Agenda packet — Eastvale City Council, January 11, 2023 (part 2 of 3)

181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
Credit Agreement Summary - Limonite between Archibald and Hellman Homestead (CON) Ranch (CON) Campus (ROW) Total
TUMF Obligation 1,790,981.00 $ 1,465,086.00 $ 26,434.00 $ 3,282,501.00 $ TUMF Unit Cost Assumptions 2,667,910.00 $ 2,050,670.00 $ 114,343.00 $ 4,832,923.00 $ Reimbursement 876,929.00 $ 585,584.00 $ 87,909.00 $ 1,550,422.00 $ 2022 Northwest Zone 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Current TIP PAED ENG CON ROW
Bridge and Roadway Segment
TUMF funding available 9,328,000.00 $ 254,000.00 $ 636,000.00 $ 8,438,000.00 $ - $ Limonite Ave Extension
(Hellman to Archibald) 650,000.00 $ 196,000.00 $ 454,000.00 $ - $ - $ Total 9,978,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 1,090,000.00 $ 8,438,000.00 $ -$ Available TUMF funding after credit agreements

TOTAL PAED ENG CON ROW
Available TUMF after credit
agreements (Total TIP - Total
Unit Cost Assumption from
Credit Agreement)
5,145,077.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 1,090,000.00 $ 3,719,420.00 $ (114,343.00) $ Reimbursement Agreement in
place 1,540,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 1,090,000.00 $ Amendment to RA 5,145,077.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 4,195,077.00 $ 204

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.9
January 11, 2023
Second Reading of an Ordinance Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve the second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending
Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets, and ﬁnd that the adop%on of said Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:

- Segment 14: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 to establish the speed limit for a new segment.
- Segment 16: Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable.

Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
205
shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the ac%ons of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of iden%fying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Sec%on 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traﬃc on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

Since the City Council approved the Engineering and Traﬃc Survey on July 24, 2013, four subsequent amendments were approved. The Engineering Division determined that it is necessary to study thirty-seven (37) street segments. In accordance with State law, the Engineering and Traﬃc Survey involves three major elements of data collec%on and analysis: (1) spot speed radar survey; (2) collision rate analysis; and (3) roadway segment ﬁeld review to iden%fy any roadway characteris%cs not readily apparent to motorists. The recommended speed limits are based on these three elements. The study and recommended speed limits have also been reviewed and approved by the Riverside Sherriff's Office who provides contract safety services to Eastvale.

Two street segments within the City’s arterial and collector street network were surveyed. The California Vehicle Code requires speed limits to be set near the 85 th
percen%le speed for arterial and
collector streets. Based on the Engineering and Traﬃc Survey results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these two (2) segments is shown below:

Segment No.

Location
Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit (mph)
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Ave and I-
15 Fwy
None
50 16
Citrus St
Harrison Ave and
Scholar Way
45 45*
* Staﬀ ini%ally recommended a speed limit of 40 mph for Segment 16, but per Council direc%on at the ﬁrst reading of the ordinance on December 14, 2022, this recommenda%on has been increased to 45 mph.

Citrus Street between Harrison and Sumner previously had a wide travel lane and a con%nuous issue with speeding. In early 2022, an addi%onal travel lane was added on both sides (total 4 lanes) of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Sumner Ave. In addi%on, a bike lane was added on both sides of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Scholar Ave as part of the recent Annual Overlay Project. The CA MUTCD requires sec%ons of the same street with diﬀerent characteris%cs, including number of lanes, adjacent land use, etc. to be studied separately. The traﬃc data collected for Citrus Street in 2021 represented the en%re segment: from Harrison Avenue to Hamner Avenue. It will s%ll represent the remaining section from Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue.

Cantu-Galleano Road is a short segment that connects City of Ontario and City of Jurupa Valley. It 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
206
was never surveyed to establish the speed limit.

The current speed limits in the adjacent ci%es are
55 mph in Ontario and 45 mph in Jurupa Valley.

In order for the courts to uphold speeding %ckets issued by law enforcement, each %cket must be able to withstand the scru%ny of the courts. This Engineering and Traﬃc Survey contains documents with suﬃcient informa%on in compliance with State law to jus%fy the posted speed limit. Once the ordinance is adopted, the corresponding changes to the posted speed limits on the aﬀected streets will be modified.

Environmental
Adop%on of the proposed ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15301 (Exis%ng Facili%es), which exempts from CEQA review projects involving the opera%on of exis%ng public facili%es involving negligible or no expansion of the use. This exemp%on covers the opera%on of exis%ng streets and highways, including changes to speed limits.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addi%onal speed limit signs need to be installed at various loca%ons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is es%mated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.

On December 14, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing for the speed survey amendment and voted to approve the proposed ordinance with one change to the recommended speed limit on Citrus Avenue: increase the limit form from 40 miles per hour to 45 miles per hour.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale 2022 Speed Zone Survey Amendment Final Draft

Attachment 2 - Ordinance

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
207

2022
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 2023-XX
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 18-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 2015-14
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10

Approved By:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650

Date
* Contract services provided by Interwest Consulting Group 208

209

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 11

4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

4.1 Speed Limit Signing 13

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14

5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance 14

APPENDIX

APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Sheets
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
210

211
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for two (2) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe an d reasonable, therefore, speed limit s are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to docum ent that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied and th at other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria. California Asse mbly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC S ection 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, but they do not take effect until the next revision of the CA MUTCD is approved.

On July 10, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:

14. Cantu-Galleano between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 (new segment)

16. Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 212
Introduction
2 The segments below were studied for the following reasons:

1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 14

2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable:
 Citrus Street – Segment 161
This survey will either verify, increase, or decrea se the existing speed limits for the two (2) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.

At two (2) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD 2014 (rev 6).

Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc.

Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E. 1 In 2022, a City project restriped the section of Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes (to match Sumner Avenue to Scholar Way) with bike lanes. Citrus Street between Sumner Ave and Scholar Way was also restriped, to add bike lanes. The result was consistent stripi ng between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The restriping changed the character of the roadway between Harrison Aven ue and Scholar Way, requiring a resurvey for continued enforcement. Citrus Street previously varied along its length from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. With the new striping, a mile-long section of the street now has consistent striping, which is significantly diff erent from the striping between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. The City decided to split Citrus Street into two segments, between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way and between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. New speed survey data and traffic count data were collected for the modified segment between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The traffic data collected in the 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey are still applicable to the segment between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue since there have not been any striping changes to that segment. The traffic collision data for Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue, however, has been modified to reflect the shorter segment, with no change in the findings.
213
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, th e normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 a nd as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 6. The thr ee elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:
 Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed su rveys, performed by a certifie d radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for two (2) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.

214
Study Methodology
4 Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the two (2) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the Statew ide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022 (three years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased co nsideration of vulnerable pedest rian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements and two other factor s described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow th e speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditi ons are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no furt her reduction can be applied.

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Collision Data on California State Highways (roads miles, travel, collisions) published by Caltrans every two years. The latest edition, 2019, was used for this 2022 analysis.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years 215
Study Methodology
5 Where: Number of mid-block collis ions based on 3 years (August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022), 24- hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43 modified certain sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which also pertain to certain sections of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Some of the modified sections of the CVC became effective on January 1, 2022, whereas other changes related to the CA MUTC D do not go into effect until the CA MUTCD is updated. Neither of the two study segments were affected by AB 43. Details of the changes related to AB 43 are provided in Appendix A.
216
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey

Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Su rvey Summary sheets for each of the two (2) segments surveyed as well as those for segmen ts previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

 Posted speed limit
 Direction of survey
 Date and time of speed survey
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed in each direction
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 15th percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent under pace speed
 Average speed

The summary contains information about vehicu lar speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 217

7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1
(May 2022)

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street

N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usa
ge, no bike lanes
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I- 15)
E/W None 2 59 55 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 (Continued on Next Page)
218

7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1
(May 2022)

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

8 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1 (Continued)

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
38 Riverside Drive Hamne r Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduce - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 39 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None2 43 40 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray.
2,One segment, currently studied (No. 14), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 3 See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA law, AB 43. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for expl anations of Option 1 and Option 2. 220

9 Survey Results

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis

The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segm ent was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collisio n data for the two (2) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2022. Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were cal culated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”

It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 10
6 Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data

Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue betwee n Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue:

Collision Rate = 10 x 10
6 18,890 x 365 x 1.00 x 3

= 0.48 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)

The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2019 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the two (2) segments stud ied in the 2022 analysis, and are as follows:

No.

Street

Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
14 Cantu-Galleano I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave 1.18
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 1.14

221

10 Table 2: Collision Analysis 1
(Amended September 2022)

Street

Between

Segment Length
(mile)

Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
(3 yr total)
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM)3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 3
4 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 5,400 1 0.25 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3755 1 0.24 0.93 No Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 8
9 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20934 7 0.19 1.29 No Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 20 21
22 23
24 25
Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 19,500 5 0.42 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 1.34 7,080 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 29
30 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No 31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 33 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7806 4 0.62 1.32 No 37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 39 40
41 42
Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 5,600 4 1.55 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4721 0 0.00 0.91 No Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6678 1 0.20 1.60 No 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 3 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 222

11 Survey Results

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review

Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The roadway segments were driven by Ms. Angelina Miralaie, Traffic Engineer (contracted through Interwest). The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were recorded as part of the study in Strip Maps Found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the reco mmended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.

The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Lack of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Nearby schools and parks
 Adjacent land uses
223
Survey Findings and Recommendations
12 SECTION 4.0

SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.

 Most recent collision record (mid-block)
 Roadway characteristics
 Shoulder condition
 Grade
 Alignment
 Sight Distance
 Roadside development and environment
 Parking practices and pedestrian activity
 Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
 Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
 Residential density

The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engin eering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows th e surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 224
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 4.1 Speed Limit Signing

All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.

225
Summary and Conclusions

14 SECTION 5.0

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 6, Section 2B.13.

2. Daily traffic counts for two (2) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2022 on May 18th.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.

5. It was concluded that the existing speed limit on one of the two (2) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed, as listed below.

Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit

No.

Street

Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Avenue and I-15
Freeway None 50 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile

5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance

Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as follows:
226

ORDINANCE NO. 23‐XX (DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per ho ur on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; an
d
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under Calif
ornia Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. ‐ Findings.
(a) Th
e City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of th e survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

Street

Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 65th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
DRAFT
227

7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8   Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9   Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu‐Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue to I‐15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17   Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 21   Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22   Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23   Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road 55 24   Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25   Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 55
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I‐15) 59 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49 37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 40   Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
41   Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
42   Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 39
44 Scholar Way Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43 45   Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
DRAFT
228

48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40

(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above‐ listed streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. ‐ Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No.

Street

Between

(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3   Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4   Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8   Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9   Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu‐Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue and I‐15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17   Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 21   Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22   Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23   Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road 50
24   Cantu‐Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
25   Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 27
Harrison Avenue
Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
DRAFT
229

31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I‐15) 55 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40 37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 40   Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
41   Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
42   Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
44   Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
45   Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35

Sec. 10.02.030 ‐ Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect."

SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, claus e, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January, 2023.

__________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

DRAFT
230

__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
DRAFT
231

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23‐XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December, 2022, and was pa ssed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
DRAFT
232
233
ORDINANCE NO. 22-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE
10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED

LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of TitlelO to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated January 2022)
262

263
1 Appendix A

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of an Engineer ing and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehi cle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic co llisions recorded during the specific three-year interval of August 1, 2 019 through July 31, 2022, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.

In order to enforce speed limits by radar or ot her electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineer ing and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the da te of the alleged violation…” c onstitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:

If officers have completed specialized tr aining courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.

If after seven years, “ …a registered engine er evaluates the secti on of the highway and determines that no significant changes in ro adway or traffic condi tions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.

Since speed traps are illegal, th e lack of an adequate study effe ctively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 264
2 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS

Under California law, the max imum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph ma y be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such survey s include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those dr ivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also proh ibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits

22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whicheve r is found most appropria te to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic a nd is reasonable and safe. The d eclared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits

22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 265
3 Appendix A

40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Downward Speed Zoning

22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that phy sical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Maintaining Existing Speed Limit

22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the lo cal authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.

Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit

22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity di strict” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or ne ighborhood downtowns, urba n villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail 266
4 Appendix A

or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open dir ectly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022. Section 22358.7, which is referenced, will not go into effect until 2024, and is, therefore, not included in this document as an applicable CVC section.

Speed Trap

40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1 ) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged viola tion, and enforcement of the spee d limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the sp eed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street , road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one th at is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are a pproved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by th e Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning, and became effective on January 1, 2022.):

(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterru pted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
267
5 Appendix A

(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, whil e children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or duri ng the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing an y schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physic al barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by seni or citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business ac tivity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit ahs been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2 ) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:

(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successf ully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an addi tional training c ourse of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer es tablished that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alle ged violation unless the cita tion was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to di stance and with boundaries 268
6 Appendix A

marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or st ate highway with a pr ima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prio r to the date of th e alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Speed Trap Evidence.

40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or othe r electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the a lleged violation or evidence th at the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or te stimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey

627. (a) “Engineering and tr affic survey” as used in this Co de, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with me thods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.

(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other re quirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following 269
7 Appendix A

1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Collision records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic su rvey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occ upied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectivel y, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one- quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, senior s, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Business District

235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupi ed by buildings in use for busine ss, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district ma y be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of bu ildings in use for busine ss to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District

515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, w ithin a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting th ereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or busine ss structures, or (b) upon bot h sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business st ructures. A residence 270
8 Appendix A

district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination

240. In determining whether a high way is within a business or re sidence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:

a) No building shall be counted unless its entr ance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.

b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.

c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.

d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Maximum Speed Limit

22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law

22350. No person shall drive a vehi cle upon a highway at a speed gr eater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibili ty, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations

22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.

(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

271
9 Appendix A

Prima Facie Speed Limits

22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:

(a) Fifteen miles per hour:

1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.

2) When traversing any intersection of highw ays if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffi c upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right- of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.

3) On any alley.

(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:

1) On any highway other than a state highwa y, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.

2) When passing a school building or the gr ounds thereof, conti guous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during sc hool hours or during the noon recess period.

Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.

3) When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street othe r than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.

Boundary Line Streets

22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having juri sdiction of the portions of the street concerned 272
10 Appendix A

have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways

22361. On multiple-lane highways w ith two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different ro adways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

Speed Trap Prohibition

40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a sp eed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

273

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated June 2021)
274

275
1 Appendix B

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated June 2021)

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see
Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 276
2 Appendix B

mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.

Option:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f).

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f). 277
3 Appendix B

Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:

CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
278
4 Appendix B

24 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
25 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 26 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
27 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
28 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. 279
5 Appendix B

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
29 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
30 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

Guidance:
31 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report. 32 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
280
6 Appendix B

Support:
33 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
34 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 35 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
36 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
37 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
38 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 39 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
40 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
41 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
42 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 43 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
44 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
45 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
281
Standard:
7 Appendix B

46 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
47 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 48 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
49 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
50 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
51 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
52 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
53 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 54 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
55 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
282
Standard:
8 Appendix B

• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
56 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
57 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs gi ving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
59 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
60 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
61 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
64 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
65 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
66 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
67 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar. 283
9 Appendix B

Guidance:
68 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
69 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
70 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
72 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
73 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
74 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
75 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
76 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 77 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
78 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
79 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
80 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
81 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
82 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
284
10 Appendix B

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
83 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
84 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
85 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
86 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
87 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
88 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
90 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
• The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
• Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
• A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law. 285
11 Appendix B

Speed Traps
Support:
92 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
93 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 94 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 95 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
97 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
98 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
99 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
100 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
101 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
102 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
286
12 Appendix B

Support:
103 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
104 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
105 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part

6. Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
106 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
107 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
287
13 Appendix B

Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD

Text Headings

Standard—a statement of required, m andatory, or specific ally prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineerin g judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are la beled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice t hat is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, pr ohibition, or enforceable condit ion. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases

Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed —the summation of t he instantaneous or spot-m easured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed —a speed at which a typical vehicl e or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range repr esenting the speeds of th e largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
288
14 Appendix B

Speed Limit —the maximum (or minimum) speed applic able to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highwa y with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with spec ified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) —the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been desi gnated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronti ng thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 per cent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refe r to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under Cali fornia Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to Calif ornia Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of availa ble pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the pur pose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 289
15 Appendix B

exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervi sion of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study —the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engin eering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in th is Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon t he applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an e ngineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excl udes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges , and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same dire ction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skate s, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electr ic personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities —a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway im proved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bi cycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared- use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelcha irs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized user s. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
290
16 Appendix B

Shoulder – The portion of the highwa y contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a str eet between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other dev ice used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a stree t, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or , in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public tr avel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
291

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated September 2022)

292

293
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30 , 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586

0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Commen
ts:

Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
294
295
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No

0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
296
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642

0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 m
ph due to ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comment
s:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
297
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segm ent No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260

1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer• :

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
298
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Lim it Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Sm
ith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
299
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: N
orth/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:

Commen
ts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700

1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
300
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580

1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
301
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisma n Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010

1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
302
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Term inus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from
40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030

0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Cul-de-sac near River Road.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
303
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Ham ner Avenue Segment No.: 11 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650

1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.

Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
304
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575

0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comme
nts:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
305
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comme
nts:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
306
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.18 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323

0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
307
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075

1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
308
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.14 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.

Comments:

Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
12/15/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.
309
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.39 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626

0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
310
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curves.

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
311
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:

Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600

0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.

Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�.'-vk Vl-1 Qn-:: 7 /Jo/Zo,ei t I ,_ �11. •' Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date �,,,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 0, � Segment #19 312
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295

0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
313
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
314
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800

0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway width reductions.

Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
315
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:

Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
North/South
Traffic Data
19,500
4,400

0.83 Lane Configuration: 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.42
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Retail, commercial, big box and undeveloped Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: Existing
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
'::h:: l/1'1 �
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
7 / ls2. l Zac..er'
Date
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group r� � �;,- 1T� �
I �,. I ,_ � I
�Fil Segment #23
316
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;!
J} Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 317
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�Wlµt- 1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#25 318
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
319
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Blossom Way
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080

1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
320
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100

0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
321
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120

1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
322
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070

0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
323
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:

Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

C
;i,-
1Y
H!lt:t s
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. 7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (, • Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment#31 324
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
6'�) � VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I I ll:IO �)!,

1. #
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#32 325
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.

Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
326
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 34
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
327
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380

0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
328
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970

0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.

Agricultural land west of Hall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
329
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500

0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
330
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:

Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.

Comments:

Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� '--t,,t,_ 11--- j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1I. ;;
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#38 331
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
332
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
333
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 41
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
334
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040

0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
335
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Scholar Way Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 5,600
Length of Segment (feet): 3,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.63
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 39 mph
10 mph Pace: 29-38 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 4
Collision Rate (Collisions/MVM): 1.55
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes except for partial Class ll NB.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. Southerly part of segment uses delineators to control U-turns and ped Xings.

Comments:

High school, intermediate school, elementary school & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & schools
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
0 ��
'-/;k � 4:1:::: 7££f2. L201t:1. ;I
,i:. • Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group � Segment#43 336
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
337
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700

0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.

Roadway Geometrics:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
338
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935

1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
339
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422

1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
340
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542

0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.

Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
341
342

APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated September 2022)

343

344

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE

0.49 mi

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET

UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North

SCHOLAR WAY

JAMESTOWN AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
• 35 MPH
345
346

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)

0.31 mi

RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
35 MPH •

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
• 35 MPH

347

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

SUMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
68TH STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
348

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET

0.5 mi

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
I-15 INTERSTATE HWY

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •

WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
349

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET

1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

RIVER STREET

ARCHIBALD
AVENUE

WIND RIVER RD

BARONROAD
BLUFF

GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
350

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD
WIND

RIVER RD

GRAPEWIN
STREET

CHANDLER STREET

FIELDMASTER
STREET

SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK

EASTVALEPKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
351

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

INDUSTRIAL

ARCHI BALD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
352
353
354

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT

0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •

BELLEGRAVE AVENUECITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL

INTERSTATE HWY

CITY LIMIT
355

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BLOSSOM WAY

HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.5 mi

BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CEDAR CREEK ROAD
30 MPH •
• 30 MPH

REDSIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
30 MPH •

PINE GROVE PL
356
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALENorth
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY.50 mi CANTU-GALLEANORANCHRD.

COMMERCIALLIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< LIMIT(I-15)HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHTINDUSTRIALGOODMAN RD.&IT< LIMIT

LIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH
357

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE

1.53 mi

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

SELBY AVENUE

SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
358
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALENorth

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREETHARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY0

PL
SCHOLAR WAY• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPHRESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALHIGH SCHOOLPARK
• 40 MPH

COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE

COBBLE CREEK DRIVERESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
359

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL
ವ MP+

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
ವ MP+

HIGH SCHOOL

RESIDENTIAL
PARK

CARROLLTON PLACE

MAYFIELD STREET
360

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North

FIELDMASTER STREET

HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi

RESIDENTIAL

FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
EK

C
H
E
R
R
Y

MEADOW
BROOK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK

HALL RD

ARCHIBALD AVE
361

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi

CITRUS STREET

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH

FAIR GROUNDS

RESIDENTIALPARK
362

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
363

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER

HAMNER AVENUE

0.91 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH

SWAN LAKE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
364

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CHANDLER STREET
North

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH

NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
365
366

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD TO

0.97 mi

CONSERVATION
AREA

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

CHANDLER STREET

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1)50 MPH •

UNDEVELOPED

CHANDLER STREET
367

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITHELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

UNDEVELOPED
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
50 MPH •
SCHOOL

WALTERS STREET

ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKET
STREET

PINE AVENUE

PRAIRIE SMOKE
ROAD

LANDERWOOD DRIVE

BICKMORE AVENUE

1.54 mi

CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE

LIMONITE AVE
PARK

INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL

KIMBALL AVENUE

CHINO CORONA ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
368

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

NOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE

LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT

0.20 mi

HELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

INDUSTRIAL

LIMONITE AVE

INDUSTRIAL

SUMMIT DR

INDUSTRIAL

HELLMAN AVENU

CITY LIMIT

ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)

1.54 mi

KIMBALL AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

INDUSTRIAL
369

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD

MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS(I-15)

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL
60 MPH •
370

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

ORANGE STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL

ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •

SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH

SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE

RESIDENTIAL
371

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD

0.26 mi

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
372

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVER ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE

0.75 mi

NOT TO SCALE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

HALL ROAD

AGRICULTURE

AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
373
374

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHI BALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH

CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

COMMERCIAL
375

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD
SUMNER

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

HARRISON
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL

COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUE
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
376

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED45 MPH •
377

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE

0.58 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN

HAMMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
378

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

SCHOLAR WAY

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHOLAR

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

LIMONITE AVE
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)WAY

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
379
380

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET

1.12 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER

CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
381

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

1.03 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

ORCHARD
PARK

SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT
382

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

WHITEWELL ROAD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

0.29 mi

NOT TO SCALE

WHITEWELL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH

PRAIRIE

SMOKE RD
383
384

APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated September 2022)

385

386
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:05
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
387
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
388
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
389
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *
45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
390
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C
42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
391
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:00
62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:25
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH 56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A
52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79% 47 2 2 47 X X X X 4
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH
43 0 0 43 0
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
392
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 4 0 58 X X X X 4
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:05
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:30
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
393
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
394
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *
33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 0 1 32 X 1 A
31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%
29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 6
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
395
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:20
52 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 7
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:40
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A
43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
396
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:55
59 0 0 59 0
58 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 2 0 56 X X 2
55 3 2 55 X X X X X 5
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 *
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13% 45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5
42 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
397
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:10
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:50
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%
29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%
27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%
25 2 2 25 X X X X 4
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
398
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 4 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 5 3 51 X X X X X X X X 8 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 *
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 38% 44% 41%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 C
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 60% 54% 56%
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 2% 2% 3%
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 *
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43MPH 35 - 44MPH 35 - 44MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22
399
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 6
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:40
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:15
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
400
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47MPH 38 - 47MPH 38 - 47MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22
401
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:40
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 0 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:00
49 1 1 49 X X 2 *
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E
43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
402
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:30
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:20
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing 37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 1 0 34 X 1
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5
32 2 0 32 X X 2
31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
403
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 0 0 45 0
44 3 0 44 X X X 3 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 10:45
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 2 3 40 X X X X X 5 * To: 11:55
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 * Existing
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH
36 5 3 36 X X X X X X X X 8 A
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
31 0 8 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 16% 28% 25%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 76% 60% 65%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
404
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:20
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:40
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%
49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E
46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11% 45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 0 3 41 X X X 3
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 38 0 1 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
405
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time
50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:20
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
406
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:50
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:10
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing
47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%
37 0 0 37 0
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
407
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 1 63 X 1 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 1 1 62 X X 2
61 0 0 61 0
60 1 1 60 X X 2 Weather: Clear
59 1 1 59 X X 2
58 1 0 58 X 1
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 Date:
56 3 3 56 X X X X X X 6
55 3 1 55 X X X X 4
54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 * Time
53 4 3 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:25
52 5 2 52 X X X X X X X 7 *
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 P Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 A To: 10:45
49 4 5 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 3 6 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 5 1 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 1 0 40 X 1 % Over Pace: 18% 26% 23%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 66% 66% 66%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
408
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive 62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 1 61 X 1
60 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 1 1 58 X X 2
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:
56 1 3 56 X X X X 4
55 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:55
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P
51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time
50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:15
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
409
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / PMPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound StatisticsSouthbound StatisticsCombined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51MPH 41 - 50MPH 41 - 50MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
410
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 2 56 X X 2
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:10
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time
50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:30
49 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing
47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
411
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:50
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:20
49 4 2 49 X X X X X X 6
48 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C
41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%
39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
412
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:00
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P
52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A
51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13% 49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *
48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH
43 0 1 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
413
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue) 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:00
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:25
59 0 1 59 X 1
58 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5
55 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *
52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P
51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%
49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E
48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 6
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
414
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
415
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 7
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time
53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:45
52 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *
51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time
50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:05
49 1 2 49 X X X 3 C
48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 2 3 44 X X X X X 5
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%
37 3 0 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
416
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 4 1 56 X X X X X 5
55 2 2 55 X X X X 4
54 2 0 54 X X 2 Time
53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:05
52 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:25
49 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A
48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing
47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 6
42 0 4 42 X X X X 4
41 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
417
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
418
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:20
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:15
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%
35 0 4 35 X X X X 4
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
419
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:00
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C
34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%
29 4 0 29 X X X X 4
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4
26 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%
25 3 0 25 X X X 3
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
420
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49MPH 42 - 51MPH 41 - 50MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
421
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:20
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%
37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 4
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 3 30 X X X 3
29 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
422
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 12:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:45
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *
45 8 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 P
43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
42 8 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 14% 18% 16%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 82% 74% 78%
37 1 1 37 X X 2
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 8% 6%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
423
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 2 0 55 X X 2
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:15
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:35
49 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
424
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:50
59 3 2 59 X X X X X 5
58 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P
54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A
53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C
52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%
49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 2 0 43 X X 2
42 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 1 40 X 1
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
425
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:30
52 3 1 52 X X X X 4
51 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:50
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C
45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
426
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 1 54 X X 2 Time
53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:55
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing
47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%
39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
427
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 To: 9:25
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 6 2 35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 2 4 34 X X X X X X 6 A
33 2 2 33 X X X X 4 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 5 3 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 26% 12% 27% 29 1 5 29 X X X X X X 6 *
28 2 1 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 64% 70% 64%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 10% 18% 9%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 28 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
428
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:25
42 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:00
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing
37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4
31 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
429
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:20
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:40
39 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 0 4 34 X X X X 4
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 1 1 32 X X 2
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%
29 2 0 29 X X 2
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
430
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:00
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:25
49 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
431
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 3 56 X X X 3
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:00
52 0 2 52 X X 2 *
51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time
50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:20
49 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E
45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
432
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing
37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 0 2 35 X X 2 P
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A
33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%
29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
433
434

APPENDIX F
Collision Data Sheets
Updated September 2022

435

436
Mid-Block Collisions
58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

437
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

438
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

439
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

440
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

441
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

442
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

443
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

444
Mid-Block Collisions
Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

445
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

446
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

447
Mid-Block Collisions
Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

448
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

(Continued on Next Page)

449
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 2)

(Continued on Next Page)

450
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 3)

451
Mid-Block Collisions
Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

452
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

453
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

454
Mid-Block Collisions
Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

455
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Citrus Street/South City Limit and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

456
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

(Continued on Next Page)

457
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 2)

458
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

(Continued on Next Page)

459
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 2)

(Continued on Next Page)

460
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 3)

461
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

462
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

463
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between River Road and Chandler Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

464
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

465
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Limonite Ave and North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

466
Mid-Block Collisions
Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

467
Mid-Block Collisions
Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

468
Mid-Block Collisions
Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

469
Mid-Block Collisions
River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

470
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverboat Drive between Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

471
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

(Continued on Next Page)

472
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 2)

473
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

474
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

475
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

476
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

477
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

478
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

479
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

480
Mid-Block Collisions
Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.

481
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP

(Continued on Next Page)

482
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 2)

(Continued on Next Page)

483
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 3)

484

APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
(Updated September 2022)
485

486
487
488
ORDINANCE NO. 23-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 65th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
489
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 55
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 39
44 Scholar Way Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
490
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 (b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above- listed streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No. Street Between (mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 27
Harrison Avenue
Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
491
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January, 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
492
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
493

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
494

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.10
January 11, 2023
Approval of Payment for the Annual Permit Fees to State Water Resources Control Board for Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve payment to State Water Resources Control Board for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Annual Permit.

Summary
The State Water Quality Control Boards (Water Board) adopted the Na,onal Pollutant Discharge Elimina,on System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permits to regulate storm water for municipali,es. The MS4 permits require the discharger to develop and implement a Storm Water Management Plan/Program with the goal of reducing the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent prac,cable. The annual permit fee amount is based on popula,on. The City of Eastvale's permit fee for fiscal year 2022/2023 is $26,498.00.

Background
The City of Eastvale, along with other ci,es, partner with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conserva,on District (RCFC) to jointly submit NPDES applica,on for re-issuance of MS4 permit. The MS4 permit contains limits on what can be discharged, monitoring and repor,ng requirements, and other provisions to ensure that the discharge does not hurt water quality or people's health. The permit translates general requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) into speciﬁc provisions tailored to the opera,ons of discharging pollutants. Without the city's ability to issue MS4 permits, development applicants would be required to obtain their MS4 permits directly from the County of Riverside.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
495
Environmental
The issuance of an NPDES permit is exempt from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Chapter 3 of Division 13 of the Public Resources Code, in accordance with CWA Sec,on 13389. The payment of the fee by the City is a ﬁscal ac,vity and is not a project for the purposes of CEQA.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 3
Plan for landscape, roads, and street maintenance
Fiscal Impact
The total ﬁscal impact is $26,498.00. There is suﬃcient budget in the General Fund - Storm Drain Maintenance (100-500-6435) to pay for the above recommended annual permit.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
There is no prior City Council/Commission Action.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Waterboard Annual Permit Fee

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
496
497
498
499

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

PUBLIC HEARINGS

Agenda Item No. 12.1
January 11, 2023
Adop*on of 2022 Building, Residen*al, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Historical Building, Exis*ng Building, Referenced Standards, Green Building Standards Code, Fire Code and Administrative Code
Prepared By:

Richard Hicks, Building Official
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing and adopt the following Ordinances:
2022 Eastvale Administrative Code
2022 Eastvale Building Code (as amended from 2022 California Building Code) 2022 Eastvale Residential Code (as amended from 2022 California Residential Code) 2022 Eastvale Green Code (as adopted from 2022 California Green Code) 2022 Eastvale Electrical Code
2022 Eastvale Energy Code
2022 Eastvale Mechanical Code
2022 Eastvale Historical Code
2022 Eastvale Plumbing Code
2022 Eastvale Referenced Standard Code
2022 Eastvale Existing Building Code
2022 Eastvale Fire Code
Summary
As required by State law, the City of Eastvale adopts a compila,on of building regula,ons every three years as a result of the California Building Standards Commission update cycle. These 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
500
regula,ons are commonly referred to as the “Building Code.” State law allows the City to make local amendments to the Building Code. Local amendments to the Building Code that change substan,ve requirements must be supported by ﬁndings that local geologic, topographic, or clima,c condi,ons warrant a more stringent requirement.

Background
The California Building Standards Commission (hereina:er the “Building Standards Commission”) is an independent commission within the State Consumer Services Agency responsible for reviewing, adop,ng, and publishing building standards for the State of California. The Building Standards Commission adopts a compila,on of building regula,ons every three years. These regula,ons, which are commonly referred to as the “Building Code,” include:

California Building Code;
California Residential Code;
California Electrical Code;
California Mechanical Code;
California Plumbing Code;
California Energy Code;
California Fire Code;
California Historical Building Code;
California Existing Building Code;
California Referenced Standards Code; and
California Green Building Standards Code.

Through the code adop,on process, the Building Standards Commission selects and approves a model code that will apply statewide. The 2022 codes adopted by the Building Standards Commission strive to make all structures more energy eﬃcient and structurally safer over the 2019 codes. As part of these codes, Chapters 11A and 11B of the Building Code contain the accessibility standards for residen,al and commercial developments. In the State of California, these two chapters are consistent with the American with Disability Act (ADA).

Local jurisdic,ons are authorized to further modify the code to add more restric,ve provisions based on their speciﬁc local geologic, clima,c, and topographic condi,ons. All local amendments must be more restric,ve than the State Codes and must be substan,ated with ﬁndings, per California Health & Safety Code Section 17958.

For the City of Eastvale, the “Building Code” is contained within Part B (Land Development Code) of the Municipal Code. The Building Standards Commission does not adopt the administra,on chapter of the California Codes therefor the City Council of Eastvale also needs to adopt its own administra,on chapter. Local amendments are contained in the aCached ordinances and are intended to address the unique condi,ons that the City of Eastvale incurs, such as being in a liquefac,on area and large seismic zone. The proposed local amendments are structural requirements. Staﬀ does not believe this addi,onal restric,on will create an undue burden on homeowners and developers. A summary of the local amendments is discussed below:

Administrative Code
Section 110.02.001-110.02.090
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
501
Adop,on of Administra,ve Code which establishes the administra,ve requirements for all the adopted codes.

Building Code
Section 110.40.001-110.40.031
The amendments to these sections are related to structural changes.

Residential Code
SECTIONS 110.05.001-110.05.024
The amendments to these sections are related to structural.

Green Building Standards Code
SECTIONS 110.06
Adoption of California Green Building Code with no amendments.

Electrical Code
SECTIONS 110.08
Adoption of California Electric Code with no amendments.

Energy Code
SECTION 110.09
Adoption of California Energy Code with no amendments.

Mechanical Code
SECTIONS 110.12
Adoption of California Mechanical Code with no amendments.

Historical Building Code
Section 110.13
Adoption of California Historical Building Code with no amendments.

Plumbing Code
SECTION 110.16
Adoption of California Plumbing Code with no amendments.

Referenced Standards Code
Section 110.17
Adoption of California Referenced Standards Code with no amendments.

Existing Building Code
Section 110.19
Adoption of California Existing Building Code with no amendments.

Fire Code
Section 110.20.10-110.20.30
Adoption of California Fire Code with sprinkler systems administrative amendments.

The 2022 California Codes became eﬀec,ve on January 1, 2023 and apply to any project submiCed for plan check thereafter.

Environmental
The City Council ﬁnds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sec,ons 15060(c)(2) (the ac,vity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the ac,vity is not a project as deﬁned in Sec,on 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regula,ons, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no poten,al for resul,ng in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. The City Council hereby directs City staﬀ to ﬁle a No,ce of Exemp,on with the Clerk of Riverside County within five (5) days of the adoption of this Ordinance. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
502
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
The City adopts building regula,ons every three years therefor it does not fall into any strategic plan action.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of this request will not have an impact to the General Fund.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
First reading approved on December 14, 2022
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2022 Eastvale Existing Building Code .docx

Attachment 2 - 2022 Eastvale Plumbing Code .docx

Attachment 3 - 2022 Eastvale Residential Code .docx

Attachment 4 - 2022 Eastvale Mechanical Code .docx

Attachment 5 - 2022 Eastvale Energy Code .docx

Attachment 6 - 2022 Eastvale Green Building Standards Code .docx

Attachment 7 - 2022 Eastvale Electrical Code .docx

Attachment 8 - 2022 Eastvale Referenced Standard Code .docx

Attachment 9 - 2022 Eastvale Building Code Ordinance .docx

Attachment 10 - 2022 Eastvale Fire Code.docx

Attachment 11 - 2022 Eastvale Administrative Code .docx

Attachment 12 - 2022 Eastvale Historical Building Code .docx

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
503
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.19 (EXISTING BUILDING CODE) OF THE

EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 10)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 110.19 (Existing Building Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.19

EXISTING BUILDING CODE
SECTION 110.19. Adoption by Reference of California Existing Building Code . Those certain documents, one copy each, are on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk entitled " Existing Building Code”, published by the California Building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 10) and everything contained therein is hereby adopted by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the Government Code, as a part of this Chapter.”
SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

SECTION5.: Wherever there is reference to the California Existing Building Code, it shall mean the California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition, promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
505
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
506
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
507
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.16 (PLUMBING CODE) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 5)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 110.16 (Plumbing Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Chapter 110.16

PLUMBING CODE
SECTION 110.16.010 Adoption by Reference of California Plumbing Code. That certain document, one copy of which is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk, entitled "California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition," International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), contained in chapters 2-17 as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission, and appendices B-D, and K, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5) and is hereby adopted and made a part of this Chapter by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the California Government Code, as part of this Chapter.”
SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

Moreover, State law provides that the 2022 Building Codes will take effect in the City even if the City does not adopt this ordinance, as is required by law. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file a Notice of Exemption with the Clerk of Riverside County within five (5) days of the adoption of this Ordinance
SECTION 3. That when this Ordinance takes effect, it shall not change any of the provisions of the previous codes and Ordinances or affect any offense, acts done or required to be done, penalties, forfeitures or punishments incurred, rights or liabilities accrued or claims arising out of the provisions of the previous Ordinances and amendments. Any pending actions shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. Any previous discontinuance, abatement, or liabilities of any person shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. 508
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2

SECTION 5. That wherever there is reference to the California Plumbing Code, it shall mean the 2021 Plumbing Code promulgated by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (“IAPMO”) as amended by the State of California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. 509
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
511
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.05 (RESIDENTIAL CODE) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 2.5) AND MAKING LOCAL

AMENDMENTS THERETO
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.5, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that a city or county may make such changes or modifications to the requirements contained in the California Building Standards Code which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and, WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that prior to making any change or modification to the California Building Standards Code authorized by the Health & Safety Code, the City Council of Eastvale is required to make an express finding that such modifications or changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards Code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is in a liquefaction zone; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is in Climate Zone 11 and, therefore, is required to have more stringent energy efficiency requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is subject to ground tremors from large seismic events along, but not limited to, the San Andreas Fault.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Findings. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the 2022 California Residential Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geologic of topographic conditions, and adopts the findings provided below to support the modifications to the 2022 California Residential Code. The City Council further finds that some changes and modifications are of an administrative or procedural nature or concern themselves with subjects not covered by the code or are reasonably necessary to safeguard life and property within the City. The City Council hereby adopts the following (Climatic, geological, and topographical, where applicable) findings to support the proposed amendments to the 2022 California Residential Code made in this Ordinance:

I. Climatic Conditions
A. The jurisdiction of the City of Eastvale (or, “City”) is located in a warm Mediterranean type climate. It annually experiences extended periods of high temperatures with little or no precipitation. For example, during July, August and 512
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2
September, temperatures often exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit. During the same months humidity is usually less than 40%, and humidity measurements less than 10% are not uncommon. These conditions contribute to an increased likelihood of fire. Frequent periods of drought and low humidity add to the fire danger. This predisposes the area to large destructive fires (conflagration). In addition to directly damaging or destroying buildings, these fires are also prone to disrupt utility services throughout the City. .

B. Water demand in this densely populated area far exceeds the quantity supplied by natural precipitation; and although the population continues to grow, the already-taxed water supply does not. California is projected to increase in population by nearly 10 million over the next quarter of a century with 50 percent of that growth centered in Southern California. Due to storage capacities and consumption, and a limited amount of rainfall, future water allocation is not fully dependable. This necessitates the need for additional and on-site fire protection features. It would also leave tall buildings vulnerable to uncontrolled fires due to a lack of available water and an inability to pump sufficient quantities of available water to floors in a fire.

C. These dry climatic conditions contribute to the rapid spread of even small fires originating in high-density housing or vegetation. These fires spread very quickly and create a need for increased levels of fire protection. The added protection of fire sprinkler systems and other fire protection features will supplement normal fire department response by providing immediate protection for the building occupants and by containing and controlling the fire spread to the area of origin. Fire sprinkler systems will also reduce the use of water for firefighting by as much as 50 to 75 percent.

II. Topographical conditions
A. Development has occurred in the City and continues to occur in the City and such development has resulted in severe traffic congestion during peak business hours, weekends and holidays, thus decreasing the response time of fire and emergency service vehicles, particularly on the following streets: Limonite Avenue, Hammer Avenue, Archibald Avenue and River Road.

B. These topographical conditions combine to create a situation which places fire department response time to fire occurrences at risk and makes it necessary to provide automatic on-site fire-extinguishing systems and other protection measures to protect occupants and property. Due to these topographical conditions and the expected infrastructure damage inherent in seismic zones described below, it is prudent to rely on automatic fire sprinkler systems to mitigate extended fire department response time and keep fires manageable with reduced fire flow (water) requirements for a given structure. Numerous fires have occurred within the City in residential structures (houses, apartments, hotels, motels, and dormitories) over the past several years that have automatic fire protection systems, and in all of these fires, the automatic fire protection systems have successfully controlled and/or suppressed the fire before the emergency response personnel have been able to arrive at the structure.

Additional fire protection is also justified to match the current resources of firefighting equipment and personnel within the fire department. 513
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3
III. Geological Conditions
A. The City of Eastvale is located in Southern California, in an extremely active seismic region, with high levels of historic earthquake shaking in the recent past (earthquakes measuring larger than a magnitude 5 on the Richter Scale) and can be expected to experience significant strong ground shaking within the foreseeable future.

B. The seismotectonic setting of the City is dominated by the Chino-Central Avenue fault. The City is also near the Whitter Fault, which is located 9 miles, and the Elsinore fault, located 9 miles. In the event of a severe earthquake, these faults present the potential for catastrophic damage, including fire, damage to roadways and other impairments of emergency apparatus. Existing and planned developments are at risk from structural damage from earthquake faults.

Improved standards are necessary to ensure that maximum safety is provided to persons and property.

C. Previous earthquakes have been accompanied by disruption of traffic flow and fires. A severe seismic event has the potential to negatively impact any rescue or fire suppression activities because it is likely to create obstacles similar to those indicated under the high wind section above. This situation creates the need for both additional fire protection and automatic on-site fire protection for building occupants.
514
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4
IV. The findings above are applicable to the Amendments to the 2022 California Residential Code as follows:
2022
CRC Section
Amended TITLE/DESCRIPTION
Findings
l, ll, lll
R301.1.3.2 Amend CRC Section R301.1.3.2 Woodframe Structures lll R301.1.5 Add CRC Section R301.1.5 Seismic Design Provisions for Buildings on Slopes Steeper than 33%
lll
R301.2.2.6 Amend CRC Items 1, 3 and 5 of Section R301.2.2.6 Irregular Buildings
lll
R301.2.2.11 Add CRC Section R301.2.2.11 Anchorage of Mechanical, Electrical, or Plumbing Components and Equipment
lll
R401.1 Amend CRC Section R401.1 Application lll
R403.1.2,
R403.1.3.6
and R403.1.5
Amend CRC Sections R403.1.2, R403.1.3.6, R403.1.5 General Footings
lll
R404.2 Amend CRC Section R404.2 Wood Foundation Walls lll R501.2 Amend CRC Section R501.2 Application lll
R503.2.4 Add CRC Section R503.2.4 Openings In Horizontal Diaphragms lll Table
R602.3(1)
Amend CRC Table R602.3(1) Fastening Schedule lll
R602.32 and
Table
R602.3.2
Amend CRC Section R602.3.2 and Table R602.3.2 Top Plate lll Table
R602.3(2)
Amend CRC Table R602.3(2) Alternate Attachments to Table R602.3(1)
lll
R602.10.2.3 Amend CRC Section R602.10.2.3 Minimum Number of Braced Wall Panels
lll
Table
R602.10.3(3)
Amend CRC Table R602.10.3(3) Bracing Requirements Based on Seismic Design Category
lll
Table
R602.10.4
Amend CRC Table R602.10.4 Bracing Methods lll
Table
R602.10.5
Amend CRC Table R602.10.5 Minimum Length of Braced Wall Panels
lll
Figure
R602.10.6.1
Amend CRC Figure R602.10.6.1 Method ABW - Alternate Braced Wall Panel
lll
Figure
R602.10.6.2
Amend CRC Figure R602.10.6.2 Method PFH - Portal Frame with Hold-downs at Detached Garage Door Openings
lll
Figure
R602.10.6.4
Amend CRC Figure R602.10.6.4 Method CS-PF - Continuously Sheathed Portal Framed Construction
lll
R606.4.4 Amend CRC Section R606.4.4 Parapet Walls lll
R606.12.2.2.3 Amend CRC Section R606.12.2.2.3 Reinforcement Requirements for Masonry Elements
lll
R803.2.4 Add CRC Section R803.2.4 Openings in Horizontal Diaphragms lll R1001.3.1 Amend CRC Section R1001.3.1 Vertical Reinforcing lll SECTION 2: That Chapter 110.05 (Residential Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
515
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 5
“CHAPTER 110.05

RESIDENTIAL CODE
SECTION 110.05.010 – Adoption by Reference of California Residential Code. Except as provided herein, Chapters 2-35 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2.5), based upon the 2021 International Residential Code, including Appendix H (Patio Covers), K (Sound Transmission), Q, (Tiny Homes), V (Swimming Pool Safety Act) are hereby adopted by reference as fully set forth herein, and shall constitute and is hereby established as the “Eastvale Residential Code”. A copy of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public.

SECTION 110.05.020 – Section R301.1.3.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R301.1.3.2 Woodframe structures. The building official shall require construction documents to be approved and stamped by a California licensed architect or engineer for all dwellings of woodframe construction more than two stories and basement in height located in Seismic Design Category A, B or C. Notwithstanding other sections of law; the law establishing these provisions is found in Business and Professions Code Sections 5537 and 6737.1.

The building official shall require construction documents to be approved and stamped by a California licensed architect or engineer for all dwellings of woodframe construction more than one story in height or with a basement located in Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2.

SECTION 110.05.030 - Section R301.1.5 is added to Chapter 3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code to read as follows:

R301.1.5 Seismic design provisions for buildings constructed on or into slopes steeper than one unit vertical in three units horizontal (33.3 percent slope). The design and construction of new buildings and additions to existing buildings when constructed on or into slopes steeper than one unit vertical in three units horizontal (33.3 percent slope) shall comply with Section 1613.6 of the California Building Code.

SECTION 110.05.040 -Items 1, 3 and 5 of Section R301.2.2.6 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code are amended to read as follows:

1. Shear wall or braced wall offsets out of plane . Conditions where exterior shear wall lines or braced wall panels are not in one plane vertically from the foundation to the uppermost story in which they are required.

3. Shear wall or braced wall offsets in plane. Conditions where the end of a braced wall panel occurs over an opening in the wall below.

5. Floor level offset. Conditions where portions of a floor level are vertically offset.

SECTION 110.05.050 - Section R301.2.2.11 is added to Chapter 3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code to read as follows:

R301.2.2.11 Anchorage of mechanical, electrical, or plumbing components and equipment. Mechanical, electrical, or plumbing components and equipment shall be anchored to the structure. Anchorage of the components and equipment shall be designed 516
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 6
to resist loads in accordance with the California Building Code and ASCE 7, except where the component is positively attached to the structure and flexible connections are provided between the component and associated ductwork, piping, and conduit; and either

1. The component weighs 400 lb (1,780 N) or less and has a center of mass located 4 ft (1.22 m) or less above the supporting structure; or

2. The component weighs 20 lb (89N) or less or, in the case of a distributed system, 5 lb/ft (73 N/m) or less.

SECTION 110.050.060 - Section R401.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R401.1 Application. The provisions of this chapter shall control the design and construction of the foundation and foundation spaces for buildings. In addition to the provisions of this chapter, the design and construction of foundations in flood hazard areas as established by Table R301.2 shall meet the provisions of Section R322. Wood foundations shall be designed and installed in accordance with AWC PWF.

Exception: The provisions of this chapter shall be permitted to be used for wood foundations only in the following situations:

1. In buildings that have no more than two floors and a roof.

2. When interior basement and foundation walls are constructed at intervals not exceeding 50 feet (15 240 mm).

Wood foundations in Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2 shall not be permitted.

Exception: In non-occupied, single-story, detached storage sheds and similar uses other than carport or garage, provided the gross floor area does not exceed 200 square feet, the plate height does not exceed 12 feet in height above the grade plane at any point, and the maximum roof projection does not exceed 24 inches.

SECTION 110.05.070 - Sections R403.1.2 and R403.1.5 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code are amended to read as follows:

R403.1.2 Continuous footing in Seismic Design Categories D0, D1 and D2. Exterior walls of buildings located in Seismic Design Categories D 0, D 1 and D 2 shall be supported by continuous solid or fully grouted masonry or concrete footings. All required interior braced wall panels in buildings located in Seismic Design Categories D0, D1 and D2 shall be supported on continuous foundations.

R403.1.5 Slope. The top surface of footings shall be level. The bottom surface of footings shall not have a slope exceeding one unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10-percent slope).

Footings shall be stepped where it is necessary to change the elevation of the top surface of the footings or where the slope of the bottom surface of the footings will exceed one unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10-percent slope).

For structures assigned to Seismic Design Categories D0, D1 or D2, stepped footings shall be reinforced with four No. 4 rebar. Two bars shall be place at the top and bottom of the footings as shown in Figure R403.1.5.
517
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 7
FIGURE R403.1.5

STEPPED FOOTING
SECTION 110.05.080 - Section R404.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R404.2 Wood foundation walls. Wood foundation walls shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of Sections R404.2.1 through R404.2.6 and with the details shown in Figures R403.1(2) and R403.1(3). Wood foundation walls shall not be used for structures located in Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2.

SECTION 110.05.090 - Section R501.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R501.2 Application. The provisions of this chapter shall control the design and construction of the floors for buildings, including the floors of attic spaces used to house mechanical or plumbing fixtures and equipment. Mechanical or plumbing fixtures and equipment shall be attached or anchored to the structure in accordance with Section R301.2.2.11. 518
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 8
SECTION 110.05.100 - Section R503.2.4 is added to Chapter 5 of the 20 22 Edition of the California Residential Code to read as follows:

R503.2.4 Openings in horizontal diaphra gms. Openings in horizontal diaphragms with a dimension perpendicular to the joist that is greater than 4 feet (1.2 m) shall be constructed in accordance with Figure R503.2.4.
a. Blockings shall be provided beyond headers.
b. Metal ties not less than 0.058 inch [1.47 mm (16 galvanized gage)] by 1.5 inches (38 mm) wide with eight 16d common nails on each side of the header -joist intersection. The metal ties shall have a minimum yield of 33,000 psi (227 MPa). c. Openings in diaphragms shall be further limited in accordance with Section R301.2.2.6.

FIGURE R503.2.4

OPENINGS IN HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS
519
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 9
SECTION 110.05.110 - Lines 20, 21, 24, and 34 - 37 of Table R602.3(1) of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code are amended to read as follows:

TABLE R602.3(1) FASTENING

SCHEDULE
ITE
M

DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING

ELEMENTS

NUMBER AND TYPE OF
FASTENERa, b, c

SPACING AND

LOCATION
20 k 1" × 6" sheathing to each bearing
3-8d box (21/2" × 0.113"); or
2-8d common (21/2" ×

0.131"); or 2-10d box (3"
× 0.128"); or
2 staples, 1" crown, 16 ga., 13/4" long
Face nail
21 k 1" × 8" and wider sheathing to
each bearing
3-8d box (21/2" × 0.113"); or
3-8d common (21/2" ×

0.131"); or 3-10d box (3"
× 0.128"); or
3 staples, 1" crown, 16 ga., 13/4" long Face nail
Wider than 1" × 8"
4-8d box (21/2" × 0.113"); or
3-8d common (21/2" ×

0.131"); or 3-10d box (3"
× 0.128"); or
4 staples, 1" crown, 16 ga., 13/4" long
Floor
24 k 1" × 6" subfloor or less to each joist
3-8d box (21/2" × 0.113"); or
2-8d common (21/2" ×

0.131"); or 3-10d box (3"
× 0.128"); or
2 staples, 1" crown, 16 ga., 13/4" long
Face nail
Other wall sheathingg
34 k 1/2" structural cellulosic
fiberboard sheathing
11/2" galvanized roofing nail, 7/16"
head diameter, or 11/4" long 16 ga.
staple with 7/16" or 1" crown
3 6
35 k 25/32" structural
cellulosic fiberboard
sheathing
13/4" galvanized roofing nail, 7/16"
head diameter, or 11/2" long 16 ga.
staple with 7/16" or 1" crown
3 6
36 k 1/2" gypsum sheathingd 11/2" galvanized roofing nail; staple galvanized, 11/2" long; 11/4" screws,
Type W or S
7 7
37 k 5/8" gypsum sheathingd 13/4" galvanized roofing nail; staple galvanized, 15/8" long; 15/8" screws,
Type W or S
7 7
For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 mile per hour = 0.447 m/s; 1 ksi = 6.895 MPa. k. Use of staples in braced wall panels shall be prohibited in Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2.
520
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 10
SECTION 110.05.120 – Footnote “b” of Table R602.3(2) of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:
b. Staples shall have a minimum crown width of 7/16-inch on diameter except as noted. Use of staples in braced wall panels shall be prohibited in Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2.

SECTION 110.05.130 - Exception of Section R602.3.2 and Table R602.3.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

Exception: In other than Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2, a single top plate used as an alternative to a double top plate shall comply with the following:

1. The single top plate shall be tied at corners, intersecting walls, and at in-line splices in straight wall lines in accordance with Table R602.3.2.

2. The rafters or joists shall be centered over the studs with a tolerance of not more than 1 inch (25 mm).

3. Omission of the top plate is permitted over headers where the headers are adequately tied to adjacent wall sections in accordance with Table R602.3.2.

SECTION 110.05.140 - Section R602.10.2.3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R602.10.2.3 Minimum number of braced wall panels. Braced wall lines with a length of 16 feet (4877 mm) or less shall have not less than two braced wall panels of any length or one braced wall panel equal to 48 inches (1219 mm) or more. Braced wall lines greater than 16 feet (4877 mm) shall have not less than two braced wall panels. In Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2 no braced wall panel shall a contributing length less than 48 inches in length or as required in Section R602.10.3, whichever is greater. 521
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 11
SECTION 110.05.150 -Table R602.10.3(3) of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:
522
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 12
a. Linear interpolation shall be permitted.
b. Interpolation of bracing length between the Sds values associated with the seismic design categories shall be permitted when a site-specific Sds value is determined in accordance with Section 1613.2 of the California Building Code. c. Where the braced wall line length is greater than 50 feet, braced wall lines shall be permitted to be divided into shorter segments having lengths of 50 feet or less, and the amount of bracing within each segment shall be in accordance with this table. d. Method LIB shall have gypsum board fastened to not less than one side with nails or screws in accordance with Table R602.3(1) for exterior sheathing or Table R702.3.5 for interior gypsum board. Spacing of fasteners at panel edges shall not exceed 8 inches. e. Methods PFG and CS-SFB do not apply in Seismic Design Categories D0, D1 and D2. 523
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 13
f. Methods PFH, PFG and ABW are only permitted on a single story or a first of two stories. g. Where more than one bracing method is used, mixing methods shall be in accordance with Section R602.10.4.1.
h. One- and two- family dwellings in Seismic Design Category D2 exceeding two stories shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. i. Methods GB and PCP braced wall panel h/w ratio shall not exceed 1:1 in SDC D0, D1 and D2. Methods DWB, SFB, PBS, HPS, and CS-SFB are not permitted in D0, D1 and D2.

SECTION 110.05.160 - Table R602.10.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:
524
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 14
525
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 15
SECTION 110.05.170 - Table R602.10.5 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

TABLE R602.10.5

MINIMUM LENGTH OF BRACED WALL PANELS
For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 mile per hour = 0.447 m/s.

NP = Not Permitted.

METHOD
(See Table R602.10.4)
MINIMUM LENGTHa
(inches)

CONTRIBUTING LENGTH
(inches)Wall Height
8 feet 9 feet 10 feet 11 feet 12 feet
DWB, WSP, SFB, PBS, PCP, HPS, BV-WSP 48 48 48 53 58 Actualb GB 48 48 48 53 58 Double sided = Actual
Single sided = 0.5 × Actual
LIB 55 62 69 NP NP Actualb
ABW
SDC A, B and C, ultimate
design
wind speed < 140 mph
28 32 34 38 42
48SDC D0, D1 and D2, ultimate
design
wind speed < 140 mph
32 32 34 NP NP
CS-G 24 27 30 33 36 Actualb

CS-WSP, CS-SFB
Adjacent clear opening height
(inches)
 64 24 27 30 33 36
Actualb
68 26 27 30 33 36
72 27 27 30 33 36
76 30 29 30 33 36
80 32 30 30 33 36
84 35 32 32 33 36
88 38 35 33 33 36
92 43 37 35 35 36
96 48 41 38 36 36
100 — 44 40 38 38
104 — 49 43 40 39
108 — 54 46 43 41
112 — — 50 45 43
116 — — 55 48 45
120 — — 60 52 48
124 — — — 56 51
128 — — — 61 54
132 — — — 66 58
136 — — — — 62
140 — — — — 66
144 — — — — 72
METHOD
(See Table R602.10.4)
Portal header height
8 feet 9 feet 10 feet 11 feet 12 feet
PFH Supporting roof only 16 24 16 24 16 24 Note c Note c 48Supporting one story and roof 24 24 24 Note c Note c PFG 24 27 30 Note d Note d 1.5 × Actualb
CS-PF SDC A, B and C 16 18 20 Note e Note e 1.5 × Actualb SDC D0, D1 and D2 16 24 18 24 20 24 Note e Note e Actualb 526
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 16
a. Linear interpolation shall be permitted.
b. Use the actual length where it is greater than or equal to the minimum length. c. Maximum header height for PFH is 10 feet in accordance with Figure R602.10.6.2, but wall height shall be permitted to be increased to 12 feet with pony wall. d. Maximum header height for PFG is 10 feet in accordance with Figure R602.10.6.3, but wall height shall be permitted to be increased to 12 feet with pony wall. e. Maximum header height for CS-PF is 10 feet in accordance with Figure R602.10.6.4, but wall height shall be permitted to be increased to 12 feet with pony wall.

SECTION 110.05.180 - Figure R602.10.6.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:
527
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 17
SECTION 110.05.190 - Figure R602.10.6.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:
528
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 18
SECTION 110.05.200 - Figure R602.10.6.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

SECTION 110.05.210 - Section R606.4.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R606.4.4 Parapet walls. Unreinforced solid masonry parapet walls shall not be less than 8 inches (203 mm) thick and their height shall not exceed four times their thickness. 529
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 19
Unreinforced hollow unit masonry parapet walls shall be not less than 8 inches (203 mm) thick, and their height shall not exceed three times their thickness. Masonry parapet walls in areas subject to wind loads of 30 pounds per square foot (1.44 kPa) or located in Seismic Design Category D 0, D 1 or D 2, or on townhouses in Seismic Design Category C shall be reinforced in accordance with Section R606.12.

SECTION 110.05.220- Section R606.12.2.2.3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R606.12.2.2.3 Reinforcement requirements for masonry elements. Masonry elements listed in Section R606.12.2.2.2 shall be reinforced in either the horizontal or vertical direction as shown in Figure R606.11(2) and in accordance with the following:

1. Horizontal reinforcement. Horizontal joint reinforcement shall consist of at least one No. 4 bar spaced not more than 48 inches (1219 mm). Horizontal reinforcement shall be provided within 16 inches (406 mm) of the top and bottom of these masonry elements.

2. Vertical reinforcement. Vertical reinforcement shall consist of at least one No. 4 bar spaced not more than 48 inches (1219 mm). Vertical reinforcement shall be within 8 inches (203 mm) of the ends of masonry walls.

SECTION 110.05.230 - Section R803.2.4 is added to Chapter 8 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code to read as follows:

R803.2.4 Openings in horizontal diaphragms. Openings in horizontal diaphragms shall conform with Section R503.2.4.

SECTION 110.05.240 - Section R1001.3.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Residential Code is amended to read as follows:

R1001.3.1 Vertical reinforcing. For chimneys up to 40 inches (1016 mm) wide, four No. 4 continuous vertical bars adequately anchored into the concrete foundation shall be placed between wythes of solid masonry or within the cells of hollow unit masonry and grouted in accordance with Section R606. Grout shall be prevented from bonding with the flue liner so that the flue liner is free to move with thermal expansion. For chimneys more than 40 inches (1016 mm) wide, two additional No. 4 vertical bars adequately anchored into the concrete foundation shall be provided for each additional flue incorporated into the chimney or for each additional 40 inches (1016 mm) in width or fraction thereof.” SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 3. When this Ordinance takes effect, it shall not change any of the provisions of the previous codes and Ordinances or affect any offense, acts done or required to 530
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 20
be done, penalties, forfeitures or punishments incurred, rights or liabilities accrued or claims arising out of the provisions of the previous Ordinances and amendments. Any pending actions shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. Any previous discontinuance, abatement, modification or alteration of any penalty accrued, or to accrue, and the rights or liabilities of any person shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. Wherever there is reference to the California Residential Code, it shall mean the International Residential Code, 2021 Edition, promulgated by the International Code Council (ICC) as amended by the State of California Building Standards.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
531
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 21
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
532
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 22

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
533
ORDINANCE NO.23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.12 (MECHANICAL CODE) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 4)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Chapter 110.12 (Mechanical Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.12

MECHANICAL CODE
SECTION 110.12.010 Adoption by Reference of California Mechanical Code. That certain document, one copy of which is on file in Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk, entitled "California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition," published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (“IAPMO”), Contained in chapter 2-17 as adopted by the California building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4) is hereby adopted by reference in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the California Government Code, as part of this Chapter.”
SECTION 2 CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 3.That when this Ordinance takes effect, it shall not change any of the provisions of the previous codes and Ordinances or affect any offense, acts done or required to be done, penalties, forfeitures or punishments incurred, rights or liabilities accrued or claims arising out of the provisions of the previous Ordinances and amendments. Any pending actions shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. Any previous discontinuance, abatement, or liabilities of any person shall not be affected by the enactment of this ordinance. 534
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. That wherever there is reference to the California Mechanical Code, it shall mean the 2021 Mechanical Code promulgated by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (“IAPMO”) as amended by the State of California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
535
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
536
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
537
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.09 (ENERGY CODE) OF THE EASTVALE
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 6)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 110.09 (Energy Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.09

ENERGY CODE
SECTION 110.09.010 Adoption by Reference of California Energy Code. Those portions of that certain document, one copy of which is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk entitled California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, identified as the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, published by the California Building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) is hereby adopted by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the Government Code one copy of which is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk.” SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 538
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2
SECTION 4. That if any portion or portions of this Ordinance are held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be considered as separate and independent and the Council declares that the legality of the remaining portions shall not change as a result of the court's findings.

SECTION 5. That wherever there is reference to the California Energy Code, it shall mean the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, as published by the State of California Building Standards Commission, effective January 1, 2023.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
539
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
540
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
541
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.06 (GREEN BUILDING CODE) OF THE

EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 11)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 110.06 (Green Building Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.06

GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
SECTION 110.06.010 Adoption by Reference of California Green Building Standards Code. Those certain documents, one copy each, are on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk entitled "California Green Building Standards Code”, published by the California Building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11) and everything contained therein is hereby adopted by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the Government Code, as a part of this Chapter.” SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 5. Wherever there is reference to the California Green Building Standards Code, it shall mean the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
543
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
545
ORDINANCE NO. 23-23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.08 (ELECTRICAL CODE) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 3)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Chapter 110.08 (Electrical Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.08

ELECTRICAL CODE
SECTION 110.08.010 Adoption by Reference of California Electrical Code. Those portions of that certain document, one copy of which is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk entitled “California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition," published by the California Building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 3) and identified as NFPA 70-2020, published by the National Fire Protection Association contained in Chapters 1 to 9 as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission, and Annex B and C, are hereby adopted by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the Government Code, as a part of this Chapter.”
SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 3. That when this Ordinance takes effect, it shall not change any of the provisions of the previous codes and Ordinances or affect any offense, acts done or required to be done, penalties, forfeitures or punishments incurred, rights or liabilities accrued or claims arising out of the provisions of the previous Ordinances and amendments. Any pending actions shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. Any previous discontinuance, abatement, or liabilities of any person shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. 546
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. That wherever there is reference to the California Electrical Code, it shall mean the 2020 Edition of the National Electrical Code promulgated by the National Fire Protection Association as amended by the State of California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
547
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
548
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 22-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
549
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.17 (REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE) OF

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE
(CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 12)
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 110.17 (Referenced Standards Code) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.17

REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE
SECTION 110.17.010 Adoption by Reference of California Referenced Standards Code .

Those certain documents, one copy each, are on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk entitled " Referenced Standard Code”, published by the California Building Standards Commission, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 12) and everything contained therein is hereby adopted by reference, in accordance with Section 50022.2 of the Government Code, as a part of this Chapter.” SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit.

SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5: Wherever there is reference to the California Referenced Standard Code, it shall mean the California Referenced Standard Building Code, 2022 Edition, promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission.

SECTION 6.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
551
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)§

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14 of December 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11 of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
553
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AMENDING CHAPTER 110.04 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 2) AND MAKING LOCAL AMENDMENTS THERETO
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and, WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.5, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that a city or county may make such changes or modifications to the requirements contained in the California Building Standards Code which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and, WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that prior to making any change or modification to the California Building Standards Code authorized by the Health & Safety Code, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is required to make an express finding that such modifications or changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards Code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is in a liquefaction zone; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is in Climate Zone 11 and, therefore, is required to have more stringent energy efficiency requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is subject to ground tremors from large seismic events along, but not limited to, the San Andreas Fault.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Findings. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the 2022 California Building Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geologic of topographic conditions, and adopts the findings provided below to support the modifications to the 2022 California Building Code. The City Council further finds that some changes and modifications are of an administrative or procedural nature or concern themselves with subjects not covered by the code or are reasonably necessary to safeguard life and property within the City. The City Council hereby adopts the following (Climatic, geological, and topographical, where applicable) findings to support the proposed amendments to the 2022 California Building Code made in this Ordinance:

PAGE 2
same months humidity is usually less than 40%, and humidity measurements less than 10% are not uncommon. These conditions contribute to an increased likelihood of fire. Frequent periods of drought and low humidity add to the fire danger. This predisposes the area to large destructive fires (conflagration). In addition to directly damaging or destroying buildings, these fires are also prone to disrupt utility services throughout the City. .

Fire sprinkler systems will also reduce the use of water for firefighting by as much as 50 to 75 percent.

Additional fire protection is also justified to match the current resources of firefighting equipment and personnel within the fire department.

III. Geological Conditions
555
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 3
A. The City of Eastvale is located in Southern California, in an extremely active seismic region, with high levels of historic earthquake shaking in the recent past (earthquakes measuring larger than a magnitude 5 on the Richter Scale) and can be expected to experience significant strong ground shaking within the foreseeable future.

Improved standards are necessary to ensure that maximum safety is provided to persons and property.

PAGE 4
IV. The findings above are applicable to the Amendments to the 2022 California Building Code as follows:
2022 CBC Section
Amended TITLE/DESCRIPTION Findings l,
ll, lll
1613.5 and 1613.5.1 Add CBC Sections 1613.5 and 1613.5.1 Amendments to ASCE 7 lll 1613.5.2 Add CBC Section 1613.5.2 Wood Diaphragms lll
1613.5.3 Add CBC Section 1613.5.3 Structural Separation lll 1613.6 Add CBC Section 1613.6 Seismic Design Provisions for Hillside Buildings lll 1613.7 Add CBC Section 1613.7 Suspended Ceilings lll
1704.6 Amend CBC Section 1704.6 Structural Observations lll 1704.6.1 Amend CBC Section 1704.6.1 Structural Observations for Seismic Resistance lll
1705.3 Amend CBC Section 1705.3 Concrete Construction lll 1705.13 Amend CBC Section 1705.13 Special Inspections for Seismic Resistance lll 1807.1.4 Amend CBC Section 1807.1.4 Permanent Wood Foundation System lll 1807.1.6 Amend CBC Section 1807.1.6 Prescriptive Design of Concrete and Masonry Foundation Walls lll
1807.2 Amend CBC Section 1807.2 Retaining Walls lll
1807.3.1 Amend CBC Section 1807.3.1 Limitations lll
1809.3 Amend CBC Section 1809.3 Stepped Footings lll
1809.7 and Table
1809.7
Amend CBC Section 1809.7 and Table 1809.7 Prescriptive Footings for Light-Frame Construction lll
1809.12 Amend CBC Section 1809.12 Timber Footings lll
1810.3.2.4 Amend CBC Section 1810.3.2.4 Timber lll
1905.1.7 Amend CBC Section 1905.1.7 ACI 318, Section 14.1.4 lll 1905.1 Amend CBC Section 1905.1 and Add Sections 1905.1.9 thru 1905.1.11 General lll
2304.10.2 Amend CBC Section 2304.10.2 Fastener Requirement lll 2304.10.3.1 Add CBC Section 2304.10.3.1 Quality of Nails lll 2304.12.8 Amend CBC Section 2304.12.8 Wood Used in Retaining Walls and Cribs lll 2305.4 Add CBC Section 2305.4 Hold-down Connectors lll
2306.2 Amend CBC Section 2306.2 Wood-Frame Diaphragms lll 2306.3 Amend CBC Section 2306.3 Wood-Frame Shear Walls lll 2307.2 Add CBC Section 2307.2 Wood-Frame Shear Walls lll 2308.6.1 Amend CBC Table 2308.6.1 Wall Bracing Requirements lll 2308.6.5, 2308.6.5.1
and 2308.6.5.2 and
Figures 2308.6.5.1
and 2308.6.5.2
Amend CBC Sections 2308.6.5.1 and 2308.6.5.2, and Figures 2308.6.5.1 and 2308.6.5.2 Alternative Bracing lll
2308.6.8.1 Amend CBC Section 2308.6.8.1 Foundation Requirements lll 2308.6.9 Amend CBC Section 2308.6.9 Attachment of Sheathing lll 3115 Amend CBC Section 3115 Intermodal Shipping Containers lll SECTION 2. Chapter 110.04 (“Building Code”) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
557
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 5
“CHAPTER 110.04

BUILDING CODE
SECTION 110.04.010 – Adoption by Reference of California Building Code. Except as provided herein, Chapters 2-35 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code, (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2), based upon the 2021 International Building Code are hereby adopted by reference as fully set forth herein, and shall constitute and is hereby established as the “Eastvale Building Code”. A copy of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is on file in the Building and Safety Division and the Office of the City Clerk for use and examination by the public.

SECTION 110.04.020 – Sections 1613.5 and 1613.5.1 are added to Chapter 16 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1613.5 Amendments to ASCE 7. The provisions of Section 1613.5 shall be permitted as an amendment to the relevant provisions of ASCE 7.
1613.5.1 Values for vertical combinations.Modify ASCE 7 Section 12.2.3.1 Exception 3 as follows:

3. Detached one- and two-family dwellings up to two stories in height of light frame construction.

SECTION 110.04.030 – Section 1613.5.2 is added to Chapter 16 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1613.5.2 Wood diaphragms. Modify ASCE 7 Section 12.11.2.2.3 as follows:

12.11.2.2.3 Wood diaphragms. The anchorage of concrete or masonry structural walls to wood diaphragms shall be in accordance with AWC SDPWS 4.1.5.1 and this section.

Continuous ties required by this section shall be in addition to the diaphragm sheathing.

Anchorage shall not be accomplished by use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal, nor shall wood ledgers or framing be used in cross-grain bending or cross-grain tension. The diaphragm sheathing shall not be considered effective for providing the ties or struts required by this section
For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F, wood diaphragms supporting concrete or masonry walls shall comply with the following:

1. The spacing of continuous ties shall not exceed 40 feet. Added chords of diaphragms may be used to form subdiaphragms to transmit the anchorage forces to the main continuous crossties.

2. The maximum diaphragm shear used to determine the depth of the subdiaphragm shall not exceed 75% of the maximum diaphragm shear.

SECTION 110.04.040 – Section 1613.5.3 is added to Chapter 16 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1613.5.3 Structural separation.Modify ASCE 7 Section 12.12.3 Equation 12.12-1 as follows:
(12.12-1)
e
maxd
M
I
C 
558
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 6
SECTION 110.04.050 – Section 1613.6 is added to Chapter 16 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1613.6 Seismic design provisions for hillside buildings. 1613.6.1 Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum regulations for the design and construction of new buildings and additions to existing buildings when constructing such buildings on or into slopes steeper than one unit vertical in three units horizontal (33.3%). These regulations establish minimum standards for seismic force resistance to reduce the risk of injury or loss of life in the event of earthquakes.
1613.6.2 Scope. The provisions of this section shall apply to the design of the lateral-force-resisting system for hillside buildings at and below the base level diaphragm. The design of the lateral-force- resisting system above the base level diaphragm shall be in accordance with the provisions for seismic and wind design as required elsewhere in this division.

Exception: Non-habitable accessory buildings and decks not supporting or supported from the main building are exempt from these regulations.
1613.6.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this section certain terms are defined as follows:

BASE LEVEL DIAPHRAGM is the floor at, or closest to, the top of the highest level of the foundation.

DIAPHRAGM ANCHORS are assemblies that connect a diaphragm to the adjacent foundation at the uphill diaphragm edge.

DOWNHILL DIRECTION is the descending direction of the slope approximately perpendicular to the slope contours.

FOUNDATION is concrete or masonry which supports a building, including footings, stem walls, retaining walls, and grade beams.

FOUNDATION EXTENDING IN THE DOWNHILL DIRECTION is a foundation running downhill and approximately perpendicular to the uphill foundation.

HILLSIDE BUILDING is any building or portion thereof constructed on or into a slope steeper than one unit vertical in three units horizontal (33.3%). If only a portion of the building is supported on or into the slope, these regulations apply to the entire building.

PRIMARY ANCHORS are diaphragm anchors designed for and providing a direct connection as described in Sections 1613.6.5 and 1613.6.7.3 between the diaphragm and the uphill foundation.

SECONDARY ANCHORS are diaphragm anchors designed for and providing a redundant diaphragm to foundation connection, as described in Sections 1613.6.6 and 1613.6.7.4.

UPHILL DIAPHRAGM EDGE is the edge of the diaphragm adjacent and closest to the highest ground level at the perimeter of the diaphragm.

UPHILL FOUNDATION is the foundation parallel and closest to the uphill diaphragm edge. 1613.6.4 Analysis and design.
1613.6.4.1 General. Every hillside building within the scope of this section shall be analyzed, designed, and constructed in accordance with the provisions of this division. When the code-prescribed wind design produces greater effects, the wind design shall govern, but detailing requirements and limitations prescribed in this and referenced sections shall be followed. 559
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 7
1613.6.4.2 Base level diaphragm-downhill direction. The following provisions shall apply to the seismic analysis and design of the connections for the base level diaphragm in the downhill direction. 1613.6.4.2.1 Base for lateral force design defined.For seismic forces acting in the downhill direction, the base of the building shall be the floor at or closest to the top of the highest level of the foundation. 1613.6.4.2.2 Base shear. In developing the base shear for seismic design, the response modification coefficient (R) shall not exceed 5 for bearing wall and building frame systems. The total base shear shall include the forces tributary to the base level diaphragm including forces from the base level diaphragm.
1613.6.5 Base shear resistance-primary anchors.
1613.6.5.1 General. The base shear in the downhill direction shall be resisted through primary anchors from diaphragm struts provided in the base level diaphragm to the foundation. 1613.6.5.2 Location of primary anchors. A primary anchor and diaphragm strut shall be provided in line with each foundation extending in the downhill direction. Primary anchors and diaphragm struts shall also be provided where interior vertical lateral-force-resisting elements occur above and in contact with the base level diaphragm. The spacing of primary anchors and diaphragm struts or collectors shall in no case exceed 30 feet (9144 mm).
1613.6.5.3 Design of primary anchors and diaphragm struts.Primary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be designed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1613.6.8. 1613.6.5.4 Limitations. The following lateral-force-resisting elements shall not be designed to resist seismic forces below the base level diaphragm in the downhill direction:

1. Wood structural panel wall sheathing,

2. Cement plaster and lath,

3. Gypsum wallboard, and

4. Tension only braced frames.

Braced frames designed in accordance with the requirements of Section 2205.2.1.2 may be used to transfer forces from the primary anchors and diaphragm struts to the foundation provided lateral forces do not induce flexural stresses in any member of the frame or in the diaphragm struts. Deflections of frames shall account for the variation in slope of diagonal members when the frame is not rectangular. 1613.6.6 Base shear resistance-secondary anchors.
1613.6.6.1 General. In addition to the primary anchors required by Section 1613.6.5, the base shear in the downhill direction shall be resisted through secondary anchors in the uphill foundation connected to diaphragm struts in the base level diaphragm.

Exception: Secondary anchors are not required where foundations extending in the downhill direction spaced at not more than 30 feet (9144 mm) on center extend up to and are directly connected to the base level diaphragm for at least 70% of the diaphragm depth. 1613.6.6.2 Secondary anchor capacity and spacing. Secondary anchors at the base level diaphragm shall be designed for a minimum force equal to the base shear, including forces tributary to the base level diaphragm, but not less than 600 pounds per lineal foot (8.76 kN/m) based on Allowable Stress Design (ASD) levels. The secondary anchors shall be uniformly distributed along the uphill diaphragm edge and shall be spaced a maximum of 4 feet (1219 mm) on center. 1613.6.6.3 Design. Secondary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be designed in accordance with Section 1613.6.8.
560
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 8
1613.6.7 Diaphragms below the base level-downhill direction. The following provisions shall apply to the lateral analysis and design of the connections for all diaphragms below the base level diaphragm in the downhill direction.
1613.6.7.1 Diaphragm defined. Every floor level below the base level diaphragm shall be designed as a diaphragm.
1613.6.7.2 Design force. Each diaphragm below the base level diaphragm shall be designed for all tributary loads at that level using a minimum seismic force factor not less than the base shear coefficient.
1613.6.7.3 Design force resistance-primary anchors. The design force described in Section 1613.6.7.2 shall be resisted through primary anchors from diaphragm struts provided in each diaphragm to the foundation. Primary anchors shall be provided and designed in accordance with the requirements and limitations of Section 1613.6.5.
1613.6.7.4 Design force resistance-secondary anchors.
1613.6.7.4.1 General. In addition to the primary anchors required in Section 1613.6.7.3, the design force in the downhill direction shall be resisted through secondary anchors in the uphill foundation connected to diaphragm struts in each diaphragm below the base level.

Exception: Secondary anchors are not required where foundations extending in the downhill direction, spaced at not more than 30 feet (9144 mm) on center, extend up to and are directly connected to each diaphragm below the base level for at least 70% of the diaphragm depth. 1613.6.7.4.2 Secondary anchor capacity. Secondary anchors at each diaphragm below the base level diaphragm shall be designed for a minimum force equal to the design force but not less than 300 pounds per lineal foot (4.38 kN/m) based on Allowable Stress Design (ASD) levels. The secondary anchors shall be uniformly distributed along the uphill diaphragm edge and shall be spaced a maximum of 4 feet (1219 mm) on center.
1613.6.7.4.3 Design. Secondary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be designed in accordance with Section 1613.6.8.
1613.6.8 Primary and secondary anchorage and diaphragm strut design. Primary and secondary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be designed in accordance with the following provisions:

1. Fasteners. All bolted fasteners used to develop connections to wood members shall be provided with square plate washers at all bolt heads and nuts. Washers shall be minimum 0.229 inch by 3 inches by 3 inches (5.82 mm by 76 mm by 76 mm) in size. Nuts shall be tightened to finger tight plus one half (1/2) wrench turn prior to covering the framing.

2. Fastening. The diaphragm to foundation anchorage shall not be accomplished by the use of toenailing, nails subject to withdrawal, or wood in cross-grain bending or cross-grain tension.

3. Size of Wood Members. Wood diaphragm struts collectors, and other wood members connected to primary anchors shall not be less than 3 inch (76 mm) nominal width. The effects of eccentricity on wood members shall be evaluated as required per Item 9.

4. Design. Primary and secondary anchorage, including diaphragm struts, splices, and collectors shall be designed for 125% of the tributary force.

5. Allowable Stress Increase. The one-third allowable stress increase permitted under Section 1605.3.2 shall not be taken when the working (allowable) stress design method is used. 561
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 9

6. Steel Element of Structural Wall Anchorage System. The strength design forces for steel elements of the structural wall anchorage system, with the exception of anchor bolts and reinforcing steel, shall be increased by 1.4 times the forces otherwise required.

7. Primary Anchors. The load path for primary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be fully developed into the diaphragm and into the foundation. The foundation must be shown to be adequate to resist the concentrated loads from the primary anchors.

8. Secondary Anchors. The load path for secondary anchors and diaphragm struts shall be fully developed in the diaphragm but need not be developed beyond the connection to the foundation.

9. Symmetry. All lateral force foundation anchorage and diaphragm strut connections shall be symmetrical. Eccentric connections may be permitted when demonstrated by calculation or tests that all components of force have been provided for in the structural analysis or tests.

10. Wood Ledgers. Wood ledgers shall not be used to resist cross-grain bending or cross-grain tension. 1613.6.9 Lateral-force-resisting elements normal to the downhill direction. 1613.6.9.1 General. In the direction normal to the downhill direction, lateral-force-resisting elements shall be designed in accordance with the requirements of this section. 1613.6.9.2 Base shear. In developing the base shear for seismic design, the response modification coefficient (R) shall not exceed 5 for bearing wall and building frame systems. 1613.6.9.3 Vertical distribution of seismic forces. For seismic forces acting normal to the downhill direction the distribution of seismic forces over the height of the building using Section 12.8.3 of ASCE 7 shall be determined using the height measured from the top of the lowest level of the building foundation.
1613.6.9.4 Drift limitations. The story drift below the base level diaphragm shall not exceed 0.007 times the story height at strength design force level. The total drift from the base level diaphragm to the top of the foundation shall not exceed 3/4 inch (19 mm). Where the story height or the height from the base level diaphragm to the top of the foundation varies because of a stepped footing or story offset, the height shall be measured from the average height of the top of the foundation. The story drift shall not be reduced by the effect of horizontal diaphragm stiffness. 1613.6.9.5 Distribution of lateral forces.
1613.6.9.5.1 General. The design lateral force shall be distributed to lateral-force-resisting elements of varying heights in accordance with the stiffness of each individual element. 1613.6.9.5.2 Wood structural panel sheathed walls.The stiffness of a stepped wood structural panel shear wall may be determined by dividing the wall into adjacent rectangular elements, subject to the same top of wall deflection. Deflections of shear walls may be estimated by AWC SDPWS Section

4.3.2. Sheathing and fastening requirements for the stiffest section shall be used for the entire wall.

Each section of wall shall be anchored for shear and uplift at each step. The minimum horizontal length of a step shall be 8 feet (2438 mm) and the maximum vertical height of a step shall be 2 feet 8 inches (813 mm).
1613.6.9.5.3 Reinforced concrete or masonry shear walls. Reinforced concrete or masonry shear walls shall have forces distributed in proportion to the rigidity of each section of the wall. 1613.6.9.6 Limitations. The following lateral force-resisting-elements shall not be designed to resist lateral forces below the base level diaphragm in the direction normal to the downhill direction:

1. Cement plaster and lath,

2. Gypsum wallboard, and
562
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 10

3. Tension-only braced frames.

Braced frames designed in accordance with the requirements of Section 2205.2.1.2 of this Code may be designed as lateral-force-resisting elements in the direction normal to the downhill direction, provided lateral forces do not induce flexural stresses in any member of the frame. Deflections of frames shall account for the variation in slope of diagonal members when the frame is not rectangular. 1613.6.10 Specific design provisions.
1613.6.10.1 Footings and grade beams.All footings and grade beams shall comply with the following:

1. Grade beams shall extend at least 12 inches (305 mm) below the lowest adjacent grade and provide a minimum 24 inch (610 mm) distance horizontally from the bottom outside face of the grade beam to the face of the descending slope.

2. Continuous footings shall be reinforced with at least two No. 4 reinforcing bars at the top and two No. 4 reinforcing bars at the bottom.

3. All main footing and grade beam reinforcement steel shall be bent into the intersecting footing and fully developed around each corner and intersection.

4. All concrete stem walls shall extend from the foundation and reinforced as required for concrete or masonry walls.
1613.6.10.2 Protection against decay and termites. All wood to earth separation shall comply with the following:

1. Where a footing or grade beam extends across a descending slope, the stem wall, grade beam, or footing shall extend up to a minimum 18 inches (457 mm) above the highest adjacent grade.

Exception: At paved garage and doorway entrances to the building, the stem wall need only extend to the finished concrete slab, provided the wood framing is protected with a moisture proof barrier.

2. Wood ledgers supporting a vertical load of more than 100 pounds per lineal foot (1.46 kN/m) based on Allowable Stress Design (ASD) levels and located within 48 inches (1219 mm) of adjacent grade are prohibited. Galvanized steel ledgers and anchor bolts, with or without wood nailers, or treated or decay resistant sill plates supported on a concrete or masonry seat, may be used. 1613.6.10.3 Sill plates. All sill plates and anchorage shall comply with the following:

1. All wood framed walls, including nonbearing walls, when resting on a footing, foundation, or grade beam stem wall, shall be supported on wood sill plates bearing on a level surface.

2. Power-driven fasteners shall not be used to anchor sill plates except at interior nonbearing walls not designed as shear walls.
1613.6.10.4 Column base plate anchorage. The base of isolated wood posts (not framed into a stud wall) supporting a vertical load of 4,000 pounds (17.8 kN) based on Allowable Stress Design (ASD) levels or more and the base plate for a steel column shall comply with the following:

1. When the post or column is supported on a pedestal extending above the top of a footing or grade beam, the pedestal shall be designed and reinforced as required for concrete or masonry columns.

The pedestal shall be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 bars extending to the bottom of the footing or grade beam. The top of exterior pedestals shall be sloped for positive drainage.

2. The base plate anchor bolts or the embedded portion of the post base, and the vertical reinforcing bars for the pedestal, shall be confined with two No. 4 or three No. 3 ties within the top 5 inches (127 mm) of the concrete or masonry pedestal. The base plate anchor bolts shall be embedded a 563
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 11
minimum of 20 bolt diameters into the concrete or masonry pedestal. The base plate anchor bolts and post bases shall be galvanized and each anchor bolt shall have at least 2 galvanized nuts above the base plate.
1613.6.10.5 Steel beam to column supports. All steel beam to column supports shall be positively braced in each direction. Steel beams shall have stiffener plates installed on each side of the beam web at the column. The stiffener plates shall be welded to each beam flange and the beam web. Each brace connection or structural member shall consist of at least two 5/8 inch (15.9 mm) diameter machine bolts.

SECTION 110.04.060 – Section 1613.7 is added to Chapter 16 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1613.7 Suspended ceilings. Minimum design and installation standards for suspended ceilings shall be determined in accordance with the requirements of Section 2506.2.1 of this Code and this section. 1613.7.1 Scope. This part contains special requirements for suspended ceilings and lighting systems.

Provisions of Section 13.5.6 of ASCE 7 shall apply except as modified herein. 1613.7.2 General. The suspended ceilings and lighting systems shall be limited to 6 feet (1828 mm) below the structural deck unless the lateral bracing is designed by a licensed engineer or architect. 1613.7.3 Sprinkler heads. All sprinkler heads (drops) except fire-resistance-rated floor/ceiling or roof/ceiling assemblies, shall be designed to allow for free movement of the sprinkler pipes with oversize rings, sleeves or adaptors through the ceiling tile. Sprinkler heads and other penetrations shall have a 2 inch (50mm) oversize ring, sleeve, or adapter through the ceiling tile to allow for free movement of at least 1 inch (25mm) in all horizontal directions. Alternatively, a swing joint that can accommodate 1 inch (25 mm) of ceiling movement in all horizontal directions is permitted to be provided at the top of the sprinkler head extension.

Sprinkler heads penetrating fire-resistance-rated floor/ceiling or roof/ceiling assemblies shall comply with Section 714 of this Code.
1613.7.4 Special requirements for means of egress. Suspended ceiling assemblies located along means of egress serving an occupant load of 30 or more and at lobbies accessory to Group A Occupancies shall comply with the following provisions. 1613.7.4.1 General. Ceiling suspension systems shall be connected and braced with vertical hangers attached directly to the structural deck along the means of egress serving an occupant load of 30 or more and at lobbies’ accessory to Group A Occupancies. Spacing of vertical hangers shall not exceed 2 feet (610 mm) on center along the entire length of the suspended ceiling assembly located along the means of egress or at the lobby.
1613.7.4.2 Assembly device. All lay-in panels shall be secured to the suspension ceiling assembly with two hold-down clips minimum for each tile within a 4-foot (1219 mm) radius of the exit lights and exit signs.
1613.7.4.3 Emergency systems. Independent supports and braces shall be provided for light fixtures required for exit illumination. Power supply for exit illumination shall comply with the requirements of Section 1008.3 of this Code.
1613.7.4.4 Supports for appendage. Separate support from the structural deck shall be provided for all appendages such as light fixtures, air diffusers, exit signs, and similar elements.

SECTION 110.04.070 – Section 1704.6 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
564
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 12
1704.6 Structural observations. Where required by the provisions of Section 1704.6.1, the owner or the owner’s authorized agent shall employ a structural observer to perform structural observations. The structural observer shall visually observe representative locations of structural systems, details and load paths for general conformance to the approved construction documents. Structural observation does not include or waive the responsibility for the inspections in Section 110 or the special inspections in Section 1705 or other sections of this code. The structural observer shall be one of the following individuals:

1. The registered design professional responsible for the structural design, or

2. A registered design professional designated by the registered design professional responsible for the structural design.

Prior to the commencement of observations, the structural observer shall submit to the building official a written statement identifying the frequency and extent of structural observations.

The owner or owner’s authorized agent shall coordinate and call a preconstruction meeting between the structural observer, contractors, affected subcontractors and special inspectors. The structural observer shall preside over the meeting. The purpose of the meeting shall be to identify the major structural elements and connections that affect the vertical and lateral load resisting systems of the structure and to review scheduling of the required observations. A record of the meeting shall be included in the report submitted to the building official.

Observed deficiencies shall be reported in writing to the owner or owner’s authorized agent, special inspector, contractor and the building official. Upon the form prescribed by the building official, the structural observer shall submit to the building official a written statement at each significant construction stage stating that the site visits have been made and identifying any reported deficiencies which, to the best of the structural observer’s knowledge, have not been resolved. A final report by the structural observer which states that all observed deficiencies have been resolved is required before acceptance of the work by the building official.

SECTION 110.04.080 – Section 1704.6.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1704.6.1 Structural observations for seismic resistance. Structural observations shall be provided for those structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F where one or more of the following conditions exist:

1. The structure is classified as Risk Category III or IV.

1. The structure is a high-rise building.

3. A lateral design is required for the structure or portion thereof.

Exception: One-story wood framed Group R-3 and Group U Occupancies less than 2,000 square feet in area, provided the adjacent grade is not steeper than 1 unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10% sloped), assigned to Seismic Design Category D.

4. Such observation is required by the registered design professional responsible for the structural design.

5. Such observation is specifically required by the building official.

SECTION 110.04.090 – Section 1705.3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:

Exceptions: Special inspections and tests shall not be required for:
565
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 13

1. Isolated spread concrete footings of buildings three stories or less above grade plane that are fully supported on earth or rock where the structural design of the footing is based on a specified compressive strength, f’c, not more than 2,500 pounds per square inch (psi) (17.2 Mpa) regardless of the compressive strength specified in the construction documents or used in the footing construction.

2. Continuous concrete footings supporting walls of buildings three stories or less above grade plane that are fully supported on earth or rock where:

2.1. The footings support walls of light-frame construction;

2.2. The footings are designed in accordance with Table 1809.7; or

2.3.The structural design of the footing is based on a specified compressive strength, f’c, not more than 2,500 pounds per square inch (psi) (17.2 Mpa), regardless of the compressive strength specified in the construction documents or used in the footing construction.

3. Nonstructural concrete slabs supported directly on the ground, including prestressed slabs on grade, where the effective prestress in the concrete is less than 150 psi (1.03 Mpa).

4. Concrete patios, driveways and sidewalks, on grade
SECTION 110.04.100 – Section 1705.13 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1705.13 Special inspections for seismic resistance. Special inspections for seismic resistance shall be required as specified in Sections 1705.13.1 through 1705.13.9, unless exempted by the exceptions of Section 1704.2.

Exception: The special inspections specified in Sections 1705.13.1 through 1705.13.9 are not required for structures designed and constructed in accordance with one of the following:

1. The structure consists of light-frame construction; the design spectral response acceleration at short periods, SDS, as determined in Section 1613.2.4, does not exceed 0.5; and the building height of the structure does not exceed 35 feet (10 668 mm).

2. The seismic force-resisting system of the structure consists of reinforced masonry or reinforced concrete; the design spectral response acceleration at short periods, SDS, as determined in Section 1613.2.4, does not exceed 0.5; and the building height of the structure does not exceed 25 feet (7620 mm)

3. The structure is a detached one- or two-family dwelling not exceeding two stories above grade plane, is not assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F, and does not have any of the following horizontal or vertical irregularities in accordance with Section 12.3 of ASCE 7:

3.1 Torsional or extreme torsional irregularity.

3.2 Nonparallel systems irregularity.

3.3 Stiffness-soft story or stiffness-extreme soft story irregularity.

3.4 Discontinuity in lateral strength-weak story irregularity.

SECTION 110.04.110 – Section 1807.1.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1807.1.4 Permanent wood foundation systems. Permanent wood foundation systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with AWC PWF. Lumber and plywood shall be treated in accordance with AWPA U1 (Commodity Specification A, Special Requirement 4.2) and shall be 566
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 14
identified in accordance with Section 2303.1.9.1. Permanent wood foundation systems shall not be used for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

SECTION 110.04.120 – Section 1807.1.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1807.1.6 Prescriptive design of concrete and masonry foundation walls. Concrete and masonry foundation walls that are laterally supported at the top and bottom shall be permitted to be designed and constructed in accordance with this section. Prescriptive design of foundation walls shall not be used for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

SECTION 110.04.130 – Section 1807.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1807.2 Retaining walls. Retaining walls shall be designed in accordance with Section 1807.2.1 through 1807.2.3. Retaining walls assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F shall not be partially or wholly constructed of wood.

SECTION 110.04.140 – Section 1807.3.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1807.3.1 Limitations. The design procedures outlined in this section are subject to the following limitations:

1. The frictional resistance for structural walls and slabs on silts and clays shall be limited to one-half of the normal force imposed on the soils by the weight of the footing or slab.

2. Posts embedded in earth shall not be used to provide lateral support for structural or nonstructural materials such as plaster, masonry or concrete unless bracing is provided that develops the limited deflection required.

Wood poles shall be treated in accordance with AWPA U1 for sawn timber posts (Commodity Specification A, Use Category 4B) and for round timber posts (Commodity Specification B, Use Category 4B). Wood poles and posts embedded in direct contact with soil shall not be used for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

Exception: Wood poles and posts embedded in direct contact with soil may be used to support nonhabitable, nonoccupiable structures such as fences when approved by the building official.

SECTION 110.04.150 – Section 1809.3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1809.3 Stepped footings. The top surface of footings shall be level. The bottom surface of footings shall be permitted to have a slope not exceeding one unit vertical in 10 unit’s horizontal (10-percent slope). Footings shall be stepped where it is necessary to change the elevation of the top surface of the footing or where the surface of the ground slopes more than one unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10-percent slope).

For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F, the stepping requirement shall also apply to the top surface of continuous footings supporting walls. Footings shall be reinforced with four No. 4 deformed reinforcing bars. Two bars shall be placed at the top and bottom of the footings as shown in Figure 1809.3.
567
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 15
FIGURE 1809.3

STEPPED FOOTING
SECTION 110.04.160 – Section 1809.7 and Table 1809.7 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code are amended to read as follows:
1809.7 Prescriptive footings for light-frame construction. Where a specific design is not provided, concrete or masonry-unit footings supporting walls of light-frame construction shall be permitted to be designed in accordance with Table 1809.7. Light-frame construction using prescriptive footings in Table 1809.7 shall not exceed one story above grade plane for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

TABLE 1809.7

PRESCRIPTIVE FOOTINGS SUPPORTING WALLS OF
LIGHT-FRAME CONSTRUCTION a, b, c, d, e

NUMBER OF FLOORS SUPPORTED
BY THE FOOTING f

WIDTH OF FOOTING
(inches)

THICKNESS OF
FOOTING (inches)
1 12 6
2 15 6
3 18 8 g
For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm
a. Depth of footings shall be in accordance with Section 1809.4. b. The ground under the floor shall be permitted to be excavated to the elevation of the top of the footing. c. See Section 1905 for additional requirements for concrete footings of structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.
d. For thickness of foundation walls, see Section 1807.1.6. e. Footings shall be permitted to support a roof addition to the stipulated number of floors. Footings supporting roof only shall be as required for supporting one floor.

SECTION 110.04.170 – Section 1809.12 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1809.12 Timber footings. Timber footings shall be permitted for buildings of Type V construction and as otherwise approved by the Building Official. Such footings shall be treated in accordance with AWPA U1 (Commodity Specification A, Use Category 4B). Treated timbers are not required where placed entirely below permanent water level, or where used as capping for wood piles that project above the water level over submerged or marsh lands. The compressive stresses perpendicular to grain in untreated timber footings supported on treated piles shall not exceed 70 percent of the allowable stresses for the species and grade of timber as specified in the ANSI/AWC NDS. Timber footings shall not be used in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F. 568
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 16
SECTION 110.04.180 – Section 1810.3.2.4 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1810.3.2.4 Timber. Timber deep foundation elements shall be designed as piles or poles in accordance with ANSI/AWC NDS. Round timber elements shall conform to ASTM D 25. Sawn timber elements shall conform to DOC PS-20. Timber deep foundation elements shall not be used in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

SECTION 110.04.190 – Section 1905.1.7 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
1905.1.7 ACI 318, Section 14.1.4. Delete ACI 318, Section 14.1.4, and replace with the following:

14.1.4 – Plain concrete in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F.

14.1.4.1 – Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F shall not have elements of structural plain concrete, except as follows:
(a) Concrete used for fill with a minimum cement content of two (2) sacks of Portland cement or cementious material per cubic yard.
(b) Isolated footings of plain concrete supporting pedestals or columns are permitted, provided the projection of the footing beyond the face of the supported member does not exceed the footing thickness.
(c) Plain concrete footings supporting walls are permitted provided the footings have at least two continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars. Bars shall not be smaller than No. 4 and shall have a total area of not less than 0.002 times the gross cross-sectional area of the footing. A minimum of one bar shall be provided at the top and bottom of the footing. Continuity of reinforcement shall be provided at corners and intersections.

Exceptions:

1. Detached one- and two-family dwellings three stories or less in height and constructed with stud-bearing walls, are permitted to have plain concrete footings with at least two continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars not smaller than No. 4 are permitted to have a total area of less than 0.002 times the gross cross-sectional area of the footing.

SECTION 110.04.200 – Section 1905.1 is amended and Sections 1905.1.9 thru 1905.1.11 are added to Chapter 19 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
1905.1 General. The text of ACI 318 shall be modified as indicated in Sections 1905.1.1 through 1905.1.11.
1905.1.9 ACI 318, Section 18.7.5 . Modify ACI 318, Section 18.7.5, by adding Section 18.7.5.8 and

18.7.5.9 as follows:

18.7.5.8 Where the calculated point of contraflexure is not within the middle half of the member clear height, provide transverse reinforcement as specified in ACI 318 Sections 18.7.5.1, Items (a) through (c), over the full height of the member.

18.7.5.9 – At any section where the design strength, Pn, of the column is less than the sum of the shears Ve computed in accordance with ACI 318 Sections 18.7.6.1 and 18.6.5.1 for all the beams framing into the column above the level under consideration, transverse reinforcement as specified in ACI 318 Sections 18.7.5.1 through 18.7.5.3 shall be provided. For beams framing into opposite sides of the column, the moment components are permitted to be assumed to be of opposite sign. 569
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 17
For the determination of the design strength, Pn, of the column, these moments are permitted to be assumed to result from the deformation of the frame in any one principal axis. 1905.1.10 ACI 318, Section 18.10.4. Modify ACI 318, Section 18.10.4, by adding Section 18.10.4.7 as follows:

18.10.4.7 – Walls and portions of walls with Pu > 0.35Po shall not be considered to contribute to the calculated shear strength of the structure for resisting earthquake-induced forces. Such walls shall conform to the requirements of ACI 318 Section 18.14.
1905.1.11 ACI 318, Section 18.12.6. Modify ACI 318, by adding Section 18.12.6.2 as follows:

18.12.6.2 Collector and boundary elements in topping slabs placed over precast floor and roof elements shall not be less than 3 inches (76 mm) or 6 d b in thickness, where db is the diameter of the largest reinforcement in the topping slab.

SECTION 110.04.210 –Section 2304.10.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2304.10.2 Fastener requirements. Connections for wood members shall be designed in accordance with the appropriate methodology in Section 2302.1. The number and size of fasteners connecting wood members shall not be less than that set forth in Table 2304.10.2. Staple fasteners in Table 2304.10.2 shall not be used to resist or transfer seismic forces in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

Exception: Staples may be used to resist or transfer seismic forces when the allowable shear values are substantiated by cyclic testing and approved by the building official.

SECTION 110.04.220 – Section 2304.10.3.1 is added to Chapter 23 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
2304.10.3.1 Quality of nails. In Seismic Design Category D, E or F, mechanically driven nails used in wood structural panel shear walls shall meet the same dimensions as that required for hand-driven nails, including diameter, minimum length and minimum head diameter. Clipped head or box nails are not permitted in new construction. The allowable design value for clipped head nails in existing construction may be taken at no more than the nail-head-area ratio of that of the same size hand-driven nails.

SECTION 110.04.230 –Section 2304.12.5 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2304.12.5 Wood used in retaining walls and cribs. Wood installed in retaining or crib walls shall be preservative treated in accordance with AWPA U1 for soil and fresh water use. Wood shall not be used in retaining or crib walls for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

SECTION 110.04.240 – Section 2305.4 is added to Chapter 23 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
2305.4 Hold-down connectors. In Seismic Design Category D, E or F, hold-down connectors shall be designed to resist shear wall overturning moments using approved cyclic load values or 75 percent of the allowable seismic load values that do not consider cyclic loading of the product.

Connector bolts into wood framing shall require steel plate washers on the post on the opposite side of the anchorage device. Plate size shall be a minimum of 0.229 inch by 3 inches by 3 inches (5.82 mm by 76 mm by 76 mm) in size. Hold-down connectors shall be tightened to finger tight plus one half (1/2) wrench turn just prior to covering the wall framing. 570
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 18
SECTION 110.04.250 – Section 2306.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2306.2 Wood-frame diaphragms. Wood-frame diaphragms shall be designed and constructed in accordance with AWC SDPWS. Where panels are fastened to framing members with staples, requirements and limitations of AWC SDPWS shall be met and the allowable shear values set forth in Table 2306.2(1) or 2306.2(2) shall only be permitted for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category A, B, or C.

Exception: Allowable shear values where panels are fastened to framing members with staples may be used if such values are substantiated by cyclic testing and approved by the building official.

The allowable shear values in Tables 2306.2(1) and 2306.2(2) are permitted to be increased 40 percent for wind design.

Wood structural panel diaphragms used to resist seismic forces in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F shall be applied directly to the framing members.

Exception: Wood structural panel diaphragms are permitted to be fastened over solid lumber planking or laminated decking, provided the panel joints and lumber planking or laminated decking joints do not coincide.

SECTION 110.04.260 – Section 2306.3 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2306.3 Wood-frame shear walls. Wood-frame shear walls shall be designed and constructed in accordance with AWC SDPWS. For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F, application of Tables 4.3A and 4.3B of ANSI/AWC SDPWS shall include the following:

1. Wood structural panel thickness for shear walls shall not be less than 3/8 inch thick and studs shall not be spaced at more than 16 inches on center.

2. The maximum nominal unit shear capacities for 3/8 inch wood structural panels resisting seismic forces in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F is 400 pounds per linear foot (plf).

Exception: Other nominal unit shear capacities may be permitted if such values are substantiated by cyclic testing and approved by the building official.

3. Nails shall be placed not less than 1/2 inch in from the panel edges and not less than 3/8 inch from the edge of the connecting members for shear greater than 350 plf using ASD or 500 plf using LRFD. Nails shall be placed not less than 3/8 inch from panel edges and not less than 1/4 inch from the edge of the connecting members for shears of 350 plf or less using ASD or 500 plf or less using LRFD.

For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F application of Table 4.3B of ANSI/AWC SDPWS shall not be allowed.

For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F, application of Table 4.3C of ANSI/AWC SDPWS shall not be used below the top level in a multi-level building.

Where panels are fastened to framing members with staples, requirements and limitations of AWC SDPWS shall be met and the allowable shear values set forth in Table 2306.3(1), 2306.3(2) or 2306.3(3) shall only be permitted for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category A, B, or C.

Exception: Allowable shear values where panels are fastened to framing members with staples may be used if such values are substantiated by cyclic testing and approved by the building official. 571
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 19
The allowable shear values in Tables 2306.3(1) and 2306.3(2) are permitted to be increased 40 percent for wind design. Panels complying with ANSI/APA PRP-210 shall be permitted to use design values for Plywood Siding in the ANSI/AWC SDPWS.

SECTION 110.04.270 – Section 2307.2 is added to the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code to read as follows:
2307.2 Wood-frame shear walls. Wood-frame shear walls shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Section 2306.3 as applicable.
572
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 20
Table 2308.6.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
573
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 21
SECTION 110.04.280 – Sections 2308.6.5.1 and 2308.6.5.2 and Figures 2308.6.5.1 and 2308.6.5.2 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code are amended to read as follows:
2308.6.5.1 Alternate braced wall (ABW).An ABW shall be constructed in accordance with this section and Figure 2308.6.5.1. In one-story buildings, each panel shall have a length of not less than 2 feet 8 inches (813 mm) and a height of not more than 10 feet (3048 mm). Each panel shall be sheathed on one face with 3/8-inch (3.2 mm) minimum-thickness wood structural panel sheathing nailed with 8d common or galvanized box nails in accordance with Table 2304.10.1 and blocked at wood structural panel edges. For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D or E, each panel shall be sheathed on one face with 15/32-inch-minimum-thickness (11.9 mm) wood structural panel sheathing nailed with 8d common nails spaced 3 inches on panel edges, 3 inches at intermediate supports. Two anchor bolts installed in accordance with Section 2308.3.1 shall be provided in each panel. Anchor bolts shall be placed at each panel outside quarter points. Each panel end stud shall have a hold-down device fastened to the foundation, capable of providing an approved uplift capacity of not less than 1,800 pounds (8006 N). The hold-down device shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The ABW shall be supported directly on a foundation or on floor framing supported directly on a foundation that is continuous across the entire length of the braced wall line. This foundation shall be reinforced with not less than one No. 4 bar top and bottom. Where the continuous foundation is required to have a depth greater than 12 inches (305 mm), a minimum 12-inch by 12-inch (305 mm by 305 mm) continuous footing or turned-down slab edge is permitted at door openings in the braced wall line. This continuous footing or turned-down slab edge shall be reinforced with not less than one No. 4 bar top and bottom. This reinforcement shall be lapped 15 24 inches (381 610 mm) with the reinforcement required in the continuous foundation located directly under the braced wall line.

Where the ABW is installed at the first story of two-story buildings, the wood structural panel sheathing shall be provided on both faces, three anchor bolts shall be placed at one-quarter points and tie-down device uplift capacity shall be not less than 3,000 pounds (13 344 N). 2308.6.5.2 Portal frame with hold-downs (PFH). A PFH shall be constructed in accordance with this section and Figure 2308.6.5.2. The adjacent door or window opening shall have a full-length header.

In one-story buildings, each panel shall have a length of not less than 16 inches (406 mm) and a height of not more than 10 feet (3048 mm). Each panel shall be sheathed on one face with a single layer of 3/8-inch (9.5 mm) minimum-thickness wood structural panel sheathing nailed with 8d common or galvanized box nails in accordance with Figure 2308.6.5.2. For structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D or E, each panel shall be sheathed on one face with 15/32-inch-minimum-thickness (11.9 mm) wood structural panel sheathing nailed with 8d common nails spaced 3 inches on panel edges, 3 inches at intermediate supports and in accordance with Figure 2308.6.5.2. The wood structural panel 574
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 22
sheathing shall extend up over the solid sawn or glued-laminated header and shall be nailed in accordance with Figure 2308.6.5.2. A built-up header consisting of at least two 2-inch by 12-inch (51 mm by 305 mm) boards, fastened in accordance with Item 24 of Table 2304.10.1 shall be permitted to be used. A spacer, if used, shall be placed on the side of the built-up beam opposite the wood structural panel sheathing. The header shall extend between the inside faces of the first full-length outer studs of each panel. The clear span of the header between the inner studs of each panel shall be not less than 6 feet (1829 mm) and not more than 18 feet (5486 mm) in length. A strap with an uplift capacity of not less than 1,000 pounds (4,400 N) shall fasten the header to the inner studs opposite the sheathing.

One anchor bolt not less than 5/8 inch (15.9 mm) diameter and installed in accordance with Section 2308.3.1 shall be provided in the center of each sill plate. The studs at each end of the panel shall have a hold-down device fastened to the foundation with an uplift capacity of not less than 3,500 pounds (15 570 N).

Where a panel is located on one side of the opening, the header shall extend between the inside face of the first full-length stud of the panel and the bearing studs at the other end of the opening. A strap with an uplift capacity of not less than 1,000 pounds (4400 N) shall fasten the header to the bearing studs. The bearing studs shall also have a hold-down device fastened to the foundation with an uplift capacity of not less than 1,000 pounds (4400 N). The hold-down devices shall be an embedded strap type, installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The PFH panels shall be supported directly on a foundation that is continuous across the entire length of the braced wall line.

This foundation shall be reinforced with not less than one No. 4 bar top and bottom. Where the continuous foundation is required to have a depth greater than 12 inches (305 mm), a minimum 12- inch by 12-inch (305 mm by 305 mm) continuous footing is permitted at door openings in the braced wall line. This continuous footing shall be reinforced with not less than one No. 4 bar top and bottom.

This reinforcement shall be lapped not less than 24 inches (610 mm) with the reinforcement required in the continuous foundation located directly under the braced wall line.

Where a PFH is installed at the first story of two-story buildings, each panel shall have a length of not less than 24 inches (610 mm).
575
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 23
SECTION 110.04.290 – Section 2308.6.8.1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2308.6.8.1 Foundation requirements. Braced wall lines shall be supported by continuous foundations.

Exception: For structures with a maximum plan dimension not more than 50 feet (15240 mm), continuous foundations are required at exterior walls only for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category A, B, or C.

For structures in Seismic Design Categories D and E, exterior braced wall panels shall be in the same plane vertically with the foundation or the portion of the structure containing the offset shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice and Section 2308.1.1.

SECTION 110.04.300 – Section 2308.6.9 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:
2308.6.9 Attachment of sheathing. Fastening of braced wall panel sheathing shall not be less than that prescribed in Tables 2308.6.1 or 2304.10.1. Wall sheathing shall not be attached to framing members by adhesives. Staple fasteners in Table 2304.10.1 shall not be used to resist or transfer seismic forces in structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F.

Exception: Staples may be used to resist or transfer seismic forces when the allowable shear values are substantiated by cyclic testing and approved by the building official.

All braced wall panels shall extend to the roof sheathing and shall be attached to parallel roof rafters or blocking above with framing clips (18 gauge minimum) spaced at maximum 24 inches (6096 mm) on center with four 8d nails per leg (total eight 8d nails per clip). Braced wall panels shall be laterally braced at each top corner and at maximum 24 inches (6096 mm) intervals along the top plate of discontinuous vertical framing.

SECTION 110.04.310 – Section 3115 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code is amended to read as follows:

SECTION 3115

INTERMODAL SHIPPING CONTAINERS
3115.1 General. The provisions of Section 3115 and other applicable sections of this code shall apply to intermodal shipping containers that are repurposed for use as buildings or structures or as a part of buildings or structures.

Exceptions:

1. Intermodal shipping containers previously approved as existing relocatable buildings complying with Chapter 14 of the California Existing Building Code.

2. Stationary battery storage arrays located in intermodal shipping containers complying with Chapter 12 of the California Fire Code.

3. Intermodal shipping containers that are listed as equipment complying with the standard for equipment, such as air chillers, engine generators, modular data centers, and other similar equipment.

4. Intermodal shipping containers housing or supporting experimental equipment are exempt from the requirements of Section 3115, provided they comply with all of the following:

4.1. Such units will be single stand-alone units supported at grade level and used only for occupancies as specified under Risk Category I in Table 1604.5.

4.2. Such units are located a minimum of 8 feet (2438 mm) from adjacent structures, and are not connected to a fuel gas system or fuel gas utility. 576
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 24

4.3. In hurricane-prone regions and flood hazard areas, such units are designed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 16.

5. [HCD] Shipping containers constructed or converted off-site that meet the definition of Factory- built Housing in Health and Safety Code Section 19971 or Commercial Modular(s) as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 18001.8 shall be approved by the Department of Housing and Community Development.

6. Single-unit stand-alone intermodal shipping containers used as temporary storage or construction trailer on active construction sites. Construction support facilities for uses and activities not directly associated with the actual processes of construction, including but not limited to, offices, meeting rooms, plan rooms, other administrative or support functions shall not be exempt from Section 3115.
3115.2 Construction documents. The construction documents shall contain information to verify the dimensions and establish the physical properties of the steel components and wood floor components of the intermodal shipping container, in addition to the information required by Sections 107 and 1603. 3115.3 Intermodal shipping container information. Intermodal shipping containers shall bear an existing data plate containing the following information as required by ISO 6346 and verified by an approved agency. A report of the verification process and findings shall be provided to the building owner.

1. Manufacturer’s name or identification number.

2. Date manufactured.

3. Safety approval number.

4. Identification number.

5. Maximum operating gross mass or weight (kg) (lbs).

6. Allowable stacking load for 1.8G (kg) (lbs).

7. Transverse racking test force (Newtons).

8. Valid maintenance examination date.

Where approved by the building official, the markings and existing data plate are permitted to be removed from the intermodal shipping containers before they are repurposed for use as buildings or structures or as part of buildings or structures.
3115.4 Protection against decay and termites. Wood structural floors of intermodal shipping containers shall be protected from decay and termites in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 2304.12.1.1.
3115.5 Under-floor ventilation. The space between the bottom of the floor joists and the earth under any intermodal shipping container, except spaces occupied by basements and cellars, shall be provided with ventilation in accordance with Section 1202.4. 3115.6 Roof assemblies. Intermodal shipping container roof assemblies shall comply with the applicable requirements of Chapter 15.

Exception: Single-unit, stand-alone intermodal shipping containers not attached to, or stacked vertically over, other intermodal shipping containers, buildings or structures. 3115.7 Joints and voids. Joints and voids that create concealed spaces between intermodal shipping containers, that are connected or stacked, at fire-resistance-rated walls, floor or floor/ceiling assemblies and roofs or roof/ceiling assemblies shall be protected by an approved fire-resistant joint system in accordance with Section 715.
3115.8 Structural. Intermodal shipping containers that conform to ISO 1496-1 and are repurposed for use as buildings or structures, or as a part of buildings or structures, shall be designed in accordance with Chapter 16 and this section.
577
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 25
3115.8.1 Foundations and supports. Intermodal shipping containers repurposed for use as a permanent building or structure shall be supported on foundations or other supporting structures designed and constructed in accordance with Chapters 16 through 23. 3115.8.1.1 Anchorage. Intermodal shipping containers shall be anchored to foundations or other supporting structures as necessary to provide a continuous load path for all applicable design and environmental loads in accordance with Chapter 16.
3115.8.1.2 Stacking. Intermodal shipping containers used to support stacked units shall comply with Section 3115.8.4.
3115.8.2 Welds. The strength of new welds and connections shall be no less than the strength provided by the original connections. All new welds and connections shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Chapters 16, 17 and 22.
3115.8.3 Structural design. The structural design of the intermodal shipping containers repurposed for use as a building or structure, or as part of a building or structure, shall comply with Section 3115.8.4 or 3115.8.5.
3115.8.4 Detailed structural design procedure. A structural analysis meeting the requirements of this section shall be provided to the building official to demonstrate the structural adequacy of the intermodal shipping containers.

Exception: Structures using an intermodal shipping containers designed in accordance with Section 3115.8.5.
3115.8.4.1 Material properties. Structural material properties for existing intermodal shipping container steel components shall be established by Section 2202. 3115.8.4.2 Seismic design parameters. The seismic force-resisting system shall be designed and detailed in accordance with ASCE 7 and one of the following:

1. Where all or portions of the profiled steel panel elements are considered to be the seismic force-resisting system, design and detailing shall be in accordance with AISI S100 and ASCE 7, Table 12.2-1 requirements for steel systems not specifically detailed for seismic resistance, excluding cantilevered column systems.

2. Where all or portions of the profiled steel panel elements are retained, but are not considered to be part of the seismic force-resisting system, an independent seismic force- resisting system shall be selected, designed and detailed in accordance with ASCE 7, Table 12.2-1, or

3. Where all or portions of the profiled steel panel elements are retained and integrated into a seismic force-resisting system other than as permitted by Section 3115.8.4.2 Item 1, seismic design parameters shall be developed from testing and analysis in accordance with Section 104.11 and ASCE 7, Section 12.2.1.1 or 12.2.1.2. 3115.8.4.3 Allowable shear value. The allowable shear values for the profiled steel panel side walls and end walls shall be determined in accordance with the design approach selected in Section 3115.8.4.2. Where penetrations are made in the side walls or end walls designated as part of the lateral force-resisting system, the penetrations shall be substantiated by rational analysis. 3115.8.5 Simplified structural design procedure of single-unit containers. Single-unit intermodal shipping containers conforming to the limitations of Section 3115.8.5.1 shall be permitted to be designed in accordance with Sections 3115.8.5.2 and 3115.8.5.3. 3115.8.5.1 Limitations. Use of Section 3115.8.5 is subject to all the following limitations:
578
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 26

1. The intermodal shipping container shall be a single-unit, stand-alone unit supported on a foundation and shall not be in contact with or supporting any other shipping container or other structure.

2. The intermodal shipping container’s top and bottom rails, corner castings, and columns or any portion thereof shall not be notched, cut, or removed in any manner.

3. The intermodal shipping container shall be erected in a level and horizontal position with the floor located at the bottom.

4. The intermodal shipping container shall be located in Seismic Design Category A, B, C and D.
3115.8.5.2 Simplified structural design assumptions. Where permitted by Section 3115.8.5.1, single-unit stand-alone, intermodal shipping containers shall be designed using the following assumptions for the profiled steel panel side walls and end walls:

1. The appropriate detailing requirements contained in Chapters 16 through 23.

2. Response modification coefficient, R = 2.

3. Over strength factor, Ω0 = 2.5.

4. Deflection amplification factor, Cd = 2.

5. Limits on structural height, hn = 9.5 feet (2900 mm). 3115.8.5.3 Allowable shear value. The allowable shear values for the profiled steel panel side walls (longitudinal) and end walls (transverse) for wind design and seismic design using the coefficients of Section 3115.8.5.2 shall be in accordance with Table 3115.8.5.3, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

1. The total linear length of all openings in any individual side walls or end walls shall be limited to not more than 50 percent of the length of that side walls or end walls, as shown in Figure 3115.8.5.3(1).

2. Any full height wall length, or portion thereof, less than 4 feet (305 mm) long shall not be considered as a portion of the lateral force-resisting system, as shown in Figure 3115.8.5.3(2).

3. All side walls or end walls used as part of the lateral force-resisting system shall have an existing or new boundary element on all sides to form a continuous load path, or paths, with adequate strength and stiffness to transfer all forces from the point of application to the final point of resistance, as shown in Figure 3115.8.5.3(3). The existing door interlocking mechanism shall not be considered as a component of the required load path.

4. Where openings are made in container walls, floors or roofs, for doors, windows and other openings:

4.1 The opening shall be framed with steel elements that are designed in accordance with Chapters 16 and 22.

4.2 The cross section and material grade of any new steel element shall be equal to or greater than the steel element removed.
579
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 27

5. A maximum of one penetration not greater than a 6-inch (152 mm) diameter hole for conduits, pipes, tubes or vents, or not greater than16 square inches (10 322mm 2) for electrical boxes, is permitted for each individual 8 feet (2438 mm) length of lateral force- resisting wall. Penetrations located in walls that are not part of the wall lateral force resisting system shall not be limited in size or quantity. Existing intermodal shipping container’s vents shall not be considered a penetration, as shown in Figure 3115.8.5.3(4).

6. End wall door or doors designated as part of the lateral force-resisting system shall be intermittently welded closed around the full perimeters of the door panels.

TABLE 3114.8.5.3

ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES FOR PROFILED STEEL PANEL

SIDE WALLS AND END WALLS FOR WIND OR SEISMIC LOADING

CONTAINER
DESIGNATION 2

CONTAINER

DIMENSION
(Nominal Length)

CONTAINER

DIMENSION
(Nominal Height)

ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES
(PLF) 1,3
Side Wall End Wall
1EEE 45 feet (13.7 M) 9.5 feet (2896 mm) 75
843
1EE 8.6 feet (2591 mm)
1AAA
40 feet (12.2 M)

9.5 feet (2896 mm)
841AA 8.5 feet (2592 mm)
1A 8.0 feet (2438 mm)
1AX <8.0 feet (2483 mm)
1BBB
30 feet (9.1 M)

9.5 feet (2896 mm)
1121BB 8.5 feet (2591 mm)
1B 8.0 feet (2438 mm)
1BX <8.0 feet (2438 mm)
1CC
20 feet (9.1 M)

8.5 feet (2591 mm)
1681C 8.0 feet (2438 mm)
1CX <8.0 feet (2438 mm)

1. The allowable strength for the side walls and end walls of the intermodal shipping containers are derived from ISO 1496-1 and reduced by a factor of safety of 5.

2. Container designation type is derived from ISO 668.

3. Limitations of Sections 3114.8.5.1 and 3114.8.5.3 shall apply. 580
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 28
FIGURE 3114.8.5.3(1)
Bracing Unit Distribution – Maximum Linear Length
FIGURE 3114.8.5.3(2)
Bracing Unit Distribution – Minimum Linear Length
581
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 29
FIGURE 3114.8.5.3(3)
Bracing Unit Distribution – Boundary Elements
FIGURE 3114.8.5.3(4)
Bracing Unit Distribution – Penetrating Limitations
582
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 30
SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Buildings and development projects that are subject to CEQA are reviewed individually prior to issuance of building permit. Moreover, State law provides that the 2022 Building Codes will take effect in the City even if the City does not adopt this ordinance, as is required by law. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file a Notice of Exemption with the Clerk of Riverside County within five (5) days of the adoption of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. That when this Ordinance takes effect, it shall not change any of the provisions of the previous codes and Ordinances or affect any offense, acts done or required to be done, penalties, forfeitures or punishments incurred, rights or liabilities accrued or claims arising out of the provisions of the previous Ordinances and amendments. Any pending actions shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance. Any previous discontinuance, abatement, or liabilities of any person shall not be affected by the enactment of this Ordinance.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. 583
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 31
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January, 2023. ____________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
584
ORDINANCE NO.

PAGE 32

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
585
1 ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE WITH APPENDICES
AND AMENDING IN FULL TITLE 110, CHAPTER 110.20 OF THE

EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, Sections 17922, 17958, and 18941.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the governing body of every city or county shall adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the same requirements as those contained in the most recently adopted version of the California Building Standards Code; and,
WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.5, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that a city or county may make such changes or modifications to the requirements contained in the California Building Standards Code which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and,
WHEREAS, Sections 17958, 17958.7, and 18941.5 of the California Health & Safety Code provide that prior to making any change or modification to the California Building Standards Code authorized by the Health & Safety Code, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is required to make an express finding that such modifications or changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Building Standards Code and/or that do not otherwise modify a Building Standard; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is in a liquefaction zone; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is subject to ground tremors from large seismic events along, but not limited to, the San Andreas Fault.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds as follows:

A. The California Health and Safety Code Sections 17958, 17958.5, 17958.7, and 18941.5 authorize cities and counties to adopt more restrictive standards and modifications or changes to the California Fire Code that are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographical conditions.

B. The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that these local climatic, geological or topographical conditions include, but are not limited to, the following:

I. Climatic Conditions
586
2 A. The City of Eastvale is located in Riverside County. Riverside County is located in Southern California and covers a vast and varied geographic area. The base climate in western Riverside County consists of semi arid Mediterranean weather patterns. Eastern Riverside County is a desert area with Mohave Desert temperatures and weather patterns. Those two primary areas are divided by the San Bernardino Mountain Range. Both areas outside of the mountain terrain annually experience extended periods of high temperatures with little or no precipitation. Hot, dry winds, which may reach speeds of 70 M.P.H. or greater, are common to the area. Examples are: Santa Ana/ Foehn winds, afternoon surface-heating generated winds, and prevailing desert winds.

These climatic conditions cause extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials.

Frequent periods of drought and low humidity add to the fire danger. This predisposes the area to large destructive fires (conflagration) which necessitates rapid identification, locating and extinguishment of all fires in the smallest stage possible. In addition to directly damaging or destroying buildings, these fires are also prone to disrupt utility services throughout the County.

Obstacles generated by a strong wind, such as fallen trees, street lights and utility poles, will greatly impact the response time to reach an incident scene. During these winds, the inability to use aerial type firefighting apparatus would further decrease our ability to stop fires in large buildings and place rescue personnel at increased risk of injury.

B. Although the City of Eastvale and Riverside County occasionally experiences periods of significant drought, the County can also experience periods of substantial rainfall. Annual rainfall varying from three (3) inches in Blythe to over thirty three (33) inches in Pine Cove. When Riverside County does experience heavy rain, or rain over a period of days or weeks, many areas of the County are subject to flooding. Runoff from rain drains either naturally into rivers, washes, and creeks or into flood control facilities. Flash flooding is also a common problem, especially in the Coachella Valley and the easterly portions of the county. Flash flooding is typically associated with short duration, high intensity precipitation events often associated with summer thunderstorms. Such events can occur even during a drought.

C. Water demand in densely populated Southern California far exceeds the quantity supplied by natural precipitation; and although the population continues to grow, the already-taxed water supply does not. California is projected to increase in population by nearly 10 million over the next quarter of a century with 50 percent of that growth centered in Southern California. Due to storage capacities and consumption, and a limited amount of rainfall future water allocation is not fully dependable. This necessitates the need for additional and on-site fire protection features. It would also leave tall buildings vulnerable to uncontrolled fires due to a lack of available water and an inability to pump sufficient quantities of available water to floors in a fire.

D. These dry climatic conditions and winds contribute to the rapid spread of even small fires originating in high-density housing or vegetation. These fires spread very quickly and create a need for increased levels of fire protection. The added protection of fire sprinkler systems and other fire protection features such as identification and notification will supplement normal fire department response by providing immediate protection for the building occupants and by containing and controlling the fire spread to the area of origin. Fire sprinkler systems will also reduce the use of water for firefighting by as much as 50 to 75 percent.
587
3 II. Topographical conditions
A. Natural: The topographical conditions of Riverside County vary from three hundred (300) feet below sea-level, flat desert communities, to mountains over ten thousand (10,000) feet in Alpine-like areas of the San Bernardino Mountain Range. In between these areas, developable slopes of 25 percent and greater generally occur throughout the foothills. Riverside County extends from Orange County to the State of Arizona and is mixed with congested urban areas, rural lands and wild lands.

A large number of sensitive habitats for various animal species and vegetation consist within large open space areas between major urban centers that impact building and structure location, which impedes emergency access and response. This variety in regions contributes to an increased emergency response time, which necessitates cooperation between local agencies.

B. Traffic and circulation congestion is an artificially created, obstructive topographical condition, which is common throughout Riverside County.

C. These topographical conditions combine to create a situation, which places fire department response time to fire occurrences at risk, and makes it necessary to provide automatic on-site fire- extinguishing systems and other protection measures to protect occupants and property.

III. Geological Conditions
Located within Riverside County are several known active and potentially active earthquake faults, including the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault. In the event of an earthquake, the location of the epicenter as well as the time of day and season of the year would have a profound effect on the number of deaths and casualties, as well as property damage.

The major form of direct damage from most earthquakes is damage to construction. Bridges are particularly vulnerable to collapse, and dam failure may generate major downstream flooding.

Buildings vary in susceptibility, dependent upon construction and the types of soils on which they are built. Earthquakes destroy power and telephone lines; gas, sewer, or water mains; which, in tum, may set off fires and/or hinder firefighting or rescue efforts. The hazard of earthquakes varies from place to place, dependent upon the regional and local geology. Ground shaking may occur in areas 65 miles or more from the epicenter (the point on the ground surface above the focus). Ground shaking can change the mechanical properties of some fine grained, saturated soils, where upon they liquefy and act as a fluid (liquefaction).

A. Previous earthquakes in southern California have been accompanied by disruption of traffic flow and fires. A severe seismic event has the potential to negatively impact any rescue or fire suppression activities because it is likely to create obstacles similar to those indicated under the high wind section above. With the probability of strong aftershocks there exists a need to provide increased protection for anyone on upper floors of buildings.

B. Road circulation features located throughout the County also make amendments reasonably necessary. Located through the County are major roadways, highways and flood control channels that create barriers and slow response times. Hills, slopes, street and storm drain design accompanied with occasional heavy rainfall, cause roadway flooding and landslides and at times 588
4 may make an emergency access route impassable. There are areas in Riverside County that naturally have extended emergency response times that exceed the 5 minute goal.

California Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.7 and 18941.5 require that the modification or change be expressly marked and identified as to which each finding refers. Therefore, the City Council finds that the following table sets forth the 2022 California Fire Code sections that have been modified and the associated local climatic, geological and/or topographical conditions described above supporting the modification.
589
5 2022 CODE

SECTION TITLE/SUBJECT FINDINGS I,

II, III
101.4 Severability Administrative
102.5 Application of residential code I, II & III
104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department Administrative 104.7 and 104.7.1 Liability Administrative
104.13 Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas Administrative
107.2 Schedule of permit fees Administrative
107.7 Cost Recovery Administrative
111.1 Board of Appeals established Administrative
112.4 Violation and Penalties Administrative
202 Fire Chief Administrative
308.1.6.3 Sky Lanterns or similar devices I, II & III
503.2.1 Dimensions Administrative
503.2.2 Authority Administrative
503.6.1 Automatic opener Administrative
503.7 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas Administrative 507.5.7 Fire hydrant size and outlets I & III
507.5.8 Fire hydrant street marker I, II & III
508.1, 508.1.1,
508.1.3 Fire command center I, II & III
509.2.1 Minimum clearances I & III
608.11.1.2 Manual operation II & III
903.2 Where required (automatic sprinkler systems) I, II & III 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems I & II
3204.2.1 Minimum requirements for client leased or occupant owned warehouses Administrative
4904.2.1 High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps Administrative App Ch B, Table
B105.2
Fire-Flow - Buildings other than one- or two-family
dwellings I, II & III
App Ch C, C103.1 Hydrant spacing I, II & III
Section 2. TITLE 110, CHAPTER 110.20 of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in full to read as follows:

Sections:
110.20.010 - Findings and adoption of the California Fire Code. 110.20 .020 - Amendments to the California Fire Code.
110.20.030 - Penalties.

Sec . 110.20.010. Findings and adoption of the California Fire Code. 590
6 Except as stated in this Section or as amended below in Section 5 of this ordinance, all of the provisions and appendices of the 2022 California Fire Code, inclusive of all of the inclusions and exclusions set for in each chapter's matrix, are hereby adopted and shall apply to the City of Eastvale. In addition, the following provisions that are excluded in the 2022 California Fire Code are hereby adopted- Chapter 1, Division II of the California Fire Code is hereby adopted, except that Section 103.2 and 109 .3 are not adopted, and Chapters 3, 25, and Sections 403.12, 503, 510.2, and 1103.2 are adopted.

One certified copy of each of the 2022 California Fire Code are on file in the office of the City Clerk, and any and all references thereto, are adopted as the Fire Code and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms thereof are referred to, adopted end made a part of this chapter, as though fully set forth at length.

The City Council finds that the requirements set out here are reasonable and necessary modifications because of climatic, geological and topographical conditions within the City of Eastvale. The City of Eastvale in co-operation with the Riverside County Fire Department may establish more restrictive standards reasonably necessary to provide fire protection for life and property due to these conditions.

This chapter shall be cited as the "Fire Code" of the City of Eastvale and any references to the "California Fire Code" or "Fire Code" shall be deemed to refer to and apply to this chapter . Sec. 110.20.020 . - Amendments to the California Fire Code. The codes, chapters, standards and appendices are amended as specifically set forth in the following chapters:

Sec . 110.20.020. Amendments to the California Fire Code.

The codes, chapters, standards and appendices are amended as specifically set forth in the following chapters:

Chapter 1. Scope and Administration
A. SCOPE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

1. Section 101.4 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
101.4 Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.

B. APPLICABILITY.

1. Section 102.5 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows:
591
7 102.5 Application of residential code. Where structures are designed and constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code, the provisions of this code shall apply as follows:

1. Construction and design provisions of this code pertaining to the exterior of the structure shall apply including, but not limited to, premises identification, fire apparatus access and water supplies. Where interior or exterior systems or devices are installed, construction permits required by Section 105.6 of this code shall apply.

2. Administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of this code shall apply.

3. Automatic fire sprinkler system requirements of this code shall apply to detached accessory buildings 3,600 square feet or greater in accordance with Section 903.2. The provisions contained in Section 903.2.18 of the California Fire Code or Section R309.6 of the California Residential Code may be used for the design of the automatic fire sprinkler system for detached private garages.

C. DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL.

1. A new Section 104.1.1 is added to Section 104.1 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department.

1. The Fire Chief is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable State fire laws and provisions of this ordinance and to perform such duties as directed by the City of Eastvale City Council.

2. The Fire Chief is authorized to administer, interpret and enforce this ordinance. Under the Fire Chief’s direction, the Riverside County Fire Department is authorized to enforce ordinances of the City of Eastvale pertaining to the following:

2.1. The prevention of fires.

2.2. The suppression or extinguishment of dangerous or hazardous fires.

2.3. The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials.

2.4. The installation and maintenance of automatic, manual and other private fire alarm systems and fire extinguishing equipment.

2.5. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes.

2.6. The maintenance of fire protection and the elimination of fire hazards on land, in buildings, structures and other property, including those under construction.

2.7. The maintenance of means of egress.

2.8. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of fire and unauthorized releases of hazardous materials.

3. The following persons are hereby authorized to interpret and enforce the provisions of this ordinance and to make arrests and issue citations as authorized by law:

3.1. The Unit Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

3.2. The Fire Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the Riverside County Fire Department.
592
8 3.3. The Riverside County Sheriff and any deputy sheriff.

3.4. The Police Chief and any police officer of any city served by the Riverside County Fire Department.

3.5. Officers of the California Highway Patrol.

3.6. Code Officers of the Riverside County Code Enforcement Department.

3.7. Peace Officers of the California Department of Parks and Recreation.

3.8. The law enforcement officer of the Federal Bureau of Land Management.

2. Sections 104.7 and 104.7.1 of the California Fire Code are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
104.7 Liability. Any liability against the City of Eastvale or Riverside County or any officer or employee for damages resulting from the discharge of their duties shall be as provided by law.

3. A new Section 104.13 is added to Section 104 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
104.13 Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas.Except upon National Forest Land, the Fire Chief is authorized to determine and announce the closure of any hazardous fire area or portion thereof. Any closure by the Fire Chief for a period of more than fifteen (15) calendar days must be approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Fire Chief’s original order of closure. Upon such closure, no person shall go in or be upon any hazardous fire area, except upon the public roadways and inhabited areas.

During such closure, the Fire Chief shall erect and maintain at all entrances to the closed area sufficient signs giving notice of closure. This section shall not prohibit residents or owners of private property within any closed area, or their invitees, from going in or being upon their lands.

This section shall not apply to any entry, in the course of duty, by a peace officer, duly authorized public officer or fire department personnel. For the purpose of this section, “hazardous fire area” shall mean public or private land that is covered with grass, grain, brush or forest and situated in a location that makes suppression difficult resulting in great damage. Such areas are designated on Hazardous Fire Area maps filed with the office of the Fire Chief.

D. FEES.

1. Section 107.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
107.2 Schedule of permit fees. Fees for services and permits shall be as set forth in the adopted City of Eastvale fee schedules.

2. A new Section 107.7 is added to Section 106 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
107.7 Cost recovery . Fire suppression, investigation, rescue or emergency medical costs are recoverable in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1, as may be amended from time to time. Additionally, any person who negligently, intentionally or in violation of law causes an emergency response, including, but not limited to, a traffic accident, spill of toxic or flammable fluids or chemicals is liable for the costs of securing such emergency, including those costs pursuant to Government Code Section 53150, et seq, as may be amended from time to time. 593
9 Any expense incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such person and shall be collectable by Riverside County in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, express or implied.

E. MEANS OF APPEALS.

1. Section 111.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
111.1 Board of appeals established. The Board of Appeals shall be the City Manager. If he or she determines an outside board is needed, he or she shall designate an outside hearing officer to hear the appeal. The Fire Chief shall be notified of any appeal and the Fire Chief or designee shall be in attendance at the appeal hearing. Depending on the subject of the appeal, specialized expertise may be solicited, at the expense of the applicant, for the purpose of providing input to the Appeals Board.

F. VIOLATIONS.

1. Section 112.4 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
112.4 Violation and penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association of persons to violate any provision of this ordinance, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this code or Ordinance 787. Punishments and penalties for violations shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 725 and Health and Safety Code Sections 17995 through 17995.5.

G. DEFINITIONS.

1. Section 202, definition of “Fire Chief” in the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of Riverside County or the Fire Chief’s designee.

H. OPEN FLAMES.

1. Section 308.1.6.3 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns or similar devices. A person shall not release or cause to be released a sky lantern or similar device.

I. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS.

1. Section 503.2.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
594
10 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet (7315 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm). For additional requirements or alternatives see Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time.

2. Section 503.2.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall be the only authority authorized to designate fire apparatus access roads and fire lanes and to modify the minimum fire lane access widths for fire or rescue operations.

3. A new Section 503.6.1 is added to Section 503.6 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
503.6.1 Automatic opener. New motorized gates shall be provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicle in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time.

Exception: Gates serving individual one- and two-family dwelling parcels.

4. A new Section 503.7 is added to Section 503 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
503.7 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas . On private properties, where fire apparatus access roads are utilized for loading or unloading or utilized for passenger drop-off or pick-up, an additional eight (8) feet of width shall be added to the minimum required width for the fire apparatus access road.

J. FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPLIES.

1. A new Section 507.5.7 is added to Section 507 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
507.5.7 Fire hydrant size and outlets. As determined by the fire code official, fire hydrant sizes and outlets shall be based on the following:

1. Residential Standard – one (1) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and half (2 ½) inch outlet.

2. Super Hydrant Standard – one (1) four (4) inch outlet and two (2) two and one half (2 ½) inch outlet.

3. Super Hydrant Enhanced – two (2) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and one half (2 ½) inch outlet.

2. A new Section 507.5.8 is added to Section 507 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
507.5.8 Fire hydrant street marker . Fire hydrant locations shall be visually indicated in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Technical Policy 06-11, as may be amended from time to time. Any hydrant marker damaged or removed during the course of street 595
11 construction or repair shall be immediately replaced by the contractor, developer or person responsible for removal or damage.

K. FIRE COMMAND CENTER.

1. Section 508.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
508.1 General. Where required by other sections of this code and in all buildings classified as high-rise buildings by the California Building Code, in all buildings greater than 300,000 square feet (27 870 m2), and in Group I-2 occupancies having occupied floors located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access a fire command center for fire department operations shall be provided and shall comply with Sections 508.1.1 through 508.1.7.

2. Section 508.1.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
508.1.1 Location and access. The fire command center shall be located adjacent to the main lobby and shall be accessible from fire department vehicular access or as approved by the fire code official. The room shall have direct access from the building exterior at the lowest level of fire department access.

3. Section 508.1.3 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows:
508.1.3 Size. The fire command center shall be not less than 0.015 percent of the total building area of the facility served or 200 square feet (19 m2) in area, whichever is greater, with a minimum dimension of 0.7 times the square root of the room area or 10 feet (3048 mm), whichever is greater.

Where a fire command center is solely required because a building is greater than 300,000 square feet (27 870 m 2), the fire command center shall have a minimum size of 96 square feet (9 m2) with a minimum dimension of 8 feet (2438 mm) where approved by the fire code official.

L. FIRE PROTECTION AND UTILITY EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION AND ACCESS.

1. Section 509.2.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to add the following:
509.2.1 Minimum clearances. A 3-foot (914 mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of exterior fire protection system control valves, or any other exterior fire protection system component that may require immediate access, except as otherwise required or approved.

M. MECHANICAL REFRIGERATION.

1. Section 608.11.1.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
596
12 608.11.1.2 Manual operation . When required by the fire code official, automatic crossover valves shall be capable of manual operation. The manual valves shall be located in an approved location immediately outside of the machinery room in a secure metal box or equivalent and marked as Emergency Controls.

N. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.

1. Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
903.2 Where required. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification.

Where the Sections 903.2.1 – 903.2.21 of the California Fire Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence.

Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Building Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following:

1. Detached Group U occupancies used for agricultural purposes constructed in accordance with the California Building Code.

2. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena shade canopies that are open on all sides and used for riding only - no commercial, assembly or storage uses.

3. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade structures that are open on all sides and used to shade playground equipment, temporary storage of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking.

4. Where determined by the Fire Chief that no major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load does not pose a significant threat to firefighter safety or to other structures or property, automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted.

One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with the California Residential Code. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobilehomes, manufactured homes and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

The following exceptions in the California Fire Code shall not be allowed:
a. Exception in Section 903.2.3
b. Exception in Section 903.2.11.3

2. A new Section 903.3.5.3 is added to Section 903 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity.

O. DESIGNATION OF HIGH-PILED STORAGE AREAS.

1. A new Section 3204.2.1 is added to Section 3204.2 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
597
13 3204.2.1 Minimum requirements for client leased or occupant owned warehouses. Designs of an automatic sprinkler system for client leased or occupant owned buildings containing high pile storage shall be based on the requirements of NFPA 13. The responsible fire protection engineer shall perform a survey of the building to determine commodity classification, storage configuration, building height and other information related to the development of an appropriate sprinkler system design. The fire protection engineer shall also make reasonable efforts to meet with the building owner or operator to understand seasonal or customer related fluctuations to the stored commodities, storage height, and configuration. The sprinkler design shall be based on the most demanding requirements determined through the onsite survey and discussions with the building owner or operator. The technical report shall describe the basis for determining the commodity and sprinkler design selection, how the commodities will be isolated or separated, and include references to the design document(s). If a specific fire test is used as the basis of design, a copy of the fire test report shall be provided at the time of plan review.

P. FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES.

1. A new Section 4904.2.1 is added to Section 4904 of the California Fire Code to read as follows:
4904.2.1 High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps. In accordance with Government Code Sections 51175 through 51189, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), located in the Local Responsibility Areas (LRA), are designated as shown on the most recently published VHFHSZ IN LRA map, as recommended and published by the Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), which may be revised from time to time.

The most recent VHFHSZ IN LRA map is on file at the office of the Fire Chief, which supersedes other maps previously adopted by the City of Eastvale designating high fire hazard areas.

Q. APPENDIX B.

1. Table B105.2 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows:

TABLE B105.2

REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE- AND
TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND TOWNHOUSES

AUTOMATIC

SPRINKLER
SYSTEM
(Design Standard)

MINIMUM FIRE-FLOW
(gallons per minute)

FLOW DURATION
(hours)
No automatic sprinkler
system
Value in Table
B105.1(2)
Duration in Table
B105.1(2)
Section 903.3.1.1 of
the California Fire
Code
50% of the value in
Table B105.1(2)a
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the
reduced flow rate
Section 903.3.1.2 of
the California Fire
Code
50% of the value in
Table B105.1(2)b
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the
reduced flow rate
For SI: 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/m.
598
14 a. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute. b. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute.

R. APPENDIX C.

1. Section C103.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

C103.1 Hydrant spacing. Fire apparatus access roads and public streets providing required access to buildings in accordance with Section 503 of the California Fire Code shall be provided with one or more fire hydrants, as determined by Section C102.1. Where more than one fire hydrant is required, the distance between required fire hydrants shall be in accordance with Sections C103.2 and C103.3. Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections.

Sec . 110.20.030 . - Penalties.
(a) It is unlawful for any person, firm , corporation or association of persons to violate any provision of this chapter, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this chapter. Any person , firm, corporation or association of persons violating any provision of this chapter or the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this chapter shall be deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person or entity shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this Chapter, is committed, continued or permitted.
(b) Any person, firm, corporation or association of persons so convicted shall be:
(1) Guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding $200.00 for a first violation; (2) Guilty of an infraction offense and punishable by a fine not exceeding $300.00 for a second violation on the same site.

The third and any additional violations on the same site shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000.00 or six months in jail , or both.

Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. (c) Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person or entity from the responsibility for correcting the violation.

Section 3. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of its adoption but no sooner than January 1, 2023.
599
15 PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11 day of January, 2023. __________________________________________
Todd Rigby
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
600
16 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)§

CITY OF EASTVALE )

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
601
ORDINANCE NO. 23

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE ADDING CHAPTER 110.02 (ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 110.01 OF THE EASTVALE

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, California Building Standards Commission does not adopt the administration chapter of the California Codes therefor the City Council of Eastvale needs to adopt its own administration chapter; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Eastvale is not required to make an express finding for amendments necessary to carry out the application of the Administrative Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. “Chapter 110.01 is renamed to “Construction Debris”. Section 110.01.020 is repealed and reserve.”
SECTION 2. Chapter 110.02 (Administrative Code) is hereby added to the Eastvale Municipal Code to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 110.02.

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
SECTION 110.02.010 Title and Scope.

A. Title. This chapter shall be known as the “Eastvale Administrative Code.

B. Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall serve as the administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for all of this title and Chapter 110.01.

Exemption for Pending Applications. This chapter shall not apply to any building or structure for which application for a plan check, construction or demolition was made prior to January 1, 2023. Such buildings or structures shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered or repaired in accordance with the provisions in effect at the date of said application.

C. Intent. The purpose of this chapter is to establish the minimum requirements to safeguard the public health, safety and general welfare through structural strength, means of egress, facilities, stability, sanitation, adequate light and ventilation, energy conservation, and safety to life and property from fire and other hazards attributed to the built environment and to provide safety to firefighters and emergency responders during emergency operations.

D. Referenced Codes. The Codes listed in Section 110.02.040.D and referenced elsewhere in this section, shall be considered part of the requirements of the municipal code to the prescribed extent of each such reference.

1. Building Code. The provisions of this code shall apply to the constructions, alteration, relocation, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal and demolition of every building or structures or any appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures.

Exception: Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress, and their accessory structures not more than three stories above grade plane in height, shall comply with this code or the California Residential Code.

2. Residential Code. Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress, and their 602 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 2
accessory structures not more than three stories above grade plane in height, shall comply with this code or the California Residential Code.

Exception: the following shall be permitted to be constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code where the provided with a residential fire sprinklers system complying with California Residential Code section R313:

1. Live/work units complying with the requirements of Section 419 of the California Building Code.

2. Owner-occupied lodging houses with five or fewer guestrooms.

3. A care facility with five or fewer persons receiving custodial care within a dwelling unit.

4. A care facility for five or fewer persons receiving medical care within the dwelling unit.

5. A care facility for five or fewer persons receiving care that are within the dwelling unit.

3. Electric Code. The provisions of this code shall apply to the constructions, alteration, relocation, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal and demolition of every building or structures or any appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures.

4. Gas. The provisions of the California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4 and/or the California Plumbing Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5 shall apply to the installation of gas piping from the point of delivery, gas appliances and related accessories as covered in this code. These requirements apply to gas piping systems extending from the point of delivery to the inlet connections of appliances and the installation and operation of residential and commercial gas appliances and related accessories.

5. Mechanical. The provisions of the California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4 shall apply to the installation, alterations, repairs and replacement of mechanical systems, including equipment, appliances, fixtures, fittings and/or appurtenances, including ventilating, heating, cooling, air-conditioning and refrigeration systems, incinerators and other energy-related systems.

6. Plumbing. The provisions of the California Plumbing Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5 shall apply to the installation, alteration, repair and replacement of plumbing systems, including equipment, appliances, fixtures, fittings and appurtenances, and where connected to a water or sewage system and all aspects of a medical gas system.

The provisions of the International Private Sewage Disposal Code shall apply to private sewage disposal systems.

7. Fire Prevention. The provisions of the California Fire Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9 as amended by Eastvale Municipal Article III Chapter 3 shall apply to matters affecting or relating to structures, processes and premises from the hazard of fire and explosion arising from the storage, handling or use of structures, materials or devices; from conditions hazardous to life, property or public welfare in the occupancy of structures or premises; and from the construction, extension, repair, alteration or removal of fire suppression and alarm systems or fire hazards in the structure or on the premises from occupancy or operation.

8. Energy. The provisions of the California Energy Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6 shall apply to all matters governing the design and construction of buildings for energy efficiency.

9. Historical. The provisions of the California Historical Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 8 shall apply to the preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, relocation or reconstruction of buildings or properties designated as qualified historical buildings or properties (Chapter 8-2 of CHBC). The intent of the CHBC is to facilitate the preservation and continuing use of qualified historical buildings occupants and access for 603 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 3
persons with disabilities.

10. Existing Buildings. California Existing Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 10, as amended by this code, shall apply to the repair, alteration, change of occupancy, addition to and relocation of existing buildings.

11. Green Building. California Green Building Standards Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, as amended by this code, shall apply to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of every newly constructed building or structure, unless otherwise indicated in this code, throughout the State of California. It is not the intent that this code substitute or be identified as meeting the certification requirements of any green building program.

12. Referenced Standards. California Referenced Standards Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 12 shall apply to recognized standards for various methods of construction, testing of materials and installations of materials and systems. 110.02.020 Applicability.

A. General. Where there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement shall apply. Where, in any specific case, different sections of this code specify different materials, methods of construction or other requirements, the most restrictive shall govern.

B. Other Laws. The provisions of this chapter shall not be deemed to nullify any provisions of local, State or federal law.

C. Application of References. References to chapter or section numbers, or to provisions not specifically identified by number, shall be construed to refer to such chapter, section or provision of this chapter.

D. Referenced Codes and Standards. The codes and standards referenced in the codes shall be considered part of the requirements listed in section 110.02.010.D to the prescribed extent of each such reference and to further regulated in sections 110.11.005.4.01 through 110.005.4.02.

1. Conflicts. Where conflicts occur between provisions listed in section 110.02.010.D and referenced codes or standards, the provisions of the code shall apply.

2. Provisions in referenced codes and standards. Where the extent of the referenced to a referenced code or standard includes subject matter that is within the scope listed in section 110.02.010.D, the provisions of section 110.02.010.D, as applicable, shall take precedence over the provisions of the referenced code or standard.

D. Partial Invalidity. If any part or provision of section 110.02.010.D is held to be illegal or void, this shall not have the effect of making void or illegal any of the other parts or provisions.

E. Existing Structures. The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall be permitted to continue without change, except as is specifically covered in section 1110.02.010.D.

1. Building not previously occupied. A building of portion of a building that has not been previously occupied or used for its intended purpose in accordance with the laws in existence at the time of its completions shall comply with the provisions of the California Building Code or California Residential Code, as applicable, for new construction or with any current permit for occupancy.

2. Building previously Occupied. The legal occupancy of any building existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as 604 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 4
otherwise specifically provided on this code, the California Fire Code or California Existing Building Code, or as is deemed necessary by the building official for general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public.

3. Additions, alterations or repairs. Additions, alterations or repairs to any structure shall conform to the requirements for a new structure without requiring the existing structure to comply with the requirements of this code, Additions, alterations, repairs and relocations shall not cause an existing structure to become unsafe or adversely affect the performance of the building.
110.02.030 Division of Building and Safety.

A. Creation of Enforcement Agency. The Division of Building Safety is hereby created and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the Building Official.

B. Appointment. The building official shall be appointed by the chief appointing authority of the jurisdiction.

C. Deputies. In accordance with the prescribed procedures of this jurisdiction and with the concurrence of the appointing authority, the Building Official shall have the authority to appoint a Deputy Building Official, related technical officers, inspectors, plan examiners and other employees. Such employees shall have powers as delegated by the Building Official. For the maintenance of existing properties, see the California Existing Building Code. 110.02.040 Duties and Powers of Building Official.

A. General. The Building Official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce the provisions listed in section 110.02.010.D. The Building Official shall have the authority to render interpretations of the codes and to adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies and procedures shall follow the intent and purpose listed in section 110.02.010.D. Such policies and procedures shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically listed in section 110.02.010.D.

B. Applications and Permits. The Building Official shall receive applications, review construction documents and issue permits for the erection, alteration, and demolition and moving of buildings and structures, inspect the premises for which such permits have been issued and enforce compliance with the provisions of the codes.

1. Determination of substantially improved of substantially damaged existing buildings and structures in flood hazard areas. For applications for reconstruction, rehabilitation, repair, alteration, addition or other improvement of existing buildings or structures located in flood hazard areas, the building official shall determine if the proposed work constitutes substantial improvement or repair of substantial damage. Where the building official determines that the proposed work constitutes substantial improvements listed in section 110.02.010.D, the building official shall require the building to meet the requirements of California Building Code section 1612 and California Residential Code section R322.

C. Notices and Orders. The Building Official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with the codes.

D Inspections. The Building Official shall make all of the required inspections, or the Building Official shall have the authority to accept reports of inspection by approved agencies or individuals. Reports of such inspections shall be in writing and be certified by a responsible officer of such approved agency or by the responsible individual. The Building Official is authorized to engage such expert opinion as deemed necessary to report upon unusual technical issues that arise, subject to the approval of the appointing authority. 605 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 5
E. The Building Official shall carry proper identification when inspecting structures or premises in the performance of duties under the California Codes listed in section 110.02.010.D.

F. Right of Entry. Where it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce the provisions of the California Codes listed in section 110.02.010.D, or where the Building Official has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in a structure or upon a premises a condition which is contrary to or in violation of the codes which makes the structure or premises unsafe, dangerous or hazardous, the Building Official is authorized to enter the structure or premises at reasonable times to inspect or to perform the duties imposed by the codes; provided, that if such structure or premises be occupied that credentials be presented to the occupant and entry requested. If such structure or premises is unoccupied, the Building Official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other person having charge or control of the structure or premises and request entry. If entry is refused, the Building Official shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry.

G Department Records. The Building Official shall keep official records of applications received, permits and certificates issued, fees collected, reports of inspections, and notices and orders issued. Such records shall be retained in the official records for the period required for retention of public records.

H. Liability. The Building Official, member of the Board of Appeals or employee charged with the enforcement of the codes, while acting for the jurisdiction in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by the California Codes listed in section 8101.4 or other pertinent law or ordinance, shall not thereby be civilly or criminally rendered liable personally and is hereby relieved from personal liability for any damage accruing to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties.

1. Legal defense. Any suit or criminal complaint instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties and under the provisions of the California Codes listed in section 110.02.010.D shall be defended by legal representative of the City until the final termination of the proceedings.

The Building Official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of the codes.

I. Approved Materials and Equipment. Materials, equipment and devices approved by the Building Official shall be constructed and installed in accordance with such approval.

1. Used Materials and Equipment. Materials that are used shall meet the requirements of California Codes listed in section 110.02.010.D for new materials. Used equipment and devices shall not be reused unless approved by the Building Official.

J. Modifications. Wherever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of the California Codes listed in section 110.02.010.D, the Building Official shall have the authority to grant modifications for individual cases, upon application of the owner or owner’s representative, provided the Building Official shall first find that special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and the modification is in compliance with the intent and purpose of the codes and that such modification does not lessen health, accessibility, life and fire safety, or structural requirements. The details of action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the department of building safety.

1. Flood hazard areas. The building official shall not grant modifications to any provision required in flood hazard areas as established by California Building Code section 1612.3 or California Residential Code section R302.2(1) unless a determination has been made that:
i. A showing of good and sufficient cause that the unique characteristics of the size, configuration or topography of the site render the elevation standards of California 606
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 6
Building Code section 1612 or California Residential Code section R322inappropriate.
ii. A determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship by rendering the lot undevelopable.
iii. A determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict existing laws or ordinances. iv. A determination that the variance is the minimum necessary to afford relief, considering the flood hazard.
v. Submission to the applicant of written notice specifying the difference between the design flood elevation and elevation to which the building is to be commensurate with the increased risk result from the reduced floor elevation, and stating that construction below the design flood elevation increases risks to life and property.

K. Alternative Materials, Design and Methods of Construction and Equipment.The provisions of the codes are not intended to prevent the installation of any material or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code; provided, that any such alternative has been approved. An alternative material, design or method of construction shall be approved where the Building Official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the provisions of the codes, and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the codes in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety.

L. Research Reports. Supporting data, where necessary to assist in the approval of materials or assemblies not specifically provided for in the codes, shall consist of valid research reports from approved sources.

M. Tests. Whenever there is insufficient evidence of compliance with the provisions of the codes, or evidence that a material or method does not conform to the requirements of this code, or in order to substantiate claims for alternative materials or methods, the Building Official shall have the authority to require tests as evidence of compliance to be made at no expense to the City. Test methods shall be as specified in the codes or by other recognized test standards. In the absence of recognized and accepted test methods, the Building Official shall approve the testing procedures. Tests shall be performed by an approved agency. Reports of such tests shall be retained by the Building Official for the period required for retention of public records. 110.02.050 Permits.

A. Required. Any owner or authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, demolish, or change the occupancy of a building or structure, or to erect, install, enlarge, alter, repair, remove, convert or replace any electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system, the installation of which is regulated by the codes, or to cause any such work to be done, shall first make application to the Building Official and obtain the required permit.

B. Work Exempt from Permit. Exemptions from permit requirements of the codes shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. Permits shall not be required for the following:

Building:

1. One (1) story detached accessory structures, provided that the floor area does not exceed one hundred twenty (120) square feet (eleven (11) m2. 607
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 7

2. Fences not over seven (7’) feet (two thousand and thirty four` (2134) mm) high measured from the top fence to lowest finished grade.

3. Masonry Block Walls three (3’) feet (nine hundred and fourteen (914) mm) high measured from the top masonry block walls to the lowest finished grade.

4. Oil derricks.

4. Retaining walls that are not over four (4') feet (one thousand two hundred nineteen (1,219) mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or IIIA liquids.

5. Water tanks supported directly on grade if the capacity does not exceed five thousand (5,000) gallons (eighteen thousand nine hundred twenty-five (18,925) L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one (1).

6. Sidewalks and Driveway.

7. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work.

8. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery.

9. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R-3 occupancy or a one (1) or two (2) family dwelling, that are less than twenty-four (24") inches (six hundred ten (610) mm) deep and are installed entirely above ground.

10. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including service systems.

11. Swings, other playground equipment and tree houses accessory to detached one (1) and two (2) family dwellings.

12. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than fifty-four (54") inches (one thousand three hundred seventy-two (1,372) mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support of Group R-3 occupancies, a one (1) or two (2) family dwelling, and Group U occupancies.

13. Replacement, repair or overlay of one hundred (100) square feet or less of an existing roof covering within any twelve (12) month period on the same building.

14. Nonfixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters and partitions five feet nine inches (5'9") or less (one thousand seven hundred fifty-three (1,753) mm) in height.

Electrical:

1. Listed cord-and-plug connected temporary decorative lighting.

2. Reinstallations of attachment plug receptacles but not the outlets therefor.

3. Replacement of branch circuit over current devices of the required capacity in the same location.

4. Electrical wiring, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment operating at less than twenty-five (25) volts and not capable of supplying more than fifty (50) watts of energy.

5. Minor repair work, including the replacement of lamps or the connection of approved portable electrical equipment to approved permanently installed receptacles.

6. Installation or maintenance of communications wiring, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment.

7. A permit shall not be required for the installation of any temporary system required for the testing or servicing of electrical equipment or apparatus.

8. Installations of railways for generation, transformation, transmission, energy storage, or distribution of power used exclusively for signaling and communications purpose.

9. Installations of communications equipment under the exclusive control of 608 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 8
communications utilities located outdoors or in building spaces used exclusively for such installation.

10. Installation under the exclusive control of an electric utility here such installations a. Consist of service drops or service laterals and associated metering, or b. Are on property owned or leased by electric utility for the propose of communications, metering, generation, transformation, transmission, energy storage, or distribution of electric energy, or
c. Are located in legally established easements or rights-of-ways, or d. Are located by other written agreement either designated by or recognized by public service commissions, utility commissions, or other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction for such installations. Theses written agreements shall be limited to installations for the purpose of communications, metering, generation, transformation, transmission, energy storage, or distribution of electric energy where legally established easements or rights-of-way cannot be obtained.

Gas:

1. Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances.

2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe.

3. Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid.

Mechanical:

1. Portable heating appliance, portable ventilation equipment, portable cooling unit, or portable evaporative cooler.

2. A closed system of steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by California Mechanical Code.
3 Replacement of any component part that does not alter its original and is in accordance with other applicable requirements of California Mechanical Code.

4. Replacement equipment that is part of the equipment for which a permit has been issued pursuant to the requirements of the California Mechanical Code.

5. A unit refrigerating system.

Plumbing.

1. The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe; provided, however, that if any concealed trap, drain pipe, water, soil, waste or vent pipe becomes defective and it becomes necessary to remove and replace the same with the new material, such work shall be considered as new work and a permit shall be obtained and inspection made as provided in this code.

2. The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures and the removal and reinstallation of water closets, provided such repairs do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures.

C. Emergency Repairs. Where equipment replacements and repairs must be performed in an emergency situation, the permit application shall be submitted within the next working business day to the Building Official.

D. Public Service Agencies. A permit shall not be required for the installation, alteration or repair of generation, transmission, distribution or metering or other related equipment that is under the ownership and control of public service agencies by established right.

E. Application for Permit. To obtain a permit, the applicant shall first file an application 609 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 9
therefor in writing on a form furnished by the Department of Building Safety for that purpose.

Such application shall:

1. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit for which application is made.

2. Describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done by legal description, street address or similar description that will readily identify and definitely locate the proposed building or work.

3. Indicate the use and occupancy for which the proposed work is intended.

4. Be accompanied by construction documents and other information as required in Section 110.02.010.

5. State the valuation of the proposed work.

6. Be signed by the applicant, or the applicant’s authorized agent.

7. Give such other data and information as required by the Building Official.

F. Action on Application. The Building Official shall examine or cause to be examined applications for permits and amendments thereto within a reasonable time after filing. If the application or the construction documents do not conform to the requirements of pertinent laws, the Building Official shall reject such application in writing, stating the reasons therefor.

If the Building Official is satisfied that the proposed work conforms to the requirements of the codes, laws and ordinances applicable thereto, the Building Official shall issue a permit therefor as soon as practicable.

G. Limitation of Application. An application for a permit for any proposed work shall be deemed to have been abandoned one hundred and eighty (180) days after the date of filing, unless such application has been pursed in good faith or a permit has been issued: except the Building Official is authorized to grant one (1) extension of time for additional periods not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. An application shall not be extended if this chapter or any other pertinent laws or ordinances have been amended subsequent to the date of application. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee.

H. Application for demolition. To obtain a permit, the applicant shall first file an application therefor in writing on a form furnished by the Department of Building Safety for that purpose. Such application shall:

1. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit for which application is made.

3. Indicate the use and occupancy for the structure on the site or parcel.

4. The site plan shall show construction to be demolished and the location and size of existing structures and construction that are to remain on the site or parcel.

6. State the valuation of the proposed work.

7. Be signed by the applicant, or the applicant’s authorized agent. 610
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 10

8. Give such other data and information as required by the Building Official.

9. The dates upon which demolition will begin, and the length of time the demolition activity will occur.

I. Action on Application. The Building Official shall examine or cause to be examined applications for permits and amendments thereto within a reasonable time after filing. If the application or the construction documents do not conform to the requirements of pertinent laws, the Building Official shall reject such application in writing, stating the reasons therefor.

J. Time Limitation of Application. An application for a permit for any proposed work shall be deemed to have been abandoned one hundred and eighty (180) days after the date of filing, unless such application has been pursed in good faith or a permit has been issued:
except the Building Official is authorized to grant one (1) extension of time for additional periods not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. An application shall not be extended if this chapter or any other pertinent laws or ordinances have been amended subsequent to the date of application. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee.

K. Validity of Permit. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the City. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the City shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shall not prevent the Building Official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data.

The Building Official is also authorized to prevent occupancy or use of a structure where in violation of this code or of any other ordinances of the City.

L. Expiration. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within twelve (12) months after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is abandoned for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after the time the work is commenced. The Building Official is authorized to grant, in writing, up to one (1) extensions of time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days each time upon payment of appropriate fees and a written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken.

Time limitation for permit as the result of code enforcement action shall expire by limitation and become null-and-void sixty (60) days after the date on which the permit is issued. The Building Official is authorized to grant, in writing, up to one (1) extensions of time for action by the permittee for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days each time upon payment of appropriate fees and a written request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken.

M. Suspension or Revocation. The Building Official is authorized to suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of the codes wherever the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect, inaccurate or incomplete information, or in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions listed in section 110.02.010 D 1 – 110.02.010 D 12.

N. Placement of Permit. The building permit or copy shall be kept on the site of the work until the completion of the project.
110.02.060 Floor and Roof Design Loads. 611
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 11
A. Live Loads Posted. Where the live loads for which each floor or portion thereof of a commercial or industrial building are or have been designed to exceed fifty (50) psf (two and four-tenths (2.40) kN/m2), such design live loads shall be conspicuously posted by the owner in that part of each story in which they apply, using durable signs. It shall be unlawful to remove or deface such notices.

B. Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. A certificate of occupancy required by section 110.02.120 shall not be issued until the floor load signs, required by section 110.02.060, have been installed.

C. Restrictions on Loading. It shall be unlawful to place, or cause or permit to be placed, on any floor or roof of a building, structure or portion thereof a load greater than is permitted by this code.
110.02.070 Submittal Documents.

A. Submittal documents consisting of construction documents, statements of special inspections, geotechnical report and other data shall be submitted in two (2) or more sets with each permit application. The construction documents shall be prepared by a registered design professional unless exempted by Section 5537 of the Business and Professions Code. Where special conditions exist, the Building Official is authorized to require additional construction documents to be prepared by a registered design professional.

Exception: The Building Official is authorized to waive the submission of construction documents and other data not required to be prepared by a registered design professional if it is found that the nature of the work applied for is such that review of construction documents is not necessary to obtain compliance with this code.

B. Construction Documents. Construction documents shall be in accordance with Sections 110.02.070 B 1 through 110.02.070 B 9.

1. Information on Construction Documents. Construction documents shall be dimensioned and drawn upon suitable material. Electronic media documents are permitted to be submitted when approved by the Building Official. Construction documents shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of this code and relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, as determined by the Building Official.

2. Fire Protection System Shop Drawings. Shop drawings for the fire protection system(s) shall be submitted to Fire Department indicate conformance to this California Building Code, California Fire Code and the construction documents and shall be approved prior to the start of system installation. Shop drawings shall contain all information as required by the referenced installation standards in California Building Code and California Fire Code.

3. Means of Egress. The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress in compliance with the provisions of this code. In other than occupancies in Groups R-2, R- 3, and I-1, the construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces.

4. Exterior Wall Envelope. Construction documents for all buildings shall describe the exterior wall envelope in sufficient detail to determine compliance with this code. The construction documents shall provide details of the exterior wall envelope as required, including flashing, intersections with dissimilar materials, corners, end details, control joints, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive 612
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 12
membrane and details around openings. The construction documents shall include manufacturer’s installation instructions that provide supporting documentation that the proposed penetration and opening details described in the construction documents maintain the weather resistance of the exterior wall envelope. The supporting documentation shall fully describe the exterior wall system which was tested, where applicable, as well as the test procedure used.

5. Exterior Balconies and elevated walking surfaces. Where balconies and elevated walking surfaces are exposed to water from direct or blowing rain or irrigation, and the structural framing is protected by an impervious moisture barrier, the contraction documents shall include details for all elements of the impervious moisture barrier system. The construction documents shall include the manufacturer’s installation instructions.

6. Site Plan. The construction documents submitted with the application for permit shall be accompanied by a site plan showing to scale the size and location of new construction and existing structures on the site, distances from lot lines, the established street grades and the proposed finished grades and, as applicable, flood hazard areas, floodways, and design flood elevations; and it shall be drawn in accordance with an accurate boundary line survey. The Building Official is authorized to waive or modify the requirement for a site plan when the application for permit is for alteration or repair or when otherwise warranted.

7. Design flood elevations. Where design flood elevations are not specified, they shall be established in accordance with California Building Code section 1612.3.1 or California Residential Code R301.2(1) and R322.

8. Structural Information. The construction documents shall provide the information specified in California Building Code Section 1603 or for buildings and structures utilizing braced wall design, and where required by the building official, braced wall lines shall be identified on the construction documents. Pertinent information including, but not limited to, bracing methods, location and length of braced wall panels and foundation requirements of braced wall panels at top bottom shall be provided.

9. Relocatable buildings. Construction documents for relocatable buildings shall comply with California Building Code section 3112.

C. Examination of Documents. The Building Official shall examine or cause to be examined the accompanying submittal documents and shall ascertain by such examinations whether the construction indicated and described is in accordance with the requirements of the codes and other pertinent laws or ordinances.

1. Approval of Construction Documents. When the Building Official issues a permit, the construction documents shall be approved, in writing or by stamp, as “Approved or Reviewed for Code Compliance.” One (1) set of construction documents so reviewed shall be retained by the Building Official. The other set shall be returned to the applicant, shall be kept at the site of work and shall be open to inspection by the Building Official or a duly authorized representative.

2. Previous Approvals. The Codes listed in Section 110.02.010.D shall not require changes in the construction documents, construction or designated occupancy of a structure for which a lawful permit has been heretofore issued or otherwise lawfully authorized, and the construction of which complies with the codes and ordinances adopted by the jurisdiction at the time the permit was issued and has been pursued in good faith within one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date of this code and has not been abandoned.
613
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 13

3. Phased Approval. The Building Official is authorized to issue a permit for the construction of foundations or any other part of a building or structure before the construction documents for the whole building or structure have been submitted; provided, that adequate information and detailed statements have been filed complying with pertinent requirements of the Codes listed in Section 110.02.010.D. The holder of such permit for the foundation or other parts of a building or structure shall proceed at the holder’s own risk with the building operation and without assurance that a permit for the entire structure will be granted. All proposed phased projects shall be subject to additional examination, approval and inspection fees.

4. Design Professional in Responsible Charge. When it is required that documents be prepared by a registered design professional, the Building Official shall be authorized to require the owner or the owner’s authorized agent to engage and designate on the building permit application a registered design professional who shall act as the registered design professional in responsible charge. If the circumstances require, the owner or the owner’s authorized agent shall designate a substitute registered design professional in charge who shall perform duties required of the original registered design professional in charge. The Building Official shall be notified in writing by the owner or the owner’s authorized agent if the registered design professional in responsible charge is changed or is unable to continue to perform the duties.

The registered design professional in responsible charge shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating submittal documents prepared by others, including phased and deferred submittal items, for compatibility with the design of the building. i. Deferred Submittals. For the purposes of this section, “deferred submittals” are defined as those portions of the design that are not submitted at the time of the application and that are to be submitted to the Building Official within a specified period. Deferral of any submittal items shall have the prior approval of the Building Official.

The registered design professional in responsible charge shall list the deferred submittals on the construction documents for review by the Building Official.

Documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the registered design professional in responsible charge who shall review them and forward them to the Building Official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and been found to be in general conformance to the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall not be installed until the deferred submittal documents have been approved by the Building Official.

D. Amended Construction Documents. Work shall be installed in accordance with the approved construction documents, and any changes made during construction that are not in compliance with the approved construction documents shall be resubmitted for approval as an amended set of construction documents. The amended construction documents shall be submitted, reviewed and approved and fees paid before scheduling inspection of that portion of the amended work.

E. Retention of Construction Documents. One (1) set of approved construction documents shall be retained by the Building Official for a period of not less than one hundred eighty (180) days from date of completion of the permitted work, or as required by State or local laws.
110.02.080 Temporary Structures and Uses.

A. General. The Building Official is authorized to issue a permit for temporary structures and temporary uses. Such permits shall be limited as to time of service, but shall not be 614
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 14
permitted for more than one hundred eighty (180) days. The Building Official is authorized to grant extensions for demonstrated cause.

B. Conformance . Temporary structures and uses shall conform to the structural strength, fire safety, means of egress, accessibility, light, ventilation and sanitary requirements of the codes as necessary to ensure public health, safety and general welfare, and shall comply with the requirements of California Building Code Section 3103.

C. Temporary Power. The Building Official is authorized to give permission to temporarily supply and use power in part of an electric installation before such installation has been fully completed and the final certificate of completion has been issued. The Building Official is authorized to terminate such use of temporary power when found to be noncompliant with codes, ordinances and regulations of the jurisdiction or is found to be unsafe. The Building Official shall issue a notice of noncompliance to the utility provider and when possible to the owner or owner’s authorized representative and the building occupant, when termination of temporary power is necessary. The part covered by the temporary certificate shall comply with the requirements specified for temporary lighting, heat or power in California Electric Code.

D. Termination of Approval. The Building Official is authorized to terminate such permit for a temporary structure or use and to order the temporary structure or use to be discontinued.
110.02.090 Fees.

A. Payment of Fees . A permit shall not be valid until the fees prescribed as set forth in the City of Eastvale Schedule of Fees have been paid, nor shall an amendment to a permit be released until the additional fee, if any, has been paid.

B. Schedule of Fees. On buildings, structures, electrical, gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with the Schedule of Fees established by resolution of the City Council.

C. Building Permit Valuation. The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated permit value at time of application. Permit valuations shall include total value of work, including materials and labor, for which the permit is being issued, such as electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and permanent systems. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the Building Official. Final building permit valuation shall be set by the Building Official.

D. Work Commencing Before Permit Issuance. Any person who commences any work on a building, structure, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to an investigation fee to be made before any permit may be issued for such work. An investigation fee in addition to the permit fee shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued for the illegal work. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of a permit fee required by this chapter for the commenced or completed work as set forth in the City adopted fee schedule. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this title, nor from any penalty prescribed by law.

E. Related Fees. The payment of the fee for the construction, alteration, removal or demolition for work done in connection to or concurrently with the work authorized by a building permit shall not relieve the applicant or holder of the permit from the payment of other fees that are prescribed by law.
615
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 15
110.02.100 Refunds.

A. The Building Official may authorize the refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected.

B. The Building Official may authorize the refunding of not more than eighty (80%) percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this title. The Building Official may authorize the refunding of not more than eighty (80%) percent of the plan review fee paid when an application is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing has been started.

C. The Building Official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of fee payment.
110.02.110 Inspections.

A. General. Construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the Building Official and such construction or work shall visible and remain accessed for inspection purposes until approved. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of the Codes listed in Section 110.02.010.D or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Inspections presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. It shall be the duty of the owner or the owner’s authorized agent to cause the work to remain visible and able to be accessed for inspection purposes.

Neither the Building Official nor the City shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection.

B. Preliminary Inspection. Before issuing a permit, the Building Official is authorized to examine or cause to be examined buildings, structures and sites for which an application has been filed.

C. Required Inspections . The Building Official, upon notification, shall make the inspections set forth herein.

1. Footing and Foundation Inspection. Footing and foundation inspections shall be made after excavations for footings are complete and any required reinforcing steel is in place. For concrete foundations, any required forms shall be in place prior to inspection. Materials for the foundation shall be on the job, except where concrete is ready mixed in accordance with ASTM C 94, the concrete need not be on the job.

2. Concrete Slab and Under-Floor Inspection. Concrete slab and under-floor inspections shall be made after in-slab or under-floor reinforcing steel and building service equipment, conduit, piping accessories and other ancillary equipment items are in place, but before any concrete is placed or floor sheathing installed, including the subfloor.

3. Lowest Floor Elevation. In flood hazard areas, upon placement of the lowest floor, including the basement, and prior to further vertical construction, the elevation certification required in California Building Code Section 1612.5 or California Residential Code Section R322 shall be submitted to the Building Official.

4. Frame Inspection. Framing inspections shall be made after the roof deck or sheathing, all framing, fireblocking and bracing are in place and pipes, chimneys and vents to be concealed are complete and the rough electrical, plumbing, 616 ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 16
heating wires, pipes and ducts are approved.

5. Plumbing, mechanical, gas and electrical systems inspections. Rough inspections of Plumbing, mechanical, gas and electrical systems shall be made prior to covering or concealment, before fixtures or appliances are set to be installed, and prior to inspection.

6. Lath, Gypsum Board and Gypsum Panel Product Inspection. Lath, gypsum board and gypsum panel product inspections shall be made after lathing, gypsum board and gypsum panel products, interior and exterior, are in place, but before any plastering is applied or gypsum board and gypsum panel product joints and fasteners are taped and finished.

7. Weather-exposed balcony and walking surface waterproofing. Where balconies or other elevated walking surfaces are exposed to water from direct or blowing rain or irrigation, and structural framing is protected by an impervious moisture barrier, all elements of the impervious moisture barrier system shall not be concealed until inspected and approved.

8. Fire- and Smoke-Resistant Penetrations. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire-resistance-rated assemblies, smoke barriers and smoke partitions shall not be concealed from view until inspected and approved.

9. Energy Efficiency Inspections. Inspections shall be made to determine compliance with California Energy Code and shall include, but not be limited to, inspections for: envelope insulation R- and U-values, fenestration U-value, duct system R-value, and HVAC and water-heating equipment efficiency.

10. Other Inspections. In addition to the inspections specified above, the Building Official is authorized to make or require other inspections of any construction work to ascertain compliance with the provisions of the Codes listed in Section 101.02.010.D and other laws that are enforced by the Department of Building Safety.

11. Special Inspections. For special inspections, see California Building Code Chapter 17.

12. Final Inspection. The final inspection shall be made after all work required by the building permit is completed.
i. Flood hazard documentation. If located in a flood hazard area, documentation of the elevation of the lowest floor as required in California Building Code section 1612.4 or California Residential Code Section R322 shall be submitted to the building official prior to final inspection.

D. Reinspection. A reinspection fee prescribed as below may be assessed for each inspection or reinspection when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections called for are not made.

1. E. This section is not to be interpreted as requiring reinspection fees the first time a job is rejected for failure to comply with the requirements of this title but as controlling the practice of calling for inspections before the job is ready for such inspection or reinspection.

2. F. Reinspection fees may be assessed when the inspection record card is not otherwise available on the work site; the approved plans are not readily available to the inspector, for failure to provide access on the date for which 617
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 17
inspection is requested, or for deviating from plans requiring the approval of the Building Official.

3. G. To obtain a reinspection, the applicant shall pay the reinspection fee in accordance with the City of Eastvale Schedule of Fees.

4. H. In instances where reinspection fees have been assessed, additional inspection of the work will not be performed until the required fees have been paid.

I. Inspection Agencies. The Building Official is authorized to accept reports of approved inspection agencies, provided such agencies satisfy the requirements as to qualifications and reliability.

J. Inspection Requests. It shall be the duty of the holder of the building permit or their duly authorized agent to notify the Building Official at least one (1) working day before such inspection is desired and work is ready for inspection. It shall be the duty of the permit holder or their duly authorized agent to provide access to and means for inspections of such work that are required by this code. The Building Official may require that every request for inspection be filed in writing, by telephone or by building division web site at the option of the Building Official.

K. Approval Required. Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated in each successive inspection without first obtaining the approval of the Building Official. The Building Official, upon notification, shall make the requested inspections and shall either indicate the portion of the construction that is satisfactory as completed, or notify the permit holder or his or her agent wherein the same fails to comply with this code. Any portions that do not comply shall be corrected and such portion shall not be covered or concealed until authorized by the Building Official.
110.02.120 Certificate of Occupancy.

A. Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing use or occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made, until the Building Official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction.

Exception:

1. Certificates of occupancy are not required for work exempt from permits under Section 110.02.050 B.

2. Accessory buildings and structures classified as U occupancy.

3. All R-3 occupancies.

B. Certificate Issued. After the Building Official inspects the building or structure and finds no violations of the provisions of this code or other laws that are enforced by the Department of Building Safety, the Building Official shall issue a certificate of occupancy that contains the following:

1. The building permit number.

2. The address of the structure.

3. The name and address of the owner.

4. A description of that portion of the structure for which the certificate is issued.

5. A statement that the described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.

6. The name of the Building Official.
618
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 18

7. The edition of the code under which the permit was issued.

8. The use and occupancy, in accordance with the provisions of California Building Code Chapter 3.

9. The type of construction as defined in California Building Code Chapter 6.

10. The design occupant load.

11. If an automatic sprinkler system is provided, whether the sprinkler system is required.

12. Any special stipulations and conditions of the building permit.

C. Temporary Occupancy. The Building Official is authorized to issue a temporary certificate of occupancy before the completion of the entire work covered by the permit; provided, that such portion or portions shall be occupied safely. The Building Official shall set a time period during which the temporary certificate of occupancy is valid. A fee for processing and tracking the temporary certificate of occupancy shall be paid by the building owner or the owner’s authorized agent before the temporary certificate of occupancy is issued.

D. Revocation. The Building Official is authorized to, in writing, suspend or revoke a certificate of occupancy or completion issued under the provisions of this code wherever the certificate is issued in error, or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or where it is determined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of the codes.
110.02.130 Service Utilities.

A. Connection of Service Utilities. No person shall make connections from a utility, source of energy, fuel or power to any building or system that is regulated by this code for which a permit is required, until released by the Building Official.

B. Temporary Connection. The Building Official shall have the authority to authorize the temporary connection of the building or system to the utility source of energy, fuel or power.

C. Authority to Disconnect Service Utilities. The Building Official shall have the authority to authorize disconnection of utility service to the building, structure or system regulated by this code and the referenced codes and standards set forth in Section 110.02.010.D in case of emergency, where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to life or property or when such utility connection has been made without the approval required by Section 110.02.130.

The Building Official shall notify the serving utility, and wherever possible the owner and occupant of the building, structure or service system, of the decision to disconnect prior to taking such action. If not notified prior to disconnecting, the owner or occupant of the building, structure or service system shall be notified in writing, as soon as practical thereafter.
110.02.140 Violations.

A. Unlawful Acts. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, alter, extend, repair, move, remove, demolish or occupy any building, structure or equipment regulated by Codes listed in Section 110.02.010.D, or cause same to be done, in conflict with or in violation of any of the provisions of this title.

B. Notice of Violation. The Building Official is authorized to serve a notice of violation or order on the person responsible for the erection, construction, alteration, extension, repair, moving, removal, demolition or occupancy of a building or structure in violation of the provisions of this code, or in violation of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of the codes. Such order shall direct the discontinuance of the illegal action or condition and the abatement of the violation.
619
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 19
C. Prosecution of Violation. If the notice of violation is not complied with promptly, the Building Official is authorized to request the City Attorney to institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the building or structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of the order or direction made pursuant thereto.

D. Violation—Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this code or fails to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who erects, constructs, alters or repairs a building or structure in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Building Official, or of a permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be subject to penalties as prescribed by law. The payment of citations or penalties shall not be exempt from compliance with this title.

No person shall own, use, occupy, or maintain an unpermitted structure or system. For purposes of this Chapter, “unpermitted structure or system” shall be defined as any building or structure, electrical system, plumbing system, or mechanical system or portion thereof, that was erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, connected, converted, demolished, or equipped, at any point in time by any person, without the required permit(s) having first been obtained from the Building Official or with a valid permit as issued by the Building Official which subsequently expired and became null-and-void. 110.02.150 Stop Work Order.

A. Authority. Whenever the Building Official finds any work regulated by provisions of this title being performed in a manner either contrary to the provisions of this title or dangerous or unsafe, the Building Official is authorized to issue a stop work order.

B. Issuance. The stop work order shall be in writing and shall be given to the owner of the property involved, or to the owner’s authorized agent, or to the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work shall immediately cease. The stop work order shall state the reason for the order, and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resume.

C. Unlawful Continuance. Any person who shall continue any work after having been served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be subject to penalties as prescribed by law. 110.02.160 Unsafe Structures and Equipment.

A. Conditions. Structures or existing equipment that are or hereafter become unsafe, insanitary or deficient because of inadequate means of egress, facilities, inadequate light and ventilation, or which constitute a fire hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to human life or the public welfare, or that involve illegal or improper occupancy or inadequate maintenance, shall be deemed an unsafe condition. Unsafe structures shall be taken down and removed or made safe, as the Building Official deems necessary and as provided for in this section. A vacant structure that is not secured against entry shall be deemed unsafe.

B. Record. The Building Official shall cause a report to be filed on an unsafe condition. The report shall state the occupancy of the structure and the nature of the unsafe condition.

C. Notice. If an unsafe condition is found, the Building Official shall serve on the owner, agent or person in control of the structure a written notice that describes the condition deemed unsafe and specifies the required repairs or improvements to be made to abate the unsafe condition, or that requires the unsafe structure to be demolished within a stipulated time. Such notice shall require the person thus notified to declare immediately to the 620
ORDINANCE NO. 23-
PAGE 20
Building Official acceptance or rejection of the terms of the order.

D. Method of Service. Such notice shall be deemed properly served if a copy thereof is (1) delivered to the owner personally; (2) sent by certified or registered mail addressed to the owner at the last known address with the return receipt requested; or (3) delivered in any other manner as prescribed by law. If the certified or registered letter is returned showing that the letter was not delivered, a copy thereof shall be posted in a conspicuous place in or about the structure affected by such notice. Service of such notice in the foregoing manner upon the owner’s agent or upon the person responsible for the structure shall constitute service of notice upon the owner.

E. Restoration. The structure or equipment determined to be unsafe by the Building Official is permitted to be restored to a safe condition. To the extent that repairs, alterations or additions are made or a change of occupancy occurs during the restoration of the structure, such repairs, alterations, additions or change of occupancy shall comply with the requirements of the California Existing Building Code.” SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file a Notice of Exemption with the Clerk of Riverside County within five (5) days of the adoption of this Ordinance.

Eastvale City CouncilJanuary 11, 2023

Eastvale City Council
January 11, 2023