Escondido City Council
August 5, 2026

1666
Item9.
171 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: rr-RCRA TSD-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes NonCorrective Action sites that have indicated engagement in the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which requires a RCRA hazardous waste permit.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Generator List: rr-RCRA LQG-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA SQG-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Non-Generators: rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb
RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
RCRA Sites with Controls: rr-RCRA CONTROLS-bb
List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle-to-grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non-hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances.

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024
Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: rr-FED ENG-bb
List of Engineering controls (ECs) made availabe by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ECs encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. The EC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place.

Government Publication Date: Jan 29, 2025

RCRA TSD

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG

RCRA VSQG

RCRA NON GEN

RCRA CONTROLS

FED ENG
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1667
Item9.
172 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: rr-FED INST-bb
List of Institutional controls (ICs) made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ICs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. The IC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place.

Government Publication Date: Jan 29, 2025
Land Use Control Information System: rr-LUCIS-bb
The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States.

Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006
Institutional Control Boundaries at NPL sites: rr-NPL IC-bb These boundaries of Institutional Control areas at sites on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL), or as Proposed or Deleted, are sourced from the EPA NPL Superfund Site Boundaries dataset, refreshed by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). The EPA's NPL includes the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments such as administrative and legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Data provided by external parties is not independently verified by EPA. This boundary data is made available to the public strictly for informational purposes.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1982-1986
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1987-1989
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS-bb
Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2024
The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This data is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and includes Brownfield sites from the Cleanups in My Community (CIMC) web application.

Government Publication Date: Feb 7, 2024
FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: rr-FEMA UST-bb
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017

FED INST
LUCIS
NPL IC
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

FEMA UST
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1668
Item9.
173 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Facility Response Plan: rr-FRP-bb
This listing contains facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRPs) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit FRPs. Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. This listing includes FRP facilities from an applicable EPA FOIA file and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) data file.

Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024
Delisted Facility Response Plans: rr-DELISTED FRP-bb
Facilities that once appeared in - and have since been removed from - the list of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA.

Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments.

Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2024
Historical Gas Stations: rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb
This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930.

Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930
Petroleum Refineries: rr-REFN-bb
This list of petroleum refineries is sourced from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Refinery Capacity Report. The listing includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year. The geographic area the report covers is the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Per the EIA, the facility location data represents the approximate location based on research of publicly available information from sources such as Federal agencies, company websites, and satellite images on public websites.

Government Publication Date: Oct 31, 2024
Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb A list of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), as well as petroleum terminals sourced from Oak Ridge National Laboratory hosted by the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Database. Data includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil with activity between 2017 and 2018. EIA petroleum product terminal data comes from the EIA815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings.

Government Publication Date: Oct 31, 2024
LIEN on Property: rr-SEMS LIEN-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides Lien details on applicable properties, such as the Superfund lien on property activity, the lien property information, and the parties associated with the lien.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
Superfund Decision Documents: rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb
This database contains a list of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include completed Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD) for active and archived sites stored in the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
State
State Response Sites: rr-RESPONSE-bb
A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database serves a purpose similar to that of the federal NPL, functioning as a state-level counterpart for prioritizing cleanup efforts at hazardous substance release sites.

Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
FRP

DELISTED FRP

HIST GAS STATIONS
REFN

BULK TERMINAL

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD

RESPONSE
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1669
Item9.
174 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 EnviroStor Database: rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb
The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database serves a purpose similar to that of the federal Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), functioning as a state-level counterpart for tracking potential hazardous substance release sites.

Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
Delisted State Response Sites: rr-DELISTED ENVS-bb
Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2025
Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): rr-SWF/LF-bb
The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites.

Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2024
Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels: rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit.

Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006
Waste Management Unit Database: rr-WMUD-bb
The Waste Management Unit Database System tracks and inventories waste management units. CCR Title 27 contains criteria stating that Waste Management Units are classified according to their ability to contain wastes. Containment shall be determined by geology, hydrology, topography, climatology, and other factors relating to the ability of the Unit to protect water quality. Water Code Section 13273.1 requires that operators submit a water quality solid waste assessment test (SWAT) report to address leak status. The WMUDS was last updated by the State Water Resources control board in 2000.

Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2000
EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities: rr-HWP-bb
A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database.

Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report: rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995
Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers: rr-C&D DEBRIS RECY-bb This listing of Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers is maintained by the California Intergrated Waste Management Board-common C&D materials include lumber, drywall, metals, masonry (brick, concrete, etc.), carpet, plastic, pipe, rocks, dirt, paper, cardboard, or green waste related to land development.

Government Publication Date: Jun 20, 2018
Recycling Centers: rr-RECYCLING-bb
This list of Certified Recycling Centers that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Listing of Certified Processors: rr-PROCESSORS-bb
This list of Certified Processors that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF

SWRCB SWF
WMUD
HWP
SWAT

C&D DEBRIS RECY

RECYCLING

PROCESSORS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1670
Item9.
175 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Listing of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs: rr-CONTAINER RECY-bb This list of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs (non-buyback) operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Land Disposal Sites: rr-LDS-bb
Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports: rr-LUST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED LST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures.

Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2025
Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker: rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Nov 17, 2024
Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases: rr-UST CLOSURE-bb This listing includes Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases which are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board at a Future Board Meeting or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period, and Closure of UST Cases with Closure Denials and Approved Orders. The lists are provided by the California Water Boards.

Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2025
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database: rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker.

Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System: rr-UST SWEEPS-bb The Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS) is a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).

Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 1994
Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST-bb
A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM.

Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009
SWRCB Historical Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST SWRCB-bb A list of aboveground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Effective January 1, 2008, the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs) are vested with the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA).

Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2007

CONTAINER RECY
LDS
LUST

DELISTED LST
UST

UST CLOSURE
HHSS

UST SWEEPS
AST

AST SWRCB
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1671
Item9.
176 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Oil and Gas Facility Tanks: rr-TANK OIL GAS-bb
Locations of oil and gas tanks that fall under the jurisdiction of the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (CalGEM) (CCR 1760). CalGEM was formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR).

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2025
Delisted Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED TNK-bb
This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM).

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2025
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-CERS TANK-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-DELISTED CTNK-bb This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal.

Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary: rr-HIST TANK-bb The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated.

Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions: rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions.

Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
CALSITES Database: rr-CALSITES-bb
This historical database was maintained by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for more than a decade. CALSITES contains information on Brownfield properties with confirmed or potential hazardous contamination. In 2006, DTSC introduced EnviroStor as the latest Brownfields site database.

Government Publication Date: May 1, 2004
Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions: rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.

Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2021
Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions: rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials.

Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
Voluntary Cleanup Program: rr-VCP-bb
List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services.

TANK OIL GAS

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK
LUR

CALSITES
HLUR
DEED
VCP
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1672
Item9.
177 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
GeoTracker Cleanup Program Sites: rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb
A list of Cleanup Program sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Delisted Cleanup Program Sites: rr-DELISTED CLEANUP-bb
A list of Cleanup Program sites which were once included - and have since been removed from - the list of Cleanup Program Sites in GeoTracker.

GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
Delisted County Records: rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb
Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds.

Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Tribal
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN LUST-bb This list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN UST-bb This list of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian LUST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-bb Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian UST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2024
County
San Diego County - Solid Waste Facility List: rr-SWF SANDIEGO-bb This list of open and closed Solid Waste Facilities is made available by the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health and Quality's (DEHQ) agency files and map service. The County of San Diego DEHQ Solid Waste Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) is certified by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to enforce state solid waste laws and regulations in San Diego County, excluding the City of San Diego.

Government Publication Date: Sep 24, 2024
San Diego County - Local Oversight Program List: rr-LOP SANDIEGO-bb A list of Underground Storage Tank (UST) release sites in the County of San Diego. This list is made available by San Diego County Department of Environmental Health.

Government Publication Date: Jun 15, 2020

CLEANUP SITES

DELISTED CLEANUP

DELISTED COUNTY

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED INDIAN LST

DELISTED INDIAN UST

SWF SANDIEGO

LOP SANDIEGO
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1673
Item9.
178 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 San Diego County - Hazardous Materials Management Division Database: rr-HAZ SANDIEGO-bb A list of facilities with Unified Program Facility Permit in San Diego County. This list has been made available by County of San Diego Environmental Health.

Government Publication Date: Jul 19, 2024
San Diego County - UST List: rr-UST SANDIEGO-bb
A list of registered Underground Storage Tanks in the County of San Diego. The list is made available by the San Diego County Hazardous Materials Division.

Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2024
San Diego County - Site Assessment and Mitigation Investigation Sites: rr-SAM SANDIEGO-bb List of sites which have undergone a Site Assessment and Mitigation investigation. This list is made available by the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health.

Government Publication Date: Apr 26, 2024
Additional Environmental Record Sources
Federal
PFAS Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data: rr-PFAS GHG-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) collects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) data from large emitting facilities (25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year), and suppliers of fossil fuels and industrial gases that results in GHG emissions when used. Includes GHG emissions data for facilities that emit or have emitted since 2010 chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures by DSSTox. PFAS emissions data has been identified for facilities engaged in the following industrial processes: Aluminum Production (GHGRP Subpart F), HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 Destruction (Subpart O), Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I), Fluorinated Gas Production (Subpart L), Magnesium Production (Subpart T), Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use (Subpart DD), and Manufacture of Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment (Subpart SS). Over time, other industrial processes with required GHGRP reporting may include PFAS emissions data and the list of reportable gases may change over time.

Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2024
On-Scene Coordinator Response Sites: rr-OSC RESPONSE-bb This list of On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) Response Sites is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OSCs are the federal officials responsible for monitoring or directing responses to all oil spills and hazardous substance releases reported to the federal government. OSCs coordinate all federal efforts with, and provide support and information to local, state, and regional response communities. An OSC is an agent of either EPA or the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), depending on where the incident occurs. EPA's OSCs have primary responsibility for spills and releases to inland areas and waters. USCG OSCs have responsibility for coastal waters and the Great Lakes. In general, an OSC has the following key responsibilities during and after a response: Assessment, Monitoring, Response Assistance, and Evaluation.

Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2024
Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Aug 1, 2024
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: rr-TRIS-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of toxic chemicals from U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. There are currently 770 individually listed chemicals and 33 chemical categories covered by the TRI Program. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in amounts above established levels must submit annual reporting forms for each chemical. Note that the TRI chemical list does not include all toxic chemicals used in the U.S. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. This database includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022.

Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023

HAZ SANDIEGO

UST SANDIEGO

SAM SANDIEGO

PFAS GHG

OSC RESPONSE

FINDS/FRS
TRIS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1674
Item9.
179 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: rr-PFAS NPL-bb
This list of Superfund Sites with Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) detections is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data, previously the list was obtained by EPA FOIA requests. EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List (NPL) sites do not mean that people are at risk from PFAS, are exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS. The information in the Superfund NPL and Superfund Alternative Agreement (SAA) PFAS detection site list is years old and may not be accurate today. Site information such as site name, site ID, and location has been confirmed for accuracy; however, PFAS-related information such as media sampled, drinking water being above the health advisory, or mitigation efforts has not been verified. For Federal Facilities data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their data and provided them to EPA.

Government Publication Date: Dec 17, 2024
Federal Agency Locations with Known or Suspected PFAS Detections: rr-PFAS FED SITES-bb This list of federal agency locations with known or suspected detections of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) is made available by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools data. The EPA outlines that these data are gathered from several federal entities, such as the federal Superfund program, Department of Defense (DOD), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Transportation (DOT), and Department of Energy (DOE). The dates this data was extracted for the PFAS Analytic Tools range from 2022 to 2024. Sites on this list do not necessarily reflect the source/s of PFAS contamination and detections do not indicate level of risk or human exposure at the site.

Agricultural notifications in this data are limited to DOD sites only. At this time, the EPA is aware that this list is not comprehensive of all Federal agencies.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2024
SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites: rr-PFAS SSEHRI-bb
This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the PFAS Project Lab, part of the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents. Locations for the Known PFAS Contamination Sites are sourced from the PFAS Sites and Community Resources Map by the PFAS-REACH team, credited to PFAS Project Lab, Silent Spring Institute, and PFAS Exchange. Disclaimer: The source conveys the data undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Access the following source link for the most current information:
https://pfasproject.com/pfas-sites-and-community-resources/ Government Publication Date: Jun 27, 2024
National Response Center PFAS Spills: rr-PFAS ERNS-bb
This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Spills dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The National Response Center (NRC), operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, is the designated federal point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, and other discharges into the environment, for the United States and its territories. This dataset contains NRC spill information from 1990 to the present that is restricted to records associated with PFAS and PFAS-containing materials. Incidents are filtered to include only records with a "Material Involved" or "Incident Description" related to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). The keywords used to filter the data included "AFFF," "Fire Fighting Foam," "Aqueous Film Forming Foam," "Fire Suppressant Foam, "PFAS," "PERFL," "PFOA," "PFOS," and "Genx." Limitations: The data from the NRC website contains initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS spills/release incidents.

Government Publication Date: Dec 9, 2024
PFAS NPDES Discharge Monitoring: rr-PFAS NPDES-bb
This list of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities with required monitoring for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Substances is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s PFAS Analytic Tools. Any point-source wastewater discharger to waters of the United States must have a NPDES permit, which defines a set of parameters for pollutants and monitoring to ensure that the discharge does not degrade water quality or impair human health. This list includes NPDES permitted facilities associated with permits that monitor for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), limited to the years 2007 - present. EPA further advises the following regarding these data: currently, fewer than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees, and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. For states that may have required monitoring, some reporting and data transfer issues may exist on a state-by-state basis.

Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2024
Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Toxic Release Inventory: rr-PFAS TRI-bb

PFAS NPL

PFAS FED SITES

PFAS SSEHRI

PFAS ERNS

PFAS NPDES

PFAS TRI
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1675
Item9.
180 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a per- or polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substance included in the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Encompasses Toxics Release Inventory records included in the EPA PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA's TRI database currently tracks information on disposal or releases of 770 individually listed toxic chemicals and 33 chemical categories from thousands of U.S. facilities and details about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. This listing includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022.

Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023
PFAS Water Quality Portal Sampling Data: rr-PFAS WATER-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Environmental Media Sampling Data is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The Water Quality Portal (WQP), as a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey, the EPA, and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council, is part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental organizations, and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. Limitations: EPA did not carry out the sampling or testing of a majority of the data in the WQP PFAS dataset. EPA can only speak to the accuracy and completeness of the data from projects like the National Aquatic Resource Surveys for which EPA is the data owner/organization. Data may exist within the file on Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and the approving agency of the QAPP, if a QAPP is entered.

Government Publication Date: Jul 22, 2024
PFAS TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities: rr-PFAS TSCA-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. This list is specific only to TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities with reported per- and poly-fluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Data file is sourced from EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools TSCA dataset which includes CDR/Inventory Update Reporting data from 1998 up to 2020. Disclaimer: This data file includes production and importation data for chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox. Note that some regulations have specific chemical structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Reporting information on manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be compared between facilities, as some companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information.

Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023
PFAS Waste Transfers from RCRA e-Manifest : rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Waste Transfers dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. Every shipment of hazardous waste in the U.S. must be accompanied by a shipment manifest, which is a critical component of the cradle-to-grave tracking of wastes mandated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). According to the EPA, currently no Federal Waste Code exists for any PFAS compounds. To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords:  PFAS  PFOA  PFOS  PERFL  AFFF  GENX  GEN-X (plus the Vermont state-specific waste codes). Limitations: Amount or concentration of PFAS being transferred cannot be determined from the manifest information. Keyword searches may misidentify some manifest records that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS waste transfers.

Government Publication Date: Dec 15, 2024
PFAS Industry Sectors: rr-PFAS IND-bb
This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Industry Sectors dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA developed the dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS including: EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) records restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors; ECHO records for Fire Training Sites identified where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises; and 14 CFR Part 139 Airports compiled from historic and current records from the FAA Airport Data and Information Portal. Since July 2006, all certificated Part 139 Airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet certain military specifications, which to date have been fluorinated (Aqueous Film Forming Foam). Limitations: Inclusion in this dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufactured, processed, used, or released by the facility. Listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based on their industrial profile, but are unconfirmed by the EPA. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites may misidentify some facilities and should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of fire training facilities in the U.S.

Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2024
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: rr-HMIRS-bb The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) database contains unintentional hazardous materials release information reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

Government Publication Date: May 29, 2024
National Clandestine Drug Labs: rr-NCDL-bb

PFAS WATER

PFAS TSCA

PFAS E-MANIFEST

PFAS IND
HMIRS
NCDL
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1676
Item9.
181 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department"), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy.

Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2023
Toxic Substances Control Act: rr-TSCA-bb
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). EPA CDR collections occur approximately every four years and reporting requirements change per collection.

Government Publication Date: May 12, 2022
Hist TSCA: rr-HIST TSCA-bb
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006
FTTS Administrative Case Listing: rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb
An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
FTTS Inspection Case Listing: rr-FTTS INSP-bb
An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
Potentially Responsible Parties List: rr-PRP-bb
Early in the site cleanup process, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site.

This listing contains PRPs, Noticed Parties, at sites in the EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS).

Government Publication Date: Nov 20, 2024
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Since 2017, the SCRD no longer maintains this data, refer to applicable state source data where available.

Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database contains integrated enforcement and compliance information across most of U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) programs. The vision for ICIS is to replace EPA's independent databases that contain enforcement data with a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions and a subset of the Permit Compliance System (PCS), which supports the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This information is maintained by the EPA Headquarters and at the Regional offices. A future release of ICIS will completely replace PCS and will integrate that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also has the capability to track other activities that support compliance and enforcement programs, including incident tracking, compliance assistance, and compliance monitoring.

Government Publication Date: Apr 13, 2024
TSCA

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1677
Item9.
182 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Drycleaner Facilities: rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) data as made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sourced from the ECHO Exporter file. The EPA tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments.

Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024
Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb
List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment).

Government Publication Date: May 5, 2024
Formerly Used Defense Sites: rr-FUDS-bb
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. The FUDS Annual Report to Congress (ARC) is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial FUDS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) FUDS dataset which applies to the Fiscal Year 2021 FUDS Inventory.

Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023
FUDS Munitions Response Sites: rr-FUDS MRS-bb
Boundaries of Munitions Response Sites (MRS), published with the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Annual Report to Congress (ARC) by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). An MRS is a discrete location within a Munitions response area (MRA) that is known to require a munitions response. An MRA means any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or munitions constituents (MC). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial MRS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) MRS dataset.

Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023
Former Military Nike Missile Sites: rr-FORMER NIKE-bb
This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination.

Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984
PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb This list of flagged pipeline incidents is made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Accidents reported on hazardous liquid gravity lines (§195.13) and reporting-regulated-only hazardous liquid gathering lines (§195.15) and incidents reported on Type R gas gathering (§192.8(c)) are not included in the flagged incident file data.

Government Publication Date: May 6, 2024
Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): rr-MLTS-bb
A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016.

Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021
Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010
Mines Master Index File: rr-MINES-bb

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
FUDS

FUDS MRS

FORMER NIKE

PIPELINE INCIDENT
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1678
Item9.
183 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 The Master Index File (MIF) is provided by the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This file, which was originally created in the 1970's, contained many Mine-IDs that were invalid. MSHA removes invalid IDs from the MIF upon discovery. MSHA applicable data includes the following: all Coal and Metal/Non-Metal mines under MSHA's jurisdiction since 1/1/1970; mine addresses for all mines in the database except for Abandoned mines prior to 1998 from MSHA's legacy system (addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself); violations that have been assessed penalties as a result of MSHA inspections beginning on 1/1/2000; and violations issued as a result of MSHA inspections conducted beginning on 1/1/2000.

Government Publication Date: Feb 5, 2024
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: rr-SMCRA-bb This inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily legacy coal mining operations) is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), as it provides information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This inventory contains information on the type and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Problems, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The data is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Disclaimer: Per the OSMRE, States and tribes who enter their data into e-AMLIS (AML Inventory System) may truncate their latitude and longitude so the precise location of usually dangerous AMLs is not revealed in an effort to protect the public from searching for these AMLs, most of which are on private property. If more precise location information is needed, please contact the applicable state/tribe of interest.

Government Publication Date: May 20, 2024
Mineral Resource Data System: rr-MRDS-bb
The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world.

Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps.

Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2016
DOE Legacy Management Sites: rr-LM SITES-bb
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) currently manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The LM manages sites with diverse regulatory drivers (statutes or programs that direct cleanup and management requirements at DOE sites) or as part of internal DOE or congressionally-recognized programs, such as but not limited to: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA Title I, Tile II), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D), Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). This site listing includes data exported from the DOE Office of LM' s Geospatial Environmental Mapping System (GEMS). GEMS Data disclaimer: The DOE Office of LM makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the use, accuracy, availability, or completeness of the data presented herein.

Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2023
Alternative Fueling Stations: rr-ALT FUELS-bb
This list of alternative fueling stations is sourced from the Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy launched the AFDC in 1991 as a repository for alternative fuel vehicle performance data, which provides a wealth of information and data on alternative and renewable fuels, advanced vehicles, fuel-saving strategies, and emerging transportation technologies. The data includes Biodiesel (B20 and above), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Electric, Ethanol (E85), Hydrogen, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Renewable Diesel (R20 and above) fuel type locations.

Government Publication Date: Aug 29, 2024
Superfunds Consent Decrees: rr-CONSENT DECREES-bb
This list of Superfund consent decrees is provided by the Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division (ENRD) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applicable file. This listing includes Cases filed since 2010 limited to the following: Consent Decrees for CERCLA or Superfund Sites filed and/or as proposed within the ENRD's Case Management System (CMS); and applicable ENRD's Environmental Defense Section (EDS) CERCLA Cases with "Consent" in History Note. CMS may not reflect the latest developments in a case, nor can the agency guarantee the accuracy of the data. ENRD Disclaimer: Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA; response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA; however, this should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist.

Government Publication Date: Jun 26, 2024
Air Facility System: rr-AFS-bb
SMCRA
MRDS

LM SITES

ALT FUELS

CONSENT DECREES
AFS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1679
Item9.
184 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 This EPA retired Air Facility System (AFS) dataset contains emissions, compliance, and enforcement data on stationary sources of air pollution.

Regulated sources cover a wide spectrum; from large industrial facilities to relatively small operations such as dry cleaners. AFS does not contain data on facilities that are solely asbestos demolition and/or renovation contractors, or landfills. ECHO Clean Air Act data from AFS are frozen and reflect data as of October 17, 2014; the EPA retired this system for Clean Air Act stationary sources and transitioned to ICIS-Air.

Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2014
Registered Pesticide Establishments: rr-SSTS-bb
This national list of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide and/or device-producing establishments is based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that each producing establishment must place its EPA establishment number on the label or immediate container of each pesticide, active ingredient or device produced. An EPA establishment number on a pesticide product label identifies the EPA registered location where the product was produced. The list of establishments is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Transformers: rr-PCBT-bb Locations of Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. PCB transformer owners must register their transformer(s) with EPA. Although not required, PCB transformer owners who have removed and properly disposed of a registered PCB transformer may notify EPA to have their PCB transformer de-registered. Data made available by EPA.

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2019
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: rr-PCB-bb
Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number.

Government Publication Date: May 23, 2024
Power Plants: rr-POWER PLANTS-bb
This list of power plants is provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). The listing includes operable electric generating plants in the United States by energy source, originating from the EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report; EIA-860M, Monthly Update to the Annual Electric Generator Report; and EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report. It includes all operable plants by energy source with a combined nameplate capacity of 1 megawatt or more that are operating, are on standby, or out of service for short- or long-term.

Government Publication Date: Apr 15, 2024
State
PFAS Sampling Locations: rr-PFAS SAMPLING-bb
This data is sourced from the State Water Board's GeoTracker Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Map tool which contains individual sampling points (i.e., soil boring, groundwater monitoring well, drinking water well for municipal drinking water systems, etc.) or a site location with PFAS analytical data. Includes analytical results that are finalized and submitted electronically by the Responsible Parties via GeoTracker's Electronic Submittal of Information Portal, and after it's accepted by a Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2024
Dry Cleaning Facilities: rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Dec 20, 2021
Delisted Drycleaners: rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-bb
Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2022
Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program: rr-DRYC GRANT-bb A list of grant recipients of the Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program made available by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The program provides grants to eligible dry cleaning businesses to assist them in transitioning away from PERC machines to alternative non-toxic and non-smog forming technologies.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2022
SSTS
PCBT
PCB

POWER PLANTS

PFAS SAMPLING

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYCLEANERS

DRYC GRANT
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1680
Item9.
185 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 PFAS GeoTracker Cleanup Sites: rr-PFAS GT CLEANUPS-bb
A list of applicable cleanup sites from the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) GeoTracker data management system where one or more of the potential contaminants of concern are identified in the PFAS Structure List and/or PFAS Chemicals Without Explicit Structure List made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 15, 2025
PFOA/PFOS Groundwater: rr-PFAS GW-bb
A list of water wells from the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program (GAMA) Groundwater Information System with the groundwater chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (NL = 0.014 UG/L) or perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS) (NL = 0.013 UG/L). The GAMA Groundwater Information System search is made available by California Water Boards.

Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2024
PFAS Investigations: rr-PFAS INVEST-bb
This list of potential Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) sites is compiled from the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) PFAS Investigations Map tool. The SWRCB issued investigative orders, per California Water Code (CWC) Section 13267 and/or 13383, to these sites.

Orders were also issued to the public water systems to sample wells in the vicinity of these locations. Military facilities have been identified by the Department of Defense (DOD) as part of their efforts to investigate PFAS per the Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The data includes locations for Airports, Chrome Plating Facilities, Landfills, Publicly Owned Treatment Works, Refineries and Bulk Terminals, DOD Facilities, and Monitored Drinking Water Wells being investigated for potential PFAS.

Government Publication Date: Jan 23, 2024
Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup: rr-HWSS CLEANUP-bb The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2023
Toxic Pit Cleanup Act Sites: rr-TOXIC PITS-bb
The Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA) list identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. This list was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), is not longer maintained, and updates are not planned.

Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1995
List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action: rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment.

Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016
EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement: rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control's (DTSC) EnviroStor data management system.

Government Publication Date: Nov 23, 2023
School Property Evaluation Program Sites: rr-SCH-bb
A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school.

Government Publication Date: Dec 10, 2025
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This listing has been made available by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES).

Government Publication Date: Oct 21, 2024

PFAS GT CLEANUPS

PFAS GW

PFAS INVEST

HWSS CLEANUP

TOXIC PITS

DTSC HWF

INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1681
Item9.
186 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).

Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993
Handlers from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZNET-bb A list of handlers not otherwise classified as Treatment, Storage, Disposal facilities (TSDF) or generators from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016
Generators from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZ GEN-bb List of handlers listed as having generated waste from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
TSDF from Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZ TSD-bb
List of Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) from the facilities and manifests data made available by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in their Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS).

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992
DTSC Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters: rr-HW TRANSPORT-bb The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains this list of Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters.

Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 2025
Registered Waste Tire Haulers: rr-WASTE TIRE-bb
This list of registered waste tire haulers is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Feb 13, 2025
California Medical Waste Management Program Facility List: rr-MEDICAL WASTE-bb This list of Medical Waste Management Program Facilities is maintained by the California Department of Public Health. The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of medical waste by providing oversight for the implementation of the Medical Waste Management Act (MWMA). The MWMP permits and inspects all medical waste off-site treatment facilities, medical waste transporters, and medical waste transfer stations. This list contains transporters, treatment, and transfer facilities.

Government Publication Date: Sep 5, 2024
Historical Cortese List: rr-HIST CORTESE-bb
List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites.

Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008
Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders.

Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2021
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-CERS HAZ-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs:

Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET

HAZ GEN

HAZ TSD

HIST MANIFEST

HW TRANSPORT

WASTE TIRE

MEDICAL WASTE

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

CERS HAZ
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1682
Item9.
187 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 Government Publication Date: Oct 28, 2024
Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator.

Government Publication Date: Nov 29, 2018
Sites in GeoTracker: rr-GEOTRACKER-bb
GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. This is a list of sites in GeoTracker that aren't otherwise categorized as LUST, Land Disposal Sites (LDS), Cleanup Sites, or sites having Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). This listing includes program types such as Underground Injection Control (UIC), Confined Animal Facilities (CAF), Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, plans, and non-case information.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Mines Listing: rr-MINE-bb
This list includes mine site locations extracted from the Mines Online database, maintained by the California Department of Conservation. Mines Online (MOL) is an interactive web map designed with GIS features that provide information such as the mine name, mine status, commodity sold, location, and other mine specific data. Please note: Mine location information is provided to assist experts in determining the location of mine operators in accordance with California Civil Code section 1103.4 and reflects information reported by mine operators in annual reports provided under Public Resources Code section 2207. While the Division of Mine Reclamation (DMR) attempts to populate MOL with accurate location information, the DMR cannot guarantee the accuracy of operator reported location information.

Government Publication Date: Oct 3, 2024
Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens: rr-LIEN-bb
The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) maintains this list of liens placed upon real properties. A lien is utilized by the DTSC to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties for costs associated with the remediation of contaminated properties.

Government Publication Date: Dec 18, 2023
Waste Discharge Requirements: rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb
List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

Government Publication Date: Sep 25, 2024
Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities: rr-EMISSIONS-bb
A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2021
Clandestine Drug Lab Sites: rr-CDL-bb
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2021
Tribal
No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County

DELISTED HAZ

GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS
CDL
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1683
Item9.
188 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 25030401545 h-Definitions
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.

Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.

Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation.

Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report.

Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation.

Source: Google Elevation API.

Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections:
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.

Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property.

The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.

Definitions
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1684
Item9.

APPENDIX C

REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1685
Item9.

Request
Hello. We are seeking hazardous waste, hazardous materials, underground storage tank records and site assessment/mitigation files pertaining to the properties located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California.

Thanks.

Dan
TimelineDocuments
Anyone with access to this request
Request published
March 16, 2025, 9:35pm
Anyone with access to this request
Request closed
Hello,
This is in response to your California Public Records Act request, which the County of San Diego received on 03/11/2025 and which states:

We are seeking hazardous waste, hazardous materials, underground storage tank records and site assessment/mitigation files pertaining to the properties located at 1100 Hamilton Lane in Escondido, California.

The County does not have any records responsive to your request. Please note that 72 hours after you receive this message your request will become publicly available.

Thank you,
DEHQ- Hazardous Materials Division
County of San Diego
March 13, 2025, 12:02pm by StaƯ
Anyone with access to this request
Department assignment
Environmental Health and Quality - Hazardous Material Division (HMD) March 11, 2025, 2:31pm by the requester
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1686
Item9.

Anyone with access to this request
Request opened
Request received via web
March 11, 2025, 2:31pm by the requester
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1687
Item9.

APPENDIX D

HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1688
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1689
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1690
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1691
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1692
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1693
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1694
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1695
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1696
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1697
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1698
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1699
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1700
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1701
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1702
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1703
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1704
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1705
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1706
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1707
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1708
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1709
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1710
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1711
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1712
Item9.

Project Property:

Project No:

Requested By:

Order No:

Date Completed:
1100 Hamilton Lane
1100 Hamilton Lane
Escondido CA 92029
None
Weis Environmental, LLC
25030401545
March 05, 2025
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1713
Item9.

Topographic Map Symbology for the maps may be available in the following documents:

Pre-1947
1947-2009
2009-present
Topographic Maps included in this report are produced by the USGS and are to be used for research purposes including a phase I report.

Maps are not to be resold as commercial property.

No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.(in the US) and ERIS Information Limited Partnership (in Canada), both doing business as 'ERIS', using Topographic Maps produced by the USGS.

This maps contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein.

Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.

Topographic Map Symbols
US Topo Map Symbols
We have searched USGS collections of current topographic maps and historical topographic maps for the project property. Below is a list of maps found for the project property and adjacent area. Maps are from 7.5 and 15 minute topographic map series, if available.

Year Map Series
2022 7.5
2018 7.5
2015 7.5
1996 7.5
1975 7.5
1968 7.5
1949 7.5
1948 7.5
1942 15
1901 15
1893 15
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1714
Item9.
2022
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1715
Item9.
2018
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1716
Item9.
2015
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1717
Item9.
(1-1996) 1996 Aerial Photo Year: 1996
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1996)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1718
Item9.
(1-1975)
Aerial Photo Year: 1967
Photo Revision Year: 1975 1975
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1975)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1719
Item9.
(1-1968) 1968 Aerial Photo Year: 1967
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1968)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1720
Item9.
(1-1949) 1949 Aerial Photo Year: 1947
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1949)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1721
Item9.
(1-1948) 1948 Aerial Photo Year: 1947
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1948)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1722
Item9.
(1-1942) 1942 Aerial Photo Year: 1939
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA(1-1942)
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1723
Item9.
1901
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1724
Item9.
1893
Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map
Order No. 25030401545
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
Miles
Escondido, CA
¯
Available Quadrangle(s):

Escondido
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1725
Item9.

APPENDIX E

PHOTOGRAPHS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1726
Item9.

Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California

1. View from the northwest corner of the Site
facing south.

2. View from the northwest corner of the Site
facing east.

3. View from the southwest corner of the Site
facing northeast.

4. View from the southeast corner of the Site
facing northwest.

5. View from the southwest corner of the Site
facing north.

6. View from the northeast corner of the Site
facing southwest.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1727
Item9.

Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California

7. View from the center of the Site facing north. 8. View from the center of the Site facing east. 9. View from the center of the Site facing south.

10. View from the center of the Site facing west. 11. View of rock outcrops and vegetation piles in the center of the Site.

12. View of scrap metal debris in the center of the
Site.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1728
Item9.

Photograph Log 1100 Hamilton Lane Escondido, California

13. View of pole-mounted transformer along the
east side of the Site.

14. View of the east adjoining residential
property.

15. View of the south adjoining residential
property.

16. View of Bernardo Avenue, then the west
adjoining residential property.

17. View of Hamilton Lane, then the north
adjoining residential property.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1729
Item9.

APPENDIX F

INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1730
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1731
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1732
Item9.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1733
Item9.

APPENDIX G

QUALIFICATIONS
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1734
Item9.

Resume of Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.

Professional Summary
Environmental Manager and California Registered Environmental Health Specialist with extensive expertise in environmental science and assessment, environmental and public health, risk assessment, health and safety, remedial design and implementation, strategic planning and project/program design and implementation. Over 20 years of professional experience and achievement.

Successful completion of projects for a wide range of clientele including, but not limited to, local government entities, developers (affordable housing and market rate), educational institutions, Federal government entities, law firms, architectural and engineering firms, lending institutions, life insurance companies, conservancies, commercial/industrial real estate owners/managers, insurance companies, wireless telecommunication carriers and real estate developers. Extensive experienced in the completion of assessment, construction and remediation quality assurance during the completion of urban redevelopment/brownfields projects and public works projects, many of which have been located in downtown areas of San Diego, Los Angeles, Oakland, San Francisco, and other urban communities throughout the State of California. Proven ability to train and mentor professional, technical and support staff. Manages a comprehensive health and safety program. Holds a Master of Science in Public Health with an emphasis in environmental health science, risk assessment, health and safety, toxicology and environmental policy. Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 in the State of California.

Education and Professional Certification
භ University of Delaware, Bachelor of Arts, 1995
භ San Diego State University, Master of Science, Public/Environmental Health, 2001 භ State of California Registered Environmental Health Specialist #8172 භ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health Division of Emergency and Environmental Health Services - Environmental Health Training in Emergency Response භ Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard (HAZWOPER) Training and Annual 8 Hour HAZWOPER Refresher Training භ OSHA 8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training
Relevant Skills and Qualifications
භ Proven ability to manage staff and programs/projects in challenging and diverse environments and regulatory settings.

Consistently meets project schedules, goals, deadlines and budgetary restrictions. භ Completed or managed over 3,000 due diligence related environmental assessments and completed or managed over 500 subsurface environmental investigations of soil gas, soil, groundwater and other media. Investigations have included human health and ecological risk assessments, evaluations of indoor air conditions based on interpretations of subsurface conditions, underground storage tank (UST) evaluation/closure and hazardous waste characterization/management.

Subsurface activities performed include the completion of soil borings using various drilling technologies, soil and groundwater sampling, installation and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, free product evaluations, exploratory trenching and real-time delineation using mobile analytical laboratories and other soil screening technology. භ Managed over 100 remediation or construction management related projects primarily related to source removal of subsurface contaminants, including but not limited to, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, organochlorine pesticides and other agricultural related chemicals, dioxins and furans and polychlorinated biphenyls. Has also assisted in cost recovery efforts from private parties and State/Federal funding programs for environmental assessment and remediation work and has served as an expert witness during legal proceedings pertaining to environmental related claims.
භ Strong collaboration and negotiation skills with environmental regulatory agencies regarding project planning, initiation, status, approvals and implementation. Direct experience in interfacing with members of regulatory agencies including but not limited to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1938 Kellogg Avenue, Suite 116, Carlsbad, CA 92008

(760) 585-7070 // (760) 672-6338 //
[email protected] // à www.weisenviro.com
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1735
Item9.

Resume of Dan Weis, R.E.H.S.

Control and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, County of San Diego Departments of Environmental Health (DEH), Public Works and Planning and Land Use, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Riverside County DEH, San Francisco City and County Department of Public Health (DPH), Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, County of Los Angeles County DPH and other local Certified Unified Program Agencies. Develop, manage and implement compliance and best practices efforts with Federal and State laws and regulations.
භ Conducted and/or managed hundreds of public/environmental health related assessments including electromagnetic field surveys, radionuclide surveys, indoor air quality investigations, radon surveys, drinking water assessments, asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint surveys and mold/microbial evaluations. භ Recovered over $10,000,000 of assessment and cleanup costs for clientele from various sources including State of California Cleanup Funds, United States Environmental Protection Agency Brownfield grants and private parties including major oil companies.
භ Responsible for facilitating a safe and healthy work environment in concert with the mission of the company while ensuring compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local regulations. භ Published technical papers pertaining to geogenic concentrations of metals in San Diego County, radioactive dating and pollutant chronologies in estuarine sediments and various urban runoff related implications. භ Delivered presentations pertaining to various environmental topics including human health risk assessment to membership at local and national trade conferences
Project Experience
භ 14th and Island, San Diego, California – Development of Site Mitigation Plan, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities at the superblock construction site in downtown San Diego and achievement of regulatory closure with the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health. භ 2198 Market Street, San Francisco, California – Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, supplemental subsurface investigation, Site Mitigation Plan development, contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure with the City of San Francisco Department of Public Health.
භ Former EZ Serve, 9305 Mission Gorge Road, Santee, California – Closure report preparation and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board interface and negotiation/achievement of regulatory closure under State of California lowthreat policy. භ French Field – Former Vista Burn Dump, Oceanside, California – Oversight of the capping of a former burn dump/landfill facility and restoration for public use as a sports facility. Negotiation and achievement of regulatory closure with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control with concurrence from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and the County of San Diego Local Enforcement Agency. භ Indoor Skydiving Facility, 1401 Imperial Avenue, San Diego, California – Development of Soil Management Plan and contaminated soil management and disposal concurrent with site construction activities in downtown San Diego. භ Lemon Grove Avenue Realignment Project, Lemon Grove, California – Development of Impacted Soil Management Plan, Community Health and Safety Plan and Worker Health and Safety Plan and oversight of the implementation of such plans during construction activities.
භ North Side Interior Road and Utilities Project at San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California - Subsurface assessment, development of Soil Management Plan and Work Health and Safety Plan and implementation and monitoring of soil management strategies.
භ Olympic and Hill, Los Angeles, California – Removal of multiple underground storage tanks and underlying contaminated soil and achievement of regulatory closure with the City of Los Angeles Fire Department. භ San Ysidro - U.S. Land Port of Entry, San Diego, California – Subsurface assessment and development and implementation of soil management strategies.
භ VA Medical Center Long Beach, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, California - VA Long Beach: Seismic Corrections – Mental Health, Community Living Center and Chiller Replacements Project – Asbestos containing materials and leadbased paint surveys and preparation of abatement contractor bid specifications.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1736
Item9.

Appendix G – Scoping Agreement for
Transportation Studies
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1737
Item9.

APPENDIX A A
Scoping Agreement for Transportation Studies
PART 1
General Project Information and Description
Project Information
Project Name: Hamilton Ln 5-Lot TSM
Project Location: SE Corner of Bernardo Ave & Hamilton Ln Project Description
Land Uses and Intensities: 5 SFR with 5 ADU on 5-lots
Gross and Developable Acreage: 6.2 ac / 5 ac
Building Square Footage or Number of Dwelling Units:

Vehicle Parking Spaces: 15
Bicycle Parking Spaces: 0
Motorcycle Spaces: 0
Electric Vehicle Spaces:0
Project Applicant:

Name: Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Address: PO Box 1795, La Jolla, CA 92038
Telephone and Email: 858-699-9311 / [email protected] Consultant
Firm: Mizuta Traffic Consulting
Project Manager: Marc Mizuta, PE, TE, PTOE
Address: 5694 Mission Center Rd #602-121, San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone and Email: 858-752-8212 / [email protected] Project Trip Generation
Source: SANDAG Pass-by Trips: n/a
Total Daily Trips*: 80 Diverted Trips: n/a
Internal Capture Rate: 0 Trip Credit: 0
Alternative Modes: n/a Net New Daily Trips: 80
*If truck traffic accounts for 25% or more of project trips, then a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factor of 2.5 should be applied to all truck trips.

General Plan Consistency
Is this project consistent with the General Plan? 5Yes 侊 No Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1738
Item9.

Site Plan
Attach 11x17 copies of the project location/vicinity map and site plan containing the following:
x Driveway locations and access type
x Pedestrian access, bicycle access, and on-site pedestrian circulation x Location and distance to nearest existing transit stop (measure as walking distance to project entrance or middle of parcel)
x Location of planned or proposed pedestrian or bicycle improvements within ¼ mile of the project identified in the General Plan Mobility and Infrastructure Element or the Bicycle Master Plan CEQA Transportation Analysis Screening
Project Type Screening Criteria for CEQA Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Analysis 1) Select the Land Uses that apply to your project
2) Answer the questions for each Land Use that applies to yourproject (if “Yes” in any land use category below then that land use (or a portion of the land use) is screened from CEQA VMT Analysis; If a project is screened out, a technical memorandum is still required to document the screening process) Screened
Out
Not
Screened
Out
Yes No
5 1. Small Residential and Employment Projects:
a. Does the project result in 200 daily trips or less? 5 ܆ ܆ 2. Project is Located in a Transit-Accessible Area:
a. Is the project located within a half-mile walking distance of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor? ܆ ܆
b. Additional project features:
i. Does the SURMHFWKDYHD)ORRU$UHD5DWLR• 0.75? ܆ ܆ ii. Does project include the least amount of parkingrequired for residents, customers, or employees (i.e. not more than required)? ܆ ܆
iii. Is the project consistent with SANDAG’s most recent Sustainable Communities Strategy or the City of Escondido GeneralPlan? ܆ ܆
iv. Does the project replace affordable residential units with a greater number of moderate- or high-income residentialunits?
܆ ܆
v. Does the project have basic walking and biking accessto transit (e.g., sidewalks connecting to transit stops)?
܆ ܆
܆ 3. Project is in a VMT-Efficient Area:
a. Is the project in a VMT/Capita or VMT/Employee Efficient Area per SANDAG screening maps?
܆܆
܆ 4. Locally-Serving Retail Project:
a. Is the project less than 50,000 square feet and expected to draw at least 75% of customers from the local area?
܆ ܆
܆ 5. Locally Serving Public Facility:
a. Is the project a locally serving public facility? ܆܆ ܆ 6. Redevelopment Project:
a. Does the project result in a net decrease in total Project VMT than the existing use? ܆ ܆
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1739
Item9.

Non-CEQA Local Mobility Analysis
Local Mobility Analysis (LMA) Requirement
1) Select the Street Classifications for each street in the studyarea 2) Answer the questions for each Street Classification that applies to your project Yes No ܆ 1. Prime Arterial:
a. Does the project add 900 ADT or more to any segment classified as 8-lane Prime Arterial?
܆܆
b. Does the project add 800 ADT or more to any segment classified as 6-lane Prime Arterial?
܆܆
܆ 2. Major Road:
a. Does the project add 700 ADT or more to any segment classified as 6-lane Major Road?
܆ ܆
b. Does the project add 500 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Major Road?
܆ ܆
܆ 3. Collector:
a. Does the project add 500 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Collector without parking?
܆܆
b. Does the project add 250 ADT or more to any segment classified as 4-lane Collector with parking?
܆܆
5 4. Local Collector and other:
a. Does the project add 200 ADT or more to any segment classified as 2-lane Local Collector or any other classifications?
5 ܆
Certain types of projects which generate less than 500 ADT may be considered by the City staff for an LMA waiver only where the affected segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better.

Please briefly explain why your project might be eligible for an LMA waiver.

PART 2 (n/a)
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment
ڧSelect Zone (Model Series ) Projects that generate greater than 2,400 daily trips ڧManual Estimation Projects that generate less than 2,400 daily trips Provide an exhibit detailing the project’s trip distribution and trip assignment.

Provide a table with the project’s daily trip assignment for each street segment in the study area.

Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1740
Item9.

Study Intersections and Roadway Segments (NOTE: Subject to change based of staff review)

1. 6.

2. 7.

3. 8.

4. 9.

5. 10.

Attach a separate page if the number of study locations exceeds 10.

Other Jurisdictions
Is this project located within one mile of another Local Jurisdiction? ܆ Yes 5No If yes, name of Jurisdiction:

Specific Issues to be addressed within the Study
(in addition to requirements described in the Guidelines – to be filled out by City Staff)

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. Recommended by:

Consultant’s Representative Date
Scoping Agreement Submitted on
Date
Scoping Agreement Re-submitted on
Date
Approved Scoping Agreement:

City of Escondido Date
Transportation Specialist

C lt t’
ecommended by:

R tt
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1741
Item9.

PREPARED BY:

M A S S O N
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:OWNER/APPLICANT:

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1742
Item9.
% ADT % ADT
Single Family Detached 10 trips / du 8% 0.30 : 0.70 10% 0.70 : 0.30 Apartment 6 trips / du 8% 0.20 : 0.80 9% 0.70 : 0.30
In Out In Out
Single Family Detached 5 50 2 2 4 1
ADU 5 30 1 2 3 0
80 3 4 7 1
Notes:

TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
Land Use Amount ADT

AM PEAK PM PEAK
Total Total
TRIP GENERATION RATES1
Land Use Weekday Daily

AM PEAK PM PEAK
In:Out Ratio In:Out Ratio

1. The trip rates are based on SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. du: dwelling unit
TOTAL 78
du 3 3
Proposed Use
du 4 5
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1743
Item9.

Bicycle Network
LEGEND
Project Site 0.25-mile radius
Source: City of Escondido Bicycle Master Plan, Figure ES 1 Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1744
Item9.

Circulation Element
LEGEND
Project Site
Exhibit C
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "C"

1745
Item9.
1 Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Project Impact 2007 Mitigation Measure Responsible
Department
Monitoring
Action
Implementation
Schedule
Verification of Completion
Check Box Date
Air Quality
The project will
potentially impact
air quality in the
area surrounding the
project during
construction.

Prior to construction and issuance of grading
and building permits, a site-specific analysis
and report shall be prepared by a qualified
professional to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works and Building
Official to determine equipment and
methods necessary to protect adjacent
properties from adverse air quality impacts
which may result from construction.

A project-specific air quality analysis was
prepared forthe project and provided as part
of the discussion in Section 14.3, Air Quality.

The proposed project would have no adverse
effect on air quality. This mitigation measure
has been satisfied.

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Biological Resources
No non-native
grassland or coastal
sage scrub
vegetation was
reported in the
Biological Resources
Memorandum
prepared by Tierra
Data, Inc., July 2024.

These habitat types
no longer occur on
the site. Mitigation
from the 2007 Initial
Study pertaining to
BIO-1 and BIO-2. To address direct impacts
to non-native grasslands and coastal sage
scrub, the proposed mitigation ratio is 0.25:1
for non-native grasslands and 1:1 for coastal
sage scrub. This would be documented by a
purchase of habitat credits from an approved
mitigation bank(s).

Mitigation measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 would
be enforced at the City’s discretion.

City of Escondido
Planning
Department
Verify a purchase
of mitigation
credits.

Prior to grading
permit

EXHIBIT D
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "D"

1746
Item9.

Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Project Impact 2007 Mitigation Measure Responsible
Department
Monitoring
Action
Implementation
Schedule
Verification of Completion
Check Box Date
non-native grassland
and coastal sage
scrub remains
applicable.

Multiple trees would
be removed;
however, the Project
would be in
compliance with
City’s Municipal
Code requirements
for trees. Regardless,
for each Live Oak tree
removed, the tree
would be replaced
on-site and one
additional tree would
be planted on-site as
so stated in the 2007
Initial Study.

BIO-3. Impacts to native Live Oaks trees will
be mitigated by relocating the four Live Oaks
on-site and planting four new Live Oak trees
on-site.

City of Escondido
Building
Department
Verify that
replacement oak
trees are shown
on the landscape
plan and confirm
prior to final
approval of
landscaping
installation.

Prior to final
approval of
landscape
installation.

Multiple trees would
be removed to
accommodate the
proposed project. A
preconstruction
nesting survey
would be required
consistent with the
2007 Initial Study.

BIO-4. A qualified biologist must inspect trees
for nests priorto any brushing, grading, tree
relocation or construction within close
proximity to, or within the existing Oaks
discussed in the Biological Report's
addendum of 2/14/07. If any active nests of
sensitive species are found, no impacts will be
allowed until all young have fledged.

City of Escondido
Building
Department
Verify receipt of
preconstruction
survey report.

Prior to final
approval of the
grading permit.

The proposed project
would replace Live
Oak trees removed
BIO-5. The applicant shall provide funding
to the satisfaction of the City for the five-year
monitoring of the oak trees with sufficient
City of Escondido
Planning
Department
Verify that funds
have been
provided to cover
Prior to final
approval of
landscape
City of Escondido
Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "D"

1747
Item9.

Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Project Impact 2007 Mitigation Measure Responsible
Department
Monitoring
Action
Implementation
Schedule
Verification of Completion
Check Box Date
during construction at a
1:1 ratio on-site and
plant one additional
Live Oak tree as
mitigation for impacts
to Live Oak tree
impacts.
reserve for the replacement of any
dead/dying stock.
5-year monitoring
of oak trees.
installation.

Hazards
Project is near the
Chatham Barrel
Yard (a Superfund
Cleanup Site). The
project site has one
County Monitoring
well to that is to
remain.

Monitoring well MW57 is to remain
onsite and be accessible to the Chatham
Brothers RP Group for monitoring
purposes until officially released. Upon
release, it is to be removed per Regional
Board and City of Escondido standards.

Alternately, if a new replacement well is
installed nearby and approved by the
Regional Board and Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), existing well
MW57 can also then be released and
removed per Regional Board and City of
Escondido standards.

MW 57 was decommissioned as
documented in a letter provided by
Chatham Site PRP Group dated May 21,
2009. This mitigation measure is not
applicable.

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hydrology/Water Quality
Potable water would
be provided by the
City of Escondido
Water Department.

HYD-1. No drinking water wells shall be
drilled on-site and no excavations shall be
allowed on-site without proper permits.

City of Escondido
Building
Department
Verify that no
excavations
occurred prior to
receipt of the
Prior to issuance
of the grading
permit.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "D"

1748
Item9.

Hamilton Bernardo, LLC
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Project Impact 2007 Mitigation Measure Responsible
Department
Monitoring
Action
Implementation
Schedule
Verification of Completion
Check Box Date
No wells would be
drilled on-site.
applicable.
grading permit.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit "D"

1749
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “E”

EXHIBIT “E”
PLANNING CASE NO PL24-0067

FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED / FINDINGS OF FACT
Environmental Determinations:

1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.) (“CEQA”), and its implementing regulations (14 C.C.R. § 15000 et seq.) (“CEQA Guidelines”), the City of Escondido (“City”) is the Lead Agency for the project (“Project”), as the public agency with the principal responsibility for approving the Project.

2. In order to evaluate the previous 5-Lot Tentative Subdivision Project proposed on the subject site, under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) (City Log No. ER2005-33) was adopted by the Escondido City Council.

3. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 allows for a lead agency to prepare an Addendum to a previously certified environmental document if some changes or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent environmental document are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the adopted IS/MND, and the attached Project Addendum (“First Addendum”), and finds that these documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all of the environmental impacts associated with the modified Project, described herein. The City Council further finds that the First Addendum and administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, and that the adopted IS/MND, and this Project Addendum, reflect the City’s independent judgement.

4. Based on substantial evidence set forth in the record, including, but not limited to the 2007 IS/MND and the attached First Addendum, the City Council finds that, based on the whole record before them, none of the conditions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162-15163, requiring subsequent environmental review, have occurred because the modified Project:
a. Will not result in substantial changes that would require major revisions of the 2007 IS/MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Will not result in substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is developed that would require major revisions of the 2007 IS/MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects; c. Does not present new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the 1750
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “E”

time the 2007 IS/MND was certified and was approved showing any of the following:
i. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous negative declaration;
ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous IS/MND;
iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous IS/MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

5. Further, based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the 2007 adopted IS/MND and the First Addendum prepared for the Project, the City Council finds that the applicable mitigation measures identified in the 2007 IS/MND would ensure that any potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. No new mitigation measures are required to mitigate environmental impacts associated with the modified Project. Therefore, the Addendum supports the City’s consideration of the Project, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164.

6. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (c), the Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review, but can be attached to the original 2007 IS/MND.

7. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), all documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings are located at the City of Escondido, City Hall. The City Clerk, whose office is located at 201 North Broadway, Escondido CA 92025, is hereby designated as the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision is based, which documents and materials shall be available for public inspection and copying in accordance with the provisions of the California Public Records Act.

TENTATIVE MAP DETERMINATIONS (PL24-0067)
(Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 32 of the Escondido Municipal Code) With respect to Planning Case No. PL24-0067, City Council makes the finding that none of the findings (a) through (g) below in Section 66474 of the California Government Code that require a City to deny approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map apply to this Project for the reasons stated as follows:

1. That the proposed map is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act.
1751
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “E”

As detailed in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 28, 2026, the Project site is located within the Estate I (E1) General Plan land use designation which permits density on a sliding scale depending on the existing slope categories of a site. Based on a review of the Project site’s slopes, the Project’s maximum density is six units; however, the addition of a private road and stormwater basin as required for stormwater reduces density yield to five (5) dwelling units (per Article 32).

The Project is not located within a specific plan as shown on the City’s 2012 General Plan Land Use Map. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans.

The Project consists of five (5) residential lots for future development with single-family residence, which single-family residential is permitted by the Escondido Zoning Code (EZC), and consistent with the General Plan Estate I land use designation. The subdivision for the residential lots consists of a private road and biofiltration basin to be maintained by the future Homeowner’s Association (HOA). The design of the private road as shown on the Tentative Map is designed to meet City engineering standards, and the standards for the Escondido Fire Department. The Project is conditioned to comply with City standards related to street design. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

3. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed type of Project.

The Project site is approximately 6.02 gross acres consisting of slope categories mainly within the 0-15% range. Four (4) of the five (5) lots would take access from the proposed private road easement, while the remaining lot would take access from Bernardo Avenue to the west. All lots meet the standards required for residential development, and no unusual circumstances exist that would prohibit or constrain residential development on site. Furthermore, the site is physically suitable in that the proposed lot designs comply with EZC requirements for the R-1 zone pertaining to required minimum lot size and width.

4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Project includes a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide one existing lot into five (5) lots, one which contains the biofiltration basin for private drainage. As detailed in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 28, 2026, the Project site is located within the E1 land use designation which permits density on a sliding scale based on the slope category of the site. The permitted density is 6 dwelling units; however, required improvements to the site reduce the feasible density to 5 units. The minimum lot size for the parcels is 40,000 square-feet, and the minimum average lot width is 150 feet, consistent with Residential Estate (RE-40) standards.

Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife, or their habitat.

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Addendum (“First Addendum”) was prepared to the 2007 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), which analyzed the minor change to the previously approved project, Tract 931 (2005-06-AN, 2005-46-PZ, ER2005-33). The minor change, the addition of a biofiltration basin for stormwater drainage, is 1752
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “E”

not anticipated to result in substantial environmental impacts to the site, in that it is a requirement of state law regulating water runoff and water quality—regulations that did not exist at the time of the original approval. All potential environmental impacts previously identified under the adopted IS/MND are required to be mitigated accordingly. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The Project as designed is not anticipated to cause any public health problems. Further, the Project has been conditioned to prohibit the drilling of drinking wells on site as well as excavations.

Therefore, the Project is consistent with this finding.

7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

There are several easements that run throughout the proposed subdivision and Project site; however, none have been acquired by the public at large, and are all intended for private use.

The design of the subdivision and improvements as proposed would not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

8. All permits and approvals applicable to the proposed Tentative Map pursuant to Chapter 33 of this code have been obtained.

The Project consists of a request for a Tentative Subdivision Map. Approval of the Project would result in all permits applicable to the proposed Tentative Map being obtained, or conditioned to be obtained administratively as permitted by the Escondido Zoning Code. The Escondido Zoning Code does not require subdivisions of land to include architectural plotting of future residential uses. Therefore, the Project is conditioned to comply with requirements of Article 64 (Design Review) where architectural plotting would be approved administratively subject to Zoning Code requirements. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

9. All applicable requirements of the Map Act and any ordinance of the City of Escondido regulating or otherwise relating to the conversion of existing buildings into condominiums or stock cooperatives have been satisfied.

The Project does not include the conversion of existing buildings into condominiums or stock cooperatives. This finding for approval of a Tentative Map is not applicable to the Project.

10. The proposed Tentative Map shall be in conformity with the zone in which it is located. To the extent that the property, which is subject of the proposed Tentative Map, is an existing legal nonconforming multi-family residential use, this requirement shall not apply, in accordance with Chapter 33 of this code.

As detailed in the Planning Commission staff report dated April 28, 2026, the Project complies with all requirements of the Residential Estate – 40,000 (RE-40) zone, including minimum lot size, lot width, and density. Further, the proposed Tentative Map is not an existing legal nonconforming multi-family residential use. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding. 1753
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “E”

11. All requirements of CEQA have been met.

An Addendum to the previously adopted IS/MND was prepared in conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, and none of the triggers listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring the preparation of further environmental document apply. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this Finding.

No Net Loss Finding
(Government Code section 65683)
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65863, the City Council finds the following:

The Project site (Assessor Parcel No. 238-360-68-00) is identified in the Housing Element to accommodate a portion of the regional housing need. The estimated capacity on the Project site is as follows:

Very-low Low Moderate Above Moderate
0 0 0 5
The Project does not reduce the density of the site below what is projected in the Housing Element; the Housing Element shows a site capacity of 5 above-moderate income units, which matches the proposed Project.

Very-low Low Moderate Above Moderate
Sites
Inventory
capacity for
Project site
0 0 0 5
Proposed
Units 0
0 0 5
Change in
units +/(-)
- - - 0
The proposed development's residential density is consistent with the Housing Element, and the remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the requirements of Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584.
1754
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

EXHIBIT “F”
PLANNING CASE NO. PL24-0067

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This Project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application received by the City of Escondido on March 12, 2024, and the Project drawings consisting of Civil Sheets/Grading, Stormwater, and Landscape Plans; all designated as approved on April 28, 2026, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Development Services Department.

For the purpose of these conditions, the term “Applicant” shall also include the Project proponent, owner, permittee, and the Applicant’s successors in interest, as may be applicable.

A. General:

1. Acceptance of Permit. If the Applicant fails to file a timely and valid appeal of this Permit within the applicable appeal period, such inaction by the Applicant shall be deemed to constitute all of the following on behalf of the Applicant:
a. Acceptance of the Permit by the Applicant; and
b. Agreement by the Applicant to be bound by, to comply with, and to do all things required of or by the Applicant pursuant to all of the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Project Permit or other approval and the provisions of the Escondido Municipal Code or Zoning Code applicable to such Permit.

2. Permit Expiration. If the Permit was filed as or concurrent with a Tentative Map or Planned Development application, the Permit shall expire 36 months from the effective date of approval, unless additional time is granted pursuant to the Map Act or to the Escondido Municipal Code.

If not filed as concurrent with a Tentative Map or Planned Development application, the Permit shall automatically expire after one year from the date of this approval, or the expiration date of any extension granted in accordance with the Escondido Municipal Code and Zoning Code.

The Permit shall be deemed expired if a building permit has not been obtained or work has been discontinued in the reliance of that building permit. If no building permits are required, the City may require a noticed hearing to be scheduled before the authorized agency to determine if there has been demonstrated a good faith intent to proceed, pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of this Permit.

3. Certification. The Director of Development Services, or his/her designee, is authorized and directed to make, or require the Applicant to make, all corrections and modifications to the Project drawings and any other relevant document comprising the Project in its entirety, as necessary to 1755
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the Project. This includes amending the Project drawings as necessary to incorporate revisions made by the decision-making body and/or reflecting any modifications identified in these conditions of approval. A final Approved Plan set, shall be submitted to Planning Services for certification electronically. Said plans must be certified by the Planning Division prior to submittal of any post-entitlement permit, including grading, public improvement, landscape, or building plans for the Project.

4. Conformance to Approved Plans.
a. The operation and use of the subject property shall be consistent with the Project Description and Details of Request, designated with the Approved Plan set. b. Nothing in this Permit shall authorize the Applicant to intensify the authorized activity beyond that which is specifically described in this Permit. c. Once a permit has been issued, the Applicant may request Permit modifications. “Minor" modifications may be granted if found by the Director of Development Services to be in substantial conformity with the Approved Plan set, including all exhibits and Permit conditions attached hereto. Such “minor” modifications shall be processed through a substantial conformance process identified by the Planning Division. Modifications beyond the scope described in the Approved Plan set may require submittal of an amendment to the Permit and approval by the authorized agency.

5. Limitations on Use. Prior to any use of the Project site pursuant to this Permit, all Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

6. Certificate of Occupancy.
a. No change in the character of occupancy or change to a different group of occupancies as described by the Building Code shall be made without first obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Official, as required, and any such change in occupancy must comply with all other applicable local and state laws. b. Prior to final occupancy, a Planning Final Inspection shall be completed to ensure that the property is in full compliance with the Permit terms and conditions. The findings of the inspection shall be documented on a form and content satisfactory to the Director of Development Services.

7. Availability of Permit Conditions.
1756
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

a. Prior to grading permit issuance, the Applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded that sets forth the terms and conditions of this Permit approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Director of Development Services. b. The Applicant shall make a copy of the terms conditions of this Permit readily available to any member of the public or City staff upon request. Said terms and conditions shall be printed on any construction plans that are submitted to the Building Division for plan check processing.

8. Right to Entry. The holder of this Permit shall make the premises available for inspection by City staff during construction or operating hours and allow the investigations of property necessary to ensure that minimum codes, regulations, local ordinances and safety requirements are properly followed. The Applicant shall provide such business records, licenses, and other materials necessary upon request to provide evidence of compliance with the conditions of approval, as well as federal, state, or laws.

9. Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Laws. Nothing in this Permit shall relieve the Applicant from complying with conditions, performance standards, and regulations generally imposed upon activities similar in nature to the activity authorized by this permit. (Permits from other agencies may be required as specified in the Permit’s Details of Request.) This Permit does not relieve the Applicant of the obligation to comply with all applicable statutes, regulations, and procedures in effect at the time that any engineering permits or building permits are issued unless specifically waived herein.

No part of this Permit’s approval shall be construed to permit a violation of any part of the Escondido Municipal or Zoning Code. During Project construction and after Project completion, the Applicant shall ensure the subject land use activities covered by this Permit is conducted in full compliance with all local and state laws.

10. Fees. The appropriate development fees and Citywide Facility fees shall be paid in accordance with the prevailing fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. Through plan check processing, the Applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to:

Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and other fees listed in the Fee Schedule, which may be amended. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

Approval of this development project is conditioned upon payment of all applicable development fees and connection fees in the manner provided in Chapter 6 of the Escondido Municipal Code. 1757
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

11. Public Art Partnership Program. All requirements of the Public Art Partnership Program, Ordinance No. 86-70 shall be satisfied prior to any building permit issuance. The ordinance requires that a public art fee be added at the time of the building permit issuance for the purpose of participating in the City Public Art Program.

12. Clerk Recording.
a. State Law (SB 1535), effective January 1, 2007, requires certain projects to pay fees for purposes of funding the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If the Project is found to have a significant impact to wildlife resources and/or sensitive habitat, in accordance with State law, or if the Project was analyzed through a negative declaration or environmental impact report, the Applicant shall remit to the City of Escondido Planning Services, within two working days of the effective date of the adoption of the environmental document, a check payable to the “San Diego County Clerk,” in the amount that is published by the County Clerk’s Office. Failure to remit the required fees in full within the specified time noted above will result in County notification to the State that a fee was required but not paid, and could result in State imposed penalties and recovery under the provisions of the Revenue and Taxation code. In addition, Section 21089(b) of the Public Resources Code, and Section 711.4(c) of the Fish and Game Code provide that no project shall be operative, vested, or final until all the required filing fees are paid. The County Clerk’s Office filing fees for other environmental review documents are adjusted annually by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If the fee increase after the date of this approval, the Applicant shall be responsible for the increase.
b. For more information on filing fees, please refer to the County Clerk’s Office and/or the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5.

13. Legal Description Adequacy. The legal description attached to the application has been provided by the Applicant and neither the City of Escondido nor any of its employees assume responsibility for the accuracy of said legal description.

14. Application Accuracy. The information contained in the application and all attached materials are assumed to be correct, true, and complete. The City of Escondido is relying on the accuracy of this information and Project-related representations in order to process this application. Any permits issued by the City may be rescinded if it is determined that the information and materials submitted are not true and correct. The Applicant may be liable for any costs associated with rescission of such permits.

15. Enforcement. If any of the terms, covenants, or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, the City of Escondido shall have the right to deny or withhold subsequent permit approvals or permit inspections that are derived from the application entitlements herein granted; issue stop work orders; pursue 1758
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

abatement orders, penalties, or other administrative remedies as set forth in state and local laws; or institute and prosecute litigation to compel compliance with such terms, covenants, or conditions or seek damages for their violation. The Applicant shall be notified in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City.

16. Indemnification, Hold Harmless, Duty to Defend.
a. The Applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) the City, its Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, boards, commissions, departments, officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers (collectively, “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, proceedings (including but not limited to legal and administrative proceedings of any kind), suits, fines, penalties, judgments, orders, levies, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, or injuries, at law or in equity, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorney’s fees and other related litigation costs and expenses (collectively, “Claims”), of every nature caused by, arising out of, or in connection with (i) any business, work, conduct, act, omission, or negligence of the Applicant or the owner of the Property (including the Applicant’s or the owner of the Property’s contractors, subcontractors, licensees, sublessees, invitees, agents, consultants, employees, or volunteers), or such activity of any other person that is permitted by the Applicant or owner of the Property, occurring in, on, about, or adjacent to the Property; (ii) any use of the Property, or any accident, injury, death, or damage to any person or property occurring in, on, or about the Property; or (iii) any default in the performance of any obligation of the Applicant or the owner of the Property to be performed pursuant to any condition of approval for the Project or agreement related to the Project, or any such claim, action, or proceeding brought thereon. Provided, however, that the Applicant shall have no obligation to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend the City as to any Claims that arise from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. In the event any such Claims are brought against the City, the Applicant, upon receiving notice from the City, shall defend the same at its sole expense by counsel reasonably acceptable to the City and shall indemnify the City for any and all administrative and litigation costs incurred by the City itself, the costs for staff time expended, and reasonable attorney’s fees (including the full reimbursement of any such fees incurred by the City’s outside counsel, who may be selected by the City at its sole and absolute discretion and who may defend the City against any Claims in the manner the City deems to be in the best interests of the City).
b. The Applicant further and separately agrees to and shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City (including all Indemnified Parties) from and against any and all Claims brought by any third party to challenge the Project or its approval by the City, including but not limited to any Claims related to the Project’s environmental determinations or environmental review documents, or any other action taken by the City regarding 1759
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

environmental clearance for the Project or any of the Project approvals. Such indemnification shall include the Applicant’s payment for any and all administrative and litigation costs and expenses incurred by the City in defending against any such Claims, including payment for all administrative and litigation costs incurred by the City itself, the costs for staff time expended, and reasonable attorney's fees (including the full reimbursement of any such fees incurred by the City’s outside counsel, who may be selected by the City at its sole and absolute discretion and who may defend the City against any Claims in the manner the City deems to be in the best interests of the City and the Project).
c. The City, in its sole discretion and upon providing notice to the Applicant, may require the Applicant to deposit with the City an amount estimated to cover costs, expenses, and fees (including attorney’s fees) required to be paid by the Applicant in relation to any Claims referenced herein, which shall be placed into a deposit account from which the City may draw as such costs, expenses, and fees are incurred. Within 14 days after receiving written notice from the City, the Applicant shall replenish the deposit account in the amount the City determines is necessary in the context of the further defense of such Claims. To the extent such deposit is required by the City, the amount of such deposit and related terms and obligations shall be expressed in a written Deposit Account Agreement, subject to the City Attorney’s approval as to form. The City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, shall determine the amount of any initial deposits or subsequent deposits of funds, and the Applicant may provide documentation or information for the City to consider in making its determinations. Nothing within this subsection shall be construed as to relieve the Applicant’s obligations to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend the City as otherwise stated herein.

17. Phasing. A phasing plan shall be submitted for all projects which include more than one building.

The phasing plan shall identify the order in which all on- and off-site improvements will be installed, including triggers for improvements resulting from mitigation measures placed on the project through the environmental review process or required for General Plan conformance.

The plan shall also identify the order in which structures will be built and occupied, the location of construction fencing at each phase of construction, and any other means necessary to prevent conflicts between construction traffic and users of the occupied buildings. The phasing plan shall be approved by the City Planner, Building Official, City Engineer and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project. The phasing plan shall not be modified without written consent from the City of Escondido.

B. Construction, Maintenance, and Operation Obligations:

1. Code Requirements. All construction shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Escondido Municipal Code, Escondido Zoning Code, California Building Code; and the requirements of the Planning Division, Engineering Services Department, Director of Development Services, Building Official, City Engineer, and the Fire Chief in carrying out the 1760
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

administration of said codes. Approval of this Permit request shall not waive compliance with any City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein.

As a condition of receiving the land use approvals specified herein, Applicant shall maintain the property subject to the approvals in compliance with all applicable city codes governing the condition or appearance of property. In addition to compliance with such basic standards, the property subject to these approvals shall also be maintained free of trash, plant debris, weeds, and concrete (other than existing foundations and permanent structures). Any signs placed on the property advertising such property for sale or rent shall be in accordance with applicable laws, and be kept clean, in like-new condition, and free from fading and graffiti at all times. This condition shall be applicable from the date the land use is approved. The failure to comply with this condition shall subject the approvals specified herein to revocation for failure to comply.

2. Agency License and Permitting. In order to make certain on- or off-site improvements associated with the Approved Plan set, the Permit request may require review and clearance from other agencies. Nothing in these Conditions of Approval shall be construed as to waive compliance with other government agency regulations or to obtain permits from other agencies to make certain on- or off-site improvements prior to Final Map recordation, grading permit issuance, building permit issuance, or certificate of occupancy as required. This review may result in conditions determined by the reviewing agency.

At all times during the effective period of this Permit, the Applicant and any affiliated responsible party shall obtain and maintain in valid force and effect, each and every license and permit required by a governmental agency for the construction, maintenance, and operation of the authorized activity.

3. Utilities. All new utilities and utility runs shall be underground, or fee payment in-lieu subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

4. Signage. All proposed signage associated with the Project must comply with Article 66 (Sign Ordinance) of the Escondido Zoning Code. Separate sign permits will be required for Project signage. All non-conforming signs shall be removed. The Applicant shall submit with any sign permit graphic/list of all signs to be removed and retained, along with any new signage proposed.

5. Noise. All Project generated noise shall conform to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Ordinance 90- 08).

6. Lighting. All exterior lighting shall conform to the requirements of Article 35 (Outdoor Lighting Ordinance) of the Escondido Zoning Code.

7. General Property Maintenance. The property owner or management company shall maintain the property in good visual and functional condition. This shall include, but not be limited to, all 1761
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

exterior elements of the buildings such as paint, roof, paving, signs, lighting and landscaping.

The Applicant shall paint and re-paint all building exteriors, accessory equipment, and utility boxes servicing the Project, as necessary to maintain clean, safe, and efficient appearances.

8. Anti-Graffiti. The Applicant shall remove all graffiti from buildings and wall surfaces within 48 hours of defacement, including all areas of the job site for when the Project is under construction.

9. Anti-Litter. The site and surrounding area shall be maintained free of litter, refuse, and debris.

Cleaning shall include keeping all publicly used areas free of litter, trash, and garbage.

10. Roof, Wall, and Ground Level Equipment. All mechanical equipment shall be screened and concealed from view in accordance with Section 33-1085 of the Escondido Zoning Code.

11. Trash Enclosures. All appropriate trash enclosures or other approved trash systems shall be approved by Planning and Engineering Services. The property owner or management company shall be responsible for ensuring that enclosures are easily assessable for garbage and recyclables collection; and that the area is managed in a clean, safe, and efficient manner. Trash enclosure covers shall be closed when not in use. Trash enclosures shall be regularly emptied.

There shall be the prompt removal of visible signs of overflow of garbage, smells emanating from enclosure, graffiti, pests, and vermin.

12. Staging Construction Areas. All staging areas shall be conducted on the subject property, subject to approval of the Engineering Department. Off-site staging areas, if any, shall be approved through the issuance of an off-site staging area permit/agreement.

13. Disturbance Coordinator. The Applicant shall designate and provide a point-of-contact whose responsibilities shall include overseeing the implementation of Project, compliance with Permit terms and conditions, and responding to neighborhood concerns.

14. Construction Waste Reduction, Disposal, and Recycling. Applicant shall recycle or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of the non-hazardous construction and demolition waste for residential projects or portions thereof in accordance with either Section 4.408.2, 4.408.3, or

4.408.4 of the California Green Building Standards Code; and/or for non-residential projects or portions thereof in accordance with either Section 5.408.1.1, 5.408.1.2, or 5.408.1.3 of the California Green Building Standards Code. In order to ensure compliance with the waste diversion goals for all residential and non-residential construction projects, the Applicant must submit appropriate documentation as described in Section 4.408.5 of the California Green Building Standards Code for residential projects or portions thereof, or Section 5.408.1.4 for nonresidential projects or portions thereof, demonstrating compliance with the California Green Building Standards Code sections cited above.

15. Construction Equipment Emissions. Applicant shall incorporate measures that reduce construction and operational emissions. Prior to the City’s issuance of the demolition and 1762
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

grading permits for the Project, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Division that its construction contractor will use a construction fleet wherein all 50-horsepower or greater diesel-powered equipment is powered with California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) certified Tier 4 Interim engines or equipment outfitted with CARB-verified diesel particulate filters. An exemption from this requirement may be granted if (i) the Applicant provides documentation demonstrating that equipment with Tier 4 Interim engines are not reasonably available, and (ii) functionally equivalent diesel PM emission totals can be achieved for the Project from other combinations of construction equipment. Before an exemption may be granted, the Applicant’s construction contractor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services that (i) at least two construction fleet owners/operators in San Diego County were contacted and those owners/operators confirmed Tier 4 Interim equipment could not be located within San Diego County during the desired construction schedule, and (ii) the proposed replacement equipment has been evaluated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) or other industry standard emission estimation method, and documentation provided to Planning Services confirms that necessary project-generated functional equivalencies in the diesel PM emissions level are achieved.

C. Parking and Loading/Unloading.

1. Upon construction of the dwelling units, a minimum of two off-street covered parking spaces shall be provided for each parcel at all times. Said parking spaces provided by the Applicant, and any additional parking spaces provided above the required minimum amount, shall be dimensioned per City standards and be maintained in a clean, well-marked condition. The striping shall be drawn on the plans or a note shall be included indicating double-striping per City standards.

2. No contractor or employee may store, or permit to be stored, a commercial or construction vehicle/truck; or personal vehicle, truck, or other personal property on public-right-of-way or other public property without permission of the City Engineer.

D. Landscaping: The property owner or management company assumes all responsibility for maintaining all on-site landscaping; any landscaping in the public right-of-way adjacent to the property, including potted plants; and any retaining and freestanding walls in a manner that satisfies the conditions contained herein.

1. Landscaped areas shall be maintained in a flourishing manner. Appropriate irrigation shall be provided for all landscape areas and be maintained in a fully operational condition.

2. All existing planting and planter areas, including areas within the public right-of-way, shall be repaired and landscaping brought into compliance with current standards. All dead plant material shall be removed and replaced by the property owner or management company.

3. If at the time of planning final inspection that it is determined that sufficient screening is not provided, the Applicant shall be required to provide additional landscaping improvements to the satisfaction of the Planning Division.
1763
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

4. The landscaped areas shall be free of all foreign matter, weeds and plant material not approved as part of the landscape plan.

5. Failure to maintain landscaping and the site in general may result in the setting of a public hearing to revoke or modify the Permit approval.

6. Landscaping Plans. Applicant shall install all required improvements including screening walls, retaining walls, storm improvements, and landscaping in substantial conformance to the planting and irrigation schedule as shown on the final Approved Plan set. a. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval, if meeting any of the criteria listed under Section 33-1323 of the Zoning Code. Five copies of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department with the second submittal lf the grading plan. The initial submittal of the landscape plans shall include the required plan check fees, paid in accordance with the prevailing fee schedule in effect at the time of submittal. Details of Project fencing and walls, including materials and colors, shall be provided on the landscape plans. (Building permits may also be required.) The landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Services and Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of grading permits, and shall be equivalent or superior to the conceptual landscape plans included as part of the Approved Plan set, to the satisfaction of Planning Services. The required landscape and irrigation plans(s) shall comply with the provisions, requirements and standards outlined in Article 62 (Landscape Standards) of the Escondido Zoning Code, except where stricter requirements are imposed by the State of California.
b. Screening walls, retaining walls, storm improvements, and landscaping (i.e. planting and irrigation) is to be provided prior to final occupancy. c. The installation of the landscaping and irrigation shall be inspected by the Project landscape architect upon completion. He/she shall complete a Certificate of Landscape Compliance certifying that the installation is in substantial compliance with the approved landscape and irrigation plans and City standards. The Applicant shall submit the Certificate of Compliance to Planning Services and request a final inspection. d. Any new freestanding walls and/or retaining walls shall incorporate decorative materials or finishes, and shall be indicated on the landscaping plans. (Building permits may also be required.) All freestanding walls visible from points beyond the Project site shall be treated with a protective sealant coating to facilitate graffiti removal. The sealant shall be a type satisfactory to the Director of Development Services. e. New or retrofitted trash enclosures shall accommodate vertical climbing plants, vines with support trellis panels, clinging non-deciduous or fast growing shrubbery that will screen 1764
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

the enclosures wall surface. The Director of Development Services shall find that the proposed landscaping design, material, or method provides approximate equivalence to the specific requirements of this condition or is otherwise satisfactory and complies with the intent of these provisions.
f. All manufactured slopes, or slopes cleared of vegetation shall be landscaped within thirty (30) days of completion of rough grading. If, for whatever reason, it is not practical to install the permanent landscaping, then an interim landscaping solution may be acceptable. The type of plant material, irrigation, and the method of application shall be to the satisfaction of Planning Services and the City Engineer. g. All slopes shall be landscaped with suitable material to control erosion. All manufactured slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Fill slopes shall have a minimum of six (6) trees, fifteen (15) gallon in size and ten (10) shrubs, five (5) gallon size per 1,000 square feet of slope area plus ground cover. Groundcover shall provide one hundred percent coverage within one year of installation. Cut slopes shall have a minimum of six (6) trees, five (5) gallon in size and ten (10) shrubs, one (1) gallon size per 1,000 square feet of slope area plus ground cover. Groundcover shall provide one hundred percent coverage within one year of installation. The type of plant material shall be low maintenance, dought resistant, and fast growing, to the satisfaction of Planning Services. In particular, the ground cover shall be a fast-growing species which establishes quickly and is capable of choking out weeds.

All slopes over three vertical feet shall be irrigated with an individual lot irrigation system approved by Planning and Building Services.
h. One 15-gallon street tree per 30 feet of linear frontage shall be provided along every frontage in, or adjacent to this subdivision in conformance with the Escondido Landscape Ordinance (EZC Article 62), and approved Street Tree List. Specimen size trees (min. 24-inch box per nursery standards) along with shrubs and groundcover, shall be incorporated into the landscape design along the proposed private road, Bernardo Avenue, and Hamilton Lane. The type and location of trees shall be identified on the landscape plans.
i. Any common open space areas shall be maintained through a landscape maintenance district, Homeowner’s Association (HOA), or other means to the satisfaction of the City. j. Any fencing proposed on individual lots shall be generally located at the top of slopes to the satisfaction of Planning Services.

E. Specific Planning Services Conditions:
a. All future habitable buildings within the subdivision shall be noise-insulated to maintain interior noise levels not to exceed 45 dBA. A final interior noise assessment shall be submitted prior to building permit issuance, and with the building plans during the plan 1765
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

check process, demonstrating compliance with the interior noise requirements.

Recommendations of the study shall be included in the building construction plans. b. Prior to Final Map approval, a note shall be included on the Final Map, or other documents provided, stating that the grading shall be in conformance with the submitted conceptual design.
c. No street names are a part of this approval. The Applicant shall submit a separate request prior to Final Map recordation, through the Planning service area of Develoment Services.

Street names shall be approved prior to Final Map approval. d. Administrative Design Review shall be required prior to submittal of a grading permit. The Applicant shall submit a Design Review Permit pursuant to Article 64 (Design Review) of the Escondido Zoning Code prior to Grading Permit issuance for final plotting design. e. Based on the sensitivity of the project site and the presence of P-37-012525, archaeological and Native American monitoring shall be required and conducted during all project-related ground disturbance, including but not limited to, grading and excavation for and installation of foundations and utilities. The Applicant shall provide evidence of contract with a tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the Project site area to Planning Services staff prior to any ground disturbance.

Within 30 days of the conclusion of all monitoring activities, an archaeological monitoring report shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and submitted to the appropriate parties detailing the results of all monitoring activities and any cultural resources identified.

Any discoveries of cultural resources or human remains shall be addressed in accordance with the unanticipated discovery measures outlined below. f. Mitiation Measures
The Project shall comply with all the requirements of the final adopted revised Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit “D” to Resolution No. 2026-03 and as summarized below:

Biological Resources
BIO-1 and BIO-2: To address direct impacts to non-native grasslands and coastal sage scrub, the proposed mitigation ratio is 0.25:1 through the purchase of habitat credits from an approved mitigation bank for non-native grassland. For impacts to 0.02 acres of coastal sage scrub, U.S. Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Game approval would be required. Mitigation measures would be enforced at the City’s discretion.

BIO-3: Impacts to native Live Oaks trees will be mitigated by relocating the four Live Oaks on-site and planting four new Live Oak trees on-site.
1766
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

BIO-4: A qualified biologist must inspect trees for nests prior to any brushing, grading, tree relocation or construction within close proximity to, or within the existing Oaks discussed in the Biological Report's addendum of 2/14/07. If any active nests of sensitive species are found, no impacts will be allowed until all young have fledged.

BIO-5: The applicant shall provide funding to the satisfaction of the City for the five-year monitoring of the oak trees with sufficient reserve for the replacement of any dead/dying stock.

Hydrology/Water Quality
HYD-1: No drinking water wells are to be drilled on-site and no excavations shall be allowed on-site without proper permits.

F. Specific Fire Department Conditions:
a. Project is located in the Very High Fire severity zone and shall be constructed in compliance with the California Wildland Urban Interface Code (WUI). b. An approved paved access and adequate water supply shall be provided prior to the start of construction.
c. A minimum hydrant fire flow of 1500 GPM at 20 PSI shall be provided for this Project.

G. Specific Engineering Services Conditions:

1. The Developer shall provide the City Engineer with a Subdivision Guarantee and Preliminary Title Report covering subject property.

2. The location of all existing on-site and adjacent utilities and storm drain facilities shall be determined by the Developer’s engineer. If a conflict occurs with the proposed project or improvements, arrangements for relocation of the conflicting utilities/facilities shall be made with the owner of the utility/facility prior to approval of the Grading plans and Final Map. This utility/facility relocation work shall be completed prior to issuance of Building Permits.

3. Improvement plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, required for all public street, utility, and storm drain improvements, and Grading/Private Improvement plans prepared by Civil Engineer, required for all grading, drainage and private onsite improvement design, shall be submitted for review through the City’s virtual plan review portal and each shall contain all items on the Engineering Initial Submittal Checklists. Landscaping Plans shall be prepared by a Landscape Architect.

4. The Developer shall post securities in accordance with the City prepared Bond and Fee Letter based on a final Engineer’s Estimate of Grading and Improvements Cost prepared by the 1767
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

project engineer. The Developer is required to provide a Grading Surety Bond together with a Cash Clean-up Deposit for all grading, landscaping, private Improvements and onsite drainage improvements prior to approval of Grading Plans and issuance of Grading Permit. The Cash Clean Up Deposit amount shall be 10% of the total cost of the project grading, private improvements, drainage, and landscaping. The Developer is required to provide Performance (100% of total public improvement cost estimate), Labor and Material (50% of total public improvement cost estimate) and Guarantee and Warrantee (10 % of total public improvement cost estimate) bonds for all public improvements prior to approval of the Improvement Plans and issuance of Building Permits. All improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

5. As surety for the construction of required off-site and/or on-site improvements, bonds and agreements in a form acceptable to the City Attorney shall be posted by the Developer with the City of Escondido prior to the approval of any Grading Plan or Building permit.

6. No Building Permits shall be issued for any construction within this Subdivision until the Final Subdivision Map is recorded and either:
a) All conditions of the Tentative Subdivision Map have been fulfilled, or b) Those conditions unfulfilled at the time of an application for Building Permits shall be secured and agreements executed in a form and manner satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer.

7. If site conditions change adjacent to the proposed development prior to completion of the project, the Developer will be responsible to modify his/her improvements to accommodate these changes. The determination and extent of the modification shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

8. All public improvements shall be constructed in a manner that does not damage existing public improvements. Any damage shall be determined by and corrected by the Developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

9. The Tentative Map certified by the Planning Department that it is an accurate reproduction of the approved Tentative Map together with a copy of the final adopted Conditions of Approval must be included with the first Final Engineering submittal for plan check to the Engineering Department.

STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC

1. Public street and drainage improvements shall be constructed to City Standards in effect at the time of the Tentative Map approval and shall be submitted on public improvement plans prepared by a Civil Engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to first occupancy.

Specific details, including final concrete driveway apron design for the project entrances, concrete curb & gutter and sidewalk replacement, drainage, street lighting, etc. shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

2. All structural improvements and overlays to public and private roadways shall adhere to the most recent Caltrans Standard specifications for asphalt concrete (AC), hot mix asphalt (HMA), asphalt binders (AB), and Portland cement concrete (PCC). Materials shall be sourced from a 1768
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

Caltrans-approved facility or supplier(s) based off the respective materials being replaced or improved upon. For AC or HMA replacement, materials shall be sourced from suppliers listed on the Caltrans “Asphalt Supplier Certification Program”, or on the Caltrans “Job Mix Formula Prequalification Program”, respectively. For AB replacement, materials shall be Caltransapproved Class 2 Aggregate Base sourced from Caltrans-approved suppliers listed on the Caltrans “Aggregate Prequalification Program”. All PCC shall have undergone the Caltrans Material Plant Quality Program (MPQP) to obtain their respective Plant Certification, and shall be listed on the MPQP “List of Active Plants in the State”.

3. Prior to first occupancy the developer shall construct street improvements, including but not limited to, concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, paving and base on the following streets adjoining the project boundary:

STREET CLASSIFICATION
Bernardo Avenue Local Collector
Hamilton Lane Local Collector
Private Street Rural Residential (28’ curb to curb)
See appropriate typical sections in the current Escondido Design Standards for additional details.

4. The Developer shall widen Bernardo Avenue to Local Collector Standards along the project frontage with approximately 13 feet of new structural section and grind and overlay to 12’ feet west of centerline.

5. The Developer shall widen Hamilton Lane to Local Collector Standards along the project frontage with approximately 33 feet of new structural section and grind and overlay beyond that as needed for transitions.

6. The project entrances shall be designed as a street intersection with curb returns, cross gutters, spandrels, and pedestrian ramps.

7. The onsite private street shall be designed and constructed per the City’s Rural Residential Street Standard with a “hammerhead” emergency vehicle turn-around at its terminus to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. A 4.5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along the west side only. Parking will only be allowed on the west side and parking restriction signing and striping will be required along the east side and within the emergency vehicle turn-around area. Typical sections and design details shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The required CC&Rs shall include provisions for the Home Owner’s Association to maintain all aspects of this private street.

8. The developer shall be required to construct a LED street lights in accordance with Escondido Standard Drawing No. E-1-E on the project corner of the Bernardo Ave. and Hamilton Lane intersection and on Bernardo Lane at the project’s southerly boundary.

9. The private street shall be adequately illuminated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Marshal. This lighting shall be maintained by the Home Owner’s Association as detailed in the CC&Rs.
1769
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

10. The Developer shall construct a high visibility cross walk across the south leg of Bernardo Avenue at the Bernardo Avenue and Hamilton Lane intersection.

11. The Developer’s engineer shall prepare and submit for approval by the City Engineer a complete final Signing and Striping plan for all improved and modified roadways. The Developer will be responsible for removal of all existing and the construction of all new signing and striping in compliance with the current CA MUTCD standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

12. The Developer shall construct additional transitional paving within the existing rights-of-way as needed to accommodate any required lane striping alignment and/or transitions per the above required Signing and Striping plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

13. The Developer shall repaint all pavement striping and markings adjacent to the project that have been damaged and prematurely faded due to project construction traffic to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

14. Adequate horizontal sight distance shall be provided at the project entrance. Increased parkway widths, open space easements, and restrictions on landscaping may be required at the discretion of the City Engineer.

15. Pedestrian access routes meeting current ADA requirements shall be provided into the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Building Official.

16. Any proposed gated entrance shall be privately operated and maintained by the Home Owner’s Association and shall be approved by the City Engineer, Building Official, and the Fire Marshal.

17. The Developer will be required to provide a detailed detour and traffic control plan, for all construction and staging activities, and any requested materials placement within existing rights-of-way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This plan shall include any proposed sidewalk closures and provide for alternate pedestrian access around the project site. This plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit for construction or other project activities within the public right-of-way.

GRADING and SITE IMPROVEMENTS

1. A site grading and erosion control plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permits. The first submittal of the grading plan shall be accompanied by 3 copies of the preliminary soils and geotechnical report. The Soils Engineer will be required to indicate in the soils report that he/she has reviewed the grading design and found it to be in conformance with his/her recommendations.

2. All private driveways and parking areas shall be paved with a minimum of 3” AC over 6” of AB or 7” PCC over 6” AB. All paved areas exceeding 15% slope or less than 1.0% shall be paved with PCC.

3. Any proposed retaining walls not a part of the building foundations or stem walls shall be shown on and permitted as part of the site grading plan. Profiles and structural details shall be shown on the site grading plan and the Soils Engineer shall state on the plans that the proposed 1770
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

retaining wall design is in conformance with the recommendations and specifications as outlined in the Geotechnical report. Structural calculations shall be submitted for review by a Consulting Engineer for all walls not covered by Regional or City Standard Drawings. Stem walls, foundation structures, or deepened footings that are to be constructed as part of a building structure will be permitted as part of the Building Dept. plan review and permit process.

4. The Developer will be required to obtain permission from adjoining property owners for any offsite grading or work necessary to construct the project and/or the required improvements.

5. Erosion control, including riprap, interim slope planting, sandbags, or other erosion control measures shall be provided to control sediment and silt from the project. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all erosion control facilities throughout the project.

6. The Developer shall be responsible for the recycling of all excavated materials designated as Industrial Recyclables (soil, asphalt, sand, concrete, land clearing brush and rock) at a recycling center or other location(s) approved by the City Engineer.

7. A Construction General Permit is required from the State Water Resources Control Board for all storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in a land disturbance of one or more acres.

8. All blasting operations performed in connection with the improvement of the project shall conform to the City of Escondido Blasting Operations Ordinance.

9. All existing foundations, structures, trees not otherwise than those designated “to remain” on the Tentative Map, shall be removed or demolished from the site.

10. Unless specifically permitted to remain by the County Health Department, all existing wells within the project or affected by the off-site improvements shall be abandoned and capped, and all existing septic tanks within the project or affected by the off-site improvements shall be pumped and backfilled per County Health Department requirements.

11. All driveway grades shall conform to current Escondido Design Standards and Escondido Standard Drawings.

DRAINAGE

1. Final on-site and off-site storm drain improvements shall be determined to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall be based on a Drainage Study to be prepared by the Engineer of Work. The drainage study shall be in conformance with the City of Escondido Design Standards.

2. The outlet for the project’s large storm water basin shall connect to the existing 36-inch reinforced concrete storm drain system in Bernardo Ave. south of the project near Park Place.

Developer shall construct a public type “B” curb inlet and extend an 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe storm drain in Bernardo Ave. to make this connection. Work in the area of this storm drain connection at Park Place will likely require an Encroachment Permit from the County.

3. All on-site storm drains not in public easements are private. The responsibility for maintenance of these private storm drains, the storm water basin and treatment facilities shall be that of the 1771
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

Home Owners Association and clear provisions for this maintenance shall be included in the CC&Rs.

4. The project shall limit drainage flows to their pre-construction rates. Details and calculations for the detention basins shall be submitted and approved as part of the grading plan check.

5. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) in compliance with the City’s latest adopted Storm Water Design Manual shall be prepared for all newly created or replaced onsite impervious areas, impervious frontage, and required offsite improvements. The SWQMP shall be submitted for approval with the final improvement and grading plans. The SWQMP shall include treatment and hydromodification calculations, post-construction storm water treatment measures, and maintenance requirements and responsibilities both for onsite treatment and also any “Green Street” facilities located in the public right-of-way. The SWQMP shall demonstrate how proposed proprietary best management practices meet bio-filtration treatment requirements in accordance with the City’s Storm Water Design Manual.

6. All site drainage with emphasis on the parking and driveway areas shall be treated to remove expected contaminants using a high efficiency non-mechanical method of treatment. The City highly encourages the use of bio-retention areas as the primary method of storm water retention and treatment. The landscape plans will need to reflect these areas of storm water treatment.

7. The Developer will be required to have the current owner of the property sign, notarize, and record a Storm Water Control Facility Maintenance Agreement (SWCFMA). This recorded SWCFMA shall be referenced in the CC&Rs.

8. The Developer’s engineer shall design and the Developer shall construct any permeable surfaces proposed for the project to the specifications of the County of San Diego Green Streets manual in effect at the time the grading permits are issued. All permeable surfaces within the project footprint that are subject to vehicular traffic shall be designed for H20 loading.

9. The property owners shall perpetually maintain any permeable surfaces in accordance to the standards established by the County of San Diego Green Streets manual in effect at the time the grading permits are issued. City shall have the right to inspect all permeable surfaces as needed to ensure they function as designed. City shall have the right to require qualified thirdparty testing at the property owner’s expense when surface failure is suspected. Contractor qualifications are outlined in the County of SD Green Streets manual. The project owner will be required to repair or reinstall the permeable surface for all failing surfaces to County of SD Green Streets manual standards in place at the time of the grading permit. In the event of failure to maintain the permeable pavers system that result in not functioning as designed, the project owner will be responsible to replace the pervious pavers system with an alternate method of storm water treatment system or will be required to transition the project to a priority storm water development project by complying with the applicable requirements, including development of a Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the installation of structural best management practices.

WATER SUPPLY
1772
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

1. The proposed project is located within the Rincon Del Diablo water service area. The Developer is required to consult with Rincon Del Diablo Water District regarding required water improvements.

2. Fire hydrants together with an adequate water supply shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire Marshal. Fire hydrants shall connect to a minimum 8-inch water main.

SEWER

1. The Developer is required at their sole expense to design and construct an on-site 8-inch public PVC sewer main. The on-site sewer main shall connect to the existing 12-inch sewer main in Bernardo Avenue.

2. No trees or deep-rooted bushes shall be planted within 15-feet of any sewer main or within 10- feet of any sewer lateral. Sewer laterals shall be 5-feet horizontally clear from other utilities.

3. All sewer laterals shall be considered a private sewer system. The property owner shall be responsible for all maintenance of sewer laterals to the public sewer main.

4. Any sewer mains, laterals, and appurtenances shall be designed and constructed per current City of Escondido Design Standards and Standard Drawings, and to the satisfaction of the Utilities Engineer.

5. The project design shall be such that all existing or new sewer manholes are accessible at all times by City Vactor trucks for maintenance.

6. The Developer shall cap and plug at the public sewer main all sewer lines and laterals to be abandoned, to the satisfaction of the Utilities Engineer and the City Inspector.

7. The location of all sewer laterals shall be shown on the grading and improvement plans.

8. All public sewer mains shall be located in the right-of-way or within a minimum 15-foot public utility easement (PUE). Private storm drains, private utilities and permanent structures are not allowed within the PUE.

LANDSCAPE

1. A site landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department with the second submittal of the grading plan for review and approval by Engineering and Planning Departments. The initial submittal of the landscape plans shall include the required plan check fees.

FINAL MAP - EASEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS

1. All existing and proposed easements, both private and public, affecting subject property shall be shown and clearly labeled on the Final Map and all applicable plan sets. 1773
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

2. The Developer shall make all necessary dedications for public right-of-way along the project’s frontages on the following public streets to bring these public roadways to the indicated City Classifications:

STREET CLASSIFICATION
Bernardo Avenue Local Collector
Hamilton Lane Local Collector

3. The Developer shall dedicate on the final map, a 20-foot radius corner rounding at the project’s northwest corner (SE corner of Hamilton Ln. and Bernardo Ave.)

4. 43-foot-wide private access easements covering the project’s private road shall be proposed on the final map to be granted to the Home Owner’s Association upon future transfer of title.

5. 10-foot minimum width private drainage easements covering all private drainage and stormwater basins and facilities shall be proposed on the final map to be granted to the Home Owner’s Association upon future transfer of title.

6. A 20-foot minimum width public utility easement across Lots 1 and 2 centered over the proposed public sewer main extension into the project from Bernardo Avenue shall be granted to the City on the final map.

7. A 43-foot-wide public utility easement and emergency access easement overlaying the project’s private road shall be granted to the City on the final map.

8. The Developer is responsible for making the arrangements to quitclaim any easements of record which conflict with the proposed development prior to approval of the final map. If an easement of record contains an existing utility that must remain in service, proof of arrangements to quitclaim the easement once new utilities are constructed must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to approval of the Final Map. Building permits will not be issued for lots in which construction will conflict with existing easements or utilities, nor will any securities be released until the existing easements are quitclaimed.

REPAYMENTS AND FEES

1. A cash security shall be posted to pay any costs incurred by the City to clean-up eroded soils and debris, repair damage to public or private property and improvements, install new BMPs, and stabilize and/or close-up a non-responsive or abandoned project. Any moneys used by the City for cleanup or damage will be drawn from this security and the grading permit will be revoked by written notice to the Developer until the required cash security is replaced. The cleanup cash security shall be released upon final acceptance of the grading and improvements for this project. The amount of the cash security shall be 10% of the total estimated cost of the grading, drainage, landscaping, and best management practices items of work with a minimum of $5,000 up to a maximum of $50,000, unless a higher amount is deemed necessary by the City Engineer.

2. A Hamilton Lane Storm Drain Repayment in the approximate current** amount of $82,396 ($39,236 per acre) per City Ordinance 91-26 is due to the City of Escondido for reimbursement towards previously constructed drainage improvements that protect this property. 1774
Item9.

Resolution No. 2026-90
Exhibit “F”

** This Hamilton Storm Drain Repayment Basin fee is subject to an 8% annual increase every July 1 st
.

3. A sewer repayment of $3,823.58 per City Resolution 96-16 is due to the City of Escondido for existing sewer improvements that will serve this development

4. The Developer shall be required to pay all development fees of the City then in effect at the time, and in such amounts as may prevail when building permits are issued.

UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AND RELOCATION

1. All existing overhead utilities within the subdivision boundary or along fronting streets shall be relocated underground as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The developer may request a waiver of this condition by writing a letter to the City Engineer explaining his/her reasons for requesting the waiver. The developer will be required to pay a waiver fee as adopted by City Council resolution.

2. The Developer shall sign a written agreement stating that he has made all such arrangements as may be necessary to coordinate and provide utility construction, relocation and undergrounding. All new utilities shall be constructed underground.

CC&R’s

1. Copies of the CC&R’s shall be submitted to the Engineering Department and Planning Department for approval and shall be recorded prior to approval and recording of the Final Map.

2. The Developer shall make provisions in the CC&R’s for maintenance by the Home Owners’ Association of the private street, private storm water and drainage facilities, private street lighting, landscaping both onsite and within fronting public right-of-ways. These provisions must be approved by the Engineering Department prior to approval of the Final Map.

3. The CC&R’s must state that the Home Owners’ Association assumes liability for damage and repair to City utilities in the event that damage is caused by the property owners’ association when repair or replacement of private utilities is done.

4. The CC&R’s must state that (if stamped concrete is used in the private driveway) the homeowners’ association is responsible for replacing the stamped concrete in kind if the City has to trench the street for repair or replacement of an existing utility. 1775
Item9.

KEYCONSENT CALENDAR CURRENT BUSINESS

PUBLIC HEARING WORKSHOP PROCLAMATION
8/12/2026
CONSENT CALENDAR - (J. GOULART) - APPROVED OF CHANGE ORDER NO 1 IN SUPPORT OF THE CCAE KITCHEN SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND CONSENT CALENDAR - (K. SNYDER) - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO AUTHORIZING THE RECEIPT OF GRANT FUNDS AND EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENTS AND FORMS FOR THE PROJECT BPMP-5081(032) CITY WIDE BRIDE MAINTENANCE PROJECT CURRENT BUSINESS - (M. MCGUINNESS) - ENTERING INTO A GROUND LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO AND COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION CURRENT BUSINESS - (C. MCKINNEY) - RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A CONCEPTUAL PROPOSAL BY “LOVE ESCO” FOR DONATION OF DESIGN SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AND MATERIAL FOR CITY PARK FACILITIES AT “HERITAGE GARDEN” POCKET PARK IN DOWNTOWN ESCONDIDO WORKSHOP - (K. SNYDER) – ESCONDIDO 2040 EFFORTS-TO-DATE (LRP TEAM) 8/19/2026 - NO MEETING

1776
Item10.