REGULAR CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752
Regular City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority: 6:30 PM Wednesday, June 25, 2025
City Councilmembers
Michael McMinn, Mayor/Chair
Jocelyn Yow, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair
Christian Dinco, Councilmember/Board Member
Clint Lorimore, Councilmember/Board Member
Todd Rigby, Councilmember/Board Member
Mark Orme, City Manager/Executive Director
Erica Vega, City Attorney/General Counsel
Marc Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk/Secretary This Agenda contains a brief general descrip+on of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no ac+on or direc+on shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following Agenda. Unless legally privileged, all suppor+ng documents, including staff reports, and any wri+ngs or documents provided to a majority of the City Council a0er the pos+ng of this agenda are available for review at Eastvale City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Eastvale, CA 91752 or you may contact the City Clerk’s Office, at (951) 361-0900 Monday through Thursday from 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and available online at www.eastvaleca.gov.
Members of the public can observe the mee+ng by viewing the live-stream at www.eastvaleca.gov and may provide public comment by sending comments to the City Clerk's Office by email at [email protected]. Staff will monitor emails to the extent possible during the mee+ng and provide comments as possible. All comments will be made part of the record. Comments will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Mayor’s discre+on to reduce +me on public comment. All comments should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking +me. If a comment is received before the agenda item is heard but before the close of the mee+ng, the comment will all be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record.
If you are a person with a disability and need an accommoda+on to par+cipate in the City of Eastvale programs, services, ac+vi+es, and mee+ngs, contact Maricela Mejia [email protected] or (951)703-4433 at least 72 business hours in advance to request an auxiliary aid or accommodation.
Regular mee+ngs are recorded and made available on the City’s website atwww.eastvaleca.gov. Mee+ng recordings are uploaded to the City’s website within 24 hours (unless otherwise noted) after the completion of the meeting. 1 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT
Any member of the public may address the Council on items within the Council’s subject matter jurisdiction, but which are not listed on this agenda during PUBLIC COMMENTS. However, no action may be taken on matters that are not part of the posted agenda. We request comments made on the agenda be made at the time the item is considered and that comments be limited to three minutes per person with a maximum of six minutes (time may be donated by one person). Please address your comments to the Council and do not engaged in dialogue with individual Council Members, City staff, or members of the audience. Blue speaker forms are available at the front table to the entrance of Council Chambers.
4. CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
5. INVOCATION
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS
The City Council may only add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the agency subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Council. If there is less than 2/3 of the Council members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of each section unless otherwise noted.
8. PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
8.1. Eastvale Volunteer Recognitions
8.2. Parks & Recreation Month Proclamation
8.3. Introduction of Brandon Pong - Landscape & Facilities Maintenance Worker
8.4. Introduction of Amani Mahmoud – Management Assistant
9. AGENCY PARTNER UPDATES
9.1. Eastvale Library Update
9.2. YMCA Update
2 10. PUBLIC COMMENT
Any member of the public may address the Council on items within the Council’s subject matter jurisdiction, but which are not listed on this agenda during PUBLIC COMMENTS. However, no action may be taken on matters that are not part of the posted agenda. We request comments made on the agenda be made at the time the item is considered and that comments be limited to three minutes per person with a maximum of six minutes (time may be donated by one person). Please address your comments to the Council and do not engaged in dialogue with individual Councilmembers, City staff, or members of the audience. Blue speaker forms are available at the front table to the entrance of Council Chambers.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are normally enacted in one motion. The Mayor or City Council may remove a Consent Calendar item for separate action. If a member of the public would like to speak on a Consent Calendar item, please complete a blue “Public Comment Form” and submit to the City Clerk prior to the item.
11.1. City Council Meeting Minutes
Submitted by: Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council meeting minutes from the regular meeting on June 11, 2025.
11.2. Treasurer’s Report: May 2025
Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer’s Report.
11.3. Planning Division Update
Submitted by: David Murray, City Planner
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Planning Division Update.
11.4. Public Works Department Update
Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Public Works Department update.
11.5. City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – April 2025
Submitted by: Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Eastvale Crime Statistics for April 2025.
11.6. Approval of Renewal of Cartegraph for Public Works Asset Management Software Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of Cartegraph, Public Works Asset Management Software, in the amount of $48,058.32 for FY25-26 annual subscription.
11.7. Purchase of One Skid Steer Loader for Use by City of Eastvale Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the purchase of one (1) Caterpillar (CAT) 262D3 Skid Steer Loader in Fiscal Year 2025-26 and attachments in an amount not to exceed $124,807.99; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents including a purchase order to complete the purchase.
11.8. Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading and adopt the Ordinance, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF
THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
11.9. Adoption of Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budget
Submitted by: Mark Orme, City Manager & Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
4 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the following:
1. Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budget; and
2. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Approving and Adopting the Annual Appropriations Limit Pursuant to Article XIII (B) of the California Constitution for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and
3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Adopting An Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget for the Fiscal Year Commencing July 1, 2025 and Ending June 30, 2026, and Appropriating Funds for Purposes Therein Set Forth; and
4. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Approving the Commitment of Fund Balance Pursuant to GASB 54; and
5. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Establishing Revised Salary Schedules and Range Tables Effective July 1, 2025; and
6. A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Establishing the Authorized Positions for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026, Effective July 1, 2025.
11.10. Approval of Maintenance Services Agreement with MCE Corporation Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Recommended Action(s):
1. Approve the Agreement with MCE Corporation for maintenance services in an amount not to exceed $200,000 per fiscal year for the initial three-year term, with the option to renew for up to two (2) one-year extensions; and
2. Approve an exemption from the requirement for formal bidding pursuant to Eastvale Municipal Code Section 4.06.080(i); and
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
11.11. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Robb R. Steel for FY 2025-2026 Economic Development and Community Development Consultation Services Submitted by: Caleb Zaldana, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Robb R. Steel in an amount not-to-exceed $56,500 for economic and community development consultation services from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026.
11.12. Approval of Agreement with Priority Building Services, LLC for Citywide Janitorial Services
Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve an Agreement with Priority Building Services, LLC for Citywide Janitorial Services in a not-to-exceed amount of $75,000 per fiscal year; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents for an initial three-year term, with the option to renew for up to two (2) one-year extensions in the amount not-to-exceed $75,000 per fiscal year, contingent upon satisfactory performance.
11.13. Approval of Nearmap Geographical Information System Software Contract Renewal
Submitted by: Alexander Fung, Economic Development Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of the City’s contract with Nearmap US, Inc. for a period of two additional years from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2027.
11.14. Approval of the Credit Agreement for the Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) for Zone D – Hamner and Limonite Avenues Median and Limonite Street related to Tract Map 38920, The New Home Company, LLC.
Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Credit Agreement for the Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) for Zone D – Hamner and Limonite Avenues Median and Limonite Streets related to Tract Map 38920 and authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
11.15. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Breaking the Chains Consulting for FY 2025-2026 Organizational Development Services
Submitted by: Maricela Mejia, Assistant HR/Risk Management Director RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Breaking the Chains Consulting in the amount of $40,000.00 for organizational development consulting services from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. and any other documents necessary to effectuate the purchase of services.
11.16. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP for Bond and Disclosure Services
Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer 6 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement Amendment with Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, LLP with a revised scope and total not-to-exceed amount of $110,500; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
11.17. Adoption of the 2025 Strategic Plan
Submitted by: Stephanie Vasquez, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the updated 2025 Strategic Plan.
11.18. Update to the Claims Procedure Policy
Submitted by: Maricela Mejia, Assistant Human Resources & Risk Management Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution amending the Claims Procedure Policy.
11.19. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, Adopting the Efficiency and Innovation Partnership Program and Authorizing Management Incentive Pay for Executive Team Members While Overseeing An Assignment Under The Program
Submitted by: Maricela Mejia, Assistant Human Resources & Risk Management Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
That the City Council adopt the “Resolution of The City Council of The City of Eastvale, California, Adopting The Efficiency And Innovation Partnership Program and Authorizing Management Incentive Pay For Executive Team Members While Overseeing an Assignment Under the Program.”
12. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The public is encouraged to express your views on any matter set for public hearing. It is our procedure to first receive the staff report, then to ask for public testimony, first from those in favor of the project followed by testimony from those in opposition to it, and if there is opposition, to allow those in favor, rebuttal testimony only as to the points brought up in opposition. To testify on the matter, you need to simply come forward to the speaker’s podium at the appropriate time, give your name and address and make your statement. After a hearing is closed, you may not further speak on the matter unless requested to do so or are asked questions by the Mayor or a Councilmember. Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes each with a maximum of six (6) minutes (time may be donated by one speaker.)
12.1. Approving the Annual Reports; Confirming the Diagram and Assessment; Ordering the Levy for Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts and Benefit Assessment 7 Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; and Ordering the Dissolution of Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 89-1C Zone 10, No. 89-1C Zone 33, and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2001-1 Zone W
Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing and:
1. Adopt a Resolu+on Approving the Annual Reports, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy for the Following Districts:
Landscaping and Ligh+ng Maintenance Districts No. 89-1 Consolidated, No. 2014-1, No. 2014-3, No. 2014-4, Illumina+on District No. 2 (Subareas: 35, 42, 46, 49, And 55), Ligh+ng Maintenance District No. 98-2, Ligh+ng Maintenance District No. 2001-1 (Zones: G and S), Ligh+ng Maintenance District No. 2001-2 (Zones: A-H, J-K, And M), and Ligh+ng Maintenance District No. 2001-3 (Zones:
A-MMM); and
2. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Report, Confirming the Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy for Benefit Assessment District No. 2014-2 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
12.2. Adoption of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2025/2026 - 2029/2030
Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing and adopt a resolution approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2025/2026 - 2029/2030.
12.3. Adoption of Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Development Impact Fee Schedule
Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Conduct Public Hearing and Adopt a Resolution Adopting Development Impact Fees for Park Improvements, Community and Recreation Centers, Library, City Hall, Police Station, and Fire Department Facilities; and Adopting a Nexus Study and Capital Improvement Plan to Support the Development Impact Fees; and
2. Introduce the Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 110.28 (DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM) AND SECTION 130.20.020 (PARK AND RECREATION FEES AND DEDICATIONS) OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE.
12.4. Issuance of Eastvale Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series 2025A Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer 8 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the:
1. City Council hold a public hearing with respect to the issuance of the 2025A Bonds;
2. City Council Approve and Adopt a Resolu+on authorizing the issuance of Eastvale Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, authorizing the execu+on and delivery of a Ground Lease, Lease Agreement, Indenture, Con+nuing Disclosure Agreement and Bond Purchase Agreement in connec+on with the issuance of such bonds, authorizing the distribu+on of an Official Statement in connec+on with the offering and sale of such bonds and authorizing the execu+on of necessary documents and cer+ficates and related actions; and
3. Eastvale Public Financing Authority approve and adopt a Resolu+on authorizing the issuance of Eastvale Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, authorizing the execu+on and delivery of a Ground Lease, Lease Agreement, Indenture, Assignment Agreement and Bond Purchase Agreement in connec+on with the issuance of such bonds, authorizing the distribu+on of an Official Statement in connec+on with the offering and sale of such bonds and authorizing the execu+on of necessary documents and cer+ficates and related actions.
13. CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BUSINESS
13.1. Construction Contract Award to Clark Construction Group and Professional Services Agreements Approval with Geocon West, Inc. for the Eastvale Civic Center project
Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt the attached resolution approving the project plans and specifications and awarding the Construction Contract to Clark Construction Group - California LP, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the amount of $135,151,000 plus a 10% contingency of $13,515,100 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $148,666,100;
2. Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Geocon West, Inc. in the amount of $131,770 plus a 10% contingency of $13,177 for a total not-toexceed amount of $144,947 for the geotechnical observation and testing services;
3. Approve the payment of water and sewer capacity charges to Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) in the amount of $1,271,632.75; and
4. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to complete the project, including, but not limited to, the Notice of Completion.
13.2. Establishing a Community Facilities District (CFD) and Authorizing the Levy of 9 Special Taxes Therein – Community Facilities District No. 2025-01 (Limonite) Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve and Adopt the Resolution Declaring Results of a Special Election and Directing the Recording of a Special Tax Lien for Community Facilities District No. 2025-01 (Limonite); and
2. Introduce the proposed Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL FO THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAXES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CITY OF EASTVALE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-01 (LIMONITE))
14. CITY MANAGER/CITY STAFF REPORT
15. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMITTEE REPORTS
16. ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Eastvale City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, August 13, at 6:30 p.m. at Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752.
17. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing Agenda was posted at the following locations: City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910 and website of the City of Eastvale (www.eastvaleca.gov,) not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
______________________________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
10 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 1
MINUTES
CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
Regular Meeting: 5:30 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900
Eastvale, CA 91752
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Eastvale City Council Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor McMinn.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Christian Dinco, Clint Lorimore, Todd Rigby, Mayor Pro Tem Jocelyn Yow, and Mayor Mike McMinn.
Absent:
City Staff
Present: City Manager Mark Orme, City Attorney Erica Vega, and Government Services Director/City Clerk Marc Donohue were present at Roll Call. Other staff members were present.
3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT – None
4. CLOSED SESSION ITEM
4.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: Bradshaw v. City of Eastvale, et al. (Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. CVRI2205633)
At the conclusion of closed session, City Attorney Vega stated that the City Council voted to approve the settlement agreement, which includes a complete release of all claims against the city, for the amount of $45,000.
4.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Government Code Sec on 54956.8).
Property: Lots 10 and 63 of Tract Map No. 38594 recorded on March 15, 2024. Agency Negotiator: Community Development Director Gustavo Gonzalez Negotiating Parties: The 11 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 2
New Home Company; Arroyo Cap III-2, LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
At the conclusion of closed session, City Attorney Vega stated that there was no reportable action.
5. INVOCATION
Pastor Rob Norris from The Crossings Church offered the invocation.
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Dinco led the Pledge of Allegiance.
7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS
City staff requested to add a Presentation item titled: Recognition of CERT Program Graduates.
There was consensus by the City Council to add a Presentation item titled: Recognition of CERT Program Graduates.
8. PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
8.1 Recognition of CALED Awards
Jennifer Hiramoto, the Chair of CALED/Executive Director of the Ontario Economic Development Agency, presented CALED Awards to the city.
8.2 Business First Walks Recognitions
Certificates were presented to Riverside Sheriff's Office, Riverside County Workforce Development, the Eastvale Chamber of Commerce, and city staff.
8.3 Recognition of CERT Program Graduates
Certificates were presented to the CERT Program graduates.
9. AGENCY PARTNER UPDATES – None
10. PUBLIC COMMENT
The following individuals provided public comment:
Tami Friedrich (via e-mail)
Hari Dhiman, Eastvale Chamber of Commerce
12 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 3
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Councilmember Lorimore second by Councilmember Rigby, the City Council voted unanimously to approve the Consent Calendar.
11.1 City Council Meeting Minutes
The City Council approved the meeting minutes from the regular meeting on May 28, 2025.
11.2 The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 SB 1 – Project List for FY 25/26 The City Council adopted Resolution 25-30, adopting a list of projects for fiscal year 2025-26 funded by SB 1.
11.3 Approval of Contract Amendment with GeoCon West Inc. for the Geotechnical Investigation and Material Testing Services for the 2024 Slurry Seal Project The City Council:
1. Approved the contract amendment with Geocon West Inc. (Geocon) to provide additional compensation for geotechnical services in the amount of $3,905 for a total do-not-exceed amount of $26,300; and
2. Authorized the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
11.4 Award a Construction Contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc. and a Professional Services Agreement to ZK Consultants, Inc. for 2024 Annual Asphalt Concrete Overlay Project
The City Council:
1. Approved the contract with Hardy & Harper, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the amount of $1,978,000 plus 10% contingency of $197,800 for the not-to-exceed total of $2,175,800 for the 2024 Annual Asphalt Concrete Overlay Project;
2. Approved the Professional Services Agreement with Z&K Consultants, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $77,696; and
3. Authorized the City Manager to execute all necessary documents including Notice of Completion.
11.5 Renewal of the Local Responsibility Area Wildland Protection Reimbursement Agreement from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
The City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with the California Department of Forestry and Fire protection services in an amount not to 13 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 4
exceed $69,980.74 for FY 2025/2026 for Fire Protection services within the local responsibility areas within the City.
11.6 League of California Cities 2025 Annual Conference Delegate and Alternate(s) & City Council Meeting Schedule
The City Council:
1. Appointed Mayor McMinn as the delegate and Mayor Pro Tem Yow as the alternate at the League of California Cities’ 2025 Annual Conference; and
2. Rescheduled the Regular City Council meeting of Wednesday, October 8, 2025, to Tuesday, October 7, 2025.
12. PUBLIC HEARINGS
12.1 Placement of Delinquent Solid Waste Collection and Handling Service Charges on the Property Tax Roll
Senior Environmental Compliance Analyst Blackwell presented the item and answered related questions.
Mayor McMinn opened the public comment period. Hearing no response, Mayor McMinn closed the public comment period.
On motion of Councilmember Lorimore and second by Mayor McMinn, the City Council voted unanimously to:
1. Adopt Resolution 25-31, authorizing the collection of delinquent solid waste handling service charges on the property tax roll; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute any necessary documentation to facilitate property tax roll placement of delinquent solid waste handling service charges.
13. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
13.1 Draft Proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budget Review
City Manager Orme and Finance Director/City Treasurer Wells presented a PowerPoint presentation and answered related questions.
Mayor McMinn opened the public comment period. Hearing no response, Mayor McMinn closed the public comment period.
The City Council conducted a study session, reviewed, provided recommendations on the draft proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budget, and provided direction to staff to bring back an analysis and cost estimate for replacement trees in the City.
14 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 5
13.2 Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Principal Engineer Choi presented a PowerPoint presentation and answered related questions.
Mayor McMinn opened the public comment period. Hearing no response, Mayor McMinn closed the public comment period.
On motion of Councilmember Rigby and second by Mayor McMinn, the City Council voted unanimously to introduce Ordinance 25-06 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER
10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS.
13.3 Eastvale Schools Committee Appointments
Government Services Director/City Clerk Donohue provided a verbal presentation and answered related questions.
Mayor McMinn opened the public comment period. Hearing no response, Mayor McMinn closed the public comment period.
On motion of Councilmember Rigby and second by Mayor Pro Tem Yow, the City Council voted unanimously to:
1. Appoint Mayor McMinn to serve as a primary member of the Eastvale Schools Committee; and
2. Appoint Councilmember Lorimore to serve as an alternate member of the Eastvale Schools Committee.
14. CITY MANAGER/CITY STAFF REPORT
City Manager Orme provided an update on upcoming City events.
15. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMITTEE REPORTS
15.1 League of California Cities
Councilmember Lorimore provided a report.
15.2 Southern California Association of Governments
Councilmember Lorimore provided a report.
15.3 Western Riverside Council of Governments
15 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
June 11, 2025 Page - 6
Councilmember Dinco provided a report.
15.4 Riverside Transit Agency
Mayor Pro Tem Yow provided a report.
15.5 Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District
No report was provided.
15.6 Riverside County Transportation Commission
Councilmember Lorimore provided a report.
15.7 Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority No report was provided.
15.8 Finance Committee
No report was provided.
15.9 Eastvale Schools Committee
No report was provided.
15.10 Business and Development Success Ad-Hoc Committee No report was provided.
15.11 Eastvale Legislative Ad-Hoc Committee
No report was provided.
15.12 Eastvale Community Services Ad-Hoc Committee
No report was provided.
15.13 City Council Communications
The City Council provided comments.
Councilmember Dinco requested an update on current recruitments, the third fire station, and parks in the city.
ADJOURNMENT – Mayor McMinn adjourned the regular meeting at 8:45 P.M. The next regular meeting of the Eastvale City Council Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 25, 2025, at 6:30 P.M.
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
16 AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.2
June 25, 2025
Treasurer’s Report: May 2025
Prepared By:
Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer’s Report.
Summary
In accordance with the City of Eastvale’s Investment Policy, adopted July 24, 2024, the City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly treasurer’s report to the City Council. The report shall include types of investments, credit ra*ngs, ins*tu*ons involved, dates of purchases, dates of maturity, amount of deposits or cost of the security, current market value of the securi*es, interest rates, investment fund balances, and a statement as to whether investments are in compliance with the Investment Policy and whether there are sufficient funds to meet the City’s cash obliga*ons for the next six months.
Background
The Schedule of Investments includes a breakdown of the City’s investments by “Ac*ve” or “Inac*ve” Deposits. “Ac*ve Deposits” are those accounts which receive revenues, whereas “Inac*ve Deposits” are available for use but are not earning revenues. Detail reports for the PFM Managed Investment Por2olio, with all supplemental informa*on required by the City’s investment policy, are included in the report.
The Dash Board Report Card, consists of two sections:
I. Por2olio Diversifica*on – This sec*on reflects the diversifica*on of the City of Eastvale’s por2olio by both type of instrument and length of maturity.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
17 II. Por2olio Performance Measures – This sec*on compares budget to actuals in for interest earnings. Also included is a cash breakdown report per the City’s fund balance reserve policy showing funds restricted, commi@ed, designated, and unassigned in addi*on to investment income received as of May 31, 2025, broken down by investment type. The City of Eastvale’s Schedule of Investments complies with the City’s Investment Policy. The City has sufficient funds to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Total cash and investments as of the end of May are $270,370,015 (book value). Ac*ve deposits total $262,369,797; inac*ve deposits total $8,000,218. Net investment income received for fiscal year 2024-25 through the end of May (eleven months of the fiscal year) is $7,870,995. The net annualized yield on investments is 4.266%.
Environmental
Government investment reports are not considered a Project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A The Treasurer's Report is an activity required by the city's investment policy.
Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Investment Report: May 2025
Attachment 2 - PFM Statement: May 2025
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
18 Introduction
Month Ending
Active Deposits
Ending Book
Value
Inactive
Deposits
Ending Book
Value Interest*
Realized
Gain/(Loss)
Yield at
Cost
June 30, 2024 $ 217,052,100 $ 12,027,115 $ 502,116 $ (84,053) 3.457% July 31, 2024 219,078,760 12,005,719 707,498 (30,789) 3.470% August 31, 2024 224,269,130 12,000,700 578,085 (6,426) 4.343% September 30, 2024 220,619,776 12,000,700 522,756 (34,977) 4.423% October 31, 2024 224,608,968 13,782,141 1,010,209 (6,859) 4.287% November 30, 2024 224,951,865 12,000,700 496,917 (3,359) 4.166% December 31, 2024 231,737,006 12,006,426 539,795 (1,210) 3.983% January 31, 2025 237,042,136 12,022,010 1,189,848 (22,048) 3.828% February 28, 2025 246,798,563 12,000,000 521,425 (3,188) 3.854% March 31, 2025 253,346,989 8,000,000 533,139 (17,538) 4.198% April 30, 2025 254,899,446 8,001,373 1,297,244 (2,205) 4.235% May 31, 2025 262,369,797 8,000,218 542,829 (29,916) 0.000%
CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
In accordance with the City Investment Policy, a quarterly investment report shall be filed with the City Council which provides a clear picture of the status of the current investments. The report for the month ending May 31, 2025 has been prepared by City Staff. We hereby certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy. Combined with anticipated revenues, the portfolio contains sufficient investment liquidity to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
12 MONTH BALANCES
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 1 19 Schedule of Investments
Par Value
Book Value Price
@ Cost
(Fair Value)
Market Value Yield
Money Market Accounts:
Citizens Business Bank - Money Market $ - $ - $ - 0.100% First American Govt Oblig Fund CI Y 67,831 67,831 67,831 3.910% Total Money Market $ 67,831 $ 67,831 $ 67,831 3.910%
Sweep Accounts:
Citizens Business Bank - General Sweep $ 15,216,390 $ 15,216,390 $ 15,216,390 0.100% Total Sweep Accounts $ 15,216,390 $ 15,216,390 $ 15,216,390 0.100% Pooled Investment Accounts:
CAMP Pool $ 134,509,005 $ 134,509,005 $ 134,509,005 4.420% Local Agency Investment Fund* 72,591,820 72,591,820 61,846,159 4.480% Total Pooled Investment $ 207,100,825 $ 207,100,825 $ 196,355,164 4.441% PFM Managed Investment Portfolio:
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note $ 21,305,000 $ 20,623,616 $ 20,918,299 3.330% U.S. Treasury Bill - - - 0.000%
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note - - - 0.000%
Municipal Bond / Note 285,000 285,566 284,202 1.220%
Federal Agency Commercial 8,067,439 8,012,470 8,147,437 4.820% Asset-Back Security / Collateralized 2,593,842 2,593,505 2,610,529 4.960% Certificate of Deposit 360,000 360,000 364,385 5.080%
Federal Agency Bond / Note - - - 0.540%
Bank Note 925,000 925,020 937,570 5.480%
Corporate Note 7,236,000 7,184,574 7,231,788 4.280%
Total PFM Managed Investments $ 40,772,281 $ 39,984,751 $ 40,494,210 3.955% $ 263,157,326 $ 262,369,797 $ 252,133,595 4.115%
Checking Account:
Citizens Business Bank - General Account $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218 0.000% Citizens Business Bank - HdL Holding $ - $ - $ - 0.000% Total Inactive Deposits $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218 0.000% $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218 $ 8,000,218
$ 271,157,545 $ 270,370,015 $ 260,133,813
*yield as of the prior quarter end
CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
GRAND TOTAL CASH
Institution
ACTIVE DEPOSITS TOTAL
INACTIVE DEPOSITS TOTAL
INACTIVE DEPOSITS
ACTIVE DEPOSITS
Per Government Code requirements, the Investment Report is in compliance with the City of Eastvale's Investment Policy, and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next six months.
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 2 20 Dash Board Report Card
I. PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
Money Market 0.03%
Sweep 6.04%
LAIF 24.53%
CAMP Pool 53.35%
Certificates of Deposit 0.14%
U.S. Treasury Bond/ Note 8.30%
U.S. Treasury Bill 0.00%
Supra-National Agency Bond/Note 0.00%
Municipal Bond / Note 0.11%
Federal Agency Collaterized Mortgage 3.23%
Asset-Backed Security/ Collateralized 1.04%
Federal Agency Bond/ Note 0.00%
Bank Note 0.37%
Corporate Note 2.87%
100.00%
Less Than 90 Days 84.05%
90 days to Six Months (26 Weeks) 0.05%
Six Months to One Year (52 Weeks) 1.87%
One to Two Years (104 Weeks) 2.27%
Two to Three Years (156 Weeks) 3.65%
Three to Four Years (208 Weeks) 3.60%
Four to Five Years 4.51%
Five Years + 0.00%
100.00%
II. PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Yield at Cost - May 31, 2025 4.115%
Annual Investment Income Budget $ 6,359,578 A
Investment Income Received - YTD 05/31/2025 7,908,956 B Less Investment Fees (37,961) C
Net Investment Income Received - YTD 05/31/2025 $ 7,870,995 B+C Over/(Under) Annual Budget $ 1,511,417 C-B
% of Annual Budget 123.766%
Net Yield Annualized at Cost - May 31, 2025 4.266%
CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
DIVERSIFICATION BY INSTRUMENT
DIVERSIFICATION BY MATURITY
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 3 21 Dash Board Report Card
Active Investments: Diversification by Maturity
Active Investments: Diversification by Investment
CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 >5 % of Portfolio
Maturity in Years
First American Govt Oblig Fund CI Y
0.03%
CAMP Pool
56.77%
Local Agency Investment Fund
26.10%
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
8.83%
U.S. Treasury Bill
0.00%
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
0.00%
Municipal Bond / Note
0.12%
Federal Agency Commercial
3.44%
Asset-Back Security /
Collateralized
1.10%
Certificate of Deposit
0.15%
Federal Agency Bond / Note
0.00%
Bank Note
0.40%
Corporate Note
3.05%
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 4 22 Dash Board Report Card
CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
All Activity: Year Over Year Interest Income
-
1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
5.00 6.00
7.00 8.00
9.00 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 YTD Net Interest Income Received
Millions
Fiscal Year
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 5 23 Cash Breakdown per Fund Balance Reserve Policy
Schedule of Investments - May 31, 2025
Money Market Accounts $ 67,831
Sweep Accounts 15,216,390
Pooled Investment Accounts 207,100,825
PFM Managed Investments 39,984,751
Checking Account 8,000,218
Grand Total Cash - May 31, 2025 $ 270,370,015
Breakdown of Total Cash at May 31, 2025
Non-Spendable & Restricted Funds (Non-Discretionary Per Law): $ 78,330,699 per 06/30/2024 audited financials
Committed (Formal Action of City Council): 128,710,029
per fiscal year 2024-25 mid-year budget
Assigned (City's Intent):
per fiscal year 2024-25 mid-year budget
Fire Operations
per fiscal year 2024-25 mid-year budget 9,296,150
General Fund Emergency Contingency:
per fund balance reserve policy + 19,202,912
- Cash Flow for CIP Grants 6,500,000
- Cover Special Revenue Fund Negative Fund Balance 177,584 - Business Incentive Loan Program 230,000
- Land Purchases 12,000,000
- Financial System Implementation (FY 2025-26) 1,000,000 - Civic Center Reserve 26,589,971
All Funds Adopted Budget
Revenues 103,653,646
Expenditures 81,496,888
All Funds Net Revenue - 22,156,758
Total Designated/ Assigned 52,839,859
Unassigned 10,489,428
Grand Total Cash - May 31, 2025 $ 270,370,015
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
Treasurer's Report
CITY OF EASTVALE
*Restricted, committed, and assigned figures based on estimated fund balances at the end of the fiscal year, 06/30/2025. However cash estimates in this report are based on the current month. As a result, it is typical that a variance exists between projected unassigned cash balance and current unassigned cash balances. The variance will not be resolved until the end of the fiscal year. A negative unassigned cash balance in the current period does not indicate a cash flow issue for the city.
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 6 24 Investment Income Detail
Yield at Cost - May 31, 2025 4.115%
Annual Investment Income Budget A $ 6,359,578
Investment Income Received YTD:
Money Market (CBB) $ 2,023
Sweep (CBB) 18,510
Money Market (PFM) 4,352
LAIF 2,032,327
CAMP Pool 4,950,721
Certificate of Deposits 47,196
Municipal Bond/Note 5,976
U.S. Treasury Bill 304,850
U.S. Treasury Bond/ Note 302
Federal Agency Bond/ Note 4,014
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage Backed Security 99,576 Asset-Backed Security 316,490
Corporate Note 245,621
Bank Note 35,262
Supra-National Agency Bond/Note 250
Realized Gain/ (Loss) (158,515)
Total Investment Income Received - YTD 05/31/2025 B 7,908,956 Less Investment Fees Paid:
Trust Fees-U.S. Bank (3,891)
Management Fee-PFM (34,069)
Total Investment Fees Paid - YTD 05/31/2025 C (37,961)
Net Investment Income Received - YTD 05/31/2025 B+C $ 7,870,995 Investment Income Over/(Under) Annual Budget C-B $ 1,511,417 123.766%
Net Yield Annualized at Cost - May 31, 2025 4.266%
Fiscal Year 2024-25 as of May 31, 2025
Treasurer's Report
CITY OF EASTVALE
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 7 25 CITY OF EASTVALE
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
May 31, 2025
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts
CITY OF EASTVALE
AMANDA WELLS
12363 LIMONITE AVE
SUITE 910
EASTVALE, CA 91732
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
20240100 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Online Access https://www.pfmam.com Customer Service 1-717-232-2723 Richard Babbe, CCM
Senior Managing Consultant
633 W 5th St., 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
949-230-6896
[email protected]
26 For the Month Ending May 31, 2025
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.
Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable security has or is still able to be called.
Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by 365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.
YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.
Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.
Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.
Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.
PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service Operations at the address below.
Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.
However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting Service Operations at the address below.
Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.
Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile due to a timing difference.
Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.
Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered investment company or local government investment program is contained in the appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.
Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis.
Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or other taxing authorities.
Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.
Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.
Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s beginning values.
Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.
Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at 1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.
Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned, plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on the actual distribution date.
Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by
27 For the Month Ending May 31, 2025
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF EASTVALE
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
Asset-Backed Security 2,610,528.99 1.49
Corporate Note 7,231,787.71 4.13
Bank Note 937,570.20 0.54
Certificate of Deposit 364,385.16 0.21
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security 8,147,436.82 4.66 Municipal Bond / Note 284,201.72 0.16
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 20,918,299.37 11.95
CAMP Pool 134,509,005.35 76.86
Total $175,003,215.32 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Portfolio Holdings Market Value
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 87,062.66 40,494,209.97
CAMP Pool 0.00 134,509,005.35
Total $87,062.66 $175,003,215.32
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
134,509,005.35
284,201.72
0.00 131,838.58
4,702,707.27
5,721,378.57
9,198,364.63
9,087,675.88
11,368,043.32
0.00 76.85
0.16 0.00
0.08 2.69
3.27 5.26
5.19 6.50
0.00 Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $175,003,215.32
246
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation
1.49%
ABS
4.13%
Corporate Note
0.54%
Bank Note
0.21%
Cert of Deposit
4.66%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.16%
Muni Bond / Note
11.95%
US TSY Bond / Note
76.86%
CAMP Pool
PFM Asset Management Summary Page 1
28 Managed Account Summary Statement For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$40,670,270.20
(409,643.69)
(29,293.36)
467,506.43
0.00 (204,629.61)
$40,494,209.97
117,004.24
(60.16)
(29,881.42)
$87,062.66
Total
40,462,536.78
236,835.99
29,335.00
409,643.69
116,962.60
(467,566.59)
(40,419,609.58)
(235,703.99)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $132,433.90
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Reconciling Transactions Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account
385,000.00
29,335.00
116,962.60
24,643.69
(467,566.59)
(357.54)
0.00 Cash Balance
Closing Cash Balance $116,124.61
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 1 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
29 Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Account Summary
Description Par Value Market Value Percent
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 21,305,000.00 20,918,299.37 51.65 Municipal Bond / Note 285,000.00 284,201.72 0.70
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
8,067,439.08 8,147,436.82 20.12
Corporate Note 7,236,000.00 7,231,787.71 17.86
Certificate of Deposit 360,000.00 364,385.16 0.90
Bank Note 925,000.00 937,570.20 2.32
Asset-Backed Security 2,593,841.78 2,610,528.99 6.45
Managed Account Sub-Total 40,772,280.86 40,494,209.97 100.00% Accrued Interest 236,835.99
Total Portfolio 40,772,280.86 40,731,045.96
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation
6.45%
ABS
2.32%
Bank Note
0.90%
Cert of Deposit
17.86%
Corporate Note
20.12%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security
0.70%
Muni Bond / Note
51.65%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years
1.03%
11.61%
14.13%
22.72% 22.44%
28.07%
0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1058
3.96%
4.20%
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 2 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
30 Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)
5.62%
A
11.45%
A+
0.71%
A0.70%
AA
73.17%
AA+
0.78%
AA7.15%
AAA
0.42%
NR
Issuer Summary
Issuer of Holdings Percent
Market Value
Adobe Inc 387,228.80 0.96
American Express Co 313,244.46 0.77
Apple Inc 560,207.20 1.38
BA Credit Card Trust 136,237.68 0.34
Bank of America Corp 591,486.42 1.46
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 602,828.50 1.49
BlackRock Inc 316,737.41 0.78
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 131,838.58 0.33
Citigroup Inc 811,305.29 2.00
Cooperatieve Rabobank UA 364,385.16 0.90
Deere & Co 280,574.25 0.69
Eli Lilly & Co 294,290.23 0.73
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 7,791,152.38 19.23
Federal National Mortgage Association 356,284.44 0.88
Fifth Third Auto Trust 261,846.93 0.65
GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv 100,214.79 0.25 Goldman Sachs Group Inc 402,723.60 0.99
Home Depot Inc 378,415.44 0.93
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 512,099.34 1.26
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 351,095.44 0.87
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1,241,288.00 3.07
Mastercard Inc 285,881.40 0.71
Microsoft Corp 455,790.67 1.13
Morgan Stanley 376,537.90 0.93
PACCAR Inc 277,397.45 0.69
PepsiCo Inc 277,564.20 0.69
State Board of Administration Finance C 284,201.72 0.70 Target Corp 275,292.05 0.68
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust 301,296.98 0.74
Toyota Motor Corp 295,431.59 0.73
United States Treasury 20,918,299.37 51.65
Wells Fargo & Co 561,032.30 1.39
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 3 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
31 Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Total $40,494,209.97 100.00%
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 4 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
32 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 200,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/05/21 05/07/21 196,757.81 0.73 314.92 199,593.53 195,574.20
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 220,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/03/22 05/04/22 200,062.50 2.95 275.76 216,443.90 214,412.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 410,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/26/21 02/26/21 401,511.72 0.80 513.92 408,849.37 399,586.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 665,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/17/22 02/18/22 627,931.45 1.84 833.55 658,732.00 648,110.33
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 720,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/06/22 01/10/22 691,481.25 1.38 902.49 715,304.61 701,713.44
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 770,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/02/21 07/07/21 755,201.56 0.80 965.16 767,836.54 750,443.54
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/01/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 705,000.00 AA+ Aa1 12/03/21 12/07/21 685,998.05 1.15 890.83 701,652.51 685,749.97
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 105,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/02/21 06/04/21 104,770.31 0.79 2.15 104,954.11 101,525.97
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 1,040,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/06/22 06/08/22 953,143.75 2.99 21.31 1,018,241.10 1,005,590.56
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 565,000.00 AA+ Aa1 04/05/22 04/07/22 520,219.34 2.77 837.47 551,705.31 541,936.70
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 750,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/05/22 07/07/22 730,605.47 2.85 4,941.30 742,813.43 728,789.25
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
912828ZN3 220,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/03/22 08/05/22 196,625.00 2.92 95.65 210,563.48 206,215.68
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/15/2024 4.375% 07/15/2027
91282CKZ3 265,000.00 AA+ Aa1 03/19/25 03/20/25 267,401.56 3.96 4,387.69 267,202.02 267,422.37
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 1,050,000.00 AA+ Aa1 09/01/22 09/06/22 995,490.23 3.40 6,917.82 1,025,676.07 1,013,454.75 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 5 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
33 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 155,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/01/22 11/03/22 153,988.87 4.27 1,083.09 154,519.83 155,799.18
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
91282CFU0 380,000.00 AA+ Aa1 12/06/22 12/08/22 385,284.38 3.81 1,363.04 382,606.72 381,914.82
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 1,010,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/04/23 01/06/23 860,117.58 3.91 439.13 934,845.77 931,449.27
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2027
91282CFZ9 575,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/01/23 06/05/23 577,380.86 3.77 60.88 576,324.80 574,707.90
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
91282CGC9 520,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/31/23 01/31/23 524,875.00 3.66 8,460.77 522,561.07 519,858.04
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 225,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/16/23 05/18/23 197,868.16 3.56 564.05 209,626.87 207,246.15
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 385,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/31/23 01/31/23 334,258.20 3.66 965.16 357,934.00 354,621.19
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028
91282CGP0 285,000.00 AA+ Aa1 03/03/23 03/07/23 281,838.28 4.25 2,880.98 283,257.58 285,790.31
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 1,110,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/08/23 05/09/23 998,696.48 3.50 2,350.41 1,045,633.20 1,032,126.84
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/01/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 620,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/01/23 05/01/23 617,214.84 3.60 1,886.96 618,377.10 613,364.14
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2024 4.625% 04/30/2029
91282CKP5 355,000.00 AA+ Aa1 05/02/24 05/03/24 355,776.56 4.58 1,427.72 355,624.24 363,722.35
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
91282CKT7 165,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/06/24 06/07/24 166,495.31 4.30 20.29 166,224.88 168,351.65
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
91282CKT7 1,025,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/05/24 06/06/24 1,033,488.29 4.31 126.02 1,031,950.32 1,045,820.83
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
91282CKX8 165,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/08/24 07/09/24 165,090.23 4.24 2,944.48 165,075.91 166,843.38 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 6 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
34 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
91282CKX8 375,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/02/24 07/03/24 372,451.17 4.40 6,691.99 372,877.47 379,189.50
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2024 4.000% 07/31/2029
91282CLC3 40,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/01/24 08/02/24 40,278.12 3.85 534.81 40,235.59 40,075.00
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/03/2024 3.625% 08/31/2029
91282CLK5 1,090,000.00 AA+ Aa1 09/04/24 09/05/24 1,092,256.64 3.58 9,985.50 1,091,950.44 1,075,863.79
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2024 3.500% 09/30/2029
91282CLN9 500,000.00 AA+ Aa1 10/02/24 10/03/24 498,574.22 3.56 2,964.48 498,750.43 490,937.50
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
91282CLR0 270,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/14/24 11/15/24 267,996.09 4.29 968.48 268,197.47 271,687.50
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
91282CLR0 300,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/01/24 11/04/24 299,261.72 4.18 1,076.09 299,340.21 301,875.00
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/02/2024 4.125% 11/30/2029
91282CMA6 295,000.00 AA+ Aa1 12/05/24 12/06/24 295,530.08 4.08 33.25 295,483.93 296,970.60
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
91282CMD0 845,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/06/25 01/07/25 843,118.55 4.43 15,522.79 843,255.50 858,928.98
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.250% 01/31/2030
91282CMG3 725,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/04/25 02/05/25 722,309.57 4.33 10,299.21 722,467.96 733,297.62
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/28/2030
91282CGQ8 1,300,000.00 AA+ Aa1 03/04/25 03/05/25 1,302,742.19 3.95 13,141.30 1,302,626.18 1,301,625.00
US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
91282CMU2 905,000.00 AA+ Aa1 04/01/25 04/02/25 909,525.00 3.89 6,132.24 909,392.42 905,706.81 Security Type Sub-Total 21,305,000.00 20,623,616.39 3.33 113,823.14 21,038,707.87 20,918,299.37 Municipal Bond / Note
FLORIDA ST BRD OF ADM
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 80,000.00 AA Aa2 09/03/20 09/16/20 80,565.60 1.11 419.33 80,009.84 79,775.92
FLORIDA ST BRD OF ADM
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 205,000.00 AA Aa2 09/03/20 09/16/20 205,000.00 1.26 1,074.54 205,000.00 204,425.80 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 7 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
35 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Municipal Bond / Note
Security Type Sub-Total 285,000.00 285,565.60 1.22 1,493.87 285,009.84 284,201.72 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 255,681.98 AA+ Aa1 05/19/23 05/24/23 247,811.77 4.29 713.14 252,349.15 251,928.82 FHMS K064 A2
DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027
3137BXQY1 390,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/16/23 08/18/23 367,879.69 4.94 1,047.80 378,846.04 382,744.83 FHMS K065 A2
DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027
3137F1G44 220,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/16/23 08/18/23 207,427.34 4.93 594.55 213,519.44 215,760.38 FHMS K066 A2
DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027
3137F2LJ3 345,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/17/23 08/22/23 322,628.91 4.97 896.14 332,965.23 337,538.69 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
3137HAMR4 336,336.57 AA+ Aa1 09/20/23 09/28/23 331,058.45 5.19 1,345.35 332,783.39 340,122.38 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
3137HAMG8 186,769.97 AA+ Aa1 09/07/23 09/14/23 183,976.84 5.01 723.73 184,917.26 188,221.73 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 295,571.07 AA+ Aa1 07/19/23 07/27/23 295,563.66 4.78 1,176.62 295,566.44 297,030.31 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 360,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/13/23 07/20/23 363,595.68 4.59 1,445.70 362,236.41 364,590.36 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.182% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 358,197.94 AA+ Aa1 07/18/23 07/31/23 352,125.36 4.58 1,248.18 354,359.42 356,284.44 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
3137HAMN3 194,881.55 AA+ Aa1 09/19/23 09/28/23 194,880.57 5.27 856.18 194,880.97 198,206.43 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 375,000.00 AA+ Aa1 09/07/23 09/14/23 369,452.63 4.99 1,453.13 371,215.62 378,235.50 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 380,000.00 AA+ Aa1 10/11/23 10/19/23 371,664.32 5.25 1,501.00 374,202.02 384,288.68 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 8 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
36 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 285,000.00 AA+ Aa1 10/25/23 10/31/23 275,913.35 5.60 1,151.88 278,475.81 289,391.00 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3137HAMS2 370,000.00 AA+ Aa1 09/20/23 09/28/23 365,577.39 5.07 1,480.00 366,887.99 375,521.14 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 145,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/14/23 11/21/23 144,580.81 5.14 612.50 144,699.33 148,252.35 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 210,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/28/23 12/07/23 209,396.67 4.93 850.50 209,564.32 213,167.22 FHMS K512 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
3137HBCF9 190,000.00 AA+ Aa1 12/11/23 12/21/23 191,774.22 4.79 791.67 191,298.70 193,930.34 FHMS K513 A2
DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028
3137HBFY5 215,000.00 AA+ Aa1 01/10/24 01/18/24 217,147.64 4.50 846.38 216,601.02 217,708.36 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 220,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/01/24 02/08/24 222,199.78 4.34 838.20 221,655.13 221,422.96 FHMS K517 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029
3137HC2C5 335,000.00 AA+ Aa1 03/05/24 03/14/24 345,045.31 4.67 1,494.94 342,757.00 346,292.52 FHMS K515 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029
3137HBPD0 375,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/14/24 02/22/24 385,102.50 4.79 1,687.50 382,720.22 387,709.88 FHMS K516 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029
3137HBPM0 375,000.00 AA+ Aa1 02/29/24 03/07/24 386,248.88 4.79 1,711.56 383,661.46 388,174.88 FHMS K524 A2
DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029
3137HDV56 320,000.00 AA+ Aa1 07/16/24 07/25/24 321,965.12 4.58 1,258.67 321,677.92 323,877.76 FHMS K522 A2
DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
3137HDJJ0 375,000.00 AA+ Aa1 06/05/24 06/13/24 374,998.88 4.80 1,500.94 375,000.00 380,533.50 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 350,000.00 AA+ Aa1 08/07/24 08/15/24 353,273.90 4.33 1,325.04 352,796.01 352,189.25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 205,000.00 AA+ Aa1 10/08/24 10/16/24 209,097.34 4.34 818.46 208,628.25 208,145.11 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 9 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
37 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 400,000.00 AA+ Aa1 11/19/24 11/27/24 402,082.80 4.67 1,597.33 401,914.22 406,168.00 Security Type Sub-Total 8,067,439.08 8,012,469.81 4.82 30,967.09 8,046,178.77 8,147,436.82 Corporate Note
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
110122DN5 134,000.00 A A2 06/17/21 06/21/21 132,665.36 0.98 50.25 133,863.33 131,838.58
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026
594918BR4 465,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/23/22 02/25/22 470,156.85 2.14 3,503.00 466,373.66 455,790.67
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP
DTD 08/10/2023 5.050% 08/10/2026
69371RS56 275,000.00 A+ A1 08/09/23 08/11/23 276,130.25 4.90 4,281.98 275,449.38 277,397.45
BANK OF AMERICA NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/18/2023 5.526% 08/18/2026
06428CAA2 300,000.00 A+ Aa2 10/23/23 10/24/23 297,474.00 5.85 4,743.15 298,911.38 303,775.50
TARGET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 50,000.00 A A2 01/19/22 01/24/22 49,915.00 1.99 368.33 49,972.28 48,296.85
TARGET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 235,000.00 A A2 01/27/22 01/31/22 234,856.65 1.96 1,731.17 234,953.07 226,995.20
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 380,000.00 A Aa3 01/26/22 01/28/22 381,223.60 1.98 2,704.86 380,390.08 366,377.38
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027
00724PAC3 400,000.00 A+ A1 12/13/22 12/15/22 369,240.00 4.20 2,866.67 387,580.08 387,228.80
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/21/2024 5.414% 05/21/2027
38151LAG5 400,000.00 A+ A1 05/21/25 05/22/25 402,516.00 5.08 601.56 402,453.90 402,723.60
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
437076BT8 390,000.00 A A2 01/25/23 01/27/23 368,000.10 4.15 2,335.67 379,138.62 378,415.44
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2017 3.442% 02/07/2028
06406RAB3 240,000.00 A Aa3 08/06/24 08/07/24 233,169.60 4.33 2,615.92 234,675.50 236,451.12
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
46647PEE2 140,000.00 A A1 06/03/24 06/04/24 140,933.80 5.38 844.94 140,628.41 142,548.98 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 10 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
38 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note
APPLE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028
037833ET3 560,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/16/23 05/18/23 561,024.80 3.96 1,306.67 560,598.48 560,207.20
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
24422EXB0 125,000.00 A A1 07/11/23 07/14/23 124,813.75 4.98 2,354.69 124,883.80 127,533.75
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
24422EXB0 150,000.00 A A1 07/13/23 07/17/23 152,037.00 4.64 2,825.63 151,272.98 153,040.50
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
17325FBB3 365,000.00 A+ Aa3 09/26/23 09/29/23 365,000.00 5.80 3,647.83 365,000.00 379,649.27
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
17325FBB3 415,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/01/24 05/03/24 423,026.10 5.30 4,147.53 421,191.36 431,656.02
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.979% 01/24/2029
06051GMK2 285,000.00 A- A1 04/01/25 04/02/25 288,157.80 4.66 5,005.97 287,984.74 287,710.92
BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
09290DAA9 35,000.00 AA- Aa3 03/05/24 03/14/24 34,936.65 4.74 351.85 34,950.81 35,531.44
BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
09290DAA9 277,000.00 AA- Aa3 04/09/24 04/11/24 275,714.72 4.81 2,784.62 275,986.41 281,205.97
MASTERCARD INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/31/2019 2.950% 06/01/2029
57636QAM6 300,000.00 A+ Aa3 06/26/24 06/27/24 275,595.00 4.82 4,425.00 279,760.61 285,881.40
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/17/2024 4.500% 07/17/2029
713448FX1 185,000.00 A+ A1 07/15/24 07/17/24 184,713.25 4.53 3,098.75 184,759.48 186,715.32
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
89236TMK8 50,000.00 A+ A1 08/06/24 08/09/24 49,898.50 4.60 707.78 49,913.48 50,073.15
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
89236TMK8 115,000.00 A+ A1 08/07/24 08/09/24 114,867.75 4.58 1,627.89 114,887.66 115,168.25
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
89236TMK8 130,000.00 A+ A1 08/08/24 08/09/24 129,465.70 4.64 1,840.22 129,544.67 130,190.19
ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
532457CQ9 65,000.00 A+ Aa3 08/12/24 08/14/24 64,857.65 4.25 811.42 64,878.62 64,843.61 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 11 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
39 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note
ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
532457CQ9 230,000.00 A+ Aa3 08/13/24 08/14/24 230,335.80 4.17 2,871.17 230,287.15 229,446.62
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
713448GB8 90,000.00 A+ A1 02/05/25 02/07/25 89,848.80 4.64 1,311.00 89,857.54 90,848.88
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.581% 04/22/2030
46647PEG7 450,000.00 A A1 04/25/25 04/28/25 463,999.50 4.87 2,720.74 463,704.30 464,245.65 Security Type Sub-Total 7,236,000.00 7,184,573.98 4.28 68,486.26 7,213,851.78 7,231,787.71 Certificate of Deposit
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 07/20/2023 5.080% 07/17/2026
21684LGS5 360,000.00 A+ Aa2 07/17/23 07/20/23 360,000.00 5.08 6,807.20 360,000.00 364,385.16 Security Type Sub-Total 360,000.00 360,000.00 5.08 6,807.20 360,000.00 364,385.16 Bank Note
WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
94988J6D4 555,000.00 A+ Aa2 08/18/23 08/22/23 554,239.65 5.50 9,578.38 554,695.86 561,032.30
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/30/2024 5.504% 05/26/2028
61690U8B9 370,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/30/24 05/31/24 370,780.70 5.45 282.84 370,495.86 376,537.90 Security Type Sub-Total 925,000.00 925,020.35 5.48 9,861.22 925,191.72 937,570.20 Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
43815QAC1 223,815.55 AAA NR 08/15/23 08/22/23 223,769.39 5.42 437.25 223,787.64 225,183.28 TAOT 2023-C A3
DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
89231FAD2 75,000.00 AAA NR 08/08/23 08/15/23 74,983.04 5.17 172.00 74,989.55 75,382.95 TAOT 2023-D A3
DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
89239FAD4 75,000.00 AAA NR 11/07/23 11/14/23 74,991.92 5.54 184.67 74,994.50 75,821.18 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
31680EAD3 260,026.23 AAA Aaa 08/15/23 08/23/23 260,010.11 5.53 639.09 260,015.85 261,846.93 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 12 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
40 Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Asset-Backed Security
CHAIT 2023-A1 A
DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028
161571HT4 300,000.00 AAA NR 09/07/23 09/15/23 299,916.84 5.17 688.00 299,942.95 302,909.70 AMXCA 2023-3 A
DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028
02582JKD1 310,000.00 AAA NR 09/12/23 09/19/23 309,986.14 5.23 720.58 309,990.65 313,244.46 HART 2023-C A3
DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
44918CAD4 105,000.00 AAA NR 11/03/23 11/13/23 104,986.19 5.54 258.53 104,990.32 106,202.99 BACCT 2023-A2 A2
DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028
05522RDH8 135,000.00 NR Aaa 12/07/23 12/14/23 134,981.87 4.98 298.80 134,987.17 136,237.68 GMCAR 2024-1 A3
DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
36268GAD7 35,000.00 NR Aaa 01/09/24 01/17/24 34,992.96 4.85 70.73 34,994.76 35,161.42 CHAIT 2024-A1 A
DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/16/2029
161571HV9 330,000.00 AAA NR 01/24/24 01/31/24 329,949.74 4.60 674.67 329,962.61 331,583.67 HAROT 2025-1 A3
DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029
43814VAC1 285,000.00 AAA NR 02/04/25 02/11/25 284,991.22 4.57 361.79 284,992.22 286,916.06 HART 2025-A A3
DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029
44935CAD3 245,000.00 AAA NR 03/04/25 03/12/25 244,963.86 4.32 470.40 244,965.89 244,892.45 TAOT 2025-B A3
DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029
89231HAD8 150,000.00 AAA NR 04/24/25 04/30/25 149,991.41 4.34 289.33 149,992.11 150,092.85 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 65,000.00 AAA Aaa 05/06/25 05/14/25 64,990.43 4.28 131.37 64,990.58 65,053.37 Security Type Sub-Total 2,593,841.78 2,593,505.12 4.96 5,397.21 2,593,596.80 2,610,528.99 Managed Account Sub-Total 40,772,280.86 39,984,751.25 3.96 236,835.99 40,462,536.78 40,494,209.97 $40,772,280.86 $39,984,751.25 3.96% $236,835.99 $40,462,536.78 $40,494,209.97 $40,731,045.96
$236,835.99
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 13 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
41 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBC4 200,000.00 HSBC 97.79 195,574.20 (1,183.61) (4,019.33) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
0.57 4.12
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBH3 220,000.00 JPMorgan 97.46 214,412.44 14,349.94 (2,031.46) DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.66 4.30
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBH3 410,000.00 BOFAML 97.46 399,586.82 (1,924.90) (9,262.55) DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.66 4.30
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBH3 665,000.00 Nomura 97.46 648,110.33 20,178.88 (10,621.67) DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.66 4.30
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBH3 720,000.00 Citigrou 97.46 701,713.44 10,232.19 (13,591.17) DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.66 4.30
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBH3 770,000.00 BNPPSA 97.46 750,443.54 (4,758.02) (17,393.00) DTD 02/01/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
0.66 4.30
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBQ3 705,000.00 WellsFar 97.27 685,749.97 (248.08) (15,902.54) DTD 03/01/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
0.73 4.12
US TREASURY N/B 91282CCF6 105,000.00 RBC Capi 96.69 101,525.97 (3,244.34) (3,428.14) DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
0.98 4.16
US TREASURY N/B 91282CCF6 1,040,000.00 Citigrou 96.69 1,005,590.56 52,446.81 (12,650.54) DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
0.98 4.16
US TREASURY N/B 91282CCZ2 565,000.00 RBC Capi 95.92 541,936.70 21,717.36 (9,768.61) DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
1.30 4.10
US TREASURY N/B 912828V98 750,000.00 JPMorgan 97.17 728,789.25 (1,816.22) (14,024.18) DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
1.64 4.01
US TREASURY N/B 912828ZN3 220,000.00 Nomura 93.73 206,215.68 9,590.68 (4,347.80) DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
1.87 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKZ3 265,000.00 BNP Sec 100.91 267,422.37 20.81 220.35 DTD 07/15/2024 4.375% 07/15/2027
1.98 3.94
US TREASURY N/B 9128282R0 1,050,000.00 HSBC 96.52 1,013,454.75 17,964.52 (12,221.32) DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
2.11 3.93
US TREASURY N/B 91282CFM8 155,000.00 BOFAML 100.52 155,799.18 1,810.31 1,279.35 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
2.19 3.91
US TREASURY N/B 91282CFU0 380,000.00 Nomura 100.50 381,914.82 (3,369.56) (691.90) DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
2.27 3.93
US TREASURY N/B 91282CAU5 1,010,000.00 WellsFar 92.22 931,449.27 71,331.69 (3,396.50) DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
2.36 3.94
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 14 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
42 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B 91282CFZ9 575,000.00 Citigrou 99.95 574,707.90 (2,672.96) (1,616.90) DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2027
2.32 3.92
US TREASURY N/B 91282CGC9 520,000.00 WellsFar 99.97 519,858.04 (5,016.96) (2,703.03) DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
2.40 3.91
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBJ9 225,000.00 GoldmanS 92.11 207,246.15 9,377.99 (2,380.72) DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
2.59 3.93
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBJ9 385,000.00 Nomura 92.11 354,621.19 20,362.99 (3,312.81) DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
2.59 3.93
US TREASURY N/B 91282CGP0 285,000.00 TD Secur 100.28 285,790.31 3,952.03 2,532.73 DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028
2.56 3.91
US TREASURY N/B 91282CBS9 1,110,000.00 BNPPSA 92.98 1,032,126.84 33,430.36 (13,506.36) DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
2.73 3.92
US TREASURY N/B 91282CHA2 620,000.00 BOFAML 98.93 613,364.14 (3,850.70) (5,012.96) DTD 05/01/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
2.73 3.92
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKP5 355,000.00 WellsFar 102.46 363,722.35 7,945.79 8,098.11 DTD 04/30/2024 4.625% 04/30/2029
3.55 3.96
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKT7 165,000.00 JPMorgan 102.03 168,351.65 1,856.34 2,126.77 DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
3.56 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKT7 1,025,000.00 JPMorgan 102.03 1,045,820.83 12,332.54 13,870.51 DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
3.56 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKX8 165,000.00 Citigrou 101.12 166,843.38 1,753.15 1,767.47 DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CKX8 375,000.00 HSBC 101.12 379,189.50 6,738.33 6,312.03 DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
3.66 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CLC3 40,000.00 Citigrou 100.19 40,075.00 (203.12) (160.59) DTD 07/31/2024 4.000% 07/31/2029
3.76 3.97
US TREASURY N/B 91282CLK5 1,090,000.00 Citigrou 98.70 1,075,863.79 (16,392.85) (16,086.65) DTD 09/03/2024 3.625% 08/31/2029
3.87 3.98
US TREASURY N/B 91282CLN9 500,000.00 TD Secur 98.19 490,937.50 (7,636.72) (7,812.93) DTD 09/30/2024 3.500% 09/30/2029
3.96 3.98
US TREASURY N/B 91282CLR0 270,000.00 TD Secur 100.63 271,687.50 3,691.41 3,490.03 DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
4.00 3.98
US TREASURY N/B 91282CLR0 300,000.00 HSBC 100.63 301,875.00 2,613.28 2,534.79 DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
4.00 3.98
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 15 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
43 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B 91282CMA6 295,000.00 WellsFar 100.67 296,970.60 1,440.52 1,486.67 DTD 12/02/2024 4.125% 11/30/2029
4.00 3.98
US TREASURY N/B 91282CMD0 845,000.00 BNP Sec 101.65 858,928.98 15,810.43 15,673.48 DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
4.06 4.00
US TREASURY N/B 91282CMG3 725,000.00 BNP Sec 101.14 733,297.62 10,988.05 10,829.66 DTD 01/31/2025 4.250% 01/31/2030
4.15 4.00
US TREASURY N/B 91282CGQ8 1,300,000.00 Nomura 100.13 1,301,625.00 (1,117.19) (1,001.18) DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/28/2030
4.25 3.99
US TREASURY N/B 91282CMU2 905,000.00 BNP Sec 100.08 905,706.81 (3,818.19) (3,685.61) DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
4.33 4.00
Security Type Sub-Total 21,305,000.00 20,918,299.37 294,682.98 (120,408.50) 2.60 4.03 Municipal Bond / Note
FLORIDA ST BRD OF ADM 341271AD6 80,000.00 BOFAML 99.72 79,775.92 (789.68) (233.92) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
0.09 4.76
FLORIDA ST BRD OF ADM 341271AD6 205,000.00 BOFAML 99.72 204,425.80 (574.20) (574.20) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
0.09 4.76
Security Type Sub-Total 285,000.00 284,201.72 (1,363.88) (808.12) 0.09 4.76 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K061 A2 3137BTUM1 255,681.98 Citigrou 98.53 251,928.82 4,117.05 (420.33) DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
1.33 4.33
FHMS K064 A2 3137BXQY1 390,000.00 MorganSt 98.14 382,744.83 14,865.14 3,898.79 DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027
1.58 4.32
FHMS K065 A2 3137F1G44 220,000.00 MorganSt 98.07 215,760.38 8,333.04 2,240.94 DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027
1.73 4.28
FHMS K066 A2 3137F2LJ3 345,000.00 CantorFi 97.84 337,538.69 14,909.78 4,573.46 DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027
1.81 4.27
FHMS K507 A1 3137HAMR4 336,336.57 BOFAML 101.13 340,122.38 9,063.93 7,338.99 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
2.31 4.26
FHMS K506 A1 3137HAMG8 186,769.97 WellsFar 100.78 188,221.73 4,244.89 3,304.47 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
2.46 4.28
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 16 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
44 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS KJ46 A1 3137HAD45 295,571.07 JPMorgan 100.49 297,030.31 1,466.65 1,463.87 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
1.92 4.43
FHMS K505 A2 3137HACX2 360,000.00 JPMorgan 101.28 364,590.36 994.68 2,353.95 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
2.71 4.30
FNA 2023-M6 A2 3136BQDE6 358,197.94 JPMorgan 99.47 356,284.44 4,159.08 1,925.02 DTD 07/01/2023 4.182% 07/01/2028
2.84 4.32
FHMS KJ47 A1 3137HAMN3 194,881.55 JPMorgan 101.71 198,206.43 3,325.86 3,325.46 DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
2.20 4.43
FHMS K506 A2 3137HAMH6 375,000.00 WellsFar 100.86 378,235.50 8,782.87 7,019.88 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
2.85 4.31
FHMS K508 A2 3137HAQ74 380,000.00 BMO 101.13 384,288.68 12,624.36 10,086.66 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
2.87 4.31
FHMS K509 A2 3137HAST4 285,000.00 MorganSt 101.54 289,391.00 13,477.65 10,915.19 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
2.95 4.29
FHMS K507 A2 3137HAMS2 370,000.00 BOFAML 101.49 375,521.14 9,943.75 8,633.15 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
2.91 4.26
FHMS K510 A2 3137HB3D4 145,000.00 JPMorgan 102.24 148,252.35 3,671.54 3,553.02 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
2.98 4.33
FHMS K511 A2 3137HB3G7 210,000.00 BOFAML 101.51 213,167.22 3,770.55 3,602.90 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3.02 4.33
FHMS K512 A2 3137HBCF9 190,000.00 JPMorgan 102.07 193,930.34 2,156.12 2,631.64 DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
3.03 4.32
FHMS K513 A2 3137HBFY5 215,000.00 BMO 101.26 217,708.36 560.72 1,107.34 DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028
3.15 4.33
FHMS K514 A2 3137HBLV4 220,000.00 JPMorgan 100.65 221,422.96 (776.82) (232.17) DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3.11 4.33
FHMS K517 A2 3137HC2C5 335,000.00 BOFAML 103.37 346,292.52 1,247.21 3,535.52 DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029
3.24 4.30
FHMS K515 A2 3137HBPD0 375,000.00 WellsFar 103.39 387,709.88 2,607.38 4,989.66 DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029
3.15 4.31
FHMS K516 A2 3137HBPM0 375,000.00 MorganSt 103.51 388,174.88 1,926.00 4,513.42 DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029
3.18 4.36
FHMS K524 A2 3137HDV56 320,000.00 PIER 101.21 323,877.76 1,912.64 2,199.84 DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029
3.53 4.36
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 17 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
45 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K522 A2 3137HDJJ0 375,000.00 MorganSt 101.48 380,533.50 5,534.62 5,533.50 DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
3.42 4.35
FHMS K526 A2 3137HDXL9 350,000.00 BMO 100.63 352,189.25 (1,084.65) (606.76) DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3.68 4.35
FHMS K529 A2 3137HH6C0 205,000.00 MorganSt 101.53 208,145.11 (952.23) (483.14) DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3.78 4.37
FHMS K530 A2 3137HHJL6 400,000.00 JPMorgan 101.54 406,168.00 4,085.20 4,253.78 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3.80 4.37
Security Type Sub-Total 8,067,439.08 8,147,436.82 134,967.01 101,258.05 2.82 4.32 Corporate Note
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO (CALLABLE) 110122DN5 134,000.00 Citigrou 10/13/25 98.39 131,838.58 (826.78) (2,024.75) DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
0.45 4.54
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) 594918BR4 465,000.00 Citigrou 05/08/26 98.02 455,790.67 (14,366.18) (10,582.99) DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026
1.13 4.13
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 69371RS56 275,000.00 TD Secur 100.87 277,397.45 1,267.20 1,948.07 DTD 08/10/2023 5.050% 08/10/2026
1.14 4.31
BANK OF AMERICA NA (CALLABLE) 06428CAA2 300,000.00 Citigrou 07/17/26 101.26 303,775.50 6,301.50 4,864.12 DTD 08/18/2023 5.526% 08/18/2026
1.09 4.43
TARGET CORP (CALLABLE) 87612EBM7 50,000.00 Citigrou 12/15/26 96.59 48,296.85 (1,618.15) (1,675.43) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
1.56 4.17
TARGET CORP (CALLABLE) 87612EBM7 235,000.00 Barclays 12/15/26 96.59 226,995.20 (7,861.45) (7,957.87) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
1.56 4.17
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) 06406RBA4 380,000.00 JPMorgan 12/24/26 96.42 366,377.38 (14,846.22) (14,012.70) DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
1.58 4.34
ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) 00724PAC3 400,000.00 CSFirstB 12/01/26 96.81 387,228.80 17,988.80 (351.28) DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027
1.59 4.16
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (CALLABLE) 38151LAG5 400,000.00 WellsFar 05/21/26 100.68 402,723.60 207.60 269.70 DTD 05/21/2024 5.414% 05/21/2027
0.95 4.92
HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) 437076BT8 390,000.00 Citigrou 06/14/27 97.03 378,415.44 10,415.34 (723.18) DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
2.12 4.18
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) 06406RAB3 240,000.00 Citigrou 02/07/27 98.52 236,451.12 3,281.52 1,775.62 DTD 02/07/2017 3.442% 02/07/2028
1.60 4.85
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 18 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
46 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEE2 140,000.00 JANE 04/22/27 101.82 142,548.98 1,615.18 1,920.57 DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
1.79 4.79
APPLE INC (CALLABLE) 037833ET3 560,000.00 JPMorgan 04/10/28 100.04 560,207.20 (817.60) (391.28) DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028
2.71 4.00
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EXB0 125,000.00 Citigrou 102.03 127,533.75 2,720.00 2,649.95 DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
2.82 4.25
JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 24422EXB0 150,000.00 SGSA 102.03 153,040.50 1,003.50 1,767.52 DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
2.82 4.25
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 365,000.00 Citigrou 08/29/28 104.01 379,649.27 14,649.27 14,649.27 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
2.94 4.51
CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) 17325FBB3 415,000.00 Citigrou 08/29/28 104.01 431,656.02 8,629.92 10,464.66 DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
2.94 4.51
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) 06051GMK2 285,000.00 Citigrou 01/24/28 100.95 287,710.92 (446.88) (273.82) DTD 01/24/2025 4.979% 01/24/2029
2.43 4.75
BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE) 09290DAA9 35,000.00 Citigrou 02/14/29 101.52 35,531.44 594.79 580.63 DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
3.38 4.25
BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE) 09290DAA9 277,000.00 GoldmanS 02/14/29 101.52 281,205.97 5,491.25 5,219.56 DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
3.38 4.25
MASTERCARD INC (CALLABLE) 57636QAM6 300,000.00 Citigrou 03/01/29 95.29 285,881.40 10,286.40 6,120.79 DTD 05/31/2019 2.950% 06/01/2029
3.61 4.25
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) 713448FX1 185,000.00 Citigrou 06/17/29 100.93 186,715.32 2,002.07 1,955.84 DTD 07/17/2024 4.500% 07/17/2029
3.65 4.28
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TMK8 50,000.00 MIZU 100.15 50,073.15 174.65 159.67 DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
3.73 4.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TMK8 115,000.00 MorganSt 100.15 115,168.25 300.50 280.59 DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
3.73 4.54
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 89236TMK8 130,000.00 LoopCapM 100.15 130,190.19 724.49 645.52 DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
3.73 4.54
ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE) 532457CQ9 65,000.00 MorganSt 07/14/29 99.76 64,843.61 (14.04) (35.01) DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
3.75 4.28
ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE) 532457CQ9 230,000.00 JPMorgan 07/14/29 99.76 229,446.62 (889.18) (840.53) DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
3.75 4.28
PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) 713448GB8 90,000.00 MorganSt 01/07/30 100.94 90,848.88 1,000.08 991.34 DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
4.10 4.38
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 19 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
47 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) 46647PEG7 450,000.00 BOFAML 04/22/29 103.17 464,245.65 246.15 541.35 DTD 04/22/2024 5.581% 04/22/2030
3.47 4.85
Security Type Sub-Total 7,236,000.00 7,231,787.71 47,213.73 17,935.93 2.35 4.40 Certificate of Deposit
COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY 21684LGS5 360,000.00 RABO UA 101.22 364,385.16 4,385.16 4,385.16 DTD 07/20/2023 5.080% 07/17/2026
1.07 3.96
Security Type Sub-Total 360,000.00 364,385.16 4,385.16 4,385.16 1.07 3.96 Bank Note
WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) 94988J6D4 555,000.00 JPMorgan 07/07/26 101.09 561,032.30 6,792.65 6,336.44 DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
1.06 4.49
MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA (CALLABLE) 61690U8B9 370,000.00 MorganSt 05/26/27 101.77 376,537.90 5,757.20 6,042.04 DTD 05/30/2024 5.504% 05/26/2028
1.88 4.78
Security Type Sub-Total 925,000.00 937,570.20 12,549.85 12,378.48 1.39 4.61 Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2023-3 A3 43815QAC1 223,815.55 BOFAML 100.61 225,183.28 1,413.89 1,395.64 DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
0.73 4.63
TAOT 2023-C A3 89231FAD2 75,000.00 BNPPSA 100.51 75,382.95 399.91 393.40 DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
0.79 4.57
TAOT 2023-D A3 89239FAD4 75,000.00 JPMorgan 101.09 75,821.18 829.26 826.68 DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
1.03 4.56
FITAT 2023-1 A3 31680EAD3 260,026.23 JPMorgan 100.70 261,846.93 1,836.82 1,831.08 DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
0.81 4.73
CHAIT 2023-A1 A 161571HT4 300,000.00 JPMorgan 100.97 302,909.70 2,992.86 2,966.75 DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028
1.23 4.44
AMXCA 2023-3 A 02582JKD1 310,000.00 Citigrou 101.05 313,244.46 3,258.32 3,253.81 DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028
1.23 4.45
HART 2023-C A3 44918CAD4 105,000.00 BNPPSA 101.15 106,202.99 1,216.80 1,212.67 DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
0.98 4.45
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 20 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
48 Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Asset-Backed Security
BACCT 2023-A2 A2 05522RDH8 135,000.00 BOFAML 100.92 136,237.68 1,255.81 1,250.51 DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028
1.38 4.39
GMCAR 2024-1 A3 36268GAD7 35,000.00 Barclays 100.46 35,161.42 168.46 166.66 DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
1.00 4.46
CHAIT 2024-A1 A 161571HV9 330,000.00 JPMorgan 100.48 331,583.67 1,633.93 1,621.06 DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/16/2029
1.54 4.35
HAROT 2025-1 A3 43814VAC1 285,000.00 MUFG 100.67 286,916.06 1,924.84 1,923.84 DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029
1.97 4.29
HART 2025-A A3 44935CAD3 245,000.00 Barclays 99.96 244,892.45 (71.41) (73.44) DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029
1.97 4.40
TAOT 2025-B A3 89231HAD8 150,000.00 Barclays 100.06 150,092.85 101.44 100.74 DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029
2.21 4.37
GMCAR 2025-2 A3 362549AD9 65,000.00 TD Secur 100.08 65,053.37 62.94 62.79 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
2.16 4.39
Security Type Sub-Total 2,593,841.78 2,610,528.99 17,023.87 16,932.19 1.39 4.46 Managed Account Sub-Total 40,772,280.86 40,494,209.97 509,458.72 31,673.19 2.46 4.20 Total Investments $40,731,045.96
$236,835.99
$40,494,209.97
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $40,772,280.86 $509,458.72 $31,673.19 2.46 4.20% PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 21 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
49 Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
05/14/25 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
05/06/25 362549AD9 65,000.00 (64,990.43) 0.00 (64,990.43) 05/22/25 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
(CALLABLE)
DTD 05/21/2024 5.414% 05/21/2027
05/21/25 38151LAG5 400,000.00 (402,516.00) (60.16) (402,576.16) Transaction Type Sub-Total 465,000.00 (467,506.43) (60.16) (467,566.59)
INTEREST
05/01/25 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
05/01/25 MONEY0002 0.00 73.38 73.38
05/25/25 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMR4 0.00 1,352.92 1,352.92
05/25/25 FHMS K516 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HBPM0 0.00 1,711.56 1,711.56
05/25/25 FHMS K522 A2
DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HDJJ0 0.00 1,500.94 1,500.94
05/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.182% 07/01/2028
05/01/25 3136BQDE6 0.00 1,248.19 1,248.19
05/25/25 FHMS K065 A2
DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027
05/01/25 3137F1G44 0.00 594.55 594.55
05/25/25 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HB3G7 0.00 850.50 850.50
05/25/25 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMG8 0.00 724.42 724.42
05/25/25 FHMS K513 A2
DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HBFY5 0.00 846.38 846.38
05/25/25 FHMS K512 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HBCF9 0.00 791.67 791.67
05/25/25 FHMS K066 A2
DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027
05/01/25 3137F2LJ3 0.00 896.14 896.14
05/25/25 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HB3D4 0.00 612.50 612.50
05/25/25 FHMS K064 A2
DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027
05/01/25 3137BXQY1 0.00 1,047.80 1,047.80
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 22 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
50 Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
05/25/25 FHMS K515 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HBPD0 0.00 1,687.50 1,687.50
05/25/25 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HACX2 0.00 1,445.70 1,445.70
05/25/25 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HH6C0 0.00 818.46 818.46
05/25/25 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMN3 0.00 858.65 858.65
05/25/25 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HHJL6 0.00 1,597.33 1,597.33
05/25/25 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HDXL9 0.00 1,325.04 1,325.04
05/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAD45 0.00 1,177.81 1,177.81
05/25/25 FHMS K524 A2
DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HDV56 0.00 1,258.67 1,258.67
05/25/25 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMS2 0.00 1,480.00 1,480.00
05/25/25 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
05/01/25 3137BTUM1 0.00 714.67 714.67
05/25/25 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HBLV4 0.00 838.20 838.20
05/25/25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAST4 0.00 1,151.88 1,151.88
05/25/25 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMH6 0.00 1,453.13 1,453.13
05/25/25 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAQ74 0.00 1,501.00 1,501.00
05/25/25 FHMS K517 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029
05/01/25 3137HC2C5 0.00 1,494.94 1,494.94
05/10/25 APPLE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028
05/10/25 037833ET3 0.00 11,200.00 11,200.00
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 23 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
51 Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
05/13/25 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
(CALLABLE)
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
05/13/25 110122DN5 0.00 502.50 502.50
05/15/25 HART 2023-C A3
DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
05/15/25 44918CAD4 0.00 484.75 484.75
05/15/25 TAOT 2023-D A3
DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
05/15/25 89239FAD4 0.00 346.25 346.25
05/15/25 CHAIT 2024-A1 A
DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/16/2029
05/15/25 161571HV9 0.00 1,265.00 1,265.00
05/15/25 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
05/15/25 31680EAD3 0.00 1,221.21 1,221.21
05/15/25 TAOT 2023-C A3
DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
05/15/25 89231FAD2 0.00 322.50 322.50
05/15/25 UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-BG (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025
05/15/25 91412HGE7 0.00 551.88 551.88
05/15/25 AMXCA 2023-3 A
DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028
05/15/25 02582JKD1 0.00 1,351.08 1,351.08
05/15/25 TAOT 2025-B A3
DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029
05/15/25 89231HAD8 0.00 271.25 271.25
05/15/25 HART 2025-A A3
DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029
05/15/25 44935CAD3 0.00 882.00 882.00
05/15/25 CHAIT 2023-A1 A
DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028
05/15/25 161571HT4 0.00 1,290.00 1,290.00
05/15/25 BACCT 2023-A2 A2
DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028
05/15/25 05522RDH8 0.00 560.25 560.25
05/16/25 GMCAR 2024-1 A3
DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
05/16/25 36268GAD7 0.00 141.46 141.46
05/18/25 HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
05/18/25 43815QAC1 0.00 1,082.00 1,082.00
05/21/25 HAROT 2025-1 A3
DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029
05/21/25 43814VAC1 0.00 1,085.38 1,085.38
05/22/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 05/22/2015 3.750% 05/22/2025
05/22/25 38148LAE6 0.00 4,875.00 4,875.00
PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 24 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
52 Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
INTEREST
05/26/25 MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA
(CALLABLE)
DTD 05/30/2024 5.504% 05/26/2028
05/26/25 61690U8B9 0.00 10,182.40 10,182.40
05/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/02/2024 4.125% 11/30/2029
05/31/25 91282CMA6 0.00 6,084.38 6,084.38
05/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
05/31/25 91282CKT7 0.00 26,775.00 26,775.00
05/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2027
05/31/25 91282CFZ9 0.00 11,140.63 11,140.63
05/31/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/01/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
05/31/25 91282CCF6 0.00 4,293.75 4,293.75
Transaction Type Sub-Total 0.00 116,962.60 116,962.60
MATURITY
05/15/25 UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-BG (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025
05/15/25 91412HGE7 125,000.00 125,000.00 0.00 125,000.00 (452.50) 0.00 05/22/25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 05/22/2015 3.750% 05/22/2025
05/22/25 38148LAE6 260,000.00 260,000.00 0.00 260,000.00 (29,486.60) 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total 385,000.00 385,000.00 0.00 385,000.00 (29,939.10) 0.00
PAYDOWNS
05/25/25 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
05/01/25 3137BTUM1 549.83 549.83 0.00 549.83 16.92 7.57 05/25/25 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMN3 562.38 562.38 0.00 562.38 0.01 0.01
05/25/25 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMG8 177.40 177.40 0.00 177.40 2.65 1.81
05/25/25 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.182% 07/01/2028
05/01/25 3136BQDE6 2.14 2.14 0.00 2.14 0.04 0.03
05/25/25 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAMR4 1,894.61 1,894.61 0.00 1,894.61 29.73 20.55 PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 25 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
53 Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending May 31, 2025 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
PAYDOWNS
05/25/25 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
05/01/25 3137HAD45 299.11 299.11 0.00 299.11 0.00 0.00
05/15/25 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
05/15/25 31680EAD3 4,973.77 4,973.77 0.00 4,973.77 0.31 0.20 05/18/25 HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
05/18/25 43815QAC1 16,184.45 16,184.45 0.00 16,184.45 3.33 2.04 Transaction Type Sub-Total 24,643.69 24,643.69 0.00 24,643.69 52.99 32.21 SELL
05/14/25 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
05/12/25 91282CBC4 30,000.00 29,293.36 41.64 29,335.00 4.69 (611.60) FIFO Transaction Type Sub-Total 30,000.00 29,293.36 41.64 29,335.00 4.69 (611.60) Managed Account Sub-Total (28,569.38) 116,944.08 88,374.70 (29,881.42) (579.39) Total Security Transactions ($28,569.38) $116,944.08 $88,374.70 ($29,881.42) ($579.39) PFM Asset Management, a division of Account 20240100 Page 26 U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
54 AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.3
June 25, 2025
Planning Division Update
Prepared By:
David Murray, City Planner
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Planning Division Update.
Summary
Planning projects are provided in the a
ached Planning Project Status list. The list provides a brief summary and status of each project. New informa#on is highlighted in yellow. A map iden#fying the locations of each project is also included.
Background
The purpose of the Planning Division Update is to provide a list of the current status of major projects in the City of Eastvale.
Environmental
The following update requires no environmental review as it is not considered a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
The following update has no applicable fiscal impacts.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
55 Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.
Attachment(s)
Planning Division Update 6.25.25
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
56 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
March 16, 2022
Major Projects
Summary
June 25, 2025
City of Eastvale Planning Division
57 Planning Division Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
Contents
IN-PROCESS/REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 0BSUMNER PLACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (MAP ID: SMNR) ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 8BCHERRY TREE RESIDENTIAL...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 9BEASTVALE CARE FACILITY (SELBY) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 10BOASIS RESIDENTIAL................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 10BNEW RESTAURANT SHELL ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1BWIRELESS FACILITY – 7250 COBBLE CREEK ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 APPROVED/ ENTITLED ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 12BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PHASE A TTM (MAP ID: LEAL.1) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 13BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL OVERALL PHASE A DR (MAP ID: LEAL.2)............................................................................................................................................................. 9 14B3LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-1 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.3)..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 15BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-6 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.4)..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 16BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-7A PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.5)................................................................................................................................................................... 12 17B6LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-8 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.6)..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 18BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-2 QUARTERRA (MAP ID: LEAL.7)................................................................................................................................................................ 14 19BNEW HOME RECREATION CENTER .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 20BNEW HOME TTM 38595 PHASE B........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 2BNEW HOME OFF-SITE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 3BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-9............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 4BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11A ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 5BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11B......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 6BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11C......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 1BLEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-4 QUARTERRA PHASE II ............................................................................................................................................................................... 22 7BWARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 21B8GOODMAN COMMERCE CENTER (MAP ID: GCC)..................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 36B1GCC CR-1 Chili’s Alcohol CUP and VAR (MAP ID: GCC.13).......................................................................................................................................................... 25 37BGCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM (MAP ID: GCC.15) ................................................................................................................................................................ 26 2BHAMNER PLACE PAD-2 (MAP ID: HPLC.4) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 23BTHE RANCH (MAP ID: RNCH).............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 24BBEYOND FOOD MART AT THE RANCH (MAP ID: RNCH.5)......................................................................................................................................................................... 29 58 Planning Division Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
25BTHE RANCH TPM NO. 38114 (MAP ID: RNCH.6) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 38BHotel Suites (HPLC.1).................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 39BHamner Place Retail Suites D.R (HPLC.3) ................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 40BThe Merge (MAP ID: MRG) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33 26BWALMART (MAP ID: WMT) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 27BMISTER CARWASH (MAP ID: WMT)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 28BMCDONANLDS (MAP ID: WMT).......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 29BBETTER BUZZ (MAP ID: WMT)............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 30B8DUNKIN DONUTS AND CARWASH DR AND CUP (MAP ID: DUNK).............................................................................................................................................................. 38 31BARCHIBALD AND CHANDLER RETAIL (MAP ID: ACR) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 32BMAGNOLIA RANCH.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 3BST. OSCAR ROMERO MODULAR BUILDINGS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 41 FUTURE.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 34BTHE LEAL PLAN (MAP ID: LEAL)........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 59 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
1 60
Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
2 In-Process/Review
0BSumner Place Residential Development (MAP ID: SMNR)
Project: Sumner Place Residential Development Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 2.26.2025 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant and currently awaiting resubmittal.
Project No. PLN25-20005_GPA001_DR001_COZ001_ TTM
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Sumner Ave. and Schleisman Rd.; (Assessor Parcel Number: 152-040-01)
Project
Description:
General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Commercial Retail (CR 0.20-0.35 FAR) to Multi-Family-Low-Moderate (MF-LM 20.1-40 du/acre).
Change of Zone to change the zone from Heavy Agriculture (A-2) to General Residential (R-3).
Major Development Review for the development of a for-sale town home residential project consisting of 159-units on 7.5 acres.
Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 1.30.25
61 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
3 8BCherry Tree Residential
Project: Cherry Tree Residential Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The project has been deemed complete and is scheduled to be presented to the Planning Commission on the date of June 18, 2025.
Project No. PLN24-20092 TTM DR010 and PLN24-20057 SB330 Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Walters St. and Selby Ave.
Project
Description:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map for 39 lots for a single-family home community.
Major Development Review for the development of 39
single-family residential units, 38 attached ADUs, and 38 detached ADUs.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 10.28.24
▪ An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 11.26.24 ▪ On 3.3.25 the applicant resubmitted for plan review.
▪ A second incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 3.27.25 ▪ On 5.12.25 the applicant resubmitted for plan review.
N
62 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
4 9BEastvale Care Facility (Selby)
Project: Eastvale Care Facility Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 1.28.25 the applicant received an incomplete letter, and the Planning Division is awaiting resubmittal.
Project No. PLN24-20047 DR003 CUP003
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Walters St. & Selby Ave.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development
congregate care facility consisting of two single family homes.
Conditional Use Permit for the allowance of a residential care facility for the elderly for up to 14 persons per home (28 max).
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 6.20.24
▪ An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 7.11.24 ▪ Resubmittal received on 12.30.24
N
63 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
5 10BOasis Residential
Project: Oasis Residential Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 5.20.25 the applicant resubmitted the project to the Planning Division and is currently under review.
Project No. PLN25-20016 TTM002 DR002 SBB330
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Chandler Ave. & Hellman Ave.
Project
Description:
Tentative Tract Map for 65 lots for a single-family home community and 2 open space lots.
Major Development Review for the development of 65
single-family residential units.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 3.19.25
▪ On 4.17.25 the applicant received an incomplete letter. 64 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
6 10BNew Restaurant Shell
Project: Commercial Restaurant Building Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On May 20, 2025 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant and currently awaiting resubmittal.
Project No. PLN25-20031 DR003
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road. & Goodman Way.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of a new
restaurant building of 5,780 sq. ft. located on 1.17-acre vacant lot.
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Received application on 4.23.25
65 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
7 1BWireless Facility – 7250 Cobble Creek
Project: Providence Ranch Monopine Project Map:
Current Status:
▪On 11.20.24 the Planning Commission continued the project off calendar.
The Planning Division is waiting for a resubmittal.
Project No. PLN24-20030 MDR010
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Hallow Brook Way and Westerly Way. East of Cobble Creek
Project
Description:
Minor Development Review for the development of an unmanned telecom facility consisting of 70 ft. tall monopine 14 panel antennas mounted on the monopine, 35 RRUs mounted behind the antennas, and necessary equipment area.
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Received application on 4.30.24
▪ The project was scheduled for planning commission on 6.19.24. ▪ On 6.19.24 the planning commission continued the project to a future date. ▪ A second submittal was submitted for review.
▪ The project was scheduled for planning commission on 11.20.24. 66 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
8 Approved/ Entitled
12BLeal Ranch Residential Phase A TTM (MAP ID: LEAL.1)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential Tentative Tract Map (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20087 TTM No. 38594
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Tentative Tract Map to create 64 lots over 69.8 acres of land to facilitate various site improvements and initiate the residential development of PA-1, PA-6, PA-7A, and PA-8 of the Leal Ranch Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20087 and is subject to conditions of approval.
67 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
9 13BLeal Ranch Residential Overall Phase A DR (MAP ID: LEAL.2) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Overall DR (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20088 DR006
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the overall Leal Phase A Residential Development and associated site improvements (PA-1, PA-6, PA-7A, and PA-8)
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20087 and is subject to conditions of approval.
68 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
10 14B3Leal Ranch Residential PA-1 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.3) Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-1 (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20089 DR007
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Scholar Way.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 168 new residential units within Planning Area 1 of the Leal Master Plan. Plan types will consist of townhomes (10 plex and 11 plex).
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20089 and is subject to conditions of approval.
69 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
11 15BLeal Ranch Residential PA-6 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.4) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area- 6 (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20090 DR008
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 102 new residential units within Planning Area 6 of the Leal Master Plan. Plan types will consist of townhomes (Duplex to 6 plex).
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20090 and is subject to conditions of approval.
70 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
12 16BLeal Ranch Residential PA-7A Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.5) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area-7A (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20091 DR009
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Scholar Way.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 94 single family residential units within Planning Area-7A of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20091 and is subject to conditions of approval.
71 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
13 17B6Leal Ranch Residential PA-8 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.6) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area 8 (Phase A) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20092 DR010
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 74 single family residential units within Planning Area 8 of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 12.21.22
▪ Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review. ▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20092 and is subject to conditions of approval.
72 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
14 18BLeal Ranch Residential PA-2 Quarterra (MAP ID: LEAL.7) Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-2 Quarterra Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Construction document have been submitted with the Building Division and are currently under review.
Project No. PLN23-20036 DR006
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and of Scholar Way. South of 58th St.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 320 new residential units within Planning Area 2 of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on June 9, 2023.
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
▪ Application was resubmitted on August 31, 2023
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on September 27, 2023 ▪ Application was resubmitted on November 14, 2023
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on December 7, 2023 ▪ Application was resubmitted on January 18, 2024
▪ Planning Commission approval on February 21, 2024
▪ On February 21, 2024, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23-20036, with conditions of Approval.
73 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
15 19BNew Home Recreation Center
Project: New Home Rec Center Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Construction documents have been submitted for review with the Building Division and Public Works Department.
Project No. PLN24-20075 MDR014
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and of Scholar Way. South of 58th St.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the site planning and architecture of the proposed recreation center within the Leal Ranch Master plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.18.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 10.24.24
▪ On 11.20.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ The project was deemed complete and scheduled for planning commission for
2.19.25. ▪ On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20075 and is subject to conditions of approval.
74 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
16 20BNew Home TTM 38595 Phase B
Project: Tentative Tract Map Phase B Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20074 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20074 TTM #38594 PH B
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Tentative Tract Map for the development of an existing lot into 46 total lots for condominium purposes (37 residential, 1 commercial, 3 for open space and 5 for private street purposes) of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 9, 10, 11A, 11B, and 11C of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.18.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 10.24.24
▪ On 11.6.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ The project was resubmitted on 12.11.24
▪ The project was deemed complete and is currently scheduled for planning commission on 2.19.25
75 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
17 2BNew Home Off-site
Project: Tentative Tract Map Phase B Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 3.19.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20069 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20069 DR004
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review to establish the off-site streets and layout of Phase B of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
▪ On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent to the applicant. ▪ On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review. ▪ On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
76 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
18 3BLeal Ranch Residential PA-9
Project: Planning Area 9 Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20070 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20070 DR005
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 90 residential units (triplexes) on Lots 30-36 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 9 of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
▪ On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review. ▪ On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
▪ The item was heard by Planning Commission on March 19, 2025 and was continued to the following meeting date of April 16,2025. 77 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
19 4BLeal Ranch Residential PA-11A
Project: Planning Area 11A Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20071 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20071 DR006
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 91 residential units (duplexes and triplexes) on lot 1-9 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11A of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
▪ On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review. ▪ On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
78 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
20 5BLeal Ranch Residential PA-11B
Project: Planning Area 11B Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20072 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20072 DR007
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 90 residential units (6-plex and 8-plexes) on Lots 10-18 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11B of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
▪ On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review. ▪ On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
79 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
21 6BLeal Ranch Residential PA-11C
Project: Planning Area 11C Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20073 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20073 DR008
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 63 residential units (triplexes) on Lots 19-29 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11C of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 8.21.24
▪ On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
▪ On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review. ▪ On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
80 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
22 1BLeal Ranch Residential PA-4 Quarterra Phase II
Project: Planning Area 4 Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 5.21.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20035 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20035 DR001
Project
Location:
Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for the development of 360 multi-family residential units on 10.6 acres within Planning Areas 4 & 10 of the Leal Master Plan.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 5.7.24
▪ An incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 6.3.24 ▪ On 7.24.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review. ▪ A second incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 8.12.24 ▪ On 10.14.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review. ▪ A third incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 11.7.24 ▪ On 12.19.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review. ▪ A fourth incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 1.16.25 ▪ On 4.7.25 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review. ▪ The project was scheduled for Planning Commission on the date of 5.21.25. 81 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
23 7BWarmington Residential
Project: Warmington Residential Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On 05.28.2025 City Council approved entitlements for PLN24-20053 and is subject to conditions of approval.
Project No. PLN24-20053 TTM001 DR003 SB330
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Grapewin St. & Archibald Ave.
Project
Description:
Tentative Tract Map for 76 lots for a single family home community.
Major Development Review for the development of 76
single-family residential units.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 6.27.24
▪ An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 7.10.24 documents were resubmitted
▪ A second incomplete letter has been sent to applicant on 8.06.24 ▪ A third incomplete letter has been sent to applicant on 10.17.24 ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
▪ The project was heard by the Planning Commission on 3.19.25 meeting and recommended to the City Council for approval. ▪ The project was heard by the City Council on 4.23.25 where action was to continue the project for the next scheduled City Council date on May 28, 2025.
N
82 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
24 21B8Goodman Commerce Center (MAP ID: GCC)
Project: Goodman Commerce Center (formally Lewis Eastvale Commerce Center) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Various buildings complete, operating and under
construction.
Project No. 11-0271 **see related projects below
Project
Location:
190 acres +/- fronting on Hamner Ave. north of Bellegrave Ave. and south of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
Project
Description:
General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Specific Plan to provide a mix of warehousing, light industrial, office, and retail uses. Major Development Review for the development of two industrial buildings of approximately 1,007,705 square feet and 1,033,192 square feet.
CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (certified)
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Approved by City Council on November 12, 2014
See the following projects for more recent activity at the Goodman Commerce Center Development:
▪ Project No. PLN17-20033 Retail Building CR-3 – Starbucks & other tenants (GCC.1) ▪ Project No. PLN18-20014 Retail Building CR-12 – Quick Quack Carwash (GCC.2) ▪ Project No. PLN18-20042 Retail Building CR-11 – Multi-Tenant (GCC.3) ▪ Project No. PLN19-20006 Retail Building CR-10- Chick-fil-A (GCC.4) ▪ Project No. PLN19-20063 Retail Building CR-8 – Altura Credit Union (GCC.5) ▪ Project No. PLN19-20064 Retail Building CR-6 (GCC.6)
▪ Project No. PLN20-20018 Retail Building CR-6A, CRA, CR-B, CR-C ▪ Project No. PLN21-20063 Retail Building CR-1 – Chili’s ▪ Project No. PLN21-20068 Retail Building CR-2 – Olive Garden ▪ Project No. PLN22-20025 Planning Area-4 Development
83 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
25 36B1GCC CR-1 Chili’s Alcohol CUP and VAR (MAP ID: GCC.13) Project: GCC CR-1 Alcohol CUP and VAR Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Project is currently on hold per developer.
Project No.: PLN22-20010_CUP002_VAR001
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd.; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 160-510-023
Project
Description:
Conditional Use Permit for the on-sale and consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits at a 7,757 square foot PAD building (CR-1) restaurant (dba Chili’s).
Variance to request modification to the sign standards to allow four (4) tenant wall signs.
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on March 7, 2022
▪ On April 20, 2022, PLN22-20012 was approved by the Planning Commission subject to conditions of approval.
84 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
26 37BGCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM (MAP ID: GCC.15)
Project: GCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Building Permits issued on November 28,2023 and are currently under construction.
Project No.: PLN22-20025 CR-13 and TPM No. 38438, PLN22-20056 DR CR-14, PLN22- 20057 DR CR-15, PLN22-20058 DR CR-16, PLN22-20059 DR CR-17 Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Goodman Way (Assessor Parcel Number: 160-510-010, -011, -012, -013, -015, -016, and -033) Project
Description:
Major Development Review (DR) for development of five (5) business park buildings ranging in size from 40,000 sf to 59,987 sf in Planning Area 4 of the Goodman Commerce Center in Eastvale Specific Plan.
TPM No. 38438: For the reconfiguration of a 14.4-acre site into five (5) individual parcels.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on April 20, 2022.
▪ Project was deemed incomplete by Staff on May 19, 2022. ▪ Received resubmittal on August 8, 2022.
▪ Project was deemed incomplete by Staff on August 24, 2022. ▪ Project was deemed complete by Staff on September 28, 2022. ▪ On October 19,2022, the Planning Commission approved PLN22-20025, -56 through -59 subject to conditions of approval.
85 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
27 2BHamner Place Pad-2 (MAP ID: HPLC.4)
Project: PAD-2 at Hamner Place Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The Shell for pad 2 received approved building plans and grading plans and is currently under construction.
Project No. PLN24-20019_MDR008_CUP001
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Schleisman Rd. and of Hamner Ave.
Project
Description:
New 4,250 sq. ft. multi-tenant shops with pick-up drive-up lane.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 2.26.24
▪ On March 21, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant, awaiting resubmittal.
▪ May 1, 2024 applicant resubmitted.
▪ June 3, 2024 the application was deemed complete and tentatively scheduled for July planning commission.
▪ On July 17, 2024 The Planning Commission approved the entitlements for PLN24-20019 and is subject to conditions of approval.
86 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
28 23BThe Ranch (MAP ID: RNCH)
Project: The Ranch Project Map
Current Status:
▪ Approved.
▪ Continue discussing potential development for commercial portion. ▪ Construction of six industrial/warehouse buildings are completed. ▪ A resolution for the Final Cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract for the Rodriguez Site was adopted by City Council meeting on July 24, 2019.
Project No. 15-0783
Project
Location:
Northeast and southeast corners of Hellman and future Limonite (Kimball) Avenues, west of Cucamonga Creek Channel.
Moons Site (APNs: 144-010-008-0, 144-101-013-4) and Rodriguez Site (APN:
144-010-009-1)
Project
Description:
• Specific Plan Amendment to modify boundaries for Planning Areas 1 through 6, land use designation for Planning Area 5, and revisions to allowable uses. No revisions to Planning Areas 7 through 9. • Major Development Review for six (6) industrial buildings totaling 985,000 square feet on six (6) parcels.
• Tentative Parcel Map No. 36787 to subdivide approximately 97 gross acres into 14 legal parcels.
CEQA: EIR Addendum
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Approved by City Council on December 9, 2015.
▪ February 19, 2016, a new owner purchased the six (6) industrial lots. ▪ Monument Sign approved on February 1, 2018.
▪ See the following projects for more recent activity at The Ranch:
▪ Project No. PLN18-20007: Eastvale 88,000 square-foot Warehouse building in Planning Area 3. (RNCH.1)
▪ Project No. PLN18-20050: Howard Industrial -Major Development Review, Tentative Map for Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 (RNCH.2)
▪ Project No. PLN19-20034: Transwestern – Major Development Review, Amendment to Tentative Parcel Map for Planning Areas 7, 8, and 9 (RNCH.3) ▪ Project No. PLN19-20035: Summit Development – Major Development Review for Planning Area 6 (RNCH.4)
87 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
29 24BBeyond Food Mart at The Ranch (MAP ID: RNCH.5)
Project: Beyond Food Mart Major Development Review and Conditional Use Permit(s) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The Building Permits have been issued and is currently under construction.
Project No. PLN21-20014_DR002_CUP003
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Hellman Ave. and Limonite Ave. at The Ranch Specific Plan (Assessor Parcel Number: 144-010-077)
Project
Description:
Major Development Review, for the construction of a new 7,150 square-foot Beyond Food Mart with a single lane drive-through operation, a 5,177 square-foot canopy, and a 2,312 square-foot drive-through carwash
Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of automobile service station with concurrent off sale of beer and wine (Type 20)
Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of a C-Store with a drive-through Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of a drive-through carwash Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 3.17.21
▪ On November 17, 2021, the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20014, subject to conditions of approval.
88 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
30 25BThe Ranch TPM No. 38114 (MAP ID: RNCH.6)
Project: The Ranch TPM No. 38114 Project Map:
Current Status:
The Building Permits of PLN21-20014 have been issued
and is currently under construction.
Project No. PLN22-20009_TPM38114
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Hellman Avenue; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 144- 010-077
Project
Description:
Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide one (1) 10.68 acres into two (2) individual parcels.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on March 2, 2022
▪ On May 18th, 2022, the Planning Commission approved project PLN22-20009, subject to conditions of approval.
▪ On November 17, 2021, the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20014. 89 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
31 38BHotel Suites (HPLC.1)
Project: Hotel - Staybridge Suites at Hamner Place Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The Staybridge Suites has obtained Certificate of Occupancy and is fully operational.
Project No. PLN19-20023
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road; (Assessor Parcel Number: 152-050-050)
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for a hotel and a banquet facility and a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of alcohol for on-site consumption.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on June 6, 2019.
See the following project for more information:
▪ PLN17-20015: Hamner Place (former Polopolus Property) ▪ Approved by Planning Commission on June 19, 2019.
▪ Building plans received for review on January 30, 2020. 90 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
32 39BHamner Place Retail Suites D.R (HPLC.3)
Project: Hamner Place Retail Suites – Major Development Review (DR) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The Building is currently operational.
Project No. PLN19-20053
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road;
(Assessor’s Parcel Number: 152-060-003)
Project
Description:
Major Development Review for a multi-tenant building to include retail suites and a potential restaurant. The restaurant is proposed to be 5,910 square feet and the shops portion of the building is 2,270 square feet for a total building floor area of 9,190 square feet.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on November 21, 2019.
▪ On December 18, 2019, the Planning Commission approved project PLN19-20053 subject to conditions of approval.
91 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
33 40BThe Merge (MAP ID: MRG)
Project: The Merge Retail and Industrial Center Project Map:
Current Status:
• The Merge Industrial and Retail have completed construction. • Pad 2 is currently under Tenant Improvements with the Building Division.
Project No. PLN18-20026
Project
Location:
Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue; APN: 164-010- 019-6
Project
Description:
Major Development Review, Tentative Parcel Map, and Variance for the development of a retail and light industrial center on an approximately 26-acre site, and various Conditional Use Permits for certain uses.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on May 24, 2018; Development plans received on June 26, 2018.
▪ Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) available for a 45-day public review period from September 18, 2018, to November 2, 2018.
▪ Condition Use Permits application submitted on October 1, 2018. ▪ November 21, 2018, Planning Commission recommended approval of all applications, plus added new conditions for the Major Development Review application.
▪ December 12, 2018, City Council certified the EIR and approved all applications as recommended by the Planning Commission including the new conditions recommended by the Planning Commission, plus the Council added one new condition for the Major Development Review. January 9, 2019, City Council conducted second reading of ordinance for Change of Zone. ▪ Construction building plans for industrial buildings 1-6 approved by Planning
11.25.19 ▪ Sprouts (Major 1) is completed and in operation 10.28.20 92 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
34 26BWalmart (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Walmart – Eastvale Crossings Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ The site is actively under construction.
Project No. PLN12-0051, PLN21-20021_DR002 (Ref. PLN12-0051) Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Limonite and Archibald Avenues (APN 144-030-039) Project
Description:
General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Major Development Review, five Conditional Use Permits, Tentative Tract Map No. 35061, and Variance for the development of a 177,000 +/- sq. ft. retail store and several outparcels on 24.78 acres.
CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (certified)
Major Development Review for the construction of a Walmart gasoline service station with an ancillary 1,620 square foot convenience store located on Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract Map No. 35061
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ City Council approval on April 26, 2017.
▪ Project was reviewed by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission and received a conditional finding of conformance with the Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. ▪ Public review of DEIR available from September 27 to November 17, 2016. ▪ On March 15, 2017, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the project to City Council. ▪ City Council public hearing on April 12, 2017, with a staff recommendation to continue the hearing to April 26, 2017. ▪ City Council approval on April 26, 2017. Notice of Determination recorded on April 27, 2017. ▪ Waiting for applicant to submit construction plans.
▪ Extension of Time (PLN19-20052) has been approved by the Planning Commission on 1.15.2020 ▪ Extension of Time (PLN19-20052) has been approved by the Planning Commission on 1.15.2020 ▪ Extension of Time (PLN21-20021 MDR002) has been approved by the planning department on 11.02.2021. ▪ Minor Development Review (PLN22-20012 MDR002) has been approved by the planning department on 1.24.2023 ▪ Extension of Time (PLN22-20017 EOT 001) has been approved by the planning department on 10.20.2021 ▪ On April 26, 2023, the City Council approved Final Map TR35061. 93 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
35 27BMister Carwash (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Mister Car Wash Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Building Division has construction plans ready to issue. ▪ Public Works department is currently awaiting submittal for grading.
Project No. PLN24-20024_DR001_CUP002
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:
New 5,435 sq. ft. building with 3 queuing lanes funneling into a 130’ tunnel which leads out to 26 vacuum stalls.
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Received application on 3.25.24
▪ On April 23, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent to the applicant ▪ On June 11, 2024 resubmittal was received.
▪ On July 10, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent to the applicant ▪ On August 20, 2024, the Planning Division deemed the project complete ▪ On September 18, 2024 the Planning Commission approved project PLN24- 20024, subject to conditions of approval.
94 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
36 28BMcDonanlds (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: McDonalds Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20089 and is subject to conditions of approval.
▪ Currently awaiting construction documents to be submitted with the Building Division and Public Works Department .
Project No. PLN24-20089_DR009
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:
New 4,375 sq. ft. building with drive thru lane.
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Received application on 10.15.24
▪ An incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 11.14.24 ▪ On 1.6.25 the project was resubmitted for second round of review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for the 2.19.25 planning Commission.
95 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
37 29BBetter Buzz (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Better Buzz Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20091 and is subject to conditions of approval.
▪ Currently awaiting construction documents to be submitted with the Building Division and Public Works Department.
Project No. PLN24-20091_MDR015
Project
Location:
Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:
New 1,770 sq. ft. building with patio and drive-thru
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Received application on 10.28.24
▪ On 11.21.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ On 1.21.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for second round of review. ▪ The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for the 2.19.25 planning Commission.
96 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
38 30B8Dunkin Donuts and Carwash DR and CUP (MAP ID: DUNK) Project: Dunkin Donuts and Carwash DR and CUP Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ All-American Carwash has received TCO and is currently operational. ▪ Dunkin Donuts have pulled permits currently awaiting to being construction.
Project No. PLN21-20030_DR_003_CUP_007 Dunkin Donuts and PLN21- 20060_DR006_CUP011 American Express Carwash
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Schleisman and Hamner Ave.; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 152-341-017
Project
Description:
Major Development Review (DR): For the development of a 3,400 square foot multi-tenant building where 1,600 square feet will be for a Dunkin Donuts with a drive-through and outdoor patio and where 1,800 square feet will be for a bistro with an outdoor patio. (PLN21- 20030)
Major Development Review (DR): for the development of a 5,113 square foot car/truck wash with 18 vacuum stalls. (PLN21-20060) Conditional Use Permit (CUP): To allow the operation of a drivethrough for the proposed coffee shop. (PLN21-20030) Conditional Use Permit (CUP): To allow the operation of a drivethrough for the proposed car/truck wash use. (PLN21-20060) Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on 5.26.21
▪ Applicant has provided updated submittal package 5.9.22 ▪ On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20030 and PLN21-20060, subject to conditions of approval.
▪ The building division has approved constructions plans. 97 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
39 31BArchibald and Chandler Retail (MAP ID: ACR)
Project: Archibald and Chandler Retail Center Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Awaiting submittal of Final parcel map to Public Works Department.
▪ Quick Quack has submitted for grading to public works and construction documents to building division.
▪ Dutch Bros has submitted for grading to public works and construction documents to building division.
▪ Overall site grading has been submitted to public works. ▪ Zendejas has submitted construction documents for plan check with the building division.
Project No. PLN23-20018 TPM #37653, PLN23-20019 MDR004 CUP002, PLN23-20020 MDR005 CUP003, PLN23-20020 MDR006
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Archibald and Chandler; (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 144- 130-004, 144-130-011, 144-130-012, 144-130-013)
Project
Description:
Tentative Parcel Map (37653) to parcelize a 2.71-acre site into three (3) parcels.
Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 0.81-acre parcel comprised of a 3,500 square feet sit-down restaurant (Zendejas) Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 1.18-acre parcel a 3,598 square feet drive-through carwash (Quick Quack Express Carwash)
Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 0.75-acre parcel with a 950 square feet drive-through coffee shop (Dutch Bros).
Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a drive-through coffee shop.
Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a drive-through carwash.
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 04.11.23
▪ On 5/9/2023 comments were returned to the applicant.
▪ On July 27, 2023 the project was resubmitted.
▪ On August 24, 2023 a correction letter was sent out to the applicant. ▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023.
▪ The item was continued to the November 15, 2023 Planning Commission. ▪ The Item was continued to the December 20,2023 Planning Commission. ▪ On December 20, 2023, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23- 20018 TPM #37653, PLN23-20019 MDR004 CUP002, PLN23-20020 MDR005 CUP003, PLN23-20020 MDR006
98 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
40 32BMagnolia Ranch
Project: Magnolia Ranch (Woodside) Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Building plans were issued on 2.13.2025 and the project is currently under construction.
Project No. PLN23-20043 DR005
Project
Location:
Southwest of Schleisman Rd. and Scholar Way. North of Orange St.
Project
Description:
Development Review for the development of 41 traditional singlefamily homes on lots of a minimum 55’ x 90 (4950 SF) Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪Application submitted on July 6, 2023.
▪Application was deemed incomplete on July 6, 2023
▪Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23-20043 and is subject to conditions of approval.
99 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
41 3BSt. Oscar Romero Modular Buildings
Project: St. Oscar Romero’s Modular Buildings Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Building Division has issued permits for construction and is currently under construction.
Project No. PLN23-20038 MDR008
Project
Location:
Northwest corner of Chandler St. and of Selby Ave. North of Retriever St.
Project
Description:
Minor Development Review for the development of 2 temporary 1,059 square feet (total of 2,118 square feet) Modular Office Building with accessible stairs, ramps, restrooms, parking and connected walkway.
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪Application submitted on July 6, 2023.
▪Application was deemed incomplete on July 6, 2023
▪Application was deemed incomplete on July 24, 2023
▪Application was resubmitted on August 21, 2023
▪Application was deemed complete on September 7, 2023.
100
Planning Department Major Projects Summary
June 25, 2025
1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.
2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.
3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information
42 Future
34BThe Leal Plan (MAP ID: LEAL)
Project: Leal Master Plan Project Map:
Current Status:
▪ Construction documents are currently under review
for phase A of Leal Master Plan. Awaiting submission
of entitlements application for phase B.
Project No. Special Project
Project
Location:
160 acres + at the northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.
Project
Description:
This Master Plan describes the community’s vision for the project area, identifies appropriate land uses, and includes the development standards that are necessary to achieve the vision, defines the character of the project’s development, lists the steps involved with the development process, and provides the project’s implementation plan.
CEQA: EIR
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ In September 16, 2016, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council.
May 2017 – City has been asked by property owner’s representative to postpone action on the project while issues related to the estate of Brad Leal are resolved August 30, 2017 – City met with Leal family and prospective developer to discuss processing and timing. ▪ City Council Approved Master Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report on December 13, 2017. ▪ Adopted by City Council on December 13, 2017.
▪ Staff continues to coordinate with the property owners as they seek a developer(s) for the site. ▪ Planning Commission recommend approval to City Council on April 26, 2022 ▪ On May 11, 2022, the City Council approved the Leal Masterplan Amendment (PLN21-20039) and related entitlements (DA, TTM 382290, DR PLN22-20020)
▪ On May 25, 2022, the City Council approved the second reading of the ordinances for the Leal Master Plan Amendment (PLN21-20039) and Development Agreement (PLN22-20039). ▪ On August 24, 2022, Lot Line Adjustment (2022-001) was recorded with the Assessor-County Clerk Recorder.
101
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.4
June 25, 2025
Public Works Department Update
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Public Works Department update.
Summary
The Public Works Department provides monthly updates on residen"al and commercial development projects, encroachment permits, capital improvements projects including a grant summary.
Background
Not applicable.
Analysis
Not applicable.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
102
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - PW Project Update List.pdf
Attachment 2 - PW Grants Summary.pdf
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
103
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Project (Phase 1)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A design build project to construct a Phase 1 of the Civic Center Project, which includes approximately 52,000 square foot City Hall, a 25,000 square foot library, a 20,000 square foot police station with a park and a civic plaza.
PROJECT STATUS: Bidding: project was advertised for bid to prequalified General Contractors on 4/10/2025.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: Bid Opening: May 2025.
Construction Award: June 2025.
PROJECT RENDERING:
104
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity/ATP Trails PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and construct nearly 5 miles of multipurpose trails running along Scholar Way and Harrison Avenue. The project will provide dedicated space for people to bike and walk from northern City limit to the Santa Ana River Trail on the south.
PROJECT STATUS: In Design – Engineering: Design contract was awarded to Mark Thomas. 75% PS&E (phase 3) was delivered on February 5, 2025 and is being reviewed, and non-infrastructure component of the project (phase 2) which includes public education and engagement is on going.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: 100% PS&E is anticipated to be delivered by June 30, 2025.
PROJECT MAP:
105
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Gap Pedestrian Bridge
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install a prefabricated steel fabricated bridge over Cucamonga Creek Channel to close the gap of pedestrian path within the SCE easement.
PROJECT STATUS: : In Design – Engineering: Design contract was awarded to TYLin on April 10, 2024. 65% PS&E was delivered on February 17, 2025 and is being reviewed. Technical studies are being prepared to submit to Caltrans for NEPA EA.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: 100% PS&E is anticipated to be delivered by December 2025.
PROJECT MAP:
106
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Median Improvement Projects at River Rd, Cantu Galleano Rd, and Archibald Ave
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will Install landscaped raised medians at River Rd, Cantu Galleano Rd, and Archibald Ave to physically separate opposing traffic streams and help stop vehicles traveling into opposing traffic lanes.
The project will be constructed in two phases: Phase 1 will involve the construction of hardscape including curb, gutter, and sleeve for future utilities, and Phase 2 will include the installation of landscaping, monument, and lighting.
PROJECT STATUS: In Construction: The punchlist for Phase 1 has been issued. Phase 2 was advertised on 3/19/2025, with a due date of 4/10/2025.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The construction contract for Phase 2 will be awarded in May 2025.
PROJECT IMAGE:
107
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Signal Improvement at Sumner Ave and 68th St PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install traffic signals at the intersection of Sumner Ave and 68th Street.
PROJECT STATUS: In Design – Engineering: This project has been selected for HSIP Cycle 12 funding. A funding allocation request will be submitted for the PE phase to begin the RFP process for selecting a design consultant.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The PE phase must be allocated by 12/31/2025.
PROJECT IMAGE:
108
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Hellman Avenue Street Widening and Walters Pedestrian Bridge PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves widening Hellman Avenue from Walters Street to River Road to eliminate bottlenecks and improve traffic flow. The scope includes conducting a feasibility study, preparing environmental documents, right-of-way easement documents, and PS&E. The project will be completed in two phases: 1) Widening of Hellman Avenue north of Chandler Avenue, including lot grading south of Rondo Elementary School and bridge widening. 2) Widening of Hellman Avenue from Shortham Street to River Road. The feasibility study will determine the most efficient approach for phasing the project.
PROJECT STATUS: In Feasibility Study: This project is receiving TUMF funding.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: Construction for Phase 1 is tentatively scheduled for FY 2026-27, with Phase 2 planned for FY 2027-2028.
PROJECT IMAGE:
109
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Merge
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 26 gross acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements complete All off-site improvements have been accepted. Formation of CFD ongoing
PROJECT MAP:
ARCHIBALD AVE
LIMONITE AVE
110
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch by Transwestern
PROJECT NUMBER: PW19-11322
PROJECT LOCATION: East end of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 20 gross acres including 2 light industrial warehouses.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements have been completed, the City and Developer are working together to close out the project. Formation of CFD ongoing.
PROJECT MAP: CUCAMONGA CREEK HELLMAN AVE
111
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Homestead
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10052
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 55.86 gross acres consisting of six industrial buildings
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvements complete
Developer is also responsible for improvements along Archibald Avenue which are currently underway and in the final stages of approval. Formation of CFD ongoing.
PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE ARCHIBALD AVE
112
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Hamner Place
PROJECT NUMBER: PW18-10712
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 21.48 gross acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
Chipotle has applied for a grading permit.
PROJECT MAP: HAMNER AVE
113
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch (Parcel 14)
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10007
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include the development of 61,000 square foot industrial building. Formation of CFD ongoing.
PROJECT STATUS: Developer has finalized the project.
PROJECT MAP: CUCAMONGA CREEK
114
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Eastwalk/ Leal
PROJECT NUMBER: PW22-1004
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Hamner Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 158.6 acre development that will include approximately 2500 residential units as well as plans for future commercial development PROJECT STATUS: Developer has obtained precise grading, street, sewer and water, and building permits.
Phase A homes are now on sale.
PROJECT MAP:
HAMNER AVENUE SCHOLAR WAY
58TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
115
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Walmart
PROJECT NUMBER: PW23-10004
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 177,000 square foot retail center on 23.3 acres PROJECT STATUS: Developer has obtained precise grading, street, sewer and water, and building permits.
PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE ARCHIBALD AVE
116
AGENCY GRANT NAME PROJECT NAME GRANT AWARD MATCH DUE DATE STATUS California Transportation
Commission/California
Department of Transportation
ATP: Active Transportation Project Cycle 4 Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity $ 6,471,000.00 $ 1,620,000.00
Grant request has been
approved. The project is currently
under design.
USDOT: Department of
Transportation
Congressman Calvert: 2023 Transportation
and Infrastructure Appropriations Bill Limonite Gap Pedistrian Bridge 1,600,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ This grant is for construction
phaseo only. The project is
currently under design.
California Department of
Resources Recycling and
Recovery
CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement (TRP)
Grant Program (TRP16-23-0047) Annual Overlay/Residential Slurry Seal Project $ 170,586.00 April 1, 2026
California Department of
Transportation
HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement Program
Cycle 12
Traffic Signal Improvement at Sumner and 68th $ 79,398.00 642,402.00 $ March 31, 2028 Allocation request for PE phase will be submitted.
PUBLIC WORKS GRANTS SUMMARY
GRANTS AWARDED
117
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.5
June 25, 2025
City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – April 2025
Prepared By:
Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Eastvale Crime Statistics for April 2025.
Summary
The City Council requested staff collaborate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to develop a crime sta&s&cs document that would reflect selected Part I and Part II crime data for the City of Eastvale. Intended to show month-to-month crime sta&s&cs, the document will assist in determining appropriate staffing levels for law enforcement services.
Background
In May 2017, City Council directed staff to coordinate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to request and obtain monthly crime sta&s&cs for the City of Eastvale. The primary intent of the request was to determine appropriate staffing levels during the City’s contract nego&a&ons with the Sheriff’s Department. Over several weeks, the city manager and staff worked collabora&vely with Riverside County Sheriff’s Department administra&on and management to obtain crime statistics that could be shared with the public on a regular basis.
Upon receiving the data, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department advised staff that the data provided would be reflec&ve of the previous month, or thirty days behind the current month; and that the report would need to include a disclaimer iden&fying the data as preliminary and raw. At the July 26, 2017 mee&ng, City Council recommended that staff add columns reflec&ve of felony and misdemeanor arrests. During the September 26, 2017 mee&ng, City Council recommended staff add traffic viola&ons/cita&ons data and the total calls for service broken down per month. Crime 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
118
sta&s&cs that were released in the &me that passed since the last mee&ng of the City Council are attached.
Environmental
Crime sta&s&cs are not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable
Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 25, 2017, the Public Safety Commission approved the receival of a monthly crime sta&s&cs report.
On July 26, 2017, the City Council approved the receival of a monthly crime sta&s&cs report and requested columns reflective of felony and misdemeanor arrests.
On September 26, 2017, the City Council recommended that the report include traffic viola&ons and citations data.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale Crime Statistics Report April 2025 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
119
PART I CRIMES FEB 2024 FEB 2025 MAR 2024 MAR 2025 APR 2024 APR 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Arson 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Aggravated Assault 21 11 20 19 18 23 160 64
Burglary 11 2 13 7 7 8 120 35
Larceny Theft 105 54 92 63 80 64 1,000 226
Rape 0 0 2 1 0 0 14 3
Robbery 5 4 3 2 3 2 24 8
Vehicle Theft 9 5 12 9 12 4 129 24
Total Part I Crimes 151 76 142 102 120 101 1,448 361
PART I CRIME FEB 2024 FEB 2025 MAR 2024 MAR 2025 APR 2024 APR 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rape 0 0 2 1 0 0 14 3
Robbery 5 4 3 2 3 2 24 8
Aggravated Assault 21 11 20 19 18 23 160 64
Arson 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Total Violent Crimes 26 15 25 23 21 25 199 76
PROPERTY CRIMES FEB 2024 FEB 2025 MAR 2024 MAR 2025 APR 2024 APR 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Burglary 11 2 13 7 7 8 120 35
Vehicle Theft 9 5 12 9 12 4 129 24
Larceny Theft 105 54 92 63 80 64 1,000 226
Total Property Crimes 125 61 117 79 99 76 1,336 285
CALL NATURE FEB 2024 FEB 2025 MAR 2024 MAR 2025 APR 2024 APR 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Mail Theft 11 9 14 8 3 12 87 36
Total Calls 2,041 2,094 2,384 2,138 2,401 2,271 27,037 8,484 CHARGE LEVEL FEB 2024 FEB 2025 MAR 2024 MAR 2025 APR 2024 APR 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Felony Arrests 11 4 12 16 10 17 133 48
Misdemeanor Arrests 22 21 29 25 22 24 366 102
Total Arrests 33 25 41 41 32 41 499 150
TOTAL ARRESTS
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.
CITY OF EASTVALE
Crime Data & Statistics
90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL PART I CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL VIOLENT CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
CALLS FOR SERVICE 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
PART I CRIMES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Homicide 0 0 0 0 0
Arson 0 0 1 0 1
Aggravated Assault 11 11 19 23 64
Burglary 18 2 7 8 35
Larceny Theft 45 54 63 64 226
Rape 2 0 1 0 3
Robbery 0 4 2 2 8
Vehicle Theft 6 5 9 4 24
Total Crime 82 76 102 101 361
PART I CRIME JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Homicide 0 0 0 0 0
Rape 2 0 1 0 3
Robbery 0 4 2 2 8
Aggravated Assault 11 11 19 23 64
Arson 0 0 1 0 1
Total Crime 13 15 23 25 76
PROPERTY CRIMES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Burglary 18 2 7 8 35
Vehicle Theft 6 5 9 4 24
Larceny Theft 45 54 63 64 226
Total Crime 69 61 79 76 285
CALL NATURE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Mail Thefts 7 9 8 12 36
Total Calls 1,981 2,094 2,138 2,271 8,484
CHARGE LEVEL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Felony Arrests 11 4 16 17 48
Misdemeanor 32 21 25 24 102
Total Arrests 43 25 41 41 150
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.
CITY OF EASTVALE
Crime Data & Statistics
CY-2025
TOTAL ARRESTS
TOTAL VIOLENT CRIMES
TOTAL PART I CRIMES
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE
TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD T/C – No Injury 50 38 45 53 186
T/C – w/ Injury 10 5 10 6 31
T/C – Fatality 1 0 0 0 1
Hit & Run – No Injury 11 5 14 16 46
Hit & Run – w/ Injury 0 0 0 1 1
Total Collisions 72 48 69 76 265
TRAFFIC CITATIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Parking 71 100 108 136 415
Traffic / Moving 120 270 144 298 832
Commercial 167 164 195 68 594
Total Citations 358 534 447 502 1,841
TRAFFIC INCIDENTS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD DUI (Arrests/Cites) 6 7 5 2 20
Street Racing (VC 23103) 23 17 22 22 84
CITY OF EASTVALE
Traffic Enforcement Statistics
CY-2025
TOTAL TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
TOTAL TRAFFIC CITATIONS
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.6
June 25, 2025
Approval of Renewal of Cartegraph for Public Works Asset Management Software
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of Cartegraph, Public Works Asset Management Software, in the amount of $48,058.32 for FY25-26 annual subscription.
Summary
Cartegraph is an asset management software that helps municipalities efficiently inventory, manage, and maintain infrastructure assets. These include streets, traffic signals, sidewalks, street lights, curb ramps, gu2ers, landscaped areas, trees, irriga3on systems, traffic and street signs, fleet vehicles, machinery, and equipment.
The City of Eastvale Public Works currently oversees approximately 415 miles of streets, 350 miles of sidewalks, 55 signalized intersec3ons, 1,200 catch basins, 8,212 traffic signs, and 4,418 street lights.
Staff recommends the renewal of Cartegraph to con3nue suppor3ng the City’s efforts to effec3vely manage and maintain these assets. Cartegraph streamlines workflows and supports both infrastructure planning and real-3me field opera3ons. It enables field crews to document work instantaneously, improving communica3on and tracking. By using Cartegraph, the City can enhance overall performance, reduce labor and repair costs, and minimize the volume of service requests from residents.
Background
The City’s Strategic Plan iden3fied the rapid aging of infrastructure and the ongoing maintenance of roadway and street assets as significant challenges. While Eastvale's infrastructure is rela3vely new, 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
123
the City must transi3on to a more data-driven asset management system to ensure efficient investment and to extend the lifespan of its infrastructure.
Cartegraph offers several key benefits, including:
Real-time asset tracking via GIS mapping
Detailed records of asset condition, value, and maintenance history Lifecycle-based budgeting and planning tools to support proactive maintenance Since its ini3al deployment in 2023, Public Works has been using Cartegraph to manage an accurate inventory of City-owned infrastructure and to create and assign work orders efficiently. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of Cartegraph’s annual subscrip3on to continue supporting effective asset management and service delivery.
Cartegraph is a product provided by OpenGov. The City has an exis3ng agreement with OpenGov.
This is a new and separate purchase, but the proposal for Cartegraph incorporates the terms and condi3ons of the exis3ng agreement with OpenGov by reference. A copy of that agreement is attached.
Environmental
No environmental review pursuant to CEQA is required.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 3 Plan for landscape, roads, and street maintenance.
Fiscal Impact
The fiscal year 2025-26 opera3ng budget includes $145,000 for Computer Hardware and SoIware in General Fund account number 100-320-6615.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On June 28, 2023, the City Council approved procurement of Cartegraph for implementa3on and annual subscription.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Quote
Attachment 2 - Original agreement with Opengov
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
124
OpenGov Inc.
660 3rd Street, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94107
United States
Order Form Number: Q-07239 Prepared By: Beverly Dea
Created On: 03/28/2025 Email: [email protected]
Order Form Expiration: 04/25/2025 Contract Term: 12 Months Subscription Start Date: 07/01/2025
Subscription End Date: 06/30/2026
Customer Information:
Customer: City of Eastvale, CA Contact Name: Yurhi Choi Bill To/Ship To: 12363 Limonite Avenue,
Suite 910
Email: [email protected]
Eastvale, California Phone: +1 9517034471
91752
United States
Order Details:
Billing Frequency: Prepaid
Payment Terms: Net 90 Days
SOFTWARE SERVICES:
Product Name Start Date End Date Annual Fee
Asset Management 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $27,893.21
Facilities Domain 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $6,438.85
Signal Domain 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $1,854.85
Stormwater Domain 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $3,709.83
Transportation Domain 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $5,564.67
Walkability Domain 07/01/2025 06/30/2026 $2,596.91
Customer Billing/Service Periods:
Period: Total:
125
07/01/2025 $48,058.32
Order Form Legal Terms:
This Order Form incorporates the OpenGov Master Services Agreement ("MSA") attached here or available at https://opengov.com/terms-of-service/master-services-agreement/.
The "Agreement" between OpenGov and the entity identified above ("Customer") consists of the Order Form, MSA, and, if Professional Services are purchased, the Statement of Work.
Unless otherwise specified above, fees for the Software Services and Professional Services shall be due and payable, in advance, 30 days from receipt of the invoice.
By signing this Agreement, Customer acknowledges that it has reviewed, and agrees to be legally bound by the Agreement. Each party’s acceptance of this Agreement is conditional upon the other’s acceptance of the Agreement to the exclusion of all other terms
City of Eastvale, CA: OpenGov, Inc.
Signature:
____________________________
Signature:
____________________________
Name:
____________________________
Name:
____________________________
Title:
____________________________
Title:
____________________________
Date:
____________________________
Date:
____________________________
126
A- 2022- 009
OPENGOV SOFFWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Software Services Agreement ( this " Agreement") is entered into by OpenGov, Inc., a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 6525 Crown Blvd # 41340, San Jose, CA 95160 (" OpenGov") and the customer listed on the signature block below (" Customer"), as of the date of last signature below ( the " Effective Date"). This Agreement sets forth the terms under which Customer will be permitted to use OpenGov' s hosted software services.
1. DEFINITIONS
Customer Data" means data that is provided by Customer to OpenGov pursuant to this Agreement ( for example, by email or through Customer's software systems of record). Customer Data shall not include any confidential personally identifiable information.
Documentation" means the documentation for the Software Services at the Customer Resource Center page found at https:// opengov. zendesk. com.
Feedback" means suggestions, comments, improvements, ideas, or other feedback or materials regarding the Software Services provided by Customer to OpenGov, including feedback provided through online developer community forums.
Initial Term" means the initial license term specified in number of years on the Order Form, commencing on the Effective Date.
Intellectual Property Rights" means all intellectual property rights including all past, present, and future rights associated with works of authorship, including exclusive exploitation rights, copyrights, and moral rights, trademark and trade name rights and similar rights, trade secret rights, patent rights, and any other proprietary rights in intellectual property of every kind and nature.
Order Form" means OpenGov' s Software Services order form that: ( a) specifies the Software Services provided by OpenGov; ( b) references this Agreement; and ( c) is signed by authorized representatives of both parties.
Renewal Term" means each additional renewal period, which shall be for a period of equal duration as the Initial Term, for which this Agreement is extended pursuant to Section 7.2.
2. SOFTWARE SERVICES, SUPPORT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2. 1 Software Services. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OpenGov will use commercially reasonable efforts to perform the software services identified in the applicable Order Form entered into by OpenGov and Customer (" Software Services").
2. 2 import & Service Levels. Customer support is available by email to support@opengov. com or by using the chat messaging functionality of the Software Services, both of which are available during OpenGov' s standard business hours. Customer may report issues any time. However, OpenGov will address issues during business hours. OpenGov will provide supportfor the Software Services inaccordance withthe Support and Software Service Levels found at https:// opengov. com/service- sla, as long as Customer is entitled to receive support under the applicable Order Form and this Agreement. 2.
3 Professional Servicesa)
If OpenGov orits authorized independent contractors provides professional services to Customer, such as implementation services, then these professional services will be described ina statement of work ("SOW") agreed to by the parties ( the "Professional Services"). Unless otherwise specified inthe SOW, any pre -paid Professional Services Fees must be utilized within one (1) year from the Effective Date. Any unused pre -paid Professional Services Fees shall be forfeited. b)
Unless the SOW provides otherwise, all reasonable travel expenses, pre -approved by Customer and incurred by OpenGov in performing the professional services will be reimbursed by Customer. Travel expenses Rev. 2018. 01_210428NA
127
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
include cost of coach airfare travel round trip from the individual' s location to Customer's location, reasonable hotel accommodations, ground transportation and meals.
3. RESTRICTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
3. 1 Restrictions. Customer may not use the Software Services in any manner or for any purpose other than as expressly permitted by the Agreement. Customer shall not, and shall not permit or enable any third party to: ( a) use or access any of the Software Services to build a competitive product or service; ( b) modify, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or otherwise make any derivative use of the Software Services ( except to the extent applicable laws specifically prohibit such restriction); ( c) sell, license, rent, lease, assign, distribute, display, host, disclose, outsource, copy or otherwise commercially exploit the Software Services; ( d) perform or disclose any benchmarking or performance testing of the Software Services; ( e) remove any proprietary notices included with the Software Services; ( f) use the Software Services in violation of applicable law; or ( g) transfer any confidential personally identifiable information to OpenGov or the Software Services platform.
3. 2 Responsibilities. Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining computers and third party software systems of record ( such as Customer's ERP systems) needed to connect to, access or otherwise use the Software Services. Customer also shall be responsible for: ( a) ensuring that such equipment is compatible with the Software Services, ( b) maintaining the security of such equipment, user accounts, passwords and files, and ( c) all uses of Customer user accounts by any party other than OpenGov.
4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; LICENSE GRANTS; ACCESS TO CUSTOMER DATA
4. 1 Software Services. OpenGov retains all right, title, and interest in the Software Services and all Intellectual Property Rights in the Software Services. The look and feel of the Software Services, including any custom fonts, graphics and button icons, are the property of OpenGov and Customer may not copy, imitate, or use them, in whole or in part, without OpenGov' s prior written consent. Subject to Customer's obligations under this Agreement, OpenGov hereby grants to Customer a non- exclusive, royalty -free license during the Term to use the Software Services.
4.2 Customer Data. Customer retains all right, title, and interest in the Customer Data and all Intellectual Property Rights therein. Customer hereby grants to OpenGov a non- exclusive, royalty -free license to, and permit its partners which include, without limitation the hosting providers of the Software Services) to, use, store, edit and reformat the Customer Data, and to use Customer Data for purposes of sales, marketing, business development, product enhancement, customer service, or for analyzing such data and publicly disclosing such analysis (" Insights"), provided that in all such uses Customer Data is rendered anonymous such that Customer is no longer identifiable.
4. 3 Access to Customer Data. Customer may download the Customer Data from the Software Services at any time during the Term, other than during routine software maintenance periods. OpenGov has no obligation to return Customer Data to Customer.
4.4 Feedback. Customer hereby grants to OpenGov a non- exclusive, royalty -free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to use and incorporate into the Software Services and Documentation Customer's Feedback.
OpenGov will exclusively own any improvements or modifications to the Software Services and Documentation based on or derived from any of Customer' s Feedback including all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the improvements and modifications.
5. CONFIDENTIALITY
5. 1 Each party ( the " Receiving Party") agrees not to disclose any Confidential Information of the other party ( the Disclosing Party") without the Disclosing Party' s prior written consent, except as provided below. The Receiving Party further agrees: ( a) to use and disclose the Confidential Information only in connection with this Agreement; and ( b) to protect such Confidential Information using the measures that Receiving Party employs with respect to its own Confidential Information of a similar nature, but in no event with less than reasonable care. Notwithstanding the above, the Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information to the extent required by law or court order, provided that prior written notice of such required disclosure and an opportunity to oppose or limit disclosure is given to the Disclosing Party.
Rev. 2018. 01 _ 210428NA
128
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
5.2 " Confidential Information" means all confidential business, technical, and financial information of the disclosing party that is marked as " Confidential" or an equivalent designation or that should reasonably be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and/ or the circumstances surrounding the disclosure ( including the terms of the applicable Software Agreement). OpenGov' s Confidential Information includes, without limitation, the software underlying the Software Services and all Documentation.
5.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, " Confidential Information" does not include: ( a) " Public Data," which is data that the Customer has previously released to the public, would be required to release to the public, upon request, according to applicable federal, state, or local public records laws, or Customer requests OpenGov make available to the public in conjunction with the Software Services. Confidential Information does not include ( b) information that has become publicly known through no breach by the receiving party; ( c) information that was rightfully received by the Receiving Party from a third party without restriction on use or disclosure; or (d) information independently developed by the Receiving Party without access to the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information.
6. PAYMENT OF FEES
6. 1 Fees; Invoicing; Payment; Expenses.
a) Fees. The fees for the Software Services for the Initial Term and any Renewal Term (" Software Services Fees") and the fees for Professional Services (" Professional Services Fees") are set forth in the applicable Order Form. Software Services Fees and Professional Services Fees shall hereafter be referred to as "Fees". Except to the extent otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement or in an Order Form, ( i) all obligations to pay Fees are non - cancelable and all payments are non- refundable, ( ii) Customer must pay all Fees due under all Order Forms and SOW within thirty ( 30) days after Customer receives each invoice ( invoices are deemed received when OpenGov emails them to Customer's designated billing contact); ( iii) the Software Service Fee shall be due annually in advance, and ( iv) Customer must make all payments without setoffs, withholdings or deductions of any kind. b) Annual Software Maintenance Price Adjustment. OpenGov shall increase the Fees payable for the Software Services during any Renewal Term by 5% each year of the Renewal Term. c) Invoicing and Payment. OpenGov will invoice the Customer according to the Billing Frequency listed on the Order Form. Customer shall pay all invoices according to the Payment Terms listed on the Order Form. d) Travel Expenses. Unless the SOW provides otherwise, OpenGov will invoice Customer for travel expenses, pre -approved by the Customer, incurred in connection with each SOW as they are incurred. Customer shall pay all such valid invoices within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of invoice. Each invoice shall include receipts for the travel expenses listed on the invoice.
e) Customer Delays; On Hold Fee.
I. On Hold Notice. Excluding delays caused by Force Majeure as described in Section 10. 5, if OpenGov determines that Customer' s personnel or contractors are not completing Customer' s responsibilities described in the applicable SOW timely or accurately, OpenGov shall promptly, but in no event more than thirty ( 30) days from the date of such determination deliver to Customer a notice ( an " On Hold Notice") that A) designates the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer as " On Hold", ( B) detail Customer' s obligations and responsibilities necessary for OpenGov to continue performing the Professional Services, and C) specify the Customer shall be invoiced for lost time in production ( e.g. delayed or lost revenue resulting from rescheduling work on other projects, delay in receiving milestone payments from Customer, equipment, hosting providers and human resources idle) for a fee equal to 10% of the first year Software Service Fee ( the On Hold Fee").
II. Effects of On Hold Notice. Upon issuing an On Hold Notice, OpenGov shall be entitled, without penalty, to ( A) reallocate resources otherwise reserved for the performance of the Professional Services, and B) stop or caused to be stopped the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer until the Customer has fulfilled its obligations as set forth in the On Hold Notice. OpenGov shall remove the "On Hold" status, only upon Customer's fulfillment of its obligations set out in the On Hold Notice, including payment of the On Hold Rev. 2018.01 _ 210428NA
129
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Fee. Upon Customer' s fulfillment of its obligations in the On Hold Notice, OpenGov may, in its sole discretion, extend the timeline to complete certain Professional Services up to six (6) weeks, depending on the availability of qualified team resources ( OpenGov cannot guarantee that these team resources will be the same as those who were working on the project prior to it being placed On Hold). OpenGov shall bear no liability or otherwise be responsible for delays in the provision of the Professional Services occasioned by Customer' s failure to complete Customer' s responsibilities or adhere to a Customer schedule which were brought to the attention of the Customer on a timely basis, unless such delays result, directly or indirectly from the failure of OpenGov or its authorized independent contractors to perform the Professional Services in accordance with this Agreement or applicable SOW.
6. 2 Consequences of Non -Payment. If Customer fails to make any payments required under any Order Form or SOW, then in addition to any other rights OpenGov may have under this Agreement or applicable law, ( a) Customer will owe late interest penalty of 1. 5% of the outstanding balance per month, or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is lower and ( b) If Customer's account remains delinquent ( with respect to payment of a valid invoice) for thirty ( 30) days after receipt of a delinquency notice from OpenGov, which may be provided via email to Customer's designated billing contact, OpenGov may temporarily suspend Customer's access to the Software Service for up to ninety ( 90) days to pursue good faith negotiations before pursuing termination in accordance with Section 7. Customer will continue to incur and owe all applicable Fees irrespective of any such Service suspension based on such Customer delinquency.
6.3 Taxes. All Fees under this Agreement are exclusive of any applicable sales, value- added, use or other taxes Sales Taxes"). Customer is solely responsible for any and all Sales Taxes, not including taxes based solely on OpenGov' s net income. If any Sales Taxes related to the Fees under this Agreement are found at any time to be payable, the amount may be billed by OpenGov to, and shall be paid by, Customer. If Customer fails to pay any Sales Taxes, then Customer will be liable for any related penalties or interest, and will indemnify OpenGov for any liability or expense incurred in connection with such Sales Taxes. In the event Customer or the transactions contemplated by the Agreement are exempt from Sales Taxes, Customer agrees to provide OpenGov, as evidence of such tax exempt status, proper exemption certificates or other documentation acceptable to OpenGov.
7. TERM & TERMINATION
7. 1 Term. Subject to compliance with all terms and conditions, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until the Subscription End Date specified on the Order Form (the "Initial Term") unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 7.3 below.
7. 2 Renewal. This Agreement shall automatically renew for another period of the same duration as the Initial Term the "Renewal Term" and together with the Initial Term, the "Term"), unless either party notifies the other party of its intent not to renew this Agreement in writing no less than thirty ( 30) days before the end of the Initial Term.
7. 3 Termination. Neither party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without a legally valid cause. If either party materially breaches any term of this Agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty ( 30) days after notice by the non -breaching party ( ten ( 10) days in the case of non- payment), the non -breaching party may terminate this Agreement. Additionally, Customer may terminate this Agreement, upon providing at least ninety 90) days notice prior to the annual anniversary date of the Agreement (" Anniversary Date") upon the occurrence of an Event of Nonappropriation as defined below. An " Event of Nonappropriation" occurs when prior to each Anniversary Date: a) Customer uses all efforts that are lawful and within Customer' s official power, to secure the appropriate funds for the next year' s Fees, including indicating the Software Services serve an essential purpose to Customer; and b) Customer has not acquired, used or issued a proposal for similar products or services during this period or has not hired any third party or allowed its own employees to use other services in place of the Software Services. Customer shall permit OpenGov to assist with the efforts in a) above, including providing OpenGov with direct access to Customer's applicable appropriations team.
7. 4 Effect of Termination.
a) In General. Upon termination pursuant to Section 7. 3 or expiration of this Agreement pursuant to Section
7. 1: ( a) Customer shall pay in full for all Software Services and Professional Services performed up to and including the effective date of termination or expiration, ( b) all Software Services provided to Customer hereunder shall Rev. 2018.01 _ 210428 NA
130
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
immediately terminate; and ( c) each party shall return to the other party or, at the other party' s option, destroy all Confidential Information of the other party in its possession. b) Deletion of Customer Data. Unless otherwise requested pursuant to this Section 7. 4( b), upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement the Customer Data, excluding any Insights, shall be deleted pursuant to OpenGov' s standard data deletion and retention practices. Upon written request, Customer may request deletion of Customer Data, excluding any Insights, prior to the date of termination or expiration of this Agreement. Such request must be addressed to " OpenGov Vice President, Customer Success" at OpenGov' s address for notice described at Section 10.
7. 5 Survival. The following sections of this Agreement shall survive termination: Section 5 (Confidentiality), Section 6 ( Payment of Fees), Section 7. 4( b) ( Deletion of Customer Data), Section 8. 3 ( Warranty Disclaimer), Section 9 Limitation of Liability) and Section 10 ( Miscellaneous).
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES; DISCLAIMER
8. 1 By OpenGov.
a) General Warranty. OpenGov represents and warrants that: ( i) it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement; and ( ii) the Professional Services, if any, will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner in accordance with the related statement of work and generally prevailing industry standards. For any breach of the Professional Services warranty, Customer' s exclusive remedy and OpenGov' s entire liability will be the re -performance of the applicable services. If OpenGov is unable to re -perform all such work as warranted, Customer will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient work. Customer must make any claim under the foregoing warranty to OpenGov in writing within ninety ( 90) days of performance of such work in order to receive such warranty remedies.
b) Software Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that for a period of ninety ( 90) days, the Software Services will perform in all material respects in accordance with the Documentation. The foregoing warranty does not apply to any Software Services that have been used in a manner other than as set forth in the Documentation and authorized under this Agreement. OpenGov does not warrant that the Software Services will be uninterrupted or error -free. Any claim submitted under this Section 8. 1( b) must be submitted in writing to OpenGov during the Term. OpenGov' s entire liability for any breach of the foregoing warranty is to repair or replace any nonconforming Software Services so that the affected portion of the Software Services operates as warranted or, if OpenGov is unable to do so, terminate the license for such Software Services and refund the prepaid, unused portion of the Fee for such Software Services.
8.2 By Customer. Customer represents and warrants that (i) it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement; and ( ii) OpenGov' s use of the Customer Data pursuant to this Agreement will not infringe, violate or misappropriate the Intellectual Property Rights of any third party.
8.3 Disclaimer. OPENGOV DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE; NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SOFTWARE SERVICES. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 8, THE SOFTWARE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED " AS IS" AND OPENGOV DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON -INFRINGEMENT.
9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
9. 1 By Type. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS SUPPLIERS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES, REPRESENTATIVES,
CONTRACTORS OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT
MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY: ( A) FOR ERROR OR INTERRUPTION OF USE OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR LOSS OF BUSINESS; ( B) FOR ANY INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; OR ( C) FOR
ANY MATTER BEYOND SUCH PARTY' S REASONABLE CONTROL, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.
Rev. 2018. 01 _ 210428 NA
131
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
9.2 By Amount. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY' S AGGREGATE, CUMULATIVE LIABILITY FOR ANY
CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEES PAID BY
CUSTOMER TO OPENGOV (OR, IN THE CASE OF CUSTOMER, PAYABLE) FOR THE SOFTWARE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY.
9. 3 Limitation of Liability Exclusions. The limitations of liability set forth in Sections 9. 1 and 9.2 above do not apply to, and each party accepts liability to the other for: ( a) claims based on either party' s intentional breach of its obligations set forth in Section 5 ( Confidentiality), ( b) claims arising out of fraud or willful misconduct by either party and ( c) either party' s unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure of the other party' s intellectual property.
9. 4 No Limitation of Liability by Law. Because some jurisdictions do not allow liability or damages to be limited to the extent set forth above, some of the above limitations may not apply to Customer.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
10. 1 Logo Use. OpenGov shall have the right to use and display Customer' s logos and trade names for marketing and promotional purposes in connection with OpenGov' s website and marketing materials, subject to Customer' s trademark usage guidelines provided to OpenGov.
10. 2 Notice. Ordinary day- to- day operational communications may be conducted by email, live chat or telephone communications. However, for notices, including legal notices, required by the Agreement ( in Sections where the word " notice" appears) the parties must communicate more formally in a writing given by personal delivery, by prepaid first- class mail or by overnight courier to the address specified in the most recent Order Form ( or such other address as may be specified in writing in accordance with this Section).
10. 3 Anti -corruption. OpenGov has not offered or provided any bribe, kickback, illegal or improper payment, gift, or thing of value to any Customer personnel in connection with the Agreement, other than reasonable gifts and entertainment provided Customer in the ordinary course of business. If OpenGov become aware of any violation of the above restriction then OpenGov shall promptly notify Customer.
10. 4 Iniunctive Relief. The parties acknowledge that any breach of the confidentiality provisions or the unauthorized use of a party' s intellectual property may result in serious and irreparable injury to the aggrieved party for which damages may not adequately compensate the aggrieved party. The parties agree, therefore, that, in addition to any other remedy that the aggrieved party may have, it shall be entitled to seek equitable injunctive relief without being required to post a bond or other surety or to prove either actual damages or that damages would be an inadequate remedy.
10. 5 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be held responsible or liable for any losses arising out of any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement, other than payment obligations, due to any act of god, act of governmental authority, or due to war, riot, labor difficulty, failure of performance by any third -party service, utilities, or equipment provider, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the party delayed or prevented from performing.
10. 6 Severability; Waiver. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. Any express waiver or failure to exercise promptly any right under this Agreement will not create a continuing waiver or any expectation of non -enforcement. There are no third -party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
10. 7 Assignment. Except as set forth in this Section, neither party shall assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations to a third party without the other party' s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Either party may assign, without such consent but upon written notice, its rights and obligations under this Agreement to: (i) its corporate affiliate; or (ii) any entity that acquires all or substantially all of its capital stock or its assets related to this Agreement, through purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise. Any other attempted assignment shall be void. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind each parry' s permitted assigns and successors.
10. 8 Independent Contractors. No agency, partnership, joint venture, or employment is created as a result of this Agreement and neither party has any authority of any kind to bind the other party in any respect.
Rev. 2018.0i_ 210428NA
132
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
10.9 Attorneys' Fees. In any action or proceeding to enforce rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover costs and attorneys' fees.
10. 10 Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Exclusive jurisdiction for litigation of any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be only in the Federal or State court with competent jurisdiction located in San Mateo County, California, and the parties hereby submit to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.
10. 11 Complete Agreement. This Agreement is the complete and exclusive statement of the mutual understanding of the parties and supersedes and cancels all previous written and oral agreements, communications, and other understandings relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. No modification of this Agreement will be binding, unless in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each party.
SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
Rev. 2018.01_ 210428NA
133
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F41914C. 8AFF-451 F-8892- 2OA61 D59COF2
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Signatures
Customer: i1} OF tdNVQIf
Signature:
Name: flv irJ C1A1GA
Title: tt( ilYlU Ci+ J Manaarx
Date: o I I g' i l 006a
OPENGOV, INC.
Docusigned by:
Signature:
cDa ocD„ wa
Name:
Waranya Simbeck
Title:
Date:
Head of Finance
2/ 1/ 2022
SIGNATURE PAGE TO OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT]
Rev. 2018.01_ 210428NA
134
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Signatures
Customer: ( j-hl OF tQ('walf OPENGOV, INC.
Signature: Signature:
Name: 1 i
NWIR Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Q i I ;) L1 12oaa Date:
SIGNATURE PAGE TO OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT]
Rev. 2018. 01_ 210428NA
135
DowSign Envelope ID: 9F41914C- 8AFF- 451 F- 8892- 2OA61 D59COF2
Q OPENGOV
Created On: 11W.' 022
Quote Expiration: 1512022
Subscription Start Date:
2112022 Subscription End Data:
lOln_ Consumer 027 id'oessidu n
Customer City of Easrvale, CA
Bill Tmgb ip To: 12363 Laterite Avenue, Suite 910
Easnnle, Culd' omu 91752
UnitedSmtus
Order Debris
Billing Frequcaq: Annual
Payment Terms: Na Thaty( 30) Days
SOFIIVARE SERVICES:
Product/ Service
Budgeting E Planning
PROFES SI ONAL S ERVI C ES:
lsmdud/ Serviw
OMGow Daploymcnt
OPMGuV Inc
PO Box 41340
San Jos, CA 95160
Unital State
Prepared 11, Andre Aa io
Email: akercado& pengov cam
Contract Term: W Months
Contact Nnnte: Anwnda Wells Contact Name: Amanda Wills
Email: owellsrdeutvalecagov Email: awells© curvalecs. gov Phone: ( 951) 703-0 38 ( 951) 7034439
Description: See Billing Table Below
Stall Dme End Daze Annual Tenn Annual Face
11112022 151 _ 027 5 S34200. 00
Annual Subscription: 5 41, 200.00
Desorption
Product configuration, setup, and treating described in the anached SOW.
Prefessionei Service Total: 539, 775. 00
pilling T' oble:
Billion Data Amount Due
February I, 2M S73, 975 W fSb/ mnn•.Sensra - PrJaitmrd. R•nurs J February, 1, 2M S34, 2MW
Febntmy 1. 2024 S34, 200W
Fcbwq I,= 5
34, 200.00
February 1, 2026 S34, 2W 00
Order Form Legal Terms
Welcome to OpenG. 0 Thanks fin using our Sail, a Sarvim. This Order Form is entered into between OpouGov, Inc, with its principal place of business at 6525 Crown Blvd n41340 San Jose, CA 951W (" OpenGov'), and you, the entity identified above (- Custrai as of the Effective Date This Oder Fan includes and incorporates the Op inGov Soft.. Smices Agreement (- SSA") atuched, or tf to such SSA is attached. Om SSA aveuable at hops Pialushov comMrns- or-service and the epplauble Sassari of Work SOW') nmrporuW herein m the event Professional Services are purchased. The Orda Form, SSA and SOW' shall hereapc be refined su u tlx' Agrecment'. Unless oOtawae specified above fees for the Software Services and Professional Smicrs shall be due and payable in advance, on the Elfeaive Dote. By signing this Agreement, Custmner acknowledges this it his reviewed and agrees to be legally bound by, the Operi Software Services Agrcemmt Each party s acceptmce of this Agr. t is conditional upon the otha' s acceptance of the Issues in the Agreement to the exclusion of all other terms OP. Gov, ine
D,oeuShuosdbby;
Slimmione
DiJGAO4
Name Wdf' dflyd S7RIbeC
Heald Of Finance
Doe2/ 1/ 2022
136
Q OPENGOV
Created On: I/ 14/ 2022
Quote Expiration: 1/ 312022
Subscription Start Date:
112022 Subscription End Date:
1/ 31/ Customer 2027 Information
Customer: Cny of Eastvale, CA
Bill TotShip To: 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Easbale, Cald' omia 91752
Uniled States
Order Details
Billing Frac uenq: Amoral
Payment Terms: NetThery( 30)Days OpenGew
Inc. PO
Box 41340 San
lost CA 95160 United
States Prepared
By: Andrew kerado Email:
akaado@opmgov emn Can
tract Term: 60 Months ContnctName.
Amanda Wells Contact Name: Amanda Wdls Email: awells@eestvnmgov Email; owells@easmalecagov Phone: ( 951)
703- 4438 ( 951) 7034438 Description: See
Billbrg Table Below SOFTWARE SERVICES:
Product/ Service
Stan Dare End Date Annual Torn Annual Fee Budgeting S
Plarming 2'1
2022 15112M7 5 S34, 2WW An anal
Su bscrip It..: 534,200. 00 PROFESS I
ONA L SERVICES: Pradua/ Semce
Description OpenGov Deployment
Product conegureuon, semp, and aammg described in the attached SOW Professional Services Total: S39,775. 01) Bilbpg Table
Baling Date
Amount Due February 1,
2022 73, 975 W (.1' jnrore. a cer - Y f"suouriserwcrs) February 1, 2W3 34, 2WW February 1,
2024 34, 200A0 February 1,
2025 34. 200. W February I,
2026 S34, 20. 00 Order Fenn
Legal Terms Welcome to
OpenGovl Thanes for using our Software Services This Order Form is ataed into between OpmCmv. Inc., with its principal place of bmnmeas m 6525 Crown Blvd 1340 San Jose, CA 95160 (" OpenGew"), and you, the entity identified above ("Customer'), as of the E fmtive Dam. The: Order Fo i clWm and ercorporates the OpmGov SoRwme Services Agrccman("SSA")amched, or ifo, such SSA is attached, the SSA evadableat https//c engov. coMtmns. of-servire and the applicable Statementof Work SOW') mccepormed herein in the event Professional Services one purchased. The Order Form. SSA and SOW shall hereafter be referred to as the- Agreanmt'. Unless othaw¢ c specified above, fees for the Software Services and Profess. mmi Services sholl be, due and payable, in advance. on the Effective Date. By signesg this Agreement Customer acknowledges that ithas reviewecL and agrees to be legally bound by, the OpmGov Software Services Agreement Each peny's acceptance of this Agreement u conditional upon the other's aaeptame of the turns in the Agreement to the exclusion ofall other terms. OpmGev, In .
Sigrsume. Name.
Date
137
Q OPENGOV
Statement of Work
City of Eastvale, CA
Created by: Ariana Tuckey
Creation Date: 12/ 08/ 21
Document Number: DD- 02229
Version Number: 1
Overview 2
Preamble 2
Methodology 3
Project Initiation 4
Best Practice Review 4
Configuration 4
Validation 4
Deploy 5
Project Completion 5
Project Schedule 5
Roles and Responsibilities 6
Roles and Responsibilities Matrix 6
Governance 8
Regular Communication Components 8
Commitment to Project Direction and Goals 10
Escalation Process 10
Process 10
Escalation Requirements 10
Documentation 11
General Project Commitments 11
Project Scope 12
OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform 12
OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform Project Deliverables 12 t
138
Q OPENGOV
Project Tasks 12
Initiate 12
Best Practices 13
Configuration 13
Validation 14
Deploy 14
OpenGov Budgeting & Planning 15
Budget & Planning Project Deliverables 15
Project Tasks - Budgeting and Planning 15
Initiate 15
Best Practices 17
Configure 17
Validation 19
Deploy 19
Financial Integration 20
Financial Integration Deliverables 20
Financial Integration Tasks 20
Initiate 20
Configuration 21
Validation 21
Deploy 22
Acceptance 22
Acceptance Process 22
Acceptance Requirements 23
Change Management 23
1. Overview
1.1. Preamble
This Statement of Work (" SOW") identifies services that OpenGov, Inc. (" OpenGov" or "we") will perform for City of Eastvale, CA (" Customer" or " you") pursuant to that order for Professional Services entered into between OpenGov and the Customer (" Order Form') which references the Software Services Agreement or other applicable agreement entered into by the parties (the "Agreement').
Customer's use of the Professional Services are governed by the Agreement and not this SOW.
Upon execution of the Order Form or other documentation referencing the SOW, this 2 139
Q OPENGOV
SOW shall be incorporated by reference into the Agreement.
In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the terms and conditions of this SOW and the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this SOW shall govern with respect to the subject matter of this SOW only. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this SOW shall have the meaning defined in the Agreement.
This SOW may not be modified or amended except in a written agreement signed by a duly authorized representative of each party.
openGov will be deployed as is, Customer has access to all functionality available in the current release.
Initiation
I. Masbn Bass Ftac Kaylaw Vag an Be Wa psoJact CemPletbn Bey AAUNdea: L Ing and applkadon of Best
Kay An .: Pracaces, Isaatl - Warkskopa Admin Tralnlnq Key AatMllla> KaY AceMtlez System Kay,%404 CFInal ImroducUom. pmjecl pen Kay Work Product: Document Beaoom C gureaonB W,, Inuse Accemnce, Tramhbn to raAm eataalish charter ChewW4 W. W. gecommendaWn, Data Map. User Acceptance TeWng, Customer Success and plan timelines SOIWon D. rnent Dala Conarmagon, User Kay Wark Praduch: Manager and Technkal Training Pralect Documenbllon suppan, Feedback survey
Kw Wak Produces: Roles
eM mponslGlaiea
CoMlpuntlon
Kay Wa,a Product: Date Kai' VAsh Radp[ 1a: Ngect
tTirMew. protect Plan. Kay Aee Appkanon and S Wlon
Valldalbn, Cuslamer AKeIKance, Trenaitlon
Chade,. nd SN . Ie
Cona9unnion. InNal Date Mlgratlon
Rem,
Key Work Products: SOIWon Conllguratlan, Peer
Kavkw, S Won Document
2. Methodology
OpenGov' s deployment methodology, often referred to as the OpenGov Way (" OG Way'), delivers on OpenGov's mission to power more effective and accountable governments.' It is an innovative, modern, and iterative approach that leads our customers to successfully deploy our products and help them successfully achieve their vision. The OG Way differentiates itself in the market by its foundation of customer empowerment. We rely on our years of experience working with governments, leading in governments, and leveraging best practices from the public and private sector in order to coach our customers through the change management needed to leverage our best practices and quality software. This methodology requires a degree of focus and engagement to ensure collaboration between both parties to produce the desired results in a timely manner. We look forward to our partnership and can't wait to show you how The OG Way will improve the way you do business and theservices you' re able to provide to your citizens! 140
Q OPENGOV
Project Initiation
During project initiation, we will introduce project resources, review the products and services purchased, finalize project timelines, and conduct the kickoff meeting. Both OpenGov and Customer are responsible for assigning their Project Managers for the project. We will hold a planning meeting to review all project documents OpenGov has received to date. We' ll also provide additional worksheets that need to be included. We' ll set- up meetings to finalize the project plan and ensure there is a centralized location for these documents to be stored for collaboration. Lastly, we' ll determine the date for the larger kickoff meeting and discuss the agenda for this critical meeting.
Best Practice Review
OpenGov will provide your team with access to OG University and OpenGov' s Resource Center so that you can start learning.
Provided checklists with samples of data and information that we'll need completed.
We will obtain all data and integration information at this time in our standard format.
We will review your agency -specific documents to validate your business requirements.
We will then coach you on our best practices by showing you how our tool works in the most effective manner.
Based on our best practices review, we'll make solution recommendations based on our domain expertise.
We' ll align with your team based on our understanding of your operating processes based on technical requirements and product functionality.
We' ll review all data and integration requirements. A data map will be mutually agreed upon and signed off on by Customer.
We' ll present a solution document to be mutually agreed upon prior to starting the configuration.
Configuration
We will set- up the base configuration based on the mutually agreed upon solution document.
We will mutually configure the use cases based on the mutually agreed upon solution document.
We will migrate your data based on our mutually agreed upon data map.
Validation
Review the completed work performed during configuration. rd
141
Q OPENGOV
The appropriate members of the Customer project team will confirm that the solution has been configured correctly based on the solution and data mapping documents by testing the use of the solution.
Training will be provided based on the selected package, or as set forth herein.
Any items that were configured or migrated incorrectly based on the data map and solution document will be tracked via an issue log. We will work with your team to identify deployment critical issues that will be worked out prior to launch. If the item is not included in the mutually agreed upon data map and solution document, a mutually agreed upon change order will be discussed as defined in Section 10 Change Management of this SOW.
The exit criteria for this phase is the sign off by the Customer's Project Manager of the configuration based on the mutually agreed upon solution and data map as defined in Section 9 Acceptance of this SOW.
Deploy
The solution is usable by Customer.
Project Completion
Customer is sent a project acceptance form to sign as defined in Section 9 Acceptance of this SOW.
Customer will be asked to respond to a brief survey to provide feedback about the experience.
Customer is introduced to Customer Support and educated on how to engage with customer support based on Customer's procured package.
3. Project Schedule
OpenGov will schedule resources for this project upon signature of the order form. Unless specifically noted, the OpenGov assigned project manager ( as identified below or such alternate designated by OpenGov, the "OpenGov Project Manager") will work with Customer Project Manager to develop the project schedule for all requested deliverables under this SOW. OpenGov reserves the right to adjust the schedule based on the availability of OpenGov resources and/ or Customer resources, and the timeliness of deliverables provided by the Customer.
5 142
Q OPENGOV
4. Roles and Responsibilities
4.1. Roles and Responsibilities Matrix
OpenGov
Role Role Description
Executive Sponsor Responsible for ensuring alignment on project value proposition ES") and vision. Escalation point for Customer Executive Sponsor to mitigate any risks that the project team cannot resolve. Executive Sponsor attends monthly (or other frequency) executive
meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status and closure summary.
Project Manager Responsible for the delivery of the professional services based PM") upon the agreed upon contract and SOW within the budgeted hours and timeframe. Ensures the project is properly forecasted, assigns tasks/ resources, and tracks toward project completion.
Holds executive steering committee meetings and/ or quarterly business reviews as appropriate to ensure project issues are properly escalated and success is achieved. Facilitates the transition to support.
Analyst ("IA") Responsible for helping Customer configure OpenGov' s product suites as assigned. The Analyst is the primary consultant, guiding Customer through configuration working sessions to put together successful workflows.
Subject Matter OpenGov Subject Matter Experts (" SM Es") will engage in Expert (" SME") strategy, design, and execution discussions internally and with Customer during the deployment. The SME has a specific area of expertise, and depending on the scope of the project more than one SME may engage. The SME will not be on all working
sessions, but will be involved per the direction of the OpenGov Project Manager.
Integration Engineer Responsible for migrations, conversions, and integrations as IE") assigned. Responsible for providing clear direction on specifications to ensure proper delivery of migration,
conversions, and integrations. Clear data mapping and data validation to be provided with customer sign -offs obtained by the OpenGov Project Manager.
Account Executive The Account Executive is responsible forthe sales cycle. Aligning E
143
Q OPENGOV
AU) on program vision, value proposition, and contract terms. The Account Executive will facilitate project kickoff along with the OpenGov Project Manager. The Account Executive will be
engaged with the customer throughout theirjourney with
OpenGov, post -deployment and beyond.
Customer Manager The Customer Manager (" CM") is the primary customer CM") relationship holder post -Deploy. The "Air Traffic Controller' or Quarterback" of OpenGov resources with focus on long term success of Customer' s partnership with OpenGov. The CM will engage with Customer to discuss adoption strategy and conduct periodic reviews to ensure Customer's key stakeholders
understand all OpenGov offerings and how they align to key Customer priorities. The CM will be introduced at deployment kick- off, but will not be an active participant in deployment working sessions. As the deployment approaches closure, the CM' s engagement will ramp -up, and the OpenGov Project Manager to CM meeting with Customer will occur prior to Project Completion.
Customer
Role Role Description
Budget Owner ("BO") The Customer Budget Owner commits the funds to the project deployment, assesses the value to the cost (ROI), and approves changes orders. In some cases, the Budget Owner and Executive Sponsor are the same person.
Executive Sponsor Responsible for ensuring Customer team is aligned to core ES") project value proposition and goals. Able to intervene if the project goes off track, and has ability to make decisions on timeline and budget when decisions are stalled. The Executive Sponsor is not expected to regularly attend deployment working sessions. Executive Sponsors, attend monthly ( or other frequency) executive meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status and closure summary.
Project Manager Serves as the primary contact for OpenGov Project Initiation, PM") Best Practice Review, Configuration, Validation, Deploy, Project Completion. Coordinates meetings and schedules. Controls communication between the Customer and OpenGov project
teams.
Project Lead (" PL'') Is an internal SME in the functional area of deployment. Attends working sessions, trainings, and responsible for reviewing 144
Q OPENGOV
configurations. Primary OpenGov counterpart will be the Analyst.
Data and Responsible for mapping out data infrastructure and validating SystemsLead (" DSL") migration, conversion, integration requirements. Someone who is able to connect OpenGov team with any of Customer' s
third -party data sources and vendors as needed to fulfill SOW requirements.
5. Governance
Project Governance provides the foundation and framework to manage deployments by assessing progress and addressing questions and challenges during the course of deployment. OpenGov follows three guiding principles for governance to maximize the deployment value with our customers:
Regular communication aligned to the agreed upon project plan and timing will occur. OpenGov expects our customers to raise questions or concerns as soon as they arise. OpenGov will do the same, as we can only address items when known.
Executive involvement is expected from both OpenGov and Customer. Not only may Executives be called upon to clarify expectations and/ or confusion, but also to steer strategic items to maximize the value through the deployment.
Commitment to the direction outlined in this SOW and critical assessment change orders to ensure they drive value.
5. 1. Regular Communication Components
L
145
Q OPENGOV
Statement Bi- Annually Review of PM, ES, PM, BO.
Committee milestones per AE, CM ES
commercial
agreement, review
budget and fiscal
matters.
Discuss strategic
direction from
deployment,
alignment of
OpenGov with
Customer' s 3- year
roadmap, evaluate
potential shift in
strategy and
impact to
relationship
Executive Sponsor Meeting Monthly / Discuss PM, ES, PM, ES, Bi- Monthly deployment: plus plus
Strategic others as others as
impacts: timing, necessary necessary
scope, process
Value prop
changes,
confusion
Project specific:
items that need
guidance, support
and/ or clarity
Weekly Deployment Updates Weekly Summary of Project Project project actions Team + Team +
against project ES( s) ES( s)
plan.
Risks and
achievements
highlighted in
addition to asks of
leadership.
146
Q OPENGOV
5.2. Commitment to Project Direction and Goals
This SOW is the direction agreed upon by Customer and OpenGov. Transparency of the plan is paramount for our Customers to attain the value the SOW or any subsequent change order outlines.
Should direction of the deployment become disconnected, OpenGov and Customer Project Managers will outline the gaps as they understand them and communicate the gaps to their respective Executive Sponsor( s) ( or Project Teams) for discussion and resolution.
The communication path for this engagement will be outlined in the kick off meeting, documenting both phone numbers and email. The general path is:
OpenGov Project Manager Professional Services Sr. Manager / SVP Executive Sponsor
6. Escalation Process
The purpose of this section is to define the escalation process, should it be needed, to support closing issues that are raised, discussed to move forward with the deployment.
OpenGov and Customer agree to raise concerns and follow the escalation process, resource responsibility, and documentation.
6.1. Process
Identification of an issue impeding deployment progress, outcome or capturing the value proposition, that is not acceptable.
Customer or OpenGov Project Manager summarizes the problem statement and impasse.
Customer and OpenGov Project Managers will outline solution, acceptance or schedule Executive review in accordance with SLA as defined in Section 7 General Project Assumptions.
Resolution will be documented and signed off following Executive review in accordance with SLA as defined in Section 7 General Project Assumptions.
6.2. Escalation Requirements
OpenGov and Customer Project Managers will summarize the impasse and recommendation to present at scheduled or ad hoc executive meetings. Unless otherwise noted in this SOW, Customer Project Manager can approve how hours are used, but not where funding is required.
10 147
Q OPENGOV
Executive Sponsors attend monthly ( or other frequency) executive meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status, and closure summary.
Steering Committees, where applicable, will be the arbitrator to direction and issue closure. Unless otherwise noted in this SOW, the Customer Executive Sponsor must approve change orders that result in additional cost.
Customer or OpenGov Subject Matter Experts may be requested to provide input to the issue and assist in closure. Both Customer and OpenGov will make best effort to enable those Subject Matter Experts to be available and participate.
6.3. Documentation
Issue Escalation: Problem Statement with clear impact to the deployment and/ or engagement.
Acceptance Document: Which will include any change order( s) or other process adjustments required and summary of the resolution.
Notes from Project Meetings, Executive Reviews, and Steering Committee meetings, as appropriate.
7. General Project Commitments
OpenGov is excited to work with Customer on the implementation of our OpenGov ERP Cloud. In order to ensure we are able to meet the project timeline and ensure Customer is successful in this implementation, OpenGov asks that Customer abide by the General Assumptions detailed in this SOW.
This SOW is limited to the Implementation of the OpenGov Cloud as defined in the Project Scope. Any additional services or support will be considered out of scope.
Customer will commit and provide access to all necessary stakeholders and subject matter experts, and other key parties whose roles are defined in Section 4.1, necessary to the successful implementation of the OpenGov ERP Cloud as defined in this SOW.
Customer is responsible for internal change management associated with the purchase of new software.
Response Protocol
OpenGov and Customer commit to responding to inquiries, updates, or any other project -related matters in no more than 10 business days throughout the course of this project. If Customer is delayed in its response, Customer acknowledges that: a) the delay may impact the project schedule; and b) any fees for Professional Services due to OpenGov after such delay shall become due and OpenGov may invoice Customer for such prepayment.
11 148
Q OPENGOV
o As set forth in Section 6.1( e) of the Agreement, if extended delays in Customer responsiveness are encountered, OpenGov may opt to put the project into an " On Hold" status, which includes causing OpenGov to stop or cause to be stopped the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer, until the Customer has fulfilled its obligations set forth in the On Hold Notice as described in the Agreement.
o The Professional Services will be provided during regular business hours ( 8am to 6pm Pacific Time) Monday through Friday ( holidays excluded).
SOW Expiration:
o This SOW is valid for up to 90 days from the Creation Date, or as agreed to in writing by OpenGov and Customer.
8. Project Scope
8.1. OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform
8.1. 1. OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform Project Deliverables
OpenGov Cloud based Reporting & Transparency Platform that includes:
Reporting & . Stories
Transparency • Open Town Hall
Platform • Reporting
Dashboards
Transparency Portal
8.1. 2. Project Tasks
The tasks listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform implementation.
8.1.2.1. Initiate
Provisioning OpenGov will provision Customer's OpenGov entity and verify Customer R& T Platform has access to all purchased modules.
12 149
Q OPENGOV
OpenGov OpenGov will provide access to OpenGov University online training University courses intended to teach users on the basics of the Reporting & Platform Transparency Platform.
Training
Stories and OpenGov will build out an example of a Story:
Open Town • One standard story based on available templates in OpenGov.
Hall Examples OpenGov will build out an example of a topic in Open Town Hall.
Initial Data OpenGov will upload any applicable datasets to the OpenGov Platform.
Migration • Base Budget File
Historical Budget and Transactions Files, including beginning balances
Budget Reference Year data files
OpenGov will accept flat files such as CSV, Text, and/ or Excel
8.1.2.2. Best Practices
8.1.2. 3. Configuration
Chart of OpenGov will review and give feedback on Customer' s general ledger Accounts chart of accounts
OpenGov will provide a functional build of the proposed OpenGov Chart of Accounts, and gain sign off on acceptance from Customer.
OpenGov will configure OpenGov Chart of Accounts in OpenGov system
OpenGov OpenGovwill:
Reports 1 • Setup 3 OpenGov reports ( Annual, Budget to Actuals, and 13 150
Q OPENGOV
Transactions)
8.1. 2. 4. Validation
8. 1.
Des
2.5. Deploy
Training OpenGov will review configured story and train Customer on how to:
Stories Create new stories
Update/ Maintain current stories
Publish internally and externally
Training Open OpenGov will present configured Open Town Hall site and theme.
Town Hall OpenGov will train Customer on Open Town Hall functionality Training OpenGov will review configured OpenGov reports.
OpenGov OpenGov will train Customer on report:
Reports Configuration
Update/ Maintenance
Publishing internally and externally
Training OpenGov will review configured Dashboards
Dashboards OpenGov will train Customer on Dashboard:
Configuration
Update/ Maintenance
Publishing internally and externally
Platform OpenGov will review configured COA and uploaded data.
Training OpenGov will train Customer on Platform maintenance::
Users
Uploading data
Maintaining COA
14 151
Q OPENGOV
Sign Off Customer will sign off that they have:
Configured Story
Configured Open Town Hall
Configured OpenGov reports
Been trained on Stories, Open Town Hall, OpenGov reports
8.2. OpenGov Budgeting & Planning
Budget & Planning Project Deliverables
OpenGov Budgeting & Planning Suite, includes:
Budgeting & • Operating Budget
Planning Suite • Workforce Planning
Capital Improvement Project Budgeting
Online Budget Book
Budget Reporting
8. 2. 2. Project Tasks - Budgeting and Planning
The tasks and responsibilities listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the OpenGov Budgeting and Planning Suite implementation.
8. 2.
Des
2. 1. Initiate
Documentation Customer to provide OpenGov:
Receipt • Budget export
Examples of the documentation currently provided to
department,
Budgetschedule,
Management budget reports example
OpenGov During the initial phase, OpenGov will provide system training to University administrators.
Budget Training will include:
Training . Howtocreate
o a budget
15 152
Q OPENGOV
o a proposal
o a worksheet
o add a line item
o reselect line items
o submit a budget
Reporting overview
Stories overview
Open Town Hall overview
Workforce Planning Overview
Budget and OpenGov will build out examples of best practices for budgeting Workforce solutions:
Solution
Examples Operating
2 budget instances in OpenGov
2 proposals for each budget instance ( Traditional and OpenGov) 3 budget reports
o Operating Budget Development
o Operating Budget Details
o Operating Budget Categories
1 budget story for review
Capital
1 budget instances in OpenGov
2 proposals
3 budget reports
o Capital Budget Development
o Capital Budget Details
o Capital Budget Categories
1 capital story for review
Workforce Planning Shell
4 Standard cost elements
o Wages
o Insurance
Retirement
o Taxes
Online Budget OpenGov will build out:
Book Examples Look and feel of Online Budget Book
Best practice templates for:
o Table of Contents
o Budget message
o Introduction
o Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions
o Budget Summary
16 153
Q OPENGOV
o Departmental Information
o Debt
ices
Functionality W-11on
Overview of OpenGov assesses and identifies how best to configure and map data Best Practice to ensure success based on materials provided by Customer.
Budget and The Implementation Analyst will conduct a review of the examples Workforce created and work with the customer to confirm a budget format on Solution which to move forward.
Online Budget The Implementation Analyst will conduct review of Online Budget Book Book Solution templates and work with Customer to confirm format and approach.
Solution OpenGov will present a solution document to be mutually agreed upon Document prior to beginning configuration.
8. 2. 2. 3. Configure
Base Budget I
OpenGov will configure and upload Customer' s base budgetfile into File OpenGov.
Budget I
Based on the Review and Confirmation phase OpenGov OpenGov will Configuration setup Customer's preferred budget format:
Operating
1 Budgetinstance
2 Proposals ( Department)
Corresponding worksheets (single, fund, division, or function) 1 standard budget Story template
Capital
1 Budget instance
2 Proposals ( Department or Project)
Corresponding worksheets (single, fund, division, or function) I standard capital Story template
Based on the review of the Workforce Planning Shell and with the 17 154
Q OPENGOV
guidance of the Implementation Analyst, Customer will:
Buildout remaining cost elements
Populate position template
Validate Workforce calculation
Budget OpenGov will hold working sessions between the Implementation Configuration Analyst and Customer for the purpose of validating, reviewing, and Working iterating upon draft budget instances. Session will focus on:
Sessions Setup
Structure
Workflow
Useraccess
Administrator OpenGov will provide 1, 60- Minute training sessions to enable Budget Customer's Budget Administrators to manage and maintain their Management OpenGov budgets including:
Training Useraccess
Approval workflow
Cloning
Phases
Proposal status
Dataset and OpenGov will set up 1 export and dataset view to enable budget reports View
Configuration
Budget OpenGov will set up 8 budget reports to include:
Report( s)
Operating
Operating Budget Milestones
Operating Budget Development
Operating Budget Details
Operating Budget Categories
Capital
Capital Budget Development
Capital Budget Details
Capital Budget Categories
Capital Plan Report
Budget OpenGov will provide 1, 60- Minute training sessions to enable Exports and Customer to own, manage and maintain their OpenGov Budget Data Reporting and Reports including:
Training Exports
Dataset views
IN
155
Q OPENGOV
Reports
Online Budget OpenGov will setup 3 OpenGov standard Online Budget Book templates Book chosen from examples defined above, including 1 completed story from Configuration 1 template
and Training Administrator training
Session o One 60- Minute session for training:
Using and Copying Templates
How Datasets and Reports work in Stories
How the Online Budget Book works with
Transparency Portal
Preparing for updating and ongoing use
OpenGov will provide working sessions for OpenGov to consult with Customer on Online Budget Book, scheduled as needed. ( Not to exceed more than 10 sessions unless agreed upon by openGov Project Manager and Customer.)
Customer administrators will set up additional project story shells and corresponding project users, and admins/ users will add content
8. 2.2. 4. Validation
Validation of The OpenGov Project Manager and Analyst will confirm with Configured Customer' s Project Lead that all budget proposals are configured Budgets properly based on the agreed upon format.
19 156
Q OPENGOV
8.3. Financial Integration
8. 3. 1. Financial Integration Deliverables
Financial OpenGov will work with Customer' s IT Staff and Project Team to setup a Integration one way data integration from Springbrook to OpenGov
8. 3. 2. Financial Integration Tasks
The tasks listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the Financial Integrations with OpenGov.
8.3.2.1. Initiate
Functionality Description
Solution OpenGov will review the proposed solution with Customer Review • Functionalities to be Integrated
o Actuals ( Revenue and Expenses)
o Budget
Integration Approach
o Database Connect / Agent Install
o SFTP ( File Transfer)
OpenGov Assumes:
The data will be linked to the Customer's COA.
o Integration is unidirectional from the Customer' s
accounting software into OpenGov.
Data Files Customer will provide the data in the required format associated with SFTP] the functionalities
Data Files for Historical Years
Data Files for Current Year
Automate the file transfers into the OpenGov SFTP location Data Analysis OpenGov will perform the data analysis
To align with the required functionalities
To align with the COA
c
157
Q OPENGOV
8. 3. 2. 2. Configuration
Integration OpenGov will perform the following
Setup • Installation of Agent ( Database Integrations)
Database View Deployment ( Database Integrations)
SFTP Setup (SFTP Data Migrations)
Sample File Format ( SFTP Data Migrations)
OpenGov Assumes:
OpenGov will require assistance from Customer to
understand source system specific customizations and
configurations when building the data extract. When
OpenGov is not able to access or extract data as per
requirements, Customer should provide the data files in CSV format into OpenGov FTP Location.
When the source accounting software is hosted by a third party vendor on behalf of Customer, Customer is
responsible for brokering OpenGov' s access to
Customer' s data residing at the vendor' s premises in
accordance with OpenGov' s data formatting
requirements.
Configuration OpenGov will perform the Configuration to and Testing • Extract, Transform ( when required) and load the data Build Reports for the required functionalities
Initial validation of data
8.3.2.3. Validation
Data Validation I
OpenGov team to work with Customer to
Validate the historical data
Validate the current year data
OpenGov Assumes:
c Customer will provide data to validate against (PDF
Export). Data should be received prior to the start of the integration.
21 158
Q OPENGOV
o OpenGov will perform the validation for data accuracy for the Integration, workingjointly with Customer team to
approve the Financial Integration data.
8.3. Des
2. 4. Deploy
Deployment OpenGov will perform the Configuration to
and Wrap Up Schedule the current year data load
Train the administrators
Monitor the data load
Sign Off Customer will complete OpenGov- provided sign off document acknowledging
Accuracy of the data for historical years and current year associated with the functionalities
Accuracy Reports associated with the functionalities
Adequately trained on the Integration Functionalities
9. Acceptance
9.1. Acceptance Process
All Deliverables require acceptance from the Customer Project Manager( s) following the completion of Deliverables and upon Project Closure. Customer is responsible for conducting any additional review or testing of such Deliverable pursuant to any applicable mutually agreed upon acceptance criteria agreed upon by the parties for such Deliverable.
Upon completion of these phases, the OpenGov Project Manager shall notify the Customer Project Manager( s) and provide the necessary documents for review and sign off.
The following process will be used for accepting or acknowledging Deliverables and Project Closure:
OpenGov shall submit the completed Deliverables to Customer to review or test against the applicable acceptance criteria. Customer shall notify OpenGov promptly of its acceptance or rejection in accordance with the agreed upon acceptance criteria.
22 159
Q OPENGOV
Customer must accept all Deliverables that meet the applicable acceptance criteria.
OpenGov Project Manager will provide the Customer Project Manager with the OpenGov Acceptance form to sign off on the Deliverable and project. Once all Deliverables required to meet a particular phase have been accepted or are deemed accepted, the phase shall be deemed complete.
Upon completion of the phase or project, OpenGov allows Customer 10 business days to communicate that the particular Deliverable(s) does not meet Customer's requirements. Failure to communicate that the particular Deliverable(s) does not meet Customer' s requirements will be deemed as acceptance and any further work provided to remedy Customer' s complaint might incur additional cost.
Customer shall provide to OpenGov a written notice detailing the reasons for rejection and the nature of the failure to meet the acceptance criteria. OpenGov shall make best effort to revise the non -conforming Deliverable(s) to meet the acceptance criteria and re -submit it to Customer for further review and testing.
If the acceptance form is not received in accordance with Section 7 General Project Assumptions, the project phase and/ or project will be considered accepted and automatically closed.
9.2. Acceptance Requirements
All acceptance milestones and associated review periods will be tracked on the project plan.
The Customer Project Manager will have decision authority to approve/reject all project Deliverables, Phase Acceptance and Project Acceptance.
Any open issues shall receive a response in accordance with Section 7 General Assumptions of this SOW following the Validation Acceptance review, or as mutually agreed upon between the parties, for resolution prior to advancing on in the project.
Both OpenGov and Customer recognize that failure to complete tasks and respond to open issues may have a negative impact on the project.
For any tasks not yet complete, OpenGov and/ or Customer will provide sufficient resources to expedite completion of tasks to prevent negatively impacting the project.
10. Change Management
This SOW and related efforts are based on the information provided and gathered by OpenGov. Customer acknowledges that changes to the scope may require additional effort or time, resulting in additional cost. Any change to scope must be agreed to in writing or 23 160
Q OPENGOV
email, by both Customer and OpenGov, and documented as such via a:
Change Order - Work that is added to or deleted from the original scope of this SOW.
Depending on the magnitude of the change, it may or may not alter the original contract amount or completion date and be paid for by Customer. Changes might include:
Timeline for completion
o Sign off process
o Cost of change and Invoice timing
Signed by OpenGov and Customer Executives approving funds.
Change documentation will be mutually agreed upon as defined in Section 7 General Assumptions of this SOW. Should that not occur, the change will be added to the next Executive Sponsor agenda for closure.
Example of changes that might arise during a deployment:
Amending the SOW to correct an error.
Extension of work as the complexity identified exceeds what was expected by Customer or OpenGov.
Change in type of OpenGov resources to support the SOW. 24 161
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.7
June 25, 2025
Purchase of One Skid Steer Loader for Use by City of Eastvale Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the purchase of one (1) Caterpillar (CAT) 262D3 Skid Steer Loader in Fiscal Year 2025- 26 and attachments in an amount not to exceed $124,807.99; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents including a purchase order to complete the purchase.
Summary
The proposed fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 budget includes Air Quality Management District (AQMD) funding for the purchase of a CAT 262D3 skid steer loader to support Public Works opera;ons and strengthen the City’s emergency response capabili;es. This purchase aligns with the Public Works Department long-term strategy to reduce reliance on contracted services by bringing roadway repair and related maintenance activities in-house.
The skid steer loader is a versa;le, mul;purpose machine essen;al for maintaining roadways, sidewalks, gu>ers, curbs, storm drains, and other public right-of-way (ROW) areas. With a variety of compa;ble a>achments, it enables the City to perform essen;al tasks such as asphalt and concrete grinding, debris sweeping, vegeta;on removal, and site prepara;on to be completed efficiently with a single piece of equipment.
This investment will greatly improve the City’s responsiveness to community needs—such as 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
162
addressing tripping hazards, clearing debris, and mi;ga;ng wildfire risks by removing brush and weeds from public areas. As the City’s infrastructure con;nues to age, bringing more services inhouse will allow the Public Works Department to address maintenance needs more cost-effec;vely and be>er prepared for long-term growth by internalizing these opera;ons. In addi;on to suppor;ng core Public Works func;ons, this machine will also support other departments, such as the City's Community Services & Recrea;on Department in preparing for annual events. Overall, the addi;on of this equipment will increase opera;onal flexibility, improve service delivery, and reduce long-term contracting costs across multiple service areas.
Background
As part of the proposed FY 2025-26 Budget, the Public Works Department is recommending the purchase of a new CAT 262D3 skid steer loaded to support roadway maintenance, emergency response, and general ROW opera;ons. The equipment would be procured through a Sourcewell approved vendor, in an amount not to exceed $124,807.99 (Attachment 1).
The CAT 262D3 skid steer loader is powered by a Tier 4 Final diesel engine—the cleanest available technology in its class. This purchase complies with AB 2766 funding criteria, which allow for the acquisi;on of new, higher-emission off-road diesel equipment with cleaner technology, in alignment with the programs guidelines.
The equipment will be procured using Sourcewell, a coopera;ve purchasing program. In accordance with Eastvale Municipal Code Sec;on 4.06.080(d), purchases made through an approved cooperative purchasing agreement are exempt from the City’s competitive bidding requirements.
Environmental
The purchase of this equipment is not defined as a Project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no environmental review is required.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: A | Goal #: N/A This purchase supports the City’s strategic goals related to infrastructure maintenance and public safety by expanding the Public Works Department’s ability to perform in-house maintenance, respond to hazards, and improve service delivery.
Fiscal Impact
The total fiscal impact for the proposed purchase of the CAT 262D3 skid steer loaded is not to exceed $124,807.99. Staff has received confirma;on of approval for use of AQMD annual funding for the clean diesel equipment purchase. Funding for the purchase is included in the proposed FY 2025-26 budget; assuming approval of the fiscal year 2025-26 budget, sufficient funds will be available in the AQMD Fund other capital outlay account 220-500-6695. Ongoing opera;onal costs will be covered by the General Fund under the Vehicle Operations/Gas Account 100-510-6330.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - CAT 262D3 Quote (New).pdf
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
163
Quote 185253-01
185253-01
Apr 15, 2025
Caterpillar Sourcewell Contract Number: 011723-CAT Eastvale Sourcewell Account Number: City of Eastvale (69733)
Hello
We would like to thank you for your interest in our company and our products, and are pleased to quote the following for your consideration.
One (1) New Caterpillar Inc. Model: 262D3 Skid Steer Loader including standard and optional equipment as listed below.
STOCK NUMBER: NS0024665 SERIAL NUMBER: 0TP404684 YEAR: 2025 SMU: 3 We wish to thank you for the opportunity of quoting on your equipment needs. This quotation is valid for 30 days, after which time we reserve the right to re-quote. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Joseph Munoz
Machine Sales Representative
164
Quote 185253-01
One (1) New Caterpillar Inc. Model: 262D3 Skid Steer Loader including standard and optional equipment as listed below.
Standard Equipment
POWERTRAIN
Cat C3.3B diesel engine Filters, canister type, fuel
-Gross horsepower per SAE J1349 and water separator
74.3 hp (55.4 kW) @ 2400 RPM Radiator / hydraulic oil
-Electric fuel priming pump cooler (side-by-side)
-Glow plugs starting aid Spring applied, hydraulically released, -Liquid cooled, direct injection parking brakes
Air cleaner, dual element, radial seal Hydrostatic transmission S-O-S sampling valve, hydraulic oil Four wheel chain drive Filter, cartridge type, hydraulic
HYDRAULICS
ISO or H pattern controls: Electro/hydraulic hydrostatic Electro/hydraulic implement control transmission control
ELECTRICAL
12 volt electrical system -Gauge backlighting
80 ampere alternator -Two rear tail lights
Ignition key start/stop/aux switch -Dome light
Lights: Backup alarm
-LED work lights (2 front, 2 rear) Electrical outlet, beacon
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT
Operator warning system indicators: leaves seat or armrest raised:
-Air filter restriction -Hydraulic system disables
-Alternator output -Hydrostatic transmission disables
-Armrest raised/operator out of seat -Parking brake engages -Engine coolant temperature ROPS cab, open, tilt up
-Engine oil pressure Anti-theft security system w/6-button -Glow plug activation keypad
-Hydraulic filter restriction FOPS, level I
-Hydraulic oil temperature Top and rear windows
-Park brake engages Floormat
-Engine emission system Interior rear view mirror
Gauges: fuel level and hour meter USB charging port
Storage compartment with netting Horn
Ergonomic contoured armrest Hand (dial) throttle, electronic Control interlock system, when operator
FRAMES
Lift linkage, vertical path Belly pan cleanout
Chassis, one piece welded Support, lift arm
Machine tie down points (6) Rear bumper, welded
165
Quote 185253-01
OTHER STANDARD EQUIPMENT
Engine enclosure - lockable Heavy duty flat faced quick disconnects Extended life antifreeze (-37C, -34F) with integrated pressure release Work tool coupler Split D-ring to route work tool hoses Hydraulic oil level sight gauge along side of left lift arm Radiator coolant level sight gauge Variable speed hydraulic cooling fan Radiator expansion bottle Per SAE J818-2007 and EN 474-3:2006 and Cat ToughGuard TM hose ISO 14397-1:2007
MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS
262D3 SSL DCA6B 642-0827
262D3 SKID STEER LOADER 512-4262
CAB PACKAGE, ULTRA 588-9091
HYDRAULICS, PERFORMANCE, (H3) 512-4319
CONTROL, ISO, PROP, WT 512-4115
POWERTRAIN, TWO SPEED 512-4178
LIGHTS, LED 495-1671
ROPS, ENCLOSED WITH A/C (C3) 512-4195
DISPLAY, ADVANCED, LCD, CAMERA 416-9265
FAN, COOLING, DEMAND 486-6957
QUICK COUPLER, HYDRAULIC 512-3404
SEAT,AIR SUSPENSION,CLOTH,HEAT 536-9738
FILM,TWO SPEED W/HIGH FLOW XPS 568-4704
STANDARD RADIO(12V),BLUETOOTH 345-6180
RIDE CONTROL 556-5899
BATTERY,EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, DISC 568-5603
REAR LIGHTS 356-6082
DOOR, CAB, POLYCARBONATE 539-8061
SEAT BELT, 2'' 542-6994
CERTIFICATION ARR, P65 563-1163
HEATER, ENGINE COOLANT, 120V 345-3556
COUNTERWEIGHT,MACHINE,EXTERNAL 345-5148
LANE 1 ORDER 0P-9001
PRODUCT LINK, CELLULAR PL243 641-1758
TIRES, 12/16.5 CAT 10PR 185-8667
INSTRUCTIONS, ANSI, USA 512-3741
SERIALIZED TECHNICAL MEDIA KIT 421-8926
FILM, SELF LEVEL, ANSI 435-9238
FILM, RIDE CONTROL, ANSI 422-3445
SHIPPING/STORAGE PROTECTION 0P-2266
PACK, DOMESTIC TRUCK 0P-0210
CAROLINA CDC - - AVAILABILITY 0P-1176
BUCKET-GP, 62'', BOCE 279-5365
HAMMER, B6 532-9106
BRACKET, LINES, SSL, MD-LG 532-9240
KIT, WATER TANK, 44 US GAL 571-6876
COLD PLANER, PC306 529-5790
KIT, WATER SPRAY, PCX06/8 231-2591
166
Quote 185253-01
WARRANTY & COVERAGE
Standard Warranty: 24 MONTHS / 2,000 HOURS FULL MACHINE Extended Coverage: 262-48 MO/2000 HR PREMIER
CSA 24 MO / 1,000 HR PARTS ONLY + VISIONLINK CONNECT - CFAS CVA SELL PRICE $115,831.08
EXT WARRANTY Included
CSA Included
NET BALANCE DUE $115,831.08
SALES TAX (7.75%) $8,976.91
AFTER TAX BALANCE $124,807.99
Accepted by___________________________________ on ____________________ ______________________________
Signature
167
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.8
June 25, 2025
Adop-on of an Ordinance Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading and adopt the Ordinance, en!tled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014; June 24, 2015; July 11, 2018; January 26, 2022; and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
Segment 2: 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue Segment 23: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road Segment 28: Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way Segment 32: Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel Segment 33: Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue Segment 46: Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of appropriate and safe travel speeds, and to protect the general public from the risks posed by reckless or unpredictable driving behavior. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
168
Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads.
Speed limits are not based on the ac!ons of few. In California, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be set using an Engineering and Traffic Survey (ETS), rather than through arbitrary methods. This approach ensures that speed limits are defensible and appropriate for the roadway conditions. The CVC also includes the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350), which states:
“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Properly posted speed limits assist law enforcement in citing drivers who violate the Basic Speed Law and give drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
The engineering and traffic survey study involves the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sec!on 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edi!on, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
The City Council last adopted an Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
Segment 2: 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue Segment 23: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road Segment 28: Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way Segment 32: Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel Segment 33: Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue Segment 46: Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road These segments were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way - Segment 28 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
169
Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel - Segment 32 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue - Segment 33
2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue - Segment 2 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road - Segment 23 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road - Segment 46 Segment No Street Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit (mph)
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue
and
Sumner Avenue
40 40
23 Hamner Ave
Bellegrave Avenue
and
Cantu Galleano
Ranch Rd
50 45
28 Harrison Avenue
Limonite Avenue
and
Blossom Way
45 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to
Cucamonga Creek
Channel
(New)
None 45
33 Limonite Avenue
Cucamonga Creek
Channel
to Archibald
Avenue
(New)
None 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street &
Schleisman
Road
35 35
The recommended speed limits were reviewed and found acceptable by the Riverside County Sheriff's Office, which provides contract law enforcement services to the City of Eastvale.
To ensure enforceability, each speed limit recommenda!on must be supported by an ETS that can withstand legal scru!ny. This survey includes all required documenta!on under State law. Once the ordinance is adopted, updates to posted speed limits will be implemented accordingly.
Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 7 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
170
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addi!onal speed limit signs need to be installed at various loca!ons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is es!mated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2025 Speed Survey Amendment Phase 1
Attachment 2 - Ordinance
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
171
2025
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
(Draft)
Adopted on __________ by Ordinance 25-__
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 23-13
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 22-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 2018-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 15-04
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July 24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10
Approved By:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650
Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra Group, Inc.
172
173
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3
3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9
4.0 Roadway Segment Field Review 11
4.1 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12
4.2 Factors That May Be Considered 12
4.3 Recommended Speed Limits 12
4.4 Speed Limit Signing 13
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14
5.1 Summary and Conclusions
5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance 14
APPENDIX
APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Table
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
174
175
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for six (6) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.
The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.
The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.
This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied, that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified, and that the provisions of AB 43 have been incorporated in the analysis. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022, while other sections went into effect on January 1, 2023. All sections are currently in effect. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, which took effect on January 1, 2023, when Revision 8 of the CA MUTCD was approved, and on April 1, 2025, when Revision 9 of the CA MUTCD was approved.
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 City Council approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
176
Introduction
2 2 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 23 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road 28 Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 32 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel33 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue 46 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road The segments below were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way – Segment 28 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel – Segment 32 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue – Segment 33
2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue – Segment 2 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 23 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road – Segment 46 This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the six (6) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.
At six (6) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the 2025 CA MUTCD 2014, rev 9. Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E. 177
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
The engineering and traffic survey study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, passed in 2021, introduced concepts from Vision Zero into the determination of speed limits. AB 1938, passed in 2022, made further modifications. The goal of Vision Zero is to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries to zero, based on the Safe System Approach. The basic tenet of Vision Zero is that human beings are vulnerable to traffic collisions, the severity of injuries and death are directly affected by speed, and roadway speeds should be reduced wherever possible, using the Safe System Approach, to achieve Vision Zero. AB 43 maintains the use of the 85th percentile speed as the base for setting speed limits, but makes it easier to reduce speed limits. The effects of AB 43 are discussed below, under Analysis. 178
Study Methodology
4 Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for six (6) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.
Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 (two years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.
Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.
Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:
Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.
Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.
The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:
A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.
AB 43 also allows the speed limits as determined above, to be reduced an additional 5 mph or the existing speed limits to be maintained under certain conditions. If a local authority, after 179
Study Methodology
5 completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance:
Reduce the speed limit by an additional five miles per hour on a section of highway designated as a Safety Corridor or if the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. Retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
Determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Crash Data on California State Highways (Road Miles, Travel, Crashes, Crash Rates) published by Caltrans. The latest edition, 2022, was used for this 2025 analysis.
The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:
Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years Where: Number of midblock collisions based on 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.
180
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0
SURVEY RESULTS
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey
Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.
The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.
Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the six (6) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
Posted speed limit
Direction of survey
Date and time of speed survey
Weather conditions
Number of vehicles observed in each direction
Speed of each surveyed vehicle
15th percentile speed
50th Percentile speed
85th Percentile speed
10 mph pace speed
Percent over pace speed
Percent in pace speed
Percent under pace speed
Average speed
The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 181
7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(Amended April 2025)
No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 40 40 No Change - 85th%ile 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street
N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decreased - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S 50 48 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the north. 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue2 N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way2 N/S 45 40 35 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b) 29 30
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Ch. NE/SW None3 52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 33 Cucamonga Creek Ch to Archibald Avenue NE/SW None3
52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 34 35
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage, no bike lanes
(Continued on Next Page)
182
8 No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I15)E/W None 59 55 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduced - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 43 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2, CVC 22358.7. 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None 43 40 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1Roadway segments studied for 2025 E&TS are highlighted in gray. 2 Segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Rd & Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Ave since the character of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave. 3Two segments, currently studied (Nos. 32 & 33), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 4See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA laws, AB 43 & AB 1938. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 183
9 Survey Results
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis
The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.
Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”
It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.
The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.
Example:
Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 106
Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road:
Collision Rate = 3 x 106
25,139 x 365 x 0.83 x 2
= 0.20 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)
The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2022 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the six (6) segments studied in the 2025 analysis, and are shown in the table below.
No. Street Between Lane Type
Statewide
Collision
Rate1
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 20 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 6 lanes, divided 1.17 26 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 2 lanes, undivided 1.24 32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 4 lanes, divided 1.17 33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 4 lanes, divided 1.17 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 1 Statewide Collision Rates listed are averages for Suburban (Rural Inside City + Urban Outside City) roads. 184
10 Table 2: Collision Analysis
(Amended April 2025)
No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 6,155 0 0.00 1.24 No 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3,755 1 0.24 0.93 No 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20,934 7 0.19 1.29 No 9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2,497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3,828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 1.16 No 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No 23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 25,139 3 0.20 1.17 No 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 1.05 No 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 1.83 No 26 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 0.21 1,100 3,015 0 0.00 1.24 No 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No 31 Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No (Continued on Next Page)
185
11 No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel (New) 0.60 3,150 14,735 1 0.16 1.17 No 33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue (New) 0.56 2,950 15.549 0 0.00 1.17 No 34 Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 1.17 No 35 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 1.17 No 36 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7,806 4 0.62 1.32 No 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 1.32 No 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 6,389 0 0.00 1.24 No 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4,721 0 0.00 0.91 No 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6,678 1 0.20 1.60 No 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 Newly-surveyed roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 2-year period for newly surveyed segments and 3-year period for prior segments. 3 Col/MVM = Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 4 The previous survey on Harrison Avenue (Segment 27) included the segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Avenue. The latest surveyed segment (Segment 28) includes Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way since, the portion of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave, the previously-surveyed segment, in width and traffic volume..
186
12 Survey Results
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.
The roadway segments were driven and videorecorded by Mr. Alan Perkins, Senior Engineering Technician, and reviewed by Ruth Smith, Senior Traffic Engineer (contracted through Ardurra Group).
The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were noted in the study on the Strip Maps, found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and Section 22358.6(b).
The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
Collision History
Collision Rate
Average Daily Traffic Volume
Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations Factors Indicating Land or Facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, including the presence of sidewalks, bikeways, crosswalks, schools, parks, employment centers, retail, senior centers, cultural areas, religious facilities, health/medical facilities and transit stops
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways Adjacent Land Uses
187
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 SECTION 4.0
SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Factors That May Be Considered
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.
The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered. Most recent collision record (mid-block)
Roadway characteristics
Shoulder condition
Grade
Alignment
Sight Distance
Roadside development and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity
Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Residential density
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
4.2 Recommended Speed Limits
The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 188
Survey Findings and Recommendations
14 4.3 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.
It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.
Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.
Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested. 189
Summary and Conclusions
15 SECTION 5.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Summary and Conclusions
1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 9, Section 2B.13.
2. Daily traffic counts for six (6) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2025 on March 25.
3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.
4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.
5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on four (4) of the six (6) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed or established, as listed below.
Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
23 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & CantuGalleano Ranch Road 50 45 Reducing speed limit by 5 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
28 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue & Blossom
Way 45 35 Reducing speed limit
by 10 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue &
Cucamonga Creek Channel
(new street segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)
33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel &
Archibald Avenue (new street
segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)
5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance
Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as provided on the following pages.
190
191
APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated April 2025)
192
193
1 Appendix A
RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific two-year interval of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.
In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:
If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.
If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.
Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 194
2 Appendix A
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.
Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.
The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar or lidar enforcement.
APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 195
3 Appendix A
40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) Downward Speed Zoning Exceptions
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Initial Rounding to Nearest Five MPH
22358.6 (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.
Note: Section 22358.6 was modified by Assembly Bill 1938, and the modifications became effective on January 1, 2023.
Additional Five MPH Reduction
22358.7 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine 196
4 Appendix A
and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. Note: Revision 8 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2014 Edition, effective on January 26, 2023, includes the provisions of this section, making them currently effective.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.7 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.
Maintaining Existing Speed Limit
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 197
5 Appendix A
1, 2022, then was amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.
Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit
22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.
Speed Trap 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
198
6 Appendix A
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning and became effective on January 1, 2022.):
(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
199
7 Appendix A
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone, business activity district or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business 200
8 Appendix A
activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then modified by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.) Speed Trap Evidence
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c)When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of 201
9 Appendix A
separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
(c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
202
10 Appendix A
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
203
11 Appendix A
1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For the purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transporatation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the grant funding, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
State Highways within Local Jurisdictions
22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.) 22354.5 (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular 204
12 Appendix A
portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the speed limit.
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
205
APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated April 2025)
206
207
17 Appendix B
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated April 2025)
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates.
Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.
The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a 208
18 Appendix B
particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.
CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).
Option:
1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c). 3.
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC 209
19 Appendix B
Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85thpercentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).
Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7. 12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).
Support:
12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.
CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.
Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways.
12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.
Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State 210
20 Appendix B
Highway System
12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.
Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:
1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.
2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more of the required crash weighting factors listed in the Table 2B-105(CA) shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.
Option:
12p Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).
Standard:
12q The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:
1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.
2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.
3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12r Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.
Guidance:
12s A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.
Option:
12t For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. 12u To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.
Standard:
211
21 Appendix B
12v A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.
Option:
12w Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12x Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.
Option:
12y Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).
Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).
Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet. Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet. Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.
Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.
CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.
Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
212
22 Appendix B
CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:
1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.
2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.
3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:
4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. 7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.
Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c). 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are 213
23 Appendix B
traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.
If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 214
24 Appendix B
vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.
B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that 215
25 Appendix B
conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.
Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.
Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.
Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed 216
26 Appendix B
approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.
Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.
Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
217
27 Appendix B
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.
Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed 218
28 Appendix B
limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.
Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.
Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Support:
219
29 Appendix B
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.
Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
220
30 Appendix B
b. The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
c. Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
b. A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.
Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352. 96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).
Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are 221
31 Appendix B
met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.
Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.
An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
105 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.
Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.
Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 222
32 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 223
33 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 224
34 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 225
35 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 226
36 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 227
37 Appendix B
Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD
Text Headings
Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.
Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.
Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.
The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.
Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.
Words and Phrases
Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed—the summation of the instantaneous or spot-measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.
Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85thpercentile speeds. (e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
228
38 Appendix B
Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.
Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.
Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)—the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.
Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.
Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.
CVC – California Vehicle Code.
Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.
Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.
Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.
Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 229
39 Appendix B
exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.
Engineering Study—the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.
Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.
Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.
Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).
Pedestrian Facilities—a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.
Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.
Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared-use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
230
40 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.
Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.
Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
231
APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated April 2025)
232
233
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586
0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
234
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 2
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
Speed Limit Recommendation
40 mph
No Change, same as existing
85th percentile speed
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Heavy pedestrian & vehicular traffic during school. Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and bike traffic.
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane, Divided. Straight alignment. bike lanes, but substandard.
Comments:
Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary at Harrison Ave.
Residences do not front on 65th St. - no direct access.
Residential
38 - 47 mph
40 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted median
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
46 65th Street
Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
6,155
Appendix C
235
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
Appendix C
236
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642
0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
237
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260
1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
238
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
239
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700
1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
240
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580
1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
241
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010
1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
242
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030
0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Cul-de-sac near River Road.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
243
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650
1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.
Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
244
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575
0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
245
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
246
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.18
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323
0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
Appendix C
247
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075
1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
248
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.14
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.
Comments:
Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.
Appendix C
249
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.39
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626
0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
Appendix C
250
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curves.
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
251
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600
0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved
.'-vk
and
Vl-1
Authorized
Qn-::
for release by City Traffic
7 Engineer*:
/Jo/Zo,ei t �I ,_ �11
. •'
* Contract
Ruth Smith,
services
TE,
provided
PTP
by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date �,,,�� 0, � Segment #19
Appendix C
252
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295
0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
253
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
254
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800
0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway width reductions.
Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
255
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 23
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Ave & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
North/South
Traffic Data
25,139
4,400
0.83 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Commercial, Residential and Industrial
38 - 47 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
5-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.
Comments:
Residences do not front onto Hamner Avenue - no direct access.
Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Matches segments to the south.
Appendix C
256
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*: � �� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;! Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date J}
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 Appendix C
257
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved
�Wl
and Authorized
µtfor release by City Traffic Engineer*: �
1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
* Contract
Ruth Smith,
services
TE,
provided
PTP
by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date � Segment#25
Appendix C
258
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
259
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080
1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
260
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
40 Harrison Ave
Limonite Avenue & Blossom Way
North/South
Traffic Data
3,015
1,100
0.21 1 Lane in Each Direction
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Residential
30 - 39 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. On-street parking on West side, small park, Roadway Geometrics:
2-Lane, undivided. Straight alignment.
Comments:
Residences do not front onto Harrison Avenue - no direct access.
Speed Limit Recommendation
35 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b)
Appendix C
261
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100
0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
262
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120
1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
263
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 31
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070
0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
264
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
15,549
6,100
1.16 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
44 - 53 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.08
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. 1-Lane Roundabout west of Archibald Ave. Curved alignment Comments:
This is a new street segment that was not previously studied.
Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1, Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, CVC22358.6(b).
Appendix C
265
Engineering Traffic Survey Summary
Location:
Between:
Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed (mph):
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
4/22/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Ave
Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Ave
E/W
Traffic Data
15,549
2,950
0.56 4 lanes, divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
42 - 51 mph
None
Collision History
1/1/2023 - 12/31/2024
0 0.00
1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Recommendation
50 Established
Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b), segment is "S" curve ending at flood control channel.
Appendix C
266
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:
Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.
Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•: C ;i,- 1Y
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. H!lt:t s
7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (,
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment# Appendix C
267
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I 6'�) I ll:IO �)!,
1. * Contract
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
services provided by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date �,�� # Segment#
Appendix C
268
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.
Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
Appendix C
269
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
270
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380
0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
271
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970
0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.
Agricultural land west of Hall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
272
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500
0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
273
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:
Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.
Comments:
Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved
'--t,,t,_ 11---
and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*: � j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1 I. ;; Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group �� Segment# Appendix C
274
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
275
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
276
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
277
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040
0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
278
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location:
Between:
Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit (mph):
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed Limit:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation Based On:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No Change
85th percentile speed, Option 2, CVC 22358.7.
School / Residential
34 - 43 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes, painted shoulders between Orange and Baltimore.
Comments:
High School, intermediate school, elementary school, & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.
Residences do not front onto Scholar Way - no direct access. 43 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
North/South
Traffic Data
6,389
3,300
0.63 2 Lanes in Each Direction with 2-Way Left Turn Lane, partial painted median Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Undivided. Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Appendix C
279
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
280
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700
0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.
Roadway Geometrics:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
281
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 49
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935
1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
282
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 50
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422
1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
283
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 51
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542
0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.
Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
284
285
APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated April 2025)
286
287
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE
0.49 mi
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET
UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North SCHOLAR WAY JAMESTOWN AVENUE HAMNER AVENUE • 35 MPH Appendix D
288
Appendix D
289
Appendix D
290
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)
0.31 mi
RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North 35 MPH • HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST • 35 MPH Appendix D
291
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North SUMNER AVENUE SCHOLAR WAY HAMNER AVENUE 68TH STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
Appendix D
292
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET
0.5 mi
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST I-15 INTERSTATE HWY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •
WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
Appendix D
293
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET
1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
RIVER STREET
ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
RIVER RD
WIND
BARON
ROAD
BLUFF
GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD
55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
Appendix D
294
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD WIND RIVER RD
GRAPEWIN
STREET
CHANDLER STREET
FIELDMASTER
STREET
SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK EASTVALE
PKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
295
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North INDUSTRIAL
ARCHI BALD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
50 MPH • 50 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
Appendix D
296
Appendix D
297
Appendix D
298
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT
0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •
CITY LIMIT BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL INTERSTATE HWY
CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
299
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BLOSSOM WAY
HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.5 mi
BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE CEDAR CREEK ROAD SUMNER AVENUE 30 MPH • • 30 MPH
REDSIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 30 MPH • PINE GROVE PL
Appendix D
300
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.
HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY
.50 mi
CANTU-GALLEANO
RANCH RD.
COMMERCIAL
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< LIMIT (I-15) HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL GOODMAN RD. &IT< LIMIT
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH Appendix D
301
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HELLMAN AVENUE ARCHIBALD AVENUE HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE
1.53 mi
RESIDENTIAL • 45 MPH
SELBY AVENUE
SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
302
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY
0
PL SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL HIGH SCHOOL
PARK • 40 MPH COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE COBBLE CREEK DRIVE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Appendix D
303
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL ವ MP+ SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) ವ MP+ HIGH SCHOOL
RESIDENTIAL
PARK MAYFIELD STREET CARROLLTON PLACE
Appendix D
304
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
FIELDMASTER STREET
HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi
RESIDENTIAL
FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
E
K
RD
C
H
E
R
R
Y
MEADOW
BROOK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK
HALL RD
ARCHIBALD AVE
Appendix D
305
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Goodman Way
Street Segment: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road to Hamner Avenue Segment Length (MI): 0.68 mi
North
GOODMAN WAY
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
• 35 MPH
35 MPH•
35 MPH•
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
306
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NorthRIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
FAIR GROUNDS
PARK RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
307
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 65TH STREET 45 MPH • 45 MPH • 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
308
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER
HAMNER AVENUE
0.91 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH
SWAN LAKE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
• 45 MPH
AVENUE
45 MPH •
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
309
Appendix D
310
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: HAMNER AVENUE
Street Segment: CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD & RIVERSIDE DRIVE Segment Length (MI): 1.23 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF ONTARIO
CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
VACANT
LAND
UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
311
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Hamner Avenue
Street Segment: Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street Segment Length (MI): 0.99 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
HAMNER AVENUE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SR 60 FREWAY
MISSION BLVD
UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF ONTARIO
CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL
PHILADELPHIA AVENUE
Appendix D
312
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI): CHANDLER STREET
North
HARRISON AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH
NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
313
Appendix D
314
Appendix D
315
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD TO
0.97 mi
CONSERVATION
AREA
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMITS
RIVER ROAD
CHANDLER STREET
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1) 50 MPH •
UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED
CHANDLER STREET
Appendix D
316
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMIT
CHANDLER STREET
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
UNDEVELOPED 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • 50 MPH •
SCHOOL
WALTERS STREET ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKETSTREET
PINE AVENUE PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD LANDERWOOD DRIVE BICKMORE AVENUE
1.54 mi
CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE
LIMONITE AVE
PARK INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHINO CORONA ROAD KIMBALL AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
317
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE
LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
0.20 mi
HELLMAN AVENUE CHANDLER STREET INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL LIMONITE AVE
INDUSTRIAL SUMMIT DR
INDUSTRIAL HELLMAN AVENU CITY LIMIT ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)
1.54 mi KIMBALL AVENUE
CITY LIMIT INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
318
Appendix D
319
Appendix D
320
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Archibald Avenue to Sumner Avenue
Segment Length (MI): 1 mi
North
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ONTARIO RANCH ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
321
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Sumner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 1.53 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
AGRICULTURE
SCHOLAR WAY
HAMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH
LIMONITE
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
SUMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH
I-15 FWY
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
UNDEVELOPED
AGRICULTURE
RETAIL
Appendix D
322
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD
MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS (I-15)
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL 60 MPH •
Appendix D
323
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
ORANGE STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL
ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •
SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH
SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
AGRICULTURE RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
324
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD
0.26 mi
NOT TO SCALE
RESIDENTIAL
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
325
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVER ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
0.75 mi
NOT TO SCALE
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD
HALL ROAD
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
326
Appendix D
327
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name: Riverside Drive
Street Segment: Hamner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 0.44 mi
North NOT TO SCALE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE
HAMNER AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL
I-15 FWY
• 50 MPH
MILLIKEN AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
328
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
ARCHI BALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •
COMMERCIAL
Appendix D
329
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD
SUMNER
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
HARRISON
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUEAVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
Appendix D
330
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED 45 MPH •
Appendix D
331
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE
0.58 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN
HAMMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
332
Appendix D
333
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
SCHOLAR WAY
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOLAR
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
LIMONITE AVE
WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
Appendix D
334
Appendix D
335
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET
1.12 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
336
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
1.03 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
ORCHARD
PARK
SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
337
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
WHITEWELL ROAD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
0.29 mi
NOT TO SCALE
WHITEWELL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH
PRAIRIE
SMOKE RD
Appendix D
338
339
APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated April 2025)
340
341
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 0 0 45 044 0 2 44 X X 2 Time43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:0539 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E33 1 1 33 X X 2 *32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%29 3 1 29 X X X X 428 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%27 1 2 27 X X X 326 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
342
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 8 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 7 2 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 6% 8% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 80% 78% 73%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 6 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 18%
35 0 3 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
343
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:3049 1 2 49 X X X 348 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 736 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%35 0 2 35 X X 234 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 1 1 33 X X 232 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
344
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:2049 2 2 49 X X X X 448 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 636 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
345
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:2552 1 0 52 X 151 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:5049 1 2 49 X X X 348 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 636 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
346
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:0062 0 1 62 X 161 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:2559 1 2 59 X X X 358 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%47 2 2 47 X X X X 446 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%45 0 1 45 X 144 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH43 0 0 43 042 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
347
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 1 3 59 X X X X 458 4 0 58 X X X X 457 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:0552 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:3049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 744 1 3 44 X X X X 443 1 0 43 X 142 1 0 42 X 141 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
348
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
349
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 1 45 X 144 1 1 44 X X 2 Time43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P32 0 1 32 X 1 A31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 624 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
350
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:2052 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 751 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:4049 0 1 49 X 148 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%37 2 2 37 X X X X 436 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%35 1 1 35 X X 234 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
351
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:4062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:5559 0 0 59 058 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 2 0 56 X X 255 3 2 55 X X X X X 554 0 3 54 X X X 3 *53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13%45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH43 3 2 43 X X X X X 542 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 1 0 40 X 139 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
352
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 0 0 44 0 Time43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:1042 1 0 42 X 141 1 0 41 X 1 Time40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:5039 2 0 39 X X 238 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%25 2 2 25 X X X X 424 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH23 1 0 23 X 122 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
353
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 4 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 5 3 51 X X X X X X X X 8 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 *
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 38% 44% 41%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 C
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 60% 54% 56%
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 2% 2% 3%
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 *
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
354
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 655 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:4052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:1549 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
355
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
356
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:4052 2 0 52 X X 251 2 0 51 X X 2 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:0049 1 1 49 X X 2 *48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%39 1 1 39 X X 238 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
357
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 3 0 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:3042 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:2039 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *34 1 0 34 X 133 3 2 33 X X X X X 532 2 0 32 X X 231 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
358
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 * Time
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 * From: 11:50
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 P Time
40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A To: 12:20
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 C
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 E Existing
37 5 2 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 6 36 X X X X X X X X 8 *
35 0 3 35 X X X 3 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5
31 2 0 31 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 3 0 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 4% 12% 10%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 2 0 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 60% 74% 65%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 36% 14% 25%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 35 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
359
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:2062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:4059 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 0 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 0 1 56 X 155 1 0 55 X 154 4 2 54 X X X X X X 653 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11%45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH43 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH41 0 3 41 X X X 340 1 0 40 X 139 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH38 0 1 38 X 137 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
360
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:5052 1 2 52 X X X 351 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:1049 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%39 1 2 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%37 0 0 37 036 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
361
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:0052 1 3 52 X X X X 451 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:2049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%39 2 0 39 X X 238 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
362
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 1:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 1:25
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 P
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 A
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
41 6 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 22% 14% 20% 39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 69%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
363
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive62 0 1 62 X 161 0 1 61 X 160 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 1 1 58 X X 257 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:56 1 3 56 X X X X 455 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:5552 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:1549 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 1 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 543 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 3 1 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%39 1 0 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
364
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
365
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 1 58 X 157 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 2 56 X X 255 1 0 55 X 154 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:1052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:3049 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%39 0 1 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
366
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:5052 2 0 52 X X 251 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:2049 4 2 49 X X X X X X 648 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 * 38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 336 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
367
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Blossom Way
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 From: 11:30
42 2 0 42 X X 2
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 3 0 40 X X X 3 To: 12:20
39 2 1 39 X X X 3 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
36 0 5 36 X X X X X 5 P
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 5 5 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
33 2 3 33 X X X X X 5 E
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 1 3 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 2% 8% 18%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 0 3 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 68% 70% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 30% 22% 17%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
368
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:1562 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:0059 1 2 59 X X X 358 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%45 2 0 45 X X 244 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH43 0 1 43 X 142 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
369
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue)72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:0062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:2559 0 1 59 X 158 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 3 2 56 X X X X X 555 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 * 54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P 51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E 48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 644 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH43 1 1 43 X X 242 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
370
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
Appendix E
371
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Cucamonga Creek Channel 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 10:25
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:00
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 0 3 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 *
52 2 1 52 X X X 3 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 P % Over Pace: 4% 18% 10%
49 4 4 49 X X X X X X X X 8 A
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % In Pace: 68% 80% 73% 47 4 8 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 28% 2% 17%
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH 43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 3 0 42 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 3 0 40 X X X 3
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 38 1 0 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
372
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Cucamonga Creek Channel - Archibald Avenue 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:05
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:25
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 1 57 X 1 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 6 2 54 X X X X X X X X 8
53 1 1 53 X X 2
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 4 2 51 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 6% 18% 19%
49 6 4 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 P % In Pace: 74% 68% 66%
47 4 3 47 X X X X X X X 7 A
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Under Pace: 20% 14% 15% 45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 E
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 43 2 4 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 5 42 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4
39 0 2 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
373
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 0 1 58 X 157 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 1 1 56 X X 255 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 754 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:4552 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:0549 1 2 49 X X X 3 C48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 2 3 44 X X X X X 543 1 2 43 X X X 342 1 2 42 X X X 341 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%39 1 1 39 X X 238 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%37 3 0 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
374
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 4 1 56 X X X X X 555 2 2 55 X X X X 454 2 0 54 X X 2 Time53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:0552 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 *51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:2549 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 642 0 4 42 X X X X 441 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 0 0 39 038 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
375
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
Appendix E
376
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:2052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:1549 0 1 49 X 148 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH46 3 1 46 X X X X 445 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%35 0 4 35 X X X X 434 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH33 1 2 33 X X X 332 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 1 30 X 129 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
377
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 1 0 47 X 1 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 4 2 45 X X X X X X 644 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:0039 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%29 4 0 29 X X X X 428 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%27 2 2 27 X X X X 426 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%25 3 0 25 X X X 324 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
378
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
379
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:1052 0 0 52 051 0 2 51 X X 2 Time50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:2049 1 2 49 X X X 348 0 1 48 X 1 Existing47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 4 1 46 X X X X X 545 1 0 45 X 144 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH33 2 2 33 X X X X 432 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH31 0 1 31 X 130 0 3 30 X X X 329 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH28 0 0 28 027 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH26 1 0 26 X 125 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By: