Slope failues rarely present a threat to human life, but often result in a disruption of everyday services, including emergency response capabilities. Landslides can block transportation routes, dam creeks and drainages, and contaminate water supplies. When these hazards affect transportation routes, they are frequently expensive to clean-up and can have significant economic impacts on the county. (United States Geological Survey, 2004)
The four most common types of slope failure (landslide, mudflow and debris flow, rockfall, and alluvial fans) are briefly described below.
Landslide
The many types of landslides are categorized based on form and type of movement. They range from slow - moving rotational slumps and earth flows, which can distress structures over time but are less threatening to personal safety, to fast-moving rock avalanches and debris flows that are a serious threat to structures and have been responsible for most fatalities during landslide events. Many large landslides are complex and a combination of more than one landslide type. (United States Geological Survey, n.d.) Mudflow and Debris Flow
When slope material becomes saturated with water, a debris flow may develop. Debris flows can also occur from horizontal seismic inertia forces induced in a slope from ground shaking. From a geologic perspective, there are generally two types of debris flows: debris flows related to shallow landslides and post-wildfire debris flows. (United States Geological Survey, 2005)
Debris flows related to shallow landslides occur on hillslopes due to soil failure in which soil liquefies and runs downhill. This type of debris flow generally results from a shallow landslide (less than 10 to 15 feet deep) and has a discrete initiation zone and depositional area. Shallow landslides tend to occur in winter but are most likely after prolonged periods of heavy rainfall when soil materials are saturated. Debris flows are typically more dangerous because they are fast-moving, causing both property damage and loss of life. (Id.)
Post-wildfire debris flows are a result of post-fire conditions, where burned soil surfaces enhance rainfall runoff that concentrates in a channel and picks up debris as it moves. The post-fire debris flow has a less discrete initiation zone but is similar to a debris flow derived from hillslopes in that it may result in inundation and a detrimental impact on lives and property within its zone of runout and deposition. It can also result in downstream flooding. (Id.)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 274 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 231 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-172
Rockfall
Rockfall is the falling of a newly detached mass of rock from a cliff or rock outcrop, or a loose rock that erodes out of unconsolidated debris on a hillside and rolls or falls down a very steep slope. Over-steepened slopes, like those along roadcuts or in glaciated terrain, are susceptible to rockfall due to the steep slopes that are not highly vegetated or benched, which help attenuate rockfall. Rock outcrops that are highly fractured or undercut by weaker rock layers are also susceptible to rockfall. (CGS, 2020) Alluvial Fan
Alluvial fans consist of sediment deposits leftover from a flood event. The sediment is carried by a flood and distributed in a fan-like shape. Alluvial fans represent a high risk of natural hazards in the form of debris flows as the deposited soil remains unstable after the flood event. Alluvial fan channels are located on footslope landforms in the transition space between valley floodplains and steep mountain slopes and are preceded by high-gradient, contained channels. Coarse material deposits are formed by the rapid change in transport capacity as the high energy mountain slope streams spill onto the valley floor. Riparian areas resemble the shape of the landform, which is narrow at the apex and broader at the bottom where the fan widens. (United States Department of Agriculture)
4.5.6.1 Plans, Policies, and Regulatory Environment
Solano County General Plan
The 2008 Solano County General Plan includes a number of policies in the Health and Safety Element which are meant to aid in mitigating for slope failure. These policies require new development in areas with known slope instability to consider risks in their plans and mitigate against these risks by making soil information readily available, minimizing development in these areas, and adapting structural designs to local soil conditions.
Design Guidelines for Site Grading in Solano County Code, § 26-73.1 The Solano County Code discusses the regulation of site grading requirements for subdivisions. The guidelines include, but are not limited to, a requirement that building pads be situated on slopes not exceeding a 25 percent grade, as well as instructions to avoid grading in order to achieve flat areas atop ridge lines and knolls.
General Design Principles and Standards in Solano County Code, § 31-30 The Solano County Code includes design principles and standards for grading, drainage, land leveling, and erosion control. Its design principles and standards require finished slopes, for both cut and fill, to not be steeper than a ratio of two horizontal feet to one vertical foot (2:1) unless a thorough geological and engineering analysis finds that steeper slopes are stable. Appropriate erosion control measures are also specified.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 275 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 232 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-173
4.5.6.2 Past Events
The majority of landslides in the unincorporated areas of Solano County have happened during the late fall and early spring seasons. Landslides are typically caused by severe weather events in the county. There have been no federally-declared landslide events in Solano County. During the fall through spring rainy seasons of 1968 to 1969, 1972 to 1973, 1981 to 1982, and 1997 to 1998, landslides were widespread throughout the county. Between 1968 to 2007, 51 recorded historical damaging landslide events occurred in Solano County. Additionally in 2006, a mudslide event occurred in the county affecting Clayton Road, Gibson Canyon, and Lynch Canyon. (Solano HMP, 2014)
4.5.6.3 Location
The best available predictor of where slope failure might occur is the location of past movements. Past landslides can be recognized by their distinctive topographic shapes, which can remain in place for thousands of years. Most landslides recognizable in this fashion range from a few acres to several square miles. Most show no evidence of recent movement and are not currently active. A small proportion of them may become active in any given year, with movements concentrated within all or part of the landslide masses or around the periphery.
Recognizing ancient dormant mass movement sites is important to identify current areas susceptible to flows and slides because they can be reactivated by earthquakes or by exceptionally wet weather. Those ancient scars also consist of broken materials, frequently involve disruption of groundwater flow, and are vulnerable to construction-triggered sliding.
Solano County will be at increased risk from future landslides and debris flows due to recent large wildfires in the hilly northwestern portions of unincorporated Solano County. Debris flows in these areas are projected to occur at a degree of probability ranging from 60 to 100 percent in certain basins. (Watershed Emergency Response Team, 2020)
Figure 4-60 shows low, moderate, and high landslide risk exposure. The map depicts a general characteristic of higher risk throughout the county. This map should be used with caution, as site-specific conditions can make some locations in low to moderate instability areas highly unstable and some high instability locations more stable. Geotechnical investigation is often required to determine the stability of a given site.
4.5.6.4 Frequency and Probability of Future Occurrences Slope failures are most frequently triggered in periods of high rainfall. The hazard is greatest in areas with steep slopes, although landslides may occur on slopes of 15 percent or less under certain conditions. Slope steepness and underlying soils are the most important factors affecting the landslide hazard. However, surface and subsurface drainage patterns also have an affect, and vegetation removal can increase the likelihood of a landslide. (United States Geological Survey, 2004) FINAL for adoption Packet Page 276 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 233 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-174
Slope failures are often triggered by other natural hazards, such as earthquakes, heavy rain, floods, or wildfires. Consequently, landslide frequency is often related to the frequency of these other hazards. The probability of slope failure occurring in Solano County is likely, between a 10 and 100 percent annual probability.
4.5.6.5 Severity and Extent
The severity of landslide problems depends upon the local bedrock and soil conditions, including moisture content, slope, and vegetation. Small landslides are common in the mountain areas of the county as loose material moves naturally down slope or fires cause loss of soil-stabilizing vegetative cover. In addition, many human activities tend to make earth material less stable and, thus, increase the chance of slope failure. Some of the natural non-seismic causes of ground instability are lakeshore erosion, heavy rainfall, and poor-quality natural materials (e.g., gravel or sand). Human activities contribute to soil instability through grading of steep slopes, overloading them with artificial fill, extensive irrigation, construction of impermeable surfaces, excessive groundwater withdrawal, and removal of stabilizing vegetation. (USGS, 2020)
4.5.6.6 Warning Time
Some geologic hazards occur slowly but can have significant property or health consequences, like erosion and some forms of slope movement or land sliding. The identification of those hazards generally takes site- specific analysis to determine if the soils and geology are susceptible to these hazards and what mitigation is most relevant and prudent. For these types of hazards, warning time is long.
For other hazards, such as debris flows, rockfalls, and landslides, warning time is often short and may not occur at all. Identifying areas where these events are known to have occurred or which have ideal characteristics for these hazards to occur could help with hazard preparedness when triggering-type events like intense rainfall occur. This identification will not increase the warning time, but it will make proactive response and mitigation to potential triggering events more effective. (Manconi, 2016)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 277 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 234 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-175
Figure 4-60: Landslide Risk Exposure
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 278 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 235 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-176
4.5.6.7 Secondary Hazards
There are some hazards that can trigger or exacerbate slope failure. Flooding, for example, can erode and undercut the toe of a slope, removing the support for that slope and causing a landslide or rockfall. Wildfires create an immediate hazard of their own and create long-term impacts by altering the soil structure, impeding its ability to absorb moisture, and destroying vegetation that binds the soil with roots and absorbs rainfall and runoff with foliage. Post wildfire, even small rainfall events can create devastating mudflows, debris flows, or landslides. Areas that are mapped currently as low to moderate risk of these hazards may have high risk after a wildfire.
4.5.6.8 Slope Failure Vulnerability Assessment
Figure 4-61 displays the Snapshot Map of slope failure susceptibility for population and infrastructure in Solano County. This section discusses exposure to this vulnerability.
Population
An estimated 7,126 persons, or approximately 36 percent of the county population, are exposed to slope failure areas, as shown in Table 4-58. Population estimates within slope failure areas were generated by analyzing County Assessor and parcel data that intersect with landslide hazard areas identified by California Geological Survey. U.S. Census Bureau information was then used to intersect slope failure hazards with an estimate of the population using GIS, calculated by weighting the population within each census block and track with the percentage of slope hazard areas.
Table 4-58: Population Exposure to Landslide Susceptibility Total Population
Unincorporated County 19,665
Landslide Susceptibility Population Count % of Total
High 1,767 8.98%
Moderate 3,261 16.58%
Low 2,098 10.67%
Total 7,126 36.23%
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 279 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 236 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-177
Figure 4-61: Landslide Risk Exposure Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 280 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 237 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-178
Property
Table 4-59 shows the number of parcels, market value exposure, and content value exposure in the steep- slope risk areas. The predominant zoning classes within these areas are single-family, vacant, and manufactured homes. Low-income housing may be located in areas at higher risk of slope failure, which may disproportionately impact low-income property owners who cannot afford areas at lesser risk.
Table 4-59: Property Value Exposed to Landslides
Total Parcels
Total Market
Value ($)
Total Content
Value ($) Total Value ($)
Unincorporated County 6,668 $3,186,640,275 $2,078,097,240 $5,264,737,515
Landslide Susceptibility Parcel Count % of Total Market Value Exposure ($)
Content Value
Exposure ($) Total Exposure ($) % of Total
Low 775 11.6% $386,667,089 $212,333,302 $599,000,391 11.4% Moderate 978 14.7% $462,229,899 $248,587,504 $710,817,403 13.5% High 428 6.4% $271,387,583 $141,217,211 $412,604,794 7.8% Total 2,181 32.7% $1,120,284,571 $602,138,017 $1,722,422,589 32.7%
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Several types of infrastructure are exposed to mass movements, including transportation, water, sewer, and power infrastructure. At this time, all infrastructure and transportation corridors identified as exposed to the slope failure hazard are considered vulnerable until more information becomes available. Table 4-60 and Table 4-61 summarize the critical facilities exposed to the slope failure hazard.
Table 4-60: Critical Facility Points with Slope Failure Hazard Risk (Unincorporated County) Critical Infrastructure - Landslide Susceptibility
Infrastructure Type High Moderate Low
Essential Facility - 3 4
EOC - - -
Law Enforcement - - -
Fire Station - 3 4
Emergency Services - - -
Hospital - - -
High Potential Loss 6 25 6
Dam 4 3 -
Historic Building - 1 1
Library - - -
School - 1 -
Historic Site - - -
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 281 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 238 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-179
Critical Infrastructure - Landslide Susceptibility
Infrastructure Type High Moderate Low
Community Center - - -
Jurisdiction Real Property Asset* - - -
Park - 2 -
Wastewater Treatment Facility - - -
Emergency Shelter - 1 -
Administrative - - -
Child Care Facility - 1 -
Healthcare Facility - - -
Senior Center - - -
County Real Property Asset* 2 16 5
Early Learning - - -
Transportation and Lifeline 107 171 1157
Airport - - -
Bridge 2 63 1
Power Plant 1 - 11
Substation - 2 7
Bus Facility - - -
NG Station - 2 14
Bus Stop - 1 -
Railway Bridge - - 1
Cell Tower 5 - 9
Breakout Tank - - -
Oil Facility - - -
Transmission Line Tower 79 103 245
Wind Turbine 20 - 869
Ferry - - -
Amtrak Station - - -
Train Station - - -
Hazmat 2 7 23
Hazmat 2 7 23
Hazardous Waste facility - - 1
Grand Total 115 206 1190
*Note: Real Property Assets are digitized insurance rolls for demonstrating value and ownership and may have overlapping points with other categories such as fire stations and law enforcement.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 282 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 239 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-180
Table 4-61: Critical Facilities (Linear) with Slope Failure Hazard Risk (Unincorporated County) Lifelines (miles) - Landslide Susceptibility
Infrastructure Type (Linear) High Moderate Low
Bus Route 5.6 15.9 3.5
Levee (FEMA) 1.0 104.4 1.3
Levee Flood Wall - - -
Levee Cross Section - 0.3 -
NG Pipeline 9.3 14.2 61.1
Railroad 0.8 7.3 0.7
Street 106.0 397.0 338.7
4WD trail 1.9 4.1 3.4
Alley - - -
Cul-de-sac 0.1 0.1 0.2
Driveway 15.1 40.3 93.8
Ferry - 0.0 -
Interstate 3.8 12.7 2.2
Local road 54.6 228.0 154.0
Local road, major 25.6 70.1 58.0
Primary highway - - -
Ramp 0.1 4.0 0.4
Service road - 0.1 0.3
State/county highway 4.7 35.8 25.2
Traffic circle - 0.0 0.0
Walkway 0.1 1.7 1.3
Transmission Line 26.6 37.5 55.6
Grand Total 149.3 576.7 460.8
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 283 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 240 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-181
Lifelines
A significant amount of linear infrastructure (or lifelines) can be exposed to slope failure and mass movements:
▪ Roads: Access to major roads is crucial to life-safety, response, and recovery operations after a disaster event. Slope failures can block egress and ingress on roads, causing isolation for neighborhoods, traffic problems, and delays for public and private transportation. This can result in economic losses for businesses.
▪ Bridges: Slope failures can significantly impact bridges, by knocking out bridge abutments or significantly weaken the soil supporting them.
▪ Power Lines: Power lines are generally elevated above steep slopes, but the towers supporting them can be subject to slope failures. A landslide could trigger the failure of the soil underneath a tower, causing it to collapse and rip down the lines. Power and communication failures then create problems for vulnerable populations and businesses.
4.5.6.9 Future Trends in Development
Solano County is equipped to
handle future growth within
landslide hazard areas. The 2008
Solano County General Plan
addresses development in areas
susceptible to slope failure, and
the County Code implements the
grading ordinance and other
protective measures.
Following the 2020 Hennessey
Fire, part of the larger LNU
Lightning Complex, areas of the
county are more vulnerable to
increased runoff and post-fire
rockfalls and debris flows. The
Middle and Lower Putah Creek
and Ulatis Creek-Alamo Creek watersheds are particularly vulnerable. Much of the threat from debris flows exists in areas already in high or medium landslide susceptibility, and the County will focus mitigation on those high priority areas. Figure 4-62 depicts landslide prevention measures that are being enacted in areas which have recently been impacted by wildfires.
Figure 4-62: Landslide Prevention Post-Wildfire
Source: The San Francisco Gate
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 284 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 241 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-182
4.5.6.10 Slope Failure Hazard Problem Statements
As part of the mitigation action identification process, the Planning Committee for the county and for each jurisdiction identified issues and weaknesses, also called problem statements, for their respective facilities.
Identification was based on the risk assessment and vulnerability analysis utilizing the RAMP mapping tool and slope failure hazard data. Slope failure hazard problem statements for the county are listed in Table 4-62; problem statements for all other participating jurisdictions are accessed in Volume 2 of this plan.
Identifying these common issues and weaknesses assists the Planning Committee in understand the realm of resources needed for mitigation. The goal is to have at least one mitigation action for every problem statement. See Table 5-6 for a full list of mitigation actions and corresponding problem statements that they address. Each problem statement is coded with a problem number for cross-referencing between Table 4-62 and Table 5-6.
Table 4-62 Slope Failure Problem Statements
Problem
No.
Hazard
Type
Area of
Concern
Mitigation
Alternatives
Primary
Agency Problem Description Related MA
ps-SF-SC-
132
Slope
Failure
Impact SP - Structural
Projects
Solano
County
There are 5 County bridges located in a
high landslide risk area.
ma-SF-SC-175
ps-SF-SC-
133
Slope
Failure
Victim PPRO - Property
Protection ,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness , SP
- Structural
Projects
Solano
County
There are approximately 1,641 people in
the Unicorp. County living in a high
landslide risk area.
ma-AH-SC-5,
ma-AH-SC-9,
ma-AH-SC-7
ps-SF-SC-
134
Slope
Failure
Victim PPRO - Property
Protection ,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness , SP
- Structural
Projects
Solano
County
There are 2 child-care facilities located
in high landslide risk area in the
Unicorporated County.
ma-AH-SC-14,
ma-SF-SC-176
ps-SF-SC-
135
Slope
Failure
Threat PRV -
Prevention ,
PPRO - Property
Protection ,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness , SP
- Structural
Projects
Solano
County
The 2020 LNU lightning complex fire
has created new areas that are
susceptible to slope failure. Further
investigation is needed.
ma-SF-SC-177
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 285 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 242 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-183
Climate Change Hazard Profile
Climate change refers to any distinct change in measures of climate lasting for a long period of time, more specifically major changes in temperature, rainfall, snow, or wind patterns. Climate change may be limited to a specific region or may occur across the whole Earth. Climate change may result from:
▪ Natural factors, such as changes in the sun’s energy or slow changes in the Earth’s orbit around the sun;
▪ Natural processes within the climate system, such as changes in ocean circulation; or ▪ Human activities that change the atmosphere’s make-up and the land surface, such as burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests, planting trees, or building developments in cities and suburbs.
Changes in extreme weather and climate events, like heatwaves and droughts, are the primary way that most people experience climate change. Human-induced climate change has already increased the number and strength of these extreme events. Over the last 50 years, much of the United States has seen increases in prolonged periods of excessively high temperatures, heavy downpours, severe floods, and droughts. (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2021)
The effects of climate change are varied and include extremes in precipitation and temperature. Slower average increases in temperature, precipitation, and sea-level rise can result in compounding impacts, such as ocean acidification, increases insect outbreaks, and shifts in biological patterns, to name a few. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2014) Table 4-63 is a list of localized climate change impacts relevant to California’s Bay Area Delta and the reference to where it is addressed in this MJHMP. Sea-level rise has the potential to inundate homes, businesses, and infrastructure and cause erosion near shorelines and in delta areas of rivers, including southern parts of Solano County and the Cities of Vallejo, Benicia, Suisun City, and Fairfield.
Table 4-63: Climate Change-Related Hazards and Cross-References in MJHMP Climate change hazard Reference in MJHMP
Agriculture and Forestry Pests and Diseases Section 4.5.1 (Sudden Oak Death in Wildfire Profile) Drought Section 4.5.5 (Drought Hazard Profile)
Extreme Heat Section 4.5.7.5 (Climate Change Severity & Extent) Inland and Shoreline Flooding Section 4.5.2 (Flood Hazard Profile) Landslides and Debris Flows Section 4.5.6 (Slope Hazard Profile) Sea-Level Rise Section 4.5.7 (Sea-Level Rise)
Extreme Weather Section 4.5.4 (Extreme Weather Hazard Profile) Wildfire Section 4.5.1 (Wildfire Hazard Profile)
California is already experiencing the impacts of climate change, including prolonged drought, increased coastal flooding and erosion, and tree mortality. The state has also seen increased average temperatures, more extreme heat days, fewer cold nights, a lengthening of the growing season, shifts in the water cycle FINAL for adoption Packet Page 286 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 243 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-184
with less winter precipitation falling as snow, a decreased summertime fog of 33 percent, and both snowmelt and rainwater running off sooner in the year. (Cal OES, 2018) Long term trends in fog depict a decline of some 12 to 20 percent in California from 1900 through 2070. Climate experts suggest that warmer temperatures resulting from climate change create conditions where air fails to reach cool enough temperatures necessary for the production of fog. Warmer temperatures are simultaneously able to evaporate any fog which is able to form. (Grantham, Teodore; University of California, Berkeley, 2018)
The intensity of extreme weather events is also increasing. Extreme weather events and resulting hazards, such as heatwaves, wildfires, droughts, and floods, are already being experienced. (Leah Fisher, Sonya Ziaja, 2018, p. 22) The vulnerability analysis herein touches on extreme weather impacts from climate change.
Sea-Level Rise
This climate change hazard profile includes sea-level rise as a subhazard for Solano County and for the Cities of Vallejo, Benicia, Suisun City, and Fairfield. Sea-level rise has delineated hazard boundaries and quantifiable exposure and damage estimations. Sea-level rise is called out within each subsection of this climate change hazard profile.
Sea-level rise, a direct result of climate change, affects communities in the Northern California Coastal Area and Bay Area Delta. Sea-level rise has the potential to inundate homes, businesses, and infrastructure located near the shorelines, as well as to cause erosion of coastal lands over time. The sea level rose during the 20th century, and observations and projections suggest that it will rise at a higher rate during the 21st century. Rising seas increase the risk of coastal flooding, storm surge inundation, coastal erosion and shoreline retreat, and wetland loss. The cities and infrastructure that line many coasts are already vulnerable to damage from storms, which will likely increase as the sea level continues to rise and inundate areas further inland.
This MJHMP highlights sea-level rise within the climate change section because this hazard has delineated hazard boundaries and quantifiable exposure and damage estimations directly related to climate change.
Methodology for Predicting Climate Change Impacts
Climate change impacts will vary depending on the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and atmospheric GHG concentrations may change over time. Various climate models explore a range of emission scenarios globally. There are six representative GHG emission scenarios, called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). The three most used representative scenarios include a low-end scenario of GHG emissions (RCP2.6), which incorporates strong GHG emission reductions now and in the future, a moderate scenario (RCP4.5), which incorporates stabilizing GHG emissions through 2050, and a high-end (RCP8.5), which maintains a fossil fuel-intensive, “business-as-usual” emission scenario.
Mapping in this HMP uses the moderate RCP 4.5 emissions scenario and the high emissions RCP 8.5 scenario to consider both the ramifications of a worst-case scenario for adaptive planning and to consider FINAL for adoption Packet Page 287 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 244 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-185
how curbing emissions might reduce the most dramatic consequences. (OPR Planning and Investing for a Resilient California, p. 19)
4.5.7.1 Policies, Plans, and Regulatory Environment
Successful efforts to address the challenges of climate change begin at the local level and include the implementation of environmentally sustainable practices designed to meet present and future energy needs.
2019 California Green Building Standards
Solano County has adopted the 2019 California Green Building Standards, also known as the CALGreen Code.
The CALGreen Code establishes regulations for green building for both nonresidential and residential condtruction. Topics covered in the regulations include planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, material conservation and resource efficiency, and environmental quality. The code also includes voluntary measures for residential and nonresidential buildings and health facilities.
California Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Sustainable Communities Act, SB 375, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) looks to reduce GHG emissions through coordinated transportation and land use planning with the goal of more sustainable communities. Regional targets are established for GHG emissions reductions from passenger vehicle use by the sustainable communities strategy (SCS) established by each metropolitan planning organization (MPO). The SCS is an integral part of regional transportation plans (RTP) and contains land use, housing, and transportation strategies to meet GHG reductions targets.
2018 California Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance The 2018 California Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance document provides an overview of the best available science on sea-level rise for California, and recommended methodology for addressing sea-level rise in Coastal Commission planning and regulatory actions. It is intended to serve as a multi- purpose resource for a variety of audiences and includes a high level of detail on many subjects. 2018 California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment
California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment promotes actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a diverse number of sectors. The Fourth Assessment provides information in a number of ways. Regional reports summarize climate impacts and adaptation needs around the state as a resolution useful for local decision-makers. Statewide impacts are summarized in the Statewide Summary Report, as well as reports on Tribal and Indigenous Communities, Climate Justice, and California’s Ocean and Coast. The Technical Reports are the foundation of the Fourth Assessment and include climate projections and analyses of expected impacts in various sectors across the state.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 288 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 245 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-186
2020 California Adaptation Planning Guide (APG)
California has been taking action to address climate change for over 20 years, focusing on both GHG reduction and adaptation. The California Adaptation Planning Guide (APG) provides guidance and support for communities addressing the unavoidable consequences of climate change. The 2020 APG presents an updated, step-by-step process that communities can use to plan for climate change.
California Senate Bill 379: General Plan Safety Element and Climate Adaption California Senate Bill 379 requires all cities and counties to include climate adaptation and resiliency strategies in the Safety Elements of their General Plans upon the next revision, beginning January 1, 2017.
The bill requires the climate adaptation update to include a set of goals, policies, and objectives for their communities based on the vulnerability assessment, as well as implementation measures, including the conservation and implementation of natural infrastructure that may be used in adaptation projects.
California Senate Bill 1000: General Plan Safety and Environmental Justice Elements Senate Bill 1000 requires local governments to include an Environmental Justice element in General Plans. It has four basic requirements, whether those requirements are combined into a single Environmental Justice element or distributed throughout other existing elements, including:
▪ Identifying disadvantaged communities;
▪ Incorporating policies to reduce the environmental health impacts that adversely affect residents in disadvantaged communities;
▪ Incorporating policies to include residents of disadvantaged communities in decision-making processes; and
▪ Incorporating policies that prioritize improvements and projects in disadvantaged communities.
California Assembly Bill 2516: Database for Sea-Level Rise Planning Assembly Bill 2516 was passed in 2014 and directed the Natural Resources Agency, in collaboration with the Ocean Protection Council, to conduct biannual surveys of sea-level rise planning information to catalog California’s efforts to prepare for rising sea levels. The resources collected in service to this task include studies, vulnerability assessments, and local coastal programs. The future collection of resources will be stored in the Adaption Clearinghouse.
Delta Adapts: Creating a Climate Resilient Future
The Delta Stewardship Council recently developed a vulnerability assessment for climate change for the broader Sacrament- San Joaquin Delta region, completed June 2021. The plan, titled Delta Adapts: Creating a Climate Resilient Future, was developed to enhance the Council’s understanding of regionally specific climate change vulnerabilities and risks and address how Delta communities, infrastructure, and ecosystems can adapt to future conditions. The plan’s planning horizon is through 2100 while also incorporating a 2050 planning increment as used by the Delta Plan.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 289 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 246 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-187
County of Solano 2011 Climate Action Plan
Solano County published a 2011 Climate Action Plan (CAP) as a requirement of their 2008 General Plan, which mandates a CAP and a Sea-Level Rise Strategic Plan. The primary objective of the CAP is to address climate change and reduce the community’s GHG emissions at a more local level. The plan recommends 31 measures and 94 implementation actions which the county can use to reduce emissions. As part of the general objective of the CAP, Solano County has set a goal to reduce county-wide GHG emissions by 20 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.
County of Solano 2011 Sea-Level Rise Strategic Program
Solano County created a Sea-Level Rise Strategic Program (SLRSP) consistent with its 2008 General Plan Health and Safety Element. The SLRSP examines potential impacts from sea-level rise on Solano County, including impacts to more specific properties and resources susceptible to sea-level rise. It also provides protection and adaptation strategies.
Solano County General Plan
The 2008 Solano County General Plan includes a number of goals and policies in the Public Health and Safety Element to mitigate the effects of Climate Change. These goals and policies encourage greater awareness of human caused climate change, in addition to preparation and adaptation to the effects of climate change.
4.5.7.2 Past Events
Climate change has never been directly responsible for any declared disasters. Past flooding, wildfire, extreme weather, and drought disasters may have been exacerbated by climate change, but it is difficult to make direct connections to individual disasters. Hazard profiles for flood, wildfire, extreme weather, and drought include information on past events that show an increase in occurrences in many instances, especially considering wildfire, extreme heat, and drought events.
Climate change is an on-going hazard, and many communities are already experiencing the effects. Other effects may not be seriously experienced for decades or may be avoided altogether by mitigation actions taken today.
Sea-Level Rise
Historic records from the San Francisco tidal gage, CA Station ID: 9414290, show that the sea level in the San Francisco Bay has risen eight inches from 1897 to 2006. Similarly, water level measurements from the tidal gage at Port Chicago, CA Station ID: 9415144, show an increase in mean sea level of 2.08 millimeters a year, which is equivalent to a change of 8.6 inches in 100 years. Communities in Solano County report increased damage from king tide events, especially when paired with heavy rain, and community members are attributing these changes to sea-level rise.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 290 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 247 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-188
4.5.7.3 Location
The effects of climate change are not limited by geographical borders; the entire county is subject to various effects of climate change which may differ by location. Each jurisdiction explored impacts of climate change specific to that jurisdiction. For example, municipalities bordering the San Joaquin Bay will experience sea-level rise impacts, while northwesterly parts of the county may face increased wildfire dangers.
Sea-Level Rise
Sea-level rise varies greatly depending on a number of factors. Globally, sea level is rising primarily because global temperatures are rising, causing ocean water to expand and land ice to melt. However, sea-level rise varies from place to place. Along the Pacific coast, sea-level rise depends on the global mean sea-level rise and also on regional factors, including ocean and atmospheric circulation patterns in the northern Pacific Ocean, gravitational and deformational effects of land ice mass changes, and tectonics along the coast. The comparative importance of these factors determines whether local sea level is higher or lower than the global mean, and how fast it is changing, which has enormous implications for coastal planning. (National Research Council, 2012)
Sea-level rise within the Western Pacific is different than the global average. In some places within the Western Pacific, sea-level rise has been greater than 10 mm per year. In other places, such as in the Eastern Pacific, sea-level rise has been much less. The differences in rate and region are primarily associated with multi-decadal fluctuations that are linked with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), which has appeared to switch phases in the last couple of years. A PDO phase switch could signal the start of higher amounts of relative sea-level rise along the United States West Coast within the coming decades. This is a trend similar to the higher relative sea-level rise rates which have occurred in this region during portions of the last century. (NOAA, 2017)
For Solano County, sea-level rise will primarily affect the shoreline, tidal marsh areas, and wetlands along the border with the San Francisco Bay Area Delta. Some sea-level rise impacts are already being experienced in low lying municipal areas of Vallejo, Benicia, Suisun City, and Fairfield, especially during king tide events. Volume 1 herein describes sea-level rise for the county, while some participating jurisdictions prioritized sea-level rise in their annexes. Much of the Solano County border of the San Francisco Bay Area Delta is shallow marshland, and a large acreage of land could be inundated with small amounts of sea-level rise, as shown in Figure 4-63.
4.5.7.4 Frequency and Probability of Future Occurrences Climate change is one of the few natural hazards where the probability of occurrence is influenced by human action. In addition, unlike earthquakes and floods that occur over a finite time period, climate change is an ongoing hazard.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 291 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 248 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-189
Temperature-related impacts are the most likely near-term climate change exposure facing the county and should be addressed and prioritized in future adaptation planning efforts. While sea-level rise has a high certainty rating and is already occurring, its onset is not expected to occur until closer to the end of the century in terms of changes in areas already vulnerable to flooding or causing perman ent inundation in tidally-influenced areas of the county. (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, n.d.) California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (2018) delineates how climate change may impact and exacerbate natural hazards in the future, including wildfires, extreme heat, floods, drought, and levee failure:
▪ Climate change is expected to lead to increases in the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme heat events and heat waves in Solano County and the rest of California, which are likely to increase the risk of mortality and morbidity due to heat-related illness and exacerbation of existing chronic health conditions. Those most at risk and vulnerable to climate-related illness are the elderly; individuals with chronic conditions such as heart and lung disease, diabetes, and mental illnesses; infants; the socially or economically disadvantaged; and those who work outdoors. ▪ Higher temperatures will melt the Sierra snowpack earlier and drive the snowline higher, resulting in less snowpack to supply water to California users.
▪ Droughts are likely to become more frequent and persistent in the 21st century. ▪ Intense rainfall events, periodically ones with larger than historical runoff, will continue to affect California with more frequent and more extensive flooding. ▪ Storms and snowmelt may coincide and produce higher winter runoff from the landward side, while accelerating sea-level rise will produce higher storm surges during coastal storms. (California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment, 2018)
Warmer weather, reduced snowpack, and earlier snowmelt can be expected to increase wildfire through fuel hazards and ignition risks. These changes can also increase plant moisture stress and insect populations, both of which affect forest health and reduce forest resilience to wildfires. An increase in wildfire intensity and extent will increase public safety risks, property damage, fire suppression and emergency response costs, watershed and water quality impacts, vegetation conversions, and habitat fragmentation. Climate change is also predicted to increase frequency and probability of various hazards. Climate change impacts on frequency and severity are discussed in other hazard profiles.
Sea-Level Rise
The probability for sea-level rise varies depending on the amount of sea-level rise predicted. Global mean sea-level rise predictions vary from a low of 0.3 meters to a high of 2.5 meters. The probability of different levels of sea-level rise also depends on the amount of future GHG emissions and reductions made. Table 4-64 shows the probability of various levels of sea-level rise by 2100, based on three RCPs. Under a business- as-usual scenario, RCP 8.5, there is a 96 percent chance of global mean sea-level rise of 0.5 meters. With reduced emissions under RCP 4.5, that chance is reduced to 73 percent. The probability of a one-meter global rise in sea levels is 17 percent under RCP 8.5, decreasing to a three percent chance with emission reductions under RCP 4.5. The exposure and damage estimations for sea-level rise for Solano County are discussed further in the Vulnerability Assessment, Section 4.5.7.8.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 292 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 249 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-190
Table 4-64: Probability of Exceeding Global Mean Sea-level Rise (Median Value) Scenarios in 2100 GMSL Rise Scenario RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 8.5
Low (0.3 m) 94% 98% 100%
Intermediate-Low (0.5 m) 49% 73% 96%
Intermediate (1.0 m) 2% 3% 17%
Intermediate-High (1.5 m) 0.4% 0.5% 1.3%
High (2.0 m) 0.1% 0.1% 0.3%
Extreme (2.5 m) 0.05% 0.05% 0.1%
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (based upon Kopp et al. 2014).
4.5.7.5 Severity and Extent
Climate change severity and extent in Solano County is varied and can generally be categorized into several key effects. These effects are identified in the San Francisco Bay Area Region 9 Report from California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (2018). General climate change impacts for this North Coast Region include:
▪ Predicted annual maximum temperatures will increase by 4.2°F under the RCP 4.5 scenario and
7.2°F under the RCP 8.5 scenario by the end of the 21st century. (Ackerly, 2018, p. 14). See Figure 4-69 to compare current annual average maximum temperatures with those predicted for Solano County in 2100.
▪ Annual precipitation is likely to be delivered in more intense storms, with shorter wet seasons and prolonged dry seasons.
▪ An “average” rainfall year will become less common with a higher occurrence of extreme wet and dry years.
▪ Increased extreme weather events will increase the severity and extent of flooding. ▪ Stream flows in the summer dry season are predicted to decline, and peak flows in the wetter winter months are likely to increase.
▪ Sea-level rise is predicted to increase by at least two meters over the next several centuries. ▪ Wildfires will continue, with projections for a longer wildfire season, increased frequency, and expansion of the area susceptible to fire. (Grantham, 2018) ▪ Frost occurrences may become longer and more frequent. In February 2018, for example, grape growers prepared for extended frost threat, while coping with a lack of rainfall during what are typically the wettest months of the year. As climate change continues, bud break or the appearance of shoots that will eventually yield grapes will begin sooner, leaving the delicate new growth exposed to the hazards of frost and rain for a longer stretch of the growing season. (Lutz, 2018)
9 The San Francisco Bay Area Region for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment includes Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Alameda, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and San Francisco Counties.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 293 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 250 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-191
These impacts are predicted to significantly effect communities through habitat loss, including cold-water fish species such as salmon; increased flood and landslide risks to critical infrastructure; and increased public health risks from wildfire, floods, heatwaves, and disease vectors. (Id.) Note: Mapping in this HMP uses the moderate range RCP 4.5 as well as the high-end range RCP 8.5, as HMP mapping depicts projected sea-level rise and temperature increases in the later half of the century with an adaptive lens. (OPR Planning and Investing for a Resilient California, p. 19) Sea-Level Rise
Generally, some level of sea-level rise is projected for the shoreline of Solano County. The severity and extent of sea-level rise depends greatly on the future pathways for emission levels and how far into the future the analysis looks. Figure 4-63 and Figure 4-71 show predicted sea-level rise in Solano County based on low through extreme amounts of rise. See Section 4.5.7.4 for an overview of frequency and probability of occurrence, which plays directly into the severity and extent of sea-level rise.
Current and Projected Average Maximum Temperatures Under RCP 4.5 and 8.5 Scenarios Overall, temperatures in California are projected to rise by 5.6°F under an RCP 4.5 scenario and by 8.8°F under an RCP 8.5 scenario by the end of this century. (Bedsworth, 2018, p. 23) Figure 4-66 depicts the current average maximum temperature for Solano County. Figure 4-64 and Figure 4-65 illustrate the average maximum annual temperature for Solano County from 1950 through 2100 under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, respectively. Figure 4-67 and Figure 4-68 depict average maximum temperature projections through 2100 under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, respectively. The final figure, Figure 4-69, summarizes this information by juxtaposing the current average maximum temperature in the county with projected average annual maximum temperatures in 2100 under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios.
These projections differ depending on the time of year and the type of measurement (highs vs. lows), all of which have different potential effects to the county’s ecosystem health, agricultural production, water use and availability, and energy demand. Under the RCP 4.5 scenario, the county is projected to experience increases in maximum temperatures near 80°F. Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, portions of the county are projected to experience maximum temperatures closer to 90°F.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 294 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 251 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-192
Figure 4-63: Sea-Level Rise Potential
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 295 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 252 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-193
Figure 4-64: Annual Average Maximum Temperature (RCP 4.5 Scenario) Source: cal-adapt.org
Figure 4-65: Annual Average Maximum Temperature (RCP 8.5 Scenario) Source: cal-adapt.org
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 296 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 253 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-194
Figure 4-66: Current Average Max Temperature
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 297 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 254 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-195
Figure 4-67: Projected Average Max Temperature RCP 4.5 2100 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 298 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 255 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-196
Figure 4-68: Projected Average Max Temperature RCP 8.5 2100 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 299 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 256 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-197
Figure 4-69: Annual Average Maximum Temperature
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 300 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 257 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-198
4.5.7.6 Warning Time
As this section has described, many existing hazards could be intensified as a result of climate change, decreasing warning times and exacerbating impacts. Warning times are discussed under the various other hazards. Other climate change impacts are more long-term. Scientists have a high confidence in predicting the rise in global temperatures and have reached a consensus on the future impacts of climate change and the time frame in which they will occur.
Sea-Level Rise
Sea-level rise will occur slowly over time and increase impacts of other hazards profiled in the MJHMP, such as shoreline erosion and the potential impact of tsunamis.
4.5.7.7 Secondary Hazards
Secondary hazards of climate change include flood, extreme weather, drought, wildfire, sea-level rise, extreme heat, and heavy rain events. Climate change will increase the frequency at which extreme weather events occur. Secondary hazards of climate change that will have the greatest impact on Solano County include flood, drought, and extreme weather. Many of these impacts are discussed in other hazard profiles.
Sea-Level Rise
Sea-level rise is projected for the shoreline of Solano County as a secondary hazard associated with climate change. See Section 4.5.7.5 for sea-level rise projections for the Solano County shoreline.
4.5.7.8 Vulnerability Assessment
This section outlines vulnerabilities of Solano County to impacts from climate change and focuses on sea- level rise in particular, as many of the other impacts are secondary as outlined in other hazard profiles within this document. Sea-level rise also has delineated hazard boundaries and quantifiable exposure and damage estimations. This Vulnerability Assessment summarizes property, critical facilities, and population, including vulnerable populations in a more general context, within known hazard areas.
Appendix C: Supplemental Climate Vulnerability Assessment Appendix C includes a more detailed, supplemental assessment of climate vulnerability for all climate- related problem statements identified for hazards profiled in this MJHMP. The County assessed both the impact of climate change to the area of concern and the county’s capacity to adapt to the predicted future impact. Other jurisdictions completed this exercise and included results as appendices to jurisdictional annexes.
The impact and adaptive capacity ranking combine to give the climate change vulnerability score. The scoring is then used to prioritize mitigation actions based on vulnerability to climate change. This assessment is completed as a part of the overall MJHMP; jurisdictions may want to complete a more detailed Climate Vulnerability Assessment as part of in-depth climate adaptation planning, FINAL for adoption Packet Page 301 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 258 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-199
Population
Solano County’s projected climate change exposures have the potential to leave sensitive populations in the county, as the County has a significant number of elderly (29%), residents with diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (30%), and poor (8%). (American Community Survey, 2018) Higher frequency of extreme heat conditions can cause serious public health impacts, increasing the risk of conditions directly related to heat, such as heat stroke and dehydration. Older adults, particularly seniors, are more likely to experience respiratory or cardiovascular health complications than younger individuals.
Approximately 44,832 residents of the county are elderly. These populations are more likely to live alone with limited mobility. (Id.)
Solano County’s large agricultural workforce base is also susceptible to high heat. Heat stress can seriously affect those working outside by reducing overall productivity and, in extreme exposures, could lead to illness, disability, or death.
Renters are also more vulnerable, as they are less likely to reinforce buildings and buy insurance because the decision to make major home improvements typically lies with the property owner. Additionally, disaster recovery services target homeowners; renters may not receive as much outreach.
The Solano County Climate Change and Health Profile Report describes regional populations especially vulnerable to climate change. These populations include the very young and the very old, individuals with chronic medical conditions or psychiatric illness, as well as people taking multiple medications, people who are carless or lack access to public transit, people who are isolated socially, and people living in institutions.
It also emphasizes the fact that climate change can magnify existing health disparities. Disadvantaged communities, such as those with low social support, poverty, low education, racia lly segregated, or those experiencing income inequality, are more likely to face disproportionate climate-related health burdens. (Maizlish, 2017)
Sea-Level Rise
As sea levels rise, the area and the number of people at risk because of flooding will also rise. Factors that increase vulnerability to the adverse impacts of flood events associated with sea-level rise include access to preparedness information, transportation, healthcare, and insurance. Key demographics associated with these vulnerabilities include income, race, linguistic isolation (i.e., non-English speaking), educational attainment, and residential tenure. (R. Dean Hardy, Mathew E. Hauer, 2018, p. 13) Language ability is an important factor in assessing vulnerability as emergency response crews may be unable to communicate with non-English speakers. The estimated population exposed to sea-level rise is summarized in Figure 4-70 and Table 4-65.
Sea-level rise may significantly impact vulnerable communities. Approximately 38% of those vulnerable to a 100-year flood with a 55-inch sea-level rise in Solano County earn less than $30,000. (Solano County Sea Level Rise Strategic Program, 2011, p. 3.8)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 302 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 259 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-200
Table 4-65: Population Exposure to Sea-Level Rise (Unincorporated County) Total Population
Unincorporated County 19,665
Sea Level Rise (Feet) Population Count % of Total
Low Rise (0.3m) 2,027 10.31% Intermediate-Low Rise (0.5m) 2,531 12.87% Intermediate Rise (1.0m) 2,666 13.55% Intermediate-High Rise (1.5m) 2,798 14.23% High Rise (2.0m) 2,993 15.22% Extreme Rise (2.5m) 3,118 15.86%
Figure 4-70: Population Exposure to Sea-Level Rise (Unincorporated County) Property
Climate change could significantly impact the agricultural and wine industries, which are large drivers of the county’s economy. Specifically, the agricultural industry, which was recorded at $371,715,000 in 2020, could be especially impacted as climate variability interferes with crop production. (Solano County Agricultural Department, 2020) Increases in temperature and changes in precipitation and soil moisture could impact the growth of wine grapes by causing late or irregular blooming and affecting yields.
The increased likelihood of extreme floods could lead to the destruction of crops, erosion of topsoil, and deposits of debris and sediment on croplands. Conversely, as average temperatures increase with climate change, agricultural demand for water could intensify under extreme heat conditions, under which water evaporates faster and plants need more water moving through their circulatory systems to stay cool. More 2,027
2,531 2,666 2,798
2,993 3,118
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Low Rise (0.3m)Intermediate-Low
Rise (0.5m)
Intermediate Rise
(1.0m)
Intermediate-High
Rise (1.5m)
High Rise (2.0m)Extreme Rise
(2.5m)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 303 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 260 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-201
specifically, attempts to maintain wine grape productivity and quality in the face of warming may be associated with increased water use for irrigation, a change to different varietals of grapes, and to cool grapes through misting or sprinkling. As noted earlier, increased average temperatures and changes in timing and amounts of precipitation could affect local aquifer recharge for groundwater supplies in the future, which could in turn affect water supplies for agricultural uses.
Sea-Level Rise
The Solano County shoreline is vulnerable to sea -level rise. Approximately 10 percent of the general population would be at risk of exposure to low rise (0.3m) while almost 16 percent would be exposed to extreme rise (2.5m). See Table 4-65. Approximately two percent of the parcel count would also be exposed.
See Figure 4-71 for a property, parcel, and critical infrastructure exposure summary.
Table 4-66: Property Values Exposed to Sea-level Rise
Total Parcels
Total Market
Value ($)
Total Content
Value ($) Total Value ($)
Unincorporated County 6,668 $3,186,640,275 $2,078,097,240 $5,264,737,515
Sea Level Rise Parcel Count % of Total Market Value
Exposure ($)
Content Value
Exposure ($) Total Exposure ($) % of Total
Low Rise 44 0.7% $17,686,109 $10,553,359 $28,239,468 0.5% Intermediate-Low Rise 60 0.9% $23,473,487 $14,037,765 $37,511,252 0.7% Intermediate Rise 63 0.9% $23,982,853 $14,406,631 $38,389,484 0.7% Intermediate-High Rise 76 1.1% $28,356,083 $16,678,187 $45,034,270 0.9% High Rise 89 1.3% $33,329,557 $20,260,286 $53,589,843 1.0% Extreme Rise 115 1.7% $39,825,844 $23,575,022 $63,400,866 1.2%
Critical Facilities
Some critical infrastructure (e.g., roads, hospitals, schools, and emergency facilities) are at increased risk of flooding in the county. For example, the Hazardous Waste Facility adjacent to the City of Vallejo could become vulnerable to intermediate and low levels of sea -level rise. Adjacent areas associated with lower income housing is vulnerable to any compromised facilities due to sea level rise such as the Hazardous Waste Facility. Sections of Interstate 80 could also be completely obstructed, such as the Carquinez Bridge.
Sea-Level Rise
Critical facilities are summarized in the snapshot of sea-level rise in Figure 4-71. Table 4-67 and Table 4-68 summarize critical infrastructure exposed to sea-level rise in Solano County.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 304 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 261 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-202
Figure 4-71: Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability and Exposure Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 305 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 262 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-203
Table 4-67: Critical Infrastructure Points in Sea-Level Rise Regions (Unincorporated County) Critical Infrastructure - Sea Level Rise
Infrastructure Type Low Rise Intermediate-
Low Rise
Intermediate
Rise
Intermediate-
High Rise High Rise Extreme Rise
Essential Facility - - - - - -
EOC - - - - - -
Law Enforcement - - - - - -
Fire Station - - - - - -
Emergency Services - - - - - -
Hospital - - - - - -
High Potential Loss 3 3 4 8 24 28
Dam - - - - - -
Historic Building - - - - - -
Library - - - - - -
School - - - - - -
Historic Site - - - - - -
Community Center - - - - - -
Jurisdiction Real Property Asset* - - - - - -
Park 2 2 2 2 2 2
Wastewater Treatment Facility - - - - - -
Emergency Shelter - - - - - -
Administrative - - - - - -
Child Care Facility - - - - - -
Healthcare Facility - - - - - -
Senior Center - - - - - -
County Real Property Asset* 1 1 2 6 22 26
Early Learning - - - - - -
Transportation and Lifeline 20 29 30 30 36 38
Airport - - - - - -
Bridge - 3 4 4 6 7
Power Plant - - - - - -
Substation - - - - - -
Bus Facility - - - - - -
NG Station 3 3 3 3 3 4
Bus Stop - - - - - -
Railway Bridge - - - - - -
Cell Tower - - - - 3 3
Breakout Tank - - - - - -
Oil Facility - - - - - -
Transmission Line Tower 17 23 23 23 24 24
Wind Turbine - - - - - -
Ferry - - - - - -
Amtrak Station - - - - - -
Train Station - - - - - -
Hazmat 11 12 12 13 13 14
Hazmat 11 12 12 13 13 14
Hazardous Waste facility - - - - - -
Grand Total 34 44 46 51 73 80
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 306 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 263 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-204
Critical Infrastructure - Sea Level Rise
Infrastructure Type Low Rise Intermediate-
Low Rise
Intermediate
Rise
Intermediate-
High Rise High Rise Extreme Rise
*Note: Real Property Assets are digitized insurance rolls for demonstrating value and ownership and may have overlapping points with other categories such as fire stations and law enforcement. -Sea Level Rise Risk is cumulative
Table 4-68: Miles of Critical Infrastructure (Linear) in Sea-Level Rise Regions (Unincorporated County) Lifelines (miles) - Sea Level Rise
Infrastructure Type (Linear) Low Rise Intermediate-Low
Rise Intermediate Rise Intermediate-High
Rise
High
Rise
Extreme
Rise
Bus Route - - - - - -
Levee (FEMA) 302.8 353.6 380.2 398.3 400.9 401.3
Levee Flood Wall - - - - - -
Levee Cross Section - - - - - -
NG Pipeline 19.3 19.7 19.8 20.7 21.6 23.5
Railroad 2.4 5.4 8.1 12.6 14.9 15.1
Street 200.3 251.5 284.4 317.1 334.6 348.4
4WD trail - - - - - -
Alley - - - - - -
Cul-de-sac - - - 0.0 0.1 0.1
Driveway 13.8 17.8 19.7 21.5 22.6 23.2
Ferry - - - - - -
Interstate 2.7 3.0 3.6 8.4 14.3 16.2
Local road 158.1 199.0 224.7 240.6 245.5 248.8
Local road, major 25.5 31.5 36.1 43.2 47.4 52.3
Primary highway - - - - - -
Ramp 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Service road - - - - - -
State/county highway 0.1 0.2 0.3 3.3 4.7 7.6
Traffic circle - - - - - -
Walkway - - - - - -
Transmission Line 29.4 33.4 34.0 35.7 36.6 37.2
Grand Total 554.2 663.6 726.5 784.3 808.7 825.5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 307 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 264 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
4-205
4.5.7.9 Future Trends in Development
Solano County is committed to continuing efforts to address and reduce existing climate-related risks and future impacts on a holistic and programmatic level. With several ordinances and programs that cover a range of climate exposures and related impacts, the county is well equipped to handle current issues of extreme heat events and water supply, but could still likely face increasing challenges as projected changes occur.
The county has practices and organizations in place that help address future issues of sustainability and climate adaptation and works with several committees to reduce its emissions. For instance, it is working with the Agricultural Water Conservation Committee of the Solano Water Advisory Commission to produce fewer water-related GHG emissions. Solano County is finding ways to change behaviors and practices now.
The County also adopted the Green Building Standards Code, which exemplifies the actionable steps being taken in order to set a precedent for reduced energy use, building with more sustainable materials, and employing better water conservation tactics. Likewise, the County recently developed a Climate Action Plan. The intent of the plan is to protect the county from any current and projected hazardous conditions associated with climate change. The focus of the plan is on the wellbeing of the county; this also includes maintaining a healthy economy which is both diverse and strong. The plan describes the potential climate change effects in Solano County and includes a GHG inventory and GHG reduction targets, as well as GHG emission reduction measures and actions. (Solano County Cimate Action Plan, 2011) The County also joined Marin Clean Energy (MCE), which allows users to purchase more renewable energy options as part of a progressive assembly bill called Community Choice Aggregation. Beginning in February of 2019, all homes and businesses in unincorporated Solano, as well as the Cities of Benicia and Vallejo, began receiving the power agency’s default service, which runs on approximately 60 percent renewable energy. (Marin Clean Energy, 2020) These efforts, however, need to be expanded and applied on a much larger scale, along with mitigation actions identified in this HMP, to address future changes attributed to climate change.
4.5.7.10 Climate Change Hazard Problem Statements
As part of the mitigation action identification process, the Planning Committee for the county and for each jurisdiction identified issues and weaknesses, also called problem statements, for their respective facilities.
Identification was based on the risk assessment and vulnerability analysis utilizing the RAMP mapping tool and climate change data. Climate change hazard problem statements for all participating jurisdictions are listed in Table 4-69; problem statements for all other participating jurisdictions are accessed in Volume 2 of this plan.
Identifying these common issues and weaknesses assists the Planning Committee in understanding the realm of resources needed for mitigation. The goal is to have at least one mitigation action for every problem statement. See Table 5-6 for a full list of mitigation actions and corresponding problem statements that they FINAL for adoption Packet Page 308 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 265 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
4-206
address. Each problem statement is coded with a problem number for cross-referencing between Table 4-69 and Table 5-6.
Table 4-69: Climate Change Problem Statements
Problem
No.
Hazard
Type
Area of
Concern
Mitigation
Alternatives
Primary
Agency Problem Description Related MA
ps-CC-SC-
174
Climate
Change
Impact PRV -
Prevention ,
PPRO - Property
Protection , SP -
Structural
Projects
Solano
County
Climate Change/ Sea Level Rise
predicted to increase flooding, inundate
some critical infrastructure including
bridges, hazmat storage areas, and a
police station.
ma-FL-SC-19,
ma-FL-SC-21,
ma-FL-SC-24
ps-CC-SC-
175
Climate
Change
Impact NRP - Natural
Resource
Protection , SP -
Structural
Projects
Solano
County
Droughts are likely to become more
frequent and persistent.
ma-DR-SC-162,
ma-DR-SC-163
ps-CC-SC-
176
Climate
Change
Impact PRV -
Prevention ,
PPRO - Property
Protection , NRP
- Natural
Resource
Protection
Solano
County
Intense rainfall events, periodically
ones with larger than historical runoff,
will continue to affect Solano County
ma-FL-SC-25,
ma-FL-SC-26,
ma-FL-SC-173,
ma-FL-SC-174
ps-CC-SC-
177
Climate
Change
Impact PRV -
Prevention ,
PPRO - Property
Protection
Solano
County
Wildfires will continue, with projections
for a longer wildfire season, increased
frequency, and expansion of the area
susceptible to fire
ma-WF-SC-34,
ma-WF-SC-37,
ma-WF-SC-40
ps-CC-SC-
178
Climate
Change
Victim PRV -
Prevention ,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness
Solano
County
Climate change is expected to lead to
increases in the frequency, intensity,
and duration of extreme heat events
and heat waves in Solano County which
are likely to increase the risk of
mortality and morbidity due to heat-
related illness and exacerbation of
existing chronic health conditions
ma-EW-SC-
170, ma-EW-
SC-171
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 309 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 266 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-1
Section 5. Mitigation Strategy
The mitigation strategy is the guidebook to future hazard mitigation administration for the county and all other participating jurisdictions, capturing the key outcomes of the MJHMP planning process. The mitigation strategy is intended to reduce vulnerabilities outlined in the previous section with a prescription of policies and physical projects. These mitigation actions should be compatible with existing planning mechanisms and should outline specific roles and resources for implementation success. The Planning Committee conducted the hazard mitigation planning process through typical problem -solving, as did the Steering Committees for each participating jurisdiction. Those steps included:
▪ Estimate the impacts (see Vulnerability Assessments); ▪ Describe the problem (see Problem Statements);
▪ Assess what resources exist to lessen impacts and problem (see Capability Assessments); ▪ Develop Goals and Objectives to address the problems (see Goals and Objectives); and ▪ Determine what can be done and develop actions that are appropriate for the community (see Mitigation Action Matrix).
5.1 Mitigation Alternatives
During Planning Committee Meeting #3 on February 17, 2021, the MJHMP Planning Committee developed and reviewed mitigation actions with a wide range of alternatives using FEMA’s six broad categories of mitigation alternatives described below. The MJHMP Planning Committee considered many mitigation alternatives for implementation under each mitigation category, both county-wide and for individual participating jurisdictions. The Planning Committee chose the most efficient and cost effective alternatives based on assessed vulnerability and risk, the capabilities assessment, and group consensus to address identified hazard problems.
Solano County and participating jurisdictions also met several times before and after the large group meeting to review specific hazard-related problem statements and develop mitigation actions. (Cal-Adapt, 2021) These meetings relied on the following framework to explore mitigation actions.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 310 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 267 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-2
PREVENTION (PRV)
Preventative activities keep hazard problems from getting worse and typically are administered through government programs or regulations addressing building and land development. Preventative actions are particularly effective in reducing a community’s future vulnerability in areas where development has not occurred, or capital improvements have not yet been substantial. Examples of preventative activities include:
▪ Planning and
zoning
ordinances
▪ Open space
preservation
▪ Stormwater
management
regulations
▪ Capital
improvements
programming
▪ Building codes ▪ Floodplain
regulations
▪ Drainage system
maintenance
▪ Riverine or fault
zone setbacks
LOCAL PRV ALTERNATIVES
1. Establish ingress/ egress standards for future development.
2. Enhance the county’s GIS database and capabilities related to hazards information.
3. Maintain detention basins.
4. Conduct detailed studies and mapping of floodplains for the Sacramento River and its tributaries, targeting problematic floodplains.
5. Update and distribute wildfire risk mapping for Solano County.
6. Restrict new development in dam inundation zones.
7. Amend or revise water conservation regulations for landscape design for commercial and residential development with the goal of limiting outdoor watering.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 311 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 268 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-3
PROPERTY PROTECTION (PPRO)
Property protection measures involve the modification of existing buildings and structures to help them better withstand the forces of a hazard, or removal of the structures from hazardous locations. Examples include:
▪ Building elevation ▪ Retrofitting (e.g., seismic
design techniques, etc.)
▪ Insurance
▪ Critical facilities
protection
▪ Safe rooms, shutters,
shatter resistant glass
LOCAL PPRO ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue to work with the Solano County Fire Departments to conduct mitigation projects with homeowners. Provide homeowners easily accessible resources for mitigating the risk of wildfire around their homes.
2. Implement additional fuel reduction projects.
3. Remove existing structures from flood areas whenever, and to the greatest extent, possible.
Relocate farm work centers from flood risk areas.
4. Encourage privately owned critical facilities (e.g., churches, hotels, other gathering facilities) to evaluate the ability of the buildings to withstand earthquakes and to address any deficiencies identified.
5. Identify and harden critical lifeline systems (i.e., critical public services such as utilities and roads) to meet “Seismic Design Guidelines and Standards for Lifelines” or equivalent standards, such as American Lifelines Alliance (ALA) guidance.
6. Consider participation in the Community Rating System or other ways to increase participation in the NFIP.
7. Review construction plans for all bridges to determine their susceptibility to collapse and retrofit problem bridges.
8. Use flexible piping when extending water, sewer, or natural gas service.
9. Strengthen and retrofit non-reinforced masonry buildings and non-ductile concrete facilities that are particularly vulnerable to ground shaking.
10. Install shutoff valves and emergency connector hoses where water mains cross fault lines.
11. Continue to incentivize drought-tolerant landscape design.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 312 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 269 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-4
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND AWARENESS (PE&A)
Public education and awareness activities advise students, staff, parents, nearby residents, and elected officials about hazards, hazardous areas, and mitigation techniques they can use to protect themselves and their property. Measures to educate and inform the public include:
▪ Outreach
projects,
including
neighborhood
and community
outreach
▪ Speaker series/
demonstration
events
▪ Real estate
disclosures
▪ School children
educational
programs
▪ Hazard mapping ▪ Materials
library
▪ Hazard
expositions
LOCAL PE&A ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue to work with the Solano County Fire Departments to educate homeowners on reducing the risk of wildfire on their property, including understanding their wildfire risk and free site visits.
2. Distribute public education materials relating to natural hazards, as well as emergency notifications in both English and Spanish.
3. Partner with local water agencies such as the Solano County Water Agency, the Solano Irrigation District, the Suisun City Water Department, etc., in their public education and conservation campaigns in both English and Spanish.
4. Encourage businesses to build financial reserves as part of economic development.
5. Improve information on floodplain management, earthquake preparedness, wildfire mitigation and preparedness, and other hazards on participating jurisdictions’ websites.
6. Distribute National Flood Insurance Program and floodplain development information in county libraries for access by the public.
7. Focus a public education program around neighborhoods with egress/ingress issues and narrow roads.
8. Improve interactive hazard mapping resources available to the public.
9. Develop a public information campaign on 72-hour kits.
10. Develop a "Natural Hazard Awareness Week" campaign and conduct corresponding outreach to the community and all interested parties.
11. Conduct outreach to builders, architects, engineers, and inspectors about building susceptibility to earthquakes and proper design and building requirements.
12. Educate the public on the importance of drought-tolerant landscaping, low flow indoor fixtures, and other water savings techniques to better withstand periods of drought.
13. Partner with local programs such as the Solano County Water Agency School Water Education Program.
14. Offer agricultural disaster training and networking opportunities for farmers and agricultural regulatory agencies.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 313 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 270 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-5
NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION (NRP)
Natural resource protection activities reduce the impact of natural hazards by preserving or restoring natural areas and their protective functions. Such areas include floodplains, wetlands, steep slopes, and sand dunes. Parks, recreation, or conservation agencies and organizations often implement these protective measures. Examples include:
▪ Floodplain protection ▪ Vegetation management
(e.g., fire resistant
landscaping, fuel breaks,
etc.)
▪ Wetland and habitat
preservation and
restoration
▪ Watershed management ▪ Erosion and sediment
control
LOCAL NRP ALTERNATIVES
1. Protect and restore wetlands, riparian areas, and natural buffers to sea level rise. In particular, continue to implement restoration of Solano County rivers.
2. Continue to implement the Solano County Water Agency Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
3. Complete vegetation management projects as prescribed in local Community Wildfire Protection Plans.
4. Encourage and incentivize drought-tolerant landscape design.
5. Establish a priority list of slope failure locations and implement slope stabilization projects in the highest risk areas.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 314 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 271 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-6
EMERGENCY SERVICES (ES)
Although not typically considered a mitigation technique, emergency service measures do minimize the impact of a hazard event on people and property. These commonly are actions taken immediately prior to, during, or in response to a hazard event. Examples include:
▪ Warning systems ▪ Sandbag staging for flood protection ▪ Construction of evacuation routes ▪ Installing temporary shutters on buildings for wind protection
LOCAL ES ALTERNATIVES
1. Install back up power generators for fire stations, pump houses, emergency shelters, and cooling centers.
2. Develop a website for vulnerable populations to register information such as where the individual in question lives, medications, restrictions, etc. Map registrants or tie information to the Nixle alert system.
3. Focus capital improvements on evacuation or emergency access routes needing attention.
4. Increase the capacity of existing hospitals through retrofits or upgrades, such as isolation wings.
5. Construct or improve egress for wildfire emergencies in wildland-urban interface (WUI) areas.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 315 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 272 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-7
STRUCTURAL PROJECTS (SP)
Structural mitigation projects are intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the environment and natural progression of the hazard event through construction. They are usually designed by engineers and managed or maintained by public works staff. Examples include:
▪ Stormwater diversions/ detention and
retention infrastructure
▪ Utility Upgrades
▪ Seismic Retrofits
LOCAL SP ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue to work with the Solano Resource Conservation District to maintain projects such as Centennial Park and the Solano County Delta Restoration Work.
2. Continue to work with the Napa Solano Audubon Society on projects such as clean water, habitat restoration, and watershed enhancement.
3. Improve water supply and delivery systems to be more resilient during times of drought.
4. Construct and develop alternative water supplies to augment single sources of water delivery.
5. Construct rainwater catchment systems to recharge groundwater in government rights-of-way.
6. Install water monitoring devices and drought-tolerant landscaping on government-owned facilities.
7. Improve stormwater drainage capacity; construct or improve stormwater basins county-wide to accomplish 100-year protection.
8. Construct, install, and maintain warning gauges on local dams as the opportunity or need arises.
9. Create an inventory and establish a priority list for culvert replacement that takes into account fish passage, flood depth reduction, and future losses avoided.
10. Retrofit critical care facilities with enhanced HVAC and isolation areas.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 316 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 273 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-8
5.2 Identifying the Problem
As part of the mitigation action identification process, the MJHMP Planning Committee identified the areas of concern and potential impacts of each of the identified hazards on the community. Developing these “problem statements” for areas of concern, which describe the nature of the consequences or effects of a hazard occurrence on the community and its assets, ensures the identified mitigation actions are tailored to the specific problems created by various hazard scenarios and are specific to each participating jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction’s problem statements are available as part of the Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST), available for participating jurisdictions on mitigatehazards.com, and summarized for individual participating jurisdictions in Volume 2 of this plan.
See Section 5.6 for county-wide mitigation actions and Volume 2 for mitigation actions for each participating jurisdiction.
5.3 Identifying Benefits
Mitigation actions have a wide range of community benefits for increasing hazard resilience. The benefits are framed by the goals of the plan in Section 5.5. Benefits generated from the mitigation action projects can generally be categorized as governmental benefits and public benefits.
Governmental benefits have an indirect public benefit, as they are aimed at protecting community lifelines such as:
▪ critical infrastructure such as drinking water, wastewater, heating and cooling infrastructure; ▪ vulnerable population centers such as schools, childcare facilities, hospitals, residential care facilities, or other emergency or community services; or ▪ lifelines such as streets, transmission lines, pipelines for natural gas or water infrastructure, or levees.
Other benefits are aimed directly at the public through community benefits such as lower insurance costs through completion of large-scale mitigation activities; or cost-sharing for projects on private property; homeowner, business owner, and renters.
Benefits are largely shaped by identifying the problem (Section 5.2), defining the goals of the hazard mitigation plan (Section 5.5), and then by structuring the best mitigation action plan (Section 5.6) to address the problems and underlying goals, as illustrated in Figure 5-1.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 317 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 274 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-9
Figure 5-1: Process to Mitigation Project Benefits
5.4 Capabilities and Adaptive Capacity Assessment
This section examines Solano County’s planning and regulatory, administrative, technical, financial, educational, and outreach capabilities to augment known issues and weaknesses from identified natural hazards. Volume 2 of this HMP includes a capabilities assessment for each participating jurisdiction as part of their annexes.
Capabilities assessments in this Volume 1 and in Volume 2 include considerations of a community’s adaptive capacity for climate change, as outlined in Cal OES’ 2020 California Adaptation Planning Guide.
Adaptive capacity is a community or region’s existing ability to moderate climate change impacts.
Assessing adaptive capacity includes analysis of policies, plans, programs, funding, and staffing capacity. (Cal. Adaptation Planning Guide, 2020, p. 94)
The tables in this section explore various local planning mechanisms, administrative capacity, financial capabilities, and education and outreach initiatives. For more information on the regulatory environment surrounding each hazard, see hazard-specific sections of Section 4.5.The columns in each table represent address the following questions:
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 318 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 275 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-10
▪ Is the existing planning or regulatory mechanism used currently? (Column 1, Status) ▪ Has the HMP been integrated into the planning mechanism currently so that the named mechanism is currently used in HMP planning? (Column 2, Current Mitigation Use) ▪ Is there a future opportunity to expand, improve upon, and incorporate this 2020 HMP Update into the planning or regulatory mechanism? (Column 3, Future Opportunity) The capabilities assessment is easily-digestible and based on color coding to indicate which policies and plans are adequate, need improvement, or for which the HMP could be integrated. Each table includes a legend that explains how each one of these questions are being answered according to the color indicated:
green, yellow, or orange.
Planning and Regulatory Mitigation Capabilities
The information in Table 5-1 is used to align mitigation actions with the existing planning and regulatory capabilities of the county. Planning and regulatory tools typically used by local jurisdictions to implement hazard mitigation activities are building codes, zoning regulations, floodplain management policies, and other municipal planning documents.
Table 5-1: Solano County Planning and Regulatory Mitigation Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
Construction and Future Development Regulations
Building Codes Green Green Yellow 2019 California Building Code Building Code Effectiveness Grading
Schedule (BCEGS) Rating N/A N/A N/A
Public Protection (ISO Class) N/A N/A N/A
Hazard Related Development Standards
Green Yellow Green
California Building Code Section 1505
Amended -Roofing (6.3-19); Permits (12.2-41);
Duties and responsibilities of the floodplain
administror (12.2-43); Floodways (12.2-54);
Separate Map Sheets or Documents (26-103.13)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 319 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 276 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-11
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
Hazard-Specific Ordinance
Green Yellow Green
Flood Damage Prevention (Chpt. 12.2);
California Fire Code -Section 110.4 added -
hazard abatement (6.3-24); Fire Protection
District- Clearance or Order to Clear Land of
Flammable Material (12.5-20)
Zoning Ordinance Green Yellow Green
Growth Management Ordinance Orange Orange N/A
Hazard Reduction Programs (Annually Conducted)
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) or
Plan Green Yellow Green
Erosion/Sediment Control Program Yellow Yellow Green Reassessments recommended after 2020 LNU Lightning Fires
Hazard-Related Public Outreach Program Green Yellow Yellow See Education & Outreach Capabilities for more specifics.
Stormwater Management Program
(Annual Inspections) Yellow Yellow Green
Seismic Safety Program (Non-structural
Inspections) Green Green Yellow
Earthquake Modernization Program
(Building Safety Inspections) Green Green Yellow
Hazard Plans
General Plan Safety Element Green Green Green 2008 General Plan Noteworthy Area/ Specific Plan with
Hazard Focus Yellow Yellow Green
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP) Orange Orange Green
Wildfire Vulnerability Assessment Orange Orange Green
Urban or Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan Green Yellow Green 2015 Solano County Water Agency Urban Water Management Plan
Floodplain Management Plan Green Green Orange This document is the County's Floodplain Mgmt Plan
Stormwater Management Plan Green Green Yellow 2017 SWCA Water Management Plan Ground Water Management Plan(s) Yellow Orange Orange Solano Groundwater Sustainability Plan (forthcoming, 2021)
Open Space and Land Management
Plan(s) Orange Orange Green
Emergency Operations Plan Green Yellow Green 2017 Solano County Emergency Operations Plan
Climate Action Plan, Vulnerability Ass'mt,
or Adaptation Plan Yellow Yellow Green 2011 County of Solano Climate Action Plan & Sea Level Rise Strategic Plan
Sustainable Community Plan (SB 375) Yellow Yellow Green ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 (2017) Local Delta/ Wetlands Program(s) Green Yellow Yellow Suisun Marsh Local Protection Program; White Slough Specific Plan
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 320 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 277 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-12
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
Downtown Plan with hazard focus N/A N/A N/A
Community Health Assessment(s) Green Yellow Green 2016 Solano County Community Health Assessment
National Flood Protection Program (NFIP)
Floodplain Management Regulations Green Green Yellow Chpt. 12.2 Flood Damage Prevention Flood Insurance Education and Technical
Assist. Green Yellow Yellow
Flood Hazard Mapping / Re-Mapping Green Yellow Yellow 2013 Flood Insurance Study Community Rating System (CRS) Green Green Yellow Class 7
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 321 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 278 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-13
Administrative and Technical Capabilities
Table 5-2 shows the administrative and technical capabilities of Solano County.
Table 5-2: Solano County Administrative and Technical Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity Notes / Additional Detail
Administrative and Technical
Community Planning and
Development Services
Community Planner Yellow Yellow Green
Civil Engineer Green Green Green Jason Riley, Civil Engineer Building Code Official Green Yellow Yellow Saeed Iravani, Building Official Floodplain Administrator Green Green Green John Millea, Floodplain Manager Fire Marshall N/A N/A N/A
Dedicated Public Outreach Personnel Green Yellow Yellow GIS Specialist and Capability Green Yellow Green Stuart Bruce, Senior GIS Analyst Emergency Manager Green Green Green Don Ryan
Grant Manager, Writer, or Specialist Yellow Yellow Yellow Various departmental responsibilities Other 0 0 0
Warning Systems/Services
General Green Green Yellow Alert Solano; County would like to pursue sirens as well
Flood
Green Green Yellow
Emergency Alert:
Flood Risk: California Department of Water
Resources Flood Risk Notification Program
Flood Control: Solano County Water Agency
Wildfire Green Green Yellow
Geological Hazards Green Green Yellow ShakeAlert.org (nation-wide)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 322 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 279 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-14
Financial Capabilities
Table 5-3 identifies the financial tools or resources that Solano County has used to fund mitigation activities.
Table 5-3: Solano County Fiscal Capabilities Summary
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity Notes / Additional Detail
Fiscal Capabilities
Financial Resources for Hazard
Mitigation
Levy for Specific Purposes with Voter
Approval Green Yellow Green Fire Districts as example
Utilities Fees N/A N/A N/A
Benefit assessments N/A N/A N/A
System Development Fee N/A N/A N/A
Various Bonds to Incur Debt Green Yellow Yellow
Withheld Spending in Hazard-Prone
Areas Green Yellow Yellow
Stormwater Service Fees Yellow Yellow Yellow
Capital Improvement Project Funding Green Yellow Green
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 323 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 280 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-15
Education and Outreach
Table 5-4 lists the local citizen groups that communicate hazard risks.
Table 5-4: Solano County Education/ Outreach Capabilities Summary
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Education / Outreach Capabilities
Education/Outreach Resources
Website Dedicated to Hazard Topics Green Yellow Green Get Ready Solano Dedicated Social Media Green Green Yellow
Hazard Info. Avail. at Library/ Planning
Desk Yellow Yellow Green
Annual Public Safety Events Yellow Yellow Yellow Not in 2020 or likely for 2021 Ability to Field Public Tech. Assistance
Requests Green Green Orange
Public Safety Newsletters or Printed
Outreach Yellow Green Yellow
Fire Safe Councils Yellow Yellow Green Green Valley Fire Safe Council Resource Conservation Districts Green Yellow N/A Solano Resource Conservation District Other 0 0 0
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 324 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 281 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-16
Capability and Adaptive Capacity Opportunities
The above assessment offers ample opportunity for Solano County to consider strengthening its capabilities and adaptive capacity. The reflections in this section are meant as an example, not an exhaustive list of next steps to increase capacity. Prioritized opportunities to increase capacity in the county are shown as mitigation actions in Section 5.6.2.
The Capability Assessment identifies an opportunity to explore revisions to the County Code to incorporate lessons learned from recent wildfires and floods; there is an opportunity for the County to consider weed abatement, siting, access routes, defensible space and fuel breaks, and a variety of other topics. Some guidance documents are also aging, including the specific plan for White Slough.
Related to adaptive capacity, Solano County’s climate action plan and sea-level rise strategic plan are now a decade old. There is an opportunity to update these plans and look more in-depth at prioritized climate vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies.
The following federal and state funding opportunities are provided as opportunities to leverage to increase county and jurisdictional capacity.
Federal and State Funding Opportunities
Table 5-5 is a list of available funding sources from state and federal agencies. This includes the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant program, which is described in more detail in Section 6.3.5. This list serves as a resource and is not exclusive.
Table 5-5: Federal and State Funding Opportunities
Agency /
Grant Name Potential Programs/Grants
FEMA Hazard Mitigation
Assistance Grants
See Section 6 for FEMA/ HMA grant details. For more information on current grants visit https://www.fema.gov/hazard-mitigation-assistance
▪ Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP):
https://www.fema.gov/hazard-mitigation-grant-program
▪ Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC):
https://www.fema.gov/grants/mitigation/building-resilient-infrastructure- communities
▪ Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program (FMA):
https://www.fema.gov/flood-mitigation-assistance-grant-program Other FEMA Grant Programs Including:
▪ Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. Assistance to Firefighters Grants, Fire Prevention & Safety, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response. https://www.fema.gov/welcome-assistance- firefighters-grant-program
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 325 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 282 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-17
Agency /
Grant Name Potential Programs/Grants
▪ Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG). Good for Equipment, Back Up Generators, Etc. https://www.fema.gov/emergency- management-performance-grant-program
▪ Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP).
Housing and Logistics and Supply Chain Management, encouraging innovative regional solutions to issues related to catastrophic incidents, and building on existing regional efforts.
https://www.fema.gov/regional-catastrophic-preparedness-grant-program U.S. Dept. of Energy / Energy
Efficiency and Conservation
Block Grant Program
Provides funding for weatherization of structures and development of building codes and ordinances to ensure energy efficiency and restoration of older homes. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wipo/energy-efficiency-and-conservation-block-grant- program
State and County
Community Development
Dept. Block Grants (CDBG)
Through California Dept. of Housing and Community Development (HCD) programs include:
▪ Community Development (CD)
▪ Economic Development (ED)
▪ Disaster Recovery Initiative (DRI)
▪ Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)
▪ https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/active-funding/cdbg.shtml Cal OES
Proposition 1B Grants
Programs
The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1B at the November 7, 2006 general election, authorizes the issuance of $19,925,000,000 in general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including grants for transit system safety, security, and disaster response projects.
http://www.caloes.ca.gov/cal-oes-divisions/grants-management/homeland-security- prop-1b-grant-programs/proposition-1b-grant
California Proposition 1: the
Water Bond (AB 1471)
Authorize $7.545 billion in general obligation bonds for state water supply infrastructure projects, such as public water system improvements, surface and groundwater storage, drinking water protection, water recycling and advanced water treatment technology, water supply management and conveyance, wastewater treatment, drought relief, emergency water supplies, and ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration.
The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) will administer Proposition 1 funds for five programs. The estimated implementation schedule for each is outlined in five categories:
▪ Small Community Wastewater
▪ Water Recycling
▪ Drinking Water
▪ Stormwater
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 326 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 283 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-18
Agency /
Grant Name Potential Programs/Grants
▪ Groundwater Sustainability
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/grants_loans/proposition1.sht ml
Assistance to Firefighters
Grant Program (AFG); Fire
Prevention and Safety
(FP&S)
The primary goal of the FP&S Grants is to enhance the safety of the public and firefighters with respect to fire and fire-related hazards. The Grant Programs Directorate administers the FP&S Grants as part of the AFG Program. FP&S Grants are offered to support projects in two activity areas:
1) Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Activity: Activities designed to reach high-risk target groups and mitigate the incidence of death and injuries caused by fire and fire-related hazards.
2) Research and Development (R&D) Activity: To learn more about how to prepare to apply for a project under this activity, please see the FP&S Research and Development Grant Application Get Ready Guide.
https://www.fema.gov/fire-prevention-safety-grants
California Housing and
Community Development
(HCD) Emergency Solutions
Grant (ESG) Program
To fund projects that serve homeless individuals and families with supportive services, emergency shelter/transitional housing, assisting persons at risk of becoming homeless with homelessness prevention assistance, and providing permanent housing to the homeless population. The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009 places new emphasis on assisting people to quickly regain stability in permanent housing after experiencing a housing crisis or homelessness.
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/fa/esg/index.html
CalTrans Division of Local
Assistance / Safe Routes to
School Program
California Dept. of Transportation. Federal funding administered via Caltrans. Local 10% match is the minimum requirement.
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/saferoutes/saferoutes.htm Active transportation grant program. Creating mobility and connectivity. Prioritize projects, and preparation of PED for active transportation projects.
Property Assessed Clean
Energy (PACE) Programs
PACE financing allows property owners to fund energy efficiency, water efficiency, and renewable energy projects with little or no up-front costs. With PACE, residential and commercial property owners living within a participating district can finance up to 100% of their project and pay it back over time as a voluntary property tax assessment through their existing property tax bill.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 327 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 284 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-19
Agency /
Grant Name Potential Programs/Grants
HazMat Emergency
Preparedness Grant
The purpose of this grant program is to increase effectiveness in safely and efficiently handling hazardous materials accidents and incidents; enhance implementation of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA); and encourage a comprehensive approach to emergency training and planning by incorporating the unique challenges of responses to transportation situations. http://www.caloes.ca.gov/cal-oes-divisions/fire-rescue/hazardous-materials/hazmat- emergency-preparedness-grant
CERT Program Manager
Course
The purpose of this Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program Manager course is to prepare CERT Program Managers for the tasks required to establish and sustain an active local CERT program.
http://www.californiavolunteers.org/index.php/CERT/PM/
California Residential
Mitigation Program
The California Residential Mitigation Program (CRMP) was established to carry out mitigation programs to assist California homeowners who wish to seismically retrofit their houses.
http://www.californiaresidentialmitigationprogram.com/
Earthquake Brace + Bolt
(EBB)
EBB, part of the California Residential Mitigation Program, was developed to help homeowners lessen the potential for damage to their houses during an earthquake by offering eligible homeowners up to a $3,000 incentive to seismically retrofit their homes. https://www.earthquakebracebolt.com/
California Air Resources
Board Air Pollution
Incentives, Grants and Credit
Programs
These programs have hundreds of millions of dollars in grants available over the next several years to reduce emissions from on- and off-road vehicles and equipment. https://www.arb.ca.gov/ba/fininfo.htm
California Department of
Water Resources Grants and
Loans
Agency offers a variety of grants and loans related to integrated regional water management, flood mitigation, water conservation and efficiency, environmental restoration, groundwater, water quality, and water supply. https://water.ca.gov/Work-With-Us/Grants-And-Loans
US Bureau of Reclamation
WaterSMART Grants
Annual funding available for:
▪ Water Reclamation and Reuse
▪ Drought Resiliency Project
▪ Water and Energy Efficiency Grant
https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 328 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 285 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-20
5.5 Mitigation Goals
Hazard mitigation plans must identify goals for reducing long-term vulnerabilities to identified hazards (44 C.F.R. § 201.6(c)(3)(i)). The HMPC established a set of goals for this plan, based on review of Solano County’s previous goals, goals from other jurisdictions’ hazard mitigation plans, and from the California Hazard Mitigation Plan. The HMPC also considered the preliminary risk assessment and public outreach results.
The HMPC ultimately determined to adopt similar goals to the California Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Goals discussed in this section describe what future actions should occur to continue mitigating hazards.
The goals form the basis for the development of the Mitigation Action Strategy and specific mitigation projects. The process consists of 1) setting goals, 2) considering mitigation alternatives, 3) identifying strategies or “actions”, and 4) developing a prioritized action plan resulting in a mitigation strategy.
The goals and mitigation actions in this plan all support each other. Actions were prioritized based on their ability to achieve multiple goals. A mitigation strategy is considered effective based on how well the goals of the strategy are achieved. The abbreviations reflected in parenthesis below are used to match mitigation actions with each goal in Table 5-6.
The following are the goals for this plan:
Goal 1: Significantly reduce risk of injuries and loss of life during disaster events. (“People”)
Goal 2: Minimize damage to critical infrastructure and property and minimize interruption of essential services and activities. (“Infrastructure”) Goal 3: Protect the environment. (“Environment”)
Goal 4: Promote community resilience through integration of hazard mitigation with public policy and standard business practices. (“Resilience”)
5.6 County-Wide Mitigation Actions
Mitigation actions were developed based upon planning committee priorities, risk assessment results, and mitigation alternatives. Most importantly, the newly-developed mitigation actions acknowledge updated risk assessment information outlined in Section 4.
Mitigation actions are available to jurisdictions on MAST, linked through mitigatehazards.com; the format allows for regular updating and easy sorting by jurisdiction and hazard. Figure 5-2 illustrates the mitigation actions entered through MAST.
Table 5-6 establishes mitigation actions for the county. Each participating jurisdiction developed mitigation actions specifically tailored to their vulnerabilities and capabilities. Those mitigation actions are available FINAL for adoption Packet Page 329 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 286 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-21
as part of the planning process library, which is summarized in Section 3, STEP 3: Develop a Mitigation Strategy, are available on the Mitigation Action Application, and available for each individual participating jurisdiction in Volume 2 of this plan.
Some mitigation actions support ongoing activities of participating jurisdictions, while other actions are intended to be completed when funding is available. All mitigation actions will be reviewed annually.
Figure 5-2: Mitigation Action Application
Prioritization of Mitigation Actions
Implementing the identified mitigation can be overwhelming for any local jurisdiction or district, especially with limited staffing and fiscal resources; prioritizing the identified mitigation actions can help greatly with this. To ensure this MJHMP realistically reflects available resources, mitigation actions are prioritized by considering the cost/benefit review, public input, and MJHMP Planning Committee agreement.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 330 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 287 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-22
5.6.1.1 Cost/Benefit Review
The action plan must be prioritized according to a cost/benefit analysis of the proposed projects and their associated costs (44 C.F.R. §201.6(c)(3)(iii)). The benefits of proposed projects were weighed against estimated costs as part of the project prioritization process. This review does not meet FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant program requirements. A less formal, less costly approach was used because some projects may not be implemented for up to 10 years, and associated costs and benefits could change dramatically in that time.
Parameters were established for assigning subjective ratings (high, medium, and low) to the costs and benefits of these projects. Cost ratings were defined as follows:
▪ High—Existing funding will not cover the cost of the project; implementation would require new revenue through an alternative source (for example, bonds, grants, and fee increases). ▪ Medium—The project could be implemented with existing funding but would require a re- apportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years.
▪ Low —The project could be funded under the existing budget. The project is part of or can be part of an ongoing existing program.
Benefit ratings were defined as follows:
▪ High—Project will provide an immediate reduction of risk exposure for life and property. ▪ Medium—Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure for life and property, or will not provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure for property. ▪ Low —Long-term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term.
Using this approach, projects with positive benefit versus cost ratios (such as high over high, high over medium, medium over low, etc.) are considered cost-beneficial and are prioritized accordingly. For many of the strategies identified in this action plan, the partners may seek financial assistance under the HMGP or BRIC programs, both of which require detailed cost/benefit analyses. These analyses will be performed on projects at the time of application using the FEMA cost/benefit model. For projects not seeking financial assistance from grant programs that require detailed analysis, the partners reserve the right to define “benefits” according to parameters that meet the goals and objectives of this HMP.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 331 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 288 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-23
5.6.1.2 Public Input
An eight-question community survey was distributed by Solano County via a number of online platforms, including Facebook posts by participating jurisdictions and a notification across the SolanoAlert system. A total of 1,842 survey responses were collected in English and an additional eight responses were collected in Spanish. The results of the survey were used to ensure that the priorities of the county and participating jurisdictions match those of the residents and community members.
Specific question responses heavily influenced the prioritization of mitigation actions, including the following summarized questions and responses:
▪ Property at risk? 73.1% of participants believe their property is at risk from a natural hazard disaster.
▪ Hazards experienced? Respondents have experienced the following hazards:
o Pandemic
(55.4%)
o Wildfire (44.1%)
o Earthquake
(51%)
o Drought (38.4%)
o Only 7.8% of respondents had not experienced a natural hazard. ▪ Consider risk of hazards with home purchase? 57.6% of participants considered the risk of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.
▪ Informed about hazard risks? 47.6% of respondents felt they were well-informed about the dangers of natural hazards, while 38.4% felt somewhat informed and 13.9% felt uninformed. ▪ What incentives would encourage home protection from hazards? Top three responses:
o Rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (69.6%) o Insurance premium discounts (64.4%)
o Building permit fee waivers (47.4%)
▪ Top mitigation projects for local governments to focus on? Top responses:
o Work on improving damage resistance of utilities (79%) o Ensure emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center, and communication towers have backup power generators (62.6%)
o Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities (60.5%)
o Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (60.1%) o Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (58.7%) o Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (56.9%) As a result of the public survey, jurisdictions adjusted many of the priorities of various mitigation actions.
Some were moved from medium to high priority based on community feedback, or vice versa. Several jurisdictions added public outreach and education to their mitigation actions in response to survey emphasis on the same. Spanish-speaking outreach appears to be important moving forward from survey results as well. The survey results also included a higher-than-anticipated response rate for air quality concerns and extended power outages, both of which may be emphasized to a higher degree in the MJHMP.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 332 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 289 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-24
The complete survey results summary can be found in Appendix B.
Mitigation Action Plan
Table 5-6 lists each mitigation action for Solano
County. Each participating jurisdiction developed
unique mitigation actions as well, targeted at their
own unique priorities and vulnerabilities; these are
available on MAST (for participating jurisdictions
only) and in Volume 2 of this MJHMP. Each
mitigation action identifies the overall mitigation
goal being addressed, responsible party, time
frame, potential funding source, implementation
steps and resources needed to implement these
priority mitigation actions. As a living document,
hazard problem statements and mitigation
activities will be updated by participating
jurisdictions through MAST.
The detail provided in MAST and captured in Table
5-6 meets the regulatory requirements of FEMA
and DMA 2000.
The actions detailed in Table 5-6 and MAST
contain both new action items developed for this
plan update, as well as old actions that were yet to
be completed from the 2014 plan. The action
numbers indicate whether the action is new or from the 2014 plan. A sample of the action number nomenclature is presented in Figure 5-3.
Section 2, What’s New, illustrates progress towards new and previous mitigation actions and indicates how many actions have been completed, deleted, or are ongoing or pending.
Important to note: The Planning Committee realizes that new needs and priorities may arise as a result of a disaster or other circumstances and reserves the right to support new actions and edit existing actions as necessary as long as they conform to the overall goals of the plan.
Figure 5-3: Mitigation Action Number Key
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 333 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 290 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-25
Table 5-6: County Wide Mitigation Action Tracker
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-AH-SC-4 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Ensure Hospital Disaster
Preparedness Plan is updated
DRM, OES Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
3-5 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EQ-SC-125
ma-AH-SC-5 All Hazard PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Develop a multi-hazard
community outreach plan that
specifically includes outreach on
hazard preparedness and
mitigation to youth.
OES, Local Fire
Districts, Public
Information
Officer
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years 5% HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-116,
ps-SF-SC-133
ma-AH-SC-7 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Sponsor the formation and
training of Community
Emergency Response Teams
(CERTs)
OES, Local Fire
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-SF-SC-133,
ps-EQ-SC-125
ma-AH-SC-8 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Expand or participate in
expanding traditional disaster
exercises and drills involving
County emergency personnel.
OES Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-116
ma-AH-SC-9 All Hazard PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Convene Hazard Mitigation Group
to work together to ensure County
resiliency
OES, Public
Information
Officer
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-SF-SC-133
ma-AH-SC-10 All Hazard PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Update GIS Database/Mapping on
infrastructure and systems
OES, DRM
Public Works,
Assessor, Local
Fire Districts,
Sheriff's Office
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Ongoing Planning HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-118
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 334 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 291 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-26
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-AH-SC-11 All Hazard PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Pending 2014 Solano
County
Add Sirens to Community
Warning System
OES,
Information
Technology,
Public
Information
Officer
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ps-EQ-SC-125, ps-WF-SC-109
ma-AH-SC-12 All Hazard PRV -
Prevention
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Develop Farm and Animal
Emergency Preparedness and
Response Plans
OES,
Agricultural
Commissioner,
Solano Farm
Bureau,
Agricultural
Industry
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
5-10
Years
Planning HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 3:
Environment ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-WF-SC-109
ma-AH-SC-14 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2014 Solano
County
Conduct Additional Evacuation
and Emergency Planning for
Solano County
DRM Building &
Safety, Local
Fire Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC Extreme Goal 1: People ps-EQ-SC-125, ps-SF-SC-134,
ps-EQ-SC-123,
ps-EQ-SC-124,
ps-FL-SC-116,
ps-WF-SC-104,
ps-WF-SC-107
ma-DR-SC-162 Drought PRV -
Prevention ,
NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Replace irrigated landscaping
with drought resistant vegetation
and increase use of recycled
water for irrigation in County-
owned facilities
Department of
Resource
Management/
Pub Works;
Solano County
Water Agency
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 3:
Environment
ps-DR-SC-126,
ps-CC-SC-175
ma-DR-SC-163 Drought PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Update County's land use code to
include incentives for new
development to implement
drought tolerant landscaping that
requires less water.
Department of
Resource
Management
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 3:
Environment
ps-DR-SC-127,
ps-CC-SC-175
ma-DR-SC-201 Drought PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Develop countywide drought and
water shortage contingency plan
focused on small water systems
and individual domestic wells.
Resource
Mgmt;
coordinate with
SCWA
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-DR-SC-179
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 335 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 292 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-27
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-DR-SC-202 Drought PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Strengthen review of
groundwater supplies in
development review standards.
Resource
Mgmt,
Planning Dept.
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-DR-SC-179
ma-EQ-SC-16 Earthquake ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Evaluate critical heath facilities Hospitals are
primary, DHS,
PH, EMS,
General
Services
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
3-5 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-125
ma-EQ-SC-17 Earthquake SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Conduct storage tank evaluations SID
Administration,
Engineering,
Water and
Power
Operations,
Joint Power
Authorities
and/or special
Improvement
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-124
ma-EQ-SC-164 Earthquake PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Draft Natural Gas Shut-Off Valve
Ordinance
Community
Development
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-119
ma-EQ-SC-165 Earthquake PRV -
Prevention ,
SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Inspect buildings and install
seismic shut-off valves on gas
fixtures on County-owned critical
facilities and lines which
currently lack them.
Public Works/
Facilities
Maintenance
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-120
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 336 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 293 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-28
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-EQ-SC-166 Earthquake SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Retrofit county-owned historic
buildings, and ensure newer
building codes are implemented
and reinforced throughout the
county.
Public Works/
Comm Dev
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Ongoing Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-121,
ps-EQ-SC-122
ma-EQ-SC-167 Earthquake PRV -
Prevention ,
SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Inspect and conduct appropriate
retrofits to the 28 County bridges
within the 6.8 Concord Green
Valley EQ scenario.
Department of
Resource
Management/
Public Works
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-123
ma-EQ-SC-168 Earthquake SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Conduct annual inspections for
weak levees and maintain or
improve existing levees in critical
condition.
Public Works Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Annually N/A Internal
Funding
High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-SC-124
ma-EQ-SC-169 Earthquake PRV -
Prevention ,
PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Conduct public education
campaign on earthquake
preparedness and seismic
housing retrofits.
County PIO Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Annually 5% HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EQ-SC-125
ma-EW-SC-170 Extreme
Weather
ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Acquire back up generator for
Senior Center to ensure ability to
provide cooling center.
OES Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-SC-129,
ps-CC-SC-178
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 337 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 294 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-29
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-EW-SC-171 Extreme
Weather
PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Conduct a public education
campaign to increase awareness
of the negative effects of extreme
heat; include information on
steps that households can take to
mitigate these effects such as the
location of emergency cooling
centers.
County PIO Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Annually 5% HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-SC-129,
ps-CC-SC-178
ma-EW-SC-172 Extreme
Weather
PRV -
Prevention ,
NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Replace dying or dead evergreen
vegetation on City properties and
in rights-of-way with wind
resistant vegetation and
implement annual tree trimming
program.
Department of
Resource
Management/
Public Works
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Annually Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 3:
Environment
ps-EW-SC-131
ma-FL-SC-19 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Elevate Buildings in the
Repetitive Loss Areas
Department of
Resource
Management
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Ongoing Project HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA
High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EW-SC-128,
ps-FL-SC-116,
ps-CC-SC-174
ma-FL-SC-20 Flood PPRO -
Property
Protection
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Coordinate the Grants for
Building Elevation Between the
County and SCWA
DRM, OES,
SCWA
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
Ongoing Project HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA
Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EW-SC-128
ma-FL-SC-21 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Construct priority detention basin
projects and/or other flood
improvements. Identify priority
projects subject to future sea-
level rise impacts.
In partnership
with SCWA
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
5-10
Years
Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-112,
ps-FL-SC-116,
ps-CC-SC-174
ma-FL-SC-24 Flood PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Initiate an annual notification of
flood risk to the owners of all
buildings in special flood hazard
areas
DRM, OES,
Public
Information
Officer
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years 5% HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA
Medium Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-116,
ps-CC-SC-174
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 338 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 295 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-30
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-FL-SC-25 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Widen channels for the Ulatis
Flood Control Project
SCWA High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA
Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-113,
ps-CC-SC-176
ma-FL-SC-26 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Conduct outlet improvements for
Green Valley Flood Control
Project
SCWA Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-115,
ps-CC-SC-176
ma-FL-SC-28 Flood PRV -
Prevention
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Maintain flood channel
maintenance records.
DRM, SCWA,
Reclamation
and
Conservation
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-118
ma-FL-SC-29 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Remove sediment in reservoirs SCWA, SID Medium - The project could be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
5-10
Years
Project HMGP / BRIC Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-SC-128
ma-FL-SC-32 Flood NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Expand protected private and
public open space in the County.
DRM Planning,
Board of
Supervisors,
SCWA,
Resource
Conservation
Districts, Other
Conservation
Organizations
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 3:
Environment ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-116
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 339 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 296 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-31
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-FL-SC-173 Flood PRV -
Prevention ,
PPRO -
Property
Protection ,
NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Maintain clear passage for water
flow in the portion of Suisun
Creek west of Fairfield by
removing debris twice a year at
minimum.
Department of
Resource
Management
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Ongoing Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-117,
ps-WF-SC-114,
ps-CC-SC-176
ma-FL-SC-174 Flood PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Inventory drainages requiring
routine debris management;
develop debris management
schedule and maintain database
for this purpose
Dept. of
Resource
Management
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
Ongoing Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-SC-118,
ps-WF-SC-114,
ps-CC-SC-176
ma-SF-SC-175 Slope
Failure
SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Conduct appropriate retrofits for
County bridges in high landslide
areas and reinforce hazardous
slopes
Dept. of
Resource
Management
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-SF-SC-132
ma-SF-SC-176 Slope
Failure
SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Assess 2 child-care facilities in
high landslide risk areas; assist
property owners in appropriate
modifications including slope
reinforcements
Dept. of
Resource Mgmt
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-SF-SC-134
ma-SF-SC-177 Slope
Failure
PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Assess steep slope damages from
the 2020 LNU lightning complex
fire, including new areas
susceptible to slope failure.
OES; Resource
Mgmt
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-SF-SC-135
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 340 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 297 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-32
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-WF -SC-34 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Conduct annual Defensible Space
Inspection Program in the
Unincorporated County and
enforce Code violations.
Local Fire
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC Extreme Goal 1: People , Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-SC-130,
ps-WF-SC-110,
ps-WF-SC-111,
ps-WF-SC-106,
ps-CC-SC-177
ma-WF -SC-36 Wildfire ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Maintain and improve, where
needed, wildfire emergency
access
Local Fire
Districts, DRM
Public Works
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Extreme Goal 1: People ps-WF-SC-104, ps-WF-SC-107,
ps-WF-SC-108,
ps-WF-SC-108,
ps-WF-SC-109
ma-WF -SC-37 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2014 Solano
County
Develop Community Wildfire
Prevention Plan (CWPP) for
particularly high threat
neighborhoods and commuities;
support ongoing community
efforts to do the same.
Local Fire
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
5-10
Years
Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-SC-130,
ps-WF-SC-108,
ps-WF-SC-105,
ps-WF-SC-109,
ps-CC-SC-177
ma-WF -SC-38 Wildfire NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Pending 2014 Solano
County
Establish a County Chipper
Program
DRM, Local Fire
Districts
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-WF-SC-105,
ps-WF-SC-109
ma-WF -SC-40 Wildfire ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2014 Solano
County
Develop Spatial Data for Wildfire
Emergencies
OES, DRM Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to
be spread over multiple
years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-WF-SC-108,
ps-CC-SC-177
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 341 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 298 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5-33
Mitigation No.
Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description
Responsible
Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit
Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Priority Related Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-WF -SC-178 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention ,
PE&A -
Public
Education &
Awareness ,
ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2021 Solano
County
Establish egress routes from
Travis Air Force Base; potential
routes include Walters Road to
Highway 12
Solano County Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC High Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-WF-SC-108
Note: As a living document, project descriptions and actions in the tables above will be modified to reflect current conditions over time in MAST.
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 342 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 299 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-34
INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 343 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 300 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
6-1
Section 6. Plan Implementation and Maintenance
It is important that this plan becomes a tool for all participating jurisdictions to ensure reductions in possible damage from a natural hazard event. This section discusses adopting, implementing, monitoring, evaluating, and updating the MJHMP, which should help ensure that it remains relevant. This section also describes the incorporation of the MJHMP into existing planning mechanisms, and how the jurisdictions will continue to engage the public.
6.1 Plan Adoption
To comply with DMA 2000, the Solano County Board of Supervisors has officially adopted the Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan. The adoption of the MJHMP recognizes Solano County’s commitment to reducing the impacts of natural hazards within the county. A copy of the MJHMP adoption resolution is included immediately following the Executive Summary.
6.2 Plan Implementation
Over time, implementation strategies for mitigation actions will become more detailed. MAST will be extremely useful for participating jurisdictions to plan for updates to this MJHMP and to update individual mitigation actions as implemented or revised. In conjunction with the progress report processes, implementation strategy worksheets will be extremely useful as a plan of record tool for updates. Each implementation strategy worksheet provides individual steps and resources need to complete each priority mitigation action. The following are considerations for developing future implementation strategies:
▪ Use processes that already exist. Take advantage of the tools and procedures identified in the capability assessment in Section 5.4. Using planning mechanisms already in place and familiar to participating jurisdictions will give the planning implementation phase a strong initial boost. ▪ Updated work plans, policies, or procedure. Incorporating hazard mitigation concepts and activities can help integrate the MJHMP into daily operations. These changes can include how major development projects and subdivision reviews are addressed in hazard-prone areas or ensure that hazard mitigation concerns are considered in the approval of major capital improvement projects.
▪ Job descriptions. Working with department or agency heads to revise job descriptions of government staff to include mitigation-related duties, including designating a “mitigation lead” within a department, can further institutionalize hazard mitigation with little financial expenditure or programmatic overhaul.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 344 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 301 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-2
Steering Committee
The Steering Committee oversaw the development of the plan and made recommendations on key elements of the plan, including the maintenance strategy. The Steering Committee recommended that an oversight committee referred to herein as the MJHMP Steering Committee, should have an active role in the plan maintenance strategy. Therefore, it is recommended that the MJHMP Steering Committee become involved in key elements of the plan maintenance strategy. The new MJHMP Steering Committee should strive to include representation from the participating jurisdictions, as well as other stakeholder groups and members of the public in the planning area. Keeping this new MJHMP Steering Committee intact will also jump-start future updates.
The new MJHMP Steering Committee will review annual progress reports from participating jurisdictions and develop a county-wide report to provide input to Solano County, including to the Board of Supervisors, on possible improvements or action steps to be considered at the next update. Completion of a progress report is the responsibility of each participating jurisdiction. It will be the MJHMP Steering Committee’s role to review the individual progress reports and create a county-wide report that covers the unincorporated areas in an effort to identify revisions and issues needing to be addressed by future plans. These annual reports will also be released to the media and posted online for public review.
6.3 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the MJHMP
This section describes the schedule and process for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the MJHMP. The Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST) has been developed as a primary jurisdictional resource for updating and monitoring mitigation actions. See subsection 6.3.2 below for more information on MAST.
Schedule
Monitoring the progress of the mitigation actions will be ongoing throughout the five -year period between the adoption of the MJHMP and the next update effort. The newly-formed MJHMP Steering Committee will meet at least four times each year to monitor the implementation of mitigation actions and develop updates as necessary. The committee’s meeting schedule will be posted online, and meetings will be open to the public.
The MJHMP will be updated every five years, as required by DMA 2000. The update process will begin at least one year prior to the expiration of the MJHMP. However, should a significant disaster occur within the county, the MJHMP Steering Committee will reconvene within 30 days of the disaster to review and update the MJHMP as appropriate. The Solano County Board of Supervisors will adopt written updates to the MJHMP as a DMA 2000 requirement.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 345 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 302 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
6-3
Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST) Updates
Hazard problem statements and mitigation activities will be updated through a web interface application developed specifically for Solano County and other participating jurisdictions, available on the project website (mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/), to ensure this MJHMP remains a living document.
MAST is a web-based interactive tool that enables multiple users to search, view, enter, and update mitigation actions, ideas or projects, and other information. MAST provides participating jurisdiction staff and plan reviewers (Cal OES and FEMA) access to valuable mitigation information that can be leveraged by future planning or other risk reduction efforts. Users can update the status of their mitigation projects throughout the planning lifecycle and this web-based tool will improve a participating jurisdiction’s ability to apply for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grant programs, including the initial grant application processes through Cal OES.
Process
The MJHMP Steering Committee will coordinate with responsible agencies and organizations identified for each mitigation action. These responsible agencies and organizations will monitor and evaluate the progress made on the implementation of mitigation actions and report to the MJHMP Steering Committee on an annual basis. These responsible departments will assess the effectiveness of the mitigation actions and modify them as appropriate. MAST will assist mitigation project managers in reporting on the status and assessing the effectiveness of the mitigation actions. Most updates to the HMP will occur easily through MAST.
Information from the mitigation leads within responsible departments will be used to monitor mitigation actions and in the annual evaluation of the MJHMP. The following questions will be considered in evaluating MJHMP effectiveness:
▪ Has the nature or magnitude of hazards affecting the county and other jurisdictions changed? ▪ Are there new hazards that have the potential to impact the county and other jurisdictions? ▪ Do the identified goals and actions address current and expected conditions? ▪ Have mitigation actions been implemented or completed? ▪ Has the implementation of identified mitigation actions resulted in expected outcomes? ▪ Are current resources adequate to implement the MJHMP? ▪ Should additional local resources be committed to address identified hazards? Future updates to the MJHMP will account for any new hazard vulnerabilities, special circumstances, or new information that becomes available. Issues that arise or updates made during monitoring and evaluating the MJHMP will be incorporated into the next update of the MJHMP in 2026. The questions identified above would remain valid during the preparation of the update.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 346 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 303 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-4
Figure 6-1: Diagram of MAST Viewing Details
Continuing Public Involvement
During the five-year update cycle, county staff will involve the public through public workshops and quarterly Steering Committee meetings. Information on upcoming public events related to the MJHMP or solicitation for comments will be announced via newspapers, mailings, and on the county MJHMP website (mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/). An electronic copy of the current MJHMP document will be accessible through the county website, as well as at the County Courthouse in the City of Fairfield. The MJHMP Steering Committee will, as much as practicable, incorporate the following concepts into its public outreach strategy to ensure continued public involvement in the MJHMP planning process:
▪ Work with public service clubs (e.g., the Solano Sunset Rotary Club and the Solano County Library). ▪ Collaborate with faith-based organizations.
▪ Create story ideas for media outlets, such as newspapers, local radio, and TV. ▪ Distribute emails and postcards or mailers to county, city, and town residents about hazard mitigation updates.
▪ Post meeting announcements at city halls, community centers, coffee houses, grocery stores, etc.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 347 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 304 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
6-5
▪ Educate and collaborate with insurance companies, landlords, and realtors. ▪ Participate in other existing local community meeting places (e.g., Benicia Farmers Market, Fairfield Farmers Market, and Vacaville Farmers Market). ▪ Distribute information through K-12 schools.
▪ Continue to use the county website as a distribution point for hazard mitigation information.
HMA Monitoring
FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Program is the catalyst that drives increased understanding and supports proactive community action to reduce losses from natural hazards. To support this vision, FEMA funds three grant programs under HMA: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA), and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC). ▪ HMGP assists in implementing long-term hazard mitigation planning and projects following a Presidential major disaster declaration.
▪ BRIC provides funds for hazard mitigation planning and projects on an annual basis. ▪ FMA provides funds for planning and projects to reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to buildings that are insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) on an annual basis.
HMGP funding is generally 15 percent of the total amount of federal assistance provided to a state, territory, or federally-recognized tribe following a major disaster declaration. BRIC and FMA funding depends on the amount congress appropriates each year for those programs. HMGP supports cost-effective post-disaster projects and is the longest-running mitigation program among FEMA’s three grant programs. A 2019 study by the National Institute of Building Sciences’ (NIBS) Multihazard Mitigation Council has shown that every federal dollar spent on mitigation saves six dollars in response and recovery costs. (National Institute of Building Sciences, 2019, p. 116)
MAST will be extremely useful in applying for Cal OES funding. Plan maintenance will be primarily done through MAST. Figure 6-2 demonstrates how MAST information will translate into Cal OES NOIs and grant subapplication requests.
Following a disaster, Cal OES and local Solano County officials in a joint effort with FEMA will perform Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDA) of the areas that sustained damage. Cal OES submits, through the FEMA Regional Office, the information collected along with a damage estimate to request a declaration from the President. A Presidential Major Disaster Declaration provides for the availability of HMGP funds at the request of a state’s governor in eligible communities within a state, tribe, or territory. Figure 6-3 depicts this.
Figure 6-3 also shows a timeline of how projects should be developed and administered by local government and FEMA under the HMGP. HMGP grant recipients have 36 months from the close of the application period to complete projects. For more information on HMGP project development process visit:
fema.gov/hazard-mitigation-grant-program-guide-state/local-governments
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 348 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 305 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-6
Figure 6-2: MAST and Cal OES Grant Applications
Figure 6-3: HMGP Timeline
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 349 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 306 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
6-7
Incorporation into Other Planning Mechanisms
For the MJHMP to be successful, the recommendations and underlying principles of the HMP should be incorporated into community planning and development, such as capital improvement budgeting, building and zoning codes, general plans, and regional plans. Integration into a variety of departments at the county and participating jurisdiction level provides an opportunity to network, identify, and highlight mitigation activities and opportunities at all levels of gov ernment. It is also important to monitor funding opportunities that can be leveraged to implement the mitigation actions.
Each jurisdictional process for integration into other planning mechanisms will vary; the commitment to ongoing implementation meetings for the next five years will be essential to keeping this MJHMP relevant and at the forefront of planning processes. Some jurisdictions have ongoing updates that have already begun to incorporate data from the MJHMP.
Information from this MJHMP can be incorporated into the following. Note, this plan lists ongoing updates known at the time of this MJHMP. These are not meant to be exhaustive. ▪ Solano County and Municipal General Plans: The MJHMP will provide information that can be incorporated into the safety, land use, and conservation elements of general plans for municipalities and the county as they are updated. Many jurisdictions will update the safety element of the general plan to incorporate the MJHMP, in compliance with Assembly Bill 2140.
Specific risk and vulnerability information from the Solano County MJHMP will assist in identifying areas where development may be at risk to potential hazards, which in turn can be incorporated into general plans. For example, jurisdictions may consider instituting a hazard overlay zone that requires additional scrutiny because of close proximity to certain hazards. o The City of Fairfield is currently updating its General Plan; coordination on incorporating data from this MJHMP is ongoing.
▪ Building and Development Codes and Zoning Ordinances: The MJHMP provides information to enable the county and municipalities to make decisions on appropriate building and development codes and ordinances. Appropriate building codes and ordinances can increase resilience against natural disasters. Some county and municipal mitigation actions directly recommend updates or new regulations as mitigation for hazard risks; those mitigation actions indicate priorities for regulatory updates in participating jurisdictions.
▪ Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP): The MJHMP will provide information that can be incorporated into a CWPP or Strategic Fire Plan for areas within the county. Development of a county-wide or localized CWPP is a county mitigation action that may be implemented during this planning period.
▪ Water and Flood Management Plans: The MJHMP will provide information that can be included in updates of urban water management plans, the Solano Groundwater Sustainability Plan, the Lower Sacramento River/Delta North Regional Flood Management Plan, and other water or flood management plans. While the process for updating these types of plans will vary by jurisdiction, FINAL for adoption Packet Page 350 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 307 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-8
the flood data developed for the MJHMP can be used in other mechanisms along with exposure and damage estimation information.
o The City of Suisun City is developing a Flood Resiliency Plan in collaboration with Sustainable Solano and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission; coordination on incorporating data from this MJHMP is ongoing. o The City of Benicia is currently updating its Urban Water Management Plan, which includes its Stormwater Management Plan; coordination on incorporating data from this MJHMP is ongoing.
o A county-wide collaborative of five groundwater sustainability agencies are jointly developing Solano County’s Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP); participating jurisdictions will carry forward the MJHMP for consideration in this GSP. ▪ Climate Action Plans: The MJHMP includes detailed climate vulnerability information that can be a useful first step in developing or updating a climate action plan. o The City of Fairfield is currently developing a Climate Action Plan in conjunction with updating its General Plan; coordination on incorporating data from this MJHMP is ongoing. ▪ Other Plans: Participating jurisdictions are developing an array of plans that overlap with considerations from this MJHMP. The planning process for the development of the MJHMP identified several relevant ongoing planning processes and opportunities to integrate the MJHMP.
Those ongoing planning processes include:
o The City of Benicia and ongoing development of a Vegetation Management Plan and Parks and Trails Master Plan.
Planning Integration Processes
With adoption of this plan, Solano County and participating jurisdictions will be responsible for the plan implementation and maintenance. The County and the MJHMP Steering Committee will continue to:
▪ Act as a forum for hazard mitigation issues;
▪ Disseminate hazard mitigation ideas and activities to Solano County communities; ▪ Ensure hazard mitigation risk assessments and maps remain a consideration for safety decision- makers;
▪ Report on plan progress and recommended changes; and
▪ Inform and solicit input from the public.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 351 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 308 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-1
Section 7. Works Cited
Ackerly. (2018). San Francisco Bay Area Summaryy Report. Retrieved 01 21, 2021, from https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/
American Community Survey. (2018). Explore Census Data. Retrieved 01 25, 2021, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
Bedsworth. (2018). Statewide Summary Report: California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved 01 21, 2021, from https://www.climateassessment.ca.gov/state/ Blume, H. (2019, 12 06). PG&E reaches $13.5-billion settlement with victims of devastating California wildfires. LA Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-12-06/pge- settlement-fire-northern-california
CAL FIRE. (2020). LNU Lightning Complex (includes Hennessey, Gamble, 15-10, Spanish, Markley, 13-4, 11-16, Walbridge). Retrieved from https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/8/17/lnu-lightning-complex- includes-hennessey-gamble-15-10-spanish-markley-13-4-11-16-walbridge/ Cal OES. (2018). State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/002- 2018%20SHMP_FINAL_ENTIRE%20PLAN.pdf#search=404
Cal. Adaptation Planning Guide. (2020). Cal OES. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/CA-Adaptation-Planning-Guide- FINAL-June-2020-Accessible.pdf
Cal. Dep't of Water Resources. (2015). California's Most Significant Droughts: Comparing Historical and Recent Conditions.
Cal-Adapt. (2020). Extended Drought Scenarios. Retrieved from https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extended- drought/
CalAdapt. (2021). Extreme Heat. ( Geospatial Innovation Facility at University of California, Berkeley) Retrieved from CalAdapt Tool: https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extreme-heat/ Cal-Adapt. (2021). Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights. Retrieved 03 10, 2021, from https://cal- adapt.org/tools/extreme-heat/
Cal-Adapt. (2021). Extreme Precipitation. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extreme- precipitation/#lat=38.2854&lng=-122.0000&boundary=counties&climatevar=Precipitation Cal-Adapt. (2021). Local Climate Change Snapshot for Solano County. Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from https://cal-adapt.org/tools/local-climate-change-snapshot/ FINAL for adoption Packet Page 352 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 309 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-2
Cal-Adapt. (2021). Local Climate Change Snapshot for Solano County, California. Retrieved 01 21, 2021, from https://cal-adapt.org/tools/local-climate-change-snapshot/ California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. (2005). Fire Management Plan. Retrieved 01 13, 2021, from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/17277043/sonoma-lake-napa-fire-plan-board- of-forestry-and-fire-
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. (2013‐2018). California Cooperative Wildland Fire Management and Stafford Act Response Agreement. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://gacc.nifc.gov/oscc/cwcg/docs/2013cfma/FinalCFMA2013-2018.pdf California Department of Water Resources. (2015). California's Most Significant Droughts. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/What-We-Do/Drought- Mitigation/Files/Publications-And-Reports/CalSigDroughts19_v9_ay11.pdf (2010). California Drought Contingency Plan. California Department of Water Resources. Retrieved 05 14, 2020, from
https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/waterplan/docs/cwpu2013/Final/vol4/drought/01California_Drou ght_Contigency_Plan.pdf
California Employment Development Department. (2019). Agricultural Employment in California. Retrieved 01 26, 2020, from Occupational Employment Statistics and Wages (OES) Employment and Wages:
https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/oes-employment-and-wages.html California Fire. (2020). Red Flag Warning & Fire Weather Watches. Retrieved from https://www.fire.ca.gov/programs/communications/red-flag-warnings-fire-weather-watches/ California Legislative Information. (n.d.). Public Resources Code. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PRC§ionNum=41
02.&article=1.&highlight=true&keyword=%EF%82%A7%09State%20Responsibility%20Areas%20 California Office of Emergency Services. (2018). California State Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/cal-oes-divisions/hazard-mitigation/hazard-mitigation-planning/state- hazard-mitigation-plan
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2019). Heat Related Mortality and Morbidity. Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from https://oehha.ca.gov/epic/impacts-biological-systems/heat- related-mortality-and-morbidity
California Public Utilities Commission. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/deenergization/ California Seismic Safety Commission. (2002, July 11). Improving Natural Gas Safety in Earthquakes.
Retrieved from https://ssc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2020/08/cssc_2002- 03_natural_gas_safety.pdf
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 353 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 310 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-3
California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. (2018). Statewide Summary Report. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Statewide_Reports-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 013_Statewide_Summary_Report_ADA.pdf
Caltrans. (2021). Long-Term Socio-Economic Forecasts by County. Retrieved 01 25, 2021, from https://dot.ca.gov/programs/transportation-planning/economics-data- management/transportation-economics/long-term-socio-economic-forecasts-by-county CDC. (2013). Climate Change and Extrememe Heat Events. Center for Disease Control. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/pubs/ClimateChangeandExtremeHeatEvents.pdf CDC. (2017). About Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/heat_guide.html CDC. (2020). Mold After a Disaster. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/mold/index.html
CDC. (2021). Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/index.html
CDWR. (2021). Urban Water Management Plans. Retrieved from Colorado Dept. of Water Resources:
https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Water-Use-And-Efficiency/Urban-Water-Use-Efficiency/Urban- Water-Management-Plans
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (n.d.). Wildfires and Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.c2es.org/content/wildfires-and-climate-change/ CGS. (2020). Rockfall. Retrieved from Colorado Geological Survey:
https://coloradogeologicalsurvey.org/hazards/rockfall/
CGS. (2020). Seismic Shaking Hazard Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Pages/PSHA/shaking-assessment.aspx City and County of San Francisco Hazard Mitigation Plan. (2014). 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Climate Central. (2013). Lighning-Caused Wildfires. Retrieved 09 30, 2020, from https://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/lightning-caused-wildfires County of Solano and Solano Economic Development Corporation. (2020). Solano County 2019: Index of Economic and Community Progress. Retrieved January Tuesday, 2021, from https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=32160 D. Branum, R. C. (2016). Earthquake Shaking Potential for California. CGS. Retrieved 04 07, 2020, from https://ssc.ca.gov/forms_pubs/shaking_18x23.pdf
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 354 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 311 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-4
Department of Environmental Conservation. (2020). State of Vermont. Retrieved from https://dec.vermont.gov/waste-management/spills
Department of Water Resources. (2020). California’s Most Significant Droughts: Comparing Historical and Recent Conditions. Retrieved from https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/What- We-Do/Drought-Mitigation/Files/Publications-And-Reports/a6022_CalSigDroughts19_v9_ay11.pdf DWR. (2021). Countywide Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plans. Retrieved from California Division of Water Resources: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Water-Use-And-Efficiency/2018- Water-Conservation-Legislation/County-Drought-Planning
EPA. (2021). Learn About Environmental Justice. Retrieved 08 31, 2021, from https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/learn-about-environmental-justice Federal Highway Administration. (2013). A Guide for Maintaining Pedestrian Facilities for Enhanced Safety. Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa13037/chap3.cfm FEMA. (2020). Data Feeds. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/data-sets FEMA. (2020, 07 31). Types of Floods and Floodplains. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/fmc/chapter%202%20- %20types%20of%20floods%20and%20floodplains.pdf
FEMA. (2020). Wildland urban interface (WUI). Retrieved from https://www.usfa.fema.gov/wui/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). Direct and Indirect Effects of Sea-Level Rise. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/nr/climpag/pub/eire0047_en.asp Geology.com. (2020). Tsunami Geology - What Causes a Tsunami. Retrieved from https://geology.com/articles/tsunami-geology.shtml
Governor's Office of Planning and Research. (2017). State of California General Plan Guidelines. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf Grantham, T. (2018). North Coast Summary Report, California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment.
University of California, Berkley. Retrieved 07 30, 2020, from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 001_NorthCoast_ADA.pdf
Grantham, Teodore; University of California, Berkeley. (2018). California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report- SUM-CCCA4-2018-001_NorthCoast_ADA.pdf
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 355 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 312 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-5
Harvard School of Public Health. (2021, Aug. 13). Press Release: Wildfire smoke may have contributed to thousands of extra COVID-19 cases and deaths in western U.S. in 2020. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/wildfire-smoke-may-have-contributed-to- thousands-of-extra-covid-19-cases-and-deaths-in -western-u-s-in-2020/ Krause, E., & Reeves, R. (2017, Sept. 18). Hurricans hit the poor the hardest. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from Brookings Institute: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility- memos/2017/09/18/hurricanes-hit-the-poor-the-hardest/
Leah Fisher, Sonya Ziaja. (2018). California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Statewide_Reports-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 013_Statewide_Summary_Report_ADA.pdf
Levin, Phil; Davies, Ian. (2019, Nov. 6). Racial and Ethnic Minorities are More Vulnerable to Wildfires.
Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from The Conversation: http://theconversation.com/racial-and-ethnic- minorities-are-more-vulnerable-to-wildfires-106290
Lutz, H. (2018, February 21). Napa grapegrowers brace for extended frost season, with little rain. Retrieved from Napa Valley Register: https://napavalleyregister.com/news/local/napa-grapegrowers-brace- for-extended-frost-season-with-little-rain/article_74a4eca7-b723-5ebd-abdf-61a2ba7e4958.html Maizlish. (2017). Climate Change and Health Profile Report Solano County. Retrieved 01 25, 2021, from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/CDPH%20Document%20Library/CHPRs/CHPR095Solano_ County2-23-17.pdf
Makwana, N. (2019). Disaster and its impact on mental health: A narrative review. Retrieved 08 31, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857396/ Manconi, A. e. (2016). Real-time detection, location, and characterization of Rockslides using broadband regional seismic networks. Retrieved from
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2016GL069572 Marin Clean Energy. (2020). MCE Community Choice Energy. Retrieved 01 26, 2021, from https://www.mcecleanenergy.org/
Murphy, M. (2006, December 2006). Vaca Flood Woes Top Story of '06. Retrieved from The Reporter:
https://www.thereporter.com/2006/12/31/vaca-flood-woes-top-story-of-06/ National Center for Disaster Preparedness. (2020). Vulnerable Populations. Retrieved 01 24, 2020, from https://ncdp.columbia.edu/research/vulnerable-populations/ National Institute of Building Sciences. (2017). Publications. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/media- library-data/1516812817859-9f866330bd6a1a93f54cdc61088f310a/MS2_2017InterimReport.pdf FINAL for adoption Packet Page 356 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 313 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-6
National Institute of Building Sciences. (2019). Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves. Retrieved 02 04, 2021, from https://www.nibs.org/page/mitigationsaves
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. (2016). Drought. Retrieved from https://niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/students/drought National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration . (2020). What are El Niño and La Niña? Retrieved from National Ocean Service: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/ninonina.html National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2018). Tsunamis. Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts/tsunamis National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). Is Sea Level Rising. Retrieved from https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html
National Park Service. (2018). Wildfire Causes and Evaluations. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/articles/wildfire-causes-and-
evaluation.htm#:~:text=Humans%20and%20Wildfire,and%20intentional%20acts%20of%20arson.
National Research Council. (2012). Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington:
Past, Present, and Future. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13389/sea-level-rise-for- the-coasts-of-california-oregon-and-washington
National Weather Service. (n.d.). Red Flag Warning. Retrieved August 2020, from https://www.weather.gov/mqt/redflagtips#:~:text=A%20Red%20Flag%20Warning%20means,increas ed%20risk%20of%20fire%20danger.&text=%2DExtinguish%20all%20outdoor%20fires%20properly,is% 20cold%20to%20the%20touch.
National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (n.d.). Wildland Urab Interface. Retrieved June 4, 2020, from https://www.nwcg.gov/term/glossary/wildland-urban-interface-wui NOAA. (2017). Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States. Silver Spring, Maryland.
Retrieved 07 27, 2020, from
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/techrpt83_Global_and_Regional_SLR_Scenarios_f or_the_US_final.pdf
NOAA. (2018). Ask the scientist: How can the weather spark and spread wildfires? Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/stories/ask-scientist-how-can-weather-spark-and-spread-wildfires NOAA. (2020). Storm Events Database. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from National Centers for Environmental Information: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/eventdetails.jsp?id=5486532 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2021). CalEnviroScreen 4.0. Retrieved 08 31, 2021, from https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/draft-calenviroscreen-40 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 357 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 314 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-7
Office of the State Fire Marshal. (2021). Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-planning-engineering/wildfire-prevention- engineering/fire-hazard-severity-zones/
OPR Planning and Investing for a Resilient California. (n.d.). A Guidebook for State Agencies. 19. Retrieved from https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20180313-Building_a_Resilient_CA.pdf Pacific Northwest Seismic Network. (n.d.). Ground Motion. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://pnsn.org/outreach/earthquakehazards/ground-motion R. Dean Hardy, Mathew E. Hauer. (2018). Social vulnerability projections improve sea-level rise risk assessments. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://mathewhauer.github.io/papers/2018- AppliedGeographerHardyHauer.pdf
Ready.gov. (2021). Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://www.ready.gov/heat#:~:text=Extreme%20heat%20is%20a%20period,which%20can%20lead% 20to%20death.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center. (2012). Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Historical Ecology Investigation: Exploring Pattern and Process. Retrieved 02 26, 2021, from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs//bay_delta/california_waterf ix/exhibits/docs/swrcb_100.pdf
Seismic Safety Commission. (2009). The Field Act and its Relative Effectiveness in. Retrieved from ssc.ca.gov: https://ssc.ca.gov/forms_pubs/cssc_09-02_the_field_act_report_appendices.pdf Shahir Masri et al. (2021). Disproportionate Impacts of Wildfires among Elderly and Low-Income Communities in California from 2000–2020. Retrieved 08 31, 2021, from https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3921
Sherwin, B. (2019). After the Storm: The Importance of Acknowledging Environmental Justice in Sustainable Development and Disaster Preparedness. Retrieved 08 31, 2021, from https://delpf.law.duke.edu/article/after-the-storm-sherwin-vol29-iss2/ Solano County 2017-2020 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. (2017). Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. Retrieved 01 05, 2021, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz0KtN0Uw9zcang1NEJzRU9PbUE/view Solano County. (2018, October 2). Solano County Component of the Suisun Marsh Local Protection Program (Draft). Retrieved from
https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=29446 Solano County. (2020). 2020 LNU Lightning Complex Fire. Retrieved 01 14, 2021, from https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/2020_lnu_lightning_complex_fire/default.asp FINAL for adoption Packet Page 358 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 315 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-8
Solano County. (2020). After Action Report & Improvement Plan.
Solano County Agricultural Department. (2020). 2020 Crop and Livestock Report.
Solano County Cimate Action Plan. (2011). County of Solano Climate Action Plan. Retrieved 01 26, 2021, from
https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=10080#:~:text=The%20Cli mate%20Action%20Plan%20is,win%20conditions%20along%20the%20way.
Solano County General Plan. (2008). General Plan. Retrieved January Monday, 2021, from https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/rm/planning/general_plan.asp Solano County Sea Level Rise Strategic Program. (2011). County of Solano Sea Level Rise Strategic Program.
Retrieved 01 25, 2021, from
https://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=11108 Solano HMP. (2014). Retrieved from
https://www.solanocounty.com/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=20107 Solano LAFCO MSR. (2020). Solano County Reclamation/ Levee Districts Municipal Service Revise.
Fairfield, CA: Prepared by Milani & Associates, Craft Consulting Group, and MMS Designs.
Syphard, J. K. (2019). Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated fires. Retrieved from Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind- dominated fires
The National Severe Storms Laboratory. (2020, 07 31). SEVERE WEATHER 101. Retrieved May 17, 2020, from https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/floods/types/ Thompson, A. (2014, Nov. 13). Lighning May Increase with Global Warming. Scientific American. Retrieved 09 30, 2020, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lightning-may-increase-with-global- warming/
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Public Health Emergency. Retrieved from https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/abc/Pages/afn-guidance.aspx U.S. Dep't of Ag. (2017). Hired Farm Labor, Workers and Payroll. Retrieved 01 26, 2020, from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service:
https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/CDQT/chapter/2/table/7/state/CA/county/055/year/2017 United States Census Bureau. (2019). Income and Poverty in the United States: 2017. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60- 270.html#:~:text=Median%20household%20income%20was%20%2468%2C703,and%20Table%20A%2 D1).
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 359 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 316 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-9
United States Department of Agriculture. (2021, 8 13). Emergency Disaster Designation and Declaration Process. Retrieved from USDA Farm Service Agency: https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA- Public/usdafiles/FactSheets/emergency_disaster_designation_declaration_process-factsheet.pdf United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Alluvial Fan Process Group. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Fire Effects on the Environment. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/page/fire-effects-environment United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Climate Impacts on Agriculture and Food Supply.
Retrieved from https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impacts- agriculture-and-food-supply_.html
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Climate Change Indicators. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/weather-climate United States Forest Service. (n.d.). Prescribed Fire. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/prescribed-fire
United States Geological Survey. (2004). Landslide Types and Processes. Retrieved from https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3072/fs-2004-3072.html
United States Geological Survey. (2004). Landslide Types and Processes. Retrieved from https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3072/fs-2004-3072.html
United States Geological Survey. (2005). NOAA-USGS Debris-Flow Warning System-Final Report. Retrieved from https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2005/1283/pdf/Circular1283.pdf United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Landslide Hazards. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/natural- hazards/landslide-hazards
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/modified-mercalli-intensity- scale?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Pacific Coastal Fog Project. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.usgs.gov/centers/wgsc/science/pacific-coastal-fog-project?qt- science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Science of Earthquakes. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake- hazards/science/science-earthquakes?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects FINAL for adoption Packet Page 360 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 317 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-10
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Science of Earthquakes. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake- hazards/science/science-earthquakes?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). What Are the Long Term Effects of Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-are-long-term-effects-climate-change-1?qt- news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). What is liquefaction? Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-liquefaction?qt-news_science_products=0#qt- news_science_products
University of California, Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. (2020). Projects and Research Programs.
Retrieved from https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/
US Department of Energy. (2019). Extreme Weather and Climate Vulnerabilities of the Electric Grid.
Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f67/Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Laboratory%20E IS%20Response.pdf
US EPA. (2020). Green Infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/manage- flood-risk
USGS. (2014). M6.0 South Napa, California Earthquake – August 24, 2014. Retrieved 01 12, 2021, from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/m60-south-napa-california- earthquake-august-24-2014?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects USGS. (2016). Effects of Urban Development on Floods. Retrieved from US Geological Survey Science for a Changing World: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs07603/
USGS. (2020). 2018 United States (Lower 48) Seismic Hazard Long-term Model. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/2018-united-states-lower-48- seismic-hazard-long-term?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects USGS. (2020). Does human activity cause landslides? Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/do- human-activities-cause-landslides?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products USGS. (2020). Increases in Wildfire-Caused Erosion Could Impact Water Supply and Quality in the West.
Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/news/increases-wildfire-caused-erosion-could-impact- water-supply-and-quality-west-2
USGS. (n.d.). Earthquake Hazards 201 - Technical Q&A. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://137.227.224.120/hazards/learn/technical.php#accel FINAL for adoption Packet Page 361 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 318 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7-11
Watershed Emergency Response Team. (2020). LNU Lightening Complex Hennessey Fire. Retrieved 03 26, 2021
Western Regional Climate Center. (2020). Climate of California. Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/narrative_ca.php
Western Regional Climate Center. (2020). Climate of California. Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/narrative_ca.php
Wiebold, B. (2007). Flood Effects on Grain Crops. Retrieved from University of Missouri Extension:
https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/agw1014
Yana S. Valachovic et al. (2011). Sudden Oak Death-caused Changes to Surface Fuel Loading and Potential Fire Behavior in Douglas-fir-tanoak Forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 1973-1986.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 362 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 319 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL for adoption Packet Page 363 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 320 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-1
A
Appendix A. Analysis Methodology
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 364 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 321 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-2
A vulnerability assessment was conducted using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for each of the priority hazards identified by the Planning Committee. Several sources of data are necessary to conduct a vulnerability analysis. This appendix presents an outline of the data inputs, processing steps, and outputs used to create the vulnerability analysis results presented in the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). The analysis methodology is presented first, followed by an overview of the analysis data.
A.1. Natural Hazard Exposure
The natural hazard exposure analysis (see C. Natural Hazard Exposure in Figure 7-4) is an inventory of population, parcels, critical facilities, and other assets within each natural hazard area. As shown in Figure 7-1, the presence of a structure inside a natural hazard area (the flood zone in this example) qualifies that structure as exposed to the natural hazard.
Figure 7-1: Hazard Exposure
The total counts of parcels, people, facilities, and assets and the sum of values within the planning area which could be exposed to a hazard event are referred to as the “exposure” in this plan. A natural hazards overlay was developed to reflect the combination of many known natural hazard spatial footprints. The spatial overlay method enables summarization of building values, parcel counts, population exposure, and critical facility exposure within a hazard’s geographic extents (see C. Natural Hazard Exposure in Figure 7-4). The input data is used to evaluate exposure for wildfire, flood, areas protected by levee, dam inundation, earthquake, liquefaction, faults of required investigation, landslide, sea-level rise, and tsunami run-up.
Damage Estimation with Hazus
FEMA’s Hazus software was implemented to conduct a detailed loss estimation for flood, earthquake, and dam inundation. Hazus is a nationally applicable standardized methodology that contains models for estimating potential losses from earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. Hazus uses GIS technology to estimate physical, economic, and social impacts of disasters. For purposes of this planning effort, Hazus was used to generate damage estimations due to possible earthquakes and flooding. The estimated damage and losses FINAL for adoption Packet Page 365 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 322 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-3
provided by the Hazus Software provide the ability to understand possible widescale damage to buildings and facilities.
In the hypothetical geography shown in Figure 7-3, even though both structures are exposed to flooding, it is expected that the structure with a first floor height below the depth of flooding will receive significantly more damage than the structure with a first floor height above the expected water depth. Note that not all building data contains first floor height, and first floor height is an example of the type of field utilized by Hazus in calculating damage estimates.
Figure 7-2: Flood Depth and Damage Curves
Figure 7-3: Hazus Damage Estimations
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 366 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 323 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-4
Damage estimations are shown for improved jurisdictional real property assets for flood and earthquake for all jurisdictions in Section A.2.4. Unincorporated insured assets received from a county-provided list are shown in Section A.2.5; improved parcels were filtered out of this longer dataset for Hazus estimated damage results as shown in Section A.2.4 (which includes improved assets for all jurisdictions with some measure of damage estimated for each hazard). Jurisdictions may access other, non-incorporated insured asset rolls through mitigatehazards.com/solanoHMP.
Hazus is a FEMA product with highly detailed documentation provided on the analysis steps and algorithms performed against the input data and associated scenarios in the process of obtaining loss estimates. The explanation in this appendix section is simplified. Refer to the full documentation and technical manuals from FEMA for greater explanation on Hazus specifics.
Distinguishing Results – Natural Hazard Exposure Analysis vs Hazus Results Table and chart references throughout the hazard mitigation plan are explicitly called out for Hazus results as “Damage Estimates”. There are expected differences in the results between estimations of Natural Hazard overlays and detailed Hazus results. Snapshot tables and Natural Hazard Exposure sections do not contain Hazus estimates.
A.2. Analysis Data
Assets, Value, and Population
A.2.1.1. Parcels
County-provided parcel geometry was joined with County Assessor data. Centroids were created to represent parcels at a single location. Fields required by Hazus that were not present in the parcel data provided were given default values based on the mapped use-codes of each parcel. Earthquake building design level attribution was based on year built (where the default was 1972) and building code adaptation chronology. Improved parcels were chosen for the parcels dataset by a query of improvement value presence, building area, and use-code descriptors. Where building area values were present, a replacement cost of $250 per square foot was used in place of assessed values.
A.2.1.2. Asset Insurance Schedules
County and jurisdictional insurance schedules were used in developing Real Property Asset data with valuations and structural data for analyses. These assets were utilized in Hazus damage estimate analysis as well as vulnerability exposure analysis. The tabular data were geocoded and quality checked for building placement. This data is presented in the exposure analysis as “Real Property Assets” and in Hazus results FINAL for adoption Packet Page 367 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 324 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-5
as government and emergency occupancy categories. There is some overlap with Real Property Asset data and the other critical infrastructure classifications..
A.2.1.3. Population
Population estimates were derived from 2014-2018 five-year U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) numbers as applied to Census block groups and Census Place geographies, then processed through GIS modeling in order to break down the proportional population for smaller units of area in relation to natural hazards.
A.2.1.4. Critical Infrastructure
Critical facilities and transportation/lifeline typically include hospitals, fire stations, police stations, storage of critical records, and similar facilities. These data came from a collection of sources, including but not limited to: county GIS, county and local jurisdiction insurance data, CDSS, CEC, FCC, Hazus, USACE, NBI, FEMA, and NPS. All data sources have a level of accuracy acceptable for planning purposes.
Table 7-7 is a complete list of Critical Infrastructure data used in the analysis.
A.2.1.5. Hazus Inputs
Hazus data inputs include hazard scenario data and detailed building data. The GIS team conducted a Level 2 analysis utilizing user-defined buildings with refined building characteristic parameters as inputs for the damage estimation calculations (see A.2.1.1 and A.2.1.2). Both county-wide building data and real property assets were used as inputs in this level 2 analysis. The customized user defined building dataset allows for more accurate results for damage estimation based upon detailed building characteristics.
Note: FEMA’s Hazus software utilizes different user defined building information inputs to develop loss estimates depending on the hazard module. The Hazus flood and earthquake modules use fragility curves based upon the user’s definition of building characteristics, including but not limited to:
▪ Area
▪ Year Built
▪ Construction Type
▪ Number of Stories
▪ First Floor Height
▪ EQ Design Level
▪ Occupancy Type (Residential, Government, etc.)
▪ Building Values
Defaults were used for missing fields and values based on use-code and other available information for that input.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 368 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 325 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-6
Natural Hazard Data
A.2.2.1. Earthquake Shaking
The CGS two percent chance – 50-year probability map was used as a qualitative guide in selecting an earthquake epicenter-based shakemap scenario for analyses. The M6.8 Concord Green Valley and M7.1 Hayword Rodger’s Creek earthquake scenarios and shakemaps were used in this plan’s analyses.
Earthquake Scenario MMI Shaking Intensity
M6.8 Concord Green Valley & M7.1 Hayword Rodgers Creek EQ Scenarios Intensity MMI Description/Damage
I-Not felt 0-1 Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.
II-Weak 1-2 Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings.
III-Weak 2-3
Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.
Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck. Duration estimated.
IV-Light 3-4
Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.
V-Moderate 4-5 Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop.
VI-Strong 5-6 Felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight.
VII-Very strong 6-7
Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken.
VIII-Severe 7-8
Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned.
IX-Violent 8-9
Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse.
Buildings shifted off foundations.
X-Extreme 9-10 Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent.
Source: USGS Scenario MMI Grid
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 369 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 326 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-7
A.2.2.2. Liquefaction
USGS earthquake caused liquefaction susceptibility by type and age of quaternary deposits.
Liquefaction Susceptibility
Hazard Native Class Description
Very Low VL
Very Low susceptibility to liquefaction delineated by type and age of Quaternary deposits. Not Shown
Low L
Low susceptibility to liquefaction delineated by type and age of Quaternary deposits.
Medium M
Medium susceptibility to liquefaction delineated by type and age of Quaternary deposits.
High H
High susceptibility to liquefaction delineated by type and age of Quaternary deposits.
Very High VH
Very High susceptibility to liquefaction delineated by type and age of Quaternary deposits.
Source: USGS Liquefaction Susceptibility
A.2.2.3. Fault Zones Requiring Investigation
Quaternary faults (USGS) and associated zones requiring investigation as provided by CGS.
Quaternary Faults and Zones of Required Investigation
Hazard Native Class Description
Zone of Investigation Area of Required
Investigation
Site-specific investigations are required for certain
developments within the zones depicted on these areas and, if the potential for the hazard is found to exist, plans to mitigate the hazard must be provided prior to a lead agency issuing a permit for construction.
Source: CGS
A.2.2.4. Dam Inundation Zones
Dam inundation zone GIS data were provided by Cal OES and DWR. These represent the estimated flood extent in the event of dam failure for individual dams.
Dam Inundation Area
Hazard Description
Inundation Area
CalOES dam inundation maps show the maximum extent of damage of a flood wave emanating from a dam failure. Dam Inundation maps for the State of California are required by California Government Code Section 8589.5(b). DWR Dam Breach Inundation studies included for those with Downstream Hazard ratings of Extremely High.
Source: Cal OES, DWR
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 370 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 327 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-8
A.2.2.5. Flood Zones
The input parameters for Hazus analysis of Flood exposure included depth grids created with the FEMA Flood Zone data mentioned in section A.2.2.5. 100-YR and 500-YR were scenarios used to analyze the exposure to inputs as depicted in Figure 7-4. 100-YR Coastal and FEMA areas protected by levee were analyzed in the exposure analysis with limited findings of exposure. NLD Areas Behind Levee were analyzed in the exposure analysis supplementally.
FEMA Flood Hazard
Hazard Flood Zone Description
100-YR Flood
[SFHA]
Subtype: Floodway
A "Regulatory Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. Communities must regulate development in these floodways to ensure that there are no increases in upstream flood elevations.
SFHA outside
Floodway
The land area covered by the floodwaters of the base flood is the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on NFIP maps. The SFHA is the area where the National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP's) floodplain management regulations must be enforced and the area where the mandatory purchase of flood insurance applies.
100-YR Coastal
[SFHA] Coastal SFHA
Zone VE, also known as a Coastal High Hazard Area, is considered one of the areas of highest risk depicted on FIRMs. Zone VE is designated where wave hazards are expected to be particularly strong and have the potential to cause dramatic structural damage.
https://www.fema.gov/coastal-flood-risk-study-process
500-YR Flood
[non-SFHA]
Subtypes: 0.2%
Annual Chance,
Protected by Levee
Moderate risk areas within the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, and areas protected from the 1- percent-annual-chance flood by a levee. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones.
Protected by Levee
[non-SFHA] Protected by Levee Areas protected from the 1-percent-annual-chance flood by a levee. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones.
Source: FEMA MSC DFIRM
A.2.2.6. Area Behind Levee
An Area Behind Levee is an area of a floodplain from which water is excluded by the levee system. National Levee Database (USACE). Differs from FEMA protected by levee areas.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 371 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 328 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-9
Area Protected by Levee
Hazard Native Class Description
Area Behind Levee Areas Defined in
NLD
Area of a floodplain from which water is excluded by the levee system.
National Levee Database (USACE)
Source: National Levee Database - United States Army Corps of Engineers
A.2.2.7. Landslide Susceptibility
GIS layer with geographic boundaries defining the likelihood of deep-seated landslides. Underlying geology and slope angle are used in the creation of this layer by the California Geological Society. Low, Medium, and High landslide classes were chosen as summary classes for this plan.
Landslide Susceptibility
Hazard Description
Low 1-5
These classes express the generalization that on very low slopes, landslide susceptibility is low even in weak materials, and that landslide susceptibility increases with slope and in weaker rocks.
Medium 6-7 Very high landslide susceptibility, classes VIII, IX, and X, includes moderate and steep slopes in hard rocks and weak rocks.
High 8-10 Very high landslide susceptibility, classes VIII, IX, and X, includes very steep slopes in hard rocks and moderate to very steep slopes in weak rocks.
Source: CGS Susceptibility to Deep-Seated Landslides in California
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 372 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 329 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-10
A.2.2.8. Sea-Level Rise
GIS layer composite from NOAA sea-level rise data. Zero to 10 feet of rise were classified based on Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) Scenarios where low rise is zero to one feet, intermediate-low is two feet, intermediate is three feet, intermediate-high is four to five feet, high is six to seven feet, and extreme is greater than or equal to eight feet.
Sea Level Rise
Hazard Native Class Description
Low 0 - 1'
Sea level rise from 0 to 1 foot above Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) [98% probability by year 2100]
Intermediate Low 1 - 2' Sea level rise from 1 foot to 2 feet above MHHW [73% probability by year 2100] Intermediate 2 - 3' Sea level rise from 2 feet to 3 feet above MHHW [3% probability by year 2100] Intermediate High 3 - 5' Sea level rise from 3 feet to 5 feet above MHHW [0.5% probability by year 2100] High 5 - 7' Sea level rise from 5 feet to 7 feet above MHHW [0.1% probability by year 2100] Extreme > 7'
Sea level rise greater than or equal to 8 feet above MHHW [0.05% probability by year 2100]
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office for Coastal Management Sea Level Rise Data: 1-10 ft Sea Level Rise Inundation Extent
Note: These data depict the potential inundation of coastal areas resulting from a projected 1 to 10 feet rise in sea level above current Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) conditions.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 373 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 330 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-11
A.2.2.9. Tsunami Run-up
GIS layer obtained from CGS / Cal OES MOST Model that outlines 10-foot tsunami run-up inundation area.
Tsunami Run-up
Hazard Native Class Description
Tsunami Run-up Maximum Wave
Elevation
A consortium of tsunami modelers, geologic hazard mapping specialists, and emergency planning scientists is producing maximum tsunami inundation maps for California, covering most residentially and transient populated areas along the state’s coastline. The new tsunami inundation maps will be an upgrade over the existing maps for the state, improving on the resolution, accuracy, and coverage of the maximum anticipated tsunami inundation line. Thirty-three separate map areas covering nearly one-half of California’s coastline were selected for tsunami modeling using the MOST (Method of Splitting Tsunami) model. Based on a preliminary evaluation of over fifty local and distant tsunami source scenarios, those with the maximum expected hazard for a particular area were input to MOST. The MOST model was run with a near-shore bathymetric grid resolution varying from three arc-seconds (90m) and one arc-seconds (30m), depending on availability.
Maximum tsunami "flow depth" and inundation layers were created by combining all modeled scenarios for each area.
Source: Cal OES / CGS
Note: Coordinated by Cal OES, these official maps are developed for all populated areas at risk to tsunamis in California and represent a combination of the maximum considered tsunamis for each area.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 374 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 331 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-12
A.2.2.10. Wildfire Hazard Severity
A proprietary Dynamic Planning + Science composite GIS layer derived from wildland urban interfaces, California Public Utilities Commission fire threat areas, and Fire Hazard Severity Zones. See Table 7-1.
Table 7-1: Wildfire Hazard Severity Classification
Hazard Native Class Description
Moderate
Tier 1 HHZs are zones in direct proximity to communities, roads, and utility lines, and are a direct threat to public safety.
1 WUI is the potential treatment zone in which projects could be conducted to reduce wildland fire threats to people.
1 / Moderate See Cal Fire FHSZ (State Responsibility Area [SRA] & Local Responsibility Area [LRA])
High
Tier 2
Tier 2 fire-threat areas depict areas where there is an elevated risk (including likelihood and potential impacts on people and property) from utility associated wildfires.
High See Cal Fire FHSZ (State Responsibility Area [SRA] & Local Responsibility Area [LRA])
Very High
Tier 3
Tier 3 fire-threat areas depict areas where there is an extreme risk (including likelihood and potential impacts on people and property) from utility associated wildfires.
Very High
Classification of a zone as moderate, high or very high fire hazard is based on a combination of how a fire will behave and the probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. Each area of the map gets a score for flame length, embers, and the likelihood of the area burning. Scores are then averaged over the zone areas. Final zone class (moderate, high and very high) is based on the averaged scores for the zone.
Source: Moderate - Cal Fire Tree Mortality, WUI, FHSZ; High - CPUC Utility Threat, Cal Fire FHSZ; Very High - High - CPUC Utility Threat, Cal Fire FHSZ (SRA & LRA)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 375 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 332 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-13
Methodology Overview
Figure 7-4: Data Analysis Methodology
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 376 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 333 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-14
Real Property Damage Estimations
The following tables provide detailed real property asset damage estimations for a 100-YR and 500-YR flood events (Table 7-2 and Table 7-3) and for both the M6.8 Concord Green Valley Earthquake Scenario (Table 7-4 and the M7.1 Hayward Rodger’s Creek Earthquake Scenario (Table 7-5).
Note that these damage estimation tables only show improved assets with some measure of damage estimated for each hazard. Section A.2.5 shows all unincorporated insured assets received from a county- provided list; improved parcels were filtered out of this longer data set for Hazus estimated damage results as shown herein for all jurisdictions. Jurisdictions may access the insured asset rolls through mitigatehazards.com/solanoHMP as well.
Table 7-2: 100-YR Flood Damage Estimations for Improved Assets Value Damage Pct. Estimated Losses (USD)
Building/Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Structure Content Structure Content Total Loss Pct. of Value Benicia 7 $5,440,508 $3,804,627 11% 66% $811,226 $2,312,079 $3,123,306 34% Blower Building 1 $753,535 $1,041,426 5% 35% $41,309 $360,956 $402,265 22% Chem. Storage Facility (Odor Scrubber) 1 $197,728 $383,133 6% 40% $11,982 $154,194 $166,176 29% Disinfection Station (Chem Storage Area) 1 $168,793 $193,888 14% 82% $23,511 $159,681 $183,192 51% Emerg. Gen. Bldg. (Natural Gas) 1 $34,963 $495,751 10% 66% $3,635 $328,152 $331,787 63% Equip. Bldg. (Secondary Area) 1 $1,467,285 $1,674,174 13% 78% $196,588 $1,298,870 $1,495,458 48% Industrial Monitoring Station 1 $147,091 $16,254 9% 63% $13,683 $10,225 $23,908 15% Ship Service Facility 1 $2,671,113 $1 19% 100% $520,518 $1 $520,519 19% Dixon 4 $903,600 $1,473,200 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Wastewater Treatment Plant 4 $903,600 $1,473,200 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Fairfield 4 $12,902,000 $933,132 1% 3% $588 $90 $679 0% Octo Inn Park 1 $404,000 $9,800 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Paradise Valley Golf Course 2 $52,000 $1,332 1% 7% $588 $90 $679 1% Training Facility 1 $12,446,000 $922,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Rio Vista 2 $449,400 $164,600 5% 30% $22,470 $49,380 $71,850 12% Corporation Yard 2 $449,400 $164,600 5% 30% $22,470 $49,380 $71,850 12% Suisun City 15 $5,433,262 $137,328 11% 66% $700,001 $105,524 $805,525 14% 4-Plex 13 $5,329,794 $137,326 13% 76% $699,632 $105,524 $805,156 15% Park Restroom 1 $66,212 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Restroom Bldg 1 $37,256 $1 1% 6% $369 $0 $369 1%
Unincorporated County 6 $53,401,751 $53,401,751 1% 4% $53,252 $319,509 $372,761 0% 2009 H&Ss New Lab 1 $7,556,000 $7,556,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Courts 1 $805,000 $805,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 377 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 334 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-15
Value Damage Pct. Estimated Losses (USD)
Building/Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Structure Content Structure Content Total Loss Pct. of Value Health & Social Services Headquarters Bldg. 1 $30,045,000 $30,045,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Health & Social Services Health Facility 1 $13,498,000 $13,498,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport 1 $1 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Veteran's Memorial Building 1 $1,497,750 $1,497,750 4% 21% $53,252 $319,509 $372,761 12% Vacaville 1 $80,000 $1 3% 16% $2,164 $0 $2,164 3%
Pena Adobe 1 $80,000 $1 3% 16% $2,164 $0 $2,164 3%
Vallejo 7 $5,026,610 $875,173 4% 12% $187,673 $173,670 $361,343 6% Fire Station 23 2 $1,357,507 $339,994 8% 12% $107,441 $39,638 $147,079 9% Mare Island 1 $1,214,392 $290,743 7% 46% $80,232 $132,381 $212,613 14% Marina Properties 4 $2,454,711 $244,436 1% 4% $0 $1,651 $1,651 0% Grand Total 46 $83,637,131 $60,789,812 6% 36% $1,777,374 $2,960,253 $4,737,626 3%
Table 7-3: 500-YR Flood Damage Estimations for Improved Assets Value
Damage
Pct. Estimated Losses (USD)
Building/Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Structure Content Structure Content Total Loss Pct. of Value Benicia 1 $153,657 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Grand Stand 1 $153,657 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Fairfield 6 $2,735,000 $150,909 1% 5% $12,178 $15,134 $27,312 1% Community Resources Apartments 1 $1,133,000 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Heather House 4 $1,356,000 $99,957 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Laurel Creek Park 1 $246,000 $50,951 5% 30% $12,178 $15,134 $27,312 9% Suisun City 1 $16,691 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Bus Shelter 1 $16,691 $1 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Unincorporated County 15 $121,786,251 $122,918,126 4% 24% $2,035,426 $12,058,289 $14,093,715 6% Ag Office Space 1 $517,750 $517,750 13% 77% $68,927 $397,712 $466,640 45% Ag Office Space/Warehouse (Bldg A) 1 $1,526,750 $1,526,750 13% 76% $202,193 $1,163,232 $1,365,425 45% Bay Area Community Services (Bacs) 1 $1,791,000 $1,791,000 2% 11% $34,140 $204,842 $238,983 7% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 378 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 335 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-16
Value
Damage
Pct. Estimated Losses (USD)
Building/Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Structure Content Structure Content Total Loss Pct. of Value Facilities Warehouse (Shared With Sheriff) 1 $1,340,000 $1,340,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Fleet Operations- Light Equipment
Shop 1 $878,500 $878,500 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Gen Serv Surplus (Bldg B) 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 13% 75% $261,253 $1,491,276 $1,752,529 44% Hall Of Justice 1 $27,787,000 $27,787,000 4% 22% $1,005,825 $6,034,953 $7,040,778 13% Jail 1 $54,594,750 $54,594,750 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Law And Justice 1 $8,479,000 $8,479,000 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Probation Building 1 $10,951,750 $10,951,750 1% 5% $83,704 $502,222 $585,926 3% Sheriff/Coroner 1 $1,638,750 $2,458,125 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Sheriff's Office 1 $625,000 $937,500 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Weights & Measures 1 $429,250 $429,250 13% 77% $57,442 $332,398 $389,840 45% William J. Carroll Govt. Center Site 2 $9,226,751 $9,226,751 2% 10% $321,942 $1,931,652 $2,253,594 12% Vacaville 14 $5,444,000 $627,744 3% 12% $19,496 $20,286 $39,782 1% Al Patch Park 1 $250,000 $16,800 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Arlington Park 4 $368,000 $89,440 3% 15% $10,811 $19,574 $30,385 7% Gentry Meadowlands 2 $176,000 $49,416 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Keating Park 2 $375,000 $136,099 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0%
Leisure Town Lift Station 1 $323,000 $28,588 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Transit Plaza 2 $205,000 $2,143 15% 54% $8,685 $713 $9,397 5% Vacaville Fire Station 75 1 $3,640,000 $229,500 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Water Treatment Plant 1 $107,000 $75,758 0% 0% $0 $0 $0 0% Vallejo 1 $1,439,433 $12,048 5% 28% $67,209 $3,375 $70,585 5% Community Center 1 $1,439,433 $12,048 5% 28% $67,209 $3,375 $70,585 5% Grand Total 38 $131,575,032 $123,708,829 3% 16% $2,134,310 $12,097,084 $14,231,395 6%
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 379 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 336 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-17
Table 7-4. EQ M6.8 Concord Green Valley Damage Estimations for Improved Assets
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Benicia 74 $73,452,515 $19,977,929 $93,430,444 48% 25% 9% $17,344,529 19% Barn 1 $52,488 $1 $52,489 45% 14% 2% $4,997 10%
Blower Building 1 $753,535 $1,041,426 $1,794,961 30% 9% 1% $46,681 3% Camel Barn 1 $1,143,507 $1 $1,143,508 54% 37% 12% $245,820 21% Camel Barn - Office 1 $603,137 $1 $603,138 54% 37% 12% $129,656 21% Caretaker House 1 $311,070 $1 $311,071 45% 14% 2% $29,614 10% Chem. Storage Facility (Odor Scrubber) 1 $197,728 $383,133 $580,861 62% 30% 5% $33,604 6% Chemical Building 1 $2,883,103 $562,213 $3,445,316 46% 19% 3% $324,868 9% Chlorine Room 1 $395,443 $1 $395,444 73% 57% 20% $131,034 33% City Hall 1 $6,423,835 $2,008,928 $8,432,763 72% 58% 27% $2,317,206 27% Civic Center Park - Restroom 1 $85,585 $1 $85,586 61% 29% 4% $14,132 17% Commandants Hse 1 $2,418,037 $1 $2,418,038 95% 91% 71% $1,749,643 72% Community Center And Portables 1 $853,630 $1 $853,631 43% 6% 0% $52,660 6% Concession 2 $444,537 $2 $444,539 27% 8% 1% $24,757 6%
Convention Center 1 $6,301,089 $406,054 $6,707,143 86% 76% 46% $3,281,859 49% Digester 1 And 2 Equipment Building 1 $289,358 $514,328 $803,686 62% 46% 17% $78,008 10% Digester 3 1 $1,738,559 $1 $1,738,560 62% 30% 5% $295,468 17% Digester 3 Equipment Building 1 $311,061 $431,897 $742,958 30% 9% 1% $19,270 3% Digesters 1 1 $1,335,868 $1 $1,335,869 98% 95% 76% $1,015,968 76% Disinfection Station (Chem Storage Area) 1 $168,793 $193,888 $362,681 62% 30% 5% $28,686 8% Dwelling 1 $325,362 $1 $325,363 36% 10% 1% $22,486 7%
Emerg. Gen. Bldg. (Natural Gas) 1 $34,963 $495,751 $530,714 37% 5% 0% $1,790 0% Equip. Bldg. (Secondary Area) 1 $1,467,285 $1,674,174 $3,141,459 30% 9% 1% $90,898 3% Filter Control Room And Gallery 1 $1,746,764 $1 $1,746,765 46% 19% 3% $196,825 11% Fire Station 1 $3,904,970 $286,078 $4,191,048 33% 5% 0% $184,978 4% Fire Station #12 1 $993,098 $1,432,535 $2,425,633 27% 8% 1% $53,508 2% Flash Mix Room 1 $438,788 $1 $438,789 46% 19% 3% $49,443 11% Grand Stand 1 $153,657 $1 $153,658 32% 3% 0% $6,486 4%
Hockey Rink 1 $53,190 $1 $53,191 64% 40% 10% $12,052 23% Industrial Monitoring Station 1 $147,091 $16,254 $163,345 30% 9% 1% $9,112 6% Library 1 $8,111,579 $3,924,567 $12,036,146 35% 11% 1% $582,736 5% Museum 2 $1,694,909 $2 $1,694,911 82% 73% 49% $637,209 38% Operation Building 1 $2,302,808 $224,074 $2,526,882 30% 9% 1% $142,659 6% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 380 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 337 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-18
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Operations Building 1 $4,980,954 $1 $4,980,955 73% 57% 20% $1,650,489 33% Pier/Restroom 1 $181,242 $1 $181,243 43% 6% 0% $11,181 6% Plant Headworks (Rake System Included) 1 $277,302 $983,376 $1,260,678 98% 95% 76% $210,896 17% Police Station 1 $1,604,174 $331,347 $1,935,521 63% 45% 17% $427,384 22% Pool Dressing / Shower Building 1 $551,009 $114,747 $665,756 59% 42% 15% $136,479 20% Portable Office 2 $360,391 $77,597 $437,988 25% 6% 0% $18,261 4% Recreation Center 1 $1,304,698 $97,307 $1,402,005 33% 5% 0% $61,804 4% Restroom 6 $758,036 $6 $758,042 37% 18% 5% $88,692 12%
Restroom - Playground Area 1 $65,558 $1 $65,559 40% 5% 0% $3,755 6% Restroom / Canteen - Softball Fields 1 $65,558 $1 $65,559 33% 11% 1% $4,575 7% Restroom/Canteen 1 $1 $1 $2 34% 4% 0% $0 2%
Restroom/Canteen - Little League Fields 1 $181,242 $1 $181,243 40% 5% 0% $10,380 6% Scheduled Mobile & Contractors
Equipment 1 $1 $1,191,000 $1,191,001 67% 43% 12% $0 0%
School - Gymnasium 1 $4,538,935 $206,669 $4,745,604 59% 42% 15% $1,124,249 24% School - Storage - Wood Framed 2 $29,623 $15,755 $45,378 38% 8% 1% $2,142 5% Service Station 1 $396,487 $1 $396,488 64% 49% 21% $117,939 30% Sewer Lift Station 1 $20,715 $1 $20,716 41% 25% 7% $2,973 14% Ship Service Facility 1 $2,671,113 $1 $2,671,114 84% 56% 14% $834,856 31% Shop Building 2 $1,117,556 $363,577 $1,481,133 53% 22% 3% $207,940 14% Solar Inverter 1 $318,673 $1 $318,674 27% 6% 0% $14,649 5% Solar Panel Farm 1 $2,144,108 $1 $2,144,109 27% 6% 0% $98,565 5% Solid Dewatering Building 1 $509,993 $2,589,051 $3,099,044 30% 9% 1% $31,594 1% Southern Pacific Depot 1 $742,082 $1 $742,083 33% 7% 0% $40,058 5% Storage 2 $171,244 $2 $171,246 33% 8% 1% $10,619 6%
Storage Garage 1 $38,583 $1 $38,584 54% 10% 0% $3,388 9% Thickener Building 1 $229,075 $412,158 $641,233 30% 9% 1% $14,191 2% Utility Bldg. 2 $407,671 $2 $407,673 44% 15% 2% $40,733 10% Utility Bldg. - South Hampton Park 1 $34,596 $1 $34,597 43% 13% 2% $3,074 9% Youth Center 1 $1,290,107 $1 $1,290,108 59% 42% 15% $319,547 25% Misc 1 $376,961 $1 $376,962 46% 17% 2% $40,003 11%
Dixon 48 $23,946,000 $5,521,810 $29,467,810 12% 3% 0% $385,649 1% Annex Building 1 $443,700 $87,700 $531,400 12% 2% 0% $8,408 2% City Hall 1 $555,600 $1 $555,601 11% 2% 0% $9,234 2%
Family Services 1 $1,152,200 $1 $1,152,201 12% 2% 0% $21,834 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 381 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 338 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-19
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Fire Station #1 6 $5,993,300 $492,102 $6,485,402 16% 4% 0% $73,761 1% Hall Park 3 $383,000 $50,200 $433,200 8% 1% 0% $3,905 1% Modular Building 2 $732,000 $28,401 $760,401 10% 1% 0% $11,161 1% Police Station 1 $4,087,800 $786,200 $4,874,000 8% 1% 0% $38,793 1% Pool Complex 4 $1,398,500 $52,602 $1,451,102 6% 1% 0% $14,932 1% Public Works Yard 4 $1,088,800 $396,800 $1,485,600 20% 7% 1% $69,963 5% Pump Station 1 $1,157,500 $1 $1,157,501 25% 7% 1% $55,456 5% Restroom Building 2 $357,900 $2 $357,902 8% 1% 0% $3,756 1% School Lift/Pump Station 3 $2,900 $109,800 $112,700 20% 5% 0% $85 0% Senior/Multi-Use Center 1 $1,547,300 $117,700 $1,665,000 8% 0% 0% $13,848 1% Storage/Concession Bldg 1 $41,900 $5,100 $47,000 14% 6% 1% $1,551 3% Train Station 1 $481,300 $20,000 $501,300 9% 0% 0% $4,847 1% Wastewater Treatment Plant 6 $1,576,500 $1,860,500 $3,437,000 10% 2% 0% $21,522 1% Water Storage /Pumping Site - Fitzgerald 4 $633,200 $341,200 $974,400 10% 2% 0% $6,273 1% Water Well/Pumping Site- Valley Glen 1 $569,400 $182,100 $751,500 7% 1% 0% $6,110 1% Water Well/Storage - Parklane 1 $683,900 $410,800 $1,094,700 7% 1% 0% $6,928 1% Water Well/Storage - Watson Ranch 2 $852,900 $554,000 $1,406,900 7% 1% 0% $9,561 1% White House & Garage 2 $206,400 $26,600 $233,000 12% 2% 0% $3,721 2% Fairfield 90 $234,692,052 $29,566,829 $264,258,881 31% 10% 2% $23,661,568 9% Allan Witt Park 13 $13,400,000 $690,945 $14,090,945 30% 8% 1% $965,807 7% Anna Kyle Modular 1 $101,000 $30,434 $131,434 25% 2% 0% $3,229 2% B. Gale Wilson Neighborhood Center 1 $288,000 $52,708 $340,708 35% 4% 0% $13,827 4% Center For Creative Arts 1 $11,125,000 $620,000 $11,745,000 22% 6% 0% $464,914 4% Civic Center 6 $38,906,000 $18,309,644 $57,215,644 47% 31% 11% $10,940,991 19% Community Resources Apartments 1 $1,133,000 $1 $1,133,001 55% 19% 1% $134,442 12% Cordelia Community Park 2 $156,000 $2,392 $158,392 42% 8% 0% $10,639 7% Corporation Yard 3 $874,000 $165,000 $1,039,000 36% 8% 1% $63,149 6% Dunnell Property 2 $933,000 $25,001 $958,001 29% 5% 0% $43,538 5% Fairfield/Cordelia Library 1 $16,236,000 $204,200 $16,440,200 54% 24% 3% $2,275,638 14% Fairfield/Vacaville Train Station 1 $405,000 $1 $405,001 5% 1% 0% $2,766 1% Ff Police Department 1 $1,516,000 $318,000 $1,834,000 43% 27% 8% $236,041 13% Fire Station 3 $4,518,000 $658,226 $5,176,226 42% 22% 5% $625,625 12% Fire Station #35 1 $6,434,500 $482,805 $6,917,305 41% 12% 1% $518,428 7% Fire Station #37 1 $13,943,400 $1,207,990 $15,151,390 22% 6% 0% $586,738 4% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 382 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 339 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-20
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Fire Station #39 1 $3,014,400 $497,814 $3,512,214 19% 1% 0% $70,507 2% Fire Station #40 1 $3,527,500 $347,829 $3,875,329 31% 3% 0% $141,382 4% Fire Station #41 1 $4,934,250 $492,805 $5,427,055 22% 2% 0% $144,327 3% Gary Falati Park 1 $1 $1 $2 18% 3% 0% $0 1%
Heather House 4 $1,356,000 $99,957 $1,455,957 29% 4% 0% $52,898 4% Housing Division Office 1 $649,000 $201,400 $850,400 25% 12% 2% $44,268 5% Laurel Creek Park 3 $724,000 $80,049 $804,049 18% 3% 0% $20,224 3% Lee Bell Park 1 $36,000 $3,896 $39,896 22% 6% 0% $1,515 4% Mankas Neighborhood Center 1 $288,000 $52,708 $340,708 31% 3% 0% $11,543 3% Non-Profit 2 $460,000 $35,789 $495,789 30% 5% 0% $26,669 5% North Bay Regional Water Treatment
Plant 9 $50,485,000 $514,285 $50,999,285 13% 3% 0% $1,011,841 2% Octo Inn Park 1 $404,000 $9,800 $413,800 26% 7% 1% $20,341 5% Paradise Valley Golf Course 5 $5,123,000 $346,786 $5,469,786 24% 2% 0% $150,448 3% Rancho Solano Golf Course 6 $6,304,000 $546,483 $6,850,483 31% 7% 1% $367,339 5% Rockville Hills Park 1 $42,000 $709 $42,709 53% 23% 3% $5,668 13% Rolling Hills Pump Station 2 $1,371,000 $163,156 $1,534,156 34% 20% 5% $153,333 10% Senior Center 2 $6,270,000 $609,319 $6,879,319 26% 3% 0% $216,165 3% Television Equipment 1 $1 $500,000 $500,001 90% 73% 34% $0 0% Temp Operation Center 1 $368,000 $22,973 $390,973 31% 8% 1% $21,443 5% Training Facility 1 $12,446,000 $922,000 $13,368,000 30% 4% 0% $535,302 4% Transportation Center 2 $14,429,000 $893,494 $15,322,494 48% 21% 3% $2,233,350 15% Waterman Water Treatment Plant 5 $12,492,000 $458,229 $12,950,229 45% 17% 2% $1,547,231 12% Rio Vista 35 $20,214,100 $5,801,309 $26,015,409 11% 2% 0% $439,225 2% Airport 7 $6,395,200 $130,206 $6,525,406 19% 5% 0% $218,140 3% Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant 4 $436,700 $380,401 $817,101 9% 2% 0% $5,926 1% Bruning Park 3 $437,200 $103,600 $540,800 5% 1% 0% $2,990 1% City Hall 1 $2,213,300 $399,100 $2,612,400 11% 4% 1% $57,679 2% Commercial Rental Building 1 $420,100 $1 $420,101 6% 0% 0% $2,752 1% Corporation Yard 4 $535,400 $238,800 $774,200 10% 2% 0% $12,471 2% Egbert Park 1 $154,900 $12,500 $167,400 19% 4% 0% $5,175 3% Library 1 $954,500 $730,500 $1,685,000 5% 1% 0% $6,529 0% Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant 8 $5,272,700 $2,486,401 $7,759,101 10% 2% 0% $95,728 1% Police Station 1 $1,001,900 $437,600 $1,439,500 5% 0% 0% $6,072 0% Senior Center 1 $1,576,200 $128,200 $1,704,400 10% 1% 0% $19,419 1% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 383 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 340 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-21
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Storage Rental Building 1 $563,000 $39,100 $602,100 6% 0% 0% $3,603 1% Water Treatment Plant / Well #10 2 $253,000 $714,900 $967,900 8% 1% 0% $2,742 0% Suisun City 34 $22,547,883 $6,210,939 $28,758,822 27% 12% 2% $2,006,614 7% 4-Plex 13 $5,329,794 $137,326 $5,467,120 25% 12% 2% $361,680 7% Announcers Booth 1 $20,140 $2,892 $23,032 18% 8% 1% $898 4% Bus Shelter 1 $16,691 $1 $16,692 21% 3% 0% $522 3%
City Hall 1 $2,192,078 $1,286,557 $3,478,635 28% 6% 0% $106,820 3% Community Center 1 $5,297,891 $1 $5,297,892 50% 27% 6% $820,908 15% Concession Std 1 $241,016 $14,454 $255,470 18% 8% 1% $10,747 4% Corp Yrd/Mn Bld 1 $282,100 $550,763 $832,863 18% 8% 1% $12,579 2% Fire House New 1 $644,090 $625,934 $1,270,024 20% 9% 1% $33,061 3% Harbor Theatre 1 $2,990,659 $964,196 $3,954,855 25% 12% 2% $202,946 5% Lawler House 1 $858,202 $8,673 $866,875 25% 12% 2% $58,238 7% Park Restroom 1 $66,212 $1 $66,213 25% 12% 2% $4,493 7% Police Bldg 1 $1,580,614 $2,006,452 $3,587,066 28% 6% 0% $77,023 2% Restroom Bldg 1 $37,256 $1 $37,257 26% 12% 2% $2,661 7% Scheduled Mobile & Contractors
Equipment 1 $1 $363,595 $363,596 46% 24% 5% $0 0%
Snr Citizen Cnt 1 $908,101 $140,222 $1,048,323 23% 10% 2% $53,533 5% Storage 1 $134,091 $80,952 $215,043 15% 3% 0% $3,384 2% Train Station 1 $315,587 $28,914 $344,501 25% 12% 2% $21,416 6% Vacant Commercial Building - 701 2 $394,279 $2 $394,281 25% 12% 2% $26,756 7% Vacant Commercial Building - 711 1 $112,651 $1 $112,652 25% 12% 2% $7,644 7% Vacant Commercial Building - 713 1 $112,651 $1 $112,652 55% 32% 7% $20,132 18% Misc 1 $1,013,779 $1 $1,013,780 55% 32% 7% $181,172 18% Unincorporated County 81 $587,282,015 $589,069,265 $1,176,351,280 29% 8% 2% $26,171,059 2% 2009 H&Ss New Lab 1 $7,556,000 $7,556,000 $15,112,000 35% 5% 0% $394,348 3% Ag Office Space 1 $517,750 $517,750 $1,035,500 55% 11% 0% $46,468 4% Ag Office Space/Warehouse (Bldg A) 1 $1,526,750 $1,526,750 $3,053,500 50% 11% 1% $128,537 4% Ag/Uc-Coop/District Attorney 1 $3,870,000 $3,870,000 $7,740,000 55% 19% 1% $459,214 6% Animal Shelter - New Bldg 1 $3,094,500 $3,094,500 $6,189,000 8% 0% 0% $29,676 0% Animal Shelter - Shelter Building 1 $3,074,500 $3,074,500 $6,149,000 19% 2% 0% $74,956 1% Assessor/Recorders - (Old Office) 1 $2,125,000 $2,125,000 $4,250,000 55% 19% 1% $252,153 6% Bay Area Community Services (Bacs) 1 $1,791,000 $1,791,000 $3,582,000 55% 19% 1% $212,520 6% Cement Hill Communication Site 1 $306,250 $306,250 $612,500 19% 1% 0% $6,881 1% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 384 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 341 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-22
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Chevron/Carl's Junior 1 $1 $1 $2 26% 2% 0% $0 2% Child Start 1 $606,250 $606,250 $1,212,500 25% 6% 0% $26,414 2% Claybank Detention Facility 1 $22,813,750 $22,813,750 $45,627,500 17% 2% 0% $510,115 1% Cogeneration Plant 1 $2,954,250 $2,954,250 $5,908,500 25% 3% 0% $101,154 2% Communications & Grounds/Facilities
Operations/Sheriff 1 $1,822,500 $1,822,500 $3,645,000 25% 3% 0% $62,402 2% Corp Yard -Fleet Heavy Equipment Shop 1 $1,224,000 $1,224,000 $2,448,000 31% 8% 1% $70,270 3% Corp Yard -Transportation Paint Shop 1 $1,891,500 $1,891,500 $3,783,000 34% 8% 0% $110,709 3% Corp Yard -Transportation Survey, Soils
Lab, Mx 1 $480,000 $480,000 $960,000 31% 8% 1% $27,557 3% County Communication Transmitter
Building 1 $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 37% 10% 1% $9,008 4% County Events Center (Old Library) 1 $2,741,000 $2,741,000 $5,482,000 74% 41% 7% $619,329 11% Courts 1 $805,000 $805,000 $1,610,000 33% 4% 0% $36,016 2% Facilities Warehouse (Shared With
Sheriff) 2 $2,265,000 $2,265,000 $4,530,000 26% 3% 0% $78,812 2% Fairfield Government Center 1 $70,529,250 $70,529,250 $141,058,500 25% 3% 0% $2,414,922 2% Fairfield Government Center Garage 1 $89,803,750 $89,803,750 $179,607,500 25% 3% 0% $3,074,881 2% Fairfield Library 1 $8,921,000 $8,921,000 $17,842,000 25% 3% 0% $306,882 2% Fairfield Post Office 1 $3,528,250 $3,528,250 $7,056,500 25% 3% 0% $121,372 2% Fairgrounds Facilities 1 $43,803,750 $43,803,750 $87,607,500 46% 13% 1% $3,922,188 4% Family Justice Center 1 $2,345,750 $2,345,750 $4,691,500 25% 3% 0% $80,694 2% Fleet Operations- Light Equipment Shop 1 $878,500 $878,500 $1,757,000 31% 8% 1% $50,997 3% Fuller Bldg: Mx Equipment & Evidence
Storage 1 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 21% 3% 0% $22,650 2% Gen Serv Surplus (Bldg B) 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 50% 11% 1% $168,380 4% Hall Of Justice 1 $27,787,000 $27,787,000 $55,574,000 25% 3% 0% $951,427 2% Hall Of Justice/Law Library 1 $712,500 $712,500 $1,425,000 42% 14% 2% $65,051 5% Health & Social Services Headquarters
Bldg. 1 $30,045,000 $30,045,000 $60,090,000 35% 5% 0% $1,568,049 3% Health & Social Services Health Facility 1 $13,498,000 $13,498,000 $26,996,000 35% 5% 0% $704,461 3% Jail 1 $54,594,750 $54,594,750 $109,189,500 25% 3% 0% $1,869,324 2% Justice Building 1 $17,619,750 $17,619,750 $35,239,500 40% 10% 0% $1,265,979 4% Juvenile Hall 1 $14,353,000 $14,353,000 $28,706,000 29% 4% 0% $584,024 2% Law And Justice 1 $8,479,000 $8,479,000 $16,958,000 25% 3% 0% $290,321 2% Library 1 $2,287,250 $2,287,250 $4,574,500 25% 3% 0% $78,681 2% Maintenance 1 $818,250 $818,250 $1,636,500 21% 3% 0% $24,711 2% Marriott Hotel Site 1 $1 $1 $2 26% 2% 0% $0 2%
New Foundations (Probation) 1 $2,177,750 $2,177,750 $4,355,500 29% 4% 0% $88,613 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 385 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 342 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-23
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. New H&Ss Building 1 $15,366,500 $15,366,500 $30,733,000 19% 2% 0% $384,777 1% New Veteran's Memorial Building 1 $1,870,500 $1,870,500 $3,741,000 8% 1% 0% $17,452 0% Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport 9 $9 $9 $18 16% 2% 0% $0 1%
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - Northeast
Hangars 1 $1 $1 $2 16% 2% 0% $0 1%
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - Southeast
Hangars 2 $2 $2 $4 16% 2% 0% $0 1%
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport Administration
Bldg 1 $1,907,500 $1,907,500 $3,815,000 13% 1% 0% $31,149 1% Office Of Emergency Services 1 $1,310,750 $1,966,125 $3,276,875 93% 84% 54% $776,161 24% Office Space: Hertz 1 $2,618,750 $2,618,750 $5,237,500 13% 1% 0% $42,764 1% Portable Building 1 $540,000 $540,000 $1,080,000 21% 2% 0% $13,797 1% Probation - Challenge Building 1 $1,980,500 $1,980,500 $3,961,000 29% 4% 0% $80,587 2% Probation - Juvenile Detention Facility 1 $13,195,000 $13,195,000 $26,390,000 29% 4% 0% $536,905 2% Probation Building 1 $10,951,750 $10,951,750 $21,903,500 25% 3% 0% $374,988 2% Shed (For Groundskeeping) 1 $180,000 $180,000 $360,000 32% 3% 0% $7,618 2% Sheriff/Coroner 1 $1,638,750 $2,458,125 $4,096,875 93% 84% 54% $970,386 24% Sheriff's Office 1 $625,000 $937,500 $1,562,500 53% 22% 3% $81,581 5% Social Services Building 1 $15,166,500 $15,166,500 $30,333,000 21% 4% 0% $530,979 2% Stanton Correctional Facility 1 $31,950,000 $31,950,000 $63,900,000 7% 0% 0% $268,700 0% Training: Classrooms 1 $2,485,000 $2,485,000 $4,970,000 8% 0% 0% $23,831 0% Training: Shop Bays 1 $7,350,000 $7,350,000 $14,700,000 8% 0% 0% $70,487 0% Transportation 1 $925,000 $925,000 $1,850,000 9% 0% 0% $9,232 0% Veteran's Memorial Building 5 $8,019,250 $8,019,250 $16,038,500 42% 16% 2% $908,615 6% Warehouse-Food & Drygoods 1 $3,022,750 $3,022,750 $6,045,500 7% 0% 0% $25,421 0% Weights & Measures 1 $429,250 $429,250 $858,500 56% 18% 2% $49,480 6% William J. Carroll Govt. Center Site 2 $9,226,751 $9,226,751 $18,453,502 11% 1% 0% $56,006 0% Vacaville 117 $118,265,001 $15,679,949 $133,944,950 17% 4% 0% $3,424,308 3% Al Patch Park 2 $253,000 $18,800 $271,800 15% 2% 0% $5,466 2% Andrew Park 1 $139,000 $2,655 $141,655 13% 3% 0% $3,071 2% Arlington Park 4 $368,000 $89,440 $457,440 15% 1% 0% $6,956 2% Art League Studio/Gallery 1 $353,000 $96,382 $449,382 20% 4% 0% $11,910 3% Buck/Eldridge Office Complex 5 $3,163,000 $620,563 $3,783,563 19% 1% 0% $72,713 2% Centennial Park 1 $149,000 $3,267 $152,267 12% 3% 0% $2,981 2% City Hall Complex 4 $15,161,000 $2,568,372 $17,729,372 15% 3% 0% $334,555 2% Cooper School Park 1 $189,000 $64,221 $253,221 14% 1% 0% $3,100 1% Corporation Yard 16 $5,371,000 $1,239,801 $6,610,801 20% 4% 0% $335,948 5% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 386 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 343 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-24
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Easterly Wastewater Treatment 20 $24,054,000 $3,825,133 $27,879,133 18% 7% 1% $920,128 3% Easterly Wastewater Treatment Plant 1 $3,765,000 $1 $3,765,001 17% 3% 0% $105,608 3% Fire Station No. 4 2 $940,000 $252,500 $1,192,500 26% 7% 1% $20,730 2% Fire Station No. 71 2 $1,833,000 $320,880 $2,153,880 18% 1% 0% $41,102 2% Fire Station No. 72 1 $790,000 $229,500 $1,019,500 15% 1% 0% $13,817 1% Fire Station No. 73 2 $844,000 $740,000 $1,584,000 23% 6% 0% $14,775 1% Gentry Meadowlands 2 $176,000 $49,416 $225,416 14% 1% 0% $2,927 1% Harbison Event Center 4 $2,034,000 $4 $2,034,004 19% 4% 0% $50,152 2% Horse Creek Lift Station 1 $313,000 $122,112 $435,112 11% 2% 0% $5,947 1% Keating Park 6 $876,000 $195,929 $1,071,929 16% 2% 0% $18,829 2% Lagoon Valley Park 3 $237,000 $64,018 $301,018 20% 1% 0% $5,671 2% Leisure Town Lift Station 1 $323,000 $28,588 $351,588 11% 2% 0% $5,743 2% Nelson Park 1 $122,000 $2,859 $124,859 15% 1% 0% $2,168 2% Old City Hall 1 $635,000 $153,865 $788,865 38% 13% 1% $52,019 7% Pena Adobe 6 $477,000 $56,053 $533,053 16% 2% 0% $10,778 2% Police Department Headquarters 1 $14,827,000 $1,435,118 $16,262,118 13% 3% 0% $327,528 2% Senior Center 1 $4,546,000 $138,856 $4,684,856 13% 3% 0% $100,421 2% Sport Center 2 $2,816,000 $123,541 $2,939,541 15% 2% 0% $62,189 2% Three Oak Community Center 5 $4,893,000 $107,411 $5,000,411 14% 3% 0% $113,270 2% Transit Plaza 2 $205,000 $2,143 $207,143 13% 3% 0% $4,528 2% Transmitter Property - Leased 1 $1 $662,594 $662,595 20% 3% 0% $0 0% Trower Center 2 $408,000 $35,601 $443,601 16% 1% 0% $7,585 2% Ulatis Cultural Center 2 $8,010,000 $642,006 $8,652,006 13% 1% 0% $132,886 2% Vaca Boys And Girls Center 3 $1,129,000 $192,867 $1,321,867 16% 1% 0% $21,349 2% Vaca Valley Lift Station 1 $318,000 $28,588 $346,588 11% 2% 0% $5,565 2% Vacaville Fire Station 75 1 $3,640,000 $229,500 $3,869,500 4% 0% 0% $18,236 0% Vacaville Museum 1 $2,348,000 $1 $2,348,001 13% 3% 0% $51,867 2% Vacaville Transportation Center 2 $384,000 $2,101 $386,101 21% 4% 0% $13,075 3% Water Treatment Plant 4 $12,167,000 $912,263 $13,079,263 23% 10% 2% $518,476 4% Wykoff Reservoir 1 $9,000 $423,000 $432,000 15% 4% 0% $238 0% Vallejo 129 $300,302,350 $36,211,422 $336,513,772 29% 10% 2% $28,383,986 8% Apn-0056-194-150 1 $124,136 $1 $124,137 20% 3% 0% $3,686 3% Bi-Bett Resident House 1 $450,083 $1 $450,084 20% 4% 0% $15,240 3% Bi-Bett Shelter 1 $491,565 $1 $491,566 19% 1% 0% $11,291 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 387 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 344 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-25
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Bi-Bett/Louisiana House 1 $418,971 $1 $418,972 23% 5% 0% $16,139 4% Blue Rock Springs Golf Course/Vallejo
Golf Club, I 18 $5,524,636 $1,372,454 $6,897,090 34% 8% 1% $274,962 4% City Hall 1 $25,732,460 $2,754,877 $28,487,337 42% 15% 2% $2,376,650 8% Community Center 1 $1,439,433 $12,048 $1,451,481 40% 10% 0% $103,423 7% Corporation Yard Storage 1 $950,980 $388,828 $1,339,808 40% 10% 0% $68,328 5% Corporation Yard/Police Station 7 $15,595,243 $2,748,842 $18,344,085 32% 15% 4% $2,722,063 15% Cunningham 3 $1,132,465 $217,530 $1,349,995 33% 14% 3% $46,250 3% Dos Reis Water Facilities 5 $4,918,757 $123,243 $5,042,000 24% 9% 1% $169,736 3% Ferry Building 1 $3,258,428 $21,323 $3,279,751 15% 3% 0% $85,012 3% Fire Prevention 3 $981,057 $103,317 $1,084,374 42% 23% 5% $144,394 13% Fire Station 21 1 $3,490,729 $898,531 $4,389,260 35% 8% 0% $208,955 5% Fire Station 22 2 $1,098,243 $275,985 $1,374,228 32% 12% 2% $28,697 2% Fire Station 23 2 $1,357,507 $339,994 $1,697,501 37% 14% 2% $73,577 4% Fire Station 24 1 $1,650,993 $366,180 $2,017,173 43% 12% 1% $135,431 7% Fire Station 25 1 $1,031,871 $224,334 $1,256,205 28% 7% 1% $52,213 4% Fire Station 26 1 $1,238,244 $297,324 $1,535,568 33% 7% 0% $67,261 4% Fire Station 27 1 $2,270,115 $523,774 $2,793,889 55% 24% 3% $314,366 11% Fire Station 28 1 $4,438,598 $827,450 $5,266,048 14% 3% 0% $102,709 2% Flemming Hill Water Treatment 11 $69,677,686 $5,895,422 $75,573,108 23% 8% 1% $3,494,741 5% Florence Douglas Center 1 $2,380,043 $205,569 $2,585,612 19% 2% 0% $59,596 2% Georgia Water Facility 5 $3,607,918 $81,499 $3,689,417 24% 8% 1% $113,314 3% J F Kennedy Library 1 $25,833,050 $1,857,635 $27,690,685 60% 41% 13% $6,058,625 22% Kaiser 2 $1,144,911 $177,893 $1,322,804 15% 2% 0% $23,999 2% Mare Island 8 $18,192,029 $3,701,659 $21,893,688 38% 16% 2% $1,477,954 7% Marina Properties 10 $5,013,128 $8,172,713 $13,185,841 28% 10% 2% $331,365 3% Native Son 1 $693,790 $1 $693,791 32% 9% 1% $43,910 6%
North Vallejo Community Center 1 $1,036,019 $28,985 $1,065,004 21% 5% 0% $39,907 4% Office Building 1 $686,531 $12,613 $699,144 25% 6% 0% $29,912 4% Pennsylvania House 2 $1,269,357 $69,515 $1,338,872 20% 4% 0% $42,980 3% Police Sub Station 1 $629,493 $69,301 $698,794 23% 5% 0% $24,248 3% Police Traffic Division 1 $680,308 $114,690 $794,998 27% 6% 1% $32,145 4% Satellite Cm Office 1 $356,892 $1 $356,893 31% 8% 1% $20,243 6% Sludge Dewatering Facilities 6 $4,815,051 $788,600 $5,603,651 23% 8% 1% $167,140 3% South Vallejo Community Center 1 $2,696,344 $19,601 $2,715,945 14% 3% 0% $65,198 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 388 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 345 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-26
Probability
Damage Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Swanzy 8 $23,307,827 $220,058 $23,527,885 27% 10% 2% $3,511,364 15% Transit Center 4 $8,118,072 $1,437,567 $9,555,639 34% 13% 2% $659,982 7% Travis Afb Water Treatment Plant 8 $14,014,769 $764,978 $14,779,747 20% 5% 0% $829,246 6% Vallejo Naval Museum 1 $9,062,828 $1,097,083 $10,159,911 71% 54% 22% $2,958,107 29% Vallejo Transit Center 1 $29,491,790 $1 $29,491,791 27% 6% 0% $1,379,626 5% Grand Total 608 $1,380,701,916 $708,039,452 $2,088,741,368 27% 9% 2% $101,816,937 5%
Table 7-5: EQ M7.1 Hayward Rodger’s Creek Flood Damage Estimations for Improved Assets Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Benicia 74 $73,452,515 $19,977,929 $93,430,444 18% 6% 1% $3,933,703 4% Barn 1 $52,488 $1 $52,489 14% 2% 0% $1,134 2%
Blower Building 1 $753,535 $1,041,426 $1,794,961 11% 2% 0% $13,760 1% Camel Barn 1 $1,143,507 $1 $1,143,508 16% 8% 1% $49,651 4% Camel Barn - Office 1 $603,137 $1 $603,138 16% 8% 1% $26,188 4% Caretaker House 1 $311,070 $1 $311,071 14% 2% 0% $6,722 2% Chem. Storage Facility (Odor Scrubber) 1 $197,728 $383,133 $580,861 34% 11% 1% $13,995 2% Chemical Building 1 $2,883,103 $562,213 $3,445,316 9% 2% 0% $41,603 1% Chlorine Room 1 $395,443 $1 $395,444 22% 10% 1% $21,749 5% City Hall 1 $6,423,835 $2,008,928 $8,432,763 37% 23% 6% $846,148 10% Civic Center Park - Restroom 1 $85,585 $1 $85,586 34% 11% 1% $6,058 7% Commandants Hse 1 $2,418,037 $1 $2,418,038 24% 13% 3% $183,843 8% Community Center And Portables 1 $853,630 $1 $853,631 14% 1% 0% $14,059 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 389 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 346 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-27
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Concession 2 $444,537 $2 $444,539 10% 2% 0% $6,737 2% Convention Center 1 $6,301,089 $406,054 $6,707,143 24% 13% 3% $479,072 7% Digester 1 And 2 Equipment Building 1 $289,358 $514,328 $803,686 21% 11% 2% $17,483 2% Digester 3 1 $1,738,559 $1 $1,738,560 34% 11% 1% $123,055 7% Digester 3 Equipment Building 1 $311,061 $431,897 $742,958 11% 2% 0% $5,680 1% Digesters 1 1 $1,335,868 $1 $1,335,869 53% 34% 10% $261,135 20% Disinfection Station (Chem Storage Area) 1 $168,793 $193,888 $362,681 34% 11% 1% $11,947 3% Dwelling 1 $325,362 $1 $325,363 18% 3% 0% $9,390 3%
Emerg. Gen. Bldg. (Natural Gas) 1 $34,963 $495,751 $530,714 14% 1% 0% $576 0% Equip. Bldg. (Secondary Area) 1 $1,467,285 $1,674,174 $3,141,459 11% 2% 0% $26,793 1% Filter Control Room And Gallery 1 $1,746,764 $1 $1,746,765 9% 2% 0% $25,206 1% Fire Station 1 $3,904,970 $286,078 $4,191,048 13% 1% 0% $61,269 1% Fire Station #12 1 $993,098 $1,432,535 $2,425,633 9% 2% 0% $14,251 1% Flash Mix Room 1 $438,788 $1 $438,789 9% 2% 0% $6,332 1% Grand Stand 1 $153,657 $1 $153,658 14% 1% 0% $2,531 2%
Hockey Rink 1 $53,190 $1 $53,191 30% 13% 2% $4,117 8%
Industrial Monitoring Station 1 $147,091 $16,254 $163,345 11% 2% 0% $2,686 2% Library 1 $8,111,579 $3,924,567 $12,036,146 13% 3% 0% $180,239 1% Misc 1 $376,961 $1 $376,962 26% 7% 1% $18,841 5%
Museum 2 $1,694,909 $2 $1,694,911 28% 16% 4% $172,938 10% Operation Building 1 $2,302,808 $224,074 $2,526,882 11% 2% 0% $42,049 2% Operations Building 1 $4,980,954 $1 $4,980,955 22% 10% 1% $273,952 5% Pier/Restroom 1 $181,242 $1 $181,243 10% 0% 0% $2,151 1% Plant Headworks (Rake System Included) 1 $277,302 $983,376 $1,260,678 53% 34% 10% $54,207 4% Police Station 1 $1,604,174 $331,347 $1,935,521 25% 13% 3% $119,367 6% Pool Dressing / Shower Building 1 $551,009 $114,747 $665,756 21% 11% 2% $33,292 5% Portable Office 2 $360,391 $77,597 $437,988 8% 1% 0% $5,147 1% Recreation Center 1 $1,304,698 $97,307 $1,402,005 13% 1% 0% $20,471 1% Restroom 6 $758,036 $6 $758,042 17% 6% 1% $32,783 4%
Restroom - Playground Area 1 $65,558 $1 $65,559 11% 0% 0% $782 1% Restroom / Canteen - Softball Fields 1 $65,558 $1 $65,559 8% 2% 0% $848 1% Restroom/Canteen 1 $1 $1 $2 11% 1% 0% $0 1%
Restroom/Canteen - Little League Fields 1 $181,242 $1 $181,243 11% 0% 0% $2,162 1% Scheduled Mobile & Contractors Equipment 1 $1 $1,191,000 $1,191,001 35% 17% 3% $0 0% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 390 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 347 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-28
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. School - Gymnasium 1 $4,538,935 $206,669 $4,745,604 21% 11% 2% $274,242 6% School - Storage - Wood Framed 2 $29,623 $15,755 $45,378 16% 2% 0% $757 2% Service Station 1 $396,487 $1 $396,488 24% 13% 3% $30,058 8% Sewer Lift Station 1 $20,715 $1 $20,716 19% 9% 2% $1,096 5% Ship Service Facility 1 $2,671,113 $1 $2,671,114 39% 11% 1% $196,914 7% Shop Building 2 $1,117,556 $363,577 $1,481,133 22% 5% 0% $55,772 4% Solar Inverter 1 $318,673 $1 $318,674 5% 1% 0% $1,973 1% Solar Panel Farm 1 $2,144,108 $1 $2,144,109 5% 1% 0% $13,272 1% Solid Dewatering Building 1 $509,993 $2,589,051 $3,099,044 11% 2% 0% $9,312 0% Southern Pacific Depot 1 $742,082 $1 $742,083 15% 2% 0% $15,970 2% Storage 2 $171,244 $2 $171,246 12% 2% 0% $3,515 2%
Storage Garage 1 $38,583 $1 $38,584 11% 0% 0% $469 1%
Thickener Building 1 $229,075 $412,158 $641,233 11% 2% 0% $4,183 1% Utility Bldg. 2 $407,671 $2 $407,673 11% 2% 0% $5,066 1% Utility Bldg. - South Hampton Park 1 $34,596 $1 $34,597 14% 2% 0% $756 2% Youth Center 1 $1,290,107 $1 $1,290,108 21% 11% 2% $77,948 6% Dixon 48 $23,946,000 $5,521,810 $29,467,810 4% 1% 0% $116,756 0% Annex Building 1 $443,700 $87,700 $531,400 5% 1% 0% $2,853 1% City Hall 1 $555,600 $1 $555,601 3% 0% 0% $2,000 0%
Family Services 1 $1,152,200 $1 $1,152,201 5% 1% 0% $7,409 1% Fire Station #1 6 $5,993,300 $492,102 $6,485,402 6% 1% 0% $20,372 0% Hall Park 3 $383,000 $50,200 $433,200 2% 0% 0% $1,086 0% Modular Building 2 $732,000 $28,401 $760,401 3% 0% 0% $2,516 0% Police Station 1 $4,087,800 $786,200 $4,874,000 2% 0% 0% $10,547 0% Pool Complex 4 $1,398,500 $52,602 $1,451,102 2% 0% 0% $3,816 0% Public Works Yard 4 $1,088,800 $396,800 $1,485,600 8% 2% 0% $24,037 2% Pump Station 1 $1,157,500 $1 $1,157,501 11% 2% 0% $20,187 2% Restroom Building 2 $357,900 $2 $357,902 2% 0% 0% $1,033 0% School Lift/Pump Station 3 $2,900 $109,800 $112,700 8% 1% 0% $28 0% Senior/Multi-Use Center 1 $1,547,300 $117,700 $1,665,000 2% 0% 0% $3,992 0% Storage/Concession Bldg 1 $41,900 $5,100 $47,000 6% 2% 0% $600 1% Train Station 1 $481,300 $20,000 $501,300 3% 0% 0% $1,324 0% Wastewater Treatment Plant 6 $1,576,500 $1,860,500 $3,437,000 3% 0% 0% $6,077 0% Water Storage /Pumping Site - Fitzgerald 4 $633,200 $341,200 $974,400 4% 1% 0% $1,673 0% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 391 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 348 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-29
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Water Well/Pumping Site- Valley Glen 1 $569,400 $182,100 $751,500 2% 0% 0% $1,611 0% Water Well/Storage - Parklane 1 $683,900 $410,800 $1,094,700 2% 0% 0% $1,853 0% Water Well/Storage - Watson Ranch 2 $852,900 $554,000 $1,406,900 2% 0% 0% $2,415 0% White House & Garage 2 $206,400 $26,600 $233,000 5% 1% 0% $1,327 1% Fairfield 90 $234,692,052 $29,566,829 $264,258,881 8% 2% 0% $4,631,417 2% Allan Witt Park 13 $13,400,000 $690,945 $14,090,945 6% 1% 0% $150,433 1% Anna Kyle Modular 1 $101,000 $30,434 $131,434 7% 0% 0% $791 1% B. Gale Wilson Neighborhood Center 1 $288,000 $52,708 $340,708 6% 0% 0% $1,970 1% Center For Creative Arts 1 $11,125,000 $620,000 $11,745,000 6% 1% 0% $96,565 1% Civic Center 6 $38,906,000 $18,309,644 $57,215,644 14% 7% 1% $2,269,087 4% Community Resources Apartments 1 $1,133,000 $1 $1,133,001 12% 1% 0% $17,686 2% Cordelia Community Park 2 $156,000 $2,392 $158,392 2% 0% 0% $426 0% Corporation Yard 3 $874,000 $165,000 $1,039,000 10% 1% 0% $14,394 1% Dunnell Property 2 $933,000 $25,001 $958,001 9% 1% 0% $10,725 1% Fairfield/Cordelia Library 1 $16,236,000 $204,200 $16,440,200 8% 1% 0% $207,171 1% Fairfield/Vacaville Train Station 1 $405,000 $1 $405,001 1% 0% 0% $292 0% Ff Police Department 1 $1,516,000 $318,000 $1,834,000 12% 5% 1% $47,542 3% Fire Station 3 $4,518,000 $658,226 $5,176,226 11% 4% 1% $124,344 2% Fire Station #35 1 $6,434,500 $482,805 $6,917,305 2% 0% 0% $15,893 0% Fire Station #37 1 $13,943,400 $1,207,990 $15,151,390 6% 1% 0% $127,303 1% Fire Station #39 1 $3,014,400 $497,814 $3,512,214 5% 0% 0% $15,313 0% Fire Station #40 1 $3,527,500 $347,829 $3,875,329 6% 0% 0% $21,906 1% Fire Station #41 1 $4,934,250 $492,805 $5,427,055 6% 0% 0% $35,872 1% Gary Falati Park 1 $1 $1 $2 5% 0% 0% $0 0%
Heather House 4 $1,356,000 $99,957 $1,455,957 8% 1% 0% $12,756 1% Housing Division Office 1 $649,000 $201,400 $850,400 8% 3% 0% $12,130 1% Laurel Creek Park 3 $724,000 $80,049 $804,049 5% 0% 0% $4,341 1% Lee Bell Park 1 $36,000 $3,896 $39,896 6% 1% 0% $312 1% Mankas Neighborhood Center 1 $288,000 $52,708 $340,708 6% 0% 0% $1,863 1% Non-Profit 2 $460,000 $35,789 $495,789 9% 1% 0% $7,304 1% North Bay Regional Water Treatment Plant 9 $50,485,000 $514,285 $50,999,285 3% 1% 0% $228,675 0% Octo Inn Park 1 $404,000 $9,800 $413,800 5% 1% 0% $2,727 1% Paradise Valley Golf Course 5 $5,123,000 $346,786 $5,469,786 6% 0% 0% $34,116 1% Rancho Solano Golf Course 6 $6,304,000 $546,483 $6,850,483 5% 1% 0% $34,277 1% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 392 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 349 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-30
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Rockville Hills Park 1 $42,000 $709 $42,709 5% 1% 0% $341 1% Rolling Hills Pump Station 2 $1,371,000 $163,156 $1,534,156 12% 5% 1% $40,472 3% Senior Center 2 $6,270,000 $609,319 $6,879,319 7% 0% 0% $51,327 1% Television Equipment 1 $1 $500,000 $500,001 28% 13% 2% $0 0% Temp Operation Center 1 $368,000 $22,973 $390,973 9% 1% 0% $4,795 1% Training Facility 1 $12,446,000 $922,000 $13,368,000 10% 1% 0% $144,498 1% Transportation Center 2 $14,429,000 $893,494 $15,322,494 15% 4% 0% $531,584 3% Waterman Water Treatment Plant 5 $12,492,000 $458,229 $12,950,229 14% 3% 0% $362,184 3% Rio Vista 35 $20,214,100 $5,801,309 $26,015,409 5% 1% 0% $202,630 1% Airport 7 $6,395,200 $130,206 $6,525,406 8% 1% 0% $78,341 1% Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant 4 $436,700 $380,401 $817,101 4% 1% 0% $2,218 0% Bruning Park 3 $437,200 $103,600 $540,800 4% 0% 0% $2,365 0% City Hall 1 $2,213,300 $399,100 $2,612,400 9% 4% 0% $48,626 2% Commercial Rental Building 1 $420,100 $1 $420,101 5% 0% 0% $2,206 1% Corporation Yard 4 $535,400 $238,800 $774,200 5% 1% 0% $6,696 1% Egbert Park 1 $154,900 $12,500 $167,400 10% 2% 0% $2,560 2% Library 1 $954,500 $730,500 $1,685,000 4% 1% 0% $5,164 0% Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant 8 $5,272,700 $2,486,401 $7,759,101 4% 1% 0% $32,737 0% Police Station 1 $1,001,900 $437,600 $1,439,500 2% 0% 0% $2,635 0% Senior Center 1 $1,576,200 $128,200 $1,704,400 8% 1% 0% $15,557 1% Storage Rental Building 1 $563,000 $39,100 $602,100 3% 0% 0% $1,582 0% Water Treatment Plant / Well #10 2 $253,000 $714,900 $967,900 4% 1% 0% $1,943 0% Suisun City 34 $22,547,883 $6,210,939 $28,758,822 12% 4% 1% $747,539 3% 4-Plex 13 $5,329,794 $137,326 $5,467,120 11% 4% 0% $136,549 2% Announcers Booth 1 $20,140 $2,892 $23,032 6% 2% 0% $245 1% Bus Shelter 1 $16,691 $1 $16,692 11% 1% 0% $233 1%
City Hall 1 $2,192,078 $1,286,557 $3,478,635 11% 2% 0% $35,994 1% Community Center 1 $5,297,891 $1 $5,297,892 23% 10% 1% $304,841 6% Concession Std 1 $241,016 $14,454 $255,470 6% 2% 0% $2,928 1% Corp Yrd/Mn Bld 1 $282,100 $550,763 $832,863 6% 2% 0% $3,428 0% Fire House New 1 $644,090 $625,934 $1,270,024 8% 3% 0% $11,098 1% Harbor Theatre 1 $2,990,659 $964,196 $3,954,855 11% 4% 0% $76,621 2% Lawler House 1 $858,202 $8,673 $866,875 11% 4% 0% $21,987 3% Misc 1 $1,013,779 $1 $1,013,780 29% 13% 2% $78,284 8%
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 393 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 350 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-31
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Park Restroom 1 $66,212 $1 $66,213 11% 4% 0% $1,696 3% Police Bldg 1 $1,580,614 $2,006,452 $3,587,066 11% 2% 0% $25,954 1% Restroom Bldg 1 $37,256 $1 $37,257 11% 4% 0% $954 3%
Scheduled Mobile & Contractors Equipment 1 $1 $363,595 $363,596 22% 9% 1% $0 0% Snr Citizen Cnt 1 $908,101 $140,222 $1,048,323 8% 3% 0% $16,273 2% Storage 1 $134,091 $80,952 $215,043 4% 1% 0% $683 0%
Train Station 1 $315,587 $28,914 $344,501 11% 4% 0% $8,085 2% Vacant Commercial Building - 701 2 $394,279 $2 $394,281 11% 4% 0% $10,101 3% Vacant Commercial Building - 711 1 $112,651 $1 $112,652 11% 4% 0% $2,886 3% Vacant Commercial Building - 713 1 $112,651 $1 $112,652 29% 13% 2% $8,699 8% Unincorporated County 81 $587,282,015 $589,069,265 $1,176,351,280 9% 1% 0% $6,934,903 1% 2009 H&Ss New Lab 1 $7,556,000 $7,556,000 $15,112,000 7% 0% 0% $67,022 0% Ag Office Space 1 $517,750 $517,750 $1,035,500 9% 0% 0% $5,348 1% Ag Office Space/Warehouse (Bldg A) 1 $1,526,750 $1,526,750 $3,053,500 8% 1% 0% $14,901 0% Ag/Uc-Coop/District Attorney 1 $3,870,000 $3,870,000 $7,740,000 12% 1% 0% $60,411 1% Animal Shelter - New Bldg 1 $3,094,500 $3,094,500 $6,189,000 1% 0% 0% $3,125 0% Animal Shelter - Shelter Building 1 $3,074,500 $3,074,500 $6,149,000 4% 0% 0% $15,649 0% Assessor/Recorders - (Old Office) 1 $2,125,000 $2,125,000 $4,250,000 12% 1% 0% $33,171 1% Bay Area Community Services (Bacs) 1 $1,791,000 $1,791,000 $3,582,000 12% 1% 0% $27,958 1% Cement Hill Communication Site 1 $306,250 $306,250 $612,500 3% 0% 0% $1,139 0% Chevron/Carl's Junior 1 $1 $1 $2 15% 1% 0% $0 1%
Child Start 1 $606,250 $606,250 $1,212,500 20% 4% 0% $20,285 2% Claybank Detention Facility 1 $22,813,750 $22,813,750 $45,627,500 4% 0% 0% $116,122 0% Cogeneration Plant 1 $2,954,250 $2,954,250 $5,908,500 7% 0% 0% $22,925 0% Communications & Grounds/Facilities
Operations/Sheriff 1 $1,822,500 $1,822,500 $3,645,000 7% 0% 0% $14,143 0% Corp Yard -Fleet Heavy Equipment Shop 1 $1,224,000 $1,224,000 $2,448,000 10% 2% 0% $18,470 1% Corp Yard -Transportation Paint Shop 1 $1,891,500 $1,891,500 $3,783,000 11% 1% 0% $27,275 1% Corp Yard -Transportation Survey, Soils Lab, Mx 1 $480,000 $480,000 $960,000 10% 2% 0% $7,243 1% County Communication Transmitter Building 1 $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 6% 1% 0% $1,134 0% County Events Center (Old Library) 1 $2,741,000 $2,741,000 $5,482,000 21% 3% 0% $86,424 2% Courts 1 $805,000 $805,000 $1,610,000 11% 0% 0% $9,877 1% Facilities Warehouse (Shared With Sheriff) 2 $2,265,000 $2,265,000 $4,530,000 7% 0% 0% $18,011 0% Fairfield Government Center 1 $70,529,250 $70,529,250 $141,058,500 7% 0% 0% $547,307 0% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 394 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 351 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-32
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Fairfield Government Center Garage 1 $89,803,750 $89,803,750 $179,607,500 7% 0% 0% $696,877 0% Fairfield Library 1 $8,921,000 $8,921,000 $17,842,000 7% 0% 0% $72,795 0% Fairfield Post Office 1 $3,528,250 $3,528,250 $7,056,500 7% 0% 0% $27,379 0% Fairgrounds Facilities 1 $43,803,750 $43,803,750 $87,607,500 21% 3% 0% $1,346,965 2% Family Justice Center 1 $2,345,750 $2,345,750 $4,691,500 7% 0% 0% $18,203 0% Fleet Operations- Light Equipment Shop 1 $878,500 $878,500 $1,757,000 11% 2% 0% $14,038 1% Fuller Bldg: Mx Equipment & Evidence Storage 1 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 6% 0% 0% $5,468 0% Gen Serv Surplus (Bldg B) 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 8% 1% 0% $19,520 0% Hall Of Justice 1 $27,787,000 $27,787,000 $55,574,000 7% 0% 0% $215,627 0% Hall Of Justice/Law Library 1 $712,500 $712,500 $1,425,000 18% 4% 0% $21,824 2% Health & Social Services Headquarters Bldg. 1 $30,045,000 $30,045,000 $60,090,000 7% 0% 0% $266,499 0% Health & Social Services Health Facility 1 $13,498,000 $13,498,000 $26,996,000 7% 0% 0% $119,727 0% Jail 1 $54,594,750 $54,594,750 $109,189,500 7% 0% 0% $423,655 0% Justice Building 1 $17,619,750 $17,619,750 $35,239,500 29% 6% 0% $823,547 2% Juvenile Hall 1 $14,353,000 $14,353,000 $28,706,000 7% 0% 0% $117,120 0% Law And Justice 1 $8,479,000 $8,479,000 $16,958,000 7% 0% 0% $65,797 0% Library 1 $2,287,250 $2,287,250 $4,574,500 7% 0% 0% $17,749 0% Maintenance 1 $818,250 $818,250 $1,636,500 6% 0% 0% $5,965 0% Marriott Hotel Site 1 $1 $1 $2 15% 1% 0% $0 1%
New Foundations (Probation) 1 $2,177,750 $2,177,750 $4,355,500 7% 0% 0% $17,770 0% New H&Ss Building 1 $15,366,500 $15,366,500 $30,733,000 15% 1% 0% $287,661 1% New Veteran's Memorial Building 1 $1,870,500 $1,870,500 $3,741,000 2% 0% 0% $4,826 0% Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport 9 $9 $9 $18 4% 0% 0% $0 0%
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - Northeast Hangars 1 $1 $1 $2 5% 0% 0% $0 0% Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - Southeast Hangars 2 $2 $2 $4 5% 0% 0% $0 0% Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport Administration Bldg 1 $1,907,500 $1,907,500 $3,815,000 4% 0% 0% $8,813 0% Office Of Emergency Services 1 $1,310,750 $1,966,125 $3,276,875 31% 17% 3% $123,525 4% Office Space: Hertz 1 $2,618,750 $2,618,750 $5,237,500 4% 0% 0% $12,099 0% Portable Building 1 $540,000 $540,000 $1,080,000 5% 0% 0% $2,911 0% Probation - Challenge Building 1 $1,980,500 $1,980,500 $3,961,000 7% 0% 0% $16,993 0% Probation - Juvenile Detention Facility 1 $13,195,000 $13,195,000 $26,390,000 7% 0% 0% $107,671 0% Probation Building 1 $10,951,750 $10,951,750 $21,903,500 7% 0% 0% $84,986 0% Shed (For Groundskeeping) 1 $180,000 $180,000 $360,000 8% 0% 0% $1,631 0% Sheriff/Coroner 1 $1,638,750 $2,458,125 $4,096,875 31% 17% 3% $154,436 4% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 395 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 352 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-33
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Sheriff's Office 1 $625,000 $937,500 $1,562,500 22% 6% 0% $25,125 2% Social Services Building 1 $15,166,500 $15,166,500 $30,333,000 17% 3% 0% $398,727 1% Stanton Correctional Facility 1 $31,950,000 $31,950,000 $63,900,000 1% 0% 0% $32,270 0% Training: Classrooms 1 $2,485,000 $2,485,000 $4,970,000 1% 0% 0% $2,510 0% Training: Shop Bays 1 $7,350,000 $7,350,000 $14,700,000 1% 0% 0% $7,424 0% Transportation 1 $925,000 $925,000 $1,850,000 1% 0% 0% $925 0% Veteran's Memorial Building 5 $8,019,250 $8,019,250 $16,038,500 18% 3% 0% $233,586 1% Warehouse-Food & Drygoods 1 $3,022,750 $3,022,750 $6,045,500 1% 0% 0% $3,053 0% Weights & Measures 1 $429,250 $429,250 $858,500 10% 1% 0% $5,821 1% William J. Carroll Govt. Center Site 2 $9,226,751 $9,226,751 $18,453,502 2% 0% 0% $5,444 0% Vacaville 117 $118,265,001 $15,679,949 $133,944,950 6% 1% 0% $966,449 1% Al Patch Park 2 $253,000 $18,800 $271,800 3% 0% 0% $1,045 0% Andrew Park 1 $139,000 $2,655 $141,655 4% 1% 0% $812 1% Arlington Park 4 $368,000 $89,440 $457,440 4% 0% 0% $1,565 0% Art League Studio/Gallery 1 $353,000 $96,382 $449,382 8% 1% 0% $4,120 1% Buck/Eldridge Office Complex 5 $3,163,000 $620,563 $3,783,563 4% 0% 0% $13,560 0% Centennial Park 1 $149,000 $3,267 $152,267 3% 0% 0% $568 0% City Hall Complex 4 $15,161,000 $2,568,372 $17,729,372 5% 1% 0% $91,038 1% Cooper School Park 1 $189,000 $64,221 $253,221 4% 0% 0% $915 0% Corporation Yard 16 $5,371,000 $1,239,801 $6,610,801 8% 1% 0% $122,148 2% Easterly Wastewater Treatment 20 $24,054,000 $3,825,133 $27,879,133 7% 2% 0% $294,226 1% Easterly Wastewater Treatment Plant 1 $3,765,000 $1 $3,765,001 5% 1% 0% $24,472 1% Fire Station No. 4 2 $940,000 $252,500 $1,192,500 8% 1% 0% $4,726 0% Fire Station No. 71 2 $1,833,000 $320,880 $2,153,880 4% 0% 0% $7,554 0% Fire Station No. 72 1 $790,000 $229,500 $1,019,500 5% 0% 0% $4,029 0% Fire Station No. 73 2 $844,000 $740,000 $1,584,000 7% 1% 0% $3,062 0% Gentry Meadowlands 2 $176,000 $49,416 $225,416 5% 0% 0% $887 0% Harbison Event Center 4 $2,034,000 $4 $2,034,004 7% 1% 0% $15,963 1% Horse Creek Lift Station 1 $313,000 $122,112 $435,112 4% 1% 0% $1,587 0% Keating Park 6 $876,000 $195,929 $1,071,929 4% 0% 0% $3,782 0% Lagoon Valley Park 3 $237,000 $64,018 $301,018 4% 0% 0% $971 0% Leisure Town Lift Station 1 $323,000 $28,588 $351,588 3% 0% 0% $1,554 0% Nelson Park 1 $122,000 $2,859 $124,859 5% 0% 0% $622 0% Old City Hall 1 $635,000 $153,865 $788,865 17% 4% 0% $18,840 2% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 396 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 353 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-34
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Pena Adobe 6 $477,000 $56,053 $533,053 5% 0% 0% $2,783 1% Police Department Headquarters 1 $14,827,000 $1,435,118 $16,262,118 4% 1% 0% $86,590 1% Senior Center 1 $4,546,000 $138,856 $4,684,856 4% 1% 0% $26,549 1% Sport Center 2 $2,816,000 $123,541 $2,939,541 5% 0% 0% $16,444 1% Three Oak Community Center 5 $4,893,000 $107,411 $5,000,411 3% 0% 0% $21,468 0% Transit Plaza 2 $205,000 $2,143 $207,143 4% 1% 0% $1,197 1% Transmitter Property - Leased 1 $1 $662,594 $662,595 4% 0% 0% $0 0% Trower Center 2 $408,000 $35,601 $443,601 3% 0% 0% $1,506 0% Ulatis Cultural Center 2 $8,010,000 $642,006 $8,652,006 4% 0% 0% $38,448 0% Vaca Boys And Girls Center 3 $1,129,000 $192,867 $1,321,867 4% 0% 0% $4,539 0% Vaca Valley Lift Station 1 $318,000 $28,588 $346,588 3% 0% 0% $1,472 0% Vacaville Fire Station 75 1 $3,640,000 $229,500 $3,869,500 1% 0% 0% $2,184 0% Vacaville Museum 1 $2,348,000 $1 $2,348,001 4% 1% 0% $13,712 1% Vacaville Transportation Center 2 $384,000 $2,101 $386,101 6% 1% 0% $3,195 1% Water Treatment Plant 4 $12,167,000 $912,263 $13,079,263 9% 3% 0% $128,274 1% Wykoff Reservoir 1 $9,000 $423,000 $432,000 3% 0% 0% $43 0% Vallejo 129 $300,302,350 $36,211,422 $336,513,772 22% 8% 1% $28,203,576 8% Apn-0056-194-150 1 $124,136 $1 $124,137 18% 2% 0% $3,115 3% Bi-Bett Resident House 1 $450,083 $1 $450,084 20% 4% 0% $14,943 3% Bi-Bett Shelter 1 $491,565 $1 $491,566 20% 1% 0% $11,847 2% Bi-Bett/Louisiana House 1 $418,971 $1 $418,972 20% 4% 0% $13,910 3% Blue Rock Springs Golf Course/Vallejo Golf Club 18 $5,524,636 $1,372,454 $6,897,090 14% 2% 0% $91,779 1% City Hall 1 $25,732,460 $2,754,877 $28,487,337 38% 13% 1% $2,076,352 7% Community Center 1 $1,439,433 $12,048 $1,451,481 29% 6% 0% $67,279 5% Corporation Yard Storage 1 $950,980 $388,828 $1,339,808 29% 6% 0% $44,449 3% Corporation Yard/Police Station 7 $15,595,243 $2,748,842 $18,344,085 26% 12% 3% $2,221,910 12% Cunningham 3 $1,132,465 $217,530 $1,349,995 19% 7% 1% $19,977 1% Dos Reis Water Facilities 5 $4,918,757 $123,243 $5,042,000 18% 6% 1% $109,112 2% Ferry Building 1 $3,258,428 $21,323 $3,279,751 13% 3% 0% $70,708 2% Fire Prevention 3 $981,057 $103,317 $1,084,374 37% 20% 4% $120,615 11% Fire Station 21 1 $3,490,729 $898,531 $4,389,260 29% 6% 0% $161,935 4% Fire Station 22 2 $1,098,243 $275,985 $1,374,228 28% 10% 2% $21,910 2% Fire Station 23 2 $1,357,507 $339,994 $1,697,501 34% 12% 2% $62,812 4% Fire Station 24 1 $1,650,993 $366,180 $2,017,173 27% 5% 0% $68,500 3% FINAL for adoption Packet Page 397 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 354 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-35
Probability
Damage
Exceeds
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total Slight Moderate Extensive Economic Loss Loss Pct. Fire Station 25 1 $1,031,871 $224,334 $1,256,205 19% 4% 0% $32,267 3% Fire Station 26 1 $1,238,244 $297,324 $1,535,568 20% 3% 0% $36,404 2% Fire Station 27 1 $2,270,115 $523,774 $2,793,889 33% 10% 1% $151,371 5% Fire Station 28 1 $4,438,598 $827,450 $5,266,048 16% 4% 0% $121,573 2% Flemming Hill Water Treatment 11 $69,677,686 $5,895,422 $75,573,108 15% 5% 1% $2,210,099 3% Florence Douglas Center 1 $2,380,043 $205,569 $2,585,612 15% 1% 0% $44,554 2% Georgia Water Facility 5 $3,607,918 $81,499 $3,689,417 19% 6% 1% $84,207 2% J F Kennedy Library 1 $25,833,050 $1,857,635 $27,690,685 60% 41% 13% $6,064,825 22% Kaiser 2 $1,144,911 $177,893 $1,322,804 15% 2% 0% $23,502 2% Mare Island 8 $18,192,029 $3,701,659 $21,893,688 44% 19% 3% $1,885,531 9% Marina Properties 10 $5,013,128 $8,172,713 $13,185,841 29% 11% 2% $363,681 3% Native Son 1 $693,790 $1 $693,791 33% 10% 1% $45,388 7% North Vallejo Community Center 1 $1,036,019 $28,985 $1,065,004 12% 3% 0% $21,653 2% Office Building 1 $686,531 $12,613 $699,144 20% 4% 0% $22,971 3% Pennsylvania House 2 $1,269,357 $69,515 $1,338,872 20% 4% 0% $42,143 3% Police Sub Station 1 $629,493 $69,301 $698,794 23% 5% 0% $25,180 4% Police Traffic Division 1 $680,308 $114,690 $794,998 19% 4% 0% $21,049 3% Satellite Cm Office 1 $356,892 $1 $356,893 17% 3% 0% $10,043 3% Sludge Dewatering Facilities 6 $4,815,051 $788,600 $5,603,651 17% 5% 1% $102,632 2% South Vallejo Community Center 1 $2,696,344 $19,601 $2,715,945 13% 3% 0% $60,290 2% Swanzy 8 $23,307,827 $220,058 $23,527,885 23% 10% 2% $6,089,900 26% Transit Center 4 $8,118,072 $1,437,567 $9,555,639 31% 11% 1% $601,327 6% Travis Afb Water Treatment Plant 8 $14,014,769 $764,978 $14,779,747 6% 1% 0% $239,464 2% Vallejo Naval Museum 1 $9,062,828 $1,097,083 $10,159,911 78% 63% 30% $3,583,986 35% Vallejo Transit Center 1 $29,491,790 $1 $29,491,791 23% 5% 0% $1,138,383 4% Grand Total 608 $1,380,701,916 $708,039,452 $2,088,741,368 12% 3% 1% $45,736,972 2%
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 398 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 355 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-36
Insured Assets Roll
Table 7-6: Unincorporated County Insured Asset Roll Site Value Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Solano County 172 $593,737,350 $595,524,600 $1,189,261,950 2009 H&SS New Lab 1 $7,556,000 $7,556,000 $15,112,000
Ag Office Space 1 $517,750 $517,750 $1,035,500
Ag Office Space/Warehouse (Bldg A) 1 $1,526,750 $1,526,750 $3,053,500 Ag/UC-Coop/District Attorney 1 $3,870,000 $3,870,000 $7,740,000 Alley/walkway between Steffan St. and Benicia Road 1 $1 $1 $2 Animal Shelter - New Bldg 1 $3,094,500 $3,094,500 $6,189,000 Animal Shelter - Shelter Building 1 $3,074,500 $3,074,500 $6,149,000 Annex Lawn (Annex bldg demoed on 09/2009) 1 $1 $1 $2
Assessor/Recorders - (Old Office) 1 $2,125,000 $2,125,000 $4,250,000 Assessor/Recorders - Parking Lot 1 $1 $1 $2
Bay Area Community Services (BACS) 1 $1,791,000 $1,791,000 $3,582,000 Cement Hill Communication Site 1 $306,250 $306,250 $612,500 Chevron/Carl's Junior 1 $1 $1 $2
Child Start 1 $606,250 $606,250 $1,212,500
Claybank Detention Facility 1 $22,813,750 $22,813,750 $45,627,500 Cogeneration Plant 1 $2,954,250 $2,954,250 $5,908,500
Communications & Grounds/Facilities Operations/Sheriff 1 $1,822,500 $1,822,500 $3,645,000 Corp Yard - Owned by Public Works 1 $1,376,250 $1,376,250 $2,752,500 Corp Yard - parking 1 $1 $1 $2
Corp Yard -Fleet Heavy Equipment Shop 1 $1,224,000 $1,224,000 $2,448,000 Corp Yard -Transportation Paint Shop 1 $1,891,500 $1,891,500 $3,783,000 Corp Yard -Transportation Survey, Soils Lab, Mx 1 $480,000 $480,000 $960,000 County Campus Parking Lot 1 $1 $1 $2
County Communication Transmitter Building 1 $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 County Events Center (Old Library) 1 $2,741,000 $2,741,000 $5,482,000 Courts 1 $805,000 $805,000 $1,610,000
Dirt Lot 1 $1 $1 $2
Dixon Corporation Yard - Transportation 1 $201,750 $201,750 $403,500 Dixon Corporation Yard - Transportation - Vacant Lot 1 $1 $1 $2 Facilities Warehouse (shared with Sheriff) 2 $2,265,000 $2,265,000 $4,530,000 Fairfield Government Center 1 $70,529,250 $70,529,250 $141,058,500 Fairfield Government Center Garage 1 $89,803,750 $89,803,750 $179,607,500 Fairfield Library 1 $8,921,000 $8,921,000 $17,842,000
Fairfield Post Office 1 $3,528,250 $3,528,250 $7,056,500 Fairfield Post Office (Parking Lot) 1 $1 $1 $2
Fairgrounds Facilities 1 $43,803,750 $43,803,750 $87,607,500 Family Justice Center 1 $2,345,750 $2,345,750 $4,691,500 Fleet Operations- Light Equipment Shop 1 $878,500 $878,500 $1,757,000 Fouts Springs Youth Facility 1 $1 $1 $2
Fueling System 1 $305,750 $305,750 $611,500
Fuller Bldg: Mx Equipment & Evidence Storage 1 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 Gale Wilson - Donation 1 $1 $1 $2
Gale Wilson - Donation Parcel # was 0048-090-320 1 $1 $1 $2 Gen Serv Surplus (Bldg B) 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 Hall of Justice 1 $27,787,000 $27,787,000 $55,574,000
Hall of Justice/Law Library 1 $712,500 $712,500 $1,425,000 Health & Social Services Headquarters Bldg. 1 $30,045,000 $30,045,000 $60,090,000 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 399 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 356 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-37
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Health & Social Services Health Facility 1 $13,498,000 $13,498,000 $26,996,000 Jail 1 $54,594,750 $54,594,750 $109,189,500
Justice Building 1 $17,619,750 $17,619,750 $35,239,500
Juvenile Hall 1 $14,353,000 $14,353,000 $28,706,000
Kalis Property Vacant 1 $1 $1 $2
Law and Justice 1 $8,479,000 $8,479,000 $16,958,000
Library 1 $2,287,250 $2,287,250 $4,574,500
Maintenance 1 $818,250 $818,250 $1,636,500
Marriott Hotel Site 1 $1 $1 $2
New Foundations (Probation) 1 $2,177,750 $2,177,750 $4,355,500 New H&SS Building 1 $15,366,500 $15,366,500 $30,733,000 New Veteran's Memorial Building 1 $1,870,500 $1,870,500 $3,741,000 Nut Tree Airport RPZ Land - Buzz Oates Purchase - 40.95 ac 6 $6 $6 $12 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport 9 $9 $9 $18
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - entrance road 1 $1 $1 $2
Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - middle of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - northeast hangars 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - northern portion of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - north runway expansion (vacant) 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - south end of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - southeast hangars 2 $2 $2 $4 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport - southern portion of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport Administration bldg 1 $1,907,500 $1,907,500 $3,815,000 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport RPZ - end of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport RPZ - northwest side of runway 1 $1 $1 $2 Nut Tree Nut Tree Airport Vacant Lot - No Fly Zone 9 $9 $9 $18 Office of Emergency Services 1 $1,310,750 $1,966,125 $3,276,875 Office Space: Hertz 1 $2,618,750 $2,618,750 $5,237,500
Old Animal Care Building site - demo'd 4/11, was 1127sf 1 $1 $1 $2 Parcel acquired from Kirkpatrick 1 $1 $1 $2
Parking Lot (South County Master Plan) 2 $2 $2 $4
Parking lot in rear of H&SS Admin. 275 Beck 1 $1 $1 $2 PG&E Tower Right of Way 1 $1 $1 $2
Portable Building 1 $540,000 $540,000 $1,080,000
Probation - Challenge Building 1 $1,980,500 $1,980,500 $3,961,000 Probation - Juvenile Detention Facility 1 $13,195,000 $13,195,000 $26,390,000 Probation Building 1 $10,951,750 $10,951,750 $21,903,500 Probation Parking Lot 1 $1 $1 $2
Proposed Exchg Property for Fouts Springs Ppty 4 $4 $4 $8 Putah Creek 1 $1 $1 $2
Putah Creek bank of trees next to bridge, 505 3 $3 $3 $6 Rio Vista Corporation Yard - Transportation 1 $597,000 $597,000 $1,194,000 Roadway 1 $1 $1 $2
Shed (for Groundskeeping) 1 $180,000 $180,000 $360,000
Sheriff/Coroner 1 $1,638,750 $2,458,125 $4,096,875
Sheriff's Office 1 $625,000 $937,500 $1,562,500
Social Services Building 1 $15,166,500 $15,166,500 $30,333,000 Stanton Correctional Facility 1 $31,950,000 $31,950,000 $63,900,000 Stevenson Bridge Area (for Putah Creek) 1 $1 $1 $2
Strip along Highway 1 $1 $1 $2
Training: Classrooms 1 $2,485,000 $2,485,000 $4,970,000 Training: Shop Bays 1 $7,350,000 $7,350,000 $14,700,000 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 400 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 357 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-38
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Transportation 1 $925,000 $925,000 $1,850,000
Vacant land 3 $3 $3 $6
Vacant Land - Strip next to sidewalk 1 $1 $1 $2
Vacant land along Napa River adjacent to Vjo. River Park 1 $1 $1 $2 Vacant Land Remnant 4 $4 $4 $8
Vacant Land Site for Fire Station 2 $2 $2 $4
Vacant Lot left after construction of Weyland Canal 1 $1 $1 $2 Vacant Lot Remnant 3 $3 $3 $6
Vacant Lot Remnant adjacent to The Reporter 1 $1 $1 $2
Vacant Parcel at Beck Campus (from Stephen Power) 1 $1 $1 $2 Vacant parcel from City of VV 1 $1 $1 $2
Vacant parcel from City of VV - exchanged for 600 Merchant 1 $1 $1 $2 Vacant parcel next to Pierce Lane 1 $1 $1 $2
Vacaville Corporation Yard 1 $72,000 $72,000 $144,000
Veteran's Memorial Building 5 $8,019,250 $8,019,250 $16,038,500 Veteran's Memorial Building parking lot 1 $3,902,500 $3,902,500 $7,805,000 Warehouse-Food & Drygoods 1 $3,022,750 $3,022,750 $6,045,500 Weights & Measures 1 $429,250 $429,250 $858,500
Wilcox Ranch 12 $12 $12 $24
William J. Carroll Govt. Center Site 2 $9,226,751 $9,226,751 $18,453,502 Grand Total 172 $593,737,350 $595,524,600 $1,189,261,950
Data Dictionary
Table 7-7: Critical Facility Data Dictionary
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Jurisdictions County Feature Server - QA With stakeholders Aerial Imagery USDA NAIP to be used unless a better local dataset is available
County Boundary Census
Utilized Census Boundary - Close match to county
provided but with less introduced error in population
analysis
Standard Elevation Model NED 1/3 arc second NED
High Resolution Elevation Model NED, NOAA Will need most accurate available for depth grid creation
GNIS USGS Place names and landmarks
Stream Esri, NHD,
County
Also check https://geohub-
doitgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/waterlines/data
and https://geohub-
doitgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/water-ln
Water Esri, NHD,
County
Also check https://geohub-
doitgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/water-ply/data
Building Outlines County County Open Data sourced
Parcel Geometry County From County Open data 2020 parcel dataset - most complete
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 401 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 358 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-39
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Address Points County These are from Solano Open Data and are simple parcel polygon centroids
Parcel Roll County
REQUESTED THROUGH OES: Parcels_Public_View
Feature Service has most attributes but needs further
investigation Tax_Parcels FS Layer empty but shows
useful fields for Hazus. Attributes needed: APN,
Improvement Value, Land Value, Total Assessed Value,
Market Value, Number of stories, First floor height,
Structure Floor Area (in square feet), Use Code (and
lookup table if needed: residential, industrial,
commercial, education, etc), Year Built, Construction
Type (wood frame, masonry,etc), Foundation Type (slab
on grade, stemwall, etc), Address, EQ Design Level
Emergency Operations Center County Found within Feature Server (CountyBuildings) Emergency Services County Need to reconcile, From Hazus dataset Fire Station County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Hospital County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Police Station County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Administrative County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Cell Tower County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Child Care Facility County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Community Center County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request County/Municipality Insured
Assets County
REQUESTED THROUGH OES: Insurance property
schedule with appraisal values, building
characteristics, and location required. Usual
information includes: Location, Address, City, State, ZIP Code, Sq Feet, Year Built, Stories, Const Desc, Const
Code, Total Real Property, Total Personal Property, Total Rent, Total Values, Excluded Real Value, Excluded
Contents Value, Latitude, Longitude
Dam USACE NID,
DWR
Only NID at this point, may need to follow up with DWR
data
Detention Center County Found within Feature Server (CountyBuildings) Early Learning County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Emergency Shelter County Found within Feature Server (CountyBuildings) Fairground County None Found on County Feature Server
Foster Family Agency CDSS 3rd party source data can be supplemented by local data per availability.
Healthcare Facility County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Historic Building NPS 3rd party source data can be supplemented by local data per availability.
Historic Site NPS, County 3rd party source data can be supplemented by local data per availability. See CAHLAndmarks
Library County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request FINAL for adoption Packet Page 402 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 359 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-40
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Park County Converted to centroid from polygon that was provided in Jake's GIS GDB data request
Power Plant CEC CEC 2020 Power Plant opened Data
Residential Child Care CDSS 3rd party source data can be supplemented by local data per availability.
Residential Elder Care Facility CDSS 3rd party source data can be supplemented by local data per availability.
School County From County Open Data
Senior Center County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Wastewater Treatment Facility Hazus Local jurisdiction preferred over Hazus - None found on County Feature Server
Airport Hazus County dataset had smaller airports (private?) Amtrak Station County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Bridge NBI National bridge inventory more inclusive than various county layers
Breakout Tank County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Bus Stop County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Bus Facility Hazus Supplemental to county provided data Bus Route County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Ferry County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Levee FEMA None Found on County Feature Server
Levee Flood Wall USACE NLD NLD WFS
Levee XS USACE NLD May be deprecated by NLD WFS
NG Pipeline CEC, County CEC Open Data more inclusive than county provided NG Station CEC CEC Open Data
Oil Facility Hazus Hazus data repository
Railroad ESRI From ESRI streetmap
Railway Bridge Hazus Hazus data repository
Street County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Substation CEC
3rd party source data can be supplemented by local
data per availability. - None Found on County Feature
Server
Train Station County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Transmission Line CEC, County CEC or County Feature Server (PowerLinesPGE) Transmission Line Tower CEC
3rd party source data can be supplemented by local
data per availability. None found on County Feature
Server
Wind Turbine County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Hazmat County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request Hazardous Waste Facility County From Jake's GDB Provided from data request FINAL for adoption Packet Page 403 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 360 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
A-41
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Census Block Group US Census
Bureau
Processed by DPS to include demographics report
values as provided by Census ACS
Dam Inundation Cal OES, DWR
Consolidated from DWR and Cal OES data. 3rd party
source data can be supplemented by local data per
availability. - None found on County Feature Server
Shake Potential USGS, CISN Currently outside of GDB
EQ Scenarios 1-X USGS, CISN Chosen qualitatively from shake potential map Flood Hazard FEMA FEMA DFIRM NFHL
Sea Level Rise NOAA NOAA Office for Coastal Management Sea Level Rise Data: 1-10 ft Sea Level Rise Inundation Extent
Landslide Susceptibility CGS CGS Landslide susceptibility for deep bedded landslides
Tsunami Runup CGS, Cal OES CGS data from MOST Model - 10' inundation Wildfire Hazard Severity Zone Cal Fir, CPUC Composite fire layer developed by DPS EQ Fault Zones CGS CGS, USGS Fault zones
Fire Perimeter Calfire NIFC Statewide for burn perimeters 2000-2019 (Geomac Archive)
Fire Regime MFRI USGS https://www.landfire.gov/NationalProductDescriptions
13.php
Expansive Soils USGS Are layers from 2013 plan acceptable? Qfaults USGS CGS zones of required investigation
Repetitive Loss Areas FEMA FEMA Sourced, need county support for data request Best Available Mapping (Flood) USACE Best Available Mapping (BAM), USACE
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 404 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 361 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-42
INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 405 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 362 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B-1
B
Appendix B. Process Documentation
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 406 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 363 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B-2
INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 407 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 364 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Appendix B
Table of Contents
Planning Committee Meeting Documentation..................................................B1 Public Notice & Press Release Documentation ................................................B2 Survey & Results Documentation ........................................................................B3 Mitigation Strategy Prioritization Process Documentation ..........................B4 Website Documentation ........................................................................................B5 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 408 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 365 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 409 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 366 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Planning Committee
Meeting Documentation
Appendix B.1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 410 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 367 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 411 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 368 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-1
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, November 20, 2020 5:15 PM Cc:Don Ryan; Rains, Robyn L.Subject:Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan, first meeting SAVE-THE-DATE! Attachments:Solano MJHMP Meeting #1.ics; Solano MJHMP Meeting #1 Agenda.pdf Hello Solano County, Cities, and stakeholders,
We hope you can all save the date for the first meeting of the Planning Committee to update the County’s Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan! The purpose of the Solano MJHMP is to reduce property losses and avoid injury and/or casualties resulting from natural disasters. Hazard mitigation is the use of sustained, long-term actions to reduce loss of life, personal injury, and property damage that can result from a disaster.
Wednesday, December 16, 2020
2 – 4 PM via Zoom.
A calendar event and draft agenda are attached.
You’ve been invited to this meeting as County and City staff and important stakeholders to add your valuable perspective to the analysis of natural hazard impacts in Solano County. This Planning Team will meet 3-4 times over the coming months, through April 2021. During this initial meeting, you will learn about FEMA’s hazard mitigation program, prevalent hazards throughout the County, and mitigation techniques to reduce damage and injury in the event of a wildfire, flood, earthquake, and other natural hazards.
Please let us know if you would like to update the contact person for your jurisdiction or add to the contact list with other local agencies, nonprofits, or others you think may be interested.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Cheers,
Torie Jarvis
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
HMPC Mtg #1 announcement
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 412 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 369 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-2
1 Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction
Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Planning Committee Meeting #1
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Background
▪ Mitigation Planning Defined
▪ Planning Process Review
o Project Schedule
o Website Review
▪ FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance
▪ 2012 Mitigation Plan Review
o Recent Success Stories
▪ What Has Changed?
▪ Outreach
▪ Next Steps
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: mitigatehazards.com/SolanoHMP
Website Password: Solano2021
Polling Website for Smartphone: pollev.com/dynamicplanning Via Zoom Conference call
Wed., Dec. 16, 2020
2 PM – 4 PM
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84844687973?pwd=NlF4aFE2R
mxReDljQ0d6WDZJRVRqZz09
Passcode: Solano2021
By phone: 669 900 6833 Meeting ID: 848 4468 7973
HMPC Mtg #1 Agenda
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 413 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 370 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-3
1 Solano County Meeting #1: Solano County
Poll Results Report
HMPC Mtg #1 Report 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 414 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 371 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-4
2 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 415 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 372 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-5
3 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 416 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 373 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-6
4 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 417 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 374 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-7
5 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 418 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 375 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-8
6 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 6
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 419 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 376 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-9
7 HMPC Mtg #1 Report 7
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 420 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 377 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-10
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Wednesday, December 2, 2020 1:48 PM To:Don RyanSubject:First HMP MeetingAttachments:Solano MJHMP Meeting #1.ics; Solano MJHMP Meeting #1 Agenda.pdf; Solano NGO Agency Contacts.pdf Hello County and City staff,
Thank you for participating in the first combined Solano Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP), an update of existing HMPs combined into one MJHMP.
We are looking forward to our first meeting of the Planning Committee for the MJHMP Update. This email is a reminder about the upcoming meeting, as we’ve been adding to our list of City contacts for each jurisdiction.
If you are a participating jurisdiction lead listed below and haven’t send Dynamic Planning your contact list, please do so ASAP. We have not heard back from Vallejo, Fairfield, Vacaville, Suisun City, or Dixon. You should have a minimum of five contacts for each City, and should include the PIO.
The first meeting is Wednesday, December 16th from 2-4 PM via zoom. More information is below and a meeting invite and draft agenda are attached. Please RSVP so we can track attendance per FEMA requirements.
We are also looking for additional members of the Planning Committee from your jurisdiction—CERT leaders, school district facilities/ operations, other volunteer agencies in your district. Interested realtors and insurance agents are helpful and always difficult to track down, if you know of any. Their expertise and perspective on hazard impacts is always helpful. Please send any additional contacts to me: [email protected]. A current list of NGOs and agencies we’ve contacted to date is attached.
Cheers,
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
HMPC Mtg #1 and Lead Kick off Announcement 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 421 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 378 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-11
2 SOLANO MULTI-JURISDICTION
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
You are cordially invited to attend the first Planning Committee meeting in the process to update the Mendocino Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP)!
You have been identified as a member of the planning team for your jurisdiction-- and your jurisdiction is participating in the MJHMP (called a Participating Jurisdiction or PJ) by the PJ lead listed at the end of this email.
Therefore you're a member of the MJHMP Planning Committee!
Planning Committee Meeting #1
Wed. Dec. 16, 2020
2 PM to 4 PM
Via Zoom conference call:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84844687973?pwd=NlF4aFE2RmxReDljQ0d6WDZJRVRqZz09
Call-in option: 669 900 6833
Meeting ID: 848 4468 7973
HMPC Mtg #1 and Lead Kick off Announcement 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 422 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 379 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-12
3 While we greatly prefer to meet face-to-face,
due to coronavirus, this meeting will be held via
Zoom. We will hope subsequent meetings can
be in-person. We are pleased to begin the
process to update the Solano Multi-Jurisdiction
Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). The purpose
of the Solano MJHMP is to reduce property
losses and avoid injury and/or casualties
resulting from natural disasters. Hazard
mitigation is the use of sustained, long-term
actions to reduce loss of life, personal injury,
and property damage that can result from a
disaster.
December 2020
16 The Plan is multi-jurisdictional in that 8 different Solano County jurisdictions are participating (the County, and Cities of Benicia, Dixon, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vacaville, and Vallejo). Your jurisdiction's active participation in the HMPC Mtg #1 and Lead Kick off Announcement 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 423 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 380 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-13
4 update process, as demonstrated by your attendance at this meeting, helps us fulfill one of FEMA's prerequisites for Plan approval.
This is the first in a series of 3-4 meetings over the course of four months to review and develop information for the updated MJHMP. During the series of meetings, you will learn about FEMA’s hazard mitigation program, prevalent hazards throughout the County, and mitigation techniques to reduce damage and injury in the event of a wildfire, flood, earthquake, and other natural hazards.
At this first meeting, you will meet our Plan update consultants, Dynamic Planning + Science (DP+S). We will review project scope and schedule, an internal project management protocol, and Cal OES/FEMA plan review requirements. Meeting participants will discuss required multi-jurisdictional planning processes and documentation of such and begin planning a public outreach strategy. Consultants will review the existing MJHMP and demonstrate new Plan development resources and tools available to participating jurisdictions.
Participating Jurisdiction Leads (PJ Leads):
Solano County: Don Ryan, OES Manager
City of Benicia: Josh Chadwick, Fire Chief
City of Dixon: Todd McNeal, Fire Chief
City of Fairfield: John Sturdee, Fire Battalion Chief City of Rio Vista: Jeffrey Armstrong, Fire Chief
City of Suisun City: Justin Vincent, Fire Chief
City of Vacaville: Tim Burke, Assistant Public Works Director/ City Engineer
City of Vallejo: Byron Berhel, Fire Battalion Chief
Please let us know if you need additional information and how we can be of assistance. We appreciate your time and consideration as always. Looking forward to seeing you at the end of the month.
HMPC Mtg #1 and Lead Kick off Announcement 4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 424 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 381 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-14
5 Draft Agenda
Welcome and Introductions
Background
Mitigation Planning Defined
Planning Process Review
o Project Schedule
o Website Review
FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance
2012 Mitigation Plan Review
o Recent Success Stories
What Has Changed?
Outreach
Next Steps
_HMPC Mtg #1 and Lead Kick off Announcement 5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 425 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 382 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-15
Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction
Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
JURISDICTIONAL LEAD MEETING
Agenda
for pre-meeting with jurisdictional leads
▪ Intros
▪ Expectations, your role as PJ Lead
▪ Overview of 5 exercises to complete
1. Develop Planning Team
2. Risk Prioritization
3. Characterize Areas of Concern
4. Capabilities Assessment
5. Mitigation Actions
▪ Outreach and your role as liaison
Via Zoom Conference call
Wed., Dec. 16, 2020
1 PM – 1:45 PM
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83973703130?pwd=UUc2OFNm
NTI3S2FURGg5ajJQYWp0UT09
Passcode: Solano2021
By phone: 669 900 6833 Meeting ID: 839 7370 3130
Project Lead Kick Off Agenda
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 426 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 383 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-16
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 2:43 PMCc:Don RyanSubject:Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Meetings-- Save the Dates!Attachments:Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #2.ics; Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #3.ics Hello Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee,
Thank you all for a great first meeting back on December 16 th, and Happy New Year! Please save the dates for the second and the last HMPC meetings, where we’ll take a deeper dive into hazard vulnerabilities in Solano County. Meeting information is attached and below. Agendas and other meeting info is available at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/meetings (password Solano2021).
Later this week we expect to have the Public Survey on Hazards ready for you all to share within your networks! Please stay tuned and help us get the word out.
Cheers,
Torie
View this email in your browser
Save the Dates!
Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning
Committee (HMPC) Coming Up!
HMPC Meeting #2: Wed. Jan. 27th, 2-4 PM
MPC Mtg #2 and 3 Save the Date 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 427 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 384 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-17
2 HMPC Mtg #3: Wed. Feb. 17, 2-4 PM
More information below!
Above photo of Lake Berryessa during LNU Lightning Complex 2020 by AFP, Josh Edison HMPC Meeting #2: Assessing
Vulnerabilities
Wed. Jan. 27, 2-4 PM via Zoom
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82378724699?pwd=UENDVVJLcWY0bFJIVWlxa2NVdUtIdz09 Meeting ID: 823 7872 4699
Passcode: Solano2021
Call In: 669 900 6833
MPC Mtg #2 and 3 Save the Date 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 428 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 385 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-18
3 Meeting description: At HMPC Meeting #2 we will take a deeper dive into hazard vulnerabilities in Solano County. We will review past events, spur conversation about specific concerns, and explore the new hazard mapping for Solano County— the Risk Assessment Mapping Platform— through interactive polling.
HMPC Meeting #3: Mitigating Hazards
Wed. Jan. 27, 2-4 PM via Zoom
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83026512010?pwd=elZPbHdlR3lDTnBNMDQwbk1DZHMvZz09 Meeting ID: 830 2651 2010
Passcode: Solano2021
Call In: 253 215 8782
Meeting description: At HMPC Meeting #3 we will review what we’ve learned about Solano County’s hazard vulnerabilities and learn how to mitigate those vulnerabilities.
Mitigating hazards looks at a range of projects and planning activities that can reduce or eliminate hazard vulnerabilities in communities. We’ll take a deeper dive into what that looking like in Solano County
Thank you to those of you who attending the first HMPC meeting on December 16th! The meeting recording, results from the polling, and meeting materials are available at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/meetings (password Solano2021) Click here to visit project page!
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
MPC Mtg #2 and 3 Save the Date 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 429 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 386 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-19
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Monday, January 25, 2021 6:51 PM
Cc:Don RyanSubject:Solano Mtg #2 THIS WEDNESDAY! Attachments:Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #2.ics Hello Solano County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, We’re looking forward to our second meeting of the Planning Committee for updating the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) and developing the County’s first combined Multi-Jurisdictional HMP for the County and all cities in the county . .
Our second meeting is this Wednesday, Jan. 27, from 2-4 PM via Zoom. Agenda and other meeting info is available at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/meetings (password Solano2021). Meeting info:
Meeting link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82378724699?pwd=UENDVVJLcWY0bFJIVWlxa2NVdUtIdz09 Meeting ID: 823 7872 4699
Passcode: Solano2021
Call In: 669 900 6833
At this meeting, we will take a deeper dive into hazard vulnerabilities in Solano County. We will review past events, spur conversation about specific concerns, and explore the new hazard mapping for Solano County— the Risk Assessment Mapping Platform. We also will solicit input on ranking priority hazards in Solano County through interactive polling.
Thank you!
Torie and the DP+S Team (consultant team working on the HMP) TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
BBaacckkggrroouunndd oonn tthhee HHMMPP DDeevveellooppmmeenntt:: The term Hazard Mitigation describes actions that communities can take to help reduce or eliminate long-term risks caused by natural disasters. Natural Hazards in any jurisdiction can include flooding, wildfire, landslides, earthquake, and drought. During the planning process, prioritization will be given to the hazards within the jurisdiction that are most likely to occur. Hazard mitigation planning and projects can create safer jurisdictions by reducing loss of life and property damage associated with future disasters. Each dollar spent on mitigation can save the jurisdiction four to seven dollars! See mitigatehazards.com/ for more information.
You’ve been identified as a key stakeholder in the Planning Committee because of your local knowledge and experience from your role as a regional agency, neighboring jurisdiction, business owner, or resident of the County.
HMPC Mtg #2 Reminder
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 430 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 387 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-20
1 Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC)
Meeting #2
Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2020 Via Zoom Conference call
2-4 PM Use this link
Password: Solano2021
Call-in option: 669 900 6833
Meeting ID: 823 7872 4699
Zoom User Guide
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Meeting #1 Brief Recap
▪ Risk Assessment/ Community Vulnerability Review
o Review Risk Assessment Mapping Platform (RAMP)
▪ Risk Matrix Group Exercise
▪ Hazard Problem Statement Exercise Review
▪ Review Outreach Materials
o Survey
o Web content
▪ Next Steps
o Jurisdictional Exercises (capabilities assessment, success stories, risk matrix, and problem statements)
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: http://mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/ Website Username/Password: Solano2021
Polling Website for Smartphone: www.pollev.com/dynamicplanning
HMPC Mtg #2 Agenda
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 431 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 388 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-21
Solano County Meeting #2: Solano County
Poll Results Report
HMPC Mtg #2 Report 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 432 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 389 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-22
1 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 433 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 390 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-23
2 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 434 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 391 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-24
3 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 435 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 392 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-25
4 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 436 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 393 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-26
5 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 6
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 437 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 394 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-27
6 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 7
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 438 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 395 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-28
7 HMPC Mtg #2 Report 8
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 439 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 396 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-29
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:21 PM To:Don RyanSubject:SURVEY RELEASE and Mtg DatesAttachments:Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #2.ics; Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #3.ics; PR_Survey_Information.jpg Hello Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee,
Two announcements for you all this evening:
1. We are excited to share with you the PUBLIC SURVEY for the Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan. Note, anyone who participates in the survey and chooses to share contact info is automatically entered to win a $150 Stihl voucher. The survey will be open through the end of February. a. Please share survey information in your networks, websites, social media feeds, etc. Please share your outreach with me/DP+S so we can document outreach in the Plan update. b. Please take the survey, especially stakeholders who are not city or county employees. c. A survey graphic is attached for promotion.
d. The survey is available at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/get-involved.
2. Save the dates for the final two meetings of the Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee to review and discuss county-wide hazard vulnerabilities. Meeting #2 is scheduled for Wed. Jan. 27 from 2-4 PM and Meeting #3 is scheduled for Wed. Feb. 17 from 2-4 PM. More information is found on the calendar invites (attached) and at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/solano-meetings/ (password: Solano2021). We are resending this save-the-date as we received several bounce backs to the one sent last week (likely because of the HTML included).
a. We are also outreaching separately with City and County leads to coordinate meetings on City and County infrastructure vulnerability the first two weeks of February. Please help us stay on track to have the administrative draft HMP by the end of February and get these meetings scheduled.
Thanks, all!
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Survey plus Mtg #2 and 3 Save the Date
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 440 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 397 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-30
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, February 12, 2021 2:58 PM To:Don RyanSubject:Reminder: third Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting Attachments:Solano County Meeting #3 Agenda.pdf; Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee Mtg #3.ics Hello Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee,
It’s hard to believe it’s been a month since our last meeting of the HMPC.
A reminder: Our third and final HMPC Meeting is next Wednesday, Feb. 17th, from 2-4 PM. Meeting info and agenda attached. Meeting information also available on mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/solano-meetings/.
At this meeting, we’ll revisit the overall goals of the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, provide updates on all the work that’s occurred since the last meeting and turn towards the mitigation strategy in the Plan.
Please continue sharing the Public Hazard Mitigation Survey in your networks! http://mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/get-involved/ . Reach out if you need more materials for sharing.
We’re looking forward to seeing you all on Wednesday,
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
HMPC Mtg #3 Announcement
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 441 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 398 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-31
1 Solano County Multi -Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee
Meeting #3
Wednesday, Feb. 17, 202 1 Via Zoom Conference call
2 -4 PM Use this link
Password: Solano2021
Call-in option: 669 900 6833
Meeting ID: 830 2651 2010
Zoom User Guide
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Meeting #2 and Jurisdictional Exercises, Brief Recap
▪ Crafting a Multi-Jurisdictional Plan: Where we are headed ▪ Mitigation Action Strategy
o Explore the Mitigation Action Support Tool
▪ Setting Plan Goals
▪ Developing a Nexus to HMA Funding
▪ Maintaining Your Plan: the Next 5 Years
▪ Next Steps
Project Webpage: mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/
Meeting Resources: mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/solano-meetings/ Website Username/Password: Solano2021
Polling Website for Smartphone: pollev.com/dynamicplanning HMPC Mtg #3 Agenda
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 442 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 399 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-32
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Monday, May 3, 2021 10:25 AM
To:[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]:Daniel Spivak; Ethan E. MobleySubject:FOR REVIEW: Admin draft of Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan and Vallejo AnnexAttachments:City of Vallejo Annex Review.ics Importance:High
Dear Vallejo Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee,
We are exciting to present the long-awaited administrative draft of the Solano County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). We are requesting your review and input on this draft before Friday, June 4th.
Links to collaborative PDFs for Volume 1 (which serves as umbrella document and unincorporated County HMP) and each municipal annex are available at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/admindraft/ (password: Solano2021). Vallejo’s annex is available directly via this link.
Collaborative PDFs allow commenters to see each other’s comments and respond to one another, so we recommend using this feature. You can also provide comments via email or online form. Note: each participating jurisdiction is invited to provide comment on Volume 1 of this MJHMP, the umbrella document and unincorporated County-wide document.
These drafts are only available to participating jurisdictions at this time. We will move to public review in June; you are further able to offer edits during public review.
We have several tips for this administrative review included at the bottom of the admin draft webpage. Importantly, we encourage everyone to take a look at the mitigation strategy at the end of the annex as this is the first time you’ll see this new information. At our upcoming meeting, we’ll review an alternate method for editing mitigation actions through MAST, the mitigation action support tool that is now live on mitigatehazards with the password Solano2021.
Any yellow highlighting you see in any document in a placeholder that will be updated before moving to public draft.
We will talk to you this Wed. at 1 PM (invite attached) to review this administrative draft along two other topics: the process for QAQC’ing data in the risk assessment mapping platform and an introduction to the new climate vulnerability appendices in development. We’ll send out scheduling in a second email.
Let us know if you have questions about this process, and thank you for your time! TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
(she, her, hers)
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Example Jurisdictional Admin Draft Email
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 443 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 400 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-33
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Wednesday, March 31, 2021 4:37 PM Subject:Solano HMP Update
Hello to jurisdictions participating in the Solano County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP),
We are putting the finishing touches on the draft mitigation strategy, umbrella plan, and jurisdictional annexes. We expect to have administrative drafts of Volume 1 (the County and umbrella plan) and jurisdictional annexes in the next two weeks (except special districts). Public review follows admin review, and then review by Cal OES and FEMA.
We are entering the home stretch!
We plan to schedule a jurisdictional call in April to 1) introduce a process for QAQC’ing your jurisdictional data in RAMP; 2) review the admin draft, and 3) discuss some new climate vulnerability assessment materials we’ll be producing as appendices to Vol 1 and annexes. Your jurisdictional contact will reach out shortly to schedule this call, which can be with the jurisdictional lead or the full jurisdictional planning team.
The County has been hard at work getting word out about the public Hazard Mitigation survey--- and the County now has received well over 1,800 survey responses, 9 in Spanish (view here and see below survey tally)! We will close the survey at the end of this week and provide a survey summary for you all.
Lastly, the County is bringing on Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District and in discussions with Solano County Water Agency to become participating jurisdictions in the MJHMP. These special districts would participate in “catch up” planning committee meetings and go through hazard prioritization and vulnerability discussions similar to all other planning jurisdictions. Their annexes can be submitted for approval by FEMA at a later date as well.
Let us know if you have any questions, and we’ll be in touch shortly re: admin draft HMP and scheduling a follow up meeting,
Thank you!
Torie
Admin Draft Notice 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 444 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 401 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-34
2 TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
(she, her, hers)
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Admin Draft Notice 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 445 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 402 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-35
Community Group or Local
Agency Date of outreach
Result of outreach (if
not on Planning
Committee) CRS Points
Greenbelt Alliance, Terri
Shore
11/20/2020 Greenbelt Alliance
confirmed unable to
attend Planning
Committee, held call to
share research and
outreach efforts on
4/13/2021
2 Solano County Black
Chamber of Commerce
(elease AT
solanoblackchamber.org)
11/20/2020 No response 1
Solano Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce (info AT
solanohcc.com)
11/20/2020 Attended all Planning
Committee meetings,
provided input on
Spanish Survey
1 Solano Economic
Development Corporation
(sandy AT solanoedc.org;
robert AT solanoedc.org)
11/20/2020 No response/ did not
participate
1 Solano County Water Agency
(rsanford AT scwa2.com;
aflorendo AT scwa2.com;
JBarich AT scwa2.com_
11/20/2020 Provided data,
background info for
County flooding
3/16/2021, and became
a participating
jurisdiction
2 Vallejo Flood and
Wastewater District
2/10/2021 Provided data,
background info for
Vallejo flooding
3/21/2021, and became
a participating
jurisdiction
2 Sustainable Solano
(Jonathan Erwin, Elena
Karoulina)
2/25/2021 Exchanged data about
flood resiliency plan and
HMP in a call on
3/2/2021, further
coordination and added
to Planning Committee
2 In addition to other listed community groups who ended up participating on the Planning Committee.
Other Jurisdictions Contacted
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 446 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 403 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-36
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, November 20, 2020 2:46 PM To:[email protected]; [email protected]:Mitigating hazards in Solano County Dear Robert and Sandy,
We are currently kicking off an update to the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, and would welcome your participation in the Planning Committee that will meet 3-4 times throughout the update process (between December and April). It’s important to have the economic development perspective to understand economic impacts of hazard events in our analyses. It looks like Sandy was part of the team who assisted in the last Hazard Mitigation Plan update in 2015.
For now, we’ll keep Sandy on the contact list from the previous update. Please let us know if there is better contact information for you all. We hope to “see” you at our first Planning Committee meeting: Wed. Dec. 16 from 2-4 PM (held virtually).
Thank you!
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Solano Econ Dev Contact - Nov 20 2020
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 447 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 404 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-37
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, November 20, 2020 2:36 PM To:'[email protected]'Subject:Another HMP in Solano County Hi Teri,
We really appreciate your attendance with the City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan. We’re also consultants working on the Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan that includes all the municipalities in Solano County.
It looks like you all have a staff person, Kevin Riley, working directly in Solano. Do you think he would be able/ interested in participating in our process? Would you mind connecting us if so? I’m not seeing a contact for him on your website.
Thanks so much!
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Greenbelt Alliance Contact - Nov 20 2020
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 448 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 405 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-38
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Paris Badat Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:18 PM To:Torie JarvisCc:Teri ShoreSubject:Intro and Meeting Request Hi Torie,
I hope you are having a good week! My name is Paris Badat and I manage corporate relationships for Greenbelt Alliance. I know that you engaged with our Director of Advocacy Teri Shore on public participation in the update of the City of Napa’s Hazard Mitigation Plan.
I am reaching out because we are at an exciting moment here at Greenbelt Alliance, we recently launched our new strategic plan and are looking to connect with other organizations around the region to share our vision and deepen collaborations. Our new body of work builds on our amazing decades-long legacy, but at the same time represents a significant evolution for the organization - leveraging our expertise in land-use policy advocacy and regional collaboration to realize a climate-resilient Bay Area.
Like Dynamic Planning, we are focused on the connection between land-use decisions and climate risks, and how to reduce the risks to our communities through policies, programs, and actions. We are developing original research and policy recommendations to increase resilience to multiple climate hazards in cities and counties across the Bay Area. We’d love to find some time to chat about what we are working on, learn about the projects you are prioritizing, and understand how we can support one another’s efforts.
Please let me know if you are available for a thirty-minute meeting with our program team in the coming weeks.
Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.
Cheers,
Paris Badat
Corporate and Foundation Relations Manager
(415) 543-6771 X 315
Greenbelt Alliance
312 Sutter Street, Suite 402 | San Francisco, CA 94108
We're adapting to a changing climate. Get our new Strategic Plan to find out how.
Greenbelt.org | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter
Greenbelt Alliance Followup - Feb 23 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 449 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 406 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-39
1 Torie Jarvis
Subject:Dynamic Planning / Greenbelt Alliance
Start:Tue 4/13/2021 12:00 PMEnd:Tue 4/13/2021 12:30 PM
Recurrence:(none)
Meeting Status:Accepted
Organizer:[email protected]
You have been invited to the following event.
Dynamic Planning / Greenbelt Alliance
When Tue Apr 13, 2021 11am – 11:30am Pacific Time - Los Angeles Calendar [email protected]
Who • [email protected] - organizer
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
more details »
Greenbelt Alliance is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Dynamic Planning Meeting
Time: Apr 13, 2021 11:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/4155436771?pwd=MFZiMjFBZmV2V3BuZjlNeXAwQzNrdz09 Meeting ID: 415 543 6771
Passcode: 312
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,4155436771#,,,,*312# US (San Jose)
+13462487799,,4155436771#,,,,*312# US (Houston)
Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 929 436 2866 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
Meeting ID: 415 543 6771
Passcode: 312
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbtIkLg7dn Going ([email protected])? Yes - Maybe - No more options » Greenbelt Alliance Meeting - April 13 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 450 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 407 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-40
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, November 20, 2020 2:43 PM To:[email protected]:Solano Co Hazard Mitigation Plan Hello to the Solano Hispanic Chamber of Commerce,
We are currently kicking off an update to the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, and would welcome your participation in the Planning Committee that will meet 3-4 times throughout the update process (between December and April). It’s important to have the perspective of Hispanic-owned businesses in Solano County to understand how your group is affected by a slate of hazards we’ll be analyzing.
We’re planning to add the Solano HCCC to our email list for meetings. Please let us know if there is better contact information for you all. We hope to “see” you at our first Planning Committee meeting: Wed. Dec. 16 from 2-4 PM (held virtually).
Thank you!
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Solano Hispanic CoC Contact - Nov 20 2020
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 451 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 408 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-41
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Jeff Barich Sent:Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:59 PM
To:Torie JarvisCc:Ethan E. Mobley; Roland Sanford; Alex RabidouxSubject:RE: Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan Torie –
I am available the following times:
Wednesday the 10th after 2pm
Thursday the 11th after 2pm
Monday the 15th after 2pm
Tuesday the 16th after 12pm
Wednesday the 17th after 1pm
I will let Roland reply himself, and I added my supervisor Alex Rabidoux in case he is interested in joining the conversation.
Jeffrey M. Barich, P.E.
Senior Water Resources Engineer
Solano County Water Agency
810 Vaca Valley Parkway, Suite 203
Vacaville, CA 95688
[email protected]
Office: (707) 455-1109
Cell: (707) 724-3587
From: Torie Jarvis
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 12:24 PM
To: Roland Sanford ; Jeff Barich
Cc: Ethan E. Mobley
Subject: Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan
Hi Roland and Jeff,
We are working on crafting the County’s first multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan (MJHMP). I believe my colleague, Ty Johnson, reached out to Roland to ask some questions about county efforts to mitigate flood. We were wondering specifically about a home-raising program the SCWA had and may have reinvigorated. It would be great to set up a call to have some discussion about flood impacts and mitigation needed in the County.
In addition, we are currently discussing adding the Vallejo Sanitation and Wastewater District to the County’s MJHMP as a late addition. They would otherwise need to update their HMP next year including identifying funding sources for such. We wanted to check in with SCWA and see if you all might be interested in the same add-on option, and happy to discuss what this would look like.
Would you have some time to get on the phone this week or next week?
- Wed. 10:30-12 or after 2 PM
SCWA Meeting Scheduling - Mar 9 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 452 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 409 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-42
1 Torie Jarvis
Subject:Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan call with SWCALocation: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476592658 Start:Tue 3/16/2021 1:00 PMEnd:Tue 3/16/2021 2:00 PM
Recurrence:(none)
Meeting Status:Meeting organizer
Organizer:Torie JarvisRequired Attendees:Ethan E. Mobley; Roland Sanford; Alex Rabidoux; Jeff BarichOptional Attendees:Don Ryan; Brian Greer DP+S is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89476592658
Meeting ID: 894 7659 2658
One tap mobile
+12532158782,,89476592658# US (Tacoma)
+13462487799,,89476592658# US (Houston)
Dial by your location
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
Meeting ID: 894 7659 2658
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kkoV85Wdy
SCWA Meeting - Mar 16 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 453 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 410 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-43
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Torie JarvisSent:Friday, November 20, 2020 2:39 PM To:[email protected]:Solano Hazard Mitigation Plan Hello to the Solano County Black Chamber of Commerce,
We are currently kicking off an update to the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, and would welcome your participation in the Planning Committee that will meet 3-4 times throughout the update process (between December and April). It’s important to have the perspective of small businesses and the experience of people of color in Solano County to understand how small businesses are affected by a slate of hazards we’ll be analyzing.
We’re planning to add you to our email list for meetings. Please let us know if there is better contact information for you all—this is the only contact email we’re finding currently. Also, we hope to “see” you at our first Planning Committee meeting: Wed. Dec. 16 from 2-4 PM (held virtually).
Thank you!
Torie
TToorriiee JJaarrvviiss
970-323-4330
[email protected]
Planning Manager
www.dynamicplanning.co
Solano Black CoC Contact- Nov 20 2020
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 454 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 411 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-44
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Jonathan Erwin Sent:Thursday, February 25, 2021 8:43 PM To:Torie JarvisCc:[email protected]; Alma HernandezSubject:Re: Flood/ hazard mitigationAttachments:Flood Resiliency Plan.pdf Hello Torie,
Great to connect! - Thank you Alma for bringing people and projects together!
Please find the document I shared attached.
We would love to hop on a call next week if you are available. Let me know if there are some dates/times that work best for you and we can coordinate on our end.
Have a great weekend in the meantime!
Best,
Jonathan
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:58 PM Torie Jarvis wrote:
Hi Elena and Jonathan,
Your project sounds great and so connected to the hazard mitigation plan update. I’m glad we’re able to connect (thanks Alma!).
I just wanted to say hello for now and touch base on how we might coordinate to make sure we’re incorporating your work into our mitigation strategy. It would be great to explicitly cite to the Flood Resiliency Plan and make sure we’re calling for implementing the Plan even if you aren’t sure of the actions you’re looking at yet.
Would you want to hop on a call soon to discuss?
I have all sorts of thoughts, like how we might utilize our Risk Assessment Mapping Platform or other products – especially while the County is paying for this!
Sustainable Solano Contact - Feb 25 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 455 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 412 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.1-45
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Jonathan Erwin Sent:Monday, March 1, 2021 12:50 PM To:Torie JarvisCc:Elena KaroulinaSubject:Re: Flood/ hazard mitigation Hello Torie,
Great to connect last week and thank you for sharing your presentation with us! I look forward to connecting tomorrow. I just sent a cal invite with call information, but also see it below.
Related, you mentioned a public survey that is open for comment in the presentation. We would love to include a shout- out to it in our newsletter going out tomorrow. It includes around 4500 residents and stakeholders across the county.
Do you mind writing a short paragraph blurb about it and we would be happy to include it.
Thank you!
Jonathan
Call Info:
SuSol Team is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: SuSol Team's Personal Meeting Room
Join Zoom Meeting
https://zoom.us/j/6613021598
Meeting ID: 661 302 1598
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,6613021598# US (San Jose)
+12532158782,,6613021598# US (Tacoma)
Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
Meeting ID: 661 302 1598
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/adcMWqudR4
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 4:44 PM Torie Jarvis wrote:
Hi Elena and Jonathan.
Sustainable Solano Followup - Mar 1 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 456 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 413 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.1-46
1 Torie Jarvis
Subject:Hazard Mitigation Plan discussionLocation: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86970056049 Start:Fri 3/12/2021 9:00 AMEnd:Fri 3/12/2021 10:00 AM
Recurrence:(none)
Meeting Status:Meeting organizer
Organizer:Torie JarvisRequired Attendees:Keith Sorsdal; Ethan E. Mobley; Brian Greer DP+S is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Note time corrected to 8 AM PST, not 7!
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86970056049
Meeting ID: 869 7005 6049
One tap mobile
+12532158782,,86970056049# US (Tacoma)
+13462487799,,86970056049# US (Houston)
Dial by your location
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
Meeting ID: 869 7005 6049
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/k63cskqE
VFWD HMP Discussion Invite - Mar 12 2021
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 457 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 414 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Public Notice & Press
Release Documentation
Appendix B.2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 458 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 415 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 459 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 416 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.2-1
Alert Solano Survey Notice
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 460 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 417 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.2-2
Benicia Fire Dept Survey FB post
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 461 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 418 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.2-3
1 Torie Jarvis
From:Della Olm Sent:Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:15 PM To:Torie JarvisSubject:FW: The latest news from City of Benicia Hi Torie,
Please see the newsletter below. ����
Della Olm
Management Analyst
Benicia Fire Department
707-746-4272 (Office)
707-771-4229 (Cell)
From: Erik Upson, Interim City Manager On Behalf Of Erik Upson, Interim City Manager
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 9:02 AM
To: GRP-EVERYONE
Subject: The latest news from City of Benicia
City of Benicia This Week
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of thi s pi ctu re from the Internet.
City of Benicia This Week
read it - watch it - like it - share it
In this edition: Holiday Closure, COVID Vaccine Update, Park Improvement, Eastern Gateway Workshop This Week, Take the Survey and Enter to Win, Thanks to Public Works Crew
View as Webpage
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. https://files.co nstantcontact.com/7be9c9e6001/975b9e6e-99ce-41b2-b540-8a0e2bd27d28.jpg?a=1134808427198
Message from the Interim City Manager
January 18, 2021
Benicia Newsletter re Survey 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 462 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 419 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.2-4
2 Hello Everyone,
Continuing my focus on volunteerism, today I focus on a very special group looking out for our seniors, the Carquinez Village.
Benicia is an amazing community, and it has an especially vibrant senior population. In fact, while the median age in California is 36.5 and in Solano County it’s 36.9, in Benicia its 43.0…and rising. I first became aware of this unique phenomena in conversations with Terry Scott of our Arts & Culture Commission several years ago, and it helped me realize the importance of addressing the impact of this on our community in regards to providing public safety.
In my travels and in the great fortune I’ve had in being embraced by my wife’s culture through her amazing Filipino family, I’ve seen how families and cultures can embrace, nurture and thus extend the quality of life for their elders. What if we, as a community , could do the same? That is just what Carquinez Village is about. Carquinez Village is a nonprofit founded in 2017. It doesn’t have a physical space because it’s really more about helping seniors age in place with peace of mind as part of a ‘vibrant community of older adults’. The volunteers are mostly seniors themselves. They have 100 members and 50 direct service volunteers. In their first pre-Pandemic years their primary service was transportation. Now they have pivoted and their primary service has become ‘friendly contacts’. I can only imagine how wonderful and important that service is to seniors largely cut-off from any social contacts, even if via Zoom. They also do errands, grocery shopping, garden chores, and even provide technical assistance (you can imagine how important that is for seniors right now!).
During the Pandemic they have been working closely with other nonprofits to deliver food to seniors in need. They have expanded the number of programs they offer via Zoom, in an effort to support one of their key goals in keeping seniors mentally active and engaged.
They do still provide transportation for doctor visits and, critically, will be assisting seniors in getting to their vaccination appointments! Details on the vaccine rollout are shared in an article below.
Since being introduced to Susan Neuhaus and Judie Donaldson, I’ve been increasingly impressed with the work of Carquinez Village and the important role it can play in making our community a better place and addressing a critical link in the support network for our seniors. Let’s help grow this organization.
If you are interested in being a part of this amazing community, donating or becoming a volunteer, please reach out them at carquinezvillage.org, on Facebook, or by calling 707.297.2472.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Benicia This Week!
Erik Upson
Interim City Manager
[email protected]
City News
Benicia Newsletter re Survey 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 463 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 420 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.2-5
3 Holiday Closure
Benicia City Offices and Benicia Community Center will be closed on Monday, January 18, in observance of Martin
Luther King Jr. Day.
Requests for emergency water and sewer service may be made at the Benicia Police Department at 200 East L Street or by calling 707.745.3411.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
COVID Vaccine Update
While the pandemic continues and many parts of our nation are severely impacted, our biggest hope is that the current surge will soon begin to subside and that, as more of the population receives their vaccines, we will see significant improvements.
The COVID-19 vaccination is one of the most important tools to end the pandemic. Distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine in California began on December 14, 2020 with the launch of the “Vaccinate ALL 58” vaccine distribution campaign. The State is prioritizing vaccines for equitable distribution. Specifically, Californians will be prioritized as shown in the chart below
Last week, the Governor announced that California is prioritizing individuals 65 and over to receive the vaccine to increase the pace of COVID-19 vaccine distribution to those at greatest risk. A new system is expected to launch this week to notify people who are eligible to receive a vaccine.
More information on Solano County's rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine is available at https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/ph/coronavirus_links/covid_19_vaccines.asp . Scroll down to find phone numbers for your health care provider. While supplies are limited, you may be able to schedule an appointment for your vaccine by calling this number, if you meet the current criteria.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Park Improvement
Willow Glen Park at West 7th and K Street has received a recent improvement. The City contracted to remove and
replace a 40-year-old asphalt walkway with a 220 feet
concrete walkway. This will allow for better access to the playground and restroom and improve the aesthetics of the park. The new pathway should be completed and available for access beginning the week of January 25.
The project was funded by impact fees generated by nearby in-fill development.
Information about all of Benicia's great parks is available here:
https://www.ci.benicia.ca.us/parks .
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Benicia Newsletter re Survey 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 464 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 421 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.2-6
4 Eastern Gateway Workshop This Week
The City of Benicia is hosting an
interactive remote workshop for the
Eastern Gateway Study. The workshop
will be on Thursday, January 21, 6 - 8 p.m., via Zoom. At this workshop you will learn about recent progress made on the project and provide feedback on important aspects of the new zoning changes such as allowable uses, building and site design.
Through the Eastern Gateway Study, the City will update the zoning regulations to encourage mixed use development around the intersection of Military East and East Fifth Street. An overarching goal of the study is to facilitate the construction of new housing.
Meeting materials, including an agenda, the Draft Vision and Zoning District Approach document, and two videos explaining these materials can now be found on left side of the project webpage, www.ci.benicia.ca.us/easterngateway . To get the most out of the workshop, staff recommends reading the Vision and Zoning District Approach document or watching the two videos prior to the workshop.
Click here for a link to the virtual workshop and instructions on how to join the meeting. To ensure that we have sufficient staff and zoom capacity for everyone to participate in the workshop, we are asking that you RSVP before the event. You can RSVP by calling or emailing Danielle Crider at 707.746.4324 or [email protected]. However, everyone is welcome to attend, regardless of whether you RSVP for the event.
We look forward to seeing you over Zoom on January 21! In the meantime, if you have questions, please contact Danielle Crider using the information above.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Take the Survey and Enter to Win
The Solano Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee
needs your help in creating the County's Hazard
Mitigation Plan. The purpose of a hazard mitigation
plan is to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards.
Solano County is developing its first multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan, pulling together and updating existing plans for the County and for the Cities of Vallejo, Fairfield, Vacaville, Suisun City, Benicia, Dixon, and Rio Vista. This update will strive to make the County, its residents, and visitors less vulnerable to future hazard events.
They need your input! Take the survey at mitigatehazards.com/solanohmp/get-involved. If you provide your contact information, you will be entered to win a $150 Stihl Power Tool gift certificate!
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Thanks to Public Works Crew
On December 25, while many residents were enjoying a socially distanced Christmas Day, Public Works staff conducted an emergency shutdown of the Water Treatment Plant due to a leak in the City’s 36-inch Raw Water Treatment Line. This shutdown was undetectable by customers thanks to the rapid, professional actions of City operations and field crews. While To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Benicia Newsletter re Survey 4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 465 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 422 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.2-7
5 the leak was being repaired, Benicia customers immediately began using treated water sourced from Lake Herman.
Last week, the Interim City Manager stopped by the Public Works Corporation Yard to thank staff who sacrificed holiday time with their families to ensure Benicia residents had safe, uninterrupted water service.
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Save the Date
Jan 18 - City Offices closed for Martin Luther King Jr Holiday. Jan 19 - City Council meeting, 7 p.m. via livestream. Watch live at https://www.ci.benicia.ca.us/agendas . See the Full Agenda for more information. Jan 22 - City Offices closed for Alternate Friday.
Modified service due to COVID-19
City Hall is open from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. If you require entrance to City Hall offices outside of these hours, please make arrangements with staff from the department that you will be visiting.
All visitors shall be required to enter City Hall from East L street through the door located on the left (East) side of the building closest to the Post Office. Please check in with the staff person at the designated Welcome Window.
You will be required to wear a face covering over both your nose and mouth for the duration of your visit to City Hall. Please maintain 6 feet of social distancing between other visitors and staff.
Do not visit City Hall if you are experiencing symptoms of COVID-19. Appointments can always be rescheduled.
Contact Us
City of Benicia This Week is published each Monday morning. Previous editions are available here. We also communicate on Nextdoor.com and AlertSolano.com. Sign up now! Benicia Newsletter re Survey 5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 466 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 423 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.2-8
6 Join our mailing list!
City of Benicia This Week is published each Monday morning. Previous editions are available here. We also communicate on Nextdoor.com and AlertSolano.com. Sign up now!
City of Benicia | 707.746.4200 | 250 East L Street, Benicia, CA | [email protected]
See what's happening on our other social sites:
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of thi s pi ctu re from the Internet.Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of thi s pi ctu re from the Internet.Twi tter
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
City of Benicia | 250 East L Street, Benicia, CA 94510
Unsubscribe [email protected]
Update Profile | About our service provider
Sent by [email protected] powered by
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.
Try email marketing for free today!
Benicia Newsletter re Survey 6
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 467 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 424 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.2-9
Fairfield Fire Dept Survey FB Post
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 468 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 425 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.2-10
Solano Water Agency Survey FB Post
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 469 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 426 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Survey & Results
Documentation
Appendix B.3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 470 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 427 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 471 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 428 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-1
1 Solano County
2021 Multi-Jurisdiction
Hazard Mitigation Plan:
Public Hazard Mitigation Survey
Summary
Solano Survey Summary 1
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 472 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 429 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-2
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2
Summary
An 8-question community survey was distributed by the County via a number of online platforms, including Facebook posts by participating jurisdictions and a notification across the SolanoAlert system. The results of the survey are used to ensure that the priorities of the County and participating jurisdictions match those of the residents/community members. The response rate for the survey has been remarkably successful, in large part due to comprehensive efforts at distributing the survey widely and ensuring its ease of access. The survey response rate by demographic is listed here:
English Survey Responses
1,842
Spanish Survey Responses
8 The survey respondents represent participating jurisdictions, the County, and other jurisdictions. The locales identified by survey respondents are shown in Figure 1. “Other” locales include, but are not limited to, Napa, Yolo, Sacramento, and Sonoma Counties and cities within those areas.
Figure 1: Where do Survey Respondents Live?
28%
25%
14%
11%
7%
6%
5%
3%
3%
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%
City of Vacaville
City of Fairfield
City of Vallejo
City of Benicia
Unic. Solano County
Suisun City
City of Rio Vista
City of Dixon
Other
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 2
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 473 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 430 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-3
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3 The following is a brief summary of responses:
▪Property at risk? 73.1% of participants believe their property is at risk from a natural hazard disaster. ▪Hazards experienced? Respondents have experienced the following hazards:
o Earthquakes (51%)
o Wildfire (44.1%)
o Pandemic (55.4%)
o Drought (38.4%)
o Only 7.8% of respondents had not experienced a natural hazard. ▪Consider risk of hazards with home purchase? 57.6% of participants considered the risk of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.
▪Informed about hazard risks? 47.6% of respondents felt they were well-informed about the dangers of natural hazards, while 38.4% felt somewhat informed and 13.9% felt uninformed. ▪What incentives would encourage home protection from hazards? Top three responses:
o rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (69.6%) o insurance premium discounts (64.4%)
o building permit fee waivers (47.4%)
▪Top mitigation projects for local governments to focus on? Top responses:
o Work on improving damage resistance of utilities (79%) o Ensure emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center, and communication towns have backup power generators (62.6%)
o Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities (60.5%)
o Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (60.1%) o Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (58.7%) o Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (56.9%)
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 3
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 474 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 431 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-4
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 4
Question-By-Question Summary
Question 1: Where does the survey respondent live?
The below pie chart shows the breakdown of where respondents live. Solano County and municipal respondents include:
▪City of Vacaville: 27.5% ▪Unincorporated Solano County: 6.7% ▪City of Fairfield: 24.5% ▪City of Suisun City: 5.8%
▪City of Vallejo: 13.9% ▪City of Rio Vista: 4.6%
▪City of Benicia: 10.8% ▪City of Dixon: 3%
The remaining respondents represented a wide array of nearby municipalities and counties. These included:
Napa County, the City of Davis, the City of American Canyon, the City of Winters, Yolo County, Sacramento County, Sonoma County, the unincorporated community of Yolano, the City of Paradise, Lake Berryessa, the City of Rancho Solano, the Solano County Water Agency, Green Valley Highlands, San Francisco, the City of Eureka, the City of Cordelia, the City of Carmichael, the city of Rodeo, Contra Costa County, Humboldt County, the City of Antioch.
Spanish survey results:
The Majority of Spanish respondents came from the City of Fairfield (66.7%). The remaining respondents came from the City of Dixon (22.2%) and the City of Benicia (11.1%).
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 475 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 432 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-5
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
5 Question 2: Did you consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when you chose your home?
A majority of respondents ( 57.6%) did consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when they chose their home. A smaller percentage (30.6%) did not consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home. And smaller proportions either could not remember (3.5%) or did not have an option (8.3%) of considering the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.
Spanish survey results:
Of the four options, Spanish respondents responded with only two types of responses. A majority of respondents ( 66.7%) did not consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when they chose their home.
A smaller percentage (33.3%) did consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.
Observation: The Spanish survey responses mark a reversal from the English-speaking surveys, where a vast majority did consider hazard risks, suggesting outreach or additional guidance in home purchasing for Spanish-speakers may be helpful.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 476 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 433 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-6
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 6
Question 3: Do you believe your property is at risk from a natural disaster? Most respondents answered yes to this question, 73.2%, and only 26.8% answered no.
Spanish survey results:
Most respondents answered yes to this question, 55.6% as opposed to only 44.4% who answered no.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 6
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 477 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 434 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-7
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
7 Question 4: Which of the following types of hazard events have you or someone in your household experienced at your current home? The below list summarizes the top responses for the type of hazard events respondents or household members have experienced, along with the percentage of total respondents:
▪Severe weather -summer (high heat, high wind) (59.6%)
▪Pandemic (55.4%)
▪Earthquake (51.1%)
▪Wildfire (44.1%)
▪Drought (Agricultural or domestic) (38.4%)
▪Severe weather -winter (extremely low temperatures, hard freezes) (12.4%) ▪Flooding (including from a river, local drainage & high groundwater levels) (11.3%) ▪None of the above (7.7%)
▪Geohazard (landslide, erosion, mudslide, soil expansion/collapse) (6.3%) ▪Climate Change (sea level rise) (4.1%)
▪Agricultural disaster (1.2%)
▪Dam failure (1.2%)
Respondents also replied with their own unique natural hazard concerns regarding which hazards they had experienced at their current home. Some trends from these responses included: the reduced air quality from local wildfires, extended power outages, and biosolid waste hazards.
Spanish survey results:
The below list includes the percentage of respondents who indicated that they have experienced the following hazards at their current home.
▪Pandemic (77.8%)
▪Severe weather -summer (high heat, high wind) (66.7%)
▪Flooding (including from a river, local drainage & high groundwater levels) (44.4%) ▪Wildfire (44.4%)
▪Drought (Agricultural or domestic) (44.4%)
▪Severe weather -winter (extremely low temperatures, hard freezes) (44.4%) ▪Earthquake (11.1%)
▪Dam failure (11.1%)
▪Climate Change (sea level rise) (11.1%)
▪None of the above (11.1%)
Observation: Survey results included a higher-than-anticipated response rate for air quality concerns and extended power outages, both of which may be emphasized to a higher degree in the MJHMP.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 7
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 478 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 435 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-8
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 8
Question 5: Do you think you are well informed about the dangers of natural hazards in this area?
The three options for answering this question were yes, no, and somewhat. Most respondents (47.7%) responded that they are well informed. About a third (38.4%) said no, they are not well informed, and 13.9% said they were somewhat well informed.
Spanish survey results:
Most Spanish speaking respondents answered no to this question (55.6%). A minority answered yes (44.4%), that they are well informed.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 8
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 479 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 436 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-9
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
9 Question 6: What actions have you taken for your home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters?
The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who have taken the following actions for their home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters. ▪Purchased homeowners/renters insurance (86.7%)
▪Installed low flow water devices for showers, faucets, and toilets (53.6%) ▪Reduced vegetation around home for wildfire defense (48.4%) ▪Installed drought tolerant plants or landscaping (47.5%) ▪Installed alternate power supply; generators, battery/solar back up (25.6%) ▪Installed fire resistant siding and roofing for wildfire defense (19.8%) ▪Flood-proofing measures (elevating furnace, water heaters, electric panels) (14.8%) ▪Asked landlord to conduct any of the above mitigation measures (4.8%) ▪Installed basement flood proofing measures (sump pumps, waterproof paint/barriers) (3.4%) Respondents also replied with their own unique answers. Some highlights include installing retention walls to prevent slope failure, purchasing earthquake insurance, and improving the drainage systems around their property.
Spanish survey results:
The list below reflects the percentage of respondents to the Spanish survey who have taken the following actions for their home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters.
▪Purchased homeowners/renters insurance (55.6%)
▪Reduced vegetation around home for wildfire defense (22.2%) ▪Installed alternate power supply; generators, battery/solar back up (22.2%) ▪Installed drought tolerant plants or landscaping (22.2%) ▪Flood-proofing measures (elevating furnace, water heaters, electric panels) (11.1%) ▪Installed fire resistant siding and roofing for wildfire defense (11.1%) ▪Other (11.1%)
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 9
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 480 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 437 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-10
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 10
Question 7: Which of the following incentives would encourage you to protect your home to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards? The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who indicated that the following incentives would encourage them to protect their homes to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards:
▪Rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (69.6%) ▪Insurance premium discounts (64.4%)
▪Building permit fee waiver (47.4%)
▪Home improvement cost-share grants (43.3%)
▪Labor assistance; for renters and homeowners (40%)
▪Low interest home improvement loans (38.7%)
▪Technical assistance: for renters and homeowners (35%) Respondents also replied with their own unique answers for which incentives would encourage them to protect their home to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards. Some noteworthy highlights include: better notification of natural hazard risks and more informational meetings or webinars, first time homeowners assistance, disability code assistance programs, and lower insurance costs.
Spanish survey results:
The list below reflects the percentage of Spanish-speaking respondents who indicated that the following incentives would encourage them to protect their homes to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards:
▪Rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (77.8%) ▪Technical assistance: for renters and homeowners (66.7%) ▪Low interest home improvement loans (55.6%)
▪Insurance premium discounts (55.6%)
▪Building permit fee waiver (55.6%)
▪Home improvement cost-share grants (33.3%)
▪Labor assistance; for renters and homeowners (33.3%)
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 10
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 481 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 438 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-11
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
11 Question 8: Which of the following mitigation projects do you believe local government agencies should focus on to reduce disruptions of services and to strengthen the community?
The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who selected various mitigation actions on which local governments should focus to reduce disruptions of services and to strengthen the community. ▪Work on improving the damage resistance of utilities (79.3%) ▪Ensure that emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center and communications towers have backup power generators (62.6%)
▪Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities such as police, fire, emergency medical services, hospitals, schools, etc. (60.5%)
▪Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (60%) ▪Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (58.6%) ▪Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (56.9%) ▪Retrofit or upgrade drainage systems (51%)
▪Assist vulnerable property owners with securing funding to mitigate impacts to their property(s) (50.9%)
▪Provide better information about hazard risk and high-hazard areas (49.5%) ▪Strengthen codes, ordinances, and plans (33.3%)
Respondents also replied with their own unique answers for which mitigation projects local governments should prioritize. Highlights include:
▪improve early warning systems, ▪replant with endemic plant species, ▪increase fire response capacity, ▪provide more funding for earthquake retrofits, ▪reduce vegetative fuel, ▪develop better communication tools, and ▪increase how well-informed residents are, ▪develop community wildfire protection plans. ▪increase pandemic resilience,
Spanish survey results:
The list below reflects the percentage of Spanish speaking respondents who selected various mitigation actions on which local governments should focus.
▪Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities such as police, fire, emergency medical services, hospitals, schools, etc. (88.9%)
▪Retrofit or upgrade drainage systems (77.8%)
▪Work on improving the damage resistance of utilities (77.8%) ▪Strengthen codes, ordinances, and plans (77.8%)
▪Provide better information about hazard risk and high-hazard areas (77.8%) ▪Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (77.8%) ▪Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (66.7%) Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 11
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 482 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 439 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-12
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 12
▪Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (66.7%) ▪Assist vulnerable property owners with securing funding to mitigate impacts to their property(s) (66.7%)
▪Ensure that emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center and communications towers have backup power generators (55.6%)
Additional Questions and Comments from Respondents
At the end of the survey, respondents were able to provide any additional questions or comments that they had regarding hazard mitigation and community protection against natural disasters. There were 334 different responses. These responses included compliments, questions, and comments indicating recommendations and challenges to mitigation. Below is a representative list of many comments, organized by theme. These themes include Wildfire, Climate Change, All Hazards, Flood, Earthquake, and Communication.
Wildfire
▪Fire departments need more staff, money, and resources to better protect communities. ▪Would like more education about preventing loss of life & structures during wildfires; would like to see more emphasis on prevention of wildfires in our communities. o Including more natural fire prevention such as brush clearing and goats in Fairfield/ Vacaville
▪Better evacuation plans and exit roads and temporary housing options in the case of a wildfire evacuation.
▪County grants to reopen fire station in Glen Cove.
▪Have Caltrans set K rails or mitigate fire danger at toll plaza, the source of most fires in South Vallejo. ▪Help reduce homelessness to help prevent the brush fires. ▪Fighting a fire is extremely difficult when PG&E turns off power to our water pumps. ▪Improve forest management, harden structures for fire, improve communications with the public, create evacuation plans, conduct county-wide drills for various disasters, and coordinate with Napa County on installing wildfire sensing technology.
▪Hazard mitigation should also include code enforcement violations. Code violations that increase hazards should be identified and addressed. There should also be assistance to deal with these, like free fire debris removal, free green waste pickup.
▪There is a potentially large volunteer community of hikers, campers, hunters, etc. that would help with fire prevention efforts in parks and recreation areas of the county. ▪Limit PG&E rolling blackouts during fire season. Form community groups to assist with welfare checks on elderly, handicapped and homeless. The emergency services are stretched too thin to expect them to check on needy folks.
▪My biggest concern after the 2020 wildfires is another fire season. Here during Fairfield's dry season, we are a tinderbox waiting for a spark. Last fall all it took was a gender reveal party (it was a boy) to set the town ablaze for a month.
▪Audit PG&E look at power lines in the country where fire danger is more prevalent.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 12
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 483 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 440 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.3-13
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
13 Climate Change
▪I have zero info from the city or county about any mitigation efforts re: climate change, nor expected impacts to Solano County. Especially after last summer, we need a lot more info about fire dangers to the county.
▪Climate change legislation to protect from wildfires.
▪Sea rise concerns due to global warming are a future concern in Suisun City. Why is my home in a AE flood zone and a couple of homes in my neighborhood have received exemptions from maintaining flood insurance.
▪Drought due to climate change is a bigger long term threat than flooding. Do not ignore it. ▪The weather each year is getting more & more unpredictable & we need to plan accordingly. Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.
▪Provide reports on sea level rise and climate change.
All Hazards
▪We are on 3 fault lines with gas lines all over Cordelia. We all need to be prepared in case of earthquake, flooding, and fires.
▪Solano needs a master list of emergency resources categorized by type of help needed: housing, emergency grants, emergency water, sewer, and power; where to go for food and other essentials. ▪Don’t wait for the emergency.
▪Bring back CERT team program, have a country awareness day that’s like a street fair with some vendors to promote emergency preparation mitigation and education. We are due for a big earthquake in California; you just really never know when! Flood
▪Cut and clean away vegetation and debris from Sweeney Creek. This creek is a known problem and floods too often causing extensive damage to property and homes. Find a solution please. ▪I don’t think people appreciate how much flood risk they have. More education would be good! ▪In the Fairfield area, improvements to storm drainage should be made to eliminate flooding of I-80 during heavy rain events. This involves improvements in the County and Fairfield. ▪Very concerned about flooding on I-80 and the potential for gridlock. ▪Canals / drainage streams should be cleared of weeds each spring after the rains. They are choked with weeds. Water backs up and has nowhere to go. Animals live in the weeds. I would rather have a raccoon or possum in my yard than a flooded house.
Earthquake
▪In our area there is earthquake risk and flood risk, but many of my neighbors have no idea where local faults are, nor are they aware of flood risk from the slough. We need more community education to spread the word.
▪I'm worried about maintaining order and the supply chain of critical supplies post-earthquake.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 13
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 484 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 441 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.3-14
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 14
▪Based on homeowners and earthquake insurance policy rates in this area (i.e. low rates), I feel fortunate to live in an area that is not as subject to natural disasters as other cities in our region. ▪I’m involved in earthquake early warning and I can’t afford earthquake insurance. Would be nice if it were affordable.
Communication
▪Better communication during disasters. The communication to evacuate during the last wildfire was quick (via text) but I was not told I could go home until a friend told me that VVPD posted it via social media (which I didn’t have)/ no text.
▪City should have emergency sirens to warn people to evacuate. Police unable to hit all the neighborhoods to warn sleeping people of approaching fires. ▪During the LNU complex fire here in Vacaville, communications with OES, fire, sheriffs and law enforcement were poor at best. There has to be a better system to communicate immediate risk and need for evacuation.
▪Encourage and provide advice for local neighborhoods to support one another during one of these events. As an example, during the LNU fire complex last year, many neighbors stayed home and defended neighbor's houses. Like Neighborhood watch concept. ▪In our are there is earthquake risk and flood risk, but many of my neighbors have no idea where local faults are, nor are they aware of flood risk from the slough. We need more community education to spread the word.
▪Improve education on single source of most updated information in a disaster. Too much social media and apps to sift through - use the text notifications more and communicate what site to go to. ▪More public awareness of possible types of emergencies, what are the plans during an emergency, notification types, do we have a by area evacuation plan. Maybe quarterly zoom classes on emergency preparedness and evacuations.
▪Clearly define and communicate evacuation locations.
▪Communication is good but needs to be reliably updated on a timely basis. ▪We need a better, more effective emergency alert system. ▪Better ways to communicate info to Hispanic community.
Survey Summary 6/2/2021
Solano Survey Summary 14
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 485 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 442 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Mitigation Strategy
Prioritization Process
Documentation
Appendix B.4
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 486 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 443 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 487 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 444 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.4-1
MAST Priority Field
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 488 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 445 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 489 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 446 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
Website Documentation
Appendix B.5
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 490 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 447 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 491 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 448 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.5-1
Executive Summary
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 492 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 449 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.5-2
Public Survey
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 493 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 450 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.5-3
Mitigation at Home
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 494 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 451 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.5-4
Draft Documents
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 495 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 452 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.5-5
Meetings
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 496 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 453 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.5-6
Document Upload
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 497 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 454 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.5-7
Planning Process Library
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 498 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 455 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.5-8
POC App
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 499 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 456 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
B.5-9
MAST App
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 500 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 457 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN B.5-10
RAMP App
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 501 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 458 of 460
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
C-1
C
Appendix C. Climate Vulnerability Assessment (CVA)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 502 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 459 of 460
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN C-2
FINAL for adoption
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Packet Page 503 of 1095Attachment 2 Page 460 of 460
i
SECTION 3
JURISDICTIONAL ANNEX:
City of Fairfield
Packet Page 504 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 1 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
ii
INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 505 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 2 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
iii
Solano County
Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
CITY OF FAIRFIELD (FF.)
Municipal Annex
Adoption Resolution ....................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Section 3. City of Fairfield ........................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Planning Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.3 What’s New .................................................................................................................................................................................................3-2
3.4 Risk Assessment ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3-3 Hazard Screening Criteria .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3-3 Hazard Risk Ranking ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3-5 Vulnerability Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST) ..................................................................................................................................................... 3-23
3.5 Mitigation Strategy .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3-24 Capabilities & Adaptive Capacity Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 3-24 Mitigation Actions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3-30
List of Figures
Figure 3-1: Fairfield ........................................................................................................................................................................................3-2 Figure 3-2: City of Fairfield Risk Assessment..................................................................................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3-3: Fairfield - Wildfire Risk Exposure Snapshot ................................................................................................................3-2 Figure 3-4: Fairfield- Mean Fire Return Interval ............................................................................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3-5: Fairfield - FEMA Flood Risk Exposure Snapshot ...................................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-6: Fairfield – DWR Best Available Mapping for Flooding ............................................................................................ 3-7 Figure 3-7: Fairfield - Hayward Rodger's Creek EQ Scenario (M7.1) Snapshot ......................................................................3-8 Figure 3-8: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley EQ Scenario (M6.8) Snapshot ........................................................................ 3-10 Figure 3-9: Fairfield - Liquefaction Potential .................................................................................................................................... 3-12 Figure 3-10: Fairfield - July Max Temp ................................................................................................................................................ 3-13 Figure 3-11: Fairfield - Average Precipitation .................................................................................................................................... 3-14 Figure 3-12: Fairfield - Wind Speed ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-15 Figure 3-13: Fairfield - RCP Comparison ............................................................................................................................................. 3-16 Figure 3-14: Fairfield - Sea Level Rise Exposure Snapshot ......................................................................................................... 3-17 FINAL for adoption Packet Page 506 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 3 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
iv
Figure 3-15: Guidance for Problem Statements ................................................................................................................................ 3-21 Figure 3-16: Mitigation Action Key ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-30
List of Tables
Table 3-1: Planning Committee Members ............................................................................................................................................ 3-1 Table 3-2: County-Wide Hazard Prioritization................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Table 3-3: City Document Review Crosswalk ..................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Table 3-4: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 100YR Flood ............................................................................................. 3-5 Table 3-5: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 500 YR Flood ............................................................................................3-6 Table 3-6: Fairfield - Hayward Rogers Creek Damage Estimate Summaries .........................................................................3-9 Table 3-7: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley Damage Estimate Summaries......................................................................... 3-11 Table 3-8: NFIP Status Table .................................................................................................................................................................. 3-20 Table 3-9: Problem Statements ............................................................................................................................................................... 3-21 Table 3-10: Planning and Regulatory Capabilities .......................................................................................................................... 3-25 Table 3-11: Administrative and Technical Capabilities ................................................................................................................ 3-27 Table 3-12: Financial Capabilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 3-28 Table 3-13: Education and Outreach Capabilities ........................................................................................................................... 3-29 Table 3-14: City of Fairfield Mitigation Actions ................................................................................................................................ 3-31
Adoption Resolution
To comply with DMA 2000, the City of Fairfield has officially adopted this Solano County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP), Volume 1, and its jurisdictional annex. The adoption of the MJHMP recognizes the City’s commitment to reducing the impacts of natural hazards. See included adoption resolution.
ADOPTION RECORD TO BE INSERTED UPON COMPLETION.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 507 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 4 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-1
Section 3. City of Fairfield
3.1 Purpose
This Annex details the hazard mitigation planning elements specific to the City of Fairfield. This Annex is not intended to be a standalone document but appends to and supplements the information contained in the umbrella plan document. As such, all sections of the umbrella plan, including the planning process and other procedural requirements apply to and were met by the City of Fairfield. This Annex provides additional information specific to the City of Fairfield, with a focus on providing additional details on the planning process, risk assessment, and mitigation strategy for this community.
Hazard Mitigation Plan Points of Contact
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
John Sturdee, Deputy Chief
City of Fairfield
1200 Kentucky Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
Telephone: (707) 436-7228
e-mail: [email protected]
Steven Conti, Fire Marshal
City of Fairfield
1200 Kentucky Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
Telephone: (707) 428-7550
e-mail: [email protected]
3.2 Planning Methodology
The City of Fairfield followed the planning process detailed in Volume 1, Section 3, including participating in the County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC) and Steering Committee and formulating their own internal planning team to support the broader planning process. Internal planning participants, their positions, and how they participated in the planning process are shown in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Planning Committee Members
Planning Committee Members Department
John Sturdee Battalion Fire Chief
Steven Conti Fire Marshal
Amy Kreimeier Senior Planner
Bill Way Communications Manager
Brian Coy Building Inspector
David Gassaway Ast. City Manager & Community Development Deanna Cantrell Chief of Police
Brad Collins Operations Captain
Jorge Barrera Sr. Economic Development Project Manager Stefan Chatwin City Manager
Mike Gray Public Works Operations Superintendent
Ryan Panganiban Ast. Public Works Director
George Shimboff Water Distribution Manager
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 508 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 5 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-2
Figure 3-1: Fairfield
3.3 What’s New
The City of Fairfield has been making improvements toward reducing natural hazard risks to life and property since the existing MJHMP was adopted.
The City reevaluated previous mitigation actions, including considerations of progress made on mitigation efforts, and retained them as pending or ongoing; no tables for completed or cancelled mitigation actions are included. Ongoing and pending mitigation actions are described in Table 3-14.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 509 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 6 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-3
Success Story: New Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). The City created a Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD) for paradise valley referred to as the Paradise Valley Maintenance and Monitoring District (PVMMD). The district was established by the City of Fairfield City Council in 2010. The District was created to monitor, prevent, and mitigate geologic hazards (a.k.a. slope failure) in the Paradise Valley.
Success Story: EOC Relocation. The City relocated their Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to the Fire Administration Building, enhancing the ability for the center to withstand earthquakes.
3.4 Risk Assessment
The intent of this section is to profile the City of Fairfield’s hazards and assess the City’s vulnerabilities, distinct from that of the County wide planning area. The hazard profiles in Volume 1 discuss overall impacts to the planning area and describes the hazard problem description, hazard extent, magnitude/severity, previous occurrences of hazard events and the likelihood of future occurrences. For more information o n Risk Assessment Methodologies, see Vol. 1 and Appendix A.
Hazard Screening Criteria
Planning Team members from each participating jurisdiction collectively discussed which hazards should be profiled in the Plan and which should not. The results of that discussion can be found in Table 3-2.
Detailed hazard profiles of the most significant County wide hazards are described in Section 4 of Volume 1.
The Planning Team reviewed previously prepared hazard mitigation plans and other relevant documents to determine the realm of natural hazards that have the potential to affect the City of Fairfield. Table 3-3 provides a crosswalk of hazards identified in Vol. 1 of this plan, the City of Fairfield General Plan, and 2018 California State Hazard Mitigation Plan. The crosswalk was used to develop a preliminary hazards list, providing a framework for the Planning Team members to evaluate which hazards were truly relevant to the City of Fairfield and which ones were not. Section 3.4.2 below describes the hazard risk ranking process that was performed by the planning team which prioritized hazards that are specifically relevant to the City of Fairfield.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 510 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 7 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-4
Table 3-2: County-Wide Hazard Prioritization
Hazard Type Explanation
Climate Change High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
Dam/ Levee failure
Dam failure is possible in Solano County but is best addressed in other plans, specifically Emergency Action Plans for high hazard dams affecting Solano County.
Drought High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
Earthquake/ Geologic Hazards High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
Flood High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
Hazardous Material While hazardous materials can release and impact the County, there are better avenues to address this hazard outside this plan.
High Winds/ Straight Line Winds High priority county-wide, profiled as part of Extreme Weather.
Insect Hazards While hazardous insects exist in Solano County, this was not considered a priority and is not profiled in this plan.
Pandemic Disease While pandemic disease can impact the County, there are better avenues to address this hazard outside this plan.
Extreme Weather, including: High priority county-wide for high wind, heavy rain, and high heat.
Extreme Heat Profiled as part of Extreme Weather.
Hail Hail events are rare and not considered a priority.
High Wind Profiled as part of Extreme Weather.
Heavy Rain Profiled as part of Extreme Weather.
Fog Fog events are rare and are not considered a priority.
Lightning Not a priority as an extreme weather event; discussed as source of wildfire.
Severe Thunderstorm Severe thunderstorms were not identified as a priority in this plan.
Winter Storm / Extreme Cold/ Freeze Events Winter storms are rare in Solano County and not identified as a priority for this plan.
Slope Failure High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
Soil Hazards
While limited soil hazards exist in Solano County (erosion and shifting soils), these are not prioritized in this plan. Erosion discussed under flood hazard.
Terrorism/Human Caused Threats
While terrorism is certainly a threat to the County and participating jurisdictions, it is best addressed in other plans as this HMP does not address human-caused threats.
Tornado Impacts to the County from tornados are extremely unlikely, if any.
Volcanic Activity Due to distance from volcanoes and the limited chance of an eruption, this hazard was not identified as a priority.
Wildfire High priority county-wide, profiled hazard.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 511 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 8 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-5
Table 3-3: City Document Review Crosswalk
Hazards
2002 Fairfield
General Plan
2011
Fairfield HMP
2014 Solano County
HMP
2018 California State
HMP
Agricultural Pests ■
Climate Change
■ ■
Dam Failure
■ ■ ■
Drought ■ ■ ■
Earthquake ■ ■ ■ ■
Flood ■ ■ ■ ■
Landslide
■ ■ ■
Levee Failure ■
Manmade Hazards ■ ■
Pandemic Disease ■
Sea Level Rise ■ ■
Severe Weather ■ ■ ■
Soil Hazards
■ ■
Terrorism & Tech
Hazards
■ ■
Tsunami ■ ■
Volcano ■
Wildfire ■ ■ ■ ■
Hazard Risk Ranking
The City of Fairfield’s Planning Team used the same hazard prioritization process as the Solano County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee. This process is described in detail in Section 4.3.1 of Vol. 1. Figure 3-2 displays the results of the hazard risk ranking exercise that was performed by the Planning Team. The Planning Team chose to assess the City of Fairfield’s vulnerability to the following hazards:
All these hazards have been profiled in Vol. 1 of this document. The purpose of this annex to specifically address the City of Fairfield’s vulnerability to these specifically-identified hazards.
Vulnerability Assessment
Assessing vulnerabilities exposes the unique characteristics of individual hazards and begins the process of narrowing down which areas within the City of Fairfield are vulnerable to specific hazard events. The vulnerability assessment considered unique local knowledge of hazards and impacts and a GIS overlaying method for examining such vulnerabilities more in depth. Using these methods, participating jurisdictions estimated vulnerable populations, infrastructure, and potential losses from hazards. ▪ Wildfire ▪ Extreme Weather (high wind, heavy rain, and high heat) ▪ Flood ▪ Climate Change
▪ Earthquake
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 512 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 9 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-6
3.4.3.1 Risk Assessment
Each participating jurisdiction developed a risk matrix that assessed the probability and impact of various hazards within the jurisdiction. Figure 3-2 is the jurisdiction’s risk assessment, which was completed in part using the web based and interactive Risk Assessment Mapping Platform (RAMP), accessed via the project website at www.mitigatehazards.com . RAMP allows interactive discovery of robust risk, vulnerability, and exposure data developed especially for Solano County. RAMP is a mapping platform built specifically for mitigation planning. It displays County/jurisdiction facilities and buildings overlaid with natural hazards layers to bring interactivity and individual discovery to the GIS analysis performed for the MJHMP. See Vol. 1 for a detailed description of RAMP. The Planning Team used RAMP in meetings and as needed to understand vulnerabilities to the City of Fairfield. Users interactively filter facilities and buildings by natural hazard zones and/or construction characteristics. The City of Fairfield also conducted a more detailed climate vulnerability assessment, included as Appendix A to this annex. The climate vulnerability assessment analyzed climate-related vulnerabilities by considering the impact from the climate vulnerability and the community’s adaptive capacity to respond to the particular vulnerability.
3.4.3.2 Exposure Maps and Damage Estimation Tables
The included snapshot maps and damage estimation tables illustrate the City of Fairfield’s vulnerability to specific hazards. Based on the risk assessment, the snapshot maps focus on those hazards prioritized by the jurisdiction. These maps helped the Planning Team understand the exposure of population, parcels, and critical infrastructure to specific hazards. Each map contains an exposure summary that displays the percent of the population, the improvement and content value of parcels, and the amount of critical infrastructure that is exposed to each respective hazard. For flood and earthquake, detailed damage estimations were conducted through FEMA’s Hazus software and are shown in tabular form. Additional mapping is also included. Figures and tables include:
▪ Figure 3-3: Fairfield - Wildfire Risk Exposure
▪ Figure 3-4: Fairfield- Mean Fire Return Interval
▪ Figure 3-5: Fairfield - FEMA Flood Risk Exposure
▪ Table 3-4: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 100YR Flood ▪ Table 3-5: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 500 YR Flood ▪ Figure 3-6: Fairfield – DWR Best Available Mapping for Flooding ▪ Figure 3-7: Fairfield - Hayward Rodger's Creek EQ Scenario (M7.1) ▪ Table 3-6: Fairfield - Hayward Rogers Creek Damage Estimate Summaries ▪ Figure 3-8: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley EQ Scenario (M6.8) ▪ Table 3-7: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley Damage Estimate Summaries ▪ Figure 3-9: Fairfield - Liquefaction Potential
▪ Figure 3-10: Fairfield - July Max Temp
▪ Figure 3-11: Fairfield - Average Precipitation
▪ Figure 3-12: Fairfield - Wind Speed
▪ Figure 3-13: Fairfield - RCP Comparison
▪ Figure 3-14: Fairfield - Sea Level Rise Exposure
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 513 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 10 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-1
Figure 3-2: City of Fairfield Risk Assessment
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 514 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 11 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-2
Figure 3-3: Fairfield - Wildfire Risk Exposure Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 515 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 12 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-3
Figure 3-4: Fairfield- Mean Fire Return Interval
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 516 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 13 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-4
Figure 3-5: Fairfield - FEMA Flood Risk Exposure Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 517 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 14 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-5
Table 3-4: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 100YR Flood Building Type
Building
Damage ($)
Building
Damage
(% of total loss)
Content
Damage ($)
Content
Damage
(% of total
loss)
Total Damage
($)
Proportion
of Loss (%)
Agriculture $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0%
Commercial $611,896 0.7% $3,947,241 4.8% $4,559,137 6%
Education* $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0%
Emergency $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0%
Government $588 0.0% $90 0.0% $679 0%
Industrial $2,363,576 2.9% $64,348 0.1% $2,427,924 3%
Religion $39,743 0.0% $278,278 0.3% $318,021 0%
Residential $56,246,359 68.9% $18,073,864 22.1% $74,320,223 91% Total $59,262,162 73% $22,363,822 27% $81,625,983
*School district asset information not available during time of Hazus analysis.
Note: Total Inventory Values
1 - Building Replacement Costs = $3,773,922,295
2 - Content Replacement Costs = $2,667,166,517
3 - Total Value = $6,441,088,812
$0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 Agriculture
Commercial
Education
Emergency
Government
Industrial
Religion
Residential
Content Damage ($)Building Damage ($)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 518 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 15 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-6
Table 3-5: Fairfield - Damage Estimate Summaries, 500 YR Flood Building Type
Building
Damage ($)
Building
Damage
(% of total
loss)
Content
Damage ($)
Content
Damage
(% of total
loss)
Total Damage
($)
Proportion
of Loss (%)
Agriculture $0 0.0% $166 0.0% $166 0%
Commercial $1,366,801 0.8% $4,290,848 2.4% $5,657,650 3% Education* $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0%
Emergency $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0%
Government $12,178 0.0% $15,134 0.0% $27,312 0%
Industrial $965,167 0.5% $1,239,414 0.7% $2,204,581 1%
Religion $23,861 0.0% $162,006 0.1% $185,867 0%
Residential $125,501,331 69.7% $46,518,495 25.8% $172,019,826 96% Total $127,869,338 71% $52,226,065 29% $180,095,403
*School district asset information not available during time of Hazus analysis.
Note: Total Inventory Values
1 - Building Replacement Costs = $3,773,922,295
2 - Content Replacement Costs = $2,667,166,517
3 - Total Value = $6,441,088,812
$0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000 $100,000,000 $120,000,000 $140,000,000 Agriculture
Commercial
Education
Emergency
Government
Industrial
Religion
Residential
Content Damage ($)Building Damage ($)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 519 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 16 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-7
Figure 3-6: Fairfield – DWR Best Available Mapping for Flooding
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 520 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 17 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-8
Figure 3-7: Fairfield - Hayward Rodger's Creek EQ Scenario (M7.1) Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 521 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 18 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-9
Table 3-6: Fairfield - Hayward Rogers Creek Damage Estimate Summaries Building
Type
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Slight”
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Moderate”
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Extensive”
Average
Economic
Loss for Each
Building
Category
Sum of
Economic
Loss
Proportion of
Loss (%)
Agriculture 22% 9% 1% $1,264 $2,527 0%
Commercial 12% 3% 0% $130,276 $95,622,419 33%
Education* 21% 8% 1% $32,744 $130,976 0%
Emergency 8% 2% 0% $43,130 $388,174 0%
Government 8% 2% 0% $51,113 $4,855,755 2%
Industrial 22% 7% 1% $215,320 $54,475,966 19%
Religion 8% 1% 0% $25,566 $1,201,597 0%
Residential 7% 1% 0% $4,371 $129,319,424 45%
Total $285,996,838
*School district asset information not available during time of Hazus analysis.
Note: Total Inventory Values
1 - Building Replacement Costs = $3,773,922,295
2 - Content Replacement Costs = $2,667,166,517
3 - Total Value = $6,441,088,812
$0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000
Agriculture
Commercial
Education
Emergency
Government
Industrial
Religion
Residential
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 522 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 19 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-10
Figure 3-8: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley EQ Scenario (M6.8) Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 523 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 20 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-11
Table 3-7: Fairfield - Concord Green Valley Damage Estimate Summaries Building
Type
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Slight”
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Moderate”
Average of
Potential
Damage to
Exceed
“Extensive”
Average
Economic
Loss for Each
Building
Category
Sum of
Economic
Loss
Proportion of
Loss (%)
Agriculture 65% 48% 21% $4,158 $8,315 0%
Commercial 42% 15% 3% $687,414 $504,561,844 31%
Education* 56% 30% 6% $140,778 $563,112 0%
Emergency 34% 13% 3% $258,116 $2,323,048 0%
Government 34% 11% 2% $315,429 $29,965,711 2%
Industrial 60% 34% 10% $929,864 $235,255,509 15%
Religion 35% 10% 1% $147,927 $6,952,590 0%
Residential 34% 6% 0% $28,059 $830,223,818 52%
Total $1,609,853,946
*School district asset information not available during time of Hazus analysis.
Note: Total Inventory Values
1 - Building Replacement Costs = $3,773,922,295
2 - Content Replacement Costs = $2,667,166,517
3 - Total Value = $6,441,088,812
$0 $200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000 $1,000,000,000 Agriculture
Commercial
Education
Emergency
Government
Industrial
Religion
Residential
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 524 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 21 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-12
Figure 3-9: Fairfield - Liquefaction Potential
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 525 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 22 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-13
Figure 3-10: Fairfield - July Max Temp
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 526 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 23 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-14
Figure 3-11: Fairfield - Average Precipitation
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 527 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 24 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-15
Figure 3-12: Fairfield - Wind Speed
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 528 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 25 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-16
Figure 3-13: Fairfield - RCP Comparison
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 529 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 26 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-17
Figure 3-14: Fairfield - Sea Level Rise Exposure Snapshot
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 530 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 27 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-18
3.4.3.3 Past and Future Development
The City of Fairfield is a general law city that crafts its own development regulations and is subject to State law. Future development is subject to compliance with state and local planning, zoning, subdivision, and architecture laws.
The City of Fairfield’s General Plan (GP) establishes long-range development policies. The GP is designed to help the City address issues related to land use, circulation (traffic), housing, open space, conservation, noise, and safety. The Land Use portion of the plan helps guide the City in determining the location of future development(s), including possible future annexation. In addition to the GP, the City has other plans that guide development in specific areas, including specific plans, policy plans, and master plans. These plans help to shape future development and dictate the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI). One of the central functions in these planning documents is to decrease risk of impact from natural hazards.
Development since Previous HMP
The City considered its growth since the last HMP and determined it had completed several significant mitigation activities and substantially decreased its vulnerability to hazards. The City created a Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD) for paradise valley referred to as the Paradise Valley Maintenance and Monitoring District (PVMMD) and developed fuel breaks on the Western edge of the City. The City also relocated their Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to the Fire Administration Building enhancing the ability to withstand earthquakes. This HMP Annex has been revised to reflect this substantial change in past development and continues to focus on avenues to better mitigate impacts from problematic past development.
Future Development
City of Fairfield is required to update building codes to meet the minimum standards to those required in the California Building Code last updated in 2019. California Building Codes provide som e of the safest construction standards in the world and are meant to reduce risk to occupants from high wind, seismic activity, landslides, flood, wildfire, and other natural hazards. In addition to California minimum develop standards, all jurisdictions belong to the NFIP, and all development must meet minimum flood protection standards set forth by FEMA. See Section 4.3.5 of Volume 1 for more information about past and future development in Solano County.
As the General Plan is updated and incorporates information from this HMP, City of Fairfield staff are continually improving hazard information through these hazard mitigation plan updates. With this 2020 update, improved online mapping about natural hazards available on RAMP will inform those responsible for future development to make better decisions where and how future development occurs.
City of Fairfield reviewed its general plans under the capability assessments undertaken for this hazard mitigation plan. See Section 3.5.1. Deficiencies revealed by these reviews are identified as mitigation actions to decrease risks to move beyond past trends.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 531 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 28 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-19
The City’s municipal codes includes regulations to mitigate the impa ct of hazards on new and existing development, including:
▪ Drainage and stormwater retention requirements,
▪ Steep slope restrictions for new development,
▪ Waterbody buffer requirements,
▪ Floodplain management regulations,
▪ Zoning that prevents development in hazardous areas of the community such as floodplains, landslide areas, the wildland-urban interface (WUI), or other known hazard areas, and ▪ Building codes that include the most up-to-date California Fire Code, seismic standards, and many other provisions crafted to protect new construction from hazard events.
Even in the event that limited development did occur within a hazard area, the municipal code should ensure impacts from a hazard event are mitigated and losses are minimal. If development does occur in hazard areas, evacuation and emergency planning should take into consideration the anticipated local impacts of the hazard event, including potential interrupted services or the elimination of access.
The anticipated growth in the City will not cause significant change in vulnerability to the City for identified priority hazards.
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
The NFIP makes federally backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in participating communities. FEMA has prepared a detailed Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Solano County and municipalities. The study presents water surface elevations for floods of various magnitudes, including the 1-percent annual chance flood and the 0.2-percent annual chance flood (the 500-YR flood). Base flood elevations and the boundaries of the 100- and 500-YR floodplains are shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), which are the principal tools for identifying the extent and location of the flood hazard. FIRMs are the most detailed and consistent data source available, and for many communities they represent the minimum area of oversight under their floodplain management program. See Section 4 of Volume 1 for general information on the NFIP.
The City of Fairfield has participated in the NFIP since 1984. The City of Fairfield is currently in good standing with the provisions of the NFIP. Compliance is monitored by FEMA regional staff and by the California Department of Water Resources under a contract with FEMA. Maintaining compliance under the NFIP is an important component of flood risk reduction. See Table 3-8 for more information on the City’s policies and historic flood insurance claims.
The City of Fairfield also participates in the NFIP Community Rating System (CRS). The City joined the program in 1992 and maintains a rating of 7. Residents purchasing flood insurance under the NFIP in CRS communities receive discounted premiums based on community actions to reduce flood risks. The CRS rating is based on the amount of flood reduction actions taken in the community.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 532 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 29 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-20
Table 3-8: NFIP Status Table
NFIP and CRS Status & Information
City of Fairfield
NFIP Status 07/05/84
CRS Class 7
Policies in Force 187
Policies in SFHA 59
Policies in non-SFHA 128
Total Claims Paid $1,096,946
Paid Losses 65
Repetitive Loss Properties 4
Severe Repetitive Loss Properties -
Repetitive Loss Payment by NFIP on Building $320,154
Repetitive Loss Payment by NFIP on Contents $88,873
Source: FEMA CIS 2021, OpenFEMA Data, FIMA RUL Solano County Note: Policies and claims provided directly from FEMA Region IX CIS Report (8/2021). Repetitive loss tabulations by jurisdiction derived via GIS-based intersect of data available at OpenFEMA Data ( https://www.fema.gov/about/openfema/data-sets) . Countywide data reported for entire county area including municipalities.The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 522a) restricts the release of certain types of data to the public. Flood insurance policy and claims data are included in the list of restricted information. FEMA can only release such data to state and local governments, and only if the data are used for floodplain management, mitigation, or research purposes.
Therefore, this plan does not identify the repetitive loss properties or include claims data for any individual property.
See Volume 1, Section 4.5 for more information on the NFIP
3.4.3.4 Identify Hazard Problem Statements
As part of the mitigation action identification process, the Planning Committee for each jurisdiction identified areas of concern (aka problem statements) for their respective facilities based on the risk assessment and vulnerability analysis, utilizing the RAMP mapping and static snapshot maps. Problem statements focused on the impact, victim, or threat that the hazard could create in the jurisdiction, as described in Figure 3-15. Identifying common issues and weaknesses through these problem statements assisted the Planning Committee in understanding the realm of resources needed for mitigation.
Jurisdiction problem statements are listed in Table 3-9.
The goal is to have at least one mitigation action for every problem statement. Projects or actions have been developed to mitigate each problem identified. See Table 3-14 for a full list of mitigation actions and corresponding problem statements that they address. Each problem statement is coded with a problem number for cross-referencing between Table 3-9 and Table 3-14.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 533 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 30 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-21
Figure 3-15: Guidance for Problem Statements
Table 3-9: Problem Statements
Problem
No.
Hazard
Type
Area of
Concern
Mitigation
Alternatives
Primary
Agency Problem Description Related MA
ps-AH-FF-
136
All Hazard Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness
City of
Fairfield
Train derailment could impact egress
within the jurisdiction.
ma-AH-FF-137
ps-FL-FF-
137
Flood Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness,
NRP - Natural
Resource
Protection
City of
Fairfield
Trash and debris from homeless
communities, dams up local creek
beds that causes flooding issues from
obstructed drainage paths.
ma-FL-FF-181
ps-FL-FF-
138
Flood/
Climate
Change
Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
King tide events are causing more
flooding and worsening with climate
change.
ma-FL-FF-138
▪Casualties
▪Property Damage
▪Business Interruption
▪Financial Loss
▪Environmental
Contamination
▪School Children in
High Hazard Areas
▪Care Facilities in High
Hazard Areas
▪Vulnerable Population
Exposed to Hazards
▪Increased Fuels due to
Drought
▪Hotter, Drier Climate
▪More Intense Storms
▪Impervious Surfaces =
Greater Runoff
▪Increases of Invasive
Species
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 534 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 31 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-22
Problem
No.
Hazard
Type
Area of
Concern
Mitigation
Alternatives
Primary
Agency Problem Description Related MA
ps-EW-FF-
139
Extreme
Weather
Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services
City of
Fairfield
High wind events have been causing
tree failure within the jurisdiction.
ma-EW-FF-139
ps-EW-FF-
140
Extreme
Weather
Impact ES - Emergency
Services
City of
Fairfield
Need for more generators throughout
the jurisdiction for cooling centers.
ma-EW-FF-
140
ps-EW-FF-
141
Extreme
Weather
Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection, NRP
- Natural
Resource
Protection, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
Heavy rain concerns with flooding in
downtown are exacerbated by climate
change.
ma-FL-FF-146,
ma-FL-FF-138,
ma-EW-FF-187
ps-WF -FF-
142
Wildfire Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services
City of
Fairfield
Fairfield has small pockets of
grasslands that need mitigation.
ma-WF-FF-141
ps-WF -FF-
143
Wildfire Victim PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services
City of
Fairfield
Small fires have been jumping into
people’s backyards causing enhanced
risk and potential structural damage.
ma-WF-FF-142
ps-WF -FF-
144
Wildfire Victim PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services
City of
Fairfield
Fairfield is working to bring better
coordination throughout the city to
ensure ongoing mitigation.
ma-WF-FF-
143, ma-WF-
FF-142
ps-EQ-FF-
145
Earthquake Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
The city has new and old subgrade and
above grade infrastructure with gravity
+ direct fed water systems. Tanks are
all secure however, major earthquakes
could significantly damage pumps,
storage tanks, and could cause small
flooding, resulting in water loss for the
fire district.
ma-EQ-FF-144
ps-EQ-FF-
146
Earthquake Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
City owned buildings are old and not
retrofitted to appropriate codes.
ma-EQ-FF-145
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 535 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 32 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-23
Problem
No.
Hazard
Type
Area of
Concern
Mitigation
Alternatives
Primary
Agency Problem Description Related MA
ps-EQ-FF-
147
Earthquake Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
The city has a Clorox chemical plant in
the 39th district, a major earthquake
could cause a hazardous material
spill(s).
ma-EQ-FF-182,
ma-EQ-FF-183
ps-EQ-FF-
148
Earthquake Impact PRV -
Prevention,
PPRO - Property
Protection,
PE&A - Public
Education &
Awareness, ES -
Emergency
Services, SP -
Structural
Projects
City of
Fairfield
The city has commercial storage
warehouses, that contain flammable
materials, Cordelia area, this causes a
secondary vulnerability with potential
fire hazards, because of a major
earthquake.
ma-EQ-FF-183
Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST)
As a living document, hazard problem statements and mitigation activities will be updated through a web interface application developed specifically for participating jurisdictions. The Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST) is accessible through mitigatehazards.com/SolanoHMP/.
MAST is a web-based interactive tool that enables multiple users to search, view, enter, and update mitigation actions, ideas or projects, and other information. MAST provides participating jurisdictions and plan reviewers (Cal OES/FEMA) access to valuable mitigation in formation that can be leveraged by future planning or other risk reduction efforts within the County. Participating jurisdictions can update the status of their mitigation projects throughout the planning lifecycle, and this web-based tool will improve participating jurisdiction’s ability to apply for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grant programs including initial grant application processes through Cal OES.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 536 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 33 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-24
3.5 Mitigation Strategy
The mitigation strategy is the guidebook to future hazard mitigatio n administration, capturing the key outcomes of the MJHMP planning process. The mitigation strategy is intended to reduce vulnerabilities outlined in the previous section (a.k.a. problem statements) with a prescription of policies and physical projects. These mitigation actions should be compatible with existing planning mechanisms and should outline specific roles and resources for implementation success.
Capabilities & Adaptive Capacity Assessment
This section examines the planning and regulatory, administrative, technical, financial, educational, and outreach capabilities to augment known issues and weaknesses from identified natural hazards.
Capabilities assessments in this Volume 1 and in Volume 2 include considerations of a community’s adaptive capacity for climate change, as outlined in Cal OES’ 2020 California Adaptation Planning Guide.
Adaptive capacity is a community or region’s existing ability to moderate climate change impacts.
Assessing adaptive capacity includes analysis of policies, plans, programs, funding, and staffing capacity.
The tables in this section explore various local planning mechanisms, administrative capacity, financial capabilities, and education and outreach initiatives. The columns in each table represent deeper dives into the following questions:
▪ Is the existing planning or regulatory mechanism used currently? (Column 1, Status) ▪ Has the HMP been integrated into the planning mechanism currently so that the named mechanism is currently used in HMP planning? (Column 2, Current Mitigation Use) ▪ Is there a future opportunity to expand, improve upon, and incorporate this 2020 HMP Update into the planning or regulatory mechanism? (Column 3, Future Opportunity)
The capabilities assessment is easily digestible and based on color coding to indicate which policies and plans are adequate, need improvement or in which the HMP could be integrated. Each table includes a legend that explain how each one of these questions are being answered according to the color indicated:
green, yellow, and orange.
For more information on the regulatory environment surrounding each hazard, see hazard-specific sections of Volume 1. Volume 1, Section 5.3.5 includes an extensive list of federal and state funding opportunities as well.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 537 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 34 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-25
3.5.1.1 Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
Table 3-10: Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Planning and Regulatory Capabilities
Construction and Future Development Regulations
Building Codes Green Green Yellow 2019 California Building Code Building Code Effectiveness Grading
Schedule (BCEGS) Rating N/A N/A N/A Unknown
Public Protection (ISO Class) Green Yellow Green 3
Hazard Related Development Standards
Green Yellow Green
Fire Protection, Development Requirements
(104.2.2); Establishment of Flood Plain
Development Permit (8A.4.1); Provisions for
Flood Hazard Reduction, Standards of
Construction (8A.5.1)
Hazard-Specific Ordinance
Green Yellow Yellow
Seismic Hazards Identification Program (5.3.6);
Provisions for flood hazard reduction (Article
V.)
Zoning Ordinance Green Yellow Yellow
Growth Management Ordinance Orange Orange N/A
Hazard Reduction Programs (Annually Conducted)
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) or
Plan Green Yellow Yellow
Erosion/Sediment Control Program Yellow Yellow Green Required for improvement plans Hazard-Related Public Outreach Program Yellow Yellow Green See Education & Outreach Capabilities for more specifics.
Stormwater Management Program
(Annual Inspections) Green Yellow Yellow Fairfield-Suisun Urban Runoff Management Program, Stormwater C.3 Guidebook (2012)
Seismic Safety Program (Non-structural
Inspections) Yellow Yellow Green
Earthquake Modernization Program
(Building Safety Inspections) Yellow Yellow Green
Hazard Plans
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 538 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 35 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-26
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
General Plan Safety Element Green Yellow Yellow Health and Safety Element 2004; Currently being updated
Noteworthy Area/ Specific Plan with
Hazard Focus Orange Orange Green
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP) Orange Orange Green
Wildfire Vulnerability Assessment Orange Orange Green
Urban or Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan Green Yellow Green 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Floodplain Management Plan Green Yellow Green See UWMP
Stormwater Management Plan Green Yellow Green 2019 Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan Ground Water Management Plan(s) Orange Orange Yellow
Open Space and Land Management
Plan(s) Green Green Green
General Plan Element, Parks Master Plan,
Rockville Hills Master Plan, participation in
Joint Powers Authority for open space issues.
Emergency Operations Plan Green Yellow Green 2017 Solano County Emergency Operations Plan
Climate Action Plan, Vulnerability Ass'mt,
or Adaptation Plan Green Yellow Green 2011 Sustaintability & Climate Change Plan Sustainable Community Plan (SB 375) Yellow Yellow Yellow ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 Local Delta/ Wetlands Program(s) N/A N/A N/A
Downtown Plan with hazard focus Yellow Yellow Green Heart of Fairfield, 2017, discusses flooding Community Health Assessment(s) N/A N/A N/A
National Flood Protection Program (NFIP)
Floodplain Management Regulations Green Yellow Green Flood Damage Prevention, Statutory Authorization and Findings (8A.1.1)
Flood Insurance Education and Technical
Assist. Yellow Yellow Yellow
Flood Hazard Mapping / Re-Mapping Green Yellow Yellow Flood Insurance Rate Maps Community Rating System (CRS) Green Yellow Green
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 539 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 36 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-27
3.5.1.2 Administrative and Technical Capabilities
Table 3-11: Administrative and Technical Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity Notes / Additional Detail
Administrative and Technical
Community Planning and
Development Services
Community Planner
Green Green Yellow
Planning Department with several planners
All staffing is currently adequate, no hazard
mitigation additonal staffing is identified; staff
can continue to integrate hazard mitigation.
Civil Engineer Green Yellow Yellow Petya McInnis, Associate Civil Engineer Building Code Official Green Yellow Yellow Jeff Thomas, Chief Building Official Floodplain Administrator Green Green Yellow Director of Public Works, Paul Kaushal Fire Marshall Green Green Yellow Steven Conti, Fire Marshal Dedicated Public Outreach Personnel Green Green Yellow Bill Way GIS Specialist and Capability Green Green Yellow Jasmin Acuna Emergency Manager Green Green Yellow Fire Chief
Grant Manager, Writer, or Specialist Green Green Yellow Multiple City staff write grants Other 0 0 0
Warning Systems/Services
General Green Green Yellow AlertSolano
Flood
Green Green Yellow
AlertSolano:
Flood Risk: California Department of Water
Resources Flood Risk Notification Program
Flood Control: Solano County Water Agency
Wildfire Green Green Yellow AlertSolano
Geological Hazards Green Green Yellow AlertSolano
ShakeAlert.org (nation-wide)
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 540 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 37 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-28
3.5.1.3 Financial Capabilities
Table 3-12: Financial Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity Notes / Additional Detail
Fiscal Capabilities
Financial Resources for Hazard
Mitigation
Levy for Specific Purposes with Voter
Approval Green Yellow Yellow
Many of these fiscal capabilities are not
expected to be utilized in the future to fund
hazard mitigation; thus the opportunity is
limited.
Utilities Fees Green Green Yellow
Benefit assessments Green Green Yellow Paradise Valley Assessment District System Development Fee Yellow Yellow Yellow
Various Bonds to Incur Debt Yellow Orange Yellow
Withheld Spending in Hazard-Prone
Areas Orange Orange Orange
Stormwater Service Fees Yellow Yellow Yellow
Capital Improvement Project Funding Green Green Green
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 541 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 38 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-29
3.5.1.4 Education and Outreach
Table 3-13: Education and Outreach Capabilities
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT LEGEND
Status Current Mitigation Use Future Opportunity
Currently in use or present. Used widely for mitigation. Opportunity to expand and integrate. (Sort of) Seldomly used or limited
presence. Limited use in mitigation planning. Limited opportunity to expand and integrate. (No) Not present or available. Not used in mitigation planning. No opportunity to expand or integrate.
HMP Integration
Notes / Additional Detail Resource Status
Current
Mitigation
Use
Future
Opportunity
Education / Outreach Capabilities
Education/Outreach Resources
Website Dedicated to Hazard Topics Green Green Green Flood Hazard Information webpage; Disaster Preparedness Links
Dedicated Social Media Green Yellow Yellow Sometimes topical on City website Hazard Info. Avail. at Library/ Planning
Desk Yellow Yellow Green General Plan Hazards Maps are very conceptual in scale and utility.
Annual Public Safety Events Yellow Yellow Yellow None during COVID-19 Ability to Field Public Tech. Assistance
Requests Green Yellow Green
Public Safety Newsletters or Printed
Outreach Orange Orange Green
Fire Safe Councils Orange Orange Green
Resource Conservation Districts Green Yellow Green Solano Resource Conservation District Other 0 0 0
3.5.1.5 Capability and Adaptive Capacity Opportunities
The City of Fairfield identified many opportunities for strengthening community capabilities and adaptive capacity. The City considered this assessment in developing its Mitigation Strategy.
The City is updating its General Plan, which will set the foundation for additional hazard mitigation capacity in the future. The City identified opportunities to revisit code language that could be strengthened for hazard protection and additional outreach and planning opportunities related to wildfire in particular.
Volume 1, Section 5.3.5 includes an extensive list of federal and state funding opportunities to leverage to improve community capabilities.
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 542 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 39 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-30
Mitigation Actions
Mitigation actions were developed based upon the
jurisdiction’s priorities, risk assessment results, and mitigation alternatives. The mitigation action
prioritization method used by all participating
jurisdictions is described in Section 5.5.1 of Volume 1.
Table 3-14 lists each priority mitigation action,
responsible party, time frame, potential funding source, implementation steps, and resources need to
implement based upon the Planning Committee
consensus.
Each participating jurisdiction, including the City of
Fairfield, considered ongoing relevancy of mitigation
actions from the existing MJHMP and retained or
removed such actions while adding new relevant
actions as well. Mitigation actions were examined for
relevancy and the potential for future implementation
and then evaluated for potential follow-up. Some
mitigation actions developed during the previous HMP
effort were not included because they were an inherent
part of the HMP update process or were not detailed
enough for implementation at a local Jurisdiction level. the City of Fairfield has made significant changes to
other mitigation actions because of the updated risk
assessment and implementation strategy, to include more detail, or to update based on current mitigation practices. Volume 1, Section 5.5.2 provides a record of County wide mitigation actions, the status, and additional notes for each action.
Table 3-14 lists each mitigation action for the City of Fairfield. Each participating jurisdiction developed unique mitigation actions, targeted at their own unique priorities and vulnerabilities. Each mitigation action identifies the responsible party, time frame, potential funding source, implementation steps and resources needed to implement these priority mitigation actions. As a living document, hazard problem statements and mitigation activities will be updated through MAST. The detail in Table 3-14 meets the regulatory requirements of FEMA and DMA 2000.
Figure 3-16: Mitigation Action Key
FINAL for adoption Packet Page 543 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 40 of 42
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
3-31
Table 3-14: City of Fairfield Mitigation Actions
Mitigation No. Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type
Status Year Primary
Agency
Title/Description Responsible
Party
Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source
Priority Related
Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-AH-FF-137 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Develop an assessment plan to
determine railway points of
vulnerability to more accurately
predict areas of which would be
impacted most during railway
damage events.
Fire
Department
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years N/A EMPG , Internal
Funding
Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-AH-FF-136
ma-AH-FF-193 All Hazard ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2011 City of
Fairfield
Designate and outfit Back-Up
Emergency Operations Center
Fire
Department
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
EMPG , Internal
Funding
High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-FF-139,
ps-EW-FF-140
ma-EQ-FF-144 Earthquake SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Reinforce local direct fed water
systems, tanks, pumps and
storage tanks through various
protection activities.
City Public
Works
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA , Internal
Funding
High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-FF-145
ma-EQ-FF-145 Earthquake SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Retrofit City-owned critical
facilities and buildings.
City Public
Works
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
Internal
Funding
High Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EQ-FF-146
ma-EQ-FF-183 Earthquake ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Develop a run book for buildings
containing hazardous materials,
including hazardous material
locations and site map.
Fire
Department;
Police
Department
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years N/A EMPG , Internal
Funding
High Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 3:
Environment
ps-EQ-FF-148,
ps-EQ-FF-147
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 544 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 41 of 42
MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
SOLANO COUNTY
SOLANO COUNTY | MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
3-32
Mitigation No. Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type
Status Year Primary
Agency
Title/Description Responsible
Party
Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source
Priority Related
Goal(s)
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-EW-FF-139 Extreme
Weather
PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Implement a tree removal
program for trees that are at a
high risk to snapping in wind
events around City facilities and
infrastructure.
Fire
Department
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years N/A Internal
Funding
Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-EW-FF-139
ma-EW-FF-140 Extreme
Weather
ES -
Emergency
Services
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Install backup power generators
to support operation of critical
facilities, including water and
wastewater systems, emergency
services, and cooling and heating
centers.
Fire
Department;
Police
Department
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
EMPG , Internal
Funding
Medium Goal 1: People ,
Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-EW-FF-140
ma-FL-FF-138 Flood SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Reinforce local ramps, bridges,
and roads from flooding,
including elevating road(s) and
installing culverts beneath roads
or building a higher bridge across
areas that experiences regular
flooding.
City Public
Works
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
FMA , Internal
Funding
Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure
ps-FL-FF-138,
ps-EW-FF-141
ma-FL-FF-181 Flood/
Climate
Change
PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 City of
Fairfield
Develop an annual drainage
maintenance plan including
assessing high water marks to
assess water depth and settling
locations. Including in the plan
the clearing of inlets annually (or
more often as necessary) prior to
monsoon season heavy rain
events which are worsening due
to climate change.
City Public
Works
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years N/A FMA , EMPG ,
Internal
Funding
Medium Goal 2:
Infrastructure ,
Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-FL-FF-137
ma-WF -FF-141 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention
Ongoing 2021 City of
Fairfield
Develop a community wildfire
protection plan (CWPP) that
identifies and prioritizes areas for
hazard fuel reduction treatments
and recommend the types of
methods of treatments.
Fire
Department
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
Medium - Project will have
a long-term impact on the
reduction of risk exposure
for life and property, or
project will not provide an
immediate reduction in the
risk exposure for property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC ,
FP&S , Internal
Funding
High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-WF-FF-142
ma-WF -FF-142 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention
Ongoing 2021 City of
Fairfield
Develop a wildfire education
program in collaboration with
local fire entities to conduct a
public outreach and education
campaign to encourage
homeowners to mitigate their
properties and vegetation
accumulation around their
homes.
Fire
Department
Low - The project could be
funded under the existing
budget. The project is part
of or can be part of an
ongoing existing program.
High - Project will provide
an immediate reduction of
risk exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years 5% FP&S , Internal
Funding
High Goal 4:
Resilience
ps-WF-FF-143,
ps-WF-FF-144
FINAL for adoptionPacket Page 545 of 1095Attachment 3 Page 42 of 42
Agenda Item No: 7.
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:March 1, 2022
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:David Gassaway, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:Resolution 202235 of the City Council of the City of Fairfield Approving a Lease Agreement for Multifunction Copiers with Canon Solutions America, Inc.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt resolution.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The City of Fairfield's lease for multifunction copier machines has expired with Canon Solutions America, Inc. (CSA). The City proposes to enter into a new 60month lease agreement to replace all copy machines citywide and provide maintenance and service to the copiers during the lease.
DISCUSSION
In 2019 the City consolidated individual departmental leases for copier machines into a single 24 month lease with CSA. That lease has expired, and a new lease is required to maintain copier services. The Information Technology (IT) department recently conducted a joint review of the CSA copier fleet with each department in the City and representatives from Canon. Before this joint review, IT staff conducted an internal machine use and history audit. It surveyed each department's power users to evaluate overall performance and satisfaction with the copier fleet. IT staff has determined that the City is pleased with the quality of the machines and the level of service provided by CSA.
Therefore, the City wishes to enter into a new 60month lease agreement that replaces all 41 copiers located throughout the City. The new copiers will have the latest speed, paper options, and configurations available from CSA that suit the needs of each location. Additionally, the new copiers will provide improved security features built into the hardware, including subscriptions to advanced software compliant with cybersecurity standards. The length of the lease term was determined to give the best solutions at the most advantageous pricing for the City. The proposed lease is from the cooperative purchasing agreement between Canon Solutions America, Inc. and the University of California. This national cooperative purchasing contract with Omnia Partners (formerly known as National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance) enables municipalities and other governmental agencies, including the City, to obtain the best pricing and favorably negotiated terms with this vendor.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Packet Page 546 of 1095
Agenda Item No: 7.AGENDA REPORTDATE:March 1, 2022 TO:Mayor and City CouncilFROM:David Gassaway, Interim City ManagerSUBJECT:Resolution 202235 of the City Council of the City of Fairfield Approving a LeaseAgreement for Multifunction Copiers with Canon Solutions America, Inc.RECOMMENDED ACTIONAdopt resolution.STATEMENT OF ISSUEThe City of Fairfield's lease for multifunction copier machines has expired with Canon SolutionsAmerica, Inc. (CSA). The City proposes to enter into a new 60month lease agreement to replace allcopy machines citywide and provide maintenance and service to the copiers during the lease.DISCUSSIONIn 2019 the City consolidated individual departmental leases for copier machines into a single 24month lease with CSA. That lease has expired, and a new lease is required to maintain copierservices. The Information Technology (IT) department recently conducted a joint review of the CSAcopier fleet with each department in the City and representatives from Canon. Before this joint review, ITstaff conducted an internal machine use and history audit. It surveyed each department's power users toevaluate overall performance and satisfaction with the copier fleet. IT staff has determined that the Cityis pleased with the quality of the machines and the level of service provided by CSA.Therefore, the City wishes to enter into a new 60month lease agreement that replaces all 41 copierslocated throughout the City. The new copiers will have the latest speed, paper options, andconfigurations available from CSA that suit the needs of each location. Additionally, the new copiers willprovide improved security features built into the hardware, including subscriptions to advanced softwarecompliant with cybersecurity standards. The length of the lease term was determined to give the bestsolutions at the most advantageous pricing for the City. The proposed lease is from the cooperativepurchasing agreement between Canon Solutions America, Inc. and the University of California. Thisnational cooperative purchasing contract with Omnia Partners (formerly known as NationalIntergovernmental Purchasing Alliance) enables municipalities and other governmental agencies,including the City, to obtain the best pricing and favorably negotiated terms with this vendor.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed equipment lease for the 41 new copiers will be $6,670 a month ($80,040 annually) plus applicable taxes. During the lease, we anticipate that the City may require additional machines due to future changes in the workforce and City needs. Staff requests a $100,000 contingency to include an estimated $40,000 for taxes and $60,000 for additional machines over the lease term. The total amount requested for the 60month lease is $500,200. The Canon fleet maintenance lease will be funded by the Computer Services fund (52299000).
PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
NA
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Council could choose not to approve the proposed lease with CSA. The City would have to purchase, repair and service the existing CSA copiers at nondiscounted pricing. Repair requests would rise as the copiers age out and require more maintenance, and user satisfaction would decline as machines become less functional and require more attention. The Omnia contract provides the City with the best pricing and services for multifunction copier services and locks in this pricing for the agreement term.
STAFF CONTACT
Peter Perez, IT Manager
(707) 4287541
[email protected]
COORDINATED WITH
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Proposed Resolution
Master Services Agreement
Equipment Lease SER700
SLS900 TradeIn Schedule
REVIEWERS:
Reviewer Action Date
Perez, Peter Approved 2/9/2022 7:55 PM
Bertany, Jeffrey Approved 2/9/2022 8:12 PM
Chaudhary, Savita Approved 2/9/2022 8:32 PM
Alexander, Amber Approved 2/15/2022 5:14 PM
Alexander, Amber Approved 2/15/2022 5:26 PM
Packet Page 547 of 1095
CITY OF FAIRFIELD
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-35
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR MULTIFUNCTION COPIERS WITH CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC.
WHEREAS, the multifunction digital equipment leases between the City of Fairfield (City) and Canon Solutions America, Inc. (CSA) have expired; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Information Technology Department recommends renewing the lease with CSA for a 60-month period; and
WHEREAS, CSA has entered into a competitively bid pricing contract with the University of California, which, through Omnia Partners, is made available to participating government entities to obtain the most beneficial pricing for multifunction digital copiers; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 28.43 of the city code, the city manager may utilize cooperative purchasing agreements to purchase supplies through legal contracts of other governmental jurisdictions or public agencies without separate competitive bidding by the City; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a new lease agreement with CSA for multifaction digital copiers.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the expenditure of funds not to exceed $500,000 over 60 months (plus tax) from the Computer Services Fund (522-99-000-9004) for the lease, upgrade, and maintenance of the City’s CSA copier fleet.
Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the city manager to execute a lease agreement, substantially the forms attached hereto as CSA Lease Schedule (SER-700 and SLS-915) and Trade in, Upgrade, Return Schedule (SLS-900) and a maintenance agreement, substantially the forms attached hereto as CSA Master Sales & Services Agreement (MA23041) with Canon Solutions America, Inc., with such non-substantive changes as may be approved by the city attorney.
Section 3. The City Council further authorizes the city manager to do all things necessary to implement this resolution.
Packet Page 548 of 1095Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2
RES. NO. 2022-35