Special Program: Supervisor: Eileen Mananian
City: Escondido Restricted Use: NO
County: SAN DIEGO Senate: 40
Congres Dis: 50 Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED
State : CA Acres: 0
Latitude: 33.1002777777778 Zip:
Longitude: -117.083611111111
Address:
National Priorities List: NO
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
Confirmed Coc: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Coc: 30011
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Name: CAMP ESCONDIDO
Regulatory Agencies Involved: SMBRP
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1093
Item9.
166 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 h-Unplottable Summary
Total: 2 Unplottable sites
DB Company Name/Site
Name
Address City Zip ERIS ID
uu-CALSITES-891192570-aa BERNARDO
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
(PROPOSED)
W. OF BERNARDO AVE., N. OF
RISING HILL
ESCONDIDO CA 92029 891192570
uu-RCRA NON GEN-879456010-aa DAN TRIEGER FELICITA ROAD ESCONDIDO CA 92029 879456010 EPA Handler ID | Recycler Activity?: CAC003040318 | NO
CALSITES
RCRA NON GEN
Unplottable Summary
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1094
Item9.
167 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 h-Unplottable Report
Site: BERNARDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED)
W. OF BERNARDO AVE., N. OF RISING HILL ESCONDIDO CA 92029 uu-CALSITES-891192570-bb ID No: 37010001 Assembly:
Status Date: 01/10/2000 Senate:
NPL: N Region: 4
Tier: Region Name: LONG BEACH
Fund: County Co: 37
Access : Facility County: SAN DIEGO
Access Code: NOT REPORTED Lat Deg: 0
Cortese: Lat Min: 0
Hrscore: Lat Sec: 0
Hrsdate: Lat Dir:
Groundwater Contam: Long Deg: 0
GW Code: NOT REPORTED Long Min: 0
No Sources: 0 Long Sec: 0
RWQCB Name: Long Dir:
Branch Name: SOUTHERN CA. - A Llmethod:
Staff: JABRAHAM Lldesc:
Senior: HSALLOUM
Status Name: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM
Type Name: PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE PROPERTY
Lead Name: DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
SIC Name: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - CROPS
Filename: BERNARDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED)
Comments:
DTSC entered into a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with Escondido Union School District to provide oversight for a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment for the proposed Bernardo Elementary School site.
Background:
Site: DAN TRIEGER
FELICITA ROAD ESCONDIDO CA 92029 uu-RCRA NON GEN-879456010-bb EPA Handler ID: CAC003040318
Gen Status Universe: No Report
Contact Name: DAN TRIEGER
Contact Address: FELICITA ROAD , , ESCONDIDO , CA, 92029 , Contact Phone No and Ext: 619-850-9190
Contact Email: [email protected]
Contact Country:
County Name: SAN DIEGO
EPA Region: 09
Land Type:
Receive Date: 20191024
Location Latitude:
Location Longitude:
Recycler Activity?: NO
Recycler Activity Note: This facility has no indication of Recycling Activity.
Violation/Evaluation Summary
Note: NO RECORDS: As of Oct 2024, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID).
Handler Summary
CALSITES
RCRA NON GEN
Unplottable Report
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1095
Item9.
168 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility: No
Onsite Burner Exemption: No
Furnace Exemption: No
Underground Injection Activity: No
Commercial TSD: No
Used Oil Transporter: No
Used Oil Transfer Facility: No
Used Oil Processor: No
Used Oil Refiner: No
Used Oil Burner: No
Used Oil Market Burner: No
Used Oil Spec Marketer: No
Recycler Activity: No
Recycler Activity Without
Storage:
No
Hazardous Waste Handler Details
Sequence No: 1
Receive Date: 20191024
Handler Name: DAN TRIEGER
Source Type: Implementer
Federal Waste Generator Code: N
Generator Code Description: Not a Generator, Verified
Owner/Operator Details
Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No:
Type: Other Street 1: FELICITA ROAD
Name: DAN TRIEGER Street 2:
Date Became Current: City: ESCONDIDO
Date Ended Current: State: CA
Phone: 619-850-9190 Country:
Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92029
Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No:
Type: Other Street 1: FELICITA ROAD
Name: DAN TRIEGER Street 2:
Date Became Current: City: ESCONDIDO
Date Ended Current: State: CA
Phone: 619-850-9190 Country:
Source Type: Implementer Zip Code: 92029
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1096
Item9.
169 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions
Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information:
"Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources
Federal
National Priority List: rr-NPL-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List (NPL) includes the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program, based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. This data includes NPL sites represented as polygons, where available, that can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. As site investigation and remediation progress, OUs may be added, modified or refined. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA.
This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
National Priority List - Proposed: rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb
Sites proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state agency, or concerned citizens for addition to the National Priorities List (NPL) due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the EPA as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Sites represented as polygons, where available, can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary.
Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Deleted NPL: rr-DELETED NPL-bb
Sites deleted from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List (NPL). The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Sites represented as polygons, where available, can be sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). These site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all the Operable Units (OUs) and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
NPL
PROPOSED NPL
DELETED NPL
Appendix: Database Descriptions
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1097
Item9.
170 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: rr-SEMS-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. This data includes SEMS sites from the List 8R Active file as well as applicable sites from the EPA's Facility Registry Service map tool.
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. This data includes sites from the List 8R Archived site file.
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: rr-ODI-bb
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257).
Government Publication Date: Jun 1985
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS:
rr-CERCLIS-bb
Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA.
Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998
CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
CERCLIS Liens: rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb
A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This database was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Refer to SEMS LIEN as the current data source for Superfund Liens.
Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014
RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
SEMS
SEMS ARCHIVE
ODI
CERCLIS
IODI
CERCLIS NFRAP
CERCLIS LIENS
RCRA CORRACTS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1098
Item9.
171 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: rr-RCRA TSD-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes NonCorrective Action sites that have indicated engagement in the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which requires a RCRA hazardous waste permit.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Generator List: rr-RCRA LQG-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA SQG-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Non-Generators: rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Sites with Controls: rr-RCRA CONTROLS-bb
List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle-to-grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non-hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances.
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: rr-FED ENG-bb
List of Engineering controls (ECs) made availabe by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ECs encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. The EC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place.
Government Publication Date: Jan 29, 2025
RCRA TSD
RCRA LQG
RCRA SQG
RCRA VSQG
RCRA NON GEN
RCRA CONTROLS
FED ENG
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1099
Item9.
172 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: rr-FED INST-bb
List of Institutional controls (ICs) made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ICs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. The IC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place.
Government Publication Date: Jan 29, 2025
Land Use Control Information System: rr-LUCIS-bb
The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States.
Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006
Institutional Control Boundaries at NPL sites: rr-NPL IC-bb These boundaries of Institutional Control areas at sites on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL), or as Proposed or Deleted, are sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). The EPA's NPL includes the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments such as administrative and legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.
Government Publication Date: 1982-1986
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.
Government Publication Date: 1987-1989
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS-bb
Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2024
The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This data is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and includes Brownfield sites from the Cleanups in My Community (CIMC) web application.
Government Publication Date: Feb 7, 2024
FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: rr-FEMA UST-bb
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
FED INST
LUCIS
NPL IC
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS
FED BROWNFIELDS
FEMA UST
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1100
Item9.
173 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Facility Response Plan: rr-FRP-bb
This listing contains facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRPs) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit FRPs. Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. This listing includes FRP facilities from an applicable EPA FOIA file and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) data file.
Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024
Delisted Facility Response Plans: rr-DELISTED FRP-bb
Facilities that once appeared in - and have since been removed from - the list of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA.
Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments.
Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024
Historical Gas Stations: rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb
This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930.
Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930
Petroleum Refineries: rr-REFN-bb
This list of petroleum refineries is sourced from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Refinery Capacity Report. The listing includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year. The geographic area the report covers is the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Per the EIA, the facility location data represents the approximate location based on research of publicly available information from sources such as Federal agencies, company websites, and satellite images on public websites.
Government Publication Date: Oct 31, 2024
Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb A list of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), as well as petroleum terminals sourced from Oak Ridge National Laboratory hosted by the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Database. Data includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil with activity between 2017 and 2018. EIA petroleum product terminal data comes from the EIA815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings.
Government Publication Date: Oct 31, 2024
LIEN on Property: rr-SEMS LIEN-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides Lien details on applicable properties, such as the Superfund lien on property activity, the lien property information, and the parties associated with the lien.
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
Superfund Decision Documents: rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb
This database contains a list of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include completed Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD) for active and archived sites stored in the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
State
State Response Sites: rr-RESPONSE-bb
A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database serves a purpose similar to that of the federal NPL, functioning as a state-level counterpart for prioritizing cleanup efforts at hazardous substance release sites.
Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
FRP
DELISTED FRP
HIST GAS STATIONS
REFN
BULK TERMINAL
SEMS LIEN
SUPERFUND ROD
RESPONSE
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1101
Item9.
174 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 EnviroStor Database: rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb
The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database serves a purpose similar to that of the federal Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), functioning as a state-level counterpart for tracking potential hazardous substance release sites.
Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
Delisted State Response Sites: rr-DELISTED ENVS-bb
Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).
Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2025
Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): rr-SWF/LF-bb
The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites.
Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2024
Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels: rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit.
Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006
Waste Management Unit Database: rr-WMUD-bb
The Waste Management Unit Database System tracks and inventories waste management units. CCR Title 27 contains criteria stating that Waste Management Units are classified according to their ability to contain wastes. Containment shall be determined by geology, hydrology, topography, climatology, and other factors relating to the ability of the Unit to protect water quality. Water Code Section 13273.1 requires that operators submit a water quality solid waste assessment test (SWAT) report to address leak status. The WMUDS was last updated by the State Water Resources control board in 2000.
Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2000
EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities: rr-HWP-bb
A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database.
Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report: rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995
Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers: rr-C&D DEBRIS RECY-bb This listing of Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers is maintained by the California Intergrated Waste Management Board-common C&D materials include lumber, drywall, metals, masonry (brick, concrete, etc.), carpet, plastic, pipe, rocks, dirt, paper, cardboard, or green waste related to land development.
Government Publication Date: Jun 20, 2018
Recycling Centers: rr-RECYCLING-bb
This list of Certified Recycling Centers that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Listing of Certified Processors: rr-PROCESSORS-bb
This list of Certified Processors that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
ENVIROSTOR
DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF
SWRCB SWF
WMUD
HWP
SWAT
C&D DEBRIS RECY
RECYCLING
PROCESSORS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1102
Item9.
175 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Listing of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs: rr-CONTAINER RECY-bb This list of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs (non-buyback) operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Land Disposal Sites: rr-LDS-bb
Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports: rr-LUST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED LST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures.
Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2025
Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker: rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Nov 17, 2024
Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases: rr-UST CLOSURE-bb This listing includes Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases which are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board at a Future Board Meeting or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period, and Closure of UST Cases with Closure Denials and Approved Orders. The lists are provided by the California Water Boards.
Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2025
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database: rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker.
Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System: rr-UST SWEEPS-bb The Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS) is a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 1994
Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST-bb
A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM.
Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009
SWRCB Historical Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST SWRCB-bb A list of aboveground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Effective January 1, 2008, the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs) are vested with the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA).
Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2007
CONTAINER RECY
LDS
LUST
DELISTED LST
UST
UST CLOSURE
HHSS
UST SWEEPS
AST
AST SWRCB
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1103
Item9.
176 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Oil and Gas Facility Tanks: rr-TANK OIL GAS-bb
Locations of oil and gas tanks that fall under the jurisdiction of the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (CalGEM) (CCR 1760). CalGEM was formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR).
Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2025
Delisted Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED TNK-bb
This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM).
Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2025
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-CERS TANK-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.
Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-DELISTED CTNK-bb This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal.
Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary: rr-HIST TANK-bb The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated.
Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions: rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions.
Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
CALSITES Database: rr-CALSITES-bb
This historical database was maintained by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for more than a decade. CALSITES contains information on Brownfield properties with confirmed or potential hazardous contamination. In 2006, DTSC introduced EnviroStor as the latest Brownfields site database.
Government Publication Date: May 1, 2004
Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions: rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.
Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2021
Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions: rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials.
Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
Voluntary Cleanup Program: rr-VCP-bb
List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services.
TANK OIL GAS
DELISTED TNK
CERS TANK
DELISTED CTNK
HIST TANK
LUR
CALSITES
HLUR
DEED
VCP
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1104
Item9.
177 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
GeoTracker Cleanup Program Sites: rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb
A list of Cleanup Program sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Delisted Cleanup Program Sites: rr-DELISTED CLEANUP-bb
A list of Cleanup Program sites which were once included - and have since been removed from - the list of Cleanup Program Sites in GeoTracker.
GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
Delisted County Records: rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb
Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds.
Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Tribal
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN LUST-bb This list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN UST-bb This list of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian LUST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-bb Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian UST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
County
San Diego County - Solid Waste Facility List: rr-SWF SANDIEGO-bb This list of open and closed Solid Waste Facilities is made available by the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health and Quality's (DEHQ) agency files and map service. The County of San Diego DEHQ Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) is certified by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to enforce state solid waste laws and regulations in San Diego County, excluding the City of San Diego.
Government Publication Date: Sep 24, 2024
San Diego County - Local Oversight Program List: rr-LOP SANDIEGO-bb A list of Underground Storage Tank (UST) release sites in the County of San Diego. This list is made available by San Diego County Department of Environmental Health.
Government Publication Date: Jun 15, 2020
CLEANUP SITES
DELISTED CLEANUP
DELISTED COUNTY
INDIAN LUST
INDIAN UST
DELISTED INDIAN LST
DELISTED INDIAN UST
SWF SANDIEGO
LOP SANDIEGO
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1105
Item9.
178 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 San Diego County - Hazardous Materials Management Division Database: rr-HAZ SANDIEGO-bb A list of facilities with Unified Program Facility Permit in San Diego County. This list has been made available by County of San Diego Environmental Health.
Government Publication Date: Jul 19, 2024
San Diego County - UST List: rr-UST SANDIEGO-bb
A list of registered Underground Storage Tanks in the County of San Diego. The list is made available by the San Diego County Hazardous Materials Division.
Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2024
San Diego County - Site Assessment and Mitigation Investigation Sites: rr-SAM SANDIEGO-bb List of sites which have undergone a Site Assessment and Mitigation investigation. This list is made available by the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health.
Government Publication Date: Apr 26, 2024
Additional Environmental Record Sources
Federal
PFAS Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data: rr-PFAS GHG-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) collects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) data from large emitting facilities (25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year), and suppliers of fossil fuels and industrial gases that results in GHG emissions when used. Includes GHG emissions data for facilities that emit or have emitted since 2010 chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures by DSSTox. PFAS emissions data has been identified for facilities engaged in the following industrial processes: Aluminum Production (GHGRP Subpart F), HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 Destruction (Subpart O), Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I), Fluorinated Gas Production (Subpart L), Magnesium Production (Subpart T), Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use (Subpart DD), and Manufacture of Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment (Subpart SS). Over time, other industrial processes with required GHGRP reporting may include PFAS emissions data and the list of reportable gases may change over time.
Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2024
On-Scene Coordinator Response Sites: rr-OSC RESPONSE-bb This list of On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) Response Sites is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OSCs are the federal officials responsible for monitoring or directing responses to all oil spills and hazardous substance releases reported to the federal government. OSCs coordinate all federal efforts with, and provide support and information to local, state, and regional response communities. An OSC is an agent of either EPA or the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), depending on where the incident occurs. EPA's OSCs have primary responsibility for spills and releases to inland areas and waters. USCG OSCs have responsibility for coastal waters and the Great Lakes. In general, an OSC has the following key responsibilities during and after a response: Assessment, Monitoring, Response Assistance, and Evaluation.
Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2024
Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Aug 1, 2024
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: rr-TRIS-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of toxic chemicals from U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. There are currently 770 individually listed chemicals and 33 chemical categories covered by the TRI Program. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in amounts above established levels must submit annual reporting forms for each chemical. Note that the TRI chemical list does not include all toxic chemicals used in the U.S. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. This database includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022.
Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023
HAZ SANDIEGO
UST SANDIEGO
SAM SANDIEGO
PFAS GHG
OSC RESPONSE
FINDS/FRS
TRIS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1106
Item9.
179 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: rr-PFAS NPL-bb
This list of Superfund Sites with Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) detections is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data, previously the list was obtained by EPA FOIA requests. EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List (NPL) sites do not mean that people are at risk from PFAS, are exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS. The information in the Superfund NPL and Superfund Alternative Agreement (SAA) PFAS detection site list is years old and may not be accurate today. Site information such as site name, site ID, and location has been confirmed for accuracy; however, PFAS-related information such as media sampled, drinking water being above the health advisory, or mitigation efforts has not been verified. For Federal Facilities data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their data and provided them to EPA.
Government Publication Date: Dec 17, 2024
Federal Agency Locations with Known or Suspected PFAS Detections: rr-PFAS FED SITES-bb This list of federal agency locations with known or suspected detections of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) is made available by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools data. The EPA outlines that these data are gathered from several federal entities, such as the federal Superfund program, Department of Defense (DOD), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Transportation (DOT), and Department of Energy (DOE). The dates this data was extracted for the PFAS Analytic Tools range from 2022 to 2024. Sites on this list do not necessarily reflect the source/s of PFAS contamination and detections do not indicate level of risk or human exposure at the site.
Agricultural notifications in this data are limited to DOD sites only. At this time, the EPA is aware that this list is not comprehensive of all Federal agencies.
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites: rr-PFAS SSEHRI-bb
This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the PFAS Project Lab, part of the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents. Locations for the Known PFAS Contamination Sites are sourced from the PFAS Sites and Community Resources Map by the PFAS-REACH team, credited to PFAS Project Lab, Silent Spring Institute, and PFAS Exchange. Disclaimer: The source conveys the data undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Access the following source link for the most current information:
https://pfasproject.com/pfas-sites-and-community-resources/ Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2024
National Response Center PFAS Spills: rr-PFAS ERNS-bb
This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Spills dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The National Response Center (NRC), operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, is the designated federal point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, and other discharges into the environment, for the United States and its territories. This dataset contains NRC spill information from 1990 to the present that is restricted to records associated with PFAS and PFAS-containing materials. Incidents are filtered to include only records with a "Material Involved" or "Incident Description" related to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). The keywords used to filter the data included "AFFF," "Fire Fighting Foam," "Aqueous Film Forming Foam," "Fire Suppressant Foam, "PFAS," "PERFL," "PFOA," "PFOS," and "Genx." Limitations: The data from the NRC website contains initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS spills/release incidents.
Government Publication Date: Dec 9, 2024
PFAS NPDES Discharge Monitoring: rr-PFAS NPDES-bb
This list of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities with required monitoring for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Substances is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s PFAS Analytic Tools. Any point-source wastewater discharger to waters of the United States must have a NPDES permit, which defines a set of parameters for pollutants and monitoring to ensure that the discharge does not degrade water quality or impair human health. This list includes NPDES permitted facilities associated with permits that monitor for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), limited to the years 2007 - present. EPA further advises the following regarding these data: currently, fewer than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees, and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. For states that may have required monitoring, some reporting and data transfer issues may exist on a state-by-state basis.
Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2024
Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Toxic Release Inventory: rr-PFAS TRI-bb
PFAS NPL
PFAS FED SITES
PFAS SSEHRI
PFAS ERNS
PFAS NPDES
PFAS TRI
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1107
Item9.
180 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a per- or polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substance included in the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Encompasses Toxics Release Inventory records included in the EPA PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA's TRI database currently tracks information on disposal or releases of 770 individually listed toxic chemicals and 33 chemical categories from thousands of U.S. facilities and details about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. This listing includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022.
Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023
PFAS Water Quality Portal Sampling Data: rr-PFAS WATER-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Environmental Media Sampling Data is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The Water Quality Portal (WQP), as a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey, the EPA, and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council, is part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental organizations, and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. Limitations: EPA did not carry out the sampling or testing of a majority of the data in the WQP PFAS dataset. EPA can only speak to the accuracy and completeness of the data from projects like the National Aquatic Resource Surveys for which EPA is the data owner/organization. Data may exist within the file on Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and the approving agency of the QAPP, if a QAPP is entered.
Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2024
PFAS TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities: rr-PFAS TSCA-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. This list is specific only to TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities with reported per- and poly-fluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Data file is sourced from EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools TSCA dataset which includes CDR/Inventory Update Reporting data from 1998 up to 2020. Disclaimer: This data file includes production and importation data for chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox. Note that some regulations have specific chemical structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Reporting information on manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be compared between facilities, as some companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information.
Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023
PFAS Waste Transfers from RCRA e-Manifest : rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Waste Transfers dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. Every shipment of hazardous waste in the U.S. must be accompanied by a shipment manifest, which is a critical component of the cradle-to-grave tracking of wastes mandated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). According to the EPA, currently no Federal Waste Code exists for any PFAS compounds. To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: PFAS PFOA PFOS PERFL AFFF GENX GEN-X (plus the Vermont state-specific waste codes). Limitations: Amount or concentration of PFAS being transferred cannot be determined from the manifest information. Keyword searches may misidentify some manifest records that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS waste transfers.
Government Publication Date: Dec 15, 2024
PFAS Industry Sectors: rr-PFAS IND-bb
This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Industry Sectors dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA developed the dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS including: EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) records restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors; ECHO records for Fire Training Sites identified where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises; and 14 CFR Part 139 Airports compiled from historic and current records from the FAA Airport Data and Information Portal. Since July 2006, all certificated Part 139 Airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet certain military specifications, which to date have been fluorinated (Aqueous Film Forming Foam). Limitations: Inclusion in this dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufactured, processed, used, or released by the facility. Listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based on their industrial profile, but are unconfirmed by the EPA. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites may misidentify some facilities and should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of fire training facilities in the U.S.
Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2024
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: rr-HMIRS-bb The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) database contains unintentional hazardous materials release information reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Government Publication Date: May 29, 2024
National Clandestine Drug Labs: rr-NCDL-bb
PFAS WATER
PFAS TSCA
PFAS E-MANIFEST
PFAS IND
HMIRS
NCDL
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1108
Item9.
181 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department"), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy.
Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2023
Toxic Substances Control Act: rr-TSCA-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). EPA CDR collections occur approximately every four years and reporting requirements change per collection.
Government Publication Date: May 12, 2022
Hist TSCA: rr-HIST TSCA-bb
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.
The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006
FTTS Administrative Case Listing: rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb
An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.
Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
FTTS Inspection Case Listing: rr-FTTS INSP-bb
An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.
Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
Potentially Responsible Parties List: rr-PRP-bb
Early in the site cleanup process, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site.
This listing contains PRPs, Noticed Parties, at sites in the EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS).
Government Publication Date: Nov 20, 2024
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Since 2017, the SCRD no longer maintains this data, refer to applicable state source data where available.
Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database contains integrated enforcement and compliance information across most of U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) programs. The vision for ICIS is to replace EPA's independent databases that contain enforcement data with a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions and a subset of the Permit Compliance System (PCS), which supports the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This information is maintained by the EPA Headquarters and at the Regional offices. A future release of ICIS will completely replace PCS and will integrate that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also has the capability to track other activities that support compliance and enforcement programs, including incident tracking, compliance assistance, and compliance monitoring.
Government Publication Date: Apr 13, 2024
TSCA
HIST TSCA
FTTS ADMIN
FTTS INSP
PRP
SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1109
Item9.
182 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Drycleaner Facilities: rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) data as made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sourced from the ECHO Exporter file. The EPA tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments.
Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024
Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb
List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment).
Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024
Formerly Used Defense Sites: rr-FUDS-bb
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. The FUDS Annual Report to Congress (ARC) is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial FUDS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) FUDS dataset which applies to the Fiscal Year 2021 FUDS Inventory.
Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023
FUDS Munitions Response Sites: rr-FUDS MRS-bb
Boundaries of Munitions Response Sites (MRS), published with the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Annual Report to Congress (ARC) by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). An MRS is a discrete location within a Munitions response area (MRA) that is known to require a munitions response. An MRA means any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or munitions constituents (MC). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial MRS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) MRS dataset.
Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023
Former Military Nike Missile Sites: rr-FORMER NIKE-bb
This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination.
Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984
PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb This list of flagged pipeline incidents is made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Accidents reported on hazardous liquid gravity lines (§195.13) and reporting-regulated-only hazardous liquid gathering lines (§195.15) and incidents reported on Type R gas gathering (§192.8(c)) are not included in the flagged incident file data.
Government Publication Date: May 6, 2024
Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): rr-MLTS-bb
A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016.
Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021
Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State.
Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010
Mines Master Index File: rr-MINES-bb
FED DRYCLEANERS
DELISTED FED DRY
FUDS
FUDS MRS
FORMER NIKE
PIPELINE INCIDENT
MLTS
HIST MLTS
MINES
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1110
Item9.
183 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 The Master Index File (MIF) is provided by the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This file, which was originally created in the 1970's, contained many Mine-IDs that were invalid. MSHA removes invalid IDs from the MIF upon discovery. MSHA applicable data includes the following: all Coal and Metal/Non-Metal mines under MSHA's jurisdiction since 1/1/1970; mine addresses for all mines in the database except for Abandoned mines prior to 1998 from MSHA's legacy system (addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself); violations that have been assessed penalties as a result of MSHA inspections beginning on 1/1/2000; and violations issued as a result of MSHA inspections conducted beginning on 1/1/2000.
Government Publication Date: Feb 5, 2024
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: rr-SMCRA-bb This inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily legacy coal mining operations) is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), as it provides information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This inventory contains information on the type and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Problems, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The data is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Disclaimer: Per the OSMRE, States and tribes who enter their data into e-AMLIS (AML Inventory System) may truncate their latitude and longitude so the precise location of usually dangerous AMLs is not revealed in an effort to protect the public from searching for these AMLs, most of which are on private property. If more precise location information is needed, please contact the applicable state/tribe of interest.
Government Publication Date: May 20, 2024
Mineral Resource Data System: rr-MRDS-bb
The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world.
Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps.
Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2016
DOE Legacy Management Sites: rr-LM SITES-bb
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) currently manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The LM manages sites with diverse regulatory drivers (statutes or programs that direct cleanup and management requirements at DOE sites) or as part of internal DOE or congressionally-recognized programs, such as but not limited to: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA Title I, Tile II), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D), Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). This site listing includes data exported from the DOE Office of LM' s Geospatial Environmental Mapping System (GEMS). GEMS Data disclaimer: The DOE Office of LM makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the use, accuracy, availability, or completeness of the data presented herein.
Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2023
Alternative Fueling Stations: rr-ALT FUELS-bb
This list of alternative fueling stations is sourced from the Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy launched the AFDC in 1991 as a repository for alternative fuel vehicle performance data, which provides a wealth of information and data on alternative and renewable fuels, advanced vehicles, fuel-saving strategies, and emerging transportation technologies. The data includes Biodiesel (B20 and above), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Electric, Ethanol (E85), Hydrogen, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Renewable Diesel (R20 and above) fuel type locations.
Government Publication Date: Aug 29, 2024
Superfunds Consent Decrees: rr-CONSENT DECREES-bb
This list of Superfund consent decrees is provided by the Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division (ENRD) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applicable file. This listing includes Cases filed since 2010 limited to the following: Consent Decrees for CERCLA or Superfund Sites filed and/or as proposed within the ENRD's Case Management System (CMS); and applicable ENRD's Environmental Defense Section (EDS) CERCLA Cases with "Consent" in History Note. CMS may not reflect the latest developments in a case, nor can the agency guarantee the accuracy of the data. ENRD Disclaimer: Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA; response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA; however, this should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist.
Government Publication Date: Jun 26, 2024
Air Facility System: rr-AFS-bb
SMCRA
MRDS
LM SITES
ALT FUELS
CONSENT DECREES
AFS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1111
Item9.
184 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 This EPA retired Air Facility System (AFS) dataset contains emissions, compliance, and enforcement data on stationary sources of air pollution.
Regulated sources cover a wide spectrum; from large industrial facilities to relatively small operations such as dry cleaners. AFS does not contain data on facilities that are solely asbestos demolition and/or renovation contractors, or landfills. ECHO Clean Air Act data from AFS are frozen and reflect data as of October 17, 2014; the EPA retired this system for Clean Air Act stationary sources and transitioned to ICIS-Air.
Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2014
Registered Pesticide Establishments: rr-SSTS-bb
This national list of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide and/or device-producing establishments is based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that each producing establishment must place its EPA establishment number on the label or immediate container of each pesticide, active ingredient or device produced. An EPA establishment number on a pesticide product label identifies the EPA registered location where the product was produced. The list of establishments is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Transformers: rr-PCBT-bb Locations of Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. PCB transformer owners must register their transformer(s) with EPA. Although not required, PCB transformer owners who have removed and properly disposed of a registered PCB transformer may notify EPA to have their PCB transformer de-registered. Data made available by EPA.
Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2019
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: rr-PCB-bb
Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number.
Government Publication Date: May 23, 2024
Power Plants: rr-POWER PLANTS-bb
This list of power plants is provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). The listing includes operable electric generating plants in the United States by energy source, originating from the EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report; EIA-860M, Monthly Update to the Annual Electric Generator Report; and EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. It includes all operable plants by energy source with a combined nameplate capacity of 1 megawatt or more that are operating, are on standby, or out of service for short- or long-term.
Government Publication Date: Apr 15, 2024
State
PFAS Sampling Locations: rr-PFAS SAMPLING-bb
This data is sourced from the State Water Board's GeoTracker Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Map tool which contains individual sampling points (i.e., soil boring, groundwater monitoring well, drinking water well for municipal drinking water systems, etc.) or a site location with PFAS analytical data. Includes analytical results that are finalized and submitted electronically by the Responsible Parties via GeoTracker's Electronic Submittal of Information Portal, and after it's accepted by a Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2024
Dry Cleaning Facilities: rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control.
Government Publication Date: Dec 20, 2021
Delisted Drycleaners: rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-bb
Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.
Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2022
Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program: rr-DRYC GRANT-bb A list of grant recipients of the Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program made available by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The program provides grants to eligible dry cleaning businesses to assist them in transitioning away from PERC machines to alternative non-toxic and non-smog forming technologies.
Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2022
SSTS
PCBT
PCB
POWER PLANTS
PFAS SAMPLING
DRYCLEANERS
DELISTED DRYCLEANERS
DRYC GRANT
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1112
Item9.
185 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 PFAS GeoTracker Cleanup Sites: rr-PFAS GT CLEANUPS-bb
A list of applicable cleanup sites from the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) GeoTracker data management system where one or more of the potential contaminants of concern are identified in the PFAS Structure List and/or PFAS Chemicals Without Explicit Structure List made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
PFOA/PFOS Groundwater: rr-PFAS GW-bb
A list of water wells from the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program (GAMA) Groundwater Information System with the groundwater chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (NL = 0.014 UG/L) or perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS) (NL = 0.013 UG/L). The GAMA Groundwater Information System search is made available by California Water Boards.
Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2024
PFAS Investigations: rr-PFAS INVEST-bb
This list of potential Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) sites is compiled from the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) PFAS Investigations Map tool. The SWRCB issued investigative orders, per California Water Code (CWC) Section 13267 and/or 13383, to these sites.
Orders were also issued to the public water systems to sample wells in the vicinity of these locations. Military facilities have been identified by the Department of Defense (DOD) as part of their efforts to investigate PFAS per the Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The data includes locations for Airports, Chrome Plating Facilities, Landfills, Publicly Owned Treatment Works, Refineries and Bulk Terminals, DOD Facilities, and Monitored Drinking Water Wells being investigated for potential PFAS.
Government Publication Date: Jan 23, 2024
Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup: rr-HWSS CLEANUP-bb The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control.
Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2023
Toxic Pit Cleanup Act Sites: rr-TOXIC PITS-bb
The Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA) list identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. This list was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), is not longer maintained, and updates are not planned.
Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1995
List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action: rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment.
Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016
EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement: rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control's (DTSC) EnviroStor data management system.
Government Publication Date: Nov 23, 2023
School Property Evaluation Program Sites: rr-SCH-bb
A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school.
Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This listing has been made available by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES).
Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
PFAS GT CLEANUPS
PFAS GW
PFAS INVEST
HWSS CLEANUP
TOXIC PITS
DTSC HWF
INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1113
Item9.
186 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).
Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993
Handlers from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZNET-bb A list of handlers not otherwise classified as Treatment, Storage, Disposal facilities (TSDF) or generators from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).
Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016
Generators from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZ GEN-bb List of handlers listed as having generated waste from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
TSDF from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZ TSD-bb
List of Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992
DTSC Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters: rr-HW TRANSPORT-bb The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains this list of Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters.
Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Registered Waste Tire Haulers: rr-WASTE TIRE-bb
This list of registered waste tire haulers is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
Government Publication Date: Feb 13, 2025
California Medical Waste Management Program Facility List: rr-MEDICAL WASTE-bb This list of Medical Waste Management Program Facilities is maintained by the California Department of Public Health. The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of medical waste by providing oversight for the implementation of the Medical Waste Management Act (MWMA). The MWMP permits and inspects all medical waste off-site treatment facilities, medical waste transporters, and medical waste transfer stations. This list contains transporters, treatment, and transfer facilities.
Government Publication Date: Sep 5, 2024
Historical Cortese List: rr-HIST CORTESE-bb
List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites.
Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008
Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders.
Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2021
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-CERS HAZ-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs:
Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.
HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET
HAZ GEN
HAZ TSD
HIST MANIFEST
HW TRANSPORT
WASTE TIRE
MEDICAL WASTE
HIST CORTESE
CDO/CAO
CERS HAZ
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1114
Item9.
187 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator.
Government Publication Date: Nov 29, 2018
Sites in GeoTracker: rr-GEOTRACKER-bb
GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. This is a list of sites in GeoTracker that aren't otherwise categorized as LUST, Land Disposal Sites (LDS), Cleanup Sites, or sites having Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). This listing includes program types such as Underground Injection Control (UIC), Confined Animal Facilities (CAF), Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, plans, and non-case information.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Mines Listing: rr-MINE-bb
This list includes mine site locations extracted from the Mines Online database, maintained by the California Department of Conservation. Mines Online (MOL) is an interactive web map designed with GIS features that provide information such as the mine name, mine status, commodity sold, location, and other mine specific data. Please note: Mine location information is provided to assist experts in determining the location of mine operators in accordance with California Civil Code section 1103.4 and reflects information reported by mine operators in annual reports provided under Public Resources Code section 2207. While the Division of Mine Reclamation (DMR) attempts to populate MOL with accurate location information, the DMR cannot guarantee the accuracy of operator reported location information.
Government Publication Date: Oct 3, 2024
Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens: rr-LIEN-bb
The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) maintains this list of liens placed upon real properties. A lien is utilized by the DTSC to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties for costs associated with the remediation of contaminated properties.
Government Publication Date: Dec 18, 2023
Waste Discharge Requirements: rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb
List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.
Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities: rr-EMISSIONS-bb
A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program.
Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2021
Clandestine Drug Lab Sites: rr-CDL-bb
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories.
Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2021
Tribal
No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.
County
DELISTED HAZ
GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN
WASTE DISCHG
EMISSIONS
CDL
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1115
Item9.
188 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 h-Definitions
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.
Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.
Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation.
Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report.
Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation.
Source: Google Elevation API.
Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections:
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property.
The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.
Definitions
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1116
Item9.
APPENDIX C
REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1117
Item9.
Request
Hello. We are seeking hazardous waste, hazardous materials, underground storage tank records and site assessment/mitigation files pertaining to the properties located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California.
Thanks.
Dan
TimelineDocuments
Anyone with access to this request
Request published
March 16, 2025, 9:35pm
Anyone with access to this request
Request closed
Hello,
This is in response to your California Public Records Act request, which the County of San Diego received on 03/11/2025 and which states:
We are seeking hazardous waste, hazardous materials, underground storage tank records and site assessment/mitigation files pertaining to the properties located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California.
The County does not have any records responsive to your request. Please note that 72 hours after you receive this message your request will become publicly available.
Thank you,
DEHQ- Hazardous Materials Division
County of San Diego
March 13, 2025, 12:02pm by StaƯ
Anyone with access to this request
Department assignment
Environmental Health and Quality - Hazardous Material Division (HMD) March 11, 2025, 2:31pm by the requester
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1118
Item9.
Anyone with access to this request
Request opened
Request received via web
March 11, 2025, 2:31pm by the requester
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1119
Item9.
APPENDIX D
HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1120
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1121
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1122
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1123
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1124
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1125
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1126
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1127
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1128
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1129
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1130
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1131
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1132
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1133
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1134
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1135
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1136
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1137
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1138
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1139
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1140
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1141
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1142
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1143
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1144
Item9.
Project Property:
Project No:
Requested By:
Order No:
Date Completed:
1100 Hamilton Lane
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido CA 92029
None
Weis Environmental, LLC
25030401545
March 05, 2025
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1145
Item9.
Topographic Map Symbology for the maps may be available in the following documents:
Pre-1947
1947-2009
2009-present
Topographic Maps included in this report are produced by the USGS and are to be used for research purposes including a phase I report.
Maps are not to be resold as commercial property.
No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.(in the US) and ERIS Information Limited Partnership (in Canada), both doing business as 'ERIS', using Topographic Maps produced by the USGS.
This maps contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein.
Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.
Topographic Map Symbols
US Topo Map Symbols
We have searched USGS collections of current topographic maps and historical topographic maps for the project property. Below is a list of maps found for the project property and adjacent area. Maps are from 7.5 and 15 minute topographic map series, if available.
Year Map Series
2022 7.5
2018 7.5
2015 7.5
1996 7.5
1975 7.5
1968 7.5
1949 7.5
1948 7.5
1942 15
1901 15
1893 15
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1146
Item9.
2022
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1147
Item9.
2018
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1148
Item9.
2015
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1149
Item9.
(1-1996) 1996 Aerial Photo Year: 1996
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1996)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1150
Item9.
(1-1975)
Aerial Photo Year: 1967
Photo Revision Year: 1975 1975
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1975)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1151
Item9.
(1-1968) 1968 Aerial Photo Year: 1967
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1968)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1152
Item9.
(1-1949) 1949 Aerial Photo Year: 1947
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1949)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1153
Item9.
(1-1948) 1948 Aerial Photo Year: 1947
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1948)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1154
Item9.
(1-1942) 1942 Aerial Photo Year: 1939
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1942)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1155
Item9.
1901
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1156
Item9.
1893
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):
Escondido
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1157
Item9.
APPENDIX E
PHOTOGRAPHS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1158
Item9.
Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California
1. View from the northwest corner of the Site
facing south.
2. View from the northwest corner of the Site
facing east.
3. View from the southwest corner of the Site
facing northeast.
4. View from the southeast corner of the Site
facing northwest.
5. View from the southwest corner of the Site
facing north.
6. View from the northeast corner of the Site
facing southwest.
Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1159
Item9.
Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California
7. View from the center of the Site facing north. 8. View from the center of the Site facing east. 9. View from the center of the Site facing south.
10. View from the center of the Site facing west. 11. View of rock outcrops and vegetation piles in the center of the Site.
12. View of scrap metal debris in the center of the
Site.
Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1160
Item9.
Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California
13. View of pole-mounted transformer along the
east side of the Site.
14. View of the east adjoining residential
property.
15. View of the south adjoining residential
property.
16. View of Bernardo Avenue, then the west
adjoining residential property.
17. View of Hamilton Lane, then the north
adjoining residential property.
Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1161
Item9.
APPENDIX F
INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1162
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1163
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1164
Item9.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1165
Item9.
APPENDIX G
QUALIFICATIONS
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1166
Item9.
Resume of Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.
Professional Summary
Environmental Manager and California Registered Environmental Health Specialist with extensive expertise in environmental science and assessment, environmental and public health, risk assessment, health and safety, remedial design and implementation, strategic planning and project/program design and implementation. Over 20 years of professional experience and achievement.
Successful completion of projects for a wide range of clientele including, but not limited to, local government entities, developers (affordable housing and market rate), educational institutions, Federal government entities, law firms, architectural and engineering firms, lending institutions, life insurance companies, conservancies, commercial/industrial real estate owners/managers, insurance companies, wireless telecommunication carriers and real estate developers. Extensive experienced in the completion of assessment, construction and remediation quality assurance during the completion of urban redevelopment/brownfields projects and public works projects, many of which have been located in downtown areas of San Diego, Los Angeles, Oakland, San Francisco, and other urban communities throughout the State of California. Proven ability to train and mentor professional, technical and support staff. Manages a comprehensive health and safety program. Holds a Master of Science in Public Health with an emphasis in environmental health science, risk assessment, health and safety, toxicology and environmental policy. Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 in the State of California.
Education and Professional Certification
භ University of Delaware, Bachelor of Arts, 1995
භ San Diego State University, Master of Science, Public/Environmental Health, 2001 භ State of California Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 භ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services - Environmental Health Training in Emergency Response භ Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard (HAZWOPER) Training and Annual 8 Hour HAZWOPER Refresher Training භ OSHA 8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training
Relevant Skills and Qualifications
භ Proven ability to manage staff and programs/projects in challenging and diverse environments and regulatory settings.
Consistently meets project schedules, goals, deadlines and budgetary restrictions. භ Completed or managed over 3,000 due diligence related environmental assessments and completed or managed over 500 subsurface environmental investigations of soil gas, soil, groundwater and other media. Investigations have included human health and ecological risk assessments, evaluations of indoor air conditions based on interpretations of subsurface conditions, underground storage tank (UST) evaluation/closure and hazardous waste characterization/management.
Subsurface activities performed include the completion of soil borings using various drilling technologies, soil and groundwater sampling, installation and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, free product evaluations, exploratory trenching and real-time delineation using mobile analytical laboratories and other soil screening technology. භ Managed over 100 remediation or construction management related projects primarily related to source removal of subsurface contaminants, including but not limited to, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, organochlorine pesticides and other agricultural related chemicals, dioxins and furans and polychlorinated biphenyls. Has also assisted in cost recovery efforts from private parties and State/Federal funding programs for environmental assessment and remediation work and has served as an expert witness during legal proceedings pertaining to environmental related claims.
භ Strong collaboration and negotiation skills with environmental regulatory agencies regarding project planning, initiation, status, approvals and implementation. Direct experience in interfacing with members of regulatory agencies including but not limited to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 585-7070 // (760) 672-6338 //
[email protected] // à www.weisenviro.com
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1167
Item9.
Resume of Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.
Control and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, County of San Diego Departments of Environmental Health (DEH), Public Works and Planning and Land Use, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Riverside County DEH, San Francisco City and County Department of Public Health (DPH), Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, County of Los Angeles County DPH and other local Certified Unified Program Agencies. Develop, manage and implement compliance and best practices efforts with Federal and State laws and regulations.
භ Conducted and/or managed hundreds of public/environmental health related assessments including electromagnetic field surveys, radionuclide surveys, indoor air quality investigations, radon surveys, drinking water assessments, asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint surveys and mold/microbial evaluations. භ Recovered over $10,000,000 of assessment and cleanup costs for clientele from various sources including State of California Cleanup Funds, United States Environmental Protection Agency Brownfield grants and private parties including major oil companies.
භ Responsible for facilitating a safe and healthy work environment in concert with the mission of the company while ensuring compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local regulations. භ Published technical papers pertaining to geogenic concentrations of metals in San Diego County, radioactive dating and pollutant chronologies in estuarine sediments and various urban runoff related implications. භ Delivered presentations pertaining to various environmental topics including human health risk assessment to membership at local and national trade conferences
Project Experience
භ 14th and Island, San Diego, California – Development of Site Mitigation Plan, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities at the superblock construction site in downtown San Diego and achievement of regulatory closure with the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health. භ 2198 Market Street, San Francisco, California – Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, supplemental subsurface investigation, Site Mitigation Plan development, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure with the City of San Francisco Department of Public Health.
භ Former EZ Serve, 9305 Mission Gorge Road, Santee, California – Closure report preparation and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board interface and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure under State of California lowthreat policy. භ French Field – Former Vista Burn Dump, Oceanside, California – Oversight of the capping of a former burn dump/landfill facility and restoration for public use as a sports facility. Negotiation and achievement of regulatory closure with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control with concurrence from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and the County of San Diego Local Enforcement Agency. භ Indoor Skydiving Facility, 1401 Imperial Avenue, San Diego, California – Development of Soil Management Plan and contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities in downtown San Diego. භ Lemon Grove Avenue Realignment Project, Lemon Grove, California – Development of Impacted Soil Management Plan, Community Health and Safety Plan and Worker Health and Safety Plan and oversight of the implementation of such plans during construction activities.
භ North Side Interior Road and Utilities Project at San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California - Subsurface assessment, development of Soil Management Plan and Work Health and Safety Plan and implementation and monitoring of soil management strategies.
භ Olympic and Hill, Los Angeles, California – Removal of multiple underground storage tanks and underlying contaminated soil and achievement of regulatory closure with the City of Los Angeles Fire Department. භ San Ysidro - U.S. Land Port of Entry, San Diego, California – Subsurface assessment and development and implementation of soil management strategies.
භ VA Medical Center Long Beach, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, California - VA Long Beach: Seismic Corrections – Mental Health, Community Living Center and Chiller Replacements Project – Asbestos containing materials and leadbased paint surveys and preparation of abatement contractor bid specifications.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1168
Item9.
Appendix G – Scoping Agreement for
Transportation Studies
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1169
Item9.
APPENDIX A A
Scoping Agreement for Transportation Studies
PART 1
General Project Information and Description
Project Information
Project Name: Hamilton Ln 5-Lot TSM
Project Location: SE Corner of Bernardo Ave & Hamilton Ln Project Description
Land Uses and Intensities: 5 SFR with 5 ADU on 5-lots
Gross and Developable Acreage: 6.2 ac / 5 ac
Building Square Footage or Number of Dwelling Units:
Vehicle Parking Spaces: 15
Bicycle Parking Spaces: 0
Motorcycle Spaces: 0
Electric Vehicle Spaces:0
Project Applicant:
Name: Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Address: PO Box 1795, La Jolla, CA 92038
Telephone and Email: 858-699-9311 / [email protected] Consultant
Firm: Mizuta Traffic Consulting
Project Manager: Marc Mizuta, PE, TE, PTOE
Address: 5694 Mission Center Rd #602-121, San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone and Email: 858-752-8212 / [email protected] Project Trip Generation
Source: SANDAG Pass-by Trips: n/a
Total Daily Trips*: 80 Diverted Trips: n/a
Internal Capture Rate: 0 Trip Credit: 0
Alternative Modes: n/a Net New Daily Trips: 80
*If truck traffic accounts for 25% or more of project trips, then a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factor of 2.5 should be applied to all truck trips.
General Plan Consistency
Is this project consistent with the General Plan? 5Yes 侊 No Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1170
Item9.
Site Plan
Attach 11x17 copies of the project location/vicinity map and site plan containing the following:
x Driveway locations and access type
x Pedestrian access, bicycle access, and on-site pedestrian circulation x Location and distance to nearest existing transit stop (measure as walking distance to project entrance or middle of parcel)
x Location of planned or proposed pedestrian or bicycle improvements within ¼ mile of the project identified in the General Plan Mobility and Infrastructure Element or the Bicycle Master Plan CEQA Transportation Analysis Screening
Project Type Screening Criteria for CEQA Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Analysis 1) Select the Land Uses that apply to your project
2) Answer the questions for each Land Use that applies to yourproject (if “Yes” in any land use category below then that land use (or a portion of the land use) is screened from CEQA VMT Analysis; If a project is screened out, a technical memorandum is still required to document the screening process) Screened
Out
Not
Screened
Out
Yes No
5 1. Small Residential and Employment Projects:
a. Does the project result in 200 daily trips or less? 5 ܆ ܆ 2. Project is Located in a Transit-Accessible Area:
a. Is the project located within a half-mile walking distance of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor? ܆ ܆
b. Additional project features:
i. Does the SURMHFWKDYHD)ORRU$UHD5DWLR 0.75? ܆ ܆ ii. Does project include the least amount of parkingrequired for residents, customers, or employees (i.e. not more than required)? ܆ ܆
iii. Is the project consistent with SANDAG’s most recent Sustainable Communities Strategy or the City of Escondido GeneralPlan? ܆ ܆
iv. Does the project replace affordable residential units with a greater number of moderate- or high-income residentialunits?
܆ ܆
v. Does the project have basic walking and biking accessto transit (e.g., sidewalks connecting to transit stops)?
܆ ܆
܆ 3. Project is in a VMT-Efficient Area:
a. Is the project in a VMT/Capita or VMT/Employee Efficient Area per SANDAG screening maps?
܆܆
܆ 4. Locally-Serving Retail Project:
a. Is the project less than 50,000 square feet and expected to draw at least 75% of customers from the local area?
܆ ܆
܆ 5. Locally Serving Public Facility:
a. Is the project a locally serving public facility? ܆܆ ܆ 6. Redevelopment Project:
a. Does the project result in a net decrease in total Project VMT than the existing use? ܆ ܆
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1171
Item9.
Non-CEQA Local Mobility Analysis
Local Mobility Analysis (LMA) Requirement
1) Select the Street Classifications for each street in the studyarea 2) Answer the questions for each Street Classification that applies to your project Yes No ܆ 1. Prime Arterial:
a. Does the project add 900 ADT or more to any segment classified as 8-lane Prime Arterial?
܆܆
b. Does the project add 800 ADT or more to any segment classified as 6-lane Prime Arterial?
܆܆
܆ 2. Major Road:
a. Does the project add 700 ADT or more to any segment classified as 6-lane Major Road?
܆ ܆
b. Does the project add 500 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Major Road?
܆ ܆
܆ 3. Collector:
a. Does the project add 500 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Collector without parking?
܆܆
b. Does the project add 250 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Collector with parking?
܆܆
5 4. Local Collector and other:
a. Does the project add 200 ADT or more to any segment classified as 2-lane Local Collector or any other classifications?
5 ܆
Certain types of projects which generate less than 500 ADT may be considered by the City staff for an LMA waiver only where the affected segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better.
Please briefly explain why your project might be eligible for an LMA waiver.
PART 2 (n/a)
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment
ڧSelect Zone (Model Series ) Projects that generate greater than 2,400 daily trips ڧManual Estimation Projects that generate less than 2,400 daily trips Provide an exhibit detailing the project’s trip distribution and trip assignment.
Provide a table with the project’s daily trip assignment for each street segment in the study area.
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1172
Item9.
Study Intersections and Roadway Segments (NOTE: Subject to change based of staff review)
1. 6.
2. 7.
3. 8.
4. 9.
5. 10.
Attach a separate page if the number of study locations exceeds 10.
Other Jurisdictions
Is this project located within one mile of another Local Jurisdiction? ܆ Yes 5No If yes, name of Jurisdiction:
Specific Issues to be addressed within the Study
(in addition to requirements described in the Guidelines – to be filled out by City Staff)
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Recommended by:
Consultant’s Representative Date
Scoping Agreement Submitted on
Date
Scoping Agreement Re-submitted on
Date
Approved Scoping Agreement:
City of Escondido Date
Transportation Specialist
C lt t’
ecommended by:
R tt
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1173
Item9.
PREPARED BY:
M A S S O N
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:OWNER/APPLICANT:
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1174
Item9.
% ADT % ADT
Single Family Detached 10 trips / du 8% 0.30 : 0.70 10% 0.70 : 0.30 Apartment 6 trips / du 8% 0.20 : 0.80 9% 0.70 : 0.30
In Out In Out
Single Family Detached 5 50 2 2 4 1
ADU 5 30 1 2 3 0
80 3 4 7 1
Notes:
TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
Land Use Amount ADT
AM PEAK PM PEAK
Total Total
TRIP GENERATION RATES1
Land Use Weekday Daily
AM PEAK PM PEAK
In:Out Ratio In:Out Ratio
1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. du: dwelling unit
TOTAL 78
du 3 3
Proposed Use
du 4 5
Attachment
Exhibit C
"5"
1175
Item9.
Bicycle Network
LEGEND
Project Site 0.25-mile radius
Source: City of Escondido Bicycle Master Plan, Figure ES 1 Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1176
Item9.
Circulation Element
LEGEND
Project Site
Exhibit C
Attachment "5"
1177
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1178
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1179
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1180
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1181
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1182
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1183
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1184
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1185
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1186
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1187
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1188
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1189
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1190
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1191
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1192
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1193
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1194
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1195
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1196
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1197
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1198
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1199
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1200
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1201
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1202
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1203
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1204
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1205
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1206
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1207
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1208
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1209
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1210
Item9.
Attachment "6"
1211
Item9.
Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results June 5, 2026 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760) 585-7070
www.weisenviro.com
June 5, 2026
Lee Duran
Hamilton Bernardo LLC
PO Box 1795
La Jolla, CA 92038
Subject: Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results 1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
Dear Mr. Duran:
Weis Environmental, LLC has conducted soil and soil gas sampling and analysis at the property at located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California (Site). A Vicinity Map is included as Figure
1. Location and legal description information is presented in the table below.
Location/Legal Consideration Details
Legal Physical Address 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California.
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) San Diego County APN 238-360-68-00.
Property Size 6.28 acres.
General Orientation Relative to
Roadways or Other Landmarks
Generally north of Park Drive, south of Hamilton Lane, east of Bernardo Avenue and west of Our Country Road.
We previously completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the Site in April 2025. No recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site were identified and additional assessment was not considered to be warranted.
It is our understanding that you intend to subdivide the Site in to multiple residential lots. As part of this process, an inquiry from the City was reportedly received regarding potential environmental impacts to the Site resulting from the former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard facility located nearby to the north-northwest at 2257 Bernardo Avenue. While no apparent impacts from this off-Site property are anticipated to have occurred, soil and soil gas sampling and analysis has been conducted in an abundance of caution.
Methodology
We prepared a health and safety plan that outlined the procedures that our personnel and subcontractors followed to minimize the potential for health and safety hazards during the course of work performed at the Site.
Attachment "7"
1212
Item9.
Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results June 5, 2026 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California
Soil Sampling and Analysis
Four soil sampling locations were selected at the Site (see attached Site Plan – Figure 2) identified as S1 through S4. Representative soil samples were collected from relatively shallow depths (upper two feet) at these locations using a stainless steel hand auger. The hand auger was decontaminated between uses by washing with a non-phosphate detergent/tap water solution followed by a triple rinse of distilled/deionized water. Disposable field equipment was placed into plastic trash bags for proper disposal. All persons collecting samples wore clean nitrile gloves and limited contact with the samples.
Gloves were changed between samples. Sample containers were prepared by the analytical laboratory and sealed to ensure cleanliness and eventual sample integrity.
Soil samples were collected in laboratory prepared glass jars. The lids of the containers were not removed at any time prior to sample collection and were tightly closed after sample collection. Sample labels were firmly attached to the containers with appropriate information printed on the labels. Once the sample containers were filled, they were placed immediately in coolers on ice to maintain the samples at 4o
C +/- 2oC. The samples were then logged on to an appropriate chain of custody. The samples were then packaged for transport to their respective analytical laboratories with chain-ofcustody forms placed inside of the shipping container/cooler. The samples were packaged so that they would not leak or spill from the containers.
The four soil samples were analyzed by for Title 22 Metals by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test Methods 6010B and 7471, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA test Method 8260B and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA test Method 8082.
Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis
Immediately adjacent to each soil sampling location, soil gas samples were collected at depths of approximately five feet and identified as SG1 through SG4 (see attached Site Plan – Figure 2).
Manually driven holes for soil gas probe installation were advanced to depths of approximately five feet using a slide or electric rotary hammer and two-inch diameter stainless steel rods. Soil gas probe installation was conducted by Baseline Analytical of Huntington Beach, California. Polyethylene tubing (1/4-inch diameter) equipped with an anchor was inserted through the probe holes and extended to the target sampling depths. The probes were gently lifted up from the bottoms of the boreholes and sand was poured down the boreholes to encase the filter with one foot of sand pack. Approximately one foot of dry granular bentonite was then placed on top of the sand pack. The soil gas well was then completed to the surface with hydrated bentonite.
The probes were allowed to set for at least two hours prior to purging and sampling to allow the bentonite time to properly seal. After two hours following the installation of each probe, Baseline purged the probes. Purge volumes of the soil gas probes were calculated. A total of three volumes of air were purged from each probe. Prior to purging and sampling, a shut-in test was conducted on the sampling train to check for leaks in the above-ground fittings. The shut-in test was conducted by attaching the complete sample train assembly to the termination valve on the probe. With the valve attached to the probe in the “off” position, the vacuum pump was used to evacuate the sample train of air to a minimum measured vacuum of approximately 100 inches of water. The vacuum was observed on a vacuum gauge that was part of the vacuum pump assembly. The vacuum gauge was observed for one minute and all above ground connections were considered “air-tight” if the pressure on the gauge did not noticeably dissipate. If there was an observable loss in vacuum, the fittings in the sample Attachment "7"
1213
Item9.
Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results June 5, 2026 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California
Antimony, cadmium, selenium and silver were not detected at or above the laboratory method detection limits.
Arsenic was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 2.4 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The detections are below the State of California Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) of 500 mg/kg. The detections of this element were not compared to published Region 2 Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) or EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) as these lookup values are set at concentrations below what is typically naturally occurring for this element in southern California soils. The arsenic detections reported are well within what can be expected to be naturally occurring and therefore such detections do not represent an adverse risk to human health for a residential land use scenario.
Barium was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 120 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 10,000 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 15,000 mg/kg.
Beryllium was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 0.25 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 75 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 16 mg/kg and 160 mg/kg, respectively.
Chromium was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 33 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 2,500 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 120,000 mg/kg and 85,000 mg/kg, respectively.
assembly were checked and tightened, and the test repeated. Sampling did not commence until the above ground fittings were deemed airtight.
Following purging, Baseline collected soil gas samples from the probes in to evacuated SummaTM canisters which were connected to the tubing exiting the surface of the ground. During the purging and sampling, a leak check compound (isopropyl alcohol) was also introduced to the areas around the probes. This compound was not detected by the analytical laboratory indicating that there were no upset conditions relative to the construction of the soil gas probes. All soil gas samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA test Method TO-15 by Baseline. After the samples were collected, the probes were removed from the boreholes. All sampling locations were backfilled and capped with concrete.
Results
Analytical data is summarized below. The analytical laboratory reports and chains of custody are also attached.
Soil
Title 22 Metals
Thirteen (13) of the 17 Title 22 Metals were detected at or above analytical laboratory method detection limits in one or more of the soil samples obtained during the sampling effort. A summary of the metals results is provided below.
Attachment "7"
1214
Item9.
Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results June 5, 2026 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California
Cobalt was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 10 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 8,000 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 23 mg/kg. Copper was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 19 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 2,500 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 3,100 mg/kg. Lead was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 2.7 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 1,000 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 80 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, respectively.
Mercury was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 0.0065 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 20 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 0.67 mg/kg and 7.1 mg/kg, respectively.
Molybdenum was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 0.25 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 3,500 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 390 mg/kg.
Nickel was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 12 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 2,000 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 820 mg/kg. Thallium was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 0.77 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 700 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 0.78 mg/kg.
Vanadium was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 71 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 2,400 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 390 mg/kg.
Zinc was detected in the samples at a maximum concentration of 29 mg/kg. The detections are below the TTLC of 5,000 mg/kg and the ESL and RSL for residential soil of 23,000 mg/kg.
VOCs
VOCs were not detected at or above the laboratory method reporting limits.
PCBs
PCBs were not detected at or above the laboratory method reporting limits.
Soil Gas
VOCs were not detected at or above the laboratory method reporting limits.
Attachment "7"
1215
Item9.
Soil and Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis Results June 5, 2026 1100 Hamilton Lane, Escondido, California
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions of the sampling and analysis are as follows:
No soil impacts were identified during this assessment. VOCs were not detected in soil gas samples obtained at the Site. This would indicate that vapor intrusion is not a human exposure pathway of concern at the Site. Additional assessment at the Site is not warranted.
Limitations
The services provided by our firm have been performed in accordance with practices and standards generally accepted by environmental scientists practicing in this industry. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The results and conclusions described herein do not purport to identify any and all sources or locations of potentially impacted media that may exist at the Site. Levels of contaminants measured at a given location may not be representative of conditions in other areas on the Site. In addition, conditions may change at any particular location as a function of time in response to natural conditions, chemical reactions, and other factors. Our conclusions regarding the condition of the Site does not represent a warranty that all areas of the Site are similar to those sampled. We are not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on this information.
Closure
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact us at 760.585.7070.
Sincerely,
Daniel Weis, R.E.H.S. Eric M. Cathcart, MS, PG
Environmental Manager Senior Geologist
California Professional Geologist #7548
Attachments
Attachment "7"
1216
Item9.
Prepared by:
Weis Environmental
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SITE
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
Attachment "7"
1217
Item9.
Prepared by:
Weis Environmental
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Figure 2 - Site Plan
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
SITE
Vacant Land
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Vacant Land
S1/SG1
S2/SG2
S3/SG3
S4/SG4
Attachment "7"
1218
Item9.
June 02, 2026
Weis Environmental, LLC
Dan Weis
Attention: Dan Weis
RE: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
FAX: Workorder No.: N084195
TEL: (760) 585-7070
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116
Carlsbad, CA 92008
The reported results relate only to the samples as received and parameters tested by the laboratory.
Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.
Please feel free to call me at (562) 219-7435 if I can be of further assistance to your company.
Sincerely,
Ferdinand Paul Lugtu
Laboratory Director
Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on May 22, 2026 by ASSET Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.
The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or in its entirety without written permission from the client and ASSET Laboratories - California. 1 of 31
Attachment "7"
1219
Item9.
ASSET Laboratories Date: 02-Jun-26
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
CASE NARRATIVE
SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:
All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.
Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist Form.
Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.
Samples were analyzed within method holding time.
Results were J-Flag. "J" is used to flag those results that are between the PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit) and the calculated MDL (Method Detection Limit). Results that are "J" Flagged are estimated values since it becomes difficult to accurately quantitate the analyte near the MDL.
Analytical Comments for EPA 6010B:
Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) are outside recovery criteria for Antimony in QC samples N084189-001B-MS and N084189-001B-MSD possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
Analytical Comments for EPA 8082:
Matrix Spike (MS) is outside recovery criteria for Aroclor 1260 in QC sample N084180-001B-MS possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
RPD for Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) is outside criteria for Aroclor 1260 in QC sample N084180-001B-MS/MSD; however, the analytical batch was validated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).
Analytical Comments for EPA 8260B:
Matrix Spike (MS) is outside recovery criteria for Chloroethane in QC sample N084148-006BMS possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
2 of 31
Attachment "7"
1220
Item9.
ASSET Laboratories Date: 02-Jun-26
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N084195-001A S1 Soil 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-001B S1 Soil 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-002A S2 Soil 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-002B S2 Soil 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-003A S3 Soil 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-003B S3 Soil 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-004A S4 Soil 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 N084195-004B S4 Soil 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM 5/22/2026 6/2/2026 3 of 31
Attachment
Attachment 7
"7"
1221
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S1
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: JSP
EPA 3050B
RunID: CA01638-ICP01_260527A 132107 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Antimony 2.0 mg/Kg ND 0.28 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg 1.2 0.11 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Barium 1.0 mg/Kg 49 0.090 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Beryllium 0.17 0.090 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Cadmium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.15 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Chromium 1.0 mg/Kg 15 0.12 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Cobalt 1.0 mg/Kg 6.7 0.040 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Copper 2.0 mg/Kg 8.8 0.34 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Lead 1.0 mg/Kg 2.3 0.14 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Molybdenum 0.25 0.11 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Nickel 1.0 mg/Kg 4.2 0.13 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Selenium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.39 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Silver 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.13 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Thallium 2.0 mg/Kg ND 0.24 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Vanadium 1.0 mg/Kg 37 0.070 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
Zinc 1.0 mg/Kg 16 0.12 5/27/2026 04:46 PM 1
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.5 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
4 of 31
Attachment "7"
1222
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S1
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 2-Butanone 50 μg/Kg ND 27 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.94 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
4-Isopropyltoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Benzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Bromobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.91 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Bromodichloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Bromoform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Bromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Chlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.76 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Chloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.7 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Chloroform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Chloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.81 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Dibromochloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Dibromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Ethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.79 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Freon-113 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Isopropylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
m,p-Xylene 10 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 MTBE 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
n-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
n-Propylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Naphthalene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
o-Xylene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
sec-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
5 of 31
Attachment "7"
1223
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S1
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC Styrene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Toluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Trichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.99 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Vinyl chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 70-146 %REC 128 0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 80-124 %REC 94.4 0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 73-136 %REC 124 0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1 Surr: Toluene-d8 80-120 %REC 102 0 5/26/2026 02:35 PM 1
PCBS BY GC/ECD
EPA 8082
Analyst: KP
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_260528B 132114 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Aroclor 1016 17 μg/Kg ND 8.2 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1221 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1232 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1242 17 μg/Kg ND 8.3 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1248 17 μg/Kg ND 8.9 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1254 17 μg/Kg ND 9.3 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Aroclor 1260 17 μg/Kg ND 8.4 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 34-120 %REC 88.2 0 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 33-120 %REC 86.4 0 5/28/2026 03:19 PM 1
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
RunID: NV00922-AA3_260527C 132093 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/26/2026 Analyst: DJ Mercury 0.10 mg/Kg ND 0.034 5/27/2026 12:51 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
6 of 31
Attachment "7"
1224
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S2
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: JSP
EPA 3050B
RunID: CA01638-ICP01_260527A 132107 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Antimony 2.0 mg/Kg ND 0.28 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg 1.7 0.11 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Barium 1.0 mg/Kg 120 0.090 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Beryllium 0.17 0.090 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Cadmium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.15 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Chromium 1.0 mg/Kg 26 0.12 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Cobalt 1.0 mg/Kg 10 0.040 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Copper 2.0 mg/Kg 18 0.34 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Lead 1.0 mg/Kg 2.3 0.14 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Molybdenum 0.13 0.11 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Nickel 1.0 mg/Kg 8.8 0.13 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Selenium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.39 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Silver 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.13 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Thallium 0.63 0.24 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 2.0 mg/Kg J 1
Vanadium 1.0 mg/Kg 64 0.070 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
Zinc 1.0 mg/Kg 27 0.12 5/27/2026 04:49 PM 1
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.5 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
7 of 31
Attachment "7"
1225
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S2
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 2-Butanone 50 μg/Kg ND 27 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.94 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
4-Isopropyltoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Benzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Bromobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.91 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Bromodichloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Bromoform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Bromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Chlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.76 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Chloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.7 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Chloroform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Chloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.81 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Dibromochloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Dibromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Ethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.79 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Freon-113 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Isopropylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
m,p-Xylene 10 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 MTBE 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
n-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
n-Propylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Naphthalene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
o-Xylene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
sec-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
8 of 31
Attachment "7"
1226
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S2
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC Styrene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Toluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Trichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.99 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Vinyl chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 70-146 %REC 127 0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 80-124 %REC 94.0 0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 73-136 %REC 123 0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1 Surr: Toluene-d8 80-120 %REC 102 0 5/26/2026 03:02 PM 1
PCBS BY GC/ECD
EPA 8082
Analyst: KP
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_260528B 132114 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Aroclor 1016 17 μg/Kg ND 8.2 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1221 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1232 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1242 17 μg/Kg ND 8.3 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1248 17 μg/Kg ND 9.0 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1254 17 μg/Kg ND 9.3 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Aroclor 1260 17 μg/Kg ND 8.4 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 34-120 %REC 95.0 0 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 33-120 %REC 94.2 0 5/28/2026 03:35 PM 1
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
RunID: NV00922-AA3_260527C 132093 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/26/2026 Analyst: DJ Mercury 0.065 0.034 5/27/2026 12:58 PM 0.10 mg/Kg J 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
9 of 31
Attachment "7"
1227
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S3
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: JSP
EPA 3050B
RunID: CA01638-ICP01_260527A 132107 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Antimony 2.0 mg/Kg ND 0.28 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg 1.4 0.11 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Barium 1.0 mg/Kg 100 0.090 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Beryllium 0.25 0.090 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Cadmium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.15 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Chromium 1.0 mg/Kg 23 0.12 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Cobalt 1.0 mg/Kg 8.6 0.040 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Copper 2.0 mg/Kg 13 0.34 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Lead 1.0 mg/Kg 2.7 0.14 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Molybdenum 0.15 0.11 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Nickel 1.0 mg/Kg 8.7 0.13 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Selenium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.39 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Silver 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.13 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Thallium 0.45 0.24 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 2.0 mg/Kg J 1
Vanadium 1.0 mg/Kg 56 0.070 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
Zinc 1.0 mg/Kg 23 0.12 5/27/2026 04:52 PM 1
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.5 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
10 of 31
Attachment "7"
1228
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S3
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 2-Butanone 50 μg/Kg ND 27 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.94 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
4-Isopropyltoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Benzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Bromobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.91 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Bromodichloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Bromoform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Bromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Chlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.76 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Chloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.7 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Chloroform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Chloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.81 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Dibromochloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Dibromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Ethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.79 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Freon-113 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Isopropylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
m,p-Xylene 10 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 MTBE 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
n-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
n-Propylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Naphthalene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
o-Xylene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
sec-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
11 of 31
Attachment "7"
1229
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S3
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC Styrene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Toluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Trichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.99 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Vinyl chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 70-146 %REC 127 0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 80-124 %REC 92.4 0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 73-136 %REC 123 0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1 Surr: Toluene-d8 80-120 %REC 103 0 5/26/2026 03:29 PM 1
PCBS BY GC/ECD
EPA 8082
Analyst: KP
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_260528B 132114 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Aroclor 1016 17 μg/Kg ND 8.2 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1221 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1232 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1242 17 μg/Kg ND 8.3 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1248 17 μg/Kg ND 9.0 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1254 17 μg/Kg ND 9.3 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Aroclor 1260 17 μg/Kg ND 8.4 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 34-120 %REC 88.3 0 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 33-120 %REC 90.0 0 5/28/2026 03:50 PM 1
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
RunID: NV00922-AA3_260527C 132093 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/26/2026 Analyst: DJ Mercury 0.099 mg/Kg ND 0.034 5/27/2026 01:00 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
12 of 31
Attachment "7"
1230
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S4
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: JSP
EPA 3050B
RunID: CA01638-ICP01_260527A 132107 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Antimony 2.0 mg/Kg ND 0.28 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg 2.4 0.11 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Barium 1.0 mg/Kg 100 0.090 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Beryllium 0.18 0.090 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Cadmium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.15 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Chromium 1.0 mg/Kg 33 0.12 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Cobalt 1.0 mg/Kg 10 0.040 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Copper 2.0 mg/Kg 19 0.34 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Lead 1.0 mg/Kg 2.7 0.14 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Molybdenum 0.23 0.11 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1.0 mg/Kg J 1
Nickel 1.0 mg/Kg 12 0.13 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Selenium 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.39 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Silver 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.13 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Thallium 0.77 0.24 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 2.0 mg/Kg J 1
Vanadium 1.0 mg/Kg 71 0.070 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
Zinc 1.0 mg/Kg 29 0.12 5/27/2026 04:55 PM 1
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.5 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
13 of 31
Attachment "7"
1231
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S4
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.3 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 2-Butanone 50 μg/Kg ND 27 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.94 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
4-Isopropyltoluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.2 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Benzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Bromobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.91 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Bromodichloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.2 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Bromoform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.85 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Bromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Chlorobenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.76 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Chloroethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.7 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Chloroform 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Chloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.81 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Dibromochloromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Dibromomethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Ethylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.79 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Freon-113 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Isopropylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
m,p-Xylene 10 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 MTBE 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
n-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
n-Propylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Naphthalene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.9 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
o-Xylene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
sec-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
14 of 31
Attachment "7"
1232
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
Client Sample ID: S4
Collection Date: 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLC
Lab Order: N084195
Lab ID: N084195-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Jun-26
Analyses Result Qual MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
RunID: CA01638-MS10_260526A CA26VS064 QC Batch: PrepDate: Analyst: AC Styrene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.71 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.1 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Tetrachloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.4 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Toluene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.96 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.7 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Trichloroethene 5.0 μg/Kg ND 0.99 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 μg/Kg ND 2.3 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Vinyl chloride 5.0 μg/Kg ND 1.8 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 70-146 %REC 129 0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 80-124 %REC 96.2 0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 73-136 %REC 122 0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1 Surr: Toluene-d8 80-120 %REC 103 0 5/26/2026 03:56 PM 1
PCBS BY GC/ECD
EPA 8082
Analyst: KP
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_260528B 132114 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/27/2026 Aroclor 1016 16 μg/Kg ND 8.1 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1221 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1232 33 μg/Kg ND 10 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1242 16 μg/Kg ND 8.3 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1248 16 μg/Kg ND 8.9 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1254 16 μg/Kg ND 9.2 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Aroclor 1260 16 μg/Kg ND 8.3 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 34-120 %REC 101 0 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 33-120 %REC 99.0 0 5/28/2026 04:06 PM 1
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
RunID: NV00922-AA3_260527C 132093 QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/26/2026 Analyst: DJ Mercury 0.099 mg/Kg ND 0.034 5/27/2026 01:03 PM 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out (M) Test is modified
15 of 31
Attachment "7"
1233
Item9.
02-Jun-26 Date: ASSET Laboratories
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CACLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 7471_S
Sample ID MB-132093
Batch ID: 132093 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/26/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219936
SeqNo: 7751475
MBLK SampType: TestCode: 7471_S
MDL
Mercury 0.10 ND 0.034
Sample ID LCS-132093
Batch ID: 132093 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/26/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 219936
SeqNo: 7751476
LCS SampType: TestCode: 7471_S
MDL
Mercury 0.4167 108 80 120 0.10 0 0.451 0.034
Sample ID N084189-001B-MS
Batch ID: 132093 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/26/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219936
SeqNo: 7751480
MS SampType: TestCode: 7471_S
MDL
Mercury 0.4166 108 75 125 0.10 0.03540 0.484 0.034
Sample ID N084189-001B-MSD
Batch ID: 132093 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/26/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219936
SeqNo: 7751481
MSD SampType: TestCode: 7471_S
MDL
Mercury 0.4154 108 75 125 20 0.10 0.03540 0.4836 0.265 0.482 0.034 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 16 of 31
Attachment "7"
1234
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
Sample ID LCS-132114 PCB
Batch ID: 132114 TestNo: EPA 8082 Analysis Date: 5/28/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 220022
SeqNo: 7757816
LCS SampType: TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
EPA 3546
MDL
Aroclor 1016 166.7 100 47 120 16 0 167.342 8.2
Aroclor 1260 166.7 101 50 120 16 0 168.548 8.4
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.67 91.3 34 120 15.212 0
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.67 89.2 33 120 14.875 0
Sample ID MB-132114
Batch ID: 132114 TestNo: EPA 8082 Analysis Date: 5/28/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 220022
SeqNo: 7757817
MBLK SampType: TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
EPA 3546
MDL
Aroclor 1016 16 ND 8.2
Aroclor 1221 33 ND 10
Aroclor 1232 33 ND 10Aroclor 1242 16 ND 8.3
Aroclor 1248 16 ND 8.9Aroclor 1254 16 ND 9.2Aroclor 1260 16 ND 8.4 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.67 87.4 34 120 14.578 0
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.67 84.6 33 120 14.103 0
Sample ID N084180-001B-MS
Batch ID: 132114 TestNo: EPA 8082 Analysis Date: 5/28/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 220022
SeqNo: 7757819
MS SampType: TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
EPA 3546
MDL
Aroclor 1016 167.1 103 24 125 17 0 172.275 8.2
Aroclor 1260 167.1 125 25 121 S 17 0 208.343 8.4
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.71 82.5 34 120 13.795 0
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.71 79.9 33 120 13.357 0
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 17 of 31
Attachment "7"
1235
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
Sample ID N084180-001B-MSD
Batch ID: 132114 TestNo: EPA 8082 Analysis Date: 5/28/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 220022
SeqNo: 7757820
MSD SampType: TestCode: 8082SOIL_M
EPA 3546
MDL
Aroclor 1016 167.2 89.7 24 125 20 17 0 172.3 13.8 150.014 8.2 Aroclor 1260 167.2 92.1 25 121 20 R 17 0 208.3 29.9 154.088 8.4 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.73 75.3 34 120 0 12.590 0
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.73 77.0 33 120 0 12.874 0 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 18 of 31
Attachment "7"
1236
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_6010_S
Sample ID LCS-132107
Batch ID: 132107 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 219912
SeqNo: 7750043
LCS SampType: TestCode: CA_6010_S
EPA 3050B
MDL
Antimony 25.00 98.5 80 120 2.0 0 24.629 0.28
Arsenic 25.00 97.5 80 120 1.0 0 24.378 0.11Barium 25.00 104 80 120 1.0 0 25.930 0.090Beryllium 25.00 103 80 120 1.0 0 25.743 0.090Cadmium 25.00 102 80 120 1.0 0 25.484 0.15Chromium 25.00 107 80 120 1.0 0 26.744 0.12Cobalt 25.00 102 80 120 1.0 0 25.563 0.040Copper 25.00 108 80 120 2.0 0 27.083 0.34Lead 25.00 105 80 120 1.0 0 26.217 0.14Molybdenum 25.00 107 80 120 1.0 0 26.674 0.11Nickel 25.00 102 80 120 1.0 0 25.476 0.13Selenium 25.00 91.0 80 120 1.0 0 22.760 0.39Silver 25.00 115 80 120 1.0 0 28.650 0.13Thallium 25.00 104 80 120 2.0 0 25.931 0.24Vanadium 25.00 106 80 120 1.0 0 26.588 0.070Zinc 25.00 99.8 80 120 1.0 0 24.941 0.12Sample ID MB-132107 Batch ID: 132107 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219912
SeqNo: 7750044
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_6010_S
EPA 3050B
MDL
Antimony J 2.0 0.382 0.28
Arsenic 1.0 ND 0.11
Barium 1.0 ND 0.090Beryllium 1.0 ND 0.090Cadmium 1.0 ND 0.15Chromium 1.0 ND 0.12Cobalt 1.0 ND 0.040Copper 2.0 ND 0.34Lead 1.0 ND 0.14 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 19 of 31
Attachment "7"
1237
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_6010_S
Sample ID MB-132107
Batch ID: 132107 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219912
SeqNo: 7750044
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_6010_S
EPA 3050B
MDL
Molybdenum 1.0 ND 0.11
Nickel 1.0 ND 0.13Selenium 1.0 ND 0.39Silver 1.0 ND 0.13Thallium 2.0 ND 0.24Vanadium 1.0 ND 0.070Zinc 1.0 ND 0.12Sample ID N084189-001B-MS Batch ID: 132107 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219912
SeqNo: 7750048
MS SampType: TestCode: CA_6010_S
EPA 3050B
MDL
Antimony 25.00 49.3 75 125 S 2.0 0.3250 12.653 0.28
Arsenic 25.00 92.7 75 125 1.0 11.75 34.929 0.11Barium 25.00 79.1 75 125 1.0 107.0 126.807 0.090 Beryllium 25.00 95.6 75 125 1.0 0.2935 24.203 0.090
Cadmium 25.00 93.5 75 125 1.0 0 23.374 0.15Chromium 25.00 103 75 125 1.0 7.138 32.893 0.12Cobalt 25.00 95.1 75 125 1.0 4.370 28.142 0.040Copper 25.00 116 75 125 2.0 6.523 35.471 0.34Lead 25.00 94.2 75 125 1.0 1.807 25.358 0.14Molybdenum 25.00 94.3 75 125 1.0 0.2230 23.808 0.11Nickel 25.00 96.6 75 125 1.0 4.479 28.639 0.13Selenium 25.00 82.8 75 125 1.0 0 20.708 0.39Silver 25.00 113 75 125 1.0 0 28.362 0.13Thallium 25.00 86.1 75 125 2.0 0.2810 21.816 0.24Vanadium 25.00 112 75 125 1.0 34.68 62.705 0.070Zinc 25.00 104 75 125 1.0 35.81 61.875 0.12 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 20 of 31
Attachment "7"
1238
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_6010_S
Sample ID N084189-001B-MSD
Batch ID: 132107 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 5/27/2026 Prep Date: 5/27/2026
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219912
SeqNo: 7750049
MSD SampType: TestCode: CA_6010_S
EPA 3050B
MDL
Antimony 25.00 49.2 75 125 20 S 2.0 0.3250 12.65 0.261 12.620 0.28 Arsenic 25.00 93.0 75 125 20 1.0 11.75 34.93 0.192 34.996 0.11Barium 25.00 78.2 75 125 20 1.0 107.0 126.8 0.171 126.591 0.090 Beryllium 25.00 95.5 75 125 20 1.0 0.2935 24.20 0.151 24.167 0.090 Cadmium 25.00 93.5 75 125 20 1.0 0 23.37 0.0492 23.386 0.15Chromium 25.00 103 75 125 20 1.0 7.138 32.89 0.227 32.819 0.12Cobalt 25.00 95.0 75 125 20 1.0 4.370 28.14 0.0764 28.120 0.040Copper 25.00 115 75 125 20 2.0 6.523 35.47 0.241 35.385 0.34Lead 25.00 94.5 75 125 20 1.0 1.807 25.36 0.268 25.426 0.14Molybdenum 25.00 94.2 75 125 20 1.0 0.2230 23.81 0.193 23.762 0.11Nickel 25.00 96.6 75 125 20 1.0 4.479 28.64 0.0332 28.629 0.13Selenium 25.00 82.6 75 125 20 1.0 0 20.71 0.264 20.654 0.39Silver 25.00 113 75 125 20 1.0 0 28.36 0.251 28.291 0.13Thallium 25.00 85.6 75 125 20 2.0 0.2810 21.82 0.602 21.685 0.24Vanadium 25.00 112 75 125 20 1.0 34.68 62.70 0.196 62.582 0.070Zinc 25.00 104 75 125 20 1.0 35.81 61.87 0.0945 61.933 0.12 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 21 of 31
Attachment "7"
1239
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-LCS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749167
LCS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 102 80 123 5.0 0 40.620 1.1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 105 80 129 5.0 0 42.100 2.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 90.8 76 126 5.0 0 36.330 1.41,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 98.6 80 120 5.0 0 39.430 1.31,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 112 76 128 5.0 0 44.660 2.21,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 98.1 75 120 5.0 0 39.240 2.01,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 95.2 80 124 5.0 0 38.070 1.11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 108 80 120 5.0 0 43.310 1.11,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 98.6 80 123 5.0 0 39.450 1.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 107 80 123 5.0 0 42.770 0.851,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 111 80 122 5.0 0 44.420 1.41,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 98.8 74 129 10 0 39.510 2.31,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 102 80 122 5.0 0 40.780 1.21,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 97.0 80 120 5.0 0 38.820 1.11,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 98.1 78 129 5.0 0 39.240 1.31,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 97.9 80 120 5.0 0 39.160 1.21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 107 80 126 5.0 0 42.940 1.71,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 101 80 120 5.0 0 40.270 1.31,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 99.8 80 120 5.0 0 39.930 1.11,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 96.2 80 120 5.0 0 38.480 1.42,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 98.6 80 126 5.0 0 39.440 2.02-Butanone 400.0 90.4 50 152 50 0 361.680 27 2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 104 80 124 5.0 0 41.730 0.94
4-Chlorotoluene 40.00 104 80 124 5.0 0 41.750 1.14-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 105 80 124 5.0 0 41.970 2.2Benzene 40.00 97.3 80 120 5.0 0 38.920 0.96Bromobenzene 40.00 100 80 120 5.0 0 40.080 0.91Bromodichloromethane 40.00 97.8 80 126 5.0 0 39.130 1.2Bromoform 40.00 108 80 126 5.0 0 43.030 0.85Bromomethane 40.00 110 51 143 5.0 0 43.870 2.4 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 22 of 31
Attachment "7"
1240
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-LCS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749167
LCS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 93.9 78 140 5.0 0 37.550 1.7 Chlorobenzene 40.00 99.9 80 120 5.0 0 39.960 0.76Chloroethane 40.00 121 66 131 5.0 0 48.240 2.7Chloroform 40.00 105 80 124 5.0 0 42.030 2.0Chloromethane 40.00 107 52 143 5.0 0 42.610 1.8cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 109 80 120 5.0 0 43.650 1.9cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 90.2 80 120 5.0 0 36.090 0.81Dibromochloromethane 40.00 95.6 80 125 5.0 0 38.230 0.96Dibromomethane 40.00 102 80 120 5.0 0 40.800 1.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 76.9 53 141 5.0 0 30.760 1.8Ethylbenzene 40.00 98.4 80 120 5.0 0 39.380 0.79Freon-113 40.00 99.1 76 126 5.0 0 39.650 2.1Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 93.7 80 120 5.0 0 37.470 2.0Isopropylbenzene 40.00 103 80 127 5.0 0 41.300 1.7m,p-Xylene 80.00 104 80 129 10 0 83.540 1.4Methylene chloride 40.00 101 64 125 5.0 0 40.520 2.1MTBE 40.00 107 69 131 5.0 0 42.790 1.9n-Butylbenzene 40.00 104 80 123 5.0 0 41.580 2.4n-Propylbenzene 40.00 101 80 129 5.0 0 40.250 1.9Naphthalene 40.00 93.2 71 120 5.0 0 37.270 1.9o-Xylene 40.00 101 80 124 5.0 0 40.200 0.71sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 98.2 80 126 5.0 0 39.290 2.0Styrene 40.00 110 80 122 5.0 0 44.090 0.71tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 106 80 126 5.0 0 42.230 2.1Tetrachloroethene 40.00 91.6 80 125 5.0 0 36.620 1.4Toluene 40.00 94.0 80 120 5.0 0 37.610 0.96trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 101 72 127 5.0 0 40.420 1.7Trichloroethene 40.00 92.2 80 120 5.0 0 36.900 0.99Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 106 73 134 5.0 0 42.200 2.3Vinyl chloride 40.00 95.5 65 126 5.0 0 38.210 1.8 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 23 of 31
Attachment "7"
1241
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-LCS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749167
LCS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 107 70 146 53.470 0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 103 80 124 51.580 0Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 109 73 136 54.420 0Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 101 80 120 50.390 0 Sample ID N084148-006BMS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749168
MS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 99.5 76 121 5.0 0 39.810 1.1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 109 58 125 5.0 0 43.630 2.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 96.8 56 157 5.0 0 38.720 1.41,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 101 78 129 5.0 0 40.450 1.31,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 115 62 124 5.0 0 46.060 2.21,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 97.8 53 120 5.0 0 39.130 2.01,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 98.8 61 122 5.0 0 39.520 1.11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 102 51 140 5.0 0 40.780 1.11,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 102 74 138 5.0 0 40.850 1.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 93.8 47 150 5.0 0 37.520 0.851,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 106 60 126 5.0 0 42.230 1.41,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 109 70 149 10 0 43.770 2.31,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 108 80 132 5.0 0 43.190 1.21,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 93.5 71 125 5.0 0 37.400 1.11,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 101 75 133 5.0 0 40.320 1.31,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 98.6 76 120 5.0 0 39.450 1.21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 102 62 125 5.0 0 40.930 1.71,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 94.7 42 151 5.0 0 37.890 1.31,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 101 80 123 5.0 0 40.420 1.11,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 92.0 67 120 5.0 0 36.800 1.42,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 101 56 122 5.0 0 40.460 2.0 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 24 of 31
Attachment "7"
1242
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID N084148-006BMS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749168
MS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
2-Butanone 400.0 105 55 163 50 0 421.350 27
2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 98.2 63 127 5.0 0 39.270 0.94
4-Chlorotoluene 40.00 99.5 70 121 5.0 0 39.790 1.14-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 98.9 53 125 5.0 0 39.570 2.2Benzene 40.00 96.9 71 120 5.0 0 38.770 0.96Bromobenzene 40.00 94.6 76 120 5.0 0 37.840 0.91Bromodichloromethane 40.00 103 78 124 5.0 0 41.000 1.2Bromoform 40.00 112 79 137 5.0 0 44.730 0.85Bromomethane 40.00 107 41 132 5.0 0 42.700 2.4Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 99.2 55 132 5.0 0 39.680 1.7Chlorobenzene 40.00 96.4 73 120 5.0 0 38.560 0.76Chloroethane 40.00 130 42 128 S 5.0 0 51.830 2.7Chloroform 40.00 106 67 122 5.0 0 42.500 2.0Chloromethane 40.00 104 45 127 5.0 0 41.480 1.8cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 111 68 120 5.0 0 44.520 1.9cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 90.8 78 120 5.0 0 36.330 0.81Dibromochloromethane 40.00 96.9 80 127 5.0 0 38.740 0.96Dibromomethane 40.00 105 80 121 5.0 0 41.920 1.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 83.0 40 121 5.0 0 33.210 1.8Ethylbenzene 40.00 95.1 64 120 5.0 0 38.040 0.79Freon-113 40.00 103 52 123 5.0 0 41.360 2.1Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 85.3 48 128 5.0 0 34.110 2.0Isopropylbenzene 40.00 102 58 127 5.0 0 40.840 1.7m,p-Xylene 80.00 102 64 128 10 0 81.560 1.4Methylene chloride 40.00 104 60 120 5.0 0 41.460 2.1MTBE 40.00 112 74 130 5.0 0 44.850 1.9n-Butylbenzene 40.00 97.5 52 124 5.0 0 38.980 2.4n-Propylbenzene 40.00 99.0 61 127 5.0 0 39.580 1.9Naphthalene 40.00 97.0 47 153 5.0 0 38.800 1.9o-Xylene 40.00 99.6 63 125 5.0 0 39.840 0.71 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 25 of 31
Attachment "7"
1243
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID N084148-006BMS
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749168
MS SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 96.7 54 128 5.0 0 38.680 2.0
Styrene 40.00 106 66 123 5.0 0 42.520 0.71tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 102 58 123 5.0 0 40.690 2.1Tetrachloroethene 40.00 88.8 58 123 5.0 0 35.500 1.4Toluene 40.00 94.3 67 120 5.0 0 37.730 0.96trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 107 58 120 5.0 0 42.740 1.7Trichloroethene 40.00 90.9 60 125 5.0 0 36.360 0.99Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 114 49 128 5.0 0 45.550 2.3Vinyl chloride 40.00 107 49 120 5.0 0 42.880 1.8 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 106 70 146 53.140 0Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 104 80 124 51.890 0Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 108 73 136 54.090 0Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 99.2 80 120 49.580 0 Sample ID N084148-006BMSD
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749169
MSD SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 97.2 76 121 20 5.0 0 39.81 2.39 38.870 1.1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 104 58 125 20 5.0 0 43.63 5.15 41.440 2.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 91.6 56 157 20 5.0 0 38.72 5.55 36.630 1.41,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 101 78 129 20 5.0 0 40.45 0.0989 40.410 1.3 1,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 110 62 124 20 5.0 0 46.06 4.26 44.140 2.2 1,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 93.4 53 120 20 5.0 0 39.13 4.63 37.360 2.01,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 96.2 61 122 20 5.0 0 39.52 2.72 38.460 1.11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 104 51 140 20 5.0 0 40.78 1.85 41.540 1.11,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 98.1 74 138 20 5.0 0 40.85 4.05 39.230 1.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 97.3 47 150 20 5.0 0 37.52 3.64 38.910 0.85 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 104 60 126 20 5.0 0 42.23 1.89 41.440 1.4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 113 70 149 20 10 0 43.77 3.08 45.140 2.3 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 26 of 31
Attachment "7"
1244
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID N084148-006BMSD
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749169
MSD SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 112 80 132 20 5.0 0 43.19 3.88 44.900 1.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 91.7 71 125 20 5.0 0 37.40 1.92 36.690 1.11,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 99.9 75 133 20 5.0 0 40.32 0.872 39.970 1.3 1,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 100 76 120 20 5.0 0 39.45 1.71 40.130 1.2 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 99.0 62 125 20 5.0 0 40.93 3.30 39.600 1.71,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 92.4 42 151 20 5.0 0 37.89 2.51 36.950 1.31,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 101 80 123 20 5.0 0 40.42 0.0990 40.380 1.1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 89.3 67 120 20 5.0 0 36.80 3.01 35.710 1.4 2,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 93.8 56 122 20 5.0 0 40.46 7.54 37.520 2.02-Butanone 400.0 103 55 163 20 50 0 421.4 2.63 410.410 27 2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 94.0 63 127 20 5.0 0 39.27 4.34 37.600 0.944-Chlorotoluene 40.00 94.7 70 121 20 5.0 0 39.79 4.92 37.880 1.1 4-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 93.8 53 125 20 5.0 0 39.57 5.37 37.500 2.2Benzene 40.00 94.2 71 120 20 5.0 0 38.77 2.85 37.680 0.96 Bromobenzene 40.00 93.7 76 120 20 5.0 0 37.84 0.956 37.480 0.91Bromodichloromethane 40.00 101 78 124 20 5.0 0 41.00 1.13 40.540 1.2 Bromoform 40.00 111 79 137 20 5.0 0 44.73 1.12 44.230 0.85 Bromomethane 40.00 101 41 132 20 5.0 0 42.70 5.49 40.420 2.4 Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 94.8 55 132 20 5.0 0 39.68 4.48 37.940 1.7Chlorobenzene 40.00 93.3 73 120 20 5.0 0 38.56 3.27 37.320 0.76 Chloroethane 40.00 107 42 128 20 5.0 0 51.83 19.1 42.800 2.7 Chloroform 40.00 102 67 122 20 5.0 0 42.50 3.86 40.890 2.0Chloromethane 40.00 96.5 45 127 20 5.0 0 41.48 7.24 38.580 1.8cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 101 68 120 20 5.0 0 44.52 10.1 40.250 1.9cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 92.4 78 120 20 5.0 0 36.33 1.67 36.940 0.81 Dibromochloromethane 40.00 97.1 80 127 20 5.0 0 38.74 0.258 38.840 0.96Dibromomethane 40.00 103 80 121 20 5.0 0 41.92 2.02 41.080 1.1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 79.0 40 121 20 5.0 0 33.21 4.97 31.600 1.8Ethylbenzene 40.00 93.0 64 120 20 5.0 0 38.04 2.26 37.190 0.79 Freon-113 40.00 98.0 52 123 20 5.0 0 41.36 5.34 39.210 2.1 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 27 of 31
Attachment "7"
1245
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID N084148-006BMSD
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749169
MSD SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 86.9 48 128 20 5.0 0 34.11 1.83 34.740 2.0 Isopropylbenzene 40.00 97.3 58 127 20 5.0 0 40.84 4.84 38.910 1.7m,p-Xylene 80.00 98.3 64 128 20 10 0 81.56 3.68 78.610 1.4Methylene chloride 40.00 104 60 120 20 5.0 0 41.46 0 41.460 2.1 MTBE 40.00 112 74 130 20 5.0 0 44.85 0.178 44.930 1.9
n-Butylbenzene 40.00 92.6 52 124 20 5.0 0 38.98 5.13 37.030 2.4 n-Propylbenzene 40.00 92.4 61 127 20 5.0 0 39.58 6.90 36.940 1.9Naphthalene 40.00 99.2 47 153 20 5.0 0 38.80 2.29 39.700 1.9o-Xylene 40.00 96.9 63 125 20 5.0 0 39.84 2.77 38.750 0.71 sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 90.4 54 128 20 5.0 0 38.68 6.76 36.150 2.0 Styrene 40.00 104 66 123 20 5.0 0 42.52 1.85 41.740 0.71 tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 95.9 58 123 20 5.0 0 40.69 5.87 38.370 2.1 Tetrachloroethene 40.00 88.1 58 123 20 5.0 0 35.50 0.735 35.240 1.4 Toluene 40.00 90.2 67 120 20 5.0 0 37.73 4.44 36.090 0.96trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 100 58 120 20 5.0 0 42.74 6.47 40.060 1.7 Trichloroethene 40.00 91.0 60 125 20 5.0 0 36.36 0.137 36.410 0.99 Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 104 49 128 20 5.0 0 45.55 8.61 41.790 2.3 Vinyl chloride 40.00 99.8 49 120 20 5.0 0 42.88 7.17 39.910 1.8 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 111 70 146 0 55.500 0 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 104 80 124 0 52.010 0Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 111 73 136 0 55.440 0Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 102 80 120 0 50.780 0 Sample ID C260526-MB2
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749170
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 ND 1.1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 ND 2.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 ND 1.4 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 28 of 31
Attachment "7"
1246
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-MB2
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749170
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 ND 1.3
1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND 2.21,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND 2.01,1-Dichloropropene 5.0 ND 1.11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 ND 1.11,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 ND 1.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 ND 0.851,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 ND 1.41,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10 ND 2.31,2-Dibromoethane 5.0 ND 1.21,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND 1.11,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND 1.31,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND 1.21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.0 ND 1.71,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND 1.31,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND 1.11,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND 1.42,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND 2.02-Butanone 50 ND 27 2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 ND 0.94
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 ND 1.14-Isopropyltoluene 5.0 ND 2.2Benzene 5.0 ND 0.96Bromobenzene 5.0 ND 0.91Bromodichloromethane 5.0 ND 1.2Bromoform 5.0 ND 0.85Bromomethane 5.0 ND 2.4Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 ND 1.7Chlorobenzene 5.0 ND 0.76Chloroethane 5.0 ND 2.7 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 29 of 31
Attachment "7"
1247
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-MB2
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749170
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
Chloroform 5.0 ND 2.0
Chloromethane 5.0 ND 1.8cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND 1.9cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 ND 0.81Dibromochloromethane 5.0 ND 0.96Dibromomethane 5.0 ND 1.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 ND 1.8Ethylbenzene 5.0 ND 0.79Freon-113 5.0 ND 2.1Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 ND 2.0Isopropylbenzene 5.0 ND 1.7m,p-Xylene 10 ND 1.4Methylene chloride 5.0 ND 2.1MTBE 5.0 ND 1.9n-Butylbenzene 5.0 ND 2.4n-Propylbenzene 5.0 ND 1.9Naphthalene 5.0 ND 1.9o-Xylene 5.0 ND 0.71sec-Butylbenzene 5.0 ND 2.0Styrene 5.0 ND 0.71tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 ND 2.1Tetrachloroethene 5.0 ND 1.4Toluene 5.0 ND 0.96trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND 1.7Trichloroethene 5.0 ND 0.99Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 ND 2.3Vinyl chloride 5.0 ND 1.8 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 121 70 146 60.480 0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 94.1 80 124 47.040 0Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 121 73 136 60.300 0 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 30 of 31
Attachment "7"
1248
Item9.
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA
CLIENT: Weis Environmental, LLCWork Order: N084195 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: CA_8260SOIL
Sample ID C260526-MB2
Batch ID: CA26VS064 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 5/26/2026 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD Low
Limit
High
Limit RPDLimit Qual
Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 219881
SeqNo: 7749170
MBLK SampType: TestCode: CA_8260SOI
MDL
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 102 80 120 51.190 0
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 31 of 31
Attachment "7"
1249
Item9.
N084195 -001
-002-003-004
Attachment "7"
1250
Item9.
ASSET Laboratories
Please review the checklist below. Any NO signifies non-compliance. Any non-compliance will be noted and must be understood as having an impact on the quality of the data. All tests will be performed as requested regardless of any compliance issues.
If you have any questions or further instruction, please contact our Project Coordinator at (702) 307-2659.
Carrier name: ASSET
Cooler Received/Opened On: 5/22/2026
Rep sample Temp (Deg C): 3.2 IR Gun ID: 2
Temp Blank: Yes No
Last 4 digits of Tracking No.: NA
Cooling process: Ice Ice Pack Dry Ice Other None
Packing Material Used: None
Workorder: N084195
Sample Receipt Checklist
4. Chain of custody present? Yes No
6. Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
7. Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
8. Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No
9. Sample containers intact? Yes No
10. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
11. All samples received within holding time? Yes No
13. Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Yes No NA
14. Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No NA
Example: pH > 12 for (CN,S); pH<2 for Metals
1. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present
2. Custody seals intact, signed, dated on shippping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present
3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present
5. Sampler's name present in COC? Yes No
12. Temperature of rep sample or Temp Blank within acceptable limit? Yes No NA
15. Did the bottle labels indicate correct preservatives used? Yes No NA
16. Were there Non-Conformance issues at login? Yes No NA Was Client notified? Yes No NA
Comments: Subsample for 8082. Received at Las Vegas Lab on 5/23/2026 at 2.0°C, IR#4, via SW#4091.
Checklist Completed B\
AES Reviewed By: TM
05/29/2026
Attachment "7"
1251
Item9.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 29-May-26
WorkOrder: N084195
Client ID:Comments:
WEIEN01
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
5/22/2026
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
4:31 PM
N084195-001A S1 5/21/2026 2:10:00 AM 6/2/2026 Soil EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction WS 6/2/2026 EPA 8082 PCBs BY GC/ECD WS
N084195-001B 6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 3050B Prep for Metals Soil WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS-CA6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
WS-CA
N084195-002A S2 5/21/2026 2:26:00 AM 6/2/2026 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction WS 6/2/2026 EPA 8082 PCBs BY GC/ECD WS
N084195-002B 6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 3050B Prep for Metals Soil WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS-CA6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
WS-CA
N084195-003A S3 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM 6/2/2026 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction WS 6/2/2026 EPA 8082 PCBs BY GC/ECD WS
1 of 2 Page
Attachment "7"
1252
Item9.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 29-May-26
WorkOrder: N084195
Client ID:Comments:
WEIEN01
Project: 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, CA QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
5/22/2026
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
4:31 PM
N084195-003B S3 5/21/2026 2:35:00 AM 6/2/2026 Soil MERCURY PREP WS-CA 6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 3050B Prep for Metals Soil WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS-CA6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
WS-CA
N084195-004A S4 5/21/2026 2:47:00 AM 6/2/2026 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction WS 6/2/2026 EPA 8082 PCBs BY GC/ECD WS
N084195-004B 6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 3050B Prep for Metals Soil WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS-CA6/2/2026 MERCURY PREP WS-CA6/2/2026 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS-CA
6/2/2026 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
WS-CA
N084195-005A FOLDER 6/2/2026 6/2/2026 Folder Folder LAB 6/2/2026 Folder Folder LAB
2 of 2 Page
Attachment "7"
1253
Item9.
Attachment "7"
1254
Item9.
Laboratory Name: Baseline Analytical Services
Address: P.O. Box 2243
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Telephone: (714) 273-2955
Authorized Signature
Name, Title (print) Brian Kato, Laboratory Director
Signature, Date
Laboratory Project Number: 26210
Client Name: Weis Environmental, LLC
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane
Project Address: 1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
Date(s) Sampled:
Date(s) Received:
Date(s) Reported:
Chain of Custody Received: Yes
Comments
California Regional Water Quality Control Board/DTSC
Laboratory Report Form (Cover Page 1 )
6/4/2026
6/3/2026
6/3/2026
Attachment "7"
1255
Item9.
Organic Analyses Number of Samples Number of Samples Subcontracted VOC's (EPA TO-15) 6
(Includes samples, duplicates & blanks)
Sample Condition: good
Inorganic Analyses Number of Samples Number of Samples Subcontracted Sample Condition:
Microbiological Analyses Number of Samples Number of Samples Subcontracted Sample Condition:
Other Types of Analyses Number of Samples
Sample Condition:
Laboratory Report Form (Cover Page 2 )
California Regional Water Quality Control Board/DTSC
Attachment "7"
1256
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) METHOD: EPA TO-15 MATRIX: Vapor REPORTING UNITS: g/m3
DATE ANALYZED: 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 Sample ID: SG1 SG2 SG3 SG4 SG4 DUP
DILUTION FACTOR: 1 1 1 1 1
ANALYTE MDL PQL
Benzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Ethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
t-Butanol (TBA) 50 100 ND ND ND ND ND
Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Ethyl t-Butyl Ether (ETBE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
t-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Ethanol 500 1000 ND ND ND ND ND
Acetone 200 400 ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK) 200 400 ND ND ND ND ND
n-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Isopropylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
p-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 200 400 ND ND ND ND ND
Naphthalene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
n-Propylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Styrene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Bromobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Bromochloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Bromomethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Chlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroform 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Chloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromomethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
ND: Not detected at the indicated method detection limit (MDL) CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS (Units: g/m3)
Attachment "7"
1257
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) METHOD: EPA TO-15 MATRIX: Vapor REPORTING UNITS: g/m3
DATE ANALYZED: 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26 Sample ID: SG1 SG2 SG3 SG4 SG4 DUP
DILUTION FACTOR: 1 1 1 1 1
ANALYTE MDL PQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Freon 113 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Tetrachloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Trichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Vinyl Chloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Isopropyl Alcohol 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND
Sample ID: SG1 SG2 SG3 SG4 SG4 DUP
Parameter: Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Recovery Units: % % % % %
Dibromofluoromethane 95 91 98 92 94
Toluene-D8 91 94 95 90 96
1-Bromo-2-Fluorobenzene 92 93 91 95 97
ND: Not detected at the indicated method detection limit (MDL) J: Value is below Practical Quantification Limit and above the Method Detection Limit (MDL) CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 4 70-130
70-130
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS (Units: g/m3)
Surrogate Acceptable
Range (%)
70-130
Attachment "7"
1258
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) METHOD: EPA TO-15 MATRIX: Vapor REPORTING UNITS: g/m3
DATE ANALYZED: 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26
Sample ID: Equipment
Blank
Method
Blank
DILUTION FACTOR: 1 1
ANALYTE MDL PQL
Benzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Toluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Ethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Total Xylenes 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND
t-Butanol (TBA) 50 100 ND ND
Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Ethyl t-Butyl Ether (ETBE) 1.0 2.0 ND ND
t-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Ethanol 500 1000 ND ND
Acetone 200 400 ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK) 200 400 ND ND
n-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Isopropylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
p-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 200 400 ND ND
Naphthalene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
n-Propylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Styrene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Bromobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Bromochloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Bromoform 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Bromomethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND
2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Chlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Chloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Chloroform 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Chloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Dibromomethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
ND: Not detected at the indicated method detection limit (MDL) CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS (Units: g/m3)
Attachment "7"
1259
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) METHOD: EPA TO-15 MATRIX: Vapor REPORTING UNITS: g/m3
DATE ANALYZED: 3-Jun-26 3-Jun-26
Sample ID: Equipment
Blank
Method
Blank
DILUTION FACTOR: 1 1
ANALYTE MDL PQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Freon 113 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Methylene Chloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Tetrachloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Trichloroethene 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Vinyl Chloride 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Isopropyl Alcohol 1.0 2.0 ND ND
Sample ID: Equipment
Blank
Method
Blank
Parameter: Recovery Recovery
Units: % %
Dibromofluoromethane 91 93
Toluene-D8 92 89
1-Bromo-2-Fluorobenzene 93 95
ND: Not detected at the indicated method detection limit (MDL) J: Value is below Practical Quantification Limit and above the Method Detection Limit (MDL) CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 6 70-130
70-130
70-130
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS (Units: g/m3)
Surrogate Acceptable
Range (%)
Attachment "7"
1260
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) II. A) Lab Control Sample (LCS)/Lab Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) Date Performed: Batch #: GCVOC1- 3-Jun-26 Method: TO-15 Instrument ID: GCVOC1 Units: g/L
LCS/LCSD
Analyte Sample Spike LCS LCS Spike LCSD LCSD RPD Recovery Result Conc. (g/L) Recovery Conc. (g/L) Recovery (%) Limits Limits (g/L) (%) (g/L) (%) (%) (%)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ND 10 9.6 96 10 9.4 94 3 65-130 0-15 Benzene ND 10 9.3 93 10 9.2 92 1 65-130 0-15
Trichloroethene ND 10 9.7 97 10 9.3 93 4 65-130 0-15
Toluene ND 10 9.0 90 10 9.2 92 3 65-130 0-15
Chlorobenzene ND 10 9.4 94 10 9.0 90 4 65-130 0-15
CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 7 3-Jun-26
QA/QC Report - Vapor Samples
Attachment "7"
1261
Item9.
Project Name: 1100 Hamilton Lane (MS Excel Duplicate of RWQCB LabForm10A; Ver12/96) (1) Chain-of-Custody Record (COC)
(2) Field Notes with Purge Time Calculations
CRWQCB-LA MAY 1996 GUIDEBOOK: ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORM FOR ORGANICS Page 8
ATTACHMENT
Attachment "7"
1262
Item9.
Weis Environmental, LLC Project Name: Page 1 of 1
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Project
Address:
Carlsbad, California 92008
Report to: Dan Weis Sampler: Brian Kato
Comments Sampling
Start Date
Sampling
Start Time
Sampling
End Date
Sampling
End Time Initial Final
Equipment Blank 06/03/26 10:30 AM 06/03/26 10:36 AM 19 --- 1.4 XX 1 -32 -5.5 SG1 06/03/26 10:45 AM 06/03/26 10:51 AM 11 --- 1.4 XX 2 -32 -6.2 SG2 06/03/26 11:05 AM 06/03/26 11:11 AM 08 --- 1.4 XX 3 -32 -4.6 SG3 06/03/26 11:25 AM 06/03/26 11:31 AM 22 --- 1.4 XX 4 -32 -6.3 SG4 06/03/26 11:40 AM 06/03/26 11:46 AM 12 --- 1.4 XX 5 -32 -5.0 SG4 DUP 06/03/26 11:52 AM 06/03/26 11:58 AM 16 --- 1.4 XX 6 -32 -5.8
1. Sampled and analyzed by: 2. Received by Turnaround Time:
Special Instructions/Notes:
Date/Time: Date/Times Above Signature: x________________________
3. Relinquished by 4. Received by
Date/Time: Date/Time:
Baseline Analytical Services
P. 0. Box 2243, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Telephone: (714) 273-2955 Signature: x________________________ Signature: x________________________ Signature: x________________________ Signature: x________________________ Client Information Project Information
Stainless Steel Canister ID (SSC-)Flow Controller ID (FC-) Analysis
Request
Sample ID
Lab Sample Number
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
RECORD
1100 Hamilton Lane
Canister Volume (L)VOC's (TO-15)Methane (ASTM D1946)
Laboratory Project #:
26210
Canister Vacuum ("Hg)
Attachment "7"
1263
Item9.
Field Notes Page 1 of 1
Client Information Project Information Baseline Analytical Information Weis Environmental, LLC Project Name: Analyst Name: Brian Kato 1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116 Project Address: Telephone: 714.273.2955 Carlsbad, California 92008
Report to: Dan Weis Start Date: 6/3/26 Email: [email protected] (1) Sampling Site Conditions: clear skies with no precipitation (2) Vapor Well Construction:
Pack Specification Tubing Specification:
cm
Diameter: 2.0 inches 5.08 cm Outer Diameter: 0.25 inches 0.635 Height: 1.0 feet 30.48 cm Inner Diameter: 0.19 inches 0.483 Material: sand & dry bentonite Lengths: 6' (includes above ground leads) (3) Purge Volume & Time Calculation
Component Diameter X-sect Length or Length or Volume Pack Volume Area Height Height X 0.35 Porosity (ml)
(cm) (cm2
) (ft) (cm) (ml) (ml)
5' bgs tubing 0.635 0.317 6.0 183 57.9 --- 174
Bentonite 5.08 20.26 1.0 30.5 617 216 648
Sand Pack 5.08 20.26 1.0 30.5 617 216 648
Total Pack Vol. --- --- --- --- --- --- 1297
Purge Time Calculation Purge flow rate (ml/min): 200
Purge Time for 3 Purge Volumes (min)
Total PV = Sand Pack Volume + 7.4
Tubing Volume
Porosity used for bentonite: 0.35
Purge Time = Total PV/Purge flow rate Total Pack volume equals sum of sand and bentonite pack volumes Purge Volume: Based on the 7/15/15 DTSC Soil Gas Advisory, remove 3 purge volumes prior to each sample collection (purge times shown above).
(4) Shut-In Test & Leak Detection
Comments/Observations/Special Instructions· Sampled and Analyzed by:
signature:______________________
Baseline Analytical Services
P. 0. Box 2243
Huntington Beach, California 92647 Phone: (714) 273-2955 Prior to each sampling, the shut-in test (per Soil Gas Advisory referenced above) was performed to insure the integrity of the sampling train. In addition, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was introduced as a leak detection compound adjacent to the sampling train and under the sampling shroud. IPA is included in the analysis compound list. 1100 Hamilton Lane
5' bgs
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido, California
A probe tip is set in a sand pack; the probe tip is attached to tubing that leads to the surface. The tubing ends are sealed with gas-tight plugs.
Volumes (3x)
Probe Depth
Attachment "7"
1264
Item9.
Attachment “8”
1 TRANSCRIPT OF A PORTION OF THE JUNE 10, 2026 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL
WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD MEETING
Beginning at timestamp 6:05
Heidi Whitman: Good morning. My name is Heidi Whitman. I live near the Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard cleanup site in Escondido. I’m here because the city of Escondido is currently considering a residential subdivision on Hamilton Lane within the Chatham groundwater and soil vapor plume. Over the past several weeks, I’ve been trying to ensure that the appropriate environmental agencies have had the opportunity to review the project materials before the city makes a final decision on the appeal. I contacted the Regional Water Board staff and was directed to DTSC due to the nature of the site and ongoing cleanup activities. DTSC has indicated they are reviewing the project materials.
I understand agency resources are limited, which is exactly why I’m here today. I’m asking for the appropriate environmental agencies to review the project before final approvals are granted.
My concern is that no site-specific groundwater, soil vapor, or contamination evaluation has been conducted for a project located within a historic contamination plume where cleanup objectives have not yet been met. Monitoring wells continue to detect chlorinated solvents throughout the plume area, including locations both near the source area and near residential neighborhoods and downgradient toward a public park. Recent monitoring reports show contamination rebounds in multiple wells including increases exceeding 70%, such as monitoring well 72, showing almost 17 times MCL for TCE.
Cleanup objectives established decades ago have still not been achieved. Despite those conditions, the City approved the project without requiring a site-specific groundwater, soil vapor, or hydrogeologic investigation of the property. I’m not asking the Water Board to take a position on the development itself. I am asking the agencies responsible for protecting groundwater and overseeing this cleanup be given the opportunity to review the project before irreversible decisions are made. When a project proposes stormwater infiltration within an active contamination plume, I believe agency review should occur before approval. Thank you for your time and for the work you do protecting water quality in our region.
Chair Strawn: Thank you, Ms. Whitman. I assume that staff has that under consideration. Thank you. Are there any other speakers this morning?
Executive Officer: Thank you, Chair Strawn. Sean McClain of our staff is available. But at this point in time what I would like to report to the Board is that we are aware of the concerns and are coordinating with DTSC which is the lead agency. And at this point in time, we will just simply 1265
Item9.
Attachment “8”
2 coordinate with them in terms of reviewing the issue. Mr. McClain, do you have anything to add?
Sean McClain: Yeah, Sean McClain, Senior Geologist in the Groundwater Programs. We did meet with DTSC on this project. DTSC is the lead on the Chatham Brother Barrel Yard site, uh, we looked at where the project is located. It is just downgradient of the Yard, but the groundwater contamination is no longer underneath that property. We see strong decreases in the shallow groundwater plume. The deeper plume is still there, and it’s still captured by some irrigation wells, but we have wellhead treatment on all those wells. So, at that time, we met with the City of San Diego, DTSC, nobody saw a threat to that project. And we concluded that it was a good project to be done.
Celeste Cantú: I have a question.
Sean McClain: Sure.
Celeste Cantú: I’m not sure I’m tracking the name here. Chatham Brothers Burial or Barrow? Sean McClain: Barrel.
Celeste Cantú: Barrel. Okay. And what was the industrial activity that took place there? Sean McClain: This is an old site from the 60s to 80s. This is where theyCeleste Cantú: That doesn’t seem that old.
Sean McClain: They had barrels, they were apparently a recycling company that took in chemicals from all kinds of companies. The County, DTSC, and the Water Board at that time had to come in and completely investigate this yard. They were dumping the chemicals in to shallow ponds, into groundwater wells on the property. It was a complete mess at the time. Since then, DTSC has enforced an enforcement action. They have a remedial action and they are doing groundwater extraction, solar vapor extraction, extensive soil removal on that property has occurred. But there is a downgradient plume that exists and it goes almost a mile long. It’s fractured bedrock, it’s very complex. Uh, the irrigation wells that are out there have captured that plume, have pulled it in different directions, which is something you typically don’t see too often. So, you know, looking at the most recent data, it does show that that shallow plume has pretty much attenuated and has gone away. The deeper plume is still here, and when I’m talking deep, we’re talking 500 feet, 1,000 feet. It’s very deep. And that’s because those water supply wells have pulled that plume into them. So, but we are seeing strong decreases in that plume. We don’t see the impacts to Felicita Park that is just downgradient as well. Um, it’s…it’s moving in the right direction.
Celeste Cantú: Thank you. The right direction is? I’m not quite sure what you mean, toward the ocean?
Sean McClain: Decreasing in the right direction. Going away. 1266
Item9.
Attachment “8”
3 Celeste Cantú: Oh, so it’s at the deeper level.
Sean McClain: At the shallow and deeper levels.
Celeste Cantú: Oh, at both. Okay, right. And what was the comp, what were the compounds? Sean McClain: TCE is the main compound, trichloroethylene.
Celeste Cantú: Yeah, great. Thank you.
Sean McClain: Sure.
Ending at timestamp 11:34
1267
Item9.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DECISION ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT AND REVISED MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT, AND
APPROVING A FIVE (5) LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP IN THE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE – 40,000 (RE-40) ZONE
WHEREAS, Robert D’Amaro (“Applicant”), filed a land use development application, Planning Case No. PL24-0067 (“Application”) constituting a request for a Tentative Subdivision Map for the subdivision of one existing lot into five (5) lots (“Project”) on a 6.02 gross acre site located at 0 Hamilton Lane (APN 238-360-68-00), with the Estate (E1) General Plan Land Use Designation, in the Residential Estate – 40,000 (RE-40) Zone; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026, the City of Escondido Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted on a motion to approve the resolution to approve the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Appellant, Heidi Whitman, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision in accordance with the Escondido Zoning Code (“Appeal”); and WHEREAS, the subject property is all that real property described in Exhibit "A”, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference as though fully set forth herein (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Application and Appeal were submitted to, and processed by, Planning Services of the Development Services Department in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Escondido 1268
Item9.
Zoning Code and the applicable procedures and time limits specified by the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code section 65920 et seq.) and the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, Tentative Subdivisions are permitted subject to review and approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map, subject to the rules and regulations of the California Subdivision and in accordance with Chapter 32 (Subdivisions) of the Escondido Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a Tentative Subdivision Map is required for the subdivision of one existing parcel into five (5) lots within the RE-40 zoning district; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 of California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.), the City is the Lead Agency for the Project, as the public agency with the principal responsibility for approving the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2007, the City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the originally proposed 5-Lot Subdivision Project on the site (City Log No. ER 2005-33); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an MND has been adopted, the lead agency is required to review any changed circumstances to whether any of the circumstances under Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, City staff evaluated the environmental impact of the proposed modification to the Project in light of the standards for subsequent environmental outlined in Public Resources Code Section 2166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162; and
1269
Item9.
WHEREAS, based on this evaluation, staff concluded that the MND had fully analyzed and mitigated, in compliance with CEQA, all potentially significant environmental impacts, if any, that would result from the Project modifications, that the impacts to the environment as a result of the modifications are consistent with and would not create substantial new or increased impacts beyond those that were evaluated in the MND, and that, therefore, no subsequent EIR or mitigated negative declaration is now required; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the proposed modifications to the Project, and to document staff’s evaluation of the environmental impact of said modifications, Applicant prepared Addendum #1 to the MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum need not be circulated for public review; and
WHEREAS, Planning Services studied the Application and Appeal, performed necessary investigations, prepared a written report, and hereby recommends denial of the appeal of the decision of Planning Commission on April 28, 2026 to approve the Project, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, City staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with City and State public noticing requirements; and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City Council received and considered the reports and recommendation of Planning Services and gave all persons full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and testimony regarding the Project. Evidence was submitted to and considered by the City Council, including, without limitation:
1270
Item9.
a. Written information including plans, studies, written and graphical information, and other material, submitted by the Applicant;
b. Oral testimony from City staff, interested parties, and the public; c. The staff report, dated April 28, 2026, with its attachments as well as City staff’s recommendation on the Project, which is incorporated herein as though fully set forth herein; and d. Additional information submitted during the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the public hearing before the City Council was conducted in all respects as required by the Escondido Municipal Code and the rules of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Escondido, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. The City Council, in its independent judgement, has determined the Project to have no new significant environmental impacts and no increase in severity of impacts previously identified in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, and therefore an Addendum to the MND is sufficient in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, and in accordance generally with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq.). The City Council has reviewed and considered the adopted MND and First Addendum attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, including the revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit “D”, prepared for the Project and finds that those documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all the environmental impacts associated with the revised Project. The City Council further finds that the Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State 1271
Item9.
CEQA Guidelines, and that the findings related to the MND and First Addendum, taken together reflect the City Council’s independent judgement.
3. Based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the First Addendum, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred, specifically:
a. There are no substantial changes proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. b. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous environmental document was adopted, that shows any of the following:
i. The project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous environmental document;
1272
Item9.
ii. Significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the previous environmental document; iii. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous environmental document would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
4. After consideration of all evidence presented, and studies and investigations made by the City Council and on its behalf, the City Council makes the following substantive findings and determinations and affirms the decision of the Planning Commission, attached hereto as Exhibit “E,” relating to the information that has been considered. In accordance with the Findings of Fact and the foregoing, the City Council reached a recommendation on the matter as hereinafter set forth.
5. The Application to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the Project, subject to each and all of the conditions hereinafter set forth in Exhibit “F”, is hereby denied and the Project remains approved as conditioned. The City Council expressly declares that it would not have approved this Application except upon and subject to each and all of said conditions, each and all of which shall run with the land and be binding upon the Applicant, the owner, and all subsequent owners of the Property, and all persons who use the Property for the use permitted hereby. 1273
Item9.
6. The development plansfor the Project are on file in Planning Services of the Development Services Department and are available for inspection by anyone interested herein, and the development plans are incorporated herein by this reference as if they were fully set forth herein. The Project is conditionally approved as set forth on the Application and Project drawings, all designated as approved by City Council, and which shall not be altered without the express authorization by Planning Services.
Any deviations from the approved development plans shall be reviewed by the City for substantial compliance and may require amendment by the appropriate hearing body.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to Government Code section 66020(d)(1):
1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Project is subject to dedications, reservations, and exactions, as specified in the Conditions of Approval. The Project is subject to certain fees described in the City of Escondido’s Development Fee Inventory on file in both the Development Services and Public Works Departments. The Applicant shall be required to pay all development fees of the City then in effect at the time and in such amounts as may prevail when building permits are issued. It is the City’s intent that the costs representing future development’s share of public facilities and capital improvements be imposed to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. The Applicant is advised to review the Planned Fee Updates portion of the web page, www.escondido.gov, and regularly monitor and/or review fee-related information to plan for the costs associated with undertaking the Project.
2. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the 90-day period during which to protest the imposition of any fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this Resolution begins on the effective date of this Resolution, and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Government Code section 66020.
1274
Item9.
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13268, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 10, 1984.
APN: 238-360-68-00
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "A"
1275
Item9.
M A S S O N
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PREPARED BY:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ROBERT D'AMARO
LEE DURAN DATE
11/6/2025
11/6/2025
DATE
Exhibit B
Exhibit "B"
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "B"
5 1276
Item9.
’
M A S S O N
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PREPARED BY:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Exhibit B
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "B"
5 1277
Item9.
P. 760.741.3570
F. 760.741.1786
www.masson-assoc.com
Planning Engineering Surveying Telecom
1120 Sycamore Ave Suite 2D
Vista, CA 92081
M A S S O N
& A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PREPARED BY:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "B"
1278
Item9.
M A S S O N
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PREPARED BY:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Exhibit B
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "B"
5 1279
Item9.
HV 5
HV 1
V 2
HV 3
642.97
650.38
.32
650.72
/
/
//
/
/
635
635
640
640
640
640
640
645
650
645
645
645
650
645
650
645
650
645
650
650
645
650
645
650
650
645
655
655
660
655
660
660
655
655
655
660
655
660
660
665
655
650
655
645
650
660
660
655
655
655
660
655
645
650
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
EX. 12" CML&C WATER
3" HP GAS
2" HP GAS
EX. 16" CML&C WATER
D-2
CURB LINE
TYPE B
CURB LINE
D-2
TYPE B
D-2
CURB LINE
TYPE B
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
C.O.S.D.
C.O.E.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
O
AN DIE
ESCONDID ESCON
AN DIE
E O
AN DIE
ES O ID
OAK
20"
OAK
18"
OAK
16"
OAK
18"
OLIVE
18"
OLIVE
16"
COUN
CITY
UN
OAK Y
OAK
8"
OAK
6"
OAK
6"
OAK
12"
OAK
20"
6 / W
URB C LINE
TY
6 655
660
645
650
50 ON
DO NDI O OF E
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
LOT 5
BOTTOM AREA = 6,753 SF
654.50
PAD
642.00
PAD
636.00
BASIN
654.00
PAD
655.00
PAD
658.00
PAD
648.99TC
PROGRESS PRINT DATE
CHANGES
DESIGNDRAWNCHECKEDSCALE
PROJECT
SHEET
OF 1 SHEET
L-1
PROJECT CLIENT
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE990 SEACOAST DRIVE, STE. 20IMPERIAL BEACH, CA 91932(619) 882-2499E-mail:georgemercerassociates@gmail .com GEORGE MERCER ASSOCIATES INC.
GMGM
IF PLAN IS LESS THAN 24" X 36"
IT IS A REDUCED PRINT.
REDUCE SCALE ACCORDINGLY.
HAMILTON BERNARDO LLC
NORTH
TENTATIVE MAP
SE CORNER LOT
BERNARDO AVE & HAMILTON LANE
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
24-009
1"= 40'
5/23/24 PROGRESS
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CALIFORN IA
George E.L. Mercer No. 4055
Signature
Renewal Date: 4-30-27
Date:
11/6/25
6/15/24 PROGRESS9/16/25 PROGRESS11/6/25 PROGRESS
MULCHED
MULCHED
MULCHED
MULCHED
UNDISTURBED
UNDISTURBED
UNDISTURBED
UNDISTURBED
RELOCATE BOULDERS TO CREATE ENTRY
FEATURES OF BOULDERS AND OAKS
CITY REQUIRED STREET TREES.
INFORMAL NATURAL GROUPINGSRATHER THAN EVERY 30'
ADJUST GRADING TO PRESERVE THISGROUP OF BOULDERS.ADD THREE NEW OAK TREES TO ACCENTUATE THIS SCENIC KNOLL.INCLUDE A PATH AND SEATING
AREA AMONG THE BOULDERS
PRESERVE THIS ATTRACTIVE
AREA OF OAKS AND BOULDERSINCLUDE A PATH AND SEATING
AREA AMONG THE BOULDERS
LOT 5:PRESERVE THIS ATTRACTIVE
OAK AND BOULDER GROUPINGS.
LESS IMPORTANT, BUT COULD
ATTEMPT TO KEEP TWO OLIVES TOO.
GRADE DRIVEWAY AT 10%
BIOBASIN:PLANT WITH NATIVE FLOWERINGWETLAND SPECIES TO
CREATE ATTRACTIVE"RAIN GARDEN"
PATH TO SEATING OVERLOOK
"RAIN GARDEN"
EXISTING BOULDERS TOBE RELOCATED SHOWN DASHED
LEGEND
40 0 40 80 120
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 40'
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
CITY APPROVED STREET TREE SUCH AS: AGONIS FLEXUOSA - PEPPERMINT TREE
CERCIS 'FOREST PANSY' - REDBUD
RHUS LANCEA - AFRICAN SUMAC UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA - CALIFORNIA LAUREL NATIVE OAKS SUCH AS: QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK QUERCUS LOBATA - VALLEY OAK
QUERCUS DOUGLASII - BLUE OAK
SLOPE TREES SUCH AS:
RHUS LANCEA - AFRICAN SUMAC SCHINUS MOLLE - CALIFORNIA PEPPER TREES AT BIOBASIN SUCH AS: CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS - REDBUD JUGLANS MEXICAN - MEXICAN ELDER PLATANUS RACEMOSA - CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE SALIX LASIOLEPIS - ARROYO WILLOW SAMBUCUS MEXICANA - BLUE ELDERBERRY SLOPE PLANTING: ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'HOWARD MCMINN' - MANZANITA CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA - BUSH ANEMONE FREMONTEDENDRON CALIFORNICUM - FLANNEL BUSH
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA - TOYON MYRICA CALIFORNICA - PACIFIC WAX MYRTLE BACCHARIS 'PIGEON POINT' - PROSTRATE COYOTE BUSH
CEANOTHUS 'YANKEE POINT' - CARMEL CREEPER DIPLACUS LONGIFLORUS - MONKEY FLOWER EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICA - CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA ERIOGONUM GRANDE SSP. RUBESCENS - RED BUCKWHEATBIOBASIN/RAIN GARDENPLANTING:
CAREX SPECIES - SEDGES
HEUCHERA HYBRIDS - CORAL BELLS/ALUM ROOT IRIS DOUGLAISIANA - PACIFIC COAST IRIS IVA HAYESIANA - POVERTY WEED DIPLACUS LONGIFLORUS - MONKEY FLOWERPAD AREA AND OTHER FLAT AREAS: 3" ORGANIC MULCH FOR EROSION CONTROL NATIVE/NATURALIZED GRASSLANDS TO REMAIN. PROVIDE IRRIGATION AND BRUSH MANAGEMENTWHERE REQUIRED BY FIRE MARSHALL.
HYDROSEED WITH NATIVE SEED MIX AT ANY AREA
DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN WITH SPECIES NOTED PROTECT IN PLACE*EXISTING BOULDERS TO REMAININ CURRENT LOCATIONEXISTING LOCATION OF BOUDERS TO BE RELOCATEDNEW LOCATION OF BOULDERS TOBE RELOCATED* ALL EXISTING OAK TREEES ARE TO BE RETAINED, PROTECTED IN PLACE.
IF ANY EXISTING OAK TREES ARE TO BE MOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AN ADDITIONAL 24" BOX OAK TREE SHALL ALSO BE PLANTED AS MITIGATION.
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE RELATED CITY AND REGIONAL STANDARDSMINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCETRAFFIC SIGNALS / STOP SIGNS - 20 FEET UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES - 5 FEET (10' FOR SEWER)
ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES - 10 FEETDRIVEWAY (ENTRIES) - 10 FEETINTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTING CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS) - 25 FEET IRRIGATIONAN AUTOMATIC, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, DISEASE-RESISTANT CONDITION. THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR THE VEGETATION SELECTED.
MAINTENANCEALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTYOWNER(S). LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREAS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.
THE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF DEBRIS AND LITTER, AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. DISEASED OR DEAD PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SATISFACTORILYTREATED OR REPLACED.
H A M I L T O N L A N E
B E R N A R D O A V E
D.G. WALKWAY MEANDERS THROUGH
STREET TREES ARRANGED IN INFORMALGROUPINGS
MIN.SIZE15 GAL.15 GAL.15 GAL15 GAL.5 GAL.1 GAL.
QUANTITY/
SPACING
41 9
16 8
8' O.C.
MIN.
18" O.C.
NOTES1.2.3.4.5.
Exhibit BExhibit B
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "B"
1280
Item9.
INITIAL STUDY ADDENDUM
City of Escondido, California
1. PROJECT TITLE: Hamilton Bernardo Tentative Tract Map Project
2. LEAD AGENCY & ADDRESS: City of Escondido; 201 North Broadway; Escondido, CA 92025
3. CONTACT PERSON & PHONE: Melissa DiMarzo, Assistant Planner II
4. PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located southeast of the Hamilton Lane/Bernardo Avenue intersection and comprises 6.02 gross acres in the City of Escondido (Assessor Parcel Number 238-360- 68-00).
5. PROJECT SPONSOR & ADDRESS: Hamilton Bernardo LLC
PO Box 1795
La Jolla, CA 92038
Lee Duran
858-699-9311
6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Estate 1
7. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential Estate (RE)-40
8. SURROUNDING LAND USES & PROJECT SETTING:
The project site is vacant. An existing single-family residence is located adjacent to and south of Lot 2 and east of the proposed stormwater biofiltration basin in unincorporated San Diego County. Adjacent land to the west is zoned RE-40. Unincorporated San Diego County is located to the north, east and south. Surrounding land use is single-family residential development.
9. SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL PROJECT:
The original project was a Subdivision Map consisting of 5 single-family residential lots on minimum 40,000 square foot lots and associated public infrastructure improvements such as circulation, storm drains, and water and sewer lines. The project would include grading to create the proposed private street and home building sites. No grading exemptions are required. The approximately 6.28-acre site is comprised of one Assessor Parcel Number (238-360-6800) connecting to and fronting on both Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane. The proposed project is located in an area composed of a mix of established residential development, newer housing tracts and some remaining vacant parcels.
The City of Escondido prepared and adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Case Number ER 2005-33, TR 931, 2005-46-PZ, 2005-06 AN. The Initial Study was circulated for public review from March 22, 2007 to April 11, 2007. The Initial Study determined that no significant impacts to the environment would occur with implementation of the proposed annexation and subdivision map. The following mitigation measures were identified and incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).
Air Quality
Impact. The project will potentially impact air quality in the area surrounding the project during construction.
Mitigation. Prior to construction and issuance of grading and building permits, a site-specific analysis shall be prepared to determine equipment and methods necessary to protect adjacent properties.
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1281
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -2- City of Escondido, California Biological Resources
Impact. The project will have a direct impact on 3.06 acres of non-native grasslands.
Mitigation. The proposed mitigation ratio is 0.25:1 for direct impacts through the purchase of habitat credits from an approved mitigation bank (BIO-1).
Impact. Project will have a direct impact on .02 acres of Coast Sage Scrub. U.S. Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Game approval required.
Mitigation. The proposed mitigation ratio is 1:1 for direct impacts through the purchase of habitat credits from an approved mitigation bank (BIO-2).
Impact. The project will require the removal of four individual oak trees to develop the residential lots within the subdivision.
Mitigation. Impacts to native Live Oak trees will be mitigated by relocating the four Live Oaks on-site and planting four new Live Oak trees on-site (BIO-3).
Impact. The project will remove four individual oak trees to develop the residential lots within the subdivision.
Mitigation. A qualified biologist must inspect trees for nests prior to any brushing, grading, tree relocation or construction within close proximity to, or within the existing Oaks discussed in the Biological Report's addendum of 2/14/07. If any active nests of sensitive species are found, no impacts will be allowed until all young have fledged (BIO-4).
Impact. Oak trees planted as part of the replacement program must be monitored to ensure viability.
Mitigation. The applicant shall provide funding to the satisfaction of the City for the five-year monitoring of the oak trees with sufficient reserve for the replacement of any dead/dying stock (BIO-5).
Hazardous Materials
Impact. Project is near the Chatham Barrel Yard (a Superfund Cleanup Site). The project site has one County Monitoring well to that is to remain.
Mitigation. Monitoring well MW57 is to remain onsite and be accessible to the Chatham Brothers RP Group for monitoring purposes until officially released. Upon release, it is to be removed per Regional Board and City of Escondido standards. Alternately, if a new replacement well is installed nearby and approved by the Regional Board and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), existing well MW57 can also then be released and removed per Regional Board and City of Escondido standards.
This well was decommissioned as documented in a letter provided by Chatham Site PRP Group dated May 21, 2009. This mitigation measure has been satisfied.
Hydrology/Water Quality
Impact. Project is near the Chatham Barrel Yard (a Superfund Cleanup Site). The project site has one County Monitoring well that is to remain.
Mitigation. No drinking water wells are to be drilled on-site and no excavations shall be allowed on-site without proper permits (HYD-1).
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1282
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -3- City of Escondido, California Proposed Project
The project applicant is seeking entitlement approval from the City of Escondido for a Tentative Tract Map subdividing an existing 6.02 gross/5.95 net acre parcel into five single-family residential estate lots and one stormwater detention basin lot. The applicant is requesting the following entitlement approvals:
- PL24-0067
Hamilton Bernardo, LLC, (applicant) submitted a proposal to the City of Escondido for approval of a subdivision to create five single-family estate lots and one lot for the construction of a stormwater biofiltration basin. The proposed single-family residential lots would be a minimum of 40,000 square feet and accommodate one single-family residence with related improvements. Primary access would be from Hamilton Lane with secondary emergency vehicle access (EVA) from Bernardo Avenue. Potable water would be provided by the City of Escondido Water Department. Sewer conveyance and treatment and public services (i.e., fire, police and stormwater) would be provided by the City of Escondido.
School services would be provided by the Escondido Union School District. Grading would require cut/fill of 8,700 cubic yards. Grading spoils would be balanced on-site. Construction would begin in mid2026 and be completed in 2027.
10. OTHER REQUIRED AGENCY APPROVALS:
None required.
11. HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES TRADITIONALLY & CULTURALLY AFFILIATED
WITH THE PROJECT AREA REQUESTED CONSULTATION PER PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.3.1? IF SO, IS THERE A PLAN FOR CONSULTATION THAT INCLUDES, FOR
EXAMPLE, THE DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS TO TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES, PROCEDURE REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY, ETC.?
The proposed project will disturb native soils during site preparation and grading. Approval of the project would incorporate conditions of approval to address potential adverse effects to Cultural Resources and/or Tribal Cultural Resources during construction. The 2007 Initial Study was prepared prior to adoption of AB 52; thus, while tribal cultural resources are addressed herein, no consultation with Native American Tribes per AB52 is required.
12. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/ADDENDUM:
As stated, the City previously prepared and adopted an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for Case Number ER 2005-33, TR 931, 2005-46-PZ, 2005-06, dated March 21, 2007.. Based on all available information and in light of the entire record, the analysis in this Addendum, and pursuant to Sections 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City has determined the following
1. There are no substantial changes proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous environmental document due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous environmental Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1283
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -4- City of Escondido, California document was certified as complete or was adopted, shows any of the following:
A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration;
B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration;
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Per Section 15164 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the lead agency has prepared an addendum to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration because, while some changes or additions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration were necessary, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
Based upon review of the current project, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines apply. No changes in circumstances have occurred, and no new information of substantial importance has manifested, which would result in new significant or substantially increased adverse impacts as a result of the project. As stated, pursuant to Section 15164, , this Addendum has been prepared to document minor technical changes or additions to the Project.
4. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The project would not affect any environmental factors resulting in a Potentially Significant Impact or Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated. A summary of the environmental factors potentially affected by this project, consisting of a Potentially Significant Impact or Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated, include:
Aesthetics Agriculture & Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population / Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Finding of Significance Greenhouse Gas Emissions Wildfire Energy
DETERMINATION. (To be completed by lead agency) Based on this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been included in this project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1284
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -5- City of Escondido, California I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An Addendum is being prepared to address minor changes to the project. Nothing further is required.
Melissa DiMarzo, Assistant Planner II
5. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analyses,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Melissa DiMarzo
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1285
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -6- City of Escondido, California
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1286
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -7- City of Escondido, California Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant No Impact
14.1 AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway?
c. In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
2007 Initial Study
The proposed map is not located on a Ridgeline identified in the Community Open Space/Conservation Element of the General Plan. No Grading exemptions are being requested in conjunction with this tentative map. The highest fill proposed on the site is approximately 10 feet in height, consistent with the maximum height allowed in the City's Grading Ordinance. It is located along one pad area in the far northeastern corner of the project. The deepest proposed cut areas are up to 6 feet deep, with a maximum of 20 feet being allowed in the Grading Ordinance. The largest cuts are located within the north-central portion of the site.
These proposed cuts and fills are at a 2:1 ratio, also consistent with the Grading Ordinance. These proposed slopes are considered minor in nature by the Code and will not block significant views.
Residential projects typically do not directly illuminate or reflect glare upon adjacent properties, therefore no significant light or glare impact would result from the proposed project. Development of the proposed future development will not obstruct scenic views or vistas open to the public since neither the City nor the State designates Hamilton Lane or Bernardo Avenue as a scenic resources.
Proposed Project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant Impact. The project would approve five new single-family estate lots and one lot to accommodate a stormwater bioretention basin. The site is currently vacant and comprised of rolling terrain with several granite boulder clusters. As stated, the site is zoned RE-40 and surrounded by existing singlefamily residential development. New residential lots would be planned and residences constructed consistent with City of Escondido Zoning Code (Chapter 33) Article 6 (Residential Zones), and Article 64 (Design Review).
The General Plan Conservation Element notes that hillsides and ridgelines provide a visual resource and aesthetic value to Escondido that contributes to the community’s sense of identity. These areas are located to the west and east of the site (see Conservation Element, Figure VII-5). The project site does not have any designated scenic features and while the project would change existing views into the site; the site is not a scenic vista. The proposed project would not further obstruct existing public views of hillsides and ridgelines; Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1287
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -8- City of Escondido, California thus, the approved project would not result in adverse effects to scenic resources identified in the General Plan. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. No officially designated state scenic highways exist within City limits. Additionally, the City’s General Plan Resource Conservation Element does not identify any local scenic roadways (City of Escondido 2012). Grading would likely remove or relocate existing vegetation and boulders; however, no impact within a state scenic highway corridor would occur. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. Scenic quality is governed by the City’s Zoning Code and General Plan. As discussed under response (a), the proposed project would not result in an adverse effect to a scenic vista as defined in the City’s General Plan. As indicated above, the project site does not have any designated scenic features and while the project would change existing views into the site; the site is not a scenic vista. The proposed project would not further obstruct existing public views of hillsides and ridgelines; thus, the approved project would not result in adverse effects to scenic resources identified in the General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. The project is within an urbanized area and it would not conflict with applicable RE-40 zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. There are two primary artificial sources of light that generally affect an urban environment: light emanating from building interiors that passes through windows to the outside and light from exterior sources (e.g., street lighting, parking lot lighting, building illumination, security lighting, and landscape lighting) that affect the natural ambient light level. The introduction of light can affect adjacent areas and diminish night sky views depending on the location of the light sources and proximity to nearby light-sensitive areas.
Glare can be caused by unshielded or misdirected lighting sources. Reflective surfaces such as chrome or polished metal can also be a source of glare. Glare results from development and associated parking areas that contain reflective materials such as hi-efficiency window glass, highly polished surfaces and expanses of pavement. The Project site is in a developed area with predominantly single-family uses. The existing lighting in the project area includes streetlights and vehicle lights within the adjacent roadway corridors and interior and exterior building lighting from developed parcels proximal to the site.
Proposed lighting is anticipated to include a combination of street and security lighting. City of Escondido Zoning Code Article 35 addresses the use of light fixtures on residential properties to minimize the amount of light cast on adjoining properties and public right-of-way. During construction, lights may be used within the construction areas, notably the construction staging areas, to provide security for construction equipment and construction materials. Further, in the event that construction-related activities occur during nighttime hours, temporary, overhead artificial lighting would be provided to illuminate the work area. Compliance with applicable lighting regulations and standards would reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1288
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -9- City of Escondido, California Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Initial Study. The project would not result in any new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Initial Study result. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mit. Less than Significant Impact No Impact
14.2 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as depicted on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 2007 Initial Study
The project site is not in agricultural production and is not listed as Prime Agricultural Land as identified in the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared for the City's most recent General Plan revisions in 2012.
The California Department of Conservation, which publishes farmland conservation reports, classifies the site as "Urban and Built-up Land" which is defined as:
" ... land occupied by structures with a building density of at least one unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately six structures to a 10-acre parcel, including residential, industrial, commercial, institutional facilities, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, and water control structures.
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"
1289
Item9.
Initial Study Addendum -10- City of Escondido, California The development of residential lots and natural vegetated lands to remain; would therefore, not result in significant individual or cumulative impacts to agricultural resources.
Proposed Project
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. The site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Construction of the proposed project would not convert farmland to non-agricultural use Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The proposed project is located in an area zoned to accommodate the existing use. Agricultural designations do not occur within the project area and no Williamson Act contracts apply. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in any conflicts with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract. No impact would occur. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
No Impact. The project site is neither zoned for agricultural use, nor subject to a Williamson Act contract.
Approval of the proposed project would have no impact on existing agricultural zoning or to land under a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The project site is not zoned as forest land or timberland or for Timberland Production nor do these uses occur on the site. No impact would occur. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project site does not contain forested areas or designated forest land. The proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur. Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project site is not located on a site dedicated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in changes in the environment that would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. No impact would occur.
Impacts would be consistent with those identified in the 2007 Initial Study.
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Initial Study. The project would not result in any new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Initial Study result. .
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"