Agenda packet — Eastvale City Council, June 24, 2026 (part 9 of 10)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 034 SS-34 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:10 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
o-Terphenyl (OTP) 81 %REC EPA 8015B 50-150 12/09/16 VS
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/11/16 TLB Lead 13.9 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/11/16 TLB
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 79 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 81 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2978 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 46 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 035 SS-35 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:20 Sample Matrix: Soil
[TPH Gasoline C4-C12]
Gasoline (C4-C12) <0.20 mg/Kg EPA 8015M 1 0.20 12/08/16 AR [Extractable Hydrocarbons]
Extraction Complete EPA 3550B 1 12/08/16 VS
Diesel <10 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 10 12/10/16 VS
Motor Oil <20 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 20 12/10/16 VS
[Surrogate]
o-Terphenyl (OTP) 80 %REC EPA 8015B 50-150 12/10/16 VS
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/11/16 TLB Lead 9.22 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/11/16 TLB
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2979 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 47 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 035 SS-35 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:20 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 81 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 036 SS-36 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 9:48
Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 2.71 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 037 SS-37 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:12 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 13.6 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 038 SS-38 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:39 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 15.1 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 039 SS-39 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:49 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 12.4 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 040 SS-40 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:58 Sample Matrix: Soil
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2980 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 48 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 040 SS-40 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:58 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 157 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 041 SS-41 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:16 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 35.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 042 SS-42 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:26 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 10.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 043 SS-43 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:37 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 10.7 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 044 SS-44 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:46 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 8.19 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Sample: 045 SS-45 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 12:40 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Lead 8.78 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2981 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 49 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 046 SS-50 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:24 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals Title 22 no Hg]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Antimony <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Arsenic <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Barium 153 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Beryllium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cadmium 0.542 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Chromium 21.3 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cobalt 5.36 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Copper 11.7 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Lead 17.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Molybdenum 0.543 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Nickel 7.98 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Selenium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Silver <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Thallium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Vanadium 93.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Zinc 139 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 5.00 12/09/16 TLB
[Mercury]
Mercury Digestion Complete EPA 7471A 1 12/12/16 JEN
Mercury <0.20 mg/Kg EPA 7471A 1 0.20 12/12/16 JEN
Sample: 047 SS-53 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:38 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals Title 22 no Hg]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Antimony <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Arsenic <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Barium 124 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Beryllium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cadmium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2982 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 50 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 047 SS-53 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:38 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Chromium 22.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cobalt 5.25 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Copper 23.5 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Lead 11.6 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Molybdenum <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Nickel 8.97 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Selenium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Silver <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Thallium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Vanadium 75.7 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Zinc 91.3 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 5.00 12/09/16 TLB
[Mercury]
Mercury Digestion Complete EPA 7471A 1 12/12/16 JEN
Mercury <0.20 mg/Kg EPA 7471A 1 0.20 12/12/16 JEN
Sample: 048 SS-55 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:47 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals Title 22 no Hg]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Antimony <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Arsenic <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Barium 138 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Beryllium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cadmium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Chromium 22.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cobalt 5.36 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Copper 30.1 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Lead 7.67 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Molybdenum 0.986 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Nickel 8.62 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Selenium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2983 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 51 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 048 SS-55 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:47 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Silver <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Thallium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Vanadium 85.7 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Zinc 102 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 5.00 12/09/16 TLB
[Mercury]
Mercury Digestion Complete EPA 7471A 1 12/12/16 JEN
Mercury <0.20 mg/Kg EPA 7471A 1 0.20 12/12/16 JEN
Sample: 049 SS-60 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 14:09 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals Title 22 no Hg]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 12/09/16 TLB Antimony <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Arsenic <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Barium 138 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Beryllium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cadmium <0.500 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Chromium 20.3 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Cobalt 5.17 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Copper 30.1 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Lead 5.60 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Molybdenum 0.604 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Nickel 7.54 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Selenium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Silver <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Thallium <1.00 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 1.00 12/09/16 TLB
Vanadium 88.9 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 12/09/16 TLB
Zinc 75.7 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 5.00 12/09/16 TLB
[Mercury]
Mercury Digestion Complete EPA 7471A 1 12/12/16 JEN
Mercury <0.20 mg/Kg EPA 7471A 1 0.20 12/12/16 JEN
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2984 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 52 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 050 COMPOSITE A Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:39 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane 0.021 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD 0.0044 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 80 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 76 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 051 COMPOSITE C Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:44 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2985 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 53 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 051 COMPOSITE C Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 10:44 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane 0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 76 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 052 COMPOSITE B Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:26 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2986 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 54 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 052 COMPOSITE B Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:26 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 81 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 75 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 053 COMPOSITE D Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:30 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2987 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 55 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 053 COMPOSITE D Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 11:30 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 85 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 054 COMPOSITE E Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:13 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2988 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 56 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 054 COMPOSITE E Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:13 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 80 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 055 COMPOSITE F Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:34 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2989 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 57 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 055 COMPOSITE F Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:34 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/10/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/10/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/10/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/10/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 79 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 81 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/10/16 JEN Sample: 056 COMPOSITE G Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:43 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/11/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2990 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 58 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 056 COMPOSITE G Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:43 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/11/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/11/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/11/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/11/16 JEN Sample: 057 COMPOSITE H Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:55 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/09/16 VS
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/11/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/11/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/11/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/11/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2991 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 59 of 59 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77917
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/14/16
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 057 COMPOSITE H Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/16 @ 13:55 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/11/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 80 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/11/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 79 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/11/16 JEN Respectfully Submitted:

Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

As regulatory limits change frequently, A & R Laboratories advises the recipient of this report to confirm such limits with the appropriate federal, state, or local authorities before acting in reliance on the regulatory limits provided.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 2992 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 4 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
77917
1035
12/06/2016
Customer P.O.
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
12/14/2016
12/07/2016
BD-000727-03 Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 60333 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Antimony 101 106 4.3 Arsenic 104 104 0.1 Barium 101 100 1.0 Beryllium 100 99 0.7 Cadmium 99 100 0.9 Chromium 102 101 1.1 Cobalt 99 101 1.2 Copper 100 99 0.4 Lead 100 100 0.7 Molybdenum 100 102 1.0 Nickel 99 100 1.1 Selenium 102 103 1.2 Silver 101 99 1.3 Thallium 102 104 2.1 Vanadium 101 100 0.7 Zinc 99 100 1.3 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20 QC Reference # 60336 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: TLB Samples 011 046 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Antimony 96 101 4.6 Arsenic 102 103 0.7 Barium 101 100 1.1 Beryllium 98 97 0.7 Cadmium 100 100 0.1 Chromium 106 105 1.5 Cobalt 102 102 0.7 Copper 99 99 0.0 Lead 99 101 1.5 Molybdenum 95 97 2.5 Nickel 98 99 0.5 Selenium 96 98 2.5 Silver 87 85 1.6 Thallium 108 106 2.5 Vanadium 100 99 0.7 Zinc 98 98 0.2 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20 QC Reference # 60337 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: TLB Samples 028 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 99 101 1.5 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
2993
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 2 of 4 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS Date Reported
Date Received
Date Sampled 12/06/2016
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
12/14/2016
12/07/2016 Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 60343 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: TLB Samples 047 048 049 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Antimony 97 107 10.0 Arsenic 110 109 0.9 Barium 101 102 0.9 Beryllium 100 101 0.9 Cadmium 103 104 1.1 Chromium 107 107 0.1 Cobalt 104 105 0.6 Copper 102 102 0.4 Lead 105 106 0.5 Molybdenum 101 106 5.0 Nickel 105 105 0.6 Selenium 106 108 2.1 Silver 85 82 3.9 Thallium 99 114 13.7 Vanadium 102 103 1.2 Zinc 105 105 0.3 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20 QC Reference # 60366 Date Analyzed: 12/11/2016 Technician: TLB Samples 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 92 95 3 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 Method # EPA 7471A QC Reference # 60365 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Mercury 95 92 3 85 89 5 Control Ranges LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 25 0 - 25 QC Reference # 60390 Date Analyzed: 12/12/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 046 047 048 049 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Mercury 92 95 3 85 89 5 Control Ranges LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 25 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8015B QC Reference # 60417 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: VS 2994
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 3 of 4 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS Date Reported
Date Received
Date Sampled 12/06/2016
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
12/14/2016
12/07/2016 Method # EPA 8015B QC Reference # 60417 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: VS Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Diesel 92 90 93 3 Control Ranges LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25 QC Reference # 60418 Date Analyzed: 12/10/2016 Technician: VS Samples 035 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Diesel 95 92 91 1 Control Ranges LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8015M
QC Reference # 60395 Date Analyzed: 12/8/2016 Technician: AR Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Gasoline (C4-C12) 95 90 5 98 92 6 Control Ranges LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25 0 - 25 QC Reference # 60396 Date Analyzed: 12/8/2016 Technician: AR Samples 035 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD Gasoline (C4-C12) 94 98 4 96 99 3 Control Ranges LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8081A QC Reference # 60420 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD
4,4'-DDT 84 86 85 2 Aldrin 85 88 89 2 Dieldrin 82 82 87 2 Endrin 81 81 82 5 gamma-BHC 89 87 86 2 Heptachlor 86 85 81 Control Ranges
LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 QC Reference # 60422 Date Analyzed: 12/10/2016 Technician: JEN 2995
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 4 of 4 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS Date Reported
Date Received
Date Sampled 12/06/2016
1612-00051
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
12/14/2016
12/07/2016 Method # EPA 8081A QC Reference # 60422 Date Analyzed: 12/10/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 050 051 052 053 054 055 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD
4,4'-DDT 93 92 82 10 Aldrin 92 90 85 6 Dieldrin 89 87 81 7 Endrin 88 86 80 7 gamma-BHC 91 91 86 5 Heptachlor 86 88 89 2 Control Ranges
LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25 QC Reference # 60424 Date Analyzed: 12/11/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 056 057 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD
4,4'-DDT 89 82 87 6 Aldrin 92 89 89 0 Dieldrin 88 84 86 3 Endrin 93 82 82 0 gamma-BHC 91 88 85 4 Heptachlor 95 81 81 0 Control Ranges
LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8081A/8082 QC Reference # 60420 Date Analyzed: 12/9/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 No QC recoveries reported. QC Reference # 60422 Date Analyzed: 12/10/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 050 051 052 053 054 055 No QC recoveries reported. QC Reference # 60424 Date Analyzed: 12/11/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 056 057 No QC recoveries reported.

No method blank results were above reporting limit
Respectfully Submitted:

Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 4 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
12/20/2016 12:03:06 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1612-00155 Project Name / No. RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA BD-000727-03 Dates Sampled (from/to) 12/14/16 To 12/14/16
Dates Received (from/to) 12/19/16 To 12/19/16
Dates Reported (from/to) 12/20/16 To 12/20/2016
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

Subcontracting
Organic Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Sample Condition(s)
All samples intact
Positive Results (Organic Compounds)
None
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3005 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77968
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00155
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/20/16
12/19/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS 35@2 Date & Time Sampled: 12/14/16 @ 14:00 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Extractable Hydrocarbons]
Extraction Complete EPA 3550B 1 12/19/16 VS
Diesel <10 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 10 12/19/16 VS
Motor Oil <20 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 20 12/19/16 VS
[Surrogate]
o-Terphenyl (OTP) 80 %REC EPA 8015B 50-150 12/19/16 VS
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/19/16 JEN
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/20/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/20/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/20/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 78 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/20/16 JEN Decachlorobiphenyl 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/20/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3006 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77968
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00155
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/20/16
12/19/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 002 SS 32@2 Date & Time Sampled: 12/14/16 @ 14:15 Sample Matrix: Soil
[Extractable Hydrocarbons]
Extraction Complete EPA 3550B 1 12/19/16 VS
Diesel <10 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 10 12/19/16 VS
Motor Oil <20 mg/Kg EPA 8015B 1 20 12/19/16 VS
[Surrogate]
o-Terphenyl (OTP) 78 %REC EPA 8015B 50-150 12/19/16 VS
[Pesticides]
Ultrasonic Extraction Complete EPA 3550 1 12/19/16 JEN
Aldrin <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN
alpha-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN beta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN
delta-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN gamma-BHC <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Chlordane <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDD <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDE <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
4,4'-DDT <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Dieldrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Endosulfan I <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Endosulfan II <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endrin <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN
Endrin Aldehyde <0.0020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0020 12/20/16 JEN Endrin ketone <0.100 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.100 12/20/16 JEN Heptachlor <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.0010 12/20/16 JEN Methoxychlor <0.010 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.010 12/20/16 JEN Toxaphene <0.020 mg/Kg EPA 8081A 1 0.020 12/20/16 JEN
[Surrogates]
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 85 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/20/16 JEN The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3007 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
77968
1035
BD-000727-03
1612-00155
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
12/20/16
12/19/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 002 SS 32@2 Date & Time Sampled: 12/14/16 @ 14:15 Sample Matrix: Soil
.....continued
Decachlorobiphenyl 82 %REC EPA 8081A/8082 50-150 12/20/16 JEN Respectfully Submitted:

Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3008 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
77968
1035
12/14/2016
Customer P.O.
1612-00155
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
12/20/2016
12/19/2016
BD-000727-03 Method # EPA 8015B QC Reference # 60590 Date Analyzed: 12/19/2016 Technician: VS Samples 001 002 Results LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD
C13-C22 95 87 85 3 Diesel 92 3 86 89 4 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8081A QC Reference # 60592 Date Analyzed: 12/20/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 001 002 Results LCS %REC SPIKE %RECSPIKE %DUPSPIKE %RPD
4,4'-DDT 90 87 86 2 Aldrin 92 85 89 5 Dieldrin 93 89 83 7 Endrin 96 85 88 4 gamma-BHC 95 81 85 5 Heptachlor 95 83 82 2 Control Ranges
LCS %REC SPIKE %RPD
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25
70 - 130 0 - 25 Method # EPA 8081A/8082 QC Reference # 60592 Date Analyzed: 12/20/2016 Technician: JEN Samples 001 002 No QC recoveries reported.

No method blank results were above reporting limit
Respectfully Submitted:

Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3009
3010
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 3 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
01/24/2017 9:24:20 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1701-00188 Project Name / No. RONDO ES PEA 00727.03
Dates Sampled (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Received (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 01/24/17 To 1/24/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

Subcontracting
Inorganic Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Sample Condition(s)
All samples intact
Positive Results (Organic Compounds)
None
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3011 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78273
1035
00727.03
1701-00188
Project: RONDO ES PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
01/24/17
01/20/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-102 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:02 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/23/17 TLB Lead 430 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/23/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS-103 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:05 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/23/17 TLB Lead 51.4 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/23/17 TLB
Sample: 003 SS-107 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:29 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/23/17 TLB Lead 23.3 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/23/17 TLB
Sample: 004 SS-40@1 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:04 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/23/17 TLB Lead 51.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/23/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3012 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 3 of 3 ends

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3013 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78273
1035
01/20/2017
Customer P.O.
1701-00188
Project: RONDO ES PEA
01/24/2017
01/20/2017
00727.03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 61425 Date Analyzed: 1/23/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 003 004 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Arsenic 85 84 0.2 Cadmium 87 87 0.0 Chromium 76 77 1.1
Lead 94 94 0.8
Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3014
3015
3016
3017
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 3 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
01/27/2017 9:32:57 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1701-00232 Project Name / No. Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA 00727.03
Dates Sampled (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Received (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 01/27/17 To 1/27/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3018 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78317
1035
00727.03
1701-00232
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
01/27/17
01/20/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-101 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 9:52 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/25/17 TLB Lead 65.6 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/25/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS-102@1' Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:03 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/25/17 TLB Lead 409 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/25/17 TLB
Sample: 003 SS-106 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:27 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/25/17 TLB Lead 99.0 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/25/17 TLB
Sample: 004 SS-110 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:35 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/25/17 TLB Lead 37.8 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/25/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3019 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 3 of 3 ends

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3020 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78317
1035
01/20/2017
Customer P.O.
1701-00232
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA
01/27/2017
01/20/2017
00727.03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 61513 Date Analyzed: 1/25/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 003 004 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 93 93 0.6 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3021
3022
3023
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 2 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
01/27/2017 16:18:39 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1701-00249 Project Name / No. Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA 00727.03
Dates Sampled (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Received (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 01/27/17 To 1/27/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3024 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 2 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78322
1035
00727.03
1701-00249
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
01/27/17
01/20/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-105 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:25 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/27/17 TLB Lead 70.5 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/27/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS-106@1' Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:25 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 01/27/17 TLB Lead 80.2 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 01/27/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3025 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78322
1035
01/20/2017
Customer P.O.
1701-00249
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ES PEA
01/27/2017
01/20/2017
00727.03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 61580 Date Analyzed: 1/27/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 97 97 0.2 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3026
3027
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 2 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
02/13/2017 12:47:39 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1702-00097 Project Name / No. RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PEA BD-000727-04 Dates Sampled (from/to) 02/09/17 To 02/09/17
Dates Received (from/to) 02/09/17 To 02/09/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 02/13/17 To 2/13/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3028 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 2 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78483
1035
BD-000727-04
1702-00097
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
02/13/17
02/09/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS 102 @ 2 Date & Time Sampled: 02/09/17 11:25 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 02/13/17 TLB Lead 1.46 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 02/13/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS 106 @ 2 Date & Time Sampled: 02/09/17 11:40 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
Metals Acid Digestion Complete EPA 3050B 1 02/13/17 TLB Lead 9.56 mg/Kg EPA 6010B 1 0.500 02/13/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3029 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78483
1035
02/09/2017
Customer P.O.
1702-00097
Project: RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PEA
02/13/2017
02/09/2017
BD-000727-04
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 61981 Date Analyzed: 2/13/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Arsenic 102 100 2.7 Cadmium 101 101 0.7 Chromium 99 99 0.0 Lead 99 97 2.4 Zinc 99 100 0.1
Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3030
3031
3032
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 3 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
02/10/2017 12:41:25 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1702-00092 Project Name / No. Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA 00727-03 Dates Sampled (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Received (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 02/10/17 To 2/10/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

Subcontracting
Inorganic Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Other Analyses
No analyses sub-contracted
Sample Condition(s)
All samples intact
Positive Results (Organic Compounds)
None
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3033 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78469
1035
00727-03
1702-00092
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
02/10/17
01/20/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-102 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:02 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
STLC Complete Title 22 50 02/09/17 TLB
Lead 2.76 mg/L EPA 6010B 50 1.00 02/09/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS-102 @ 1' Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:03 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
STLC Complete Title 22 50 02/09/17 TLB
Lead 74.2 mg/L EPA 6010B 50 1.00 02/09/17 TLB
Sample: 003 SS-106 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:27 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
STLC Complete Title 22 50 02/09/17 TLB
Lead 5.88 mg/L EPA 6010B 50 1.00 02/09/17 TLB
Sample: 004 SS-106 @ 1' Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:28 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
STLC Complete Title 22 50 02/09/17 TLB
Lead 3.94 mg/L EPA 6010B 50 1.00 02/09/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director
The data and information on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon condition that it is not to be reproduced, wholly or in part, for advertising or other purposes without approval from the laboratory.

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3034 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 3 of 3 ends

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3035 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78469
1035
01/20/2017
Customer P.O.
1702-00092
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
02/10/2017
01/20/2017
00727-03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 61911 Date Analyzed: 2/9/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 003 004 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 99 98 0.9 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3036
3037
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 2 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
02/14/2017 12:38:45 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1702-00091 Project Name / No. Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA BD-000727-03
Dates Sampled (from/to) 12/06/17 To 12/06/17
Dates Received (from/to) 12/07/16 To 12/07/16
Dates Reported (from/to) 02/14/17 To 2/14/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3038 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 2 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78497
1035
BD-000727-03
1702-00091
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
02/14/17
12/07/16
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-40 Date & Time Sampled: 12/06/17 10:58 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
STLC Complete Title 22 50 02/13/17 TLB
Lead 1.27 mg/L EPA 6010B 50 1.00 02/13/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3039 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78497
1035
12/06/2017
Customer P.O.
1702-00091
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
02/14/2017
12/07/2016
BD-000727-03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 62001 Date Analyzed: 2/13/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 104 96 8.2 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3040
3041
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 1 of 2 ends

CASE NARRATIVE
Authorized Signature Name / Title (print) Ken Zheng, President Signature / Date Ken Zheng, President
02/17/2017 11:06:27 Laboratory Job No. (Certificate of Analysis No.) 1702-00129 Project Name / No. Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA 00727-03 Dates Sampled (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Received (from/to) 01/20/17 To 01/20/17
Dates Reported (from/to) 02/17/17 To 2/17/2017
Chains of Custody Received Yes
Comments:

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3042 951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
ELAP#'s
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C
ONTARIO, CA 91761
CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

Page 2 of 2 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Cust #
Permit Number
Customer P.O.
78527
1035
00727-03
1702-00129
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
Analysis Result Method Date
02/17/17
01/20/17
Qual Units DF RL Tech

EARTH SYSTEMS

SCOT STORMO
79-811B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INDIO, CA 92203
Sample: 001 SS-102 @ 1' Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:03 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
TCLP Complete EPA 1311 5 02/16/17 TLB
Lead <0.100 mg/L EPA 6010B 5 0.100 02/16/17 TLB
Sample: 002 SS-106 Date & Time Sampled: 01/20/17 10:27 @ Sample Matrix: Soil
[Metals]
TCLP Complete EPA 1311 5 02/16/17 TLB
Lead <0.100 mg/L EPA 6010B 5 0.100 02/16/17 TLB
Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - Lab Director

ABBREVIATIONS
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Reporting Limit, Adjusted by DF
MDL = Method Detection Limit, Adjusted by DF
Qual = Qualifier
Tech = Technician

QUALIFIERS
B = Detected in the associated Method Blank at a concentration above the routine RL.

B1 = BOD dilution water is over specifications . The reported result may be biased high.

D = Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to sample dilution.

E = Estimated value; Value exceeds calibration level of instrument.

H = Analyte was prepared and/or analyzed outside of the analytical method holding time I = Matrix Interference.

J = Analyte concentration detected between RL and MDL.

Q = One or more quality control criteria did not meet specifications. See Comments for further explanation.

S = Customer provided specification limit exceeded.

For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].

USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 3043 CHEMISTRY · MICROBIOLOGY · FOOD SAFETY · MOBILE LABORATORIES FOOD · COSMETICS · WATER · SOIL · SOIL VAPOR · WASTES
951-779-0310
FDA#
LA City#
1650 S. GROVE AVE., SUITE C ELAP#'s
ONTARIO, CA 91761
FAX 951-779-0344
2030513
10261
2789
2790
2122
A & R Laboratories
Formerly Microbac Southern California
www.arlaboratories.com [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 1 ends

EARTH SYSTEMS
INDIO, CA 92203 Date Reported
Date Received
Invoice No.

Customer #
Date Sampled
78527
1035
01/20/2017
Customer P.O.
1702-00129
Project: Addt'l - RONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEA
02/17/2017
01/20/2017
00727-03
Method # EPA 6010B QC Reference # 62116 Date Analyzed: 2/16/2017 Technician: TLB Samples 001 002 Results LCS %REC LCS %DUP LCS %RPD
Lead 92 89 3.6 Control Ranges
LCS %REC LCS %RPD
75 - 125 0 - 20 No method blank results were above reporting limit Respectfully Submitted: Ken Zheng - President
For any feedback concerning our services, please contact Jenny Jiang, Project Manager at 951.779.0310. You may also contact Ken Zheng, President at [email protected].
3044
3045

APPENDIX E
Laboratory Data Validation Memoranda
3046

EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL MEMORANDUM
Project: Proposed Rondo Elementary School, Eastvale, California File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐718
Task: PEA QA/QC Review
QA/QC Reviewed by: Scot Stormo, PG, CHG, Earth Systems Southwest Date: February 27, 2017

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This memorandum has been prepared to document the Quality Assurance/Quality Control [QA/QC] activities performed as part of the project and task referenced above. QA/QC is the process used to verify that the data obtained during testing are accurate, precise, representative, and legally defensible. QA/QC includes activities to verify the collection of high quality samples, laboratory procedures to verify the proper function of the analytical equipment, and the collection and analysis of QA/QC samples to provide a means of identifying potential problems with the quality of the data. QA/QC includes activities performed by the sample collection team, the laboratory, and the data reviewers.

2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
The subject site consists of a former dairy farm that is proposed to be redeveloped as an elementary school. Samples have been collected and analyzed as part of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment [PEA] to evaluate whether chemicals are present on the site that might pose a threat to the health of future students, faculty and staff. The scope of work for the PEA was developed based on the findings of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and discussions with DTSC staff. Compounds of potential concern [COPCs] included metals, fuels, solvents, methane, and organochlorine pesticides [OCPs]. See the PEA report for additional details.

This memorandum has been prepared to review and validate the laboratory reports for samples obtained December 6, 2016, through February 9, 2017.

3.0 METHODS

3.1 Field Activities
Field activities were reviewed to evaluate compliance with the TM and other appropriate sampling protocols, including the following:
 Documentation
 Supplies
 Decontamination
 Equipment Calibration and Maintenance
 QC Samples
 Background Samples
 Variance from the Plan
3047
February 28, 2017 2 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEM SOUTHWEST

3.2 Laboratory Data Review
The data review process includes reviewing the laboratory report regarding information about the samples, and review of the QA/QC information provided with the laboratory report to identify potential problems with the data.

3.2.1 Sample Information
The review of the sample information includes the following:
 Completeness of the Laboratory Report
 Chain of Custody
 Condition of Sample Containers
 Holding Times
 Preservation
 Flags
 Case Narrative

3.2.2 Analysis Information
The analytical laboratory used for this project has internal QA/QC procedures designed to ensure the quality of their results. Those procedures are an integral part of the process to obtain certification for the various test methods. Using only certified laboratories is one of the QA/QC procedures implemented on this project. The laboratory has an internal QA/QC process for verifying the function of their analytical instruments, and it is the laboratory’s responsibility to perform those activities and correct any deficiencies identified. An audit of the laboratories internal QA/QC process was beyond the scope of this project except for: (1) Review of the QA/QC data presented in the laboratory report; and (2) Review of any “flags” attached to the laboratory data for indications of issues associated with the data.

The results of project‐specific QA/QC analyses were reviewed to look for discrepancies between the actual and target values. The QA/QC analyses performed as part of this project include internal laboratory testing of matrix spikes [MS] and duplicates [MSD]; laboratory control samples and duplicates [LCS and LCSD]); the addition of surrogates to samples for some test methods; and collecting and analyzing duplicate samples. Note that comparison of duplicate samples is discussed in the PEA report.
 MS results are obtained by spiking a portion of an actual sample with known amounts of contaminants and then analyzing the spiked sample to verify that the laboratory test can detect the compounds in the matrix being tested. This is performed mostly for organic compounds that are not naturally occurring. MS results are evaluated for both the percent recovery of the spiked compound and the “relative percent difference” [RPD] between the MS and MSD. The RPD is a measure of the difference between the two results. The RPD is equal to the difference in the two values divided by the average of the two values {(A‐B)/[(A+B)/2]}, expressed as a percent. RPD result can range from 0% (no difference in the values) to 200% (one concentration is 0 and the other is more 3048
February 28, 2017 3 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEM SOUTHWEST
than 0). Liquids and gases should have RPDs of nearly 0% while the RPD of a soil can be influenced by differences inherent in the soil.
 The LCS and LCSD results are obtained by spiking a sample that is not associated with the site. The LCS and LCSD results are evaluated using the same procedure as for MS and MSD results.
 Surrogates are chemicals similar to the target analytes that are added to samples to verify that the instruments are working properly. Surrogates are evaluated by comparing the added concentration to the detected concentration to obtain the percent recovered. Surrogates are used primarily when analyzing for organic constituents, such as VOCs and OCPs.
 Duplicate samples consist of samples that are collected and handled in the same manner as the regular sample and tested for the same constituents as the regular sample collected from the same location. The results of the regular and duplicate samples are compared using the RPD. For soil samples, the “duplicate” is more properly called either a replicate or a split sample, because soil is inherently variable over small distances.

The data review process includes reviewing the laboratory report regarding information about the samples, and review of the QA/QC results as compared to the target criteria to identify potential problems with the data. The target RPDs and percent recoveries vary by chemical class and test method.

4.0 QA/QC REVIEW RESULTS
Three rounds of sample collection were conducted as part of the PEA; the first round was on December 6 through 15, 2016, the second round was on January 20, 2017, and the third round was on February 9, 2017. Most of the initial samples were analyzed immediately. Only four of the second round of samples were analyzed immediately; the others were put on “hold” as provisional samples and the laboratory was subsequently requested to analyze 6 of the held samples as the lateral and vertical extent of elevated concentrations were defined. Only two of the third round of samples were analyzed immediately while the other two samples were put on hold. In addition, samples with elevated concentrations of lead were reanalyzed to characterize the leachability of lead for disposal characterization. This resulted in a total of 9 separate laboratory reports. A table summarizing the QA/QC review results for the lab reports is attached to this document. General information regarding the reports and explanations of noteworthy features in each, are summarized below.

4.1 Field Activities
 Documentation: Field documentation consisted of logging each sample collected for laboratory analysis on a Chain‐of‐Custody form, and keeping notes of on‐site activities.

Issues of concern were not noted in the field documentation.  Supplies: Soil samples were retained in new four‐ounce glass jars with Teflon lids, 3049
February 28, 2017 4 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEM SOUTHWEST
supplied by the laboratory.  Ice was used to keep the samples cold until delivery to the laboratory.   Soil gas samples were obtained in syringes (see the soil gas report for a detailed discussion of the methods used).
 Decontamination: Prior to soil sampling, the sample locations were excavated to 3 inches with a shovel, then the area was cleared with a clean stainless‐steel trowel that was decontaminated between locations.  Once the target soil was exposed, the sample jar was driven directly into the soil to obtain a “surface” soil sample.   For deeper samples, a hand‐auger was used to drill to target depth and the sample was collected from the blade portion of the auger once the target depth was reached.  The hand auger was decontaminated between depth intervals.
 Equipment Calibration and Maintenance: Electronic field equipment was not used during this sampling episode.
 QC Samples: Duplicates were collected adjacent to original samples, and therefore the depth of the sample and of the duplicate remained consistent.  A total of 14 duplicates were collected and 10 were analyzed.  The extras were collected as provisional samples but were not needed.

Field and equipment blanks were not collected as part of the soil sampling, but equipment blanks were analyzed as part of the soil gas sampling. No problems were identified in the testing of the equipment blanks.
 Background Samples: Background soil samples were not collected as part of this evaluation.
 Variance from the Plan: Variances from the TM regarding sample collection or laboratory analysis were:
o “Step‐out” samples were collected around sample location SS‐40 to evaluate the lateral and vertical extent of elevated lead concentrations detected in that sample.

The step‐out samples were collected at a spacing of 5 feet along the perimeter of the building, and a distance of 2 feet outward from the samples along the building.

Vertical step‐out samples were collected where elevated concentrations were detected in shallower samples. The vertical step‐out interval was 1 foot per round of testing.

4.2 Sample Information
 Completeness of the Laboratory Report: All submitted samples were requested to be analyzed on a normal turn‐around time or “rush” basis. Some samples were collected as provisional samples, submitted with the main samples, and put on hold at the lab.

Subsequent requests for analysis of these held samples were presented in separate laboratory reports.
3050
February 28, 2017 5 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEM SOUTHWEST
 Chain of Custody: The chain‐of‐custody forms are attached and list all of the samples analyzed in each report, including time and date of collection, sample containers, matrix type, sampler’s signature, and laboratory signature.
 Condition of Sample Containers: The samples were carried to the laboratory by a courier. The report indicates the samples were received intact by the laboratory.  Holding Times: The samples were analyzed on a normal turn around or “rush” basis.

Holding times were met.
 Preservation: The soil samples were chilled prior to being delivered to the laboratory.

No other preservation technique is required for this matrix and these test methods. The soil gas samples were analyzed immediately and were not preserved.  Flags: The laboratory report was reviewed to identify if any of the data was “flagged” to indicate problems with their ability to analyze the samples. No flags were noted in the lab reports.
 Case Narrative: No comments were provided in the case narrative section of the laboratory report.

4.3 Laboratory Information
 Laboratories and Certifications: A & R Laboratories [ARL] was used to perform the soil analyses. ARL is certified for these analyses. ARL’s ELAP certification numbers are 2789, 2790 and 2122. Optimal Technology performed the soil gas survey. Optimal’s ELAP certification number is 2779.
 Analytical Methods: The samples in this laboratory report were analyzed as follows:
o Organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] using EPA method 8081A o Heavy metals using EPA method 6010B
o Mercury using EPA method 7471A
o Total petroleum hydrocarbons [TPH] using EPA method 8015 modified o Volatile organic compounds [VOCs] in soil gas using EPA method 8260B modified o Methane, oxygen and carbon dioxide ion soil gas using a Landtec GEM 2000 hand held detector
These are appropriate methods for these analytes.

4.4 QA/QC Data
The laboratory QA/QC data review is summarized in the attached table entitled Summary of QA/QC Review, with the results of each report summarized on a separate line. The quality control tests were within established limits. No problems were identified with the laboratory testing, though the soil gas survey had trouble collecting soil gas samples from a depth of 15 feet, apparently due to soils that were too “tight” to allow gases to move through them at 3051
February 28, 2017 6 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEM SOUTHWEST
significant rates. This issue is not considered significant (if the soil is too tight for gas sampling, it will also be too tight for significant vapor migration).

5.0 CONCLUSIONS
The QA/QC results indicate that the analytical data are of a sufficient quality to meet the needs of this project.
3052
Lab
Name Report No. Report Date
New
Samples
No.

Analyzed
Field
Issues
Date Sampled Sample Info Holding Times LCS/LCSD MS/MSD Tracer Gas Field Calibration Equipment Blanks Surrogates Qualifiers Dilution DL vs. Threshold Comments Optimal na 12/16/2016 21 21
Low
Flow at
15 ft.
12/14/2016 &
12/15/2016 Soil Gas Okay Okay na Okay Okay Okay na None None Okay Soil gas flow rates were too low to
allow sampling at 15 feet. "Deep"samples collected at 11 to 14 feetinstead.

ARL 1612‐00051 12/14/2016 74 71 None 12/6/2016 Soil Okay Okay Okay na na na Okay None None Okay None ARL 1612‐00155 12/20/2016 2 2 None 12/15/2016 Soil Okay Okay Okay na na na Okay None None Okay NoneARL 1701‐00188 1/24/2017 22 4 None 1/20/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None None Okay NoneARL 1701‐00232 1/27/2017 0 4 None 1/20/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None None Okay NoneARL 1701‐00249 1/27/2017 0 2 None 1/20/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None None Okay NoneARL 1702‐00091 2/14/2017 0 1 None 12/6/2016 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None 50 Okay STLC testingARL 1702‐00092 2/10/2017 0 4 None 1/20/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None 50 Okay STLC testingARL 1702‐00097 2/13/2017 4 2 None 2/9/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None None Okay NoneARL 1702‐00129 2/17/2017 0 2 None 1/20/2017 Soil Okay Okay na na na na na None 5 Okay TCLP testing Notes: na = not applicable
Summary of QA/QC Review
3053

APPENDIX F
Risk and Hazard Spreadsheet Printouts
3054
Scenario: Residential
DATA ENTRY SHEET Chemical: Benzene
ENTER ENTER ENTER Soil Gas Conc. Attenuation Factor Indoor Air Conc. Cancer Noncancer Soil Soil (μg/m3) (unitless) (μg/m3) Risk Hazard
Chemical gas OR gas 1.00E+02 7.1E‐04 7.1E‐02 7.3E‐07 2.3E‐02 CAS No. conc., conc.,
(numbers only, Cg Cg
no dashes) (g/m3) (ppmv) Chemical
71432 1.00E+02 Benzene

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER
Depth
MORE below grade Soil gas Vadose zone User-defined
 to bottom sampling Average SCS vadose zone
of enclosed depth soil soil type soil vapor
space floor, below grade, temperature, (used to estimate OR permeability, LF Ls TS soil vapor kv
(15 or 200 cm) (cm) (oC) permeability) (cm2)
15 152 24 SIC

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER
MORE Vandose zone Vadose zone Vadose zone Vadose zone Average vapor  SCS soil dry soil total soil water-filled flow rate into bldg. soil type bulk density, porosity, porosity, (Leave blank to calculate) b
A nV wV Qsoil
(g/cm3) (unitless) (cm3/cm3) (L/m)
SIC 1.38 0.481 0.216 5
MORE
 ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER
Averaging Averaging
time for time for Exposure Exposure Exposure Air Exchange carcinogens, noncarcinogens, duration, frequency, Time Rate

ATC ATNC ED EF ET ACH
(yrs) (yrs) (yrs) (days/yr) (hrs/day) (hour)-1
NEW=> Residential 70 26 26 350 24 0.5
(NEW) (NEW)
END
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Vapor Intrusion Screening Model - Soil Gas

USEPA SG-SCREEN
Version 2.0, 04/2003
DTSC Modification
December 2014
MESSAGE: See VLOOKUP table comments on chemical properties and/or toxicity criteria for this chemical.

Soil Gas Concentration Data Results Summary
Reset to
Defaults
Lookup Soil
Parameters
Lookup Receptor
Parameters
Last Update: December 2014DTSC Human and Ecological Risk Office DTSC Vapor Intrusion Screening Model
Soil Gas

DATENTER

Page 1 of 1 ends

3055

APPENDIX G
References

3056
February 27, 2017 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST

REFERENCES
Bradford, G.R., A.C. Chang, A.L. Page, D Bakhtar, J.A. Frampton and H. Wright, 1996. Background Concentrations of Trace and Major Elementsin California Soils, Kearney Foundation of Soil Science, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, March 1996.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1994.  Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual, January 1994, – Revised October 2015.
_____, 2006a.   Data Validation Memorandum, Summary of the Level II Data Validation for Advanced Technology Laboratory Report ATV5976, Dated April 25, 2006.   Written by Stephanie Lewis, dated May 2, 2006.
_____, 2006b.  Interim Guidance Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead from Lead‐based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers, revised June 9, 2006. _____, 2008.   Interim Guidance of Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision), April 30, 2008.

Earth Systems Southwest, 2016a.  Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Rondo Elementary School, APNs 144‐070‐005 through ‐009, Southeast Corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street, Eastvale, Riverside, California, File No. BD‐00727‐01, Doc. No. 16‐06‐714, dated June 30, 2016.
_____, 2016b.   Geotechnical Engineering and Geologic Hazards Report for Proposed Rondo Elementary School, APNs 144‐070‐005 through ‐009, 7620 Hellman Avenue, Eastvale, Riverside, California, File No. 00727‐02, Document No. 16‐10‐700, dated September 30, 2016.
_____, 2016c.   Revised Draft Technical Memorandum, Scope of Work for Preliminary Endangerment Assessment, Proposed Rondo Elementary School, APNs 144‐070‐005 through ‐009, SEC of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street, Eastvale, Riverside, California, File No. 00727‐03, Document No. 16‐09‐714R, dated November 3, 2016.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, website accessed October 7, 2014.

United States Geologic Survey, 1967, Corona North, Calif., NW/4 Banning 7.5 ‘Quadrangle, photo‐ revised 1981.
3057
February 27, 2017 File No.: 00727‐03
Doc. No.: 17‐02‐719

EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, Regional Screening Values spreadsheet, downloaded January 2015.
3058

APPENDIX H
Housekeeping Action Documentation
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Eastvale
12373 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Attention: City Clerk

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PER
GOVERNMENT CODE §27383
Space above this line for Recorder’s use.

APNs:144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144-070-018, and 144-070-020

AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
AND

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
by and between

THE CITY OF EASTVALE
and
_________________
(Density Bonus Below Market-Rate For-Sale Units)
3065
2 This Affordable Housing Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into effective as of ________________, 202_ (the “Effective Date”) by and among the City of Eastvale, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and _________________, a [California] __________________ (“Developer”). City and Developer are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
The following recitals are an integral part of this Agreement and are binding on the Parties. Capitalized terms used in these Recitals and elsewhere in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms as set forth in Section 2 below.

A. Developer is the owner of the real property located in the City of Eastvale, Riverside County, California, consisting of approximately ___ acres, located at Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 144- 070-016, 144-070-017, 144-070-018, and 144-070-020 in the City of Eastvale, known as Riverside County and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).

B. Developer intends to construct a thirty-five (35) unit residential development (the “Project”) on the Property in accordance with City of Eastvale City Council Resolution No. ______ adopted on __________, 202_, approving the Project subject to conditions of approval related to development of the Property and the Project (“Conditions of Approval”).

C. The Project includes the development of two (2) residential units that will be sold to Eligible Households at an Affordable Sales Price in accordance with the state density bonus provisions in Government Code sections 65915 to 65918 (“Density Bonus Law”).

D. This Agreement is intended to satisfy the requirements of the Density Bonus Law, and to regulate and restrict the Project’s Restricted Units for sale to Eligible Purchasers at Affordable Sales Prices. The Parties intend the covenants set forth in this Agreement to run with the land and to be binding upon Developer and Developer’s successors and assigns.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Recitals Incorporated. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement.

2. Definitions. The following terms shall have the meanings set forth below whenever used in this Agreement or the Exhibits hereto, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. “Actual Household Size" means the actual number of persons in the applicable household.
“Affordable Housing Cost” means a monthly obligation to pay mortgage payments (principal and interest), property taxes, property insurance, mortgage insurance, utilities, and homeowners’ association dues (if applicable) in an aggregate amount not greater than one-twelfth 3066
3 of thirty percent (30%) of fifty percent (50%) of Area Median Income, adjusted for Household Size Appropriate for the Unit.
“Affordable Sales Price” means the maximum sales price for a Restricted Unit as determined by the City pursuant to Exhibit C that will result in an Affordable Housing Cost for the homebuyer.
"Area Median Income" or "AMI" means the median annual income for Riverside County, California, adjusted for Actual Household Size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 and as published from time to time by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development in Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations or successor provision published pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50093(c). “City” means the City of Eastvale, California.
“City’s Authorized Representative” means the City Manager of the City of Eastvale. “City Council” means the City Council of the City of Eastvale. “Claims” is defined in Section 10.
“Conditions of Approval” is defined in Recital B.
“Density Bonus Law” is defined in Recital C.
“Developer” is defined in the preamble to this Agreement. Each reference herein to the “Developer” shall mean the Developer and the Developer’s successors and assigns. “Eligible Purchaser” means a person whose annual household Gross Income does not exceed the qualifying limit for Very Low Income Households and who demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that they:
(i) Will provide funds (cannot be financed) in the amount of at least three percent (3%) of the purchase price of the Restricted Unit; (ii) Will qualify for and obtain a mortgage loan to finance acquisition of the Restricted Unit in a maximum amount equal to ninety-seven percent (97%) of the sales price plus closing costs; and
(iii) Will, after purchase of a Restricted Unit, have a monthly housing cost (principal, interest, taxes, insurance and homeowner association fees) that does not exceed Affordable Housing Cost.
“Excess Proceeds Note” means the Secured Promissory Note that each purchaser of a Restricted Unit will be required to execute for the benefit of City at the closing for the purchase of the Restricted Unit. The Excess Proceeds Note shall be in a form approved by City. 3067
4 “Gross Income” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6914 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations as such Section may be revised from time to time, and shall mean the combined Gross Income of all adult persons in the applicable household. “Household Size Appropriate for the Unit” means the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit plus one, consistent with Section 50052.5(h) of the California Health and Safety Code, subject to the application of federal rules and regulations applicable to Project financing sources (if any).
“Indemnitees” is defined in Section 10.
“Map” means the final Subdivision Map for the Property that will be recorded in the Official Records.
“Market-Rate Units” means the residential units to be constructed within the Project that are not Restricted Units.
“Official Records” means the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder. “Performance Deed of Trust” means the Performance Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents, that each purchaser of a Restricted Unit will be required to execute for the benefit of City to secure the homebuyer obligations under the Resale Restriction Agreement and the Excess Proceeds Note. The Performance Deed of Trust will be in a form approved by City, and will be recorded in the Official Records at the closing for the sale of each Restricted Unit. “Project” is defined in Recital B.
“Property” is defined in Recital A.
“Resale Restriction Agreement” means the Affordable Housing Resale Restriction Agreement and Option to Purchase that each purchaser of a Restricted Unit will be required to execute at the closing for the purchase of the Restricted Unit. The Resale Restriction Agreement shall be in a form approved and executed by City, and will be recorded in the Official Records against the Restricted Unit at the closing for the sale of the Restricted Unit. “Restricted Units” means the four (4) residential units to be constructed within the Project that are required to be sold at Affordable Sales Price to Eligible Purchasers pursuant to this Agreement.
“Restricted Unit Lots” means the individual lots in the Project that will be created upon final map recordation that are designated for Restricted Units as part of the Project. Specifically, the Restricted Unit Lots are lots 44, 51, 59, and 73, each of which have a three-bedroom, 1,905 square-foot Restricted Unit. At times the Restricted Unit Lots are referred to individually herein as a “Restricted Unit Lot.”
“Site Plan” means the site plan for the Project approved by the City Council in conjunction with its approval of the Project and attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Site Plan depicts the location of the Restricted Units.
3068
5 “Very Low Income Household” means a household income that does not exceed the qualifying limit of AMI for very low income families for Riverside County, adjusted for Actual Household Size, as described in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code, as published annually for Riverside County pursuant to 25 California Code of Regulations section 6932, or successor provision(s)..

3. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. Developer shall construct the Project in accordance with plans approved by City, and shall satisfy all Conditions of Approval, including without limitation, all contingencies regarding the issuance of permits, entitlements, and certificates of occupancy for the Project, which shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified by this Agreement. Developer shall comply with the Density Bonus Law by selling four (4) residential units developed within the Project to Eligible Households at Affordable Sales Prices in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

4. Restricted Units, Income Categories. Developer hereby covenants and agrees for itself and its successors and assigns, that all of the Restricted Units shall be sold to Eligible Households at Affordable Sales Price in accordance with this Agreement. The Restricted Units shall consist of two (2) three-bedroom units and shall be restricted for sale at Affordable Sales Prices to Eligible Purchasers that qualify as Very Low Income Households. Developer agrees for itself and its successors and assigns to give priority to Eligible Households that currently reside in the City of Eastvale in the purchase of the Restricted Units, to the extent permissible under applicable state and federal laws and regulations. In connection with the sale of each Restricted Unit, the City and the homebuyer will execute a Resale Restriction Agreement that will be recorded against the Restricted Unit, the homebuyer will be obligated to execute and deliver to City an Excess Proceeds Note, and the homebuyer will be obligated to execute a Performance Deed of Trust that will be recorded against the Restricted Unit. Among other requirements, the Resale Restriction Agreement for each Restricted Unit shall provide that the Restricted Unit must be occupied as the homebuyer’s principal residence. Developer shall not sell or transfer any Restricted Unit unless and until the documents described above are executed and approved by City.

5. Phasing; Location; Amenities. The Restricted Units shall be constructed and made available for sale to Eligible Households concurrently with the Market-Rate Units throughout the construction of the Project. The Restricted Units shall not be concentrated in one location within the Project, but instead shall be dispersed throughout the Project, and shall be located as shown on the Site Plan. The Restricted Units shall be comparable to the Market-Rate Units in the Project in their appearance, materials, and exterior and interior finishes, appliances, and fixtures.

The Restricted Units must contain dishwashers, refrigerators, garbage disposals, cooking facilities, and laundry facilities. The City shall have the right to inspect the Restricted Units to determine whether they have been constructed in accordance with this Section. Residents of Restricted Units shall have access to all Project amenities and recreational facilities available to residents of the Project’s Market-Rate Units.

6. Recordation of Agreement; Term. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records against the Restricted Unit Lots in the Project promptly following its execution by all Parties and recordation of the final map for the Project that will create the Restricted Unit Lots.

This Agreement shall remain effective and fully binding regardless of any sale, assignment, 3069
6 transfer, or conveyance of any of the Restricted Unit Lots or Restricted Units or any part thereof or interest therein, and shall remain in effect as to each Restricted Unit Lot until such time that each Restricted Unit is sold at Affordable Sales Prices to Eligible Households in accordance with this Agreement and a Resale Restriction Agreement is recorded against the Restricted Unit Lot.

Upon the sale of a Restricted Unit, this Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect as to that Restricted Unit Lot and the Restricted Unit located thereon that has been sold in accordance with this Agreement, provided that the required Resale Restriction Agreement has been recorded against the Restricted Unit Lot.

7. No Subordination. Developer hereby represents, warrants and covenants that with the exception of easements of record, absent the written consent of City which City may grant or withhold in the exercise of its sole discretion, this Agreement shall not be subordinated in priority to any lien (other than those pertaining to taxes or assessments), encumbrance, or other interest in the Restricted Unit Lots in the Project. If at the time this Agreement is recorded, any interest, lien, or encumbrance has been recorded against any of the Restricted Unit Lots in the Project in position superior to this Agreement, upon the request of City, Developer hereby covenants and agrees to promptly undertake all action necessary to clear such matter from title or to subordinate such interest to this Agreement consistent with the intent of and in accordance with this Section 7, and to provide such evidence thereof as City may reasonably request.

8. Binding on Successors; Covenants Run with the Land. Developer hereby subjects the Restricted Unit Lots to the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Agreement. The Parties hereby declare their express intent that the covenants and restrictions set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land pursuant to California Civil Code §1468, and subject to the provisions of Section 9 below, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest, transferees, and assigns of Developer and City, regardless of any sale, assignment, conveyance or transfer of the Restricted Unit Lots or any part thereof or interest therein. So long as this Agreement remains of record, any conveyance of the Restricted Unit Lots shall be conclusively held to have been delivered and accepted subject the requirements set forth in this Agreement, without regard to whether any party to such transaction has actual knowledge of the restrictions hereof. The burden of this Agreement touches and concerns each of the Restricted Units, the Project and the Property in that the restrictions set forth herein may render the owner’s interest therein less valuable, and they enhance and increase the enjoyment and use of the Project, the Property and the Restricted Units by Eligible Purchasers who will benefit from such covenants and restrictions. Developer agrees for itself and for its successors that in the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the covenants herein do not run with the land, such covenants shall be enforced as equitable servitudes against the Property in favor of City.

9. Reconveyance. Concurrently with the sale of each Restricted Unit to an Eligible Purchaser and recordation of the Resale Restriction Agreement and the Performance Deed of Trust, the Parties shall execute and record appropriate instruments to release and reconvey this Agreement as to such Restricted Unit. Such instrument shall be deposited with the escrow holder with instructions to record it concurrently with the close of escrow for the sale of the Restricted Unit to the Eligible Purchaser. Upon the sale of a Restricted Unit, this Agreement shall terminate as to that Restricted Unit and Restricted Unit Lot, provided that the required Resale Restriction has been recorded, and Developer shall be released from all obligations 3070
7 hereunder except those that expressly survive termination. Nothing contained herein shall terminate Developer's obligations if any, with regard to the construction and quality of the Restricted Units, which obligations shall survive the sale of the Restricted Units and shall terminate only as provided by law.

10. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. To the greatest extent permitted by law, Developer will indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by City) and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, contractors, and board members (all of the foregoing, collectively the “Indemnitees”) from and against all liability, loss, cost, expense (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation), claim, demand, action, suit, judicial or administrative proceeding, penalty, deficiency, fine, order, and damage (all of the foregoing collectively “Claims”) arising directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, as a result of or in connection with or relating in any manner to the Property, the Project, the Restricted Units, or Developer's performance or non-performance under this Agreement, except to the extent arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Agreement and the release of part or all of the Property from the burdens of this Agreement.

11. Default; Remedies. In the event of any breach of this Agreement, the non-defaulting Party shall provide written notice of default to the Party in default. If the default is not cured within thirty (30) days after delivery of such notice, or in the case where the default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days and the defaulting party does not diligently and continuously pursue a cure of the default until the default is cured, then the non-defaulting Party shall have the right to take legal or other action to enforce this Agreement, including without limitation, bringing an action for equitable relief seeking the specific performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and/or enjoining, abating, or preventing any violation of such terms and conditions, and/or seeking declaratory relief or damages. Each of the remedies provided herein is cumulative and not exclusive, and each Party may exercise from time to time any rights and remedies available to it under applicable law or in equity, in addition to, and not in lieu of, any rights and remedies expressly provided in this Agreement.

12. Fair Housing; Non-Discrimination. Developer shall comply with all applicable State and federal fair housing laws in the marketing and sale of all residential units in the Project.

Developer shall not restrict the rental, sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property, the Project, or any portion thereof, on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, actual or perceived gender identity, marital status, ancestry, or national origin of any person. Developer covenants for itself and all persons claiming under or through it, and this Agreement is made and accepted upon and subject to the condition that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of Section 12955 of the Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the Government Code, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property or part thereof, nor shall Developer or any person claiming under or through Developer establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in, of, or for the Property or part thereof. Developer shall include such provision in all 3071
8 deeds, leases, contracts and other instruments executed by Developer, and shall enforce the same diligently and in good faith.

13. Mortgagee Protection. No violation of any provision contained herein shall defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value upon all or any portion of the Project or the Property, and the purchaser at any trustee’s sale or foreclosure sale shall not be liable for any violation of any provision hereof occurring prior to the acquisition of title by such purchaser. Such purchaser shall be bound by and subject to this Agreement from and after such trustee’s sale or foreclosure sale.

14. Miscellaneous.

14.1 Notices. Except as otherwise specified herein, all notices to be sent pursuant to this Agreement shall be made in writing, and sent to the Parties at their respective addresses specified below or to such other address as a Party may designate by written notice delivered to the other parties in accordance with this Section. All such notices shall be sent by: (i) personal delivery, in which case notice is effective upon delivery; (ii) certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon receipt if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt; or (iii) nationally recognized overnight courier, with charges prepaid or charged to the sender’s account, in which case notice is effective on delivery if delivery is confirmed by the delivery service.

City:

City of Eastvale
12373 Limonite Ave., Ste. 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Attention: Community Development Director
Developer:
_______________________
_______________________
Attention:________________

14.2 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to be for the benefit of any person other than the Parties and their permitted successors and assigns.

14.3 Attorneys' Fees. If any legal or administrative action is brought to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in such action, including without limitation, attorneys’ fees attributable to City’s in-house counsel based upon comparable fees of private attorneys practicing in Riverside County.

14.4 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, changed, or modified only by an agreement in writing signed by the Parties or their respective permitted successors and recorded in the Official Records.
3072
9 14.5 No Waiver. Any waiver of any term or provision of this Agreement must be in writing. No waiver shall be implied from any delay or failure by a Party to take action on any breach or default hereunder or to pursue any remedy allowed under this Agreement or applicable law. No failure or delay by a Party at any time to require strict performance of any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any election contained herein or any right, power or remedy hereunder shall be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provision hereof or a relinquishment for the future of such election.

14.6 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or illegal, such invalidity or illegality shall not affect, impair or invalidate any other provision hereof, and such remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

14.7 Headings; Interpretation. The captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered in the construction or interpretation of any provision hereof. Unless expressly stated otherwise, each reference to a particular Section of this Agreement shall mean all subsections and subparagraphs of such Section. The language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any Party, notwithstanding the drafting of the Agreement by any Party or Party's representative. All references in this Agreement to particular statutes, regulations, ordinances or resolutions of the United States, the State of California, or the City of Eastvale shall be deemed to include the same statute, regulation, ordinance or resolution as hereafter amended or renumbered, or if repealed, to such other provisions as may thereafter govern the same subject.

14.8 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to principles of conflicts of law. Any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall be filed and heard in the Superior Court of Riverside County, California, or in the Federal District Court for the Central District of California.

14.9 Authority. Each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a Party represents warrants that he or she has the actual authority to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such Party and that the Agreement is binding on such Party.

14.10 Entire Agreement; Exhibits. This Agreement, together with the Conditions of Approval, contains the entire agreement of Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements with respect thereto. Exhibits A through C attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference. The Parties each acknowledge and agree that they have not relied on any representations of the other Parties or their representatives, except to the extent that such representations are expressly set forth herein.

14.11 Further Assurances. Each Party shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other Parties such other documents and instruments, and take such other actions, as either shall reasonably request as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement

14.12 Parties Not Co-Venturers; No Agency Relationship. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or shall establish the Parties as partners, co-venturers, or principal and agent with one 3073
10 another. The relationship of the Parties shall not be construed as a joint venture, equity venture, partnership or any other relationship. City neither undertakes nor assumes any responsibility or duty to Developer (except as expressly provided in this Agreement) or to any third party with respect to the Project. Developer and its agents and employees shall at no time pretend to be or hold themselves out as employees or agents of City, and Developer shall have no authority to act as an agent or to bind City to any obligation.

14.13 Action by the City. Whenever action and/or approval by City is required under this Agreement, such action or approval shall be in writing, and the City’s Authorized Representative or his or her designee may act on and/or approve such matter unless specifically provided otherwise, or the City’s Authorized Representative determines in his or her discretion that such action or approval requires referral to City Council for consideration.

14.14 Non-Liability of City and City Officials, Employees and Agents. No member, official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to Developer or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount of money which may become due to Developer, or their respective successors, or for any obligation of City under this Agreement.

14.15 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES
3074
11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Affordable Housing Agreement effective as of the date first written above.

DEVELOPER:

Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation
_________________________, a [California] ______________________ By:________________________
Print Name:_________________
Title:_______________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: (seal)
[City Signatures on Following Page]
3075
12 City Signature Page to Affordable Housing Agreement
CITY:

CITY OF EASTVALE, a municipal corporation
__________________________
Mark Orme, City Manager
Approved as to form:
__________________________
Erica Vega, City Attorney
Attest:
__________________________
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
3076
13 Exhibit A

PROPERTY
Real property situated in the County of Riverside, City of Eastvale, State of California, and described as follows:

LOTS 11 AND 24 OF TRACT NO. 39416, IN THE CITY OF EASTVALE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP FILED IN BOOK ______ OF MAPS, AT PAGES ______ THROUGH ______, INCLUSIVE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
3077
14 Exhibit B

SITE PLAN
3078
15 Exhibit C

RESTRICTED UNIT SALE PRICES
Affordable Sales Price Very
Low Income Households
Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026
3-Bedroom $110,000.00
The Affordable Sales Price is based upon Area Median Income for the applicable household income category, the unit size, and an affordability percentage. These figures are combined with an estimated total housing payment. Pricing applies to homes sold within the specified fiscal year. Pricing is subject to adjustment. 3079
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39416, AND THE MASTER SITE PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE OF A 35 UNIT

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY, WITH PARKING AREAS,

LANDSCAPING, AND OPEN SPACE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WALTERS STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 144- 070-016, 144-070-017, 144-070-018, AND 144-070-020.

WHEREAS, the Planning Department of the City of Eastvale received an application (PLN26-20102) on December 10, 2025, from Regent Land Company, LLC. (the “Applicant”) requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map 39416, Major Development Review, and a density bonus agreement to allow for the construction of a new 35-unit single family residential community, two (2) of which are proposed as onsite very low-income affordable units with associated parking areas, landscaping, and open space (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the proposed project (Project No. PLN25-20102) is considered a “Project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, review of the proposed project with respect to the proposed uses was evaluated in a Section 15183 Exemption Report and the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No.2022080090), because the implementation of the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed by the General Plan EIR, no additional environmental review beyond a Section 15183 Exemption Report is necessary; however, a Notice of Exemption will be filed following any action taken on the project; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) provides that “a proposed housing development project is not inconsistent with the applicable zoning standards and criteria, and shall not require a rezoning, if the housing development project is consistent with the objective general plan standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the general plan.” In such cases, the local agency may require the proposed housing development project to comply with the objective standards and criteria of the zoning district that is consistent with the general plan; and
WHEREAS, the R-1 (One Family Dwelling) zoning designation is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the property of Single-Family Low and the objective standards and criteria applicable within the R-1 district will apply to the project as those standards existed on October 9, 2025, the date an SB 330 preliminary application for the Project was submitted; and
3080
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed for a 22.5% Density Bonus per Section 120.05.090(b)(2) and (d)(1)(b) of the Eastvale Municipal Code by setting aside at least six percent (6%) of the total units before the density bonus is granted within the project for very-low income households. The California Density Bonus law (Government Code section 65915) allows developers whose projects qualify for a density bonus to request the city waive any development standards that “will have the effect of physically precluding the construction” of the project at the density permitted by the Density Bonus Law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to set aside two (2) of the 29 base density units permitted under the General Plan density for the 3.57 acre site for purchase by very low income households, making the project eligible for a 22.5% increase in density, or up to 35 units on the

3.57 acre site. The developer has requested nine development standard waivers (i.e., lot size, lot width, lot depth, side interior setback, side street setback, fence height, street width, Residential Design Guideline No. 7); and
WHEREAS, the State Density Bonus law does not provide the City with discretion to deny a density bonus request if that request is consistent with the requirements of the State Density Bonus law, and a request to waive development standards that physically preclude the construction of the project can only be denied if “the waiver or reduction would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact”; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2026, the City of Eastvale City Clerk published a legal notice in compliance with state law concerning PLN25-20102 in the Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, regarding the Planning Commission meeting on May 20, 2026. In addition, on May 7, 2026, a public hearing notice was also mailed to commercial tenants and residents within a 600-foot radius of the projects site indicating time, date, and place of the public hearing for PLN25-20102; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on May 20, 2026, at which time it received public testimony concerning Project No.

PLN25-20102 and considered the proposed Tentative Tract Map, Major Development Review for the master site planning and architecture of the Project and density bonus agreement and recommended that the City Council disapprove the Project; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 2026, the City of Eastvale City Clerk published a legal notice in compliance with state law concerning PLN25-20102 in the Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, regarding the City Council meeting on June 24, 2026. In addition, on June 11, 2026, a public hearing notice was also mailed to commercial tenants and residents within a 600- foot radius of the projects site indicating time, date, and place of the public hearing for PLN25- 20102; and
3081
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 24, 2026, at which time it received public testimony concerning Project No. PLN25-20102 and considered the proposed Tentative Tract Map, Major Development Review for the master site planning and architecture of the Project and Density Bonus Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, including Public Resources Code Sections 21080(e) and 21082.2, and based on the record and/or as provided at the public hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the project was adequately analyzed according to the CEQA Guidelines, as supported by the following Findings and Evidence:

Finding 1: The proposed project is exempt from further environmental review requirements.

Evidence: Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183, because implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts that are peculiar to the project site and the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed by the General Plan EIR (SCH # 2022080090), no additional environmental review beyond a Section 15183 Exemption Report is required for the proposed project. A Section 15183 Exemption Report was prepared for the project supporting this conclusion, a copy of which is included in the record for this project and incorporated herein by reference. As such, no further CEQA documentation would be warranted for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39416 Pursuant to Eastvale Municipal Code Section 130.12.190, the staff report dated June 24, 2026, and all evidence and testimony heard at the public hearing of this item, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:

Finding 1: Tentative Tract Map No. 39416 is consistent with the City’s General Plan and any applicable specific plan as specified in Government Code Section 65451.

Evidence: The proposed project and its design and improvements will be consistent with the Chandler Policy Area designation of the General Plan and are otherwise consistent with all other elements of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The proposed subdivision of land will create 35 single family residential lots, two (2) open space lots, and four (4) lots for street purposes consistent with the various provisions of the General Plan. While 35 units exceeds the density permitted on 3082
the site under the General Plan, the project is utilizing the State of California’s Density Bonus Law to allow for an increase in density of up to a twenty-two and a half percent (22.5%). The maximum unit yield for the 3.57-acre site using the Single-Family Low General Plan density and the State density bonus is 35 units, and the applicant is proposing to develop 35 units on the site; therefore, the tentative map reflects the allowable density under Density Bonus Law.

Finding 2: The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

Evidence: The proposed project is designed to meet all City standards applicable to residential development within the Single-Family Low land use designation and R1 zoning district, except where a waiver is being granted pursuant to the State Density Bonus law, including street widths, drainage, utilities, lot size and configuration, grading, required dedications and providing satisfactory pedestrian and vehicular circulation, emergency vehicle access and on- and off-site public improvements.

Finding 3: The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development. The proposed site consists of approximately 3.57-acres of land and is physically suitable for the proposed development, where access to the site will be from Walters Street and Hellman Avenue. The current General Plan land use designation of the project site is Chandler Policy Area, which applies to residential areas characterized by single-family housing. The General Plan density would allow up to 8 dwelling units per acres (du/ac). The proposed density is 9.8 du/ac, which would be permitted through Density Bonus Law through a separate density bonus agreement. The proposed density is below the Density Bonus Law provisions in the California Density Bonus Law for low-income projects (22.5 percent density bonus) which allows 9.8 du/ac on the project site. The applicant has submitted a conceptual development plan which illustrates that single-family dwelling units can be constructed on this 3.57-acre site without adversely affecting the health, safety, or welfare of anyone who will live within the development or anyone living within the surrounding community. Further, the infrastructure and utilities either already serve the site or can be readily expanded to serve the site, and there are no intractable topographical peculiarities associated with the physical character of the property that may prevent the development of thirty-five (35) lots with single family dwellings, two (2) for open space purposes and four (4) for street purposes.

Finding 4: The design of the subdivision or proposed improvements is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
3083
Evidence: A Biological Resources assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Determination dated February 2026 were prepared for the proposed project. In said document no sensitive vegetation communities, potentially jurisdictional areas, special-status plant species or MSHCP riparian/riverine areas were observed on site. Further no Burrowing Owel were observed. Portions of the project site and the immediate surrounding area provide suitable habitat for nesting birds although no nesting birds were observed on site. However, site development conditions such as biological resource monitoring, preconstruction nesting bird surveys, preconstruction Burrowing Owl surveys, and implementing best management practices were identified and conditioned on the project to avoid or mitigate any potential significant effects on the environment to a point below the threshold of significance. As conditioned, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Finding 5: The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

Evidence: The design of the subdivision is in conformance with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision Ordinance to the extent permitted under the HAA and State Density Bonus Law. Accordingly, the subdivision and improvements will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws to ensure the public’s general health, safety, and welfare
Finding 6: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

Evidence: The design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Upon review of the project by the Engineering Division, there is no, known conflict with any easements, or right-ofways an all in-tract streets are to be private streets with access easements for emergency personnel only.

SECTION 3. FINDINGS FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLN24-20053 Pursuant to Section 120.02.010(c)(6) of the Eastvale Municipal Code, and in light of the record before it, including the staff report dated June 24, 2026, and all evidence and testimony heard at the public hearing of this item, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:

Finding 1: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the general Plan and complies with applicable zoning regulations, specific plan provisions, special 3084
planning area provisions, design guidelines, and improvement standards adopted by the city.

Evidence: The General Plan land use designation of the proposed site is Single Family-low.

The Single Family-Low land use designation allows for the development of singlefamily residential development with a maximum density of eight (8) dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan designation for the site with the application of State Density Bonus Law and will further the objectives of the General Plan. Finally, the proposed project would be consistent with the surrounding area and is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning to the extent permittable under the provisions of the HAA and State Density Bonus law.

Finding 2: The proposed architecture, site design, and landscape are suitable for the purposes of the building and site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Evidence: The proposed project has been designed to conform to the logical pattern of development as envisioned by the Eastvale General Plan and has been designed to satisfy the General Plan design policies. The project has been designed with high-quality urban design, architecture and landscaping that includes landscape streetscapes, three architectural styles (i.e., Cottage, Farmhouse, Monterey), and connectivity between existing street networks for pedestrian and bicyclists.

Finally, the project has been designed to meet the requirements and development standards of the Eastvale Zoning Code to the extent permitted under the HAA and State Density Bonus law. For these reasons, the proposed project, as conditioned will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Finding 3: The architecture, including the character, scale, and quality of design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting, and signing and similar elements, establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of buildings on adjoining and nearby properties.

Evidence: The architectural theme of the proposed single-family residential units are consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods in terms of character, scale, and quality to the extent allowed under the HAA and State Density Bonus law. These standards focus on high quality design and articulation to provide visual interest and variety. The buildings include board and batten, shutters, flower boxes, decorative vents and exterior lights as examples of variation of materials designed to complement the exterior plaster and building finishes. Thus, the proposed design is consistent with the Eastvale Zoning Code and the General Plan.

Finding 4: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation.
3085
Evidence: The proposed project is conditioned to ensure adequate circulation to and from the site. All streets have been designed to handle the type and quantity of vehicular traffic associated with the proposed project. As conditioned, the project will include sidewalks and pedestrian and bicycle connections that will not create conflicts with motorized vehicles. Rondo Elementary School is located across Walters Street directly south of the project site, providing convenient, walkable access for school-aged children within the proposed development to get to school.

However, Walters Street is currently impacted with significant vehicular traffic and queuing during peak drop-off and pick-up times and there is concern that queuing may spill into the project site upon completion, creating additional conflicts and impacting future residents. To help minimize this concern, the applicant will install No Parking, vehicles subject to tow signage to discourage queuing. The City Engineer, Riverside County Sheriff’s, and Fire Department have reviewed the proposed project access and on-site circulation design and do not have any concerns about the project itself.

Finding 5: The proposed project is consistent with the most recently adopted version of the Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.

Evidence: The project has been reviewed for consistency with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The project is located within the Chino Airport Influence Area Zone D. No limitations and prohibited uses related to the proposed project were identified.

SECTION 4. STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW
Pursuant to Section 120.05.090 of the Eastvale Municipal Code and the State Density Bonus law, and in light of the record before it, including the staff report dated June 24, 2026, and all evidence and testimony heard at the public hearing of this item, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the project as proposed satisfies the eligibility criteria for a 22.5% density increase by setting aside at least 6% of the base density units permitted prior to the density bonus for very-low income households, and that the six (6) requested development standard waivers would not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.

SECTION 5. MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) The project is found to be consistent with the MSHCP. The project is located outside of any MSHCP criteria area, and mitigation is provided through payment of the MSHCP Mitigation Fee.

SECTION 6. RECORD OF PROCEEDING
3086
The documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision is based, which include but are not limited to the staff reports as well as all materials that support the staff reports for the proposed project, are located in the City Clerk’s office of the City of Eastvale at 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752.

The custodian of these documents is the City Clerk of the City of Eastvale.

SECTION 7. DETERMINATION
Based upon the findings outlined in Sections 1 through 5, the City Council of the City of Eastvale hereby approves the following for the Project:
a. A density bonus of 22.5% and the six (6) requested waivers of development standards pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law, and the form of an agreement between the City and Applicant ensuring the affordability of the two (2) units that qualified the Project for said density bonus and development standard waivers;
b. Tentative Tract Map 39416 to subdivide four (4) existing residential lots totally

3.57 acres into 35 single family residential lots with two (2) of the residential units proposed as affordable to very-low income, two (2) lots for open spaces purposes, and four (4) lots for street purposes, subject to the conditions of approval attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
c. Major Development Review approving the master site planning and architecture of the new residential community inclusive of parking, landscaping, and open space for the project site located at APNs: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144-070-018, and 144-070-020, subject to the conditions of approval attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24
th day of June, 2026.
________________________________
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
____________________________ ________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
3087

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE)
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 26-XX, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 24 th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
3088
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 30

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application Number and Description: Project No. 25-20102 –Tentative Tract Map No. 39416 allows to subdivide four (4) existing residential lots totaling 3.57 acres into 35 residential lots, two (2) for open space purposes and four (4) for street purposes. The project site is generally located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street.

Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144070-018, and 144-070-020 City Council Approval Date:

Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
General Conditions

1. The applicant shall review and sign below verifying the “Acceptance of the Conditions of Approval” and return the signed page to the Eastvale Planning Department. Project approval is not final until a signed copy of these conditions is filed with the City.

Applicant Signature Date
Must be
completed to
finalize approval
Planning
Division

2. In compliance with Section 15075 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, a Notice of Determination (NOE) shall be filed with the Riverside County Clerk within five (5) days of project approval. The NOE shall include the required California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (Code Section 711.4.d.3) fee and the Riverside County Clerk administrative fee.

Five (5) days
from project
approval
Planning
Division

3. Protest. The applicant may protest any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed by the City on the project in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 66020 and Eastvale Municipal Code Section 110.28.050(D). Any protest of the above impact fees, or any other fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed by the City on the project through PLN25-20102 Within 90 days
from project
approval
Building
Division
3089
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
must be filed within 90-days of the date of this conditional approval of PLN25-20102.

Deferral of payment to final inspection or certificate of occupancy. The applicant may elect to defer payment of impact fees to the date of the final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first, in accordance with Government Code Section 66007 and Eastvale Municipal Code section 110.28.050(B). If the applicant elects to defer payment pursuant to Section 66007, the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro rata basis for each dwelling when it receives its final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first.

Audit and Notice. In accordance with Government Code Section 66006(e), the Applicant is hereby notified of the right to file with the City Clerk: (a) a request for an audit of the City’s development impact fees in accordance with Government Code Section 66023; and (b) a written request for mailed notices of the City’s public meetings to review annual reports of development impact fees under Government Code Section 66006(b)(1).

4. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, from any and all claims, demands, law suits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, Ongoing Planning
Division
3090
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul any action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under CEQA, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense and that applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action.

5. Tentative Tract Map 39416 is granted for a period of two years, until June 24, 2028, at which time said Map shall expire unless prior to the expiration date, either the final map has recorded or a written request for time extension, accompanied by the appropriate fee, is received by the Planning Division.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

6. Any approval shall not be final until and unless the applicant's deposit account with Public Works has a balance of at least $10,000 to cover staff time to follow-up, monitoring, and other post-approval work by staff. The City reserves the right to request additional deposits to cover post-approval staff work and to half work if the deposit account is exhausted.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

7. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the plans approved by the City Council and on file with the Community Development Ongoing Planning
Division
3091
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
Department. The applicant shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. Deviations not identified on the plans may not be approved by the City, potentially resulting in the need for the project to be redesigned. Amended entitlement approvals may be necessary as a result.

8. All applicable Major Development Review conditions of approval (PLN25-20102) shall be incorporated herein by reference.

Ongoing Planning
Division

9. Final lot configurations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior to recordation of any portion of Tentative Tract Map 39416.

Ongoing Planning &
Public Works
Divisions

10. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all other applicable City ordinances and development standards in effect at the time of the SB 330 submittal on October 9, 2025.

Ongoing Planning,
Public Works,
and Building
Divisions

11. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of SB 330. Ongoing Planning Division

12. This project is subject to compliance with Jurupa Community Services District’s rules, regulations, conditions, requirements, and payment of appropriate fees.

Ongoing Jurupa
Community
Services
District

13. Remove all graffiti within 24 hours pre-construction, during construction, and after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

14. Provide street sweeping services for onsite and offsite within project frontages weekly.

Ongoing Public Works
Department
3092
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

15. A City of Eastvale Encroachment Permit is required for any improvements within the public right-of-way.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

16. All street cuts for utilities shall be repaired in accordance with City Standard or as recommended; and any interim trench repairs shall consist of compacted backfill to the bottom of the pavement structural section followed by placement of standard base course material in accord by the City Engineer and with the Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction (“Greenbook”). The base course material shall be placed the full height of the structural section to be flush with the existing pavement surface and provide a smooth pavement surface until permanent cap paving occurs using an acceptable surface course material.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

17. In accordance with City's Moratorium policy to preserve newly paved streets, any and all street and/or trench cuts in newly paved streets will be prohibited or be subject to moratorium street repair standards as reference in Section 12.08.260 of the Eastvale Municipal Code.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

18. Any and all utility trenches or other excavations within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets resulting from the proposed development shall be backfilled and repaired in accordance with City of Eastvale Standard Drawings. The developer shall be responsible for removing, grinding, paving and/or overlaying existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets including pavement repairs in addition to pavement repairs made by utility companies for utilities installed for the benefit of the proposed development (i.e. Jurupa Community Services District, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, Time Warner, Verizon, etc.). Multiple excavations, trenches, and other street cuts within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets resulting from the proposed development may require complete grinding Ongoing Public Works
Department
3093
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
and asphalt concrete overlay of the affected off-site streets, at the discretion of the City Engineer. The pavement condition of the existing off-site streets shall be returned to a condition equal to or better than what existed prior to construction of the proposed development.

19. Construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be provided during all phases of construction in accordance with City Standards and the direction of the City Engineer. As a minimum, all construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with Part 6 “Temporary Traffic Control” of the latest California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, or subsequent editions in force at the time of construction.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

20. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, consulting tribe(s), and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation, include the following.

The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated.

2. Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed.

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
During
Construction
Planning
Division
3094
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

3. In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the City at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The City must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a research design and data recovery program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the City before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the County coroner and City shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains.

4. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist in consultation with the consulting tribe(s) shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis.
3095
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

21. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a cultural resources discovery:

1. Preservation-in-place. Avoidance, or preservation-in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources.

2. Reburial on the project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Final Monitoring Report (refer to SDC CUL-6).

3. If preservation-in-place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets the Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (California Office of Historic Preservation 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
During
Construction
Planning
Division
Prior to Grading Permit
3096
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

22. The developer shall prepare an address blocking exhibit with the proposed addressing and street names for review and approval by the Planning Division. This plan, including updates to the plan, shall include addressing for buildings (primary address and units) and utilities such as but not limited to electrical/water/single/dual irrigation meter pedestal(s) or temporary power poles.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

23. Street names shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Suggested street names and alternatives shall be submitted in writing to the Community Development Director for approval. Phonic similarity with existing street names should be avoided.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning and
Building
Divisions

24. Prior to ground disturbances that would impact potentially suitable nesting habitat for avian species, the project applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common, migratory, and special status) regardless of the time of year during the nesting season, a qualified avian biologist retained by the project applicant will conduct pre‐construction Nesting Bird Surveys within three (3) days prior to project‐related disturbance within the entire project site and a 300-foot buffer around the project site at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows and cavities. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required.

2. If a nest is suspected, but not confirmed, the qualified avian biologist shall establish a disturbance-free buffer until additional surveys can be completed prior to the commencement of ground disturbing project activities. If an active nest is found, the qualified avian biologist will set appropriate no‐work buffers around the nest which will Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division
3097
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. If a nest is observed, but thought to be inactive, the qualified avian biologist shall monitor the nest for one hour (four hours for raptors) prior to approaching the nest to determine status. The qualified avian biologist shall not risk failure of the nest to determine the exact location or status and shall make every effort to limit the nest to potential predation as a result of the survey/monitoring efforts (e.g., limit number of surveyors, limit time spent at/near the nest, scan the site for potential nest predators before approaching, immediately depart nest area if indicators of stress or agitation are displayed). The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird. The qualified avian biologist shall use their best professional judgement regarding the monitoring period and whether approaching the nest is appropriate. The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked daily weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no‐work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.

25. In accordance with MSHCP species-specific objective #6 for burrowing owl, a preconstruction survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance by a qualified biologist where suitable habitat is present within the study area (project site and surrounding 500-foot buffer). If active burrowing owl burrows are detected during the breeding season (March 1 through August 31), all work within 300 feet of any active burrow will be halted until that nesting effort is finished as determined by a qualified biologist. Work can resume when no other active burrowing owl nesting efforts are observed. If active burrowing owl burrows are detected outside the breeding season Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division
3098
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
(September 1 through February 28), then a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and approved by the County of Riverside Environmental Programs Department in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan shall be prepared in accordance with guidelines in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl (2012) and the MSHCP, which allows for passive relocation (i.e., use of one-way doors and collapse of burrows). Burrowing owl burrows shall be excavated with hand tools by a qualified biologist when determined to be unoccupied and backfilled to prevent reentry.

26. To ensure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the proposed project will adhere to MSHCP Appendix C, Standard Best Management Practices.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written verification that a qualified archaeologist has been retained to develop and implement a Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan (CRMP).

The CRMP shall address the details of all monitoring activities and procedures to be followed to reduce the impacts to cultural and historic resources to a less than significant level as well as addressing potential impacts to undiscovered buried archaeological resources associated with this project. The CRMP shall be reviewed by any consulting tribe(s) and reviewed and approved by the City.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

28. The project applicant shall provide for Native American monitoring during grading. The Native American monitor(s) shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The City shall coordinate with the Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division
3099
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
consulting tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the project developer/applicant so that all parties can develop a mutually acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement, which will include the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual consulting tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries.

29. The project archaeologist and the consulting tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager, and any contractors, and will conduct a mandatory cultural resources worker sensitivity training. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project site and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earth-moving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event that inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

30. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City that the project applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to develop and implement a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) to guide monitoring procedures and establish protocols to follow in the event of a fossil discovery. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre-grading conference, shall describe procedures for paleontological resource surveillance, including monitoring of all earth-moving operations that extend beyond two feet below the existing ground surface, and shall establish in the PRIMP, in cooperation with the project applicant and City, procedures for temporarily halting or Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division
3100
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. The monitor should be prepared to quickly salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and should collect samples of sediments that are likely to contain fossil remains of small vertebrates or invertebrates. The monitor shall also have the authority to temporarily halt or divert grading equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. Sediment samples collected during monitoring shall be processed to recover small fossil remains, and all recovered specimens shall be identified and curated in a repository that provides permanent, retrievable storage. If the paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project applicant, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage.

31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the Developer shall pay all necessary fees as determined by the City Engineer including, but not limited to Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP") fees and grading permit fees.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

32. Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will required performance security to be posted with the City.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

33. A permit for the hauling of material to and from the project site shall be submitted to the City for approval.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

34. Submit a California registered Civil Engineer prepared earthwork cut and fill certification letter to the Engineering Division for review. If the required earthwork in cubic yards is 50 CY or less, a Precise Grading/Paving Plan will not be required; however, the applicant is required to pull an NPDES/Public Works permit prior to issuance of a Building Permit for record purposes.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
3101
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 14 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

35. The Rough Grading and Precise Grading/Paving Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City of Eastvale Grading handout and City Engineer approved prior to issuance of grading permits.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

36. Development of the site is subject to the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit for the City of Eastvale, under the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Board Order No. R8-2010-0036. Pursuant to the NPDES Permit, the developer shall ensure development of the site incorporates postconstruction Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) in accordance with the Model Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”) approved for use for the Santa Ana River Watershed. The developer is advised that applicable Site Design BMPs will be required to be incorporated into the final site design, pursuant to a site specific WQMP submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The site specific WQMP shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval with the Precise Grading/Paving Plan.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

37. Prior to commencing with any grading, the required erosion and dust control measures shall be in place. In addition, the following shall be included if not already identified:
a. 6 foot high tan colored perimeter screened fencing
b. Contractor information signage including contact information along the street frontage.
c. Post dust control signage with the following verbiage: “Project Name, WDID No., IF YOU SEE DUST COMING FROM THIS PROJECT
CALL: NAME (XXX) XXX-XXX, If you do not receive a response, please call the AQMD at 1-800-CUT-SMOG/1-800-228-7664”
Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

38. A Notice of Intent ("NOI") to comply with the California General Construction Stormwater Permit is required via the California Regional Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
3102
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 15 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
Water Quality Control Board online Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System ("SMARTS"). A copy of the executed letter issuing a Waste Discharge Identification ("WDID") number shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Construction General Permit requires the Developer’s contractor to prepare and maintain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”). The SWPPP requires all appropriate measures be implemented to prevent erosion and water pollution during construction.

39. A California registered Geotechnical Engineer prepared Geotechnical/Soils Report shall be required for and incorporated as an integral part of the grading/paving plan for the proposed development.

A copy of the Geotechnical/Soils Report shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the first submittal of the Precise Grading/Paving Plan.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

40. All stormwater runoff passing through the site shall be accepted and conveyed across the property in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. All on-site City Engineer approved retention or other facilities are required to contain the increase stormwater runoff generated from the proposed development. Provide a hydrology study to determine the volume of increased stormwater runoff due to development of the site, and to determine required stormwater runoff mitigation measures for the proposed development. The City Engineer must approve the final retention basin sizing and other stormwater runoff mitigation measures determined upon review and approval of the hydrology and may require redesign or changes to site configuration or layout consistent with the findings of the final hydrology study. The existing “pre-developed” condition compared to the proposed “developed” condition shall be used to calculate the volume of increased stormwater runoff to retain on-site under the 100- year frequency storm.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
3103
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 16 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

41. Direct release of on-site nuisance water or stormwater runoff shall not be permitted to the adjacent public streets. Provisions for the interception of nuisance water from entering adjacent public streets from the project site shall be provided through the use of a minor storm drain system that collects and conveys nuisance water to landscape or parkway areas, and in only a stormwater runoff condition, pass runoff directly to the streets through parkway or under sidewalk drains.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

42. If the existing irrigation well will not be used as part of the redevelopment, it shall be properly decommissioned prior to grading activities. Well abandonment shall be performed in accordance with all applicable state and local regulatory requirements.

Prior to Grading
Permit Issuance
Planning and
Building
Divisions
Prior to Map Recordation

43. TTM No. 39416 is approved as shown on the Tentative Map submitted to the Planning Division and as approved by the APPROVING AUTHORITY, subject to conditions of approval and the City of Eastvale Municipal Code, as applicable.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Planning
Division

44. The applicant shall enter into a Density Bonus Agreement with the City of Eastvale, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Planning
Division

45. Lots 11 and 24 of TTM 39416 shall be identified as affordable unit lots reserved for the Very-Low Income category.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Planning
Division

46. The applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the city and shall guarantee by posting security(ies) to include all public improvements that the developer is conditioned to construct as part of this approval.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Public Works
Department

47. Dedicate City Engineer approved additional right-of-way along the entire frontage as may be required to provide a property line at ultimate Prior to Map Public Works
Department
3104
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 17 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
right-of-way in accordance with the City General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and/or as requested by the City Engineer.

Recordation

48. A Tract Map shall be prepared by a California registered Land Surveyor or qualified Civil Engineer and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. A Title Report prepared for subdivision guarantee for the subject property, the traverse closures for the existing parcel and all lots created therefrom, and copies of record documents shall be submitted with the Tract Map to the Engineering Division as part of the review of the Map. The Tract Map shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Public Works
Department

49. Monument bond shall be posted with the City. Prior to Map Recordation
Public Works
Department
Prior to Encroachment Permit Issuance

50. The minimum pavement section for all on-site pavements shall be 3 inches asphalt concrete pavement over 6 inches crushed aggregate base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal. The pavement section shall be determined using appropriate Traffic Index (“TI”) accepted by the City Engineer. A California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall design the pavement section using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval.

Prior to
Encroachment
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

51. Traffic Control Plan prepared by a California registered Civil Engineer or Traffic Engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.

Prior to
Encroachment
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
Prior to Building Permit Issuance
3105
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 18 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

52. Major Development Review shall be accomplished for development of Tentative Tract Map 39416.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

53. A Final Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the City prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Final Monitoring Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting tribe(s).

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

54. If paleontological resources are uncovered and after completion of the project, the project applicant shall submit the paleontologist’s follow-up report for approval by the City. The report shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and the present repository of the fossils. The project applicant shall prepare excavated material to the point of identification. The project applicant shall offer excavated finds for curatorial purposes to the City or its designee, on a first refusal basis. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to approval by the City. The project applicant shall make a one-time payment of curatorial fees for the storage of these resources in perpetuity.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

55. Prior to any demolition, grading, or off site disposal of debris, the project shall be conditioned to require that all discarded building materials be evaluated for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. If ACMs are identified, they shall be handled, removed, and disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor following all regulatory Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning and
Building
Division
3106
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 19 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
requirements.

56. The MDR has approved the overall architectural styles and enhanced elevations at specific location as identified on the site plan for each planning area. During plan check, the City may request minor adjustments/enhancements to limited aspects of the architectural details, without wholesale changes to the architectural style.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

57. Construction and architectural detailing shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, including but not necessarily limited to elevation drawings and material/colors sample board submitted as a part of this application and as approved by the City Council, except that any modification shall be subject to the discretion of the Community Development Director upon finding that any changes are comparable in substance and quality to the original approval.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

58. The applicant shall provide evidence that a good faith effort was made to enter into an agreement with the property owners of 7483, 7471, 7459, 7447, 7435, and 7423 Silver Saddle Court for the removal of their existing tract perimeter fencing (rear fence) and the construction of a new shared tract perimeter fence (rear fence) in conjunction with the development of project PLN25-20102. In the event that said one or more owners refuse to enter into such agreement, the applicant shall construct the eastern perimeter fence as shown within the development plans for PLN25-20102. Should the latter occur, the applicant shall utilize measures to ensure proper weed abatement occurs between the two parallel perimeter fences so as to prevent any vegetation from growing between the two fences.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

59. This project shall be subject to applicable school fees, the payment of which shall be documented to the satisfaction of the Building Official.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Building
Division and
3107
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 20 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
Corona Norco
Unified
School
District

60. Fire protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow- Minimum fire flow for the construction of all buildings is required per CFC Appendix B. A reduction of up to 50% in the required fire flow is permitted for buildings equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance with the City Municipal Code. Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. On-site water supply must be available and operational before any combustible materials are placed on the construction site. Specific design features may increase or decrease the required fire flow.
a. Will Serve Letters from the responsible water purveyor are required prior to map recordation.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

61. Fire Protection Water Supplies/Hydrants- The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with CFC Appendix C and NFPA 24. Fire hydrants shall be located no more than 600 feet from all portions of the exterior of the building along an approved route on a fire apparatus access road, unless otherwise approved by the fire department. IN areas where new water mains are extended along streets and hydrants are not needed for protection of structures, standard fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet along streets for transportation hazards.

Fire hydrants shall be at least 40 feet from the building they are serving.

A fire hydrant shall be located within 20 to 100 feet of the fire department connection for buildings protected with a fire sprinkler system. The size and number of outlets required for the approved fire Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3108
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 21 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
hydrants are 4” x 2 ½” (Standard Hydrant Reference CFC as amended and NFPA 24.

62. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall route a copy of the Water Improvement Plans (Offsite) to the Fire Department for review of hydrant placement only. Water Improvement Plans (Offsite) will not be reviewed or approved for the installation of onsite Private Fire Service Mains, private hydrants, or fire sprinkler system supplies. The installing contractor shall submit a separate set of working plans designed in accordance with NFPA13 and NFPA 24 to the Fire Department for a permit to install private water mains. a. Building permits shall not be released prior to the approval of the offsite (JCSD Water Plans) in addition, an approved Fire Water Source and approved Fire Apparatus Access Inspection shall be required prior to Building permit issuance
Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

63. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall route a copy of the Water Improvement Plans (offsite) to the Fire Department for review of hydrant placement only. Water Improvement Plans (offsite) will not be reviewed or approved for the installation of onsite Private Fire Service Mains, private hydrants, or fire sprinkler system supplies. The private fire service main installing contractor shall submit a separate set of working plans designed in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 24 to the Fire Department for a permit to install private water mains.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

64. Fire apparatus access roads shall be at least 24 feet wide and comply with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided within 150 feet of all exterior portions of buildings, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3109
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 22 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
Department. Access roads shall not have a grade more than 16% and shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80,000 pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. Unless otherwise approved, the grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 16 percent and the cross slope shall not exceed 2.5 percent. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be a maximum of 6 percent grade change for 25 feet of approach/departure.

Fire apparatus access roads shall have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Road base without an appropriate topping or binding material does not satisfy the all-weather requirement. a. Fire Lane Marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signage, shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department Standards.

65. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads more than 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus.

Reference CFC 503.1.1, 503.2.1 as amended by the County of Riverside and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Guideline OFM-01A.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

66. Inside and Outside Turning Radii- The minimum inside turning radius for an access road shall be 24 feet. The minimum outside turning radius shall be 48 feet. As fire apparatus are unable to negotiate tight “S” curves, a 60-foot straight leg must be provided between these types of compound-turns or the radii and/or road width must be increased accordingly.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

67. Traffic Calming Devices are prohibited. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
3110
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 23 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Reference CFC 503.4.1
Department

68. Fire and Life Safety Requirements- Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews any subsequent submittals. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code (CFC), California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted and amended at the time of construction plan. Submittal.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

69. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or developer shall include in the building plans the required fire lanes and include the appropriate lane printing and/or signs.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

70. Secondary Access- Unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department, dead end fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 1,320 feet.

Secondary egress/access fire apparatus access roads shall provide independent egress/access from/to the area or as other wise approved by the Fire Department. Secondary egress/access fire apparatus access roads shall be as remote as practical from the primary fire apparatus access road to reduce the possibility that both routes will be obstructed by a single emergency. Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access may be required by the Fire Department. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

71. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Fire Department for review and approval prior to final building permit Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
3111
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 24 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
issuance or commencement of landscape installation. The plans shall demonstrate that all trees, shrubs, palms, and other vegetation at mature size will not obstruct fire department laddering access, aerial apparatus operations, roof access or fire apparatus reach to any portion of the buildings.

Department
and Planning
Division

72. Gate Access: All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. These gates shall be provided with access to gate equipment or another method to open the gate if there is a power failure. A Pedestrian gate, if used to provide access, shall be a minimum 3 feet wide and provided with a Knox Box/Padlock if locked. Reference CFC 506.1.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

73. Phase construction fire access shall comply with Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Guideline OFM-01A. Construction Phasing Plan shall be submitted and reviewed prior to building permit release for each phase of construction.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

74. Residential Fire Sprinklers: Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and be approved prior to installation. Reference CRC.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

75. New Motorized gates shall be provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicles in accordance with the Riverside County Standards and policies. The system shall be compatible, but not limited to the detection of the following manufacturers of emergency vehicle preemption: Federal Signal, Whelen, and Tomar. These gates shall be provided with access to gate equipment or another method to open the gate if there is a power failure. (Manual gates shall not be locked unless a Knox padlock or Knox Box Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3112
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 25 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
containing the key the lock is installed in an approved location on the approach side of the gate). A pedestrian gate, if used to provide access, shall be a minimum 3 feet wide and provided with a Knox Box/Padlock if locked. Upon installation of the system, compliance testing shall be completed by the Riverside County Fire Department. (RVC Amendment to CFC 503.6.1).

76. The location of address numbers shall be indicated on the building plans.

Street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street or fire apparatus access side of buildings. Numbers and letters shall be a minimum of 12” in height with a minimum stroke of .05 inch. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from a public way, a monument pole or other sign shall be used to identify the structure in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01-A. Address must be legible, of a contrasting color, and illuminated either internally or externally to be visible from the street at all hours.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

77. Provide specific fire department conditions on plans for building permit submittal.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department

78. Any future monumentation into the development shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and City Traffic Engineer.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

79. Submit California registered civil engineer prepared street improvement plans to the Engineering Division for review and approval. Unless otherwise approved, the street improvement plans shall be approved concurrently with any street light, landscape and irrigation, and traffic signal plans.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
3113
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 26 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

80. Submit California registered civil engineer or traffic engineer prepared traffic striping and signage plans for review and approval. All required traffic thermoplastic striping and signage improvements shall be completed concurrently with street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

81. Submit photometric of street lighting. All lights shall be Edison LS-3 tariff and utilize General Electric Evolve LED luminaires per City Specifications. The developer shall be responsible for applying with Southern California Edison (“SCE”) for all appropriate service points and electrical meters early in the process to avoid delays. The developer must pay for the electrical service of new meter pedestals installed until such time the improvements have been accepted and the underlying property is annexed into LMD/CFD.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

82. The public street improvements outlined in these conditions of approval are intended to convey to the developer an accurate scope of required improvements; however, the City Engineer reserves the right to require reasonable additional improvements as may be determined in the course of the review and approval of street improvement plans required herein.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

83. Provide pad elevation certifications for all building pads in conformance with the approved Precise Grading Plan to the Engineering Division prior to construction of any building foundation.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

84. The developer shall connect to the JCSD sewer system and apply for a sewer connection account with JCSD.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department

85. Submit California registered civil engineer prepared sewer improvement plans to the JCSD/Engineering Division. The plans shall be JCSD approved prior to issuance of any building permits.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
3114
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 27 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

86. The developer is advised that domestic water service is provided by JCSD. The developer shall be responsible for coordinating with JCSD and complying with all requirements for establishing domestic water service to the property.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Public Works
Department
Prior to Certificate Occupancy

87. Applicant shall participate in the final adopted program with regards to providing a non-potable water supply source and related infrastructure improvements for parks and green belt areas.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
JCSD

88. The applicant shall provide and install City-approved signage indicating “No Street Parking – Vehicles Subject to Towing.” Such signage shall be maintained in good condition for the life of the project and shall be located to ensure visibility to all users and visitors.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Division

89. All parkway landscaping shall be guaranteed for a period of one (1) year from the date of the City Engineer acceptance. Any landscaping that fails during the one (1) year landscape maintenance period shall be replaced with similar plant material to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and shall be subject to subsequent one (1) year landscape maintenance period.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

90. A WQMP and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be required, obligating the property owner(s) to appropriate operation and maintenance obligations of on-site BMPs constructed pursuant to the approved WQMP. The WQMP and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit and shall be Public Works Staff recorded at the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
3115
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 28 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

91. The development shall be annexed into all applicable CFD and/or LMD for traffic signals, street lights, full capture systems for all storm drains and landscape maintenance of raised landscape median and public parkways, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or otherwise form a district where one is not currently in place.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

92. All existing overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded within the project frontage(s). Utility undergrounding shall extend to the nearest off-site power pole. Unless City Engineer approved, no new power poles shall be installed. A letter from the owners of the affected utilities shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to approval of the Precise Grading/Paving Plan, informing the City that they have been notified of the City’s utility undergrounding requirement and their intent to commence design of utility undergrounding plans. When available, the utility undergrounding plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer identifying all above ground facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

93. Upon City Engineer approval of any improvement plan, the improvement plan shall be provided to the City in digital format, consisting of a DWG (AutoCAD drawing file), DXF (AutoCAD ASCII drawing exchange file), and PDF (Adobe Acrobat) formats. Variation of the type and format of the digital data to be submitted to the City may be authorized, upon prior City Engineer approval.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

94. RBBD, TUMF, ADP fee and any city development impact fees that are in effect at the time of the SB330 submittal on October 9, 2025, shall be paid prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.

Prior to issuance
of certificate of
occupancy
Public Works
Department
3116
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 29 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)

95. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or final City approvals, demonstrate that all structural BMP’s have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications, and as identified in the approved WQMP.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Work
Department

96. Provide certification from JCSD to demonstrate that all water and/or wastewater service accounts have been documented.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

97. All damaged, destroyed, or modified pavement legends, traffic control devices, signing, striping, and street lights, associated with the proposed development shall be replaced.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

98. Remove existing and construct new pavement along the project frontage of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street with a minimum pavement section matching existing with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, along the entire half-width street frontage in accordance with City of Eastvale Standard Drawings. The pavement section shall be determined using appropriate Traffic Index (“TI”) accepted by the City Engineer. A California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall design the pavement section using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval.

Alternatively, depending on the existing street condition and as approved by the City Engineer, a street overlay, slurry seal, or other repair can be performed to preserve recent pavement improvements.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department

99. Construct an Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") compliant sidewalk behind curb along the entire frontage and interior streets in accordance with the General Plan, any Specific Plan, the City of Eastvale Standard Drawings, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
3117
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Tentative Tract Map 39416 Conditions of Approval Page 30 of 30
Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and
Signature)
100. Construct the following public improvements per City Standards along Walters Street: sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights, street trees, ADA ramps, grind and overlay. Construct the following improvements along Hellman Avenue: sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights, street trees, ADA ramps, grind and overlay to median, striping/signage prior to certificate of occupancy.

Prior to
Certificate
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
101. Removal of buddy pole along Hellman Avenue. Prior to Certificate
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
102. The project Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and/or a Property Owners Association document shall be provided to the City for final review and approval and shall address maintenance and operation of common areas and/or facilities including but not limited to private parking areas, private utilities, and water quality basins.

Prior to
Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning and
Public Works
Divisions
General Compliance Items/Requirements and Information
The following items are noted for the applicant’s information. These items are required by the City, other local agencies, or state and federal agencies, and are not conditions of approval of the project.

The applicant shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. Deviations not identified on the plans may not be approved by the City, potentially resulting in the need for the project to be redesigned. Amended entitlement approvals may be necessary as a result.

Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the project proponent shall, prior to acceptance of improvements, make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are otherwise deferred.
3118
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102– Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential). Major Development Review Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 26

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application Number and Description: Project No. PLN25-20102– Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of a 35 unit single family detached residential community on Tentative Tract Map 39416 subject to SB 330 and State Density Bonus Law, located generally at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street.

Assessor's Parcel Number: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144070-018, and 144-070-020 City Council Approval Date:

Conditions of Approval
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification (Date
and Signature)
General Conditions/Requirements

Applicant Signature Date
Must be
completed to
finalize approval
Planning
Division

Five (5) days
from project
approval
Planning
Division

3. Protest. The applicant may protest any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed by the City on the project in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 66020 and Eastvale Municipal Code Section 110.28.050(D). Any protest of the above impact fees, or any other fees, dedications, reservations, or Within 90 days
from project
approval
Building
Division
3119
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 2 of 38
other exactions imposed by the City on the project through PLN25- 20102 must be filed within 90-days of the date of this conditional approval of PLN25-20102.

Deferral of payment to final inspection or certificate of occupancy.

The applicant may elect to defer payment of impact fees to the date of the final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first, in accordance with Government Code Section 66007 and Eastvale Municipal Code section 110.28.050(B).

If the applicant elects to defer payment pursuant to Section 66007, the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro rata basis for each dwelling when it receives its final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first.

4. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, from any and all claims, demands, law suits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative, or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul any action of, or any permit or Ongoing Planning
Division
3120
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 3 of 38
approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.

It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action.

5. Applicant understands and agrees that failure to comply with all conditions of approval may result in the City Council/Planning Commission taking action resulting in modification of conditions of approval and/or suspension or revocation of the Major Development Review permit.

Ongoing Planning
Division

6. Approval of Major Development Review (PLN25-2012) shall lapse and become void as of June 24, 2028, unless building permits have been issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued towards completion on the structures that are the subject of Major Development Review (PLN25-20102), or a time extension is requested in writing prior to that date.

Ongoing Planning
Division

7. Approval of Major Development Review (PLN25-2012) is contingent upon approval of Tentative Tract Map 39416 and the Density Bonus Agreement. Failure to approve Tentative Tract Map 39416 and the Density Bonus Agreement shall render any approval of Major Development Review (PLN25-20102) null and void.

Ongoing Planning
Division
3121
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 4 of 38

8. All applicable Tentative Tract Map 39416 conditions of approval (PLN25-2012) shall be incorporated herein by reference.

Ongoing Building,
Planning, and
Public Works
Divisions

9. Major Development Review (PLN25-20102) is for the site planning and architecture of 35 single-family residential dwellings within Tentative Tract 39416 along with two (2) lots for open space purposes and four (4) lots for street purposes.

Ongoing Planning
Division

10. Any approval shall not be final until and unless the applicant's deposit account with Public Works has a balance of at least $10,000 to cover staff time to follow-up, monitoring, and other post-approval work by staff. The City reserves the right to request additional deposits to cover post-approval staff work and to half work if the deposit account is exhausted.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

11. Provide street sweeping services for onsite and offsite within project frontages weekly.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

12. Remove all graffiti within 24 hours pre-construction, during construction, and after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

13. A City of Eastvale Encroachment Permit is required for any improvements within the public right-of-way.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

14. All street cuts for utilities shall be repaired in accordance with City Standard or as recommended; and any interim trench repairs shall consist of compacted backfill to the bottom of the pavement structural section followed by placement of standard base course material in accord by the City Engineer and with the Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction (“Greenbook”). The base course material shall be placed the full height of the structural section to be flush with the existing pavement surface and provide a smooth pavement surface until permanent cap paving occurs using an acceptable surface course material.

Ongoing Public Works
Department
3122
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 5 of 38

15. In accordance with City's Moratorium policy to preserve newly paved streets, any and all street and/or trench cuts in newly paved streets will be prohibited or be subject to moratorium street repair standards as reference in Section 12.08.260 of the Eastvale Municipal Code.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

16. Any and all utility trenches or other excavations within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets resulting from the proposed development shall be backfilled and repaired in accordance with City of Eastvale Standard Drawings. The developer shall be responsible for removing, grinding, paving and/or overlaying existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets including pavement repairs in addition to pavement repairs made by utility companies for utilities installed for the benefit of the proposed development (i.e. Jurupa Community Services District, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, Time Warner, Verizon, etc.). Multiple excavations, trenches, and other street cuts within existing asphalt concrete pavement of offsite streets resulting from the proposed development may require complete grinding and asphalt concrete overlay of the affected off-site streets, at the discretion of the City Engineer. The pavement condition of the existing off-site streets shall be returned to a condition equal to or better than what existed prior to construction of the proposed development.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

17. Construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be provided during all phases of construction in accordance with City Standards and the direction of the City Engineer. As a minimum, all construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with Part 6 “Temporary Traffic Control” of the latest California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, or subsequent editions in force at the time of construction.

Ongoing Public Works
Department

18. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, consulting tribe(s), and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
Planning
Division
3123
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 6 of 38
resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation, include the following.

1. During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to monitor excavations. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated.

2. Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed.

The archaeologist shall contact the City at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The City must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a research design and data recovery program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the City before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the County coroner and City shall be contacted.

In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains.

4. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded During
Construction
3124
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 7 of 38
using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist in consultation with the consulting tribe(s) shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis.

19. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a cultural resources discovery:

Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Final Monitoring Report (refer to SDC CUL-6).

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
During
Construction
Planning
Division
Prior to Map Recordation
3125
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 8 of 38

20. The applicant shall enter into a Density Bonus Agreement with the City of Eastvale, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Planning
Division

21. Lots 11 and 24 of TTM 39416 shall be identified as affordable unit lots reserved for the Very-Low Income category.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Planning
Division

22. The applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the city, and shall guarantee by posting security(ies) to include all public improvements that the developer is conditioned to construct as part of this approval.

Prior to Map
Recordation
Public Works
Department
Notes on Grading and Construction Plans to be Implemented During Construction

23. The cover sheet of the building construction drawings shall include a blue line print of the City’s conditions of approval and shall be attached to each set of plans submitted for City approval.

Ongoing Planning
Division

24. Dimensioned building setbacks and property lines, street centerlines, and between buildings or other structures shall be designed on the plot plan.

Ongoing Building,
Planning, and
Public Works
Divisions

25. All property lines and easements must be shown on the plot plan. A statement that such lines and easements are shown is required.

Ongoing Building,
Planning, and
Public Works
Divisions

26. To ensure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Western Riverside County MSHCP, the proposed project will adhere to MSHCP Appendix C, Standard Best Management
Practices.

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
During
Construction
Planning
Division

27. The project will be subject to the general sound level standards of Eastvale Municipal Code Section 8.52.040, General Sound Level Standards.

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
Planning and
Community
Enhancement
3126
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 9 of 38
During
Construction
and Safety
Divisions

28. As an infill development site, construction will be occurring within a noise-sensitive environment. In accordance with Municipal Code requirements, any construction or maintenance activity on real property which may disturb the peace and comfort of inhabitants of the neighborhood or comfortable enjoyment of life and property is prohibited between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. during the months of June through September and 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. during the months of October through May, unless said work is of an emergency nature or a prior permit has been obtained from the Community Development Director.

To be
Implemented by
the Applicant
During
Construction
Planning and
Community
Enhancement
and safety
Divisions
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit

29. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall pay all necessary fees as determined by the City Engineer including but not limited to MSCHP fees and grading permit fees.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

30. Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will required performance security to be posted with the City.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

31. Prior to ground disturbances that would impact potentially suitable nesting habitat for avian species, the project applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common, migratory, and special status) regardless of the time of year during the nesting season, a qualified avian biologist retained by the project applicant will conduct pre‐construction Nesting Bird Surveys within three (3) days prior to project‐related disturbance within the entire project site and a 300-foot buffer around the project site at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. Surveys shall encompass all Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division
3127
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 10 of 38
suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows and cavities. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required.

The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked daily weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no‐work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.

32. In accordance with MSHCP species-specific objective #6 for burrowing owl, a preconstruction survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance by a qualified biologist where suitable habitat is present within the study area Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division
3128
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 11 of 38
(project site and surrounding 500-foot buffer). If active burrowing owl burrows are detected during the breeding season (March 1 through August 31), all work within 300 feet of any active burrow will be halted until that nesting effort is finished as determined by a qualified biologist. Work can resume when no other active burrowing owl nesting efforts are observed. If active burrowing owl burrows are detected outside the breeding season (September 1 through February 28), then a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and approved by the County of Riverside Environmental Programs Department in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan shall be prepared in accordance with guidelines in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl (2012) and the MSHCP, which allows for passive relocation (i.e., use of oneway doors and collapse of burrows). Burrowing owl burrows shall be excavated with hand tools by a qualified biologist when determined to be unoccupied and backfilled to prevent reentry.

33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written verification that a qualified archaeologist has been retained to develop and implement a Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The CRMP shall address the details of all monitoring activities and procedures to be followed to reduce the impacts to cultural and historic resources to a less than significant level as well as addressing potential impacts to undiscovered buried
archaeological resources associated with this project. The CRMP shall be reviewed by any consulting tribe(s) and reviewed and approved by the City.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division
3129
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 12 of 38

34. The project applicant shall provide for Native American monitoring during grading. The Native American monitor(s) shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The City shall coordinate with the consulting tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the project developer/applicant so that all parties can develop a mutually acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement, which will include the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual consulting tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division

35. The project archaeologist and the consulting tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager, and any contractors, and will conduct a mandatory cultural resources worker sensitivity training. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project site and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earth-moving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event that inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division

36. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City that the project applicant has retained a qualified paleontologist to develop and implement a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) to guide monitoring procedures and establish protocols to follow in the event of a fossil discovery. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre-grading conference, shall describe procedures for
paleontological resource surveillance, and shall establish in the PRIMP, in cooperation with the project applicant and City, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. If the Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division
3130
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 13 of 38
paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project applicant, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage.

37. A permit for the hauling of material to and from the project site shall be submitted to the City for approval.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

38. Submit a California civil engineer prepared earthwork cut and fill certification letter to the Engineering Division for review. If the required earthwork in cubic yards is 50 CY or less, a Precise Grading/Paving Plan will not be required; however, the applicant is required to pull an NPDES/Public Works permit prior to issuance of a Building Permit for record purposes.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

39. Development of the site is subject to the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for the City of Eastvale, under the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Board Order No. R8-2010-0036. Pursuant to the NPDES Permit, the developer shall ensure development of the site incorporates post-construction Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) in accordance with the Model Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”) approved for use for the Santa Ana River
Watershed. The developer is advised that applicable Site Design BMPs will be required to be incorporated into the final site design, pursuant to a site specific WQMP submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The site specific WQMP shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval with the Precise Grading/Paving Plan.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

40. Prior to commencing with any grading, the required erosion and dust control measures shall be in place. In addition, the following shall be included if not already identified:

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department
3131
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 14 of 38
a. 6 foot high tan colored perimeter screened fencing
b. Contractor information signage including contact information along the street frontage.
c. Post dust control signage with the following verbiage: “Project Name, WDID No., IF YOU SEE DUST COMING FROM THIS
PROJECT CALL: NAME (XXX) XXX-XXX, If you do not receive a response, please call the AQMD at 1-800-CUT-SMOG/1-800-228- 7664”

41. A Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with the California General Construction Stormwater Permit is required via the California Regional Water Quality Control Board online SMARTS system. A copy of the executed letter issuing a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number shall be provided to the City Engineer. The General Construction Permit requires the developer’s contractor to prepare and maintain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”).

The SWPPP requires all appropriate measures be implemented to prevent erosion and water pollution during construction.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

42. A California registered Geotechnical Engineer prepared Geotechnical/Soils Report shall be required for and incorporated as an integral part of the grading/paving plan for the proposed development. A copy of the Geotechnical/Soils Report shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the first submittal of the Precise Grading/Paving Plan.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

43. All stormwater runoff passing through the site shall be accepted and conveyed across the property in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. All on-site City Engineer approved retention or other facilities are required to contain the increase stormwater runoff generated from the proposed development. Provide a hydrology study to determine the volume of increased stormwater runoff due to development of the site, and to determine required stormwater runoff mitigation measures for the proposed development. The City Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department
3132
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 15 of 38
Engineer must approve the final retention basin sizing and other stormwater runoff mitigation measures determined upon review and approval of the hydrology and may require redesign or changes to site configuration or layout consistent with the findings of the final hydrology study. The existing “pre-developed” condition compared to the proposed “developed” condition shall be used to calculate the volume of increased stormwater runoff to retain on-site under the 100-year frequency storm.

44. Direct release of on-site nuisance water or stormwater runoff shall not be permitted to the adjacent public streets. Provisions for the interception of nuisance water from entering adjacent public streets from the project site shall be provided through the use of a minor storm drain system that collects and conveys nuisance water to landscape or parkway areas, and in only a stormwater runoff condition, pass runoff directly to the streets through parkway or under sidewalk drains.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Public Works
Department

45. Street names shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of grading permit. Suggested street names and alternatives shall be submitted in writing to the Community Development Director for approval. Phonic similarity with existing street names should be avoided.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division

46. The applicant shall be responsible for creating a proposed addressing list and exhibit for review and approval by the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of grading permit.

Addresses shall be suggested for any building(s) and/or any electrical/water single/dual irrigation meter pedestal(s) or temporary power poles.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning
Division

47. If the existing irrigation well will not be used as part of the redevelopment, it shall be properly decommissioned prior to grading activities. Well abandonment shall be performed in accordance with all applicable state and local regulatory requirements.

Prior to Issuance
of Grading
Permit
Planning and
Building
Division
3133
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 16 of 38
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

48. A Final Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the City prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Final Monitoring Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting tribe(s).

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

49. If paleontological resources are uncovered and after completion of the project, the project applicant shall submit the paleontologist’s follow-up report for approval by the City. The report shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and the present repository of the fossils. The project applicant shall prepare excavated material to the point of identification. The project applicant shall offer excavated finds for curatorial purposes to the City or its designee, on a first refusal basis. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to approval by the City. The project applicant shall make a one-time payment of curatorial fees for the storage of these resources in perpetuity.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning
Division

50. Submit California registered civil engineer or traffic engineer prepared traffic striping and signage plans for review and approval.

All required traffic thermoplastic striping and signage improvements shall be completed concurrently with street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department

51. Submit photometric of street lighting. All lights shall be Edison LS3 tariff and utilize General Electric Evolve LED luminaires per City Specifications. The developer shall be responsible for applying with Southern California Edison (“SCE”) for all appropriate service Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department
3134
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 17 of 38
points and electrical meters early in the process to avoid delays. The developer must pay for the electrical service of new meter pedestals installed until such time the improvements have been accepted and the underlying property is annexed into LMD/CFD.

52. The public street improvements outlined in these conditions of approval are intended to convey to the developer an accurate scope of required improvements; however, the City Engineer reserves the right to require reasonable additional improvements as may be determined in the course of the review and approval of street improvement plans required herein.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department

53. A WQMP and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be required, obligating the property owner(s) to appropriate operation and maintenance obligations of on-site BMPs constructed pursuant to the approved WQMP. The WQMP and Storm Water BMP Transfer, Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit and shall be Public Works Staff recorded at the Riverside County Recorder’s Office prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department

54. Provide pad elevation certifications for all building pads in conformance with the approved Precise Grading Plan to the Engineering Division prior to construction of any building foundation.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department

55. The developer shall connect to the JCSD sewer system and apply for a sewer connection account with JCSD.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
JCSD

56. Submit California registered civil engineer prepared sewer improvement plans to the JCSD/Engineering Division. The plans shall be JCSD approved prior to issuance of any building permits.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Public Works
Department and
JCSD
3135
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 18 of 38

57. The developer is advised that domestic water service is provided by JCSD. The developer shall be responsible for coordinating with JCSD and complying with all requirements for establishing domestic water service to the property.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
JCSD

58. The developer shall pay all necessary impact and mitigation fees required. These fees include, but are not limited to, fees associated with Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road Bridges Benefit District (RBBD) Fees, Quimby (parkland in-lieu) Fee, ADP and City Development Impact Fees.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

59. All construction shall comply with the most recently adopted City and State building codes:
2022 California Building Code
2022 California Residential Code
2022 California Electrical Code
2022 California Mechanical Code
2022 California Plumbing Code
2022 California Fire Code
2022 California Green Code
Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

60. Special Inspections-As California Building Code Section 1704 indicates, the owner shall employ one or more special inspectors who shall provide special inspections when required by CBC Section 1704.

Prior to Building
Permits
Building
Division

61. The Title Sheet of the plans shall include:

Occupancy Group
Occupant Load
Description of use
Prior to Building
Permits
Building
Division
3136
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 19 of 38
Type of Construction
Height of Building(s)
Floor area of building(s) and/or occupancy group(s)

62. The project applicant is required to pay school impact fees.

California Government Code Section 65996 indicates that payment of school impact fees is considered full mitigation for project impacts to a school district.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division and
Corona Norco
Unified School
District

63. Dimensioned building setbacks, property lines, street centerlines, and between buildings or other structures shall be designed on the plot plan.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

64. The project design will conform to energy conservation measures articulated in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and address measures to reduce energy consumption, such as flow restrictors for toilets, low-consumption light fixtures, and insulation.

It shall also use drought landscaping to the extent feasible.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

65. The plot plan must show all property lines and easements, and a statement stating that such lines and easements are shown is required.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

66. Per the Business and Professionals Code, a design professional will be required to prepare plans for proposed improvements at the time of construction drawings.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division

67. Public and private site improvements shall be designed per the Americans with Disabilities Act and Chapter 11 of California Building Code. The site plan shall include a site accessibility plan identifying exterior routes of travel and detailing running slope, cross slope, width, pedestrian ramp, curb ramps, handrails, signage, and truncated domes. Path of travel shall be provided form the public right of way and accessible parking to the building. The design Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Division
3137
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 20 of 38
professional shall ensure that the site accessibility plan complies with the latest Federal and State regulations.

68. The project applicant, developer, or successor in interest shall provide written verification that the Jurupa Community Services District can and will provide potable water service to the project.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building
Divisions

69. Prior to any demolition, grading, or off site disposal of debris, the project shall be conditioned to require that all discarded building materials be evaluated for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. If ACMs are identified, they shall be handled, removed, and disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor following all regulatory requirements.

Prior to issuance
of Building
Permits
Building and
Planning
Divisions

70. A Final Site Plan of Development shall be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. The Final Site Plan of Development shall include but is not limited to the following:
a. Master home plans and elevations.
b. Dimensioned site plan showing, but not limited to, the following:
o Setbacks
o Location of mailboxes
c. Final grading plan
d. Landscape and irrigation plans for private, common, and public areas
e. Wall and fence plans
f. Photometric Lighting Plan to ensure proper outdoor light, pursuant to City of Eastvale Municipal Code Section
120.05.050, Outdoor Lighting
Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Department
3138
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 21 of 38

71. Construction and architectural detailing shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, including but not necessarily limited to elevation drawings and material/colors sample board, submitted as part of this application and as approved by the City Council.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

72. Any future modification to the building colors or architectural style approved by the City Council shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. At the Community Development Director’s discretion, proposed color or architectural style modifications may be referred to the City Council for Major Development Review approval.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

73. Final plotting of homes on lots within Major Development Review (PLN25-20102) shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

74. Final plotting of homes, with the exception of homes plotted on Lot 9 and Lot 10 of TTM 39416 shall have a minimum driveway depth of 20 feet.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

75. An even mix of exterior façade treatments, colors, and roof tile colors shall be used on the homes approved per this Major Development Review to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Applicant shall provide a tabulation of proposed architectural styles and colors schemes to be implemented on lots for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

76. Mailboxes shall be designed, installed and located by the developer to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

77. Any future entry monumentation into the development of Tentative Tract Map 39416 shall be subject to review and approval by the Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division
3139
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 22 of 38
Community Development Director and the City Traffic Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.

78. All mechanical equipment, including but not limited to HVAC units, shall be screened from public view and sound buffered from adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Building Official
Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning and
Building
Divisions

79. The master conceptual wall and fence plan approved by the City Council as part of PLN25-20102 shall serve as the master plan of development for community walls and fences within TTM 39416.

The final design and location of project walls and fences shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

80. The applicant shall provide evidence that a good faith effort was made to enter into an agreement with the property owners of 7483, 7471, 7459, 7447, 7435, and 7423 Silver Saddle Court for the removal of their existing tract perimeter fencing (rear fence) and the construction of a new shared tract perimeter fence (rear fence) in conjunction with the development of project PLN25-20102. In the event that said one or more owners refuse to enter into such agreement, the applicant shall construct the eastern perimeter fence as shown within the development plans for PLN25-20102. Should the latter occur, the applicant shall utilize measures to ensure proper weed abatement occurs between the two parallel perimeter fences so as to prevent any vegetation from growing between the two fences.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

81. A digital copy of construction landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The plan shall be certified by a licensed landscape architect as required, taking into account approved preliminary landscape plan (if any), adopted plant alette guides, applicable scenic and specific plan requirements, and water conservation measures. This submittal shall be made to the Planning Division with the appropriate Application and fee.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division
3140
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 23 of 38

82. The above-described plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plans as approved by the City Landscape Architect, City Administrative staff, Planning Commission and/or City Council. Notes, details, and specifications shall be included.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division

83. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the Eastvale Municipal Code Chapter 14.24, Water Conservation for Landscaping, and Chapter 120.05.040, Landscape Requirements.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

84. Landscape construction plans shall be drawn at a scale of 20 feet equal to 1 Inch or larger. The city will not accept plans drawn at 30 feet scale or smaller. Plans set shall include a title sheet with all project information, construction plans and details, irrigation plans and details, planting plans and details and a photo exhibit sheet of selected planting palettes for communication of the palette and plants form, size, and character, in addition to site features and material to express design intent.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

85. Concrete mow curbs shall be required at edges defining maintenance responsibility such as property boundaries in frontage areas and for separating turf or groundcover from shrub areas.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

86. Planting shall offer horizontal and vertical variation in form, texture, and scale and shall include multiple species to prevent against loss of a monoculture of a single species from species specific pest or other cause.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

87. Canopy shade trees fully surrounded by hardscape shall be, based on the direction of the City Landscape Architect required to have special planting techniques including, specialized soil mixes, geotechnical support structures, or other instruments for maintaining uncompacted and healthy soil root zones for the trees needs based on species or size required and site-specific characteristics.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
3141
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 24 of 38

88. No light fixture, electric transformer, fire detector check, fire hydrant, or other utilities shall be designed for any location in a planting area, which would make it necessary to eliminate a tree. All overhead light fixtures and utilities shall be identified on the grading and site plans. Utilities shall be screened appropriately with landscaping. Any trees that are determined to be in conflict through the design development process shall be relocated to keep the same quantities shown on the approved entitlement plan, this shall include adjusting, adding, and revising or creating additional planting areas to support the total required number.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

89. All trees shall be double staked with vinyl type ties nailed to the lodge pole stakes in at least two vertical locations. Trees in high wind corridors or trees requiring special support measures shall require additional staking and or specialized staking material as needed.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

90. Root barriers shall be installed for all trees planted within 5 feet of hardscape, paving, or walls/ structures. All trees requiring root barriers shall extend 10’ from the center of the trunk in either direction and be a minimum of 24” deep.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

91. Any water quality basins shall utilize hand planted shrubs and ground cover on all slopes. The bottom of the basin shall be as planted as recommended by the WQMP and approved by the City Landscape Architect.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

92. All irrigation in shrub areas shall be designed and installed using drip irrigation. A weather-based smart irrigation controller shall be installed that measures evapo-transpiration. A rain shut off device shall be installed free of overhead obstruction and connected with the irrigation controller in addition to a master valve, flow sensor and separate Landscape water meter are required in addition to the above for all projects with landscape areas above 2500 square feet.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
3142
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 25 of 38

93. A water conservation statement shall be included in the landscape documentation package as well as Irrigation schedules for both establishment and maintenance, maintenance schedule, soil management plan (Soil test and recommendations) and the requirement for a third-party water audit of the installed irrigation system prior to final sign off.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

94. All plants shall be hydrozoned from low to medium water use according to WUCOLS IV as a general guide.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

95. Suggested irrigation and planting maintenance schedules shall be included for compliance with MWELO requirements.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

96. A soil management plan shall be included for compliance with MWELO requirements.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

97. A digital PDF reduced to the smallest size shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division and the City Landscape Architect once the Entitlement process has been completed. A licensed Landscape Architect shall prepare and sign/ certify the plans.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

98. Any plans that include areas to be classified as a Landscape Maintenance District or similar instrument to be maintained by the City shall be required to meet the most current Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency- Standards and Specifications (https://trans.rctlma.org/landscaping) per Public Works direction.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division

99. The above-described plans shall be in substantial conformance with the adopted city ordinances and or requirements as approved by the City Landscape Architect, City Planning Staff, Planning Commission and/or City Council. Notes, details, and specifications shall be included.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
3143
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 26 of 38
100. City required inspection schedule and signature block shall be included in the plans and be located on the tittle sheet.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
101. All fertilizers and soil amendments used during planting preparation and installation shall be derived from organic based materials as a best management practice for storm water source control.

Mycorrhizae and humate shall be incorporated into each plant pit in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and the recommendations of the soil management plan.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
102. A copy of the soil fertility recommendations and soil management plan specified using organic fertilizers and soil amendments shall be included on the first submittal of the landscape plans unless extensive grading is anticipated. In that case the landscape contractor shall provide the soil fertility recommendations and soil management plan prior to the pre-job meeting on site.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
103. The City Landscape Architect shall meet with the job site superintendent and the landscape contractor for a pre-job meeting.

Copies of required landscape submittals shall be presented for approval including soil test results per the soil management plan. The overall inspection schedule shall be reviewed, and all procedures shall be reviewed. No landscaping shall occur prior to the meeting.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
104. Trees on Hellman Avenue and Walters Street shall be 36” box specimens.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
105. On Hellman Avenue and Walters Street frontages a minimum of three (3) different levels of planting shall be provided and shall include groundcover, accents, and foundation of massing groupings, that shall vary species and flowering or interest seasons to offer yearround performance and avoid seasons or large swaths of planting in dormancy or in need of sever pruning.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
3144
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 27 of 38
106. Tract perimeter walls along Hellman Avenue and Walters Street frontages shall be planted with an appropriate vining species to soften the appearance of walls.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permits
Planning
Division
107. Access to rear yards shall require concrete steppers or other hardscape or gravel treatment to allow for refuse can storage/access.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
108. Front yard/interior street trees shall be 24” box specimens. Prior to Issuance of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
109. Interior accent Oak trees shall be 36” box specimens. Prior to Issuance of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
110. No planters shall be less than 5 feet wide, minimum tree size shall be 24” box, minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallon with the exception of spreading ground covers- 1 gallon minimum, for frontage areas- typical front yards shall require at least 50% 5- gallon shrubs as relief from the above standard 5-gallon requirement due to limited yard size.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
111. The Applicant shall submit a set of development plans, including a lighting plan, to the Eastvale Police Department for review and approval for appropriate safety measures including, but not limited to, the following:

PROPERTY GATES AND KNOX BOX ENTRY
a. The installation of the Knox Rapid Entry System if property gates are installed. This system permits law enforcement, fire, and first responders to obtain independent access to the property in the event of an emergency. The necessary order forms for the Knox Company may be obtained by contacting Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Building and
Police
Departments
3145
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 28 of 38
the Jurupa Valley Sheriff’s Station Crime Prevention
Programs Coordinator at (951) 955-9225.

ADDRESS NUMBERING:
b. Prominently displayed address numbering in size and
contrasting in color from the building façade or on a fixed sign near the street/main entrances. The numbers need to be visible from the street and interior property sides for any approaching emergency vehicles. No obstructions should
limit their visibility (i.e., landscaping).

SECURITY AND LIGHTING PLAN
c. Adequate crime prevention measures to assist with
identifying any suspect(s) of any potential future vandalism or theft attempts. Due to the high possibility of
theft/vandalism attempts during construction, additional security measures should be added during that time frame of proposed construction. All exterior access points should be properly illuminated to make clearly visible any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness.

Residential units shall be equipped with solid core doors and quality dead bolt locking devices at entry points.
3146
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 29 of 38
112. Fire protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow- Minimum fire flow for the construction of all buildings is required per CFC Appendix B. A reduction of up to 50% in the required fire flow is permitted for buildings equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance with the City Municipal Code. Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. On-site water supply must be available and operational before any combustible materials are placed on the construction site.

Specific design features may increase or decrease the required fire flow.
a. Will Serve Letters from the responsible water purveyor are required prior to map recordation.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
113. Fire Protection Water Supplies/Hydrants- The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with CFC Appendix C and NFPA 24. Fire hydrants shall be located no more than 600 feet from all portions of the exterior of the building along an approved route on a fire apparatus access road, unless otherwise approved by the fire department. IN areas where new water mains are extended along streets and hydrants are not needed for protection of structures, standard fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet along streets for transportation hazards. Fire hydrants shall be at least 40 feet from the building they are serving. A fire hydrant shall be located within 20 to 100 feet of the fire department connection for buildings protected with a fire sprinkler system. The size and number of outlets required for the approved fire hydrants are 4” x 2 ½” (Standard Hydrant Reference CFC as amended and NFPA 24.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3147
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 30 of 38
114. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall route a copy of the Water Improvement Plans (Offsite) to the Fire Department for review of hydrant placement only. Water Improvement Plans (Offsite) will not be reviewed or approved for the installation of onsite Private Fire Service Mains, private hydrants, or fire sprinkler system supplies. The installing contractor shall submit a separate set of working plans designed in accordance with NFPA13 and NFPA 24 to the Fire Department for a permit to install private water mains.
a. Building permits shall not be released prior to the approval of the offsite (JCSD Water Plans) in addition, an approved Fire Water Source and approved Fire Apparatus Access
Inspection shall be required prior to Building permit
issuance.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
115. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall route a copy of the Water Improvement Plans (offsite) to the Fire Department for review of hydrant placement only. Water Improvement Plans (offsite) will not be reviewed or approved for the installation of onsite Private Fire Service Mains, private hydrants, or fire sprinkler system supplies. The private fire service main installing contractor shall submit a separate set of working plans designed in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 24 to the Fire Department for a permit to install private water mains.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
116. Fire apparatus access roads shall be at least 24 feet wide and comply with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided within 150 feet of all exterior portions of buildings, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. Access roads shall not have a grade more than 16% and shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80,000 pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3148
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 31 of 38
on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. Unless otherwise approved, the grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 16 percent and the cross slope shall not exceed 2.5 percent. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be a maximum of 6 percent grade change for 25 feet of approach/departure. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Road base without an appropriate topping or binding material does not satisfy the all-weather requirement.
a. Fire Lane Marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signage, shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department Standards.
117. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads more than 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. Reference CFC 503.1.1, 503.2.1 as amended by the County of Riverside and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Guideline OFM-01A.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
118. Inside and Outside Turning Radii- The minimum inside turning radius for an access road shall be 24 feet. The minimum outside turning radius shall be 48 feet. As fire apparatus are unable to negotiate tight “S” curves, a 60-foot straight leg must be provided between these types of compound-turns or the radii and/or road width must be increased accordingly.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
119. Traffic Calming Devices are prohibited. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal.

Reference CFC 503.4.1
Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
120. Fire and Life Safety Requirements- Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews any subsequent submittals. These conditions will be based on California Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3149
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 32 of 38
Fire Code (CFC), California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted and amended at the time of construction plan. Submittal.
121. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or developer shall include in the building plans the required fire lanes and include the appropriate lane printing and/or signs.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
122. Secondary Access- Unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department, dead end fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 1,320 feet. Secondary egress/access fire apparatus access roads shall provide independent egress/access from/to the area or as other wise approved by the Fire Department. Secondary egress/access fire apparatus access roads shall be as remote as practical from the primary fire apparatus access road to reduce the possibility that both routes will be obstructed by a single emergency. Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access may be required by the Fire Department.

Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
123. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Fire Department for review and approval prior to final building permit issuance or commencement of landscape installation. The plans shall demonstrate that all trees, shrubs, palms, and other vegetation at mature size will not obstruct fire department laddering access, aerial apparatus operations, roof access or fire apparatus reach to any portion of the buildings.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3150
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 33 of 38
124. Gate Access: All electronically operated gates shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for access. These gates shall be provided with access to gate equipment or another method to open the gate if there is a power failure. A Pedestrian gate, if used to provide access, shall be a minimum 3 feet wide and provided with a Knox Box/Padlock if locked. Reference CFC 506.1.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
125. Phase construction fire access shall comply with Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Guideline OFM-01A. Construction Phasing Plan shall be submitted and reviewed prior to building permit release for each phase of construction.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
126. Residential Fire Sprinklers: Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and be approved prior to installation. Reference CRC.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
127. New Motorized gates shall be provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicles in accordance with the Riverside County Standards and policies. The system shall be compatible, but not limited to the detection of the following manufacturers of emergency vehicle preemption: Federal Signal, Whelen, and Tomar. These gates shall be provided with access to gate equipment or another method to open the gate if there is a power failure. (Manual gates shall not be locked unless a Knox padlock or Knox Box containing the key the lock is installed in an approved location on the approach side of the gate). A pedestrian gate, if used to provide access, shall be a minimum 3 feet wide and provided with a Knox Box/Padlock if locked. Upon installation of the system, compliance testing shall be completed by the Riverside County Fire Department. (RVC Amendment to CFC 503.6.1).

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
3151
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 34 of 38
128. The location of address numbers shall be indicated on the building plans. Street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street or fire apparatus access side of buildings. Numbers and letters shall be a minimum of 12” in height with a minimum stroke of .05 inch. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from a public way, a monument pole or other sign shall be used to identify the structure in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01-A. Address must be legible, of a contrasting color, and illuminated either internally or externally to be visible from the street at all hours.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
129. Provide specific fire department conditions on plans for building permit submittal.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Riverside
County Fire
Department
130. Plans should reflect that all street lights and other outdoor lighting are hooded or shielded to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky or above the horizontal plane.

Prior to Issuance
of Building
Permit
Planning
Division
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
131. A copy of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R’s) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval, prior to execution.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Division
132. The project CC&Rs shall include the following parking management practices:
 Requiring onsite parking permits (such as stickers or hangtags) for any parking in the surface guest parking spaces;  Policies for maximum times vehicles may be parked in the surface guest spaces;
 Policies for towing unauthorized vehicles; vehicles parked in unauthorized locations, such as fire lanes; vehicles parked in surface guest parking without a sticker, hangtag, or other Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Division
3152
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 35 of 38
identifiers; and vehicles parked longer than any maximum guest parking timeframes allowed;
 Policies prohibiting the parking, storage, or driving of commercial vehicle, RV, boat, trailer, ATV, golf cart, or similar vehicle on-site;
 Policies requiring all garages be used for the sole purpose of housing parked vehicles (i.e., not for storage purposes);  Policies authorizing routine garage inspections to ensure garages are available for vehicle parking; and
 Policies prohibiting on-street parking as a result of street widths.
133. Applicant shall include notification within the CC& R’s as well as within the project sales office informing potential homeowners that landscaping within City or H.O.A.-maintained areas is not to be modified in any way by the homeowner, without express
authorization by the entity (either the City or H.O.A) responsible for maintain said landscape.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Division
134. The applicant shall provide and install City-approved signage indicating “No Street Parking – Vehicles Subject to Towing.” Such signage shall be maintained in good condition for the life of the project and shall be located to ensure visibility to all users and visitors.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Division
135. Prior to the request for final inspection the Applicant shall have completed the installation of all landscape items, passed all construction sequence inspections in addition to having a completed 3rd party water audit with report, as built documents, controller charts submitted and approved prior by the City Landscape Architect. Failure to do so will result in delays for final inspection and or sign off.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Planning
Department
3153
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 36 of 38
136. All parkway landscaping shall be guaranteed for a period of one (1) year from the date of the City Engineer acceptance. Any landscaping that fails during the one (1) year landscape maintenance period shall be replaced with similar plant material to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
137. The development shall be annexed into all applicable CFD and/or LMD for traffic signals, street lights, full capture systems for all storm drains and landscape maintenance of raised landscape median and public parkways, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or otherwise form a district where one is not currently in place.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
138. All existing overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded within the project frontage(s). Utility undergrounding shall extend to the nearest off-site power pole. Unless City Engineer approved, no new power poles shall be installed. A letter from the owners of the affected utilities shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to approval of the Precise Grading/Paving Plan, informing the City that they have been notified of the City’s utility undergrounding requirement and their intent to commence design of utility undergrounding plans. When available, the utility undergrounding plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer identifying all above ground facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
139. Upon City Engineer approval of any improvement plan, the improvement plan shall be provided to the City in digital format, consisting of a DWG (AutoCAD drawing file), DXF (AutoCAD ASCII drawing exchange file), and PDF (Adobe Acrobat) formats.

Variation of the type and format of the digital data to be submitted to the City may be authorized, upon prior City Engineer approval.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
140. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final City approvals, demonstrate that all structural BMP’s have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications, and as identified in the approved WQMP.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
3154
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 37 of 38
141. Provide certification from JCSD to demonstrate that all water and/or wastewater service accounts have been documented.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
142. All damaged, destroyed, or modified pavement legends, traffic control devices, signing, striping, and street lights, associated with the proposed development shall be replaced.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
143. Remove existing and construct new pavement along the project frontage of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street with a minimum pavement section matching existing with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, along the entire halfwidth street frontage in accordance with City of Eastvale Standard Drawings. The pavement section shall be determined using appropriate Traffic Index (“TI”) accepted by the City Engineer. A California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall design the pavement section using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Alternatively, depending on the existing street condition and as approved by the City Engineer, a street overlay, slurry seal, or other repair can be performed to preserve recent pavement improvements.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
144. Construct an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant sidewalk behind curb along the entire frontage in accordance with the General Plan, any Specific Plan, the City of Eastvale Standard Drawings, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
145. Construct the following public improvements per City Standards along Walters Street: sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights, street trees, ADA ramps, grind and overlay. Construct the following improvements along Hellman Avenue: sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights, street trees, ADA ramps, grind and overlay to median, striping/signage prior to certificate of occupancy.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
3155
Eastvale City Council
Project No. PLN25-20102 – Regent Land Company (Warmington Residential) Major Development Review for TTM 39416 Conditions of approval Page 38 of 38
General Compliance Items/Requirements and Information
The following items are noted for the applicant’s information. These items are required by the City, other local agencies, or state and federal agencies, and are not conditions of approval of the project.

Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the project proponent shall, prior to acceptance of improvements, make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are otherwise deferred.
146. Removal of buddy pole along Hellman Avenue. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy
Public Works
Department
147. Applicant shall participate in the final adopted program with regards to providing a non-potable water supply source and related infrastructure improvements for parks and green belt areas.

Prior to Issuance
of Certificate of
Occupancy
JCSD
3156

CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROJECT NO. PLN25-20102 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 39416, MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, AND DENSITY

BONUS AGREEMENT (REGENT LAND COMPANY, LLC)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Eastvale City Council will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. at Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers located at 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752, to consider Project No. PLN25-20102 for the subdivision, site planning, and master building architecture of thirty-five (35) single-family residential lots, two (2) lettered lots for open space and four (4) lettered lots for street purposes and a Density Bonus Agreement.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project includes the following entitlements:

1. Tentative Tract Map 39416 to subdivide four (4) existing residential lots totally 3.57-acres into 35 residential lots, two (2) lots for open space purposes and four (4) for street purposes;

2. Major Development Review for the master building architecture and site planning of a 35- unit single-family residential community; and

3. Density Bonus Agreement for a density bonus housing agreement between the City of Eastvale and Warmington Residential California Inc. for a 35-unit single family residential housing development pursuant to California Government Code §§ 65915 through 65918.

PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144070-018, and 144-070- 020). The project site is not located on a hazardous materials site listed under Government Code Section 65962.5.

ENVIRONMENTAL: Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183, because implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts that are peculiar to the project site and the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed by the General Plan EIR, no additional environmental review beyond a Section 15183 Exemption Report is required for the proposed project.

Any person may submit written comments prior to the public hearing or may appear in person before the City Council to be heard. Written comments may be mailed to the City of Eastvale Planning Division located at 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 or via email to Jamie K.

Cerda, AICP at [email protected]. For the comments to be presented to the City Council at the meeting, all comments made in writing or via e-mail prior to the public hearing must be received by the City of Eastvale Planning Department no later than Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Oral and written comments may be submitted directly to the City Council at the public hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you raised at the public hearing as described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Eastvale City Council prior to or at the public hearing.

If you have any questions on the project, contact Jamie K. Cerda, AICP at (951) 703-4432 or [email protected].
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission Meeting

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Agenda Item No. 8.3
May 20, 2026
PLN25-20102 – Density Bonus Agreement, Tenta-ve Tract Map 39416, and Major Development Review for Regent Land Company, LLC Residential Development
Prepared By:

Jamie K. Cerda, AICP
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Recommend that the City Council find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Sec+on 15183 based on the findings and conclusions provided in the Exemp+on Determina+on Report, a1ached hereto and the conclusion that the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed by the General Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 20222080090);

2. Recommend City Council approval of the Density Bonus Agreement between Regent Land Company LLC and the City of Eastvale;

3. Recommend City Council approval of Tenta+ve Tract Map No. 39416 to subdivide four (4) exis+ng residen+al lots totaling 3.57 gross acres into 35 residen+al lots, two (2) open space purposes and four (4) for street purposes, subject to conditions of approval; and

4. Recommend City Council approval of the Major Development Review for the master building architecture and site planning of 35 single-family residen+al lots, landscaping, and parking areas, subject to conditions of approval.

Summary
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3167
The applicant, Regent Land Company is requesting approval of a density bonus agreement, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 39416 to subdivide four (4) exis+ng residen+al lots totaling 3.57 gross acres (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144070-018, and 144-070-020) into 35 singlefamily residen+al lots, two (2) le1ered lots for open space purposes, and four (4) lots for street purposes, as well as the master site planning and architecture of the 35 single-family residen+al homes with two (2) as affordable to very-low income.

As proposed, the project will u+lize waivers from development standards through a density bonus agreement pursuant to California Government Code sec+ons 65915 through 65918 and Eastvale Municipal Code (EMC) Sec+on 120.05.090. Addi+onally, the proposed project is subject to the provisions of Housing Accountability Act (HAA), which requires the City to approve the project at the density permi1ed by the General Plan land use designa+on for the subject site. The project requires approval by the City Council for the 22.5 percent density bonus to allow up to 9.8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) where the General Plan allows for densi+es up to 8 du/ac. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant’s requests due to the project sa+sfying the intent of the Eastvale General Plan 2040’s Housing Element to promote the development of adequate housing to meet the City’s fair share of the region’s housing needs for all income segments of the population and the provisions of HAA and State Density Bonus Law.

Background
Location
The 3.57-acre project site is located on four (4) exis+ng residen+al lots comprised of Assessor Parcel Numbers: 144-070-016, 144-070-017, 144-070-018, and 144-070-020 at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street. The project site is bound by exis+ng residen+al to the north, Walters Street and Philis+ne Rondo Elementary School of Discovery to the south, exis+ng residen+al to the east and Hellman Avenue and the City of Chino to the west.

Housing Accountability Act (HAA)
The applicant is proposing the subject development pursuant to the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) pursuant to Government Code Sec+on 65589.5. The HAA established the state’s overarching policy that a local government may not deny, reduce the density of, or make infeasible housing development projects, emergency shelters, or farmworker housing that are consistent with objec+ve local development standards. The HAA was originally enacted in 1982 to address local opposi+on to growth and change. Communi+es resisted new housing, especially affordable housing, and consequently, mul+ple levels of discre+onary review oGen prevented or delayed development.

As a result, developers had difficulty ascertaining the type, quan+ty, and loca+on where development would be approved. The HAA was intended to overcome the lack of certainty developers experienced by limi+ng local governments’ ability to deny, make infeasible, or reduce the density of housing development projects.

California Senate Bill 330, known as the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 or the HCA (A:achment 1), was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 9, 2019, and became effec+ve January 1, 2020.

The senate bill amended Government Code Sec+on 65941.1 with the broad goals of facilita+ng increased produc+on of new residen+al units, protec+ng exis+ng units, and providing for an expedited review and approval process for housing development projects through submi1al of a “preliminary applica+on.” On January 1, 2022, the HCA was extended un+l January 1, 2030, with the passage of Senate Bill 8.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3168
Among other s+pula+ons, SB 330 requires the following for applicable housing development projects:

New, non-objec+ve development standards established aGer January 1, 2020, cannot be imposed or enforced.

Applicable housing development projects must receive a decision in no more than five (5) public hearings-whether the item is being heard by the Planning Commission or City Council and including any appeals.

Prohibits any moratorium, project or ac+on that would result in a net downzoning, limit the number of permits to be issued, or otherwise reduce housing or limit overall population.

The applica+on is being submi1ed pursuant to HAA and, as such, the proposed development site will not be required to be rezoned, if found consistent with the objec+ve General Plan standards for the property. Moreover, the development is required to comply with the objec+ve Zoning Code standards applicable to the property, but only to the extent that they facilitate the development at the density allowed by the General Plan. Although the project site is currently zoned A-2 Heavy Agriculture, City Staff has iden+fied the R-1 One-Family Dwelling zoning designa+on as the most closely consistent zone with the exis+ng General Plan land use designa+on for the purpose of establishing development standards for the project (per HAA).

State Density Bonus Law
The California Density Bonus law allows developers who meet the requirements of the state law to seek increases in base density in exchange for providing affordable units on site. To help make construc+ng on-site affordable units feasible, the law allows for developers of density bonus projects of 20 percent to seek unlimited incen+ves/concessions and an unlimited number of waivers, which are essen+ally variances from development standards that would help the project be built without significant burden and without being a detriment to public health. The first version of the Density Bonus Law was adopted in 1979 and has since been amended at various +mes. In early 2017, the law was amended to restrict the ability of local jurisdic+ons to require studies to “jus+fy” the density bonus and requested incen+ves/waivers and places the onus on local jurisdic+ons to prove that the requested incen+ves/concessions or waivers are not financially warranted. Pursuant to California Government Code Sec+on 65915(d)(1) and 65915(e)(1), a local jurisdic+on is limited in its ability to deny requested concessions and waivers and is preempted from denying the Density Bonus application.

Waiver of Development Standards
Pursuant to HAA, the City has selected the One-Family Dwelling (R-1) development standards for the project. However, pursuant to the Density Bonus Law, the developer is seeking specific waivers from certain R-1 standards to facilitate development of the project. Table 1 outlines the waivers requested by the applicant.

Table 1: Requested Waivers
Item R-1 Standard Requested
Minimum Lot Size 7,200 square feet 2,600 square feet
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3169
Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 24 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 80 feet
Front Setback 20 feet 18 feet
Side Interior Setback 5 feet 4 feet
Side Street Setback 10 feet 5 feet
Max Fence Height 6 feet

7.5' (1.5' retaining with 6' privacy
fence)
8' (2' retaining with 6' privacy
fence)
11' (5' retaining with 6' privacy
fence)
Street Width
32 feet curb to curb
50-foot right-of-way
26 feet curb to curb
36-foot right-of-way
(Modified County Standard 106,
given private streets)
RDG-7
All projects of 10 or more
residential lots should include at
least one single-story floor plan
Two-story plan types (No singlestory model)
RDG-8
Garages are encouraged to be
placed at varying distance from
the street
All garages to be plotted at 20'
from right-of-way with the
exception of Lot 9 and Lot 10
Pursuant to Sec+on 120.05.090(g) of the Eastvale Zoning Code, an applica+on for a density bonus that includes devia+ons (incen+ves/concession and/or waivers) is required to be considered and approved by the City Council. Analysis of the requested waivers may be found in the sec+ons that follow.

The City Council shall grant a density bonus, incen+ves, concessions, and waivers requested by the applicant unless the City makes a wri1en finding, based upon substan+al evidence, of either of the following:

1. The incen+ve or concession is not required in order to provide for affordable housing costs or affordable rents; or

2. The incen+ve or concession would have a specific adverse impact, as defined in Government Code Sec+on 65589.5(d)(2), upon public health and safety or physical environment or any real property that is listed in the state register of historical resources and for which the city determines there is no feasible method to sa+sfactorily mi+gate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low and moderate income households.

To ensure the housing units remain affordable according to the density and waivers that are being granted by the City, the applicant is required to enter into a Density Bonus Agreement (Attachment 8) with the City. The Density Bonus Agreement iden+fies the affordable units, and their household 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3170
income limits, and other per+nent language such as the requirement for a resale restric+on agreement. Details related to the Density Bonus Agreement are discussed under the Density Bonus Agreement section of this report.

Analysis
Tentative Tract Map No. 39416
The applicant has submi1ed an applica+on for Tenta+ve Tract Map (TTM 39416) to subdivide four (4) exis+ng, previously developed residen+al lots totaling 3.57 gross acres into thirty-five (35) single family residen+al lots, two (2) lots for open space purposes and four (4) lots for street purposes within the Chandler Policy Area land use designation.

Municipal Code requirements pertaining to subdivisions (Tract Maps and/or Parcel Maps) are governed by the Subdivision Map Act (State of California Government Code § 66410-66499.58), and Title 130 (Subdivision) of the Eastvale Municipal Code. Furthermore, all subdivision maps must comply with the provisions of the City General Plan, Zoning Code, and all other ordinances, statutes and laws pertaining to the use, sale, leasing or subdivision of land.

General Plan Consistency
The subject property is classified as Chandler Policy Area in the Eastvale General Plan 2040. This classifica+on allows up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per acre or a base density of 29 total dwelling units for the project site (8 du/ac x 3.57 ac ≈ 29 du). Pursuant to the California Density Bonus law, the density bonus is the number of units permi1ed to be built in addi+on to the “base density”, or the number of units that would be permi1ed to be built under generally applicable local requirements without a density bonus. The amount of the density bonus is set on a sliding scale, based upon the percentage of affordable units at each income level (A:achment 2- State Density Bonus Law).

With the applicant’s u+liza+on of State Density Bonus law providing an affordable unit percentage of six percent (6%) or two (2) affordable units for the very low-income category (30-50 percent area median income for a four-person household size which is currently set at $103,900) or $55,950 annually, adjusted for a four-person household size (28.56 total du X 0.06 affordability rate ≈ 2 affordable du) the applicant is en+tled to a density bonus of twenty percent (22.5%) or an addi+onal seven (7) units above the base density of what would be permi1ed to be built under the General Plan without a density bonus. The applicant is reques+ng a total of only 35 residen+al units rather than their en+tled 36 residen+al units (29 base density units + 7 density bonus units) as part of this project.

Table 2: Density Bonus Calculation
Affordable Unit - 6% (2 units -
Very Low Income)*
Density Bonus Calculation Units Allowed
Based Density - Single Family Low 3.57 acres X 8 du/ac 28.56 Units

22.5 Percent State Density Bonus (6.426 x 0.225) + 7 units Total Units 35 units
*Affordable unit percentage is calculated excluding units added by a density bonus.

Tenta+ve Tract Map No. 39416 (A:achment 3) proposes a density of 9.8 du/ac (i.e., 35 residen+al lots ÷ 3.57 acres = 9.8 du/ac), exceeding the permi1ed density for the site per the General Plan (i.e., 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3171
8 du/ac); however, pursuant to State Density Bonus Law, units added by a density bonus (i.e., 7 addi+onal units) are excluded from density calcula+on; therefore, the project has a proposed density of 8 du/ac (i.e., 28.56 base density units ÷ 3.57 acres = 8 du/ac); therefore consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the Chandler Policy Area.

Zoning Code Compliance
The property is zoned A-2 Heavy Agriculture. This designa+on is intended as an area for large lot single-family residential units with minimum lots sizes of 20,000 square feet.

As proposed, TTM 39416 does not conform to the development standards of the A-2 zone in that the 35 proposed residen+al parcels do not sa+sfy the minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, lot width of 100 feet, and lot depth of 150 feet. The smallest lots comprising TTM 39416 have minimums of 2,698 square feet in size, 33 feet in width, and 80.5 feet in depth.

However, under the provisions of HAA, a housing development cannot be required to rezone the property if it is consistent with the objec+ve General Plan standards for the property. As stated above the proposed project complies with the standards of the Chandler Policy Area General Plan land use designa+on. The proposed development also needs to comply with the objec+ve zoning code standards applicable to the property, but only to the extent they facilitate the development at the density allowed by the General Plan.

Since the development standards of the A-2 zone would preclude the development of the site at the density permi1ed by the General Plan, the applicant designed the community to reflect the development standards of the R-1 zone outlined in Table 3.2-2 of the Eastvale Zoning Code to the greatest extent feasible and is formally reques+ng waivers from the development standards the project cannot satisfy in order to maintain the by-right density of eight (8) dwelling units/acre.

While the minimum lot size, width, and depth of the proposed lots do not meet all the minimum standards outlined in Table 3.2-2 of the Eastvale Zoning Code for the R-1 zone, the R-1 zone is the only zone designated for single family detached residen+al units. The proposed development standards will be discussed in greater detail later in this report.

Access and Circulation
Access to the tract is proposed via a driveway along Walters Street (i.e., Street “A”) and a driveway along Archibald Avenue (i.e., Street “B”). The entry road off Walters Street (i.e., Street “A”) would extend into the site a distance approximately 330 feet where it intersects Street “B” providing vehicular access back out to Archibald Avenue approximately 260 feet away. The entry ways would include decora+ve paving treatment, and enhanced landscape nodes at either side to create an a1rac+ve “grand entry”. All streets within the tract are proposed to be private and maintained by the Homeowners Association.

The streets are designed with a 26-foot paved sec+on and 5- foot sidewalk on either side within a 36-foot-wide right-of-way, which does not meet minimum street standards for public streets; however, the streets are proposed to be private and are designed to meet Riverside County Modified County Standard 106 for Private Streets. The Riverside County Fire Department has reviewed the proposed street design and Fire Lane Striping Plan to ensure adequate circula+on and is suppor+ve of the proposed design. Lastly, the City Engineer has reviewed the proposed project access and on-site circulation and did not cite any concerns with the proposed design. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3172
Grading and Drainage
Site eleva+on is rela+vely flat with a gently sloping terrain with surface drainage generally directed to the south. Regional water quality regula+ons require storage and treatment of stormwater onsite to the maximum extent feasible in order to reduce pollutant loads, prior to discharge downstream. Accordingly, the applicant’s Hydrology Report proposes the project will direct onsite flows towards the southeast corner of the project site via a series of gu1ers throughout the development. Surface flows in these proposed gu1ers will direct runoff towards a modular wetland system before discharging into an exis+ng storm drain system within Walters Street, which ultimately outfalls to Cucamonga Creek.

The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plan for the project and has not expressed any concerns regarding the proposed design. Standard condi+ons of approval have been suggested that require final grading and drainage plans and the final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit.

Traffic
As the proposed project is consistent with the development density allowed on the project site by the General Plan, the proposed 35-unit residential project would not result in transportation impacts that are peculiar or more severe than those disclosed in the General Plan EIR adopted and cer+fied by the City Council on March 27, 2024.

Noise
In general, construc+on ac+vi+es on the project site would increase ambient noise levels in the vicinity on an intermi1ent but temporary basis. Noise levels during construc+on would fluctuate depending on the construc+on phase, equipment type and dura+on of use, distance between the noise source and receptors (i.e., neighboring residences and schools in the vicinity), and the presence or absence of barriers between the noise source and receptors. Staff notes that construc+on-related noise is exempt from the City’s noise control ordinance, provided that construc+on noise occurs between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. June through September and between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. October through May. Staff has also included a condi+on of approval reitera+ng allowable construc+on hours and emphasizing the sensi+vity of this issue to surrounding neighboring residents and the Philis+ne Rondo Elementary School of Discovery. It is an+cipated that the primary source of noise impacts to the project site would be traffic noise from Archibald Avenue that is adjacent to the west side of the project site.

Public Infrastructure
Implementa+on of the proposed project will result in addi+onal demand on exis+ng public services, including demand for fire and police services. However, this increase in demand can be accommodated by exis+ng service levels, and therefore would be less than a significant impact.

Addi+onally, the increase in demand to the u+li+es, i.e., water, gas, power, and sewer, can be accommodated by exis+ng service levels as there is sufficient capacity to serve the project site under present condi+ons. Jurupa Valley Community Services District (JCSD) has provided a will-serve letter for the proposed project confirming availability of sufficient water supply to serve the project.

In addi+on, Riverside County Fire Department has reviewed the proposed site plan for fire/emergency access and did not iden+fy any significant issues of concern that would require 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3173
further submi1als to Riverside County Fire Department subsequent to any approval of the project granted by the City. Riverside County Fire Department suggest applicable standard condi+ons of approval, which staff has included in the attached conditions of approval.

Schools
The proposed project would not include significant or unplanned popula+on growth as the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The project would be required to comply with SB 50 requirements, which allow school districts to collect impact fees from developers of new projects.

According to Sec+on 65997 of the California Government Code, payment of statutory fees is the exclusive method of mi+ga+ng environmental effects related to the adequacy of school facili+es.

Thus, upon payment of required fees by the applicant consistent with exis+ng State requirements, impacts would be less than significant. Furthermore, Corona-Norco Unified School District has provided the applicant a Will-Serve le1er confirming their availability to accept student enrollment from the proposed development (Attachment 14).

Parks and Recreation
In an effort to develop and maintain a comprehensive system of parks, recrea+on and natural open space lands that meet the ac+ve and passive recrea+on and open space needs of all residents and visitors, the Eastvale General Plan, specifically Policy CO-2.4, requires new residen+al developments to dedicate land and/or payment of in lieu fees consistent with state law. As outlined in Sec+on 130.20.020 of the Eastvale Municipal Code, applicants are required to provide three (3) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents within the subdivision. In the case of the subject project the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 0.31 acres of land for public parks and recrea+onal purposes.

This is calculated by the number of dwelling units in the subdivision (35 residen+al units) mul+plied by the average number of persons per dwelling unit (2.98 persons per detached single family residen+al unit) mul+plied by .003 (3 acres per 1,000 residents). As the proposed project will not offer any onsite public park and recrea+onal facili+es, the applicant will be required to remit necessary in lieu fees as a condi+on of approval. In lieu fees are calculated using the fair market value of the land divided by 3.57 (project site acreage) and mul+plied by 0.31 (parks and recrea+on land dedica+on requirement). Prior to recording the Final TTM, the applicant will be required to pay the required fees ensuring Eastvale’s goal of a comprehensive system of parks, recrea+on and natural open space lands are available to all residents and visitors.

Major Development Review
In order to safeguard and enhance the appearance and quality of development in the City of Eastvale, Sec+on 120.02.010 of the Eastvale Zoning Code requires Major Development Review approval for any new single-family subdivision development. This scope of review is outlined in the aforementioned code section, and includes, but is not limited to, exterior design, materials, textures, colors, as well as ensuring the proposed structures will be property related to the site and to the surrounding site in order to prevent structures detrimental to the character of the buildings already established in the area. The proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable development standards and required findings for a Major Development Review as set forth in Sec+on 120.02.010 (C)(5) of the Eastvale Zoning Code. The required findings are detailed in Attachment 9 – Draft Resolution.

Architecture and Treatments
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3174
As proposed, the thirty-five (35) single-family homes are designed with quality urban design, architecture and landscaping. Based on staff’s review, the project is generally consistent with the Eastvale Design Guidelines except for the requested waivers discussed below.

The applicant is proposing three (3) different model home plans. The table below provides a summary description of the models proposed:

Table 3: Plan Summary
Plan
Square
Footages
No. of Stories
No.

Bedrooms
No. of
Bathrooms
Garage
Parking
Percentage
of Total
Project
Plan 1 1,905 ft2 2
3 + loft (4 bed
option)

2.5 2/421 ft2 31%
Plan 2 2,075 ft2 2
4 + loft (5 bed
option)

2.5 2/423 ft2 37%
Plan 3 2,150 ft2 2
3 + loft + flex
(5 bed
option)
3 2/489 ft2 31%
In addi+on to the three (3) different plan types, the following three (3) architectural styles are also proposed as part of the master architecture:

Cottage (31 percent of units)
Farmhouse (34 percent of units)
Monterey (34 percent of units)
Included in the development plans (A:achment 5) the applicant proposes a total of nine (9) different color schemes, seven (7) different trim and siding colors, and five (5) different roofing materials for the above models. Addi+onal architectural details include window shu1ers, wood siding, pronounced windowsills and ledges, and board and batten.

The variety of op+ons available to all plans will ensure that a rich diversity of colors and materials will be apparent throughout the community. The illustra+ve color eleva+ons contained within the project plan set provide further details regarding these proposed options.

The City of Eastvale’s Design Standards and Guidelines (RDG-7) requires all projects with ten (10) or more residen+al lots to include at least one single-story floor plan. The proposed project consists of 35 residen+al units with no single-story floor plan but rather three (3) two-story models. To achieve the necessary density of eight (8) dwelling units an acre afforded by HAA and State Density Bonus Law the individual lot sizes of the project are forced to be smaller than most R-1 zoned proper+es in that they range from 2,698 to 4,096 square feet. The applicant’s proposed two-story models range in size from 1,950 – 2,150 square feet. Given the small lot size of Tenta+ve Tract Map 39416 and the fact that single-story floor plans have larger footprints than two-story floor plans it would not be feasible to construct a compa+ble or desirable single-story model in the proposed tract; therefore, staff is supportive of the requested waiver.

Site Planning
Staff reviewed the site plan for each of the lots under considera+on as part of this Major 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3175
Development Review. As noted above, the proposed development needs to comply with the objec+ve zoning code standards applicable to the property, but only to the extent they facilitate the development at the density allowed by the General Plan.

To create consistency with the surrounding single-family residen+al neighborhoods and in compliance with HAA, the applicant designed the community to the R-1 One-Family Dwelling development standards, to the greatest extent feasible. Apart from the front and side yard setback standards, requested to be waived, all residen+al units are plo1ed in compliance with the standards applicable to the R-1 One-family Dwelling zone. As such, staff is suppor+ve of the proposed plo\ng as it meets the intent of HAA as well as creates a compa+ble development within an exis+ng developed portion of the city.

Compliance with R-1 One-Family Dwelling Residential Development Standards Standard Required Proposed Meets Standard
Front Setback 20 feet 18 feet No
Rear Setback 10 feet 10 feet Yes
Side Yard Setback
(Interior)
5 feet 4 feet No
Side Yard Setback
(Street Side)
10 feet 6 feet No
Building Height 40 ft. Maximum 26 feet Yes
Off-Street Parking
2 covered spaces
minimum
2 covered spaces and 2
driveway spaces
Yes
As stated previously, pursuant to Government Code Sec+on 65915(e)(1), if a city development standard would physically prevent the project from being built at the permi1ed density, the developer may propose to have those standards waived or reduced. The applicant is reques+ng a two-foot reduc+on in the front yard setback from twenty feet to eighteen feet on Lot 9 and Lot 10.

Staff has evaluated the request and found that the proposed front yard setback con+nues to meet the minimum off-street parking dimension of eighteen feet; therefore, allowing Lot 9 and Lot 10 to provide driveway spaces. Addi+onally, the loca+on of these lots, located off an alley and not a main road, would not affect general circula+on and for this reason staff is suppor+ve of the requested wavier. A one-foot reduc+on or waiver of the interior side yard setback from five (5) feet to four (4) and a four (4) foot reduc+on or waiver of the street side yard setback from ten (10) feet to six (6) feet is also proposed. Staff has evaluated and determined the requests comply with California Building Code and does not pose a health and safety risk; that paired with the narrower lot width than typical R-1 zone property (33 feet versus 60 feet), staff supports the waiver request.

Parking
Each proposed dwelling unit would include two (2) garage spaces and two (2) driveway spaces, for a total of 140 spaces, with the project providing an addi+onal six (6) guest parking stalls on Street “B.” Pursuant to Sec+on 120.05.060 of the Eastvale Zoning Code, the project would exceed the City’s minimum parking requirement of 70 spaces (2 spaces per dwelling unit) by 76 parking spaces (70 driveway spaces + 6 guest parking stalls). In addi+on, the site is parked in compliance with California Government Code Sec+on 65915(p)(1)(B)(C) in that California Density Bonus Law allows

2.5 parking spaces per four or more bedrooms, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking. It should be noted, given the width of the private streets, that vehicles are prohibited from parking on the 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3176
street.

The Major Development Review includes provisions requiring the following parking management prac+ces, to be incorporated into the final, recorded CC&Rs, and applicable throughout the life of the project:

Requiring onsite parking permits (such as s+ckers or hangtags) for any parking in the surface guest parking spaces;
Policies for maximum times vehicles may be parked in the surface guest spaces; Policies for towing unauthorized vehicles; vehicles parked in unauthorized loca+ons, such as fire lanes; vehicles parked in surface guest parking without a s+cker, hangtag, or other identifiers; and vehicles parked longer than any maximum guest parking timeframes allowed; Policies prohibi+ng the parking, storage, or driving of commercial vehicle, RV, boat, trailer, ATV, golf cart, or similar vehicle on-site,
Policies requiring all garages be used for the sole purpose of housing parked vehicles (i.e., not for storage purposes); and
Policies authorizing rou+ne garage inspec+ons to ensure garages are available for vehicle parking.

Walls and Landscaping
Sec+on 120.05.030 Table 5.3-1 of the Eastvale Zoning Code establishes the height and development standards for fences, walls and screens within residen+al zoning districts. Pursuant to Table 5.3-1 fencing is limited to a maximum of six feet (6’) in height.

The proposed fencing along the project’s boundaries, including Hellman Avenue and Walters Street would consist of a six-foot (6’) tall split face block with a tan concrete masonry unit (CMU) cap, and decora+ve pilasters consistent with the Zoning Code. Internal to the project site, return walls and privacy walls between residen+al lots consist of a six-foot (6’) high, tan vinyl fence and vinyl gate.

The northern tract boundary or rear walls of Lots 1-5 range in height due to the proposed grade differences between the subject site and the proper+es to the north. The northern wall is a combina+on retaining/privacy screen wall with a total max height of eight (8) feet (2’ retaining + 6’ privacy/screen) as visible from the proper+es to the north. The applicant is reques+ng a waiver from the six-foot height limitation to construct the northern wall.

The eastern tract boundary or rear walls of Lots 9-21 range in height due to the proposed grade differences between the subject site and the proper+es to the east. The eastern wall is a combina+on retaining/privacy screen wall with a total max height of 7.5 feet (1.5’ retaining + 6’ privacy/screen) as visible from the proper+es to the east. The applicant is reques+ng a waiver from the six-foot heigh limita+on to construct the eastern wall. Staff has added a condi+on of approval that the applicant make a good faith effort to obtain approval of each adjacent property owner to the east in order to remove the exis+ng block wall and replace with one singular block wall. Should an exis+ng owner not wish to enter into such an agreement with the applicant and have the desire to keep their exis+ng 6’ block wall then the applicant shall construct their proposed 7.5’ wall adjacent to the exis+ng 6’ wall and incorporate a weed abatement that would prevent vegeta+on from growing between the two walls.

The western tract boundary or rear walls of Lots 22-28 range in height due to the proposed grade 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3177
difference between the subject site and the property to the west (APNs: 144-070-021 and 144-070- 019). The western wall is a combina+on retaining/privacy screen wall with a total max height of eight (8) feet (2’ retaining + 6’ privacy/screen) as visible from the property to the west. The applicant is requesting a waiver from the six-foot height limitation to construct the northern wall.

Lastly, the rear walls of lots 31-35 (facing south) range in height due to the proposed grade difference between the subject site and the property to the south (APN: 144-070-019). The southern facing wall is a combina+on retaining/privacy screen wall with a total max height of eleven (11) feet (5’ retaining + 6’ privacy/screen) as visible from the property to the south. The applicant is requesting a waiver from the six-foot height limitation to construct this wall.

As stated before, if a city development standard would physically prevent the project from being built at the permi1ed density, the developer may propose to have those standards waived or reduced according to Government Code Sec+on 65915(e)(1). In the case of the applicant’s Wall and Fence Plan, staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the waivers are necessary to develop the site to the density permi1ed by right under the General Plan and HAA. The exis+ng site topography with developed single family residen+al property to the north, south and east, is necessary to retain and stabilize the site via retaining walls as well as provide future residents the expected level of privacy (i.e., 6’ screen wall).

The applicant’s Preliminary Landscape Plans (A:achment 6) offer enhanced landscaped frontages (i.e., Hellman Avenue and Walters Street) and entrances into the future residen+al community (i.e., Street “A” and Street “B”), crea+ng a sense of arrival. The frontages will be planted with Coastal Live Oak and Silk Oak trees, shrubs consis+ng of Fortnight Lily, Spanish Lavender, Li1le John, Sweet Bay, Compact Texas Ranger, and many others. Addi+onally, where visible, tract perimeter walls will be condi+oned to be clad in Ivy to soGen the appearance of the block walls and provide addi+onal greening to the community. Finally, per the City of Eastvale’s Residen+al Design Standards and Guidelines, each lot is required to plant a minimum of one (1) yard tree. To meet the Residen+al Design Standard the applicant proposes the following trees for both accent and screening purposes:

Bisbane Box, and Fern Pine trees.

Overall, staff believes that the proposed landscape and wall plans are sa+sfactory. They are generally consistent with other approved tract wall/landscape plans and will ensure aesthe+c treatment of the tracts common areas and other perimeter (publicly visible) por+ons of the tract, and will support a high-quality community design, similar to other developments areas throughout the city. A final landscape plan will be reviewed during the building permit process to ensure that the details of the proposed landscape plan comply with the City landscape regulations.

Density Bonus Agreement
The Density Bonus Agreement for the project is provided as Attachment 8. The Agreement identifies the affordable units, and their household income limits, and other per+nent language such as the term of the agreement. The following summaries the salient sections within the Agreement.

Of the total units in the development, two (2) units are proposed to be affordable to households earning less than $55,950 (30-50 percent of the AMI, which is currently set at $110,000 adjusted for a four-person household size), as published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The applicant proposes both of the affordable units to be Plan 1 which consists of a 1,905 square foot, three-bedroom, two and a half bath, two story unit with a two 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3178
(2) car garage. The proposed units will be distributed within the 35-unit community and are required to be comparable to the market-rate units in their appearance, materials, and exterior and interior finishes, appliances, and fixtures.

Other terms and conditions of the Density Bonus Agreement include:

Homebuyers will be required to execute a Resale Restric+on Agreement in which each restricted unit must be occupied as the homebuyer’s principal residence.

Affordable units cannot be concentrated in one loca+on within the project site but instead dispersed throughout the project.

The City has the right to inspect the affordable units and documents.

Public Hearing Notification and Comment
The project requires a minimum 10-day public hearing no+fica+on period for property owners and commercial tenants within a 600-foot radius of the project site. The public hearing no+ce was published in the Press Enterprise newspaper on May 10, 2026, for the Planning Commission mee+ng on May 20, 2026, and mailing no+ces were mailed on May 7, 2026. The No+ce of Public Hearing and a map showing the proper+es that received no+fica+on are included as A:achment 12 and Attachment 13. As of this writing, staff has not received any correspondence on this project.

Environmental
Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sec+on 15183, because implementa+on of the proposed project would not result in impacts that are peculiar to the project site and the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed by the General Plan EIR, no addi+onal environmental review beyond a Sec+on 15183 Exemp+on Report is required for the proposed project. A Sec+on 15183 Exemp+on Report was prepared for the project and has been included as Attachment 7 of this report.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: B | Goal #: E Diversify the housing stock with more options.

Fiscal Impact
Processing the proposed applica+ons will have li1le to no fiscal impact on the City as the project is funded by the applicant.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
There is no prior City Council or Planning Commission action on the subject site.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Housing Accountability Act
Attachment 2 - State Density Bonus Law
Attachment 3 - Tentative Tract Map 39416
Attachment 4 - Plot Plan
Attachment 5 - Architectural Development Plans
Attachment 6 - Landscape Plans
Attachment 7 - Section 15183 CEQA Exemption Report
Attachment 8 - Draft Affordable Housing Agreement
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3179
Attachment 9 - Resolution
Attachment 10 - Conditions of Approval (TTM)
Attachment 11 - Conditions of Approval (MDR)
Attachment 12 - Public Hearing Notice
Attachment 13 - Radius Map
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3180
May 20, 2026
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Ave #910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Re: Proposed Housing Development Project at Hellman Avenue and Walters Street By email: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Dear Eastvale Planning Commission,
The California Housing Defense Fund (“CalHDF”) submits this letter to remind the City of its obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the proposed 35-unit housing development project at Hellman Avenue and Walters Street, which includes two very low-income units. These laws include the Housing Accountability Act (HAA), the Density Bonus Law (DBL), AB 130, and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

The HAA provides the project legal protections. It requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant housing development projects unless findings can be made regarding specific, objective, written health and safety hazards. (Gov. Code, § 65589.5, subd. (j).) The HAA also bars cities from imposing conditions on the approval of such projects that would reduce the project’s density unless, again, such written findings are made. (Ibid.) As a development with at least two-thirds of its area devoted to residential uses, the project falls within the HAA’s ambit, and it complies with the City’s general plan and local zoning. Of note, under the HAA, a project is considered to comply with local zoning if the project is consistent with the objective general plan standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the general plan. (Id. at subd. (j)(4).) The HAA’s protections therefore apply, and the City may not reject the project except based on health and safety standards, as outlined above. Furthermore, if the City rejects the project or impairs its feasibility, it must conduct “a thorough analysis of the economic, social, and environmental effects of the action.” (Id. at subd. (b).)
2221 Broadway, PH1, Oakland, CA 94612
www.calhdf.org
3181
CalHDF also writes to emphasize that the DBL offers the proposed development certain protections. The City must respect these protections. In addition to granting the increase in residential units allowed by the DBL, the City must not deny the project the proposed waivers and concessions with respect to lot size, lot width, lop depth, front setback, side street setback, fence height, street width, lack of single-story floor plan, and garage placement. If the City wishes to deny requested waivers, Government Code section 65915, subdivision (e)(1) requires findings that the waivers would have a specific, adverse impact upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact. If the City wishes to deny requested concessions, Government Code section 65915, subdivision (d)(1) requires findings that the concessions would not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, that the concessions would have a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety, or that the concessions are contrary to state or federal law.

The City, if it makes any such findings, bears the burden of proof. (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)(4).) Of note, the DBL specifically allows for a reduction in required accessory parking in addition to the allowable waivers and concessions. (Id. at subd. (p).) Additionally, the California Court of Appeal has ruled that when an applicant has requested one or more waivers and/or concessions pursuant to the DBL, the City “may not apply any development standard that would physically preclude construction of that project as designed, even if the building includes ‘amenities’ beyond the bare minimum of building components.” (Bankers Hill150 v. City of San Diego (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 755, 775.) Furthermore, the project is exempt from state environmental review pursuant to Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning). The project is also eligible for a statutory exemption from CEQA pursuant to AB 130. (Pub. Res. Code, § 21080.66.) Caselaw from the California Court of Appeal affirms that local governments err, and may be sued, when they improperly refuse to grant a project a CEQA exemption or streamlined CEQA review to which it is entitled. (Hilltop Group, Inc. v. County of San Diego (2024) 99 Cal.App.5th 890, 911.)
As you are well aware, California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage. New housing such as this is a public benefit: it will bring new customers to local businesses; it will expand the city’s tax base; and most importantly, it will reduce displacement of existing residents by reducing competition for existing housing. CalHDF therefore strongly urges the City to approve the project as proposed, consistent with its obligations under state law.

CalHDF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households. You may learn more about CalHDF at www.calhdf.org. 2 of 3
3182
Sincerely,
Dylan Casey
CalHDF Executive Director
James M. Lloyd
CalHDF Director of Planning and Investigations
3 of 3
3183
From: Jordan Brown
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: PLN25-20102
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 3:04:25 PM
External Sender - From: (Jordan Brown
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing as a concerned homeowner in Eastvale regarding the proposed development of 35 affordable housing units on the lot located at the corner of Helman Avenue and Walters Street, next to Rondo Elementary School.

While I understand the importance of expanding housing opportunities within our community, I have serious concerns about the impact this project could have on neighborhood safety and infrastructure.

Our area already experiences significant congestion, particularly during school drop-off and pick-up times. Helman Avenue is narrow, has limited sidewalk access, and is not well-suited to handle a substantial increase in vehicle traffic. Adding 35 new units would likely intensify traffic conditions and create additional safety concerns for students, pedestrians, and residents.

I am also concerned about emergency vehicle access in an already constrained area. Increased congestion combined with inadequate pedestrian infrastructure could create dangerous conditions near the school and throughout the neighborhood.

I respectfully ask the Council to carefully reevaluate this proposal, including conducting a comprehensive traffic and public safety impact 3184
study before moving forward. I also encourage greater community engagement so residents have the opportunity to voice concerns and discuss development solutions that better balance housing needs with neighborhood safety and quality of life.

Thank you for your time, consideration, and service to our community. I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to hearing your response.

Sent from my iPhone
3185
From: jime Greeneyes
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: Project number PLN25 20102
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 2:18:52 PM
External Sender - From: (jime Greeneyes
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed new subdivision of homes on Hellman and Walters. As it stands, the density of this development is far too high for the neighborhood, and the original land was not zoned to accommodate this many houses.

Many of us, the original homeowners, conducted our due diligence when we purchased, researching the zoning of all surrounding lots, specifically to avoid a high-density or crowded environment.

It now seems that the landowner, having waited too long to sell, is attempting to recoup his losses by pushing this overcrowded project, regardless of the impact on our quality of life. I urge you to reconsider this development and preserve the safety and comfort of our current residents.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

James Ramirez
3186
From: Miguel Jacobo
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: Project No. PLN25-20102
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 2:34:53 PM
External Sender - From: (Miguel Jacobo
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Hello Planning Commission,
As a resident of the Hearthside community, we strongly oppose the approval of the aforementioned project.

The proposed development will significantly increase traffic volume in an already densely populated area with limited street access. Additionally, a school is located 50 feet from the project site.

Furthermore, there is a lack of adequate sidewalk space parallel to the proposed project.

As a parent of school-age children who attends the nearby elementary school, this development will create an even more unsafe pedestrian pathway for my children to walk to and from school.

Thank you,
Miguel Jacobo
3187
From: Anita Marie
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: Project No PLN25-20102 / Tract Map 39416
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 4:30:53 PM
External Sender - From: (Anita Marie
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Ms. Cerda and City of Eastvale Planning Commission:

I am writing to voice my concerns regarding Project No PLN25- 20102.

In February 2026, Chino Police Chief Kevin Mensen presented his Annual Crime Report to City of Chino council. During this review, he presented the uptick in crime in the
Homecoming complex directly across the street from this proposed project. His report included a rise in calls for domestic disturbances, child neglect, and disturbing the peace. To be more specific, in 2025, Chief Mensen stated the Homecoming had 1,098 calls for police services, averaging 3 calls a day. Within the first 45 days of 2026, that average seemed to be on par with service calls already at 157 for the year, for the same complex.

Research has shown that increased housing density can
increase local crime thereby leading to the strain of local police resources. We would be remiss to believe this
project, just a stone’s throw away, would be an exception to the rule.

Furthermore, the addition of the proposed project across the street from Rondo School of Discovery, (which is already notorious for its frustrating, dangerous, and challenging bottleneck traffic), would most certainly compound issues of illegal parking, blocked driveways, and complications for EMS vehicles that have already been a matter of grave concern in the last year.

I wholeheartedly disagree with Project No PLN25-20102, and do not believe it has a place within our community. I urge the City Planning Commission to thoroughly review the impact this project would have on our neighborhood, and ask you to
decline the progression of this project, or any project similar to it.

Thank you for your time.

Regards,
Anita Brown
3188
3189
From: Elizabeth Ramirez
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: PLN 25 20102
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 3:44:46 PM
External Sender - From: (Elizabeth Ramirez
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Hello,
I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed housing development located at the corner of Walters Street and Hellman Avenue in Eastvale.

While I understand the need for responsible growth and housing opportunities within our city, this particular project raises significant concerns related to density, traffic congestion, public safety, and the overall impact on the surrounding residential community.

One of the primary concerns is the use of density bonus provisions to increase the number of units beyond what many residents expected or believed was appropriate for this area.

Homeowners who purchased property nearby did so with the understanding of the existing zoning and neighborhood character. Many residents carefully researched the area to avoid overly dense or overcrowded developments, and this proposal appears inconsistent with those expectations.

Additionally, traffic conditions in this area are already heavily impacted during peak school and commuter hours. With a school located directly across the street, the addition of a highdensity housing project could substantially worsen congestion, increase delays, and create hazardous conditions for students, parents, pedestrians, bicyclists, and local residents.

Specific concerns include:
• Increased traffic backups during school drop-off and pick-up hours • Reduced visibility and increased risk of accidents near crosswalks and intersections • Overflow street parking affecting nearby neighborhoods • Increased noise and congestion in an already busy corridor • Strain on local infrastructure, schools, and public services • Potential impacts on emergency vehicle access and response times This project also raises broader quality-of-life concerns. Eastvale has grown rapidly over the years, and residents are increasingly worried that continued high-density approvals without sufficient infrastructure improvements will negatively impact the community’s livability and long-term planning goals.

I respectfully request that the City Council carefully reconsider the scale and density of this project and prioritize the safety, traffic realities, and concerns of existing residents before 3190
moving forward. At a minimum, I urge the City to require comprehensive traffic studies, school impact analysis, and meaningful community input before approving any final plans.

Thank you for your time and consideration of these concerns and for your continued service to the residents of Eastvale.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Ramirez
3191
3192
From: Anita Brown
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: Project No PLN25-20102
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 5:11:26 PM
External Sender - From: (Anita Brown
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Ms. Cerda and the City of Eastvale City Council:

I am writing to voice my concerns regarding Project No PLN25-20102.

In February 2026, Chino Police Chief Kevin Mensen presented his Annual Crime Report to City of Chino council. During this review, he presented the uptick in crime in the Homecoming complex directly across the street from this proposed project. His report included a rise in calls for domestic disturbances, child neglect, and disturbing the peace. To be more specific, in 2025, Chief Mensen stated the Homecoming had 1,098 calls for police services, averaging 3 calls a day.

Within the first 45 days of 2026, that average seemed to be on par with service calls already at 157 for the year, for the same complex.

Research has shown that increased housing density can increase local crime thereby leading to the strain of local police resources. We would be remiss to believe this project, just a stone’s throw away, would be an exception to the rule.

Additionally, there have been multiple key case law and legal precedents in the State of California where government entities (cities, counties, and the state) have been held liable for deaths and injuries caused by a dangerous condition, including intersections. A jury awarded millions to the family of a motorcyclist who was killed at an intersection in San Pedro due to parked cars obstructing the view. The city had been made aware of, and failed to correct, the issues and was found at fault. A court awarded over $1 million when a driver was killed at an intersection where the traffic signals were inoperative due to a power outage, finding the city liable for creating a “trap” for motorists and pedestrians.

A motorist losing their life would already be a tragedy. Compound that tragedy when it’s a child or multiple children walking to or from school. Is that really how we want to put our city of Eastvale on the map? And do you want to be part of the decision that made that tragedy occur? 3193
I wholeheartedly disagree with Project No PLN25-20102, and do not believe it has a place within our community. I urge City Council to thoroughly review the impact this project would have on our neighborhood, and the safety of the children at Rondo Elementary, and ask you to decline the progression of this project, or any project similar to it at this location.

Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

Anita M Brown
14840 Bridal Trail Cir
Eastvale, CA
3194
From: Myisha Taylor
To: Jamie Cerda
Subject: Project PLN25-20102 – Traffic, Parking, Pedestrian Safety, and Emergency Access Concerns Near Rondo Elementary School
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 6:35:27 PM
External Sender - From: (Myisha Taylor
<[email protected]>)
This message came from outside your organization.

Dear Members of the Eastvale City Council,
I am writing to express my opposition to Project PLN25-20102, which proposes the development of 35 additional homes at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street.

I am a resident whose home is located adjacent to Rondo Elementary School, near the corner crosswalk used daily by students and families. While I understand the need for responsible development within our city, I believe this project will significantly worsen existing traffic, parking, pedestrian safety, and emergency access issues that already impact residents on a daily basis.

Each school day, the area surrounding Rondo Elementary experiences severe congestion during morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up periods. A significant contributing factor is the design of the surrounding neighborhood and roadway network, which provides very limited access to the school area. Traffic primarily enters from Hellman Avenue onto Walters Street or from Ella Drive onto Walters Street, creating bottlenecks that routinely back up traffic in multiple directions.

During peak periods, vehicles line both sides of Walters Street, creating conditions where residents can become effectively trapped in their neighborhoods. It is not uncommon for drivers traveling on Hellman Avenue to be unable to make a left turn onto Walters Street because traffic is already backed up from both directions.

Residents frequently experience long delays simply trying to access or leave their homes.

Because Rondo Elementary operates on a year-round schedule, these impacts are not limited to a traditional school year. Residents receive very little relief from the traffic and parking congestion because school-related activity occurs throughout most of the calendar year.

In addition to congestion, residents routinely experience:

Parents and visitors parking in front of or partially blocking residential driveways.

Vehicles stopping in driveways while waiting for students.

Drivers becoming confrontational when residents ask them to move so that 3195
homeowners can access their property.

Vehicles parking in front of trash containers on collection days, preventing waste collection.

Trash containers being moved onto sidewalks or in front of driveways, creating accessibility issues.

Children and other pedestrians being forced to walk in the street when sidewalks become obstructed, creating an avoidable safety hazard.

These conditions already create frustration, conflict, and safety concerns for both residents and students. Tempers frequently run high because the area lacks adequate infrastructure to accommodate the volume of school-related traffic.

My home is located on one of the most heavily impacted corners near the school’s crosswalk. Because of its proximity to the school entrance, drivers frequently seek parking in the immediate area to minimize their walking distance. As a result, residents in this location bear a disproportionate share of the congestion, parking conflicts, and access issues associated with school operations.

As a resident located adjacent to the crosswalk, I regularly observe children crossing between parked vehicles, drivers making U-turns, vehicles stopping unexpectedly, and increased vehicle-pedestrian interactions during peak school hours. These conditions already create safety concerns for students, parents, residents, and motorists. Any increase in traffic volume near an elementary school crosswalk should be carefully evaluated from a public safety perspective before additional residential development is approved.

Adding 35 additional homes will inevitably introduce more vehicles into an area that is already operating beyond its practical capacity during peak school hours.

Furthermore, residents have not been provided sufficient information regarding the anticipated traffic and parking impacts associated with this development. I am also concerned that any future changes to the project could result in higher-density housing, such as townhomes or condominiums, which would likely generate even greater parking and traffic demands than currently anticipated.

I am also concerned about emergency access. During school drop-off and pick-up periods, traffic congestion and vehicles parked throughout the neighborhood can create significant delays and obstacles. Any condition that impedes emergency responders from reaching residents, students, or school staff in a timely manner should be carefully evaluated before additional housing is approved in the area.

Rather than approving additional residential development, I urge the City Council to first address the existing traffic and parking deficiencies surrounding Rondo Elementary School. Potential solutions could include:

Development of additional parking facilities for parents and visitors.

Evaluation of the project site as a potential location for school-related parking improvements.

Consideration of the vacant lot adjacent to the wash and playground area as an alternative location for expanded parking.

Improved traffic management during drop-off and pick-up periods. 3196
Dedicated traffic control personnel during peak school hours.

A comprehensive traffic and parking study that evaluates actual conditions experienced by residents rather than relying solely on projected vehicle counts.

I have previously contacted the City regarding these issues and was advised to contact the Sheriff’s Department when parking violations occur. While enforcement may address individual incidents, it does not solve the underlying infrastructure problem. The recurring congestion and parking shortages require a long-term solution rather than a case-by-case enforcement response.

The public notice states that the project qualifies for a CEQA Section 15183 exemption because it allegedly would not create new or more severe impacts than those previously evaluated. I respectfully request that the City Council carefully evaluate whether the project’s traffic, parking, pedestrian safety, and emergency access impacts—particularly those affecting an active elementary school and the surrounding residential neighborhood—have been fully analyzed and whether the conclusion that no additional environmental review is necessary accurately reflects the realities currently experienced by residents.

I also urge the City Council not to rely solely on projected traffic models or engineering assumptions. Instead, I encourage City staff and decision-makers to conduct on-site observations during a typical school drop-off and pick-up period to witness firsthand the congestion, blocked driveways, parking conflicts, pedestrian safety concerns, and access challenges experienced by residents on a daily basis.

Direct observation of existing conditions would provide a more accurate representation of the impacts already affecting the neighborhood and help determine whether additional residential development can be supported safely and responsibly.

I respectfully request that the City Council deny or postpone approval of Project PLN25-20102 until the existing traffic, parking, pedestrian safety, emergency access, and school-related congestion issues surrounding Rondo Elementary School have been adequately addressed and meaningful mitigation measures have been identified. Existing residents should not be asked to absorb additional impacts when the current roadway and parking infrastructure is already struggling to safely accommodate existing demand.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to the residents of Eastvale.

Sincerely,
Myisha Taylor
Cell: 626-641-2220
7483 Silver Saddle CT
Eastvale, CA 92880
3197
3198

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 13.1
June 24, 2026
SB 707 Compliance: Adop-on of a Technology Disrup-on Policy and Outreach Policy
Prepared By:

Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolu!on regarding a Technology Disrup!on Policy in compliance with Government Code Section 54953.4; and

2. Adopt a Resolu!on determining "reasonable efforts" for outreach to encourage par!cipa!on in City Council meetings under Government Code Section 54953.4.

Summary
Senate Bill 707 (SB 707, 2025) updates teleconferencing and accessibility requirements under the Brown Act, including new provisions related to remote par!cipa!on and public access to mee!ngs.

By July 1, 2026, "eligible legisla!ve bodies" must adopt policies addressing technology disrup!ons and defining reasonable efforts for outreach to encourage public par!cipa!on, par!cularly among underrepresented and non-English-speaking communities.

Background
The Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.) establishes requirements for open mee!ngs of local legisla!ve bodies. SB 707 updates provisions related to teleconferencing, including requirements for remote par!cipa!on, accessibility, and procedures for addressing disrup!ons to meeting access for City Council meetings.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3199
One change SB 707 made is to require "eligible legisla!ve bodies" to allow remote par!cipa!on in mee!ngs by members of the public. SB 707 requires those eligible legisla!ve bodies to adopt a technology disrup!on policy and to determine what cons!tutes reasonable efforts for outreach to encourage public par!cipa!on in mee!ngs, par!cularly among underrepresented and non-Englishspeaking communi!es. These policies must be adopted by July 1, 2026. The City Council is an "eligible legisla!ve body" under SB 707. The City's commissions are not, therefore, the proposed policies are only applicable to City Council meetings.

Technology Disruption Policy
Government Code § 54953.4 requires the City Council to adopt, by July 1, 2026, a technology disrup!on policy. The policy must address procedures for responding to disrup!ons of telephonic or internet service during a mee!ng and the efforts the legisla!ve body will make to restore service.

The statute further requires that if a disrup!on occurs that prevents members of the public from observing or par!cipa!ng in a City Council mee!ng through the two-way telephonic or audiovisual pla?orm, the City Council must recess the open session for at least one hour and make a good faith effort to restore service. During this !me, the City Council may meet in closed session, as permi@ed by law.

The City Council may not reconvene open session un!l at least one hour has passed or service has been restored, whichever occurs first. If service has not been restored upon reconvening, the City Council must make findings by roll call vote that good faith efforts were made to restore access and that the public interest in con!nuing the mee!ng outweighs the public interest in providing remote access. Alternatively, the meeting may be adjourned.

The proposed policy incorporates these requirements and establishes procedures to ensure transparency and con!nuity of mee!ngs in the event of a technology disrup!on during a City Council meeting, while maintaining flexibility to respond based on the specific circumstances.

Reasonable Efforts for Outreach
Government Code § 54953.4 requires the City Council to determine and adopt what cons!tutes “reasonable efforts” to encourage par!cipa!on in City Council mee!ngs, par!cularly among underrepresented communities and non-English-speaking communities.

The proposed resolu!on establishes the City’s approach to outreach, which may include invi!ng par!cipa!on in City Council mee!ngs from media organiza!ons serving the City, including those serving non-English-speaking communi!es, as well as civic, neighborhood, community-based, civil rights, and good government organizations.

The statute provides the City Council with broad discre!on in defining these reasonable efforts and clarifies that failure to provide no!ce to any specific group does not create a basis for legal ac!on.

The proposed policy is intended to provide flexibility while suppor!ng expanded public awareness and participation.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the proposed resolutions.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Resolution Adopting SB 707 Service Disruption Policy Attachment 2 - SB 707 Disruption Policy
Attachment 3 - Resolution Determining Reasonable Efforts to Encourage Public Participation 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3201
4904-5496-8493 v1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING A POLICY ADDRESSING DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET

SERVICE DURING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.) establishes requirements for open and public meetings of local legislative bodies; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to update teleconferencing and accessibility requirements, including provisions related to remote participation in public meetings of “eligible legislative bodies,” including city council meetings, through a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform; and WHEREAS, Government Code § 54953.4(b)(1)(A) requires eligible legislative bodies, on or before July 1, 2026, to adopt at a noticed public meeting in open session, and not on the consent calendar, a policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service during meetings where remote access is required; and WHEREAS, the required policy must address procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of a disruption and the efforts the legislative body will make to attempt to restore service; and
WHEREAS, Government Code § 54953.4 further requires that, in the event of a disruption preventing members of the public from observing or participating in the meeting through a two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform, the legislative body shall recess the open session for at least one hour and make a good faith effort to restore service, and may not reconvene open session until at least one hour has passed or service has been restored, whichever occurs first; and
WHEREAS, if telephonic or internet service has not been restored upon reconvening, the legislative body must make findings by roll call vote that good faith efforts to restore service have been made and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access; and WHEREAS, the City Council is the City’s only “eligible legislative body” under Senate Bill 707; and
WHEREAS, adoption of a technology disruption policy is required to ensure compliance with state law and to promote transparency and continuity of city council meetings; and
3202
4904-5496-8493 v1
WHEREAS, the proposed policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service during meetings of the City Council has been prepared in accordance with Government Code § 54953.4 and is attached hereto as Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3), no environmental review is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Adoption of Policy. The City Council hereby adopts the policy entitled “Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings,” substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

SECTION 2. Implementation. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to implement the policy in coordination with agency staff, legal counsel, and technology support staff, as appropriate.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this XX day of Month, 2026. __________________________________________
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
3203
4904-5496-8493 v1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 26-XX, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the XX day of Month 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
3204
4910-4983-9277 v1
Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings Background
Senate Bill No. 707 (2025) (“SB 707”) amended the Brown Act to require “eligible legislative bodies” to offer remote public access for public meetings of the eligible legislative body through either (1) two-way telephonic service or (2) two-way audiovisual platforms. Pursuant to SB 707, the City Council of the City of Eastvale (“City Council”) is an “eligible legislative body” and is required to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from attending or observing a public meeting of the City Council remotely.

Purpose
This policy is adopted to comply with SB 707 and to ensure continuity of public participation during technical disruptions. This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the City of Eastvale City Council as required by the Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and continuity of government during technology disruptions.

Definitions
For purposes of this policy:
 “Disruption” means any failure, outage, or other interruption of the City’s telephonic or internet service that prevents members of the public from attending or observing an open, public meeting of the City Council via these remote access services.  “Remote access services” means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platform used to provide real-time remote public attendance and observation of open, public meetings of the City Council.

Applicability
This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the City Council at which remote public participation is required under the Brown Act (Government Code Section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(ia)), but does not apply in those circumstances where the Brown Act provides that remote public access is not required.

Procedures in the Event of a Service Disruption

1. Response to Service Disruption
If the Presiding Officer or Clerk becomes aware of a disruption to the agency’s remote access services that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely then the following steps must be taken:
3205
4910-4983-9277 v1

1.1 The Presiding Officer or Clerk shall immediately announce the disruption to the public.

1.2 The Presiding Officer shall recess the open session of the meeting.

1.3 Staff shall begin efforts to diagnose and restore the remote access service.

1.4 The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner.

1.5 During recess, the City Council may meet in closed session as permitted by Government Code Section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(ib)(Ib).

2. Efforts to Restore Service
The agency shall make good faith efforts to restore remote access services, which may include:
 Troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software  Resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment
 Attempting alternative connection methods
 Contacting necessary support staff or service providers  Switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available Reconvening the Open Session

1. Timing
The open session may be reconvened after at least one hour has elapsed from the time of disruption or as soon as service is restored, whichever occurs earlier.

2. If Remote Access Service Is Restored
If the remote access service is restored before or at the time the meeting reconvenes, the meeting shall continue as normal.

3. If Remote Access Service Is Not Restored
If remote access service has not been restored after one hour, the City Council may reconvene and either adjourn the meeting or continue the meeting in open session by adopting, by roll call vote, the following, or a substantially similar, finding:
“The City Council has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access.”
Upon adoption of the finding, the City Council may continue the open session despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored.

Recordkeeping
The Clerk shall make a record of the efforts made to restore remote access service and enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including the following:
3206
4910-4983-9277 v1
 The nature and time of the disruption
 The restoration efforts undertaken
 The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable)
 Any finding adopted pursuant to Section 3 of Reconvening the Open Session.

Review and Updates
This policy may be amended by the City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session, not on the consent calendar as required by Government Code Section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(ib)(Ia).
3207
4927-8326-6989 v1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA,

DETERMINING REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 54953.4 WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code § 54950 et seq.) establishes requirements for open and public meetings of local legislative bodies; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to include additional requirements intended to encourage participation in public meetings of “eligible legislative bodies”, particularly among communities that do not traditionally participate in public meetings and non-English-speaking communities; and WHEREAS, the City Council is the only “eligible legislative body” of the City of Eastvale; and
WHEREAS, Government Code § 54953.4(b)(3)(C) requires the City Council to determine and make reasonable efforts to invite groups that do not traditionally participate in public meetings to attend city council meetings; and WHEREAS, such reasonable efforts may include outreach to media organizations serving the jurisdiction, including those serving non-English-speaking communities, as well as civic, neighborhood, community-based, civil rights, and good government organizations; and
WHEREAS, Government Code § 54953.4(b)(3)(C)(ii) provides eligible legislative bodies with broad discretion in determining appropriate reasonable efforts and clarifies that no action shall arise from failing to provide notice to any specific group; and WHEREAS, the city committed to promoting transparency, accessibility, and broad public participation in its public meetings; and
WHEREAS, the city currently uses a variety of communication methods to inform the public of meetings and opportunities to participate; and WHEREAS, the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3), no environmental review is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
3208
4927-8326-6989 v1
SECTION 1. Determination of reasonable efforts. The City Council determines the following to constitute reasonable efforts to encourage participation in city council meetings pursuant to Government Code § 54953.4(b)(3)(C):

1. Media outreach. The City of Eastvale may include media organizations serving the jurisdiction, including media organizations serving non-English-speaking communities, in the distribution of meeting agendas, notices, or other meeting-related information, as appropriate.

2. Electronic access and agenda subscriptions. The City of Eastvale shall maintain methods for members of the public to access meeting agendas and related materials electronically, including through the city’s website or other regular agenda-posting platform. Where available, the city may also provide options for members of the public to subscribe to receive meeting agendas, notices, or other updates.

3. Multilingual communication. The city may use multilingual communication methods to increase awareness of meetings and participation opportunities, including translated agendas, translated meeting instructions, multilingual social media posts, website notices, or other communication tools, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law and available resources.

4. Community and organizational outreach. The city may provide meeting information through existing communication channels and partnerships with community-based organizations, neighborhood groups, civic organizations, civil rights organizations, good government organizations, and organizations serving non-English-speaking communities, as opportunities arise and consistent with available resources.

5. Use of existing communication channels. The city may use existing outreach methods to share meeting information and participation opportunities, including, but not limited to, the agency website, email notifications, agenda subscription services, newsletters, social media platforms, public counters, bulletin boards, community meetings, and other established communication tools
SECTION 2. Flexible framework. The efforts identified in this resolution are intended to provide a flexible framework for outreach and public participation. The city may modify, expand, or adjust its outreach methods over time based on available resources, evolving communication practices, changes in technology, and the needs of the community. The city is not required to utilize all of the reasonable efforts listed in Section 1 for every public meeting of the city council.

SECTION 3. No requirement to provide notice to any specific group. Consistent with Government Code section 54953.4(b)(3)(C)(ii), this resolution does not require notice to any specific group or organization, and no action shall arise from the failure to provide notice to any specific group or organization.
3209
4927-8326-6989 v1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this XX day of Month, 2026. __________________________________________
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
3210
4927-8326-6989 v1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
3211

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 13.2
June 24, 2026
Supporting Local Businesses Through Construction Program Prepared By:

Mollie Corrao, Communications Officer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council discuss and provide direcon on the Supporng Local Businesses Through Construction Program.

Summary
The “Supporng Local Businesses Through Construcon” proposal establishes a City-led program designed to help businesses remain visible and accessible during construcon projects that may disrupt customer traffic, parking, and overall operaons. The program provides businesses with temporary City-approved signage, including building-mounted banners and window decals, to help communicate that businesses remain open during construcon while ensuring compliance with local regulaons. In addion, the City will offer a social media support package featuring customized graphics, suggested messaging, and promoonal materials to help businesses share updates regarding access points, parking, business hours, and ongoing operations.

Background
Construcon projects, whether iniated by the City or private enes, are essenal for community growth and infrastructure improvements. However, these projects o,en create unintended challenges for nearby businesses, including reduced visibility, limited customer access, parking disrupons, and decreased foot traffic. Small and local businesses are especially vulnerable during construcon periods because even short-term interrupons can significantly impact daily operaons and revenue.

Recognizing these challenges, the Communicaons team developed the “Supporng Local 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3212
Businesses Through Construcon” program to proacvely assist businesses impacted by ongoing construcon acvity. The program is designed to ensure that businesses can connue communicang effecvely with customers while remaining compliant with City regulaons regarding temporary signage and advertising.

The proposal emphasizes Eastvale’s commitment to being a business-friendly city by providing praccal tools that help businesses remain visible and accessible during periods of disrupon. In addion to physical signage, the City plans to offer coordinated digital communicaon support, allowing businesses to share mely updates regarding access routes, parking availability, business hours, and ongoing operaons. This coordinated effort helps create clear and consistent messaging throughout the community while reducing the burden on small businesses to create markeng materials on their own.

The program also establishes a structured approval and operaons process involving the Communicaons Division, the Economic Development Division, Building Division, Planning Division, and Code Enforcement Division to ensure all materials remain compliant with City standards.

Through this collaborave approach, Eastvale aims to strengthen economic resilience and support local businesses during periods of temporary hardship caused by construction activities.

Analysis
Not applicable.

Environmental
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: B | Goal #: D Target B, Goal D: Develop strategies for business retention, business support, and business reward Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the program is relavely minimal, with an esmated inial startup cost of $1,175. These costs would be covered by the Communicaons Division through the services and supplies budget in the General Fund (100-260-6510). The expenses primarily include the producon of temporary signage materials for participating businesses.

The proposed expenditures include:
10 large building-mounted banners (10 ft x 3 ft) at $60 each, totaling $600 10 medium building-mounted banners (6 ft x 3 ft) at $37.50 each, totaling $375 50 window decals (1 ft x 1 ft) at $4 each, totaling $200 Together, these materials bring the total esmated startup cost to $1,175. The proposal notes that parcipang businesses will be responsible for the installaon, maintenance, and removal of signage, which helps minimize ongoing operational costs to the City.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
During the Budget Workshop on April 22, 2026, the City Council directed staff to explore ways to support local restaurants and boost business retenon acvies. In response to the City Council's 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3213
feedback, this program was developed in consultaon with the City's Economic Development Division.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Supporting Businesses Through Construction Proposal.pdf 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3214

SUPPORTING
LOCAL

BUSINESSES

THROUGH

CONSTRUCTION
3215
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction
Project Summary
Construction, whether initiated by the City or by private businesses, can significantly impact visibility, access, and customer traffic for local businesses. To help mitigate these challenges, this proposal outlines a proactive support program designed to assist businesses throughout the duration of construction activities.

This initiative focuses on two key areas:

1.Compliant signage support

2.Coordinated digital communication resources.

Program Components

1. City-Approved Signage
To ensure businesses maintain visibility while remaining compliant with local regulations, the City will offer temporary signage to local businesses.

Businesses may temporarily check out City-branded signage designed specifically for construction-impacted locations.

All signage will be pre-approved by Building, Planning, Code Enforcement, and the Communications Division to ensure full compliance with Eastvale regulations.

This reduces the risk of businesses being cited for non-compliant temporary signage while still allowing them to effectively communicate with customers.

Highlights Eastvale as a business-friendly, business-first city.

2.Social Media Package
To complement physical signage efforts, the City will provide a ready-to-use digital communication toolkit.
3216
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction
Pre-designed social media graphics and templates
Suggested messaging to inform customers about:

1. Ongoing construction

2. Continued business operations

3. Access points

4. Parking updates

5. Hours
Reduces the burden on small businesses to create their own content Promotes consistent, clear messaging across the community Eligibility

1.Eligibility
Businesses must provide:

Active permit number (if construction is initiated by business, and not outside agency such as the City, school district, water district, etc.) Valid Eastvale business registration/license number
Must fill out an application and return it to the city in a timely manner Program Promotion

1.Program Promotion
The program will be highlighted using:

Social media like Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn
Located on the city’s website under the business tab
Economic Development and city newsletter
3217
Temporary Signage Options
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction

1.Building-Mounted Banners
To provide flexible, highly visible, and compliant signage solutions, the program will offer two types of temporary signage: building-mounted banners and window decals. Each option is designed to support businesses while adhering to City regulations.

Building-Mounted banners are intended to provide high-visibility messaging for businesses impacted by construction.

Specifications and Guidelines
Available sizes

1.10 feet x 3 feet = $60 each

2.6 feet x 3 feet = $37.50 each
Businesses may display banners for up to 30 consecutive days from the date of installation. After the 30-day period, banners must be returned to the City.

Businesses may re-checkout a banner after a 30-day waiting period following return, if construction impacts persist.

Business may check out up to four banners and 2 decals per 30-day period. 3218
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction

2.Window Decals
Window decals provide a more immediate, storefront-level solution to communicate with customers at the point of entry.

Specifications and Guidelines
Available sizes

1.12 inches x 12 inches = $4 each
Window decals must be applied directly to business windows or doors Decals may not cover more than 25% of the total window area Businesses may display decals for up to 90 consecutive days from the date of installation. After the 90-day period, decals must be removed. They do not need to be returned to the City.

Each business is eligible to check out decals one time per construction project. 3219
Social Media Package Options
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction

1.Social Media Support Package
To complement physical signage efforts, the City will provide a ready-to-use digital communication toolkit.

Post will be specialized to include
photos of specific business
Package will include 4
specialized social media posts
3220
Operations
Applications will be submitted to the Communications Division for initial intake and review.

Communications will route completed applications to the following divisions for review and approval:
a.Building Division
b.Planning Division
c.Code Enforcement
Once all approvals are obtained, the application will be marked as approved, and the business will be notified.

Upon approval, the Communications Division will coordinate with the applicant to arrange signage pickup and distribution of the social media support package.

Once issued, the Communications Division will set a 30-day calendar reminder and will reach out to businesses to let them know their 30 days has come to an end. They will have 10 business days to return the materials.

Inventory will be kept at the Citrus property in properly sealed containers.

Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction

1.Application Approval

2.Program Expenditures
The Communications Division will inheret the costs associated with the production of building-mounted banners and window decals. Costs will be charged to the services and supplies budget (100-260-6510.)
Initial set up costs will be as follows:
3221
Conclusion
Supporting Local Businesses
Through Construction
Construction is a necessary part of growth, but it should not come at the expense of local businesses. This program ensures that Eastvale supports its business community not just in times of success, but during periods of challenge.

By combining compliant signage with strategic communication resources, the City can help businesses remain visible, accessible, and connected to their customers. This initiative reflects Eastvale’s commitment to economic vitality and reinforces its reputation as a city that actively supports its local business community.

Participating businesses will be responsible for the proper installation, maintenance, and removal of all signage provided through the program.

3.Installation
Window Decals
1 ft x 1 ft $4 each
Amount
50 Total Cost
$200
Total Cost: $1,175
Building-Mounted Banners
10 ft x 3 ft
6 ft x 3 ft
$60 each
$37.50 each
Amount
10 10
Total Cost
$600
$375
3222

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 13.3
June 24, 2026
Update to Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual
Prepared By:

Maricela Mejia, Assistant Human Resources & Risk Management Director Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resoluon amending the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual.

Summary
The Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (Manual) establishes the framework for employee rights, responsibilies, and workplace expectaons. It promotes consistency, fairness, and compliance with applicable laws while supporng an effecve and producve work environment.

The Manual also provides employees with clear guidance regarding policies, benefits, and obligations.

Background
The City Council has adopted a Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual applicable to all City Employees. The Human Resources & Risk Management Division, along with the City A-orney’s Office, periodically bring edits to the City Council for consideraon. The last Manual was revised on January 1, 2025.

Major Revisions:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EXTENSION:

Current Policy: The current policy allows for extension of a performance evaluaon period when an employee takes a leave of absence, but does not clearly define when or how extensions are applied.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3223
Proposed Policy: Clarifies when performance evaluaon periods will be extended.

Unpaid leave will extend the evaluaon period by the number of days of the absence.

Paid leave exceeding twenty (20) consecuve working days will also result in a corresponding extension. These changes align with exisng probaonary extension provisions.

PERSONAL APPEARANCE, GROOMING, AND DRESS CODE:

Proposed Policy: Clarifies and expands examples of inappropriate workplace a>re to be-er reflect professional standards, including hats for in-office staff, Crocs, and slippers.

SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUM PAY:

Proposed Policy: Clarifies that non-exempt employees who work special events during a workweek in which a City-observed holiday occurs will receive premium pay at one and one-half (1.5) times their regular rate of pay.

CALL-BACK & ON-CALL PREMIUM PAY :

Proposed Policy: Clarifies that non-exempt employees who perform call-back or on-call work during a workweek in which a City-observed holiday occurs will receive premium pay at one and one-half (1.5) times their regular rate of pay.

HOLIDAY WORK:

Current Policy: Employees working on a holiday or the observed holiday are compensated at their regular rate of pay.

Proposed Policy: Provides that employees working on the actual or observed holiday will be compensated at one and one-half (1.5) mes their regular rate of pay. This is specific to work on Marn Luther Kind Jr. Day, President’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, or Labor Day.

NEGOTIATION OF SALARY FOR EXTERNAL RECRUITMENTS :

Current Policy: Employees compeng in an external recruitment receive the entrance rate of the new salary range or a five percent (5%) increase, whichever is greater.

Proposed Policy: Allows employees compeng in an external recruitment to negoate a salary within the approved salary range. The selected employee will receive at least the entrance rate of the new range or a five percent (5%) increase, whichever is greater.

RENAMING OF MANAGEMENT LEAVE TO EXEMPT EMPLOYEE LEAVE:

Current Policy: Historically, exempt classificaons have been labeled as “management” and have received management leave to recognize the demands of exempt posions and their ineligibility for overme. This terminology can create confusion by implying that all exempt employees have managerial authority or are at-will employees, which does not reflect the City’s current classification structure.

Proposed Policy: Renames “management leave” to “exempt employee leave” to more accurately reflect the purpose of the benefit. The leave is intended to recognize the demands of exempt posions and their ineligibility for overme, rather than to denote managerial authority. To further clarify employee classificaons, Appendices A, B, and C disnguish between at-will execuve, at-will management, and classified nonmanagerial exempt posions. While these groups differ in authority and employment status, all remain eligible for exempt employee leave.

Environmental
Not applicable.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3224
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: G | Goal #: N/A Organizational Development
Fiscal Impact
The total fiscal impact for the proposed changes is $11,343.14; all personnel costs are budgeted within the General Fund within each department's budget. For the "Salary Negoaon for External Recruitments," the fiscal impact is difficult to predict because salary negoaons are evaluated on a case-by-case basis depending on the candidate's qualificaons, educaon, and experience. For vacant posions, the City budgets at the top step to maintain flexibility for negoaons. For midyear vacancies, potenal increases can typically be offset through vacancy savings or adjustments within exisng budgets. This approach is consistent with the City's current compensaon and budgeting practices.

The table below highlights the fiscal impact associated with each proposed change.

Premium Pay Fiscal Impact
Special Events Premium Pay $6,396.26
On-Call & Call-Back Premium Pay $1,491.95
Work on Holidays Premium Pay $3,454.93
Total Fiscal Impact $11,343.14
There is sufficient budget allocated for the proposed changes in FY 2026-27.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
The City Council first adopted the City’s Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual in 2013 by Resoluon 13-14. Ten revisions have occurred since then, with the most recent occurring on January 1, 2025, by Resolution 24-67.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1-Resolution Amending Personnel Policies & Procedures Manual.pdf Attachment 2- Personnel Policies & Procedures Manual Eff. 07.01.2026.pdf Attachment 3-Redline Personnel Policies & Procedures Manual 07.01.2026.pdf 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
3225
4892-8457-6447 v1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY’S PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale’s Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (“Personnel Rules”) is the official document containing the employment policies of the City; and WHEREAS, the Personnel Rules is a living document that is reviewed and updated as necessary or desirable to ensure the City’s employment policies are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and to ensure the City is able to attract and retain top talent; and
WHEREAS, the Personnel Rules were last updated on January 1, 2025, by Resolution 24-67 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Eastvale does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as a material part of this resolution
SECTION 2. The Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference is adopted and shall take effect on July 1, 2026. Any and all prior approved versions of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual shall no longer be of any force and effect as of June 30, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2026.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
__________________________________________
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
3226
4892-8457-6447 v1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 26-__, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the 24
th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
3227
4914-0678-2125 v4

CITY OF EASTVALE PERSONNEL

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANUAL
July 1, 2026
Adopted by Resolution 13-14
Revised by Resolution 15-01
Revised by Resolution 17-69
Revised by Resolution 17-75
Revised by Resolution 18-12
Revised by Resolution 18-41
Revised by Resolution 18-69
Revised by Resolution 19-27
Revised by Resolution 21-02
Revised by Resolution 23-54
Revised by Resolution 24-27
Revised by Resolution 24-67
Revised by Resolution 26-XX
3228
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 ORGANIZATION ........................................................................................................................2 DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 1 - EMPLOYMENT ...................................................................................................6 SECTION 1.1 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY .................................................6 SECTION 1.2 POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION..........................................................................................6 SECTION 1.3 DISABLED APPLICANTS AND EMPLOYEES..........................................6 SECTION 1.4 ACCOMMODATION FOR SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEF .................................................................................................................7 SECTION 1.5 LACTATION ACCOMMODATION ............................................................8 SECTION 1.6 RECRUITMENT/SELECTION OF EMPLOYEES ......................................9 SECTION 1.7 MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS....................................................................12 SECTION 1.8 NEPOTISM AND CONSENSUAL ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS ..........13 SECTION 1.9 PROBATION...........................................................................................17 SECTION 1.10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT PLANS........................................................................18 SECTION 1.11 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT, ACTIVITY, OR ENTERPRISE / CONFLICT OF INTEREST.....................................................................19 SECTION 1.12 TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES................................................................21 SECTION 1.13 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES.............................22 SECTION 1.14 USE OF CAMERAS, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE, AND GPS SYSTEMS..............................................................................................22 SECTION 1.15 USE OF CITY TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES.................................22 SECTION 1.16 MANAGEMENT PREROGATIVES .......................................................22 SECTION 1.17 ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS....................................................................23 SECTION 1.18 REMOTE WORK ..................................................................................23 SECTION 1.19 EMPLOYEE’S HOME ADDRESS AND STATUS OF DRIVER’S LICENSE – DUTY TO UPDATE.............................................................23 SECTION 1.20 PERSONAL APPEARANCE, GROOMING AND DRESS CODE ..........24 SECTION 1.21 NEWS MEDIA RELATIONS..................................................................25 SECTION 1.22 ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY....................................................25 SECTION 1.23 TOBACCO, E-CIGARETTE, VAPING POLICY.....................................26 SECTION 1.24 PERSONNEL RECORDS.....................................................................27 3229
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 ii
CHAPTER 2 – CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION......................................................30 SECTION 2.1 EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATIONS/AUTHORIZED POSITIONS................30 SECTION 2.2 WORKWEEK AND SCHEDULES...........................................................31 SECTION 2.3 PAYROLL PROCESSING.......................................................................33 SECTION 2.4 REST AND MEAL PERIODS – NON-EXEMPT (HOURLY) EMPLOYEES.........................................................................................35 SECTION 2.5 OVERTIME COMPENSATION/COMPENSATORY TIME OFF...............35 SECTION 2.6 BI-LINGUAL PAY....................................................................................36 SECTION 2.7 TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENTS ..............................................................37 SECTION 2.8 CALL BACK PAY....................................................................................38 SECTION 2.9 ON CALL (STANDBY) PAY ....................................................................38 SECTION 2.10 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE ...............................................................38 SECTION 2.11 PHONE ALLOWANCE..........................................................................39 SECTION 2.12 SALARY AND WAGE SCHEDULES.....................................................39 SECTION 2.13 ADVANCEMENT WITHIN THE SCHEDULE.........................................39 SECTION 2.14 CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT STATUS...............................................40 SECTION 2.15 TRAVEL EXPENSES............................................................................41 SECTION 2.16 EDUCATIONAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT...................................41 CHAPTER 3 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ......................................................................................43 SECTION 3.1 HOLIDAYS..............................................................................................43 SECTION 3.2 WINTER HOLIDAY CLOSURE...............................................................43 SECTION 3.3 INSURANCE BENEFITS ........................................................................44 SECTION 3.4 RETIREMENT BENEFITS ......................................................................46 SECTION 3.5 TEMPORARY PART-TIME EMPLOYEES ..............................................48 CHAPTER 4 - LEAVE OF ABSENCE ......................................................................................49 SECTION 4.1 GENERAL INFORMATION.....................................................................49 SECTION 4.2 VACATION .............................................................................................49 SECTION 4.3 SICK LEAVE...........................................................................................51 SECTION 4.4 FAMILY CARE AND MEDICAL LEAVE; PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE; MILITARY FAMILY LEAVE .......................................................52 SECTION 4.5 CIVIL AIR PATROL LEAVE ....................................................................52 SECTION 4.6 CRIME VICTIMS’ LEAVE........................................................................53 SECTION 4.7 VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR SEXUAL ASSAULT...............53 SECTION 4.8 MILITARY LEAVE...................................................................................53 SECTION 4.9 ORGAN AND BONE MARROW DONATION LEAVE..............................53 3230
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 iii
SECTION 4.10 SCHOOL ACTIVITIES/SCHOOL APPEARANCE LEAVE.....................54 SECTION 4.11 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS, RESERVE

PEACE OFFICERS, AND EMERGENCY RESCUE PERSONNEL
LEAVE 55
SECTION 4.12 VOTING LEAVE....................................................................................55 SECTION 4.13 PERSONAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY.............................55 SECTION 4.14 JURY DUTY OR WITNESS APPEARANCE LEAVE.............................56 SECTION 4.15 EXEMPT EMPLOYEE LEAVE .................Error! Bookmark not defined.

SECTION 4.16 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE ......................................................................58 SECTION 4.17 REPRODUCTIVE LOSS LEAVE...........................................................58 SECTION 4.18 INDUSTRIAL ILLNESS AND/OR INJURY LEAVE ................................59 SECTION 4.19 FITNESS FOR DUTY LEAVE AND EXAMINATION .............................60 CHAPTER 5 – EMPLOYEE CONDUCT, DISCIPLINE AND DISCIPLINARY APPEALS .........62 SECTION 5.1 GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT ..........................................................62 SECTION 5.2 TYPES OF DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS....................................................62 SECTION 5.3 GROUNDS FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION .............................................63 SECTION 5.4 DISCIPLINING AUTHORITY...................................................................65 SECTION 5.5 MAJOR AND MINOR DISCIPLINE .........................................................65 SECTION 5.6 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES.............................................................66 SECTION 5.7 APPEAL PROCEDURES........................................................................68 SECTION 5.8 PLACEMENT ON PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE PENDING DETERMINATION OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION....................................70 SECTION 5.9 TIME EXTENSIONS ...............................................................................71 SECTION 5.10 DELIVERY OF NOTICES .....................................................................71 SECTION 5.11 DISCIPLINARY RECORDS ..................................................................71 CHAPTER 6 – EMPLOYEE SAFETY.......................................................................................72 SECTION 6.1 DRUG- AND ALCOHOL-FREE WORKPLACE .......................................72 SECTION 6.2 EMPLOYEE SAFETY .............................................................................72 CHAPTER 7 – SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT AND FURLOUGH................................74 SECTION 7.1 RESIGNATION/RETIREMENT ...............................................................74 SECTION 7.2 LAYOFF..................................................................................................74 SECTION 7.3 ABANDONMENT OF EMPLOYMENT ....................................................76 SECTION 7.4 FURLOUGH AND REDUCTION OF HOURS..........................................76 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT.....................................................................................81 3231
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 1

INTRODUCTION
This Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual (“Manual”) applies to all employees of the City of Eastvale (“City”) and to others as indicated. An “employee” is generally defined as an individual whose work is within the usual course of the City’s business, and directed and controlled, or is subject to the direction or control, by the City with respect to the final results of the work and the details of when, where and how the work is to be done. This Manual contains Employment Policies of the City. Each City employee is responsible for knowing and understanding its contents. In addition, each City employee is responsible for knowing, understanding, and adhering to any specific departmental policy.

Violations of the provisions of this Manual may be addressed as a performance matter and be grounds for disciplinary action. A violation will not make disciplinary action mandatory but will be given such weight as the City determines to be appropriate in view of all the circumstances Except as otherwise provided, any duties, responsibilities, powers, and authority granted by this Manual or the Personnel Ordinance to any person may be delegated, in writing, to another employee at the discretion of the delegating individual.

Nothing in this Manual shall be deemed to create a vested contractual right for any employee.

Amendments and revisions shall become effective upon adoption by the City Council, or at a later date specified by the City Council when adopting the amendments and revisions. If the terms and provisions of this Manual are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms and provisions of any prior City Personnel Policies and Procedures, resolutions, regulations, and/or policies governing the same subject, the terms of this Manual will prevail and such inconsistent or conflicting provisions or prior rules, resolutions, regulations, and/or policies are hereby repealed.

The City Manager is authorized to issue written guidelines to implement and enforce this Manual, and to make adjustments to avoid or eliminate inequities resulting from its application. Such guidelines shall have the City’s best interests as their paramount concern, and shall be consistent with applicable state and federal guidelines. The City Manager may delegate any of the powers and duties conferred upon the City Manager as the Personnel Officer to any other officer or employee of the City or may recommend that such powers and duties shall be performed under contract.

In the event of a conflict between this Manual and an Administrative Policy or a Department’s policy or procedure, this Manual shall control.

When any local, state, or federal ordinance, regulation, or law that is incorporated in this Manual or upon which this Manual relies is amended, this Manual shall be deemed amended in conformance with those amendments.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Manual is found to be illegal by a court of competent jurisdiction, such findings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Manual.
3232
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 2

ORGANIZATION
The City was incorporated as a City on October 1, 2010. The City is governed by a City Council, consisting of five (5) persons, each elected for a term of four (4) years. The City Council generally meets twice a month, on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month, unless otherwise directed by the City Council.

The City Council adopts policies and specifies what City services are to be provided to City residents. Some of the services that the City provides includes public safety services (Police [through contract with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department] and Fire [through contract with CalFire]), Building and Safety Services, Animal Control (through contract with Riverside County), Planning and Public Works.

The City Council’s policies are implemented by the City Manager, who is directly responsible to the City Council for the administration and implementation of the Council policies and priorities.

To assist the City Manager, the City employs a staff of administrative, technical and field personnel. The City further utilizes contractors to provide a number of City services. Contractors are not City employees.

The City’s activities and services are divided into functional departments, with Department Heads assigned to each department.
3233
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 3

DEFINITIONS
General Definition: All words and terms used in this Manual and in any personnel policies or procedures are intended to be defined as they are normally and generally defined in the field of personnel administration, unless a specific definition is provided in this Manual.

Specific Definitions:

Acting Appointment: An interim appointment of a current City employee by the City Manager to temporarily perform the full duties of a position with a higher maximum base rate of pay.

City: The City of Eastvale.

City Council: The City Council of the City of Eastvale.

Class/Class of position/Classification: All positions sufficiently similar in duties, authority, qualifications, and responsibility, to permit grouping under a common title in the application with equity of common standards of selection, transfer, demotion, and salary.

Compensation: The salary, wage, allowance, and all other forms of valuable consideration earned by or paid to any employee by reason of service in any position, but does not include expenses authorized and incurred incidental to employment.

Classified Service: means the offices, positions and employments in the service of the City which are included or which may hereafter be included under the classified service system by ordinance, except the following: 1) Elected officers; 2) Members of appointed boards, commissions and committees; 3) Persons engaged under contract to supply expert, professional, or technical services for a definite period of time; 4) Volunteer personnel; 5) City Manager; 6) City Attorney; 7) Department heads; 8) Management classifications listed in appendix A to this Manual; and employees hired on or after July 1, 2026, in the management classifications listed in appendix B; and 9) Employees serving in hourly, temporary, provisional, or seasonal appointments.

City Manager: The City Manager of the City of Eastvale or designee.

Days: Calendar days unless stated otherwise in these Rules.

Domestic Partner/Registered Domestic Partner: Means a member of a registered domestic partnership under California law.

Eligibility List: A list that contains the names of successful applicants according to their relative performance in the examination process and other terms set forth in this Manual. The applicants may be ranked in descending final ratings based on average scores through the interview process.

Eligibles: Persons who have taken an open-competitive examination or promotional examination and have qualified for placement on an eligibility list. 3234
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 4
Full-Time Employees: Employees who hold budgeted positions that normally require a 40-hour work week or that have been approved by the City Council to be a fulltime position.

Furlough: Temporary, involuntary, non-disciplinary employee absence from duty that may be implemented by the City in addition to, or as an alternative to, layoff or other cost saving measures. Furlough time does not constitute a break in service for purposes of these Rules.

Human Resources and Risk Management Director: The Human Resources and Risk Management Director or designee, as may be designated by the City Manager.

Job Description: A written description of a class, identifying factors and conditions which are essential characteristics of the class, including the title, examples of duties and responsibilities which are typical of positions in the class, any factors or conditions which distinguish it from other classes, and necessary or desirable qualifications to perform the duties of positions in the class.

Lay-Off: The separation of employees from the active work force due to lack of work or funds, or organizational changes, or to the abolition of positions by the City Council for any of those reasons.

Personnel Officer: The City Manager is the Personnel Officer for all City employees, except for all positions for which appointing authority is reserved by the City Council or as otherwise provided in the Municipal Code. The City Manager may delegate their appointing authority to a Department Head Position: A group of duties and responsibilities assigned to an employee.

Probationary Period: An integral part of the selection process during which an employee is required to demonstrate fitness for his/her position based on actual performance of the duties of the position.

Reclassification: The reassignment of one position in a class to a different class by the City Manager in accordance with this Manual.

Reemployment List: A list of names of laid off employees, who may have reinstatement rights, for a specific classification or position.

Regular Full Time or Regular Part Time Employee: An employee in the classified service who has successfully completed the probationary period and has been retained in accordance with this Manual.

Resignation: The voluntary separation of a City employee from the City service. A written resignation is accepted upon receipt by the City and may not be withdrawn except by authorization of the City Manager when it is deemed that the City’s best interests are served by permitting resignation withdrawal.
3235
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
4914-0678-2125 v4 5
Salary Rate/Base Salary Rate: The dollar amount paid to an employee in accordance with the salary range for the employee’s class, exclusive of any overtime compensation, stipends, premium pay, or other wage augments.

Temporary Employee: A person who is employed by the City for a limited period of time for a specified, limited purpose. Temporary Employees may not work more than 1,000 hours per fiscal year, and full-time Temporary Employees may not work for longer than 6 continuous months. Temporary Employees are eligible for only those benefits required by applicable State and Federal laws. Temporary Employees are at-will employees and may be separated from employment at any time with or without cause. Temporary Employees are not subject to the terms and conditions of the following sections of this Manual: 1) Section 1.6 Recruitment; 2) Section 1.9 Probation; 3) Section 1.18 Telecommuting; 4) Section 2.6 Bi-lingual Pay; 5) Section 2.7 Temporary Assignments; 6) Section 2.8 Call Back Pay; 7) Section 2.9 On Call (Standby) Pay; 8) Section 2.10 Car Allowance; 9) Section 2.11 Phone Allowance; 10) Section 3.1 Holidays; 11) Section 3.4 Retirement; 12) Section 4.2 Vacation;13) Section 4.13 Personal Leave of Absence without Pay; 14) Section

4.14 Jury Duty; 15) Section 4.16 Bereavement Leave; and 16) Chapter 5. 3236
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
6 CHAPTER 1 - EMPLOYMENT
SECTION 1.1 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
The City is an equal opportunity employer and makes employment decisions on the basis of merit.

The City wants to have the best available persons in every job. The City’s policy prohibits unlawful discrimination based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age over 40, physical or mental disability, medical condition, pregnancy (including childbirth and related medical conditions or disabilities), sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, gender expression, genetic characteristics or information, military or veteran’s status, reproductive health decision making, a combination of those characteristics, and/or any other characteristic protected by federal and/or state law. It also prohibits unlawful discrimination based on the perception that anyone has any of those characteristics or a combination of those characteristics, or is associated with a person who has or is perceived as having any of those characteristics or a combination of those characteristics, and any other basis protected by federal, state or local law or ordinance or regulation. The City is committed to treating all employees equally and fairly regardless of these actual or perceived characteristics or associations. All such discrimination is prohibited. This policy applies to all City employees, applicants, interns, volunteers and persons providing services pursuant to a contract.

SECTION 1.2 POLICY PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION The City’s policy prohibits unlawful harassment and discrimination based upon an applicant or employee’s race, genetic information, religion, creed, color, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, national origin, ancestry, military or veteran status, marital status, pregnancy, reproductive health decision-making, childbirth, breastfeeding, or a related medical condition, age over 40, medical condition, physical or mental disability, or a combination of those characteristics, or any other characteristic protected under state, federal, or local law.

The City also prohibits unlawful harassment and discrimination based on the perception that anyone has any of those characteristics or a combination of those characteristics, or is associated with a person who has or is perceived as having any of those characteristics or a combination of those characteristics. In addition, the City prohibits retaliation because of the applicant or employee’s opposition to a practice he/she reasonably believes to constitute employment discrimination or harassment or because of his/her employee’s participation in an employment investigation, proceeding or hearing.

Applicants or employees who believe they have been harassed, discriminated against, or retaliated against, should report that conduct in accordance with the City’s complaint procedures.

Applicants and employees should review the City’s complete Policy Prohibiting Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation Policy.

SECTION 1.3 DISABLED APPLICANTS AND EMPLOYEES
The City has a commitment to ensure equal opportunities for disabled applicants and City employees. Every reasonable effort will be made to provide an accessible work environment for such employees and applicants. Employment practices (e.g., hiring, training, testing, transfer, promotion, compensation, benefits, and disciplinary action) will not discriminate against disabled employees or applicants. The City provides employment-related reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities within the meaning of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). 3237
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
7 1.3.1 Request for Accommodation
An applicant or employee who desires a reasonable accommodation to perform essential job functions should make such a request in writing to Human Resources and Risk Management.

The request must identify: a) the job-related functions at issue; and b) the desired accommodation(s). Reasonable accommodation can include, but is not limited to job restructuring, reassignment to a vacant position for which the employee is qualified, and making facilities accessible. In accordance with applicable law, the City may permit use of accrued leave or authorize a temporary unpaid leave as a reasonable accommodation, if such leave is reasonably expected to result in the employee’s return to work, with or without additional reasonable accommodation.

1.3.2 Reasonable Documentation of Disability
Following receipt of the request, Human Resources and Risk Management may require additional information, such as reasonable documentation of the existence of a disability or additional explanation as to the effect of the disability on the employee’s ability to perform the employee’s essential functions, but will not require disclosure of diagnosis or genetic history.

1.3.3 Interactive Process
The City will engage in the interactive process, as defined by the FEHA and ADA, to determine whether an applicant or employee is able to perform the essential functions of the position sought or currently held. During this process, the City will examine potential reasonable accommodations that will make it possible for the employee or applicant to so perform. Such interactive process will include a meeting with the employee or applicant, the City, their representatives (if any), and, if necessary, the employee or applicant’s health care provider.

1.3.4 Case-by-Case Determination
The City determines, in its sole discretion, whether reasonable accommodations(s) can be made, and the type of reasonable accommodations(s) to provide. The City will not provide an accommodation that would pose an undue hardship upon the City or that is not required by law.

The City will inform the employee of any decisions made under this section in writing.

1.3.5 Fitness for Duty Leave
While the City is engaged in the interactive process with an employee, the City may require that the employee be placed on a fitness for duty leave in accordance with Section 4.18.

SECTION 1.4 ACCOMMODATION FOR SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEF The City will make reasonable accommodations to the known sincerely held religious beliefs of a person during the hiring process and in the course of employment, if the accommodation would resolve a conflict between the person’s religious beliefs, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the City. The following procedure shall apply:

1.4.1 Procedure for Requesting a Religious Accommodation.

If a person believes that a religious accommodation is necessary, the person should submit a request for accommodation to Human Resources and Risk Management. This request may be 3238
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
8 made orally or in writing, however the City encourages written requests. Such requests should include the following relevant information:
a. A description of the accommodation requested;
b. The reason the accommodation is necessary; and
c. A description as to how the accommodation will resolve the conflict between the person’s religious beliefs or practices and the City’s application or employment requirements for the corresponding position.

Upon receiving the request, the City will invite the person to a meeting to explore potential accommodations that could resolve the conflict between the person’s religious beliefs and the City’s application or employment requirements for the corresponding position. The City may provide the person’s requested accommodation or may provide an alternative reasonable accommodation based on the City’s discretion, to the extent that an effective accommodation is available without imposing undue hardship on the City.

SECTION 1.5 LACTATION ACCOMMODATION
a. In accordance with applicable state and federal law, an employee who needs to express breast milk for the employee’s infant child will be permitted to take a reasonable amount of break time for that purpose, as a lactation accommodation. The break time must, if possible, run concurrently with any break time already provided to the employee. For non-exempt employees, break time that takes place outside of authorized paid rest time is unpaid. To the extent that break time would seriously disrupt the City’s operations, the City may limit the employee’s use of such time.
b. An employee seeking lactation accommodation must contact Human Resources and Risk Management by email, or via other written communication. The City will respond via email or other written document within a reasonable period of time to acknowledge the request.

Before implementing a lactation accommodation, the City will request input from the employee and the employee’s supervisor(s) regarding the anticipated timing of lactation break(s) and proposed location(s) for taking lactation breaks.
c. Following such a request, the City will provide written details to the employee regarding the terms of the lactation accommodation, which will include:
(i) Identification of a space, other than a bathroom, that is in close proximity to the employee’s work area, is safe, clean, free of hazardous materials, and that is shielded from view and free from intrusion while the employee is expressing milk. (A) The City will also ensure that the space contains a place to sit and a surface to place a breast pump and personal items and contains access to electricity or alternative devices (such as extension cords or charging stations) needed to operate an electric or battery-powered breast pump.
(B) If the designated space is a room that may also be used for purposes other than lactation, the City will ensure that the use of the room for expression of milk will take priority over other uses.
3239
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
9 (ii) Identification of a sink with running water and a refrigerator (or other cooling device suitable for storing expressed milk) that are in close proximity to the employee’s work area and that will be accessible for the employee’s use.

SECTION 1.6 RECRUITMENT/SELECTION OF EMPLOYEES
All persons considered for employment with the City shall be qualified to perform the duties of the position for which they may be employed. No individual who has served as an elected or appointed member of a legislative body of the City will be considered for employment with the City unless that individual is no longer serving as an elected or appointed official of the City and a period of one year has passed since their service as an elected or appointed official terminated.

As set forth in greater detail below, all new employees may, depending upon the job applied for, be required to undergo fingerprinting, background check, medical and/or psychological exams, polygraphs, and pre-employment drug testing before reporting for work. All employees shall be required to sign an Oath of Office pursuant to State law.

All new employees must provide and maintain necessary documentation to prove identity and the right to work in the United States in accordance with Federal and State Immigration and Naturalization laws (per I-9 Form). Failure to provide such documentation will result in disqualification from selection and/or grounds for immediate termination.

These steps establish a procedure for all phases of the employment process for regular full time and regular part- time employees. The City Manager, or designee, will administer and coordinate the hiring process for all position vacancies to ensure compliance with contractual, legal and equal employment opportunity requirements. All such hiring efforts are conducted in the spirit of equal opportunity and non- discrimination.

All regular full-time and regular part-time City appointments and promotions shall be based on merit and fitness and will be determined by the results of any or all of the following testing procedures: written test, practical skills examination, and/or oral interview.

1.6.1 Internal Recruitment
The City Manager, or designee, may first consider recruitment from within the City. Recruiting from within the City is considered an internal recruitment and must be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the City Manager.

It is the policy of the City to recruit from within the City organization whenever feasible and consistent with the City’s interests of developing and retaining talent. Electronic job-flyers will be prepared and disseminated to employees informing them of current openings, and qualified employees are encouraged to apply.

Full-time and part-time employees interested in internal opportunities shall follow the procedures below:
a. Employee(s) may submit a completed City Employment Application to Human Resources and Risk Management, by the position’s stated closing date. A supplemental questionnaire may also be required, as noted on the electronic job flyer. 3240
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
10 b. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director will notify the employee(s) if he/she will be interviewed or tested for the position. c. After successfully completing the selection process, and upon the City Manager’s approval, the selected employee(s) will be notified of their appointment to the position(s).

1.6.2 Open Recruitment
a. If an internal recruitment is not recommended or approved, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director, will seek candidates through a recruitment open to internal and external candidates.

The Human Resources and Risk Management Director will determine the best method for seeking candidates through open recruitment, including, but not limited to any of the following procedures:
job announcements in print and online, mailing lists and/or advertisements through professional associations and related outreach.

1.6.3 Examination Process
Examinations shall be conducted to assist with the selection of qualified candidates. Test selection techniques will examine the qualifications of the candidates. Tests may include, but are not limited to, written tests, personal interviews, performance tests, physical agility tests, evaluation of daily work performance, work samples, or any combination of these. All examinations given will be job related and designed to determine a candidate’s knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform the essential job functions.

Pre- employment physical, medical, psychological, drug and alcohol tests may be given as part of any examination if required for performing the essential job functions. Any such examinations will be performed only after a conditional offer of employment has been made.

The City Manager, or designee, will ensure that all examination results remain confidential and that reasonable accommodations are made in examinations for persons with disabilities under the ADA and/or FEHA, when needed.

1.6.4 Interview Process
The employment interview is a significant part of the selection process. The interviewer’s function is to discover a candidate’s knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform the essential job functions.

Certain guidelines must be observed to ensure compliance with State and Federal laws and to maximize the reliability of the interview process.

Interview questions must be job-related and designed to measure a candidate’s job knowledge, experience and education necessary to perform the essential job functions.

All interview panel members, if utilized by the City Manager, will be informed of the position responsibilities and requirements and each panel member must independently rate candidates using an objective measurement scale developed by the City.

Only the most highly rated candidate (s) will be considered for final evaluation and review. 3241
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
11 1.6.5 Reference Check
Before an offer of employment is extended, the City shall conduct a reference check on any candidate. The purpose of the reference check is to verify prior employment duties, dates of employment, performance record, attendance record, and any other pertinent information.

1.6.6 Criminal Conviction History
Except as otherwise required by law, the City will only inquire about criminal conviction history after it has issued a conditional offer of employment. Applicants who receive a conditional offer of employment may be requested to be fingerprinted and/or undergo a background screening, as part of the examination process. Refusal of an applicant or employee to be fingerprinted, failure to report for fingerprinting or failure to provide such information as is necessary to conduct a background check will be sufficient cause for disqualification for employment or termination from employment.

1.6.7 Rejection
The City may reject an applicant, at any point in the recruitment or hiring process, under any of the following circumstances:
a. The applicant does not possess the minimum qualifications required for the position;
b. The applicant failed to submit a complete application; c. The applicant has made any false statement, misrepresentation, or omission of any material fact, or who had practiced, or attempted to practice, any deception or fraud in the person’s application;
d. The applicant has not signed the application under penalty of perjury; e. The applicant did not submit the application in a timely manner; f. The applicant has otherwise violated provisions of these Rules; or g. The applicant has demonstrated other reasons which would indicate that the applicant is unfit for the position.

Applicants disqualified from further participation in the selection process will be promptly notified to permit submission of additional information provided that the time limit for receiving applications has not expired. Notice will be e-mailed to the last known e-mail address; it will be the applicant’s responsibility to keep the applicant’s current e-mail address on file. Whenever an application is rejected, Human Resources and Risk Management will e-mail notice of such rejection to the applicant.

In addition, applicants with the least desirable background or qualifications among a large number of applicants may be denied further participation in the selection process through an evaluation of their qualifications, thus providing a reasonable number of the best qualified candidates for consideration.
3242
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
12 1.6.8 Candidate Notification
After references are verified and a decision to provide a conditional job offer is made, the City will notify the selected candidate, in writing, and make an employment offer, contingent upon passing required health screening as defined in Section 1.7 below and successful completion of a criminal history check as provided in Section 1.6.5 above, as may be applicable. Once the candidate successfully completes the medical examination and criminal history check, as may be applicable, all other candidates, if any, will be notified in writing that they were not selected for the position and that they will remain on the eligibility list for a one year period.

SECTION 1.7 MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS
Following a conditional offer of employment, prospective employees may be required to complete a job related pre-employment medical examination. The City may require that employees take a psychological and/or a medical examination, as it deems necessary in order to determine employees to be mentally and physically capable of performing the essential functions of the job.

Conditional offers of employment are made contingent upon passing this medical examination, however, the City will make reasonable accommodations to the special needs of any disabled individual as required by law. A licensed health care provider chosen by the City will perform such examination without cost to the prospective employee. The prospective employee will be required to complete a medical history questionnaire and a medical records release as necessary to facilitate the examination. The health care provider will indicate the employee’s fitness for employment on the examination form. Depending on the essential functions of a position, a medical examination may be required for:
a. Applicants who have received a conditional offer of employment; b. Employees seeking a transfer from one position requiring general physical abilities to another position requiring physical abilities of a different nature; c. Employees returning to work from a medical leave of absence. The physician conducting the medical examination will be supplied with a current job description indicating the essential functions of the position; or
d. When a supervisor observes or receives a reliable report of an employee’s possible lack of fitness for duty. Observations and reports may be based on, but are not limited to, employee’s own self-report of potential unfitness, dexterity, coordination, alertness, speech, vision acuity, concentration, response to criticism, interactions with the public, co-workers, and supervisors.

1.7.2 Confidentiality.

The results of all medical examinations will be kept confidential. Examination results for newly hired employees and employees transferring to another position will be kept in the employee’s confidential medical file. No employee will hold any position in which the employee is not able to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without reasonable accommodation. 3243
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
13 1.7.3 Regulatory Compliance.

Certain employees are subject to regulations issued by the Department of Transportation and/or the California Department of Motor Vehicles. All such employees must meet the standards set forth in those regulations as part of the hiring process and as part of continued employment.

SECTION 1.8 NEPOTISM AND CONSENSUAL ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS

1.8.1 Nepotism
a. Definitions:
(i) Applicant. A person who applies for a position at the City and is not a Current Employee.
(ii) Change of Status. A change in the legal status or personnel status of one or more Current Employees.
(A) Changes in legal status include but are not limited to marriage, divorce, separation, or any such change through which a Current Employee becomes a Family Member or ceases to be a Family Member of another Current Employee. (B) Changes in personnel status include but are not limited to promotion, demotion, transfer, resignation, retirement or termination of a Current Employee who is a Family Member of another Current Employee.
(iii) Current Employee. A person who is presently a City employee, or an elected or appointed City official.
(iv) Direct Supervision. One or more of the following roles, undertaken on a regular, acting, overtime, or other basis shall constitute Direct Supervision:
(A) Occupying a position in an employee’s line of supervision; or (B) Functional supervision, such as a lead worker, crew leader, or shift supervisor; or
(C) Participating in personnel actions including, but not limited to, appointment, transfer, promotion, demotion, layoff, suspension, termination, assignments, approval of merit increases, evaluations, and grievance adjustments. (v) Family Member. A spouse, domestic partner, parent, parent-in-law, stepparent, legal guardian, sister, step-sister, sister-in-law, brother, step-brother, brother-in-law, child, step-child, legal ward, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, grandchild, or grandparent. (vi) Prohibited Conduct. Conduct by Family Members including, but not limited to, one or more of the following:
(A) Participation directly or indirectly in the recruitment or selection process for a position for which a Family Member is an Applicant. 3244
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
14 (B) Direct Supervision of a Family Member that does not comply with limitations set forth in this policy;
(C) Conduct by one or more Family Members that has an adverse effect on supervision, safety, security or morale.
b. Applicants for Employment.
(i) Right to Apply. No qualified Applicant may be denied the right to file an application for employment and compete in the examination process. However, consistent with this policy, the City may reasonably regulate, condition, or prohibit the employment of an Applicant. (ii) Disclosure of Relationship. Each Applicant is required to disclose the identity of any Family Member who is a Current Employee. (iii) Review of Human Resources and Risk Management Director. For each Applicant who has a Family Member who is a Current Employee, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall assess whether any of the following circumstances exist:
(A) Business reasons of supervision, safety, security or morale warrant the City’s refusal to place the Applicant under Direct Supervision by the Family Member; or (B) Business reasons of supervision, security, or morale that involve potential conflicts of interest or other hazards that are greater for Family Members than for other employees, which warrant the City’s refusal to permit employment of Family Members in the same department, division, or facility.
(iv) Decision of the Human Resources and Risk Management Director. If the Human Resources and Risk Management Director determines that either of the above circumstances exist, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall exercise his or her discretion to either reject the Applicant or consider the Applicant for employment in a position that does not present either of the above circumstances. (A) Following examination, if the Applicant is successfully certified as eligible pursuant to Section 1.6.7, he or she may be employed in a position for which the Human Resources and Risk Management Director has determined that neither circumstance exists pursuant to Section 1.8.1.b.iii above.
(B) When an eligible Applicant is refused appointment by virtue of this section, his or her name shall remain on any employment list that has been created for openings in the same classification. For each opening, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall make a determination consistent with Section 1.8.1.b.iii above. c. Guidelines for Current Employees.
(i) Employees shall report a Change of Status to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director within a reasonable time after the effective date of the Change of Status. Wherever feasible, Employees shall report a Change of Status in advance of the effective date.
3245
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
15 (ii) Within thirty days from receipt of notice, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall undertake a case-by-case consideration and individualized assessment of the particular work situation to determine whether the Change of Status has the potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale. (A) The Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall consult with the affected Department Head to make a good faith effort to regulate, transfer, condition or assign duties in such a way as to minimize potential problems of supervision, safety, security, or morale.
(B) Notwithstanding the above provisions, the City retains the right to exercise its discretion to determine that the potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale cannot be sufficiently minimized and to take further action as set forth in Section 1.8.1.d.ii below.
d. Monitoring by Department Head.
(i) Following a Change of Status or new hire of a Family Member, affected Department Heads shall reasonably monitor and regulate both Family Members’ conduct and performance for a period of one year from the date of the Human Resources and Risk Management Director’s determination. The Department Head shall document these actions.

Successive Department Heads may re-visit such a determination at their discretion. (ii) If the Department Head determines, subject to any applicable requirements of due process, that an employee has engaged in Prohibited Conduct, the Department Head shall re-visit the Human Resources and Risk Management Director’s determination. Depending on the severity of the Prohibited Conduct, the Department Head may recommend that the Human Resources and Risk Management Director take one or more of the following additional measures:
(A) Transfer one of the Family Members to a similar position that would not be in violation of this policy. The transfer will be granted provided the Family Member qualifies and there is an opening to be filled. There can be no guarantee that the new position will be within the same classification or at the same salary level. (B) If the situation cannot be resolved by transfer, one of the Family Members must separate from City employment. If one of the employees does not voluntarily resign, the employee with primary responsibility for the Prohibited Conduct will be discharged. (iii) Department Heads who receive complaints from other employees that one or more Family Members has engaged in Prohibited Conduct shall respond in accordance with existing complaint and disciplinary procedures, where applicable. (iv) Where situations exist prior to the effective date of this policy that may be in conflict with this policy , every effort shall be made to reasonably address the situation so as to avoid any future conflict.
e. Appeal of Human Resources and Risk Management Director Determination.

Current Employees and Applicants affected by the application of this policy, may appeal the action to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director within ten days of the action. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall hear the individual’s concerns and issue a written decision within 30 days of receipt of the individual’s appeal. An individual who is dissatisfied with 3246
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
16 the Human Resources and Risk Management Director’s decision may appeal to the City Manager within five days of receipt of the Human Resources and Risk Management Director’s decision.

The City Manager shall hear the individual’s concerns and issue a written decision within 30 days of the receipt of the individual’s appeal. The decision of the City Manager is final, and no other appeal may be had unless the employee is entitled to further administrative appeal under other provisions of this Manual.
f. Employee Complaints. Employees who believe that they have been adversely affected by Prohibited Conduct by one or more Family Member should submit complaints to a Department Head or to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director. g. Savings Clause. Should any provision of this policy, or any application thereof, be unlawful by virtue of any federal, state, or local laws and regulations, or by court decision, such provision shall be effective and implemented only to the extent permitted by such law, regulation or court decision, but in all other aspects, the provisions of this Article shall continue in full force and effect.

1.8.2 Consensual Romantic Relationships Between Employees a. General. Consensual romantic or sexual relationships between City employees can lead to misunderstandings, complaints of favoritism, adverse effects on employee morale, and possible claims of sexual harassment during or after termination of the relationship. As a result, such relationships present existing or potential conflicts that adversely affect efficient operation of the City. Relationships that present an actual conflict under this Section are therefore prohibited.
b. Application. This section shall apply to all City employees, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, who have a romantic or sexual relationship with another City employee. The provisions of Section 1.8.1 regarding nepotism shall govern employees who marry or become domestic partners with another City employee.
c. Definition of Conflict. For purposes of this section, a conflict exists if business issues of supervision, safety, security, and/or morale would be impacted by a romantic or sexual relationship between two employees.
d. Supervisor’s Duty to Report. If a romantic or sexual relationship exists between a Supervisor and another employee (including another Supervisor), the Supervisor shall promptly disclose the relationship to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director and request a determination as to whether the relationship presents a conflict. The disclosure must identify the names and positions of both employees. A Supervisor’s failure to comply with this section shall be grounds for discipline up to and including termination. e. Determination by Human Resources and Risk Management Director. Within five working days, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director shall issue a written determination as to whether the relationship presents a conflict, and is thereby prohibited. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director, in consultation with the City Manager, shall have exclusive discretion in making the determination.
f. Resolution of Conflicts. Subject to limitations imposed by the Municipal Code and applicable provisions of this Manual, the City Manager or designee will attempt in good faith to work with the Supervisor and the other employee to consider options to eliminate the conflict, 3247
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
17 including removing the Supervisory authority that created the conflict, reassignment, transfer or voluntary demotion of a Supervisory employee, or where the City Manager or designee determines that modification of a Supervisor’s assignment is not feasible, reassignment, transfer or voluntary demotion of a non-Supervisory employee. The City Manager or designee retains discretion to determine that the conflict may be resolved via voluntary resignation or termination only.
g. Prohibited On-Duty Conduct. All City employees are prohibited from engaging in intimate, physical, or other conduct in furtherance of a romantic or sexual relationship with another City employee at City facilities or assigned work locations, including off-site meetings, conferences, and similar activities. Such conduct is further prohibited during work hours.

Moreover, upon termination of a sexual or romantic relationship with another City employee, employees are prohibited from engaging in behavior that adversely affects the working conditions of any City employee. In general, all employees are expected to observe appropriate standards of workplace conduct in their interactions with other City employees. h. Complaints. Employees who believe that they have been adversely affected by romantic or sexual relationships between City employees should follow the complaint procedures provided under the City’s Policy Against Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation. The complaint procedures are available to all employees regardless of their past or present participation in a romantic or sexual relationship with another City employee.

SECTION 1.9 PROBATION
The probationary period is an integral part of the employment process and provides the opportunity to observe the employee’s work and assist the employee’s adjustment to the new position. This section only applies to regular full-time and regular part-time classifications. This section does not apply to at-will management employees.

1.9.1 Duration
All regular employees shall serve probationary periods, and all newly hired employees will serve a minimum one-year probationary period. Employees promoted into a higher-level position shall serve a six-month promotional probationary period. Probationary periods may be extended in accordance with this Manual and as permissible by law.

1.9.2 Rejection of Probationer
When initially hired into a full-time position, every person hired by the City shall be considered probationary until either granted regular status by the City Manager, upon recommendation of the Department Head, or by default at the conclusion of one year. Probationary employees do not have property or vested rights to their position with the City and are considered at-will employees.

During the probationary period, an employee may be rejected at any time by the City Manager without cause and without the right of appeal. Notification of rejection in writing shall be served on the probationer and a copy shall be filed with the Human Resources and Risk Management Office.

1.9.3 Extensions
a. Prior to the end of any probation period, the probation period may be extended by a maximum of twelve (12) additional months with the approval of the City Manager, or designee. 3248
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
18 b. Periods of time off work during unpaid absences will automatically extend the probationary period by the number of days of the absence. Further, periods of time on paid leave exceeding 20 consecutive working days will extend the probationary period by a corresponding number of days.
c. The employee will be notified in writing of such an extension.

1.9.4 Rejection from Promotional Probation or Employee Initiated Transfer Any employee rejected during the probationary period following a promotional appointment shall be reinstated to the position from which the employee was promoted if it remains vacant, unless:
a. Charges are filed and the employee is discharged in the manner provided in these rules for positions in the classified service;
b. No vacancy exists for the classification to which the employee would revert; or c. No funding is available in the classification to which the employee would revert.

If there is no vacancy in the employee’s prior position or a similar position or if no such position is funded, the employee may request to be placed on a reemployment list.

1.9.5 Probationary Period Following Demotion, Transfer, Reinstatement or Reemployment a. Demotion. A new 12-month probationary period will be required following demotion, unless waived by the City Manager. When an employee demotes from one department to another department, a new probationary period will be served in the new department. b. Transfer. A new 12-month probationary period will be required following transfer, unless waived by the City Manager. When an employee transfers from one department to another department, a new probationary period will be served in the new department. c. Reinstatement. A new 12-month probationary period will be required upon reinstatement to a position, unless specifically waived in writing by the City Manager d. Reemployment. Persons appointed to positions by reemployment must serve a new 6-month probationary period, unless the appointment is to the same class in the same department where the person previously successfully completed a probationary period.

SECTION 1.10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
The purpose of the performance evaluation is to accurately assess the employee’s overall job performance, and to set goals with the employee that further job knowledge and enhance skills and abilities. Performance Improvement Plans may be implemented based on the Department Head’s sole discretion, are not disciplinary in nature, and aim to assist employees better perform their job duties.

1.10.1 Performance Evaluation
All regular full-time employees, regular part-time employees, and part-time employees will receive a comprehensive performance evaluation from their immediate supervisor annually. The 3249
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
19 evaluation period may be extended if the employee takes time off work as follows: 1) unpaid absences will automatically extend the evaluation period by the number of days of the absence; and 2) paid leave exceeding twenty (20) consecutive working days will extend the evaluation period by a corresponding number of days. The employee will be notified in writing of such an extension.

Newly hired City employees, who are subject to a probationary period, may receive an optional performance evaluation during the probationary period, generally six (6) months after the hire date at the City Manager’s sole discretion. In the event more than one (1) person supervises an employee, all supervisors are required to participate in the performance evaluation process.

Except for the optional performance evaluation during the probationary period, employees may be eligible for a merit increase in conjunction with their annual performance review.

At-will management positions may receive an optional performance evaluation at the City Manager’s discretion.

Performance evaluations will be prepared on a City performance evaluation form, discussed with the employee, and placed in the employee’s personnel file where it can be examined by the employee at reasonable times upon request. An employee may receive additional performance appraisals from time to time whenever it is considered appropriate by the employee’s supervisor(s). Employees will be required to submit their self-evaluation, accomplishments and goals to their supervisor, prior to the preparation of the performance evaluation.

An employee may file a written response to a performance evaluation, regardless of the overall rating, within thirty (30) working days, which will be placed with the evaluation in the employee’s personnel file. The written response shall be prepared by the employee on their own time. City time and resources may not be used to prepare the written response. There is no requirement for management to respond in writing to the employee’s written response. Performance evaluations provided under this section are not subject to appeal or grievance.

1.10.2 Performance Improvement Plans
An employee’s Department Head, or designee, may place an employee on a Performance Improvement Plan (“PIP”) to correct an employee’s failure to meet departmental performance expectations on a consistent basis. The PIP is designed to clarify performance expectation for employees. It is a supplement to, not a replacement for, an employee’s job description detailing the employee’s job duties. A PIP will provide employees, among other things, with the following:
1) specific areas for improvement; 2) recommendations regarding strategies to improve the employee’s job performance; 3) periodic evaluation of the employee’s adherence to the PIP; and 4) timeline indicating the PIP’s duration. At the conclusion of a PIP period, one of the following will occur: 1) the PIP will be concluded because the employee has successfully met the expectations; 2) the PIP will be extended; or 3) disciplinary action will be taken.

SECTION 1.11 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT, ACTIVITY, OR ENTERPRISE / CONFLICT OF

INTEREST
As a public agency, the City must be particularly sensitive to real, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest. The City expects all employees to adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards. City employees are employed on the condition that employment with the City is their primary employment and that they shall not engage in any employment, activity or enterprise for compensation which is inconsistent, incompatible or in conflict with his/her duties, functions or 3250
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
20 responsibilities as a City employee. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for City employees regarding dual employment or outside activities that may conflict with City employment.

No City employee shall use his/her name as an employee of the City to seek benefit from any commercial or business enterprise. No employee shall approve or utilize the name, uniform or prestige of the City, or any City department, for any such purpose. Because of their knowledge and expertise, outside employment or other income opportunities may become available to City employees. If an employee is considering such an opportunity, he or she must fully disclose the employment opportunity to the City and to have it carefully reviewed to avoid conflict of interest.

Failure to disclose outside employment or potential business opportunities that may create a conflict of interest is grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination.

Employees shall notify the City Manager in writing if they are considering the following:
a. Simultaneous employment by any other employer;
b. Participation in an outside business on their own or with others; or c. Involvement in any other outside activity where they receive any form or amount of compensation.

The City Manager or designee shall determine if a conflict exists. If a conflict of interest or scheduling problem exists, the City may terminate the employee’s City employment unless the employee elects to resign from the other employment or outside activity.

An employee’s outside employment, activity or enterprise may be prohibited if it:
a. Involves the use of City time, facilities, equipment and supplies, the badge, uniform prestige or influence of his/her City department or employment for private gain or advantage. b. Involves receipt or acceptance by the employee of any money or other consideration from anyone other than the City for the performance of an act which the employee would be required or expected to render in the regular course or hours of his/her City employment or as a part of his/her duties as a City employee.
c. Involves the performance of an act in other than his/her capacity as a City employee which may later be subject directly or indirectly to the control, inspection, review or audit, or enforcement of any other employee to the department by which he/she is employed. d. Involves such time demands as would render performance of his/her duties as a City employee less efficient.

Procedure for obtaining approval:
a. The employee shall request authorization of outside employment from the employee’s Department Head, or designee by completing the Authorization for Outside Employment Form prior to entering into the requested outside employment. b. The employee’s Department Head, or designee shall authorize outside employment in accordance with this policy. In the event a request for outside employment is denied, written comments will be provided to the employee. 3251
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
21 c. The employee’s Department Head, or designee shall furnish the requesting employee a copy of the Authorization for Outside Employment indicating approval/denial and forward a copy to the employee’s personnel file.
d. The employee may appeal the decision determining that the outside employment or activity is prohibited to the City Manager by submitting a written appeal to the City Manager within ten days of such determination. Failure of the employee to submit a timely written appeal shall waive the employee’s right to such appeal. The written appeal shall include reasons that the employee believes the determination that the outside employment/activity is not prohibited under this policy.
e. Within ten days of receiving the employee’s written appeal, the City Manager shall issue a decision either affirming or reversing the determination regarding the employee’s outside employment/activity. The City Manager’s decision shall be final and binding and not subject to any further appeal. An employee who continues outside employment/activity after a determination that such outside employment/activity is prohibited is subject to disciplinary action, including and up to termination of employment.

Every public employee who makes or influences governmental decisions is required to submit a Statement of Economic Interest, also known as the Form 700. The Form 700 provides transparency and ensures accountability. It provides necessary information to the public about an employee’s personal financial interests to ensure that officials are making decisions in the best interest of the public and not enhancing their personal finances, and it serves as a reminder to the employee of potential conflicts of interest so the official can abstain from making or participating in governmental decisions that are deemed conflicts of interest. The City shall determine positions which fall under the above requirements and notify employees accordingly for submittal of initial and annual statements.

SECTION 1.12 TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES

1.12.1 Policy
a. Subject to Department Head approval, City employees are eligible to request specialized training such as conferences, seminars, special courses, etc. at the City’s expense when job related, and where such training also provides a benefit to the City. Training programs may include lectures, courses, demonstrations, webinars, professional association sponsored meetings, or such other examples for the purpose of improving the effectiveness and increasing the knowledge of employees in the performance of their respective duties.

Participation and approval for training shall be at the Department Head’s sole discretion and subject to the limitations of the City’s budgeted resources. The City Manager, Department Heads, and Supervisors shall strive to ensure that employee training resources are distributed in an equitable manner, while taking into consideration the business necessity of the City for achieving various training needs. Costs associated with training may include registration, lodging, meals, and transportation, on a case- by-case basis. Means of transportation will be recommended and approved by the City Manager in accordance with the City’s administrative policies on Travel and Reimbursement, as they may be amended from time to time. 3252
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
22 1.12.2 Mandatory Training
Employees may be required to attend mandatory trainings periodically as determined by the City Manager.

SECTION 1.13 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
The political activities of City employees are governed by the provisions of Government Code Section 3201, et. seq. In addition and pursuant to Section 3201, City employees are not permitted to participate in any political activity while in the uniform of his/her employment unless on official City business. Further, City employees are not permitted to conduct or engage in any political activity or purpose during those hours that he/she should be discharging the duties of his/her position.

SECTION 1.14 USE OF CAMERAS, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE, AND GPS SYSTEMS The City utilizes video surveillance and camera systems in the workplace for business purposes including the safety and security of employees. Such cameras and video systems are located in open areas and lobbies. Employees do not have an expectation of privacy related to the City’s use of these cameras and video surveillance.

The City also maintains GPS devices on all City vehicles. Employees do not have an expectation of privacy related to the City’s use of these GPS devices.

SECTION 1.15 USE OF CITY TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES
City employees shall adhere to the City’s administrative policy on Use of City Technological Resources, as such administrative policy may be amended from time to time.

SECTION 1.16 MANAGEMENT PREROGATIVES
The City retains, whether exercised or not, solely and exclusively, all express and inherent rights and authorities with respect to determining the level of, and the manner in which, the City’s activities are conducted, managed and administered. These management rights include, but are not limited to the following:
a. The right and authority to schedule work and/or overtime work. b. The right to direct work. An employee’s job description does not restrict the type of work to which the employee can be assigned.
c. The right to discipline or to discharge employees, where applicable, subject to the procedures set forth in these Rules.
d. The right to determine assignments and to establish methods and processes by which assignments are performed.
e. The right to transfer employees within departments and to positions outside a department in a manner most advantageous to the City.
f. To evaluate employees and to schedule when an employee’s performance evaluation will occur.
3253
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
23 g. The right to determine the compensation and benefits that will be paid or provided to employees.
h. The right to make employment decisions.

SECTION 1.17 ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS
Employees shall adhere to the Political Reform Act and Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) regulations with respect to the acceptance and reporting of gifts, and with the City’s administrative policy on Ticket and Pass Distribution, as it may be amended from time to time.

Employees shall not accept compensation of any sort from anyone other than the City as consideration for the performance of an act which the employee would be required or expected to render in the regular course or hours of his/her City employment or as part of his/her duties as a City employee.

Employees who are designated under the Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code to provide an economic interest disclosure shall submit the required FPPC Form 700 upon entering office, annually, and upon exiting office, under the direction and coordination of the City Clerk, or designee.

SECTION 1.18 REMOTE WORK
The City maintains a stand-alone Remote Work Policy, employees should refer to the stand-alone policy for details regarding suitable remote work arrangements. As more detailed in the standalone policy, some positions are ineligible for remote work and are exclusively in-person.

SECTION 1.19 EMPLOYEE’S HOME ADDRESS AND STATUS OF DRIVER’S LICENSE –

DUTY TO UPDATE

1.19.1 Home Address and Related Changes
All City employees shall notify Human Resources and Risk Management regarding any change in their home address, telephone number, email address, and emergency contact information.

1.19.2 Driver’s License Changes
a. The possession of a valid California Driver’s License may be a requirement for certain City employment positions. Convictions of certain offenses or administrative action by the Department of Motor Vehicles may restrict or prohibit an employee’s ability to drive City vehicles or operate City equipment. Therefore, all employees who are required to drive a City vehicle or operate City equipment, shall promptly notify their supervisor, and the supervisor shall ensure that Human Resources and Risk Management is immediately updated on any change, temporary or permanent, in Driver’s License status.
b. These changes will be reported in writing directly to Human Resources and Risk Management. The changes will be recorded in the employee’s personnel file. . c. Changes in Driver’s License Status will be evaluated by the employee’s department head on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the employee can fulfill the 3254
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
24 essential duties of the position, as a result of a change involving temporary suspension or full revocation.

SECTION 1.20 PERSONAL APPEARANCE, GROOMING AND DRESS CODE The appearance employees project to the public and others they come in contact with while at work directly reflects on the City. In the interest of presenting a professional image to the public, the City requires all employees to observe good habits of dress, grooming, and personal hygiene.

Subject to the CROWN Act, and any other applicable law, employees must always maintain a professional image.
a. Non-uniformed employees are required to dress each day in business casual dress.

Business casual wear is a style of dress which projects a professional, business-like image while still permitting employees to wear more casual and relaxed clothing. Business casual does not include play wear, leisure wear, or beach wear. Clothing and footwear should be clean and in good repair. It may not be faded, torn, frayed, or revealing. (i) Examples of appropriate business casual wear include, but are not limited to, khaki, “Docker type”, gabardine, or wool slacks; polo, collared, or short-sleeved dress shirts; twin sets; sweaters; casual dresses and skirts; and loafer, flat, or dress sandals. (ii) Examples of inappropriate clothing include, but are not limited to, sweat pants, overalls, t-shirts (other than those provided by the City), sweatshirts (other than those provided by the City), halter tops, tops that are backless or have a low-cut neckline, any shirt with inappropriate language or artwork, athletic shorts, mini-skirts, clothing that is transparent or seethrough; dresses with spaghetti straps, hats for in-office staff, or flip flops, including “crocs” or “slippers.”
(iii) Upon the approval of an employee’s Department Head, an employee may wear casual attire on a day other than a designated casual dress day, if the employee has been assigned a task that would be unsuited to business casual or formal business attire. b. Formal Business Attire. Employees should always consider each day’s activities when determining what to wear. If an employee is representing the City at a meeting (including City Council and Commission meetings), formal business attire should be worn. c. Grooming. As part of the professional image presented to the public by the City, employees should appear for work in a clean, well-groomed manner. d. Uniforms. Uniformed employees are expected to wear their uniforms when performing normal work activities, regardless of the time of day or day of the week. All uniforms are still expected to be clean and in good repair. Uniformed employees shall not wear their uniforms while off duty, except during brief stops to and from work and during breaks, such breaks and brief stops do not include time an employee spends running personal errands. Employees may be eligible for a uniform allowance depending on their job classification. e. Tattoos. Employees may not display via tattoo, branding, or other form of body art (“collectively tattoo”) any obscene or offensive images, phrases, or expressions (including profanity and nudity) during their work shift if such material is, or may become visible to others during the employee’s work activities while on duty. Employees who have a tattoo, shall reasonably ensure that is not displayed in violation of this requirement by completely covering the 3255
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
25 tattoo with a skin-toned patch, long-sleeved uniform shirt, or other material approved by their respective department head. Employees with tattoos that are not prohibited but which the employee chooses not to display, may use similar covering options. Purchase of optional or mandatory covering options may be an appropriate use of uniform allowance for eligible employees.
f. Safety. The City may impose additional restrictions on an employee’s attire or grooming when there are safety concerns. Any such restrictions shall be issued in writing. g. Exceptions. The City Manager may grant exceptions to this policy if requested by an employee as a reasonable accommodation on the grounds that the application of this policy would infringe on an employee’s protected characteristics as set forth in Section 1.1 of this Manual, or any other legally protected status.

SECTION 1.21 NEWS MEDIA RELATIONS
From time-to-time, the City, its officials and employees are contacted by representatives of the news media, including press, radio and television. The ultimate authority and the individual responsible for the release of information to the media on behalf of the City is the City Manager.

Any media requests for information on behalf of the City shall be referred to the City Manager or his or her designee. At no time shall a City employee make any comment or release any information to the media on behalf of the City without prior approval from the City Manager or his or her designee.

SECTION 1.22 ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY
a. Attendance. Employees shall be in attendance on time at their workstation or location. Employees will make every effort to schedule personal appointments outside their working hours. Employee adherence to the rules governing attendance, leaves of absence and tardiness will be reviewed and evaluated during the employee’s annual performance evaluation.

All supervisors will keep track of employee attendance records, which will be reported to Human Resources and Risk Management.
b. Tardiness. It is the responsibility of the employee to arrive at work on or before the assigned time each day. If for some reason beyond the control of the employee, it is not possible for the employee to come to work on time, arrangements in advance with the Department Head must be made at the earliest possible time. In no case will repeat tardiness be tolerated. c. General Absences. Pre-authorized vacations, floating holidays, authorized compensatory time off, authorized paid/unpaid leaves of absence due to bona fide illness or injury, jury duty, bereavement, or other City leaves are the only types of absences permitted. All others will be considered a violation of this Manual.
d. Unauthorized Absences.

An employee who is absent for a full shift without authorization may be considered on an unauthorized leave of absence. An unauthorized leave of absence may be grounds for disciplinary action or a determination of job abandonment under these Rules. 3256
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
26 SECTION 1.23 TOBACCO, E-CIGARETTE, VAPING POLICY
Employees shall not smoke, or use tobacco, e-cigarettes, or vape in any City facility or vehicle, or within twenty feet of any City facility, or while on duty in City uniforms. A violation of this policy shall result in disciplinary action.
3257
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
27 SECTION 1.24 PERSONNEL RECORDS

1.24.1 Establishment
An employee’s official personnel file will contain all records concerning personnel actions taken, including, but not limited to, performance evaluations, benefit enrollment forms, educational courses taken, and all employment related documents that give a complete employment history.

The City Manager or designee shall keep personnel records confidential to the extent permitted by law. Personnel files may be viewed by the employee upon request. Employee medical information shall be kept in files separate from the official personnel file. Likewise, any grievances filed by an employee as well as documents reflecting a review of such grievances shall be maintained in separate confidential files.

1.24.2 Maintenance
Employees are required to inform the Human Resources and Risk Management Director, or designee, of any changes in name, address, telephone number, marital status, family status, beneficiary, or other information on file. This ensures that state and federal withholding statements, insurances and retirement records are correct. Employees may be liable for any costs incurred by the City as a result of inaccurate personnel information.

1.24.3 Release of Information Concerning City Personnel To ensure personnel information is appropriately and accurately disseminated, the Human Resources and Risk Management Director, or designee will authenticate personnel reference checks and employment verifications, and confidentially handle financial inquires originating from banks, credit unions, etc. regarding current and past City employees. Responses to third party inquiries, including financial inquiries, will be released only upon written employee authorization.

1.24.4 Procedures for Release of Information
a. All outside inquiries and reference checks shall be in writing and shall be forwarded to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director, or designee for response. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director or designee may consult with the City Attorney as to the release of the requested information. All calls for reference checks should be referred to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director.
b. Financial information will be released only after a written request has been submitted to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director or designee by the entity requesting the information, and the employee has executed a written approval to release the requested information. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director, shall verify the authenticity of the written approval to release the requested information prior to releasing an employee’s financial information.
c. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director or designee shall comply with applicable Federal and State laws regarding release of public employee information and shall consult with the City Attorney whenever there are questions concerning the release of an employee’s information. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the City from releasing information required by law, including but not limited to a subpoena or court order. 3258
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
28 d. Any employee who receives a request for a personal reference by a former or current employee is required to forward that request to the Human Resources and Risk Management Director. Only the City Manager and the Human Resources and Risk Management Director or their designees are authorized to provide references for former or current employees on behalf of the City. No other employee is authorized to provide such written or verbal references or recommendations for former or current employees. Further, no other employee is authorized to respond to questions from persons outside the City about former or current employees regarding their work performance.

1.24.5 Employees with Access to Confidential Information In performing their duties, employees may have access to confidential information, including employees’ personnel files and the personal, financial and medical information of other City employees. In addition, some City employees will be involved in some communications with the City Attorney’s Office which can be protected by the Attorney-Client privilege. Employees with such access are required to keep such information confidential.

1.24.6 Personnel/Payroll Files – Right to Inspect
a. California law provides that current and former employees (or a representative) have the right to inspect and receive a copy of the personnel files and records that relate to the employee's performance or to any grievance concerning the employee. b. Inspections shall be allowed at reasonable times and intervals, but not later than 30 calendar days from the date the City receives a written request. Upon a written request from a current or former employee, or a representative, the City shall provide a copy of the personnel records, at a charge not to exceed the actual cost of reproduction, not less than 30 calendar days from the date the City receives the request.
c. To facilitate the inspection, the City shall (1) maintain a copy of each employee's personnel records for a period of not less than three years after termination of employment, (2) make a current employee's personnel records available for inspection, and if requested by the employee or representative, provide a copy at the place where the employee reports to work, or at another location agreeable to the employer and the requester. If the employee is required to inspect or receive a copy at a location other than the place where he or she reports to work, no loss of compensation to the employee is permitted, (3) make a former employee's personnel records available for inspection, and if requested by the employee or representative, provide a copy at the location where the employer stores the records, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to a different location. The City is not required to make those personnel records or a copy available at a time when the employee is actually required to render service to the employer, if the requester is the employee.
d. The City shall take reasonable steps to verify the identity of a current or former employee or an authorized representative. Prior to making records available for inspection or providing a copy of those records, the City may redact the name, or any other personally identifying information of any other employee contained in the subject employee’s personnel files. e. The right to inspect personnel files and records does not apply to records relating to the investigation of a possible criminal offense, letters of reference, or ratings, reports, or records that (a) were obtained prior to the employee’s employment, 3259
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
29 f. were prepared by identifiable examination committee members, or (c) were obtained in connection with a promotional exam.
g. The City shall permit current and former employees to inspect or copy payroll records pertaining to that current or former employee.
3260
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
30 CHAPTER 2 – CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
SECTION 2.1 EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATIONS/AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Authorized full-time and part-time positions, with classification titles and pay ranges specified, shall be established from time to time upon adoption of a resolution by the City Council. The job descriptions for such positions shall be approved by the City Manager or his or her designee and revised as deemed necessary or desirable. Unless otherwise stated, the following definitions shall apply for purposes of Authorized Positions under this Manual:
a. Regular Full-time Employee: A full-time non-management employee who is appointed to a position for a six-month or longer term, who has successfully completed his or her probationary period in their position in the classified service and is occupying a classified position established on a continuing basis, and is employed to work at least 2080 hours per year on a regular schedule, and is eligible for the City’s retirement program and full benefits. Such positions are designated as “general” on the City’s adopted Salary Schedule. b. Regular Part-time Employee: A part-time non-management employee who is appointed to a position for a six-month or longer term, who has successfully completed his or her probationary period in their position in the classified service and is occupying a classified position established on a continuing basis, and is employed to work a minimum of 30 hours per week, and less than 2080 hours per year, and is eligible for the City’s retirement program and half the benefits of a regular full-time employee. Such positions are designated as “general” on the City’s adopted Salary Schedule.
c. Temporary Part-time Employee: A part-time non-management employee who is employed to work 29 hours per week or less. Such positions are designated as “part-time” on the City’s adopted Salary Schedule. Employees hired in this category are excluded from receiving benefits, except as otherwise expressly provided under this Manual or as required by law, and serve at the will of the City Manager. Those temporary part-time employees who are assigned such hours that result in an accumulation of 1,000 hours within the fiscal year, shall become eligible for participation in the City’s retirement program. Paid Interns shall be included in this category, as well as temporary or seasonal employees.
d. Probationary Employee: Every new employee in a regular full-time or part-time position shall serve a probationary period of twelve (12) months, exclusive of time off for leaves of absence as hereinafter permitted. The probationary employee will be evaluated periodically during the probationary period and is subject to dismissal, with or without cause, at the discretion of the City Manager. The termination can be exercised at any time during the probationary period.

Effective on the first day following completion of the probationary period, if the employee’s performance has been satisfactory and the City Manager approves his/her retention, the employee shall be considered thereafter a full-time or part-time regular employee of the city.

Probationary employees are also deemed “Disaster Service Workers” per Section 2.1.i. below. e. Exempt Employee: An employee who is exempt from the overtime provisions under applicable law.
f. Non-Exempt Employee: An employee who is covered by the overtime provisions under applicable law.
3261
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
31 g. “At-Will” Employee: A full-time management employee who is not included in the classified service. Such positions are designated as “management” on the City’s adopted Salary Schedule. Employees who are hired pursuant to Federal/State/County/Regional agency funding assisted programs are at-will employees and subject to termination when program funding terminates. An “at-will” employee may be dismissed by the City Manager at any time with or without reason and without prior notice or right of appeal. While many sections of this Manual apply to “at-will” employees, others shall not, and inclusion of those sections does not change the status of “at-will” employees. Nothing in this Manual or in any document or statement shall limit the right to terminate an “at-will” employee without prior notice, without any reason, and without a right to appeal the termination decision.
h. Volunteer/Unpaid Interns: An individual who accepts an unpaid position with the City to perform specific tasks. A volunteer or unpaid intern is not an employee, and can be released at any time and for any reason without the right of appeal. i. Disaster Service Workers: The protection of the health and safety, and preservation of lives and property of the citizens of the City of Eastvale from the effects of natural, manmade, or war-caused emergencies which result in conditions of disaster or in extreme peril to life, property and resources is of paramount City importance requiring the responsible efforts of public and private agencies and individual citizens. In furtherance of the exercise of the power of the City in protection of its citizens and resources, ALL City employees are hereby declared to be Disaster Service Workers subject to such disaster service activities as may be assigned to them by their superiors or by law.

SECTION 2.2 WORKWEEK AND SCHEDULES

2.2.1 General Policy
a. The City’s standard workweek for all employees begins at 12:00 a.m. each Monday and ends at the following Sunday at 11:59 p.m. The City may establish additional standard workweek schedules to accommodate other unique circumstances. b. City Hall’s normal operating hours are 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday. City Hall is closed every Friday.
c. Depending on City requirements, some employees may be required to work different schedules, which may include working outside of City Hall’s normal operating hours.

Each employee’s scheduled hours of work will be determined based on staffing requirements to meet the needs of the City and our business objectives. Therefore, the City reserves the right to schedule employees to work an earlier or later schedule. d. Variations in work schedules may be approved by the City Manager, however, must be requested and approved in writing prior to the employee making any changes to their schedule. Such requests will be evaluated as to their impact on the needs of the City, and to ensure appropriate and adequate staff coverage, in considering the request for a modified schedule.
e. The City reserves the right to change an employee’s work schedule to meet the needs of the City.
3262
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
32 2.2.2 Full-time Exempt (Salaried) Employees Work Schedule Exempt (salaried) employees are generally expected to maintain the same work schedule and office hours as non-exempt employees unless pre-authorized by the employees’ pertinent Department Head. The City will consider the need for exempt employees to have some flexibility in the work schedule, to the extent that exempt employees demonstrate that they are meeting the requirements of their position (including any supervisory obligations), and that a minimum of forty (40) hours per week is achieved, which shall include use of approved leaves from time banks (e.g. sick leave, vacation leave, etc.). Variances in the employee’s regular schedule must be discussed and approved in advance by the pertinent Department Head. In all cases, the business needs of the City and its residents must be a top priority. Any perceived abuse of the City’s flexibility, and/or failure of the exempt employee to fully perform their job duties or to fulfill the required forty (40) hours will result in the loss of privilege for flexibility. Exempt employees shall not receive less than forty (40) hours per week compensation as salaried employees, except as permitted by law. Such instances should be discussed with the Human Resources and Risk Management Director for appropriate review and handling.

Exempt employees shall work extra hours as needed to perform their duties, to attend special events, and/or to attend meetings after hours as required by the pertinent Department Head.

Exempt employees receive leave in recognition of the extra hours they are expected to work.

2.2.3 Regular Full-time Non-Exempt (Hourly) Employees Work Schedule All full-time non-exempt (hourly) employees shall work one of the following assigned shifts: 1) 7:30 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. with an unpaid thirty-minute (30) meal period; 2) 7:00 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. with an unpaid thirty (30) minute meal period; or 3) 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. with an unpaid one (1) hour meal period. Other variations may be authorized by the pertinent Department Head on a caseby-case basis, subject to City Manager approval.

2.2.4 Part-time Non-Exempt (Hourly) Employees Work Schedule All part-time non-exempt (hourly) employees shall work designated hours as established by their supervisors and department heads, and shall be eligible for rest and meal breaks consistent with the rules for full-time non-exempt employees.

2.2.5 Make-up Time for Non-Exempt (Hourly) Employees
a. Make-up time is available for all regular full-time, regular part-time, and temporary part-time employees who are paid on an hourly basis (non-exempt, as defined under section 2.1(f) above).
b. The City does not require employees to work make up time. Make-up time allows a non-exempt employee to voluntarily request time off for a personal obligation and to make up the time on another day in the same workweek.
c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, non-exempt employees will be paid overtime when more than forty (40) hours are worked in a workweek. Sick leave, vacation leave, holidays, or other leaves are not hours worked and shall not be counted towards the calculation of overtime. d. Requests must be submitted in writing to the employee’s immediate supervisor.

The employee’s immediate supervisor will review the employee’s request and discuss with the 3263
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
33 Department Head. The request must be approved in advance by the employee’s supervisor and Department Head prior to performing any make- up time. Please note that the City cannot guarantee make-up time will be approved or provided.
e. Advance notice is required in order that the City may plan for work coverage.

Employees are required to provide the City with seventy-two (72) hours’ notice, except in the case of emergencies. Same-day requests are discouraged, and will be considered on a case-by-case basis and in emergency situations.
f. Any perceived abuse of the City’s flexibility (e.g. failure to provide advance notice on a recurring basis) will result in denial of make-up time request.

2.2.6 Special Events, City Council Meetings, and Commission Meetings All employees may be required to work special events i.e. EEK!Vale, Miracle Holiday Event, National Night Out, and other similar events, and may be required to attend City Council, Commission and/or other meetings. Compensation for such hours worked shall be provided consistent with this Manual as required by law. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Manual, non-exempt employees working special events will be paid at 1.5x their regular rate of pay for working such special events during a workweek where an observed holiday occurs, the employee receives holiday pay for such observed holiday, and the employee’s holiday hours and total hours worked exceed forty (40) hours for such workweek. For the purpose of this Manual “special events” does not include City Council and Commission meetings.

SECTION 2.3 PAYROLL PROCESSING

2.3.1 General Information
The City processes payroll on a bi-weekly basis with twenty-six (26) pay periods in each calendar year. Payday will be the Thursday following the close of the pay period and is paid on Thursday by direct deposit.

2.3.2 New Hires and Employee Changes
Human Resources and Risk Management provides all applicable new hire personnel forms to each new employee, and prepares the Personnel Action Form (PAF) for all newly hired employees. Personnel Action Forms are also required for any employee changes including, but not limited to, position change, salary increase, benefit change, etc. The Personnel Action Form identifies programs and account numbers the employee’s time will be charged to and must be approved by the City Manager, Finance Director, Human Resources & Risk Management Director, and Department Head. Human Resources and Risk Management enters new employee data into the payroll system. The Human Resources and Risk Management Director, reviews the entries for completeness and accuracy.

2.3.3 Time Sheets
a. All Non-Exempt Employees:
(i) All-time records, including time sheets, represent legal documents that are used to accurately record working time and to compensate employees properly. All non-exempt employees shall record accurately all exact time worked. 3264
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
34 (ii) To ensure the accuracy of all-time records, non-exempt employees will input their own time into the electronic timesheet system and acknowledge that they recorded all hours worked accurately, received all rest and meal periods as required under this Manual, and reported any injuries or on the job illnesses to their supervisor. (iii) Non-exempt employees must ensure that the time sheets are submitted on the day and prior to the cut-off time designated by the City. (iv) Under no circumstances shall a Supervisor or employee input time on behalf of another employee. Limited exceptions to this may be granted by Human Resources and Risk Management in the case of an emergency or absence. Where so authorized, employees may instead provide their time sheet information via written/email communication. b. Exempt Employees: All exempt (salaried) employees must complete time sheets in order to record regular time worked and exception hours (e.g. sick leave, vacation, etc.). c. Supervisors:
(i) Supervisors shall review and address potential issues in time entries.

Supervisors shall approve each time sheet via the electronic timesheet system, attesting to the completion of such review and that the time recorded reflects all work performed by the employee of which the supervisor was reasonably aware.
(A) To carry out this duty, supervisors are responsible for daily monitoring of the following for non-exempt employees:
• Start time for each workday;
• Start time for each meal period;
• End time for each meal period;
• End time for each workday;
• Whether a meal period is taken (if no meal period is taken, this must be stated);
• All actual time taken as paid leave; and
• Any additional time during which work is performed, including work performed outside the regular shift.

2.3.4 Deductions
Any benefit or insurance deductions associated with payroll will be withheld from the first and second paycheck of each month. Cafeteria cash outs will be paid in two equal payments on the first and second paycheck of each month. With bi-weekly pay periods, there are two (2) months during the year that a third paycheck will be received. There will not be any benefit/insurance deductions taken on the third paycheck of a month.

2.3.5 Issuance of Paychecks
After all entries have been verified and applicable corrections made, payroll checks are processed.

The paychecks are scanned and kept in a secure location until payday. Human Resources and Risk Management distributes pay stubs to all employees on pay day. 3265
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
35 2.3.6 Final Payment upon Separation of Employment
Human Resources and Risk Management prepares and processes the final paycheck including payoff for unused accrued vacation and any other vested leave with a provision for cash payout at termination under this Manual. After receipt of the approved Personnel Action Form and approved time sheet, the City Manager reviews the calculations and proof list before providing approval for issuing an employee’s final paycheck.

SECTION 2.4 REST AND MEAL PERIODS – NON-EXEMPT (HOURLY) EMPLOYEES a. Employees whose total daily work time is at least 3.5 hours must take a mandatory paid rest period of fifteen (15) minutes. A fifteen (15) minute rest period is mandatory for every four (4) hours worked, or “major fraction thereof.” As much as practicable, the rest break should be taken in the middle of the work period.
b. Employees who work more than five (5) hours must take an unpaid, off-duty meal period of at least thirty (30) minutes.
c. Employees who work more than ten (10) hours are entitled to a second unpaid meal break.

In the event that an employee cannot be completely relieved of all duties during a meal break, the employee will be paid during the meal break, and such time shall constitute hours worked. d. Employees should refrain from taking rest and meal breaks at their desks to ensure that a bona fide, uninterrupted rest and meal break has been taken. e. Rest breaks are treated as hours worked, and are paid as time worked. f. Rest and meal breaks may not be saved or used at another time or to make up a late arrival, or to shorten the workday. Rest breaks shall not be combined with meal periods to provide an extended meal period.
g. Rest and meal breaks may not be taken within one (1) hour of starting time, or quitting time unless special circumstances make this desirable, and in which case prior approval shall be obtained from the employee’s immediate supervisor. h. Non-exempt employees must accurately record each meal period on the timecard.

Each meal break must be at least 30 minutes long.
i. Supervisors are responsible for ensuring that employees are provided the opportunity for rest and meal breaks in accordance with these rules. Supervisors are also responsible for scheduling meal and rest breaks to provide for appropriate coverage of work.

SECTION 2.5 OVERTIME COMPENSATION/COMPENSATORY TIME OFF Non-exempt (hourly) employees who work more than forty (40) hours in a workweek shall be compensated at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) times the employee’s regular rate of pay, either as paid time at one and one-half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay or as compensatory time off accrued at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty (40) in any workweek. For the purposes of this policy, holidays, sick leave usage, 3266
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
36 vacation leave usage, jury duty leave and other pre- scheduled time off shall not be considered work time, towards the calculation of overtime. Non-exempt employees may not “volunteer” work time to perform duties that are the same or similar as their stated or regular job duties.

The following provisions apply to Compensatory Time Off (CTO):
a. Non-exempt employees may choose to be compensated for overtime work through compensatory time off (CTO) at the rate of one and one-half hours CTO per overtime hour worked, instead of receiving cash payment. The decision to receive overtime pay or CTO credit must be made at the end of the workweek in which the overtime is worked, at the employee’s option, provided that the employee has not accrued the maximum CTO allowed under this policy and subject to approval by the Department Head and/or City Manager or designee. b. Employees may accrue CTO up to a maximum of 120 (equivalent to 80 hours of worked overtime). If an employee reaches this maximum limit they will be paid for all overtime worked until the CTO balance has been reduced below 120 hours. c. Employees who request to use accrued CTO will be permitted to use the CTO within a reasonable period after making the request so long as the use of CTO does not unduly disrupt the operations of the City as determined by the Department Head. Employees may not be forced to use compensatory time already held, but may be encouraged to reduce the amount of accrued hours.
d. Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (e), Employees may not convert unused CTO to cash-out pay except at termination of employment or upon change in eligibility for CTO accrual. Unused CTO shall be paid out at the rate of pay required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The rate of pay required by the FLSA is the higher of (i) the average regular rate received by the employee during the last 3 years of employment, or (ii) the final regular rate received by the employee.
e. The City will convert unused CTO to cash-out for all employees with unused CTO in their CTO balance, on the first pay period of each November. Unused CTO shall be paid out at the rate of pay required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The rate of pay required by the FLSA is the higher of (i) the average regular rate received by the employee during the last 3 years of employment, or (ii) the final regular rate received by the employee SECTION 2.6 BI-LINGUAL PAY
Regular full-time and regular part time employees who are certified as bi-lingual by the City in accordance with these provisions and who are routinely and consistently assigned to provide bilingual services in positions requiring communication skills in languages other than English are eligible for bilingual pay. Bi-lingual pay may be suspended for employees who are on a leave of absence from the City. The City may pro-rate the employee’s bi-lingual pay based on the length of the leave of absence.

Eligible regular full-time employees may receive an additional $150.00 per month for bi-lingual services, and eligible regular part-time employees may receive an additional $75.00 per month.

The City Manager will be the final authority to determine which positions are eligible to receive bilingual pay, to assign and approve bi-lingual pay, and to remove bi-lingual pay from employees based on business necessity. Each Department Head will be able to provide recommendations to the City Manager regarding the languages needed and the total number of staff to provide 3267
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
37 services to the public. Employees being considered for bi-lingual services shall be required to pass a bi-lingual proficiency test for both speaking and writing skills. Human Resources and Risk Management will arrange for the testing, as required. Employees who pass the tests, and are considered certified, shall receive their bi-lingual pay effective the pay period following certification.

To the extent permitted by law, the value of the compensation for bi-lingual pay is considered special compensation and shall be reported as such to CalPERS pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) (for Classic Members) or Title 2 CCR Section 571.1(b)(3) (for New Members) – Special Assignment Pay. Bi-lingual pay shall be reported to CalPERS periodically when earned, on a per pay period basis. However, the City makes no representations or guarantees whatsoever with respect to whether CalPERS shall include said bi-lingual pay as compensation for purposes of benefit determination and CalPERS shall make the sole determination as to inclusion.

SECTION 2.7 TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENTS
Employees may be temporarily assigned higher or lower duties without a change in pay and such action shall not be deemed as a transfer, demotion, promotion, or reclassification. In all cases where periodic or regular variations in assignments occur because of seasonal or operational needs, the nature of the duties, the work schedule or a position from which the incumbent is on extended leave of absence, such variations shall be considered as incidental to the position.

2.7.1 Acting Assignment to Higher Position
Acting appointments may be used to fill positions that are vacant or that are temporarily vacant, such as when an employee is on an extended leave of absence. a. Whenever the needs of the City require an employee to temporarily perform the duties of a higher classification than that in which the employee is currently employed for a period of more than twelve (12) consecutive working days, the employee shall receive the salary rate of the higher class in which the employee is performing the required duties. In such cases, the employee shall be paid at an appropriate step of the current salary schedule of the higher classification which will assure an increase of not less than 5% greater than the salary of the employee’s current position, but in no case shall such salary exceed the top salary step of the higher classification. The higher salary rate payable shall commence on the thirteenth working day following the temporary reassignment to the performance of duties of the higher classification.

The requirement for the performance of duties of the higher classification shall be placed in writing by the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, following recommendation by the affected Department Head. No employee shall be required to perform any of the duties of a higher classification unless that employee is deemed to possess the minimum qualification of the higher classification by the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, as recommended by the affected Department Head.
b. The employee assigned to perform the duties of a higher classification shall not serve for more than ninety (90) working days in a higher classification whenever a vacancy exists without the announcement by the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, of an approved examination as otherwise provided in this Manual. In no case shall an employee serve more than 960 hours in a fiscal year or six (6) total months, whichever comes first, in a higher classification without successfully passing the examination.
c. An employee appointed in an acting capacity shall be eligible to receive performance increases in the permanent position during the acting appointment but shall not be 3268
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
38 entitled to performance increases in the position which the employee holds in an acting capacity.

If successful in being promoted, the period of time of service in the higher classification shall be credited for the promoted employee toward the required period of probation for the higher classification as otherwise required in these rules.
d. The City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, shall obtain the employee’s written consent for the temporary performance of any of the duties of the higher classification beyond a period of twelve (12) working days, prior to an employee assuming or continuing the duties and compensation of a higher classification, which consent shall clearly state that it is understood that employee’s salary rate will revert to the salary rate in the employee’s permanent position upon the expiration of the need for the performance of the duties of the higher classification.

SECTION 2.8 CALL BACK PAY
Call back duty occurs when a non-exempt employee is ordered to return to duty on a nonregularly scheduled work shift. Call back does not occur when an employee is held over from his/her prior shift or is working prior to his/her regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of two (2) hours work commencing at the time of the call or contact. Any call back lasting two (2) hours or less shall result in a credit for two (2) hours worked. A subsequent call received during a call back shall not result in an additional two (2) hours minimum call back pay, but shall be paid as actual time worked. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Manual, call back hours will be paid at 1.5x the employee’s regular rate of pay during a workweek where an observed holiday occurs, the employee receives holiday pay for such observed holiday, and the employee’s holiday hours and total hours worked exceed forty (40) hours for such workweek.

SECTION 2.9 ON CALL (STANDBY) PAY
Non-exempt (hourly) employees may be assigned to twenty-four (24) hours on call duty on a week- end, holiday or non-scheduled work day, or on call duty between regularly scheduled work shifts, requiring the employee to respond to emergency calls. Response to emergency calls shall occur within sixty (60) minutes from the time the employee receives the communication.

Response calls may require the employee to report back to work.

An employee serving on-call under this section shall receive two hours of the employee’s regular rate of pay per on-call assignment, regardless of the on-call assignment duration. Said compensation is exclusive of any other compensation that may be provided for time worked. Nonworking on-call hours shall not count as hours worked, however, compensation for such hours shall count towards calculating the employee’s regular rate of pay. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an employee serving on-call during a workweek where an observed holiday occurs and the employee receives holiday pay for such observed holiday, will receive two hours paid at 1.5x the employee’s regular rate of pay per on-call assignment, regardless of the on-call assignment duration.

SECTION 2.10 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE
The City Manager may approve an automobile allowance, not to exceed $400 per month, for select Department Heads and management employees as determined appropriate by the City Manager. There is no right to an automobile allowance and the City Manager may reduce or eliminate a previously approved automobile allowance at any time. Department Heads and 3269
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
39 management employees who receive an automobile allowance shall do so in lieu of receiving a mileage reimbursement from the City for use of their personal vehicle for City-related travel.

SECTION 2.11 PHONE ALLOWANCE
The City Manager shall designate those positions requiring either the issuance of a cell phone for the conduct of City business, or the provision of a cell phone allowance in the amount of $40 per month, when designated employees use their own phone.

SECTION 2.12 SALARY AND WAGE SCHEDULES
The salary and wage schedule for authorized full-time and part-time positions shall be established from time to time upon adoption of a resolution by the City Council.

The City complies with all applicable state and federal laws regarding equal pay. Compensation to employees shall be based upon job classification and defined factors including education, training, experience, consequence of action, essential functions/duties and responsibilities, judgment/decision-making, and supervision received and exercised. In all cases, wages shall not be based on factors prohibited by law.

SECTION 2.13 ADVANCEMENT WITHIN THE SCHEDULE

2.13.1 Merit Increases
The City Manager may authorize merit-based salary increases within the authorized salary range based on an employee's ability, proficiency, and performance. The annual merit increase will be determined at the City Manager’s sole discretion, however, generally, such merit increase will be up to 5%. In cases of extraordinary performance, the City Manager may approve a maximum merit increase of up to 10%. Employees who receive a performance rating of "needs improvement" or lower will not be eligible for a merit increase for the rating period. If, in the Department Head’s sole discretion, the employee demonstrates sustained improvement, the Department Head may prepare an interim performance evaluation and recommend a salary increase to the City Manager.

2.13.2 Special Merit Increases
The City Manager, upon recommendation from a Department Head, may approve a Special Merit Increase for an eligible employee. Department Heads shall discuss such instances with the City Manager and prepare a memorandum to document superior, outstanding and meritorious performance warranting such special monetary recognition. Such increases shall not exceed 5% and are subject to the approval of the City Manager. Special Merit Increases shall typically occur outside the employee’s normal rating period. An employee receiving a Special Merit Increase shall remain eligible for their normal merit increase at the prescribed evaluation period. Special Merit Increases shall be rare exceptions, not the rule, and may not exceed the maximum of the established salary range.
3270
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
40 SECTION 2.14 CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT STATUS

2.14.1 Transfer
The City Manager, may, at any time, transfer an employee from one position to another position in the same or comparable class. A comparable class is one with essentially the same maximum salary limits, involves the performance of similar duties, and requires substantially the same basic qualifications. Transfer shall not be used to effectuate a promotion, demotion, advancement, or reduction, each of which may be accomplished only as provided in this Manual. No person shall be transferred to a position for which he/she does not possess the minimum qualifications.

2.14.2 Promotion
A promotion is the appointment of an employee from one classification to a classification having a higher base salary range.

A current employee selected for promotion following an open recruitment, as provided in section

1.6.2 above, may negotiate a competitive salary following promotion. An employee promoted following an open recruitment will at least receive the entrance rate of the new range or a five percent (5%) increase in salary, whichever is greater. Under no circumstance will a promoted employee be advanced above the final step of the higher base salary range.

Employees selected for promotion following an internal recruitment, as provided in section 1.6.1 above, shall receive the entrance rate of the new range or a five percent (5%) increase in salary, whichever is greater.

The promotion effective date shall be the first day of the pay period following the approval of the appointment.

2.14.3 Reclassification
An employee whose position has been reclassified from one class to another class, which has a higher base salary range, shall be placed at the entrance point of the new range or at a step within the range that is not less than 5% and not more than 10% increase in salary. Ensuing merit increases will be due one (1) year from the date of the adopted reclassification. Reclassified employees are not required to serve a probationary period.

2.14.4 Demotion
A demotion is the appointment of an employee from one classification to a classification having a lower maximum rate of pay.
a. An employee demoted for disciplinary reasons shall be placed on the same step within the base salary range of the class to which demoted. b. A promotional probationary employee who is returned to former classification during the probationary period shall be placed on the same step within the base salary range or the former classification that the employee was on at time of promotion. No credit shall be granted for time spent at the promoted level for next step advance due date. 3271
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
41 c. An employee demoted for non-disciplinary reasons shall be retained at the same salary rate, provided that the salary rate does not exceed the maximum of the salary range of the demoted class. With the approval of the City Manager, the employee may be “Y-rated” (rate of pay is frozen at the rate of pay immediately prior to the demotion). The rate of pay of an employee that is Y-rated will not change until the employee’s classification salary scale and step equals or exceeds their Y-rated level.
d. An employee who voluntarily demotes from one classification to a classification with a lower maximum salary range shall be placed within the new salary range.

2.14.5 Suspension
The City Manager may suspend, and approve the recommendation of a Department Head, to suspend an employee at any time for just cause, in accordance with Chapter 5 of this Manual.

2.14.6 Reinstatement
With the approval of the City Manager, a regular employee who has resigned with a good record may be reinstated within one (1) year to his/her former position, if vacant, or to a vacant position in the same, comparable, or lesser class provided he/she possesses the minimum qualifications for the position.

Reinstated employees do not retain any benefits or rights previously earned by virtue of his/her former employment unless approved by the City Manager. The employee will be appointed as a new employee and serve a new probationary period, unless specifically waived in writing by the City Manager. No credit for former employment shall be granted in computing salary, vacation, or other benefits except on the specific recommendation of the City Manager at the time of reinstatement unless otherwise required by law. The employee shall have a new hire date that is applicable to all benefits, including retirement and retirement health benefits, unless otherwise required by law.

SECTION 2.15 TRAVEL EXPENSES
The City’s administrative policies on Travel and Reimbursement, as they may be amended from time to time, shall serve to provide policy related to this topic.

SECTION 2.16 EDUCATIONAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
The City will provide all employees with educational expense reimbursement for courses which relate to their job duties or the completion of a degree in a field related to City operations, subject to City Manager approval, at the City Manager’s sole discretion. An employee may be reimbursed for up to $2,500 per fiscal year, not to exceed a cumulative total of $10,000 for full-time employees and $5,000 for part-time employees. Note: Reimbursement under this section do not encompass expenses related to any certificates or licenses that are required as provided in an employee’s job description. Such expenses are directly reimbursed to the employee and are not subject to the requirements for reimbursement under this section.

To be eligible for reimbursement under this section, an employee must satisfactorily complete 12 months of employment prior to qualifying for course approval and subsequent reimbursement. If eligible, an employee must do the following to obtain reimbursement: 1) receive course approval prior to registration from Human Resources and Risk Management, Department Head, and City 3272
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
42 Manager; 2) provide Human Resources with evidence of satisfactory ("C" grade or better) completion of the approved course. Human Resources and Risk Management shall, at its own sole discretion, make a determination as to whether the evidence provided by the employee of satisfactory course completion is sufficient; 3) submit receipts for tuition, enrollment fees, and/or books within 60 days of course completion; and 4) sign a form agreeing to repay the City the reimbursed amount if the employee voluntarily separates from the City or is terminated for cause within 24 months of the date of the reimbursement.

If there is insufficient funding to pay for all pending or anticipated future reimbursement requests, the City Manager may devise a fair and equitable manner for allocating the funds available amongst the eligible employees.
3273
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
43 CHAPTER 3 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
SECTION 3.1 HOLIDAYS
All regular full-time employees, regular part-time employees, at-will full time employees, and fulltime and part-time employees who are in their probationary period, shall have the following holidays as time off with pay:

1. January 1st, known as “New Year’s Day”

2. The third Monday in January, known as “Martin Luther King Jr. Day”

3. The third Monday in February, known as “Presidents’ Day”

4. The fourth Monday in May, known as “Memorial Day”

5. July 4th, known as “Independence Day”

6. The first Monday in September, known as “Labor Day”

7. November 11th, known as “Veteran’s Day”

8. The fourth Thursday in November, known as “Thanksgiving Day”

9. The day after Thanksgiving Day

10. December 24th, known as “Christmas Eve Day”

11. December 25th, known as “Christmas Day”

12. One (1) floating holiday.

The City Council may approve additional paid holiday(s) for employees in any given fiscal year from time to time by resolution.

In the event a holiday falls upon a Friday or Saturday, the prior workday will be taken in lieu of the holiday; in the event a holiday falls upon a Sunday, the following workday will be taken in lieu of the holiday. Holidays occurring during an employee’s vacation shall be treated as a paid holiday.

Employees who are absent from work on a holiday due to unpaid leave of any form, shall not receive reimbursement or payment for the missed holiday.

All regular part-time employees and regular part-time employees who are in their probation period shall receive the defined holidays as time off with pay at one-half (1/2) (e.g. 5 hours paid holiday).

Floating holidays will be provided at the beginning of the calendar year. Floating holidays not used during the calendar year in which they are provided will be converted to vacation time and treated in the same manner as provided in Section 4.2 of this Manual, including counting toward an employee’s maximum vacation accrual and the vacation buy-back provisions.

In addition to the holiday pay provided in this section , non-exempt employees working during the observed day of any of the following holidays or the actual day of the following holidays: Martin Luther King Jr. Day; President’s Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; or Labor Day, will be paid 1.5x their regular rate of pay for hours worked during such observed day of the foregoing holidays or the actual day of the foregoing holidays. If an employee works both, the observed day of the forgoing holidays and the actual day of the foregoing holidays, such employee will only receive 1.5x their regular rate of pay for hours worked during the day they work more hours.

SECTION 3.2 WINTER HOLIDAY CLOSURE
City Hall closes to the public during the winter holiday period beginning December 17 through January 1 of each year (actual dates may vary depending on the day of the week the holiday falls).

Certain City operations may continue during this Winter Holiday Closure while others will not, as determined appropriate by the City Manager.
3274
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
44 In conjunction with the City paid holidays, including December 24th, December 25th, December 31st, and January 1st, employees not required to work during all or a portion of the Winter Holiday Closure will be required to use their accrued leave time (vacation, compensatory, exempt employee leave, or floating holiday time) to equal the remainder of their regular work schedule hours/days during the Winter Holiday Closure.

The City Manager may approve an employee’s ability to work during the Winter Holiday Closure based on the City’s needs and at the City Manager’s sole discretion.

If an employee is ordered to return to duty during the Winter Holiday Closure, the time called back during regular work hours will be deducted from the leave hours being used.

SECTION 3.3 INSURANCE BENEFITS
All employees in regular full-time or regular part-time positions, shall be eligible for the City’s insurance benefits which may include medical, dental, vision, life, short-term and long-term disability insurance policies including Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D), or, alternatively in a recognized cafeteria plan approved by the City Council. These benefits may be increased or decreased from time to time. The City reserves the right to change carriers and/or eliminate any type of coverage at its absolute discretion. No employee has any vested right to any type of insurance coverage or benefits.

3.3.1 Cafeteria Plan
New employees who are hired between the first and the 14th day of the month are eligible for the full amount of the City’s cafeteria plan contribution for the first month of employment. Employees hired on or after the 15th of the month are eligible to receive one-half (1/2) of the City’s cafeteria plan contribution for the first month of employment.

As of the most recent revision to this Manual, the City’s contribution towards the cafeteria plan for full-time employees is $2,721.01 per month. This amount reflects the current Kaiser Permanente Region III monthly premium for subscriber and 2+ dependents plus $250. Regular part-time employees receive $1250.03 per month. Should the premium for the Kaiser Permanente Region III monthly premium for subscriber and 2+ dependents increase, the City will provide an automatic annual increase on January 1 of each year to the cafeteria plan allowance commensurate with such premium increase to such plan up to a maximum of 5% per annum. Regular part-time employees will receive a pro-rata 50% of such increase amount on an annual basis.

City Council may amend the amount provided as contribution under this section from time to time by resolution.
a. Cafeteria Cashout for Employees Hired Before December 1, 2017 Full-time employees hired before December 1, 2017, are eligible to receive up to $1,600 per month of their unused cafeteria allowance as cash out benefit on a monthly basis. Part-time employees hired before December 1, 2017, are eligible to receive up to $800 per month of their unused cafeteria allowance as cash out benefit on a monthly basis. Cashout amount is divided equally between the first and second paycheck of each month. b. Cafeteria Cashout for Employees Hired After December 1, 2017 but Before July 1, 2024
3275
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
45 Full-time employees hired after December 1, 2017, but before July 1, 2024, are eligible to receive up to $800 per month of their unused cafeteria allowance as cash out benefit on a monthly basis.

Part-time employees hired after December 1, 2017, but before July 1, 2024, are eligible to receive up to $400 per month of their unused cafeteria allowance as cash out benefit on a monthly basis.

Cashout amount is divided equally between the first and second paycheck of each month. c. Cafeteria Cashout for Employees Hired After July 1, 2024 Employees hired on or after July 1, 2024, have two options regarding use of their cafeteria allowance: (i) elect coverage in a City plan eligible for credit from the cafeteria allowance. No cashout of unused cafeteria allowance will be provided; or (ii) waive coverage from all City plans eligible for credit from the cafeteria allowance and receive cashout of their unused cafeteria allowance according to the following: full-time employees will receive $800 per month and parttime employees will receive $400 per month as cash out benefit on a monthly basis. Cashout amount is divided equally between the first and second paycheck of each month.

3.3.2 Life Insurance
Life insurance coverage shall be provided by the City for eligible employees and elected officials as follows:

Level 1 – City Manager – 3x annual salary to a maximum of $500,000.

Level 2 – Management – 2x annual salary to a maximum of $400,000.

Level 2 – All Other Eligible Employees – 2x annual salary with a minimum of $100,000 and a maximum of $250,000.

Employees who are eligible for exempt employee leave under Section 4.15 shall be considered management employees for the purposes of life insurance benefits.

Life insurance premiums for eligible employees are paid for by the City.

3.3.3 Short Term Disability Insurance and Long-Term Disability Insurance The City does not participate in the State of California’s Disability Insurance (SDI) program which includes the paid family leave program. Employees remain eligible for “unpaid” family and medical leave as provided by State and Federal leave laws. Employees should refer to the City’s Family Care and Medical Leave, Pregnancy Disability Leave, and Military Family Leave Policy for additional details, including eligibility and use of accrued leave to receive pay during leave.

The City’s Short-Term Disability plan provides a maximum benefit period of 83 days, and the Long-Term Disability program goes into effect after 90 days. The City uses a third-party company as the plan administrator. Additional plan information, including elimination periods, and the monthly benefit amounts may be obtained from Human Resources and Risk Management. ShortTerm and Long-Term disability insurance premiums for eligible employees are paid for by the City.

3.3.4 Compensation During Parental Leave
The City has contracted with Parento to provide wage replacement, up to $3,500.00 per week as provided in the agreement between Parento and the City, during an employee’s eligible leave of absence due to the birth of their child, child adoption, child foster care placement, or placement via a government child protection service. This section does not create an independent leave right, 3276
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
46 rather, this section merely provides a wage replacement plan for employees who are taking parental leave, as provided under a separate City leave entitlement. Wage replacement under this section is available for up to twelve weeks per qualifying event.

SECTION 3.4 RETIREMENT BENEFITS

3.4.1 CalPERS Enrollment
Eligible employees shall be members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS). The City is a member of CalPERS. Eligible employees are required to participate in accordance with the rules of CalPERS. Employees pay the full amount of the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. Retirement health insurance benefits are provided to retirees in compliance with the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) and City Council Resolution No. 2011-03. The City shall pay no more than the monthly minimum employer contribution prescribed by Government Code section 22892 and Resolution No. 2011-03 toward retiree health benefits.

3.4.2 Accumulation Program for Part-Time and Limited-Service Employees Except as otherwise provided by law, employees not eligible for membership in CalPERS, shall be enrolled in the Accumulation Program for Part-Time and Limited-Service Employees (APPLE) in lieu of enrollment in the federal Social Security Retirement System. APPLE-enrolled employees will pay 3.75% of salary into the program and the City will match that amount. Accumulated funds in APPLE will earn interest on contributions. More information about APPLE can be received from Human Resources and Risk Management.

3.4.3 Deferred Compensation Plan
Regular full-time and regular part-time employees are eligible to contribute to the City’s 457(b) deferred compensation plan by electing a deduction amount or percentage, subject to maximum limits as designated by the Internal Revenue Service, from each paycheck. Employees may contribute to a pre tax or Roth type account, subject to plan rules and Internal Revenue Service Rules. Employees are immediately vested in their contributions to the 457(b) plan. a. Matching Contribution for Full-time Employees: The City will provide a 200% matching contribution of the employee’s contribution into a 401(a) plan up to a maximum of $3,000.00 per calendar year. Employees are immediately vested in the City’s matching contributions to the 401(a) plan.
b. Matching Contribution for Part-time Employees: The City will provide a 200% matching contribution of the employee’s contribution into a 401(a) plan up to a maximum of $1,500.00 per calendar year. Employees are immediately vested in the City’s matching contributions to the 401(a) plan.
3277
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
47 3.4.4 Retiree Health Reimbursement-defined Contribution Plan To reward regular employees for their continued City service, the City has established a Health Reimbursement-defined Contribution Plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide eligible employees, as defined in subparagraph (a), and qualifying family members, as defined in subparagraph (b), with a health reimbursement fund that they may use for eligible health care related expenses, as defined under section 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, during retirement. The City will contribute to each eligible employee’s account based on the contribution table provided in subparagraph (c). Upon eligibility, employees are immediately fully vested in such contributions and are eligible to access funds upon service retirement or following separation from the City for another reason, subject to plan rules and regulations. During City employment, the City will pay account plan administration fees. Employees will be responsible for their own administration fees upon separation from City employment. a. Eligibility Requirement
Regular full-time and regular part-time employees are eligible to receive benefits under this section upon completion of five (5) consecutive years of City service. Time served as a temporary employee, intern, whether paid or unpaid, limited term appointment employee, or volunteer does not count towards the five (5) year service requirement. Time served in probation status for a regular full-time or regular part-time position does count towards the five (5) years service requirement.

If an employee separates from City employment and is subsequently rehired, prior duration of City employment will not count towards the calculation of the total number of years of service for the purpose of eligibility or the purpose of determining the amount of monthly contribution to the employee’s account. For example, if an employee separates from City service after 4 years of continuous service, but is rehired following three months of separation, the employee must serve an additional 5 consecutive years from the rehire date to become eligible under this section 3.4.4 and upon eligibility, the employee will receive contribution at level “A” as provided in subparagraph (c) below.
b. Qualifying Family Members
For the purpose of this section 3.4.4, “qualifying family members” means any individual the employee claims as a dependent on their filed tax return for the relevant calendar year. c. Contribution Schedule
The City will make contributions under this section 3.4.4 according to the following schedule:

Contribution
Level
Months of Continuous
Service
Monthly Contribution
for Full-time
Employees
Monthly Contribution for
Part-time Employees
A 60 months - 119 months $100.00 $50.00
B 120 months - 179 months $125.00 $62.50
C 180 months - 239 months $150.00 $75.00
3278
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
48 D 240 months – 299 months $175.00 $87.50
E 300 months - until
separation
$200.00 $100.00
SECTION 3.5 TEMPORARY PART-TIME EMPLOYEES
Employees of the City designated as temporary part-time (regularly less than 20 hours per week and no more than 1000 hours in a fiscal year) are non-benefitted and shall be compensated on an hourly basis as specified by the position classification in which they are assigned. Temporary Part-time employees are not eligible for participation in any benefit program established by the City, except as required by State or Federal law or as otherwise expressly provide for in this Manual.
3279
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
49 CHAPTER 4 - LEAVE OF ABSENCE
SECTION 4.1 GENERAL INFORMATION
Generally, but not always, leaves of absences are unpaid. Employees have certain rights to substitute accrued paid leave for unpaid leave.

The City will continue to pay the City-sponsored premium portion of the employee health/medical benefits as required by law.

For more detailed information regarding the types of leave, eligibility for leave, payment for leave, and the length of leave normally authorized, see the individual descriptions of each type of leave that follows.

SECTION 4.2 VACATION
All full-time employees accrue vacation time as defined below. All regular part-time employees will accrue vacation hours at one- half (1/2) the rates below. Temporary part—time employees do not accrue vacation.

4.2.1 Amount of Vacation
a. Fifty-nine (59) or fewer months of continuous service: Each employee working in continuous service of fifty-nine (59) or fewer months shall earn 80 hours of paid vacation per year.

Vacation shall be earned on a prorated basis for time worked, and employees earn vacation leave accruals on per pay-period basis.
b. Sixty (60) to one hundred twenty (120) months of continuous service: Each employee working in continuous service for sixty (60) to one hundred nineteen (119) months shall earn 120 hours of paid vacation per year. Vacation shall be earned on a prorated basis for time worked, and employees earn vacation leave accruals on per pay-period basis. Additionally, an employee shall receive a one-time credit of forty (40) hours of vacation to their vacation leave accrual balance on the pay-period immediately following the start of their sixtieth month of continuous service.
c. One hundred twenty (120) or more months of continuous service: Each employee working in continuous service for one hundred twenty (120) months or more shall earn 160 hours of paid vacation per year. Vacation shall be earned on a prorated basis for time worked, and employees earn vacation leave accruals on per pay-period basis. Additionally, an employee shall receive a one-time credit of forty (40) hours of vacation to their vacation leave accrual balance on the pay-period immediately following the start of their one hundred twentieth (120) month of continuous service.

To attract and retain experienced at-will management employees and reflect their accruals for other comparable years of experience in a managerial at-will position, the City Manager may authorize an experienced at-will management employee to accrue paid vacation at a higher rate than what applies to other newly-hired employees at the time the at-will management employee is hired or at the time of their performance evaluation via a Personnel Action Form (PAF). However, the rate of accrual for newly- hired at-will management employees shall not exceed what is provided to employees with one hundred twenty (120) or more months of continuous service. 3280
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
50 4.2.2 Use of Vacation
a. Employees shall be eligible to use vacation as it is accrued. Employees are not eligible to advance vacation time to use vacation leave before it is accrued. b. Employees shall request use of vacation at least fourteen (14) days in advance.

Requests that are less than fourteen (14) days in advance will only be considered on a case-bycase basis, and in emergency situations. c. All requests for use of vacation must be approved by the employee’s supervisor and the relevant Department Head.
d. Upon termination of employment, employees shall be compensated for accrued unused vacation at their then current pay rate.
e. The City will not allow for accrual of vacation time in excess of 300 hours. Any and all time accrued beyond that will be paid out at the regular rate of pay. The City Manager reserves the right to allow overages in special circumstances.

4.2.3 Vacation Sell-Back
a. Employees who have been employed with the City of Eastvale for a minimum of one (1) year and have used a minimum of forty (40) hours of vacation or exempt employee leave during the pertinent calendar year, may elect to sell-back accrued, but unused, vacation hours.

An employee may request to sell-back a minimum of ten (10) hours, up to a maximum of forty (40) hours, not more than two (2) times in a calendar year. An employee may not sell-back more than eighty (80) accrued unused vacation hours in any calendar year. To sell vacation hours, an employee must have a minimum remaining balance of forty (40) hours of vacation leave accrual after the sale of said vacation hours. The employee will be compensated for such vacation sellback hours at the salary rate in effect for that employee at the time the hours are paid. b. Vacation accruals for which the employee receives compensation will be deducted from the employee’s accumulated total.
c. Any employee who has been given a disciplinary reduction in pay, disciplinary demotion, or suspension, shall be excluded from the use of this provision for sixty (60) calendar days from the date of the implementation of the disciplinary action. d. An employee desiring to sell back vacation hours under this section, must make a written request to the City Manager for approval. All vacation sell back requests will be processed in the payroll cycle following the date the request was approved whenever possible, or the following payroll cycle.
e. The City Manager reserves discretion to inactivate this provision based on the City’s financial ability to pay.
3281
City of Eastvale Personnel
Policies and Procedures
51 SECTION 4.3 SICK LEAVE

Eastvale City CouncilJune 24, 2026

Eastvale City Council
June 24, 2026