Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516
Annual Report For: Fiscal Year 2025/26
Benefit Assessment District 2014-2
May 2025
1255
CITY OF EASTVALE
12363 Limonite Ave, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Phone: 951-361-0900
CITY COUNCIL
Mike McMinn, Mayor
Jocelyn Yow, Mayor Pro Tem
Todd Rigby, Council Member
Christian Dinco, Council Member
Clint Lorimore, Council Member
CITY STAFF
Mark Orme, City Manager
Erica L. Vega, City Attorney
Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
NBS
Corina Chavez, Analyst
Amanda Welker, Project Manager
Adina McCargo, Client Services Director
1256
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1
2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Reason for Assessment ........................................................................................... 2
2.2 Process for Annual Assessment .............................................................................. 2
2.3 Same or Lesser Assessment .................................................................................... 2
2.4 Fiscal Year 2025/26 Assessment ............................................................................. 2
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................................... 3
3.1 Description of Improvements ................................................................................. 3
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS ....................................................................................................... 4
4.1 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 ........................................................................ 4
4.2 Definition of Budget Items ...................................................................................... 6
5. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 8
5.1 Legal Considerations ............................................................................................... 8
5.2 Special Benefit ......................................................................................................... 9
5.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 10
5.4 General and Special Benefits Separated ............................................................... 10
5.5 Method of Assessment Spread ............................................................................. 12
6. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM .................................................................................. A APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL .......................................................................................... B
1257
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 1
1. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
On March 26, 2025, the City Council of the City of Eastvale (the “City”), under the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (the “1982 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 25-13, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments and Ordering the Preparation of an Annual Report for Benefit Assessment District No. 2014-2 (the “District”) (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1) for Fiscal Year 2025/26.
The Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26 pursuant to the requirements of the 1982 Act. The Annual Report presents the plans and specifications for the maintenance and operation of authorized services, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance and operation of the authorized services, an assessment diagram, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance and operation of the authorized services for the referenced fiscal year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels in the District in proportion to the special benefit received.
The following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property in the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment for the District.
Benefit Assessment District 2014-2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Maintenance, Operation, and Servicing Costs $7,451.66
Incidental Expenses 3,640.30
Other Costs/Contributions (6,054.47)
Total Net Amount to be Assessed $5,037.49
Total Number of Benefit Points to be Assessed 1,750
Actual Assessment per Benefit Point (1) $2.87
Maximum Allowable Assessment per Benefit $3.46
(1) The unrounded assessment per benefit point is $2.87856. 1258
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 2
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Reason for Assessment
Approval of the assessment covered by this Annual Report will generate the revenue necessary to provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Annual Report.
2.2 Process for Annual Assessment
On an annual basis, a report is prepared which contains a description of the services proposed to be financed, a description of each lot or parcel subject to the assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, and the basis and schedule of assessment.
2.3 Same or Lesser Assessment
If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk will give notice by causing the Resolution of Intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest will contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course of, or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the District, and the proposed diagram for the proposed assessment.
2.4 Fiscal Year 2025/26 Assessment
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 assessments described in this Annual Report are not proposed to exceed the previously approved maximum assessment range formula that was approved at the time the District was formed. No land is proposed to be annexed to the District. There are no proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements.
The net amount to be assessed in the District upon all assessable lots or parcels, as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County of Riverside (the “County”) Assessor’s Office, is shown on the Assessment Roll in Appendix B of this report.
1259
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 3
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides funding for the administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing of various improvements located in District.
3.1 Description of Improvements
The traffic signal to be operated and maintained is at the following location:
Limonite Avenue & Scholar Way
The fossil filters to be managed and maintained are at the following locations:
Seven along Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Primrose Road One on 58th Street west of Scholar Way
1260
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 4
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing the improvements, as described in the Plans and Specifications for the District, are summarized below:
4.1 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2
4.1.1 ANNUAL BUDGET
The estimated costs associated with the District are shown below:
BAD 2014-2 Costs
Estimated
2025/26 Costs
Maintenance, Operation and Servicing Costs
Traffic Signal $5,651.66
Fossil Filters 1,800.00
Subtotal Maintenance, Operation and Servicing Costs $7,451.66 Incidental Expenses
Annual Administration (City) $558.00
Annual Administration (Consultant) 2,869.07
County Collection Fees 213.23
Subtotal Incidental Expenses $3,640.30
Total BAD 2014-2 Costs $11,091.96
General Benefit Contribution ($6,054.47)
Operating Reserve Contribution 0.00
Operating Reserve Collection 0.00
Contribution From Other Sources 0.00
Total Costs to be Assessed $5,037.49
Total Net BAD 2014-2 Assessment (1) $5,037.49
Total BAD 2014-2 Benefit Points to be Assessed 1,750
Actual Assessment per Benefit Point – Fiscal Year 2025/26 (2) $2.87
Maximum Allowable Assessment per Benefit Point –
Fiscal Year 2025/26 $3.46
(1) Actual assessments may be rounded to the nearest even cent in accordance with the requirements of the County for placement on the tax rolls. (2) The unrounded assessment per benefit point is $2.87856. 1261
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 5
4.1.2 OPERATING RESERVE
It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:
Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/25 Operating Reserve Cash Balance (1)
$16,504.93
Estimated Operating Expenses – Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimated Operating Collection – Fiscal Year 2025/26 (11,091.96) 5,037.49 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/26 Operating Reserve Cash Balance
$10,450.45
(1) The City will be conducting an internal audit; fund balances will be updated when the reconciliation takes place.
The estimated Fiscal Year ending 6/30/25 Operating Reserve Cash balance is estimated based on the available cash balance, less actual expenses to date, and less estimated expenses through the end of the Fiscal Year.
4.1.3 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT INCREASE
The maximum allowable assessment per Benefit Point listed in the annual budget is the amount which was approved at the time of formation of the District, with the allowable annual increase over the maximum assessment for the previous year. The allowable annual increase is defined as: “the greater of two percent (2.0%) or the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U adjustment will be based on the increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index for March of 2015.” Previously, the Los Angeles-RiversideOrange County index was made up of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties. The BLS split this index into two areas; one that represents Los Angeles and Orange counties (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim) and another that represents Riverside and San Bernardino counties (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario). Beginning with the 2018/19 calculation, the City began using the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario CPI as of March for the purposes of computing annual changes in the assessment rates for the District.
Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the cost estimate and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Benefit Point will be based on the estimated costs, available fund balance, and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and operational condition. The actual assessment amount may be equal to or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. 1262
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 6
4.2 Definition of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the cost estimate for the District:
4.2.1 MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND SERVICING COSTS
Energy Costs for Streetlights: This item includes the cost of energy provided by the electric utility provider.
Fossil Filters: This item includes the cost of cleaning and furnishing services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of the fossil filters and appurtenances, including repair, replacement, removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
Field Inspection/Management: This item includes the cost of inspecting fossil filters, reporting, and compliance with applicable regulations.
Repair/Replacement: This item includes the cost of furnishing services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of the fossil filters and appurtenances, including repair and replacement.
Traffic Signals: This item includes the cost of furnishing services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of traffic signals and appurtenances, including repair and replacement.
4.2.2 INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Annual Administration (City): This item includes the cost to departments and staff of the City for providing the administration, coordination, and management of District services, operation, and expenses. This item also includes management of the annual process including reports, resolutions, and public inquiries.
Annual Administration (Consultant): This item includes the contract fees and allowable expenses for annual administration of the District, including preparation of the Annual Report, preparation of resolutions, submittal of the levy to the County, responding to public inquiries, attendance at various meetings, and delinquency management. The contract fee is subject to a cost-of-living increase annually.
County Collection Fees: This item includes the fees charged by the County to process the levy submittal and collect and distribute funds on behalf of the City.
4.2.3 OPERATING RESERVE AND OTHER SOURCES
Operating Reserve Contribution: This item includes the amount to be credited to the annual assessment. When the Operating Reserve balance is greater than approximately one half of the annual costs, an Operating Reserve Contribution may be credited to the total costs.
Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 1263
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 7 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Operating Reserve collection may continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs.
Contributions From Other Sources: This item includes any amount contributed to the District from any source of funds other than the annual assessments.
Rounding Adjustment: This item includes any amount necessary to round the actual assessment amount for each parcel to an even cent, as the County requires that the total levy amount submitted be even, so that the amount can be divided into two equal installments on the tax roll. 1264
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 8
5. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
5.1 Legal Considerations
5.1.1 PROPOSITION 218
Proposition 218, the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” was approved by California voters in 1996, which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California State Constitution. The primary results of Proposition 218 were stricter definitions of assessments, special taxes, fees, and charges, and a general mandate for some type of voter approval for any new or increased tax, assessment, or property-related fee. The Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (the “Implementation Act”) was approved July 1, 1997.
The Implementation Act provided direction for procedures throughout the notice, protest, and hearing process. It should be noted that this report has been prepared to be consistent with current practices and the California State Constitution.
Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.
The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218 requires the Engineer to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed.
5.1.2 1982 ACT
Pursuant to the 1982 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1982 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public services which include the maintenance and operation costs of drainage, flood control street lighting, and streets.
Section 54711 of the 1982 Act requires that benefit assessments must be related to the benefit to the parcel.
This Section states:
“The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service.”
“The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service…”
“The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied.” 1265
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 9
5.2 Special Benefit
Pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution, Section 2(i) “Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute special benefit.” All parcels that have special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the services and activities provided shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire cost of the services and activities.
In accordance with Article XIII D §4(a), “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
The maintenance and servicing of the District improvements (which are described in the Plans and Specifications Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties in the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels in the District, respectively. A description of the special benefit conferred to property in the District has been excerpted from the formation Engineer’s Report and provided below:
5.2.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Traffic signals allow for the orderly flow of traffic for all roadway users and provide for increased safety of vehicles, their passengers and pedestrians. Conversely, a lack of traffic signalization can lead to roadway congestion and decreased safety. When evaluating safety of an intersection, one must look holistically at all system users to evaluate the benefit conveyed. Further, the task of traveling on the roadway system, whether by vehicle, by foot or by bicycle, involves searching for, finding, understanding, and applying the information, as well as reacting to unanticipated information. Once found and understood, the relevance of this information must be evaluated, decisions made and actions taken in response. This activity is cyclical, often occurring many times per second in complex, demanding environments. Traffic signals are one of the many pieces of information that must be processed as a traveler approaches an intersection in the roadway system.
Increased Safety to Motorists: Traffic signals provide for the orderly movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic at roadway intersections. While traffic signals cannot eliminate collisions, their installation has been shown to reduce the frequency of right-angle vehicle collisions, left-turn collisions, pedestrian collisions, and head-on collisions. Heavy traffic is interrupted to allow other vehicular traffic to pass through in a safe manner.
Increased Safety to Pedestrians: Traffic signals prioritize movement across and through an intersection. By allowing pedestrians the right-of-way to enter and cross the roadway, traffic signals increase the safety to pedestrians.
Increased Traffic Capacity and Efficiency: Use of properly timed traffic signals that smooth the traffic flow allow for increased vehicle traffic and reduce congestion. Ingress and egress from developments is more timely and efficient when traffic signals are installed. 1266
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 10
5.2.2 FOSSIL FILTER MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE Fossil filters are designed to remove petroleum hydrocarbons from stormwater runoff that enters catch basins. Petroleum hydrocarbons are a primary energy source, utilized as combustible fuel. Petroleum hydrocarbons are also found in their solid form in asphalt used in roadway construction. Petroleum hydrocarbons are pollutants which are required to be removed from stormwater and runoff before they can be released into the environment. Properly operating fossil filtration systems provide the following special benefits to property:
Pretreatment of Local Drainage Stormwater: Fossil filters pretreat stormwater by removing pollutants as the water flows through the filter into the storm sewer system. Vehicles and asphalt are the primary source of pollutants that enter the storm sewer system. In particular, localized vehicular traffic produces the majority of the pollutants that enter each catch basin which are removed by the fossil filters. Since the localized vehicular traffic, associated with local property, produces most of the pollution, the local property receives special benefit from the fossil filtration system by having the pollutants it produces removed from the stormwater runoff near the source of pollution. Cleaner Local Drainage Catch Basins: By managing, maintaining, and servicing the fossil filters, the catch basins are cleared of debris that might cause localized flooding. Catch basins are designed to collect storm water runoff that results from the large amount of impervious area on developed land.
Without clear, functioning catch basins, the stormwater runoff pools and floods local streets and property. Fossil filtration system maintenance confers a special benefit to property by ensuring they are clear of debris so that stormwater runoff can flow freely into the catch basin and not flood local property.
The above-mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties in the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties in the District; only properties in the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance.
5.3 General Benefit
Article XIII D of the California Constitution requires any local agency proposing to increase or impose a special assessment to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” General benefits are defined as those services or improvements which provide a general increase in property values to all property or provide benefits to the health, safety or education of the public. The rationale for separating special and general benefits is to ensure that the property owners are not charged with an assessment that pays for general benefits. Thus, a local agency carrying out projects or services that provide both special and general benefits may levy an assessment to pay for the special benefits but must acquire separate funding to pay for those general benefits.
5.4 General and Special Benefits Separated
The amount of general benefit that is conferred from the improvements and activities cannot be funded via benefit assessments. In order to separate only that portion of the budget which is related to special benefits conferred by the improvements and activities, thereby excluding those costs which are associated 1267
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 11 with general benefits related to the improvements and activities, pass through traffic data has been reviewed.
General benefit conferred from the improvements cannot be funded by assessments. In order to separate only that portion of the cost of operating, maintaining, and servicing the improvements which is related to special benefits conferred, thereby excluding those costs which are related to general benefits, pass through traffic data has been analyzed.
The City’s General Plan, adopted on June 13, 2012, indicates that streets within the City generally consist of local roads, secondary and major collectors, arterials and urban arterials. There is a general benefit component associated with traffic signals and fossil filter management along arterial/collector streets roughly equal to the percentage of pass-through trips using those streets (typically 15-25% based on the amount of traffic volume placed on each type of roadway). The following table summarizes the special and general benefit for the various types of roadways based on general industry practice standards:
In order to assess the parcels within the District for the special benefits received from the improvements and activities described in Section 3.1, the general and special benefits must be separated. The general benefit conferred by the improvements and activities is 81.25%. Accordingly, 18.75% of the benefits from the improvements and activities are considered to provide special benefits to the properties within the District and thus could be subject to assessment therein.
Roadway Type Special Benefit General Benefit Comments
Local 98% 2%
Nearly all traffic is generated by local properties;
the exception would be school busses, delivery and
service vans/trucks, meter readers, and turn
around traffic which is generally less than 2%.
Collector 50% 50% Some General Benefit related to thru traffic and overall traffic safety benefits from traffic signals.
Arterial 25% 75% Some General Benefit related to thru traffic and overall traffic safety benefits from traffic signals.
5.4.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The one traffic signal to be operated, maintained, and serviced is located along Limonite Avenue which is an Arterial according to the City of Eastvale General Plan. The intersecting roadway, Scholar Way is also an Arterial. Generally, Arterials would see an estimated 75% of trips attributed to pass through traffic rather than local traffic. The District is located on the west side of Scholar Way north of Limonite Avenue. Local traffic originates from District property, as well as from surrounding property. The additional local traffic from surrounding property not in the District results in a total portion of pass through traffic not related to District property of 81.25%.
5.4.2 FOSSIL FILTER MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE Seven of the fossil filters to be managed, inspected, and maintained are located along Scholar Way which is an Arterial according to the City’s General Plan. There is also one fossil filter on 58th Street which is a Collector. Generally, Arterials would see an estimated 75% of trips attributed to pass through traffic rather than local traffic. The District is located on the west side of Scholar Way north of Limonite Avenue and south 1268
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 12 of 58th Street. Local traffic originates from District property, as well as from surrounding property. The additional local traffic from surrounding property not in the District results in a total portion of pass-through traffic not related to District property of 81.25%.
5.4.3 GENERAL BENEFIT PORTION
The total general benefit conferred as a result of the improvements and activities is 81.25% which is based on the share of pass-through traffic related to traffic signal operation and maintenance and fossil filter management, inspection and maintenance.
5.5 Method of Assessment Spread
Each of the parcels in District are deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements.
As outlined above, each of the parcels within the District receives special benefit from the operation, maintenance, and services of the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the operation, maintenance, and services of the improvements. In order to facilitate this analysis, Benefit Points will be assigned based on the following factors:
5.5.1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AND FOSSIL FILTER MANAGEMENT,
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
Special benefit points are proportionally assigned to all parcels within the District for each of the following special benefits conferred:
Increased Safety to Motorists
Increased Safety to Pedestrians
Increased Traffic Capacity and Efficiency
Pretreatment of Local Drainage Stormwater
Cleaner Local Drainage Catch Basins
Each parcel with a residential county land use code is expected to generate traffic, which must pass through the signalized intersection and by the fossil filters, therefore, each parcel may be assigned one Benefit Point per dwelling unit per benefit. Likewise, each non-residential parcel is expected to generate traffic, which must pass through the signalized intersection and by the fossil filters, therefore each parcel may be assigned one Benefit Point per acre, or portion thereof, per benefit. (e.g. If the parcel acreage is 1.38, the parcel receives 1.38 Benefit Points per benefit.)
The maximum allowable assessment per parcel is the amount which was approved at the time of formation of the District, with the allowable annual increase also approved at the time of formation. A description of the allowable annual increase for the District has been excerpted from the formation Engineer’s Report and provided below:
1269
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 13 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 – The annual assessment will be adjusted annually by the greater of 2% or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U if any, as it stands as of March of each year over the base index for March of 2015.
The total amount of maintenance, servicing, and incidental costs for maintaining and operating the Improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property in the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the Assessment Roll in this report.
1270
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 14
6. APPENDICES
The following Appendices contain Appendix A – Assessment Diagram and Appendix B – Assessment Roll for the District.
1271
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 A APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following pages. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Annual Report.
1272
CITY OF EASTVALE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2014-2
(TRACTS 32821 & 32821-1)
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, THIS _______ DAY OF ______________, 20__. _______________________________
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EASTVALE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AN ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE ON THE LOTS, PIECES AND PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. THE ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE _______DAY OF ______________, 20__. THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT ROLL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE
OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR THE EXACT AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.
_______________________________
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EASTVALE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, THIS _______ DAY OF ______________ , 20__.
_______________________________
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF EASTVALE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
FILED THIS _______ DAY OF ______________ , 20__ AT THE HOUR OF _______ O’CLOCK _______ M. IN BOOK , PAGE ______________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.
_______________________________
COUNTY RECORDER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NOTES:
FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR’S PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE.
CITY OF EASTVALE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 LIMONITE AVE
58TH ST
SUMNER AVE
FUJI ST
DANCY ST
LARRY DEAN ST
BRIAR ST
VALENCIA ST
REDHAVEN ST
MULAN ST
SHORTHORN DR
CORTLAND ST
LAVONDA ST
SPRINGCREST ST
ELIAS
ST
HAZEL ST
MARYLAND AVE
RED GOLD ST
JARDENE ST HEATHER LEE ST
ASHWELL CT
CALITERRA C
D
T
ELICIOUS
WAY
CLEVELAND AVE
JAMESTOWN AVE
CAROLINAS LN
ANNANDALE PL
COSMOS ST
HEREFORD LN
BAY ST
LONGHORNE DR
BRIDGEWATER DR
PATTISON ST
EARLY CRIMSON ST
WESTCHESTER WAY
SAVANNAH PL
EMPIRE CT
ANNA CT
JIMSON CT
HOLLAND CT
KALY CT
ALEXANDRIAAVE
LYNDSEY ST
MCINTOSH CT
BLUEBELL ST
NOBURY
CT
DORSETT GOLDEN ST
ANJOU ST
RUBY CT
NUFFIELD CT
CHAROLAIS CT
KARA CT
TOM SAWYER
WAY
SALERS C
TA
T
NCY CT
BEVERLY HILLS CT
CLEVELAND AVE
0 0.0375 0.075 0.15 0.225
Miles
Legend
Assessment ID
Traffic Signal
Parcel Lines
District Boundary
Legend
Sheet 1 of 1
1 Assessment ID APN
1 164-030-027
1273
City of Eastvale
2025/26 Annual Report – Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 B APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
The assessment roll is a listing of the assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Riverside.
Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Annual Report.
Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.
The assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is listed on the following pages. 1274
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-711-001 6148 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 $14.38
164-711-002 6152 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-003 6156 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-004 6160 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-005 6134 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-006 6138 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-007 6142 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-008 6146 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-009 6132 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-010 6136 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-011 6140 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-012 6144 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-014 6103 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-015 6109 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-016 6115 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-017 6113 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-018 6107 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-019 6101 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-020 6104 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-021 6110 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-022 6116 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-023 6114 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-024 6108 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-025 6102 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-027 13055 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-028 13061 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-029 13049 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-030 13043 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-031 13031 SNAPDRAGON DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-032 13037 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-033 13025 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-034 13019 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-711-036 6118 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-037 6122 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-038 6126 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-039 6130 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-040 6116 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-041 6120 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-042 6124 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-043 6128 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-044 6102 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1275
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-711-045 6106 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-046 6110 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-047 6114 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-048 6100 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-049 6104 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-050 6108 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-051 6112 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-053 6121 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-054 6127 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-055 6133 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-056 6131 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-057 6125 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-058 6119 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-711-059 6120 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-060 6126 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-061 6132 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-062 6118 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-063 6124 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-711-064 6130 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-001 6068 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-002 6072 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-003 6076 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-004 6080 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-005 6078 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-006 6074 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-007 6070 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-008 6066 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-009 6052 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-010 6056 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-011 6060 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-012 6064 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-013 6062 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-014 6058 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-015 6054 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-016 6050 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-018 6070 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-019 6076 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-020 6082 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-021 6080 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-022 6074 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-023 6068 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1276
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-712-025 6050 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-026 6056 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-027 6062 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-028 6060 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-029 6054 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-030 6048 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-031 6055 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-032 6061 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-033 6067 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-034 6065 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-035 6059 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-036 6053 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-038 6034 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-039 6040 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-040 6046 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-041 6044 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-042 6038 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-043 6032 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-044 6037 SNAPDRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-045 6043 SNAPDRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-046 6049 SNAPDRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-047 6047 SNAPDRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-048 6041 SNAPGRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-049 6035 SNAPDRAGON WAY 5.0 14.38
164-712-051 6036 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-052 6040 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-053 6044 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-054 6048 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-055 6046 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-056 6042 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-057 6038 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-058 6034 SNAPDRAGON ST 5.0 14.38
164-712-059 6020 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-060 6024 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-061 6028 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-062 6032 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-063 6030 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-064 6026 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-065 6022 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-712-066 6018 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-713-001 13103 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1277
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-713-002 13109 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-003 13097 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-004 13091 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-005 13079 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-006 13085 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-007 13073 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-008 13067 GOLDENROD DR 5.0 14.38
164-713-010 6119 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-011 6125 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-012 6135 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-013 6129 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-014 6139 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-015 6145 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-016 6155 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-017 6149 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-019 6029 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-020 6031 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-021 6039 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-022 6033 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-023 6035 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-024 6041 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-025 6043 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-026 6037 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-028 6069 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-029 6075 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-030 6083 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-031 6077 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-032 6105 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-033 6111 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-034 6115 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-035 6109 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-037 6045 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-038 6051 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-039 6055 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-040 6049 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-041 6053 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-042 6059 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-043 6071 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-713-044 6065 ROSEWOOD WAY 5.0 14.38
164-721-001 5968 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-002 5972 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1278
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-721-003 5976 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-004 5980 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-005 5978 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-006 5974 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-007 5970 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-008 5966 LIMONIUM LN 5.0 14.38
164-721-009 5952 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-010 5956 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-011 5960 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-012 5964 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-013 5962 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-014 5958 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-015 5954 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-016 5950 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-018 5936 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-019 5940 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-020 5944 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-021 5948 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-022 5946 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-023 5942 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-024 5938 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-025 5934 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-026 5920 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-027 5924 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-028 5928 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-029 5932 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-030 5930 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-031 5926 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-032 5922 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-033 5918 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-035 13068 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-036 13074 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-037 13078 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-038 13072 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-039 13080 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-040 13086 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-041 13090 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-042 13084 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-044 13088 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-045 13094 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-046 13106 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1279
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-721-047 13100 IRISBEND AVE 5.0 14.38
164-721-049 13105 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-050 13099 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-051 13087 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-052 13093 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-053 13089 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-054 13083 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-055 13079 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-056 13085 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-057 13077 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-058 13071 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-059 13067 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-721-060 13073 SUGARLOAF DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-001 5878 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-002 5882 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-003 5886 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-004 5890 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-005 5888 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-006 5884 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-007 5880 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-008 5876 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-010 5862 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-011 5866 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-012 5870 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-013 5874 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-014 5872 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-015 5868 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-016 5864 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-017 5860 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-019 5846 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-020 5850 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-021 5854 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-022 5858 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-023 5856 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-024 5852 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-025 5848 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-026 5844 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-722-028 13048 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-029 13042 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-030 13038 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-031 13032 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1280
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-722-032 13010 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-033 13016 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-034 13020 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-035 13026 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-037 13056 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-038 13050 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-039 13046 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-040 13058 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-041 13062 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-042 13068 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-043 13042 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-044 13050 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-045 13058 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-046 13062 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-047 13054 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-048 13046 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-050 13086 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-051 13080 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-052 13076 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-053 13088 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-054 13092 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-055 13098 58TH ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-056 13044 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-057 13052 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-058 13060 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-059 13056 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-060 13048 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-722-061 13038 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-001 5985 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-002 5979 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-003 5973 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-004 5971 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-005 5977 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-006 5983 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-008 13043 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-009 13037 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-010 13035 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-011 13041 BRAMBLE ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-013 5938 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-014 5942 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-015 5946 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1281
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-723-016 5944 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-017 5940 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-018 5936 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-020 5969 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-021 5963 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-022 5957 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-023 5955 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-024 5961 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-025 5967 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-027 5952 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-028 5958 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-029 5964 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-030 5962 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-031 5956 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-032 5950 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-034 5863 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-035 5859 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-036 5855 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-037 5853 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-038 5857 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-039 5861 GINGER DR 5.0 14.38
164-723-041 5858 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-042 5862 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-043 5866 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-044 5864 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-045 5860 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-046 5856 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-048 5968 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-049 5974 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-050 5980 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-051 5978 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-052 5972 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-723-053 5966 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-001 5855 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-002 5853 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-003 5863 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-004 5861 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-005 5869 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-006 5871 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-007 5879 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-008 5877 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1282
City of Eastvale
BAD No. 2014 -2 (Tracts 32821 & 32821-1)
Preliminary Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Assessor's Parcel
Number Site Address Total BP Grand Total
164-724-009 5885 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-010 5887 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-012 5921 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-013 5919 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-014 5927 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-015 5929 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-016 5937 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-017 5935 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-018 5943 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-019 5945 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-021 5953 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-022 5951 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-023 5959 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-024 5961 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-025 5969 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-026 5967 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-027 5975 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-028 5977 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-029 5985 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-030 5983 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-031 5991 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
164-724-032 5993 SILVEIRA ST 5.0 14.38
350 Accounts 1,750.0 $5,033.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 9 05/02/2025 04:40:59PM 1283
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.8
May 28, 2025
Second Reading of an Ordinance Designa(ng Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Prepared By:
Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading and adopt an ordinance en
tled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, TO
DESIGNATE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES
Summary
The State Fire Marshal is mandated by Government Code (GC) 51178 to iden fy levels of fire hazard
based on consistent statewide criteria and the expected severity of fire hazards. Government Code 51179 requires the State Fire Marshal to make recommenda ons of fire hazard severity zones to
local agencies, as defined per GC 51177(e), for their designation and adoption by ordinance.
Cal Fire has iden
fied the City of Eastvale as having areas of moderate, high, and very high fire hazard and therefore must adopt an ordinance designa
ng these zones. These zones are primarily
used to inform building codes and wildfire mitigation strategies in high-risk areas.
The City of Eastvale is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adop
on of ordinances and resolu
ons, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in
the Government Code. With the excep
on of urgency ordinances, Government Code Sec
on 36934
requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the
me of introduc
on or passage unless a mo
on waiving the reading is adopted by a
majority of the City Council present. This Ordinance amendment was first introduced at the duly noticed City Council regular meeting on December 13, 2023. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1284
Background
On March 24, 2025, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protec on (CAL FIRE) released
new Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps. These maps indicate where the State’s fire safety regula ons
apply and define responsibilities for local and county fire departments in responding to fires.
A Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) is a geographic area classified by the State as having a Moderate, High, or Very High risk of wildfire. These classifica
ons are based on factors like vegeta
on, terrain,
weather paGerns, and fire history, helping guide building codes and wildfire mi ga
on strategies in
high-risk areas. The purpose of the map is to classify lands in accordance with whether a very high fire hazard is present so that public officials are able to iden fy measures that will reduce the rate of
fire spread and the intensity of uncontrolled fire through vegeta on management and
implementation of building standards developed to minimize loss of life, resources and property.
Proper
es and areas within designated fire severity zones must comply with a range of requirements. These include, but are not limited to, materials and construc on methods for exterior
wildfire exposure; mandatory natural hazard disclosures in real estate transac ons; defensible
space clearances; property development standards concerning roads, water supply, and signage; and integration of wildfire risk considerations into the development of future General Plans.
In an effort to address statewide concerns about the impact of fire hazard severity maps on insurance rates, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has issued a fact sheet clarifying that Cal Fire maps do not influence insurance rates or availability.
To ensure compliance with Government Code 51179, The City of Eastvale is required to adopt an ordinance within 120 days to designate fire hazard severity zones.
Per the direc
on of City Council and the Public Safety Commission, no fica
on leGers were mailed
to all properties that were identified as being in a fire severity zone.
Environmental
The proposed Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: A | Goal #: F Maintain fire response (Target A, Goal F).
Fiscal Impact
The proposed Ordinance will not result in a fiscal impact.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On April 22, 2025 the Public Safety Commission reviewed and commented on the Ordinance designa
ng fire hazard severity zones. The Commission has recommended that the City formally no
fy residents who are located within designated Fire Hazard Severity Zones, in order to enhance public awareness and preparedness.
On May 14, 2025, the City Council introduced, read by
tle, and waived further reading of an
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1285
ordinance en
tled: An Uncodified Ordinance of The City Council of The City of Eastvale, California, To Designate Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Ordinance Adopting Fire Hazard Severity Zones Attachment 2 - Eastvale Fire Severity Zone Map.pdf
Attachment 3 - California Insurance Commissioner Response to Fire Severity Zone Maps 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1286
4923-3825-1574 v1
ORDINANCE NO. 25-05
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, TO DESIGNATE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 51179 requires a local agency to adopt an ordinance designating those areas within its jurisdiction that are within moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones within 120 days of receiving the recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178; and
WHEREAS. on March 24, 2025, the State Fire Marshal released updated fire hazard severity zone recommendations for Southern California.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Designation of Fire Hazard Zones. The City Council of the City of Eastvale hereby approves the recommendation of the State Fire Marshal made pursuant to California Government Code Section 51178 and designates those areas within the City of Eastvale as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones as shown on the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map published by the Office of the State Fire Marshal.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Map. The City Council hereby adopts the portion of the State Fire Marshal’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map covering the City of Eastvale as the “City of Eastvale Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map.” A copy of the City of Eastvale Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map is on file with the City Clerk and can also be found on the City’s website under fire services.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.
SECTION 5. City Clerk Action. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general 1287
4923-3825-1574 v1
circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and pasting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633(c).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ___________, 2025. __________________________________________
Michael McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
1288
4923-3825-1574 v1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-05, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14th day of May, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _________, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
1289
City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:
Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)
Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:62,000 at 11" x 17"
Km 0 1 2 3 4 5
Mi 0 1 2 3
Very High High
Very High High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal
Eastvale
15 60
UNINCORPORATED
RIVERSIDE CO.
CHINO
CHINO HILLS
CORONA
FONTANA
JURUPA VALLEY
NORCO
ONTARIO
ONTARIO
RIVERSIDE
R I V E R S I D E C O .
S A N B E R N A R D I N O
C O .
R I V E R S I D E
C O .
March 24, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire Marshal
Local Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF EASTVALE – RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility
Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024
1290
insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
CAL FIRE hazard maps do not affect insurance rates or availability Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a fact
sheet explaining that CAL FIRE hazard maps do not
affect insurance rates or availability. A Spanishlanguage fact sheet is also available.
For many years, insurance companies have been
using wildfire risk models for determining where they
will write and renew policies, and how much premium
to charge a policyholder -- not the Fire Hazard
Severity Zone maps. CAL FIRE’s maps are required
by law and their purpose is to drive local planning
decisions, not insurance decisions.
Commissioner’s POV: “Let me be clear: The CAL
FIRE hazard maps are not used for insurance rates
or underwriting decisions. But they will empower
communities with more accurate information about
the very real hazards we face. The reality is we all
need to do more to protect our homes and communities from wildfires. When communities know and understand their risks, they can plan and prepare.”
Background: The Department of Insurance is implementing a Sustainable Insurance Strategy aimed at supporting safer communities. Based on feedback gathered from thousands of town halls and meetings with homeowners, businesses, and individual consumers, Commissioner Lara implemented an aggressive approach to modernize insurance regulations to address insurance accessibility challenges for consumers.
Commissioner Lara’s new Safer from Wildfires regulation clarifies what actions you should take to reduce wildfire risks and receive an insurance discount.
Insurance companies use computerized wildfire catastrophe models to determine which homes to write based on the risk of loss. Building on the Safer from Wildfires initiative — the nation’s first wildfire safety discount program — the strategy requires catastrophe models to account for mitigation efforts by homeowners, businesses, and communities, something not possible even a few months ago under outdated regulations.
Learn More: The Department of Insurance fact sheet is posted at CAL FIRE’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone web page where you can learn more about enhancing your property’s fire safety and view current versions of maps.
1291
insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
Exciting News! ��� The California Department of Insurance (CDI) is proud to introduce the Community Outreach and Education Partnership Initiative. This dynamic program is designed to raise consumer awareness about CDI's vital services and expand understanding of key insurance topics and fraud prevention. Become a valued partner and unlock exclusive access to:
• Comprehensive consumer education materials
• Specialized training sessions
• Powerful social media tools
Become a Partner Today: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VHGZQHT 1292
1 insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
Q&A – Insurance and CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps
1. How will the updated CAL FIRE maps affect insurance availability and affordability? CAL FIRE’s maps are intended to drive local planning decisions, not insurance decisions. Under Commissioner Lara’s new regulation finalized in October 2022, insurance companies must provide discounts for wildfire safety actions such as community mitigation and home-hardening, which CAL FIRE’s maps do not assess. In addition, insurance companies are already using risk analysis tools and models that go beyond CAL FIRE’s proposed maps in determining what properties they will underwrite.
Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire safety regulation will help increase access to insurance by promoting wildfire safety across the state. Reducing wildfire risks throughout the state is the primary way we can make insurance more available and affordable, and our regulation is a major step towards that goal. CAL FIRE’s maps support that goal through improving public education about hazard and the need for safety preparation.
2. How will these maps benefit the public?
Public education about where current wildfire hazards exist is essential to reducing the threat to local communities and maintaining access to available and affordable insurance. When communities know and understand their risks, they can plan and prepare.
In addition, the Department’s first-ever report on climate insurance recommended updated wildfire hazard mapping to improve public safety.
3. If you are a homeowner and your zone changed from High Hazard to Very High Hazard, will this impact your insurance premiums or renewal ability? For many years, insurance companies have been using alternate wildfire risk tools for determining where they will write and renew policies, and how much premium to charge a policyholder, not the Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps. Therefore, a change in designation on the maps for a single homeowner is unlikely to affect their insurance. The reality is that more accurate risk information enables homeowners and communities to reduce their wildfire risks, and Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire mitigation regulation clarifies what actions you should take to reduce wildfire risks. Once that regulation is fully implemented, if a homeowner or business owner takes those risk mitigation actions, they will be able to see a discount in their insurance premium. 1293
2 insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
4. How is the state addressing wildfire mitigation?
By design, CAL FIRE’s maps are focused on long-range wildfire hazard, which includes only certain variables, like wind, vegetation, ember production and movement, climate, topography, and fire history. CAL FIRE’s maps will give up to date information to communities about the level of wildfire hazard they face, which could help target resources at the state and local level. Expanded state grant programs and Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire safety regulation are aimed at reducing wildfire risks to communities through programs such as Firewise USA and the new Fire Risk Reduction Community designation from the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. 1294
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.9
May 28, 2025
Agreement with Corona-Norco Unified School District for Traffic Study Reimbursement
Prepared By:
Stephanie Vasquez, Assistant to the City Manager
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the updated Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement with Corona-Norco Unified School District for a term of one year with two automatic one-year renewal options.
Summary
Since 2012, the City of Eastvale and CNUSD have partnered to conduct traffic studies as needed to evaluate poten.al school crossing guard loca.ons. These studies help inform decisions regarding student pedestrian safety and placement of crossing guards.
Under the prior agreement, traffic studies were reimbursed annually on a case-by-case basis. The new agreement maintains the 50/50 cost-sharing structure up to a maximum of $25,000 per fiscal year, but extends the term to one (1) year with two (2) addi.onal automa.c renewal op.ons of one year each, unless either party provides 90-day written notice of non-renewal.
Background
The City of Eastvale conducts traffic studies, o5en ini.ated by CNUSD, to determine if condi.ons meet criteria for crossing guard placement near Eastvale schools. The original agreement allowed for a single-year commitment. CNUSD and the City now seek a more streamlined approach through multi-year framework that provides consistency and administrative efficiently. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1295
Key provisions of the updated agreement include:
50% cost-sharing for eligible traffic studies
$25,000 not-to-exceed annual reimbursement cap
Initial term of one year from July 1, 2025-June 30, 2026 Automatic renewal for up to two additional one-year terms 90-day notice requirement for termination or non-renewal Environmental
The approval of the Traffic Study Reimbursement does not have environmental impact.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
There is no change in fiscal impact from the prior agreement. The City’s share of traffic study costs remains capped at $25,000 annually, budgeted within the General Fund under Engineering contract services account number 100-320-6490.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
City Council Approved a Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement for one year at the June 12, 2024 Council Meeting.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - EV TRAFFIC STDY NN 2024
Attachment 2 - Agreement for Traffic Study Reimbursement (2025 - 2028) 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1296
1297
1298
4924-4918-8927 v1 -1-
Agreement for Traffic Study Reimbursement
This Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this __ day of _____ 2025 by and between the City of Eastvale (“City”) and Corona-Norco Unified School District (“District”), as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and District desire to conduct traffic studies to inform decisions regarding the provision of crossing guards at District schools within the City and for the City and District to split the costs associated with such traffic studies equally.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into the Agreement as follows:
1. TERM.
This Agreement shall commence on July 01, 2025 and continue through June 30, 2026. This Agreement will automatically renew for two (2) additional terms of one (1) year each unless either party gives written notice of non-renewal to the other party at least 90 days prior to the end of the thencurrent term.
2. REIMBURSEMENT.
City may conduct traffic studies to inform the selection of sites within the City where crossing guard services will be provided. District agrees to reimburse City for 50% of the cost of performing such traffic studies not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). Payment shall be made by District within thirty (30) days of District’s receipt of an invoice from City.
3. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.
b. Indemnification. Either party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party, its Board, agents and employees from any and all liabilities, claim, debts, damages, demands, suits, actions and cause of action of whatsoever kind, nature, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of the other party. c. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party.
d. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other Party. District’s obligation to reimburse City for traffic studies previously conducted or underway shall survive termination of this Agreement. 1299
4924-4918-8927 v1 -2-
e. Notices. All written notices to be given pursuant to the terms hereof shall be either delivered by personal or deposited in the United States mail first class, postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
DISTRICT: Corona-Norco Unified School District
2820 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: Student Services
CITY: City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 92880
Attention: City Manager
The foregoing names and addresses may be changed by written notice to the other Party as provided herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CITY OF EASTVALE:
________________________________
Mark Orme, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Erica L. Vega, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
1300
4924-4918-8927 v1 -3-
CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
_________________________________
Dr. Samuel Buenrostro, Superintendent
1301
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.10
May 28, 2025
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance amending Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets.
Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014; June 24, 2015; July 11, 2018; January 26, 2022; and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
Segment 2: 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue Segment 23: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road Segment 28: Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way Segment 32: Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel Segment 33: Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue Segment 46: Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of appropriate and safe travel speeds, and to protect the general public from the risks posed by reckless or unpredictable driving behavior.
Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1302
Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.
In California, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be set using an Engineering and Traffic Survey (ETS), rather than through arbitrary methods. This approach ensures that speed limits are defensible and appropriate for the roadway condiBons. The CVC also includes the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350), which states:
“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Properly posted speed limits assist law enforcement in ciBng drivers who violate the Basic Speed Law and give drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
The engineering and traffic survey study involves the three major elements of data collecBon and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) SecBon 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 EdiBon, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideraBon for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabiliBes, users of personal assisBve mobility devices, and the unhoused.
The City Council last adopted an Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
Segment 2: 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue Segment 23: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road Segment 28: Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way Segment 32: Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel Segment 33: Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue Segment 46: Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road These segments were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way - Segment 28 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel - Segment 32 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1303
Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue - Segment 33
2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue - Segment 2 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road - Segment 23 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road - Segment 46 Based on the ETS results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these six (6) segments is shown below:
Segment No. Street Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and
Sumner Avenue
40 40
23 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Avenue and
Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd
50 45
28 Harrison Avenue
Limonite Avenue and
Blossom Way
45 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to
Cucamonga Creek Channel
(New)
None 45
33 Limonite Avenue
Cucamonga Creek Channel
to Archibald Avenue
(New
None 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman
Road
35 35
The recommended speed limits were reviewed and found acceptable by the Riverside County Sheriff's Office, which provides contract law enforcement services to the City of Eastvale.
To ensure enforceability, each speed limit recommendaBon must be supported by an ETS that can withstand legal scruBny. This survey includes all required documentaBon under State law. Once the ordinance is adopted, updates to posted speed limits will be implemented accordingly.
Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 7 Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addiBonal speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaBons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esBmated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1304
Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2025 Speed Survey Amendment Phase 1
Attachment 2 - Ordinance
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1305
2025
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
(Draft)
Adopted on __________ by Ordinance 25-__
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 23-13
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 22-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 2018-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 15-04
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July 24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10
Approved By:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650
Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra Group, Inc.
1306
1307
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3
3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9
4.0 Roadway Segment Field Review 11
4.1 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12
4.2 Factors That May Be Considered 12
4.3 Recommended Speed Limits 12
4.4 Speed Limit Signing 13
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14
5.1 Summary and Conclusions
5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance 14
APPENDIX
APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Table
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
1308
1309
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for six (6) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.
The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.
The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.
This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied, that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified, and that the provisions of AB 43 have been incorporated in the analysis. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022, while other sections went into effect on January 1, 2023. All sections are currently in effect. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, which took effect on January 1, 2023, when Revision 8 of the CA MUTCD was approved, and on April 1, 2025, when Revision 9 of the CA MUTCD was approved.
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 City Council approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
1310
Introduction
2 2 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 23 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road 28 Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 32 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel33 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue 46 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road The segments below were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way – Segment 28 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel – Segment 32 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue – Segment 33
2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue – Segment 2 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 23 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road – Segment 46 This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the six (6) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.
At six (6) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the 2025 CA MUTCD 2014, rev 9. Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E. 1311
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
The engineering and traffic survey study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, passed in 2021, introduced concepts from Vision Zero into the determination of speed limits. AB 1938, passed in 2022, made further modifications. The goal of Vision Zero is to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries to zero, based on the Safe System Approach. The basic tenet of Vision Zero is that human beings are vulnerable to traffic collisions, the severity of injuries and death are directly affected by speed, and roadway speeds should be reduced wherever possible, using the Safe System Approach, to achieve Vision Zero. AB 43 maintains the use of the 85th percentile speed as the base for setting speed limits, but makes it easier to reduce speed limits. The effects of AB 43 are discussed below, under Analysis. 1312
Study Methodology
4 Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for six (6) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.
Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 (two years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.
Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.
Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:
Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.
Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.
The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:
A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.
AB 43 also allows the speed limits as determined above, to be reduced an additional 5 mph or the existing speed limits to be maintained under certain conditions. If a local authority, after 1313
Study Methodology
5 completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance:
Reduce the speed limit by an additional five miles per hour on a section of highway designated as a Safety Corridor or if the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. Retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
Determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Crash Data on California State Highways (Road Miles, Travel, Crashes, Crash Rates) published by Caltrans. The latest edition, 2022, was used for this 2025 analysis.
The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:
Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years Where: Number of midblock collisions based on 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.
1314
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0
SURVEY RESULTS
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey
Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.
The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.
Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the six (6) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
Posted speed limit
Direction of survey
Date and time of speed survey
Weather conditions
Number of vehicles observed in each direction
Speed of each surveyed vehicle
15th percentile speed
50th Percentile speed
85th Percentile speed
10 mph pace speed
Percent over pace speed
Percent in pace speed
Percent under pace speed
Average speed
The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 1315
7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(Amended April 2025)
No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 40 40 No Change - 85th%ile 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street
N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decreased - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S 50 48 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the north. 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue2 N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way2 N/S 45 40 35 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b) 29 30
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Ch. NE/SW None3 52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 33 Cucamonga Creek Ch to Archibald Avenue NE/SW None3
52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 34 35
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage, no bike lanes
(Continued on Next Page)
1316
8 No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I15)E/W None 59 55 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduced - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 43 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2, CVC 22358.7. 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None 43 40 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1Roadway segments studied for 2025 E&TS are highlighted in gray. 2 Segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Rd & Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Ave since the character of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave. 3Two segments, currently studied (Nos. 32 & 33), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 4See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA laws, AB 43 & AB 1938. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 1317
9 Survey Results
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis
The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.
Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”
It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.
The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.
Example:
Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 106
Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road:
Collision Rate = 3 x 106
25,139 x 365 x 0.83 x 2
= 0.20 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)
The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2022 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the six (6) segments studied in the 2025 analysis, and are shown in the table below.
No. Street Between Lane Type
Statewide
Collision
Rate1
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 20 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 6 lanes, divided 1.17 26 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 2 lanes, undivided 1.24 32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 4 lanes, divided 1.17 33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 4 lanes, divided 1.17 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 1 Statewide Collision Rates listed are averages for Suburban (Rural Inside City + Urban Outside City) roads. 1318
10 Table 2: Collision Analysis
(Amended April 2025)
No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 6,155 0 0.00 1.24 No 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3,755 1 0.24 0.93 No 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20,934 7 0.19 1.29 No 9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2,497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3,828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 1.16 No 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No 23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 25,139 3 0.20 1.17 No 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 1.05 No 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 1.83 No 26 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 0.21 1,100 3,015 0 0.00 1.24 No 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No 31 Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No (Continued on Next Page)
1319
11 No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel (New) 0.60 3,150 14,735 1 0.16 1.17 No 33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue (New) 0.56 2,950 15.549 0 0.00 1.17 No 34 Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 1.17 No 35 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 1.17 No 36 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7,806 4 0.62 1.32 No 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 1.32 No 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 6,389 0 0.00 1.24 No 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4,721 0 0.00 0.91 No 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6,678 1 0.20 1.60 No 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 Newly-surveyed roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 2-year period for newly surveyed segments and 3-year period for prior segments. 3 Col/MVM = Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 4 The previous survey on Harrison Avenue (Segment 27) included the segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Avenue. The latest surveyed segment (Segment 28) includes Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way since, the portion of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave, the previously-surveyed segment, in width and traffic volume..
1320
12 Survey Results
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.
The roadway segments were driven and videorecorded by Mr. Alan Perkins, Senior Engineering Technician, and reviewed by Ruth Smith, Senior Traffic Engineer (contracted through Ardurra Group).
The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were noted in the study on the Strip Maps, found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and Section 22358.6(b).
The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
Collision History
Collision Rate
Average Daily Traffic Volume
Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations Factors Indicating Land or Facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, including the presence of sidewalks, bikeways, crosswalks, schools, parks, employment centers, retail, senior centers, cultural areas, religious facilities, health/medical facilities and transit stops
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways Adjacent Land Uses
1321
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 SECTION 4.0
SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Factors That May Be Considered
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.
The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered. Most recent collision record (mid-block)
Roadway characteristics
Shoulder condition
Grade
Alignment
Sight Distance
Roadside development and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity
Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Residential density
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
4.2 Recommended Speed Limits
The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 1322
Survey Findings and Recommendations
14 4.3 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.
It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.
Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.
Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested. 1323
Summary and Conclusions
15 SECTION 5.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Summary and Conclusions
1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 9, Section 2B.13.
2. Daily traffic counts for six (6) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2025 on March 25.
3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.
4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.
5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on four (4) of the six (6) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed or established, as listed below.
Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
23 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & CantuGalleano Ranch Road 50 45 Reducing speed limit by 5 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
28 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue & Blossom
Way 45 35 Reducing speed limit
by 10 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue &
Cucamonga Creek Channel
(new street segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)
33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel &
Archibald Avenue (new street
segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)
5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance
Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as provided on the following pages.
1324
1325
APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated April 2025)
1326
1327
1 Appendix A
RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific two-year interval of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.
In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:
If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.
If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.
Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 1328
2 Appendix A
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.
Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.
The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar or lidar enforcement.
APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 1329
3 Appendix A
40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) Downward Speed Zoning Exceptions
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Initial Rounding to Nearest Five MPH
22358.6 (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.
Note: Section 22358.6 was modified by Assembly Bill 1938, and the modifications became effective on January 1, 2023.
Additional Five MPH Reduction
22358.7 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine 1330
4 Appendix A
and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. Note: Revision 8 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2014 Edition, effective on January 26, 2023, includes the provisions of this section, making them currently effective.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.7 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.
Maintaining Existing Speed Limit
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1331
5 Appendix A
1, 2022, then was amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.
Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit
22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.
Speed Trap 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
1332
6 Appendix A
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning and became effective on January 1, 2022.):
(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
1333
7 Appendix A
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone, business activity district or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business 1334
8 Appendix A
activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then modified by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.) Speed Trap Evidence
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c)When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of 1335
9 Appendix A
separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
(c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
1336
10 Appendix A
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1337
11 Appendix A
1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For the purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transporatation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the grant funding, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
State Highways within Local Jurisdictions
22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.) 22354.5 (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular 1338
12 Appendix A
portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the speed limit.
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
1339
APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated April 2025)
1340
1341
17 Appendix B
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated April 2025)
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates.
Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.
The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a 1342
18 Appendix B
particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.
CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).
Option:
1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c). 3.
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC 1343
19 Appendix B
Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85thpercentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).
Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7. 12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).
Support:
12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.
CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.
Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways.
12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.
Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State 1344
20 Appendix B
Highway System
12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.
Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:
1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.
2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more of the required crash weighting factors listed in the Table 2B-105(CA) shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.
Option:
12p Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).
Standard:
12q The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:
1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.
2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.
3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12r Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.
Guidance:
12s A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.
Option:
12t For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. 12u To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.
Standard:
1345
21 Appendix B
12v A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.
Option:
12w Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12x Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.
Option:
12y Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).
Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).
Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet. Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet. Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.
Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.
CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.
Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
1346
22 Appendix B
CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:
1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.
2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.
3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:
4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. 7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.
Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c). 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are 1347
23 Appendix B
traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.
If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 1348
24 Appendix B
vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.
B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that 1349
25 Appendix B
conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.
Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.
Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.
Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed 1350
26 Appendix B
approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.
Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.
Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
1351
27 Appendix B
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.
Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed 1352
28 Appendix B
limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.
Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.
Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Support:
1353
29 Appendix B
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.
Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
1354
30 Appendix B
b. The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
c. Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
b. A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.
Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352. 96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).
Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are 1355
31 Appendix B
met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.
Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.
An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
105 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.
Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.
Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1356
32 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1357
33 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1358
34 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1359
35 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1360
36 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 1361
37 Appendix B
Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD
Text Headings
Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.
Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.
Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.
The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.
Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.
Words and Phrases
Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed—the summation of the instantaneous or spot-measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.
Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85thpercentile speeds. (e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
1362
38 Appendix B
Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.
Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.
Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)—the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.
Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.
Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.
CVC – California Vehicle Code.
Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.
Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.
Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.
Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 1363
39 Appendix B
exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.
Engineering Study—the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.
Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.
Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.
Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).
Pedestrian Facilities—a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.
Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.
Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared-use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
1364
40 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.
Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.
Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
1365
APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated April 2025)
1366
1367
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586
0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1368
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 2
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
Speed Limit Recommendation
40 mph
No Change, same as existing
85th percentile speed
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Heavy pedestrian & vehicular traffic during school. Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and bike traffic.
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane, Divided. Straight alignment. bike lanes, but substandard.
Comments:
Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary at Harrison Ave.
Residences do not front on 65th St. - no direct access.
Residential
38 - 47 mph
40 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted median
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
46 65th Street
Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
6,155
Appendix C
1369
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
Appendix C
1370
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642
0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1371
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260
1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1372
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1373
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700
1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1374
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580
1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1375
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010
1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1376
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030
0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Cul-de-sac near River Road.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1377
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650
1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.
Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1378
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575
0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1379
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1380
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.18
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323
0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
Appendix C
1381
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075
1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1382
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.14
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.
Comments:
Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.
Appendix C
1383
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.39
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626
0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
Appendix C
1384
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curves.
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1385
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600
0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved
.'-vk
and
Vl-1
Authorized
Qn-::
for release by City Traffic
7 Engineer*:
/Jo/Zo,ei t �I ,_ �11
. •'
* Contract
Ruth Smith,
services
TE,
provided
PTP
by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date �,,,�� 0, � Segment #19
Appendix C
1386
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295
0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1387
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1388
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800
0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway width reductions.
Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1389
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 23
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Ave & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
North/South
Traffic Data
25,139
4,400
0.83 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Commercial, Residential and Industrial
38 - 47 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
5-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.
Comments:
Residences do not front onto Hamner Avenue - no direct access.
Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Matches segments to the south.
Appendix C
1390
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*: � �� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;! Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date J}
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 Appendix C
1391
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved
�Wl
and Authorized
µtfor release by City Traffic Engineer*: �
1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
* Contract
Ruth Smith,
services
TE,
provided
PTP
by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date � Segment#25
Appendix C
1392
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1393
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080
1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1394
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
40 Harrison Ave
Limonite Avenue & Blossom Way
North/South
Traffic Data
3,015
1,100
0.21 1 Lane in Each Direction
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Residential
30 - 39 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. On-street parking on West side, small park, Roadway Geometrics:
2-Lane, undivided. Straight alignment.
Comments:
Residences do not front onto Harrison Avenue - no direct access.
Speed Limit Recommendation
35 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b)
Appendix C
1395
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100
0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1396
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120
1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1397
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 31
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070
0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1398
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
15,549
6,100
1.16 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
44 - 53 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.08
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. 1-Lane Roundabout west of Archibald Ave. Curved alignment Comments:
This is a new street segment that was not previously studied.
Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1, Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, CVC22358.6(b).
Appendix C
1399
Engineering Traffic Survey Summary
Location:
Between:
Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed (mph):
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
4/22/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Ave
Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Ave
E/W
Traffic Data
15,549
2,950
0.56 4 lanes, divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
42 - 51 mph
None
Collision History
1/1/2023 - 12/31/2024
0 0.00
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Recommendation
50 Established
Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b), segment is "S" curve ending at flood control channel.
Appendix C
1400
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:
Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.
Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•: C ;i,- 1Y
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. H!lt:t s
7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (,
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment# Appendix C
1401
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I 6'�) I ll:IO �)!,
1. * Contract
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
services provided by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date �,�� # Segment#
Appendix C
1402
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.
Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1403
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1404
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380
0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1405
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970
0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.
Agricultural land west of Hall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1406
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500
0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1407
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:
Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.
Comments:
Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved
'--t,,t,_ 11---
and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*: � j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1 I. ;; Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group �� Segment# Appendix C
1408
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1409
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1410
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1411
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040
0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1412
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location:
Between:
Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No Change
85th percentile speed, Option 2, CVC 22358.7.
School / Residential
34 - 43 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes, painted shoulders between Orange and Baltimore.
Comments:
High School, intermediate school, elementary school, & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.
Residences do not front onto Scholar Way - no direct access. 43 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
North/South
Traffic Data
6,389
3,300
0.63 2 Lanes in Each Direction with 2-Way Left Turn Lane, partial painted median Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Undivided. Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Appendix C
1413
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1414
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700
0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.
Roadway Geometrics:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1415
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 49
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935
1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1416
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 50
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422
1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1417
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 51
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542
0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.
Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1418
1419
APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated April 2025)
1420
1421
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE
0.49 mi
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET
UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North SCHOLAR WAY JAMESTOWN AVENUE HAMNER AVENUE • 35 MPH Appendix D
1422
Appendix D
1423
Appendix D
1424
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)
0.31 mi
RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North 35 MPH • HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST • 35 MPH Appendix D
1425
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North SUMNER AVENUE SCHOLAR WAY HAMNER AVENUE 68TH STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1426
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET
0.5 mi
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST I-15 INTERSTATE HWY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •
WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
Appendix D
1427
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET
1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
RIVER STREET
ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
RIVER RD
WIND
BARON
ROAD
BLUFF
GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD
55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
Appendix D
1428
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD WIND RIVER RD
GRAPEWIN
STREET
CHANDLER STREET
FIELDMASTER
STREET
SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK EASTVALE
PKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
1429
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North INDUSTRIAL
ARCHI BALD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
50 MPH • 50 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
Appendix D
1430
Appendix D
1431
Appendix D
1432
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT
0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •
CITY LIMIT BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL INTERSTATE HWY
CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
1433
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BLOSSOM WAY
HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.5 mi
BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE CEDAR CREEK ROAD SUMNER AVENUE 30 MPH • • 30 MPH
REDSIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 30 MPH • PINE GROVE PL
Appendix D
1434
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.
HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY
.50 mi
CANTU-GALLEANO
RANCH RD.
COMMERCIAL
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< LIMIT (I-15) HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL GOODMAN RD. &IT< LIMIT
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH Appendix D
1435
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HELLMAN AVENUE ARCHIBALD AVENUE HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE
1.53 mi
RESIDENTIAL • 45 MPH
SELBY AVENUE
SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1436
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY
0
PL SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL HIGH SCHOOL
PARK • 40 MPH COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE COBBLE CREEK DRIVE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Appendix D
1437
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL ವ MP+ SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) ವ MP+ HIGH SCHOOL
RESIDENTIAL
PARK MAYFIELD STREET CARROLLTON PLACE
Appendix D
1438
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
FIELDMASTER STREET
HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi
RESIDENTIAL
FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
E
K
RD
C
H
E
R
R
Y
MEADOW
BROOK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK
HALL RD
ARCHIBALD AVE
Appendix D
1439
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Goodman Way
Street Segment: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road to Hamner Avenue Segment Length (MI): 0.68 mi
North
GOODMAN WAY
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
• 35 MPH
35 MPH•
35 MPH•
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
1440
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NorthRIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
FAIR GROUNDS
PARK RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1441
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 65TH STREET 45 MPH • 45 MPH • 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
1442
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER
HAMNER AVENUE
0.91 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH
SWAN LAKE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
• 45 MPH
AVENUE
45 MPH •
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1443
Appendix D
1444
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: HAMNER AVENUE
Street Segment: CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD & RIVERSIDE DRIVE Segment Length (MI): 1.23 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF ONTARIO
CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
VACANT
LAND
UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
1445
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Hamner Avenue
Street Segment: Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street Segment Length (MI): 0.99 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SR 60 FREWAY
MISSION BLVD
UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF ONTARIO
CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL
PHILADELPHIA AVENUE
Appendix D
1446
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI): CHANDLER STREET
North
HARRISON AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH
NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1447
Appendix D
1448
Appendix D
1449
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD TO
0.97 mi
CONSERVATION
AREA
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMITS
RIVER ROAD
CHANDLER STREET
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1) 50 MPH •
UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED
CHANDLER STREET
Appendix D
1450
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMIT
CHANDLER STREET
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
UNDEVELOPED 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • 50 MPH •
SCHOOL
WALTERS STREET ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKETSTREET
PINE AVENUE PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD LANDERWOOD DRIVE BICKMORE AVENUE
1.54 mi
CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE
LIMONITE AVE
PARK INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHINO CORONA ROAD KIMBALL AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1451
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE
LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
0.20 mi
HELLMAN AVENUE CHANDLER STREET INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL LIMONITE AVE
INDUSTRIAL SUMMIT DR
INDUSTRIAL HELLMAN AVENU CITY LIMIT ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)
1.54 mi KIMBALL AVENUE
CITY LIMIT INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
1452
Appendix D
1453
Appendix D
1454
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Archibald Avenue to Sumner Avenue
Segment Length (MI): 1 mi
North
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ONTARIO RANCH ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
1455
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Sumner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 1.53 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
AGRICULTURE
SCHOLAR WAY
HAMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH
LIMONITE
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
SUMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH
I-15 FWY
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
UNDEVELOPED
AGRICULTURE
RETAIL
Appendix D
1456
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD
MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS (I-15)
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL 60 MPH •
Appendix D
1457
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
ORANGE STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL
ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •
SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH
SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
AGRICULTURE RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1458
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD
0.26 mi
NOT TO SCALE
RESIDENTIAL
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1459
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVER ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
0.75 mi
NOT TO SCALE
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD
HALL ROAD
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1460
Appendix D
1461
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Riverside Drive
Street Segment: Hamner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 0.44 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
HAMNER AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL
I-15 FWY
• 50 MPH
MILLIKEN AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
1462
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
ARCHI BALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •
COMMERCIAL
Appendix D
1463
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD
SUMNER
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
HARRISON
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUEAVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
Appendix D
1464
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED 45 MPH •
Appendix D
1465
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE
0.58 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN
HAMMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1466
Appendix D
1467
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
SCHOLAR WAY
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOLAR
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
LIMONITE AVE
WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
Appendix D
1468
Appendix D
1469
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET
1.12 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1470
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
1.03 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
ORCHARD
PARK
SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
1471
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
WHITEWELL ROAD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
0.29 mi
NOT TO SCALE
WHITEWELL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH
PRAIRIE
SMOKE RD
Appendix D
1472
1473
APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated April 2025)
1474
1475
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 0 0 45 044 0 2 44 X X 2 Time43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:0539 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E33 1 1 33 X X 2 *32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%29 3 1 29 X X X X 428 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%27 1 2 27 X X X 326 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1476
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 8 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 7 2 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 6% 8% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 80% 78% 73%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 6 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 18%
35 0 3 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1477
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:3049 1 2 49 X X X 348 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 736 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%35 0 2 35 X X 234 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 1 1 33 X X 232 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
1478
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:2049 2 2 49 X X X X 448 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 636 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
1479
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:2552 1 0 52 X 151 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:5049 1 2 49 X X X 348 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 636 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
1480
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:0062 0 1 62 X 161 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:2559 1 2 59 X X X 358 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%47 2 2 47 X X X X 446 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%45 0 1 45 X 144 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH43 0 0 43 042 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1481
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 1 3 59 X X X X 458 4 0 58 X X X X 457 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:0552 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:3049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 744 1 3 44 X X X X 443 1 0 43 X 142 1 0 42 X 141 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1482
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
1483
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 1 45 X 144 1 1 44 X X 2 Time43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P32 0 1 32 X 1 A31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 624 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1484
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:2052 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 751 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:4049 0 1 49 X 148 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%37 2 2 37 X X X X 436 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%35 1 1 35 X X 234 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1485
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:4062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:5559 0 0 59 058 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 2 0 56 X X 255 3 2 55 X X X X X 554 0 3 54 X X X 3 *53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13%45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH43 3 2 43 X X X X X 542 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 1 0 40 X 139 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1486
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 0 0 44 0 Time43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:1042 1 0 42 X 141 1 0 41 X 1 Time40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:5039 2 0 39 X X 238 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%25 2 2 25 X X X X 424 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH23 1 0 23 X 122 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1487
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 4 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 5 3 51 X X X X X X X X 8 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 *
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 38% 44% 41%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 C
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 60% 54% 56%
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 2% 2% 3%
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 *
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
1488
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 655 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:4052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:1549 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
1489
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
1490
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:4052 2 0 52 X X 251 2 0 51 X X 2 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:0049 1 1 49 X X 2 *48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%39 1 1 39 X X 238 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1491
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 3 0 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:3042 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:2039 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *34 1 0 34 X 133 3 2 33 X X X X X 532 2 0 32 X X 231 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1492
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 * Time
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 * From: 11:50
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 P Time
40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A To: 12:20
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 C
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 E Existing
37 5 2 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 6 36 X X X X X X X X 8 *
35 0 3 35 X X X 3 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5
31 2 0 31 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 3 0 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 4% 12% 10%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 2 0 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 60% 74% 65%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 36% 14% 25%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 35 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1493
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:2062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:4059 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 0 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 0 1 56 X 155 1 0 55 X 154 4 2 54 X X X X X X 653 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11%45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH43 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH41 0 3 41 X X X 340 1 0 40 X 139 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH38 0 1 38 X 137 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1494
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:5052 1 2 52 X X X 351 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:1049 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%39 1 2 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%37 0 0 37 036 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1495
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:0052 1 3 52 X X X X 451 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:2049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%39 2 0 39 X X 238 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1496
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 1:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 1:25
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 P
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 A
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
41 6 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 22% 14% 20% 39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 69%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1497
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive62 0 1 62 X 161 0 1 61 X 160 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 1 1 58 X X 257 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:56 1 3 56 X X X X 455 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:5552 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:1549 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 1 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 543 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 3 1 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%39 1 0 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
1498
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
1499
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 1 58 X 157 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 2 56 X X 255 1 0 55 X 154 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:1052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:3049 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%39 0 1 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1500
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:5052 2 0 52 X X 251 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:2049 4 2 49 X X X X X X 648 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 * 38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 336 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1501
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Blossom Way
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 From: 11:30
42 2 0 42 X X 2
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 3 0 40 X X X 3 To: 12:20
39 2 1 39 X X X 3 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
36 0 5 36 X X X X X 5 P
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 5 5 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
33 2 3 33 X X X X X 5 E
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 1 3 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 2% 8% 18%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 0 3 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 68% 70% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 30% 22% 17%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1502
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:1562 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:0059 1 2 59 X X X 358 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%45 2 0 45 X X 244 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH43 0 1 43 X 142 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1503
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue)72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:0062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:2559 0 1 59 X 158 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 3 2 56 X X X X X 555 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 * 54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P 51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E 48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 644 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH43 1 1 43 X X 242 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1504
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
Appendix E
1505
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Cucamonga Creek Channel 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 10:25
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:00
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 0 3 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 *
52 2 1 52 X X X 3 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 P % Over Pace: 4% 18% 10%
49 4 4 49 X X X X X X X X 8 A
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % In Pace: 68% 80% 73% 47 4 8 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 28% 2% 17%
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH 43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 3 0 42 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 3 0 40 X X X 3
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 38 1 0 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1506
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Cucamonga Creek Channel - Archibald Avenue 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:05
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:25
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 1 57 X 1 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 6 2 54 X X X X X X X X 8
53 1 1 53 X X 2
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 4 2 51 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 6% 18% 19%
49 6 4 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 P % In Pace: 74% 68% 66%
47 4 3 47 X X X X X X X 7 A
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Under Pace: 20% 14% 15% 45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 E
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 43 2 4 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 5 42 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4
39 0 2 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1507
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 0 1 58 X 157 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 1 1 56 X X 255 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 754 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:4552 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:0549 1 2 49 X X X 3 C48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 2 3 44 X X X X X 543 1 2 43 X X X 342 1 2 42 X X X 341 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%39 1 1 39 X X 238 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%37 3 0 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
1508
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 4 1 56 X X X X X 555 2 2 55 X X X X 454 2 0 54 X X 2 Time53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:0552 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 *51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:2549 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 642 0 4 42 X X X X 441 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 0 0 39 038 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
1509
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
Appendix E
1510
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:2052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:1549 0 1 49 X 148 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH46 3 1 46 X X X X 445 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%35 0 4 35 X X X X 434 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH33 1 2 33 X X X 332 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 1 30 X 129 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1511
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 1 0 47 X 1 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 4 2 45 X X X X X X 644 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:0039 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%29 4 0 29 X X X X 428 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%27 2 2 27 X X X X 426 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%25 3 0 25 X X X 324 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1512
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
1513
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:1052 0 0 52 051 0 2 51 X X 2 Time50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:2049 1 2 49 X X X 348 0 1 48 X 1 Existing47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 4 1 46 X X X X X 545 1 0 45 X 144 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH33 2 2 33 X X X X 432 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH31 0 1 31 X 130 0 3 30 X X X 329 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH28 0 0 28 027 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH26 1 0 26 X 125 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1514
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 0 0 55 054 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 12:1552 0 0 52 051 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:4549 1 1 49 X X 248 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *45 8 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 P43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A42 8 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 14% 18% 16%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 82% 74% 78%37 1 1 37 X X 236 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 8% 6%35 1 0 35 X 134 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
1515
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:3062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:5059 3 2 59 X X X X X 558 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%47 2 1 47 X X X 346 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%45 1 1 45 X X 244 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH43 2 0 43 X X 242 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 1 40 X 139 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1516
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 2 0 55 X X 254 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:1552 1 3 52 X X X X 451 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:3549 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%39 2 0 39 X X 238 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1517
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 1 54 X X 2 Time53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:3552 0 0 52 051 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:5549 3 1 49 X X X X 448 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%37 1 2 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1518
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:3052 3 1 52 X X X X 451 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:5049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%39 0 1 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1519
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 1 48 X X 2
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 * From: 10:50
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 * Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 P To: 11:40
39 1 1 39 X X 2 A
38 7 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C Existing
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 5 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 *
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5
31 0 1 31 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 32% 6% 10%
29 3 0 29 X X X 3
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 64% 72% 64%
27 0 0 27 0
26 1 2 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 4% 22% 26%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 33 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1520
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 1 48 X 147 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 1 3 45 X X X X 444 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:2042 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:4039 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *34 0 4 34 X X X X 433 2 1 33 X X X 332 1 1 32 X X 231 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%29 2 0 29 X X 228 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1521
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 2 49 X X 248 0 1 48 X 147 0 1 47 X 1 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:2542 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:0039 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *33 1 0 33 X 132 1 3 32 X X X X 431 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1522
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 3 56 X X X 355 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:0052 0 2 52 X X 2 *51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:2049 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 0 1 42 X 141 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%39 1 0 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1523
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:0052 3 2 52 X X X X X 551 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:2549 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1524
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 0 1 44 X 1 Time43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 0 0 41 0 Time40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *35 0 2 35 X X 2 P34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 1 3 27 X X X X 426 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1525
APPENDIX F
Collision Data Table
Updated April 2025
(to be provided)
1526
1527
APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s)
Certifications (Updated April 2025)
(to be provided)
1528
1529
ORDINANCE NO. 25-XX (DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO
THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Collision Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
1530
No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 55
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 48
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 55
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 47
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 40
29 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 52
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 52
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 47
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 43
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
1531
No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 (b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the abovelisted streets are set forth herein.
Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.
The following speed limits are as established:
No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 35 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 50
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 45
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 35
29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
1532
No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 45
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 45
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 50
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 45
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 35
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 1533
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 28 day of May, 2025. __________________________________________
Michael McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Government Services Director
1534
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Government Services Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 28 of May, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 28 of May, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Government Services Director
1535
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.11
May 28, 2025
Support – H.R. 672 (Diaz-Balart), H.R. 1225 (Calvert), and S. 1455 (Scott)
Prepared By:
Alexander Fung, Economic Development Manager
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolu on to support H.R. 672 (Diaz-Balart), H.R. 1225 (Calvert), and S. 1455 (Scott).
Summary
Throughout the past two years, staff partnered with federal and state legislators to introduce bills that support the City’s independent Zoning Improvement Plan (ZIP) code advocacy efforts. Three bills were introduced in the current congressional cycle earlier this year. To further encourage the passage of these bills, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolu on to formally support the legislation. This item summarizes the details of each bill.
Background
Currently, the City shares ZIP Codes 91752 and 92880 with neighboring ci es. The City’s lack of an independent ZIP code has caused various challenges for the Eastvale community, including issues related to address mismatches, business a9rac on, community iden ty, elec on confusion, emergency management, insurance premium rates, mail delivery, and sports league participation.
Based on informa on shared by the U.S. Congressional Research Service, there are two ways for a municipality to request its ZIP code boundaries be changed:
ZIP Code Boundary Change Method 1: ZIP Code Boundary Review Process Any municipality or community group seeking a ZIP code change can submit the request in wri ng 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1536
to the USPS. The USPS will evaluate the request based on cost, mail delivery impacts, and issues related to community iden ty. If the request is granted, the USPS will arrange a mee ng with the proponent group to discuss USPS’ proposed accommoda on. Once an agreement is reached, the USPS will commission a formal survey of customers who would be affected by the proposed ZIP code change. If a simple majority of the impacted residents approve, the USPS will no fy the affected customers of the official ZIP code change by mail, then provide the impacted residents with one year to transi on their ZIP codes. In the event that a ZIP code boundary request is denied by the USPS, proponent groups have 45 days to submit appeals.
ZIP Code Boundary Change Method 2: Acts of Congress
Congress may introduce legisla on that requires the USPS to create a single ZIP code for a specified community. The most recent example of a ZIP code created by statute occurred in 2006 as part of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act. This Act granted ZIP code changes to Bradbury, CA, Discovery Bay, CA, Auburn Township, OH, and Hanahan, SC. 2023 and 2024 Advocacy Recap
Since 2022, the City has innova vely and ac vely explored various ways of partnering with the USPS and federal representa ves to resolve outstanding issues and challenges. In 2023, the City partnered with Congressmembers Ken Calvert and Norma Torres in the 118th Congress to introduce bills that would address Eastvale’s ZIP code challenges, in addi on to partnering with the City of Castle Pines in Colorado to launch the Na onal ZIP Code Advocacy Coali on. The Coali on now provides a plaForm for jurisdic ons that are experiencing similar ZIP code challenges to share best prac ces and partner with one another. Addi onal informa on regarding the Coali on can be found at https://www.eastvaleca.gov/community/national-zip-code-advocacy-coalition.
With the support from Senator Alex Padilla, Former Senator Laphonza Butler, and Congressmembers Ken Calvert and Norma Torres, the City successfully convinced the USPS via the USPS’ ZIP Code Boundary Review Process to change ZIP Code 92880’s designa on from “Corona” to “Eastvale.” The change was implemented on January 1, 2024, as displayed on the USPS website. While ZIP Code 92880’s municipal designa on was changed and some of the City’s outstanding issues have been resolved, the City continues to experience challenges due to the lack of an independent ZIP code.
Analysis
The 119th Congress began on January 3, 2025 and will end on January 2, 2027. As a result, bills that are introduced in the current congressional cycle have un l January 2, 2027 to pass through both chambers of Congress and be signed by the President. Due to the strong partnerships that were previously built with federal legislators in the 118th Congress, Eastvale is already included in three ZIP code bills in the first few months of the current congressional cycle.
Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL-26) introduced H.R. 672 on January 23, 2025 to direct the USPS to establish new ZIP codes for several ci es and communi es across the na on, including Eastvale. Upon the bill’s passage, the USPS must designate new ZIP codes for these ci es and communi es within 270 days. This bill is co-sponsored by a dozen Congressmembers, including Congressman Ken Calvert (R-CA-41) and Congresswoman Norma Torres (D-CA-35). H.R. 672 was passed by the House Commi9ee on Oversight and Government Reform on May 21, 2025. Addi onal informa on regarding H.R. 672 can be found on h9ps://www.congress.gov/bill/119thcongress/house-bill/672. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1537
H.R. 672’s Senate companion bill, S. 1455, was introduced by Senator Rick Sco9 (R-FL) on April 10, 2025. S. 1455’s bill language largely mirrors the language of H.R. 672. The bill is co-sponsored by Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA). S. 1455 has been read twice and referred to the Senate Commi9ee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Addi onal informa on regarding S. 1455 can be found on https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1455.
Addi onally, Congressman Ken Calvert introduced H.R. 1225 on February 12, 2025 to direct the USPS to designate a single and unique ZIP code for Eastvale. Upon the bill’s passage, the USPS must designate a new and independent ZIP code for Eastvale within 180 days. The bill is co-sponsored by Congresswoman Norma Torres and has been referred to the House Commi9ee on Oversight and Government Reform. Addi onal informa on regarding H.R. 1225 can be found on https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1225.
Environmental
Pursuant to Sec on 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, organiza onal or administra ve ac vi es of governments that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment are not considered as CEQA projects.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: B | Goal #: C Suppor ng H.R. 672, H.R. 1225, and S. 1455 can support the City to develop branding and iden ty for Eastvale by advocating for the City to have an independent ZIP code.
Fiscal Impact
Adopting a resolution to support the three bills does not result in any direct fiscal impacts.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On March 22, 2023, the City Council voted to support H.R. 696 (Calvert), H.R. 860 (Diaz-Balart), and SJR 3 (Roth) and authorized the City Manager to submit the necessary le9ers of support to encourage the passage of these bills. H.R. 696 and H.R. 860 were introduced in the previous congressional legisla ve session to address Eastvale’s ZIP code challenges, while SJR 3 was a California state resolution that affirmed the need for Eastvale to obtain an independent ZIP code.
Addi onally, the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the Public Safety Commission receive presenta ons on the City’s independent ZIP code advocacy efforts on a periodic basis. The previous update was provided to the City Council on December 11, 2024.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Proposed Resolution
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1538
RESOLUTION NO. 25-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING H.R. 672 (DIAZ-BALART), H.R. 1225 (CALVERT), AND S. 1455 (SCOTT).
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale shares Zoning Improvement Plan (ZIP) Codes 91752 and 92880 with neighboring jurisdictions, causing various challenges for the Eastvale community, including issues related to address mismatches, business attraction, community identity, election confusion, emergency management, insurance premium rate increases, mail delivery, and sports league participation; WHEREAS, the City has partnered with Senators and Congressmembers in the United States Congress to introduce and support bills that support the City’s independent ZIP code advocacy efforts;
WHEREAS, the 119th Congress began on January 3, 2025 and will end on January 2, 2027; WHEREAS, Florida Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart introduced H.R. 672 on January 23, 2025 to direct the USPS to establish new ZIP codes for several cities and communities across the nation, including Eastvale, CA;
WHEREAS, H.R. 672’s Senate companion bill, S. 1455, was introduced by Florida Senator Rick Scott on April 10, 2025;
WHEREAS, California Congressman Ken Calvert introduced H.R. 1225 on February 12, 2025 to direct the USPS to designate a single and unique ZIP code for Eastvale; and WHEREAS, the City will be granted a unique and independent ZIP code if one of these bills is signed into law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. SUPPORT H.R. 672 (DIAZ-BALART), AS AMENDED ON MAY 28, 2025.
SECTION 2. SUPPORT H.R. 1225 (CALVERT), AS AMENDED ON MAY 28, 2025.
SECTION 3. SUPPORT S. 1455 (SCOTT), AS AMENDED ON MAY 28, 2025. 1539
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28TH day of May, 2025. __________________________________________
Mike McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney Government Services Director/City Clerk
1540
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 25-XX, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the 28th day of May 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
Government Services Director/City Clerk
1541
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.12
May 28, 2025
Partnership Agreement with the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department for Emergency Services Coordinator (ESC) Services
Prepared By:
Simone Blackwell, Senior Environmental Compliance Analyst Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve a partnership Agreement with the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department in the amount of $292,500 over three years; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract amendment and other necessary documents.
Summary
The City currently has an agreement with the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department (EMD) for Emergency Services Coordinator (ESC) services, which is set to expire on June 30, 2025. To ensure con0nued services, the County has proposed a new three-year agreement for ESC services, effective July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028 for total of $292,500.
Background
Since 2011, the City has partnered with the County of Riverside EMD to provide ESC services suppor0ng emergency planning, mi0ga0on, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. In 2024, the City Council approved to increase the level of dedicated ESC services from a shared model to 50% coverage, following the elimination of the City’s Emergency Management Specialist position. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1542
The current agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2025. To ensure con0nuity of ESC services, the County has proposed a new three-year agreement, effec0ve July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028.
Staff recommends the con0nued selec0on of Service Level III ESC services. Under the proposed agreement, the annual cost for Service Level III will increase from $80,000 to $97,500 per fiscal year.
This increase is the result of a periodic review of service rates conducted by the County AuditorController’s Office to ensure rates are based on a reasonable methodology and reflect the full cost of providing services on an ongoing basis.
Service level III includes a dedicated ESC on-site 20 hours per week. Specific ESC responsibili0es include, but are not limited to California Emergency Services Act Compliance, hos0ng Community Emergency Response Team courses (CERT), CERT volunteer management, grant management, regular reviews and updates of various Emergency Management Plans (ex. Emergency Opera0ons Plan, Local Hazard Mi0ga0on Plan, Disaster Recovery Plan, etc.). Addi0onally, this posi0on interacts heavily with the community and is oDen requested to aFend various mee0ngs and provide presentations. This role also ensures City staff receives adequate emergency preparedness training.
Environmental
Not Applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: A | Goal #: F Maintain Fire response
Fiscal Impact
The County charges for this posi0on on a fixed fee schedule (Exhibit B). The City's contribu0on falls under Service Level III - 50% ESC services. The total cost is increasing from $80,000 to $97,500 per fiscal year. Funds for fire services are paid through the City's Fire Structural Fund, which comes from a por0on of the City's property tax allocated for fire service. Budget is allocated in the Fire Fund Payments to Other Agencies account number 110-420-6480.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On June 9, 2021, the City Council approved a three year partnership agreement with the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department for Emergency Management services.
On June 26, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to extend the agreement to June 30, 2025 and increase ESC services to 50%.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - ESC Partnership Agreement
Attachment 2 - County of Riverside Board of Supervisors EMD Service Template and Rates Approval Attachment 3 - 2025 Jurisdictional Partnership Matrix of Services 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1543
Agreement No.
AGREEMENT FOR
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT UNIFIED SERVICES
BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF EASTVALE (AGENCY)
This Agreement is made as of __________________ between the County of Riverside ("County") and the City of Eastvale ("Agency"). The parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is effective for three years, starting July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028.
2. Through its Emergency Management Department ("EMD"), the County shall provide to the Agency the services of an Emergency Services Coordinator ("EMD Unified Services (EMDUS)") as described in Exhibits A, B, C & D.
3. The Agency shall pay the County for these EMDUS as stated in Exhibit B.
4. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice to the other party.
The Agreement may be terminated with cause upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. The County shall be entitled to receive compensation for all properly provided services rendered prior to termination.
5. If the Agency does not appropriate funds in its budget for payment, the Agency shall immediately notify the County in writing that such funds are not forthcoming. Such a notice shall be deemed cause for termination by the County or Agency. The County shall nevertheless be entitled to payment for properly provided services rendered prior to termination.
6. At all times during the performance period of this Agreement, the County shall maintain insurance or selfinsurance reasonable and appropriate for a public entity the size of the County.
7. The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the Agency, its departments, agencies, districts, officials, officers, and employees from any liability, claim, damage, or action based or asserted upon any act or omission of the County relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, personal injury or death.
8. The Agency shall indemnify and hold harmless the County, its departments, agencies, districts, officials, officers, and employees from any liability, claim, damage, or action based or asserted upon any act or omission of the Agency relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, personal injury, or death.
9. The County shall maintain and keep records related to the EMDUS rendered in accordance with applicable County standards. In addition to their rights under applicable law, the Agency and its employees and agents shall have the right to review and audit such records during the County's normal business hours upon request and reasonable advance notice by the Agency.
10. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement. The venue shall be in an appropriate court located in Riverside County, and the parties waive any provision of the law providing for a change of venue to 1544
Agreement No.