Agenda — Fairfield City Council, June 6, 2023 (part 2 of 5)

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

_________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK

Packet Page 304 of 839Attachment 2 Page 2 of 2

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-138

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FAIRFIELD DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH CITY OF FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-2 (TRAIN STATION SPECIFIC PLAN II)

TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN, AND TO SET A DATE FOR THE PUBLIC

HEARING

WHEREAS, the city council has determined that it is necessary and desirable to create a community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982”, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (Act), as amended, for the purpose of financing open space, police services, paramedic services, fire protection and suppression services, and park maintenance services; and

WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the council to establish a community facilities district and to levy special taxes within the CFD; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2. Initiation of Proceedings. The council hereby declares its intention to conduct proceedings for the formation of a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

Section 3. Name of CFD. The proposed community facilities district shall be known and designated as “City of Fairfield Community Facilities District No. 2023-2 (Train Station Specific Plan II) (CFD).

Section 4. Boundaries of CFD. A description of the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in the CFD, including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a special tax by the CFD, is as shown on the boundary map designated as “MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-2 (TRAIN STATION SPECIFIC PLAN II),” which is on file in the office of the city clerk and is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated by reference.

Section 5. Description of Services. It is the intention of this council to finance certain services described below (Services). The council hereby finds that the Services are in addition to those provided in the territory within the CFD prior to the establishment of the CFD, and that such Services will not supplant services already available within that territory. A general description of the services to be provided is as follows:

Packet Page 305 of 839Attachment 3 Page 1 of 6

RES. NO. 2023-138

Page 2 ends

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SERVICE COMPONENTS

A. Public Safety Services, police protection services, fire and suppression services, and paramedic services
B. Public Open Space Operation and Maintenance
C. Public Parks Operation and Maintenance
D. Public Cemeteries Operation and Maintenance

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE

Operation and Maintenance of public landscaping, linear parks, storm drainage basins, streetlights, pump stations, and the public lake.

CFD ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

All services and administration shall be provided by the City of Fairfield with its own forces or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof, to be determined entirely by the City. The cost of the services shall include the estimated and reasonable costs of providing services, including but not limited to: (i) the costs of contracting for services, (ii) the salaries and benefits of City staff, if the City directly provides services, (iii) the expense related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to the services and authorized by the Act and (iv) a proportionate share of City overhead costs associated with providing the services.

The cost of the services shall also include incidental expenses, including the costs associated with forming the CFD, determination of the amount of the Special Taxes, collection of the Special Taxes, payment of the Special Taxes, and costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the district.

Section 6. Special Tax. It is hereby further proposed that, except where funds are otherwise available to pay for the Services, a special tax sufficient to pay for such Services and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act (Special Tax or Special Taxes), secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the CFD, will be levied annually within the boundaries of the CFD. Under no circumstances will the Special Tax authorized to be levied within the CFD be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels used for private residential purposes and located within the CFD by more than 10 percent. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax proposed to be levied within the CFD, reference is made to the att ached and incorporated Exhibit B, which sets forth in sufficient detail the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax among parcels of real property in the CFD (Rate and Method) to allow each Packet Page 306 of 839Attachment 3 Page 2 of 6

RES. NO. 2023-138

Page 3 ends

landowner or resident within the CFD to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay for such Services. The council hereby determines the Rate and Method set forth in Exhibit B to be reasonable.

The Special Taxes herein authorized, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes, or shall be collected in such other manner as may be provided by the council. Any Special Taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the city treasurer or duly appointed officer or agent of the City, as appointed by the council.

Section 7. Public Hearing. Notice is given that on the July 18, 2023, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as practical), in the regular meeting place of the council being the City Council Chambers, located at 1000 Webster Street, Fairfield, California 94533, a public hearing will be held where this council will consider the establishment of the proposed CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of the Services within the CFD, and the proposed Rate and Method, and all other matters as set forth in this resolution of intention. At the above -mentioned time and place for public hearing, any persons interested, including taxpayers, persons registered to vote within the CFD, and property owners, may appear and be heard. The testimony of all interested persons for or against the establishment of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, or the furnishing of the Services will be heard and considered. Any protests may be made orally or in writing. However, any protests pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings shall be in writing and clearly set forth the irregularities and defects to which the objection is made.

All written protests shall be filed with the city clerk of the council on or before the time fixed for the public hearing. Written protests may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing.

If a written majority protest against the establishment of the CFD is filed (as determined in accordance with Section 53324 of the Act), the proceedings shall be abandoned. If such majority protest is limited to certain services or portions of the Special Tax, those services or that tax shall be eliminated by the council.

Section 8. Election. If, following the public hearing described in Section 7 above, the council determines to establish the CFD and proposes to levy the Special Tax within the CFD, the council shall then submit the levy of the Special Taxes to the qualified electors of the CFD. The vote shall be by the landowners of the CFD with each landowner or the authorized representative thereof, having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land owned within the CFD.

Packet Page 307 of 839Attachment 3 Page 3 of 6

RES. NO. 2023-138

Page 4 ends

The election shall be conducted by the city clerk and shall be held on a date selected by the council in conformance with the provisions of Section 53326 of the California Government Code and pursuant to the provisions of the California Elections Code, insofar as they may be applicable.

Pursuant to said Section 53326, the ballots for the election shall be distributed to the qualified electors of the CFD by mail with return postage prepaid or by personal service, and the special election shall be conducted as a mail ballot election.

A successful election relating to the Special Tax authorization shall, as applicable, establish the appropriations limit as authorized by Article XIIIB of the California Constitu tion as it is applicable to the CFD.

Section 9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the city clerk by causing a Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the legally designated newspaper of general circulation, such publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with such publication to be completed at least seven days prior to the date set for the public hearing. In addition, notice of the time and place of said hearing shall also be given by first- class mail to each registered voter and to each landowner within the proposed CFD as prescribed by Section 53322.4 of said Act. Said notice shall be published at least seven days and mailed at least 15 days before the date of the hearing, and shall contain the information required by said Section 53322 of the Act.

Section 10. Exempt Properties. Except as provided in Section 53340.1 of the Act and except for properties that a local agency is a landowner of within the meaning of subdivision (f) of Section 53317 of the Act, pursuant to Section 53340 of the California Government Code, properties of entities of the state, federal, and local governments shall be exempt from the levy of Special Taxes for the financing of the Services of the proposed CFD. Reference is hereby made to the Rate and Method for a description of other properties or entities that are expressly exempted from the levy of the Special Taxes.

Section 11. City-Owned Property. The council hereby finds that land presently owned by the City is intended to be transferred to private ownership and will be subject to the Special Tax on the same basis as private property within the proposed CFD. The council hereby affirmatively waives any defense based on the fact of public ownership, to any action to foreclose on th e property in the event of nonpayment of the Special Tax. Pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 53317 of the Act and based on the preceding finding and waiver in this section, the City is a landowner for the purposes of the Act.

Packet Page 308 of 839Attachment 3 Page 4 of 6

RES. NO. 2023-138

Page 5 ends

Section 12. Necessity. The council finds that the proposed Services described in Section 5 hereof are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of new development occurring within the boundaries of the proposed CFD.

Section 13. Annexation of Territory. Other property may be annexed into the CFD pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

Section 14. Public Interest. Pursuant to Section 53329.5(c) of the Act, the council finds, in its opinion, the public interest will not be served by allowing property owners in the CFD to enter into a contract pursuant to Section 53329.5(a) of the Act.

Section 15. Advances. The City or CFD may accept advances of funds or work-in-kind from any source, including but not limited to, private persons or private entities, and is authorized and directed to use such funds or that work-in-kind for any authorized purpose, including but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the City in creating the CFD. The City or CFD may enter into an agreement with the person or entity advancing the funds or work-in-kind, to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced, or to reimburse the person or entity for the value, or cost, whichever is less, of the work-in-kind, as determined by the council, with or without interest.

Section 16. Reports. Each City officer who is or will be responsible for providing one or more of the proposed types of services to be financed by the CFD, if it is established, is hereby directed to study the proposed CFD and, at or before the time of th e public hearing, file a report with the City Council, which is to be part of the record of the public hearing, containing the following: (i) a brief description of the services by type that will in the City officer’s opinion be required to adequately meet the needs of the CFD and (ii) an estimate of the cost of providing those services.

Packet Page 309 of 839Attachment 3 Page 5 of 6

RES. NO. 2023-138

Page 6 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 310 of 839Attachment 3 Page 6 of 6

T4T1T8T7T5T3PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-2(TRAIN STATION SPECIFIC PLAN II)CITY OF FAIRFIELDCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIA.SiteVicinity MapTravis AvWalters RdAir Base PkwyA StDavis StDover AvAlamo DrMcCrory RdPeabody RdRivera RdFry RdNorth Gate Rd W80E80SiteFILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THIS ___________ DAYOF__________, 20____.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING PROPOSEDBOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-2(TRAIN STATION SPECIFIC PLAN II), CITY OF FAIRFIELD, COUNTY OFSOLANO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD AT A REGULAR MEETING,THEREOF, HELD ON THE ____________ DAY OF ____________, 20___,BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. ___________________._______________________________________CITY CLERKCITY OF FAIRFIELDFILED THIS _________________ DAY OF _________________, 20___,AT THE HOUR OF ____________ 0’CLOCK _________,M. IN BOOK__________ PAGE(S) ___________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT ANDCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND INSTRUMENT NO._________________ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER INTHE COUNTY OF SOLANO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.GLENN ZOOK, ASSESSOR/RECORDER_______________________________________BY DEPUTYCOUNTY RECORDERCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIATHE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ONTHIS DIAGRAM SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS ASSHOWN ON THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS FOR THOSEPARCELS LISTED.THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAP SHALL GOVERN FOR ALLDETAIL CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH LOTSOR PARCELS.SHEET 1 OF 1LegendProposed BoundariesMap Reference Number1VANDEN ROADONE LAKE DRIVELAKE TRAIL21069MAP REFERENCE NUMBERASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S)1 0166-020-2802 0166-020-2903 0166-420-0104 0166-420-0205 0166-420-0306 0166-420-1807 0166-420-3608 0166-420-3909 0166-480-010 to 0166-480-47010 0166-490-010 to 0166-490-230EXHIBIT APacket Page 311 of 839Attachment 4 Page 1 of 1

CITY OF FAIRFIELD
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 2023-2
(TRAIN STATION SPECIFIC PLAN II)

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED RATE AND METHOD

OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
A Special Tax applicable to each Assessor's Parcel in the City of Fairfield Community Facilities District No. 2023-2 (Train Station Specific Plan II) shall be levied and collected according to the tax liability determined by the Administrator through the application of the appropriate amount or rate for Taxable Property, as described below. All of the property in the CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided, including property subsequently annexed to the CFD, unless a separate Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax is adopted for the annexation area.

A.DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Accessory Unit" means a second residential unit of limited size (e.g., granny cottage, second unit) that shares a Parcel with a single-family detached unit. "Acre" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map or other recorded County parcel map. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 53311), Part 1, Division 2, of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California.
"Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to administration of the CFD: the costs of computing the Special Tax and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City, a designee thereof, or both); the costs of collecting Special Taxes; the costs to the City, CFD, or any designee thereof of complying with City, CFD, or obligated persons disclosure requirements associated with the Act; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries, protests, or appeals regarding the Special Tax; the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses; and any other incidental costs authorized by the Act. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD for any other administrative purposes of the CFD, including attorney's fees and costs associated with annexations to the CFD. In addition, all services and administration shall be provided by the City of Fairfield (the "City"), with its own forces or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof, to be determined entirely by the City. The cost of the Services shall include the estimated and reasonable costs of providing services, including but not limited to: (i) the costs of contracting for services, (ii) the salaries and benefits of City staff, if the City directly provides services, (iii) the expense related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to the services and

EXHIBIT B
Packet Page 312 of 839Attachment 5 Page 1 of 9

authorized by the Act, and (iv) a proportionate share of City overhead costs associated with providing the services.
“Administrator" means an official of the City, or any designee thereof, responsible for providing for the levy and collection of the Special Tax.
“Affordable Housing” means for each Fiscal Year, any Residential Unit(s) located on an Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property that is available at an affordable housing cost due to a regulatory agreement of no less than 15 years, restricting 100% of the Residential Unit(s) on the Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property to be affordable to households that are extremely low to low income, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5. The City will have the authority to approve and establish policies regarding Affordable Housing and their status. "Assessor's Parcel" or "Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel Number.
"Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the County Assessor designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number.
"Assessor's Parcel Number" means a unique number assigned to an Assessor's Parcel by the County Assessor for purposes of identifying a property. "Building Permit" means a single permit or set of permits required to construct a residential or non-residential structure. If a permit is issued for a foundation, parking, landscaping or other related facility or amenity, but a building permit has not yet been issued for the structure served by these facilities or amenities, such permit shall not be considered a "Building Permit" for purposes of application of the Special Tax herein.
"CFD" means the City of Fairfield Community Facilities District No. 2023-2 (Train Station Specific Plan II).
"CFD Administration Component" means the component of the Maximum Special Tax that is designated to pay for Administrative Expenses.
"CFD Formation" means the date on which the Resolution of Formation to form the CFD was adopted by the City Council.
"City" means the City of Fairfield.
"City Council" means the City Council of the City of Fairfield, acting as the legislative body of the CFD.
"Commercial Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for a commercial establishment which includes, but is not limited to, retail stores, clothing stores, book stores, drug stores, professional services (i.e., barber shops, dry cleaners), restaurants, supermarkets, hospitals, movie theaters, appliance and electronic stores, home supply stores, auto parts stores, and other businesses providing such products Packet Page 313 of 839Attachment 5 Page 2 of 9

and services. The City shall make the determination as to whether a Parcel is Commercial Property.
"County" means the County of Solano.
"Developed Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Taxable Property for which a Building Permit was issued prior to June 30 of the preceding Fiscal Year. "DA" means the Amended and Restated Development Agreement including all exhibits and attachments, executed by the City and Canon Station LLC, dated May 8, 2015, and as amended from time to time.

"DA Services Budget" means, in any Fiscal Year, the City's estimate of DA Services Costs and any amounts for a reserve fund for DA Services Costs that will be funded by the DA Services Component.
"DA Services Component" means the component of the Maximum Special Tax that is designated to pay for DA Services Costs.
"DA Services Costs" means the following public services as determined by the City: (i) public safety services; (ii) maintenance and operation of public open space land; (iii), maintenance and operation of public parks and public open space, and (iv) operation and maintenance of public cemeteries.
"Escalation Factor" means, in any Fiscal Year, the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area, for the prior 12-month period (April to April) as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"Final Map" means a final map approved by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) that creates individual lots on which a Building Permit can be issued for construction of Residential Units without further subdivision of the lots.
"Fiscal Year" means the period starting on July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "High Density Residential Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for construction of a residential structure with five or more Residential Units that share a single Assessor's Parcel number, all of which are offered for rent to the general public and cannot be purchased by individual homebuyers. "Industrial Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for construction of an industrial, manufacturing, or warehousing structure.

The City shall make the determination as to whether a Parcel is Industrial Property. "Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget" means, in any Fiscal Year, the City's estimate of Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Costs and any amounts for a reserve fund for Packet Page 314 of 839Attachment 5 Page 3 of 9

Lighting and Landscape Maintenance costs that will be funded by the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component.
"Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component" means the component of the Maximum Special Tax that is designated to pay for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Costs. "Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Costs" means the costs of maintenance and operation of landscaping, linear parks, storm drainage basins, street lights, pump stations, and/or the public lake.
"Maximum CFD Administration Component" means the greatest amount that can be levied on a Parcel in any Fiscal Year to pay for Administrative Expenses, as set forth in Section C below.
“Maximum DA Services Component" means the greatest amount that can be levied on a Parcel in any Fiscal Year to pay for DA Services Costs, as set forth in Section C below. "Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component" means the greatest amount that can be levied on a Parcel in any Fiscal Year to pay for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Costs, as set forth in Section C below.
"Maximum Special Tax" means, collectively for a Parcel, the Maximum CFD Administration Component, Maximum DA Services Component, and Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component for such Parcel.
"Maximum Tax Component" means, for a Parcel, any one of the following components of the Maximum Special Tax for such Parcel: CFD Administration Component, DA Services Component, or Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component. "Mixed-Use Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for construction of a structure that includes a combination of residential and non-residential land uses.
"Multi-Family Residential Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property, which are not Affordable Housing, for which a Building Permit was issued for construction of a residential structure consisting of two or more Residential Units that share common walls, have separate Assessor's Parcel numbers assigned to them (except for a duplex unit, which may share an Assessor's Parcel with another duplex unit), and are offered as for- sale Residential Units (which shall still be the case even if the Residential Units are purchased and subsequently offered for rent by the owner of such Residential Unit(s)), including residential structures that meet the statutory definition of a condominium contained in Civil Code Section 1351.
"Office Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for a building in which professional, banking, insurance, real estate, administrative or in-office medical or dental activities are conducted. The City shall make the determination as to whether a Parcel is Office Property.

Packet Page 315 of 839Attachment 5 Page 4 of 9

"Open Space Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels within the CFD that: (i) are designated as permanent open space, (ii) are not Public Property, and (iii) have been assigned Assessor's Parcel Numbers.
"Proportionately" means, for Developed Property and Open Space Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax Component levied in any Fiscal Year to the Maximum Tax Component authorized to be levied in that Fiscal Year is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and Open Space Property. For Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax Component levied in any Fiscal Year to the Maximum Tax Component authorized to be levied in that Fiscal Year is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property. "Public Property" means, in any Fiscal Year: (i) all Parcels within the boundaries of the CFD that are owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State of California, the City or any other public agency; provided, however, that Taxable City Property shall not be categorized as Public Property, and any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act (as such section may be amended or replaced) shall be taxed and classified in accordance with its use; and (ii) all Parcels within the boundaries of the CFD that are encumbered by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement. "Residential Unit" means: (i), for Single Family Detached Property an individual single-family detached unit, (ii) for Multi-Family Residential Property, an individual dwelling unit within a duplex, halfplex, triplex, fourplex, townhome, live/work or condominium structure, and (iii) for High Density Residential Property, an individual apartment unit. An Accessory Unit that shares a Parcel with a single-family detached unit shall not be considered a separate Residential Unit for purposes of this RMA.
"RMA" means this Second Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.
"Single Family Detached Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property, which is not Affordable Housing, for which a Building Permit was issued for construction of a Residential Unit that does not share a common wall with another Residential Unit.
"Special Tax" means any tax levied within the CFD to pay one or more of the following:

Administrative Expenses, DA Services Costs, and/or Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Costs.
"Special Tax Component" means, separately, the CFD Administration Component, the DA Services Component, or the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component. "Square Foot" means, for Commercial Property, Office Property, Industrial Property, and non- residential uses on Mixed-Use Property, each individual square foot within the net leasable square footage shown on the condominium plan, construction drawings, architectural designs, or other such plan for the building.

Packet Page 316 of 839Attachment 5 Page 5 of 9

"Taxable City Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, any Parcel within the boundaries of the CFD that is (i) owned by the City at CFD Formation, (ii) expected to be transferred to a developer for private development, and (iii) based on this expectation, has been included in the CFD boundary and is subject to the levy of Special Taxes. Each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall coordinate with the City to determine which City-owned Parcels are Taxable City Property. "Taxable Property" means all Parcels within the boundaries of the CFD that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Tax Zone" means a mutually exclusive geographic area within which the Special Tax may be levied pursuant to this RMA. All of the property within the CFD at the time of CFD Formation is within Tax Zone 1. Additional Tax Zones may be created when property is annexed to the CFD, and different amounts for one or more Maximum Tax Components may be identified for property within the new Tax Zone at the time of such annexation. "Tax Zone 1" means the property included in the CFD at CFD Formation and any property that is subsequently annexed into Tax Zone 1.
"Undeveloped Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Taxable Property in the CFD that are not Developed Property, Open Space Property, or Taxable City Property. “Welfare Exemption Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, any Parcels that have received a welfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and for which such welfare exemption is still in place.

B. DATA FOR ANNUAL TAX LEVY
Each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall identify the current Assessor's Parcel Numbers for all Parcels of Taxable Property within the CFD. The Administrator shall also determine: (i) within which Tax Zone each Parcel is located; (ii) whether each Parcel of Taxable Property is Developed Property, Open Space Property, Taxable City Property, or Undeveloped Property; (iii) whether each Parcel of Developed Property is Single Family Detached Property, Multi-Family Residential Property, High Density Residential Property, Commercial Property, Industrial Property, Office Property, or Mixed-Use Property; and (iv) the Administrative Expenses, DA Services Budget, and Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget for the then-current Fiscal Year. For Multi-Family Residential Property and High-Density Residential Property, the number of Residential Units shall be determined by referencing the condominium plan, site plan or other such development plan.

In any Fiscal Year, if it is determined that: (i) a Final Map or parcel map for a portion of property in the CFD was recorded after the last date upon which the Assessor will incorporate the newly- created Parcels into the then current tax roll; (ii) because of the date the Final Map or parcel map was recorded, the Assessor does not yet recognize the new Parcels created by the Final Map or parcel map; and (iii) one or more of the newly-created Parcels meets the definition of Developed Property, the Administrator shall calculate the Special Tax for the property affected by recordation of the Final Map or parcel map by determining the Special Tax that applies separately to each newly-created Parcel, then applying the sum of the individual Special Taxes to the Parcel that was subdivided by recordation of the Final Map or parcel map.

Packet Page 317 of 839Attachment 5 Page 6 of 9

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

1. Developed Property
In any Fiscal Year, the Maximum Special Tax for a Parcel of Developed Property shall be the sum of the Maximum CFD Administration Component, Maximum DA Services Component, and Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component. For Tax Zone 1, such amounts shall be determined by reference to Table 1 below. For property that annexes into the CFD, amounts may be determined for one or more Special Tax Components by creating a separate Tax Zone for such annexed property. Alternatively, property may be annexed into Tax Zone 1 or another Tax Zone that was established prior to the annexation, and such property shall be subject to the Maximum Tax Components applicable to that Tax Zone.

Table 1
Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property in Tax Zone 1

Special Tax
Category
Maximum CFD
Administration
Component
(in Fiscal Year 2022-23 $)*
Maximum DA Services Component
(In Fiscal Year 2022-23 $)*
Maximum Lighting and
Landscape
Maintenance
Component
(in Fiscal Year 2022-23 $)*
Single Family
Detached Property
$129.77 per
Residential Unit
$1,051.41 per
Residential Unit
$850.05 per
Residential Unit
Multi-Family Residential
Property
$88.92 per
Residential Unit
$720.48 per
Residential Unit
$582.49 per
Residential Unit
High Density Residential
Property
$86.65 per
Residential Unit
$702.06 per
Residential Unit
$567.61 per
Residential Unit
Commercial Property $0.034 per
Square Foot
$0.289 per
Square Foot
$0.231 per
Square Foot
Industrial Property $0.005 per
Square Foot
$0.023 per
Square Foot
$0.023 per
Square Foot
Office Property $0.011 per
Square Foot
$0.092 per
Square Foot
$0.081 per
Square Foot
Mixed-Use Property
For a Parcel of Mixed-Use Property, the Maximum Special Tax shall be the sum of the amounts calculated for each Maximum Tax Component by applying that Maximum Tax Component to the individual land uses on the Parcel.
* On July 1, 2023 and each July thereafter, all dollar amounts shown in Table 1 above shall be increased by the Escalation Factor.

2. Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property
In any Fiscal Year, the Maximum Special Tax for a Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be the sum of the Maximum CFD Administration Component, Maximum DA Services Component, and Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component. For Tax Zone 1, such amounts shall be determined by reference to Table 2 below. For property that annexes into the CFD, different amounts may be determined for one or more Special Tax Component by creating a separate Tax Zone for such annexed property. Alternatively, property may be annexed into Tax Packet Page 318 of 839Attachment 5 Page 7 of 9

Zone 1 or another Tax Zone that was established prior to the annexation, and such property shall be subject to the Maximum Tax Components applicable to that Tax Zone.

Table 2
Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property in Tax Zone 1

Special Tax
Category
Maximum CFD
Administration
Component
(in Fiscal Year 2022-23 $)*
Maximum DA Services Component
(in Fiscal Year 2022-22 $)*
Maximum Lighting and
Landscape Maintenance
Component
(in Fiscal Year 2022-23 $)*
Undeveloped Property $747.03 per Acre $57.90 per Acre $4,891.02 per Acre Taxable City Property $747.03 per Acre $57.90 per Acre $4,891.02 per Acre * On July 1, 2023 and each July thereafter, all dollar amounts shown in Table 2 above shall be increased by the Escalation Factor.

3. Open Space Property
The Maximum Special Tax for Open Space Property for Fiscal Year 2022-23 shall be made up solely of a Maximum DA Services Component of $10 per Acre, which amount shall be adjusted on July 1, 2023 and each July 1 thereafter by the Escalation Factor.

D. METHOD OF LEVY AND COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAXES
Each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall coordinate with the City to determine the Administrative Expenses, DA Services Budget, and Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget for that Fiscal Year. The Administrator shall then apply the steps below to determine the Special Tax levy for each Parcel of Taxable Property:

Step 1: The CFD Administration Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Maximum CFD Administration Component until the amount levied is equal to the Administrative Expenses for the Fiscal Year. The DA Services Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property and Open Space Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Maximum DA Services Component until the amount levied is equal to the DA Services Budget for the Fiscal Year. In addition, the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component until the amount levied is equal to the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget for the Fiscal Year.

Step 2: If additional revenue is needed after Step 1 to pay Administrative Expenses, the CFD Administration Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Packet Page 319 of 839Attachment 5 Page 8 of 9

Maximum CFD Administration Component for each Parcel for such Fiscal Year until the amount levied, when combined with the amount levied pursuant to Step 1, is equal to the Administrative Expenses. If additional revenue is needed after Step 1 to pay the DA Services Budget, the DA Services Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Maximum DA Services Component until the amount levied, when combined with the amount levied pursuant to Step 1, is equal to the DA Services Budget for the Fiscal Year. If additional revenue is needed after Step 1 to pay the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget, the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property and Taxable City Property in all Tax Zones up to 100% of the Maximum Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Component until the amount levied, when combined with the amount levied pursuant to Step I, is equal to the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget for the Fiscal Year.

The Special Tax for the CFD shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes provided, however, that the City may (under the authority of Government Code Section 53340) collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CFD, and the Special Tax shall be equally subject to foreclosure if delinquent. For Taxable City Property, the Administrator shall determine the aggregate amount to be levied in any Fiscal Year against all Parcels of Taxable City Property, and a tax bill for such amount shall be sent to the City's Finance Director. The Special Tax shall be levied in perpetuity as necessary to pay the DA Services Budget, Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Budget, and/or Administrative Expenses.

E. EXEMPTIONS
No Special Tax shall be levied on Parcels of Public Property or Affordable Housing.

F. INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL TAX FORMULA
The City may interpret, clarify, and revise this RMA to correct any inconsistency, vagueness, or ambiguity, by resolution and/or ordinance that does not materially affect the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. Interpretations may be made by the City by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this RMA.

Packet Page 320 of 839Attachment 5 Page 9 of 9

Agenda Item No: 16.

AGENDA REPORT
DATE:June 6, 2023
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT:Minute Action Approving Mayor’s Appointments to the Youth Commission and the Solano Commission for Women and Girls
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve appointments. Perform oath of office.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The City Council is being asked to approve the appointments as follows:

Youth Commission
Term 1/1/2023 – 1231/2024

1. Jaivir Chaudhry

2. Madison McCrea

3. Alexa Sevilla
Solano Commission for Women and Girls
Term 1/1/2023 – 12/31/2025

1. Edwina PerezSantiago

DISCUSSION
Five seats are available for the Youth Commission for a twoyear term of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2024.

One seat is available for the Solano Commission for Women and Girls position for a twoyear term of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025.

Councilmembers Doriss Panduro and Scott Tonnesen interviewed 7 applicants on May 18, 2023. All the interviewed applicants listed above were recommended for appointment, and the recommendations were submitted to Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy for consideration.

Mayor Moy agreed with the recommendations provided.

Packet Page 321 of 839

Agenda Item No: 16.AGENDA REPORTDATE:June 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and City CouncilFROM:David Gassaway, City ManagerSUBJECT:Minute Action Approving Mayor’s Appointments to the Youth Commission and theSolano Commission for Women and GirlsRECOMMENDED ACTIONApprove appointments. Perform oath of office.STATEMENT OF ISSUEThe City Council is being asked to approve the appointments as follows:Youth CommissionTerm 1/1/2023 – 1231/20241. Jaivir Chaudhry2. Madison McCrea3. Alexa SevillaSolano Commission for Women and GirlsTerm 1/1/2023 – 12/31/20251. Edwina PerezSantiagoDISCUSSIONFive seats are available for the Youth Commission for a twoyear term of January 1, 2023, throughDecember 31, 2024.One seat is available for the Solano Commission for Women and Girls position for a twoyear term ofJanuary 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025.Councilmembers Doriss Panduro and Scott Tonnesen interviewed 7 applicants on May 18, 2023. Allthe interviewed applicants listed above were recommended for appointment, and the recommendationswere submitted to Mayor Catherine "Cat" Moy for consideration.

Mayor Moy agreed with the recommendations provided.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
N/A
PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose not to approve the mayor’s appointments, thereby leaving vacancies.

STAFF CONTACT
Karen Rees, City Clerk
(707) 4287767
[email protected]
COORDINATED WITH
N/A
REVIEWERS:

Reviewer Action Date
Beavers, Esther Approved 5/22/2023 11:28 AM
Packet Page 322 of 839

Agenda Item No: 17.

AGENDA REPORT
DATE:June 6, 2023
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider Resolutions 2023139 Through 2023147 of the City Council of the City of Fairfield Declaring the Results of the Assessment Ballot Proceedings, Approving the Fiscal Year 20232024 Engineer’s Reports, Ordering the Formation of the Districts, Confirming the Assessments For Fiscal Year 20232024, and Taking Related Actions in Connection with Proposed City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 20231 (Gateway), 20233 (Waterman Highlands), 20235 (Rancho Solano), 20236 (Peppertree), 20237 (Rolling Hills), 20238 (Kolob Estates), 202311 (Paradise Valley), 202312 (Downtown Business District), and 202313 (North Cordelia)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Hold public hearing.

STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Existing Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No. 5 – Rancho Solano, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates, No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia do not generate enough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance services currently being provided. The council has initiated proceedings for the formation of new maintenance districts with higher assessment rates that will support the current level of services. In the absence of majority protests, approval of these resolutions will, for each respective district, declare the results of the assessment balloting proceeding, approve the engineer’s report, as filed or as modified, order the formation of the district, confirm the assessments against the parcels within the district for fiscal year (FY) 20232024, and authorize staff to take the necessary related actions.

DISCUSSION
The City formed 16 existing LLMDs under the State of California Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. (Act), to provide a funding source for the maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements within the various development areas.

Packet Page 323 of 839

During FY 20212022, staff identified that LLMDs, No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No. 5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob, No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia were projected to have a fund balance and budget deficit in the next onetothree fiscal years if services were provided at the same levels as previous fiscal years. Due to the existing maximum assessment rates in each district, the total assessments generated in each district were insufficient to support services at the existing levels.

Staff informed council that a community engagement and assessment balloting process would be conducted, in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known as Proposition 218, during FY 20222023 to propose to property owners the formation of new maintenance districts (Proposed Districts) with higher assessments that would adequately fund services. Each Proposed District is proposed with assessments rates that are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the consumer price index (CPI), not to exceed 3%, as described below. The engineer’s report for each Proposed District includes a base budget that includes funding for regular landscape maintenance services, irrigation services and system repair, regular tree pruning, streetlight service and maintenance in applicable districts, administrative services, contingency spending, and annual reserves. If the Proposed Districts are formed and the assessments confirmed, the council is authorized to levy assessments in FY 20232024 and subsequent fiscal years in amounts which are less than or the same as the assessments set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as increased each year by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San FranciscoOaklandHayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually, beginning July 1, 2024 (Maximum Assessments), without undertaking another balloting proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218.

To minimize the disruption of services while the community engagement and Proposition 218 balloting process was carried out, council issued General Fund loans of $410,000 to LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills, $175,000 to LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, and $151,000 to LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia on May 3, 2022, and loans of $165,000 to LLMD No. 1 – Gateway, $28,000 to LLMD No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, $28,000 to LLMD No. 6 – Peppertree, and $40,000 to LLMD No. 12 – Downtown Business District on August 16, 2022. LLMDs No. 5 – Smith Ranch and No. 8 – Kolob Estates had sufficient fund balance and incoming assessment revenues to maintain services during FY 20222023 and did not require a loan.

The City hired NBS Government Finance Group (NBS or Assessment Engineer) to conduct an engineering and financial analysis of the Proposed Districts and to develop nine engineer’s reports (Engineer’s Reports), as required by the Act and Article XIII D. The city also hired CivicMic, a subsidiary of NBS, to assist with community outreach efforts.

Since early 2022, staff have engaged with property owners in each district to inform them of the funding shortfall and the Proposed Districts. The robust outreach and communication framework included the gathering of data and dissemination of critical information through postcards and flyers, fact sheets, surveys, emails, social media postings, notifications and articles on the City website, inperson and virtual community meetings, and popup question and answer sessions at various locations throughout the city.

CivicMic created a website where residents could find general information about LLMDs and the overall Proposition 218 balloting process, historical facts about their current district and the proposed funding solution, geographic information system (GIS) boundary maps, recordings of past staff presentations, updates on the Proposed District formation progress, the latest news and meeting announcements, and parcelspecific proposed assessment rates. The CivicMic website served as the primary mode of communication during the engagement process and property owners were encouraged to sign up for email notifications to ensure they received timely updates.

Packet Page 324 of 839

Property owners also had the opportunity to join working groups, which were an assembly of individuals from each Proposed District tasked with providing input on the project process, assisting with the gathering of data and delivery of information to community members, and encouraging other property owners in their district to participate in the balloting process.

Since mid2022, Public Works staff worked with NBS to develop the Engineer’s Reports to support the formation of the Proposed Districts. Staff and NBS researched county records, building permit and development records, existing traffic data, and historical operational and administrative matters, such as budgets and previous council actions related to each district. Staff and NBS also identified district boundary lines and maintenance areas, developed critical metrics to inform the proposed assessment rates and district budgets, and prepared the required legal documents to initiate the formation process.

Preliminary draft Engineer’s Reports were provided to property owners in each Proposed District for review in February 2023, except for the report for the Downtown Business District which was released in March 2023 due to the additional research required for that district. The council preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Reports in April 2023, and will consider final approval of the Engineer’s Reports following the public hearing. The Engineer’s Reports are attached to the resolutions as Exhibit B.

If the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are approved, all landscaping and lighting maintenance services in each respective community would be funded by assessments levied against the parcels within the Proposed District, commencing July 1, 2023, and the council would undertake proceedings to dissolve the existing maintenance districts. However, proceedings for the dissolution of the existing LLMDs that received a General Fund loan could be deferred until FY 20282029 to allow the council to continue levying assessments against the parcels within the existing LLMD only in the amount needed to pay the annual loan installment. Each loan was issued at 0% interest with a fiveyear repayment term, commencing in FY 20232024 and concluding at the end of FY 20272028.

In accordance with Article XIII D, approval of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates will obligate the City to pay assessments for all Cityowned property within a Proposed District that receives a special benefit from the district improvements. In addition, the City will provide a contribution for general benefits conferred on real property located in each Proposed District or to the public at large. The assessments and contributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI, not to exceed 3%. The total General Fund impact for FY 20232024 is as follows:

District No.Assessment Contribution Total
20231 (Gateway)0 83,280 83,280
20233 (Waterman Highlands)1,937 32,127 34,064
20235 (Rancho Solano)152,115 61,878 213,993
20236 (Peppertree)100 16,480 16,580
20237 (Rolling Hills)7,136 129,274 136,410
20238 (Kolob Estates)0 24,466 24,466
202311 (Paradise Valley)59,346 171,004 230,350
202312 (Downtown Business District)13,973 18,321 32,294 202313 (North Cordelia)8,556 171,195 179,751
Total $243,163 $708,025 $951,188
These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and general benefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule, as discussed below.

If any of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are not approved, all landscaping and lighting maintenance services in each respective community could continue to be funded by assessments levied under the existing LLMDs if services are reduced to a level that can be supported by available assessment revenue from year to year, after applicable loan payments are made.

On April 18, 2023, the council initiated formation proceedings, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Reports, and appointed June 6, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing for the Proposed Districts.

Subsequently, staff prepared a modified engineer’s report (Modified Engineer’s Report) for Proposed District No. 20233 (Waterman Highlands) to update the “Waterman Boulevard feet of roadway with landscaping improvements” measurement on page 13 from 1,136 feet to 1,600 feet. This update resulted in a 1.95%, or $3,095, increase to the overall general benefit portion and a proportionate reduction in total property owner assessments. The ballot tabulation will proceed using the ballots that have already been mailed to property owners since the reduction in assessments is proportional for every parcel in the district. The Modified Engineer’s Report is attached to the resolution for the Proposed District as Exhibit B.

Additionally, on May 16, 2023, the council adopted a resolution approving a fiveyear assessment levy schedule (Levy Schedule) for Proposed District No. 202312 (Downtown Business District) to minimize the initial financial impact to the property owners in Proposed District No. 202312. Pursuant to the Levy Schedule, the levy of the assessments and general benefit contribution for FY 20232024 shall be limited to 30% of the maximum assessment and general benefit contribution set forth in the Engineer’s Report for FY 20232024, with the expenditures for the improvements to correspond with the reduced revenues. The levies and general benefit contributions in each of FY 20242025 through FY 20272028 shall be in amounts that are not more than an additional 30% of the assessment levied in the prior fiscal year.

The next step in the formation process is to hold a public hearing regarding the formation of the Proposed Districts and the levy and collection of assessments within the Proposed Districts for FY 20232024. At the public hearing, the council must consider all protests or objections to the proposed assessments and any person shall be permitted to present written or oral testimony. An assessment ballot may be submitted, changed, or withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the council meeting will be continued to June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. Commencing on June 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in the City Council Chamber, the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer will tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The tabulation will occur in public view so as to permit all interested persons to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process.

The council will reconvene on June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. to declare the results of the ballot proceedings and consider the resolutions.

For each of the Proposed Districts, a majority protest will exist if assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots will be weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon the identified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted. If no majority protest exists for a Proposed District, the council may adopt the applicable resolution to declare the results of the assessment ballot proceedings, approve the Engineer’s Report, as filed or modified, order the formation of the district, and confirm the FY 20232024 assessments for the district. If a majority protest exists for any Proposed District, council must abandon proceedings for that district and take no further action with respect to the Proposed District pursuant to Article XIII D.

Proposed Resolutions 2023139 through 2023147 and accompanying Exhibits A and B can be found on Agenda Item No. 17 on this June 6, 2023, agenda packet.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Packet Page 326 of 839

Agenda Item No: 17.AGENDA REPORTDATE:June 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and City CouncilFROM:David Gassaway, City ManagerSUBJECT:Public Hearing to Consider Resolutions 2023139 Through 2023147 of the CityCouncil of the City of Fairfield Declaring the Results of the Assessment BallotProceedings, Approving the Fiscal Year 20232024 Engineer’s Reports, Ordering theFormation of the Districts, Confirming the Assessments For Fiscal Year 20232024,and Taking Related Actions in Connection with Proposed City of Fairfield Landscapingand Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 20231 (Gateway), 20233 (WatermanHighlands), 20235 (Rancho Solano), 20236 (Peppertree), 20237 (Rolling Hills),20238 (Kolob Estates), 202311 (Paradise Valley), 202312 (Downtown BusinessDistrict), and 202313 (North Cordelia)RECOMMENDED ACTIONHold public hearing.STATEMENT OF ISSUEExisting Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, No. 5 – Rancho Solano, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates,No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia donot generate enough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance servicescurrently being provided. The council has initiated proceedings for the formation of new maintenancedistricts with higher assessment rates that will support the current level of services. In the absence ofmajority protests, approval of these resolutions will, for each respective district, declare the results ofthe assessment balloting proceeding, approve the engineer’s report, as filed or as modified, order theformation of the district, confirm the assessments against the parcels within the district for fiscal year(FY) 20232024, and authorize staff to take the necessary related actions.DISCUSSIONThe City formed 16 existing LLMDs under the State of California Landscaping and Lighting Act of1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. (Act), to provide a funding sourcefor the maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements within the various developmentareas. During FY 20212022, staff identified that LLMDs, No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No.5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob, No. 11 – Paradise ValleyNorth, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia were projected to have afund balance and budget deficit in the next onetothree fiscal years if services were provided at thesame levels as previous fiscal years. Due to the existing maximum assessment rates in each district,the total assessments generated in each district were insufficient to support services at the existinglevels. Staff informed council that a community engagement and assessment balloting process would beconducted, in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known asProposition 218, during FY 20222023 to propose to property owners the formation of newmaintenance districts (Proposed Districts) with higher assessments that would adequately fundservices. Each Proposed District is proposed with assessments rates that are subject to annualincreases equal to the annual change in the consumer price index (CPI), not to exceed 3%, asdescribed below. The engineer’s report for each Proposed District includes a base budget thatincludes funding for regular landscape maintenance services, irrigation services and system repair,regular tree pruning, streetlight service and maintenance in applicable districts, administrative services,contingency spending, and annual reserves. If the Proposed Districts are formed and the assessmentsconfirmed, the council is authorized to levy assessments in FY 20232024 and subsequent fiscal yearsin amounts which are less than or the same as the assessments set forth in the Engineer’s Report, asincreased each year by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for allUrban Consumers, for the San FranciscoOaklandHayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually,beginning July 1, 2024 (Maximum Assessments), without undertaking another balloting proceedingpursuant to Proposition 218.To minimize the disruption of services while the community engagement and Proposition 218 ballotingprocess was carried out, council issued General Fund loans of $410,000 to LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills,$175,000 to LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, and $151,000 to LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia onMay 3, 2022, and loans of $165,000 to LLMD No. 1 – Gateway, $28,000 to LLMD No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, $28,000 to LLMD No. 6 – Peppertree, and $40,000 to LLMD No. 12 – Downtown BusinessDistrict on August 16, 2022. LLMDs No. 5 – Smith Ranch and No. 8 – Kolob Estates had sufficient fundbalance and incoming assessment revenues to maintain services during FY 20222023 and did notrequire a loan.The City hired NBS Government Finance Group (NBS or Assessment Engineer) to conduct anengineering and financial analysis of the Proposed Districts and to develop nine engineer’s reports(Engineer’s Reports), as required by the Act and Article XIII D. The city also hired CivicMic, a subsidiaryof NBS, to assist with community outreach efforts. Since early 2022, staff have engaged with property owners in each district to inform them of the fundingshortfall and the Proposed Districts. The robust outreach and communication framework included thegathering of data and dissemination of critical information through postcards and flyers, fact sheets,surveys, emails, social media postings, notifications and articles on the City website, inperson andvirtual community meetings, and popup question and answer sessions at various locations throughoutthe city. CivicMic created a website where residents could find general information about LLMDs and theoverall Proposition 218 balloting process, historical facts about their current district and the proposedfunding solution, geographic information system (GIS) boundary maps, recordings of past staffpresentations, updates on the Proposed District formation progress, the latest news and meetingannouncements, and parcelspecific proposed assessment rates. The CivicMic website served as theprimary mode of communication during the engagement process and property owners wereencouraged to sign up for email notifications to ensure they received timely updates. Property owners also had the opportunity to join working groups, which were an assembly of individualsfrom each Proposed District tasked with providing input on the project process, assisting with thegathering of data and delivery of information to community members, and encouraging other propertyowners in their district to participate in the balloting process. Since mid2022, Public Works staff worked with NBS to develop the Engineer’s Reports to support theformation of the Proposed Districts. Staff and NBS researched county records, building permit anddevelopment records, existing traffic data, and historical operational and administrative matters, suchas budgets and previous council actions related to each district. Staff and NBS also identified districtboundary lines and maintenance areas, developed critical metrics to inform the proposed assessmentrates and district budgets, and prepared the required legal documents to initiate the formationprocess. Preliminary draft Engineer’s Reports were provided to property owners in each Proposed District forreview in February 2023, except for the report for the Downtown Business District which was releasedin March 2023 due to the additional research required for that district. The council preliminarilyapproved the Engineer’s Reports in April 2023, and will consider final approval of the Engineer’sReports following the public hearing. The Engineer’s Reports are attached to the resolutions as ExhibitB.If the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are approved, all landscaping and lighting maintenanceservices in each respective community would be funded by assessments levied against the parcelswithin the Proposed District, commencing July 1, 2023, and the council would undertake proceedings todissolve the existing maintenance districts. However, proceedings for the dissolution of the existingLLMDs that received a General Fund loan could be deferred until FY 20282029 to allow the council tocontinue levying assessments against the parcels within the existing LLMD only in the amount neededto pay the annual loan installment. Each loan was issued at 0% interest with a fiveyear repayment term,commencing in FY 20232024 and concluding at the end of FY 20272028. In accordance with Article XIII D, approval of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates will obligatethe City to pay assessments for all Cityowned property within a Proposed District that receives aspecial benefit from the district improvements. In addition, the City will provide a contribution for generalbenefits conferred on real property located in each Proposed District or to the public at large. Theassessments and contributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI,not to exceed 3%. The total General Fund impact for FY 20232024 is as follows: District No.Assessment Contribution Total20231 (Gateway)0 83,280 83,28020233 (Waterman Highlands)1,937 32,127 34,06420235 (Rancho Solano)152,115 61,878 213,99320236 (Peppertree)100 16,480 16,58020237 (Rolling Hills)7,136 129,274 136,41020238 (Kolob Estates)0 24,466 24,466202311 (Paradise Valley)59,346 171,004 230,350202312 (Downtown Business District)13,973 18,321 32,294202313 (North Cordelia)8,556 171,195 179,751Total$243,163 $708,025 $951,188These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and generalbenefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule, as discussed below. If any of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are not approved, all landscaping and lightingmaintenance services in each respective community could continue to be funded by assessmentslevied under the existing LLMDs if services are reduced to a level that can be supported by availableassessment revenue from year to year, after applicable loan payments are made.On April 18, 2023, the council initiated formation proceedings, preliminarily approved the Engineer’sReports, and appointed June 6, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing for theProposed Districts. Subsequently, staff prepared a modified engineer’s report (Modified Engineer’s Report) for ProposedDistrict No. 20233 (Waterman Highlands) to update the “Waterman Boulevard feet of roadway withlandscaping improvements” measurement on page 13 from 1,136 feet to 1,600 feet. This updateresulted in a 1.95%, or $3,095, increase to the overall general benefit portion and a proportionatereduction in total property owner assessments. The ballot tabulation will proceed using the ballots thathave already been mailed to property owners since the reduction in assessments is proportional forevery parcel in the district. The Modified Engineer’s Report is attached to the resolution for theProposed District as Exhibit B. Additionally, on May 16, 2023, the council adopted a resolution approving a fiveyear assessment levyschedule (Levy Schedule) for Proposed District No. 202312 (Downtown Business District) to minimizethe initial financial impact to the property owners in Proposed District No. 202312. Pursuant to the LevySchedule, the levy of the assessments and general benefit contribution for FY 20232024 shall belimited to 30% of the maximum assessment and general benefit contribution set forth in the Engineer’sReport for FY 20232024, with the expenditures for the improvements to correspond with the reducedrevenues. The levies and general benefit contributions in each of FY 20242025 through FY 20272028shall be in amounts that are not more than an additional 30% of the assessment levied in the prior fiscalyear. The next step in the formation process is to hold a public hearing regarding the formation of theProposed Districts and the levy and collection of assessments within the Proposed Districts for FY20232024. At the public hearing, the council must consider all protests or objections to the proposedassessments and any person shall be permitted to present written or oral testimony. An assessmentballot may be submitted, changed, or withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot prior to theconclusion of the public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the council meeting will becontinued to June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. Commencing on June 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in the City CouncilChamber, the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer will tabulate the assessment ballots submittedand not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The tabulation will occur in public viewso as to permit all interested persons to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process.The council will reconvene on June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. to declare the results of the ballot proceedingsand consider the resolutions. For each of the Proposed Districts, a majority protest will exist if assessment ballots submitted inopposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating theballots, the ballots will be weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon theidentified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted. If no majority protest exists for aProposed District, the council may adopt the applicable resolution to declare the results of theassessment ballot proceedings, approve the Engineer’s Report, as filed or modified, order theformation of the district, and confirm the FY 20232024 assessments for the district. If a majority protestexists for any Proposed District, council must abandon proceedings for that district and take no furtheraction with respect to the Proposed District pursuant to Article XIII D.Proposed Resolutions 2023139 through 2023147 and accompanying Exhibits A and B canbe found on Agenda Item No. 17 on this June 6, 2023, agenda packet.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
If all nine Proposed Districts are approved, the total General Fund (Fund 101) impact for FY 20232024 is $951,188, which includes $243,163 in annual assessments and $708,025 in annual contributions.

These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and general benefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule. The assessments and contributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI, not to exceed 3%.

PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION
Information about the Proposed Districts was presented directly to the property owners of the Proposed Districts at various community meetings, through various mailers, social media posts, and on the City’s website and CivicMic website since January 2022. All information was also shared with the Rancho Solano and Rolling Hills landscape committees, the Rancho Solano, Paradise Valley, and North Cordelia homeowners’ associations, and the Rolling Hills Neighborhood Network.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
The council may choose not to form the Proposed Districts. The council may undertake proceedings to levy assessments within the nine existing LLMDs. However, the existing LLMDs do not generate enough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance services currently being provided.

STAFF CONTACT
Chris Lewis, Sr. Management Analyst
(707) 4287089
[email protected]
COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney's Office
REVIEWERS:

Reviewer Action Date
Panganiban, Ryan Approved 5/23/2023 8:39 PM
Kaushal, Paul Approved 5/24/2023 12:37 PM
Beavers, Esther Approved 5/24/2023 12:49 PM
Beavers, Esther Approved 5/24/2023 12:53 PM
Packet Page 327 of 839

Agenda Item No: 18.

AGENDA REPORT
DATE:June 6, 2023
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:David Gassaway, City Manager
SUBJECT:Tabulation of Ballots Regarding Resolutions 2023139 Through 2023147 of the City Council of the City of Fairfield Declaring the Results of the Assessment Ballot Proceedings, Approving the Fiscal Year 20232024 Engineer’s Reports, Ordering the Formation of the Districts, Confirming the Assessments For Fiscal Year 20232024, and Taking Related Actions in Connection with Proposed City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 20231 (Gateway), 20233 (Waterman Highlands), 20235 (Rancho Solano), 20236 (Peppertree), 20237 (Rolling Hills), 20238 (Kolob Estates), 202311 (Paradise Valley), 202312 (Downtown Business District), and 202313 (North Cordelia)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Conduct tabulation of ballots and adopt resolutions.

Packet Page 328 of 839

Packet Page 329 of 839

The council will reconvene on June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. to declare the results of the ballot proceedings and consider the resolutions.

These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and general Packet Page 331 of 839

Agenda Item No: 18.AGENDA REPORTDATE:June 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and City CouncilFROM:David Gassaway, City ManagerSUBJECT:Tabulation of Ballots Regarding Resolutions 2023139 Through 2023147 of the CityCouncil of the City of Fairfield Declaring the Results of the Assessment BallotProceedings, Approving the Fiscal Year 20232024 Engineer’s Reports, Ordering theFormation of the Districts, Confirming the Assessments For Fiscal Year 20232024,and Taking Related Actions in Connection with Proposed City of Fairfield Landscapingand Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 20231 (Gateway), 20233 (WatermanHighlands), 20235 (Rancho Solano), 20236 (Peppertree), 20237 (Rolling Hills),20238 (Kolob Estates), 202311 (Paradise Valley), 202312 (Downtown BusinessDistrict), and 202313 (North Cordelia)RECOMMENDED ACTIONConduct tabulation of ballots and adopt resolutions.STATEMENT OF ISSUEExisting Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, No. 5 – Rancho Solano, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates,No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia donot generate enough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance servicescurrently being provided. The council has initiated proceedings for the formation of new maintenancedistricts with higher assessment rates that will support the current level of services. In the absence ofmajority protests, approval of these resolutions will, for each respective district, declare the results ofthe assessment balloting proceeding, approve the engineer’s report, as filed or as modified, order theformation of the district, confirm the assessments against the parcels within the district for fiscal year(FY) 20232024, and authorize staff to take the necessary related actions.DISCUSSIONThe City formed 16 existing LLMDs under the State of California Landscaping and Lighting Act of1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. (Act), to provide a funding sourcefor the maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements within the various developmentareas. During FY 20212022, staff identified that LLMDs, No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No.5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob, No. 11 – Paradise ValleyNorth, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia were projected to have afund balance and budget deficit in the next onetothree fiscal years if services were provided at thesame levels as previous fiscal years. Due to the existing maximum assessment rates in each district,the total assessments generated in each district were insufficient to support services at the existinglevels. Staff informed council that a community engagement and assessment balloting process would beconducted, in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known asProposition 218, during FY 20222023 to propose to property owners the formation of newmaintenance districts (Proposed Districts) with higher assessments that would adequately fundservices. Each Proposed District is proposed with assessments rates that are subject to annualincreases equal to the annual change in the consumer price index (CPI), not to exceed 3%, asdescribed below. The engineer’s report for each Proposed District includes a base budget thatincludes funding for regular landscape maintenance services, irrigation services and system repair,regular tree pruning, streetlight service and maintenance in applicable districts, administrative services,contingency spending, and annual reserves. If the Proposed Districts are formed and the assessmentsconfirmed, the council is authorized to levy assessments in FY 20232024 and subsequent fiscal yearsin amounts which are less than or the same as the assessments set forth in the Engineer’s Report, asincreased each year by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for allUrban Consumers, for the San FranciscoOaklandHayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually,beginning July 1, 2024 (Maximum Assessments), without undertaking another balloting proceedingpursuant to Proposition 218.To minimize the disruption of services while the community engagement and Proposition 218 ballotingprocess was carried out, council issued General Fund loans of $410,000 to LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills,$175,000 to LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, and $151,000 to LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia onMay 3, 2022, and loans of $165,000 to LLMD No. 1 – Gateway, $28,000 to LLMD No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, $28,000 to LLMD No. 6 – Peppertree, and $40,000 to LLMD No. 12 – Downtown BusinessDistrict on August 16, 2022. LLMDs No. 5 – Smith Ranch and No. 8 – Kolob Estates had sufficient fundbalance and incoming assessment revenues to maintain services during FY 20222023 and did notrequire a loan.The City hired NBS Government Finance Group (NBS or Assessment Engineer) to conduct anengineering and financial analysis of the Proposed Districts and to develop nine engineer’s reports(Engineer’s Reports), as required by the Act and Article XIII D. The city also hired CivicMic, a subsidiaryof NBS, to assist with community outreach efforts. Since early 2022, staff have engaged with property owners in each district to inform them of the fundingshortfall and the Proposed Districts. The robust outreach and communication framework included thegathering of data and dissemination of critical information through postcards and flyers, fact sheets,surveys, emails, social media postings, notifications and articles on the City website, inperson andvirtual community meetings, and popup question and answer sessions at various locations throughoutthe city. CivicMic created a website where residents could find general information about LLMDs and theoverall Proposition 218 balloting process, historical facts about their current district and the proposedfunding solution, geographic information system (GIS) boundary maps, recordings of past staffpresentations, updates on the Proposed District formation progress, the latest news and meetingannouncements, and parcelspecific proposed assessment rates. The CivicMic website served as theprimary mode of communication during the engagement process and property owners wereencouraged to sign up for email notifications to ensure they received timely updates. Property owners also had the opportunity to join working groups, which were an assembly of individualsfrom each Proposed District tasked with providing input on the project process, assisting with thegathering of data and delivery of information to community members, and encouraging other propertyowners in their district to participate in the balloting process. Since mid2022, Public Works staff worked with NBS to develop the Engineer’s Reports to support theformation of the Proposed Districts. Staff and NBS researched county records, building permit anddevelopment records, existing traffic data, and historical operational and administrative matters, suchas budgets and previous council actions related to each district. Staff and NBS also identified districtboundary lines and maintenance areas, developed critical metrics to inform the proposed assessmentrates and district budgets, and prepared the required legal documents to initiate the formationprocess. Preliminary draft Engineer’s Reports were provided to property owners in each Proposed District forreview in February 2023, except for the report for the Downtown Business District which was releasedin March 2023 due to the additional research required for that district. The council preliminarilyapproved the Engineer’s Reports in April 2023, and will consider final approval of the Engineer’sReports following the public hearing. The Engineer’s Reports are attached to the resolutions as ExhibitB.If the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are approved, all landscaping and lighting maintenanceservices in each respective community would be funded by assessments levied against the parcelswithin the Proposed District, commencing July 1, 2023, and the council would undertake proceedings todissolve the existing maintenance districts. However, proceedings for the dissolution of the existingLLMDs that received a General Fund loan could be deferred until FY 20282029 to allow the council tocontinue levying assessments against the parcels within the existing LLMD only in the amount neededto pay the annual loan installment. Each loan was issued at 0% interest with a fiveyear repayment term,commencing in FY 20232024 and concluding at the end of FY 20272028. In accordance with Article XIII D, approval of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates will obligatethe City to pay assessments for all Cityowned property within a Proposed District that receives aspecial benefit from the district improvements. In addition, the City will provide a contribution for generalbenefits conferred on real property located in each Proposed District or to the public at large. Theassessments and contributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI,not to exceed 3%. The total General Fund impact for FY 20232024 is as follows: District No.Assessment Contribution Total20231 (Gateway)0 83,280 83,28020233 (Waterman Highlands)1,937 32,127 34,06420235 (Rancho Solano)152,115 61,878 213,99320236 (Peppertree)100 16,480 16,58020237 (Rolling Hills)7,136 129,274 136,41020238 (Kolob Estates)0 24,466 24,466202311 (Paradise Valley)59,346 171,004 230,350202312 (Downtown Business District)13,973 18,321 32,294202313 (North Cordelia)8,556 171,195 179,751Total$243,163 $708,025 $951,188These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and generalbenefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule, as discussed below. If any of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are not approved, all landscaping and lightingmaintenance services in each respective community could continue to be funded by assessmentslevied under the existing LLMDs if services are reduced to a level that can be supported by availableassessment revenue from year to year, after applicable loan payments are made.On April 18, 2023, the council initiated formation proceedings, preliminarily approved the Engineer’sReports, and appointed June 6, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing for theProposed Districts. Subsequently, staff prepared a modified engineer’s report (Modified Engineer’s Report) for ProposedDistrict No. 20233 (Waterman Highlands) to update the “Waterman Boulevard feet of roadway withlandscaping improvements” measurement on page 13 from 1,136 feet to 1,600 feet. This updateresulted in a 1.95%, or $3,095, increase to the overall general benefit portion and a proportionatereduction in total property owner assessments. The ballot tabulation will proceed using the ballots thathave already been mailed to property owners since the reduction in assessments is proportional forevery parcel in the district. The Modified Engineer’s Report is attached to the resolution for theProposed District as Exhibit B. Additionally, on May 16, 2023, the council adopted a resolution approving a fiveyear assessment levyschedule (Levy Schedule) for Proposed District No. 202312 (Downtown Business District) to minimizethe initial financial impact to the property owners in Proposed District No. 202312. Pursuant to the LevySchedule, the levy of the assessments and general benefit contribution for FY 20232024 shall belimited to 30% of the maximum assessment and general benefit contribution set forth in the Engineer’sReport for FY 20232024, with the expenditures for the improvements to correspond with the reducedrevenues. The levies and general benefit contributions in each of FY 20242025 through FY 20272028shall be in amounts that are not more than an additional 30% of the assessment levied in the prior fiscalyear. The next step in the formation process is to hold a public hearing regarding the formation of theProposed Districts and the levy and collection of assessments within the Proposed Districts for FY20232024. At the public hearing, the council must consider all protests or objections to the proposedassessments and any person shall be permitted to present written or oral testimony. An assessmentballot may be submitted, changed, or withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot prior to theconclusion of the public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the council meeting will becontinued to June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. Commencing on June 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in the City CouncilChamber, the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer will tabulate the assessment ballots submittedand not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The tabulation will occur in public viewso as to permit all interested persons to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process.The council will reconvene on June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. to declare the results of the ballot proceedingsand consider the resolutions. For each of the Proposed Districts, a majority protest will exist if assessment ballots submitted inopposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating theballots, the ballots will be weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon theidentified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted. If no majority protest exists for aProposed District, the council may adopt the applicable resolution to declare the results of theassessment ballot proceedings, approve the Engineer’s Report, as filed or modified, order theformation of the district, and confirm the FY 20232024 assessments for the district. If a majority protestexists for any Proposed District, council must abandon proceedings for that district and take no furtheraction with respect to the Proposed District pursuant to Article XIII D.FINANCIAL IMPACTIf all nine Proposed Districts are approved, the total General Fund (Fund 101) impact for FY 20232024 is $951,188, which includes $243,163 in annual assessments and $708,025 in annual contributions.

STAFF CONTACT
Chris Lewis, Sr. Management Analyst
(707) 4287089
[email protected]
COORDINATED WITH
City Attorney's Office
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution 20231 Gateway
Attachment 2: Proposed Resolution 20233 Waterman
Attachment 3: Proposed Resolution 20235 Rancho Solano Attachment 4: Proposed Resolution 20236 Peppertree
Attachment 5: Proposed Resolution 20237 Rolling Hills Attachment 6: Proposed Resolution 20238 Kolob Estates Attachment 7: Proposed Resolution 202311 Paradise Valley Attachment 8: Proposed Resolution 202312 Downtown Business District Attachment 9: Proposed Resolution 202313 North Cordelia Attachment 10: Exhibit A 20231 Gateway
Attachment 11: Exhibit A 20233 Waterman
Attachment 12: Exhibit A 20235 Rancho Solano
Attachment 13: Exhibit A 20236 Peppertree
Attachment 14: Exhibit A 20237 Rolling Hills
Attachment 15: Exhibit A 20238 Kolob Estates
Attachment 16: Exhibit A 202311 Paradise Valley
Attachment 17: Exhibit A 202312 Downtown Business District Attachment 18: Exhibit A 202313 North Cordelia
Attachment 19: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20231 Gateway Attachment 20: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20233 Waterman Attachment 21: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20235 Rancho Solano Attachment 22: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20236 Peppertree Packet Page 332 of 839

Agenda Item No: 18.AGENDA REPORTDATE:June 6, 2023 TO:Mayor and City CouncilFROM:David Gassaway, City ManagerSUBJECT:Tabulation of Ballots Regarding Resolutions 2023139 Through 2023147 of the CityCouncil of the City of Fairfield Declaring the Results of the Assessment BallotProceedings, Approving the Fiscal Year 20232024 Engineer’s Reports, Ordering theFormation of the Districts, Confirming the Assessments For Fiscal Year 20232024,and Taking Related Actions in Connection with Proposed City of Fairfield Landscapingand Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 20231 (Gateway), 20233 (WatermanHighlands), 20235 (Rancho Solano), 20236 (Peppertree), 20237 (Rolling Hills),20238 (Kolob Estates), 202311 (Paradise Valley), 202312 (Downtown BusinessDistrict), and 202313 (North Cordelia)RECOMMENDED ACTIONConduct tabulation of ballots and adopt resolutions.STATEMENT OF ISSUEExisting Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMDs) No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, No. 5 – Rancho Solano, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob Estates,No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia donot generate enough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance servicescurrently being provided. The council has initiated proceedings for the formation of new maintenancedistricts with higher assessment rates that will support the current level of services. In the absence ofmajority protests, approval of these resolutions will, for each respective district, declare the results ofthe assessment balloting proceeding, approve the engineer’s report, as filed or as modified, order theformation of the district, confirm the assessments against the parcels within the district for fiscal year(FY) 20232024, and authorize staff to take the necessary related actions.DISCUSSIONThe City formed 16 existing LLMDs under the State of California Landscaping and Lighting Act of1972, California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. (Act), to provide a funding sourcefor the maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements within the various developmentareas. During FY 20212022, staff identified that LLMDs, No. 1 – Gateway, No. 3 – Waterman Highlands, No.5 – Smith Ranch, No. 6 – Peppertree, No. 7 – Rolling Hills, No. 8 – Kolob, No. 11 – Paradise ValleyNorth, No. 12 – Downtown Business District, and No. 13 – North Cordelia were projected to have afund balance and budget deficit in the next onetothree fiscal years if services were provided at thesame levels as previous fiscal years. Due to the existing maximum assessment rates in each district,the total assessments generated in each district were insufficient to support services at the existinglevels. Staff informed council that a community engagement and assessment balloting process would beconducted, in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Article XIII D), also known asProposition 218, during FY 20222023 to propose to property owners the formation of newmaintenance districts (Proposed Districts) with higher assessments that would adequately fundservices. Each Proposed District is proposed with assessments rates that are subject to annualincreases equal to the annual change in the consumer price index (CPI), not to exceed 3%, asdescribed below. The engineer’s report for each Proposed District includes a base budget thatincludes funding for regular landscape maintenance services, irrigation services and system repair,regular tree pruning, streetlight service and maintenance in applicable districts, administrative services,contingency spending, and annual reserves. If the Proposed Districts are formed and the assessmentsconfirmed, the council is authorized to levy assessments in FY 20232024 and subsequent fiscal yearsin amounts which are less than or the same as the assessments set forth in the Engineer’s Report, asincreased each year by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for allUrban Consumers, for the San FranciscoOaklandHayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually,beginning July 1, 2024 (Maximum Assessments), without undertaking another balloting proceedingpursuant to Proposition 218.To minimize the disruption of services while the community engagement and Proposition 218 ballotingprocess was carried out, council issued General Fund loans of $410,000 to LLMD No. 7 – Rolling Hills,$175,000 to LLMD No. 11 – Paradise Valley North, and $151,000 to LLMD No. 13 – North Cordelia onMay 3, 2022, and loans of $165,000 to LLMD No. 1 – Gateway, $28,000 to LLMD No. 3 – WatermanHighlands, $28,000 to LLMD No. 6 – Peppertree, and $40,000 to LLMD No. 12 – Downtown BusinessDistrict on August 16, 2022. LLMDs No. 5 – Smith Ranch and No. 8 – Kolob Estates had sufficient fundbalance and incoming assessment revenues to maintain services during FY 20222023 and did notrequire a loan.The City hired NBS Government Finance Group (NBS or Assessment Engineer) to conduct anengineering and financial analysis of the Proposed Districts and to develop nine engineer’s reports(Engineer’s Reports), as required by the Act and Article XIII D. The city also hired CivicMic, a subsidiaryof NBS, to assist with community outreach efforts. Since early 2022, staff have engaged with property owners in each district to inform them of the fundingshortfall and the Proposed Districts. The robust outreach and communication framework included thegathering of data and dissemination of critical information through postcards and flyers, fact sheets,surveys, emails, social media postings, notifications and articles on the City website, inperson andvirtual community meetings, and popup question and answer sessions at various locations throughoutthe city. CivicMic created a website where residents could find general information about LLMDs and theoverall Proposition 218 balloting process, historical facts about their current district and the proposedfunding solution, geographic information system (GIS) boundary maps, recordings of past staffpresentations, updates on the Proposed District formation progress, the latest news and meetingannouncements, and parcelspecific proposed assessment rates. The CivicMic website served as theprimary mode of communication during the engagement process and property owners wereencouraged to sign up for email notifications to ensure they received timely updates. Property owners also had the opportunity to join working groups, which were an assembly of individualsfrom each Proposed District tasked with providing input on the project process, assisting with thegathering of data and delivery of information to community members, and encouraging other propertyowners in their district to participate in the balloting process. Since mid2022, Public Works staff worked with NBS to develop the Engineer’s Reports to support theformation of the Proposed Districts. Staff and NBS researched county records, building permit anddevelopment records, existing traffic data, and historical operational and administrative matters, suchas budgets and previous council actions related to each district. Staff and NBS also identified districtboundary lines and maintenance areas, developed critical metrics to inform the proposed assessmentrates and district budgets, and prepared the required legal documents to initiate the formationprocess. Preliminary draft Engineer’s Reports were provided to property owners in each Proposed District forreview in February 2023, except for the report for the Downtown Business District which was releasedin March 2023 due to the additional research required for that district. The council preliminarilyapproved the Engineer’s Reports in April 2023, and will consider final approval of the Engineer’sReports following the public hearing. The Engineer’s Reports are attached to the resolutions as ExhibitB.If the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are approved, all landscaping and lighting maintenanceservices in each respective community would be funded by assessments levied against the parcelswithin the Proposed District, commencing July 1, 2023, and the council would undertake proceedings todissolve the existing maintenance districts. However, proceedings for the dissolution of the existingLLMDs that received a General Fund loan could be deferred until FY 20282029 to allow the council tocontinue levying assessments against the parcels within the existing LLMD only in the amount neededto pay the annual loan installment. Each loan was issued at 0% interest with a fiveyear repayment term,commencing in FY 20232024 and concluding at the end of FY 20272028. In accordance with Article XIII D, approval of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates will obligatethe City to pay assessments for all Cityowned property within a Proposed District that receives aspecial benefit from the district improvements. In addition, the City will provide a contribution for generalbenefits conferred on real property located in each Proposed District or to the public at large. Theassessments and contributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI,not to exceed 3%. The total General Fund impact for FY 20232024 is as follows: District No.Assessment Contribution Total20231 (Gateway)0 83,280 83,28020233 (Waterman Highlands)1,937 32,127 34,06420235 (Rancho Solano)152,115 61,878 213,99320236 (Peppertree)100 16,480 16,58020237 (Rolling Hills)7,136 129,274 136,41020238 (Kolob Estates)0 24,466 24,466202311 (Paradise Valley)59,346 171,004 230,350202312 (Downtown Business District)13,973 18,321 32,294202313 (North Cordelia)8,556 171,195 179,751Total$243,163 $708,025 $951,188These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and generalbenefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule, as discussed below. If any of the Proposed Districts and assessment rates are not approved, all landscaping and lightingmaintenance services in each respective community could continue to be funded by assessmentslevied under the existing LLMDs if services are reduced to a level that can be supported by availableassessment revenue from year to year, after applicable loan payments are made.On April 18, 2023, the council initiated formation proceedings, preliminarily approved the Engineer’sReports, and appointed June 6, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing for theProposed Districts. Subsequently, staff prepared a modified engineer’s report (Modified Engineer’s Report) for ProposedDistrict No. 20233 (Waterman Highlands) to update the “Waterman Boulevard feet of roadway withlandscaping improvements” measurement on page 13 from 1,136 feet to 1,600 feet. This updateresulted in a 1.95%, or $3,095, increase to the overall general benefit portion and a proportionatereduction in total property owner assessments. The ballot tabulation will proceed using the ballots thathave already been mailed to property owners since the reduction in assessments is proportional forevery parcel in the district. The Modified Engineer’s Report is attached to the resolution for theProposed District as Exhibit B. Additionally, on May 16, 2023, the council adopted a resolution approving a fiveyear assessment levyschedule (Levy Schedule) for Proposed District No. 202312 (Downtown Business District) to minimizethe initial financial impact to the property owners in Proposed District No. 202312. Pursuant to the LevySchedule, the levy of the assessments and general benefit contribution for FY 20232024 shall belimited to 30% of the maximum assessment and general benefit contribution set forth in the Engineer’sReport for FY 20232024, with the expenditures for the improvements to correspond with the reducedrevenues. The levies and general benefit contributions in each of FY 20242025 through FY 20272028shall be in amounts that are not more than an additional 30% of the assessment levied in the prior fiscalyear. The next step in the formation process is to hold a public hearing regarding the formation of theProposed Districts and the levy and collection of assessments within the Proposed Districts for FY20232024. At the public hearing, the council must consider all protests or objections to the proposedassessments and any person shall be permitted to present written or oral testimony. An assessmentballot may be submitted, changed, or withdrawn by the person who submitted the ballot prior to theconclusion of the public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the council meeting will becontinued to June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. Commencing on June 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in the City CouncilChamber, the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer will tabulate the assessment ballots submittedand not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The tabulation will occur in public viewso as to permit all interested persons to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process.The council will reconvene on June 7, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. to declare the results of the ballot proceedingsand consider the resolutions. For each of the Proposed Districts, a majority protest will exist if assessment ballots submitted inopposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating theballots, the ballots will be weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon theidentified parcel for which each assessment ballot was submitted. If no majority protest exists for aProposed District, the council may adopt the applicable resolution to declare the results of theassessment ballot proceedings, approve the Engineer’s Report, as filed or modified, order theformation of the district, and confirm the FY 20232024 assessments for the district. If a majority protestexists for any Proposed District, council must abandon proceedings for that district and take no furtheraction with respect to the Proposed District pursuant to Article XIII D.FINANCIAL IMPACTIf all nine Proposed Districts are approved, the total General Fund (Fund 101) impact for FY 20232024is $951,188, which includes $243,163 in annual assessments and $708,025 in annual contributions.These totals reflect the updates to Proposed District No. 20233 and the assessment and generalbenefit contribution for Proposed District No. 202312 under the Levy Schedule. The assessments andcontributions are subject to annual increases equal to the annual change in the CPI, not to exceed 3%.PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATIONInformation about the Proposed Districts was presented directly to the property owners of the ProposedDistricts at various community meetings, through various mailers, social media posts, and on the City’swebsite and CivicMic website since January 2022. All information was also shared with the RanchoSolano and Rolling Hills landscape committees, the Rancho Solano, Paradise Valley, and NorthCordelia homeowners’ associations, and the Rolling Hills Neighborhood Network.ALTERNATIVE ACTIONThe council may choose not to form the Proposed Districts. The council may undertake proceedings tolevy assessments within the nine existing LLMDs. However, the existing LLMDs do not generateenough revenue to support the level of landscaping and lighting maintenance services currently beingprovided.STAFF CONTACTChris Lewis, Sr. Management Analyst(707) 428[email protected] WITHCity Attorney's OfficeATTACHMENTS:DescriptionAttachment 1: Proposed Resolution 20231 GatewayAttachment 2: Proposed Resolution 20233 WatermanAttachment 3: Proposed Resolution 20235 Rancho SolanoAttachment 4: Proposed Resolution 20236 PeppertreeAttachment 5: Proposed Resolution 20237 Rolling HillsAttachment 6: Proposed Resolution 20238 Kolob EstatesAttachment 7: Proposed Resolution 202311 Paradise ValleyAttachment 8: Proposed Resolution 202312 Downtown Business DistrictAttachment 9: Proposed Resolution 202313 North CordeliaAttachment 10: Exhibit A 20231 GatewayAttachment 11: Exhibit A 20233 WatermanAttachment 12: Exhibit A 20235 Rancho SolanoAttachment 13: Exhibit A 20236 PeppertreeAttachment 14: Exhibit A 20237 Rolling HillsAttachment 15: Exhibit A 20238 Kolob EstatesAttachment 16: Exhibit A 202311 Paradise ValleyAttachment 17: Exhibit A 202312 Downtown Business DistrictAttachment 18: Exhibit A 202313 North CordeliaAttachment 19: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20231 GatewayAttachment 20: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20233 Waterman Attachment 21: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20235 Rancho Solano Attachment 22: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20236 Peppertree Attachment 23: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20237 Rolling Hills Attachment 24: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 20238 Kolob Estates Attachment 25: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 202311 Paradise Valley Attachment 26: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 202312 Downtown Business District Attachment 27: Exhibit B Engineer's Report 202313 North Cordelia REVIEWERS:

Reviewer Action Date
Ballard, Kelly Approved 5/30/2023 2:17 PM
Packet Page 333 of 839

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-139

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEEDING, APPROVING THE FISCAL Y EAR 2023-2024 ENGINEER’S REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024, AND TAKING RELATED ACTIONS IN CONNECTION

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-1 (GATEWAY)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway)” (LLMD No. 2023-1 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-1 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the council ordered NBS Government Finance Group (Assessment Engineer) to prepare and, upon completion, file a written report with the city clerk for submission to the council in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution in connection with the proposed formation of the District; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

WHEREAS, the city clerk caused a notice of the public hearing, together with an assessment ballot on which the owner could indicate support of or opposition to the proposed annual assessments, and assessment ballot submission instructions, to be mailed to the record owner of each assessable parcel within the proposed District in the time, form and manner required by law; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 139

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the prop osed assessments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the assessment ballots were unsealed and tabulated in public view on June 7, 2023, at the City of Fairfield City Council Chamber, 1000 Webster Street, commencing at 9:00 a.m., and all interested persons were able to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. The council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to th e formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the council.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assess ed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 335 of 839Attachment 1 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 139

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 9. The County Auditor of Solano County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each assessable parcel in the District the amount of the assessment, and such assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the city treasurer or City Finance Department.

Section 10. The city treasurer, finance director, or their designee shall deposit all monies representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund for the District, and such money shall be expended only for the improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 336 of 839Attachment 1 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 139

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK

Packet Page 337 of 839Attachment 1 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-140

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEEDING, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 ENGINEER’S REPORT, AS MODIFIED, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024, AND TAKING RELATED

ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-3 (WATERMAN HIGHLANDS)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)” (LMD No. 2023-3 or District) and to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LMD No. 2023-3 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report ent itled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

WHEREAS, staff has prepared a modified Engineer’s Report (Modified Engineer’s Report), attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein, to update the “Waterman Boulevard feet of roadway with landscaping improvements” measurement on page 13 from 1,136 feet to 1,600 feet and to make a corresponding increase to the overall general benefit amount of 1.95% ($3,095) and a corresponding proportionate reduction in assessments; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 140

Page 2 ends

and assessment ballot submission instructions, to be mailed to the record owner of each assessable Parcel within the proposed District in the time, form and manner required by law; and

WHEREAS, the council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the formation of the District and the levy and collection of assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Modified Engineer’s Report. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard regarding protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. The council considered the Modified Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulation of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. The council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the assessable Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the council.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Modified Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements as described in the Modified Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Modified Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method Packet Page 339 of 839Attachment 2 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 140

Page 3 ends

which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable Parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such Parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution , and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 4. The council hereby finally approves the Modified Engineer’s Report attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements, as described in the Modified Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with law.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Modified Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year.

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 9. The County Auditor of Solano County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each assessable Parcel in the District the amount of the assessment, and such assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the city treasurer or City Finance Department.

Packet Page 340 of 839Attachment 2 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 140

Page 4 ends

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK

Packet Page 341 of 839Attachment 2 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-141

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)” (LLMD No. 2023-5 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-5 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 141

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assess ments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 343 of 839Attachment 3 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 141

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessme nt rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 344 of 839Attachment 3 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 141

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 345 of 839Attachment 3 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-142

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-6 (Peppertree)” (LMD No. 2023-6 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LMD No. 2023-6 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report ent itled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-6 (Peppertree)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 142

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 347 of 839Attachment 4 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 142

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual a ssessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 348 of 839Attachment 4 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 142

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 349 of 839Attachment 4 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-143

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-7 (ROLLING HILLS)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-7 (Rolling Hills)” (LLMD No. 2023-7 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-7 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-7 (Rolling Hills)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 143

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assess ments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 351 of 839Attachment 5 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 143

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessme nt rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the city are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 352 of 839Attachment 5 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 143

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 353 of 839Attachment 5 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-144

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-8 (KOLOB ESTATES)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-8 (Kolob Estates)” (LLMD No. 2023-8 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-8 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-8 (Kolob Estates)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 144

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. The council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the council.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the es timated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 355 of 839Attachment 6 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 144

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year.

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 356 of 839Attachment 6 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 144

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 357 of 839Attachment 6 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-145

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-11 (PARADISE VALLEY)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley)” (LLMD No. 2023- 11 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-11 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-11 (Paradise Valley)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 145

Page 2 ends

to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Packet Page 359 of 839Attachment 7 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 145

Page 3 ends

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual a ssessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Packet Page 360 of 839Attachment 7 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 145

Page 4 ends

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK

Packet Page 361 of 839Attachment 7 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-146

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEEDING, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 ENGINEER’S REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024, AND TAKING RELATED ACTIONS IN CONNECTION

WITH THE PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-12 (DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-12 (Downtown Business District)” (LLMD No. 2023-12 or District) and to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-12 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023- 2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023 -2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-12 (Downtown Business District)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

WHEREAS, the city clerk caused a notice of the public hearing, together with an assessment ballot on which the owner could indicate support of or opposition to the proposed annual assessments, and assessment ballot submission instructions, to be mailed to the record owner of each assessable Parcel within the proposed District in the time, form and manner required by law; and

Packet Page 362 of 839Attachment 8 Page 1 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 146

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2023, the council adopted Resolution No. 2023-127, approving a five-year assessment levy schedule for the District (Levy Schedule) to reduce the financial impact to property owners in the District for five years, commencing with FY 2023-2024.

WHEREAS, the council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the formation of the District and the levy and collection of assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard regarding protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons ; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulation of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 2. The council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the assessable Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the council.

RES. NO. 2023 - 146

Page 3 ends

amount among all assessable Parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 4. The council hereby finally approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements, as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with law.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year.

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024. In accordance with the Levy Schedule, the council hereby determines that the levy and general benefit contribution for FY 2023-2024 shall be 30% of the maximum assessment and general benefit contribution set forth in the Engineer’s Report for FY 2023-2024, with the expenditures for the improvements to correspond with the reduced revenues. The levies and general benefit contributions in each of FY 2024-2025 through FY 2027-2028 shall be in amounts that are not more than an additional 30% of the assessment levied or general benefit contribution, as applicable, in the prior fiscal year.

Packet Page 364 of 839Attachment 8 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 146

Page 4 ends

Section 9. The County Auditor of Solano County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each assessable Parcel in the District the amount of the assessment, and such assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due the County for collection, shall be paid to the city treasurer or City Finance Department.

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 365 of 839Attachment 8 Page 4 of 4

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-147

WITH PROPOSED CITY OF FAIRFIELD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2023-13 (NORTH CORDELIA)

WHEREAS, pursuant to prior resolutions adopted on April 18, 2023, the council initiated proceedings and declared its intention to form an assessment district, “City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-13 (North Cordelia)” (LLMD No. 2023- 13 or District), and to levy and collect assessments against the lots and parcels of property (Parcels) within LLMD No. 2023-13 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Assessment Act), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024 (FY 2023-2024), and set a public hearing for June 6, 2023, regarding the proposed formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessments within the District for FY 2023-2024; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed with the city clerk and the city clerk presented to the council such report entitled, “Engineer’s Report for: City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-13 (North Cordelia)” (Engineer’s Report) and after carefully examining and reviewing the Engineer’s Report, the council, by previous resolution adopted on April 18, 2023, preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report as filed; and

RES. NO. 2023 - 147

Page 2 ends

persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard regarding protests and objections to the formation of the District and the levy and collection of the proposed asse ssments. The council considered the Engineer’s Report, staff reports, and other information, and all oral and written statements, protests, and communications made or filed by interested persons; and

WHEREAS, the council designated the city clerk and/or the Assessment Engineer to tabulate the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared a certificate, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, which reflects the results of the tabulati on of the assessment ballots.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD HEREBY RESOLVES:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein.

Section 3. The council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the District will be specially benefitted by the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (ii) the District includes all of the Parcels so benefitted, (iii) the assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report, (iv) the net amount to be assessed upon the Parcels within the District for FY 2023-2024 in accordance with the Engineer’s Report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements, (v) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that Parcel, (vi) the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation, (vii) the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and (viii) the council has complied with all Packet Page 367 of 839Attachment 9 Page 2 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 147

Page 3 ends

laws pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the assessments, including the Assessment Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 4. The council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report, as filed, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.

Section 5. The council hereby orders the formation of the District.

Section 6. The council hereby orders the proposed improvements as described in the Engineer’s Report, to be made in accordance with the Assessment Act.

Section 7. The council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report, as filed, including the total maximum assessment for FY 2023-2024, the maximum assessment against each assessable Parcel for FY 2023-2024, and the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type, which rates shall be escalated each year on July 1, commencing on July 1, 2024, by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3%. In subsequent fiscal years, the assessments may be levied at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget for that year without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding pursuant to Proposition 218 provided that the actual a ssessment rate per special benefit point for each improvement type does not exceed the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point, as escalated, for that improvement type for that year .

Section 8. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments against the assessable Parcels in the District for FY 2023-2024.

Packet Page 368 of 839Attachment 9 Page 3 of 4

RES. NO. 2023 - 147

Page 4 ends

Section 11. The city clerk and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary or appropriate actions to implement this resolution.

Section 12. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and be open for public inspection.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: MEMBERS: MOY / BERTANI / CARR /PANDURO / TONNESEN/ VACCARO / WILLIAMS

NOES: MEMBERS:

ABSENT: MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:

___________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________

CITY CLERK
Packet Page 369 of 839Attachment 9 Page 4 of 4

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

The undersigned, the duly authorized tabulation official appointed by the City Council of the City of Fairfield, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following), I did tabulate the assessment ballots timely submitted in the assessment ballot proceedings pertaining to the City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway).

I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Assessment Ballots Received shows the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the proposed assessments and the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed assessments, each total weighted according to the financial obligation of the affected properties for which the assessment ballots were submitted.

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 370 of 839Attachment 10 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

The undersigned, the duly authorized tabulation official appointed by the City Council of the City of Fairfield, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following), I did tabulate the assessment ballots timely submitted in the assessment ballot proceedings pertaining to the City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands).

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 371 of 839Attachment 11 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 372 of 839Attachment 12 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 373 of 839Attachment 13 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 374 of 839Attachment 14 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 375 of 839Attachment 15 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 376 of 839Attachment 16 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 377 of 839Attachment 17 Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Certificate of Assessment Engineer
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Received

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SOLANO ) ss.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD )

Total assessment ballots distributed:

Total assessment ballots received:

Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessments:

Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed assessments:

This certification is executed this _____ day of __________, 2023 in ___________________, California.

By:

Title:

Packet Page 378 of 839Attachment 18 Page 1 of 1

nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516

Engineer’s Report For:

City of Fairfield Landscaping and
Lighting Maintenance District No.
2023-1 (Gateway)
March 2023

Packet Page 379 of 839Attachment 19 Page 1 of 30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 District History ........................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Legislative Context .................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Court Rulings ............................................................................................................. 2

2. IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................. 4

2.1 Street Lighting ........................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ......................................................................... 5

3. BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................ 6

3.1 Street Lighting ........................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ......................................................................... 7

4. SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................... 8

4.1 Parcel Characteristics ................................................................................................ 8

4.2 Land Use .................................................................................................................... 9

4.3 Total Special Benefit Points ..................................................................................... 12

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL BENEFITS ......................................... 14

5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................. 14

5.2 General Benefit Analysis ......................................................................................... 14

6. BUDGET ........................................................................................................................ 18

6.1 Maximum Amount to Be Assessed ......................................................................... 19

6.2 FY 23/24 Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point for Each Improvement Type ............................................................................................................ 19

6.3 Annual Maximum Assessment Rate Inflation for Each Improvement Type (Street Lighting and Landscaping) ................................................................................................. 19

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics ................................................................ 20

6.5 Data for Annual Assessment Calculations ............................................................... 20

6.6 Appeals .................................................................................................................... 20

6.7 Method of Collection .............................................................................................. 21

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT .............................................................................................. 22

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ................................................................................................ 23

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL ........................................................................................................ 24

10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 25 Packet Page 380 of 839Attachment 19 Page 2 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 District History
The City of Fairfield (“City”) desires to fund certain landscaping and lighting services and improvements as described in Section 2 of this Report through an annual assessment. The proposed assessment is subject to the substantive and procedural requirements described in Section 4, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Article XIII D”). The assessment is authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq.) (the “Act”).

The City currently has an existing assessment district which funds various services and improvements including lighting, landscaping, and the associated maintenance, operation, and servicing within the boundary of Maintenance District No. 1 – Gateway. As the existing assessment district does not provide sufficient revenue for the services and improvements, the City proposes to form a new assessment district that is intended to provide sufficient revenue to fund ongoing annual associated maintenance, operation, and servicing of the landscaping and lighting improvements; reserve funds for replacement and repair of the improvements; and an allowance for an annual inflator so the assessment rate may be increased over time as costs increase without conducting a new Article XIII D balloting proceeding. The proposed assessment district is the City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) (“District”).

1.2 Legislative Context
In 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218, known as the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. Article XIII D established new substantive and procedural requirements on agencies for levying assessments, being levies on real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. “Special benefit” is defined in Article XIII D as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on a real property located in the district or to the public at large.”

Article XIII D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:

(1) All parcels that will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed must be identified;
(2) The general benefits must be distinguished from the special benefits conferred on the parcels;
(3) The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel must be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided;
(4) The amount assessed to a parcel must not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and must not include any costs attributable to the general benefit; and
Packet Page 381 of 839Attachment 19 Page 3 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 2 (5) Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

Article XIII D also places procedural requirements on assessments, which include preparing an engineer’s report, providing written notice of the proposed assessment and a public hearing to property owners, holding a public hearing, and providing for a protest ballot proceeding.

1.3 Court Rulings
Since the initial passage of Proposition 218, several court rulings have helped provide context and direction with respect to the procedures and requirements of Article XIII D for levying assessments. Several of the key concepts from these rulings are summarized below.

1.3.1 GENERAL BENEFIT
Article XIII D requires an agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on the identified parcels because only special benefits are assessable.

The Court of Appeal in Golden Hills Neighborhood Assn., Inc. v. City of San Diego (2011) (“Golden Hills”) clarified this concept by stating, “Separation and quantification of general and special benefits must be accomplished by apportioning the cost of a service or improvement between the two and assessing property owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits.” The Court of Appeal in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010) (“Beutz”) noted that the trial court took judicial notice of the Legislative Analyst’s Office pamphlet titled “Understanding Proposition 218” which states an agency must, “estimate the amount of special benefit landowners would receive from the project or service, as well as the amount of ‘general benefit.’ This step is needed because Proposition 218 allows local government to recoup from assessments only the proportionate share of cost to provide the special benefit.”
The Court in Beutz furthered this idea stating, “Separating the general from the special benefits of a public improvement project and estimating the quantity of each in relation to the other is essential if an assessment is to be limited to the special benefits.”
The Court of Appeal again reiterated the need to separate, quantify and apportion costs to general benefits from the improvements in Broad Beach Geologic Hazard Abatement District v 31506 Victoria Point LLC (2022), stating, “The District cites no authority, and we are aware of none, suggesting that an agency’s subjective intent determines the need to account for general benefits.”

1.3.2 BENEFIT-BASED NOT COST-BASED
In Town of Tiburon v. Bonander (2009) (“Tiburon”), the Court of Appeal clarified the idea that assessments must be apportioned based upon benefit rather than cost. The Court stated, “Proportionate special benefit is the basis upon which a project’s total assessable costs are apportioned among parcels within an assessment district.”
Packet Page 382 of 839Attachment 19 Page 4 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 3 The assessment on a particular property cannot be based on the relative cost of the improvements to the property, but rather on the special benefit conferred on such property. The Court in Tiburon also stated, “an assessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvement or property-related service, less any amount attributable to general benefits (which may not be assessed), allocated to individual properties in proportion to the relative special benefit conferred on the property.”

1.3.3 MEASURING AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL BENEFIT
The Court in Tiburon acknowledged the difficulty of trying to precisely assign and measure special benefit, stating, “Any attempt to classify special benefits conferred on particular properties and to assign relative weights to those benefits will necessarily involve some degree of imprecision.” The Court in Tiburon went on to say that a formula assigning equal weight to different special benefits “may be a legally justifiable approach to measuring and apportioning special benefits, [but] it is not necessarily the only valid approach. Whichever approach is taken to measuring and apportioning special benefits, however, it must be both defensible and consistently applied.”

Packet Page 383 of 839Attachment 19 Page 5 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 4

2. IMPROVEMENTS
The assessments will fund the following maintenance, operation, and servicing activities:
 Street Lighting
 Street Trees and Other Landscaping
The maintenance, operation, and servicing activities listed above are collectively referred to as the “Improvements.” A general illustration of the location of the landscaping and lighting improvements is shown below and the Assessment Diagram can be found in Section 8.

For illustration purposes only, not an official map.

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 5 platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. Maintenance, operation, and servicing includes, but is not limited to, personnel, furnishing utilities, electrical energy and timing/switching, lamp changing, emergency services, pole painting, fixture cleaning, glassware replacement, and rehabilitation, which includes modernization and replacement of systems; repairs, including poles, conduit, wiring and fusing, and fixtures repair and replacement, contracting services and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. Currently, there are 70 total street lights within the District and the general location of the Improvements within the District is shown in the illustration above.

2.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping
The Improvements include the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street trees and landscaping throughout the boundary of the District, as identified in the above illustrative map. The Improvements are generally described as: the maintenance, operation, and servicing of trees, landscape and appurtenant facilities in the public right of way areas, as well as open space, trails and green belt areas dispersed throughout the District. Eligible District costs may include, but are not limited to, personnel, furnishing electrical energy, utilities such as water and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows:

The improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced include, but are not limited to: groundcover, turf, trees, shrubs, planters, the landscaped areas and weed abatement of open spaces, and may also include sidewalk and hardscape Improvements, entry monuments and associated appurtenant facilities.

There is approximately 365,228 square feet of landscape maintenance area and 651 street trees within the District. The general location of the Improvements within the District is described as follows:

1. Landscaping improvements on median islands and on both sides of Gateway Boulevard, Gateway Court, Maupin Lane, B. Gale Wilson Boulevard, B. Gale Wilson Drive, and Oxford Drive from the curb to the parking lot.

2. Landscaping improvements at various parking lot entryways.

3. Landscaping improvements along the perimeter of district boundaries except for the landscaping improvements located along the southern and eastern district boundaries beginning approximately 150 feet east of the Travis Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard intersection to approximately 150 feet south of the Pennsylvania Avenue and Gateway Boulevard intersection.

Packet Page 385 of 839Attachment 19 Page 7 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 6

3. BENEFITS
The Improvements will confer special benefits upon certain parcels within the District. These benefits are summarized in the table below:

Improvement Benefit(s)
Street Lighting Improved Safety
Improved Accessibility
Street Trees and Other Landscaping Improved Aesthetics
Increased Economic Activity
The special benefits to be conferred by the Improvements are detailed below.

3.1 Street Lighting

3.1.1 IMPROVED SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY
The street lighting Improvements will confer safety benefits to assessable parcels in close proximity to lighting. This benefit extends to property, as adequate lighting should decrease vandalism and other property-related crime. As noted in one report, “Published studies having different methodologies tend to converge on an overall average reported 20% to 30% reduction in nighttime crash risk from lighting” (National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, 2009). The same report also states, “… lighting has a positive effect on reducing crime ...” The Improvements will also provide improved safety benefits by facilitating a more efficient and safer flow of traffic to and from properties within the District between the dusk and dawn hours. It is a well-accepted fact that pedestrian and traffic safety is considerably reduced in the hours of darkness between dusk and dawn. Various studies have concluded that good quality street lighting reduces the accident rate by increasing the overall visibility, as vehicle headlights are inadequate for high-speed traffic. For example, “Driving outside of daylight hours is more dangerous – only a quarter of all travel by car drivers is between the hours of 7pm and 8am, yet this period accounts for 40% of fatal and serious injuries in the same group.” (Night-time accidents: a scoping study, UCL, London, 2009). Additionally, “… installing road lighting in a previously unlit road led to a rate ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.69), which implies a 55% reduction in crashes compared to that in the control area.” (Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009) Therefore, the street lighting Improvements will confer safety benefits to property within the District and each assessable property will be assessed for its proportional special benefit.

The street lighting Improvements will also provide improved accessibility benefits to assessable parcels where street lighting is provided along the access route. The usefulness of a parcel cannot be realized unless it is accessible. Thus, improving the accessibility of a parcel through proper street lighting can improve its utilization. The street lighting Improvements will help improve access for emergency response vehicles as well. The efficient and timely response to emergencies is a critical component to the effectiveness of emergency response. It is reasonable to conclude that the maintenance, operation and servicing of street Packet Page 386 of 839Attachment 19 Page 8 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 7 lighting will improve emergency response efficiency in the District. Therefore, the street lighting Improvements will confer accessibility benefits.

3.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping

3.2.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS AND INCREASED ECONOMIC ACTIVITY The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, operation, and servicing of the street trees and other landscaping within the District.

Specifically, the street trees and other landscaping are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within the District and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District. A study by the University of Georgia found "People’s preferences for locating areas of social interactions in calming, beautiful, and nature-dominated areas revolve around the presence of community trees and forests" (Coder, 1996). The same study noted “Large old street trees were found to be the most important indicator of attractiveness in a community” (Coder).

Conversely, "appeal decreases when Improvements are not well-maintained, unsafe, or destroyed by vandalism” (The Victoria Transportation Institute, 2011). Streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents and visitors to the community. Therefore, the street trees and other landscaping Improvements will confer aesthetic benefits to properties in close proximity.

The street trees and other landscaping improvements that confer aesthetic benefits will concurrently confer economic activity benefits as well. The Improvements will create a well-maintained and clean environment that is aesthetically pleasing, which has been shown to “increase consumer’s intentions to spend money” (Vilnai-Yavetz 2010). Additionally, "in contrast to areas without trees, shoppers indicated that they shop more often and longer in well-landscaped business districts, and were willing to pay more for goods and services” according to the Pennsylvania Landscape & Nursey Association. Therefore, the Improvements will also confer economic activity benefits to properties in close proximity.

Packet Page 387 of 839Attachment 19 Page 9 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 8

4. SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION
Once special benefits are identified, they must be assigned based on the estimated proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel. This section describes the assignment of special benefit to each parcel.

4.1 Parcel Characteristics
The following parcel characteristics are used to determine each parcel’s proportionate special benefit:
 Building Square Footage
 Lot Square Footage
 Average Daily Trip Generation
Differing levels of special benefit can largely be attributed to differences in building size, lot size, and trip generation associated with land use. As building size, lot size and average daily trip generation increase, parcels are considered to receive proportionately greater special benefit. For example, assuming all other factors are equal, a parcel with a large building will experience greater special benefit than a parcel with a small building. Therefore, these three parcel characteristics are deemed appropriate factors for determining proportional special benefit.

In order to relate differing parcel characteristics to one another, a relative factor is determined for each of the three parcel characteristics. The calculation methodology for the building factor, lot factor and average daily trip factor are described below.

4.1.1 BUILDING FACTOR
The average building size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 44,043.55 square feet. Each assessable parcel’s actual building size was divided by the District’s average building size to determine a Building Factor.

Parcel's Building
Square Feet / District's Average
Building Square Feet = Parcel's
Building Factor

4.1.2 LOT FACTOR
The average lot size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 130,457.77 square feet.

Each assessable parcel’s actual lot square footage was divided by the District’s average lot square footage to determine a Lot Factor.

Parcel's Lot
Square Feet / District's Average
Lot Square Feet = Parcel's
Lot Factor

4.1.3 ADT FACTOR
The average daily trip (ADT) count for all assessable parcels within the District is 1,644.52 trips. Each assessable parcel’s ADT was divided by the District’s ADT to determine the parcel’s ADT factor.

Parcel's
Trips / District's Average Trips =Parcel's
ADT Factor
Packet Page 388 of 839Attachment 19 Page 10 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 9 Assessable parcels were assigned trip generation rates by land use classification in accordance with the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). Per the ITE Trip Generation User’s Guide, a “Trip” is defined as a “single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination (exiting and entering) inside a study site. For trip generation purposes, the total number of trips for a land use over a given period of time are the total of all trips entering plus all trips exiting a site during a designated time period.”
The ADT rates used in this analysis are shown in the table below. ADT rates came from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), unless otherwise noted. For land uses with multiple ITE Codes, an average trip value was used for the ADT rate. Only those land use classifications currently being assessed at the time of preparation of this report are included below. Any future changes to a parcel’s land use classification resulting in changes to the parcel’s ADT rates will be based on the values found in the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

Land Use Classification
Institute of Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE) Value(s)
Average Daily
Trip (ADT) Rate
ADT
Rate Per
Commercial 310 – Hotel 7.99 Room
Commercial 435 – Multi-Purpose
Recreational Facility 3.58 1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Commercial 630 – Clinic 37.6 1,000 sq. ft. GFA
Commercial 820 – Shopping Center 37.01 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Commercial 945 – Convenience
Store/Gas Station 265.12 Vehicle Fueling
Stations

4.2 Land Use
In addition to building size, lot size and average daily trip generation a parcel’s land use will also affect the special benefits received. Following the calculation of each parcel’s characteristic factors in Section 4.1 above, Land Use Benefit Points were assigned. These benefit points correspond to the special benefits described in the Benefits section of this report.

Each parcel within the proposed District boundary is assigned a land use classification for purposes of determining the special benefits received. Below is a description of the land use classifications to be assessed within the District. Not all land use classifications below are currently within the District.

Commercial Property consists of parcels used for commercial, for-profit or non-profit purposes including, but not limited to, retail, offices, restaurants, commercial garages, private schools, hotels/motels, medical/dental offices, and privately-owned pay-to-use parking lots and structures.

Multi-Family Residential Property consists of parcels that are duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and condominiums used exclusively for residential purposes.

Park Property consists of certain park parcels that are not being maintained by the District or included as part of the District Improvements.

Public Property consists of parcels used for public purposes including, golf courses, police and fire stations, public schools, libraries, and other government administration buildings.

Packet Page 389 of 839Attachment 19 Page 11 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 10 Single Family Residential Property consists of parcels that have stand-alone residential dwelling units with their own lots intended for one family.

Undeveloped Property consists of parcels with no structure value.

There are currently a total of 43 assessable parcels within the District.

4.2.1 APPORTIONING SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY BENEFIT
The Safety and Accessibility Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. Safety can be thought of as a universal need. Its importance can be seen in the fact that everyone desires to live and work in safe, crime-free areas (Lau Leby 2010). Therefore, because levels of safety affect all land uses, it follows that an increase in safety will specially benefit all land use classifications. Additionally, as noted in Section 3.1, the usefulness of a parcel cannot be realized unless it is accessible. As the street lighting Improvements allow for increased visibility around assessed parcels and easier access to properties throughout the District, these benefits are also not restricted to a particular land use.

However, due to their limited activity during the dusk to dawn hours, Park, Public and Undeveloped land use classifications will not experience the same level of safety and accessibility benefits compared to other land use classifications. For example, Park, Public and Undeveloped land use classifications experience limited activities during the evening hours when the greatest safety benefit from street lighting is received.

However, it is recognized that a visible and well-lit property, especially during the nighttime hours, will aid in deterring dumping and other illegal activities, such as property-related crime and will allow for access in case of an emergency. To account for this limited special benefit, Park and Public land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 0.50 and Undeveloped land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of

0.25 for Safety and Accessibility. All other land use classifications will be assigned 1 Safety and Accessibility Benefit Point.

Additionally, all land use classifications located in proximity to interior street lighting will experience a greater level of safety and accessibility benefits compared to other land use classifications due to the benefit of the parcel being located adjacent to interior street lighting. To account for this added benefit, parcels designated with the Interior Lighting land use classification are assigned double the benefit points for Safety and Accessibility, for example Public (Interior Lighting) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 1 and Undeveloped (Interior Lighting) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of

0.50 for Safety and Accessibility. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

After the land use benefit points have been assigned by land use classifications within the District, improved safety and accessibility from street lighting, as property-related benefits, can be measured by the characteristics of a parcel, namely the size of a building, its lot size, and daily trip generation. Parcels with larger building and lot sizes and parcels with greater intensity of use, measured by trip generation, will experience the Safety and Accessibility Benefits to a greater degree than smaller, less-utilized parcels.

Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT factor are used to measure Safety and Accessibility Benefits. The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

Packet Page 390 of 839Attachment 19 Page 12 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 11

4.2.2 APPORTIONING AESTHETIC BENEFIT
The Aesthetic Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. The benefit of visual appeal is not restricted to a particular land use. A more attractive public environment specially benefits all parcels irrespective of land use. Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Aesthetic Benefit Point. However, Undeveloped land use classifications will be assigned 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Point due to the nature of the land use. Per the definition in Section 3.2.1, “the street trees and other landscaping are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within the District and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District.” As such, there is some aesthetic benefit conferred by the Improvements on undeveloped land use classifications. However, this benefit is limited, as undeveloped parcels are not utilized as areas recognized in the definition of aesthetic benefit of social interactions, areas where residents are likely to walk, areas of stimulated economic activity or locations that will attract residents and/or visitors to the community. Therefore, the undeveloped land use classifications are assigned the reduced 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Points due to the nature of the land use compared to the developed land use classifications. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

After the land use benefit points have been assigned by land use classifications within the District, improved aesthetics from tree and landscaping Improvements, as property-related benefits, can be measured by the characteristics of a parcel, namely the size of a building, its lot size, and daily trip generation. Parcels with larger building and lot sizes and parcels with greater intensity of use, measured by trip generation, will experience the Aesthetic Benefits to a greater degree than smaller, less-developed parcels. Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT Factor are used to measure Aesthetic Benefits.

The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.3 APPORTIONING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY BENEFIT
The Economic Activity Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. Street trees and landscaping add value in many ways. They increase the social value of the City by making places more pleasing to people on foot and in cars and they also add great environmental benefits, which fuel economic benefits. The research has demonstrated that consumers will shop more often and for longer durations in well-landscaped business districts. The research also indicates that shoppers are willing to pay more money for goods and services in well-landscaped business districts.

Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Economic Activity Benefit Point.

The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

After the land use benefit points have been assigned by land use classifications within the District, improved economic activity from tree and landscaping Improvements, as a property related benefit, can be measured by the characteristics of a parcel, namely the size of a building, its size, and trip generation.

Parcels with larger building and lot sizes and parcels with greater intensity of use, measured by trip generation, will experience the Economic Activity Benefits to a greater degree than smaller, less-developed parcels. Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT Factor are used to measure Economic Activity Benefits. The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

Packet Page 391 of 839Attachment 19 Page 13 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 12

4.2.4 LAND USE BENEFIT POINTS
The tables below summarize the Land Use Benefit Points assigned to the various assessable land use classifications within the District:

Street Lighting
Land Use Classification Per Safety Accessibility
Total Street
Lighting Land Use
Benefit Points
Single Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Single Family Residential (Interior Lighting) Parcel 2 2 4 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Multi-Family Residential (Interior Lighting) Parcel 2 2 4 Commercial Parcel 1 1 2
Commercial (Interior Lighting) Parcel 2 2 4
Park Parcel 0.50 0.50 1
Park (Interior Lighting) Parcel 1.00 1.00 2
Public Parcel 0.50 0.50 1
Public (Interior Lighting) Parcel 1 1 2
Undeveloped Parcel 0.25 0.25 0.50
Undeveloped (Interior Lighting) Parcel 0.50 0.50 1

Street Trees and Other Landscaping

Land Use Classification Per Aesthetic Economic Activity Total Landscaping
Land Use Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Commercial Parcel 1 1 2
Park Parcel 1 1 2
Public Parcel 1 1 2
Undeveloped Parcel 0.25 0.25 0.50

4.3 Total Special Benefit Points
The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel takes into account each component analyzed and described above, parcel characteristics and land use classification. The formula for determining each parcel’s Total Benefit Points is as follows:
( Building
Factor + Lot
Factor + ADT
Factor ) x
Street Lighting
Land Use Benefit
Points
=
Total Street
Lighting Special
Benefit Points
( Building
Factor + Lot
Factor + ADT
Factor ) x
Landscaping Land
Use Benefit
Points
=
Total
Landscaping
Special
Benefit Points
Packet Page 392 of 839Attachment 19 Page 14 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 13

The Total Special Benefit Points by Improvement type are computed for each parcel in the District and summed. The Total District Special Benefit Points are 472.00. These Total District Special Benefit Points are used to determine the proposed assessment amounts on each parcel.

Packet Page 393 of 839Attachment 19 Page 15 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 14

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL

BENEFITS
As described in the Introduction, only special benefits are assessable and in order to assess only special benefits, the general benefits resulting from the Improvements must be separated and quantified. This section describes the process used to separate and quantify the general benefits.

5.1 Summary
As detailed below, it is estimated the Improvements will confer an Overall General Benefit of 37.34%.

5.2 General Benefit Analysis

5.2.1 GENERAL BENEFIT: VEHICLES PASSING THROUGH THE DISTRICT Traffic volume is utilized to help determine special benefits accruing to the District as opposed to the general benefits received by the public at large from the Improvements. As a result of the Improvements, there will be a level of general benefit conferred to pass-through vehicle traffic related to properties outside of the District whose occupants do not intend to access property within the District. As such, the benefit derived by pass-through vehicle traffic needs to be quantified. The percentage of pass-through vehicle traffic is calculated by comparing the estimated daily District generated vehicle trips to the total roadway design capacity, as detailed below.

In order to determine the average daily trips generated by parcels located within the District, the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was utilized to estimate the average daily trip counts by land use classification for each parcel. Per the ITE Trip Generation User’s Guide, a “Trip” is defined as a “single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination (exiting and entering) inside a study site. For trip generation purposes, the total trips for a land use over a given period of time are the total of all trips entering plus all trips exiting a site during a designated time period.” The ADT rates used in this analysis are shown in the table below and came from ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). Any future changes to land use classifications resulting in changes to a parcel’s ADT rates will be based on the values found in the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

Land Use
Classification
Institute of Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE) Value(s)
Average
Daily Trip
Rate Rate Per
Total
Parcels/
Units
Estimated
Daily District
Vehicle Trips
Commercial 310 – Hotel 7.99 Room 1 1,198.50
Commercial 435 – Multi-Purpose
Recreational Facility 3.58 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 1 119.06
Commercial 630 – Clinic 37.6 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 1 2,028.90 Commercial 820 – Shopping Center 37.01 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 39 55,114.70 Commercial 945 – Convenience
Store/Gas Station 265.12 Vehicle Fueling
Stations 1 2,386.08
Total: 60,847.24

Packet Page 394 of 839Attachment 19 Page 16 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 15 Roadway design capacity is a critical element that affects trip distribution and was utilized in this analysis to estimate the number of daily vehicle trips passing through the District. From a visual inspection of the District, the primary higher functional classification roadways serving the District parcels are Travis Boulevard, Gateway Boulevard, and Pennsylvania Avenue. Roadway design capacities, as defined in the City of Fairfield’s Travel Demand Forecasting Model, were estimated based on the functional classification of the roadway, the number of lanes, and the City’s minimum recommended Level of Service “C” (City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook 2020). Roadway design capacity was calculated for the higher functional classification roadways (henceforth referred to as the “Major Roads”) identified above in order to estimate the total daily traffic flow through the District.

Using the methodology described above, the estimated pass-through vehicular traffic through the District is 67.50% as summarized in the table below:

Average Vehicle
Trips Through
District
Estimated District
Generated Vehicle
Trips
Estimated Pass
Through Vehicle
Traffic
Pass Through
%
187,200 (1) - 60,847.24 = 126,352.76 67.50%
(1) Equals the design capacity of each roadway, reduced by 25% to recognize the City’s recommended “C” Level of Service. Breakdown by street name below.

The table below separates the weighted vehicular pass-through percentage factors by street name for the Major Roads traversing the District.

Street Name
Vehicle Trips
Passing-Through
District
% of Total
Roadway Design
Capacity (1)
Weighted Vehicle
Pass-Through %
Factor (2)
Travis Boulevard 86,400 46.15% 31.15%
Gateway Boulevard 50,400 26.92% 18.17%
Pennsylvania Avenue 50,400 26.92% 18.17%
Total: 187,200 100% 67.50%
(1) Equals (Vehicle Trips Passing Through District on Roadway / Total Vehicle Trips Passing Through District). (2) Equals (% of Total Roadway Design Capacity x Pass Through %).

However, simply estimating the number of pass-through vehicle does not necessarily indicate the level of benefit accruing to vehicles passing through the District. We must look at each of the Improvements individually.

5.2.2 GENERAL BENEFIT: STREET LIGHTING
Certain street lights to be funded by the assessment are on the Major Roads identified in Section 5.2.1.

Accordingly, some of the safety and access benefits will be conferred to vehicles that are just passing through the District. An analysis of the street lights was prepared comparing the number of street lights located on the Major Roads to the total number of street lights within the District.

The street lighting Improvements are located along Gateway Boulevard, Pennsylvania Avenue, and throughout many of the other streets within the District. There are no street lights located along Interstate 80, therefore there is no general or special benefit conferred by the street lighting Improvements along Interstate 80. The trips generated by the property within the District was taken as a percent of the total traffic on the Major Roads.

Packet Page 395 of 839Attachment 19 Page 17 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 16 Although interior streets are intended to serve the interior parcels, one could imagine a small degree of “tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the views, the natural surroundings or perhaps lost on their way to their intended destination. As such, approximately 2% is attributable to vehicles passing through on interior streets.

As summarized in the table below, the Effective General Benefit percentage from the Street Lighting Improvements is 15.86%.

Roadways with Street
Lights
Number of
Street Lights
% of
Streetlights
Weighted Vehicle Pass-
Through % Factor
Effective General
Benefit % (1)
Gateway Boulevard 59 84.29% 18.17% 15.32%
Pennsylvania Avenue 1 1.43% 18.17% 0.26%
Interior Lights 10 14.29% 2.00% 0.29%
Total: 70 15.86 (2)
(1) Equals (% of Streetlights x Pass-Through Percentage). (2) Does not add due to rounding.

5.2.3 GENERAL BENEFIT: STREET TREES AND OTHER LANDSCAPING Certain street trees and other landscaping to be funded by the assessment are on the Major Roads as described previously. Accordingly, some of the aesthetic and economic activity benefits will be conferred to traffic passing through the District. An analysis of the street trees and landscaping areas within the District was conducted and whenever street trees and landscaping areas were located within close proximity to the Major Roads, those trees were considered as belonging to the Major Roads.

The landscaping Improvements are located along Travis Boulevard, Gateway Boulevard, Pennsylvania Avenue, and throughout the District. In order to quantify the General Benefits conferred by the landscaping Improvements, the total linear length of the Improvements were utilized. Interstate 80 does not provide direct access to the District, however drivers traveling eastbound on Interstate 80 receive benefits from the landscaping Improvements, therefore 100% of the linear length bordering the Improvements is recognized as pass-through traffic for the General Benefit analysis.

As mentioned above, although interior streets are intended to serve individual neighborhoods, one could imagine a small degree of “tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the views and the natural surroundings, or perhaps lost on their way to their intended destination. As such, approximately 2% is attributable to vehicles passing through on interior streets.

As summarized in the table below, the Effective General Benefit percentage from the Landscaping Improvements is 21.48%.

Roadways with Landscaping
Improvements
Feet of Roadway
with
Landscaping
Improvements
% of Total
Landscaping
Improvements (1)
Weighted
Vehicle Pass-
Through %
Factor
Effective
General
Benefit % (2)
Travis Boulevard 2,908 12.59% 31.15% 3.92%
Gateway Boulevard 3,688 15.97% 18.17% 2.90%
Pennsylvania Avenue 2,447 10.59% 18.17% 1.93%
Interstate 80 2,713 11.74% 100% 11.74%
Interior Streets 11,341 49.10% 2.00% 0.98%
Total: 23,097 21.48%
Packet Page 396 of 839Attachment 19 Page 18 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 17 (1) Equals (Feet of Roadway with Landscaping Improvements / 23,097). (2) Equals (% of Total Landscaping Improvements x Weighted Vehicle Pass-Through % Factor).

5.2.4 OVERALL GENERAL BENEFIT
In order to determine an overall general benefit percentage to apply to the District, it is necessary to combine the separately analyzed components of each of the general benefits described above. As the benefits conferred by the Street Lights Improvements and by Street Trees and Other Landscaping Improvements are independent of each other, it is appropriate to combine the individual general benefit percentages to determine a cumulative Overall General Benefit. The table below is a summary of the Overall General Benefit for the District.

General Benefit Category
General
Benefit %
Street Lights 15.86%
Street Trees and Other Landscaping 21.48%
Overall General Benefit: 37.34%

Packet Page 397 of 839Attachment 19 Page 19 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 18

6. BUDGET
The following table summarizes the estimated annual costs to fund the Improvements for Fiscal Year 2023/24:

Description Amount
Landscaping and Street Trees
Landscape Maintenance $164,353
Tree Maintenance 37,975
Irrigation 126,500
Irrigation Parts and Repairs 18,261
Contingency (5%) 16,300
Reserves (5%) 16,300
Subtotal Landscaping: $379,689
Street Lighting
Street Light Maintenance 1,750
Electricity 8,400
Contingency (5%) 477
Reserves (5%) 477
Subtotal Street Lighting: $11,104
Administration
City Staff Costs $18,506
County Fees 4,173
Engineer/Consultant Costs 8,000
Subtotal Administration 30,679

Total Cost of Improvements $421,472

The following table breaks down the estimated annual costs from above for Fiscal Year 2023/24 by Improvement type. The Landscaping and Lighting Budget, the % of Budget and the General Benefit Percentages by Improvement type utilized in the Table below have been rounded. The final assessment rates listed in Section 9 have been truncated to two decimal places.

Description
Landscaping &
Lighting Budget
% of
Budget
Special
Benefit
Admin
Budget (3) Total
Special
Benefit
Points (SBP)
Rate per
SBP
Lighting Budget $11,103 2.84% $9,342 (1) $871 $10,213 236 $43.2768 Landscaping Budget 379,690 97.16% 298,171 (2) 29,807 327,978 236 1,389.7368 Total $390,793 $307,513 $30,679 (4) $338,191 472
(1) Equals (Lighting Budget x (1 – 15.86%)).
(2) Equals (Landscaping Budget x (1 – 21.48%)).
(3) Includes $4,173 for County fees, $8,000 for Engineering/Consultant costs and $18,506 for City staff costs. Equals (Total Admin Budget x % of Budget).
(4) Does not add due to rounding.

Packet Page 398 of 839Attachment 19 Page 20 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 19

6.1 Maximum Amount to Be Assessed
The total maximum amount to be assessed upon the assessable parcels is the total cost of the Improvements, as detailed above, less the portion of costs attributable to General Benefit as detailed in the Separation and Quantification of General Benefits section.

The calculation of the balance to be assessed is shown below:

Description Amount
Total Cost of Improvements $421,472
Less General Benefit Portion (Lighting – 15.86%) (1,761) Less General Benefit Portion (Landscaping – 21.48%) (81,519) Total Cost of Improvements to Be Assessed $338,191 (1)
(1) The Total Cost of Improvements to be Assessed does not add due to rounding. The final assessment rates in Section 9 have been truncated to two decimal places.

6.2 FY 23/24 Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point for Each Improvement Type
The Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point is calculated by dividing the total costs to be Assessed by the total Special Benefit Points assigned to the parcels within the District for each Improvement Type. The following formula provides the assessment rate per Special Benefit Point for each Improvement type.

Total Street Lighting Costs to be Assessed / Total Street Lighting Special Benefit Points = ($10,213.34) (236.00)

Assessment Rate per Street Lighting Special Benefit Point ($43.7268)
Total Landscaping Costs to be Assessed / Total Landscaping Special Benefit Points = ($327,977.88) (236.00)

Assessment Rate per Landscaping Special Benefit Point
($1,389.7368)
The Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point for each Improvement Type is then multiplied by each parcel’s total special benefit points to determine the maximum assessment amount per parcel.

6.3 Annual Maximum Assessment Rate Inflation for Each Improvement Type (Street Lighting and Landscaping)
Each parcel’s maximum assessment for an Improvement type is determined by multiplying the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point by the parcel’s total special benefit points. If the total special benefit points for all assessable parcels in the District change in future years, the maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point will not be recalculated. The maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point, plus the annual cost of living inflator, will remain fixed. The actual annual assessment rate per special benefit point will be calculated by dividing the fiscal year’s total Packet Page 399 of 839Attachment 19 Page 21 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 20 cost of improvements to be assessed by the total special benefit points, not to exceed the maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point for that fiscal year. The maximum allowable assessment rate per special benefit point is escalated each year on July 1 by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually, beginning July 1, 2024.

In any given year, the assessments may be at any rate sufficient to meet the estimated budget and levied without undertaking an assessment ballot proceeding, as long as the actual assessment rate per special benefit point does not exceed the Maximum Assessment Rate per special benefit point for that fiscal year.

If the change in CPI effective for any fiscal year is determined to be negative, the maximum assessment rate will remain unchanged from the previous fiscal year. The actual assessment rate may vary from year to year but will be no higher than the maximum rate.

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics
Future changes to any of the parcel characteristics detailed in Section 4 will cause possible changes in the total assessment revenue. The assessment revenue for any given year will be the product of the District’s parcel characteristics, special benefit points and the budget in effect for such fiscal year. Development within the District that increases the overall building square footage, for example, will lead to possible increased assessment revenue, even if the assessment rate per special benefit point is not increased. By way of example, when a previously undeveloped parcel develops into a commercial land use classification, the parcel will no longer be assessed as an undeveloped land use, but rather as a commercial parcel with the updated parcel characteristics.

6.5 Data for Annual Assessment Calculations
Each year, as part of the assessment calculation procedures, the City or its designated consultant shall determine the land use classification for each parcel based on the County Assessor's use code or other supplementary information made available and deemed reliable. The parcel characteristics of building square footage and lot square footage shall similarly be based on the County Assessor's secured roll data for the applicable tax year and may be supplemented with other reliable data sources, such as County Assessor's parcel maps and GIS data.

Assessment amounts for each parcel may change over time in accordance with changes to parcel characteristics including land use classification, building square footage, lot square footage and average daily trip generation.

6.6 Appeals
If any property owner believes the data used to calculate the assessment is inaccurate for any reason, the property owner shall submit, in writing, a request for review to the City. The property owner shall provide documentation to support the request for review. The City or its designated consultant shall review the request and provide a response to the property owner. The property owner must be current in the payment of all assessments when filing the request for review and must remain current during the review process.

Packet Page 400 of 839Attachment 19 Page 22 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 21 If the review conducted by the City or its designated consultant results in the approval for changes to any parcel characteristics used to compute the assessment, the City or its designated consultant shall recalculate the assessment. When recalculating the assessment, the assessment rates actually applied in such fiscal year shall be used. Only the assessment for the parcel or parcels subject to review shall be recalculated.

If the recalculated assessment for the parcel or parcels being reviewed is less than the amount submitted to the County on the secured property tax roll, the difference shall be credited back to the property owner in a manner approved by the City. This credit shall be limited to the current fiscal year and the prior fiscal year, if applicable. The “fiscal year” shall follow the County’s fiscal year for property taxes, from July 1 to June 30. The applicable fiscal year shall be determined by the date the request for review is submitted to the City.

The credit may be provided in the form of a check issued to the property owner, an adjustment to the current year’s property tax roll (if possible), or a credit to the succeeding year’s assessment thereby reducing the amount placed on the secured property tax roll for such year.

If the recalculated assessment is greater than the amount submitted to the County on the secured property tax roll, the City or its designated consultant shall apply the recalculated assessment to the succeeding year’s property tax roll and no adjustments shall be made to the prior or current fiscal years’ assessments.

In any dispute over parcel characteristic data used to compute assessments, the City Manager (or his/her designee) shall make a conclusive determination and its decision shall be final.

6.7 Method of Collection
The assessments will be collected annually on the Solano County secured property tax roll. The assessments will be subject to the County’s assigned due dates and late penalties. However, the City Manager (or his/her designee) may choose to collect the assessments in an alternate manner (including directly billing the property owner) as may be deemed appropriate or necessary by the City or as allowed by law.

Packet Page 401 of 839Attachment 19 Page 23 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 22

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT
The City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) assessments described in this Report have been prepared pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution. In preparing these assessments:

1. I have identified all parcels that will have a special benefit conferred upon them by the Improvements described in Section 2 of this Report (the “Specially Benefited Parcels”). a. For particulars as to the identification of these parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in Section 8 of this Report.

2. I have assessed the estimated costs and expenses of the Improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such assessment:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived from the Improvements by each Specially Benefited Parcel was determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the Improvements;
b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel by the Improvements; and
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit this Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this Report, the assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the Assessment Law.

By:

John G. Egan
Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. 14853

c. The general benefits have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.

Packet Page 402 of 839Attachment 19 Page 24 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 23

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages contain the assessment diagram for the District.

Packet Page 403 of 839Attachment 19 Page 25 of 30

Source: Solano County GIS
Geographic Coordinate Reference: GCS North American 1983 Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane California II FIPS 0402 Feet Sheet 1 of 1

C I T Y O F FA I R F I E L D

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COUNTY OF SOLANO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2023-1 (GATEWAY)
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THIS _____ DAY OF __________, 202__.
___________________________________________

CITY CLERK

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS DIAGRAM SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS FOR THOSE PARCELS LISTED.

C
t
G
a
t
e
w
a
y

C
t
Kensington Dr
Gateway BlGateway Bl
Webster StB Gale Wilson Bl
Dana DrTravis Bl
Truman St2nd S
t
Barton Pl
Barton CtTravis Bl
ClevelandCt
80 Oxford DrKansa
s
StMontezuma CtBristol LnBuckingham DrMarkham CtArguello CtVictoria CtNew Hampshire St Hayes S
t5th StCleve
land
S
tBarton DrHoliday LnAlvarado Ct
Barbour Dr
London CtWilkie StWallace StMichigan St London LnWinston CtAlford Dr Larkin DrHarding
S
t Pennsylvania AvTabor Av
Roosevelt StNew Jersey St
Gr
a
n
t

S
t
Minne
s
ot
a
St
1st StTyler StVan Buren StToland Dr
Westminster Dr Kent WyLi
n
c
o
l
n

S
tPennsylvania AvPennsylvania Av80
9 4
1 18
10 13
14 6
2 43
39 21
12 11
15 38
41 16
5 20
7 22
17 40
3 42
19 23
26 35 24
37 25
36 31
27 3428
32 29
30 33
8 LLMD 2023-1 (Gateway) Boundary
LLMD 2023-1 (Gateway) Parcels
Parcels 0 350 700175 Feet
O
Air Base Pkwy
Walters RdLLMD 2023-1 (Gateway) Boundary
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
O
ID APN
1 0033-220-010
2 0033-220-020
3 0033-220-030
4 0033-220-040
5 0033-220-050
6 0033-220-070
7 0033-220-080
8 0033-220-110
9 0033-230-740
10 0033-230-750
11 0033-230-770
12 0033-230-780
13 0033-230-790
14 0033-230-800
15 0033-230-810
16 0033-230-820
17 0033-230-830
18 0033-230-840
19 0033-230-850
20 0033-230-870
21 0033-230-880
22 0033-230-890
23 0033-230-900
24 0033-240-010
25 0033-240-030
26 0033-240-040
27 0033-240-050
28 0033-240-070
29 0033-240-080
30 0033-240-100
31 0033-240-110
32 0033-240-120
33 0033-240-130
34 0033-240-140
35 0033-240-160
36 0033-240-170
37 0033-240-180
38 0033-250-010
39 0033-250-020
40 0033-250-030
41 0033-250-040
42 0033-250-050
43 0033-250-060
Packet Page 404 of 839Attachment 19 Page 26 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 24

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The following pages contain the proposed 2023/24 assessment roll for the District.

Packet Page 405 of 839Attachment 19 Page 27 of 30

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*10033-220-0101400 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 1.40 0.97 0.96 13.30 $287.88$9,244.71$9,532.5820033-220-0201350 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.69 0.45 0.45 6.34 137.15 4,404.27 4,541.41 30033-220-0301345 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.21 0.08 0.08 1.48 32.10 1,030.91 1,063.01 40033-220-0401315 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 1.68 1.67 1.66 20.03 433.43 13,918.51 14,351.93 50033-220-0501340 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.29 0.13 0.13 2.20 47.66 1,530.62 1,578.28 60033-220-0701310 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.79 0.50 0.49 7.14 154.42 4,958.75 5,113.17 70033-220-0801305 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.23 0.35 0.34 3.69 79.78 2,561.82 2,641.59 80033-220-1101300 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.87 0.69 0.68 8.96 193.84 6,224.82 6,418.66 90033-230-7401550 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 2.74 1.23 1.23 20.81 450.39 14,463.13 14,913.51 100033-230-7501560 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 1.11 0.76 0.07 7.73 167.28 5,371.96 5,539.24 110033-230-7701580 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.51 1.91 1.90 17.29 374.11 12,013.53 12,387.63 120033-230-7801586 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.45 0.31 0.31 4.28 92.60 2,973.69 3,066.28 130033-230-7901590 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.99 0.73 0.72 9.73 210.47 6,758.91 6,969.38 140033-230-8001600 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.79 0.53 0.52 7.35 159.12 5,109.80 5,268.91 150033-230-8101610 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.36 0.33 0.33 4.10 88.70 2,848.26 2,936.95 160033-230-8201650 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.30 0.15 0.14 2.35 50.85 1,633.01 1,683.86 170033-230-8301640 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.31 0.14 0.14 2.36 51.10 1,641.07 1,692.17 180033-230-8402200 GATEWAY CTCommercial2.00 2.00 1.17 1.98 0.73 15.51 335.67 10,779.24 11,114.91 190033-230-850 Commercial2.00 2.00 0.03 - - 0.11 2.40 77.06 79.46 200033-230-8701570 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.32 0.13 0.13 2.28 49.34 1,584.42 1,633.75 210033-230-8801574 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.57 0.41 0.41 5.57 120.58 3,872.26 3,992.84 220033-230-890 Commercial2.00 2.00 0.11 - - 0.43 9.32 299.39 308.70 230033-230-900 Commercial2.00 2.00 0.03 - - 0.13 2.72 87.35 90.07 240033-240-0101300 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.35 0.09 1.45 7.55 163.43 5,248.04 5,411.46 250033-240-0301420 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 2.89 3.44 3.41 38.97 843.25 27,079.16 27,922.41 260033-240-0401450 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.46 0.23 0.23 3.65 78.92 2,534.33 2,613.24 270033-240-0501544 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 3.98 3.63 3.60 44.87 970.84 31,176.15 32,146.98 280033-240-070 Commercial2.00 2.00 0.15 - - 0.59 12.72 408.34 421.05 290033-240-0801519 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.63 0.69 0.68 8.01 173.22 5,562.53 5,735.75 300033-240-1001451 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 2.07 2.05 2.03 24.58 531.96 17,082.73 17,614.69 310033-240-1101795 PENNSYLVANIA AVECommercial2.00 2.00 0.19 0.13 0.13 1.80 39.00 1,252.41 1,291.40 320033-240-1201547 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 2.81 1.73 1.71 25.04 541.79 17,398.24 17,940.02 330033-240-1301350 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 7.19 7.21 7.15 86.18 1,864.89 59,886.64 61,751.53 340033-240-1401495 GATEWAY BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.11 0.32 0.32 3.02 65.30 2,097.03 2,162.32 350033-240-1601340 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.42 0.30 0.30 4.06 87.75 2,818.04 2,905.79 360033-240-1701320 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 3.16 3.67 3.64 41.86 905.88 29,090.37 29,996.25 370033-240-1801320 TRAVIS BLVDCommercial2.00 2.00 0.38 0.14 - 2.09 45.13 1,449.26 1,494.38 380033-250-0101501 GATEWAY CTCommercial2.00 2.00 0.42 0.16 0.15 2.91 62.87 2,018.97 2,081.84 390033-250-0201525 GATEWAY CTCommercial2.00 2.00 0.59 0.16 0.16 3.62 78.31 2,514.64 2,592.94 Packet Page 406 of 839Attachment 19 Page 28 of 30

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-1 (Gateway) 25

10. REFERENCES
Beutz v. Cnty. of Riverside, 184 Cal. App. 4th 1516, 1532 (2010) Broad Beach Geologic Hazard Abatement District v 31506 Victoria Point LLC, B304699 (81 Cal. App. 5th 1068, 1090 (2022))
National Cooperative Highway Research Program, “Transportation Research Board of The National Academies 2009 Annual Report”, 2009.

Coder, Kim D. “Identified Benefits of Community Trees and Forests.” University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service - Forest Resources Publication, October 1996.

Van Dillen, Sonja et. al, “Greenspace in urban neighborhoods and residents’ health: Adding quality to quantity”, 2012.

Crompton, John L. "Parks and Economic Development." American Planning Association, p. 31-48, 2001.

Department of Parks and Recreation, California (DPR). "The Health and Social Benefits of Recreation." Sacramento, CA: California State Parks, March 2005.

Golden Hill Neighborhood Assn. v. City of San Diego CA4/1, D062203 (199 Cal. App. 4th 416, 438 (2011)) Iris Vilnai-Yavetz & Shaked Gilboa (2010) The Effect of Servicescape Cleanliness on Customer Reactions, Services Marketing Quarterly, 10.1080/15332961003604386 Reliance Foundry, “11 Benefits of Streets Trees in Urban Spaces, (2019), ” https://www.reliance- foundry.com/blog/11-benefits-street-trees
Pennsylvania Landscape & Nursery Association, (2022), “About the Green Industry,” https://www.plna.com/page/About_Industry
Kearney, Anne R. "Residential Development Patterns and Neighborhood Satisfaction: Impacts of Density and Nearby Nature." Environment and Behavior, 38, 112-139, 2006.

Rea, Mark S., et al. "Review of the Safety Benefits and Other Effects of Roadway Lighting." National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, June 2009.

Throsby, D. “Cultural heritage as financial asset in strategies for urban development and poverty alleviation.” Paper for International Conference for Integrating Urban Knowledge & Practice, 2005.

Fairfield, City of. “Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Citywide Traffic Counts Map (Updated 2018)”, https://fairfield.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=908b0082da8c47be87fb0689 75b69d35
Fairfield, City of. “City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook”, 2020.

Town of Tiburon v. Bonander, 180 Cal. App. 4th 1057, 1084 (2009) "Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition." Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2022.

Packet Page 408 of 839Attachment 19 Page 30 of 30

nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516

Amended Engineer’s Report For:

City of Fairfield Landscape
Maintenance District No. 2023-3
(Waterman Highlands)
May 2023

Packet Page 409 of 839Attachment 20 Page 1 of 32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 District History ........................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Legislative Context .................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Court Rulings ............................................................................................................. 2

2. IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................. 4

2.1 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ......................................................................... 5

3. BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................ 6

3.1 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ......................................................................... 6

4. SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................... 7

4.1 Parcel Characteristics ................................................................................................ 7

4.2 Land Use .................................................................................................................... 8

4.3 Total Special Benefit Points ..................................................................................... 11

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL BENEFITS ......................................... 12

5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................. 12

5.2 General Benefit Analysis ......................................................................................... 12

6. BUDGET ........................................................................................................................ 15

6.1 Maximum Amount to Be Assessed ......................................................................... 15

6.2 FY 23/24 Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point ............................ 16

6.3 Annual Maximum Assessment Rate Inflation ......................................................... 16

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics ................................................................ 16

6.5 Data for Annual Assessment Calculations ............................................................... 17

6.6 Appeals .................................................................................................................... 17

6.7 Method of Collection .............................................................................................. 18

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT .............................................................................................. 19

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ................................................................................................ 20

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL ........................................................................................................ 21

10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 22 Packet Page 410 of 839Attachment 20 Page 2 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 District History
The City of Fairfield (“City”) desires to fund certain landscaping services and improvements as described in Section 2 of this Report through an annual assessment. The proposed assessment is subject to the substantive and procedural requirements described in Section 4, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Article XIII D”). The assessment is authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq.) (the “Act”).

The City currently has an existing assessment district which funds various services and improvements including landscaping and the associated maintenance, operation, and servicing within the boundary of Maintenance District No. 3 – Waterman Highlands. As the existing assessment district does not provide sufficient revenue for the services and improvements, the City proposes to form a new assessment district that is intended to provide sufficient revenue to fund ongoing annual associated maintenance, operation, and servicing of the landscaping improvements; reserve funds for replacement and repair of the improvements; and an allowance for an annual inflator so the assessment rate may be increased over time as costs increase without conducting a new Article XIII D balloting proceeding. The proposed assessment district is the City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) (“District”).

Article XIII D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 2 (5) Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

1.3.1 GENERAL BENEFIT
Article XIII D requires an agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on the identified parcels because only special benefits are assessable.

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 3 The assessment on a particular property cannot be based on the relative cost of the improvements to the property, but rather on the special benefit conferred on such property. The Court in Tiburon also stated, “an assessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvement or property-related service, less any amount attributable to general benefits (which may not be assessed), allocated to individual properties in proportion to the relative special benefit conferred on the property.”

Packet Page 413 of 839Attachment 20 Page 5 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 4

2. IMPROVEMENTS
The assessments will fund the following maintenance, operation, and servicing activities:
 Street Trees and Other Landscaping
The maintenance, operation, and servicing activities listed above are collectively referred to as the “Improvements.” A general illustration of the location of the landscaping improvements is shown below and the Assessment Diagram can be found in Section 8.

For illustration purposes only, not an official map.

Packet Page 414 of 839Attachment 20 Page 6 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 5

2.1 Street Trees and Other Landscaping
The Improvements include the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street trees and landscaping throughout the boundary of the District, as identified in the above illustrative map. The Improvements are generally described as: the maintenance, operation, and servicing of trees, landscape and appurtenant facilities in the public right of way areas, as well as open space, trails and green belt areas dispersed throughout the District. Eligible District costs may include, but are not limited to, personnel, furnishing electrical energy, utilities such as water and gas, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows:

There is approximately 234,988 square feet of landscape maintenance area and 231 street trees within the District. The general location of the Improvements within the District is described as follows:

1. Easterly and westerly sides of Ten Gate Road commencing at the intersection of Ten Gate Road and Waterman Boulevard.

2. Northerly side of Waterman Boulevard commencing at a point on Waterman Boulevard 650 feet west of its intersection with Ten Gate Road and extending easterly along Waterman Boulevard to its intersection with Hilborn Road. Any turf between the curb and sidewalk within this reach shall be excluded from the maintenance district.

3. Westerly side of Hilborn Road commencing at the intersection of Waterman Boulevard and Hilborn Road and extending northerly along Hilborn Road to its intersection with Vista Grande. Any turf between the curb and sidewalk within this reach shall be excluded from the maintenance district.

4. The open space area and bike trail adjacent to the westerly boundary of the District between Waterman Boulevard and Vista Grande are excluded.

5. All lands owned by the City of Fairfield designated as open space, including fire breaks.

6. All other improvements necessary to maintain and service the above-described facilities within the District.

Maintenance, operation and servicing activities for the following are not included in the cost estimate or in the following benefit analysis:

1. No costs associated with the streetlights shall be borne by the District.

Packet Page 415 of 839Attachment 20 Page 7 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 6

3. BENEFITS
The Improvements will confer special benefits upon certain parcels within the District. These benefits are summarized in the table below:

Improvement Benefit(s)
Street Trees and Other Landscaping Improved Aesthetics
Increased Livability
The special benefits to be conferred by the Improvements are detailed below.

3.1 Street Trees and Other Landscaping

3.1.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS AND LIVABILITY
The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, operation, and servicing of the street trees and other landscaping within the District.

Specifically, the street trees and other landscaping are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within the District and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District. A study by the University of George found "People’s preferences for locating areas of social interactions in calming, beautiful, and nature-dominated areas revolve around the presence of community trees and forests" (Coder, 1996). The same study noted “Large old street trees were found to be the most important indicator of attractiveness in a community” (Coder).

Conversely, "appeal decreases when Improvements are not well maintained, unsafe, or destroyed by vandalism” (The Victoria Transportation Institute, 2011). Streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents and visitors to the community. Therefore, the street trees and other landscaping Improvements will confer aesthetic benefits to properties in close proximity.

Livability is a measurement of the factors that add up to a community’s quality of life—including but not limited to the built and natural environments, economic prosperity, social stability and equity, cultural, entertainment and recreation possibilities. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute explains that “Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community...” In addition, the presence of natural areas and green landscapes are positively related to neighborhood satisfaction (Kearney, 2006). The presence of street trees has been shown to encourage increased physical activity and increased social cohesion in the urban environment (VanDillen et al., 2012). Therefore, the street trees and other landscaping will confer livability benefits.

Packet Page 416 of 839Attachment 20 Page 8 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 7

4.1.1 BUILDING FACTOR
The average building size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 1,869.16 square feet. Each assessable parcel’s actual building size was divided by the District’s average building size to determine a Building Factor.

Parcel's Building
Square Feet / District's Average
Building Square Feet = Parcel's
Building Factor

4.1.2 LOT FACTOR
The average lot size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 8,532.14 square feet.

Each assessable parcel’s actual lot square footage was divided by the District’s average lot square footage to determine a Lot Factor.

Parcel's Lot
Square Feet / District's Average
Lot Square Feet = Parcel's
Lot Factor

4.1.3 ADT FACTOR
The average daily trip (ADT) count for all assessable parcels within the District is 9.58 trips. Each assessable parcel’s ADT was divided by the District’s ADT to determine the parcel’s ADT factor.

Parcel's
Trips / District's Average Trips =Parcel's
ADT Factor
Packet Page 417 of 839Attachment 20 Page 9 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 8 Assessable parcels were assigned trip generation rates by land use classification in accordance with the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). Per the ITE Trip Generation User’s Guide, a “Trip” is defined as a “single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination (exiting and entering) inside a study site. For trip generation purposes, the total number of trips for a land use over a given period of time are the total of all trips entering plus all trips exiting a site during a designated time period.”
The ADT rates used in this analysis are shown in the table below. ADT rates came from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), unless otherwise noted. For land uses with multiple ITE Codes, an average trip value was used for the ADT rate. Only those land use classifications currently being assessed at the time of preparation of this report are included below. Any future changes to a parcel’s land use classification resulting in changes to the parcel’s ADT rates will be based on the values found in the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

Assisted Living Property consists of parcels used for residential care, providing assistance with activities and daily living and social care.

Golf Course Clubhouse Property consists of parcels utilized for club houses, locker rooms, maintenance facilities, prop shops, restaurants or banquet facilities.

Multi-Family Residential Property consists of parcels that are duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and condominiums used exclusively for residential purposes.

Park Property consists of certain park parcels that are not being maintained by the District or included as part of the District Improvements.

Packet Page 418 of 839Attachment 20 Page 10 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 9 Public Property consists of parcels used for public purposes including golf courses, police and fire stations, public schools, libraries, and other government administration buildings.

Single Family Residential Property consists of parcels that have stand-alone residential dwelling units with their own lots intended for one family.

Undeveloped Property consists of parcels with no structure value.

There are currently a total of 255 assessable parcels within the District. Additionally, there are 7 parcels in the District deemed to receive no benefit from the Improvements and are therefore non-assessable. These parcels include, but are not limited to: conservation easements, restricted use parcels, streets, right of ways, and parcels which are the Improvements themselves. Typical Solano County use codes include, but are not limited to 6100, 6400, 6462, 6463, 6464, 9100, 9600, and 9700.

4.2.1 APPORTIONING AESTHETIC BENEFIT
The Aesthetic Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. The benefit of visual appeal is not restricted to a particular land use. A more attractive public environment specially benefits all parcels irrespective of land use classification. Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Aesthetic Benefit Point. However, Undeveloped land use classifications will be assigned 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Point due to the nature of the land use. Per the definition in Section 3.2.1, “the street trees and other landscaping are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within the District and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District.” As such, there is some aesthetic benefit conferred by the Improvements on undeveloped land use classifications. However, this benefit is limited, as undeveloped parcels are not utilized as areas recognized in the definition of aesthetic benefit of social interactions, areas where residents are likely to walk, areas of stimulated economic activity or locations that will attract residents and/or visitors to the community. Therefore, the undeveloped land use classifications are assigned the reduced 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Points due to the nature of the land use compared to the developed land use classifications. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

Additionally, all land use classifications located in proximity to interior landscaping will experience a greater level of aesthetic benefits compared to other land use classifications. To account for this added benefit, Undeveloped parcels designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.03 benefit points for Aesthetic and all other land uses designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.05 benefit points for Aesthetic. For example, Single Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) land uses are assigned a benefit point of 1.05 and Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 0.28 for Aesthetic. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 10 parcels. Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT Factor are used to measure Aesthetic Benefits.

The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.2 APPORTIONING LIVABILITY BENEFIT
The Livability Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. Livability represents the desirability to reside in an area based on the characteristics of the environment that make an area a more attractive place to live. Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Livability Benefit Point. However, undeveloped land use classifications will be assigned 0.25 Livability Benefit Point due to the nature of the land use. Per the definition in Section

3.2.1, livability is a measurement of factors that add up to a community’s quality of life. The presence of natural areas and green landscapes are positively related to neighborhood satisfaction. As such, there is some livability benefit conferred by the Improvements on undeveloped land use classifications. However, this benefit is limited, as undeveloped parcels are not utilized as areas recognized in the definition of livability benefit for “economic prosperity, social stability and equity, cultural, entertainment or recreation possibilities.” Therefore, the undeveloped land use classifications are assigned the reduced 0.25 Livability Benefit Points due to the nature of the land use compared to the developed land use classifications.

Additionally, all land use classifications located in proximity to interior landscaping will experience a greater level of livability benefits compared to other land use classifications. To account for this added benefit, Undeveloped parcels designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.03 benefit points for Livability and all other land uses designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.05 benefit points for Livability. For example, Single Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) land uses are assigned a benefit point of 1.05 and Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 0.28 for Livability. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

As a property-related benefit, improved livability from tree and landscaping Improvements can be measured by the characteristics of a parcel, namely the size of a building, its size, and trip generation.

Larger parcels and parcels with larger developments have a greater intensity of use and will experience the Livability Benefits to a greater degree than smaller, less-developed parcels. Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT Factor are used to measure Livability Benefits. The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.3 LAND USE BENEFIT POINTS
The tables below summarize the Land Use Benefit Points assigned to the various assessable land use classifications within the District:

Street Trees and Other
Landscaping

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 11

Street Trees and Other
Landscaping

Land Use Classification Per Aesthetic Livability
Total Landscaping
Land Use Benefit
Points
Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Multi-Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10 Assisted Living Parcel 1 1 2
Assisted Living (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10 Commercial Parcel 1 1 2
Commercial (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10 Golf Course Clubhouse Parcel 1 1 2
Golf Course Clubhouse (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10 Park Parcel 1 1 2
Park (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10
Public Parcel 1 1 2
Public (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.05 1.05 2.10
Undeveloped Parcel 0.25 0.25 0.50
Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 0.28 0.28 0.56

The Total Special Benefit Points are computed for each parcel in the District and summed. The Total District Special Benefit Points are 1,472.88. These Total District Special Benefit Points are used to determine the proposed assessment amounts on each parcel.

Packet Page 421 of 839Attachment 20 Page 13 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 12

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL

5.1 Summary
As detailed below, it is estimated the Improvements will confer an Overall General Benefit of 20.25%.

5.2 General Benefit Analysis

Land Use Classification
Institute of
Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE)
Value(s)
Average
Daily Trip
Rate Rate Per
Total
Parcels/
Units
Estimated
Daily District
Vehicle Trips
Single Family Residential 210-SFR Detached
Housing 9.43 Dwelling
unit 245 2,310.35
Public 730 – Government
Office Building 22.59 1,000 sq.
ft. GFA 1 36.55
Total: 2,346.90

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 13 and Waterman Boulevard. Roadway design capacities, as defined in the City of Fairfield’s Travel Demand Forecasting Model, were estimated based on the functional classification of the roadway, the number of lanes, and the City’s minimum recommended Level of Service “C” (City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook 2020). Roadway design capacity was calculated for the higher functional classification roadways (henceforth referred to as the “Major Roads”) identified above in order to estimate the total daily traffic flow through the District.

Using the methodology described above, the estimated pass-through vehicular traffic through the District is 97.67% as summarized in the table below:

Average Vehicle
Trips Through
District
Estimated District
Generated Vehicle
Trips
Estimated Pass
Through Vehicle
Traffic
Pass Through
%
100,800 (1) - 2,346.90 = 98,453.10 97.67%
(1) Equals the design capacity of each roadway, reduced by 25% to recognize the City’s recommended “C” Level of Service. Breakdown by street name below.

The table below separates the weighted vehicular pass-through percentage factors by street name for the Major Roads traversing the District.

Street Name
Vehicle Trips
Passing-Through
District
% of Total
Roadway Design
Capacity (1)
Weighted Vehicle
Pass-Through %
Factor (2)
Hilborn Road 50,400 50.00% 48.84%
Waterman Boulevard 50,400 50.00% 48.84%
Total: 100,800 97.67% (3)
(1) Equals (Vehicle Trips Passing Through District on Roadway / Total Vehicle Trips Passing Through District). (2) Equals (% of Total Roadway Design Capacity x Pass Through %). (3) Does not add due to rounding.

Additionally, there are bike lanes present on Waterman Boulevard, which provides added roadway capacity in the form of additional lanes in the roadway cross-section designated exclusively for the use of bicycles. The Federal Highway Administration’s Technical Report entitled “Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities” was utilized to estimate the additional roadway capacity provided by the bike lanes based on the type of facility (namely on-street bicycle facilities), the number of lanes, and the City’s minimum recommended Level of Service “C” (City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook 2020). An estimated pass-through bicycle traffic percentage of 97.67% was utilized, consistent with the estimated pass-through vehicular traffic percentage through the District calculated above.

However, simply estimating the number of pass-through vehicle and bicycle trips does not necessarily indicate the level of benefit accruing to vehicles passing through the District. We must look at each of the Improvements individually.

5.2.2 GENERAL BENEFIT: STREET TREES AND OTHER LANDSCAPING Certain street trees and other landscaping to be funded by the assessment are on the Major Roads as described previously. Accordingly, some of the aesthetic and livability benefits will be conferred to traffic passing through the District. An analysis of the street trees and landscaping areas within the District was Packet Page 423 of 839Attachment 20 Page 15 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 14 conducted and whenever street trees and landscaping areas were located within close proximity to the Major Roads, those trees were considered as belonging to the Major Roads.

The landscaping Improvements are located throughout the District. Although interior streets are intended to serve individual neighborhoods, one could imagine a small degree of “tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the views of the homes, the natural surroundings or perhaps lost on their way to their intended destination. As such, approximately 2% is attributable to vehicles passing through on interior streets. Additionally, there are bike lanes on Waterman Boulevard and this is recognized as contributing additional general benefit to the street trees and other landscaping Improvements.

As summarized in the table below, the Effective General Benefit percentage from the Landscaping Improvements is 20.25%.

Roadways with Landscaping
Improvements
Feet of Roadway
with
Landscaping
Improvements
% of Total
Landscaping
Improvements (1)
Weighted
Vehicle Pass-
Through %
Factor
Effective
General
Benefit % (2)
Hilborn Road 1,568 18.19% 48.84% 8.88%
Waterman Boulevard 1,600 18.56% 48.84% 9.06%
Bike Lanes - - - 1.04% (3)
Interior Residential Landscaping 5,453 63.25% 2.00% 1.27% Total: 8,621 20.25% (5)
(1) Equals (Feet of Roadway with Landscaping Improvements / 8,621). (2) Equals (% of Total Landscaping Improvements x Weighted Vehicle Pass-Through % Factor). (3) Equals (Capacity per lane per hour [60] x number of bike lanes [2] x 24 hours) / (Design Capacity for Waterman Blvd.) (4) Does not add due to rounding.

5.2.3 OVERALL GENERAL BENEFIT
The table below is a summary of the Overall General Benefit for the District.

General Benefit Category
General
Benefit %
Street Trees and Other Landscaping 20.25%
Overall General Benefit: 20.25%

Packet Page 424 of 839Attachment 20 Page 16 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 15

6. BUDGET
The following table summarizes the estimated annual costs to fund the Improvements for Fiscal Year 2023/24:

Description Amount
Landscaping and Street Trees
Landscape Maintenance $70,497
Tree Maintenance 13,475
Weed Abatement 2,788
Irrigation 46,000
Irrigation Parts and Repairs 11,749
Contingency (5%) 7,067
Reserves (5%) 7,067
Subtotal Landscaping: $158,643
Administration
City Staff Costs $11,719
County Fees 1,493
Engineer/Consultant Costs 8,000
Subtotal Administration 21,213
Total Cost of Improvements $179,856

The following table breaks down the estimated annual costs from above for Fiscal Year 2023/24. The Landscaping Budget, the % of Budget and the General Benefit Percentages by Improvement type utilized in the Table below have been rounded. The final assessment rates listed in Section 9 have been truncated to two decimal places.

Budget
Special
Benefit
Admin
Budget (1) Total
Special Benefit
Points (SBP)
Rate per
SBP
$158,643 $ 126,518 $21,213 $147,731 1,472.88 $100.3007
(1) Includes $1,493 for County fees, $8,000 for Engineer/Consultant costs and $11,719 for City staff costs.

Equals (Total Admin Budget x % of Budget).

Packet Page 425 of 839Attachment 20 Page 17 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 16 Description Amount
Total Cost of Improvements $179,856
Less General Benefit Portion (20.25%) (32,125)
Total Cost of Improvements to Be Assessed $147,729 (1)
(1) The final assessment rates in Section 9 have been truncated to two decimal places.

6.2 FY 23/24 Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point The Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point is calculated by dividing the total costs to be Assessed by the total Special Benefit Points assigned to the parcels within the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per Special Benefit Point.

Total Costs to be Assessed / Total Special Benefit Points = ($147,730.74) (1,472.88)

Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point
($100.3007)
The Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point for each Improvement Type is then multiplied by each parcel’s total special benefit points to determine the maximum assessment amount per parcel.

6.3 Annual Maximum Assessment Rate Inflation
Each parcel’s maximum assessment is determined by multiplying the maximum assessment rate per special benefit point by the parcel’s total special benefit points. If the total special benefit points for all assessable parcels in the District change in future years, the maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point will not be recalculated. The maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point, plus the annual cost of living inflator, will remain fixed. The actual annual assessment rate per special benefit point will be calculated by dividing the fiscal year’s total cost of improvements to be assessed by the total special benefit points, not to exceed the maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point for that fiscal year. The maximum allowable assessment rate per special benefit point is escalated each year on July 1 by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually, beginning July 1, 2024.

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 17 within the District that increases the overall building square footage, for example, will lead to possible increased assessment revenue, even if the assessment rate per special benefit point is not increased. By way of example, when a previously undeveloped parcel develops into a single family residential land use classification, the parcel will no longer be assessed as an undeveloped land use, but rather as a single family residential parcel with the updated parcel characteristics.

As of 2023/24, there are 10 lots that have been assigned multiple Assessor Parcel Numbers because the lots are split by multiple tax rate areas. For purposes of the calculations within, the assessments have been calculated to recognize the full lot square footage of the entire lot and the resulting assessment assigned to the Assessor Parcel Number for such lot that is taxable for County property tax purposes.

If the review conducted by the City or its designated consultant results in the approval for changes to any parcel characteristics used to compute the assessment, the City or its designated consultant shall recalculate the assessment. When recalculating the assessment, the assessment rates actually applied in such fiscal year shall be used. Only the assessment for the parcel or parcels subject to review shall be recalculated.

Packet Page 427 of 839Attachment 20 Page 19 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 18 The credit may be provided in the form of a check issued to the property owner, an adjustment to the current year’s property tax roll (if possible), or a credit to the succeeding year’s assessment thereby reducing the amount placed on the secured property tax roll for such year.

In any dispute over parcel characteristic data used to compute assessments, the City Manager (or his/her designee) shall make a conclusive determination and its decision shall be final.

Packet Page 428 of 839Attachment 20 Page 20 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 19

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT
The City of Fairfield Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) assessments described in this Report have been prepared pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution. In preparing these assessments:

2. I have assessed the estimated costs and expenses of the Improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such assessment:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived from the Improvements by each Specially Benefited Parcel was determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the Improvements;
b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel by the Improvements; and
c. The general benefits have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.

I, the undersigned, respectfully submit this Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this Report, the assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the Assessment Law.

By:

John G. Egan
Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. 14853

Packet Page 429 of 839Attachment 20 Page 21 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 20

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages contain the assessment diagram for the District.

Packet Page 430 of 839Attachment 20 Page 22 of 32

Source: Solano County GIS
Geographic Coordinate Reference: GCS North American 1983 Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane California II FIPS 0402 Feet Sheet 1 of 1

C I T Y O F FA I R F I E L D

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COUNTY OF SOLANO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2023-3 (WATERMAN HIGHLANDS)
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THIS _____ DAY OF __________, 202__.
___________________________________________

CITY CLERK

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS DIAGRAM SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS FOR THOSE PARCELS LISTED.

FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF SOLANO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAIL CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH LOTS OR PARCELS. 12 80
80 80
1212
80 252
253
251
261
159
20 49
171
250
21260
67 177
196
102
3 73
209
262
191
208
69 2405
76 4
1 167
15 178
12 234
26 104
16 2
6 14
11 13
37 195
7 220
19 221
10 80 21858 189136
40 17
53 241
39 129
11318
175
8 247
235259
72 192112
103
18877212187
9 19021729
27134 164
132
183
66 232
245
205213
173
204
108
207
249244214
165
54 258
41135
166
219
211130
59 68
231
215176216101138 21015428
222 239206
255
15219396
233
22 170
100
1 3
3 25
257
194
197
48 107
114
168128
182
99 181
153
256
64 8165
172162230
246
38127 184
23229
50 185 22890
60 62
15863
16 310598
198
2 4
70 42223115
45 61
88 74
56 24822479
11694121
17 4
31 111
92 52
34 4386 17951
3044126 242254
47 12257
139
18618055
1697
8 117110106
32 15613115783141
199
16015536
140
146202125200
201
142203 2272252432
3 8
97 12011911833
35 14514822612314384
109
1614
6 14912414415071 1511472
3 6
2 3
7 75858287
91 93
89 137
95 Hi
lborn
RdClipper Ship DrAlturasCtTea CtWh
i
s
p
e
r
i
n
gOa
k
s
C
t
Palmer CtWater
man
BlSilk CtVista del RanchoVistaBuenaVista Boni
t
a
Vista
Alta
Vista
Linda
Monterey DrPortola CtChina Ct
Weather
Wax Ct
Boston
C
t
Lighthouse DrClippe
r
C
tCanton CtTen Ga
te
Rd
Penn
Cr
e
e
k
Dr
Hi
g
h
P
o
i
n
t
e

C
t
Howla
n
d
Ct
Clipper
L
n
Tuckaw
a
y
Ct
Royal Ct
Carmel Wy
Canton Ln
Vista Cerro
Trinidad PlVista Luna
Lighthouse

C
t
Top Gal
l
a
n
t

C
tWhispe
r
ing
Oaks
D
r
Palmer
Ci
r Ch
i
n
a

L
n
Vista HermosaHilborn RdAspin
w
all
CtPomona PlVista Grande
Vista Seren
a
Martin RdBent Tree CtMainsail Ct
Watso
n
Ct Trevino Wy
Vista Palomar80LLMD 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) Boundary LLMD 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) Parcels
Parcels 0 300 600150 Feet
O
Air Base Pkwy
Walters RdLLMD 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) Boundary
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
O

ID APN ID APN ID APN
1 0156-081-010 101 0156-093-260 201 0156-112-050
2 0156-081-020 102 0156-093-270 202 0156-112-060
3 0156-081-030 103 0156-093-280 203 0156-112-070
4 0156-081-040 104 0156-093-290 204 0156-112-080
5 0156-081-050 105 0156-093-300 205 0156-113-080
6 0156-081-060 106 0156-093-310 206 0156-113-110
7 0156-081-070 107 0156-093-320 207 0156-113-120
8 0156-081-080 108 0156-093-330 208 0156-113-130
9 0156-081-090 109 0156-093-340 209 0156-113-140
10 0156-081-100 110 0156-093-350 210 0156-113-150
11 0156-081-110 111 0156-093-360 211 0156-113-160
12 0156-081-120 112 0156-093-370 212 0156-113-170
13 0156-081-130 113 0156-093-380 213 0156-113-180
14 0156-081-140 114 0156-094-010 214 0156-113-190
15 0156-081-150 115 0156-094-020 215 0156-113-200
16 0156-081-160 116 0156-094-030 216 0156-113-210
17 0156-081-170 117 0156-094-040 217 0156-113-220
18 0156-081-180 118 0156-094-050 218 0156-113-230
19 0156-081-190 119 0156-094-060 219 0156-113-240
20 0156-081-200 120 0156-094-070 220 0156-113-250
21 0156-081-210 121 0156-094-080 221 0156-113-260
22 0156-082-010 122 0156-094-090 222 0156-113-270
23 0156-082-020 123 0156-094-100 223 0156-113-280
24 0156-082-030 124 0156-094-110 224 0156-113-290
25 0156-082-040 125 0156-094-120 225 0156-113-300
26 0156-082-050 126 0156-094-130 226 0156-113-310
27 0156-082-060 127 0156-094-140 227 0156-113-320
28 0156-082-070 128 0156-094-150 228 0156-113-330
29 0156-082-080 129 0156-094-160 229 0156-113-340
30 0156-082-090 130 0156-094-170 230 0156-113-350
31 0156-082-100 131 0156-094-180 231 0156-113-360
32 0156-082-110 132 0156-094-190 232 0156-113-370
33 0156-082-120 133 0156-094-200 233 0156-113-380
34 0156-082-130 134 0156-094-210 234 0156-113-390
35 0156-082-140 135 0156-094-220 235 0156-113-400
36 0156-082-150 136 0156-094-230 236 0156-113-410
37 0156-082-160 137 0156-094-240 237 0156-113-420
38 0156-082-170 138 0156-094-250 238 0156-113-430
39 0156-082-180 139 0156-101-010 239 0156-113-440
40 0156-082-190 140 0156-101-020 240 0156-113-450
41 0156-082-200 141 0156-101-030 241 0156-113-460
42 0156-082-210 142 0156-101-040 242 0156-113-470
43 0156-082-220 143 0156-101-050 243 0156-113-480
44 0156-082-230 144 0156-101-060 244 0156-113-490
45 0156-082-240 145 0156-101-070 245 0156-113-500
46 0156-082-250 146 0156-101-080 246 0156-113-510
47 0156-082-260 147 0156-101-090 247 0156-113-520
48 0156-082-270 148 0156-101-100 248 0156-113-530
49 0156-082-280 149 0156-101-110 249 0156-113-550
50 0156-082-290 150 0156-101-120 250 0156-120-160
51 0156-082-300 151 0156-101-130 251 0156-120-260
52 0156-082-310 152 0156-101-140 252 0156-120-270
53 0156-083-010 153 0156-101-150 253 0156-120-280
54 0156-083-020 154 0156-101-160 254 0156-120-300
55 0156-083-030 155 0156-101-170 255 0156-370-010
56 0156-083-040 156 0156-101-180 256 0156-370-020
57 0156-083-050 157 0156-101-190 257 0156-370-030
58 0156-083-060 158 0156-101-200 258 0156-370-040
59 0156-083-070 159 0156-101-210 259 0156-370-050
60 0156-091-010 160 0156-102-010 260 0156-370-060
61 0156-091-020 161 0156-102-020 261 0156-370-070
62 0156-091-030 162 0156-102-030 262 0156-370-080
63 0156-091-040 163 0156-102-040
64 0156-091-050 164 0156-102-050
65 0156-091-060 165 0156-102-060
66 0156-091-070 166 0156-102-070
67 0156-091-080 167 0156-102-080
68 0156-092-010 168 0156-102-090
69 0156-092-020 169 0156-102-100
70 0156-092-030 170 0156-102-110
71 0156-092-040 171 0156-102-120
72 0156-092-050 172 0156-102-130
73 0156-092-060 173 0156-102-140
74 0156-092-070 174 0156-102-150
75 0156-092-080 175 0156-102-170
76 0156-093-010 176 0156-102-180
77 0156-093-020 177 0156-102-190
78 0156-093-030 178 0156-102-200
79 0156-093-040 179 0156-102-210
80 0156-093-050 180 0156-102-220
81 0156-093-060 181 0156-102-230
82 0156-093-070 182 0156-102-240
83 0156-093-080 183 0156-102-250
84 0156-093-090 184 0156-102-260
85 0156-093-100 185 0156-102-310
86 0156-093-110 186 0156-102-320
87 0156-093-120 187 0156-102-330
88 0156-093-130 188 0156-102-380
89 0156-093-140 189 0156-102-390
90 0156-093-150 190 0156-102-400
91 0156-093-160 191 0156-102-410
92 0156-093-170 192 0156-102-420
93 0156-093-180 193 0156-102-430
94 0156-093-190 194 0156-102-440
95 0156-093-200 195 0156-102-450
96 0156-093-210 196 0156-102-460
97 0156-093-220 197 0156-111-020
98 0156-093-230 198 0156-112-020
99 0156-093-240 199 0156-112-030
100 0156-093-250 200 0156-112-040
Packet Page 431 of 839Attachment 20 Page 23 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 21

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The following pages contain the proposed 2023/24 assessment roll for the District.

Packet Page 432 of 839Attachment 20 Page 24 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*1 0156-081-010 2601 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.24 0.80 0.98 6.05 $606.742 0156-081-020 2237 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.92 1.63 0.98 7.07 709.553 0156-081-030 2231 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.96 1.06 0.98 5.99 601.254 0156-081-040 2600 HOWLAND CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.16 0.79 0.98 5.87 589.055 0156-081-050 2606 HOWLAND CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.24 1.06 0.98 6.57 659.116 0156-081-060 2613 HOWLAND CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.07 1.06 0.98 6.23 624.557 0156-081-070 2607 HOWLAND CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.01 1.19 0.98 6.36 637.818 0156-081-080 2213 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.01 0.79 0.98 5.58 559.439 0156-081-090 2207 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.94 1.06 0.98 5.96 598.0510 0156-081-100 2201 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.02 0.79 0.98 5.59 561.1011 0156-081-110 2616 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.09 1.06 0.98 6.26 627.6512 0156-081-120 2622 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.09 1.19 0.98 6.54 655.7013 0156-081-130 2628 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.07 1.06 0.98 6.22 623.8714 0156-081-140 2631 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.06 1.19 0.98 6.48 649.7315 0156-081-150 2625 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.17 1.08 0.98 6.48 649.8516 0156-081-160 2619 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.08 1.71 0.98 7.54 756.6617 0156-081-170 2613 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.96 1.19 0.98 6.26 627.8718 0156-081-180 2607 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.92 0.84 0.98 5.50 551.8919 0156-081-190 2601 ASPINWALL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.02 0.67 0.98 5.34 535.8320 0156-081-200 No Benefit - - - - - 21 0156-081-210 No Benefit - - - - - 22 0156-082-010 2597 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.74 0.90 0.98 5.25 526.1323 0156-082-020 2591 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.62 1.10 0.98 5.42 544.0924 0156-082-030 2585 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.64 0.80 0.98 4.86 487.7725 0156-082-040 2215 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.86 0.67 0.98 5.03 504.7926 0156-082-050 2209 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.09 0.80 0.98 5.75 576.4127 0156-082-060 2203 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.87 0.90 0.98 5.50 551.1928 0156-082-070 2200 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.83 1.10 0.98 5.84 585.9829 0156-082-080 2206 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.86 0.87 0.98 5.44 545.3930 0156-082-090 2212 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.94 495.0031 0156-082-100 2218 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.58 1.19 0.98 5.51 552.4232 0156-082-110 2224 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.87 0.98 4.81 481.9833 0156-082-120 2230 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 0.67 0.98 4.51 451.8934 0156-082-130 2236 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.57 0.80 0.98 4.72 473.8535 0156-082-140 2242 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 0.87 0.98 4.93 494.5536 0156-082-150 2248 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.67 0.98 4.49 449.8537 0156-082-160 2254 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.13 0.80 0.98 5.84 586.0938 0156-082-170 2260 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.69 0.90 0.98 5.15 516.5339 0156-082-180 2259 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.88 1.10 0.98 5.93 595.2040 0156-082-190 2253 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.04 1.10 0.98 6.25 627.0441 0156-082-200 2247 CLIPPER CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.74 0.90 0.98 5.25 526.71Packet Page 433 of 839Attachment 20 Page 25 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*42 0156-082-210 2586 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.90 0.98 5.02 503.8143 0156-082-220 2592 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 1.10 0.98 5.39 540.1844 0156-082-230 2598 CLIPPER LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.62 0.80 0.98 4.81 482.7645 0156-082-240 2599 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.80 0.98 4.94 495.8646 0156-082-250 2593 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.56 1.10 0.98 5.30 531.3447 0156-082-260 2587 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.94 495.1148 0156-082-270 2581 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.87 0.98 5.07 508.5449 0156-082-280 No Benefit - - - - - 50 0156-082-290 2575 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.87 0.90 0.98 5.50 551.8551 0156-082-300 2569 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.64 0.67 0.98 4.58 459.5152 0156-082-310 2563 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.64 1.10 0.98 5.45 547.0053 0156-083-010 2554 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.95 0.90 0.98 5.67 568.5954 0156-083-020 2300 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.76 0.90 0.98 5.29 530.4055 0156-083-030 2306 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.80 0.98 4.75 476.2056 0156-083-040 2312 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 1.10 0.98 5.40 541.8157 0156-083-050 2318 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.66 0.90 0.98 5.09 510.3358 0156-083-060 2509 CHINA CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.96 1.10 0.98 6.10 611.3559 0156-083-070 2503 CHINA CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.86 0.90 0.98 5.48 550.0860 0156-091-010 2373 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.94 495.1161 0156-091-020 2369 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.10 0.98 5.26 527.1462 0156-091-030 2363 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.80 0.98 4.65 466.8263 0156-091-040 2357 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 1.16 0.98 5.45 547.0964 0156-091-050 2351 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.95 496.0865 0156-091-060 2345 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.90 0.98 5.12 513.7666 0156-091-070 2602 BOSTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.90 0.98 5.13 514.8967 0156-091-080 2608 BOSTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.75 0.90 0.98 5.26 527.1168 0156-092-010 2611 BOSTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.93 1.10 0.98 6.03 604.8269 0156-092-020 2605 BOSTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.31 1.35 0.98 7.27 729.5070 0156-092-030 2337 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 0.90 0.98 4.98 499.7071 0156-092-040 2331 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 1.10 0.98 5.37 538.5272 0156-092-050 2325 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.65 0.90 0.98 5.07 508.6873 0156-092-060 2319 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.02 0.80 0.98 5.61 563.0374 0156-092-070 No Benefit - - - - - 75 0156-092-080 No Benefit - - - - - 76 0156-093-010 2580 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.27 0.90 0.98 6.30 631.4377 0156-093-020 2586 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.86 1.10 0.98 5.90 591.5178 0156-093-030 2592 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.87 0.98 4.80 480.9979 0156-093-040 2598 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.90 0.98 5.03 504.1780 0156-093-050 2306 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.94 0.90 0.98 5.64 565.9581 0156-093-060 2312 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.74 0.67 0.98 4.79 480.5382 0156-093-070 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - Packet Page 434 of 839Attachment 20 Page 26 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*83 0156-093-080 2318 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.74 0.90 0.98 5.25 526.7684 0156-093-090 2324 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.80 1.10 0.98 5.77 578.6085 0156-093-100 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 86 0156-093-110 2330 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.82 1.10 0.98 5.82 583.9687 0156-093-120 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 88 0156-093-130 2336 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 1.12 0.98 5.89 590.6889 0156-093-140 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 90 0156-093-150 2342 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 0.80 0.98 5.25 526.7091 0156-093-160 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 92 0156-093-170 2348 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 0.67 0.98 4.92 493.7293 0156-093-180 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 94 0156-093-190 2354 TEN GATE RD Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.97 0.84 0.98 5.58 560.1795 0156-093-200 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 96 0156-093-210 2353 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.72 0.80 0.98 5.01 502.1197 0156-093-220 2347 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 1.10 0.98 5.44 546.0498 0156-093-230 2341 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 1.14 0.98 5.46 548.0199 0156-093-240 2335 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.76 1.10 0.98 5.70 571.27100 0156-093-250 2329 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 0.90 0.98 5.38 539.76101 0156-093-260 2328 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.10 0.98 5.79 581.00102 0156-093-270 2334 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.51 0.90 0.98 6.79 680.71103 0156-093-280 2340 CANTON CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.94 0.80 0.98 5.46 547.25104 0156-093-290 2581 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.15 0.90 0.98 6.07 609.12105 0156-093-300 2351 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.66 0.90 0.98 5.08 509.08106 0156-093-310 2345 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.67 0.98 4.38 439.45107 0156-093-320 2339 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.73 0.90 0.98 5.22 523.33108 0156-093-330 2333 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.78 0.90 0.98 5.33 534.57109 0156-093-340 2327 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.10 0.98 5.26 527.14110 0156-093-350 2321 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.80 0.98 4.65 466.82111 0156-093-360 2315 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.94 495.11112 0156-093-370 2568 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 0.87 0.98 5.39 540.59113 0156-093-380 2574 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.89 1.10 0.98 5.97 598.30114 0156-094-010 2324 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.90 0.98 5.12 513.45115 0156-094-020 2330 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.90 0.98 5.03 504.92116 0156-094-030 2336 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.80 0.98 4.85 486.03117 0156-094-040 2342 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 0.90 0.98 4.99 500.71118 0156-094-050 2348 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.57 1.10 0.98 5.33 534.28119 0156-094-060 2354 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 0.80 0.98 4.64 465.65120 0156-094-070 2360 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.10 0.98 5.24 525.96121 0156-094-080 2366 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.90 0.98 4.94 495.11122 0156-094-090 2372 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.67 0.98 4.38 439.45123 0156-094-100 2378 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.11 0.98 5.26 527.57Packet Page 435 of 839Attachment 20 Page 27 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*124 0156-094-110 2384 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.10 0.98 5.26 527.14125 0156-094-120 2390 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 0.90 0.98 4.85 486.14126 0156-094-130 2396 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 0.67 0.98 4.51 452.27127 0156-094-140 2402 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.85 1.10 0.98 5.87 589.06128 0156-094-150 2408 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.80 0.90 0.98 5.37 538.59129 0156-094-160 2407 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.88 1.10 0.98 5.93 594.99130 0156-094-170 2401 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.76 0.80 0.98 5.09 511.02131 0156-094-180 2395 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 0.87 0.98 4.94 495.82132 0156-094-190 2389 CHINA LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.89 1.10 0.98 5.96 597.62133 0156-094-200 2572 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.90 0.98 5.12 513.78134 0156-094-210 2578 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.10 0.98 5.79 581.02135 0156-094-220 2584 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.75 0.67 0.98 4.81 482.36136 0156-094-230 2590 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.26 1.16 0.98 6.81 683.38137 0156-094-240 Por. Of adjacent lot - - - - - 138 0156-094-250 2596 CANTON LN Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.66 0.90 0.98 5.09 510.26139 0156-101-010 2412 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.57 1.15 0.98 5.41 543.03140 0156-101-020 2418 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.92 0.98 4.97 498.67141 0156-101-030 2424 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 1.15 0.98 5.45 546.37142 0156-101-040 2430 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.57 1.02 0.98 5.13 514.87143 0156-101-050 2436 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.15 0.98 5.33 534.66144 0156-101-060 2442 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 0.92 0.98 4.86 487.01145 0156-101-070 2448 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.15 0.98 5.33 534.66146 0156-101-080 2454 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.02 0.98 5.06 507.18147 0156-101-090 2460 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.15 0.98 5.33 534.66148 0156-101-100 2466 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 0.92 0.98 4.86 487.01149 0156-101-110 2472 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.15 0.98 5.33 534.66150 0156-101-120 2478 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.53 1.02 0.98 5.06 507.18151 0156-101-130 2484 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.15 0.98 5.35 536.92152 0156-101-140 2490 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.75 0.92 0.98 5.31 532.20153 0156-101-150 2518 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.82 1.10 0.98 5.81 583.16154 0156-101-160 2524 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.75 0.67 0.98 4.80 481.54155 0156-101-170 2530 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 1.02 0.98 5.17 518.75156 0156-101-180 2536 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 1.10 0.98 5.35 536.49157 0156-101-190 2542 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.92 0.98 4.97 498.69158 0156-101-200 2548 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.62 0.67 0.98 4.55 456.01159 0156-101-210 No Benefit - - - - - 160 0156-102-010 2557 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.58 0.80 0.98 4.73 474.04161 0156-102-020 2551 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.10 0.98 5.26 527.14162 0156-102-030 2545 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 0.90 0.98 5.39 540.16163 0156-102-040 2301 SILK CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.87 0.98 5.08 509.37164 0156-102-050 2307 SILK CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.91 0.90 0.98 5.59 560.48Packet Page 436 of 839Attachment 20 Page 28 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*165 0156-102-060 2313 SILK CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 0.80 0.98 5.26 527.95166 0156-102-070 2312 SILK CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 0.90 0.98 5.45 546.84167 0156-102-080 2306 SILK CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.18 1.10 0.98 6.55 656.47168 0156-102-090 2521 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.69 0.72 0.98 4.79 479.94169 0156-102-100 2515 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.67 0.98 4.57 458.45170 0156-102-110 2509 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.85 0.90 0.98 5.46 547.26171 0156-102-120 No Benefit - - - - - 172 0156-102-130 2403 TEA CT Single-Family Residential2.00 0.71 1.15 0.98 5.70 571.50173 0156-102-140 2409 TEA CT Single-Family Residential2.00 0.83 1.02 0.98 5.67 568.76174 0156-102-150 2415 TEA CT Single-Family Residential2.00 0.83 0.92 0.98 5.46 547.83175 0156-102-170 2408 TEA CT Single-Family Residential2.00 0.90 1.15 0.98 6.08 609.38176 0156-102-180 2491 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.72 1.02 0.98 5.44 545.95177 0156-102-190 2485 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.58 0.82 0.98 6.77 679.03178 0156-102-200 2401 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.08 0.82 0.98 5.77 578.69179 0156-102-210 2407 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 1.15 0.98 5.49 550.74180 0156-102-220 2413 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.61 0.92 0.98 5.02 503.82181 0156-102-230 2419 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.75 1.02 0.98 5.50 551.57182 0156-102-240 2425 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.78 1.09 0.98 5.72 573.40183 0156-102-250 2431 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.88 1.02 0.98 5.77 578.89184 0156-102-260 2432 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.79 0.92 0.98 5.38 539.67185 0156-102-310 2455 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 1.02 0.98 5.26 527.40186 0156-102-320 2449 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 1.15 0.98 5.54 555.75187 0156-102-330 2443 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.82 0.92 0.98 5.44 545.60188 0156-102-380 2414 TEA CT Single-Family Residential2.00 0.84 0.82 0.98 5.29 531.08189 0156-102-390 2420 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.88 1.15 0.98 6.04 606.13190 0156-102-400 2414 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.99 0.82 0.98 5.59 560.49191 0156-102-410 2408 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.17 0.82 0.98 5.96 598.18192 0156-102-420 2437 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.86 1.15 0.98 6.00 601.78193 0156-102-430 2431 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.80 1.15 0.98 5.88 589.70194 0156-102-440 2425 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.15 0.98 5.89 590.38195 0156-102-450 2419 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.01 1.09 0.98 6.15 617.01196 0156-102-460 2426 ROYAL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.41 0.82 0.98 6.44 645.95197 0156-111-020 2348 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.78 1.43 0.98 6.39 640.72198 0156-112-020 2360 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.67 1.34 0.98 6.00 601.35199 0156-112-030 2366 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 1.02 0.98 5.18 519.41200 0156-112-040 2372 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.56 0.92 0.98 4.92 493.21201 0156-112-050 2378 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.55 1.15 0.98 5.38 539.78202 0156-112-060 2384 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.55 0.92 0.98 4.90 491.00203 0156-112-070 2390 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.54 1.02 0.98 5.09 510.08204 0156-112-080 2354 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.83 1.15 0.98 5.94 595.79205 0156-113-080 2429 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.88 0.82 0.98 5.64 565.53Packet Page 437 of 839Attachment 20 Page 29 of 32

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site Address Land Use ClassificationTotal Land Use BP Lot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BP FY 2023/24 Rates*206 0156-113-110 2441 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.63 0.98 6.86 687.78207 0156-113-120 2445 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.15 0.98 5.89 590.43208 0156-113-130 2448 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.27 0.82 0.98 6.16 618.19209 0156-113-140 2444 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.41 0.92 0.98 6.63 665.03210 0156-113-150 2440 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.02 0.98 5.62 563.42211 0156-113-160 2436 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.78 0.92 0.98 5.35 536.99212 0156-113-170 2432 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 1.15 0.98 6.12 613.93213 0156-113-180 2428 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 1.02 0.98 5.83 585.15214 0156-113-190 2424 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 0.92 0.98 5.62 564.02215 0156-113-200 2420 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 1.71 0.98 7.30 732.33216 0156-113-210 2416 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 0.94 0.98 5.69 570.25217 0156-113-220 2412 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.80 1.02 0.98 5.61 562.48218 0156-113-230 2408 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.06 0.82 0.98 5.74 575.35219 0156-113-240 2365 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.72 1.02 0.98 5.43 544.99220 0156-113-250 2359 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.95 1.15 0.98 6.18 619.72221 0156-113-260 2353 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.08 1.15 0.98 6.44 645.77222 0156-113-270 2401 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 0.92 0.98 5.42 543.74223 0156-113-280 2405 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 0.82 0.98 4.98 499.22224 0156-113-290 2409 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.66 1.15 0.98 5.60 562.14225 0156-113-300 2413 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.58 0.92 0.98 4.97 498.03226 0156-113-310 2417 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.55 1.02 0.98 5.10 511.89227 0156-113-320 2421 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.55 0.92 0.98 4.90 491.71228 0156-113-330 2425 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.64 1.15 0.98 5.56 557.18229 0156-113-340 2429 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 1.15 0.98 5.95 596.61230 0156-113-350 2433 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.02 0.98 5.62 563.31231 0156-113-360 2428 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.15 0.98 5.89 590.78232 0156-113-370 2424 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.81 1.15 0.98 5.89 590.64233 0156-113-380 2420 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 1.02 0.98 5.26 527.57234 0156-113-390 2416 TOP GALLANT CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.87 0.92 0.98 5.54 555.90235 0156-113-400 2347 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.84 0.82 0.98 5.29 530.61236 0156-113-410 2341 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.60 1.02 0.98 5.21 522.37237 0156-113-420 2335 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.63 0.92 0.98 5.07 508.45238 0156-113-430 2329 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.68 1.02 0.98 5.36 537.23239 0156-113-440 2323 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.88 0.92 0.98 5.57 558.53240 0156-113-450 2317 VISTA GRANDE Single-Family Residential 2.00 1.42 0.82 0.98 6.45 647.22241 0156-113-460 2401 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.97 1.02 0.98 5.95 596.62242 0156-113-470 2405 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.59 0.92 0.98 4.99 500.08243 0156-113-480 2409 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.00 0.58 1.02 0.98 5.17 518.63244 0156-113-490 2413 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.85 0.82 0.98 5.59 560.55245 0156-113-500 2417 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.84 1.15 0.98 6.25 627.35246 0156-113-510 2421 MAINSAIL CT Single-Family Residential 2.10 0.78 1.02 0.98 5.84 585.74Packet Page 438 of 839Attachment 20 Page 30 of 32

City of Fairfield
Amended Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2023-3 (Waterman Highlands) 22

Coder, Kim D. “Identified Benefits of Community Trees and Forests.” University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service - Forest Resources Publication, October 1996.

Van Dillen, Sonja et. al, “Greenspace in urban neighborhoods and residents’ health: Adding quality to quantity”, 2012.

Crompton, John L. "Parks and Economic Development." American Planning Association, p. 31-48, 2001.

Department of Parks and Recreation, California (DPR). "The Health and Social Benefits of Recreation." Sacramento, CA: California State Parks, March 2005.

Town of Tiburon v. Bonander, 180 Cal. App. 4th 1057, 1084 (2009) "Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition." Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2022.

Packet Page 440 of 839Attachment 20 Page 32 of 32

nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516

Engineer’s Report For:

City of Fairfield Landscaping and
Lighting Maintenance District No.
2023-5 (Rancho Solano)
March 2023

Packet Page 441 of 839Attachment 21 Page 1 of 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5

1.1 District History ........................................................................................................... 5

1.2 Legislative Context .................................................................................................... 5

1.3 Court Rulings ............................................................................................................. 6

2. IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................. 8

2.1 Street Lighting ........................................................................................................... 9

2.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ......................................................................... 9

3. BENEFITS ...................................................................................................................... 10

3.1 Street Lighting ......................................................................................................... 10

3.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping ....................................................................... 11

4. SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................... 12

4.1 Parcel Characteristics .............................................................................................. 12

4.2 Land Use .................................................................................................................. 13

4.3 Total Special Benefit Points ..................................................................................... 17

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL BENEFITS ......................................... 18

5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................. 18

5.2 General Benefit Analysis ......................................................................................... 18

6. BUDGET ........................................................................................................................ 22

6.1 Maximum Amount to Be Assessed ......................................................................... 23

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics ................................................................ 24

6.5 Data for Annual Assessment Calculations ............................................................... 24

6.6 Appeals .................................................................................................................... 24

6.7 Method of Collection .............................................................................................. 25

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT .............................................................................................. 26

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ................................................................................................ 27

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL ........................................................................................................ 28

10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 29 Packet Page 442 of 839Attachment 21 Page 2 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 5

1. INTRODUCTION

The City currently has an existing assessment district which funds various services and improvements including lighting, landscaping, and the associated maintenance, operation, and servicing within the boundary of Maintenance District No. 5 – Smith Ranch. As the existing assessment district does not provide sufficient revenue for the services and improvements, the City proposes to form a new assessment district that is intended to provide sufficient revenue to fund ongoing annual associated maintenance, operation, and servicing of the landscaping and lighting improvements; reserve funds for replacement and repair of the improvements; and an allowance for an annual inflator so the assessment rate may be increased over time as costs increase without conducting a new Article XIII D balloting proceeding. The proposed assessment district is the City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) (“District”).

Article XIII D imposes five basic substantive requirements on assessments:

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 6 (5) Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.

1.3.1 GENERAL BENEFIT
Article XIII D requires an agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on the identified parcels because only special benefits are assessable.

The Court of Appeal in Golden Hills Neighborhood Assn., Inc. v. City of San Diego (2011) (“Golden Hills”) clarified this concept by stating, “Separation and quantification of general and special benefits must be accomplished by apportioning the cost of a service or improvement between the two and assessing property owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits .” The Court of Appeal in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010) (“Beutz”) noted that the trial court took judicial notice of the Legislative Analyst’s Office pamphlet titled “Understanding Proposition 218” which states an agency must, “estimate the amount of special benefit landowners would receive from the project or service, as well as the amount of ‘general benefit.’ This step is needed because Proposition 218 allows local government to recoup from assessments only the proportionate share of cost to provide the special benefit.”
The Court in Beutz furthered this idea stating, “Separating the general from the special benefits of a public improvement project and estimating the quantity of each in relation to the other is essential if an assessment is to be limited to the special benefits.”
The Court of Appeal again reiterated the need to separate, quantify and apportion costs to general benefits from the improvements in Broad Beach Geologic Hazard Abatement District v 31506 Victoria Point LLC (2022), stating, “The District cites no authority, and we are aware of none, suggesting that an agency’s subjective intent determines the need to account for general benefits.”

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 7 The assessment on a particular property cannot be based on the relative cost of the improvements to the property, but rather on the special benefit conferred on such property. The Court in Tiburon also stated, “an assessment represents the entirety of the cost of the improvement or property-related service, less any amount attributable to general benefits (which may not be assessed), allocated to individual properties in proportion to the relative special benefit conferred on the property.”

Packet Page 445 of 839Attachment 21 Page 5 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 8

For illustration purposes only, not an official map.

Packet Page 446 of 839Attachment 21 Page 6 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 9

2.1 Street Lighting
The Improvements include the maintenance, operation, and servicing of street lighting, including theme light poles, ornamental lighting and other appurtenant facilities in the public right of way areas throughout the boundary of the District, as identified in the above illustrative map. The Improvements are generally described as: maintenance, operation, and servicing of public street lighting facilities, including all works or improvements used or useful for the lighting of any public places, including ornamental standards, luminaires, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances. Maintenance, operation, and servicing includes, but is not limited to, personnel, furnishing utilities, electrical energy and timing/switching, lamp changing, emergency services, pole painting, fixture cleaning, glassware replacement, and rehabilitation, which includes modernization and replacement of systems; repairs, including poles, conduit, wiring and fusing, and fixtures repair and replacement, contracting services and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. Currently, there are 46 total street lights within the District and the general location of the Improvements within the District is shown in the illustration above.

There is approximately 3,000,931 square feet of landscape maintenance area and 2,268 street trees within the District. The general location of the Improvements within the District is described as follows:

1. All landscaping fronting the District and in the median island on Mankas Corner Road from Oliver Road to approximately 500 feet west of Rancho Solano Parkway.

2. All landscaping in the median islands and in the parkway strips between the curb and public right- of-way along Rancho Solano Parkway.

3. Landscaping in the median islands, in parkway strips and on slopes on various interior streets behind the gates along Rancho Solano Parkway.

4. All lands owned by the City of Fairfield designated as open space, including fire breaks.

5. All other improvements necessary to maintain and service the above-described facilities within the District.

Maintenance, operation and servicing activities for the following locations are not included in the cost estimate or in the following benefit analysis:

1. The Rancho Solano Golf Course.

Packet Page 447 of 839Attachment 21 Page 7 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 10

3. BENEFITS
The Improvements will confer special benefits upon certain parcels within the District. These benefits are summarized in the table below:

Improvement Benefit(s)
Street Lighting Improved Safety
Improved Accessibility
Street Trees and Other Landscaping Improved Aesthetics
Increased Livability
The special benefits to be conferred by the Improvements are detailed below.

3.1 Street Lighting

3.1.1 IMPROVED SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY
The street lighting Improvements will confer safety benefits to assessable parcels in close proximity to lighting. This benefit extends to property, as adequate lighting should decrease vandalism and other property-related crime. As noted in one report, “Published studies having different methodologies tend to converge on an overall average reported 20% to 30% reduction in nighttime crash risk from lighting ” (National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, 2009). The same report also states, “… lighting has a positive effect on reducing crime ...” The Improvements will also provide improved safety benefits by facilitating a more efficient and safer flow of traffic to and from properties within the District between the dusk and dawn hours. It is a well-accepted fact that pedestrian and traffic safety is considerably reduced in the hours of darkness between dusk and dawn. Various studies have concluded that good quality street lighting reduces the accident rate by increasing the overall visibility, as vehicle headlights are inadequate for high-speed traffic. For example, “Driving outside of daylight hours is more dangerous – only a quarter of all travel by car drivers is between the hours of 7pm and 8am, yet this period accounts for 40% of fatal and serious injuries in the same group.” (Night-time accidents: a scoping study, UCL, London, 2009). Additionally, “… installing road lighting in a previously unlit road led to a rate ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.69), which implies a 55% reduction in crashes compared to that in the control area.” (Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009) Therefore, the street lighting Improvements will confer safety benefits to property within the District and each assessable property will be assessed for its proportional special benefit.

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 11 lighting will improve emergency response efficiency in the District. Therefore, the street lighting Improvements will confer accessibility benefits.

3.2 Street Trees and Other Landscaping

3.2.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS AND LIVABILITY
The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, operation, and servicing of the street trees and other landscaping within the District.

Packet Page 449 of 839Attachment 21 Page 9 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 12

4.1.1 BUILDING FACTOR
The average building size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 2,983.52 square feet. Each assessable parcel’s actual building size was divided by the District’s average building size to determine a Building Factor.

Parcel's Building
Square Feet / District's Average
Building Square Feet = Parcel's
Building Factor

4.1.2 LOT FACTOR
The average lot size for all assessable parcels within the District is approximately 18,264.12 square feet.

Each assessable parcel’s actual lot square footage was divided by the District’s average lot square footage to determine a Lot Factor.

Parcel's Lot
Square Feet / District's Average
Lot Square Feet = Parcel's
Lot Factor

4.1.3 ADT FACTOR
The average daily trip (ADT) count for all assessable parcels within the District is 12.48 trips. Each assessable parcel’s ADT was divided by the District’s ADT to determine the parcel’s ADT factor.

Parcel's
Trips / District's Average Trips =Parcel's
ADT Factor
Packet Page 450 of 839Attachment 21 Page 10 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 13 Assessable parcels were assigned trip generation rates by land use classification in accordance with the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11 th Edition). Per the ITE Trip Generation User’s Guide, a “Trip” is defined as a “single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination (exiting and entering) inside a study site. For trip generation purposes, the total number of trips for a land use over a given period of time are the total of all trips entering plus all trips exiting a site during a designated time period.”
The ADT rates used in this analysis are shown in the table below. ADT rates came from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), unless otherwise noted. For land uses with multiple ITE Codes, an average trip value was used for the ADT rate. Only those land use classifications currently being assessed at the time of preparation of this report are included below. Any future changes to a parcel’s land use classification resulting in changes to the parcel’s ADT rates will be based on the values found in the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

Land Use Classification
Institute of Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE) Value(s)
Average Daily
Trip (ADT)
Rate
ADT
Rate Per
Single Family Residential 210-SFR Detached Housing 9.43 Dwelling unit Single Family Residential 215-SFR Attached Housing 7.20 Dwelling unit Assisted Living 252-Senior Adult Housing 3.24 Dwelling unit Public 435-Golf Course 3.74 Acre
520-Elementary School 2.27 Student
Clubhouse/Recreation 490-Tennis Courts 30.32 Tennis Court Commercial 565-Day Care Center 4.09 Student
Clubhouse/Recreation 710, 975-Blended rate 11.10 1,000 bldg. sq. ft.

Undeveloped N/A N/A N/A

Assisted Living Property consists of parcels used for residential care, providing assistance with activities and daily living and social care.

Clubhouse/Recreation Property consists of parcels utilized for club houses, locker rooms, maintenance facilities, prop shops, tennis courts, swimming pools, restaurants or banquet facilities.

Packet Page 451 of 839Attachment 21 Page 11 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 14 Multi-Family Residential Property consists of parcels that are duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and condominiums used exclusively for residential purposes.

Park Property consists of certain park parcels that are not being maintained by the District or included as part of the District Improvements.

Public Property consists of parcels used for public purposes including, golf courses, police and fire stations, public schools, libraries and other government administration buildings.

Single Family Residential Property consists of parcels that have stand-alone residential dwelling units with their own lots intended for one family.

Undeveloped Property consists of parcels with no structure value.

There are currently a total of 1,218 assessable parcels within the District. Additionally, there are 127 parcels in the District deemed to receive no benefit from the Improvements and are therefore non- assessable. These parcels include, but are not limited to: conservation easements, restricted use parcels, streets, right of ways, and parcels which are the Improvements themselves. Typical Solano County use codes include, but are not limited to 6100, 6400, 6462, 6463, 6464, 9100, 9600, and 9700.

0.25 for Safety and Accessibility. All other land use classifications will be assigned 1 Safety and Accessibility Benefit Point.

Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT factor are used to measure Safety and Accessibility Packet Page 452 of 839Attachment 21 Page 12 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 15 Benefits. The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.2 APPORTIONING AESTHETIC BENEFIT
The Aesthetic Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. The benefit of visual appeal is not restricted to a particular land use. A more attractive public environment specially benefits all parcels irrespective of land use classification. Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Aesthetic Benefit Point. However, Undeveloped land use classifications will be assigned 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Point due to the nature of the land use. Per the definition in Section 3.2.1, “the street trees and other landscaping are believed to create a more beautiful, aesthetically pleasing environment within the District and they enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District.” As such, there is some aesthetic benefit conferred by the Improvements on undeveloped land use classifications. However, this benefit is limited, as undeveloped parcels are not utilized as areas recognized in the definition of aesthetic benefit of social interactions, areas where residents are likely to walk, areas of stimulated economic activity or locations that will attract residents and/or visitors to the community. Therefore, the undeveloped land use classifications are assigned the reduced 0.25 Aesthetic Benefit Points due to the nature of the land use compared to the developed land use classifications . The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

Additionally, all land use classifications located in proximity to interior landscaping will experience a greater level of aesthetic benefits compared to other land use classifications. To account for this added benefit, Undeveloped parcels designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.10 benefit points for Aesthetic and all other land uses designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.20 benefit points for Aesthetic. For example, Single Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) land uses are assigned a benefit point of 1.2 and Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 0.35 for Aesthetic. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.3 APPORTIONING LIVABILITY BENEFIT
The Livability Benefits conferred by the Improvements will specially benefit all assessable land use classifications. Livability represents the desirability to reside in an area based on the characteristics of the environment that make an area a more attractive place to live. Accordingly, each assessable land use classification will be assigned one Livability Benefit Point. However, undeveloped land use classification will be assigned 0.25 Livability Benefit Point due to the nature of the land use. Per the definition in Section Packet Page 453 of 839Attachment 21 Page 13 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 16

Additionally, all land use classifications located in proximity to interior landscaping will experience a greater level of livability benefits compared to other land use classifications. To account for this added benefit, Undeveloped parcels designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.10 benefit points for Livability and all other land uses designated with the Interior Landscaping land use classification are assigned an additional 0.20 benefit points for Livability. For example, Single Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) land uses are assigned a benefit point of 1.2 and Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) land use classifications are assigned a benefit point of 0.35 for Livability. The table provided in Section 4.2.4 of this Report provides a summary of the land use benefit points assigned to the assessable land use classifications within the District.

After the land use benefit points have been assigned by land use classifications within the District, improved livability from tree and landscaping Improvements, as a property related benefit, can be measured by the characteristics of a parcel, namely the size of a building, its size, and trip generation.

Parcels with larger building and lot sizes and parcels with greater intensity of use, measured by trip generation, will experience the Livability Benefits to a greater degree than smaller, less-developed parcels.

Therefore, the Lot Factor, Building Factor and ADT Factor are used to measure Livability Benefits. The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel is detailed in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.2.4 LAND USE BENEFIT POINTS
The tables below summarize the Land Use Benefit Points assigned to the various assessable land use classifications within the District:

Street Lighting
Land Use Classification Per Safety Accessibility
Total Street
Lighting Land Use
Benefit Points
Single Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Assisted Living Parcel 1 1 2
Commercial Parcel 1 1 2
Clubhouse/Recreation Parcel 1 1 2
Park Parcel 0.50 0.50 1
Public Parcel 0.50 0.50 1
Undeveloped Parcel 0.25 0.25 0.50

Packet Page 454 of 839Attachment 21 Page 14 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 17

Street Trees and Other
Landscaping

Land Use Classification Per Aesthetic Livability
Total Landscaping
Land Use Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Single Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1 1 2
Multi-Family Residential (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4 Assisted Living Parcel 1 1 2
Assisted Living (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4 Commercial Parcel 1 1 2
Commercial (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4
Clubhouse/Recreation Parcel 1 1 2
Clubhouse/Recreation (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4 Park Parcel 1 1 2
Park (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4
Public Parcel 1 1 2
Public (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 1.2 1.2 2.4
Undeveloped Parcel 0.25 0.25 0.50
Undeveloped (Interior Landscaping) Parcel 0.35 0.35 0.70

4.3 Total Special Benefit Points
The calculation of Total Special Benefit Points for each parcel takes into account each component analyzed and described above, parcel characteristics and land use classification. The formula for determining each parcel’s Total Benefit Points is as follows:
( Building
Factor + Lot
Factor + ADT
Factor ) x Street Lighting
Land Use Benefit
Points
= Total Street
Lighting Special
Benefit Points
( Building
Factor + Lot
Factor + ADT
Factor ) x Landscaping Land
Use Benefit
Points
=
Total
Landscaping
Special
Benefit Points

The Total Special Benefit Points by Improvement type are computed for each parcel in the District and summed. The Total District Special Benefit Points are 14,151.87. These Total District Special Benefit Points are used to determine the proposed assessment amounts on each parcel.

Packet Page 455 of 839Attachment 21 Page 15 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 18

5. SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL

5.1 Summary
As detailed below, it is estimated the Improvements will confer an Overall General Benefit of 31.85%.

5.2 General Benefit Analysis

Land Use Classification
Institute of
Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE) Value(s)
Average
Daily
Trip Rate Rate Per
Total
Parcels/
Units
Estimated Daily
District Vehicle
Trips
Single Family Residential 210-SFR Detached
Housing 9.43 Dwelling Unit 1,105 10,420.15
Multi-Family Residential 215-SFR Attached
Housing 7.20 Dwelling Unit 93 669.60
Assisted Living 252- Senior Adult
Housing 3.24 Dwelling Unit 172 (1) 557.28
Public 430-Golf Course 3.74 Acre 4 698.93
Clubhouse/Recreation 490-Tennis Courts 30.32 Tennis Court 1 272.88 Public 520-Elementary School 2.27 Student 3 1,977.17
Commercial 565 – Day Care Center 4.09 Student 1 319.02
Packet Page 456 of 839Attachment 21 Page 16 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 19 Land Use Classification
Institute of
Transportation
Engineer’s (ITE) Value(s)
Average
Daily
Trip Rate Rate Per
Total
Parcels/
Units
Estimated Daily
District Vehicle
Trips
Clubhouse/Recreation 710, 975-Blended rate 11.10 1,000 sq. ft.

GFA 2 153.39
Undeveloped N/A N/A N/A 8 0.00
Total: 15,068.42
(1) Calculated based upon total units, represents 1 parcel.

Roadway design capacity is a critical element that affects trip distribution and was utilized in this analysis to estimate the number of daily vehicle trips passing through the District. From a visual inspection of the District, the primary higher functional classification roadways serving the District parcels are Mankas Corner Road and Rancho Solano Parkway. Roadway design capacities, as defined in the City of Fairfield’s Travel Demand Forecasting Model, were estimated based on the functional classification of the roadway, the number of lanes, and the City’s minimum recommended Level of Service “C” (City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook 2020). Roadway design capacity was calculated for the higher functional classification roadways (henceforth referred to as the “Major Roads”) identified above in order to estimate the total daily traffic flow through the District.

Using the methodology described above, the estimated pass-through vehicular traffic through the District is 79.07% as summarized in the table below:

Average Vehicle
Trips Through
District
Estimated District
Generated Vehicle
Trips
Estimated Pass
Through Vehicle
Traffic
Pass Through
%
72,000 (1) - 15,068.42 = 56,931.58 79.07%
(1) Equals the design capacity of each roadway, reduced by 25% to recognize the City’s recommended “C” Level of Service. Breakdown by street name below.

The table below separates the weighted vehicular pass-through percentage factors by street name for the Major Roads traversing the District.

Street Name
Vehicle Trips
Passing-Through
District
% of Total
Roadway Design
Capacity (1)
Weighted Vehicle
Pass-Through %
Factor (2)
Mankas Corner Road 50,400 70.00% 55.35%
Rancho Solano Parkway 21,600 30.00% 23.72%
Total: 72,000 100% 79.07%
(1) Equals (Vehicle Trips Passing Through District on Roadway / Total Vehicle Trips Passing Through District). (2) Equals (% of Total Roadway Design Capacity x Pass Through %).

Additionally, there are bike lanes present on Mankas Corner Road, which provides added roadway capacity in the form of additional lanes in the roadway cross-section designated exclusively for the use of bicycles.

The Federal Highway Administration’s Technical Report entitled “Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities” was utilized to estimate the additional roadway capacity provided by the bike lanes based on the type of facility (namely on-street bicycle facilities), the number of lanes, and the City’s minimum recommended Level of Service “C” (City of Fairfield Design, Construction and Materials Specification Handbook 2020). An estimated pass-through bicycle traffic percentage of 79.07% was utilized, consistent with the estimated pass-through vehicular traffic percentage through the District calculated above.

Packet Page 457 of 839Attachment 21 Page 17 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 20 However, simply estimating the number of pass-through vehicle and bicycle trips does not necessarily indicate the level of benefit accruing to vehicles passing through the District. We must look at each of the Improvements individually.

5.2.2 GENERAL BENEFIT: STREET LIGHTING
The street lights to be funded by the assessment are on the Major Roads identified in Section 5.2.1.

The street lighting Improvements are located along Mankas Corner Road and Rancho Solano Parkway within the District. The trips generated by the property within the District was taken as a percent of the total traffic on the Major Roads.

Additionally, there are bike lanes on Mankas Corner Road, and this is recognized as contributing additional general benefit to the street lighting Improvements.

As summarized in the table below, the Effective General Benefit percentage from the Street Lighting Improvements is 26.08%.

Roadways with Street Lights
Number of
Street Lights
% of
Streetlights
Weighted Vehicle
Pass-Through %
Factor
Effective
General
Benefit % (1)
Rancho Solano Parkway 43 93.48% 23.72% 22.17%
Mankas Corner Road 3 6.52% 55.35% 3.61%
Mankas Corner Road – Bike Lanes 0.29% (2)
Total: 46 26.08% (3)
(1) Equals (% of Streetlights x Pass-Through Percentage). (2) Equals (Capacity per lane per hour [60] x number of bike lanes [2] x 24 hours) / (Design Capacity for Mankas Corner [50,400] x Pass Through Percentage [79.07%] x 6.52%).
(3) Does not add due to rounding.

5.2.3 GENERAL BENEFIT: STREET TREES AND OTHER LANDSCAPING Certain street trees and other landscaping to be funded by the assessment are on the Major Roads as described previously. Accordingly, some of the aesthetic and livability benefits will be conferred to traffic passing through the District. An analysis of the street trees and landscaping areas within the District was conducted and whenever street trees and landscaping areas were located within close proximity to the Major Roads, those trees were considered as belonging to the Major Roads.

The landscaping Improvements are located throughout the District. Additionally, there are bike lanes on Mankas Corner Road, and this is recognized as contributing additional general benefit to the Landscaping Improvements. As summarized in the table below, the Effective General Benefit percentage from the Landscaping Improvements is 5.78%.

Packet Page 458 of 839Attachment 21 Page 18 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 21 Roadways with Landscaping
Improvements
Feet of Roadway
with
Landscaping
Improvements
% of Total
Landscaping
Improvements (1)
Weighted
Vehicle Pass-
Through %
Factor
Effective
General
Benefit % (2)
Rancho Solano Parkway 10,803 15.82% 23.72% 3.75%
Mankas Corner Road 2,306 3.38% 55.35% 1.87%
Mankas Corner Road – Bike Lanes 0.15% (3)
Interior Streets 55,171 80.80% 0.00% 0.00%
Total: 68,280 5.78% (4)
(1) Equals (Feet of Roadway with Landscaping Improvements / 68,280). (2) Equals (% of Total Landscaping Improvements x Weighted Vehicle Pass-Through % Factor). (3) Equals (Capacity per lane per hour [60] x number of bike lanes [2] x 24 hours) / (Design Capacity for Mankas Corner [50,400] x Pass Through Percentage [79.07%] x 3.38%).
(4) Does not add due to rounding.

General Benefit Category
General
Benefit %
Street Lights 26.08%
Street Trees and Other Landscaping 5.78%
Overall General Benefit: 31.85% (1)
(1) Does not add due to rounding.

Packet Page 459 of 839Attachment 21 Page 19 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 22

6. BUDGET
The following table summarizes the estimated annual costs to fund the Improvements for Fiscal Year 2023/24:

Description Amount
Landscaping and Street Trees
Landscape Maintenance $550,233
Tree Maintenance 132,300
Weed Abatement 10,000
Irrigation 155,250
Irrigation Parts and Repairs 100,047
Contingency (5%) 44,888
Reserves (5%) 44,888
Subtotal Landscaping: $1,037,606
Street Lighting
Street Light Maintenance 1,150
Electricity 5,520
Contingency (5%) 316
Reserves (5%) 316
Subtotal Street Lighting: $7,302
Administration
City Staff Costs $93,083
County Fees 10,839
Engineer/Consultant Costs 8,000
Subtotal Administration 111,922

Total Cost of Improvements $1,156,830

Description
Landscaping &
Lighting Budget
% of
Budget
Special
Benefit
Admin
Budget (3) Total
Special
Benefit
Points
(SBP)
Rate per
SBP
Lighting Budget $7,302 0.70% $5,398 (1) $783 $6,181 6,653 $0.9290 Landscaping Budget 1,037,606 99.30% 977,632 (2) 111,139 1,088,771 7,499 145.1943 Total $1,044,908 $983,030 $111,922 $1,094,952 14,152
(1) Equals (Lighting Budget x (1 – 26.08%)).
(2) Equals (Landscaping Budget x (1 - 5.78%)).

Packet Page 460 of 839Attachment 21 Page 20 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 23 (3) Includes $10,839 for County fees, $8,000 for Engineering/Consultant cost and $93,083 for City staff costs. Equals (Total Admin Budget x % of Budget).

The calculation of the balance to be assessed is shown below:

Description Amount
Total Cost of Improvements $1,156,830
Less General Benefit Portion (Lighting – 26.08%) (1,904) Less General Benefit Portion (Landscaping – 5.78%) (59,974) Total Cost of Improvements to Be Assessed $1,094,952 (1) (1) The Total Cost of Improvements to be Assessed does not add due to rounding. The final assessment rates in Section 9 have been truncated to two decimal places.

Total Street Lighting Costs to be Assessed / Total Street Lighting Special Benefit Points = ($6,181.10) (6,653.15)

Assessment Rate per Street Lighting Special Benefit Point ($0.9290)
Total Landscaping Costs to be Assessed / Total Landscaping Special Benefit Points = ($1,088,771.33) (7,498.72)

Assessment Rate per Landscaping Special Benefit Point
($145.1943)
The Maximum Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point for each Improvement Type is then multiplied by each parcel’s total special benefit points to determine the maximum assessment amount per parcel.

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 24 annual assessment rate per special benefit point will not be recalculated. The maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point, plus the annual cost of living inflator, will remain fixed. The actual annual assessment rate per special benefit point will be calculated by dividing the fiscal year’s total cost of improvements to be assessed by the total special benefit points, not to exceed the maximum allowable annual assessment rate per special benefit point for that fiscal year. The maximum allowable assessment rate per special benefit point is escalated each year on July 1 by the annual change in the February to February Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward CA region, not to exceed 3% annually, beginning July 1, 2024.

6.4 Future Changes to Parcel Characteristics
Future changes to any of the parcel characteristics detailed in Section 4 will cause possible changes in the total assessment revenue. The assessment revenue for any given year will be the product of the District’s parcel characteristics, special benefit points and the budget in effect for such fiscal year. Development within the District that increases the overall building square footage, for example, will lead to possible increased assessment revenue, even if the assessment rate per special benefit point is not increased. By way of example, when a previously undeveloped parcel develops into a single family residential land use classification, the parcel will no longer be assessed as an undeveloped land use, but rather as a single family residential parcel with the updated parcel characteristics.

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 25 payment of all assessments when filing the request for review and must remain current during the review process.

In any dispute over parcel characteristic data used to compute assessments, the City Manager (or his/her designee) shall make a conclusive determination and its decision shall be final.

Packet Page 463 of 839Attachment 21 Page 23 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 26

7. ENGINEER’S STATEMENT
The City of Fairfield Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) assessments described in this Report have been prepared pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution. In preparing these assessments:

By:

John G. Egan
Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. 14853

b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel by the Improvements; and
Packet Page 464 of 839Attachment 21 Page 24 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 27

8. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages contain the assessment diagram for the District.

Packet Page 465 of 839Attachment 21 Page 25 of 67

Source: Solano County GIS
Geographic Coordinate Reference: GCS North American 1983 Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane California II FIPS 0402 Feet Sheet 1 of 7

C I T Y O F FA I R F I E L D

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COUNTY OF SOLANO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THIS _____ DAY OF __________, 202__.
___________________________________________

CITY CLERK

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS DIAGRAM SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE SOLANO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS FOR THOSE PARCELS LISTED.

C
o
r
n
e
r

R
d
Clayt
o
n
R
d
Abernathy RdRancho Solano PkwyPennsylvania AvLedgewood Rd80 80 LLMD 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) Boundary
LLMD 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) Parcels
Parcels 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
O
Air Base Pkwy
Walters RdLLMD 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) Boundary
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
O
Packet Page 466 of 839Attachment 21 Page 26 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COUNTY OF SOLANO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sheet 2 of 7
Germa
n
St
Rancho Solano PkwyPebble
B
e
a
c
h
Ci
r
Spyglass Ct
Holesapple Rd
Pebble Beach CtSe
m
i
n
o
l
e

D
r
Quail Hollo
w

D
r
Gan
t
o
n

C
t
8 1
7 4
261
12 264
1039
3 262
1080
440
1153
1217
1082
1061
890
4 2
4 1154
1190
92 1
7611081
8711040
10411083
4 8
4 1188
798802
888
478799801113511
2 9
1253 11348198128001252481119712
5 4 11251133115212074831279
47711401146113680311514794761278
1150
4801
1 1
5 1224106512699291132
8 2
0 1124
1064
11161138
1202 113011471
2 5
5 11681
2 4
2 113112011117
10771171482113711671
2 2
1 1174930
10791203
122711721248124712301195118
9 1
0 5
4 1057
1078
1240124111761149
1173114510561178
1 0
5 21169 107511911175105911991226
1229122511771256120811701143
107612181060112012491141
1142
10731062116311601166
12381068107010741246119811591161123910718741069115811871206120010551 0 5
3 1067122812231144
122211658981162115611551185
1148
1180
10581157
1277 1213896
1232 112111921
2 0
9 121110661243123711221
0 5
012311183
928
1270
1182
1 0
4 91251 1
0 5
112361
2 1
0 927
106311641184
1 2
4 5 8931271
883
1 1
7 91214 10721205
123512679001204
1 2
1 5
1118
10 4
8 11238841193112612501
2 1
6 11278971128
1 2
1 9 907118112121
2 6
8 1234892939
894933
895926
1 2
4 4
1186
9169081258931
8809011
2 6
4 1
2 3
3 12599249231257925912
47589112619139029038788778791262919934126088512659409228879188758761 1 9
4 1263899935
9 1
0 1272 917936
909932
797882
8869
1 1
914
951904
906
920
905
942
941
818
872
937
1047
889
938
881
943
873
915
1196
1220
1266
1139
1119
Millbrook CtPacket Page 467 of 839Attachment 21 Page 27 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELDLANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
6 12
7 9
440
262
301
264
4 2
4 8
1280
261
5 835
1039
7 6
1 425
285
1061
302457
1275
272 83426312694
9 4
1040
274860
1041
273 859
4 8
4 271 848265 8
5 8 844382349
284 350798802
444478799861275801
2872794
1 2
458
383
278286280 817266
294
4 2 6
268 2818
1 9
4 8
7 1253
814849824267 8138128218158001217
3008231252
8184818162
7 0 4494548087964558 0 3
4 8
5 809289 811466
1254
450793468 8254692 8 8
3848228104434524837971279
4 4
6 447 794493323439276293477804820
453805451806807402
282795269 2964564 702774794414764714
8 6
1278
2928272914804
8 84
8 9
467472
2972994
4 5 3244424732954744751 2 8 2 437290 42713274824604654314292984384344354633814644334591054 283 4914904614621 0 5 6
4361052
432492428430834
1 2 8 71281 10461044105510
53 1230
13091 2 7 7
1283127610431 2 3 2
10501231
1048
1 2 7 0
1049
1051
10421 2 7 3 10458
4 7
10 47
1 2 7 1
1 2 7 2
134013391 2 8 5
13371342133813361 2 7 4
4481255
13021308133512841341128813341345134313111 2 8 6
13291332131013031314129413131333131512961 3 4 4
131212931328129213181291133113001317133013261323129013041295129810081319132012971316132112991322130512891324130713061325862857 1301Pebble Beach Ci
r
S
e
mi
n
o
l
e

D
r
St
AndrewsRdOlympicRd
W ailea C irK
aanapaliDr
FormbyLnRancho Solano PkwyAscot DrPebbleBeachCtBirkhamCtKa p
alua
Ct
Congressional Cir
S e m i n o l e C i r
PebbleBeachCir
Sheet 3 of 7
Packet Page 468 of 839Attachment 21 Page 28 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELDLANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
6 10
9 502
496
1030
12 12813
498
212
301
495
835
1031
504
501
129
499
1038
1037
103
1035
497
870
1036
211
141180371033
5 1032
1034
272
285445930 5817018547
43220
271
8 6 0
867541273221 530222301274
20269531859857
608698
6 5
2364
6 3531229270
36183782269
228
8 8 868284 862254 8632 5 745
18 6
244
8724216942
1 6 1
1 9
8 864
21861184235
23232
48 70
848514
29282213
71 14034
1662
1 9
76512606
1 230
8174792402419
2 322852 5 2
2 8 0
24110
72 63
4 9
57 247
227
2 5 0
259
862561511926626 1 6 5
2 5 5
154174
90283510
223
2 6 8
9124 6281
3366
2 2 5
2 7 9
97 96
5 0
0 2012 6 7
1 3
0 75248
224
2 5 3
215
95 1091 6 2
238 517245
9327 179
2 1 7
2 5 8
200
1 6 7
1 6 3
1 5 217 5 4 2
23762
2 5 1
2 3
4 98 1 6 4115 516285 2 9
193
1 5 3
194
214
1 7
55018 51414480171821621639 23165
38 24351594
11353 19540
249
112
534
145172187233
1 6 0178 5055092
0 3
218
1 3
6 155
226
18183137188561
9 9
77134
1 1 4 14368
1 5 8
1 4 2
121 1395351 5 0 138147
1 5 6
1 5 9
4155 511
1 7
352
19215205
111 1822072
0 4
1 4 8
122 20615 7
1 0
8 5
2 6
208
127
5 3
8 99 5085 1 3 536210
146
1 4 9
532
191
5 1 2
519 53720254
133
116 176120 525104
126
1 6 8
102
209
190119 521197523105 5225
2 8
5185391895
2 7
1 3
1 533
125
520
540524101
132
135
100
123 177196507506118
117107106
124
834
64 73
25 67
239
89 866
W a t e r m a n B l
Mankas Corner Rd RanchoSo
la
n
o
Pkwy
StAnd r e w s RdVista GrandeCalaveras DrBearCreekDrColonialCtCapitola WyBay Hill DrLomitaCtAscotDrCotswoldHillDr DelMonte D r
SeabrookDr
Carmel WyMadrone DrMeccaCtWhite M a r s h L n
CherryHillsCt Pau Ct
Butler Ct
F o x f i r e C t Salishan CtLasHadasCtTroon CtShawnee CtPortola CtCalaveras CtRancho Solano PkwySheet 4 of 7 Packet Page 469 of 839Attachment 21 Page 29 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELDLANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
StAndrewRd12
6 263
502302 500
501
11 440
301
496
1 499
4 2
4 498
264
835
212
10761495 504
13 264
5 9
261
870
1 2 8
597
497
611
211
425
285619
413402
180503
457
37272
847
8 3
9 444
9 4
8388495930 8485817018584247
43220 3947 8 2
271274 8 6 0
867541273844859841221 843846530222 3871061
20840386269837
531362265
857
608698
5 4
138
6 5 3968
5 8 8552363614
6 382
8513518503531229 3853582703634318335922349845
228 868284 862254 8632 5 7
3 5 4
388350458527
8 3
244
24239042 3607981
9 8
864
21861184235
8 0 2
23232 78448 395853444856826478391
29282213 393412
275801
2 1
9 484
348 78579938951342875 9 6
279260458 786383
6 1
230
828
240241827
278397
2862 5 2
2 8 0
24417262
4 9 247
833
227
63 379
829
2 5 0
259
381
57 81725619832
836266
309
831
392268252 5 5
2 9 4
174813830
4 2 6
283510
223
2 6 8
24 6281 3402 2 5
8 1
9 4
8 7
423814
2018242 6 7
1 3
0 248
224
2 5 3
215 821238815 517812245
800
311272 1 7 7902 5 8
3 6 6
200300 420342823818
17422
645816
421
5 4 2449
237454308303
62 355
2 5 1808 3676292
3 4 7964558 0 3
4 8
5 516376357809282 8 9 81146645 07935 2 9344468
193
401
17 9 3203233
1 9469
194
2 8 8
416
3 8 4822810443452 3807 8 8
214
1 7
5 7974
4 6
447
5079279418787493514439276293477804171820
16399453216805567414
347
40039
415
23145138 2438065157914188073133
1 7795
364
296620456470
531951291440 335249 377534 6101722773 0 7479
441628312
579346476471 3 0 6
4 8
6 233363341
2921783255052915093786
2 5
2 0
34804
8 8
3 1
5 4
8 9
218
467
226
181419472 3 0 4 642
411630
3753
1 8
561
9 9297 3
1 4
2994
4 5 3243984423213723
1 6
6 2
64733
2 8
3 5
3 4054
8 3
295365
5353
3 1 3104746 3 5475305
4155 511
1 7
352 61319215 559 6183456 4 6322
2051822074102
0 4 3344042063684035
2 6
6 2 1
208
5 3
8437
508290
62 7
5 1 3
3 5
6 406408536374333210427 409370352407641
532460465
33431191
5 1 2
519429369481298338
3 3
2438
537202434 371327545683 3 7435
5 5 4
1766433363
3 0463464
4333
2 9
4595253 2 6491490
5564615666244626 4 4436
634209432 6474925215781974285234303735225
2 8 5695185396 2 2
339
6 2 3
5606156 3 2
5 2
7551 533 6126335 5 3
55 7
6 3 6
5775945835 5 5 601585520 573587540564524571651590550638648603177196326045766005496375075995 5 8
5756145925061
3 1 5935436496075865845886 3 1
563580562572591617565640609639598544570602552650545606574581608548589616595605547448582546561834 64 25
72 1022482
141
239
67 866
StAn d r e w s RdPenn Creek DrRanchoSolano
PkwySeminoleDr
BearCreekDrPalmer CirTrevino WyBanff Dr
C h erry ValleyDr
PineV
alley
Dr
HilbornRdSonoma
V
alley
Dr
CherryValleyCir ShelterHillDrCotswoldHillDr
S
k
y
view
Cir
VistaGrandeL
o
ngview
DrRo ckridgeD rDel Monte DrMart
i
nR
d
White M a r s h L n
BentT re e C tPau Ct
W
his
p
erin
g
O
a
k
s
Dr
F o x f i r e C t Salishan CtAyr CtTroon CtT u c k a w a y C tPalmer CirRanchoSolanoPkwySheet 5 of 7 Packet Page 470 of 839Attachment 21 Page 30 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELDLANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELDCOUNTY OF SOLANOSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 652
261
690
1023
1082
1083
664
1026
1025
686
705
1027 1028
2 704
1 0 8 5
1106
703
687
688
1024
6891109683
6 5
3 1114
691
675
665
661
716 719717
676
718
685
684
674673
657
662
654
655
720
659
656
678
660667
694
682
696
677
6 8
0 663 6726926
8 1
6 7
9 666
6936586956976
6 9 6716
7 0
6 6
8 715
1029
69826472110981096111110991101109711121100
1 1 0 71113111072511051
0 8
8 1104110311021
0 8
6 1
0 9
0 1087
11081095
1089
10931
0 9
4 10911
0 9
2 1084
Hilton Head Dr
Oakland HillsDr
F
ir
e
s
t
o
n
e

C
tWin ged Foot DrS tA n d r e w s R dInwood PlBlackhawkPlInwoodD r Sheet 6 of 7
Packet Page 471 of 839Attachment 21 Page 31 of 67

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2023-5 (RANCHO SOLANO)

CITY OF FAIRFIELD

COUNTY OF SOLANO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sheet 7 of 7

ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN 1 0151-100-190 86 0151-314-200 171 0151-331-090 256 0151-370-120 341 0151-553-020 426 0151-571-120 511 0151-621-220 596 0151-634-120 681 0151-692-080 766 0151-723-130 851 0151-760-020 936 0151-790-160 1021 0151-890-040 1106 0151-930-130 1191 0151-952-070 1276 0151-982-210 2 0151-100-200 87 0151-314-210 172 0151-331-100 257 0151-381-010 342 0151-553-030 427 0151-571-130 512 0151-621-230 597 0151-634-130 682 0151-692-090 767 0151-723-140 852 0151-760-030 937 0151-790-170 1022 0151-890-050 1107 0151-930-140 1192 0151-952-080 1277 0151-982-220 3 0151-110-070 88 0151-314-220 173 0151-332-010 258 0151-381-020 343 0151-553-040 428 0151-571-140 513 0151-621-240 598 0151-635-010 683 0151-692-100 768 0151-723-150 853 0151-760-040 938 0151-790-180 1023 0151-890-060 1108 0151-930-150 1193 0151-952-090 1278 0151-982-230 4 0151-110-090 89 0151-314-230 174 0151-332-020 259 0151-381-030 344 0151-553-050 429 0151-571-150 514 0151-621-250 599 0151-635-020 684 0151-692-110 769 0151-723-160 854 0151-760-050 939 0151-790-190 1024 0151-890-070 1109 0151-930-160 1194 0151-961-010 1279 0151-982-240 5 0151-110-100 90 0151-314-240 175 0151-332-030 260 0151-381-040 345 0151-553-060 430 0151-572-010 515 0151-621-260 600 0151-635-030 685 0151-692-120 770 0151-731-010 855 0151-760-060 940 0151-790-200 1025 0151-890-080 1110 0151-930-170 1195 0151-961-020 1280 0151-982-250 6 0151-160-100 91 0151-314-250 176 0151-332-040 261 0151-381-050 346 0151-554-010 431 0151-572-020 516 0151-621-270 601 0151-635-040 686 0151-692-130 771 0151-731-020 856 0151-760-070 941 0151-790-210 1026 0151-890-090 1111 0151-930-180 1196 0151-961-030 1281 0151-982-260 7 0151-110-110 92 0151-314-260 177 0151-332-050 262 0151-382-010 347 0151-554-020 432 0151-572-030 517 0151-621-280 602 0151-635-050 687 0151-701-010 772 0151-731-030 857 0151-760-080 942 0151-790-220 1027 0151-890-100 1112 0151-930-190 1197 0151-961-040 1282 0151-983-010 8 0151-301-010 93 0151-314-270 178 0151-332-060 263 0151-382-020 348 0151-554-030 433 0151-572-040 518 0151-621-290 603 0151-635-060 688 0151-702-010 773 0151-731-040 858 0151-760-090 943 0151-790-230 1028 0151-890-110 1113 0151-930-200 1198 0151-961-050 1283 0151-983-020 9 0151-301-020 94 0151-314-280 179 0151-332-070 264 0151-382-030 349 0151-554-040 434 0151-572-050 519 0151-621-300 604 0151-635-070 689 0151-702-020 774 0151-731-050 859 0151-760-100 944 0151-790-240 1029 0151-890-120 1114 0151-930-210 1199 0151-961-060 1284 0151-983-030 10 0151-301-030 95 0151-314-290 180 0151-332-080 265 0151-382-040 350 0151-554-050 435 0151-572-060 520 0151-621-320 605 0151-641-010 690 0151-702-030 775 0151-731-060 860 0151-760-110 945 0151-790-250 1030 0151-890-130 1115 0151-930-220 1200 0151-961-070 1285 0151-983-040 11 0151-301-040 96 0151-314-300 181 0151-332-090 266 0151-382-050 351 0151-554-060 436 0151-572-070 521 0151-621-330 606 0151-641-020 691 0151-702-040 776 0151-731-070 861 0151-760-120 946 0151-790-260 1031 0151-890-140 1116 0151-930-230 1201 0151-961-080 1286 0151-983-050 12 0151-301-050 97 0151-314-310 182 0151-332-100 267 0151-382-060 352 0151-554-070 437 0151-572-080 522 0151-621-340 607 0151-641-030 692 0151-702-050 777 0151-731-080 862 0151-760-130 947 0151-790-270 1032 0151-890-150 1117 0151-930-240 1202 0151-961-090 1287 0151-983-060 13 0151-301-060 98 0151-314-320 183 0151-332-110 268 0151-382-070 353 0151-554-080 438 0151-581-010 523 0151-621-350 608 0151-641-040 693 0151-702-060 778 0151-731-090 863 0151-760-140 948 0151-790-280 1033 0151-890-160 1118 0151-930-250 1203 0151-961-100 1288 0151-983-070 14 0151-301-070 99 0151-314-330 184 0151-332-120 269 0151-382-080 354 0151-555-010 439 0151-581-020 524 0151-621-360 609 0151-641-050 694 0151-702-070 779 0151-731-100 864 0151-760-150 949 0151-790-290 1034 0151-890-170 1119 0151-930-260 1204 0151-961-110 1289 0151-983-080 15 0151-301-080 100 0151-314-340 185 0151-332-130 270 0151-382-090 355 0151-555-020 440 0151-581-030 525 0151-621-370 610 0151-641-060 695 0151-702-080 780 0151-731-120 865 0151-760-160 950 0151-790-300 1035 0151-890-180 1120 0151-930-270 1205 0151-961-120 1290 0151-983-090 16 0151-301-090 101 0151-314-350 186 0151-332-140 271 0151-382-100 356 0151-555-030 441 0151-581-040 526 0151-621-380 611 0151-641-110 696 0151-702-090 781 0151-731-130 866 0151-760-170 951 0151-790-310 1036 0151-890-190 1121 0151-930-280 1206 0151-961-130 1291 0151-983-100 17 0151-301-100 102 0151-314-360 187 0151-332-150 272 0151-382-110 357 0151-555-040 442 0151-581-050 527 0151-621-390 612 0151-641-120 697 0151-702-100 782 0151-731-140 867 0151-760-180 952 0151-790-320 1037 0151-890-200 1122 0151-930-290 1207 0151-961-140 1292 0151-983-110 18 0151-301-110 103 0151-314-370 188 0151-332-160 273 0151-382-120 358 0151-561-010 443 0151-581-060 528 0151-621-400 613 0151-641-130 698 0151-702-110 783 0151-731-150 868 0151-760-190 953 0151-790-330 1038 0151-890-210 1123 0151-930-300 1208 0151-961-150 1293 0151-983-120 19 0151-301-120 104 0151-314-380 189 0151-332-170 274 0151-382-130 359 0151-562-010 444 0151-581-070 529 0151-621-410 614 0151-641-140 699 0151-702-120 784 0151-731-160 869 0151-770-010 954 0151-790-340 1039 0151-890-220 1124 0151-930-310 1209 0151-962-010 1294 0151-983-130 20 0151-301-130 105 0151-314-390 190 0151-332-180 275 0151-382-140 360 0151-562-020 445 0151-581-080 530 0151-621-420 615 0151-642-010 700 0151-702-130 785 0151-731-170 870 0151-770-020 955 0151-790-350 1040 0151-890-230 1125 0151-930-320 1210 0151-962-020 1295 0151-983-140 21 0151-301-140 106 0151-314-400 191 0151-332-190 276 0151-382-150 361 0151-562-030 446 0151-581-090 531 0151-622-010 616 0151-642-020 701 0151-702-140 786 0151-731-180 871 0151-770-030 956 0151-790-360 1041 0151-900-010 1126 0151-930-330 1211 0151-962-030 1296 0151-983-150 22 0151-301-150 107 0151-314-410 192 0151-332-200 277 0151-382-160 362 0151-562-040 447 0151-582-010 532 0151-622-020 617 0151-642-030 702 0151-702-150 787 0151-731-190 872 0151-770-040 957 0151-790-370 1042 0151-900-020 1127 0151-930-340 1212 0151-962-040 1297 0151-983-160 23 0151-301-160 108 0151-314-420 193 0151-332-210 278 0151-391-010 363 0151-562-050 448 0151-582-020 533 0151-622-030 618 0151-642-040 703 0151-702-160 788 0151-731-200 873 0151-770-050 958 0151-790-380 1043 0151-900-030 1128 0151-930-350 1213 0151-962-050 1298 0151-983-170 24 0151-301-170 109 0151-314-430 194 0151-332-220 279 0151-391-020 364 0151-562-060 449 0151-582-030 534 0151-622-040 619 0151-642-050 704 0151-702-170 789 0151-731-210 874 0151-770-060 959 0151-790-390 1044 0151-900-040 1129 0151-930-360 1214 0151-962-060 1299 0151-983-180 25 0151-301-180 110 0151-314-440 195 0151-332-230 280 0151-391-030 365 0151-562-070 450 0151-582-040 535 0151-622-050 620 0151-643-010 705 0151-702-180 790 0151-731-220 875 0151-770-070 960 0151-790-400 1045 0151-900-050 1130 0151-930-370 1215 0151-962-070 1300 0151-983-190 26 0151-301-190 111 0151-314-450 196 0151-332-240 281 0151-391-040 366 0151-562-080 451 0151-582-050 536 0151-622-060 621 0151-643-020 706 0151-702-190 791 0151-731-230 876 0151-770-080 961 0151-790-410 1046 0151-900-060 1131 0151-930-380 1216 0151-962-080 1301 0151-983-200 27 0151-301-200 112 0151-314-460 197 0151-332-250 282 0151-391-050 367 0151-562-090 452 0151-582-060 537 0151-622-070 622 0151-643-030 707 0151-702-200 792 0151-731-240 877 0151-770-090 962 0151-790-420 1047 0151-900-070 1132 0151-930-390 1217 0151-962-090 1302 0151-983-210 28 0151-301-210 113 0151-314-470 198 0151-332-260 283 0151-391-060 368 0151-562-100 453 0151-582-070 538 0151-622-080 623 0151-643-040 708 0151-702-210 793 0151-732-010 878 0151-770-100 963 0151-790-430 1048 0151-900-080 1133 0151-941-010 1218 0151-962-100 1303 0151-983-220 29 0151-301-220 114 0151-314-480 199 0151-332-270 284 0151-391-070 369 0151-562-110 454 0151-582-080 539 0151-622-090 624 0151-643-050 709 0151-702-220 794 0151-732-020 879 0151-770-110 964 0151-790-440 1049 0151-900-090 1134 0151-941-020 1219 0151-962-110 1304 0151-983-230 30 0151-301-230 115 0151-314-490 200 0151-332-280 285 0151-391-080 370 0151-562-120 455 0151-582-090 540 0151-622-100 625 0151-643-060 710 0151-711-010 795 0151-732-030 880 0151-770-120 965 0151-790-450 1050 0151-900-100 1135 0151-941-030 1220 0151-962-120 1305 0151-983-240 31 0151-302-010 116 0151-314-500 201 0151-333-010 286 0151-391-090 371 0151-562-130 456 0151-583-010 541 0151-622-110 626 0151-644-010 711 0151-711-020 796 0151-732-040 881 0151-770-130 966 0151-790-460 1051 0151-900-110 1136 0151-941-040 1221 0151-962-130 1306 0151-983-250 32 0151-302-020 117 0151-314-510 202 0151-333-020 287 0151-391-100 372 0151-562-140 457 0151-583-020 542 0151-622-120 627 0151-644-020 712 0151-711-030 797 0151-732-050 882 0151-770-140 967 0151-790-470 1052 0151-900-120 1137 0151-941-050 1222 0151-962-140 1307 0151-983-260 33 0151-302-030 118 0151-314-520 203 0151-333-030 288 0151-391-110 373 0151-562-150 458 0151-583-030 543 0151-622-130 628 0151-644-030 713 0151-711-040 798 0151-732-060 883 0151-770-150 968 0151-790-480 1053 0151-900-130 1138 0151-941-060 1223 0151-962-150 1308 0151-983-270 34 0151-302-040 119 0151-314-530 204 0151-341-010 289 0151-391-120 374 0151-562-160 459 0151-591-010 544 0151-622-140 629 0151-644-040 714 0151-711-050 799 0151-732-070 884 0151-770-160 969 0151-790-490 1054 0151-900-140 1139 0151-941-070 1224 0151-962-160 1309 0151-983-280 35 0151-302-050 120 0151-314-540 205 0151-341-020 290 0151-391-130 375 0151-562-170 460 0151-591-020 545 0151-631-030 630 0151-644-050 715 0151-711-060 800 0151-732-080 885 0151-770-170 970 0151-800-010 1055 0151-900-150 1140 0151-941-080 1225 0151-962-170 1310 0151-983-290 36 0151-302-060 121 0151-314-550 206 0151-341-030 291 0151-391-140 376 0151-562-180 461 0151-591-030 546 0151-631-040 631 0151-645-010 716 0151-711-070 801 0151-732-090 886 0151-770-180 971 0151-800-020 1056 0151-900-160 1141 0151-941-090 1226 0151-962-180 1311 0151-983-300 37 0151-302-070 122 0151-321-010 207 0151-341-040 292 0151-391-150 377 0151-562-190 462 0151-591-040 547 0151-631-050 632 0151-645-020 717 0151-711-080 802 0151-732-100 887 0151-770-190 972 0151-800-030 1057 0151-900-170 1142 0151-941-100 1227 0151-962-190 1312 0151-983-310 38 0151-302-080 123 0151-321-020 208 0151-341-050 293 0151-391-160 378 0151-562-200 463 0151-591-050 548 0151-631-060 633 0151-645-030 718 0151-711-090 803 0151-732-110 888 0151-770-200 973 0151-800-040 1058 0151-900-180 1143 0151-941-110 1228 0151-963-010 1313 0151-983-320 39 0151-302-090 124 0151-321-030 209 0151-341-060 294 0151-551-010 379 0151-562-210 464 0151-591-060 549 0151-631-070 634 0151-645-040 719 0151-711-100 804 0151-732-120 889 0151-770-210 974 0151-800-050 1059 0151-900-190 1144 0151-941-120 1229 0151-963-020 1314 0151-983-330 40 0151-302-100 125 0151-321-040 210 0151-341-070 295 0151-551-020 380 0151-562-220 465 0151-591-070 550 0151-631-080 635 0151-645-050 720 0151-711-110 805 0151-732-130 890 0151-770-220 975 0151-800-060 1060 0151-900-200 1145 0151-941-130 1230 0151-963-030 1315 0151-983-340 41 0151-302-110 126 0151-322-010 211 0151-341-080 296 0151-551-030 381 0151-562-230 466 0151-591-080 551 0151-631-090 636 0151-645-060 721 0151-711-120 806 0151-732-140 891 0151-770-230 976 0151-800-070 1061 0151-910-020 1146 0151-941-140 1231 0151-963-040 1316 0151-983-350 42 0151-302-120 127 0151-322-020 212 0151-341-090 297 0151-551-040 382 0151-562-240 467 0151-591-090 552 0151-631-100 637 0151-651-010 722 0151-711-130 807 0151-733-010 892 0151-770-240 977 0151-800-080 1062 0151-910-030 1147 0151-941-150 1232 0151-963-050 1317 0151-983-360 43 0151-302-130 128 0151-322-030 213 0151-341-100 298 0151-551-050 383 0151-562-250 468 0151-591-100 553 0151-631-110 638 0151-652-030 723 0151-711-140 808 0151-733-020 893 0151-770-250 978 0151-800-090 1063 0151-920-020 1148 0151-941-160 1233 0151-963-060 1318 0151-983-370 44 0151-302-140 129 0151-322-040 214 0151-341-110 299 0151-551-060 384 0151-562-260 469 0151-591-110 554 0151-631-120 639 0151-652-040 724 0151-711-150 809 0151-733-030 894 0151-770-260 979 0151-800-100 1064 0151-921-010 1149 0151-941-170 1234 0151-963-070 1319 0151-984-010 45 0151-302-150 130 0151-322-050 215 0151-341-120 300 0151-551-070 385 0151-562-270 470 0151-591-120 555 0151-631-130 640 0151-652-050 725 0151-711-160 810 0151-733-040 895 0151-770-270 980 0151-800-110 1065 0151-921-020 1150 0151-941-180 1235 0151-963-080 1320 0151-300-010 46 0151-302-160 131 0151-322-060 216 0151-341-130 301 0151-551-080 386 0151-562-280 471 0151-591-130 556 0151-631-140 641 0151-652-060 726 0151-711-170 811 0151-733-050 896 0151-770-280 981 0151-800-120 1066 0151-921-030 1151 0151-941-190 1236 0151-963-090 1321 0151-550-010 47 0151-302-170 132 0151-322-070 217 0151-341-140 302 0151-551-090 387 0151-562-290 472 0151-591-140 557 0151-632-010 642 0151-652-070 727 0151-711-180 812 0151-733-060 897 0151-770-290 982 0151-800-130 1067 0151-921-040 1152 0151-941-200 1237 0151-963-100 1322 0151-160-220 48 0151-302-180 133 0151-322-080 218 0151-341-150 303 0151-551-100 388 0151-562-300 473 0151-591-150 558 0151-632-020 643 0151-652-080 728 0151-711-190 813 0151-733-070 898 0151-770-300 983 0151-800-140 1068 0151-921-050 1153 0151-941-210 1238 0151-963-110 1323 0151-320-010 49 0151-302-190 134 0151-323-010 219 0151-341-160 304 0151-551-110 389 0151-562-310 474 0151-591-160 559 0151-632-030 644 0151-652-090 729 0151-711-200 814 0151-741-010 899 0151-770-310 984 0151-800-150 1069 0151-921-060 1154 0151-941-220 1239 0151-963-120 1324 0151-340-010 50 0151-302-200 135 0151-323-020 220 0151-341-170 305 0151-551-120 390 0151-562-320 475 0151-592-010 560 0151-632-040 645 0151-652-100 730 0151-711-210 815 0151-742-010 900 0151-780-010 985 0151-800-160 1070 0151-921-070 1155 0151-941-230 1240 0151-963-130 1325 0151-610-140 51 0151-303-010 136 0151-323-030 221 0151-341-180 306 0151-551-130 391 0151-562-330 476 0151-592-020 561 0151-632-050 646 0151-652-110 731 0151-711-220 816 0151-742-020 901 0151-780-020 986 0151-800-170 1071 0151-921-080 1156 0151-941-240 1241 0151-963-140 1326 0151-610-100 52 0151-303-020 137 0151-323-040 222 0151-341-190 307 0151-551-140 392 0151-562-340 477 0151-592-030 562 0151-632-060 647 0151-652-120 732 0151-711-230 817 0151-742-030 902 0151-780-030 987 0151-800-180 1072 0151-921-090 1157 0151-942-010 1242 0151-963-150 1327 0151-740-010 53 0151-303-030 138 0151-323-050 223 0151-341-200 308 0151-551-150 393 0151-563-010 478 0151-592-040 563 0151-632-070 648 0151-653-010 733 0151-711-240 818 0151-742-040 903 0151-780-040 988 0151-800-190 1073 0151-921-100 1158 0151-942-020 1243 0151-963-160 1328 0151-570-010 54 0151-303-040 139 0151-323-060 224 0151-341-210 309 0151-551-160 394 0151-563-020 479 0151-592-050 564 0151-632-080 649 0151-653-020 734 0151-712-010 819 0151-742-050 904 0151-780-050 989 0151-800-200 1074 0151-921-110 1159 0151-942-030 1244 0151-963-170 1329 0151-720-010 55 0151-303-050 140 0151-323-070 225 0151-341-220 310 0151-551-170 395 0151-563-030 480 0151-593-010 565 0151-632-090 650 0151-653-030 735 0151-712-020 820 0151-742-060 905 0151-780-060 990 0151-800-210 1075 0151-922-010 1160 0151-942-040 1245 0151-971-010 1330 0151-700-020 56 0151-303-060 141 0151-323-080 226 0151-341-230 311 0151-551-180 396 0151-563-040 481 0151-593-020 566 0151-632-100 651 0151-653-040 736 0151-712-030 821 0151-742-070 906 0151-780-070 991 0151-800-220 1076 0151-922-020 1161 0151-942-050 1246 0151-971-020 1331 0151-650-010 57 0151-303-070 142 0151-323-090 227 0151-341-240 312 0151-551-190 397 0151-563-050 482 0151-593-030 567 0151-632-110 652 0151-653-050 737 0151-712-040 822 0151-742-080 907 0151-780-080 992 0151-800-230 1077 0151-922-030 1162 0151-942-060 1247 0151-971-030 1332 0151-690-010 58 0151-303-080 143 0151-323-100 228 0151-342-010 313 0151-551-200 398 0151-563-060 483 0151-593-040 568 0151-633-010 653 0151-653-060 738 0151-712-050 823 0151-742-090 908 0151-780-090 993 0151-800-240 1078 0151-922-040 1163 0151-942-070 1248 0151-971-040 1333 0151-710-010 59 0151-312-010 144 0151-324-010 229 0151-351-010 314 0151-551-210 399 0151-563-070 484 0151-593-050 569 0151-633-020 654 0151-653-070 739 0151-712-060 824 0151-743-010 909 0151-780-100 994 0151-800-250 1079 0151-922-050 1164 0151-942-080 1249 0151-971-050 1334 0151-950-010 60 0151-312-020 145 0151-324-020 230 0151-351-020 315 0151-551-220 400 0151-563-080 485 0151-610-020 570 0151-633-030 655 0151-653-080 740 0151-712-070 825 0151-743-020 910 0151-780-110 995 0151-800-260 1080 0151-922-060 1165 0151-942-090 1250 0151-971-060 1335 0151-960-010 61 0151-312-030 146 0151-324-030 231 0151-353-010 316 0151-552-010 401 0151-563-090 486 0151-610-030 571 0151-633-040 656 0151-653-090 741 0151-712-080 826 0151-743-030 911 0151-780-120 996 0151-800-270 1081 0151-922-070 1166 0151-943-010 1251 0151-972-010 1336 0151-940-010 62 0151-313-010 147 0151-324-040 232 0151-353-020 317 0151-552-020 402 0151-563-100 487 0151-610-040 572 0151-633-050 657 0151-653-100 742 0151-721-010 827 0151-743-040 912 0151-780-130 997 0151-800-280 1082 0151-922-080 1167 0151-943-020 1252 0151-972-020 1337 0151-970-010 63 0151-313-020 148 0151-324-050 233 0151-353-030 318 0151-552-030 403 0151-563-110 488 0151-610-060 573 0151-633-060 658 0151-653-110 743 0151-721-020 828 0151-743-050 913 0151-780-140 998 0151-800-290 1083 0151-922-090 1168 0151-951-010 1253 0151-972-030 1338 0151-980-010 64 0151-313-030 149 0151-324-060 234 0151-353-040 319 0151-552-040 404 0151-564-010 489 0151-610-070 574 0151-633-070 659 0151-653-120 744 0151-721-030 829 0151-743-060 914 0151-780-150 999 0151-800-300 1084 0151-922-100 1169 0151-951-020 1254 0151-972-040 1339 0151-633-180 65 0151-313-040 150 0151-324-070 235 0151-353-050 320 0151-552-050 405 0151-564-020 490 0151-610-080 575 0151-633-080 660 0151-654-030 745 0151-721-040 830 0151-743-070 915 0151-780-160 1000 0151-800-310 1085 0151-922-110 1170 0151-951-030 1255 0151-981-010 1340 0151-634-140 66 0151-313-050 151 0151-324-080 236 0151-353-060 321 0151-552-060 406 0151-564-030 491 0151-610-090 576 0151-633-090 661 0151-654-040 746 0151-721-050 831 0151-743-080 916 0151-780-170 1001 0151-800-320 1086 0151-923-010 1171 0151-951-040 1256 0151-982-010 1341 0151-635-080 67 0151-314-010 152 0151-324-090 237 0151-354-010 322 0151-552-070 407 0151-564-040 492 0151-610-120 577 0151-633-100 662 0151-654-050 747 0151-722-010 832 0151-743-090 917 0151-780-180 1002 0151-870-010 1087 0151-923-020 1172 0151-951-050 1257 0151-982-020 1342 0151-100-180 68 0151-314-020 153 0151-324-100 238 0151-354-020 323 0151-552-080 408 0151-564-050 493 0151-621-010 578 0151-633-110 663 0151-654-060 748 0151-722-020 833 0151-743-100 918 0151-780-190 1003 0151-870-020 1088 0151-923-030 1173 0151-951-060 1258 0151-982-030 1343 0151-110-050 69 0151-314-030 154 0151-325-010 239 0151-354-030 324 0151-552-090 409 0151-564-060 494 0151-621-020 579 0151-633-120 664 0151-654-070 749 0151-722-030 834 0151-743-110 919 0151-780-200 1004 0151-870-030 1089 0151-923-040 1174 0151-951-070 1259 0151-982-040 1344 0151-160-190 70 0151-314-040 155 0151-325-020 240 0151-355-010 325 0151-552-100 410 0151-564-070 495 0151-621-030 580 0151-633-130 665 0151-654-080 750 0151-722-040 835 0151-743-120 920 0151-780-210 1005 0151-870-040 1090 0151-923-050 1175 0151-951-080 1260 0151-982-050 1345 0151-140-080 71 0151-314-050 156 0151-325-030 241 0151-355-020 326 0151-552-110 411 0151-564-080 496 0151-621-040 581 0151-633-140 666 0151-654-090 751 0151-722-050 836 0151-751-010 921 0151-790-010 1006 0151-870-050 1091 0151-923-060 1176 0151-951-090 1261 0151-982-060 72 0151-314-060 157 0151-325-040 242 0151-355-030 327 0151-552-120 412 0151-564-090 497 0151-621-050 582 0151-633-150 667 0151-654-110 752 0151-722-060 837 0151-751-020 922 0151-790-020 1007 0151-870-060 1092 0151-923-070 1177 0151-951-100 1262 0151-982-070 73 0151-314-070 158 0151-325-050 243 0151-355-040 328 0151-552-130 413 0151-564-100 498 0151-621-060 583 0151-633-160 668 0151-654-120 753 0151-722-070 838 0151-751-030 923 0151-790-030 1008 0151-870-070 1093 0151-923-080 1178 0151-951-110 1263 0151-982-080 74 0151-314-080 159 0151-325-060 244 0151-355-050 329 0151-552-140 414 0151-564-110 499 0151-621-070 584 0151-633-170 669 0151-654-160 754 0151-723-010 839 0151-751-040 924 0151-790-040 1009 0151-880-010 1094 0151-930-010 1179 0151-951-120 1264 0151-982-090 75 0151-314-090 160 0151-325-070 245 0151-355-060 330 0151-552-150 415 0151-571-010 500 0151-621-080 585 0151-634-010 670 0151-654-170 755 0151-723-020 840 0151-751-050 925 0151-790-050 1010 0151-880-020 1095 0151-930-020 1180 0151-951-130 1265 0151-982-100 76 0151-314-100 161 0151-325-080 246 0151-355-070 331 0151-552-160 416 0151-571-020 501 0151-621-090 586 0151-634-020 671 0151-654-180 756 0151-723-030 841 0151-751-060 926 0151-790-060 1011 0151-880-030 1096 0151-930-030 1181 0151-951-140 1266 0151-982-110 77 0151-314-110 162 0151-325-090 247 0151-355-080 332 0151-552-170 417 0151-571-030 502 0151-621-100 587 0151-634-030 672 0151-655-010 757 0151-723-040 842 0151-751-070 927 0151-790-070 1012 0151-880-040 1097 0151-930-040 1182 0151-951-150 1267 0151-982-120 78 0151-314-120 163 0151-331-010 248 0151-355-090 333 0151-552-180 418 0151-571-040 503 0151-621-110 588 0151-634-040 673 0151-691-010 758 0151-723-050 843 0151-751-080 928 0151-790-080 1013 0151-880-120 1098 0151-930-050 1183 0151-951-160 1268 0151-982-130 79 0151-314-130 164 0151-331-020 249 0151-355-100 334 0151-552-190 419 0151-571-050 504 0151-621-120 589 0151-634-050 674 0151-692-010 759 0151-723-060 844 0151-751-090 929 0151-790-090 1014 0151-880-140 1099 0151-930-060 1184 0151-951-170 1269 0151-982-140 80 0151-314-140 165 0151-331-030 250 0151-355-110 335 0151-552-200 420 0151-571-060 505 0151-621-130 590 0151-634-060 675 0151-692-020 760 0151-723-070 845 0151-752-010 930 0151-790-100 1015 0151-880-160 1100 0151-930-070 1185 0151-952-010 1270 0151-982-150 81 0151-314-150 166 0151-331-040 251 0151-355-120 336 0151-552-210 421 0151-571-070 506 0151-621-140 591 0151-634-070 676 0151-692-030 761 0151-723-080 846 0151-752-020 931 0151-790-110 1016 0151-880-170 1101 0151-930-080 1186 0151-952-020 1271 0151-982-160 82 0151-314-160 167 0151-331-050 252 0151-355-130 337 0151-552-220 422 0151-571-080 507 0151-621-170 592 0151-634-080 677 0151-692-040 762 0151-723-090 847 0151-752-030 932 0151-790-120 1017 0151-880-180 1102 0151-930-090 1187 0151-952-030 1272 0151-982-170 83 0151-314-170 168 0151-331-060 253 0151-360-020 338 0151-552-230 423 0151-571-090 508 0151-621-180 593 0151-634-090 678 0151-692-050 763 0151-723-100 848 0151-752-040 933 0151-790-130 1018 0151-890-010 1103 0151-930-100 1188 0151-952-040 1273 0151-982-180 84 0151-314-180 169 0151-331-070 254 0151-360-050 339 0151-552-240 424 0151-571-100 509 0151-621-200 594 0151-634-100 679 0151-692-060 764 0151-723-110 849 0151-752-050 934 0151-790-140 1019 0151-890-020 1104 0151-930-110 1189 0151-952-050 1274 0151-982-190 85 0151-314-190 170 0151-331-080 255 0151-370-040 340 0151-553-010 425 0151-571-110 510 0151-621-210 595 0151-634-110 680 0151-692-070 765 0151-723-120 850 0151-760-010 935 0151-790-150 1020 0151-890-030 1105 0151-930-120 1190 0151-952-060 1275 0151-982-200 Packet Page 472 of 839Attachment 21 Page 32 of 67

City of Fairfield
Engineer’s Report – Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano) 28

9. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The following pages contain the proposed 2023/24 assessment roll for the District.

Packet Page 473 of 839Attachment 21 Page 33 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*10151-100-1903250 RANCHO SOLANO PKWYClubhouse/Recreation2.00 2.00 14.55 - - 58.19 $27.03$4,224.73$4,251.7520151-100-200 Clubhouse/Recreation2.00 2.00 3.48 4.63 12.29 81.60 37.91 5,924.12 5,962.02 30151-110-070 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 40151-110-090 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 50151-110-100 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 60151-160-100 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 70151-110-110 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 80151-301-0103379 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.66 0.76 7.88 3.66 572.19 575.85 90151-301-0203373 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.35 0.77 0.76 7.48 3.48 543.28 546.75 100151-301-0303367 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.55 0.76 6.67 3.10 483.88 486.97 110151-301-0403361 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.57 0.76 6.80 3.16 493.47 496.62 120151-301-0503355 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.77 0.76 7.55 3.51 548.28 551.78 130151-301-0603349 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.42 0.66 0.76 7.36 3.42 534.29 537.70 140151-301-0703318 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.60 0.77 0.76 8.50 3.95 616.72 620.66 150151-301-0803324 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.77 0.76 8.16 3.79 592.40 596.18 160151-301-0903330 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.66 0.76 7.72 3.59 560.67 564.25 170151-301-1003336 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.77 0.76 7.98 3.71 579.42 583.12 180151-301-1103342 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.77 0.76 8.18 3.80 593.99 597.78 190151-301-120 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 200151-301-1303335 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.42 0.79 0.76 7.86 3.65 570.73 574.37 210151-301-1403329 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.55 0.76 6.75 3.14 490.10 493.23 220151-301-1503323 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.37 0.57 0.76 6.78 3.15 492.21 495.36 230151-301-1603317 FOXFIRE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.77 0.76 7.88 3.66 571.89 575.54 240151-301-1702461 WHITEMARSH DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.82 0.74 0.76 9.26 4.30 671.90 676.20 250151-301-1802455 WHITEMARSH DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.77 0.76 8.38 3.89 608.71 612.60 260151-301-1903304 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.66 0.76 7.41 3.44 538.15 541.59 270151-301-2003310 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.77 0.76 7.66 3.56 556.05 559.60 280151-301-2103316 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.57 0.76 7.10 3.30 515.28 518.57 290151-301-2203322 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.66 0.76 7.95 3.69 576.98 580.67 300151-301-2303328 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.54 0.77 0.76 8.27 3.84 600.30 604.13 310151-302-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 320151-302-0202462 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.41 0.77 0.76 8.50 3.59 672.79 676.38 330151-302-0302466 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.35 0.66 0.76 7.77 3.28 615.29 618.57 340151-302-0402470 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.36 0.79 0.76 8.37 3.54 663.21 666.74 350151-302-0502474 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.34 0.66 0.76 7.72 3.26 611.25 614.50 360151-302-0602478 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.42 0.80 0.76 8.68 3.67 687.71 691.37 370151-302-0702482 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.81 0.66 0.76 9.80 4.14 776.23 780.36 380151-302-0802486 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.96 0.57 0.76 10.05 4.24 795.89 800.13 390151-302-0902481 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.52 0.66 0.76 8.49 3.59 672.57 676.15 400151-302-1002477 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.60 0.77 0.76 9.33 3.94 738.52 742.45 410151-302-1102473 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.78 0.77 0.76 10.12 4.27 801.65 805.92 Packet Page 474 of 839Attachment 21 Page 34 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*420151-302-1202469 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.48 0.77 0.76 8.82 3.72 698.19 701.91 430151-302-1302465 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.44 0.66 0.76 8.15 3.44 645.71 649.15 440151-302-1402461 BAY HILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.44 0.55 0.76 7.65 3.23 606.22 609.45 450151-302-1503343 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.77 0.76 7.71 3.58 559.99 563.57 460151-302-1603327 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.34 0.66 0.76 7.02 3.26 509.85 513.11 470151-302-1703321 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.33 0.77 0.76 7.41 3.44 538.02 541.46 480151-302-1803315 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.33 0.66 0.76 7.67 3.24 607.55 610.78 490151-302-1903309 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.33 0.86 0.76 8.56 3.62 677.98 681.59 500151-302-2003303 WHITEMARSH LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.33 0.79 0.76 8.24 3.48 652.40 655.87 510151-303-0102458 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.41 0.57 0.76 6.94 3.22 503.76 506.97 520151-303-0202464 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.84 0.82 0.76 9.63 4.47 699.15 703.62 530151-303-0302470 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.84 0.79 0.76 9.52 4.42 691.43 695.85 540151-303-0402465 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 0.66 0.76 8.09 3.76 587.47 591.23 550151-303-0502459 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.57 0.76 7.16 3.32 519.57 522.89 560151-303-0602453 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.66 0.76 7.27 3.38 528.09 531.46 570151-303-0702447 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.55 0.76 6.77 3.14 491.32 494.46 580151-303-080 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 590151-312-0102443 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.37 0.57 0.76 6.77 3.14 491.37 494.51 600151-312-0202441 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.54 0.76 6.73 3.12 488.29 491.41 610151-312-030 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 620151-313-0102427 SEABROOK CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.79 0.76 7.69 3.57 558.21 561.78 630151-313-0202421 SEABROOK CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.57 0.76 7.15 3.32 518.97 522.29 640151-313-0302440 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.57 0.76 7.17 3.33 520.16 523.49 650151-313-0402446 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.57 0.76 7.08 3.29 513.90 517.18 660151-313-0502452 SAWGRASS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.43 0.77 0.76 7.82 3.63 567.42 571.04 670151-314-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 680151-314-0203327 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.43 0.83 0.76 8.07 3.75 585.53 589.27 690151-314-0303321 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.41 0.66 0.76 7.29 3.39 529.52 532.90 700151-314-0403315 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.66 0.76 7.26 3.37 526.91 530.28 710151-314-0503309 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.41 0.57 0.76 6.92 3.21 502.17 505.37 720151-314-0603303 COLONIAL CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.53 0.83 0.76 8.44 3.92 612.42 616.34 730151-314-0703300 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.77 0.76 7.85 3.65 569.85 573.49 740151-314-0803306 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.66 0.76 7.22 3.35 524.07 527.41 750151-314-0903308 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.77 0.76 7.64 3.55 554.46 558.00 760151-314-1003314 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.34 0.66 0.76 7.02 3.26 509.52 512.77 770151-314-1103320 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.35 0.77 0.76 7.50 3.48 544.27 547.75 780151-314-1203324 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.66 0.76 7.56 3.51 548.71 552.22 790151-314-1303313 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.43 0.55 0.76 6.95 3.23 504.42 507.64 800151-314-1403307 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.77 0.76 7.62 3.54 553.49 557.03 810151-314-1503301 BUTLER CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.37 0.66 0.76 7.12 3.31 517.12 520.42 820151-314-1602413 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.77 0.76 8.19 3.80 594.54 598.34 Packet Page 475 of 839Attachment 21 Page 35 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*830151-314-170 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 840151-314-1802402 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.66 0.76 7.11 3.30 515.83 519.13 850151-314-1902406 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.41 0.57 0.76 6.92 3.22 502.53 505.74 860151-314-2002410 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.42 0.55 0.76 6.88 3.20 499.48 502.67 870151-314-2102414 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.57 0.76 6.74 3.13 489.06 492.19 880151-314-2202418 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.55 0.76 6.66 3.09 483.42 486.51 890151-314-2302422 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.77 0.76 7.54 3.50 547.56 551.06 900151-314-2402426 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.57 0.76 6.83 3.17 495.74 498.91 910151-314-2502430 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.55 0.76 6.80 3.16 493.90 497.05 920151-314-2602434 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.77 0.76 7.69 3.57 558.04 561.60 930151-314-2702438 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.66 0.76 7.12 3.31 516.78 520.09 940151-314-2802442 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.57 0.76 6.74 3.13 489.06 492.19 950151-314-2902446 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.55 0.76 6.66 3.09 483.42 486.51 960151-314-3002450 BAY HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.42 0.57 0.76 6.97 3.24 505.84 509.07 970151-314-310 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 980151-314-3202429 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.41 0.57 0.76 6.94 3.22 503.85 507.07 990151-314-3302423 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.37 0.82 0.76 7.80 3.63 566.54 570.16 1000151-314-3402417 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.66 0.76 7.19 3.34 521.76 525.09 1010151-314-3502411 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.77 0.76 7.69 3.57 557.93 561.49 1020151-314-3602406 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.55 0.76 7.10 3.30 515.22 518.51 1030151-314-3702412 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.66 0.76 7.94 3.69 576.26 579.94 1040151-314-3802418 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.58 0.77 0.76 8.41 3.91 610.30 614.20 1050151-314-3902424 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.55 0.76 7.12 3.31 516.95 520.25 1060151-314-4002430 SHAWNEE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.49 0.57 0.76 7.25 3.37 526.36 529.73 1070151-314-4102415 SEABROOK DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.57 0.76 7.21 3.35 523.15 526.49 1080151-314-4202409 SEABROOK DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.55 0.76 7.07 3.28 512.96 516.24 1090151-314-4302403 SEABROOK DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.77 0.76 8.19 3.81 594.77 598.57 1100151-314-4402415 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.66 0.76 7.27 3.38 527.66 531.03 1110151-314-4502409 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.35 0.77 0.76 7.51 3.49 545.05 548.53 1120151-314-4602403 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.35 0.66 0.76 7.06 3.28 512.49 515.77 1130151-314-4702402 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.77 0.76 7.68 3.57 557.34 560.90 1140151-314-4802408 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.77 0.76 7.86 3.65 570.34 573.99 1150151-314-4902414 HOMESTEAD CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.57 0.76 7.12 3.31 517.22 520.53 1160151-314-5002413 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.57 0.76 7.23 3.36 524.54 527.89 1170151-314-5102407 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.66 0.76 7.22 3.35 523.97 527.32 1180151-314-5202401 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.36 0.77 0.76 7.53 3.50 546.30 549.79 1190151-314-5302400 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.37 0.66 0.76 7.15 3.32 519.01 522.33 1200151-314-5402406 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.40 0.77 0.76 7.68 3.57 557.66 561.22 1210151-314-5502412 MERION CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.57 0.76 7.07 3.29 513.58 516.86 1220151-321-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 1230151-321-0202445 SEABROOK CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.39 0.66 0.76 7.24 3.36 525.37 528.73 Packet Page 476 of 839Attachment 21 Page 36 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*1240151-321-0302439 SEABROOK CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.38 0.77 0.76 7.60 3.53 551.88 555.41 1250151-321-0402433 SEABROOK CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 0.66 0.76 8.09 3.76 586.96 590.71 1260151-322-0102461 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.71 0.76 7.68 3.57 557.69 561.26 1270151-322-0202455 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.27 3.84 600.20 604.04 1280151-322-0302449 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.81 0.76 8.00 3.72 581.06 584.78 1290151-322-0402443 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.26 3.84 599.89 603.72 1300151-322-0502437 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.71 0.76 7.70 3.57 558.70 562.27 1310151-322-0602431 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.89 0.76 8.40 3.90 609.77 613.67 1320151-322-0702427 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.50 0.71 0.76 7.85 3.65 570.24 573.88 1330151-322-0802421 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 0.81 0.76 8.68 4.03 629.94 633.96 1340151-323-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 1350151-323-0202406 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.50 0.83 0.76 8.34 3.88 605.68 609.55 1360151-323-0302410 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.71 0.76 7.76 3.60 563.10 566.70 1370151-323-0402414 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.51 0.87 0.76 8.57 3.98 622.26 626.23 1380151-323-0502420 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.81 0.76 8.19 3.81 594.71 598.51 1390151-323-0602425 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.05 3.74 584.16 587.90 1400151-323-0702419 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.71 0.76 7.71 3.58 559.60 563.18 1410151-323-0802413 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.29 3.85 601.95 605.80 1420151-323-0902407 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.83 0.76 8.17 3.79 592.94 596.73 1430151-323-1002401 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.87 0.76 8.32 3.86 603.97 607.83 1440151-324-0102400 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.67 0.81 0.76 8.93 4.15 648.27 652.41 1450151-324-0202406 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.59 0.87 0.76 8.86 4.12 643.16 647.27 1460151-324-0302412 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.59 0.81 0.76 8.60 3.99 624.29 628.28 1470151-324-0402418 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.60 0.83 0.76 8.77 4.08 636.89 640.96 1480151-324-0502424 PENINSULA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.58 0.81 0.76 8.56 3.98 621.72 625.69 1490151-324-0602427 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.83 0.76 8.23 3.83 597.83 601.65 1500151-324-0702421 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.71 0.76 7.81 3.63 567.00 570.62 1510151-324-0802415 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.77 0.76 8.02 3.72 582.02 585.74 1520151-324-0902409 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.87 0.76 8.32 3.86 603.88 607.74 1530151-324-1002403 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.04 3.73 583.69 587.42 1540151-325-0102402 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.72 0.94 0.76 9.66 4.49 701.06 705.54 1550151-325-0202408 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 1.04 0.76 9.60 4.46 697.09 701.55 1560151-325-0302414 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.60 0.83 0.76 8.77 4.07 636.33 640.40 1570151-325-0402420 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.87 0.76 8.78 4.08 637.76 641.83 1580151-325-0502426 LAS HADAS CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.63 0.81 0.76 8.76 4.07 636.31 640.38 1590151-325-0602423 PASATIEMPO CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.66 0.83 0.76 9.00 4.18 653.62 657.79 1600151-325-0702417 PASATIEMPO CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.53 0.87 0.76 8.63 4.01 626.85 630.86 1610151-325-0802411 PASATIEMPO CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.04 3.73 583.43 587.16 1620151-325-0902405 PASATIEMPO CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 0.83 0.76 8.81 4.09 639.45 643.54 1630151-331-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 1640151-331-0203204 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.47 0.81 0.76 8.15 3.78 591.41 595.19 Packet Page 477 of 839Attachment 21 Page 37 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*1650151-331-0303210 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.87 0.76 8.58 3.98 622.70 626.68 1660151-331-0403216 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.81 0.76 8.10 3.76 587.76 591.51 1670151-331-0503222 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.71 0.87 0.76 9.37 4.35 680.56 684.91 1680151-331-0603221 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.83 0.76 8.61 4.00 625.33 629.33 1690151-331-0703215 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.51 0.87 0.76 8.55 3.97 620.48 624.44 1700151-331-0803209 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.81 0.76 8.00 3.72 581.03 584.74 1710151-331-0903203 LA QUINTA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.87 0.76 8.33 3.87 604.56 608.42 1720151-331-1002402 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.83 0.76 8.42 3.91 611.53 615.44 1730151-332-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 1740151-332-0203226 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.52 0.71 0.76 7.97 3.70 578.25 581.95 1750151-332-0303220 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.71 0.76 7.71 3.58 559.73 563.31 1760151-332-0403214 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.71 0.81 0.76 9.09 4.22 660.23 664.45 1770151-332-0503208 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.71 0.83 0.76 9.18 4.27 666.61 670.87 1780151-332-0603202 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 1.17 0.81 0.76 10.94 5.08 793.89 798.97 1790151-332-0703201 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.81 0.81 0.76 9.51 4.42 690.13 694.54 1800151-332-0803207 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.51 0.83 0.76 8.39 3.90 609.24 613.13 1810151-332-0903213 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.71 0.76 7.69 3.57 558.14 561.71 1820151-332-1003219 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.83 0.76 8.11 3.77 589.08 592.85 1830151-332-1103225 RIVIERA CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.49 0.87 0.76 8.49 3.94 616.36 620.30 1840151-332-1202467 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.28 3.85 601.08 604.92 1850151-332-1302473 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.71 0.76 7.73 3.59 561.03 564.62 1860151-332-1402479 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.54 0.81 0.76 8.41 3.91 610.81 614.71 1870151-332-1502485 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.50 0.87 0.76 8.50 3.95 616.85 620.79 1880151-332-1603201 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.48 0.87 0.76 8.42 3.91 611.38 615.29 1890151-332-1703207 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.04 3.73 583.64 587.37 1900151-332-1803213 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.83 0.76 8.12 3.77 589.37 593.13 1910151-332-1903219 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.77 0.71 0.76 8.93 4.15 648.58 652.72 1920151-332-2003225 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.71 0.76 8.11 3.77 588.78 592.54 1930151-332-2103231 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.62 0.87 0.76 8.98 4.17 652.20 656.36 1940151-332-2203238 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.58 0.81 0.76 8.58 3.99 623.10 627.08 1950151-332-2303232 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.83 0.76 8.16 3.79 592.61 596.40 1960151-332-2403226 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.87 0.76 8.36 3.89 607.26 611.14 1970151-332-2503220 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.46 0.83 0.76 8.21 3.81 596.17 599.98 1980151-332-2603214 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.07 3.75 586.14 589.88 1990151-332-2703208 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.04 3.73 583.38 587.11 2000151-332-2803202 DEL MONTE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.45 0.81 0.76 8.07 3.75 585.98 589.72 2010151-333-0102486 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.29 3.85 601.64 605.48 2020151-333-0202492 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.83 0.76 8.13 3.78 590.29 594.06 2030151-333-0302498 DEL MONTE DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.44 0.87 0.76 8.26 3.84 599.73 603.56 2040151-341-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 2050151-341-0202504 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.62 0.99 0.76 10.39 4.39 822.81 827.20 Packet Page 478 of 839Attachment 21 Page 38 of 67

City of FairfieldLandscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2023-5 (Rancho Solano)Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment RollAssmt IDAssessor's Parcel Number Site AddressLand Use ClassificationTotal Lighting Land Use (LU) Benefit Points (BP)Total Landscaping LU BPLot FactorBuilding FactorAverage Daily Trip Factor Total BPLighting RateLandscaping RateFY 2023/24 Rates*2060151-341-0302510 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.55 0.99 0.76 10.11 4.27 800.89 805.15 2070151-341-0402516 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.55 1.18 0.76 10.96 4.63 867.73 872.35 2080151-341-0502522 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.55 0.99 0.76 10.08 4.26 798.23 802.48 2090151-341-0602528 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.63 1.05 0.76 10.71 4.52 848.12 852.64 2100151-341-0702534 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.56 0.89 0.76 9.68 4.09 766.79 770.88 2110151-341-0802540 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.71 1.13 0.76 11.41 4.82 903.83 908.65 2120151-341-0902546 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 1.10 1.07 0.76 12.89 5.44 1,021.00 1,026.44 2130151-341-1002552 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 1.05 0.97 0.76 12.21 5.16 967.28 972.44 2140151-341-1102558 COTSWOLD HILL DRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.94 1.32 0.76 13.28 5.61 1,051.70 1,057.31 2150151-341-1202515 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 1.09 0.76 9.66 4.49 701.63 706.11 2160151-341-1302509 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.55 1.35 0.76 10.60 4.92 769.50 774.42 2170151-341-1402503 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.61 1.11 0.76 9.91 4.61 719.80 724.40 2180151-341-1502502 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.59 0.99 0.76 9.31 4.32 675.69 680.01 2190151-341-1602510 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.59 0.81 0.76 8.62 4.00 625.90 629.90 2200151-341-1702516 BELLEVUE CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.67 1.22 0.76 10.55 4.90 766.08 770.97 2210151-341-1802519 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.67 0.92 0.76 9.38 4.36 681.16 685.52 2220151-341-1902513 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.64 0.97 0.76 9.47 4.40 687.15 691.55 2230151-341-2002507 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.55 1.25 0.76 10.24 4.76 743.50 748.25 2240151-341-2102501 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.65 1.58 0.76 11.94 5.55 867.04 872.59 2250151-341-2202502 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.59 1.26 0.76 10.43 4.84 756.84 761.68 2260151-341-2302508 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 1.09 0.76 9.65 4.48 700.70 705.17 2270151-341-2402514 TROON CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.85 0.76 8.68 4.03 630.25 634.28 2280151-342-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 2290151-351-0102517 KINGSMILL LNUndeveloped0.50 0.70 0.61 - - 0.73 0.28 61.90 62.18 2300151-351-0202513 KINGSMILL LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.64 0.98 0.76 10.45 4.41 827.66 832.07 2310151-353-010 No Benefit- - - - - - - - - 2320151-353-0202500 KINGSMILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.59 1.02 0.76 10.43 4.40 825.85 830.25 2330151-353-0302504 KINGSMILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.61 1.56 0.76 12.83 5.42 1,016.38 1,021.80 2340151-353-0402508 KINGSMILL CIRSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.79 1.10 0.76 11.64 4.92 922.15 927.06 2350151-353-0502512 KINGSMILL LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.56 0.70 0.76 8.88 3.75 702.99 706.73 2360151-353-0602516 KINGSMILL LNSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.40 0.71 1.16 0.76 11.56 4.88 915.46 920.34 2370151-354-0102489 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.55 0.69 0.76 7.96 3.70 578.10 581.79 2380151-354-0202487 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.85 0.76 8.67 4.03 629.32 633.34 2390151-354-0302485 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.55 1.11 0.76 9.67 4.49 702.06 706.55 2400151-355-0102484 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.91 0.76 8.88 4.12 644.62 648.74 2410151-355-0202486 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.55 0.86 0.76 8.66 4.02 628.99 633.01 2420151-355-0302488 OAKMONT CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.58 1.29 0.76 10.50 4.88 762.08 766.95 2430151-355-0402499 SALISHAN CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 1.13 0.76 9.78 4.54 709.82 714.36 2440151-355-0502493 SALISHAN CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.57 0.84 0.76 8.64 4.02 627.53 631.54 2450151-355-0602487 SALISHAN CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.56 0.89 0.76 8.84 4.11 642.04 646.15 2460151-355-0702481 SALISHAN CTSingle-Family Residential2.00 2.00 0.77 1.12 0.76 10.58 4.92 768.38 773.30 Packet Page 479 of 839Attachment 21 Page 39 of 67

Fairfield City CouncilJune 6, 2023

Fairfield City Council
June 6, 2023