 1,684
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Overview Number of Workers per Block Group.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Block Groups
Dublin City Limits
Number of Workers per Block Group
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
613
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
!25
!95
!80
!50 !185
!34
!235
!636
!371
!0
!187
!413
!95
!217
!678
!458
!39
!171
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Commuters by Public Transportation.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Transit Commuters
by Block Group
<5%
5% - 10%
11% - 15%
16% - 20%
>20%
! Transit Commuters per Block Group
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Commuters by Public Transportation
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
##
614
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
!0
!0
!33
!0
!0
!0
!0
!104
!77 !42
!0
!9
!0
!0
!15
!0
!43
!20
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Commuters by Ped.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Pedestrian
Commuters by Block Group
0%
0.01%
0.02% - 0.05%
0.06% - 0.1%
0.11% - 0.25%
! Ped Commuters per Block Group
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under
Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under
Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under
Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Pedestrian Commuters
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
##
615
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
!0
!0
!0
!28
!0
!0
!16
!16
!12
!44
!0
!0
!0
!0
!0
!0
!0
!0
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Commuters by Bicycle.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Bicycle Commuters
by Block Group
0%
0.01% - 0.5%
0.51% - 1%
1.01% - 2%
>2%
! Bike Commuters per Block Group
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Commuters by Bicycle
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
##
616
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Commuter Travel Times
Greater than 30 Minutes by Block Group
<1%
1% - 10%
10.1% - 25%
25.1% - 50%
>50%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Commuter Travel Times Greater than 30 Minutes
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
617
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 20
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MAP PACKAGE
HOUSEHOLDS – INCOME, VEHICLES, AND HEALTH
618
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BLSTERLING RD
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
Block Group:
4504001
Households: 705
Block Group:
4502001
Households: 581
Block Group:
4503001
Households: 681
Block Group: 4503002
Households: 1,133
Block Group:
4505011
Households: 240
Block Group:
4502002
Households: 933
Block Group:
4502003
Households:
1,028
Block Group: 4501011
Households: 2,094
Block Group:
4501023
Households:
1,240
Block Group:
4501021
Households: 91
Block Group:
4505012
Households: 987
Block Group:
4507501
Households:
2,027
Block Group:
4505021
Households: 837
Block Group: 4505022
Households: 1,076
Block Group: 4507511
Households: 2,736
Block Group: 4507521
Households: 1,880
Block Group:
4504002
Households: 486
Block Group:
4504003
Households: 1,195
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Overview Number of Households per Block Group.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Block Groups
Dublin City Limits
Number of Households per Block Group
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
619
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo TAZ Households.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Household Count by TAZ
1 - 94
95 - 168
169 - 210
211 - 337
338 - 977
Dublin City Limits
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Households by TAZ
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
620
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Household Income Under 25 Percent.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Households Earning
Under $35K by Block Group
<5%
5% - 10%
11% - 12%
13% - 20%
>20%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Household Income Under 25% of City Median Income
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
621
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Households Earning
$35K - $75K by Block Group
5%
6% - 10%
11% - 15%
16% - 20%
>20%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Household Income 25% - 50% of City Median Income
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
622
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Household Income 50% - 100% of City Median Income.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Households Earning
$75K - $150K by Block Group
<20%
20% - 30%
31% - 40%
41% - 50%
>50%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Household Income 50% - 100% of City Median Income
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
623
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Household Income 100%+ of City Median Income.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Households Earning
$150K or more by Block Group
<25%
25% - 35%
36% - 45%
46% - 55%
>55%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Household Income 100%+ of City Median Income
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
624
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\XX Demo Zero Car Households.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 Percentage of Households with Zero
Vehicles by Block Group
<0.5%
0.5% - 2%
2.1% - 4%
4.1% - 6%
>6%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Zero Car Households
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
625
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton Alameda Livermore
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\XX Demo CalEnviroScreen.mxd Date: 6/19/2020 CalEnviroScreen
1 - 10% (Least Disadvantaged)
11 - 20%
21 - 30%
31 - 40%
Key Land Uses
Schools
Parks
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
CalEnviroScreen
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
626
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
EXISTING
CONDITIONS:
COLLISION
ANALYSIS & HIGH
INJURY NETWORK
APPENDIX B
627
FILENAME: H:\24\24392 - DUBLIN ATP\TASK 3 - BASELINE CONDITIONS & NEEDS ASSESSMENT\3.3.2 COLLISION ANALYSIS\MEMO\FINAL - TO CLIENT 6-22-2020\24392_COLLISION ANALYSIS MEMO 20200622.DOCX
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 22, 2020 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
City of Dublin
From: Amanda Leahy, AICP; Mike Alston, RSP; Michael Sahimi, AICP; Erin Ferguson, PE, RSP Project: Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Subject: Task 3.3.2 Safety Analysis – Trends and High Injury Network Mapping Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) is assisting the City of Dublin (City) to update the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Plan). This memorandum documents the methodology used for identifying the City’s draft high injury network (HIN) as part of Task 3.3.2 - Safety Analysis. It is organized into the following sections:
▪ Data Sources
▪ Scope of Analysis and Approach to Analysis
▪ Citywide Collision Trends
▪ High Injury Network Maps
This analysis is intended to identify exclusively collision history and trends. The results of this analysis will serve as an input to the forthcoming prioritization framework (Task 4.1) and network recommendations (Task 4.2). Related information, like the presence of schools or vulnerable populations, will be layered alongside this quantitative analysis in the prioritization work.
DATA SOURCES
Kittelson obtained the six most recent years of reported collision data involving bicyclists and pedestrians from the City’s CrossRoads collision database, representing 2014 through 2019. Kittelson checked collision totals against the University of California, Berkeley, Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) database and ensured that collisions were not double-counted based on collision locations, dates, and other attributes. Kittelson also used a County of Alameda centerline file to develop the roadway network used for analysis. This network was previously reviewed by the City to confirm roadways and functional classification designations.
628
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
SCOPE OF ANALYSIS AND APPROACH TO ANALYSIS
Collisions
The analysis included pedestrian and bicycle collisions of all severity levels, in descending order of severity: fatal, severe injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain injury, and property damage only (PDO). A collision is classified based on the most severe outcome among any parties involved in the collision.
Collisions were geocoded to the subject intersections or the relevant locations along roadways based on the information provided in the collision database. Collisions within 250 feet of an intersection were spatially located to the relevant intersection, and collisions listed as occurring greater than 250 feet from an intersection (as measured from the center of the intersection) were manually moved to the distance listed from the intersection.
Street Network
The analysis evaluated collisions that occurred on public streets within the City, excluding freeway mainlines (e.g., Interstates 580 and 680) but included ramp terminal intersections of freeways.
Analysis Steps
The following steps describe the basic analysis approach to identifying the HIN.
1. Establish the HIN database (collisions and roadway network) as described above.
2. Evaluate the frequency and severity of reported collisions using Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO, also known as collision severity score) screening and sliding window methodology from the Highway Safety Manual with severity weighting consistent with the Alameda CTC Countywide Active Transportation Plan (specifics of this methodology described below).
3. Select approximately the top 10 percent of roadways based on collision severity scores to be included in the HIN.
4. Where applicable, extend gaps between portions of the identified HIN provided the roadway characteristics are uniform.
Steps 2 through 4 were conducted separately for pedestrian and bicycle collisions. 629
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Collision Severity Score
Kittelson used an equivalent property damage only (EPDO) performance measure, also known as a collision severity score, which assigns weighting factors to collisions by severity relative to property damage only (PDO) collisions. For this analysis, the following weights were assigned in concurrence with Alameda CTC:
• Fatal and severe injury collisions: 10 equivalent PDOs • Visual injury or complaint of pain (moderate and minor injury) collisions: 5 equivalent PDOs • PDO collisions: 1 equivalent PDO
The weighting factors intentionally weigh fatal and severe injuries equally to recognize that the difference between a severe injury collision versus a fatal collision are often more of a function of the individuals involved than the circumstances of the collision.
The collision severity score is calculated by multiplying each collision severity total by its associated weight and summing the results, using the following formula:
Collision Severity Score = Fatal weight * # of fatal collisions + severe injury weight * # of severe injury collisions + other visible injury weight * # of other visible injury collisions + complaint of pain injury weight * # of complaint of pain injury weight collisions + PDO collisions The collision severity score is annualized by dividing the score by the number of years (six) of collision data used in the analysis.
Resulting Network
Kittelson performed a network screening to calculate the collision severity score for half-mile sliding window segments throughout the City.
Sliding Window Methodology
As part of geocoding the collision data, Kittelson implemented a Python script in ArcGIS. This script segmented the street network into one-half (1/2) of a mile segments, incrementing the segments by one-tenth (1/10) of a mile. The collision severity score was calculated per increment of each segment as the script “slides” along each street in the network. It includes intersections as part of the analysis.
By evaluating individual road increments multiple times, the sliding window methodology minimizes inaccurate collision reporting locations and identifies the windows with the highest collision severity scores. This methodology helps to identify portions of roadways with the greatest potential for safety improvements. Kittelson aggregated the results, based on their collision severity scores and via visual inspection of the results, into continuous corridors that make up the draft HIN. This is consistent with the methodology for the analysis conducted as part of the Alameda CTC Countywide Active Transportation Plan.
630
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
COLLISION TRENDS
Alongside the spatial analysis to identify pedestrian and bicycle high injury networks, available variables in the collision data were analyzed to identify any citywide trends. Pedestrian and bicycle collisions were analyzed separately for any trends based on the following characteristics:
• Temporal characteristics (time of day, day of week, seasonal, year over year) • Lighting conditions
• Location characteristics (intersection versus segment collisions) • Primary collision factors cited by reporting officers • Age and gender of people walking and biking involved in collisions Among those categories, key findings that could support further Plan update work are included below.
Note that collisions involving people walking or biking are random and sparse; the relative size of each dataset—68 bicycle collisions and 81 pedestrian collisions over six years—limits the ability to find statistically valid trends. Nonetheless, the following trends may be indicative of conditions within the City.
Location
Table 1 and Table 2 present pedestrian and bicycle collisions based on location and severity. As with the spatial analysis, intersection collisions are defined as those reported to have occurred within a 250- foot intersection influence area; all others are considered segment collisions. A majority of both pedestrian and bicycle collisions occurred at intersections, where there are more conflicts with motor vehicle traffic than at other locations along roadways.
Table 1: Pedestrian Collisions by Location and Severity Location
Fatal/Severe Injury
Collisions
Other
Collisions
Total Reported
Collisions
Share of
Total
Reported
Intersection 11 63 74 91%
Segment 1 6 7 9%
Total Reported 12 69 81 100%
Source: City of Dublin; Kittelson, 2020.
631
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 2: Bicycle Collisions by Location and Severity
Location
Fatal/Severe Injury
Collisions
Other
Collisions
Total Reported
Collisions
Share of
Total
Reported
Intersection 2 50 52 76%
Segment 1 15 16 24%
Total Reported 3 65 68 100%
Source: City of Dublin; Kittelson, 2020.
Lighting
Figure 1 presents pedestrian and bicycle collisions by lighting conditions. The majority of such collisions occurred in daylight conditions. All reported bicycle fatal and severe injury collisions occurred in daylight conditions. In dark conditions, collisions primarily occurred under street lights.
Figure 1: Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions by Lighting Conditions Source: City of Dublin; Kittelson, 2020.
78%
14%
8%
1%
81%
13%
4% 1%
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
Daylight Dark - Street Lights Dusk - Dawn Dark - No Street Lights
Dark - Street Lights
Not Functioning
Collision Frequency
Lighting Conditions
Pedestrian
Collisions
Bicycle Collisions
632
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Primary Collision Factors
Primary collision factors (PCFs) are aggregated and provided in the data based on the section of the California Vehicle Code the reporting officer records. Among bicycle collisions, the following primary collision factors were the most frequently cited:
• Automobile right of way violation (26% of collisions): a reported PCF that indicates one of several California Vehicle Violation codes regarding a failure to yield right-of-way to oncoming traffic. This PCF may be an action on the part of the bicyclist or the motorist involved. • Improper turning (16% of collisions): a reported PCF that indicates a motorist committed a hazardous violation while turning.
• Other hazardous movement (12% of collisions): This is an aggregated violation category that can indicate a hazardous movement on the part of the bicyclist or the motorist involved.
Among pedestrian collisions, the following PCFs were most frequently cited:
• Pedestrian right-of-way violation (27% of collisions): a reported PCF that indicates a driver violated a pedestrian’s right-of-way.
• Other improper driving (20% of collisions): a PCF that represents an aggregation of motorist violations.
• Automobile right-of-way violation (14% of collisions): a reported PCF that indicates one of several California Vehicle Violation codes regarding a failure to yield right-of-way to oncoming traffic. This PCF would be an action on the part of the pedestrian or the motorist involved. • Pedestrian violation (6% of collisions): a reported PCF that indicates a pedestrian was determined to have violated the laws regarding right-of-way.
Age and Gender of Parties Involved
Figure 2 presents the ages of people walking or biking involved in collisions compared to the share of the City’s population. Note that age data was available for 76% of pedestrians and for 63% of bicyclists involved in collisions. The comparison reveals that people between 15 to 24 years old appear overrepresented in bicycle and pedestrian collisions. They represent 25% and 18% of pedestrians and bicyclists involved in collisions, compared to eight percent of the City’s population. Similarly, people between 45 and 64 years old are underrepresented among pedestrian and bicyclist collisions (12 percent each) relative to their share of Dublin’s population (25 percent). 633
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 2: Age of Parties Involved in Collisions
Source: City of Dublin; Kittelson, 2020.
Additionally, reported gender was available for 78 percent of bicyclists involved in collisions and for 59 percent of pedestrians involved. The available data show that males represent approximately 60 percent of pedestrians involved in collisions and 83 percent of bicyclists involved in collisions.
DELIVERABLES FROM THE ANALYSIS
The results from HIN and collision analysis are provided in the following attachments:
• Figure 3: Pedestrian Collisions
• Figure 4: Pedestrian Network Screening Results
• Figure 5: Pedestrian High Injury Network
• Figure 6: Bicycle Collisions
• Figure 7: Bicycle Network Screening Results
• Figure 8: Bicycle High Injury Network
• Figure 9: Collision Statistics Infographic
18%
16%
18% 18%
12%
19%
0%
29%
25%
31%
12%
4%
8%
16%
8%
35%
25%
9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Under 5 5-14 years old 15-24 years old 25-44 years old 45-64 years old 65+ years old Share of Pedestrians of Bicyclists
among Reported Ages
Age Group Pedestrians Involved
(63% age reported)
Bicyclists Involved
(76% age reported)
Dublin Population Share
634
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
HIGH INJURY NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS
Draft High Injury Network Extents
Table 3 provides the extents of each draft high injury network.
Table 3: Draft High Injury Network Roadways
Pedestrian Draft High Injury Network Bicycle Draft High Injury Network Roadway Extents Roadway Extents
Amador Valley
Boulevard
I-680 to Burton St
Amador
Valley
Boulevard
San Ramon Rd to Penn Dr
Arnold Drive I-580 to Dublin Blvd
Dublin
Boulevard
Silvergate Dr to Myrtle Dr
Bent Tree Drive
Fallon Dr to Sugar Hill
Terr
Village
Parkway
Dublin Blvd to City Limits (N)
Burton Street
Amador Valley Blvd to
Tamarack Dr
Dublin Boulevard Hansen Dr to Grafton St
Hacienda Drive I-580 to Dublin Blvd
Regional Street
Southern extents to
Amador Valley Blvd
Tamarack Drive
Canterbury Ln to
Brighton Dr
Tassajara Road
Dublin Blvd to Gleason
Dr
Village Parkway Dublin Blvd to Davona Dr
Total Mileage: 8.4 miles Total Mileage: 6.7 miles
Source: City of Dublin; Kittelson, 2020.
Draft High Injury Network Characteristics
Sixty-two percent of the pedestrian collisions occurred on the 8.4 miles of roadway that make up the pedestrian HIN. Sixty-two percent of the bicycle collisions occurred on the 6.7 miles of roadway that make up the bicycle HIN.
General road characteristics of the draft pedestrian HIN include the following:
635
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 June 22, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
• Approximately 40 percent of the pedestrian HIN has a speed limit of 35 miles per hour; 32 percent of the HIN mileage consists of roads with speed limit of 40 or 45 miles per hour, and the remainder of the HIN has a speed limit of 25 or 30 miles per hour.. • Approximately 55 percent of the pedestrian HIN consists of roads classified as arterial roads, with the remainder being collector or residential streets.
• Approximately 47 percent of the HIN has five or six vehicular through lanes. Another 24 percent includes four vehicular through lanes, and the remainder of the HIN has two or three lanes.
General road characteristics of the draft bicycle HIN include the following:
• Approximately 78 percent of the bicycle HIN mileage consists of roads with speed limit of 35 or 45 miles per hour, with the remainder of the HIN having speeds limits of 30 miles per hour. • The bicycle HIN is approximately evenly divided between arterial and collector roadways—54 and 46 percent, respectively.
• Approximately 88 percent of the HIN has four or more vehicular through lanes.
NEXT STEPS
The pedestrian and bicycle HIN will be carried forward as inputs to the network prioritization (Task 4.1) as part of the next task, which will include other input elements upon consultation with the City not quantified here—for example, proximity to schools or demographic information. The descriptive statistics and HIN characteristics described will also be carried forward into subsequent Plan update work, including possible documentation for infrastructure design guidelines and network recommendations (Task 4.2).
636
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 3- Pedestrian Collisions.mxd Date: 6/21/2020 Pedestrian Collision Severity
! Fatal
! Severe Injury
! Other Visible Injury
! Complaint of Pain
! Property Damage Only
Figure 3
Pedestrian Collisions (2014 - 2019)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
637
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 4- Pedestrian Network Screening Results.mxd Date: 6/21/2020 Aggregated Severity Score - Percentile
90 to 100
75 to 90
50 to 75
0 to 50
Figure 4
Pedestrian Network Screening Results
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
638
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 5- Pedestrian High Injury Network - Final.mxd Date: 6/21/2020 Pedestrian High Injury Network
Figure 5
Pedestrian High Injury Network
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
639
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 6- Bicycle Collisions.mxd Date: 6/21/2020 Bicycle Collision Severity
! Fatal
! Severe Injury
! Other Visible Injury
! Complaint of Pain
! Property Damage Only
Figure 6
Bicycle Collisions (2014 - 2019)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
640
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 7- Bicycle Network Screening Results.mxd Date: 6/21/2020 Aggregated Severity Score - Percentile
90 to 100
75 to 90
50 to 75
0 to 50
Figure 7
Bicycle Network Screening Results
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
641
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trai
§¨¦ l
680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\Collision Analysis\Figure 8- Bicycle High Injury Network - Final.mxd Date: 6/22/2020 Bicycle High Injury Network
Figure 8
Bicycle High Injury Network
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
642
of bike collisions
resulted in a fatality
or severe injury
of pedestrian
collisions occur at
an intersection
of pedestrian
collisions are hit
and run collisions
of pedestrian
collisions resulted
in a fatality or
severe injury
of bike collisions
occur at an
intersection
Automobile
Right of Way
Violation
Improper
Turning
THE TOP 2 CITED PRIMARY COLLISION
FACTORS FOR BIKE COLLISIONS ARE:
(Failure to yield right-of-way
to conflicting traffic)
Village Pkwy
Hacienda Dr
54% Dublin Blvd
22%
16% Amador Valley Blvd
8%
Pedestrian High Injury Network
Hacienda Dr
Amador Valley Blvd
Tamarack Dr
Burton St
Village Pkwy
Arnold Rd
Tassajara Rd
Bicycle High Injury Network
4%
6%
5% Regional St
13%
7%
1%
4%
5%
51% Dublin Blvd
5% Bent Tree Dr
643
Attachment A: Network Screening Results
644
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Pedestrian Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile Percentile Group
623 DUBLIN BL 0 2 2 1 0 5 0.5 5.833333333 1 0.994444444 90_100 663 DUBLIN BL 1 0 3 1 0 5 0.5 5 2 0.988888889 90_100
1335 REGIONAL ST 0 1 3 0 3 7 0.402237 4.666666667 3 0.983333333 90_100 469 DUBLIN BL 0 0 4 1 1 6 0.5 4.333333333 4 0.977777778 90_100 491 DUBLIN BL 0 0 4 1 1 6 0.5 4.333333333 5 0.972222222 90_100 573 DUBLIN BL 0 0 4 1 1 6 0.5 4.333333333 6 0.966666667 90_100 710 DUBLIN BL 0 0 4 1 1 6 0.5 4.333333333 7 0.961111111 90_100 349 DUBLIN BL 1 0 2 1 0 4 0.5 4.166666667 8 0.955555556 90_100 386 DUBLIN BL 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.5 4.166666667 9 0.95 90_100 449 DUBLIN BL 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.5 4.166666667 10 0.944444444 90_100 718 DUBLIN BL 0 1 2 0 1 4 0.5 3.5 11 0.938888889 90_100 94 ARNOLD RD 1 0 1 1 1 4 0.5 3.5 12 0.933333333 90_100
202 ARNOLD RD 1 0 1 1 1 4 0.5 3.5 13 0.927777778 90_100 282 ARNOLD RD 1 0 1 1 1 4 0.5 3.5 14 0.922222222 90_100 147 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.5 3.333333333 15 0.916666667 90_100 501 DUBLIN BL 1 0 1 1 0 3 0.5 3.333333333 16 0.911111111 90_100 672 DUBLIN BL 1 0 1 1 0 3 0.5 3.333333333 17 0.905555556 90_100 690 DUBLIN BL 1 0 1 1 0 3 0.5 3.333333333 18 0.9 90_100 1031 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.5 3.333333333 19 0.894444444 90_100 1164 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.5 3.333333333 20 0.888888889 90_100 1256 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.5 3.333333333 21 0.883333333 90_100 399 DUBLIN CT 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.1944855 3.333333333 22 0.877777778 90_100 583 DUBLIN BL 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 3.333333333 23 0.872222222 90_100 724 DUBLIN BL 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 3.333333333 24 0.866666667 90_100 1143 TRALEE VILLAGE DR 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.2343014 3.333333333 25 0.861111111 90_100 641 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 2 5 0.5 2.833333333 26 0.855555556 75_90 339 HACIENDA DR 1 0 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 27 0.85 75_90 477 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 1 4 0.5 2.666666667 28 0.844444444 75_90 485 DUBLIN BL 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 29 0.838888889 75_90 493 HACIENDA DR 1 0 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 30 0.833333333 75_90 522 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 1 4 0.5 2.666666667 31 0.827777778 75_90 537 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 1 4 0.5 2.666666667 32 0.822222222 75_90 586 DUBLIN BL 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 33 0.816666667 75_90 594 HACIENDA DR 1 0 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 34 0.811111111 75_90 631 DUBLIN BL 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 35 0.805555556 75_90 683 DUBLIN BL 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.5 2.666666667 36 0.8 75_90
1485 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 2 1 4 0.5 2.666666667 37 0.794444444 75_90 97 BENT TREE DR 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.3832796 2.5 38 0.788888889 75_90 126 BURTON ST 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.0990718 2.5 39 0.783333333 75_90 740 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 40 0.777777778 75_90
750 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 41 0.772222222 75_90
1033 TWIN EAGLES LN 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.12372 2.5 42 0.766666667 75_90 1095 TAMARACK DR 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 43 0.761111111 75_90 1232 TAMARACK DR 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 44 0.755555556 75_90 1364 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 45 0.75 75_90
1386 VILLAGE PW 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.5 2.5 46 0.744444444 75_90 1393 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.5 2.5 47 0.738888889 75_90 1398 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.5 2.5 48 0.733333333 75_90 1407 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 2.5 49 0.727777778 75_90 133 AMADOR PLAZA RD 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.5 1.833333333 50 0.722222222 50_75 680 GLYNNIS ROSE DR 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.3829053 1.833333333 51 0.716666667 50_75 74 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 52 0.711111111 50_75 158 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 53 0.705555556 50_75 227 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 54 0.7 50_75 275 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 55 0.694444444 50_75 324 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 56 0.688888889 50_75 333 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 57 0.683333333 50_75 365 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 58 0.677777778 50_75 649 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 1.833333333 59 0.672222222 50_75 972 KEEGAN ST 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.2691345 1.833333333 60 0.666666667 50_75 53 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 61 0.661111111 50_75 79 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 62 0.655555556 50_75 86 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 63 0.65 50_75 110 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 64 0.644444444 50_75 129 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 65 0.638888889 50_75 166 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 66 0.633333333 50_75 174 AMADOR PLAZA RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 67 0.627777778 50_75 193 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 68 0.622222222 50_75 204 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 69 0.616666667 50_75 241 ASPEN ST 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.3253174 1.666666667 70 0.611111111 50_75 278 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 71 0.605555556 50_75 284 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 72 0.6 50_75 330 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 73 0.594444444 50_75 413 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 74 0.588888889 50_75 433 CLARK AV 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.2139419 1.666666667 75 0.583333333 50_75 818 LOCUST PL N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.1212688 1.666666667 76 0.577777778 50_75 907 HILLBROOK PL 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.2892606 1.666666667 77 0.572222222 50_75 1029 SAN RAMON RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 78 0.566666667 50_75 1072 ROLLING HILLS DR 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 79 0.561111111 50_75 1081 SAN RAMON RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 80 0.555555556 50_75
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Pedestrian Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile Percentile Group
1167 TYNE CT 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.03766 1.666666667 81 0.55 50_75 1186 SAN RAMON RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 82 0.544444444 50_75 1266 ROLLING HILLS DR 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 83 0.538888889 50_75 1300 TAMARACK DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 84 0.533333333 50_75 1312 PENN DR 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.3329521 1.666666667 85 0.527777778 50_75 1320 SAN RAMON RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 86 0.522222222 50_75 1344 SIERRA CT 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 87 0.516666667 50_75 1355 SAN RAMON RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 1.666666667 88 0.511111111 50_75 1363 VOMAC RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.4393404 1.666666667 89 0.505555556 50_75 1426 W VOMAC RD 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.456675 1.666666667 90 0.5 50_75 1465 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 91 0.494444444 50_75 1467 WINDING TRAIL LN 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.027529 1.666666667 92 0.488888889 50_75 1471 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 93 0.483333333 50_75 1479 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 94 0.477777778 50_75 1493 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 1.666666667 95 0.472222222 50_75 52 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 96 0.466666667 0_50
58 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 97 0.461111111 0_50
105 ANTONE WY 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.3626265 1 98 0.455555556 0_50 124 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 99 0.45 0_50
128 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 100 0.444444444 0_50
186 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 101 0.438888889 0_50
192 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 102 0.433333333 0_50
251 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 103 0.427777778 0_50
317 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 104 0.422222222 0_50
323 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 105 0.416666667 0_50
401 HACIENDA DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 106 0.411111111 0_50
428 GRAFTON ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 107 0.405555556 0_50
429 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 108 0.4 0_50
538 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 1 109 0.394444444 0_50
892 MYRTLE DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.1348713 1 110 0.388888889 0_50 986 LEE THOMPSON ST 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.2958484 1 111 0.383333333 0_50 1024 SAINT PATRICK WY 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.3965917 1 112 0.377777778 0_50 1156 TOYOTA DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.1965035 1 113 0.372222222 0_50 1451 VILLAGE PW 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 114 0.366666667 0_50
68 AMANDA ST 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.1037903 0.833333333 115 0.361111111 0_50 80 CANTERBURY LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 116 0.355555556 0_50 98 CAMPBELL GREEN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0255053 0.833333333 117 0.35 0_50 167 CHARLTON CT 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.0127258 0.833333333 118 0.344444444 0_50 194 CAMPBELL LN 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.1909359 0.833333333 119 0.338888889 0_50 249 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 120 0.333333333 0_50 257 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 121 0.327777778 0_50 306 CANTERBURY LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 122 0.322222222 0_50 341 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 123 0.316666667 0_50 346 HARTLAND LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0431559 0.833333333 124 0.311111111 0_50 357 DAVONA DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 125 0.305555556 0_50 376 E CANTARA DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.1453459 0.833333333 126 0.3 0_50 380 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 127 0.294444444 0_50 421 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 128 0.288888889 0_50 426 CIVIC PZ 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.2322135 0.833333333 129 0.283333333 0_50 435 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 130 0.277777778 0_50 447 DAVONA DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 131 0.272222222 0_50 474 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 132 0.266666667 0_50 514 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 133 0.261111111 0_50 547 HARTLAND CT 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0415387 0.833333333 134 0.255555556 0_50 568 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 135 0.25 0_50 588 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 136 0.244444444 0_50 603 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 137 0.238888889 0_50 614 HACIENDA DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 138 0.233333333 0_50 616 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 139 0.227777778 0_50 617 FOXCROFT WY 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.061691 0.833333333 140 0.222222222 0_50 657 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 141 0.216666667 0_50 705 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 142 0.211111111 0_50 734 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 143 0.205555556 0_50 737 GOLDEN GATE DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.2084345 0.833333333 144 0.2 0_50 738 GROVELAND LN 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.0417226 0.833333333 145 0.194444444 0_50 779 LOCKHART ST 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 146 0.188888889 0_50 792 OAK BLUFF LN 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.2777243 0.833333333 147 0.183333333 0_50 805 N SPAGO DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.1618169 0.833333333 148 0.177777778 0_50 820 N DUBLIN RANCH DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 149 0.172222222 0_50 845 HIBERNIA DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.3222054 0.833333333 150 0.166666667 0_50 853 LEWIS AV 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0782577 0.833333333 151 0.161111111 0_50 887 LOCKHART ST 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 152 0.155555556 0_50 913 N DUBLIN RANCH DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 153 0.15 0_50 925 LOCKHART ST 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 154 0.144444444 0_50 957 IRONHORSE PW 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.3890455 0.833333333 155 0.138888889 0_50 1001 MARTINELLI WY 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 156 0.133333333 0_50 1094 SIERRA CT 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 157 0.127777778 0_50 1099 PALERMO WY 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 158 0.122222222 0_50 1117 S BRIDGEPOINTE LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.2159105 0.833333333 159 0.116666667 0_50 1135 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 160 0.111111111 0_50
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Pedestrian Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile Percentile Group
1136 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 161 0.105555556 0_50 1155 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 162 0.1 0_50 1192 SIERRA CT 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 163 0.094444444 0_50 1197 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 164 0.088888889 0_50 1218 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 165 0.083333333 0_50 1260 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 166 0.077777778 0_50 1324 SUTTON LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.1856974 0.833333333 167 0.072222222 0_50 1422 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 168 0.066666667 0_50 1446 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.833333333 169 0.061111111 0_50 1457 UNNAMED 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.0515973 0.833333333 170 0.055555556 0_50 1484 WICKLOW LN 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.4141705 0.833333333 171 0.05 0_50 203 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 172 0.044444444 0_50 268 BROOKDALE CT 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0938058 0.166666667 173 0.038888889 0_50 361 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 174 0.033333333 0_50 572 HACIENDA CROSSING 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.3605973 0.166666667 175 0.027777778 0_50 888 MANSFIELD AV 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.2744785 0.166666667 176 0.022222222 0_50 1013 MARTINELLI WY 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 177 0.016666667 0_50 1205 SHADOW PL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0251716 0.166666667 178 0.011111111 0_50 1325 SHADOW DR 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.1588817 0.166666667 179 0.005555556 0_50 1487 UNNAMED 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0811947 0.166666667 180 0 0_50
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Crash
Frequency
(annual)
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile
Percentile
Group
624 DUBLIN BL 1 1 2 2 0 6 0.5 1 6.666666667 1 0.994252874 90_100 1439 VILLAGE PW 0 1 4 1 1 7 0.5 1.166666667 6 2 0.988505747 90_100 454 DUBLIN BL 0 0 3 3 4 10 0.5 1.666666667 5.666666667 3 0.982758621 90_100 674 DUBLIN BL 0 0 3 3 3 9 0.5 1.5 5.5 4 0.977011494 90_100 461 DUBLIN BL 1 1 0 2 0 4 0.5 0.666666667 5 5 0.971264368 90_100 572 DUBLIN BL 1 1 0 2 0 4 0.5 0.666666667 5 6 0.965517241 90_100 1422 VILLAGE PW 0 1 4 0 0 5 0.5 0.833333333 5 7 0.959770115 90_100 1451 VILLAGE PW 0 1 4 0 0 5 0.5 0.833333333 5 8 0.954022989 90_100 1478 VILLAGE PW 0 1 4 0 0 5 0.5 0.833333333 5 9 0.948275862 90_100 355 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 3 2 7 0.5 1.166666667 4.5 10 0.942528736 90_100 1360 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 3 1 6 0.5 1 4.333333333 11 0.936781609 90_100 1455 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 3 1 6 0.5 1 4.333333333 12 0.931034483 90_100 1463 VILLAGE PW 0 0 3 2 1 6 0.5 1 4.333333333 13 0.925287356 90_100 19 ARNOLD RD 1 1 0 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 4.166666667 14 0.91954023 90_100 40 ARNOLD RD 1 1 0 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 4.166666667 15 0.913793103 90_100 215 ARNOLD RD 1 1 0 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 4.166666667 16 0.908045977 90_100 543 DUBLIN BL 1 1 0 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 4.166666667 17 0.902298851 90_100 644 DUBLIN BL 1 1 0 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 4.166666667 18 0.896551724 90_100 559 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 2 3 7 0.5 1.166666667 3.833333333 19 0.890804598 75_90 745 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 2 3 7 0.5 1.166666667 3.833333333 20 0.885057471 75_90 1470 VILLAGE PW 0 0 2 2 2 6 0.5 1 3.666666667 21 0.879310345 75_90 1380 VILLAGE PW 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.5 0.5 3.333333333 22 0.873563218 75_90 89 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 2 1 1 4 0.5 0.666666667 2.666666667 23 0.867816092 75_90 182 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 2 1 1 4 0.5 0.666666667 2.666666667 24 0.862068966 75_90 1366 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 2 1 4 0.5 0.666666667 2.666666667 25 0.856321839 75_90 54 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 2.5 26 0.850574713 75_90 251 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 2.5 27 0.844827586 75_90 363 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 2.5 28 0.83908046 75_90 533 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.5 0.5 2.5 29 0.833333333 75_90 1387 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.5 0.5 2.5 30 0.827586207 75_90 507 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 1 4 6 0.5 1 2.333333333 31 0.82183908 75_90 723 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 1 4 6 0.5 1 2.333333333 32 0.816091954 75_90 1412 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 1 2 4 0.5 0.666666667 2 33 0.810344828 75_90 440 HACIENDA DR 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 34 0.804597701 75_90 524 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 35 0.798850575 75_90 550 HACIENDA DR 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 36 0.793103448 75_90 555 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 37 0.787356322 75_90 592 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 38 0.781609195 75_90 602 HACIENDA DR 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 39 0.775862069 75_90 610 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 40 0.770114943 75_90 639 HACIENDA DR 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 41 0.764367816 75_90 683 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 2 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 42 0.75862069 75_90 136 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 43 0.752873563 75_90 224 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 44 0.747126437 75_90 331 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 45 0.74137931 75_90 1075 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 46 0.735632184 75_90 1090 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 47 0.729885057 75_90 1097 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 48 0.724137931 75_90 1113 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 49 0.718390805 75_90 1235 TAMARACK DR 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.5 0.5 1.833333333 50 0.712643678 75_90 2 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 51 0.706896552 50_75 41 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 52 0.701149425 50_75 44 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 53 0.695402299 50_75 58 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 54 0.689655172 50_75 72 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 55 0.683908046 50_75 97 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 56 0.67816092 50_75 189 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 57 0.672413793 50_75 217 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 58 0.666666667 50_75 292 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 59 0.66091954 50_75 329 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 60 0.655172414 50_75 346 FALLON RD 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 61 0.649425287 50_75 424 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 62 0.643678161 50_75 464 DUBLIN BL 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 63 0.637931034 50_75 598 FALLON RD 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 64 0.632183908 50_75 754 FALLON RD 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 65 0.626436782 50_75 782 HIBERNIA DR 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.3222054 0.333333333 1.666666667 66 0.620689655 50_75 1287 REGIONAL ST 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.402237 0.333333333 1.666666667 67 0.614942529 50_75 1445 VILLAGE PW 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.5 0.333333333 1.666666667 68 0.609195402 50_75 731 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 3 4 0.5 0.666666667 1.333333333 69 0.603448276 50_75 133 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 70 0.597701149 50_75 194 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 71 0.591954023 50_75 235 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 72 0.586206897 50_75 334 GRAFTON ST 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 73 0.58045977 50_75 446 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 74 0.574712644 50_75 613 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.5 0.5 1.166666667 75 0.568965517 50_75 43 BRANNIGAN ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 76 0.563218391 50_75 80 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 77 0.557471264 50_75 111 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 78 0.551724138 50_75 156 BRANNIGAN ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 79 0.545977011 50_75 237 BRANNIGAN ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 80 0.540229885 50_75 648
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Crash
Frequency
(annual)
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile
Percentile
Group
264 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 81 0.534482759 50_75 311 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 82 0.528735632 50_75 328 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 83 0.522988506 50_75 337 GLEASON DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 84 0.517241379 50_75 383 GLEASON DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 85 0.511494253 50_75 410 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 86 0.505747126 50_75 416 HACIENDA DR 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 87 0.5 50_75 451 GLEASON DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 88 0.494252874 50_75 480 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 89 0.488505747 50_75 482 GRAFTON ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 90 0.482758621 50_75 509 GLEASON DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 91 0.477011494 50_75 513 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 92 0.471264368 50_75 539 GRAFTON ST 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 93 0.465517241 50_75 553 GLEASON DR 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 94 0.459770115 50_75 585 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 95 0.454022989 50_75 650 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 96 0.448275862 50_75 1039 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 97 0.442528736 50_75 1189 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 0.333333333 1 98 0.436781609 50_75 49 CENTRAL PW 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 99 0.431034483 0_50 50 ASPEN ST 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.3253174 0.166666667 0.833333333 100 0.425287356 0_50 105 ASTERWOOD DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.2313162 0.166666667 0.833333333 101 0.41954023 0_50 117 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 102 0.413793103 0_50 225 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 103 0.408045977 0_50 267 BENT TREE DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.3832796 0.166666667 0.833333333 104 0.402298851 0_50 291 CENTRAL PW 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 105 0.396551724 0_50 304 CENTRAL PW 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 106 0.390804598 0_50 336 HASTINGS WY 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0315332 0.166666667 0.833333333 107 0.385057471 0_50 360 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 108 0.379310345 0_50 397 FALLON RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 109 0.373563218 0_50 435 FALLON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 110 0.367816092 0_50 436 FORINO DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 111 0.362068966 0_50 473 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 112 0.356321839 0_50 519 FALLON RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 113 0.350574713 0_50 536 FORINO DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 114 0.344827586 0_50 563 FALLON RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 115 0.33908046 0_50 618 CROAK RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.330384 0.166666667 0.833333333 116 0.333333333 0_50 627 FALLON RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 117 0.327586207 0_50 649 FALLON RD 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 118 0.32183908 0_50 682 CLARK AV 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.2139419 0.166666667 0.833333333 119 0.316091954 0_50 710 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 120 0.310344828 0_50 730 DUBLIN BL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 121 0.304597701 0_50 740 DAVONA DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 122 0.298850575 0_50 879 IRONHORSE PW 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.3890455 0.166666667 0.833333333 123 0.293103448 0_50 1047 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 124 0.287356322 0_50 1053 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 125 0.281609195 0_50 1086 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 126 0.275862069 0_50 1103 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 127 0.270114943 0_50 1122 POSITANO PW 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 128 0.264367816 0_50 1125 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 129 0.25862069 0_50 1152 SUMMER GLEN DR 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.4586498 0.166666667 0.833333333 130 0.252873563 0_50 1219 REDWOOD AV 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.1709642 0.166666667 0.833333333 131 0.247126437 0_50 1253 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 132 0.24137931 0_50 1254 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 133 0.235632184 0_50 1276 TWIN EAGLES LN 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12372 0.166666667 0.833333333 134 0.229885057 0_50 1296 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 135 0.224137931 0_50 1307 SCARLETT DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.2489757 0.166666667 0.833333333 136 0.218390805 0_50 1323 SAN RAMON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 137 0.212643678 0_50 1354 TASSAJARA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 138 0.206896552 0_50 1372 VOMAC RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.4393404 0.166666667 0.833333333 139 0.201149425 0_50 1397 VALENTANO DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 140 0.195402299 0_50 1497 W VOMAC RD 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.456675 0.166666667 0.833333333 141 0.189655172 0_50 1498 VALENTANO DR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.833333333 142 0.183908046 0_50 231 AMADOR PLAZA RD 0 0 0 0 3 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 143 0.17816092 0_50 606 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 3 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 144 0.172413793 0_50 101 AMADOR PLAZA RD 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 145 0.166666667 0_50 341 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 146 0.16091954 0_50 396 DOUGHERTY RD 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 147 0.155172414 0_50 406 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 148 0.149425287 0_50 411 DOUGHERTY RD 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 149 0.143678161 0_50 444 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 150 0.137931034 0_50 694 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 151 0.132183908 0_50 750 DOUGHERTY RD 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 0.333333333 0.333333333 152 0.126436782 0_50 1012 LANCASTER RD 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.2953148 0.333333333 0.333333333 153 0.120689655 0_50 257 BRIGHTON DR 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 154 0.114942529 0_50 283 AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 155 0.109195402 0_50 295 CAPOTERRA WY 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.3317445 0.166666667 0.166666667 156 0.103448276 0_50 393 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 157 0.097701149 0_50 455 DOUGHERTY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 158 0.091954023 0_50 462 CLARINBRIDGE CI 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0359862 0.166666667 0.166666667 159 0.086206897 0_50 548 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 160 0.08045977 0_50 649
24392 - Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Network Screening Segments
Kittelson Associates, Inc.
FID Street
Fatal
Crashes
Severe
Injury
Crashes
Moderate
Injury
Crashes
Minor
Injury
Crashes
PDO
Crashes
Total
Crashes
Segment
Length
Crash
Frequency
(annual)
Annualized
EqPDO Score Rank Percentile
Percentile
Group
637 CIVIC PZ 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.2322135 0.166666667 0.166666667 161 0.074712644 0_50 668 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 162 0.068965517 0_50 736 DUBLIN BL 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 163 0.063218391 0_50 849 KOHNEN WY 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.2406822 0.166666667 0.166666667 164 0.057471264 0_50 995 MARIPOSA CI 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.1274 0.166666667 0.166666667 165 0.051724138 0_50 1026 SIERRA CT 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 166 0.045977011 0_50 1182 PENN DR 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.3329521 0.166666667 0.166666667 167 0.040229885 0_50 1200 STAGECOACH RD 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 168 0.034482759 0_50 1282 STAGECOACH RD 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 169 0.028735632 0_50 1290 SIERRA LN 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.3366714 0.166666667 0.166666667 170 0.022988506 0_50 1341 S MARIPOSA LN 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.159664 0.166666667 0.166666667 171 0.017241379 0_50 1347 STAGECOACH RD 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0.166666667 0.166666667 172 0.011494253 0_50 1362 WHITWORTH DR 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.2065178 0.166666667 0.166666667 173 0.005747126 0_50 1490 UTICA CT 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0663647 0.166666667 0.166666667 174 0 0_50 650
Attachment B: Collision Database
651
Dublin Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Collision Database Comparison Kittelson Associates, Inc.
City-provided database TIMS Download
Involved With Bicycle BICYCLE_ACCIDENT Y
Count of Report No Column Labels Count of CASE_ID Column Labels Row Labels 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Grand Total Row Labels 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Grand Total Fatal/Sev 1 2 3 Fatal/Sev 1 2 3
Other 16 12 9 11 8 9 65 Other 9 11 9 12 8 10 59
Grand Total 17 12 11 11 8 9 68 Grand Total 10 11 11 12 8 10 62 Involved With Pedestrian PEDESTRIAN_ACCIDENT Y
Count of Report No Column Labels Count of CASE_ID Column Labels Row Labels 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Grand Total Row Labels 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Grand Total Fatal/Sev 4 1 2 2 2 1 12 Fatal/Sev 3 1 1 2 1 8
Other 8 12 8 11 16 14 69 Other 7 7 6 10 8 6 44
Grand Total 12 13 10 13 18 15 81 Grand Total 10 8 7 12 9 6 52 652
Dublin Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pedestrian Collisions Kittelson Associates, Inc.
Report No Collision date Collision TimeDay Location Distance Direction Lighting Weather Collision Type Involved With PCF Hit and RunInjury Degreeseverity Injured Killed Year InjuredNumber KilledNumber D14-00306 2014-01-29 08:33 WednesdayTAMARACK DR - BURTON ST 100' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-00318 2014-01-30 16:36 Thursday AMADOR VALLEY BL - BURTON ST 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-00769 2014-03-13 12:17 Thursday TOYOTA DR - DUBLIN BL 6' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-00980 2014-04-02 13:33 WednesdayDUBLIN BL - DUBLIN CT 242' Direction: North Daylight Cloudy Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-01226 2014-04-23 10:06 WednesdayTASSAJARA RD - DUBLIN BL 14' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-02675 2014-09-15 07:58 Monday VILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 3' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-02703 2014-09-17 09:54 WednesdayLOCUST PL N - WINEBERRY WY 336' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 0 0 D14-02791 2014-09-26 10:42 Friday BENT TREE DR - TWIN EAGLES LN 10' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-02824 2014-09-29 15:38 Monday VILLAGE PW - LEWIS AV 50' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-02883 2014-10-04 00:10 Saturday ARNOLD RD - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-03027 2014-10-17 11:37 Friday AMADOR VALLEY BL - REGIONAL ST 348' Direction: East Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 1 0 D14-03410 2014-11-22 21:09 Saturday DUBLIN BL - REGIONAL ST 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Cloudy Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2014 2 0 D1500341 2015-02-04 18:20 WednesdaySAN RAMON RD - VOMAC RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1500799 2015-03-20 08:44 Friday TAMARACK DR - AMANDA ST 83' Direction: East Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2015 2 0 D1500864 2015-03-25 14:51 WednesdayVILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 660' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1501259 2015-05-02 14:00 Saturday BRIDGEPOINTE LN - HARTLAND LN 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1501579 2015-06-05 11:41 Friday SAN RAMON RD - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1501650 2015-06-12 15:50 Friday VILLAGE PW - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: Misdemeanor Property Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 0 0 D1501739 2015-06-21 19:42 Sunday DUBLIN BL - GLYNNIS ROSE DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 0 0 D1501807 2015-06-29 08:50 Monday DUBLIN RANCH DR - OAK BLUFF LN 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1502220 2015-08-07 09:16 Friday CHARLTON CT - FOXCROFT WY 46' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1502301 2015-08-15 13:04 Saturday REGIONAL ST - AMADOR VALLEY BL 13' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1502700 2015-09-23 08:25 WednesdayVILLAGE PW - AMADOR VALLEY BL 229' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1502752 2015-09-27 11:37 Sunday REGIONAL ST - SAINT PATRICK WY 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 0 0 D1503346 2015-11-22 15:46 Sunday VILLAGE PW - TAMARACK DR 30' Direction: East Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 1 0 D1601088 2016-04-19 13:31 Tuesday DUBLIN BL - CLARK AV 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 1 0 D1601144 2016-04-25 22:59 Monday DUBLIN BL - ARNOLD RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Not Stated Hit & Run: NoFatal 1 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 1 2016 1 1 D1601267 2016-05-08 01:04 Sunday PENN DR - TYNE CT 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Not Functioning Cloudy Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Not Stated Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2016 2 0 D1601647 2016-06-13 12:29 Monday DUBLIN BL - SIERRA CT 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 1 0 D1601861 2016-07-01 23:31 Friday ARNOLD RD - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Not Stated Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 1 0 D1601956 2016-07-13 10:10 WednesdayDUBLIN BL - REGIONAL ST 26' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 0 0 D1602786 2016-09-21 14:07 WednesdayCANTARA DR - SPAGO DR (N) 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 1 0 D1602817 2016-09-24 17:24 Saturday HACIENDA CROSSING - HACIENDA DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 0 0 D1603327 2016-11-06 17:00 Sunday DUBLIN BL - TASSAJARA RD 12' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 1 0 D1603835 2016-12-16 17:50 Friday AMADOR PLAZA RD - AMADOR VALLEY BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 0 0 D1700553 2017-02-17 15:49 Friday SHADOW DR - SHADOW PL 150' Direction: West Daylight Raining Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Starting or Backing Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 0 0 D1701856 2017-06-13 09:06 Tuesday HACIENDA DR - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Improper Passing Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1702023 2017-06-28 12:13 WednesdayCAMPBELL LN - DUBLIN BL 12' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1702661 2017-08-19 16:19 Saturday SUTTON LN - CANTERBURY LN (E) 102' Direction: South Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1702791 2017-08-30 18:58 WednesdayROLLING HILLS DR - WINDING TRAIL LN 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Speed Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2017 2 0 D1702823 2017-09-02 18:39 Saturday VILLAGE PW - AMADOR VALLEY BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1702941 2017-09-12 08:03 Tuesday CENTRAL PW - ASPEN ST 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Speed Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2017 2 0 D1703065 2017-09-20 19:55 WednesdayIN PARKING LOT OF 4100 GRAFTON - NULL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1703166 2017-09-28 17:58 Thursday ANTONE WY - GRAFTON ST 11' Direction: West Duk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Speed Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1703403 2017-10-18 09:32 WednesdayCENTRAL PW - ASPEN ST 13' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1703793 2017-11-21 13:40 Tuesday DUBLIN BL - GOLDEN GATE DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 1 0 D1703974 2017-12-04 15:50 Monday BRIGHTON DR - CALLAN ST 342' Direction: East Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Starting or Backing Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 0 0 KAI1 2017-12-20 20:40 HACIENDA & 580, DUBLIN, CA 86' Direction: North Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian Violatoin Fatal 1 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 1 2017 0 1 D1800044 2018-01-05 06:11 Friday TWIN EAGLES LN - BENT TREE DR 9' Direction: North Dark - Street Lights Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1800114 2018-01-10 12:15 WednesdayHILLBROOK PL - NULL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Cloudy Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoFatal 1 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 1 2018 0 1 D1800168 2018-01-12 16:56 Friday DUBLIN BL - GLYNNIS ROSE DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2018 2 0 D1800901 2018-03-05 08:18 Monday PALERMO WY - LOCKHART ST 8' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1800993 2018-03-10 17:34 Saturday 5200 DUBLIN BLVD-PARKING LOT - NULL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1801748 2018-05-09 14:35 WednesdayCENTRAL PW - LEE THOMPSON ST 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Traffic Signals and Signs Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1802496 2018-07-10 12:47 Tuesday DUBLIN BL - CLARK AV 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1802655 2018-07-21 17:36 Saturday BROOKDALE CT - MANSFIELD AV 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 0 0 D1802760 2018-07-29 13:19 Sunday LAZY DOG P/LOT - NULL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 0 0 D1802763 2018-07-29 14:02 Sunday PANDA EXPRESS P/LOT - NULL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unknown Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1802975 2018-08-15 11:59 WednesdayREGIONAL ST - SAINT PATRICK WY 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1803146 2018-08-27 17:14 Monday TASSAJARA RD - DUBLIN BL 708' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Not Stated Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1803168 2018-08-29 14:13 WednesdayARNOLD RD - MARTINELLI WY 250' Direction: North Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Unsafe Starting or Backing Hit & Run: Misdemeanor Property Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 0 0 D1803740 2018-10-11 08:00 Thursday ANTONE WY - GRAFTON ST 11' Direction: West Duk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: Misdemeanor Property Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 0 0 D1803965 2018-10-31 08:44 WednesdayDUBLIN BL - DUBLIN CT 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1803967 2018-10-31 08:52 WednesdayDUBLIN BL - GLYNNIS ROSE DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1804307 2018-11-29 15:12 Thursday DAVONA DR - WICKLOW LN (N) 446' Direction: East Daylight Cloudy Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian Violation Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1804497 2018-12-13 15:28 Thursday AMADOR VALLEY BL - BURTON ST 10' Direction: West Daylight Clear Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 1 0 D1900808 2019-03-02 18:34 Saturday HIBERNIA DR - DUBLIN BL 243' Direction: South Dark - Street Lights Raining Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 1 0 D1900852 2019-03-05 23:16 Tuesday SIERRA CT - PRIVATE PROPERTY 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Cloudy Rear-End Pedestrian Other Improper Driving Hit & Run: NoCmplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 1 0 653
Dublin Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Bicycle Collisions Kittelson Associates, Inc.
Report No Collision date
Collision
Time Day Location Distance Direction Lighting Weather
Collision
Type
Involved
With PCF
Hit and
Run Injury Degree severity Injured Killed Year Street1 Street2 Address InjuredNu
mber
KilledNum
ber
D14-00229 2014-01-22 18:21 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - DOUGHERTY RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Other Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL DOUGHERTY RD DUBLIN BL & DOUGHERTY RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-00842 2014-03-17 10:15 Monday DUBLIN BL - TASSAJARA RD 365' Direction: West Dark - Street Lights Clear Other Bicycle Unknown Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL TASSAJARA RD DUBLIN BL & TASSAJARA RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-01146 2014-04-16 15:35 Wednesday HACIENDA DR - CENTRAL PW 464' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Unsafe SpeedHit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 HACIENDA DR CENTRAL PWHACIENDA DR & CENTRAL PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-01364 2014-05-08 10:30 Thursday DUBLIN BL - SIERRA CT 201' Direction: East Daylight Cloudy Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL SIERRA CT DUBLIN BL & SIERRA CT, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-01373 2014-05-08 19:00 Thursday DUBLIN BL - CLARINBRIDGE CI 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL CLARINBRIDGE CI DUBLIN BL & CLARINBRIDGE CI, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-01900 2014-06-25 15:08 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - SCARLETT DR 0' Direction: West Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Unknown Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL SCARLETT DRDUBLIN BL & SCARLETT DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-02193 2014-07-23 19:24 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - SAN RAMON RD 10' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL SAN RAMON RD DUBLIN BL & SAN RAMON RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-02228 2014-07-26 16:56 Saturday DUBLIN BL - HIBERNIA DR 16' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL HIBERNIA DRDUBLIN BL & HIBERNIA DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-02255 2014-07-30 06:51 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - ARNOLD RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoFatal 1 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 1 2014 DUBLIN BL ARNOLD RDDUBLIN BL & ARNOLD RD, Dublin, CA 0 1 D14-02634 2014-09-10 17:26 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - SAN RAMON RD 100' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Unsafe Starting or Backing Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL SAN RAMON RD DUBLIN BL & SAN RAMON RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-02645 2014-09-11 15:23 Thursday LANCASTER RD - UTICA CT 40' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Other Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 LANCASTER RD UTICA CT LANCASTER RD & UTICA CT, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-02674 2014-09-15 07:23 Monday VILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 464' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR VILLAGE PW & BRIGHTON DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-02867 2014-10-03 08:23 Friday BRIGHTON DR - AMADOR VALLEY BL 11' Direction: North Daylight Cloudy Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 BRIGHTON DR AMADOR VALLEY BL BRIGHTON DR & AMADOR VALLEY BL, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-03065 2014-10-21 07:25 Tuesday DUBLIN BL - VILLAGE PW 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Unknown Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL VILLAGE PWDUBLIN BL & VILLAGE PW, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-03230 2014-11-07 08:07 Friday BENT TREE DR - TWIN EAGLES LN 7' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 BENT TREE DR TWIN EAGLES LN BENT TREE DR & TWIN EAGLES LN, Dublin, CA 1 0 D14-03634 2014-12-16 17:19 Tuesday AMADOR PLAZA RD - AMADOR VALLEY BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Raining Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2014 AMADOR PLAZA RD AMADOR VALLEY BL AMADOR PLAZA RD & AMADOR VALLEY BL, Dublin, CA 0 0 D14-03679 2014-12-20 11:01 Saturday DUBLIN BL - CLARK AV 256' Direction: East Daylight Cloudy Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2014 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV DUBLIN BL & CLARK AV, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1500727 2015-03-13 16:47 Friday BRANNIGAN ST - WHITWORTH DR 125' Direction: South Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Passing Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 BRANNIGAN ST WHITWORTH DR BRANNIGAN ST & WHITWORTH DR, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1500839 2015-03-23 12:14 Monday VILLAGE PW - TAMARACK DR 16' Direction: South Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 VILLAGE PW TAMARACK DR VILLAGE PW & TAMARACK DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1500979 2015-04-06 06:48 Monday DUBLIN BL - HIBERNIA DR 10' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 DUBLIN BL HIBERNIA DRDUBLIN BL & HIBERNIA DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1501144 2015-04-23 12:02 Thursday SIERRA LN - DOUGHERTY RD 2' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 SIERRA LN DOUGHERTY RD SIERRA LN & DOUGHERTY RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1501277 2015-05-07 11:23 Thursday CENTRAL PW - BRANNIGAN ST 13' Direction: East Daylight Cloudy Other Bicycle Traffic Signals and Signs Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 CENTRAL PW BRANNIGAN ST CENTRAL PW & BRANNIGAN ST, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1502206 2015-08-05 16:54 Wednesday REGIONAL ST - AMADOR VALLEY BL 0' Direction: South Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 REGIONAL ST AMADOR VALLEY BL REGIONAL ST & AMADOR VALLEY BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1502258 2015-08-11 12:29 Tuesday ARNOLD RD - DUBLIN BL 10' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 ARNOLD RD DUBLIN BLARNOLD RD & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1502360 2015-08-21 19:12 Friday CENTRAL PW - TASSAJARA RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Unsafe Starting or Backing Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 CENTRAL PW TASSAJARA RD CENTRAL PW & TASSAJARA RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1502467 2015-08-31 15:59 Monday VILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 0' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 2015 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR VILLAGE PW & BRIGHTON DR, Dublin, CA 2 0 D1502478 2015-09-01 11:07 Tuesday DUBLIN BL - AMADOR PLAZA RD 226' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 DUBLIN BL AMADOR PLAZA RD DUBLIN BL & AMADOR PLAZA RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1502560 2015-09-09 07:57 Wednesday GRAFTON ST - GLEASON DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2015 GRAFTON ST GLEASON DRGRAFTON ST & GLEASON DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1503570 2015-12-14 15:10 Monday GRAFTON ST - CAPOTERRA WY 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2015 GRAFTON ST CAPOTERRA WY GRAFTON ST & CAPOTERRA WY, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1600257 2016-01-27 08:28 Wednesday KOHNEN WY - SHELTON ST 255' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 KOHNEN WY SHELTON STKOHNEN WY & SHELTON ST, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1600466 2016-02-17 07:51 Wednesday VILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 667' Direction: North Daylight Cloudy Broadside Bicycle Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR VILLAGE PW & BRIGHTON DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1600987 2016-04-09 15:07 Saturday ARNOLD RD - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Cloudy Broadside Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoSevere Injury 2 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 ARNOLD RD DUBLIN BLARNOLD RD & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1601081 2016-04-18 17:54 Monday VILLAGE PW - DUBLIN BL 181' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 VILLAGE PW DUBLIN BLVILLAGE PW & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1601453 2016-05-27 08:06 Friday DUBLIN BL - CLARK AV 413' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV DUBLIN BL & CLARK AV, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1602413 2016-08-23 19:48 Tuesday CENTRAL PW - HACIENDA DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Other Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 CENTRAL PW HACIENDA DR CENTRAL PW & HACIENDA DR, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1602435 2016-08-25 20:55 Thursday CENTRAL PW - HACIENDA DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 CENTRAL PW HACIENDA DR CENTRAL PW & HACIENDA DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1602575 2016-09-07 13:18 Wednesday HASTINGS WY - VILLAGE PW 5' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 HASTINGS WY VILLAGE PWHASTINGS WY & VILLAGE PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1603410 2016-11-14 17:54 Monday DUBLIN BL - FALLON RD 0' Direction: Not Stated Dusk - Dawn Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 DUBLIN BL FALLON RDDUBLIN BL & FALLON RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1603859 2016-12-18 18:56 Sunday AMADOR VALLEY BL - VILLAGE PW 262' Direction: East Dark - No Street Lights Clear Other Bicycle Unsafe Lane Change Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2016 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PWAMADOR VALLEY BL & VILLAGE PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1603961 2016-12-27 11:35 Tuesday MARIPOSA CI - MARIPOSA LN (N) 16' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2016 MARIPOSA CI MARIPOSA LN (N) MARIPOSA CI & MARIPOSA LN (N), Dublin, CA 0 0 D1701223 2017-04-14 07:24 Friday PENN DR - LANCASTER RD 87' Direction: North Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 PENN DR LANCASTER RD PENN DR & LANCASTER RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1701352 2017-04-27 07:31 Thursday STAGECOACH RD - AMADOR VALLEY BL 11' Direction: South Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 STAGECOACH RD AMADOR VALLEY BL STAGECOACH RD & AMADOR VALLEY BL, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1701386 2017-04-29 10:58 Saturday DUBLIN BL - SIERRA CT 775' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 DUBLIN BL SIERRA CT DUBLIN BL & SIERRA CT, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1701587 2017-05-19 08:52 Friday VILLAGE PW - BRIGHTON DR 200' Direction: North Daylight Clear Rear-End Bicycle Brakes Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR VILLAGE PW & BRIGHTON DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1701708 2017-05-30 16:20 Tuesday VILLAGE PW - DAVONA DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 VILLAGE PW DAVONA DRVILLAGE PW & DAVONA DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1701872 2017-06-14 10:04 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - GLYNNIS ROSE DR 257' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 DUBLIN BL GLYNNIS ROSE DR DUBLIN BL & GLYNNIS ROSE DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1701951 2017-06-22 09:11 Thursday DUBLIN BL - SIERRA CT 520' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 DUBLIN BL SIERRA CT DUBLIN BL & SIERRA CT, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1702185 2017-07-11 18:17 Tuesday CLARK AV - DUBLIN BL 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 CLARK AV DUBLIN BLCLARK AV & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1703245 2017-10-05 08:30 Thursday ASPEN ST - SUMMER GLEN DR 5' Direction: South Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Unsafe SpeedHit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 ASPEN ST SUMMER GLEN DR ASPEN ST & SUMMER GLEN DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1704003 2017-12-06 15:31 Wednesday AMADOR VALLEY BL - VILLAGE PW 115' Direction: East Dusk - Dawn Clear Other Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2017 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PWAMADOR VALLEY BL & VILLAGE PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1704208 2017-12-21 09:58 Thursday DUBLIN BL - CLARK AV 560' Direction: East Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2017 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV DUBLIN BL & CLARK AV, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1800712 2018-02-19 07:44 Monday AMADOR VALLEY BL - REGIONAL ST 18' Direction: West Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 AMADOR VALLEY BL REGIONAL STAMADOR VALLEY BL & REGIONAL ST, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1801394 2018-04-11 21:30 Wednesday DUBLIN BL - AMADOR PLAZA RD 26' Direction: East Dark - Street Lights Raining Other Bicycle Traffic Signals and Signs Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 DUBLIN BL AMADOR PLAZA RD DUBLIN BL & AMADOR PLAZA RD, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1801564 2018-04-25 15:34 Wednesday VILLAGE PW - DUBLIN BL 193' Direction: North Daylight Clear Head-On Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 VILLAGE PW DUBLIN BLVILLAGE PW & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1802458 2018-07-06 21:54 Friday DUBLIN BL - SAN RAMON RD 363' Direction: West Dark - Street Lights Clear Rear-End Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 DUBLIN BL SAN RAMON RD DUBLIN BL & SAN RAMON RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1802730 2018-07-27 16:44 Friday DUBLIN BL - HACIENDA DR 303' Direction: West Daylight Clear Sideswipe Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 DUBLIN BL HACIENDA DR DUBLIN BL & HACIENDA DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1803532 2018-09-26 15:19 Wednesday VOMAC RD - SAN RAMON RD 2' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 VOMAC RDSAN RAMON RD VOMAC RD & SAN RAMON RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1803553 2018-09-28 08:01 Friday GLEASON DR - GRAFTON ST 7' Direction: East Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Traffic Signals and Signs Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2018 GLEASON DR GRAFTON STGLEASON DR & GRAFTON ST, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1804463 2018-12-11 08:19 Tuesday VALENTANO DR - FORINO DR 6' Direction: East Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Traffic Signals and Signs Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2018 VALENTANO DR FOINO DRVALENTANO DR & FORINO DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1900667 2019-02-20 13:13 Wednesday VILLAGE PW - TAMARACK DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Cloudy Broadside Bicycle Other Hazardous Movement Hit & Run: NoProperty Damage Only 0 # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 2019 VILLAGE PW TAMARACK DR VILLAGE PW & TAMARACK DR, Dublin, CA 0 0 D1901126 2019-03-24 12:16 Sunday AMADOR VALLEY BL - VILLAGE PW 212' Direction: West Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Improper Turning Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PWAMADOR VALLEY BL & VILLAGE PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1901652 2019-05-04 18:13 Saturday VILLAGE PW - TAMARACK DR 0' Direction: Not Stated Daylight Clear Other Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoComplaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 VILLAGE PW TAMARACK DR VILLAGE PW & TAMARACK DR, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1902063 2019-06-06 21:55 Thursday ASTERWOOD DR - REDWOOD AV 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Broadside Bicycle Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 ASTERWOOD DR REDWOOD AV ASTERWOOD DR & REDWOOD AV, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1903850 2019-10-24 07:23 Thursday IRONHORSE PW - DUBLIN BL 329' Direction: South Daylight Clear Broadside Bicycle Ped R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 IRONHORSE PW DUBLIN BLIRONHORSE PW & DUBLIN BL, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1904425 2019-12-08 18:10 Sunday FALLON RD - POSITANO PW 210' Direction: South Dark - Street Lights Clear Sideswipe Bicycle Unknown Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 FALLON RDPOSITANO PWFALLON RD & POSITANO PW, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1904431 2019-12-09 08:17 Monday AMADOR VALLEY BL - STAGECOACH RD 480' Direction: West Daylight Fog Sideswipe Bicycle Auto R/W Violation Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 AMADOR VALLEY BL STAGECOACH RD AMAOR VALLEY BL & STAGECOACH RD, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1904502 2019-12-13 18:11 Friday DUBLIN BL - VILLAGE 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Raining Broadside Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: NoOther Visible Injury 3 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 DUBLIN BL VILLAGE DUBLIN BL & VILLAGE, Dublin, CA 1 0 D1904624 2019-12-23 19:00 Monday DUBLIN BL - FALLON GATEWAY 0' Direction: Not Stated Dark - Street Lights Clear Broadside Bicycle Not Stated Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain 4 # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 2019 DUBLIN BL FALLON GATEWAY DUBLIN BL & FALLON GATEWAY, Dublin, CA 1 0 654
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan TIMS Collision Database Kittelson Associates, Inc.
CASE_ID
ACCIDENT_YEA
R PROC_DATE JURIS
COLLISION_DAT
E
COLLISION_TI
ME
OFFICER_
ID
REPORTI
NG_DIST
RICT
DAY_OF
_WEEK
CHP_SHIF
T
POPULAT
ION
CNTY_CIT
Y_LOC
SPECIAL_
COND
BEAT_TY
PE
CHP_BEA
T_TYPE
CITY_DIVI
SION_LA
PD
CHP_BEA
T_CLASS
BEAT_NU
MBER PRIMARY_RD SECONDARY_RD
DISTANC
E
DIRECTIO
N
INTERSEC
TION
WEATHE
R_1
WEATHE
R_2
STATE_H
WY_IND
CALTRAN
S_COUNT
Y
CALTRAN
S_DISTRI
CT
STATE_R
OUTE
ROUTE_S
UFFIX
POSTMIL
E_PREFIX
POSTMIL
E
LOCATIO
N_TYPE
RAMP_IN
TERSECTI
ON
SIDE_OF_
HWY
TOW_AW
AY
COLLISIO
N_SEVERI
TY
NUMBER
_KILLED
NUMBER
_INJURE
D
6363339 2014 6/11/2014 100 1/30/2014 1636 203174 322 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL BURTON ST 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 6397006 2014 10/13/2015 100 1/29/2014 833 203240 304 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU TAMARACK DR BURTON ST 100 W N A - N N 4 0 1 6423660 2014 6/24/2014 100 3/20/2014 1712 1 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BRODER BL MADIGAN RD 750 W N A - N N 4 0 1 6460407 2014 7/10/2014 100 4/2/2014 1333 202219 207 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL AMADOR PLAZA RD 4 W N B - N N 3 0 1 6475283 2014 7/24/2014 100 4/16/2014 1535 202219 406 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 HACIENDA DR CENTRAL PKWY 464 N N A - N N 3 0 1 6475287 2014 7/24/2014 100 4/23/2014 1006 100411 501 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 TASSAJARA RD DUBLIN BL 14 N N A - N N 3 0 1 6541933 2014 8/28/2014 100 7/26/2014 1656 202219 410 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL HIBERNIA DR 16 E N A - N N 3 0 1 6606255 2014 10/7/2014 100 7/30/2014 651 201242 408 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL ARNOLD RD 0 Y A - N Y 1 1 0 6646294 2014 10/10/2014 100 9/17/2014 954 202219 325 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 LOCUST PL WINEBERRY WY 336 N N A - N N 2 0 1 6646298 2014 10/10/2014 100 9/15/2014 723 100411 301 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY BRIGHTON DR 464 N N A - N N 3 0 1 6669800 2014 11/7/2014 100 9/26/2014 1042 201242 507 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BENT TREE DR TWIN EAGLES LN 10 S N A - N N 2 0 1 6679695 2014 1/28/2015 100 9/15/2014 758 203240 301 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR 3 N N A - N N 3 0 1 6684186 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/16/2014 1531 202219 0 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BRANNIGAN ST GLEASON DR 8 N N A - N N 3 0 1 6684190 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/17/2014 1137 201242 207 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL REGIONAL ST 348 E N A - N N 4 0 1 6684194 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/4/2014 10 202085 408 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ARNOLD RD DUBLIN BL 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 6691789 2014 11/20/2014 100 9/11/2014 1523 202219 322 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 LANCASTER RD UTICA CT 40 E N A - N N 3 0 1 6713339 2014 1/9/2015 100 11/7/2014 807 203633 507 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BENT TREE DR TWIN EAGLES LN 7 W N A - N N 3 0 1 6718683 2017 4/8/2019 100 12/20/2017 2040 224 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 HACIENDA DR RT 580 86 N N A - Y ALA 4 580 - - 18.001 R 4 W Y 1 1 0 6748044 2014 1/26/2015 100 11/22/2014 2109 203263 208 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU DUBLIN BL REGIONAL ST 0 Y B - N N 2 0 2 6759034 2014 1/26/2015 100 11/26/2014 1049 201242 308 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DARIAN CT BRIGHTON DR 7 W N A - N N 3 0 1 6776929 2014 2/12/2015 100 12/20/2014 1101 101974 0 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 256 E N B - N N 3 0 1 6858267 2015 4/2/2015 100 2/4/2015 1820 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SAN RAMON RD VOMAC RD 0 Y A - N N 2 0 1 6877336 2015 4/15/2015 100 3/25/2015 1451 201242 301 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR 660 N N A - N N 4 0 1 6892456 2015 4/30/2015 100 3/13/2015 1647 203271 1 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BRANNIGAN ST WHITWORTH DR 125 S N A - N N 3 0 1 6892458 2015 4/30/2015 100 3/23/2015 1214 100411 310 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY TAMARACK DR 16 S N A - N N 4 0 1 6895862 2015 5/22/2015 100 3/20/2015 844 202219 316 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 TAMARACK DR AMANDA ST 83 E N A - N N 4 0 2 6896523 2015 5/15/2015 100 4/6/2015 648 100411 410 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL HIBERNIA DR 10 W N A - N N 4 0 1 6896535 2015 5/15/2015 100 4/23/2015 1202 201242 411 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SIERRA LN DOUGHERTY RD 2 W N A - N N 3 0 1 6926041 2015 6/1/2015 100 5/7/2015 1123 201242 504 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY BRANNIGAN ST 13 E N B - N N 3 0 1 6978936 2015 7/7/2015 100 6/5/2015 1141 201242 210 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SAN RAMON RD DUBLIN BL 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 7002092 2015 7/22/2015 100 6/29/2015 850 202964 510 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 N DUBLIN RANCH DR OAK BLUFF LN 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 7038764 2015 9/3/2015 100 8/5/2015 1654 202219 207 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 REGIONAL ST AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 S - A - N N 3 0 1 7045238 2015 9/9/2015 100 8/15/2015 1304 206359 207 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 REGIONAL ST AMADOR VALLEY BL 13 S N A - N N 4 0 1 7047085 2015 9/19/2015 100 8/31/2015 1559 202219 301 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY BRIGHTON DR 0 N N A - N N 4 0 2 7057301 2015 11/13/2015 100 9/9/2015 757 100411 517 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 GRAFTON ST GLEASON DR 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 7064786 2015 9/22/2015 100 9/1/2015 1107 201242 207 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL AMADOR PLAZA RD 226 E N A - N N 3 0 1 7066429 2015 9/23/2015 100 8/21/2015 1912 201721 501 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY TASSAJARA RD 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 7123085 2015 12/2/2015 100 9/23/2015 825 100411 312 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW AMADOR VALLEY BL 229 S N A - N N 4 0 1 7132019 2015 12/9/2015 100 11/22/2015 1546 202964 310 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW TAMARACK DR 30 E N A - N N 4 0 1 7148992 2015 2/3/2016 100 12/14/2015 1510 202964 516 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 GRAFTON ST CAPOTERRA WY 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 7187881 2016 2/22/2016 100 1/27/2016 828 100411 515 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 KOHNEN WY SHELTON ST 255 W N A - N N 3 0 1 7199634 2016 9/25/2018 100 4/25/2016 2259 202219 408 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL DUBLIN BL ARNOLD RD 0 Y A - N Y 1 1 1 7207981 2016 3/21/2016 100 2/17/2016 751 202219 301 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR 667 N N B - N N 2 0 1 8000919 2016 3/30/2016 100 2/27/2016 1112 203271 207 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL AMADOR PLAZA RD 223 E N A - N N 4 0 1 8026971 2016 4/27/2016 100 4/19/2016 1331 202219 318 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8038919 2016 5/16/2016 100 4/9/2016 1507 202219 408 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ARNOLD RD DUBLIN BL 0 Y A - N Y 2 0 1 8040489 2016 5/19/2016 100 4/18/2016 1754 202964 312 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY DUBLIN BL 181 N N A - N N 3 0 1 8057436 2016 6/13/2016 100 5/27/2016 806 202219 320 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 413 E N A - N N 3 0 1 8082082 2016 7/15/2016 100 6/29/2016 2051 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VOMAC RD LANDALE AV 90 N N A - N Y 4 0 1 8089931 2016 10/20/2016 100 8/25/2016 2055 201730 412 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY HACIENDA DR 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8091427 2016 7/29/2016 100 7/13/2016 1010 202219 208 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL REGIONAL ST 26 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8092200 2016 8/3/2016 100 6/26/2016 948 201236 212 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SAN RAMON RD VOMAC RD 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8097043 2016 8/12/2016 100 7/1/2016 2331 201730 408 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ARNOLD RD DUBLIN BL 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8113234 2016 9/7/2016 100 8/13/2016 852 202219 207 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL STARWARD DR 81 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8148040 2016 10/18/2016 100 9/21/2016 1407 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU E CANTANA DR S SPAGE DR 0 N A - N N 3 0 1 8165468 2016 11/14/2016 100 11/6/2016 1700 203438 0 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL DUBLIN BL TASSAJARA RD 12 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8191866 2016 12/21/2016 100 11/14/2016 1754 202964 519 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL FALLON RD 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8205673 2016 1/13/2017 100 12/18/2016 1856 202964 313 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PW 262 E N A - N N 4 0 1 8316684 2017 3/6/2017 100 2/17/2017 1549 202219 203 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SHADOW DR SHADOW PL 150 W N C - N N 4 0 1 8358065 2017 5/2/2017 100 4/14/2017 724 202219 0 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 PENN DR LANCASTER RD 87 N N A - N N 3 0 1 8363793 2017 5/18/2017 100 4/29/2017 1058 202219 321 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL SIERRA CT 775 E N A - N N 3 0 1 8363809 2017 5/18/2017 100 4/27/2017 731 202219 314 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 STAGECOACH RD AMADOR VALLEY BL 11 S N A - N N 3 0 1 8386199 2017 7/11/2017 100 5/31/2017 1900 206805 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY TASSAJARA CREEK TRL 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8391055 2017 6/28/2017 100 5/30/2017 1620 203264 310 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY DAVONA DR 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8391063 2017 6/28/2017 100 5/19/2017 852 203264 301 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW BRIGHTON DR 200 N N A - N N 4 0 1 8399630 2017 7/31/2017 100 6/14/2017 1004 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL GLYNNIS ROSE DR 257 E N A - N N 3 0 1 8400056 2017 8/15/2017 100 6/13/2017 906 100411 412 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL HACIENDA DR DUBLIN BL 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8402990 2017 7/12/2017 100 6/22/2017 911 206730 321 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL SIERRA CT 520 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8403328 2017 7/12/2017 100 6/28/2017 1213 202219 416 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CAMPBELL LN DUBLIN BL 12 S N A - N N 4 0 1 8429817 2017 8/24/2017 100 7/11/2017 1817 207824 318 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8436902 2017 9/21/2017 100 9/2/2017 1839 206403 313 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY AMADOR VALLEY BL 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8457978 2017 10/9/2017 100 9/12/2017 803 100411 413 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY ASPEN ST 0 Y A - N N 3 0 2 8466761 2017 10/13/2017 100 8/30/2017 1858 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ROLLING HILLS DR WINDING TRAIL LN 0 Y A - N Y 2 0 2 8469845 2017 11/9/2017 100 8/19/2017 1619 207824 330 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 SUTTON LA CANTERBURY LN 102 S N A - N N 3 0 1 8477284 2017 10/24/2017 100 10/5/2017 830 203264 400 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ASPEN ST SUMMER GLEN DR 5 S N A - N N 4 0 1 8489136 2017 12/4/2017 100 10/18/2017 932 100411 413 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY ASPEN ST 0 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8494507 2017 11/27/2017 100 9/28/2017 1758 207353 511 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ANTONE WY GRAFTON ST 11 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8508852 2017 12/12/2017 100 11/21/2017 1340 202219 208 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL GOLDEN GATE DR 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8512807 2017 1/29/2018 100 12/6/2017 1531 202219 313 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PW 115 E N A - N N 3 0 1 8538927 2017 1/30/2018 100 12/4/2017 1550 100411 301 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 BRIGHTON DR CALLAN ST 342 E N A - N N 4 0 1 8539371 2018 2/1/2018 100 1/5/2018 611 207519 507 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 TWIN EAGLES WAYS BENT TREE DR 9 N N A - N N 4 0 1 8540665 2017 1/27/2018 100 12/21/2017 958 100411 324 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 560 E N A - N N 4 0 1 8542669 2018 2/5/2018 100 1/12/2018 1656 203253 414 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU DUBLIN BL GLYNNIS ROSE DR 0 Y A - N N 3 0 2 8560839 2018 3/13/2018 100 2/10/2018 1247 202219 0 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALU FALLON RD DUBLIN BL 544 S N A - N N 4 0 1 8584261 2018 3/29/2018 100 2/19/2018 744 103202 207 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL REGIONAL ST 18 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8584284 2018 4/5/2018 100 3/5/2018 818 400411 0 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 PALERMO WY LOCKHART ST 8 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8613829 2018 4/24/2018 100 4/3/2018 1653 203628 0 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL DUBLIN BL GOLDEN GATE DR 498 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8621657 2018 5/29/2018 100 4/25/2018 1534 203264 312 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PW DUBLIN BL 193 N N A - N N 4 0 1 8625261 2018 5/30/2018 100 5/9/2018 1435 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL CENTRAL PKWY LEE THOMPSON WY 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8668416 2018 8/7/2018 100 7/10/2018 1247 100411 318 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL DUBLIN BL CLARK AV 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8679053 2018 8/30/2018 100 7/27/2018 1644 202219 410 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL HACIENDA DR 303 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8690884 2018 9/25/2018 100 8/27/2018 1714 104423 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NOVALE TASSAJARA RD DUBLIN BL 708 N N A - N N 3 0 1 8719717 2018 10/23/2018 100 9/26/2018 1519 202219 212 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 W VOMAC RD SAN RAMON RD 2 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8733346 2018 12/4/2018 100 10/31/2018 844 202219 0 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL DUBLIN CT 0 Y A - N N 2 0 1 8735999 2019 4/15/2019 100 3/2/2019 1834 207524 410 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 HIBERNIA DR DUBLIN BL 243 S N C - N N 4 0 1 8741775 2018 11/30/2018 100 11/15/2018 826 100411 0 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL GLEASON DR FALLON RD 175 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8753320 2018 1/28/2019 100 12/13/2018 1528 202219 322 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL BURTON ST 10 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8757540 2018 12/20/2018 100 11/29/2018 1512 100411 305 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DAVONA DR DAVONA LN 446 E N B - N N 3 0 1 8763057 2018 12/27/2018 100 12/11/2018 819 201242 507 2 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VALENTANO DR URBINO ST 6 E N A - N N 3 0 1 8810265 2019 3/18/2019 100 2/20/2019 1313 201242 320 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY TAMARACK DR 0 Y B - N N 3 0 1 8831308 2019 4/4/2019 100 3/24/2019 1216 201242 221 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL VILLAGE PW 212 W N A - N N 4 0 1 8834345 2019 4/12/2019 100 3/27/2019 654 100411 416 3 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 NO VAL DEMARCUS BL DUBLIN BL 356 S N A - N N 4 0 1 8870236 2019 6/5/2019 100 5/4/2019 1813 210672 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE PKWY TAMARACK DR 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1 8888013 2019 7/16/2019 100 6/6/2019 2155 207525 0 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 ASTERWOOD DR REDWOOD AV 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8950388 2019 11/7/2019 100 9/23/2019 646 100411 509 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL PKWY LEE THOMPSON ST 0 Y A - N N 4 0 1 8951142 2019 11/6/2019 100 9/21/2019 1939 207519 410 6 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL MYRTLE DR 39 W N A - N N 3 0 1 8971125 2019 11/14/2019 100 10/24/2019 723 203264 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 IRON HORSE PKWY DUBLIN BL 329 S N A - N N 4 0 1 8991040 2019 1/15/2020 100 11/21/2019 926 203264 0 4 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 GOLDEN GATE DR ST PATRICK DR 376 S N A - N N 4 0 1 9010818 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/13/2019 1811 209766 320 5 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL VILLAGE PKWY 0 Y B C N N 4 0 1 9010822 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/8/2019 1810 202964 502 7 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 FALLON RD POSITANO PKWY 210 S N A - N N 3 0 1 9010826 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/2/2019 1051 211122 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 IRON HORSE PKWY MARTINELLI 71 S N C - N N 3 0 1 9010867 2019 2/14/2020 100 12/9/2019 817 201242 0 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 AMADOR VALLEY BL STAGECOACH RD 480 W N E - N N 4 0 1 9028077 2019 2/5/2020 100 12/23/2019 1900 201998 0 1 5 4 198 0 0 0 0 DUBLIN BL FALLON GATEWAY 0 Y A - N N 3 0 1
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan TIMS Collision Database Kittelson Associates, Inc.
CASE_ID
ACCIDENT_YEA
R PROC_DATE JURIS
COLLISION_DAT
E
COLLISION_TI
ME
6363339 2014 6/11/2014 100 1/30/2014 1636
6397006 2014 10/13/2015 100 1/29/2014 833
6423660 2014 6/24/2014 100 3/20/2014 1712
6460407 2014 7/10/2014 100 4/2/2014 1333
6475283 2014 7/24/2014 100 4/16/2014 1535
6475287 2014 7/24/2014 100 4/23/2014 1006
6541933 2014 8/28/2014 100 7/26/2014 1656
6606255 2014 10/7/2014 100 7/30/2014 651
6646294 2014 10/10/2014 100 9/17/2014 954
6646298 2014 10/10/2014 100 9/15/2014 723
6669800 2014 11/7/2014 100 9/26/2014 1042
6679695 2014 1/28/2015 100 9/15/2014 758
6684186 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/16/2014 1531
6684190 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/17/2014 1137
6684194 2014 12/19/2014 100 10/4/2014 10
6691789 2014 11/20/2014 100 9/11/2014 1523
6713339 2014 1/9/2015 100 11/7/2014 807
6718683 2017 4/8/2019 100 12/20/2017 2040
6748044 2014 1/26/2015 100 11/22/2014 2109
6759034 2014 1/26/2015 100 11/26/2014 1049
6776929 2014 2/12/2015 100 12/20/2014 1101
6858267 2015 4/2/2015 100 2/4/2015 1820
6877336 2015 4/15/2015 100 3/25/2015 1451
6892456 2015 4/30/2015 100 3/13/2015 1647
6892458 2015 4/30/2015 100 3/23/2015 1214
6895862 2015 5/22/2015 100 3/20/2015 844
6896523 2015 5/15/2015 100 4/6/2015 648
6896535 2015 5/15/2015 100 4/23/2015 1202
6926041 2015 6/1/2015 100 5/7/2015 1123
6978936 2015 7/7/2015 100 6/5/2015 1141
7002092 2015 7/22/2015 100 6/29/2015 850
7038764 2015 9/3/2015 100 8/5/2015 1654
7045238 2015 9/9/2015 100 8/15/2015 1304
7047085 2015 9/19/2015 100 8/31/2015 1559
7057301 2015 11/13/2015 100 9/9/2015 757
7064786 2015 9/22/2015 100 9/1/2015 1107
7066429 2015 9/23/2015 100 8/21/2015 1912
7123085 2015 12/2/2015 100 9/23/2015 825
7132019 2015 12/9/2015 100 11/22/2015 1546
7148992 2015 2/3/2016 100 12/14/2015 1510
7187881 2016 2/22/2016 100 1/27/2016 828
7199634 2016 9/25/2018 100 4/25/2016 2259
7207981 2016 3/21/2016 100 2/17/2016 751
8000919 2016 3/30/2016 100 2/27/2016 1112
8026971 2016 4/27/2016 100 4/19/2016 1331
8038919 2016 5/16/2016 100 4/9/2016 1507
8040489 2016 5/19/2016 100 4/18/2016 1754
8057436 2016 6/13/2016 100 5/27/2016 806
8082082 2016 7/15/2016 100 6/29/2016 2051
8089931 2016 10/20/2016 100 8/25/2016 2055
8091427 2016 7/29/2016 100 7/13/2016 1010
8092200 2016 8/3/2016 100 6/26/2016 948
8097043 2016 8/12/2016 100 7/1/2016 2331
8113234 2016 9/7/2016 100 8/13/2016 852
8148040 2016 10/18/2016 100 9/21/2016 1407
8165468 2016 11/14/2016 100 11/6/2016 1700
8191866 2016 12/21/2016 100 11/14/2016 1754
8205673 2016 1/13/2017 100 12/18/2016 1856
8316684 2017 3/6/2017 100 2/17/2017 1549
8358065 2017 5/2/2017 100 4/14/2017 724
8363793 2017 5/18/2017 100 4/29/2017 1058
8363809 2017 5/18/2017 100 4/27/2017 731
8386199 2017 7/11/2017 100 5/31/2017 1900
8391055 2017 6/28/2017 100 5/30/2017 1620
8391063 2017 6/28/2017 100 5/19/2017 852
8399630 2017 7/31/2017 100 6/14/2017 1004
8400056 2017 8/15/2017 100 6/13/2017 906
8402990 2017 7/12/2017 100 6/22/2017 911
8403328 2017 7/12/2017 100 6/28/2017 1213
8429817 2017 8/24/2017 100 7/11/2017 1817
8436902 2017 9/21/2017 100 9/2/2017 1839
8457978 2017 10/9/2017 100 9/12/2017 803
8466761 2017 10/13/2017 100 8/30/2017 1858
8469845 2017 11/9/2017 100 8/19/2017 1619
8477284 2017 10/24/2017 100 10/5/2017 830
8489136 2017 12/4/2017 100 10/18/2017 932
8494507 2017 11/27/2017 100 9/28/2017 1758
8508852 2017 12/12/2017 100 11/21/2017 1340
8512807 2017 1/29/2018 100 12/6/2017 1531
8538927 2017 1/30/2018 100 12/4/2017 1550
8539371 2018 2/1/2018 100 1/5/2018 611
8540665 2017 1/27/2018 100 12/21/2017 958
8542669 2018 2/5/2018 100 1/12/2018 1656
8560839 2018 3/13/2018 100 2/10/2018 1247
8584261 2018 3/29/2018 100 2/19/2018 744
8584284 2018 4/5/2018 100 3/5/2018 818
8613829 2018 4/24/2018 100 4/3/2018 1653
8621657 2018 5/29/2018 100 4/25/2018 1534
8625261 2018 5/30/2018 100 5/9/2018 1435
8668416 2018 8/7/2018 100 7/10/2018 1247
8679053 2018 8/30/2018 100 7/27/2018 1644
8690884 2018 9/25/2018 100 8/27/2018 1714
8719717 2018 10/23/2018 100 9/26/2018 1519
8733346 2018 12/4/2018 100 10/31/2018 844
8735999 2019 4/15/2019 100 3/2/2019 1834
8741775 2018 11/30/2018 100 11/15/2018 826
8753320 2018 1/28/2019 100 12/13/2018 1528
8757540 2018 12/20/2018 100 11/29/2018 1512
8763057 2018 12/27/2018 100 12/11/2018 819
8810265 2019 3/18/2019 100 2/20/2019 1313
8831308 2019 4/4/2019 100 3/24/2019 1216
8834345 2019 4/12/2019 100 3/27/2019 654
8870236 2019 6/5/2019 100 5/4/2019 1813
8888013 2019 7/16/2019 100 6/6/2019 2155
8950388 2019 11/7/2019 100 9/23/2019 646
8951142 2019 11/6/2019 100 9/21/2019 1939
8971125 2019 11/14/2019 100 10/24/2019 723
8991040 2019 1/15/2020 100 11/21/2019 926
9010818 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/13/2019 1811
9010822 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/8/2019 1810
9010826 2019 2/15/2020 100 12/2/2019 1051
9010867 2019 2/14/2020 100 12/9/2019 817
9028077 2019 2/5/2020 100 12/23/2019 1900
PARTY_C
OUNT
PRIMARY
_COLL_FA
CTOR
PCF_COD
E_OF_VI
OL
PCF_VIOL
_CATEGO
RY
PCF_VIOL
ATION
PCF_VIOL
_SUBSEC
TION
HIT_AND
_RUN
TYPE_OF
_COLLISI
ON MVIW
PED_ACTI
ON
ROAD_SU
RFACE
ROAD_C
OND_1
ROAD_C
OND_2 LIGHTING
CONTROL
_DEVICE
CHP_ROA
D_TYPE
PEDESTRI
AN_ACCI
DENT
BICYCLE_
ACCIDEN
T
MOTORC
YCLE_AC
CIDENT
TRUCK_A
CCIDENT
NOT_PRI
VATE_PR
OPERTY
ALCOHOL
_INVOLV
ED
STWD_VE
HTYPE_A
T_FAULT
CHP_VEH
TYPE_AT
_FAULT
COUNT_S
EVERE_IN
J
COUNT_V
ISIBLE_IN
J
COUNT_C
OMPLAIN
T_PAIN
COUNT_P
ED_KILLE
D
COUNT_P
ED_INJU
RED
COUNT_B
ICYCLIST_
KILLED
COUNT_B
ICYCLIST_
INJURED
COUNT_
MC_KILLE
D
COUNT_
MC_INJU
RED
PRIMARY
_RAMP
SECONDA
RY_RAM
P LATITUDE
LONGITU
DE COUNTY CITY POINT_X POINT_Y
2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y D 22 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.921 37.71352 1 A - 10 21952 M G B A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.923 37.71467 2 A - 21 22106 N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y D 22 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - 37.7159 -121.806 ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.886 37.71591 2 A - 10 21952 N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.928 37.70488 2 A - 12 22450 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y - 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.888 37.70993 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.872 37.70579 2 A - 12 21453 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.885 37.7063 2 A - 12 21453 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.893 37.70623 2 A - 11 21950 B N G B D A H - A D 0 Y Y N 60 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.926 37.72436 2 A - 8 22107 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71979 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.853 37.71639 2 A - 10 21950 C F G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y - 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71853 1 B - 22 N E I A A H - A D 0 Y Y - - 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.869 37.71264 2 A - 9 21804 A N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.934 37.70671 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - C A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.893 37.70623 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.92 37.71208 2 A - 8 22107 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.853 37.71639 2 A - 11 21955 N G B E A H - E A 0 Y Y N 60 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 - WF ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.873 37.7016 3 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - C A 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.934 37.70292 1 A - 3 22350 N E I A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.922 37.71821 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y D 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.919 37.70517 2 A - 0 2818 N G B E A G - C A 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.941 37.71728 2 A - 9 21804 A N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.72033 2 A - 6 21750 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.869 37.70884 2 A - 5 21202 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71485 3 D - 0 N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y - - 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.923 37.71466 2 A - 8 22107 N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.885 37.7063 2 A - 5 21650 1 N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.91 37.70654 2 A - 12 21453 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.869 37.70978 2 A - 9 21453 B N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.936 37.70206 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.865 37.71994 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.935 37.7061 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.935 37.70607 3 A - 9 21804 A M H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71852 2 A - 17 21451 A N D G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.864 37.71365 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.70511 2 A - 21 22106 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.872 37.70981 2 A - 9 21804 A N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.70964 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71489 2 A - 9 21804 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.867 37.71489 3 A - 0 21456 1 N G B B A H - C A 0 Y Y N 60 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.893 37.70623 2 A - 10 21952 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.72035 2 A - 8 21717 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.93 37.70927 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.92 37.70537 2 A - 17 21451 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.893 37.70623 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.924 37.70644 2 A - 9 21801 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.919 37.70504 2 A - 8 22107 F E I F A H - D D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.936 37.71334 2 A - 9 21453 B N H G A A H - C A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.888 37.70866 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.934 37.7029 2 A - 0 23250 N H - A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.941 37.71728 2 A - 0 21456 1 N G B B A H - C A 0 Y Y N 60 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.893 37.70623 3 A - 3 22350 N C C A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.934 37.70763 2 D - 0 N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y - - 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN 2 A - 10 21950 A F G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.872 37.70575 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - B A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.851 37.70677 2 A - 7 21658 A N H G A A H - D D 0 Y Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.926 37.71048 2 A - 21 22106 N G B E B H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.941 37.70442 2 A - 8 22107 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.919 37.71333 2 A - 8 22107 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.914 37.70381 2 A - 5 21650 1 N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.916 37.71677 2 D - 0 N H G A A H - B A 0 Y Y - - 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN 2 A - 9 21453 C N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.72194 2 A - 3 22350 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71907 2 A - 5 21650 1 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.874 37.70574 2 A - 6 21951 F G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.888 37.70617 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y D 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.918 37.70484 3 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.902 37.70576 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.92 37.70537 2 A - 11 21950 B N G B B A H - B A 0 Y Y N 60 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71021 3 A - 3 22350 N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y D 22 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.883 37.70865 3 A - 3 22350 N G B D A H - B D 0 Y Y A 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.947 37.70687 2 A - 9 21804 A N G B D A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN 2 A - 3 22350 N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.883 37.71085 2 A - 11 21950 B N G B C A H - A D 0 Y Y N 60 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.883 37.70865 2 A - 3 22350 N G B B A H - B D 0 Y Y A 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.864 37.71789 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.929 37.70425 2 A - 5 21202 A N H G A A H - B D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71033 2 A - 21 22106 N G B F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.924 37.7184 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - C D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.853 37.71642 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y Y A 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.918 37.70492 3 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.875 37.70574 1 C - 18 N F A A A B - A D 0 Y Y - - 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.851 37.70528 2 A - 9 21804 A N H G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.935 37.70608 2 A - - N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y A 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.857 37.71305 1 B - 22 N E I A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.931 37.70374 2 A - 5 21650 1 N H G A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.924 37.70647 2 A - 12 21453 A F G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.86 37.70851 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.92 37.70537 2 A - 8 22107 N B G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.889 37.70618 2 A - 11 21950 B N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y N 60 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.872 37.7077 2 A - 9 21453 B N D G A A H - A A 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.941 37.71725 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - B A 0 Y Y A 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.912 37.70372 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B B H - C D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.885 37.70563 1 B - 22 N H A A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.857 37.71582 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.921 37.7135 2 A - 11 21954 A N G B D B H - A D 0 Y Y N 60 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.937 37.72307 2 A - 12 22450 A N D G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.848 37.72421 2 A - 5 21202 A N D G A A H - A A 0 Y Y L 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71489 2 A - 8 22107 N D G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.928 37.71001 2 A - 10 21952 N D J F A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.9 37.70481 3 A - 10 21950 N H G B A H - A A 0 Y Y Y A 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.927 37.71489 2 A - 10 21950 A N D G A A H - C D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.883 37.7127 2 A - 10 21950 A N G B B A H - A A 0 Y Y A 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.86 37.70851 2 A - 11 21955 N G B D A H - C A 0 Y Y Y N 60 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.882 37.70603 2 A - 10 21950 A N D G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.897 37.70541 2 A - 5 21651 B N D C A A H - A D 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.928 37.70161 2 A - 5 21650 1 N D G A B H - C A 0 Y Y L 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.924 37.70603 2 D - 0 F B G A A H - C D 0 Y Y - - 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.852 37.71346 2 D - 0 F G B B B H - A D 0 Y Y Y - - 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.897 37.70403 2 A - 9 21801 A N B G A A H - A D 0 Y Y A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.917 37.71602 2 A - 0 20001 A N D G A A H - C A 0 Y Y A 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - - ALAMEDA DUBLIN -121.851 37.70677
Attachment C: Descriptive Statistics Tables
657
Bicycle Collision Descriptive Statistics Kittelson Associates, Inc.
Dublin Bike Collisions -- 2014-2019
Year Count Percent
2014 17 25%
2015 12 18%
2016 11 16%
2017 11 16%
2018 8 12%
2019 9 13%
Day Count Percent
Monday 11
Tuesday 9
Wednesday 17
Thursday 12
Friday 11
Saturday 5
Sunday 3
Time Count Percent
6AM to 10AM 21 31%
10AM to 4PM 23 34%
4PM to 8PM 20 29%
8PM to 6AM 4 6%
Severity Count Percent
Fatal 1 1%
Severe Injury 2 3%
Other Visible Injury 23 34%
Complaint of Pain 18 26%
Property Damage Only 24 35%
Collisions by Lighting and Severity
Lighting Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share of Total Dark - No Street Lights 1 1 1%
Dark - Street Lights 3 3 3 9 13%
Daylight 1 2 18 14 20 55 81%
Dusk - Dawn 1 1 1 3 4%
Grand Total 1 2 23 18 24 68 100%
Type Count Percent
Felony 3
Misdemanor 0
Not Hit and Run 65 96%
Intersection/Segment and Collision Severity
Injury Degree Intersection Segment Grand Total
Fatal 1 1
Severe Injury 1 1 2
Other Visible Injury 16 7 23
Complaint of Pain 14 4 18
Property Damage Only 20 4 24
Grand Total 52 16 68
Share of Total 76% 24% 100%
Primary Collision Factor and Collision Severity
PCF Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share of Total Auto R/W Violation 1 8 2 7 18 26%
Not Stated 2 6 3 11 16%
Improper Turning 4 2 5 11 16%
Other Hazardous Movement 1 2 3 2 8 12%
Unknown 2 2 4 6%
Traffic Signals and Signs 2 2 4 6%
Ped R/W Violation 1 2 3 4%
Unsafe Speed 2 2 3%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 1 1 2 3%
Other 2 2 3%
Unsafe Lane Change 1 1 1%
Brakes 1 1 1%
Improper Passing 1 1 1%
Grand Total 1 2 23 18 24 68 100%
Age and Severity
Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Injury Property Damage Only Total
Share among
Reported
Dublin
Population
Share
Under 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 8%
5-14 years old 0 1 5 3 6 15 29% 16%
15-24 years old 0 0 9 2 2 13 25% 8%
25-44 years old 1 0 6 6 3 16 31% 35%
45-64 years old 0 1 2 3 0 6 12% 25%
65+ years old 0 0 1 0 1 2 4% 9%
Not Reported 0 0 0 4 12 16 -
Total 1 2 23 18 24 68
Reported:
Gender and Severity
Gender Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share among
Reported
2 9 11
Female 1 5 1 2 9 17%
Male 1 1 18 13 11 44 83%
Not Stated 2 2 4
Grand Total 1 2 23 18 24 68
Hit and Run Collisions
4%
Collisions by Year
Collisions by Day of Week
72%
28%
Collisions by Time of Day
Collisions by Severity
658
Pedestrian Collision Descriptive Statistics Kittelson Associates, Inc.
Dublin Pedestrian Collisions -- 2014-2019
Year Count Percent
2014 12 15%
2015 13 16%
2016 10 12%
2017 13 16%
2018 18 22%
2019 15 19%
Day Count Percent
Monday 13
Tuesday 7
Wednesday 20
Thursday 6
Friday 13
Saturday 12
Sunday 9
Time Count Percent
6AM to 10AM 16 20%
10AM to 4PM 38 47%
4PM to 8PM 20 25%
8PM to 6AM 7 9%
Severity Count Percent
Fatal 3 4%
Severe Injury 9 11%
Other Visible Injury 31 38%
Complaint of Pain 20 25%
Property Damage Only 18 22%
Collisions by Lighting and Severity
Lighting Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share of Total Dark - Street Lights 1 2 5 2 1 11 14%
Dark - Street Lights Not Functioning 1 1 1%
Daylight 1 4 26 16 15 62 77%
Dusk - Dawn 2 2 2 6 7%
(blank) 1 1 1%
Grand Total 3 9 31 20 18 81 100%
Collisions by Intersection/Segment and Severity
Injury Degree Intersection Segment Grand Total
Fatal 3 3
Severe Injury 8 1 9
Other Visible Injury 30 1 31
Complaint of Pain 17 3 20
Property Damage Only 16 2 18
Grand Total 74 7 81
Share of Total 91% 9% 100%
Collisions by Primary Collision Factor and Severity
PCF Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share of Total Ped R/W Violation 2 13 2 5 22 27%
Other Improper Driving 1 1 6 2 6 16 20%
Unknown 1 4 4 2 11 14%
Auto R/W Violation 3 4 4 11 14%
Pedestrian Violation 4 1 5 6%
Not Stated 1 1 1 1 4 5%
Unsafe Speed 1 1 1 3 4%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 3 3 4%
Other Hazardous Movement 1 1 2 2%
Traffic Signals and Signs 1 1 1%
Improper Turning 1 1 1%
Improper Passing 1 1 1%
Pedestrian Violatoin 1 1 1%
Grand Total 3 9 31 20 18 81 100%
Collisions by Age and Severity
Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share among
reported
Dublin
Population
Share
Under 5 0 1 2 3 4 10 18% 8%
5-14 years old 0 1 5 3 0 9 16% 16%
15-24 years old 0 1 3 5 1 10 18% 8%
25-44 years old 1 1 6 1 1 10 18% 35%
45-64 years old 1 0 3 1 2 7 12% 25%
65+ years old 0 3 4 3 1 11 19% 9%
Not Reported/other 1 3 10 7 13 34
Total 3 10 33 23 22 91
Reported 63%
Collisions by Gender and Severity
Gender Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain Property Damage Only Grand Total Share among
reported
1 2 10 7 13 33
F 1 5 8 3 2 19 40%
M 1 2 13 10 3 29 60%
Grand Total 3 9 31 20 18 81
Reported 59%
Collisions by Severity
Crashes by Year
Collisions by Day of Week
58%
43%
Collisions by Time of Day
659
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
EXISTING
CONDITIONS:
LEVEL OF TRAFFIC
STRESS ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B
660
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\Task 3 - Baseline Conditions & Needs Assessment\3.3.3 LTS Analysis\Methodology Memo\Draft 3 to City\24392_LTS Methodology Assumptions and Results Memo_20200715.docx
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Level of Traffic Stress Methodology, Assumptions, and Results Date: July 15, 2020 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
From: Mike Alston, RSP; Amanda Leahy, AICP; Erin Ferguson, PE, RSP; Michael Sahimi, AICP The City of Dublin (City) is updating the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Plan). The Plan will serve as a comprehensive action plan for the City to provide improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities for its residents, employees, and visitors. As part of the baseline conditions and needs assessment, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) is analyzing the bicyclist level of traffic stress (LTS) on the City’s existing roadway network (“on-street LTS”)and on the Class I path network (“path LTS”).
This memorandum (memo) details the methodology and assumptions used in the on-street LTS analysis for the existing roadway network and the results of the on-street LTS and path LTS analyses. The path LTS methodology and assumptions are included as Attachment A. The memo is organized into the following sections:
Background
Methodology
Available Data and Assumptions
Existing Conditions LTS Results
Map Results
Attachment A: Class I Path LTS Methodology
BACKGROUND
The on-street LTS methodology used was developed by the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) and documented in the Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity report published in 2012;1 it was further refined by Dr. Peter Furth of Northeastern University in 2017.2 The on-street LTS measure is a rating given to a road segment or crossing indicating the traffic stress it imposes on bicyclists. It classifies road segments and intersections as one of four levels of traffic stress:
LTS 1: Requires little attention to surroundings; suitable for most children 1 Mekuria, Mazza C., “Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity” (2012). All Mineta Transportation Institute Publications. Book 4. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_all/4 2 The methodology is posted at http://www.northeastern.edu/peter.furth/criteria-for-level-of-traffic-stress/. This methodology is “Version 2.0,” published in June 2017.
661
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
LTS 2: Low traffic stress; suitable for most adults
LTS 3: Moderate traffic stress for all bicyclists
LTS 4: High stress; only suitable for experienced bicyclists The on-street LTS methodology has recently been used by agencies such as Alameda CTC and the City of Oakland to assess bicycling conditions and is a best practice methodology for assessing these conditions in the transportation planning profession.
This memo describes the on-street LTS methodology implemented based on the versions developed in 2012 and updated in 2017.
METHODOLOGY
The on-street LTS methodology includes criteria for establishing the score along roadway segments as well as at intersections and crossings, since the features of a signalized or unsignalized intersection can also have an impact on bicyclist comfort along a path or roadway. This section outlines the methodologies and criteria for both facilities.
Roadway Segment LTS Methodology
The on-street LTS methodology for roadway segments provides criteria for the following three bicycle facility types:3
Bike lanes alongside a parking lane
Bike lanes not alongside a parking lane
Mixed traffic (i.e., no bike lanes present).
Note that under this methodology, Class III bicycle routes are analyzed under the criteria for mixed traffic. In addition, physically separated Class I and Class IV bikeway segments (including parkingseparated bike lanes) are always scored the lowest level of traffic stress between intersections, LTS 1.
Under the Furth on-street methodology, Class I and IV bikeways are assumed to have the lowest level of stress since bicyclists are separated from interacting with vehicles. This analysis instead applies path LTS scores based on separate evaluation metrics for Class I paths. (See the next section, Path LTS, for discussion of Class I path LTS within the City.)
The methodology evaluation criteria for each of the three facility types are shown in Table 1 through Table 3. These criteria operate following the “weakest link” principle, where the criterion with the 3 Bikeways can generally be classified as:
Class I: off-street bicycle-only or multi-use path
Class II: on-street bicycle lanes (can also include painted buffer) Class III: signed on-street bicycle route
Class IV: physically-separated or protected on-street bike lanes 662
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
highest (worst) LTS determines the stress level of the segment. For example, if the bike lane width matches the values associated with LTS 1 but the speed limit indicates LTS 3, the segment would be considered to be LTS 3.
Table 1: Roadway Segment Criteria for Bike Lanes Alongside a Parking Lane Number of Vehicle Prevailing Speed
Lanes
Bike Lane Reach (Bike
plus parking lane width) ≤ 25 mph 30 mph 35 mph
15+ ft LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 3
1 lane per direction
12-14 ft LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3
2 lanes per direction (2-
way) LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3
2-3 lanes per direction
(1-way)
15+ ft
LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3
other multilane LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3
Notes:
1. Bike lane reach = Bike + Parking Lane Width.
2. If bike lane is frequently blocked, use mixed traffic criteria.
3. Qualifying bike lane must have reach (bike lane width + parking lane width) ≥ 12 ft.
4. Bike lane width includes any marked buffer next to the bike lane.
Source: Peter Furth, Northeastern University, http://www.northeastern.edu/peter.furth/criteria-for-level-of-traffic-stress/ Table 2: Road Segment Criteria for Bike Lanes and Shoulders Not Adjacent to a Parking Lane Prevailing Speed Number of Vehicle
Lanes
Bike Lane
Width ≤ 25
mph 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph 45 mph 50+ mph
1 thru lane per 6+ ft LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS3 LTS 3 direction, or no
striped centerline 4 or 5 ft LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 6+ ft LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 2 thru lanes per direction 4 or 5 ft LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 3+ lanes per direction Any width LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 Notes:
1. If bike lane / shoulder is frequently blocked, used mixed traffic criteria.
2. Qualifying bike lane / shoulder should extend at least 4 ft from a curb and at least 3.5 ft from a pavement edge or discontinuous gutter pan seam.
3. Bike lane width includes any marked buffer next to the bike lane.
Source: Peter Furth, Northeastern University, http://www.northeastern.edu/peter.furth/criteria-for-level-of-traffic-stress/ 663
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 3: Road Segment Criteria for Level of Traffic Stress in Mixed Traffic Prevailing Speed
Number of Lanes
Effective
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
≤ 20
mph
25 mph
30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
45 mph
50+
mph
0-750 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3
751-1500 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4
1501-3000 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
2-way street with no
striped centerline
3000+ LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
0-750 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3
751-1500 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4
1501-3000 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
1 thru lane per direction
(1-way, 1-lane street or
2-way street with
centerline)
3000+ LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
0-8000 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 2 thru lanes per direction 8001+ LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 3+ thru lanes per
direction Any ADT LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 Note: Effective ADT = ADT for two-way roads; Effective ADT = 1.5*ADT for one-way roads.
Source: Peter Furth, Northeastern University, http://www.northeastern.edu/peter.furth/criteria-for-level-of-traffic-stress/ Crossing LTS Methodology
Kittelson conducted LTS intersection crossing analysis for street or path intersections that are located along a link that is scored LTS 3 or 4 (i.e., high-stress facilities), since it is likely that the characteristics of a high-stress segment can affect the bicyclist experience when crossing from a low-stress street. The crossing methodology analyzes intersections and crossings for the following situations:
Intersection approaches for pocket bike lanes (defined as a bike lane that is to the left of a dedicated right-turn vehicle lane)
Intersection approaches for mixed traffic in the presence of right-turn lanes Intersection crossings for unsignalized crossings without a median refuge Intersection crossings for unsignalized crossings with a median refuge The list above is provided by the Furth methodology and does not describe all circumstances. In Dublin, many Class I facilities cross at signalized intersections. See the next section, Path LTS, for a discussion of this topic.
Under the Furth methodology, the LTS at an approach is graded from LTS 1 through LTS 4 based on the criteria outlined in Table 4 through Table 7.
664
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 4: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria for Pocket Bike Lanes Configuration Level of Traffic Stress
Single right-turn lane up to 150 ft. long, starting abruptly while the bike lane continues straight, and having an intersection angle and curb radius such that turning speed is < 15 mph.
LTS ≥ 2
Single right-turn lane longer than 150 ft. starting abruptly while the bike lane continues straight, and having an intersection angle and curb radius such that vehicle turning speed is < 20 mph.
LTS ≥ 3
Single right-turn lane in which the bike lane shifts to the left, but the intersection angle and curb radius are such that turning speed is < 15 mph. LTS ≥ 3 Single right-turn lane with any other configuration; dual right-turn lanes; or right-turn lane along with an option (through-right) lane. LTS ≥ 4 Source: Mekuria, Maaza. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity, Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012.
Table 5: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria for Mixed Traffic in the Presence of a Right-Turn Lane Configuration Level of Traffic Stress
Single right-turn lane with length < 75 ft. and intersection angle and curb radius limit turning
speed to 15 mph.
(no effect on LTS)
Single right-turn lane with length between 75 and 150 ft., and intersection angle and curb
radius limit turning speed to 15 mph.
LTS ≥ 3
Otherwise. LTS ≥ 4
Source: Mekuria, Maaza. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity, Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012.
Table 6: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria for Unsignalized Crossings Without a Median Refuge Width of Street Being Crossed
Speed Limit of Street Being Crossed
Up to 3 lanes 4-5 lanes 6+ lanes
Up to 25 mph LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 4
30 mph LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 4
35 mph LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 4
40+ mph LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4
Source: Mekuria, Maaza. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity, Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012. 665
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 7: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria for Unsignalized Crossings with a Median Refuge at Least Six Feet Wide
Width of Street Being Crossed
Speed Limit of Street Being Crossed
Up to 3 lanes 4-5 lanes 6+ lanes
Up to 25 mph LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 2
30 mph LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 3
35 mph LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 4
40+ mph LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4
Source: Mekuria, Maaza. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity, Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012.
Path LTS
The on-street LTS methodology employed does not include a detailed path segment or crossing methodology to account for the various design factors that affect quality of service and user stress on Class I paths like those across the City. Thus, Kittelson created a parallel evaluation of path LTS that accounts for path segments and crossings to accompany the on-street LTS methodology. The intent of the path LTS methodology is to account for the varying qualities of service on paths throughout the City and to be able to carry forward the path analysis into prioritization and plan recommendations alongside the on-street LTS analysis. The details of the path LTS analysis are presented in Attachment A: Class I Path LTS Methodology. The results maps of the path LTS evaluation are included alongside the on-street LTS results in this memo.
AVAILABLE DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS
Kittelson obtained data from the City and compiled it in a spatial database to conduct the on-street and path LTS analyses. Where GIS data were not available, Kittelson combined field review, Google Earth aerial review, City input, and assumptions to build out necessary inputs. The data used in the analysis are shown in Table 8.
Table 8: Data Requirements and Assumptions
Data Requirement Data Availability/Assumptions
Existing dedicated bicycle facilities
(Class I, II, II buffered, and IV) in the
City
Digitized the City’s existing bicycle facilities. See Figure 1.
Presence of parking lanes adjacent to
bike lanes
This attribute only applies where Class II facilities exist alongside parking (Table 1). Kittelson conducted field review of Class II locations and mapped the presence or absence of parking. See Figure 2.
Number of vehicle lanes
Kittelson used City-provided data, which was reviewed and confirmed. Kittelson reviewed missing locations to obtain complete network coverage. See Figure 3.
666
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Data Requirement Data Availability/Assumptions
Speed Limit
Kittelson utilized speed limit data provided by the City in shapefile format. On residential roads without speed limit data or posted speeds, speed limit of 25 mph was applied based on the City’s prima facie speed limits.4 See Figure 4.
Bike lane width Kittelson conducted field reviews to determine bike lane widths where the methodology required them.
Bike lane buffer width Kittelson conducted field reviews to determine bike lane buffer widths where the methodology required them.
Width of bike lane and adjacent
parking lane
Kittelson conducted field reviews to determine parking lane widths adjacent to bike lanes where the methodology required this information.
Frequency of bicycle lane blockage
This attribute is a binary variable (i.e., whether the bicycle lane is frequently blocked or not) used to reassign facilities with a bike lane to be evaluated as mixed traffic facilities (see note, Table 2). Kittelson assumed that bike lanes next to driveways for large parking lots (such as retail centers) are frequently blocked and applied the mixed traffic criteria for those segments.
Average Daily Traffic
Kittelson used the ADT provided by City in shapefile and/or spreadsheet format. Where ADT was not available, ADT
categories were estimated based on downstream volumes,
adjacent roadways, or the general land use context around a facility. These generally included facilities that were clearly in the highest ADT category for analysis (8,001 +)
Centerline presence
Kittelson assumed collector streets are striped with centerlines and local/neighborhood streets were not. The functional classification designations came from the City’s 2013 General Plan Circulation Element and from 2012 functional
classification designation forms submitted to Caltrans. Where inconsistencies were present, Kittelson assumed a street to be the higher order designation between the two.
Presence of right turn lanes and
features (e.g., number of lanes and
length, and curb radius)
This attribute is required for intersection crossing analysis.
Kittelson applied these manually based on Google Earth review on an as-needed basis.
Presence of pocket bike lanes and
features (e.g., number of lanes and
length, and curb radius)
This attribute is required for intersection crossing analysis.
Kittelson applied these manually based on Google Earth review on an as-needed basis.
Median presence and width
This attribute is required for intersection crossing analysis.
Kittelson applied these manually based on Google Earth review on an as-needed basis.
4 https://dublin.ca.gov/2094/Speed-Surveys
667
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
EXISTING CONDITIONS LTS RESULTS
On-Street LTS
The available GIS data, field reviews, Google Earth review, and other assumptions documented above were applied using the methodologies outlined in this memo. The results of the on-street LTS analysis are shown in Figure 7.
On-street LTS scores were first calculated for bidirectional segments utilizing the segment criteria outlined in Table 1 through Table 3 (with off-street paths receiving a score of LTS 1). For locations where low-stress facilities crossed high-stress facilities, the crossing LTS methodologies were applied as outlined in Table 4 through Table 7. For signalized intersections, locations with dedicated right turn lanes and/or pocket bike lanes were reviewed and the approach’s LTS score was updated if intersection conditions would result in an increased level of stress. Likewise, for unsignalized intersections, LTS scores were updated as needed.
As shown in Figure 7, low-stress on-street facilities in the City generally consist of local residential roads without dedicated bicycle facilities. Arterial roads, such as Dublin Boulevard generally consist of higherstress segments for bicyclists, due to features such as vehicular speeds, traffic volumes, and the number of travel lanes, regardless of the inclusion of bike lanes. In addition, low-stress roads are assessed as higher stress (i.e., downgraded to LTS 3 or 4) where they cross high stress facilities, meaning that some low-stress areas are “islands” isolated by high-stress segments and crossings. Figure 8 presents the City’s network of low-stress facilities, which helps to highlight where gaps exist. For example, Fallon Road, Tassajara Road, San Ramon Road, and Dublin Boulevard create low-stress gaps in the on-street network.
Path LTS
As shown in Figure 12, Class IA multi-use paths most frequently score a path LTS of 2 given their width, shoulder, and wayfinding presence. Class IB sidepaths frequently score a path LTS of 3 given no wayfinding present along their segments. The path crossings vary but rarely exceed LTS 3 except at intersection crossings with high speeds, no horizontal/vertical elements, and no crossing markings or signage. Although path LTS values were assessed for every path crossing location, only the crossings with lower scores than the connecting path segments are shown in the mapped results. In other words, the only mapped crossings are those which degrade the segment path LTS score.
Combined Results
The on-street and path LTS results are presented together in Figure 13 to provide a full picture of connectivity citywide. Note that the directionality of the on-street LTS has been suppressed in order to simplify the level of detail shown; each on-street segment is displaying its highest (i.e., worst) LTS value in Figure 13 rather than directional LTS values.
668
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
NEXT STEPS
After City review and associated revisions to the results, these on-street and path LTS results will be carried forward to inform subsequent Task 3 latent demand analysis and Task 4 network prioritization processes.
MAP RESULTS
On-Street LTS Maps
Figure 1a: Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (On-Street) Figure 1b: Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (Off-Street) Figure 1c: Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (Combined) Figure 2: Presence of Parking Adjacent to Bike Lanes
Figure 3: Number of Vehicle Lanes
Figure 4: Speed Limits
Figure 5: Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Figure 6: Roadway Functional Classifications
Figure 7: Level of Traffic Stress
Figure 8: Level of Traffic Stress (Low-Stress Facilities) Class I Path LTS Maps
Figure 9: Existing Path Widths
Figure 10: Existing Shoulder and Roadway Separation/Buffer Figure 11: Existing Path Wayfinding
Figure 12: Path LTS (Segment and Intersection)
Combined
Figure 13: On-Street and Path LTS
669
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\01a Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (On-Street).mxd Date: 7/13/2020 Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Figure 1a
Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (On-Street)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
670
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\01b Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (Off-Street).mxd Date: 7/13/2020 Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
Figure 1b
Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (Off-Street)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
671
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\01c Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (combined).mxd Date: 7/13/2020 Class IIA Bicycle Lane
Class IIA Bicycle Lane - Under Construction
Class IIB Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Bicycle Lane, Under Construction
Class III Bikeway
Class III Bikeway - Under Construction
Figure 1c
Existing Dedicated Bicycle Facilities (Combined)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
Class IA Multi-use Path
Class IA Multi-use Path - Under Construction
Class IB Sidepath
Class IB Sidepath - Under Construction
672
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\02 Presence of Parking Adjacent to Bike Lanes.mxd Date: 7/7/2020 Parking Adjacent to Bike Lanes
No
Yes
Figure 2
Presence of Parking Adjacent to Bike Lanes
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
673
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\03 Number of Vehicle Lanes.mxd Date: 7/7/2020 Vehicle Lanes per Direction
1 2
3 4
Figure 3
Number of Vehicle Lanes
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
674
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\04 Speed Limits.mxd Date: 7/7/2020 25 MPH Speed Limit
30 MPH Speed Limit
35 MPH Speed Limit
40 MPH Speed Limit
45 MPH Speed Limit
Figure 4
Speed Limits
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
675
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\05 Average Daily Traffic.mxd Date: 7/7/2020 ADT Category
0 - 750
751 - 1500
1501 - 3000
3001 - 8000
>8000
Figure 5
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
676
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\06 Roadway Functional Classifications.mxd Date: 7/7/2020 Arterials
Class I Collector Streets
Class II Collector Streets
Residential Streets
Freeways and Ramps
Figure 6
Roadway Functional Classifications
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
677
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\LTS Analysis.mxd Date: 7/13/2020 LTS Score
1 2
3 4
Figure 7
Level of Traffic Stress
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
678
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\LTS Analysis - low stress.mxd Date: 7/13/2020 LTS Score
1 2
Figure 8
Level of Traffic Stress - Low Stress Facilities
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
679
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
FALL CREEK RD
CROMWELL AV
H AV EN L P
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
12THST
FCI
6TH ST
DIANA LN
QUARTZ CI
RANGE RD
SCHAEFER LN
ALBROOK DR
VALLEY VISTA DR
DUBLIN BL
PENND
V
R
ILLAGE PW
WILDWOOD RD
CENTRAL PW
BENT TREE DR
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
PARK PL
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
VITTORIA LP
INSPIRATION DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\09 Existing Path Widths.mxd Date: 7/14/2020 Class IA Paths by Width
Less than 8 Feet
8 - 9 Feet
10 Feet or Greater
Class IB Paths by Width
Less than 8 Feet
8 - 9 Feet
10 Feet or Greater
Figure 9
Existing Path Widths
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
680
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
FALL CREEK RD
CROMWELL AV
H AV EN L P
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
12THST
FCI
6TH ST
DIANA LN
QUARTZ CI
RANGE RD
SCHAEFER LN
ALBROOK DR
VALLEY VISTA DR
DUBLIN BL
PENND
V
R
ILLAGE PW
WILDWOOD RD
CENTRAL PW
BENT TREE DR
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
PARK PL
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
VITTORIA LP
INSPIRATION DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\10 Existing Path Shoulder and Buffer.mxd Date: 7/14/2020 Class IA Paths by Shoulder
2 Feet or Greater
Less than 2 Feet
No Shoulder
Class IB Paths by Buffer/Roadway Separation
No Roadway Separation
Roadway Separation
Path Shoulder and Buffer/Roadway Separation Presence
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
Figure 10
681
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
FALL CREEK RD
CROMWELL AV
H AV EN L P
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
12THST
FCI
6TH ST
DIANA LN
QUARTZ CI
RANGE RD
SCHAEFER LN
ALBROOK DR
VALLEY VISTA DR
DUBLIN BL
PENND
V
R
ILLAGE PW
WILDWOOD RD
CENTRAL PW
BENT TREE DR
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
PARK PL
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
VITTORIA LP
INSPIRATION DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\11 Existing Wayfinding on Paths.mxd Date: 7/14/2020 Class IA Paths by Wayfinding
No Wayfinding
Signage
Class IB Paths by Wayfinding
No Wayfinding
Signage
Figure 11
Existing Wayfinding on Paths
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
682
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
FALL CREEK RD
CROMWELL AV
H AV EN L P
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
12THST
FCI
6TH ST
DIANA LN
QUARTZ CI
RANGE RD
SCHAEFER LN
ALBROOK DR
VALLEY VISTA DR
DUBLIN BL
PENND
V
R
ILLAGE PW
WILDWOOD RD
CENTRAL PW
BENT TREE DR
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
PARK PL
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
VITTORIA LP
INSPIRATION DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\12 Path LTS.mxd Date: 7/14/2020 Path LTS Scores
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Crossing
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Path LTS - Segment and Crossing
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
Figure 12
683
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
FALL CREEK RD
CROMWELL AV
H AV EN L P
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
12THST
FCI
6TH ST
DIANA LN
QUARTZ CI
RANGE RD
SCHAEFER LN
ALBROOK DR
VALLEY VISTA DR
DUBLIN BL
PENND
V
R
ILLAGE PW
WILDWOOD RD
CENTRAL PW
BENT TREE DR
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
PARK PL
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
VITTORIA LP
INSPIRATION DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\13 All LTS COmbined.mxd Date: 7/14/2020 Path LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
On-Street and Path LTS
Dublin, California
[ 0 1Mile
Figure 13
684
ATTACHMENT A: CLASS I PATH LTS MEMORANDUM
685
FILENAME: H:\24\24392 - DUBLIN ATP\TASK 3 - BASELINE CONDITIONS & NEEDS ASSESSMENT\3.3.3 LTS ANALYSIS\PATH LTS\24392_CLASS I PATH_LTS METHODOLOGY_20200714_FINAL.DOCX
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 14, 2020 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
City of Dublin
From: Mike Alston, RSP; Amanda Leahy, AICP; & Michael Sahimi, AICP Project: Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Subject: Class I Path LTS Methodology
INTRODUCTION
The following memorandum presents a methodology for evaluating a level of stress along the City of Dublin’s (City’s) Class I path network. The City has an extensive network of designated Class I paths, provided as an alternative to on-street facilities, that vary in width, intersection treatments, and other features. In order to identify whether adequate service quality is provided on this network, these paths will be evaluated alongside the on-street level of traffic stress (LTS) methodology. The custom methodology, referred to as path LTS, will include four levels comparable to the typical level of traffic stress methodology:
• LTS 1: Requires little attention to surroundings; suitable for most children • LTS 2: Low traffic stress; suitable for most adults
• LTS 3: Moderate traffic stress for all bicyclists
• LTS 4: High stress; only suitable for experienced bicyclists.
The City’s Class I network consists of two relevant facility types:
• Class IA Paths: Multiuse paths along a separate alignment. Examples include the Iron Horse Trail and the Martin Creek Trail.
• Class IB Sidepaths: Sidepaths along the side of a roadway, which double as sidewalks. Examples include segments along the north side of Dublin Boulevard or the west side of San Ramon Road.
The 2012 Bicycle Master Plan did not subclassify Class I paths, but the distinction is necessary to evaluate the quality of service they provide. There are distinct elements of each (e.g., buffer between Class IB sidepaths and the roadway) that determine to the quality of service provided, so they are accounted for separately for this analysis. We will account for these elements to score Class IA and IB paths within the City of Dublin on a 1 to 4 path LTS rubric alongside the on-street LTS analysis. Note 686
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
that all of the Class I facilities within the City are multiuse paths (i.e., serve bicyclists and pedestrians), given that they are either off-street connections or provided along the roadside such as the only offstreet accommodation. Elements of the evaluation include the following:
• Segment characteristics
• Width
• Path shoulder and roadway separation/buffer
• Wayfinding and path indication
• Intersection/crossing elements
• Control strategy and crossing distance
• Signal treatments
• Horizontal or vertical geometric treatments
• Marking and signs
Segments are defined as homogenous connections between street crossings: when any of the segment input characteristics along a Class I path change, the resulting segments will be split and evaluated separately for the resulting homogeneous components. Appendix A provides an inventory of Class I facilities including their widths.
SEGMENT CHARACTERISTICS
Width
The Class I paths within the City are intended to serve two-way bicycle travel. The width requirements to allow for two-way bicycle travel are greater than for one-way bicycle travel. Additionally, the HDM recommends that “Development of a one-way bike path should be undertaken only in rare situations where there is a need for only one direction of travel.” • The Caltrans Highway Design Manual cites a minimum paved width of 8 feet for two-way bicycle travel, with 10 feet preferred. (Section 1003.1 (1)(a)) • For locations with “heavy bicycle volumes … and/or significant pedestrian traffic … expected,” the HDM states that the path ”should be” greater than 10 feet wide (preferably 12 feet). (Section 1003.1 (1)(a))
• Class IA multiuse paths would expect less significant pedestrian traffic than Class IB sidepaths would because Class IB sidepaths typically also serve the purpose of a sidewalk. • According to the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide, “Conflicts between path users are a primary source of injuries and can result in a degraded experience for all users where paths are not wide enough to handle the mixture and volume of diverse users.” 1 1 The FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide is available online at https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/docs/fhwasa18077.pdf. 687
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
• The MassDOT Separated Bicycle Lane Planning & Design Guide provides guidance for separated bike lanes; it allows for a minimum of 8 feet (10 feet recommended) of width for bidirectional separated bike lanes to allow for two-way bicycle travel with fewer than 150 bidirectional bicyclists per hour. This does not account for pedestrian use.2 Width as a criteria for path LTS is combined with shoulder and roadway separation/barrier. See below and refer to Table 1.
Path Shoulder and Roadway Separation/Buffer
Shoulder:
Per Section 1003.1(1)(b), The HDM requires a minimum 2-foot-wide shoulder for Class I bike paths to serve as a recovery zone and to reduce conflicts with pedestrians. The shoulder should be composed of the same material as the path or should at least be free of vegetation: “adequate clearance from fixed objects is needed regardless of the paved width.” Roadway Buffer:
Per Section 1003.1(7), the HDM recommends one of the following forms of separation for paths adjacent to the traveled way:
• A minimum separation between the edge of pavement of a bicycle path and the edge of traveled way: at least 5 feet plus shoulder widths.
• For separation less than 10 feet, landscaping or other features that form a continuous barrier should be provided.
Landscaping buffers form an adequate continuous barrier along most Class IB sidepaths in the City. 2 Although this guidance is written for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, it is recognized as relevant best practice guidance. It is available online at https://www.mass.gov/lists/separated-bike-lane-planning-designguide. 688
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 1: Path LTS Score based on Width/Buffer/Shoulder
Path
LTS
Score
Class IA Multiuse Path Class IB Sidepath
Path width
8 ft ≤ x < 10
ft
Path Width
≥10 ft
Path Width
8 ft ≤ x < 10 ft
Path Width
≥10 ft
LTS 1
≥2 ft
shoulder
provided
Shoulder
provided (any
width)
n/a
Roadway buffer
provided (continuous
barrier or 10 ft
separation)
LTS 2
<2 ft
shoulder
provided
No shoulder
provided
Roadway buffer
provided (continuous
barrier or 10 ft
separation)
n/a
LTS 3
No shoulder
provided n/a n/a
No roadway buffer
provided
LTS 4 n/a n/a No roadway buffer
provided
n/a
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Figure 1: Example Class IB sidepath along the east side of Brannigan Street south of Gleason Drive. The path is between 8 and 10 feet wide and continuous separation from the roadway is provided by landscaping. The path would be eligible for LTS 2 based on the width/buffer/shoulder criterion.
Source: Google Earth
689
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Wayfinding and Path Indication
Designated path segments should be clearly marked as such, especially including Class IB sidepaths given that they double as sidewalks. The Caltrans HDM states the following regarding mixing bicyclists and pedestrians:
Sidewalks are not to be designated for bicycle travel. Wide sidewalks that do not meet design standards for bicycle paths or bicycle routes also may not meet the safety and mobility needs of bicyclists. Wide sidewalks can encourage higher speed bicycle use and can increase the potential for conflicts with turning traffic at intersections as well as with pedestrians and fixed objects. In residential areas, sidewalk riding by young children too inexperienced to ride in the street is common. It is inappropriate to sign these facilities as bikeways because it may lead bicyclists to think it is designed to meet their safety and mobility needs. Bicyclists should not be encouraged (through signing) to ride their bicycles on facilities that are not designed to accommodate bicycle travel. - Section 1003.3(2)
Sidewalks are thus discouraged from designation as bicycle paths. However, provided that the other criteria can be met to provide for comfortable travel (i.e., the path is “designed to meet their safety and mobility needs”), pavement or signage indications of the facility should give pedestrians an expectation that they may encounter bicyclists (and vice versa). All users should be informed that the segment is in fact designated for use as a path and not a sidewalk. Signage and wayfinding alone are therefore necessary but not sufficient to provide a low-stress path facility. This is consistent with the “weakest link” approach for path LTS evaluation. Wayfinding alone will not lower an otherwise high path LTS score but it can degrade the score of an otherwise low path LTS score facility. 690
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 2: Path LTS Score based on Segment Wayfinding/Indication Path LTS Score Class IA Multiuse Path or Class IB Sidepath LTS 1
Pavement markings (see Figure 2) and
wayfinding signage along trail
LTS 2 Wayfinding signage along path
LTS 3 None provided
LTS 4 n/a
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Figure 2: Example pavement markings delineating road user space along a path in San Francisco, CA and (left) and indicating status as shared-use in Emeryville, CA (right) Source: Flickr (left) and Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (right) 691
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
INTERSECTION/CROSSING ELEMENTS
Paths are reintroduced to motor vehicle conflicts at crossings, which can be a significant source of stress. Class IA and IB paths will be treated uniformly at intersections/crossings. According to the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide (Guide), “Care should be taken at intersections and driveways … Crash patterns consistently show contra-flow movement of bicyclists are a main factor in crashes due to motorists failing to yield or look for approaching bicyclists.” The Guide suggests the following to mitigate these conflicts:
• Application of separate phases at signals
• Reduced corner radii or raised crossings to slow drivers • Improved sight lines
• Marked crossings and regulatory signs to improve driver awareness The HDM cites two particular design elements for attention at crossings (1003.1(5)):
• Crossing control: Grade separation is desirable, followed by signalization. Where traffic is “not heavy,” STOP or YIELD signs may be used for the path or for the cross street. • Crossing location: “When crossing an arterial street, the crossing should either occur at the pedestrian crossing, where vehicles can be expected to stop, or at a location completely out of the influence of any intersection to permit adequate opportunity for bicyclists to see turning vehicles….Even when crossing within or adjacent to the pedestrian crossing, “STOP” or “YIELD” signs for bicyclists should be placed to minimize potential for conflict resulting from turning autos….In some cases, Bike Xing signs may be placed in advance of the crossing to alert motorists.”
Based on these sources, the three elements to be incorporated in the Class I Path LTS will include:
• Control, geometry, and crossing distance
• Markings and signs
• Horizontal or vertical treatments
Because crossings at intersections deal with turning traffic but perpendicular trail crossings do not, separate criteria are appropriate for each, termed intersection crossings and perpendicular crossings. 692
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 3: Intersection Class IB Sidepath Crossing along Lockhart Street at Central Parkway (left) and Class IA Perpendicular Crossing along Tassajara Creek Trail at Central Parkway (right).
Source: Google
Control, Geometry, and Crossing Distance
Depending on the characteristics of the crossing, different control strategies and geometric design characteristics may be appropriate.
Intersection Crossings
Intersection crossings require path users to interact with turning vehicles and conflict points from all intersection approach legs. Because of this, crossing control and geometry can be used to affect conflicts in time (e.g., separate control phases) and space (e.g., separation or driver deflection).
Consistent with the recommendations in the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide, physical design elements that slow drivers, enhance visibility, or both, can enhance a path’s service quality. The following elements are included that would greatly improve the bicyclist’ experience at crossings:
• A “bend-out” design (see Figure 4) or a protected intersection-style corner safety island that offsets the crossing from vehicle turning movements (only applicable at intersections). . Although this design treatment is most applicable to a Class II or Class IV bicycle lane, the separation benefit applies for intersection or driveway crossings along a Class IB sidepath. • A bulb-out which reduces the curb return radius and turning movement speeds. This treatment is most effective when the lane geometry of the turning and receiving roadways force a driver to adhere to the reduced radius.
• A raised crossing, which includes vertical deflection and reduces driver speeds. • A right-turn pocket or channelized vehicle turn lane with sufficient sight distance and geometry to encourage a comfortable provide a path crossing. The dedicated right-turn pocket or lane provides drivers the opportunity to yield without through traffic behind them. • Signal phasing solutions including a separated bicycle signal phase or a leading pedestrian interval/leading bicycle interval, which provide separation in time between motor vehicles and path users.
693
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 4: "Bend Out" concept that pulls a bicycle crossing back from the curb to improve visibility to drivers
In applying this criterion, the geometric treatments are referred to as horizontal or vertical treatments and may be considered interchangeably.
Intersection Applicability
The criterion presented in Table 3 applies to path crossings either at a signalized intersection or along an uncontrolled roadway at an unsignalized crossing (i.e., the major street). For Class IB sidepaths crossing alongside a stop-controlled intersection, the criteria in Table 4 apply. 694
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 3: Intersection Crossing LTS Score based on Control Strategy and Crossing Distance • Path
LTS
Score
Control Strategy and Crossing Distance
2-lane total cross-section (both roadways) >2-lane cross-section (Either roadway) Signalized
Intersection
Unsignalized
Intersection
Signalized
Intersection
Unsignalized
Intersection
LTS 1
Leading bicycle
interval, separated
signal phase, or
horizontal/vertical
elements
All-way Stop
Control, parallel
speed ≤ 25 mph
Separated bicycle
signal phase
n/a
LTS 2
Parallel speeds <40
mph
All-way Stop
Control, parallel
speed > 25 mph;
OR
Parallel speeds ≤ 25
mph or with
vertical/horizontal
elements
Leading bicycle
interval or
horizontal/vertical
elements
All-way Stop
Control;
OR
Parallel speeds
≤25 mph or with
vertical/horizontal
elements
LTS 3
Parallel speeds ≥40
mph Parallel speeds <40
mph
Parallel speeds <40
mph
Parallel speeds
<40 mph
LTS 4 n/a Parallel speeds ≥40
mph
Parallel speeds ≥40
mph
Parallel speeds
≥40 mph
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
695
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Perpendicular Crossings
As discussed above, the control strategy appropriate for perpendicular crossings depends on the characteristics of the road being crossed: speed, volume, and crossing distance. For a simplified approach, the number of lanes provides a measure of crossing distance and a proxy for vehicle volume.
Table 4: Perpendicular Crossing LTS Score based on Control Strategy and Crossing Distance Path LTS
Score
Perpendicular Crossing Control Strategy and Crossing Distance 2-lane total cross-section >2-lane cross-section
LTS 1
RRFB, PHB, or signal control;
OR
Raised crossing with yield control
Signal control
LTS 2
Stop or yield control, Cross street speed
< 40 mph
RRFB, PHB
OR
Stop or yield control; cross street ≤ 25
mph
LTS 3
Stop or yield control; Cross street speed
≥ 40 mph
Stop or yield control; cross street speed
> 25 mph
LTS 4
n/a
Stop or yield control; cross street speed
≥ 40 mph
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Markings and Signs
This criterion only applies for intersection crossings, where drivers may not be expecting two-way or same-direction Class IB sidepath bicycle travel as they approach a crossing. (This includes all crossings at unsignalized intersections.) Thus, indication of a path crossing is helpful to reduce the stress of a facility. As previously described, the HDM (Section 1003.1(5)) recommends that crossing signs may be placed in advance of a crossing to alert motorists. Example signs include the combination of the MUTCD W11-15 and W11-15P signs, depicted in Figure 5, and described in Section 9B.18 of the California MUTCD. Figure 5 also depicts crossing markings already applied at various intersection crossings in the City.
696
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 5: W11-15 (left), Supplementary W11-15P (middle), and Path Pavement Markings in Dublin (right) Source: CA-MUTCD; Google
Table 5: LTS Score based on Markings and Signage
Path
LTS
Score
Markings and Signage
LTS 1
Signage and pavement markings indicating path crossing
LTS 2
Signage or pavement markings indicating path crossing
LTS 3
No signage or pavement markings indicating a path crossing LTS 4
n/a
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
697
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 6: Combined Path LTS Criteria. Methodology observes a “weakest link” application whereby the highest score for any single criterion governs the overall path LTS score.
Criteria LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 3 LTS 4
Segment
Class IA
Width / Buffer /
Shoulder
Path Width:
8 ft ≤ x <10 ft ≥2 ft shoulder provided <2 ft shoulder provided No shoulder provided n/a Path Width:
≥10 ft Shoulder provided (any width) No Shoulder provided n/a n/a Wayfinding / Indication
Pavement markings (see Figure 2);
Wayfinding signage along path Wayfinding signage along path None provided n/a Class IB
Width / Buffer
8 ft ≤ x <10 ft
n/a
Roadway buffer provided (continuous barrier or 10 ft
separation)1 n/a No separation provided
≥10 ft Roadway buffer provided (continuous barrier or 10 ft separation)1 n/a No separation provided n/a
Wayfinding / Indication
Pavement markings designating space for path
users (see Figure 2);
Wayfinding signage Wayfinding signage along path None provided n/a Crossing
Intersection
Crossing
Control,
Geometry,
Crossing
Distance
2-lane Total
Cross-Section
(both roadways)
Signalized
Leading bicycle interval, separated bicycle signal phase, or horizontal/vertical elements
Parallel speeds <40 mph Parallel speeds ≥40 mph n/a
Unsignalized All-way stop control, parallel speeds ≤25 mph All-way stop control, parallel speeds >25 mph
OR
Parallel speeds ≤25 mph or with vertical/horizontal elements Parallel speeds <40 mph Parallel speeds ≥40 mph
>2-lane Total
Cross Section
(either roadway)
Signalized Separated bicycle signal phase Leading bicycle interval or horizontal/vertical elements Parallel speeds <40 mph Parallel speeds ≥40 mph Unsignalized n/a
All-way stop control
OR
Parallel speeds ≤25 mph or vertical/horizontal elements Parallel speeds <40 mph Parallel speeds ≥40 mph
Markings / Signs* Signage and pavement markings indicating path crossing* Signage or pavement markings indicating path crossing* No signage or pavement markings indicating
a path crossing*
n/a
Perpendicular
Crossing
Control, Geometry,
Crossing Distance
2-lane Total CrossSection
RRFB, PHB, or signal control,
OR
Raised crossing with yield control
Stop or yield control, speed < 40 mph Stop or yield control, speed ≥ 40 mph n/a >2-lane Total Cross
Section Signal control
RRFB or PHB;
OR
Stop or yield control, cross street ≤ 25 mph
Stop or yield control, cross street > 25 mph
Stop or yield control, cross street
speed ≥ 40 mph
*Criterion does not apply to all-way stop control crossings.
Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
698
ATTACHMENT A: CLASS I FACILITIES – WIDTH INVENTORY
699
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 7: Class I Facility – Width Inventory
Trail
Path
Type Location Width
Martin Creek Canyon Trail Class IA Bidirectional - one side only 7’ Dublin Boulevard Class IA N side --- west of Silvergate 4.5’ San Ramon Road sidepath Class IB West side of roadway 10’ Unnamed trail branching west off
of San Ramon Road Class IA
Connection to Mape
Memorial Park Varies; 7-8’
Alamo Canal Trail Class IA Continuous ≥10’
Iron Horse Trail Class IA Continuous ≥10’
Dougherty Road Class IB
E Side – Scarlett to N City
Limits
9 to 14’ from Scarlett
to Fall Creek;
8’ Fall Creek to N.
City Limits
Dublin Boulevard Class IB
N side -- Iron Horse Trail to
Tassajara Creek 12’
Dublin Boulevard Class IB
S side - Hacienda Drive to
Tassajara Road 8’
Martinelli Way Class IB
N side b/w Arnold and
Hacienda 8.5’
Brannigan Street Class IB
East side - Dublin to Fallon
Middle School 8'
Brannigan Street Class IA
West side - Gleason to Fallon
Middle school 8’
Horizon Parkway (In Progress) Class IB N side - Scarlett to Arnold 10’ Sterling Road (In Progress) Class IB Both sides - Dublin to Horizon 10’ Iron Horse Parkway (In Progress) Class IB E Side – Dublin to Horizon 10’ Arnold Way Class IB W Side – Dublin to Gleason ≥10’
Central Parkway Class IB N side - Brannigan to Lockhart 8’ Central Parkway Class IB S side - Brannigan to Lockhart Varies; 5-8’ Dublin Boulevard Class IB S side - Brannigan to Grafton 8’ Dublin Boulevard Class IB
N side - Brannigan to Finnian
Way 8’
Dublin Boulevard Class IB
N side – Finnian Way to
Grafton 7’
Tassajara Creek Trail Class IA Continuous ≥10’
Finnian Way Class IB
S side - Brannigan St to Bray
Commons 8’
Finnian Way Class IB
N side - Brannigan St to Bray
Commons 8’
700
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Class I Path LTS Methodology Project #: 24392 July 14, 2020 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Trail
Path
Type Location Width
Grafton Street Class IB
W side - Central to Fairfield
Park 12’
Grafton Street Class IB
E side - Central to Fairfield
Park 8’
Lockhart Street Class IB
E side - N of Dublin to
Gleason 12’
Positano Pkwy Class IB S side - Fallon to school 8'
Positano Pkwy Class IB N side - Fallon to school 8'
Antone Way Class IB
N side - Dublin Ranch to
Fallon 40’
Fallon Road Class IB W side - Gleason to Tassajara 12'
Sterling Street Class IB Dublin to Central 8'
Central Parkway Class IB Fallon to eastern extents 8’
Central Parkway Class IB Fallon to eastern extents 8’
Wallis Ranch Drive Class IB
W side between Tassajara
Creek and Stags Leap 8'
Rutherford Drive Class IB
E side from Tassajara to trail
connection 8'
Trail parallel to Croak
Road/Volterra Drive Class IB
S. Terracina to N extents of
Volterra Varies; 9 - 10’
701
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
EXISTING
CONDITIONS:
DEMAND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX B
702
FILENAME: H:\24\24392 - DUBLIN ATP\TASK 3 - BASELINE CONDITIONS & NEEDS ASSESSMENT\3.3.4 DEMAND ANALYSIS\RESULTS MEMO\5-2021\24392_DEMAND ANALYSIS_DRAFT RESULTS MEMO_20210510_CLEAN.DOCX
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update
Draft Demand Analysis Results - Bicycle Access
Date: May 10, 2021 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
From: Mike Alston, RSP; Amanda Leahy, AICP
cc: Pratyush Bhatia
The City of Dublin (City) is updating its 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Plan). The Plan will serve as a comprehensive action plan for the City to provide improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities for its residents, employees, and visitors.
Per the scope of work, the demand analysis task (Task 3.3.4) identifies baseline levels of walking and biking around existing activity nodes and assesses latent bicycle and pedestrian demand that could be realized through improved infrastructure recommended in the Plan. The intent of this task to indicate the magnitude of potential latent demand for walking and biking based on a set of assumptions about the known relationship between infrastructure and mode choice. There are a number of other factors that influence mode choice decisions and could provide a more precise estimate of mode share which are beyond the intent and scope of this task.
Mode share estimates based on existing infrastructure will be compared to estimates for a future recommended network to determine potential mode shift. This potential for mode shift associated with latent demand will be presented in the Plan. The outputs from this analysis will also serve as inputs for network prioritization as part of Plan development.
This memorandum (memo) is organized as follows:
• Summary
o Assumptions and Methodology
o Results
o Next Steps
• Biking and Walking Typologies for Dublin
• Mode Share Data
• Detailed Results
• Map Figures
• Appendices A through F
703
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
SUMMARY
This latent demand analysis presents mode share estimates for Dublin residents to access four categories of activity centers: schools, BART stations, job centers, and parks. These results will be compared to access for a recommended improved network that will show the potential for an improved biking and walking network to unlock latent demand for biking and walking. The Plan will present the potential for mode shift associated with recommended improvements.
Assumptions and Methodology
For both biking and walking, the existing network is compared to a future network by modeling mode choice sensitivity to changes in the built environment, including presence and quality of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. For biking, potential mode shift indicative of latent demand is assessed through the availability of low-stress bicycle routes as measured by bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS) scores. For walking, potential mode shift is assessed through modeling uncontrolled crossings along major roadways in the City as crossing barriers.
Kittelson used available land use and demographic data to model residential locations and their network distance (i.e., distance along available paths) to activity centers. The path of travel for Dublin residents was blocked or impeded at identified barriers, with the resulting perceived network distances increased. Propensity to walk or bike is estimated based on perceived travel distance to destinations.
More detail on the analysis methodology is presented in the methodology memo in Appendix A.
Results
How to interpret these results
For each activity center, a mode share point estimate is presented that represents the share of the Dublin population that could be expected walk or bike to a given destination given their natural propensity to walk or bike, their distance to the destination, and the quality of the infrastructure available. These estimates were determined by four inputs:
1. Demographic data: Dublin residents are grouped into differing walking and biking typology groups based on age; these groups are assumed to exhibit different propensities to walk or bike and responsiveness to supportive infrastructure (explained in the Biking and Walking Typologies in Dublin section).
2. Network distance to destination: The actual network distance between residential parcels in the City and each activity center is determined based on the shortest available route. 704
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
3. Barriers or impediments: For walking, uncontrolled crossings of major roads either block or impede an available walking route.1 For biking, a high LTS score (3 or 4) similarly blocks or impedes available routes. Barriers block access and require a different route; impediments increase the perceived travel distance which in turn decreases likelihood of walking or biking.
4. Available mode share data: Kittelson used data from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), BART station profile surveys, the American Community Survey (ACS), and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) mode share surveys to estimate the percentage of people walking and biking and the relationship between mode share and distance from destination. Kittelson constructed a lookup table (shared in the Mode Share Data section of this memorandum) to estimate percentage of the population to walk or bike for a given perceived distance to destination (e.g., a higher share of people would walk for a 0.5-mile trip compared to a 1-mile trip).
An example of the mode share estimation procedure is provided in Appendix G.
Existing Network – Bicycle Access
The analysis produces the following results based on the existing bicycle network:
• Schools: Walk and bike share estimates are provided for each school. Biking estimates range between 0 percent and 14 percent, and walking estimates range between 13 and 37 percent. The availability of low-stress bicycle routes (i.e., comprised exclusively of LTS 1 or 2 facilities) on routes to school varies depending on the school location.
• For two elementary schools, a low-stress biking route is available to over half of students. Six schools are located with a low-stress biking route available to 10 percent or fewer of students. • In general, elementary schools serve a more localized population of students and have a natural opportunity for higher biking or walking shares than the middle or high schools, which serve a broader geographic area with longer travel distances.
• BART: A mode share estimate is provided for access to either the West Dublin/Pleasanton or Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. The biking mode share estimate among Dublin residents is 6 percent overall, and the walking mode share estimate is 11 percent overall. • These mode share estimates should be interpreted with caution, as they do not account for trip type and origin-destination pairs (e.g., which residents have job locations that make BART a feasible option). Rather, they represent estimated propensity to walk or bike to BART for Dublin residents based on distance and infrastructure availability. • Approximately 40 percent of Dublin residents are able to access the closest BART station using a low-stress biking route.
1 Major roads were determined collaboratively with the City, using the FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossings as a reference point. More details are provided in Appendix A. 705
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
• Job Centers: A mode share estimate is provided for each of the seven job centers identified. Biking mode share estimates range between 1 and 3 percent, and walking mode share estimates range between 4 and 9 percent.
• These mode share estimates should be interpreted with caution, as they do not represent true home and job location combinations but instead represent estimated propensity for Dublin residents to walk or bike to each job center based on distance and infrastructure availability. • The availability of low-stress bike routes varies depending on job center location. The share of Dublin residents with a low-stress bicycle route available to each job center ranges from approximately 19 percent to 37 percent.2
• Parks: A mode share estimate is provided for access to any park for each resident. Bike mode share is estimated to be 3 percent overall, and walking share is estimated to be 62 percent. • These mode share estimates should be interpreted with caution, as they do not represent all park trips but instead represent estimated propensity to walk or bike for Dublin residents to their nearest available park (i.e., walking- or biking-accessible parks to residents). • Overall, 41 percent of Dublin residents have a low-stress biking route to their nearest City park.
Next Steps
The mode share estimates and the summary of residents with low-stress biking access to activity centers will be included in the Plan and available to the City to demonstrate the potential benefit of infrastructure improvements in the future. The maps and descriptions displaying biking and walking perceived distances provide an indication of the availability of low-stress biking routes and of direct walking routes that promote walking and biking. As a next step, Kittelson will work with the City to identify roadway and path network segments that impede or prevent walking and biking access to highlight for the Task 4 prioritization.
The following Plan goals are relevant to the findings of this analysis:
• Goal 3: Improve Connectivity – Develop a bicycle and pedestrian network that provides wellconnected facilities for users of all ages and abilities. • Goal 5: Prioritize Investments – Maintain sufficient funding to provide for existing and future bicycle and pedestrian needs; including supporting programs, operations, and maintenance.
Leverage biking and walking projects to promote economic activity and social equity outcomes among people of all ages and abilities.
The results of this analysis, especially the mapped results illustrating barriers to low-stress biking routes and walking routes, allow the project team to address both goals through this and subsequent tasks. 2 “Bicycle route available” indicates that a feasible route exists between origin and destination based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities) 706
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
BIKING AND WALKING TYPOLOGIES FOR DUBLIN
For this analysis, the Dublin population was grouped into biking and walking typologies based on age.
The typologies represent varying propensities to walk and bike and varying sensitivities to infrastructure quality.
Table 1 presents the estimated distribution of bicyclist types by age group in Dublin, and Table 2 presents the effect calculated LTS score has on biking access as modeled in this analysis. More details of the bicyclist type definitions and determinations are included in the methodology memo, which is attached as Appendix A.
Table 1: Bike Group Typology – Assumed Share of Biker Type by Age Group Type
Biker Type Share of Age Group (Columns Sum to 100%)
Under 5 6 - 18 18 - 34 35 – 54 55+
Strong and Fearless 0% 0% 11% 2% 0%
Enthused and Confident 0% 0% 7% 12% 7%
Interested but Concerned 0% 100% 61% 59% 46%
No Way, No How 100% 0% 21% 27% 47%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: Table developed by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. from data presented by Dill and McNeil Table 2: Impedance Factors for Bike Network
LTS Value of
Roadway
Impedance Effect for Biking Groups
No Way, No
How
Interested but
Concerned
Enthused and
Confident
Strong and
Fearless
LTS 1 / 2 No Access No effect
LTS 3 No Access
Absolute
Impedance:
Cannot use
segment
Relative
impedance: 1.5
distance
multiplier along
segment1
No effect
LTS 4 No Access
Absolute
Impedance:
Cannot use
segment
Absolute
Impedance:
Cannot use
segment
No effect
1This impedance factor is based on research by Broach, Gliebe, and Dill “Bicycle Route Choice Model Developed Using Revealed Preference GPS Data” indicating how far riders will diverge from the shortest path to avoid higher stress facilities 707
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 3 presents the modeled walking population types by age and the effect infrastructure has on their walking routes as modeled in this analysis. More details of the walking type definitions and determinations are included in the methodology memo, which is attached as Appendix A.
Table 3: Proposed Impedance Factors for Walking Network Infrastructure
condition
Impedance Effect for Walking Group
Youth (≤14)
Teenage and
Working Age Adults
(15-55)
Aging (56 +)
Known Sidewalk
gap1 Absolute impedance: Breaks network; inaccessible route Uncontrolled
crossing of highvolume roads
Absolute impedance:
Breaks network;
inaccessible route
Relative Impedance:
Adds 2.5 minutes to
journey2
Absolute impedance:
Breaks network;
inaccessible route
1 Comprehensive sidewalk gaps were not available, but sidewalk gaps were observed and modeled along major roadways. 2For this population, the route is available but is given the additional time penalty to approximate travel delay and general undesirability of crossing.
Source: Table developed by Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
MODE SHARE DATA
The mode share values used to estimate biking mode share are derived from a number of sources:
• City of Dublin and Alameda County Transportation Commission Safe Routes to School reports, including comparison among reported mode share data from assessments for Dougherty Elementary School, for Dublin Elementary School, and countywide. Detailed information is included in Appendix B.
• BART station profile access surveys. These surveys produce mode share estimates for each BART station, available online.
3 Kittelson worked with BART to identify home-based travel mode share to Dublin BART stations based on respondents’ home location and distance to the nearest station.
Detailed information is included in Appendix C.
• 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) data, conducted by the Federal Highway Administration with assigned travel dates from April 19, 2016 through April 25, 2017. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) participated in an add-on program to purchase extra household samples, resulting in 26,095 household samples statewide. The results presented below are based on a query within the 26,095 samples to reduce trips to those in Alameda and Contra 3 https://www.bart.gov/about/reports/profile
708
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Costa Counties, with place type defined “Suburban.” Appendix D includes a memo describing the place typology development; Figure 3 in that memo shows an overlay of place type which includes Dublin in the suburban neighborhood category.
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) data, which includes data on residents’ commute mode share and is available at the Census block group level and at higher spatial resolutions.
DETAILED RESULTS
Mode share estimates for existing conditions are presented by activity center and are organized as follows:
• Schools: All public K-12 schools within Dublin Unified School District • BART: West Dublin/Pleasanton station and Dublin/Pleasanton station • Job Centers: A number of job centers within Dublin identified with City staff • Parks: Neighborhood and community parks in Dublin, as identified in the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan and confirmed with City staff.
Mode share estimates vary by destination because people have different mode selection choices based on trip type and the characteristics of their destinations. Discussion of each activity center includes a table or chart illustrating the distribution of the relevant Dublin population by perceived travel distance as well as mode share estimates. Accompanying maps provide visual representation of available routes to activity centers. The mode share estimates should be interpreted with caution, as they are point estimates indicating estimated propensity for Dublin residents to walk or bike based on home location and distance to activity centers. However, they do not account for the remaining multitude of variables that impact mode share— including for example parking availability, household vehicle access, income and wealth level, disability status, trip chaining, and other infrastructure factors not collected, and many other factors. Constructing precise mode share estimates including those factors is beyond the scope of this task.
Table 4 presents the lookup values used for biking and walking estimates based on perceived distance.
These lookup values are estimates based on the best available data for this task. An example illustrates how this table was used:
• The top row, “0 -1/8 miles,” indicates 79 percent walking and 5 percent biking to parks. • This is the percent of the population estimated to have a perceived travel distance in that range to their nearest park.
• This process was repeated at every distance range listed. 709
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 4: Biking and Walking Mode Share by Activity Center Type and Distance Distance (Miles)
Activity Center Type
School1 BART2Job Centers3 Parks4
Walk Bike Walk Bike Walk Bike Walk Bike
0 – 1/8 55% 25% 85% 10% 75% 0% 79% 5%
1/8 – 1/4 55% 30% 85% 10% 75% 0% 79% 5%
1/4 – 3/8 40% 30% 80% 10% 45% 1% 67% 9%
3/8 – 1/2 40% 25% 80% 10% 45% 1% 67% 9%
1/2 – 5/8 16% 20% 66% 14% 13% 6% 42% 9%
5/8 – 3/4 16% 20% 66% 14% 13% 6% 42% 9%
3/4 – 7/8 16% 15% 50% 12% 13% 6% 42% 9%
7/8 – 1 16% 15% 50% 12% 13% 6% 42% 9%
1 – 1-1/8 10% 10% 29% 8% 6% 9% 22% 9%
1-1/8 – 1-1/4 10% 10% 29% 8% 6% 9% 22% 9%
1-1/4 – 1-3/8 10% 10% 12% 8% 6% 9% 22% 9%
1-3/8 – 1-1/2 10% 10% 12% 8% 6% 6% 22% 9%
1-1/2 – 1-5/8 0% 1% 7% 8% 3% 14% 10% 4%
1-5/8 – 1-3/4 0% 1% 7% 8% 3% 14% 10% 4%
1-3/4 – 1-7/8 0% 1% 5% 8% 3% 14% 10% 4%
1-7/8 – 2 0% 1% 5% 8% 3% 14% 10% 4%
2+ 0% 1% 2% 7% 1% 10% 6% 3%
1Data are based on comparison among reported mode share data from Safe Routes to School Assessments at Dougherty Elementary School, at Dublin Elementary School, and countywide.
2Data are based on BART’s 2015 Station Access Profiles, available at https://www.bart.gov/about/reports/profile. 3Data are based on NHTS work-based trips from the above-described sample. 4Data are based on NHTS recreational trips from the above-described sample. 5Biking and walking mode share would taper off further at distances greatly exceeding 2 miles, but residents’ access distance as modeled here never greatly exceeds 2 or 3 miles given the size of Dublin. Hence, for simplicity, the outer distance band for this analysis is “2+ miles.” 710
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Schools
The school analysis was conducted based on residential location and school enrollment information provided by the Dublin Unified School District. The data used to calibrate the mode share estimates are provided in Table 4 and Appendix B. The estimated walking and biking mode share by school is presented in Table 5. The perceived walking and biking distances for students at each school, along with mode share estimates, are provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Table 5: Mode Share Estimates by School
School Walking Biking
Share of student
population with bicycle
route available1
Amador Elementary 28% 14% 55%
Cottonwood Creek K-8 35% 7% 27%
Dougherty Elementary 36% 10% 35%
Dublin Elementary 23% 1% 5%
Dublin High 13% 0% 0%
Fallon Middle 23% 2% 8%
Frederiksen Elementary 24% 0% 1%
Green Elementary 31% 6% 22%
Kolb Elementary 37% 14% 53%
Murray Elementary 24% 0% 0%
Wells Middle 16% 0% 0%
1This statistic measures the portion of the population who have a bicycle route available based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities but the Strong and Fearless population rides on all facilities) Source: Prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
711
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Walking
For elementary and middle schools all students are modeled as youth: they do not cross at uncontrolled crossings along major roads. All high school students are modeled as teenage and working age adults:
uncontrolled crossings along major roads are modeled as impediments that increase perceived travel distance but do not fully block access.
Dougherty Elementary exhibits the highest estimated walk share at 36 percent, which is close to the available mode share survey data of 39 percent (see Appendix B). Other elementary schools similarly exhibit high estimated walk shares, due in part to the localized nature of their student population compared to middle and high schools.
The perceived walking distances for students at each school, along with mode share estimates, are provided in Figure 1. Walking access for each school is mapped in Figure W.S.1 through Figure W.S.11 (presented in the Map Figures section).
Biking
All students are assumed to be Interested but Concerned bicyclists because of their age range: the do not ride on LTS 3 or 4 segments. Mode share estimates for each school range between 0 percent and 14 percent. The percentage of students with a complete low-stress biking route from home to school ranged between 0 and 55 percent by school.
The analysis results in a 0 percent biking mode share estimate for Dublin High, Frederiksen Elementary, Murray Elementary, and Wells Middle School. As described already in this memo, this estimate is not intended to claim that zero students ride to school; it is a point estimate based on propensity to bike as a result of infrastructure availability and quality. Biking access to both schools is provided along roadways that have LTS scores of 3 or 4, resulting in a barrier to low-stress access. Reducing LTS along roadways providing access to these two schools hasthe potential to result in a substantial bicycle access mode shift.
The perceived biking distances for students at each school, along with mode share estimates, are provided in Figure 2. Biking access for each school is mapped in Figure B.S. through B.S.11. 712
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 1: Share of School Population by Perceived Walking Distance and Estimated Walking Mode Share 28%
35%
36%
23%
13%
23% 24%
31%
37%
24%
16%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Estimated Walk Share
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi
1/4-3/8 mi
3/8-1/2 mi
1/2-5/8 mi
5/8-3/4 mi
3/4-7/8 mi
7/8-1 mi
>1 mi
Estimated Walk Share
713
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 2: Share of School Population by Perceived Biking Distance and Estimated Biking Mode Share 14%
7%
10%
1%
0%
2%
0%
6%
14%
0% 0%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Estimated Bike Share
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi
1/4-3/8 mi
3/8-1/2 mi
1/2-5/8 mi
5/8-3/4 mi
3/4-7/8 mi
7/8-1 mi
No Low-Stress Bike Route
Estimated Bike Share
714
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
BART
The estimated walking and biking mode shares are presented in Table 6,which shows an estimated 6 percent biking share and 11 percent walking share. BART mode share was estimated for all Dublin adults (16 and above). Access for each resident is determined by the nearest station (West Dublin/Pleasanton or Dublin/Pleasanton); in other words, the analysis measures perceived distance to either station for each resident rather than a specific station. The mode share data used to calibrate estimates are provided in Table 4 and Appendix D.
Table 6: BART Access by Perceived Distance and Bicyclist Type and Estimated Mode Share Estimate Share of Population
Walking 11%
Biking
No Way, No How 0%
Interested but Concerned <1%
Enthused and Confident 36%
Strong and Fearless 52%
Total across all Biker Types 6%
Share of Population with Bicycle Route Available1
31%
1This statistic measures the portion of the population who have a bicycle route available based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities but the Strong and Fearless population rides on all facilities) Note: Population for Analysis includes all Dublin adults (43,491) Source: Prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Walking
Walking analysis was conducted separately for the population between 16 and 55 years old and the population above 56 years and older, with walking barriers modeled differently (as explained in Table 3). The perceived distance to the nearest BART station for Dublin residents is presented in Figure 3. The figure demonstrates that the available walking route for most Dublin residents is outside of a conventional half-mile walk shed.
Walking access to BART is mapped in Figures W.B.1 and W.B.2. 715
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 14
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Biking
The perceived distance to the nearest BART station for Dublin residents is presented in Figure 4. The figure demonstrates that barriers dissuade the assumed Interested but Concerned and Enthused and Confident populations from biking to BART. Among the assumed Strong and Fearless population, 58 percent are within two miles of a BART station. By contrast, LTS 4 facilities are barriers for Enthused and Confident riders, resulting in 72 percent of this population with an available biking route to BART.
For Interested but Concerned riders who are blocked by LTS 3 and 4 facilities, 1 percent have an available biking route to BART. Improving a few key barriers would improve the availability of bicycle routes for these portions of the Dublin population and unlock latent demand. For example, because both BART stations are south of Dublin Boulevard, people biking need to cross or travel along Dublin Boulevard and other nearby arterial segments.
Biking access to BART is mapped in B.B.1 through B.B.3. 716
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. akland, California
Figure 3: Share of Population by Perceived Walking Distance to BART 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi1/4-3/8 mi3/8-1/2 mi1/2-5/8 mi5/8-3/4 mi3/4-7/8 mi 7/8-1 mi
1 - 1 1/8 mi
1 1/8 - 1 1/4 mi1 1/4 - 1 3/8 mi1 3/8 - 1 1/2 mi1 1/2 - 1 5/8 mi1 5/8 - 1 3/4 mi1 3/4 - 1 7/8 mi 1 7/8 - 2 mi
>2 mi
Share of Population by Perceived Distance
Perceived Distance
717
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. akland, California
Figure 4: Share of Population by Perceived Biking Distance to BART 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Interested but Concerned Enthused and Confident Strong and Fearless Share of Population by Perceived Distance
Perceived Distance by Bicyclist Type
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi
1/4-3/8 mi
3/8-1/2 mi
1/2-5/8 mi
5/8-3/4 mi
3/4-7/8 mi
7/8-1 mi
1 - 1 1/8 mi
1 1/8 - 1 1/4 mi
1 1/4 - 1 3/8 mi
1 3/8 - 1 1/2 mi
1 1/2 - 1 5/8 mi
1 5/8 - 1 3/4 mi
1 3/4 - 1 7/8 mi
1 7/8 - 2 mi
>2 mi
No low-stress bike route
718
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Job Centers
Job center mode share estimates are presented for each job center in Table 7. Job center mode share was estimated for all Dublin adults (16 and above). Access to multiple job centers is not a concern for all Dublin residents; each worker typically only commutes to one of these job centers, to another job in Dublin, or to a job outside Dublin. However, access to each job center is analyzed because it is potentially relevant for each Dublin resident or worker (whereas access to job centers in aggregate would not be relevant to any resident or worker). The mode share data used to calibrate estimates are provided Table 4 and are substantiated by citywide commute mode shares based on ACS data as discussed in the June 22 Demographic Analysis memorandum. A map excerpt from that memorandum is shared in Appendix E. The job centers are identified A through G, with each representing the following employers (based on data provided by the City’s Economic Development Department):
• Job Center A: Dublin Blvd & Fallon Rd (Target, Kaiser Permanente, and others) • Job Center B: Dublin Blvd & Dougherty Rd (NCM Demolition and Remediation, North Star Group, Park West, Gold Metal Press, Touch Place, and others) • Job Center C: Dublin Corporate Center (Dublin Blvd & Tassajara Rd) • Job Center D: Gleason Dr/Central Pkwy at Arnold Dr (Ross, Carl Zeiss Meditec, DTI Dental Technologies)
• Job Center E: Dublin Blvd & San Ramon Rd (DeSilva Gates, Hexcel Corporation, Challenge Dairy HQ, Graybar Electric, 580 Executive Center)
• Job Center F: Central Pkwy/Dublin Blvd at Arnold Dr (AEye, Patelco Credit Union, TriNet, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Zeiss Innovation Center) • Job Center G: Hacienda Crossings
The walking share estimates range between 4 and 9 percent per job center, and the bike share estimates range from between 1 and 3 percent. The variability among job centers can be attributed to their locations relative to residential locations within Dublin and the infrastructure immediately surrounding them. For example, Job Center E is located in the western portion of Dublin away from the bulk of residential locations and is accessible via Dublin Boulevard, which includes portions with LTS scores of 3 or 4. The portion of Dublin residents with a low-stress bicycle route available varies between 16 percent (Job Center E) and 37 percent (Job Center B).4 The perceived walking and biking distances for each job center are provided in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Walking access and routes to job centers are presented in Figures W.J.1 through W.J.16. Biking access and routes to job centers are presented in B.J.1 through B.J.7. 4 “Bicycle route available” indicates that a feasible route exists between origin and destination based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities) 719
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 7: Mode Share Estimates by Job Center
School Walking Biking
Share of population with
bicycle route available1
Job Center A: Dublin Blvd & Fallon Rd (Target,
Kaiser Permanente, and others) 8% 2% 18%
Job Center B: Dublin Blvd & Dougherty Rd (NCM
Demolition and Remediation, North Star Group,
Park West, Gold Metal Press, Touch Place, and
others)
8% 3% 37%
Job Center C: Dublin Corporate Center (Dublin
Blvd & Tassajara Rd)
6% 2% 20%
Job Center D: Gleason Dr/Central Pkwy at Arnold
Dr (Ross, Carl Zeiss Meditec, DTI Dental
Technologies)
9% 3% 32%
Job Center E: Dublin Blvd & San Ramon Rd
(DeSilva Gates, Hexcel Corporation, Challenge
Dairy HQ, Graybar Electric, 580 Executive Center)
4% 1% 16%
Job Center F: Central Pkwy/Dublin Blvd at Arnold
Dr (AEye, Patelco Credit Union, TriNet, Alameda
County Sheriff’s Office, Zeiss Innovation Center)
9% 2% 20%
Job Center G: Hacienda Crossings 9% 2% 19%
1This statistic measures the portion of the population who have a bicycle route available based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities but the Strong and Fearless population rides on all facilities) Note: Population for analysis includes all Dublin adults (43,491) Source: Prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
720
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 19
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 5: Share of Population by Perceived Walking Distance to Job Centers 8% 8%
6%
9%
4%
9% 9%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Job Center A Job Center B Job Center C Job Center D Job Center E Job Center F Job Center G Estimated Walk Share
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi
1/4-3/8 mi
3/8-1/2 mi
1/2-5/8 mi
5/8-3/4 mi
3/4-7/8 mi
7/8-1 mi
1 - 1 1/8 mi
1 1/8 - 1 1/4 mi
1 1/4 - 1 3/8 mi
1 3/8 - 1 1/2 mi
1 1/2 - 1 5/8 mi
1 5/8 - 1 3/4 mi
1 3/4 - 1 7/8 mi
1 7/8 - 2 mi
>2 mi
Estimated Walk Share
721
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 20
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 6: Share of Population by Perceived Biking Distance to Job Centers 2%
4%
3%
3%
2%
3%
2%
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
4%
5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Job Center A Job Center B Job Center C Job Center D Job Center E Job Center F Job Center G Estimated Bike Share
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi
1/4-3/8 mi
3/8-1/2 mi
1/2-5/8 mi
5/8-3/4 mi
3/4-7/8 mi
7/8-1 mi
1 - 1 1/8 mi
1 1/8 - 1 1/4 mi
1 1/4 - 1 3/8 mi
1 3/8 - 1 1/2 mi
1 1/2 - 1 5/8 mi
1 5/8 - 1 3/4 mi
1 3/4 - 1 7/8 mi
1 7/8 - 2 mi
>2 mi
No Low-Stress Bike Route
No Way, No How (Would not bike)
Bike Mode Share Estimate
722
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 21
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Parks
Park access and mode share estimates were conducted for all Dublin residents. Access for each resident is determined by the nearest City park; in other words, the analysis measures perceived distance to any park for each resident rather than for a specific one. The mode share data used to calibrate estimates are provided in Table 4 and Appendix D. The estimated walking and biking mode shares are presented in Table 8, which shows an estimated 3 percent biking share and 62 percent walking share. As the results indicate, the ubiquity of parks provides a relatively close park to most Dublin residents.
However, low-stress bicycle routes are not abundant which prevents some residents from having an appropriately low-stress bicycle route to their nearest park.
The perceived walking and biking distances by population are presented in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. The comparative perceived distances illustrate the difference in available walking routes compared to available low-stress bicycle routes.
Table 8:Park Mode Share Estimates
Estimate Share of Population
Walking 62%
Biking 3%
Share of Population with Bicycle Route Available1 42%
1This statistic measures the portion of the population who have a bicycle route available based on LTS rules (e.g., the Interested but Concerned population only rides on LTS 1 or 2 facilities but the Strong and Fearless population rides on all facilities) Note: Population for Analysis includes all Dublin residents (59, 274) Source: Prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Walking access to parks is mapped in Figures W.P.1 and W.P.2. Biking access to parks is mapped in B.P.1 through B.P.3.
723
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 22
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 7: Share of Population by Perceived Walking Distance to Nearest Park 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0-1/8 mi 1/8-1/4
mi
1/4-3/8
mi
3/8-1/2
mi
1/2-5/8
mi
5/8-3/4
mi
3/4-7/8
mi
7/8-1 mi 1 - 1 1/8
mi
1 1/8 - 1
1/4 mi
1 1/4 - 1
3/8 mi
1 3/8 - 1
1/2 mi
1 1/2 - 1
5/8 mi
1 5/8 - 1
3/4 mi
1 3/4 - 1
7/8 mi
1 7/8 - 2
mi
>2 mi
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
Perceived Distance
724
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 23
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Figure 8: Share of Population by Perceived Biking Distance to Nearest Park 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0-1/8 mi
1/8-1/4 mi1/4-3/8 mi3/8-1/2 mi1/2-5/8 mi5/8-3/4 mi3/4-7/8 mi 7/8-1 mi
1 - 1 1/8 mi
1 1/8 - 1 1/4 mi1 1/4 - 1 3/8 mi1 3/8 - 1 1/2 mi1 1/2 - 1 5/8 mi1 5/8 - 1 3/4 mi1 3/4 - 1 7/8 mi 1 7/8 - 2 mi
>2 mi
No Low-Stress
Bike Route
No Way, No How
(Would not bike)
Share of Population at Perceived Distance
Perceived Distance
725
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update Project #: 24392 May 10, 2021 Page 24
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
MAP FIGURES
Schools
Walking: Figures W.S.1-W.S.11 - Each figure illustrates the relevant walking typology group for each school
Biking: Figures W.B. 1-W.S.11 - Each figure illustrates the relevant walking typology group for each school
BART
Walking: Figures W.B.1-W.B.2 -- Each figure illustrates access for one walking age typology group.
Biking: Figures B.B.1-B.B.2 -- Each figure illustrates access for one biking typology group. The No way, no how group is not shown, given that they are assumed not to bike.
Job Centers
Walking: Figures W.J.1-W.J.16 -- Each figure illustrates accessfor one walking age typology groups and one job center. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate Job Center A, 3 and 4 illustrate Job Center B, and so forth.
Biking: Figures B.J.1-B.B.7 -- Each figure illustrates access for one biking typology group and one job center. Figures B.J.1a through B.J.1c illustrate Job Center A, B.J.2a through B.J.2c illustrate Job Center B, and so forth.
Parks
Walking: Figures W.P.1-W.P.2 -- Each figure illustrates access for one walking age typology group.
Biking: Figures B.P.1-B.P.3 -- Each figure illustrates access for one biking typology group. The No way, no how group is not shown, given that they are assumed not to bike. 726
k
k k
MADDEN WY
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
POSITANO PW
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
SEBILLE RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
Emerald Glen Park
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Amador Elem
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.1
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
727
kkk
MADDEN WY
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
POSITANO PW
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
D
R
6TH ST
SEBILLE RD
12TH ST
TOWER RD
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Emerald Glen Park
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Cottonwood Creek
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.2
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
728
k
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Dougherty Elem
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.3
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
729
kk §¨¦680
§¨¦580
B
R
I
G
H
TO
N
DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
TAMARACK
D
R
DAVO NA
D
R
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON DR
SI
E
RRA
LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
W
G
LEA
S
ON
D
R
YOR
K
DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
DOUGHERTY RD
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
8 T
H
S
T
CROMWELL AVRANGE
RD F
C
I
CREEKSIDE DR
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
S
CA
R
L
E
TT
CT
PERSIMMON DR
6 T
H
S
T
7 T
H
S
T
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
1 2TH
ST
TOWER
RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPI
RAT
I
O
N
CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin
Canyon
Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
DublinSports
Grounds
Dougherty
HillsOpen
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
SanRamon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 ElementaryAndMiddleSchoolNetworkServiceAreas:WalkingPerceivedDistances DublinElem
Dublin,California [
FigureW.S.4
Parks
k
SchoolAccessPoints
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+Miles
SchoolSite
730
k k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Frederiksen Elem
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.5
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
731
k
kk k
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MO
N
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Green Elem
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.6
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
732
kkk
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San
Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Kolb Elem
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.7
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
733
§¨¦680
kk
§¨¦580
B
R
IG
H
TO
N
DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
TAMARACK
D
R
DAVO NA
DR
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON DR
SI
E
RRA
LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
W
G
LE
AS
O
N
D
R
YOR
K
DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
DOUGHERTY RD
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8 T
H
S
T
CROMWELL AV
RANGE
RD F
C
I
CREEKSIDE DR
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
S
CA
R
L
E
TTC
T
PERSIMMON DR
6 T
H
S
T
7 T
H
S
T
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
1 2TH
ST
TOWER
RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPI
RAT
I
O
N
CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin
Canyon
Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Emerald
GlenPark
DublinSports
Grounds
Dougherty
HillsOpen
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
SanRamon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 ElementaryAndMiddleSchoolNetworkServiceAreas:WalkingPerceivedDistances MurrayElem
Dublin,California [
FigureW.S.8
Parks
k
SchoolAccessPoints
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+Miles
SchoolSite
734
k
kk k
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Fallon Middle
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.9
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
735
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN W
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
D
R
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_school walk service polygons_elementary and middle_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Elementary And Middle School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Wells Middle
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.10
Parks
k School Access Points
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
School Site
736
k
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMO
N
RD
SIERRA
CT
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\24392_school walk service polygons_high.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 High School Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Dublin High
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.S.11
Parks
k School Access Points
School Site
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
737
kk
k
MAD
D
E
N
W
Y
ARNOLD RD
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
W
G
LE
AS
O
N
D
R
LOCKHART ST
KEEGAN ST
N
DUBLI
NRANCHDR
POSITANO PW
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSI
D
E
D
R
C
O
L
L
I
E
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
8 T
H
S
T
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE
RD F
C
I
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
SEBILLE RD
SYRAH DR
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
EmeraldGlenPark
Fallon
SportsPark
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTSScores
On-StreetLTS
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
ClassIASegment
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
ClassIBSegment
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
PathCrossings
!
LTS1
!
LTS2
!
LTS3
!
LTS4
AmadorElem
NetworkServiceArea
Dublin,California [
FigureB.S.1
k
SchoolAccessPoints
SchoolSite
AccessDistance
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+miles
738
kk
k
MAD
D
E
N
W
Y
ARNOLD RD
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
W
GL
EA
SO
N
D
R
LOCKHART ST
KEEGAN ST
N
DUBLI
NRANCHDR
POSITANO PW
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSI
D
E
D
R
C
O
L
L
I
E
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
8 T
H
S
T
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE
RD F
C
I
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
SCAR
L
ETTC
T
PERSIMMON DR
6 T
H
S
T
SEBILLE RD
1 2TH
ST
TOWER
RD
EAGLE RD
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
CREEKVIEW DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
STERLING RD
EmeraldGlenPark
Fallon
SportsPark
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTSScores
On-StreetLTS
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
ClassIASegment
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
ClassIBSegment
LTS1
LTS2
LTS3
LTS4
PathCrossings
!
LTS1
!
LTS2
!
LTS3
!
LTS4
CottonwoodCreek
NetworkServiceArea
Dublin,California [
FigureB.S.2
k
SchoolAccessPoints
SchoolSite
AccessDistance
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+miles
739
k
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Dougherty Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.3
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
740
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
RD
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Dublin Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.4
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
741
k k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Frederiksen Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.5
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
742
k
kk k
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Green Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.6
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
743
kkk
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San
Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Kolb Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.7
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
744
§¨¦680 kk
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Emerald
Glen Park
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Murray Elem
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.8
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
745
k
kk k
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Fallon Middle
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.9
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
746
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECO
AC
H
R
D
MADDEN W
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH
DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Wells Middle
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.10
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
747
k
k
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
YORK DR
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_school service polygons.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Dublin High
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.S.11
k School Access Points
School Site
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
748
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
k kkk
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\24392_bart walk service polygons_working age.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 BART Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances BART Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.B.1
Parks
k BART Access
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
749
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
k kkk
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\24392_bart walk service polygons_youth and elderly.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 BART Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances BART Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.B.2
Parks
k BART Access
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
750
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
k kk
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_bart bike service polygons_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
BART Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.B.1
k Bart access points
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
751
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
k kk
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_bart bike service polygons_enthused_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
BART Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.B.2
k Bart access points
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
752
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
k kk
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_bart bike service polygons_interested_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
BART Access - "Interested but Concerned"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.B.3
k Bart access points
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
753
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
kkk
k k
ivic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
erty Hills
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
A
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center A Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.1a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
754
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
kkk
k k
ivic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
erty Hills
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
A
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center A Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.1b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
755
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECO
AC
H RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERG
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
ART ST
YORK DR
KEEG
AN ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
GHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE DR
SAN
RAMO
N
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
k
k
k k
kk
k
k
k
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
B
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center B Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.2a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
756
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECO
AC
H RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERG
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
ART ST
YORK DR
KEEG
AN ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
GHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE DR
SAN
RAMO
N
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
k
k
k k
kk
k
k
k
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
B
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center B Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.2b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
757
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
C
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center C Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.3a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
758
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
C
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center C Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.3b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
759
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYO
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
n Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
D
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center D Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.4a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
760
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAM
ON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYO
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
n Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
D
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center D Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.4b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
761
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
B
R
I
GH
TO
N
DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
TAMARACK
D
R
DAVO NA
D
R
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON DR
SI
E
RRA
LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
GL
EA
SO
N
YOR
K
DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
DOUGHERTY RD
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
8 T
H
S
T
F
C
I
CREEKSIDE DR
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
S
CA
R
L
E
TTC
T 6T
H
S
T
7 T
H
S
T
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
1 2TH
ST
HILLROSE DR
INSPI
RAT
I
O
N
CI
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
INSPIRAT I ON DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
STERLING RD
k
k
Martin
Canyon
Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
CivicPlaza
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
HillsOpen
Space
E
E
Pleasanton
Hayward
Alameda
County
SanRamon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 JobCenterNetworkServiceAreas:WalkingPerceivedDistances
JobCenterEAccess-14to55YearsOld
Dublin,California [
FigureW.J.5a
Parks
k
JobAccessPoints
JobCenterPolygons
Sidewalkgaponmajorroad
MajorStreets(CrossingBarriersPresent)
AccessDistance
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+Miles
762
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
B
R
I
GH
TO
N
DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
TAMARACK
D
R
DAVO NA
D
R
SILVERGATE DR
BANDON DR
SI
E
RRA
LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
GL
EA
SO
N
YOR
K
DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
DOUGHERTY RD
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
8 T
H
S
T
F
C
I
CREEKSIDE DR
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
P
W
S
CA
R
L
E
TTC
T 6T
H
S
T
7 T
H
S
T
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
1 2TH
ST
HILLROSE DR
INSPI
RAT
I
O
N
CI
B
R
O
D
E
R
B
L
INSPIRAT I ON DR
D
U
B
L
I
N
B
L
STERLING RD
k
k
Martin
Canyon
Creek Trail
Alamo Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
CivicPlaza
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
HillsOpen
Space
E
E
Pleasanton
Hayward
Alameda
County
SanRamon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 JobCenterNetworkServiceAreas:WalkingPerceivedDistances
JobCenterEAccess-Over55YearsOld
Dublin,California [
FigureW.J.5b
Parks
k
JobAccessPoints
JobCenterPolygons
Sidewalkgaponmajorroad
MajorStreets(CrossingBarriersPresent)
AccessDistance
0-1/4miles
1/4-1/2miles
1/2-1mile
1-1-1/2miles
1-1/2-2miles
2+Miles
763
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
F
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center F Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.6a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
764
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
F
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center F Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.6b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
765
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k k k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
G
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center G Access - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.7a
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
766
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
k
k
k k k
k
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Civic Plaza
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty Hills
Open Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
G
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job walk service polygons_elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Job Center Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Job Center G Access - Over 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.J.7b
Parks
k Job Access Points
Job Center Polygons
Sidewalk gap on major road
Major Streets (Crossing Barriers Present)
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
767
k
kkk
k k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
ACCESS ROAD
5TH ST
EVANS AV
B
LA VINA ST
ARNET BL
CROAK RD
E SUGAR HILL TE
12TH ST
FCI
AVANTI AV
6TH ST
BRANDINI DR
8TH ST
ASPEN ST
RANGE RD
DAVIS AV
ADAMS AV
SMITH AV
RIMINI LN
FORINO DR
TOYOTA DR
KINGSMILL TE
SEBILLE RD
BELLEVUE CI
MADIGAN RD
GLEASONDR
ALBROOK DR
PORCELLANO WY
CAMP PARKS BL
HACIENDA CROSSING
VALLEY VISTA DR
CREEKVIEW DR
A
HACIENDA DR
KOHNEN WY
TASSAJARA RD
BRANNIGAN ST
S DUBLIN RANCH DR
DUBLIN BL ARNOLD RD
LA STRADA
DR
WILDWOOD RD
STERLING ST
CENTRAL PW
LOCKHART ST
BENT TREE DR
KEEGAN ST
POSITANO PW
CREEKVIEW DR
DOUGHERTY RD
MARTINELLI WY
SCARLETT CT
ANTONE WY
DUBLIN CT
SCARLETT DR
FALLON RD
GLEASON DR
VITTORIA LP
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon A Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.1a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
768
k
kkk
k k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
A
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon A Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.1b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
769
k
kkk
k k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
MADDEN WY
SIERRA LN
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
A
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon A Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.1c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
770
k
k
k
k k
kk
kk
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERG
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
ART ST
YORK DR
KEEG
AN ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
GHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE DR
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
MONROE AV
H AVE N P L
KINGSMILL TE
6TH ST
RIMINI LN
RIDGELINE DR
SEBILLE RD
BELLEVUECI MADIGAN RD
N LAKE DR
HACIENDA CROSSING
ALBROOK DR
B
SOUTHWICK DR
W VOMAC RD
N
DUBLIN
RANCH
DR
DUBLIN BL
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon B Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.2a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
771
k
k
k
k k
kk
kk
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERG
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
ART ST
YORK DR
KEEG
AN ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
GHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE DR
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
B
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon B Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.2b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
772
k
k
k
k k
kk
kk
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVERG
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
ART ST
YORK DR
KEEG
AN ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
GHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE DR
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BARNET BL
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin
Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports
Park
B
Pleasanton
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon B Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.2c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
773
k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
5TH ST
Sports Park
EVANS AV
LA VINA ST
TOPAZ CI
H AVE N P L
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
E SUGAR HILL T
12TH
E
ST
FCI
AVANTI AV
6TH ST
9TH ST
BRANDINI DR
CIVIC PZ
8TH ST
TALLE WY
JADE CI
COTTONWOOD CI
S SPAGO DR
DAVIS AV
ADAMS AV
SMITH AV
RIMINI LN
LIMERICK AV
BEVERLY LN
MAPLE DR
DIANA LN
FORINO DR
NLAKE DR
TOYOTA DR
BRISTOL RD
KINGSMILL TE
SEBILLE RD
S LAKE DR
ALBROOK DR
BELLEVUE C
QU
I
ARTZ CI
MADIGAN RD
GLEASONDR
PORCELLANO WY
CAMP PARKS BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HACIENDA CROSSING
VALLEY VISTA DR
C
TASSAJARA RD
HACIENDA DR
KOHNEN WY
PENN DR
BRIGHTON DR
BRANNIGAN ST
VILLAGE PW
S DUBLIN RANCH DR
SUMMER GLEN DR
DUBLIN BL ARNOLD RD
LA STRADA
DR
WILDWOOD
RD
IRONHORSE PW
STERLING ST
CENTRAL PW
LOCKHART ST
BENT TREE DR
KEEGAN ST
POSITANO PW
CREEKVIEW DR
DOUGHERTY RD
MARTINELLI WY
SCARLETT CT
GLYNNIS ROSE DR
ANTONE WY
DUBLIN CT
SCARLETT DR
FALLON RD
GLEASON DR
AMADOR PLAZA RD
VITTORIA LP
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon C Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.3a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
774
k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECO
AC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
C
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon C Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.3b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
775
k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
C
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon C Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.3c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
776
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMO
N
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYO
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
n Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
MONROE AV
H AVE N P L
KINGSMILL TE
6TH ST
COTTONWOOD CI
RIMINI LN
SEBILLE RD
BELLEVUE CI
MADIGAN RD
GLEASONDR
N LAKE DR
HACIENDA CROSSING
ALBROOK DR
D
DUBLIN BL
SOUTHWICK DR
S DUBLIN RANCH DR
W VOMAC RD
BRANNIGAN ST
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon D Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.4a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
777
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYO
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
n Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
D
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon D Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.4b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
778
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVER
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
ARN
OLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMO
N
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYO
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
ALBRO
OK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G RD
n Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
D
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra Costa County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon D Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.4c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
779
kk
!
! !
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
D
R
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
GLEASON
YORK DR
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFE
R
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
Hills Open Space
MONROE AV
6TH ST
REIMERS WY
COTTONWOOD CI
RIDGELINE DR
GLEASONDR
E
E
W VOMAC RD
SOUTHWICK
DR
IRONHORSE PW
DUBLIN BL
§¨¦580
§¨¦680
Pleasanton
Hayward
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon E Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.5a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
780
kk
!
! !
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
GLEASON
YORK DR
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
E
E
Pleasanton
Hayward
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon E Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.5b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
781
kk
!
! !
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
D
R
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
GLEASON
YORK DR
DUBLIN BL
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFE
R
RANCH
RD
8TH ST
FCI
CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
E
E
Pleasanton
Hayward
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon E Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.5c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
782
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
MONROE AV
OXFORDCI
H AVEN P L
KINGSMILL TE
6TH ST
COTTONWOOD CI
RIMINI LN
SEBILLE RD
S LAKE DR
BELLEVUE CI
MADIGAN RD
GLEASONDR
N LAKE DR
HACIENDA CROSSING
ALBROOK DR
F
DUBLIN BL
SOUTHWICK DR
S DUBLIN RANCH DR
W VOMAC RD IRONHORSE PW
BRANNIGAN ST
GLYNNIS ROSE DR
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon F Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.6a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
783
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
F
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon F Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.6b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
784
k k
k
k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SILVE
R
G
ATE
DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HER
T
Y
R
D
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
D
O
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TA
S
S
AJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BAR
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
RANGE RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
F
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon F Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.6c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
785
k
k
k kk k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
ACCESS ROAD
MONROE AV
H AVE N P L
KINGSMILL TE
6TH ST
COTTONWOOD CI
RIMINI LN
SEBILLE RD
S LAKE DR
BELLEVUECI
MADIGAN RD
GLEASONDR
ALBROOK DR
N LAKE DR
HACIENDA CROSSING
G
DUBLIN BL
S DUBLIN RANCH DR
BRANNIGAN ST
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\5-2021 update\24392_job service polygon_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path LTS Crossings
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon G Access - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.7a
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
786
k
k
k kk k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOC
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
G
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygons_enthused.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon G Access - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.7b
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
787
k
k
k kk k
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC
R
D
STAGECOAC
H
R
D
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVONA DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN
DR
A
R
N
OLD
R
D
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LO
C
K
H
A
R
T ST
YORK DR
KEEG
A
N ST
N DUBLINRANCH
D
R
D
O
U
G
HERT
Y RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DO
N
O
H
UE D
R
SAN
RAMON
RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLO
N
R
D
TASSAJA
R
A
R
D
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CRO
M
WELL AV
BA
R
NET
BL
CRO
AK RD
FCI
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIM
MON
DR
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
12TH ST
HILLROSE DR
BRODER BL
CREEKVIEW DR
DUBLIN BL
STERLIN
G
R
D
Alamo
Canal
Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Dublin Sports
Grounds
Emerald
Glen Park
Dougherty
Hills Open
Space
Fallon
Sports Park
G
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\bike demand analysis results maps\24392_job service polygon_interested.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Job Center Polygon G Access - "Interested but Concerned" Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.J.7c
k Job access points
Job Center Polygons
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ miles
788
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
k
k kk k
k k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k k
k
k
kkk
kkk
k
kk
kk
kk
k
kkk
k
kk k
kk k
kk
kk
k
k
kk
k k
k
k k
kk
kk k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
kkk
k
Martin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_park walk service polygons_working age_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Park Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Neighborhood and Community Parks - 14 to 55 Years Old
Dublin, California
[
Figure W.P.1
k Park Access Points
Sidewalk gap on major
road
Major Streets (Crossing
Barriers Present)
Parks
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
789
k
k kk k
k k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k k
k
k
kkk
kkk
k
kk
kk
kk
k
kkk
k
kk k
kk k
kk
kk
k
k
kk
k k
k
k k
kk
kk k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
kkk
k
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING RD
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_park walk service polygons_youth and elderly_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 Park Network Service Areas: Walking Perceived Distances Neighborhood and Community Parks - Under 14 and Over 55 Years Old Dublin, California
[
Figure W.P.2
k Park Access Points
Sidewalk gap on major
road
Major Streets (Crossing
Barriers Present)
Parks
Access Distance
0 - 1/4 miles
1/4 - 1/2 miles
1/2 - 1 mile
1 - 1-1/2 miles
1-1/2 - 2 miles
2+ Miles
790
k k
k
k k
k k
k k
k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k k k
k
k
k k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k k
k
k
k kk
kk k
k
k k
k
k
kk
k
kkk
k
kk k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
§¨¦
kk
680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_park bike service polygons_strong_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Parks - "Strong and Fearless"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.P.1
BART Stations
k Park Access Points
Parks
791
k k
k
k k
k k
k k
k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k k k
k
k
k k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k k
k
k
k kk
kk k
k
k k
k
k
kk
k
kkk
k
kk k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
§¨¦
kk
680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_park bike service polygons_enthused_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Parks - "Enthused and Confident"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.P.2
BART Stations
k Park Access Points
Parks
792
k k
k
k k
k k
k k
k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k k k
k
k
k k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
kk
k
k
k k
k
k
k kk
kk k
k
k k
k
k
kk
k
kkk
k
kk k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
k
§¨¦
kk
680
§¨¦580
BRIGHTON DR
VOMAC RD
STAGECOACH RD
MADDEN WY
TAMARACK DR
DAVO NA DR
SI VL ERGATE DR
BANDON
DR
SIERRA LN
HANSEN DR
ARNOLD RD
CENTRAL PW
GLEASON DR
LOCKHART ST
YORK DR
KEEGAN ST
N DUBLINRANCHDR
DUBLIN BL
DOUGHERTY RD
POSITANO PW
VILLAGE PW
DONOHUE DR
SAN RAMON RD
SIERRA
CT
FALLON RD
TASSAJARA RD
NORTHSIDE DR
AMADOR VALLEY BL
SCHAEFER RANCH RD
COLLIER CANYON RD
8TH ST
CROMWELL AV
BARNET BL
CROAK RD
RANGE RD
FCI CREEKSIDE DR
HORIZON PW
SCARLETT CT
PERSIMMON DR
ALLEY
6TH ST
7TH ST
SEBILLE RD
SCARLETT DR
PALISADES DR
12TH ST
TOWER RD
SYRAH DR
HILLROSE DR
INSPIRATION CI
ALBROOK DR
EAGLE RD
BRODER BL
INSPIRAT I ON DR
CREEKVIEW DR
HILLTOP RD
DUBLIN BL
STERLING R
Ma
D
rtin Canyon Creek Trail
Alamo
Canal Trail
Iron Horse Trail
Pleasanton
Livermore
Alameda
County
San Ramon
Contra
Costa
County
H:\24\24392 - Dublin ATP\gis\Task 3\3.3.4 Latent Demand\pedestrian demand results maps\5-2021 update\24392_park bike service polygons_interested_5-2021.mxd Date: 5/10/2021 LTS Scores
On-Street LTS
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IA Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Class IB Segment
LTS 1
LTS 2
LTS 3
LTS 4
Path Crossings
! LTS 1
! LTS 2
! LTS 3
! LTS 4
Parks - "Interested but Concerned"
Network Service Area
Dublin, California
[
Figure B.P.3
BART Stations
k Park Access Points
Parks
793
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
NETWORK
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PRIORITIZATION
FRAMEWORK
APPENDIX C
794
FILENAME: H:\24\24392 - DUBLIN ATP\TASK 4 - NETWORK RECS & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN\4.1 DEVELOP PRIORITIZATION FRAMEWORK\24392_DUBLIN BPMP_PRIORITIZATION FRAMEWORK_20210202.DOCX
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 20, 2021 Project #: 24392
To: Sai Midididdi, TE
City of Dublin
From: Amanda Leahy, AICP; Mike Alston, RSP, Camilla Dartnell Project: Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Subject: Draft Prioritization Framework
INTRODUCTION
The City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update (Plan) will provide recommendations and an implementation framework to support the maintenance and improvement of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, policies, and programs in the City. Planned infrastructure improvements should connect users with key destinations – schools, transit connections, parks, trails, and commercial destinations including job centers—within the City and in adjacent jurisdictions. A spatial evaluation and prioritization of roads and paths in the City can determine which can provide the greatest potential benefit to help meet Plan goals.
This memorandum outlines the process for this prioritization. This memorandum includes the following sections:
• Prioritization Process
• Proposed Factors and Variables
• Public Input
• Factor Weights
• Criteria Scaling
• Criteria Methodology
The process outlined in this memorandum will produce evaluation scores for roadway segments for each variable identified. The factor weights outlined in this memorandum will then be applied and each segment will receive one combined evaluation score, allowing for comparison of every roadway and path segment in the City.
795
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 2
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
The evaluation scores will provide an understanding of the priority of each segment based on the selected factors but will not consider feasibility or constructability. During post processing, the team will identify general trends in the prioritization scores and consider context to “smooth” the results into project corridors. Feasibility and constructability will be considered in subsequent Tasks 4.2, Identify Network Recommendations and 4.4, Develop Implementation Plan, during the project creation process.
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
The proposed evaluation process is informed by the framework from NCHRP Report 803: ActiveTrans Priority Tool1(APT), the result of a national research effort. The APT methodology was based on an extensive review of existing prioritization processes being used by agencies across the country at the state, regional, and local level. It uses a standard set of terms and definitions to describe the different steps in the process. The following definitions apply within the APT:
• Factors are the categories used to express community or agency values considered in the prioritization process and contain groups of variables with similar characteristics. The APT has selected nine primary factors commonly used by agencies across the country that are particularly suited for prioritization of active transportation needs. • Weights are the numbers used to indicate the relative importance of different factors based on community or agency values. In order to increase transparency and legibility in the weighting step, weights are applied to factors, not to variables (which are often much more technical in nature).
• Variables are characteristics of roadways, households, neighborhood areas, and other features that can be measured, organized under each factor. The terms variables and evaluation criteria may be used interchangeably.
• Scaling is the process of making two variables comparable to one another (e.g., number of collisions versus population density.)
The APT outlines the 10-step process (described below) in two phases:
• Scoping, (steps 1-6) in which the prioritization purpose is established, factors and variables are selected, and data resources are assessed; and
• Prioritization, (steps 7-10) in which data is organized, scaling is applied, and prioritization scores are calculated.
1 Lagerwey, Peter A., et al. Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Priority Tool Guidebook. NCHRP Report 803. Project No. 07-17. 2015. Available online at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_803.pdf 796
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
The process is often iterative, as agencies may find a need to substitute variables if they find a lack of data availability.
The Steps are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Prioritization Steps
Phase Step
Scoping
Step 1: Define Purpose
Step 2: Select Factors
Step 3: Establish Weights
Step 4: Select Variables
Step 5: Assess Data Availability
Step 6: Assess Technical Resources
Prioritization
Step 7: Set up Prioritization Tool
Step 8: Input Data
Step 9: Scale the Variables
Step 10: Calculate Priority Scores
Source: NCHRP Report 803
Although all steps in this 10-step process will be performed, this memorandum focuses on Step 2:
Selecting Factors, Step 3: Establishing Weights, Step 4: Selecting Variables, and Step 9: Scaling the Variables.
The team has already completed Step 1: Define Purpose through plan scoping, and the team has completed Step 5: Assess Data Availability and Step 6: Assess Resources through other plan development efforts so far. The recommended factors and variables have been chosen with consideration of available data and resources. Steps 7, 8, and 10 are straightforward spreadsheet exercises that implement the decisions documented in this memorandum in the spreadsheet. 797
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Step 1: Define Purpose
An agency first determines the purpose of the prioritization. In this step, an agency selects the mode they would like to prioritize; decides whether they are prioritizing specific projects, generalized needs, or something between the two; and defines the extent and number of the improvement locations.
For the Plan, the process will be applied separately for bicycle and pedestrian modes along roadway segments and off-street segments like paths. Paths will be included in both bicycle and pedestrian modes. The process prioritizes generalized needs, which will result in each segment receiving its own score. The team will use that score to inform selection of corridors for improvement during post processing.
Step 2: Select Factors
An agency next selects the factors to be used in prioritization that align with their goals for the prioritization process. The factors included in the APT are as follows:
1. Stakeholder input;
2. Costs and/or legal constraints;
3. Opportunities;
4. Safety;
5. Existing conditions;
6. Demand;
7. Connectivity;
8. Equity; and
9. Compliance with standards/plans.
Agencies can select anywhere from one to nine factors in their prioritization. Depending on their prioritization purpose, some factors may be less relevant or not relevant.
This evaluation will utilize a subset of the APT factors. Recommended factors are included in Table 2 of this document.
Step 3: Establish Weights
Each factor is weighted on a scale of 1 to 10 to indicate its relative importance to other factors. The selected weights are ultimately used in calculating the prioritization score. Agencies can revisit the weights at any point in the process.
798
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
For this plan, weights are recommended to be established through a process of input from the project management team, Technical Advisory Committee, and stakeholders.
Step 4: Select Variables
For each selected factor, agencies can select one or more variables. Each selected factor must have at least one variable by which it is measured. Using multiple variables will decrease the relative impact of each variable for that factor in the prioritization process unless the factor weighting is also increased.
This memorandum recommends variables in Table 2 of this document.
Step 5: Assess Data Availability
The availability of data is a critical consideration in determining what variables to include in a prioritization exercise, and data availability varies substantially across cities, towns, counties, MPOs, and state DOTs.
Through the variable selection process and methodology creation, the team simultaneously performed step 5, assessing data availability, to ensure each criterion could be evaluated as proposed.
Step 6: Assess Technical Resources
Agencies assess their existing technical resources and capabilities to determine if existing resources are sufficient, or if new resources will be needed to complete their intended prioritization with the selected variables. In step 6, agencies also select their technological platform for performing the calculations – using the APT spreadsheet tool, a different spreadsheet, a GIS database, manual tabulation, or other method(s).
The Plan’s process will use the APT spreadsheet tool, informed by GIS-based calculations for each evaluation criterion.
Step 7: Set up Prioritization Tool
Having established the purpose, factors, variables and required data, the next step is to set up a tool to implement the prioritization method.
The Plan will use the APT pre-programmed spreadsheet tool, with separate versions for each mode.2The raw version of the spreadsheet will be provided with this memorandum. 2 The spreadsheet tool is available online at http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/172459.aspx. 799
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Step 8: Input Data
Next, agencies input data into the prioritization tool. Depending on the variables, agencies may need to do additional calculations or assessments outside the prioritization spreadsheet tool to calculate or measure the correct value for each improvement location.
The Plan’s process will conduct a GIS-based spatial analysis to calculate values for each variable prior to inputting the data into the spreadsheet tool.
Step 9: Scale the Variables
Scaling involves selecting a common numeric scale and adjusting raw values to fit the common scale.
Scaling should not be confused with weighting. Scaling is a more objective, technical function, while weighting is based on community/agency values. Scaling is necessary so that variables have a comparable impact on the prioritization score in the absence of weighting. Different scaling methods, such as proportional and rank order, can produce different results. Scaling methods should be chosen carefully depending on the distribution and range of the data points.
The proposed scaling method for each variable will ultimately depend on the variable’s range of calculated values, but an initial recommendation is provided for each variable in this document.
Step 10: Calculate Priority Scores
Finally, agencies sum the weighted values for each factor to derive a total score for each segment. The segments can then be ranked based on the prioritization score. In some cases, agencies may wish to revisit factors, variables, and/or weighting, and make adjustments to their prioritization based on additional input or evolving prioritization purposes.
Although all steps in this 10-step process will be performed through the development of this Plan, this memorandum focuses on selecting factors, selecting variables, establishing weights, and scaling the variables. Through the variable selection process and methodology creation, the team simultaneously performed step 5, assessing data availability, to ensure each criterion could be evaluated as proposed.
PROPOSED FACTORS AND VARIABLES
To select prioritization factors and variables, the team reviewed NCHRP Report 803 and this Plan’s goals. Table 2Table 2: Proposed Prioritization Factors and provides a summary of the selected factors and criteria, includes brief notes, and indicates to which mode each criterion can be applied. 800
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 7
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 2: Proposed Prioritization Factors and Variables
Factor Variable Notes Pedestrian Bicycle
Safety
HighInjury
Corridors
This criterion will prioritize locations based on network screening analysis of bicycle- and pedestrian-related
collisions. The network screening was conducted in Task 2 of the project. This variable aligns with the goal
enhance safety.
X X
Social
Equity
Youth
population
and senior
population
Use variables from Census data at the block group level as indicators. This variable aligns with the goals improve connectivity and enhance accessibility.
X X
Connectivity
Demand
Analysis
Identify top bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure elements that would unlock latent demand (results of demand
analysis). This variable aligns with the goal improve
connectivity.
X X
Proximity
to Schools
Identify roadways within 1 mile of schools to provide
increased opportunities to bike and walk to school.
This variable aligns with the goal improve connectivity.
X X
Quality of
Service
Bicycle
Level of
Traffic
Stress
Prioritize locations based on the presence of existing
high-stress riding facilities. This variable aligns with the goal increase walking and biking.
X
Sidewalk
gaps
Identify locations with sidewalk gaps that may create
barriers for those walking. This variable aligns with the goal improve connectivity.
X
Major
Barriers
Freeway
crossings
Prioritize improving safety and quality of service for ramp terminal intersection and freeway crossings. This variable aligns with the goal improve connectivity.
X X
Consistency
with Past
Planning
Previously
identified
projects
Prioritize pedestrian and bicycle projects that were
identified in the previous plan. This variable aligns with the goal prioritize investments.
X X
801
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 8
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
PUBLIC INPUT
Understanding and addressing the needs and concerns of the public is a key step in creating a successful plan representative of the needs and values of the community. The nature of the public feedback requires qualitative integration into the project. After the quantitative analysis is complete through the application of the evaluation criteria identified above, the team will perform a “smoothing” process to identify the overall future walking and biking corridors that form the basis for project identification.
During this process, the team will refer to the public input and the quantitative evaluation in determining which areas are priority corridors and where those corridors start and end.
FACTOR WEIGHTS
Factor weights allow different factors to be given different emphasis in the prioritization process.
Factors that are deemed to be more important may be given higher weight than other factors to create this emphasis in the scoring process. Scaled variable scores are averaged for each factor and multiplied by the factor weight to get the final prioritization score for each segment.
For this plan, weights are recommended to be established through a process of input from the Technical Advisory Committee and the public. Input received from each group will be averaged to get a recommended set of weights for each group (Project Management Team, Technical Advisory Committee, and the public). These will then be averaged to determine the overall final weighting to be applied.
Table 3: Example Factor Weights
Factor Variables
Equal
Weights
Other Options
Safety High-Injury Corridors 10
Averaged weights
from Project
Management
Team, Technical
Advisory
Committee, and
the public
Social Equity Youth and senior populations 10
Connectivity
Demand Analysis 10
Proximity to Schools 10
Quality of Service
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
10 Sidewalk Gaps
Major Barriers Freeway crossings 10
Consistency with Past
Planning
Previously identified projects 10
802
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
SCALING
NCHRP Report 803 provides guidance on adjusting raw values for a given variable (criterion) to fit a common scale. There are multiple ways to adjust the values to fit the scale, depending on the distribution of the data and relative importance of the values. NCHRP Report 803 distinguishes the adjustment methods based on their appropriateness for addressing outliers. Two primary methods will be used in this project to adjust raw values to fit the selected common scale of 0 to 10. Each is described below. Scaling should be refined when evaluation scores are received depending on the range of scores, but a preliminary recommendation for scoring each criterion is included in the Proposed Methodologies section of this document.
Each scaling mechanism has an associated inverse scaling mechanism, where the same scoring method is applied but the scaling considers lower scores as having a higher scaled value. An example of when this may be applied is when a roadway segment near an essential destination should be prioritized over one far from an essential destination, and the evaluation is being performed based on distance to the destination. An inverse scaling mechanism can be used to provide higher scaled values to those with shorter distances and lower raw input values than those farther away.
Proportionate and Inverse Proportionate Scaling
▪ Appropriate for data without outliers.
▪ Raw values are adjusted proportionately to fit the common scale. ▪ The highest value in the common scale is assigned to the highest raw value and the lowest value in the common scale is assigned to the lowest raw value. The raw values in between are scaled proportionately based on their relationship to the highest and lowest raw values. ▪ Y = (X - MIN)/(MAX - MIN) × S, where Y is the scaled value, X is the raw value, MIN is the minimum raw value, MAX is the maximum raw value, and S is the scale. ▪ Zero values may be excluded and assigned a value of zero or included in the calculation and scaled.
Rank Order Scaling and Inverse Rank Order Scaling
▪ Appropriate for data with outliers.
▪ Raw values are ranked and then scaled proportionately to fit the selected scale. ▪ Zero values may be excluded and assigned a value of zero or included in the calculation and scaled.
▪ Example from NCHRP 803:
803
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Note: In this example, the minimum raw value is 0 and the maximum raw value is 32. 32 is also an outlier, since it is more than three times larger than the next highest raw value. To address this, the values are ranked from low to high (i.e. the lowest value gets a rank of 1, next lowest value gets a rank of 2, and so on). The ranked values are then scaled proportionately.
Quantile Scaling and Inverse Quantile Scaling
▪ Appropriate for data with outliers.
▪ Raw values are grouped into equal groups with the same number of values and then those groups, or quantiles, are scaled proportionately to fit the selected scale Non-Linear Scaling and Inverse Non-Linear Scaling
▪ Not appropriate for data with outliers.
▪ Appropriate when the importance of raw numeric values increases in a non-linear fashion 804
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 11
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
PROPOSED METHODOLOGIES
This section provides details and outlines the methodologies and recommended scaling for applying each evaluation criterion.
Safety: High-Injury Corridors
Variable High-Injury Corridors
Factor Safety
Description The team conducted a collision analysis in Task 3 of this plan production to identify the high injury network based on collision history and trends. The team evaluated bicycle and pedestrian involved crash data from 2014 through 2019 on public streets within the city, excluding freeways, using an Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) analysis. This EPDO analysis considered fatal and severe injury collisions to be worth 10 equivalent PDOs, moderate and minor injury collisions to be worth 5 equivalent PDOs, and PDO collisions to be worth 1 equivalent PDO. The team then selected approximately the top 10 percent of roadways to be included in the high injury network as high injury corridors.
Data Needs Bicycle and pedestrian high injury network results Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for the bicycle and pedestrian analysis, but due to different pedestrian and bicycle equivalent PDO scores, results for each mode may be different.
Proposed
Methodology
The EPDO analysis scores will be applied to each roadway segment in the City.
For paths that intersect roadways, each path will be given the score equivalent to the intersecting roadway, for a half mile segments around the intersection.
Limitations Bicycle and pedestrian crashes may be lower or not reported on shared use paths.
The methodology applies the intersecting roadway score to the segments on the path within one half mile of the intersection to try to account for this and the crashes that may occur at the intersection of the path and road, but for path segments not near an intersection, the maximum score a path can receive is lower than the maximum score for roadway segments.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate
805
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 12
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Social Equity: Youth and Senior Population
Variable Youth and Senior Populations
Factor Social Equity
Description This criterion identifies areas with higher concentrations of youth and senior populations, designed to help prioritize improvements on highway segments that serve areas with populations with higher propensity to bike and walk and of greater need for comfortable infrastructure.
Data Needs Most recent available American Community Survey data at the block group level for the following attributes:
▪ Elderly populations (65 and older)
▪ Youth populations (under 18)
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for the bicycle and pedestrian analysis, and because the data used will not vary by mode, the results of this criterion will be the same for each mode.
Proposed
Methodology
This criterion will be calculated at the census block group level as the sum of people 65 and older and 17 and younger divided by total block group population.
The equation used to develop the segment score is shown below:
𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 =
(𝐸𝑙𝑑 + 𝑌𝑡ℎ)
𝑃𝑜𝑝
where:
Eld = # of residents over 65
Yth = # of residents under 18
Pop = Total population
Limitations This criterion does not include other available indicators of transportation disadvantage, including but not limited to income or poverty status, disability status, English proficiency, car ownership, or race. Through the demographic analysis conducted in Task 3 and subsequent discussion with the City, it was determined that such trends do not show substantial spatial variation within the City, so they are not incorporated into this prioritization.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate
806
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Connectivity: Demand Analysis
Variable Demand Analysis
Factor Connectivity
Description The team performed a demand analysis in Task 3 of Plan production. This demand analysis identifies baseline levels of walking and biking around existing activity nodes and assesses latent bicycle and pedestrian demand that could be realized through the Plan.
Data Needs Task 3 Demand Analysis results
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for the bicycle and pedestrian analysis, but due to different pedestrian and bicycle demand scores, results for each mode may be different.
Proposed
Methodology
The team will conduct a work session with the City to consider the results of the demand analysis and determine the most high-leverage segments or intersections to improve to provide better connectivity. Segments identified as priority demand segments will receive 1 point, while all other segments will receive 0 points.
Limitations Simplifying the results of the demand analysis can allow for an easy to understand application, but it does not differentiate between areas that provide moderate but different levels of connectivity.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
807
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 14
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Connectivity: Proximity to Schools
Variable Proximity to Schools
Factor Connectivity
Description Schools are an essential destination and are especially important for providing low stress biking and walking facilities. School districts are generally determined by location, increasing the opportunity for many students to bike and walk to school, but because most students are youth, they require less stressful facilities to bike and walk safely and comfortably.
Data Needs School locations
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for the bicycle and pedestrian analysis, and because the data used will not vary by mode, the results of this criterion will be the same for each mode.
Proposed
Methodology
The team will create a 1-mile buffer around each school. Segments within the buffer will receive 1 point, while all other segments will receive 0 points.
Segments may receive more than 1 point if they are within 1 mile of multiple schools
Limitations This will prioritize all schools equally; smaller schools that may have less walking and biking demand will receive the same priority as schools with more students.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
808
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Quality of Service: Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
Variable Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
Factor Quality of Service
Description Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) is a measure originally developed at the Mineta Transportation Institute to estimate the level of stress a bicyclist may feel while riding along a particular roadway. In general, higher vehicle speeds, higher vehicle volumes, and lower levels of separation between bicyclists and vehicles lead to higher levels of traffic stress. In Task 3 of this Plan production, the team performed an on-street LTS analysis for the City and a corresponding path LTS evaluation to provide scores for off-street segments.
Data Needs Task 3 LTS analysis results
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
This criterion only applies to the bicycling mode.
Proposed
Methodology
Low stress facilities (LTS 1 and 2) will receive 0 points, and high stress facilities (LTS 3 and 4) will receive 1 point.
Limitations Level of traffic stress has been emerging as an analysis approach and metric that is widely applicable, intuitive, and easy to understand. It can also help inform the type of design that will provide “low-stress” facilities that are attractive to all users.
However, some risk factors that may affect bicyclist comfort are not included in the Level of Traffic Stress assessment (e.g., driveway density and presence of signals).
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
809
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Quality of Service: Sidewalk Gaps
Variable Sidewalk Gaps
Factor Quality of Service
Description Existing sidewalk gaps can create barriers to walking. If people walking do not know to expect a sidewalk gap, they may choose to walk that route and need to cross to avoid the sidewalk gap or may choose to walk in the road. Both of these options increase their exposure to motor vehicles. Others may plan their trip to avoid the sidewalk gap, which can add time and distance to the trip and in some circumstances may encourage the individual to take a different mode or not take the trip.
Identifying and prioritizing locations where there are sidewalk gaps can lead to improvements in these locations, which can ultimately increase the safety and comfort for pedestrians.
Data Needs Geolocated sidewalk gap data
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
This criterion only applies to the pedestrian mode.
Proposed
Methodology
Locations with no sidewalk gap will receive 0 points, while locations with a sidewalk gap will receive 1 point.
Limitations Pedestrian safety and comfort can be affected by other characteristics not captured in this variable, like presence of a barrier, type of barrier, presence of street trees, speeds, number of lanes, and sidewalk width.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
810
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Major Barriers: Freeway Crossings
Variable Freeway Crossings
Factor Major Barriers
Description Freeway ramps and crossings can create barriers for people biking and walking.
Sometimes the crossing infrastructure over or under freeways is uncomfortable to bike and walk on, and intersections with freeway ramps may include high motor vehicle design speeds and volumes. This criterion will prioritize improving safety and quality of service for ramp terminal intersection and freeway crossings.
Data Needs Locations of ramp terminals
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for the bicycle and pedestrian analysis, and because the data used will not vary by mode, the results of this criterion will be the same for each mode.
Proposed
Methodology
Segments within 250 feet of a ramp terminal will receive a score of 1 and all other segments will receive a score of 0.
Limitations This evaluation may not include all major barriers to biking and walking in the City, which may also include short segments of bridge, guardrail, or poor roadway or sidewalk conditions.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
811
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project #: 24392 February 1, 2020 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Consistency with Past Planning: Previously Identified Projects Variable Previously Identified Projects
Factor Consistency with Past Planning
Description This criterion will prioritize locations identified as needing improvements through the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The Plan included a ranking of priority projects. Those are as follows:
- Tier Zero: Designed and planned, under-construction, scheduled, - Tier One: Highest priority projects for grant funding with initial feasibility analysis and concept development in the Plan update
- Tier Two: High priority projects for grant funding that may require additional feasibility analysis
- Tier Three: All other projects
Those project tiers were based on feasibility of project delivery rather than project need.
Data Needs Spatial priority project data from the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Same method
for pedestrian
and bicycle?
The same methodology will be used for pedestrian and bicycle modes. Many projects include both bicycle and pedestrian improvements.
Proposed
Methodology
Locations where there is a project and it has not yet been implemented willreceive 1 point, while all other segments receive 0 points.
Limitations Because the 2014 Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan did not consider project need in the tiering process, all projects will be scored the same.
Recommended
Scaling
Proportionate (binary)
812
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
NETWORK
RECOMMENDATIONS:
PROJECT LIST AND
COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX C
813
Project ID Tier
2014 Plan Project
Number Project Description Project Location From To Miles Cost- High Cost - Low Bicycle Project Type Segment Projects
S-1 Tier I Study opportunities and create designs for traffic calming, striping, and signs to create Class III bikeways Various locations for Class III
facilities/neighborhood bikeways: Tamarack
Drive, Davona Drive, St. Patrick Way, Lucania
Street, Brighton Drive, Grafton Street, Antone
Way, South Bridgepointe Lane, and Brannigan
Street 5.139639 5.14 25,000 $ 25,000 $ Class III
S-2 Tier I
Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities; if possible, provide wide buffer (greater than 3') for potential to add vertical separation to convert to Class IV in the future; as a future project phase, provide a separated facility (Class I or Class IV) Gleason Drive Arnold Road Brannigan Street 1.357487 1.36 239,000 $ 239,000 $ Class IIB S-3 Tier I
Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities; if possible, provide wide buffer (greater than 3') for potential to add vertical separation to convert to Class IV in the future; as a future project phase, provide a separated facility (Class I or Class IV) Hacienda Drive Southern
City Limits Gleason Drive 0.6 0.60 106,000 $ 106,000 $ Class IIB S-4 Tier I
Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities; if possible, provide wide buffer (greater than 3') for potential to add vertical separation to convert to Class IV in the future; as a future project phase, provide a separated facility (Class I or Class IV) Dublin Boulevard Scarlett
Drive Tassajara Road 1.3 1.30 229,000 $ 229,000 $ Class IIB S-5 Tier I
Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities; if possible, provide wide buffer (greater than 3') for potential to add vertical separation to convert to Class IV in the future and evaluate opportunities to lower speed limit; if speeds are not lowered, as a future phase provide a separated facility (Class I or Class IV) Arnold Road
Dublin
Boulevard Altamirano Ave 0.3 0.30 53,000 $ 53,000 $ Class IIB S-6 Tier I Convert to a Class IIB bikeway through restriping Grafton Street Kohnen Way Antone Way 0.235965 0.24 42,000 $ 42,000 $ Class IIB S-7 Tier I Convert to a Class IIB bikeway by restriping travel lanes on Tassajara, Dougherty, and Hacienda at the I-580 overcrossings Tassajara Road, Dougherty Road, and Hacienda
Drive
Southern
City Limits Dublin Boulveard 0.84877 0.85 150,000 $ 150,000 $ Class IIB S-8 Tier I
Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities; if possible, provide wide buffer (greater than 3') for potential to add vertical separation to convert to Class IV in the future; as a future project phase, provide a separated facility (Class I or Class IV) Tassajara Road North Dublin
Ranch Drive Rutherford Drive 0.521904 0.52 2,784,000 $ 138,000 $ Class IIB S-9 Tier I
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Village Parkway Amador
Valley
Boulevard
Northern City
Limits 0.857586 0.86 4,803,000 $ 945,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-10 Tier II Implement the traffic calming, striping, and signs plans and designs created in project S-1 to create Class III bikeways Various locations for Class III
facilities/neighborhood bikeways: Tamarack
Drive, Davona Drive, St. Patrick Way, Lucania
Street, Brighton Drive, Antone Way, South
Bridgepointe Lane, and Brannigan Street 0 0 5.139639 5.14 691,000 $ 691,000 $ Class III S-11 Tier II Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities and evaluate opportunities to lower speed limit or provide a Class IV or Class I facility Village Parkway Dublin
Boulevard
Amador Valley
Boulevard 0.342414 0.34 1,826,000 $ 91,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-12 Tier II Evaluate opportunities to reduce speed limit along this corridor Tassajara Road Palisades
Drive
North Dublin
Ranch Drive 0.719841 0.72 18,000 $ 18,000 $ Reduced speed S-13 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dougherty Road Dublin
Boulevard
Southern city
limits 0 0.25 1,393,000 $ 274,000 $ Class IV/Class I
S-14 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Amador Valley Boulevard Stagecoach
Road Dougherty Road 0.3 0.30 1,680,000 $ 331,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-15 Tier II
Upgrade pedestrian facility to improve comfort, especially across the I-580 overcrossing, conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate for this location, and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment. This project is anticipated to be implemented after the lower cost solution in S-7. Tassajara Road Gleason
Drive
Southern City
Limits
but not
the
bridge
upgrades 0.458282 0.46 2,567,000 $ 505,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-16 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dublin Boulevard Inspiration
Drive San Ramon Road 1.1 1.10 6,161,000 $ 1,212,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-17 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dublin Boulevard Inspiration
Drive Western extent 1.5 1.50 8,401,000 $ 1,653,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-18 Tier II
Upgrade pedestrian facility to improve comfort, especially across the I-580 overcrossing, conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate for this location, and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment. Fallon Road Gleason
Drive
Southern city
limits
but not
the
bridge
upgrades 1.2 1.20 6,721,000 $ 1,322,000 $ Class IV/Class I 814
S-19 Tier II
Make improvements to adjacent sidepaths to provide two-way bicycle and pedestrian connectivity by evaluating needs for and implementing wayfinding, signing, and striping improvements, intersection improvements, and crossings, as needed. Fallon Road Gleason
Drive Tassajara Road 0 1.58 1,583,000 $ 238,000 $ Class IB S-20 Tier II Add buffered bike lanes along the Dublin Boulevard Extension Dublin Boulevard Tassajara
Road Eastern city limits 0 0.98 5,334,000 $ 259,000 $ Class IIB S-21 Tier II Work with Contra Costa County to design and implement Class IIB facilities Tassajara Road Palidsades
Drive
Northern City
Limits 1584 1.584992 0.30 1,640,000 $ 80,000 $ Class IIB S-22 Tier II 1-2A/1-2B
As recommended in the 2014 plan, upgrade to separated Class I facilities providing sufficient space to reduce conflicts between people walking and biking; evaluate opportunities to improve walkability by reducing obstructions; enhance median and lighting along Dublin Boulevard under I-680; improve sidewalk connection across commercial driveway and at bus stop (east of Regional Street); add pedestrianscale lighting under I-680 Overpass. Install barrier in median underneath overcrossing to prohibit pedestrian crossings. Dublin BoulevardSan Ramon Road Dougherty Road 1.5 1.5 $ 4,956,000 4,956,000 $ Class IB S-23 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dublin Boulevard Dougherty
Road Scarlett Drive 0.3 0.45 1,974,000 $ 497,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-24 Tier II
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dublin Boulevard Tassajara
Road Fallon Road 1.20 6,887,457 $ 1,322,083 $ Class IV/Class I S-25 Tier II Upgrade to a Class IIB Bicycle lane and evaluate opportunities to lower the speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Central Parkway Tassajara
Road Fallon Road 1.126547 1.13 5,135,000 $ 227,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-26 Tier III Study opportunities, create designs, and implement traffic calming and signs to create Class III Bikeways along the identified roadways Various locations: N Dublin Ranch Drive, S
Dublin Ranch Drive, Hansen Drive, Starward
Drive, San Sabana Road, Southwick Drive,
Hibernia Drive, Donohue Drive, Keegan Street,
Peppertree Road, Madden Way, Kohnen Way,
York Drive, Maple Drive, Inspiration Drive, and
Vomac Road 0 0 7.302099 7.30 982,000 $ 982,000 $ Class III S-27 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Lockhart Street Central
Parkway Dublin Boulevard 0.5 0.30 1,507,000 $ 66,000 $ Class IIA S-28 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists John Monego Court Dublin
Boulevard Southern extent 0.3 0.30 1,507,000 $ 66,000 $ Class IIA S-29 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Sierra Lane Sierra Court Dougherty Road 0.367522 0.37 1,846,000 $ 81,000 $ Class IIA S-30 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists York Drive Amador
Valley
Boulevard Poplar Way 0.4 0.40 2,009,000 $ 88,000 $ Class IIA S-31 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Hibernia Drive Dublin
Boulevard
Summer Glen
Drive 0.4 0.40 2,009,000 $ 88,000 $ Class IIA
S-32 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Shannon Avenue Vomac Road Peppertree Road 0.4 0.40 2,009,000 $ 88,000 $ Class IIA S-33 Tier III Add a Class IIA Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Glynnis Rose Drive Central
Parkway Dublin Boulevard 0.3 0.30 1,507,000 $ 66,000 $ Class IIA S-34 Tier III Extend bike lanes and sidepaths along Central Parkway to Croak Road Central Parkway 500' west of
Croak Road Croak Road 0.087884 0.09 697,000 $ 697,000 $ Class IIA S-35 Tier III
If Croak Road is improved south of S Terracina Drive, add low stress bicycle facilities based on anticipated speeds, volumes, and FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide recommendations Croak Road/Volterra Drive Volterra
Court Dublin Boulevard 1 1.10 2,860,000 $ 2,860,000 $ Class IIA S-36 Tier III Restripe to add buffer to the Class II facilities and evaluate opportunities to lower speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Central Parkway Iron Horse
Parkway Tassajara Road 1.545072 1.40 223,000 $ 223,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-37 Tier III Upgrade to a Class IIB Bicycle lane and evaluate opportunities to lower the speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Gleason Drive Fallon Road Brannigan Road 0.742513 0.74 3,384,000 $ 150,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-38 Tier III Upgrade to a Class IIB Bicycle lane and evaluate opportunities to lower the speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Amador Plaza Road Southern
Extent
Amador Valley
Boulevard 0.6 0.60 2,720,000 $ 106,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-39 Tier III Upgrade to a Class IIB Bicycle lane and evaluate opportunities to lower the speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Silvergate Drive San Ramon
Road Peppertree Road 0.2 0.20 907,000 $ 35,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-40 Tier III
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Arnold Road Dublin
Boulevard
Southern city
limits 0 0.30 1,600,000 $ 80,000 $ Class IIB; reduced speed S-41 Tier III Improve wayfinding and signage for parallel path on east side; restripe to upgrade Class IIA facilities to Class IIB facilities Dougherty Road Scarlett
Drive
Northern City
Limits
improve
wayfindi
ng 1.4 1.40 284,000 $ 284,000 $ Class IIB
S-42 Tier III
Add a Class IIB bike lane where no bike lane currently exists or improve adjacent sidepaths to provide two-way bicycle and pedestrian connectivity by evaluating needs for and implementing wayfinding, signing, and striping improvements, intersection improvements, and crossings, as needed. Lockhart Street
Central
Parkway Gleason Drive 0.5 0.50 499,000 $ 75,000 $ Class IIB S-43 Tier III Add a Class IIB Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Stagecoach Road Amador
Valley
Boulevard
Northern City
Limits
lower
speed
limit--
need a
study? 0.9 0.90 4,800,000 $ 239,000 $ Class IIB
S-44 Tier III Add a Class IIB Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Sierra Ct Dublin
Boulevard Northern extent 0.7 0.70 3,734,000 $ 186,000 $ Class IIB S-45 Tier III Upgrade from Class IIA to Class IIB Bicycle Lane Amador Valley Boulevard Village
Parkway Stagecoach Road 0.8 0.80 3,626,000 $ 141,000 $ Class IIB 815
S-46 Tier III Restripe to a Class IIB Bicycle Lane where no bike lane currently exists Bent Tree Drive Fallon Road East Sugar Hill
Terrace 0.4 0.40 106,000 $ 106,000 $ Class IIB
S-47 Tier III As a follow up to S-3, evaluate opportunities to lower the speed limit or provide Class IV or Class I facility Hacienda Drive Gleason
Road Dublin Boulevard 0 0.60 2,735,000 $ 121,000 $ Reduced speed S-48 Tier III
Conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment Dougherty Road Dublin
Boulevard Scarlett Drive 0.45123 0.45123 $ 497,000 1,974,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-49 Tier III
Upgrade pedestrian facility to improve comfort, especially across the I-580 overcrossing, conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location, and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment. This project is anticipated to be implemented after the lower cost solution in S-7. Hacienda Drive Dublin
Boulevard
Southern city
limits
not
bridge 0 0.30 1,680,000 $ 331,000 $ Class IV/Class I
S-50 Tier III
Upgrade pedestrian facility to improve comfort, especially across the I-580 overcrossing, and conduct a complete streets study to determine whether Class I or Class IV facilities are most appropriate and feasible for this location and implement the chosen separated bicycle treatment San Ramon Road
Dublin
Boulevard
Southern city
limits
not
bridge 0.251646 0.30 1,680,000 $ 331,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-51 Tier III
Make improvements to adjacent sidepaths to provide two-way bicycle and pedestrian connectivity by evaluating needs for and implementing wayfinding, signing, and striping improvements, intersection improvements, and crossings, as needed. Dublin Boulevard Scarlett
Drive Tassajara Road 1.77 1.77 1,768,000 $ 266,000 $ Class IB S-52 Tier III Upgrade from Class IIB to Class IV Bicycle Lane Clark Ave/Village Parkway Dublin
Boulevard Dublin Boulevard 0.3 0.50 2,227,000 $ 320,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-53 Tier III
Add Class I facilities on both sides of the road on Martinelli Way and support the Class I facilities by adding signage, wayfinding, and crossing improvements at the intersections; connect to the BART Station by providing continuous Class I or Class IIA facilities along Iron Horse Parkway. Martinelli Way and Iron Horse Parkway
BART Station
on Iron
Horse
Parkway Hacienda Drive 0.683253 1.50 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000 $ Class IV/Class I S-54 Tier III Add bike lanes with the implementation of the Golden Gate extension project Golden Gate Drive Dublin
Boulevard
Amador Valley
Boulevard 0.350907 0.350907 $ 77,000 1,806,000 $ Class IIA Trail Projects
T-1 Tier I Implement Phase I and II of the Iron Horse Nature Park Master Plan to create park space and trail access and connectivity improvements Iron Horse Regional Trail $ 11,560,000 $ 11,560,000.00 Trail T-2 Tier II Add trail connection from Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road Downtown Dublin Regional
Street
Amador Plaza
Road 0.35 764,767 $ 764,767.34 $ Trail
T-3 Tier II With development, add Class I connection between Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway, just east of Tassajara Road East of Tassajara approximately 500 ft Dublin
Boulevard Central Parkway 0.284090909 620,753 $ 620,752.71 $ Trail T-4 Tier III Add trail connection along Dublin Creek along the Zone 7 channel, to connect at San Ramon Road Dublin Creek Trail Amador
Plaza Road San Ramon Road 0.706325758 1,543,357 $ 1,543,356.78 $ Trail T-5 Tier III Create connection to Shannon Community Center from the San Ramon Bike Path San Ramon Bike Path Shannon
Community
Center 0 0.01 21,850 $ 21,319.04 $ Trail
T-6 Tier III Add Class I facility along east side of Village to connect to the Alamo Canal Trail Alamo Canal Trail Dublin High
School and
Village
Parkway
Alamo Canal Trail
between Cedar
Lane and
Ebensburg Lane 1.06 2,316,153 $ 2,259,818.03 $ Trail
T-7 Tier III
As recommended in the 2014 plan, widen existing sidewalk and add signing and striping treatments to create a shared use path on the south side of Dublin Boulevard. Dublin Boulevard
Amador
Plaza Road Village Parkway 0.22 586,257 $ 586,256.72 $ Trail T-8 Tier III
Add a bicycle and pedestrian bridge over the canal to create Class I connection between Village Parkway/Clark Avenue at Alamo Canal Trail at the Dublin Public Safety Complex Site Alamo Canal Trail/Civic Plaza Village
Parkway/Cla
rk Avenue Alamo Canal Trail 0.1 6,318,000 $ 6,318,000.00 $ Trail T-9 Tier III Create Class I connection along the future Dublin Boulevard Extension corridor from Fallon Road to Collier Canyon Parkway (Livermore) Dublin Boulevard Extension Fallon Road Collier Canyon
Park (Livermore) 0.98 6,475,500 $ 6,475,500.00 $ Trail
T-10 Tier III Through development, add Class I facility on the west side of Brannigan St. from Central Parkway to Gleason Boulevard Brannigan Street Central
Parkway
Gleason
Boulevard 0.19 506,313 $ 506,312.62 $ Trail
T-11 Tier III
Add Class I connection and street crossing enhancements on the north side of Central Parkway from Emerald Glen Park/Tassajara Road to Brannigan Street Central Parkway
Emerald
Glen
Park/Tassaja
ra Road Brannigan Street 0.18 606,187 $ 606,187.23 $ Trail T-12 Tier III Add Class I connection along the south side of the school grounds and Dublin Swin Center from Iron Horse Trail to Village Parkway Dublin High School Iron Horse
Trail Village Parkway 0.59 1,289,179 $ 1,257,823.24 $ Trail T-13 Tier III
Study options for gap closure to provide a bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing and shared use path from Tassajara Creek at Dublin Boulevard south over I-580 into Pleasanton Tassajara Creek
Dublin
Boulevard Pleasanton 0.27 250,000 $ 250,000.00 $ Trail
T-14 Tier III
Add Class I connection along the southern edge of Nielson Elementary to connect Amarillo Road with the existing path along Mape Memorial Park to san Ramon Road Nielson Elementary School
Amarillo
Road
Mape Memorial
Park Path 0.17 371,458 $ 362,423.65 $ Trail
T-15 Tier III Add Class I connection along Altamirano Street between the Dublin BART station and Martinelli Way Altamirano Street Dublin BART
station Martinelli Way 0.71 1,892,010 $ 1,892,010.33 $ Trail T-16 Tier III Add Class I connections along Croak Road from Dublin Boulevard to Positano Parkway Croak Road Dublin
Boulevard Positano Parkway 0.9 2,398,323 $ 2,398,322.96 $ Trail 816
T-17 Tier III Add or improve trails along Positano Parkway to connect to the trail on Croak Road Positano Parkway Croak Road La Strada Drive 0.76 2,025,250 $ 2,025,250.50 $ Trail T-18 Tier III Add Class I connection between the existing Tassajara Creek trailhead on Tassajara Road and trails in the Wallis Ranch development Tassajara Creek Trail Tassajara
Road
Trailhead
Wallis Ranch
development
trails 0.46 1,005,123 $ 980,675.75 $ Trail
Freeway
Crossing
Projects
FC-1 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings San Ramon Road at southbound I-580
westbound ramp entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing FC-2 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings San Ramon Road at northbound I-580
westbound ramp entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing FC-3 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings San Ramon Road at I-580 westbound ramp
terminal $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-4 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings St. Patrick Way at I-580 ramp terminal and
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-5 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Dougherty Road at I-580 westbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-6 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Dougherty Road at I-580 westbound ramp
terminal $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-7 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Dougherty Road at I-580 eastbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-8 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Hacienda Drive at I-580 westbound ramp
terminal $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-9 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Hacienda Drive at I-580 eastbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-10 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Hacienda Drive at I-580 westbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-11 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Tassajara Road at I-580 westbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-12 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Tassajara Road at I-580 westbound ramp
terminal $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-13 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Tassajara Road at I-580 eastbound ramp
entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing
FC-14 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Fallon Road at I-580 westbound ramp terminal
and entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing FC-15 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Fallon Road at I-580 eastbound ramp entrance $ 1,115,000.00 1,115,000 $ Freeway Crossing FC-16 Tier III Redesign interchange ramp terminal to provide safe crossings Village Parkway at I-680 NB ramp entrance $ 1,115,000 $ 1,115,000.00 Freeway Crossing Crossing
Projects
C-1 Tier I Provide mid-block crossing (RRFB or other actuated treatment) Regional Street between Dublin Boulevard and
Amador Valley Boulevard $ 320,000.00 320,000 $ Crossing C-2 Tier I
Existing Iron Horse
Trail Crossing project Provide pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing to connect to Don Biddle Community Park Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Trail $ 6,318,000.00 6,318,000 $ Crossing C-3 Tier II Add connection from Sierra Court to the Alamo Canal/Iron Horse Trail network Sierra Court cul-de-sac $ 2,132,000 $ 2,132,000.00 Trail C-4 Tier III
Study the feasibility of improving the crossing of Tassajara Creek Trail at Dublin Boulevard by providing better connections to the existing crossing at John Monego Court. Provide wayfinding and signs to direct people biking and walking between the trail and the intersection. Tassajara Creek Trail and Dublin Boulevard Impleme
nt signal
timing, $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Crossing
C-5 Tier III
Improve connections to nearby crossings or add crossing at Tassajara Road and Tassajara Creek Trail (south of Rutherford Drive) to provide access to the trailhead; improve general access to and connectivity from the trail to Tassajara Road and local destinations Tassajara Creek Trail and Tassajara Road $ 627,000.00 627,000 $ Crossing $ - $ -
Intersection
Projects $ - - $
I-1 Tier I Provide crossing improvements (RRFB or other actuated treatment) to provide more visibility of people walking/biking, especially to school Central Parkway/Aspen Street $ 320,000.00 320,000 $ Intersection I-2 Tier I Provide crossing improvements (RRFB or other actuated treatment) to provide more visibility of people walking/biking, especially to school Grafton Street/Antone Way $ 320,000.00 320,000 $ Intersection I-3 Tier I Provide crossing improvements (RRFB or other actuated treatment) to provide more visibility of people walking/biking, especially to school Amador Valley Boulevard/Burton Street $ 320,000.00 320,000 $ Intersection I-4 Tier II 2-2H
As recommended in the 2014 plan, improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Remove slip lanes; reduce curb radii on all corners; install curb extensions on the SE and SW corners; install directional curb ramps. Village Parkway/Amador Valley Boulevard $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-5 Tier II
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Village Parkway/Tamarack Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-6 Tier II
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Village Parkway/Brighton Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection 817
I-7 Tier II
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Hibernia Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-8 Tier II
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Arnold Road $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-9 Tier II
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Hacienda Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-10 Tier II 1-2F
As recommended in the 2014 plan, improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Reduce width of SB right-turn lane and reduce turning radii; remove NB right-turn slip lane and reduce curb radii; reduce curb radii on NE and SE corners; straighten crosswalks. Dublin Boulevard/Village Parkway $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-11 Tier III Provide higher visibility crossing treatments, especially to support access to the school Grafton Street/Madden Way/Kohnen Way $ 320,000 $ 627,000.00 Intersection I-12 Tier III Provide higher visibility crossing treatments, especially to support access to the school Antone Way/Bridgepointe Lane $ 320,000 $ 4,000.00 Intersection I-13 Tier III Provide higher visibility crossing treatments, especially to support access to the school S Dublin Ranch Drive/Woodshire Lane $ 320,000 $ 4,000.00 Intersection I-14 Tier III
Add Class I signage, striping, and signal changes to create visibility of people walking and biking across the existing Tassajara Road and Palisades Drive signalized crossing Tassajara Road and Palisades Drive $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection I-15 Tier III
Provide Class I facilities on the west side of Silvergate Drive and make intersection changes at Hansen Drive and Bay Laurel Street to provide comfortable connectivity to the existing stop controlled intersection at Hansen Drive Martin Canyon Creek Trail at Silvergate Drive $ 2,600,000.00 2,600,000 $ Intersection I-16 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Gleason Drive/Grafton Street $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-17 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Gleason Drive/Brannigan street $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-18 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Central Parkway/Brannigan street $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-19 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Brannigan street $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-20 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Central Parkway/Hibernia Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-21 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Central Parkway/Hacienda Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-22 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Regional Street $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-23 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Tassajara Road/Gleason Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-24 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Fallon Road /Central Parkway $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-25 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Dublin Boulevard/Golden Gate Drive $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-26 Tier III
Improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Fallon Road /Dublin Boulevard $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-27 Tier III 1-2E
As recommended in the 2014 plan, reduce curb radii on all corners; install directional curb ramps at all corners Subject to further analysis, remove NB overlap phase; install pedestrian countdown signals and audible warning signs Stripe crosswalk on south leg subject to further analysis Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road $ 123,000.00 972,000 $ Intersection I-28 Tier III 2-2G/2-2E/2-2F
As recommended in the 2014 plan, consider adding leading pedestrian intervals for all approaches; Consider removing slip lanes on NW and NE corners and add curb extensions on SW, NW, and NE corners pending additional engineering analysis; Consider striping crosswalk on south leg pending additional engineering analysis San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard $ 123,000.00 548,000 $ Intersection I-29 Tier III 2-2D
As recommended in the 2014 plan, consider modifying signal to include leading pedestrian interval on EB and WB approaches; Consider protected left-turn phasing for NB and SB traffic. Regional Street/Amador Valley Boulevard $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection I-30 Tier III 1-1E
As recommended in the 2014 plan, mark crosswalk on east leg of intersection; Widen median and add median tips as feasible to provide 6' pedestrian refuge; Reduce curb radii Amador Valley Boulevard/Amador Plaza $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection I-31 Tier III 1-2C
As recommended in the 2014 plan, improve safety for people walking and biking by implementing strategies like protected intersection treatments, signing, bike lane skip striping through the intersection, bike boxes, leading pedestrian intervals, or by separating bicyclists and pedestrians from turning movements. Reduce curb radii on all corners and install directional curb ramps. Dublin Boulevard/Amador Plaza Road $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection I-32 Tier III 2-1A/2-1B
As recommended in the 2014 plan, install wayfinding signage to West Dublin BART; install bulb-outs at all corners; construct directional curb ramps St. Patrick Way/Golden Gate Drive $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection I-33 Tier III 2-2B
As recommended in the 2014 plan, reduce curb radii on all corners; widen medians and add median tips; install directional curb ramps on all corners Amador Valley Boulevard/Donohue Drive $ 123,000.00 123,000 $ Intersection 818
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
ENGINEERING AND
DESIGN GUIDE
APPENDIX D
819
DUBLIN BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN PLAN:
ENGINEERING AND
DESIGN GUIDE
December 2022
Draft
820
2 City of Dublin Draft
INTRODUCTION
This guide was developed as a reference document
for best practices in planning and designing bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. It first provides resources
relevant to planning and designing pedestrian and
bicycle facilities, including a list of specific design topics and guidance document recommendations to
consult. It then provides specific planning and design
recommendations for several key topics relevant to
developing Dublin’s biking and walking infrastructure.
In applying this design guidance, the responsible
engineer should use professional judgment and
document design decisions. Decisions should be made
based on location specific context and the obligation to protect the life, health, and property of the public.
RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
DESIGN TOPICS AND RELEVANT
GUIDANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE . . . . . . . . . 13
SIDEWALK WIDTH
RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 BIKEWAY SELECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS . . . . . 26
CROSSING SELECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
BICYCLE FACILITIES THROUGH
INTERSECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 821
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: Supplemental Design Guidance 3 Draft
KEY RESOURCES
• AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, Fourth Edition (2012) – likely to be replaced by the Fifth Edition in 2022 • NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide, Second Edition (2014) • NACTO Urban Street Design Guide (2013)
• FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at
Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (2018)
• CalTrans Highway Design Manual (2018)
• FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide (2015) • FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2009) • California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Revision 6 (2021)
SUPPLEMENTAL
RESOURCES
• TCRP Report 112/NCHRP Report 562: Improving
Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings.
Washington D.C.: TCRP and NCHRP, 2006.
• Routine Accommodations of Pedestrians and Bicyclists in the Bay Area, Metropolitan Transportation Commission,
Available: https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/A-08_ RES-3765_complete_streets.pdf 2006.
• Complete Streets Checklist Guidance Resolution 4493, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Available: https://mtc.
ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2022-05/MTCAdministrative-Guidance-CS-Checklist.pdf (2022)
RESOURCES
The following resources should be used as references for best practices in planning and design for pedestrian facilities. 822
2 DESIGN TOPICS AND
RELEVANT GUIDANCE
823
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: Supplemental Design Guidance 5 Draft
DESIGN TOPIC DESIGN RESOURCE RELEVANT PAGES/LOCATION
Sidewalks and
Sidewalk Zones
NACTO Urban Street Design Guide (2013) https://
nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/
Guide for the Planning Design and Operation
of Pedestrian Facilities (2004)
https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/
docs/NCHRP20-07(263)_FR.pdf
Pages 37– 44; https://nacto.org/publication/urbanstreet-design-guide/street-design-elements/sidewalks/ Chapter 3.2; Pages 54 - 70
Pedestrian
Wayfinding
Seamless Seattle Pedestrian Wayfinding Strategy (2019)
Global Street Design Guide (2016)
Global Street Design Guide | Global
Designing Cities Initiative
Wayfinding Strategy_July2019_
SDOT Edit.pdf (seattle.gov)
6.3.9; Page 91;
https://globaldesigningcities.org/wp-content/uploads/
guides/global-street-design-guide-lowres.pdf
Street Furniture Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-way (2013)
https://www.access-board.gov/
prowag/preamble-prowag/